The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 TeasersRussian Reaction Blog
Open Thread 200
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

The previous thread had become sluggish, so I’m opening up a new one.

I’ll jump-start the discussion with several excellent presentations by Prof. Jeffrey Sachs of Columbia University on the Ukraine/Russia conflict that I’d highly recommend. The first was an interview with Amy Goodman on Democracy Now! from a couple of months ago that’s accumulated more than two million views, the second came out a week ago on the Grayzone, and the other two were recorded earlier this month but just released:

Video Link

Oddly enough, the Tulsi Gabbard interview isn’t available on her new Youtube channel, perhaps due to concerns that discussing these important topics with the very high-ranking Columbia professor Sachs might get her channel restricted or cancelled.

Finally, in order to minimize the load on this thread, please continue to restrict your Tweets or place them under a MORE tag.

— Ron Unz

 
• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: Open Thread, Russia, Ukraine 
Hide 862 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. If we are opening with videos. This explains, in a humorous way, why major studio films are struggling.

    Warning: NSFW Language

    Sorry if this is a dupe. I do not always remember what has been previously shared.

    PEACE 😇

    • Replies: @Supply and Demand
    @A123

    Major film studios are only struggling with American audiences, who are low IQ, white, old, fat, and racist. Cecil B. DeMille and the rest of the Hollywood shlomos could've only imagined the Chinese market in their wildest dreams. It has never been a better time to make films. Those films just need to be on code with the CCP, which the tribe struggles with at times.

    They will learn.
    Or they will be replaced.
    Just like whitey.

    , @Wokechoke
    @A123

    That's Lenny Henry.

    A Black Numinorian?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y39d1fQqIXo


    still not funny, Lenny.

  2. Iraqi Information Minister reviews:

    The Occult in National Socialism;
    the Symbolic, Scientific, and Magical Influences on the Third Reich;
    Stephen Flowers Inner Tradition Press 2022.

    529 pages!

    This is a new and improved version of Nicholas Goodrick Clarke’s two books on this subject. If you read those and figured the topic was fully covered, you may be surprised. If nothing else, Flowers shows that the topic is large, the documentation to be explored is mountainous, and there is plenty of room for second and even more opinions. Flowers gets bogged down very little and I blasted through this sucker in four days. Lots of information new to me and great pictures.

    I will stuff the pictures under the [more].

    Summary of his argument: Goodrick Clarke’s books are really great but they are hampered by his ideology, with him being a member of the (cultural marxist) academic cult and the first book being a smoothed-out version of a PhD thesis which had to be tailored to a specific (and stupid) audience. Yes there were magical workings involved in National Socialist Hitler Germany. 99% of them are the same thing American et al advertisers and rulers are using right now. The idea that there is a German Paganism ideology that it is based on is: 1. wrong; and 2. a fabrication of the post 1945 Christian churches in Germany trying to say “It wasn’t us! we didn’t have anything to do with it.”

    This last point is the one thing Flowers gets bogged down inside of. It should suffice to most readers that the Roman Catholic church and the National Socialist Workers Party got along just splendid the entire time the NS’s were in power.

    In this vein he goes to great lengths to show the sizeable work of Himmler’s Ahnenerbe never amounted to more than a sideshow and had little consequence in things like invading the neighbors and murdering civilians.

    In his 2015 history of the SS, Bastian Hein astutely cites two major reasons as to why Himmler’s experiments in neopaganism generally failed: (1) Himmler himself was continually vacillating and in doubt about his own religious life or beliefs, and so presented no strong and unified message to his men and (2) Himmler and Rosenberg were undermined and not supported from above, as the Fuhrer publicly and privately ridiculed the effort and often intervened on the behalf of traditional church interests for larger political reasons. p. 278

    (The percentage numbers of German Pagans never amounted to a large amount.)

    The other big point that he hammers on is that the culture of NS Germany was not based on an ancestral German ethic nearly as much as it was patterned after ancient Rome. See above point about the brotherly relation between the Party and the RC Church.

    Images after the [more]: Wewelsberg, Saschenhain, Exernstein, MacKinder’s world island cartoon map,

    In terms of style he had a noteworthy sentence which might be the most beautiful left-hand compliment I have ever read.

    Heather Pringle’s 2008 work titled The Master Plan [long paragraph deleted] . . . Despite these shortcomings the book is a solid source for what the author has handpicked to discuss. p. 345

    There are a few errors that I saw. Most of these are trivial. The biggest problem that I see is that Professor Flowers is lacking in enough self-awareness to see that he also is a member of the academic cult. This shows up all over the place. Nevertheless the work is really tight in terms of sources and accurate citations and until shown otherwise I am pretty sure that he doesn’t just make stuff up.

    In 2022 on such a topic this is most unusual.

    [MORE]

    Wewelsberg Castle. Himmler’s Pagan monumental site. It was never fully renovated before 1945 happened.

    Saschsenhain. Legend has it Charlemagne executed 1500 Pagan chiefs here who refused his offer to convert to Christianity. It was renovated by the Ahnenerbe and still looks great today.

    Exernsteine. Ahnenerbe archaeologists excavated here for years and never found one scrap indicating it was an ancient cult site. Exernsteine is one of those locations that would look fantastic on google maps satellite 3D if that feature was working but alas no luck.

    MacKinder’s world island cartoon map. MacKinder’s writing is one of those things that Flowers casually dismisses because his denomination of the academy cult does so. Also he argues that NS Hitler paid no mind to this idea in practice at all and the lebensraum thing was far more modest and practical. There are bookshelves of arguments contrary to this so if you are not interested in this topic at all you will be doing some rapid skimming over the Flowers spin on a bunch of this material.

    Despite shortcomings this book is a solid source!

    • Thanks: Bashibuzuk, Barbarossa
    • Replies: @Coconuts
    @Emil Nikola Richard


    The idea that there is a German Paganism ideology that it is based on is: 1. wrong; and 2. a fabrication of the post 1945 Christian churches in Germany trying to say “It wasn’t us! we didn’t have anything to do with it.
     
    I can speculate as to why this point might need a lot of arguing; churches can always say 'We always believed God was a Jew and we always taught that everyone should worship this Semite' to point to tensions between Nazi ideology and Christianity.

    The other big point that he hammers on is that the culture of NS Germany was not based on an ancestral German ethic nearly as much as it was patterned after ancient Rome. See above point about the brotherly relation between the Party and the RC Church.
     
    The point that the main inspiration for the Catholic Church came from Ancient Rome and not the Middle East might require lengthy arguments. Is there an underlying argument that Semitic and Judeo-Hellenic influences were stronger in Nazism than the ancestral German ethic?

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Beckow

  3. Bashibuzuk says:

    To follow up on the Solutrean hypothesis for the peopling of North America that S started discussing on the previous thread: I never really dug much deeper than the superficial and politically correct reports about the Kennewick man and the Anzik-1 skeleton being ancestral to the modern Native American populations. Despite their distinctive phenotypic features, the genetics seemed not distinctive enough to put these “phenotypic outliers” in another genetic lineage.

    But given that I am such a nerd and a geek about the population genetics (at an amateur level), I wanted to look into what was written about the Solutrean genetics. And then I found this:

    Consistent with our recent finding of a close relationship between South Pacific populations and Denisovans or Neanderthals who were archaic Africans with Eurasian admixtures, the ∼9500 year old Kennewick Man skeleton with Australo-Melanesian affinity from North America was about equally related to Europeans and Africans, least related to East Asians among present-day people, and most related to the ∼42000 year old Neanderthal Mezmaiskaya-2 from Adygea Russia among ancient Eurasian DNAs. The ∼12700 year old Anzick-1 of the Clovis culture was most related to the ∼18720 year old El Miron of the Magdalenian culture in Spain among ancient DNAs. Amerindian mtDNA haplotypes, unlike their Eurasian sister haplotypes, share informative SNPs with Australo-Melanesians, Africans, or Neanderthals. These results suggest a unifying account of informative findings on the settlement of the Americas.

    https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/130989v3

    Which is absolutely amazing…

    If the authors wouldn’t have been Chinese scientists, it would have been either acclaimed or most probably screechingly decried with much gnashing of teeth. But given the ethnic origin of the authors, it seems to have past unnoticed or most probably have been ignored by the “polically correct” academic researchers.

    The paper didn’t make it further than bioArXive, and I think I know a couple of reasons why.

  4. Chinese official historiography describes the Great Steppe impact on the Han accross millenia

    This is a sensitive topic and subjective to political correctness. The Chinese after all, invented the Pravda

    also known as the Orthodox Histories (Chinese: 正史; pinyin: Zhèngshǐ), are the Chinese official dynastic histories covering from the earliest dynasty in 3000 BC to the Ming dynasty in the 17th century.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty-Four_Histories

    One of the techniques is to emphasize the continuity of Chinese dynasties but obfuscate the continuity of Tatar dynasties by using different cognates:

    – Altan is the same word as Aisin-Gioro, the clan name of Qing emperors. Same for the word Khitan. Golden Horde, etc.

    – Xiongnu is the same word as Aisin-Gioro Xuanye, the Kangxi Emperor. And the Yellow Emperor’s given name Xuānyuán

    Another technique is the actual names of Tatar dynasties are obfuscated:

    – 元 Yuan is actually Dai Ön Yeqe Mongɣul Ulus meaning “Great Yuan – Great Mongol State”
    – 清 Qing is actually Daicing gurun “warrior state”

    The only ever female emperor Wu Zetian (a Han-Xianbei who’s depicted with blue eyes), was a consort of the two previous emperors, son and father, this would considered blasphemous in Han (or Christian) culture but perfectly acceptable by Eurasian nomads.

    North Eurasian cultures share a common reverence for bears, which is a common surname:

    Xiong, Bernard, Arthur, Ursula, Urs, Ursicinus, Orsolya, Björn, Nedved, Medvedev, and Otso.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurasian_brown_bear#Cultural_depictions

    The mythical progenitor of China, Yellow Emperor, is said to have led the tribe 有熊 Yǒu Xíong “Possessor of Bears”. So he was very likely some kind of proto-Genghis Khan,

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellow_Emperor#Xuanyuan_and_Youxiong

    the nomadic hordes were in fact meritocratic confederations in which the “alien” or foreign ethnic groups might climb to the top.

    Very much so. The normie take is:

    Japanese: China had lost its character through the Tatar invasion, thus we are the authentic descendant of Classical Chinese civilization

    Chinese: the barbarians had accepted our culture, but the Han Chinese dynasties Song and Ming are truly authentic and its traditions should be restored

    Red Pill take: Mongol Yuan didn’t institute horrible physical punishments on Confucian scholars, Ming did. Song was culturally accomplished for its time but rife with internal bureaucratic infighting, corruption, and military ineptness.

    Han Chinese perform at its best when ruled or have its institution set by foreign races– HK, Singapore, Taiwan.

    And Mongols Manchus gave Han equal status when demonstrated to perform with martial ethos,

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Köke_Temür
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kong_Youde

    • Thanks: Thulean Friend, Bashibuzuk
    • Replies: @Bashibuzuk
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    Have you ever had the possibility to read Lev Gumilyov's studies on the history of the Great Steppe nomads?

    And as a present to thank you for you kind explanation on the Han Chinese take on history of the Greater Chinese Realm (an expression I have just coined ad hoc) please have a look at this when you have some time to spend on long gone mighty tribes heritage:

    https://depts.washington.edu/silkroad/museums/shm/shmnoinula.html

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noin-Ula_burial_site

    https://indo-european.eu/2020/08/xiongnu-ancestry-connects-huns-avars-to-scytho-siberians/

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/89/Noin-Ula_carpet.jpg

    I would one day perhaps write about my own pet theories on the possible influence of Huns on the "historical coming out" of the Slav from "the Pripyat' closet". Of course, nothing scientific or proven and even less so official...

    🙂

    Replies: @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

  5. The future of America will either be 19th century Germany or East Africa. Or both.

    [MORE]

    • Replies: @AP
    @Thulean Friend

    Yiddish speakers have their roots in the Pale.

    Also Mormons aren’t counted as an ethnicity but their TFR is above 2.00 (around 3.00 IIRC).

    Replies: @songbird, @Mikel

  6. Some things never change —

  7. Splendidly excellent stuff –

  8. The Wishful Theory of ‘Strategic Russian Defeat
    https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2022-10-19/strategic-russian-defeat-is-not-a-viable-solution-to-the-war-in-ukraine

    ####

    Some feedback from elsewhere:

    I’m seeing more and more ‘anal-y-ses’ & ‘opinions’ in the PPNN about the Ukraine that are even more vague than normal. You are left with the impression that the author wants to say something but the author themselves have not thought through what it is they even want to say. Technically it is ‘content’ but it provides nothing new, either in insight, information or anything else. I guess what we can say is that now that it is clear to most of these idiots that the Ukraine will not win, they are forced in to unfamiliar territory that they have not considered and are lost in the woods. I expect more of this thrashing about to come.

    &

    Also, as soon as I got to this sentence, I stopped reading:

    “Fiona Hill, one of the most respected Russia experts in the US and a former Russia guru in the Trump administration, offered a less radical version of the same argument in a recent interview with Politico.”

    If Bershidsky rates Hill as ‘one of the most respected Russia experts’, that’s all I need to know. Fiona Hill could find a samovar in the space where she left her car when she was ready to go home, and she would only mutter peevishly, “What’s this big stupid brass car doing here, my key won’t fit it”. She is a simpleton in every derogatory sense of the word, I would have thought Bershidsky was too intelligent to fall for her mad ravings. Perhaps his hatred for Putin has overcome his judgement.

    • Replies: @Pixo
    @Mikhail

    That’s a good and balanced article.

    Russia has already been defeated, its reputation, influence in the West, economy and military have been permanently damaged.

    As much as I am on the side of Ukraine, it isn’t comfortable to be on the same side as the MIC Russia-haters.

    Now seems a good time for us to be a gracious winner and negotiate something reasonable.

    Replies: @LatW, @Mikhail

  9. @Emil Nikola Richard
    Iraqi Information Minister reviews:

    The Occult in National Socialism;
    the Symbolic, Scientific, and Magical Influences on the Third Reich;
    Stephen Flowers Inner Tradition Press 2022.

    529 pages!

    This is a new and improved version of Nicholas Goodrick Clarke's two books on this subject. If you read those and figured the topic was fully covered, you may be surprised. If nothing else, Flowers shows that the topic is large, the documentation to be explored is mountainous, and there is plenty of room for second and even more opinions. Flowers gets bogged down very little and I blasted through this sucker in four days. Lots of information new to me and great pictures.

    I will stuff the pictures under the [more].

    Summary of his argument: Goodrick Clarke's books are really great but they are hampered by his ideology, with him being a member of the (cultural marxist) academic cult and the first book being a smoothed-out version of a PhD thesis which had to be tailored to a specific (and stupid) audience. Yes there were magical workings involved in National Socialist Hitler Germany. 99% of them are the same thing American et al advertisers and rulers are using right now. The idea that there is a German Paganism ideology that it is based on is: 1. wrong; and 2. a fabrication of the post 1945 Christian churches in Germany trying to say "It wasn't us! we didn't have anything to do with it."

    This last point is the one thing Flowers gets bogged down inside of. It should suffice to most readers that the Roman Catholic church and the National Socialist Workers Party got along just splendid the entire time the NS's were in power.

    In this vein he goes to great lengths to show the sizeable work of Himmler's Ahnenerbe never amounted to more than a sideshow and had little consequence in things like invading the neighbors and murdering civilians.


    In his 2015 history of the SS, Bastian Hein astutely cites two major reasons as to why Himmler's experiments in neopaganism generally failed: (1) Himmler himself was continually vacillating and in doubt about his own religious life or beliefs, and so presented no strong and unified message to his men and (2) Himmler and Rosenberg were undermined and not supported from above, as the Fuhrer publicly and privately ridiculed the effort and often intervened on the behalf of traditional church interests for larger political reasons. p. 278
     
    (The percentage numbers of German Pagans never amounted to a large amount.)

    The other big point that he hammers on is that the culture of NS Germany was not based on an ancestral German ethic nearly as much as it was patterned after ancient Rome. See above point about the brotherly relation between the Party and the RC Church.

    Images after the [more]: Wewelsberg, Saschenhain, Exernstein, MacKinder's world island cartoon map,

    In terms of style he had a noteworthy sentence which might be the most beautiful left-hand compliment I have ever read.


    Heather Pringle's 2008 work titled The Master Plan [long paragraph deleted] . . . Despite these shortcomings the book is a solid source for what the author has handpicked to discuss. p. 345
     
    There are a few errors that I saw. Most of these are trivial. The biggest problem that I see is that Professor Flowers is lacking in enough self-awareness to see that he also is a member of the academic cult. This shows up all over the place. Nevertheless the work is really tight in terms of sources and accurate citations and until shown otherwise I am pretty sure that he doesn't just make stuff up.

    In 2022 on such a topic this is most unusual.

    Wewelsberg Castle. Himmler's Pagan monumental site. It was never fully renovated before 1945 happened.

    https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2010/04/20/article-0-0925FA2B000005DC-741_634x384.jpg

    Saschsenhain. Legend has it Charlemagne executed 1500 Pagan chiefs here who refused his offer to convert to Christianity. It was renovated by the Ahnenerbe and still looks great today.

    https://paganplaces.com/wp-content/uploads/jet-engine-forms/6/2020/08/saxon-grove.jpg

    Exernsteine. Ahnenerbe archaeologists excavated here for years and never found one scrap indicating it was an ancient cult site. Exernsteine is one of those locations that would look fantastic on google maps satellite 3D if that feature was working but alas no luck.

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/22/Externsteine_pano.jpg

    MacKinder's world island cartoon map. MacKinder's writing is one of those things that Flowers casually dismisses because his denomination of the academy cult does so. Also he argues that NS Hitler paid no mind to this idea in practice at all and the lebensraum thing was far more modest and practical. There are bookshelves of arguments contrary to this so if you are not interested in this topic at all you will be doing some rapid skimming over the Flowers spin on a bunch of this material.

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/9c/Heartland.png/500px-Heartland.png

    Despite shortcomings this book is a solid source!

    Replies: @Coconuts

    The idea that there is a German Paganism ideology that it is based on is: 1. wrong; and 2. a fabrication of the post 1945 Christian churches in Germany trying to say “It wasn’t us! we didn’t have anything to do with it.

    I can speculate as to why this point might need a lot of arguing; churches can always say ‘We always believed God was a Jew and we always taught that everyone should worship this Semite’ to point to tensions between Nazi ideology and Christianity.

    The other big point that he hammers on is that the culture of NS Germany was not based on an ancestral German ethic nearly as much as it was patterned after ancient Rome. See above point about the brotherly relation between the Party and the RC Church.

    The point that the main inspiration for the Catholic Church came from Ancient Rome and not the Middle East might require lengthy arguments. Is there an underlying argument that Semitic and Judeo-Hellenic influences were stronger in Nazism than the ancestral German ethic?

    • Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Coconuts


    I can speculate as to why this point might need a lot of arguing; churches can always say ‘We always believed God was a Jew and we always taught that everyone should worship this Semite’ to point to tensions between Nazi ideology and Christianity.

     

    The most virulent anti-semitic-Christian-Nazis (there were 70 million diverse Germans) had an Aryan Jesus.

    Is there an underlying argument that Semitic and Judeo-Hellenic influences were stronger in Nazism than the ancestral German ethic?
     
    The book is 500pp +.

    This exact argument is the largest element in it, or at least very close to the largest element in it. This is a subjective call but in my view that is one heck of a lot of arguing. There is an endlessly fascinating amount of material here and I could have gotten through it in one sitting but for the tedious polemical tone.

    The Nazi salute is a Roman salute. Does anybody know what the old Norskis did for saluting?

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

    , @Beckow
    @Coconuts

    In retrospect it looks like the ancestral German ethic was mostly aspirational. The much deeper, habitual, institutional culture was not changed. It takes much longer than even 2-3 generations. There is a stickiness to the Middle-East-Hellenes-Rome derived culture that many have underestimated.

    Actually by far the most successful has been the American onslaught that uses primarily comfort and ease. The aspirational stuff has to imposed either by force or with discipline - it is a tough sell. Take two 5-year olds and offer candy vs. almost anything else, the overwhelming choice is the more pleasant, easier one. People crave it.

    The problem is that once you start descend down the staircase to the lazy, low-bar, comfortable survival there is no way back. A few more steps...and nobody is climbing back up.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Wokechoke

  10. @Thulean Friend
    The future of America will either be 19th century Germany or East Africa. Or both.

    https://twitter.com/BirthGauge/status/1583095374654283776

    Replies: @AP

    Yiddish speakers have their roots in the Pale.

    Also Mormons aren’t counted as an ethnicity but their TFR is above 2.00 (around 3.00 IIRC).

    • Replies: @songbird
    @AP

    Haven't known too many, so my sampling might be biased, but I've found them to be very congenial.

    I've wondered whether this might be some form of self-selection. I'm sure something goes into it in a general, but it could be the ones that move East are really outgoing or something.

    But I've also wondered if it is the short genetic distance. They tend to be of British and Irish heritage. (Though, of course, I don't uniformly like all such people.)
     
     

    , @Mikel
    @AP


    Also M------s aren’t counted as an ethnicity but their TFR is above 2.00 (around 3.00 IIRC).
     
    I hesitate to discuss the M religion in this thread again but that low figure has always appeared very iffy to me. I'm pretty sure it's higher among the practicing ones.

    Replies: @A123, @AP

  11. Bashibuzuk says:
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    Chinese official historiography describes the Great Steppe impact on the Han accross millenia
     
    This is a sensitive topic and subjective to political correctness. The Chinese after all, invented the Pravda

    also known as the Orthodox Histories (Chinese: 正史; pinyin: Zhèngshǐ), are the Chinese official dynastic histories covering from the earliest dynasty in 3000 BC to the Ming dynasty in the 17th century.
     
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty-Four_Histories

    One of the techniques is to emphasize the continuity of Chinese dynasties but obfuscate the continuity of Tatar dynasties by using different cognates:

    - Altan is the same word as Aisin-Gioro, the clan name of Qing emperors. Same for the word Khitan. Golden Horde, etc.

    - Xiongnu is the same word as Aisin-Gioro Xuanye, the Kangxi Emperor. And the Yellow Emperor's given name Xuānyuán

    Another technique is the actual names of Tatar dynasties are obfuscated:

    - 元 Yuan is actually Dai Ön Yeqe Mongɣul Ulus meaning "Great Yuan – Great Mongol State"
    - 清 Qing is actually Daicing gurun "warrior state"

    The only ever female emperor Wu Zetian (a Han-Xianbei who's depicted with blue eyes), was a consort of the two previous emperors, son and father, this would considered blasphemous in Han (or Christian) culture but perfectly acceptable by Eurasian nomads.

    North Eurasian cultures share a common reverence for bears, which is a common surname:


    Xiong, Bernard, Arthur, Ursula, Urs, Ursicinus, Orsolya, Björn, Nedved, Medvedev, and Otso.

     

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurasian_brown_bear#Cultural_depictions

    The mythical progenitor of China, Yellow Emperor, is said to have led the tribe 有熊 Yǒu Xíong “Possessor of Bears”. So he was very likely some kind of proto-Genghis Khan,

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellow_Emperor#Xuanyuan_and_Youxiong


    the nomadic hordes were in fact meritocratic confederations in which the “alien” or foreign ethnic groups might climb to the top.

     

    Very much so. The normie take is:

    Japanese: China had lost its character through the Tatar invasion, thus we are the authentic descendant of Classical Chinese civilization

    Chinese: the barbarians had accepted our culture, but the Han Chinese dynasties Song and Ming are truly authentic and its traditions should be restored

    Red Pill take: Mongol Yuan didn't institute horrible physical punishments on Confucian scholars, Ming did. Song was culturally accomplished for its time but rife with internal bureaucratic infighting, corruption, and military ineptness.

    Han Chinese perform at its best when ruled or have its institution set by foreign races-- HK, Singapore, Taiwan.

    And Mongols Manchus gave Han equal status when demonstrated to perform with martial ethos,

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Köke_Temür
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kong_Youde

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

    Have you ever had the possibility to read Lev Gumilyov’s studies on the history of the Great Steppe nomads?

    And as a present to thank you for you kind explanation on the Han Chinese take on history of the Greater Chinese Realm (an expression I have just coined ad hoc) please have a look at this when you have some time to spend on long gone mighty tribes heritage:

    https://depts.washington.edu/silkroad/museums/shm/shmnoinula.html

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noin-Ula_burial_site

    https://indo-european.eu/2020/08/xiongnu-ancestry-connects-huns-avars-to-scytho-siberians/

    I would one day perhaps write about my own pet theories on the possible influence of Huns on the “historical coming out” of the Slav from “the Pripyat’ closet”. Of course, nothing scientific or proven and even less so official…

    🙂

    • Replies: @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    @Bashibuzuk

    Thanks. In official history Sima Qian's Records of the Grand Historian (c. 91 BC), Xiongnu is said to have descended from the son of the last king of Xia dynasty. His name is probably a cognate of Chanyu.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chunwei

    Xia (c. 2070 BC–c. 1600 BC) is the first dynasty in official historiography and has not been verified by archeology and archeogenetics. So they may have been Eurasian nomads. They were also roughly contemporaneous with Yamnaya expansion.

    Xia got kicked out of Central Plains by Shang and became nomads again. This is the exact parallel of the Mongol Yuan getting kicked out of Central Plains by Ming, 2900 years later, retreating the steppes and founding the Northern Yuan.

    The Anglosphere gets hanged up on a sharp division between East and West Eurasians, but Eurasian nomads should have always been a mix of Europoid and Mongloid features, like Putin and Shoigu.

    I'm familiar with Gumilyov who's gone beyond Chinese historians on studies of Eurasian nomads. I guess that made him persona non grata (?) because it offended ROC and PRC's claim on Inner Asia territories. He's done extensive work on Xianbei who has the same golden ornaments as Indo-Iranian Scythians, Yuechi, etc.
    https://i.postimg.cc/HxbyTT81/Belt-Buckle-Xianbei3-4thcentury.jpg
    https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Сяньби

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

  12. @Coconuts
    @Emil Nikola Richard


    The idea that there is a German Paganism ideology that it is based on is: 1. wrong; and 2. a fabrication of the post 1945 Christian churches in Germany trying to say “It wasn’t us! we didn’t have anything to do with it.
     
    I can speculate as to why this point might need a lot of arguing; churches can always say 'We always believed God was a Jew and we always taught that everyone should worship this Semite' to point to tensions between Nazi ideology and Christianity.

    The other big point that he hammers on is that the culture of NS Germany was not based on an ancestral German ethic nearly as much as it was patterned after ancient Rome. See above point about the brotherly relation between the Party and the RC Church.
     
    The point that the main inspiration for the Catholic Church came from Ancient Rome and not the Middle East might require lengthy arguments. Is there an underlying argument that Semitic and Judeo-Hellenic influences were stronger in Nazism than the ancestral German ethic?

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Beckow

    I can speculate as to why this point might need a lot of arguing; churches can always say ‘We always believed God was a Jew and we always taught that everyone should worship this Semite’ to point to tensions between Nazi ideology and Christianity.

    The most virulent anti-semitic-Christian-Nazis (there were 70 million diverse Germans) had an Aryan Jesus.

    Is there an underlying argument that Semitic and Judeo-Hellenic influences were stronger in Nazism than the ancestral German ethic?

    The book is 500pp +.

    This exact argument is the largest element in it, or at least very close to the largest element in it. This is a subjective call but in my view that is one heck of a lot of arguing. There is an endlessly fascinating amount of material here and I could have gotten through it in one sitting but for the tedious polemical tone.

    The Nazi salute is a Roman salute. Does anybody know what the old Norskis did for saluting?

    • Replies: @Bashibuzuk
    @Emil Nikola Richard


    old Norskis did for saluting
     
    По рукам!

    It means let's hit/shake hands! It also means deal!

    This expression in Russian language is quite old.

    Perhaps when they shook hands, they also hailed each other...

  13. @AP
    @Thulean Friend

    Yiddish speakers have their roots in the Pale.

    Also Mormons aren’t counted as an ethnicity but their TFR is above 2.00 (around 3.00 IIRC).

    Replies: @songbird, @Mikel

    Haven't known too many, so my sampling might be biased, but I've found them to be very congenial.

    I've wondered whether this might be some form of self-selection. I'm sure something goes into it in a general, but it could be the ones that move East are really outgoing or something.

    But I've also wondered if it is the short genetic distance. They tend to be of British and Irish heritage. (Though, of course, I don't uniformly like all such people.)

  14. @AP
    @Thulean Friend

    Yiddish speakers have their roots in the Pale.

    Also Mormons aren’t counted as an ethnicity but their TFR is above 2.00 (around 3.00 IIRC).

    Replies: @songbird, @Mikel

    Also M——s aren’t counted as an ethnicity but their TFR is above 2.00 (around 3.00 IIRC).

    I hesitate to discuss the M religion in this thread again but that low figure has always appeared very iffy to me. I’m pretty sure it’s higher among the practicing ones.

    • Replies: @A123
    @Mikel



    I hesitate to discuss the M religion in this thread again but that low figure has always appeared very iffy to me. I’m pretty sure it’s higher among the practicing ones.
     
    The M religion... the Somali one... That M Religion?

    [MORE]

    Which M? !!!!

    PEACE 😇



    https://cdn.lifehack.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/cat-chasing-laser.gif

    Replies: @Mikel

    , @AP
    @Mikel

    I looked it up and it’s apparently 3.4.

    I looked at the Reddit Dmitry posted about the strange activities. They are indeed bizarre but seem to highlight the importance on fertility not necessarily sex (genital anointing). The Puritans from whom the Mormons sprang engaged in all sorts of bizarre “cult-like” behaviors:



    A typical Massachusetts week would begin in the church, which doubled as the town meeting hall. There were no decorations except a giant staring eye on the pulpit to remind churchgoers that God was watching them. Townspeople would stand up before their and declare their shame and misdeeds, sometimes being forced to literally crawl before the other worshippers begging for forgiveness. Then the minister would give two two-hour sermons back to back

    Everyone was compelled by law to live in families. Town officials would search the town for single people and, if found, order them to join a family; if they refused, they were sent to jail.

    98% of adult Puritan men were married, compared to only 73% of adult Englishmen in general. Women were under special pressure to marry, and a Puritan proverb said that “women dying maids lead apes in Hell”.

    The average family size in Waltham, Massachusetts in the 1730s was 9.7 children.

    Puritan parents traditionally would send children away to be raised with other families, and raise those families’ children in turn, in the hopes that the lack of familiarity would make the child behave better.

    In 1692, 25% of women over age 45 in Essex County were accused of witchcraft.

    Wasting time in Massachusetts was literally a criminal offense, listed in the law code, and several people were in fact prosecuted for it.

    Another law just said “If any man shall exceed the bounds of moderation, we shall punish him severely”.

    Here was have literacy for the purpose of social control:

    Massachusetts passed the first law mandating universal public education, which was called The Old Deluder Satan Law in honor of its preamble, which began “It being one chief project of that old deluder, Satan, to keep men from the knowledge of the scriptures…”

    Replies: @songbird, @John Gruskos

  15. @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Coconuts


    I can speculate as to why this point might need a lot of arguing; churches can always say ‘We always believed God was a Jew and we always taught that everyone should worship this Semite’ to point to tensions between Nazi ideology and Christianity.

     

    The most virulent anti-semitic-Christian-Nazis (there were 70 million diverse Germans) had an Aryan Jesus.

    Is there an underlying argument that Semitic and Judeo-Hellenic influences were stronger in Nazism than the ancestral German ethic?
     
    The book is 500pp +.

    This exact argument is the largest element in it, or at least very close to the largest element in it. This is a subjective call but in my view that is one heck of a lot of arguing. There is an endlessly fascinating amount of material here and I could have gotten through it in one sitting but for the tedious polemical tone.

    The Nazi salute is a Roman salute. Does anybody know what the old Norskis did for saluting?

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

    old Norskis did for saluting

    По рукам!

    It means let’s hit/shake hands! It also means deal!

    This expression in Russian language is quite old.

    Perhaps when they shook hands, they also hailed each other…

  16. @A123
    If we are opening with videos. This explains, in a humorous way, why major studio films are struggling.

    Warning: NSFW Language

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ngqO9Hp19_4

    Sorry if this is a dupe. I do not always remember what has been previously shared.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @Supply and Demand, @Wokechoke

    Major film studios are only struggling with American audiences, who are low IQ, white, old, fat, and racist. Cecil B. DeMille and the rest of the Hollywood shlomos could’ve only imagined the Chinese market in their wildest dreams. It has never been a better time to make films. Those films just need to be on code with the CCP, which the tribe struggles with at times.

    They will learn.
    Or they will be replaced.
    Just like whitey.

  17. @Coconuts
    @Emil Nikola Richard


    The idea that there is a German Paganism ideology that it is based on is: 1. wrong; and 2. a fabrication of the post 1945 Christian churches in Germany trying to say “It wasn’t us! we didn’t have anything to do with it.
     
    I can speculate as to why this point might need a lot of arguing; churches can always say 'We always believed God was a Jew and we always taught that everyone should worship this Semite' to point to tensions between Nazi ideology and Christianity.

    The other big point that he hammers on is that the culture of NS Germany was not based on an ancestral German ethic nearly as much as it was patterned after ancient Rome. See above point about the brotherly relation between the Party and the RC Church.
     
    The point that the main inspiration for the Catholic Church came from Ancient Rome and not the Middle East might require lengthy arguments. Is there an underlying argument that Semitic and Judeo-Hellenic influences were stronger in Nazism than the ancestral German ethic?

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Beckow

    In retrospect it looks like the ancestral German ethic was mostly aspirational. The much deeper, habitual, institutional culture was not changed. It takes much longer than even 2-3 generations. There is a stickiness to the Middle-East-Hellenes-Rome derived culture that many have underestimated.

    Actually by far the most successful has been the American onslaught that uses primarily comfort and ease. The aspirational stuff has to imposed either by force or with discipline – it is a tough sell. Take two 5-year olds and offer candy vs. almost anything else, the overwhelming choice is the more pleasant, easier one. People crave it.

    The problem is that once you start descend down the staircase to the lazy, low-bar, comfortable survival there is no way back. A few more steps…and nobody is climbing back up.

    • Agree: Bashibuzuk
    • Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Beckow

    There is a minority who craves stuff like running marathons.

    The freaky will inherit the earth. That first bench press is torture. But soon enough you just might find yourself structuring the intervening time periods around reliable steady recovery for that next go. : )

    I knew a guy in college who could do > 10 one arm pull ups. It was not human. His nickname was the monkey.

    , @Wokechoke
    @Beckow

    America is in many ways the dream of the peasant labouring in the middle ages before the modern age. A house warm, a car that moves, a TV glowing, a fridge full etc.

  18. @Mikel
    @AP


    Also M------s aren’t counted as an ethnicity but their TFR is above 2.00 (around 3.00 IIRC).
     
    I hesitate to discuss the M religion in this thread again but that low figure has always appeared very iffy to me. I'm pretty sure it's higher among the practicing ones.

    Replies: @A123, @AP

    I hesitate to discuss the M religion in this thread again but that low figure has always appeared very iffy to me. I’m pretty sure it’s higher among the practicing ones.

    The M religion… the Somali one… That M Religion?

    [MORE]

    Which M? !!!!

    PEACE 😇

    [MORE]

    • Replies: @Mikel
    @A123


    Which M? !!!!
     
    The Melkites, of course. Didn't you see how people got all worked up about Melkites in the previous thread?

    Replies: @Barbarossa, @Yevardian

  19. @Mikel
    @AP


    Also M------s aren’t counted as an ethnicity but their TFR is above 2.00 (around 3.00 IIRC).
     
    I hesitate to discuss the M religion in this thread again but that low figure has always appeared very iffy to me. I'm pretty sure it's higher among the practicing ones.

    Replies: @A123, @AP

    I looked it up and it’s apparently 3.4.

    I looked at the Reddit Dmitry posted about the strange activities. They are indeed bizarre but seem to highlight the importance on fertility not necessarily sex (genital anointing). The Puritans from whom the Mormons sprang engaged in all sorts of bizarre “cult-like” behaviors:

    [MORE]

    A typical Massachusetts week would begin in the church, which doubled as the town meeting hall. There were no decorations except a giant staring eye on the pulpit to remind churchgoers that God was watching them. Townspeople would stand up before their and declare their shame and misdeeds, sometimes being forced to literally crawl before the other worshippers begging for forgiveness. Then the minister would give two two-hour sermons back to back

    Everyone was compelled by law to live in families. Town officials would search the town for single people and, if found, order them to join a family; if they refused, they were sent to jail.

    98% of adult Puritan men were married, compared to only 73% of adult Englishmen in general. Women were under special pressure to marry, and a Puritan proverb said that “women dying maids lead apes in Hell”.

    The average family size in Waltham, Massachusetts in the 1730s was 9.7 children.

    Puritan parents traditionally would send children away to be raised with other families, and raise those families’ children in turn, in the hopes that the lack of familiarity would make the child behave better.

    In 1692, 25% of women over age 45 in Essex County were accused of witchcraft.

    Wasting time in Massachusetts was literally a criminal offense, listed in the law code, and several people were in fact prosecuted for it.

    Another law just said “If any man shall exceed the bounds of moderation, we shall punish him severely”.

    Here was have literacy for the purpose of social control:

    Massachusetts passed the first law mandating universal public education, which was called The Old Deluder Satan Law in honor of its preamble, which began “It being one chief project of that old deluder, Satan, to keep men from the knowledge of the scriptures…”

    • Replies: @songbird
    @AP

    In one of those old cemeteries near Boston Common, there is a grave that has the name "Increase" on it.

    Replies: @Finn

    , @John Gruskos
    @AP

    Thanks for reminding me how awesome colonial America was.

    Prouder than ever to be an American, which is why the American flag is the only flag I will ever fly.

  20. @Beckow
    @Coconuts

    In retrospect it looks like the ancestral German ethic was mostly aspirational. The much deeper, habitual, institutional culture was not changed. It takes much longer than even 2-3 generations. There is a stickiness to the Middle-East-Hellenes-Rome derived culture that many have underestimated.

    Actually by far the most successful has been the American onslaught that uses primarily comfort and ease. The aspirational stuff has to imposed either by force or with discipline - it is a tough sell. Take two 5-year olds and offer candy vs. almost anything else, the overwhelming choice is the more pleasant, easier one. People crave it.

    The problem is that once you start descend down the staircase to the lazy, low-bar, comfortable survival there is no way back. A few more steps...and nobody is climbing back up.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Wokechoke

    There is a minority who craves stuff like running marathons.

    The freaky will inherit the earth. That first bench press is torture. But soon enough you just might find yourself structuring the intervening time periods around reliable steady recovery for that next go. : )

    I knew a guy in college who could do > 10 one arm pull ups. It was not human. His nickname was the monkey.

  21. @A123
    @Mikel



    I hesitate to discuss the M religion in this thread again but that low figure has always appeared very iffy to me. I’m pretty sure it’s higher among the practicing ones.
     
    The M religion... the Somali one... That M Religion?

    [MORE]

    Which M? !!!!

    PEACE 😇



    https://cdn.lifehack.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/cat-chasing-laser.gif

    Replies: @Mikel

    Which M? !!!!

    The Melkites, of course. Didn’t you see how people got all worked up about Melkites in the previous thread?

    • Agree: Bashibuzuk
    • LOL: A123
    • Replies: @Barbarossa
    @Mikel

    Dang, how'd I miss that?! It would have been right up my alley!

    I thought he was talking about either Manicheanism or Masons!

    Replies: @A123

    , @Yevardian
    @Mikel

    Must have missed that. In private conversation Armenians often call westerners in general 'Melkites', though of course the word just means any Roman (Chalcedonian) Christian. Etymology comes from the Semitic root for 'king', i.e, the emperor.

    Replies: @Barbarossa

  22. @Mikel
    @A123


    Which M? !!!!
     
    The Melkites, of course. Didn't you see how people got all worked up about Melkites in the previous thread?

    Replies: @Barbarossa, @Yevardian

    Dang, how’d I miss that?! It would have been right up my alley!

    I thought he was talking about either Manicheanism or Masons!

    • Replies: @A123
    @Barbarossa

    Does anyone know about the Marmites? Are they from New Zealand?

    Apparently, they have mental hygiene criteria and operate the Sanitarium Health and Wellbeing Company.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @Barbarossa

  23. @AP
    @Mikel

    I looked it up and it’s apparently 3.4.

    I looked at the Reddit Dmitry posted about the strange activities. They are indeed bizarre but seem to highlight the importance on fertility not necessarily sex (genital anointing). The Puritans from whom the Mormons sprang engaged in all sorts of bizarre “cult-like” behaviors:



    A typical Massachusetts week would begin in the church, which doubled as the town meeting hall. There were no decorations except a giant staring eye on the pulpit to remind churchgoers that God was watching them. Townspeople would stand up before their and declare their shame and misdeeds, sometimes being forced to literally crawl before the other worshippers begging for forgiveness. Then the minister would give two two-hour sermons back to back

    Everyone was compelled by law to live in families. Town officials would search the town for single people and, if found, order them to join a family; if they refused, they were sent to jail.

    98% of adult Puritan men were married, compared to only 73% of adult Englishmen in general. Women were under special pressure to marry, and a Puritan proverb said that “women dying maids lead apes in Hell”.

    The average family size in Waltham, Massachusetts in the 1730s was 9.7 children.

    Puritan parents traditionally would send children away to be raised with other families, and raise those families’ children in turn, in the hopes that the lack of familiarity would make the child behave better.

    In 1692, 25% of women over age 45 in Essex County were accused of witchcraft.

    Wasting time in Massachusetts was literally a criminal offense, listed in the law code, and several people were in fact prosecuted for it.

    Another law just said “If any man shall exceed the bounds of moderation, we shall punish him severely”.

    Here was have literacy for the purpose of social control:

    Massachusetts passed the first law mandating universal public education, which was called The Old Deluder Satan Law in honor of its preamble, which began “It being one chief project of that old deluder, Satan, to keep men from the knowledge of the scriptures…”

    Replies: @songbird, @John Gruskos

    In one of those old cemeteries near Boston Common, there is a grave that has the name “Increase” on it.

    • Replies: @Finn
    @songbird

    And what about Increase Mather? What about his son Cotton? My family name sake.

    Replies: @songbird

  24. @Barbarossa
    @Mikel

    Dang, how'd I miss that?! It would have been right up my alley!

    I thought he was talking about either Manicheanism or Masons!

    Replies: @A123

    Does anyone know about the Marmites? Are they from New Zealand?

    Apparently, they have mental hygiene criteria and operate the Sanitarium Health and Wellbeing Company.

    PEACE 😇

    • Replies: @Barbarossa
    @A123

    I've heard of the Aussie spread called Marmite but never of any group named that. It appears that the Sanitarium Health and Wellbeing Company is actually a Seventh Day Adventist project.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanitarium_Health_and_Wellbeing_Company

    I suppose that might be better than being a wholly owned Metallica Health and Wellbeing Company...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V6Dfo4zDduI

    Replies: @A123

  25. @Mikel
    @A123


    Which M? !!!!
     
    The Melkites, of course. Didn't you see how people got all worked up about Melkites in the previous thread?

    Replies: @Barbarossa, @Yevardian

    Must have missed that. In private conversation Armenians often call westerners in general ‘Melkites’, though of course the word just means any Roman (Chalcedonian) Christian. Etymology comes from the Semitic root for ‘king’, i.e, the emperor.

    • Replies: @Barbarossa
    @Yevardian


    In private conversation Armenians often call westerners in general ‘Melkites’,
     
    That is interesting. I actually attend a Melkite Church and am aware of some of the history pertaining to it, but wouldn't have guessed it would be used quite that way. It makes sense, I suppose.

    But no, there wasn't actually any Melkite discussion last thread. Mikel was talking about his surprisingly heated Mormon discussion with Dmity (I wouldn't have guessed a Russian and a Basque would be so heated over Mormon, but life is full of surprises!)

    But in a case of self-fulfilling prophecy it seems that Mikel has manifested a Melkite discussion into this thread!

    Replies: @Mikel

  26. Mythology explained in one comic [MORE]

    PEACE 😇

    [MORE]

    • LOL: Barbarossa
  27. This is a really good article pertaining to the car repair topic Thulean Friend and I were discussing last thread. It’s very much worth the read even if you think you don’t have any interest in car repair. It touches on some of the core issues of our increasingly complex technological world.

    https://www.wired.com/story/high-tech-cars-killing-the-traditional-auto-repair-shop/#intcid=_wired-right-rail_04d65f30-1c0e-410b-b6d8-87e67b8b68f9_popular4-1-reranked-by-vidi

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @Barbarossa

    It is an interesting article. Do you know whether or not electric cars, specifically Teslas, due to the paucity of moving engine parts are easier to maintain and avoid some of the pitfalls of more traditionally designed cars, or do they present their own set of complex problems? Car repair problems 101: Teslas vs porsches (I use posches because they are used as examples in the article you posted).

    Replies: @Philip Owen

  28. @Yevardian
    @Mikel

    Must have missed that. In private conversation Armenians often call westerners in general 'Melkites', though of course the word just means any Roman (Chalcedonian) Christian. Etymology comes from the Semitic root for 'king', i.e, the emperor.

    Replies: @Barbarossa

    In private conversation Armenians often call westerners in general ‘Melkites’,

    That is interesting. I actually attend a Melkite Church and am aware of some of the history pertaining to it, but wouldn’t have guessed it would be used quite that way. It makes sense, I suppose.

    But no, there wasn’t actually any Melkite discussion last thread. Mikel was talking about his surprisingly heated Mormon discussion with Dmity (I wouldn’t have guessed a Russian and a Basque would be so heated over Mormon, but life is full of surprises!)

    But in a case of self-fulfilling prophecy it seems that Mikel has manifested a Melkite discussion into this thread!

    • Replies: @Mikel
    @Barbarossa

    Sorry about that. If I had known, I would have chosen Maronites or Mennonites instead.

    But well, since we're at it, do you have unusual ritual or proselytizing practices that would look strange to sensitive Europeans?

    Replies: @Barbarossa

  29. @A123
    @Barbarossa

    Does anyone know about the Marmites? Are they from New Zealand?

    Apparently, they have mental hygiene criteria and operate the Sanitarium Health and Wellbeing Company.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @Barbarossa

    I’ve heard of the Aussie spread called Marmite but never of any group named that. It appears that the Sanitarium Health and Wellbeing Company is actually a Seventh Day Adventist project.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanitarium_Health_and_Wellbeing_Company

    I suppose that might be better than being a wholly owned Metallica Health and Wellbeing Company…

    • Thanks: A123
    • Replies: @A123
    @Barbarossa

    I was intending humor. While Kiwis are zealous about their Marmite, I do not believe they think of it as a religion.

    I noticed the "Sanatarium" branding at one point and thus the manufacturer name.

     
    https://static.countdown.co.nz/assets/product-images/zoom/94149494.jpg
     

    I was unaware that it was associate with the Seventh Day Adventist product.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @Philip Owen

  30. @Barbarossa
    @Yevardian


    In private conversation Armenians often call westerners in general ‘Melkites’,
     
    That is interesting. I actually attend a Melkite Church and am aware of some of the history pertaining to it, but wouldn't have guessed it would be used quite that way. It makes sense, I suppose.

    But no, there wasn't actually any Melkite discussion last thread. Mikel was talking about his surprisingly heated Mormon discussion with Dmity (I wouldn't have guessed a Russian and a Basque would be so heated over Mormon, but life is full of surprises!)

    But in a case of self-fulfilling prophecy it seems that Mikel has manifested a Melkite discussion into this thread!

    Replies: @Mikel

    Sorry about that. If I had known, I would have chosen Maronites or Mennonites instead.

    But well, since we’re at it, do you have unusual ritual or proselytizing practices that would look strange to sensitive Europeans?

    • Replies: @Barbarossa
    @Mikel

    Well, there is no anointing of genitals that I'm aware of, but I think that Emil Nikola Richard would have to agree that the hats are pretty decent...

    http://www.perthcatholic.org.au/d/Resource_Library/News_and_Events_Pictures/2019/August/Week_5/1GX7RU7LJ76KTCES8J770RAMY1WNJJ/ZGNGLO93QNLTN2E_FREEFORMSIZE_847_565.jpg/Melkite5Aug19_FREEFORMSIZE_847_565.jpg

    They do have married priests, which weirds out most Roman Catholics I talk to, so perhaps that constitutes the Melkite Church being a perverse sex cult after all!

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard

  31. @Mikel
    @Barbarossa

    Sorry about that. If I had known, I would have chosen Maronites or Mennonites instead.

    But well, since we're at it, do you have unusual ritual or proselytizing practices that would look strange to sensitive Europeans?

    Replies: @Barbarossa

    Well, there is no anointing of genitals that I’m aware of, but I think that Emil Nikola Richard would have to agree that the hats are pretty decent…

    They do have married priests, which weirds out most Roman Catholics I talk to, so perhaps that constitutes the Melkite Church being a perverse sex cult after all!

    • LOL: Mikel
    • Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Barbarossa

    I don't know if this is true but I have read on a religion trivia site that the thing about covering your head in church is sourced in a 2000 year old theory about human biology that the same base material produced sex fluid and hair and the belief was exposed hair was an incitement to horny demons to violate your person.

    We have lost a bunch of great data since the academic industry decided religion was all a bunch of superstitious nonsense and needed ignoring for the sake of proper useful knowledge.

  32. @Barbarossa
    @Mikel

    Well, there is no anointing of genitals that I'm aware of, but I think that Emil Nikola Richard would have to agree that the hats are pretty decent...

    http://www.perthcatholic.org.au/d/Resource_Library/News_and_Events_Pictures/2019/August/Week_5/1GX7RU7LJ76KTCES8J770RAMY1WNJJ/ZGNGLO93QNLTN2E_FREEFORMSIZE_847_565.jpg/Melkite5Aug19_FREEFORMSIZE_847_565.jpg

    They do have married priests, which weirds out most Roman Catholics I talk to, so perhaps that constitutes the Melkite Church being a perverse sex cult after all!

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard

    I don’t know if this is true but I have read on a religion trivia site that the thing about covering your head in church is sourced in a 2000 year old theory about human biology that the same base material produced sex fluid and hair and the belief was exposed hair was an incitement to horny demons to violate your person.

    We have lost a bunch of great data since the academic industry decided religion was all a bunch of superstitious nonsense and needed ignoring for the sake of proper useful knowledge.

  33. sher singh says:

    @bashi Yea I know it’s common knowledge that Jatts are Scythians & Rajputs/Gujjars are Huns.
    They straddle NW India though so many are Sikh/Muslim – they’ve faded from the mainstream.

    Hinduism today is culturally rooted in the Gangetic or Gujurati-Maratha region.
    There’s not even genetic overlap – Upper Caste or NW Indians are 3x closer to Avars.

    https://araingang.medium.com/south-asia-ancestry-map-637092c0728a

    • Replies: @Bashibuzuk
    @sher singh

    Excellent map.

    I would just replace "Ancient Iranian" by Elamite and/or BAMAC and it would be perfect.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard

  34. @Barbarossa
    This is a really good article pertaining to the car repair topic Thulean Friend and I were discussing last thread. It's very much worth the read even if you think you don't have any interest in car repair. It touches on some of the core issues of our increasingly complex technological world.

    https://www.wired.com/story/high-tech-cars-killing-the-traditional-auto-repair-shop/#intcid=_wired-right-rail_04d65f30-1c0e-410b-b6d8-87e67b8b68f9_popular4-1-reranked-by-vidi

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    It is an interesting article. Do you know whether or not electric cars, specifically Teslas, due to the paucity of moving engine parts are easier to maintain and avoid some of the pitfalls of more traditionally designed cars, or do they present their own set of complex problems? Car repair problems 101: Teslas vs porsches (I use posches because they are used as examples in the article you posted).

    • Replies: @Philip Owen
    @Mr. Hack

    I haven't seen details for 5 years on the practical maintenance of electric cars but there was an article in IEEE Spectrum around that time which suggested that maintenance was, on the young fleet at the time, dramatically less. The key item of wear is of course the battery. I haven't looked but it seems to me that there is an insurance opportunity to pay monthly against future battery replacement costs.

    The particular article was enthusiastic about the passing of private cars as the economic case favoured near continuous running over a long life for electrics. (Very little dependency on mileage other than battery). So self driving taxis were suggested as the best economic option for the future of automobiles.

    I am part of the murder team for the smallo autorepair shop as I enabled technology transfer from the European Space Agency of satellite signal and power bus technology into the Bordnetz standard later upgraded for electric vehicles and lithium ion battery management systems (which is why Airbus cockpits don't have battery fires, just like space craft).

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

  35. sher singh says:

    The Karlin discord is full of:

    1. Angry American White Nationalists who believe:
    • Being White = Automatically Vedic Upper Caste
    • Aryans Eat Beef
    • Circumcision is Trad
    • Everyone wants to be White
    • Non-White Gangs don’t control large parts of the USA (cities)

    2. Weirdos:
    • Half white Copt defending smelling his dad’s dick or measuring his mom/sisters labia
    • German-American (mixed) White Nationalist who thinks poking at poop in the toilet is cool.
    • Random SinoBoos who defend China at the drop of a hat, while being White Nationalists

    3. Random LatAms & Chinese:
    • They hate India for being a brown country with culture
    • Refuse to remain on topic, and try to suck up to the wignats
    • Asian trolls who hate Indians, but are turned on by Indian Man Chinese Woman couples

    To top it all off most of them value religion, but hate religiosity – calling it a larp, cope or w/e

    “I don’t let any dieties control my life”

    Truly a circus,

    • LOL: Yevardian, Barbarossa, Bashibuzuk
    • Replies: @Yevardian
    @sher singh

    I remember this "viper" saying that's just what to expect from the discord platform, not even a reflection on the "Kesslerisation appreciator" himself.

    Btw, I guess you heard of this, but I was rereading Herodotos a while back and noticed his description of Scythians worshipping swords. You're still a pajeet though, sir.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @sher singh

    , @Barbarossa
    @sher singh



    “I don’t let any dieties control my life”
     
    Hey, I don't let any dieties control my life either, I eat whatever I please!

    Replies: @sher singh

  36. @sher singh
    The Karlin discord is full of:

    1. Angry American White Nationalists who believe:
    • Being White = Automatically Vedic Upper Caste
    • Aryans Eat Beef
    • Circumcision is Trad
    • Everyone wants to be White
    • Non-White Gangs don’t control large parts of the USA (cities)

    2. Weirdos:
    • Half white Copt defending smelling his dad’s dick or measuring his mom/sisters labia
    • German-American (mixed) White Nationalist who thinks poking at poop in the toilet is cool.
    • Random SinoBoos who defend China at the drop of a hat, while being White Nationalists

    3. Random LatAms & Chinese:
    • They hate India for being a brown country with culture
    • Refuse to remain on topic, and try to suck up to the wignats
    • Asian trolls who hate Indians, but are turned on by Indian Man Chinese Woman couples

    To top it all off most of them value religion, but hate religiosity – calling it a larp, cope or w/e

    "I don't let any dieties control my life"

    Truly a circus,

    Replies: @Yevardian, @Barbarossa

    I remember this “viper” saying that’s just what to expect from the discord platform, not even a reflection on the “Kesslerisation appreciator” himself.

    Btw, I guess you heard of this, but I was rereading Herodotos a while back and noticed his description of Scythians worshipping swords. You’re still a pajeet though, sir.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @Yevardian

    Ukies worship antitank guns and proffer sainthood upon them. I suspect there will be sects who bow before Drones.

    Replies: @LatW, @Mikhail

    , @sher singh
    @Yevardian

    Water under the bridge, Rajputs are Huns.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alchon_Huns

    You're not Greek or Iranian & like Germans will cease to exist in a century.
    Wokechoke ignores that Weapons are worshipped in general - not as idols.

    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ

    Replies: @Yevardian

  37. @Beckow
    @Coconuts

    In retrospect it looks like the ancestral German ethic was mostly aspirational. The much deeper, habitual, institutional culture was not changed. It takes much longer than even 2-3 generations. There is a stickiness to the Middle-East-Hellenes-Rome derived culture that many have underestimated.

    Actually by far the most successful has been the American onslaught that uses primarily comfort and ease. The aspirational stuff has to imposed either by force or with discipline - it is a tough sell. Take two 5-year olds and offer candy vs. almost anything else, the overwhelming choice is the more pleasant, easier one. People crave it.

    The problem is that once you start descend down the staircase to the lazy, low-bar, comfortable survival there is no way back. A few more steps...and nobody is climbing back up.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Wokechoke

    America is in many ways the dream of the peasant labouring in the middle ages before the modern age. A house warm, a car that moves, a TV glowing, a fridge full etc.

  38. @Yevardian
    @sher singh

    I remember this "viper" saying that's just what to expect from the discord platform, not even a reflection on the "Kesslerisation appreciator" himself.

    Btw, I guess you heard of this, but I was rereading Herodotos a while back and noticed his description of Scythians worshipping swords. You're still a pajeet though, sir.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @sher singh

    Ukies worship antitank guns and proffer sainthood upon them. I suspect there will be sects who bow before Drones.

    • Replies: @LatW
    @Wokechoke


    I suspect there will be sects who bow before Drones.
     
    Some pets are named Bayraktar. Not kids yet, hopefully. Pretty cool to have a little French bulldog named Bayraktar. :)
    , @Mikhail
    @Wokechoke

    https://twitter.com/RWApodcast/status/1583812274481135617

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Yevardian

  39. The Visegrad crew now advocating Islamic terrorism. I’m noticing a drop in sympathy from Western Europeans who communicate online in English and French for these supposedly based Central/Eastern European countries like Poland. Germans with any self-respect – assuming there are some left – must be looking at the reaction to Nord Stream from Poland & the Baltics along with the WW2 grifting and drawing conclusions about their ‘allies’. Hungary is still fine but no reason left to care anymore about Poles and Baltoids. They have too much undigested history, too big a chip on their shoulders, and too selfish & pig-headed in general.

    In other news nearly 630k Ukrainians have applied for temporary resident status – in Canada whether students or special circumstances like this war there is almost no such thing as temporary status, permanent status will follow. Over 312k have already been accepted. Given Canada’s family unification policies and lack of clarity regarding how many of these applications do not include dependent relatives & soldiers left behind its possible that something like 2-3%, maybe more if the war drags on, of Ukraine’s entire pre-war population could end up in Canada. A lot of these will be young people. Even with a Ukrainian victory, however that is defined, the future of Ukraine doesn’t look good.

    • Replies: @German_reader
    @Matra


    Hungary is still fine
     
    Here's a transcript of a recent Orban interview by German magazine Cicero:
    https://miniszterelnok.hu/panel-discussion-involving-prime-minister-viktor-orban-and-the-directors-of-the-monthly-magazine-cicero/
    Of course Orban isn't perfect either (most notably regarding corruption and nepotism), but compared to the horror show from Poland and the Baltic states whose politicians seem keen on a world war against Sino-Russian-Iranian alliance he's a model of sanity and responsibility.

    Replies: @sudden death

    , @Wokechoke
    @Matra

    Surviving total war in Kherson Region, Ukraine in 1941 - 1945. Vladyslav Alexander


    How Kherson went from 100,000 souls to 100 residents between 1941 and 1945.


    It's happened before.

    , @AP
    @Matra


    I’m noticing a drop in sympathy from Western Europeans who communicate online in English and French for these supposedly based Central/Eastern European countries like Poland.
     
    A combination of the phenomenon of useful-for-Russia idiots who see a savior in Putin and therefore hatred for his enemies, and resentment of peoples who are superior to them and highlight their own faults. Peoples who actually fight for their homelands rather than invite in invaders who displace them, peoples who demand money rather than give it to those who replace them in their own lands, peoples who retain a high level of physical beauty that has been fading among the Westerners, etc.

    In other news nearly 630k Ukrainians have applied for temporary resident status – in Canada
     
    I'd guess most of the ones in Germany and Poland will return (my own have come back in summer to central Ukraine from the Rhineland where they went in March when Russians were threatening Kiev and Zhytomir) but most of the ones in North America will stay: it is further away and more difficult to come back. Though by no means will they all stay, many husbands and brothers have remained in Ukraine so there is a reason to return.

    Be careful, it will take longer for Canada to become an Indian-Chinese homeland (Singapore North) where Anglo servants kowtow before their new Chinese and Hindu elites, with all of those young Eastern Europeans refugees boosting the European population.

    Replies: @sher singh, @Dmitry

    , @S
    @Matra

    More destruction of identity, ie Russian, Ukrainian, Canadian, and various European states, for now, along with (just getting started) depopulation...just as the behind the scenes instigators of this developing world war have wanted from the start.

    The other two world wars had not dissimilar objectives in regards to identity destruction.

  40. German_reader says:
    @Matra
    The Visegrad crew now advocating Islamic terrorism. I'm noticing a drop in sympathy from Western Europeans who communicate online in English and French for these supposedly based Central/Eastern European countries like Poland. Germans with any self-respect - assuming there are some left - must be looking at the reaction to Nord Stream from Poland & the Baltics along with the WW2 grifting and drawing conclusions about their 'allies'. Hungary is still fine but no reason left to care anymore about Poles and Baltoids. They have too much undigested history, too big a chip on their shoulders, and too selfish & pig-headed in general.

    In other news nearly 630k Ukrainians have applied for temporary resident status - in Canada whether students or special circumstances like this war there is almost no such thing as temporary status, permanent status will follow. Over 312k have already been accepted. Given Canada's family unification policies and lack of clarity regarding how many of these applications do not include dependent relatives & soldiers left behind its possible that something like 2-3%, maybe more if the war drags on, of Ukraine's entire pre-war population could end up in Canada. A lot of these will be young people. Even with a Ukrainian victory, however that is defined, the future of Ukraine doesn't look good.

    Replies: @German_reader, @Wokechoke, @AP, @S

    Hungary is still fine

    Here’s a transcript of a recent Orban interview by German magazine Cicero:
    https://miniszterelnok.hu/panel-discussion-involving-prime-minister-viktor-orban-and-the-directors-of-the-monthly-magazine-cicero/
    Of course Orban isn’t perfect either (most notably regarding corruption and nepotism), but compared to the horror show from Poland and the Baltic states whose politicians seem keen on a world war against Sino-Russian-Iranian alliance he’s a model of sanity and responsibility.

    • Replies: @sudden death
    @German_reader

    Pure bliss from Orban, must be afraid now that various matras might excommunicate him too, lol


    I called it aggression on day one, and we accepted the European interpretation. Our thinking about the war is the same as the European Union’s position, of which we’re a part. So there’s no Hungarian position which is distinct from the European position: we share the European Union’s position. This is aggression. Moreover, I’m a lawyer, I was once – or, to be more precise, I went to law school. Legally, the situation is absolutely clear. There is international law, and the Russians have violated it. This is called aggression. They’ve started a war. Whatever the reason, it’s an international violation, and there’s nothing more to talk about. It’s aggression.
     

    Replies: @German_reader

  41. @sher singh
    @bashi Yea I know it's common knowledge that Jatts are Scythians & Rajputs/Gujjars are Huns.
    They straddle NW India though so many are Sikh/Muslim - they've faded from the mainstream.

    Hinduism today is culturally rooted in the Gangetic or Gujurati-Maratha region.
    There's not even genetic overlap - Upper Caste or NW Indians are 3x closer to Avars.

    https://araingang.medium.com/south-asia-ancestry-map-637092c0728a

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

    Excellent map.

    I would just replace “Ancient Iranian” by Elamite and/or BAMAC and it would be perfect.

    • Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Bashibuzuk

    Have you read David Reich Who We Are and How We Got Here?

    Julius Evola Doctrine of Awakening?

    Do you know better sources on these topics?

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

  42. Quite interesting how Americans seem to be promoting the idea that the Chinese are “lying flat”, while the Chinese seem to be promoting the idea that Americans are “quiet quitters.”

    What if they are both right, and it is a sign of the upcoming severe decline in civilization?

    • Agree: Bashibuzuk
    • Replies: @Bashibuzuk
    @songbird

    I have a feeling that a lot of people around the World act kind of passive and are unsure of what lies ahead. The passionate ones are seen as somewhat disturbing, even dangerous and are applauded when they exterminate each other somewhere far, preferably in Syrak or Ukraine.

    But once the passionate and energetic dead, and the developed world population old and largely childless, who's gonna ensure "the progress" (sorry to use this completely discredited word) going forward or even current level of knowledge and culture remain sustained?

    The eclipse is nearly certain. Black Sun rises, our offspring will probably live in dark and dangerous times. But it will also be a time of opportunity for those who are not afraid of the Darkness. They will prevail.

    , @A123
    @songbird


    Quite interesting how Americans seem to be promoting the idea that the Chinese are “lying flat”, while the Chinese seem to be promoting the idea that Americans are “quiet quitters.”

    What if they are both right, and it is a sign of the upcoming severe decline in civilization?
     
    It is a reflection of dysfunction, not the cause.

    In America, rewards are assigned based on DEI credentialing. If hard work offers no hope of gain... Why do it?

    The problem is fixable, as Christian Populism still contains the necessary concepts. However, it will take time.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @songbird

  43. Bashibuzuk says:
    @songbird
    Quite interesting how Americans seem to be promoting the idea that the Chinese are "lying flat", while the Chinese seem to be promoting the idea that Americans are "quiet quitters."

    What if they are both right, and it is a sign of the upcoming severe decline in civilization?

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk, @A123

    I have a feeling that a lot of people around the World act kind of passive and are unsure of what lies ahead. The passionate ones are seen as somewhat disturbing, even dangerous and are applauded when they exterminate each other somewhere far, preferably in Syrak or Ukraine.

    But once the passionate and energetic dead, and the developed world population old and largely childless, who’s gonna ensure “the progress” (sorry to use this completely discredited word) going forward or even current level of knowledge and culture remain sustained?

    The eclipse is nearly certain. Black Sun rises, our offspring will probably live in dark and dangerous times. But it will also be a time of opportunity for those who are not afraid of the Darkness. They will prevail.

  44. @Barbarossa
    @A123

    I've heard of the Aussie spread called Marmite but never of any group named that. It appears that the Sanitarium Health and Wellbeing Company is actually a Seventh Day Adventist project.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanitarium_Health_and_Wellbeing_Company

    I suppose that might be better than being a wholly owned Metallica Health and Wellbeing Company...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V6Dfo4zDduI

    Replies: @A123

    I was intending humor. While Kiwis are zealous about their Marmite, I do not believe they think of it as a religion.

    I noticed the “Sanatarium” branding at one point and thus the manufacturer name.

     

     

    I was unaware that it was associate with the Seventh Day Adventist product.

    PEACE 😇

    • Replies: @Philip Owen
    @A123

    Marmite, when not the original beef stew in Bavaria, is a British yeast based spread. It has a bitter taste that some people cannot endure. There is an Australian rival called Vegemite. There is also Bovril in the UK. This is a similar product based on beef extract (I don't know either).

    I have tried Marmite on Russian friends and they say there is something similar in Russia but I have never seen it on sale.

  45. @songbird
    Quite interesting how Americans seem to be promoting the idea that the Chinese are "lying flat", while the Chinese seem to be promoting the idea that Americans are "quiet quitters."

    What if they are both right, and it is a sign of the upcoming severe decline in civilization?

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk, @A123

    Quite interesting how Americans seem to be promoting the idea that the Chinese are “lying flat”, while the Chinese seem to be promoting the idea that Americans are “quiet quitters.”

    What if they are both right, and it is a sign of the upcoming severe decline in civilization?

    It is a reflection of dysfunction, not the cause.

    In America, rewards are assigned based on DEI credentialing. If hard work offers no hope of gain… Why do it?

    The problem is fixable, as Christian Populism still contains the necessary concepts. However, it will take time.

    PEACE 😇

    • Replies: @songbird
    @A123

    I think that, in order for the US to stand any chance at fixing its problems, it would need to close its borders, for at least ten years. Complete moratorium, and from the rhetoric I hear, I don't see how its possible. Hard to halt, when the founding mythos has been deconstructed, and the founding stock villified.

    One of the problems with open borders, IMO, is that it dominates the political rhetoric, so that the national looking glass is shattered, and there can't be any introspection.

    I view DIE as a very severe problem, but to a certain extent it is combinational. We would still be suffering from the some of the same problems that East Asians have, even without DIE.

    Part of it is generational. Hierarchies form. The old dominate and protect their positions. The rising cost of housing and credentialism is seen as a boon by them, in many cases. They get carve outs because of their seniority while the young pay the cost of DIE the most, and don't get hired or promoted.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @A123

  46. @Bashibuzuk
    @sher singh

    Excellent map.

    I would just replace "Ancient Iranian" by Elamite and/or BAMAC and it would be perfect.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard

    Have you read David Reich Who We Are and How We Got Here?

    Julius Evola Doctrine of Awakening?

    Do you know better sources on these topics?

    • Replies: @Bashibuzuk
    @Emil Nikola Richard

    I haven't read any of these books. I have read Evola's Men among the ruins, Ride the tiger, and tried to read his book about Tantra but has been turned off by his insistence on the sexual angle.

    I think that the best texts on Awakening are the scriptures of the Vijnanavada/Yogacara/Cittamatra school. IMHO they have gone the further in their study of consciousness and its relationship to both phenomenology and epistemology.

    https://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/5793770

    I see this school of thought as more aligned with my psychology than Madhyamaka.

    https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/madhyamaka/

    I am of course biased towards a more "idealistic" outlook on Reality. Altan Bakshi (whose conversation I miss a lot) would certainly not agree with my preference towards Yogacara. He was a Tibetan Buddhist after all, while my main refuge is Ch'an/Zen.

    However, one of the most interesting takes on the teleology driving the whole evolution of cognitive capabilities has been discussed by a famous Orthodox Christian American of Slavic descent.

    https://www.sikorskyarchives.com/Evolution.php

    This lecture is of course quite compatible with the vision of the Jesuit anthropologist Theillard de Chardin.

    It is also compatible with Russian Cosmism of which Sikorsky might have been aware given both his origins and his professional field.

    Of course, all these lines of thought are influenced by the Orthodox Christian teaching about Theosis (a tip of hat to Mr Hack who holds this teaching in highest esteem). It is just that they transfered this teaching from its afterlife focus to the material world and its evolution towards becoming sentient.

    An interesting detail, the first prototype built by Sikorsky was co-financed by another famous Orthodox Christian Russian-born American of distant Tatar ancestry - Rakhmaninov.

    Regarding population genetics, it is a heavily censured and a very politically correct scientific domain. There are controversial topics that they will probably never discuss. And whole genome comparisons are often misleading because the whole of the genome is seen as uniform in its propensity to mutation and genetic drift (you might perhaps be interested in the article about the genetics of paleo-americans that I have posted above, the authors are clearly up to something). I prefer looking only on Y chromosome haplogroups, these are the best markers to follow ethnic groups.

    About the origins of the Balto-Slav, Indo-European and Indo-Iranian populations, I think the best books on genetics are those by Klyosov. But one should be aware of his pro-Russian/Slav bias. Also, Where did the Indo-Aryans come from? : the material culture of the tribes of the Andronovo community and the origin of the Indo-Iranians. by Kuz'mina is an excellent work of anthropology. She has also collaborated with Mallory and published in English, but I did not read it.

    https://brill.com/view/book/edcoll/9789047420712/Bej.9789004160545.i-763_001.xml?language=en

    Basically, digging into publications on human paleogenetics, comparing the finds to historical sources and linguistics help get an idea of what might have happened. It is a hobby of mine that I have spent a lot of time (probably too much time) pursuing.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard

  47. @German_reader
    @Matra


    Hungary is still fine
     
    Here's a transcript of a recent Orban interview by German magazine Cicero:
    https://miniszterelnok.hu/panel-discussion-involving-prime-minister-viktor-orban-and-the-directors-of-the-monthly-magazine-cicero/
    Of course Orban isn't perfect either (most notably regarding corruption and nepotism), but compared to the horror show from Poland and the Baltic states whose politicians seem keen on a world war against Sino-Russian-Iranian alliance he's a model of sanity and responsibility.

    Replies: @sudden death

    Pure bliss from Orban, must be afraid now that various matras might excommunicate him too, lol

    I called it aggression on day one, and we accepted the European interpretation. Our thinking about the war is the same as the European Union’s position, of which we’re a part. So there’s no Hungarian position which is distinct from the European position: we share the European Union’s position. This is aggression. Moreover, I’m a lawyer, I was once – or, to be more precise, I went to law school. Legally, the situation is absolutely clear. There is international law, and the Russians have violated it. This is called aggression. They’ve started a war. Whatever the reason, it’s an international violation, and there’s nothing more to talk about. It’s aggression.

    • Replies: @German_reader
    @sudden death

    The question is how to deal with that aggression. Balts, who must be some of the most myopic and emotionally incontinent peoples at least in the northern hemisphere, regularly come up with brilliant proposals like this (from a former high-ranking Estonian general):

    https://twitter.com/RihoTerras/status/1582039802018680832?cxt=HHwWgMDSvay0xPQrAAAA

    Not content with agitating for war with Russia, Baltic politicians like the stupid bitch running Estonia are now criticizing Scholz' upcoming trip to China, clamouring that there needs to be a common European position...which just means adopting the position of the most hardline American crusaders and their framework of a Manichaean zero sum struggle between "democracies" and "autocracies". I don't know what sort of supermen Balts imagine themselves to be, they seem awfully keen on taking not just on Russia, but on an entire Sino-Russian-Iranian bloc, that has mostly just come into being because of American policies.

    Replies: @Matra

  48. @Matra
    The Visegrad crew now advocating Islamic terrorism. I'm noticing a drop in sympathy from Western Europeans who communicate online in English and French for these supposedly based Central/Eastern European countries like Poland. Germans with any self-respect - assuming there are some left - must be looking at the reaction to Nord Stream from Poland & the Baltics along with the WW2 grifting and drawing conclusions about their 'allies'. Hungary is still fine but no reason left to care anymore about Poles and Baltoids. They have too much undigested history, too big a chip on their shoulders, and too selfish & pig-headed in general.

    In other news nearly 630k Ukrainians have applied for temporary resident status - in Canada whether students or special circumstances like this war there is almost no such thing as temporary status, permanent status will follow. Over 312k have already been accepted. Given Canada's family unification policies and lack of clarity regarding how many of these applications do not include dependent relatives & soldiers left behind its possible that something like 2-3%, maybe more if the war drags on, of Ukraine's entire pre-war population could end up in Canada. A lot of these will be young people. Even with a Ukrainian victory, however that is defined, the future of Ukraine doesn't look good.

    Replies: @German_reader, @Wokechoke, @AP, @S

    Surviving total war in Kherson Region, Ukraine in 1941 – 1945. Vladyslav Alexander

    How Kherson went from 100,000 souls to 100 residents between 1941 and 1945.

    It’s happened before.

    • Agree: Bashibuzuk
  49. @A123
    @songbird


    Quite interesting how Americans seem to be promoting the idea that the Chinese are “lying flat”, while the Chinese seem to be promoting the idea that Americans are “quiet quitters.”

    What if they are both right, and it is a sign of the upcoming severe decline in civilization?
     
    It is a reflection of dysfunction, not the cause.

    In America, rewards are assigned based on DEI credentialing. If hard work offers no hope of gain... Why do it?

    The problem is fixable, as Christian Populism still contains the necessary concepts. However, it will take time.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @songbird

    I think that, in order for the US to stand any chance at fixing its problems, it would need to close its borders, for at least ten years.

    [MORE]
    Complete moratorium, and from the rhetoric I hear, I don’t see how its possible. Hard to halt, when the founding mythos has been deconstructed, and the founding stock villified.

    One of the problems with open borders, IMO, is that it dominates the political rhetoric, so that the national looking glass is shattered, and there can’t be any introspection.

    I view DIE as a very severe problem, but to a certain extent it is combinational. We would still be suffering from the some of the same problems that East Asians have, even without DIE.

    Part of it is generational. Hierarchies form. The old dominate and protect their positions. The rising cost of housing and credentialism is seen as a boon by them, in many cases. They get carve outs because of their seniority while the young pay the cost of DIE the most, and don’t get hired or promoted.

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @songbird


    the young pay the cost of DIE the most, and don’t get hired or promoted.
     
    Did you mean :the young pay the cost and DIE the most, and don't get hired or promoted
     Still plenty of "help wanted" signs in my neck of the woods. McDonalds and Burger King start at no les than $15 an hour. That means that a young couple could make possibly $62,400/year. No reason to go off of the deep end and end it all by overdosing on opioids...

    https://www.syracuse.com/resizer/tlZI9-qS6Nvxt6F6U6Elqo7h1AQ=/800x0/smart/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/advancelocal/C7VQMZZCWJGIVIC4AQ6BTUIMCI.jpg

    Replies: @German_reader, @songbird

    , @A123
    @songbird


    I think that, in order for the US to stand any chance at fixing its problems, it would need to close its borders, for at least ten years.

    Complete moratorium, and from the rhetoric I hear, I don’t see how its possible. Hard to halt, when the founding mythos has been deconstructed, and the founding stock villified.
     
    A great deal can be achieved without "complete". A couple of examples:

    Asylum claims allowed only if the U.S. is "First Safe Country". Mexico is "Safe", so that would eliminate the vast majority of So the & Central American asylum seekers right there.

    The idea of citizenship by "drop location" is clearly not in the 14th Amendment. SCOTUS could easily support simple logic the the children of unknowns, tourist visas, and illegals are citizens of their home country (not America).

    PEACE 😇
  50. German_reader says:
    @sudden death
    @German_reader

    Pure bliss from Orban, must be afraid now that various matras might excommunicate him too, lol


    I called it aggression on day one, and we accepted the European interpretation. Our thinking about the war is the same as the European Union’s position, of which we’re a part. So there’s no Hungarian position which is distinct from the European position: we share the European Union’s position. This is aggression. Moreover, I’m a lawyer, I was once – or, to be more precise, I went to law school. Legally, the situation is absolutely clear. There is international law, and the Russians have violated it. This is called aggression. They’ve started a war. Whatever the reason, it’s an international violation, and there’s nothing more to talk about. It’s aggression.
     

    Replies: @German_reader

    The question is how to deal with that aggression. Balts, who must be some of the most myopic and emotionally incontinent peoples at least in the northern hemisphere, regularly come up with brilliant proposals like this (from a former high-ranking Estonian general):

    [MORE]

    Not content with agitating for war with Russia, Baltic politicians like the stupid bitch running Estonia are now criticizing Scholz’ upcoming trip to China, clamouring that there needs to be a common European position…which just means adopting the position of the most hardline American crusaders and their framework of a Manichaean zero sum struggle between “democracies” and “autocracies”. I don’t know what sort of supermen Balts imagine themselves to be, they seem awfully keen on taking not just on Russia, but on an entire Sino-Russian-Iranian bloc, that has mostly just come into being because of American policies.

    • Replies: @Matra
    @German_reader

    I can't recall the details but the former Estonian President, who is one of the most obnoxious former leaders on earth, recently suggested that once the war is over Ukraine should consider ditching Cyrillic script for Latin. He cited Ataturk getting rid of Arabic script as an example to follow. I know most Ukrainians embrace a Western identity these days but I'd be surprised if Ukrainian language speakers were willing to go that far but who knows. Maybe AP would have insight on such a possibility.

    Replies: @German_reader, @AP, @LatW

  51. Bashibuzuk says:
    @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Bashibuzuk

    Have you read David Reich Who We Are and How We Got Here?

    Julius Evola Doctrine of Awakening?

    Do you know better sources on these topics?

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

    I haven’t read any of these books. I have read Evola’s Men among the ruins, Ride the tiger, and tried to read his book about Tantra but has been turned off by his insistence on the sexual angle.

    I think that the best texts on Awakening are the scriptures of the Vijnanavada/Yogacara/Cittamatra school. IMHO they have gone the further in their study of consciousness and its relationship to both phenomenology and epistemology.

    https://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/5793770

    I see this school of thought as more aligned with my psychology than Madhyamaka.

    https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/madhyamaka/

    I am of course biased towards a more “idealistic” outlook on Reality. Altan Bakshi (whose conversation I miss a lot) would certainly not agree with my preference towards Yogacara. He was a Tibetan Buddhist after all, while my main refuge is Ch’an/Zen.

    [MORE]

    However, one of the most interesting takes on the teleology driving the whole evolution of cognitive capabilities has been discussed by a famous Orthodox Christian American of Slavic descent.

    https://www.sikorskyarchives.com/Evolution.php

    This lecture is of course quite compatible with the vision of the Jesuit anthropologist Theillard de Chardin.

    It is also compatible with Russian Cosmism of which Sikorsky might have been aware given both his origins and his professional field.

    Of course, all these lines of thought are influenced by the Orthodox Christian teaching about Theosis (a tip of hat to Mr Hack who holds this teaching in highest esteem). It is just that they transfered this teaching from its afterlife focus to the material world and its evolution towards becoming sentient.

    An interesting detail, the first prototype built by Sikorsky was co-financed by another famous Orthodox Christian Russian-born American of distant Tatar ancestry – Rakhmaninov.

    Regarding population genetics, it is a heavily censured and a very politically correct scientific domain. There are controversial topics that they will probably never discuss. And whole genome comparisons are often misleading because the whole of the genome is seen as uniform in its propensity to mutation and genetic drift (you might perhaps be interested in the article about the genetics of paleo-americans that I have posted above, the authors are clearly up to something). I prefer looking only on Y chromosome haplogroups, these are the best markers to follow ethnic groups.

    About the origins of the Balto-Slav, Indo-European and Indo-Iranian populations, I think the best books on genetics are those by Klyosov. But one should be aware of his pro-Russian/Slav bias. Also, Where did the Indo-Aryans come from? : the material culture of the tribes of the Andronovo community and the origin of the Indo-Iranians. by Kuz’mina is an excellent work of anthropology. She has also collaborated with Mallory and published in English, but I did not read it.

    https://brill.com/view/book/edcoll/9789047420712/Bej.9789004160545.i-763_001.xml?language=en

    Basically, digging into publications on human paleogenetics, comparing the finds to historical sources and linguistics help get an idea of what might have happened. It is a hobby of mine that I have spent a lot of time (probably too much time) pursuing.

    • Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Bashibuzuk

    Thank you.

    I will look at your recommended sources I have not seen before, although it will definitely take more than a day!

    In the meantime, have a look at Alan Moore's deity:

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/de/Glycon_%2851644816839%29.jpg/678px-Glycon_%2851644816839%29.jpg

    The Brill publication which retails for 330 dollars is 42 minutes of downloading time from libgen away!

    Is this a sin?

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk, @S

  52. @A123
    If we are opening with videos. This explains, in a humorous way, why major studio films are struggling.

    Warning: NSFW Language

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ngqO9Hp19_4

    Sorry if this is a dupe. I do not always remember what has been previously shared.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @Supply and Demand, @Wokechoke

    That’s Lenny Henry.

    A Black Numinorian?

    still not funny, Lenny.

  53. @songbird
    @A123

    I think that, in order for the US to stand any chance at fixing its problems, it would need to close its borders, for at least ten years. Complete moratorium, and from the rhetoric I hear, I don't see how its possible. Hard to halt, when the founding mythos has been deconstructed, and the founding stock villified.

    One of the problems with open borders, IMO, is that it dominates the political rhetoric, so that the national looking glass is shattered, and there can't be any introspection.

    I view DIE as a very severe problem, but to a certain extent it is combinational. We would still be suffering from the some of the same problems that East Asians have, even without DIE.

    Part of it is generational. Hierarchies form. The old dominate and protect their positions. The rising cost of housing and credentialism is seen as a boon by them, in many cases. They get carve outs because of their seniority while the young pay the cost of DIE the most, and don't get hired or promoted.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @A123

    the young pay the cost of DIE the most, and don’t get hired or promoted.

    Did you mean :the young pay the cost and DIE the most, and don’t get hired or promoted

    Still plenty of “help wanted” signs in my neck of the woods. McDonalds and Burger King start at no les than $15 an hour. That means that a young couple could make possibly $62,400/year. No reason to go off of the deep end and end it all by overdosing on opioids…

    • Replies: @German_reader
    @Mr. Hack

    Is your pro-Ukrainian activism not enough, do you also have to be the worst kind of self-satisfied boomer? Seriously, going on about "careers" in fast food restaurants while completely ignoring songbird's point about the escalating diversity regime, that's really a bit much.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Wokechoke

    , @songbird
    @Mr. Hack

    Haha. Very amusing - you sound like a Sackler exec.

    BTW, which national TV network's evening news broadcast do you tune into daily at 6:30 PM (or Mountain Time equivalent?)

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

  54. @Bashibuzuk
    @Emil Nikola Richard

    I haven't read any of these books. I have read Evola's Men among the ruins, Ride the tiger, and tried to read his book about Tantra but has been turned off by his insistence on the sexual angle.

    I think that the best texts on Awakening are the scriptures of the Vijnanavada/Yogacara/Cittamatra school. IMHO they have gone the further in their study of consciousness and its relationship to both phenomenology and epistemology.

    https://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/5793770

    I see this school of thought as more aligned with my psychology than Madhyamaka.

    https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/madhyamaka/

    I am of course biased towards a more "idealistic" outlook on Reality. Altan Bakshi (whose conversation I miss a lot) would certainly not agree with my preference towards Yogacara. He was a Tibetan Buddhist after all, while my main refuge is Ch'an/Zen.

    However, one of the most interesting takes on the teleology driving the whole evolution of cognitive capabilities has been discussed by a famous Orthodox Christian American of Slavic descent.

    https://www.sikorskyarchives.com/Evolution.php

    This lecture is of course quite compatible with the vision of the Jesuit anthropologist Theillard de Chardin.

    It is also compatible with Russian Cosmism of which Sikorsky might have been aware given both his origins and his professional field.

    Of course, all these lines of thought are influenced by the Orthodox Christian teaching about Theosis (a tip of hat to Mr Hack who holds this teaching in highest esteem). It is just that they transfered this teaching from its afterlife focus to the material world and its evolution towards becoming sentient.

    An interesting detail, the first prototype built by Sikorsky was co-financed by another famous Orthodox Christian Russian-born American of distant Tatar ancestry - Rakhmaninov.

    Regarding population genetics, it is a heavily censured and a very politically correct scientific domain. There are controversial topics that they will probably never discuss. And whole genome comparisons are often misleading because the whole of the genome is seen as uniform in its propensity to mutation and genetic drift (you might perhaps be interested in the article about the genetics of paleo-americans that I have posted above, the authors are clearly up to something). I prefer looking only on Y chromosome haplogroups, these are the best markers to follow ethnic groups.

    About the origins of the Balto-Slav, Indo-European and Indo-Iranian populations, I think the best books on genetics are those by Klyosov. But one should be aware of his pro-Russian/Slav bias. Also, Where did the Indo-Aryans come from? : the material culture of the tribes of the Andronovo community and the origin of the Indo-Iranians. by Kuz'mina is an excellent work of anthropology. She has also collaborated with Mallory and published in English, but I did not read it.

    https://brill.com/view/book/edcoll/9789047420712/Bej.9789004160545.i-763_001.xml?language=en

    Basically, digging into publications on human paleogenetics, comparing the finds to historical sources and linguistics help get an idea of what might have happened. It is a hobby of mine that I have spent a lot of time (probably too much time) pursuing.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard

    Thank you.

    I will look at your recommended sources I have not seen before, although it will definitely take more than a day!

    In the meantime, have a look at Alan Moore’s deity:

    The Brill publication which retails for 330 dollars is 42 minutes of downloading time from libgen away!

    Is this a sin?

    • LOL: Bashibuzuk
    • Replies: @Bashibuzuk
    @Emil Nikola Richard

    Logos must be freed from the Demiurge's entrapment. Information must flow free. Long live Libgen that helps our consciousness evolve towards the Omega Point!

    😁

    Beautiful statue, they got Him represented right.

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d2/Lion-faced_deity.jpg/150px-Lion-faced_deity.jpg

    Each time I see His representations in their myriad forms, I feel both gratitude and rancor. I'm probably just being picky and spoiled. Without Him, where would we all be ? Would we be at all ?



    It occurred to me that my questions have been asked before me, and by men of much higher spiritual achievements:


    One day John, the brother of James [these are the sons of Zebedee], was going up to the Temple. A Pharisee by the name of Arimanios came up to him and challenged him, asking: "Where is the teacher you used to follow?"

    John replied, "He has gone back to the place from which he came."

    The Pharisee said, "That Nazarene misled you (plural), told you lies, closed your hearts and turned you away from your ancestral traditions.”

    When I heard these things, I, John, turned away from the temple and went off to a deserted mountainous place. I was very unhappy, saying to myself:

    "How was the Savior designated?
    Why did his Father send him into the world?
    Who is his Father?
    What kind of realm will we go to?

    For, although he told us, ‘This realm is modeled on the imperishable realm,’
    He didn't teach us about the latter.”
     
    http://www.gnosis.org/naghamm/apocjn-davies.html

    I am pretty sure the Blind Watchmaker would agree with my choice of scriptural references.

    You have a great weekend!

    🙂
    , @S
    @Emil Nikola Richard

    Reminds me of the Thulsa Doom character in Conan the Barbarian.

    Anyhow, the self proclaimed 'progressive' types can't help themselves with the race mixing thing.

    Like that Ice Age Columbus clip I recently posted which featured the primordial European Solutrean chief who was obviously half Cree (and half Scot), European peoples are not supposed to have anything to themselves.

    Truth is a dangerous thing to the powers that be.


    https://www.grayflannelsuit.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2005/08/Conan-The-Barbarian-Thulsa-Doom-james-earl-jones-snake.jpg

  55. @Mr. Hack
    @songbird


    the young pay the cost of DIE the most, and don’t get hired or promoted.
     
    Did you mean :the young pay the cost and DIE the most, and don't get hired or promoted
     Still plenty of "help wanted" signs in my neck of the woods. McDonalds and Burger King start at no les than $15 an hour. That means that a young couple could make possibly $62,400/year. No reason to go off of the deep end and end it all by overdosing on opioids...

    https://www.syracuse.com/resizer/tlZI9-qS6Nvxt6F6U6Elqo7h1AQ=/800x0/smart/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/advancelocal/C7VQMZZCWJGIVIC4AQ6BTUIMCI.jpg

    Replies: @German_reader, @songbird

    Is your pro-Ukrainian activism not enough, do you also have to be the worst kind of self-satisfied boomer? Seriously, going on about “careers” in fast food restaurants while completely ignoring songbird’s point about the escalating diversity regime, that’s really a bit much.

    • Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
    @German_reader

    The economy in my neck of the woods (>1000 mi from Phoenix) also is booming. If the end of the world is on the way it certainly has a deceptive prelude.

    Ted Kaczynski says the technological singularity has already happened.

    Replies: @A123

    , @Wokechoke
    @German_reader

    Who say's Hack isn't a you know what...

  56. Bashibuzuk says:
    @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Bashibuzuk

    Thank you.

    I will look at your recommended sources I have not seen before, although it will definitely take more than a day!

    In the meantime, have a look at Alan Moore's deity:

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/de/Glycon_%2851644816839%29.jpg/678px-Glycon_%2851644816839%29.jpg

    The Brill publication which retails for 330 dollars is 42 minutes of downloading time from libgen away!

    Is this a sin?

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk, @S

    Logos must be freed from the Demiurge’s entrapment. Information must flow free. Long live Libgen that helps our consciousness evolve towards the Omega Point!

    😁

    Beautiful statue, they got Him represented right.

    Each time I see His representations in their myriad forms, I feel both gratitude and rancor. I’m probably just being picky and spoiled. Without Him, where would we all be ? Would we be at all ?

    [MORE]

    It occurred to me that my questions have been asked before me, and by men of much higher spiritual achievements:

    One day John, the brother of James [these are the sons of Zebedee], was going up to the Temple. A Pharisee by the name of Arimanios came up to him and challenged him, asking: “Where is the teacher you used to follow?”

    John replied, “He has gone back to the place from which he came.”

    The Pharisee said, “That Nazarene misled you (plural), told you lies, closed your hearts and turned you away from your ancestral traditions.”

    When I heard these things, I, John, turned away from the temple and went off to a deserted mountainous place. I was very unhappy, saying to myself:

    “How was the Savior designated?
    Why did his Father send him into the world?
    Who is his Father?
    What kind of realm will we go to?

    For, although he told us, ‘This realm is modeled on the imperishable realm,’
    He didn’t teach us about the latter.”

    http://www.gnosis.org/naghamm/apocjn-davies.html

    I am pretty sure the Blind Watchmaker would agree with my choice of scriptural references.

    You have a great weekend!

    🙂

  57. @German_reader
    @Mr. Hack

    Is your pro-Ukrainian activism not enough, do you also have to be the worst kind of self-satisfied boomer? Seriously, going on about "careers" in fast food restaurants while completely ignoring songbird's point about the escalating diversity regime, that's really a bit much.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Wokechoke

    The economy in my neck of the woods (>1000 mi from Phoenix) also is booming. If the end of the world is on the way it certainly has a deceptive prelude.

    Ted Kaczynski says the technological singularity has already happened.

    • Replies: @A123
    @Emil Nikola Richard


    The economy in my neck of the woods (>1000 mi from Phoenix) also is booming. If the end of the world is on the way it certainly has a deceptive prelude.
     
    Energy costs and transport issues are causing huge problems in my area.

    As a matter of survival, everyone is trying to pad cash into their piece of any new arrangement. During:

    • Trump's 1st Term -- Everyone could agree on a 12 or 24 month contract.
    • Not-The-President Biden's regime -- Deals running 3 months or less are common.
    ___

    Customers have paid penalties to cancel deals because:

    ♦ Financing fell apart. Gone. Or, unaffordable rates.
    ♦ Their eventual buyer cancelled. And, that cascaded up the chain.

    Major capital plans for expansion are "on hold" pending price/demand predictability returns.

    We have, so far, avoided the dreaded "deferred maintenance" decision. However, some early discussions along those lines have taken place.

    Our local outlook is "scared spitless". Open door, check for grim reaper, then enter room.

    PEACE 😇
  58. Is your pro-Ukrainian activism not enough

    As long as your over the top hysterics about supporting Ukraine remains at a boiling point, my Ukrainian activism will remain intact. I also graduated from college at a time of a long recession and couldn’t find “meaningful” work and had to settle for restaurant type work, so my post about this topic is not devoid of sensitivity. But what can you do? Nowadays it’s well known that a degree in liberal arts is not necessarily an open door to a high paying job or career. In my day, believe it or not, this wasn’t the case. Nobody ever promised you that life would be a rose garden, sometimes you have to make due with what’s being offered.

    • Replies: @German_reader
    @Mr. Hack


    Nowadays it’s well known that a degree in liberal arts is not necessarily an open door to a high paying job or career.
     
    That's besides the point, I doubt the people killing themselves with opioids whom you more or less mocked in your comment are mostly liberal arts graduates, clearly something else is going on. Don't really want to get into a long discussion about this, but I do find it striking how completely incapable of even the slightest self-criticism or of any sympathy for younger generations many boomers in the US and in Western Europe seem to be, really a terrible après moi le déluge mindset.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    , @Mikhail
    @Mr. Hack

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MwHHCZTvQco

  59. The video below is of a particularly deadly German secret weapon code named ‘Sonia’. of which, had Fritz simply had more of them, could well of changed the course of events.

    As it was this weapon was simply developed too late.

    Well, to be specific, it was developed over two decades after the war too late in 1967.

    But, still…

  60. German_reader says:
    @Mr. Hack

    Is your pro-Ukrainian activism not enough
     
    As long as your over the top hysterics about supporting Ukraine remains at a boiling point, my Ukrainian activism will remain intact. I also graduated from college at a time of a long recession and couldn't find "meaningful" work and had to settle for restaurant type work, so my post about this topic is not devoid of sensitivity. But what can you do? Nowadays it's well known that a degree in liberal arts is not necessarily an open door to a high paying job or career. In my day, believe it or not, this wasn't the case. Nobody ever promised you that life would be a rose garden, sometimes you have to make due with what's being offered.

    Replies: @German_reader, @Mikhail

    Nowadays it’s well known that a degree in liberal arts is not necessarily an open door to a high paying job or career.

    That’s besides the point, I doubt the people killing themselves with opioids whom you more or less mocked in your comment are mostly liberal arts graduates, clearly something else is going on. Don’t really want to get into a long discussion about this, but I do find it striking how completely incapable of even the slightest self-criticism or of any sympathy for younger generations many boomers in the US and in Western Europe seem to be, really a terrible après moi le déluge mindset.

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @German_reader

    Well, the younger Americans that I work with and sit next to at work, are very hard working and intelligent, so I don't have the time nor the desire to feel sorry for a lot of the lazy couch potatoes that chose to sit on the couch all day long and complain. I never ask them if the have college degrees or not (I suspect that a some of them don't), and they seem quite able to focus and master the work that is put out in front of them.

    I do know of one opioid user that has ruined his life and has put quite a strain on his immediate family. He was church going acquaintance, that had a great degree in chemistry, a beautiful wife and 3 really nice looking boys, and a beautiful house on the periphery of the city . He exchanged all of this for a life of pursuing opioids, visiting rehab centers and hanging around really lousy people. He always seems to find great excuses about why he ended up this way, and at this point I've told him that only God can help him, and I leave it at that...

  61. @Wokechoke
    @Yevardian

    Ukies worship antitank guns and proffer sainthood upon them. I suspect there will be sects who bow before Drones.

    Replies: @LatW, @Mikhail

    I suspect there will be sects who bow before Drones.

    Some pets are named Bayraktar. Not kids yet, hopefully. Pretty cool to have a little French bulldog named Bayraktar. 🙂

  62. @German_reader
    @Mr. Hack


    Nowadays it’s well known that a degree in liberal arts is not necessarily an open door to a high paying job or career.
     
    That's besides the point, I doubt the people killing themselves with opioids whom you more or less mocked in your comment are mostly liberal arts graduates, clearly something else is going on. Don't really want to get into a long discussion about this, but I do find it striking how completely incapable of even the slightest self-criticism or of any sympathy for younger generations many boomers in the US and in Western Europe seem to be, really a terrible après moi le déluge mindset.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    Well, the younger Americans that I work with and sit next to at work, are very hard working and intelligent, so I don’t have the time nor the desire to feel sorry for a lot of the lazy couch potatoes that chose to sit on the couch all day long and complain. I never ask them if the have college degrees or not (I suspect that a some of them don’t), and they seem quite able to focus and master the work that is put out in front of them.

    I do know of one opioid user that has ruined his life and has put quite a strain on his immediate family. He was church going acquaintance, that had a great degree in chemistry, a beautiful wife and 3 really nice looking boys, and a beautiful house on the periphery of the city . He exchanged all of this for a life of pursuing opioids, visiting rehab centers and hanging around really lousy people. He always seems to find great excuses about why he ended up this way, and at this point I’ve told him that only God can help him, and I leave it at that…

  63. @Matra
    The Visegrad crew now advocating Islamic terrorism. I'm noticing a drop in sympathy from Western Europeans who communicate online in English and French for these supposedly based Central/Eastern European countries like Poland. Germans with any self-respect - assuming there are some left - must be looking at the reaction to Nord Stream from Poland & the Baltics along with the WW2 grifting and drawing conclusions about their 'allies'. Hungary is still fine but no reason left to care anymore about Poles and Baltoids. They have too much undigested history, too big a chip on their shoulders, and too selfish & pig-headed in general.

    In other news nearly 630k Ukrainians have applied for temporary resident status - in Canada whether students or special circumstances like this war there is almost no such thing as temporary status, permanent status will follow. Over 312k have already been accepted. Given Canada's family unification policies and lack of clarity regarding how many of these applications do not include dependent relatives & soldiers left behind its possible that something like 2-3%, maybe more if the war drags on, of Ukraine's entire pre-war population could end up in Canada. A lot of these will be young people. Even with a Ukrainian victory, however that is defined, the future of Ukraine doesn't look good.

    Replies: @German_reader, @Wokechoke, @AP, @S

    I’m noticing a drop in sympathy from Western Europeans who communicate online in English and French for these supposedly based Central/Eastern European countries like Poland.

    A combination of the phenomenon of useful-for-Russia idiots who see a savior in Putin and therefore hatred for his enemies, and resentment of peoples who are superior to them and highlight their own faults. Peoples who actually fight for their homelands rather than invite in invaders who displace them, peoples who demand money rather than give it to those who replace them in their own lands, peoples who retain a high level of physical beauty that has been fading among the Westerners, etc.

    In other news nearly 630k Ukrainians have applied for temporary resident status – in Canada

    I’d guess most of the ones in Germany and Poland will return (my own have come back in summer to central Ukraine from the Rhineland where they went in March when Russians were threatening Kiev and Zhytomir) but most of the ones in North America will stay: it is further away and more difficult to come back. Though by no means will they all stay, many husbands and brothers have remained in Ukraine so there is a reason to return.

    Be careful, it will take longer for Canada to become an Indian-Chinese homeland (Singapore North) where Anglo servants kowtow before their new Chinese and Hindu elites, with all of those young Eastern Europeans refugees boosting the European population.

    • Replies: @sher singh
    @AP


    Be careful, it will take longer for Canada to become an Indian-Chinese homeland (Singapore North) where Anglo servants kowtow before their new Chinese and Hindu elites, with all of those young Eastern Europeans refugees boosting the European population.
     
    6 lakh is about a year's immigration. 20 Lakh with family unification is like 3..
    Ukr also suck at subtlety - their hate crimes/RW terrorism further the narrative.

    The avg White sees Ukraine getting billions while Syria or w/e gets nothing.
    They can sleep for 20 years knowing Whites matter more even as a multicultural minority.

    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ
    , @Dmitry
    @AP


    peoples who demand money rather than give it to those
     
    Poor countries "demanding money" from rich countries, is apparently something which you see as positive about the poor countries and negative for the rich countries?

    Because rich countries of Western Europe which have successful economy have given more than $100 billion to Poland, this is something you see as positive about Poland? Not the other way? So, better (not in moral sense) to be beggar, than the person who gives to the beggar, who has the productive society and the hardworking population that allows them to give to the beggar?


    those who replace them in their own lands
     
    Because within the EU system, significant parts of the populations of Eastern European countries emigrate to Western Europe. There is no significant emigration of Western Europeans to live in Poland, but there are millions of Poles emigrating to Western Europe. But this is because the life is better on average significantly in Western Europe, often to say mildly. It's not some kind of indicator of success for the origin country of the emigrants that it produces this migration direction, but it is indicator of the success of the destination country that people go there to "upgrade their life".

    Canada to become an Indian-Chinese homeland (Singapore North) where Anglo servants kowtow before their new Chinese and Hindu elites
     
    Emigration of Eastern Europeans to Canada will surely merge to the immigrants from India and China, more than helping to recreate the anglosaxon history or British empire. It's increasing the internationalization or multinationalism of Canada, whether you view as good or bad. If it becomes like Singapore in the utopian example, or like Balkans/Lebanon in the dystopian.

    Replies: @A123, @Coconuts, @AP

  64. @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Bashibuzuk

    Thank you.

    I will look at your recommended sources I have not seen before, although it will definitely take more than a day!

    In the meantime, have a look at Alan Moore's deity:

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/de/Glycon_%2851644816839%29.jpg/678px-Glycon_%2851644816839%29.jpg

    The Brill publication which retails for 330 dollars is 42 minutes of downloading time from libgen away!

    Is this a sin?

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk, @S

    Reminds me of the Thulsa Doom character in Conan the Barbarian.

    Anyhow, the self proclaimed ‘progressive’ types can’t help themselves with the race mixing thing.

    Like that Ice Age Columbus clip I recently posted which featured the primordial European Solutrean chief who was obviously half Cree (and half Scot), European peoples are not supposed to have anything to themselves.

    Truth is a dangerous thing to the powers that be.

  65. @sher singh
    The Karlin discord is full of:

    1. Angry American White Nationalists who believe:
    • Being White = Automatically Vedic Upper Caste
    • Aryans Eat Beef
    • Circumcision is Trad
    • Everyone wants to be White
    • Non-White Gangs don’t control large parts of the USA (cities)

    2. Weirdos:
    • Half white Copt defending smelling his dad’s dick or measuring his mom/sisters labia
    • German-American (mixed) White Nationalist who thinks poking at poop in the toilet is cool.
    • Random SinoBoos who defend China at the drop of a hat, while being White Nationalists

    3. Random LatAms & Chinese:
    • They hate India for being a brown country with culture
    • Refuse to remain on topic, and try to suck up to the wignats
    • Asian trolls who hate Indians, but are turned on by Indian Man Chinese Woman couples

    To top it all off most of them value religion, but hate religiosity – calling it a larp, cope or w/e

    "I don't let any dieties control my life"

    Truly a circus,

    Replies: @Yevardian, @Barbarossa

    “I don’t let any dieties control my life”

    Hey, I don’t let any dieties control my life either, I eat whatever I please!

    • LOL: A123
    • Replies: @sher singh
    @Barbarossa

    Wrong man to have that convo with.
    You don't eat dogs, cats, snakes or horses.

    Your preferences are shaped by those who took your foreskin||
    Aryans have Maryada - a clear code - it'll please you to save your life in the interest of cow protection||

    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ

    Replies: @Barbarossa

  66. @Mikhail
    The Wishful Theory of ‘Strategic Russian Defeat
    https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2022-10-19/strategic-russian-defeat-is-not-a-viable-solution-to-the-war-in-ukraine

    ####

    Some feedback from elsewhere:

    I’m seeing more and more ‘anal-y-ses’ & ‘opinions’ in the PPNN about the Ukraine that are even more vague than normal. You are left with the impression that the author wants to say something but the author themselves have not thought through what it is they even want to say. Technically it is ‘content’ but it provides nothing new, either in insight, information or anything else. I guess what we can say is that now that it is clear to most of these idiots that the Ukraine will not win, they are forced in to unfamiliar territory that they have not considered and are lost in the woods. I expect more of this thrashing about to come.

    &

    Also, as soon as I got to this sentence, I stopped reading:

    “Fiona Hill, one of the most respected Russia experts in the US and a former Russia guru in the Trump administration, offered a less radical version of the same argument in a recent interview with Politico.”

    If Bershidsky rates Hill as ‘one of the most respected Russia experts’, that’s all I need to know. Fiona Hill could find a samovar in the space where she left her car when she was ready to go home, and she would only mutter peevishly, “What’s this big stupid brass car doing here, my key won’t fit it”. She is a simpleton in every derogatory sense of the word, I would have thought Bershidsky was too intelligent to fall for her mad ravings. Perhaps his hatred for Putin has overcome his judgement.

    Replies: @Pixo

    That’s a good and balanced article.

    Russia has already been defeated, its reputation, influence in the West, economy and military have been permanently damaged.

    As much as I am on the side of Ukraine, it isn’t comfortable to be on the same side as the MIC Russia-haters.

    Now seems a good time for us to be a gracious winner and negotiate something reasonable.

    • Disagree: Mikhail
    • Replies: @LatW
    @Pixo


    Now seems a good time for us to be a gracious winner and negotiate something reasonable.
     
    Those who are doing the actual physical fighting will be doing the negotiating. Those who helped can have a say but only with close alignment with the one who's doing the fighting and dying.

    And that includes the Russian Volunteer Corps and the Legion Freedom of Russia.

    , @Mikhail
    @Pixo


    That’s a good and balanced article.

    Russia has already been defeated, its reputation, influence in the West, economy and military have been permanently damaged.

    As much as I am on the side of Ukraine, it isn’t comfortable to be on the same side as the MIC Russia-haters.

    Now seems a good time for us to be a gracious winner and negotiate something reasonable.

     

    The replies I posted to that article are good and balanced. Russia isn't losing and will not lose.
  67. @Emil Nikola Richard
    @German_reader

    The economy in my neck of the woods (>1000 mi from Phoenix) also is booming. If the end of the world is on the way it certainly has a deceptive prelude.

    Ted Kaczynski says the technological singularity has already happened.

    Replies: @A123

    The economy in my neck of the woods (>1000 mi from Phoenix) also is booming. If the end of the world is on the way it certainly has a deceptive prelude.

    Energy costs and transport issues are causing huge problems in my area.

    As a matter of survival, everyone is trying to pad cash into their piece of any new arrangement. During:

    • Trump’s 1st Term — Everyone could agree on a 12 or 24 month contract.
    • Not-The-President Biden’s regime — Deals running 3 months or less are common.
    ___

    Customers have paid penalties to cancel deals because:

    ♦ Financing fell apart. Gone. Or, unaffordable rates.
    ♦ Their eventual buyer cancelled. And, that cascaded up the chain.

    Major capital plans for expansion are “on hold” pending price/demand predictability returns.

    We have, so far, avoided the dreaded “deferred maintenance” decision. However, some early discussions along those lines have taken place.

    Our local outlook is “scared spitless“. Open door, check for grim reaper, then enter room.

    PEACE 😇

  68. @German_reader
    @sudden death

    The question is how to deal with that aggression. Balts, who must be some of the most myopic and emotionally incontinent peoples at least in the northern hemisphere, regularly come up with brilliant proposals like this (from a former high-ranking Estonian general):

    https://twitter.com/RihoTerras/status/1582039802018680832?cxt=HHwWgMDSvay0xPQrAAAA

    Not content with agitating for war with Russia, Baltic politicians like the stupid bitch running Estonia are now criticizing Scholz' upcoming trip to China, clamouring that there needs to be a common European position...which just means adopting the position of the most hardline American crusaders and their framework of a Manichaean zero sum struggle between "democracies" and "autocracies". I don't know what sort of supermen Balts imagine themselves to be, they seem awfully keen on taking not just on Russia, but on an entire Sino-Russian-Iranian bloc, that has mostly just come into being because of American policies.

    Replies: @Matra

    I can’t recall the details but the former Estonian President, who is one of the most obnoxious former leaders on earth, recently suggested that once the war is over Ukraine should consider ditching Cyrillic script for Latin. He cited Ataturk getting rid of Arabic script as an example to follow. I know most Ukrainians embrace a Western identity these days but I’d be surprised if Ukrainian language speakers were willing to go that far but who knows. Maybe AP would have insight on such a possibility.

    • Replies: @German_reader
    @Matra


    but the former Estonian President, who is one of the most obnoxious former leaders on earth
     
    I suppose that's the charming fellow with John McCain on the top of his Twitter profile?
    Anyway, supposedly the head of Ukraine's national security council has said the Russian language should disappear from Ukrainian territory (can't evaluate it for myself, since I understand neither Russian nor Ukrainian):

    https://mobile.twitter.com/OleksiyDanilov/status/1583322279362318336
    It's crazy that Western Europeans are expected to uncritically support such an agenda, while their own nations are being dismantled, and getting nothing but insults and continually escalating demands from the "based" Easterners.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @AP, @Wokechoke

    , @AP
    @Matra

    A minority of Ukrainians say the same, but it is very much a minority. Much more popular is the wish to change the Church calendars over to the Western one so that holidays are celebrated at the same time. I think a lot of churches have already made that change.

    , @LatW
    @Matra


    I can’t recall the details but the former Estonian President, who is one of the most obnoxious former leaders on earth, recently suggested that once the war is over Ukraine should consider ditching Cyrillic script for Latin.
     
    That's not for him to meddle with (if he really said that), so he should stay quiet about it.
  69. @songbird
    @A123

    I think that, in order for the US to stand any chance at fixing its problems, it would need to close its borders, for at least ten years. Complete moratorium, and from the rhetoric I hear, I don't see how its possible. Hard to halt, when the founding mythos has been deconstructed, and the founding stock villified.

    One of the problems with open borders, IMO, is that it dominates the political rhetoric, so that the national looking glass is shattered, and there can't be any introspection.

    I view DIE as a very severe problem, but to a certain extent it is combinational. We would still be suffering from the some of the same problems that East Asians have, even without DIE.

    Part of it is generational. Hierarchies form. The old dominate and protect their positions. The rising cost of housing and credentialism is seen as a boon by them, in many cases. They get carve outs because of their seniority while the young pay the cost of DIE the most, and don't get hired or promoted.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @A123

    I think that, in order for the US to stand any chance at fixing its problems, it would need to close its borders, for at least ten years.

    Complete moratorium, and from the rhetoric I hear, I don’t see how its possible. Hard to halt, when the founding mythos has been deconstructed, and the founding stock villified.

    A great deal can be achieved without “complete”. A couple of examples:

    Asylum claims allowed only if the U.S. is “First Safe Country”. Mexico is “Safe”, so that would eliminate the vast majority of So the & Central American asylum seekers right there.

    The idea of citizenship by “drop location” is clearly not in the 14th Amendment. SCOTUS could easily support simple logic the the children of unknowns, tourist visas, and illegals are citizens of their home country (not America).

    PEACE 😇

  70. German_reader says:
    @Matra
    @German_reader

    I can't recall the details but the former Estonian President, who is one of the most obnoxious former leaders on earth, recently suggested that once the war is over Ukraine should consider ditching Cyrillic script for Latin. He cited Ataturk getting rid of Arabic script as an example to follow. I know most Ukrainians embrace a Western identity these days but I'd be surprised if Ukrainian language speakers were willing to go that far but who knows. Maybe AP would have insight on such a possibility.

    Replies: @German_reader, @AP, @LatW

    but the former Estonian President, who is one of the most obnoxious former leaders on earth

    I suppose that’s the charming fellow with John McCain on the top of his Twitter profile?
    Anyway, supposedly the head of Ukraine’s national security council has said the Russian language should disappear from Ukrainian territory (can’t evaluate it for myself, since I understand neither Russian nor Ukrainian):

    [MORE]

    https://mobile.twitter.com/OleksiyDanilov/status/1583322279362318336
    It’s crazy that Western Europeans are expected to uncritically support such an agenda, while their own nations are being dismantled, and getting nothing but insults and continually escalating demands from the “based” Easterners.

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @German_reader

    You've got to admit that the imagery is wonderful. Reminds me of the stuff Karlin used to paste here to great aplomb:

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FfqtSuRXEAIf6hq?format=jpg&name=large

    Remember, the good old days?:

    https://www.unz.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/na-korable-polden.jpg

    Replies: @German_reader, @Mikhail

    , @AP
    @German_reader

    A lot of Russian-speakers from Ukraine want Russian to be gone from Ukraine. They tell themselves they themselves will stop speaking Russian, but slip and revert to Russian (like a broken New Year's resolution). But they want to make sure their kids, unlike them, will not be Russian speakers. They want that language to disappear from Ukraine eventually.

    It's a rather predictable backlash to Putin invading and killing people (mostly Russian-speakers!) in order to preserve the Russian language.

    Replies: @Beckow, @German_reader

    , @Wokechoke
    @German_reader

    A Jewish head of state in Europe is an evil thing. End of story. I know you are not allowed to say such things in Germany but the evidence is in.

    Replies: @A123

  71. @Matra
    @German_reader

    I can't recall the details but the former Estonian President, who is one of the most obnoxious former leaders on earth, recently suggested that once the war is over Ukraine should consider ditching Cyrillic script for Latin. He cited Ataturk getting rid of Arabic script as an example to follow. I know most Ukrainians embrace a Western identity these days but I'd be surprised if Ukrainian language speakers were willing to go that far but who knows. Maybe AP would have insight on such a possibility.

    Replies: @German_reader, @AP, @LatW

    A minority of Ukrainians say the same, but it is very much a minority. Much more popular is the wish to change the Church calendars over to the Western one so that holidays are celebrated at the same time. I think a lot of churches have already made that change.

  72. @German_reader
    @Matra


    but the former Estonian President, who is one of the most obnoxious former leaders on earth
     
    I suppose that's the charming fellow with John McCain on the top of his Twitter profile?
    Anyway, supposedly the head of Ukraine's national security council has said the Russian language should disappear from Ukrainian territory (can't evaluate it for myself, since I understand neither Russian nor Ukrainian):

    https://mobile.twitter.com/OleksiyDanilov/status/1583322279362318336
    It's crazy that Western Europeans are expected to uncritically support such an agenda, while their own nations are being dismantled, and getting nothing but insults and continually escalating demands from the "based" Easterners.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @AP, @Wokechoke

    You’ve got to admit that the imagery is wonderful. Reminds me of the stuff Karlin used to paste here to great aplomb:

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FfqtSuRXEAIf6hq?format=jpg&name=large

    Remember, the good old days?:

    • Replies: @German_reader
    @Mr. Hack


    Reminds me of the stuff Karlin used to paste here to great aplomb:
     
    I thought back then it was delusional megalomania, and it looks even dumber now.
    , @Mikhail
    @Mr. Hack

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dlYPGjXy_LA

  73. @German_reader
    @Matra


    but the former Estonian President, who is one of the most obnoxious former leaders on earth
     
    I suppose that's the charming fellow with John McCain on the top of his Twitter profile?
    Anyway, supposedly the head of Ukraine's national security council has said the Russian language should disappear from Ukrainian territory (can't evaluate it for myself, since I understand neither Russian nor Ukrainian):

    https://mobile.twitter.com/OleksiyDanilov/status/1583322279362318336
    It's crazy that Western Europeans are expected to uncritically support such an agenda, while their own nations are being dismantled, and getting nothing but insults and continually escalating demands from the "based" Easterners.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @AP, @Wokechoke

    A lot of Russian-speakers from Ukraine want Russian to be gone from Ukraine. They tell themselves they themselves will stop speaking Russian, but slip and revert to Russian (like a broken New Year’s resolution). But they want to make sure their kids, unlike them, will not be Russian speakers. They want that language to disappear from Ukraine eventually.

    It’s a rather predictable backlash to Putin invading and killing people (mostly Russian-speakers!) in order to preserve the Russian language.

    • Replies: @Beckow
    @AP


    Russian-speakers from Ukraine want Russian to be gone from Ukraine. They tell themselves they themselves will stop speaking Russian...they want that language to disappear from Ukraine eventually.
     
    That's is counter-intuitive and unnatural. If you believe it, you need to meet some real people from there. I do all the time, and we talk - always in Russian no matter where they are from in Ukraine - and they have never expressed that sentiment. You are politicizing people's identity - imagine similar stuff about any other country-language. Your anger (maybe outright hatred) is getting better of you.

    Language is a very sticky thing to abandon, especially a highly cultured language like Russian that generations grew up with. It is simply not going to happen because things like that don't happen and because the Russians in Ukraine are not who you claim they are based on some sporadic interactions with your cousins - who are more likely to leave and end up shifting to English.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @AP

    , @German_reader
    @AP


    A lot of Russian-speakers from Ukraine want Russian to be gone from Ukraine.
     
    "A lot" doesn't mean all, and there's a difference between people doing it on their own accord and a high official implying it should be a kind of political programme. It's also incompatible with Ukraine's alleged European aspirations, but since the EU will probably founder on this crisis, I suppose that's not going to matter anyway.

    Replies: @AP

  74. @German_reader
    @Matra


    but the former Estonian President, who is one of the most obnoxious former leaders on earth
     
    I suppose that's the charming fellow with John McCain on the top of his Twitter profile?
    Anyway, supposedly the head of Ukraine's national security council has said the Russian language should disappear from Ukrainian territory (can't evaluate it for myself, since I understand neither Russian nor Ukrainian):

    https://mobile.twitter.com/OleksiyDanilov/status/1583322279362318336
    It's crazy that Western Europeans are expected to uncritically support such an agenda, while their own nations are being dismantled, and getting nothing but insults and continually escalating demands from the "based" Easterners.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @AP, @Wokechoke

    A Jewish head of state in Europe is an evil thing. End of story. I know you are not allowed to say such things in Germany but the evidence is in.

    • Replies: @A123
    @Wokechoke

    Zemmour in France, eliminating MENA origin migration, would have been a glorious thing.

    The problem with Zelensky is not his parentage. It his allegiance to the European WEF. Indigenous Palestinian Jews (such as Likud members) are very annoyed at Zelensky.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Yevardian

  75. @German_reader
    @Mr. Hack

    Is your pro-Ukrainian activism not enough, do you also have to be the worst kind of self-satisfied boomer? Seriously, going on about "careers" in fast food restaurants while completely ignoring songbird's point about the escalating diversity regime, that's really a bit much.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Wokechoke

    Who say’s Hack isn’t a you know what…

  76. @AP
    @German_reader

    A lot of Russian-speakers from Ukraine want Russian to be gone from Ukraine. They tell themselves they themselves will stop speaking Russian, but slip and revert to Russian (like a broken New Year's resolution). But they want to make sure their kids, unlike them, will not be Russian speakers. They want that language to disappear from Ukraine eventually.

    It's a rather predictable backlash to Putin invading and killing people (mostly Russian-speakers!) in order to preserve the Russian language.

    Replies: @Beckow, @German_reader

    Russian-speakers from Ukraine want Russian to be gone from Ukraine. They tell themselves they themselves will stop speaking Russian…they want that language to disappear from Ukraine eventually.

    That’s is counter-intuitive and unnatural. If you believe it, you need to meet some real people from there. I do all the time, and we talk – always in Russian no matter where they are from in Ukraine – and they have never expressed that sentiment. You are politicizing people’s identity – imagine similar stuff about any other country-language. Your anger (maybe outright hatred) is getting better of you.

    Language is a very sticky thing to abandon, especially a highly cultured language like Russian that generations grew up with. It is simply not going to happen because things like that don’t happen and because the Russians in Ukraine are not who you claim they are based on some sporadic interactions with your cousins – who are more likely to leave and end up shifting to English.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @Beckow

    Vyacheslav Boguslayev, CEO of Motor Sich. Arrested by the Jew of Kiev and the SBU. Motor Sich sold arms to Russia. wow! Life sentence.


    It's never good to make a Jew the actual head of state. It cannot be a good thing. Actual people who are invested there and run useful businesses are getting torched left right and center by these jumped up yids and their henchmen.


    I guess Ukraine expects all the gear will now come from the US and UK.

    , @AP
    @Beckow


    That’s is counter-intuitive and unnatural.
     
    Nonsense. If Gaelic weren't so hard probably a lot of English-speaking Irish people in a conflict zone like Northern Ireland would try to do the same. But these Russian-speakers already can speak and understand Ukrainian, they just use Russian more often because it is easier for them.

    If you believe it, you need to meet some real people from there
     
    I literally know such people who are in Ukraine. And some friends from Moscow have Ukrainian relatives like that, the Muscovites are amazed when they talk about it. Almost all Ukrainians are bilingual, the Russians-speakers are simply those for whom Russian comes a little easier. Many of them are deciding they will now, as a principle, try to get used to speaking Ukrainian only. I don't pretend to know what percentage of Russian-speakers in Ukraine think like this, but it must be a significant one because I've seen the sentiment expressed by various people in Ukraine who are not related to each other.

    I do all the time, and we talk – always in Russian no matter where they are from in Ukraine –
     
    Would you be capable of speaking Ukrainian with them? Is their English better than their Russian? Otherwise, what other language would they speak with you?

    and they have never expressed that sentiment.
     
    Well, either it has not come up, or your well-established reputation for dishonesty is at work again.

    You should ask what they think of it, not that I would expect an honest report back from you. Though if they left early in the war and haven't been bombed they might not be as zealous as those in Ukraine.

    Language is a very sticky thing to abandon, especially a highly cultured language like Russian that generations grew up with. It is simply not going to happen because things like that don’t happen
     
    The Russian-speakers of Lviv mostly abandoned that language already. Even the ethnic Russian minority in that city is mostly Ukrainian-speaking now, at least the ones who grew up after independence (people under 35). Kiev has seen a slow increase in Ukrainian before the Russian invasion. This will now accelerate.

    In Ukraine's case it is mostly ethnic Ukrainian Russian-speakers deciding that they will quit that language. It is too early to tell if they stick to it, or course. They might backtrack if the war ends and emotions settle down (how many people promise to go to the gym at New Year's but slack of after a few months?). But policies can stay longer. They might get rid of the Russian primary schools too (why not? Russians pretend such schools don't exist anyways when they lie that Ukraine has no Russian schools), take Russian off the airwaves.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @A123, @Beckow

  77. German_reader says:
    @AP
    @German_reader

    A lot of Russian-speakers from Ukraine want Russian to be gone from Ukraine. They tell themselves they themselves will stop speaking Russian, but slip and revert to Russian (like a broken New Year's resolution). But they want to make sure their kids, unlike them, will not be Russian speakers. They want that language to disappear from Ukraine eventually.

    It's a rather predictable backlash to Putin invading and killing people (mostly Russian-speakers!) in order to preserve the Russian language.

    Replies: @Beckow, @German_reader

    A lot of Russian-speakers from Ukraine want Russian to be gone from Ukraine.

    “A lot” doesn’t mean all, and there’s a difference between people doing it on their own accord and a high official implying it should be a kind of political programme. It’s also incompatible with Ukraine’s alleged European aspirations, but since the EU will probably founder on this crisis, I suppose that’s not going to matter anyway.

    • Replies: @AP
    @German_reader


    “A lot” doesn’t mean all, and there’s a difference between people doing it on their own accord and a high official implying it should be a kind of political programme
     
    If enough voters demand it, it will happen.

    . It’s also incompatible with Ukraine’s alleged European aspirations, but since the EU will probably founder on this crisis
     
    As I've explained to Beckow in earlier discussions, both France and the Baltics have such policies. In Ukraine's case it would be both anti-colonial which the Left wouldn't object to, and nationalist/nativist which the Right wouldn't object to.

    Replies: @LatW

  78. German_reader says:
    @Mr. Hack
    @German_reader

    You've got to admit that the imagery is wonderful. Reminds me of the stuff Karlin used to paste here to great aplomb:

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FfqtSuRXEAIf6hq?format=jpg&name=large

    Remember, the good old days?:

    https://www.unz.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/na-korable-polden.jpg

    Replies: @German_reader, @Mikhail

    Reminds me of the stuff Karlin used to paste here to great aplomb:

    I thought back then it was delusional megalomania, and it looks even dumber now.

    • Agree: Barbarossa
  79. @Wokechoke
    @German_reader

    A Jewish head of state in Europe is an evil thing. End of story. I know you are not allowed to say such things in Germany but the evidence is in.

    Replies: @A123

    Zemmour in France, eliminating MENA origin migration, would have been a glorious thing.

    The problem with Zelensky is not his parentage. It his allegiance to the European WEF. Indigenous Palestinian Jews (such as Likud members) are very annoyed at Zelensky.

    PEACE 😇

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @A123

    Zemmour would have trigger "Fall Gelb" again somehow. Just like that heeb, French President Leon Blum ultimately did.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%C3%A9on_Blum

    , @Yevardian
    @A123

    Zemmour is an Algerian Jew you cretin.

    Replies: @A123

  80. @Beckow
    @AP


    Russian-speakers from Ukraine want Russian to be gone from Ukraine. They tell themselves they themselves will stop speaking Russian...they want that language to disappear from Ukraine eventually.
     
    That's is counter-intuitive and unnatural. If you believe it, you need to meet some real people from there. I do all the time, and we talk - always in Russian no matter where they are from in Ukraine - and they have never expressed that sentiment. You are politicizing people's identity - imagine similar stuff about any other country-language. Your anger (maybe outright hatred) is getting better of you.

    Language is a very sticky thing to abandon, especially a highly cultured language like Russian that generations grew up with. It is simply not going to happen because things like that don't happen and because the Russians in Ukraine are not who you claim they are based on some sporadic interactions with your cousins - who are more likely to leave and end up shifting to English.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @AP

    Vyacheslav Boguslayev, CEO of Motor Sich. Arrested by the Jew of Kiev and the SBU. Motor Sich sold arms to Russia. wow! Life sentence.

    It’s never good to make a Jew the actual head of state. It cannot be a good thing. Actual people who are invested there and run useful businesses are getting torched left right and center by these jumped up yids and their henchmen.

    I guess Ukraine expects all the gear will now come from the US and UK.

  81. @Mr. Hack
    @songbird


    the young pay the cost of DIE the most, and don’t get hired or promoted.
     
    Did you mean :the young pay the cost and DIE the most, and don't get hired or promoted
     Still plenty of "help wanted" signs in my neck of the woods. McDonalds and Burger King start at no les than $15 an hour. That means that a young couple could make possibly $62,400/year. No reason to go off of the deep end and end it all by overdosing on opioids...

    https://www.syracuse.com/resizer/tlZI9-qS6Nvxt6F6U6Elqo7h1AQ=/800x0/smart/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/advancelocal/C7VQMZZCWJGIVIC4AQ6BTUIMCI.jpg

    Replies: @German_reader, @songbird

    Haha. Very amusing – you sound like a Sackler exec.

    BTW, which national TV network’s evening news broadcast do you tune into daily at 6:30 PM (or Mountain Time equivalent?)

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @songbird

    "Sackler exec"? "a you know what"? I must be the ghost of the chameleon man? :-)

    If I do watch the evening news, it's the ABC version with host David Muir (he's the one that my roommate likes to watch). Otherwise, I prefer getting my news here at UNZ Review, second hand. :-)

  82. @Beckow
    @AP


    Russian-speakers from Ukraine want Russian to be gone from Ukraine. They tell themselves they themselves will stop speaking Russian...they want that language to disappear from Ukraine eventually.
     
    That's is counter-intuitive and unnatural. If you believe it, you need to meet some real people from there. I do all the time, and we talk - always in Russian no matter where they are from in Ukraine - and they have never expressed that sentiment. You are politicizing people's identity - imagine similar stuff about any other country-language. Your anger (maybe outright hatred) is getting better of you.

    Language is a very sticky thing to abandon, especially a highly cultured language like Russian that generations grew up with. It is simply not going to happen because things like that don't happen and because the Russians in Ukraine are not who you claim they are based on some sporadic interactions with your cousins - who are more likely to leave and end up shifting to English.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @AP

    That’s is counter-intuitive and unnatural.

    Nonsense. If Gaelic weren’t so hard probably a lot of English-speaking Irish people in a conflict zone like Northern Ireland would try to do the same. But these Russian-speakers already can speak and understand Ukrainian, they just use Russian more often because it is easier for them.

    If you believe it, you need to meet some real people from there

    I literally know such people who are in Ukraine. And some friends from Moscow have Ukrainian relatives like that, the Muscovites are amazed when they talk about it. Almost all Ukrainians are bilingual, the Russians-speakers are simply those for whom Russian comes a little easier. Many of them are deciding they will now, as a principle, try to get used to speaking Ukrainian only. I don’t pretend to know what percentage of Russian-speakers in Ukraine think like this, but it must be a significant one because I’ve seen the sentiment expressed by various people in Ukraine who are not related to each other.

    I do all the time, and we talk – always in Russian no matter where they are from in Ukraine –

    Would you be capable of speaking Ukrainian with them? Is their English better than their Russian? Otherwise, what other language would they speak with you?

    and they have never expressed that sentiment.

    Well, either it has not come up, or your well-established reputation for dishonesty is at work again.

    You should ask what they think of it, not that I would expect an honest report back from you. Though if they left early in the war and haven’t been bombed they might not be as zealous as those in Ukraine.

    Language is a very sticky thing to abandon, especially a highly cultured language like Russian that generations grew up with. It is simply not going to happen because things like that don’t happen

    The Russian-speakers of Lviv mostly abandoned that language already. Even the ethnic Russian minority in that city is mostly Ukrainian-speaking now, at least the ones who grew up after independence (people under 35). Kiev has seen a slow increase in Ukrainian before the Russian invasion. This will now accelerate.

    In Ukraine’s case it is mostly ethnic Ukrainian Russian-speakers deciding that they will quit that language. It is too early to tell if they stick to it, or course. They might backtrack if the war ends and emotions settle down (how many people promise to go to the gym at New Year’s but slack of after a few months?). But policies can stay longer. They might get rid of the Russian primary schools too (why not? Russians pretend such schools don’t exist anyways when they lie that Ukraine has no Russian schools), take Russian off the airwaves.

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @AP

    I watch a lot of the Ukrainian news sources now presented through YouTube. I'm really amazed at how many English language words have recently permeated the Ukrainian language. The one that real irks me lately is "фиксуємо" (to fix something) where the perfectly sturdy and long used "направимо" is more than sufficient.

    , @A123
    @AP

    Almost everyone in Ireland speaks English. It is the necessary language for business-to-business commerce.

     
    https://thelanguagenerds.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/English_speakers_Europe.png
     

    Trying to compare "Ireland / Northern Ireland" to Ukraine is not productive. Anyone who wants to use Irish Gaelic as a social language in NI is free to do so.
    ____

    There is a much better parallel to the terrorist truck bombing of Ukie-stan extremists.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @songbird

    , @Beckow
    @AP

    Your 'analysis' is roughly on a level of a 12-year old, a total disconnect from reality. I and others explained to you why Russians in Ukraine without Russian language will not happen - and should not. Check out the current EU rules on minorities and not the quasi-fascist Balts or France from 3 generations ago.

    But you don't respond rationally. Instead you are back to your screaming baby fit: "lies!" If you cannot even understand basic verbal categories, e.g. opinions and projections of what may happen cannot by "lies!", what are you doing on this forum?

    I wish you luck, but you are way over you head. Maybe the poor education caught up with you - or possibly you don't understand critical thinking.

    Replies: @AP

  83. @songbird
    @Mr. Hack

    Haha. Very amusing - you sound like a Sackler exec.

    BTW, which national TV network's evening news broadcast do you tune into daily at 6:30 PM (or Mountain Time equivalent?)

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    “Sackler exec”? “a you know what”? I must be the ghost of the chameleon man? 🙂

    If I do watch the evening news, it’s the ABC version with host David Muir (he’s the one that my roommate likes to watch). Otherwise, I prefer getting my news here at UNZ Review, second hand. 🙂

  84. @AP
    @Beckow


    That’s is counter-intuitive and unnatural.
     
    Nonsense. If Gaelic weren't so hard probably a lot of English-speaking Irish people in a conflict zone like Northern Ireland would try to do the same. But these Russian-speakers already can speak and understand Ukrainian, they just use Russian more often because it is easier for them.

    If you believe it, you need to meet some real people from there
     
    I literally know such people who are in Ukraine. And some friends from Moscow have Ukrainian relatives like that, the Muscovites are amazed when they talk about it. Almost all Ukrainians are bilingual, the Russians-speakers are simply those for whom Russian comes a little easier. Many of them are deciding they will now, as a principle, try to get used to speaking Ukrainian only. I don't pretend to know what percentage of Russian-speakers in Ukraine think like this, but it must be a significant one because I've seen the sentiment expressed by various people in Ukraine who are not related to each other.

    I do all the time, and we talk – always in Russian no matter where they are from in Ukraine –
     
    Would you be capable of speaking Ukrainian with them? Is their English better than their Russian? Otherwise, what other language would they speak with you?

    and they have never expressed that sentiment.
     
    Well, either it has not come up, or your well-established reputation for dishonesty is at work again.

    You should ask what they think of it, not that I would expect an honest report back from you. Though if they left early in the war and haven't been bombed they might not be as zealous as those in Ukraine.

    Language is a very sticky thing to abandon, especially a highly cultured language like Russian that generations grew up with. It is simply not going to happen because things like that don’t happen
     
    The Russian-speakers of Lviv mostly abandoned that language already. Even the ethnic Russian minority in that city is mostly Ukrainian-speaking now, at least the ones who grew up after independence (people under 35). Kiev has seen a slow increase in Ukrainian before the Russian invasion. This will now accelerate.

    In Ukraine's case it is mostly ethnic Ukrainian Russian-speakers deciding that they will quit that language. It is too early to tell if they stick to it, or course. They might backtrack if the war ends and emotions settle down (how many people promise to go to the gym at New Year's but slack of after a few months?). But policies can stay longer. They might get rid of the Russian primary schools too (why not? Russians pretend such schools don't exist anyways when they lie that Ukraine has no Russian schools), take Russian off the airwaves.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @A123, @Beckow

    I watch a lot of the Ukrainian news sources now presented through YouTube. I’m really amazed at how many English language words have recently permeated the Ukrainian language. The one that real irks me lately is “фиксуємо” (to fix something) where the perfectly sturdy and long used “направимо” is more than sufficient.

  85. @Matra
    The Visegrad crew now advocating Islamic terrorism. I'm noticing a drop in sympathy from Western Europeans who communicate online in English and French for these supposedly based Central/Eastern European countries like Poland. Germans with any self-respect - assuming there are some left - must be looking at the reaction to Nord Stream from Poland & the Baltics along with the WW2 grifting and drawing conclusions about their 'allies'. Hungary is still fine but no reason left to care anymore about Poles and Baltoids. They have too much undigested history, too big a chip on their shoulders, and too selfish & pig-headed in general.

    In other news nearly 630k Ukrainians have applied for temporary resident status - in Canada whether students or special circumstances like this war there is almost no such thing as temporary status, permanent status will follow. Over 312k have already been accepted. Given Canada's family unification policies and lack of clarity regarding how many of these applications do not include dependent relatives & soldiers left behind its possible that something like 2-3%, maybe more if the war drags on, of Ukraine's entire pre-war population could end up in Canada. A lot of these will be young people. Even with a Ukrainian victory, however that is defined, the future of Ukraine doesn't look good.

    Replies: @German_reader, @Wokechoke, @AP, @S

    More destruction of identity, ie Russian, Ukrainian, Canadian, and various European states, for now, along with (just getting started) depopulation…just as the behind the scenes instigators of this developing world war have wanted from the start.

    The other two world wars had not dissimilar objectives in regards to identity destruction.

    • Agree: Bashibuzuk
  86. @German_reader
    @AP


    A lot of Russian-speakers from Ukraine want Russian to be gone from Ukraine.
     
    "A lot" doesn't mean all, and there's a difference between people doing it on their own accord and a high official implying it should be a kind of political programme. It's also incompatible with Ukraine's alleged European aspirations, but since the EU will probably founder on this crisis, I suppose that's not going to matter anyway.

    Replies: @AP

    “A lot” doesn’t mean all, and there’s a difference between people doing it on their own accord and a high official implying it should be a kind of political programme

    If enough voters demand it, it will happen.

    . It’s also incompatible with Ukraine’s alleged European aspirations, but since the EU will probably founder on this crisis

    As I’ve explained to Beckow in earlier discussions, both France and the Baltics have such policies. In Ukraine’s case it would be both anti-colonial which the Left wouldn’t object to, and nationalist/nativist which the Right wouldn’t object to.

    • Replies: @LatW
    @AP

    We might want to think about how Russian will be used for diplomatic purposes. There will be a need to communicate with everyone, not just Russians (but also Kazakhs, Caucasians, diaspora Russophones, etc).

    To all who used to call Ukraine fake and gay - why do you care about language when those who supported this invasion (or did not oppose it properly) kept saying that "they are one people"? If they are one people, then who cares if they speak Ukrainian or Russian - it is, after all, one language, according to them.

    Don't dig a grave for another, you might yourself fall in it, as the saying goes.

  87. @A123
    @Wokechoke

    Zemmour in France, eliminating MENA origin migration, would have been a glorious thing.

    The problem with Zelensky is not his parentage. It his allegiance to the European WEF. Indigenous Palestinian Jews (such as Likud members) are very annoyed at Zelensky.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Yevardian

    Zemmour would have trigger “Fall Gelb” again somehow. Just like that heeb, French President Leon Blum ultimately did.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%C3%A9on_Blum

  88. @AP
    @Beckow


    That’s is counter-intuitive and unnatural.
     
    Nonsense. If Gaelic weren't so hard probably a lot of English-speaking Irish people in a conflict zone like Northern Ireland would try to do the same. But these Russian-speakers already can speak and understand Ukrainian, they just use Russian more often because it is easier for them.

    If you believe it, you need to meet some real people from there
     
    I literally know such people who are in Ukraine. And some friends from Moscow have Ukrainian relatives like that, the Muscovites are amazed when they talk about it. Almost all Ukrainians are bilingual, the Russians-speakers are simply those for whom Russian comes a little easier. Many of them are deciding they will now, as a principle, try to get used to speaking Ukrainian only. I don't pretend to know what percentage of Russian-speakers in Ukraine think like this, but it must be a significant one because I've seen the sentiment expressed by various people in Ukraine who are not related to each other.

    I do all the time, and we talk – always in Russian no matter where they are from in Ukraine –
     
    Would you be capable of speaking Ukrainian with them? Is their English better than their Russian? Otherwise, what other language would they speak with you?

    and they have never expressed that sentiment.
     
    Well, either it has not come up, or your well-established reputation for dishonesty is at work again.

    You should ask what they think of it, not that I would expect an honest report back from you. Though if they left early in the war and haven't been bombed they might not be as zealous as those in Ukraine.

    Language is a very sticky thing to abandon, especially a highly cultured language like Russian that generations grew up with. It is simply not going to happen because things like that don’t happen
     
    The Russian-speakers of Lviv mostly abandoned that language already. Even the ethnic Russian minority in that city is mostly Ukrainian-speaking now, at least the ones who grew up after independence (people under 35). Kiev has seen a slow increase in Ukrainian before the Russian invasion. This will now accelerate.

    In Ukraine's case it is mostly ethnic Ukrainian Russian-speakers deciding that they will quit that language. It is too early to tell if they stick to it, or course. They might backtrack if the war ends and emotions settle down (how many people promise to go to the gym at New Year's but slack of after a few months?). But policies can stay longer. They might get rid of the Russian primary schools too (why not? Russians pretend such schools don't exist anyways when they lie that Ukraine has no Russian schools), take Russian off the airwaves.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @A123, @Beckow

    Almost everyone in Ireland speaks English. It is the necessary language for business-to-business commerce.

     

     

    Trying to compare “Ireland / Northern Ireland” to Ukraine is not productive. Anyone who wants to use Irish Gaelic as a social language in NI is free to do so.
    ____

    There is a much better parallel to the terrorist truck bombing of Ukie-stan extremists.

    PEACE 😇

    • Replies: @songbird
    @A123

    Wonder how many here realize that the official language of South Sudan is English (believe meaning all school instruction there is in English, as of 2007 or so.)

    Did not know it myself until I watched the first episode of YouTuber Indigo Traveller's new series on the country.

    Replies: @German_reader, @Emil Nikola Richard

  89. @Matra
    @German_reader

    I can't recall the details but the former Estonian President, who is one of the most obnoxious former leaders on earth, recently suggested that once the war is over Ukraine should consider ditching Cyrillic script for Latin. He cited Ataturk getting rid of Arabic script as an example to follow. I know most Ukrainians embrace a Western identity these days but I'd be surprised if Ukrainian language speakers were willing to go that far but who knows. Maybe AP would have insight on such a possibility.

    Replies: @German_reader, @AP, @LatW

    I can’t recall the details but the former Estonian President, who is one of the most obnoxious former leaders on earth, recently suggested that once the war is over Ukraine should consider ditching Cyrillic script for Latin.

    That’s not for him to meddle with (if he really said that), so he should stay quiet about it.

  90. @Pixo
    @Mikhail

    That’s a good and balanced article.

    Russia has already been defeated, its reputation, influence in the West, economy and military have been permanently damaged.

    As much as I am on the side of Ukraine, it isn’t comfortable to be on the same side as the MIC Russia-haters.

    Now seems a good time for us to be a gracious winner and negotiate something reasonable.

    Replies: @LatW, @Mikhail

    Now seems a good time for us to be a gracious winner and negotiate something reasonable.

    Those who are doing the actual physical fighting will be doing the negotiating. Those who helped can have a say but only with close alignment with the one who’s doing the fighting and dying.

    And that includes the Russian Volunteer Corps and the Legion Freedom of Russia.

  91. Think it was S who mentioned “Deliverance” in the last thread.

    Haven’t seen it or read the book. Nor would I want to, but what I think is noteworthy about it: the author was born and bred in Georgia (novel takes place in rural Georgia) – but in Atlanta.

    [MORE]

    Just like Margaret Mitchell who wrote “Gone with the Wind.”

    So, it seems to me that, at some time, between her novel and his, these regional rivalries were consolidated or co-opted into a nationwide urban vs. rural dynamic.

    Also, he was the US Poet Laureate before he wrote the novel (his first, so he was groomed by the elites), and, after he wrote it, he was given some then new-fangled award called the “Order of the South” (which I am sure was designed for poz)

  92. @AP
    @German_reader


    “A lot” doesn’t mean all, and there’s a difference between people doing it on their own accord and a high official implying it should be a kind of political programme
     
    If enough voters demand it, it will happen.

    . It’s also incompatible with Ukraine’s alleged European aspirations, but since the EU will probably founder on this crisis
     
    As I've explained to Beckow in earlier discussions, both France and the Baltics have such policies. In Ukraine's case it would be both anti-colonial which the Left wouldn't object to, and nationalist/nativist which the Right wouldn't object to.

    Replies: @LatW

    We might want to think about how Russian will be used for diplomatic purposes. There will be a need to communicate with everyone, not just Russians (but also Kazakhs, Caucasians, diaspora Russophones, etc).

    To all who used to call Ukraine fake and gay – why do you care about language when those who supported this invasion (or did not oppose it properly) kept saying that “they are one people”? If they are one people, then who cares if they speak Ukrainian or Russian – it is, after all, one language, according to them.

    Don’t dig a grave for another, you might yourself fall in it, as the saying goes.

  93. @A123
    @Wokechoke

    Zemmour in France, eliminating MENA origin migration, would have been a glorious thing.

    The problem with Zelensky is not his parentage. It his allegiance to the European WEF. Indigenous Palestinian Jews (such as Likud members) are very annoyed at Zelensky.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Yevardian

    Zemmour is an Algerian Jew you cretin.

    • Replies: @A123
    @Yevardian

    Zemmour wanted to deal with Muslim immigration you pathetic troll.

    Why do violent Jihadists, such as yourself, always try to draw attention away the TRUTH? (1)


    French officials want to sweep the shocking murder of 12-year-old Lola under the rug to hide their own failed migration policy, said Marion Maréchal, vice-president of France’s right-wing Reconquest party, during an interview on BFMTV. She said that despite so many deaths at the hands of migrants in France, the country’s political class is still attempting to stifle any dissent on the topic.

    “I think that beyond the case in question, the death of Lola is our collective responsibility. This isn’t a random event, nor is it just an isolated case. It is a social phenomenon that is threatening us all. I will be a bit direct, but how many liters of blood will it take to have the right to speak? (…) Lola is not an isolated case,” said Maréchal.

    ...

    The brutal rape and murder of the French schoolgirl Lola — by an illegal Algerian migrant who was supposed to have already been deported — has led to an explosion in debate about the devastating impact of mass migration on French society and the country’s security. Critics of French President Emmanuel Macron are accusing his left-liberal government of being largely responsible for the young girl’s death.
     
    Zemmour would defend French children from SJW Islamic sexually deviance. He would want all of them sent home before more 12 year olds die in the name of your Muhammad, the Blood Prophet.

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://rmx.news/france/how-many-liters-of-blood-will-it-take-to-have-the-right-to-speak-french-politician-says-the-murder-of-12-year-old-lola-is-being-swept-under-the-rug/

    Replies: @Wokechoke

  94. @A123
    @AP

    Almost everyone in Ireland speaks English. It is the necessary language for business-to-business commerce.

     
    https://thelanguagenerds.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/English_speakers_Europe.png
     

    Trying to compare "Ireland / Northern Ireland" to Ukraine is not productive. Anyone who wants to use Irish Gaelic as a social language in NI is free to do so.
    ____

    There is a much better parallel to the terrorist truck bombing of Ukie-stan extremists.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @songbird

    Wonder how many here realize that the official language of South Sudan is English (believe meaning all school instruction there is in English, as of 2007 or so.)

    Did not know it myself until I watched the first episode of YouTuber Indigo Traveller’s new series on the country.

    • Replies: @German_reader
    @songbird

    The wikipedia page on religion in South Sudan is confusing:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Sudan#Religion
    Doesn't sound like any reliable data is available.
    They've also applied to join the Commonwealth. A new source of strength for Global Britain.

    Replies: @songbird, @A123

    , @Emil Nikola Richard
    @songbird

    They want to be Hollywood movie stars.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M6-fSbcFGcs

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/29/General_Gordon%27s_Last_Stand.jpg

    Replies: @Wokechoke

  95. @Yevardian
    @A123

    Zemmour is an Algerian Jew you cretin.

    Replies: @A123

    Zemmour wanted to deal with Muslim immigration you pathetic troll.

    Why do violent Jihadists, such as yourself, always try to draw attention away the TRUTH? (1)

    French officials want to sweep the shocking murder of 12-year-old Lola under the rug to hide their own failed migration policy, said Marion Maréchal, vice-president of France’s right-wing Reconquest party, during an interview on BFMTV. She said that despite so many deaths at the hands of migrants in France, the country’s political class is still attempting to stifle any dissent on the topic.

    “I think that beyond the case in question, the death of Lola is our collective responsibility. This isn’t a random event, nor is it just an isolated case. It is a social phenomenon that is threatening us all. I will be a bit direct, but how many liters of blood will it take to have the right to speak? (…) Lola is not an isolated case,” said Maréchal.

    The brutal rape and murder of the French schoolgirl Lola — by an illegal Algerian migrant who was supposed to have already been deported — has led to an explosion in debate about the devastating impact of mass migration on French society and the country’s security. Critics of French President Emmanuel Macron are accusing his left-liberal government of being largely responsible for the young girl’s death.

    Zemmour would defend French children from SJW Islamic sexually deviance. He would want all of them sent home before more 12 year olds die in the name of your Muhammad, the Blood Prophet.

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://rmx.news/france/how-many-liters-of-blood-will-it-take-to-have-the-right-to-speak-french-politician-says-the-murder-of-12-year-old-lola-is-being-swept-under-the-rug/

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @A123

    He'd have done nothing.

    Replies: @A123

  96. @A123
    @Yevardian

    Zemmour wanted to deal with Muslim immigration you pathetic troll.

    Why do violent Jihadists, such as yourself, always try to draw attention away the TRUTH? (1)


    French officials want to sweep the shocking murder of 12-year-old Lola under the rug to hide their own failed migration policy, said Marion Maréchal, vice-president of France’s right-wing Reconquest party, during an interview on BFMTV. She said that despite so many deaths at the hands of migrants in France, the country’s political class is still attempting to stifle any dissent on the topic.

    “I think that beyond the case in question, the death of Lola is our collective responsibility. This isn’t a random event, nor is it just an isolated case. It is a social phenomenon that is threatening us all. I will be a bit direct, but how many liters of blood will it take to have the right to speak? (…) Lola is not an isolated case,” said Maréchal.

    ...

    The brutal rape and murder of the French schoolgirl Lola — by an illegal Algerian migrant who was supposed to have already been deported — has led to an explosion in debate about the devastating impact of mass migration on French society and the country’s security. Critics of French President Emmanuel Macron are accusing his left-liberal government of being largely responsible for the young girl’s death.
     
    Zemmour would defend French children from SJW Islamic sexually deviance. He would want all of them sent home before more 12 year olds die in the name of your Muhammad, the Blood Prophet.

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://rmx.news/france/how-many-liters-of-blood-will-it-take-to-have-the-right-to-speak-french-politician-says-the-murder-of-12-year-old-lola-is-being-swept-under-the-rug/

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    He’d have done nothing.

    • Replies: @A123
    @Wokechoke


    WC: A Jewish head of state in Europe is an evil thing. End of story. I know you are not allowed to say such things in Germany but the evidence is in

    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-200/#comment-5617740

     


    Zemmour wanted to deal with Muslim immigration
     
    WC: He’d have done nothing.

    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-200/#comment-5617985

     

    So "Joooozzzzz" have no power? Zemmour could not have done anything? That seems weak (not evil).

    There seems to be an inconsistency with your logic surrounding the "Joooozzzzz".

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @Wokechoke

  97. @songbird
    @A123

    Wonder how many here realize that the official language of South Sudan is English (believe meaning all school instruction there is in English, as of 2007 or so.)

    Did not know it myself until I watched the first episode of YouTuber Indigo Traveller's new series on the country.

    Replies: @German_reader, @Emil Nikola Richard

    The wikipedia page on religion in South Sudan is confusing:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Sudan#Religion
    Doesn’t sound like any reliable data is available.
    They’ve also applied to join the Commonwealth. A new source of strength for Global Britain.

    • Replies: @songbird
    @German_reader

    Censuses are political dynamite in Africa.

    Didn't realize it, until I read "The Africans" by David Lamb. Thought it was just a state capacity issue. (Which would be embarrassing, as the US had a census in 1790) Though, partly it is a technical issue - it is an impossible challenge to get around different tribes fudging their own numbers for political gains. Harder still to prevent them from warring when the new numbers are released.

    IMO, this is why the theory that they'll stop taking censuses in the UK soon is very believable.

    I can see some of it myself, when accidentally seeing adverts for the US census. It is an obvious tool for promoting wealth and power transfer. The advertisements are pretty naked about it.

    Replies: @German_reader

    , @A123
    @German_reader

    I believe this is what you are looking for.


    Religions
    Christian 60.5%, folk religion 32.9%, Muslim 6.2%, other <1%, unaffiliated <1% (2020 est.)

    https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/south-sudan/#people-and-society
     
    South Sudan (Christian) separated from Sudan (Muslim). In short form, the oil is under Christian land, yet the Muslim population was reaping near 100% of the benefit. The breakup in 2011 was intended to cure this problem.

    English is the official language of South Sudan. Thus it predominates in schools, government, and business. However, illiteracy is quite common.

    PEACE 😇
  98. @songbird
    @A123

    Wonder how many here realize that the official language of South Sudan is English (believe meaning all school instruction there is in English, as of 2007 or so.)

    Did not know it myself until I watched the first episode of YouTuber Indigo Traveller's new series on the country.

    Replies: @German_reader, @Emil Nikola Richard

    They want to be Hollywood movie stars.

    • LOL: songbird
    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @Emil Nikola Richard

    Chinese Heston sits at the right hand of God...while Lawrence Olivier sat at the left hand of Noel Coward.

  99. @Emil Nikola Richard
    @songbird

    They want to be Hollywood movie stars.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M6-fSbcFGcs

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/29/General_Gordon%27s_Last_Stand.jpg

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    Chinese Heston sits at the right hand of God…while Lawrence Olivier sat at the left hand of Noel Coward.

  100. @German_reader
    @songbird

    The wikipedia page on religion in South Sudan is confusing:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Sudan#Religion
    Doesn't sound like any reliable data is available.
    They've also applied to join the Commonwealth. A new source of strength for Global Britain.

    Replies: @songbird, @A123

    Censuses are political dynamite in Africa.

    Didn’t realize it, until I read “The Africans” by David Lamb. Thought it was just a state capacity issue. (Which would be embarrassing, as the US had a census in 1790) Though, partly it is a technical issue – it is an impossible challenge to get around different tribes fudging their own numbers for political gains. Harder still to prevent them from warring when the new numbers are released.

    IMO, this is why the theory that they’ll stop taking censuses in the UK soon is very believable.

    I can see some of it myself, when accidentally seeing adverts for the US census. It is an obvious tool for promoting wealth and power transfer. The advertisements are pretty naked about it.

    • Replies: @German_reader
    @songbird


    IMO, this is why the theory that they’ll stop taking censuses in the UK soon is very believable.
     
    Isn't that what happened in Lebanon? iirc the last census there was in the 1940s, everybody knows that there have been massive demographic shifts since then, but the issue is just too politically explosive. Though I guess the political incentives in Britain might be rather different.
    There was another horror crime committed by one of Merkel's million recently btw, which I might just as well mention, if only as a change from the relentless talk about Ukraine. A Somali who came in 2015 attacked two 20- and 35-year old painters on a street in Ludwigshafen-Oggersheim and more or less butchered them with a large kitchen knife. He cut off the lower arm of one of them and threw it on the balcony of his ex-girlfriend. Then he walked to a nearby drug store and stabbed a customer (who survived) there before being shot (non-lethally) by police.
    Motive is still unclear, probably uncontrolled rage, so far it seems the victims were selected randomly. Maybe he wanted to scare his ex-girlfriend and thought he might just as well kill some pedestrians, dismember them and use their body parts as a power move. Incidentally, Oggersheim is where Helmut Kohl was from, I guess one could discern some deeper symbolism here.
    Anyway, I remember a comment by reiner tor from a few years ago where he basically wrote that he envied people living in 1957, because nowadays it seems like we're either heading towards a spectacularly stupid world war, or to a spectacularly stupid end through immigration apocalypse. Events since then certainly haven't disproven that assessment.

    Replies: @Sean

  101. German_reader says:
    @songbird
    @German_reader

    Censuses are political dynamite in Africa.

    Didn't realize it, until I read "The Africans" by David Lamb. Thought it was just a state capacity issue. (Which would be embarrassing, as the US had a census in 1790) Though, partly it is a technical issue - it is an impossible challenge to get around different tribes fudging their own numbers for political gains. Harder still to prevent them from warring when the new numbers are released.

    IMO, this is why the theory that they'll stop taking censuses in the UK soon is very believable.

    I can see some of it myself, when accidentally seeing adverts for the US census. It is an obvious tool for promoting wealth and power transfer. The advertisements are pretty naked about it.

    Replies: @German_reader

    IMO, this is why the theory that they’ll stop taking censuses in the UK soon is very believable.

    Isn’t that what happened in Lebanon? iirc the last census there was in the 1940s, everybody knows that there have been massive demographic shifts since then, but the issue is just too politically explosive. Though I guess the political incentives in Britain might be rather different.
    There was another horror crime committed by one of Merkel’s million recently btw, which I might just as well mention, if only as a change from the relentless talk about Ukraine. A Somali who came in 2015 attacked two 20- and 35-year old painters on a street in Ludwigshafen-Oggersheim and more or less butchered them with a large kitchen knife. He cut off the lower arm of one of them and threw it on the balcony of his ex-girlfriend. Then he walked to a nearby drug store and stabbed a customer (who survived) there before being shot (non-lethally) by police.
    Motive is still unclear, probably uncontrolled rage, so far it seems the victims were selected randomly. Maybe he wanted to scare his ex-girlfriend and thought he might just as well kill some pedestrians, dismember them and use their body parts as a power move. Incidentally, Oggersheim is where Helmut Kohl was from, I guess one could discern some deeper symbolism here.
    Anyway, I remember a comment by reiner tor from a few years ago where he basically wrote that he envied people living in 1957, because nowadays it seems like we’re either heading towards a spectacularly stupid world war, or to a spectacularly stupid end through immigration apocalypse. Events since then certainly haven’t disproven that assessment.

    • Thanks: songbird
    • Replies: @Sean
    @German_reader

    The first census in Saudi Arabia showed it had too few people for the the Kings's liking, so he ordered the population figure to be doubled before it was released. The deception has been continued. There are several million more people in Britain than its governments know or want to know.

    Britain's financial situation is actual comparatively good, the UK has a much smaller deficit and total debt that any comparable country apart from Germany. It suits Sunak to give the impression that Britain is in ongoing terrible trouble, so he goets the credit but the Truss freefall of the pound and claims that pensions would soon be worthless/ mortgages would double at the same time as heating bills would triple, but it was an artificial crisis manufactured by the Bank Of England publicly announcing hey would stop supporting the pound and even specifying the date; they did it to get rid of her black ex she put in charge of the economy, and her too.

    Once there was a new Chancellor and then PM they delayed the Budget so they would not be working with the worst case assumptions, and the markets did not utter a word of criticism; this silence showed it was a pseudo crisis.

    Long term lowering growth is a problem for the UK but a means of boosting it is always available to Britain by importing more people, which also pumps up the housing market. Those two things are all economists and the government respectively want to do-- timed so the boost comes before an election. The price of wholesale energy has fallen by a third since August so the price cap will likely not be activated. Sunak is going to to made to seem like a genius in a few months.


    It is alarming that Sunak understood that Truss's ideas simply would not fly in Britain, and many non immigrant Conservatives did not understand that. So the immigrant psychos are worse, but the immigrant elite are--sad to say--maybe better.

  102. @Wokechoke
    @Yevardian

    Ukies worship antitank guns and proffer sainthood upon them. I suspect there will be sects who bow before Drones.

    Replies: @LatW, @Mikhail

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @Mikhail

    There will be Uniate Javelinism and Orthodox Greek Bayractarites. The Green Tshirt Heretics and the
    Ecumenical Council of Nikolaev FOABites.

    , @Yevardian
    @Mikhail

    Not fundamentally different from Putin annexing in referendae several oblasts of which they don't even control half of.

    As I've been saying from the beginning of this war, Russia and Ukraine remain cultural mirror images of each other. The only difference are their respective geopolitical situations since 1991. Magically swap Ukrainians with Russians in their territories and the identical things would be happening. The fact that the fighting has almost entirely been in the ethnic Russian part of Ukraine says as much.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @Mikhail

  103. @Mr. Hack

    Is your pro-Ukrainian activism not enough
     
    As long as your over the top hysterics about supporting Ukraine remains at a boiling point, my Ukrainian activism will remain intact. I also graduated from college at a time of a long recession and couldn't find "meaningful" work and had to settle for restaurant type work, so my post about this topic is not devoid of sensitivity. But what can you do? Nowadays it's well known that a degree in liberal arts is not necessarily an open door to a high paying job or career. In my day, believe it or not, this wasn't the case. Nobody ever promised you that life would be a rose garden, sometimes you have to make due with what's being offered.

    Replies: @German_reader, @Mikhail

    • Thanks: Mr. Hack
  104. @Pixo
    @Mikhail

    That’s a good and balanced article.

    Russia has already been defeated, its reputation, influence in the West, economy and military have been permanently damaged.

    As much as I am on the side of Ukraine, it isn’t comfortable to be on the same side as the MIC Russia-haters.

    Now seems a good time for us to be a gracious winner and negotiate something reasonable.

    Replies: @LatW, @Mikhail

    That’s a good and balanced article.

    Russia has already been defeated, its reputation, influence in the West, economy and military have been permanently damaged.

    As much as I am on the side of Ukraine, it isn’t comfortable to be on the same side as the MIC Russia-haters.

    Now seems a good time for us to be a gracious winner and negotiate something reasonable.

    The replies I posted to that article are good and balanced. Russia isn’t losing and will not lose.

  105. @Mikhail
    @Wokechoke

    https://twitter.com/RWApodcast/status/1583812274481135617

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Yevardian

    There will be Uniate Javelinism and Orthodox Greek Bayractarites. The Green Tshirt Heretics and the
    Ecumenical Council of Nikolaev FOABites.

    • LOL: Mikhail
  106. @Mr. Hack
    @German_reader

    You've got to admit that the imagery is wonderful. Reminds me of the stuff Karlin used to paste here to great aplomb:

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FfqtSuRXEAIf6hq?format=jpg&name=large

    Remember, the good old days?:

    https://www.unz.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/na-korable-polden.jpg

    Replies: @German_reader, @Mikhail

  107. @Barbarossa
    @sher singh



    “I don’t let any dieties control my life”
     
    Hey, I don't let any dieties control my life either, I eat whatever I please!

    Replies: @sher singh

    Wrong man to have that convo with.
    You don’t eat dogs, cats, snakes or horses.

    Your preferences are shaped by those who took your foreskin||
    Aryans have Maryada – a clear code – it’ll please you to save your life in the interest of cow protection||

    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ

    • Replies: @Barbarossa
    @sher singh

    It was just a throw away pun you know. I couldn't resist that deities was spelled dieties.

    Hanging with too many poop stirrers and retards at the Discord seems to have made you a little uptight. It sounds like an unbelievable idiotic time over there. Thanks for reporting on it so we don't have to find out personally!


    Your preferences are shaped by those who took your foreskin

     

    Celts have been eating cattle and pork long before any circumcision. Don't worry though, I don't believe in circumcision myself anyhow and have butcher dates in the next couple of weeks for a pair of oinkers and a troublesome bull calf.

    But we've covered that ground already and will have to agree to disagree!

    Replies: @Sher Singh

  108. @Yevardian
    @sher singh

    I remember this "viper" saying that's just what to expect from the discord platform, not even a reflection on the "Kesslerisation appreciator" himself.

    Btw, I guess you heard of this, but I was rereading Herodotos a while back and noticed his description of Scythians worshipping swords. You're still a pajeet though, sir.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @sher singh

    Water under the bridge, Rajputs are Huns.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alchon_Huns

    You’re not Greek or Iranian & like Germans will cease to exist in a century.
    Wokechoke ignores that Weapons are worshipped in general – not as idols.

    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ

    • Replies: @Yevardian
    @sher singh


    You’re not Greek or Iranian
     
    ?

    & like Germans will cease to exist in a century.
     
    Germany will always be a 50x better place to live than anywhere in India whatever its future ethnic mixture is. I notice you don't live there.
    Well, there's been a successful Armenian diaspora independent of national state since Kilikian Armenia fell in 14th century. It's not as if the Singh's have country of their own, as I remember the Khalistan insurrection at the Golden Temple didn't go very well.

    Replies: @sher singh

  109. sher singh says:
    @AP
    @Matra


    I’m noticing a drop in sympathy from Western Europeans who communicate online in English and French for these supposedly based Central/Eastern European countries like Poland.
     
    A combination of the phenomenon of useful-for-Russia idiots who see a savior in Putin and therefore hatred for his enemies, and resentment of peoples who are superior to them and highlight their own faults. Peoples who actually fight for their homelands rather than invite in invaders who displace them, peoples who demand money rather than give it to those who replace them in their own lands, peoples who retain a high level of physical beauty that has been fading among the Westerners, etc.

    In other news nearly 630k Ukrainians have applied for temporary resident status – in Canada
     
    I'd guess most of the ones in Germany and Poland will return (my own have come back in summer to central Ukraine from the Rhineland where they went in March when Russians were threatening Kiev and Zhytomir) but most of the ones in North America will stay: it is further away and more difficult to come back. Though by no means will they all stay, many husbands and brothers have remained in Ukraine so there is a reason to return.

    Be careful, it will take longer for Canada to become an Indian-Chinese homeland (Singapore North) where Anglo servants kowtow before their new Chinese and Hindu elites, with all of those young Eastern Europeans refugees boosting the European population.

    Replies: @sher singh, @Dmitry

    Be careful, it will take longer for Canada to become an Indian-Chinese homeland (Singapore North) where Anglo servants kowtow before their new Chinese and Hindu elites, with all of those young Eastern Europeans refugees boosting the European population.

    6 lakh is about a year’s immigration. 20 Lakh with family unification is like 3..
    Ukr also suck at subtlety – their hate crimes/RW terrorism further the narrative.

    The avg White sees Ukraine getting billions while Syria or w/e gets nothing.
    They can sleep for 20 years knowing Whites matter more even as a multicultural minority.

    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ

  110. The longer the Russian invasion of Ukraine continues, the more ashamed
    I feel of being white. But then the Russians (and the Germans) have been
    an embarrassment to white people for many centuries now, mostly due
    to their tendency to hyperviolence and irrationality.

    Martin Luther invented a new religion by saying, “Sin boldly!”
    Can you imagine Jesus saying something like this? Whatever
    religion Luther invented, it wasn’t Christianity. From that point
    on, German ideologies became more and more psychotic –
    Marxism, Nietzscheanism, Nazism, Freudianism (although that’s
    mostly Jewish), as in the phrase, “Neurotics build castles in the air, and
    the psychotics move in.” More to the point, the psychotic visions
    of reality provided the Germans with a rationalization of their
    proclivity for hyperviolence. Look at the murder rates by Germans
    during 1900 – 1945. First a minor genocide in southwest Africa,
    then WW I and WW II where the murder and killing rates
    (because if you’re dead, it makes no difference to you whether
    you were killed or murdered) reached stratospheric levels.
    During 1900-45 Germany became effectively a nation of murderers.
    At the end of WW II the victors concluded that the Germans
    are too primitive to rule themselves and in due time will
    produce another Hitler. Therefore, for the sake of peace
    in Europe, Germany has been reduced to a nonentity, and
    the Germans kept on a short leash.

    Today we have a similar situation with Russia. The Russians
    are clearly too primitive to rule themselves, and have produced
    a number of tyrants – Lenin, Stalin, and now Putin. Just as in
    Germany, Christianity has had no effect on Russian behavior.
    Germans and Russians are the most anti-Christian peoples
    in Europe.Jesus said, “Love thy neighbor.” I don’t recall Him
    ever saying, “Invade thy neighbor.” Hence for the sake of peace
    in Europe, it appears that the rational course of action is to
    reduce Russia to a nonentity (through attrition?) or a local
    power, and to keep Russians on a short leash.Of course, easier
    said than done. Russia is a little bigger than Germany. But at
    the very least, no alliance between Germany and Russia should
    be allowed to take place, which has indeed been standard
    American and British policy for decades.

    • LOL: sher singh
    • Troll: Yevardian
    • Replies: @German_reader
    @Anon 2

    I've heard from reliable sources that soon there'll be a settlement of the heirless property issue which will involve much of Warsaw's housing stock being given to Jewish organizations. The NYC-based company which will administer it apparently already has plans for massive increases in rent and for building several mega-brothels which will cater to Israeli tourists.
    There are also plans for making Ukrainian an official language in Poland that has equal status with Polish. School curricula will be adapted to focus on the dark legacy of Polish colonialism and on Bandera's fight for freedom (to be celebrated by regular marches involving brandishing of farm utensils).

    Replies: @A123, @Wokechoke

  111. @Mikhail
    @Wokechoke

    https://twitter.com/RWApodcast/status/1583812274481135617

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Yevardian

    Not fundamentally different from Putin annexing in referendae several oblasts of which they don’t even control half of.

    As I’ve been saying from the beginning of this war, Russia and Ukraine remain cultural mirror images of each other. The only difference are their respective geopolitical situations since 1991. Magically swap Ukrainians with Russians in their territories and the identical things would be happening. The fact that the fighting has almost entirely been in the ethnic Russian part of Ukraine says as much.

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @Yevardian


    The fact that the fighting has almost entirely been in the ethnic Russian part of Ukraine says as much.
     
    And the fact that Putler has decided to go full psycho in Eastern Ukraine and bomb civilian enclaves because his regular armed forces are doing such a lousy job there, will ultimately severe any real comradery between Russified Ukrainians and Russians. In some really concrete ways, old Putler has managed to quickly coalesce strong feelings of oneness and nationality amongst all Ukrainians, east - west, north - south.
    , @Mikhail
    @Yevardian

    Some similarity. The Russian side is nonetheless the one with a more reality based claim that includes not seeking cancel culture stances much unlike the Kiev regime.

    Awhile back, I recall someone saying that Ukraine in actuality is a more extreme version of how Russia is negatively portrayed.

    Replies: @AnonfromTN

  112. @sher singh
    @Yevardian

    Water under the bridge, Rajputs are Huns.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alchon_Huns

    You're not Greek or Iranian & like Germans will cease to exist in a century.
    Wokechoke ignores that Weapons are worshipped in general - not as idols.

    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ

    Replies: @Yevardian

    You’re not Greek or Iranian

    ?

    & like Germans will cease to exist in a century.

    Germany will always be a 50x better place to live than anywhere in India whatever its future ethnic mixture is. I notice you don’t live there.
    Well, there’s been a successful Armenian diaspora independent of national state since Kilikian Armenia fell in 14th century. It’s not as if the Singh’s have country of their own, as I remember the Khalistan insurrection at the Golden Temple didn’t go very well.

    • Replies: @sher singh
    @Yevardian

    You’re not Greek or Iranian - you're random mountain residue betwixt Empires.
    Khalistan insurrection at the Golden Temple didn’t go well. - A Company of Singhs killed a Btn of Infantry.

    There was also the siege of Delhi last year - talking is all Armenians can do.

    I notice you don’t live there. - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anandpur_Sahib

    You have an Anglo surname & are unarmed - on top of that you're a christcuck.
    A living meme up till the white man your sister married, go rope.

    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ

  113. @Wokechoke
    @A123

    He'd have done nothing.

    Replies: @A123

    WC: A Jewish head of state in Europe is an evil thing. End of story. I know you are not allowed to say such things in Germany but the evidence is in

    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-200/#comment-5617740

    Zemmour wanted to deal with Muslim immigration

    WC: He’d have done nothing.

    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-200/#comment-5617985

    So “Joooozzzzz” have no power? Zemmour could not have done anything? That seems weak (not evil).

    There seems to be an inconsistency with your logic surrounding the “Joooozzzzz”.

    PEACE 😇

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @A123

    Why would he block Arab migration to France? Even if he said wished to stop it, he was only pulling the Gallic Leg.

    Replies: @A123

  114. @German_reader
    @songbird

    The wikipedia page on religion in South Sudan is confusing:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Sudan#Religion
    Doesn't sound like any reliable data is available.
    They've also applied to join the Commonwealth. A new source of strength for Global Britain.

    Replies: @songbird, @A123

    I believe this is what you are looking for.

    Religions
    Christian 60.5%, folk religion 32.9%, Muslim 6.2%, other <1%, unaffiliated <1% (2020 est.)

    https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/south-sudan/#people-and-society

    South Sudan (Christian) separated from Sudan (Muslim). In short form, the oil is under Christian land, yet the Muslim population was reaping near 100% of the benefit. The breakup in 2011 was intended to cure this problem.

    English is the official language of South Sudan. Thus it predominates in schools, government, and business. However, illiteracy is quite common.

    PEACE 😇

  115. @Yevardian
    @Mikhail

    Not fundamentally different from Putin annexing in referendae several oblasts of which they don't even control half of.

    As I've been saying from the beginning of this war, Russia and Ukraine remain cultural mirror images of each other. The only difference are their respective geopolitical situations since 1991. Magically swap Ukrainians with Russians in their territories and the identical things would be happening. The fact that the fighting has almost entirely been in the ethnic Russian part of Ukraine says as much.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @Mikhail

    The fact that the fighting has almost entirely been in the ethnic Russian part of Ukraine says as much.

    And the fact that Putler has decided to go full psycho in Eastern Ukraine and bomb civilian enclaves because his regular armed forces are doing such a lousy job there, will ultimately severe any real comradery between Russified Ukrainians and Russians. In some really concrete ways, old Putler has managed to quickly coalesce strong feelings of oneness and nationality amongst all Ukrainians, east – west, north – south.

  116. @AP
    @Beckow


    That’s is counter-intuitive and unnatural.
     
    Nonsense. If Gaelic weren't so hard probably a lot of English-speaking Irish people in a conflict zone like Northern Ireland would try to do the same. But these Russian-speakers already can speak and understand Ukrainian, they just use Russian more often because it is easier for them.

    If you believe it, you need to meet some real people from there
     
    I literally know such people who are in Ukraine. And some friends from Moscow have Ukrainian relatives like that, the Muscovites are amazed when they talk about it. Almost all Ukrainians are bilingual, the Russians-speakers are simply those for whom Russian comes a little easier. Many of them are deciding they will now, as a principle, try to get used to speaking Ukrainian only. I don't pretend to know what percentage of Russian-speakers in Ukraine think like this, but it must be a significant one because I've seen the sentiment expressed by various people in Ukraine who are not related to each other.

    I do all the time, and we talk – always in Russian no matter where they are from in Ukraine –
     
    Would you be capable of speaking Ukrainian with them? Is their English better than their Russian? Otherwise, what other language would they speak with you?

    and they have never expressed that sentiment.
     
    Well, either it has not come up, or your well-established reputation for dishonesty is at work again.

    You should ask what they think of it, not that I would expect an honest report back from you. Though if they left early in the war and haven't been bombed they might not be as zealous as those in Ukraine.

    Language is a very sticky thing to abandon, especially a highly cultured language like Russian that generations grew up with. It is simply not going to happen because things like that don’t happen
     
    The Russian-speakers of Lviv mostly abandoned that language already. Even the ethnic Russian minority in that city is mostly Ukrainian-speaking now, at least the ones who grew up after independence (people under 35). Kiev has seen a slow increase in Ukrainian before the Russian invasion. This will now accelerate.

    In Ukraine's case it is mostly ethnic Ukrainian Russian-speakers deciding that they will quit that language. It is too early to tell if they stick to it, or course. They might backtrack if the war ends and emotions settle down (how many people promise to go to the gym at New Year's but slack of after a few months?). But policies can stay longer. They might get rid of the Russian primary schools too (why not? Russians pretend such schools don't exist anyways when they lie that Ukraine has no Russian schools), take Russian off the airwaves.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @A123, @Beckow

    Your ‘analysis‘ is roughly on a level of a 12-year old, a total disconnect from reality. I and others explained to you why Russians in Ukraine without Russian language will not happen – and should not. Check out the current EU rules on minorities and not the quasi-fascist Balts or France from 3 generations ago.

    But you don’t respond rationally. Instead you are back to your screaming baby fit: “lies!” If you cannot even understand basic verbal categories, e.g. opinions and projections of what may happen cannot by “lies!”, what are you doing on this forum?

    I wish you luck, but you are way over you head. Maybe the poor education caught up with you – or possibly you don’t understand critical thinking.

    • Replies: @AP
    @Beckow


    Check out the current EU rules on minorities and not the quasi-fascist Balts or France from 3 generations ago.

     

    Why do you whine when caught lying as usual?

    Current French language policy, not “3 generations ago”:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Language_policy_in_France

    “France has one official language, the French language. The French government does not regulate the choice of language in publications by individuals, but the use of French is required by law in commercial and workplace
    communications”

    :::::::::::::::::::::

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breton_language

    “ In the late 20th century, the French government considered incorporating the independent Breton-language immersion schools (called Diwan) into the state education system. This action was blocked by the French Constitutional Council based on the 1994 amendment to the Constitution that establishes French as the language of the republic. Therefore, no other language may be used as a language of instruction in state schools. The Toubon Law implemented the amendment, asserting that French is the language of public education”

    ::::::::::::::::::

    Was 1994 3 generations ago Beckow, or were you just lying again and as usual?

    Whine some more about being called a liar in the same post where you lie as always.

    Replies: @German_reader

  117. @Yevardian
    @Mikhail

    Not fundamentally different from Putin annexing in referendae several oblasts of which they don't even control half of.

    As I've been saying from the beginning of this war, Russia and Ukraine remain cultural mirror images of each other. The only difference are their respective geopolitical situations since 1991. Magically swap Ukrainians with Russians in their territories and the identical things would be happening. The fact that the fighting has almost entirely been in the ethnic Russian part of Ukraine says as much.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @Mikhail

    Some similarity. The Russian side is nonetheless the one with a more reality based claim that includes not seeking cancel culture stances much unlike the Kiev regime.

    Awhile back, I recall someone saying that Ukraine in actuality is a more extreme version of how Russia is negatively portrayed.

    • LOL: Mr. Hack
    • Replies: @AnonfromTN
    @Mikhail

    A vignette from my recent experience

    In Lugansk I saw Ukrainian names of some stores. I pointed to a local that the name of their largest hotel is in Russian on top and in Ukrainian over the entrance. The response was “We are not Ukraine, we are normal”

  118. @Mikhail
    @Yevardian

    Some similarity. The Russian side is nonetheless the one with a more reality based claim that includes not seeking cancel culture stances much unlike the Kiev regime.

    Awhile back, I recall someone saying that Ukraine in actuality is a more extreme version of how Russia is negatively portrayed.

    Replies: @AnonfromTN

    A vignette from my recent experience

    In Lugansk I saw Ukrainian names of some stores. I pointed to a local that the name of their largest hotel is in Russian on top and in Ukrainian over the entrance. The response was “We are not Ukraine, we are normal”

    • Agree: Mikhail
  119. @Beckow
    @AP

    Your 'analysis' is roughly on a level of a 12-year old, a total disconnect from reality. I and others explained to you why Russians in Ukraine without Russian language will not happen - and should not. Check out the current EU rules on minorities and not the quasi-fascist Balts or France from 3 generations ago.

    But you don't respond rationally. Instead you are back to your screaming baby fit: "lies!" If you cannot even understand basic verbal categories, e.g. opinions and projections of what may happen cannot by "lies!", what are you doing on this forum?

    I wish you luck, but you are way over you head. Maybe the poor education caught up with you - or possibly you don't understand critical thinking.

    Replies: @AP

    Check out the current EU rules on minorities and not the quasi-fascist Balts or France from 3 generations ago.

    Why do you whine when caught lying as usual?

    Current French language policy, not “3 generations ago”:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Language_policy_in_France

    “France has one official language, the French language. The French government does not regulate the choice of language in publications by individuals, but the use of French is required by law in commercial and workplace
    communications”

    :::::::::::::::::::::

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breton_language

    “ In the late 20th century, the French government considered incorporating the independent Breton-language immersion schools (called Diwan) into the state education system. This action was blocked by the French Constitutional Council based on the 1994 amendment to the Constitution that establishes French as the language of the republic. Therefore, no other language may be used as a language of instruction in state schools. The Toubon Law implemented the amendment, asserting that French is the language of public education”

    ::::::::::::::::::

    Was 1994 3 generations ago Beckow, or were you just lying again and as usual?

    Whine some more about being called a liar in the same post where you lie as always.

    • Replies: @German_reader
    @AP

    Ukraine is a signatory to this:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Charter_for_Regional_or_Minority_Languages
    imo Ukraine should avoid anything that looks like repression of the Russian language, but it's of course their decision. Don't be surprised though if it costs Ukraine its sympathies among liberals who think Ukraine is fighting for "European values".

    Replies: @LatW, @AnonfromTN

  120. German_reader says:
    @Anon 2
    The longer the Russian invasion of Ukraine continues, the more ashamed
    I feel of being white. But then the Russians (and the Germans) have been
    an embarrassment to white people for many centuries now, mostly due
    to their tendency to hyperviolence and irrationality.

    Martin Luther invented a new religion by saying, “Sin boldly!”
    Can you imagine Jesus saying something like this? Whatever
    religion Luther invented, it wasn’t Christianity. From that point
    on, German ideologies became more and more psychotic -
    Marxism, Nietzscheanism, Nazism, Freudianism (although that’s
    mostly Jewish), as in the phrase, “Neurotics build castles in the air, and
    the psychotics move in.” More to the point, the psychotic visions
    of reality provided the Germans with a rationalization of their
    proclivity for hyperviolence. Look at the murder rates by Germans
    during 1900 - 1945. First a minor genocide in southwest Africa,
    then WW I and WW II where the murder and killing rates
    (because if you’re dead, it makes no difference to you whether
    you were killed or murdered) reached stratospheric levels.
    During 1900-45 Germany became effectively a nation of murderers.
    At the end of WW II the victors concluded that the Germans
    are too primitive to rule themselves and in due time will
    produce another Hitler. Therefore, for the sake of peace
    in Europe, Germany has been reduced to a nonentity, and
    the Germans kept on a short leash.

    Today we have a similar situation with Russia. The Russians
    are clearly too primitive to rule themselves, and have produced
    a number of tyrants - Lenin, Stalin, and now Putin. Just as in
    Germany, Christianity has had no effect on Russian behavior.
    Germans and Russians are the most anti-Christian peoples
    in Europe.Jesus said, “Love thy neighbor.” I don’t recall Him
    ever saying, “Invade thy neighbor.” Hence for the sake of peace
    in Europe, it appears that the rational course of action is to
    reduce Russia to a nonentity (through attrition?) or a local
    power, and to keep Russians on a short leash.Of course, easier
    said than done. Russia is a little bigger than Germany. But at
    the very least, no alliance between Germany and Russia should
    be allowed to take place, which has indeed been standard
    American and British policy for decades.

    Replies: @German_reader

    I’ve heard from reliable sources that soon there’ll be a settlement of the heirless property issue which will involve much of Warsaw’s housing stock being given to Jewish organizations. The NYC-based company which will administer it apparently already has plans for massive increases in rent and for building several mega-brothels which will cater to Israeli tourists.
    There are also plans for making Ukrainian an official language in Poland that has equal status with Polish. School curricula will be adapted to focus on the dark legacy of Polish colonialism and on Bandera’s fight for freedom (to be celebrated by regular marches involving brandishing of farm utensils).

    • Thanks: S
    • LOL: A123
    • Replies: @A123
    @German_reader


    I’ve heard from reliable sources
     
    My reliable sources say that Germany will pay over $1 Trillion in reparations to Poland in the near future.

    heirless property issue which will involve much of Warsaw’s housing stock ... already has plans for massive increases in rent
     
    All significant commercial property was 100% resolved decades ago. Private residential claims have to be adjudicated one-by-one in Polish courts. And, Polish law at most would require cash compensation, they would not change title of owner occupied property.

    Thus, the only real estate in play are explicity religious sites (e.g. synagogues and graveyards) that have been over built. This is a *tiny* amount of acreage.

    Poland will be use a small portion of German reparations to buy out vague Israeli claims, relocate the deceased, etc. Very little land will actually change hands.

    What will Poland do with the rest of the reparations they extract from Germany?

    Jewish organizations. The NYC-based company
     
    Palestinian Jews dislike post-Judaic NYC apostates. Why would real Jews let fake non-Jews take control of anything? This exact scheme was introduced and routed last year.

    Any money would go to management in Israel where Likud and Orthodox politicians would strike a deal over management. NYC Sh!tL!bs will be totally shut out.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @German_reader

    , @Wokechoke
    @German_reader

    When the Jews realize they can make more money from the insurance on the property won they will burn Warsaw down.

  121. German_reader says:
    @AP
    @Beckow


    Check out the current EU rules on minorities and not the quasi-fascist Balts or France from 3 generations ago.

     

    Why do you whine when caught lying as usual?

    Current French language policy, not “3 generations ago”:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Language_policy_in_France

    “France has one official language, the French language. The French government does not regulate the choice of language in publications by individuals, but the use of French is required by law in commercial and workplace
    communications”

    :::::::::::::::::::::

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breton_language

    “ In the late 20th century, the French government considered incorporating the independent Breton-language immersion schools (called Diwan) into the state education system. This action was blocked by the French Constitutional Council based on the 1994 amendment to the Constitution that establishes French as the language of the republic. Therefore, no other language may be used as a language of instruction in state schools. The Toubon Law implemented the amendment, asserting that French is the language of public education”

    ::::::::::::::::::

    Was 1994 3 generations ago Beckow, or were you just lying again and as usual?

    Whine some more about being called a liar in the same post where you lie as always.

    Replies: @German_reader

    Ukraine is a signatory to this:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Charter_for_Regional_or_Minority_Languages
    imo Ukraine should avoid anything that looks like repression of the Russian language, but it’s of course their decision. Don’t be surprised though if it costs Ukraine its sympathies among liberals who think Ukraine is fighting for “European values”.

    • Replies: @LatW
    @German_reader


    Ukraine is a signatory to this:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Charter_for_Regional_or_Minority_Language
     
    This Charter is under the auspices of the European Council and that is a separate organization from the European Commission and a separate set of laws from the acquis communautaire.

    Of course, traditionally, the European Council has been closely consulted.

    However, we must keep in mind two things. Ukraine ratified this treaty in 2005, in good spirit, when Ukraine had no idea it would be attacked by its neighbor (well, some nationalists knew it was coming, but they were too few and were ignored). I know that this treaty is meant to protect the minorities first and foremost, and not to protect from an aggressive neighbor (one of the owners of the protected languages), however, this can be considered an unusual situation where the speakers of that language are used as the fifth column to destabilize the state. These treaties should no longer be viewed in abstract, but should take into account the changing international background. The point of this type of legislation should be to protect in a new, more civilized European space and not to be used as an instrument in neo-colonial wars.

    Second, this is a very dire and dramatic situation that we practically haven't experienced since the 1940s (the aim was to destroy Ukraine as a country). A lot can be reconsidered, a lot of treaties revisited both in Europe & Ukraine and in Russia. Russia has stepped out of some of her liabilities as well (afaik, Russia stepped out of some war crimes related obligations and if Russia isolates further, could potentially exit more treaties). We will have to review a lot of things to figure out how we are going to live with Russia on our doorstep in the future.

    I'm not saying that Ukraine should exit this treaty, but it is no longer 2004 or even 2014 and the above has to be taken into consideration when discussing any type of international minority related obligations to ever be put on Ukraine. It most likely will be taken into consideration in the future conversations with the EU. Especially in the light of the recent drone attacks, where a pregnant woman was killed and similar atrocities committed, Ukraine is likely to get leeway.

    You must also understand one basic thing. Language is not the main issue there but loyalty. Many Russophones are not only loyal, but are among the fiercest fighters for Ukraine. In the future, they need to create an environment that works for them, not because Europe said so. So that they can cohabit normally again. It is up to them to figure it out.

    Language is only an issue so far that their linguistic situation created a fifth column. This is what they want to avert now. Because Russia has openly said - whenever there is at least one Russian speaker, we can go in and destroy that country. It's backed by documents now that they put out on the eve of the war. It's a security matter at this point, not to be left to the future generations to deal with.

    Russia broke the principle of non-aggression (and probably several international treaties) so we can also speak about whether their language deserves that type of protection within the European space. I believe it does at least partially, but it is not up to me and it is a legitimate question, imo. And on a more human level, I don't think I have to remind you that Germans were shunned after 1945 in many places.

    You posted a clip from a TV studio in Lviv. And then suggested that it's so awful that this Ukrainian statesman said that there should be no Russian in Ukraine. This could definitely be the case for Lviv, as Western Ukraine is more similar to the pre-1940 Baltic states or Slovakia than it is to Eastern Ukraine. It doesn't mean anything, just that to force Russian on them, the way you attempted to do, is not only illogical but also very unseemly in the current context.

    Do I personally like this? No, as I feel both languages were cohabiting pretty well prior to the war. The issue was mainly geopolitical and about loyalty.

    Replies: @German_reader

    , @AnonfromTN
    @German_reader

    Ukrainian regime is not agreement-capable. Ukraine signed Minsk, then Minsk-2, and never fulfilled any of its obligations. Takes after its puppeteers: the US signed a nuclear agreement with Iran…

    Replies: @A123

  122. @German_reader
    @Anon 2

    I've heard from reliable sources that soon there'll be a settlement of the heirless property issue which will involve much of Warsaw's housing stock being given to Jewish organizations. The NYC-based company which will administer it apparently already has plans for massive increases in rent and for building several mega-brothels which will cater to Israeli tourists.
    There are also plans for making Ukrainian an official language in Poland that has equal status with Polish. School curricula will be adapted to focus on the dark legacy of Polish colonialism and on Bandera's fight for freedom (to be celebrated by regular marches involving brandishing of farm utensils).

    Replies: @A123, @Wokechoke

    I’ve heard from reliable sources

    My reliable sources say that Germany will pay over $1 Trillion in reparations to Poland in the near future.

    heirless property issue which will involve much of Warsaw’s housing stock … already has plans for massive increases in rent

    All significant commercial property was 100% resolved decades ago. Private residential claims have to be adjudicated one-by-one in Polish courts. And, Polish law at most would require cash compensation, they would not change title of owner occupied property.

    Thus, the only real estate in play are explicity religious sites (e.g. synagogues and graveyards) that have been over built. This is a *tiny* amount of acreage.

    Poland will be use a small portion of German reparations to buy out vague Israeli claims, relocate the deceased, etc. Very little land will actually change hands.

    What will Poland do with the rest of the reparations they extract from Germany?

    Jewish organizations. The NYC-based company

    Palestinian Jews dislike post-Judaic NYC apostates. Why would real Jews let fake non-Jews take control of anything? This exact scheme was introduced and routed last year.

    Any money would go to management in Israel where Likud and Orthodox politicians would strike a deal over management. NYC Sh!tL!bs will be totally shut out.

    PEACE 😇

    • Replies: @German_reader
    @A123


    What will Poland do with the rest of the reparations they extract from Germany?
     
    Maybe buy you a sense of humour? Of course a Judeo-Christian one.

    Replies: @A123

  123. @German_reader
    @Anon 2

    I've heard from reliable sources that soon there'll be a settlement of the heirless property issue which will involve much of Warsaw's housing stock being given to Jewish organizations. The NYC-based company which will administer it apparently already has plans for massive increases in rent and for building several mega-brothels which will cater to Israeli tourists.
    There are also plans for making Ukrainian an official language in Poland that has equal status with Polish. School curricula will be adapted to focus on the dark legacy of Polish colonialism and on Bandera's fight for freedom (to be celebrated by regular marches involving brandishing of farm utensils).

    Replies: @A123, @Wokechoke

    When the Jews realize they can make more money from the insurance on the property won they will burn Warsaw down.

  124. sher singh says:
    @Yevardian
    @sher singh


    You’re not Greek or Iranian
     
    ?

    & like Germans will cease to exist in a century.
     
    Germany will always be a 50x better place to live than anywhere in India whatever its future ethnic mixture is. I notice you don't live there.
    Well, there's been a successful Armenian diaspora independent of national state since Kilikian Armenia fell in 14th century. It's not as if the Singh's have country of their own, as I remember the Khalistan insurrection at the Golden Temple didn't go very well.

    Replies: @sher singh

    You’re not Greek or Iranian – you’re random mountain residue betwixt Empires.
    Khalistan insurrection at the Golden Temple didn’t go well. – A Company of Singhs killed a Btn of Infantry.

    There was also the siege of Delhi last year – talking is all Armenians can do.

    I notice you don’t live there. – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anandpur_Sahib

    You have an Anglo surname & are unarmed – on top of that you’re a christcuck.
    A living meme up till the white man your sister married, go rope.

    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ

  125. @A123
    @Wokechoke


    WC: A Jewish head of state in Europe is an evil thing. End of story. I know you are not allowed to say such things in Germany but the evidence is in

    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-200/#comment-5617740

     


    Zemmour wanted to deal with Muslim immigration
     
    WC: He’d have done nothing.

    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-200/#comment-5617985

     

    So "Joooozzzzz" have no power? Zemmour could not have done anything? That seems weak (not evil).

    There seems to be an inconsistency with your logic surrounding the "Joooozzzzz".

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    Why would he block Arab migration to France? Even if he said wished to stop it, he was only pulling the Gallic Leg.

    • Replies: @A123
    @Wokechoke


    Why would he block Arab migration to France
     
    Are you seriously asking why a French Infidel would want to stop paedophile, murderous Muslims (Arab, African, Persian, Paki, etc.) from invading?

    Go read the story about the Mohammadites raping and killing a little girl that I posted above.

    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-200/#comment-5617979

    Why would Zemmour, or any Judeo-Christian, want Jihadist Rape-ugees?

    Islam is a threat to all Infidels In France (primarily Christians and Jews).

    PEACE 😇
  126. @A123
    @German_reader


    I’ve heard from reliable sources
     
    My reliable sources say that Germany will pay over $1 Trillion in reparations to Poland in the near future.

    heirless property issue which will involve much of Warsaw’s housing stock ... already has plans for massive increases in rent
     
    All significant commercial property was 100% resolved decades ago. Private residential claims have to be adjudicated one-by-one in Polish courts. And, Polish law at most would require cash compensation, they would not change title of owner occupied property.

    Thus, the only real estate in play are explicity religious sites (e.g. synagogues and graveyards) that have been over built. This is a *tiny* amount of acreage.

    Poland will be use a small portion of German reparations to buy out vague Israeli claims, relocate the deceased, etc. Very little land will actually change hands.

    What will Poland do with the rest of the reparations they extract from Germany?

    Jewish organizations. The NYC-based company
     
    Palestinian Jews dislike post-Judaic NYC apostates. Why would real Jews let fake non-Jews take control of anything? This exact scheme was introduced and routed last year.

    Any money would go to management in Israel where Likud and Orthodox politicians would strike a deal over management. NYC Sh!tL!bs will be totally shut out.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @German_reader

    What will Poland do with the rest of the reparations they extract from Germany?

    Maybe buy you a sense of humour? Of course a Judeo-Christian one.

    • Replies: @A123
    @German_reader

    I have a sense of humor.

    Your antics, while fact free, are very funny. I laugh at your dribbling and capering on a regular basis.

    PEACE 😇

  127. @Wokechoke
    @A123

    Why would he block Arab migration to France? Even if he said wished to stop it, he was only pulling the Gallic Leg.

    Replies: @A123

    Why would he block Arab migration to France

    Are you seriously asking why a French Infidel would want to stop paedophile, murderous Muslims (Arab, African, Persian, Paki, etc.) from invading?

    Go read the story about the Mohammadites raping and killing a little girl that I posted above.

    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-200/#comment-5617979

    Why would Zemmour, or any Judeo-Christian, want Jihadist Rape-ugees?

    Islam is a threat to all Infidels In France (primarily Christians and Jews).

    PEACE 😇

  128. @German_reader
    @A123


    What will Poland do with the rest of the reparations they extract from Germany?
     
    Maybe buy you a sense of humour? Of course a Judeo-Christian one.

    Replies: @A123

    I have a sense of humor.

    Your antics, while fact free, are very funny. I laugh at your dribbling and capering on a regular basis.

    PEACE 😇

  129. A 1943 tongue in cheek demonstration of the drone like home delivery capabilities of the experimental Sikorsky VS-300 helicopter. The test pilot is Les Morris and the Connecticut household on the receiving end of the groceries is that of his own wife and children.

    [MORE]

    On Nov 29, 1945, a hovering Sikorsky YR-5A at their Bridgeport, Conn plant hovers with an additional ten extra passengers on board. Tragically, it’s said on good authority that the plant’s chief safety officer took just one look at the photo and died of a heart attack that very same day! 😉

    https://www.thisdayinaviation.com/18-august-1943/

    • Replies: @songbird
    @S

    Speaking of drones: Zeihan wants people to call their congressmen to tell them to repeal the Jones Act, which was passed in 1920 and requires all commerce between US ports in US waters to be on US built, flagged, and owned vessels, crewed by US citizens.

    He says they are all union jobs and that traffic on American waterways decreased by 90%, after the act was passed. And that carriage on water is 10 times cheaper than on land, and that almost everything is now shipped by truck with is very expensive in comparison. And one of his favorite points is that the US is very well-watered with navigable rivers. Moreso than any other country in the world.

    I consider it quite a curious holdover from before globalization, and would feel it very unsavory to have foreigners plying all the freshwater ports, deep in the interior.

    Seems to me like a better solution would be robo-ships, which I would speculate would be much more practical than flying drones or self-driving trucks.

    Replies: @A123, @S

  130. @S
    A 1943 tongue in cheek demonstration of the drone like home delivery capabilities of the experimental Sikorsky VS-300 helicopter. The test pilot is Les Morris and the Connecticut household on the receiving end of the groceries is that of his own wife and children.

    https://youtu.be/SEAy2Yx_dY4




    On Nov 29, 1945, a hovering Sikorsky YR-5A at their Bridgeport, Conn plant hovers with an additional ten extra passengers on board. Tragically, it's said on good authority that the plant's chief safety officer took just one look at the photo and died of a heart attack that very same day! ;-)

    https://static.thisdayinaviation.com/wp-content/uploads/tdia//2017/08/S48-2.jpg

    https://www.thisdayinaviation.com/18-august-1943/

    Replies: @songbird

    Speaking of drones: Zeihan wants people to call their congressmen to tell them to repeal the Jones Act, which was passed in 1920 and requires all commerce between US ports in US waters to be on US built, flagged, and owned vessels, crewed by US citizens.

    He says they are all union jobs and that traffic on American waterways decreased by 90%, after the act was passed. And that carriage on water is 10 times cheaper than on land, and that almost everything is now shipped by truck with is very expensive in comparison. And one of his favorite points is that the US is very well-watered with navigable rivers. Moreso than any other country in the world.

    I consider it quite a curious holdover from before globalization, and would feel it very unsavory to have foreigners plying all the freshwater ports, deep in the interior.

    Seems to me like a better solution would be robo-ships, which I would speculate would be much more practical than flying drones or self-driving trucks.

    • Replies: @A123
    @songbird


    Zeihan wants people to call their congressmen to tell them to repeal the Jones Act, which was passed in 1920 and requires all commerce between US ports in US waters to be on US built, flagged, and owned vessels, crewed by US citizens.
     
    Do you have a citation to back this up?

    Zeihan has taken stances on reinvigorating the U.S. economy via Reindustrialization (e.g. microchips). Jones Act repeal does not seem consistent, though I concede he is eclectic.


    He says they are all union jobs
     
    There are legislative & regulatory options to open the market to nonunion competition while retaining the Jones Act, 100% U.S. requirement.

    traffic on American waterways decreased by 90%
     
    How much of this was decrease was driven by:

    • Trains becoming *much* better?
    • Complex water cargo regulation, laws, insurance, etc.?
    • Radically different East-West (rather than North-South) population, and thus shipping requirements?

    There is no navigable, freshwater connection from the West Coast to a Mississippi River tributary. The Panama Canal is well out of the way.


    very unsavory to have foreigners plying all the freshwater ports, deep in the interior.
     
    I concur.

    The problem is a shortage of water in the Mississippi River. There are plenty of barges and crews.

    PEACE 😇

     
    https://grains.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Barge-Rail-Trucks_Compare-scaled.jpg

    Replies: @songbird, @Mr. Hack

    , @S
    @songbird

    I wasn't familiar with the Jones Act. Probably was as you allude for future wartime security reasons and maintaining US capability in that area as a strategically important industry.

    About all those US 'navigable rivers' Zeihan was talking about, it reminds me of this 1963 Dutch documentary I saw. It seemed the Dutch really did intensively exploit their waterways and canals like a highway system. It showed Dutch people of all ages, including both young adult men and women, piloting the barges.

    The robo ship idea is interesting. I imagine it has been studied. It would seem a robot ship, perhaps 'piloted' by an individual remotely with a console (who would also be piloting other ships simultaneously) would be a lot more readily feasible and safe for large scale shipping than drone aircraft and self driving cars and trucks.

    They need to be careful with this automation stuff. People need to be meaningfully occupied.

    The Idiocracy/pleasure orientated Brave New World/1984ish brainwashed slave world they so far seem to be creating looks like a wrong path for mankind for sure.

    https://youtu.be/gqy1dRgn7Pc

    Replies: @songbird

  131. @German_reader
    @AP

    Ukraine is a signatory to this:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Charter_for_Regional_or_Minority_Languages
    imo Ukraine should avoid anything that looks like repression of the Russian language, but it's of course their decision. Don't be surprised though if it costs Ukraine its sympathies among liberals who think Ukraine is fighting for "European values".

    Replies: @LatW, @AnonfromTN

    Ukraine is a signatory to this:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Charter_for_Regional_or_Minority_Language

    This Charter is under the auspices of the European Council and that is a separate organization from the European Commission and a separate set of laws from the acquis communautaire.

    Of course, traditionally, the European Council has been closely consulted.

    However, we must keep in mind two things. Ukraine ratified this treaty in 2005, in good spirit, when Ukraine had no idea it would be attacked by its neighbor (well, some nationalists knew it was coming, but they were too few and were ignored). I know that this treaty is meant to protect the minorities first and foremost, and not to protect from an aggressive neighbor (one of the owners of the protected languages), however, this can be considered an unusual situation where the speakers of that language are used as the fifth column to destabilize the state. These treaties should no longer be viewed in abstract, but should take into account the changing international background. The point of this type of legislation should be to protect in a new, more civilized European space and not to be used as an instrument in neo-colonial wars.

    [MORE]

    Second, this is a very dire and dramatic situation that we practically haven’t experienced since the 1940s (the aim was to destroy Ukraine as a country). A lot can be reconsidered, a lot of treaties revisited both in Europe & Ukraine and in Russia. Russia has stepped out of some of her liabilities as well (afaik, Russia stepped out of some war crimes related obligations and if Russia isolates further, could potentially exit more treaties). We will have to review a lot of things to figure out how we are going to live with Russia on our doorstep in the future.

    I’m not saying that Ukraine should exit this treaty, but it is no longer 2004 or even 2014 and the above has to be taken into consideration when discussing any type of international minority related obligations to ever be put on Ukraine. It most likely will be taken into consideration in the future conversations with the EU. Especially in the light of the recent drone attacks, where a pregnant woman was killed and similar atrocities committed, Ukraine is likely to get leeway.

    You must also understand one basic thing. Language is not the main issue there but loyalty. Many Russophones are not only loyal, but are among the fiercest fighters for Ukraine. In the future, they need to create an environment that works for them, not because Europe said so. So that they can cohabit normally again. It is up to them to figure it out.

    Language is only an issue so far that their linguistic situation created a fifth column. This is what they want to avert now. Because Russia has openly said – whenever there is at least one Russian speaker, we can go in and destroy that country. It’s backed by documents now that they put out on the eve of the war. It’s a security matter at this point, not to be left to the future generations to deal with.

    Russia broke the principle of non-aggression (and probably several international treaties) so we can also speak about whether their language deserves that type of protection within the European space. I believe it does at least partially, but it is not up to me and it is a legitimate question, imo. And on a more human level, I don’t think I have to remind you that Germans were shunned after 1945 in many places.

    You posted a clip from a TV studio in Lviv. And then suggested that it’s so awful that this Ukrainian statesman said that there should be no Russian in Ukraine. This could definitely be the case for Lviv, as Western Ukraine is more similar to the pre-1940 Baltic states or Slovakia than it is to Eastern Ukraine. It doesn’t mean anything, just that to force Russian on them, the way you attempted to do, is not only illogical but also very unseemly in the current context.

    Do I personally like this? No, as I feel both languages were cohabiting pretty well prior to the war. The issue was mainly geopolitical and about loyalty.

    • Thanks: Mr. Hack
    • Replies: @German_reader
    @LatW


    Many Russophones are not only loyal, but are among the fiercest fighters for Ukraine.
     
    Then why turn the language issue into a loyalty test?

    And on a more human level, I don’t think I have to remind you that Germans were shunned after 1945 in many places.
     
    What Russia has done so far in this war isn't nearly on the same level as what Germans did in 1939-1945. Of course this could easily change in the near future (very ominous statements by Shoigu about Ukraine allegedly building a dirty bomb, one wonders what Russian intentions are here, are they planning something of the sort themselves?), but so far all this talk about "genocide" etc. is simply propaganda. I do believe that some allegations against Russian troops are true...they probably do arrest Ukrainian civilians they suspect of being anti-Russian, torture them and in some cases at least kill them. This is all very bad, but unfortunately it's not that different from what even democratic Western states have done within living memory (not to mention various Western "allies"). The same applies to an even greater degree to "Russian drones have killed a pregnant woman", where in many cases it's probably not even clear to what extent civilian deaths were intentional.
    Of course it's understandable that Ukrainians are outraged about any of their own casualties, both civilian and military. But frankly, I cannot but suspect the motives of outsiders like yourself who harp so much on the atrocity issue and bring it up as an argument that there can be no negotiations at all with Russia (not even for an imperfect ceasefire, which is probably the only somewhat realistic possibility right now), that this must end in total Ukrainian victory, no matter the costs, and that citizens of the Western states supporting Ukraine have no right no question Ukrainian policies.

    Replies: @LatW, @Yevardian

  132. @songbird
    @S

    Speaking of drones: Zeihan wants people to call their congressmen to tell them to repeal the Jones Act, which was passed in 1920 and requires all commerce between US ports in US waters to be on US built, flagged, and owned vessels, crewed by US citizens.

    He says they are all union jobs and that traffic on American waterways decreased by 90%, after the act was passed. And that carriage on water is 10 times cheaper than on land, and that almost everything is now shipped by truck with is very expensive in comparison. And one of his favorite points is that the US is very well-watered with navigable rivers. Moreso than any other country in the world.

    I consider it quite a curious holdover from before globalization, and would feel it very unsavory to have foreigners plying all the freshwater ports, deep in the interior.

    Seems to me like a better solution would be robo-ships, which I would speculate would be much more practical than flying drones or self-driving trucks.

    Replies: @A123, @S

    Zeihan wants people to call their congressmen to tell them to repeal the Jones Act, which was passed in 1920 and requires all commerce between US ports in US waters to be on US built, flagged, and owned vessels, crewed by US citizens.

    Do you have a citation to back this up?

    Zeihan has taken stances on reinvigorating the U.S. economy via Reindustrialization (e.g. microchips). Jones Act repeal does not seem consistent, though I concede he is eclectic.

    He says they are all union jobs

    There are legislative & regulatory options to open the market to nonunion competition while retaining the Jones Act, 100% U.S. requirement.

    traffic on American waterways decreased by 90%

    How much of this was decrease was driven by:

    • Trains becoming *much* better?
    • Complex water cargo regulation, laws, insurance, etc.?
    • Radically different East-West (rather than North-South) population, and thus shipping requirements?

    There is no navigable, freshwater connection from the West Coast to a Mississippi River tributary. The Panama Canal is well out of the way.

    very unsavory to have foreigners plying all the freshwater ports, deep in the interior.

    I concur.

    The problem is a shortage of water in the Mississippi River. There are plenty of barges and crews.

    PEACE 😇

     

    • Replies: @songbird
    @A123

    Interesting chart.

    Here is a very short Zeihan vidya:
    https://youtu.be/Sc128K695R0

    Replies: @A123

    , @Mr. Hack
    @A123


    Complex water cargo regulation, laws, insurance, etc.?
     
    Strange, that you recently weren't able to acknowledge that there are such complex laws that could regulate water rights/obligations between different states, as between Russia and Ukraine in Crimea, not to mention fees and costs for transporting water. But you need not worry and correct yourself, for there may soon be a Russian solution to this problem, the obliteration of the Antonivka water dam, that will permanently prohibit the transport of Dnieper water to Crimea.
  133. German_reader says:
    @LatW
    @German_reader


    Ukraine is a signatory to this:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Charter_for_Regional_or_Minority_Language
     
    This Charter is under the auspices of the European Council and that is a separate organization from the European Commission and a separate set of laws from the acquis communautaire.

    Of course, traditionally, the European Council has been closely consulted.

    However, we must keep in mind two things. Ukraine ratified this treaty in 2005, in good spirit, when Ukraine had no idea it would be attacked by its neighbor (well, some nationalists knew it was coming, but they were too few and were ignored). I know that this treaty is meant to protect the minorities first and foremost, and not to protect from an aggressive neighbor (one of the owners of the protected languages), however, this can be considered an unusual situation where the speakers of that language are used as the fifth column to destabilize the state. These treaties should no longer be viewed in abstract, but should take into account the changing international background. The point of this type of legislation should be to protect in a new, more civilized European space and not to be used as an instrument in neo-colonial wars.

    Second, this is a very dire and dramatic situation that we practically haven't experienced since the 1940s (the aim was to destroy Ukraine as a country). A lot can be reconsidered, a lot of treaties revisited both in Europe & Ukraine and in Russia. Russia has stepped out of some of her liabilities as well (afaik, Russia stepped out of some war crimes related obligations and if Russia isolates further, could potentially exit more treaties). We will have to review a lot of things to figure out how we are going to live with Russia on our doorstep in the future.

    I'm not saying that Ukraine should exit this treaty, but it is no longer 2004 or even 2014 and the above has to be taken into consideration when discussing any type of international minority related obligations to ever be put on Ukraine. It most likely will be taken into consideration in the future conversations with the EU. Especially in the light of the recent drone attacks, where a pregnant woman was killed and similar atrocities committed, Ukraine is likely to get leeway.

    You must also understand one basic thing. Language is not the main issue there but loyalty. Many Russophones are not only loyal, but are among the fiercest fighters for Ukraine. In the future, they need to create an environment that works for them, not because Europe said so. So that they can cohabit normally again. It is up to them to figure it out.

    Language is only an issue so far that their linguistic situation created a fifth column. This is what they want to avert now. Because Russia has openly said - whenever there is at least one Russian speaker, we can go in and destroy that country. It's backed by documents now that they put out on the eve of the war. It's a security matter at this point, not to be left to the future generations to deal with.

    Russia broke the principle of non-aggression (and probably several international treaties) so we can also speak about whether their language deserves that type of protection within the European space. I believe it does at least partially, but it is not up to me and it is a legitimate question, imo. And on a more human level, I don't think I have to remind you that Germans were shunned after 1945 in many places.

    You posted a clip from a TV studio in Lviv. And then suggested that it's so awful that this Ukrainian statesman said that there should be no Russian in Ukraine. This could definitely be the case for Lviv, as Western Ukraine is more similar to the pre-1940 Baltic states or Slovakia than it is to Eastern Ukraine. It doesn't mean anything, just that to force Russian on them, the way you attempted to do, is not only illogical but also very unseemly in the current context.

    Do I personally like this? No, as I feel both languages were cohabiting pretty well prior to the war. The issue was mainly geopolitical and about loyalty.

    Replies: @German_reader

    Many Russophones are not only loyal, but are among the fiercest fighters for Ukraine.

    Then why turn the language issue into a loyalty test?

    And on a more human level, I don’t think I have to remind you that Germans were shunned after 1945 in many places.

    What Russia has done so far in this war isn’t nearly on the same level as what Germans did in 1939-1945. Of course this could easily change in the near future (very ominous statements by Shoigu about Ukraine allegedly building a dirty bomb, one wonders what Russian intentions are here, are they planning something of the sort themselves?), but so far all this talk about “genocide” etc. is simply propaganda. I do believe that some allegations against Russian troops are true…they probably do arrest Ukrainian civilians they suspect of being anti-Russian, torture them and in some cases at least kill them. This is all very bad, but unfortunately it’s not that different from what even democratic Western states have done within living memory (not to mention various Western “allies”). The same applies to an even greater degree to “Russian drones have killed a pregnant woman”, where in many cases it’s probably not even clear to what extent civilian deaths were intentional.
    Of course it’s understandable that Ukrainians are outraged about any of their own casualties, both civilian and military. But frankly, I cannot but suspect the motives of outsiders like yourself who harp so much on the atrocity issue and bring it up as an argument that there can be no negotiations at all with Russia (not even for an imperfect ceasefire, which is probably the only somewhat realistic possibility right now), that this must end in total Ukrainian victory, no matter the costs, and that citizens of the Western states supporting Ukraine have no right no question Ukrainian policies.

    • Replies: @LatW
    @German_reader


    Then why turn the language issue into a loyalty test?
     
    It wouldn't be a loyalty test but more of a security issue for the future. They need more cohesion. So it cannot be used to stir up trouble from outside. Also, I believe the Ukrainians should have the right to decide these things without outsiders interfering. They are themselves switching to Ukrainian. There will de facto be Russian there and Russian will be used as lingua franca in the former Rus space. But given how things are going, the Russophone population will be reduced (most of the ones recently deported are Russian speakers). The problem is that that population will then be used by Russia to create new soldiers to attack Ukraine in the future, so it's especially perverse. But it's nothing new at all. And the areas in the East that could be still liberated will be depopulated and ruined.

    What Russia has done so far in this war isn’t nearly on the same level as what Germans did in 1939-1945.
     
    God forbid it was as bad as that! But it is bad enough, just way too much. Don't assume it will not be taken into account. Things will not go back to how they used to be. This is too big.

    Of course this could easily change in the near future (very ominous statements by Shoigu about Ukraine allegedly building a dirty bomb, one wonders what Russian intentions are here, are they planning something of the sort themselves?)
     
    From what can be gauged through some sources from Russia, Shoigu isn't really in charge anymore. It's also possible that the nuclear issue has been resolved (there have been conversations and warnings from the West). Also, I believe there is a man in Moscow or a group of men, within the security agencies, who could possibly stop it if the "one in the bunker" decided to go that route. I'm sure they will at least try. Ofc, not a given, they may not succeed.

    but so far all this talk about “genocide” etc. is simply propaganda.
     
    I wish it were mere propaganda. One doesn't have to use the word "genocide" but it's clear that Ukraine's population is deliberately being reduced. The irony is that you can just as well call it "genocide against Russian speakers".

    where in many cases it’s probably not even clear to what extent civilian deaths were intentional.

     

    That's just not true. They have been deliberately targeting civilian infrastructure for a while now. A big percentage of the drones are now being hit in the air. So the intended damage is much higher and much more sinister than what we see. Afaik, they targeted even Lviv with drones but they were taken out in the air.

    But frankly, I cannot but suspect the motives of outsiders like yourself who harp so much on the atrocity issue and bring it up as an argument that there can be no negotiations at all with Russia
     
    So you think the atrocities should just be swept under the carpet? There are awful many of them by now. My words that I post here, for the most part, are very closely aligned with what a large percentage of Ukrainians believe (as well as a small group of the Russian nationalists who are on the side of Ukraine and Europe). We have a common outlook.

    that this must end in total Ukrainian victory, no matter the costs,
     
    No one knows where it will end, but as long as there are men (and women) willing and able to fight and if they receive weapons, it will go on. That's how it always works. They are being constantly shelled and attacked so they can't stop. Would you in their position? You wouldn't defend yourself? Sorry to mention this but they have kids and it's a perspective that you may not be able to relate to.

    that citizens of the Western states supporting Ukraine have no right no question Ukrainian policies.

     

    You have a right to question certain things. But there is a fine line. You can question what kind of assistance to deliver and how it is used, but I don't think you can question internal policies (since the decision has already been made by the West to help). At least not with the paternalistic tone that you do. Things have gone too far and the war needs to run its course now. The Russians chose to be there. When you walk into a country with weapons in your hands in order to murder you have already chosen your destiny.

    Remember, that a large proportion of Westerners, especially in places such as Scandinavia, still support Ukraine. So you are as much against them as you are against us.

    Replies: @German_reader, @Matra, @Yevardian, @silviosilver

    , @Yevardian
    @German_reader


    (very ominous statements by Shoigu about Ukraine allegedly building a dirty bomb, one wonders what Russian intentions are here, are they planning something of the sort themselves?)
     
    All these outraged claims from Ukrainians and Russians are tinged with very black humour for me, because whenever one side plausibly asserts the other side is planning on [something awful], you can virtually guarantee it as an indication they've also considered it themselves.

    I have no idea which side did Bucha and honestly don't care. Then the mutual threats of blowing up dams, nuclear powerplants, civilian infrastructure, shared hysterical accusations of genocide etc, etc. It's all so tiresome...

    Replies: @German_reader, @LatW

  134. @A123
    @songbird


    Zeihan wants people to call their congressmen to tell them to repeal the Jones Act, which was passed in 1920 and requires all commerce between US ports in US waters to be on US built, flagged, and owned vessels, crewed by US citizens.
     
    Do you have a citation to back this up?

    Zeihan has taken stances on reinvigorating the U.S. economy via Reindustrialization (e.g. microchips). Jones Act repeal does not seem consistent, though I concede he is eclectic.


    He says they are all union jobs
     
    There are legislative & regulatory options to open the market to nonunion competition while retaining the Jones Act, 100% U.S. requirement.

    traffic on American waterways decreased by 90%
     
    How much of this was decrease was driven by:

    • Trains becoming *much* better?
    • Complex water cargo regulation, laws, insurance, etc.?
    • Radically different East-West (rather than North-South) population, and thus shipping requirements?

    There is no navigable, freshwater connection from the West Coast to a Mississippi River tributary. The Panama Canal is well out of the way.


    very unsavory to have foreigners plying all the freshwater ports, deep in the interior.
     
    I concur.

    The problem is a shortage of water in the Mississippi River. There are plenty of barges and crews.

    PEACE 😇

     
    https://grains.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Barge-Rail-Trucks_Compare-scaled.jpg

    Replies: @songbird, @Mr. Hack

    Interesting chart.

    Here is a very short Zeihan vidya:

    [MORE]

    • Replies: @A123
    @songbird


    Here is a very short Zeihan vidya:
     
    Thanks.

    Ziehan does not address vessel size.

    Yes. Staggeringly huge cargo vessels moving between ports with specialized cranes is very cheap.

    What about, small vessels, short seawater transits, between 2nd and 3rd tier port cities? I suspect the timing would be problematic and the costs would be more "train-like" versus the "cheapness" of epic scale cargo carriers.

    PEACE 😇

     
    https://gcaptain.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/BgBz4uKCEAExUXY.jpg
  135. Will indulge into quoting myself, but roughly one year and half ago offered to make some bet:

    Anyway, any bets on who and when will become the first UK PM from former Indian colony – Priti, Rishi or Sajid?

    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-153/#comment-4719785

    ofc, it was done half jokingly, but yet here we are now quickly nearing that point of Rishi as the acting official PM becoming reality, lol

    Will it be India getting the revenge and now beginning projecting its power onto UK or banker Sunak will be used just as a vehicle/banner in order to pull nowday Hindus closer into Western camp against China or RF?

    • Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
    @sudden death

    Everybody in the Middle East thought Barak Obama was going to be the greatest thing and the first thing he did was multiply drone bombs in Arab countries by 5X.

    That guy is going to do what the 100 top dogs in Britain tell him to do.

  136. @songbird
    @A123

    Interesting chart.

    Here is a very short Zeihan vidya:
    https://youtu.be/Sc128K695R0

    Replies: @A123

    Here is a very short Zeihan vidya:

    Thanks.

    Ziehan does not address vessel size.

    Yes. Staggeringly huge cargo vessels moving between ports with specialized cranes is very cheap.

    What about, small vessels, short seawater transits, between 2nd and 3rd tier port cities? I suspect the timing would be problematic and the costs would be more “train-like” versus the “cheapness” of epic scale cargo carriers.

    PEACE 😇

     

    • Agree: songbird
  137. @sher singh
    @Barbarossa

    Wrong man to have that convo with.
    You don't eat dogs, cats, snakes or horses.

    Your preferences are shaped by those who took your foreskin||
    Aryans have Maryada - a clear code - it'll please you to save your life in the interest of cow protection||

    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ

    Replies: @Barbarossa

    It was just a throw away pun you know. I couldn’t resist that deities was spelled dieties.

    Hanging with too many poop stirrers and retards at the Discord seems to have made you a little uptight. It sounds like an unbelievable idiotic time over there. Thanks for reporting on it so we don’t have to find out personally!

    Your preferences are shaped by those who took your foreskin

    Celts have been eating cattle and pork long before any circumcision. Don’t worry though, I don’t believe in circumcision myself anyhow and have butcher dates in the next couple of weeks for a pair of oinkers and a troublesome bull calf.

    But we’ve covered that ground already and will have to agree to disagree!

    • Replies: @Sher Singh
    @Barbarossa

    https://twitter.com/CotswoldArch/status/1463417886400258053?s=20

    We'll kill to protect the cow.
    You won't kill to practice cow slaughter.

    The result's already decided, Guru's Hukam is final.

    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ

    Replies: @Barbarossa

  138. @A123
    @songbird


    Zeihan wants people to call their congressmen to tell them to repeal the Jones Act, which was passed in 1920 and requires all commerce between US ports in US waters to be on US built, flagged, and owned vessels, crewed by US citizens.
     
    Do you have a citation to back this up?

    Zeihan has taken stances on reinvigorating the U.S. economy via Reindustrialization (e.g. microchips). Jones Act repeal does not seem consistent, though I concede he is eclectic.


    He says they are all union jobs
     
    There are legislative & regulatory options to open the market to nonunion competition while retaining the Jones Act, 100% U.S. requirement.

    traffic on American waterways decreased by 90%
     
    How much of this was decrease was driven by:

    • Trains becoming *much* better?
    • Complex water cargo regulation, laws, insurance, etc.?
    • Radically different East-West (rather than North-South) population, and thus shipping requirements?

    There is no navigable, freshwater connection from the West Coast to a Mississippi River tributary. The Panama Canal is well out of the way.


    very unsavory to have foreigners plying all the freshwater ports, deep in the interior.
     
    I concur.

    The problem is a shortage of water in the Mississippi River. There are plenty of barges and crews.

    PEACE 😇

     
    https://grains.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/Barge-Rail-Trucks_Compare-scaled.jpg

    Replies: @songbird, @Mr. Hack

    Complex water cargo regulation, laws, insurance, etc.?

    Strange, that you recently weren’t able to acknowledge that there are such complex laws that could regulate water rights/obligations between different states, as between Russia and Ukraine in Crimea, not to mention fees and costs for transporting water. But you need not worry and correct yourself, for there may soon be a Russian solution to this problem, the obliteration of the Antonivka water dam, that will permanently prohibit the transport of Dnieper water to Crimea.

  139. I recently criticized Israel for not providing Ukraine with defensive systems that could help shield civilians from Russian drone attacks within Ukrainian cities. Now I must retract my criticism and thank Israel for its recent successful attacks and destruction of Iranian drone assemble plants. THANK YOU ISRAEL!

    Russia actively uses Iranian-made Shahed-136 kamikaze drones – repainted and renamed as Geran-2 – in its barbaric strikes at Ukraine aimed at destroying the Ukrainian energy infrastructure. There is a lot of evidence of this, as the Ukrainian Defense Forces have shot down about 250 of these UAVs. Nevertheless, Tehran consistently denies its involvement in the supply of drones to Russia for use against Ukraine. There is also a hypothesis that Russia obtains Iranian drones from Iran via third countries. If so, it is possible the Israeli missile attack hit the assembly of drones intended for further attacks on Ukraine.

    https://www.ukrainianworldcongress.org/israeli-missile-attack-hits-iranian-drones-assembly-facility-in-syria/#:~:text=The%20operation%20that%20assembled%20Iranian,Rights%20(SOHR)%20reported%20today.

  140. @German_reader
    @LatW


    Many Russophones are not only loyal, but are among the fiercest fighters for Ukraine.
     
    Then why turn the language issue into a loyalty test?

    And on a more human level, I don’t think I have to remind you that Germans were shunned after 1945 in many places.
     
    What Russia has done so far in this war isn't nearly on the same level as what Germans did in 1939-1945. Of course this could easily change in the near future (very ominous statements by Shoigu about Ukraine allegedly building a dirty bomb, one wonders what Russian intentions are here, are they planning something of the sort themselves?), but so far all this talk about "genocide" etc. is simply propaganda. I do believe that some allegations against Russian troops are true...they probably do arrest Ukrainian civilians they suspect of being anti-Russian, torture them and in some cases at least kill them. This is all very bad, but unfortunately it's not that different from what even democratic Western states have done within living memory (not to mention various Western "allies"). The same applies to an even greater degree to "Russian drones have killed a pregnant woman", where in many cases it's probably not even clear to what extent civilian deaths were intentional.
    Of course it's understandable that Ukrainians are outraged about any of their own casualties, both civilian and military. But frankly, I cannot but suspect the motives of outsiders like yourself who harp so much on the atrocity issue and bring it up as an argument that there can be no negotiations at all with Russia (not even for an imperfect ceasefire, which is probably the only somewhat realistic possibility right now), that this must end in total Ukrainian victory, no matter the costs, and that citizens of the Western states supporting Ukraine have no right no question Ukrainian policies.

    Replies: @LatW, @Yevardian

    Then why turn the language issue into a loyalty test?

    It wouldn’t be a loyalty test but more of a security issue for the future. They need more cohesion. So it cannot be used to stir up trouble from outside. Also, I believe the Ukrainians should have the right to decide these things without outsiders interfering. They are themselves switching to Ukrainian. There will de facto be Russian there and Russian will be used as lingua franca in the former Rus space. But given how things are going, the Russophone population will be reduced (most of the ones recently deported are Russian speakers). The problem is that that population will then be used by Russia to create new soldiers to attack Ukraine in the future, so it’s especially perverse. But it’s nothing new at all. And the areas in the East that could be still liberated will be depopulated and ruined.

    [MORE]

    What Russia has done so far in this war isn’t nearly on the same level as what Germans did in 1939-1945.

    God forbid it was as bad as that! But it is bad enough, just way too much. Don’t assume it will not be taken into account. Things will not go back to how they used to be. This is too big.

    Of course this could easily change in the near future (very ominous statements by Shoigu about Ukraine allegedly building a dirty bomb, one wonders what Russian intentions are here, are they planning something of the sort themselves?)

    From what can be gauged through some sources from Russia, Shoigu isn’t really in charge anymore. It’s also possible that the nuclear issue has been resolved (there have been conversations and warnings from the West). Also, I believe there is a man in Moscow or a group of men, within the security agencies, who could possibly stop it if the “one in the bunker” decided to go that route. I’m sure they will at least try. Ofc, not a given, they may not succeed.

    but so far all this talk about “genocide” etc. is simply propaganda.

    I wish it were mere propaganda. One doesn’t have to use the word “genocide” but it’s clear that Ukraine’s population is deliberately being reduced. The irony is that you can just as well call it “genocide against Russian speakers”.

    where in many cases it’s probably not even clear to what extent civilian deaths were intentional.

    That’s just not true. They have been deliberately targeting civilian infrastructure for a while now. A big percentage of the drones are now being hit in the air. So the intended damage is much higher and much more sinister than what we see. Afaik, they targeted even Lviv with drones but they were taken out in the air.

    But frankly, I cannot but suspect the motives of outsiders like yourself who harp so much on the atrocity issue and bring it up as an argument that there can be no negotiations at all with Russia

    So you think the atrocities should just be swept under the carpet? There are awful many of them by now. My words that I post here, for the most part, are very closely aligned with what a large percentage of Ukrainians believe (as well as a small group of the Russian nationalists who are on the side of Ukraine and Europe). We have a common outlook.

    that this must end in total Ukrainian victory, no matter the costs,

    No one knows where it will end, but as long as there are men (and women) willing and able to fight and if they receive weapons, it will go on. That’s how it always works. They are being constantly shelled and attacked so they can’t stop. Would you in their position? You wouldn’t defend yourself? Sorry to mention this but they have kids and it’s a perspective that you may not be able to relate to.

    that citizens of the Western states supporting Ukraine have no right no question Ukrainian policies.

    You have a right to question certain things. But there is a fine line. You can question what kind of assistance to deliver and how it is used, but I don’t think you can question internal policies (since the decision has already been made by the West to help). At least not with the paternalistic tone that you do. Things have gone too far and the war needs to run its course now. The Russians chose to be there. When you walk into a country with weapons in your hands in order to murder you have already chosen your destiny.

    Remember, that a large proportion of Westerners, especially in places such as Scandinavia, still support Ukraine. So you are as much against them as you are against us.

    • Replies: @German_reader
    @LatW


    You have a right to question certain things. But there is a fine line. You can question what kind of assistance to deliver and how it is used, but I don’t think you can question internal policies (since the decision has already been made by the West to help).
     
    No, we have the right to question everything, given that our economies are going to be wrecked, we are running a risk of nuclear war, and Ukraine expects long-term subsidies on a massive scale. There is no moral obligation to grant unconditional support under such circumstances. If Ukrainians decide to spit on the liberal "European values" for which they're supposedly fighting according to the propaganda were bombarded with, if they decide to turn this into an ethnic war with all the revenge killings and expulsions this implies, they should look for another sponsor and see where it gets them. A country that dependent on foreign aid doesn't have full sovereignty, full stop.

    Replies: @LatW

    , @Matra
    @LatW

    When you walk into a country with weapons in your hands in order to murder you have already chosen your destiny

    Like when Latvians & the Polish invaded far away Iraq as part of the Coalition of the Willing?

    Replies: @LatW

    , @Yevardian
    @LatW


    So you think the atrocities should just be swept under the carpet? There are awful many of them by now. My words that I post here, for the most part, are very closely aligned with what a large percentage of Ukrainians believe (as well as a small group of the Russian nationalists who are on the side of Ukraine and Europe). We have a common outlook.
     
    Short of an extremely powerful international (((lobby))) with tangible influence on government policy of the world's most powerful countries, resentfully holding on to past grievances out of misplaced pride does nothing for a country.

    Both before and after Armenia trounced Azerbaijan in the First Artsakh War, Ter-Petrosian in his first term tried normalising relations with Turkey. Of course they demanded downgrading the genocide to 'disorganised massacres' taking place in the context of chaotic environment. It was obviously rejected, and there were mass protests against any sort of negotiation at all. But the opportunity should have been taken for concessions while the country held a position of relative strength. The intransigence and tedious focus on the genocide got worse with later presidents.
    If Ukraine's leaders were smart, they'd be realistic enough about letting go of Crimea and Donbass, so they can end this war soon, on terms not totally dictated by foreign powers, allowing for eventual reproachment with Russia. But given the totally maximalist attitude of their largely foreign-owned government, not going to happen... instead recognising the Republic of Ichkeria, very bigbrain.

    It might not be 'fair' but throwing out atrocity claims (true or not), endlessly harping on them, demanding their retribution just doesn't make any sense unless you realistically expect your enemy's unconditional surrender and total capitulation. Never happening short of a NATO-Ukrainian army occupying Moscow.
    That made sense with post-WWII Germany, psychologically broken and dismembered, but notice even Japan refuses any 'full' apology or restitution for its warcrimes, on level with Germany's, perhaps even worse on average. Korea is a rich country now and could let that it go, given now everyone who was involved is dead or wheelchair-bound, but they won't either.

    It sounds paradoxical, but I think this insistence on human rights often makes conflicts and relations worse and harder to heal.

    Replies: @LatW

    , @silviosilver
    @LatW


    You have a right to question certain things. But there is a fine line. You can question what kind of assistance to deliver and how it is used, but I don’t think you can question internal policies (since the decision has already been made by the West to help). At least not with the paternalistic tone that you do. Things have gone too far and the war needs to run its course now. The Russians chose to be there. When you walk into a country with weapons in your hands in order to murder you have already chosen your destiny.
     
    Certainly a pushy bastard, this one.

    Of course, it's very easy to strike such a confident tone when you think you're set to win.

    I expect he'll be singing a very different tune if it turns out he's set to lose.

    Replies: @AnonfromTN, @LatW

  141. @sudden death
    Will indulge into quoting myself, but roughly one year and half ago offered to make some bet:

    Anyway, any bets on who and when will become the first UK PM from former Indian colony – Priti, Rishi or Sajid?
     
    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-153/#comment-4719785

    ofc, it was done half jokingly, but yet here we are now quickly nearing that point of Rishi as the acting official PM becoming reality, lol

    Will it be India getting the revenge and now beginning projecting its power onto UK or banker Sunak will be used just as a vehicle/banner in order to pull nowday Hindus closer into Western camp against China or RF?

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard

    Everybody in the Middle East thought Barak Obama was going to be the greatest thing and the first thing he did was multiply drone bombs in Arab countries by 5X.

    That guy is going to do what the 100 top dogs in Britain tell him to do.

  142. German_reader says:
    @LatW
    @German_reader


    Then why turn the language issue into a loyalty test?
     
    It wouldn't be a loyalty test but more of a security issue for the future. They need more cohesion. So it cannot be used to stir up trouble from outside. Also, I believe the Ukrainians should have the right to decide these things without outsiders interfering. They are themselves switching to Ukrainian. There will de facto be Russian there and Russian will be used as lingua franca in the former Rus space. But given how things are going, the Russophone population will be reduced (most of the ones recently deported are Russian speakers). The problem is that that population will then be used by Russia to create new soldiers to attack Ukraine in the future, so it's especially perverse. But it's nothing new at all. And the areas in the East that could be still liberated will be depopulated and ruined.

    What Russia has done so far in this war isn’t nearly on the same level as what Germans did in 1939-1945.
     
    God forbid it was as bad as that! But it is bad enough, just way too much. Don't assume it will not be taken into account. Things will not go back to how they used to be. This is too big.

    Of course this could easily change in the near future (very ominous statements by Shoigu about Ukraine allegedly building a dirty bomb, one wonders what Russian intentions are here, are they planning something of the sort themselves?)
     
    From what can be gauged through some sources from Russia, Shoigu isn't really in charge anymore. It's also possible that the nuclear issue has been resolved (there have been conversations and warnings from the West). Also, I believe there is a man in Moscow or a group of men, within the security agencies, who could possibly stop it if the "one in the bunker" decided to go that route. I'm sure they will at least try. Ofc, not a given, they may not succeed.

    but so far all this talk about “genocide” etc. is simply propaganda.
     
    I wish it were mere propaganda. One doesn't have to use the word "genocide" but it's clear that Ukraine's population is deliberately being reduced. The irony is that you can just as well call it "genocide against Russian speakers".

    where in many cases it’s probably not even clear to what extent civilian deaths were intentional.

     

    That's just not true. They have been deliberately targeting civilian infrastructure for a while now. A big percentage of the drones are now being hit in the air. So the intended damage is much higher and much more sinister than what we see. Afaik, they targeted even Lviv with drones but they were taken out in the air.

    But frankly, I cannot but suspect the motives of outsiders like yourself who harp so much on the atrocity issue and bring it up as an argument that there can be no negotiations at all with Russia
     
    So you think the atrocities should just be swept under the carpet? There are awful many of them by now. My words that I post here, for the most part, are very closely aligned with what a large percentage of Ukrainians believe (as well as a small group of the Russian nationalists who are on the side of Ukraine and Europe). We have a common outlook.

    that this must end in total Ukrainian victory, no matter the costs,
     
    No one knows where it will end, but as long as there are men (and women) willing and able to fight and if they receive weapons, it will go on. That's how it always works. They are being constantly shelled and attacked so they can't stop. Would you in their position? You wouldn't defend yourself? Sorry to mention this but they have kids and it's a perspective that you may not be able to relate to.

    that citizens of the Western states supporting Ukraine have no right no question Ukrainian policies.

     

    You have a right to question certain things. But there is a fine line. You can question what kind of assistance to deliver and how it is used, but I don't think you can question internal policies (since the decision has already been made by the West to help). At least not with the paternalistic tone that you do. Things have gone too far and the war needs to run its course now. The Russians chose to be there. When you walk into a country with weapons in your hands in order to murder you have already chosen your destiny.

    Remember, that a large proportion of Westerners, especially in places such as Scandinavia, still support Ukraine. So you are as much against them as you are against us.

    Replies: @German_reader, @Matra, @Yevardian, @silviosilver

    You have a right to question certain things. But there is a fine line. You can question what kind of assistance to deliver and how it is used, but I don’t think you can question internal policies (since the decision has already been made by the West to help).

    No, we have the right to question everything, given that our economies are going to be wrecked, we are running a risk of nuclear war, and Ukraine expects long-term subsidies on a massive scale. There is no moral obligation to grant unconditional support under such circumstances. If Ukrainians decide to spit on the liberal “European values” for which they’re supposedly fighting according to the propaganda were bombarded with, if they decide to turn this into an ethnic war with all the revenge killings and expulsions this implies, they should look for another sponsor and see where it gets them. A country that dependent on foreign aid doesn’t have full sovereignty, full stop.

    • Replies: @LatW
    @German_reader

    Of course, I'm not disputing that the situation is quite serious and even dire (probably the worst we've seen in our lives), and, if you so wish, you can continue to hold Ukrainians to a higher ethical standard than you will ever hold Russians to, that is your own complex, but don't expect to not be called out on it.


    There is no moral obligation to grant unconditional support under such circumstances.
     
    As I said, you can question all you want. But you should take it to your own government, instead of trashing Ukrainians who are already having a very rough time.

    Replies: @German_reader

  143. @LatW
    @German_reader


    Then why turn the language issue into a loyalty test?
     
    It wouldn't be a loyalty test but more of a security issue for the future. They need more cohesion. So it cannot be used to stir up trouble from outside. Also, I believe the Ukrainians should have the right to decide these things without outsiders interfering. They are themselves switching to Ukrainian. There will de facto be Russian there and Russian will be used as lingua franca in the former Rus space. But given how things are going, the Russophone population will be reduced (most of the ones recently deported are Russian speakers). The problem is that that population will then be used by Russia to create new soldiers to attack Ukraine in the future, so it's especially perverse. But it's nothing new at all. And the areas in the East that could be still liberated will be depopulated and ruined.

    What Russia has done so far in this war isn’t nearly on the same level as what Germans did in 1939-1945.
     
    God forbid it was as bad as that! But it is bad enough, just way too much. Don't assume it will not be taken into account. Things will not go back to how they used to be. This is too big.

    Of course this could easily change in the near future (very ominous statements by Shoigu about Ukraine allegedly building a dirty bomb, one wonders what Russian intentions are here, are they planning something of the sort themselves?)
     
    From what can be gauged through some sources from Russia, Shoigu isn't really in charge anymore. It's also possible that the nuclear issue has been resolved (there have been conversations and warnings from the West). Also, I believe there is a man in Moscow or a group of men, within the security agencies, who could possibly stop it if the "one in the bunker" decided to go that route. I'm sure they will at least try. Ofc, not a given, they may not succeed.

    but so far all this talk about “genocide” etc. is simply propaganda.
     
    I wish it were mere propaganda. One doesn't have to use the word "genocide" but it's clear that Ukraine's population is deliberately being reduced. The irony is that you can just as well call it "genocide against Russian speakers".

    where in many cases it’s probably not even clear to what extent civilian deaths were intentional.

     

    That's just not true. They have been deliberately targeting civilian infrastructure for a while now. A big percentage of the drones are now being hit in the air. So the intended damage is much higher and much more sinister than what we see. Afaik, they targeted even Lviv with drones but they were taken out in the air.

    But frankly, I cannot but suspect the motives of outsiders like yourself who harp so much on the atrocity issue and bring it up as an argument that there can be no negotiations at all with Russia
     
    So you think the atrocities should just be swept under the carpet? There are awful many of them by now. My words that I post here, for the most part, are very closely aligned with what a large percentage of Ukrainians believe (as well as a small group of the Russian nationalists who are on the side of Ukraine and Europe). We have a common outlook.

    that this must end in total Ukrainian victory, no matter the costs,
     
    No one knows where it will end, but as long as there are men (and women) willing and able to fight and if they receive weapons, it will go on. That's how it always works. They are being constantly shelled and attacked so they can't stop. Would you in their position? You wouldn't defend yourself? Sorry to mention this but they have kids and it's a perspective that you may not be able to relate to.

    that citizens of the Western states supporting Ukraine have no right no question Ukrainian policies.

     

    You have a right to question certain things. But there is a fine line. You can question what kind of assistance to deliver and how it is used, but I don't think you can question internal policies (since the decision has already been made by the West to help). At least not with the paternalistic tone that you do. Things have gone too far and the war needs to run its course now. The Russians chose to be there. When you walk into a country with weapons in your hands in order to murder you have already chosen your destiny.

    Remember, that a large proportion of Westerners, especially in places such as Scandinavia, still support Ukraine. So you are as much against them as you are against us.

    Replies: @German_reader, @Matra, @Yevardian, @silviosilver

    When you walk into a country with weapons in your hands in order to murder you have already chosen your destiny

    Like when Latvians & the Polish invaded far away Iraq as part of the Coalition of the Willing?

    • Replies: @LatW
    @Matra


    Like when Latvians & the Polish invaded far away Iraq as part of the Coalition of the Willing?
     
    Exactly. Since some of them were killed there and then they got on some revenge list from the Muslims. ISIS, I think. And then have to take crap from the likes of you 20 years later, which, imo, is the most terrible punishment. It's better to be threatened by the ISIS than have to deal with German Putinoids.
  144. @German_reader
    @LatW


    Many Russophones are not only loyal, but are among the fiercest fighters for Ukraine.
     
    Then why turn the language issue into a loyalty test?

    And on a more human level, I don’t think I have to remind you that Germans were shunned after 1945 in many places.
     
    What Russia has done so far in this war isn't nearly on the same level as what Germans did in 1939-1945. Of course this could easily change in the near future (very ominous statements by Shoigu about Ukraine allegedly building a dirty bomb, one wonders what Russian intentions are here, are they planning something of the sort themselves?), but so far all this talk about "genocide" etc. is simply propaganda. I do believe that some allegations against Russian troops are true...they probably do arrest Ukrainian civilians they suspect of being anti-Russian, torture them and in some cases at least kill them. This is all very bad, but unfortunately it's not that different from what even democratic Western states have done within living memory (not to mention various Western "allies"). The same applies to an even greater degree to "Russian drones have killed a pregnant woman", where in many cases it's probably not even clear to what extent civilian deaths were intentional.
    Of course it's understandable that Ukrainians are outraged about any of their own casualties, both civilian and military. But frankly, I cannot but suspect the motives of outsiders like yourself who harp so much on the atrocity issue and bring it up as an argument that there can be no negotiations at all with Russia (not even for an imperfect ceasefire, which is probably the only somewhat realistic possibility right now), that this must end in total Ukrainian victory, no matter the costs, and that citizens of the Western states supporting Ukraine have no right no question Ukrainian policies.

    Replies: @LatW, @Yevardian

    (very ominous statements by Shoigu about Ukraine allegedly building a dirty bomb, one wonders what Russian intentions are here, are they planning something of the sort themselves?)

    All these outraged claims from Ukrainians and Russians are tinged with very black humour for me, because whenever one side plausibly asserts the other side is planning on [something awful], you can virtually guarantee it as an indication they’ve also considered it themselves.

    I have no idea which side did Bucha and honestly don’t care. Then the mutual threats of blowing up dams, nuclear powerplants, civilian infrastructure, shared hysterical accusations of genocide etc, etc. It’s all so tiresome…

    • Replies: @German_reader
    @Yevardian


    I have no idea which side did Bucha and honestly don’t care.
     
    tbh the account even in mainstream media like SPIEGEL doesn't seem all that implausible to me (if you filter out some of the moralistic outrage and read somewhat between the lines)...the first Russian column that entered there was shot to pieces, and some civilians took part in the fighting. Frustrated at that setback and paranoid about irregular combatants the Russian troops which came subsequently took to detaining, torturing or just killing any civilians they suspected of being spies for the Ukrainian army or potential partisans. Added to that probably some raping and looting, or some murders just out of boredom and frustration, the sort of thing that happens with ill-disciplined troops. All very ugly, and if the Ukrainians can identify participants they may legitimately hold war crimes trials against them. The issue for me is that such incidents, appalling as they undoubtedly are, are used to argue that any kind of negotiations must be totally out of the question (you can't negotiate with the modern-day equivalent of Hitler after all) and that Ukraine deserves totally unconditional support as a sacred victim of "genocide". imo that's just deeply manipulative and intended to make Ukraine's supporters essentially hostages of Ukrainian domestic politics, which has its fair share of demented hardliners.
    , @LatW
    @Yevardian


    I have no idea which side did Bucha and honestly don’t care. Then the mutual threats of blowing up dams, nuclear powerplants, civilian infrastructure, shared hysterical accusations of genocide etc, etc.
     
    With one very very tiny detail - where is all this horrific "action" taking place? It's not like the Ukrainians created or ever intended to create a massacre on the outskirts of Moscow...
  145. @AP
    @Mikel

    I looked it up and it’s apparently 3.4.

    I looked at the Reddit Dmitry posted about the strange activities. They are indeed bizarre but seem to highlight the importance on fertility not necessarily sex (genital anointing). The Puritans from whom the Mormons sprang engaged in all sorts of bizarre “cult-like” behaviors:



    A typical Massachusetts week would begin in the church, which doubled as the town meeting hall. There were no decorations except a giant staring eye on the pulpit to remind churchgoers that God was watching them. Townspeople would stand up before their and declare their shame and misdeeds, sometimes being forced to literally crawl before the other worshippers begging for forgiveness. Then the minister would give two two-hour sermons back to back

    Everyone was compelled by law to live in families. Town officials would search the town for single people and, if found, order them to join a family; if they refused, they were sent to jail.

    98% of adult Puritan men were married, compared to only 73% of adult Englishmen in general. Women were under special pressure to marry, and a Puritan proverb said that “women dying maids lead apes in Hell”.

    The average family size in Waltham, Massachusetts in the 1730s was 9.7 children.

    Puritan parents traditionally would send children away to be raised with other families, and raise those families’ children in turn, in the hopes that the lack of familiarity would make the child behave better.

    In 1692, 25% of women over age 45 in Essex County were accused of witchcraft.

    Wasting time in Massachusetts was literally a criminal offense, listed in the law code, and several people were in fact prosecuted for it.

    Another law just said “If any man shall exceed the bounds of moderation, we shall punish him severely”.

    Here was have literacy for the purpose of social control:

    Massachusetts passed the first law mandating universal public education, which was called The Old Deluder Satan Law in honor of its preamble, which began “It being one chief project of that old deluder, Satan, to keep men from the knowledge of the scriptures…”

    Replies: @songbird, @John Gruskos

    Thanks for reminding me how awesome colonial America was.

    Prouder than ever to be an American, which is why the American flag is the only flag I will ever fly.

    • LOL: Barbarossa
  146. @Matra
    @LatW

    When you walk into a country with weapons in your hands in order to murder you have already chosen your destiny

    Like when Latvians & the Polish invaded far away Iraq as part of the Coalition of the Willing?

    Replies: @LatW

    Like when Latvians & the Polish invaded far away Iraq as part of the Coalition of the Willing?

    Exactly. Since some of them were killed there and then they got on some revenge list from the Muslims. ISIS, I think. And then have to take crap from the likes of you 20 years later, which, imo, is the most terrible punishment. It’s better to be threatened by the ISIS than have to deal with German Putinoids.

  147. German_reader says:
    @Yevardian
    @German_reader


    (very ominous statements by Shoigu about Ukraine allegedly building a dirty bomb, one wonders what Russian intentions are here, are they planning something of the sort themselves?)
     
    All these outraged claims from Ukrainians and Russians are tinged with very black humour for me, because whenever one side plausibly asserts the other side is planning on [something awful], you can virtually guarantee it as an indication they've also considered it themselves.

    I have no idea which side did Bucha and honestly don't care. Then the mutual threats of blowing up dams, nuclear powerplants, civilian infrastructure, shared hysterical accusations of genocide etc, etc. It's all so tiresome...

    Replies: @German_reader, @LatW

    I have no idea which side did Bucha and honestly don’t care.

    tbh the account even in mainstream media like SPIEGEL doesn’t seem all that implausible to me (if you filter out some of the moralistic outrage and read somewhat between the lines)…the first Russian column that entered there was shot to pieces, and some civilians took part in the fighting. Frustrated at that setback and paranoid about irregular combatants the Russian troops which came subsequently took to detaining, torturing or just killing any civilians they suspected of being spies for the Ukrainian army or potential partisans. Added to that probably some raping and looting, or some murders just out of boredom and frustration, the sort of thing that happens with ill-disciplined troops. All very ugly, and if the Ukrainians can identify participants they may legitimately hold war crimes trials against them. The issue for me is that such incidents, appalling as they undoubtedly are, are used to argue that any kind of negotiations must be totally out of the question (you can’t negotiate with the modern-day equivalent of Hitler after all) and that Ukraine deserves totally unconditional support as a sacred victim of “genocide”. imo that’s just deeply manipulative and intended to make Ukraine’s supporters essentially hostages of Ukrainian domestic politics, which has its fair share of demented hardliners.

    • LOL: LondonBob, LondonBob
  148. @German_reader
    @LatW


    You have a right to question certain things. But there is a fine line. You can question what kind of assistance to deliver and how it is used, but I don’t think you can question internal policies (since the decision has already been made by the West to help).
     
    No, we have the right to question everything, given that our economies are going to be wrecked, we are running a risk of nuclear war, and Ukraine expects long-term subsidies on a massive scale. There is no moral obligation to grant unconditional support under such circumstances. If Ukrainians decide to spit on the liberal "European values" for which they're supposedly fighting according to the propaganda were bombarded with, if they decide to turn this into an ethnic war with all the revenge killings and expulsions this implies, they should look for another sponsor and see where it gets them. A country that dependent on foreign aid doesn't have full sovereignty, full stop.

    Replies: @LatW

    Of course, I’m not disputing that the situation is quite serious and even dire (probably the worst we’ve seen in our lives), and, if you so wish, you can continue to hold Ukrainians to a higher ethical standard than you will ever hold Russians to, that is your own complex, but don’t expect to not be called out on it.

    There is no moral obligation to grant unconditional support under such circumstances.

    As I said, you can question all you want. But you should take it to your own government, instead of trashing Ukrainians who are already having a very rough time.

    • Replies: @German_reader
    @LatW


    than you will ever hold Russians to, that is your own complex
     
    No, it's simply rooted in the fact that Ukraine has gotten very substantial aid from my country (without showing much gratitude for it) and that this support has very negative consequences for my country. It the worst happens, possibly existential ones. I'm not particularly keen on being impoverished, let alone incinerated for any foreign country, but especially not if the military and political leaders of said foreign country make crazy statements about re-taking Crimea or removing the Russian language.
    Honestly, I have to say I'm really stunned by the sense of entitlement that shines through in your comments, as also in those of many Ukrainians. It's like you simply don't understand that other people may have different interests than you and that you should at least make an effort to take those interests into account. No, yours is the side of light and right, and that's all that matters, everyone has to give unconditional support.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

  149. @Yevardian
    @German_reader


    (very ominous statements by Shoigu about Ukraine allegedly building a dirty bomb, one wonders what Russian intentions are here, are they planning something of the sort themselves?)
     
    All these outraged claims from Ukrainians and Russians are tinged with very black humour for me, because whenever one side plausibly asserts the other side is planning on [something awful], you can virtually guarantee it as an indication they've also considered it themselves.

    I have no idea which side did Bucha and honestly don't care. Then the mutual threats of blowing up dams, nuclear powerplants, civilian infrastructure, shared hysterical accusations of genocide etc, etc. It's all so tiresome...

    Replies: @German_reader, @LatW

    I have no idea which side did Bucha and honestly don’t care. Then the mutual threats of blowing up dams, nuclear powerplants, civilian infrastructure, shared hysterical accusations of genocide etc, etc.

    With one very very tiny detail – where is all this horrific “action” taking place? It’s not like the Ukrainians created or ever intended to create a massacre on the outskirts of Moscow…

  150. @LatW
    @German_reader


    Then why turn the language issue into a loyalty test?
     
    It wouldn't be a loyalty test but more of a security issue for the future. They need more cohesion. So it cannot be used to stir up trouble from outside. Also, I believe the Ukrainians should have the right to decide these things without outsiders interfering. They are themselves switching to Ukrainian. There will de facto be Russian there and Russian will be used as lingua franca in the former Rus space. But given how things are going, the Russophone population will be reduced (most of the ones recently deported are Russian speakers). The problem is that that population will then be used by Russia to create new soldiers to attack Ukraine in the future, so it's especially perverse. But it's nothing new at all. And the areas in the East that could be still liberated will be depopulated and ruined.

    What Russia has done so far in this war isn’t nearly on the same level as what Germans did in 1939-1945.
     
    God forbid it was as bad as that! But it is bad enough, just way too much. Don't assume it will not be taken into account. Things will not go back to how they used to be. This is too big.

    Of course this could easily change in the near future (very ominous statements by Shoigu about Ukraine allegedly building a dirty bomb, one wonders what Russian intentions are here, are they planning something of the sort themselves?)
     
    From what can be gauged through some sources from Russia, Shoigu isn't really in charge anymore. It's also possible that the nuclear issue has been resolved (there have been conversations and warnings from the West). Also, I believe there is a man in Moscow or a group of men, within the security agencies, who could possibly stop it if the "one in the bunker" decided to go that route. I'm sure they will at least try. Ofc, not a given, they may not succeed.

    but so far all this talk about “genocide” etc. is simply propaganda.
     
    I wish it were mere propaganda. One doesn't have to use the word "genocide" but it's clear that Ukraine's population is deliberately being reduced. The irony is that you can just as well call it "genocide against Russian speakers".

    where in many cases it’s probably not even clear to what extent civilian deaths were intentional.

     

    That's just not true. They have been deliberately targeting civilian infrastructure for a while now. A big percentage of the drones are now being hit in the air. So the intended damage is much higher and much more sinister than what we see. Afaik, they targeted even Lviv with drones but they were taken out in the air.

    But frankly, I cannot but suspect the motives of outsiders like yourself who harp so much on the atrocity issue and bring it up as an argument that there can be no negotiations at all with Russia
     
    So you think the atrocities should just be swept under the carpet? There are awful many of them by now. My words that I post here, for the most part, are very closely aligned with what a large percentage of Ukrainians believe (as well as a small group of the Russian nationalists who are on the side of Ukraine and Europe). We have a common outlook.

    that this must end in total Ukrainian victory, no matter the costs,
     
    No one knows where it will end, but as long as there are men (and women) willing and able to fight and if they receive weapons, it will go on. That's how it always works. They are being constantly shelled and attacked so they can't stop. Would you in their position? You wouldn't defend yourself? Sorry to mention this but they have kids and it's a perspective that you may not be able to relate to.

    that citizens of the Western states supporting Ukraine have no right no question Ukrainian policies.

     

    You have a right to question certain things. But there is a fine line. You can question what kind of assistance to deliver and how it is used, but I don't think you can question internal policies (since the decision has already been made by the West to help). At least not with the paternalistic tone that you do. Things have gone too far and the war needs to run its course now. The Russians chose to be there. When you walk into a country with weapons in your hands in order to murder you have already chosen your destiny.

    Remember, that a large proportion of Westerners, especially in places such as Scandinavia, still support Ukraine. So you are as much against them as you are against us.

    Replies: @German_reader, @Matra, @Yevardian, @silviosilver

    So you think the atrocities should just be swept under the carpet? There are awful many of them by now. My words that I post here, for the most part, are very closely aligned with what a large percentage of Ukrainians believe (as well as a small group of the Russian nationalists who are on the side of Ukraine and Europe). We have a common outlook.

    Short of an extremely powerful international (((lobby))) with tangible influence on government policy of the world’s most powerful countries, resentfully holding on to past grievances out of misplaced pride does nothing for a country.

    Both before and after Armenia trounced Azerbaijan in the First Artsakh War, Ter-Petrosian in his first term tried normalising relations with Turkey. Of course they demanded downgrading the genocide to ‘disorganised massacres’ taking place in the context of chaotic environment. It was obviously rejected, and there were mass protests against any sort of negotiation at all. But the opportunity should have been taken for concessions while the country held a position of relative strength. The intransigence and tedious focus on the genocide got worse with later presidents.
    If Ukraine’s leaders were smart, they’d be realistic enough about letting go of Crimea and Donbass, so they can end this war soon, on terms not totally dictated by foreign powers, allowing for eventual reproachment with Russia. But given the totally maximalist attitude of their largely foreign-owned government, not going to happen… instead recognising the Republic of Ichkeria, very bigbrain.

    It might not be ‘fair’ but throwing out atrocity claims (true or not), endlessly harping on them, demanding their retribution just doesn’t make any sense unless you realistically expect your enemy’s unconditional surrender and total capitulation. Never happening short of a NATO-Ukrainian army occupying Moscow.
    That made sense with post-WWII Germany, psychologically broken and dismembered, but notice even Japan refuses any ‘full’ apology or restitution for its warcrimes, on level with Germany’s, perhaps even worse on average. Korea is a rich country now and could let that it go, given now everyone who was involved is dead or wheelchair-bound, but they won’t either.

    It sounds paradoxical, but I think this insistence on human rights often makes conflicts and relations worse and harder to heal.

    • Replies: @LatW
    @Yevardian


    resentfully holding on to past grievances out of misplaced pride does nothing for a country.
     
    You either misunderstood me or you're deliberately looking past my point - I wasn't talking about some mysterious "past grievances" but about the killing that is ongoing. The attacks on the civilian infrastructure that are happening right now, as we speak, many Ukrainians have no electricity.

    But the opportunity should have been taken for concessions while the country held a position of relative strength. The intransigence and tedious focus on the genocide got worse with later presidents.
     
    Of course, it is always better to have fewer tensions. But do you think Armenia's position would significantly change just by making those concessions? You do not believe there may be deeper problems under the surface? Or are you thinking that you would just live on hating each other but not encounter a crisis and that would be livable.

    If Ukraine’s leaders were smart, they’d be realistic enough about letting go of Crimea and Donbass, so they can end this war soon, on terms not totally dictated by foreign powers, allowing for eventual reproachment with Russia.
     
    Rapprochement is very difficult to talk about right now, as there are constant attacks being carried out on Ukraine and they will not stop until there is a serious break in the war. The attacks may not even stop if the Russians are pushed out of Kherson, there could be attacks from Belarus (there are Iranian drone specialists in Belarus right now so there could be a drone attack on Western Ukraine). Rapprochement may not happen for a very long time.

    It's too early to talk about Donbas and Crimea. The issue with giving up territory is that, while you do get a frozen conflict, which is better than more deaths, eventually the next generation will be forced to fight again. The Ukrainians do not want to leave this war to their children.

    It might not be ‘fair’ but throwing out atrocity claims (true or not), endlessly harping on them, demanding their retribution just doesn’t make any sense unless you realistically expect your enemy’s unconditional surrender and total capitulation.
     
    In this kind of a thing, you should speak for yourself, because victims deserve justice. It's easy to speak that way about other people's children. If your people were victims, you would be ok to say - let us not seek justice. But do not speak that way about others. The Ukrainians will start with prosecuting those who they can, for crimes that they have already investigated.

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon

  151. German_reader says:
    @LatW
    @German_reader

    Of course, I'm not disputing that the situation is quite serious and even dire (probably the worst we've seen in our lives), and, if you so wish, you can continue to hold Ukrainians to a higher ethical standard than you will ever hold Russians to, that is your own complex, but don't expect to not be called out on it.


    There is no moral obligation to grant unconditional support under such circumstances.
     
    As I said, you can question all you want. But you should take it to your own government, instead of trashing Ukrainians who are already having a very rough time.

    Replies: @German_reader

    than you will ever hold Russians to, that is your own complex

    No, it’s simply rooted in the fact that Ukraine has gotten very substantial aid from my country (without showing much gratitude for it) and that this support has very negative consequences for my country. It the worst happens, possibly existential ones. I’m not particularly keen on being impoverished, let alone incinerated for any foreign country, but especially not if the military and political leaders of said foreign country make crazy statements about re-taking Crimea or removing the Russian language.
    Honestly, I have to say I’m really stunned by the sense of entitlement that shines through in your comments, as also in those of many Ukrainians. It’s like you simply don’t understand that other people may have different interests than you and that you should at least make an effort to take those interests into account. No, yours is the side of light and right, and that’s all that matters, everyone has to give unconditional support.

    • Agree: Matra
    • Thanks: YetAnotherAnon
    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @German_reader

    Ukrainians really are a piece of work as you pointed out. They are giving Poles a run for the money.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

  152. No, it’s simply rooted in the fact that Ukraine has gotten very substantial aid from my country (without showing much gratitude for it) and that this support has very negative consequences for my country.

    All countries that are helping are making a sacrifice. I can understand how sometimes one may not like their tone as it can be intense. Sometimes there is no filter.

    But have you ever thought that all these economic problems actually started before the war in Ukraine? Sure, the war made it much worse now, but the inflation problem, and especially the issue of overpriced housing started much earlier. So there were already structural problems in the global economy that most likely would’ve surfaced in some type of a crisis.

    And don’t pretend your elites didn’t know who Russia was. They just didn’t want to see it. Because it was convenient.

    It’s like you simply don’t understand that other people may have different interests than you

    It’s ok that you have different interests than us. I will certainly keep that in mind going forward. I wish though I had known that we have such differing interests before my family bought that expensive Audi.

    You became very transparent, too, waving the EU flag and poking Ukraine with EU minority legislation (being an AfD voter yourself and despite that Ukraine is not even an EU member and at the time when in your own country centers where Ukrainian refugees live are being burned down, probably either by local Russians or AfD supporters, I understand the situation is tense and that there are way too many of them, but come on… ). It is more than clear now that you, Germans, only use this legislation to control others, not so much because you care about human rights. To be more precise, you may care about human rights and above all stability, but this is definitely an instrument of yours to use to push Eastern Euros around. It should be treated as such. And it’s pretty crazy how someone such as you, who is not the most tolerant person on the planet, would wave this around like that. Nationalism for me, but not for thee. As usual.

    • Replies: @German_reader
    @LatW


    in your own country centers where Ukrainian refugees live are being burned down, probably either by local Russians or AfD supporters
     
    I don't exclude the possibility that this happened, but unless it's proven, it could be just as well a hoax, like many other alleged neo-Nazi attacks here (not that there haven't been acts of violence, even murders, by neo-Nazis, especially in the 1990s and early 2000s, but there is also a long, long history of stories that turned out to be utterly fake, but were nevertheless promoted by the media, to justify the repression against any right-wing opposion, no matter how tame). It's typical though that this is eagerly taken up and made a big stoy by Visegrad 24 and the like, yet more evidence that there is no common ground with the "based" Eastern Euros.

    but this is definitely an instrument of yours to use to push Eastern Euros around.
     
    Then leave. Frankly, as far as the Baltic states are concerned, you are nothing but a huge liability, in retrospect it's absolutely clear that you should have never been admitted to either the EU or to NATO. You contribute nothing of worth, your only function is so that the very worst kind of American hegemonist can point to your statelets as evidence that their preferred policies enjoy support in Europe (which they actually don't among most of the pre-1990 members of NATO, nor among many other Eastern Europeans).

    Nationalism for me, but not for thee.
     
    No, it's exactly the reverse. You think you're entitled to unconditional Western support for your little ethno-projects (including even bizarre larping like "Perun give us strength") and for your manic hatreds, but you make zero effort to consider any wider interests and you readily resort to tactics of moral blackmail which are only reinforcing the ruling narratives. Terrible deal from any perspective.

    Replies: @LatW, @A123, @Dmitry

  153. @Yevardian
    @LatW


    So you think the atrocities should just be swept under the carpet? There are awful many of them by now. My words that I post here, for the most part, are very closely aligned with what a large percentage of Ukrainians believe (as well as a small group of the Russian nationalists who are on the side of Ukraine and Europe). We have a common outlook.
     
    Short of an extremely powerful international (((lobby))) with tangible influence on government policy of the world's most powerful countries, resentfully holding on to past grievances out of misplaced pride does nothing for a country.

    Both before and after Armenia trounced Azerbaijan in the First Artsakh War, Ter-Petrosian in his first term tried normalising relations with Turkey. Of course they demanded downgrading the genocide to 'disorganised massacres' taking place in the context of chaotic environment. It was obviously rejected, and there were mass protests against any sort of negotiation at all. But the opportunity should have been taken for concessions while the country held a position of relative strength. The intransigence and tedious focus on the genocide got worse with later presidents.
    If Ukraine's leaders were smart, they'd be realistic enough about letting go of Crimea and Donbass, so they can end this war soon, on terms not totally dictated by foreign powers, allowing for eventual reproachment with Russia. But given the totally maximalist attitude of their largely foreign-owned government, not going to happen... instead recognising the Republic of Ichkeria, very bigbrain.

    It might not be 'fair' but throwing out atrocity claims (true or not), endlessly harping on them, demanding their retribution just doesn't make any sense unless you realistically expect your enemy's unconditional surrender and total capitulation. Never happening short of a NATO-Ukrainian army occupying Moscow.
    That made sense with post-WWII Germany, psychologically broken and dismembered, but notice even Japan refuses any 'full' apology or restitution for its warcrimes, on level with Germany's, perhaps even worse on average. Korea is a rich country now and could let that it go, given now everyone who was involved is dead or wheelchair-bound, but they won't either.

    It sounds paradoxical, but I think this insistence on human rights often makes conflicts and relations worse and harder to heal.

    Replies: @LatW

    resentfully holding on to past grievances out of misplaced pride does nothing for a country.

    You either misunderstood me or you’re deliberately looking past my point – I wasn’t talking about some mysterious “past grievances” but about the killing that is ongoing. The attacks on the civilian infrastructure that are happening right now, as we speak, many Ukrainians have no electricity.

    But the opportunity should have been taken for concessions while the country held a position of relative strength. The intransigence and tedious focus on the genocide got worse with later presidents.

    Of course, it is always better to have fewer tensions. But do you think Armenia’s position would significantly change just by making those concessions? You do not believe there may be deeper problems under the surface? Or are you thinking that you would just live on hating each other but not encounter a crisis and that would be livable.

    If Ukraine’s leaders were smart, they’d be realistic enough about letting go of Crimea and Donbass, so they can end this war soon, on terms not totally dictated by foreign powers, allowing for eventual reproachment with Russia.

    Rapprochement is very difficult to talk about right now, as there are constant attacks being carried out on Ukraine and they will not stop until there is a serious break in the war. The attacks may not even stop if the Russians are pushed out of Kherson, there could be attacks from Belarus (there are Iranian drone specialists in Belarus right now so there could be a drone attack on Western Ukraine). Rapprochement may not happen for a very long time.

    It’s too early to talk about Donbas and Crimea. The issue with giving up territory is that, while you do get a frozen conflict, which is better than more deaths, eventually the next generation will be forced to fight again. The Ukrainians do not want to leave this war to their children.

    It might not be ‘fair’ but throwing out atrocity claims (true or not), endlessly harping on them, demanding their retribution just doesn’t make any sense unless you realistically expect your enemy’s unconditional surrender and total capitulation.

    In this kind of a thing, you should speak for yourself, because victims deserve justice. It’s easy to speak that way about other people’s children. If your people were victims, you would be ok to say – let us not seek justice. But do not speak that way about others. The Ukrainians will start with prosecuting those who they can, for crimes that they have already investigated.

    • Agree: Mr. Hack
    • Replies: @YetAnotherAnon
    @LatW


    " victims deserve justice. It’s easy to speak that way about other people’s children. If your people were victims, you would be ok to say – let us not seek justice. But do not speak that way about others. "
     
    Lots of peoples have been victims of war crimes and have not sought justice. The children of Germany and Japan for starters.

    https://i.postimg.cc/9MLdCRDT/Bundesarchiv-Bild-146-1979-025-19-A-Koeln-Kinderleichen-nach-Luftangriff.jpg


    On a a less sombre but still pretty important note, I can't believe Germany is so passive, as their "allies" sever their energy arteries then stop them investigating the crime - a crime which could justify retribution.

    https://cdn.locals.com/images/posts/originals/1987197/1987197_wl6tkn5myax6kup.jpeg

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @Matra, @LatW

  154. German_reader says:
    @LatW

    No, it’s simply rooted in the fact that Ukraine has gotten very substantial aid from my country (without showing much gratitude for it) and that this support has very negative consequences for my country.
     
    All countries that are helping are making a sacrifice. I can understand how sometimes one may not like their tone as it can be intense. Sometimes there is no filter.

    But have you ever thought that all these economic problems actually started before the war in Ukraine? Sure, the war made it much worse now, but the inflation problem, and especially the issue of overpriced housing started much earlier. So there were already structural problems in the global economy that most likely would've surfaced in some type of a crisis.

    And don't pretend your elites didn't know who Russia was. They just didn't want to see it. Because it was convenient.

    It’s like you simply don’t understand that other people may have different interests than you
     
    It's ok that you have different interests than us. I will certainly keep that in mind going forward. I wish though I had known that we have such differing interests before my family bought that expensive Audi.

    You became very transparent, too, waving the EU flag and poking Ukraine with EU minority legislation (being an AfD voter yourself and despite that Ukraine is not even an EU member and at the time when in your own country centers where Ukrainian refugees live are being burned down, probably either by local Russians or AfD supporters, I understand the situation is tense and that there are way too many of them, but come on... ). It is more than clear now that you, Germans, only use this legislation to control others, not so much because you care about human rights. To be more precise, you may care about human rights and above all stability, but this is definitely an instrument of yours to use to push Eastern Euros around. It should be treated as such. And it's pretty crazy how someone such as you, who is not the most tolerant person on the planet, would wave this around like that. Nationalism for me, but not for thee. As usual.

    Replies: @German_reader

    in your own country centers where Ukrainian refugees live are being burned down, probably either by local Russians or AfD supporters

    I don’t exclude the possibility that this happened, but unless it’s proven, it could be just as well a hoax, like many other alleged neo-Nazi attacks here (not that there haven’t been acts of violence, even murders, by neo-Nazis, especially in the 1990s and early 2000s, but there is also a long, long history of stories that turned out to be utterly fake, but were nevertheless promoted by the media, to justify the repression against any right-wing opposion, no matter how tame). It’s typical though that this is eagerly taken up and made a big stoy by Visegrad 24 and the like, yet more evidence that there is no common ground with the “based” Eastern Euros.

    but this is definitely an instrument of yours to use to push Eastern Euros around.

    Then leave. Frankly, as far as the Baltic states are concerned, you are nothing but a huge liability, in retrospect it’s absolutely clear that you should have never been admitted to either the EU or to NATO. You contribute nothing of worth, your only function is so that the very worst kind of American hegemonist can point to your statelets as evidence that their preferred policies enjoy support in Europe (which they actually don’t among most of the pre-1990 members of NATO, nor among many other Eastern Europeans).

    Nationalism for me, but not for thee.

    No, it’s exactly the reverse. You think you’re entitled to unconditional Western support for your little ethno-projects (including even bizarre larping like “Perun give us strength”) and for your manic hatreds, but you make zero effort to consider any wider interests and you readily resort to tactics of moral blackmail which are only reinforcing the ruling narratives. Terrible deal from any perspective.

    • Replies: @LatW
    @German_reader


    It’s typical though that this is eagerly taken up and made a big stoy by Visegrad 24 and the like, yet more evidence that there is no common ground with the “based” Eastern Euros.
     
    Normally I wouldn't criticize AfD, but it sounds like you want to be hostile. Why would it be a fake?? It's totally believable, I saw an AfD guy attack a chick with a flag of Ukraine. Who does that, burn down a whole house and endanger people...

    I don't even blame far-right Germans for being angry, it's a tense situation all across, one shouldn't be pushed to accept foreigners. I just don't see how one can take it out on the vulnerable. If you're unhappy with this you should take it to your own structures and your own countrymen instead of constantly shitting on Ukrainians.


    You think you’re entitled to unconditional Western support for your little ethno-projects (including even bizarre larping like “Perun give us strength”)
     
    I don't support mainstream politics, btw. In the politics that I advocate, Western support may not be needed.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @A123

    , @A123
    @German_reader



    but this is definitely an instrument of yours to use to push Eastern Euros around.
     
    Then leave. Frankly, as far as the Baltic states are concerned, you are nothing but a huge liability, in retrospect it’s absolutely clear that you should have never been admitted to either the EU
     
    How is leaving the EU a practical option for a small nation?

    Look at the abuse and chaos the EU has maliciously inflicted on the UK over BREXIT.

    Small nations have to maintain their national veto as a check against Brussels aggression. Poland and Hungary are diametrically opposed on Ukraine, but both governments have made it clear that they will support each others veto power.

    Germany does not like being part of a Union composed of sovereign equals. If anyone should leave it is Germany.
    ___

    More realistically. All member nations should agree that the EU/EZ is a failure. There is no hope for reform:

    • Populist nations, including Italy and Austria, want to devolve power out of Brussels.
    • SJW Globalist nations, notably Germany, want to increase Brussels 'liberal authoritarianism'.

    Every year it becomes more and more dysfunctional. Dissolving the EU/EZ in a coordinated manner would allow everyone a clean start. The alternative is to keep escalating internal tension until the system catastrophically fails. Meloni has no choice other than following through on her coalition's platform planks:

    ♦ Unless the EU finds a creative way to capitulate, a showdown over migrants is coming.
    ♦ Italian debt is denominated in €uros. And, the German ECB in Frankfurt cannot bully austerity on a country that can fight back.

    Italy can openly defy SJW Globalism. What can the EU/EZ do to reign in a EURO country?

    PEACE 😇

     
    https://www.brainyquote.com/photos_tr/en/j/jpaulgetty/129274/jpaulgetty2-2x.jpg

    Replies: @LatW

    , @Dmitry
    @German_reader

    Lol the danger of writing German as the first word of your username. Now for all your internet life, foreigners will interact with you as the representative of the German nation or the German government.

    And after time you couldn't avoid it. There is statement to "LatW" to exit the EU, like we are seeing important decisions about the future of Latvia from a difficult discussion between Olaf Scholz and (I have to search for the leader of Latvia) Egils Levits.

  155. @German_reader
    @LatW


    in your own country centers where Ukrainian refugees live are being burned down, probably either by local Russians or AfD supporters
     
    I don't exclude the possibility that this happened, but unless it's proven, it could be just as well a hoax, like many other alleged neo-Nazi attacks here (not that there haven't been acts of violence, even murders, by neo-Nazis, especially in the 1990s and early 2000s, but there is also a long, long history of stories that turned out to be utterly fake, but were nevertheless promoted by the media, to justify the repression against any right-wing opposion, no matter how tame). It's typical though that this is eagerly taken up and made a big stoy by Visegrad 24 and the like, yet more evidence that there is no common ground with the "based" Eastern Euros.

    but this is definitely an instrument of yours to use to push Eastern Euros around.
     
    Then leave. Frankly, as far as the Baltic states are concerned, you are nothing but a huge liability, in retrospect it's absolutely clear that you should have never been admitted to either the EU or to NATO. You contribute nothing of worth, your only function is so that the very worst kind of American hegemonist can point to your statelets as evidence that their preferred policies enjoy support in Europe (which they actually don't among most of the pre-1990 members of NATO, nor among many other Eastern Europeans).

    Nationalism for me, but not for thee.
     
    No, it's exactly the reverse. You think you're entitled to unconditional Western support for your little ethno-projects (including even bizarre larping like "Perun give us strength") and for your manic hatreds, but you make zero effort to consider any wider interests and you readily resort to tactics of moral blackmail which are only reinforcing the ruling narratives. Terrible deal from any perspective.

    Replies: @LatW, @A123, @Dmitry

    It’s typical though that this is eagerly taken up and made a big stoy by Visegrad 24 and the like, yet more evidence that there is no common ground with the “based” Eastern Euros.

    Normally I wouldn’t criticize AfD, but it sounds like you want to be hostile. Why would it be a fake?? It’s totally believable, I saw an AfD guy attack a chick with a flag of Ukraine. Who does that, burn down a whole house and endanger people…

    I don’t even blame far-right Germans for being angry, it’s a tense situation all across, one shouldn’t be pushed to accept foreigners. I just don’t see how one can take it out on the vulnerable. If you’re unhappy with this you should take it to your own structures and your own countrymen instead of constantly shitting on Ukrainians.

    You think you’re entitled to unconditional Western support for your little ethno-projects (including even bizarre larping like “Perun give us strength”)

    I don’t support mainstream politics, btw. In the politics that I advocate, Western support may not be needed.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @LatW

    i'm pretty sure the Germans are subsidizing Ukraine at the moment. Whether they like it or not.

    Replies: @LatW

    , @A123
    @LatW


    Normally I wouldn’t criticize AfD
    ...
    I don’t even blame far-right Germans for being angry, it’s a tense situation all across, one shouldn’t be pushed to accept foreigners.

     
    Why characterize the desire to protect Christians as "far-right". What AfD, and other center Populist movement wants is an end to the "ultra-left".

    For example: (1)

    A Somali culture-enricher went on a stabbing rampage in the German city of Ludwigshafen, killing two people.

    It turns out that the young miscreant was one of those engineers, doctors, and symbolic analysts welcomed into the country by Angela Merkel during the Great Migration Crisis of 2015.

    Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Junge Freiheit:

    Somali knife killer arrived in 2015 as an asylum seeker

    The Somali knifeman from Ludwigshafen came to Germany as an illegal immigrant in 2015. He was then recognized as a refugee and was already known to the police for causing bodily harm, reports the Bild newspaper.

    Meanwhile, shocking new details about the attack continue to emerge. The father of the 20-year-old victim apparently had to watch as his son died, bleeding, before his eyes. “I’ve never seen anyone cry so bitterly,” a witness told the newspaper.

    AfD: One in five Somalis is a suspect

    According to the police, the Somali used a 30 centimeter knife to massacre his victims. “Several witnesses reported that the assailant shouted ‘Allahu Akhbar’, among other slogans, during the attack. As a result, extensive investigations into the motive and background are being carried out,” said the police and public prosecutor. Nevertheless, there is no evidence of an Islamist or terrorist background.

    According to the AfD, there has been a massive crime problem with Somalis in Rhineland-Palatinate for a long time. “Several inquiries from our parliamentary group have shown that immigrants are way overrepresented in the police crime statistics, especially in the case of knife attacks, other violent crimes and sexual offenses, in comparison with the local population,” said Jan Bollinger, spokesman for domestic affairs for the AfD parliamentary group in Rhineland-Palatinate.

    “Particularly striking are Somali, Afghan and Syrian citizens, who are pouring into our country again in large numbers right now,” emphasized the AfD politician. Statistically, about one in five male Somalis is a suspect in at least one crime in the state. Bollinger called for an immediate end to illegal migration to Germany.
     

     
    Centrist Germans, including AfD, need to stand up against the extremism of Scholz/Merkel.

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://gatesofvienna.net/2022/10/somali-knife-jihadi-was-from-the-class-of-2015/

    Replies: @LatW, @songbird

  156. @Barbarossa
    @sher singh

    It was just a throw away pun you know. I couldn't resist that deities was spelled dieties.

    Hanging with too many poop stirrers and retards at the Discord seems to have made you a little uptight. It sounds like an unbelievable idiotic time over there. Thanks for reporting on it so we don't have to find out personally!


    Your preferences are shaped by those who took your foreskin

     

    Celts have been eating cattle and pork long before any circumcision. Don't worry though, I don't believe in circumcision myself anyhow and have butcher dates in the next couple of weeks for a pair of oinkers and a troublesome bull calf.

    But we've covered that ground already and will have to agree to disagree!

    Replies: @Sher Singh

    We’ll kill to protect the cow.
    You won’t kill to practice cow slaughter.

    The result’s already decided, Guru’s Hukam is final.

    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ

    • Replies: @Barbarossa
    @Sher Singh

    In all honesty, the prospect of a bunch of Sikhs taking over and keeping me from eating beef ranks about on par with Martian invasion on the list of things I'm realistically concerned about. I'll be happy to raise the threat assessment once you guys have solidified control of the Indian subcontinent.

    Replies: @sher singh, @Mikel, @Thulean Friend

  157. @LatW
    @German_reader


    It’s typical though that this is eagerly taken up and made a big stoy by Visegrad 24 and the like, yet more evidence that there is no common ground with the “based” Eastern Euros.
     
    Normally I wouldn't criticize AfD, but it sounds like you want to be hostile. Why would it be a fake?? It's totally believable, I saw an AfD guy attack a chick with a flag of Ukraine. Who does that, burn down a whole house and endanger people...

    I don't even blame far-right Germans for being angry, it's a tense situation all across, one shouldn't be pushed to accept foreigners. I just don't see how one can take it out on the vulnerable. If you're unhappy with this you should take it to your own structures and your own countrymen instead of constantly shitting on Ukrainians.


    You think you’re entitled to unconditional Western support for your little ethno-projects (including even bizarre larping like “Perun give us strength”)
     
    I don't support mainstream politics, btw. In the politics that I advocate, Western support may not be needed.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @A123

    i’m pretty sure the Germans are subsidizing Ukraine at the moment. Whether they like it or not.

    • Replies: @LatW
    @Wokechoke

    Most of the help is from the US. Don't forget others (Poland, Czech, Canada, etc).

  158. @German_reader
    @LatW


    than you will ever hold Russians to, that is your own complex
     
    No, it's simply rooted in the fact that Ukraine has gotten very substantial aid from my country (without showing much gratitude for it) and that this support has very negative consequences for my country. It the worst happens, possibly existential ones. I'm not particularly keen on being impoverished, let alone incinerated for any foreign country, but especially not if the military and political leaders of said foreign country make crazy statements about re-taking Crimea or removing the Russian language.
    Honestly, I have to say I'm really stunned by the sense of entitlement that shines through in your comments, as also in those of many Ukrainians. It's like you simply don't understand that other people may have different interests than you and that you should at least make an effort to take those interests into account. No, yours is the side of light and right, and that's all that matters, everyone has to give unconditional support.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    Ukrainians really are a piece of work as you pointed out. They are giving Poles a run for the money.

    • Agree: Mikhail
    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @Wokechoke

    So, what royal lineage do you represent Cokechoke? I mean, if you're not too embarrassed to reveal the truth about yourself?

    https://images.cartoonstock.com/lowres/politics-nick_anderson_s_editorial_cartoons-superbowl-bowl-watching-tv-EC107283_low.jpg

  159. Western Europe is a hostage.

    • Replies: @AnonfromTN
    @Wokechoke

    A hostage with severe Stockholm syndrome

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard

  160. @Wokechoke
    @LatW

    i'm pretty sure the Germans are subsidizing Ukraine at the moment. Whether they like it or not.

    Replies: @LatW

    Most of the help is from the US. Don’t forget others (Poland, Czech, Canada, etc).

  161. @German_reader
    @LatW


    in your own country centers where Ukrainian refugees live are being burned down, probably either by local Russians or AfD supporters
     
    I don't exclude the possibility that this happened, but unless it's proven, it could be just as well a hoax, like many other alleged neo-Nazi attacks here (not that there haven't been acts of violence, even murders, by neo-Nazis, especially in the 1990s and early 2000s, but there is also a long, long history of stories that turned out to be utterly fake, but were nevertheless promoted by the media, to justify the repression against any right-wing opposion, no matter how tame). It's typical though that this is eagerly taken up and made a big stoy by Visegrad 24 and the like, yet more evidence that there is no common ground with the "based" Eastern Euros.

    but this is definitely an instrument of yours to use to push Eastern Euros around.
     
    Then leave. Frankly, as far as the Baltic states are concerned, you are nothing but a huge liability, in retrospect it's absolutely clear that you should have never been admitted to either the EU or to NATO. You contribute nothing of worth, your only function is so that the very worst kind of American hegemonist can point to your statelets as evidence that their preferred policies enjoy support in Europe (which they actually don't among most of the pre-1990 members of NATO, nor among many other Eastern Europeans).

    Nationalism for me, but not for thee.
     
    No, it's exactly the reverse. You think you're entitled to unconditional Western support for your little ethno-projects (including even bizarre larping like "Perun give us strength") and for your manic hatreds, but you make zero effort to consider any wider interests and you readily resort to tactics of moral blackmail which are only reinforcing the ruling narratives. Terrible deal from any perspective.

    Replies: @LatW, @A123, @Dmitry

    but this is definitely an instrument of yours to use to push Eastern Euros around.

    Then leave. Frankly, as far as the Baltic states are concerned, you are nothing but a huge liability, in retrospect it’s absolutely clear that you should have never been admitted to either the EU

    How is leaving the EU a practical option for a small nation?

    Look at the abuse and chaos the EU has maliciously inflicted on the UK over BREXIT.

    Small nations have to maintain their national veto as a check against Brussels aggression. Poland and Hungary are diametrically opposed on Ukraine, but both governments have made it clear that they will support each others veto power.

    Germany does not like being part of a Union composed of sovereign equals. If anyone should leave it is Germany.
    ___

    More realistically. All member nations should agree that the EU/EZ is a failure. There is no hope for reform:

    • Populist nations, including Italy and Austria, want to devolve power out of Brussels.
    • SJW Globalist nations, notably Germany, want to increase Brussels ‘liberal authoritarianism’.

    Every year it becomes more and more dysfunctional. Dissolving the EU/EZ in a coordinated manner would allow everyone a clean start. The alternative is to keep escalating internal tension until the system catastrophically fails. Meloni has no choice other than following through on her coalition’s platform planks:

    ♦ Unless the EU finds a creative way to capitulate, a showdown over migrants is coming.
    ♦ Italian debt is denominated in €uros. And, the German ECB in Frankfurt cannot bully austerity on a country that can fight back.

    Italy can openly defy SJW Globalism. What can the EU/EZ do to reign in a EURO country?

    PEACE 😇

     

    • Replies: @LatW
    @A123

    German_reader is under the impression that Swedish & German banks would be eager to leave the Baltics. What a naive young man, hahaha!

  162. @A123
    @German_reader



    but this is definitely an instrument of yours to use to push Eastern Euros around.
     
    Then leave. Frankly, as far as the Baltic states are concerned, you are nothing but a huge liability, in retrospect it’s absolutely clear that you should have never been admitted to either the EU
     
    How is leaving the EU a practical option for a small nation?

    Look at the abuse and chaos the EU has maliciously inflicted on the UK over BREXIT.

    Small nations have to maintain their national veto as a check against Brussels aggression. Poland and Hungary are diametrically opposed on Ukraine, but both governments have made it clear that they will support each others veto power.

    Germany does not like being part of a Union composed of sovereign equals. If anyone should leave it is Germany.
    ___

    More realistically. All member nations should agree that the EU/EZ is a failure. There is no hope for reform:

    • Populist nations, including Italy and Austria, want to devolve power out of Brussels.
    • SJW Globalist nations, notably Germany, want to increase Brussels 'liberal authoritarianism'.

    Every year it becomes more and more dysfunctional. Dissolving the EU/EZ in a coordinated manner would allow everyone a clean start. The alternative is to keep escalating internal tension until the system catastrophically fails. Meloni has no choice other than following through on her coalition's platform planks:

    ♦ Unless the EU finds a creative way to capitulate, a showdown over migrants is coming.
    ♦ Italian debt is denominated in €uros. And, the German ECB in Frankfurt cannot bully austerity on a country that can fight back.

    Italy can openly defy SJW Globalism. What can the EU/EZ do to reign in a EURO country?

    PEACE 😇

     
    https://www.brainyquote.com/photos_tr/en/j/jpaulgetty/129274/jpaulgetty2-2x.jpg

    Replies: @LatW

    German_reader is under the impression that Swedish & German banks would be eager to leave the Baltics. What a naive young man, hahaha!

  163. @LatW
    @German_reader


    It’s typical though that this is eagerly taken up and made a big stoy by Visegrad 24 and the like, yet more evidence that there is no common ground with the “based” Eastern Euros.
     
    Normally I wouldn't criticize AfD, but it sounds like you want to be hostile. Why would it be a fake?? It's totally believable, I saw an AfD guy attack a chick with a flag of Ukraine. Who does that, burn down a whole house and endanger people...

    I don't even blame far-right Germans for being angry, it's a tense situation all across, one shouldn't be pushed to accept foreigners. I just don't see how one can take it out on the vulnerable. If you're unhappy with this you should take it to your own structures and your own countrymen instead of constantly shitting on Ukrainians.


    You think you’re entitled to unconditional Western support for your little ethno-projects (including even bizarre larping like “Perun give us strength”)
     
    I don't support mainstream politics, btw. In the politics that I advocate, Western support may not be needed.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @A123

    Normally I wouldn’t criticize AfD

    I don’t even blame far-right Germans for being angry, it’s a tense situation all across, one shouldn’t be pushed to accept foreigners.

    Why characterize the desire to protect Christians as “far-right”. What AfD, and other center Populist movement wants is an end to the “ultra-left”.

    For example: (1)

    A Somali culture-enricher went on a stabbing rampage in the German city of Ludwigshafen, killing two people.

    It turns out that the young miscreant was one of those engineers, doctors, and symbolic analysts welcomed into the country by Angela Merkel during the Great Migration Crisis of 2015.

    Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Junge Freiheit:

    Somali knife killer arrived in 2015 as an asylum seeker

    The Somali knifeman from Ludwigshafen came to Germany as an illegal immigrant in 2015. He was then recognized as a refugee and was already known to the police for causing bodily harm, reports the Bild newspaper.

    Meanwhile, shocking new details about the attack continue to emerge. The father of the 20-year-old victim apparently had to watch as his son died, bleeding, before his eyes. “I’ve never seen anyone cry so bitterly,” a witness told the newspaper.

    AfD: One in five Somalis is a suspect

    According to the police, the Somali used a 30 centimeter knife to massacre his victims. “Several witnesses reported that the assailant shouted ‘Allahu Akhbar’, among other slogans, during the attack. As a result, extensive investigations into the motive and background are being carried out,” said the police and public prosecutor. Nevertheless, there is no evidence of an Islamist or terrorist background.

    According to the AfD, there has been a massive crime problem with Somalis in Rhineland-Palatinate for a long time. “Several inquiries from our parliamentary group have shown that immigrants are way overrepresented in the police crime statistics, especially in the case of knife attacks, other violent crimes and sexual offenses, in comparison with the local population,” said Jan Bollinger, spokesman for domestic affairs for the AfD parliamentary group in Rhineland-Palatinate.

    “Particularly striking are Somali, Afghan and Syrian citizens, who are pouring into our country again in large numbers right now,” emphasized the AfD politician. Statistically, about one in five male Somalis is a suspect in at least one crime in the state. Bollinger called for an immediate end to illegal migration to Germany.

    Centrist Germans, including AfD, need to stand up against the extremism of Scholz/Merkel.

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://gatesofvienna.net/2022/10/somali-knife-jihadi-was-from-the-class-of-2015/

    • Replies: @LatW
    @A123

    I have read this crap over and over for more than 15 years now, it is all the same and nothing changes!

    But, yea, let's go and burn some Ukrainian refugees in their sleep. That's gonna solve the Somali problem.

    "He was then recognized as a refugee and was already known to the police for causing bodily harm, reports the Bild newspaper."

    Really? Again? Just like the one who stabbed the tranny, was to be deported, should've been taken straight to the airport but wasn't... Ok...

    , @songbird
    @A123

    Seems highly plausible to me that Somalis in the West use up more tax money annually than the GDP of Somalia.

    Is there another such group? Though, to be fair, they have no natural resources.

    Anyway, thinking about Somalis, it is hard to believe that nobody will ever try to send theirs back. Frankly, I don't believe it.

    IMO, it's just awaiting a severe economic crunch, and a subsequent change in the idea of what constitutes a citizen.

  164. @A123
    @LatW


    Normally I wouldn’t criticize AfD
    ...
    I don’t even blame far-right Germans for being angry, it’s a tense situation all across, one shouldn’t be pushed to accept foreigners.

     
    Why characterize the desire to protect Christians as "far-right". What AfD, and other center Populist movement wants is an end to the "ultra-left".

    For example: (1)

    A Somali culture-enricher went on a stabbing rampage in the German city of Ludwigshafen, killing two people.

    It turns out that the young miscreant was one of those engineers, doctors, and symbolic analysts welcomed into the country by Angela Merkel during the Great Migration Crisis of 2015.

    Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Junge Freiheit:

    Somali knife killer arrived in 2015 as an asylum seeker

    The Somali knifeman from Ludwigshafen came to Germany as an illegal immigrant in 2015. He was then recognized as a refugee and was already known to the police for causing bodily harm, reports the Bild newspaper.

    Meanwhile, shocking new details about the attack continue to emerge. The father of the 20-year-old victim apparently had to watch as his son died, bleeding, before his eyes. “I’ve never seen anyone cry so bitterly,” a witness told the newspaper.

    AfD: One in five Somalis is a suspect

    According to the police, the Somali used a 30 centimeter knife to massacre his victims. “Several witnesses reported that the assailant shouted ‘Allahu Akhbar’, among other slogans, during the attack. As a result, extensive investigations into the motive and background are being carried out,” said the police and public prosecutor. Nevertheless, there is no evidence of an Islamist or terrorist background.

    According to the AfD, there has been a massive crime problem with Somalis in Rhineland-Palatinate for a long time. “Several inquiries from our parliamentary group have shown that immigrants are way overrepresented in the police crime statistics, especially in the case of knife attacks, other violent crimes and sexual offenses, in comparison with the local population,” said Jan Bollinger, spokesman for domestic affairs for the AfD parliamentary group in Rhineland-Palatinate.

    “Particularly striking are Somali, Afghan and Syrian citizens, who are pouring into our country again in large numbers right now,” emphasized the AfD politician. Statistically, about one in five male Somalis is a suspect in at least one crime in the state. Bollinger called for an immediate end to illegal migration to Germany.
     

     
    Centrist Germans, including AfD, need to stand up against the extremism of Scholz/Merkel.

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://gatesofvienna.net/2022/10/somali-knife-jihadi-was-from-the-class-of-2015/

    Replies: @LatW, @songbird

    I have read this crap over and over for more than 15 years now, it is all the same and nothing changes!

    But, yea, let’s go and burn some Ukrainian refugees in their sleep. That’s gonna solve the Somali problem.

    “He was then recognized as a refugee and was already known to the police for causing bodily harm, reports the Bild newspaper.”

    Really? Again? Just like the one who stabbed the tranny, was to be deported, should’ve been taken straight to the airport but wasn’t… Ok…

  165. @German_reader
    @AP

    Ukraine is a signatory to this:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Charter_for_Regional_or_Minority_Languages
    imo Ukraine should avoid anything that looks like repression of the Russian language, but it's of course their decision. Don't be surprised though if it costs Ukraine its sympathies among liberals who think Ukraine is fighting for "European values".

    Replies: @LatW, @AnonfromTN

    Ukrainian regime is not agreement-capable. Ukraine signed Minsk, then Minsk-2, and never fulfilled any of its obligations. Takes after its puppeteers: the US signed a nuclear agreement with Iran…

    • Replies: @A123
    @AnonfromTN


    Takes after its puppeteers: the US
     
    Not-The-President Biden is the puppet. Not the other way around.

    Right now, the U.S. could not puppeteer a Punch & Judy skit.


    nuclear agreement with Iran
     
    I did not know that Iran was running Ukie-stan, though that does makes sense.

    After all, it is 100% proven fact that Khamenei abrogated the JCPOA deal while Obama was still in office. Oath Breaking is predictable behaviour for Persian Shias and Ukie Maximalists.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

  166. @Wokechoke
    Western Europe is a hostage.

    Replies: @AnonfromTN

    A hostage with severe Stockholm syndrome

    • Agree: Mikhail
    • Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
    @AnonfromTN

    In the words of Victoria Nuland, fuck the EU!

    Sorry. This whole thing is disgraceful and if Johnson and Macron had two grams of self respect in their bones they would suicide bomb a bank owner.

  167. @AnonfromTN
    @German_reader

    Ukrainian regime is not agreement-capable. Ukraine signed Minsk, then Minsk-2, and never fulfilled any of its obligations. Takes after its puppeteers: the US signed a nuclear agreement with Iran…

    Replies: @A123

    Takes after its puppeteers: the US

    Not-The-President Biden is the puppet. Not the other way around.

    Right now, the U.S. could not puppeteer a Punch & Judy skit.

    nuclear agreement with Iran

    I did not know that Iran was running Ukie-stan, though that does makes sense.

    After all, it is 100% proven fact that Khamenei abrogated the JCPOA deal while Obama was still in office. Oath Breaking is predictable behaviour for Persian Shias and Ukie Maximalists.

    PEACE 😇

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @A123


    I did not know that Iran was running Ukie-stan, though that does makes sense.
     
    Iran running Ukraine? You really are 100% a strange conspiracy nutter.

    https://www.toonpool.com/user/82/files/iran_downs_ukrainian_flight__3503455.jpg

    Replies: @Mikhail

  168. Homosexual propagandist, working in antifa Kremlin media calls for drowning and burning of UA kids:

    tbf, Simonyan herself sort of publicly condemned him too after this, so this might have been off the script improvisation to the tune of current moods, but only if it was not pre-recorded, which is not very clear atm

    • Replies: @AnonfromTN
    @sudden death

    Why stop at half-truth, and not tell the whole story? Right after this personage made his Ukie-style remarks RT stopped working with this scum. This was announced by Simonyan.

    Replies: @sudden death

  169. @LatW
    @German_reader


    Then why turn the language issue into a loyalty test?
     
    It wouldn't be a loyalty test but more of a security issue for the future. They need more cohesion. So it cannot be used to stir up trouble from outside. Also, I believe the Ukrainians should have the right to decide these things without outsiders interfering. They are themselves switching to Ukrainian. There will de facto be Russian there and Russian will be used as lingua franca in the former Rus space. But given how things are going, the Russophone population will be reduced (most of the ones recently deported are Russian speakers). The problem is that that population will then be used by Russia to create new soldiers to attack Ukraine in the future, so it's especially perverse. But it's nothing new at all. And the areas in the East that could be still liberated will be depopulated and ruined.

    What Russia has done so far in this war isn’t nearly on the same level as what Germans did in 1939-1945.
     
    God forbid it was as bad as that! But it is bad enough, just way too much. Don't assume it will not be taken into account. Things will not go back to how they used to be. This is too big.

    Of course this could easily change in the near future (very ominous statements by Shoigu about Ukraine allegedly building a dirty bomb, one wonders what Russian intentions are here, are they planning something of the sort themselves?)
     
    From what can be gauged through some sources from Russia, Shoigu isn't really in charge anymore. It's also possible that the nuclear issue has been resolved (there have been conversations and warnings from the West). Also, I believe there is a man in Moscow or a group of men, within the security agencies, who could possibly stop it if the "one in the bunker" decided to go that route. I'm sure they will at least try. Ofc, not a given, they may not succeed.

    but so far all this talk about “genocide” etc. is simply propaganda.
     
    I wish it were mere propaganda. One doesn't have to use the word "genocide" but it's clear that Ukraine's population is deliberately being reduced. The irony is that you can just as well call it "genocide against Russian speakers".

    where in many cases it’s probably not even clear to what extent civilian deaths were intentional.

     

    That's just not true. They have been deliberately targeting civilian infrastructure for a while now. A big percentage of the drones are now being hit in the air. So the intended damage is much higher and much more sinister than what we see. Afaik, they targeted even Lviv with drones but they were taken out in the air.

    But frankly, I cannot but suspect the motives of outsiders like yourself who harp so much on the atrocity issue and bring it up as an argument that there can be no negotiations at all with Russia
     
    So you think the atrocities should just be swept under the carpet? There are awful many of them by now. My words that I post here, for the most part, are very closely aligned with what a large percentage of Ukrainians believe (as well as a small group of the Russian nationalists who are on the side of Ukraine and Europe). We have a common outlook.

    that this must end in total Ukrainian victory, no matter the costs,
     
    No one knows where it will end, but as long as there are men (and women) willing and able to fight and if they receive weapons, it will go on. That's how it always works. They are being constantly shelled and attacked so they can't stop. Would you in their position? You wouldn't defend yourself? Sorry to mention this but they have kids and it's a perspective that you may not be able to relate to.

    that citizens of the Western states supporting Ukraine have no right no question Ukrainian policies.

     

    You have a right to question certain things. But there is a fine line. You can question what kind of assistance to deliver and how it is used, but I don't think you can question internal policies (since the decision has already been made by the West to help). At least not with the paternalistic tone that you do. Things have gone too far and the war needs to run its course now. The Russians chose to be there. When you walk into a country with weapons in your hands in order to murder you have already chosen your destiny.

    Remember, that a large proportion of Westerners, especially in places such as Scandinavia, still support Ukraine. So you are as much against them as you are against us.

    Replies: @German_reader, @Matra, @Yevardian, @silviosilver

    You have a right to question certain things. But there is a fine line. You can question what kind of assistance to deliver and how it is used, but I don’t think you can question internal policies (since the decision has already been made by the West to help). At least not with the paternalistic tone that you do. Things have gone too far and the war needs to run its course now. The Russians chose to be there. When you walk into a country with weapons in your hands in order to murder you have already chosen your destiny.

    Certainly a pushy bastard, this one.

    Of course, it’s very easy to strike such a confident tone when you think you’re set to win.

    I expect he’ll be singing a very different tune if it turns out he’s set to lose.

    • Replies: @AnonfromTN
    @silviosilver

    If memory serves, this personage did not say anything of the kind when Ukies invaded Donbass in 2014. They murdered more than 13 000 people since then, killed and maimed more than 500 children, and Western hypocrites pretended that this string of war crimes by Kiev regime never happened.

    Replies: @AP

    , @LatW
    @silviosilver

    LOL.

    Come on, when has the West not been consulted (nevermind the screaming on Twitter, those are just all sorts of public reactions)? Of course, the West will be closely consulted and heard out going forward as well. Reconstruction will be a common effort.

  170. @sudden death
    Homosexual propagandist, working in antifa Kremlin media calls for drowning and burning of UA kids:

    https://twitter.com/JuliaDavisNews/status/1584054018145685504

    tbf, Simonyan herself sort of publicly condemned him too after this, so this might have been off the script improvisation to the tune of current moods, but only if it was not pre-recorded, which is not very clear atm

    Replies: @AnonfromTN

    Why stop at half-truth, and not tell the whole story? Right after this personage made his Ukie-style remarks RT stopped working with this scum. This was announced by Simonyan.

    • Agree: Mikhail
    • Replies: @sudden death
    @AnonfromTN


    RT stopped working with
     
    Haven't seen anything about him being fired officially, the only thing regarding terminating his work was Simonyan quite vaguely writing "at the current moment Ï'm suspending our cooperation" (На данный момент я останавливаю наше сотрудничество), which could be interpreted widely or narrowly if one wishes, but imho we''ll see or hear him again quite soon in Kremlin's various brand medias.

    https://t.me/margaritasimonyan/12361

    Replies: @Mikhail

  171. @silviosilver
    @LatW


    You have a right to question certain things. But there is a fine line. You can question what kind of assistance to deliver and how it is used, but I don’t think you can question internal policies (since the decision has already been made by the West to help). At least not with the paternalistic tone that you do. Things have gone too far and the war needs to run its course now. The Russians chose to be there. When you walk into a country with weapons in your hands in order to murder you have already chosen your destiny.
     
    Certainly a pushy bastard, this one.

    Of course, it's very easy to strike such a confident tone when you think you're set to win.

    I expect he'll be singing a very different tune if it turns out he's set to lose.

    Replies: @AnonfromTN, @LatW

    If memory serves, this personage did not say anything of the kind when Ukies invaded Donbass in 2014. They murdered more than 13 000 people since then, killed and maimed more than 500 children, and Western hypocrites pretended that this string of war crimes by Kiev regime never happened.

    • Replies: @AP
    @AnonfromTN


    this personage did not say anything of the kind when Ukies invaded Donbass in 2014

     

    Donbas was part of Ukraine so they “invaded” their own country. However, Russians such as Girkin and Pavlov (the warlord Motorola) did invade the other country.

    Of the 13,000 dead, 10,000 were soldiers. About half of those, if not more, were Ukrainian soldiers. So you are blaming Ukraine for killing Ukrainian soldiers.

    For the sake of consistency, will you claim that Russia invaded Chechnya and that bombing Moscow and killing civilians there was an acceptable response to that “invasion?”

    Replies: @Beckow, @AnonfromTN

  172. @AnonfromTN
    @Wokechoke

    A hostage with severe Stockholm syndrome

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard

    In the words of Victoria Nuland, fuck the EU!

    Sorry. This whole thing is disgraceful and if Johnson and Macron had two grams of self respect in their bones they would suicide bomb a bank owner.

  173. @A123
    @AnonfromTN


    Takes after its puppeteers: the US
     
    Not-The-President Biden is the puppet. Not the other way around.

    Right now, the U.S. could not puppeteer a Punch & Judy skit.


    nuclear agreement with Iran
     
    I did not know that Iran was running Ukie-stan, though that does makes sense.

    After all, it is 100% proven fact that Khamenei abrogated the JCPOA deal while Obama was still in office. Oath Breaking is predictable behaviour for Persian Shias and Ukie Maximalists.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    I did not know that Iran was running Ukie-stan, though that does makes sense.

    Iran running Ukraine? You really are 100% a strange conspiracy nutter.

    • Replies: @Mikhail
    @Mr. Hack

    On who is running Ukraine:

    https://twitter.com/AnyafromSaintP/status/1583610343871639552

    Replies: @A123, @Mr. Hack

  174. @Wokechoke
    @German_reader

    Ukrainians really are a piece of work as you pointed out. They are giving Poles a run for the money.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    So, what royal lineage do you represent Cokechoke? I mean, if you’re not too embarrassed to reveal the truth about yourself?

  175. @AnonfromTN
    @silviosilver

    If memory serves, this personage did not say anything of the kind when Ukies invaded Donbass in 2014. They murdered more than 13 000 people since then, killed and maimed more than 500 children, and Western hypocrites pretended that this string of war crimes by Kiev regime never happened.

    Replies: @AP

    this personage did not say anything of the kind when Ukies invaded Donbass in 2014

    Donbas was part of Ukraine so they “invaded” their own country. However, Russians such as Girkin and Pavlov (the warlord Motorola) did invade the other country.

    Of the 13,000 dead, 10,000 were soldiers. About half of those, if not more, were Ukrainian soldiers. So you are blaming Ukraine for killing Ukrainian soldiers.

    For the sake of consistency, will you claim that Russia invaded Chechnya and that bombing Moscow and killing civilians there was an acceptable response to that “invasion?”

    • Replies: @Beckow
    @AP


    ...For the sake of consistency
     
    You are in no position to talk about consistency - we reminded you many times that Nato invaded Serbia to make Kosovo independent. It happened first, in the spring of 1999. To this day it is quietly celebrated in the West.

    Your response previously was that you didn't agree with it. Fine, but you are not a decision maker - the decision makers in Nato are the same people who invaded Serbia. Kiev by totally aligning with Nato - don't argue that point, it is obvious - literally owns the Kosovo precedent. What goes around, comes around. The road to this war started with Nato attack on Serbia. Self-determination by force is valid for all or for none.

    Until that is resolved all this talk about 'invasion' and 'change of borders in Europe' is hollow. You can't complain when others do what you did first.

    Replies: @AP

    , @AnonfromTN
    @AP

    Are you saying that mass murder of your own citizens is not a crime? Parteigenosse Hitler would agree. No wonder Ukies like Nazis: kindred spirits.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @AP

  176. Wonder what Kessler syndrome would do to crop yields.

    Figure imaging satellites that help estimate stuff like leaf wetness duration must be low. GPS is too high.

    Is Kessler syndrome overblown?

  177. @A123
    @LatW


    Normally I wouldn’t criticize AfD
    ...
    I don’t even blame far-right Germans for being angry, it’s a tense situation all across, one shouldn’t be pushed to accept foreigners.

     
    Why characterize the desire to protect Christians as "far-right". What AfD, and other center Populist movement wants is an end to the "ultra-left".

    For example: (1)

    A Somali culture-enricher went on a stabbing rampage in the German city of Ludwigshafen, killing two people.

    It turns out that the young miscreant was one of those engineers, doctors, and symbolic analysts welcomed into the country by Angela Merkel during the Great Migration Crisis of 2015.

    Many thanks to Hellequin GB for translating this article from Junge Freiheit:

    Somali knife killer arrived in 2015 as an asylum seeker

    The Somali knifeman from Ludwigshafen came to Germany as an illegal immigrant in 2015. He was then recognized as a refugee and was already known to the police for causing bodily harm, reports the Bild newspaper.

    Meanwhile, shocking new details about the attack continue to emerge. The father of the 20-year-old victim apparently had to watch as his son died, bleeding, before his eyes. “I’ve never seen anyone cry so bitterly,” a witness told the newspaper.

    AfD: One in five Somalis is a suspect

    According to the police, the Somali used a 30 centimeter knife to massacre his victims. “Several witnesses reported that the assailant shouted ‘Allahu Akhbar’, among other slogans, during the attack. As a result, extensive investigations into the motive and background are being carried out,” said the police and public prosecutor. Nevertheless, there is no evidence of an Islamist or terrorist background.

    According to the AfD, there has been a massive crime problem with Somalis in Rhineland-Palatinate for a long time. “Several inquiries from our parliamentary group have shown that immigrants are way overrepresented in the police crime statistics, especially in the case of knife attacks, other violent crimes and sexual offenses, in comparison with the local population,” said Jan Bollinger, spokesman for domestic affairs for the AfD parliamentary group in Rhineland-Palatinate.

    “Particularly striking are Somali, Afghan and Syrian citizens, who are pouring into our country again in large numbers right now,” emphasized the AfD politician. Statistically, about one in five male Somalis is a suspect in at least one crime in the state. Bollinger called for an immediate end to illegal migration to Germany.
     

     
    Centrist Germans, including AfD, need to stand up against the extremism of Scholz/Merkel.

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://gatesofvienna.net/2022/10/somali-knife-jihadi-was-from-the-class-of-2015/

    Replies: @LatW, @songbird

    Seems highly plausible to me that Somalis in the West use up more tax money annually than the GDP of Somalia.

    Is there another such group? Though, to be fair, they have no natural resources.

    Anyway, thinking about Somalis, it is hard to believe that nobody will ever try to send theirs back. Frankly, I don’t believe it.

    IMO, it’s just awaiting a severe economic crunch, and a subsequent change in the idea of what constitutes a citizen.

    • Agree: A123
  178. Aaron Judge and friends late in the game of the Yankees getting swept by the Astros.

  179. @AP
    @AnonfromTN


    this personage did not say anything of the kind when Ukies invaded Donbass in 2014

     

    Donbas was part of Ukraine so they “invaded” their own country. However, Russians such as Girkin and Pavlov (the warlord Motorola) did invade the other country.

    Of the 13,000 dead, 10,000 were soldiers. About half of those, if not more, were Ukrainian soldiers. So you are blaming Ukraine for killing Ukrainian soldiers.

    For the sake of consistency, will you claim that Russia invaded Chechnya and that bombing Moscow and killing civilians there was an acceptable response to that “invasion?”

    Replies: @Beckow, @AnonfromTN

    …For the sake of consistency

    You are in no position to talk about consistency – we reminded you many times that Nato invaded Serbia to make Kosovo independent. It happened first, in the spring of 1999. To this day it is quietly celebrated in the West.

    Your response previously was that you didn’t agree with it. Fine, but you are not a decision maker – the decision makers in Nato are the same people who invaded Serbia. Kiev by totally aligning with Nato – don’t argue that point, it is obvious – literally owns the Kosovo precedent. What goes around, comes around. The road to this war started with Nato attack on Serbia. Self-determination by force is valid for all or for none.

    Until that is resolved all this talk about ‘invasion‘ and ‘change of borders in Europe‘ is hollow. You can’t complain when others do what you did first.

    • Replies: @AP
    @Beckow


    You are in no position to talk about consistency – we reminded you many times that Nato invaded Serbia
     
    I was opposed to NATO action in Serbia, so I am consistent.

    I was wondering about AnoninTN’s personal opinion. If rebellion in Donbas and bombing Kiev and Kharkiv for purposes of removing Donbas are ok, does he view the bombing of Moscow for the purpose of removing Russia from Chechnya to also be acceptable?

    Replies: @Beckow, @Mikhail

  180. @songbird
    @S

    Speaking of drones: Zeihan wants people to call their congressmen to tell them to repeal the Jones Act, which was passed in 1920 and requires all commerce between US ports in US waters to be on US built, flagged, and owned vessels, crewed by US citizens.

    He says they are all union jobs and that traffic on American waterways decreased by 90%, after the act was passed. And that carriage on water is 10 times cheaper than on land, and that almost everything is now shipped by truck with is very expensive in comparison. And one of his favorite points is that the US is very well-watered with navigable rivers. Moreso than any other country in the world.

    I consider it quite a curious holdover from before globalization, and would feel it very unsavory to have foreigners plying all the freshwater ports, deep in the interior.

    Seems to me like a better solution would be robo-ships, which I would speculate would be much more practical than flying drones or self-driving trucks.

    Replies: @A123, @S

    I wasn’t familiar with the Jones Act. Probably was as you allude for future wartime security reasons and maintaining US capability in that area as a strategically important industry.

    About all those US ‘navigable rivers’ Zeihan was talking about, it reminds me of this 1963 Dutch documentary I saw. It seemed the Dutch really did intensively exploit their waterways and canals like a highway system. It showed Dutch people of all ages, including both young adult men and women, piloting the barges.

    The robo ship idea is interesting. I imagine it has been studied. It would seem a robot ship, perhaps ‘piloted’ by an individual remotely with a console (who would also be piloting other ships simultaneously) would be a lot more readily feasible and safe for large scale shipping than drone aircraft and self driving cars and trucks.

    They need to be careful with this automation stuff. People need to be meaningfully occupied.

    The Idiocracy/pleasure orientated Brave New World/1984ish brainwashed slave world they so far seem to be creating looks like a wrong path for mankind for sure.

    • Replies: @songbird
    @S

    That Twilight Zone episode almost seems quaint now.

    Globalization and inflation have made the issue less straight forward. I see the elites as incompetents, but, if they had planned to set the stage for automation, IMO, they couldn't have done it better.

    What I heard is that there a plants that make blue jeans in America that are completely automated now. But are they replacing American workers, or merely reshoring? From the nationalist perspective what is better, to have your textile industry based in Bangladesh or Ethiopia, or to have machines make it domestically? To have Mexican truckers drive right across the border, or to have robo-trucks? I'll admit the answers aren't clear to me, even as I believe that automation is the one hope of preserving lifestyles in the West.

    Recently, I wondered what the first scifi story was that predicted machines that did all the tasks, and caused men to become listless, or even to devolve. I read a memorable one a week or two ago from Project Gutenburg that had a alien race that became brainless caged slugs attended by their super-advanced machines.

    Replies: @A123, @S

  181. Doesn’t look like the doomsday predictions are going to come true. As usual.

    [MORE]

    • Replies: @LondonBob
    @Thulean Friend

    Despite large industrial shutdowns and unseasonable warmth natural gas prices are still five times as high as the ten year average. The doomsday predictions have already come true.

  182. Congrats to Rishi Sunak for becoming British PM. Indians are playing the long game, demographically infiltrating elite circles in key Western countries instead of trying to build up national strength á la China. Perhaps the smarter long-term strategy.

    • Thanks: Sher Singh
    • Replies: @A123
    @Thulean Friend


    Congrats to Rishi Sunak for becoming British PM. Indians are playing the long game, demographically infiltrating elite circles in key Western countries instead of trying to build up national strength á la China. Perhaps the smarter long-term strategy.
     
    His starting position looks like this.

     
    https://i0.wp.com/www.powerlineblog.com/ed-assets/2022/10/Screen-Shot-2022-10-20-at-12.14.56-PM.png
     

    Will Sunak give Braverman a position, and actually clamp down on migration? If not, Migration Realists will take shots at him for Open Borders.

    If Sunak goes full WEF, he could be the last Tory PM ever.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @Coconuts, @Mikel

    , @silviosilver
    @Thulean Friend


    demographically infiltrating elite circles in key Western countries instead of trying to build up national strength á la China. Perhaps the smarter long-term strategy.
     
    Lol, talk about making a virtue out of necessity.

    Of course, given the choice, they'd happily take the national strength that China has achieved; it's simply that, being less competent, they haven't (and perhaps - certainly it is to be hoped - they never will).

    And also of course, it is white stupidity and apathy that has enabled the infiltration, rather than the ingenuity of hindoo wiles. Even wokesters are more likely to characterize interactions with pajeets as "repellant" than "charming."

    And also also of course, none but a pajeet would celebrate any of this. It's interesting how subdued the "first Indian PM!" reaction has been. If it were the "first black PM!" Britcucks would be fainting from the ecstasy.

    Replies: @sher singh, @Wokechoke

    , @Barbarossa
    @Thulean Friend

    I don't really know much about Rishi Sunak, but is this guy really "Indian" in a deep seated way or is his true loyalty to the international system which makes him filthy rich?
    Is the guy anything but another interchangeable deracinated "citizen of the world" when one gets down to it?

    Replies: @AnonfromTN, @Bashibuzuk

    , @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    @Thulean Friend

    South Asian guys like you are more loquacious and sociable. Chinese males are dorkier especially around white women who dominate the discourse in the West.

    You can't really have a show bobs and vegenes thing with Chinese guys because they don't have that confidence,
    https://i.postimg.cc/0yCZQ3JF/Screenshot-137.jpg

    , @Dmitry
    @Thulean Friend

    I doubt there is kind of "national conspiracy" of Indian immigrants to conquer the Western governments. Especially as the Indian immigrants are often from Africa or other areas of the British empire, not even directly from India. The parents of UK's new leader are Hindus from Africa. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rishi_Sunak

    Indian and Chinese immigrants are both flooding the West. Indian immigrants are often higher income and more ambitious than Chinese immigrants, so it was likely they would have the leader of a Western country before the Chinese immigrants. Although there was a Chinese-American who was presidential candidate in America in 2020.

    There a lot of wealthy Chinese immigrants hiding in the West, but the wealthy Chinese people seem usually more from China's political elite who are quietly moving their money to the West, their children might go to art college and their life is going to expensive restaurants.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

    , @songbird
    @Thulean Friend

    They should have stuck to women of ill repute like Truss and cosmopolitan, r-selected, bastard-spawning mutts like BoJo. It's a mistake to put an obviously alien face on the regime, when so many willing passables would serve.

    Having an Indian PM will only increase the pressure to have a black one. They will need to mix it up - it wouldn't do to have a string of Indian ones , and color-signaling compels them.

    How long before a black PM starts using the word "racist", or before Sunak himself is caught using it? Or before they start lecturing about colonialism?

    Replies: @AnonfromTN, @sher singh, @Coconuts

  183. @Beckow
    @AP


    ...For the sake of consistency
     
    You are in no position to talk about consistency - we reminded you many times that Nato invaded Serbia to make Kosovo independent. It happened first, in the spring of 1999. To this day it is quietly celebrated in the West.

    Your response previously was that you didn't agree with it. Fine, but you are not a decision maker - the decision makers in Nato are the same people who invaded Serbia. Kiev by totally aligning with Nato - don't argue that point, it is obvious - literally owns the Kosovo precedent. What goes around, comes around. The road to this war started with Nato attack on Serbia. Self-determination by force is valid for all or for none.

    Until that is resolved all this talk about 'invasion' and 'change of borders in Europe' is hollow. You can't complain when others do what you did first.

    Replies: @AP

    You are in no position to talk about consistency – we reminded you many times that Nato invaded Serbia

    I was opposed to NATO action in Serbia, so I am consistent.

    I was wondering about AnoninTN’s personal opinion. If rebellion in Donbas and bombing Kiev and Kharkiv for purposes of removing Donbas are ok, does he view the bombing of Moscow for the purpose of removing Russia from Chechnya to also be acceptable?

    • LOL: Mikhail
    • Replies: @Beckow
    @AP

    The consistency has to be on a higher level - in this case among the decision makers in Nato, and consequently also their loyal allies in Kiev. What you and I think doesn't matter. You are also using the word "action", why? It was a war and and an invasion just like this one. It is a cheap propaganda device to use different terms, it only works on really stupid people.


    ...bombing of Moscow for the purpose of removing Russia from Chechnya to also be acceptable?
     
    This is where the second part of the Kosovo analogy comes into play: the winner gets to set the rules. Chechnya turned out to be too weak, or maybe not really motivated, so they lost and all their actions after the loss were termed terrorism. It happens that way all over the world in all conflicts. "Acceptable" or "justified" went out of the window the moment Nato attacked Serbia - it has been might makes right since then (again).
    , @Mikhail
    @AP


    If rebellion in Donbas and bombing Kiev and Kharkiv for purposes of removing Donbas are ok, does he view the bombing of Moscow for the purpose of removing Russia from Chechnya to also be acceptable?
     
    A rhetorically presented false equivalency.

    The 2/24/22 SMO reluctantly came about after years of patience regarding implementation of the Minsk Protocol and Ukraine's security status as in no NATO membership.

    After the first Chechen war of the 1990s, Chechnya was given considerable autonomy which in turn was taken advantage of by Chechen extremists.

    After the second Chechen war, Chechnya once again became a secure part of Russia - something that can very well relate to some former Ukrainian SSR land with historical, cultural and linguistic ties to Russia.
  184. @Thulean Friend
    Congrats to Rishi Sunak for becoming British PM. Indians are playing the long game, demographically infiltrating elite circles in key Western countries instead of trying to build up national strength á la China. Perhaps the smarter long-term strategy.

    Replies: @A123, @silviosilver, @Barbarossa, @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms, @Dmitry, @songbird

    Congrats to Rishi Sunak for becoming British PM. Indians are playing the long game, demographically infiltrating elite circles in key Western countries instead of trying to build up national strength á la China. Perhaps the smarter long-term strategy.

    His starting position looks like this.

     

     

    Will Sunak give Braverman a position, and actually clamp down on migration? If not, Migration Realists will take shots at him for Open Borders.

    If Sunak goes full WEF, he could be the last Tory PM ever.

    PEACE 😇

    • Replies: @Coconuts
    @A123


    If Sunak goes full WEF, he could be the last Tory PM ever.
     
    I have heard various people speculating that this is what will happen. They are likely to lose all the 'red wall' seats again at least.

    Replies: @AnonfromTN

    , @Mikel
    @A123


    Will Sunak give Braverman a position, and actually clamp down on migration?
     
    An Indian British Prime Minister hiring another Indian to clamp down on immigration to the UK sounds funny but well, if that's what it takes, why not?

    Replies: @A123

  185. @silviosilver
    @LatW


    You have a right to question certain things. But there is a fine line. You can question what kind of assistance to deliver and how it is used, but I don’t think you can question internal policies (since the decision has already been made by the West to help). At least not with the paternalistic tone that you do. Things have gone too far and the war needs to run its course now. The Russians chose to be there. When you walk into a country with weapons in your hands in order to murder you have already chosen your destiny.
     
    Certainly a pushy bastard, this one.

    Of course, it's very easy to strike such a confident tone when you think you're set to win.

    I expect he'll be singing a very different tune if it turns out he's set to lose.

    Replies: @AnonfromTN, @LatW

    LOL.

    Come on, when has the West not been consulted (nevermind the screaming on Twitter, those are just all sorts of public reactions)? Of course, the West will be closely consulted and heard out going forward as well. Reconstruction will be a common effort.

  186. @AP
    @Beckow


    You are in no position to talk about consistency – we reminded you many times that Nato invaded Serbia
     
    I was opposed to NATO action in Serbia, so I am consistent.

    I was wondering about AnoninTN’s personal opinion. If rebellion in Donbas and bombing Kiev and Kharkiv for purposes of removing Donbas are ok, does he view the bombing of Moscow for the purpose of removing Russia from Chechnya to also be acceptable?

    Replies: @Beckow, @Mikhail

    The consistency has to be on a higher level – in this case among the decision makers in Nato, and consequently also their loyal allies in Kiev. What you and I think doesn’t matter. You are also using the word “action“, why? It was a war and and an invasion just like this one. It is a cheap propaganda device to use different terms, it only works on really stupid people.

    …bombing of Moscow for the purpose of removing Russia from Chechnya to also be acceptable?

    This is where the second part of the Kosovo analogy comes into play: the winner gets to set the rules. Chechnya turned out to be too weak, or maybe not really motivated, so they lost and all their actions after the loss were termed terrorism. It happens that way all over the world in all conflicts. “Acceptable” or “justified” went out of the window the moment Nato attacked Serbia – it has been might makes right since then (again).

  187. @songbird
    @AP

    In one of those old cemeteries near Boston Common, there is a grave that has the name "Increase" on it.

    Replies: @Finn

    And what about Increase Mather? What about his son Cotton? My family name sake.

    • Replies: @songbird
    @Finn

    Seem to have been a whole slew of "Increases" in the area. IMO, they'd be an interesting group to study.

    I'm kind of disappointed that Increase Mather only had one son, and not 16 children (presuming the records are complete.)

    I'd guess the Quebecois were more fertile.

  188. @A123
    @Thulean Friend


    Congrats to Rishi Sunak for becoming British PM. Indians are playing the long game, demographically infiltrating elite circles in key Western countries instead of trying to build up national strength á la China. Perhaps the smarter long-term strategy.
     
    His starting position looks like this.

     
    https://i0.wp.com/www.powerlineblog.com/ed-assets/2022/10/Screen-Shot-2022-10-20-at-12.14.56-PM.png
     

    Will Sunak give Braverman a position, and actually clamp down on migration? If not, Migration Realists will take shots at him for Open Borders.

    If Sunak goes full WEF, he could be the last Tory PM ever.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @Coconuts, @Mikel

    If Sunak goes full WEF, he could be the last Tory PM ever.

    I have heard various people speculating that this is what will happen. They are likely to lose all the ‘red wall’ seats again at least.

    • Replies: @AnonfromTN
    @Coconuts

    You are naïve. I am not sure such a thing as fair elections exists (even if it ever existed, which is a big if). US elections of 2020 showed that the results are determined by fraud, how the electorate votes is irrelevant.

  189. @AP
    @Beckow


    You are in no position to talk about consistency – we reminded you many times that Nato invaded Serbia
     
    I was opposed to NATO action in Serbia, so I am consistent.

    I was wondering about AnoninTN’s personal opinion. If rebellion in Donbas and bombing Kiev and Kharkiv for purposes of removing Donbas are ok, does he view the bombing of Moscow for the purpose of removing Russia from Chechnya to also be acceptable?

    Replies: @Beckow, @Mikhail

    If rebellion in Donbas and bombing Kiev and Kharkiv for purposes of removing Donbas are ok, does he view the bombing of Moscow for the purpose of removing Russia from Chechnya to also be acceptable?

    A rhetorically presented false equivalency.

    The 2/24/22 SMO reluctantly came about after years of patience regarding implementation of the Minsk Protocol and Ukraine’s security status as in no NATO membership.

    After the first Chechen war of the 1990s, Chechnya was given considerable autonomy which in turn was taken advantage of by Chechen extremists.

    After the second Chechen war, Chechnya once again became a secure part of Russia – something that can very well relate to some former Ukrainian SSR land with historical, cultural and linguistic ties to Russia.

  190. ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ

  191. @Mr. Hack
    @A123


    I did not know that Iran was running Ukie-stan, though that does makes sense.
     
    Iran running Ukraine? You really are 100% a strange conspiracy nutter.

    https://www.toonpool.com/user/82/files/iran_downs_ukrainian_flight__3503455.jpg

    Replies: @Mikhail

    On who is running Ukraine:

    • Replies: @A123
    @Mikhail

    Do you really believe that this guy is running Ukraine? Really?

    Not-The-President Biden cannot even walk away from a podium. There is no leadership there.

    PEACE 😇

    https://twitter.com/tomselliott/status/1575902223246278666?s=20

    Replies: @Mikhail

    , @Mr. Hack
    @Mikhail

    Last that I heard it was democratically elected Zelensky that was the president in Ukraine. Here's the blood stained dictator from the north that's trying to run Ukraine. He's ruining his own country in able to do so and somehow I don't think that he's going to succeed:

    https://www.ocregister.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/stg022822dAPR.jpg?w=620

    Replies: @Mikhail

  192. in order to minimize the load on this thread, please continue to restrict your Tweets or place them under a MORE tag.

    — Ron Unz

    • Replies: @Mikhail
    @Emil Nikola Richard

    I've been doing the former. I'll restrict even less.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard

  193. @Emil Nikola Richard

    in order to minimize the load on this thread, please continue to restrict your Tweets or place them under a MORE tag.

    — Ron Unz
     

    Replies: @Mikhail

    I’ve been doing the former. I’ll restrict even less.

    • Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Mikhail

    You might notice I did not @ you.

    Apparently you chose to illustrate the words of Malcom X: when you throw a rock at a pack of dogs the one that yelps is the one who got hit.

    Kanye West and Lex Friedman arguing about jews.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4AWLcxTGZPA

    Dreadful as foreground. As background it is the most hilarious thing all week.

  194. @Mikhail
    @Emil Nikola Richard

    I've been doing the former. I'll restrict even less.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard

    You might notice I did not @ you.

    Apparently you chose to illustrate the words of Malcom X: when you throw a rock at a pack of dogs the one that yelps is the one who got hit.

    Kanye West and Lex Friedman arguing about jews.

    Dreadful as foreground. As background it is the most hilarious thing all week.

  195. @Thulean Friend
    Congrats to Rishi Sunak for becoming British PM. Indians are playing the long game, demographically infiltrating elite circles in key Western countries instead of trying to build up national strength á la China. Perhaps the smarter long-term strategy.

    Replies: @A123, @silviosilver, @Barbarossa, @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms, @Dmitry, @songbird

    demographically infiltrating elite circles in key Western countries instead of trying to build up national strength á la China. Perhaps the smarter long-term strategy.

    Lol, talk about making a virtue out of necessity.

    Of course, given the choice, they’d happily take the national strength that China has achieved; it’s simply that, being less competent, they haven’t (and perhaps – certainly it is to be hoped – they never will).

    And also of course, it is white stupidity and apathy that has enabled the infiltration, rather than the ingenuity of hindoo wiles. Even wokesters are more likely to characterize interactions with pajeets as “repellant” than “charming.”

    And also also of course, none but a pajeet would celebrate any of this. It’s interesting how subdued the “first Indian PM!” reaction has been. If it were the “first black PM!” Britcucks would be fainting from the ecstasy.

    • Replies: @sher singh
    @silviosilver

    Nobody hates Punjabis or thinks they're pajeets.
    Stay butthurt balkanoid faggot,

    When it comes down to everything being counted,
    All you did was christianize europe & impart whites genes on the Turks.

    Lit harem of monotheism.

    , @Wokechoke
    @silviosilver

    A good example of this was the career and biography of Imran Khan. Educated in an excellent private school in Worcestershire he was basically an Englishman. He became the legendary captain of the Pakistan cricket team. When he turned to politics he moved to his motherland and played his part as a man there. He could have easily been a cabinet minister in the UK or even a PM. But he was a decent enough gentleman to have his second career where he could do most good for his kind.

    Sunak is a walking talking insult.

  196. @Thulean Friend
    Congrats to Rishi Sunak for becoming British PM. Indians are playing the long game, demographically infiltrating elite circles in key Western countries instead of trying to build up national strength á la China. Perhaps the smarter long-term strategy.

    Replies: @A123, @silviosilver, @Barbarossa, @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms, @Dmitry, @songbird

    I don’t really know much about Rishi Sunak, but is this guy really “Indian” in a deep seated way or is his true loyalty to the international system which makes him filthy rich?
    Is the guy anything but another interchangeable deracinated “citizen of the world” when one gets down to it?

    • Agree: Sher Singh
    • Replies: @AnonfromTN
    @Barbarossa

    Filthy rich people of any origin have only one loyalty: to their money

    , @Bashibuzuk
    @Barbarossa

    https://bylinetimes.com/2022/05/25/controversial-firm-linked-to-rishi-sunak-among-those-allowed-to-set-global-anti-corruption-agenda-by-world-economic-forum/

    https://kreately.in/would-be-british-pm-rishi-sunaks-family-runs-a-china-linked-world-economic-forum-partner-company-pushing-digital-id-and-social-credit-scores/

    https://www.theguardian.com/business/2021/apr/19/rishi-sunak-bank-of-england-digital-currency-uk-brexit-eu

    Voilà !

    🙂

    Replies: @Barbarossa

  197. @A123
    @Thulean Friend


    Congrats to Rishi Sunak for becoming British PM. Indians are playing the long game, demographically infiltrating elite circles in key Western countries instead of trying to build up national strength á la China. Perhaps the smarter long-term strategy.
     
    His starting position looks like this.

     
    https://i0.wp.com/www.powerlineblog.com/ed-assets/2022/10/Screen-Shot-2022-10-20-at-12.14.56-PM.png
     

    Will Sunak give Braverman a position, and actually clamp down on migration? If not, Migration Realists will take shots at him for Open Borders.

    If Sunak goes full WEF, he could be the last Tory PM ever.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @Coconuts, @Mikel

    Will Sunak give Braverman a position, and actually clamp down on migration?

    An Indian British Prime Minister hiring another Indian to clamp down on immigration to the UK sounds funny but well, if that’s what it takes, why not?

    • Replies: @A123
    @Mikel


    An Indian British Prime Minister hiring another Indian to clamp down on immigration to the UK sounds funny but well, if that’s what it takes, why not?
     
    It actually makes sense if you consider it this way:

    An Infidel British Prime Minister hiring another Infidel to clamp down on Muslim immigration...

    We will find out Sunak's picks shortly. Even if he selects Braverman, will she have the necessary authority to:

    • Restart the "Stay in Africa" plan
    • Withdraw from (or openly defy) the ECHR

    It is helpful to have such visible measures. We will know within the first 30 days if Sunak is serious. Or, if his destiny is to be outlived by a lettuce.
    ___

    The same thing could have worked in France. Infidel Zemmour would have attempted to follow through on his migration campaign points. "Could he beat France's deep state?", is much less clear.

    Zemmour would outperform Macron. Of course, that is not a very high bar.

    PEACE 😇

  198. @Thulean Friend
    Congrats to Rishi Sunak for becoming British PM. Indians are playing the long game, demographically infiltrating elite circles in key Western countries instead of trying to build up national strength á la China. Perhaps the smarter long-term strategy.

    Replies: @A123, @silviosilver, @Barbarossa, @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms, @Dmitry, @songbird

    South Asian guys like you are more loquacious and sociable. Chinese males are dorkier especially around white women who dominate the discourse in the West.

    You can’t really have a show bobs and vegenes thing with Chinese guys because they don’t have that confidence,

    • LOL: Bashibuzuk
  199. @Thulean Friend
    Congrats to Rishi Sunak for becoming British PM. Indians are playing the long game, demographically infiltrating elite circles in key Western countries instead of trying to build up national strength á la China. Perhaps the smarter long-term strategy.

    Replies: @A123, @silviosilver, @Barbarossa, @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms, @Dmitry, @songbird

    I doubt there is kind of “national conspiracy” of Indian immigrants to conquer the Western governments. Especially as the Indian immigrants are often from Africa or other areas of the British empire, not even directly from India. The parents of UK’s new leader are Hindus from Africa. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rishi_Sunak

    Indian and Chinese immigrants are both flooding the West. Indian immigrants are often higher income and more ambitious than Chinese immigrants, so it was likely they would have the leader of a Western country before the Chinese immigrants. Although there was a Chinese-American who was presidential candidate in America in 2020.

    There a lot of wealthy Chinese immigrants hiding in the West, but the wealthy Chinese people seem usually more from China’s political elite who are quietly moving their money to the West, their children might go to art college and their life is going to expensive restaurants.

    • Replies: @Bashibuzuk
    @Dmitry


    The parents of UK’s new leader are Hindus from Africa
     
    Kamala's grand parents as well.

    https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2019-10-25/how-kamala-harris-indian-family-shaped-her-political-career
  200. @German_reader
    @LatW


    in your own country centers where Ukrainian refugees live are being burned down, probably either by local Russians or AfD supporters
     
    I don't exclude the possibility that this happened, but unless it's proven, it could be just as well a hoax, like many other alleged neo-Nazi attacks here (not that there haven't been acts of violence, even murders, by neo-Nazis, especially in the 1990s and early 2000s, but there is also a long, long history of stories that turned out to be utterly fake, but were nevertheless promoted by the media, to justify the repression against any right-wing opposion, no matter how tame). It's typical though that this is eagerly taken up and made a big stoy by Visegrad 24 and the like, yet more evidence that there is no common ground with the "based" Eastern Euros.

    but this is definitely an instrument of yours to use to push Eastern Euros around.
     
    Then leave. Frankly, as far as the Baltic states are concerned, you are nothing but a huge liability, in retrospect it's absolutely clear that you should have never been admitted to either the EU or to NATO. You contribute nothing of worth, your only function is so that the very worst kind of American hegemonist can point to your statelets as evidence that their preferred policies enjoy support in Europe (which they actually don't among most of the pre-1990 members of NATO, nor among many other Eastern Europeans).

    Nationalism for me, but not for thee.
     
    No, it's exactly the reverse. You think you're entitled to unconditional Western support for your little ethno-projects (including even bizarre larping like "Perun give us strength") and for your manic hatreds, but you make zero effort to consider any wider interests and you readily resort to tactics of moral blackmail which are only reinforcing the ruling narratives. Terrible deal from any perspective.

    Replies: @LatW, @A123, @Dmitry

    Lol the danger of writing German as the first word of your username. Now for all your internet life, foreigners will interact with you as the representative of the German nation or the German government.

    And after time you couldn’t avoid it. There is statement to “LatW” to exit the EU, like we are seeing important decisions about the future of Latvia from a difficult discussion between Olaf Scholz and (I have to search for the leader of Latvia) Egils Levits.

  201. @AP
    @Matra


    I’m noticing a drop in sympathy from Western Europeans who communicate online in English and French for these supposedly based Central/Eastern European countries like Poland.
     
    A combination of the phenomenon of useful-for-Russia idiots who see a savior in Putin and therefore hatred for his enemies, and resentment of peoples who are superior to them and highlight their own faults. Peoples who actually fight for their homelands rather than invite in invaders who displace them, peoples who demand money rather than give it to those who replace them in their own lands, peoples who retain a high level of physical beauty that has been fading among the Westerners, etc.

    In other news nearly 630k Ukrainians have applied for temporary resident status – in Canada
     
    I'd guess most of the ones in Germany and Poland will return (my own have come back in summer to central Ukraine from the Rhineland where they went in March when Russians were threatening Kiev and Zhytomir) but most of the ones in North America will stay: it is further away and more difficult to come back. Though by no means will they all stay, many husbands and brothers have remained in Ukraine so there is a reason to return.

    Be careful, it will take longer for Canada to become an Indian-Chinese homeland (Singapore North) where Anglo servants kowtow before their new Chinese and Hindu elites, with all of those young Eastern Europeans refugees boosting the European population.

    Replies: @sher singh, @Dmitry

    peoples who demand money rather than give it to those

    Poor countries “demanding money” from rich countries, is apparently something which you see as positive about the poor countries and negative for the rich countries?

    Because rich countries of Western Europe which have successful economy have given more than $100 billion to Poland, this is something you see as positive about Poland? Not the other way? So, better (not in moral sense) to be beggar, than the person who gives to the beggar, who has the productive society and the hardworking population that allows them to give to the beggar?

    those who replace them in their own lands

    Because within the EU system, significant parts of the populations of Eastern European countries emigrate to Western Europe. There is no significant emigration of Western Europeans to live in Poland, but there are millions of Poles emigrating to Western Europe. But this is because the life is better on average significantly in Western Europe, often to say mildly. It’s not some kind of indicator of success for the origin country of the emigrants that it produces this migration direction, but it is indicator of the success of the destination country that people go there to “upgrade their life”.

    Canada to become an Indian-Chinese homeland (Singapore North) where Anglo servants kowtow before their new Chinese and Hindu elites

    Emigration of Eastern Europeans to Canada will surely merge to the immigrants from India and China, more than helping to recreate the anglosaxon history or British empire. It’s increasing the internationalization or multinationalism of Canada, whether you view as good or bad. If it becomes like Singapore in the utopian example, or like Balkans/Lebanon in the dystopian.

    • Replies: @A123
    @Dmitry


    There is no significant emigration of Western Europeans to live in Poland, but there are millions of Poles emigrating to Western Europe. But this is because the life is better on average significantly in Western Europe, often to say mildly.
     
    This is destructive to both sides.

    Recipient Nations / Western Europe

    Native workers in Western European countries have their wages undercut by the massive flows if Schengen migration.

    • What is the total for premature workforce exit "Early Retirement + Disability + Unemployment"?
    • What has happened to the government budget for assistance to natives?
    ___

    Donor Nations / Eastern Europe

    Lose population in the critical band of young adults that generate family formation and children. Thus is an incredibly dangerous, long-term threat to both culture and sovereignty.

    The smallest nations are undergoing a 'brain drain' vicious cycle. When businesses cannot hire locally, they send work over the border. When workers cannot find jobs locally they go over the border. Repeat.
    ___

    The only winners in the EU ponzi scheme are Bankers, MegaCorporations, and other European Elites.

    rich countries of Western Europe which have successful economy have given more than $100 billion to Poland
     
    Looking only at the "Government »» Government" line item is very misleading.

    How much value have Recipient Nations (Western Europeans) extracted from Poland and transferred back to their Elite institutions? This number is vastly higher than the mere $100B.

    PEACE 😇
    , @Coconuts
    @Dmitry


    Because within the EU system, significant parts of the populations of Eastern European countries emigrate to Western Europe. There is no significant emigration of Western Europeans to live in Poland, but there are millions of Poles emigrating to Western Europe. But this is because the life is better on average significantly in Western Europe, often to say mildly.
     
    I heard one commentator (Ed West) say that Poland is predicted to have a higher GDP per capita than the UK in 15 years time. I'm not sure how accurate the prediction is, but the continued rise of the Poland and decline of the UK due to Brazilification effects doesn't seem impossible.

    Replies: @AP, @Dmitry

    , @AP
    @Dmitry


    Poor countries “demanding money” from rich countries, is apparently something which you see as positive about the poor countries
     
    It depends on the nature and context of the demands.

    If Germany chooses to give away hundreds of $ millions to non-European “refugees” it is good of a European people to divert some of the Germans’ money, that otherwise would be spent on their anti-European population replacement project, towards other Europeans for a change.


    So, better (not in moral sense) to be beggar, than the person who gives to the beggar

     

    It’s not being a beggar when the money is compensation. If you smash my car and I demand that you pay for the damages I am not being a “beggar.”

    There is no significant emigration of Western Europeans to live in Poland, but there are millions of Poles emigrating to Western Europe. But this is because the life is better on average significantly in Western Europe
     
    No, it’s not because life is necessarily better but because more money can be made and some people sacrifice years of their lives in order to provide better material circumstances for their families. Poland is a very nice and pleasant place but incomes are a lot higher in the West so some people move there.

    It’s increasing the internationalization or multinationalism of Canada, whether you view as good or bad. If it becomes like Singapore in the utopian example, or like Balkans/Lebanon in the dystopian.

     

    It depends on who emigrates. It will be like Singapore if it’s a massive wave of Chinese and South Asians. Parts that have been flooded already, have earned the nickname Hongcouver. In this city the middle and upper classes are mostly well dressed Chinese from Hong Kong, with some Whites and upper caste Indians and Sikhs mixed in. There is a large mass of mostly White, and a few Native, heroin junkies. The district with junkies has much more pre-Asian people (of native European and native Indian descent) than the nicer parts of the city. Once upon a time the British Europeans displaced the native Indians and now the cycle continues and the Chinese and Asian Indians have displaced the British Europeans, who have joined the native Indians in the impoverished margins.*

    There aren’t enough Balkan and Lebanese immigrants to make Canada another Lebanon or Balkans.

    Mass Ukrainian immigration wouldn’t save Canada’s British heritage (the Anglo Canadians have chosen to destroy it themselves, as Anglos do), but would at least keep the place more European.

    *At least, this is the impression I got from spending a few days in downtown Vancouver, a beautiful and wealthy Chinese city, made of green and blue glass, whose Chinese residents are mostly like civilized Chinese from Hong Kong or Singapore rather than Sovok-like mainlanders, where European people and Native Indians dress in rags, use drugs and beg for money. I think there are normal Europeans living out in many of the suburbs to which they have retreated.

    Replies: @Dmitry, @sher singh, @silviosilver

  202. @AP
    @AnonfromTN


    this personage did not say anything of the kind when Ukies invaded Donbass in 2014

     

    Donbas was part of Ukraine so they “invaded” their own country. However, Russians such as Girkin and Pavlov (the warlord Motorola) did invade the other country.

    Of the 13,000 dead, 10,000 were soldiers. About half of those, if not more, were Ukrainian soldiers. So you are blaming Ukraine for killing Ukrainian soldiers.

    For the sake of consistency, will you claim that Russia invaded Chechnya and that bombing Moscow and killing civilians there was an acceptable response to that “invasion?”

    Replies: @Beckow, @AnonfromTN

    Are you saying that mass murder of your own citizens is not a crime? Parteigenosse Hitler would agree. No wonder Ukies like Nazis: kindred spirits.

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @AnonfromTN

    No wonder that Ukraine's fifth column likes Putler:

    https://images.news18.com/ibnlive/uploads/2022/02/putin-hitler.png

    So tell me Professor Janissar, who are the real "Nazis" within Ukraine?

    , @AP
    @AnonfromTN

    The fact that you refused to answer the question is telling, but I’ll ask again:

    If it is acceptable to kill people in Kiev, Kharkiv etc. due to to the killing of civilians in Donbas (total of 8 in 2021), was it also acceptable to kill people in Moscow due to the killing of civilians in Grozny (10,000s).

  203. @Barbarossa
    @Thulean Friend

    I don't really know much about Rishi Sunak, but is this guy really "Indian" in a deep seated way or is his true loyalty to the international system which makes him filthy rich?
    Is the guy anything but another interchangeable deracinated "citizen of the world" when one gets down to it?

    Replies: @AnonfromTN, @Bashibuzuk

    Filthy rich people of any origin have only one loyalty: to their money

    • Agree: Barbarossa
  204. @Thulean Friend
    Doesn't look like the doomsday predictions are going to come true. As usual.

    https://i.imgur.com/4HCKdpQ.jpg

    https://twitter.com/AndreasSteno/status/1584450621356134400

    Replies: @LondonBob

    Despite large industrial shutdowns and unseasonable warmth natural gas prices are still five times as high as the ten year average. The doomsday predictions have already come true.

  205. @Dmitry
    @AP


    peoples who demand money rather than give it to those
     
    Poor countries "demanding money" from rich countries, is apparently something which you see as positive about the poor countries and negative for the rich countries?

    Because rich countries of Western Europe which have successful economy have given more than $100 billion to Poland, this is something you see as positive about Poland? Not the other way? So, better (not in moral sense) to be beggar, than the person who gives to the beggar, who has the productive society and the hardworking population that allows them to give to the beggar?


    those who replace them in their own lands
     
    Because within the EU system, significant parts of the populations of Eastern European countries emigrate to Western Europe. There is no significant emigration of Western Europeans to live in Poland, but there are millions of Poles emigrating to Western Europe. But this is because the life is better on average significantly in Western Europe, often to say mildly. It's not some kind of indicator of success for the origin country of the emigrants that it produces this migration direction, but it is indicator of the success of the destination country that people go there to "upgrade their life".

    Canada to become an Indian-Chinese homeland (Singapore North) where Anglo servants kowtow before their new Chinese and Hindu elites
     
    Emigration of Eastern Europeans to Canada will surely merge to the immigrants from India and China, more than helping to recreate the anglosaxon history or British empire. It's increasing the internationalization or multinationalism of Canada, whether you view as good or bad. If it becomes like Singapore in the utopian example, or like Balkans/Lebanon in the dystopian.

    Replies: @A123, @Coconuts, @AP

    There is no significant emigration of Western Europeans to live in Poland, but there are millions of Poles emigrating to Western Europe. But this is because the life is better on average significantly in Western Europe, often to say mildly.

    This is destructive to both sides.

    Recipient Nations / Western Europe

    Native workers in Western European countries have their wages undercut by the massive flows if Schengen migration.

    • What is the total for premature workforce exit “Early Retirement + Disability + Unemployment”?
    • What has happened to the government budget for assistance to natives?
    ___

    Donor Nations / Eastern Europe

    Lose population in the critical band of young adults that generate family formation and children. Thus is an incredibly dangerous, long-term threat to both culture and sovereignty.

    The smallest nations are undergoing a ‘brain drain’ vicious cycle. When businesses cannot hire locally, they send work over the border. When workers cannot find jobs locally they go over the border. Repeat.
    ___

    The only winners in the EU ponzi scheme are Bankers, MegaCorporations, and other European Elites.

    rich countries of Western Europe which have successful economy have given more than $100 billion to Poland

    Looking only at the “Government »» Government” line item is very misleading.

    How much value have Recipient Nations (Western Europeans) extracted from Poland and transferred back to their Elite institutions? This number is vastly higher than the mere $100B.

    PEACE 😇

  206. @Mikhail
    @Mr. Hack

    On who is running Ukraine:

    https://twitter.com/AnyafromSaintP/status/1583610343871639552

    Replies: @A123, @Mr. Hack

    Do you really believe that this guy is running Ukraine? Really?

    Not-The-President Biden cannot even walk away from a podium. There is no leadership there.

    PEACE 😇

    • Replies: @Mikhail
    @A123

    He's very much a willing figurehead as he could resign as a form of protest. That he goes along on his role as president makes him culpable.

    Replies: @A123

  207. @Mikhail
    @Mr. Hack

    On who is running Ukraine:

    https://twitter.com/AnyafromSaintP/status/1583610343871639552

    Replies: @A123, @Mr. Hack

    Last that I heard it was democratically elected Zelensky that was the president in Ukraine. Here’s the blood stained dictator from the north that’s trying to run Ukraine. He’s ruining his own country in able to do so and somehow I don’t think that he’s going to succeed:

    • Replies: @Mikhail
    @Mr. Hack


    Last that I heard it was democratically elected Zelensky that was the president in Ukraine. Here’s the blood stained dictator from the north that’s trying to run Ukraine. He’s ruining his own country in able to do so and somehow I don’t think that he’s going to succeed:

     

    You remind me of Counterpunch's ongoing demise.

    https://www.counterpunch.org/2022/10/24/the-far-right-and-far-left-smear-campaign-against-ukraine/

    The above linked article disingenuously says that Vladimir Putin ditched the Minsk Protocol, while omitting the counters to that misinformed statement. Petro Poroshenko, the Kiev regime president who signed that document, has acknowledged that it was his intent to buy time as opposed to honoring the agreement. The time bought was for the Kiev regime to build up its forces for an eventual push into the rebel held Donbass territory. The Kiev regime had seven years to implement the Minsk Protocol before Russia's SMO.

    After patiently waiting for the Kiev regime to fulfill its obligation, Russia sensed what was evident to the contrary and proceeded to act accordingly.

    Poroshenko's successor Volodomyr Zelensky won on a platform calling for a negotiated end to the Donbass conflict and respecting the Russian language. There's a tape of him also saying that Russians and Ukrainians are the same people. After becoming president, Zelensky contradicted himself in a way that includes his saying that people in Ukraine who want to speak Russian and feel kinship towards Russia should leave. They should leave the land of their forefathers on account of a shyster politician?

    On another point raised, it's fair to say that the Kiev regime is a neo-Nazi influenced entity as has been discussed in detail at this and some other venues.

    Zelensky's flipflop can be reasonably attributed to the disproportionate neo-Nazi influence in Kiev regime-controlled Ukraine. Also discussed at length is how Ukraine's Commie drawn boundary brought together people with different geopolitical, cultural and linguistic preferences. The Banderite aim of having their view dominate over others is a recipe for not keeping that boundary together as a separate entity from Russia.
  208. @S
    @songbird

    I wasn't familiar with the Jones Act. Probably was as you allude for future wartime security reasons and maintaining US capability in that area as a strategically important industry.

    About all those US 'navigable rivers' Zeihan was talking about, it reminds me of this 1963 Dutch documentary I saw. It seemed the Dutch really did intensively exploit their waterways and canals like a highway system. It showed Dutch people of all ages, including both young adult men and women, piloting the barges.

    The robo ship idea is interesting. I imagine it has been studied. It would seem a robot ship, perhaps 'piloted' by an individual remotely with a console (who would also be piloting other ships simultaneously) would be a lot more readily feasible and safe for large scale shipping than drone aircraft and self driving cars and trucks.

    They need to be careful with this automation stuff. People need to be meaningfully occupied.

    The Idiocracy/pleasure orientated Brave New World/1984ish brainwashed slave world they so far seem to be creating looks like a wrong path for mankind for sure.

    https://youtu.be/gqy1dRgn7Pc

    Replies: @songbird

    That Twilight Zone episode almost seems quaint now.

    [MORE]

    Globalization and inflation have made the issue less straight forward. I see the elites as incompetents, but, if they had planned to set the stage for automation, IMO, they couldn’t have done it better.

    What I heard is that there a plants that make blue jeans in America that are completely automated now. But are they replacing American workers, or merely reshoring? From the nationalist perspective what is better, to have your textile industry based in Bangladesh or Ethiopia, or to have machines make it domestically? To have Mexican truckers drive right across the border, or to have robo-trucks? I’ll admit the answers aren’t clear to me, even as I believe that automation is the one hope of preserving lifestyles in the West.

    Recently, I wondered what the first scifi story was that predicted machines that did all the tasks, and caused men to become listless, or even to devolve. I read a memorable one a week or two ago from Project Gutenburg that had a alien race that became brainless caged slugs attended by their super-advanced machines.

    • Replies: @A123
    @songbird


    Recently, I wondered what the first scifi story was that predicted machines that did all the tasks, and caused men to become listless, or even to devolve. I read a memorable one a week or two ago from Project Gutenburg that had a alien race that became brainless caged slugs attended by their super-advanced machines.
     
    The original Trek covered this ground multiple times. Most notably, Gamesters of Triskelon.

     
    https://m0vie.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/tos-gamestersoftriskelion25.jpg
     

    I do not know who would be first. Probably, someone writing in the 1920-30's time frame, like E. E. "Doc" Smith.
    ____

    As a side note, this compendium of the first four Elric books is on sale for $1.99 (kindle version).

    Elric of Melniboné may be the original "dark brooding hero" archetype.

    PEACE 😇



    https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B08VJLT6RS/
    , @S
    @songbird


    Recently, I wondered what the first scifi story was that predicted machines that did all the tasks, and caused men to become listless, or even to devolve.
     
    That's a good question. I wouldn't know. I imagen they go back quite aways.

    I read a memorable one a week or two ago from Project Gutenburg that had a alien race that became brainless caged slugs attended by their super-advanced machines.
     
    Sounds a little bit like now with so many folks unhealthy attachment to 'social media'. Also sounds a like the 1909 short story The Machine Stops

    The story, set in a world where humanity lives underground and relies on a giant machine to provide its needs, predicted technologies similar to instant messaging and the Internet.

    The story describes a world in which most of the human population has lost the ability to live on the surface of the Earth. Each individual now lives in isolation below ground in a standard room, with all bodily and spiritual needs met by the omnipotent, global Machine. Travel is permitted, but is unpopular and rarely necessary. Communication is made via a kind of instant messaging/video conferencing machine with which people conduct their only activity: the sharing of ideas and what passes for knowledge.
     
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Machine_Stops

    Replies: @Barbarossa

  209. @Dmitry
    @AP


    peoples who demand money rather than give it to those
     
    Poor countries "demanding money" from rich countries, is apparently something which you see as positive about the poor countries and negative for the rich countries?

    Because rich countries of Western Europe which have successful economy have given more than $100 billion to Poland, this is something you see as positive about Poland? Not the other way? So, better (not in moral sense) to be beggar, than the person who gives to the beggar, who has the productive society and the hardworking population that allows them to give to the beggar?


    those who replace them in their own lands
     
    Because within the EU system, significant parts of the populations of Eastern European countries emigrate to Western Europe. There is no significant emigration of Western Europeans to live in Poland, but there are millions of Poles emigrating to Western Europe. But this is because the life is better on average significantly in Western Europe, often to say mildly. It's not some kind of indicator of success for the origin country of the emigrants that it produces this migration direction, but it is indicator of the success of the destination country that people go there to "upgrade their life".

    Canada to become an Indian-Chinese homeland (Singapore North) where Anglo servants kowtow before their new Chinese and Hindu elites
     
    Emigration of Eastern Europeans to Canada will surely merge to the immigrants from India and China, more than helping to recreate the anglosaxon history or British empire. It's increasing the internationalization or multinationalism of Canada, whether you view as good or bad. If it becomes like Singapore in the utopian example, or like Balkans/Lebanon in the dystopian.

    Replies: @A123, @Coconuts, @AP

    Because within the EU system, significant parts of the populations of Eastern European countries emigrate to Western Europe. There is no significant emigration of Western Europeans to live in Poland, but there are millions of Poles emigrating to Western Europe. But this is because the life is better on average significantly in Western Europe, often to say mildly.

    I heard one commentator (Ed West) say that Poland is predicted to have a higher GDP per capita than the UK in 15 years time. I’m not sure how accurate the prediction is, but the continued rise of the Poland and decline of the UK due to Brazilification effects doesn’t seem impossible.

    • Replies: @AP
    @Coconuts

    Yes, if GDP per capita in both Poland and the UK maintain the same pace in the next 15 years as they have in the past 15 years they will converge.

    I was very impressed by how nice rural Poland was when I visited in April. It wasn’t only physically beautiful but also prosperous. Those villages certainly had nicer, larger, and better maintained houses than I’ve seen in rural Maine or Appalachia! I suspect rural England is also worse.

    I am told this is because a lot of the rural Polish owners had spent years working in the West and sent the money back, to build their dream homes. Eastern Poland where I was had the highest rate of such pioneers, choosing to live and work in the West which is worse in most ways but better in one way (high income) for awhile.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

    , @Dmitry
    @Coconuts

    Germany's economy is merging Poland as their lower cost production center while wealthy EU countries transfer hundreds of billions of dollars to Poland for "convergence funding".

    EU's concept is all EU countries should be viewed as a single country, which should increase equality until convergence. So, taxpayers in wealthy countries should transfer to poor countries, until there is "convergence".

    For countries like Poland, there might always be the limit for convergence to their neighbor, as the great companies, engineers and most talented workers, technology, will be mostly German (or another elite country).

    Siemens, Volkswagen, Bosch or Daimler, can outsource factories to Poland for lower costs, but the larger basis of the corporations' success is not the lower cost production area, is more related to the German engineering culture, education and management.

    There could be more space for convergence by the EU, but Poland will perhaps not go to German levels, without undermining much of the reason for the investment in Poland. (I know there is the example of the data from Ireland, but this is a small tax haven for the multinational corporations, the reduction of cost is because of the competitive tax and regulation environment, not from lower economic level).


    continued rise of the Poland and decline of the UK due to Brazilification effects doesn’t seem impossible
     
    UK's "Brazification" is importing the wealthiest people in the world and skilled gastarbeiters, with postcolonial working classes.

    Maybe there are some similar effects, but I don't think it really like the process in Brazil (which imported ordinary people, while the colonial elite became just more wealthy), although it could contribute to increasing inequality and cultural damage.

    This internationalization increasing the net wealth level in the UK and creating more of a clique of the ultra-wealthy internationalized people who are controlling the country, which the new leader is an example, although born in the Kingdom, he is married to a wealthy woman that is directly Indian.

    Maybe not such a future for the local culture, but somehow you can doubt that the wealthy of the world will be establishing in Poland. Although for all kinds of other reasons Poland could rise to 50% of UK's GDP per capita this decade?

    Replies: @Coconuts

  210. @Finn
    @songbird

    And what about Increase Mather? What about his son Cotton? My family name sake.

    Replies: @songbird

    Seem to have been a whole slew of “Increases” in the area. IMO, they’d be an interesting group to study.

    I’m kind of disappointed that Increase Mather only had one son, and not 16 children (presuming the records are complete.)

    I’d guess the Quebecois were more fertile.

  211. @AnonfromTN
    @AP

    Are you saying that mass murder of your own citizens is not a crime? Parteigenosse Hitler would agree. No wonder Ukies like Nazis: kindred spirits.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @AP

    No wonder that Ukraine’s fifth column likes Putler:

    So tell me Professor Janissar, who are the real “Nazis” within Ukraine?

  212. @Mikel
    @A123


    Will Sunak give Braverman a position, and actually clamp down on migration?
     
    An Indian British Prime Minister hiring another Indian to clamp down on immigration to the UK sounds funny but well, if that's what it takes, why not?

    Replies: @A123

    An Indian British Prime Minister hiring another Indian to clamp down on immigration to the UK sounds funny but well, if that’s what it takes, why not?

    It actually makes sense if you consider it this way:

    An Infidel British Prime Minister hiring another Infidel to clamp down on Muslim immigration…

    We will find out Sunak’s picks shortly. Even if he selects Braverman, will she have the necessary authority to:

    • Restart the “Stay in Africa” plan
    • Withdraw from (or openly defy) the ECHR

    It is helpful to have such visible measures. We will know within the first 30 days if Sunak is serious. Or, if his destiny is to be outlived by a lettuce.
    ___

    The same thing could have worked in France. Infidel Zemmour would have attempted to follow through on his migration campaign points. “Could he beat France’s deep state?”, is much less clear.

    Zemmour would outperform Macron. Of course, that is not a very high bar.

    PEACE 😇

  213. @Mr. Hack
    @Mikhail

    Last that I heard it was democratically elected Zelensky that was the president in Ukraine. Here's the blood stained dictator from the north that's trying to run Ukraine. He's ruining his own country in able to do so and somehow I don't think that he's going to succeed:

    https://www.ocregister.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/stg022822dAPR.jpg?w=620

    Replies: @Mikhail

    Last that I heard it was democratically elected Zelensky that was the president in Ukraine. Here’s the blood stained dictator from the north that’s trying to run Ukraine. He’s ruining his own country in able to do so and somehow I don’t think that he’s going to succeed:

    You remind me of Counterpunch’s ongoing demise.

    https://www.counterpunch.org/2022/10/24/the-far-right-and-far-left-smear-campaign-against-ukraine/

    The above linked article disingenuously says that Vladimir Putin ditched the Minsk Protocol, while omitting the counters to that misinformed statement. Petro Poroshenko, the Kiev regime president who signed that document, has acknowledged that it was his intent to buy time as opposed to honoring the agreement. The time bought was for the Kiev regime to build up its forces for an eventual push into the rebel held Donbass territory. The Kiev regime had seven years to implement the Minsk Protocol before Russia’s SMO.

    After patiently waiting for the Kiev regime to fulfill its obligation, Russia sensed what was evident to the contrary and proceeded to act accordingly.

    Poroshenko’s successor Volodomyr Zelensky won on a platform calling for a negotiated end to the Donbass conflict and respecting the Russian language. There’s a tape of him also saying that Russians and Ukrainians are the same people. After becoming president, Zelensky contradicted himself in a way that includes his saying that people in Ukraine who want to speak Russian and feel kinship towards Russia should leave. They should leave the land of their forefathers on account of a shyster politician?

    On another point raised, it’s fair to say that the Kiev regime is a neo-Nazi influenced entity as has been discussed in detail at this and some other venues.

    Zelensky’s flipflop can be reasonably attributed to the disproportionate neo-Nazi influence in Kiev regime-controlled Ukraine. Also discussed at length is how Ukraine’s Commie drawn boundary brought together people with different geopolitical, cultural and linguistic preferences. The Banderite aim of having their view dominate over others is a recipe for not keeping that boundary together as a separate entity from Russia.

  214. @A123
    @Mikhail

    Do you really believe that this guy is running Ukraine? Really?

    Not-The-President Biden cannot even walk away from a podium. There is no leadership there.

    PEACE 😇

    https://twitter.com/tomselliott/status/1575902223246278666?s=20

    Replies: @Mikhail

    He’s very much a willing figurehead as he could resign as a form of protest. That he goes along on his role as president makes him culpable.

    • Replies: @A123
    @Mikhail



    Do you really believe that this guy is running Ukraine? Really? Not-The-President Biden cannot even walk away from a podium. There is no leadership there.
     
    He’s very much a willing figurehead as he could resign as a form of protest. That he goes along on his role as president makes him culpable.
     
    The Veggie-In-Chief can only resign if he knows he is theoretically President. Based on his cognitive performance, I suspect he does NOT know. He is that far gone.
    ___

    Mike_from_Russia shared this in #199. Start at 1:14 if the auto advance does not work.

    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-199/#comment-5613131

    https://youtu.be/LLTyFMxgpCI?t=74

    It is much more on target as to who is running Zelensky's regime.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @LatW

  215. @AnonfromTN
    @AP

    Are you saying that mass murder of your own citizens is not a crime? Parteigenosse Hitler would agree. No wonder Ukies like Nazis: kindred spirits.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @AP

    The fact that you refused to answer the question is telling, but I’ll ask again:

    If it is acceptable to kill people in Kiev, Kharkiv etc. due to to the killing of civilians in Donbas (total of 8 in 2021), was it also acceptable to kill people in Moscow due to the killing of civilians in Grozny (10,000s).

    • Agree: sher singh
    • LOL: Mikhail
  216. @songbird
    @S

    That Twilight Zone episode almost seems quaint now.

    Globalization and inflation have made the issue less straight forward. I see the elites as incompetents, but, if they had planned to set the stage for automation, IMO, they couldn't have done it better.

    What I heard is that there a plants that make blue jeans in America that are completely automated now. But are they replacing American workers, or merely reshoring? From the nationalist perspective what is better, to have your textile industry based in Bangladesh or Ethiopia, or to have machines make it domestically? To have Mexican truckers drive right across the border, or to have robo-trucks? I'll admit the answers aren't clear to me, even as I believe that automation is the one hope of preserving lifestyles in the West.

    Recently, I wondered what the first scifi story was that predicted machines that did all the tasks, and caused men to become listless, or even to devolve. I read a memorable one a week or two ago from Project Gutenburg that had a alien race that became brainless caged slugs attended by their super-advanced machines.

    Replies: @A123, @S

    Recently, I wondered what the first scifi story was that predicted machines that did all the tasks, and caused men to become listless, or even to devolve. I read a memorable one a week or two ago from Project Gutenburg that had a alien race that became brainless caged slugs attended by their super-advanced machines.

    The original Trek covered this ground multiple times. Most notably, Gamesters of Triskelon.

     

     

    I do not know who would be first. Probably, someone writing in the 1920-30’s time frame, like E. E. “Doc” Smith.
    ____

    As a side note, this compendium of the first four Elric books is on sale for $1.99 (kindle version).

    Elric of Melniboné may be the original “dark brooding hero” archetype.

    PEACE 😇

    • Thanks: songbird
  217. @AnonfromTN
    @sudden death

    Why stop at half-truth, and not tell the whole story? Right after this personage made his Ukie-style remarks RT stopped working with this scum. This was announced by Simonyan.

    Replies: @sudden death

    RT stopped working with

    Haven’t seen anything about him being fired officially, the only thing regarding terminating his work was Simonyan quite vaguely writing “at the current moment Ï’m suspending our cooperation” (На данный момент я останавливаю наше сотрудничество), which could be interpreted widely or narrowly if one wishes, but imho we”ll see or hear him again quite soon in Kremlin’s various brand medias.

    https://t.me/margaritasimonyan/12361

    • Replies: @Mikhail
    @sudden death

    The Russian government is also looking into his views falling in line with being extremist.

    https://www.rt.com/news/565236-rt-host-krasovsky-investigated/

    Replies: @Mikhail, @LatW

  218. @Dmitry
    @AP


    peoples who demand money rather than give it to those
     
    Poor countries "demanding money" from rich countries, is apparently something which you see as positive about the poor countries and negative for the rich countries?

    Because rich countries of Western Europe which have successful economy have given more than $100 billion to Poland, this is something you see as positive about Poland? Not the other way? So, better (not in moral sense) to be beggar, than the person who gives to the beggar, who has the productive society and the hardworking population that allows them to give to the beggar?


    those who replace them in their own lands
     
    Because within the EU system, significant parts of the populations of Eastern European countries emigrate to Western Europe. There is no significant emigration of Western Europeans to live in Poland, but there are millions of Poles emigrating to Western Europe. But this is because the life is better on average significantly in Western Europe, often to say mildly. It's not some kind of indicator of success for the origin country of the emigrants that it produces this migration direction, but it is indicator of the success of the destination country that people go there to "upgrade their life".

    Canada to become an Indian-Chinese homeland (Singapore North) where Anglo servants kowtow before their new Chinese and Hindu elites
     
    Emigration of Eastern Europeans to Canada will surely merge to the immigrants from India and China, more than helping to recreate the anglosaxon history or British empire. It's increasing the internationalization or multinationalism of Canada, whether you view as good or bad. If it becomes like Singapore in the utopian example, or like Balkans/Lebanon in the dystopian.

    Replies: @A123, @Coconuts, @AP

    Poor countries “demanding money” from rich countries, is apparently something which you see as positive about the poor countries

    It depends on the nature and context of the demands.

    If Germany chooses to give away hundreds of $ millions to non-European “refugees” it is good of a European people to divert some of the Germans’ money, that otherwise would be spent on their anti-European population replacement project, towards other Europeans for a change.

    So, better (not in moral sense) to be beggar, than the person who gives to the beggar

    It’s not being a beggar when the money is compensation. If you smash my car and I demand that you pay for the damages I am not being a “beggar.”

    There is no significant emigration of Western Europeans to live in Poland, but there are millions of Poles emigrating to Western Europe. But this is because the life is better on average significantly in Western Europe

    No, it’s not because life is necessarily better but because more money can be made and some people sacrifice years of their lives in order to provide better material circumstances for their families. Poland is a very nice and pleasant place but incomes are a lot higher in the West so some people move there.

    It’s increasing the internationalization or multinationalism of Canada, whether you view as good or bad. If it becomes like Singapore in the utopian example, or like Balkans/Lebanon in the dystopian.

    It depends on who emigrates. It will be like Singapore if it’s a massive wave of Chinese and South Asians. Parts that have been flooded already, have earned the nickname Hongcouver. In this city the middle and upper classes are mostly well dressed Chinese from Hong Kong, with some Whites and upper caste Indians and Sikhs mixed in. There is a large mass of mostly White, and a few Native, heroin junkies. The district with junkies has much more pre-Asian people (of native European and native Indian descent) than the nicer parts of the city. Once upon a time the British Europeans displaced the native Indians and now the cycle continues and the Chinese and Asian Indians have displaced the British Europeans, who have joined the native Indians in the impoverished margins.*

    There aren’t enough Balkan and Lebanese immigrants to make Canada another Lebanon or Balkans.

    Mass Ukrainian immigration wouldn’t save Canada’s British heritage (the Anglo Canadians have chosen to destroy it themselves, as Anglos do), but would at least keep the place more European.

    *At least, this is the impression I got from spending a few days in downtown Vancouver, a beautiful and wealthy Chinese city, made of green and blue glass, whose Chinese residents are mostly like civilized Chinese from Hong Kong or Singapore rather than Sovok-like mainlanders, where European people and Native Indians dress in rags, use drugs and beg for money. I think there are normal Europeans living out in many of the suburbs to which they have retreated.

    • Replies: @Dmitry
    @AP


    Vancouver.. Sovok

     

    Although much of the property wealth in Vancouver will not be so far from the Chinese Communist Party and a lot closer to it, than the ordinary Chinese people living in China. They are often children of the political elite in China, as the wealth in China and the connection to the communist party are not so uncorrelated. I posted the link a bit for repetitive, but to apologize for the repetition, remember the great report on YouTube about the movement of wealth from China to Vancouver https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IZs2i3Bpx.

    would at least keep the place more European.
     
    It depends what kind of "European". Ukraine is between Sierra Leone and Zambia in the corruption perceptions index.

    Obviously, Canada filters immigrants, so there will be reduction of such cultural transfer by immigrants, but for EU, which introduces the open border system. EU citizens would have open borders, without filtration, from this zone of geographical Europe which is exactly not culturally the brand image of "enlightened Europe".


    life is necessarily better but because more money can be made
     
    Life generally is really better, which is not to say life in Poland is below average in the world concept. In Western Europe you can be unemployed and you still have a comfortable life, with money to relax in a cafe every day. There not many places for immigrants, than Western Europe, that can be so comfortable, wealthy, luxury and easy. There is a reason a significant part of the world is trying to live there.

    Germans’ money, that otherwise would be spent on their anti-European population
     
    It's not like Poland is the least "anti-German" population for German taxpayers to give money to fund. You know the most rapid way to make a stereotypically culture habituated Polish people angry with them. Say "Poles are similar to Russians". And the second most rapid way? "Poles are similar to Germans".

    It’s not being a beggar when the money is compensation. If you smash my car and I demand that you pay for the damages I am not being a “beggar.”

     

    This could be argued if the money was only from Germany, but the convergence funding is from UK, France, Denmark, Netherlands, Belgium, Sweden. For many years, the taxpayers of all the wealthy EU countries, have been used for the convergence funding, which Poland is the greatest receiver.


    https://i.imgur.com/uoGkp44.jpg

    It's not Netherlands or United Kingdom, are responsible for the crimes of Hitler. They lost large part of London fighting against Hitler, which began as the response for Germany's invasion of Poland, while Hitler had always wanted and expected peace with the Kingdom.

    Replies: @Dmitry, @AP

    , @sher singh
    @AP

    Your racialism and zero-sum thinking will get you punched in Canada.
    People immigrating, paying taxes & working isn't genocide & forced conversion ala Natives.
    ---
    Self-referencing as European is a Ukrainian or Balkanoid thing.
    Both places without much of a history outside Turkish harems.

    https://dharmicreality.wordpress.com/2022/05/15/mapping-the-western-right-from-a-varnashrama-lens/


    This “Nazi” faction mostly ignore caste differences and focus on the racial aspects (Shudras of whatever race, being at the lowest end of the caste ladder, prefer to ignore their lowly caste status within their race and focus on other aspects).
     
    You should show some class, and stfu. English Canada is mostly Scottish not Anglo.
    Hongcouver is a playful nickname, go back to worshipping Germans & their poo inspection toilets.

    https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/945650720026267658/1034666218554142721/unknown-144.png

    Replies: @AP

    , @silviosilver
    @AP


    Once upon a time the British Europeans displaced the native Indians and now the cycle continues and the Chinese and Asian Indians have displaced the British Europeans,
     
    Lol, as I never tire of pointing out, the racial bullshit never ceases with this mendacious worm.

    The "cycle continues", you see. It's just a natural part of the rhythm of life. Has nothing to do with, you know, deliberate fucking policy.

    I must say it's interesting the way AP gets off on taunting the very people he is most relying on to aid his precious Ukraine. The extreme butthurt he feels - let's face it, it's gotta hurt for a prideful Uke to think his country could soon be outclassed by even the lowly pajeets of hindoostan - makes him say very weird and very spiteful things.

    Replies: @sher singh, @AP, @LatW, @Wokechoke

  219. @Mikhail
    @A123

    He's very much a willing figurehead as he could resign as a form of protest. That he goes along on his role as president makes him culpable.

    Replies: @A123

    Do you really believe that this guy is running Ukraine? Really? Not-The-President Biden cannot even walk away from a podium. There is no leadership there.

    He’s very much a willing figurehead as he could resign as a form of protest. That he goes along on his role as president makes him culpable.

    The Veggie-In-Chief can only resign if he knows he is theoretically President. Based on his cognitive performance, I suspect he does NOT know. He is that far gone.
    ___

    Mike_from_Russia shared this in #199. Start at 1:14 if the auto advance does not work.

    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-199/#comment-5613131

    It is much more on target as to who is running Zelensky’s regime.

    PEACE 😇

    • Replies: @LatW
    @A123

    Ofc, there are legitimate questions about who is running our "regimes" (clearly, some have more influence than they should), but about the cartoon -- if this is how the Russians (rossiyane) now want to view Ukrainians, then so be it (we already knew how the Russian Jews who made this cartoon view all EE gentiles so there are no surprises there). It just means there will never be friendship again for generations. But this cartoon is not even accurate - the door is not closed on the EU, since Olaf Scholz just yesterday, when speaking of generating a new Marshall plan for Ukraine, mentioned the possibility of the EU membership for Ukraine. If Scholz said that, then it is meaningful and has some weight now.

    Second, those Soviet monuments that are featured in the video: at least one of those monuments that have the Ukrainian colors painted over it, that was done by the locals, not the Ukrainian refugees. A bunch of locals in one EE country painted Ukrainian colors over a Soviet monument to protest Russia's invasion into Ukraine.

    Replies: @A123, @Dmitry

  220. @songbird
    @S

    That Twilight Zone episode almost seems quaint now.

    Globalization and inflation have made the issue less straight forward. I see the elites as incompetents, but, if they had planned to set the stage for automation, IMO, they couldn't have done it better.

    What I heard is that there a plants that make blue jeans in America that are completely automated now. But are they replacing American workers, or merely reshoring? From the nationalist perspective what is better, to have your textile industry based in Bangladesh or Ethiopia, or to have machines make it domestically? To have Mexican truckers drive right across the border, or to have robo-trucks? I'll admit the answers aren't clear to me, even as I believe that automation is the one hope of preserving lifestyles in the West.

    Recently, I wondered what the first scifi story was that predicted machines that did all the tasks, and caused men to become listless, or even to devolve. I read a memorable one a week or two ago from Project Gutenburg that had a alien race that became brainless caged slugs attended by their super-advanced machines.

    Replies: @A123, @S

    Recently, I wondered what the first scifi story was that predicted machines that did all the tasks, and caused men to become listless, or even to devolve.

    That’s a good question. I wouldn’t know. I imagen they go back quite aways.

    I read a memorable one a week or two ago from Project Gutenburg that had a alien race that became brainless caged slugs attended by their super-advanced machines.

    Sounds a little bit like now with so many folks unhealthy attachment to ‘social media’. Also sounds a like the 1909 short story The Machine Stops

    The story, set in a world where humanity lives underground and relies on a giant machine to provide its needs, predicted technologies similar to instant messaging and the Internet.

    The story describes a world in which most of the human population has lost the ability to live on the surface of the Earth. Each individual now lives in isolation below ground in a standard room, with all bodily and spiritual needs met by the omnipotent, global Machine. Travel is permitted, but is unpopular and rarely necessary. Communication is made via a kind of instant messaging/video conferencing machine with which people conduct their only activity: the sharing of ideas and what passes for knowledge.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Machine_Stops

    • Thanks: A123, songbird
    • Replies: @Barbarossa
    @S


    Also sounds a like the 1909 short story The Machine Stops
     
    That was the one I was going to throw out there. I really like that story for it's very prescient view of where we seem to be headed; not in the technological particulars necessarily but certainly in spirit.
  221. @Coconuts
    @Dmitry


    Because within the EU system, significant parts of the populations of Eastern European countries emigrate to Western Europe. There is no significant emigration of Western Europeans to live in Poland, but there are millions of Poles emigrating to Western Europe. But this is because the life is better on average significantly in Western Europe, often to say mildly.
     
    I heard one commentator (Ed West) say that Poland is predicted to have a higher GDP per capita than the UK in 15 years time. I'm not sure how accurate the prediction is, but the continued rise of the Poland and decline of the UK due to Brazilification effects doesn't seem impossible.

    Replies: @AP, @Dmitry

    Yes, if GDP per capita in both Poland and the UK maintain the same pace in the next 15 years as they have in the past 15 years they will converge.

    I was very impressed by how nice rural Poland was when I visited in April. It wasn’t only physically beautiful but also prosperous. Those villages certainly had nicer, larger, and better maintained houses than I’ve seen in rural Maine or Appalachia! I suspect rural England is also worse.

    I am told this is because a lot of the rural Polish owners had spent years working in the West and sent the money back, to build their dream homes. Eastern Poland where I was had the highest rate of such pioneers, choosing to live and work in the West which is worse in most ways but better in one way (high income) for awhile.

    • Replies: @Bashibuzuk
    @AP


    Poland is the largest beneficiary of EU funding. Between 2007 and 2013 our country received over 67 billion EUR from the EU’s budget. [....] Between 2014 and 2020 our country will jointly receive EUR 105.8 billion from the EU’s budget - EUR 72.9 billion for the cohesion policy and EUR 28.5 billion for agricultural policy. It means almost 4 billion euro more than Poland received from the previous EU budget.
     
    https://www.paih.gov.pl/why_poland/eu_funds#:~:text=Poland%20is%20the%20largest%20beneficiary,and%20the%20country's%20Eastern%20regions.

    Today, the European Commission has approved Poland’s and EU’s largest cohesion policy programme: ‘European Funds for Infrastructure, Climate and Environment 2021-2027’. EU funding under this programme will amount to more than EUR 24.1 billion (EUR 12.9 billion from the European Regional Development Fund and EUR 11.2 billion from the Cohesion Fund).
     
    https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/newsroom/news/2022/10/10-06-2022-eur-24-billion-worth-of-non-repayable-grants-from-the-eu-poland-s-largest-cohesion-policy-programme-approved-by-the-european-commission

    Two South Korean companies have signed a $5.76 billion contract with Poland to export tanks and howitzers, Seoul's arms procurement agency said on Saturday, after Warsaw agreed to ramp up arms imports amid tensions with Russia.
     
    https://www.reuters.com/world/south-korea-poland-sign-58-billion-tank-howitzer-contract-2022-08-27/

    Poland has completed its negotiations with South Korea to buy close to 300 K239 Chunmoo multiple-rocket launchers, with a contract expected to be signed during next week’s visit by Polish Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister Mariusz Błaszczak to Seoul.
     
    https://www.defensenews.com/global/europe/2022/10/14/poland-to-buy-hundreds-of-s-korean-chunmoo-multiple-rocket-launchers/



    https://img.nzz.ch/2022/08/17/3e7ac764-bcd7-4fc8-8047-0a499e812fc1.jpeg

    https://www.allkpop.com/upload/2022/03/content/091507/1646856475-untitled-1.jpg

    Replies: @LatW

  222. After becoming president, Zelensky contradicted himself in a way that includes his saying that people in Ukraine who want to speak Russian and feel kinship towards Russia should leave. They should leave the land of their forefathers on account of a shyster politician?

    It’s not unusual for politicians to change some of their views and stances once they asume power. Zelensky was brought up in one of those Russian speaking families in Southern Ukraine, therefore I think that he knows more about these sorts of things than somebody born and raised in New York.

    The Banderite aim of having their view dominate over others is a recipe for not keeping that boundary together as a separate entity from Russia.

    There you go again, labeling any pro-Ukrainian point of view as being “Banderite”. This is very disingenuous of you and makes it hard to reason with people of your ilk who only see things in black and white colors. Zelensky has never been a Banderite nor is he one today.

  223. It’s not unusual for politicians to change some of their views and stances once they asume power. Zelensky was brought up in one of those Russian speaking families in Southern Ukraine, therefore I think that he know more about these sorts of things than somebody born and raised in New York.

    How rich as the the above excerpted comes from somebody born and raised in the US.

    There you go again, labeling any pro-Ukrainian point of view as being “Banderite”. This is very disingenuous of you and makes it hard to reason with people of your ilk who only see things in black and white colors. Zelensky has never been a Banderite nor is he one today.

    Zelensky is on record for saying that it’s cool to support Bandera, in line with how some North American establishment Ukes say they don’t support Bandera, while simultaneously working with known pro-Bandera folks and supporting the censorship against pro-Russian views. There’s also Zelensky’s previously mentioned flip flop on going from saying that Russians and Ukrainians are the same people and that Russian language use should be respected to the exact opposite upon becoming president – indicative of the disproportionate pro-Bandera clout in Kiev regime controlled Ukraine.

  224. @sudden death
    @AnonfromTN


    RT stopped working with
     
    Haven't seen anything about him being fired officially, the only thing regarding terminating his work was Simonyan quite vaguely writing "at the current moment Ï'm suspending our cooperation" (На данный момент я останавливаю наше сотрудничество), which could be interpreted widely or narrowly if one wishes, but imho we''ll see or hear him again quite soon in Kremlin's various brand medias.

    https://t.me/margaritasimonyan/12361

    Replies: @Mikhail

    The Russian government is also looking into his views falling in line with being extremist.

    https://www.rt.com/news/565236-rt-host-krasovsky-investigated/

    • Replies: @Mikhail
    @Mikhail

    As a comparison to the Kiev regime -



    https://twitter.com/Ukraine66251776/status/1584821172424052737

    , @LatW
    @Mikhail

    This will not fool anyone. We heard everything this degenerate (who throws coke parties for his diverse male friends) and his colleagues were saying for months. They are channeling how a large part of vatniks truly feel. These vipers need to be cleaned out and real high class Russians need to be put in their place.

    Replies: @LatW

  225. @Mikhail
    @sudden death

    The Russian government is also looking into his views falling in line with being extremist.

    https://www.rt.com/news/565236-rt-host-krasovsky-investigated/

    Replies: @Mikhail, @LatW

    As a comparison to the Kiev regime –

    [MORE]

  226. https://www.rt.com/russia/565293-motor-sich-head-arrested/

    Ukraine arrests head of aerospace giant over alleged Russia links; Vyacheslav Boguslaev, now in pre-trial detention, is suspected of supplying parts to Moscow.

    • Replies: @AnonfromTN
    @Emil Nikola Richard

    If you take the word of Ukies at face value, there are two categories of Ukraine officials: agents of Putin and agents of Kremlin.

  227. Suella Braverman heading up Downing Street – she had asked to be home secretary again and source told @PippaCrerar and @breeallegretti that she will be back there

    Suella Braverman returns as home secretary

    Downing Street has announced Suella Braverman’s reappointment as home secretary, less than a week after she was forced to resign from the role.

    If you wish to be amused, open [MORE] and read the tweet replies.

    The SJW Globalists thought they had gotten rid of Braverman. Her return is causing Leftoids to totally lose their gourd.
    ___

    The Guardian has a live blog of the announcements if you are looking for a specific posting. (1)

    Why the Heck does the UK have a post for “Secretary of Levelling Up“?
    • When did this happen?
    • And, and even more important, what does this functionary do?

    Does he advance MMO Warcraft characters for the rest of the Cabinet?

      

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://www.theguardian.com/politics/live/2022/oct/25/uk-politics-live-sunak-to-meet-king-charles-and-give-first-address-to-the-nation-as-pm

    [MORE]

    • Replies: @Matra
    @A123


    The SJW Globalists thought they had gotten rid of Braverman. Her return is causing Leftoids to totally lose their gourd.
     
    For all we know the two Indians, Braverman and Sunak, plotted this together to expedite the Truss resignation.

    Replies: @A123

  228. @A123

    Suella Braverman heading up Downing Street - she had asked to be home secretary again and source told @PippaCrerar and @breeallegretti that she will be back there
     

    Suella Braverman returns as home secretary

    Downing Street has announced Suella Braverman’s reappointment as home secretary, less than a week after she was forced to resign from the role.
     

    If you wish to be amused, open [MORE] and read the tweet replies.

    The SJW Globalists thought they had gotten rid of Braverman. Her return is causing Leftoids to totally lose their gourd.
    ___

    The Guardian has a live blog of the announcements if you are looking for a specific posting. (1)

    Why the Heck does the UK have a post for "Secretary of Levelling Up"?
    • When did this happen?
    • And, and even more important, what does this functionary do?

    Does he advance MMO Warcraft characters for the rest of the Cabinet?

     
    https://i.etsystatic.com/12247273/r/il/9e2eb1/1687800581/il_794xN.1687800581_d2f5.jpg
     

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://www.theguardian.com/politics/live/2022/oct/25/uk-politics-live-sunak-to-meet-king-charles-and-give-first-address-to-the-nation-as-pm

    https://twitter.com/jessicaelgot/status/1584925640712753153?s=20

    https://twitter.com/10DowningStreet/status/1584937651492093952?s=20

    Replies: @Matra

    The SJW Globalists thought they had gotten rid of Braverman. Her return is causing Leftoids to totally lose their gourd.

    For all we know the two Indians, Braverman and Sunak, plotted this together to expedite the Truss resignation.

    • Replies: @A123
    @Matra



    The SJW Globalists thought they had gotten rid of Braverman. Her return is causing Leftoids to totally lose their gourd.

     

    For all we know the two Indians, Braverman and Sunak, plotted this together to expedite the Truss resignation.
     
    Despite her ancestry, Braverman is committed to spiking a special deal for India migration. She is also friendly with Nigel Farage. There is little doubt that her departure was an intentional effort to collapse Truss. Liz was trying to increase UK migration.

    Coordination seems unlikely. Sunak is from the opposite wing. He realizes the threat of immediate undermining by the Populists. Thus, Braverman was a necessary BREXIT loyalist pick to launch things forward.

    PEACE 😇

  229. @A123
    @Mikhail



    Do you really believe that this guy is running Ukraine? Really? Not-The-President Biden cannot even walk away from a podium. There is no leadership there.
     
    He’s very much a willing figurehead as he could resign as a form of protest. That he goes along on his role as president makes him culpable.
     
    The Veggie-In-Chief can only resign if he knows he is theoretically President. Based on his cognitive performance, I suspect he does NOT know. He is that far gone.
    ___

    Mike_from_Russia shared this in #199. Start at 1:14 if the auto advance does not work.

    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-199/#comment-5613131

    https://youtu.be/LLTyFMxgpCI?t=74

    It is much more on target as to who is running Zelensky's regime.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @LatW

    Ofc, there are legitimate questions about who is running our “regimes” (clearly, some have more influence than they should), but about the cartoon — if this is how the Russians (rossiyane) now want to view Ukrainians, then so be it (we already knew how the Russian Jews who made this cartoon view all EE gentiles so there are no surprises there). It just means there will never be friendship again for generations. But this cartoon is not even accurate – the door is not closed on the EU, since Olaf Scholz just yesterday, when speaking of generating a new Marshall plan for Ukraine, mentioned the possibility of the EU membership for Ukraine. If Scholz said that, then it is meaningful and has some weight now.

    Second, those Soviet monuments that are featured in the video: at least one of those monuments that have the Ukrainian colors painted over it, that was done by the locals, not the Ukrainian refugees. A bunch of locals in one EE country painted Ukrainian colors over a Soviet monument to protest Russia’s invasion into Ukraine.

    • Replies: @A123
    @LatW


    the Russian Jews who made this cartoon
     
    Do you have any proof for this?

    Cherubs are very Old Testament. However the blonde haired, blue eyed imagery is a much later & distinctly Christian motif. There were other bits of uniquely Christian imagery.

    Pigs are an unusual choice for Jewish productions, even as a the villain. Swastikas are exceedingly inflammatory.


    view all EE gentiles so there are no surprises there). It just means there will never be friendship again for generations.
     
    The Russian Poland problem has existed for decades. It does not necessarily spread to other EE countries.

    There is no reason to believe that Russians (Christian or Jewish) dislike EE Hungary. Belarus fits most definitions of EE. Does Serbia qualify as EE?

    There is no evidence to back up your wild assertion.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @LatW

    , @Dmitry
    @LatW

    The cartoon, which would have been funny if it was posted last year, not funny this year, obviously has no relation to Israel.

    She's even becoming angry people are saying her cartoons are from Israel. https://t.me/s/svinkavobmoroke

  230. Boutkevich’s platform should appeal to our very own Beckow. Seriously. 🙂

  231. @Mikhail
    @sudden death

    The Russian government is also looking into his views falling in line with being extremist.

    https://www.rt.com/news/565236-rt-host-krasovsky-investigated/

    Replies: @Mikhail, @LatW

    This will not fool anyone. We heard everything this degenerate (who throws coke parties for his diverse male friends) and his colleagues were saying for months. They are channeling how a large part of vatniks truly feel. These vipers need to be cleaned out and real high class Russians need to be put in their place.

    • Replies: @LatW
    @LatW

    And what he said was actually more misanthropic than what was translated into the Western press. When he called on murdering Ukrainian children, he was referencing the song "Plyne Kacha" (The Duckling swam), he was saying "Do it like in that song...". The song is about a mother pining after her dead son. It's a very deep, heartbreaking elegy. Seriously, does it even get worse than that...

  232. @LatW
    @Mikhail

    This will not fool anyone. We heard everything this degenerate (who throws coke parties for his diverse male friends) and his colleagues were saying for months. They are channeling how a large part of vatniks truly feel. These vipers need to be cleaned out and real high class Russians need to be put in their place.

    Replies: @LatW

    And what he said was actually more misanthropic than what was translated into the Western press. When he called on murdering Ukrainian children, he was referencing the song “Plyne Kacha” (The Duckling swam), he was saying “Do it like in that song…”. The song is about a mother pining after her dead son. It’s a very deep, heartbreaking elegy. Seriously, does it even get worse than that…

  233. @Matra
    @A123


    The SJW Globalists thought they had gotten rid of Braverman. Her return is causing Leftoids to totally lose their gourd.
     
    For all we know the two Indians, Braverman and Sunak, plotted this together to expedite the Truss resignation.

    Replies: @A123

    The SJW Globalists thought they had gotten rid of Braverman. Her return is causing Leftoids to totally lose their gourd.

    For all we know the two Indians, Braverman and Sunak, plotted this together to expedite the Truss resignation.

    Despite her ancestry, Braverman is committed to spiking a special deal for India migration. She is also friendly with Nigel Farage. There is little doubt that her departure was an intentional effort to collapse Truss. Liz was trying to increase UK migration.

    Coordination seems unlikely. Sunak is from the opposite wing. He realizes the threat of immediate undermining by the Populists. Thus, Braverman was a necessary BREXIT loyalist pick to launch things forward.

    PEACE 😇

  234. @LatW
    @A123

    Ofc, there are legitimate questions about who is running our "regimes" (clearly, some have more influence than they should), but about the cartoon -- if this is how the Russians (rossiyane) now want to view Ukrainians, then so be it (we already knew how the Russian Jews who made this cartoon view all EE gentiles so there are no surprises there). It just means there will never be friendship again for generations. But this cartoon is not even accurate - the door is not closed on the EU, since Olaf Scholz just yesterday, when speaking of generating a new Marshall plan for Ukraine, mentioned the possibility of the EU membership for Ukraine. If Scholz said that, then it is meaningful and has some weight now.

    Second, those Soviet monuments that are featured in the video: at least one of those monuments that have the Ukrainian colors painted over it, that was done by the locals, not the Ukrainian refugees. A bunch of locals in one EE country painted Ukrainian colors over a Soviet monument to protest Russia's invasion into Ukraine.

    Replies: @A123, @Dmitry

    the Russian Jews who made this cartoon

    Do you have any proof for this?

    Cherubs are very Old Testament. However the blonde haired, blue eyed imagery is a much later & distinctly Christian motif. There were other bits of uniquely Christian imagery.

    Pigs are an unusual choice for Jewish productions, even as a the villain. Swastikas are exceedingly inflammatory.

    view all EE gentiles so there are no surprises there). It just means there will never be friendship again for generations.

    The Russian Poland problem has existed for decades. It does not necessarily spread to other EE countries.

    There is no reason to believe that Russians (Christian or Jewish) dislike EE Hungary. Belarus fits most definitions of EE. Does Serbia qualify as EE?

    There is no evidence to back up your wild assertion.

    PEACE 😇

    • Replies: @LatW
    @A123


    Do you have any proof for this?
     
    It's straight up obvious, in your face.

    Pigs are an unusual choice
     
    How would you like it if your people were portrayed as pigs?

    There is no reason to believe that Russians (Christian or Jewish) dislike EE Hungary. Belarus fits most definitions of EE. Does Serbia qualify as EE?
     
    I wasn't talking about those countries. But if you want to continue to be blind, it's your choice.

    Replies: @A123

  235. @A123
    @LatW


    the Russian Jews who made this cartoon
     
    Do you have any proof for this?

    Cherubs are very Old Testament. However the blonde haired, blue eyed imagery is a much later & distinctly Christian motif. There were other bits of uniquely Christian imagery.

    Pigs are an unusual choice for Jewish productions, even as a the villain. Swastikas are exceedingly inflammatory.


    view all EE gentiles so there are no surprises there). It just means there will never be friendship again for generations.
     
    The Russian Poland problem has existed for decades. It does not necessarily spread to other EE countries.

    There is no reason to believe that Russians (Christian or Jewish) dislike EE Hungary. Belarus fits most definitions of EE. Does Serbia qualify as EE?

    There is no evidence to back up your wild assertion.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @LatW

    Do you have any proof for this?

    It’s straight up obvious, in your face.

    Pigs are an unusual choice

    How would you like it if your people were portrayed as pigs?

    There is no reason to believe that Russians (Christian or Jewish) dislike EE Hungary. Belarus fits most definitions of EE. Does Serbia qualify as EE?

    I wasn’t talking about those countries. But if you want to continue to be blind, it’s your choice.

    • Replies: @A123
    @LatW



    Do you have any proof for this?
     
    It’s straight up obvious, in your face.
     
    It is obviously animated by someone with Christian leanings.

    This is 100% obvious. So obvious, it is in your face.


    Pigs are an unusual choice
     
    How would you like it if your people were portrayed as pigs?
     
    There is a huge back history of antisemitism tied to pig depictions. For example, the "Jew-Pig" found in Germany (1). The last thing they wasn't to do is encourage this sort of artistry.

    This is so obvious, it is in your face.



    we already knew how the Russian Jews who made this cartoon view all EE
     
    There is no reason to believe that Russians (Christian or Jewish) dislike EE Hungary. Belarus fits most definitions of EE. Does Serbia qualify as EE?
     
    I wasn’t talking about those countries. But if you want to continue to be blind, it’s your choice.
     
    You introduced the term EE. What specialized, non-standard meaning did you keep secret?

    The need to define terms that you are using should be clear. Indeed...

    This is so obvious, it is in your face.

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://www.timesofisrael.com/german-church-covers-anti-semitic-jew-pig-sculpture-it-was-forced-to-keep/

    Replies: @Dmitry

  236. @Thulean Friend
    Congrats to Rishi Sunak for becoming British PM. Indians are playing the long game, demographically infiltrating elite circles in key Western countries instead of trying to build up national strength á la China. Perhaps the smarter long-term strategy.

    Replies: @A123, @silviosilver, @Barbarossa, @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms, @Dmitry, @songbird

    They should have stuck to women of ill repute like Truss and cosmopolitan, r-selected, bastard-spawning mutts like BoJo. It’s a mistake to put an obviously alien face on the regime, when so many willing passables would serve.

    Having an Indian PM will only increase the pressure to have a black one. They will need to mix it up – it wouldn’t do to have a string of Indian ones , and color-signaling compels them.

    How long before a black PM starts using the word “racist”, or before Sunak himself is caught using it? Or before they start lecturing about colonialism?

    • Replies: @AnonfromTN
    @songbird

    What ails you? A fitting PM for formerly great formerly Britain

    , @sher singh
    @songbird

    Only makes sense after Ireland & Portugal. Blacks & Indians occupy v dif place in Britain tbh,
    Rooftop Koreans didn't lead to a karen meltdown..


    At the unveiling, Freud, an octogenarian by this point, with advancing Alzheimer’s, kept forgetting what was going on.

    “Who are these people?” he asked Pragnell. Around the table, everyone was pretending to talk while in fact listening to what he was saying.

    “They’re officers of the household cavalry,” Pragnell replied.

    “So why is there a negro here?” Freud asked.

    You could hear a pin drop. All at once, the whole awkwardness of the regiment’s diversity experiment was dragged into the open; the fundamental weirdness of “we’ve got two women and two black guys but we’re still posh” was exposed.
     
    https://unherd.com/2022/10/the-british-army-has-a-class-problem/

    He'd probably tell war stories of fighting beside Sikhs, OTOH.
    , @Coconuts
    @songbird


    How long before a black PM starts using the word “racist”, or before Sunak himself is caught using it? Or before they start lecturing about colonialism?
     
    After seeing some of the hostile reactions from various British race grifters and racial revolution types I can see the logic behind having him as PM.

    Senior people in the Tory party must know about the demographic issue, more obvious among the younger age groups and it is sort of baked in or inevitable now, so it is better to get out in front of it and reduce the political capital progressives can make out of race issues. This might be better for long political stability. Also he seems likely to be more competent on running the economy than Truss and Kwarteng.
  237. Would Hu have been removed, if Biden were thirty years younger?

    • Replies: @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    @songbird

    It's hard to get good read. Hu "Tiger of Lhasa" Jintao probably did have Alzheimer's. He along with Li and Hu Chunhua are members of the Communist Youth League faction "Tuanpai". Both "Red Aristocrats" or Princelings (ex Xi himself) and Tuanpai were left off of PSC.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Princelings

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuanpai

    These are the main two factions are analogous the Qing-era Manchu-Mongol aristocrats and Han meritocratic scholar-officials. All the new PSC members came from plebeian background not in the two factions. Which is a pretty bold move for Xi.

    On PRC emigration, it's not only AUKUS and Europe. There are a million Chinese each in Japan and SK. And I don't think any Russian males tried to escape the general mobilization to China.

  238. @Coconuts
    @Dmitry


    Because within the EU system, significant parts of the populations of Eastern European countries emigrate to Western Europe. There is no significant emigration of Western Europeans to live in Poland, but there are millions of Poles emigrating to Western Europe. But this is because the life is better on average significantly in Western Europe, often to say mildly.
     
    I heard one commentator (Ed West) say that Poland is predicted to have a higher GDP per capita than the UK in 15 years time. I'm not sure how accurate the prediction is, but the continued rise of the Poland and decline of the UK due to Brazilification effects doesn't seem impossible.

    Replies: @AP, @Dmitry

    Germany’s economy is merging Poland as their lower cost production center while wealthy EU countries transfer hundreds of billions of dollars to Poland for “convergence funding”.

    EU’s concept is all EU countries should be viewed as a single country, which should increase equality until convergence. So, taxpayers in wealthy countries should transfer to poor countries, until there is “convergence”.

    For countries like Poland, there might always be the limit for convergence to their neighbor, as the great companies, engineers and most talented workers, technology, will be mostly German (or another elite country).

    Siemens, Volkswagen, Bosch or Daimler, can outsource factories to Poland for lower costs, but the larger basis of the corporations’ success is not the lower cost production area, is more related to the German engineering culture, education and management.

    There could be more space for convergence by the EU, but Poland will perhaps not go to German levels, without undermining much of the reason for the investment in Poland. (I know there is the example of the data from Ireland, but this is a small tax haven for the multinational corporations, the reduction of cost is because of the competitive tax and regulation environment, not from lower economic level).

    continued rise of the Poland and decline of the UK due to Brazilification effects doesn’t seem impossible

    UK’s “Brazification” is importing the wealthiest people in the world and skilled gastarbeiters, with postcolonial working classes.

    Maybe there are some similar effects, but I don’t think it really like the process in Brazil (which imported ordinary people, while the colonial elite became just more wealthy), although it could contribute to increasing inequality and cultural damage.

    This internationalization increasing the net wealth level in the UK and creating more of a clique of the ultra-wealthy internationalized people who are controlling the country, which the new leader is an example, although born in the Kingdom, he is married to a wealthy woman that is directly Indian.

    Maybe not such a future for the local culture, but somehow you can doubt that the wealthy of the world will be establishing in Poland. Although for all kinds of other reasons Poland could rise to 50% of UK’s GDP per capita this decade?

    • Replies: @Coconuts
    @Dmitry


    For countries like Poland, there might always be the limit for convergence to their neighbor, as the great companies, engineers and most talented workers, technology, will be mostly German (or another elite country).
     
    Will Germany continue to be as elite in the future?

    UK’s “Brazification” is importing the wealthiest people in the world and skilled gastarbeiters, with postcolonial working classes.
     
    Afaik Brazilification is a term from the US, the French have a variant 'Algerification', where a country's social structure comes to resemble that of colonial Algeria, but it has less recognition.

    If the country contains many of the world's richest, yet its production of wealth each year will only be similar to Poland's, it seems to be an indication that an Algeria-like social structure is the future. Given the highly wealthy minority are likely to produce a disproportionate portion of this GDP, the low productivity tendency in the rest of the economy and population must be set to continue.

    Many of the gastarbeiters and their families are surely future citizens, and iirc the qualifications needed to become one are now education to age 18, nowadays this is no longer a very high level.


    Maybe not such a future for the local culture, but somehow you can doubt that the wealthy of the world will be establishing in Poland.
     
    At the moment I am unconvinced of the value of an achievement like this. Isn't it like making the status of elite country dependent on where comprador elites choose to keep their wealth?

    Replies: @Dmitry

  239. @LatW
    @A123

    Ofc, there are legitimate questions about who is running our "regimes" (clearly, some have more influence than they should), but about the cartoon -- if this is how the Russians (rossiyane) now want to view Ukrainians, then so be it (we already knew how the Russian Jews who made this cartoon view all EE gentiles so there are no surprises there). It just means there will never be friendship again for generations. But this cartoon is not even accurate - the door is not closed on the EU, since Olaf Scholz just yesterday, when speaking of generating a new Marshall plan for Ukraine, mentioned the possibility of the EU membership for Ukraine. If Scholz said that, then it is meaningful and has some weight now.

    Second, those Soviet monuments that are featured in the video: at least one of those monuments that have the Ukrainian colors painted over it, that was done by the locals, not the Ukrainian refugees. A bunch of locals in one EE country painted Ukrainian colors over a Soviet monument to protest Russia's invasion into Ukraine.

    Replies: @A123, @Dmitry

    The cartoon, which would have been funny if it was posted last year, not funny this year, obviously has no relation to Israel.

    She’s even becoming angry people are saying her cartoons are from Israel. https://t.me/s/svinkavobmoroke

    • Thanks: A123
  240. @LatW
    @A123


    Do you have any proof for this?
     
    It's straight up obvious, in your face.

    Pigs are an unusual choice
     
    How would you like it if your people were portrayed as pigs?

    There is no reason to believe that Russians (Christian or Jewish) dislike EE Hungary. Belarus fits most definitions of EE. Does Serbia qualify as EE?
     
    I wasn't talking about those countries. But if you want to continue to be blind, it's your choice.

    Replies: @A123

    Do you have any proof for this?

    It’s straight up obvious, in your face.

    It is obviously animated by someone with Christian leanings.

    This is 100% obvious. So obvious, it is in your face.

    Pigs are an unusual choice

    How would you like it if your people were portrayed as pigs?

    There is a huge back history of antisemitism tied to pig depictions. For example, the “Jew-Pig” found in Germany (1). The last thing they wasn’t to do is encourage this sort of artistry.

    This is so obvious, it is in your face.

    we already knew how the Russian Jews who made this cartoon view all EE

    There is no reason to believe that Russians (Christian or Jewish) dislike EE Hungary. Belarus fits most definitions of EE. Does Serbia qualify as EE?

    I wasn’t talking about those countries. But if you want to continue to be blind, it’s your choice.

    You introduced the term EE. What specialized, non-standard meaning did you keep secret?

    The need to define terms that you are using should be clear. Indeed…

    This is so obvious, it is in your face.

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://www.timesofisrael.com/german-church-covers-anti-semitic-jew-pig-sculpture-it-was-forced-to-keep/

    • Replies: @Dmitry
    @A123

    It is pro-government telegram channels. A pro-government telegram channel they use to try to influence Israel has posted her cartoon. https://t.me/s/ukroterror2 Then it was viral with the informal social media/pro-government channels in Russia.

    They said it was from a far-right religious (I guess funded by American settler groups, with support for Trump) media which could have the same INN acronym in English, which reply to say they are not associated.
    https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/361603

    You can doubt a topic of Ukraine's hopes for EU integration and need to be "rescued by" Russian government, would be interesting for media of far-right religious Zionist settlers sitting between olive trees in the Jordan Valley and conflict with Palestinian militants.

    Replies: @A123

  241. @AP
    @Dmitry


    Poor countries “demanding money” from rich countries, is apparently something which you see as positive about the poor countries
     
    It depends on the nature and context of the demands.

    If Germany chooses to give away hundreds of $ millions to non-European “refugees” it is good of a European people to divert some of the Germans’ money, that otherwise would be spent on their anti-European population replacement project, towards other Europeans for a change.


    So, better (not in moral sense) to be beggar, than the person who gives to the beggar

     

    It’s not being a beggar when the money is compensation. If you smash my car and I demand that you pay for the damages I am not being a “beggar.”

    There is no significant emigration of Western Europeans to live in Poland, but there are millions of Poles emigrating to Western Europe. But this is because the life is better on average significantly in Western Europe
     
    No, it’s not because life is necessarily better but because more money can be made and some people sacrifice years of their lives in order to provide better material circumstances for their families. Poland is a very nice and pleasant place but incomes are a lot higher in the West so some people move there.

    It’s increasing the internationalization or multinationalism of Canada, whether you view as good or bad. If it becomes like Singapore in the utopian example, or like Balkans/Lebanon in the dystopian.

     

    It depends on who emigrates. It will be like Singapore if it’s a massive wave of Chinese and South Asians. Parts that have been flooded already, have earned the nickname Hongcouver. In this city the middle and upper classes are mostly well dressed Chinese from Hong Kong, with some Whites and upper caste Indians and Sikhs mixed in. There is a large mass of mostly White, and a few Native, heroin junkies. The district with junkies has much more pre-Asian people (of native European and native Indian descent) than the nicer parts of the city. Once upon a time the British Europeans displaced the native Indians and now the cycle continues and the Chinese and Asian Indians have displaced the British Europeans, who have joined the native Indians in the impoverished margins.*

    There aren’t enough Balkan and Lebanese immigrants to make Canada another Lebanon or Balkans.

    Mass Ukrainian immigration wouldn’t save Canada’s British heritage (the Anglo Canadians have chosen to destroy it themselves, as Anglos do), but would at least keep the place more European.

    *At least, this is the impression I got from spending a few days in downtown Vancouver, a beautiful and wealthy Chinese city, made of green and blue glass, whose Chinese residents are mostly like civilized Chinese from Hong Kong or Singapore rather than Sovok-like mainlanders, where European people and Native Indians dress in rags, use drugs and beg for money. I think there are normal Europeans living out in many of the suburbs to which they have retreated.

    Replies: @Dmitry, @sher singh, @silviosilver

    Vancouver.. Sovok

    Although much of the property wealth in Vancouver will not be so far from the Chinese Communist Party and a lot closer to it, than the ordinary Chinese people living in China. They are often children of the political elite in China, as the wealth in China and the connection to the communist party are not so uncorrelated. I posted the link a bit for repetitive, but to apologize for the repetition, remember the great report on YouTube about the movement of wealth from China to Vancouver https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IZs2i3Bpx.

    would at least keep the place more European.

    It depends what kind of “European”. Ukraine is between Sierra Leone and Zambia in the corruption perceptions index.

    Obviously, Canada filters immigrants, so there will be reduction of such cultural transfer by immigrants, but for EU, which introduces the open border system. EU citizens would have open borders, without filtration, from this zone of geographical Europe which is exactly not culturally the brand image of “enlightened Europe”.

    life is necessarily better but because more money can be made

    Life generally is really better, which is not to say life in Poland is below average in the world concept. In Western Europe you can be unemployed and you still have a comfortable life, with money to relax in a cafe every day. There not many places for immigrants, than Western Europe, that can be so comfortable, wealthy, luxury and easy. There is a reason a significant part of the world is trying to live there.

    Germans’ money, that otherwise would be spent on their anti-European population

    It’s not like Poland is the least “anti-German” population for German taxpayers to give money to fund. You know the most rapid way to make a stereotypically culture habituated Polish people angry with them. Say “Poles are similar to Russians”. And the second most rapid way? “Poles are similar to Germans”.

    It’s not being a beggar when the money is compensation. If you smash my car and I demand that you pay for the damages I am not being a “beggar.”

    This could be argued if the money was only from Germany, but the convergence funding is from UK, France, Denmark, Netherlands, Belgium, Sweden. For many years, the taxpayers of all the wealthy EU countries, have been used for the convergence funding, which Poland is the greatest receiver.

    It’s not Netherlands or United Kingdom, are responsible for the crimes of Hitler. They lost large part of London fighting against Hitler, which began as the response for Germany’s invasion of Poland, while Hitler had always wanted and expected peace with the Kingdom.

    • Replies: @Dmitry
    @Dmitry


    great report on YouTube about the movement of wealth from China to Vancouver https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IZs2i3Bpx.

     

    Sorry the link is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IZs2i3Bpxx4.
    , @AP
    @Dmitry


    Although much of the property wealth in Vancouver will not be so far from the Chinese Communist Party and a lot closer to it, than the ordinary Chinese people living in China
     
    Maybe so, but most of the settlers have been Hong King Chinese fleeing CCP rule and not Chinese mainlanders. These crossed the ocean with suitcases filled with cash and drove up property prices. But I’m sure that we’ll connected relatives of Chinese Communist Party officials are involved in high level speculation also.

    would at least keep the place more European.

    It depends what kind of “European”. Ukraine is between Sierra Leone and Zambia in the corruption perceptions index
     

    I think you would not confuse Lviv or Vynnytsia with Zambia or Sierra Leone :-)

    life is necessarily better but because more money can be made

    Life generally is really better, which is not to say life in Poland
     

    Life is not generally worse in Krakow than in any German city, the latter’s only real advantage is higher income and related to that better and more retail stores. This is why many Poles go to Germany to work, but send the money back to Poland where they eventually return, because Poland is a better place to be ultimately. It is architecturally no worse, arts and culture great, food and restaurants are no worse, public transportation and roads are fine, but culture is more conservative and the place isn’t flooded by non-Europeans.

    In Western Europe you can be unemployed and you still have a comfortable life, with money to relax in a cafe every day
     
    This is true, but most Poles do not aspire to be unemployed.

    For many years, the taxpayers of all the wealthy EU countries, have been used for the convergence funding, which Poland is the greatest receiver
     
    From the chart you posted, it looks like per capita Poland is far from being the biggest receiver. A lot of that money goes to back to the western EU countries in the form of Poland consuming western EU goods?

    And again, Western Europe is so generous when it comes to giving money to non-European settlers in Western Europe. There is nothing shameful about eastern Europeans diverting some money to other Europeans, instead.

    If I were a German I would rather spend money upgrading a bus system in some Polish city than building houses for Syrian settlers in my city.

    Replies: @Dmitry

  242. @Dmitry
    @AP


    Vancouver.. Sovok

     

    Although much of the property wealth in Vancouver will not be so far from the Chinese Communist Party and a lot closer to it, than the ordinary Chinese people living in China. They are often children of the political elite in China, as the wealth in China and the connection to the communist party are not so uncorrelated. I posted the link a bit for repetitive, but to apologize for the repetition, remember the great report on YouTube about the movement of wealth from China to Vancouver https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IZs2i3Bpx.

    would at least keep the place more European.
     
    It depends what kind of "European". Ukraine is between Sierra Leone and Zambia in the corruption perceptions index.

    Obviously, Canada filters immigrants, so there will be reduction of such cultural transfer by immigrants, but for EU, which introduces the open border system. EU citizens would have open borders, without filtration, from this zone of geographical Europe which is exactly not culturally the brand image of "enlightened Europe".


    life is necessarily better but because more money can be made
     
    Life generally is really better, which is not to say life in Poland is below average in the world concept. In Western Europe you can be unemployed and you still have a comfortable life, with money to relax in a cafe every day. There not many places for immigrants, than Western Europe, that can be so comfortable, wealthy, luxury and easy. There is a reason a significant part of the world is trying to live there.

    Germans’ money, that otherwise would be spent on their anti-European population
     
    It's not like Poland is the least "anti-German" population for German taxpayers to give money to fund. You know the most rapid way to make a stereotypically culture habituated Polish people angry with them. Say "Poles are similar to Russians". And the second most rapid way? "Poles are similar to Germans".

    It’s not being a beggar when the money is compensation. If you smash my car and I demand that you pay for the damages I am not being a “beggar.”

     

    This could be argued if the money was only from Germany, but the convergence funding is from UK, France, Denmark, Netherlands, Belgium, Sweden. For many years, the taxpayers of all the wealthy EU countries, have been used for the convergence funding, which Poland is the greatest receiver.


    https://i.imgur.com/uoGkp44.jpg

    It's not Netherlands or United Kingdom, are responsible for the crimes of Hitler. They lost large part of London fighting against Hitler, which began as the response for Germany's invasion of Poland, while Hitler had always wanted and expected peace with the Kingdom.

    Replies: @Dmitry, @AP

    great report on YouTube about the movement of wealth from China to Vancouver https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IZs2i3Bpx.

    Sorry the link is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IZs2i3Bpxx4.

  243. “Progressives” on Russia-Ukraine – Latest Larry Johnson – RT Russian Civil War Article

    Among other things, the two shows below, go after the recent letter from “the squad”, which in actuality pretty much goes along with faulty neocon talking points:

    Not the kind of CIA experienced insight you get on CNN and MSNBC:

    In totality, the below RT article on the Russian Civil War goes against the simplistically inaccurate portrayal of the Whites getting foreign support to fight the Reds.

    Some key factors are notably omitted. They include the roles of Josef Pilsudski and Lloyd George, regarding Polish and Brit actions. Further below are my three articles concerning the two.

    https://www.rt.com/russia/565149-end-of-russian-civil-war/

    https://www.eurasiareview.com/08042016-fuzzy-history-how-poland-saved-the-world-from-russia-analysis/

    https://strategic-culture.org/news/2017/03/22/reexamining-russias-past/

    https://www.eurasiareview.com/22052011-pavlo-skoropadsky-and-the-course-of-russian-ukrainian-relations-analysis/

    • Replies: @silviosilver
    @Mikhail

    Not one, not two, but three useless new videos that realistically no one is going to watch. Well, I guess the page was loading too quickly, and something needed to be done about that, so thanks bro.

  244. @Mikhail
    "Progressives" on Russia-Ukraine - Latest Larry Johnson - RT Russian Civil War Article

    Among other things, the two shows below, go after the recent letter from "the squad", which in actuality pretty much goes along with faulty neocon talking points:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yPqPWP6znN4&t=10s

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nIZl8TivyeQ

    Not the kind of CIA experienced insight you get on CNN and MSNBC:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sndR-oS7NYo

    In totality, the below RT article on the Russian Civil War goes against the simplistically inaccurate portrayal of the Whites getting foreign support to fight the Reds.

    Some key factors are notably omitted. They include the roles of Josef Pilsudski and Lloyd George, regarding Polish and Brit actions. Further below are my three articles concerning the two.

    https://www.rt.com/russia/565149-end-of-russian-civil-war/

    https://www.eurasiareview.com/08042016-fuzzy-history-how-poland-saved-the-world-from-russia-analysis/

    https://strategic-culture.org/news/2017/03/22/reexamining-russias-past/

    https://www.eurasiareview.com/22052011-pavlo-skoropadsky-and-the-course-of-russian-ukrainian-relations-analysis/

    Replies: @silviosilver

    Not one, not two, but three useless new videos that realistically no one is going to watch. Well, I guess the page was loading too quickly, and something needed to be done about that, so thanks bro.

    • Agree: AP
    • LOL: sudden death
  245. @Emil Nikola Richard
    https://www.rt.com/russia/565293-motor-sich-head-arrested/

    Ukraine arrests head of aerospace giant over alleged Russia links; Vyacheslav Boguslaev, now in pre-trial detention, is suspected of supplying parts to Moscow.

    Replies: @AnonfromTN

    If you take the word of Ukies at face value, there are two categories of Ukraine officials: agents of Putin and agents of Kremlin.

  246. @songbird
    @Thulean Friend

    They should have stuck to women of ill repute like Truss and cosmopolitan, r-selected, bastard-spawning mutts like BoJo. It's a mistake to put an obviously alien face on the regime, when so many willing passables would serve.

    Having an Indian PM will only increase the pressure to have a black one. They will need to mix it up - it wouldn't do to have a string of Indian ones , and color-signaling compels them.

    How long before a black PM starts using the word "racist", or before Sunak himself is caught using it? Or before they start lecturing about colonialism?

    Replies: @AnonfromTN, @sher singh, @Coconuts

    What ails you? A fitting PM for formerly great formerly Britain

  247. @Coconuts
    @A123


    If Sunak goes full WEF, he could be the last Tory PM ever.
     
    I have heard various people speculating that this is what will happen. They are likely to lose all the 'red wall' seats again at least.

    Replies: @AnonfromTN

    You are naïve. I am not sure such a thing as fair elections exists (even if it ever existed, which is a big if). US elections of 2020 showed that the results are determined by fraud, how the electorate votes is irrelevant.

  248. sher singh says:
    @AP
    @Dmitry


    Poor countries “demanding money” from rich countries, is apparently something which you see as positive about the poor countries
     
    It depends on the nature and context of the demands.

    If Germany chooses to give away hundreds of $ millions to non-European “refugees” it is good of a European people to divert some of the Germans’ money, that otherwise would be spent on their anti-European population replacement project, towards other Europeans for a change.


    So, better (not in moral sense) to be beggar, than the person who gives to the beggar

     

    It’s not being a beggar when the money is compensation. If you smash my car and I demand that you pay for the damages I am not being a “beggar.”

    There is no significant emigration of Western Europeans to live in Poland, but there are millions of Poles emigrating to Western Europe. But this is because the life is better on average significantly in Western Europe
     
    No, it’s not because life is necessarily better but because more money can be made and some people sacrifice years of their lives in order to provide better material circumstances for their families. Poland is a very nice and pleasant place but incomes are a lot higher in the West so some people move there.

    It’s increasing the internationalization or multinationalism of Canada, whether you view as good or bad. If it becomes like Singapore in the utopian example, or like Balkans/Lebanon in the dystopian.

     

    It depends on who emigrates. It will be like Singapore if it’s a massive wave of Chinese and South Asians. Parts that have been flooded already, have earned the nickname Hongcouver. In this city the middle and upper classes are mostly well dressed Chinese from Hong Kong, with some Whites and upper caste Indians and Sikhs mixed in. There is a large mass of mostly White, and a few Native, heroin junkies. The district with junkies has much more pre-Asian people (of native European and native Indian descent) than the nicer parts of the city. Once upon a time the British Europeans displaced the native Indians and now the cycle continues and the Chinese and Asian Indians have displaced the British Europeans, who have joined the native Indians in the impoverished margins.*

    There aren’t enough Balkan and Lebanese immigrants to make Canada another Lebanon or Balkans.

    Mass Ukrainian immigration wouldn’t save Canada’s British heritage (the Anglo Canadians have chosen to destroy it themselves, as Anglos do), but would at least keep the place more European.

    *At least, this is the impression I got from spending a few days in downtown Vancouver, a beautiful and wealthy Chinese city, made of green and blue glass, whose Chinese residents are mostly like civilized Chinese from Hong Kong or Singapore rather than Sovok-like mainlanders, where European people and Native Indians dress in rags, use drugs and beg for money. I think there are normal Europeans living out in many of the suburbs to which they have retreated.

    Replies: @Dmitry, @sher singh, @silviosilver

    Your racialism and zero-sum thinking will get you punched in Canada.
    People immigrating, paying taxes & working isn’t genocide & forced conversion ala Natives.

    Self-referencing as European is a Ukrainian or Balkanoid thing.
    Both places without much of a history outside Turkish harems.

    https://dharmicreality.wordpress.com/2022/05/15/mapping-the-western-right-from-a-varnashrama-lens/

    This “Nazi” faction mostly ignore caste differences and focus on the racial aspects (Shudras of whatever race, being at the lowest end of the caste ladder, prefer to ignore their lowly caste status within their race and focus on other aspects).

    You should show some class, and stfu. English Canada is mostly Scottish not Anglo.
    Hongcouver is a playful nickname, go back to worshipping Germans & their poo inspection toilets.

    • Replies: @AP
    @sher singh

    Where did you detect racialism in my post? I was pointing out the banal fact that Brits have been displaced by educated middle and upper class Chinese and Indians in Vancouver. There is a similar but much less extreme process in Toronto. Montreal remains the same, French seems to be a barrier. Some Algerians have settled but they don’t threaten the upper or middle class native positions and there don’t seem to be so many of them there.


    People immigrating, paying taxes & working isn’t genocide & forced conversion ala Natives
     
    Yes, it’s certainly a gentler way of losing one’s homeland and way of life. Though I suspect that in many ways Natives are better off now as modern Canadians then they had been had Europeans never come (living as tribesmen in premodernity, killing each other, etc.). I’m not sure if the same can necessarily be said of Englishmen in Canada. I hear Singapore is nice but was London worse in the 1950s?

    Replies: @sher singh

  249. sher singh says:
    @songbird
    @Thulean Friend

    They should have stuck to women of ill repute like Truss and cosmopolitan, r-selected, bastard-spawning mutts like BoJo. It's a mistake to put an obviously alien face on the regime, when so many willing passables would serve.

    Having an Indian PM will only increase the pressure to have a black one. They will need to mix it up - it wouldn't do to have a string of Indian ones , and color-signaling compels them.

    How long before a black PM starts using the word "racist", or before Sunak himself is caught using it? Or before they start lecturing about colonialism?

    Replies: @AnonfromTN, @sher singh, @Coconuts

    Only makes sense after Ireland & Portugal. Blacks & Indians occupy v dif place in Britain tbh,
    Rooftop Koreans didn’t lead to a karen meltdown..

    At the unveiling, Freud, an octogenarian by this point, with advancing Alzheimer’s, kept forgetting what was going on.

    “Who are these people?” he asked Pragnell. Around the table, everyone was pretending to talk while in fact listening to what he was saying.

    “They’re officers of the household cavalry,” Pragnell replied.

    “So why is there a negro here?” Freud asked.

    You could hear a pin drop. All at once, the whole awkwardness of the regiment’s diversity experiment was dragged into the open; the fundamental weirdness of “we’ve got two women and two black guys but we’re still posh” was exposed.

    https://unherd.com/2022/10/the-british-army-has-a-class-problem/

    He’d probably tell war stories of fighting beside Sikhs, OTOH.

  250. @AP
    @Dmitry


    Poor countries “demanding money” from rich countries, is apparently something which you see as positive about the poor countries
     
    It depends on the nature and context of the demands.

    If Germany chooses to give away hundreds of $ millions to non-European “refugees” it is good of a European people to divert some of the Germans’ money, that otherwise would be spent on their anti-European population replacement project, towards other Europeans for a change.


    So, better (not in moral sense) to be beggar, than the person who gives to the beggar

     

    It’s not being a beggar when the money is compensation. If you smash my car and I demand that you pay for the damages I am not being a “beggar.”

    There is no significant emigration of Western Europeans to live in Poland, but there are millions of Poles emigrating to Western Europe. But this is because the life is better on average significantly in Western Europe
     
    No, it’s not because life is necessarily better but because more money can be made and some people sacrifice years of their lives in order to provide better material circumstances for their families. Poland is a very nice and pleasant place but incomes are a lot higher in the West so some people move there.

    It’s increasing the internationalization or multinationalism of Canada, whether you view as good or bad. If it becomes like Singapore in the utopian example, or like Balkans/Lebanon in the dystopian.

     

    It depends on who emigrates. It will be like Singapore if it’s a massive wave of Chinese and South Asians. Parts that have been flooded already, have earned the nickname Hongcouver. In this city the middle and upper classes are mostly well dressed Chinese from Hong Kong, with some Whites and upper caste Indians and Sikhs mixed in. There is a large mass of mostly White, and a few Native, heroin junkies. The district with junkies has much more pre-Asian people (of native European and native Indian descent) than the nicer parts of the city. Once upon a time the British Europeans displaced the native Indians and now the cycle continues and the Chinese and Asian Indians have displaced the British Europeans, who have joined the native Indians in the impoverished margins.*

    There aren’t enough Balkan and Lebanese immigrants to make Canada another Lebanon or Balkans.

    Mass Ukrainian immigration wouldn’t save Canada’s British heritage (the Anglo Canadians have chosen to destroy it themselves, as Anglos do), but would at least keep the place more European.

    *At least, this is the impression I got from spending a few days in downtown Vancouver, a beautiful and wealthy Chinese city, made of green and blue glass, whose Chinese residents are mostly like civilized Chinese from Hong Kong or Singapore rather than Sovok-like mainlanders, where European people and Native Indians dress in rags, use drugs and beg for money. I think there are normal Europeans living out in many of the suburbs to which they have retreated.

    Replies: @Dmitry, @sher singh, @silviosilver

    Once upon a time the British Europeans displaced the native Indians and now the cycle continues and the Chinese and Asian Indians have displaced the British Europeans,

    Lol, as I never tire of pointing out, the racial bullshit never ceases with this mendacious worm.

    The “cycle continues”, you see. It’s just a natural part of the rhythm of life. Has nothing to do with, you know, deliberate fucking policy.

    I must say it’s interesting the way AP gets off on taunting the very people he is most relying on to aid his precious Ukraine. The extreme butthurt he feels – let’s face it, it’s gotta hurt for a prideful Uke to think his country could soon be outclassed by even the lowly pajeets of hindoostan – makes him say very weird and very spiteful things.

    • Agree: sher singh, S
    • Replies: @sher singh
    @silviosilver

    Worse that it's a family man in his 50s. Some weird stuff going on with Catholic Slavs.
    Literally every single one is a butthurt faggot with wild takes detached from reality.

    Add in the Balts & they're really competing with Protestants & Sunnis for gayest religion.


    Much less obviously, whites are too superior for their own good. Whites are better than blacks at virtually everything that truly matters in life
     
    So is everyone else - they're a separate species. Them being part of humanity is a Christian lie.

    (This is why I equate doctrinaire egalitarianism with brain disease; it’s like a slow-drip poison that progressively (huh) destroys you. A basic egalitarian sense is okay, as long as you don’t lose sight of reality. People should be treated as equally as possible, but not more so. Doctrinaire egalitarianism dispenses completely with reality.)
     
    Why? This is why you're gay. Equality is letting your women whore around,
    till the point you lose all sense of tribes and end up a 'race'

    https://hbdchick.wordpress.com/2011/04/04/whatever-happened-to-european-tribes/


    “The medieval church instituted marriage laws and practices that undermined large kinship groups. From as early as the fourth century, it discouraged practices that enlarged the family, such as adoption, polygamy, concubinage, divorce, and remarriage. It severely prohibited marriages among individuals of the same blood (consanguineous marriages), which had constituted a means to create and maintain kinship groups throughout history.
     

    Christianity has a lot of value – value as a ‘spiritual tradition,’ if you will. But taking its truth claims seriously – at least outside the Christian core of faith in a salvific redeemer figure
     
    Render unto Caeser or Don't rebel it's 'fitnah' are both examples of lit social control.
    The atheists are right about monothiesm it's a priest trying to exercise Prima Nocta.

    Among the anthropologically defined 356 contemporary societies of Euro-Asia and Africa, there is a large and significant negative correlation between Christianization (for at least 500 years) and the absence of clans and lineages;
     

    The welfare of the social order, according to St. Augustine (City of God XV.16) and St. Thomas (Suppl. Q. liii, a. 3), demanded the widest possible extension of friendship and love among all humankind, to which desirable aim the intermarriage of close blood-relations was opposed; this was especially true in the first half of the Middle Ages, when the best interests of society required the unification of the numerous tribes and peoples which had settled on the soil of the Roman Empire. By overthrowing the barriers between inimical families and races, ruinous internecine warfare was diminished and greater peace and harmony secured among the newly-converted Christians.
     
    Pagan Rome could survive centuries of mass immigration with its genome intact.
    Christianity's value as a spiritual tradition is the destruction of whiteness in under a century.

    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ

    Replies: @silviosilver

    , @AP
    @silviosilver


    The “cycle continues”, you see. It’s just a natural part of the rhythm of life. Has nothing to do with, you know, deliberate fucking policy.
     
    Where did I claim that it wasn’t the result of policies? Native Indians also deliberately pursued policies that facilitated their displacement - trading for guns with which to kill rival tribes, feeding the alien newcomers, etc.

    I must say it’s interesting the way AP gets off on taunting
     
    Matra habitually whines about Slavic immigration into British places like Canada (or indeed Britain itself). I’m just pointing out that the main impact will be to dilute the impact of the deliberate flooding of British territories by non-Europeans that for some reason British pursue as policy wherever they have settled.

    The extreme butthurt he feels

     

    There’s that nasty projection of yours again. Singh noticed it too. I’m good.

    Replies: @silviosilver

    , @LatW
    @silviosilver


    I must say it’s interesting the way AP gets off on taunting the very people he is most relying on to aid his precious Ukraine. The extreme butthurt he feels – let’s face it, it’s gotta hurt for a prideful Uke to think his country could soon be outclassed by even the lowly pajeets of hindoostan – makes him say very weird and very spiteful things.
     
    That's not really how a typical Ukrainian (from Ukraine) thinks, though, it's an attitude more in line with middle class or upper middle class SWPLs in the West (I've heard it from them before, too, using almost exactly the same language, "it's a cycle", "it's how history goes", I was dumbfounded, tbh, and when I first heard it what shocked me the most was the ease of the acceptance of these facts on the ground, not to mention I felt deeply offended, this was a rich Scots Irish boomer woman who said this, completely oblivious to her children's and grandchildren's future). It's not how a typical Ukrainian who had been raised in Ukraine would think. Not at all. First, this is not even on their radar right now. Second, if they did think about the replacement, even some of the normies (not to even mention the nationalists) would feel a bit taken aback if they saw what's really going on. They will definitely care if it starts happening in UA. The only question is if they'll have the resources to withstand it.

    It is kind of true though that first they displaced the Natives. It's just that does it really mean that the new settlers would have to be displaced, too? It's an ideological question.

    Replies: @Coconuts, @S

    , @Wokechoke
    @silviosilver

    Any English cheering on Ukies under Zelenskyy at this point are just suckers. The actual battle is in London, Bradford, Birmingham etc. Who cares if Alex/Oleg or Olex/Oleh run Kiev/Keev when the mayor is called Khan and the PM is Sunak.

    Replies: @sudden death

  251. @LatW
    @Yevardian


    resentfully holding on to past grievances out of misplaced pride does nothing for a country.
     
    You either misunderstood me or you're deliberately looking past my point - I wasn't talking about some mysterious "past grievances" but about the killing that is ongoing. The attacks on the civilian infrastructure that are happening right now, as we speak, many Ukrainians have no electricity.

    But the opportunity should have been taken for concessions while the country held a position of relative strength. The intransigence and tedious focus on the genocide got worse with later presidents.
     
    Of course, it is always better to have fewer tensions. But do you think Armenia's position would significantly change just by making those concessions? You do not believe there may be deeper problems under the surface? Or are you thinking that you would just live on hating each other but not encounter a crisis and that would be livable.

    If Ukraine’s leaders were smart, they’d be realistic enough about letting go of Crimea and Donbass, so they can end this war soon, on terms not totally dictated by foreign powers, allowing for eventual reproachment with Russia.
     
    Rapprochement is very difficult to talk about right now, as there are constant attacks being carried out on Ukraine and they will not stop until there is a serious break in the war. The attacks may not even stop if the Russians are pushed out of Kherson, there could be attacks from Belarus (there are Iranian drone specialists in Belarus right now so there could be a drone attack on Western Ukraine). Rapprochement may not happen for a very long time.

    It's too early to talk about Donbas and Crimea. The issue with giving up territory is that, while you do get a frozen conflict, which is better than more deaths, eventually the next generation will be forced to fight again. The Ukrainians do not want to leave this war to their children.

    It might not be ‘fair’ but throwing out atrocity claims (true or not), endlessly harping on them, demanding their retribution just doesn’t make any sense unless you realistically expect your enemy’s unconditional surrender and total capitulation.
     
    In this kind of a thing, you should speak for yourself, because victims deserve justice. It's easy to speak that way about other people's children. If your people were victims, you would be ok to say - let us not seek justice. But do not speak that way about others. The Ukrainians will start with prosecuting those who they can, for crimes that they have already investigated.

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon

    ” victims deserve justice. It’s easy to speak that way about other people’s children. If your people were victims, you would be ok to say – let us not seek justice. But do not speak that way about others. ”

    Lots of peoples have been victims of war crimes and have not sought justice. The children of Germany and Japan for starters.

    On a a less sombre but still pretty important note, I can’t believe Germany is so passive, as their “allies” sever their energy arteries then stop them investigating the crime – a crime which could justify retribution.

    • LOL: Mikhail
    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @YetAnotherAnon

    https://mediacloud.theweek.com/image/upload/f_auto,t_content-image-desktop@1/v1646756029/260735_768_rgb.jpg

    , @Matra
    @YetAnotherAnon


    On a a less sombre but still pretty important note, I can’t believe Germany is so passive, as their “allies” sever their energy arteries then stop them investigating the crime – a crime which could justify retribution.
     
    Looking at some of their media a few days ago the Germans seem more interested in laughing at Britain's leadership foibles and warning about the dangers of fascism from Italy's new government. When Trump was in office Der Spiegel in particular delighted in mocking the US, just as they did under Dubya, with their main cartoonist becoming a minor celeb - speaking truth to power & all that - yet now that they are facing outright aggression from the US they are meek little lambs.

    Meanwhile in Poland they are the opposite. Poles angrier about a suspected stolen book than Germans about pipeline sabotage?

    From Aga Tumiłowicz-Mazur's Twitter feed:

    Czytelnia Akademicka in L'viv was a Polish student scientific society active between 1867 and the beginning of WWII. Speculations ensued whether the book was stolen (and if yes, by whom? Germans? Russians?) and therefore should be returned. Some Poles are really, really upset.

    So upset in fact that they call it"fencing in broad daylight" & "slap in the face",tagging on Twitter both the 🇵🇱Ministry of Culture and the Spokesman of the M.of Foreign Affairs,the latter of which responded with "we are aware" of the case that is heating up the 🇵🇱internet.
     

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard

    , @LatW
    @YetAnotherAnon


    Lots of peoples have been victims of war crimes and have not sought justice
     
    Unfortunately, they weren't able to. It remains to be seen if the Ukrainians will be able to.

    I can’t believe Germany is so passive, as their “allies” sever their energy arteries then stop them investigating the crime – a crime which could justify retribution.
     
    Don't know if it's a "crime" (although certainly will put a strain on the elderly and other vulnerable groups, not to mention potential layoffs if they will happen), it's just generally a super unfortunate situation. It's the last thing we needed, but it's not that we didn't see it coming. Covid was a weakening factor, so it's not surprising that a war (or some kind of reshuffling of power) would follow after something like that.

    What is interesting, though, is how willingly Germany has stepped up to the leadership role in the future reconstruction program. Of course, the funds will be coming from various sources, but I thought the "allies&friends" would have to implore Germany much longer and harder, but Germany seems to have assumed that leadership position rather willingly.

    It might be that they're seeing long term opportunities there. And of course you can't have ruins forever on your doorstep.

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon

  252. “Chemicals group BASF has announced that the company will have to “permanently” downsize in Europe, with high energy costs making the region increasingly uncompetitive.

    The announcement by the world’s largest chemical group by revenue came after it opened the first part of its new €10bn plastics plant in China a month ago, which it says will support growing demand in the country.

    “The European chemicals market has been growing only weakly for about a decade [and] significant increases in natural gas and electricity prices during this year are putting pressure on
    value chains,” said Chief Executive Martin Brudermüller.”

  253. Adhering to NATO/US policy is killing German industry. When your costs go up by 2.2 bn, and you can only save 500m by cutting back on R&D.

    In the first nine months of 2022, the additional cost of natural gas at BASF’s European sites would have been around €2.2 billion ($2.2 billion) compared to the same period in 2021, he said.

    A large number of planned EU regulations represented an additional burden, he added.

    “These challenging framework conditions in Europe are endangering the international competitiveness of European producers,” Brudermüller said.

    BASF’s management recently launched a drastic savings programme to be implemented in 2023 and 2024. The cuts are intended to reduce annual non-production costs by €500 million.

    The board wants to implement more than half of the savings at the Ludwigshafen site, where BASF employs about 39,000 of its approximately 111,000 employees worldwide.

    Corporate, service and research divisions as well as the group headquarters are to be streamlined, it said. The company is not ruling out job cuts.”

    https://www.msn.com/en-xl/news/other/ceo-of-german-chemical-company-basf-justifies-austerity-programme/ar-AA13o1zC

  254. sher singh says:
    @silviosilver
    @AP


    Once upon a time the British Europeans displaced the native Indians and now the cycle continues and the Chinese and Asian Indians have displaced the British Europeans,
     
    Lol, as I never tire of pointing out, the racial bullshit never ceases with this mendacious worm.

    The "cycle continues", you see. It's just a natural part of the rhythm of life. Has nothing to do with, you know, deliberate fucking policy.

    I must say it's interesting the way AP gets off on taunting the very people he is most relying on to aid his precious Ukraine. The extreme butthurt he feels - let's face it, it's gotta hurt for a prideful Uke to think his country could soon be outclassed by even the lowly pajeets of hindoostan - makes him say very weird and very spiteful things.

    Replies: @sher singh, @AP, @LatW, @Wokechoke

    Worse that it’s a family man in his 50s. Some weird stuff going on with Catholic Slavs.
    Literally every single one is a butthurt faggot with wild takes detached from reality.

    Add in the Balts & they’re really competing with Protestants & Sunnis for gayest religion.

    Much less obviously, whites are too superior for their own good. Whites are better than blacks at virtually everything that truly matters in life

    So is everyone else – they’re a separate species. Them being part of humanity is a Christian lie.

    (This is why I equate doctrinaire egalitarianism with brain disease; it’s like a slow-drip poison that progressively (huh) destroys you. A basic egalitarian sense is okay, as long as you don’t lose sight of reality. People should be treated as equally as possible, but not more so. Doctrinaire egalitarianism dispenses completely with reality.)

    Why? This is why you’re gay. Equality is letting your women whore around,
    till the point you lose all sense of tribes and end up a ‘race’

    https://hbdchick.wordpress.com/2011/04/04/whatever-happened-to-european-tribes/

    “The medieval church instituted marriage laws and practices that undermined large kinship groups. From as early as the fourth century, it discouraged practices that enlarged the family, such as adoption, polygamy, concubinage, divorce, and remarriage. It severely prohibited marriages among individuals of the same blood (consanguineous marriages), which had constituted a means to create and maintain kinship groups throughout history.

    Christianity has a lot of value – value as a ‘spiritual tradition,’ if you will. But taking its truth claims seriously – at least outside the Christian core of faith in a salvific redeemer figure

    Render unto Caeser or Don’t rebel it’s ‘fitnah’ are both examples of lit social control.
    The atheists are right about monothiesm it’s a priest trying to exercise Prima Nocta.

    Among the anthropologically defined 356 contemporary societies of Euro-Asia and Africa, there is a large and significant negative correlation between Christianization (for at least 500 years) and the absence of clans and lineages;

    The welfare of the social order, according to St. Augustine (City of God XV.16) and St. Thomas (Suppl. Q. liii, a. 3), demanded the widest possible extension of friendship and love among all humankind, to which desirable aim the intermarriage of close blood-relations was opposed; this was especially true in the first half of the Middle Ages, when the best interests of society required the unification of the numerous tribes and peoples which had settled on the soil of the Roman Empire. By overthrowing the barriers between inimical families and races, ruinous internecine warfare was diminished and greater peace and harmony secured among the newly-converted Christians.

    Pagan Rome could survive centuries of mass immigration with its genome intact.
    Christianity’s value as a spiritual tradition is the destruction of whiteness in under a century.

    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ

    • Replies: @silviosilver
    @sher singh


    Why? This is why you’re gay. Equality is letting your women whore around,
    till the point you lose all sense of tribes and end up a ‘race’
     
    Because it makes for a more pleasant society, that's why. A society can essentially choose to emphasize the ways in which people are equal or the ways in which they're unequal. There's no need for the latter, since pretty much everyone already has a 'gut sense' of who's better and who's not in any given context (including a 'general' life context), so emphasizing equality helps people feel more at ease around each other and generally treat each more kindly (although probably less respectfully, but that may be a price worth paying). The basic rule for unequal interactions is: you pretend the differences between us are unimportant, and I'll pretend you haven't noticed them. That's not so hard to do.

    till the point you lose all sense of tribes and end up a ‘race’
     
    Well that's great then. Just as 'nation' is better than tribe, 'race' is better than nation. You have to remember, I am a liberal at heart. A liberal society composed of 'ballpark' standard racial homogeneity? I'll take that over 'nation' or 'ethnicity' or 'religion' or 'tribe' any day.

    The medieval church instituted marriage laws and practices that undermined large kinship groups.
     
    Nice to know Christianity was useful for something besides constituting today's European spiritual tradition.

    So is everyone else – they’re a separate species.
     
    Thanks for quoting me out of context so that I sound like a 'supremacist.' Now, to be sure, I am defiantly a 'racist,' but I drawn the line at supremacy, so I must protest my innocence.

    Nobody hates Punjabis or thinks they’re pajeets.
     
    How would you know? It's your own back people are talking behind.

    Stay butthurt balkanoid faggot,
     
    What am I butthurt about? I freely admit my peep's lack of 'greatness' and I've never proposed that any person's or group's sense of self-worth should be based on it. That obsession is something you and AP seem caught up in.

    Replies: @sher singh

  255. @silviosilver
    @Thulean Friend


    demographically infiltrating elite circles in key Western countries instead of trying to build up national strength á la China. Perhaps the smarter long-term strategy.
     
    Lol, talk about making a virtue out of necessity.

    Of course, given the choice, they'd happily take the national strength that China has achieved; it's simply that, being less competent, they haven't (and perhaps - certainly it is to be hoped - they never will).

    And also of course, it is white stupidity and apathy that has enabled the infiltration, rather than the ingenuity of hindoo wiles. Even wokesters are more likely to characterize interactions with pajeets as "repellant" than "charming."

    And also also of course, none but a pajeet would celebrate any of this. It's interesting how subdued the "first Indian PM!" reaction has been. If it were the "first black PM!" Britcucks would be fainting from the ecstasy.

    Replies: @sher singh, @Wokechoke

    Nobody hates Punjabis or thinks they’re pajeets.
    Stay butthurt balkanoid faggot,

    When it comes down to everything being counted,
    All you did was christianize europe & impart whites genes on the Turks.

    Lit harem of monotheism.

    • LOL: Yevardian
  256. @Sher Singh
    @Barbarossa

    https://twitter.com/CotswoldArch/status/1463417886400258053?s=20

    We'll kill to protect the cow.
    You won't kill to practice cow slaughter.

    The result's already decided, Guru's Hukam is final.

    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ

    Replies: @Barbarossa

    In all honesty, the prospect of a bunch of Sikhs taking over and keeping me from eating beef ranks about on par with Martian invasion on the list of things I’m realistically concerned about. I’ll be happy to raise the threat assessment once you guys have solidified control of the Indian subcontinent.

    • Agree: Mr. Hack
    • Replies: @sher singh
    @Barbarossa

    Um, who said a bunch of Sikhs would do it? I have no disagreement with Liberals or WEF on the issue

    Replies: @Barbarossa, @Barbarossa

    , @Mikel
    @Barbarossa


    the prospect of a bunch of Sikhs taking over and keeping me from eating beef ranks about on par with Martian invasion on the list of things I’m realistically concerned about.
     
    If the Martians are peaceful I think I'd rate the beef abolitionists as a bigger threat to human well-being.

    To my knowledge, Sher Singh has never explained what's wrong with eating beef anyway. He should just try a properly aged rib-steak and he'd forget all those archaic myths.

    Replies: @Sher Singh, @sudden death, @Barbarossa

    , @Thulean Friend
    @Barbarossa


    I’ll be happy to raise the threat assessment once you guys have solidified control of the Indian subcontinent.
     
    The way things are going, I'd bet on Canada first. From their latest census:

    https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/221026/cg221026b002-eng.png

    Sikhs comprised 1.7% of India's population in the last Indian census (2011). The numbers for the newest Indian census aren't out but the percentage has either stagnated or perhaps even dropped due to massive emigration.

    So Canada now has more Sikhs as a percentage of its population than India. Statistics Canada has more details:


    The diversity of the South Asian group can also be observed in the broad range of mother tongues reported in the 2021 Census, with English (36.4%), Punjabi (29.4%), Urdu (11.3%), Hindi (8.2%), Tamil (7.1%) and Gujarati (6.4%) the most commonly reported, alone or with other languages.

    Finally, the top three religions reported by South Asians are Hinduism (29.9%), Sikhism (29.6%) and Islam (23.1%).
     

    Sikhs comprise nearly 1/3rd of all South Asians in Canada but are less than 1% in South Asia itself. I was barely half-joking when I wrote that the only "martial spirit" left in the Sikh community is devoted towards getting a Canadian visa.

    ---

    Meanwhile, Sikhs and Hindus are getting into street confrontations in Canada:

    https://www.reddit.com/r/Brampton/comments/yd1ifa/at_least_its_not_a_sword_fight_s/

    Once again proves three arguments I've been making here:

    1) thinking Islam is the problem is short-sighted, as non-Islamic groups can be - and often are - very tribal.

    2) behaviour is more tied to cultural values than religion per se

    3) a "white vs all" future is very unlikely. Kanye's recent comments is further proof, not to mention the LA council scandal where Latinx where shitting on blacks, jews, armenians and god knows who else. The rising Hindu vs Sikh tension is just the latest manifestation of that. In Södertälje, the recent influx of moslems from the 2015 wave has increased tensions between the Christian Assyrian community and the newcomers.

    And I might as well add Matra's fourth rule:

    4) diaspora nationalism is only going to rise in the West as once you reach a sufficiently critical base, it will be easier to retain your identity and resist assimilation. Though I actually think this is a better outcome than everyone trying to "be white" and invariably failing in some hilarious way, since I want genuine multiculturalism.

    Replies: @sher singh

  257. @YetAnotherAnon
    @LatW


    " victims deserve justice. It’s easy to speak that way about other people’s children. If your people were victims, you would be ok to say – let us not seek justice. But do not speak that way about others. "
     
    Lots of peoples have been victims of war crimes and have not sought justice. The children of Germany and Japan for starters.

    https://i.postimg.cc/9MLdCRDT/Bundesarchiv-Bild-146-1979-025-19-A-Koeln-Kinderleichen-nach-Luftangriff.jpg


    On a a less sombre but still pretty important note, I can't believe Germany is so passive, as their "allies" sever their energy arteries then stop them investigating the crime - a crime which could justify retribution.

    https://cdn.locals.com/images/posts/originals/1987197/1987197_wl6tkn5myax6kup.jpeg

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @Matra, @LatW

  258. @silviosilver
    @AP


    Once upon a time the British Europeans displaced the native Indians and now the cycle continues and the Chinese and Asian Indians have displaced the British Europeans,
     
    Lol, as I never tire of pointing out, the racial bullshit never ceases with this mendacious worm.

    The "cycle continues", you see. It's just a natural part of the rhythm of life. Has nothing to do with, you know, deliberate fucking policy.

    I must say it's interesting the way AP gets off on taunting the very people he is most relying on to aid his precious Ukraine. The extreme butthurt he feels - let's face it, it's gotta hurt for a prideful Uke to think his country could soon be outclassed by even the lowly pajeets of hindoostan - makes him say very weird and very spiteful things.

    Replies: @sher singh, @AP, @LatW, @Wokechoke

    The “cycle continues”, you see. It’s just a natural part of the rhythm of life. Has nothing to do with, you know, deliberate fucking policy.

    Where did I claim that it wasn’t the result of policies? Native Indians also deliberately pursued policies that facilitated their displacement – trading for guns with which to kill rival tribes, feeding the alien newcomers, etc.

    I must say it’s interesting the way AP gets off on taunting

    Matra habitually whines about Slavic immigration into British places like Canada (or indeed Britain itself). I’m just pointing out that the main impact will be to dilute the impact of the deliberate flooding of British territories by non-Europeans that for some reason British pursue as policy wherever they have settled.

    The extreme butthurt he feels

    There’s that nasty projection of yours again. Singh noticed it too. I’m good.

    • Thanks: sher singh
    • Replies: @silviosilver
    @AP


    Matra habitually whines about Slavic immigration into British places like Canada (or indeed Britain itself).
     
    And rightly so, since in hindsight (in foresight, too, for that matter), it's proven much more of a curse than a blessing to his people. To be clear, I'm talking about the arrival of my own predecessors too here (perhaps not "slavic" in your eyes, but part of the same general wave) - every bit as much a curse as yours, perhaps even more so.

    If southern and eastern Europeans were the only (or at least overwhelming) beneficiaries of immigrationist largess - as was once the case - I'd probably lie through my teeth about its wonders just as you do. But we're not, so I'll happily side with anyone who wants to end this madness (rather than perpetuate it, like you do), even if in the course of ending it dirty, hidden truths are aired.

    Replies: @sher singh, @AP

  259. @S
    @songbird


    Recently, I wondered what the first scifi story was that predicted machines that did all the tasks, and caused men to become listless, or even to devolve.
     
    That's a good question. I wouldn't know. I imagen they go back quite aways.

    I read a memorable one a week or two ago from Project Gutenburg that had a alien race that became brainless caged slugs attended by their super-advanced machines.
     
    Sounds a little bit like now with so many folks unhealthy attachment to 'social media'. Also sounds a like the 1909 short story The Machine Stops

    The story, set in a world where humanity lives underground and relies on a giant machine to provide its needs, predicted technologies similar to instant messaging and the Internet.

    The story describes a world in which most of the human population has lost the ability to live on the surface of the Earth. Each individual now lives in isolation below ground in a standard room, with all bodily and spiritual needs met by the omnipotent, global Machine. Travel is permitted, but is unpopular and rarely necessary. Communication is made via a kind of instant messaging/video conferencing machine with which people conduct their only activity: the sharing of ideas and what passes for knowledge.
     
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Machine_Stops

    Replies: @Barbarossa

    Also sounds a like the 1909 short story The Machine Stops

    That was the one I was going to throw out there. I really like that story for it’s very prescient view of where we seem to be headed; not in the technological particulars necessarily but certainly in spirit.

    • Agree: S
  260. @Dmitry
    @AP


    Vancouver.. Sovok

     

    Although much of the property wealth in Vancouver will not be so far from the Chinese Communist Party and a lot closer to it, than the ordinary Chinese people living in China. They are often children of the political elite in China, as the wealth in China and the connection to the communist party are not so uncorrelated. I posted the link a bit for repetitive, but to apologize for the repetition, remember the great report on YouTube about the movement of wealth from China to Vancouver https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IZs2i3Bpx.

    would at least keep the place more European.
     
    It depends what kind of "European". Ukraine is between Sierra Leone and Zambia in the corruption perceptions index.

    Obviously, Canada filters immigrants, so there will be reduction of such cultural transfer by immigrants, but for EU, which introduces the open border system. EU citizens would have open borders, without filtration, from this zone of geographical Europe which is exactly not culturally the brand image of "enlightened Europe".


    life is necessarily better but because more money can be made
     
    Life generally is really better, which is not to say life in Poland is below average in the world concept. In Western Europe you can be unemployed and you still have a comfortable life, with money to relax in a cafe every day. There not many places for immigrants, than Western Europe, that can be so comfortable, wealthy, luxury and easy. There is a reason a significant part of the world is trying to live there.

    Germans’ money, that otherwise would be spent on their anti-European population
     
    It's not like Poland is the least "anti-German" population for German taxpayers to give money to fund. You know the most rapid way to make a stereotypically culture habituated Polish people angry with them. Say "Poles are similar to Russians". And the second most rapid way? "Poles are similar to Germans".

    It’s not being a beggar when the money is compensation. If you smash my car and I demand that you pay for the damages I am not being a “beggar.”

     

    This could be argued if the money was only from Germany, but the convergence funding is from UK, France, Denmark, Netherlands, Belgium, Sweden. For many years, the taxpayers of all the wealthy EU countries, have been used for the convergence funding, which Poland is the greatest receiver.


    https://i.imgur.com/uoGkp44.jpg

    It's not Netherlands or United Kingdom, are responsible for the crimes of Hitler. They lost large part of London fighting against Hitler, which began as the response for Germany's invasion of Poland, while Hitler had always wanted and expected peace with the Kingdom.

    Replies: @Dmitry, @AP

    Although much of the property wealth in Vancouver will not be so far from the Chinese Communist Party and a lot closer to it, than the ordinary Chinese people living in China

    Maybe so, but most of the settlers have been Hong King Chinese fleeing CCP rule and not Chinese mainlanders. These crossed the ocean with suitcases filled with cash and drove up property prices. But I’m sure that we’ll connected relatives of Chinese Communist Party officials are involved in high level speculation also.

    would at least keep the place more European.

    It depends what kind of “European”. Ukraine is between Sierra Leone and Zambia in the corruption perceptions index

    I think you would not confuse Lviv or Vynnytsia with Zambia or Sierra Leone 🙂

    life is necessarily better but because more money can be made

    Life generally is really better, which is not to say life in Poland

    Life is not generally worse in Krakow than in any German city, the latter’s only real advantage is higher income and related to that better and more retail stores. This is why many Poles go to Germany to work, but send the money back to Poland where they eventually return, because Poland is a better place to be ultimately. It is architecturally no worse, arts and culture great, food and restaurants are no worse, public transportation and roads are fine, but culture is more conservative and the place isn’t flooded by non-Europeans.

    In Western Europe you can be unemployed and you still have a comfortable life, with money to relax in a cafe every day

    This is true, but most Poles do not aspire to be unemployed.

    For many years, the taxpayers of all the wealthy EU countries, have been used for the convergence funding, which Poland is the greatest receiver

    From the chart you posted, it looks like per capita Poland is far from being the biggest receiver. A lot of that money goes to back to the western EU countries in the form of Poland consuming western EU goods?

    And again, Western Europe is so generous when it comes to giving money to non-European settlers in Western Europe. There is nothing shameful about eastern Europeans diverting some money to other Europeans, instead.

    If I were a German I would rather spend money upgrading a bus system in some Polish city than building houses for Syrian settlers in my city.

    • Replies: @Dmitry
    @AP


    most of the settlers have been Hong
     
    The report says wealthy immigrants in Vancouver are mainland Chinese, connected to the political elite (Chinese Communist Party).

    They discuss the poor Chinese who had been the population in Vancouver before the 2000s, which have not much connection to the new wealthy immigrants. https://youtu.be/IZs2i3Bpxx4?t=360.

    This is like wealthy Chinese in Europe. Children of China's political elite are always moving hundreds of billions of dollars to the West, which reminds of the last twenty years Russia. In Russia, the main purpose of ruling class of the last decades has been moving to the West, this is the reason to be ruling class, but China's ruling class also has a few of these aspects.


    connected relatives of Chinese Communist Party officials are involved in high level speculation also.

     

    It's not speculation, they will be quietly moving money to the West, in order to move the money (not to increase the money).

    Wealthy people in Russia are living by moving money to the West this century. The main purpose has not been to multiply the money in the West, it is to move it into the West.


    you would not confuse Lviv or Vynnytsia with Zambia or Sierra Leone

     

    Creating an open borders system with Ukraine, is not a light medicine for the wealthy countries. Perceptions of corruption can be equal, but likely Ukraine will have a more powerful mafia than Zambia or Sierra Leone and Ukraine's costs for the EU could potentially be vast - you only need to see how much money Poland has pulled from Europe.

    latter’s only real advantage is higher income and related to that better
     
    Better income, more work/life balance, better services, better education, better environment (Poland has the most polluted air in Europe), better healthcare, etc. I.e. objective indicators.

    per capita Poland is far from being the biggest receiver.

     

    Poland is the greatest receiver of EU money in the net terms, which is the relevant one as we are talking about the country.

    Western Europe. There is nothing shameful about eastern Europeans diverting some money to other Europeans
     
    The taxpayers who are paying for Eastern Europe are not Eastern Europeans, they are the Western Europeans from the net positive countries.

    If I were a German I would rather spend money upgrading a bus system in some Polish city
     
    I would prefer spend the money upgrading a bus system in a German city.

    building houses for Syrian settlers in my city.
     
    You can be so critical of Syrians, but it's not like the postsoviet space is recently appearing more in the civilized world and European values. If I remember Syrians were only cutting off heads, not boiling them.

    Replies: @AP

  261. @sher singh
    @silviosilver

    Worse that it's a family man in his 50s. Some weird stuff going on with Catholic Slavs.
    Literally every single one is a butthurt faggot with wild takes detached from reality.

    Add in the Balts & they're really competing with Protestants & Sunnis for gayest religion.


    Much less obviously, whites are too superior for their own good. Whites are better than blacks at virtually everything that truly matters in life
     
    So is everyone else - they're a separate species. Them being part of humanity is a Christian lie.

    (This is why I equate doctrinaire egalitarianism with brain disease; it’s like a slow-drip poison that progressively (huh) destroys you. A basic egalitarian sense is okay, as long as you don’t lose sight of reality. People should be treated as equally as possible, but not more so. Doctrinaire egalitarianism dispenses completely with reality.)
     
    Why? This is why you're gay. Equality is letting your women whore around,
    till the point you lose all sense of tribes and end up a 'race'

    https://hbdchick.wordpress.com/2011/04/04/whatever-happened-to-european-tribes/


    “The medieval church instituted marriage laws and practices that undermined large kinship groups. From as early as the fourth century, it discouraged practices that enlarged the family, such as adoption, polygamy, concubinage, divorce, and remarriage. It severely prohibited marriages among individuals of the same blood (consanguineous marriages), which had constituted a means to create and maintain kinship groups throughout history.
     

    Christianity has a lot of value – value as a ‘spiritual tradition,’ if you will. But taking its truth claims seriously – at least outside the Christian core of faith in a salvific redeemer figure
     
    Render unto Caeser or Don't rebel it's 'fitnah' are both examples of lit social control.
    The atheists are right about monothiesm it's a priest trying to exercise Prima Nocta.

    Among the anthropologically defined 356 contemporary societies of Euro-Asia and Africa, there is a large and significant negative correlation between Christianization (for at least 500 years) and the absence of clans and lineages;
     

    The welfare of the social order, according to St. Augustine (City of God XV.16) and St. Thomas (Suppl. Q. liii, a. 3), demanded the widest possible extension of friendship and love among all humankind, to which desirable aim the intermarriage of close blood-relations was opposed; this was especially true in the first half of the Middle Ages, when the best interests of society required the unification of the numerous tribes and peoples which had settled on the soil of the Roman Empire. By overthrowing the barriers between inimical families and races, ruinous internecine warfare was diminished and greater peace and harmony secured among the newly-converted Christians.
     
    Pagan Rome could survive centuries of mass immigration with its genome intact.
    Christianity's value as a spiritual tradition is the destruction of whiteness in under a century.

    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ

    Replies: @silviosilver

    Why? This is why you’re gay. Equality is letting your women whore around,
    till the point you lose all sense of tribes and end up a ‘race’

    Because it makes for a more pleasant society, that’s why. A society can essentially choose to emphasize the ways in which people are equal or the ways in which they’re unequal. There’s no need for the latter, since pretty much everyone already has a ‘gut sense’ of who’s better and who’s not in any given context (including a ‘general’ life context), so emphasizing equality helps people feel more at ease around each other and generally treat each more kindly (although probably less respectfully, but that may be a price worth paying). The basic rule for unequal interactions is: you pretend the differences between us are unimportant, and I’ll pretend you haven’t noticed them. That’s not so hard to do.

    till the point you lose all sense of tribes and end up a ‘race’

    Well that’s great then. Just as ‘nation’ is better than tribe, ‘race’ is better than nation. You have to remember, I am a liberal at heart. A liberal society composed of ‘ballpark’ standard racial homogeneity? I’ll take that over ‘nation’ or ‘ethnicity’ or ‘religion’ or ‘tribe’ any day.

    The medieval church instituted marriage laws and practices that undermined large kinship groups.

    Nice to know Christianity was useful for something besides constituting today’s European spiritual tradition.

    So is everyone else – they’re a separate species.

    Thanks for quoting me out of context so that I sound like a ‘supremacist.’ Now, to be sure, I am defiantly a ‘racist,’ but I drawn the line at supremacy, so I must protest my innocence.

    Nobody hates Punjabis or thinks they’re pajeets.

    How would you know? It’s your own back people are talking behind.

    Stay butthurt balkanoid faggot,

    What am I butthurt about? I freely admit my peep’s lack of ‘greatness’ and I’ve never proposed that any person’s or group’s sense of self-worth should be based on it. That obsession is something you and AP seem caught up in.

    • Replies: @sher singh
    @silviosilver


    Because it makes for a more pleasant society, The basic rule for unequal interactions is: you pretend the differences between us are unimportant, and I’ll pretend you haven’t noticed them. That’s not so hard to do.
     
    Dishonesty is unpleasant and destroys the soul. Brotherhood is always unequal,

    Well that’s great then. Just as ‘nation’ is better than tribe, ‘race’ is better than nation. You have to remember, I am a liberal at heart. A liberal society composed of ‘ballpark’ standard racial homogeneity? I’ll take that over ‘nation’ or ‘ethnicity’ or ‘religion’ or ‘tribe’ any day.
     
    Then a global Brazil is best.

    Thanks for quoting me out of context so that I sound like a ‘supremacist.
     
    ]

    90% of the genetic distance in Homo Sapiens is between Sub-Saharan & the rest.
    The only race is Negro or not - the rest are ethnicities.
    This makes our antagonisms, and differences more valuable.

    How would you know? It’s your own back people are talking behind.
     
    White women aren't really dishonest. A greasy Dago has every incentive to cause strife.
    I'm not caught up in any sense of greatness - the Maryada is correct, the Guru is great.

    I'm nothing.

    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ

    Replies: @silviosilver

  262. @YetAnotherAnon
    @LatW


    " victims deserve justice. It’s easy to speak that way about other people’s children. If your people were victims, you would be ok to say – let us not seek justice. But do not speak that way about others. "
     
    Lots of peoples have been victims of war crimes and have not sought justice. The children of Germany and Japan for starters.

    https://i.postimg.cc/9MLdCRDT/Bundesarchiv-Bild-146-1979-025-19-A-Koeln-Kinderleichen-nach-Luftangriff.jpg


    On a a less sombre but still pretty important note, I can't believe Germany is so passive, as their "allies" sever their energy arteries then stop them investigating the crime - a crime which could justify retribution.

    https://cdn.locals.com/images/posts/originals/1987197/1987197_wl6tkn5myax6kup.jpeg

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @Matra, @LatW

    On a a less sombre but still pretty important note, I can’t believe Germany is so passive, as their “allies” sever their energy arteries then stop them investigating the crime – a crime which could justify retribution.

    Looking at some of their media a few days ago the Germans seem more interested in laughing at Britain’s leadership foibles and warning about the dangers of fascism from Italy’s new government. When Trump was in office Der Spiegel in particular delighted in mocking the US, just as they did under Dubya, with their main cartoonist becoming a minor celeb – speaking truth to power & all that – yet now that they are facing outright aggression from the US they are meek little lambs.

    Meanwhile in Poland they are the opposite. Poles angrier about a suspected stolen book than Germans about pipeline sabotage?

    From Aga Tumiłowicz-Mazur’s Twitter feed:

    Czytelnia Akademicka in L’viv was a Polish student scientific society active between 1867 and the beginning of WWII. Speculations ensued whether the book was stolen (and if yes, by whom? Germans? Russians?) and therefore should be returned. Some Poles are really, really upset.

    So upset in fact that they call it”fencing in broad daylight” & “slap in the face”,tagging on Twitter both the 🇵🇱Ministry of Culture and the Spokesman of the M.of Foreign Affairs,the latter of which responded with “we are aware” of the case that is heating up the 🇵🇱internet.

    • Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Matra


    Looking at some of their media a few days ago the Germans seem more interested in laughing at Britain’s leadership foibles and warning about the dangers of fascism from Italy’s new government.
     
    The people on the top in Germany seem to have everything hedged and baked in. They must have an enormous amount of confidence in their security service. I don't know man. Racial fascism seems like something it would be ridiculously easy to encode. There has to be an extant new-age-pseudo-christianity that you could sell to forty million people who have lost all but the last shredded remnant of their patience and pride.
  263. @AP
    @silviosilver


    The “cycle continues”, you see. It’s just a natural part of the rhythm of life. Has nothing to do with, you know, deliberate fucking policy.
     
    Where did I claim that it wasn’t the result of policies? Native Indians also deliberately pursued policies that facilitated their displacement - trading for guns with which to kill rival tribes, feeding the alien newcomers, etc.

    I must say it’s interesting the way AP gets off on taunting
     
    Matra habitually whines about Slavic immigration into British places like Canada (or indeed Britain itself). I’m just pointing out that the main impact will be to dilute the impact of the deliberate flooding of British territories by non-Europeans that for some reason British pursue as policy wherever they have settled.

    The extreme butthurt he feels

     

    There’s that nasty projection of yours again. Singh noticed it too. I’m good.

    Replies: @silviosilver

    Matra habitually whines about Slavic immigration into British places like Canada (or indeed Britain itself).

    And rightly so, since in hindsight (in foresight, too, for that matter), it’s proven much more of a curse than a blessing to his people. To be clear, I’m talking about the arrival of my own predecessors too here (perhaps not “slavic” in your eyes, but part of the same general wave) – every bit as much a curse as yours, perhaps even more so.

    If southern and eastern Europeans were the only (or at least overwhelming) beneficiaries of immigrationist largess – as was once the case – I’d probably lie through my teeth about its wonders just as you do. But we’re not, so I’ll happily side with anyone who wants to end this madness (rather than perpetuate it, like you do), even if in the course of ending it dirty, hidden truths are aired.

    • Thanks: S
    • Replies: @sher singh
    @silviosilver

    Ukranians made Canada multicultural, and actively seek British areas.
    Every other group incl Meds, Slavs etc keep to themselves.

    Pan-Europeanism is a weasel term like Judeo-Christian - the Khazars were from Ukraine.
    6 Lakh Ukr Refugees isn't for a state than a bunch of educated S/E Asians.


    I’m just pointing out that the main impact will be to dilute the impact of the deliberate flooding of British territories by non-Europeans that for some reason British pursue as policy wherever they have settled.
     
    The Great Ukrainian saves the world from itself.
    If his woman makes a quick buck along the way all the better..
    The more the merrier.

    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ

    , @AP
    @silviosilver


    And rightly so, since in hindsight (in foresight, too, for that matter), it’s proven much more of a curse than a blessing to his people. To be clear, I’m talking about the arrival of my own predecessors too here (perhaps not “slavic” in your eyes, but part of the same general wave) – every bit as much a curse as yours, perhaps even more so
     
    Unlike most of the other Southern and Eastern European immigrants in Canada, Ukrainians were a settler nation who came to basically empty lands and turned them into highly productive farmland and Canada into one of the world’s main agricultural exporters. That settlement also prevented the Americans from claiming the empty territory (another reason the British/ Canadian authorities invited the Ukrainians in). This was the primary impact of Ukrainian immigration on Canada. I guess Native Indians could complain that their grazing and hunting areas were turned into massive wheat farms but the buffalos seem to have been hunted out prior to the Ukrainians’ arrival.

    The Ukrainians did not change the character of the French and English areas that much (Ukrainians also settled in Toronto but they were heavily outnumbered by the Italians, Portuguese and other Europeans who did far more in transforming that city than did the Ukrainians).

    Ukrainians tend to vote Conservative so if anything they have been a brake on mass immigration because for some reason the Anglos and Scots just love flooding their homelands with non-Europeans. Inconvenient Ukrainians slow down the project of self-displacement.

    I’ll happily side with anyone who wants to end this madness (rather than perpetuate it, like you do

     

    Where did I ever claim that I wanted to perpetuate it?

    Replies: @Sher Singh

  264. @sher singh
    @AP

    Your racialism and zero-sum thinking will get you punched in Canada.
    People immigrating, paying taxes & working isn't genocide & forced conversion ala Natives.
    ---
    Self-referencing as European is a Ukrainian or Balkanoid thing.
    Both places without much of a history outside Turkish harems.

    https://dharmicreality.wordpress.com/2022/05/15/mapping-the-western-right-from-a-varnashrama-lens/


    This “Nazi” faction mostly ignore caste differences and focus on the racial aspects (Shudras of whatever race, being at the lowest end of the caste ladder, prefer to ignore their lowly caste status within their race and focus on other aspects).
     
    You should show some class, and stfu. English Canada is mostly Scottish not Anglo.
    Hongcouver is a playful nickname, go back to worshipping Germans & their poo inspection toilets.

    https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/945650720026267658/1034666218554142721/unknown-144.png

    Replies: @AP

    Where did you detect racialism in my post? I was pointing out the banal fact that Brits have been displaced by educated middle and upper class Chinese and Indians in Vancouver. There is a similar but much less extreme process in Toronto. Montreal remains the same, French seems to be a barrier. Some Algerians have settled but they don’t threaten the upper or middle class native positions and there don’t seem to be so many of them there.

    People immigrating, paying taxes & working isn’t genocide & forced conversion ala Natives

    Yes, it’s certainly a gentler way of losing one’s homeland and way of life. Though I suspect that in many ways Natives are better off now as modern Canadians then they had been had Europeans never come (living as tribesmen in premodernity, killing each other, etc.). I’m not sure if the same can necessarily be said of Englishmen in Canada. I hear Singapore is nice but was London worse in the 1950s?

    • Replies: @sher singh
    @AP


    Yes, it’s certainly a gentler way of losing one’s homeland and way of life. Though I suspect that in many ways Natives are better off now as modern Canadians then they had been had Europeans never come (living as tribesmen in premodernity, killing each other, etc.)
     
    Only a materialist with no shred of dignity says this - a Whore. Guess it's not just Hoholuska.

    There is a similar but much less extreme process in Toronto. Montreal remains the same, French seems to be a barrier.
     
    No. AP goes to the Chinese parts of Vancouver - declares it bereft of English and posts un Unz.

    Yes, it’s certainly a gentler way of losing one’s homeland and way of life.
     
    Moving to the suburbs into a bigger home?

    Replies: @AP

  265. @Barbarossa
    @Sher Singh

    In all honesty, the prospect of a bunch of Sikhs taking over and keeping me from eating beef ranks about on par with Martian invasion on the list of things I'm realistically concerned about. I'll be happy to raise the threat assessment once you guys have solidified control of the Indian subcontinent.

    Replies: @sher singh, @Mikel, @Thulean Friend

    Um, who said a bunch of Sikhs would do it? I have no disagreement with Liberals or WEF on the issue

    • Replies: @Barbarossa
    @sher singh

    That is the beauty of living in the hinterlands; I can do what I want. I lived like I saw fit during the 'Vid freakout along with the majority of those around me. There was almost no disruption.

    DC or Albany or the Bavarian Illuminati can pass whatever laws they want down the pipeline concerning cow farts or anything else, but nobody will be able or interested in really enforcing. It's just not worth the effort.

    I'd like to get back to your points on tribe vs. race when I have more time since I think you are on the right track. That is what we have around me, at least to a limited degree; a certain sense of tribe and community. We have each other's backs and keep the local governments and enforcement on a reasonable and human level. The county and local governments roll their eyes at what Albany does, nods their heads, and ignores what they need to.

    Folks need to remember that national political races don't mean much; the real effect on you personally is at the local political level, and your vote really matters there.

    , @Barbarossa
    @sher singh

    To be honest, I'm pretty moderate on my meat eating in general. Overindulgence in meat seems gross and wasteful to me. I don't really get the culture war aspect of the meat thing. I agree with the libs that we should be generally be eating less meat, but my area is great for pasture and marginal for crops so it is a prudent use of the land.


    no disagreement with Liberals or WEF on the issue
     
    You know as well as I do that as soon as the lib and WEF types figure out that you aren't their nice tame darkie you'll be just as deplorable as the rest of us. ;)

    In the meantime there is quite a bit of naivete that you can exploit, which is good luck while it lasts, but keeping your identity is ultimately incompatible with liberalism.

    Replies: @Sher Singh

  266. @Matra
    @YetAnotherAnon


    On a a less sombre but still pretty important note, I can’t believe Germany is so passive, as their “allies” sever their energy arteries then stop them investigating the crime – a crime which could justify retribution.
     
    Looking at some of their media a few days ago the Germans seem more interested in laughing at Britain's leadership foibles and warning about the dangers of fascism from Italy's new government. When Trump was in office Der Spiegel in particular delighted in mocking the US, just as they did under Dubya, with their main cartoonist becoming a minor celeb - speaking truth to power & all that - yet now that they are facing outright aggression from the US they are meek little lambs.

    Meanwhile in Poland they are the opposite. Poles angrier about a suspected stolen book than Germans about pipeline sabotage?

    From Aga Tumiłowicz-Mazur's Twitter feed:

    Czytelnia Akademicka in L'viv was a Polish student scientific society active between 1867 and the beginning of WWII. Speculations ensued whether the book was stolen (and if yes, by whom? Germans? Russians?) and therefore should be returned. Some Poles are really, really upset.

    So upset in fact that they call it"fencing in broad daylight" & "slap in the face",tagging on Twitter both the 🇵🇱Ministry of Culture and the Spokesman of the M.of Foreign Affairs,the latter of which responded with "we are aware" of the case that is heating up the 🇵🇱internet.
     

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard

    Looking at some of their media a few days ago the Germans seem more interested in laughing at Britain’s leadership foibles and warning about the dangers of fascism from Italy’s new government.

    The people on the top in Germany seem to have everything hedged and baked in. They must have an enormous amount of confidence in their security service. I don’t know man. Racial fascism seems like something it would be ridiculously easy to encode. There has to be an extant new-age-pseudo-christianity that you could sell to forty million people who have lost all but the last shredded remnant of their patience and pride.

  267. sher singh says:
    @silviosilver
    @sher singh


    Why? This is why you’re gay. Equality is letting your women whore around,
    till the point you lose all sense of tribes and end up a ‘race’
     
    Because it makes for a more pleasant society, that's why. A society can essentially choose to emphasize the ways in which people are equal or the ways in which they're unequal. There's no need for the latter, since pretty much everyone already has a 'gut sense' of who's better and who's not in any given context (including a 'general' life context), so emphasizing equality helps people feel more at ease around each other and generally treat each more kindly (although probably less respectfully, but that may be a price worth paying). The basic rule for unequal interactions is: you pretend the differences between us are unimportant, and I'll pretend you haven't noticed them. That's not so hard to do.

    till the point you lose all sense of tribes and end up a ‘race’
     
    Well that's great then. Just as 'nation' is better than tribe, 'race' is better than nation. You have to remember, I am a liberal at heart. A liberal society composed of 'ballpark' standard racial homogeneity? I'll take that over 'nation' or 'ethnicity' or 'religion' or 'tribe' any day.

    The medieval church instituted marriage laws and practices that undermined large kinship groups.
     
    Nice to know Christianity was useful for something besides constituting today's European spiritual tradition.

    So is everyone else – they’re a separate species.
     
    Thanks for quoting me out of context so that I sound like a 'supremacist.' Now, to be sure, I am defiantly a 'racist,' but I drawn the line at supremacy, so I must protest my innocence.

    Nobody hates Punjabis or thinks they’re pajeets.
     
    How would you know? It's your own back people are talking behind.

    Stay butthurt balkanoid faggot,
     
    What am I butthurt about? I freely admit my peep's lack of 'greatness' and I've never proposed that any person's or group's sense of self-worth should be based on it. That obsession is something you and AP seem caught up in.

    Replies: @sher singh

    Because it makes for a more pleasant society, The basic rule for unequal interactions is: you pretend the differences between us are unimportant, and I’ll pretend you haven’t noticed them. That’s not so hard to do.

    Dishonesty is unpleasant and destroys the soul. Brotherhood is always unequal,

    Well that’s great then. Just as ‘nation’ is better than tribe, ‘race’ is better than nation. You have to remember, I am a liberal at heart. A liberal society composed of ‘ballpark’ standard racial homogeneity? I’ll take that over ‘nation’ or ‘ethnicity’ or ‘religion’ or ‘tribe’ any day.

    Then a global Brazil is best.

    Thanks for quoting me out of context so that I sound like a ‘supremacist.

    ]

    90% of the genetic distance in Homo Sapiens is between Sub-Saharan & the rest.
    The only race is Negro or not – the rest are ethnicities.
    This makes our antagonisms, and differences more valuable.

    How would you know? It’s your own back people are talking behind.

    White women aren’t really dishonest. A greasy Dago has every incentive to cause strife.
    I’m not caught up in any sense of greatness – the Maryada is correct, the Guru is great.

    I’m nothing.

    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ

    • Replies: @silviosilver
    @sher singh


    Dishonesty is unpleasant and destroys the soul.
     
    Religion is shot through with well-meaning deception, so you might want to take a look in the mirror.

    Brotherhood is always unequal,
     
    Ah, another nugget of sikh (?) 'wisdom' - you have no idea how I cherish these. It's not quite on the level of "Religion [is] a street gang to take women" but you can't hit them out of the park every time.

    Then a global Brazil is best.
     
    No, because Brazil, as a whole, doesn't meet the 'ballpark' homogeneity standard. You'd need to split it up into at least two racial entities, but preferably three or four in order for it to reach what I have in mind as 'ballpark.' Of course, this is all highly abstract, and I'm using the ballpark concept for the purposes of illustration, not because I think by itself it's in any way enough of a natural draw.

    In the real world, people need a common culture or common historical experiences to really feel they share something meaningful in common. My point is the commonality doesn't have to be as common as people with a 'tribal' mindset tend to imagine. Such people are liable to say about, for instance, Yugoslavia that it was so ethnically mixed that it was sheer fantasy to think it could ever hold together. Well, to someone with a more liberal mindset like me, the 'differences' in Yugoslavia were trivial to the point of virtual meaninglessness, and I have the same attitude towards the balkans in general (and even beyond it ). Of course, it's difficult to mash together people who speak different languages, but your own India proves that, difficult or not, it's actually possible - despite the tremendous linguistic differences there, for political purposes they're willing to act as one happy pajeet family.

    White women aren’t really dishonest. A greasy Dago has every incentive to cause strife.
     
    I have no idea what that means in relation to the post you were replying to, but it does remind me of one of my favorite dago stories. I was trying to pick up this girl at a bar once, and she called out to some bouncer she knew as he was walking past and said, teasingly, as part of the flirtation:

    Her: This guy's harassing me, can you throw him out?

    Bouncer: [looks me over] He's a dago like me, why should I?

    Her: [trying to say something but bouncer walked off]

    Me: [with a cheeky gleam] Suck. Fucking. Shit.

    That's clearly a pretty steep fall from Jane Austen standards of courtship, and I feel half guilty for acting as an agent of cultural decay myself in this instance (and numerous others like it), but guys are always going to opt for what 'works' in the moment and neglect the longer term cultural corrosion their (our) behavior generates.

    Back to the racial angle though, this was in a small regional city that hadn't seen much in the way of immigration (but which by now could be half pajeet for all I know), so there was virtually an automatic kind of solidarity among greaseballs, that often went beyond the merely humorous (as in my anecdote).

    Replies: @Sher Singh, @Emil Nikola Richard, @Wokechoke

  268. sher singh says:
    @AP
    @sher singh

    Where did you detect racialism in my post? I was pointing out the banal fact that Brits have been displaced by educated middle and upper class Chinese and Indians in Vancouver. There is a similar but much less extreme process in Toronto. Montreal remains the same, French seems to be a barrier. Some Algerians have settled but they don’t threaten the upper or middle class native positions and there don’t seem to be so many of them there.


    People immigrating, paying taxes & working isn’t genocide & forced conversion ala Natives
     
    Yes, it’s certainly a gentler way of losing one’s homeland and way of life. Though I suspect that in many ways Natives are better off now as modern Canadians then they had been had Europeans never come (living as tribesmen in premodernity, killing each other, etc.). I’m not sure if the same can necessarily be said of Englishmen in Canada. I hear Singapore is nice but was London worse in the 1950s?

    Replies: @sher singh

    Yes, it’s certainly a gentler way of losing one’s homeland and way of life. Though I suspect that in many ways Natives are better off now as modern Canadians then they had been had Europeans never come (living as tribesmen in premodernity, killing each other, etc.)

    Only a materialist with no shred of dignity says this – a Whore. Guess it’s not just Hoholuska.

    There is a similar but much less extreme process in Toronto. Montreal remains the same, French seems to be a barrier.

    No. AP goes to the Chinese parts of Vancouver – declares it bereft of English and posts un Unz.

    Yes, it’s certainly a gentler way of losing one’s homeland and way of life.

    Moving to the suburbs into a bigger home?

    • Agree: Barbarossa
    • Replies: @AP
    @sher singh


    Only a materialist with no shred of dignity
     
    There is nothing particularly dignified about that lifestyle. Romantic 19th century weirdos idealized it but their predecessors who were certainly not materialists did not. They fixed them, at great effort.

    No. AP goes to the Chinese parts of Vancouver
     
    What “Chinese parts?” - much of the city is Chinese. But not skid row, not many Chinese among the junkies. I stayed near Stanley Park and wandered around. It’s a beautiful city populated mostly by well off Asians (mostly East but a few South) with a White and Native underclass. Great sushi, presumably made by Chinese rather then Japanese or Koreans.
  269. sher singh says:
    @silviosilver
    @AP


    Matra habitually whines about Slavic immigration into British places like Canada (or indeed Britain itself).
     
    And rightly so, since in hindsight (in foresight, too, for that matter), it's proven much more of a curse than a blessing to his people. To be clear, I'm talking about the arrival of my own predecessors too here (perhaps not "slavic" in your eyes, but part of the same general wave) - every bit as much a curse as yours, perhaps even more so.

    If southern and eastern Europeans were the only (or at least overwhelming) beneficiaries of immigrationist largess - as was once the case - I'd probably lie through my teeth about its wonders just as you do. But we're not, so I'll happily side with anyone who wants to end this madness (rather than perpetuate it, like you do), even if in the course of ending it dirty, hidden truths are aired.

    Replies: @sher singh, @AP

    Ukranians made Canada multicultural, and actively seek British areas.
    Every other group incl Meds, Slavs etc keep to themselves.

    Pan-Europeanism is a weasel term like Judeo-Christian – the Khazars were from Ukraine.
    6 Lakh Ukr Refugees isn’t for a state than a bunch of educated S/E Asians.

    I’m just pointing out that the main impact will be to dilute the impact of the deliberate flooding of British territories by non-Europeans that for some reason British pursue as policy wherever they have settled.

    The Great Ukrainian saves the world from itself.
    If his woman makes a quick buck along the way all the better..
    The more the merrier.

    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ

  270. @silviosilver
    @AP


    Matra habitually whines about Slavic immigration into British places like Canada (or indeed Britain itself).
     
    And rightly so, since in hindsight (in foresight, too, for that matter), it's proven much more of a curse than a blessing to his people. To be clear, I'm talking about the arrival of my own predecessors too here (perhaps not "slavic" in your eyes, but part of the same general wave) - every bit as much a curse as yours, perhaps even more so.

    If southern and eastern Europeans were the only (or at least overwhelming) beneficiaries of immigrationist largess - as was once the case - I'd probably lie through my teeth about its wonders just as you do. But we're not, so I'll happily side with anyone who wants to end this madness (rather than perpetuate it, like you do), even if in the course of ending it dirty, hidden truths are aired.

    Replies: @sher singh, @AP

    And rightly so, since in hindsight (in foresight, too, for that matter), it’s proven much more of a curse than a blessing to his people. To be clear, I’m talking about the arrival of my own predecessors too here (perhaps not “slavic” in your eyes, but part of the same general wave) – every bit as much a curse as yours, perhaps even more so

    Unlike most of the other Southern and Eastern European immigrants in Canada, Ukrainians were a settler nation who came to basically empty lands and turned them into highly productive farmland and Canada into one of the world’s main agricultural exporters. That settlement also prevented the Americans from claiming the empty territory (another reason the British/ Canadian authorities invited the Ukrainians in). This was the primary impact of Ukrainian immigration on Canada. I guess Native Indians could complain that their grazing and hunting areas were turned into massive wheat farms but the buffalos seem to have been hunted out prior to the Ukrainians’ arrival.

    The Ukrainians did not change the character of the French and English areas that much (Ukrainians also settled in Toronto but they were heavily outnumbered by the Italians, Portuguese and other Europeans who did far more in transforming that city than did the Ukrainians).

    Ukrainians tend to vote Conservative so if anything they have been a brake on mass immigration because for some reason the Anglos and Scots just love flooding their homelands with non-Europeans. Inconvenient Ukrainians slow down the project of self-displacement.

    I’ll happily side with anyone who wants to end this madness (rather than perpetuate it, like you do

    Where did I ever claim that I wanted to perpetuate it?

    • Disagree: Sher Singh
    • Replies: @Sher Singh
    @AP

    Immigration has a bi-partisan consensus in Canada.
    Ukranians vote Conservative in Alberta & Liberal in Ontario.

    They do ethnic politics - all candidates in a Ukr area will be Ukr.
    Anglos haven't been displaced cities just grew - the GVA is one city & plenty white.

    https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-canadians-more-supportive-than-ever-of-immigration-new-poll-finds-but/

    Conservatives brought in mass immigration & gun licenses LOL.
    Canadians don't race-bait - this is your bid at acceptance.

    If all you can do is point at how much worse the other guy is..

    Replies: @AP

  271. @sher singh
    @AP


    Yes, it’s certainly a gentler way of losing one’s homeland and way of life. Though I suspect that in many ways Natives are better off now as modern Canadians then they had been had Europeans never come (living as tribesmen in premodernity, killing each other, etc.)
     
    Only a materialist with no shred of dignity says this - a Whore. Guess it's not just Hoholuska.

    There is a similar but much less extreme process in Toronto. Montreal remains the same, French seems to be a barrier.
     
    No. AP goes to the Chinese parts of Vancouver - declares it bereft of English and posts un Unz.

    Yes, it’s certainly a gentler way of losing one’s homeland and way of life.
     
    Moving to the suburbs into a bigger home?

    Replies: @AP

    Only a materialist with no shred of dignity

    There is nothing particularly dignified about that lifestyle. Romantic 19th century weirdos idealized it but their predecessors who were certainly not materialists did not. They fixed them, at great effort.

    No. AP goes to the Chinese parts of Vancouver

    What “Chinese parts?” – much of the city is Chinese. But not skid row, not many Chinese among the junkies. I stayed near Stanley Park and wandered around. It’s a beautiful city populated mostly by well off Asians (mostly East but a few South) with a White and Native underclass. Great sushi, presumably made by Chinese rather then Japanese or Koreans.

  272. Sher Singh says:
    @AP
    @silviosilver


    And rightly so, since in hindsight (in foresight, too, for that matter), it’s proven much more of a curse than a blessing to his people. To be clear, I’m talking about the arrival of my own predecessors too here (perhaps not “slavic” in your eyes, but part of the same general wave) – every bit as much a curse as yours, perhaps even more so
     
    Unlike most of the other Southern and Eastern European immigrants in Canada, Ukrainians were a settler nation who came to basically empty lands and turned them into highly productive farmland and Canada into one of the world’s main agricultural exporters. That settlement also prevented the Americans from claiming the empty territory (another reason the British/ Canadian authorities invited the Ukrainians in). This was the primary impact of Ukrainian immigration on Canada. I guess Native Indians could complain that their grazing and hunting areas were turned into massive wheat farms but the buffalos seem to have been hunted out prior to the Ukrainians’ arrival.

    The Ukrainians did not change the character of the French and English areas that much (Ukrainians also settled in Toronto but they were heavily outnumbered by the Italians, Portuguese and other Europeans who did far more in transforming that city than did the Ukrainians).

    Ukrainians tend to vote Conservative so if anything they have been a brake on mass immigration because for some reason the Anglos and Scots just love flooding their homelands with non-Europeans. Inconvenient Ukrainians slow down the project of self-displacement.

    I’ll happily side with anyone who wants to end this madness (rather than perpetuate it, like you do

     

    Where did I ever claim that I wanted to perpetuate it?

    Replies: @Sher Singh

    Immigration has a bi-partisan consensus in Canada.
    Ukranians vote Conservative in Alberta & Liberal in Ontario.

    They do ethnic politics – all candidates in a Ukr area will be Ukr.
    Anglos haven’t been displaced cities just grew – the GVA is one city & plenty white.

    https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-canadians-more-supportive-than-ever-of-immigration-new-poll-finds-but/

    Conservatives brought in mass immigration & gun licenses LOL.
    Canadians don’t race-bait – this is your bid at acceptance.

    If all you can do is point at how much worse the other guy is..

    • Replies: @AP
    @Sher Singh

    There are a few prominent ethnic Ukrainian Liberal politicians from Ontario but the people tend to vote Conservative there. The famous far right politician in Toronto who came in third place during a mayoral election is an ethnic Ukrainian (don’t know anyone who supported her though):

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faith_Goldy

    Replies: @Sher Singh, @Matra

  273. @Sher Singh
    @AP

    Immigration has a bi-partisan consensus in Canada.
    Ukranians vote Conservative in Alberta & Liberal in Ontario.

    They do ethnic politics - all candidates in a Ukr area will be Ukr.
    Anglos haven't been displaced cities just grew - the GVA is one city & plenty white.

    https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-canadians-more-supportive-than-ever-of-immigration-new-poll-finds-but/

    Conservatives brought in mass immigration & gun licenses LOL.
    Canadians don't race-bait - this is your bid at acceptance.

    If all you can do is point at how much worse the other guy is..

    Replies: @AP

    There are a few prominent ethnic Ukrainian Liberal politicians from Ontario but the people tend to vote Conservative there. The famous far right politician in Toronto who came in third place during a mayoral election is an ethnic Ukrainian (don’t know anyone who supported her though):

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faith_Goldy

    • Replies: @Sher Singh
    @AP

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parkdale%E2%80%94High_Park#Members_of_Parliament

    Everyone but the Chinese (Cons) or Muslims (Lib) swing votes.
    Stop trying to recruit for Azov lol & Goldy is a leftist with a Greek dad.

    Your entire narrative is racialist & if you're too stupid to realize it then w/e.
    Not much dif than the German toilet poker who thinks it's cool.

    --
    Just another mentally ill online nationalist.

    Replies: @AP

    , @Matra
    @AP


    There are a few prominent ethnic Ukrainian Liberal politicians from Ontario but the people tend to vote Conservative there
     
    Even if true, I'm not so sure about the numbers, it was only after it became a multiculti party. Back when it mattered and there was still a chance of preserving the nation the Ukrainians of Ontario along with pretty much all the non-Germanic ethnic Europeans voted Liberal. Since about 2006 even Jews - the most anti-national, anti-Christian demographic to ever exist - vote Conservative because they know it is really just the old Liberal Party their parents and grandparents grew up with. (If it became populist, anti-immigration - it won't! - the Jews would do what US neocons did after Trump and return to their original party). Voting Conservative means nothing in Canada, at least not at the federal level. But it wouldn't surprise me if future Ukrainian citizens (hundreds of thousands are arriving) vote for them in significant numbers as there are no differences on Ukraine policy between the Conservatives & Liberals and also because there is no longer a rival Anglo identity attached to the CP.

    Replies: @AP

  274. Why are Anglosphere Indian communities so disproportionately Punjabi Sikh? from AskHistorians

    8 comments so far but none are considered acceptable.

    I wonder if anybody else has noticed those fuckers are so damn rude that even India doesn’t want them.

    • Replies: @Sher Singh
    @Emil Nikola Richard

    The avg Hindu considers Sikhs patriotic supersoldiers.
    Butthurt whitnats online can wallow in hate all they want..

  275. Sher Singh says:
    @AP
    @Sher Singh

    There are a few prominent ethnic Ukrainian Liberal politicians from Ontario but the people tend to vote Conservative there. The famous far right politician in Toronto who came in third place during a mayoral election is an ethnic Ukrainian (don’t know anyone who supported her though):

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faith_Goldy

    Replies: @Sher Singh, @Matra

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parkdale%E2%80%94High_Park#Members_of_Parliament

    Everyone but the Chinese (Cons) or Muslims (Lib) swing votes.
    Stop trying to recruit for Azov lol & Goldy is a leftist with a Greek dad.

    Your entire narrative is racialist & if you’re too stupid to realize it then w/e.
    Not much dif than the German toilet poker who thinks it’s cool.


    Just another mentally ill online nationalist.

    • Replies: @AP
    @Sher Singh

    The Ukrainians have largely left that neighborhood for points further west such as Etobicoke. That is now the most Ukrainian part of Toronto. They still have some infrastructure and a few residents in Bloor West but it isn’t as heavily Ukrainian as it once was.

    Replies: @Sher Singh

  276. @Barbarossa
    @Sher Singh

    In all honesty, the prospect of a bunch of Sikhs taking over and keeping me from eating beef ranks about on par with Martian invasion on the list of things I'm realistically concerned about. I'll be happy to raise the threat assessment once you guys have solidified control of the Indian subcontinent.

    Replies: @sher singh, @Mikel, @Thulean Friend

    the prospect of a bunch of Sikhs taking over and keeping me from eating beef ranks about on par with Martian invasion on the list of things I’m realistically concerned about.

    If the Martians are peaceful I think I’d rate the beef abolitionists as a bigger threat to human well-being.

    To my knowledge, Sher Singh has never explained what’s wrong with eating beef anyway. He should just try a properly aged rib-steak and he’d forget all those archaic myths.

    • Replies: @Sher Singh
    @Mikel

    Both dog & beef eating are UnAryan. You can find reasons why they're bad.


    I understand that it's become a culture war issue between White untouchables & Libs.
    It's not really our problem, men with Weapons don't explain themselves.

    The Guru has ordered an end to cow slaughter.

    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ

    Replies: @Mikel

    , @sudden death
    @Mikel


    To my knowledge, Sher Singh has never explained what’s wrong with eating beef anyway. He should just try a properly aged rib-steak and he’d forget all those archaic myths.
     
    Just a guess, but those types of eating taboos probably had some slight rational background which was forgotten eons ago since they were instituted, like some epidemic or poisoning, e.g. probable ancient local spikes of mad cow disesases, when communities were affected and had human victims on noticable scale.

    The same with Arab pork or alcohol ban, e.g. ancient tribes there quite likely were enough hot-headed even when sober, so wine consumption probably had absolutely devastating violent effect on inner social order when consumption began, so some sort of religious reasons had to be invented to deal with it.

    Replies: @sher singh, @songbird

    , @Barbarossa
    @Mikel

    I respect the reasons for not eating beef, even if I don't subscribe. The cow is giver of milk and is therefore a mother figure, providing countless calories over her lifetime. Also, for Hindu's, there are a variety of theological reasons for the sacred place of the cow.

    There also seem to be a variety of opinions within Sikhism on eating meat in general or beef in particular. I'm no expert, so can't adjudicate, but it seems to come in from Hindu influence.

    https://sikhheritageeducation.com/meat-eating-is-it-permissible-for-sikhs/

    I live in a place with long winters and can't be feeding hay to plethora of useless bulls anyhow. I respect my milk cow and she deserves a good retirement when no longer able to produce milk.

    Replies: @Sher Singh, @Mikel

  277. @Emil Nikola Richard
    https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/ydjpdo/why_are_anglosphere_indian_communities_so/

    8 comments so far but none are considered acceptable.

    I wonder if anybody else has noticed those fuckers are so damn rude that even India doesn't want them.

    Replies: @Sher Singh

    The avg Hindu considers Sikhs patriotic supersoldiers.
    Butthurt whitnats online can wallow in hate all they want..

  278. @Mikel
    @Barbarossa


    the prospect of a bunch of Sikhs taking over and keeping me from eating beef ranks about on par with Martian invasion on the list of things I’m realistically concerned about.
     
    If the Martians are peaceful I think I'd rate the beef abolitionists as a bigger threat to human well-being.

    To my knowledge, Sher Singh has never explained what's wrong with eating beef anyway. He should just try a properly aged rib-steak and he'd forget all those archaic myths.

    Replies: @Sher Singh, @sudden death, @Barbarossa

    Both dog & beef eating are UnAryan. You can find reasons why they’re bad.

    I understand that it’s become a culture war issue between White untouchables & Libs.
    It’s not really our problem, men with Weapons don’t explain themselves.

    The Guru has ordered an end to cow slaughter.

    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ

    • Replies: @Mikel
    @Sher Singh


    Both dog & beef eating are UnAryan.
     
    That's like putting rotten acorns and almonds in the same food category. You don't know what you're talking about. As I said, just try some top quality steak and then you'll be able to come back and discuss culinary matters.

    Replies: @Mikhail, @Sean, @sher singh

  279. @Sher Singh
    @AP

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parkdale%E2%80%94High_Park#Members_of_Parliament

    Everyone but the Chinese (Cons) or Muslims (Lib) swing votes.
    Stop trying to recruit for Azov lol & Goldy is a leftist with a Greek dad.

    Your entire narrative is racialist & if you're too stupid to realize it then w/e.
    Not much dif than the German toilet poker who thinks it's cool.

    --
    Just another mentally ill online nationalist.

    Replies: @AP

    The Ukrainians have largely left that neighborhood for points further west such as Etobicoke. That is now the most Ukrainian part of Toronto. They still have some infrastructure and a few residents in Bloor West but it isn’t as heavily Ukrainian as it once was.

    • Replies: @Sher Singh
    @AP

    Toronto is hard Liberal for decades now. I went to school in C Etobicoke.
    That whole area from Bloor to Burnamthorpe/Sauga is still Slavic esp since 2014.

    Toronto's not shitlib outside the downtown core & Conservatives have done more for immigration.
    Ukrainians aren't a secret society, and are tight with Sikhs or just about anyone.

  280. @YetAnotherAnon
    @LatW


    " victims deserve justice. It’s easy to speak that way about other people’s children. If your people were victims, you would be ok to say – let us not seek justice. But do not speak that way about others. "
     
    Lots of peoples have been victims of war crimes and have not sought justice. The children of Germany and Japan for starters.

    https://i.postimg.cc/9MLdCRDT/Bundesarchiv-Bild-146-1979-025-19-A-Koeln-Kinderleichen-nach-Luftangriff.jpg


    On a a less sombre but still pretty important note, I can't believe Germany is so passive, as their "allies" sever their energy arteries then stop them investigating the crime - a crime which could justify retribution.

    https://cdn.locals.com/images/posts/originals/1987197/1987197_wl6tkn5myax6kup.jpeg

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @Matra, @LatW

    Lots of peoples have been victims of war crimes and have not sought justice

    Unfortunately, they weren’t able to. It remains to be seen if the Ukrainians will be able to.

    [MORE]

    I can’t believe Germany is so passive, as their “allies” sever their energy arteries then stop them investigating the crime – a crime which could justify retribution.

    Don’t know if it’s a “crime” (although certainly will put a strain on the elderly and other vulnerable groups, not to mention potential layoffs if they will happen), it’s just generally a super unfortunate situation. It’s the last thing we needed, but it’s not that we didn’t see it coming. Covid was a weakening factor, so it’s not surprising that a war (or some kind of reshuffling of power) would follow after something like that.

    What is interesting, though, is how willingly Germany has stepped up to the leadership role in the future reconstruction program. Of course, the funds will be coming from various sources, but I thought the “allies&friends” would have to implore Germany much longer and harder, but Germany seems to have assumed that leadership position rather willingly.

    It might be that they’re seeing long term opportunities there. And of course you can’t have ruins forever on your doorstep.

    • Replies: @YetAnotherAnon
    @LatW

    I would not say that Ukraine is on the German doorstep. Poland might have something to say.

    "how willingly Germany has stepped up to the leadership role in the future reconstruction program"

    As any future reconstruction program will probably need Russian assent, it's a pretty safe bet to volunteer for the rebuild.

    "It might be that they’re seeing long term opportunities there."

    It'll need to be a YUGE opportunity to compensate for the loss of Russian gas. And they've dumped their nuke power.

    No, the US Ukraine policy has inflicted a near-mortal blow on the mighty German economy. Third time in 104 years, but at least they declared their emnity the last two times.

    Replies: @LatW

  281. @sher singh
    @Barbarossa

    Um, who said a bunch of Sikhs would do it? I have no disagreement with Liberals or WEF on the issue

    Replies: @Barbarossa, @Barbarossa

    That is the beauty of living in the hinterlands; I can do what I want. I lived like I saw fit during the ‘Vid freakout along with the majority of those around me. There was almost no disruption.

    DC or Albany or the Bavarian Illuminati can pass whatever laws they want down the pipeline concerning cow farts or anything else, but nobody will be able or interested in really enforcing. It’s just not worth the effort.

    I’d like to get back to your points on tribe vs. race when I have more time since I think you are on the right track. That is what we have around me, at least to a limited degree; a certain sense of tribe and community. We have each other’s backs and keep the local governments and enforcement on a reasonable and human level. The county and local governments roll their eyes at what Albany does, nods their heads, and ignores what they need to.

    Folks need to remember that national political races don’t mean much; the real effect on you personally is at the local political level, and your vote really matters there.

    • Thanks: sher singh
  282. Don’t know if it’s a “crime”

    Oh, you meant the explosions… yes, strange. Did you know there were a few arrests in Norway, too, recently, and just generally strange activity by the pipelines there as well as in the High North.

  283. @silviosilver
    @AP


    Once upon a time the British Europeans displaced the native Indians and now the cycle continues and the Chinese and Asian Indians have displaced the British Europeans,
     
    Lol, as I never tire of pointing out, the racial bullshit never ceases with this mendacious worm.

    The "cycle continues", you see. It's just a natural part of the rhythm of life. Has nothing to do with, you know, deliberate fucking policy.

    I must say it's interesting the way AP gets off on taunting the very people he is most relying on to aid his precious Ukraine. The extreme butthurt he feels - let's face it, it's gotta hurt for a prideful Uke to think his country could soon be outclassed by even the lowly pajeets of hindoostan - makes him say very weird and very spiteful things.

    Replies: @sher singh, @AP, @LatW, @Wokechoke

    I must say it’s interesting the way AP gets off on taunting the very people he is most relying on to aid his precious Ukraine. The extreme butthurt he feels – let’s face it, it’s gotta hurt for a prideful Uke to think his country could soon be outclassed by even the lowly pajeets of hindoostan – makes him say very weird and very spiteful things.

    That’s not really how a typical Ukrainian (from Ukraine) thinks, though, it’s an attitude more in line with middle class or upper middle class SWPLs in the West (I’ve heard it from them before, too, using almost exactly the same language, “it’s a cycle”, “it’s how history goes”, I was dumbfounded, tbh, and when I first heard it what shocked me the most was the ease of the acceptance of these facts on the ground, not to mention I felt deeply offended, this was a rich Scots Irish boomer woman who said this, completely oblivious to her children’s and grandchildren’s future). It’s not how a typical Ukrainian who had been raised in Ukraine would think. Not at all. First, this is not even on their radar right now. Second, if they did think about the replacement, even some of the normies (not to even mention the nationalists) would feel a bit taken aback if they saw what’s really going on. They will definitely care if it starts happening in UA. The only question is if they’ll have the resources to withstand it.

    [MORE]

    It is kind of true though that first they displaced the Natives. It’s just that does it really mean that the new settlers would have to be displaced, too? It’s an ideological question.

    • Thanks: S
    • Replies: @Coconuts
    @LatW


    I was dumbfounded, tbh, and when I first heard it what shocked me the most was the ease of the acceptance of these facts on the ground, not to mention I felt deeply offended, this was a rich Scots Irish boomer woman who said this, completely oblivious to her children’s and grandchildren’s future.
     
    I think there is this thing among liberal boomers, where they are moralistic about being hedonistic and self-centred during their lifetime, and then their life can be crowned by the altruistic gift of handing on their territory and assets to what they perceive as oppressed groups after their death.

    This is probably one of the things contributing to the currently growing idea that group identity is more important and real than individual identity and experience. Boomers' children can therefore offer valid atonement and must make amends for the perceived shortcomings of their parents, grandparents, great-grandparents etc. It's sort of masked to some extent as relating to impersonal 'systems of social power'.


    First, this is not even on their radar right now. Second, if they did think about the replacement, even some of the normies (not to even mention the nationalists) would feel a bit taken aback if they saw what’s really going on. They will definitely care if it starts happening in UA. The only question is if they’ll have the resources to withstand it.
     
    That seems to fit closely with the attitude of the Belarusians I know, except it feels like the ones living in the UK are becoming aware of something weird going on in British/Anglo society.

    It is kind of true though that first they displaced the Natives. It’s just that does it really mean that the new settlers would have to be displaced, too? It’s an ideological question.
     
    You find similar arguments being put forward in Britain itself, by white British people; because British people from some time ago went to North America and Australia and committed genocide against the natives, large shrinking of the white population and large immigration from Africa and South Asia into the UK is appropriate justice or payback and so is a positive thing.

    At the same time, the idea that demographic change is happening is often still considered a relatively outlandish or left-field racist idea, you seem to find people who hold the two ideas simultaneously. Similar to the immigration parallax thing from the US.

    Replies: @LatW

    , @S
    @LatW


    I’ve heard it from them before, too, using almost exactly the same language, “it’s a cycle”, “it’s how history goes”, I was dumbfounded, tbh, and when I first heard it what shocked me the most was the ease of the acceptance of these facts on the ground...
     
    They've been brainwashed.

    They've also been presented with a crazy false dichotomy, ie either willfully accept your murder as a people (ie genocide in the truest sense of that much abused term via crudely and barbarically being 'mixed' out of existance) as 'reparations', or, you're a bigot.



    Guilt and shame have a place, to bring about self correction. It is not, however, to be cynically used/manipulated as a weapon by some to bring about the destruction or suicide of others.

    If one feels reparations of some type (within reason) are in order, sure, but within the context of one living, not dieing. Colonization of one's own homeland, the accompanying mass murder, rapine, and genocide of one's own people via 'mixing', isn't reparations, however, but simply destruction. Healthy people (dare it be said normal people) don't engage in that type of thing, nor do they advocate it for others.

    As for reasonable reparations, can they ever really be paid back? For example, could the Mongolian descendants of Ghengis Khan, or the descendants of the original conquerers of the Islamic Caliphate, ever pay back for their forebear's murders and enslavement of others?

    However, if reparations in regard to the Anglosphere were to be paid, I'd be tempted to start with the confiscation of the great estates of the descendants of the progressives and their hangers on who ran the North American chattel slave trade from New England, to not only be paid to others, but to a great many of their own Anglo-Saxon people who had to suffer under it.

    Those reparations on their part would be in conjunction with a true abolition of the still on going slavery, wage slavery, ie the early 19th century monetization of chattel slavery and its trade, specifically the so called cheap labor/mass immigration system. Wage slavery is the economic and political basis of the modern progressive Multi-Cultural state, a state which not coincidentally closely parallels the Anglosphere chattel slave holding society it directly evolved from.

    Within the Anglosphere, folks should self identify with those who didn't own chattel slaves and had to suffer grievously under the system, which was most people. Just as with chattel slavery, wage slavery (ie so called 'cheap labor') was put in place by diktat. People weren't asked if they wanted it. To be sure, the chattel and wage slavery corrupted elites and their hangers on should have been overthrown long ago, the Civil War having been a major missed opportunity imo to have done so.

    Also, it's good to remind oneself every now and again, that within this tired and old manufactured and broadly controlled (crimethink, I know) Capitalist vs Communist, Right vs Left, etc, dialectic which has been in place since the late 18th century, the British and French Empires, not to mention the United States, were operating under the guidance (if not control) of the self proclaimed 'enlightened'/'progressive' types.

    Lastly, after reasonably doing what one can to stop error and (if appropriate or possible) make amends, forgive yourself, even if others won't.

    Replies: @LatW

  284. @LatW
    @YetAnotherAnon


    Lots of peoples have been victims of war crimes and have not sought justice
     
    Unfortunately, they weren't able to. It remains to be seen if the Ukrainians will be able to.

    I can’t believe Germany is so passive, as their “allies” sever their energy arteries then stop them investigating the crime – a crime which could justify retribution.
     
    Don't know if it's a "crime" (although certainly will put a strain on the elderly and other vulnerable groups, not to mention potential layoffs if they will happen), it's just generally a super unfortunate situation. It's the last thing we needed, but it's not that we didn't see it coming. Covid was a weakening factor, so it's not surprising that a war (or some kind of reshuffling of power) would follow after something like that.

    What is interesting, though, is how willingly Germany has stepped up to the leadership role in the future reconstruction program. Of course, the funds will be coming from various sources, but I thought the "allies&friends" would have to implore Germany much longer and harder, but Germany seems to have assumed that leadership position rather willingly.

    It might be that they're seeing long term opportunities there. And of course you can't have ruins forever on your doorstep.

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon

    I would not say that Ukraine is on the German doorstep. Poland might have something to say.

    “how willingly Germany has stepped up to the leadership role in the future reconstruction program”

    As any future reconstruction program will probably need Russian assent, it’s a pretty safe bet to volunteer for the rebuild.

    “It might be that they’re seeing long term opportunities there.”

    It’ll need to be a YUGE opportunity to compensate for the loss of Russian gas. And they’ve dumped their nuke power.

    No, the US Ukraine policy has inflicted a near-mortal blow on the mighty German economy. Third time in 104 years, but at least they declared their emnity the last two times.

    • Replies: @LatW
    @YetAnotherAnon


    I would not say that Ukraine is on the German doorstep.
     
    That's not how they think in Europe these days (not that they didn't think that way in the 1940s either, surely they felt bold enough to walk into Ukraine back then). Not at the EU institutional level at least. The population, too, agrees at least partly. And it's too close and too big.

    Poland might have something to say.
     
    Poland has done a lot - Poland has taken in a million refugees and has upgraded her military, Poland is no slacker. Poland could win out of this (if the war doesn't spread).

    As any future reconstruction program will probably need Russian assent, it’s a pretty safe bet to volunteer for the rebuild.
     
    Yes, but I wasn't thinking so much of the security angle, but that they stepped up so quickly to take up a leading position where this most likely will impose financial obligations on them (given the current recessionary environment and the energy problems they are dealing with). Obviously, they're thinking decades ahead (as they always do), but still, I wasn't expecting they would volunteer so quickly. I was expecting that they would need to be encouraged more. There must be something to it.

    It’ll need to be a YUGE opportunity to compensate for the loss of Russian gas. And they’ve dumped their nuke power.
     
    Well, if they have consigned themselves to not using Russian gas for the foreseeable future, then they might be looking for other opportunities. They shouldn't push out EEs in the process, it should be done as a common effort. This should be a Kyiv centric endeavor.

    Btw, the war is, of course, a huge drag on the economy of global proportions, however, please, do take the general economic situation into account. The slowdown and the inflation problems had already started before. The tech bubble burst in the US just this year. And what was happening in the US housing and stocks was just insane - it was bound to reverse. The situation in Europe is tougher, ofc. But again - housing in Europe (and the general cost of living issue) was going up already before the Russian invasion in Ukraine.

  285. @sher singh
    @Barbarossa

    Um, who said a bunch of Sikhs would do it? I have no disagreement with Liberals or WEF on the issue

    Replies: @Barbarossa, @Barbarossa

    To be honest, I’m pretty moderate on my meat eating in general. Overindulgence in meat seems gross and wasteful to me. I don’t really get the culture war aspect of the meat thing. I agree with the libs that we should be generally be eating less meat, but my area is great for pasture and marginal for crops so it is a prudent use of the land.

    no disagreement with Liberals or WEF on the issue

    You know as well as I do that as soon as the lib and WEF types figure out that you aren’t their nice tame darkie you’ll be just as deplorable as the rest of us. 😉

    In the meantime there is quite a bit of naivete that you can exploit, which is good luck while it lasts, but keeping your identity is ultimately incompatible with liberalism.

    • Replies: @Sher Singh
    @Barbarossa

    They know - they just expect to use us as Foederati.
    Na Sikhs are far more 'deplorable' to them lol.

    http://exiledonline.com/war-nerd-classic-in-praise-of-sikhs-the-coolest-warrior-tribe-around/
    https://doomeroptimism.substack.com/p/lessons-for-localists-the-great-indian

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mx03kaVIoYE

    India tries to kill off the identity once every decade lol.


    If you transported a Rg Vedic Arya into the India of today, where do you think he would be most at home? In Gurgaon (tech city), or, at a camp of Nihang Singhs at Singhu border?
     
    https://sialmirzagoraya.substack.com/p/the-paracolonialism-of-the-liberal

    Show me on Aryan God whose hair is cut & I will cut my head off and place it in front of you||
    That is the reality,

    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ
  286. Sher Singh says:
    @AP
    @Sher Singh

    The Ukrainians have largely left that neighborhood for points further west such as Etobicoke. That is now the most Ukrainian part of Toronto. They still have some infrastructure and a few residents in Bloor West but it isn’t as heavily Ukrainian as it once was.

    Replies: @Sher Singh

    Toronto is hard Liberal for decades now. I went to school in C Etobicoke.
    That whole area from Bloor to Burnamthorpe/Sauga is still Slavic esp since 2014.

    Toronto’s not shitlib outside the downtown core & Conservatives have done more for immigration.
    Ukrainians aren’t a secret society, and are tight with Sikhs or just about anyone.

  287. Sher Singh says:
    @Barbarossa
    @sher singh

    To be honest, I'm pretty moderate on my meat eating in general. Overindulgence in meat seems gross and wasteful to me. I don't really get the culture war aspect of the meat thing. I agree with the libs that we should be generally be eating less meat, but my area is great for pasture and marginal for crops so it is a prudent use of the land.


    no disagreement with Liberals or WEF on the issue
     
    You know as well as I do that as soon as the lib and WEF types figure out that you aren't their nice tame darkie you'll be just as deplorable as the rest of us. ;)

    In the meantime there is quite a bit of naivete that you can exploit, which is good luck while it lasts, but keeping your identity is ultimately incompatible with liberalism.

    Replies: @Sher Singh

    They know – they just expect to use us as Foederati.
    Na Sikhs are far more ‘deplorable’ to them lol.

    http://exiledonline.com/war-nerd-classic-in-praise-of-sikhs-the-coolest-warrior-tribe-around/
    https://doomeroptimism.substack.com/p/lessons-for-localists-the-great-indian

    India tries to kill off the identity once every decade lol.

    If you transported a Rg Vedic Arya into the India of today, where do you think he would be most at home? In Gurgaon (tech city), or, at a camp of Nihang Singhs at Singhu border?

    https://sialmirzagoraya.substack.com/p/the-paracolonialism-of-the-liberal

    Show me on Aryan God whose hair is cut & I will cut my head off and place it in front of you||
    That is the reality,

    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ

  288. @Mikel
    @Barbarossa


    the prospect of a bunch of Sikhs taking over and keeping me from eating beef ranks about on par with Martian invasion on the list of things I’m realistically concerned about.
     
    If the Martians are peaceful I think I'd rate the beef abolitionists as a bigger threat to human well-being.

    To my knowledge, Sher Singh has never explained what's wrong with eating beef anyway. He should just try a properly aged rib-steak and he'd forget all those archaic myths.

    Replies: @Sher Singh, @sudden death, @Barbarossa

    To my knowledge, Sher Singh has never explained what’s wrong with eating beef anyway. He should just try a properly aged rib-steak and he’d forget all those archaic myths.

    Just a guess, but those types of eating taboos probably had some slight rational background which was forgotten eons ago since they were instituted, like some epidemic or poisoning, e.g. probable ancient local spikes of mad cow disesases, when communities were affected and had human victims on noticable scale.

    The same with Arab pork or alcohol ban, e.g. ancient tribes there quite likely were enough hot-headed even when sober, so wine consumption probably had absolutely devastating violent effect on inner social order when consumption began, so some sort of religious reasons had to be invented to deal with it.

    • Agree: Mikel
    • LOL: LatW
    • Replies: @sher singh
    @sudden death


    The same with Arab pork or alcohol ban, e.g. ancient tribes there quite likely were enough hot-headed even when sober, so wine consumption probably had absolutely devastating violent effect on inner social order when consumption began, so some sort of religious reasons had to be invented to deal with it.
     
    The Arabic wine one is simple - it's allowed in heaven, but denied on Earth.
    Understand religion as a war-making cohesion building tool.

    Wine is de facto allowed in the palace too for that matter - many a Sultan slept with bottle under bed.
    Religion isn't about rational problem-solving it's a street gang to take women.

    Christianity differs in this aspect, but :shrug: Europeans solve this by just not being that Christian.
    , @songbird
    @sudden death

    Mad cow is extremely rare and has a long incubation period in humans. If it existed at all in the past (doubtful, probably a result of industrial farms, where they feed cow parts to cows), they wouldn't have had the epidemiological methods or sense to isolate it and make the connection, especially in the background of general death.

    I don't believe in these theories about trichomoniasis, etc. There is a reason for dietary strictures - namely it massively aids group cohesiveness to keep out foreigners from every meal. Of course, it is very un-PC to acknowledge this, and much more PC to posit that Semites had some special knowledge of sanitation, and it was all in the service of health.

    Replies: @sudden death

  289. @AP
    @Sher Singh

    There are a few prominent ethnic Ukrainian Liberal politicians from Ontario but the people tend to vote Conservative there. The famous far right politician in Toronto who came in third place during a mayoral election is an ethnic Ukrainian (don’t know anyone who supported her though):

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faith_Goldy

    Replies: @Sher Singh, @Matra

    There are a few prominent ethnic Ukrainian Liberal politicians from Ontario but the people tend to vote Conservative there

    Even if true, I’m not so sure about the numbers, it was only after it became a multiculti party. Back when it mattered and there was still a chance of preserving the nation the Ukrainians of Ontario along with pretty much all the non-Germanic ethnic Europeans voted Liberal. Since about 2006 even Jews – the most anti-national, anti-Christian demographic to ever exist – vote Conservative because they know it is really just the old Liberal Party their parents and grandparents grew up with. (If it became populist, anti-immigration – it won’t! – the Jews would do what US neocons did after Trump and return to their original party). Voting Conservative means nothing in Canada, at least not at the federal level. But it wouldn’t surprise me if future Ukrainian citizens (hundreds of thousands are arriving) vote for them in significant numbers as there are no differences on Ukraine policy between the Conservatives & Liberals and also because there is no longer a rival Anglo identity attached to the CP.

    • Agree: sher singh
    • Replies: @AP
    @Matra


    Back when it mattered and there was still a chance of preserving the nation the Ukrainians of Ontario along with pretty much all the non-Germanic ethnic Europeans voted Liberal. Since about 2006…
     
    A Ukrainian, Michael Starr (Starchewsky) briefly led the Canadian Progressive Conservative party in the late 1960s. His parents emigrated from Galicia to Ontario.

    John Yaremko was in he longest serving provinces cabinet minister. He was a Conservative in Ontario, served from 1951-1975.

    Ukrainians in Canada were mostly voting Conservative through the 80s and 90s. It was an anti-Communist thing. IIRC Mulroney was the first western leader to recognize Ukraine’s independence.

    The Conservative premier of Ontario from 2002-2003 was a Ukrainian.


    But it wouldn’t surprise me if future Ukrainian citizens (hundreds of thousands are arriving) vote for them in significant numbers as there are no differences on Ukraine policy between the Conservatives & Liberals and also because there is no longer a rival Anglo identity attached to the CP.
     
    The candidate for the new populist Canadian party in Canada for Etobicoke was a Ukrainian. But the riding was won by an ethnic Ukrainian of the Liberal Party. In Ontario there may have been a recent shift to the Liberals though Ukrainians are more conservative than are most Torontonians. Historically they were strongly conservative though.

    Replies: @sher singh

  290. @Mikel
    @Barbarossa


    the prospect of a bunch of Sikhs taking over and keeping me from eating beef ranks about on par with Martian invasion on the list of things I’m realistically concerned about.
     
    If the Martians are peaceful I think I'd rate the beef abolitionists as a bigger threat to human well-being.

    To my knowledge, Sher Singh has never explained what's wrong with eating beef anyway. He should just try a properly aged rib-steak and he'd forget all those archaic myths.

    Replies: @Sher Singh, @sudden death, @Barbarossa

    I respect the reasons for not eating beef, even if I don’t subscribe. The cow is giver of milk and is therefore a mother figure, providing countless calories over her lifetime. Also, for Hindu’s, there are a variety of theological reasons for the sacred place of the cow.

    There also seem to be a variety of opinions within Sikhism on eating meat in general or beef in particular. I’m no expert, so can’t adjudicate, but it seems to come in from Hindu influence.

    https://sikhheritageeducation.com/meat-eating-is-it-permissible-for-sikhs/

    I live in a place with long winters and can’t be feeding hay to plethora of useless bulls anyhow. I respect my milk cow and she deserves a good retirement when no longer able to produce milk.

    • Agree: Sher Singh
    • Replies: @Sher Singh
    @Barbarossa


    I respect the reasons for not eating beef, even if I don’t subscribe. The cow is giver of milk and is therefore a mother figure,
     

    I respect my milk cow and she deserves a good retirement when no longer able to produce milk
     
    You're basically following the Vedic rules anyway. When we say eating beef we mean the Milch Cow.
    Bull sacrifice was always part of Vedic rituals, we just have Buffalo now. We're on the same page,

    The Vedas say those who harm the Milch cow must be cut down & burnt.
    This crime still carries the penalty of death in Pakistan,

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Au%C3%B0umbla

    https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1022467035822829588/1034915273477730384/IMG_20190309_163547.jpg

    https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1022467035822829588/1034915273716793424/Singh_GaoRakshak.png

    https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1022467035822829588/1034915274182373376/Sullah_Gao_Hatiya.jpeg

    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ

    Replies: @AP

    , @Mikel
    @Barbarossa


    I respect my milk cow and she deserves a good retirement when no longer able to produce milk.
     
    Fair enough but if I was in your place, I would age its meat and freeze it for many weekend and special occasion meals.

    Now that mature oxen are difficult to find, fine restaurateurs use old cow as a substitute. You can pay hundreds of dollars/euros for a good old cow steak in Europe. Or thousands, if we're talking about carefully selected and aged oxen and local specialty cows.

    This stuff melts in your mouth.

    https://cdn.cookmonkeys.es/recetas/medium/chuleton-de-buey-9892.jpg

    Replies: @Barbarossa

  291. @YetAnotherAnon
    @LatW

    I would not say that Ukraine is on the German doorstep. Poland might have something to say.

    "how willingly Germany has stepped up to the leadership role in the future reconstruction program"

    As any future reconstruction program will probably need Russian assent, it's a pretty safe bet to volunteer for the rebuild.

    "It might be that they’re seeing long term opportunities there."

    It'll need to be a YUGE opportunity to compensate for the loss of Russian gas. And they've dumped their nuke power.

    No, the US Ukraine policy has inflicted a near-mortal blow on the mighty German economy. Third time in 104 years, but at least they declared their emnity the last two times.

    Replies: @LatW

    I would not say that Ukraine is on the German doorstep.

    That’s not how they think in Europe these days (not that they didn’t think that way in the 1940s either, surely they felt bold enough to walk into Ukraine back then). Not at the EU institutional level at least. The population, too, agrees at least partly. And it’s too close and too big.

    Poland might have something to say.

    Poland has done a lot – Poland has taken in a million refugees and has upgraded her military, Poland is no slacker. Poland could win out of this (if the war doesn’t spread).

    As any future reconstruction program will probably need Russian assent, it’s a pretty safe bet to volunteer for the rebuild.

    Yes, but I wasn’t thinking so much of the security angle, but that they stepped up so quickly to take up a leading position where this most likely will impose financial obligations on them (given the current recessionary environment and the energy problems they are dealing with). Obviously, they’re thinking decades ahead (as they always do), but still, I wasn’t expecting they would volunteer so quickly. I was expecting that they would need to be encouraged more. There must be something to it.

    [MORE]

    It’ll need to be a YUGE opportunity to compensate for the loss of Russian gas. And they’ve dumped their nuke power.

    Well, if they have consigned themselves to not using Russian gas for the foreseeable future, then they might be looking for other opportunities. They shouldn’t push out EEs in the process, it should be done as a common effort. This should be a Kyiv centric endeavor.

    Btw, the war is, of course, a huge drag on the economy of global proportions, however, please, do take the general economic situation into account. The slowdown and the inflation problems had already started before. The tech bubble burst in the US just this year. And what was happening in the US housing and stocks was just insane – it was bound to reverse. The situation in Europe is tougher, ofc. But again – housing in Europe (and the general cost of living issue) was going up already before the Russian invasion in Ukraine.

  292. Sher Singh says:
    @Barbarossa
    @Mikel

    I respect the reasons for not eating beef, even if I don't subscribe. The cow is giver of milk and is therefore a mother figure, providing countless calories over her lifetime. Also, for Hindu's, there are a variety of theological reasons for the sacred place of the cow.

    There also seem to be a variety of opinions within Sikhism on eating meat in general or beef in particular. I'm no expert, so can't adjudicate, but it seems to come in from Hindu influence.

    https://sikhheritageeducation.com/meat-eating-is-it-permissible-for-sikhs/

    I live in a place with long winters and can't be feeding hay to plethora of useless bulls anyhow. I respect my milk cow and she deserves a good retirement when no longer able to produce milk.

    Replies: @Sher Singh, @Mikel

    I respect the reasons for not eating beef, even if I don’t subscribe. The cow is giver of milk and is therefore a mother figure,

    I respect my milk cow and she deserves a good retirement when no longer able to produce milk

    You’re basically following the Vedic rules anyway. When we say eating beef we mean the Milch Cow.
    Bull sacrifice was always part of Vedic rituals, we just have Buffalo now. We’re on the same page,

    The Vedas say those who harm the Milch cow must be cut down & burnt.
    This crime still carries the penalty of death in Pakistan,

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Au%C3%B0umbla

    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ

    • Replies: @AP
    @Sher Singh


    You’re basically following the Vedic rules anyway. When we say eating beef we mean the Milch Cow
     
    Good steak doesn’t come from milk cows, they should not be used for that purpose.
  293. Several weeks back the United States advised it’s citizens to leave Russia. Now both Russia and Ukraine are accusing each other of planning a dirty bomb false flag event. And, since a few days ago, the US has deployed elements of the 101st Airborne to Romania.

    The U.S. Army’s 101st Airborne is practicing for war with Russia just miles from Ukraine’s border

    Mihail Kogălniceanu, Romania — The U.S. Army’s 101st Airborne Division has been deployed to Europe for the first time in almost 80 years amid soaring tension between Russia and the American-led NATO military alliance. The light infantry unit, nicknamed the “Screaming Eagles,” is trained to deploy on any battlefield in the world within hours, ready to fight.

    CBS News joined the division’s Deputy Commander, Brigadier General John Lubas, and Colonel Edwin Matthaidess, Commander of the 2nd Brigade Combat Team, on a Black Hawk helicopter for the hour-long ride to the very edge of NATO territory — only around three miles from Romania’s border with Ukraine.

    The real meaning for me, to have the American troops here, is like if you were to have allies in Normandy before any enemy was there,” Romanian Major General Lulian Berdila told CBS News, referring to the landmark World War II battle on France’s north coast. The American forces have been establishing a garrison at the Romanian military’s air base.

    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ukraine-news-russia-us-army-101st-airborne-nato-war-games-romania/

    [MORE]

    A photo essay of the Romanian Major General Lulian Berdila, Chief of Staff of Romania’s land forces, and his recent Oct 14 visit to the United States. Berdila has received extensive US military training, and it appears he may have personally accompanied the 101st Airborne on it’s deployment from the United States to Romania.

    https://www.theleafchronicle.com/picture-gallery/news/2022/10/15/major-general-berdila-visit/10500454002/

    More info on Berdila’s recent US visit.

    https://www.army.mil/article/261139/romanian_senior_leader_visits_victory_corps_honors_troops

  294. Look, it’s all love here – this is the quality of poster that gets mod on the Karlin server.
    Fair warning, you will never forget what’s under more for the rest of your days.

    Post is a Anglo-Egyptian Copt

    [MORE]

    • Replies: @Barbarossa
    @Sher Singh

    That's wrong on so many levels that I don't even know where one would start...

    I mean, what was that apropos of?! Or was that just thrown out there for general edification?

    I guess the poster won the grand prize of being maximally retarded, gross, and creepy in a bare minimum of characters.

    Replies: @sudden death, @sher singh

  295. @Matra
    @AP


    There are a few prominent ethnic Ukrainian Liberal politicians from Ontario but the people tend to vote Conservative there
     
    Even if true, I'm not so sure about the numbers, it was only after it became a multiculti party. Back when it mattered and there was still a chance of preserving the nation the Ukrainians of Ontario along with pretty much all the non-Germanic ethnic Europeans voted Liberal. Since about 2006 even Jews - the most anti-national, anti-Christian demographic to ever exist - vote Conservative because they know it is really just the old Liberal Party their parents and grandparents grew up with. (If it became populist, anti-immigration - it won't! - the Jews would do what US neocons did after Trump and return to their original party). Voting Conservative means nothing in Canada, at least not at the federal level. But it wouldn't surprise me if future Ukrainian citizens (hundreds of thousands are arriving) vote for them in significant numbers as there are no differences on Ukraine policy between the Conservatives & Liberals and also because there is no longer a rival Anglo identity attached to the CP.

    Replies: @AP

    Back when it mattered and there was still a chance of preserving the nation the Ukrainians of Ontario along with pretty much all the non-Germanic ethnic Europeans voted Liberal. Since about 2006…

    A Ukrainian, Michael Starr (Starchewsky) briefly led the Canadian Progressive Conservative party in the late 1960s. His parents emigrated from Galicia to Ontario.

    John Yaremko was in he longest serving provinces cabinet minister. He was a Conservative in Ontario, served from 1951-1975.

    Ukrainians in Canada were mostly voting Conservative through the 80s and 90s. It was an anti-Communist thing. IIRC Mulroney was the first western leader to recognize Ukraine’s independence.

    The Conservative premier of Ontario from 2002-2003 was a Ukrainian.

    But it wouldn’t surprise me if future Ukrainian citizens (hundreds of thousands are arriving) vote for them in significant numbers as there are no differences on Ukraine policy between the Conservatives & Liberals and also because there is no longer a rival Anglo identity attached to the CP.

    The candidate for the new populist Canadian party in Canada for Etobicoke was a Ukrainian. But the riding was won by an ethnic Ukrainian of the Liberal Party. In Ontario there may have been a recent shift to the Liberals though Ukrainians are more conservative than are most Torontonians. Historically they were strongly conservative though.

    • Replies: @sher singh
    @AP


    Ukrainians are more conservative than are most Torontonians. Historically they were strongly conservative though.
     
    Ukranians are Liberal vs Brown/Med people but Cons vs everyone else esp UofT types.
    Mulroney & Harper both pioneered the current mass migration program.

    Mulroney made it a fixed quota rather than one based on economic need.
    Harper basically opened up all the schools & low end labour to international visa holders.

    Mulroney brought in gun licenses & Harper got more immigrant votes than Libs in 2011.
    Canadian parties are ideologically centrist - have to be given the neighbourhood.
    The PPC is a meme & Etobicoke is 3 Ridings - North, Centre, South - Sikh, Slav, Scot.

    Ethnic minorities just play ball with the local strongman.
    Urban/ON/Catholic = Lib
    Rural/Alberta/Prot = Conservative
    Native/Black = NDP

    Canadians are pretty tight knit - easy to forget till crisis hits.
    Nobody has a problem with 6million Ukr refugees let alone 6 lakh.
    Nobody thinks they'll form rape gangs or any of that bs - so just chill.

    The current Deputy Leader of the Federal Cons is a Sikh btw.
    The President of the Ontario Cons is a shaven Sikh.
    Leader of NDP (socialist) is a Sikh too.

    See what I mean?

  296. @Sher Singh
    @Barbarossa


    I respect the reasons for not eating beef, even if I don’t subscribe. The cow is giver of milk and is therefore a mother figure,
     

    I respect my milk cow and she deserves a good retirement when no longer able to produce milk
     
    You're basically following the Vedic rules anyway. When we say eating beef we mean the Milch Cow.
    Bull sacrifice was always part of Vedic rituals, we just have Buffalo now. We're on the same page,

    The Vedas say those who harm the Milch cow must be cut down & burnt.
    This crime still carries the penalty of death in Pakistan,

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Au%C3%B0umbla

    https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1022467035822829588/1034915273477730384/IMG_20190309_163547.jpg

    https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1022467035822829588/1034915273716793424/Singh_GaoRakshak.png

    https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1022467035822829588/1034915274182373376/Sullah_Gao_Hatiya.jpeg

    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ

    Replies: @AP

    You’re basically following the Vedic rules anyway. When we say eating beef we mean the Milch Cow

    Good steak doesn’t come from milk cows, they should not be used for that purpose.

  297. sher singh says:
    @sudden death
    @Mikel


    To my knowledge, Sher Singh has never explained what’s wrong with eating beef anyway. He should just try a properly aged rib-steak and he’d forget all those archaic myths.
     
    Just a guess, but those types of eating taboos probably had some slight rational background which was forgotten eons ago since they were instituted, like some epidemic or poisoning, e.g. probable ancient local spikes of mad cow disesases, when communities were affected and had human victims on noticable scale.

    The same with Arab pork or alcohol ban, e.g. ancient tribes there quite likely were enough hot-headed even when sober, so wine consumption probably had absolutely devastating violent effect on inner social order when consumption began, so some sort of religious reasons had to be invented to deal with it.

    Replies: @sher singh, @songbird

    The same with Arab pork or alcohol ban, e.g. ancient tribes there quite likely were enough hot-headed even when sober, so wine consumption probably had absolutely devastating violent effect on inner social order when consumption began, so some sort of religious reasons had to be invented to deal with it.

    The Arabic wine one is simple – it’s allowed in heaven, but denied on Earth.
    Understand religion as a war-making cohesion building tool.

    Wine is de facto allowed in the palace too for that matter – many a Sultan slept with bottle under bed.
    Religion isn’t about rational problem-solving it’s a street gang to take women.

    Christianity differs in this aspect, but :shrug: Europeans solve this by just not being that Christian.

  298. @Sher Singh
    Look, it's all love here - this is the quality of poster that gets mod on the Karlin server.
    Fair warning, you will never forget what's under more for the rest of your days.

    Post is a Anglo-Egyptian Copt




    https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1022467035822829588/1034919168904015942/SPOILER_unknown.png

    Replies: @Barbarossa

    That’s wrong on so many levels that I don’t even know where one would start…

    I mean, what was that apropos of?! Or was that just thrown out there for general edification?

    I guess the poster won the grand prize of being maximally retarded, gross, and creepy in a bare minimum of characters.

    • Replies: @sudden death
    @Barbarossa

    However there is obscure, but certain trait of some observational empirical scientific method in this madness, despite disturbing potential bisexual forced incest undertones - maybe someday we will hear about some promising IgNobel prize winner with a future study about individual biological human genital microflora influences regarding strenght of emanated bodily odours, lol

    , @sher singh
    @Barbarossa

    Question only the bottom of the Lake can answer.

    2 Questions 1. Smoke/Use Tobacco? 2. Thoughts on Sailing Great Lakes?

    Replies: @Barbarossa

  299. @Barbarossa
    @Mikel

    I respect the reasons for not eating beef, even if I don't subscribe. The cow is giver of milk and is therefore a mother figure, providing countless calories over her lifetime. Also, for Hindu's, there are a variety of theological reasons for the sacred place of the cow.

    There also seem to be a variety of opinions within Sikhism on eating meat in general or beef in particular. I'm no expert, so can't adjudicate, but it seems to come in from Hindu influence.

    https://sikhheritageeducation.com/meat-eating-is-it-permissible-for-sikhs/

    I live in a place with long winters and can't be feeding hay to plethora of useless bulls anyhow. I respect my milk cow and she deserves a good retirement when no longer able to produce milk.

    Replies: @Sher Singh, @Mikel

    I respect my milk cow and she deserves a good retirement when no longer able to produce milk.

    Fair enough but if I was in your place, I would age its meat and freeze it for many weekend and special occasion meals.

    Now that mature oxen are difficult to find, fine restaurateurs use old cow as a substitute. You can pay hundreds of dollars/euros for a good old cow steak in Europe. Or thousands, if we’re talking about carefully selected and aged oxen and local specialty cows.

    This stuff melts in your mouth.

    • Replies: @Barbarossa
    @Mikel

    I don't take it as necessarily the religious point that Sher Singh does, but the retirement for my milk cow seems to me a matter of reciprocity and responsibility. If the cow gives her milk and her bull calves for my nourishment, then it entails certain responsibilities from me. One of these is to feed and care for her obviously but it also seems deeply ungrateful to me to eat her once she has passed a certain productivity. It's certainly not the most efficient way of doing things, but I suppose most of the things that make the world a good place are inefficient.


    fine restaurateurs use old cow as a substitute.
     
    I've noticed the same trend here where dairy beef has gone from low-grade to high-end from certain people. I've haven't tried it myself so I can't compare.
    The current steer in the freezer was on milk and grass for 18+ months and that made some incredible tender and marbled meat. I have another up and coming currently raised the same way.
    But to your point on older animals, I actually have found that I prefer the mutton from my Icelandics to the lamb. I think the flavor is better.

    Replies: @Barbarossa

  300. sher singh says:
    @AP
    @Matra


    Back when it mattered and there was still a chance of preserving the nation the Ukrainians of Ontario along with pretty much all the non-Germanic ethnic Europeans voted Liberal. Since about 2006…
     
    A Ukrainian, Michael Starr (Starchewsky) briefly led the Canadian Progressive Conservative party in the late 1960s. His parents emigrated from Galicia to Ontario.

    John Yaremko was in he longest serving provinces cabinet minister. He was a Conservative in Ontario, served from 1951-1975.

    Ukrainians in Canada were mostly voting Conservative through the 80s and 90s. It was an anti-Communist thing. IIRC Mulroney was the first western leader to recognize Ukraine’s independence.

    The Conservative premier of Ontario from 2002-2003 was a Ukrainian.


    But it wouldn’t surprise me if future Ukrainian citizens (hundreds of thousands are arriving) vote for them in significant numbers as there are no differences on Ukraine policy between the Conservatives & Liberals and also because there is no longer a rival Anglo identity attached to the CP.
     
    The candidate for the new populist Canadian party in Canada for Etobicoke was a Ukrainian. But the riding was won by an ethnic Ukrainian of the Liberal Party. In Ontario there may have been a recent shift to the Liberals though Ukrainians are more conservative than are most Torontonians. Historically they were strongly conservative though.

    Replies: @sher singh

    Ukrainians are more conservative than are most Torontonians. Historically they were strongly conservative though.

    Ukranians are Liberal vs Brown/Med people but Cons vs everyone else esp UofT types.
    Mulroney & Harper both pioneered the current mass migration program.

    Mulroney made it a fixed quota rather than one based on economic need.
    Harper basically opened up all the schools & low end labour to international visa holders.

    Mulroney brought in gun licenses & Harper got more immigrant votes than Libs in 2011.
    Canadian parties are ideologically centrist – have to be given the neighbourhood.
    The PPC is a meme & Etobicoke is 3 Ridings – North, Centre, South – Sikh, Slav, Scot.

    Ethnic minorities just play ball with the local strongman.
    Urban/ON/Catholic = Lib
    Rural/Alberta/Prot = Conservative
    Native/Black = NDP

    Canadians are pretty tight knit – easy to forget till crisis hits.
    Nobody has a problem with 6million Ukr refugees let alone 6 lakh.
    Nobody thinks they’ll form rape gangs or any of that bs – so just chill.

    The current Deputy Leader of the Federal Cons is a Sikh btw.
    The President of the Ontario Cons is a shaven Sikh.
    Leader of NDP (socialist) is a Sikh too.

    See what I mean?

    • Thanks: AP
  301. @Sher Singh
    @Mikel

    Both dog & beef eating are UnAryan. You can find reasons why they're bad.


    I understand that it's become a culture war issue between White untouchables & Libs.
    It's not really our problem, men with Weapons don't explain themselves.

    The Guru has ordered an end to cow slaughter.

    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ

    Replies: @Mikel

    Both dog & beef eating are UnAryan.

    That’s like putting rotten acorns and almonds in the same food category. You don’t know what you’re talking about. As I said, just try some top quality steak and then you’ll be able to come back and discuss culinary matters.

    • Replies: @Mikhail
    @Mikel

    https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/raw-egg-nationalist-jml-077/id1441895691?i=1000541536358

    , @Sean
    @Mikel

    "Previous analyses of ancient DNA have shown the Yamnaya lacked the genetic ability to metabolize milk sugars—in other words, they were lactose intolerant."


    Yamnaya people drank horse milk (Wilkin et al. 2021) https://eurogenes.blogspot.com › 2021/09 › yamnaya-p...
    15 Sept 2021 — Dairying enabled Early Bronze Age Yamnaya steppe expansions. ... It resembled kefir or ayran.
     

    Replies: @songbird

    , @sher singh
    @Mikel

    https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1019045310217060372/1034658715145621544/Capture_2018-08-26-23-26-132.png

    Replies: @Mikel

  302. @Mikel
    @Sher Singh


    Both dog & beef eating are UnAryan.
     
    That's like putting rotten acorns and almonds in the same food category. You don't know what you're talking about. As I said, just try some top quality steak and then you'll be able to come back and discuss culinary matters.

    Replies: @Mikhail, @Sean, @sher singh

  303. @sudden death
    @Mikel


    To my knowledge, Sher Singh has never explained what’s wrong with eating beef anyway. He should just try a properly aged rib-steak and he’d forget all those archaic myths.
     
    Just a guess, but those types of eating taboos probably had some slight rational background which was forgotten eons ago since they were instituted, like some epidemic or poisoning, e.g. probable ancient local spikes of mad cow disesases, when communities were affected and had human victims on noticable scale.

    The same with Arab pork or alcohol ban, e.g. ancient tribes there quite likely were enough hot-headed even when sober, so wine consumption probably had absolutely devastating violent effect on inner social order when consumption began, so some sort of religious reasons had to be invented to deal with it.

    Replies: @sher singh, @songbird

    Mad cow is extremely rare and has a long incubation period in humans. If it existed at all in the past (doubtful, probably a result of industrial farms, where they feed cow parts to cows), they wouldn’t have had the epidemiological methods or sense to isolate it and make the connection, especially in the background of general death.

    I don’t believe in these theories about trichomoniasis, etc. There is a reason for dietary strictures – namely it massively aids group cohesiveness to keep out foreigners from every meal. Of course, it is very un-PC to acknowledge this, and much more PC to posit that Semites had some special knowledge of sanitation, and it was all in the service of health.

    • Replies: @sudden death
    @songbird


    massively aids group cohesiveness to keep out foreigners from every meal
     
    It would make sense if those foreigners would have an ethnic/religious tradition of eating only/mainly just the pork, but were there ever such kind of foreigners?

    Replies: @songbird

  304. @Barbarossa
    @Sher Singh

    That's wrong on so many levels that I don't even know where one would start...

    I mean, what was that apropos of?! Or was that just thrown out there for general edification?

    I guess the poster won the grand prize of being maximally retarded, gross, and creepy in a bare minimum of characters.

    Replies: @sudden death, @sher singh

    However there is obscure, but certain trait of some observational empirical scientific method in this madness, despite disturbing potential bisexual forced incest undertones – maybe someday we will hear about some promising IgNobel prize winner with a future study about individual biological human genital microflora influences regarding strenght of emanated bodily odours, lol

    • LOL: Barbarossa
  305. @songbird
    @sudden death

    Mad cow is extremely rare and has a long incubation period in humans. If it existed at all in the past (doubtful, probably a result of industrial farms, where they feed cow parts to cows), they wouldn't have had the epidemiological methods or sense to isolate it and make the connection, especially in the background of general death.

    I don't believe in these theories about trichomoniasis, etc. There is a reason for dietary strictures - namely it massively aids group cohesiveness to keep out foreigners from every meal. Of course, it is very un-PC to acknowledge this, and much more PC to posit that Semites had some special knowledge of sanitation, and it was all in the service of health.

    Replies: @sudden death

    massively aids group cohesiveness to keep out foreigners from every meal

    It would make sense if those foreigners would have an ethnic/religious tradition of eating only/mainly just the pork, but were there ever such kind of foreigners?

    • Replies: @songbird
    @sudden death

    In Sikhism, meals in the past were communal affairs. They made a religious-egalitarian point of eating together, in a large group, as is evidenced by the writings of the gurus.

    Meanwhile modern genetics has proved how different Hindu castes (that have different food taboos) are.

    What was the early history of Jews among other groups in the Middle East? Did they also live among non-pork eaters, and was it a general taboo? It's possible but remember most Jews today are Ashkenazi. They lived among Europeans who ate pork, and IMO, it helps explain why such a small group became so many. Another small reason: probably adaptive to have your butchers all be in the same community, to keep the money in the community too.

    But a pork ban is a great way of getting rid of apostates because pork is hard to resist. Reform Jews (who often eat pork) seem like they are dying out. Not so the Orthodox.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Dmitry, @YetAnotherAnon

  306. @Mikel
    @Sher Singh


    Both dog & beef eating are UnAryan.
     
    That's like putting rotten acorns and almonds in the same food category. You don't know what you're talking about. As I said, just try some top quality steak and then you'll be able to come back and discuss culinary matters.

    Replies: @Mikhail, @Sean, @sher singh

    “Previous analyses of ancient DNA have shown the Yamnaya lacked the genetic ability to metabolize milk sugars—in other words, they were lactose intolerant.”

    Yamnaya people drank horse milk (Wilkin et al. 2021) https://eurogenes.blogspot.com › 2021/09 › yamnaya-p…
    15 Sept 2021 — Dairying enabled Early Bronze Age Yamnaya steppe expansions. … It resembled kefir or ayran.

    • Replies: @songbird
    @Sean

    I've wondered whether they developed intestinal cultures that mitigated lactose intolerance. Maybe, bacteria fill the gap before digestive system changes have time to evolve.

    Or maybe they evolved some generalist adaptations against diarrhea that preceded and facilitated lactose tolerance.

  307. @Mikel
    @Sher Singh


    Both dog & beef eating are UnAryan.
     
    That's like putting rotten acorns and almonds in the same food category. You don't know what you're talking about. As I said, just try some top quality steak and then you'll be able to come back and discuss culinary matters.

    Replies: @Mikhail, @Sean, @sher singh

    • Replies: @Mikel
    @sher singh

    We are also willing to defend our culinary traditions by any means necessary.

    https://www.contactococina.com/media/wysiwyg/Contacto_Cocina_-_destacada_chuleton_vaca_vieja.png

    Replies: @sher singh

  308. @sudden death
    @songbird


    massively aids group cohesiveness to keep out foreigners from every meal
     
    It would make sense if those foreigners would have an ethnic/religious tradition of eating only/mainly just the pork, but were there ever such kind of foreigners?

    Replies: @songbird

    In Sikhism, meals in the past were communal affairs. They made a religious-egalitarian point of eating together, in a large group, as is evidenced by the writings of the gurus.

    Meanwhile modern genetics has proved how different Hindu castes (that have different food taboos) are.

    What was the early history of Jews among other groups in the Middle East? Did they also live among non-pork eaters, and was it a general taboo? It’s possible but remember most Jews today are Ashkenazi. They lived among Europeans who ate pork, and IMO, it helps explain why such a small group became so many. Another small reason: probably adaptive to have your butchers all be in the same community, to keep the money in the community too.

    But a pork ban is a great way of getting rid of apostates because pork is hard to resist. Reform Jews (who often eat pork) seem like they are dying out. Not so the Orthodox.

    • Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
    @songbird

    A Catholic priest told me that in communities with a starvation problem it was considered extremely rude to the poorest members to keep pigs. They do not eat grass. They eat what is nutritious for humans in theory. The priest claimed this was the genesis of the pork eating taboo.

    Tom Harrisson, in Living Among the Cannibals, wrote that human meat tastes like pork.

    https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1288353.Living_Among_Cannibals

    Eugene McCarthy argues that humans are a chimpanzee-pig hybrid.

    http://www.macroevolution.net/human-origins.html

    Replies: @sher singh, @Wokechoke, @songbird

    , @Dmitry
    @songbird


    pork ban is a great way
     
    Historically Jews were much more like cults, or at least not like a nationality (at least from sometime of destruction of the Second Temple until the 20th century).

    I'm not an expert about cults. But it looks it is necessary to have rules which distinguish from the people who are inside the cult, from people who are outside the cult, just like Mormons have to ban very American drinks of coffee and tea.

    Unlike in a nationality, being in the cult is not a passive identity, but requires active following of rules which separate you against people outside the cult. Until the 19th century or later in some places, if Jews were not actively following the religious rules, they would have to exit the cult and not be Jews. A concept of "secular Jews" was not existing, would be viewed as a contradiction. Either you follow the rule or you are exiting.

    Banning of pork is course one of the less complicated rules for Jewish food observances, as there are much more complicated rules (like separate kitchens for meat and dairy).

    If you read in the ex-Mormon forums, some Mormons there are writing they feel instinctively fear of coffee, even years after they exit the cult. There is a thread where they are talking about how they feel a nervous tension when they drink coffee.

    Bacon and shellfish is a fashionable food in Israel with the secular population. One of the most fashionable chains for restaurants, is giving different kinds of bacon all day, which is not exactly a luxury food in most countries (https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2019-02-19/ty-article/.premium/why-israel-is-experiencing-a-bacon-crisis). It's not because it is a special food, it's because they still feel the nervous tension and hype around it. It's like the ex-Mormons have a country, cafes would probably be very fashionable.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    , @YetAnotherAnon
    @songbird

    "a pork ban is a great way of getting rid of apostates because pork is hard to resist"

    Absolutely. There's an old Jewish joke about a priest and a rabbi agreeing to sample the forbidden things allowed in the other religion, where the punchline delivered by the rabbi is "It's better than pork, isn't it?".

    But is it better than a crispy bacon roll with butter and a mug of tea? On a Saturday morning when you feel a trifle fragile after Friday night?


    (surely the pork taboo origin is simple - they eat human faeces. Many an Indian squatting in a field has been rudely barged over by a hungry pig.)

    Replies: @songbird

  309. @Barbarossa
    @Sher Singh

    That's wrong on so many levels that I don't even know where one would start...

    I mean, what was that apropos of?! Or was that just thrown out there for general edification?

    I guess the poster won the grand prize of being maximally retarded, gross, and creepy in a bare minimum of characters.

    Replies: @sudden death, @sher singh

    Question only the bottom of the Lake can answer.

    2 Questions 1. Smoke/Use Tobacco? 2. Thoughts on Sailing Great Lakes?

    • Replies: @Barbarossa
    @sher singh

    I've never smoked. Cigarettes seem unspeakably nasty to me, though pipe tobacco seems quite appealing. I have some serious nostalgia around pipe smoke from a particular person who is gone now. I wouldn't mind taking up a pipe at some point when I'm older, but haven't taken the time to try it.

    I've never tried sailing the Great Lakes. I assume you are talking about in a sailboat, not a motor boat? I have an uncle who has been an avid sailor and has a sailboat at his place in Maine. It's very appealing and I have the notion that if I had a different life I might live by the ocean in an out of the way spot and spend inordinate amounts of time sailing, fishing, and eating seafood.

    Ever sailed the Great Lakes yourself?

    Replies: @sher singh

  310. @Sean
    @Mikel

    "Previous analyses of ancient DNA have shown the Yamnaya lacked the genetic ability to metabolize milk sugars—in other words, they were lactose intolerant."


    Yamnaya people drank horse milk (Wilkin et al. 2021) https://eurogenes.blogspot.com › 2021/09 › yamnaya-p...
    15 Sept 2021 — Dairying enabled Early Bronze Age Yamnaya steppe expansions. ... It resembled kefir or ayran.
     

    Replies: @songbird

    I’ve wondered whether they developed intestinal cultures that mitigated lactose intolerance. Maybe, bacteria fill the gap before digestive system changes have time to evolve.

    Or maybe they evolved some generalist adaptations against diarrhea that preceded and facilitated lactose tolerance.

  311. @sher singh
    @Mikel

    https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1019045310217060372/1034658715145621544/Capture_2018-08-26-23-26-132.png

    Replies: @Mikel

    We are also willing to defend our culinary traditions by any means necessary.

    • Thanks: LatW
    • Replies: @sher singh
    @Mikel

    You're Basque you ain't defending shit but clicks & squeaks in an Indo-Euro Europe.

  312. @songbird
    @sudden death

    In Sikhism, meals in the past were communal affairs. They made a religious-egalitarian point of eating together, in a large group, as is evidenced by the writings of the gurus.

    Meanwhile modern genetics has proved how different Hindu castes (that have different food taboos) are.

    What was the early history of Jews among other groups in the Middle East? Did they also live among non-pork eaters, and was it a general taboo? It's possible but remember most Jews today are Ashkenazi. They lived among Europeans who ate pork, and IMO, it helps explain why such a small group became so many. Another small reason: probably adaptive to have your butchers all be in the same community, to keep the money in the community too.

    But a pork ban is a great way of getting rid of apostates because pork is hard to resist. Reform Jews (who often eat pork) seem like they are dying out. Not so the Orthodox.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Dmitry, @YetAnotherAnon

    A Catholic priest told me that in communities with a starvation problem it was considered extremely rude to the poorest members to keep pigs. They do not eat grass. They eat what is nutritious for humans in theory. The priest claimed this was the genesis of the pork eating taboo.

    Tom Harrisson, in Living Among the Cannibals, wrote that human meat tastes like pork.

    https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1288353.Living_Among_Cannibals

    Eugene McCarthy argues that humans are a chimpanzee-pig hybrid.

    http://www.macroevolution.net/human-origins.html

    • Replies: @sher singh
    @Emil Nikola Richard


    Eugene McCarthy argues that humans are a chimpanzee-pig hybrid.

    http://www.macroevolution.net/human-origins.html
     
    , @Wokechoke
    @Emil Nikola Richard

    Pigs can eat through dead humans. Never trust a pig farmer. Also yes Pigs taste like humans. Sans the aroma of piss and shit and rotting flesh, a battle fields with incendiaries thrown around smell like a pork holocaust.


    I think the Jews also latched onto eating no pork for a simple reason. The Greeks enjoyed it as a meal. To define themselves from the Greek overlords the Jews clung to this dietary restriction as a marker of national identity.


    The Diadochi Selucids taunted the Jews with pork feasts.

    Replies: @silviosilver

    , @songbird
    @Emil Nikola Richard

    There are some rumors that Scottish Highlanders had a pork taboo:
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scottish_pork_taboo

    Pig toilets may have had something to do with the origin of the Jewish taboo. Still in use in some places:
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pig_toilet

  313. @Mikel
    @sher singh

    We are also willing to defend our culinary traditions by any means necessary.

    https://www.contactococina.com/media/wysiwyg/Contacto_Cocina_-_destacada_chuleton_vaca_vieja.png

    Replies: @sher singh

    You’re Basque you ain’t defending shit but clicks & squeaks in an Indo-Euro Europe.

  314. @Emil Nikola Richard
    @songbird

    A Catholic priest told me that in communities with a starvation problem it was considered extremely rude to the poorest members to keep pigs. They do not eat grass. They eat what is nutritious for humans in theory. The priest claimed this was the genesis of the pork eating taboo.

    Tom Harrisson, in Living Among the Cannibals, wrote that human meat tastes like pork.

    https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1288353.Living_Among_Cannibals

    Eugene McCarthy argues that humans are a chimpanzee-pig hybrid.

    http://www.macroevolution.net/human-origins.html

    Replies: @sher singh, @Wokechoke, @songbird

    Eugene McCarthy argues that humans are a chimpanzee-pig hybrid.

    http://www.macroevolution.net/human-origins.html

  315. @sher singh
    @Barbarossa

    Question only the bottom of the Lake can answer.

    2 Questions 1. Smoke/Use Tobacco? 2. Thoughts on Sailing Great Lakes?

    Replies: @Barbarossa

    I’ve never smoked. Cigarettes seem unspeakably nasty to me, though pipe tobacco seems quite appealing. I have some serious nostalgia around pipe smoke from a particular person who is gone now. I wouldn’t mind taking up a pipe at some point when I’m older, but haven’t taken the time to try it.

    I’ve never tried sailing the Great Lakes. I assume you are talking about in a sailboat, not a motor boat? I have an uncle who has been an avid sailor and has a sailboat at his place in Maine. It’s very appealing and I have the notion that if I had a different life I might live by the ocean in an out of the way spot and spend inordinate amounts of time sailing, fishing, and eating seafood.

    Ever sailed the Great Lakes yourself?

    • Replies: @sher singh
    @Barbarossa

    Tobacco/smoking is prohibited & we don't associate with users.

    Sailing/boating w/e we live near 5 inland seas, and people rarely see them all.
    Imagine if there was no border, and you could just hop across the lake to do stuff..

    The Ontario peninsula is a cool place tbh especially the thunderstorms.

    Replies: @Barbarossa

  316. @Mikel
    @Barbarossa


    I respect my milk cow and she deserves a good retirement when no longer able to produce milk.
     
    Fair enough but if I was in your place, I would age its meat and freeze it for many weekend and special occasion meals.

    Now that mature oxen are difficult to find, fine restaurateurs use old cow as a substitute. You can pay hundreds of dollars/euros for a good old cow steak in Europe. Or thousands, if we're talking about carefully selected and aged oxen and local specialty cows.

    This stuff melts in your mouth.

    https://cdn.cookmonkeys.es/recetas/medium/chuleton-de-buey-9892.jpg

    Replies: @Barbarossa

    I don’t take it as necessarily the religious point that Sher Singh does, but the retirement for my milk cow seems to me a matter of reciprocity and responsibility. If the cow gives her milk and her bull calves for my nourishment, then it entails certain responsibilities from me. One of these is to feed and care for her obviously but it also seems deeply ungrateful to me to eat her once she has passed a certain productivity. It’s certainly not the most efficient way of doing things, but I suppose most of the things that make the world a good place are inefficient.

    fine restaurateurs use old cow as a substitute.

    I’ve noticed the same trend here where dairy beef has gone from low-grade to high-end from certain people. I’ve haven’t tried it myself so I can’t compare.
    The current steer in the freezer was on milk and grass for 18+ months and that made some incredible tender and marbled meat. I have another up and coming currently raised the same way.
    But to your point on older animals, I actually have found that I prefer the mutton from my Icelandics to the lamb. I think the flavor is better.

    • Replies: @Barbarossa
    @Barbarossa

    The thought of having to kill and butcher my milk cow does seem like a deeply abhorrent act to me, so much so that perhaps it's not far off to label it a religious feeling.

    I'm sure this strikes many as absurd, but we live in an age where animals are regarded as mere protein production units to be exploited for maximum feed conversion with no attendant responsibilities from humans are imagined.

    In my mind, such a thing as providing me with meat or milk raises a whole host of responsibilities on my end that I must uphold. There is no free lunch after all and there really are no sinecures in life, only the accepting or evading of duty and responsibilities.

    Replies: @Mikel

  317. @Barbarossa
    @Mikel

    I don't take it as necessarily the religious point that Sher Singh does, but the retirement for my milk cow seems to me a matter of reciprocity and responsibility. If the cow gives her milk and her bull calves for my nourishment, then it entails certain responsibilities from me. One of these is to feed and care for her obviously but it also seems deeply ungrateful to me to eat her once she has passed a certain productivity. It's certainly not the most efficient way of doing things, but I suppose most of the things that make the world a good place are inefficient.


    fine restaurateurs use old cow as a substitute.
     
    I've noticed the same trend here where dairy beef has gone from low-grade to high-end from certain people. I've haven't tried it myself so I can't compare.
    The current steer in the freezer was on milk and grass for 18+ months and that made some incredible tender and marbled meat. I have another up and coming currently raised the same way.
    But to your point on older animals, I actually have found that I prefer the mutton from my Icelandics to the lamb. I think the flavor is better.

    Replies: @Barbarossa

    The thought of having to kill and butcher my milk cow does seem like a deeply abhorrent act to me, so much so that perhaps it’s not far off to label it a religious feeling.

    I’m sure this strikes many as absurd, but we live in an age where animals are regarded as mere protein production units to be exploited for maximum feed conversion with no attendant responsibilities from humans are imagined.

    In my mind, such a thing as providing me with meat or milk raises a whole host of responsibilities on my end that I must uphold. There is no free lunch after all and there really are no sinecures in life, only the accepting or evading of duty and responsibilities.

    • Thanks: Mikel
    • Replies: @Mikel
    @Barbarossa

    I actually sympathize with everything you're saying. I kill my own farm animals almost weekly (only rabbits right now) but I can't imagine not doing it in the most humane way possible. I have tasted aged old cow in the old country though and it's a different level of deep beef taste with amazing tenderness. I'm sure you could get something similar with your steers, there's quite a few videos on how to age beef on YT.

    Replies: @Barbarossa

  318. @A123
    @LatW



    Do you have any proof for this?
     
    It’s straight up obvious, in your face.
     
    It is obviously animated by someone with Christian leanings.

    This is 100% obvious. So obvious, it is in your face.


    Pigs are an unusual choice
     
    How would you like it if your people were portrayed as pigs?
     
    There is a huge back history of antisemitism tied to pig depictions. For example, the "Jew-Pig" found in Germany (1). The last thing they wasn't to do is encourage this sort of artistry.

    This is so obvious, it is in your face.



    we already knew how the Russian Jews who made this cartoon view all EE
     
    There is no reason to believe that Russians (Christian or Jewish) dislike EE Hungary. Belarus fits most definitions of EE. Does Serbia qualify as EE?
     
    I wasn’t talking about those countries. But if you want to continue to be blind, it’s your choice.
     
    You introduced the term EE. What specialized, non-standard meaning did you keep secret?

    The need to define terms that you are using should be clear. Indeed...

    This is so obvious, it is in your face.

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://www.timesofisrael.com/german-church-covers-anti-semitic-jew-pig-sculpture-it-was-forced-to-keep/

    Replies: @Dmitry

    It is pro-government telegram channels. A pro-government telegram channel they use to try to influence Israel has posted her cartoon. https://t.me/s/ukroterror2 Then it was viral with the informal social media/pro-government channels in Russia.

    They said it was from a far-right religious (I guess funded by American settler groups, with support for Trump) media which could have the same INN acronym in English, which reply to say they are not associated.
    https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/361603

    You can doubt a topic of Ukraine’s hopes for EU integration and need to be “rescued by” Russian government, would be interesting for media of far-right religious Zionist settlers sitting between olive trees in the Jordan Valley and conflict with Palestinian militants.

    • Replies: @A123
    @Dmitry

    Thanks. This is worth noting:


    The updated video also features a fake news logo for the INN channel, with Hebrew text reading “Israel Neged Nazi’im” (Israel Against Nazis) “The Telegram Channel.” It is unclear if the video’s logo was intended as a reference to Israel National News.
     
    The videos never had any connection to Israel or Judaism.

    The imagery was so overwhelmingly Christian background, I am surprised that anyone bit on it as Jewish created. However, as we all know, things go viral for very little reason.

    PEACE 😇
  319. @Barbarossa
    @Sher Singh

    In all honesty, the prospect of a bunch of Sikhs taking over and keeping me from eating beef ranks about on par with Martian invasion on the list of things I'm realistically concerned about. I'll be happy to raise the threat assessment once you guys have solidified control of the Indian subcontinent.

    Replies: @sher singh, @Mikel, @Thulean Friend

    I’ll be happy to raise the threat assessment once you guys have solidified control of the Indian subcontinent.

    The way things are going, I’d bet on Canada first. From their latest census:

    Sikhs comprised 1.7% of India’s population in the last Indian census (2011). The numbers for the newest Indian census aren’t out but the percentage has either stagnated or perhaps even dropped due to massive emigration.

    So Canada now has more Sikhs as a percentage of its population than India. Statistics Canada has more details:

    The diversity of the South Asian group can also be observed in the broad range of mother tongues reported in the 2021 Census, with English (36.4%), Punjabi (29.4%), Urdu (11.3%), Hindi (8.2%), Tamil (7.1%) and Gujarati (6.4%) the most commonly reported, alone or with other languages.

    Finally, the top three religions reported by South Asians are Hinduism (29.9%), Sikhism (29.6%) and Islam (23.1%).

    Sikhs comprise nearly 1/3rd of all South Asians in Canada but are less than 1% in South Asia itself. I was barely half-joking when I wrote that the only “martial spirit” left in the Sikh community is devoted towards getting a Canadian visa.

    Meanwhile, Sikhs and Hindus are getting into street confrontations in Canada:

    At least it’s not a sword fight? /s from Brampton

    Once again proves three arguments I’ve been making here:

    1) thinking Islam is the problem is short-sighted, as non-Islamic groups can be – and often are – very tribal.

    2) behaviour is more tied to cultural values than religion per se

    3) a “white vs all” future is very unlikely. Kanye’s recent comments is further proof, not to mention the LA council scandal where Latinx where shitting on blacks, jews, armenians and god knows who else. The rising Hindu vs Sikh tension is just the latest manifestation of that. In Södertälje, the recent influx of moslems from the 2015 wave has increased tensions between the Christian Assyrian community and the newcomers.

    And I might as well add Matra’s fourth rule:

    4) diaspora nationalism is only going to rise in the West as once you reach a sufficiently critical base, it will be easier to retain your identity and resist assimilation. Though I actually think this is a better outcome than everyone trying to “be white” and invariably failing in some hilarious way, since I want genuine multiculturalism.

    • Replies: @sher singh
    @Thulean Friend

    https://youtube.com/shorts/PSJcfVO-ccc?feature=share

    Canada already stopped visas & it's Australia again.
    You have no clue what's going on in Panjab u bhaiye gangetic loll
    Don't speak for the Khalsa.

    https://youtu.be/Kw14ZX5_Z0k

  320. @Barbarossa
    @Barbarossa

    The thought of having to kill and butcher my milk cow does seem like a deeply abhorrent act to me, so much so that perhaps it's not far off to label it a religious feeling.

    I'm sure this strikes many as absurd, but we live in an age where animals are regarded as mere protein production units to be exploited for maximum feed conversion with no attendant responsibilities from humans are imagined.

    In my mind, such a thing as providing me with meat or milk raises a whole host of responsibilities on my end that I must uphold. There is no free lunch after all and there really are no sinecures in life, only the accepting or evading of duty and responsibilities.

    Replies: @Mikel

    I actually sympathize with everything you’re saying. I kill my own farm animals almost weekly (only rabbits right now) but I can’t imagine not doing it in the most humane way possible. I have tasted aged old cow in the old country though and it’s a different level of deep beef taste with amazing tenderness. I’m sure you could get something similar with your steers, there’s quite a few videos on how to age beef on YT.

    • Replies: @Barbarossa
    @Mikel


    I can’t imagine not doing it in the most humane way possible.
     
    LOL, did you see Sher Singh's video on comment 327? Besides being a neat piece of swordsmanship that is a really clean way to dispatch an animal! There are Muslims that come from the nearby cities to buy sheep (though not from me) and they like to slit the throat and just let the animal bleed out for halal purposes. I prefer to put a .22 in the head first before slitting the throat as it's cleaner.

    The milk fed steers that I've done are really tender, even generally tough cuts have been cuttable with the side of a fork. I don't butcher my own beef or pigs, though I do my own sheep. Thanks for the recommendation on the aging, I should try it with the sheep and see how it does.

    On the other end of things, we were given a beef bottom round roast from a local organic grass fed farm and had it for dinner tonight. It was a $14 a lb. roast, but it was tough as nails, even though it was cooked slow with lots of liquid. Definitely not was I'm used to with my own stuff. I know them well so I might ask them what their butcher does for hanging. The flavor of the meat was good, but was so tough I wouldn't have bought it at bargain basement prices.

    Replies: @Mikel

  321. @AP
    @Dmitry


    Although much of the property wealth in Vancouver will not be so far from the Chinese Communist Party and a lot closer to it, than the ordinary Chinese people living in China
     
    Maybe so, but most of the settlers have been Hong King Chinese fleeing CCP rule and not Chinese mainlanders. These crossed the ocean with suitcases filled with cash and drove up property prices. But I’m sure that we’ll connected relatives of Chinese Communist Party officials are involved in high level speculation also.

    would at least keep the place more European.

    It depends what kind of “European”. Ukraine is between Sierra Leone and Zambia in the corruption perceptions index
     

    I think you would not confuse Lviv or Vynnytsia with Zambia or Sierra Leone :-)

    life is necessarily better but because more money can be made

    Life generally is really better, which is not to say life in Poland
     

    Life is not generally worse in Krakow than in any German city, the latter’s only real advantage is higher income and related to that better and more retail stores. This is why many Poles go to Germany to work, but send the money back to Poland where they eventually return, because Poland is a better place to be ultimately. It is architecturally no worse, arts and culture great, food and restaurants are no worse, public transportation and roads are fine, but culture is more conservative and the place isn’t flooded by non-Europeans.

    In Western Europe you can be unemployed and you still have a comfortable life, with money to relax in a cafe every day
     
    This is true, but most Poles do not aspire to be unemployed.

    For many years, the taxpayers of all the wealthy EU countries, have been used for the convergence funding, which Poland is the greatest receiver
     
    From the chart you posted, it looks like per capita Poland is far from being the biggest receiver. A lot of that money goes to back to the western EU countries in the form of Poland consuming western EU goods?

    And again, Western Europe is so generous when it comes to giving money to non-European settlers in Western Europe. There is nothing shameful about eastern Europeans diverting some money to other Europeans, instead.

    If I were a German I would rather spend money upgrading a bus system in some Polish city than building houses for Syrian settlers in my city.

    Replies: @Dmitry

    most of the settlers have been Hong

    The report says wealthy immigrants in Vancouver are mainland Chinese, connected to the political elite (Chinese Communist Party).

    They discuss the poor Chinese who had been the population in Vancouver before the 2000s, which have not much connection to the new wealthy immigrants. https://youtu.be/IZs2i3Bpxx4?t=360.

    This is like wealthy Chinese in Europe. Children of China’s political elite are always moving hundreds of billions of dollars to the West, which reminds of the last twenty years Russia. In Russia, the main purpose of ruling class of the last decades has been moving to the West, this is the reason to be ruling class, but China’s ruling class also has a few of these aspects.

    connected relatives of Chinese Communist Party officials are involved in high level speculation also.

    It’s not speculation, they will be quietly moving money to the West, in order to move the money (not to increase the money).

    Wealthy people in Russia are living by moving money to the West this century. The main purpose has not been to multiply the money in the West, it is to move it into the West.

    you would not confuse Lviv or Vynnytsia with Zambia or Sierra Leone

    Creating an open borders system with Ukraine, is not a light medicine for the wealthy countries. Perceptions of corruption can be equal, but likely Ukraine will have a more powerful mafia than Zambia or Sierra Leone and Ukraine’s costs for the EU could potentially be vast – you only need to see how much money Poland has pulled from Europe.

    latter’s only real advantage is higher income and related to that better

    Better income, more work/life balance, better services, better education, better environment (Poland has the most polluted air in Europe), better healthcare, etc. I.e. objective indicators.

    per capita Poland is far from being the biggest receiver.

    Poland is the greatest receiver of EU money in the net terms, which is the relevant one as we are talking about the country.

    Western Europe. There is nothing shameful about eastern Europeans diverting some money to other Europeans

    The taxpayers who are paying for Eastern Europe are not Eastern Europeans, they are the Western Europeans from the net positive countries.

    If I were a German I would rather spend money upgrading a bus system in some Polish city

    I would prefer spend the money upgrading a bus system in a German city.

    building houses for Syrian settlers in my city.

    You can be so critical of Syrians, but it’s not like the postsoviet space is recently appearing more in the civilized world and European values. If I remember Syrians were only cutting off heads, not boiling them.

    • Replies: @AP
    @Dmitry


    The report says wealthy immigrants in Vancouver are mainland Chinese
     
    Maybe the recent ones and the super-rich, but the Chinese masses in Vancouver are mostly from Hong Kong (and I would add Taiwan).

    Incoming mainland Chinese started to outnumber incoming Hong Kongers in the mid 2000s but most of the Chinese in Vancouver have non-mainland origins (mostly Hong Kong, also Taiwan) due to the massive head start in immigration in the 1980s and 1990s.


    There is nothing shameful about eastern Europeans diverting some money to other Europeans

    The taxpayers who are paying for Eastern Europe are not Eastern Europeans, they are the Western Europeans
     

    Yes. And these same taxpayers pay to settle their own homelands with non-Europeans. It is good when Eastern Europeans get some of that money diverted to help other Europeans, instead of it all being used to fund their western cousins’ own replacement.

    You can be so critical of Syrians, but it’s not like the postsoviet space is recently appearing more in the civilized world and European values. If I remember Syrians were only cutting off heads, not boiling them
     
    You have a funny tendency to find some weird abnormal phenomenon and make broad and false conclusions about it. Such as the utterly marginal “Mormon” polygamists, and now some Ukrainian soldier who boiled a Russian soldier’s head.

    What general conclusion will you make about the culture of the western EU, based on the case of the German cannibal? He found that the person tastes like pork.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/dec/04/germany.lukeharding

    Replies: @Dmitry

  322. @Thulean Friend
    @Barbarossa


    I’ll be happy to raise the threat assessment once you guys have solidified control of the Indian subcontinent.
     
    The way things are going, I'd bet on Canada first. From their latest census:

    https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/221026/cg221026b002-eng.png

    Sikhs comprised 1.7% of India's population in the last Indian census (2011). The numbers for the newest Indian census aren't out but the percentage has either stagnated or perhaps even dropped due to massive emigration.

    So Canada now has more Sikhs as a percentage of its population than India. Statistics Canada has more details:


    The diversity of the South Asian group can also be observed in the broad range of mother tongues reported in the 2021 Census, with English (36.4%), Punjabi (29.4%), Urdu (11.3%), Hindi (8.2%), Tamil (7.1%) and Gujarati (6.4%) the most commonly reported, alone or with other languages.

    Finally, the top three religions reported by South Asians are Hinduism (29.9%), Sikhism (29.6%) and Islam (23.1%).
     

    Sikhs comprise nearly 1/3rd of all South Asians in Canada but are less than 1% in South Asia itself. I was barely half-joking when I wrote that the only "martial spirit" left in the Sikh community is devoted towards getting a Canadian visa.

    ---

    Meanwhile, Sikhs and Hindus are getting into street confrontations in Canada:

    https://www.reddit.com/r/Brampton/comments/yd1ifa/at_least_its_not_a_sword_fight_s/

    Once again proves three arguments I've been making here:

    1) thinking Islam is the problem is short-sighted, as non-Islamic groups can be - and often are - very tribal.

    2) behaviour is more tied to cultural values than religion per se

    3) a "white vs all" future is very unlikely. Kanye's recent comments is further proof, not to mention the LA council scandal where Latinx where shitting on blacks, jews, armenians and god knows who else. The rising Hindu vs Sikh tension is just the latest manifestation of that. In Södertälje, the recent influx of moslems from the 2015 wave has increased tensions between the Christian Assyrian community and the newcomers.

    And I might as well add Matra's fourth rule:

    4) diaspora nationalism is only going to rise in the West as once you reach a sufficiently critical base, it will be easier to retain your identity and resist assimilation. Though I actually think this is a better outcome than everyone trying to "be white" and invariably failing in some hilarious way, since I want genuine multiculturalism.

    Replies: @sher singh

    https://youtube.com/shorts/PSJcfVO-ccc?feature=share

    Canada already stopped visas & it’s Australia again.
    You have no clue what’s going on in Panjab u bhaiye gangetic loll
    Don’t speak for the Khalsa.

  323. @songbird
    @sudden death

    In Sikhism, meals in the past were communal affairs. They made a religious-egalitarian point of eating together, in a large group, as is evidenced by the writings of the gurus.

    Meanwhile modern genetics has proved how different Hindu castes (that have different food taboos) are.

    What was the early history of Jews among other groups in the Middle East? Did they also live among non-pork eaters, and was it a general taboo? It's possible but remember most Jews today are Ashkenazi. They lived among Europeans who ate pork, and IMO, it helps explain why such a small group became so many. Another small reason: probably adaptive to have your butchers all be in the same community, to keep the money in the community too.

    But a pork ban is a great way of getting rid of apostates because pork is hard to resist. Reform Jews (who often eat pork) seem like they are dying out. Not so the Orthodox.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Dmitry, @YetAnotherAnon

    pork ban is a great way

    Historically Jews were much more like cults, or at least not like a nationality (at least from sometime of destruction of the Second Temple until the 20th century).

    I’m not an expert about cults. But it looks it is necessary to have rules which distinguish from the people who are inside the cult, from people who are outside the cult, just like Mormons have to ban very American drinks of coffee and tea.

    Unlike in a nationality, being in the cult is not a passive identity, but requires active following of rules which separate you against people outside the cult. Until the 19th century or later in some places, if Jews were not actively following the religious rules, they would have to exit the cult and not be Jews. A concept of “secular Jews” was not existing, would be viewed as a contradiction. Either you follow the rule or you are exiting.

    Banning of pork is course one of the less complicated rules for Jewish food observances, as there are much more complicated rules (like separate kitchens for meat and dairy).

    If you read in the ex-Mormon forums, some Mormons there are writing they feel instinctively fear of coffee, even years after they exit the cult. There is a thread where they are talking about how they feel a nervous tension when they drink coffee.

    Bacon and shellfish is a fashionable food in Israel with the secular population. One of the most fashionable chains for restaurants, is giving different kinds of bacon all day, which is not exactly a luxury food in most countries (https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2019-02-19/ty-article/.premium/why-israel-is-experiencing-a-bacon-crisis). It’s not because it is a special food, it’s because they still feel the nervous tension and hype around it. It’s like the ex-Mormons have a country, cafes would probably be very fashionable.

    • Thanks: songbird
    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @Dmitry


    If you read in the ex-Mormon forums, some Mormons there are writing they feel instinctively fear of coffee, even years after they exit the cult. There is a thread where they are talking about how they feel a nervous tension when they drink coffee.
     
    Like the Seventh Day Adventists, the shunning of coffee by the Mormons was steeped in the belief that coffee was bad for ones health. The ability to keep ones body as healthy as possible through diet and lifestyle was put into action by keeping the human body as pure as possible as it is believed was attested to through Corinthians 6:19-20 (ESV), as an admonition, “Or do you not know that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit within you, whom you have from God? You are not your own, for you were bought with a price. So glorify God in your body.”

    The problem with this observance is that it seems every time you turn around today, there is evidence that coffee includes many healthful attributes. The coffee prohibitions were promulgated during a time when coffee was seen as only a drink that included caffeine, which in itself is controversial, as caffeine itself (in moderation) is also seen today as an acceptable stimulant that many athletes use in their sports regimens. Many medical health gurus that you can view on YouTube are now advocating the drinking of coffee for health reasons.

    Replies: @Dmitry

  324. @sher singh
    @silviosilver


    Because it makes for a more pleasant society, The basic rule for unequal interactions is: you pretend the differences between us are unimportant, and I’ll pretend you haven’t noticed them. That’s not so hard to do.
     
    Dishonesty is unpleasant and destroys the soul. Brotherhood is always unequal,

    Well that’s great then. Just as ‘nation’ is better than tribe, ‘race’ is better than nation. You have to remember, I am a liberal at heart. A liberal society composed of ‘ballpark’ standard racial homogeneity? I’ll take that over ‘nation’ or ‘ethnicity’ or ‘religion’ or ‘tribe’ any day.
     
    Then a global Brazil is best.

    Thanks for quoting me out of context so that I sound like a ‘supremacist.
     
    ]

    90% of the genetic distance in Homo Sapiens is between Sub-Saharan & the rest.
    The only race is Negro or not - the rest are ethnicities.
    This makes our antagonisms, and differences more valuable.

    How would you know? It’s your own back people are talking behind.
     
    White women aren't really dishonest. A greasy Dago has every incentive to cause strife.
    I'm not caught up in any sense of greatness - the Maryada is correct, the Guru is great.

    I'm nothing.

    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ

    Replies: @silviosilver

    Dishonesty is unpleasant and destroys the soul.

    Religion is shot through with well-meaning deception, so you might want to take a look in the mirror.

    Brotherhood is always unequal,

    Ah, another nugget of sikh (?) ‘wisdom’ – you have no idea how I cherish these. It’s not quite on the level of “Religion [is] a street gang to take women” but you can’t hit them out of the park every time.

    Then a global Brazil is best.

    No, because Brazil, as a whole, doesn’t meet the ‘ballpark’ homogeneity standard. You’d need to split it up into at least two racial entities, but preferably three or four in order for it to reach what I have in mind as ‘ballpark.’ Of course, this is all highly abstract, and I’m using the ballpark concept for the purposes of illustration, not because I think by itself it’s in any way enough of a natural draw.

    In the real world, people need a common culture or common historical experiences to really feel they share something meaningful in common. My point is the commonality doesn’t have to be as common as people with a ‘tribal’ mindset tend to imagine. Such people are liable to say about, for instance, Yugoslavia that it was so ethnically mixed that it was sheer fantasy to think it could ever hold together. Well, to someone with a more liberal mindset like me, the ‘differences’ in Yugoslavia were trivial to the point of virtual meaninglessness, and I have the same attitude towards the balkans in general (and even beyond it ). Of course, it’s difficult to mash together people who speak different languages, but your own India proves that, difficult or not, it’s actually possible – despite the tremendous linguistic differences there, for political purposes they’re willing to act as one happy pajeet family.

    White women aren’t really dishonest. A greasy Dago has every incentive to cause strife.

    I have no idea what that means in relation to the post you were replying to, but it does remind me of one of my favorite dago stories. I was trying to pick up this girl at a bar once, and she called out to some bouncer she knew as he was walking past and said, teasingly, as part of the flirtation:

    Her: This guy’s harassing me, can you throw him out?

    Bouncer: [looks me over] He’s a dago like me, why should I?

    Her: [trying to say something but bouncer walked off]

    Me: [with a cheeky gleam] Suck. Fucking. Shit.

    That’s clearly a pretty steep fall from Jane Austen standards of courtship, and I feel half guilty for acting as an agent of cultural decay myself in this instance (and numerous others like it), but guys are always going to opt for what ‘works’ in the moment and neglect the longer term cultural corrosion their (our) behavior generates.

    Back to the racial angle though, this was in a small regional city that hadn’t seen much in the way of immigration (but which by now could be half pajeet for all I know), so there was virtually an automatic kind of solidarity among greaseballs, that often went beyond the merely humorous (as in my anecdote).

    • Replies: @Sher Singh
    @silviosilver


    Religion is shot through with well-meaning deception, so you might want to take a look in the mirror.
     
    Monotheism is deceptive. What's the deception in Worship Weapons, Lift Weights?.
    Sikhi is straight forward & honest - you don't even hide your form/identity.

    Then a global Brazil is best.
     
    No, I'm saying the logical conclusion of tribe -> nation -> race is mutt planet.
    You can't stop the cuck train once you get on.

    Bouncer: [looks me over] He’s a dago like me, why should I?
     
    Based.

    for political purposes they’re willing to act as one happy pajeet family.
     
    Panjab is split into 2 countries that point nukes at each other.

    https://youtube.com/shorts/PSJcfVO-ccc
    , @Emil Nikola Richard
    @silviosilver

    Have you seen the David Buss bit where he claims stalking is a successful mating strategy for male homo sapiens ~ 15 % of the time?

    https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/917192.Evolutionary_Psychology

    Replies: @silviosilver

    , @Wokechoke
    @silviosilver

    Correct about the Balkans. I’ve been through the area during the troubles there and after. The differences between these folk amount to nothing from the outsider perspective. Even the Muslim v Catholic v orthodox stuff is absurd. One thing about the Croats is that they look toward Italy and the Serbs look toward Moscow. They could have just as easily remained a Yugo Land though. The war in the area was probably done to prevent Moscow from strangling the Danube river at Belgrade as a min-practice for blocking the Don and Azov later on.


    Looking at the map from a wider perspective perhaps all Western and Central Europe is a Meta Balkan. Pointlessly fractured over trivia.

  325. Sher Singh says:
    @silviosilver
    @sher singh


    Dishonesty is unpleasant and destroys the soul.
     
    Religion is shot through with well-meaning deception, so you might want to take a look in the mirror.

    Brotherhood is always unequal,
     
    Ah, another nugget of sikh (?) 'wisdom' - you have no idea how I cherish these. It's not quite on the level of "Religion [is] a street gang to take women" but you can't hit them out of the park every time.

    Then a global Brazil is best.
     
    No, because Brazil, as a whole, doesn't meet the 'ballpark' homogeneity standard. You'd need to split it up into at least two racial entities, but preferably three or four in order for it to reach what I have in mind as 'ballpark.' Of course, this is all highly abstract, and I'm using the ballpark concept for the purposes of illustration, not because I think by itself it's in any way enough of a natural draw.

    In the real world, people need a common culture or common historical experiences to really feel they share something meaningful in common. My point is the commonality doesn't have to be as common as people with a 'tribal' mindset tend to imagine. Such people are liable to say about, for instance, Yugoslavia that it was so ethnically mixed that it was sheer fantasy to think it could ever hold together. Well, to someone with a more liberal mindset like me, the 'differences' in Yugoslavia were trivial to the point of virtual meaninglessness, and I have the same attitude towards the balkans in general (and even beyond it ). Of course, it's difficult to mash together people who speak different languages, but your own India proves that, difficult or not, it's actually possible - despite the tremendous linguistic differences there, for political purposes they're willing to act as one happy pajeet family.

    White women aren’t really dishonest. A greasy Dago has every incentive to cause strife.
     
    I have no idea what that means in relation to the post you were replying to, but it does remind me of one of my favorite dago stories. I was trying to pick up this girl at a bar once, and she called out to some bouncer she knew as he was walking past and said, teasingly, as part of the flirtation:

    Her: This guy's harassing me, can you throw him out?

    Bouncer: [looks me over] He's a dago like me, why should I?

    Her: [trying to say something but bouncer walked off]

    Me: [with a cheeky gleam] Suck. Fucking. Shit.

    That's clearly a pretty steep fall from Jane Austen standards of courtship, and I feel half guilty for acting as an agent of cultural decay myself in this instance (and numerous others like it), but guys are always going to opt for what 'works' in the moment and neglect the longer term cultural corrosion their (our) behavior generates.

    Back to the racial angle though, this was in a small regional city that hadn't seen much in the way of immigration (but which by now could be half pajeet for all I know), so there was virtually an automatic kind of solidarity among greaseballs, that often went beyond the merely humorous (as in my anecdote).

    Replies: @Sher Singh, @Emil Nikola Richard, @Wokechoke

    Religion is shot through with well-meaning deception, so you might want to take a look in the mirror.

    Monotheism is deceptive. What’s the deception in Worship Weapons, Lift Weights?.
    Sikhi is straight forward & honest – you don’t even hide your form/identity.

    Then a global Brazil is best.

    No, I’m saying the logical conclusion of tribe -> nation -> race is mutt planet.
    You can’t stop the cuck train once you get on.

    Bouncer: [looks me over] He’s a dago like me, why should I?

    Based.

    for political purposes they’re willing to act as one happy pajeet family.

    Panjab is split into 2 countries that point nukes at each other.

    https://youtube.com/shorts/PSJcfVO-ccc

  326. Haven’t watched yet.

  327. Integrating into the Toronto soccer fag culture involves tolerating niggers & avoiding weapons.
    Rather just have an enclave :shrug:

    Jai Bhagauti

    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ

  328. @Dmitry
    @A123

    It is pro-government telegram channels. A pro-government telegram channel they use to try to influence Israel has posted her cartoon. https://t.me/s/ukroterror2 Then it was viral with the informal social media/pro-government channels in Russia.

    They said it was from a far-right religious (I guess funded by American settler groups, with support for Trump) media which could have the same INN acronym in English, which reply to say they are not associated.
    https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/361603

    You can doubt a topic of Ukraine's hopes for EU integration and need to be "rescued by" Russian government, would be interesting for media of far-right religious Zionist settlers sitting between olive trees in the Jordan Valley and conflict with Palestinian militants.

    Replies: @A123

    Thanks. This is worth noting:

    The updated video also features a fake news logo for the INN channel, with Hebrew text reading “Israel Neged Nazi’im” (Israel Against Nazis) “The Telegram Channel.” It is unclear if the video’s logo was intended as a reference to Israel National News.

    The videos never had any connection to Israel or Judaism.

    The imagery was so overwhelmingly Christian background, I am surprised that anyone bit on it as Jewish created. However, as we all know, things go viral for very little reason.

    PEACE 😇

  329. @LatW
    @silviosilver


    I must say it’s interesting the way AP gets off on taunting the very people he is most relying on to aid his precious Ukraine. The extreme butthurt he feels – let’s face it, it’s gotta hurt for a prideful Uke to think his country could soon be outclassed by even the lowly pajeets of hindoostan – makes him say very weird and very spiteful things.
     
    That's not really how a typical Ukrainian (from Ukraine) thinks, though, it's an attitude more in line with middle class or upper middle class SWPLs in the West (I've heard it from them before, too, using almost exactly the same language, "it's a cycle", "it's how history goes", I was dumbfounded, tbh, and when I first heard it what shocked me the most was the ease of the acceptance of these facts on the ground, not to mention I felt deeply offended, this was a rich Scots Irish boomer woman who said this, completely oblivious to her children's and grandchildren's future). It's not how a typical Ukrainian who had been raised in Ukraine would think. Not at all. First, this is not even on their radar right now. Second, if they did think about the replacement, even some of the normies (not to even mention the nationalists) would feel a bit taken aback if they saw what's really going on. They will definitely care if it starts happening in UA. The only question is if they'll have the resources to withstand it.

    It is kind of true though that first they displaced the Natives. It's just that does it really mean that the new settlers would have to be displaced, too? It's an ideological question.

    Replies: @Coconuts, @S

    I was dumbfounded, tbh, and when I first heard it what shocked me the most was the ease of the acceptance of these facts on the ground, not to mention I felt deeply offended, this was a rich Scots Irish boomer woman who said this, completely oblivious to her children’s and grandchildren’s future.

    I think there is this thing among liberal boomers, where they are moralistic about being hedonistic and self-centred during their lifetime, and then their life can be crowned by the altruistic gift of handing on their territory and assets to what they perceive as oppressed groups after their death.

    This is probably one of the things contributing to the currently growing idea that group identity is more important and real than individual identity and experience. Boomers’ children can therefore offer valid atonement and must make amends for the perceived shortcomings of their parents, grandparents, great-grandparents etc. It’s sort of masked to some extent as relating to impersonal ‘systems of social power’.

    First, this is not even on their radar right now. Second, if they did think about the replacement, even some of the normies (not to even mention the nationalists) would feel a bit taken aback if they saw what’s really going on. They will definitely care if it starts happening in UA. The only question is if they’ll have the resources to withstand it.

    That seems to fit closely with the attitude of the Belarusians I know, except it feels like the ones living in the UK are becoming aware of something weird going on in British/Anglo society.

    It is kind of true though that first they displaced the Natives. It’s just that does it really mean that the new settlers would have to be displaced, too? It’s an ideological question.

    You find similar arguments being put forward in Britain itself, by white British people; because British people from some time ago went to North America and Australia and committed genocide against the natives, large shrinking of the white population and large immigration from Africa and South Asia into the UK is appropriate justice or payback and so is a positive thing.

    At the same time, the idea that demographic change is happening is often still considered a relatively outlandish or left-field racist idea, you seem to find people who hold the two ideas simultaneously. Similar to the immigration parallax thing from the US.

    • Replies: @LatW
    @Coconuts


    I think there is this thing among liberal boomers, where they are moralistic about being hedonistic and self-centred during their lifetime, and then their life can be crowned by the altruistic gift of handing on their territory and assets to what they perceive as oppressed groups after their death.
     
    I don't want to bash that generation as a whole, but there are definitely trends when it comes to liberal boomers. It should just be noted that their wealth was not created just by them, but also from the input of the previous generations. Interesting thing about this group though is how, in their personal lives, they are actually very conservative (even if they may have had a somewhat liberal lifestyle in their youth). They are very lifestyle conscientious, frugal and wouldn't do in a million years some of the things that are propagated by the left these days. That's kind of telling, I'd say. Liberalism for thee, but not for me.

    Btw, speaking of distributing funds, there's a recent documentary about the funding of BLM (made by Candace Owens) - apparently some of the funds were squandered and went into questionable directions.

    But to be fair, a lot of the donations do go out to positive causes, a lot of the legacy projects will probably be valuable for everyone.

    Boomers’ children can therefore offer valid atonement and must make amends for the perceived shortcomings of their parents, grandparents, great-grandparents etc. It’s sort of masked to some extent as relating to impersonal ‘systems of social power’.
     
    Yea, but they don't own the children in a way that they can decide this for them. This is why the middle generation and the children themselves need to stand up. The "systems of impersonal power" will collapse once you speak out and make it personal. Personal is political, right?

    That seems to fit closely with the attitude of the Belarusians I know, except it feels like the ones living in the UK are becoming aware of something weird going on in British/Anglo society.
     
    I'm curious as to how Eastern Slavic normies feel about this. How much resistance they can put up, probably not insane amounts as many of them will "go with the flow" but we will need them nevertheless as a shoulder to lean on.

    You find similar arguments being put forward in Britain itself, by white British people; because British people from some time ago went to North America and Australia and committed genocide against the natives, large shrinking of the white population and large immigration from Africa and South Asia into the UK is appropriate justice or payback and so is a positive thing

     

    One can question the causality there. Not to take away from your ownership of your great Empire, but just because you were somewhere at some point, doesn't mean you should be reduced in your own homeland. Where does one make that leap from just rolling back the Empire to all of a sudden all British of all generations and income levels have to pay in their ancestral home? A bit far fetched, I'd say. One simply needs to dissect this narrative to show that the continuity doesn't apply to the indigenous British and their land.
  330. @Emil Nikola Richard
    @songbird

    A Catholic priest told me that in communities with a starvation problem it was considered extremely rude to the poorest members to keep pigs. They do not eat grass. They eat what is nutritious for humans in theory. The priest claimed this was the genesis of the pork eating taboo.

    Tom Harrisson, in Living Among the Cannibals, wrote that human meat tastes like pork.

    https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1288353.Living_Among_Cannibals

    Eugene McCarthy argues that humans are a chimpanzee-pig hybrid.

    http://www.macroevolution.net/human-origins.html

    Replies: @sher singh, @Wokechoke, @songbird

    Pigs can eat through dead humans. Never trust a pig farmer. Also yes Pigs taste like humans. Sans the aroma of piss and shit and rotting flesh, a battle fields with incendiaries thrown around smell like a pork holocaust.

    I think the Jews also latched onto eating no pork for a simple reason. The Greeks enjoyed it as a meal. To define themselves from the Greek overlords the Jews clung to this dietary restriction as a marker of national identity.

    The Diadochi Selucids taunted the Jews with pork feasts.

    • Replies: @silviosilver
    @Wokechoke


    The Diadochi Selucids taunted the Jews with pork feasts.
     
    Why would that be humiliating to Jews though? Jews maintain that pigs are 'unclean' (or whatever), not sacred. You'd expect the Jewish attitude to be "hey, go ahead, goy, knock yourself out" rather than "oy vey, I'm so insulted."
  331. @silviosilver
    @AP


    Once upon a time the British Europeans displaced the native Indians and now the cycle continues and the Chinese and Asian Indians have displaced the British Europeans,
     
    Lol, as I never tire of pointing out, the racial bullshit never ceases with this mendacious worm.

    The "cycle continues", you see. It's just a natural part of the rhythm of life. Has nothing to do with, you know, deliberate fucking policy.

    I must say it's interesting the way AP gets off on taunting the very people he is most relying on to aid his precious Ukraine. The extreme butthurt he feels - let's face it, it's gotta hurt for a prideful Uke to think his country could soon be outclassed by even the lowly pajeets of hindoostan - makes him say very weird and very spiteful things.

    Replies: @sher singh, @AP, @LatW, @Wokechoke

    Any English cheering on Ukies under Zelenskyy at this point are just suckers. The actual battle is in London, Bradford, Birmingham etc. Who cares if Alex/Oleg or Olex/Oleh run Kiev/Keev when the mayor is called Khan and the PM is Sunak.

    • Replies: @sudden death
    @Wokechoke

    Lack of honest look at the mirror is apparent though - any English cheering on RF'ians under Putin at this point are not any different from those alleged suckers too;)

    Replies: @silviosilver

  332. @silviosilver
    @Thulean Friend


    demographically infiltrating elite circles in key Western countries instead of trying to build up national strength á la China. Perhaps the smarter long-term strategy.
     
    Lol, talk about making a virtue out of necessity.

    Of course, given the choice, they'd happily take the national strength that China has achieved; it's simply that, being less competent, they haven't (and perhaps - certainly it is to be hoped - they never will).

    And also of course, it is white stupidity and apathy that has enabled the infiltration, rather than the ingenuity of hindoo wiles. Even wokesters are more likely to characterize interactions with pajeets as "repellant" than "charming."

    And also also of course, none but a pajeet would celebrate any of this. It's interesting how subdued the "first Indian PM!" reaction has been. If it were the "first black PM!" Britcucks would be fainting from the ecstasy.

    Replies: @sher singh, @Wokechoke

    A good example of this was the career and biography of Imran Khan. Educated in an excellent private school in Worcestershire he was basically an Englishman. He became the legendary captain of the Pakistan cricket team. When he turned to politics he moved to his motherland and played his part as a man there. He could have easily been a cabinet minister in the UK or even a PM. But he was a decent enough gentleman to have his second career where he could do most good for his kind.

    Sunak is a walking talking insult.

    • LOL: sher singh
  333. @Wokechoke
    @Emil Nikola Richard

    Pigs can eat through dead humans. Never trust a pig farmer. Also yes Pigs taste like humans. Sans the aroma of piss and shit and rotting flesh, a battle fields with incendiaries thrown around smell like a pork holocaust.


    I think the Jews also latched onto eating no pork for a simple reason. The Greeks enjoyed it as a meal. To define themselves from the Greek overlords the Jews clung to this dietary restriction as a marker of national identity.


    The Diadochi Selucids taunted the Jews with pork feasts.

    Replies: @silviosilver

    The Diadochi Selucids taunted the Jews with pork feasts.

    Why would that be humiliating to Jews though? Jews maintain that pigs are ‘unclean’ (or whatever), not sacred. You’d expect the Jewish attitude to be “hey, go ahead, goy, knock yourself out” rather than “oy vey, I’m so insulted.”

  334. @Wokechoke
    @silviosilver

    Any English cheering on Ukies under Zelenskyy at this point are just suckers. The actual battle is in London, Bradford, Birmingham etc. Who cares if Alex/Oleg or Olex/Oleh run Kiev/Keev when the mayor is called Khan and the PM is Sunak.

    Replies: @sudden death

    Lack of honest look at the mirror is apparent though – any English cheering on RF’ians under Putin at this point are not any different from those alleged suckers too;)

    • Replies: @silviosilver
    @sudden death

    I've been kinda indifferent towards who prevails, at times thinking it would be better if Russia did, other times if Ukraine did. I'm still not really sure. But I must say I've recently been swayed by Greg Johnson's principled approach, as outlined in these two pieces:

    https://counter-currents.com/2022/10/the-ukraine-war-one-last-time/

    https://counter-currents.com/2022/10/questions-on-nato-russia-ukraine/

    The kind of arguments that he has received against that position seem pretty weak to me. If I were to attempt to argue against it, I think I'd begin by questioning the real value of nationalist ethnostates for the purposes of pro-white politics. I would accuse Greg of arguing for ethnostates because that is more expedient - that's where all the rightwing energy is, and he is simply feeding off it - rather than because that is the best for the long-term.

    Greg thinks that with a nationalist structure in place, the nationalist policies will simply need to be refined so that they reflect the interests of the ethnic nation (and those deemed to be racially compatible with it). He ignores the fact the value system of virtually every single formerly white state is vehemently opposed to his preferred policies - many of them are woke liberal to the hilt (certainly all his favorite ones are).

    I would argue that it is better to have a society with strongly conservative attitudes in place, even if for the time being these attitudes relate to religion or culture rather than race, and even if their multiculturalism/multiracialism is of such long standing that it could be framed (even revered) as "traditional," since that still allows the majority group, the preferred in-group (eg Russians in Russia), to speak positively in its own name. I would argue that in time, it would simpler for that in-group to demand firmer recognition of its essential life requirements (including racially exclusive territory) than to attempt to reform a woke liberal polity into a racial nationalist polity. In this respect, if anyone has the territory to spare to accommodate all the various groups that may require it,it's Russia (and the Anglosphere too).

    I keep saying "I would" because I'm not actually convinced of this position. It's just how I would go about refuting Greg, because it addresses the core of his argument, whereas his opponents' arguments as they appear in the comments are frankly moronic, nothing but typical Russia-troll quality.

    (Unfortunately, I'm unable to post this on his site, since he long ago banned me. Even anti-vaxxers are more welcome at this site than I am, sadly.)

    Replies: @Matra, @Wokechoke, @Mikhail

  335. @sudden death
    @Wokechoke

    Lack of honest look at the mirror is apparent though - any English cheering on RF'ians under Putin at this point are not any different from those alleged suckers too;)

    Replies: @silviosilver

    I’ve been kinda indifferent towards who prevails, at times thinking it would be better if Russia did, other times if Ukraine did. I’m still not really sure. But I must say I’ve recently been swayed by Greg Johnson’s principled approach, as outlined in these two pieces:

    https://counter-currents.com/2022/10/the-ukraine-war-one-last-time/

    https://counter-currents.com/2022/10/questions-on-nato-russia-ukraine/

    The kind of arguments that he has received against that position seem pretty weak to me. If I were to attempt to argue against it, I think I’d begin by questioning the real value of nationalist ethnostates for the purposes of pro-white politics. I would accuse Greg of arguing for ethnostates because that is more expedient – that’s where all the rightwing energy is, and he is simply feeding off it – rather than because that is the best for the long-term.

    Greg thinks that with a nationalist structure in place, the nationalist policies will simply need to be refined so that they reflect the interests of the ethnic nation (and those deemed to be racially compatible with it). He ignores the fact the value system of virtually every single formerly white state is vehemently opposed to his preferred policies – many of them are woke liberal to the hilt (certainly all his favorite ones are).

    I would argue that it is better to have a society with strongly conservative attitudes in place, even if for the time being these attitudes relate to religion or culture rather than race, and even if their multiculturalism/multiracialism is of such long standing that it could be framed (even revered) as “traditional,” since that still allows the majority group, the preferred in-group (eg Russians in Russia), to speak positively in its own name. I would argue that in time, it would simpler for that in-group to demand firmer recognition of its essential life requirements (including racially exclusive territory) than to attempt to reform a woke liberal polity into a racial nationalist polity. In this respect, if anyone has the territory to spare to accommodate all the various groups that may require it,it’s Russia (and the Anglosphere too).

    I keep saying “I would” because I’m not actually convinced of this position. It’s just how I would go about refuting Greg, because it addresses the core of his argument, whereas his opponents’ arguments as they appear in the comments are frankly moronic, nothing but typical Russia-troll quality.

    (Unfortunately, I’m unable to post this on his site, since he long ago banned me. Even anti-vaxxers are more welcome at this site than I am, sadly.)

    • Replies: @Matra
    @silviosilver

    I haven't yet read your links or thought about the argument you attribute to Johnson but I heard/read him claim that because France was able to leave NATO (they only withdrew from its integrated command but still aligned with it) in the 1960s that leaving NATO is a viable option today as if we have the same ruling elites now that we had back then. I can think of many occasions from Canada at the start of the Cuban Missile Crisis to West Germany over the original pipelines to the USSR when NATO countries were able to stand up to the US in ways they can't or won't today. This is not the 60s anymore. Today our elites are completely oriented towards the US (whether voluntarily or not). Today that NATO is actively bringing refugees from North Africa into Europe and I don't see it becoming a structure for any future nationalist governments as long as the US (and UK) are connected with it.

    Anyway, I find a lot of WNist arguments in favour of Ukraine to be disingenuous. Many are just a cover for Eastern European nationalists (Johnson has lots of such connections such as the Macedonian guy who claims it is clear and obvious that Russia sabotaged Nord Stream 2 and who gets upset any time someone is sympathetic to Serbia). Another reason why I think - based on decades of observing American WNists in particular - many of them are really pro-Ukraine is their bizarre fetish for Nazi/Fascist aesthetics. Azov fighting Russians, who sometimes fly the hammer & sickle, is just too much for them to resist. It turns them on.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    , @Wokechoke
    @silviosilver

    What happens in Kiev will be sponsored by Hindus like Sunak, who though not public ally associated with opposing Russia, will now own it in a very special way. Right as White Brits get rounded up for protesting energy price hikes and mass migrations.

    The role of the UK in stirring up trouble in Crimea and Azov Sea area is lock stock and two smoking barrels the work of Sunak at this point. A Chancellor of the Exchequer is generally in all the big meetings greenlighting all the major decisions. The pipelines, bridges, sinkings, car bombings are all run through treasury at some point.

    Replies: @sher singh

    , @Mikhail
    @silviosilver

    Latest Douglas Macgregor

    Re: Below Linked Show (scroll down after clicking into link)

    Coherent facts and fact-based comments in line with what I've been saying all along. Some follow-up points.

    On the misinformation about Putin and nukes, reference could've been made to Liz Truss' brazen comment about her willingness to use that option. Macgregor astutely notes that Russia has other options besides using nukes, in addition to noting some Kiev regime comments regarding their developing a dirty bomb scenario.

    The Neville Chamberlin appeasement point against Russia brought up by host Frank Morano should be accurately looked at another way. Russia has been faced with appeasing a corrupt, undemocratic and neo-Nazi influenced Kiev regime with blood on its hands going back prior to 2/24/22. Said entity failed to honor the Minsk Protocol it signed as it built up its forces and sought NATO membership.

    As I've noted, Russia has shown the willingness to recognize questionably drawn Communist boundaries on the provision that it doesn't pose a security threat and oppress pro-Russian people, who for centuries have been in the same nation as Russia.

    https://wabcradio.com/episode/col-douglas-macgregor-retired-u-s-army-colonel-10-26-2022/

  336. @silviosilver
    @sher singh


    Dishonesty is unpleasant and destroys the soul.
     
    Religion is shot through with well-meaning deception, so you might want to take a look in the mirror.

    Brotherhood is always unequal,
     
    Ah, another nugget of sikh (?) 'wisdom' - you have no idea how I cherish these. It's not quite on the level of "Religion [is] a street gang to take women" but you can't hit them out of the park every time.

    Then a global Brazil is best.
     
    No, because Brazil, as a whole, doesn't meet the 'ballpark' homogeneity standard. You'd need to split it up into at least two racial entities, but preferably three or four in order for it to reach what I have in mind as 'ballpark.' Of course, this is all highly abstract, and I'm using the ballpark concept for the purposes of illustration, not because I think by itself it's in any way enough of a natural draw.

    In the real world, people need a common culture or common historical experiences to really feel they share something meaningful in common. My point is the commonality doesn't have to be as common as people with a 'tribal' mindset tend to imagine. Such people are liable to say about, for instance, Yugoslavia that it was so ethnically mixed that it was sheer fantasy to think it could ever hold together. Well, to someone with a more liberal mindset like me, the 'differences' in Yugoslavia were trivial to the point of virtual meaninglessness, and I have the same attitude towards the balkans in general (and even beyond it ). Of course, it's difficult to mash together people who speak different languages, but your own India proves that, difficult or not, it's actually possible - despite the tremendous linguistic differences there, for political purposes they're willing to act as one happy pajeet family.

    White women aren’t really dishonest. A greasy Dago has every incentive to cause strife.
     
    I have no idea what that means in relation to the post you were replying to, but it does remind me of one of my favorite dago stories. I was trying to pick up this girl at a bar once, and she called out to some bouncer she knew as he was walking past and said, teasingly, as part of the flirtation:

    Her: This guy's harassing me, can you throw him out?

    Bouncer: [looks me over] He's a dago like me, why should I?

    Her: [trying to say something but bouncer walked off]

    Me: [with a cheeky gleam] Suck. Fucking. Shit.

    That's clearly a pretty steep fall from Jane Austen standards of courtship, and I feel half guilty for acting as an agent of cultural decay myself in this instance (and numerous others like it), but guys are always going to opt for what 'works' in the moment and neglect the longer term cultural corrosion their (our) behavior generates.

    Back to the racial angle though, this was in a small regional city that hadn't seen much in the way of immigration (but which by now could be half pajeet for all I know), so there was virtually an automatic kind of solidarity among greaseballs, that often went beyond the merely humorous (as in my anecdote).

    Replies: @Sher Singh, @Emil Nikola Richard, @Wokechoke

    Have you seen the David Buss bit where he claims stalking is a successful mating strategy for male homo sapiens ~ 15 % of the time?

    https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/917192.Evolutionary_Psychology

    • Replies: @silviosilver
    @Emil Nikola Richard

    No, I hadn't heard of that. I've been meaning to read Buss for ages. Don't you have a link to the relevant passage? The claim sounds very interesting, but I cbf scouring the whole book trying to find something on it

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard

  337. @Dmitry
    @songbird


    pork ban is a great way
     
    Historically Jews were much more like cults, or at least not like a nationality (at least from sometime of destruction of the Second Temple until the 20th century).

    I'm not an expert about cults. But it looks it is necessary to have rules which distinguish from the people who are inside the cult, from people who are outside the cult, just like Mormons have to ban very American drinks of coffee and tea.

    Unlike in a nationality, being in the cult is not a passive identity, but requires active following of rules which separate you against people outside the cult. Until the 19th century or later in some places, if Jews were not actively following the religious rules, they would have to exit the cult and not be Jews. A concept of "secular Jews" was not existing, would be viewed as a contradiction. Either you follow the rule or you are exiting.

    Banning of pork is course one of the less complicated rules for Jewish food observances, as there are much more complicated rules (like separate kitchens for meat and dairy).

    If you read in the ex-Mormon forums, some Mormons there are writing they feel instinctively fear of coffee, even years after they exit the cult. There is a thread where they are talking about how they feel a nervous tension when they drink coffee.

    Bacon and shellfish is a fashionable food in Israel with the secular population. One of the most fashionable chains for restaurants, is giving different kinds of bacon all day, which is not exactly a luxury food in most countries (https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2019-02-19/ty-article/.premium/why-israel-is-experiencing-a-bacon-crisis). It's not because it is a special food, it's because they still feel the nervous tension and hype around it. It's like the ex-Mormons have a country, cafes would probably be very fashionable.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    If you read in the ex-Mormon forums, some Mormons there are writing they feel instinctively fear of coffee, even years after they exit the cult. There is a thread where they are talking about how they feel a nervous tension when they drink coffee.

    Like the Seventh Day Adventists, the shunning of coffee by the Mormons was steeped in the belief that coffee was bad for ones health. The ability to keep ones body as healthy as possible through diet and lifestyle was put into action by keeping the human body as pure as possible as it is believed was attested to through Corinthians 6:19-20 (ESV), as an admonition, “Or do you not know that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit within you, whom you have from God? You are not your own, for you were bought with a price. So glorify God in your body.”

    The problem with this observance is that it seems every time you turn around today, there is evidence that coffee includes many healthful attributes. The coffee prohibitions were promulgated during a time when coffee was seen as only a drink that included caffeine, which in itself is controversial, as caffeine itself (in moderation) is also seen today as an acceptable stimulant that many athletes use in their sports regimens. Many medical health gurus that you can view on YouTube are now advocating the drinking of coffee for health reasons.

    • Replies: @Dmitry
    @Mr. Hack

    Tea and coffee are healthy because it requires heating water to level that usually deactivates pathogenic microorganisms which are sometimes in water.

    In the ex-Mormon forum, they talk often about the health damage and parasites they receive in their missions. They are talking about how they received giardia parasites from drinking water in Latin America, in Russia, in Philippines. Some are talking about health effects from dirty water years after they finished their missions in those countries.

    Allowing tea and coffee, could have reduced risk to some extent. But who said the cults' rules, should be rational? More irrational rules can increase cost to be in the cult, increase commitment in the cult, increase conditioning for obedience of the followers. You can also notice not every rule Haredi Jews are following, will seem very rational from the perspective of science and reason.


    coffee prohibitions were promulgated during a time when coffee was seen as only a drink that included caffeine, which in itself is controversial, as caffeine
     
    They allow to drink caffeine including Red Bull or Coca Cola. https://tinyurl.com/39vt2nxy

    But tea and coffee are a taboo. And as a basic of human psychology, therefore tea and coffee are becoming hype for many of them after they exit.

    Replies: @Mikhail

  338. @Emil Nikola Richard
    @silviosilver

    Have you seen the David Buss bit where he claims stalking is a successful mating strategy for male homo sapiens ~ 15 % of the time?

    https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/917192.Evolutionary_Psychology

    Replies: @silviosilver

    No, I hadn’t heard of that. I’ve been meaning to read Buss for ages. Don’t you have a link to the relevant passage? The claim sounds very interesting, but I cbf scouring the whole book trying to find something on it

    • Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
    @silviosilver

    It has been years since I read the book but I do not believe that bit is in there. I am almost sure I would have noticed.

    It's definitely in the Huberman interview:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HXzTbCEqCJc&ab_channel=AndrewHuberman

    It's time stamped and Huberman edits his transcripts to fix all the bot transcript glitches. It's worth listening to the interview and the subtleties of their pooh-poohing over the low status of the maneuver.

  339. @Emil Nikola Richard
    @songbird

    A Catholic priest told me that in communities with a starvation problem it was considered extremely rude to the poorest members to keep pigs. They do not eat grass. They eat what is nutritious for humans in theory. The priest claimed this was the genesis of the pork eating taboo.

    Tom Harrisson, in Living Among the Cannibals, wrote that human meat tastes like pork.

    https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1288353.Living_Among_Cannibals

    Eugene McCarthy argues that humans are a chimpanzee-pig hybrid.

    http://www.macroevolution.net/human-origins.html

    Replies: @sher singh, @Wokechoke, @songbird

    There are some rumors that Scottish Highlanders had a pork taboo:
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scottish_pork_taboo

    Pig toilets may have had something to do with the origin of the Jewish taboo. Still in use in some places:
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pig_toilet

  340. @silviosilver
    @Emil Nikola Richard

    No, I hadn't heard of that. I've been meaning to read Buss for ages. Don't you have a link to the relevant passage? The claim sounds very interesting, but I cbf scouring the whole book trying to find something on it

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard

    It has been years since I read the book but I do not believe that bit is in there. I am almost sure I would have noticed.

    It’s definitely in the Huberman interview:

    It’s time stamped and Huberman edits his transcripts to fix all the bot transcript glitches. It’s worth listening to the interview and the subtleties of their pooh-poohing over the low status of the maneuver.

  341. 😆 Open Thread Humor 😂

    Open the [MORE] tab for the rest. I am going to try for politics free, but no promises.

    PEACE 😇
    __

    Have I sealed my own fate?

     

     

    For

     

    [MORE]

    Did you use enough roof nails?

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    • Replies: @Barbarossa
    @A123

    LOL, I tell my kids that they are marshmallow farms all the time. They don't believe it but it's an obligatory joke. A farmer near us used black and white wrap so each bale was both colors, so I threw in a joke in my best Southern accent about "darn miscegenated bales".

    Replies: @A123

  342. @silviosilver
    @sudden death

    I've been kinda indifferent towards who prevails, at times thinking it would be better if Russia did, other times if Ukraine did. I'm still not really sure. But I must say I've recently been swayed by Greg Johnson's principled approach, as outlined in these two pieces:

    https://counter-currents.com/2022/10/the-ukraine-war-one-last-time/

    https://counter-currents.com/2022/10/questions-on-nato-russia-ukraine/

    The kind of arguments that he has received against that position seem pretty weak to me. If I were to attempt to argue against it, I think I'd begin by questioning the real value of nationalist ethnostates for the purposes of pro-white politics. I would accuse Greg of arguing for ethnostates because that is more expedient - that's where all the rightwing energy is, and he is simply feeding off it - rather than because that is the best for the long-term.

    Greg thinks that with a nationalist structure in place, the nationalist policies will simply need to be refined so that they reflect the interests of the ethnic nation (and those deemed to be racially compatible with it). He ignores the fact the value system of virtually every single formerly white state is vehemently opposed to his preferred policies - many of them are woke liberal to the hilt (certainly all his favorite ones are).

    I would argue that it is better to have a society with strongly conservative attitudes in place, even if for the time being these attitudes relate to religion or culture rather than race, and even if their multiculturalism/multiracialism is of such long standing that it could be framed (even revered) as "traditional," since that still allows the majority group, the preferred in-group (eg Russians in Russia), to speak positively in its own name. I would argue that in time, it would simpler for that in-group to demand firmer recognition of its essential life requirements (including racially exclusive territory) than to attempt to reform a woke liberal polity into a racial nationalist polity. In this respect, if anyone has the territory to spare to accommodate all the various groups that may require it,it's Russia (and the Anglosphere too).

    I keep saying "I would" because I'm not actually convinced of this position. It's just how I would go about refuting Greg, because it addresses the core of his argument, whereas his opponents' arguments as they appear in the comments are frankly moronic, nothing but typical Russia-troll quality.

    (Unfortunately, I'm unable to post this on his site, since he long ago banned me. Even anti-vaxxers are more welcome at this site than I am, sadly.)

    Replies: @Matra, @Wokechoke, @Mikhail

    I haven’t yet read your links or thought about the argument you attribute to Johnson but I heard/read him claim that because France was able to leave NATO (they only withdrew from its integrated command but still aligned with it) in the 1960s that leaving NATO is a viable option today as if we have the same ruling elites now that we had back then. I can think of many occasions from Canada at the start of the Cuban Missile Crisis to West Germany over the original pipelines to the USSR when NATO countries were able to stand up to the US in ways they can’t or won’t today. This is not the 60s anymore. Today our elites are completely oriented towards the US (whether voluntarily or not). Today that NATO is actively bringing refugees from North Africa into Europe and I don’t see it becoming a structure for any future nationalist governments as long as the US (and UK) are connected with it.

    Anyway, I find a lot of WNist arguments in favour of Ukraine to be disingenuous. Many are just a cover for Eastern European nationalists (Johnson has lots of such connections such as the Macedonian guy who claims it is clear and obvious that Russia sabotaged Nord Stream 2 and who gets upset any time someone is sympathetic to Serbia). Another reason why I think – based on decades of observing American WNists in particular – many of them are really pro-Ukraine is their bizarre fetish for Nazi/Fascist aesthetics. Azov fighting Russians, who sometimes fly the hammer & sickle, is just too much for them to resist. It turns them on.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @Matra

    There a much more straight explanation.

    Some of the pro Ukraine figures on the racialist right are just adjuncts of the CIA. Not in and of itself a problem Much of the time it’s just that the glowing begins to get a bit obvious. Flamingly obvious.

    This war in Russo-Ukraine really suits American arms dealers and energy giants. It is very bad for Europeans. It’s also easy enough to just support Ukraine and oppose Russia. Makes life lubriciously easy. So easy!

  343. @silviosilver
    @sher singh


    Dishonesty is unpleasant and destroys the soul.
     
    Religion is shot through with well-meaning deception, so you might want to take a look in the mirror.

    Brotherhood is always unequal,
     
    Ah, another nugget of sikh (?) 'wisdom' - you have no idea how I cherish these. It's not quite on the level of "Religion [is] a street gang to take women" but you can't hit them out of the park every time.

    Then a global Brazil is best.
     
    No, because Brazil, as a whole, doesn't meet the 'ballpark' homogeneity standard. You'd need to split it up into at least two racial entities, but preferably three or four in order for it to reach what I have in mind as 'ballpark.' Of course, this is all highly abstract, and I'm using the ballpark concept for the purposes of illustration, not because I think by itself it's in any way enough of a natural draw.

    In the real world, people need a common culture or common historical experiences to really feel they share something meaningful in common. My point is the commonality doesn't have to be as common as people with a 'tribal' mindset tend to imagine. Such people are liable to say about, for instance, Yugoslavia that it was so ethnically mixed that it was sheer fantasy to think it could ever hold together. Well, to someone with a more liberal mindset like me, the 'differences' in Yugoslavia were trivial to the point of virtual meaninglessness, and I have the same attitude towards the balkans in general (and even beyond it ). Of course, it's difficult to mash together people who speak different languages, but your own India proves that, difficult or not, it's actually possible - despite the tremendous linguistic differences there, for political purposes they're willing to act as one happy pajeet family.

    White women aren’t really dishonest. A greasy Dago has every incentive to cause strife.
     
    I have no idea what that means in relation to the post you were replying to, but it does remind me of one of my favorite dago stories. I was trying to pick up this girl at a bar once, and she called out to some bouncer she knew as he was walking past and said, teasingly, as part of the flirtation:

    Her: This guy's harassing me, can you throw him out?

    Bouncer: [looks me over] He's a dago like me, why should I?

    Her: [trying to say something but bouncer walked off]

    Me: [with a cheeky gleam] Suck. Fucking. Shit.

    That's clearly a pretty steep fall from Jane Austen standards of courtship, and I feel half guilty for acting as an agent of cultural decay myself in this instance (and numerous others like it), but guys are always going to opt for what 'works' in the moment and neglect the longer term cultural corrosion their (our) behavior generates.

    Back to the racial angle though, this was in a small regional city that hadn't seen much in the way of immigration (but which by now could be half pajeet for all I know), so there was virtually an automatic kind of solidarity among greaseballs, that often went beyond the merely humorous (as in my anecdote).

    Replies: @Sher Singh, @Emil Nikola Richard, @Wokechoke

    Correct about the Balkans. I’ve been through the area during the troubles there and after. The differences between these folk amount to nothing from the outsider perspective. Even the Muslim v Catholic v orthodox stuff is absurd. One thing about the Croats is that they look toward Italy and the Serbs look toward Moscow. They could have just as easily remained a Yugo Land though. The war in the area was probably done to prevent Moscow from strangling the Danube river at Belgrade as a min-practice for blocking the Don and Azov later on.

    Looking at the map from a wider perspective perhaps all Western and Central Europe is a Meta Balkan. Pointlessly fractured over trivia.

  344. @Matra
    @silviosilver

    I haven't yet read your links or thought about the argument you attribute to Johnson but I heard/read him claim that because France was able to leave NATO (they only withdrew from its integrated command but still aligned with it) in the 1960s that leaving NATO is a viable option today as if we have the same ruling elites now that we had back then. I can think of many occasions from Canada at the start of the Cuban Missile Crisis to West Germany over the original pipelines to the USSR when NATO countries were able to stand up to the US in ways they can't or won't today. This is not the 60s anymore. Today our elites are completely oriented towards the US (whether voluntarily or not). Today that NATO is actively bringing refugees from North Africa into Europe and I don't see it becoming a structure for any future nationalist governments as long as the US (and UK) are connected with it.

    Anyway, I find a lot of WNist arguments in favour of Ukraine to be disingenuous. Many are just a cover for Eastern European nationalists (Johnson has lots of such connections such as the Macedonian guy who claims it is clear and obvious that Russia sabotaged Nord Stream 2 and who gets upset any time someone is sympathetic to Serbia). Another reason why I think - based on decades of observing American WNists in particular - many of them are really pro-Ukraine is their bizarre fetish for Nazi/Fascist aesthetics. Azov fighting Russians, who sometimes fly the hammer & sickle, is just too much for them to resist. It turns them on.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    There a much more straight explanation.

    Some of the pro Ukraine figures on the racialist right are just adjuncts of the CIA. Not in and of itself a problem Much of the time it’s just that the glowing begins to get a bit obvious. Flamingly obvious.

    This war in Russo-Ukraine really suits American arms dealers and energy giants. It is very bad for Europeans. It’s also easy enough to just support Ukraine and oppose Russia. Makes life lubriciously easy. So easy!

  345. @silviosilver
    @sudden death

    I've been kinda indifferent towards who prevails, at times thinking it would be better if Russia did, other times if Ukraine did. I'm still not really sure. But I must say I've recently been swayed by Greg Johnson's principled approach, as outlined in these two pieces:

    https://counter-currents.com/2022/10/the-ukraine-war-one-last-time/

    https://counter-currents.com/2022/10/questions-on-nato-russia-ukraine/

    The kind of arguments that he has received against that position seem pretty weak to me. If I were to attempt to argue against it, I think I'd begin by questioning the real value of nationalist ethnostates for the purposes of pro-white politics. I would accuse Greg of arguing for ethnostates because that is more expedient - that's where all the rightwing energy is, and he is simply feeding off it - rather than because that is the best for the long-term.

    Greg thinks that with a nationalist structure in place, the nationalist policies will simply need to be refined so that they reflect the interests of the ethnic nation (and those deemed to be racially compatible with it). He ignores the fact the value system of virtually every single formerly white state is vehemently opposed to his preferred policies - many of them are woke liberal to the hilt (certainly all his favorite ones are).

    I would argue that it is better to have a society with strongly conservative attitudes in place, even if for the time being these attitudes relate to religion or culture rather than race, and even if their multiculturalism/multiracialism is of such long standing that it could be framed (even revered) as "traditional," since that still allows the majority group, the preferred in-group (eg Russians in Russia), to speak positively in its own name. I would argue that in time, it would simpler for that in-group to demand firmer recognition of its essential life requirements (including racially exclusive territory) than to attempt to reform a woke liberal polity into a racial nationalist polity. In this respect, if anyone has the territory to spare to accommodate all the various groups that may require it,it's Russia (and the Anglosphere too).

    I keep saying "I would" because I'm not actually convinced of this position. It's just how I would go about refuting Greg, because it addresses the core of his argument, whereas his opponents' arguments as they appear in the comments are frankly moronic, nothing but typical Russia-troll quality.

    (Unfortunately, I'm unable to post this on his site, since he long ago banned me. Even anti-vaxxers are more welcome at this site than I am, sadly.)

    Replies: @Matra, @Wokechoke, @Mikhail

    What happens in Kiev will be sponsored by Hindus like Sunak, who though not public ally associated with opposing Russia, will now own it in a very special way. Right as White Brits get rounded up for protesting energy price hikes and mass migrations.

    The role of the UK in stirring up trouble in Crimea and Azov Sea area is lock stock and two smoking barrels the work of Sunak at this point. A Chancellor of the Exchequer is generally in all the big meetings greenlighting all the major decisions. The pipelines, bridges, sinkings, car bombings are all run through treasury at some point.

    • Replies: @sher singh
    @Wokechoke

    The exchequer should commit political suicide because of your feelings?
    Russia's had every opportunity to win this war yet it doesn't.

    You're angry at a Hindu being PM & that seeth is great.
    It's the same reason I supposed Trump - one side gets to have meltdowns daily.

    :popcorn:

    Replies: @Wokechoke

  346. @Wokechoke
    @silviosilver

    What happens in Kiev will be sponsored by Hindus like Sunak, who though not public ally associated with opposing Russia, will now own it in a very special way. Right as White Brits get rounded up for protesting energy price hikes and mass migrations.

    The role of the UK in stirring up trouble in Crimea and Azov Sea area is lock stock and two smoking barrels the work of Sunak at this point. A Chancellor of the Exchequer is generally in all the big meetings greenlighting all the major decisions. The pipelines, bridges, sinkings, car bombings are all run through treasury at some point.

    Replies: @sher singh

    The exchequer should commit political suicide because of your feelings?
    Russia’s had every opportunity to win this war yet it doesn’t.

    You’re angry at a Hindu being PM & that seeth is great.
    It’s the same reason I supposed Trump – one side gets to have meltdowns daily.

    :popcorn:

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @sher singh

    It’s all very distant. One silver lining is that he can’t survive long. Between supporting the Russia sanctions and being responsible for the inflation of prices his in your face race identity will drive voters back to Labour. And they can just moan about billionaires instead of just admitting they hate foreigners. A perfect foil for Sir Kier.

    Replies: @sher singh, @Sean

  347. sher singh says:
    @Barbarossa
    @sher singh

    I've never smoked. Cigarettes seem unspeakably nasty to me, though pipe tobacco seems quite appealing. I have some serious nostalgia around pipe smoke from a particular person who is gone now. I wouldn't mind taking up a pipe at some point when I'm older, but haven't taken the time to try it.

    I've never tried sailing the Great Lakes. I assume you are talking about in a sailboat, not a motor boat? I have an uncle who has been an avid sailor and has a sailboat at his place in Maine. It's very appealing and I have the notion that if I had a different life I might live by the ocean in an out of the way spot and spend inordinate amounts of time sailing, fishing, and eating seafood.

    Ever sailed the Great Lakes yourself?

    Replies: @sher singh

    Tobacco/smoking is prohibited & we don’t associate with users.

    Sailing/boating w/e we live near 5 inland seas, and people rarely see them all.
    Imagine if there was no border, and you could just hop across the lake to do stuff..

    The Ontario peninsula is a cool place tbh especially the thunderstorms.

    • Replies: @Barbarossa
    @sher singh


    Imagine if there was no border, and you could just hop across the lake to do stuff.
     
    A friend of mine remembers how back in the 40's growing up in Niagara Falls he could just take his bicycle over the bridge into Canada. It was no big deal back then. I actually see that Canada has dropped all it's border Covid BS. I was wondering if I was going to ever be allowed into Canada again.

    I remember being in Toronto in November a few years back and a massive blizzard blew in unexpectedly, so I would imagine that thunderstorms could be well worthwhile. I do a lot of work around the finger lakes and it's similar, though on a much smaller scale, of course. It's neat to watch weather roll in.

    Replies: @silviosilver

  348. @songbird
    @sudden death

    In Sikhism, meals in the past were communal affairs. They made a religious-egalitarian point of eating together, in a large group, as is evidenced by the writings of the gurus.

    Meanwhile modern genetics has proved how different Hindu castes (that have different food taboos) are.

    What was the early history of Jews among other groups in the Middle East? Did they also live among non-pork eaters, and was it a general taboo? It's possible but remember most Jews today are Ashkenazi. They lived among Europeans who ate pork, and IMO, it helps explain why such a small group became so many. Another small reason: probably adaptive to have your butchers all be in the same community, to keep the money in the community too.

    But a pork ban is a great way of getting rid of apostates because pork is hard to resist. Reform Jews (who often eat pork) seem like they are dying out. Not so the Orthodox.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Dmitry, @YetAnotherAnon

    “a pork ban is a great way of getting rid of apostates because pork is hard to resist”

    Absolutely. There’s an old Jewish joke about a priest and a rabbi agreeing to sample the forbidden things allowed in the other religion, where the punchline delivered by the rabbi is “It’s better than pork, isn’t it?”.

    But is it better than a crispy bacon roll with butter and a mug of tea? On a Saturday morning when you feel a trifle fragile after Friday night?

    (surely the pork taboo origin is simple – they eat human faeces. Many an Indian squatting in a field has been rudely barged over by a hungry pig.)

    • LOL: songbird
    • Replies: @songbird
    @YetAnotherAnon

    Heard that in medieval times, pigs that got loose would sometimes eat infants. Maybe, that could also have something to do with the origin of the taboo.

    Replies: @S, @YetAnotherAnon

  349. @sher singh
    @Wokechoke

    The exchequer should commit political suicide because of your feelings?
    Russia's had every opportunity to win this war yet it doesn't.

    You're angry at a Hindu being PM & that seeth is great.
    It's the same reason I supposed Trump - one side gets to have meltdowns daily.

    :popcorn:

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    It’s all very distant. One silver lining is that he can’t survive long. Between supporting the Russia sanctions and being responsible for the inflation of prices his in your face race identity will drive voters back to Labour. And they can just moan about billionaires instead of just admitting they hate foreigners. A perfect foil for Sir Kier.

    • Replies: @sher singh
    @Wokechoke


    It’s all very distant. One silver lining is that he can’t survive long. Between supporting the Russia sanctions and being responsible for the inflation of prices his in your face race identity will drive voters back to Labour. And they can just moan about billionaires instead of just admitting they hate foreigners. A perfect foil for Sir Kier.
     
    I think it's a Trudeau like situation - both don't have to call elections till 2025.
    They can weather out w/e storm comes due to those same factors you mentioned.
    Right now they don't have to appeal to voters, but keep their own cadre in line.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    , @Sean
    @Wokechoke

    It’s all very distant. One silver lining is that he can’t survive long.
     

    Not a chance. Truss was an accountant with the temperament of a particularly reckless lion tamer. For istance asked if she would order press the nuclear because the Tories know they'd all lose their seats by another leader change. Anyway the 'crisis' was in effect a coup by the Bank Of England to get rid of Truss and her Chancellor (who wrote a radical plan for cutting back government spending together in 2012) by publicly announcing to the pension funds the Bank would cease to support the pound in a few days causing the dumping of government bonds and tanking the currency. The figures now almost add up and almost back where it was before the Bank's stratagem, and Sunak will be able to take whatever shortfall he needs for health and welfare from defence; that is the usual procedure these last three decades.

    The Home Secretary who originally proposed sending asylum applicants to Rwanda (stalled in the courts) was the Muslim Pretty Patel. The most interesting part of the Starmer verses PM Rishi Sunak (not shown in any TV news) was where Sunak crushed Starmer by saying that ( the very ethnic Indian looking Christian turned Buddhist) Suella Braverman would be be combating bogus refugees (by sending them to Rwanda), while Starmer's Labour is in favour of "unlimited immigration".

    Sunak has a special advantage on immigration matters; the Rwanda policy was called 'disgusting', such language can hardly be used about Sunak. I thought Starmer looked depressed at the a la Boris way his support for Corbyn was brought up by Sunak. Starmer was reduced to carping about Braverman, who is not only far more ethnic but nurturing and vulnerable looking that the shockingly hard faced smirker Patel (from a Hindu family).

    Replies: @sudden death, @sher singh

  350. @songbird
    @Thulean Friend

    They should have stuck to women of ill repute like Truss and cosmopolitan, r-selected, bastard-spawning mutts like BoJo. It's a mistake to put an obviously alien face on the regime, when so many willing passables would serve.

    Having an Indian PM will only increase the pressure to have a black one. They will need to mix it up - it wouldn't do to have a string of Indian ones , and color-signaling compels them.

    How long before a black PM starts using the word "racist", or before Sunak himself is caught using it? Or before they start lecturing about colonialism?

    Replies: @AnonfromTN, @sher singh, @Coconuts

    How long before a black PM starts using the word “racist”, or before Sunak himself is caught using it? Or before they start lecturing about colonialism?

    After seeing some of the hostile reactions from various British race grifters and racial revolution types I can see the logic behind having him as PM.

    Senior people in the Tory party must know about the demographic issue, more obvious among the younger age groups and it is sort of baked in or inevitable now, so it is better to get out in front of it and reduce the political capital progressives can make out of race issues. This might be better for long political stability. Also he seems likely to be more competent on running the economy than Truss and Kwarteng.

  351. Perhaps sher singh can tell us what is going on in this video from a Toronto suburb.

  352. @A123
    😆 Open Thread Humor 😂

    Open the [MORE] tab for the rest. I am going to try for politics free, but no promises.

    PEACE 😇
    __

    Have I sealed my own fate?

     
    https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi0wEM1K3NuTnjfzPG-JLyfJFpgKNyZMjRdJChTjvpxhPXjma30IexHJdMRNd5d5Szo5mWB1rXR1eoAW_u5owIyYXW_wN89ZLJMN6mT1kJYRreLpOv_RNEkNLkOMCXHHmZSxKV72wYRbcKRaASgEcYfr_eiH0IqVgUzSyZ45U_xBsElSv5d4YMIcUbY5g/w640-h582/201.jpeg
     

    For @Barbarossa

     
    https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh0qo2fPBNtPoPfNUT5W4CdDZdHf9a2M4RgpneVKZ9RV7jsBLVxP8bYXhN3fVyaMRYoUWRZsoXQEjrDGPYrcID3LPCo_4ExwZfXn-xHLP1T-ibQeaD0cgbDsAM_PSrz5ALnpcyZsP_Kzlf7Hga6QLuOQ4NUWsvfw2xz-3mq_KRmoLA51NRtkXPQJFWzsg/s960/16.jpeg



    Did you use enough roof nails?

     
    https://cdn.acidcow.com/uploads/posts/2022-10/1665501751_23.gif

     
    https://i1.wp.com/www.teainthetreetops.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/strax_grenade.gif

     
    https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/cursed_mrna_cocktail.png

     
    https://i.imgur.com/aXj4En9.gif

     
    https://assets.amuniversal.com/30b823a00212013bbe76005056a9545d.jpg

     
    https://i0.wp.com/www.powerlineblog.com/ed-assets/2022/09/IMG_1424.jpg

     
    https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEguoMOl64ogSy9ShFjzvgatSucX3ZKjP2beLTB1dBpLbYoIPWLXbp5bPWPA1oSpsuKT22gfDMMNTB6yQSn9dyVqRof0dxyL-9dAHNTyYb5y6unjuEYAfB7KcljJzpol95Ast0dpwIU8I9g_1RccxG0Sen9ddcWpLpUf8rgMlAlAARmm7wFSIw/s1440/148937383_4164203510276192_2990576195131116780_o.jpg

     
    https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiLKCEXZFN69NlXctmopwMTPmts_QLMQ1Yyj_V9S3gjhmEDXNeI3QXaBaf0BbdHtK-R6QtaixANEstGzijyea4bDA6nyIzwQj3uQm39XYAY52H_07a3vEIxHkeOARs51Zk6Y29NtTh5-WB9mGfUX6PzwXtfB_6WEn-0rVwSbHmOOGljhYYZag/s550/tn_10996.jpg

     
    https://i0.wp.com/www.powerlineblog.com/ed-assets/2022/08/download-5-3.jpg

     
    https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEimgzHcpq8bArGL6hhgtL4MSGLa_ko-aX2uh1_48jOOld9FwnZ3YthZ0gVo1V-ZB_Z6VAZMVViijn3TLPdiXoPd_k7aoIMal71wz3NABx9UEqO3sRJOnt3tMyXY371W2aD5LFUGm-prR1m0poBhPXA20aBqLSf3HhamgakWWrLJfXZbxKABQj_zQqjVPA/s881/2.jpeg

    Replies: @Barbarossa

    LOL, I tell my kids that they are marshmallow farms all the time. They don’t believe it but it’s an obligatory joke. A farmer near us used black and white wrap so each bale was both colors, so I threw in a joke in my best Southern accent about “darn miscegenated bales”.

    • Replies: @A123
    @Barbarossa

    Leave bales out near sheep (or goats).

     
    https://media.giphy.com/media/L1YUsjuLcLFNm/200.gif
     


    As a serious question... Why do they leave wrapped bales scattered about the field?

    A small bale is 500+ lbs. Large ones could be double or triple that. It cannot be easy to move them without punching holes in the plastic. Isn't it essential to keep air out? Once O₂ is no longer available, most of the things that would destroy the hay can no longer grow.

    To me (a non-farmer) it seems like it would easier to move the bales to a wrapping & storage pad. With advanced tractor skills and a mild grade angle, the bales could roll neatly away from the wrapping machine to their long term home.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @Barbarossa

  353. @Mikel
    @Barbarossa

    I actually sympathize with everything you're saying. I kill my own farm animals almost weekly (only rabbits right now) but I can't imagine not doing it in the most humane way possible. I have tasted aged old cow in the old country though and it's a different level of deep beef taste with amazing tenderness. I'm sure you could get something similar with your steers, there's quite a few videos on how to age beef on YT.

    Replies: @Barbarossa

    I can’t imagine not doing it in the most humane way possible.

    LOL, did you see Sher Singh’s video on comment 327? Besides being a neat piece of swordsmanship that is a really clean way to dispatch an animal! There are Muslims that come from the nearby cities to buy sheep (though not from me) and they like to slit the throat and just let the animal bleed out for halal purposes. I prefer to put a .22 in the head first before slitting the throat as it’s cleaner.

    The milk fed steers that I’ve done are really tender, even generally tough cuts have been cuttable with the side of a fork. I don’t butcher my own beef or pigs, though I do my own sheep. Thanks for the recommendation on the aging, I should try it with the sheep and see how it does.

    On the other end of things, we were given a beef bottom round roast from a local organic grass fed farm and had it for dinner tonight. It was a $14 a lb. roast, but it was tough as nails, even though it was cooked slow with lots of liquid. Definitely not was I’m used to with my own stuff. I know them well so I might ask them what their butcher does for hanging. The flavor of the meat was good, but was so tough I wouldn’t have bought it at bargain basement prices.

    • Replies: @Mikel
    @Barbarossa


    LOL, did you see Sher Singh’s video on comment 327?
     
    Yes, pretty intense. That's not what I would call a humane method of sacrificing an animal. In spite of the skill of the swordsman, that goat must be filled with terror surrounded by a noisy human multitude.

    I prefer to put a .22 in the head
     
    Best method by far (if you know what you're doing). But unfortunately I can't use it. This used to be farmland in the past but it is now zoned as agro-residential so I'm not allowed to discharge even an airgun. Which is a pity, as I have plenty of delicious trespassers all the time: deer, quail, doves,...

    I should try it with the sheep and see how it does.
     
    I'd be careful with that. I've read that sheep meat, unlike beef, needs to be cooked thoroughly and aging is a process of letting raw meat mature in a controlled way for added flavor and tenderness. Regardless of Sher Singh's mythical objections, beef is probably the safest meat you can consume and it's actually best rare imo. I've even seen videos of professional cooks tasting raw aged beef to check its maturity.

    Replies: @sher singh

  354. sher singh says:
    @Wokechoke
    @sher singh

    It’s all very distant. One silver lining is that he can’t survive long. Between supporting the Russia sanctions and being responsible for the inflation of prices his in your face race identity will drive voters back to Labour. And they can just moan about billionaires instead of just admitting they hate foreigners. A perfect foil for Sir Kier.

    Replies: @sher singh, @Sean

    It’s all very distant. One silver lining is that he can’t survive long. Between supporting the Russia sanctions and being responsible for the inflation of prices his in your face race identity will drive voters back to Labour. And they can just moan about billionaires instead of just admitting they hate foreigners. A perfect foil for Sir Kier.

    I think it’s a Trudeau like situation – both don’t have to call elections till 2025.
    They can weather out w/e storm comes due to those same factors you mentioned.
    Right now they don’t have to appeal to voters, but keep their own cadre in line.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @sher singh

    Unlikely to be a wartime kind of leader.

  355. @Barbarossa
    @Mikel


    I can’t imagine not doing it in the most humane way possible.
     
    LOL, did you see Sher Singh's video on comment 327? Besides being a neat piece of swordsmanship that is a really clean way to dispatch an animal! There are Muslims that come from the nearby cities to buy sheep (though not from me) and they like to slit the throat and just let the animal bleed out for halal purposes. I prefer to put a .22 in the head first before slitting the throat as it's cleaner.

    The milk fed steers that I've done are really tender, even generally tough cuts have been cuttable with the side of a fork. I don't butcher my own beef or pigs, though I do my own sheep. Thanks for the recommendation on the aging, I should try it with the sheep and see how it does.

    On the other end of things, we were given a beef bottom round roast from a local organic grass fed farm and had it for dinner tonight. It was a $14 a lb. roast, but it was tough as nails, even though it was cooked slow with lots of liquid. Definitely not was I'm used to with my own stuff. I know them well so I might ask them what their butcher does for hanging. The flavor of the meat was good, but was so tough I wouldn't have bought it at bargain basement prices.

    Replies: @Mikel

    LOL, did you see Sher Singh’s video on comment 327?

    Yes, pretty intense. That’s not what I would call a humane method of sacrificing an animal. In spite of the skill of the swordsman, that goat must be filled with terror surrounded by a noisy human multitude.

    I prefer to put a .22 in the head

    Best method by far (if you know what you’re doing). But unfortunately I can’t use it. This used to be farmland in the past but it is now zoned as agro-residential so I’m not allowed to discharge even an airgun. Which is a pity, as I have plenty of delicious trespassers all the time: deer, quail, doves,…

    I should try it with the sheep and see how it does.

    I’d be careful with that. I’ve read that sheep meat, unlike beef, needs to be cooked thoroughly and aging is a process of letting raw meat mature in a controlled way for added flavor and tenderness. Regardless of Sher Singh’s mythical objections, beef is probably the safest meat you can consume and it’s actually best rare imo. I’ve even seen videos of professional cooks tasting raw aged beef to check its maturity.

    • Replies: @sher singh
    @Mikel


    Regardless of Sher Singh’s mythical objections
     
    You still seem to miss that it's Cassus Belli not a mythical objection.

    You go to war for BLM & LGBT - Aryas protect cows.

    Lol at being scared of Jhatka. Of course you are, it's the penalty for cow slaughter.


    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ

    Replies: @silviosilver, @Mikel

  356. @silviosilver
    @sudden death

    I've been kinda indifferent towards who prevails, at times thinking it would be better if Russia did, other times if Ukraine did. I'm still not really sure. But I must say I've recently been swayed by Greg Johnson's principled approach, as outlined in these two pieces:

    https://counter-currents.com/2022/10/the-ukraine-war-one-last-time/

    https://counter-currents.com/2022/10/questions-on-nato-russia-ukraine/

    The kind of arguments that he has received against that position seem pretty weak to me. If I were to attempt to argue against it, I think I'd begin by questioning the real value of nationalist ethnostates for the purposes of pro-white politics. I would accuse Greg of arguing for ethnostates because that is more expedient - that's where all the rightwing energy is, and he is simply feeding off it - rather than because that is the best for the long-term.

    Greg thinks that with a nationalist structure in place, the nationalist policies will simply need to be refined so that they reflect the interests of the ethnic nation (and those deemed to be racially compatible with it). He ignores the fact the value system of virtually every single formerly white state is vehemently opposed to his preferred policies - many of them are woke liberal to the hilt (certainly all his favorite ones are).

    I would argue that it is better to have a society with strongly conservative attitudes in place, even if for the time being these attitudes relate to religion or culture rather than race, and even if their multiculturalism/multiracialism is of such long standing that it could be framed (even revered) as "traditional," since that still allows the majority group, the preferred in-group (eg Russians in Russia), to speak positively in its own name. I would argue that in time, it would simpler for that in-group to demand firmer recognition of its essential life requirements (including racially exclusive territory) than to attempt to reform a woke liberal polity into a racial nationalist polity. In this respect, if anyone has the territory to spare to accommodate all the various groups that may require it,it's Russia (and the Anglosphere too).

    I keep saying "I would" because I'm not actually convinced of this position. It's just how I would go about refuting Greg, because it addresses the core of his argument, whereas his opponents' arguments as they appear in the comments are frankly moronic, nothing but typical Russia-troll quality.

    (Unfortunately, I'm unable to post this on his site, since he long ago banned me. Even anti-vaxxers are more welcome at this site than I am, sadly.)

    Replies: @Matra, @Wokechoke, @Mikhail

    Latest Douglas Macgregor

    Re: Below Linked Show (scroll down after clicking into link)

    Coherent facts and fact-based comments in line with what I’ve been saying all along. Some follow-up points.

    On the misinformation about Putin and nukes, reference could’ve been made to Liz Truss’ brazen comment about her willingness to use that option. Macgregor astutely notes that Russia has other options besides using nukes, in addition to noting some Kiev regime comments regarding their developing a dirty bomb scenario.

    The Neville Chamberlin appeasement point against Russia brought up by host Frank Morano should be accurately looked at another way. Russia has been faced with appeasing a corrupt, undemocratic and neo-Nazi influenced Kiev regime with blood on its hands going back prior to 2/24/22. Said entity failed to honor the Minsk Protocol it signed as it built up its forces and sought NATO membership.

    As I’ve noted, Russia has shown the willingness to recognize questionably drawn Communist boundaries on the provision that it doesn’t pose a security threat and oppress pro-Russian people, who for centuries have been in the same nation as Russia.

    https://wabcradio.com/episode/col-douglas-macgregor-retired-u-s-army-colonel-10-26-2022/

  357. @sher singh
    @Barbarossa

    Tobacco/smoking is prohibited & we don't associate with users.

    Sailing/boating w/e we live near 5 inland seas, and people rarely see them all.
    Imagine if there was no border, and you could just hop across the lake to do stuff..

    The Ontario peninsula is a cool place tbh especially the thunderstorms.

    Replies: @Barbarossa

    Imagine if there was no border, and you could just hop across the lake to do stuff.

    A friend of mine remembers how back in the 40’s growing up in Niagara Falls he could just take his bicycle over the bridge into Canada. It was no big deal back then. I actually see that Canada has dropped all it’s border Covid BS. I was wondering if I was going to ever be allowed into Canada again.

    I remember being in Toronto in November a few years back and a massive blizzard blew in unexpectedly, so I would imagine that thunderstorms could be well worthwhile. I do a lot of work around the finger lakes and it’s similar, though on a much smaller scale, of course. It’s neat to watch weather roll in.

    • Replies: @silviosilver
    @Barbarossa


    I remember being in Toronto in November a few years back and a massive blizzard blew in unexpectedly, so I would imagine that thunderstorms could be well worthwhile. I do a lot of work around the finger lakes and it’s similar, though on a much smaller scale, of course. It’s neat to watch weather roll in.
     
    Hilarious. The sikh is complotting with the dago to carve up the white man's territory, and whitey mcwhite over here is chatting about the weather.

    Replies: @Barbarossa

  358. sher singh says:

    Diwali party of about 500 mostly Intl students.
    Police called claiming it’s a fight & tell them to go home.
    They do after about an hour & finishing their fireworks.
    NW Toronto – N Etobicoke, Malton, Bramptin is about 1mil ppl & 70% Indian.

    Bandi Chor Diwas Mubarak
    Diwali Diya Vadaiya



    The CBC gets about 1bil from Gov & invests most of it back:

  359. @Mikel
    @Barbarossa


    LOL, did you see Sher Singh’s video on comment 327?
     
    Yes, pretty intense. That's not what I would call a humane method of sacrificing an animal. In spite of the skill of the swordsman, that goat must be filled with terror surrounded by a noisy human multitude.

    I prefer to put a .22 in the head
     
    Best method by far (if you know what you're doing). But unfortunately I can't use it. This used to be farmland in the past but it is now zoned as agro-residential so I'm not allowed to discharge even an airgun. Which is a pity, as I have plenty of delicious trespassers all the time: deer, quail, doves,...

    I should try it with the sheep and see how it does.
     
    I'd be careful with that. I've read that sheep meat, unlike beef, needs to be cooked thoroughly and aging is a process of letting raw meat mature in a controlled way for added flavor and tenderness. Regardless of Sher Singh's mythical objections, beef is probably the safest meat you can consume and it's actually best rare imo. I've even seen videos of professional cooks tasting raw aged beef to check its maturity.

    Replies: @sher singh

    Regardless of Sher Singh’s mythical objections

    You still seem to miss that it’s Cassus Belli not a mythical objection.

    You go to war for BLM & LGBT – Aryas protect cows.

    Lol at being scared of Jhatka. Of course you are, it’s the penalty for cow slaughter.

    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ

    • Replies: @silviosilver
    @sher singh


    You go to war for BLM & LGBT – Aryas protect cows.
     
    That reminds me of another funny story. I had this Jew friend in Melbourne, older guy, but a bit of a party animal. He introduced me to a young hindoo friend (and coworker, I think) of his once - I mention the Jew friend because was always introducing me to a multiracial cast of people; I think he got off on it - and in the course of introductory chit-chat after the hindoo asked me about my background, he said to me, "reassuringly," and in apparent seriousness, "we're Aryans" (meaning he and I). Lol, caught me totally off-guard, I had no idea how to react. I'm pretty sure he was coked up and I thought that might have something to do with the bizarre statement - like even if that's what he actually believed, how socially clueless do you have to be to not know the severe disrepute that term has fallen into? What kind of a reaction did he seriously expect, that I'd say "fuck yeah, we sure are bro"? I think I just smiled and changed the subject. So my question is, is this a thing among hindoos and sikhs, going around calling themselves "Aryans"?

    Toronto politics is now White Lib + Black + Muslim v Sikh, Slav & Med.
     
    Well, I suppose that's a coalition I could live with, as long as the objective is separation, not integration. You guys gotta cool it with the cow stuff though. That shit is really irritating. Get a life or something.

    Btw, what side do the chinks come down on?

    Replies: @Matra, @sher singh

    , @Mikel
    @sher singh


    You still seem to miss that it’s Cassus Belli not a mythical objection.
     
    I was about to reply to your earlier comment about the Basque language but then I thought my reply was going to sound mean and I just decided to let it pass. Who cares about your absurd posts anyway?

    However, you're welcome to visit the Basque Country any time you want and try to interrupt one of the daily steak banquets at a gastronomic society looking like an Indiana Jones movie villain with your turban and your toy sword. Bring a video of how the dozen or two dozen 200 lbs+ diners armed with steak knives receive you please lol

    Btw, how is your crusade against beef consumers in Canada going?

    Replies: @Sher Singh, @Emil Nikola Richard

  360. sher singh says:

    Dussehra – Nanded 2022 from Sikh

    Canada’s High Commissioner in India, Cameron MacKay, when asked a "loaded question" about "Khalistani outfits in Canada" from Sikh

    Diaspora & domestic politics are starting to converge – both White Cons & Hinduvta seeth.
    Toronto politics is now White Lib + Black + Muslim v Sikh, Slav & Med.

    Hindus & White Cons have no street presence so just cry online.
    White Normies side with the latter.

  361. @sher singh
    @Mikel


    Regardless of Sher Singh’s mythical objections
     
    You still seem to miss that it's Cassus Belli not a mythical objection.

    You go to war for BLM & LGBT - Aryas protect cows.

    Lol at being scared of Jhatka. Of course you are, it's the penalty for cow slaughter.


    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ

    Replies: @silviosilver, @Mikel

    You go to war for BLM & LGBT – Aryas protect cows.

    That reminds me of another funny story. I had this Jew friend in Melbourne, older guy, but a bit of a party animal. He introduced me to a young hindoo friend (and coworker, I think) of his once – I mention the Jew friend because was always introducing me to a multiracial cast of people; I think he got off on it – and in the course of introductory chit-chat after the hindoo asked me about my background, he said to me, “reassuringly,” and in apparent seriousness, “we’re Aryans” (meaning he and I). Lol, caught me totally off-guard, I had no idea how to react. I’m pretty sure he was coked up and I thought that might have something to do with the bizarre statement – like even if that’s what he actually believed, how socially clueless do you have to be to not know the severe disrepute that term has fallen into? What kind of a reaction did he seriously expect, that I’d say “fuck yeah, we sure are bro”? I think I just smiled and changed the subject. So my question is, is this a thing among hindoos and sikhs, going around calling themselves “Aryans”?

    Toronto politics is now White Lib + Black + Muslim v Sikh, Slav & Med.

    Well, I suppose that’s a coalition I could live with, as long as the objective is separation, not integration. You guys gotta cool it with the cow stuff though. That shit is really irritating. Get a life or something.

    Btw, what side do the chinks come down on?

    • Replies: @Matra
    @silviosilver

    Btw, what side do the chinks come down on?

    Plenty of them are involved in local politics in various cities and there have been some outspoken leftists among them in decades past, all of them women. However, in general the Chinese are the least political of all the groups. I don't pay much attention to Canadian politics these days so it is possible that has changed in recent years but I see little sign of it. They've always struck me more as the go along to get along types who just want to make money and be left to themselves. Maybe they're more interested in Chinese than Canadian politics.

    , @sher singh
    @silviosilver

    replied to this comment, but it got lost.

    Arya is a Vedic term - Iran means land of Aryans. It's our ethnonym,
    Swastiks are a similar case.

    Cow protection is part of Dharma, atheists are mentally ill.

    https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/10/151014084955.htm

  362. @Barbarossa
    @sher singh


    Imagine if there was no border, and you could just hop across the lake to do stuff.
     
    A friend of mine remembers how back in the 40's growing up in Niagara Falls he could just take his bicycle over the bridge into Canada. It was no big deal back then. I actually see that Canada has dropped all it's border Covid BS. I was wondering if I was going to ever be allowed into Canada again.

    I remember being in Toronto in November a few years back and a massive blizzard blew in unexpectedly, so I would imagine that thunderstorms could be well worthwhile. I do a lot of work around the finger lakes and it's similar, though on a much smaller scale, of course. It's neat to watch weather roll in.

    Replies: @silviosilver

    I remember being in Toronto in November a few years back and a massive blizzard blew in unexpectedly, so I would imagine that thunderstorms could be well worthwhile. I do a lot of work around the finger lakes and it’s similar, though on a much smaller scale, of course. It’s neat to watch weather roll in.

    Hilarious. The sikh is complotting with the dago to carve up the white man’s territory, and whitey mcwhite over here is chatting about the weather.

    • Replies: @Barbarossa
    @silviosilver

    To be honest, I'm more sympathetic to Sher Singh's worldview than yours. As you've mentioned with your story with the bouncer and the girl you were hitting on, you'll act in an expedient way which only adds to societal breakdown. Though a racialist, you seem to be a liberal at heart.

    Extreme attitudes and measures are needed to resist the real existential threats of multicultural hyper-individualistic liberalism. The first of these measures is the cultivation of a sense of honor and the application of that in your community. If you want different social norms you'll have to be the one to model it, since no one else will do it for you. It can spread from there, which is why tribalism is far superior and meaningful, especially in this age, than racialism.

    Naturally enough, Sher Singh enjoys trolling everyone on here with Sikh maximalism, but behind the trolling is a valid question; what are you willing to die or be killed for? If the real answer is nothing, then perhaps it's time to examine why that is the case. This doesn't mean that honor is primarily about killing or being killed, but questions like this are a gauge of seriousness. If you have no principles that you are willing to die for, then you only have empty preferences, not ethics or honor. Sadly, there is no future there.

    If someday (though I seriously doubt it) a bunch of Sikhs try to take over my corner of the world, they'll probably find stiffer resistance than from some exurb Canadian wimplings, but hey then again, maybe facing armed subjugation would teach people to care about something serious. It may be incomprehensible to people so jaded, but Sikhs, Muslims, Amish etc. have actual beliefs that they take seriously enough to die for. Absent that level of commitment it's all just empty materialism.

    So yeah, I don't mind discussing the weather.

    Replies: @Thulean Friend, @Emil Nikola Richard, @Mikel

  363. @sher singh
    @Mikel


    Regardless of Sher Singh’s mythical objections
     
    You still seem to miss that it's Cassus Belli not a mythical objection.

    You go to war for BLM & LGBT - Aryas protect cows.

    Lol at being scared of Jhatka. Of course you are, it's the penalty for cow slaughter.


    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ

    Replies: @silviosilver, @Mikel

    You still seem to miss that it’s Cassus Belli not a mythical objection.

    I was about to reply to your earlier comment about the Basque language but then I thought my reply was going to sound mean and I just decided to let it pass. Who cares about your absurd posts anyway?

    However, you’re welcome to visit the Basque Country any time you want and try to interrupt one of the daily steak banquets at a gastronomic society looking like an Indiana Jones movie villain with your turban and your toy sword. Bring a video of how the dozen or two dozen 200 lbs+ diners armed with steak knives receive you please lol

    Btw, how is your crusade against beef consumers in Canada going?

    • Replies: @Sher Singh
    @Mikel

    Per capita beef consumption is down over 50% from the 70s since chicken got cheap.
    Lol gastronomic society, lit gay.. Women are meant to cook.

    Toy sword that you're scared of - calling Jhatka inhumane.
    Economic collapse, race replacement, violence are all valid paths to cow protection
    The final push only has to come after you're fully broken.
    ---

    "Absurd posts" by an empty materialist who lost all of Europe to Aryas.

    , @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Mikel

    Do you know what they call a quarter pounder in Bombay?

  364. White Cons have no street presence so just cry online

    They genuinely believe in democracy and put their trust in the country’s institutions, which is incredibly naive and complacent.

    It wasn’t always this way. Through organizations like the Orange Order they once controlled the streets – see the book Toronto, the Belfast of Canada by William J. Smythe or the Christie Pits riot – but then post-war they became middle class, divided between liberal & conservative, and less British & more American thanks to mass media. Many sold up and moved to the suburbs and small towns where comfortable but largely apolitical lives are led away from the influential centres of power. No need to control such streets. Many assumed that newcomers would assimilate, or just stop coming at some point. This was in part due to assumed shared values with the country’s elites but also due to a kind of smug assumption – so typical of north Europeans – that “our way of life” is not only the best, but universally desired and inevitable, so every immigrant will eventually be just like Canadians of the past. This assumption is not unlike Fukuyama’s End of History theory, currently enjoying a revival. The ongoing Anglo conservative colour blind and non-sectarian appeals to universal patriotism look weak and cringeworthy these days in both Canada and the US.

    • Agree: Sher Singh, Barbarossa
    • Replies: @Sher Singh
    @Matra

    Hindus & White Cons only collapsed in the early 90s post Cold War.
    You could argue why? The state had no need for them w/o an existential rival anymore.

    Modi actually killed a lot of Hindu street power for ex.
    Either way, too many immediate concerns to worry over other groups.

    Mikel, 200lbs isn't big you iberian manlet.
    Fat beef eaters who don't lift is very scary.
    I'm 190cm & 96kg.

    ---
    On a different note had a realization about Religion in the West/Globally.

    Europeans kept hearths alive into the 1800s & used Pagan warcries for centuries.
    However, due to Social + Legal reality being Christian, had no deep understanding.
    Hence, it could be termed 'superstition'.

    Christianity is superstition in Liberal society.
    Islam & Liberalism are the 2 global religions atm.
    Khalsa does its thing on a regional/local context.

    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ

  365. Sher Singh says:
    @Mikel
    @sher singh


    You still seem to miss that it’s Cassus Belli not a mythical objection.
     
    I was about to reply to your earlier comment about the Basque language but then I thought my reply was going to sound mean and I just decided to let it pass. Who cares about your absurd posts anyway?

    However, you're welcome to visit the Basque Country any time you want and try to interrupt one of the daily steak banquets at a gastronomic society looking like an Indiana Jones movie villain with your turban and your toy sword. Bring a video of how the dozen or two dozen 200 lbs+ diners armed with steak knives receive you please lol

    Btw, how is your crusade against beef consumers in Canada going?

    Replies: @Sher Singh, @Emil Nikola Richard

    Per capita beef consumption is down over 50% from the 70s since chicken got cheap.
    Lol gastronomic society, lit gay.. Women are meant to cook.

    Toy sword that you’re scared of – calling Jhatka inhumane.
    Economic collapse, race replacement, violence are all valid paths to cow protection
    The final push only has to come after you’re fully broken.

    “Absurd posts” by an empty materialist who lost all of Europe to Aryas.

  366. @silviosilver
    @sher singh


    You go to war for BLM & LGBT – Aryas protect cows.
     
    That reminds me of another funny story. I had this Jew friend in Melbourne, older guy, but a bit of a party animal. He introduced me to a young hindoo friend (and coworker, I think) of his once - I mention the Jew friend because was always introducing me to a multiracial cast of people; I think he got off on it - and in the course of introductory chit-chat after the hindoo asked me about my background, he said to me, "reassuringly," and in apparent seriousness, "we're Aryans" (meaning he and I). Lol, caught me totally off-guard, I had no idea how to react. I'm pretty sure he was coked up and I thought that might have something to do with the bizarre statement - like even if that's what he actually believed, how socially clueless do you have to be to not know the severe disrepute that term has fallen into? What kind of a reaction did he seriously expect, that I'd say "fuck yeah, we sure are bro"? I think I just smiled and changed the subject. So my question is, is this a thing among hindoos and sikhs, going around calling themselves "Aryans"?

    Toronto politics is now White Lib + Black + Muslim v Sikh, Slav & Med.
     
    Well, I suppose that's a coalition I could live with, as long as the objective is separation, not integration. You guys gotta cool it with the cow stuff though. That shit is really irritating. Get a life or something.

    Btw, what side do the chinks come down on?

    Replies: @Matra, @sher singh

    Btw, what side do the chinks come down on?

    Plenty of them are involved in local politics in various cities and there have been some outspoken leftists among them in decades past, all of them women. However, in general the Chinese are the least political of all the groups. I don’t pay much attention to Canadian politics these days so it is possible that has changed in recent years but I see little sign of it. They’ve always struck me more as the go along to get along types who just want to make money and be left to themselves. Maybe they’re more interested in Chinese than Canadian politics.

  367. Sher Singh says:
    @Matra
    White Cons have no street presence so just cry online

    They genuinely believe in democracy and put their trust in the country's institutions, which is incredibly naive and complacent.

    It wasn't always this way. Through organizations like the Orange Order they once controlled the streets - see the book Toronto, the Belfast of Canada by William J. Smythe or the Christie Pits riot - but then post-war they became middle class, divided between liberal & conservative, and less British & more American thanks to mass media. Many sold up and moved to the suburbs and small towns where comfortable but largely apolitical lives are led away from the influential centres of power. No need to control such streets. Many assumed that newcomers would assimilate, or just stop coming at some point. This was in part due to assumed shared values with the country's elites but also due to a kind of smug assumption - so typical of north Europeans - that "our way of life" is not only the best, but universally desired and inevitable, so every immigrant will eventually be just like Canadians of the past. This assumption is not unlike Fukuyama's End of History theory, currently enjoying a revival. The ongoing Anglo conservative colour blind and non-sectarian appeals to universal patriotism look weak and cringeworthy these days in both Canada and the US.

    Replies: @Sher Singh

    Hindus & White Cons only collapsed in the early 90s post Cold War.
    You could argue why? The state had no need for them w/o an existential rival anymore.

    Modi actually killed a lot of Hindu street power for ex.
    Either way, too many immediate concerns to worry over other groups.

    Mikel, 200lbs isn’t big you iberian manlet.
    Fat beef eaters who don’t lift is very scary.
    I’m 190cm & 96kg.


    On a different note had a realization about Religion in the West/Globally.

    Europeans kept hearths alive into the 1800s & used Pagan warcries for centuries.
    However, due to Social + Legal reality being Christian, had no deep understanding.
    Hence, it could be termed ‘superstition’.

    Christianity is superstition in Liberal society.
    Islam & Liberalism are the 2 global religions atm.
    Khalsa does its thing on a regional/local context.

    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ

  368. lost all of Europe to Aryas

    That was millennia ago. Nobody cares except for some of the most un-Aryan looking people on the planet like you.

    All I know about those distant events is that eventually our women made the fearsome invaders switch their language to our own and adopt our customs, among which was beef consumption. Good luck trying to eradicate an ancestral tradition depicted in our earliest cave art paintings.

    • Replies: @Sher Singh
    @Mikel


    The Basque Country has a population of approximately 3 million as of early 2006.

    The population density, at about 140/km² (360/sq. mile) is above average for both Spain and France, but the distribution of the population is fairly unequal, concentrated around the main cities. A third of the population is concentrated in the Greater Bilbao metropolitan area
     

    A significant majority of the population of the Basque country live inside the Basque Autonomous Community (about 2,100,000, or 70% of the population) while about 600,000 live in Navarre (20% of the population) and about 300,000 (roughly 10%) in Northern Basque Country.[25]

    José Aranda Aznar writes[26] that 30% of the population in the Basque Country Autonomous Community were born in other regions of Spain and that 40% of the people living in that territory do not have a single Basque parent.
     
    Bilbo Baggins talkin shit.. - I responded to Silvio btw but it hasn't shown up yet.

    https://i0.wp.com/www.eastmojo.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Singhu-border.jpeg

    There's dozens of cases of Sikhs lynching over smoking, beef or blasphemy just this year.
    The man above hands & a foot cut off for disrespecting the Guru - hung publicly till dead.
    He apologized in the end though,

    "Crusade in Canada" - Khalsa HQ is here - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anandpur_Sahib
    All under the Sky belongs to the Khalsa. I'm a resident of Anandpur Sahib.

    ---
    https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1019045310217060372/1035417052212633760/unknown.png

    https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1019045310217060372/1035417378751778846/Jai_Bhagauti.png

    That's the cover for a class presentation a few years back, no push back.

    Anyway, let's see what your women do to the latest crop then Mikel.
     

    most un-Aryan looking people on the planet like you.
     
    Panjabis, Pathans, Tajiks & Iranis/Baloch are Arya ethnically + some Savarna.

    White people of the 19th C pretended to be Brown Aryan.
    White people of the 20th C pretended to be Jap.
    21st C Whites pretend to be Niggers, maybe your women will invent a new culture.

    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ
  369. Sher Singh says:
    @Mikel

    lost all of Europe to Aryas
     
    That was millennia ago. Nobody cares except for some of the most un-Aryan looking people on the planet like you.

    All I know about those distant events is that eventually our women made the fearsome invaders switch their language to our own and adopt our customs, among which was beef consumption. Good luck trying to eradicate an ancestral tradition depicted in our earliest cave art paintings.

    https://i0.wp.com/www.josetteking.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/B-57_Lascaux-17_w.jpg

    Replies: @Sher Singh

    The Basque Country has a population of approximately 3 million as of early 2006.

    The population density, at about 140/km² (360/sq. mile) is above average for both Spain and France, but the distribution of the population is fairly unequal, concentrated around the main cities. A third of the population is concentrated in the Greater Bilbao metropolitan area

    A significant majority of the population of the Basque country live inside the Basque Autonomous Community (about 2,100,000, or 70% of the population) while about 600,000 live in Navarre (20% of the population) and about 300,000 (roughly 10%) in Northern Basque Country.[25]

    José Aranda Aznar writes[26] that 30% of the population in the Basque Country Autonomous Community were born in other regions of Spain and that 40% of the people living in that territory do not have a single Basque parent.

    Bilbo Baggins talkin shit.. – I responded to Silvio btw but it hasn’t shown up yet.

    There’s dozens of cases of Sikhs lynching over smoking, beef or blasphemy just this year.
    The man above hands & a foot cut off for disrespecting the Guru – hung publicly till dead.
    He apologized in the end though,

    “Crusade in Canada” – Khalsa HQ is here – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anandpur_Sahib
    All under the Sky belongs to the Khalsa. I’m a resident of Anandpur Sahib.


    That’s the cover for a class presentation a few years back, no push back.

    Anyway, let’s see what your women do to the latest crop then Mikel.

    most un-Aryan looking people on the planet like you.

    Panjabis, Pathans, Tajiks & Iranis/Baloch are Arya ethnically + some Savarna.

    White people of the 19th C pretended to be Brown Aryan.
    White people of the 20th C pretended to be Jap.
    21st C Whites pretend to be Niggers, maybe your women will invent a new culture.

    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ

  370. @Dmitry
    @Coconuts

    Germany's economy is merging Poland as their lower cost production center while wealthy EU countries transfer hundreds of billions of dollars to Poland for "convergence funding".

    EU's concept is all EU countries should be viewed as a single country, which should increase equality until convergence. So, taxpayers in wealthy countries should transfer to poor countries, until there is "convergence".

    For countries like Poland, there might always be the limit for convergence to their neighbor, as the great companies, engineers and most talented workers, technology, will be mostly German (or another elite country).

    Siemens, Volkswagen, Bosch or Daimler, can outsource factories to Poland for lower costs, but the larger basis of the corporations' success is not the lower cost production area, is more related to the German engineering culture, education and management.

    There could be more space for convergence by the EU, but Poland will perhaps not go to German levels, without undermining much of the reason for the investment in Poland. (I know there is the example of the data from Ireland, but this is a small tax haven for the multinational corporations, the reduction of cost is because of the competitive tax and regulation environment, not from lower economic level).


    continued rise of the Poland and decline of the UK due to Brazilification effects doesn’t seem impossible
     
    UK's "Brazification" is importing the wealthiest people in the world and skilled gastarbeiters, with postcolonial working classes.

    Maybe there are some similar effects, but I don't think it really like the process in Brazil (which imported ordinary people, while the colonial elite became just more wealthy), although it could contribute to increasing inequality and cultural damage.

    This internationalization increasing the net wealth level in the UK and creating more of a clique of the ultra-wealthy internationalized people who are controlling the country, which the new leader is an example, although born in the Kingdom, he is married to a wealthy woman that is directly Indian.

    Maybe not such a future for the local culture, but somehow you can doubt that the wealthy of the world will be establishing in Poland. Although for all kinds of other reasons Poland could rise to 50% of UK's GDP per capita this decade?

    Replies: @Coconuts

    For countries like Poland, there might always be the limit for convergence to their neighbor, as the great companies, engineers and most talented workers, technology, will be mostly German (or another elite country).

    Will Germany continue to be as elite in the future?

    UK’s “Brazification” is importing the wealthiest people in the world and skilled gastarbeiters, with postcolonial working classes.

    Afaik Brazilification is a term from the US, the French have a variant ‘Algerification’, where a country’s social structure comes to resemble that of colonial Algeria, but it has less recognition.

    If the country contains many of the world’s richest, yet its production of wealth each year will only be similar to Poland’s, it seems to be an indication that an Algeria-like social structure is the future. Given the highly wealthy minority are likely to produce a disproportionate portion of this GDP, the low productivity tendency in the rest of the economy and population must be set to continue.

    Many of the gastarbeiters and their families are surely future citizens, and iirc the qualifications needed to become one are now education to age 18, nowadays this is no longer a very high level.

    Maybe not such a future for the local culture, but somehow you can doubt that the wealthy of the world will be establishing in Poland.

    At the moment I am unconvinced of the value of an achievement like this. Isn’t it like making the status of elite country dependent on where comprador elites choose to keep their wealth?

    • Replies: @Dmitry
    @Coconuts


    unconvinced of the value of an achievement like this. Isn’t it like making the status of elite country dependent on where comprador elites
     
    It's not only positive for the locals to receive the world's super wealthy population (for example, increase in property costs), but from the information point of view, there is a healthy symptom for the country, when you see people want to build a life in the country, or store the wealth there, as it depends on the political stability, safety, legal system, property rights.

    Wealthy Chinese are moving their family to Vancouver, partly because they view Canada as a better place to build their life, have family future and property. This is an indicator that Canada has a more stable legal system, more habitable society, as there are more than a hundred thousand millionaires voting to move there.

    We live in a century where, because of technology (transport technology in the most basic level) and economic structure, a significant portion of the world's population will move between countries. So, even while you can dislike the moving of people, globalization that will only increase this century, the regions people move is showing information about real differences in life in these countries with the sense of Francis Galton's "wisdom of crowds".

    Often there is shown to be preference to move to countries with anglosaxon political and legal origin which could be seen as a view of the best long-term stability. Australia, USA, UK, New Zealand, Singapore, Canada, Australia.


    Given the highly wealthy minority are likely to produce a disproportionate portion of this GDP, the low productivity
     
    Well this would sound like "Brazilification", with a wealthy elite increasing their control of the economy.

    But UK is not Brazil, it has many of the most advanced industries, most educated people, talented engineers, scientific success etc. The immigration is not only contrary for this, as many of the world's skilled workers are trying to go there.

    Also the origin of the wealth, of the wealthy immigrants, is not usually from the local ecoomy.


    Will Germany continue to be as elite in the future?
     
    Who knows the future? Maybe Thulean Friend has some more economic knowledge to predict this.

    But for the GDP, the Western European countries are closely matching. The last decade has been stagnation in all these countries. But Germany, France and UK only had stagnation, while Italy and Spain could be declining.

    https://i.imgur.com/H2Y8s3L.jpg

    Replies: @Coconuts

  371. @sher singh
    @Wokechoke


    It’s all very distant. One silver lining is that he can’t survive long. Between supporting the Russia sanctions and being responsible for the inflation of prices his in your face race identity will drive voters back to Labour. And they can just moan about billionaires instead of just admitting they hate foreigners. A perfect foil for Sir Kier.
     
    I think it's a Trudeau like situation - both don't have to call elections till 2025.
    They can weather out w/e storm comes due to those same factors you mentioned.
    Right now they don't have to appeal to voters, but keep their own cadre in line.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    Unlikely to be a wartime kind of leader.

  372. @Dmitry
    @AP


    most of the settlers have been Hong
     
    The report says wealthy immigrants in Vancouver are mainland Chinese, connected to the political elite (Chinese Communist Party).

    They discuss the poor Chinese who had been the population in Vancouver before the 2000s, which have not much connection to the new wealthy immigrants. https://youtu.be/IZs2i3Bpxx4?t=360.

    This is like wealthy Chinese in Europe. Children of China's political elite are always moving hundreds of billions of dollars to the West, which reminds of the last twenty years Russia. In Russia, the main purpose of ruling class of the last decades has been moving to the West, this is the reason to be ruling class, but China's ruling class also has a few of these aspects.


    connected relatives of Chinese Communist Party officials are involved in high level speculation also.

     

    It's not speculation, they will be quietly moving money to the West, in order to move the money (not to increase the money).

    Wealthy people in Russia are living by moving money to the West this century. The main purpose has not been to multiply the money in the West, it is to move it into the West.


    you would not confuse Lviv or Vynnytsia with Zambia or Sierra Leone

     

    Creating an open borders system with Ukraine, is not a light medicine for the wealthy countries. Perceptions of corruption can be equal, but likely Ukraine will have a more powerful mafia than Zambia or Sierra Leone and Ukraine's costs for the EU could potentially be vast - you only need to see how much money Poland has pulled from Europe.

    latter’s only real advantage is higher income and related to that better
     
    Better income, more work/life balance, better services, better education, better environment (Poland has the most polluted air in Europe), better healthcare, etc. I.e. objective indicators.

    per capita Poland is far from being the biggest receiver.

     

    Poland is the greatest receiver of EU money in the net terms, which is the relevant one as we are talking about the country.

    Western Europe. There is nothing shameful about eastern Europeans diverting some money to other Europeans
     
    The taxpayers who are paying for Eastern Europe are not Eastern Europeans, they are the Western Europeans from the net positive countries.

    If I were a German I would rather spend money upgrading a bus system in some Polish city
     
    I would prefer spend the money upgrading a bus system in a German city.

    building houses for Syrian settlers in my city.
     
    You can be so critical of Syrians, but it's not like the postsoviet space is recently appearing more in the civilized world and European values. If I remember Syrians were only cutting off heads, not boiling them.

    Replies: @AP

    The report says wealthy immigrants in Vancouver are mainland Chinese

    Maybe the recent ones and the super-rich, but the Chinese masses in Vancouver are mostly from Hong Kong (and I would add Taiwan).

    Incoming mainland Chinese started to outnumber incoming Hong Kongers in the mid 2000s but most of the Chinese in Vancouver have non-mainland origins (mostly Hong Kong, also Taiwan) due to the massive head start in immigration in the 1980s and 1990s.

    There is nothing shameful about eastern Europeans diverting some money to other Europeans

    The taxpayers who are paying for Eastern Europe are not Eastern Europeans, they are the Western Europeans

    Yes. And these same taxpayers pay to settle their own homelands with non-Europeans. It is good when Eastern Europeans get some of that money diverted to help other Europeans, instead of it all being used to fund their western cousins’ own replacement.

    You can be so critical of Syrians, but it’s not like the postsoviet space is recently appearing more in the civilized world and European values. If I remember Syrians were only cutting off heads, not boiling them

    You have a funny tendency to find some weird abnormal phenomenon and make broad and false conclusions about it. Such as the utterly marginal “Mormon” polygamists, and now some Ukrainian soldier who boiled a Russian soldier’s head.

    What general conclusion will you make about the culture of the western EU, based on the case of the German cannibal? He found that the person tastes like pork.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/dec/04/germany.lukeharding

    • Replies: @Dmitry
    @AP


    most of the Chinese in Vancouver have non-mainland origins (mostly Hong Kong, also Taiwan
     
    Wealthy immigrants in Vancouver of the last twenty years, are mainly from mainland China. You were saying they are not "Sovok" (to relate your interest in the Cold War and dislike of the Soviet Union). But as I said in the first reply, these wealthy immigrants that flood Vancouver are mostly mainland Chinese, often children of political elite, closer than most Chinese to Communist Party. Skyscrapers of Vancouver are built with the money which is not far from China's Communist Party.

    It is good when Eastern Europeans get some of that money diverted to help other Europeans, instead of it all being used to fund their western cousins’ own

     

    There are strange claims in this paragraph. Money from Western European taxpayers for convergence funding to the Warsaw Pact, is their taxpayer money, which would be used to pay for schools, transport and hospitals in their country.

    This is the money of the Western European taxpayer. It's not all money which is going to be used as "immigration funding for Syrians", unless you will claim this is the main part of the government budget.

    You could say you prefer Western European taxpayers should use their money to fund someone in Warsaw Pact region than from Syria. But your idea that the opportunity cost for the EU's convergence transfers is "funding Syrians" is sophistry. The Western European taxpayers' money would be used in their country, to build infrastructure and other public spending, which is instead used to fund Eastern Europe.

    From self-interest of Western European taxpayer, it would possibly be more optimal to spend in your own country, than to give your money to Warsaw Pact countries like Poland and Hungary, which most Europeans will never even visit as a tourist.

    If Western Europeans want to give money to another country, it would be less controversial as a private choice. If they want to give money to Poles or Hungarians, then there they can donate their personal income. But the use of public tax money to fund convergence of foreign countries is controversial and it is a reason Boris Johnson has public support to remove UK from the EU.

    At the beginning of the discussion, you were saying it is a good thing about Poland, they in a "beggar position" receiving money from Western Europe.

    EU money has been good for Poland, so it is rational for Poles to want the EU's money. But while it is rational to want to receive the foreigners' money, I don't see how it's an area of pride or indicator of the national virtue to receive foreigners money.


    have a funny tendency to find some weird abnormal phenomenon and make broad and false conclusions about it. Such as the utterly marginal “Mormon” polygamists, and now some Ukrainian soldier who boiled a Russian soldier’s head.

     

    Nobody is generalizing from Ukrainian head boiling. Average Ukrainians are not boiling heads, average Syrians are not cutting off heads either. Syrians and Ukrainians are two examples of people who are victims, living in a dysfunctional and dangerous place, where head cutting and boiling can exist as an extreme example of violence that is happening in the local tribal conflicts.

    You were writing a bit like the Syrian immigrants are somehow antonym to Eastern Europe. Sure, postsoviet space is a different world than the Warsaw Pact. But postsoviet space is nowadays as violent as the Middle East and a lot of Eastern Europe is in postsoviet space, not Warsaw Pact region.

    There is nothing marginal to say Ukrainian reality is not so more civilized than origin of the most of the other immigrants in Europe, whether Syria, Middle East, Latin America.

    Ukraine is between Zambia and Sierra Leone in corruption ratings. The economic development level is the same as North Africa. The topic of violence. In Israel-Arab conflict, maybe around 50,000 people have been killed in 100 years. In Ukraine, the same number killed in 8 months. Ukraine is more violent than some of the most famous Middle East warzones. In other rankings of civilian violence also higher during peacetime than many Middle Eastern countries.

    For Western Europeans, to have open borders with the Russian empire/postsoviet space, is not such a nonscary topic, that contrasts with accepting refugees from Syria. It is not like opening borders to Japan, New Zealand or Australia.

    Postsoviet Eastern Europe is including a warzone, which even in the most optimistic scenario will have significant long-term costs for Western European taxpayers.

    There are Baltic states which have been successful EU members, but even they are exporting a lot of the organized crime in Europe. Baltic states are also small and had been more developed for centuries already. And then "successful" countries like Poland, have still pulled hundreds of billions of dollars of public money from the Western European countries, which they could have benefited more if the money was expended in their own country than in foreigners' country.


    What general conclusion will you make about the culture of the western EU, based on the case of the German cannibal? He found that the person tastes like pork.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/dec/04/germany.lukeharding
     

    Lol we know, "no one who speaks German could be an evil man".

    Replies: @LatW, @sudden death

  373. @Mikel
    @sher singh


    You still seem to miss that it’s Cassus Belli not a mythical objection.
     
    I was about to reply to your earlier comment about the Basque language but then I thought my reply was going to sound mean and I just decided to let it pass. Who cares about your absurd posts anyway?

    However, you're welcome to visit the Basque Country any time you want and try to interrupt one of the daily steak banquets at a gastronomic society looking like an Indiana Jones movie villain with your turban and your toy sword. Bring a video of how the dozen or two dozen 200 lbs+ diners armed with steak knives receive you please lol

    Btw, how is your crusade against beef consumers in Canada going?

    Replies: @Sher Singh, @Emil Nikola Richard

    Do you know what they call a quarter pounder in Bombay?

  374. @YetAnotherAnon
    @songbird

    "a pork ban is a great way of getting rid of apostates because pork is hard to resist"

    Absolutely. There's an old Jewish joke about a priest and a rabbi agreeing to sample the forbidden things allowed in the other religion, where the punchline delivered by the rabbi is "It's better than pork, isn't it?".

    But is it better than a crispy bacon roll with butter and a mug of tea? On a Saturday morning when you feel a trifle fragile after Friday night?


    (surely the pork taboo origin is simple - they eat human faeces. Many an Indian squatting in a field has been rudely barged over by a hungry pig.)

    Replies: @songbird

    Heard that in medieval times, pigs that got loose would sometimes eat infants. Maybe, that could also have something to do with the origin of the taboo.

    • Replies: @S
    @songbird


    Heard that in medieval times, pigs that got loose would sometimes eat infants.
     
    I knew that pigs would eat people, even cannibalize if the opportunity presented itself. I didn't know pigs would eat human wastes. Positively revolting for sure. Kind of makes me wonder about goats who are also infamous for eating just about anything.

    As an aside, a few months back you posted a query about cold cut longevity. I ran into a related article recently (see link below) about the now extinct Steppe Bison. Back in the late 70's in Alaska some gold miners discovered an incredibly well preserved specimen of the same in the permafrost.

    Nicknamed 'Blue Babe,' it's believed to be at least 55,000 years old.

    The scientists, after studying it and preserving it, took a strip of meat off the creature and made a stew out of it.

    They taste wasn't all that hot according to one, 'worse than beef jerky' it was said, despite the stew being liberally seasoned with spices, but they all survived the once in a lifetime culinary experience. :-D

    https://www.ancient-origins.net/sites/default/files/field/image/Blue-Babe.jpg

    https://www.npr.org/2022/08/26/1119353933/bison-blue-babe-preserved-eaten
    , @YetAnotherAnon
    @songbird

    A pig was condemned to be hung for eating a beggar woman's baby.

    https://www.thevintagenews.com/2016/10/21/medieval-animal-trials-in-europe-a-pig-sentenced-to-death-by-hanging-for-murder/?chrome=1


    "One of the most amusing cases of the trial of a domestic animal was that of a sow together with her six pigs at Savignysur-Etang, in Bourgogne, France, in January 1457. The charge against her was murdering and partly devouring an infant.

    The sow was found guilty and sentenced to death by hanging, though her offspring, partly because of their youth and innocence and the fact that their mother had set them a bad example, but chiefly because proof of their complicity was not forthcoming, were pardoned.

    For an animal found guilty, the penalty was dire. The Normandy pig, depicted in the frontispiece of the Evans book, was charged with having torn the face and arms of a baby in its cradle.

    The pig was sentenced to be “mangled and maimed in the head forelegs”, and then dressed up in a jacket and breeches to be hung from a gallows in the market square."

     

    An English songwriter, Bill Caddick, wrote "Poor Pig" about a pig-hanging.
  375. Former head of Worldbank Robert Zoellick (German Lutheran from Chicago, not Jewish) makes the case to use Russia’s frozen assets to fix the damage caused by Russia and rebuild Ukraine:

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/russian-cash-can-keep-kyiv-alive-putin-war-of-aggression-frozen-reserves-group-of-seven-negotiations-europe-11666790591

    The U.S. should deploy its best asymmetrical weapon: financial power. In cooperation with its G-7 allies, the U.S. should begin the process under the international law of transferring the more than $300 billion in frozen Russian reserves to Ukraine and other afflicted countries as compensation for Mr. Putin’s aggression.

    Various scholars, such as University of Virginia professor Philip Zelikow and Anton Moiseienko of Australian National University, have mapped out how this may work in practice. As Messrs. Zelikow and Moiseienko identify, the United Nations General Assembly recognized in 2002 the International Law Commission’s Articles on the Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts.

    In combination with several U.N. resolutions and a ruling from the International Court of Justice that have found that Russia has waged a war of aggression, those articles establish the international legal basis for transferring Russia’s reserves to Ukraine. In doing so, the U.S. and allied countries wouldn’t be taking Russian reserves for themselves; they would transfer them to an international fund for compensation.

    [MORE]

    The U.S. should also propose to the U.N. that frozen Russian reserves could finance a U.N. claims commission to compensate low-income countries victimized by Russia’s shock to food supplies. There’s precedent for such a decision. After Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait in 1990, a U.N. commission awarded more than $50 billion to more than a million claimants, including funds to Kuwait, Iran, Jordan and Saudi Arabia for environmental claims.

    Sen. James Risch (R., Idaho), ranking member of the Foreign Relations Committee, has been working with colleagues of both parties on legislation to authorize the transfer. After granting almost $60 billion for Ukraine, Congress and the public can reasonably ask why the U.S. shouldn’t transfer Russian money to Ukraine.

    Mr. Putin has violated fundamental international rules and endangered the security of all nations. He’s sought not only to overrun a neighbor but to annex its occupied lands. He has threatened the use of nuclear weapons, not as a deterrent, but as an offensive weapon in a war of conquest. His war has cost poor countries the ability to feed the hungry by disrupting the grain trade.

    Some Western policy makers are likely to have reservations about the approach. Some may worry, for example, that Russia will retaliate by seizing foreign assets. But it has already done so. If Russia turns to sabotage, it should be forced to pay.

    Others may argue that a transfer of Russian reserves risks confidence in the U.S. dollar. But countries hold dollar reserves for reasons of macroeconomic stability, not so they can invade neighbors. China may worry about holding dollar reserves, but Beijing would already substitute other reserves if it could. Its turn toward self-sufficiency and market controls won’t help it create an alternative reserve currency. China and other countries hold dollars because they sell more to the U.S. than they buy. If they dump dollars, they will shrink their sales and economies.

    A transfer of Russian reserves respects international law. It also represents a potential item in negotiations to end the war. If Mr. Putin reaches a settlement, Moscow may be able to recover some of its reserves.

    The U.S. needs to reset the strategic chessboard. Washington can change the terms of battle by using its strongest economic weapon. By relying on international law, the U.S. would also reinforce the rules-based order that Russia wants to destroy. That would achieve justice as well as peace.

    • LOL: Mikhail
  376. @Barbarossa
    @A123

    LOL, I tell my kids that they are marshmallow farms all the time. They don't believe it but it's an obligatory joke. A farmer near us used black and white wrap so each bale was both colors, so I threw in a joke in my best Southern accent about "darn miscegenated bales".

    Replies: @A123

    Leave bales out near sheep (or goats).

     

     

    As a serious question… Why do they leave wrapped bales scattered about the field?

    A small bale is 500+ lbs. Large ones could be double or triple that. It cannot be easy to move them without punching holes in the plastic. Isn’t it essential to keep air out? Once O₂ is no longer available, most of the things that would destroy the hay can no longer grow.

    To me (a non-farmer) it seems like it would easier to move the bales to a wrapping & storage pad. With advanced tractor skills and a mild grade angle, the bales could roll neatly away from the wrapping machine to their long term home.

    PEACE 😇

    • Replies: @Barbarossa
    @A123

    There is a claw tractor attachment for picking up wrapped bales without punching holes. Silage bales are wet and ferment in the wrap and can be 1000lb.+. Dry round bales are a lot lighter.

    I use all square bales since they are easier for me logistically and I don't have large volumes of animals.

    Replies: @A123

  377. @silviosilver
    @sher singh


    You go to war for BLM & LGBT – Aryas protect cows.
     
    That reminds me of another funny story. I had this Jew friend in Melbourne, older guy, but a bit of a party animal. He introduced me to a young hindoo friend (and coworker, I think) of his once - I mention the Jew friend because was always introducing me to a multiracial cast of people; I think he got off on it - and in the course of introductory chit-chat after the hindoo asked me about my background, he said to me, "reassuringly," and in apparent seriousness, "we're Aryans" (meaning he and I). Lol, caught me totally off-guard, I had no idea how to react. I'm pretty sure he was coked up and I thought that might have something to do with the bizarre statement - like even if that's what he actually believed, how socially clueless do you have to be to not know the severe disrepute that term has fallen into? What kind of a reaction did he seriously expect, that I'd say "fuck yeah, we sure are bro"? I think I just smiled and changed the subject. So my question is, is this a thing among hindoos and sikhs, going around calling themselves "Aryans"?

    Toronto politics is now White Lib + Black + Muslim v Sikh, Slav & Med.
     
    Well, I suppose that's a coalition I could live with, as long as the objective is separation, not integration. You guys gotta cool it with the cow stuff though. That shit is really irritating. Get a life or something.

    Btw, what side do the chinks come down on?

    Replies: @Matra, @sher singh

    replied to this comment, but it got lost.

    Arya is a Vedic term – Iran means land of Aryans. It’s our ethnonym,
    Swastiks are a similar case.

    Cow protection is part of Dharma, atheists are mentally ill.

    https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/10/151014084955.htm

  378. @Wokechoke
    @sher singh

    It’s all very distant. One silver lining is that he can’t survive long. Between supporting the Russia sanctions and being responsible for the inflation of prices his in your face race identity will drive voters back to Labour. And they can just moan about billionaires instead of just admitting they hate foreigners. A perfect foil for Sir Kier.

    Replies: @sher singh, @Sean

    It’s all very distant. One silver lining is that he can’t survive long.

    Not a chance. Truss was an accountant with the temperament of a particularly reckless lion tamer. For istance asked if she would order press the nuclear because the Tories know they’d all lose their seats by another leader change. Anyway the ‘crisis’ was in effect a coup by the Bank Of England to get rid of Truss and her Chancellor (who wrote a radical plan for cutting back government spending together in 2012) by publicly announcing to the pension funds the Bank would cease to support the pound in a few days causing the dumping of government bonds and tanking the currency. The figures now almost add up and almost back where it was before the Bank’s stratagem, and Sunak will be able to take whatever shortfall he needs for health and welfare from defence; that is the usual procedure these last three decades.

    The Home Secretary who originally proposed sending asylum applicants to Rwanda (stalled in the courts) was the Muslim Pretty Patel. The most interesting part of the Starmer verses PM Rishi Sunak (not shown in any TV news) was where Sunak crushed Starmer by saying that ( the very ethnic Indian looking Christian turned Buddhist) Suella Braverman would be be combating bogus refugees (by sending them to Rwanda), while Starmer’s Labour is in favour of “unlimited immigration”.

    Sunak has a special advantage on immigration matters; the Rwanda policy was called ‘disgusting’, such language can hardly be used about Sunak. I thought Starmer looked depressed at the a la Boris way his support for Corbyn was brought up by Sunak. Starmer was reduced to carping about Braverman, who is not only far more ethnic but nurturing and vulnerable looking that the shockingly hard faced smirker Patel (from a Hindu family).

    • Replies: @sudden death
    @Sean


    Muslim Pretty Patel
     

    Patel (from a Hindu family).
     
    allegedly Muslim from a Hindu family, lol

    hopefully just a typo, but you never know these days when Soros seriously becomes a Muslim too for someone out there;)

    Replies: @A123, @Sean

    , @sher singh
    @Sean


    Sunak has a special advantage on immigration matters; the Rwanda policy was called ‘disgusting’, such language can hardly be used about Sunak. I thought Starmer looked depressed at the a la Boris way his support for Corbyn was brought up by Sunak. Starmer was reduced to carping about Braverman, who is not only far more ethnic but nurturing and vulnerable looking that the shockingly hard faced smirker Patel (from a Hindu family).
     
    Nope, there's a caste supremacy/Brahmanical fascism narrative at the ready.
    Open Hindu identity can be attacked from a Leftist POV, but they do so selectively.

    The West started gun control AFTER post-cold war mass immigration.
    The rise of Hindus to top positions has a similar counter-point in Hinduvta bashing.

    Replies: @Sean

  379. @Sean
    @Wokechoke

    It’s all very distant. One silver lining is that he can’t survive long.
     

    Not a chance. Truss was an accountant with the temperament of a particularly reckless lion tamer. For istance asked if she would order press the nuclear because the Tories know they'd all lose their seats by another leader change. Anyway the 'crisis' was in effect a coup by the Bank Of England to get rid of Truss and her Chancellor (who wrote a radical plan for cutting back government spending together in 2012) by publicly announcing to the pension funds the Bank would cease to support the pound in a few days causing the dumping of government bonds and tanking the currency. The figures now almost add up and almost back where it was before the Bank's stratagem, and Sunak will be able to take whatever shortfall he needs for health and welfare from defence; that is the usual procedure these last three decades.

    The Home Secretary who originally proposed sending asylum applicants to Rwanda (stalled in the courts) was the Muslim Pretty Patel. The most interesting part of the Starmer verses PM Rishi Sunak (not shown in any TV news) was where Sunak crushed Starmer by saying that ( the very ethnic Indian looking Christian turned Buddhist) Suella Braverman would be be combating bogus refugees (by sending them to Rwanda), while Starmer's Labour is in favour of "unlimited immigration".

    Sunak has a special advantage on immigration matters; the Rwanda policy was called 'disgusting', such language can hardly be used about Sunak. I thought Starmer looked depressed at the a la Boris way his support for Corbyn was brought up by Sunak. Starmer was reduced to carping about Braverman, who is not only far more ethnic but nurturing and vulnerable looking that the shockingly hard faced smirker Patel (from a Hindu family).

    Replies: @sudden death, @sher singh

    Muslim Pretty Patel

    Patel (from a Hindu family).

    allegedly Muslim from a Hindu family, lol

    hopefully just a typo, but you never know these days when Soros seriously becomes a Muslim too for someone out there;)

    • Replies: @A123
    @sudden death


    you never know these days when Soros seriously becomes a Muslim too for someone out there;)
     
    Actions speak loader than words;)

    George IslamoSoros conducts 100% Muslim behaviour;) This includes funding ships of rape-ugees to Judeo-Christian Europe;)

    Can you prove that The IslamoSoros is not a Muslim;) The burden of proof is yours;)

    PEACE 😇

    , @Sean
    @sudden death


    Privileged Patels of Gujarat fight to be given low caste status ... New generation fights unconventional class war, claiming their once affluent caste is now at a disadvantage when jobs are set aside for lower-born Indians
     
    They fled India to escape the rule of the lower orders, which were left behind,
  380. @sudden death
    @Sean


    Muslim Pretty Patel
     

    Patel (from a Hindu family).
     
    allegedly Muslim from a Hindu family, lol

    hopefully just a typo, but you never know these days when Soros seriously becomes a Muslim too for someone out there;)

    Replies: @A123, @Sean

    you never know these days when Soros seriously becomes a Muslim too for someone out there;)

    Actions speak loader than words;)

    George IslamoSoros conducts 100% Muslim behaviour;) This includes funding ships of rape-ugees to Judeo-Christian Europe;)

    Can you prove that The IslamoSoros is not a Muslim;) The burden of proof is yours;)

    PEACE 😇

  381. What will be the fate of Twitter now that Musk is arriving? (1)

    After Elon Musk walked into Twitter HQ yesterday literally carrying a kitchen sink (“let that sink in”) it was widely expected that he was going to start swinging the ax and send three-quarters of the company’s employees to the unemployment line. Why? Because that’s what he said he was going to do. That didn’t wind up happening, or at least not yet. But the ax did indeed swing, taking three heads off of the censorship hydra. CEO Parag Agrawal was the first to get his walking papers, followed by Vijaya Gadde and Sean Edgett, two of the company’s top legal advisors. Surely Agrawal knew he was on the way out and likely already had his things packed. But nobody expects the firings to stop now. (National Review)

    Some conservatives may hold off on tweeting any forbidden thoughts until they are sure that the coast is clear. But I don’t fall into the latter category. Somebody needs to go first and figure out if the reign of the censors has already stopped. Here’s a test tweet that I sent out this morning. If you can see it, then maybe we’re really in the clear or at least getting close to it. If the link is broken, the censors are still scurrying around under the floorboards. [MORE]

    First full day of Elon’s Twitter. Testing… Testing…

    The vaccines don’t stop you from catching COVID.
    Men cannot have babies.
    If you have to show your ID to get on a plane you should show it to vote.
    Joe Biden has obvious cognitive issues.
    (hits “Tweet” and holds breath)

    We will not know for awhile yet, but the initial moves are promising.

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://hotair.com/jazz-shaw/2022/10/28/musks-new-broom-sweeps-clean-on-day-one-will-reinstate-banned-accounts-n506334

    [MORE]

    • Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
    @A123

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11361041/Zuckerberg-told-slash-20-workforce-company-lost-650-BILLION-valuation.html

    Boy is this going to get ugly.

  382. @songbird
    @YetAnotherAnon

    Heard that in medieval times, pigs that got loose would sometimes eat infants. Maybe, that could also have something to do with the origin of the taboo.

    Replies: @S, @YetAnotherAnon

    Heard that in medieval times, pigs that got loose would sometimes eat infants.

    I knew that pigs would eat people, even cannibalize if the opportunity presented itself. I didn’t know pigs would eat human wastes. Positively revolting for sure. Kind of makes me wonder about goats who are also infamous for eating just about anything.

    As an aside, a few months back you posted a query about cold cut longevity. I ran into a related article recently (see link below) about the now extinct Steppe Bison. Back in the late 70’s in Alaska some gold miners discovered an incredibly well preserved specimen of the same in the permafrost.

    Nicknamed ‘Blue Babe,’ it’s believed to be at least 55,000 years old.

    The scientists, after studying it and preserving it, took a strip of meat off the creature and made a stew out of it.

    They taste wasn’t all that hot according to one, ‘worse than beef jerky’ it was said, despite the stew being liberally seasoned with spices, but they all survived the once in a lifetime culinary experience. 😀

    https://www.npr.org/2022/08/26/1119353933/bison-blue-babe-preserved-eaten

    • Thanks: Barbarossa, songbird
  383. @silviosilver
    @Barbarossa


    I remember being in Toronto in November a few years back and a massive blizzard blew in unexpectedly, so I would imagine that thunderstorms could be well worthwhile. I do a lot of work around the finger lakes and it’s similar, though on a much smaller scale, of course. It’s neat to watch weather roll in.
     
    Hilarious. The sikh is complotting with the dago to carve up the white man's territory, and whitey mcwhite over here is chatting about the weather.

    Replies: @Barbarossa

    To be honest, I’m more sympathetic to Sher Singh’s worldview than yours. As you’ve mentioned with your story with the bouncer and the girl you were hitting on, you’ll act in an expedient way which only adds to societal breakdown. Though a racialist, you seem to be a liberal at heart.

    Extreme attitudes and measures are needed to resist the real existential threats of multicultural hyper-individualistic liberalism. The first of these measures is the cultivation of a sense of honor and the application of that in your community. If you want different social norms you’ll have to be the one to model it, since no one else will do it for you. It can spread from there, which is why tribalism is far superior and meaningful, especially in this age, than racialism.

    Naturally enough, Sher Singh enjoys trolling everyone on here with Sikh maximalism, but behind the trolling is a valid question; what are you willing to die or be killed for? If the real answer is nothing, then perhaps it’s time to examine why that is the case. This doesn’t mean that honor is primarily about killing or being killed, but questions like this are a gauge of seriousness. If you have no principles that you are willing to die for, then you only have empty preferences, not ethics or honor. Sadly, there is no future there.

    If someday (though I seriously doubt it) a bunch of Sikhs try to take over my corner of the world, they’ll probably find stiffer resistance than from some exurb Canadian wimplings, but hey then again, maybe facing armed subjugation would teach people to care about something serious. It may be incomprehensible to people so jaded, but Sikhs, Muslims, Amish etc. have actual beliefs that they take seriously enough to die for. Absent that level of commitment it’s all just empty materialism.

    So yeah, I don’t mind discussing the weather.

    • Agree: sher singh
    • Replies: @Thulean Friend
    @Barbarossa


    Naturally enough, Sher Singh enjoys trolling everyone on here with Sikh maximalism, but behind the trolling is a valid question; what are you willing to die or be killed for?
     
    I'd take him more seriously if he wasn't yet another diaspora LARPer sitting thousands of miles away from his historic homeland that he claims to care about. Much like the dregs shouting Khalistani slogans in a Toronto suburb, thinking it will bring national salvation to the decrepit status of their stateless people.

    Authenticity is important and whatever flaws Silvio may or may not have, he is at least internally consistent in his politics. Whites in the Anglosphere have melded into one. In Europe, Eastern Europeans are still separate from Germanics and Nords to a greater extent than they are in Canada, Australia, USA etc. So Silvio's politics is in fact rooted in his place, as he shares a common identity with other whites.


    Sikhs, Muslims, Amish etc. have actual beliefs that they take seriously enough to die for
     
    Do sikhs really? Their emigration rates are sky-high. If they really cared so passionately, you'd think they'd stay and fight for their supposed homeland in Punjab.

    I don't mind people leaving to find a better life. It's a natural human instinct. But moving abroad and then brandishing sectarian flags safely ensconced in Canada or Australia while having no real plans to do the actual hard work to fight for the self-determination of your people simply comes across as pathetic and should be called out as such. People like that do not deserve a homeland and they'll never get one either.

    Frankly, I do not understand your sikhophilia. There are many other worthy people who actually fight hard for their right to national sovereignty. Sikhs aren't one of them.

    I repeat: the only martial spirit they have left is the effort they put in to get a Canadian visa. It's time to accept that fact.

    Replies: @sher singh, @sher singh, @Yahya, @Barbarossa

    , @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Barbarossa

    How many Punjabis have you known in real life?

    I put them above Gypsies but below Albanians myself. On the other hand my sample size is not large and my plan is it ain't ever going to get any bigger.

    Replies: @sher singh, @Barbarossa

    , @Mikel
    @Barbarossa


    Sikhs, Muslims, Amish etc. have actual beliefs that they take seriously enough to die for. Absent that level of commitment it’s all just empty materialism.
     
    I seriously disagree with this point.

    Humanity doesn't need more people willing to die and kill for political or religious issues, it needs to move past that ancestral tradition. I used to think that we were slowly moving in that direction after the end of the Cold War, the expansion of the EU to countries that used to be enemies for centuries and the globalized trade of the past decades but sadly, it was just a period of calm before the storm, as we're now witnessing.

    It may be beyond the capabilities of the human species, absent some future genetic reprogramming, but the problem with continuing to war among ourselves for "beliefs" is that technological progress made us enter a completely new era 77 years ago where the possibility of destroying civilized life on the planet in one of those wars became real. For 40 years we toyed with Armaggedon in a clash between the beliefs in capitalism/democracy versus communism and now we have entered a new era where we are again toying with the same catastrophe for even more trivial beliefs, hardly more consequential than a pissing contest.

    We are probably not capable of destroying our own species in a war yet but, as time progresses, I see no reason why we won't reach that capability so learning to avoid wars between nations, tribes and religious or political groups is more than just preventing the senseless massacres that we have experienced throughout history, it's a necessary condition for the ultimate preservation of our species.

    From this perspective, materialism may not be a very worthy ideal per se but if it leads people in the advanced countries to reject the idea of dying and killing for "beliefs", it may be a positive development.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Sher Singh, @Barbarossa, @silviosilver, @Coconuts

  384. @A123
    @Barbarossa

    Leave bales out near sheep (or goats).

     
    https://media.giphy.com/media/L1YUsjuLcLFNm/200.gif
     


    As a serious question... Why do they leave wrapped bales scattered about the field?

    A small bale is 500+ lbs. Large ones could be double or triple that. It cannot be easy to move them without punching holes in the plastic. Isn't it essential to keep air out? Once O₂ is no longer available, most of the things that would destroy the hay can no longer grow.

    To me (a non-farmer) it seems like it would easier to move the bales to a wrapping & storage pad. With advanced tractor skills and a mild grade angle, the bales could roll neatly away from the wrapping machine to their long term home.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @Barbarossa

    There is a claw tractor attachment for picking up wrapped bales without punching holes. Silage bales are wet and ferment in the wrap and can be 1000lb.+. Dry round bales are a lot lighter.

    I use all square bales since they are easier for me logistically and I don’t have large volumes of animals.

    • Thanks: A123
    • Replies: @A123
    @Barbarossa


    There is a claw tractor attachment for picking up wrapped bales without punching holes. Silage bales are wet and ferment in the wrap and can be 1000 lb+.
     
    Hmmmm.... Bales being sold immediately. The buyer/distributor responsible for pick up and transport directly from the field.

    I can see a viable business case. A distributor could afford an assortment of special tools for wrapped bales, across the weight and size spectrum. They would be using them more or less year round on their storage lot to manage inventory and fulfill orders.

    PEACE 😇
  385. sher singh says:
    @Sean
    @Wokechoke

    It’s all very distant. One silver lining is that he can’t survive long.
     

    Not a chance. Truss was an accountant with the temperament of a particularly reckless lion tamer. For istance asked if she would order press the nuclear because the Tories know they'd all lose their seats by another leader change. Anyway the 'crisis' was in effect a coup by the Bank Of England to get rid of Truss and her Chancellor (who wrote a radical plan for cutting back government spending together in 2012) by publicly announcing to the pension funds the Bank would cease to support the pound in a few days causing the dumping of government bonds and tanking the currency. The figures now almost add up and almost back where it was before the Bank's stratagem, and Sunak will be able to take whatever shortfall he needs for health and welfare from defence; that is the usual procedure these last three decades.

    The Home Secretary who originally proposed sending asylum applicants to Rwanda (stalled in the courts) was the Muslim Pretty Patel. The most interesting part of the Starmer verses PM Rishi Sunak (not shown in any TV news) was where Sunak crushed Starmer by saying that ( the very ethnic Indian looking Christian turned Buddhist) Suella Braverman would be be combating bogus refugees (by sending them to Rwanda), while Starmer's Labour is in favour of "unlimited immigration".

    Sunak has a special advantage on immigration matters; the Rwanda policy was called 'disgusting', such language can hardly be used about Sunak. I thought Starmer looked depressed at the a la Boris way his support for Corbyn was brought up by Sunak. Starmer was reduced to carping about Braverman, who is not only far more ethnic but nurturing and vulnerable looking that the shockingly hard faced smirker Patel (from a Hindu family).

    Replies: @sudden death, @sher singh

    Sunak has a special advantage on immigration matters; the Rwanda policy was called ‘disgusting’, such language can hardly be used about Sunak. I thought Starmer looked depressed at the a la Boris way his support for Corbyn was brought up by Sunak. Starmer was reduced to carping about Braverman, who is not only far more ethnic but nurturing and vulnerable looking that the shockingly hard faced smirker Patel (from a Hindu family).

    Nope, there’s a caste supremacy/Brahmanical fascism narrative at the ready.
    Open Hindu identity can be attacked from a Leftist POV, but they do so selectively.

    The West started gun control AFTER post-cold war mass immigration.
    The rise of Hindus to top positions has a similar counter-point in Hinduvta bashing.

    • Replies: @Sean
    @sher singh


    Nope, there’s a caste supremacy/Brahmanical fascism narrative at the ready.
    Open Hindu identity can be attacked from a Leftist POV, but they do so selectively
     
    Starmer would not dare, he is only comfortable with talking like that about an implicitly white rich elite who are putatively undeserving and owe their position to the advantages that their parents give them. But this is bullcrap "Plomin argues that “schools matter, but they don't make a difference”. He suggests that schools matter because they should serve as the foundation of our literacy and numeracy and because we happen to spend half our childhood in school. Plomin however argues that schools do not make children better."


    Sunak is married to Akshata Murthy, daughter of a Brahmin billionaire; they are not are rare as Dalit billionaires. All genes isn't it. Genetic determinism? Noooo, Superdetermininsm.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ytyjgIyegDI

  386. @Barbarossa
    @A123

    There is a claw tractor attachment for picking up wrapped bales without punching holes. Silage bales are wet and ferment in the wrap and can be 1000lb.+. Dry round bales are a lot lighter.

    I use all square bales since they are easier for me logistically and I don't have large volumes of animals.

    Replies: @A123

    There is a claw tractor attachment for picking up wrapped bales without punching holes. Silage bales are wet and ferment in the wrap and can be 1000 lb+.

    Hmmmm…. Bales being sold immediately. The buyer/distributor responsible for pick up and transport directly from the field.

    I can see a viable business case. A distributor could afford an assortment of special tools for wrapped bales, across the weight and size spectrum. They would be using them more or less year round on their storage lot to manage inventory and fulfill orders.

    PEACE 😇

  387. @Barbarossa
    @silviosilver

    To be honest, I'm more sympathetic to Sher Singh's worldview than yours. As you've mentioned with your story with the bouncer and the girl you were hitting on, you'll act in an expedient way which only adds to societal breakdown. Though a racialist, you seem to be a liberal at heart.

    Extreme attitudes and measures are needed to resist the real existential threats of multicultural hyper-individualistic liberalism. The first of these measures is the cultivation of a sense of honor and the application of that in your community. If you want different social norms you'll have to be the one to model it, since no one else will do it for you. It can spread from there, which is why tribalism is far superior and meaningful, especially in this age, than racialism.

    Naturally enough, Sher Singh enjoys trolling everyone on here with Sikh maximalism, but behind the trolling is a valid question; what are you willing to die or be killed for? If the real answer is nothing, then perhaps it's time to examine why that is the case. This doesn't mean that honor is primarily about killing or being killed, but questions like this are a gauge of seriousness. If you have no principles that you are willing to die for, then you only have empty preferences, not ethics or honor. Sadly, there is no future there.

    If someday (though I seriously doubt it) a bunch of Sikhs try to take over my corner of the world, they'll probably find stiffer resistance than from some exurb Canadian wimplings, but hey then again, maybe facing armed subjugation would teach people to care about something serious. It may be incomprehensible to people so jaded, but Sikhs, Muslims, Amish etc. have actual beliefs that they take seriously enough to die for. Absent that level of commitment it's all just empty materialism.

    So yeah, I don't mind discussing the weather.

    Replies: @Thulean Friend, @Emil Nikola Richard, @Mikel

    Naturally enough, Sher Singh enjoys trolling everyone on here with Sikh maximalism, but behind the trolling is a valid question; what are you willing to die or be killed for?

    I’d take him more seriously if he wasn’t yet another diaspora LARPer sitting thousands of miles away from his historic homeland that he claims to care about. Much like the dregs shouting Khalistani slogans in a Toronto suburb, thinking it will bring national salvation to the decrepit status of their stateless people.

    Authenticity is important and whatever flaws Silvio may or may not have, he is at least internally consistent in his politics. Whites in the Anglosphere have melded into one. In Europe, Eastern Europeans are still separate from Germanics and Nords to a greater extent than they are in Canada, Australia, USA etc. So Silvio’s politics is in fact rooted in his place, as he shares a common identity with other whites.

    Sikhs, Muslims, Amish etc. have actual beliefs that they take seriously enough to die for

    Do sikhs really? Their emigration rates are sky-high. If they really cared so passionately, you’d think they’d stay and fight for their supposed homeland in Punjab.

    I don’t mind people leaving to find a better life. It’s a natural human instinct. But moving abroad and then brandishing sectarian flags safely ensconced in Canada or Australia while having no real plans to do the actual hard work to fight for the self-determination of your people simply comes across as pathetic and should be called out as such. People like that do not deserve a homeland and they’ll never get one either.

    Frankly, I do not understand your sikhophilia. There are many other worthy people who actually fight hard for their right to national sovereignty. Sikhs aren’t one of them.

    I repeat: the only martial spirit they have left is the effort they put in to get a Canadian visa. It’s time to accept that fact.

    • Replies: @sher singh
    @Thulean Friend

    https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/7CF7/production/_85319913_poop_protest.jpg

    , @sher singh
    @Thulean Friend

    https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1034971837366546502/1035657778938777660/lal_kila_26_jan.jpg

    Gangetic + White Lib blood combine to create the worst form of manlet||
    You've shown your hatred of Sikhi during the farmer protests||

    https://www.facebook.com/HeroesInUniform/photos/mustread-story-of-chhotey-veer-little-brother-gurtej-just-23-years-of-age-whose-/575677293133364/

    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ

    , @Yahya
    @Thulean Friend


    Authenticity is important and whatever flaws Silvio may or may not have, he is at least internally consistent in his politics. Whites in the Anglosphere have melded into one. In Europe, Eastern Europeans are still separate from Germanics and Nords to a greater extent than they are in Canada, Australia, USA etc. So Silvio’s politics is in fact rooted in his place, as he shares a common identity with other whites.
     
    Yes but you are forgetting that silviosilver is, by his own admission, a non-white Balkanoid who looks more like a Turk or Arab rather than a Slavic-looking "Eastern European" in a traditional sense. So his identification with whites is more of a "house nigger" type situation than a "common identity" based on racial similarities. Anglos, Germanics and Nords aren't really his people, as I think he'll readily admit, so his constant shilling for whites (and occasional denigration of people racially closer to him) is nothing to be admired, and is quite pathetic actually if you think about it.

    Replies: @Yevardian, @silviosilver

    , @Barbarossa
    @Thulean Friend


    I’d take him more seriously if he wasn’t yet another diaspora LARPer sitting thousands of miles away from his historic homeland that he claims to care about.
     
    Trust me, I've had the same thought and don't discount it. I don't honestly know how seriously to take Sher Singh, since I don't really know him. I'm not really in a position to judge how much of a LARPer he may be, so I leave that aside.

    having no real plans to do the actual hard work to fight for the self-determination of your people simply comes across as pathetic and should be called out as such.

     

    That may be true for all I know. As I've said before, I'm not exactly quaking in my boots waiting for the inevitable Sikh deluge from the Great White North. If they manage to take over Canada or any other place, I'll be duly impressed, I suppose.

    He has a strong trolling component, as we all know, but I find the trolling interesting at times. It asks some interesting questions about modern attitudes and society, which even if framed in insulting ways are worth consideration.

    I personally regard the greatest evil as the relentless homogenization of globalism, so I'm honestly somewhat rooting for any group that resists that.

    Replies: @Sher Singh

  388. BYD will be the first major Chinese car brand to compete worldwide.

    BYD smashes profit record ahead of European push

    Tesla’s main Chinese challenger BYD has shrugged off supply disruptions as well as foreign and domestic rivals to achieve year-on-year earnings growth of 350 per cent, underscoring the rapid rise of one of China’s most formidable industrial conglomerates.

    The Warren Buffett-backed group’s third-quarter net profit of Rmb5.7bn ($786mn) smashed its previous record of Rmb2.8bn set in the second quarter of this year. The results come just as BYD mounts an aggressive campaign to take on European automakers on their home turf.

    BYD is now among a clutch of Chinese companies posing an existential challenge to electric vehicle industry leader Tesla and incumbent auto titans as the world transitions to EVs. The Shenzhen-based company is highly self-sufficient, controlling its local supply chain of minerals and batteries as well as computer chips and other electronics. Rival Tesla is among its battery customers.

    • Replies: @A123
    @Thulean Friend

    I do not know that it will come out that way, but the EU has completely screwed themselves. (1)


    EU lawmakers agreed to set a zero-emissions sales mandate for new cars and vans by 2035. The deal secures a first win for the European Commission as it looks to push through a major package of green laws — and sacrifices one of the Continent's biggest industrial products: the gas-guzzling car engine.

    "The agreement ... sends a strong signal to industry and consumers: Europe is embracing the shift to zero-emission mobility," said EU Green Deal chief Frans Timmermans, following four hours of negotiations.

    In confirming the engine ban, Brussels has swerved senior German politicians, automaker captains and parts of its once all-powerful car industry that had fiercely lobbied against betting solely on battery-electric vehicles as part of efforts to tackle transport emissions.
     

    Decoupling and MAGA Reindustrialization will do much to protect American jobs. However, there is no slack to help Europe on this kind of time frame.

    The only possibility for this reckless EU folly is obtaining raw materials from China. With submissive, locked in, prey, the CCP will suck up the high value parts manufacturing. It will not matter if the badge is a German or Chinese brand.

    Hungary will allow internal combustion emgiene vehicles with Russian (or Serbian) plates to operate freely for a nominal fee. It is not that hard to obtain plates that do not match your primary residence. This option could be used by other EE countries.

    Perhaps the UK will clean up by providing real vehicles to Irland, Spain, and Portugal. Israeli plates in Greece and Cyprus.

    France and Germany have chosen to chosen to impoverish their citizens unless somehow common sense prevails.

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://www.politico.eu/article/how-the-eu-ditched-the-combustion-engine-zero-emissions-green-deal/

    , @Yahya
    @Thulean Friend

    Iirc, you work in finance, so I assume you know a thing or two about stock market investing. I've been on a flurry of activity recently, after seeing the 20-30% decline of stock indices over the past year as an opportunity to scoop up some bargains. I've found 3 investable companies so far, one of which i've been tracking for a year now, waiting for its price to go down below a certain level so as to provide an adequate margin of safety. The other two came to me by chance and random research.

    1) Adidas AG

    A company that needs no introduction. It has a sustainable competitive advantage owing to its formidable brand and global name recognition; as well as 2,500 wide store footprint. People generally do not want to buy shoes from unknown brands or suppliers, so they stick to 3 or 4 main ones like Nike, Puma, Skechers and Adidas. Adidas' competitive advantage is reflected in their fairly respectable 9-12% FCF margin (I prefer to use Free Cash Flow as the key indicator of profitability instead of Net Income; it's more reliable and less prone to fudging, though it does have its limitations). The other major athletic footwear companies throw out less FCF than Adidas, and only Nike achieves more profitably (~15%) owing to its superior marketing and operational efficiency. But that means there's room for improvement on the margins front for Adidas, and in fact one of the key targets outlined by the CEO is to improve the companies' operating margins (though he has failed to do so in his tenure, and will be removed in 2023 from his post, two years earlier than his contract). In 2021 Adidas achieved a solid 34% ROE (according to my calculations, which again uses FCF instead of net income), which is higher than usual for the company, which averaged 19% over the past 7 years. This was due to an increase in margins (and a slight congruent decrease in asset turnover), as well as increased leverage (equity multiplier increased from 2.2 to 3 during the period). I liked the CEO's compensation structure, which decreases his compensation if he fails to achieve certain growth and operating margin metrics. Also liked that they planned to buyback shares in the company over the next several years, which is especially fortuitous given the recent decrease in stock price. One key downside though is that the present CEO seems to be mediocre, though he is on the way out in 2023.

    2) Hennes & Mauritz (H&M) AB

    Another fashion company which saw its stock hammered over the past year, imo putting it in bargain territory. Its decline seems to stem from temporary factors such as supply chain issues, an inventory glut in the fast-fashion industry, China's COVID lockdown, and Russia sanctions which forced it to shut down its stores in that country. Though revenues for the 9 month period of 2022 were roughly comparable to 2021, margins were down by nearly 50% owing to the factors mentioned above. Again I think these are mostly temporary in nature and margins should return to H&M's normalized levels in the near future. The company averaged a solid 33% over the past 7 years, though it too levered its balance sheet to increase its equity multiplier (which nearly doubled from 1.5 to 3) and boost ROE. Top line growth averaged 2.5% over the past 7 years, which is one key downside I took into consideration. Also the CEO seems to be a typical Swedish uber-conformist SJW who spent more time writing about ESG and Diversity & Inclusion than operational efficiency or return on capital in her CEO letter - never a good sign; though perhaps it's too early to tell how she will perform (she only took over in 2020).

    3) Integrated Diagnostic Holdings (IDH)

    This is an Egyptian company that also lists on the London Stock Exchange. The company is run by a female, which is pretty rare in the Arab world, but she seems to be extremely competent judging by her performance. Thankfully she is more interested in delivering a good return for her shareholders rather than diversity and inclusion. She also owns 26.7% of the company, having recently upped her stake in August 2022, always a good sign. Revenues have gone down 15% y-o-y due to loss of COVID testing revenues, but that was already expected and baked into the price. The company continues to expand its branches and number of conventional testing. FCF margins have been excellent over the past three years, averaging in the mid-20s. ROE likewise is stellar, especially considering that leverage is quite low (1.5 EM). Overall this is the stock I expect to perform best over the next 20 years owing to its growth potential and managerial competence. On the other hand, as a company which primarily operates in the Third World, it is liable to political instability and currency devaluations, its two major risks. Its also possible that new technologies upend the industry and change its profitability and economic dynamics. These i've taken into account before investing in IDH.

    Anyhow, feel free to follow me in investing in these companies. I'm not going to mention the price i paid for them, except to say all of them were around 10 P/FCF when I bought them. Obviously if you wish to purchase them, you should do your own research and come to your own conclusions. Also my time horizon is quite long, so I don't care if their price goes down over the next year or two. I think they are highly likely to appreciate in 10 years time. which is how long I plan to keep them (and more if appropriate).

  389. @LatW
    @silviosilver


    I must say it’s interesting the way AP gets off on taunting the very people he is most relying on to aid his precious Ukraine. The extreme butthurt he feels – let’s face it, it’s gotta hurt for a prideful Uke to think his country could soon be outclassed by even the lowly pajeets of hindoostan – makes him say very weird and very spiteful things.
     
    That's not really how a typical Ukrainian (from Ukraine) thinks, though, it's an attitude more in line with middle class or upper middle class SWPLs in the West (I've heard it from them before, too, using almost exactly the same language, "it's a cycle", "it's how history goes", I was dumbfounded, tbh, and when I first heard it what shocked me the most was the ease of the acceptance of these facts on the ground, not to mention I felt deeply offended, this was a rich Scots Irish boomer woman who said this, completely oblivious to her children's and grandchildren's future). It's not how a typical Ukrainian who had been raised in Ukraine would think. Not at all. First, this is not even on their radar right now. Second, if they did think about the replacement, even some of the normies (not to even mention the nationalists) would feel a bit taken aback if they saw what's really going on. They will definitely care if it starts happening in UA. The only question is if they'll have the resources to withstand it.

    It is kind of true though that first they displaced the Natives. It's just that does it really mean that the new settlers would have to be displaced, too? It's an ideological question.

    Replies: @Coconuts, @S

    I’ve heard it from them before, too, using almost exactly the same language, “it’s a cycle”, “it’s how history goes”, I was dumbfounded, tbh, and when I first heard it what shocked me the most was the ease of the acceptance of these facts on the ground…

    They’ve been brainwashed.

    They’ve also been presented with a crazy false dichotomy, ie either willfully accept your murder as a people (ie genocide in the truest sense of that much abused term via crudely and barbarically being ‘mixed’ out of existance) as ‘reparations’, or, you’re a bigot.

    [MORE]

    Guilt and shame have a place, to bring about self correction. It is not, however, to be cynically used/manipulated as a weapon by some to bring about the destruction or suicide of others.

    If one feels reparations of some type (within reason) are in order, sure, but within the context of one living, not dieing. Colonization of one’s own homeland, the accompanying mass murder, rapine, and genocide of one’s own people via ‘mixing’, isn’t reparations, however, but simply destruction. Healthy people (dare it be said normal people) don’t engage in that type of thing, nor do they advocate it for others.

    As for reasonable reparations, can they ever really be paid back? For example, could the Mongolian descendants of Ghengis Khan, or the descendants of the original conquerers of the Islamic Caliphate, ever pay back for their forebear’s murders and enslavement of others?

    However, if reparations in regard to the Anglosphere were to be paid, I’d be tempted to start with the confiscation of the great estates of the descendants of the progressives and their hangers on who ran the North American chattel slave trade from New England, to not only be paid to others, but to a great many of their own Anglo-Saxon people who had to suffer under it.

    Those reparations on their part would be in conjunction with a true abolition of the still on going slavery, wage slavery, ie the early 19th century monetization of chattel slavery and its trade, specifically the so called cheap labor/mass immigration system. Wage slavery is the economic and political basis of the modern progressive Multi-Cultural state, a state which not coincidentally closely parallels the Anglosphere chattel slave holding society it directly evolved from.

    Within the Anglosphere, folks should self identify with those who didn’t own chattel slaves and had to suffer grievously under the system, which was most people. Just as with chattel slavery, wage slavery (ie so called ‘cheap labor’) was put in place by diktat. People weren’t asked if they wanted it. To be sure, the chattel and wage slavery corrupted elites and their hangers on should have been overthrown long ago, the Civil War having been a major missed opportunity imo to have done so.

    Also, it’s good to remind oneself every now and again, that within this tired and old manufactured and broadly controlled (crimethink, I know) Capitalist vs Communist, Right vs Left, etc, dialectic which has been in place since the late 18th century, the British and French Empires, not to mention the United States, were operating under the guidance (if not control) of the self proclaimed ‘enlightened’/’progressive’ types.

    Lastly, after reasonably doing what one can to stop error and (if appropriate or possible) make amends, forgive yourself, even if others won’t.

    • Replies: @LatW
    @S


    They’ve also been presented with a crazy false dichotomy, ie either willfully accept your murder as a people (ie genocide in the truest sense of that much abused term via crudely and barbarically being ‘mixed’ out of existance) as ‘reparations’, or, you’re a bigot.
     
    It is indeed a false dichotomy, and a narrative that needs to be dissected. Once you break up the narrative, you can easily demonstrate the parts that are unjust. It's not really my place to talk about this, but I don't support reparations at all. First and foremost, because every white child on the planet is born innocent and to put it on that child (or to take from that child's parents) would be unjust and even cruel. And I totally agree with your argument for the right to simply exist.

    In my post above, I wasn't arguing for "reparations" or anything of that sort, but simply discussing a conversation between two overeducated Anglos that I overheard. They were actually talking about the economy initially and how life is becoming more costly for certain groups and that foreigners are coming in and buying up housing, due to which some more vulnerable groups of locals get displaced. One of them said "this is nothing new, this happened before when the waves of settlers displaced the Natives" (seemed like a pretty shocking comparison to me at first), and then the liberal boomer touched upon the population part by saying things like "there have been huge migrations in the past in human history, this is just another big cycle, big population movement," etc. As in, there is nothing at all special about this one. I just froze because of how final that statement sounded. Really, lady? What about the kids?

    For example, could the Mongolian descendants of Ghengis Khan, or the descendants of the original conquerers of the Islamic Caliphate, ever pay back for their forebear’s murders and enslavement of others?
     
    I'm sure you know what the reaction of the heirs of the Ottoman Empire would be if they were approached like that (either an uncontrolled bout of anger or just laughter, lol, mixed with indifference towards the helpless whites). And I'm sure you know that if it wasn't for the progressive whites then this wouldn't be an issue. And what is even more crazy, is that the progressive whites are not doing this for some kind of a "social justice" reason, but mostly for class reasons - to signal class superiority. And they couldn't even handle the results of what this ideology would wreak in the future. Nor will they themselves have to deal with the consequences of it (well, maybe at some point when they're 89 or so).

    However, if reparations in regard to the Anglosphere were to be paid, I’d be tempted to start with the confiscation of the great estates of the descendants of the progressives and their hangers on who ran the North American chattel slave trade from New England, to not only be paid to others, but to a great many of their own Anglo-Saxon people who had to suffer under it.
     
    That's what I said above, make it personal, instead of imposing collective guilt. A white boy who is born now had nothing to do with any of it.

    But trust me, the moment it comes to real reparations (hopefully, it doesn't), who are they going to take from? Who will allow their wealth to be touched? The ones to be fleeced under this scenario would most likely be the ones in the middle and maybe upper middle class professionals. They'll have to consider bailing at that point.

    Those reparations on their part would be in conjunction with a true abolition of the still on going slavery, wage slavery
     
    Hahaha, I don't know about that. What could replace "wage slavery"? There is a difference between "wage slavery" per se, and the "open borders, immigration / cheap (or not so cheap anymore) labor" set up.


    Lastly, after reasonably doing what one can to stop error and (if appropriate or possible) make amends, forgive yourself, even if others won’t.
     
    Right, create a narrative that goes something like "I recognize the past mistakes, I'm ready to move on, I no longer want to have anything to do with it, regardless of what others might think, this is my position from now on". Even if you weren't guilty of anything to begin with, this might make some of the "reparations seekers" lay off.

    Replies: @S, @S

  390. @Thulean Friend
    BYD will be the first major Chinese car brand to compete worldwide.

    BYD smashes profit record ahead of European push

    Tesla’s main Chinese challenger BYD has shrugged off supply disruptions as well as foreign and domestic rivals to achieve year-on-year earnings growth of 350 per cent, underscoring the rapid rise of one of China’s most formidable industrial conglomerates.

    The Warren Buffett-backed group’s third-quarter net profit of Rmb5.7bn ($786mn) smashed its previous record of Rmb2.8bn set in the second quarter of this year. The results come just as BYD mounts an aggressive campaign to take on European automakers on their home turf.


    BYD is now among a clutch of Chinese companies posing an existential challenge to electric vehicle industry leader Tesla and incumbent auto titans as the world transitions to EVs. The Shenzhen-based company is highly self-sufficient, controlling its local supply chain of minerals and batteries as well as computer chips and other electronics. Rival Tesla is among its battery customers.


     

    Replies: @A123, @Yahya

    I do not know that it will come out that way, but the EU has completely screwed themselves. (1)

    EU lawmakers agreed to set a zero-emissions sales mandate for new cars and vans by 2035. The deal secures a first win for the European Commission as it looks to push through a major package of green laws — and sacrifices one of the Continent’s biggest industrial products: the gas-guzzling car engine.

    “The agreement … sends a strong signal to industry and consumers: Europe is embracing the shift to zero-emission mobility,” said EU Green Deal chief Frans Timmermans, following four hours of negotiations.

    In confirming the engine ban, Brussels has swerved senior German politicians, automaker captains and parts of its once all-powerful car industry that had fiercely lobbied against betting solely on battery-electric vehicles as part of efforts to tackle transport emissions.

    Decoupling and MAGA Reindustrialization will do much to protect American jobs. However, there is no slack to help Europe on this kind of time frame.

    The only possibility for this reckless EU folly is obtaining raw materials from China. With submissive, locked in, prey, the CCP will suck up the high value parts manufacturing. It will not matter if the badge is a German or Chinese brand.

    Hungary will allow internal combustion emgiene vehicles with Russian (or Serbian) plates to operate freely for a nominal fee. It is not that hard to obtain plates that do not match your primary residence. This option could be used by other EE countries.

    Perhaps the UK will clean up by providing real vehicles to Irland, Spain, and Portugal. Israeli plates in Greece and Cyprus.

    France and Germany have chosen to chosen to impoverish their citizens unless somehow common sense prevails.

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://www.politico.eu/article/how-the-eu-ditched-the-combustion-engine-zero-emissions-green-deal/

  391. @songbird
    @YetAnotherAnon

    Heard that in medieval times, pigs that got loose would sometimes eat infants. Maybe, that could also have something to do with the origin of the taboo.

    Replies: @S, @YetAnotherAnon

    A pig was condemned to be hung for eating a beggar woman’s baby.

    https://www.thevintagenews.com/2016/10/21/medieval-animal-trials-in-europe-a-pig-sentenced-to-death-by-hanging-for-murder/?chrome=1

    “One of the most amusing cases of the trial of a domestic animal was that of a sow together with her six pigs at Savignysur-Etang, in Bourgogne, France, in January 1457. The charge against her was murdering and partly devouring an infant.

    The sow was found guilty and sentenced to death by hanging, though her offspring, partly because of their youth and innocence and the fact that their mother had set them a bad example, but chiefly because proof of their complicity was not forthcoming, were pardoned.

    For an animal found guilty, the penalty was dire. The Normandy pig, depicted in the frontispiece of the Evans book, was charged with having torn the face and arms of a baby in its cradle.

    The pig was sentenced to be “mangled and maimed in the head forelegs”, and then dressed up in a jacket and breeches to be hung from a gallows in the market square.”

    An English songwriter, Bill Caddick, wrote “Poor Pig” about a pig-hanging.

    • Thanks: songbird
  392. @Barbarossa
    @silviosilver

    To be honest, I'm more sympathetic to Sher Singh's worldview than yours. As you've mentioned with your story with the bouncer and the girl you were hitting on, you'll act in an expedient way which only adds to societal breakdown. Though a racialist, you seem to be a liberal at heart.

    Extreme attitudes and measures are needed to resist the real existential threats of multicultural hyper-individualistic liberalism. The first of these measures is the cultivation of a sense of honor and the application of that in your community. If you want different social norms you'll have to be the one to model it, since no one else will do it for you. It can spread from there, which is why tribalism is far superior and meaningful, especially in this age, than racialism.

    Naturally enough, Sher Singh enjoys trolling everyone on here with Sikh maximalism, but behind the trolling is a valid question; what are you willing to die or be killed for? If the real answer is nothing, then perhaps it's time to examine why that is the case. This doesn't mean that honor is primarily about killing or being killed, but questions like this are a gauge of seriousness. If you have no principles that you are willing to die for, then you only have empty preferences, not ethics or honor. Sadly, there is no future there.

    If someday (though I seriously doubt it) a bunch of Sikhs try to take over my corner of the world, they'll probably find stiffer resistance than from some exurb Canadian wimplings, but hey then again, maybe facing armed subjugation would teach people to care about something serious. It may be incomprehensible to people so jaded, but Sikhs, Muslims, Amish etc. have actual beliefs that they take seriously enough to die for. Absent that level of commitment it's all just empty materialism.

    So yeah, I don't mind discussing the weather.

    Replies: @Thulean Friend, @Emil Nikola Richard, @Mikel

    How many Punjabis have you known in real life?

    I put them above Gypsies but below Albanians myself. On the other hand my sample size is not large and my plan is it ain’t ever going to get any bigger.

    • Replies: @sher singh
    @Emil Nikola Richard

    Sikh politicians are consistently the most popular among young women.
    You're consistently mad & butthurt,

    However, your rape fantasies can be fulfilled by Afghans.
    Never say we left your wishes unsatisfied||

    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ

    , @Barbarossa
    @Emil Nikola Richard

    I really haven't known any Punjabis in real life, so I'll have to withhold real judgement on that.

    I will say that in casual interactions I have had a much better impression of Sikhs than either Hindu Indians or most Muslims. That could be the luck of the draw, but does color my judgement somewhat.

    As I said to Thulean Friend, I don't know squat about Sher Singh when push comes to shove, but I do think his trolling is not without merit.

  393. @A123
    What will be the fate of Twitter now that Musk is arriving? (1)

    After Elon Musk walked into Twitter HQ yesterday literally carrying a kitchen sink (“let that sink in”) it was widely expected that he was going to start swinging the ax and send three-quarters of the company’s employees to the unemployment line. Why? Because that’s what he said he was going to do. That didn’t wind up happening, or at least not yet. But the ax did indeed swing, taking three heads off of the censorship hydra. CEO Parag Agrawal was the first to get his walking papers, followed by Vijaya Gadde and Sean Edgett, two of the company’s top legal advisors. Surely Agrawal knew he was on the way out and likely already had his things packed. But nobody expects the firings to stop now. (National Review)
     

    Some conservatives may hold off on tweeting any forbidden thoughts until they are sure that the coast is clear. But I don’t fall into the latter category. Somebody needs to go first and figure out if the reign of the censors has already stopped. Here’s a test tweet that I sent out this morning. If you can see it, then maybe we’re really in the clear or at least getting close to it. If the link is broken, the censors are still scurrying around under the floorboards. [MORE]


    First full day of Elon's Twitter. Testing... Testing...

    The vaccines don't stop you from catching COVID.
    Men cannot have babies.
    If you have to show your ID to get on a plane you should show it to vote.
    Joe Biden has obvious cognitive issues.
    (hits "Tweet" and holds breath)
     

     
    We will not know for awhile yet, but the initial moves are promising.

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://hotair.com/jazz-shaw/2022/10/28/musks-new-broom-sweeps-clean-on-day-one-will-reinstate-banned-accounts-n506334



    https://twitter.com/JazzShaw/status/1585951953091174401?s=20

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard

  394. @Coconuts
    @LatW


    I was dumbfounded, tbh, and when I first heard it what shocked me the most was the ease of the acceptance of these facts on the ground, not to mention I felt deeply offended, this was a rich Scots Irish boomer woman who said this, completely oblivious to her children’s and grandchildren’s future.
     
    I think there is this thing among liberal boomers, where they are moralistic about being hedonistic and self-centred during their lifetime, and then their life can be crowned by the altruistic gift of handing on their territory and assets to what they perceive as oppressed groups after their death.

    This is probably one of the things contributing to the currently growing idea that group identity is more important and real than individual identity and experience. Boomers' children can therefore offer valid atonement and must make amends for the perceived shortcomings of their parents, grandparents, great-grandparents etc. It's sort of masked to some extent as relating to impersonal 'systems of social power'.


    First, this is not even on their radar right now. Second, if they did think about the replacement, even some of the normies (not to even mention the nationalists) would feel a bit taken aback if they saw what’s really going on. They will definitely care if it starts happening in UA. The only question is if they’ll have the resources to withstand it.
     
    That seems to fit closely with the attitude of the Belarusians I know, except it feels like the ones living in the UK are becoming aware of something weird going on in British/Anglo society.

    It is kind of true though that first they displaced the Natives. It’s just that does it really mean that the new settlers would have to be displaced, too? It’s an ideological question.
     
    You find similar arguments being put forward in Britain itself, by white British people; because British people from some time ago went to North America and Australia and committed genocide against the natives, large shrinking of the white population and large immigration from Africa and South Asia into the UK is appropriate justice or payback and so is a positive thing.

    At the same time, the idea that demographic change is happening is often still considered a relatively outlandish or left-field racist idea, you seem to find people who hold the two ideas simultaneously. Similar to the immigration parallax thing from the US.

    Replies: @LatW

    I think there is this thing among liberal boomers, where they are moralistic about being hedonistic and self-centred during their lifetime, and then their life can be crowned by the altruistic gift of handing on their territory and assets to what they perceive as oppressed groups after their death.

    I don’t want to bash that generation as a whole, but there are definitely trends when it comes to liberal boomers. It should just be noted that their wealth was not created just by them, but also from the input of the previous generations. Interesting thing about this group though is how, in their personal lives, they are actually very conservative (even if they may have had a somewhat liberal lifestyle in their youth). They are very lifestyle conscientious, frugal and wouldn’t do in a million years some of the things that are propagated by the left these days. That’s kind of telling, I’d say. Liberalism for thee, but not for me.

    Btw, speaking of distributing funds, there’s a recent documentary about the funding of BLM (made by Candace Owens) – apparently some of the funds were squandered and went into questionable directions.

    But to be fair, a lot of the donations do go out to positive causes, a lot of the legacy projects will probably be valuable for everyone.

    [MORE]

    Boomers’ children can therefore offer valid atonement and must make amends for the perceived shortcomings of their parents, grandparents, great-grandparents etc. It’s sort of masked to some extent as relating to impersonal ‘systems of social power’.

    Yea, but they don’t own the children in a way that they can decide this for them. This is why the middle generation and the children themselves need to stand up. The “systems of impersonal power” will collapse once you speak out and make it personal. Personal is political, right?

    That seems to fit closely with the attitude of the Belarusians I know, except it feels like the ones living in the UK are becoming aware of something weird going on in British/Anglo society.

    I’m curious as to how Eastern Slavic normies feel about this. How much resistance they can put up, probably not insane amounts as many of them will “go with the flow” but we will need them nevertheless as a shoulder to lean on.

    You find similar arguments being put forward in Britain itself, by white British people; because British people from some time ago went to North America and Australia and committed genocide against the natives, large shrinking of the white population and large immigration from Africa and South Asia into the UK is appropriate justice or payback and so is a positive thing

    One can question the causality there. Not to take away from your ownership of your great Empire, but just because you were somewhere at some point, doesn’t mean you should be reduced in your own homeland. Where does one make that leap from just rolling back the Empire to all of a sudden all British of all generations and income levels have to pay in their ancestral home? A bit far fetched, I’d say. One simply needs to dissect this narrative to show that the continuity doesn’t apply to the indigenous British and their land.

    • Agree: S
  395. @Thulean Friend
    @Barbarossa


    Naturally enough, Sher Singh enjoys trolling everyone on here with Sikh maximalism, but behind the trolling is a valid question; what are you willing to die or be killed for?
     
    I'd take him more seriously if he wasn't yet another diaspora LARPer sitting thousands of miles away from his historic homeland that he claims to care about. Much like the dregs shouting Khalistani slogans in a Toronto suburb, thinking it will bring national salvation to the decrepit status of their stateless people.

    Authenticity is important and whatever flaws Silvio may or may not have, he is at least internally consistent in his politics. Whites in the Anglosphere have melded into one. In Europe, Eastern Europeans are still separate from Germanics and Nords to a greater extent than they are in Canada, Australia, USA etc. So Silvio's politics is in fact rooted in his place, as he shares a common identity with other whites.


    Sikhs, Muslims, Amish etc. have actual beliefs that they take seriously enough to die for
     
    Do sikhs really? Their emigration rates are sky-high. If they really cared so passionately, you'd think they'd stay and fight for their supposed homeland in Punjab.

    I don't mind people leaving to find a better life. It's a natural human instinct. But moving abroad and then brandishing sectarian flags safely ensconced in Canada or Australia while having no real plans to do the actual hard work to fight for the self-determination of your people simply comes across as pathetic and should be called out as such. People like that do not deserve a homeland and they'll never get one either.

    Frankly, I do not understand your sikhophilia. There are many other worthy people who actually fight hard for their right to national sovereignty. Sikhs aren't one of them.

    I repeat: the only martial spirit they have left is the effort they put in to get a Canadian visa. It's time to accept that fact.

    Replies: @sher singh, @sher singh, @Yahya, @Barbarossa

  396. @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Barbarossa

    How many Punjabis have you known in real life?

    I put them above Gypsies but below Albanians myself. On the other hand my sample size is not large and my plan is it ain't ever going to get any bigger.

    Replies: @sher singh, @Barbarossa

    Sikh politicians are consistently the most popular among young women.
    You’re consistently mad & butthurt,

    However, your rape fantasies can be fulfilled by Afghans.
    Never say we left your wishes unsatisfied||

    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ

  397. @sher singh
    @Sean


    Sunak has a special advantage on immigration matters; the Rwanda policy was called ‘disgusting’, such language can hardly be used about Sunak. I thought Starmer looked depressed at the a la Boris way his support for Corbyn was brought up by Sunak. Starmer was reduced to carping about Braverman, who is not only far more ethnic but nurturing and vulnerable looking that the shockingly hard faced smirker Patel (from a Hindu family).
     
    Nope, there's a caste supremacy/Brahmanical fascism narrative at the ready.
    Open Hindu identity can be attacked from a Leftist POV, but they do so selectively.

    The West started gun control AFTER post-cold war mass immigration.
    The rise of Hindus to top positions has a similar counter-point in Hinduvta bashing.

    Replies: @Sean

    Nope, there’s a caste supremacy/Brahmanical fascism narrative at the ready.
    Open Hindu identity can be attacked from a Leftist POV, but they do so selectively

    Starmer would not dare, he is only comfortable with talking like that about an implicitly white rich elite who are putatively undeserving and owe their position to the advantages that their parents give them. But this is bullcrap “Plomin argues that “schools matter, but they don’t make a difference”. He suggests that schools matter because they should serve as the foundation of our literacy and numeracy and because we happen to spend half our childhood in school. Plomin however argues that schools do not make children better.”

    Sunak is married to Akshata Murthy, daughter of a Brahmin billionaire; they are not are rare as Dalit billionaires. All genes isn’t it. Genetic determinism? Noooo, Superdetermininsm.

  398. @Thulean Friend
    @Barbarossa


    Naturally enough, Sher Singh enjoys trolling everyone on here with Sikh maximalism, but behind the trolling is a valid question; what are you willing to die or be killed for?
     
    I'd take him more seriously if he wasn't yet another diaspora LARPer sitting thousands of miles away from his historic homeland that he claims to care about. Much like the dregs shouting Khalistani slogans in a Toronto suburb, thinking it will bring national salvation to the decrepit status of their stateless people.

    Authenticity is important and whatever flaws Silvio may or may not have, he is at least internally consistent in his politics. Whites in the Anglosphere have melded into one. In Europe, Eastern Europeans are still separate from Germanics and Nords to a greater extent than they are in Canada, Australia, USA etc. So Silvio's politics is in fact rooted in his place, as he shares a common identity with other whites.


    Sikhs, Muslims, Amish etc. have actual beliefs that they take seriously enough to die for
     
    Do sikhs really? Their emigration rates are sky-high. If they really cared so passionately, you'd think they'd stay and fight for their supposed homeland in Punjab.

    I don't mind people leaving to find a better life. It's a natural human instinct. But moving abroad and then brandishing sectarian flags safely ensconced in Canada or Australia while having no real plans to do the actual hard work to fight for the self-determination of your people simply comes across as pathetic and should be called out as such. People like that do not deserve a homeland and they'll never get one either.

    Frankly, I do not understand your sikhophilia. There are many other worthy people who actually fight hard for their right to national sovereignty. Sikhs aren't one of them.

    I repeat: the only martial spirit they have left is the effort they put in to get a Canadian visa. It's time to accept that fact.

    Replies: @sher singh, @sher singh, @Yahya, @Barbarossa

    Gangetic + White Lib blood combine to create the worst form of manlet||
    You’ve shown your hatred of Sikhi during the farmer protests||

    https://www.facebook.com/HeroesInUniform/photos/mustread-story-of-chhotey-veer-little-brother-gurtej-just-23-years-of-age-whose-/575677293133364/

    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ

  399. @S
    @LatW


    I’ve heard it from them before, too, using almost exactly the same language, “it’s a cycle”, “it’s how history goes”, I was dumbfounded, tbh, and when I first heard it what shocked me the most was the ease of the acceptance of these facts on the ground...
     
    They've been brainwashed.

    They've also been presented with a crazy false dichotomy, ie either willfully accept your murder as a people (ie genocide in the truest sense of that much abused term via crudely and barbarically being 'mixed' out of existance) as 'reparations', or, you're a bigot.



    Guilt and shame have a place, to bring about self correction. It is not, however, to be cynically used/manipulated as a weapon by some to bring about the destruction or suicide of others.

    If one feels reparations of some type (within reason) are in order, sure, but within the context of one living, not dieing. Colonization of one's own homeland, the accompanying mass murder, rapine, and genocide of one's own people via 'mixing', isn't reparations, however, but simply destruction. Healthy people (dare it be said normal people) don't engage in that type of thing, nor do they advocate it for others.

    As for reasonable reparations, can they ever really be paid back? For example, could the Mongolian descendants of Ghengis Khan, or the descendants of the original conquerers of the Islamic Caliphate, ever pay back for their forebear's murders and enslavement of others?

    However, if reparations in regard to the Anglosphere were to be paid, I'd be tempted to start with the confiscation of the great estates of the descendants of the progressives and their hangers on who ran the North American chattel slave trade from New England, to not only be paid to others, but to a great many of their own Anglo-Saxon people who had to suffer under it.

    Those reparations on their part would be in conjunction with a true abolition of the still on going slavery, wage slavery, ie the early 19th century monetization of chattel slavery and its trade, specifically the so called cheap labor/mass immigration system. Wage slavery is the economic and political basis of the modern progressive Multi-Cultural state, a state which not coincidentally closely parallels the Anglosphere chattel slave holding society it directly evolved from.

    Within the Anglosphere, folks should self identify with those who didn't own chattel slaves and had to suffer grievously under the system, which was most people. Just as with chattel slavery, wage slavery (ie so called 'cheap labor') was put in place by diktat. People weren't asked if they wanted it. To be sure, the chattel and wage slavery corrupted elites and their hangers on should have been overthrown long ago, the Civil War having been a major missed opportunity imo to have done so.

    Also, it's good to remind oneself every now and again, that within this tired and old manufactured and broadly controlled (crimethink, I know) Capitalist vs Communist, Right vs Left, etc, dialectic which has been in place since the late 18th century, the British and French Empires, not to mention the United States, were operating under the guidance (if not control) of the self proclaimed 'enlightened'/'progressive' types.

    Lastly, after reasonably doing what one can to stop error and (if appropriate or possible) make amends, forgive yourself, even if others won't.

    Replies: @LatW

    They’ve also been presented with a crazy false dichotomy, ie either willfully accept your murder as a people (ie genocide in the truest sense of that much abused term via crudely and barbarically being ‘mixed’ out of existance) as ‘reparations’, or, you’re a bigot.

    It is indeed a false dichotomy, and a narrative that needs to be dissected. Once you break up the narrative, you can easily demonstrate the parts that are unjust. It’s not really my place to talk about this, but I don’t support reparations at all. First and foremost, because every white child on the planet is born innocent and to put it on that child (or to take from that child’s parents) would be unjust and even cruel. And I totally agree with your argument for the right to simply exist.

    [MORE]

    In my post above, I wasn’t arguing for “reparations” or anything of that sort, but simply discussing a conversation between two overeducated Anglos that I overheard. They were actually talking about the economy initially and how life is becoming more costly for certain groups and that foreigners are coming in and buying up housing, due to which some more vulnerable groups of locals get displaced. One of them said “this is nothing new, this happened before when the waves of settlers displaced the Natives” (seemed like a pretty shocking comparison to me at first), and then the liberal boomer touched upon the population part by saying things like “there have been huge migrations in the past in human history, this is just another big cycle, big population movement,” etc. As in, there is nothing at all special about this one. I just froze because of how final that statement sounded. Really, lady? What about the kids?

    For example, could the Mongolian descendants of Ghengis Khan, or the descendants of the original conquerers of the Islamic Caliphate, ever pay back for their forebear’s murders and enslavement of others?

    I’m sure you know what the reaction of the heirs of the Ottoman Empire would be if they were approached like that (either an uncontrolled bout of anger or just laughter, lol, mixed with indifference towards the helpless whites). And I’m sure you know that if it wasn’t for the progressive whites then this wouldn’t be an issue. And what is even more crazy, is that the progressive whites are not doing this for some kind of a “social justice” reason, but mostly for class reasons – to signal class superiority. And they couldn’t even handle the results of what this ideology would wreak in the future. Nor will they themselves have to deal with the consequences of it (well, maybe at some point when they’re 89 or so).

    However, if reparations in regard to the Anglosphere were to be paid, I’d be tempted to start with the confiscation of the great estates of the descendants of the progressives and their hangers on who ran the North American chattel slave trade from New England, to not only be paid to others, but to a great many of their own Anglo-Saxon people who had to suffer under it.

    That’s what I said above, make it personal, instead of imposing collective guilt. A white boy who is born now had nothing to do with any of it.

    But trust me, the moment it comes to real reparations (hopefully, it doesn’t), who are they going to take from? Who will allow their wealth to be touched? The ones to be fleeced under this scenario would most likely be the ones in the middle and maybe upper middle class professionals. They’ll have to consider bailing at that point.

    Those reparations on their part would be in conjunction with a true abolition of the still on going slavery, wage slavery

    Hahaha, I don’t know about that. What could replace “wage slavery”? There is a difference between “wage slavery” per se, and the “open borders, immigration / cheap (or not so cheap anymore) labor” set up.

    Lastly, after reasonably doing what one can to stop error and (if appropriate or possible) make amends, forgive yourself, even if others won’t.

    Right, create a narrative that goes something like “I recognize the past mistakes, I’m ready to move on, I no longer want to have anything to do with it, regardless of what others might think, this is my position from now on”. Even if you weren’t guilty of anything to begin with, this might make some of the “reparations seekers” lay off.

    • Replies: @S
    @LatW


    “there have been huge migrations in the past in human history, this is just another big cycle, big population movement,” etc. As in, there is nothing at all special about this one. I just froze because of how final that statement sounded. Really, lady? What about the kids?
     
    I should have added to brainwashed, that they are delusional as well.



    If you ever have the time, check out the wiki entry for Robert J Lifton's 1961 book Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism and, in particular, the section of the entry on the 'Eight Criteria for Thought Reform'. It is very revealing as to what has been to people's minds via the corporate mass media. Multi-Culturalism and it's adherants have all the ear marks of being a gigantic cult.

    And what is even more crazy, is that the progressive whites are not doing this for some kind of a “social justice” reason, but mostly for class reasons – to signal class superiority. And they couldn’t even handle the results of what this ideology would wreak in the future. Nor will they themselves have to deal with the consequences of it (well, maybe at some point when they’re 89 or so).
     
    They have their virtue signaling. They also, as you allude, are due to their personal wealth in many instances somewhat insulated (for now) from the results of what they advocate.

    But trust me, the moment it comes to real reparations (hopefully, it doesn’t), who are they going to take from? Who will allow their wealth to be touched? The ones to be fleeced under this scenario would most likely be the ones in the middle and maybe upper middle class professionals.
     
    I agree. The main thing is to stop the error, ie colonization, slavery, etc. I mentioned Ghengis Khan and the Caliphate to show others had done wrong as well, and the practical impossibility of ever paying back. However, if a person feels bad about certain things, sure, do something to make amends, but within the context of you and yours living, not destroying one's self. [I say that as someone who doesn't like a great many things that were done in the past. I think empires are a bad business.]


    Those reparations on their part would be in conjunction with a true abolition of the still on going slavery, wage slavery

     

    Hahaha, I don’t know about that. What could replace “wage slavery”? There is a difference between “wage slavery” per se, and the “open borders, immigration / cheap (or not so cheap anymore) labor” set up.
     
    When I use the term 'wage slavery' I am not speaking about legitimate generic wage labor where someone might on occasion be paid a bit low, but specifically in regards to the phenomena of someone not wanting to pay (more often than not) their own people the prevailing real time local rates for the labor, and instead importing (typically by diktat) alien labor, aka 'immigrants', also known by the euphamism as 'cheap labor', to do the work for much less.

    These are people who have often been first reduced to an unnaturally low state of being, as who else would ever agree to work significantly below the local rates. [I submit, the flooding of China with opium in the the 19th century may have had the ulterior motive of 'opening up' China and it's hundreds of millions of people to enmasse predation as wage slaves, ie so called 'cheap labor'.]

    I see the term 'cheap labor' as a term of propaganda concocted by people who had historically been involved in chattel slavery and it's trade to sell people on this (for them) much more profitable poison. The term 'cheap labor', which has been around since the first half of the 19th century, as intended sounds quite innocuous.

    The term wage slavery much more accurately conveys what is going on, the systematic theft of significant value of the individual's labor being much more profitably and efficiently taken directly from their pay, ie their 'wages', and hence the term wage slavery, as opposed to via their being physically owned as cumbersome and costly to maintain property, ie 'chattel', and hence the term chattel slavery.

    I stand by the idea that chattel slavery and it's trade was monetized in the 19th century with the introduction of wage slavery (ie so called 'cheap labor') rather than having been abolished. My post archives flesh this out much more thoroughly than I do here.

    Right, create a narrative that goes something like “I recognize the past mistakes, I’m ready to move on, I no longer want to have anything to do with it, regardless of what others might think, this is my position from now on”.
     
    There's a powerful moral case to preserve peoplehood, or, at least have the right to, it's just been so poorly presented (generally) that few would know it.

    Replies: @LatW

    , @S
    @LatW


    They were actually talking about the economy initially and how life is becoming more costly for certain groups and that foreigners are coming in and buying up housing, due to which some more vulnerable groups of locals get displaced. One of them said “this is nothing new, this happened before when the waves of settlers displaced the Natives” (seemed like a pretty shocking comparison to me at first), and then the liberal boomer touched upon the population part by saying things like “there have been huge migrations in the past in human history, this is just another big cycle, big population movement,” etc.

     

    That amoral self centered type of mentality has been around awhile.

    There was a book published in 1871 in the United States entitled One Hundred Years Progress of the United States. Pages 460 - 527 describe the United States one hundred years in the future in 1970. Interestingly, they describe walking through a future city in Utah the last few pages.

    It's all very 'Multi-cultural' as they would say today.

    Due to completely open borders for wage slavery (ie 'cheap labor') purposes, the United States is to have over 400 million people. In the future inner city, acts of ultra-violence are a common everyday occurrence on the streets; a knife crime is described by a drug crazed/hatred consumed Malay, one of the many future discarded slaves from all over the world is to occupy the US inner cities.

    Race is readily acknowledged to exist, and due to the deliberately uncontrolled mass immigration the country will be fundamentally changed, both morally and intellectually.

    A bit dry in places but worth a read.

    Below, on pg 511 which I've linked to, the writer casually describes importing by diktat tens of millions of wage slaves into the United States from China, then (in 1870) newly opened up due to the Opium Wars, which will 'take the place of our present laboring classes'.

    The template described here of importing alien labor to avoid paying the prevailing real time local rates to one's own people is straight from chattel slavery. These historically slavery corrupted elites and hangers on, whom long ago should have been overthrown and removed from power, did not (I submit) reform themselves in regards to slavery.

    Should they succeed in creating their long sought after world state, or 'empire' as they sometimes call it, it may very well be a slavery based world order.

    It's what they know and are accustomed to.

    As was recently heard, with a slight addendum...

    'You will have nothing, and you will work for nothing, and you will be happy.'

    With the proper conditioning, it could maybe be done.


    'The Chinese question, viz., whether the Chinese and other oriental nations shall be allowed to swarm into our territory and take the place of our present laboring classes; and whether, if, as is probable, this right is conceded, they should be admitted to the
    same political and social privileges with ourselves.'
     
    https://archive.org/details/onehundredyearsp00flinrich/page/510/mode/2up
  400. @sudden death
    @Sean


    Muslim Pretty Patel
     

    Patel (from a Hindu family).
     
    allegedly Muslim from a Hindu family, lol

    hopefully just a typo, but you never know these days when Soros seriously becomes a Muslim too for someone out there;)

    Replies: @A123, @Sean

    Privileged Patels of Gujarat fight to be given low caste status … New generation fights unconventional class war, claiming their once affluent caste is now at a disadvantage when jobs are set aside for lower-born Indians

    They fled India to escape the rule of the lower orders, which were left behind,

  401. @AP
    @Dmitry


    The report says wealthy immigrants in Vancouver are mainland Chinese
     
    Maybe the recent ones and the super-rich, but the Chinese masses in Vancouver are mostly from Hong Kong (and I would add Taiwan).

    Incoming mainland Chinese started to outnumber incoming Hong Kongers in the mid 2000s but most of the Chinese in Vancouver have non-mainland origins (mostly Hong Kong, also Taiwan) due to the massive head start in immigration in the 1980s and 1990s.


    There is nothing shameful about eastern Europeans diverting some money to other Europeans

    The taxpayers who are paying for Eastern Europe are not Eastern Europeans, they are the Western Europeans
     

    Yes. And these same taxpayers pay to settle their own homelands with non-Europeans. It is good when Eastern Europeans get some of that money diverted to help other Europeans, instead of it all being used to fund their western cousins’ own replacement.

    You can be so critical of Syrians, but it’s not like the postsoviet space is recently appearing more in the civilized world and European values. If I remember Syrians were only cutting off heads, not boiling them
     
    You have a funny tendency to find some weird abnormal phenomenon and make broad and false conclusions about it. Such as the utterly marginal “Mormon” polygamists, and now some Ukrainian soldier who boiled a Russian soldier’s head.

    What general conclusion will you make about the culture of the western EU, based on the case of the German cannibal? He found that the person tastes like pork.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/dec/04/germany.lukeharding

    Replies: @Dmitry

    most of the Chinese in Vancouver have non-mainland origins (mostly Hong Kong, also Taiwan

    Wealthy immigrants in Vancouver of the last twenty years, are mainly from mainland China. You were saying they are not “Sovok” (to relate your interest in the Cold War and dislike of the Soviet Union). But as I said in the first reply, these wealthy immigrants that flood Vancouver are mostly mainland Chinese, often children of political elite, closer than most Chinese to Communist Party. Skyscrapers of Vancouver are built with the money which is not far from China’s Communist Party.

    It is good when Eastern Europeans get some of that money diverted to help other Europeans, instead of it all being used to fund their western cousins’ own

    There are strange claims in this paragraph. Money from Western European taxpayers for convergence funding to the Warsaw Pact, is their taxpayer money, which would be used to pay for schools, transport and hospitals in their country.

    This is the money of the Western European taxpayer. It’s not all money which is going to be used as “immigration funding for Syrians”, unless you will claim this is the main part of the government budget.

    You could say you prefer Western European taxpayers should use their money to fund someone in Warsaw Pact region than from Syria. But your idea that the opportunity cost for the EU’s convergence transfers is “funding Syrians” is sophistry. The Western European taxpayers’ money would be used in their country, to build infrastructure and other public spending, which is instead used to fund Eastern Europe.

    From self-interest of Western European taxpayer, it would possibly be more optimal to spend in your own country, than to give your money to Warsaw Pact countries like Poland and Hungary, which most Europeans will never even visit as a tourist.

    If Western Europeans want to give money to another country, it would be less controversial as a private choice. If they want to give money to Poles or Hungarians, then there they can donate their personal income. But the use of public tax money to fund convergence of foreign countries is controversial and it is a reason Boris Johnson has public support to remove UK from the EU.

    At the beginning of the discussion, you were saying it is a good thing about Poland, they in a “beggar position” receiving money from Western Europe.

    EU money has been good for Poland, so it is rational for Poles to want the EU’s money. But while it is rational to want to receive the foreigners’ money, I don’t see how it’s an area of pride or indicator of the national virtue to receive foreigners money.

    have a funny tendency to find some weird abnormal phenomenon and make broad and false conclusions about it. Such as the utterly marginal “Mormon” polygamists, and now some Ukrainian soldier who boiled a Russian soldier’s head.

    Nobody is generalizing from Ukrainian head boiling. Average Ukrainians are not boiling heads, average Syrians are not cutting off heads either. Syrians and Ukrainians are two examples of people who are victims, living in a dysfunctional and dangerous place, where head cutting and boiling can exist as an extreme example of violence that is happening in the local tribal conflicts.

    You were writing a bit like the Syrian immigrants are somehow antonym to Eastern Europe. Sure, postsoviet space is a different world than the Warsaw Pact. But postsoviet space is nowadays as violent as the Middle East and a lot of Eastern Europe is in postsoviet space, not Warsaw Pact region.

    There is nothing marginal to say Ukrainian reality is not so more civilized than origin of the most of the other immigrants in Europe, whether Syria, Middle East, Latin America.

    Ukraine is between Zambia and Sierra Leone in corruption ratings. The economic development level is the same as North Africa. The topic of violence. In Israel-Arab conflict, maybe around 50,000 people have been killed in 100 years. In Ukraine, the same number killed in 8 months. Ukraine is more violent than some of the most famous Middle East warzones. In other rankings of civilian violence also higher during peacetime than many Middle Eastern countries.

    For Western Europeans, to have open borders with the Russian empire/postsoviet space, is not such a nonscary topic, that contrasts with accepting refugees from Syria. It is not like opening borders to Japan, New Zealand or Australia.

    Postsoviet Eastern Europe is including a warzone, which even in the most optimistic scenario will have significant long-term costs for Western European taxpayers.

    There are Baltic states which have been successful EU members, but even they are exporting a lot of the organized crime in Europe. Baltic states are also small and had been more developed for centuries already. And then “successful” countries like Poland, have still pulled hundreds of billions of dollars of public money from the Western European countries, which they could have benefited more if the money was expended in their own country than in foreigners’ country.

    What general conclusion will you make about the culture of the western EU, based on the case of the German cannibal? He found that the person tastes like pork.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/dec/04/germany.lukeharding

    Lol we know, “no one who speaks German could be an evil man”.

    • Agree: sher singh, Yahya
    • Replies: @LatW
    @Dmitry


    In Israel-Arab conflict, maybe around 50,000 people have been killed in 100 years. In Ukraine, the same number killed in 8 months. Ukraine is more violent than some of the most famous Middle East warzones.
     
    No, Dim, let's not pretend that nothing happened here. You know very well that the casualty rate is higher because there was a full scale invasion and all the Soviet made arsenal, that was collected over decades, was all of sudden expended. The carnage would've been even bigger if it wasn't for the Ukrainian air defense. It's not because of some innate Ukrainian character that this is the case, but more because of the levels of violence they have been subjected to. These people are not worse than some hipster in Moscow or some vatnik imperialist cheering the war on from his couch (oh, not anymore I guess, time to join in!).

    And there is something seriously wrong with the picture where a young man is living in his village but all of a sudden there is a foreign occupier tank in the field right next to his village, all exploded with body parts laying around. Some young men approach this kind of thing with humor, often black humor, to salvage their psyche.

    Replies: @Dmitry, @YetAnotherAnon

    , @sudden death
    @Dmitry


    The topic of violence. In Israel-Arab conflict, maybe around 50,000 people have been killed in 100 years. In Ukraine, the same number killed in 8 months. Ukraine is more violent than some of the most famous Middle East warzones.
     
    It probably would not be much of exaggeration to say that military technical level and intensity of battlefield killing (e.g. accuracy and/or amount of artillery) in this war from both sides has been way more higher than in past Middle East conflicts and so far this was the main reason for higher troop bodycounts on the ground, but not some exclusive personal inter-Slavic bloodthirstiness.

    Also remembered reading some RF soldier accounts about artillery usage at the start of modern Syrian 2016-17 campaign, they already had experience of battling 2014-15 non westernized and almost Soviet type UA army at Ilovaisk/Debaltsevo type battles and yet were surprised that they can be relaxed now after shooting shells at Syrian "rebels" compared with UA army which was very quick and accurate in shooting back even then.

    It was clear from many such details, that overall warfare difficulty level was way lower in modern Syria than in UA circa 2014-15 and it was sort of playing several years in lower level league for RF army, which now is struggling when returning into higher quality and more difficult regular army warfare zone.

  402. @Coconuts
    @Dmitry


    For countries like Poland, there might always be the limit for convergence to their neighbor, as the great companies, engineers and most talented workers, technology, will be mostly German (or another elite country).
     
    Will Germany continue to be as elite in the future?

    UK’s “Brazification” is importing the wealthiest people in the world and skilled gastarbeiters, with postcolonial working classes.
     
    Afaik Brazilification is a term from the US, the French have a variant 'Algerification', where a country's social structure comes to resemble that of colonial Algeria, but it has less recognition.

    If the country contains many of the world's richest, yet its production of wealth each year will only be similar to Poland's, it seems to be an indication that an Algeria-like social structure is the future. Given the highly wealthy minority are likely to produce a disproportionate portion of this GDP, the low productivity tendency in the rest of the economy and population must be set to continue.

    Many of the gastarbeiters and their families are surely future citizens, and iirc the qualifications needed to become one are now education to age 18, nowadays this is no longer a very high level.


    Maybe not such a future for the local culture, but somehow you can doubt that the wealthy of the world will be establishing in Poland.
     
    At the moment I am unconvinced of the value of an achievement like this. Isn't it like making the status of elite country dependent on where comprador elites choose to keep their wealth?

    Replies: @Dmitry

    unconvinced of the value of an achievement like this. Isn’t it like making the status of elite country dependent on where comprador elites

    It’s not only positive for the locals to receive the world’s super wealthy population (for example, increase in property costs), but from the information point of view, there is a healthy symptom for the country, when you see people want to build a life in the country, or store the wealth there, as it depends on the political stability, safety, legal system, property rights.

    Wealthy Chinese are moving their family to Vancouver, partly because they view Canada as a better place to build their life, have family future and property. This is an indicator that Canada has a more stable legal system, more habitable society, as there are more than a hundred thousand millionaires voting to move there.

    We live in a century where, because of technology (transport technology in the most basic level) and economic structure, a significant portion of the world’s population will move between countries. So, even while you can dislike the moving of people, globalization that will only increase this century, the regions people move is showing information about real differences in life in these countries with the sense of Francis Galton’s “wisdom of crowds”.

    Often there is shown to be preference to move to countries with anglosaxon political and legal origin which could be seen as a view of the best long-term stability. Australia, USA, UK, New Zealand, Singapore, Canada, Australia.

    Given the highly wealthy minority are likely to produce a disproportionate portion of this GDP, the low productivity

    Well this would sound like “Brazilification”, with a wealthy elite increasing their control of the economy.

    But UK is not Brazil, it has many of the most advanced industries, most educated people, talented engineers, scientific success etc. The immigration is not only contrary for this, as many of the world’s skilled workers are trying to go there.

    Also the origin of the wealth, of the wealthy immigrants, is not usually from the local ecoomy.

    Will Germany continue to be as elite in the future?

    Who knows the future? Maybe Thulean Friend has some more economic knowledge to predict this.

    But for the GDP, the Western European countries are closely matching. The last decade has been stagnation in all these countries. But Germany, France and UK only had stagnation, while Italy and Spain could be declining.

    • Replies: @Coconuts
    @Dmitry


    We live in a century where, because of technology (transport technology in the most basic level) and economic structure, a significant portion of the world’s population will move between countries. So, even while you can dislike the moving of people, globalization that will only increase this century, the regions people move is showing information about real differences in life in these countries with the sense of Francis Galton’s “wisdom of crowds”.
     
    I remember hearing a French Marxist economist (iirc) sketch this out 20 years ago, he seems to have predicted things with some accuracy. But, increasing concentration and centralisation of capital combined with growing importance of a minority of experts/technocrats doesn't seem to be necessarily the best solution for overall development of a population, even if it is inevitable. There are benefits from being in a country with a lot of very rich people and some of the foremost world technocrats, but it means the lives of the rest of the population are likely to become both highly dependent on and controlled by this international elite. This other part of the population has relatively low value except in their capacity of service to those who control this accumulation of financial wealth and expertise; they can always be replaced by immigrants from poorer parts of the world.



    It doesn't seem surprising that if more highly wealthy people and high productivity experts move into the UK, more of wealth production and GDP will be down to them (I guess earnings from the wealth they place in British banks and its management will count as UK GDP). Demographic change may explain future low productivity in the other parts of the population as the current segments of it with low educational attainment grow in relative number.

    This is why in the future some more average European person may prefer to live in a country more like Poland, where wealth production is more widely shared through the population and there won't be this level of stratification combined with significant ethnic diversity.

    Replies: @Dmitry

  403. @Dmitry
    @AP


    most of the Chinese in Vancouver have non-mainland origins (mostly Hong Kong, also Taiwan
     
    Wealthy immigrants in Vancouver of the last twenty years, are mainly from mainland China. You were saying they are not "Sovok" (to relate your interest in the Cold War and dislike of the Soviet Union). But as I said in the first reply, these wealthy immigrants that flood Vancouver are mostly mainland Chinese, often children of political elite, closer than most Chinese to Communist Party. Skyscrapers of Vancouver are built with the money which is not far from China's Communist Party.

    It is good when Eastern Europeans get some of that money diverted to help other Europeans, instead of it all being used to fund their western cousins’ own

     

    There are strange claims in this paragraph. Money from Western European taxpayers for convergence funding to the Warsaw Pact, is their taxpayer money, which would be used to pay for schools, transport and hospitals in their country.

    This is the money of the Western European taxpayer. It's not all money which is going to be used as "immigration funding for Syrians", unless you will claim this is the main part of the government budget.

    You could say you prefer Western European taxpayers should use their money to fund someone in Warsaw Pact region than from Syria. But your idea that the opportunity cost for the EU's convergence transfers is "funding Syrians" is sophistry. The Western European taxpayers' money would be used in their country, to build infrastructure and other public spending, which is instead used to fund Eastern Europe.

    From self-interest of Western European taxpayer, it would possibly be more optimal to spend in your own country, than to give your money to Warsaw Pact countries like Poland and Hungary, which most Europeans will never even visit as a tourist.

    If Western Europeans want to give money to another country, it would be less controversial as a private choice. If they want to give money to Poles or Hungarians, then there they can donate their personal income. But the use of public tax money to fund convergence of foreign countries is controversial and it is a reason Boris Johnson has public support to remove UK from the EU.

    At the beginning of the discussion, you were saying it is a good thing about Poland, they in a "beggar position" receiving money from Western Europe.

    EU money has been good for Poland, so it is rational for Poles to want the EU's money. But while it is rational to want to receive the foreigners' money, I don't see how it's an area of pride or indicator of the national virtue to receive foreigners money.


    have a funny tendency to find some weird abnormal phenomenon and make broad and false conclusions about it. Such as the utterly marginal “Mormon” polygamists, and now some Ukrainian soldier who boiled a Russian soldier’s head.

     

    Nobody is generalizing from Ukrainian head boiling. Average Ukrainians are not boiling heads, average Syrians are not cutting off heads either. Syrians and Ukrainians are two examples of people who are victims, living in a dysfunctional and dangerous place, where head cutting and boiling can exist as an extreme example of violence that is happening in the local tribal conflicts.

    You were writing a bit like the Syrian immigrants are somehow antonym to Eastern Europe. Sure, postsoviet space is a different world than the Warsaw Pact. But postsoviet space is nowadays as violent as the Middle East and a lot of Eastern Europe is in postsoviet space, not Warsaw Pact region.

    There is nothing marginal to say Ukrainian reality is not so more civilized than origin of the most of the other immigrants in Europe, whether Syria, Middle East, Latin America.

    Ukraine is between Zambia and Sierra Leone in corruption ratings. The economic development level is the same as North Africa. The topic of violence. In Israel-Arab conflict, maybe around 50,000 people have been killed in 100 years. In Ukraine, the same number killed in 8 months. Ukraine is more violent than some of the most famous Middle East warzones. In other rankings of civilian violence also higher during peacetime than many Middle Eastern countries.

    For Western Europeans, to have open borders with the Russian empire/postsoviet space, is not such a nonscary topic, that contrasts with accepting refugees from Syria. It is not like opening borders to Japan, New Zealand or Australia.

    Postsoviet Eastern Europe is including a warzone, which even in the most optimistic scenario will have significant long-term costs for Western European taxpayers.

    There are Baltic states which have been successful EU members, but even they are exporting a lot of the organized crime in Europe. Baltic states are also small and had been more developed for centuries already. And then "successful" countries like Poland, have still pulled hundreds of billions of dollars of public money from the Western European countries, which they could have benefited more if the money was expended in their own country than in foreigners' country.


    What general conclusion will you make about the culture of the western EU, based on the case of the German cannibal? He found that the person tastes like pork.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/dec/04/germany.lukeharding
     

    Lol we know, "no one who speaks German could be an evil man".

    Replies: @LatW, @sudden death

    In Israel-Arab conflict, maybe around 50,000 people have been killed in 100 years. In Ukraine, the same number killed in 8 months. Ukraine is more violent than some of the most famous Middle East warzones.

    No, Dim, let’s not pretend that nothing happened here. You know very well that the casualty rate is higher because there was a full scale invasion and all the Soviet made arsenal, that was collected over decades, was all of sudden expended. The carnage would’ve been even bigger if it wasn’t for the Ukrainian air defense. It’s not because of some innate Ukrainian character that this is the case, but more because of the levels of violence they have been subjected to. These people are not worse than some hipster in Moscow or some vatnik imperialist cheering the war on from his couch (oh, not anymore I guess, time to join in!).

    And there is something seriously wrong with the picture where a young man is living in his village but all of a sudden there is a foreign occupier tank in the field right next to his village, all exploded with body parts laying around. Some young men approach this kind of thing with humor, often black humor, to salvage their psyche.

    • Replies: @Dmitry
    @LatW

    It's not about responsibility. Most people from warzone, is usually not responsible for it, in Ukraine, in the Middle East, in East Africa. Some part of people are compassionate to the victims of warzone, another part of people transfer blame for the warzone to its victims.

    For enough years, AP has been my "internet friend", so I know his views about this topic, have been the latter category, where history's victims, are responsible for the crimes against them. He wrote it directly.
    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/sixth-proof/#comment-3206911

    Nowadays Ukraine is a warzone, more dangerous than some of the most famous warzones in the Middle East. It's producing the most refugees in Europe. It's not an antonym to Syria, but Syrian and Ukrainian refugees are in a similar situation.

    AP argues that Eastern Europe is more European than Western Europe, because Western Europe received a lot of foreigners, including non-European refugees like Syrians, that Western Europe should fund Eastern Europe instead of Syrians etc. But from the Western European perspective, the response for Ukrainians is not too different than Syrians.

    I'm an immigrant from the same world. I'm not feeling more deserving the welcome by Western Europeans than any other foreigners. It's not like I can say I'm from a more normal region or culture than any Latin American immigrant going across the Mexico-USA border to live in America. And my difference is that I'm a legal immigrant from a graduate program, with some superficially more elite status, but someone could change the paperwork one day and I could be like any Syrian.

    -

    By the way, what's your theory about Sobchak. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l4o4FakHZkE.

    It's interesting she had given her an Israeli passport immediately (like Abramovich), when for normal people Israel only gives a passport if you live in Israel for a year. It's a bit disillusioning to find people perceived as elite from Russia, are given a different rapid procedure there than the ordinary cattle, even though it is a state democracy with supposed equal laws.

    Replies: @LatW

    , @YetAnotherAnon
    @LatW

    My understanding is that the casualty rate was already pretty high before the invasion, when the Donbass units of the Ukrainian Armed Forces revolted after the 2014 coup, and then the UAF started retaking territory (and enacting street justice on those considered rebels/collaborators).

    The invasion has obviously upped the total casualties, but weren't something like 14,000 civilians killed in the Donbass between 2014 and 2021?

    Replies: @AP

  404. @Mr. Hack
    @Barbarossa

    It is an interesting article. Do you know whether or not electric cars, specifically Teslas, due to the paucity of moving engine parts are easier to maintain and avoid some of the pitfalls of more traditionally designed cars, or do they present their own set of complex problems? Car repair problems 101: Teslas vs porsches (I use posches because they are used as examples in the article you posted).

    Replies: @Philip Owen

    I haven’t seen details for 5 years on the practical maintenance of electric cars but there was an article in IEEE Spectrum around that time which suggested that maintenance was, on the young fleet at the time, dramatically less. The key item of wear is of course the battery. I haven’t looked but it seems to me that there is an insurance opportunity to pay monthly against future battery replacement costs.

    The particular article was enthusiastic about the passing of private cars as the economic case favoured near continuous running over a long life for electrics. (Very little dependency on mileage other than battery). So self driving taxis were suggested as the best economic option for the future of automobiles.

    I am part of the murder team for the smallo autorepair shop as I enabled technology transfer from the European Space Agency of satellite signal and power bus technology into the Bordnetz standard later upgraded for electric vehicles and lithium ion battery management systems (which is why Airbus cockpits don’t have battery fires, just like space craft).

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @Philip Owen


    The key item of wear is of course the battery.
     
    Do you know whether the lifespan of batteries has gone up substantially over say the last 10 years or not? For obvious reasons, I find the idea of having to purchase some kind of monthly insurance to replace a battery ahead of time a financial hassle that I don't want to have any part of . I would think that many current owners of such vehicles probably dump these cars just before the batteries die off. I wonder how this is handled in the secondary used car market? The distributorships must be able to replace the batteries in a costly manner and keep the retail prices down?...

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Barbarossa, @Philip Owen

  405. @A123
    @Barbarossa

    I was intending humor. While Kiwis are zealous about their Marmite, I do not believe they think of it as a religion.

    I noticed the "Sanatarium" branding at one point and thus the manufacturer name.

     
    https://static.countdown.co.nz/assets/product-images/zoom/94149494.jpg
     

    I was unaware that it was associate with the Seventh Day Adventist product.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @Philip Owen

    Marmite, when not the original beef stew in Bavaria, is a British yeast based spread. It has a bitter taste that some people cannot endure. There is an Australian rival called Vegemite. There is also Bovril in the UK. This is a similar product based on beef extract (I don’t know either).

    I have tried Marmite on Russian friends and they say there is something similar in Russia but I have never seen it on sale.

  406. @Dmitry
    @AP


    most of the Chinese in Vancouver have non-mainland origins (mostly Hong Kong, also Taiwan
     
    Wealthy immigrants in Vancouver of the last twenty years, are mainly from mainland China. You were saying they are not "Sovok" (to relate your interest in the Cold War and dislike of the Soviet Union). But as I said in the first reply, these wealthy immigrants that flood Vancouver are mostly mainland Chinese, often children of political elite, closer than most Chinese to Communist Party. Skyscrapers of Vancouver are built with the money which is not far from China's Communist Party.

    It is good when Eastern Europeans get some of that money diverted to help other Europeans, instead of it all being used to fund their western cousins’ own

     

    There are strange claims in this paragraph. Money from Western European taxpayers for convergence funding to the Warsaw Pact, is their taxpayer money, which would be used to pay for schools, transport and hospitals in their country.

    This is the money of the Western European taxpayer. It's not all money which is going to be used as "immigration funding for Syrians", unless you will claim this is the main part of the government budget.

    You could say you prefer Western European taxpayers should use their money to fund someone in Warsaw Pact region than from Syria. But your idea that the opportunity cost for the EU's convergence transfers is "funding Syrians" is sophistry. The Western European taxpayers' money would be used in their country, to build infrastructure and other public spending, which is instead used to fund Eastern Europe.

    From self-interest of Western European taxpayer, it would possibly be more optimal to spend in your own country, than to give your money to Warsaw Pact countries like Poland and Hungary, which most Europeans will never even visit as a tourist.

    If Western Europeans want to give money to another country, it would be less controversial as a private choice. If they want to give money to Poles or Hungarians, then there they can donate their personal income. But the use of public tax money to fund convergence of foreign countries is controversial and it is a reason Boris Johnson has public support to remove UK from the EU.

    At the beginning of the discussion, you were saying it is a good thing about Poland, they in a "beggar position" receiving money from Western Europe.

    EU money has been good for Poland, so it is rational for Poles to want the EU's money. But while it is rational to want to receive the foreigners' money, I don't see how it's an area of pride or indicator of the national virtue to receive foreigners money.


    have a funny tendency to find some weird abnormal phenomenon and make broad and false conclusions about it. Such as the utterly marginal “Mormon” polygamists, and now some Ukrainian soldier who boiled a Russian soldier’s head.

     

    Nobody is generalizing from Ukrainian head boiling. Average Ukrainians are not boiling heads, average Syrians are not cutting off heads either. Syrians and Ukrainians are two examples of people who are victims, living in a dysfunctional and dangerous place, where head cutting and boiling can exist as an extreme example of violence that is happening in the local tribal conflicts.

    You were writing a bit like the Syrian immigrants are somehow antonym to Eastern Europe. Sure, postsoviet space is a different world than the Warsaw Pact. But postsoviet space is nowadays as violent as the Middle East and a lot of Eastern Europe is in postsoviet space, not Warsaw Pact region.

    There is nothing marginal to say Ukrainian reality is not so more civilized than origin of the most of the other immigrants in Europe, whether Syria, Middle East, Latin America.

    Ukraine is between Zambia and Sierra Leone in corruption ratings. The economic development level is the same as North Africa. The topic of violence. In Israel-Arab conflict, maybe around 50,000 people have been killed in 100 years. In Ukraine, the same number killed in 8 months. Ukraine is more violent than some of the most famous Middle East warzones. In other rankings of civilian violence also higher during peacetime than many Middle Eastern countries.

    For Western Europeans, to have open borders with the Russian empire/postsoviet space, is not such a nonscary topic, that contrasts with accepting refugees from Syria. It is not like opening borders to Japan, New Zealand or Australia.

    Postsoviet Eastern Europe is including a warzone, which even in the most optimistic scenario will have significant long-term costs for Western European taxpayers.

    There are Baltic states which have been successful EU members, but even they are exporting a lot of the organized crime in Europe. Baltic states are also small and had been more developed for centuries already. And then "successful" countries like Poland, have still pulled hundreds of billions of dollars of public money from the Western European countries, which they could have benefited more if the money was expended in their own country than in foreigners' country.


    What general conclusion will you make about the culture of the western EU, based on the case of the German cannibal? He found that the person tastes like pork.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/dec/04/germany.lukeharding
     

    Lol we know, "no one who speaks German could be an evil man".

    Replies: @LatW, @sudden death

    The topic of violence. In Israel-Arab conflict, maybe around 50,000 people have been killed in 100 years. In Ukraine, the same number killed in 8 months. Ukraine is more violent than some of the most famous Middle East warzones.

    It probably would not be much of exaggeration to say that military technical level and intensity of battlefield killing (e.g. accuracy and/or amount of artillery) in this war from both sides has been way more higher than in past Middle East conflicts and so far this was the main reason for higher troop bodycounts on the ground, but not some exclusive personal inter-Slavic bloodthirstiness.

    Also remembered reading some RF soldier accounts about artillery usage at the start of modern Syrian 2016-17 campaign, they already had experience of battling 2014-15 non westernized and almost Soviet type UA army at Ilovaisk/Debaltsevo type battles and yet were surprised that they can be relaxed now after shooting shells at Syrian “rebels” compared with UA army which was very quick and accurate in shooting back even then.

    It was clear from many such details, that overall warfare difficulty level was way lower in modern Syria than in UA circa 2014-15 and it was sort of playing several years in lower level league for RF army, which now is struggling when returning into higher quality and more difficult regular army warfare zone.

  407. Marmite, when not the original beef stew in Bavaria, is a British yeast based spread. It has a bitter taste that some people cannot endure. There is an Australian rival called Vegemite

    UK Marmite and New Zealand Marmite are quite different. In the Oceana region, NZ won. The UK version has gone through a number evolutions trying to thread the proverbial needle.

     

     

    There is also Bovril in the UK. This is a similar product based on beef extract (I don’t know either).

    Bovril is a concentrated bullion best known to the rest of the world due to Top Gear & James May. (1)

    During a 2011 episode of Top Gear, James May drank from an urn of Bovril while driving a snowplough in Norway and commented: “We all know that when it’s snowing and it’s cold you have Bovril. That’s a rule of life.”[13] Bovril reappeared in another episode of Top Gear in the form of Jeremy Clarkson’s V8 Food Blender, wherein it was used to make a “Man’s V8 Smoothie” complete with raw beef and brick.

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://culture.fandom.com/wiki/Bovril

  408. @Thulean Friend
    @Barbarossa


    Naturally enough, Sher Singh enjoys trolling everyone on here with Sikh maximalism, but behind the trolling is a valid question; what are you willing to die or be killed for?
     
    I'd take him more seriously if he wasn't yet another diaspora LARPer sitting thousands of miles away from his historic homeland that he claims to care about. Much like the dregs shouting Khalistani slogans in a Toronto suburb, thinking it will bring national salvation to the decrepit status of their stateless people.

    Authenticity is important and whatever flaws Silvio may or may not have, he is at least internally consistent in his politics. Whites in the Anglosphere have melded into one. In Europe, Eastern Europeans are still separate from Germanics and Nords to a greater extent than they are in Canada, Australia, USA etc. So Silvio's politics is in fact rooted in his place, as he shares a common identity with other whites.


    Sikhs, Muslims, Amish etc. have actual beliefs that they take seriously enough to die for
     
    Do sikhs really? Their emigration rates are sky-high. If they really cared so passionately, you'd think they'd stay and fight for their supposed homeland in Punjab.

    I don't mind people leaving to find a better life. It's a natural human instinct. But moving abroad and then brandishing sectarian flags safely ensconced in Canada or Australia while having no real plans to do the actual hard work to fight for the self-determination of your people simply comes across as pathetic and should be called out as such. People like that do not deserve a homeland and they'll never get one either.

    Frankly, I do not understand your sikhophilia. There are many other worthy people who actually fight hard for their right to national sovereignty. Sikhs aren't one of them.

    I repeat: the only martial spirit they have left is the effort they put in to get a Canadian visa. It's time to accept that fact.

    Replies: @sher singh, @sher singh, @Yahya, @Barbarossa

    Authenticity is important and whatever flaws Silvio may or may not have, he is at least internally consistent in his politics. Whites in the Anglosphere have melded into one. In Europe, Eastern Europeans are still separate from Germanics and Nords to a greater extent than they are in Canada, Australia, USA etc. So Silvio’s politics is in fact rooted in his place, as he shares a common identity with other whites.

    Yes but you are forgetting that silviosilver is, by his own admission, a non-white Balkanoid who looks more like a Turk or Arab rather than a Slavic-looking “Eastern European” in a traditional sense. So his identification with whites is more of a “house nigger” type situation than a “common identity” based on racial similarities. Anglos, Germanics and Nords aren’t really his people, as I think he’ll readily admit, so his constant shilling for whites (and occasional denigration of people racially closer to him) is nothing to be admired, and is quite pathetic actually if you think about it.

    • Replies: @Yevardian
    @Yahya


    Yes but you are forgetting that silviosilver is, by his own admission, a non-white Balkanoid who looks more like a Turk or Arab rather than a Slavic-looking “Eastern European” in a traditional sense. So his identification with whites is more of a “house nigger” type situation than a “common identity” based on racial similarities.
     
    Dunno if he said that directly, but as you well know and even covertly boasted about regarding your family, it's hard to talk about any 'typical' looking Turk, Arab, Armenian or indeed most MENA people. Even within tiny subgroups you find massive variation. Compare the Palestinian Christians George Habash and Richard Hanania, in Europe you could not believe those people came from the same ethnicity.

    Anyway, I disagree. It's healthy and normal to identity with the politics and worldview of the country in which you were born above an ancestral culture of which he likely has never lived or even speaks the language. And yes, within Anglo countries all 'whites' merge identity within a generation or two, Asians are harder but they do try, Indians, Muslims and Jews could but usually don't want to. Its just blacks that are both totally incapable and unwilling to assimilate, shown from repeated experiences around the world. Perhaps they subconsciously sense that in aggregate they can't compete.
    Incidentally, this just reinforces my view that pajeet immigration is probably the single biggest longterm threat to Western Civilisation.
    On that, I noticed the new 'British' PM, a has-been country whose politics I normally pay zero interest, but the recent clown-show grabbed my attention. My first superficial impressions were he came across as very competent, measured and professional (in striking contrast to his predecessors), and that he and his colleagues look and behave nothing like the Indians in Australia, which seem to be more representative of the general pajeet population. Even after Truss, its a new low to have a 'British' Hindu PM married to the daughter of a foreign billionaire. Even Disraeli's parents nominally converted.

    Replies: @Sher Singh, @silviosilver

    , @silviosilver
    @Yahya


    So his identification with whites is more of a “house nigger” type situation than a “common identity” based on racial similarities.
     
    It would be, if that's what I was actually doing. But I'm not doing that. I'm not knocking on their door, begging to be let in. They (WNs) came to me, not the other way around. I originally mightily resented their intrusion into my world, claiming my peeps for their cause. Firstly, because I thought that would create completely unnecessary racial division and insecurity among my own people, and secondly, because even if we were all included, it would indeed be as you say - those on the margins feeling like second class citizens, barely tolerated and looked down on. What kind of a fool would willingly put himself in a situation like that?

    Back when I thought 'racism' was wrong, it's because I thought the inevitable outcome was something like a rerun of nazi Europe, so I wasn't even willing to hear out the WN case. When I actually calmed down enough to examine it, I eventually concluded that okay, I might have severe misgivings about what these people stand for, but it was undeniable they had a moral case. If I believe that, what am I supposed to do, close my eyes to it and keep deceiving others and myself about the glories of multiracialism? My feeling is they - anglos, nothern europeans, call them what you will - did right by me (eventually anyway, lol), so it's only fair I should do right by them. So yes, I will "shill" for their cause, not just because it's a moral cause in its own right, but because given their existing demographic weight (still a majority in my country), they're essential to any hope of racial separation, "racial living," living in a society composed of your own kind.

    If I feel that way , why don't I just "go back home" where I'll be surrounded by my own kind? Well I tried that, on two separate occasions in the 2000s, which was enough to kill off any vestigial attachment to my supposed "homeland." I decided I liked it better being a racial outsider but cultural insider (much less of a racial outsider now compared to then, my own experiences teach me) than a racial insider but cultural outsider, which is what I felt like. So if "home" for me is in the diaspora, then why not rearrange the diaspora to better suit me? If I had video game-like absolute dictatorial power, I would set up racially exclusive diaspora "statelets" tomorrow, with ample provision for those who actually want to persist in the multiracial diversity dream to live their way too. It's a win-win for everyone.

    Now listen, arabs are far from some unknown quantity to me, such that I have to rely on (heavily biased) WN reports about you. For a long time my very best friends were these two Lebanese brothers and one of their cousins. Very loyal friends, cannot fault them. As you can probably imagine, a lot of the time I spent with them involved interactions with their wider families and the wider Lebanese community general. Those experiences make me want to spit when I hear guff about "arab hospitality." Hospitality?!?!? From those fuckers? Lol. You had better update them that I look exactly like them, because they seemingly unfailingly identified me before I uttered a peep, and proceeded to treat me coldly and suspiciously. Way more likely to get an insulting "who are you?" (meaning "what are you doing here?") than a warm greeting. The parents (and older types) were the worst. I suppose living in the diaspora was a bitter experience for them, and things would be different back in the Levant, but when you've gone through as much as I have with these fuckwits, you just don't care anymore.
  409. @LatW
    @Dmitry


    In Israel-Arab conflict, maybe around 50,000 people have been killed in 100 years. In Ukraine, the same number killed in 8 months. Ukraine is more violent than some of the most famous Middle East warzones.
     
    No, Dim, let's not pretend that nothing happened here. You know very well that the casualty rate is higher because there was a full scale invasion and all the Soviet made arsenal, that was collected over decades, was all of sudden expended. The carnage would've been even bigger if it wasn't for the Ukrainian air defense. It's not because of some innate Ukrainian character that this is the case, but more because of the levels of violence they have been subjected to. These people are not worse than some hipster in Moscow or some vatnik imperialist cheering the war on from his couch (oh, not anymore I guess, time to join in!).

    And there is something seriously wrong with the picture where a young man is living in his village but all of a sudden there is a foreign occupier tank in the field right next to his village, all exploded with body parts laying around. Some young men approach this kind of thing with humor, often black humor, to salvage their psyche.

    Replies: @Dmitry, @YetAnotherAnon

    It’s not about responsibility. Most people from warzone, is usually not responsible for it, in Ukraine, in the Middle East, in East Africa. Some part of people are compassionate to the victims of warzone, another part of people transfer blame for the warzone to its victims.

    For enough years, AP has been my “internet friend”, so I know his views about this topic, have been the latter category, where history’s victims, are responsible for the crimes against them. He wrote it directly.
    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/sixth-proof/#comment-3206911

    Nowadays Ukraine is a warzone, more dangerous than some of the most famous warzones in the Middle East. It’s producing the most refugees in Europe. It’s not an antonym to Syria, but Syrian and Ukrainian refugees are in a similar situation.

    AP argues that Eastern Europe is more European than Western Europe, because Western Europe received a lot of foreigners, including non-European refugees like Syrians, that Western Europe should fund Eastern Europe instead of Syrians etc. But from the Western European perspective, the response for Ukrainians is not too different than Syrians.

    I’m an immigrant from the same world. I’m not feeling more deserving the welcome by Western Europeans than any other foreigners. It’s not like I can say I’m from a more normal region or culture than any Latin American immigrant going across the Mexico-USA border to live in America. And my difference is that I’m a legal immigrant from a graduate program, with some superficially more elite status, but someone could change the paperwork one day and I could be like any Syrian.

    By the way, what’s your theory about Sobchak. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l4o4FakHZkE.

    It’s interesting she had given her an Israeli passport immediately (like Abramovich), when for normal people Israel only gives a passport if you live in Israel for a year. It’s a bit disillusioning to find people perceived as elite from Russia, are given a different rapid procedure there than the ordinary cattle, even though it is a state democracy with supposed equal laws.

    • Replies: @LatW
    @Dmitry


    Most people from warzone, is usually not responsible for it, in Ukraine, in the Middle East, in East Africa. Some part of people are compassionate to the victims of warzone, another part of people transfer blame for the warzone to its victims.
     
    Look, I was just trying to say that Eastern Slavic people have historically been subjected to exorbitant amounts of violence, that doesn't mean they are somehow more violent as people. There are many Ukrainians of various backgrounds, who have never been in the military, who have been pushed into this, doctors, software engineers, all kinds of professions.


    For enough years, AP has been my “internet friend”, so I know his views about this topic, have been the latter category, where history’s victims, are responsible for the crimes against them. He wrote it directly.
     
    I know, I didn't mean to interfere. I simply said that the most advanced arsenal on the planet (both Soviet & Western made, as well as Ukrainian made) is at work right now, which is extremely unfortunate, so the casualties are higher. I think some in the West do see this, thus they are sympathetic. And, yes, there are parallels with Syria, ofc.

    But from the Western European perspective, the response for Ukrainians is not too different than Syrians.
     
    It's hard to say, maybe you're right, but it looks like in some cases Ukrainians are favored because this seems very unjust and because they are EEs who at least seem to support democracy. This may sound trite, but there is something to it. I also suspect that some liberals in the West support them because it's safe to support a smaller white population that is attacked by somebody much larger and authoritarian.

    Sobchak
     
    Ivan Yakovina is a good analyst whom I enjoy following, so I trust his insight, although I wasn't aware that she was going to be sanctioned. The system has swallowed and ground up most of the real opposition and the screws are only being tightened now. But it's strange that they would attack her (apparently they raided her apartment, what for?), she's never struck me as all too "dangerous". Could it be that she just wanted to leave and asked her dad to get her an Israeli passport and to stage this exit? Or her family has some connections to groups that the administration doesn't trust? No idea. Afaik, they just changed her status to witness so she could come back? Tbh, she hasn't been the focus of my attention lately.

    Btw, did you see this, don't know if this is true:

    https://verstka.media/sotrudniki-vedomstv-begut-ot-mobilizacii/

    Replies: @Dmitry

  410. @Barbarossa
    @silviosilver

    To be honest, I'm more sympathetic to Sher Singh's worldview than yours. As you've mentioned with your story with the bouncer and the girl you were hitting on, you'll act in an expedient way which only adds to societal breakdown. Though a racialist, you seem to be a liberal at heart.

    Extreme attitudes and measures are needed to resist the real existential threats of multicultural hyper-individualistic liberalism. The first of these measures is the cultivation of a sense of honor and the application of that in your community. If you want different social norms you'll have to be the one to model it, since no one else will do it for you. It can spread from there, which is why tribalism is far superior and meaningful, especially in this age, than racialism.

    Naturally enough, Sher Singh enjoys trolling everyone on here with Sikh maximalism, but behind the trolling is a valid question; what are you willing to die or be killed for? If the real answer is nothing, then perhaps it's time to examine why that is the case. This doesn't mean that honor is primarily about killing or being killed, but questions like this are a gauge of seriousness. If you have no principles that you are willing to die for, then you only have empty preferences, not ethics or honor. Sadly, there is no future there.

    If someday (though I seriously doubt it) a bunch of Sikhs try to take over my corner of the world, they'll probably find stiffer resistance than from some exurb Canadian wimplings, but hey then again, maybe facing armed subjugation would teach people to care about something serious. It may be incomprehensible to people so jaded, but Sikhs, Muslims, Amish etc. have actual beliefs that they take seriously enough to die for. Absent that level of commitment it's all just empty materialism.

    So yeah, I don't mind discussing the weather.

    Replies: @Thulean Friend, @Emil Nikola Richard, @Mikel

    Sikhs, Muslims, Amish etc. have actual beliefs that they take seriously enough to die for. Absent that level of commitment it’s all just empty materialism.

    I seriously disagree with this point.

    Humanity doesn’t need more people willing to die and kill for political or religious issues, it needs to move past that ancestral tradition. I used to think that we were slowly moving in that direction after the end of the Cold War, the expansion of the EU to countries that used to be enemies for centuries and the globalized trade of the past decades but sadly, it was just a period of calm before the storm, as we’re now witnessing.

    It may be beyond the capabilities of the human species, absent some future genetic reprogramming, but the problem with continuing to war among ourselves for “beliefs” is that technological progress made us enter a completely new era 77 years ago where the possibility of destroying civilized life on the planet in one of those wars became real. For 40 years we toyed with Armaggedon in a clash between the beliefs in capitalism/democracy versus communism and now we have entered a new era where we are again toying with the same catastrophe for even more trivial beliefs, hardly more consequential than a pissing contest.

    We are probably not capable of destroying our own species in a war yet but, as time progresses, I see no reason why we won’t reach that capability so learning to avoid wars between nations, tribes and religious or political groups is more than just preventing the senseless massacres that we have experienced throughout history, it’s a necessary condition for the ultimate preservation of our species.

    From this perspective, materialism may not be a very worthy ideal per se but if it leads people in the advanced countries to reject the idea of dying and killing for “beliefs”, it may be a positive development.

    • Agree: silviosilver
    • Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Mikel

    Have you ever asked your friends, acquaintances, family members about their idea of purpose in life? It never ceases to astonish me the percentage of people who don't even think it might be an issue.

    Friends Romans and countrymen if you have a purpose of establishing successors good for you. It ain't my thing but unless your purpose in life is utterly Satanic then any purpose is far far better than none.

    Replies: @Mikel, @Barbarossa

    , @Sher Singh
    @Mikel

    You can't rape women you nuke.
    Your objections to war are solved.

    , @Barbarossa
    @Mikel

    I understand your point completely. However, it seems that absent questions of religious or cultural conflicts people will continue to find things to kill each other over. The 20th century was extremely bloody and we'll see about the 21st. I'm pretty convinced that materialistic ideas about the perfectibility of man are complete bunk.

    I'm not at all convinced that the inter-tribal style warfare of the pre-nation state era was any less violent on balance than the modern world. Now we just have a greater population which is more completely insulated from the consequences of war. Materialism doesn't really seem to mean that wars are less likely to happen it just concentrates the reasons into more strictly economic and "utilitarian" reasons.

    , @silviosilver
    @Mikel


    it’s a necessary condition for the ultimate preservation of our species.
     
    I agree with everything in this post (which is why I hit the Agree button) except this statement, and it's more that I think it requires refinement than a case of outright disagreement.

    If 'my race,' however narrowly or broadly you want to define it, isn't going to figure in the future - as all trends suggest it will not - then I just can't get that excited about the preservation of the species.

    A thought experiment: If you died and came back in a thousand or ten thousand or a hundred thousand years and you found that everyone on the planet was what you today would recognize as racially African, you may insist that the species has been preserved, but would you really find that a relief? A joy? Really?

    Personally, I'd be devastated. Now, if those future Africans defied the naysayers and actually managed to "build Wakanda," I might feel a little less devastated, in fact, I'd probably be interested to learn something about their achievements and the workings of that society, but I'd hardly be elated. Compare whatever your own feelings are about that to what your feelings might be if that future included your own kind in it. It's a telling difference, isn't it?

    Of course, all-African or not are not the only two possibilities. I would feel considerably less devastated if the future were all-Asian, but that would still leave me a long way off elation. In any future in which "my race" as it exists today doesn't figure, it's only when you get to something like an araby or latinxy kinda mix that my feelings would switch from negative to positive - you know, not exactly my own kind, but then again not really all that far off either, and if they've also got some decent achievements to go along with their mere existence, then I imagine I would feel quite good about it. (And like any 'racist' worth his salt, I would of course comfort myself by insisting it was my race's contribution to the mix that made all the good things possible hehe.)

    Replies: @Mikel

    , @Coconuts
    @Mikel


    Humanity doesn’t need more people willing to die and kill for political or religious issues, it needs to move past that ancestral tradition.
     
    One way of seeing this is as the idea of liberal pacification and the end of politics; the only discussions that will take place in such a universal human society will be similar to those between academics in their professional capacity, or purely technical in nature between specialists similar to engineering discussions. There won't be any conflicts of interest that gives rise to the formation of competing groups and the friend/enemy group distinction anywhere.

    (From some points of view this conception seems like a secularisation of the older Christian tradition about Providence (into Progress) and the advent of the Kingdom of God (pacified Humanity). Reading about the Enlightenment and then German Idealism in Hegel and Fichte, later Marx's materialism, it sometimes feels like watching how this secularisation took place.)

    Understanding of evolution and human evolution specifically raises questions about how plausible the advent of this universal state of pacification is. Possibly it is not even a possibility given the kind of animal humans are.

    Attempts to bring it into existence in reality may end up more like a kind of universal despotism and mouse utopia, where conditions are so mismatched for normal human reproduction that large parts of the human population dies away through sterility, illness and evolutionarily aberrant behaviour. Good for the perpetuation of the genes of the survivors though?


    We are probably not capable of destroying our own species in a war yet but, as time progresses, I see no reason why we won’t reach that capability so learning to avoid wars between nations, tribes and religious or political groups is more than just preventing the senseless massacres that we have experienced throughout history, it’s a necessary condition for the ultimate preservation of our species.
     
    This is part of the argument for things like archaeofuturism; the Enlightenment state ceases to represent 'the externalisation of mankind's reason' or the instrument of infinite Progress ('God standing on earth') and becomes a major threat in itself.

    Replies: @Beckow, @Mikel

  411. @Mikel
    @Barbarossa


    Sikhs, Muslims, Amish etc. have actual beliefs that they take seriously enough to die for. Absent that level of commitment it’s all just empty materialism.
     
    I seriously disagree with this point.

    Humanity doesn't need more people willing to die and kill for political or religious issues, it needs to move past that ancestral tradition. I used to think that we were slowly moving in that direction after the end of the Cold War, the expansion of the EU to countries that used to be enemies for centuries and the globalized trade of the past decades but sadly, it was just a period of calm before the storm, as we're now witnessing.

    It may be beyond the capabilities of the human species, absent some future genetic reprogramming, but the problem with continuing to war among ourselves for "beliefs" is that technological progress made us enter a completely new era 77 years ago where the possibility of destroying civilized life on the planet in one of those wars became real. For 40 years we toyed with Armaggedon in a clash between the beliefs in capitalism/democracy versus communism and now we have entered a new era where we are again toying with the same catastrophe for even more trivial beliefs, hardly more consequential than a pissing contest.

    We are probably not capable of destroying our own species in a war yet but, as time progresses, I see no reason why we won't reach that capability so learning to avoid wars between nations, tribes and religious or political groups is more than just preventing the senseless massacres that we have experienced throughout history, it's a necessary condition for the ultimate preservation of our species.

    From this perspective, materialism may not be a very worthy ideal per se but if it leads people in the advanced countries to reject the idea of dying and killing for "beliefs", it may be a positive development.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Sher Singh, @Barbarossa, @silviosilver, @Coconuts

    Have you ever asked your friends, acquaintances, family members about their idea of purpose in life? It never ceases to astonish me the percentage of people who don’t even think it might be an issue.

    Friends Romans and countrymen if you have a purpose of establishing successors good for you. It ain’t my thing but unless your purpose in life is utterly Satanic then any purpose is far far better than none.

    • Replies: @Mikel
    @Emil Nikola Richard


    Have you ever asked your friends, acquaintances, family members about their idea of purpose in life?
     
    Actually yes. A friend of mine and I recently concluded in a whatsapp conversation that the only sensible purpose in life is trying to enjoy our circumstances to the fullest extent possible (in totally different ways, given our respective proclivities). Not a very groundbreaking conclusion but a proof perhaps that social media can provide some positive results when used appropriately.

    Google translation of the Isabel Allende quote he sent me that sparked the conversation:


    I realized at some point that one comes into the world to lose everything. The longer one lives, the more he loses. First you lose your parents, people around you, your pets, places and your own faculties too. You can't live in fear, because it makes you imagine what hasn't happened yet and you suffer twice as much. You have to relax a bit, try to enjoy what we have and live in the present.
     
    , @Barbarossa
    @Emil Nikola Richard

    One of my daily prayers asks that I would uphold the honor of those who have come before me and be a worthy example for those that follow me.

    That seems like a reasonable place to start, and could be applied even by someone with no belief in God. Of course, a lack of belief in God or anything transcendent makes it a bit harder to muster the ambition to apply such a formula!

  412. @Mr. Hack
    @Dmitry


    If you read in the ex-Mormon forums, some Mormons there are writing they feel instinctively fear of coffee, even years after they exit the cult. There is a thread where they are talking about how they feel a nervous tension when they drink coffee.
     
    Like the Seventh Day Adventists, the shunning of coffee by the Mormons was steeped in the belief that coffee was bad for ones health. The ability to keep ones body as healthy as possible through diet and lifestyle was put into action by keeping the human body as pure as possible as it is believed was attested to through Corinthians 6:19-20 (ESV), as an admonition, “Or do you not know that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit within you, whom you have from God? You are not your own, for you were bought with a price. So glorify God in your body.”

    The problem with this observance is that it seems every time you turn around today, there is evidence that coffee includes many healthful attributes. The coffee prohibitions were promulgated during a time when coffee was seen as only a drink that included caffeine, which in itself is controversial, as caffeine itself (in moderation) is also seen today as an acceptable stimulant that many athletes use in their sports regimens. Many medical health gurus that you can view on YouTube are now advocating the drinking of coffee for health reasons.

    Replies: @Dmitry

    Tea and coffee are healthy because it requires heating water to level that usually deactivates pathogenic microorganisms which are sometimes in water.

    In the ex-Mormon forum, they talk often about the health damage and parasites they receive in their missions. They are talking about how they received giardia parasites from drinking water in Latin America, in Russia, in Philippines. Some are talking about health effects from dirty water years after they finished their missions in those countries.

    Allowing tea and coffee, could have reduced risk to some extent. But who said the cults’ rules, should be rational? More irrational rules can increase cost to be in the cult, increase commitment in the cult, increase conditioning for obedience of the followers. You can also notice not every rule Haredi Jews are following, will seem very rational from the perspective of science and reason.

    coffee prohibitions were promulgated during a time when coffee was seen as only a drink that included caffeine, which in itself is controversial, as caffeine

    They allow to drink caffeine including Red Bull or Coca Cola. https://tinyurl.com/39vt2nxy

    But tea and coffee are a taboo. And as a basic of human psychology, therefore tea and coffee are becoming hype for many of them after they exit.

    • Replies: @Mikhail
    @Dmitry

    Does that include boiled water after it's cooled like in home brewing ice tea?

  413. @Thulean Friend
    BYD will be the first major Chinese car brand to compete worldwide.

    BYD smashes profit record ahead of European push

    Tesla’s main Chinese challenger BYD has shrugged off supply disruptions as well as foreign and domestic rivals to achieve year-on-year earnings growth of 350 per cent, underscoring the rapid rise of one of China’s most formidable industrial conglomerates.

    The Warren Buffett-backed group’s third-quarter net profit of Rmb5.7bn ($786mn) smashed its previous record of Rmb2.8bn set in the second quarter of this year. The results come just as BYD mounts an aggressive campaign to take on European automakers on their home turf.


    BYD is now among a clutch of Chinese companies posing an existential challenge to electric vehicle industry leader Tesla and incumbent auto titans as the world transitions to EVs. The Shenzhen-based company is highly self-sufficient, controlling its local supply chain of minerals and batteries as well as computer chips and other electronics. Rival Tesla is among its battery customers.


     

    Replies: @A123, @Yahya

    Iirc, you work in finance, so I assume you know a thing or two about stock market investing. I’ve been on a flurry of activity recently, after seeing the 20-30% decline of stock indices over the past year as an opportunity to scoop up some bargains. I’ve found 3 investable companies so far, one of which i’ve been tracking for a year now, waiting for its price to go down below a certain level so as to provide an adequate margin of safety. The other two came to me by chance and random research.

    [MORE]

    1) Adidas AG

    A company that needs no introduction. It has a sustainable competitive advantage owing to its formidable brand and global name recognition; as well as 2,500 wide store footprint. People generally do not want to buy shoes from unknown brands or suppliers, so they stick to 3 or 4 main ones like Nike, Puma, Skechers and Adidas. Adidas’ competitive advantage is reflected in their fairly respectable 9-12% FCF margin (I prefer to use Free Cash Flow as the key indicator of profitability instead of Net Income; it’s more reliable and less prone to fudging, though it does have its limitations). The other major athletic footwear companies throw out less FCF than Adidas, and only Nike achieves more profitably (~15%) owing to its superior marketing and operational efficiency. But that means there’s room for improvement on the margins front for Adidas, and in fact one of the key targets outlined by the CEO is to improve the companies’ operating margins (though he has failed to do so in his tenure, and will be removed in 2023 from his post, two years earlier than his contract). In 2021 Adidas achieved a solid 34% ROE (according to my calculations, which again uses FCF instead of net income), which is higher than usual for the company, which averaged 19% over the past 7 years. This was due to an increase in margins (and a slight congruent decrease in asset turnover), as well as increased leverage (equity multiplier increased from 2.2 to 3 during the period). I liked the CEO’s compensation structure, which decreases his compensation if he fails to achieve certain growth and operating margin metrics. Also liked that they planned to buyback shares in the company over the next several years, which is especially fortuitous given the recent decrease in stock price. One key downside though is that the present CEO seems to be mediocre, though he is on the way out in 2023.

    2) Hennes & Mauritz (H&M) AB

    Another fashion company which saw its stock hammered over the past year, imo putting it in bargain territory. Its decline seems to stem from temporary factors such as supply chain issues, an inventory glut in the fast-fashion industry, China’s COVID lockdown, and Russia sanctions which forced it to shut down its stores in that country. Though revenues for the 9 month period of 2022 were roughly comparable to 2021, margins were down by nearly 50% owing to the factors mentioned above. Again I think these are mostly temporary in nature and margins should return to H&M’s normalized levels in the near future. The company averaged a solid 33% over the past 7 years, though it too levered its balance sheet to increase its equity multiplier (which nearly doubled from 1.5 to 3) and boost ROE. Top line growth averaged 2.5% over the past 7 years, which is one key downside I took into consideration. Also the CEO seems to be a typical Swedish uber-conformist SJW who spent more time writing about ESG and Diversity & Inclusion than operational efficiency or return on capital in her CEO letter – never a good sign; though perhaps it’s too early to tell how she will perform (she only took over in 2020).

    3) Integrated Diagnostic Holdings (IDH)

    This is an Egyptian company that also lists on the London Stock Exchange. The company is run by a female, which is pretty rare in the Arab world, but she seems to be extremely competent judging by her performance. Thankfully she is more interested in delivering a good return for her shareholders rather than diversity and inclusion. She also owns 26.7% of the company, having recently upped her stake in August 2022, always a good sign. Revenues have gone down 15% y-o-y due to loss of COVID testing revenues, but that was already expected and baked into the price. The company continues to expand its branches and number of conventional testing. FCF margins have been excellent over the past three years, averaging in the mid-20s. ROE likewise is stellar, especially considering that leverage is quite low (1.5 EM). Overall this is the stock I expect to perform best over the next 20 years owing to its growth potential and managerial competence. On the other hand, as a company which primarily operates in the Third World, it is liable to political instability and currency devaluations, its two major risks. Its also possible that new technologies upend the industry and change its profitability and economic dynamics. These i’ve taken into account before investing in IDH.

    Anyhow, feel free to follow me in investing in these companies. I’m not going to mention the price i paid for them, except to say all of them were around 10 P/FCF when I bought them. Obviously if you wish to purchase them, you should do your own research and come to your own conclusions. Also my time horizon is quite long, so I don’t care if their price goes down over the next year or two. I think they are highly likely to appreciate in 10 years time. which is how long I plan to keep them (and more if appropriate).

  414. @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Mikel

    Have you ever asked your friends, acquaintances, family members about their idea of purpose in life? It never ceases to astonish me the percentage of people who don't even think it might be an issue.

    Friends Romans and countrymen if you have a purpose of establishing successors good for you. It ain't my thing but unless your purpose in life is utterly Satanic then any purpose is far far better than none.

    Replies: @Mikel, @Barbarossa

    Have you ever asked your friends, acquaintances, family members about their idea of purpose in life?

    Actually yes. A friend of mine and I recently concluded in a whatsapp conversation that the only sensible purpose in life is trying to enjoy our circumstances to the fullest extent possible (in totally different ways, given our respective proclivities). Not a very groundbreaking conclusion but a proof perhaps that social media can provide some positive results when used appropriately.

    Google translation of the Isabel Allende quote he sent me that sparked the conversation:

    I realized at some point that one comes into the world to lose everything. The longer one lives, the more he loses. First you lose your parents, people around you, your pets, places and your own faculties too. You can’t live in fear, because it makes you imagine what hasn’t happened yet and you suffer twice as much. You have to relax a bit, try to enjoy what we have and live in the present.

  415. @Mikel
    @Barbarossa


    Sikhs, Muslims, Amish etc. have actual beliefs that they take seriously enough to die for. Absent that level of commitment it’s all just empty materialism.
     
    I seriously disagree with this point.

    Humanity doesn't need more people willing to die and kill for political or religious issues, it needs to move past that ancestral tradition. I used to think that we were slowly moving in that direction after the end of the Cold War, the expansion of the EU to countries that used to be enemies for centuries and the globalized trade of the past decades but sadly, it was just a period of calm before the storm, as we're now witnessing.

    It may be beyond the capabilities of the human species, absent some future genetic reprogramming, but the problem with continuing to war among ourselves for "beliefs" is that technological progress made us enter a completely new era 77 years ago where the possibility of destroying civilized life on the planet in one of those wars became real. For 40 years we toyed with Armaggedon in a clash between the beliefs in capitalism/democracy versus communism and now we have entered a new era where we are again toying with the same catastrophe for even more trivial beliefs, hardly more consequential than a pissing contest.

    We are probably not capable of destroying our own species in a war yet but, as time progresses, I see no reason why we won't reach that capability so learning to avoid wars between nations, tribes and religious or political groups is more than just preventing the senseless massacres that we have experienced throughout history, it's a necessary condition for the ultimate preservation of our species.

    From this perspective, materialism may not be a very worthy ideal per se but if it leads people in the advanced countries to reject the idea of dying and killing for "beliefs", it may be a positive development.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Sher Singh, @Barbarossa, @silviosilver, @Coconuts

    You can’t rape women you nuke.
    Your objections to war are solved.

    • Agree: Mikel
  416. @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Mikel

    Have you ever asked your friends, acquaintances, family members about their idea of purpose in life? It never ceases to astonish me the percentage of people who don't even think it might be an issue.

    Friends Romans and countrymen if you have a purpose of establishing successors good for you. It ain't my thing but unless your purpose in life is utterly Satanic then any purpose is far far better than none.

    Replies: @Mikel, @Barbarossa

    One of my daily prayers asks that I would uphold the honor of those who have come before me and be a worthy example for those that follow me.

    That seems like a reasonable place to start, and could be applied even by someone with no belief in God. Of course, a lack of belief in God or anything transcendent makes it a bit harder to muster the ambition to apply such a formula!

  417. @Barbarossa
    @Thulean Friend

    I don't really know much about Rishi Sunak, but is this guy really "Indian" in a deep seated way or is his true loyalty to the international system which makes him filthy rich?
    Is the guy anything but another interchangeable deracinated "citizen of the world" when one gets down to it?

    Replies: @AnonfromTN, @Bashibuzuk

    • Replies: @Barbarossa
    @Bashibuzuk

    Thanks. Yeah, I thought he just looked like the type. Like if Mitt Romney happened to be a friggin' Hindu!

    The smarmy seems strong in that one.

  418. @Dmitry
    @Thulean Friend

    I doubt there is kind of "national conspiracy" of Indian immigrants to conquer the Western governments. Especially as the Indian immigrants are often from Africa or other areas of the British empire, not even directly from India. The parents of UK's new leader are Hindus from Africa. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rishi_Sunak

    Indian and Chinese immigrants are both flooding the West. Indian immigrants are often higher income and more ambitious than Chinese immigrants, so it was likely they would have the leader of a Western country before the Chinese immigrants. Although there was a Chinese-American who was presidential candidate in America in 2020.

    There a lot of wealthy Chinese immigrants hiding in the West, but the wealthy Chinese people seem usually more from China's political elite who are quietly moving their money to the West, their children might go to art college and their life is going to expensive restaurants.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

    The parents of UK’s new leader are Hindus from Africa

    Kamala’s grand parents as well.

    https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2019-10-25/how-kamala-harris-indian-family-shaped-her-political-career

  419. @Thulean Friend
    @Barbarossa


    Naturally enough, Sher Singh enjoys trolling everyone on here with Sikh maximalism, but behind the trolling is a valid question; what are you willing to die or be killed for?
     
    I'd take him more seriously if he wasn't yet another diaspora LARPer sitting thousands of miles away from his historic homeland that he claims to care about. Much like the dregs shouting Khalistani slogans in a Toronto suburb, thinking it will bring national salvation to the decrepit status of their stateless people.

    Authenticity is important and whatever flaws Silvio may or may not have, he is at least internally consistent in his politics. Whites in the Anglosphere have melded into one. In Europe, Eastern Europeans are still separate from Germanics and Nords to a greater extent than they are in Canada, Australia, USA etc. So Silvio's politics is in fact rooted in his place, as he shares a common identity with other whites.


    Sikhs, Muslims, Amish etc. have actual beliefs that they take seriously enough to die for
     
    Do sikhs really? Their emigration rates are sky-high. If they really cared so passionately, you'd think they'd stay and fight for their supposed homeland in Punjab.

    I don't mind people leaving to find a better life. It's a natural human instinct. But moving abroad and then brandishing sectarian flags safely ensconced in Canada or Australia while having no real plans to do the actual hard work to fight for the self-determination of your people simply comes across as pathetic and should be called out as such. People like that do not deserve a homeland and they'll never get one either.

    Frankly, I do not understand your sikhophilia. There are many other worthy people who actually fight hard for their right to national sovereignty. Sikhs aren't one of them.

    I repeat: the only martial spirit they have left is the effort they put in to get a Canadian visa. It's time to accept that fact.

    Replies: @sher singh, @sher singh, @Yahya, @Barbarossa

    I’d take him more seriously if he wasn’t yet another diaspora LARPer sitting thousands of miles away from his historic homeland that he claims to care about.

    Trust me, I’ve had the same thought and don’t discount it. I don’t honestly know how seriously to take Sher Singh, since I don’t really know him. I’m not really in a position to judge how much of a LARPer he may be, so I leave that aside.

    having no real plans to do the actual hard work to fight for the self-determination of your people simply comes across as pathetic and should be called out as such.

    That may be true for all I know. As I’ve said before, I’m not exactly quaking in my boots waiting for the inevitable Sikh deluge from the Great White North. If they manage to take over Canada or any other place, I’ll be duly impressed, I suppose.

    He has a strong trolling component, as we all know, but I find the trolling interesting at times. It asks some interesting questions about modern attitudes and society, which even if framed in insulting ways are worth consideration.

    I personally regard the greatest evil as the relentless homogenization of globalism, so I’m honestly somewhat rooting for any group that resists that.

    • Replies: @Sher Singh
    @Barbarossa

    Liberalism tries to territorialize ideologies it can't fully assimilate or control.
    I've never said I have a nationalist bent or a historic homeland.

    All that's been discussed is sincerity in religious belief or practice.
    That is paramount and without doubt or question.

    https://www.jstor.org/stable/25482019

    Or will Thulean claim I don't wear a Turban & keep a Kirpan?

    At that point, he'll go on demoralizing about the size or efficacy of it.

    --
    We need some minimum standards for who can (validly) discuss politics.
    Unless you lift weights & carry weapons your opinions are worth less than 0.
    If it's 'illegal' for you then you have no right to lecture others.
    Do something about it with your group or stfu with any collective discussion.

    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ

  420. @Barbarossa
    @Thulean Friend


    I’d take him more seriously if he wasn’t yet another diaspora LARPer sitting thousands of miles away from his historic homeland that he claims to care about.
     
    Trust me, I've had the same thought and don't discount it. I don't honestly know how seriously to take Sher Singh, since I don't really know him. I'm not really in a position to judge how much of a LARPer he may be, so I leave that aside.

    having no real plans to do the actual hard work to fight for the self-determination of your people simply comes across as pathetic and should be called out as such.

     

    That may be true for all I know. As I've said before, I'm not exactly quaking in my boots waiting for the inevitable Sikh deluge from the Great White North. If they manage to take over Canada or any other place, I'll be duly impressed, I suppose.

    He has a strong trolling component, as we all know, but I find the trolling interesting at times. It asks some interesting questions about modern attitudes and society, which even if framed in insulting ways are worth consideration.

    I personally regard the greatest evil as the relentless homogenization of globalism, so I'm honestly somewhat rooting for any group that resists that.

    Replies: @Sher Singh

    Liberalism tries to territorialize ideologies it can’t fully assimilate or control.
    I’ve never said I have a nationalist bent or a historic homeland.

    All that’s been discussed is sincerity in religious belief or practice.
    That is paramount and without doubt or question.

    https://www.jstor.org/stable/25482019

    Or will Thulean claim I don’t wear a Turban & keep a Kirpan?

    At that point, he’ll go on demoralizing about the size or efficacy of it.


    We need some minimum standards for who can (validly) discuss politics.
    Unless you lift weights & carry weapons your opinions are worth less than 0.
    If it’s ‘illegal’ for you then you have no right to lecture others.
    Do something about it with your group or stfu with any collective discussion.

    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ

  421. @LatW
    @S


    They’ve also been presented with a crazy false dichotomy, ie either willfully accept your murder as a people (ie genocide in the truest sense of that much abused term via crudely and barbarically being ‘mixed’ out of existance) as ‘reparations’, or, you’re a bigot.
     
    It is indeed a false dichotomy, and a narrative that needs to be dissected. Once you break up the narrative, you can easily demonstrate the parts that are unjust. It's not really my place to talk about this, but I don't support reparations at all. First and foremost, because every white child on the planet is born innocent and to put it on that child (or to take from that child's parents) would be unjust and even cruel. And I totally agree with your argument for the right to simply exist.

    In my post above, I wasn't arguing for "reparations" or anything of that sort, but simply discussing a conversation between two overeducated Anglos that I overheard. They were actually talking about the economy initially and how life is becoming more costly for certain groups and that foreigners are coming in and buying up housing, due to which some more vulnerable groups of locals get displaced. One of them said "this is nothing new, this happened before when the waves of settlers displaced the Natives" (seemed like a pretty shocking comparison to me at first), and then the liberal boomer touched upon the population part by saying things like "there have been huge migrations in the past in human history, this is just another big cycle, big population movement," etc. As in, there is nothing at all special about this one. I just froze because of how final that statement sounded. Really, lady? What about the kids?

    For example, could the Mongolian descendants of Ghengis Khan, or the descendants of the original conquerers of the Islamic Caliphate, ever pay back for their forebear’s murders and enslavement of others?
     
    I'm sure you know what the reaction of the heirs of the Ottoman Empire would be if they were approached like that (either an uncontrolled bout of anger or just laughter, lol, mixed with indifference towards the helpless whites). And I'm sure you know that if it wasn't for the progressive whites then this wouldn't be an issue. And what is even more crazy, is that the progressive whites are not doing this for some kind of a "social justice" reason, but mostly for class reasons - to signal class superiority. And they couldn't even handle the results of what this ideology would wreak in the future. Nor will they themselves have to deal with the consequences of it (well, maybe at some point when they're 89 or so).

    However, if reparations in regard to the Anglosphere were to be paid, I’d be tempted to start with the confiscation of the great estates of the descendants of the progressives and their hangers on who ran the North American chattel slave trade from New England, to not only be paid to others, but to a great many of their own Anglo-Saxon people who had to suffer under it.
     
    That's what I said above, make it personal, instead of imposing collective guilt. A white boy who is born now had nothing to do with any of it.

    But trust me, the moment it comes to real reparations (hopefully, it doesn't), who are they going to take from? Who will allow their wealth to be touched? The ones to be fleeced under this scenario would most likely be the ones in the middle and maybe upper middle class professionals. They'll have to consider bailing at that point.

    Those reparations on their part would be in conjunction with a true abolition of the still on going slavery, wage slavery
     
    Hahaha, I don't know about that. What could replace "wage slavery"? There is a difference between "wage slavery" per se, and the "open borders, immigration / cheap (or not so cheap anymore) labor" set up.


    Lastly, after reasonably doing what one can to stop error and (if appropriate or possible) make amends, forgive yourself, even if others won’t.
     
    Right, create a narrative that goes something like "I recognize the past mistakes, I'm ready to move on, I no longer want to have anything to do with it, regardless of what others might think, this is my position from now on". Even if you weren't guilty of anything to begin with, this might make some of the "reparations seekers" lay off.

    Replies: @S, @S

    “there have been huge migrations in the past in human history, this is just another big cycle, big population movement,” etc. As in, there is nothing at all special about this one. I just froze because of how final that statement sounded. Really, lady? What about the kids?

    I should have added to brainwashed, that they are delusional as well.

    [MORE]

    If you ever have the time, check out the wiki entry for Robert J Lifton’s 1961 book Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism and, in particular, the section of the entry on the ‘Eight Criteria for Thought Reform’. It is very revealing as to what has been to people’s minds via the corporate mass media. Multi-Culturalism and it’s adherants have all the ear marks of being a gigantic cult.

    And what is even more crazy, is that the progressive whites are not doing this for some kind of a “social justice” reason, but mostly for class reasons – to signal class superiority. And they couldn’t even handle the results of what this ideology would wreak in the future. Nor will they themselves have to deal with the consequences of it (well, maybe at some point when they’re 89 or so).

    They have their virtue signaling. They also, as you allude, are due to their personal wealth in many instances somewhat insulated (for now) from the results of what they advocate.

    But trust me, the moment it comes to real reparations (hopefully, it doesn’t), who are they going to take from? Who will allow their wealth to be touched? The ones to be fleeced under this scenario would most likely be the ones in the middle and maybe upper middle class professionals.

    I agree. The main thing is to stop the error, ie colonization, slavery, etc. I mentioned Ghengis Khan and the Caliphate to show others had done wrong as well, and the practical impossibility of ever paying back. However, if a person feels bad about certain things, sure, do something to make amends, but within the context of you and yours living, not destroying one’s self. [I say that as someone who doesn’t like a great many things that were done in the past. I think empires are a bad business.]

    Those reparations on their part would be in conjunction with a true abolition of the still on going slavery, wage slavery

    Hahaha, I don’t know about that. What could replace “wage slavery”? There is a difference between “wage slavery” per se, and the “open borders, immigration / cheap (or not so cheap anymore) labor” set up.

    When I use the term ‘wage slavery’ I am not speaking about legitimate generic wage labor where someone might on occasion be paid a bit low, but specifically in regards to the phenomena of someone not wanting to pay (more often than not) their own people the prevailing real time local rates for the labor, and instead importing (typically by diktat) alien labor, aka ‘immigrants’, also known by the euphamism as ‘cheap labor’, to do the work for much less.

    These are people who have often been first reduced to an unnaturally low state of being, as who else would ever agree to work significantly below the local rates. [I submit, the flooding of China with opium in the the 19th century may have had the ulterior motive of ‘opening up’ China and it’s hundreds of millions of people to enmasse predation as wage slaves, ie so called ‘cheap labor’.]

    I see the term ‘cheap labor’ as a term of propaganda concocted by people who had historically been involved in chattel slavery and it’s trade to sell people on this (for them) much more profitable poison. The term ‘cheap labor’, which has been around since the first half of the 19th century, as intended sounds quite innocuous.

    The term wage slavery much more accurately conveys what is going on, the systematic theft of significant value of the individual’s labor being much more profitably and efficiently taken directly from their pay, ie their ‘wages’, and hence the term wage slavery, as opposed to via their being physically owned as cumbersome and costly to maintain property, ie ‘chattel’, and hence the term chattel slavery.

    I stand by the idea that chattel slavery and it’s trade was monetized in the 19th century with the introduction of wage slavery (ie so called ‘cheap labor’) rather than having been abolished. My post archives flesh this out much more thoroughly than I do here.

    Right, create a narrative that goes something like “I recognize the past mistakes, I’m ready to move on, I no longer want to have anything to do with it, regardless of what others might think, this is my position from now on”.

    There’s a powerful moral case to preserve peoplehood, or, at least have the right to, it’s just been so poorly presented (generally) that few would know it.

    • Agree: Sher Singh
    • Replies: @LatW
    @S


    I should have added to brainwashed, that they are delusional as well.
     
    Of course, it's delusional, but I also sense that these kinds of statements are partly defensive - they know deep in their heart that it is messed up and wrong, and they know that there isn't anything they could or would do, so they just let it slide. And to make it sound somehow acceptable, they come up with this pseudo-argument that it's a "historic process", that it's some kind of a natural movement of people or some other platitude. Whereas the European settlers came barely 400 years ago which is a very short period, historically speaking, to start significantly replacing a population.

    ‘Eight Criteria for Thought Reform’. It is very revealing as to what has been to people’s minds via the corporate mass media. Multi-Culturalism and it’s adherants have all the ear marks of being a gigantic cult.
     
    Check this out:

    "Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism popularized the term "thought-terminating cliché". This refers to a cliché that is a commonly used phrase, or folk wisdom, sometimes used to quell cognitive dissonance. Though the clichéd phrase in and of itself may be valid in certain contexts, its application as a means of dismissing dissent or justifying fallacious logic is what makes it thought-terminating.

    Examples include “Everything happens for a reason”, “Why? Because I said so” (Bare assertion fallacy), “I’m the parent, that’s why” (Appeal to authority), “To each his own”, “It's a matter of opinion!”, “You only live once” (YOLO), and “We will have to agree to disagree”."
     
    So saying something like "there have always been migrations", "this is just another historic cycle" is a "thought-terminating cliché".

    However, if a person feels bad about certain things, sure, do something to make amends, but within the context of you and yours living, not destroying one’s self.
     
    That's actually a very tolerant approach. But it may be that "atonement" is really not the goal here, but control. Let's assume that the reparations are somehow paid in the future. But does that mean that all the shaming about the "oppressive past" will end? Maybe it will only increase?

    One Hundred Years Progress of the United States. [..] Due to completely open borders for wage slavery (ie ‘cheap labor’) purposes, the United States is to have over 400 million people.
     
    400M is not very far from what the population has currently grown into (although it's plateauing). One might think about what this might do to the natural landscape, even the urban landscape. Remember that there are also 22M tourists visiting the US every year. Of course, people should have access to the beauty of America, but the visitation is getting heavier and there is growing pressure on national preserves.

    My post archives flesh this out much more thoroughly than I do here.
     
    I'll have to look into that, since it relates to freedom (in the context of capitalism).

    There’s a powerful moral case to preserve peoplehood, or, at least have the right to, it’s just been so poorly presented (generally) that few would know it.
     
    Well, they've connected the idea of progress with the destruction (or at least irrelevance of peoplehood / nation / nationality), they don't view it anymore as a source of wellbeing or common good. Even though it is.

    Replies: @S, @silviosilver

  422. Bashibuzuk says:
    @AP
    @Coconuts

    Yes, if GDP per capita in both Poland and the UK maintain the same pace in the next 15 years as they have in the past 15 years they will converge.

    I was very impressed by how nice rural Poland was when I visited in April. It wasn’t only physically beautiful but also prosperous. Those villages certainly had nicer, larger, and better maintained houses than I’ve seen in rural Maine or Appalachia! I suspect rural England is also worse.

    I am told this is because a lot of the rural Polish owners had spent years working in the West and sent the money back, to build their dream homes. Eastern Poland where I was had the highest rate of such pioneers, choosing to live and work in the West which is worse in most ways but better in one way (high income) for awhile.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

    Poland is the largest beneficiary of EU funding. Between 2007 and 2013 our country received over 67 billion EUR from the EU’s budget. [….] Between 2014 and 2020 our country will jointly receive EUR 105.8 billion from the EU’s budget – EUR 72.9 billion for the cohesion policy and EUR 28.5 billion for agricultural policy. It means almost 4 billion euro more than Poland received from the previous EU budget.

    https://www.paih.gov.pl/why_poland/eu_funds#:~:text=Poland%20is%20the%20largest%20beneficiary,and%20the%20country’s%20Eastern%20regions.

    Today, the European Commission has approved Poland’s and EU’s largest cohesion policy programme: ‘European Funds for Infrastructure, Climate and Environment 2021-2027’. EU funding under this programme will amount to more than EUR 24.1 billion (EUR 12.9 billion from the European Regional Development Fund and EUR 11.2 billion from the Cohesion Fund).

    https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/newsroom/news/2022/10/10-06-2022-eur-24-billion-worth-of-non-repayable-grants-from-the-eu-poland-s-largest-cohesion-policy-programme-approved-by-the-european-commission

    Two South Korean companies have signed a $5.76 billion contract with Poland to export tanks and howitzers, Seoul’s arms procurement agency said on Saturday, after Warsaw agreed to ramp up arms imports amid tensions with Russia.

    https://www.reuters.com/world/south-korea-poland-sign-58-billion-tank-howitzer-contract-2022-08-27/

    Poland has completed its negotiations with South Korea to buy close to 300 K239 Chunmoo multiple-rocket launchers, with a contract expected to be signed during next week’s visit by Polish Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister Mariusz Błaszczak to Seoul.

    https://www.defensenews.com/global/europe/2022/10/14/poland-to-buy-hundreds-of-s-korean-chunmoo-multiple-rocket-launchers/

    [MORE]

    • Replies: @LatW
    @Bashibuzuk

    It's called "burden sharing". 😊

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

  423. @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Barbarossa

    How many Punjabis have you known in real life?

    I put them above Gypsies but below Albanians myself. On the other hand my sample size is not large and my plan is it ain't ever going to get any bigger.

    Replies: @sher singh, @Barbarossa

    I really haven’t known any Punjabis in real life, so I’ll have to withhold real judgement on that.

    I will say that in casual interactions I have had a much better impression of Sikhs than either Hindu Indians or most Muslims. That could be the luck of the draw, but does color my judgement somewhat.

    As I said to Thulean Friend, I don’t know squat about Sher Singh when push comes to shove, but I do think his trolling is not without merit.

  424. @Yahya
    @Thulean Friend


    Authenticity is important and whatever flaws Silvio may or may not have, he is at least internally consistent in his politics. Whites in the Anglosphere have melded into one. In Europe, Eastern Europeans are still separate from Germanics and Nords to a greater extent than they are in Canada, Australia, USA etc. So Silvio’s politics is in fact rooted in his place, as he shares a common identity with other whites.
     
    Yes but you are forgetting that silviosilver is, by his own admission, a non-white Balkanoid who looks more like a Turk or Arab rather than a Slavic-looking "Eastern European" in a traditional sense. So his identification with whites is more of a "house nigger" type situation than a "common identity" based on racial similarities. Anglos, Germanics and Nords aren't really his people, as I think he'll readily admit, so his constant shilling for whites (and occasional denigration of people racially closer to him) is nothing to be admired, and is quite pathetic actually if you think about it.

    Replies: @Yevardian, @silviosilver

    Yes but you are forgetting that silviosilver is, by his own admission, a non-white Balkanoid who looks more like a Turk or Arab rather than a Slavic-looking “Eastern European” in a traditional sense. So his identification with whites is more of a “house nigger” type situation than a “common identity” based on racial similarities.

    Dunno if he said that directly, but as you well know and even covertly boasted about regarding your family, it’s hard to talk about any ‘typical’ looking Turk, Arab, Armenian or indeed most MENA people. Even within tiny subgroups you find massive variation. Compare the Palestinian Christians George Habash and Richard Hanania, in Europe you could not believe those people came from the same ethnicity.

    Anyway, I disagree. It’s healthy and normal to identity with the politics and worldview of the country in which you were born above an ancestral culture of which he likely has never lived or even speaks the language. And yes, within Anglo countries all ‘whites’ merge identity within a generation or two, Asians are harder but they do try, Indians, Muslims and Jews could but usually don’t want to. Its just blacks that are both totally incapable and unwilling to assimilate, shown from repeated experiences around the world. Perhaps they subconsciously sense that in aggregate they can’t compete.
    Incidentally, this just reinforces my view that pajeet immigration is probably the single biggest longterm threat to Western Civilisation.
    On that, I noticed the new ‘British’ PM, a has-been country whose politics I normally pay zero interest, but the recent clown-show grabbed my attention. My first superficial impressions were he came across as very competent, measured and professional (in striking contrast to his predecessors), and that he and his colleagues look and behave nothing like the Indians in Australia, which seem to be more representative of the general pajeet population. Even after Truss, its a new low to have a ‘British’ Hindu PM married to the daughter of a foreign billionaire. Even Disraeli’s parents nominally converted.

    • Replies: @Sher Singh
    @Yevardian


    Anyway, I disagree. It’s healthy and normal to identity with the politics and worldview of the country in which you were born above an ancestral culture of which he likely has never lived or even speaks the language.
     
    It's unpatriotic to assimilate into an anti-White SJWism that demonizes the majority.
    Cuckservatives never imagine that they're not & haven't been dominant in 3 centuries.

    It's far healthier to learn your ancestral tongue, and enrich your new society.
    For example, to promote Swastikas, Cow Protection, Weapons & Weights among Euros.

    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ
    , @silviosilver
    @Yevardian


    Dunno if he said that directly,
     
    I have previously said there's "nothing" slavic looking about me, and if someone posted a pic of me and polled people "does this guy look more German or more Turk?" it would be a shock if anything less than 100% of responses opted for the latter. Of course, real life is more complex than that, and people can still regard you as "European" looking even if you don't look German. Obviously, I am going to defer to my own eyeballs and my own life experiences to form conclusions about what other people regard me as rather than Yahya's opinions on the matter.

    The race-is-a-social-construct folks aren't completely delusional. I don't know what's happened to this country's (Australia) racial perceptions, but they sure have changed from when I was a kid. In the 1975 Aus movie "The Last of the Knucklemen", there's a scene in which this (assimilated, unaccented) Italian character in the cafeteria of a mining town up north somewhere complains about the Hungarian chef being a wog. And this Anglo character says to him, "so what does that make you?" The Italian gets upset and replies "a bloody Australian, that's what!" The Anglo turns to the guy sitting next to him and says "you ever see an Australian that skin color?" (To which the reply was "he looks alright to me") The Italian wasn't even really all that woggy imo, but people can google it if interested and make their own minds up. Nowadays, only hardcore internet WNs would make an issue of that dude's "whiteness," I think.

    Another personal anecdote (apologies to anyone sick of these), I was at this club/bar earlier this year and I got talking to this younger anglo dude, I think he was in his mid-20s. Now, I am in my 40s (don't wanna be more specific, too paranoid lol), but in a club setting I will saying something much lower, not because I want to deceive anyone, but otherwise I have to go through the "nah no way, are ya really, fuck you don't look it!" routine every time (which I won't lie, is gratifying to hear, but tedious too). On this occasion I told the truth and we got onto a differences-between-now-and-then topic, and one of the differences I mentioned was how much more ethnically divided that place (that specific club) was when I was younger. Then this guy goes to me "oh, are you wog are ya?" I was a bit lost for words because I thought it was just plainly obvious, as in how the fuck does it even require explanation? Now that was just one guy, so maybe not everyone is so racially retarded as not to understand such a basic racial distinction, but equally, it may well be indicative of a trend, since this is hardly the first time I've been "racially included" in a collective "we" by anglos in recent years. [A note to non-Australians, 'wog' can be used quite casually to refer to 'med' types, by both outsiders and by ourselves, usually Europeans, but Turks and some arabs may be comfortable with it too; the days when it was used offensively - as in the movie above - appear to be long gone.]

    Anyway, I'm pretty sure you're aware of all this, and I wrote it more as an indirect reply to Yahya, whose bullshit tires me, but I think I will respond to him directly too, a post in which silviosilver finally reveals the real reason he hates arabs so much, lol.
  425. @Bashibuzuk
    @Barbarossa

    https://bylinetimes.com/2022/05/25/controversial-firm-linked-to-rishi-sunak-among-those-allowed-to-set-global-anti-corruption-agenda-by-world-economic-forum/

    https://kreately.in/would-be-british-pm-rishi-sunaks-family-runs-a-china-linked-world-economic-forum-partner-company-pushing-digital-id-and-social-credit-scores/

    https://www.theguardian.com/business/2021/apr/19/rishi-sunak-bank-of-england-digital-currency-uk-brexit-eu

    Voilà !

    🙂

    Replies: @Barbarossa

    Thanks. Yeah, I thought he just looked like the type. Like if Mitt Romney happened to be a friggin’ Hindu!

    The smarmy seems strong in that one.

  426. Sher Singh says:
    @Yevardian
    @Yahya


    Yes but you are forgetting that silviosilver is, by his own admission, a non-white Balkanoid who looks more like a Turk or Arab rather than a Slavic-looking “Eastern European” in a traditional sense. So his identification with whites is more of a “house nigger” type situation than a “common identity” based on racial similarities.
     
    Dunno if he said that directly, but as you well know and even covertly boasted about regarding your family, it's hard to talk about any 'typical' looking Turk, Arab, Armenian or indeed most MENA people. Even within tiny subgroups you find massive variation. Compare the Palestinian Christians George Habash and Richard Hanania, in Europe you could not believe those people came from the same ethnicity.

    Anyway, I disagree. It's healthy and normal to identity with the politics and worldview of the country in which you were born above an ancestral culture of which he likely has never lived or even speaks the language. And yes, within Anglo countries all 'whites' merge identity within a generation or two, Asians are harder but they do try, Indians, Muslims and Jews could but usually don't want to. Its just blacks that are both totally incapable and unwilling to assimilate, shown from repeated experiences around the world. Perhaps they subconsciously sense that in aggregate they can't compete.
    Incidentally, this just reinforces my view that pajeet immigration is probably the single biggest longterm threat to Western Civilisation.
    On that, I noticed the new 'British' PM, a has-been country whose politics I normally pay zero interest, but the recent clown-show grabbed my attention. My first superficial impressions were he came across as very competent, measured and professional (in striking contrast to his predecessors), and that he and his colleagues look and behave nothing like the Indians in Australia, which seem to be more representative of the general pajeet population. Even after Truss, its a new low to have a 'British' Hindu PM married to the daughter of a foreign billionaire. Even Disraeli's parents nominally converted.

    Replies: @Sher Singh, @silviosilver

    Anyway, I disagree. It’s healthy and normal to identity with the politics and worldview of the country in which you were born above an ancestral culture of which he likely has never lived or even speaks the language.

    It’s unpatriotic to assimilate into an anti-White SJWism that demonizes the majority.
    Cuckservatives never imagine that they’re not & haven’t been dominant in 3 centuries.

    It’s far healthier to learn your ancestral tongue, and enrich your new society.
    For example, to promote Swastikas, Cow Protection, Weapons & Weights among Euros.

    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ

  427. @Mikel
    @Barbarossa


    Sikhs, Muslims, Amish etc. have actual beliefs that they take seriously enough to die for. Absent that level of commitment it’s all just empty materialism.
     
    I seriously disagree with this point.

    Humanity doesn't need more people willing to die and kill for political or religious issues, it needs to move past that ancestral tradition. I used to think that we were slowly moving in that direction after the end of the Cold War, the expansion of the EU to countries that used to be enemies for centuries and the globalized trade of the past decades but sadly, it was just a period of calm before the storm, as we're now witnessing.

    It may be beyond the capabilities of the human species, absent some future genetic reprogramming, but the problem with continuing to war among ourselves for "beliefs" is that technological progress made us enter a completely new era 77 years ago where the possibility of destroying civilized life on the planet in one of those wars became real. For 40 years we toyed with Armaggedon in a clash between the beliefs in capitalism/democracy versus communism and now we have entered a new era where we are again toying with the same catastrophe for even more trivial beliefs, hardly more consequential than a pissing contest.

    We are probably not capable of destroying our own species in a war yet but, as time progresses, I see no reason why we won't reach that capability so learning to avoid wars between nations, tribes and religious or political groups is more than just preventing the senseless massacres that we have experienced throughout history, it's a necessary condition for the ultimate preservation of our species.

    From this perspective, materialism may not be a very worthy ideal per se but if it leads people in the advanced countries to reject the idea of dying and killing for "beliefs", it may be a positive development.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Sher Singh, @Barbarossa, @silviosilver, @Coconuts

    I understand your point completely. However, it seems that absent questions of religious or cultural conflicts people will continue to find things to kill each other over. The 20th century was extremely bloody and we’ll see about the 21st. I’m pretty convinced that materialistic ideas about the perfectibility of man are complete bunk.

    I’m not at all convinced that the inter-tribal style warfare of the pre-nation state era was any less violent on balance than the modern world. Now we just have a greater population which is more completely insulated from the consequences of war. Materialism doesn’t really seem to mean that wars are less likely to happen it just concentrates the reasons into more strictly economic and “utilitarian” reasons.

  428. @Dmitry
    @LatW

    It's not about responsibility. Most people from warzone, is usually not responsible for it, in Ukraine, in the Middle East, in East Africa. Some part of people are compassionate to the victims of warzone, another part of people transfer blame for the warzone to its victims.

    For enough years, AP has been my "internet friend", so I know his views about this topic, have been the latter category, where history's victims, are responsible for the crimes against them. He wrote it directly.
    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/sixth-proof/#comment-3206911

    Nowadays Ukraine is a warzone, more dangerous than some of the most famous warzones in the Middle East. It's producing the most refugees in Europe. It's not an antonym to Syria, but Syrian and Ukrainian refugees are in a similar situation.

    AP argues that Eastern Europe is more European than Western Europe, because Western Europe received a lot of foreigners, including non-European refugees like Syrians, that Western Europe should fund Eastern Europe instead of Syrians etc. But from the Western European perspective, the response for Ukrainians is not too different than Syrians.

    I'm an immigrant from the same world. I'm not feeling more deserving the welcome by Western Europeans than any other foreigners. It's not like I can say I'm from a more normal region or culture than any Latin American immigrant going across the Mexico-USA border to live in America. And my difference is that I'm a legal immigrant from a graduate program, with some superficially more elite status, but someone could change the paperwork one day and I could be like any Syrian.

    -

    By the way, what's your theory about Sobchak. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l4o4FakHZkE.

    It's interesting she had given her an Israeli passport immediately (like Abramovich), when for normal people Israel only gives a passport if you live in Israel for a year. It's a bit disillusioning to find people perceived as elite from Russia, are given a different rapid procedure there than the ordinary cattle, even though it is a state democracy with supposed equal laws.

    Replies: @LatW

    Most people from warzone, is usually not responsible for it, in Ukraine, in the Middle East, in East Africa. Some part of people are compassionate to the victims of warzone, another part of people transfer blame for the warzone to its victims.

    Look, I was just trying to say that Eastern Slavic people have historically been subjected to exorbitant amounts of violence, that doesn’t mean they are somehow more violent as people. There are many Ukrainians of various backgrounds, who have never been in the military, who have been pushed into this, doctors, software engineers, all kinds of professions.

    [MORE]

    For enough years, AP has been my “internet friend”, so I know his views about this topic, have been the latter category, where history’s victims, are responsible for the crimes against them. He wrote it directly.

    I know, I didn’t mean to interfere. I simply said that the most advanced arsenal on the planet (both Soviet & Western made, as well as Ukrainian made) is at work right now, which is extremely unfortunate, so the casualties are higher. I think some in the West do see this, thus they are sympathetic. And, yes, there are parallels with Syria, ofc.

    But from the Western European perspective, the response for Ukrainians is not too different than Syrians.

    It’s hard to say, maybe you’re right, but it looks like in some cases Ukrainians are favored because this seems very unjust and because they are EEs who at least seem to support democracy. This may sound trite, but there is something to it. I also suspect that some liberals in the West support them because it’s safe to support a smaller white population that is attacked by somebody much larger and authoritarian.

    Sobchak

    Ivan Yakovina is a good analyst whom I enjoy following, so I trust his insight, although I wasn’t aware that she was going to be sanctioned. The system has swallowed and ground up most of the real opposition and the screws are only being tightened now. But it’s strange that they would attack her (apparently they raided her apartment, what for?), she’s never struck me as all too “dangerous”. Could it be that she just wanted to leave and asked her dad to get her an Israeli passport and to stage this exit? Or her family has some connections to groups that the administration doesn’t trust? No idea. Afaik, they just changed her status to witness so she could come back? Tbh, she hasn’t been the focus of my attention lately.

    Btw, did you see this, don’t know if this is true:

    https://verstka.media/sotrudniki-vedomstv-begut-ot-mobilizacii/

    • Replies: @Dmitry
    @LatW


    maybe you’re right, but it looks like in some cases Ukrainians are favored
     
    With the refugees topic, I think it is mostly just people in Western Europe who are compassionate, who are good Samaritans, who want to be helpful. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-KCefMou_4w. They are helping refugees not for a special political agenda ("Refugees welcome"), but they want to help refugees for moral reasons. Perhaps also virtue-signaling, which I think internet and social media is increasing incentives for virtue-signaling.

    But as oldtimer in this forum, I know AP's views about the refugee topic. He believes helping refugees is an indication of weakness and Western decay, says even now Western Europeans are a "decaying society" because they build the housing for Syrians.

    Ukrainians are dependent for the same kindness of Westerners not differently than Syrians, but he continues writing about the same Western Europeans who are helping Ukrainians who he believes are "decaying Westerners" because of their moral principles that caused them to help refugees including Ukrainians.

    It reminds of JackD in the Sailer forum who is complaining about racism against Jews, in the same thread writing equal racism about other nationalities, without noticing the contradictions. I just find mysterious how people could have a lack of ethical principles when it doesn't apply to the narrow group which they identified to their ego. It's like they are missing the part of the brain which allows you to have ethics or morality.

    , I didn’t mean to interfere.
     
    Well you reminded me of the old thread and posts. https://www.unz.com/akarlin/sixth-proof/#comment-3206911 AP believes people who are victims of history, are "punished by God". So, his Hindu religious views, imply that Ukrainians are being punished by Gods, or Gods. It sounds like Gods, as it is contradiction of a Christian view, the opposite of the New Testament.

    These views are one reason this forum was entertaining . I wouldn't want to criticize it too much, as it wouldn't be entertaining without this. Still, because sometimes it is not clear if people are actually serious, perhaps it needs to be said - victims of crimes are not responsible for the crimes against them

    In real world, most Ukrainians are not directly responsible for this disaster, neither most Russians. This is the same for most of the political disasters in the world. You're living on a volcano, and you might know this, but the only thing you might be responsible for, is to not escape from the danger zone.

    Protection of refugees is ethically important, but also pretty complicated topic. For one example, refugees are often from failed countries and carry an organizational culture of their failed country to the developed world. For another example, it's not always easy to know difference between refugees and economic immigrants. Also there is bad faith when people who support open borders immigration can be often using rhetoric about refugees, when they want to open borders for economic immigrants.

    Still, either you believe there should be protection of refugees or not. You can't say "protect refugees when they are from my nationality I have connected my ego to", but at the same time say it is a sign of Western decay when those refugees "are not my nationality". The purpose of helping refugees was not self-interest for your chosen group.

    Could it be that she just wanted to leave and asked her dad to get her an Israeli passport
     
    I don't think her Israeli passport can be so old as the 1990s when father was still living. Although she has connection to the Israeli government for some years, as she working as a promoter for their Minister of Tourism.

    she’s never struck me as all too “dangerous”.
     
    Sure, she is part of the game and has been enjoying the position of loyal pseudo-opposition.

    Replies: @silviosilver, @AP

  429. @Mikel
    @Barbarossa


    Sikhs, Muslims, Amish etc. have actual beliefs that they take seriously enough to die for. Absent that level of commitment it’s all just empty materialism.
     
    I seriously disagree with this point.

    Humanity doesn't need more people willing to die and kill for political or religious issues, it needs to move past that ancestral tradition. I used to think that we were slowly moving in that direction after the end of the Cold War, the expansion of the EU to countries that used to be enemies for centuries and the globalized trade of the past decades but sadly, it was just a period of calm before the storm, as we're now witnessing.

    It may be beyond the capabilities of the human species, absent some future genetic reprogramming, but the problem with continuing to war among ourselves for "beliefs" is that technological progress made us enter a completely new era 77 years ago where the possibility of destroying civilized life on the planet in one of those wars became real. For 40 years we toyed with Armaggedon in a clash between the beliefs in capitalism/democracy versus communism and now we have entered a new era where we are again toying with the same catastrophe for even more trivial beliefs, hardly more consequential than a pissing contest.

    We are probably not capable of destroying our own species in a war yet but, as time progresses, I see no reason why we won't reach that capability so learning to avoid wars between nations, tribes and religious or political groups is more than just preventing the senseless massacres that we have experienced throughout history, it's a necessary condition for the ultimate preservation of our species.

    From this perspective, materialism may not be a very worthy ideal per se but if it leads people in the advanced countries to reject the idea of dying and killing for "beliefs", it may be a positive development.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Sher Singh, @Barbarossa, @silviosilver, @Coconuts

    it’s a necessary condition for the ultimate preservation of our species.

    I agree with everything in this post (which is why I hit the Agree button) except this statement, and it’s more that I think it requires refinement than a case of outright disagreement.

    If ‘my race,’ however narrowly or broadly you want to define it, isn’t going to figure in the future – as all trends suggest it will not – then I just can’t get that excited about the preservation of the species.

    A thought experiment: If you died and came back in a thousand or ten thousand or a hundred thousand years and you found that everyone on the planet was what you today would recognize as racially African, you may insist that the species has been preserved, but would you really find that a relief? A joy? Really?

    Personally, I’d be devastated. Now, if those future Africans defied the naysayers and actually managed to “build Wakanda,” I might feel a little less devastated, in fact, I’d probably be interested to learn something about their achievements and the workings of that society, but I’d hardly be elated. Compare whatever your own feelings are about that to what your feelings might be if that future included your own kind in it. It’s a telling difference, isn’t it?

    Of course, all-African or not are not the only two possibilities. I would feel considerably less devastated if the future were all-Asian, but that would still leave me a long way off elation. In any future in which “my race” as it exists today doesn’t figure, it’s only when you get to something like an araby or latinxy kinda mix that my feelings would switch from negative to positive – you know, not exactly my own kind, but then again not really all that far off either, and if they’ve also got some decent achievements to go along with their mere existence, then I imagine I would feel quite good about it. (And like any ‘racist’ worth his salt, I would of course comfort myself by insisting it was my race’s contribution to the mix that made all the good things possible hehe.)

    • Replies: @Mikel
    @silviosilver


    If you died and came back in a thousand or ten thousand or a hundred thousand years and you found that everyone on the planet was what you today would recognize as racially African, you may insist that the species has been preserved, but would you really find that a relief? A joy? Really?
     
    Well, I don't know, it depends. It's a far-fetched hypothetical. Two thoughts that come to mind is that it's a much better alternative than a world where cockroaches and rats are the dominant species and that I can definitely feel much more compassion and afinity towards Africans than towards any non-human species.

    In fact, I instinctively feel more strongly about Europeans than about other human groups but I don't think that race is the most important driver of my feelings towards other humans. Living in Latin America made me become very HBD aware but I remember how sometimes I just felt compelled to give some money to poor elderly women begging on the street. Maybe my Catholic upbringing, I don't know.

    In any case, managing to preserve our species is no guarantee that it won't evolve into something ugly and unrecognizable but we don't know so why persist in the path to its destruction? To assert the superiority of my tribe's beliefs?

    Replies: @silviosilver

  430. @Bashibuzuk
    @AP


    Poland is the largest beneficiary of EU funding. Between 2007 and 2013 our country received over 67 billion EUR from the EU’s budget. [....] Between 2014 and 2020 our country will jointly receive EUR 105.8 billion from the EU’s budget - EUR 72.9 billion for the cohesion policy and EUR 28.5 billion for agricultural policy. It means almost 4 billion euro more than Poland received from the previous EU budget.
     
    https://www.paih.gov.pl/why_poland/eu_funds#:~:text=Poland%20is%20the%20largest%20beneficiary,and%20the%20country's%20Eastern%20regions.

    Today, the European Commission has approved Poland’s and EU’s largest cohesion policy programme: ‘European Funds for Infrastructure, Climate and Environment 2021-2027’. EU funding under this programme will amount to more than EUR 24.1 billion (EUR 12.9 billion from the European Regional Development Fund and EUR 11.2 billion from the Cohesion Fund).
     
    https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/newsroom/news/2022/10/10-06-2022-eur-24-billion-worth-of-non-repayable-grants-from-the-eu-poland-s-largest-cohesion-policy-programme-approved-by-the-european-commission

    Two South Korean companies have signed a $5.76 billion contract with Poland to export tanks and howitzers, Seoul's arms procurement agency said on Saturday, after Warsaw agreed to ramp up arms imports amid tensions with Russia.
     
    https://www.reuters.com/world/south-korea-poland-sign-58-billion-tank-howitzer-contract-2022-08-27/

    Poland has completed its negotiations with South Korea to buy close to 300 K239 Chunmoo multiple-rocket launchers, with a contract expected to be signed during next week’s visit by Polish Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister Mariusz Błaszczak to Seoul.
     
    https://www.defensenews.com/global/europe/2022/10/14/poland-to-buy-hundreds-of-s-korean-chunmoo-multiple-rocket-launchers/



    https://img.nzz.ch/2022/08/17/3e7ac764-bcd7-4fc8-8047-0a499e812fc1.jpeg

    https://www.allkpop.com/upload/2022/03/content/091507/1646856475-untitled-1.jpg

    Replies: @LatW

    It’s called “burden sharing”. 😊

    • Replies: @Bashibuzuk
    @LatW

    https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2022/09/poland-will-have-a-large-and-modern-tank-army.html

    Poland is preparing to fight RusFed in the Baltics and Ukraine. Poland intends to become the focal point for the assembly of the Intermarium.

    The Intermarium is put in place to prevent the economic connectivity between Old Europe (France, Italy, Germany...) and China through the territories currently controlled, or in the case of Belarus, influenced by the RusFed.

    Old Europe is being sacrificed by the Atlanticist branch of the Globalist to prevent the appearance of the Eurasian economic and military superpower in which China and Old Europe would be the major stakeholders, with RusFed, Iran and Turkey being the minor ones.

    Poland is gambling to become an additional major stakeholder in this geopolitical situation that will define the first half of the twenty-first century in Eurasia. It plays the role of the Atlanticist redoubt in Europe (Fort Trump for G-d's sake...)

    Poland is playing its hand as usual, in a somewhat demonstrative manner. They could have ordered their main battle tanks and other military upgrades in Old Europe, but they didn't. By choosing to proceed that way they (over ?) emphasize their independence and what they see as their growing clout in the Eurasian affairs.

    As usual, Poland might end up punching above their weight. It has happened before and we know how it usually ends when it happens. Old Europe will not go gentle into that good night, it might well push Poland towards a direct confrontational with the RusFed in Ukraine, Belarus and the Baltics, and then backstab it when the going gets tough.

    https://www.thenationalnews.com/world/europe/2022/10/13/france-wont-retaliate-with-nuclear-weapons-if-russia-uses-them-in-ukraine/

    That would be some burden sharing all right: Poland and the Baltics would shoulder the burden, fall when backstabbed, and do some sharing with Germany clawing its lost historical territories back.

    Then OBOR would go through RusFed, Belarus and the German Baltic territories (including Königsberg) with the Nord Stream pipelines magically spirited back to life.

    That would allow for the birth of Eurasia from Dublin to Vladivostok with Han Chinese characteristics. China and Old Europe would have won this round of the Great Game 2.0.

    https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3197667/german-chancellor-olaf-scholz-visit-china-next-week

    https://ic.pics.livejournal.com/fon_eichwald/43081844/57393/57393_640.jpg

    Expectations...

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/aa/Poland_can_into_Wikipedia.jpg

    Reality... ?

    🙂

    Replies: @Beckow, @Mr. Hack, @Wokechoke, @AP, @LatW

  431. @Dmitry
    @Mr. Hack

    Tea and coffee are healthy because it requires heating water to level that usually deactivates pathogenic microorganisms which are sometimes in water.

    In the ex-Mormon forum, they talk often about the health damage and parasites they receive in their missions. They are talking about how they received giardia parasites from drinking water in Latin America, in Russia, in Philippines. Some are talking about health effects from dirty water years after they finished their missions in those countries.

    Allowing tea and coffee, could have reduced risk to some extent. But who said the cults' rules, should be rational? More irrational rules can increase cost to be in the cult, increase commitment in the cult, increase conditioning for obedience of the followers. You can also notice not every rule Haredi Jews are following, will seem very rational from the perspective of science and reason.


    coffee prohibitions were promulgated during a time when coffee was seen as only a drink that included caffeine, which in itself is controversial, as caffeine
     
    They allow to drink caffeine including Red Bull or Coca Cola. https://tinyurl.com/39vt2nxy

    But tea and coffee are a taboo. And as a basic of human psychology, therefore tea and coffee are becoming hype for many of them after they exit.

    Replies: @Mikhail

    Does that include boiled water after it’s cooled like in home brewing ice tea?

  432. @silviosilver
    @Mikel


    it’s a necessary condition for the ultimate preservation of our species.
     
    I agree with everything in this post (which is why I hit the Agree button) except this statement, and it's more that I think it requires refinement than a case of outright disagreement.

    If 'my race,' however narrowly or broadly you want to define it, isn't going to figure in the future - as all trends suggest it will not - then I just can't get that excited about the preservation of the species.

    A thought experiment: If you died and came back in a thousand or ten thousand or a hundred thousand years and you found that everyone on the planet was what you today would recognize as racially African, you may insist that the species has been preserved, but would you really find that a relief? A joy? Really?

    Personally, I'd be devastated. Now, if those future Africans defied the naysayers and actually managed to "build Wakanda," I might feel a little less devastated, in fact, I'd probably be interested to learn something about their achievements and the workings of that society, but I'd hardly be elated. Compare whatever your own feelings are about that to what your feelings might be if that future included your own kind in it. It's a telling difference, isn't it?

    Of course, all-African or not are not the only two possibilities. I would feel considerably less devastated if the future were all-Asian, but that would still leave me a long way off elation. In any future in which "my race" as it exists today doesn't figure, it's only when you get to something like an araby or latinxy kinda mix that my feelings would switch from negative to positive - you know, not exactly my own kind, but then again not really all that far off either, and if they've also got some decent achievements to go along with their mere existence, then I imagine I would feel quite good about it. (And like any 'racist' worth his salt, I would of course comfort myself by insisting it was my race's contribution to the mix that made all the good things possible hehe.)

    Replies: @Mikel

    If you died and came back in a thousand or ten thousand or a hundred thousand years and you found that everyone on the planet was what you today would recognize as racially African, you may insist that the species has been preserved, but would you really find that a relief? A joy? Really?

    Well, I don’t know, it depends. It’s a far-fetched hypothetical. Two thoughts that come to mind is that it’s a much better alternative than a world where cockroaches and rats are the dominant species and that I can definitely feel much more compassion and afinity towards Africans than towards any non-human species.

    In fact, I instinctively feel more strongly about Europeans than about other human groups but I don’t think that race is the most important driver of my feelings towards other humans. Living in Latin America made me become very HBD aware but I remember how sometimes I just felt compelled to give some money to poor elderly women begging on the street. Maybe my Catholic upbringing, I don’t know.

    In any case, managing to preserve our species is no guarantee that it won’t evolve into something ugly and unrecognizable but we don’t know so why persist in the path to its destruction? To assert the superiority of my tribe’s beliefs?

    • Replies: @silviosilver
    @Mikel


    Well, I don’t know, it depends. It’s a far-fetched hypothetical. Two thoughts that come to mind is that it’s a much better alternative than a world where cockroaches and rats are the dominant species and that I can definitely feel much more compassion and afinity towards Africans than towards any non-human species.
     
    Fair enough. Feel free to tell me to fuck off if you find the topic distasteful, but I have an even farther-fetched hypothetical for you, the purpose of which isn't to "put you on the spot," but to provoke consideration about what is truly important in life. If you don't want to answer and don't want to tell me to fuck off, that's fine; I'll be happy if you just give it some thought.

    There is a comet hurtling towards the earth and you are faced with the following choice: you can either save your own race but the rest of humanity dies or you can save the rest of humanity but your own race dies. I know it's inconceivable that such a scenario could ever arise, but be a sport and play along eh? Which do you choose? For me the answer is obvious and I would give it unhesitatingly. (I don't mean to sound like I think I'm "better" than someone who would have to think about it; I'm saying it that way to report that I've thought about this sort of thing enough that I have a very good idea of where I stand.)

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Mikel, @Mikel, @Barbarossa

  433. Societal Differences:

    https://www.rt.com/russia/565549-duma-lgbt-propaganda-amendments/

    Excerpt –

    Khinshtein clarified earlier that the proposed bill does not ban LGBT identity as such, however. Speaking at the Valdai Discussion Club on Thursday, Russian President Vladimir Putin said that he was fine with the West promoting values “like dozens of genders and gay pride parades” at home, but not in his country.

    If Western elites believe that they can incorporate into the minds of their people, their societies things that I personally find somewhat weird but which are apparently in fashion,” Putin said, “so be it. Let them do whatever they want.

  434. @LatW
    @S


    They’ve also been presented with a crazy false dichotomy, ie either willfully accept your murder as a people (ie genocide in the truest sense of that much abused term via crudely and barbarically being ‘mixed’ out of existance) as ‘reparations’, or, you’re a bigot.
     
    It is indeed a false dichotomy, and a narrative that needs to be dissected. Once you break up the narrative, you can easily demonstrate the parts that are unjust. It's not really my place to talk about this, but I don't support reparations at all. First and foremost, because every white child on the planet is born innocent and to put it on that child (or to take from that child's parents) would be unjust and even cruel. And I totally agree with your argument for the right to simply exist.

    In my post above, I wasn't arguing for "reparations" or anything of that sort, but simply discussing a conversation between two overeducated Anglos that I overheard. They were actually talking about the economy initially and how life is becoming more costly for certain groups and that foreigners are coming in and buying up housing, due to which some more vulnerable groups of locals get displaced. One of them said "this is nothing new, this happened before when the waves of settlers displaced the Natives" (seemed like a pretty shocking comparison to me at first), and then the liberal boomer touched upon the population part by saying things like "there have been huge migrations in the past in human history, this is just another big cycle, big population movement," etc. As in, there is nothing at all special about this one. I just froze because of how final that statement sounded. Really, lady? What about the kids?

    For example, could the Mongolian descendants of Ghengis Khan, or the descendants of the original conquerers of the Islamic Caliphate, ever pay back for their forebear’s murders and enslavement of others?
     
    I'm sure you know what the reaction of the heirs of the Ottoman Empire would be if they were approached like that (either an uncontrolled bout of anger or just laughter, lol, mixed with indifference towards the helpless whites). And I'm sure you know that if it wasn't for the progressive whites then this wouldn't be an issue. And what is even more crazy, is that the progressive whites are not doing this for some kind of a "social justice" reason, but mostly for class reasons - to signal class superiority. And they couldn't even handle the results of what this ideology would wreak in the future. Nor will they themselves have to deal with the consequences of it (well, maybe at some point when they're 89 or so).

    However, if reparations in regard to the Anglosphere were to be paid, I’d be tempted to start with the confiscation of the great estates of the descendants of the progressives and their hangers on who ran the North American chattel slave trade from New England, to not only be paid to others, but to a great many of their own Anglo-Saxon people who had to suffer under it.
     
    That's what I said above, make it personal, instead of imposing collective guilt. A white boy who is born now had nothing to do with any of it.

    But trust me, the moment it comes to real reparations (hopefully, it doesn't), who are they going to take from? Who will allow their wealth to be touched? The ones to be fleeced under this scenario would most likely be the ones in the middle and maybe upper middle class professionals. They'll have to consider bailing at that point.

    Those reparations on their part would be in conjunction with a true abolition of the still on going slavery, wage slavery
     
    Hahaha, I don't know about that. What could replace "wage slavery"? There is a difference between "wage slavery" per se, and the "open borders, immigration / cheap (or not so cheap anymore) labor" set up.


    Lastly, after reasonably doing what one can to stop error and (if appropriate or possible) make amends, forgive yourself, even if others won’t.
     
    Right, create a narrative that goes something like "I recognize the past mistakes, I'm ready to move on, I no longer want to have anything to do with it, regardless of what others might think, this is my position from now on". Even if you weren't guilty of anything to begin with, this might make some of the "reparations seekers" lay off.

    Replies: @S, @S

    They were actually talking about the economy initially and how life is becoming more costly for certain groups and that foreigners are coming in and buying up housing, due to which some more vulnerable groups of locals get displaced. One of them said “this is nothing new, this happened before when the waves of settlers displaced the Natives” (seemed like a pretty shocking comparison to me at first), and then the liberal boomer touched upon the population part by saying things like “there have been huge migrations in the past in human history, this is just another big cycle, big population movement,” etc.

    That amoral self centered type of mentality has been around awhile.

    [MORE]

    There was a book published in 1871 in the United States entitled One Hundred Years Progress of the United States. Pages 460 – 527 describe the United States one hundred years in the future in 1970. Interestingly, they describe walking through a future city in Utah the last few pages.

    It’s all very ‘Multi-cultural’ as they would say today.

    Due to completely open borders for wage slavery (ie ‘cheap labor’) purposes, the United States is to have over 400 million people. In the future inner city, acts of ultra-violence are a common everyday occurrence on the streets; a knife crime is described by a drug crazed/hatred consumed Malay, one of the many future discarded slaves from all over the world is to occupy the US inner cities.

    Race is readily acknowledged to exist, and due to the deliberately uncontrolled mass immigration the country will be fundamentally changed, both morally and intellectually.

    A bit dry in places but worth a read.

    Below, on pg 511 which I’ve linked to, the writer casually describes importing by diktat tens of millions of wage slaves into the United States from China, then (in 1870) newly opened up due to the Opium Wars, which will ‘take the place of our present laboring classes’.

    The template described here of importing alien labor to avoid paying the prevailing real time local rates to one’s own people is straight from chattel slavery. These historically slavery corrupted elites and hangers on, whom long ago should have been overthrown and removed from power, did not (I submit) reform themselves in regards to slavery.

    Should they succeed in creating their long sought after world state, or ’empire’ as they sometimes call it, it may very well be a slavery based world order.

    It’s what they know and are accustomed to.

    As was recently heard, with a slight addendum…

    ‘You will have nothing, and you will work for nothing, and you will be happy.’

    With the proper conditioning, it could maybe be done.

    ‘The Chinese question, viz., whether the Chinese and other oriental nations shall be allowed to swarm into our territory and take the place of our present laboring classes; and whether, if, as is probable, this right is conceded, they should be admitted to the
    same political and social privileges with ourselves.’

    https://archive.org/details/onehundredyearsp00flinrich/page/510/mode/2up

  435. @Yevardian
    @Yahya


    Yes but you are forgetting that silviosilver is, by his own admission, a non-white Balkanoid who looks more like a Turk or Arab rather than a Slavic-looking “Eastern European” in a traditional sense. So his identification with whites is more of a “house nigger” type situation than a “common identity” based on racial similarities.
     
    Dunno if he said that directly, but as you well know and even covertly boasted about regarding your family, it's hard to talk about any 'typical' looking Turk, Arab, Armenian or indeed most MENA people. Even within tiny subgroups you find massive variation. Compare the Palestinian Christians George Habash and Richard Hanania, in Europe you could not believe those people came from the same ethnicity.

    Anyway, I disagree. It's healthy and normal to identity with the politics and worldview of the country in which you were born above an ancestral culture of which he likely has never lived or even speaks the language. And yes, within Anglo countries all 'whites' merge identity within a generation or two, Asians are harder but they do try, Indians, Muslims and Jews could but usually don't want to. Its just blacks that are both totally incapable and unwilling to assimilate, shown from repeated experiences around the world. Perhaps they subconsciously sense that in aggregate they can't compete.
    Incidentally, this just reinforces my view that pajeet immigration is probably the single biggest longterm threat to Western Civilisation.
    On that, I noticed the new 'British' PM, a has-been country whose politics I normally pay zero interest, but the recent clown-show grabbed my attention. My first superficial impressions were he came across as very competent, measured and professional (in striking contrast to his predecessors), and that he and his colleagues look and behave nothing like the Indians in Australia, which seem to be more representative of the general pajeet population. Even after Truss, its a new low to have a 'British' Hindu PM married to the daughter of a foreign billionaire. Even Disraeli's parents nominally converted.

    Replies: @Sher Singh, @silviosilver

    Dunno if he said that directly,

    I have previously said there’s “nothing” slavic looking about me, and if someone posted a pic of me and polled people “does this guy look more German or more Turk?” it would be a shock if anything less than 100% of responses opted for the latter. Of course, real life is more complex than that, and people can still regard you as “European” looking even if you don’t look German. Obviously, I am going to defer to my own eyeballs and my own life experiences to form conclusions about what other people regard me as rather than Yahya’s opinions on the matter.

    The race-is-a-social-construct folks aren’t completely delusional. I don’t know what’s happened to this country’s (Australia) racial perceptions, but they sure have changed from when I was a kid. In the 1975 Aus movie “The Last of the Knucklemen”, there’s a scene in which this (assimilated, unaccented) Italian character in the cafeteria of a mining town up north somewhere complains about the Hungarian chef being a wog. And this Anglo character says to him, “so what does that make you?” The Italian gets upset and replies “a bloody Australian, that’s what!” The Anglo turns to the guy sitting next to him and says “you ever see an Australian that skin color?” (To which the reply was “he looks alright to me”) The Italian wasn’t even really all that woggy imo, but people can google it if interested and make their own minds up. Nowadays, only hardcore internet WNs would make an issue of that dude’s “whiteness,” I think.

    Another personal anecdote (apologies to anyone sick of these), I was at this club/bar earlier this year and I got talking to this younger anglo dude, I think he was in his mid-20s. Now, I am in my 40s (don’t wanna be more specific, too paranoid lol), but in a club setting I will saying something much lower, not because I want to deceive anyone, but otherwise I have to go through the “nah no way, are ya really, fuck you don’t look it!” routine every time (which I won’t lie, is gratifying to hear, but tedious too). On this occasion I told the truth and we got onto a differences-between-now-and-then topic, and one of the differences I mentioned was how much more ethnically divided that place (that specific club) was when I was younger. Then this guy goes to me “oh, are you wog are ya?” I was a bit lost for words because I thought it was just plainly obvious, as in how the fuck does it even require explanation? Now that was just one guy, so maybe not everyone is so racially retarded as not to understand such a basic racial distinction, but equally, it may well be indicative of a trend, since this is hardly the first time I’ve been “racially included” in a collective “we” by anglos in recent years. [A note to non-Australians, ‘wog’ can be used quite casually to refer to ‘med’ types, by both outsiders and by ourselves, usually Europeans, but Turks and some arabs may be comfortable with it too; the days when it was used offensively – as in the movie above – appear to be long gone.]

    Anyway, I’m pretty sure you’re aware of all this, and I wrote it more as an indirect reply to Yahya, whose bullshit tires me, but I think I will respond to him directly too, a post in which silviosilver finally reveals the real reason he hates arabs so much, lol.

  436. @Mikel
    @silviosilver


    If you died and came back in a thousand or ten thousand or a hundred thousand years and you found that everyone on the planet was what you today would recognize as racially African, you may insist that the species has been preserved, but would you really find that a relief? A joy? Really?
     
    Well, I don't know, it depends. It's a far-fetched hypothetical. Two thoughts that come to mind is that it's a much better alternative than a world where cockroaches and rats are the dominant species and that I can definitely feel much more compassion and afinity towards Africans than towards any non-human species.

    In fact, I instinctively feel more strongly about Europeans than about other human groups but I don't think that race is the most important driver of my feelings towards other humans. Living in Latin America made me become very HBD aware but I remember how sometimes I just felt compelled to give some money to poor elderly women begging on the street. Maybe my Catholic upbringing, I don't know.

    In any case, managing to preserve our species is no guarantee that it won't evolve into something ugly and unrecognizable but we don't know so why persist in the path to its destruction? To assert the superiority of my tribe's beliefs?

    Replies: @silviosilver

    Well, I don’t know, it depends. It’s a far-fetched hypothetical. Two thoughts that come to mind is that it’s a much better alternative than a world where cockroaches and rats are the dominant species and that I can definitely feel much more compassion and afinity towards Africans than towards any non-human species.

    Fair enough. Feel free to tell me to fuck off if you find the topic distasteful, but I have an even farther-fetched hypothetical for you, the purpose of which isn’t to “put you on the spot,” but to provoke consideration about what is truly important in life. If you don’t want to answer and don’t want to tell me to fuck off, that’s fine; I’ll be happy if you just give it some thought.

    There is a comet hurtling towards the earth and you are faced with the following choice: you can either save your own race but the rest of humanity dies or you can save the rest of humanity but your own race dies. I know it’s inconceivable that such a scenario could ever arise, but be a sport and play along eh? Which do you choose? For me the answer is obvious and I would give it unhesitatingly. (I don’t mean to sound like I think I’m “better” than someone who would have to think about it; I’m saying it that way to report that I’ve thought about this sort of thing enough that I have a very good idea of where I stand.)

    • Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
    @silviosilver

    Did you enjoy Mein Kampf?

    : )

    I have often wondered since I first read it why nobody ever makes any mention of the thing in the project new american century pearl harbor writeup about genetic race targeted bio-weapons. I swear you could terrorize jews just talking about them even though such weapons never have and quite probably will never exist. They seem to like terrorizing themselves like that.

    Replies: @silviosilver, @silviosilver

    , @Mikel
    @silviosilver


    There is a comet hurtling towards the earth and you are faced with the following choice: you can either save your own race but the rest of humanity dies or you can save the rest of humanity but your own race dies.
     
    I would choose saving my own race in a heartbeat, of course, although I think I would prefer the choice to be between saving all human females along with myself or saving all human males except for me.

    In fact, I am so selfish that if I learned today that a million people had died in a terrible earthquake in China I would feel sad but I wouldn't have much problem falling asleep at night. On the other hand, if I lost a finger in an accident I would feel more agitated at bedtime.

    But as Adam Smith (the author of this hypothetical) explained, this doesn't really mean that we are incapable of empathy towards distant human beings. It only means that we naturally care more about our immediate things than about the distant ones, which is the rational thing to do in order to function normally in life. He was nevertheless a humanist with very solid moral principles.

    Replies: @silviosilver

    , @Mikel
    @silviosilver

    But on second thoughts, perhaps you are right that preservation of the species is not the main reason one could invoke to try to avoid following the current path of self-destruction. The main reason would probably the more immediate one of saving ourselves and our descendants from a global devastation without precedents.

    , @Barbarossa
    @silviosilver


    you can either save your own race but the rest of humanity dies or you can save the rest of humanity but your own race dies.
     
    The problem with a hypothetical like this is the question of what even constitutes "your own race". I'm primarily Irish and German, but I live in the US as has my family for several generations. I consider myself a Celt in terms of my heritage, but quite frankly I have no real ties to Ireland or anyone there. I also consider the ubiquitous white American shit-lib to be the most vile characters around. While they may be the same color as me, they are in opposition to everything I believe in.


    So the problem is that any concept of race for someone like me is at this point a purely abstract exercise, completely divorced from any particular or specific considerations. In the past, this would not be true and race or ethnicity would have been tied to the particular interests and concerns of a specific corner of the world.

    This is why I find the concept of tribe more compelling in the current reality than race. I have a pretty cohesive local community in which we do a lot to help each other out and further shared goals and interests. Over the years there has also been a level of ideological convergence within that group as we find a measure of consensus and shared vision. There seems to be a high level of commitment to staying in the area and ensuring that our kids are able to as well should they choose to. This seems to me the beginning of a proto-culture.

    This is not an abstraction in any sense, but rooted in our day to day lives and interests and so is much more real, solid, and more likely durable than an identity rooted in a constructed racial identity. If you can assemble a group of people that think racially as you do, I suppose that you could do the same thing in a real life community, but I've not seen much evidence of such a thing.

    So what I see as the most important action is to build your own localized proto-culture if possible wherever you find yourself by choice or necessity. A collective purpose and vision also translates into political clout, as I've mentioned as per the local reasonableness and flexibility in applying the laws to conform to they way we want our lives to collectively be.

    So, you see why I take an interest in groups that have maintained a separate identity? It's not a matter of copying or LARPing, but there are principals to learn and emulate. The first and most basic are the uniting ties of specificity. Racism is basically a liberal reaction to loss of identity which puts the cart before the horse. Race is incidental, not the foundation of identity, but it is the natural result of that sharing of common place and common goals and traditions.

    And quite honestly my main goal in the medium term is to leave something better for my own children. Internet racism is going to accomplish nothing that way, while building a durable and coherent community around me will.
  437. @S
    @LatW


    “there have been huge migrations in the past in human history, this is just another big cycle, big population movement,” etc. As in, there is nothing at all special about this one. I just froze because of how final that statement sounded. Really, lady? What about the kids?
     
    I should have added to brainwashed, that they are delusional as well.



    If you ever have the time, check out the wiki entry for Robert J Lifton's 1961 book Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism and, in particular, the section of the entry on the 'Eight Criteria for Thought Reform'. It is very revealing as to what has been to people's minds via the corporate mass media. Multi-Culturalism and it's adherants have all the ear marks of being a gigantic cult.

    And what is even more crazy, is that the progressive whites are not doing this for some kind of a “social justice” reason, but mostly for class reasons – to signal class superiority. And they couldn’t even handle the results of what this ideology would wreak in the future. Nor will they themselves have to deal with the consequences of it (well, maybe at some point when they’re 89 or so).
     
    They have their virtue signaling. They also, as you allude, are due to their personal wealth in many instances somewhat insulated (for now) from the results of what they advocate.

    But trust me, the moment it comes to real reparations (hopefully, it doesn’t), who are they going to take from? Who will allow their wealth to be touched? The ones to be fleeced under this scenario would most likely be the ones in the middle and maybe upper middle class professionals.
     
    I agree. The main thing is to stop the error, ie colonization, slavery, etc. I mentioned Ghengis Khan and the Caliphate to show others had done wrong as well, and the practical impossibility of ever paying back. However, if a person feels bad about certain things, sure, do something to make amends, but within the context of you and yours living, not destroying one's self. [I say that as someone who doesn't like a great many things that were done in the past. I think empires are a bad business.]


    Those reparations on their part would be in conjunction with a true abolition of the still on going slavery, wage slavery

     

    Hahaha, I don’t know about that. What could replace “wage slavery”? There is a difference between “wage slavery” per se, and the “open borders, immigration / cheap (or not so cheap anymore) labor” set up.
     
    When I use the term 'wage slavery' I am not speaking about legitimate generic wage labor where someone might on occasion be paid a bit low, but specifically in regards to the phenomena of someone not wanting to pay (more often than not) their own people the prevailing real time local rates for the labor, and instead importing (typically by diktat) alien labor, aka 'immigrants', also known by the euphamism as 'cheap labor', to do the work for much less.

    These are people who have often been first reduced to an unnaturally low state of being, as who else would ever agree to work significantly below the local rates. [I submit, the flooding of China with opium in the the 19th century may have had the ulterior motive of 'opening up' China and it's hundreds of millions of people to enmasse predation as wage slaves, ie so called 'cheap labor'.]

    I see the term 'cheap labor' as a term of propaganda concocted by people who had historically been involved in chattel slavery and it's trade to sell people on this (for them) much more profitable poison. The term 'cheap labor', which has been around since the first half of the 19th century, as intended sounds quite innocuous.

    The term wage slavery much more accurately conveys what is going on, the systematic theft of significant value of the individual's labor being much more profitably and efficiently taken directly from their pay, ie their 'wages', and hence the term wage slavery, as opposed to via their being physically owned as cumbersome and costly to maintain property, ie 'chattel', and hence the term chattel slavery.

    I stand by the idea that chattel slavery and it's trade was monetized in the 19th century with the introduction of wage slavery (ie so called 'cheap labor') rather than having been abolished. My post archives flesh this out much more thoroughly than I do here.

    Right, create a narrative that goes something like “I recognize the past mistakes, I’m ready to move on, I no longer want to have anything to do with it, regardless of what others might think, this is my position from now on”.
     
    There's a powerful moral case to preserve peoplehood, or, at least have the right to, it's just been so poorly presented (generally) that few would know it.

    Replies: @LatW

    I should have added to brainwashed, that they are delusional as well.

    Of course, it’s delusional, but I also sense that these kinds of statements are partly defensive – they know deep in their heart that it is messed up and wrong, and they know that there isn’t anything they could or would do, so they just let it slide. And to make it sound somehow acceptable, they come up with this pseudo-argument that it’s a “historic process”, that it’s some kind of a natural movement of people or some other platitude. Whereas the European settlers came barely 400 years ago which is a very short period, historically speaking, to start significantly replacing a population.

    [MORE]

    ‘Eight Criteria for Thought Reform’. It is very revealing as to what has been to people’s minds via the corporate mass media. Multi-Culturalism and it’s adherants have all the ear marks of being a gigantic cult.

    Check this out:

    “Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism popularized the term “thought-terminating cliché“. This refers to a cliché that is a commonly used phrase, or folk wisdom, sometimes used to quell cognitive dissonance. Though the clichéd phrase in and of itself may be valid in certain contexts, its application as a means of dismissing dissent or justifying fallacious logic is what makes it thought-terminating.

    Examples include “Everything happens for a reason”, “Why? Because I said so” (Bare assertion fallacy), “I’m the parent, that’s why” (Appeal to authority), “To each his own”, “It’s a matter of opinion!”, “You only live once” (YOLO), and “We will have to agree to disagree”.”

    So saying something like “there have always been migrations”, “this is just another historic cycle” is a “thought-terminating cliché”.

    However, if a person feels bad about certain things, sure, do something to make amends, but within the context of you and yours living, not destroying one’s self.

    That’s actually a very tolerant approach. But it may be that “atonement” is really not the goal here, but control. Let’s assume that the reparations are somehow paid in the future. But does that mean that all the shaming about the “oppressive past” will end? Maybe it will only increase?

    One Hundred Years Progress of the United States. [..] Due to completely open borders for wage slavery (ie ‘cheap labor’) purposes, the United States is to have over 400 million people.

    400M is not very far from what the population has currently grown into (although it’s plateauing). One might think about what this might do to the natural landscape, even the urban landscape. Remember that there are also 22M tourists visiting the US every year. Of course, people should have access to the beauty of America, but the visitation is getting heavier and there is growing pressure on national preserves.

    My post archives flesh this out much more thoroughly than I do here.

    I’ll have to look into that, since it relates to freedom (in the context of capitalism).

    There’s a powerful moral case to preserve peoplehood, or, at least have the right to, it’s just been so poorly presented (generally) that few would know it.

    Well, they’ve connected the idea of progress with the destruction (or at least irrelevance of peoplehood / nation / nationality), they don’t view it anymore as a source of wellbeing or common good. Even though it is.

    • Replies: @S
    @LatW


    Of course, it’s delusional, but I also sense that these kinds of statements are partly defensive – they know deep in their heart that it is messed up and wrong, and they know that there isn’t anything they could or would do, so they just let it slide.
     
    I agree that deep in their hearts a good many of them realize they are doing wrong, and feel tremendous guilt about it, and are even a bit suicidal about it.

    But to stop engaging in wage slavery (ie so called 'cheap labor' acquired via 'mass immigration) would mean giving up the vast sums of money they are pocketing (Never!), not to mention the political power they grift off the 'migrants' in a divide and rule scheme using them directed against their own people.

    They'd rather die first than do that.

    So saying something like “there have always been migrations”, “this is just another historic cycle” is a “thought-terminating cliché”.
     
    Yes, I would add 'racist'/'racism' as another, 'thought stoppers', or, the 'language of non-thought' as Dr Lifton called it.

    That’s actually a very tolerant approach. But it may be that “atonement” is really not the goal here, but control.
     
    Yes, guilt and shame are being abused and manipulated as weapons, and to control. That's where, at some point, a person has to forgive themselves, even if others might not.

    As I mentioned, I sometimes like to remind myself that many of the past events used by the self described enlightened/progressive types to guilt trip Euros was done under their (ie Masonic) watch and guidance.

    Well, they’ve connected the idea of progress with the destruction (or at least irrelevance of peoplehood / nation / nationality), they don’t view it anymore as a source of wellbeing or common good..
     
    Yes, very simplistic. They are engaging in magical thinking.
    , @silviosilver
    @LatW


    But it may be that “atonement” is really not the goal here
     
    It's atonement without absolution.

    Funny thing is, if Turks acted like Brits (Swedes, Germans, whatever, totally cucked), even someone like me, to whom hating Turks comes as naturally as breathing, would by now have insisted dude, okay, okay, you're sorry, I get it, all is forgiven, now get off your knees, this is just embarrassing.
  438. @Yahya
    @Thulean Friend


    Authenticity is important and whatever flaws Silvio may or may not have, he is at least internally consistent in his politics. Whites in the Anglosphere have melded into one. In Europe, Eastern Europeans are still separate from Germanics and Nords to a greater extent than they are in Canada, Australia, USA etc. So Silvio’s politics is in fact rooted in his place, as he shares a common identity with other whites.
     
    Yes but you are forgetting that silviosilver is, by his own admission, a non-white Balkanoid who looks more like a Turk or Arab rather than a Slavic-looking "Eastern European" in a traditional sense. So his identification with whites is more of a "house nigger" type situation than a "common identity" based on racial similarities. Anglos, Germanics and Nords aren't really his people, as I think he'll readily admit, so his constant shilling for whites (and occasional denigration of people racially closer to him) is nothing to be admired, and is quite pathetic actually if you think about it.

    Replies: @Yevardian, @silviosilver

    So his identification with whites is more of a “house nigger” type situation than a “common identity” based on racial similarities.

    It would be, if that’s what I was actually doing. But I’m not doing that. I’m not knocking on their door, begging to be let in. They (WNs) came to me, not the other way around. I originally mightily resented their intrusion into my world, claiming my peeps for their cause. Firstly, because I thought that would create completely unnecessary racial division and insecurity among my own people, and secondly, because even if we were all included, it would indeed be as you say – those on the margins feeling like second class citizens, barely tolerated and looked down on. What kind of a fool would willingly put himself in a situation like that?

    Back when I thought ‘racism’ was wrong, it’s because I thought the inevitable outcome was something like a rerun of nazi Europe, so I wasn’t even willing to hear out the WN case. When I actually calmed down enough to examine it, I eventually concluded that okay, I might have severe misgivings about what these people stand for, but it was undeniable they had a moral case. If I believe that, what am I supposed to do, close my eyes to it and keep deceiving others and myself about the glories of multiracialism? My feeling is they – anglos, nothern europeans, call them what you will – did right by me (eventually anyway, lol), so it’s only fair I should do right by them. So yes, I will “shill” for their cause, not just because it’s a moral cause in its own right, but because given their existing demographic weight (still a majority in my country), they’re essential to any hope of racial separation, “racial living,” living in a society composed of your own kind.

    If I feel that way , why don’t I just “go back home” where I’ll be surrounded by my own kind? Well I tried that, on two separate occasions in the 2000s, which was enough to kill off any vestigial attachment to my supposed “homeland.” I decided I liked it better being a racial outsider but cultural insider (much less of a racial outsider now compared to then, my own experiences teach me) than a racial insider but cultural outsider, which is what I felt like. So if “home” for me is in the diaspora, then why not rearrange the diaspora to better suit me? If I had video game-like absolute dictatorial power, I would set up racially exclusive diaspora “statelets” tomorrow, with ample provision for those who actually want to persist in the multiracial diversity dream to live their way too. It’s a win-win for everyone.

    Now listen, arabs are far from some unknown quantity to me, such that I have to rely on (heavily biased) WN reports about you. For a long time my very best friends were these two Lebanese brothers and one of their cousins. Very loyal friends, cannot fault them. As you can probably imagine, a lot of the time I spent with them involved interactions with their wider families and the wider Lebanese community general. Those experiences make me want to spit when I hear guff about “arab hospitality.” Hospitality?!?!? From those fuckers? Lol. You had better update them that I look exactly like them, because they seemingly unfailingly identified me before I uttered a peep, and proceeded to treat me coldly and suspiciously. Way more likely to get an insulting “who are you?” (meaning “what are you doing here?”) than a warm greeting. The parents (and older types) were the worst. I suppose living in the diaspora was a bitter experience for them, and things would be different back in the Levant, but when you’ve gone through as much as I have with these fuckwits, you just don’t care anymore.

  439. @LatW
    @Dmitry


    Most people from warzone, is usually not responsible for it, in Ukraine, in the Middle East, in East Africa. Some part of people are compassionate to the victims of warzone, another part of people transfer blame for the warzone to its victims.
     
    Look, I was just trying to say that Eastern Slavic people have historically been subjected to exorbitant amounts of violence, that doesn't mean they are somehow more violent as people. There are many Ukrainians of various backgrounds, who have never been in the military, who have been pushed into this, doctors, software engineers, all kinds of professions.


    For enough years, AP has been my “internet friend”, so I know his views about this topic, have been the latter category, where history’s victims, are responsible for the crimes against them. He wrote it directly.
     
    I know, I didn't mean to interfere. I simply said that the most advanced arsenal on the planet (both Soviet & Western made, as well as Ukrainian made) is at work right now, which is extremely unfortunate, so the casualties are higher. I think some in the West do see this, thus they are sympathetic. And, yes, there are parallels with Syria, ofc.

    But from the Western European perspective, the response for Ukrainians is not too different than Syrians.
     
    It's hard to say, maybe you're right, but it looks like in some cases Ukrainians are favored because this seems very unjust and because they are EEs who at least seem to support democracy. This may sound trite, but there is something to it. I also suspect that some liberals in the West support them because it's safe to support a smaller white population that is attacked by somebody much larger and authoritarian.

    Sobchak
     
    Ivan Yakovina is a good analyst whom I enjoy following, so I trust his insight, although I wasn't aware that she was going to be sanctioned. The system has swallowed and ground up most of the real opposition and the screws are only being tightened now. But it's strange that they would attack her (apparently they raided her apartment, what for?), she's never struck me as all too "dangerous". Could it be that she just wanted to leave and asked her dad to get her an Israeli passport and to stage this exit? Or her family has some connections to groups that the administration doesn't trust? No idea. Afaik, they just changed her status to witness so she could come back? Tbh, she hasn't been the focus of my attention lately.

    Btw, did you see this, don't know if this is true:

    https://verstka.media/sotrudniki-vedomstv-begut-ot-mobilizacii/

    Replies: @Dmitry

    maybe you’re right, but it looks like in some cases Ukrainians are favored

    With the refugees topic, I think it is mostly just people in Western Europe who are compassionate, who are good Samaritans, who want to be helpful. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-KCefMou_4w. They are helping refugees not for a special political agenda (“Refugees welcome”), but they want to help refugees for moral reasons. Perhaps also virtue-signaling, which I think internet and social media is increasing incentives for virtue-signaling.

    But as oldtimer in this forum, I know AP’s views about the refugee topic. He believes helping refugees is an indication of weakness and Western decay, says even now Western Europeans are a “decaying society” because they build the housing for Syrians.

    Ukrainians are dependent for the same kindness of Westerners not differently than Syrians, but he continues writing about the same Western Europeans who are helping Ukrainians who he believes are “decaying Westerners” because of their moral principles that caused them to help refugees including Ukrainians.

    It reminds of JackD in the Sailer forum who is complaining about racism against Jews, in the same thread writing equal racism about other nationalities, without noticing the contradictions. I just find mysterious how people could have a lack of ethical principles when it doesn’t apply to the narrow group which they identified to their ego. It’s like they are missing the part of the brain which allows you to have ethics or morality.

    , I didn’t mean to interfere.

    Well you reminded me of the old thread and posts. https://www.unz.com/akarlin/sixth-proof/#comment-3206911 AP believes people who are victims of history, are “punished by God”. So, his Hindu religious views, imply that Ukrainians are being punished by Gods, or Gods. It sounds like Gods, as it is contradiction of a Christian view, the opposite of the New Testament.

    These views are one reason this forum was entertaining . I wouldn’t want to criticize it too much, as it wouldn’t be entertaining without this. Still, because sometimes it is not clear if people are actually serious, perhaps it needs to be said – victims of crimes are not responsible for the crimes against them

    In real world, most Ukrainians are not directly responsible for this disaster, neither most Russians. This is the same for most of the political disasters in the world. You’re living on a volcano, and you might know this, but the only thing you might be responsible for, is to not escape from the danger zone.

    Protection of refugees is ethically important, but also pretty complicated topic. For one example, refugees are often from failed countries and carry an organizational culture of their failed country to the developed world. For another example, it’s not always easy to know difference between refugees and economic immigrants. Also there is bad faith when people who support open borders immigration can be often using rhetoric about refugees, when they want to open borders for economic immigrants.

    Still, either you believe there should be protection of refugees or not. You can’t say “protect refugees when they are from my nationality I have connected my ego to”, but at the same time say it is a sign of Western decay when those refugees “are not my nationality”. The purpose of helping refugees was not self-interest for your chosen group.

    Could it be that she just wanted to leave and asked her dad to get her an Israeli passport

    I don’t think her Israeli passport can be so old as the 1990s when father was still living. Although she has connection to the Israeli government for some years, as she working as a promoter for their Minister of Tourism.

    she’s never struck me as all too “dangerous”.

    Sure, she is part of the game and has been enjoying the position of loyal pseudo-opposition.

    • Replies: @silviosilver
    @Dmitry


    It reminds of JackD in the Sailer forum who is complaining about racism against Jews, in the same thread writing equal racism about other nationalities, without noticing the contradictions.
     
    What are the supposed "contradictions"? Imo there aren't any. JackD believes WNs are wrong about Jews but right about blacks. Those beliefs are in no way contradictory.

    Still, either you believe there should be protection of refugees or not. You can’t say “protect refugees when they are from my nationality I have connected my ego to”, but at the same time say it is a sign of Western decay when those refugees “are not my nationality”.
     
    That's like saying you can't share your lunch with your friend but refuse to share it with strangers. Why can't I? It's my lunch, I'll share it with whoever I please. Or like saying a company isn't allowed to give jobs to some applicants but refuse others, it has to take on all applicants. What kind of retarded logic is that? Same thing my country.

    Ethnicity, race, religion, cultural identity - these are all excellent grounds for discriminating between "refugee" (99% bogus anyway) sources. It's one thousand percent justifiable to reject anyone on any one of these grounds.

    (To anyone's knowledge, has Dmitry ever huffed and moaned about Israel refusing Syrian "refugees"? They're rich and right next door, so one might well wonder how it is he's overlooked such a simple solution.)

    For another example, it’s not always easy to know difference between refugees and economic immigrants.
     
    You're right. And since we can't know who is legitimate and who is simply bullshitting, I guess we'll just have to say 'no' to everybody then. It's the country's well-being and demographic future at stake, so best not to gamble with it.

    Replies: @Dmitry

    , @AP
    @Dmitry


    Well you reminded me of the old thread and posts. https://www.unz.com/akarlin/sixth-proof/#comment-3206911 AP believes people who are victims of history, are “punished by God”. So, his Hindu religious views
     
    Why Hindu? As you know, locals in Rus blamed sin for the Mongol catastrophe. They were not Hindus.

    The non-Christian, Soviet parts of Ukraine is being most devastated by Putin. Meanwhile there is a real estate boom in the West, despite occasional blackouts now:

    https://i.imgur.com/Hhq0U2E.png

    The misery in the East is sad and terrible of course. It is a tragedy, nothing to celebrate.

    In real world, most Ukrainians are not directly responsible for this disaster, neither most Russians.
     
    Ukrainians certainly are not, because Ukraine did not invade other countries but was invaded.

    On the other hand, both Putin and the war are popular among Russians so they bear responsibility. Is it because you are from Russia that you try to muddy this clear issue?

    You’re living on a volcano
     
    Russians elected and reelected Putin and polls consistently show that Russians support the war. The support is starting to decline because Russians are dying in larger numbers but this just means Russians don't like to lose their own lives, but don't mind killing Ukrainians.

    Yes, not all Russians, but the majority.

    Still, either you believe there should be protection of refugees or not. You can’t say “protect refugees when they are from my nationality I have connected my ego to”, but at the same time say it is a sign of Western decay when those refugees “are not my nationality”
     
    Why?

    Replies: @Dmitry

  440. @LatW
    @S


    I should have added to brainwashed, that they are delusional as well.
     
    Of course, it's delusional, but I also sense that these kinds of statements are partly defensive - they know deep in their heart that it is messed up and wrong, and they know that there isn't anything they could or would do, so they just let it slide. And to make it sound somehow acceptable, they come up with this pseudo-argument that it's a "historic process", that it's some kind of a natural movement of people or some other platitude. Whereas the European settlers came barely 400 years ago which is a very short period, historically speaking, to start significantly replacing a population.

    ‘Eight Criteria for Thought Reform’. It is very revealing as to what has been to people’s minds via the corporate mass media. Multi-Culturalism and it’s adherants have all the ear marks of being a gigantic cult.
     
    Check this out:

    "Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism popularized the term "thought-terminating cliché". This refers to a cliché that is a commonly used phrase, or folk wisdom, sometimes used to quell cognitive dissonance. Though the clichéd phrase in and of itself may be valid in certain contexts, its application as a means of dismissing dissent or justifying fallacious logic is what makes it thought-terminating.

    Examples include “Everything happens for a reason”, “Why? Because I said so” (Bare assertion fallacy), “I’m the parent, that’s why” (Appeal to authority), “To each his own”, “It's a matter of opinion!”, “You only live once” (YOLO), and “We will have to agree to disagree”."
     
    So saying something like "there have always been migrations", "this is just another historic cycle" is a "thought-terminating cliché".

    However, if a person feels bad about certain things, sure, do something to make amends, but within the context of you and yours living, not destroying one’s self.
     
    That's actually a very tolerant approach. But it may be that "atonement" is really not the goal here, but control. Let's assume that the reparations are somehow paid in the future. But does that mean that all the shaming about the "oppressive past" will end? Maybe it will only increase?

    One Hundred Years Progress of the United States. [..] Due to completely open borders for wage slavery (ie ‘cheap labor’) purposes, the United States is to have over 400 million people.
     
    400M is not very far from what the population has currently grown into (although it's plateauing). One might think about what this might do to the natural landscape, even the urban landscape. Remember that there are also 22M tourists visiting the US every year. Of course, people should have access to the beauty of America, but the visitation is getting heavier and there is growing pressure on national preserves.

    My post archives flesh this out much more thoroughly than I do here.
     
    I'll have to look into that, since it relates to freedom (in the context of capitalism).

    There’s a powerful moral case to preserve peoplehood, or, at least have the right to, it’s just been so poorly presented (generally) that few would know it.
     
    Well, they've connected the idea of progress with the destruction (or at least irrelevance of peoplehood / nation / nationality), they don't view it anymore as a source of wellbeing or common good. Even though it is.

    Replies: @S, @silviosilver

    Of course, it’s delusional, but I also sense that these kinds of statements are partly defensive – they know deep in their heart that it is messed up and wrong, and they know that there isn’t anything they could or would do, so they just let it slide.

    I agree that deep in their hearts a good many of them realize they are doing wrong, and feel tremendous guilt about it, and are even a bit suicidal about it.

    But to stop engaging in wage slavery (ie so called ‘cheap labor’ acquired via ‘mass immigration) would mean giving up the vast sums of money they are pocketing (Never!), not to mention the political power they grift off the ‘migrants’ in a divide and rule scheme using them directed against their own people.

    They’d rather die first than do that.

    So saying something like “there have always been migrations”, “this is just another historic cycle” is a “thought-terminating cliché”.

    Yes, I would add ‘racist’/’racism’ as another, ‘thought stoppers’, or, the ‘language of non-thought’ as Dr Lifton called it.

    That’s actually a very tolerant approach. But it may be that “atonement” is really not the goal here, but control.

    Yes, guilt and shame are being abused and manipulated as weapons, and to control. That’s where, at some point, a person has to forgive themselves, even if others might not.

    As I mentioned, I sometimes like to remind myself that many of the past events used by the self described enlightened/progressive types to guilt trip Euros was done under their (ie Masonic) watch and guidance.

    Well, they’ve connected the idea of progress with the destruction (or at least irrelevance of peoplehood / nation / nationality), they don’t view it anymore as a source of wellbeing or common good..

    Yes, very simplistic. They are engaging in magical thinking.

  441. Bashibuzuk says:
    @LatW
    @Bashibuzuk

    It's called "burden sharing". 😊

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

    https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2022/09/poland-will-have-a-large-and-modern-tank-army.html

    Poland is preparing to fight RusFed in the Baltics and Ukraine. Poland intends to become the focal point for the assembly of the Intermarium.

    The Intermarium is put in place to prevent the economic connectivity between Old Europe (France, Italy, Germany…) and China through the territories currently controlled, or in the case of Belarus, influenced by the RusFed.

    Old Europe is being sacrificed by the Atlanticist branch of the Globalist to prevent the appearance of the Eurasian economic and military superpower in which China and Old Europe would be the major stakeholders, with RusFed, Iran and Turkey being the minor ones.

    Poland is gambling to become an additional major stakeholder in this geopolitical situation that will define the first half of the twenty-first century in Eurasia. It plays the role of the Atlanticist redoubt in Europe (Fort Trump for G-d’s sake…)

    Poland is playing its hand as usual, in a somewhat demonstrative manner. They could have ordered their main battle tanks and other military upgrades in Old Europe, but they didn’t. By choosing to proceed that way they (over ?) emphasize their independence and what they see as their growing clout in the Eurasian affairs.

    As usual, Poland might end up punching above their weight. It has happened before and we know how it usually ends when it happens. Old Europe will not go gentle into that good night, it might well push Poland towards a direct confrontational with the RusFed in Ukraine, Belarus and the Baltics, and then backstab it when the going gets tough.

    https://www.thenationalnews.com/world/europe/2022/10/13/france-wont-retaliate-with-nuclear-weapons-if-russia-uses-them-in-ukraine/

    That would be some burden sharing all right: Poland and the Baltics would shoulder the burden, fall when backstabbed, and do some sharing with Germany clawing its lost historical territories back.

    Then OBOR would go through RusFed, Belarus and the German Baltic territories (including Königsberg) with the Nord Stream pipelines magically spirited back to life.

    That would allow for the birth of Eurasia from Dublin to Vladivostok with Han Chinese characteristics. China and Old Europe would have won this round of the Great Game 2.0.

    https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3197667/german-chancellor-olaf-scholz-visit-china-next-week

    [MORE]


    Expectations…

    Reality… ?

    🙂

    • Replies: @Beckow
    @Bashibuzuk


    ...As usual, Poland might end up punching above their weight. It has happened before and we know how it usually ends when it happens.
     
    When you punch above your weight you have to go dirty. So far only in rhetoric, e.g. the constant lying, but as it escalates it will get really dirty.

    When you fight dirty, you must win - Poles know that story better than anyone. They were promised full backing, but that happened before. Full backing is never quite as full when fighting Russia. I wish the misguided Lachs all the luck they can muster, but this will be an uphill fight. They will almost certainly come out of it worse off. Then they will make sad movies and write tear-jerk poems.

    The plans by all sides no longer matter: people plan and then reality happens. None of it is going to unfold the way any of the sides have planned - this is for all marbles and nobody will be willing to lose face. We may make it through, or not, but the nostalgia for how it was before the mad men decided that Nato in Ukraine and Russians out of there is a great idea will be the overwhelming consensus.

    They all look so freaking calm, maybe they know that there is no way to stop this, so why get too emotional?

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @Wokechoke

    , @Mr. Hack
    @Bashibuzuk


    Poland is preparing to fight RusFed in the Baltics and Ukraine. Poland intends to become the focal point for the assembly of the Intermarium.
     
    But wouldn't such actions rub up against strict NATO prohibitions to not take such direct involvement within this war? Or do you also think that all of NATO will soon support a more active involvement in this war? I don't think that Poland will be bold enough (or perhaps foolish enough?) to sever its relations with NATO in order to pursue some sort of "Intermarum" realignment of Europe's map?..I've always just thought of this topic as some sort of personal pet project that AP was supporting, and now find out that it has even more prominent teeth. :-)

    https://neweasterneurope.eu/new_site/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Ska%CC%88rmavbild-2018-08-14-kl.-23.06.19.png
    https://neweasterneurope.eu/2018/09/25/ukrainian-far-right-become-one-biggest-proponents-intermarium/

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

    , @Wokechoke
    @Bashibuzuk

    When the Prussians and Austrians fought for supremacy, Poles hedged their bets and fought on both sides slightly favouring Berlin. Fair enough you say, but as soon as Prussia was on the losing side against the British the Poles switch to loyal Anglo-Saxon-American alignment. Jackals really.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

    , @AP
    @Bashibuzuk


    The Intermarium is put in place to prevent the economic connectivity between Old Europe (France, Italy, Germany…) and China through the territories currently controlled, or in the case of Belarus, influenced by the RusFed.
     
    Intermarium provides shelter from both Western would-be masters and Eastern despots. Khmelnytsky's treason doomed both Poland and Ukraine for centuries. This is finally becoming better understood and undone. The Russians and their tools see it - thus, their bringing up Bandera at every opportunity. It isn't working. Historically, Russia + Ukraine have done well in wars, but Russia alone could not handle Poland + Ukraine. When Poland and Ukraine were united they captured Moscow.* When Russia was without Ukraine it failed to defeat Poland (1921). Russia is unable to conquer Ukraine alone, the best it is doing is holding 15% (having grabbed 20% in the beginning) while bleeding out.

    Poland is playing its hand as usual, in a somewhat demonstrative manner. They could have ordered their main battle tanks and other military upgrades in Old Europe, but they didn’t.
     
    Because Germany is viewed as hesitant and unreliable. Not the best long-term strategic partner. Korea offered a much better deal: hundreds of tanks, plus joint production in Poland.

    *Had this victory been consolidated there would have been peace and unity among the Slavs and their Baltic cousins.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk, @AnonfromTN

    , @LatW
    @Bashibuzuk

    Thank you for your intelligent comment, as usual, it is good to be able to read an alternative view.


    Poland is preparing to fight RusFed in the Baltics and Ukraine. Poland intends to become the focal point for the assembly of the Intermarium.
     
    Well, everyone will fight together, hopefully, if RusFed manages to attack. Now or in 20 or 30 years, either way. Frankly, it's about time that Poland (and the region in general) started thinking about its military, to go for 30 years without a serious military in this region is a luxury. That vacuum needed to be filled. Finland, for example, had a good relationship with Russia because it could always lean on their military and reserves.

    The Intermarium is put in place to prevent the economic connectivity between Old Europe (France, Italy, Germany…) and China through the territories currently controlled, or in the case of Belarus, influenced by the RusFed.
     
    Of course, one can always read it that way, but the original idea of the Intermarium originated as an attempt to defend the region from both sides. The original ideas were developed already in the 1920s (in fact, even during the Civil War in the Russian Empire, interestingly, some of the founding ideologues of the Intermarium actually fought alongside with the Whites). At that time neither the US, nor China were as prominent as they are today. (Yes, Britain was, but not to the extent to manage the whole region).

    As to the economic connectivity, before 2020 and within the security arrangement that lasted until 2022, the trade between the EU and Russia was increasing, Russia's export structure was starting to change from just raw material to more of actual product and Ukraine, too, started trading more. Everyone was benefiting. Had the RusFed not made the ultimatum in December 2021, this would have continued to everyone's benefit (despite the problems started in 2014).

    Also, looking further back into the past, some of the pipelines were closed by Russia for political reasons already in the 1990s (due to the Karaganov doctrine to use energy as a political tool). It didn't have to happen (I doubt there was some strict diktat from the US or UK to close those pipes, that came from the RusFed side).

    Old Europe is being sacrificed by the Atlanticist branch of the Globalist to prevent the appearance of the Eurasian economic and military superpower in which China and Old Europe would be the major stakeholders, with RusFed, Iran and Turkey being the minor ones.
     
    These kinds of projects of massive global scale (same as the USSR), in order to work, need to be created in a way that every participant's interests are protected and their needs are met. Not through domination because that doesn't work on the micro level. When you invite large stakeholders such as China, you need to consider everyone's interests. Not just interests of German businesses or Russian / Chinese oligarchs.

    Poland is gambling to become an additional major stakeholder in this geopolitical situation that will define the first half of the twenty-first century in Eurasia.
     
    Poland wants peace in the region so it can continue to thrive. Poland et al want a space where their own can develop, where they themselves are given priority and not outsiders (who ever they may be).

    They could have ordered their main battle tanks and other military upgrades in Old Europe, but they didn’t. By choosing to proceed that way they (over ?) emphasize their independence and what they see as their growing clout in the Eurasian affairs.
     
    The military equipment is sourced from several countries that are the main global producers. Germany, US, Israel, South Korea, Sweden, Finland, Turkey, those being the top producers of the best weapons and there is a limited number of producers who can deliver the required amount in a limited time frame for the best price. Germany put her military production on the back burner for many years and Germany is also reluctant to sell for political reasons (which is understandable). Afaik, the German tanks are also more expensive and not as readily available.

    As usual, Poland might end up punching above their weight. It has happened before and we know how it usually ends when it happens. Old Europe will not go gentle into that good night, it might well push Poland towards a direct confrontational with the RusFed in Ukraine, Belarus and the Baltics, and then backstab it when the going gets tough
     
    .

    We don't know how the chips will fall. One must learn from history and it is certainly tempting to draw these comparisons, but, as Heraclitus said, you cannot step in the same river twice, panta rei - everything flows, everything is in a flux, everything is a struggle.

    As to direct confrontation with RusFed (let's hope that doesn't happen), if there are more attacks on Western Ukraine, the kind that have already happened and if they escalate, that objectively becomes a big problem for Poland (and even Romania). RusFed could've stayed in Donbas (plus Belarus), but they decided to push further, much further (see the terms of the ultimatum). They decided to push for more than they can take.

    In the longer perspective, hopefully, there is one more chance to make up with Russia. The odds are low, but if there is even as little as 1% possibility, it should be used.

    That would allow for the birth of Eurasia from Dublin to Vladivostok with Han Chinese characteristics.
     
    Did you ask the Dubliners (will their job be to provide Guinness?) and the Siberians? As to Han Chinese characteristics, if that's what the majority of Russians want... alas, it's their land.

    And just a note about money. Poland is now Germany's 5th largest trading partner (Poland recently surpassed Italy that way), so their trade volumes are consistently high. Germany doesn't object.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

  442. @Bashibuzuk
    @LatW

    https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2022/09/poland-will-have-a-large-and-modern-tank-army.html

    Poland is preparing to fight RusFed in the Baltics and Ukraine. Poland intends to become the focal point for the assembly of the Intermarium.

    The Intermarium is put in place to prevent the economic connectivity between Old Europe (France, Italy, Germany...) and China through the territories currently controlled, or in the case of Belarus, influenced by the RusFed.

    Old Europe is being sacrificed by the Atlanticist branch of the Globalist to prevent the appearance of the Eurasian economic and military superpower in which China and Old Europe would be the major stakeholders, with RusFed, Iran and Turkey being the minor ones.

    Poland is gambling to become an additional major stakeholder in this geopolitical situation that will define the first half of the twenty-first century in Eurasia. It plays the role of the Atlanticist redoubt in Europe (Fort Trump for G-d's sake...)

    Poland is playing its hand as usual, in a somewhat demonstrative manner. They could have ordered their main battle tanks and other military upgrades in Old Europe, but they didn't. By choosing to proceed that way they (over ?) emphasize their independence and what they see as their growing clout in the Eurasian affairs.

    As usual, Poland might end up punching above their weight. It has happened before and we know how it usually ends when it happens. Old Europe will not go gentle into that good night, it might well push Poland towards a direct confrontational with the RusFed in Ukraine, Belarus and the Baltics, and then backstab it when the going gets tough.

    https://www.thenationalnews.com/world/europe/2022/10/13/france-wont-retaliate-with-nuclear-weapons-if-russia-uses-them-in-ukraine/

    That would be some burden sharing all right: Poland and the Baltics would shoulder the burden, fall when backstabbed, and do some sharing with Germany clawing its lost historical territories back.

    Then OBOR would go through RusFed, Belarus and the German Baltic territories (including Königsberg) with the Nord Stream pipelines magically spirited back to life.

    That would allow for the birth of Eurasia from Dublin to Vladivostok with Han Chinese characteristics. China and Old Europe would have won this round of the Great Game 2.0.

    https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3197667/german-chancellor-olaf-scholz-visit-china-next-week

    https://ic.pics.livejournal.com/fon_eichwald/43081844/57393/57393_640.jpg

    Expectations...

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/aa/Poland_can_into_Wikipedia.jpg

    Reality... ?

    🙂

    Replies: @Beckow, @Mr. Hack, @Wokechoke, @AP, @LatW

    …As usual, Poland might end up punching above their weight. It has happened before and we know how it usually ends when it happens.

    When you punch above your weight you have to go dirty. So far only in rhetoric, e.g. the constant lying, but as it escalates it will get really dirty.

    When you fight dirty, you must win – Poles know that story better than anyone. They were promised full backing, but that happened before. Full backing is never quite as full when fighting Russia. I wish the misguided Lachs all the luck they can muster, but this will be an uphill fight. They will almost certainly come out of it worse off. Then they will make sad movies and write tear-jerk poems.

    The plans by all sides no longer matter: people plan and then reality happens. None of it is going to unfold the way any of the sides have planned – this is for all marbles and nobody will be willing to lose face. We may make it through, or not, but the nostalgia for how it was before the mad men decided that Nato in Ukraine and Russians out of there is a great idea will be the overwhelming consensus.

    They all look so freaking calm, maybe they know that there is no way to stop this, so why get too emotional?

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @Beckow


    They all look so freaking calm, maybe they know that there is no way to stop this, so why get too emotional?
     
    Unfortunately, for most Americans the war in Ukraine has become not much more than a certain segment within the national news in the evening, usually about half way through the program, very sympathetic towards Ukraine and critical of Russia. Judging by the responses of Europeans like yourself and German_Reader that live much closer to the theater of action, directly receiving more refugees from this war, the interest level is much higher.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk, @Beckow

    , @Wokechoke
    @Beckow

    Napoleon's Cavalry were almost all Polish. They bit it in Borodino/Moscow. Wellington got a dose of them at Waterloo as well. Metternich did nothing wrong.

  443. @Dmitry
    @LatW


    maybe you’re right, but it looks like in some cases Ukrainians are favored
     
    With the refugees topic, I think it is mostly just people in Western Europe who are compassionate, who are good Samaritans, who want to be helpful. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-KCefMou_4w. They are helping refugees not for a special political agenda ("Refugees welcome"), but they want to help refugees for moral reasons. Perhaps also virtue-signaling, which I think internet and social media is increasing incentives for virtue-signaling.

    But as oldtimer in this forum, I know AP's views about the refugee topic. He believes helping refugees is an indication of weakness and Western decay, says even now Western Europeans are a "decaying society" because they build the housing for Syrians.

    Ukrainians are dependent for the same kindness of Westerners not differently than Syrians, but he continues writing about the same Western Europeans who are helping Ukrainians who he believes are "decaying Westerners" because of their moral principles that caused them to help refugees including Ukrainians.

    It reminds of JackD in the Sailer forum who is complaining about racism against Jews, in the same thread writing equal racism about other nationalities, without noticing the contradictions. I just find mysterious how people could have a lack of ethical principles when it doesn't apply to the narrow group which they identified to their ego. It's like they are missing the part of the brain which allows you to have ethics or morality.

    , I didn’t mean to interfere.
     
    Well you reminded me of the old thread and posts. https://www.unz.com/akarlin/sixth-proof/#comment-3206911 AP believes people who are victims of history, are "punished by God". So, his Hindu religious views, imply that Ukrainians are being punished by Gods, or Gods. It sounds like Gods, as it is contradiction of a Christian view, the opposite of the New Testament.

    These views are one reason this forum was entertaining . I wouldn't want to criticize it too much, as it wouldn't be entertaining without this. Still, because sometimes it is not clear if people are actually serious, perhaps it needs to be said - victims of crimes are not responsible for the crimes against them

    In real world, most Ukrainians are not directly responsible for this disaster, neither most Russians. This is the same for most of the political disasters in the world. You're living on a volcano, and you might know this, but the only thing you might be responsible for, is to not escape from the danger zone.

    Protection of refugees is ethically important, but also pretty complicated topic. For one example, refugees are often from failed countries and carry an organizational culture of their failed country to the developed world. For another example, it's not always easy to know difference between refugees and economic immigrants. Also there is bad faith when people who support open borders immigration can be often using rhetoric about refugees, when they want to open borders for economic immigrants.

    Still, either you believe there should be protection of refugees or not. You can't say "protect refugees when they are from my nationality I have connected my ego to", but at the same time say it is a sign of Western decay when those refugees "are not my nationality". The purpose of helping refugees was not self-interest for your chosen group.

    Could it be that she just wanted to leave and asked her dad to get her an Israeli passport
     
    I don't think her Israeli passport can be so old as the 1990s when father was still living. Although she has connection to the Israeli government for some years, as she working as a promoter for their Minister of Tourism.

    she’s never struck me as all too “dangerous”.
     
    Sure, she is part of the game and has been enjoying the position of loyal pseudo-opposition.

    Replies: @silviosilver, @AP

    It reminds of JackD in the Sailer forum who is complaining about racism against Jews, in the same thread writing equal racism about other nationalities, without noticing the contradictions.

    What are the supposed “contradictions”? Imo there aren’t any. JackD believes WNs are wrong about Jews but right about blacks. Those beliefs are in no way contradictory.

    Still, either you believe there should be protection of refugees or not. You can’t say “protect refugees when they are from my nationality I have connected my ego to”, but at the same time say it is a sign of Western decay when those refugees “are not my nationality”.

    That’s like saying you can’t share your lunch with your friend but refuse to share it with strangers. Why can’t I? It’s my lunch, I’ll share it with whoever I please. Or like saying a company isn’t allowed to give jobs to some applicants but refuse others, it has to take on all applicants. What kind of retarded logic is that? Same thing my country.

    Ethnicity, race, religion, cultural identity – these are all excellent grounds for discriminating between “refugee” (99% bogus anyway) sources. It’s one thousand percent justifiable to reject anyone on any one of these grounds.

    (To anyone’s knowledge, has Dmitry ever huffed and moaned about Israel refusing Syrian “refugees”? They’re rich and right next door, so one might well wonder how it is he’s overlooked such a simple solution.)

    For another example, it’s not always easy to know difference between refugees and economic immigrants.

    You’re right. And since we can’t know who is legitimate and who is simply bullshitting, I guess we’ll just have to say ‘no’ to everybody then. It’s the country’s well-being and demographic future at stake, so best not to gamble with it.

    • Agree: sudden death
    • Replies: @Dmitry
    @silviosilver


    we’ll just have to say ‘no’ to everybody then. It’s the country’s well-being and demographic future at stake

     

    I don't think supporting refugees in the context where you can't distinguish from economic immigration or add time-limits in the reality, is part of self-interest of Western European citizens and wrote enough my views about this topic.
    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-169/#comment-4996173

    But there is still a problem of refugees and need of solution, for needing protection from war and persecution is the one of the most basic things we deserve. You would still need an internationally ruled territory, like artificial country, for their shelter, if they are not equally distributed by the countries near the conflict.

    I fund Ukrainian refugees, even while not being European, so I can't say I'm helping this problem. There is also no reason refugees have to be disproportionately more in developed countries than undeveloped countries. Syrians could go to Bolivia and we could have funded Ukrainian refugees to safety in Zambia. Being refugee doesn't need to upgrade your conditions, the meaning is to give you a safe place.

    One of the conditions in the UN convention on refugees, is the obligation is for the first safe country to give protection. So, e.g. obligation for shelter of Syrians, is the regional countries, not Europe, Singapore or New Zealand.


    Ethnicity, race, religion, cultural identity – these are all excellent grounds for discriminating between “refugee”
     
    Those are normal discriminating between immigrants, but refugees are people who you would not accept as an immigrant, but which are receiving temporary shelter.

    Every main country has signed a contract about refugees in the 1951. Read articles 3 and 4. Also you can see refugee is a temporary shelter etc.
    https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/1951_Refugee_Convention

    Refugee is not supposed to be the same category as immigration. They are given shelter on basis of the danger, temporary, time-limit and should also be in the first safe country.

    Perhaps before the Second World War, refugee has a different meaning. But after the Second World War, there is a clear legal concept of refugee and it's based on needing shelter, not immigration.


    supposed “contradictions”? Imo there aren’t any. Jack D believes WNs are wrong about Jews but right about blacks
     
    Jack D is writing people are unfair about Jews, criticizing based on small stories, to the racist views about general group, and then in same thread writes how his dog dislikes black people. In the next post. If Jack D was not born in a family with a Jewish ancestor, he would have be the most racist against Jewish people in this forum. It's like God is trying to teach him something but he still avoids the implications.

    As for AP. When you are complaining that Western Europeans are not real Europe because they help refugees, which is the same basis that they help Ukrainian refugees, or that it's good Eastern Europe should divert German money because this money would go to fund refugees. But then write about he is helping Ukrainian refugees in Europe.

    The basis for his argument that Eastern Europe should pull Western Europeans' money, is because Western Europeans were giving money for refugees. (https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-200/#comment-5622490) If AP was not born in a family with ancestors from a third world warzone, but with 100% pure Swiss or English blood. Well it's also like God is trying to tell him something with its choice of family origin.


    Dmitry ever huffed and moaned about Israel refusing Syrian “refugees”?
     
    I never wrote any post criticizing countries for refusing refugees, except in one post, Israel is the only country I criticized one time for too strict policy against refugees (https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-179-russia-ukraine-cont/#comment-5226796), although even then with the restrictive Israel policy, it is perhaps unfair.

    To be fair about Israel, there is already some chaos there with the refugees from East Africa which you can see when you visit them, because there are no diplomatic relations with the source country of refugees (Sudan), the time-limits are not possible to impose and it converted to permanent immigration a decade later.

    Syrian refugees would be similar there, as the High Court would never allow the time-limits as Israel and Syria are in war with each other and they would become a permanent immigration. However, with Ukrainian refugees, Israel had no easy justification to avoid the 1951 convention on refugees. Israel and Ukraine have diplomatic relations, so time-limit could be followed. They could argue they are not the first country for Ukrainians to escape to, but a lot of Ukrainians bought a plane ticket. Then many trapped in the airport or returned to Ukraine. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_YoVgQK2Mg.

  444. @LatW
    @S


    I should have added to brainwashed, that they are delusional as well.
     
    Of course, it's delusional, but I also sense that these kinds of statements are partly defensive - they know deep in their heart that it is messed up and wrong, and they know that there isn't anything they could or would do, so they just let it slide. And to make it sound somehow acceptable, they come up with this pseudo-argument that it's a "historic process", that it's some kind of a natural movement of people or some other platitude. Whereas the European settlers came barely 400 years ago which is a very short period, historically speaking, to start significantly replacing a population.

    ‘Eight Criteria for Thought Reform’. It is very revealing as to what has been to people’s minds via the corporate mass media. Multi-Culturalism and it’s adherants have all the ear marks of being a gigantic cult.
     
    Check this out:

    "Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism popularized the term "thought-terminating cliché". This refers to a cliché that is a commonly used phrase, or folk wisdom, sometimes used to quell cognitive dissonance. Though the clichéd phrase in and of itself may be valid in certain contexts, its application as a means of dismissing dissent or justifying fallacious logic is what makes it thought-terminating.

    Examples include “Everything happens for a reason”, “Why? Because I said so” (Bare assertion fallacy), “I’m the parent, that’s why” (Appeal to authority), “To each his own”, “It's a matter of opinion!”, “You only live once” (YOLO), and “We will have to agree to disagree”."
     
    So saying something like "there have always been migrations", "this is just another historic cycle" is a "thought-terminating cliché".

    However, if a person feels bad about certain things, sure, do something to make amends, but within the context of you and yours living, not destroying one’s self.
     
    That's actually a very tolerant approach. But it may be that "atonement" is really not the goal here, but control. Let's assume that the reparations are somehow paid in the future. But does that mean that all the shaming about the "oppressive past" will end? Maybe it will only increase?

    One Hundred Years Progress of the United States. [..] Due to completely open borders for wage slavery (ie ‘cheap labor’) purposes, the United States is to have over 400 million people.
     
    400M is not very far from what the population has currently grown into (although it's plateauing). One might think about what this might do to the natural landscape, even the urban landscape. Remember that there are also 22M tourists visiting the US every year. Of course, people should have access to the beauty of America, but the visitation is getting heavier and there is growing pressure on national preserves.

    My post archives flesh this out much more thoroughly than I do here.
     
    I'll have to look into that, since it relates to freedom (in the context of capitalism).

    There’s a powerful moral case to preserve peoplehood, or, at least have the right to, it’s just been so poorly presented (generally) that few would know it.
     
    Well, they've connected the idea of progress with the destruction (or at least irrelevance of peoplehood / nation / nationality), they don't view it anymore as a source of wellbeing or common good. Even though it is.

    Replies: @S, @silviosilver

    But it may be that “atonement” is really not the goal here

    It’s atonement without absolution.

    Funny thing is, if Turks acted like Brits (Swedes, Germans, whatever, totally cucked), even someone like me, to whom hating Turks comes as naturally as breathing, would by now have insisted dude, okay, okay, you’re sorry, I get it, all is forgiven, now get off your knees, this is just embarrassing.

  445. @Mikel
    @Barbarossa


    Sikhs, Muslims, Amish etc. have actual beliefs that they take seriously enough to die for. Absent that level of commitment it’s all just empty materialism.
     
    I seriously disagree with this point.

    Humanity doesn't need more people willing to die and kill for political or religious issues, it needs to move past that ancestral tradition. I used to think that we were slowly moving in that direction after the end of the Cold War, the expansion of the EU to countries that used to be enemies for centuries and the globalized trade of the past decades but sadly, it was just a period of calm before the storm, as we're now witnessing.

    It may be beyond the capabilities of the human species, absent some future genetic reprogramming, but the problem with continuing to war among ourselves for "beliefs" is that technological progress made us enter a completely new era 77 years ago where the possibility of destroying civilized life on the planet in one of those wars became real. For 40 years we toyed with Armaggedon in a clash between the beliefs in capitalism/democracy versus communism and now we have entered a new era where we are again toying with the same catastrophe for even more trivial beliefs, hardly more consequential than a pissing contest.

    We are probably not capable of destroying our own species in a war yet but, as time progresses, I see no reason why we won't reach that capability so learning to avoid wars between nations, tribes and religious or political groups is more than just preventing the senseless massacres that we have experienced throughout history, it's a necessary condition for the ultimate preservation of our species.

    From this perspective, materialism may not be a very worthy ideal per se but if it leads people in the advanced countries to reject the idea of dying and killing for "beliefs", it may be a positive development.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Sher Singh, @Barbarossa, @silviosilver, @Coconuts

    Humanity doesn’t need more people willing to die and kill for political or religious issues, it needs to move past that ancestral tradition.

    One way of seeing this is as the idea of liberal pacification and the end of politics; the only discussions that will take place in such a universal human society will be similar to those between academics in their professional capacity, or purely technical in nature between specialists similar to engineering discussions. There won’t be any conflicts of interest that gives rise to the formation of competing groups and the friend/enemy group distinction anywhere.

    (From some points of view this conception seems like a secularisation of the older Christian tradition about Providence (into Progress) and the advent of the Kingdom of God (pacified Humanity). Reading about the Enlightenment and then German Idealism in Hegel and Fichte, later Marx’s materialism, it sometimes feels like watching how this secularisation took place.)

    Understanding of evolution and human evolution specifically raises questions about how plausible the advent of this universal state of pacification is. Possibly it is not even a possibility given the kind of animal humans are.

    Attempts to bring it into existence in reality may end up more like a kind of universal despotism and mouse utopia, where conditions are so mismatched for normal human reproduction that large parts of the human population dies away through sterility, illness and evolutionarily aberrant behaviour. Good for the perpetuation of the genes of the survivors though?

    [MORE]

    We are probably not capable of destroying our own species in a war yet but, as time progresses, I see no reason why we won’t reach that capability so learning to avoid wars between nations, tribes and religious or political groups is more than just preventing the senseless massacres that we have experienced throughout history, it’s a necessary condition for the ultimate preservation of our species.

    This is part of the argument for things like archaeofuturism; the Enlightenment state ceases to represent ‘the externalisation of mankind’s reason’ or the instrument of infinite Progress (‘God standing on earth’) and becomes a major threat in itself.

    • Agree: Bashibuzuk
    • Replies: @Beckow
    @Coconuts


    ...Understanding human evolution raises questions about how plausible the advent of this universal state of pacification is. Possibly it is not even a possibility given the kind of animal humans are.
     
    Only some are animals. Even if we add up all the players who got us to this point in Ukraine - on all sides - they would amount to few tens of thousands. Most people naturally didn't care, and still don't care.

    My bias is to blame those who moved first - the fire-breathing chicken hawks dreaming about defeating Russia. Maybe for resources, maybe some belated revenge, maybe because it is there. It is unquestionable that all the initial moves: bombing Serbia, Iraq, Syria,...Maidan, Ukraine in Nato and "screw the Russians living in Ukraine", were made by the West.

    We can endlessly discuss whether the reaction by Russia was right or not, I fail to see much of a choice they had. Then we get all hot under the collar about morality and rules, etc...the reality is simply that wars are not a good context for conscience or playing nice.

    Yeah, there was no possibility of that universal state - because the morons running the Western security establishment were never in that state. That was a prerequisite.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    , @Mikel
    @Coconuts


    Understanding of evolution and human evolution specifically raises questions about how plausible the advent of this universal state of pacification is. Possibly it is not even a possibility given the kind of animal humans are.
     
    You are probably right but the fact that there seems to be a positive correlation between the development of a country and the willingness of its inhabitants to kill or die for beliefs may be telling us something perhaps positive about human nature too.

    Granted, these people don't much care when the professional armies of their countries do engage in pointless wars far away and may even be supportive of them, given an adequate informative conditioning (or for the simple reason of supporting their national team, so to speak). But less people willing to go to war should lead to less wars, all else being equal. In fact, how much do even professional soldiers fight for beliefs these days? I don't think that most of them would go to war as unpaid volunteers so not much, probably.

    Another important point raised by Beckow is that historically it has been a minority at the top who have decided to start wars, especially the most ideological ones. The masses have always been brainwashed and/or directly forced to take part in the hostilities. Past the tribal state, most people probably prefer to lead peaceful lives rather than to fight enemies. Beckow then goes on a contradictory tangent with the strange claim that the Russians just had no choice but to engage in the wholesale killing of Russophones that they're now carrying out in Eastern Ukraine but that is another matter.

    Replies: @sudden death, @Beckow, @Coconuts, @Coconuts

  446. @Coconuts
    @Mikel


    Humanity doesn’t need more people willing to die and kill for political or religious issues, it needs to move past that ancestral tradition.
     
    One way of seeing this is as the idea of liberal pacification and the end of politics; the only discussions that will take place in such a universal human society will be similar to those between academics in their professional capacity, or purely technical in nature between specialists similar to engineering discussions. There won't be any conflicts of interest that gives rise to the formation of competing groups and the friend/enemy group distinction anywhere.

    (From some points of view this conception seems like a secularisation of the older Christian tradition about Providence (into Progress) and the advent of the Kingdom of God (pacified Humanity). Reading about the Enlightenment and then German Idealism in Hegel and Fichte, later Marx's materialism, it sometimes feels like watching how this secularisation took place.)

    Understanding of evolution and human evolution specifically raises questions about how plausible the advent of this universal state of pacification is. Possibly it is not even a possibility given the kind of animal humans are.

    Attempts to bring it into existence in reality may end up more like a kind of universal despotism and mouse utopia, where conditions are so mismatched for normal human reproduction that large parts of the human population dies away through sterility, illness and evolutionarily aberrant behaviour. Good for the perpetuation of the genes of the survivors though?


    We are probably not capable of destroying our own species in a war yet but, as time progresses, I see no reason why we won’t reach that capability so learning to avoid wars between nations, tribes and religious or political groups is more than just preventing the senseless massacres that we have experienced throughout history, it’s a necessary condition for the ultimate preservation of our species.
     
    This is part of the argument for things like archaeofuturism; the Enlightenment state ceases to represent 'the externalisation of mankind's reason' or the instrument of infinite Progress ('God standing on earth') and becomes a major threat in itself.

    Replies: @Beckow, @Mikel

    …Understanding human evolution raises questions about how plausible the advent of this universal state of pacification is. Possibly it is not even a possibility given the kind of animal humans are.

    Only some are animals. Even if we add up all the players who got us to this point in Ukraine – on all sides – they would amount to few tens of thousands. Most people naturally didn’t care, and still don’t care.

    My bias is to blame those who moved first – the fire-breathing chicken hawks dreaming about defeating Russia. Maybe for resources, maybe some belated revenge, maybe because it is there. It is unquestionable that all the initial moves: bombing Serbia, Iraq, Syria,…Maidan, Ukraine in Nato and “screw the Russians living in Ukraine”, were made by the West.

    We can endlessly discuss whether the reaction by Russia was right or not, I fail to see much of a choice they had. Then we get all hot under the collar about morality and rules, etc…the reality is simply that wars are not a good context for conscience or playing nice.

    Yeah, there was no possibility of that universal state – because the morons running the Western security establishment were never in that state. That was a prerequisite.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @Beckow

    dislodging Russia allies like the Serbs from the Danube seem like the opening chess moves to doing what's being done in Kerch and Donbass.

  447. @Philip Owen
    @Mr. Hack

    I haven't seen details for 5 years on the practical maintenance of electric cars but there was an article in IEEE Spectrum around that time which suggested that maintenance was, on the young fleet at the time, dramatically less. The key item of wear is of course the battery. I haven't looked but it seems to me that there is an insurance opportunity to pay monthly against future battery replacement costs.

    The particular article was enthusiastic about the passing of private cars as the economic case favoured near continuous running over a long life for electrics. (Very little dependency on mileage other than battery). So self driving taxis were suggested as the best economic option for the future of automobiles.

    I am part of the murder team for the smallo autorepair shop as I enabled technology transfer from the European Space Agency of satellite signal and power bus technology into the Bordnetz standard later upgraded for electric vehicles and lithium ion battery management systems (which is why Airbus cockpits don't have battery fires, just like space craft).

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    The key item of wear is of course the battery.

    Do you know whether the lifespan of batteries has gone up substantially over say the last 10 years or not? For obvious reasons, I find the idea of having to purchase some kind of monthly insurance to replace a battery ahead of time a financial hassle that I don’t want to have any part of . I would think that many current owners of such vehicles probably dump these cars just before the batteries die off. I wonder how this is handled in the secondary used car market? The distributorships must be able to replace the batteries in a costly manner and keep the retail prices down?…

    • Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Mr. Hack

    You know how it's a hassle keeping your phone charged?

    Multiply by 700 for a car. All those happy EV owners are a mystery. For a company fleet where you have people whose job is managing charging it is merely a cost of doing business. For a personal vehicle it is one more job you don't get any payment for doing.

    Don't you already have plenty of jobs you have to do where you don't get paid?

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @Barbarossa

    , @Barbarossa
    @Mr. Hack

    I think that Philip Owen is correct and the batteries are the biggest maintenance item. They are a pricey one and are thousands of dollars. I think a Tesla battery is like 20K out of pocket. Other components in electric cars like electric motors have very high levels of reliability, so that helps with overall maintenance costs. However, when those batteries go it's a massive cost all at once. It seems that they are focusing on making "lifetime" batteries that never need replacement rather than a cheaper replacement aftermarket.

    I'm in the salt belt here and corrosion plays havoc with wiring and sensors on more advanced IC vehicles already, so I expect that electric cars will suffer notable corrosion issues too. That's one of the many reasons that I run older stuff; they have less corrosion failures.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    , @Philip Owen
    @Mr. Hack

    Lifetime isn't best measured in years which is why you will see claims of 10-20 years, a wide spread. You will also see claims of 100,000 to 200,000 miles. End of life is 70% of capacity. By this time, ability to cope with extreme temperatures, especially cold, will be in decline as will range and acceleration. The warranties offered are more like 8 years and 100,000 miles. Rapid acceleration, driving quickly will deteriorate the battery. Charging cycles are the key measure of battery life. These are measured in hundreds of cycles. Exactly how many is a closely guarded secret for each manufacturer. I am not optimistic of huge strides in new battery capability. Cost is another thing.

    Many new battery companies and lithium mines are being launched. Competition should start reducing the price over the next 8 years. There is a catch. Raw materials will be in short supply and until large new mines for copper, manganese (mostly Ukraine and Georgia by the way), and graphite are competeing with each other, the miners will control the value chain.

    My 18 year Ford Mondeo 2.4 l diesel has never run better with 150,000 on the clock. 48.5 miles per UK gallon in real use (58.2/US - it's already too late at night to compute l/100km). It is good for 240,000 miles if I am careful with the bodywork and corrosion management. My brother's Kia hybrid has almost zero fuel costs with his use patterns but requires the maintenance of an internal combustion engine and the battery replacement of an electric vehicle at about 100,000 miles. As a sometime cofounder of Friends of the Earth in the UK I think hanging on to my diesel until it dies is the greenest option. I walk or cycle locally. I use the car for long trips I can't do by train. Long trips with a warm engine reduce the particle emission problem to insignificance. Replacing the vehicle will do more harm.

    Opinions may vary.

    Replies: @Philip Owen

  448. @Beckow
    @Bashibuzuk


    ...As usual, Poland might end up punching above their weight. It has happened before and we know how it usually ends when it happens.
     
    When you punch above your weight you have to go dirty. So far only in rhetoric, e.g. the constant lying, but as it escalates it will get really dirty.

    When you fight dirty, you must win - Poles know that story better than anyone. They were promised full backing, but that happened before. Full backing is never quite as full when fighting Russia. I wish the misguided Lachs all the luck they can muster, but this will be an uphill fight. They will almost certainly come out of it worse off. Then they will make sad movies and write tear-jerk poems.

    The plans by all sides no longer matter: people plan and then reality happens. None of it is going to unfold the way any of the sides have planned - this is for all marbles and nobody will be willing to lose face. We may make it through, or not, but the nostalgia for how it was before the mad men decided that Nato in Ukraine and Russians out of there is a great idea will be the overwhelming consensus.

    They all look so freaking calm, maybe they know that there is no way to stop this, so why get too emotional?

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @Wokechoke

    They all look so freaking calm, maybe they know that there is no way to stop this, so why get too emotional?

    Unfortunately, for most Americans the war in Ukraine has become not much more than a certain segment within the national news in the evening, usually about half way through the program, very sympathetic towards Ukraine and critical of Russia. Judging by the responses of Europeans like yourself and German_Reader that live much closer to the theater of action, directly receiving more refugees from this war, the interest level is much higher.

    • Replies: @Bashibuzuk
    @Mr. Hack

    Without a notable escalation, this war could drag on for years, depleting human and material ressources until something gives in Ukiestan or RusFed.

    My understanding was that Pynya would use tactical nukes if being defeated, but after his appeasing speech at the Valdaï Club last week, I think the fighting would just go on with the portions of mobiks going through the meat grinder in the coming months.

    Ukies could take Kherson or not, Ruskies might move against northern Ukraine from Belarus with the assistance of their Belarusian allies, but neither side will decisively change the situation on the frontline.

    That is why Poland arming itself to the teeth (even requesting US to park some nukes on its territory), is important. Poland is supposed to complete its military modernization by 2025.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/oct/05/poland-us-nuclear-wars-russia-putin-ukraine

    Pynya's decision about staying or not at the helm of RusFed in 2024 would weaken this Noviop pseudo-Russian state even more. Then possibly the Lyakhs might move in to carve Western Ukraine and Belarus for themselves and consolidate the Intermarium around them.

    By that time, Ukie population would be significantly reduced by war and emigration, while RusFedians would face immense hardships of their own: social, economic and demographic as well. The Поруха of the Eastern Slav would be advanced enough for the external players to move in and collect the spoils. Hundreds of thousands would be dead, Ukiestani economy becoming a shadow of itself, while the reduced RusFedian economy would become an appendix of the neo-imperial China.

    That's the most plausible protracted war scenario, but as Bekow wrote, plans are made and then reality happens.

    Replies: @A123, @Mr. Hack

    , @Beckow
    @Mr. Hack

    We are interested because it is right over the hills, it is interesting, and it puts us in the center again - I suppose a certain narcissistic impulse kicks in. The endless refugees going back and forward make it real on a personal level.

    Our best hope is that the others - like in America - lose interest and the overheated rhetoric calms down. If not, this has no natural stopping point. It will eventually devour everything - at least in this region, but probably could not be contained.

    Accepting that Russians exists, and have certain rights, and that armed Nato-controlled Ukraine is a bridge too far is very hard for true believers like you. You want it all. Well, it cannot be - you hit a wall, now you dream that it is crumbling, but what if it doesn't? The odds are that walls like Russia don't crumble. In my darker moments I think it is too late for a deal - it will be taken to its bloody ends and then regretted forever. And if we get to experience the regrets that will be a happy ending. It could be worse.

  449. @songbird
    Would Hu have been removed, if Biden were thirty years younger?

    Replies: @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    It’s hard to get good read. Hu “Tiger of Lhasa” Jintao probably did have Alzheimer’s. He along with Li and Hu Chunhua are members of the Communist Youth League faction “Tuanpai”. Both “Red Aristocrats” or Princelings (ex Xi himself) and Tuanpai were left off of PSC.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Princelings

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuanpai

    These are the main two factions are analogous the Qing-era Manchu-Mongol aristocrats and Han meritocratic scholar-officials. All the new PSC members came from plebeian background not in the two factions. Which is a pretty bold move for Xi.

    On PRC emigration, it’s not only AUKUS and Europe. There are a million Chinese each in Japan and SK. And I don’t think any Russian males tried to escape the general mobilization to China.

    • Thanks: songbird
  450. @Beckow
    @Coconuts


    ...Understanding human evolution raises questions about how plausible the advent of this universal state of pacification is. Possibly it is not even a possibility given the kind of animal humans are.
     
    Only some are animals. Even if we add up all the players who got us to this point in Ukraine - on all sides - they would amount to few tens of thousands. Most people naturally didn't care, and still don't care.

    My bias is to blame those who moved first - the fire-breathing chicken hawks dreaming about defeating Russia. Maybe for resources, maybe some belated revenge, maybe because it is there. It is unquestionable that all the initial moves: bombing Serbia, Iraq, Syria,...Maidan, Ukraine in Nato and "screw the Russians living in Ukraine", were made by the West.

    We can endlessly discuss whether the reaction by Russia was right or not, I fail to see much of a choice they had. Then we get all hot under the collar about morality and rules, etc...the reality is simply that wars are not a good context for conscience or playing nice.

    Yeah, there was no possibility of that universal state - because the morons running the Western security establishment were never in that state. That was a prerequisite.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    dislodging Russia allies like the Serbs from the Danube seem like the opening chess moves to doing what’s being done in Kerch and Donbass.

  451. @Beckow
    @Bashibuzuk


    ...As usual, Poland might end up punching above their weight. It has happened before and we know how it usually ends when it happens.
     
    When you punch above your weight you have to go dirty. So far only in rhetoric, e.g. the constant lying, but as it escalates it will get really dirty.

    When you fight dirty, you must win - Poles know that story better than anyone. They were promised full backing, but that happened before. Full backing is never quite as full when fighting Russia. I wish the misguided Lachs all the luck they can muster, but this will be an uphill fight. They will almost certainly come out of it worse off. Then they will make sad movies and write tear-jerk poems.

    The plans by all sides no longer matter: people plan and then reality happens. None of it is going to unfold the way any of the sides have planned - this is for all marbles and nobody will be willing to lose face. We may make it through, or not, but the nostalgia for how it was before the mad men decided that Nato in Ukraine and Russians out of there is a great idea will be the overwhelming consensus.

    They all look so freaking calm, maybe they know that there is no way to stop this, so why get too emotional?

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @Wokechoke

    Napoleon’s Cavalry were almost all Polish. They bit it in Borodino/Moscow. Wellington got a dose of them at Waterloo as well. Metternich did nothing wrong.

  452. @Bashibuzuk
    @LatW

    https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2022/09/poland-will-have-a-large-and-modern-tank-army.html

    Poland is preparing to fight RusFed in the Baltics and Ukraine. Poland intends to become the focal point for the assembly of the Intermarium.

    The Intermarium is put in place to prevent the economic connectivity between Old Europe (France, Italy, Germany...) and China through the territories currently controlled, or in the case of Belarus, influenced by the RusFed.

    Old Europe is being sacrificed by the Atlanticist branch of the Globalist to prevent the appearance of the Eurasian economic and military superpower in which China and Old Europe would be the major stakeholders, with RusFed, Iran and Turkey being the minor ones.

    Poland is gambling to become an additional major stakeholder in this geopolitical situation that will define the first half of the twenty-first century in Eurasia. It plays the role of the Atlanticist redoubt in Europe (Fort Trump for G-d's sake...)

    Poland is playing its hand as usual, in a somewhat demonstrative manner. They could have ordered their main battle tanks and other military upgrades in Old Europe, but they didn't. By choosing to proceed that way they (over ?) emphasize their independence and what they see as their growing clout in the Eurasian affairs.

    As usual, Poland might end up punching above their weight. It has happened before and we know how it usually ends when it happens. Old Europe will not go gentle into that good night, it might well push Poland towards a direct confrontational with the RusFed in Ukraine, Belarus and the Baltics, and then backstab it when the going gets tough.

    https://www.thenationalnews.com/world/europe/2022/10/13/france-wont-retaliate-with-nuclear-weapons-if-russia-uses-them-in-ukraine/

    That would be some burden sharing all right: Poland and the Baltics would shoulder the burden, fall when backstabbed, and do some sharing with Germany clawing its lost historical territories back.

    Then OBOR would go through RusFed, Belarus and the German Baltic territories (including Königsberg) with the Nord Stream pipelines magically spirited back to life.

    That would allow for the birth of Eurasia from Dublin to Vladivostok with Han Chinese characteristics. China and Old Europe would have won this round of the Great Game 2.0.

    https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3197667/german-chancellor-olaf-scholz-visit-china-next-week

    https://ic.pics.livejournal.com/fon_eichwald/43081844/57393/57393_640.jpg

    Expectations...

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/aa/Poland_can_into_Wikipedia.jpg

    Reality... ?

    🙂

    Replies: @Beckow, @Mr. Hack, @Wokechoke, @AP, @LatW

    Poland is preparing to fight RusFed in the Baltics and Ukraine. Poland intends to become the focal point for the assembly of the Intermarium.

    But wouldn’t such actions rub up against strict NATO prohibitions to not take such direct involvement within this war? Or do you also think that all of NATO will soon support a more active involvement in this war? I don’t think that Poland will be bold enough (or perhaps foolish enough?) to sever its relations with NATO in order to pursue some sort of “Intermarum” realignment of Europe’s map?..I’ve always just thought of this topic as some sort of personal pet project that AP was supporting, and now find out that it has even more prominent teeth. 🙂

    https://neweasterneurope.eu/2018/09/25/ukrainian-far-right-become-one-biggest-proponents-intermarium/

    • Replies: @Bashibuzuk
    @Mr. Hack

    A NATO country could fight its own wars and military interventions. Turkey for example is active in Syrak and Libya. NATO does not get involved in such situations. Poland might do it on their own or most likely as the central force in a coalition with the Baltic states under Anglo-saxon supervision.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

  453. @Bashibuzuk
    @LatW

    https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2022/09/poland-will-have-a-large-and-modern-tank-army.html

    Poland is preparing to fight RusFed in the Baltics and Ukraine. Poland intends to become the focal point for the assembly of the Intermarium.

    The Intermarium is put in place to prevent the economic connectivity between Old Europe (France, Italy, Germany...) and China through the territories currently controlled, or in the case of Belarus, influenced by the RusFed.

    Old Europe is being sacrificed by the Atlanticist branch of the Globalist to prevent the appearance of the Eurasian economic and military superpower in which China and Old Europe would be the major stakeholders, with RusFed, Iran and Turkey being the minor ones.

    Poland is gambling to become an additional major stakeholder in this geopolitical situation that will define the first half of the twenty-first century in Eurasia. It plays the role of the Atlanticist redoubt in Europe (Fort Trump for G-d's sake...)

    Poland is playing its hand as usual, in a somewhat demonstrative manner. They could have ordered their main battle tanks and other military upgrades in Old Europe, but they didn't. By choosing to proceed that way they (over ?) emphasize their independence and what they see as their growing clout in the Eurasian affairs.

    As usual, Poland might end up punching above their weight. It has happened before and we know how it usually ends when it happens. Old Europe will not go gentle into that good night, it might well push Poland towards a direct confrontational with the RusFed in Ukraine, Belarus and the Baltics, and then backstab it when the going gets tough.

    https://www.thenationalnews.com/world/europe/2022/10/13/france-wont-retaliate-with-nuclear-weapons-if-russia-uses-them-in-ukraine/

    That would be some burden sharing all right: Poland and the Baltics would shoulder the burden, fall when backstabbed, and do some sharing with Germany clawing its lost historical territories back.

    Then OBOR would go through RusFed, Belarus and the German Baltic territories (including Königsberg) with the Nord Stream pipelines magically spirited back to life.

    That would allow for the birth of Eurasia from Dublin to Vladivostok with Han Chinese characteristics. China and Old Europe would have won this round of the Great Game 2.0.

    https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3197667/german-chancellor-olaf-scholz-visit-china-next-week

    https://ic.pics.livejournal.com/fon_eichwald/43081844/57393/57393_640.jpg

    Expectations...

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/aa/Poland_can_into_Wikipedia.jpg

    Reality... ?

    🙂

    Replies: @Beckow, @Mr. Hack, @Wokechoke, @AP, @LatW

    When the Prussians and Austrians fought for supremacy, Poles hedged their bets and fought on both sides slightly favouring Berlin. Fair enough you say, but as soon as Prussia was on the losing side against the British the Poles switch to loyal Anglo-Saxon-American alignment. Jackals really.

    • Replies: @Bashibuzuk
    @Wokechoke

    Churchill called Poland "the hyena of Europe" for a reason.

    https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=956148

  454. @silviosilver
    @Mikel


    Well, I don’t know, it depends. It’s a far-fetched hypothetical. Two thoughts that come to mind is that it’s a much better alternative than a world where cockroaches and rats are the dominant species and that I can definitely feel much more compassion and afinity towards Africans than towards any non-human species.
     
    Fair enough. Feel free to tell me to fuck off if you find the topic distasteful, but I have an even farther-fetched hypothetical for you, the purpose of which isn't to "put you on the spot," but to provoke consideration about what is truly important in life. If you don't want to answer and don't want to tell me to fuck off, that's fine; I'll be happy if you just give it some thought.

    There is a comet hurtling towards the earth and you are faced with the following choice: you can either save your own race but the rest of humanity dies or you can save the rest of humanity but your own race dies. I know it's inconceivable that such a scenario could ever arise, but be a sport and play along eh? Which do you choose? For me the answer is obvious and I would give it unhesitatingly. (I don't mean to sound like I think I'm "better" than someone who would have to think about it; I'm saying it that way to report that I've thought about this sort of thing enough that I have a very good idea of where I stand.)

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Mikel, @Mikel, @Barbarossa

    Did you enjoy Mein Kampf?

    : )

    I have often wondered since I first read it why nobody ever makes any mention of the thing in the project new american century pearl harbor writeup about genetic race targeted bio-weapons. I swear you could terrorize jews just talking about them even though such weapons never have and quite probably will never exist. They seem to like terrorizing themselves like that.

    • Replies: @silviosilver
    @Emil Nikola Richard


    Did you enjoy Mein Kampf?
     
    So should I take it you'd sacrifice your kind to save the rest from the comet? Mighty white of you, son.

    Or was it just that I came up with the thought experiment at all that freaked you out?
    , @silviosilver
    @Emil Nikola Richard


    Did you enjoy Mein Kampf?
     
    On a more serious note - : ) - I've been talking race for a while now, but you reckon if I really started kampfing hard - not just shitposting, but really got my kampf on - I could make chancellor by 2033? There would be a kind of romance to it, doncha think? Course, nazis both then and now would puke at my association with their sacred cause, but hey, life is full of surprises.

    : )

  455. France renewing and expanding its fleet, Sweden building new and considering reopening old, Germany extending a bit for now at least, Poland building its first – great autumn for EU nuclear news:

    OCT 28, 2022. The Polish government has chosen the United States as its international partner for the construction of Poland’s first nuclear power station. France and South Korea had also hoped to win the contract – though the door appears to remain open for them to be involved in developing a second plant.

    Construction is planned to begin in 2026, with the first reactor going online as early as 2033. The government aims to have a further three reactors at another location inland. All six are planned to be up and running by 2043, with a total installed capacity of 6 to 9 GW.

    By comparison, Poland currently has around 33 GW of installed coal-fired power, which produces 70% of it the country’s electricity. The government is hoping to progressively cut that latter figure through the development of nuclear and renewables.

    It remains, unclear, however, whether Westinghouse will build all six of Poland’s planned reactors at both locations or just the first three, with the potential for another international partner at the second site.

    Polish government spokesman Piotr Müller told the Polish Press Agency (PAP) today that: “The Americans will build the first nuclear power plant. We are also discussing possible projects with our other partner countries.”

    That appears to leave the door open for France’s EDF and South Korea’s KHNP, which have also submitted offers to build Poland’s nuclear plants, to be chosen to develop the second site.

    https://notesfrompoland.com/2022/10/28/poland-picks-us-as-partner-for-first-nuclear-power-plant/

    • Replies: @YetAnotherAnon
    @sudden death

    I'm impressed. The United States destroy Europe's cheap energy pipeline, and Europe pays a US private equity company for their nukes. It's a win-win (for the US)!

    I wonder what the costs are and what the tech will be. Westinghouse famously went bust due to cost overruns on the AP1000 reactor design, the technology of which is now owned by China, which has the only operating AP1000s in the world.

    Rosatom is building a 6Gw plant in Turkey for $22 billion.

    Replies: @sudden death, @A123

  456. @Mr. Hack
    @Philip Owen


    The key item of wear is of course the battery.
     
    Do you know whether the lifespan of batteries has gone up substantially over say the last 10 years or not? For obvious reasons, I find the idea of having to purchase some kind of monthly insurance to replace a battery ahead of time a financial hassle that I don't want to have any part of . I would think that many current owners of such vehicles probably dump these cars just before the batteries die off. I wonder how this is handled in the secondary used car market? The distributorships must be able to replace the batteries in a costly manner and keep the retail prices down?...

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Barbarossa, @Philip Owen

    You know how it’s a hassle keeping your phone charged?

    Multiply by 700 for a car. All those happy EV owners are a mystery. For a company fleet where you have people whose job is managing charging it is merely a cost of doing business. For a personal vehicle it is one more job you don’t get any payment for doing.

    Don’t you already have plenty of jobs you have to do where you don’t get paid?

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @Emil Nikola Richard


    You know how it’s a hassle keeping your phone charged?
     
    I get your point. However my brand new Samsung flip4 holds a charge much netter than my old one did that I had for about 10 years (!) previously. I can go almost three days before I need to recharge it! Great little phone, however, I get your point!
    , @Barbarossa
    @Emil Nikola Richard

    Although, you have to admit that sometimes having to fill up at the gas station is a pain too.

    One effect that phasing in EVs will have will be a diminishing of local government revenue that comes from sales tax and fuel taxes on IC vehicle consumption. That may not seem to be a big deal in some areas, but for an area like mine will actually hurt. I don't know if this has been considered at all.

    Replies: @Sher Singh

  457. Bashibuzuk says:
    @Mr. Hack
    @Beckow


    They all look so freaking calm, maybe they know that there is no way to stop this, so why get too emotional?
     
    Unfortunately, for most Americans the war in Ukraine has become not much more than a certain segment within the national news in the evening, usually about half way through the program, very sympathetic towards Ukraine and critical of Russia. Judging by the responses of Europeans like yourself and German_Reader that live much closer to the theater of action, directly receiving more refugees from this war, the interest level is much higher.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk, @Beckow

    Without a notable escalation, this war could drag on for years, depleting human and material ressources until something gives in Ukiestan or RusFed.

    My understanding was that Pynya would use tactical nukes if being defeated, but after his appeasing speech at the Valdaï Club last week, I think the fighting would just go on with the portions of mobiks going through the meat grinder in the coming months.

    Ukies could take Kherson or not, Ruskies might move against northern Ukraine from Belarus with the assistance of their Belarusian allies, but neither side will decisively change the situation on the frontline.

    That is why Poland arming itself to the teeth (even requesting US to park some nukes on its territory), is important. Poland is supposed to complete its military modernization by 2025.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/oct/05/poland-us-nuclear-wars-russia-putin-ukraine

    Pynya’s decision about staying or not at the helm of RusFed in 2024 would weaken this Noviop pseudo-Russian state even more. Then possibly the Lyakhs might move in to carve Western Ukraine and Belarus for themselves and consolidate the Intermarium around them.

    By that time, Ukie population would be significantly reduced by war and emigration, while RusFedians would face immense hardships of their own: social, economic and demographic as well. The Поруха of the Eastern Slav would be advanced enough for the external players to move in and collect the spoils. Hundreds of thousands would be dead, Ukiestani economy becoming a shadow of itself, while the reduced RusFedian economy would become an appendix of the neo-imperial China.

    That’s the most plausible protracted war scenario, but as Bekow wrote, plans are made and then reality happens.

    • Replies: @A123
    @Bashibuzuk


    Without a notable escalation, this war could drag on for years, depleting human and material resources until something gives in Ukiestan or RusFed.
     
    By the middle of next year, the story will be Populist (including MAGA) de-escalation. While the "top line" verbiage may not change, recent & upcoming elections will massively reduce funding from:
        • Italy
        • UK
        • U.S.

    The impending return of Netanyahu will block Zelensky's attempt to pull Israel into the conflict.
    ___

    Germany has become so unreliable as an arms manufacturer, Poland is bolstering its own defense with South Korean imports. Heavy industry in Germany is collapsing and "failure to deliver" risk is intolerably high.

    Never place an order with a supplier unlikely to fulfill it.

    That Germany has become incapable of military production is directly tied to Green Party follies.
    ___

    How hard will winter be on EU nations, notably France and Germany, that are totally committed to Ukie-stan?

    It appears that Scholz and Macron massively screwed up by instigating the Ukraine conflict. They need to make up the shortfall created by the MAGA knee capping of their White House puppet. However, it is hard to see how Germany can commit to gigantic gifting of military hardware (assuming they can actually make it) after crushing their own economy with Green Party fanaticism.

    Will France and Germany also have to reduce cash support for Kiev aggression to head off domestic unrest?
    ___

    The smart move for the Kiev regime would be seeking an armistice now. If they do not, Ukie-stan will be forced into one 8-12 months from now on much worse terms.

    PEACE 😇
    , @Mr. Hack
    @Bashibuzuk


    while RusFedians would face immense hardships of their own: social, economic and demographic as well.
     
    It's coming sooner than what you may think. One of Russia's main economists, Vladislav Inozemtsev, recently put out this damning report. I actually can't believe that his report (or Inozemtsev himself) wasn't buried somewhere. Please watch this clip and let me know what you think. Very interesting.

    https://youtu.be/QMRn7jx7JqA

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk, @QCIC, @Mike_from_Russia

  458. Instead of a midterm “Red Wave”, could we reach “Scarlet Tsunami” status?

    The only poll aggregation showing Democrat success are from the notoriously poor 538 site. Even Dems are not buying into that propaganda: (1)

    Nate Silver of 538 gives Democrat Governor Kathy Hochul a 97% chance of re-election. That makes sense. ‘Tis a Democrat state south of the thruway and in many parts north.

    Real Clear Politics moved the race to a tossup two weeks ago.

    Who is right? I will let the Democrats decide. The New York Times reported:

    With just 12 days until Election Day, Democrats and their allies are mounting a frenzied push to keep Ms. Hochul in office, pouring millions of dollars into last-minute ads and staging a whirlwind of campaign rallies to energize their base amid concerns that their typically reliable bedrock of Black and Latino voters might not turn out.

    Leftoids are diverting resources from other races to save a NEW YORK election. OMG! That is not a mere admission of weakness, it is nigh unto blind panic.
    ____

    Turnout is driven by the belief that victory is possible. And, crushing burns delivered at the top of the ticket are demolishing that illusion. (2)

      

    SJW’s cowering in their basements rather than voting could yield unexpected MAGA gains in “down ballot” races. Given the DNC’s addiction to ballot fraud, winning seats related to election integrity will have huge 2024 implications.
    ___

    Attempts to corrupt Pennsylvania (3) and Georgia elections are once again in play.

    1. Delayed Election Results
    Acting Secretary of State Leigh Chapman is already warning voters to not expect results on election night, as it might take “days” to finalize as officials cannot begin processing mail-in ballots until Election Day. Already more than 1 million Pennsylvania voters have applied to vote by mail, with the majority of requests coming from Democrats.

    4. Duplicate Voting
    Philadelphia election officials are set to remove a key safeguard for catching duplicate votes as Election Day approaches. The procedure is known as poll book reconciliation, whereby election officials compare mail-in ballots with poll book records from Election Day. If a person is listed as voting in person on Election Day via the poll book, but the city also receives a mail-in ballot for that voter, the city will not count the mail-in ballot so as to protect against double-voting.

    But now the Philadelphia City Commission is threatening to stop the practice because officials claim it will jeopardize their access to state funds. Newly-enacted Act 88, passed by the Republican-majority legislature, prohibits the vote count (after starting at 7 a.m. on Election Day) from stopping until all ballots are tabulated. Philadelphia election officials argue that because poll book reconciliation requires pausing the vote count, they’re at risk of violating Act 88 and will subsequently lose state funding. Such a narrow interpretation of Act 88 is a weak excuse for lessening election security measures. As such, government watchdog Restoring Integrity and Trust in Elections (RITE) has filed a lawsuit against the Philadelphia City Commission.

    also

    2. Counting Undated Ballots
    3. 240,000 Unverified Ballots
    5. Poll Watcher Instructions Violate Pennsylvania Law

    It feels like the DNC is trying to permanently destroy belief in democracy. That cannot end well for them, yet they do it anyway.

    #LetsGoBrandon 😇
    __________

    (1) https://donsurber.blogspot.com/2022/10/dems-listen-to-rcp-not-538.html

    (2) https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2022/10/28/kari-lake-a-wolverine-spirit-animal/

    (3) https://thefederalist.com/2022/10/28/watch-for-these-5-red-flags-in-pennsylvanias-elections-this-year/

  459. @Emil Nikola Richard
    @silviosilver

    Did you enjoy Mein Kampf?

    : )

    I have often wondered since I first read it why nobody ever makes any mention of the thing in the project new american century pearl harbor writeup about genetic race targeted bio-weapons. I swear you could terrorize jews just talking about them even though such weapons never have and quite probably will never exist. They seem to like terrorizing themselves like that.

    Replies: @silviosilver, @silviosilver

    Did you enjoy Mein Kampf?

    So should I take it you’d sacrifice your kind to save the rest from the comet? Mighty white of you, son.

    Or was it just that I came up with the thought experiment at all that freaked you out?

  460. Bashibuzuk says:
    @Mr. Hack
    @Bashibuzuk


    Poland is preparing to fight RusFed in the Baltics and Ukraine. Poland intends to become the focal point for the assembly of the Intermarium.
     
    But wouldn't such actions rub up against strict NATO prohibitions to not take such direct involvement within this war? Or do you also think that all of NATO will soon support a more active involvement in this war? I don't think that Poland will be bold enough (or perhaps foolish enough?) to sever its relations with NATO in order to pursue some sort of "Intermarum" realignment of Europe's map?..I've always just thought of this topic as some sort of personal pet project that AP was supporting, and now find out that it has even more prominent teeth. :-)

    https://neweasterneurope.eu/new_site/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Ska%CC%88rmavbild-2018-08-14-kl.-23.06.19.png
    https://neweasterneurope.eu/2018/09/25/ukrainian-far-right-become-one-biggest-proponents-intermarium/

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

    A NATO country could fight its own wars and military interventions. Turkey for example is active in Syrak and Libya. NATO does not get involved in such situations. Poland might do it on their own or most likely as the central force in a coalition with the Baltic states under Anglo-saxon supervision.

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @Bashibuzuk


    A NATO country could fight its own wars and military interventions. Turkey for example is active in Syrak and Libya.
     
    It sounds like a NATO country could be involved in an offensive war that it starts, without consulting other member countries, and proceed, unless the country being attacked decides to retaliate and attack the original aggressor party on its home turf? Everyone knows that any NATO country attacked is to be supported by all of the other NATO countries. Not a bad deal?...

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

  461. @Emil Nikola Richard
    @silviosilver

    Did you enjoy Mein Kampf?

    : )

    I have often wondered since I first read it why nobody ever makes any mention of the thing in the project new american century pearl harbor writeup about genetic race targeted bio-weapons. I swear you could terrorize jews just talking about them even though such weapons never have and quite probably will never exist. They seem to like terrorizing themselves like that.

    Replies: @silviosilver, @silviosilver

    Did you enjoy Mein Kampf?

    On a more serious note – : ) – I’ve been talking race for a while now, but you reckon if I really started kampfing hard – not just shitposting, but really got my kampf on – I could make chancellor by 2033? There would be a kind of romance to it, doncha think? Course, nazis both then and now would puke at my association with their sacred cause, but hey, life is full of surprises.

    : )

  462. @Wokechoke
    @Bashibuzuk

    When the Prussians and Austrians fought for supremacy, Poles hedged their bets and fought on both sides slightly favouring Berlin. Fair enough you say, but as soon as Prussia was on the losing side against the British the Poles switch to loyal Anglo-Saxon-American alignment. Jackals really.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

    Churchill called Poland “the hyena of Europe” for a reason.

    https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=956148

  463. @sudden death
    France renewing and expanding its fleet, Sweden building new and considering reopening old, Germany extending a bit for now at least, Poland building its first - great autumn for EU nuclear news:

    OCT 28, 2022. The Polish government has chosen the United States as its international partner for the construction of Poland’s first nuclear power station. France and South Korea had also hoped to win the contract – though the door appears to remain open for them to be involved in developing a second plant.

    Construction is planned to begin in 2026, with the first reactor going online as early as 2033. The government aims to have a further three reactors at another location inland. All six are planned to be up and running by 2043, with a total installed capacity of 6 to 9 GW.

    By comparison, Poland currently has around 33 GW of installed coal-fired power, which produces 70% of it the country’s electricity. The government is hoping to progressively cut that latter figure through the development of nuclear and renewables.

    It remains, unclear, however, whether Westinghouse will build all six of Poland’s planned reactors at both locations or just the first three, with the potential for another international partner at the second site.

    Polish government spokesman Piotr Müller told the Polish Press Agency (PAP) today that: “The Americans will build the first nuclear power plant. We are also discussing possible projects with our other partner countries.”

    That appears to leave the door open for France’s EDF and South Korea’s KHNP, which have also submitted offers to build Poland’s nuclear plants, to be chosen to develop the second site.
     

    https://notesfrompoland.com/2022/10/28/poland-picks-us-as-partner-for-first-nuclear-power-plant/

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon

    I’m impressed. The United States destroy Europe’s cheap energy pipeline, and Europe pays a US private equity company for their nukes. It’s a win-win (for the US)!

    I wonder what the costs are and what the tech will be. Westinghouse famously went bust due to cost overruns on the AP1000 reactor design, the technology of which is now owned by China, which has the only operating AP1000s in the world.

    Rosatom is building a 6Gw plant in Turkey for $22 billion.

    • Replies: @sudden death
    @YetAnotherAnon

    Poland never had getting much of that so called "cheap gas" and natgas pipeline there is fully intact to this day, just Moscow refuses to deliver gas through it into Germany.

    However, is it really that impressive when RF itself pays nearly all the cost of nuclear plant for Turks, whom shot down both RF envoy and a fighter jet, keep supplying UA army and recognizing Crimea as Ukrainian land, also help to earn UA money for the grain, lol


    A Russian state-owned company signed a $9.1bn loan deal with Gazprombank in August to fund the construction and development of Turkey's Akkuyu nuclear power plant, according to the official documents.

    Bloomberg reported last month that Rosatom had decided to wire $15bn to Turkey for the construction of the $20bn Akkuyu nuclear power plant, citing officials who said that an initial $5bn had already been received.

    The officials suggested the move was a goodwill gesture by Russian President Vladimir Putin to thank Turkey for the breakthrough Ukraine grain deal brokered by Ankara in July.

    The Turkish central bank’s gross reserves increased by $7.4bn during the week ending on 5 August, the biggest increase in 12 months, according to data from the monetary authority. That is the same date Gazprombank signed the deal with Akkuyu.
     

    https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/russia-turkey-gazprombank-akkuyu-plant-loan-fund

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk, @A123

    , @A123
    @YetAnotherAnon


    the AP1000 reactor design, the technology of which is now owned by China,
     
    Do you have a citation to back up that wild claim?

    What actually happened is: (1)

    Westinghouse Electric Company has emerged from Chapter 11 bankruptcy as a reorganised company after the completion yesterday of its sale by parent company Toshiba of Japan.

    Westinghouse, which supplies nuclear plant products and technologies, has been sold to Brookfield WEC Holdings, a subsidiary of Brookfield, the Canadian-listed asset management company that in January 2018 agreed to buy Westinghouse from Toshiba for $4.6bn.
     
    There is no sign of Chinese technology ownership.

    Delve slightly further, and you will find that American regulators were unwilling to allow the IP to move cross border. While the parent is up north, Brookfield WEC Holdings is located in Cranberry Township, PA.

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://www.nucnet.org/news/westinghouse-emerges-from-bankruptcy-after-completion-of-sale-to-brookfield

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon

  464. @Bashibuzuk
    @Mr. Hack

    Without a notable escalation, this war could drag on for years, depleting human and material ressources until something gives in Ukiestan or RusFed.

    My understanding was that Pynya would use tactical nukes if being defeated, but after his appeasing speech at the Valdaï Club last week, I think the fighting would just go on with the portions of mobiks going through the meat grinder in the coming months.

    Ukies could take Kherson or not, Ruskies might move against northern Ukraine from Belarus with the assistance of their Belarusian allies, but neither side will decisively change the situation on the frontline.

    That is why Poland arming itself to the teeth (even requesting US to park some nukes on its territory), is important. Poland is supposed to complete its military modernization by 2025.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/oct/05/poland-us-nuclear-wars-russia-putin-ukraine

    Pynya's decision about staying or not at the helm of RusFed in 2024 would weaken this Noviop pseudo-Russian state even more. Then possibly the Lyakhs might move in to carve Western Ukraine and Belarus for themselves and consolidate the Intermarium around them.

    By that time, Ukie population would be significantly reduced by war and emigration, while RusFedians would face immense hardships of their own: social, economic and demographic as well. The Поруха of the Eastern Slav would be advanced enough for the external players to move in and collect the spoils. Hundreds of thousands would be dead, Ukiestani economy becoming a shadow of itself, while the reduced RusFedian economy would become an appendix of the neo-imperial China.

    That's the most plausible protracted war scenario, but as Bekow wrote, plans are made and then reality happens.

    Replies: @A123, @Mr. Hack

    Without a notable escalation, this war could drag on for years, depleting human and material resources until something gives in Ukiestan or RusFed.

    By the middle of next year, the story will be Populist (including MAGA) de-escalation. While the “top line” verbiage may not change, recent & upcoming elections will massively reduce funding from:
        • Italy
        • UK
        • U.S.

    The impending return of Netanyahu will block Zelensky’s attempt to pull Israel into the conflict.
    ___

    Germany has become so unreliable as an arms manufacturer, Poland is bolstering its own defense with South Korean imports. Heavy industry in Germany is collapsing and “failure to deliver” risk is intolerably high.

    Never place an order with a supplier unlikely to fulfill it.

    That Germany has become incapable of military production is directly tied to Green Party follies.
    ___

    How hard will winter be on EU nations, notably France and Germany, that are totally committed to Ukie-stan?

    It appears that Scholz and Macron massively screwed up by instigating the Ukraine conflict. They need to make up the shortfall created by the MAGA knee capping of their White House puppet. However, it is hard to see how Germany can commit to gigantic gifting of military hardware (assuming they can actually make it) after crushing their own economy with Green Party fanaticism.

    Will France and Germany also have to reduce cash support for Kiev aggression to head off domestic unrest?
    ___

    The smart move for the Kiev regime would be seeking an armistice now. If they do not, Ukie-stan will be forced into one 8-12 months from now on much worse terms.

    PEACE 😇

  465. @YetAnotherAnon
    @sudden death

    I'm impressed. The United States destroy Europe's cheap energy pipeline, and Europe pays a US private equity company for their nukes. It's a win-win (for the US)!

    I wonder what the costs are and what the tech will be. Westinghouse famously went bust due to cost overruns on the AP1000 reactor design, the technology of which is now owned by China, which has the only operating AP1000s in the world.

    Rosatom is building a 6Gw plant in Turkey for $22 billion.

    Replies: @sudden death, @A123

    Poland never had getting much of that so called “cheap gas” and natgas pipeline there is fully intact to this day, just Moscow refuses to deliver gas through it into Germany.

    However, is it really that impressive when RF itself pays nearly all the cost of nuclear plant for Turks, whom shot down both RF envoy and a fighter jet, keep supplying UA army and recognizing Crimea as Ukrainian land, also help to earn UA money for the grain, lol

    A Russian state-owned company signed a $9.1bn loan deal with Gazprombank in August to fund the construction and development of Turkey’s Akkuyu nuclear power plant, according to the official documents.

    Bloomberg reported last month that Rosatom had decided to wire $15bn to Turkey for the construction of the $20bn Akkuyu nuclear power plant, citing officials who said that an initial $5bn had already been received.

    The officials suggested the move was a goodwill gesture by Russian President Vladimir Putin to thank Turkey for the breakthrough Ukraine grain deal brokered by Ankara in July.

    The Turkish central bank’s gross reserves increased by $7.4bn during the week ending on 5 August, the biggest increase in 12 months, according to data from the monetary authority. That is the same date Gazprombank signed the deal with Akkuyu.

    https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/russia-turkey-gazprombank-akkuyu-plant-loan-fund

    • Agree: Bashibuzuk
    • Replies: @Bashibuzuk
    @sudden death

    RusFed has always been a sad joke. Turks make the best of it and they are right.

    Baltic states should have done the same, but got entangled into Atlanticist geopolitical role playing for revanchism reasons. When one witnesses a fight between клоуны & пидорасы (to use Pelevin's aphorism), one does not side up with any of them if one is reasonably smart.

    Otherwise, one ends up being a "a clown servicing faggots or a faggot servicing clowns" (those who read Pelevin would understand). I let it up to you to decide who's who in the current situation.

    🙂

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dx96PPyWoAAqz00.jpg

    https://s9.pikabu.ru/post_img/big/2020/08/23/12/159821448911932479.jpg

    , @A123
    @sudden death


    Poland never had getting much of that so called “cheap gas” and natgas pipeline there is fully intact to this day, just Moscow refuses to deliver gas through it into Germany.
     
    The #1 theory for destruction of the NS pipes remains an accident related to hydrate slugs and pressure relief. What sabotage team would extend an operation over 17 hours? That is highly implausible timing.
    ___

    However, if one insists on a less likely #2 sabotage theory, the top candidate is Poland;)

    • If everything works as planned, Germany's resolve to fight Russia is bolstered.
    • If the politics falls apart, Poland has the pipeline that will generate transit fees and provide leverage over Scholz's EU antics;)

    All the Poles have to do is not be caught;) Given the extreme difficulty of obtaining credible evidence from an undersea event site, there are many option for avoiding blame. The job did not require nation state level expertise or equipment. The easiest would be running the demolition contract through multiple cutouts for execution by a mercenary firm.

    A bit of bonus subterfuge would be the final step in the intelligence operation pretending to be Russian and issuing the contract to Wagner. While an entertaining idea, this would provably be too risky;)

    PEACE 😇

  466. @YetAnotherAnon
    @sudden death

    I'm impressed. The United States destroy Europe's cheap energy pipeline, and Europe pays a US private equity company for their nukes. It's a win-win (for the US)!

    I wonder what the costs are and what the tech will be. Westinghouse famously went bust due to cost overruns on the AP1000 reactor design, the technology of which is now owned by China, which has the only operating AP1000s in the world.

    Rosatom is building a 6Gw plant in Turkey for $22 billion.

    Replies: @sudden death, @A123

    the AP1000 reactor design, the technology of which is now owned by China,

    Do you have a citation to back up that wild claim?

    What actually happened is: (1)

    Westinghouse Electric Company has emerged from Chapter 11 bankruptcy as a reorganised company after the completion yesterday of its sale by parent company Toshiba of Japan.

    Westinghouse, which supplies nuclear plant products and technologies, has been sold to Brookfield WEC Holdings, a subsidiary of Brookfield, the Canadian-listed asset management company that in January 2018 agreed to buy Westinghouse from Toshiba for $4.6bn.

    There is no sign of Chinese technology ownership.

    Delve slightly further, and you will find that American regulators were unwilling to allow the IP to move cross border. While the parent is up north, Brookfield WEC Holdings is located in Cranberry Township, PA.

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://www.nucnet.org/news/westinghouse-emerges-from-bankruptcy-after-completion-of-sale-to-brookfield

    • Replies: @YetAnotherAnon
    @A123

    You are correct, but the Chinese own the IP on the various improvements they are making.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AP1000#Chinese_design_extensions

    Replies: @A123

  467. Bashibuzuk says:
    @sudden death
    @YetAnotherAnon

    Poland never had getting much of that so called "cheap gas" and natgas pipeline there is fully intact to this day, just Moscow refuses to deliver gas through it into Germany.

    However, is it really that impressive when RF itself pays nearly all the cost of nuclear plant for Turks, whom shot down both RF envoy and a fighter jet, keep supplying UA army and recognizing Crimea as Ukrainian land, also help to earn UA money for the grain, lol


    A Russian state-owned company signed a $9.1bn loan deal with Gazprombank in August to fund the construction and development of Turkey's Akkuyu nuclear power plant, according to the official documents.

    Bloomberg reported last month that Rosatom had decided to wire $15bn to Turkey for the construction of the $20bn Akkuyu nuclear power plant, citing officials who said that an initial $5bn had already been received.

    The officials suggested the move was a goodwill gesture by Russian President Vladimir Putin to thank Turkey for the breakthrough Ukraine grain deal brokered by Ankara in July.

    The Turkish central bank’s gross reserves increased by $7.4bn during the week ending on 5 August, the biggest increase in 12 months, according to data from the monetary authority. That is the same date Gazprombank signed the deal with Akkuyu.
     

    https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/russia-turkey-gazprombank-akkuyu-plant-loan-fund

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk, @A123

    RusFed has always been a sad joke. Turks make the best of it and they are right.

    Baltic states should have done the same, but got entangled into Atlanticist geopolitical role playing for revanchism reasons. When one witnesses a fight between клоуны & пидорасы (to use Pelevin’s aphorism), one does not side up with any of them if one is reasonably smart.

    Otherwise, one ends up being a “a clown servicing faggots or a faggot servicing clowns” (those who read Pelevin would understand). I let it up to you to decide who’s who in the current situation.

    🙂

    [MORE]

  468. @sudden death
    @YetAnotherAnon

    Poland never had getting much of that so called "cheap gas" and natgas pipeline there is fully intact to this day, just Moscow refuses to deliver gas through it into Germany.

    However, is it really that impressive when RF itself pays nearly all the cost of nuclear plant for Turks, whom shot down both RF envoy and a fighter jet, keep supplying UA army and recognizing Crimea as Ukrainian land, also help to earn UA money for the grain, lol


    A Russian state-owned company signed a $9.1bn loan deal with Gazprombank in August to fund the construction and development of Turkey's Akkuyu nuclear power plant, according to the official documents.

    Bloomberg reported last month that Rosatom had decided to wire $15bn to Turkey for the construction of the $20bn Akkuyu nuclear power plant, citing officials who said that an initial $5bn had already been received.

    The officials suggested the move was a goodwill gesture by Russian President Vladimir Putin to thank Turkey for the breakthrough Ukraine grain deal brokered by Ankara in July.

    The Turkish central bank’s gross reserves increased by $7.4bn during the week ending on 5 August, the biggest increase in 12 months, according to data from the monetary authority. That is the same date Gazprombank signed the deal with Akkuyu.
     

    https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/russia-turkey-gazprombank-akkuyu-plant-loan-fund

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk, @A123

    Poland never had getting much of that so called “cheap gas” and natgas pipeline there is fully intact to this day, just Moscow refuses to deliver gas through it into Germany.

    The #1 theory for destruction of the NS pipes remains an accident related to hydrate slugs and pressure relief. What sabotage team would extend an operation over 17 hours? That is highly implausible timing.
    ___

    However, if one insists on a less likely #2 sabotage theory, the top candidate is Poland;)

    • If everything works as planned, Germany’s resolve to fight Russia is bolstered.
    • If the politics falls apart, Poland has the pipeline that will generate transit fees and provide leverage over Scholz’s EU antics;)

    All the Poles have to do is not be caught;) Given the extreme difficulty of obtaining credible evidence from an undersea event site, there are many option for avoiding blame. The job did not require nation state level expertise or equipment. The easiest would be running the demolition contract through multiple cutouts for execution by a mercenary firm.

    A bit of bonus subterfuge would be the final step in the intelligence operation pretending to be Russian and issuing the contract to Wagner. While an entertaining idea, this would provably be too risky;)

    PEACE 😇

  469. @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Mr. Hack

    You know how it's a hassle keeping your phone charged?

    Multiply by 700 for a car. All those happy EV owners are a mystery. For a company fleet where you have people whose job is managing charging it is merely a cost of doing business. For a personal vehicle it is one more job you don't get any payment for doing.

    Don't you already have plenty of jobs you have to do where you don't get paid?

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @Barbarossa

    You know how it’s a hassle keeping your phone charged?

    I get your point. However my brand new Samsung flip4 holds a charge much netter than my old one did that I had for about 10 years (!) previously. I can go almost three days before I need to recharge it! Great little phone, however, I get your point!

  470. @Bashibuzuk
    @Mr. Hack

    A NATO country could fight its own wars and military interventions. Turkey for example is active in Syrak and Libya. NATO does not get involved in such situations. Poland might do it on their own or most likely as the central force in a coalition with the Baltic states under Anglo-saxon supervision.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    A NATO country could fight its own wars and military interventions. Turkey for example is active in Syrak and Libya.

    It sounds like a NATO country could be involved in an offensive war that it starts, without consulting other member countries, and proceed, unless the country being attacked decides to retaliate and attack the original aggressor party on its home turf? Everyone knows that any NATO country attacked is to be supported by all of the other NATO countries. Not a bad deal?…

    • Replies: @Bashibuzuk
    @Mr. Hack

    Not sure whether NATO's collective security would apply in that case. Perhaps a more realistic outcome would just be Balto-Slav killing each other, while the Atlanticist gleefully rub their hands.

  471. @Bashibuzuk
    @Mr. Hack

    Without a notable escalation, this war could drag on for years, depleting human and material ressources until something gives in Ukiestan or RusFed.

    My understanding was that Pynya would use tactical nukes if being defeated, but after his appeasing speech at the Valdaï Club last week, I think the fighting would just go on with the portions of mobiks going through the meat grinder in the coming months.

    Ukies could take Kherson or not, Ruskies might move against northern Ukraine from Belarus with the assistance of their Belarusian allies, but neither side will decisively change the situation on the frontline.

    That is why Poland arming itself to the teeth (even requesting US to park some nukes on its territory), is important. Poland is supposed to complete its military modernization by 2025.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/oct/05/poland-us-nuclear-wars-russia-putin-ukraine

    Pynya's decision about staying or not at the helm of RusFed in 2024 would weaken this Noviop pseudo-Russian state even more. Then possibly the Lyakhs might move in to carve Western Ukraine and Belarus for themselves and consolidate the Intermarium around them.

    By that time, Ukie population would be significantly reduced by war and emigration, while RusFedians would face immense hardships of their own: social, economic and demographic as well. The Поруха of the Eastern Slav would be advanced enough for the external players to move in and collect the spoils. Hundreds of thousands would be dead, Ukiestani economy becoming a shadow of itself, while the reduced RusFedian economy would become an appendix of the neo-imperial China.

    That's the most plausible protracted war scenario, but as Bekow wrote, plans are made and then reality happens.

    Replies: @A123, @Mr. Hack

    while RusFedians would face immense hardships of their own: social, economic and demographic as well.

    It’s coming sooner than what you may think. One of Russia’s main economists, Vladislav Inozemtsev, recently put out this damning report. I actually can’t believe that his report (or Inozemtsev himself) wasn’t buried somewhere. Please watch this clip and let me know what you think. Very interesting.

    • LOL: Mikhail
    • Replies: @Bashibuzuk
    @Mr. Hack

    I am aware of the damage done to RusFedian economy by sanctions and severing of ties with their best Western European customers. The outlook for RusFed is grim, but the victory of Xi Jinping's faction during the CPC congress would mean more confrontational China which would need RusFedian ressources to face the Globalized West.

    Therefore RusFed would probably not crumble outright, but it would certainly become more dependent on Chinese and even Iranian good will.

    https://www.timesofisrael.com/amid-sanctions-turmoil-iran-says-will-provide-russia-with-40-gas-turbines/

    RusFed might basically end up becoming the ressource base of the Chinese - Iranian Axis.

    https://www.mei.edu/publications/not-business-usual-chinese-militarys-visit-iran

    All is hinging on Chinese and Anglo-saxon decision making nowadays. The war in Ukraine is evolving towards a proxy conflict between the Chinese and the Anglo-saxon. Eastern Slav are used as cannon fodder while smarter people are setting scores.

    When either of Globalist projects, Western or Chinese, finally prevails, the Balto-Slav populations as a whole would most probably be among the losers. That has always been the historical result of the Balto-Slav feuds and tribal warfare, they have lost their religion, their lands and got their people slaughtered. But some people are too stupid to learn from their ancestral experiences and seek common ground to survive in a dangerous world we are heading into. So be it...

    Jedem das Seine.

    Replies: @AP, @Mr. Hack

    , @QCIC
    @Mr. Hack

    All major countries are highly corrupt and lie a lot, so it is difficult to interpret what we read.

    My simple view is that Russia views the Western meddling in Ukraine as an existential threat and they responded militarily and economically, which was the only option capable of stopping this meddling. Most of the Western responses to the SMO were expected, so much of what Russia is doing is preplanned. The mobilization was surely preplanned. There are many things yet to come which seem fairly predictable at this point.

    From a Russian perspective, some of the points discussed by the narrator are features, not bugs. The minor exodus gets rid of people and companies who do not like Russia and are often subsidized by the West in some way to cause trouble. Militarization of the economy may lead to new corruption, but that is a fair trade if it also gets rid of some of the entrenched internationalist corruption which has hobbled the economy for so long. In a militarized situation, the perpetrators of new corruption may find themselves in big trouble if their activities are explicitly anti-Russian.

    People in poor areas often are driven into the military either by force or propaganda. Once this happens their families tend to want to win the war and get them home. The families "support our troops" (Where have I heard that?) and are willing to deal with hardship.

    Estimating the performance of the Russian economy while the European, US and Chinese economies are also bearing unprecedented stresses is a Fool's Errand.

    The longer this goes on the more I suspect the Russian response is fairly inspired.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    , @Mike_from_Russia
    @Mr. Hack

    Just look at the list of videos of this channel. And it will immediately become obvious that this is a paid propagandist and nothing more

  472. @Mr. Hack
    @Bashibuzuk


    A NATO country could fight its own wars and military interventions. Turkey for example is active in Syrak and Libya.
     
    It sounds like a NATO country could be involved in an offensive war that it starts, without consulting other member countries, and proceed, unless the country being attacked decides to retaliate and attack the original aggressor party on its home turf? Everyone knows that any NATO country attacked is to be supported by all of the other NATO countries. Not a bad deal?...

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

    Not sure whether NATO’s collective security would apply in that case. Perhaps a more realistic outcome would just be Balto-Slav killing each other, while the Atlanticist gleefully rub their hands.

  473. @silviosilver
    @Mikel


    Well, I don’t know, it depends. It’s a far-fetched hypothetical. Two thoughts that come to mind is that it’s a much better alternative than a world where cockroaches and rats are the dominant species and that I can definitely feel much more compassion and afinity towards Africans than towards any non-human species.
     
    Fair enough. Feel free to tell me to fuck off if you find the topic distasteful, but I have an even farther-fetched hypothetical for you, the purpose of which isn't to "put you on the spot," but to provoke consideration about what is truly important in life. If you don't want to answer and don't want to tell me to fuck off, that's fine; I'll be happy if you just give it some thought.

    There is a comet hurtling towards the earth and you are faced with the following choice: you can either save your own race but the rest of humanity dies or you can save the rest of humanity but your own race dies. I know it's inconceivable that such a scenario could ever arise, but be a sport and play along eh? Which do you choose? For me the answer is obvious and I would give it unhesitatingly. (I don't mean to sound like I think I'm "better" than someone who would have to think about it; I'm saying it that way to report that I've thought about this sort of thing enough that I have a very good idea of where I stand.)

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Mikel, @Mikel, @Barbarossa

    There is a comet hurtling towards the earth and you are faced with the following choice: you can either save your own race but the rest of humanity dies or you can save the rest of humanity but your own race dies.

    I would choose saving my own race in a heartbeat, of course, although I think I would prefer the choice to be between saving all human females along with myself or saving all human males except for me.

    In fact, I am so selfish that if I learned today that a million people had died in a terrible earthquake in China I would feel sad but I wouldn’t have much problem falling asleep at night. On the other hand, if I lost a finger in an accident I would feel more agitated at bedtime.

    But as Adam Smith (the author of this hypothetical) explained, this doesn’t really mean that we are incapable of empathy towards distant human beings. It only means that we naturally care more about our immediate things than about the distant ones, which is the rational thing to do in order to function normally in life. He was nevertheless a humanist with very solid moral principles.

    • Replies: @silviosilver
    @Mikel

    Thank you for replying, and for presumably doing so honestly (since it's doubtful in the extreme someone, in today's world, would lie to make himself sound more 'racist' or selfish).


    But as Adam Smith (the author of this hypothetical) explained
     
    Actually, Adam Smith's hypothetical referred to the entirety of China being swallowed up by an earthquake, implying many times more than a million deaths. I take it that was a step too far you, so you trimmed it down to something more palatable. And that's fine - it's your conscience you have to live with.

    It's not a step too far for me though. In the case of China, I actually would be quite disturbed at the loss. I was a China admirer as a kid, and still think very highly of them, although geopolitical concerns tend to dominate my opinion at present. But the thought that all that would be gone, vanished, never to be seen again, that's quite disturbing.

    In contrast, and as I've said on this site before (which anyone can check to see I'm not just making this up now to 'compete' with you in terms of selfishness), if there were some hitherto unknown 'evolutionary timing' mechanism that caused everybody of majority African ancestry to drop dead this instant, the only tears of joy that providential event would elicit from me are tears of unrestrained joy.

    I don't think that's 'evil.' I didn't cause their extinction. I'm not taking pleasure in their suffering, because they're not suffering - they're, poof, gone. Imagine the relief knowing there are now parts of town you formerly wouldn't have dared set foot in which you can now stroll through freely. Imagine the first time you try it, cautiously inching forward, nervously looking about you, wondering "can it really be true?", and then the wave of relief that washes over you as you realize that, "why, it is, it is true - free! free at last!" haha. Imagine the relief knowing your ancestral continent is not going to be submerged under an avalanche of monkeyshit. Frankly, if that is 'evil', then I don't want to be 'good'; but more realistically, anyone who is not a teenage girl should, with a little thought, be able to understand that indifference, while it may form a component of evil, cannot be equated with evil.

    Replies: @AnonfromTN

  474. 😆Open Thread Humor Addendum😂

    Too good to pass these up. They are from this article.

    https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2022/10/the-week-in-pictures-happy-halloween-edition-2.php

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    Take that Andy Warhol !!!

     

     

    Elon the Barbarian !!!

     

  475. Bashibuzuk says:
    @Mr. Hack
    @Bashibuzuk


    while RusFedians would face immense hardships of their own: social, economic and demographic as well.
     
    It's coming sooner than what you may think. One of Russia's main economists, Vladislav Inozemtsev, recently put out this damning report. I actually can't believe that his report (or Inozemtsev himself) wasn't buried somewhere. Please watch this clip and let me know what you think. Very interesting.

    https://youtu.be/QMRn7jx7JqA

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk, @QCIC, @Mike_from_Russia

    I am aware of the damage done to RusFedian economy by sanctions and severing of ties with their best Western European customers. The outlook for RusFed is grim, but the victory of Xi Jinping’s faction during the CPC congress would mean more confrontational China which would need RusFedian ressources to face the Globalized West.

    Therefore RusFed would probably not crumble outright, but it would certainly become more dependent on Chinese and even Iranian good will.

    https://www.timesofisrael.com/amid-sanctions-turmoil-iran-says-will-provide-russia-with-40-gas-turbines/

    RusFed might basically end up becoming the ressource base of the Chinese – Iranian Axis.

    https://www.mei.edu/publications/not-business-usual-chinese-militarys-visit-iran

    All is hinging on Chinese and Anglo-saxon decision making nowadays. The war in Ukraine is evolving towards a proxy conflict between the Chinese and the Anglo-saxon. Eastern Slav are used as cannon fodder while smarter people are setting scores.

    When either of Globalist projects, Western or Chinese, finally prevails, the Balto-Slav populations as a whole would most probably be among the losers. That has always been the historical result of the Balto-Slav feuds and tribal warfare, they have lost their religion, their lands and got their people slaughtered. But some people are too stupid to learn from their ancestral experiences and seek common ground to survive in a dangerous world we are heading into. So be it…

    Jedem das Seine.

    • Replies: @AP
    @Bashibuzuk

    There is truth in this but it denies agency to the combatants. Russia (okay, RusFed) stupidly chose to invade Ukraine. This is a centuries-long pattern of behavior - Muscovy, Suzdal, Russia are the destroyers of other Slavs. Novgorod was the first victim, completely killed, it's elites boiled alive and its people slaughtered and dispersed by the Muscovite despot. Belarus has been mostly extinguished, massacred during World War II* and the leftovers assimilated. Poland was a failed project. Ukraine has been big and resistant but historically divided, until now. Russia now seeks to destroy Ukraine.

    The Slavs defend themselves from the onslaught of the brutal Muscovite Slav-killers; they know how to fight.

    Yes, the Anglo-Saxons and Chinese benefit from all this but they are not the instigators, pulling the strings, no matter how much this may help their ego. It's an ancient conflict.

    *Remember how Soviet partisans deliberately killed Germans near neutral Belarussian villages to get the German to slaughter the villagers?

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

    , @Mr. Hack
    @Bashibuzuk

    a


    more confrontational China which would need RusFedian ressources to face the Globalized West...RusFed might basically end up becoming the ressource base of the Chinese – Iranian Axis.
     
    That's pretty much the way that I see it too, the way that I called at the very beginning of the war. And basically sitting out on the sidelines, sitting on their thumbs. You did catch Inozemtsev's point that it's not only sanctions that are going to kill the Russian economy, but the loss of so many intelligent and able Russian men, in the prime of their lives, that are hiding and escaping from Russia in order to not get killed in this stupid war?

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

  476. for the lulz – there is some minor scandal going on at NBA, cause basketball star and flat earther antivaxer Kyrie Irving recently publicly promoted some “documental” movie based on this book, which is allegedly very “antisemitic”:

    HEBREWS TO NEGROES: WAKE UP BLACK AMERICA! Paperback – May 15, 2015
    by Ronald Dalton Jr.

    Maybe anybody here knows what is exactly the book or documentary about, cause shitty rambling advertising on Amazon is supervague, just got some vibe it might be maybe about Abraham being really black instead of Jewish, lol

    This book will expose the truths that have been hidden by the powers that be in America. Since the European and Arab slave traders stepped foot into Africa, blacks have been told lies about their heritage. This was all by Satan’s design for he is the father of lies. There is an old stereotypical expression that says “If you want to hide something from a Black person, put it in a book.” Well, this is THE BOOK that ALL Black people must read! Since biblical times, there has been a satanic agenda to destroy God’s Chosen People. This agenda still exists today and is carried on by man in many forms. Satan knows who God’s Chosen People are, but for centuries we have been blind to this knowledge even though it’s been right in front of our face. After many years of research, the time has finally come for ALL Black people to know the truth. Inside Hebrews To Negroes you will find the answers to all the burning questions you have wanted ask your parents, teachers and pastors for years.

  477. @silviosilver
    @Mikel


    Well, I don’t know, it depends. It’s a far-fetched hypothetical. Two thoughts that come to mind is that it’s a much better alternative than a world where cockroaches and rats are the dominant species and that I can definitely feel much more compassion and afinity towards Africans than towards any non-human species.
     
    Fair enough. Feel free to tell me to fuck off if you find the topic distasteful, but I have an even farther-fetched hypothetical for you, the purpose of which isn't to "put you on the spot," but to provoke consideration about what is truly important in life. If you don't want to answer and don't want to tell me to fuck off, that's fine; I'll be happy if you just give it some thought.

    There is a comet hurtling towards the earth and you are faced with the following choice: you can either save your own race but the rest of humanity dies or you can save the rest of humanity but your own race dies. I know it's inconceivable that such a scenario could ever arise, but be a sport and play along eh? Which do you choose? For me the answer is obvious and I would give it unhesitatingly. (I don't mean to sound like I think I'm "better" than someone who would have to think about it; I'm saying it that way to report that I've thought about this sort of thing enough that I have a very good idea of where I stand.)

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Mikel, @Mikel, @Barbarossa

    But on second thoughts, perhaps you are right that preservation of the species is not the main reason one could invoke to try to avoid following the current path of self-destruction. The main reason would probably the more immediate one of saving ourselves and our descendants from a global devastation without precedents.

  478. @Bashibuzuk
    @LatW

    https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2022/09/poland-will-have-a-large-and-modern-tank-army.html

    Poland is preparing to fight RusFed in the Baltics and Ukraine. Poland intends to become the focal point for the assembly of the Intermarium.

    The Intermarium is put in place to prevent the economic connectivity between Old Europe (France, Italy, Germany...) and China through the territories currently controlled, or in the case of Belarus, influenced by the RusFed.

    Old Europe is being sacrificed by the Atlanticist branch of the Globalist to prevent the appearance of the Eurasian economic and military superpower in which China and Old Europe would be the major stakeholders, with RusFed, Iran and Turkey being the minor ones.

    Poland is gambling to become an additional major stakeholder in this geopolitical situation that will define the first half of the twenty-first century in Eurasia. It plays the role of the Atlanticist redoubt in Europe (Fort Trump for G-d's sake...)

    Poland is playing its hand as usual, in a somewhat demonstrative manner. They could have ordered their main battle tanks and other military upgrades in Old Europe, but they didn't. By choosing to proceed that way they (over ?) emphasize their independence and what they see as their growing clout in the Eurasian affairs.

    As usual, Poland might end up punching above their weight. It has happened before and we know how it usually ends when it happens. Old Europe will not go gentle into that good night, it might well push Poland towards a direct confrontational with the RusFed in Ukraine, Belarus and the Baltics, and then backstab it when the going gets tough.

    https://www.thenationalnews.com/world/europe/2022/10/13/france-wont-retaliate-with-nuclear-weapons-if-russia-uses-them-in-ukraine/

    That would be some burden sharing all right: Poland and the Baltics would shoulder the burden, fall when backstabbed, and do some sharing with Germany clawing its lost historical territories back.

    Then OBOR would go through RusFed, Belarus and the German Baltic territories (including Königsberg) with the Nord Stream pipelines magically spirited back to life.

    That would allow for the birth of Eurasia from Dublin to Vladivostok with Han Chinese characteristics. China and Old Europe would have won this round of the Great Game 2.0.

    https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3197667/german-chancellor-olaf-scholz-visit-china-next-week

    https://ic.pics.livejournal.com/fon_eichwald/43081844/57393/57393_640.jpg

    Expectations...

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/aa/Poland_can_into_Wikipedia.jpg

    Reality... ?

    🙂

    Replies: @Beckow, @Mr. Hack, @Wokechoke, @AP, @LatW

    The Intermarium is put in place to prevent the economic connectivity between Old Europe (France, Italy, Germany…) and China through the territories currently controlled, or in the case of Belarus, influenced by the RusFed.

    Intermarium provides shelter from both Western would-be masters and Eastern despots. Khmelnytsky’s treason doomed both Poland and Ukraine for centuries. This is finally becoming better understood and undone. The Russians and their tools see it – thus, their bringing up Bandera at every opportunity. It isn’t working. Historically, Russia + Ukraine have done well in wars, but Russia alone could not handle Poland + Ukraine. When Poland and Ukraine were united they captured Moscow.* When Russia was without Ukraine it failed to defeat Poland (1921). Russia is unable to conquer Ukraine alone, the best it is doing is holding 15% (having grabbed 20% in the beginning) while bleeding out.

    Poland is playing its hand as usual, in a somewhat demonstrative manner. They could have ordered their main battle tanks and other military upgrades in Old Europe, but they didn’t.

    Because Germany is viewed as hesitant and unreliable. Not the best long-term strategic partner. Korea offered a much better deal: hundreds of tanks, plus joint production in Poland.

    *Had this victory been consolidated there would have been peace and unity among the Slavs and their Baltic cousins.

    • Replies: @Bashibuzuk
    @AP

    You forget to mention that Russian Empire prevailed against the Rzeczpospolita because of the endemic fatal flaws in the Polish political system. It was too unstable due to the overtly self-serving and quarrelsome attitude of the Polish Szlachta.

    These flaws have of course been a natural outcome of the Slav character and culture. The Balto-Slav are too unruly, and as consequence not organized enough to build strong and large nations and countries. Historically, they have never been capable of long term and large scale cooperation against their common enemies. They prefer short term gains from siding with their future enemies against their ethnic kin. That's how they lost their Western lands to German colonization.

    In Russian Tsardom, these flaws have been dealt with by adopting Golden Horde and Ottoman Empire building praxis and Byzantine understanding of Religious structures. It basically crushed the Slav вольница which has only survived among the Cossack for a time, until the German ordnung put in place by Piter the Great and his Russian Empire successors dealt the final blow against it during the Pugachev uprising. Russian muzhiks lost all freedom, but they built a true Empire for the elite.

    Possibly, the only way to prevent the Balto-Slav from tribalism and internecine warfare is to put them firmly under an Imperial control. The Poles are not cut for this job. Perhaps, I am being too pessimistic and a kind of confederation of Balto-Slav, Finno-Ugric and Vlakh republics can be organized by the Poles under the Atlanticist patronage, but given the historical record, I wouldn't count on it too much.

    Regarding main battle tanks, the French are also part of Old Europe and they have the Leclerc and together France and Germany have worked on the MGCS project for 10 years already.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Ground_Combat_System

    Buying from their EU neighbors (and financial sponsors) would have been the right thing to do, but Poland acted otherwise in a very demonstrative manner. This is again nothing new, Polish honor is historically bordering on hubris...

    Replies: @LatW

    , @AnonfromTN
    @AP

    I am not a history buff, so I have a question about Polish capture of Moscow. Do you mean that campaign that ended with Poles besieged in the Kremlin eating their horses (some say each other) and then surrendering to Russian irregulars organized by Minin and Pozharsky?

    Replies: @AP

  479. @Mr. Hack
    @Philip Owen


    The key item of wear is of course the battery.
     
    Do you know whether the lifespan of batteries has gone up substantially over say the last 10 years or not? For obvious reasons, I find the idea of having to purchase some kind of monthly insurance to replace a battery ahead of time a financial hassle that I don't want to have any part of . I would think that many current owners of such vehicles probably dump these cars just before the batteries die off. I wonder how this is handled in the secondary used car market? The distributorships must be able to replace the batteries in a costly manner and keep the retail prices down?...

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Barbarossa, @Philip Owen

    I think that Philip Owen is correct and the batteries are the biggest maintenance item. They are a pricey one and are thousands of dollars. I think a Tesla battery is like 20K out of pocket. Other components in electric cars like electric motors have very high levels of reliability, so that helps with overall maintenance costs. However, when those batteries go it’s a massive cost all at once. It seems that they are focusing on making “lifetime” batteries that never need replacement rather than a cheaper replacement aftermarket.

    I’m in the salt belt here and corrosion plays havoc with wiring and sensors on more advanced IC vehicles already, so I expect that electric cars will suffer notable corrosion issues too. That’s one of the many reasons that I run older stuff; they have less corrosion failures.

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @Barbarossa

    "lifetime batteries"? Wow! Now that would be a real game changer.

    Replies: @Barbarossa, @Barbarossa

  480. @Dmitry
    @LatW


    maybe you’re right, but it looks like in some cases Ukrainians are favored
     
    With the refugees topic, I think it is mostly just people in Western Europe who are compassionate, who are good Samaritans, who want to be helpful. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-KCefMou_4w. They are helping refugees not for a special political agenda ("Refugees welcome"), but they want to help refugees for moral reasons. Perhaps also virtue-signaling, which I think internet and social media is increasing incentives for virtue-signaling.

    But as oldtimer in this forum, I know AP's views about the refugee topic. He believes helping refugees is an indication of weakness and Western decay, says even now Western Europeans are a "decaying society" because they build the housing for Syrians.

    Ukrainians are dependent for the same kindness of Westerners not differently than Syrians, but he continues writing about the same Western Europeans who are helping Ukrainians who he believes are "decaying Westerners" because of their moral principles that caused them to help refugees including Ukrainians.

    It reminds of JackD in the Sailer forum who is complaining about racism against Jews, in the same thread writing equal racism about other nationalities, without noticing the contradictions. I just find mysterious how people could have a lack of ethical principles when it doesn't apply to the narrow group which they identified to their ego. It's like they are missing the part of the brain which allows you to have ethics or morality.

    , I didn’t mean to interfere.
     
    Well you reminded me of the old thread and posts. https://www.unz.com/akarlin/sixth-proof/#comment-3206911 AP believes people who are victims of history, are "punished by God". So, his Hindu religious views, imply that Ukrainians are being punished by Gods, or Gods. It sounds like Gods, as it is contradiction of a Christian view, the opposite of the New Testament.

    These views are one reason this forum was entertaining . I wouldn't want to criticize it too much, as it wouldn't be entertaining without this. Still, because sometimes it is not clear if people are actually serious, perhaps it needs to be said - victims of crimes are not responsible for the crimes against them

    In real world, most Ukrainians are not directly responsible for this disaster, neither most Russians. This is the same for most of the political disasters in the world. You're living on a volcano, and you might know this, but the only thing you might be responsible for, is to not escape from the danger zone.

    Protection of refugees is ethically important, but also pretty complicated topic. For one example, refugees are often from failed countries and carry an organizational culture of their failed country to the developed world. For another example, it's not always easy to know difference between refugees and economic immigrants. Also there is bad faith when people who support open borders immigration can be often using rhetoric about refugees, when they want to open borders for economic immigrants.

    Still, either you believe there should be protection of refugees or not. You can't say "protect refugees when they are from my nationality I have connected my ego to", but at the same time say it is a sign of Western decay when those refugees "are not my nationality". The purpose of helping refugees was not self-interest for your chosen group.

    Could it be that she just wanted to leave and asked her dad to get her an Israeli passport
     
    I don't think her Israeli passport can be so old as the 1990s when father was still living. Although she has connection to the Israeli government for some years, as she working as a promoter for their Minister of Tourism.

    she’s never struck me as all too “dangerous”.
     
    Sure, she is part of the game and has been enjoying the position of loyal pseudo-opposition.

    Replies: @silviosilver, @AP

    Well you reminded me of the old thread and posts. https://www.unz.com/akarlin/sixth-proof/#comment-3206911 AP believes people who are victims of history, are “punished by God”. So, his Hindu religious views

    Why Hindu? As you know, locals in Rus blamed sin for the Mongol catastrophe. They were not Hindus.

    The non-Christian, Soviet parts of Ukraine is being most devastated by Putin. Meanwhile there is a real estate boom in the West, despite occasional blackouts now:

    The misery in the East is sad and terrible of course. It is a tragedy, nothing to celebrate.

    In real world, most Ukrainians are not directly responsible for this disaster, neither most Russians.

    Ukrainians certainly are not, because Ukraine did not invade other countries but was invaded.

    On the other hand, both Putin and the war are popular among Russians so they bear responsibility. Is it because you are from Russia that you try to muddy this clear issue?

    You’re living on a volcano

    Russians elected and reelected Putin and polls consistently show that Russians support the war. The support is starting to decline because Russians are dying in larger numbers but this just means Russians don’t like to lose their own lives, but don’t mind killing Ukrainians.

    Yes, not all Russians, but the majority.

    Still, either you believe there should be protection of refugees or not. You can’t say “protect refugees when they are from my nationality I have connected my ego to”, but at the same time say it is a sign of Western decay when those refugees “are not my nationality”

    Why?

    • Replies: @Dmitry
    @AP


    Why Hindu? As you know
     
    Sure, Hindu is a religion with sophisticated theology, which I would not insult. Your views seem more like something Aztec or belief in rain gods.

    there is a real estate boom in the West
     
    So, you would believe the area which experiences this property boom and asset increase are therefore becoming further from entering the Kingdom of Heaven, in the New Testament.

    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Mark%2010:24-26&version=KJ21
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=James+5%3A1-5&version=ESV
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=James+2%3A5&version=ESV
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke+1%3A53&version=ESV
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke+6%3A20-21&version=ESV
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke+12%3A33


    is being most devastated by

     

    Being most devastated, suffering and persecuted is not indicator of unrighteousness, in the New Testament teaching. It's not Hinduism or belief in rain gods. Cross is a symbol of suffering.

    If you have a comfortable time, with none persecuting you, without suffering, this is the time you would be worried as you do not carry the cross, as precondition for anyone who follows Jesus is carrying a Cross and having persecutions, as they write constantly.

    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew%2010:37-39&version=KJ21
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2+Timothy+3%3A12-12&version=NIV
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1+Peter+4%3A13-14&version=AMP


    Putin and polls consistently show that Russians support the war.
     
    And the polls in Cuba, will show Cuba has the best healthcare system in the world.

    Putin.. are popular among Russians
     
    You were promoting him to us. https://www.unz.com/akarlin/russias-nationalist-turn/#comment-4928594

    Why?

     

    Mainly Western Europeans are supporting the refugees, whether you think this is a good idea or not from the political view, because they feel compassion for the victims of the war (although of course there is also some virtue signaling there). It's morality for them and for this reason doesn't match exactly following of rational self-interest.

    And whether you agree with him or not, for Jesus (which is a part of the cultural basis for Western Europe), he emphasized especially help of the outsider who is specifically from not your tribe or religion. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke%2010%3A25-37&version=NIV

    Morality is a separate topic than self-promotion of your tribe, grifting, supporting your perceived self-interest, smelling your own farts.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk, @AP

  481. @Bashibuzuk
    @Mr. Hack

    I am aware of the damage done to RusFedian economy by sanctions and severing of ties with their best Western European customers. The outlook for RusFed is grim, but the victory of Xi Jinping's faction during the CPC congress would mean more confrontational China which would need RusFedian ressources to face the Globalized West.

    Therefore RusFed would probably not crumble outright, but it would certainly become more dependent on Chinese and even Iranian good will.

    https://www.timesofisrael.com/amid-sanctions-turmoil-iran-says-will-provide-russia-with-40-gas-turbines/

    RusFed might basically end up becoming the ressource base of the Chinese - Iranian Axis.

    https://www.mei.edu/publications/not-business-usual-chinese-militarys-visit-iran

    All is hinging on Chinese and Anglo-saxon decision making nowadays. The war in Ukraine is evolving towards a proxy conflict between the Chinese and the Anglo-saxon. Eastern Slav are used as cannon fodder while smarter people are setting scores.

    When either of Globalist projects, Western or Chinese, finally prevails, the Balto-Slav populations as a whole would most probably be among the losers. That has always been the historical result of the Balto-Slav feuds and tribal warfare, they have lost their religion, their lands and got their people slaughtered. But some people are too stupid to learn from their ancestral experiences and seek common ground to survive in a dangerous world we are heading into. So be it...

    Jedem das Seine.

    Replies: @AP, @Mr. Hack

    There is truth in this but it denies agency to the combatants. Russia (okay, RusFed) stupidly chose to invade Ukraine. This is a centuries-long pattern of behavior – Muscovy, Suzdal, Russia are the destroyers of other Slavs. Novgorod was the first victim, completely killed, it’s elites boiled alive and its people slaughtered and dispersed by the Muscovite despot. Belarus has been mostly extinguished, massacred during World War II* and the leftovers assimilated. Poland was a failed project. Ukraine has been big and resistant but historically divided, until now. Russia now seeks to destroy Ukraine.

    The Slavs defend themselves from the onslaught of the brutal Muscovite Slav-killers; they know how to fight.

    Yes, the Anglo-Saxons and Chinese benefit from all this but they are not the instigators, pulling the strings, no matter how much this may help their ego. It’s an ancient conflict.

    *Remember how Soviet partisans deliberately killed Germans near neutral Belarussian villages to get the German to slaughter the villagers?

    • Agree: Mr. Hack
    • Replies: @Bashibuzuk
    @AP


    The Slavs defend themselves from the onslaught of the brutal Muscovite Slav-killers; they know how to fight.
     
    Oh come on AP, this is too much hyperbole even though historically some Polish nationalists saw themselves as the defenders of the Slav against the Germanized Russian Empire. RusFed is not a Russian Empire, it is a Noviop Potemkin village, a simulacre, бл☆дский цирк of a country. All it has to with Zalesskaya Rus' of Suzdal'-Vladimir's times is its geographic location. This is irrelevant, it is an equivalent to a "historical phantom limb pain".

    Novgorod was slowly, but surely evolving towards a Hanseatic dominion under Baltic Germanic patronage. This is something Soviet historians don't like to mention, but even though Alexander Nevskyi prevailed against the Teutonic and Sword-bearing Knights, the economy of Novgorod ended up dominated by Germanic merchants under the patronage of the Catholic Church. I like Novgorodian ethos, but their territory would have been lost to Rus if Muscovy wouldn't have acted so ruthlessly.

    https://statehistory.ru/books/Iosif-Kulisher_Istoriya-russkogo-narodnogo-khozyaystva/20

    About the Anglo-saxon and their Atlanticist henchmen, I agree with Fursov nearly entirely. They are the main actors of the Western Globalization since at least the eighteenth century. They have played and won the first Great Game against Russian Empire, then they pushed German Third Reich and Soviets to annihilate each other. They have won the Cold War and now they work to prevent the Chinese OBOR from ever becoming a reality. The Anglosphere thalassocracy has its modus operandi and all that what was happening in RusFed and Ukiestan territories for at least the last two generations is fitting entirely into this pattern.

    BTW, today both RusFedian Ministry of Defence and Foreign Affairs have directly accused the UK special services of being behind the Nord Stream attacks. I am not surprised in the slightest. As ataman Krasnov said just before being handed to Soviet killers in Lienz: "Опять Ангичанка гадит ?".

    https://www.warhistoryonline.com/war-articles/lienz-cossacks.html

    https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/britains-cossack-betrayal/

    As long as Balto-Slav are ready to kill each other, the Anglo-saxon will be happy to oblige and provide guidance and weapons. Then they will reap the bloody harvest (they already started, just see the record gains of the British and American oil and gas industries). It's business only, nothing personal. As usual...

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @S

  482. @Bashibuzuk
    @Mr. Hack

    I am aware of the damage done to RusFedian economy by sanctions and severing of ties with their best Western European customers. The outlook for RusFed is grim, but the victory of Xi Jinping's faction during the CPC congress would mean more confrontational China which would need RusFedian ressources to face the Globalized West.

    Therefore RusFed would probably not crumble outright, but it would certainly become more dependent on Chinese and even Iranian good will.

    https://www.timesofisrael.com/amid-sanctions-turmoil-iran-says-will-provide-russia-with-40-gas-turbines/

    RusFed might basically end up becoming the ressource base of the Chinese - Iranian Axis.

    https://www.mei.edu/publications/not-business-usual-chinese-militarys-visit-iran

    All is hinging on Chinese and Anglo-saxon decision making nowadays. The war in Ukraine is evolving towards a proxy conflict between the Chinese and the Anglo-saxon. Eastern Slav are used as cannon fodder while smarter people are setting scores.

    When either of Globalist projects, Western or Chinese, finally prevails, the Balto-Slav populations as a whole would most probably be among the losers. That has always been the historical result of the Balto-Slav feuds and tribal warfare, they have lost their religion, their lands and got their people slaughtered. But some people are too stupid to learn from their ancestral experiences and seek common ground to survive in a dangerous world we are heading into. So be it...

    Jedem das Seine.

    Replies: @AP, @Mr. Hack

    a

    more confrontational China which would need RusFedian ressources to face the Globalized West…RusFed might basically end up becoming the ressource base of the Chinese – Iranian Axis.

    That’s pretty much the way that I see it too, the way that I called at the very beginning of the war. And basically sitting out on the sidelines, sitting on their thumbs. You did catch Inozemtsev’s point that it’s not only sanctions that are going to kill the Russian economy, but the loss of so many intelligent and able Russian men, in the prime of their lives, that are hiding and escaping from Russia in order to not get killed in this stupid war?

    • Replies: @Bashibuzuk
    @Mr. Hack


    so many intelligent and able Russian men, in the prime of their lives, that are hiding and escaping from Russia in order to not get killed in this stupid war?
     
    A lot of people most fitting this description, that I know in Moscow and Piter do not support Noviop RusFedian regime. They do not support this war either. They know this war is bad for both Russians and Ukrainians. But they can do nothing against it. I am certain that a lot of highly intelligent people in Ukraine feel the same towards the Khazarian Ukiestan and this war that it had started in 2014 by using the Ukrainian nationalists as a proxy, just like the Noviop have used the Russkyi Mir militants in Donbass as a proxy.

    I have since the very beginning written that I see this war as tragedy regardless of the potential winning side. Many people among my personal acquaintances think likewise. Balto-Slav at large will gain nothing during this conflict and they might end up losing very much. We might all end up directly impacted by a nuclear war. This is all very sad and disheartening.
  483. @Barbarossa
    @Mr. Hack

    I think that Philip Owen is correct and the batteries are the biggest maintenance item. They are a pricey one and are thousands of dollars. I think a Tesla battery is like 20K out of pocket. Other components in electric cars like electric motors have very high levels of reliability, so that helps with overall maintenance costs. However, when those batteries go it's a massive cost all at once. It seems that they are focusing on making "lifetime" batteries that never need replacement rather than a cheaper replacement aftermarket.

    I'm in the salt belt here and corrosion plays havoc with wiring and sensors on more advanced IC vehicles already, so I expect that electric cars will suffer notable corrosion issues too. That's one of the many reasons that I run older stuff; they have less corrosion failures.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    “lifetime batteries”? Wow! Now that would be a real game changer.

    • Replies: @Barbarossa
    @Mr. Hack

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesmorris/2022/05/28/tesla-researcher-demonstrates-100-year-4-million-mile-battery/

    , @Barbarossa
    @Mr. Hack

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesmorris/2022/05/28/tesla-researcher-demonstrates-100-year-4-million-mile-battery/

    Now I just need one of these for my PV system!

  484. Bashibuzuk says:
    @AP
    @Bashibuzuk


    The Intermarium is put in place to prevent the economic connectivity between Old Europe (France, Italy, Germany…) and China through the territories currently controlled, or in the case of Belarus, influenced by the RusFed.
     
    Intermarium provides shelter from both Western would-be masters and Eastern despots. Khmelnytsky's treason doomed both Poland and Ukraine for centuries. This is finally becoming better understood and undone. The Russians and their tools see it - thus, their bringing up Bandera at every opportunity. It isn't working. Historically, Russia + Ukraine have done well in wars, but Russia alone could not handle Poland + Ukraine. When Poland and Ukraine were united they captured Moscow.* When Russia was without Ukraine it failed to defeat Poland (1921). Russia is unable to conquer Ukraine alone, the best it is doing is holding 15% (having grabbed 20% in the beginning) while bleeding out.

    Poland is playing its hand as usual, in a somewhat demonstrative manner. They could have ordered their main battle tanks and other military upgrades in Old Europe, but they didn’t.
     
    Because Germany is viewed as hesitant and unreliable. Not the best long-term strategic partner. Korea offered a much better deal: hundreds of tanks, plus joint production in Poland.

    *Had this victory been consolidated there would have been peace and unity among the Slavs and their Baltic cousins.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk, @AnonfromTN

    You forget to mention that Russian Empire prevailed against the Rzeczpospolita because of the endemic fatal flaws in the Polish political system. It was too unstable due to the overtly self-serving and quarrelsome attitude of the Polish Szlachta.

    These flaws have of course been a natural outcome of the Slav character and culture. The Balto-Slav are too unruly, and as consequence not organized enough to build strong and large nations and countries. Historically, they have never been capable of long term and large scale cooperation against their common enemies. They prefer short term gains from siding with their future enemies against their ethnic kin. That’s how they lost their Western lands to German colonization.

    In Russian Tsardom, these flaws have been dealt with by adopting Golden Horde and Ottoman Empire building praxis and Byzantine understanding of Religious structures. It basically crushed the Slav вольница which has only survived among the Cossack for a time, until the German ordnung put in place by Piter the Great and his Russian Empire successors dealt the final blow against it during the Pugachev uprising. Russian muzhiks lost all freedom, but they built a true Empire for the elite.

    Possibly, the only way to prevent the Balto-Slav from tribalism and internecine warfare is to put them firmly under an Imperial control. The Poles are not cut for this job. Perhaps, I am being too pessimistic and a kind of confederation of Balto-Slav, Finno-Ugric and Vlakh republics can be organized by the Poles under the Atlanticist patronage, but given the historical record, I wouldn’t count on it too much.

    Regarding main battle tanks, the French are also part of Old Europe and they have the Leclerc and together France and Germany have worked on the MGCS project for 10 years already.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Ground_Combat_System

    Buying from their EU neighbors (and financial sponsors) would have been the right thing to do, but Poland acted otherwise in a very demonstrative manner. This is again nothing new, Polish honor is historically bordering on hubris…

    • Replies: @LatW
    @Bashibuzuk


    In Russian Tsardom, these flaws have been dealt with by adopting Golden Horde and Ottoman Empire building praxis and Byzantine understanding of Religious structures. It basically crushed the Slav вольница which has only survived among the Cossack for a time, until the German ordnung put in place by Piter the Great and his Russian Empire successors dealt the final blow against it during the Pugachev uprising. Russian muzhiks lost all freedom, but they built a true Empire for the elite.
     
    This is quite sad, actually. There are attractive things about this concept of вольница. It may not work as an organizational principle (since it basically sounds like bailing from tyranny), but it could be used for ideological purposes. A Russian freedom fighter says: "Я вольный". Which is distinct from свободный (free). It comes from the Balto-Slav word "wave". It means that the will actively arises from the human being (positive liberty, self-mastery). Yes, it is to some extent "unruly" (free, unencumbered, wild, powerful, subjective, independent, even licentious). But... there are major positives to this quality. If this quality can somehow be put in a framework and channeled positively, it can be quite awesome.

    The truth is - for Balto-Slav, neither the Byzantine despotism nor the German Ordnung are the best. There has to be our own way, that is best for our own mentality and temperament. It is something in between of those two and something really special that we must seek.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

  485. @silviosilver
    @Dmitry


    It reminds of JackD in the Sailer forum who is complaining about racism against Jews, in the same thread writing equal racism about other nationalities, without noticing the contradictions.
     
    What are the supposed "contradictions"? Imo there aren't any. JackD believes WNs are wrong about Jews but right about blacks. Those beliefs are in no way contradictory.

    Still, either you believe there should be protection of refugees or not. You can’t say “protect refugees when they are from my nationality I have connected my ego to”, but at the same time say it is a sign of Western decay when those refugees “are not my nationality”.
     
    That's like saying you can't share your lunch with your friend but refuse to share it with strangers. Why can't I? It's my lunch, I'll share it with whoever I please. Or like saying a company isn't allowed to give jobs to some applicants but refuse others, it has to take on all applicants. What kind of retarded logic is that? Same thing my country.

    Ethnicity, race, religion, cultural identity - these are all excellent grounds for discriminating between "refugee" (99% bogus anyway) sources. It's one thousand percent justifiable to reject anyone on any one of these grounds.

    (To anyone's knowledge, has Dmitry ever huffed and moaned about Israel refusing Syrian "refugees"? They're rich and right next door, so one might well wonder how it is he's overlooked such a simple solution.)

    For another example, it’s not always easy to know difference between refugees and economic immigrants.
     
    You're right. And since we can't know who is legitimate and who is simply bullshitting, I guess we'll just have to say 'no' to everybody then. It's the country's well-being and demographic future at stake, so best not to gamble with it.

    Replies: @Dmitry

    we’ll just have to say ‘no’ to everybody then. It’s the country’s well-being and demographic future at stake

    I don’t think supporting refugees in the context where you can’t distinguish from economic immigration or add time-limits in the reality, is part of self-interest of Western European citizens and wrote enough my views about this topic.
    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-169/#comment-4996173

    But there is still a problem of refugees and need of solution, for needing protection from war and persecution is the one of the most basic things we deserve. You would still need an internationally ruled territory, like artificial country, for their shelter, if they are not equally distributed by the countries near the conflict.

    I fund Ukrainian refugees, even while not being European, so I can’t say I’m helping this problem. There is also no reason refugees have to be disproportionately more in developed countries than undeveloped countries. Syrians could go to Bolivia and we could have funded Ukrainian refugees to safety in Zambia. Being refugee doesn’t need to upgrade your conditions, the meaning is to give you a safe place.

    One of the conditions in the UN convention on refugees, is the obligation is for the first safe country to give protection. So, e.g. obligation for shelter of Syrians, is the regional countries, not Europe, Singapore or New Zealand.

    Ethnicity, race, religion, cultural identity – these are all excellent grounds for discriminating between “refugee”

    Those are normal discriminating between immigrants, but refugees are people who you would not accept as an immigrant, but which are receiving temporary shelter.

    Every main country has signed a contract about refugees in the 1951. Read articles 3 and 4. Also you can see refugee is a temporary shelter etc.
    https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/1951_Refugee_Convention

    Refugee is not supposed to be the same category as immigration. They are given shelter on basis of the danger, temporary, time-limit and should also be in the first safe country.

    Perhaps before the Second World War, refugee has a different meaning. But after the Second World War, there is a clear legal concept of refugee and it’s based on needing shelter, not immigration.

    supposed “contradictions”? Imo there aren’t any. Jack D believes WNs are wrong about Jews but right about blacks

    Jack D is writing people are unfair about Jews, criticizing based on small stories, to the racist views about general group, and then in same thread writes how his dog dislikes black people. In the next post. If Jack D was not born in a family with a Jewish ancestor, he would have be the most racist against Jewish people in this forum. It’s like God is trying to teach him something but he still avoids the implications.

    As for AP. When you are complaining that Western Europeans are not real Europe because they help refugees, which is the same basis that they help Ukrainian refugees, or that it’s good Eastern Europe should divert German money because this money would go to fund refugees. But then write about he is helping Ukrainian refugees in Europe.

    The basis for his argument that Eastern Europe should pull Western Europeans’ money, is because Western Europeans were giving money for refugees. (https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-200/#comment-5622490) If AP was not born in a family with ancestors from a third world warzone, but with 100% pure Swiss or English blood. Well it’s also like God is trying to tell him something with its choice of family origin.

    Dmitry ever huffed and moaned about Israel refusing Syrian “refugees”?

    I never wrote any post criticizing countries for refusing refugees, except in one post, Israel is the only country I criticized one time for too strict policy against refugees (https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-179-russia-ukraine-cont/#comment-5226796), although even then with the restrictive Israel policy, it is perhaps unfair.

    To be fair about Israel, there is already some chaos there with the refugees from East Africa which you can see when you visit them, because there are no diplomatic relations with the source country of refugees (Sudan), the time-limits are not possible to impose and it converted to permanent immigration a decade later.

    Syrian refugees would be similar there, as the High Court would never allow the time-limits as Israel and Syria are in war with each other and they would become a permanent immigration. However, with Ukrainian refugees, Israel had no easy justification to avoid the 1951 convention on refugees. Israel and Ukraine have diplomatic relations, so time-limit could be followed. They could argue they are not the first country for Ukrainians to escape to, but a lot of Ukrainians bought a plane ticket. Then many trapped in the airport or returned to Ukraine. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_YoVgQK2Mg.

  486. @Mr. Hack
    @Bashibuzuk


    while RusFedians would face immense hardships of their own: social, economic and demographic as well.
     
    It's coming sooner than what you may think. One of Russia's main economists, Vladislav Inozemtsev, recently put out this damning report. I actually can't believe that his report (or Inozemtsev himself) wasn't buried somewhere. Please watch this clip and let me know what you think. Very interesting.

    https://youtu.be/QMRn7jx7JqA

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk, @QCIC, @Mike_from_Russia

    All major countries are highly corrupt and lie a lot, so it is difficult to interpret what we read.

    My simple view is that Russia views the Western meddling in Ukraine as an existential threat and they responded militarily and economically, which was the only option capable of stopping this meddling. Most of the Western responses to the SMO were expected, so much of what Russia is doing is preplanned. The mobilization was surely preplanned. There are many things yet to come which seem fairly predictable at this point.

    From a Russian perspective, some of the points discussed by the narrator are features, not bugs. The minor exodus gets rid of people and companies who do not like Russia and are often subsidized by the West in some way to cause trouble. Militarization of the economy may lead to new corruption, but that is a fair trade if it also gets rid of some of the entrenched internationalist corruption which has hobbled the economy for so long. In a militarized situation, the perpetrators of new corruption may find themselves in big trouble if their activities are explicitly anti-Russian.

    People in poor areas often are driven into the military either by force or propaganda. Once this happens their families tend to want to win the war and get them home. The families “support our troops” (Where have I heard that?) and are willing to deal with hardship.

    Estimating the performance of the Russian economy while the European, US and Chinese economies are also bearing unprecedented stresses is a Fool’s Errand.

    The longer this goes on the more I suspect the Russian response is fairly inspired.

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @QCIC

    As I follow the economic news regarding all the major parts of the world, it's no foolish thing to follow this type of news within Russia iteself, especially during war time. What made the paper that Vladislav Inozemtsev wrote so very prescient is that he's ostensibly an insider, that's spent many years at the top as a serious Russian economist. It's too bad that nobody here bothered to watch the video clip that I included - could have been the start of an interesting mini thread here. Instead we end up getting the same old, same old. I don't get it, I know that many of the readers of this blog have a keen interest in economics?...

    Replies: @QCIC

  487. @silviosilver
    @Mikel


    Well, I don’t know, it depends. It’s a far-fetched hypothetical. Two thoughts that come to mind is that it’s a much better alternative than a world where cockroaches and rats are the dominant species and that I can definitely feel much more compassion and afinity towards Africans than towards any non-human species.
     
    Fair enough. Feel free to tell me to fuck off if you find the topic distasteful, but I have an even farther-fetched hypothetical for you, the purpose of which isn't to "put you on the spot," but to provoke consideration about what is truly important in life. If you don't want to answer and don't want to tell me to fuck off, that's fine; I'll be happy if you just give it some thought.

    There is a comet hurtling towards the earth and you are faced with the following choice: you can either save your own race but the rest of humanity dies or you can save the rest of humanity but your own race dies. I know it's inconceivable that such a scenario could ever arise, but be a sport and play along eh? Which do you choose? For me the answer is obvious and I would give it unhesitatingly. (I don't mean to sound like I think I'm "better" than someone who would have to think about it; I'm saying it that way to report that I've thought about this sort of thing enough that I have a very good idea of where I stand.)

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Mikel, @Mikel, @Barbarossa

    you can either save your own race but the rest of humanity dies or you can save the rest of humanity but your own race dies.

    The problem with a hypothetical like this is the question of what even constitutes “your own race”. I’m primarily Irish and German, but I live in the US as has my family for several generations. I consider myself a Celt in terms of my heritage, but quite frankly I have no real ties to Ireland or anyone there. I also consider the ubiquitous white American shit-lib to be the most vile characters around. While they may be the same color as me, they are in opposition to everything I believe in.

    So the problem is that any concept of race for someone like me is at this point a purely abstract exercise, completely divorced from any particular or specific considerations. In the past, this would not be true and race or ethnicity would have been tied to the particular interests and concerns of a specific corner of the world.

    This is why I find the concept of tribe more compelling in the current reality than race. I have a pretty cohesive local community in which we do a lot to help each other out and further shared goals and interests. Over the years there has also been a level of ideological convergence within that group as we find a measure of consensus and shared vision. There seems to be a high level of commitment to staying in the area and ensuring that our kids are able to as well should they choose to. This seems to me the beginning of a proto-culture.

    This is not an abstraction in any sense, but rooted in our day to day lives and interests and so is much more real, solid, and more likely durable than an identity rooted in a constructed racial identity. If you can assemble a group of people that think racially as you do, I suppose that you could do the same thing in a real life community, but I’ve not seen much evidence of such a thing.

    So what I see as the most important action is to build your own localized proto-culture if possible wherever you find yourself by choice or necessity. A collective purpose and vision also translates into political clout, as I’ve mentioned as per the local reasonableness and flexibility in applying the laws to conform to they way we want our lives to collectively be.

    So, you see why I take an interest in groups that have maintained a separate identity? It’s not a matter of copying or LARPing, but there are principals to learn and emulate. The first and most basic are the uniting ties of specificity. Racism is basically a liberal reaction to loss of identity which puts the cart before the horse. Race is incidental, not the foundation of identity, but it is the natural result of that sharing of common place and common goals and traditions.

    And quite honestly my main goal in the medium term is to leave something better for my own children. Internet racism is going to accomplish nothing that way, while building a durable and coherent community around me will.

    • Agree: Bashibuzuk
  488. Bashibuzuk says:
    @AP
    @Bashibuzuk

    There is truth in this but it denies agency to the combatants. Russia (okay, RusFed) stupidly chose to invade Ukraine. This is a centuries-long pattern of behavior - Muscovy, Suzdal, Russia are the destroyers of other Slavs. Novgorod was the first victim, completely killed, it's elites boiled alive and its people slaughtered and dispersed by the Muscovite despot. Belarus has been mostly extinguished, massacred during World War II* and the leftovers assimilated. Poland was a failed project. Ukraine has been big and resistant but historically divided, until now. Russia now seeks to destroy Ukraine.

    The Slavs defend themselves from the onslaught of the brutal Muscovite Slav-killers; they know how to fight.

    Yes, the Anglo-Saxons and Chinese benefit from all this but they are not the instigators, pulling the strings, no matter how much this may help their ego. It's an ancient conflict.

    *Remember how Soviet partisans deliberately killed Germans near neutral Belarussian villages to get the German to slaughter the villagers?

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

    The Slavs defend themselves from the onslaught of the brutal Muscovite Slav-killers; they know how to fight.

    Oh come on AP, this is too much hyperbole even though historically some Polish nationalists saw themselves as the defenders of the Slav against the Germanized Russian Empire. RusFed is not a Russian Empire, it is a Noviop Potemkin village, a simulacre, бл☆дский цирк of a country. All it has to with Zalesskaya Rus’ of Suzdal’-Vladimir’s times is its geographic location. This is irrelevant, it is an equivalent to a “historical phantom limb pain”.

    Novgorod was slowly, but surely evolving towards a Hanseatic dominion under Baltic Germanic patronage. This is something Soviet historians don’t like to mention, but even though Alexander Nevskyi prevailed against the Teutonic and Sword-bearing Knights, the economy of Novgorod ended up dominated by Germanic merchants under the patronage of the Catholic Church. I like Novgorodian ethos, but their territory would have been lost to Rus if Muscovy wouldn’t have acted so ruthlessly.

    https://statehistory.ru/books/Iosif-Kulisher_Istoriya-russkogo-narodnogo-khozyaystva/20

    About the Anglo-saxon and their Atlanticist henchmen, I agree with Fursov nearly entirely. They are the main actors of the Western Globalization since at least the eighteenth century. They have played and won the first Great Game against Russian Empire, then they pushed German Third Reich and Soviets to annihilate each other. They have won the Cold War and now they work to prevent the Chinese OBOR from ever becoming a reality. The Anglosphere thalassocracy has its modus operandi and all that what was happening in RusFed and Ukiestan territories for at least the last two generations is fitting entirely into this pattern.

    BTW, today both RusFedian Ministry of Defence and Foreign Affairs have directly accused the UK special services of being behind the Nord Stream attacks. I am not surprised in the slightest. As ataman Krasnov said just before being handed to Soviet killers in Lienz: “Опять Ангичанка гадит ?”.

    https://www.warhistoryonline.com/war-articles/lienz-cossacks.html

    https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/britains-cossack-betrayal/

    As long as Balto-Slav are ready to kill each other, the Anglo-saxon will be happy to oblige and provide guidance and weapons. Then they will reap the bloody harvest (they already started, just see the record gains of the British and American oil and gas industries). It’s business only, nothing personal. As usual…

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @Bashibuzuk


    RusFed is not a Russian Empire, it is a Noviop Potemkin village, a simulacre, бл☆дский цирк of a country. All it has to with Zalesskaya Rus’ of Suzdal’-Vladimir’s times is its geographic location.
     
    I'm not sure that I buy this. Trying to disassociate Russia with its historic past is untenable, otherwise all the countries of the world should do the same. All countries change over time, their boundaries change, their needs and visions for the future change, even their language changes. Russia had a long period of time as an empire (centuries), most even attribute the soviet period to this process. Most would attribute Putin's fanatical attempts to reabsorb Ukraine under Russian dominion as just another rung in the latter to finish the job, and really reassume Russia's place in the world as a true empire. Blaming "RusFed's" disastrous war against Ukraine on conspiracy theories, where outside Western sources are controlling Putler's war moves, as some sort of grand marionette play, can only be taken so far...with a grain of salt.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

    , @S
    @Bashibuzuk


    About the Anglo-saxon and their Atlanticist henchmen, I agree with Fursov nearly entirely. They are the main actors of the Western Globalization since at least the eighteenth century. They have played and won the first Great Game against Russian Empire, then they pushed German Third Reich and Soviets to annihilate each other.
     
    I wasn't familiar with this Fursov, so I thought I would do some checking around on him. I came across a talk he gave about nine years ago (linked below) where he made many good points.

    He starts off with a WWII era quote in regards to what I call the systematic murder of the world's peoples, ie the war being made against their identities with the aim of destroying them, something that both an individualistic Capitalism, and, it's complimentary mirror image sister ideology, a collectivist Communism, are entirely in agreement with each other about.

    The destruction of identity, ie peoplehood, is a primary point of each of the world wars, including this present one, that, and consolidating (and adding on to) the already overwhelming global hegemony the US/UK had achieved when they formed their special relationship circa 1900.

    The modern 'neo-liberalism' (or, same difference, 'neo-conservativism') Fursov speaks of is simply the political embodiment of the synthesis of Capitalism and Communism, ie the political ideology of Global Multi-Culturalism and it's representative planned world state, the United States of the World*.

    'I would like to start my talk with a quotation from the quintessential British imperialist, Winston Churchill, who, in 1940, wrote in a letter, that “Great Britain was fighting not against Hitler, and not even against National Socialism, but against the spirit of the German people, against the spirit of Schiller, so that this spirit would never be reborn.”'
     
    * The 'United States of the World' is a reference to a planned future world state, and is a Masonic concept and term which can be found used historically by both Capitalist and Communist ideologues.

    https://schillerinstitute.com/media/andrey-fursov-the-current-world-crisis-its-social-nature-and-challenge-to-social-science/
  489. @Mr. Hack
    @Barbarossa

    "lifetime batteries"? Wow! Now that would be a real game changer.

    Replies: @Barbarossa, @Barbarossa

  490. @Mr. Hack
    @Barbarossa

    "lifetime batteries"? Wow! Now that would be a real game changer.

    Replies: @Barbarossa, @Barbarossa

  491. Bashibuzuk says:
    @Mr. Hack
    @Bashibuzuk

    a


    more confrontational China which would need RusFedian ressources to face the Globalized West...RusFed might basically end up becoming the ressource base of the Chinese – Iranian Axis.
     
    That's pretty much the way that I see it too, the way that I called at the very beginning of the war. And basically sitting out on the sidelines, sitting on their thumbs. You did catch Inozemtsev's point that it's not only sanctions that are going to kill the Russian economy, but the loss of so many intelligent and able Russian men, in the prime of their lives, that are hiding and escaping from Russia in order to not get killed in this stupid war?

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

    so many intelligent and able Russian men, in the prime of their lives, that are hiding and escaping from Russia in order to not get killed in this stupid war?

    A lot of people most fitting this description, that I know in Moscow and Piter do not support Noviop RusFedian regime. They do not support this war either. They know this war is bad for both Russians and Ukrainians. But they can do nothing against it. I am certain that a lot of highly intelligent people in Ukraine feel the same towards the Khazarian Ukiestan and this war that it had started in 2014 by using the Ukrainian nationalists as a proxy, just like the Noviop have used the Russkyi Mir militants in Donbass as a proxy.

    I have since the very beginning written that I see this war as tragedy regardless of the potential winning side. Many people among my personal acquaintances think likewise. Balto-Slav at large will gain nothing during this conflict and they might end up losing very much. We might all end up directly impacted by a nuclear war. This is all very sad and disheartening.

  492. @A123
    @YetAnotherAnon


    the AP1000 reactor design, the technology of which is now owned by China,
     
    Do you have a citation to back up that wild claim?

    What actually happened is: (1)

    Westinghouse Electric Company has emerged from Chapter 11 bankruptcy as a reorganised company after the completion yesterday of its sale by parent company Toshiba of Japan.

    Westinghouse, which supplies nuclear plant products and technologies, has been sold to Brookfield WEC Holdings, a subsidiary of Brookfield, the Canadian-listed asset management company that in January 2018 agreed to buy Westinghouse from Toshiba for $4.6bn.
     
    There is no sign of Chinese technology ownership.

    Delve slightly further, and you will find that American regulators were unwilling to allow the IP to move cross border. While the parent is up north, Brookfield WEC Holdings is located in Cranberry Township, PA.

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://www.nucnet.org/news/westinghouse-emerges-from-bankruptcy-after-completion-of-sale-to-brookfield

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon

    You are correct, but the Chinese own the IP on the various improvements they are making.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AP1000#Chinese_design_extensions

    • Replies: @A123
    @YetAnotherAnon


    You are correct, but the Chinese own the IP on the various improvements they are making.
     
    So... The CCP has IP that is valueless unless another AP1000 license is purchased. That is far from high value proposition.

    Among the key issues with the AP1000 is its size. Series 1400 and 1700 reactors would be even more unwieldy. The industry is turning to Small Modular Reactors [SMR] that can be economically manufactured at a controlled site then shipped. This sharply diminishes the onsite construction risks that plague ultra-large reactors. Also, SMR is a better for alternative cheaper fuels such as the LFTR concept.

    If a nation can get an AP1000 (or the Russian equivalent) for free... OK, taking it is a wise choice. However, the market for "full price" AP1000's is not good. After the Vogtle debacle, the risk is simply too high.

    PEACE 😇
  493. @LatW
    @Dmitry


    In Israel-Arab conflict, maybe around 50,000 people have been killed in 100 years. In Ukraine, the same number killed in 8 months. Ukraine is more violent than some of the most famous Middle East warzones.
     
    No, Dim, let's not pretend that nothing happened here. You know very well that the casualty rate is higher because there was a full scale invasion and all the Soviet made arsenal, that was collected over decades, was all of sudden expended. The carnage would've been even bigger if it wasn't for the Ukrainian air defense. It's not because of some innate Ukrainian character that this is the case, but more because of the levels of violence they have been subjected to. These people are not worse than some hipster in Moscow or some vatnik imperialist cheering the war on from his couch (oh, not anymore I guess, time to join in!).

    And there is something seriously wrong with the picture where a young man is living in his village but all of a sudden there is a foreign occupier tank in the field right next to his village, all exploded with body parts laying around. Some young men approach this kind of thing with humor, often black humor, to salvage their psyche.

    Replies: @Dmitry, @YetAnotherAnon

    My understanding is that the casualty rate was already pretty high before the invasion, when the Donbass units of the Ukrainian Armed Forces revolted after the 2014 coup, and then the UAF started retaking territory (and enacting street justice on those considered rebels/collaborators).

    The invasion has obviously upped the total casualties, but weren’t something like 14,000 civilians killed in the Donbass between 2014 and 2021?

    • Replies: @AP
    @YetAnotherAnon


    My understanding is that the casualty rate was already pretty high before the invasion, when the Donbass units of the Ukrainian Armed Forces revolted after the 2014 coup, and then the UAF started retaking territory (and enacting street justice on those considered rebels/collaborators
     
    It was 13,000 (plus 300 on that Malaysian plane) over 8 years. 10,000 military, 3,000 civilians. Much lower than Chechnya, Syria, etc. And even that can be attributed mostly to Russia. If Russia hadn’t been pouring in weapons and volunteers Ukraine would have quickly taken control of its own territory and casualties would have been minimal (a few hundred, at most a thousand or so).
  494. @Bashibuzuk
    @AP


    The Slavs defend themselves from the onslaught of the brutal Muscovite Slav-killers; they know how to fight.
     
    Oh come on AP, this is too much hyperbole even though historically some Polish nationalists saw themselves as the defenders of the Slav against the Germanized Russian Empire. RusFed is not a Russian Empire, it is a Noviop Potemkin village, a simulacre, бл☆дский цирк of a country. All it has to with Zalesskaya Rus' of Suzdal'-Vladimir's times is its geographic location. This is irrelevant, it is an equivalent to a "historical phantom limb pain".

    Novgorod was slowly, but surely evolving towards a Hanseatic dominion under Baltic Germanic patronage. This is something Soviet historians don't like to mention, but even though Alexander Nevskyi prevailed against the Teutonic and Sword-bearing Knights, the economy of Novgorod ended up dominated by Germanic merchants under the patronage of the Catholic Church. I like Novgorodian ethos, but their territory would have been lost to Rus if Muscovy wouldn't have acted so ruthlessly.

    https://statehistory.ru/books/Iosif-Kulisher_Istoriya-russkogo-narodnogo-khozyaystva/20

    About the Anglo-saxon and their Atlanticist henchmen, I agree with Fursov nearly entirely. They are the main actors of the Western Globalization since at least the eighteenth century. They have played and won the first Great Game against Russian Empire, then they pushed German Third Reich and Soviets to annihilate each other. They have won the Cold War and now they work to prevent the Chinese OBOR from ever becoming a reality. The Anglosphere thalassocracy has its modus operandi and all that what was happening in RusFed and Ukiestan territories for at least the last two generations is fitting entirely into this pattern.

    BTW, today both RusFedian Ministry of Defence and Foreign Affairs have directly accused the UK special services of being behind the Nord Stream attacks. I am not surprised in the slightest. As ataman Krasnov said just before being handed to Soviet killers in Lienz: "Опять Ангичанка гадит ?".

    https://www.warhistoryonline.com/war-articles/lienz-cossacks.html

    https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/britains-cossack-betrayal/

    As long as Balto-Slav are ready to kill each other, the Anglo-saxon will be happy to oblige and provide guidance and weapons. Then they will reap the bloody harvest (they already started, just see the record gains of the British and American oil and gas industries). It's business only, nothing personal. As usual...

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @S

    RusFed is not a Russian Empire, it is a Noviop Potemkin village, a simulacre, бл☆дский цирк of a country. All it has to with Zalesskaya Rus’ of Suzdal’-Vladimir’s times is its geographic location.

    I’m not sure that I buy this. Trying to disassociate Russia with its historic past is untenable, otherwise all the countries of the world should do the same. All countries change over time, their boundaries change, their needs and visions for the future change, even their language changes. Russia had a long period of time as an empire (centuries), most even attribute the soviet period to this process. Most would attribute Putin’s fanatical attempts to reabsorb Ukraine under Russian dominion as just another rung in the latter to finish the job, and really reassume Russia’s place in the world as a true empire. Blaming “RusFed’s” disastrous war against Ukraine on conspiracy theories, where outside Western sources are controlling Putler’s war moves, as some sort of grand marionette play, can only be taken so far…with a grain of salt.

    • Replies: @Bashibuzuk
    @Mr. Hack

    Mr Hack, the nation states and Empires are already obsolete bordering on derelict, when compared to the forces of Globalization. Russia is just one of the most advanced in its decadence. US and Europe will end up the same or worse.

    Russians have experienced Communism, which is an extreme form of leftist internationalist Globalization, first hand and for three generations. In the Globalist West (including its Extreme Orient dominions), it has been ongoing since perhaps a couple of generations or less and in a less extreme leftist manner. The Globalist still use nations and historical countries in the West as decoys, just like a parasitic wasp uses a paralyzed insect to inoculate its larvae.

    The results in the West fill end up being as bad or even worse as they were in Sovok. Plus mass control techniques and surveillance state have evolved much further beyond anything CheKa / NKVD / KGB might have dreamed of. We already live in a soft totalitarian society. Has it anything to do with the will of the Founding Fathers in US ? I think it doesn't.

    In the same vein, RusFed has nothing to do with the Holy Rus / Third Rome / Russian Empire. It is just a mafia state which job was to pump both ressources and moneys towards the Globalized Western economies and financial institutions. It went rogue and turned on its handlers. It is being punished right now, while the Chinese OBOR Globalization project is being kept in check.

    Coconut mentioned Archeofuturism, perhaps inspired by the late Guillaume Faye, the World is possibly indeed moving in that direction. Barbarossa mentioned clans and tribes, he is probably right. We have to move back to more natural patterns of organization to ensure our bloodlines' survival.

    I am done with the nation state simulacra, they're used to fool and distract us. They're shadows of the past glory, unreal and used by our enemies to hide behind.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

  495. @YetAnotherAnon
    @LatW

    My understanding is that the casualty rate was already pretty high before the invasion, when the Donbass units of the Ukrainian Armed Forces revolted after the 2014 coup, and then the UAF started retaking territory (and enacting street justice on those considered rebels/collaborators).

    The invasion has obviously upped the total casualties, but weren't something like 14,000 civilians killed in the Donbass between 2014 and 2021?

    Replies: @AP

    My understanding is that the casualty rate was already pretty high before the invasion, when the Donbass units of the Ukrainian Armed Forces revolted after the 2014 coup, and then the UAF started retaking territory (and enacting street justice on those considered rebels/collaborators

    It was 13,000 (plus 300 on that Malaysian plane) over 8 years. 10,000 military, 3,000 civilians. Much lower than Chechnya, Syria, etc. And even that can be attributed mostly to Russia. If Russia hadn’t been pouring in weapons and volunteers Ukraine would have quickly taken control of its own territory and casualties would have been minimal (a few hundred, at most a thousand or so).

  496. Bashibuzuk says:
    @Mr. Hack
    @Bashibuzuk


    RusFed is not a Russian Empire, it is a Noviop Potemkin village, a simulacre, бл☆дский цирк of a country. All it has to with Zalesskaya Rus’ of Suzdal’-Vladimir’s times is its geographic location.
     
    I'm not sure that I buy this. Trying to disassociate Russia with its historic past is untenable, otherwise all the countries of the world should do the same. All countries change over time, their boundaries change, their needs and visions for the future change, even their language changes. Russia had a long period of time as an empire (centuries), most even attribute the soviet period to this process. Most would attribute Putin's fanatical attempts to reabsorb Ukraine under Russian dominion as just another rung in the latter to finish the job, and really reassume Russia's place in the world as a true empire. Blaming "RusFed's" disastrous war against Ukraine on conspiracy theories, where outside Western sources are controlling Putler's war moves, as some sort of grand marionette play, can only be taken so far...with a grain of salt.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

    Mr Hack, the nation states and Empires are already obsolete bordering on derelict, when compared to the forces of Globalization. Russia is just one of the most advanced in its decadence. US and Europe will end up the same or worse.

    Russians have experienced Communism, which is an extreme form of leftist internationalist Globalization, first hand and for three generations. In the Globalist West (including its Extreme Orient dominions), it has been ongoing since perhaps a couple of generations or less and in a less extreme leftist manner. The Globalist still use nations and historical countries in the West as decoys, just like a parasitic wasp uses a paralyzed insect to inoculate its larvae.

    The results in the West fill end up being as bad or even worse as they were in Sovok. Plus mass control techniques and surveillance state have evolved much further beyond anything CheKa / NKVD / KGB might have dreamed of. We already live in a soft totalitarian society. Has it anything to do with the will of the Founding Fathers in US ? I think it doesn’t.

    In the same vein, RusFed has nothing to do with the Holy Rus / Third Rome / Russian Empire. It is just a mafia state which job was to pump both ressources and moneys towards the Globalized Western economies and financial institutions. It went rogue and turned on its handlers. It is being punished right now, while the Chinese OBOR Globalization project is being kept in check.

    Coconut mentioned Archeofuturism, perhaps inspired by the late Guillaume Faye, the World is possibly indeed moving in that direction. Barbarossa mentioned clans and tribes, he is probably right. We have to move back to more natural patterns of organization to ensure our bloodlines’ survival.

    I am done with the nation state simulacra, they’re used to fool and distract us. They’re shadows of the past glory, unreal and used by our enemies to hide behind.

    • Agree: Barbarossa
    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @Bashibuzuk

    I appreciate this very succinct answer of yours that clearly spells out your beliefs about the world's future trajectory.

    I do have some doubts about a return to human reorganization based on a model of past clannish behavior. These models, after all, were already prominent in the past and went on to form larger organizational units including nations, states and empires. Larger and larger organizational units forming, until we now have the ever present and expanding models of globalism. The only way that I can see a reversal back to models based on tribes etc, is if apocalyptic scenarios evolve where survival is based upon the organization of smaller mixed ethnic/racial groups who chose to band together to survive. a sort of Mad Max sort of scenario. The trends seem to point to the linking together of nation/states into larger and larger groupings for various reasons.

    Ubiquitous travel amongst individuals to all corners of the world for business and educational (and recreational) purposes has helped to break down the walls of the past. World wide communication via television, radio and the internet has done its fair share in eroding man made borders too. I don't see your children that have been brought up in France or AP's children that have grown up in the US ever returning to either Russia or Ukraine to take part in some sort of "more natural patterns of organization to ensure our bloodlines’ survival." Do you...really? With all due respect, it doesn't seem possible?

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

  497. Bashibuzuk says:

    Meanwhile in South Korea:

    At least 120 people died, and more than 100 were seriously injured after a catastrophic crowd-crushing incident unfolded at a Halloween festival in Seoul’s South Korean capital on Saturday night.

    The mass casualty incident occurred in the Itaewon area of Seoul.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/scariest-halloween-my-life-120-dead-south-korea-after-crowd-crushing-incident

    The final dead count might reach 200.

    While the emergency services took care of the dead and the wounded, a couple of blocks away the party went on with DJs playing sets and young people dancing as if nothing happened.

    Given its abysmal birthrates and this kind of occurrences can we call South Korea a Death Cult (serious question) ?

    • Replies: @YetAnotherAnon
    @Bashibuzuk

    Deaths up to 146. Not good.

  498. @Bashibuzuk
    Meanwhile in South Korea:

    At least 120 people died, and more than 100 were seriously injured after a catastrophic crowd-crushing incident unfolded at a Halloween festival in Seoul's South Korean capital on Saturday night.

    The mass casualty incident occurred in the Itaewon area of Seoul.
     

    https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/scariest-halloween-my-life-120-dead-south-korea-after-crowd-crushing-incident

    The final dead count might reach 200.

    While the emergency services took care of the dead and the wounded, a couple of blocks away the party went on with DJs playing sets and young people dancing as if nothing happened.

    Given its abysmal birthrates and this kind of occurrences can we call South Korea a Death Cult (serious question) ?

    Replies: @YetAnotherAnon

    Deaths up to 146. Not good.

    • Agree: Bashibuzuk
  499. @AP
    @Dmitry


    Well you reminded me of the old thread and posts. https://www.unz.com/akarlin/sixth-proof/#comment-3206911 AP believes people who are victims of history, are “punished by God”. So, his Hindu religious views
     
    Why Hindu? As you know, locals in Rus blamed sin for the Mongol catastrophe. They were not Hindus.

    The non-Christian, Soviet parts of Ukraine is being most devastated by Putin. Meanwhile there is a real estate boom in the West, despite occasional blackouts now:

    https://i.imgur.com/Hhq0U2E.png

    The misery in the East is sad and terrible of course. It is a tragedy, nothing to celebrate.

    In real world, most Ukrainians are not directly responsible for this disaster, neither most Russians.
     
    Ukrainians certainly are not, because Ukraine did not invade other countries but was invaded.

    On the other hand, both Putin and the war are popular among Russians so they bear responsibility. Is it because you are from Russia that you try to muddy this clear issue?

    You’re living on a volcano
     
    Russians elected and reelected Putin and polls consistently show that Russians support the war. The support is starting to decline because Russians are dying in larger numbers but this just means Russians don't like to lose their own lives, but don't mind killing Ukrainians.

    Yes, not all Russians, but the majority.

    Still, either you believe there should be protection of refugees or not. You can’t say “protect refugees when they are from my nationality I have connected my ego to”, but at the same time say it is a sign of Western decay when those refugees “are not my nationality”
     
    Why?

    Replies: @Dmitry

    Why Hindu? As you know

    Sure, Hindu is a religion with sophisticated theology, which I would not insult. Your views seem more like something Aztec or belief in rain gods.

    there is a real estate boom in the West

    So, you would believe the area which experiences this property boom and asset increase are therefore becoming further from entering the Kingdom of Heaven, in the New Testament.

    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Mark%2010:24-26&version=KJ21
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=James+5%3A1-5&version=ESV
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=James+2%3A5&version=ESV
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke+1%3A53&version=ESV
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke+6%3A20-21&version=ESV
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke+12%3A33

    is being most devastated by

    Being most devastated, suffering and persecuted is not indicator of unrighteousness, in the New Testament teaching. It’s not Hinduism or belief in rain gods. Cross is a symbol of suffering.

    If you have a comfortable time, with none persecuting you, without suffering, this is the time you would be worried as you do not carry the cross, as precondition for anyone who follows Jesus is carrying a Cross and having persecutions, as they write constantly.

    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew%2010:37-39&version=KJ21
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2+Timothy+3%3A12-12&version=NIV
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1+Peter+4%3A13-14&version=AMP

    Putin and polls consistently show that Russians support the war.

    And the polls in Cuba, will show Cuba has the best healthcare system in the world.

    Putin.. are popular among Russians

    You were promoting him to us. https://www.unz.com/akarlin/russias-nationalist-turn/#comment-4928594

    Why?

    Mainly Western Europeans are supporting the refugees, whether you think this is a good idea or not from the political view, because they feel compassion for the victims of the war (although of course there is also some virtue signaling there). It’s morality for them and for this reason doesn’t match exactly following of rational self-interest.

    And whether you agree with him or not, for Jesus (which is a part of the cultural basis for Western Europe), he emphasized especially help of the outsider who is specifically from not your tribe or religion. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke%2010%3A25-37&version=NIV

    Morality is a separate topic than self-promotion of your tribe, grifting, supporting your perceived self-interest, smelling your own farts.

    • Replies: @Bashibuzuk
    @Dmitry


    Morality is a separate topic than self-promotion of your tribe, grifting, supporting your perceived self-interest, smelling your own farts.
     
    He might want to correct me if I am wrong, but I am under the subjective impression that for AP (with his Greco-Catholic upbringing in a Patrician Polish-Galician lineage) Christianity is more about its beautiful cathedrals and the fine arts of Christendom's advanced cultures, than about Russian Orthodoxy Fools for Christ (во Христе Юродивые).

    https://blogs.ancientfaith.com/easternchristianinsights/2016/01/24/become-holy-fool-homily-saint-xenia-st-petersburg-fool-christ/

    It is more about human achievement, than human suffering. More about what we gain and less about what we must lose to get lighter to fly closer to God.



    OTOH each of those wretched and gone astray in Downtown Eastside Vancouver have the God's Light in them, all of them Human, all of them Guilty and all of them Innocent.

    May their own suffering and suffering they cause to others bring them closer to final Enlightenment and everlasting Peace. For when we suffer not, we tend to become self-righteous and self-absorbed.

    One needs to read Moscow - Petushki by Venechka Yerofeev to better understand this point.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moscow-Petushki

    Or listen to this beautiful song by Nine Inch Nails in its gorgeous cover by Johnny Cash (who after all was himself a firm believer and a warm receiver).

    https://youtu.be/8AHCfZTRGiI

    Replies: @Dmitry

    , @AP
    @Dmitry


    Your views seem more like something Aztec or belief in rain gods
     
    Aztec demons demanded mass human sacrifice of innocents.

    Terrible things happen to communities because they have collectively engaged in sin.

    How are these similar?

    Medieval Christians explained the Mongol invasion as a divine punishment for sins.

    So, you would believe the area which experiences this property boom and asset increase are therefore becoming further from entering the Kingdom of Heaven, in the New Testament
     
    I do not belong to a Protestant sect that believes the Bible is more important than the Church. One can quote passages to support all kinds of claims but the Church has different conclusions:

    https://www.goarch.org/-/orthodox-christian-wealth-and-stewardship

    Putin and polls consistently show that Russians support the war.

    And the polls in Cuba, will show Cuba has the best healthcare system in the world
     
    Do Cubans think so? Because most Russians do like Putin and do support the war. This support has eroded only because Russians are experiencing mass mobilization. This means that most Russians didn’t mind invading Ukraine and slaughtering its people but they mind getting killed themselves.

    Putin.. are popular among Russians

    You were promoting him to us
     
    Until he started the invasion and mass killing of Ukrainians. Russians still like him though.

    “is being most devastated by”

    Being most devastated, suffering and persecuted is not indicator of unrighteousness, in the New Testament teaching

     

    It suggests a need to suffer in order to expunge one’s sins. A community that has fallen into sin is in greater need to “carry a cross” than one that has not. It is an opportunity for redemption.

    When the Holy Inquisition burned heretics it was for the purpose of their salvation.

    Religious Catholics who suffer chronic pain will often find meaning in their experience by viewing it as an opportunity to pay for their sins and thereby reduce their stay in purgatory. This does not necessarily mean that they were bad people personally. We are mortal and will die as a consequence of the original sin.

    Replies: @silviosilver, @Dmitry

  500. Bashibuzuk says:

    The death of the Korean young revelers so close to the Samhuinn’s eve brought me to the thoughts and interrogations I have always had about human sacrifice in ancient times.

    My understanding is most ancient cultures both valued human life, believed in the afterlife and practiced human sacrifices. While we usually see it as archaic and barbaric, the death during a human sacrifice was probably no more absurd that a death by fentanyl overdose, car accident or suicide because someone’s life didn’t go as planned.

    [MORE]

    https://www.irishcentral.com/roots/history/ancient-celts-human-sacrifice
    Probably in the future too human life and death in a potential posthuman civilization would be at the same time significant and absurd.

    We will always wander through life and death, clinging and then letting go in the end. It is part of human nature.

    May those who died in Seoul today find peace eternal.

    Gate, gate, paragate, parasamgate, Bodhi ! Svaha !

    • Thanks: Barbarossa
  501. Bashibuzuk says:
    @Dmitry
    @AP


    Why Hindu? As you know
     
    Sure, Hindu is a religion with sophisticated theology, which I would not insult. Your views seem more like something Aztec or belief in rain gods.

    there is a real estate boom in the West
     
    So, you would believe the area which experiences this property boom and asset increase are therefore becoming further from entering the Kingdom of Heaven, in the New Testament.

    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Mark%2010:24-26&version=KJ21
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=James+5%3A1-5&version=ESV
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=James+2%3A5&version=ESV
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke+1%3A53&version=ESV
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke+6%3A20-21&version=ESV
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke+12%3A33


    is being most devastated by

     

    Being most devastated, suffering and persecuted is not indicator of unrighteousness, in the New Testament teaching. It's not Hinduism or belief in rain gods. Cross is a symbol of suffering.

    If you have a comfortable time, with none persecuting you, without suffering, this is the time you would be worried as you do not carry the cross, as precondition for anyone who follows Jesus is carrying a Cross and having persecutions, as they write constantly.

    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew%2010:37-39&version=KJ21
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2+Timothy+3%3A12-12&version=NIV
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1+Peter+4%3A13-14&version=AMP


    Putin and polls consistently show that Russians support the war.
     
    And the polls in Cuba, will show Cuba has the best healthcare system in the world.

    Putin.. are popular among Russians
     
    You were promoting him to us. https://www.unz.com/akarlin/russias-nationalist-turn/#comment-4928594

    Why?

     

    Mainly Western Europeans are supporting the refugees, whether you think this is a good idea or not from the political view, because they feel compassion for the victims of the war (although of course there is also some virtue signaling there). It's morality for them and for this reason doesn't match exactly following of rational self-interest.

    And whether you agree with him or not, for Jesus (which is a part of the cultural basis for Western Europe), he emphasized especially help of the outsider who is specifically from not your tribe or religion. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke%2010%3A25-37&version=NIV

    Morality is a separate topic than self-promotion of your tribe, grifting, supporting your perceived self-interest, smelling your own farts.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk, @AP

    Morality is a separate topic than self-promotion of your tribe, grifting, supporting your perceived self-interest, smelling your own farts.

    He might want to correct me if I am wrong, but I am under the subjective impression that for AP (with his Greco-Catholic upbringing in a Patrician Polish-Galician lineage) Christianity is more about its beautiful cathedrals and the fine arts of Christendom’s advanced cultures, than about Russian Orthodoxy Fools for Christ (во Христе Юродивые).

    https://blogs.ancientfaith.com/easternchristianinsights/2016/01/24/become-holy-fool-homily-saint-xenia-st-petersburg-fool-christ/

    It is more about human achievement, than human suffering. More about what we gain and less about what we must lose to get lighter to fly closer to God.

    [MORE]

    OTOH each of those wretched and gone astray in Downtown Eastside Vancouver have the God’s Light in them, all of them Human, all of them Guilty and all of them Innocent.

    May their own suffering and suffering they cause to others bring them closer to final Enlightenment and everlasting Peace. For when we suffer not, we tend to become self-righteous and self-absorbed.

    One needs to read Moscow – Petushki by Venechka Yerofeev to better understand this point.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moscow-Petushki

    Or listen to this beautiful song by Nine Inch Nails in its gorgeous cover by Johnny Cash (who after all was himself a firm believer and a warm receiver).

    • Replies: @Dmitry
    @Bashibuzuk


    more about its beautiful cathedrals and the fine arts of
     
    Yes this is part of the view, although it is quite mainstream for Americans (unlike raingod view of karma).

    It is stereotypical 20th century disneyland view of Europe, where many immigrants in America want to connect to their ego an idealized world of princesses and castles. I'm not sure it was common in the 19th century, but definitely it is available in 20th century American culture, perhaps emerging partly like compensation while their country was being converted to a bit of disenchanted highway.

    Because immigrants in America could boast their ego in the 20th century with an idealized Disneyland view of Europe of princesses and castles, then it will be inevitable parts of African American culture responded by imagining they were descended from Kings of Egypt and build the pyramids.

    Because we all have the same temptation from ego to pretend they are a special snowflake and 20th century American culture has perhaps lacked the message that it is better to resist your ego, perhaps as teaching too much humility and anti-idealization, was not very aligned with retail and advertising.

    Pride is the most anti-Christian thing, as the original and greatest sin is pride. And pride for your own attainments might be weak enough, but pride for things which are not related to your life (like pride that someone has constructed a large cathedral in Europe a thousand years before you were born) would be especially against the teaching in the New Testament, if you know them.
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Philippians+2%3A1-8&version=AMPC

    Downtown Eastside Vancouver have the God’s Light in them
     
    And unlike the people in the skyscrapers of Vancouver, they would be lacking at least the difficulty of being a camel trying to go through the eye of the needle, from the view of the bible.

    , all of them Human, all of them Guilty and all of them Innocent.

     

    We're now becoming some kind of evangelists walking reading quotes from the bible, but yes the teaching of the bible.
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1+Corinthians+1:27-29
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=James+2%3A2-6

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk, @Wokechoke

  502. @YetAnotherAnon
    @A123

    You are correct, but the Chinese own the IP on the various improvements they are making.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AP1000#Chinese_design_extensions

    Replies: @A123

    You are correct, but the Chinese own the IP on the various improvements they are making.

    So… The CCP has IP that is valueless unless another AP1000 license is purchased. That is far from high value proposition.

    Among the key issues with the AP1000 is its size. Series 1400 and 1700 reactors would be even more unwieldy. The industry is turning to Small Modular Reactors [SMR] that can be economically manufactured at a controlled site then shipped. This sharply diminishes the onsite construction risks that plague ultra-large reactors. Also, SMR is a better for alternative cheaper fuels such as the LFTR concept.

    If a nation can get an AP1000 (or the Russian equivalent) for free… OK, taking it is a wise choice. However, the market for “full price” AP1000’s is not good. After the Vogtle debacle, the risk is simply too high.

    PEACE 😇

  503. @Bashibuzuk
    @LatW

    https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2022/09/poland-will-have-a-large-and-modern-tank-army.html

    Poland is preparing to fight RusFed in the Baltics and Ukraine. Poland intends to become the focal point for the assembly of the Intermarium.

    The Intermarium is put in place to prevent the economic connectivity between Old Europe (France, Italy, Germany...) and China through the territories currently controlled, or in the case of Belarus, influenced by the RusFed.

    Old Europe is being sacrificed by the Atlanticist branch of the Globalist to prevent the appearance of the Eurasian economic and military superpower in which China and Old Europe would be the major stakeholders, with RusFed, Iran and Turkey being the minor ones.

    Poland is gambling to become an additional major stakeholder in this geopolitical situation that will define the first half of the twenty-first century in Eurasia. It plays the role of the Atlanticist redoubt in Europe (Fort Trump for G-d's sake...)

    Poland is playing its hand as usual, in a somewhat demonstrative manner. They could have ordered their main battle tanks and other military upgrades in Old Europe, but they didn't. By choosing to proceed that way they (over ?) emphasize their independence and what they see as their growing clout in the Eurasian affairs.

    As usual, Poland might end up punching above their weight. It has happened before and we know how it usually ends when it happens. Old Europe will not go gentle into that good night, it might well push Poland towards a direct confrontational with the RusFed in Ukraine, Belarus and the Baltics, and then backstab it when the going gets tough.

    https://www.thenationalnews.com/world/europe/2022/10/13/france-wont-retaliate-with-nuclear-weapons-if-russia-uses-them-in-ukraine/

    That would be some burden sharing all right: Poland and the Baltics would shoulder the burden, fall when backstabbed, and do some sharing with Germany clawing its lost historical territories back.

    Then OBOR would go through RusFed, Belarus and the German Baltic territories (including Königsberg) with the Nord Stream pipelines magically spirited back to life.

    That would allow for the birth of Eurasia from Dublin to Vladivostok with Han Chinese characteristics. China and Old Europe would have won this round of the Great Game 2.0.

    https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3197667/german-chancellor-olaf-scholz-visit-china-next-week

    https://ic.pics.livejournal.com/fon_eichwald/43081844/57393/57393_640.jpg

    Expectations...

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/aa/Poland_can_into_Wikipedia.jpg

    Reality... ?

    🙂

    Replies: @Beckow, @Mr. Hack, @Wokechoke, @AP, @LatW

    Thank you for your intelligent comment, as usual, it is good to be able to read an alternative view.

    Poland is preparing to fight RusFed in the Baltics and Ukraine. Poland intends to become the focal point for the assembly of the Intermarium.

    Well, everyone will fight together, hopefully, if RusFed manages to attack. Now or in 20 or 30 years, either way. Frankly, it’s about time that Poland (and the region in general) started thinking about its military, to go for 30 years without a serious military in this region is a luxury. That vacuum needed to be filled. Finland, for example, had a good relationship with Russia because it could always lean on their military and reserves.

    The Intermarium is put in place to prevent the economic connectivity between Old Europe (France, Italy, Germany…) and China through the territories currently controlled, or in the case of Belarus, influenced by the RusFed.

    Of course, one can always read it that way, but the original idea of the Intermarium originated as an attempt to defend the region from both sides. The original ideas were developed already in the 1920s (in fact, even during the Civil War in the Russian Empire, interestingly, some of the founding ideologues of the Intermarium actually fought alongside with the Whites). At that time neither the US, nor China were as prominent as they are today. (Yes, Britain was, but not to the extent to manage the whole region).

    [MORE]

    As to the economic connectivity, before 2020 and within the security arrangement that lasted until 2022, the trade between the EU and Russia was increasing, Russia’s export structure was starting to change from just raw material to more of actual product and Ukraine, too, started trading more. Everyone was benefiting. Had the RusFed not made the ultimatum in December 2021, this would have continued to everyone’s benefit (despite the problems started in 2014).

    Also, looking further back into the past, some of the pipelines were closed by Russia for political reasons already in the 1990s (due to the Karaganov doctrine to use energy as a political tool). It didn’t have to happen (I doubt there was some strict diktat from the US or UK to close those pipes, that came from the RusFed side).

    Old Europe is being sacrificed by the Atlanticist branch of the Globalist to prevent the appearance of the Eurasian economic and military superpower in which China and Old Europe would be the major stakeholders, with RusFed, Iran and Turkey being the minor ones.

    These kinds of projects of massive global scale (same as the USSR), in order to work, need to be created in a way that every participant’s interests are protected and their needs are met. Not through domination because that doesn’t work on the micro level. When you invite large stakeholders such as China, you need to consider everyone’s interests. Not just interests of German businesses or Russian / Chinese oligarchs.

    Poland is gambling to become an additional major stakeholder in this geopolitical situation that will define the first half of the twenty-first century in Eurasia.

    Poland wants peace in the region so it can continue to thrive. Poland et al want a space where their own can develop, where they themselves are given priority and not outsiders (who ever they may be).

    They could have ordered their main battle tanks and other military upgrades in Old Europe, but they didn’t. By choosing to proceed that way they (over ?) emphasize their independence and what they see as their growing clout in the Eurasian affairs.

    The military equipment is sourced from several countries that are the main global producers. Germany, US, Israel, South Korea, Sweden, Finland, Turkey, those being the top producers of the best weapons and there is a limited number of producers who can deliver the required amount in a limited time frame for the best price. Germany put her military production on the back burner for many years and Germany is also reluctant to sell for political reasons (which is understandable). Afaik, the German tanks are also more expensive and not as readily available.

    As usual, Poland might end up punching above their weight. It has happened before and we know how it usually ends when it happens. Old Europe will not go gentle into that good night, it might well push Poland towards a direct confrontational with the RusFed in Ukraine, Belarus and the Baltics, and then backstab it when the going gets tough

    .

    We don’t know how the chips will fall. One must learn from history and it is certainly tempting to draw these comparisons, but, as Heraclitus said, you cannot step in the same river twice, panta rei – everything flows, everything is in a flux, everything is a struggle.

    As to direct confrontation with RusFed (let’s hope that doesn’t happen), if there are more attacks on Western Ukraine, the kind that have already happened and if they escalate, that objectively becomes a big problem for Poland (and even Romania). RusFed could’ve stayed in Donbas (plus Belarus), but they decided to push further, much further (see the terms of the ultimatum). They decided to push for more than they can take.

    In the longer perspective, hopefully, there is one more chance to make up with Russia. The odds are low, but if there is even as little as 1% possibility, it should be used.

    That would allow for the birth of Eurasia from Dublin to Vladivostok with Han Chinese characteristics.

    Did you ask the Dubliners (will their job be to provide Guinness?) and the Siberians? As to Han Chinese characteristics, if that’s what the majority of Russians want… alas, it’s their land.

    And just a note about money. Poland is now Germany’s 5th largest trading partner (Poland recently surpassed Italy that way), so their trade volumes are consistently high. Germany doesn’t object.

    • Replies: @Bashibuzuk
    @LatW


    As to the economic connectivity, before 2020 and within the security arrangement that lasted until 2022, the trade between the EU and Russia was increasing, Russia’s export structure was starting to change from just raw material to more of actual product and Ukraine, too, started trading more. Everyone was benefiting. Had the RusFed not made the ultimatum in December 2021, this would have continued to everyone’s benefit (despite the problems started in 2014).
     
    I think this is precisely why this whole thing happened. The Great Reset is about causing economic downturn during the fourth industrial revolution transition to preserve the limited natural ressources for those future generations of genetic lineages whom will get past the current population bottleneck, while NATO is of course about "keeping Germans down, keeping Russians out and keeping Americans in". Combine both and you get the picture.

    We have two global projects for the posthuman/transhuman future of mankind: the ones of the Chinese elites and the Globalized West elites. Only one of these projects will prevail.

    RusFed tried to ride on both trains and sit on both chairs at once. As usual with Pynya, it was more about indecision than about strategic ambivalence (RusFed has no strategy it is led by Noviops who only do tactical moves).

    So after 2012 and Pynya's coming back and clinging to power, the Globalized West has chosen to act in order to prevent both Ukraine and RusFed from either emerging as a unified economic space and/or joining OBOR. Remember that offers of "Reset" in US and RusFed relations have been made to Medvedev and seemingly moved forward until Pynya came back. Possibly, the 2008 financial and the 2012 economic crisis also did not help. A sense of urgency might have prevailed among the Atlanticist elite back then during the Maidan.


    These kinds of projects of massive global scale (same as the USSR), in order to work, need to be created in a way that every participant’s interests are protected and their needs are met. Not through domination because that doesn’t work on the micro level. When you invite large stakeholders such as China, you need to consider everyone’s interests. Not just interests of German businesses or Russian / Chinese oligarchs.
     
    These massive projects actually all end up in the way of the Babel Tower, they crumble while the multitudes that built them divide and dissolve. That is unless and until it remains held together by brute force and/or very strong metaphysics. Elites always think that their attempt is different and cannot be compared to the historical records, but since times immemorial it always ends the same. There will be no Heaven on Earth built by Elites' Decree.

    Poland wants peace in the region so it can continue to thrive. Poland et al want a space where their own can develop, where they themselves are given priority and not outsiders (who ever they may be).
     
    Poland and others in the region have an axe to grind with those who have dominated them in the past. It is the result of both a national trauma and a national superiority complex. When Poles are honest, they usually recognize as much. I had a couple of Polish friends with whom I got along rather well (we had a similar type of humor) and they candidly admitted that when it comes to Russians they have a hard time remaining rational. Interestingly enough, it is not the case at all in RusFed where people have a very balanced attitude towards Poland, and if educated enough usually appreciate Polish literature, movies and music. Im general, Russians usually do not see Poles or Balts as inferior or inherently hostile.

    The military equipment is sourced from several countries that are the main global producers. Germany, US, Israel, South Korea, Sweden, Finland, Turkey, those being the top producers of the best weapons and there is a limited number of producers who can deliver the required amount in a limited time frame for the best price. Germany put her military production on the back burner for many years and Germany is also reluctant to sell for political reasons (which is understandable). Afaik, the German tanks are also more expensive and not as readily available.
     
    Sure, but they get their subsidies' moneys from EU, mostly from Western European's taxpayers taxes or the inflation that all the EU citizens have to absorb when EU Central Banks print moneys out of thin air. They should promote and prefer EU industries and EU countries MIC. But they buy Korean or in the case of future nuclear stations American companies. It is not the way old EC used to work when they built Airbus or other great European industries. It is as if Eastern Euros are here for the subsidies, but not for the economic cooperation that might favor Old Europe. It is a selfish attitude.

    We don’t know how the chips will fall. One must learn from history and it is certainly tempting to draw these comparisons, but, as Heraclitus said, you cannot step in the same river twice, panta rei – everything flows, everything is in a flux, everything is a struggle.
     
    Agreed.

    Did you ask the Dubliners (will their job be to provide Guinness?) and the Siberians? As to Han Chinese characteristics, if that’s what the majority of Russians want… alas, it’s their land.
     
    Nobody wants this, but it might occur nevertheless. As I wrote earlier, we have to choose between two Globalist projects. The Chinese is one of those.

    Poland is now Germany’s 5th largest trading partner (Poland recently surpassed Italy that way), so their trade volumes are consistently high. Germany doesn’t object.
     
    The problem is not economic, but political. Germany doesn't have to be dictated by Poland or Eastern European EU members in general. Old Europe will not stand it. Eastern European EU members might end up learning it the hard way.

    Replies: @LatW, @Barbarossa, @Beckow

  504. @Dmitry
    @Coconuts


    unconvinced of the value of an achievement like this. Isn’t it like making the status of elite country dependent on where comprador elites
     
    It's not only positive for the locals to receive the world's super wealthy population (for example, increase in property costs), but from the information point of view, there is a healthy symptom for the country, when you see people want to build a life in the country, or store the wealth there, as it depends on the political stability, safety, legal system, property rights.

    Wealthy Chinese are moving their family to Vancouver, partly because they view Canada as a better place to build their life, have family future and property. This is an indicator that Canada has a more stable legal system, more habitable society, as there are more than a hundred thousand millionaires voting to move there.

    We live in a century where, because of technology (transport technology in the most basic level) and economic structure, a significant portion of the world's population will move between countries. So, even while you can dislike the moving of people, globalization that will only increase this century, the regions people move is showing information about real differences in life in these countries with the sense of Francis Galton's "wisdom of crowds".

    Often there is shown to be preference to move to countries with anglosaxon political and legal origin which could be seen as a view of the best long-term stability. Australia, USA, UK, New Zealand, Singapore, Canada, Australia.


    Given the highly wealthy minority are likely to produce a disproportionate portion of this GDP, the low productivity
     
    Well this would sound like "Brazilification", with a wealthy elite increasing their control of the economy.

    But UK is not Brazil, it has many of the most advanced industries, most educated people, talented engineers, scientific success etc. The immigration is not only contrary for this, as many of the world's skilled workers are trying to go there.

    Also the origin of the wealth, of the wealthy immigrants, is not usually from the local ecoomy.


    Will Germany continue to be as elite in the future?
     
    Who knows the future? Maybe Thulean Friend has some more economic knowledge to predict this.

    But for the GDP, the Western European countries are closely matching. The last decade has been stagnation in all these countries. But Germany, France and UK only had stagnation, while Italy and Spain could be declining.

    https://i.imgur.com/H2Y8s3L.jpg

    Replies: @Coconuts

    We live in a century where, because of technology (transport technology in the most basic level) and economic structure, a significant portion of the world’s population will move between countries. So, even while you can dislike the moving of people, globalization that will only increase this century, the regions people move is showing information about real differences in life in these countries with the sense of Francis Galton’s “wisdom of crowds”.

    I remember hearing a French Marxist economist (iirc) sketch this out 20 years ago, he seems to have predicted things with some accuracy. But, increasing concentration and centralisation of capital combined with growing importance of a minority of experts/technocrats doesn’t seem to be necessarily the best solution for overall development of a population, even if it is inevitable. There are benefits from being in a country with a lot of very rich people and some of the foremost world technocrats, but it means the lives of the rest of the population are likely to become both highly dependent on and controlled by this international elite. This other part of the population has relatively low value except in their capacity of service to those who control this accumulation of financial wealth and expertise; they can always be replaced by immigrants from poorer parts of the world.

    [MORE]

    It doesn’t seem surprising that if more highly wealthy people and high productivity experts move into the UK, more of wealth production and GDP will be down to them (I guess earnings from the wealth they place in British banks and its management will count as UK GDP). Demographic change may explain future low productivity in the other parts of the population as the current segments of it with low educational attainment grow in relative number.

    This is why in the future some more average European person may prefer to live in a country more like Poland, where wealth production is more widely shared through the population and there won’t be this level of stratification combined with significant ethnic diversity.

    • Replies: @Dmitry
    @Coconuts


    very rich people and some of the foremost world technocrats, but it means the lives of the rest of the population are likely to become both highly dependent

     

    It could even be negative effects for the country to receive the wealthy immigrants. I'm not saying it is negative, but it is possible that it could be negative net. But I'm saying movement of those people to the country, is an indicator of positive aspects of the country, such as the stable legal and political system.

    Animals are responding before there is an earthquake. Rich people are moving from what feels like more unstable ground to more stable ground. It's when you see the rich people are emigrating from your country that you know you are going to be in problems soon. Rich people are not usually stupid. Sometimes they know more than we.

    Poland, where wealth production is more widely shared through the population
     
    UK has many world level companies of the native origin and has a lot of the local entrepreneur culture with its engineers. English are some of the best engineers in the world, the most talented inventors.

    Whereas in Poland, the successful companies, are mainly foreign like Volkswagen, Lidl, Tesco. There isn't much of local industry of world class in areas I know (perhaps there is something who knows more than my superficial opinion).

    Poland is going to be coupled as junior to Germany, which is not the worse situation, depending how Germany's economy will be. But you know being dependent for foreign companies.

    productivity in the other parts of the population as the current segments of it with low educational attainment grow in relative number.

     

    Except America, the highest level of education is in UK. Although there are problems like stagnating proportion of GDP for R&D. Still the best universities and researchers outside USA are in UK. British have order of magnitude more Nobel prizes in science than countries like Poland.

    If you consider the problems of globalization and technological dystopia. Perhaps it is a plane which might be crashing. But the countries which are more likely to survive, will be closer to the pilot, where you will know about the problems first, understand the system from inside.

    Modernity is maybe going to destroy everyone. We are all going to have problems. But the people near the pilot have the better chance to survive. If Tuvans and Native Americans are the most far from modernity, they had the least defense. Tuvans and Native Americans have already been destroyed by the modern time.

    England is the opposite. It is where internet was invented. It is origin of Alan Turing, Ada Lovelace, Charles Babbage. It is significantly the architect of modernity. They are the second country for Nobel Prizes. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nobel_laureates_by_country#United_Kingdom It's possibly going to be one of the more resilient societies in this century as they are one of the nationalities which is driving modernity.
  505. Bashibuzuk says:
    @LatW
    @Bashibuzuk

    Thank you for your intelligent comment, as usual, it is good to be able to read an alternative view.


    Poland is preparing to fight RusFed in the Baltics and Ukraine. Poland intends to become the focal point for the assembly of the Intermarium.
     
    Well, everyone will fight together, hopefully, if RusFed manages to attack. Now or in 20 or 30 years, either way. Frankly, it's about time that Poland (and the region in general) started thinking about its military, to go for 30 years without a serious military in this region is a luxury. That vacuum needed to be filled. Finland, for example, had a good relationship with Russia because it could always lean on their military and reserves.

    The Intermarium is put in place to prevent the economic connectivity between Old Europe (France, Italy, Germany…) and China through the territories currently controlled, or in the case of Belarus, influenced by the RusFed.
     
    Of course, one can always read it that way, but the original idea of the Intermarium originated as an attempt to defend the region from both sides. The original ideas were developed already in the 1920s (in fact, even during the Civil War in the Russian Empire, interestingly, some of the founding ideologues of the Intermarium actually fought alongside with the Whites). At that time neither the US, nor China were as prominent as they are today. (Yes, Britain was, but not to the extent to manage the whole region).

    As to the economic connectivity, before 2020 and within the security arrangement that lasted until 2022, the trade between the EU and Russia was increasing, Russia's export structure was starting to change from just raw material to more of actual product and Ukraine, too, started trading more. Everyone was benefiting. Had the RusFed not made the ultimatum in December 2021, this would have continued to everyone's benefit (despite the problems started in 2014).

    Also, looking further back into the past, some of the pipelines were closed by Russia for political reasons already in the 1990s (due to the Karaganov doctrine to use energy as a political tool). It didn't have to happen (I doubt there was some strict diktat from the US or UK to close those pipes, that came from the RusFed side).

    Old Europe is being sacrificed by the Atlanticist branch of the Globalist to prevent the appearance of the Eurasian economic and military superpower in which China and Old Europe would be the major stakeholders, with RusFed, Iran and Turkey being the minor ones.
     
    These kinds of projects of massive global scale (same as the USSR), in order to work, need to be created in a way that every participant's interests are protected and their needs are met. Not through domination because that doesn't work on the micro level. When you invite large stakeholders such as China, you need to consider everyone's interests. Not just interests of German businesses or Russian / Chinese oligarchs.

    Poland is gambling to become an additional major stakeholder in this geopolitical situation that will define the first half of the twenty-first century in Eurasia.
     
    Poland wants peace in the region so it can continue to thrive. Poland et al want a space where their own can develop, where they themselves are given priority and not outsiders (who ever they may be).

    They could have ordered their main battle tanks and other military upgrades in Old Europe, but they didn’t. By choosing to proceed that way they (over ?) emphasize their independence and what they see as their growing clout in the Eurasian affairs.
     
    The military equipment is sourced from several countries that are the main global producers. Germany, US, Israel, South Korea, Sweden, Finland, Turkey, those being the top producers of the best weapons and there is a limited number of producers who can deliver the required amount in a limited time frame for the best price. Germany put her military production on the back burner for many years and Germany is also reluctant to sell for political reasons (which is understandable). Afaik, the German tanks are also more expensive and not as readily available.

    As usual, Poland might end up punching above their weight. It has happened before and we know how it usually ends when it happens. Old Europe will not go gentle into that good night, it might well push Poland towards a direct confrontational with the RusFed in Ukraine, Belarus and the Baltics, and then backstab it when the going gets tough
     
    .

    We don't know how the chips will fall. One must learn from history and it is certainly tempting to draw these comparisons, but, as Heraclitus said, you cannot step in the same river twice, panta rei - everything flows, everything is in a flux, everything is a struggle.

    As to direct confrontation with RusFed (let's hope that doesn't happen), if there are more attacks on Western Ukraine, the kind that have already happened and if they escalate, that objectively becomes a big problem for Poland (and even Romania). RusFed could've stayed in Donbas (plus Belarus), but they decided to push further, much further (see the terms of the ultimatum). They decided to push for more than they can take.

    In the longer perspective, hopefully, there is one more chance to make up with Russia. The odds are low, but if there is even as little as 1% possibility, it should be used.

    That would allow for the birth of Eurasia from Dublin to Vladivostok with Han Chinese characteristics.
     
    Did you ask the Dubliners (will their job be to provide Guinness?) and the Siberians? As to Han Chinese characteristics, if that's what the majority of Russians want... alas, it's their land.

    And just a note about money. Poland is now Germany's 5th largest trading partner (Poland recently surpassed Italy that way), so their trade volumes are consistently high. Germany doesn't object.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

    As to the economic connectivity, before 2020 and within the security arrangement that lasted until 2022, the trade between the EU and Russia was increasing, Russia’s export structure was starting to change from just raw material to more of actual product and Ukraine, too, started trading more. Everyone was benefiting. Had the RusFed not made the ultimatum in December 2021, this would have continued to everyone’s benefit (despite the problems started in 2014).

    I think this is precisely why this whole thing happened. The Great Reset is about causing economic downturn during the fourth industrial revolution transition to preserve the limited natural ressources for those future generations of genetic lineages whom will get past the current population bottleneck, while NATO is of course about “keeping Germans down, keeping Russians out and keeping Americans in”. Combine both and you get the picture.

    We have two global projects for the posthuman/transhuman future of mankind: the ones of the Chinese elites and the Globalized West elites. Only one of these projects will prevail.

    RusFed tried to ride on both trains and sit on both chairs at once. As usual with Pynya, it was more about indecision than about strategic ambivalence (RusFed has no strategy it is led by Noviops who only do tactical moves).

    So after 2012 and Pynya’s coming back and clinging to power, the Globalized West has chosen to act in order to prevent both Ukraine and RusFed from either emerging as a unified economic space and/or joining OBOR. Remember that offers of “Reset” in US and RusFed relations have been made to Medvedev and seemingly moved forward until Pynya came back. Possibly, the 2008 financial and the 2012 economic crisis also did not help. A sense of urgency might have prevailed among the Atlanticist elite back then during the Maidan.

    [MORE]

    These kinds of projects of massive global scale (same as the USSR), in order to work, need to be created in a way that every participant’s interests are protected and their needs are met. Not through domination because that doesn’t work on the micro level. When you invite large stakeholders such as China, you need to consider everyone’s interests. Not just interests of German businesses or Russian / Chinese oligarchs.

    These massive projects actually all end up in the way of the Babel Tower, they crumble while the multitudes that built them divide and dissolve. That is unless and until it remains held together by brute force and/or very strong metaphysics. Elites always think that their attempt is different and cannot be compared to the historical records, but since times immemorial it always ends the same. There will be no Heaven on Earth built by Elites’ Decree.

    Poland wants peace in the region so it can continue to thrive. Poland et al want a space where their own can develop, where they themselves are given priority and not outsiders (who ever they may be).

    Poland and others in the region have an axe to grind with those who have dominated them in the past. It is the result of both a national trauma and a national superiority complex. When Poles are honest, they usually recognize as much. I had a couple of Polish friends with whom I got along rather well (we had a similar type of humor) and they candidly admitted that when it comes to Russians they have a hard time remaining rational. Interestingly enough, it is not the case at all in RusFed where people have a very balanced attitude towards Poland, and if educated enough usually appreciate Polish literature, movies and music. Im general, Russians usually do not see Poles or Balts as inferior or inherently hostile.

    The military equipment is sourced from several countries that are the main global producers. Germany, US, Israel, South Korea, Sweden, Finland, Turkey, those being the top producers of the best weapons and there is a limited number of producers who can deliver the required amount in a limited time frame for the best price. Germany put her military production on the back burner for many years and Germany is also reluctant to sell for political reasons (which is understandable). Afaik, the German tanks are also more expensive and not as readily available.

    Sure, but they get their subsidies’ moneys from EU, mostly from Western European’s taxpayers taxes or the inflation that all the EU citizens have to absorb when EU Central Banks print moneys out of thin air. They should promote and prefer EU industries and EU countries MIC. But they buy Korean or in the case of future nuclear stations American companies. It is not the way old EC used to work when they built Airbus or other great European industries. It is as if Eastern Euros are here for the subsidies, but not for the economic cooperation that might favor Old Europe. It is a selfish attitude.

    We don’t know how the chips will fall. One must learn from history and it is certainly tempting to draw these comparisons, but, as Heraclitus said, you cannot step in the same river twice, panta rei – everything flows, everything is in a flux, everything is a struggle.

    Agreed.

    Did you ask the Dubliners (will their job be to provide Guinness?) and the Siberians? As to Han Chinese characteristics, if that’s what the majority of Russians want… alas, it’s their land.

    Nobody wants this, but it might occur nevertheless. As I wrote earlier, we have to choose between two Globalist projects. The Chinese is one of those.

    Poland is now Germany’s 5th largest trading partner (Poland recently surpassed Italy that way), so their trade volumes are consistently high. Germany doesn’t object.

    The problem is not economic, but political. Germany doesn’t have to be dictated by Poland or Eastern European EU members in general. Old Europe will not stand it. Eastern European EU members might end up learning it the hard way.

    • Replies: @LatW
    @Bashibuzuk


    I think this is precisely why this whole thing happened.
     
    Well, the simple truth is that the resources that the RusFed wanted to take over belong to Ukraine. And you can argue that others would've vied for them, but the truth is that Ukraine was ramping up the production of grain and other products, as well as producing tech, that was benefiting everyone. Why did it have to be stopped? There is terrible ruin now in the East (nobody was going to take over the Eastern Ukraine, we just needed it as a buffer).

    The Great Reset is about causing economic downturn during the fourth industrial revolution transition to preserve the limited natural ressources for those future generations of genetic lineages whom will get past the current population bottleneck, while NATO is of course about “keeping Germans down, keeping Russians out and keeping Americans in”. Combine both and you get the picture.
     
    Well, if they want to preserve resources, hypothetically, for some future group of select or limited genetic lineages, then even more so, they should avoid open wars, but try to take over via trade, mergers, acquisitions, etc. There is now environmental damage, too. I think that Putin just wanted to take over Ukraine's resources, before anyone else does. He saw that Ukraine was leaving so he tried to grab what he can.

    As to NATO, the problem there, is that, from the POV of Ukrainians and some other Russia's neighbors, NATO, most likely, would've reacted somewhat mildly to a Russian takeover of Donbas. This would have been a position favored by some Western Euros. Obviously, the Western continentals here on this forum support it. There would've been a reaction, but insufficient to make any real difference. Ukraine would've been left on its own with that problem, essentially. Whereas with an outright invasion, the West saw it as more of a threat and, because Ukraine managed to fight back, the West granted support. Had this not happened it'd be business as usual and Russia could've continued its creeping annexations. It's actually a sign of treachery against Ukraine, but the trade and political dialogue would've continued.

    We have two global projects for the posthuman/transhuman future of mankind: the ones of the Chinese elites and the Globalized West elites. Only one of these projects will prevail.
     
    You think it really will be "transhuman"? You think human beings want to live that way?

    Well, don't you think both of those Globalist projects are dependent on each other? I didn't read Xi's speech, but I heard that he was kind of calling for a bipolar world again. Meaning, China and the West. If it will be so and if it will be strictly delineated, then those on your side, who are not willing to stay under China and want to be closer to us, will still be separated from us, which is really lame.

    As usual with Pynya, it was more about indecision than about strategic ambivalence (RusFed has no strategy it is led by Noviops who only do tactical moves).
     
    Pynya is indecisive, but at least he's cautious and knows how to play the long game (until now). It just didn't work because of the internal corruption (and the continuous siphoning of cash overseas, which is, ofc, the result of non-strategic thinking or at least not the right kind of it).

    So after 2012 and Pynya’s coming back and clinging to power, the Globalized West has chosen to act in order to prevent both Ukraine and RusFed from either emerging as a unified economic space and/or joining OBOR
     
    It started with the Munich speech in 2007. And Ukraine was always divided. But you're right that to keep him on for so long was probably a mistake from Russia's POV. But he was still at the peak of his popularity even back in 2012? In the meantime, right around that time, I remember, around 2010 or so, that the clampdown on ethnonats became very harsh. And, ofc, everyone else, too, so there was no political alternative.

    A sense of urgency might have prevailed among the Atlanticist elite back then during the Maidan.

     

    On the other hand, the Western approach towards Ukraine has been slow, reluctant, gradual, not all that interested, frankly. I think that only when the West saw that Ukraine can fight then they became truly interested in Ukraine. Because even after the Maidan there was reluctance to help improve Ukraine for further investment (even for the Baltic businesses Ukraine was difficult, you had to build a more favorable investment environment with stronger rule of law, that's tedious work, and help them but it was slowly starting to take place). I was actually quite optimistic about Russia at the time as well, because I saw the profile of Russian business change slightly (it changed from the more flashy пальцы веером type of culture to more "hipster" like with a genuine Russian cultural twist which I really liked.

    That is unless and until it remains held together by brute force and/or very strong metaphysics.
     
    The issue is that neither one of those is wanted anymore these days. So one must either live with what is currently available, or create some alternative metaphysics. Or re-invigorate something old.

    Poland and others in the region have an axe to grind with those who have dominated them in the past
     
    .

    Mostly they just want to be left alone (but also for Ukraine to be left alone). Everyone just wants to be treated as an equal but that's not what you guys want. You both want to be above. But you can't do that in our space. We're not asking for much.

    it is not the case at all in RusFed where people have a very balanced attitude towards Poland
     
    Yes, because RusFed was not a victim of Poland so they don't care and can be more relaxed.

    Sure, but they get their subsidies’ moneys from EU, mostly from Western European’s taxpayers taxes or the inflation that all the EU citizens have to absorb when EU Central Banks print moneys out of thin air.
     
    The EEs have to absorb this inflation, too. And the subsidies are only one aspect of this, the EU is very deeply integrated by now, as I said, the trade volumes and all sorts of mutual projects are just way too lucrative for the West to give up. Some companies invest 30 years ahead. They've had a good run. Remember that they got to utilize the human capital that came out of the 80s. Don't be naive, they got it good. Otherwise they simply wouldn't be there.

    They should promote and prefer EU industries and EU countries MIC.
     
    Well, ideally, this should be the case, the EU should be united and countries should support each other. But Western EU countries also don't just preference the East, they trade with the whole world. It's something that might be an ideal, but it doesn't comply with the reality on the ground, the EU is not like the USSR that way. And, as I said, the weapons industry is quite specific, the goods are very expensive and you have to look for the best deal. Because you have to be accountable to the EE taxpayer as well (the defense ministry gets grilled constantly by the media and the public about their spending).

    It is not the way old EC used to work when they built Airbus or other great European industries

     

    The old EC was different and didn't have access to EE at all.

    It is as if Eastern Euros are here for the subsidies, but not for the economic cooperation that might favor Old Europe. It is a selfish attitude.
     
    That's not fully accurate, there is a ton of economic cooperation, the EEs have made concessions and given up a lot of their own market share. Ideally, there should be a mutual benefit (in most cases there is). You seem to care a lot about Old Europe all of a sudden. I thought you cared more about your genetic brethren. 😔

    Nobody wants this, but it might occur nevertheless.
     
    I know for sure that the ethnonats strictly don't want it. Hard to say about the majority of the population.

    Germany doesn’t have to be dictated by Poland or Eastern European EU members in general.
     
    Nobody should be dictated to. That's one thing we should all learn. We should try to approach each other calmly and respectfully but it's hard during such a horrific war.

    Not sure about those tanks though, maybe the Germans themselves didn't want to sell them, it looks like the price and availability was the main issue, but who knows. Poland should build its own defense industry.

    Sorry for the length (and for taking up so much of your time).

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

    , @Barbarossa
    @Bashibuzuk


    We have two global projects for the posthuman/transhuman future of mankind: the ones of the Chinese elites and the Globalized West elites. Only one of these projects will prevail.
     
    Personally I'm hoping that neither will prevail. All of the above seem only inhuman and dead in the final estimation. I'm more than happy to live on the margins and keep to humanity 1.0 if one of them does become dominant.

    they crumble while the multitudes that built them divide and dissolve. That is unless and until it remains held together by brute force and/or very strong metaphysics.
     
    My observation tells me that this process is well underway in the US. The US is destined for either totalitarianism or authoritarianism since the raw human material capable of democracy or republicanism is largely gone. However, the high levels of basic dysfunction will make it fairly hobbled in it's ambitions. But yeah, I agree that utopias, especially top down ones, are a pipe dream that end badly. The Czars were repressive autocrats, but what came after made them look positively benign.


    we have to choose between two Globalist projects.
     
    As Rush put it, "If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice."
    , @Beckow
    @Bashibuzuk


    These massive projects actually all end up in the way of the Babel Tower, they crumble while the multitudes that built them divide and dissolve.
     
    The multitudes are still here, still breathing. Maybe they don't built much now and even simple maintenance has disappeared, but the momentum remains. Most people have nowhere to go as the modern globalist Tower of Babel crumbles. Everyone still clings to it, they join maddened Halloween crowds to experience it and go willingly to death for the sake of keeping the imported nonsense beliefs going, Like a youthful love that aged it is a combination of ritual, duty, and nagging fear that it is no longer meaningful. In the big picture it is bizarre that people die in Seoul for Halloween - a cargo cult sacrifice so disconnected from Korea that it indeed resembles a death cult.

    I usually think of the people afflicted with the modern liberal malady as dead-enders. They stopped considering what happens after the end and fully embraced the biological divine equation of life-and-death. Eventually they chose - maybe rationally or maybe out of hedonism - to live it up fully as individuals, human biology be damned. It is a natural progression. The current one, the last and most massive liberal wave in the human history, started with the Enlightenment.

    We reached a peak in the last few years: the uber-liberalism is everywhere, it even dominates its so called enemies. Putin is by all standards a liberal guy, so is the Pope, the children of Chinese nomenklatura, the crazy bush-fighters in Africa, and the Arab sheiks. They all bought into it, because it was good, it delivered. After the peak, some sort of a civil war was inevitable - watch any small group of animals as they get stranded, they start elbowing, shoving and eventually an all out fight erupts. When the road up is closed, we retrace the steps going back - the elites call it the reset.

    In Eastern Europe it will be very bad: it is the epicenter of the global civil war. Ukies stepped up as valiant warriors for the peak global uber-liberalism - nobody else seemed to have the cojones. Maybe the Poles will join in. There is a deep irony in who is now fighting to keep the globalism going slightly longer. But who would we expect to fight? It was the Goths against the Goths in most actual battles as Rome was easing into its oblivion. I find observing it quite enjoyable, painful but very real: lining up to die for a dead idea is very ancient. Like we are killing each others' gods forgetting that we are the ones who created them.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk, @A123

  506. @Bashibuzuk
    @AP

    You forget to mention that Russian Empire prevailed against the Rzeczpospolita because of the endemic fatal flaws in the Polish political system. It was too unstable due to the overtly self-serving and quarrelsome attitude of the Polish Szlachta.

    These flaws have of course been a natural outcome of the Slav character and culture. The Balto-Slav are too unruly, and as consequence not organized enough to build strong and large nations and countries. Historically, they have never been capable of long term and large scale cooperation against their common enemies. They prefer short term gains from siding with their future enemies against their ethnic kin. That's how they lost their Western lands to German colonization.

    In Russian Tsardom, these flaws have been dealt with by adopting Golden Horde and Ottoman Empire building praxis and Byzantine understanding of Religious structures. It basically crushed the Slav вольница which has only survived among the Cossack for a time, until the German ordnung put in place by Piter the Great and his Russian Empire successors dealt the final blow against it during the Pugachev uprising. Russian muzhiks lost all freedom, but they built a true Empire for the elite.

    Possibly, the only way to prevent the Balto-Slav from tribalism and internecine warfare is to put them firmly under an Imperial control. The Poles are not cut for this job. Perhaps, I am being too pessimistic and a kind of confederation of Balto-Slav, Finno-Ugric and Vlakh republics can be organized by the Poles under the Atlanticist patronage, but given the historical record, I wouldn't count on it too much.

    Regarding main battle tanks, the French are also part of Old Europe and they have the Leclerc and together France and Germany have worked on the MGCS project for 10 years already.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Ground_Combat_System

    Buying from their EU neighbors (and financial sponsors) would have been the right thing to do, but Poland acted otherwise in a very demonstrative manner. This is again nothing new, Polish honor is historically bordering on hubris...

    Replies: @LatW

    In Russian Tsardom, these flaws have been dealt with by adopting Golden Horde and Ottoman Empire building praxis and Byzantine understanding of Religious structures. It basically crushed the Slav вольница which has only survived among the Cossack for a time, until the German ordnung put in place by Piter the Great and his Russian Empire successors dealt the final blow against it during the Pugachev uprising. Russian muzhiks lost all freedom, but they built a true Empire for the elite.

    This is quite sad, actually. There are attractive things about this concept of вольница. It may not work as an organizational principle (since it basically sounds like bailing from tyranny), but it could be used for ideological purposes. A Russian freedom fighter says: “Я вольный”. Which is distinct from свободный (free). It comes from the Balto-Slav word “wave”. It means that the will actively arises from the human being (positive liberty, self-mastery). Yes, it is to some extent “unruly” (free, unencumbered, wild, powerful, subjective, independent, even licentious). But… there are major positives to this quality. If this quality can somehow be put in a framework and channeled positively, it can be quite awesome.

    The truth is – for Balto-Slav, neither the Byzantine despotism nor the German Ordnung are the best. There has to be our own way, that is best for our own mentality and temperament. It is something in between of those two and something really special that we must seek.

    • Replies: @Bashibuzuk
    @LatW


    The truth is – for Balto-Slav, neither the Byzantine despotism nor the German Ordnung are the best. There has to be our own way, that is best for our own mentality and temperament. It is something in between of those two and something really special that we must seek.
     
    I agree.

    The peasant population of the Tsarist Empire suffered tremendously under the domination of the Westernized Imperial elites. The Empire-building process has been a tragedy for the Russian muzhiks. That is why the muzhik turned his weapons against the Imperial State as soon as he could in 1917. That is why he raided the palaces and country houses of the Tsarist elite, killing their owners every time he could. He saw them as tyrants and tyrants they were.



    Instead of the Westernized Empire, the muzhik wanted a community that would manage local life along the usual lines of the peasant communal organization: Mir, he thought that they could manage their affairs without external intervention: "мы тут сами, миром решим" (we would decide ourselves here, as a community - peacefully).

    Somewhere far, the muzhik wanted a wise and benevolent chief, a father figure, a priestly intellectual who would spend his days and nights thinking of the greater good, while abstaining from any self-serving considerations.

    And in between this high spirited leader and his community, the muzhik wanted strong and just men, true heroes, fearless warriors deciding what is just in councils of equals and applying the law mercilessly to everyone without exception.

    That is all of course a very primitive social organization pattern: a Priestly King / a Warrior Caste / a peasant clan living of the land. It was pre-industrial, perhaps even pre-historical. And of course it was used against the poor and naive peasants as soon as they disarmed after the end of the Civil War.

    Instead of the Higher Priestley King, they got Stalin. Instead of the heroic Warrior Caste they got the sadistic NKVD, and instead the local community they got the kolkhoz enslavement.

    Better be careful about what we dream of. Dreams might turn to nightmares.

    Ataman Krasnov, was among the rare White Guard leaders who thought that the muzhik really needed two things: a strong local autonomy up to the regional level and a strong Tsar that might balance the differences and harmonize the interests between the communities for a greater good. His ideal was basically the confederation of Cossack Stanitzas under the rule of a popular Tsar (мужицкий Царь). But most White Guard officers were not monarchists, they were more often than not center-left democrats. And the muzhik did not (and doesn't until this very day) understand democracy.

    So going back to what would be best for Balto-Slav as social organization: IMO it would be a confederation with a strong local self administration and a center that would basically have the duty and power to ensure defense against the internal enemies (organized crime mostly and corrupt bureaucracy), and the external foes (anyone who would attempt to harm the Balto-Slav populations).

    It would be in short a Balto-Slav Union of Republics with a strong common defense and law enforcement forces, but with maximum local religious, cultural and economic independence.

    But perhaps it is too idealistic and would end up again in tyranny and in ensuing turmoil.

    Replies: @AP, @LatW

  507. “Black Lives Matter” is anti Africa.

    1. Africontinentalist is an Ibo Nigerian conservative
    2. The habitual Arktos technical difficulties are absent from this fine recording!
    (their work-in-progress has made substantial obvious progress)

  508. Bashibuzuk says:
    @LatW
    @Bashibuzuk


    In Russian Tsardom, these flaws have been dealt with by adopting Golden Horde and Ottoman Empire building praxis and Byzantine understanding of Religious structures. It basically crushed the Slav вольница which has only survived among the Cossack for a time, until the German ordnung put in place by Piter the Great and his Russian Empire successors dealt the final blow against it during the Pugachev uprising. Russian muzhiks lost all freedom, but they built a true Empire for the elite.
     
    This is quite sad, actually. There are attractive things about this concept of вольница. It may not work as an organizational principle (since it basically sounds like bailing from tyranny), but it could be used for ideological purposes. A Russian freedom fighter says: "Я вольный". Which is distinct from свободный (free). It comes from the Balto-Slav word "wave". It means that the will actively arises from the human being (positive liberty, self-mastery). Yes, it is to some extent "unruly" (free, unencumbered, wild, powerful, subjective, independent, even licentious). But... there are major positives to this quality. If this quality can somehow be put in a framework and channeled positively, it can be quite awesome.

    The truth is - for Balto-Slav, neither the Byzantine despotism nor the German Ordnung are the best. There has to be our own way, that is best for our own mentality and temperament. It is something in between of those two and something really special that we must seek.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

    The truth is – for Balto-Slav, neither the Byzantine despotism nor the German Ordnung are the best. There has to be our own way, that is best for our own mentality and temperament. It is something in between of those two and something really special that we must seek.

    I agree.

    The peasant population of the Tsarist Empire suffered tremendously under the domination of the Westernized Imperial elites. The Empire-building process has been a tragedy for the Russian muzhiks. That is why the muzhik turned his weapons against the Imperial State as soon as he could in 1917. That is why he raided the palaces and country houses of the Tsarist elite, killing their owners every time he could. He saw them as tyrants and tyrants they were.

    [MORE]

    Instead of the Westernized Empire, the muzhik wanted a community that would manage local life along the usual lines of the peasant communal organization: Mir, he thought that they could manage their affairs without external intervention: “мы тут сами, миром решим” (we would decide ourselves here, as a community – peacefully).

    Somewhere far, the muzhik wanted a wise and benevolent chief, a father figure, a priestly intellectual who would spend his days and nights thinking of the greater good, while abstaining from any self-serving considerations.

    And in between this high spirited leader and his community, the muzhik wanted strong and just men, true heroes, fearless warriors deciding what is just in councils of equals and applying the law mercilessly to everyone without exception.

    That is all of course a very primitive social organization pattern: a Priestly King / a Warrior Caste / a peasant clan living of the land. It was pre-industrial, perhaps even pre-historical. And of course it was used against the poor and naive peasants as soon as they disarmed after the end of the Civil War.

    Instead of the Higher Priestley King, they got Stalin. Instead of the heroic Warrior Caste they got the sadistic NKVD, and instead the local community they got the kolkhoz enslavement.

    Better be careful about what we dream of. Dreams might turn to nightmares.

    Ataman Krasnov, was among the rare White Guard leaders who thought that the muzhik really needed two things: a strong local autonomy up to the regional level and a strong Tsar that might balance the differences and harmonize the interests between the communities for a greater good. His ideal was basically the confederation of Cossack Stanitzas under the rule of a popular Tsar (мужицкий Царь). But most White Guard officers were not monarchists, they were more often than not center-left democrats. And the muzhik did not (and doesn’t until this very day) understand democracy.

    So going back to what would be best for Balto-Slav as social organization: IMO it would be a confederation with a strong local self administration and a center that would basically have the duty and power to ensure defense against the internal enemies (organized crime mostly and corrupt bureaucracy), and the external foes (anyone who would attempt to harm the Balto-Slav populations).

    It would be in short a Balto-Slav Union of Republics with a strong common defense and law enforcement forces, but with maximum local religious, cultural and economic independence.

    But perhaps it is too idealistic and would end up again in tyranny and in ensuing turmoil.

    • Replies: @AP
    @Bashibuzuk


    So going back to what would be best for Balto-Slav as social organization: IMO it would be a confederation with a strong local self administration and a center that would basically have the duty and power to ensure defense against the internal enemies
     
    This is not unlike the PLC. Novgorod was destroyed because it was considering joining.
    , @LatW
    @Bashibuzuk


    The Empire-building process has been a tragedy for the Russian muzhiks.
     
    That's true, the Russian muzhik has often been treated unjustly and made disposable. It's a lot to take.

    the muzhik wanted a community that would manage local life along the usual lines of the peasant communal organization: Mir, he thought that they could manage their affairs without external intervention: “мы тут сами, миром решим”
     
    Superficially, this reminds me a little bit of the Nordic principle of lagom - it means, "just enough" or "everything in moderation", and apparently it comes from when the vikings were passing the horn around and everyone could drink just a bit (or just enough, so there would be enough for them just as much as for the next guy). So that's where the Nordic idea of moderation and egalitarianism comes from. But, ofc, the viking society had classes - a king, karl, jarl, slaves, so it was not at all egalitarian in that aspect. The Russian version may or may not be something similar. Yes, the Russians are quite communal, Balts are less so - the Balts traditionally preferred to live not in villages but separate homesteads that are spread out with several buildings and lots of pasture and woods.

    That is all of course a very primitive social organization pattern: a Priestly King / a Warrior Caste / a peasant clan living of the land
     
    In some ways, if you exclude urbanization, these sentiments were somewhat felt in the 1930s authoritarian ideologies. So it's not something that would have been entirely out of reach even as recent as the 20th century (if it weren't for the unfortunate things that took place). These were viable ideas. Primitive doesn't always mean bad. Our societies today are complex, which is interesting, but sometimes one yearns for something simple.

    Better be careful about what we dream of. Dreams might turn to nightmares.

     

    Well put, lol.

    мужицкий Царь
     
    Well, that might be a kind of a myth or an ideal upon which a muzhik could even self-reflect. It's a little bit of a late 19th century romantic idea. But, yes, I'm aware, that that's what Russians long for sometimes, which makes one think that their skepticism of democracy is not just something that derives from the hardships of the 90s.

    But most White Guard officers were not monarchists, they were more often than not center-left democrats.
     
    See, everyone who has older relatives in the former Russian Empire knows this (you hear this from your grandparents about their grandparents), many were "democrats" at that time as those ideas had become broadly popular.

    And the muzhik did not (and doesn’t until this very day) understand democracy.
     
    Well, democracy requires compromises and a certain flexibility of the psyche, the muzhik has a very simple, direct, naive and straightforward psyche. I don't mean this in a bad or condescending way.

    So going back to what would be best for Balto-Slav as social organization: IMO it would be a confederation with a strong local self administration and a center that would basically have the duty and power to ensure defense against the internal enemies (organized crime mostly and corrupt bureaucracy),
     
    Yes, but I'd be careful with any far reaching security institutions that guard against "internal" enemies. It smacks a little bit of FSB chasing nationalists. But, wait, our Balto-Slav confederation would already be nationalist in essence, hopefully.

    But perhaps it is too idealistic and would end up again in tyranny and in ensuing turmoil.
     
    Yes, it is very idealistic, but you laid it out very well.
  509. @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Mr. Hack

    You know how it's a hassle keeping your phone charged?

    Multiply by 700 for a car. All those happy EV owners are a mystery. For a company fleet where you have people whose job is managing charging it is merely a cost of doing business. For a personal vehicle it is one more job you don't get any payment for doing.

    Don't you already have plenty of jobs you have to do where you don't get paid?

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @Barbarossa

    Although, you have to admit that sometimes having to fill up at the gas station is a pain too.

    One effect that phasing in EVs will have will be a diminishing of local government revenue that comes from sales tax and fuel taxes on IC vehicle consumption. That may not seem to be a big deal in some areas, but for an area like mine will actually hurt. I don’t know if this has been considered at all.

    • Replies: @Sher Singh
    @Barbarossa

    ICEs eat gas in the cold & EVs even worse. Buying them in Northern climes is retarded.
    I've seen ICEs use almost double the Petrol below -15C that they do at 0 on the highway.

    Honda/Toyota literally only want to make Hybrids - PHEV are cool. Fuck battery only,
    More centralized Gov Revenue & Control is a Plus of EVs for the Nigerals.

    Replies: @Barbarossa

  510. • Replies: @A123
    @Sher Singh


    Notes on the tropes

    First Hindu PM
    Hindu Supremacists
    Desi Bro
    Upper caste
    Beef and alcohol
    Ganesha murti [used to secure £££]
    Faux anti-colonials of India [because successful]

    Implication: real Hindu decolonisers are poor and must wear Gandhi loincloth in 10 Downing St.
     

    Leftoids use race, religion, and other forms of polarized division to drive their emotionalist dogma. Anything that does not fit the stereotype must be crushed and ridiculed to protect Globalist theology.

    If Sunak was chosen by the Labour party, you would have none of this. However, a racial minority on the other side breaks the narrative. Thus, he must be "depicted" as white. Sunak said this on the record: (1)


    Rishi Sunak tells Macron that Channel must be 'completely unviable' for people traffickers as he pushes for new small boats deal with France
    ...
    The leaders committed to deepening our partnership to deter deadly journeys across the Channel that benefit organised criminals.

    'The Prime Minister and President Macron looked forward to meeting soon and to holding a UK-France summit next year.'

    Mr Sunak also wants to set tough new targets for the Home Office on asylum processing times, so that eight out of ten are completed within six months, The Times reported.
     

    SJW's categorize this migration stance as White Nationalist. Therefore, Sunak = White Racist. Braverman = Even More White Nationalist.

    This should be no surprise to anyone. In America SJW's regularly state, Justice Clearance Thomas = White.

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11365131/Sunak-tells-Macron-Channel-crossings-completely-unviable.html

    Replies: @Sean

  511. Sher Singh says:
    @Barbarossa
    @Emil Nikola Richard

    Although, you have to admit that sometimes having to fill up at the gas station is a pain too.

    One effect that phasing in EVs will have will be a diminishing of local government revenue that comes from sales tax and fuel taxes on IC vehicle consumption. That may not seem to be a big deal in some areas, but for an area like mine will actually hurt. I don't know if this has been considered at all.

    Replies: @Sher Singh

    ICEs eat gas in the cold & EVs even worse. Buying them in Northern climes is retarded.
    I’ve seen ICEs use almost double the Petrol below -15C that they do at 0 on the highway.

    Honda/Toyota literally only want to make Hybrids – PHEV are cool. Fuck battery only,
    More centralized Gov Revenue & Control is a Plus of EVs for the Nigerals.

    • Replies: @Barbarossa
    @Sher Singh


    EVs even worse. Buying them in Northern climes is retarded.
     
    Another technical issue that this reminds me of is that you should charge Lithium Ion batteries in the cold; it kills battery life.

    https://inl.gov/article/electric-vehicles/

    The article alludes to the charging management system limiting charge rate to avoid damage in cold weather, but I wouldn't be surprised if it decreased total charging cycles in the long run.

    More centralized Gov Revenue & Control is a Plus of EVs for the Nigerals.

     

    Agreed on that.
  512. @Bashibuzuk
    @LatW


    As to the economic connectivity, before 2020 and within the security arrangement that lasted until 2022, the trade between the EU and Russia was increasing, Russia’s export structure was starting to change from just raw material to more of actual product and Ukraine, too, started trading more. Everyone was benefiting. Had the RusFed not made the ultimatum in December 2021, this would have continued to everyone’s benefit (despite the problems started in 2014).
     
    I think this is precisely why this whole thing happened. The Great Reset is about causing economic downturn during the fourth industrial revolution transition to preserve the limited natural ressources for those future generations of genetic lineages whom will get past the current population bottleneck, while NATO is of course about "keeping Germans down, keeping Russians out and keeping Americans in". Combine both and you get the picture.

    We have two global projects for the posthuman/transhuman future of mankind: the ones of the Chinese elites and the Globalized West elites. Only one of these projects will prevail.

    RusFed tried to ride on both trains and sit on both chairs at once. As usual with Pynya, it was more about indecision than about strategic ambivalence (RusFed has no strategy it is led by Noviops who only do tactical moves).

    So after 2012 and Pynya's coming back and clinging to power, the Globalized West has chosen to act in order to prevent both Ukraine and RusFed from either emerging as a unified economic space and/or joining OBOR. Remember that offers of "Reset" in US and RusFed relations have been made to Medvedev and seemingly moved forward until Pynya came back. Possibly, the 2008 financial and the 2012 economic crisis also did not help. A sense of urgency might have prevailed among the Atlanticist elite back then during the Maidan.


    These kinds of projects of massive global scale (same as the USSR), in order to work, need to be created in a way that every participant’s interests are protected and their needs are met. Not through domination because that doesn’t work on the micro level. When you invite large stakeholders such as China, you need to consider everyone’s interests. Not just interests of German businesses or Russian / Chinese oligarchs.
     
    These massive projects actually all end up in the way of the Babel Tower, they crumble while the multitudes that built them divide and dissolve. That is unless and until it remains held together by brute force and/or very strong metaphysics. Elites always think that their attempt is different and cannot be compared to the historical records, but since times immemorial it always ends the same. There will be no Heaven on Earth built by Elites' Decree.

    Poland wants peace in the region so it can continue to thrive. Poland et al want a space where their own can develop, where they themselves are given priority and not outsiders (who ever they may be).
     
    Poland and others in the region have an axe to grind with those who have dominated them in the past. It is the result of both a national trauma and a national superiority complex. When Poles are honest, they usually recognize as much. I had a couple of Polish friends with whom I got along rather well (we had a similar type of humor) and they candidly admitted that when it comes to Russians they have a hard time remaining rational. Interestingly enough, it is not the case at all in RusFed where people have a very balanced attitude towards Poland, and if educated enough usually appreciate Polish literature, movies and music. Im general, Russians usually do not see Poles or Balts as inferior or inherently hostile.

    The military equipment is sourced from several countries that are the main global producers. Germany, US, Israel, South Korea, Sweden, Finland, Turkey, those being the top producers of the best weapons and there is a limited number of producers who can deliver the required amount in a limited time frame for the best price. Germany put her military production on the back burner for many years and Germany is also reluctant to sell for political reasons (which is understandable). Afaik, the German tanks are also more expensive and not as readily available.
     
    Sure, but they get their subsidies' moneys from EU, mostly from Western European's taxpayers taxes or the inflation that all the EU citizens have to absorb when EU Central Banks print moneys out of thin air. They should promote and prefer EU industries and EU countries MIC. But they buy Korean or in the case of future nuclear stations American companies. It is not the way old EC used to work when they built Airbus or other great European industries. It is as if Eastern Euros are here for the subsidies, but not for the economic cooperation that might favor Old Europe. It is a selfish attitude.

    We don’t know how the chips will fall. One must learn from history and it is certainly tempting to draw these comparisons, but, as Heraclitus said, you cannot step in the same river twice, panta rei – everything flows, everything is in a flux, everything is a struggle.
     
    Agreed.

    Did you ask the Dubliners (will their job be to provide Guinness?) and the Siberians? As to Han Chinese characteristics, if that’s what the majority of Russians want… alas, it’s their land.
     
    Nobody wants this, but it might occur nevertheless. As I wrote earlier, we have to choose between two Globalist projects. The Chinese is one of those.

    Poland is now Germany’s 5th largest trading partner (Poland recently surpassed Italy that way), so their trade volumes are consistently high. Germany doesn’t object.
     
    The problem is not economic, but political. Germany doesn't have to be dictated by Poland or Eastern European EU members in general. Old Europe will not stand it. Eastern European EU members might end up learning it the hard way.

    Replies: @LatW, @Barbarossa, @Beckow

    I think this is precisely why this whole thing happened.

    Well, the simple truth is that the resources that the RusFed wanted to take over belong to Ukraine. And you can argue that others would’ve vied for them, but the truth is that Ukraine was ramping up the production of grain and other products, as well as producing tech, that was benefiting everyone. Why did it have to be stopped? There is terrible ruin now in the East (nobody was going to take over the Eastern Ukraine, we just needed it as a buffer).

    [MORE]

    The Great Reset is about causing economic downturn during the fourth industrial revolution transition to preserve the limited natural ressources for those future generations of genetic lineages whom will get past the current population bottleneck, while NATO is of course about “keeping Germans down, keeping Russians out and keeping Americans in”. Combine both and you get the picture.

    Well, if they want to preserve resources, hypothetically, for some future group of select or limited genetic lineages, then even more so, they should avoid open wars, but try to take over via trade, mergers, acquisitions, etc. There is now environmental damage, too. I think that Putin just wanted to take over Ukraine’s resources, before anyone else does. He saw that Ukraine was leaving so he tried to grab what he can.

    As to NATO, the problem there, is that, from the POV of Ukrainians and some other Russia’s neighbors, NATO, most likely, would’ve reacted somewhat mildly to a Russian takeover of Donbas. This would have been a position favored by some Western Euros. Obviously, the Western continentals here on this forum support it. There would’ve been a reaction, but insufficient to make any real difference. Ukraine would’ve been left on its own with that problem, essentially. Whereas with an outright invasion, the West saw it as more of a threat and, because Ukraine managed to fight back, the West granted support. Had this not happened it’d be business as usual and Russia could’ve continued its creeping annexations. It’s actually a sign of treachery against Ukraine, but the trade and political dialogue would’ve continued.

    We have two global projects for the posthuman/transhuman future of mankind: the ones of the Chinese elites and the Globalized West elites. Only one of these projects will prevail.

    You think it really will be “transhuman”? You think human beings want to live that way?

    Well, don’t you think both of those Globalist projects are dependent on each other? I didn’t read Xi’s speech, but I heard that he was kind of calling for a bipolar world again. Meaning, China and the West. If it will be so and if it will be strictly delineated, then those on your side, who are not willing to stay under China and want to be closer to us, will still be separated from us, which is really lame.

    As usual with Pynya, it was more about indecision than about strategic ambivalence (RusFed has no strategy it is led by Noviops who only do tactical moves).

    Pynya is indecisive, but at least he’s cautious and knows how to play the long game (until now). It just didn’t work because of the internal corruption (and the continuous siphoning of cash overseas, which is, ofc, the result of non-strategic thinking or at least not the right kind of it).

    So after 2012 and Pynya’s coming back and clinging to power, the Globalized West has chosen to act in order to prevent both Ukraine and RusFed from either emerging as a unified economic space and/or joining OBOR

    It started with the Munich speech in 2007. And Ukraine was always divided. But you’re right that to keep him on for so long was probably a mistake from Russia’s POV. But he was still at the peak of his popularity even back in 2012? In the meantime, right around that time, I remember, around 2010 or so, that the clampdown on ethnonats became very harsh. And, ofc, everyone else, too, so there was no political alternative.

    A sense of urgency might have prevailed among the Atlanticist elite back then during the Maidan.

    On the other hand, the Western approach towards Ukraine has been slow, reluctant, gradual, not all that interested, frankly. I think that only when the West saw that Ukraine can fight then they became truly interested in Ukraine. Because even after the Maidan there was reluctance to help improve Ukraine for further investment (even for the Baltic businesses Ukraine was difficult, you had to build a more favorable investment environment with stronger rule of law, that’s tedious work, and help them but it was slowly starting to take place). I was actually quite optimistic about Russia at the time as well, because I saw the profile of Russian business change slightly (it changed from the more flashy пальцы веером type of culture to more “hipster” like with a genuine Russian cultural twist which I really liked.

    That is unless and until it remains held together by brute force and/or very strong metaphysics.

    The issue is that neither one of those is wanted anymore these days. So one must either live with what is currently available, or create some alternative metaphysics. Or re-invigorate something old.

    Poland and others in the region have an axe to grind with those who have dominated them in the past

    .

    Mostly they just want to be left alone (but also for Ukraine to be left alone). Everyone just wants to be treated as an equal but that’s not what you guys want. You both want to be above. But you can’t do that in our space. We’re not asking for much.

    it is not the case at all in RusFed where people have a very balanced attitude towards Poland

    Yes, because RusFed was not a victim of Poland so they don’t care and can be more relaxed.

    Sure, but they get their subsidies’ moneys from EU, mostly from Western European’s taxpayers taxes or the inflation that all the EU citizens have to absorb when EU Central Banks print moneys out of thin air.

    The EEs have to absorb this inflation, too. And the subsidies are only one aspect of this, the EU is very deeply integrated by now, as I said, the trade volumes and all sorts of mutual projects are just way too lucrative for the West to give up. Some companies invest 30 years ahead. They’ve had a good run. Remember that they got to utilize the human capital that came out of the 80s. Don’t be naive, they got it good. Otherwise they simply wouldn’t be there.

    They should promote and prefer EU industries and EU countries MIC.

    Well, ideally, this should be the case, the EU should be united and countries should support each other. But Western EU countries also don’t just preference the East, they trade with the whole world. It’s something that might be an ideal, but it doesn’t comply with the reality on the ground, the EU is not like the USSR that way. And, as I said, the weapons industry is quite specific, the goods are very expensive and you have to look for the best deal. Because you have to be accountable to the EE taxpayer as well (the defense ministry gets grilled constantly by the media and the public about their spending).

    It is not the way old EC used to work when they built Airbus or other great European industries

    The old EC was different and didn’t have access to EE at all.

    It is as if Eastern Euros are here for the subsidies, but not for the economic cooperation that might favor Old Europe. It is a selfish attitude.

    That’s not fully accurate, there is a ton of economic cooperation, the EEs have made concessions and given up a lot of their own market share. Ideally, there should be a mutual benefit (in most cases there is). You seem to care a lot about Old Europe all of a sudden. I thought you cared more about your genetic brethren. 😔

    Nobody wants this, but it might occur nevertheless.

    I know for sure that the ethnonats strictly don’t want it. Hard to say about the majority of the population.

    Germany doesn’t have to be dictated by Poland or Eastern European EU members in general.

    Nobody should be dictated to. That’s one thing we should all learn. We should try to approach each other calmly and respectfully but it’s hard during such a horrific war.

    Not sure about those tanks though, maybe the Germans themselves didn’t want to sell them, it looks like the price and availability was the main issue, but who knows. Poland should build its own defense industry.

    Sorry for the length (and for taking up so much of your time).

    • Replies: @Bashibuzuk
    @LatW


    the resources that the RusFed wanted to take over belong to Ukraine
     
    I was referring to the overall trend in downsizing the natural ressources consumption under the circular economy promoted as part of the fourth industrial revolution. They believe in balancing human consumption with the overall ressources of the biosphere. At least as long as we don't have sufficient energy to and technological advances for an access to Solar System's ressources.

    OTOH, there's not that much ressources that RusFed would have wanted to take over in Ukraine. Black soils for agricultural purposes and human ressources come to mind along with what was left of Soviet technology in aerospace and some other high tech fields. And all that was accessible under the agreement for Eurasian Economic Union. Remember that RusFed offered EU to have tripartite discussions with Ukraine in 2013, an offer EU declined.


    they should avoid open wars, but try to take over via trade, mergers, acquisitions, etc.
     
    A simple manner to restrict ressources consumption is through outright depopulation. Remember the bison slaughter on the Great Plains to force the bison hunting tribes off the land and into the reservations. Today, warfare and ensuing technosphere, electric grid and overall damage to industry would play the same role. Force the "wrong people" out of the land as refugees and drop their already low birth rate. Then in a couple of generations (this is the time the fourth industrial revolution transition would take according to Chubais) you can take this land and give it to the "right people".

    Whereas with an outright invasion, the West saw it as more of a threat and, because Ukraine managed to fight back, the West granted support. Had this not happened it’d be business as usual and Russia could’ve continued its creeping annexations.
     
    Pynya got tricked just like Saddam in Koweit. For whatever reason (probably some backdoor deal with some global elite faction) he thought that the SMO would go as smoothly in Ukraine as it did in Kazakhstan. Why he believed it is a mystery, perhaps he has been promised an anti-Zelensky coup in Ukraine? And he was ready and willing to push back Donbass rebel regions into a federated Ukraine under the Minsk 2 agreement.

    What is truly amazing is his anti-NATO ultimatum. He couldn't have possibly thought that NATO would seriously discuss it. It was monumental chutzpah which is not the way he usually behaves. There is something mysterious about this topic, some information we will probably never know.

    You think it really will be “transhuman”? You think human beings want to live that way?
     
    The plebs will be forced to live in a human anthill like manner under a Big Data social score system in smart cities. The plebs will stop reproducing, but that would be a feature not a bug. The elite would enjoy a far greater lifespan, better health and enhanced cognitive capabilities. They will have an infinitely higher standard of living compared to the masses if plebs. Then after a few generations, the human population would reach a technological level that would allow humans to colonize Solar System, while the biosphere would be restored and the plebs would mostly perish in their smart city "mouse utopia" (as per Calhoun's Universe 25).

    Well, don’t you think both of those Globalist projects are dependent on each other?
     
    Yes they are, it is a false dichotomy just like Communism vs Capitalism in the previous Cold War. Two roads leading to the same cliff (to use Shafarevich's book title). But in the end the question would be who is in control: the Globalized Western elites or the CCP Nomenklatura? That is what the fighting will be all about, not some "human rights" BS.

    then those on your side, who are not willing to stay under China and want to be closer to us, will still be separated from us, which is really lame.
     
    Those "on my side" want nothing to do with any type of Globalist agenda, either Western or Chinese. They are both inhumane and will both most probably lead to catastrophic consequences in the end. Those "on my side " are to be found all around the world, China included. Most people want to stay human and have a somewhat meaningful normal human life. Transhumanists and Technofetishists are few and far between. Nevertheless, the silent majority will most probably end up forced to live under the Globalist managed system. And it will mean its genetic lineages elimination from the global gene pool after a few generations.

    It started with the Munich speech in 2007.
     
    According to Klaus Schwab, Pynya was a WEF Young Global Leader since his early years in politics. They probably assigned him the role of the "Russian Ubervilain" to be feared by the Western middle class. A middle class sheeple distracted by Pynya's antics, while being carefully and patiently downsized and corralled fowards extinction.

    The issue is that neither one of those is wanted anymore these days. So one must either live with what is currently available, or create some alternative metaphysics. Or re-invigorate something old.
     
    This is true. We need re-invigorated metaphysics. I think we will not manage to preserve human civilization without it. All the Transhumanist claims to the opposite non withstanding. They believe in deus ex machina but their "gods" are "technological demons". We need to bring back human archetypes of the higher kind from the collective subconscious to oppose the Technosphere and its pseudo-sentient entities.

    Mostly they just want to be left alone (but also for Ukraine to be left alone). Everyone just wants to be treated as an equal but that’s not what you guys want. You both want to be above. But you can’t do that in our space. We’re not asking for much.
     
    Unfortunately, you will not be left alone, nobody will. Anyway, your elites clearly enjoy the "клоуны у п☆дорасов" status (to use Pelevin's aphorism). So they will be used and abused by the Globalist and you will suffer as much or even more than anybody else.

    Yes, because RusFed was not a victim of Poland so they don’t care and can be more relaxed.
     
    Russians have been on the receiving end of German warfare during both World Wars, but they have no ill will towards Germany. They mostly have no ill will towards US and UK despite the Anglosphere being their main opponent for generations. Russians are naturally a quite forgiving people despite all the propaganda of the Armenian-Jewish RusFed media.

    You seem to care a lot about Old Europe all of a sudden.
     
    I don't like unjust situations. Old Europe has worked its arses off to build EC into EU and now they kind of are pushed around by the EEs who have decided to be loyal Atlanticist henchmen for reasons of historical revanchism and economic opportunism. But this applies to the elites, the normal folks, who mostly are my genetic relatives, are probably not even aware of the roles their nations have been assigned to. Normal folks just want a quiet life.

    Nobody should be dictated to. That’s one thing we should all learn. We should try to approach each other calmly and respectfully but it’s hard during such a horrific war.
     
    We will all be dictated about how we must behave by the Globalist technocrats. They are today's Nomenklatura. They think they know better how we should live our lives. That's the expected behavior of a bunch of highly achieving sociopaths.

    Replies: @LatW, @S

  513. @Sher Singh
    @Barbarossa

    ICEs eat gas in the cold & EVs even worse. Buying them in Northern climes is retarded.
    I've seen ICEs use almost double the Petrol below -15C that they do at 0 on the highway.

    Honda/Toyota literally only want to make Hybrids - PHEV are cool. Fuck battery only,
    More centralized Gov Revenue & Control is a Plus of EVs for the Nigerals.

    Replies: @Barbarossa

    EVs even worse. Buying them in Northern climes is retarded.

    Another technical issue that this reminds me of is that you should charge Lithium Ion batteries in the cold; it kills battery life.

    https://inl.gov/article/electric-vehicles/

    The article alludes to the charging management system limiting charge rate to avoid damage in cold weather, but I wouldn’t be surprised if it decreased total charging cycles in the long run.

    More centralized Gov Revenue & Control is a Plus of EVs for the Nigerals.

    Agreed on that.

  514. @Mikel
    @silviosilver


    There is a comet hurtling towards the earth and you are faced with the following choice: you can either save your own race but the rest of humanity dies or you can save the rest of humanity but your own race dies.
     
    I would choose saving my own race in a heartbeat, of course, although I think I would prefer the choice to be between saving all human females along with myself or saving all human males except for me.

    In fact, I am so selfish that if I learned today that a million people had died in a terrible earthquake in China I would feel sad but I wouldn't have much problem falling asleep at night. On the other hand, if I lost a finger in an accident I would feel more agitated at bedtime.

    But as Adam Smith (the author of this hypothetical) explained, this doesn't really mean that we are incapable of empathy towards distant human beings. It only means that we naturally care more about our immediate things than about the distant ones, which is the rational thing to do in order to function normally in life. He was nevertheless a humanist with very solid moral principles.

    Replies: @silviosilver

    Thank you for replying, and for presumably doing so honestly (since it’s doubtful in the extreme someone, in today’s world, would lie to make himself sound more ‘racist’ or selfish).

    But as Adam Smith (the author of this hypothetical) explained

    Actually, Adam Smith’s hypothetical referred to the entirety of China being swallowed up by an earthquake, implying many times more than a million deaths. I take it that was a step too far you, so you trimmed it down to something more palatable. And that’s fine – it’s your conscience you have to live with.

    It’s not a step too far for me though. In the case of China, I actually would be quite disturbed at the loss. I was a China admirer as a kid, and still think very highly of them, although geopolitical concerns tend to dominate my opinion at present. But the thought that all that would be gone, vanished, never to be seen again, that’s quite disturbing.

    In contrast, and as I’ve said on this site before (which anyone can check to see I’m not just making this up now to ‘compete’ with you in terms of selfishness), if there were some hitherto unknown ‘evolutionary timing’ mechanism that caused everybody of majority African ancestry to drop dead this instant, the only tears of joy that providential event would elicit from me are tears of unrestrained joy.

    I don’t think that’s ‘evil.’ I didn’t cause their extinction. I’m not taking pleasure in their suffering, because they’re not suffering – they’re, poof, gone. Imagine the relief knowing there are now parts of town you formerly wouldn’t have dared set foot in which you can now stroll through freely. Imagine the first time you try it, cautiously inching forward, nervously looking about you, wondering “can it really be true?”, and then the wave of relief that washes over you as you realize that, “why, it is, it is true – free! free at last!” haha. Imagine the relief knowing your ancestral continent is not going to be submerged under an avalanche of monkeyshit. Frankly, if that is ‘evil’, then I don’t want to be ‘good’; but more realistically, anyone who is not a teenage girl should, with a little thought, be able to understand that indifference, while it may form a component of evil, cannot be equated with evil.

    • Thanks: Chebyshev
    • Replies: @AnonfromTN
    @silviosilver

    Your first statement about honesty reminds me of Russian joke
    A Jew arrives to Germany, comes up to a first guy and asks
    - What do you think about Jews?
    The guy answers
    - Jews are a wonderful nation with many talented people…
    The Jew comes to another guy and asks
    - What do you think about Jews?
    The guy answers
    -Jews are a great nation and we Germans are guilty of persecuting them…
    The Jew comes up to a third guy
    -What do you think about Jews?
    The guy answers
    - My views are not typical, but I don’t like Jews
    The Jew says
    - Could you please look after my suitcase for a while?
    - Why me?
    - You are an honest person

  515. @Bashibuzuk
    @Dmitry


    Morality is a separate topic than self-promotion of your tribe, grifting, supporting your perceived self-interest, smelling your own farts.
     
    He might want to correct me if I am wrong, but I am under the subjective impression that for AP (with his Greco-Catholic upbringing in a Patrician Polish-Galician lineage) Christianity is more about its beautiful cathedrals and the fine arts of Christendom's advanced cultures, than about Russian Orthodoxy Fools for Christ (во Христе Юродивые).

    https://blogs.ancientfaith.com/easternchristianinsights/2016/01/24/become-holy-fool-homily-saint-xenia-st-petersburg-fool-christ/

    It is more about human achievement, than human suffering. More about what we gain and less about what we must lose to get lighter to fly closer to God.



    OTOH each of those wretched and gone astray in Downtown Eastside Vancouver have the God's Light in them, all of them Human, all of them Guilty and all of them Innocent.

    May their own suffering and suffering they cause to others bring them closer to final Enlightenment and everlasting Peace. For when we suffer not, we tend to become self-righteous and self-absorbed.

    One needs to read Moscow - Petushki by Venechka Yerofeev to better understand this point.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moscow-Petushki

    Or listen to this beautiful song by Nine Inch Nails in its gorgeous cover by Johnny Cash (who after all was himself a firm believer and a warm receiver).

    https://youtu.be/8AHCfZTRGiI

    Replies: @Dmitry

    more about its beautiful cathedrals and the fine arts of

    Yes this is part of the view, although it is quite mainstream for Americans (unlike raingod view of karma).

    It is stereotypical 20th century disneyland view of Europe, where many immigrants in America want to connect to their ego an idealized world of princesses and castles. I’m not sure it was common in the 19th century, but definitely it is available in 20th century American culture, perhaps emerging partly like compensation while their country was being converted to a bit of disenchanted highway.

    Because immigrants in America could boast their ego in the 20th century with an idealized Disneyland view of Europe of princesses and castles, then it will be inevitable parts of African American culture responded by imagining they were descended from Kings of Egypt and build the pyramids.

    Because we all have the same temptation from ego to pretend they are a special snowflake and 20th century American culture has perhaps lacked the message that it is better to resist your ego, perhaps as teaching too much humility and anti-idealization, was not very aligned with retail and advertising.

    Pride is the most anti-Christian thing, as the original and greatest sin is pride. And pride for your own attainments might be weak enough, but pride for things which are not related to your life (like pride that someone has constructed a large cathedral in Europe a thousand years before you were born) would be especially against the teaching in the New Testament, if you know them.
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Philippians+2%3A1-8&version=AMPC

    Downtown Eastside Vancouver have the God’s Light in them

    And unlike the people in the skyscrapers of Vancouver, they would be lacking at least the difficulty of being a camel trying to go through the eye of the needle, from the view of the bible.

    , all of them Human, all of them Guilty and all of them Innocent.

    We’re now becoming some kind of evangelists walking reading quotes from the bible, but yes the teaching of the bible.
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1+Corinthians+1:27-29
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=James+2%3A2-6

    • Replies: @Bashibuzuk
    @Dmitry

    (63) Jesus said, "There was a rich man who had much money. He said, 'I shall put my money to use so that I may sow, reap, plant, and fill my storehouse with produce, with the result that I shall lack nothing.' Such were his intentions, but that same night he died. Let him who has ears hear."



    (64) Jesus said, "A man had received visitors. And when he had prepared the dinner, he sent his servant to invite the guests.
    He went to the first one and said to him, 'My master invites you.' He said, 'I have claims against some merchants. They are coming to me this evening. I must go and give them my orders. I ask to be excused from the dinner.'
    He went to another and said to him, 'My master has invited you.' He said to him, 'I have just bought a house and am required for the day. I shall not have any spare time.'
    He went to another and said to him, 'My master invites you.' He said to him, 'My friend is going to get married, and I am to prepare the banquet. I shall not be able to come. I ask to be excused from the dinner.'
    He went to another and said to him, 'My master invites you.' He said to him, 'I have just bought a farm, and I am on my way to collect the rent. I shall not be able to come. I ask to be excused.'
    The servant returned and said to his master, 'Those whom you invited to the dinner have asked to be excused.' The master said to his servant, 'Go outside to the streets and bring back those whom you happen to meet, so that they may dine.' Businessmen and merchants will not enter the places of my father."

    http://gnosis.org/naghamm/gthlamb.html

    , @Wokechoke
    @Dmitry

    1000 year old cathedrals?

    Yes the French ethnics should have no pride in Notre Dame. They didn't build it.


    Could you be more of a spiritual Jew than you proved yourself?

  516. Sher Singh says:

    ਸਿਖਮਤਵਿਚਅਕਾਲਪੁਰਖਜੀਦਾਪ੍ਰਤੱਖਦਰਸ਼ਨਗੁਰੂਗ੍ਰੰਥਸਾਹਿਬਜੀਦਾਹੈਅਥਵਾਗੁਰਾਂਸੰਤਾਂਦਾਹੈ।।ਤਥਾਹੀਭਗਵਤੀਦਾਪ੍ਰਤੱਖਧੇਇਸਰੂਪਸ੍ਰੀਸਾਹਿਬਆਦਿਕਸ਼ਸਤ੍ਰਾਂਅਸਤ੍ਰਾਂਦਾਦਰਸ਼ਨਹੈ।।

    (In Sikh Mat) To view the Sargun (physical) form of Akal Purakh look towards Sri Guru Granth Sahib Ji, as well as, Sants.
    Like this, the Sargun form of Bhagvati (Devi/Chandi, War Goddess) is Weapons (Astra-Shastra)
    Missile and Melee.

    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ

  517. @Bashibuzuk
    @LatW


    As to the economic connectivity, before 2020 and within the security arrangement that lasted until 2022, the trade between the EU and Russia was increasing, Russia’s export structure was starting to change from just raw material to more of actual product and Ukraine, too, started trading more. Everyone was benefiting. Had the RusFed not made the ultimatum in December 2021, this would have continued to everyone’s benefit (despite the problems started in 2014).
     
    I think this is precisely why this whole thing happened. The Great Reset is about causing economic downturn during the fourth industrial revolution transition to preserve the limited natural ressources for those future generations of genetic lineages whom will get past the current population bottleneck, while NATO is of course about "keeping Germans down, keeping Russians out and keeping Americans in". Combine both and you get the picture.

    We have two global projects for the posthuman/transhuman future of mankind: the ones of the Chinese elites and the Globalized West elites. Only one of these projects will prevail.

    RusFed tried to ride on both trains and sit on both chairs at once. As usual with Pynya, it was more about indecision than about strategic ambivalence (RusFed has no strategy it is led by Noviops who only do tactical moves).

    So after 2012 and Pynya's coming back and clinging to power, the Globalized West has chosen to act in order to prevent both Ukraine and RusFed from either emerging as a unified economic space and/or joining OBOR. Remember that offers of "Reset" in US and RusFed relations have been made to Medvedev and seemingly moved forward until Pynya came back. Possibly, the 2008 financial and the 2012 economic crisis also did not help. A sense of urgency might have prevailed among the Atlanticist elite back then during the Maidan.


    These kinds of projects of massive global scale (same as the USSR), in order to work, need to be created in a way that every participant’s interests are protected and their needs are met. Not through domination because that doesn’t work on the micro level. When you invite large stakeholders such as China, you need to consider everyone’s interests. Not just interests of German businesses or Russian / Chinese oligarchs.
     
    These massive projects actually all end up in the way of the Babel Tower, they crumble while the multitudes that built them divide and dissolve. That is unless and until it remains held together by brute force and/or very strong metaphysics. Elites always think that their attempt is different and cannot be compared to the historical records, but since times immemorial it always ends the same. There will be no Heaven on Earth built by Elites' Decree.

    Poland wants peace in the region so it can continue to thrive. Poland et al want a space where their own can develop, where they themselves are given priority and not outsiders (who ever they may be).
     
    Poland and others in the region have an axe to grind with those who have dominated them in the past. It is the result of both a national trauma and a national superiority complex. When Poles are honest, they usually recognize as much. I had a couple of Polish friends with whom I got along rather well (we had a similar type of humor) and they candidly admitted that when it comes to Russians they have a hard time remaining rational. Interestingly enough, it is not the case at all in RusFed where people have a very balanced attitude towards Poland, and if educated enough usually appreciate Polish literature, movies and music. Im general, Russians usually do not see Poles or Balts as inferior or inherently hostile.

    The military equipment is sourced from several countries that are the main global producers. Germany, US, Israel, South Korea, Sweden, Finland, Turkey, those being the top producers of the best weapons and there is a limited number of producers who can deliver the required amount in a limited time frame for the best price. Germany put her military production on the back burner for many years and Germany is also reluctant to sell for political reasons (which is understandable). Afaik, the German tanks are also more expensive and not as readily available.
     
    Sure, but they get their subsidies' moneys from EU, mostly from Western European's taxpayers taxes or the inflation that all the EU citizens have to absorb when EU Central Banks print moneys out of thin air. They should promote and prefer EU industries and EU countries MIC. But they buy Korean or in the case of future nuclear stations American companies. It is not the way old EC used to work when they built Airbus or other great European industries. It is as if Eastern Euros are here for the subsidies, but not for the economic cooperation that might favor Old Europe. It is a selfish attitude.

    We don’t know how the chips will fall. One must learn from history and it is certainly tempting to draw these comparisons, but, as Heraclitus said, you cannot step in the same river twice, panta rei – everything flows, everything is in a flux, everything is a struggle.
     
    Agreed.

    Did you ask the Dubliners (will their job be to provide Guinness?) and the Siberians? As to Han Chinese characteristics, if that’s what the majority of Russians want… alas, it’s their land.
     
    Nobody wants this, but it might occur nevertheless. As I wrote earlier, we have to choose between two Globalist projects. The Chinese is one of those.

    Poland is now Germany’s 5th largest trading partner (Poland recently surpassed Italy that way), so their trade volumes are consistently high. Germany doesn’t object.
     
    The problem is not economic, but political. Germany doesn't have to be dictated by Poland or Eastern European EU members in general. Old Europe will not stand it. Eastern European EU members might end up learning it the hard way.

    Replies: @LatW, @Barbarossa, @Beckow

    We have two global projects for the posthuman/transhuman future of mankind: the ones of the Chinese elites and the Globalized West elites. Only one of these projects will prevail.

    Personally I’m hoping that neither will prevail. All of the above seem only inhuman and dead in the final estimation. I’m more than happy to live on the margins and keep to humanity 1.0 if one of them does become dominant.

    they crumble while the multitudes that built them divide and dissolve. That is unless and until it remains held together by brute force and/or very strong metaphysics.

    My observation tells me that this process is well underway in the US. The US is destined for either totalitarianism or authoritarianism since the raw human material capable of democracy or republicanism is largely gone. However, the high levels of basic dysfunction will make it fairly hobbled in it’s ambitions. But yeah, I agree that utopias, especially top down ones, are a pipe dream that end badly. The Czars were repressive autocrats, but what came after made them look positively benign.

    we have to choose between two Globalist projects.

    As Rush put it, “If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.”

    • Agree: Bashibuzuk
  518. Turned on the truck and heard NPR for a few minutes and they were non-ironically having a very earnest discussion of whether dogs could be racist and what the implications of that are.

    Every time I think they’ve really jumped the shark, they go and jump another one…

    • Agree: Mikel
  519. @Coconuts
    @Dmitry


    We live in a century where, because of technology (transport technology in the most basic level) and economic structure, a significant portion of the world’s population will move between countries. So, even while you can dislike the moving of people, globalization that will only increase this century, the regions people move is showing information about real differences in life in these countries with the sense of Francis Galton’s “wisdom of crowds”.
     
    I remember hearing a French Marxist economist (iirc) sketch this out 20 years ago, he seems to have predicted things with some accuracy. But, increasing concentration and centralisation of capital combined with growing importance of a minority of experts/technocrats doesn't seem to be necessarily the best solution for overall development of a population, even if it is inevitable. There are benefits from being in a country with a lot of very rich people and some of the foremost world technocrats, but it means the lives of the rest of the population are likely to become both highly dependent on and controlled by this international elite. This other part of the population has relatively low value except in their capacity of service to those who control this accumulation of financial wealth and expertise; they can always be replaced by immigrants from poorer parts of the world.



    It doesn't seem surprising that if more highly wealthy people and high productivity experts move into the UK, more of wealth production and GDP will be down to them (I guess earnings from the wealth they place in British banks and its management will count as UK GDP). Demographic change may explain future low productivity in the other parts of the population as the current segments of it with low educational attainment grow in relative number.

    This is why in the future some more average European person may prefer to live in a country more like Poland, where wealth production is more widely shared through the population and there won't be this level of stratification combined with significant ethnic diversity.

    Replies: @Dmitry

    very rich people and some of the foremost world technocrats, but it means the lives of the rest of the population are likely to become both highly dependent

    It could even be negative effects for the country to receive the wealthy immigrants. I’m not saying it is negative, but it is possible that it could be negative net. But I’m saying movement of those people to the country, is an indicator of positive aspects of the country, such as the stable legal and political system.

    Animals are responding before there is an earthquake. Rich people are moving from what feels like more unstable ground to more stable ground. It’s when you see the rich people are emigrating from your country that you know you are going to be in problems soon. Rich people are not usually stupid. Sometimes they know more than we.

    Poland, where wealth production is more widely shared through the population

    UK has many world level companies of the native origin and has a lot of the local entrepreneur culture with its engineers. English are some of the best engineers in the world, the most talented inventors.

    Whereas in Poland, the successful companies, are mainly foreign like Volkswagen, Lidl, Tesco. There isn’t much of local industry of world class in areas I know (perhaps there is something who knows more than my superficial opinion).

    Poland is going to be coupled as junior to Germany, which is not the worse situation, depending how Germany’s economy will be. But you know being dependent for foreign companies.

    productivity in the other parts of the population as the current segments of it with low educational attainment grow in relative number.

    Except America, the highest level of education is in UK. Although there are problems like stagnating proportion of GDP for R&D. Still the best universities and researchers outside USA are in UK. British have order of magnitude more Nobel prizes in science than countries like Poland.

    If you consider the problems of globalization and technological dystopia. Perhaps it is a plane which might be crashing. But the countries which are more likely to survive, will be closer to the pilot, where you will know about the problems first, understand the system from inside.

    Modernity is maybe going to destroy everyone. We are all going to have problems. But the people near the pilot have the better chance to survive. If Tuvans and Native Americans are the most far from modernity, they had the least defense. Tuvans and Native Americans have already been destroyed by the modern time.

    England is the opposite. It is where internet was invented. It is origin of Alan Turing, Ada Lovelace, Charles Babbage. It is significantly the architect of modernity. They are the second country for Nobel Prizes. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nobel_laureates_by_country#United_Kingdom It’s possibly going to be one of the more resilient societies in this century as they are one of the nationalities which is driving modernity.

  520. Bashibuzuk says:
    @LatW
    @Bashibuzuk


    I think this is precisely why this whole thing happened.
     
    Well, the simple truth is that the resources that the RusFed wanted to take over belong to Ukraine. And you can argue that others would've vied for them, but the truth is that Ukraine was ramping up the production of grain and other products, as well as producing tech, that was benefiting everyone. Why did it have to be stopped? There is terrible ruin now in the East (nobody was going to take over the Eastern Ukraine, we just needed it as a buffer).

    The Great Reset is about causing economic downturn during the fourth industrial revolution transition to preserve the limited natural ressources for those future generations of genetic lineages whom will get past the current population bottleneck, while NATO is of course about “keeping Germans down, keeping Russians out and keeping Americans in”. Combine both and you get the picture.
     
    Well, if they want to preserve resources, hypothetically, for some future group of select or limited genetic lineages, then even more so, they should avoid open wars, but try to take over via trade, mergers, acquisitions, etc. There is now environmental damage, too. I think that Putin just wanted to take over Ukraine's resources, before anyone else does. He saw that Ukraine was leaving so he tried to grab what he can.

    As to NATO, the problem there, is that, from the POV of Ukrainians and some other Russia's neighbors, NATO, most likely, would've reacted somewhat mildly to a Russian takeover of Donbas. This would have been a position favored by some Western Euros. Obviously, the Western continentals here on this forum support it. There would've been a reaction, but insufficient to make any real difference. Ukraine would've been left on its own with that problem, essentially. Whereas with an outright invasion, the West saw it as more of a threat and, because Ukraine managed to fight back, the West granted support. Had this not happened it'd be business as usual and Russia could've continued its creeping annexations. It's actually a sign of treachery against Ukraine, but the trade and political dialogue would've continued.

    We have two global projects for the posthuman/transhuman future of mankind: the ones of the Chinese elites and the Globalized West elites. Only one of these projects will prevail.
     
    You think it really will be "transhuman"? You think human beings want to live that way?

    Well, don't you think both of those Globalist projects are dependent on each other? I didn't read Xi's speech, but I heard that he was kind of calling for a bipolar world again. Meaning, China and the West. If it will be so and if it will be strictly delineated, then those on your side, who are not willing to stay under China and want to be closer to us, will still be separated from us, which is really lame.

    As usual with Pynya, it was more about indecision than about strategic ambivalence (RusFed has no strategy it is led by Noviops who only do tactical moves).
     
    Pynya is indecisive, but at least he's cautious and knows how to play the long game (until now). It just didn't work because of the internal corruption (and the continuous siphoning of cash overseas, which is, ofc, the result of non-strategic thinking or at least not the right kind of it).

    So after 2012 and Pynya’s coming back and clinging to power, the Globalized West has chosen to act in order to prevent both Ukraine and RusFed from either emerging as a unified economic space and/or joining OBOR
     
    It started with the Munich speech in 2007. And Ukraine was always divided. But you're right that to keep him on for so long was probably a mistake from Russia's POV. But he was still at the peak of his popularity even back in 2012? In the meantime, right around that time, I remember, around 2010 or so, that the clampdown on ethnonats became very harsh. And, ofc, everyone else, too, so there was no political alternative.

    A sense of urgency might have prevailed among the Atlanticist elite back then during the Maidan.

     

    On the other hand, the Western approach towards Ukraine has been slow, reluctant, gradual, not all that interested, frankly. I think that only when the West saw that Ukraine can fight then they became truly interested in Ukraine. Because even after the Maidan there was reluctance to help improve Ukraine for further investment (even for the Baltic businesses Ukraine was difficult, you had to build a more favorable investment environment with stronger rule of law, that's tedious work, and help them but it was slowly starting to take place). I was actually quite optimistic about Russia at the time as well, because I saw the profile of Russian business change slightly (it changed from the more flashy пальцы веером type of culture to more "hipster" like with a genuine Russian cultural twist which I really liked.

    That is unless and until it remains held together by brute force and/or very strong metaphysics.
     
    The issue is that neither one of those is wanted anymore these days. So one must either live with what is currently available, or create some alternative metaphysics. Or re-invigorate something old.

    Poland and others in the region have an axe to grind with those who have dominated them in the past
     
    .

    Mostly they just want to be left alone (but also for Ukraine to be left alone). Everyone just wants to be treated as an equal but that's not what you guys want. You both want to be above. But you can't do that in our space. We're not asking for much.

    it is not the case at all in RusFed where people have a very balanced attitude towards Poland
     
    Yes, because RusFed was not a victim of Poland so they don't care and can be more relaxed.

    Sure, but they get their subsidies’ moneys from EU, mostly from Western European’s taxpayers taxes or the inflation that all the EU citizens have to absorb when EU Central Banks print moneys out of thin air.
     
    The EEs have to absorb this inflation, too. And the subsidies are only one aspect of this, the EU is very deeply integrated by now, as I said, the trade volumes and all sorts of mutual projects are just way too lucrative for the West to give up. Some companies invest 30 years ahead. They've had a good run. Remember that they got to utilize the human capital that came out of the 80s. Don't be naive, they got it good. Otherwise they simply wouldn't be there.

    They should promote and prefer EU industries and EU countries MIC.
     
    Well, ideally, this should be the case, the EU should be united and countries should support each other. But Western EU countries also don't just preference the East, they trade with the whole world. It's something that might be an ideal, but it doesn't comply with the reality on the ground, the EU is not like the USSR that way. And, as I said, the weapons industry is quite specific, the goods are very expensive and you have to look for the best deal. Because you have to be accountable to the EE taxpayer as well (the defense ministry gets grilled constantly by the media and the public about their spending).

    It is not the way old EC used to work when they built Airbus or other great European industries

     

    The old EC was different and didn't have access to EE at all.

    It is as if Eastern Euros are here for the subsidies, but not for the economic cooperation that might favor Old Europe. It is a selfish attitude.
     
    That's not fully accurate, there is a ton of economic cooperation, the EEs have made concessions and given up a lot of their own market share. Ideally, there should be a mutual benefit (in most cases there is). You seem to care a lot about Old Europe all of a sudden. I thought you cared more about your genetic brethren. 😔

    Nobody wants this, but it might occur nevertheless.
     
    I know for sure that the ethnonats strictly don't want it. Hard to say about the majority of the population.

    Germany doesn’t have to be dictated by Poland or Eastern European EU members in general.
     
    Nobody should be dictated to. That's one thing we should all learn. We should try to approach each other calmly and respectfully but it's hard during such a horrific war.

    Not sure about those tanks though, maybe the Germans themselves didn't want to sell them, it looks like the price and availability was the main issue, but who knows. Poland should build its own defense industry.

    Sorry for the length (and for taking up so much of your time).

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

    the resources that the RusFed wanted to take over belong to Ukraine

    I was referring to the overall trend in downsizing the natural ressources consumption under the circular economy promoted as part of the fourth industrial revolution. They believe in balancing human consumption with the overall ressources of the biosphere. At least as long as we don’t have sufficient energy to and technological advances for an access to Solar System’s ressources.

    OTOH, there’s not that much ressources that RusFed would have wanted to take over in Ukraine. Black soils for agricultural purposes and human ressources come to mind along with what was left of Soviet technology in aerospace and some other high tech fields. And all that was accessible under the agreement for Eurasian Economic Union. Remember that RusFed offered EU to have tripartite discussions with Ukraine in 2013, an offer EU declined.

    [MORE]

    they should avoid open wars, but try to take over via trade, mergers, acquisitions, etc.

    A simple manner to restrict ressources consumption is through outright depopulation. Remember the bison slaughter on the Great Plains to force the bison hunting tribes off the land and into the reservations. Today, warfare and ensuing technosphere, electric grid and overall damage to industry would play the same role. Force the “wrong people” out of the land as refugees and drop their already low birth rate. Then in a couple of generations (this is the time the fourth industrial revolution transition would take according to Chubais) you can take this land and give it to the “right people”.

    Whereas with an outright invasion, the West saw it as more of a threat and, because Ukraine managed to fight back, the West granted support. Had this not happened it’d be business as usual and Russia could’ve continued its creeping annexations.

    Pynya got tricked just like Saddam in Koweit. For whatever reason (probably some backdoor deal with some global elite faction) he thought that the SMO would go as smoothly in Ukraine as it did in Kazakhstan. Why he believed it is a mystery, perhaps he has been promised an anti-Zelensky coup in Ukraine? And he was ready and willing to push back Donbass rebel regions into a federated Ukraine under the Minsk 2 agreement.

    What is truly amazing is his anti-NATO ultimatum. He couldn’t have possibly thought that NATO would seriously discuss it. It was monumental chutzpah which is not the way he usually behaves. There is something mysterious about this topic, some information we will probably never know.

    You think it really will be “transhuman”? You think human beings want to live that way?

    The plebs will be forced to live in a human anthill like manner under a Big Data social score system in smart cities. The plebs will stop reproducing, but that would be a feature not a bug. The elite would enjoy a far greater lifespan, better health and enhanced cognitive capabilities. They will have an infinitely higher standard of living compared to the masses if plebs. Then after a few generations, the human population would reach a technological level that would allow humans to colonize Solar System, while the biosphere would be restored and the plebs would mostly perish in their smart city “mouse utopia” (as per Calhoun’s Universe 25).

    Well, don’t you think both of those Globalist projects are dependent on each other?

    Yes they are, it is a false dichotomy just like Communism vs Capitalism in the previous Cold War. Two roads leading to the same cliff (to use Shafarevich’s book title). But in the end the question would be who is in control: the Globalized Western elites or the CCP Nomenklatura? That is what the fighting will be all about, not some “human rights” BS.

    then those on your side, who are not willing to stay under China and want to be closer to us, will still be separated from us, which is really lame.

    Those “on my side” want nothing to do with any type of Globalist agenda, either Western or Chinese. They are both inhumane and will both most probably lead to catastrophic consequences in the end. Those “on my side ” are to be found all around the world, China included. Most people want to stay human and have a somewhat meaningful normal human life. Transhumanists and Technofetishists are few and far between. Nevertheless, the silent majority will most probably end up forced to live under the Globalist managed system. And it will mean its genetic lineages elimination from the global gene pool after a few generations.

    It started with the Munich speech in 2007.

    According to Klaus Schwab, Pynya was a WEF Young Global Leader since his early years in politics. They probably assigned him the role of the “Russian Ubervilain” to be feared by the Western middle class. A middle class sheeple distracted by Pynya’s antics, while being carefully and patiently downsized and corralled fowards extinction.

    The issue is that neither one of those is wanted anymore these days. So one must either live with what is currently available, or create some alternative metaphysics. Or re-invigorate something old.

    This is true. We need re-invigorated metaphysics. I think we will not manage to preserve human civilization without it. All the Transhumanist claims to the opposite non withstanding. They believe in deus ex machina but their “gods” are “technological demons”. We need to bring back human archetypes of the higher kind from the collective subconscious to oppose the Technosphere and its pseudo-sentient entities.

    Mostly they just want to be left alone (but also for Ukraine to be left alone). Everyone just wants to be treated as an equal but that’s not what you guys want. You both want to be above. But you can’t do that in our space. We’re not asking for much.

    Unfortunately, you will not be left alone, nobody will. Anyway, your elites clearly enjoy the “клоуны у п☆дорасов” status (to use Pelevin’s aphorism). So they will be used and abused by the Globalist and you will suffer as much or even more than anybody else.

    Yes, because RusFed was not a victim of Poland so they don’t care and can be more relaxed.

    Russians have been on the receiving end of German warfare during both World Wars, but they have no ill will towards Germany. They mostly have no ill will towards US and UK despite the Anglosphere being their main opponent for generations. Russians are naturally a quite forgiving people despite all the propaganda of the Armenian-Jewish RusFed media.

    You seem to care a lot about Old Europe all of a sudden.

    I don’t like unjust situations. Old Europe has worked its arses off to build EC into EU and now they kind of are pushed around by the EEs who have decided to be loyal Atlanticist henchmen for reasons of historical revanchism and economic opportunism. But this applies to the elites, the normal folks, who mostly are my genetic relatives, are probably not even aware of the roles their nations have been assigned to. Normal folks just want a quiet life.

    Nobody should be dictated to. That’s one thing we should all learn. We should try to approach each other calmly and respectfully but it’s hard during such a horrific war.

    We will all be dictated about how we must behave by the Globalist technocrats. They are today’s Nomenklatura. They think they know better how we should live our lives. That’s the expected behavior of a bunch of highly achieving sociopaths.

    • Thanks: S
    • Replies: @LatW
    @Bashibuzuk


    They believe in balancing human consumption with the overall resources of the biosphere.
     
    Surely, it seems like eventually there will be shortages and there is degradation of natural resources, but the world population will soon be shrinking on its own. There will be pressure though for sure.

    Today, warfare and ensuing technosphere, electric grid and overall damage to industry would play the same role. Force the “wrong people” out of the land as refugees and drop their already low birth rate.
     
    I understand. There will be a major depopulated area in the place of East Ukraine, where there used to be thriving cities. There is hope though that eventually some refugees could return. It's also possible that the Ukrainians who go to Canada will have a baby boom (if the husbands join). Some EEs have a small baby boom when they move to the West. Ofc, that sucks for Ukraine anyway (since those will be cute little English speaking babies).

    Then in a couple of generations (this is the time the fourth industrial revolution transition would take according to Chubais) you can take this land and give it to the “right people”.
     
    Who would be the "right people"? Btw, have you heard this meme that used to go around the Russian patriot community about how Chubais or some other 90s "liberal" believes that Russia only needs something like 40M people to "service the pipe"?

    Pynya got tricked just like Saddam in Koweit. For whatever reason (probably some backdoor deal with some global elite faction) he thought that the SMO would go as smoothly in Ukraine as it did in Kazakhstan. Why he believed it is a mystery,
     
    To believe it would be like Kazakhstan is utterly delusional. Shockingly delusional and it would be a Russian elite that I simply would not recognize anymore. Why are these f**ers so different from every Russian government before?? If they thought that it means they truly live in their detached hybrid reality bubble. The media, too, is removed from reality and for all to see.

    perhaps he has been promised an anti-Zelensky coup in Ukraine?
     
    It's not as easy to organize as it might seem. Besides, removing him may not even change things that much as Ukrainians had already made up their minds.

    What is truly amazing is his anti-NATO ultimatum. He couldn’t have possibly thought that NATO would seriously discuss it. It was monumental chutzpah which is not the way he usually behaves. There is something mysterious about this topic, some information we will probably never know.
     
    I agree, this is very mysterious, and I often ponder what it was all about. It was really far out and not in line with the usual Kremlin approaches. The only thing that came to my mind is that Russia obviously regretted letting go of certain arrangements too easily and that Russia wanted to revisit or backtrack things. Which is understandable, given the chaos of the late 80s and early 90s. But it's still far fetched to expect it in that format. Maybe it's just because Pynya is old and he wants to leave a legacy, something like the crashing of "the US led world order" or a re-assembling of the Warsaw Pact, but it's still too far out. Or - he was going to issue this utlimatum, invade Ukraine and then invade further. If the terms of the ultimatum are not met. He may have thought the Ukrainian troops would come to the Russian side.


    But in the end the question would be who is in control: the Globalized Western elites or the CCP Nomenklatura?
     
    Neither of them is too appealing, tbh. Not the people, but some of the elites.

    We need to bring back human archetypes of the higher kind
     
    I agree, these archetypes are still floating around.

    despite Armenian-Jewish RusFed media

     

    They gotta do something about that, though... hopefully, soon there will be a chance and it will happen.

    Old Europe has worked its arses off to build EC into EU
     
    Well, as I said, Western Europe benefitted from the enlargement. It may not be admitted on the kind of forum such as this one, but in more mainstream society this is an accepted belief. Again, one can question it, but, had the opposite been the case, the enlargement would not have happened. The West held way too many cards. And, btw, RusFed supported it, too.

    and now they kind of are pushed around by the EEs who have decided to be loyal Atlanticist henchmen for reasons of historical revanchism and economic opportunism.

     

    Well, the EEs loyalty to the US/UK may have remained a nuisance if it wasn't for such a large war. Everyone was taken aback by it as no one really expected it. They thought they'd be able to live with a security vacuum forever and just trade and built mutual projects.
    , @S
    @Bashibuzuk


    Those “on my side ” are to be found all around the world, China included. Most people want to stay human and have a somewhat meaningful normal human life...Nevertheless, the silent majority will most probably end up forced to live under the Globalist managed system. And it will mean its genetic lineages elimination from the global gene pool after a few generations.
     
    This is a valid point.

    A well provided for geographic space designated just for refugees should have been created long ago.

    Similarly, there are clearly those who simply are indifferent, or, are even hostile to the idea of race, ethnicity, or identity. A place with abundant natural resources (and amply documenting that fact from the start) should have been set aside just for them. Every people could have contributed something of significance to it.

    There, if their ideas are correct, ie 'everyone is just the same' and 'love conquers all', they could of set an example for the rest of the world. If they were wrong, that too could have been an example for the world.

    As it has been, as you have alluded, the 'majority' who do care about things regarding race and ethnicity, have been being forced by diktat to give up their identities. This was never fair to them. What I described above would have been fair to both the universalists and those who care about identity.

    Of course, if someone wished to acquire total world power for themselves, they could never tolerate such a thing.

    Yes they are, it is a false dichotomy just like Communism vs Capitalism in the previous Cold War. Two roads leading to the same cliff (to use Shafarevich’s book title).
     
    Below is a picture of arm in arm American and Soviet soldiers, these being the respective representatives of the armies of the then flagship states of Capitalism and Communism, taken near the close of the war in Torgau, Germany in late April, 1945.

    It is highly symbolic in many ways of the manufactured and broadly controlled (crimethink, I know) Capitalist artificial hyper-individualist thesis vs the Communist artificial hyper-collectivist anti-thesis dialectic, and their coming together in global Multi-Cultural synthesis.

    While I seriously doubt the soldiers and photographers involved in taking such pics understood the dialectical significance of such imagery, there is little doubt that the upper echelons of the elites and their hangers on who ordered such be made (and propagated) surely did.


    https://www.historyplace.com/worldwar2/defeat/downfall-us-russians.jpg

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

  521. Bashibuzuk says:
    @Dmitry
    @Bashibuzuk


    more about its beautiful cathedrals and the fine arts of
     
    Yes this is part of the view, although it is quite mainstream for Americans (unlike raingod view of karma).

    It is stereotypical 20th century disneyland view of Europe, where many immigrants in America want to connect to their ego an idealized world of princesses and castles. I'm not sure it was common in the 19th century, but definitely it is available in 20th century American culture, perhaps emerging partly like compensation while their country was being converted to a bit of disenchanted highway.

    Because immigrants in America could boast their ego in the 20th century with an idealized Disneyland view of Europe of princesses and castles, then it will be inevitable parts of African American culture responded by imagining they were descended from Kings of Egypt and build the pyramids.

    Because we all have the same temptation from ego to pretend they are a special snowflake and 20th century American culture has perhaps lacked the message that it is better to resist your ego, perhaps as teaching too much humility and anti-idealization, was not very aligned with retail and advertising.

    Pride is the most anti-Christian thing, as the original and greatest sin is pride. And pride for your own attainments might be weak enough, but pride for things which are not related to your life (like pride that someone has constructed a large cathedral in Europe a thousand years before you were born) would be especially against the teaching in the New Testament, if you know them.
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Philippians+2%3A1-8&version=AMPC

    Downtown Eastside Vancouver have the God’s Light in them
     
    And unlike the people in the skyscrapers of Vancouver, they would be lacking at least the difficulty of being a camel trying to go through the eye of the needle, from the view of the bible.

    , all of them Human, all of them Guilty and all of them Innocent.

     

    We're now becoming some kind of evangelists walking reading quotes from the bible, but yes the teaching of the bible.
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1+Corinthians+1:27-29
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=James+2%3A2-6

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk, @Wokechoke

    (63) Jesus said, “There was a rich man who had much money. He said, ‘I shall put my money to use so that I may sow, reap, plant, and fill my storehouse with produce, with the result that I shall lack nothing.’ Such were his intentions, but that same night he died. Let him who has ears hear.”

    [MORE]

    (64) Jesus said, “A man had received visitors. And when he had prepared the dinner, he sent his servant to invite the guests.
    He went to the first one and said to him, ‘My master invites you.’ He said, ‘I have claims against some merchants. They are coming to me this evening. I must go and give them my orders. I ask to be excused from the dinner.’
    He went to another and said to him, ‘My master has invited you.’ He said to him, ‘I have just bought a house and am required for the day. I shall not have any spare time.’
    He went to another and said to him, ‘My master invites you.’ He said to him, ‘My friend is going to get married, and I am to prepare the banquet. I shall not be able to come. I ask to be excused from the dinner.’
    He went to another and said to him, ‘My master invites you.’ He said to him, ‘I have just bought a farm, and I am on my way to collect the rent. I shall not be able to come. I ask to be excused.’
    The servant returned and said to his master, ‘Those whom you invited to the dinner have asked to be excused.’ The master said to his servant, ‘Go outside to the streets and bring back those whom you happen to meet, so that they may dine.’ Businessmen and merchants will not enter the places of my father.

    http://gnosis.org/naghamm/gthlamb.html

    • Agree: Barbarossa
  522. @Bashibuzuk
    @LatW


    The truth is – for Balto-Slav, neither the Byzantine despotism nor the German Ordnung are the best. There has to be our own way, that is best for our own mentality and temperament. It is something in between of those two and something really special that we must seek.
     
    I agree.

    The peasant population of the Tsarist Empire suffered tremendously under the domination of the Westernized Imperial elites. The Empire-building process has been a tragedy for the Russian muzhiks. That is why the muzhik turned his weapons against the Imperial State as soon as he could in 1917. That is why he raided the palaces and country houses of the Tsarist elite, killing their owners every time he could. He saw them as tyrants and tyrants they were.



    Instead of the Westernized Empire, the muzhik wanted a community that would manage local life along the usual lines of the peasant communal organization: Mir, he thought that they could manage their affairs without external intervention: "мы тут сами, миром решим" (we would decide ourselves here, as a community - peacefully).

    Somewhere far, the muzhik wanted a wise and benevolent chief, a father figure, a priestly intellectual who would spend his days and nights thinking of the greater good, while abstaining from any self-serving considerations.

    And in between this high spirited leader and his community, the muzhik wanted strong and just men, true heroes, fearless warriors deciding what is just in councils of equals and applying the law mercilessly to everyone without exception.

    That is all of course a very primitive social organization pattern: a Priestly King / a Warrior Caste / a peasant clan living of the land. It was pre-industrial, perhaps even pre-historical. And of course it was used against the poor and naive peasants as soon as they disarmed after the end of the Civil War.

    Instead of the Higher Priestley King, they got Stalin. Instead of the heroic Warrior Caste they got the sadistic NKVD, and instead the local community they got the kolkhoz enslavement.

    Better be careful about what we dream of. Dreams might turn to nightmares.

    Ataman Krasnov, was among the rare White Guard leaders who thought that the muzhik really needed two things: a strong local autonomy up to the regional level and a strong Tsar that might balance the differences and harmonize the interests between the communities for a greater good. His ideal was basically the confederation of Cossack Stanitzas under the rule of a popular Tsar (мужицкий Царь). But most White Guard officers were not monarchists, they were more often than not center-left democrats. And the muzhik did not (and doesn't until this very day) understand democracy.

    So going back to what would be best for Balto-Slav as social organization: IMO it would be a confederation with a strong local self administration and a center that would basically have the duty and power to ensure defense against the internal enemies (organized crime mostly and corrupt bureaucracy), and the external foes (anyone who would attempt to harm the Balto-Slav populations).

    It would be in short a Balto-Slav Union of Republics with a strong common defense and law enforcement forces, but with maximum local religious, cultural and economic independence.

    But perhaps it is too idealistic and would end up again in tyranny and in ensuing turmoil.

    Replies: @AP, @LatW

    So going back to what would be best for Balto-Slav as social organization: IMO it would be a confederation with a strong local self administration and a center that would basically have the duty and power to ensure defense against the internal enemies

    This is not unlike the PLC. Novgorod was destroyed because it was considering joining.

  523. @Dmitry
    @AP


    Why Hindu? As you know
     
    Sure, Hindu is a religion with sophisticated theology, which I would not insult. Your views seem more like something Aztec or belief in rain gods.

    there is a real estate boom in the West
     
    So, you would believe the area which experiences this property boom and asset increase are therefore becoming further from entering the Kingdom of Heaven, in the New Testament.

    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Mark%2010:24-26&version=KJ21
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=James+5%3A1-5&version=ESV
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=James+2%3A5&version=ESV
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke+1%3A53&version=ESV
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke+6%3A20-21&version=ESV
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke+12%3A33


    is being most devastated by

     

    Being most devastated, suffering and persecuted is not indicator of unrighteousness, in the New Testament teaching. It's not Hinduism or belief in rain gods. Cross is a symbol of suffering.

    If you have a comfortable time, with none persecuting you, without suffering, this is the time you would be worried as you do not carry the cross, as precondition for anyone who follows Jesus is carrying a Cross and having persecutions, as they write constantly.

    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew%2010:37-39&version=KJ21
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2+Timothy+3%3A12-12&version=NIV
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1+Peter+4%3A13-14&version=AMP


    Putin and polls consistently show that Russians support the war.
     
    And the polls in Cuba, will show Cuba has the best healthcare system in the world.

    Putin.. are popular among Russians
     
    You were promoting him to us. https://www.unz.com/akarlin/russias-nationalist-turn/#comment-4928594

    Why?

     

    Mainly Western Europeans are supporting the refugees, whether you think this is a good idea or not from the political view, because they feel compassion for the victims of the war (although of course there is also some virtue signaling there). It's morality for them and for this reason doesn't match exactly following of rational self-interest.

    And whether you agree with him or not, for Jesus (which is a part of the cultural basis for Western Europe), he emphasized especially help of the outsider who is specifically from not your tribe or religion. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke%2010%3A25-37&version=NIV

    Morality is a separate topic than self-promotion of your tribe, grifting, supporting your perceived self-interest, smelling your own farts.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk, @AP

    Your views seem more like something Aztec or belief in rain gods

    Aztec demons demanded mass human sacrifice of innocents.

    Terrible things happen to communities because they have collectively engaged in sin.

    How are these similar?

    Medieval Christians explained the Mongol invasion as a divine punishment for sins.

    So, you would believe the area which experiences this property boom and asset increase are therefore becoming further from entering the Kingdom of Heaven, in the New Testament

    I do not belong to a Protestant sect that believes the Bible is more important than the Church. One can quote passages to support all kinds of claims but the Church has different conclusions:

    https://www.goarch.org/-/orthodox-christian-wealth-and-stewardship

    Putin and polls consistently show that Russians support the war.

    And the polls in Cuba, will show Cuba has the best healthcare system in the world

    Do Cubans think so? Because most Russians do like Putin and do support the war. This support has eroded only because Russians are experiencing mass mobilization. This means that most Russians didn’t mind invading Ukraine and slaughtering its people but they mind getting killed themselves.

    Putin.. are popular among Russians

    You were promoting him to us

    Until he started the invasion and mass killing of Ukrainians. Russians still like him though.

    “is being most devastated by”

    Being most devastated, suffering and persecuted is not indicator of unrighteousness, in the New Testament teaching

    It suggests a need to suffer in order to expunge one’s sins. A community that has fallen into sin is in greater need to “carry a cross” than one that has not. It is an opportunity for redemption.

    When the Holy Inquisition burned heretics it was for the purpose of their salvation.

    Religious Catholics who suffer chronic pain will often find meaning in their experience by viewing it as an opportunity to pay for their sins and thereby reduce their stay in purgatory. This does not necessarily mean that they were bad people personally. We are mortal and will die as a consequence of the original sin.

    • Replies: @silviosilver
    @AP


    When the Holy Inquisition burned heretics it was for the purpose of their salvation.
     
    I have never heard of such a thing. Heretics were persecuted lest they infect the rest of the flock with their incorrect beliefs and thus imperil their immortal souls. I think the copey idea that heretics were burned for their own good is something you've invented. Prove me wrong.

    Religious Catholics who suffer chronic pain will often find meaning in their experience by viewing it as an opportunity to pay for their sins and thereby reduce their stay in purgatory.
     
    Yeah okay, but given an actual choice though, I suspect most would probably opt to reduce their stay in hospital.

    Replies: @Beckow, @AP

    , @Dmitry
    @AP


    Until he started the invasion
     
    You said ordinary Russians are responsible for the invasion of Ukraine and sin because they voted for Putin and even those who do not vote for Putin must be somehow responsible.

    But you have been in this forum promoting Putin to Russians. This is despite being American, without the information control and implications that are for Russians in relation to the government.

    From your logic, you are more responsible for the invasion of Ukraine, than any of us Russians who criticized your views. I mean the thread is only year ago. https://www.unz.com/akarlin/russias-nationalist-turn/#comment-4928594


    Cubans think so?

     

    If you are managed by propaganda, given years of fake data from all directions and have zero control about the outcome either way.


    Terrible things happen to communities because they have collectively engaged in sin.

    How are these similar?
     

    Aztecs and (more primitive) pagan peoples had believed that material goods like harvests are attained or not, if god is happy or sad about the people.

    This is the theology you are promoting, it is like Aztecs, but also many ancient peoples. Hinduism of course is much more sophisticated than this.

    Belief in the raingods has been common in Iron Age even in the Fertile Crescent. Part of this was still believed by the Ancient Israelites in the time of Solomon, although there is more sophisticated teaching by the Divided Kingdom, there the remainder's in Job's friends, some of the disciples Jesus has to correct.

    It is opposite of New Testament teaching, of course.


    can quote passages to support all kinds of claims

     

    Every time I discuss the Bible with you, it seems to me, you must never have read the book, neither subsequent religion's literature or history. You often promote reverse of most of the teachings of the New Testament. But at least I think there are probably people here like Coconuts and Bashibuzuk who read the bible so hopefully this discussion will not be too lost.

    the Church has different conclusions:

     

    What church?

    For example, embrace of poverty is central in Catholic teaching. You don't know the vow of poverty? You know anything of Carmelites, Hospitallers, Jesuits, Dominicans, Franciscans, Augustinians? You read any Catholic writers like Thomas a Kempis or Ignatius of Loyola?


    the Church has different conclusions:

     

    Not about poverty.

    By the way, Catholic Church has said recently that helping Syrian refugees is the most important social topic of our time. I've been in Catholic services and they ask you for the money to help refugees at the final.

    Russian Orthodox Church has said that "special military operation" (i.e. invasion of Ukraine) is a holy mission that can remove your sins if you join.


    A community that has fallen into sin is in greater need to “carry a cross”
     
    Not this as they constantly write, the Christians are the most persecuted and suffering community "in this world", although not in the world to come.

    need to suffer in order to expunge one’s sins

     

    In the New Testament, suffering in this world is not related to sins, as not just constantly Jesus says (but also the later writers).
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=John+9:1-4

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

  524. @Bashibuzuk
    @LatW


    As to the economic connectivity, before 2020 and within the security arrangement that lasted until 2022, the trade between the EU and Russia was increasing, Russia’s export structure was starting to change from just raw material to more of actual product and Ukraine, too, started trading more. Everyone was benefiting. Had the RusFed not made the ultimatum in December 2021, this would have continued to everyone’s benefit (despite the problems started in 2014).
     
    I think this is precisely why this whole thing happened. The Great Reset is about causing economic downturn during the fourth industrial revolution transition to preserve the limited natural ressources for those future generations of genetic lineages whom will get past the current population bottleneck, while NATO is of course about "keeping Germans down, keeping Russians out and keeping Americans in". Combine both and you get the picture.

    We have two global projects for the posthuman/transhuman future of mankind: the ones of the Chinese elites and the Globalized West elites. Only one of these projects will prevail.

    RusFed tried to ride on both trains and sit on both chairs at once. As usual with Pynya, it was more about indecision than about strategic ambivalence (RusFed has no strategy it is led by Noviops who only do tactical moves).

    So after 2012 and Pynya's coming back and clinging to power, the Globalized West has chosen to act in order to prevent both Ukraine and RusFed from either emerging as a unified economic space and/or joining OBOR. Remember that offers of "Reset" in US and RusFed relations have been made to Medvedev and seemingly moved forward until Pynya came back. Possibly, the 2008 financial and the 2012 economic crisis also did not help. A sense of urgency might have prevailed among the Atlanticist elite back then during the Maidan.


    These kinds of projects of massive global scale (same as the USSR), in order to work, need to be created in a way that every participant’s interests are protected and their needs are met. Not through domination because that doesn’t work on the micro level. When you invite large stakeholders such as China, you need to consider everyone’s interests. Not just interests of German businesses or Russian / Chinese oligarchs.
     
    These massive projects actually all end up in the way of the Babel Tower, they crumble while the multitudes that built them divide and dissolve. That is unless and until it remains held together by brute force and/or very strong metaphysics. Elites always think that their attempt is different and cannot be compared to the historical records, but since times immemorial it always ends the same. There will be no Heaven on Earth built by Elites' Decree.

    Poland wants peace in the region so it can continue to thrive. Poland et al want a space where their own can develop, where they themselves are given priority and not outsiders (who ever they may be).
     
    Poland and others in the region have an axe to grind with those who have dominated them in the past. It is the result of both a national trauma and a national superiority complex. When Poles are honest, they usually recognize as much. I had a couple of Polish friends with whom I got along rather well (we had a similar type of humor) and they candidly admitted that when it comes to Russians they have a hard time remaining rational. Interestingly enough, it is not the case at all in RusFed where people have a very balanced attitude towards Poland, and if educated enough usually appreciate Polish literature, movies and music. Im general, Russians usually do not see Poles or Balts as inferior or inherently hostile.

    The military equipment is sourced from several countries that are the main global producers. Germany, US, Israel, South Korea, Sweden, Finland, Turkey, those being the top producers of the best weapons and there is a limited number of producers who can deliver the required amount in a limited time frame for the best price. Germany put her military production on the back burner for many years and Germany is also reluctant to sell for political reasons (which is understandable). Afaik, the German tanks are also more expensive and not as readily available.
     
    Sure, but they get their subsidies' moneys from EU, mostly from Western European's taxpayers taxes or the inflation that all the EU citizens have to absorb when EU Central Banks print moneys out of thin air. They should promote and prefer EU industries and EU countries MIC. But they buy Korean or in the case of future nuclear stations American companies. It is not the way old EC used to work when they built Airbus or other great European industries. It is as if Eastern Euros are here for the subsidies, but not for the economic cooperation that might favor Old Europe. It is a selfish attitude.

    We don’t know how the chips will fall. One must learn from history and it is certainly tempting to draw these comparisons, but, as Heraclitus said, you cannot step in the same river twice, panta rei – everything flows, everything is in a flux, everything is a struggle.
     
    Agreed.

    Did you ask the Dubliners (will their job be to provide Guinness?) and the Siberians? As to Han Chinese characteristics, if that’s what the majority of Russians want… alas, it’s their land.
     
    Nobody wants this, but it might occur nevertheless. As I wrote earlier, we have to choose between two Globalist projects. The Chinese is one of those.

    Poland is now Germany’s 5th largest trading partner (Poland recently surpassed Italy that way), so their trade volumes are consistently high. Germany doesn’t object.
     
    The problem is not economic, but political. Germany doesn't have to be dictated by Poland or Eastern European EU members in general. Old Europe will not stand it. Eastern European EU members might end up learning it the hard way.

    Replies: @LatW, @Barbarossa, @Beckow

    These massive projects actually all end up in the way of the Babel Tower, they crumble while the multitudes that built them divide and dissolve.

    The multitudes are still here, still breathing. Maybe they don’t built much now and even simple maintenance has disappeared, but the momentum remains. Most people have nowhere to go as the modern globalist Tower of Babel crumbles. Everyone still clings to it, they join maddened Halloween crowds to experience it and go willingly to death for the sake of keeping the imported nonsense beliefs going, Like a youthful love that aged it is a combination of ritual, duty, and nagging fear that it is no longer meaningful. In the big picture it is bizarre that people die in Seoul for Halloween – a cargo cult sacrifice so disconnected from Korea that it indeed resembles a death cult.

    I usually think of the people afflicted with the modern liberal malady as dead-enders. They stopped considering what happens after the end and fully embraced the biological divine equation of life-and-death. Eventually they chose – maybe rationally or maybe out of hedonism – to live it up fully as individuals, human biology be damned. It is a natural progression. The current one, the last and most massive liberal wave in the human history, started with the Enlightenment.

    We reached a peak in the last few years: the uber-liberalism is everywhere, it even dominates its so called enemies. Putin is by all standards a liberal guy, so is the Pope, the children of Chinese nomenklatura, the crazy bush-fighters in Africa, and the Arab sheiks. They all bought into it, because it was good, it delivered. After the peak, some sort of a civil war was inevitable – watch any small group of animals as they get stranded, they start elbowing, shoving and eventually an all out fight erupts. When the road up is closed, we retrace the steps going back – the elites call it the reset.

    In Eastern Europe it will be very bad: it is the epicenter of the global civil war. Ukies stepped up as valiant warriors for the peak global uber-liberalism – nobody else seemed to have the cojones. Maybe the Poles will join in. There is a deep irony in who is now fighting to keep the globalism going slightly longer. But who would we expect to fight? It was the Goths against the Goths in most actual battles as Rome was easing into its oblivion. I find observing it quite enjoyable, painful but very real: lining up to die for a dead idea is very ancient. Like we are killing each others’ gods forgetting that we are the ones who created them.

    • Replies: @Bashibuzuk
    @Beckow

    I agree with what you wrote.

    A minor observation, I also think we have reached an inflection point, but IMO we have passed past this stage. It was perhaps a couple of years, decades or even generations ago. We did not see it because we do not see the forest for the trees, we are too engaged in our daily lives to notice and the propaganda is too pervasive, especially through advertising and certainly even more so since the social networking made its appearance some 20 years ago. The elites known full well that we are past the apex, that we are going downhill. They are actually in damage control, but some of them also seem tempted to go the full controlled demolition way. I think most genetic lineages/bloodlines in the general populace won't make it past the bottleneck. I hope that I am wrong though.


    Like we are killing each others’ gods forgetting that we are the ones who created them.
     
    Before erasing someone from history entirely, their gods must be killed. Yes, at the end of Western Roman Empire it was Goths and other barbarians fighting against each other for the control of the decaying Latin civilization. And even among the Attila's Huns that came plundering, it was Eastern Goths that probably formed an important proportion in the officers' ranks.

    The difference among the Latin and Attila's (or King Etzel's as the Germans called him) Goths, might have been that the ones who stayed among the barbarians kept their native mythology longer than the ones who joined the decadent and crumbling civilization. Later on, it was their barbarian social organization that allowed them to introduce feudal relations between the monarchs and their elite subjects. It was on these somewhat more archaic social norms that the medieval West was built during the Dark Ages. And their gods and heroes survived through their myths and sagas until the day they helped nourishing German Romanticism and the rebirth of the Germanic nation.

    If we find a way to carry our myths, heroes and gods through the coming population bottleneck, then a rebirth is possible in some future days. Otherwise we will be erased for good, with only the victorious elites capable of knowing that our world has one day existed.

    We need sound and enduring metaphysics and myths. Otherwise we will end up living and dying like animals do. And become forgotten as dead animals are.

    Replies: @Beckow

    , @A123
    @Beckow


    We reached a peak in the last few years: the uber-liberalism is everywhere,
    ...
    They all bought into it, because it was good, it delivered. After the peak, some sort of a civil war was inevitable – watch any small group of animals as they get stranded, they start elbowing, shoving and eventually an all out fight erupts. When the road up is closed, we retrace the steps going back – the elites call it the reset.

    In Eastern Europe it will be very bad: it is the epicenter of the global civil war

     

    EE has a good chance of coming out OK. Hungary and Czechia have cohesive culture. Poland, outside of Warsaw, is also pretty solid. And Warsaw youth, when faced with need for food, are highly likely to change mental outlook.

    The largest disasters will be in Western Europe. France, Germany, and Sweden no longer have anything left resembling a national identity to fall back on.
    ___

    The wild cards are America and China.

    CCP colonialism has locked in huge energy and food imports as a necessity. If one or two colonies have meltdowns, the mainland can send the PLA to restore order. If the "Reset" is both sudden and wide spread, the CCP could be left with a population they cannot feed.

    In the U.S., Christian Populism (a.k.a. MAGA) is building a common culture across racial lines. How long will it take to progress? With sufficient cohesion, containment of Blue Cities while they burn themselves may be a viable option.

    Utah will prosper even if the crisis is especially serious: (1)


    The First Presidency recommends that Church members “begin their home storage by storing the basic foods that would be required to keep them alive if they did not have anything else to eat.” After they have a year’s supply of the basics, they may then add other foods they are accustomed to eating regularly. (See First Presidency letter, Jan. 20, 2002.)
     
    The best case scenario is a Slow Reset rather than a Civil War. Gradual decoupling will result in both MAGA and Chinese workers coming out as big winners. It is not a zero sum game. National resiliency is a virtue and strength for each nation, even if it requires small coherent groups like the Visegrád 4.

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/ensign/2006/03/random-sampler/food-storage-for-one-year

  525. @Mr. Hack
    @Beckow


    They all look so freaking calm, maybe they know that there is no way to stop this, so why get too emotional?
     
    Unfortunately, for most Americans the war in Ukraine has become not much more than a certain segment within the national news in the evening, usually about half way through the program, very sympathetic towards Ukraine and critical of Russia. Judging by the responses of Europeans like yourself and German_Reader that live much closer to the theater of action, directly receiving more refugees from this war, the interest level is much higher.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk, @Beckow

    We are interested because it is right over the hills, it is interesting, and it puts us in the center again – I suppose a certain narcissistic impulse kicks in. The endless refugees going back and forward make it real on a personal level.

    Our best hope is that the others – like in America – lose interest and the overheated rhetoric calms down. If not, this has no natural stopping point. It will eventually devour everything – at least in this region, but probably could not be contained.

    Accepting that Russians exists, and have certain rights, and that armed Nato-controlled Ukraine is a bridge too far is very hard for true believers like you. You want it all. Well, it cannot be – you hit a wall, now you dream that it is crumbling, but what if it doesn’t? The odds are that walls like Russia don’t crumble. In my darker moments I think it is too late for a deal – it will be taken to its bloody ends and then regretted forever. And if we get to experience the regrets that will be a happy ending. It could be worse.

  526. @Bashibuzuk
    @LatW


    The truth is – for Balto-Slav, neither the Byzantine despotism nor the German Ordnung are the best. There has to be our own way, that is best for our own mentality and temperament. It is something in between of those two and something really special that we must seek.
     
    I agree.

    The peasant population of the Tsarist Empire suffered tremendously under the domination of the Westernized Imperial elites. The Empire-building process has been a tragedy for the Russian muzhiks. That is why the muzhik turned his weapons against the Imperial State as soon as he could in 1917. That is why he raided the palaces and country houses of the Tsarist elite, killing their owners every time he could. He saw them as tyrants and tyrants they were.



    Instead of the Westernized Empire, the muzhik wanted a community that would manage local life along the usual lines of the peasant communal organization: Mir, he thought that they could manage their affairs without external intervention: "мы тут сами, миром решим" (we would decide ourselves here, as a community - peacefully).

    Somewhere far, the muzhik wanted a wise and benevolent chief, a father figure, a priestly intellectual who would spend his days and nights thinking of the greater good, while abstaining from any self-serving considerations.

    And in between this high spirited leader and his community, the muzhik wanted strong and just men, true heroes, fearless warriors deciding what is just in councils of equals and applying the law mercilessly to everyone without exception.

    That is all of course a very primitive social organization pattern: a Priestly King / a Warrior Caste / a peasant clan living of the land. It was pre-industrial, perhaps even pre-historical. And of course it was used against the poor and naive peasants as soon as they disarmed after the end of the Civil War.

    Instead of the Higher Priestley King, they got Stalin. Instead of the heroic Warrior Caste they got the sadistic NKVD, and instead the local community they got the kolkhoz enslavement.

    Better be careful about what we dream of. Dreams might turn to nightmares.

    Ataman Krasnov, was among the rare White Guard leaders who thought that the muzhik really needed two things: a strong local autonomy up to the regional level and a strong Tsar that might balance the differences and harmonize the interests between the communities for a greater good. His ideal was basically the confederation of Cossack Stanitzas under the rule of a popular Tsar (мужицкий Царь). But most White Guard officers were not monarchists, they were more often than not center-left democrats. And the muzhik did not (and doesn't until this very day) understand democracy.

    So going back to what would be best for Balto-Slav as social organization: IMO it would be a confederation with a strong local self administration and a center that would basically have the duty and power to ensure defense against the internal enemies (organized crime mostly and corrupt bureaucracy), and the external foes (anyone who would attempt to harm the Balto-Slav populations).

    It would be in short a Balto-Slav Union of Republics with a strong common defense and law enforcement forces, but with maximum local religious, cultural and economic independence.

    But perhaps it is too idealistic and would end up again in tyranny and in ensuing turmoil.

    Replies: @AP, @LatW

    The Empire-building process has been a tragedy for the Russian muzhiks.

    That’s true, the Russian muzhik has often been treated unjustly and made disposable. It’s a lot to take.

    [MORE]

    the muzhik wanted a community that would manage local life along the usual lines of the peasant communal organization: Mir, he thought that they could manage their affairs without external intervention: “мы тут сами, миром решим”

    Superficially, this reminds me a little bit of the Nordic principle of lagom – it means, “just enough” or “everything in moderation”, and apparently it comes from when the vikings were passing the horn around and everyone could drink just a bit (or just enough, so there would be enough for them just as much as for the next guy). So that’s where the Nordic idea of moderation and egalitarianism comes from. But, ofc, the viking society had classes – a king, karl, jarl, slaves, so it was not at all egalitarian in that aspect. The Russian version may or may not be something similar. Yes, the Russians are quite communal, Balts are less so – the Balts traditionally preferred to live not in villages but separate homesteads that are spread out with several buildings and lots of pasture and woods.

    That is all of course a very primitive social organization pattern: a Priestly King / a Warrior Caste / a peasant clan living of the land

    In some ways, if you exclude urbanization, these sentiments were somewhat felt in the 1930s authoritarian ideologies. So it’s not something that would have been entirely out of reach even as recent as the 20th century (if it weren’t for the unfortunate things that took place). These were viable ideas. Primitive doesn’t always mean bad. Our societies today are complex, which is interesting, but sometimes one yearns for something simple.

    Better be careful about what we dream of. Dreams might turn to nightmares.

    Well put, lol.

    мужицкий Царь

    Well, that might be a kind of a myth or an ideal upon which a muzhik could even self-reflect. It’s a little bit of a late 19th century romantic idea. But, yes, I’m aware, that that’s what Russians long for sometimes, which makes one think that their skepticism of democracy is not just something that derives from the hardships of the 90s.

    But most White Guard officers were not monarchists, they were more often than not center-left democrats.

    See, everyone who has older relatives in the former Russian Empire knows this (you hear this from your grandparents about their grandparents), many were “democrats” at that time as those ideas had become broadly popular.

    And the muzhik did not (and doesn’t until this very day) understand democracy.

    Well, democracy requires compromises and a certain flexibility of the psyche, the muzhik has a very simple, direct, naive and straightforward psyche. I don’t mean this in a bad or condescending way.

    So going back to what would be best for Balto-Slav as social organization: IMO it would be a confederation with a strong local self administration and a center that would basically have the duty and power to ensure defense against the internal enemies (organized crime mostly and corrupt bureaucracy),

    Yes, but I’d be careful with any far reaching security institutions that guard against “internal” enemies. It smacks a little bit of FSB chasing nationalists. But, wait, our Balto-Slav confederation would already be nationalist in essence, hopefully.

    But perhaps it is too idealistic and would end up again in tyranny and in ensuing turmoil.

    Yes, it is very idealistic, but you laid it out very well.

  527. @AP
    @Dmitry


    Your views seem more like something Aztec or belief in rain gods
     
    Aztec demons demanded mass human sacrifice of innocents.

    Terrible things happen to communities because they have collectively engaged in sin.

    How are these similar?

    Medieval Christians explained the Mongol invasion as a divine punishment for sins.

    So, you would believe the area which experiences this property boom and asset increase are therefore becoming further from entering the Kingdom of Heaven, in the New Testament
     
    I do not belong to a Protestant sect that believes the Bible is more important than the Church. One can quote passages to support all kinds of claims but the Church has different conclusions:

    https://www.goarch.org/-/orthodox-christian-wealth-and-stewardship

    Putin and polls consistently show that Russians support the war.

    And the polls in Cuba, will show Cuba has the best healthcare system in the world
     
    Do Cubans think so? Because most Russians do like Putin and do support the war. This support has eroded only because Russians are experiencing mass mobilization. This means that most Russians didn’t mind invading Ukraine and slaughtering its people but they mind getting killed themselves.

    Putin.. are popular among Russians

    You were promoting him to us
     
    Until he started the invasion and mass killing of Ukrainians. Russians still like him though.

    “is being most devastated by”

    Being most devastated, suffering and persecuted is not indicator of unrighteousness, in the New Testament teaching

     

    It suggests a need to suffer in order to expunge one’s sins. A community that has fallen into sin is in greater need to “carry a cross” than one that has not. It is an opportunity for redemption.

    When the Holy Inquisition burned heretics it was for the purpose of their salvation.

    Religious Catholics who suffer chronic pain will often find meaning in their experience by viewing it as an opportunity to pay for their sins and thereby reduce their stay in purgatory. This does not necessarily mean that they were bad people personally. We are mortal and will die as a consequence of the original sin.

    Replies: @silviosilver, @Dmitry

    When the Holy Inquisition burned heretics it was for the purpose of their salvation.

    I have never heard of such a thing. Heretics were persecuted lest they infect the rest of the flock with their incorrect beliefs and thus imperil their immortal souls. I think the copey idea that heretics were burned for their own good is something you’ve invented. Prove me wrong.

    Religious Catholics who suffer chronic pain will often find meaning in their experience by viewing it as an opportunity to pay for their sins and thereby reduce their stay in purgatory.

    Yeah okay, but given an actual choice though, I suspect most would probably opt to reduce their stay in hospital.

    • Replies: @Beckow
    @silviosilver

    As so often, AP lives in his made-up world of how he would like things to be, from Catholic Church to the evils of 'socialism'; it was planted in his over-eager mind in very poor schools. And by culture based on self-therapy and control of hoi polloi.

    The concept of Purgatory was gradually invented only in the 13.-14. centuries, it is a marginal part of the catholic faith. Heretics and witches were brutally murdered to maintain order, to scare people, to keep the existing hierarchy in place. What they told them as they lit the fires was of no consequence. But AP believes, as he must - his self-image is centered on not being common, so he invents nonsense: fancy ancestors, well meaning Church, non-existing history, etc...a fish barely out of water.

    Replies: @silviosilver, @AP

    , @AP
    @silviosilver


    “When the Holy Inquisition burned heretics it was for the purpose of their salvation.”

    I have never heard of such a thing
     
    It’s commonly heard, the fire was supposed to have a purifying effect.

    Heretics were persecuted lest they infect the rest of the flock with their incorrect beliefs and thus imperil their immortal souls.
     
    That too of course.

    I think the copey idea that heretics were burned for their own good is something you’ve invented. Prove me wrong.
     
    I don’t have time for a real search, this is the first thing that came up on Google:

    https://trueblood.fandom.com/wiki/Spanish_Inquisition

    “Burning was believed to cleanse the soul”

    So I didn’t invent it.

    Replies: @silviosilver

  528. @AP
    @Bashibuzuk


    The Intermarium is put in place to prevent the economic connectivity between Old Europe (France, Italy, Germany…) and China through the territories currently controlled, or in the case of Belarus, influenced by the RusFed.
     
    Intermarium provides shelter from both Western would-be masters and Eastern despots. Khmelnytsky's treason doomed both Poland and Ukraine for centuries. This is finally becoming better understood and undone. The Russians and their tools see it - thus, their bringing up Bandera at every opportunity. It isn't working. Historically, Russia + Ukraine have done well in wars, but Russia alone could not handle Poland + Ukraine. When Poland and Ukraine were united they captured Moscow.* When Russia was without Ukraine it failed to defeat Poland (1921). Russia is unable to conquer Ukraine alone, the best it is doing is holding 15% (having grabbed 20% in the beginning) while bleeding out.

    Poland is playing its hand as usual, in a somewhat demonstrative manner. They could have ordered their main battle tanks and other military upgrades in Old Europe, but they didn’t.
     
    Because Germany is viewed as hesitant and unreliable. Not the best long-term strategic partner. Korea offered a much better deal: hundreds of tanks, plus joint production in Poland.

    *Had this victory been consolidated there would have been peace and unity among the Slavs and their Baltic cousins.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk, @AnonfromTN

    I am not a history buff, so I have a question about Polish capture of Moscow. Do you mean that campaign that ended with Poles besieged in the Kremlin eating their horses (some say each other) and then surrendering to Russian irregulars organized by Minin and Pozharsky?

    • Agree: Bashibuzuk
    • Replies: @AP
    @AnonfromTN


    I am not a history buff, so I have a question about Polish capture of Moscow. Do you mean that campaign that ended with Poles besieged in the Kremlin eating their horses (some say each other) and then surrendering to Russian irregulars organized by Minin and Pozharsky
     
    Poland did not retain Moscow but the war ended with a PLC victory and expansion of territory:

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/bc/Truce_of_Deulino_1618-1619.PNG

    The fact that the all of Muscovy was not absorbed into the PLC was of course a historical tragedy.
  529. @Bashibuzuk
    @LatW


    the resources that the RusFed wanted to take over belong to Ukraine
     
    I was referring to the overall trend in downsizing the natural ressources consumption under the circular economy promoted as part of the fourth industrial revolution. They believe in balancing human consumption with the overall ressources of the biosphere. At least as long as we don't have sufficient energy to and technological advances for an access to Solar System's ressources.

    OTOH, there's not that much ressources that RusFed would have wanted to take over in Ukraine. Black soils for agricultural purposes and human ressources come to mind along with what was left of Soviet technology in aerospace and some other high tech fields. And all that was accessible under the agreement for Eurasian Economic Union. Remember that RusFed offered EU to have tripartite discussions with Ukraine in 2013, an offer EU declined.


    they should avoid open wars, but try to take over via trade, mergers, acquisitions, etc.
     
    A simple manner to restrict ressources consumption is through outright depopulation. Remember the bison slaughter on the Great Plains to force the bison hunting tribes off the land and into the reservations. Today, warfare and ensuing technosphere, electric grid and overall damage to industry would play the same role. Force the "wrong people" out of the land as refugees and drop their already low birth rate. Then in a couple of generations (this is the time the fourth industrial revolution transition would take according to Chubais) you can take this land and give it to the "right people".

    Whereas with an outright invasion, the West saw it as more of a threat and, because Ukraine managed to fight back, the West granted support. Had this not happened it’d be business as usual and Russia could’ve continued its creeping annexations.
     
    Pynya got tricked just like Saddam in Koweit. For whatever reason (probably some backdoor deal with some global elite faction) he thought that the SMO would go as smoothly in Ukraine as it did in Kazakhstan. Why he believed it is a mystery, perhaps he has been promised an anti-Zelensky coup in Ukraine? And he was ready and willing to push back Donbass rebel regions into a federated Ukraine under the Minsk 2 agreement.

    What is truly amazing is his anti-NATO ultimatum. He couldn't have possibly thought that NATO would seriously discuss it. It was monumental chutzpah which is not the way he usually behaves. There is something mysterious about this topic, some information we will probably never know.

    You think it really will be “transhuman”? You think human beings want to live that way?
     
    The plebs will be forced to live in a human anthill like manner under a Big Data social score system in smart cities. The plebs will stop reproducing, but that would be a feature not a bug. The elite would enjoy a far greater lifespan, better health and enhanced cognitive capabilities. They will have an infinitely higher standard of living compared to the masses if plebs. Then after a few generations, the human population would reach a technological level that would allow humans to colonize Solar System, while the biosphere would be restored and the plebs would mostly perish in their smart city "mouse utopia" (as per Calhoun's Universe 25).

    Well, don’t you think both of those Globalist projects are dependent on each other?
     
    Yes they are, it is a false dichotomy just like Communism vs Capitalism in the previous Cold War. Two roads leading to the same cliff (to use Shafarevich's book title). But in the end the question would be who is in control: the Globalized Western elites or the CCP Nomenklatura? That is what the fighting will be all about, not some "human rights" BS.

    then those on your side, who are not willing to stay under China and want to be closer to us, will still be separated from us, which is really lame.
     
    Those "on my side" want nothing to do with any type of Globalist agenda, either Western or Chinese. They are both inhumane and will both most probably lead to catastrophic consequences in the end. Those "on my side " are to be found all around the world, China included. Most people want to stay human and have a somewhat meaningful normal human life. Transhumanists and Technofetishists are few and far between. Nevertheless, the silent majority will most probably end up forced to live under the Globalist managed system. And it will mean its genetic lineages elimination from the global gene pool after a few generations.

    It started with the Munich speech in 2007.
     
    According to Klaus Schwab, Pynya was a WEF Young Global Leader since his early years in politics. They probably assigned him the role of the "Russian Ubervilain" to be feared by the Western middle class. A middle class sheeple distracted by Pynya's antics, while being carefully and patiently downsized and corralled fowards extinction.

    The issue is that neither one of those is wanted anymore these days. So one must either live with what is currently available, or create some alternative metaphysics. Or re-invigorate something old.
     
    This is true. We need re-invigorated metaphysics. I think we will not manage to preserve human civilization without it. All the Transhumanist claims to the opposite non withstanding. They believe in deus ex machina but their "gods" are "technological demons". We need to bring back human archetypes of the higher kind from the collective subconscious to oppose the Technosphere and its pseudo-sentient entities.

    Mostly they just want to be left alone (but also for Ukraine to be left alone). Everyone just wants to be treated as an equal but that’s not what you guys want. You both want to be above. But you can’t do that in our space. We’re not asking for much.
     
    Unfortunately, you will not be left alone, nobody will. Anyway, your elites clearly enjoy the "клоуны у п☆дорасов" status (to use Pelevin's aphorism). So they will be used and abused by the Globalist and you will suffer as much or even more than anybody else.

    Yes, because RusFed was not a victim of Poland so they don’t care and can be more relaxed.
     
    Russians have been on the receiving end of German warfare during both World Wars, but they have no ill will towards Germany. They mostly have no ill will towards US and UK despite the Anglosphere being their main opponent for generations. Russians are naturally a quite forgiving people despite all the propaganda of the Armenian-Jewish RusFed media.

    You seem to care a lot about Old Europe all of a sudden.
     
    I don't like unjust situations. Old Europe has worked its arses off to build EC into EU and now they kind of are pushed around by the EEs who have decided to be loyal Atlanticist henchmen for reasons of historical revanchism and economic opportunism. But this applies to the elites, the normal folks, who mostly are my genetic relatives, are probably not even aware of the roles their nations have been assigned to. Normal folks just want a quiet life.

    Nobody should be dictated to. That’s one thing we should all learn. We should try to approach each other calmly and respectfully but it’s hard during such a horrific war.
     
    We will all be dictated about how we must behave by the Globalist technocrats. They are today's Nomenklatura. They think they know better how we should live our lives. That's the expected behavior of a bunch of highly achieving sociopaths.

    Replies: @LatW, @S

    They believe in balancing human consumption with the overall resources of the biosphere.

    Surely, it seems like eventually there will be shortages and there is degradation of natural resources, but the world population will soon be shrinking on its own. There will be pressure though for sure.

    [MORE]

    Today, warfare and ensuing technosphere, electric grid and overall damage to industry would play the same role. Force the “wrong people” out of the land as refugees and drop their already low birth rate.

    I understand. There will be a major depopulated area in the place of East Ukraine, where there used to be thriving cities. There is hope though that eventually some refugees could return. It’s also possible that the Ukrainians who go to Canada will have a baby boom (if the husbands join). Some EEs have a small baby boom when they move to the West. Ofc, that sucks for Ukraine anyway (since those will be cute little English speaking babies).

    Then in a couple of generations (this is the time the fourth industrial revolution transition would take according to Chubais) you can take this land and give it to the “right people”.

    Who would be the “right people”? Btw, have you heard this meme that used to go around the Russian patriot community about how Chubais or some other 90s “liberal” believes that Russia only needs something like 40M people to “service the pipe”?

    Pynya got tricked just like Saddam in Koweit. For whatever reason (probably some backdoor deal with some global elite faction) he thought that the SMO would go as smoothly in Ukraine as it did in Kazakhstan. Why he believed it is a mystery,

    To believe it would be like Kazakhstan is utterly delusional. Shockingly delusional and it would be a Russian elite that I simply would not recognize anymore. Why are these f**ers so different from every Russian government before?? If they thought that it means they truly live in their detached hybrid reality bubble. The media, too, is removed from reality and for all to see.

    perhaps he has been promised an anti-Zelensky coup in Ukraine?

    It’s not as easy to organize as it might seem. Besides, removing him may not even change things that much as Ukrainians had already made up their minds.

    What is truly amazing is his anti-NATO ultimatum. He couldn’t have possibly thought that NATO would seriously discuss it. It was monumental chutzpah which is not the way he usually behaves. There is something mysterious about this topic, some information we will probably never know.

    I agree, this is very mysterious, and I often ponder what it was all about. It was really far out and not in line with the usual Kremlin approaches. The only thing that came to my mind is that Russia obviously regretted letting go of certain arrangements too easily and that Russia wanted to revisit or backtrack things. Which is understandable, given the chaos of the late 80s and early 90s. But it’s still far fetched to expect it in that format. Maybe it’s just because Pynya is old and he wants to leave a legacy, something like the crashing of “the US led world order” or a re-assembling of the Warsaw Pact, but it’s still too far out. Or – he was going to issue this utlimatum, invade Ukraine and then invade further. If the terms of the ultimatum are not met. He may have thought the Ukrainian troops would come to the Russian side.

    But in the end the question would be who is in control: the Globalized Western elites or the CCP Nomenklatura?

    Neither of them is too appealing, tbh. Not the people, but some of the elites.

    We need to bring back human archetypes of the higher kind

    I agree, these archetypes are still floating around.

    despite Armenian-Jewish RusFed media

    They gotta do something about that, though… hopefully, soon there will be a chance and it will happen.

    Old Europe has worked its arses off to build EC into EU

    Well, as I said, Western Europe benefitted from the enlargement. It may not be admitted on the kind of forum such as this one, but in more mainstream society this is an accepted belief. Again, one can question it, but, had the opposite been the case, the enlargement would not have happened. The West held way too many cards. And, btw, RusFed supported it, too.

    and now they kind of are pushed around by the EEs who have decided to be loyal Atlanticist henchmen for reasons of historical revanchism and economic opportunism.

    Well, the EEs loyalty to the US/UK may have remained a nuisance if it wasn’t for such a large war. Everyone was taken aback by it as no one really expected it. They thought they’d be able to live with a security vacuum forever and just trade and built mutual projects.

  530. @silviosilver
    @AP


    When the Holy Inquisition burned heretics it was for the purpose of their salvation.
     
    I have never heard of such a thing. Heretics were persecuted lest they infect the rest of the flock with their incorrect beliefs and thus imperil their immortal souls. I think the copey idea that heretics were burned for their own good is something you've invented. Prove me wrong.

    Religious Catholics who suffer chronic pain will often find meaning in their experience by viewing it as an opportunity to pay for their sins and thereby reduce their stay in purgatory.
     
    Yeah okay, but given an actual choice though, I suspect most would probably opt to reduce their stay in hospital.

    Replies: @Beckow, @AP

    As so often, AP lives in his made-up world of how he would like things to be, from Catholic Church to the evils of ‘socialism’; it was planted in his over-eager mind in very poor schools. And by culture based on self-therapy and control of hoi polloi.

    The concept of Purgatory was gradually invented only in the 13.-14. centuries, it is a marginal part of the catholic faith. Heretics and witches were brutally murdered to maintain order, to scare people, to keep the existing hierarchy in place. What they told them as they lit the fires was of no consequence. But AP believes, as he must – his self-image is centered on not being common, so he invents nonsense: fancy ancestors, well meaning Church, non-existing history, etc…a fish barely out of water.

    • Replies: @silviosilver
    @Beckow


    What they told them as they lit the fires was of no consequence.
     
    It's of no consequence to the casual unbeliever today, just looking to go about his life, but it is of some consequence for a truer historical understanding (an understanding which bleeds into our present political calculus in some instances). I think it matters that the Inquisition wasn't motivated solely by a desire to maintain control and order, rather because they were, in addition, fanatically convinced that heresies would lead the flock astray, damning their souls to hell and causing all sorts of civil mayhem in the process. (Eg the whole Arian episode, which the church seems to have retained some institutional memory of.) Plenty of ugly behavior involved in stamping heresies out, of course, which partisan Catholics are forever trying to sugarcoat.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk, @Coconuts

    , @AP
    @Beckow

    You lie about me as you lie about everything else.

    And there is an element of projection in your lies; you are the semi-educated product of socialist schools, repeating the anti-Christian and anti-Catholic myths that were stuffed into your simple mind by your masters. He schools in the USA followed the British-Protestant tradition and probably had similar myths about the Holy Inquisition.


    The concept of Purgatory was gradually invented only in the 13.-14. centuries, it is a marginal part of the catholic faith
     
    We Eastern Catholics and the Orthodox don’t talk about Purgatory.

    But numerous devout Roman Catholics find meaning in their physical suffering by the idea that suffering in this world will reduce their time in purgatory. I heard this several times when I had worked in a setting with terminally patients, it was not a marginal idea.

    Replies: @Beckow, @Barbarossa

  531. @German_reader
    @songbird


    IMO, this is why the theory that they’ll stop taking censuses in the UK soon is very believable.
     
    Isn't that what happened in Lebanon? iirc the last census there was in the 1940s, everybody knows that there have been massive demographic shifts since then, but the issue is just too politically explosive. Though I guess the political incentives in Britain might be rather different.
    There was another horror crime committed by one of Merkel's million recently btw, which I might just as well mention, if only as a change from the relentless talk about Ukraine. A Somali who came in 2015 attacked two 20- and 35-year old painters on a street in Ludwigshafen-Oggersheim and more or less butchered them with a large kitchen knife. He cut off the lower arm of one of them and threw it on the balcony of his ex-girlfriend. Then he walked to a nearby drug store and stabbed a customer (who survived) there before being shot (non-lethally) by police.
    Motive is still unclear, probably uncontrolled rage, so far it seems the victims were selected randomly. Maybe he wanted to scare his ex-girlfriend and thought he might just as well kill some pedestrians, dismember them and use their body parts as a power move. Incidentally, Oggersheim is where Helmut Kohl was from, I guess one could discern some deeper symbolism here.
    Anyway, I remember a comment by reiner tor from a few years ago where he basically wrote that he envied people living in 1957, because nowadays it seems like we're either heading towards a spectacularly stupid world war, or to a spectacularly stupid end through immigration apocalypse. Events since then certainly haven't disproven that assessment.

    Replies: @Sean

    The first census in Saudi Arabia showed it had too few people for the the Kings’s liking, so he ordered the population figure to be doubled before it was released. The deception has been continued. There are several million more people in Britain than its governments know or want to know.

    Britain’s financial situation is actual comparatively good, the UK has a much smaller deficit and total debt that any comparable country apart from Germany. It suits Sunak to give the impression that Britain is in ongoing terrible trouble, so he goets the credit but the Truss freefall of the pound and claims that pensions would soon be worthless/ mortgages would double at the same time as heating bills would triple, but it was an artificial crisis manufactured by the Bank Of England publicly announcing hey would stop supporting the pound and even specifying the date; they did it to get rid of her black ex she put in charge of the economy, and her too.

    Once there was a new Chancellor and then PM they delayed the Budget so they would not be working with the worst case assumptions, and the markets did not utter a word of criticism; this silence showed it was a pseudo crisis.

    Long term lowering growth is a problem for the UK but a means of boosting it is always available to Britain by importing more people, which also pumps up the housing market. Those two things are all economists and the government respectively want to do– timed so the boost comes before an election. The price of wholesale energy has fallen by a third since August so the price cap will likely not be activated. Sunak is going to to made to seem like a genius in a few months.

    It is alarming that Sunak understood that Truss’s ideas simply would not fly in Britain, and many non immigrant Conservatives did not understand that. So the immigrant psychos are worse, but the immigrant elite are–sad to say–maybe better.

  532. @Beckow
    @silviosilver

    As so often, AP lives in his made-up world of how he would like things to be, from Catholic Church to the evils of 'socialism'; it was planted in his over-eager mind in very poor schools. And by culture based on self-therapy and control of hoi polloi.

    The concept of Purgatory was gradually invented only in the 13.-14. centuries, it is a marginal part of the catholic faith. Heretics and witches were brutally murdered to maintain order, to scare people, to keep the existing hierarchy in place. What they told them as they lit the fires was of no consequence. But AP believes, as he must - his self-image is centered on not being common, so he invents nonsense: fancy ancestors, well meaning Church, non-existing history, etc...a fish barely out of water.

    Replies: @silviosilver, @AP

    What they told them as they lit the fires was of no consequence.

    It’s of no consequence to the casual unbeliever today, just looking to go about his life, but it is of some consequence for a truer historical understanding (an understanding which bleeds into our present political calculus in some instances). I think it matters that the Inquisition wasn’t motivated solely by a desire to maintain control and order, rather because they were, in addition, fanatically convinced that heresies would lead the flock astray, damning their souls to hell and causing all sorts of civil mayhem in the process. (Eg the whole Arian episode, which the church seems to have retained some institutional memory of.) Plenty of ugly behavior involved in stamping heresies out, of course, which partisan Catholics are forever trying to sugarcoat.

    • Agree: Bashibuzuk
    • Replies: @Bashibuzuk
    @silviosilver

    The fighting against heresies was an ongoing process for the Church and the heresies finally prevailed. Our world today has been as much or even more built by heretics (the Philosophes and the Rationalists, the Masonic lodges, Socialists, Materialists and the like) than by good Church-going people.

    Progress is in its essence an heretical innovation, it is in its very core truly Promethean, even bordering on Luciferian. In Islam they've stamped it out in the eleventh century and they lagged behind ever since. But Progress means eventually going through crises, some existential ones included. The Taliban in their Shariah - based society would have reached an enduring equilibrium if not for the external perturbations. They might still have a chance though if the Technosphere crumbles.

    Inquisition in both Christendom and Dar ul Islam had both a spiritual and a social regulatory role. It prevented Progress and innovation and enforced stasis. In Christendom it was more easily eroded through feudal mores. The feudal elites resented the Church having such an important impact on their lives and ended up supporting heretics (Protestants and Bogumils and Cathares before them). Eventually, the elite ended up owning the Church completely (in England) or severely limiting its prerogatives (everywhere else). In Islam it worked otherwise because there was no feudalism in the Western sense. It ended with the known results: Western colonial domination of most Islamic lands in the second half of the nineteenth and early half of the twentieth century.

    But despite a century of outright Western domination and another century of strong economic and cultural influences, Islamic populations still breed (unlike the extreme Orientals that have swallowed the Western idea of Progress line and sinker), so Islamic Ummah might well survive past our acute Progress phase. Then they will have their time under the sun again. Therefore their Inquisition did its job well it preserved their fundamental ethos, better than the Christian one did in the Christendom. Perhaps in Christendom, the Inquisition should have tried harder. Most probably though, the Pagan European should have had an Inquisition of their own and prevented the Abrahamic religious movements from ever becoming mainstream. We would have avoided much problems that way.

    , @Coconuts
    @silviosilver


    I think it matters that the Inquisition wasn’t motivated solely by a desire to maintain control and order, rather because they were, in addition, fanatically convinced that heresies would lead the flock astray, damning their souls to hell and causing all sorts of civil mayhem in the process.
     
    I think they used to have the idea that the Kingdom of God in heaven was the perfect society, the Church on earth was an imperfect manifestation of that, then the temporal kingdom outside of the Church was the next rung down in terms of perfection. Even though it was flawed and deformed by sin, it was still a creation and reflection of God and had its role to play in the chain of being.

    That would be one way in which religious division and sects, once they moved out of theological discussions among clerics and started forming groups of partisans, could become a political issue.

    The idea that the fires of purgatory were necessary to refine and cleanse souls of sin was definitely important in Latin Christianity in medieval times, there were detailed arguments about the cleansing power of these fires with the Orthodox, who rejected the idea that burning of this sort was involved in Theosis. A lot of time and effort went into prayers and masses for the souls of the dead and carrying out holy works to reduce their sufferings in the purgatorial fires. I don't know if the Inquisition specifically thought that burning unrepentant heretics would help purify them and increase their chances of access to heaven, but it doesn't seem impossible.

    There was also the idea that holding heretical beliefs made you a physical mutant, in Spain this became linked to the controversial 'purity of blood' idea, where holding heretical beliefs, or engaging in Jewish and Muslim practices contaminated an individual's blood. In France during the Wars of Religion I know they sometimes dissected Protestant bodies to try to find signs of heretical mutations.

    In the early 20th C. Portuguese nationalists like Antonio Sardinha were definitely defending the idea that the Inquisition had been important to defend national unity and the spirit of the race. Joseph de Maistre is pretty famous for being another outspoken champion of the Inquisition in political terms.

  533. Bashibuzuk says:
    @Beckow
    @Bashibuzuk


    These massive projects actually all end up in the way of the Babel Tower, they crumble while the multitudes that built them divide and dissolve.
     
    The multitudes are still here, still breathing. Maybe they don't built much now and even simple maintenance has disappeared, but the momentum remains. Most people have nowhere to go as the modern globalist Tower of Babel crumbles. Everyone still clings to it, they join maddened Halloween crowds to experience it and go willingly to death for the sake of keeping the imported nonsense beliefs going, Like a youthful love that aged it is a combination of ritual, duty, and nagging fear that it is no longer meaningful. In the big picture it is bizarre that people die in Seoul for Halloween - a cargo cult sacrifice so disconnected from Korea that it indeed resembles a death cult.

    I usually think of the people afflicted with the modern liberal malady as dead-enders. They stopped considering what happens after the end and fully embraced the biological divine equation of life-and-death. Eventually they chose - maybe rationally or maybe out of hedonism - to live it up fully as individuals, human biology be damned. It is a natural progression. The current one, the last and most massive liberal wave in the human history, started with the Enlightenment.

    We reached a peak in the last few years: the uber-liberalism is everywhere, it even dominates its so called enemies. Putin is by all standards a liberal guy, so is the Pope, the children of Chinese nomenklatura, the crazy bush-fighters in Africa, and the Arab sheiks. They all bought into it, because it was good, it delivered. After the peak, some sort of a civil war was inevitable - watch any small group of animals as they get stranded, they start elbowing, shoving and eventually an all out fight erupts. When the road up is closed, we retrace the steps going back - the elites call it the reset.

    In Eastern Europe it will be very bad: it is the epicenter of the global civil war. Ukies stepped up as valiant warriors for the peak global uber-liberalism - nobody else seemed to have the cojones. Maybe the Poles will join in. There is a deep irony in who is now fighting to keep the globalism going slightly longer. But who would we expect to fight? It was the Goths against the Goths in most actual battles as Rome was easing into its oblivion. I find observing it quite enjoyable, painful but very real: lining up to die for a dead idea is very ancient. Like we are killing each others' gods forgetting that we are the ones who created them.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk, @A123

    I agree with what you wrote.

    A minor observation, I also think we have reached an inflection point, but IMO we have passed past this stage. It was perhaps a couple of years, decades or even generations ago. We did not see it because we do not see the forest for the trees, we are too engaged in our daily lives to notice and the propaganda is too pervasive, especially through advertising and certainly even more so since the social networking made its appearance some 20 years ago. The elites known full well that we are past the apex, that we are going downhill. They are actually in damage control, but some of them also seem tempted to go the full controlled demolition way. I think most genetic lineages/bloodlines in the general populace won’t make it past the bottleneck. I hope that I am wrong though.

    Like we are killing each others’ gods forgetting that we are the ones who created them.

    Before erasing someone from history entirely, their gods must be killed. Yes, at the end of Western Roman Empire it was Goths and other barbarians fighting against each other for the control of the decaying Latin civilization. And even among the Attila’s Huns that came plundering, it was Eastern Goths that probably formed an important proportion in the officers’ ranks.

    The difference among the Latin and Attila’s (or King Etzel’s as the Germans called him) Goths, might have been that the ones who stayed among the barbarians kept their native mythology longer than the ones who joined the decadent and crumbling civilization. Later on, it was their barbarian social organization that allowed them to introduce feudal relations between the monarchs and their elite subjects. It was on these somewhat more archaic social norms that the medieval West was built during the Dark Ages. And their gods and heroes survived through their myths and sagas until the day they helped nourishing German Romanticism and the rebirth of the Germanic nation.

    If we find a way to carry our myths, heroes and gods through the coming population bottleneck, then a rebirth is possible in some future days. Otherwise we will be erased for good, with only the victorious elites capable of knowing that our world has one day existed.

    We need sound and enduring metaphysics and myths. Otherwise we will end up living and dying like animals do. And become forgotten as dead animals are.

    • Replies: @Beckow
    @Bashibuzuk


    ....find a way to carry our myths, heroes and gods through the coming population bottleneck, then a rebirth is possible in some future days
     
    There are a lot of people living today, so there is hope. The coming bottleneck - I agree - will purge a lot from the society - too many have decided to die out and there is nothing that can be done about it. My main hope is that the past (myths, gods...) will be preserved in the mixed society, that enough of our mixture will survive in the coming melange.

    But this is self-inflicted: the combination of biological stupidity and outright laziness is deadly. Dead-enders march...and they are so f...ing happy as they rush towards oblivion. But what can be done? It happened before: Rome went from 1 million plus to a small 10k city, many others did too. Something in the human psyche kicks in and biology stops. The continuing biology of any group is a prerequisite for the other stuff about that group to survive.

  534. While his analysis is excellent as it has been from the very begining, I don’t follow General (Ret.) Ben Hodges on why Ukraine winning and Putin being overthrown within a few months into next year is not going to come as such a surprise to Putin that he will be unable to get Russia’s tactical nukes into a state of readiness with the initial rationale of sending a signal to Ukraine/ US to stop the Ukrainian army advancing. From such a signal there would be a clear path to battlefield use.

    It seems Hodges has an unspoken assumption that any such signal would not be an honest one because Putin would not be able to get an order to detonate a nuke on the Ukrainian army executed by his subordinates, Right now that may, or may not, be true; yet if the Russians are driven back over the next several months and tens more thousands of Russian soldiers are killed plus a few more generals, there will be a desire in the surviving and humiliated Russian armed forces for vengeance, and a belief that Russia would not merely change leadership as a result of an outright loss, but break up would not be entirely ridiculous.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @Sean

    If the Russians lose a conventional war they will be broken up into statelets.

    , @Mikhail
    @Sean


    While his analysis is excellent as it has been from the very begining, I don’t follow General (Ret.) Ben Hodges on why Ukraine winning and Putin being overthrown within a few months into next year is not going to come as such a surprise to Putin that he will be unable to get Russia’s tactical nukes into a state of readiness with the initial rationale of sending a signal to Ukraine/ US to stop the Ukrainian army advancing.
     
    More like he's a fanatical crackpot, especially when compared to Jacques Baud, Danny Davis and yes Douglas Macgregor.

    Replies: @Sean

  535. Bashibuzuk says:
    @silviosilver
    @Beckow


    What they told them as they lit the fires was of no consequence.
     
    It's of no consequence to the casual unbeliever today, just looking to go about his life, but it is of some consequence for a truer historical understanding (an understanding which bleeds into our present political calculus in some instances). I think it matters that the Inquisition wasn't motivated solely by a desire to maintain control and order, rather because they were, in addition, fanatically convinced that heresies would lead the flock astray, damning their souls to hell and causing all sorts of civil mayhem in the process. (Eg the whole Arian episode, which the church seems to have retained some institutional memory of.) Plenty of ugly behavior involved in stamping heresies out, of course, which partisan Catholics are forever trying to sugarcoat.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk, @Coconuts

    The fighting against heresies was an ongoing process for the Church and the heresies finally prevailed. Our world today has been as much or even more built by heretics (the Philosophes and the Rationalists, the Masonic lodges, Socialists, Materialists and the like) than by good Church-going people.

    [MORE]

    Progress is in its essence an heretical innovation, it is in its very core truly Promethean, even bordering on Luciferian. In Islam they’ve stamped it out in the eleventh century and they lagged behind ever since. But Progress means eventually going through crises, some existential ones included. The Taliban in their Shariah – based society would have reached an enduring equilibrium if not for the external perturbations. They might still have a chance though if the Technosphere crumbles.

    Inquisition in both Christendom and Dar ul Islam had both a spiritual and a social regulatory role. It prevented Progress and innovation and enforced stasis. In Christendom it was more easily eroded through feudal mores. The feudal elites resented the Church having such an important impact on their lives and ended up supporting heretics (Protestants and Bogumils and Cathares before them). Eventually, the elite ended up owning the Church completely (in England) or severely limiting its prerogatives (everywhere else). In Islam it worked otherwise because there was no feudalism in the Western sense. It ended with the known results: Western colonial domination of most Islamic lands in the second half of the nineteenth and early half of the twentieth century.

    But despite a century of outright Western domination and another century of strong economic and cultural influences, Islamic populations still breed (unlike the extreme Orientals that have swallowed the Western idea of Progress line and sinker), so Islamic Ummah might well survive past our acute Progress phase. Then they will have their time under the sun again. Therefore their Inquisition did its job well it preserved their fundamental ethos, better than the Christian one did in the Christendom. Perhaps in Christendom, the Inquisition should have tried harder. Most probably though, the Pagan European should have had an Inquisition of their own and prevented the Abrahamic religious movements from ever becoming mainstream. We would have avoided much problems that way.

  536. @Dmitry
    @Bashibuzuk


    more about its beautiful cathedrals and the fine arts of
     
    Yes this is part of the view, although it is quite mainstream for Americans (unlike raingod view of karma).

    It is stereotypical 20th century disneyland view of Europe, where many immigrants in America want to connect to their ego an idealized world of princesses and castles. I'm not sure it was common in the 19th century, but definitely it is available in 20th century American culture, perhaps emerging partly like compensation while their country was being converted to a bit of disenchanted highway.

    Because immigrants in America could boast their ego in the 20th century with an idealized Disneyland view of Europe of princesses and castles, then it will be inevitable parts of African American culture responded by imagining they were descended from Kings of Egypt and build the pyramids.

    Because we all have the same temptation from ego to pretend they are a special snowflake and 20th century American culture has perhaps lacked the message that it is better to resist your ego, perhaps as teaching too much humility and anti-idealization, was not very aligned with retail and advertising.

    Pride is the most anti-Christian thing, as the original and greatest sin is pride. And pride for your own attainments might be weak enough, but pride for things which are not related to your life (like pride that someone has constructed a large cathedral in Europe a thousand years before you were born) would be especially against the teaching in the New Testament, if you know them.
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Philippians+2%3A1-8&version=AMPC

    Downtown Eastside Vancouver have the God’s Light in them
     
    And unlike the people in the skyscrapers of Vancouver, they would be lacking at least the difficulty of being a camel trying to go through the eye of the needle, from the view of the bible.

    , all of them Human, all of them Guilty and all of them Innocent.

     

    We're now becoming some kind of evangelists walking reading quotes from the bible, but yes the teaching of the bible.
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1+Corinthians+1:27-29
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=James+2%3A2-6

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk, @Wokechoke

    1000 year old cathedrals?

    Yes the French ethnics should have no pride in Notre Dame. They didn’t build it.

    Could you be more of a spiritual Jew than you proved yourself?

  537. @Sean
    While his analysis is excellent as it has been from the very begining, I don't follow General (Ret.) Ben Hodges on why Ukraine winning and Putin being overthrown within a few months into next year is not going to come as such a surprise to Putin that he will be unable to get Russia's tactical nukes into a state of readiness with the initial rationale of sending a signal to Ukraine/ US to stop the Ukrainian army advancing. From such a signal there would be a clear path to battlefield use.

    It seems Hodges has an unspoken assumption that any such signal would not be an honest one because Putin would not be able to get an order to detonate a nuke on the Ukrainian army executed by his subordinates, Right now that may, or may not, be true; yet if the Russians are driven back over the next several months and tens more thousands of Russian soldiers are killed plus a few more generals, there will be a desire in the surviving and humiliated Russian armed forces for vengeance, and a belief that Russia would not merely change leadership as a result of an outright loss, but break up would not be entirely ridiculous.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Mikhail

    If the Russians lose a conventional war they will be broken up into statelets.

  538. @AnonfromTN
    @AP

    I am not a history buff, so I have a question about Polish capture of Moscow. Do you mean that campaign that ended with Poles besieged in the Kremlin eating their horses (some say each other) and then surrendering to Russian irregulars organized by Minin and Pozharsky?

    Replies: @AP

    I am not a history buff, so I have a question about Polish capture of Moscow. Do you mean that campaign that ended with Poles besieged in the Kremlin eating their horses (some say each other) and then surrendering to Russian irregulars organized by Minin and Pozharsky

    Poland did not retain Moscow but the war ended with a PLC victory and expansion of territory:

    The fact that the all of Muscovy was not absorbed into the PLC was of course a historical tragedy.

    • LOL: Mikhail
  539. @silviosilver
    @AP


    When the Holy Inquisition burned heretics it was for the purpose of their salvation.
     
    I have never heard of such a thing. Heretics were persecuted lest they infect the rest of the flock with their incorrect beliefs and thus imperil their immortal souls. I think the copey idea that heretics were burned for their own good is something you've invented. Prove me wrong.

    Religious Catholics who suffer chronic pain will often find meaning in their experience by viewing it as an opportunity to pay for their sins and thereby reduce their stay in purgatory.
     
    Yeah okay, but given an actual choice though, I suspect most would probably opt to reduce their stay in hospital.

    Replies: @Beckow, @AP

    “When the Holy Inquisition burned heretics it was for the purpose of their salvation.”

    I have never heard of such a thing

    It’s commonly heard, the fire was supposed to have a purifying effect.

    Heretics were persecuted lest they infect the rest of the flock with their incorrect beliefs and thus imperil their immortal souls.

    That too of course.

    I think the copey idea that heretics were burned for their own good is something you’ve invented. Prove me wrong.

    I don’t have time for a real search, this is the first thing that came up on Google:

    https://trueblood.fandom.com/wiki/Spanish_Inquisition

    “Burning was believed to cleanse the soul”

    So I didn’t invent it.

    • Replies: @silviosilver
    @AP


    It’s commonly heard, the fire was supposed to have a purifying effect.
     
    We're not talking about some mere "purifying effect." You are claiming that people who died in a state of mortal sin were saved by burning them. You are claiming the Inquisition believed this, ie it is Catholic doctrine that unrepentant heretics are saved by burning them.

    I remind you, your own words were: “When the Holy Inquisition burned heretics it was for the purpose of their salvation.” Do you really want to stand by this?

    https://trueblood.fandom.com/wiki/Spanish_Inquisition
     
    A dorky fan site of a dorky TV show, lol.

    Take a break bro, you're usually a lot better than this.

    Replies: @AP

  540. @Sher Singh
    https://twitter.com/SarahLGates1/status/1586195999554347008

    Replies: @A123

    Notes on the tropes

    First Hindu PM
    Hindu Supremacists
    Desi Bro
    Upper caste
    Beef and alcohol
    Ganesha murti [used to secure £££]
    Faux anti-colonials of India [because successful]

    Implication: real Hindu decolonisers are poor and must wear Gandhi loincloth in 10 Downing St.

    Leftoids use race, religion, and other forms of polarized division to drive their emotionalist dogma. Anything that does not fit the stereotype must be crushed and ridiculed to protect Globalist theology.

    If Sunak was chosen by the Labour party, you would have none of this. However, a racial minority on the other side breaks the narrative. Thus, he must be “depicted” as white. Sunak said this on the record: (1)

    Rishi Sunak tells Macron that Channel must be ‘completely unviable’ for people traffickers as he pushes for new small boats deal with France

    The leaders committed to deepening our partnership to deter deadly journeys across the Channel that benefit organised criminals.

    ‘The Prime Minister and President Macron looked forward to meeting soon and to holding a UK-France summit next year.’

    Mr Sunak also wants to set tough new targets for the Home Office on asylum processing times, so that eight out of ten are completed within six months, The Times reported.

    SJW’s categorize this migration stance as White Nationalist. Therefore, Sunak = White Racist. Braverman = Even More White Nationalist.

    This should be no surprise to anyone. In America SJW’s regularly state, Justice Clearance Thomas = White.

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11365131/Sunak-tells-Macron-Channel-crossings-completely-unviable.html

    • Replies: @Sean
    @A123

    Truss was deliberately (in line with a policy proposed along with her Ugandan Chancellor published in 2012), cutting back on government revenue to force a shrinking of the state including its immigration controls, the standing down of which was her main practical proposal for economic growth. She kept the Christian turned Buddhist Braverman at the Home Office but cut her out of decisions, so Braverman resigned.

    If Sunak was chosen by the Labour party, you would have none of this.
     

    Its not so long ago that the Labour Party Leadership contest came down to the two sons of a Marxist theoretician immigrant and his immigrant wife.


    Like his brother David, Ed Milliband was 100% Polish Jew, (but was very foreign looking) Not too surprising, but it is disconcerting the extent to which the alien elites doing the thinking for the Tories are not even Jewish now.

    The ten thousand people coming across the Channel are Albanians seeking asylum, which is costing billions because they have to be put in emergency accommodation. As a globalist. Sunak no problem with regular immigration to fill vacancies , which keeps the wages of low earning workers of all ethnicities in Britain from rising

    But Liz Truss’s extraordinary comments ... in a book, Britannia Unchained, she co-authored with four other Tory MPs including Dominic Raab {now Deputy Prime Minister under Sunak} and Kwasi Kwarteng, her bull likely chancellor if she makes it to No 10.

    “Once they enter the workplace, the British are among the worst idlers in the world,” they wrote. “We work among the lowest hours, we retire early and our productivity is poor. Whereas Indian children aspire to be doctors or businessmen, the British are more interested in football and pop music.”
     

    Replies: @A123

  541. @AP
    @silviosilver


    “When the Holy Inquisition burned heretics it was for the purpose of their salvation.”

    I have never heard of such a thing
     
    It’s commonly heard, the fire was supposed to have a purifying effect.

    Heretics were persecuted lest they infect the rest of the flock with their incorrect beliefs and thus imperil their immortal souls.
     
    That too of course.

    I think the copey idea that heretics were burned for their own good is something you’ve invented. Prove me wrong.
     
    I don’t have time for a real search, this is the first thing that came up on Google:

    https://trueblood.fandom.com/wiki/Spanish_Inquisition

    “Burning was believed to cleanse the soul”

    So I didn’t invent it.

    Replies: @silviosilver

    It’s commonly heard, the fire was supposed to have a purifying effect.

    We’re not talking about some mere “purifying effect.” You are claiming that people who died in a state of mortal sin were saved by burning them. You are claiming the Inquisition believed this, ie it is Catholic doctrine that unrepentant heretics are saved by burning them.

    I remind you, your own words were: “When the Holy Inquisition burned heretics it was for the purpose of their salvation.” Do you really want to stand by this?

    https://trueblood.fandom.com/wiki/Spanish_Inquisition

    A dorky fan site of a dorky TV show, lol.

    Take a break bro, you’re usually a lot better than this.

    • Replies: @AP
    @silviosilver


    You are claiming the Inquisition believed this, ie it is Catholic doctrine that unrepentant heretics are saved by burning them
     
    If they repent during the process of purification by fire they are saved. What is hard to understand?

    A dorky fan site of a dorky TV show, lol.
     
    Lol, it came up on the google search though.

    Take a break bro, you’re usually a lot better than this.
     
    Thanks for noticing. I’m in process of vacation travelling so my posts will be sparse unless I get bored.

    Replies: @silviosilver

  542. @Beckow
    @silviosilver

    As so often, AP lives in his made-up world of how he would like things to be, from Catholic Church to the evils of 'socialism'; it was planted in his over-eager mind in very poor schools. And by culture based on self-therapy and control of hoi polloi.

    The concept of Purgatory was gradually invented only in the 13.-14. centuries, it is a marginal part of the catholic faith. Heretics and witches were brutally murdered to maintain order, to scare people, to keep the existing hierarchy in place. What they told them as they lit the fires was of no consequence. But AP believes, as he must - his self-image is centered on not being common, so he invents nonsense: fancy ancestors, well meaning Church, non-existing history, etc...a fish barely out of water.

    Replies: @silviosilver, @AP

    You lie about me as you lie about everything else.

    And there is an element of projection in your lies; you are the semi-educated product of socialist schools, repeating the anti-Christian and anti-Catholic myths that were stuffed into your simple mind by your masters. He schools in the USA followed the British-Protestant tradition and probably had similar myths about the Holy Inquisition.

    The concept of Purgatory was gradually invented only in the 13.-14. centuries, it is a marginal part of the catholic faith

    We Eastern Catholics and the Orthodox don’t talk about Purgatory.

    But numerous devout Roman Catholics find meaning in their physical suffering by the idea that suffering in this world will reduce their time in purgatory. I heard this several times when I had worked in a setting with terminally patients, it was not a marginal idea.

    • Replies: @Beckow
    @AP


    ...numerous devout Roman Catholics find meaning in their physical suffering by the idea that suffering in this world will reduce their time in purgatory.
     
    Well, to each his own, but in the context we are discussing it means nothing. You can't apply this voluntary choice to find meaning in suffering to the numerous victims of the Catholic Church. Millions of people who were over the centuries burnt to death, tortured, deprived of limbs, imprisoned - they didn't find the suffering enriching and didn't see it as a nice shortcut through Purgatory to get to Heaven sooner.

    It goes against human biology - they were tortured and killed by the Catholic Church that you so desperately defend. You spend all your time downplaying the horrible past of the Church, Habsburgs and assorted other aristocrats and maniacs, like the current Nazi revivalists in Galicia - but your also massively exaggerate what was a reaction to these crimes by the other side, call them 'left', working class, regular people, or socialists. There was a lot to atone for - you not seeing it is either result of a really bad education, or you pretend and like to side with the bloody feudal satanism of our European past.

    , @Barbarossa
    @AP


    We Eastern Catholics
     
    For some reason I thought you were Roman. Or am I remembering correctly you switched rites?
  543. @silviosilver
    @Beckow


    What they told them as they lit the fires was of no consequence.
     
    It's of no consequence to the casual unbeliever today, just looking to go about his life, but it is of some consequence for a truer historical understanding (an understanding which bleeds into our present political calculus in some instances). I think it matters that the Inquisition wasn't motivated solely by a desire to maintain control and order, rather because they were, in addition, fanatically convinced that heresies would lead the flock astray, damning their souls to hell and causing all sorts of civil mayhem in the process. (Eg the whole Arian episode, which the church seems to have retained some institutional memory of.) Plenty of ugly behavior involved in stamping heresies out, of course, which partisan Catholics are forever trying to sugarcoat.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk, @Coconuts

    I think it matters that the Inquisition wasn’t motivated solely by a desire to maintain control and order, rather because they were, in addition, fanatically convinced that heresies would lead the flock astray, damning their souls to hell and causing all sorts of civil mayhem in the process.

    I think they used to have the idea that the Kingdom of God in heaven was the perfect society, the Church on earth was an imperfect manifestation of that, then the temporal kingdom outside of the Church was the next rung down in terms of perfection. Even though it was flawed and deformed by sin, it was still a creation and reflection of God and had its role to play in the chain of being.

    That would be one way in which religious division and sects, once they moved out of theological discussions among clerics and started forming groups of partisans, could become a political issue.

    The idea that the fires of purgatory were necessary to refine and cleanse souls of sin was definitely important in Latin Christianity in medieval times, there were detailed arguments about the cleansing power of these fires with the Orthodox, who rejected the idea that burning of this sort was involved in Theosis. A lot of time and effort went into prayers and masses for the souls of the dead and carrying out holy works to reduce their sufferings in the purgatorial fires. I don’t know if the Inquisition specifically thought that burning unrepentant heretics would help purify them and increase their chances of access to heaven, but it doesn’t seem impossible.

    There was also the idea that holding heretical beliefs made you a physical mutant, in Spain this became linked to the controversial ‘purity of blood’ idea, where holding heretical beliefs, or engaging in Jewish and Muslim practices contaminated an individual’s blood. In France during the Wars of Religion I know they sometimes dissected Protestant bodies to try to find signs of heretical mutations.

    In the early 20th C. Portuguese nationalists like Antonio Sardinha were definitely defending the idea that the Inquisition had been important to defend national unity and the spirit of the race. Joseph de Maistre is pretty famous for being another outspoken champion of the Inquisition in political terms.

    • Thanks: AP
  544. @Sean
    While his analysis is excellent as it has been from the very begining, I don't follow General (Ret.) Ben Hodges on why Ukraine winning and Putin being overthrown within a few months into next year is not going to come as such a surprise to Putin that he will be unable to get Russia's tactical nukes into a state of readiness with the initial rationale of sending a signal to Ukraine/ US to stop the Ukrainian army advancing. From such a signal there would be a clear path to battlefield use.

    It seems Hodges has an unspoken assumption that any such signal would not be an honest one because Putin would not be able to get an order to detonate a nuke on the Ukrainian army executed by his subordinates, Right now that may, or may not, be true; yet if the Russians are driven back over the next several months and tens more thousands of Russian soldiers are killed plus a few more generals, there will be a desire in the surviving and humiliated Russian armed forces for vengeance, and a belief that Russia would not merely change leadership as a result of an outright loss, but break up would not be entirely ridiculous.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Mikhail

    While his analysis is excellent as it has been from the very begining, I don’t follow General (Ret.) Ben Hodges on why Ukraine winning and Putin being overthrown within a few months into next year is not going to come as such a surprise to Putin that he will be unable to get Russia’s tactical nukes into a state of readiness with the initial rationale of sending a signal to Ukraine/ US to stop the Ukrainian army advancing.

    More like he’s a fanatical crackpot, especially when compared to Jacques Baud, Danny Davis and yes Douglas Macgregor.

    • Replies: @Sean
    @Mikhail

    At the begining of the war, Magregor started saying what everyone else was, but he is still saying it even though the US is proving a very, very much greater level of support for Ukraine than anyone originally expected. I think although he is a corrective to US prppaganda to a certain extent, Macgregor has began to delude himself; I certainly think his cautious credence given to Russian claims shows he is being duped and duping himself into believing the Russian overestimation of Britain's clandestine capability, ruthlessness, and daring. The UK public have an insatiable appetite for wild stories about the SAS, and the Daily Mail ECT are happy to oblige.

    Here is some reality therapy. Why would Ukraine need anyone from the British Army to blow something up? The SAS have training in explosives demolition, but for a bridge as big as Kerch they would need to get opinion from specialists in relevant fields. The SAS are in Ukraine, but mainly as glorified bodyguards. Ukraine has no civil and or military engineers?; course they have, some of whom have been over the bridge. Anyway, Britain has not got the balls for something like that--or the pipeline. Macgregor takes the possibility of both being the Brits seriously.


    The more fool the Russians for believing in Minsk, because they have lost all the advantages they had over Ukraine in 2015. Now there is an open ended American commitment to Ukraine. Meanwhile, house prices in Kiev where Russians arrived in parade Uniforms and the FSB commander tried to pick out a beautiful apartment overlooking the River for himself, are continuing to rise. the manpower and strategic space of Ukraine allied to US advanced weapons and endless supply means war without end. The style of Ukrainian soldiering in this phase of the war is less 'gets angry when you miss him' Joe Frazier, and more Ali. Ceasing to threaten Kiev was a major mistake. Almost as bad as not mobilising in March

    Russians arms's quality is lowering because RusFed science has not kept up; their academics are less competitive with each other and have less time for practical innovation in engineering through workload and being 'lost in math'.


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q2DNcBUDoaE
    "[Physicist turned Defence Secretary Ash] Carter kicked off a host of projects to bring in civilian tech-sector best practices, like bug bounties. [...] This legacy of Carter’s ---s by investing in cutting-edge technology — especially tech in which he saw potential for rapid advances that could tilt the balance of power towards the US. Long-range, precision-guided weapons were one big part of that. But so were artificial intelligence, robotics, and unmanned vehicles, as demonstrated by his gleeful robo-boat demonstration back in 2016; since then, there’s even been an SM-6 launch off an unmanned vessel. "

    Soviet system theoreticians are losing ground to the US practical emphasis because there is big money in defence in US universities. If Putin prioritises winning in Ukraine, defeating him will entail killing approaching 100,000 Russian troops. Russia is more about mass effect than advanced tech. They are firing off silly drones scores at the time instead. Quality over quantity is the US way. and they have not even sent Ukraine the Vietnam era HAWK system yet let alone its successor missile defense system PATRIOT. Fourteen HIMARS launchers blunted the Russian offensive, if they got going again Ukraine will be given the much heavier and longer range Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS), and the Russian army is nothing without its artillery logistics.

    Replies: @Mikhail

  545. @silviosilver
    @AP


    It’s commonly heard, the fire was supposed to have a purifying effect.
     
    We're not talking about some mere "purifying effect." You are claiming that people who died in a state of mortal sin were saved by burning them. You are claiming the Inquisition believed this, ie it is Catholic doctrine that unrepentant heretics are saved by burning them.

    I remind you, your own words were: “When the Holy Inquisition burned heretics it was for the purpose of their salvation.” Do you really want to stand by this?

    https://trueblood.fandom.com/wiki/Spanish_Inquisition
     
    A dorky fan site of a dorky TV show, lol.

    Take a break bro, you're usually a lot better than this.

    Replies: @AP

    You are claiming the Inquisition believed this, ie it is Catholic doctrine that unrepentant heretics are saved by burning them

    If they repent during the process of purification by fire they are saved. What is hard to understand?

    A dorky fan site of a dorky TV show, lol.

    Lol, it came up on the google search though.

    Take a break bro, you’re usually a lot better than this.

    Thanks for noticing. I’m in process of vacation travelling so my posts will be sparse unless I get bored.

    • Replies: @silviosilver
    @AP


    If they repent during the process of purification by fire they are saved. What is hard to understand?
     
    I take it you'd now like to revise your claim to make it read they were burned for the purposes of forcing them to repent? I doubt you'll have any more success furnishing evidence for the revision than you had for the original claim.

    Lol, it came up on the google search though.
     
    Yes, I can tell. You made a claim you couldn't defend and found yourself clutching at straws.

    I’m in process of vacation travelling so my posts will be sparse unless I get bored.
     
    Returning home around the time we click over into OT#201 and the whole thing blows over, I gather.

    : )
  546. @A123
    @Sher Singh


    Notes on the tropes

    First Hindu PM
    Hindu Supremacists
    Desi Bro
    Upper caste
    Beef and alcohol
    Ganesha murti [used to secure £££]
    Faux anti-colonials of India [because successful]

    Implication: real Hindu decolonisers are poor and must wear Gandhi loincloth in 10 Downing St.
     

    Leftoids use race, religion, and other forms of polarized division to drive their emotionalist dogma. Anything that does not fit the stereotype must be crushed and ridiculed to protect Globalist theology.

    If Sunak was chosen by the Labour party, you would have none of this. However, a racial minority on the other side breaks the narrative. Thus, he must be "depicted" as white. Sunak said this on the record: (1)


    Rishi Sunak tells Macron that Channel must be 'completely unviable' for people traffickers as he pushes for new small boats deal with France
    ...
    The leaders committed to deepening our partnership to deter deadly journeys across the Channel that benefit organised criminals.

    'The Prime Minister and President Macron looked forward to meeting soon and to holding a UK-France summit next year.'

    Mr Sunak also wants to set tough new targets for the Home Office on asylum processing times, so that eight out of ten are completed within six months, The Times reported.
     

    SJW's categorize this migration stance as White Nationalist. Therefore, Sunak = White Racist. Braverman = Even More White Nationalist.

    This should be no surprise to anyone. In America SJW's regularly state, Justice Clearance Thomas = White.

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11365131/Sunak-tells-Macron-Channel-crossings-completely-unviable.html

    Replies: @Sean

    Truss was deliberately (in line with a policy proposed along with her Ugandan Chancellor published in 2012), cutting back on government revenue to force a shrinking of the state including its immigration controls, the standing down of which was her main practical proposal for economic growth. She kept the Christian turned Buddhist Braverman at the Home Office but cut her out of decisions, so Braverman resigned.

    If Sunak was chosen by the Labour party, you would have none of this.

    Its not so long ago that the Labour Party Leadership contest came down to the two sons of a Marxist theoretician immigrant and his immigrant wife.

    Like his brother David, Ed Milliband was 100% Polish Jew, (but was very foreign looking) Not too surprising, but it is disconcerting the extent to which the alien elites doing the thinking for the Tories are not even Jewish now.

    The ten thousand people coming across the Channel are Albanians seeking asylum, which is costing billions because they have to be put in emergency accommodation. As a globalist. Sunak no problem with regular immigration to fill vacancies , which keeps the wages of low earning workers of all ethnicities in Britain from rising

    But Liz Truss’s extraordinary comments … in a book, Britannia Unchained, she co-authored with four other Tory MPs including Dominic Raab {now Deputy Prime Minister under Sunak} and Kwasi Kwarteng, her bull likely chancellor if she makes it to No 10.

    “Once they enter the workplace, the British are among the worst idlers in the world,” they wrote. “We work among the lowest hours, we retire early and our productivity is poor. Whereas Indian children aspire to be doctors or businessmen, the British are more interested in football and pop music.”

    • Replies: @A123
    @Sean


    The ten thousand people coming across the Channel are Albanians seeking asylum, which is costing billions because they have to be put in emergency accommodation.
     
    I do not understand why more nations do not adopt the "first safe country" standard for border(∆) entry Asylum/Refugee claims.

    For the UK, "Was France a 'safe country' for the Albanian asylum claimant?" If so, no asylum claim is possibly valid. The individual is sent home or back to France.

    For the U.S. (1), " Was Mexico a 'safe country' for the Central or South American asylum claimant?" If so, no asylum claim is possibly valid. The individual is sent home or back to Mexico.

    80%+ of the foolishness could easily be ended by applying internationally accepted norms.

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (∆) Special cases not related to border crossing (e.g. Afghanis who served as translators for U.S. troops) is a different issue. The "first safe country" standard would not apply.

    (1) https://dailycaller.com/2019/07/15/border-immigration-asylum-rule-first-safe-country-enter/

  547. @Bashibuzuk
    @Mr. Hack

    Mr Hack, the nation states and Empires are already obsolete bordering on derelict, when compared to the forces of Globalization. Russia is just one of the most advanced in its decadence. US and Europe will end up the same or worse.

    Russians have experienced Communism, which is an extreme form of leftist internationalist Globalization, first hand and for three generations. In the Globalist West (including its Extreme Orient dominions), it has been ongoing since perhaps a couple of generations or less and in a less extreme leftist manner. The Globalist still use nations and historical countries in the West as decoys, just like a parasitic wasp uses a paralyzed insect to inoculate its larvae.

    The results in the West fill end up being as bad or even worse as they were in Sovok. Plus mass control techniques and surveillance state have evolved much further beyond anything CheKa / NKVD / KGB might have dreamed of. We already live in a soft totalitarian society. Has it anything to do with the will of the Founding Fathers in US ? I think it doesn't.

    In the same vein, RusFed has nothing to do with the Holy Rus / Third Rome / Russian Empire. It is just a mafia state which job was to pump both ressources and moneys towards the Globalized Western economies and financial institutions. It went rogue and turned on its handlers. It is being punished right now, while the Chinese OBOR Globalization project is being kept in check.

    Coconut mentioned Archeofuturism, perhaps inspired by the late Guillaume Faye, the World is possibly indeed moving in that direction. Barbarossa mentioned clans and tribes, he is probably right. We have to move back to more natural patterns of organization to ensure our bloodlines' survival.

    I am done with the nation state simulacra, they're used to fool and distract us. They're shadows of the past glory, unreal and used by our enemies to hide behind.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    I appreciate this very succinct answer of yours that clearly spells out your beliefs about the world’s future trajectory.

    I do have some doubts about a return to human reorganization based on a model of past clannish behavior. These models, after all, were already prominent in the past and went on to form larger organizational units including nations, states and empires. Larger and larger organizational units forming, until we now have the ever present and expanding models of globalism. The only way that I can see a reversal back to models based on tribes etc, is if apocalyptic scenarios evolve where survival is based upon the organization of smaller mixed ethnic/racial groups who chose to band together to survive. a sort of Mad Max sort of scenario. The trends seem to point to the linking together of nation/states into larger and larger groupings for various reasons.

    Ubiquitous travel amongst individuals to all corners of the world for business and educational (and recreational) purposes has helped to break down the walls of the past. World wide communication via television, radio and the internet has done its fair share in eroding man made borders too. I don’t see your children that have been brought up in France or AP’s children that have grown up in the US ever returning to either Russia or Ukraine to take part in some sort of “more natural patterns of organization to ensure our bloodlines’ survival.” Do you…really? With all due respect, it doesn’t seem possible?

    • Replies: @Bashibuzuk
    @Mr. Hack

    I believe that even without any apocalyptic scenarios we are currently evolving inside a major population bottleneck that will in the next few generations erase most part of the developed world genetic lineages. Young people simply don't want to bother building families and raising children.

    If economy is keeping on a downward slope, or a world war starts that would obviously not help at all. But even if economic downturn is avoided, the psychological crisis and the spiritual one are probably going only to get worse. We are being outpaced by the technological developments, our human nature cannot follow with us staying human and psychologically balanced. Perhaps a choice will have to be made between staying human and clinging to the social and professional achievements. Perhaps we will need to leave Sodom behind and wander into wilderness (so to speak).

    My dedication goes first and foremost to my bloodline, it is a thread uniting my ancestors and my offspring. I am just a link in a chain. I have to do my best to help this thread going past the bottleneck. Everything else is of secondary importance.

    And you are right, my kids will never return to RusFed, except on vacation and God only knows where they might end up living in our globalized world. Still, I have to encourage and support them to have families and kids of their own. In today's circumstances it is not as simple as it once was. The world is becoming increasingly complex and unpredictable. It is becoming increasingly dangerous. Things fall apart and the center cannot hold...

    Tough times ahead.

  548. @Beckow
    @Bashibuzuk


    These massive projects actually all end up in the way of the Babel Tower, they crumble while the multitudes that built them divide and dissolve.
     
    The multitudes are still here, still breathing. Maybe they don't built much now and even simple maintenance has disappeared, but the momentum remains. Most people have nowhere to go as the modern globalist Tower of Babel crumbles. Everyone still clings to it, they join maddened Halloween crowds to experience it and go willingly to death for the sake of keeping the imported nonsense beliefs going, Like a youthful love that aged it is a combination of ritual, duty, and nagging fear that it is no longer meaningful. In the big picture it is bizarre that people die in Seoul for Halloween - a cargo cult sacrifice so disconnected from Korea that it indeed resembles a death cult.

    I usually think of the people afflicted with the modern liberal malady as dead-enders. They stopped considering what happens after the end and fully embraced the biological divine equation of life-and-death. Eventually they chose - maybe rationally or maybe out of hedonism - to live it up fully as individuals, human biology be damned. It is a natural progression. The current one, the last and most massive liberal wave in the human history, started with the Enlightenment.

    We reached a peak in the last few years: the uber-liberalism is everywhere, it even dominates its so called enemies. Putin is by all standards a liberal guy, so is the Pope, the children of Chinese nomenklatura, the crazy bush-fighters in Africa, and the Arab sheiks. They all bought into it, because it was good, it delivered. After the peak, some sort of a civil war was inevitable - watch any small group of animals as they get stranded, they start elbowing, shoving and eventually an all out fight erupts. When the road up is closed, we retrace the steps going back - the elites call it the reset.

    In Eastern Europe it will be very bad: it is the epicenter of the global civil war. Ukies stepped up as valiant warriors for the peak global uber-liberalism - nobody else seemed to have the cojones. Maybe the Poles will join in. There is a deep irony in who is now fighting to keep the globalism going slightly longer. But who would we expect to fight? It was the Goths against the Goths in most actual battles as Rome was easing into its oblivion. I find observing it quite enjoyable, painful but very real: lining up to die for a dead idea is very ancient. Like we are killing each others' gods forgetting that we are the ones who created them.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk, @A123

    We reached a peak in the last few years: the uber-liberalism is everywhere,

    They all bought into it, because it was good, it delivered. After the peak, some sort of a civil war was inevitable – watch any small group of animals as they get stranded, they start elbowing, shoving and eventually an all out fight erupts. When the road up is closed, we retrace the steps going back – the elites call it the reset.

    In Eastern Europe it will be very bad: it is the epicenter of the global civil war

    EE has a good chance of coming out OK. Hungary and Czechia have cohesive culture. Poland, outside of Warsaw, is also pretty solid. And Warsaw youth, when faced with need for food, are highly likely to change mental outlook.

    The largest disasters will be in Western Europe. France, Germany, and Sweden no longer have anything left resembling a national identity to fall back on.
    ___

    The wild cards are America and China.

    CCP colonialism has locked in huge energy and food imports as a necessity. If one or two colonies have meltdowns, the mainland can send the PLA to restore order. If the “Reset” is both sudden and wide spread, the CCP could be left with a population they cannot feed.

    In the U.S., Christian Populism (a.k.a. MAGA) is building a common culture across racial lines. How long will it take to progress? With sufficient cohesion, containment of Blue Cities while they burn themselves may be a viable option.

    Utah will prosper even if the crisis is especially serious: (1)

    The First Presidency recommends that Church members “begin their home storage by storing the basic foods that would be required to keep them alive if they did not have anything else to eat.” After they have a year’s supply of the basics, they may then add other foods they are accustomed to eating regularly. (See First Presidency letter, Jan. 20, 2002.)

    The best case scenario is a Slow Reset rather than a Civil War. Gradual decoupling will result in both MAGA and Chinese workers coming out as big winners. It is not a zero sum game. National resiliency is a virtue and strength for each nation, even if it requires small coherent groups like the Visegrád 4.

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/ensign/2006/03/random-sampler/food-storage-for-one-year

  549. @Sean
    @A123

    Truss was deliberately (in line with a policy proposed along with her Ugandan Chancellor published in 2012), cutting back on government revenue to force a shrinking of the state including its immigration controls, the standing down of which was her main practical proposal for economic growth. She kept the Christian turned Buddhist Braverman at the Home Office but cut her out of decisions, so Braverman resigned.

    If Sunak was chosen by the Labour party, you would have none of this.
     

    Its not so long ago that the Labour Party Leadership contest came down to the two sons of a Marxist theoretician immigrant and his immigrant wife.


    Like his brother David, Ed Milliband was 100% Polish Jew, (but was very foreign looking) Not too surprising, but it is disconcerting the extent to which the alien elites doing the thinking for the Tories are not even Jewish now.

    The ten thousand people coming across the Channel are Albanians seeking asylum, which is costing billions because they have to be put in emergency accommodation. As a globalist. Sunak no problem with regular immigration to fill vacancies , which keeps the wages of low earning workers of all ethnicities in Britain from rising

    But Liz Truss’s extraordinary comments ... in a book, Britannia Unchained, she co-authored with four other Tory MPs including Dominic Raab {now Deputy Prime Minister under Sunak} and Kwasi Kwarteng, her bull likely chancellor if she makes it to No 10.

    “Once they enter the workplace, the British are among the worst idlers in the world,” they wrote. “We work among the lowest hours, we retire early and our productivity is poor. Whereas Indian children aspire to be doctors or businessmen, the British are more interested in football and pop music.”
     

    Replies: @A123

    The ten thousand people coming across the Channel are Albanians seeking asylum, which is costing billions because they have to be put in emergency accommodation.

    I do not understand why more nations do not adopt the “first safe country” standard for border(∆) entry Asylum/Refugee claims.

    For the UK, “Was France a ‘safe country’ for the Albanian asylum claimant?” If so, no asylum claim is possibly valid. The individual is sent home or back to France.

    For the U.S. (1), ” Was Mexico a ‘safe country’ for the Central or South American asylum claimant?” If so, no asylum claim is possibly valid. The individual is sent home or back to Mexico.

    80%+ of the foolishness could easily be ended by applying internationally accepted norms.

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (∆) Special cases not related to border crossing (e.g. Afghanis who served as translators for U.S. troops) is a different issue. The “first safe country” standard would not apply.

    (1) https://dailycaller.com/2019/07/15/border-immigration-asylum-rule-first-safe-country-enter/

  550. @QCIC
    @Mr. Hack

    All major countries are highly corrupt and lie a lot, so it is difficult to interpret what we read.

    My simple view is that Russia views the Western meddling in Ukraine as an existential threat and they responded militarily and economically, which was the only option capable of stopping this meddling. Most of the Western responses to the SMO were expected, so much of what Russia is doing is preplanned. The mobilization was surely preplanned. There are many things yet to come which seem fairly predictable at this point.

    From a Russian perspective, some of the points discussed by the narrator are features, not bugs. The minor exodus gets rid of people and companies who do not like Russia and are often subsidized by the West in some way to cause trouble. Militarization of the economy may lead to new corruption, but that is a fair trade if it also gets rid of some of the entrenched internationalist corruption which has hobbled the economy for so long. In a militarized situation, the perpetrators of new corruption may find themselves in big trouble if their activities are explicitly anti-Russian.

    People in poor areas often are driven into the military either by force or propaganda. Once this happens their families tend to want to win the war and get them home. The families "support our troops" (Where have I heard that?) and are willing to deal with hardship.

    Estimating the performance of the Russian economy while the European, US and Chinese economies are also bearing unprecedented stresses is a Fool's Errand.

    The longer this goes on the more I suspect the Russian response is fairly inspired.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    As I follow the economic news regarding all the major parts of the world, it’s no foolish thing to follow this type of news within Russia iteself, especially during war time. What made the paper that Vladislav Inozemtsev wrote so very prescient is that he’s ostensibly an insider, that’s spent many years at the top as a serious Russian economist. It’s too bad that nobody here bothered to watch the video clip that I included – could have been the start of an interesting mini thread here. Instead we end up getting the same old, same old. I don’t get it, I know that many of the readers of this blog have a keen interest in economics?…

    • Replies: @QCIC
    @Mr. Hack

    I watched the video before commenting. Do you have a link to an English translation of the paper? Based on a quick glance at some of his online articles I think Inozemtsev has long had an anti-Kremlin stance so his views are consistent with that. Is he one of the so-called Atlanticists?

    His ability to publish what was summarized in the video suggests the Russian press is more free than some commenters would have us believe :)

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

  551. @Mikhail
    @Sean


    While his analysis is excellent as it has been from the very begining, I don’t follow General (Ret.) Ben Hodges on why Ukraine winning and Putin being overthrown within a few months into next year is not going to come as such a surprise to Putin that he will be unable to get Russia’s tactical nukes into a state of readiness with the initial rationale of sending a signal to Ukraine/ US to stop the Ukrainian army advancing.
     
    More like he's a fanatical crackpot, especially when compared to Jacques Baud, Danny Davis and yes Douglas Macgregor.

    Replies: @Sean

    At the begining of the war, Magregor started saying what everyone else was, but he is still saying it even though the US is proving a very, very much greater level of support for Ukraine than anyone originally expected. I think although he is a corrective to US prppaganda to a certain extent, Macgregor has began to delude himself; I certainly think his cautious credence given to Russian claims shows he is being duped and duping himself into believing the Russian overestimation of Britain’s clandestine capability, ruthlessness, and daring. The UK public have an insatiable appetite for wild stories about the SAS, and the Daily Mail ECT are happy to oblige.

    Here is some reality therapy. Why would Ukraine need anyone from the British Army to blow something up? The SAS have training in explosives demolition, but for a bridge as big as Kerch they would need to get opinion from specialists in relevant fields. The SAS are in Ukraine, but mainly as glorified bodyguards. Ukraine has no civil and or military engineers?; course they have, some of whom have been over the bridge. Anyway, Britain has not got the balls for something like that–or the pipeline. Macgregor takes the possibility of both being the Brits seriously.

    The more fool the Russians for believing in Minsk, because they have lost all the advantages they had over Ukraine in 2015. Now there is an open ended American commitment to Ukraine. Meanwhile, house prices in Kiev where Russians arrived in parade Uniforms and the FSB commander tried to pick out a beautiful apartment overlooking the River for himself, are continuing to rise. the manpower and strategic space of Ukraine allied to US advanced weapons and endless supply means war without end. The style of Ukrainian soldiering in this phase of the war is less ‘gets angry when you miss him’ Joe Frazier, and more Ali. Ceasing to threaten Kiev was a major mistake. Almost as bad as not mobilising in March

    Russians arms’s quality is lowering because RusFed science has not kept up; their academics are less competitive with each other and have less time for practical innovation in engineering through workload and being ‘lost in math’.

    “[Physicist turned Defence Secretary Ash] Carter kicked off a host of projects to bring in civilian tech-sector best practices, like bug bounties. […] This legacy of Carter’s —s by investing in cutting-edge technology — especially tech in which he saw potential for rapid advances that could tilt the balance of power towards the US. Long-range, precision-guided weapons were one big part of that. But so were artificial intelligence, robotics, and unmanned vehicles, as demonstrated by his gleeful robo-boat demonstration back in 2016; since then, there’s even been an SM-6 launch off an unmanned vessel. ”

    Soviet system theoreticians are losing ground to the US practical emphasis because there is big money in defence in US universities. If Putin prioritises winning in Ukraine, defeating him will entail killing approaching 100,000 Russian troops. Russia is more about mass effect than advanced tech. They are firing off silly drones scores at the time instead. Quality over quantity is the US way. and they have not even sent Ukraine the Vietnam era HAWK system yet let alone its successor missile defense system PATRIOT. Fourteen HIMARS launchers blunted the Russian offensive, if they got going again Ukraine will be given the much heavier and longer range Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS), and the Russian army is nothing without its artillery logistics.

    • Replies: @Mikhail
    @Sean


    At the begining of the war, Magregor started saying what everyone else was, but he is still saying it even though the US is proving a very, very much greater level of support for Ukraine than anyone originally expected. I think although he is a corrective to US prppaganda to a certain extent, Macgregor has began to delude himself; I certainly think his cautious credence given to Russian claims shows he is being duped and duping himself into believing the Russian overestimation of Britain’s clandestine capability, ruthlessness, and daring. The UK public have an insatiable appetite for wild stories about the SAS, and the Daily Mail ECT are happy to oblige.
     
    Macgregor still not as off the wall as Hodges. The latter believing among other things that Crimea will fall in the next 12 months.

    The more fool the Russians for believing in Minsk, because they have lost all the advantages they had over Ukraine in 2015. Now there is an open ended American commitment to Ukraine. Meanwhile, house prices in Kiev where Russians arrived in parade Uniforms and the FSB commander tried to pick out a beautiful apartment overlooking the River for himself, are continuing to rise. the manpower and strategic space of Ukraine allied to US advanced weapons and endless supply means war without end. The style of Ukrainian soldiering in this phase of the war is less ‘gets angry when you miss him’ Joe Frazier, and more Ali. Ceasing to threaten Kiev was a major mistake. Almost as bad as not mobilising in March

    Russians arms’s quality is lowering because RusFed science has not kept up; their academics are less competitive with each other and have less time for practical innovation in engineering through workload and being ‘lost in math’.
     

    In 2015, Russia wasn't as strong, in addition to wanting to be sure that (the newly reunified with Russia) Crimea would be secure. Hind sight on the initial and ongoing manner of the SMO. USSR made gross mistakes about Finland and still prevailed. The same likely to happen in this current situation.

    Kiev regime is very much militarily wasted - much more so than Russia. By 1917, Russia was much better militarily equipped than in 1914. Prolonged mass losses do have a way of changing the motivation to fight on.

    US and other Western nations are very much challenged in arms production, while lacking in the development of hypersonic weapons.

    Situations like this won't help the cause to fight Russia to the last Ukrainian:

    https://www.rt.com/news/565616-finland-ukraine-weapons-gangs/

    Replies: @Sean

  552. Bashibuzuk says:
    @Mr. Hack
    @Bashibuzuk

    I appreciate this very succinct answer of yours that clearly spells out your beliefs about the world's future trajectory.

    I do have some doubts about a return to human reorganization based on a model of past clannish behavior. These models, after all, were already prominent in the past and went on to form larger organizational units including nations, states and empires. Larger and larger organizational units forming, until we now have the ever present and expanding models of globalism. The only way that I can see a reversal back to models based on tribes etc, is if apocalyptic scenarios evolve where survival is based upon the organization of smaller mixed ethnic/racial groups who chose to band together to survive. a sort of Mad Max sort of scenario. The trends seem to point to the linking together of nation/states into larger and larger groupings for various reasons.

    Ubiquitous travel amongst individuals to all corners of the world for business and educational (and recreational) purposes has helped to break down the walls of the past. World wide communication via television, radio and the internet has done its fair share in eroding man made borders too. I don't see your children that have been brought up in France or AP's children that have grown up in the US ever returning to either Russia or Ukraine to take part in some sort of "more natural patterns of organization to ensure our bloodlines’ survival." Do you...really? With all due respect, it doesn't seem possible?

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

    I believe that even without any apocalyptic scenarios we are currently evolving inside a major population bottleneck that will in the next few generations erase most part of the developed world genetic lineages. Young people simply don’t want to bother building families and raising children.

    If economy is keeping on a downward slope, or a world war starts that would obviously not help at all. But even if economic downturn is avoided, the psychological crisis and the spiritual one are probably going only to get worse. We are being outpaced by the technological developments, our human nature cannot follow with us staying human and psychologically balanced. Perhaps a choice will have to be made between staying human and clinging to the social and professional achievements. Perhaps we will need to leave Sodom behind and wander into wilderness (so to speak).

    My dedication goes first and foremost to my bloodline, it is a thread uniting my ancestors and my offspring. I am just a link in a chain. I have to do my best to help this thread going past the bottleneck. Everything else is of secondary importance.

    And you are right, my kids will never return to RusFed, except on vacation and God only knows where they might end up living in our globalized world. Still, I have to encourage and support them to have families and kids of their own. In today’s circumstances it is not as simple as it once was. The world is becoming increasingly complex and unpredictable. It is becoming increasingly dangerous. Things fall apart and the center cannot hold

    Tough times ahead.

  553. @Coconuts
    @Mikel


    Humanity doesn’t need more people willing to die and kill for political or religious issues, it needs to move past that ancestral tradition.
     
    One way of seeing this is as the idea of liberal pacification and the end of politics; the only discussions that will take place in such a universal human society will be similar to those between academics in their professional capacity, or purely technical in nature between specialists similar to engineering discussions. There won't be any conflicts of interest that gives rise to the formation of competing groups and the friend/enemy group distinction anywhere.

    (From some points of view this conception seems like a secularisation of the older Christian tradition about Providence (into Progress) and the advent of the Kingdom of God (pacified Humanity). Reading about the Enlightenment and then German Idealism in Hegel and Fichte, later Marx's materialism, it sometimes feels like watching how this secularisation took place.)

    Understanding of evolution and human evolution specifically raises questions about how plausible the advent of this universal state of pacification is. Possibly it is not even a possibility given the kind of animal humans are.

    Attempts to bring it into existence in reality may end up more like a kind of universal despotism and mouse utopia, where conditions are so mismatched for normal human reproduction that large parts of the human population dies away through sterility, illness and evolutionarily aberrant behaviour. Good for the perpetuation of the genes of the survivors though?


    We are probably not capable of destroying our own species in a war yet but, as time progresses, I see no reason why we won’t reach that capability so learning to avoid wars between nations, tribes and religious or political groups is more than just preventing the senseless massacres that we have experienced throughout history, it’s a necessary condition for the ultimate preservation of our species.
     
    This is part of the argument for things like archaeofuturism; the Enlightenment state ceases to represent 'the externalisation of mankind's reason' or the instrument of infinite Progress ('God standing on earth') and becomes a major threat in itself.

    Replies: @Beckow, @Mikel

    Understanding of evolution and human evolution specifically raises questions about how plausible the advent of this universal state of pacification is. Possibly it is not even a possibility given the kind of animal humans are.

    You are probably right but the fact that there seems to be a positive correlation between the development of a country and the willingness of its inhabitants to kill or die for beliefs may be telling us something perhaps positive about human nature too.

    Granted, these people don’t much care when the professional armies of their countries do engage in pointless wars far away and may even be supportive of them, given an adequate informative conditioning (or for the simple reason of supporting their national team, so to speak). But less people willing to go to war should lead to less wars, all else being equal. In fact, how much do even professional soldiers fight for beliefs these days? I don’t think that most of them would go to war as unpaid volunteers so not much, probably.

    Another important point raised by Beckow is that historically it has been a minority at the top who have decided to start wars, especially the most ideological ones. The masses have always been brainwashed and/or directly forced to take part in the hostilities. Past the tribal state, most people probably prefer to lead peaceful lives rather than to fight enemies. Beckow then goes on a contradictory tangent with the strange claim that the Russians just had no choice but to engage in the wholesale killing of Russophones that they’re now carrying out in Eastern Ukraine but that is another matter.

    • Replies: @sudden death
    @Mikel


    Past the tribal state, most people probably prefer to lead peaceful lives rather than to fight enemies.
     
    Quite doubtful, because it might not be that universal feeling at all, Orwell's notes about this have not aged, sound like could be written yesterday (my own bolding below):

    Also he has grasped the falsity of the hedonistic attitude to life. Nearly all western thought since the last war, certainly all ‘progressive’ thought, has assumed tacitly that human beings desire nothing beyond ease, security and avoidance of pain. In such a view of life there is no room, for instance, for patriotism and the military virtues. The Socialist who finds his children playing with soldiers is usually upset, but he is never able to think of a substitute for the tin soldiers; tin pacifists somehow won’t do. Hitler, because in his own joyless mind he feels it with exceptional strength, knows that human beings don’t only want comfort, safety, short working-hours, hygiene, birth-control and, in general, common sense; they also, at least intermittently, want struggle and self-sacrifice, not to mention drums, flags and loyalty-parades. However they may be as economic theories, Fascism and Nazism are psychologically far sounder than any hedonistic conception of life. The same is probably true of Stalin’s militarised version of Socialism. All three of the great dictators have enhanced their power by imposing intolerable burdens on their peoples. Whereas Socialism, and even capitalism in a more grudging way, have said to people ‘I offer you a good time,’ Hitler has said to them ‘I offer you struggle, danger and death,’ and as a result a whole nation flings itself at his feet. Perhaps later on they will get sick of it and change their minds, as at the end of the last war. After a few years of slaughter and starvation ‘Greatest happiness of the greatest number’ is a good slogan, but at this moment ‘Better an end with horror than a horror without end’ is a winner. Now that we are fighting against the man who coined it, we ought not to underrate its emotional appeal.”
     
    https://bookmarks.reviews/george-orwells-1940-review-of-mein-kampf/

    Replies: @Mikel

    , @Beckow
    @Mikel


    ..strange claim that the Russians just had no choice but to engage in the wholesale killing of Russophones that they’re now carrying out in Eastern Ukraine
     
    The killing is part of all wars. Whether they are Russo-phones or not, in a war people in the middle die. It is very unlikely it was planned or is intentional, it simply happens in wars. I think in the West they call it 'collateral damage'.

    I have asked many times, what was the better choice for Russia? I have never heard a coherent answer. Doing nothing was not an option - Ukraine in Nato and Russian-free is not an option for them. Waiting? Pleading with loser puppets in Germany-France? What exactly is the better choice you think they had?

    Replies: @Mikel

    , @Coconuts
    @Mikel


    Another important point raised by Beckow is that historically it has been a minority at the top who have decided to start wars, especially the most ideological ones. The masses have always been brainwashed and/or directly forced to take part in the hostilities.
     
    I think the argument against this would be that it is restating the idea that a particular political formula can put an end to the emergence of the friend/enemy distinction within human groups.

    The formula here seems to be one that involves rooting out what its exponents identify as ideology and isolating the minority groups they deem to be engaged in distorting the default norm of human behaviour for unjustifiable ends. The natural or undistorted human norm is taken to be some state of pacification where people don't divide themselves into groups that start opposing each other.

    This sounds broadly similar to some of the arguments of liberalism. But ideas like this tend to give rise to a new friend/enemy distinction of their own. This is between those who place their trust in the authority of the promoters of the liberal style accounts of human nature and those who don't (who might end up being identified as the enemies of humanity).

    In liberalism there might be supplementary assumptions following from the initial ones involving spontaneous egalitarian mass participation in decision making as the human norm, the idea that society is composed of rational individuals who will inevitably reach a consensus based on universal altruistic reason etc.

    There is a kind of reverse or mirror account to the one about the corruptibility of the minority leading to conflict, the idea of the corruptibility of the majority. From this point of view once a larger society forms it will demand (and reward) leadership by a minority, but the general body of the society is likely to form a mass with a weak collective mind, no memory of the past, weak sense of the future, little sense of responsibility and always seeking maximum reward for the least effort. Leaders are forced to try to manage entropic tendencies of the mass at the same time as meeting its demands for gratification.

    , @Coconuts
    @Mikel


    You are probably right but the fact that there seems to be a positive correlation between the development of a country and the willingness of its inhabitants to kill or die for beliefs may be telling us something perhaps positive about human nature too.
     
    The strange thing about the current situation in some of the most developed countries is that while people are reluctant to kill or die for anything, they are also weirdly reluctant to have children, despite conditions for it being more favourable than ever in history, in theory. (Even with modern contraception etc. it is surprising more couples don't form and manage 2). One reason this is happening is maybe addressed in the Drieu La Rochelle quote I posted earlier and is linked to risk taking. There might also be some explanation for what seem to be deteriorating relations between the sexes in younger generations there.

    But less people willing to go to war should lead to less wars, all else being equal. In fact, how much do even professional soldiers fight for beliefs these days? I don’t think that most of them would go to war as unpaid volunteers so not much, probably.
     
    This is true and given the nature of modern warfare it is understandable. It's hard to say how far people used to fight for beliefs and how far it was for reasons like protecting resources and families, honour and social standing, the latter two being linked to the first two. Beliefs may be hard to disentangle from these other motivations.

    I think before industrial times, when infant mortality was 50%, it could either go higher if you were poor, or be lower if you were wealthier and had more resources. There would always be some incentive there for people to try different means of gathering more resources and gaining social status (wives would be grateful if fewer of their children died) if opportunities arose. Successful fighters and warriors probably always boosted their chances with women, which would be another similar motivation.

    Replies: @Barbarossa

  554. @silviosilver
    @Mikel

    Thank you for replying, and for presumably doing so honestly (since it's doubtful in the extreme someone, in today's world, would lie to make himself sound more 'racist' or selfish).


    But as Adam Smith (the author of this hypothetical) explained
     
    Actually, Adam Smith's hypothetical referred to the entirety of China being swallowed up by an earthquake, implying many times more than a million deaths. I take it that was a step too far you, so you trimmed it down to something more palatable. And that's fine - it's your conscience you have to live with.

    It's not a step too far for me though. In the case of China, I actually would be quite disturbed at the loss. I was a China admirer as a kid, and still think very highly of them, although geopolitical concerns tend to dominate my opinion at present. But the thought that all that would be gone, vanished, never to be seen again, that's quite disturbing.

    In contrast, and as I've said on this site before (which anyone can check to see I'm not just making this up now to 'compete' with you in terms of selfishness), if there were some hitherto unknown 'evolutionary timing' mechanism that caused everybody of majority African ancestry to drop dead this instant, the only tears of joy that providential event would elicit from me are tears of unrestrained joy.

    I don't think that's 'evil.' I didn't cause their extinction. I'm not taking pleasure in their suffering, because they're not suffering - they're, poof, gone. Imagine the relief knowing there are now parts of town you formerly wouldn't have dared set foot in which you can now stroll through freely. Imagine the first time you try it, cautiously inching forward, nervously looking about you, wondering "can it really be true?", and then the wave of relief that washes over you as you realize that, "why, it is, it is true - free! free at last!" haha. Imagine the relief knowing your ancestral continent is not going to be submerged under an avalanche of monkeyshit. Frankly, if that is 'evil', then I don't want to be 'good'; but more realistically, anyone who is not a teenage girl should, with a little thought, be able to understand that indifference, while it may form a component of evil, cannot be equated with evil.

    Replies: @AnonfromTN

    Your first statement about honesty reminds me of Russian joke
    A Jew arrives to Germany, comes up to a first guy and asks
    – What do you think about Jews?
    The guy answers
    – Jews are a wonderful nation with many talented people…
    The Jew comes to another guy and asks
    – What do you think about Jews?
    The guy answers
    -Jews are a great nation and we Germans are guilty of persecuting them…
    The Jew comes up to a third guy
    -What do you think about Jews?
    The guy answers
    – My views are not typical, but I don’t like Jews
    The Jew says
    – Could you please look after my suitcase for a while?
    – Why me?
    – You are an honest person

  555. Elon Musk is not MAGA.

    However, his Libertarian pummeling of ‘authoritarian liberalism’ is refreshing nonetheless. (1)

    LET ME JUST GET OUT AHEAD OF THE STORY AND SAY THAT ELON MUSK DID NOT COMMIT SUICIDE:

    It’s Elon Musk’s Twitter now and his reply to Hillary Clinton … well … pop that popcorn.

     

     

    The nutter who attacked Pelosi was a BLM, Leftoid, hate rager. Trying to spin it as QAnon is a non-starter, but they are so desperate they are trying anyway.

    PEACE 😇
    ___________

    (1) https://instapundit.com/551015/

  556. @Mikel
    @Coconuts


    Understanding of evolution and human evolution specifically raises questions about how plausible the advent of this universal state of pacification is. Possibly it is not even a possibility given the kind of animal humans are.
     
    You are probably right but the fact that there seems to be a positive correlation between the development of a country and the willingness of its inhabitants to kill or die for beliefs may be telling us something perhaps positive about human nature too.

    Granted, these people don't much care when the professional armies of their countries do engage in pointless wars far away and may even be supportive of them, given an adequate informative conditioning (or for the simple reason of supporting their national team, so to speak). But less people willing to go to war should lead to less wars, all else being equal. In fact, how much do even professional soldiers fight for beliefs these days? I don't think that most of them would go to war as unpaid volunteers so not much, probably.

    Another important point raised by Beckow is that historically it has been a minority at the top who have decided to start wars, especially the most ideological ones. The masses have always been brainwashed and/or directly forced to take part in the hostilities. Past the tribal state, most people probably prefer to lead peaceful lives rather than to fight enemies. Beckow then goes on a contradictory tangent with the strange claim that the Russians just had no choice but to engage in the wholesale killing of Russophones that they're now carrying out in Eastern Ukraine but that is another matter.

    Replies: @sudden death, @Beckow, @Coconuts, @Coconuts

    Past the tribal state, most people probably prefer to lead peaceful lives rather than to fight enemies.

    Quite doubtful, because it might not be that universal feeling at all, Orwell’s notes about this have not aged, sound like could be written yesterday (my own bolding below):

    Also he has grasped the falsity of the hedonistic attitude to life. Nearly all western thought since the last war, certainly all ‘progressive’ thought, has assumed tacitly that human beings desire nothing beyond ease, security and avoidance of pain. In such a view of life there is no room, for instance, for patriotism and the military virtues. The Socialist who finds his children playing with soldiers is usually upset, but he is never able to think of a substitute for the tin soldiers; tin pacifists somehow won’t do. Hitler, because in his own joyless mind he feels it with exceptional strength, knows that human beings don’t only want comfort, safety, short working-hours, hygiene, birth-control and, in general, common sense; they also, at least intermittently, want struggle and self-sacrifice, not to mention drums, flags and loyalty-parades. However they may be as economic theories, Fascism and Nazism are psychologically far sounder than any hedonistic conception of life. The same is probably true of Stalin’s militarised version of Socialism. All three of the great dictators have enhanced their power by imposing intolerable burdens on their peoples. Whereas Socialism, and even capitalism in a more grudging way, have said to people ‘I offer you a good time,’ Hitler has said to them ‘I offer you struggle, danger and death,’ and as a result a whole nation flings itself at his feet. Perhaps later on they will get sick of it and change their minds, as at the end of the last war. After a few years of slaughter and starvation ‘Greatest happiness of the greatest number’ is a good slogan, but at this moment ‘Better an end with horror than a horror without end’ is a winner. Now that we are fighting against the man who coined it, we ought not to underrate its emotional appeal.”

    https://bookmarks.reviews/george-orwells-1940-review-of-mein-kampf/

    • Replies: @Mikel
    @sudden death


    human beings don’t only want comfort, safety, short working-hours, hygiene, birth-control and, in general, common sense; they also, at least intermittently, want struggle and self-sacrifice
     
    True (in some cases, not as a general rule) but those human needs can be perfectly satisfied by activities that have nothing to do with slaughtering other humans.

    Besides, in the West (including a good part of EE, I think) we've evolved well past Orwell's times. AP recently claimed that the Spaniards would have also killed thousands of civilians in the Basque Country or Catalonia if confronted with an armed insurrection similar to the one in Donbass. But no, they wouldn't. In the 30s and 40s they certainly wouldn't have hesitated. In fact, that's what they did with Orwell as a direct witness. But these days they're a different kind of people. The Catalans didn't get their independence because they weren't willing to sacrifice much for it themselves. There were always voices in Madrid asking not to go too far or even directly to let the "ungrateful" Catalans (and Basques) go once for all. Eventually the new left-wing government in Spain pardoned all sentenced Catalan authorities.

    We may all revert to a mid-20th century mentality, nothing is written, but the trend has not been going in that direction after the WWII shock and the global economic development. Even countries at the bottom of the development ladder, like India and Pakistan, were recently able to contain a flare up and proceed to a civilized exchange of prisoners.
  557. @Mikel
    @Coconuts


    Understanding of evolution and human evolution specifically raises questions about how plausible the advent of this universal state of pacification is. Possibly it is not even a possibility given the kind of animal humans are.
     
    You are probably right but the fact that there seems to be a positive correlation between the development of a country and the willingness of its inhabitants to kill or die for beliefs may be telling us something perhaps positive about human nature too.

    Granted, these people don't much care when the professional armies of their countries do engage in pointless wars far away and may even be supportive of them, given an adequate informative conditioning (or for the simple reason of supporting their national team, so to speak). But less people willing to go to war should lead to less wars, all else being equal. In fact, how much do even professional soldiers fight for beliefs these days? I don't think that most of them would go to war as unpaid volunteers so not much, probably.

    Another important point raised by Beckow is that historically it has been a minority at the top who have decided to start wars, especially the most ideological ones. The masses have always been brainwashed and/or directly forced to take part in the hostilities. Past the tribal state, most people probably prefer to lead peaceful lives rather than to fight enemies. Beckow then goes on a contradictory tangent with the strange claim that the Russians just had no choice but to engage in the wholesale killing of Russophones that they're now carrying out in Eastern Ukraine but that is another matter.

    Replies: @sudden death, @Beckow, @Coconuts, @Coconuts

    ..strange claim that the Russians just had no choice but to engage in the wholesale killing of Russophones that they’re now carrying out in Eastern Ukraine

    The killing is part of all wars. Whether they are Russo-phones or not, in a war people in the middle die. It is very unlikely it was planned or is intentional, it simply happens in wars. I think in the West they call it ‘collateral damage’.

    I have asked many times, what was the better choice for Russia? I have never heard a coherent answer. Doing nothing was not an option – Ukraine in Nato and Russian-free is not an option for them. Waiting? Pleading with loser puppets in Germany-France? What exactly is the better choice you think they had?

    • Agree: Mikhail
    • Replies: @Mikel
    @Beckow


    I have asked many times, what was the better choice for Russia? I have never heard a coherent answer.
     
    That's in fact a very easy question to answer. Russia had the incomparably better choice of continuing to develop economically, trying to improve relations with everybody and maintain or enlarge the formidable security umbrella that it already had, with the largest nuclear arsenal in the world.

    Few countries could feel as secure of not being attacked by anyone as Russia, before they started this war. Now they are actually being attacked by Ukraine on their territory with the help of the West. Their security situation has worsened catastrophically because of the war.

    You have correctly pointed out in the past that Ukraine should learn to live with the fact that it will always live beside a much larger and powerful neighbor. But Russia should also learn to live with the no less obvious fact that it is surrounded by neighbors that for historical reasons, temperament or whatever have hostile attitudes towards Russia. In the long run, a peaceful and prosperous Russia concentrated on its own development would make those attitudes all but vanish, as other formerly bellicose countries have done.

    Replies: @Beckow

  558. @sudden death
    @Mikel


    Past the tribal state, most people probably prefer to lead peaceful lives rather than to fight enemies.
     
    Quite doubtful, because it might not be that universal feeling at all, Orwell's notes about this have not aged, sound like could be written yesterday (my own bolding below):

    Also he has grasped the falsity of the hedonistic attitude to life. Nearly all western thought since the last war, certainly all ‘progressive’ thought, has assumed tacitly that human beings desire nothing beyond ease, security and avoidance of pain. In such a view of life there is no room, for instance, for patriotism and the military virtues. The Socialist who finds his children playing with soldiers is usually upset, but he is never able to think of a substitute for the tin soldiers; tin pacifists somehow won’t do. Hitler, because in his own joyless mind he feels it with exceptional strength, knows that human beings don’t only want comfort, safety, short working-hours, hygiene, birth-control and, in general, common sense; they also, at least intermittently, want struggle and self-sacrifice, not to mention drums, flags and loyalty-parades. However they may be as economic theories, Fascism and Nazism are psychologically far sounder than any hedonistic conception of life. The same is probably true of Stalin’s militarised version of Socialism. All three of the great dictators have enhanced their power by imposing intolerable burdens on their peoples. Whereas Socialism, and even capitalism in a more grudging way, have said to people ‘I offer you a good time,’ Hitler has said to them ‘I offer you struggle, danger and death,’ and as a result a whole nation flings itself at his feet. Perhaps later on they will get sick of it and change their minds, as at the end of the last war. After a few years of slaughter and starvation ‘Greatest happiness of the greatest number’ is a good slogan, but at this moment ‘Better an end with horror than a horror without end’ is a winner. Now that we are fighting against the man who coined it, we ought not to underrate its emotional appeal.”
     
    https://bookmarks.reviews/george-orwells-1940-review-of-mein-kampf/

    Replies: @Mikel

    human beings don’t only want comfort, safety, short working-hours, hygiene, birth-control and, in general, common sense; they also, at least intermittently, want struggle and self-sacrifice

    True (in some cases, not as a general rule) but those human needs can be perfectly satisfied by activities that have nothing to do with slaughtering other humans.

    Besides, in the West (including a good part of EE, I think) we’ve evolved well past Orwell’s times. AP recently claimed that the Spaniards would have also killed thousands of civilians in the Basque Country or Catalonia if confronted with an armed insurrection similar to the one in Donbass. But no, they wouldn’t. In the 30s and 40s they certainly wouldn’t have hesitated. In fact, that’s what they did with Orwell as a direct witness. But these days they’re a different kind of people. The Catalans didn’t get their independence because they weren’t willing to sacrifice much for it themselves. There were always voices in Madrid asking not to go too far or even directly to let the “ungrateful” Catalans (and Basques) go once for all. Eventually the new left-wing government in Spain pardoned all sentenced Catalan authorities.

    We may all revert to a mid-20th century mentality, nothing is written, but the trend has not been going in that direction after the WWII shock and the global economic development. Even countries at the bottom of the development ladder, like India and Pakistan, were recently able to contain a flare up and proceed to a civilized exchange of prisoners.

  559. @Mr. Hack
    @QCIC

    As I follow the economic news regarding all the major parts of the world, it's no foolish thing to follow this type of news within Russia iteself, especially during war time. What made the paper that Vladislav Inozemtsev wrote so very prescient is that he's ostensibly an insider, that's spent many years at the top as a serious Russian economist. It's too bad that nobody here bothered to watch the video clip that I included - could have been the start of an interesting mini thread here. Instead we end up getting the same old, same old. I don't get it, I know that many of the readers of this blog have a keen interest in economics?...

    Replies: @QCIC

    I watched the video before commenting. Do you have a link to an English translation of the paper? Based on a quick glance at some of his online articles I think Inozemtsev has long had an anti-Kremlin stance so his views are consistent with that. Is he one of the so-called Atlanticists?

    His ability to publish what was summarized in the video suggests the Russian press is more free than some commenters would have us believe 🙂

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @QCIC

    I came across the video quite accidentally on YouTube. I haven't actually read the paper in any language, but thought that the video did a good job of summarising and including quotes from the paper.


    His ability to publish what was summarized in the video suggests the Russian press is more free than some commenters would have us believe 🙂
     
    I'd have to agree with you. As I originally pointed out:

    I actually can’t believe that his report (or Inozemtsev himself) wasn’t buried somewhere.

     

    I understand that things come hard and fast at this blogsite, so I'm going to reprint the YouTube clip to see if anybody else here knows anything about Inozemtsev:

    https://youtu.be/QMRn7jx7JqA

    Replies: @Philip Owen

  560. Why is the counter revolution in Iran so UN under covered?

    The IRGC leadership keeps trying to turn up pressure and it is backfiring spectacularly: (1)

    The Commander of Iran’s elite Revolutionary Guards Corps, Hossein Salami, warned protesters on Saturday, “Today is the last day of the riots. Do not come to the streets again.”

    Meanwhile, Reuters reports that, despite the warning, confrontations between police and protesters continued throughout the country as even the youngest girls are now defying the hijab law.

    It looks like even the most zealous Iranian troops will not fire on their own people.

    Other efforts where the IRGC has been aggressive towards civilians have failed badly [MORE].

    Last night security forces attacked more than 20 universities across Iran. They kidnapped students to prevent them from protesting. Here is the result; this morning, incredible turnout in the university of Zanjan.

    This is the beginning of the and, we won’t give up”

    #MahsaAmini

    Attempts to misrepresent this 100% native movement as ‘foreign interference’ has also flopped.

    What should we expect in the next few days? Iranian Elites escaping the country with suitcases full of cash?

    Anyone who might be scapegoated by sociopath Khamenei needs to beat feet now, before it is too late.

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/rick-moran/2022/10/30/irans-revolutionary-guards-commander-says-saturday-is-the-last-day-of-protests-n1641189

    [MORE]

  561. @AP
    @Beckow

    You lie about me as you lie about everything else.

    And there is an element of projection in your lies; you are the semi-educated product of socialist schools, repeating the anti-Christian and anti-Catholic myths that were stuffed into your simple mind by your masters. He schools in the USA followed the British-Protestant tradition and probably had similar myths about the Holy Inquisition.


    The concept of Purgatory was gradually invented only in the 13.-14. centuries, it is a marginal part of the catholic faith
     
    We Eastern Catholics and the Orthodox don’t talk about Purgatory.

    But numerous devout Roman Catholics find meaning in their physical suffering by the idea that suffering in this world will reduce their time in purgatory. I heard this several times when I had worked in a setting with terminally patients, it was not a marginal idea.

    Replies: @Beckow, @Barbarossa

    …numerous devout Roman Catholics find meaning in their physical suffering by the idea that suffering in this world will reduce their time in purgatory.

    Well, to each his own, but in the context we are discussing it means nothing. You can’t apply this voluntary choice to find meaning in suffering to the numerous victims of the Catholic Church. Millions of people who were over the centuries burnt to death, tortured, deprived of limbs, imprisoned – they didn’t find the suffering enriching and didn’t see it as a nice shortcut through Purgatory to get to Heaven sooner.

    It goes against human biology – they were tortured and killed by the Catholic Church that you so desperately defend. You spend all your time downplaying the horrible past of the Church, Habsburgs and assorted other aristocrats and maniacs, like the current Nazi revivalists in Galicia – but your also massively exaggerate what was a reaction to these crimes by the other side, call them ‘left’, working class, regular people, or socialists. There was a lot to atone for – you not seeing it is either result of a really bad education, or you pretend and like to side with the bloody feudal satanism of our European past.

    • Agree: sher singh
  562. @Bashibuzuk
    @Beckow

    I agree with what you wrote.

    A minor observation, I also think we have reached an inflection point, but IMO we have passed past this stage. It was perhaps a couple of years, decades or even generations ago. We did not see it because we do not see the forest for the trees, we are too engaged in our daily lives to notice and the propaganda is too pervasive, especially through advertising and certainly even more so since the social networking made its appearance some 20 years ago. The elites known full well that we are past the apex, that we are going downhill. They are actually in damage control, but some of them also seem tempted to go the full controlled demolition way. I think most genetic lineages/bloodlines in the general populace won't make it past the bottleneck. I hope that I am wrong though.


    Like we are killing each others’ gods forgetting that we are the ones who created them.
     
    Before erasing someone from history entirely, their gods must be killed. Yes, at the end of Western Roman Empire it was Goths and other barbarians fighting against each other for the control of the decaying Latin civilization. And even among the Attila's Huns that came plundering, it was Eastern Goths that probably formed an important proportion in the officers' ranks.

    The difference among the Latin and Attila's (or King Etzel's as the Germans called him) Goths, might have been that the ones who stayed among the barbarians kept their native mythology longer than the ones who joined the decadent and crumbling civilization. Later on, it was their barbarian social organization that allowed them to introduce feudal relations between the monarchs and their elite subjects. It was on these somewhat more archaic social norms that the medieval West was built during the Dark Ages. And their gods and heroes survived through their myths and sagas until the day they helped nourishing German Romanticism and the rebirth of the Germanic nation.

    If we find a way to carry our myths, heroes and gods through the coming population bottleneck, then a rebirth is possible in some future days. Otherwise we will be erased for good, with only the victorious elites capable of knowing that our world has one day existed.

    We need sound and enduring metaphysics and myths. Otherwise we will end up living and dying like animals do. And become forgotten as dead animals are.

    Replies: @Beckow

    ….find a way to carry our myths, heroes and gods through the coming population bottleneck, then a rebirth is possible in some future days

    There are a lot of people living today, so there is hope. The coming bottleneck – I agree – will purge a lot from the society – too many have decided to die out and there is nothing that can be done about it. My main hope is that the past (myths, gods…) will be preserved in the mixed society, that enough of our mixture will survive in the coming melange.

    But this is self-inflicted: the combination of biological stupidity and outright laziness is deadly. Dead-enders march…and they are so f…ing happy as they rush towards oblivion. But what can be done? It happened before: Rome went from 1 million plus to a small 10k city, many others did too. Something in the human psyche kicks in and biology stops. The continuing biology of any group is a prerequisite for the other stuff about that group to survive.

    • Agree: Bashibuzuk
  563. @Sean
    @Mikhail

    At the begining of the war, Magregor started saying what everyone else was, but he is still saying it even though the US is proving a very, very much greater level of support for Ukraine than anyone originally expected. I think although he is a corrective to US prppaganda to a certain extent, Macgregor has began to delude himself; I certainly think his cautious credence given to Russian claims shows he is being duped and duping himself into believing the Russian overestimation of Britain's clandestine capability, ruthlessness, and daring. The UK public have an insatiable appetite for wild stories about the SAS, and the Daily Mail ECT are happy to oblige.

    Here is some reality therapy. Why would Ukraine need anyone from the British Army to blow something up? The SAS have training in explosives demolition, but for a bridge as big as Kerch they would need to get opinion from specialists in relevant fields. The SAS are in Ukraine, but mainly as glorified bodyguards. Ukraine has no civil and or military engineers?; course they have, some of whom have been over the bridge. Anyway, Britain has not got the balls for something like that--or the pipeline. Macgregor takes the possibility of both being the Brits seriously.


    The more fool the Russians for believing in Minsk, because they have lost all the advantages they had over Ukraine in 2015. Now there is an open ended American commitment to Ukraine. Meanwhile, house prices in Kiev where Russians arrived in parade Uniforms and the FSB commander tried to pick out a beautiful apartment overlooking the River for himself, are continuing to rise. the manpower and strategic space of Ukraine allied to US advanced weapons and endless supply means war without end. The style of Ukrainian soldiering in this phase of the war is less 'gets angry when you miss him' Joe Frazier, and more Ali. Ceasing to threaten Kiev was a major mistake. Almost as bad as not mobilising in March

    Russians arms's quality is lowering because RusFed science has not kept up; their academics are less competitive with each other and have less time for practical innovation in engineering through workload and being 'lost in math'.


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q2DNcBUDoaE
    "[Physicist turned Defence Secretary Ash] Carter kicked off a host of projects to bring in civilian tech-sector best practices, like bug bounties. [...] This legacy of Carter’s ---s by investing in cutting-edge technology — especially tech in which he saw potential for rapid advances that could tilt the balance of power towards the US. Long-range, precision-guided weapons were one big part of that. But so were artificial intelligence, robotics, and unmanned vehicles, as demonstrated by his gleeful robo-boat demonstration back in 2016; since then, there’s even been an SM-6 launch off an unmanned vessel. "

    Soviet system theoreticians are losing ground to the US practical emphasis because there is big money in defence in US universities. If Putin prioritises winning in Ukraine, defeating him will entail killing approaching 100,000 Russian troops. Russia is more about mass effect than advanced tech. They are firing off silly drones scores at the time instead. Quality over quantity is the US way. and they have not even sent Ukraine the Vietnam era HAWK system yet let alone its successor missile defense system PATRIOT. Fourteen HIMARS launchers blunted the Russian offensive, if they got going again Ukraine will be given the much heavier and longer range Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS), and the Russian army is nothing without its artillery logistics.

    Replies: @Mikhail

    At the begining of the war, Magregor started saying what everyone else was, but he is still saying it even though the US is proving a very, very much greater level of support for Ukraine than anyone originally expected. I think although he is a corrective to US prppaganda to a certain extent, Macgregor has began to delude himself; I certainly think his cautious credence given to Russian claims shows he is being duped and duping himself into believing the Russian overestimation of Britain’s clandestine capability, ruthlessness, and daring. The UK public have an insatiable appetite for wild stories about the SAS, and the Daily Mail ECT are happy to oblige.

    Macgregor still not as off the wall as Hodges. The latter believing among other things that Crimea will fall in the next 12 months.

    The more fool the Russians for believing in Minsk, because they have lost all the advantages they had over Ukraine in 2015. Now there is an open ended American commitment to Ukraine. Meanwhile, house prices in Kiev where Russians arrived in parade Uniforms and the FSB commander tried to pick out a beautiful apartment overlooking the River for himself, are continuing to rise. the manpower and strategic space of Ukraine allied to US advanced weapons and endless supply means war without end. The style of Ukrainian soldiering in this phase of the war is less ‘gets angry when you miss him’ Joe Frazier, and more Ali. Ceasing to threaten Kiev was a major mistake. Almost as bad as not mobilising in March

    Russians arms’s quality is lowering because RusFed science has not kept up; their academics are less competitive with each other and have less time for practical innovation in engineering through workload and being ‘lost in math’.

    In 2015, Russia wasn’t as strong, in addition to wanting to be sure that (the newly reunified with Russia) Crimea would be secure. Hind sight on the initial and ongoing manner of the SMO. USSR made gross mistakes about Finland and still prevailed. The same likely to happen in this current situation.

    Kiev regime is very much militarily wasted – much more so than Russia. By 1917, Russia was much better militarily equipped than in 1914. Prolonged mass losses do have a way of changing the motivation to fight on.

    US and other Western nations are very much challenged in arms production, while lacking in the development of hypersonic weapons.

    Situations like this won’t help the cause to fight Russia to the last Ukrainian:

    https://www.rt.com/news/565616-finland-ukraine-weapons-gangs/

    • Replies: @Sean
    @Mikhail


    Macgregor still not as off the wall as Hodges
     
    Hodges said before the invasion that the Russians would be unable to take Kiev, and he was right. Just like Mearshiemer was about Russia being fated to attack Ukraine unless it had a nuclear deterent .

    In 2015, Russia wasn’t as strong
     
    They had the psychological momentum. The Ukrainian officers were not leading effectively in 2015; that has changed. In his TedX talk of six years ago, Hodges says Lt. Eric Wood (who fought to the death during the Battle of the Bulge on his own initiative ) and Joshua Chamberlain epitomised what is expected of an officer, and that kind of ethos was inculcated into the Ukrainan armed forces. The standing orders were to fight and not retreat unless authorised to do so. There is a lot more surveillance of commanders and other officials by the very numerous Ukrainian security police too. Putin wanted to reprise his Crimea production as if Ukraine had not taken remedial measures to ensure there could be not repitition. As John Gray says Putin is not a military man https://youtu.be/uOYW82PQjzQ?t=1547

    Replies: @Mikhail

  564. @Mr. Hack
    @Philip Owen


    The key item of wear is of course the battery.
     
    Do you know whether the lifespan of batteries has gone up substantially over say the last 10 years or not? For obvious reasons, I find the idea of having to purchase some kind of monthly insurance to replace a battery ahead of time a financial hassle that I don't want to have any part of . I would think that many current owners of such vehicles probably dump these cars just before the batteries die off. I wonder how this is handled in the secondary used car market? The distributorships must be able to replace the batteries in a costly manner and keep the retail prices down?...

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Barbarossa, @Philip Owen

    Lifetime isn’t best measured in years which is why you will see claims of 10-20 years, a wide spread. You will also see claims of 100,000 to 200,000 miles. End of life is 70% of capacity. By this time, ability to cope with extreme temperatures, especially cold, will be in decline as will range and acceleration. The warranties offered are more like 8 years and 100,000 miles. Rapid acceleration, driving quickly will deteriorate the battery. Charging cycles are the key measure of battery life. These are measured in hundreds of cycles. Exactly how many is a closely guarded secret for each manufacturer. I am not optimistic of huge strides in new battery capability. Cost is another thing.

    Many new battery companies and lithium mines are being launched. Competition should start reducing the price over the next 8 years. There is a catch. Raw materials will be in short supply and until large new mines for copper, manganese (mostly Ukraine and Georgia by the way), and graphite are competeing with each other, the miners will control the value chain.

    My 18 year Ford Mondeo 2.4 l diesel has never run better with 150,000 on the clock. 48.5 miles per UK gallon in real use (58.2/US – it’s already too late at night to compute l/100km). It is good for 240,000 miles if I am careful with the bodywork and corrosion management. My brother’s Kia hybrid has almost zero fuel costs with his use patterns but requires the maintenance of an internal combustion engine and the battery replacement of an electric vehicle at about 100,000 miles. As a sometime cofounder of Friends of the Earth in the UK I think hanging on to my diesel until it dies is the greenest option. I walk or cycle locally. I use the car for long trips I can’t do by train. Long trips with a warm engine reduce the particle emission problem to insignificance. Replacing the vehicle will do more harm.

    Opinions may vary.

    • Replies: @Philip Owen
    @Philip Owen

    Too late to edit. British Volt, an independent battery manufacturer claims they will offer 1500 - 2000 recharge cycles. They don't hide their figures because cycle life is their competitive distinction over captive manfacturers. This is probably state of the art and several times better than current production.

  565. @Philip Owen
    @Mr. Hack

    Lifetime isn't best measured in years which is why you will see claims of 10-20 years, a wide spread. You will also see claims of 100,000 to 200,000 miles. End of life is 70% of capacity. By this time, ability to cope with extreme temperatures, especially cold, will be in decline as will range and acceleration. The warranties offered are more like 8 years and 100,000 miles. Rapid acceleration, driving quickly will deteriorate the battery. Charging cycles are the key measure of battery life. These are measured in hundreds of cycles. Exactly how many is a closely guarded secret for each manufacturer. I am not optimistic of huge strides in new battery capability. Cost is another thing.

    Many new battery companies and lithium mines are being launched. Competition should start reducing the price over the next 8 years. There is a catch. Raw materials will be in short supply and until large new mines for copper, manganese (mostly Ukraine and Georgia by the way), and graphite are competeing with each other, the miners will control the value chain.

    My 18 year Ford Mondeo 2.4 l diesel has never run better with 150,000 on the clock. 48.5 miles per UK gallon in real use (58.2/US - it's already too late at night to compute l/100km). It is good for 240,000 miles if I am careful with the bodywork and corrosion management. My brother's Kia hybrid has almost zero fuel costs with his use patterns but requires the maintenance of an internal combustion engine and the battery replacement of an electric vehicle at about 100,000 miles. As a sometime cofounder of Friends of the Earth in the UK I think hanging on to my diesel until it dies is the greenest option. I walk or cycle locally. I use the car for long trips I can't do by train. Long trips with a warm engine reduce the particle emission problem to insignificance. Replacing the vehicle will do more harm.

    Opinions may vary.

    Replies: @Philip Owen

    Too late to edit. British Volt, an independent battery manufacturer claims they will offer 1500 – 2000 recharge cycles. They don’t hide their figures because cycle life is their competitive distinction over captive manfacturers. This is probably state of the art and several times better than current production.

    • Thanks: Mr. Hack, Bashibuzuk
  566. @AP
    @Dmitry


    Your views seem more like something Aztec or belief in rain gods
     
    Aztec demons demanded mass human sacrifice of innocents.

    Terrible things happen to communities because they have collectively engaged in sin.

    How are these similar?

    Medieval Christians explained the Mongol invasion as a divine punishment for sins.

    So, you would believe the area which experiences this property boom and asset increase are therefore becoming further from entering the Kingdom of Heaven, in the New Testament
     
    I do not belong to a Protestant sect that believes the Bible is more important than the Church. One can quote passages to support all kinds of claims but the Church has different conclusions:

    https://www.goarch.org/-/orthodox-christian-wealth-and-stewardship

    Putin and polls consistently show that Russians support the war.

    And the polls in Cuba, will show Cuba has the best healthcare system in the world
     
    Do Cubans think so? Because most Russians do like Putin and do support the war. This support has eroded only because Russians are experiencing mass mobilization. This means that most Russians didn’t mind invading Ukraine and slaughtering its people but they mind getting killed themselves.

    Putin.. are popular among Russians

    You were promoting him to us
     
    Until he started the invasion and mass killing of Ukrainians. Russians still like him though.

    “is being most devastated by”

    Being most devastated, suffering and persecuted is not indicator of unrighteousness, in the New Testament teaching

     

    It suggests a need to suffer in order to expunge one’s sins. A community that has fallen into sin is in greater need to “carry a cross” than one that has not. It is an opportunity for redemption.

    When the Holy Inquisition burned heretics it was for the purpose of their salvation.

    Religious Catholics who suffer chronic pain will often find meaning in their experience by viewing it as an opportunity to pay for their sins and thereby reduce their stay in purgatory. This does not necessarily mean that they were bad people personally. We are mortal and will die as a consequence of the original sin.

    Replies: @silviosilver, @Dmitry

    Until he started the invasion

    You said ordinary Russians are responsible for the invasion of Ukraine and sin because they voted for Putin and even those who do not vote for Putin must be somehow responsible.

    But you have been in this forum promoting Putin to Russians. This is despite being American, without the information control and implications that are for Russians in relation to the government.

    From your logic, you are more responsible for the invasion of Ukraine, than any of us Russians who criticized your views. I mean the thread is only year ago. https://www.unz.com/akarlin/russias-nationalist-turn/#comment-4928594

    Cubans think so?

    If you are managed by propaganda, given years of fake data from all directions and have zero control about the outcome either way.

    Terrible things happen to communities because they have collectively engaged in sin.

    How are these similar?

    Aztecs and (more primitive) pagan peoples had believed that material goods like harvests are attained or not, if god is happy or sad about the people.

    This is the theology you are promoting, it is like Aztecs, but also many ancient peoples. Hinduism of course is much more sophisticated than this.

    Belief in the raingods has been common in Iron Age even in the Fertile Crescent. Part of this was still believed by the Ancient Israelites in the time of Solomon, although there is more sophisticated teaching by the Divided Kingdom, there the remainder’s in Job’s friends, some of the disciples Jesus has to correct.

    It is opposite of New Testament teaching, of course.

    can quote passages to support all kinds of claims

    Every time I discuss the Bible with you, it seems to me, you must never have read the book, neither subsequent religion’s literature or history. You often promote reverse of most of the teachings of the New Testament. But at least I think there are probably people here like Coconuts and Bashibuzuk who read the bible so hopefully this discussion will not be too lost.

    the Church has different conclusions:

    What church?

    For example, embrace of poverty is central in Catholic teaching. You don’t know the vow of poverty? You know anything of Carmelites, Hospitallers, Jesuits, Dominicans, Franciscans, Augustinians? You read any Catholic writers like Thomas a Kempis or Ignatius of Loyola?

    the Church has different conclusions:

    Not about poverty.

    By the way, Catholic Church has said recently that helping Syrian refugees is the most important social topic of our time. I’ve been in Catholic services and they ask you for the money to help refugees at the final.

    Russian Orthodox Church has said that “special military operation” (i.e. invasion of Ukraine) is a holy mission that can remove your sins if you join.

    A community that has fallen into sin is in greater need to “carry a cross”

    Not this as they constantly write, the Christians are the most persecuted and suffering community “in this world”, although not in the world to come.

    need to suffer in order to expunge one’s sins

    In the New Testament, suffering in this world is not related to sins, as not just constantly Jesus says (but also the later writers).
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=John+9:1-4

    • Replies: @Bashibuzuk
    @Dmitry


    In the New Testament, suffering in this world is not related to sins, as not just constantly Jesus says (but also the later writers).
     
    Early Christians have probably believed in Guilgul haNeshamot as some Jewish sects still do today, especially among the Kabbalists.

    Many Gospel passages might be interpreted this way and of course the Gnostics seem to have nearly unanimously held rebirth to be true.

    The possibility for the mindstream to attain gradual purification through the cycles of existence is the only reasonable answer to the problem of suffering.

    There's no other compelling Theodicy.

    I have looked a lot and found no other justification for suffering.

    Most modern Abrahamic teachings are sub-par at explaining human suffering and the origin of our imperfections that are the main true source of our suffering either individual or communal.

    They basically blasphemously ascribe the imperfections in Creation to a most perfect God.

    This is of course wrong and should never be accepted.

    God is perfectly good that is why he has given us a Creation in which we might eventually come ourselves to a perfect goodness. It would of course take a long time from humans' point of view, but there is no time for God.

    https://youtu.be/pjPkfuoTvBI

    https://youtu.be/NOSp8WmbGeE

    This is of course quite similar to Hinduism and even Buddhism to some degree.

    And Rav. Daniel is such a humble and straightforward man.

    🙂

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @S, @Barbarossa, @Dmitry, @silviosilver

  567. Bashibuzuk says:
    @Dmitry
    @AP


    Until he started the invasion
     
    You said ordinary Russians are responsible for the invasion of Ukraine and sin because they voted for Putin and even those who do not vote for Putin must be somehow responsible.

    But you have been in this forum promoting Putin to Russians. This is despite being American, without the information control and implications that are for Russians in relation to the government.

    From your logic, you are more responsible for the invasion of Ukraine, than any of us Russians who criticized your views. I mean the thread is only year ago. https://www.unz.com/akarlin/russias-nationalist-turn/#comment-4928594


    Cubans think so?

     

    If you are managed by propaganda, given years of fake data from all directions and have zero control about the outcome either way.


    Terrible things happen to communities because they have collectively engaged in sin.

    How are these similar?
     

    Aztecs and (more primitive) pagan peoples had believed that material goods like harvests are attained or not, if god is happy or sad about the people.

    This is the theology you are promoting, it is like Aztecs, but also many ancient peoples. Hinduism of course is much more sophisticated than this.

    Belief in the raingods has been common in Iron Age even in the Fertile Crescent. Part of this was still believed by the Ancient Israelites in the time of Solomon, although there is more sophisticated teaching by the Divided Kingdom, there the remainder's in Job's friends, some of the disciples Jesus has to correct.

    It is opposite of New Testament teaching, of course.


    can quote passages to support all kinds of claims

     

    Every time I discuss the Bible with you, it seems to me, you must never have read the book, neither subsequent religion's literature or history. You often promote reverse of most of the teachings of the New Testament. But at least I think there are probably people here like Coconuts and Bashibuzuk who read the bible so hopefully this discussion will not be too lost.

    the Church has different conclusions:

     

    What church?

    For example, embrace of poverty is central in Catholic teaching. You don't know the vow of poverty? You know anything of Carmelites, Hospitallers, Jesuits, Dominicans, Franciscans, Augustinians? You read any Catholic writers like Thomas a Kempis or Ignatius of Loyola?


    the Church has different conclusions:

     

    Not about poverty.

    By the way, Catholic Church has said recently that helping Syrian refugees is the most important social topic of our time. I've been in Catholic services and they ask you for the money to help refugees at the final.

    Russian Orthodox Church has said that "special military operation" (i.e. invasion of Ukraine) is a holy mission that can remove your sins if you join.


    A community that has fallen into sin is in greater need to “carry a cross”
     
    Not this as they constantly write, the Christians are the most persecuted and suffering community "in this world", although not in the world to come.

    need to suffer in order to expunge one’s sins

     

    In the New Testament, suffering in this world is not related to sins, as not just constantly Jesus says (but also the later writers).
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=John+9:1-4

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

    In the New Testament, suffering in this world is not related to sins, as not just constantly Jesus says (but also the later writers).

    Early Christians have probably believed in Guilgul haNeshamot as some Jewish sects still do today, especially among the Kabbalists.

    Many Gospel passages might be interpreted this way and of course the Gnostics seem to have nearly unanimously held rebirth to be true.

    The possibility for the mindstream to attain gradual purification through the cycles of existence is the only reasonable answer to the problem of suffering.

    There’s no other compelling Theodicy.

    I have looked a lot and found no other justification for suffering.

    Most modern Abrahamic teachings are sub-par at explaining human suffering and the origin of our imperfections that are the main true source of our suffering either individual or communal.

    They basically blasphemously ascribe the imperfections in Creation to a most perfect God.

    This is of course wrong and should never be accepted.

    God is perfectly good that is why he has given us a Creation in which we might eventually come ourselves to a perfect goodness. It would of course take a long time from humans’ point of view, but there is no time for God.

    [MORE]

    This is of course quite similar to Hinduism and even Buddhism to some degree.

    And Rav. Daniel is such a humble and straightforward man.

    🙂

    • LOL: S
    • Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Bashibuzuk


    There’s no other compelling Theodicy.
     
    Gurdjieff was a goof but his Theodicy is the best. Fighting evil and whatnot brings out the geniusest in human beings.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

    , @S
    @Bashibuzuk

    Please disregard the 'LOL'. It's not supposed to be there. Typos! :-D

    , @Barbarossa
    @Bashibuzuk

    The Celts seem to have had a similar belief which filtered into their Christianity. I don't see any fundamental conflict with the teachings of Christ since Christ didn't really get into the architecture of the spiritual realities; at least in the exoteric teachings.

    Personally a form of transmigration of souls has seemed to me very plausible and seems a more complete explanation.

    As you imply, we are here to learn our lessons, and some will take longer to learn than others.

    I realize that I haven't added much to your comment but assent. Thanks anyways, as usual, for your high level of thoughtful commentary. It's generally always worth the read.

    , @Dmitry
    @Bashibuzuk


    probably believed in Guilgul haNeshamot.. mindstream to attain gradual purification through the cycles of existence is the only reasonable
     
    At least in Gospels,* Jesus believes this world is going to end very soon, almost immediately and there will be judgement, which not many will be receiving a good report in. For Jesus, the world to come is almost already visible in this world as it is now so close, as he believe they live in the end times.

    For this reason, Jesus is viewing peoples' saving as an emergency, they don't have time to slowly improve, in some example they don't even have time to bury their father.

    By the way, also for Buddha, this idea of a "gradual improvement" by the re-incarnation, can be seen as a trap, which encourages people to delay the sacrifice of themselves.

    Buddha believes being born as a human, is unlikely and rare to almost infinitely small probability. He said it like a blind turtle in the sea, that surfaces every 100 years, finding a floating hollow.

    In your next life, you could be a cow enjoying eating the grass in field in Brazil, that had been part of Amazon rainforest a few years ago. After you grow to your adult size, you, your family, your friends will go to the killing site, and your will all be murdered, your body will be cut in machines and then sent North, to be part of a hamburger that feeds a fat American. Nobody will remember you, nobody will care.

    After your life as a cow, the next life you will be an insect. Repeat thousands of times.


    basically blasphemously ascribe the imperfections in Creation to a most perfect God.

     

    This is the teaching in the Bible. You can be innocent and your family will be killed. It's not a mistake. Don't question.

    You know Bible? "Naked I came from my mother’s womb, And naked I shall return there. Lord gave and the Lord has taken away. Bless the Lord.” https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Job+1%3A18-23&version=NASB

    But the Gnostic might say to us, that this as a "Stockholm syndrome".
    -


    * Perhaps saying John is like Elijah of this epoch, not necessarily re-incarnation of Elijah. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew%2011%3A7-19&version=NIV

    Replies: @Dmitry, @Bashibuzuk

    , @silviosilver
    @Bashibuzuk


    Most modern Abrahamic teachings are sub-par at explaining human suffering and the origin of our imperfections that are the main true source of our suffering either individual or communal.

    They basically blasphemously ascribe the imperfections in Creation to a most perfect God.
     

    "Blasphemously"? More like illogically. If God hates evil (or "sin") so much, then why did he create it? Why did he create a universe in which the very possibility of evil or sin exists? He didn't have to. He is God. He could have easily created a universe with no evil and no sin. He could have created a universe with no pain, too - which I can't help thinking would have been kinda nice.

    Well he is God and I am but a lowly man, so perhaps it's wrong for me to think I could ever understand his reasons. And maybe despite the fact that so much suffering seems unnecessary, God is still "good." But can we really say he is "perfect"? God might be good, but if I can imagine a better God - eg a God that did everything else the same, but he created 1% less suffering - doesn't that mean he is not the best possible God?

    "Possible" here is a thorny term - who knows whether such a God would have been "possible" - but it still creates difficulties for people who believe God is perfect. Can he really be perfect if people can imagine a more perfect God? After all, when we say "perfect" it's our ideas about what perfect means that we are referring to, so if we can come up with something more perfect and notice that the God doesn't live up to it, we can say he is less than perfect.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk, @Coconuts

  568. @Mikhail
    @Sean


    At the begining of the war, Magregor started saying what everyone else was, but he is still saying it even though the US is proving a very, very much greater level of support for Ukraine than anyone originally expected. I think although he is a corrective to US prppaganda to a certain extent, Macgregor has began to delude himself; I certainly think his cautious credence given to Russian claims shows he is being duped and duping himself into believing the Russian overestimation of Britain’s clandestine capability, ruthlessness, and daring. The UK public have an insatiable appetite for wild stories about the SAS, and the Daily Mail ECT are happy to oblige.
     
    Macgregor still not as off the wall as Hodges. The latter believing among other things that Crimea will fall in the next 12 months.

    The more fool the Russians for believing in Minsk, because they have lost all the advantages they had over Ukraine in 2015. Now there is an open ended American commitment to Ukraine. Meanwhile, house prices in Kiev where Russians arrived in parade Uniforms and the FSB commander tried to pick out a beautiful apartment overlooking the River for himself, are continuing to rise. the manpower and strategic space of Ukraine allied to US advanced weapons and endless supply means war without end. The style of Ukrainian soldiering in this phase of the war is less ‘gets angry when you miss him’ Joe Frazier, and more Ali. Ceasing to threaten Kiev was a major mistake. Almost as bad as not mobilising in March

    Russians arms’s quality is lowering because RusFed science has not kept up; their academics are less competitive with each other and have less time for practical innovation in engineering through workload and being ‘lost in math’.
     

    In 2015, Russia wasn't as strong, in addition to wanting to be sure that (the newly reunified with Russia) Crimea would be secure. Hind sight on the initial and ongoing manner of the SMO. USSR made gross mistakes about Finland and still prevailed. The same likely to happen in this current situation.

    Kiev regime is very much militarily wasted - much more so than Russia. By 1917, Russia was much better militarily equipped than in 1914. Prolonged mass losses do have a way of changing the motivation to fight on.

    US and other Western nations are very much challenged in arms production, while lacking in the development of hypersonic weapons.

    Situations like this won't help the cause to fight Russia to the last Ukrainian:

    https://www.rt.com/news/565616-finland-ukraine-weapons-gangs/

    Replies: @Sean

    Macgregor still not as off the wall as Hodges

    Hodges said before the invasion that the Russians would be unable to take Kiev, and he was right. Just like Mearshiemer was about Russia being fated to attack Ukraine unless it had a nuclear deterent .

    In 2015, Russia wasn’t as strong

    They had the psychological momentum. The Ukrainian officers were not leading effectively in 2015; that has changed. In his TedX talk of six years ago, Hodges says Lt. Eric Wood (who fought to the death during the Battle of the Bulge on his own initiative ) and Joshua Chamberlain epitomised what is expected of an officer, and that kind of ethos was inculcated into the Ukrainan armed forces. The standing orders were to fight and not retreat unless authorised to do so. There is a lot more surveillance of commanders and other officials by the very numerous Ukrainian security police too. Putin wanted to reprise his Crimea production as if Ukraine had not taken remedial measures to ensure there could be not repitition. As John Gray says Putin is not a military man

    • Replies: @Mikhail
    @Sean


    Hodges said before the invasion that the Russians would be unable to take Kiev, and he was right. Just like Mearshiemer was about Russia being fated to attack Ukraine unless it had a nuclear deterent .
     
    Before the 2/24/22 SMO, I didn't believe the Russians would try to take Kiev in the event of their pursuing military action in the former Ukrainian SSR. Based on what has transpired, that wasn't part of the SMO.

    Along with Hodges' comment about the Kiev regime retaking Crimea within the last 12 months, he absurdly claimed that Ukrainians and not Russians beat back the Nazis.

    Concerning Mearsheimer:

    https://strategic-culture.org/news/2019/08/21/getting-real-with-the-us-foreign-policy-establishment-realists/

    Excerpt -

    On the subject of Russia and Ukraine, I’m reminded of a September 5, 2014 PBS NewsHour segment, where noted foreign policy realist John Mearsheimer said: “The Russians have made it very clear that they’re not going to tolerate a situation where Ukraine forms an alliance with NATO, the principle reason that Russia is now in Ukraine and trying to wreck Ukraine.

    And let’s be clear here. Why Russia is trying to wreck Ukraine, is because Russia doesn’t want Ukraine to become part of the West. It doesn’t want it to be integrated into NATO or the EU. And if we follow the prescriptions that Bill and I know Mike favors as well, what we are going to end up doing is further antagonizing Putin. He is going to play more hardball. And the end result is that Ukraine is going to be wrecked as a country, and we’re going to have terrible relations between Russia and the West, which is not in Russia’s interest and not in our interest
    .”

    At a University of Chicago event, Mearsheimer also singles out Russia as seeking to “wreck” Ukraine. He doesn’t use that word to characterize Western actions. Hence, his usage comes across as disproportionate and puzzling. (Offhand, I don’t recall Mearsheimer using a word like “wreck” to describe US actions in Yugoslavia, Iraq and Libya.) When compared to Russia, Mearsheimer has said that he finds more fault with the Western stances taken on Ukraine.


     
    On this matter of yours -

    They had the psychological momentum. The Ukrainian officers were not leading effectively in 2015; that has changed. In his TedX talk of six years ago, Hodges says Lt. Eric Wood (who fought to the death during the Battle of the Bulge on his own initiative ) and Joshua Chamberlain epitomised what is expected of an officer, and that kind of ethos was inculcated into the Ukrainan armed forces. The standing orders were to fight and not retreat unless authorised to do so. There is a lot more surveillance of commanders and other officials by the very numerous Ukrainian security police too. Putin wanted to reprise his Crimea production as if Ukraine had not taken remedial measures to ensure there could be not repitition. As John Gray says Putin is not a military man
     
    We seem to be in disagreement. My points about USSR-Finland in 19399 and Russia being militarily better equipped in 1917 than 1914 weren't addressed by you. These examples lead me to believe that the Kiev regime will not militarily prevail. At the very best, it could IMO possibly get an agreement losing all of the former Ukrainian SSR territory it currently doesn't control.

    Yes, the Kiev regime forces are better than in 2015. A good number of these forces are no more. Many more of them aren't so well armed and trained.

    Russia waiting til 2022 serves to show that Russia gave the peaceful option a chance.

    Replies: @Sean, @LondonBob

  569. @Beckow
    @Mikel


    ..strange claim that the Russians just had no choice but to engage in the wholesale killing of Russophones that they’re now carrying out in Eastern Ukraine
     
    The killing is part of all wars. Whether they are Russo-phones or not, in a war people in the middle die. It is very unlikely it was planned or is intentional, it simply happens in wars. I think in the West they call it 'collateral damage'.

    I have asked many times, what was the better choice for Russia? I have never heard a coherent answer. Doing nothing was not an option - Ukraine in Nato and Russian-free is not an option for them. Waiting? Pleading with loser puppets in Germany-France? What exactly is the better choice you think they had?

    Replies: @Mikel

    I have asked many times, what was the better choice for Russia? I have never heard a coherent answer.

    That’s in fact a very easy question to answer. Russia had the incomparably better choice of continuing to develop economically, trying to improve relations with everybody and maintain or enlarge the formidable security umbrella that it already had, with the largest nuclear arsenal in the world.

    Few countries could feel as secure of not being attacked by anyone as Russia, before they started this war. Now they are actually being attacked by Ukraine on their territory with the help of the West. Their security situation has worsened catastrophically because of the war.

    You have correctly pointed out in the past that Ukraine should learn to live with the fact that it will always live beside a much larger and powerful neighbor. But Russia should also learn to live with the no less obvious fact that it is surrounded by neighbors that for historical reasons, temperament or whatever have hostile attitudes towards Russia. In the long run, a peaceful and prosperous Russia concentrated on its own development would make those attitudes all but vanish, as other formerly bellicose countries have done.

    • Agree: sudden death, LatW
    • Replies: @Beckow
    @Mikel


    ...Russia had the incomparably better choice of continuing to develop economically, trying to improve relations with everybody and maintain or enlarge the formidable security umbrella that it already had, with the largest nuclear arsenal in the world.
     
    That's not an answer to my question, that is a generic high-level evasive non-answer. My question was what was Russia supposed to do about Nato moving into Ukraine and Kiev government (and obviously a large part of Ukie society) suppressing the rights of Russians in Ukraine, closing schools, banning Russian in offices, bombing them.

    That is the question and not some economic development or having nukes. Your answer amounts to telling Russia to do nothing. They couldn't do nothing - the specific situation in Ukraine that lasted for 8 years was not something any large country - and many smaller ones - could ignore.

    Both the issue of Nato moving into Ukraine and the suppression of Russians were well documented and discussed for years. It was an attempt by the West to dare Russia to do something. They either thought Russia was bluffing or they actually welcome the war. So we have a war, but to pretend that Russia had another rational choice is foolish. Doing nothing as you suggest was not an option. It wouldn't be for US, China, France, UK, in the similar circumstances.

    Try again, this time with an actual answer.

    Replies: @silviosilver, @Mikel, @Philip Owen

  570. @Bashibuzuk
    @Dmitry


    In the New Testament, suffering in this world is not related to sins, as not just constantly Jesus says (but also the later writers).
     
    Early Christians have probably believed in Guilgul haNeshamot as some Jewish sects still do today, especially among the Kabbalists.

    Many Gospel passages might be interpreted this way and of course the Gnostics seem to have nearly unanimously held rebirth to be true.

    The possibility for the mindstream to attain gradual purification through the cycles of existence is the only reasonable answer to the problem of suffering.

    There's no other compelling Theodicy.

    I have looked a lot and found no other justification for suffering.

    Most modern Abrahamic teachings are sub-par at explaining human suffering and the origin of our imperfections that are the main true source of our suffering either individual or communal.

    They basically blasphemously ascribe the imperfections in Creation to a most perfect God.

    This is of course wrong and should never be accepted.

    God is perfectly good that is why he has given us a Creation in which we might eventually come ourselves to a perfect goodness. It would of course take a long time from humans' point of view, but there is no time for God.

    https://youtu.be/pjPkfuoTvBI

    https://youtu.be/NOSp8WmbGeE

    This is of course quite similar to Hinduism and even Buddhism to some degree.

    And Rav. Daniel is such a humble and straightforward man.

    🙂

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @S, @Barbarossa, @Dmitry, @silviosilver

    There’s no other compelling Theodicy.

    Gurdjieff was a goof but his Theodicy is the best. Fighting evil and whatnot brings out the geniusest in human beings.

    • Replies: @Bashibuzuk
    @Emil Nikola Richard

    I respectfully disagree.

    Gurdjieff, just like some Gnostics before him (see what's left of the Gospel of Mary Magdalen), asserted that a person not awakened to their ultimate nature (through the Work in Gurdjieff's terms or through Gnosis in the Gnostic scriptures) cannot survive death. In fact, such a person is already dead although they could carry on living (and suffering) in purely biological (Gurdjieff would rather say mechanical) terms. Such a person is somewhat of a Baudrillard's zombie. They would have no Divine Light inside, no Buddha Nature, no Fitrah, perhaps no Consciousness at all. This type of person would be an irredeemable Icchantika that cannot be Awaken and even less so Enlightened.



    But any of Gurdjieff's disciples supposedly was exactly such a person before his Work led them to a Crystallization of their True Self. So where did the urge to Work and Crystallize come from? Ex nihilo nihil... Therefore something spiritually alive must have been there to urge the person to accomplish Work and to attain Greatness.

    What was is it if not our True Self, indeed God himself working through our psyche and guiding us in mysterious ways?

    Therefore, God did not create people so they would not transcend death without some arcane spiritual discipline. God did not deprive anyone of a spiritual nature to freely perfect oneself. God did not separate his creatures into perfectible ones and the ones damned to annihilation.

    Gurdjieff's Theodicy is a typical Gnostic one, they could not see this World as a Creation of a truly benevolent and perfect God. And I can see why, for with all the suffering and evil around us, it is the logical thing to believe: this World is imperfect because it has been created by an imperfect Demiurge and Creation is in fact an error.

    However, the World is just imperfect enough so we can eventually evolve towards perfection in our own minds and work to make this Realm a better place for at least our beloved ones, perhaps even our neighbors and in the best case scenario even some distant strangers.

    This World allows us to become better people. God created it that way to allow for everything and everyone to evolve towards Him and perfect All into His Perfection in a final Theosis. This takes time, one existence is usually not enough, some keep on their evolution after death, others have to come back to learn more, a few among us reach a level that allows for their graduation from this Realm into a higher level closer to Godhood.

    As Sufis say there are spiritual stages and stands, but I believe God loves us all.

    For God is Good.

    I am with Origen who assets that even Satan will eventually be saved. I am with Dogen Zenji who promised that even mountains and rivers will be Awakened and Enlightened. I am with Theillard de Chardin and Sufi saints who believe that ultimately only God will remain.

    Until then let the Cross of Change roll, let the Wheel of Samsara spin and let our ancestors be reborn through our offspring in an never-ending knot.

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/3a/Muzeum_Archeologiczne_i_Etnograficzne_w_%C5%81odzi_12.jpg/1280px-Muzeum_Archeologiczne_i_Etnograficzne_w_%C5%81odzi_12.jpg

    This is my subjective take on Theodicy.

    Replies: @Barbarossa

  571. @Mikel
    @Beckow


    I have asked many times, what was the better choice for Russia? I have never heard a coherent answer.
     
    That's in fact a very easy question to answer. Russia had the incomparably better choice of continuing to develop economically, trying to improve relations with everybody and maintain or enlarge the formidable security umbrella that it already had, with the largest nuclear arsenal in the world.

    Few countries could feel as secure of not being attacked by anyone as Russia, before they started this war. Now they are actually being attacked by Ukraine on their territory with the help of the West. Their security situation has worsened catastrophically because of the war.

    You have correctly pointed out in the past that Ukraine should learn to live with the fact that it will always live beside a much larger and powerful neighbor. But Russia should also learn to live with the no less obvious fact that it is surrounded by neighbors that for historical reasons, temperament or whatever have hostile attitudes towards Russia. In the long run, a peaceful and prosperous Russia concentrated on its own development would make those attitudes all but vanish, as other formerly bellicose countries have done.

    Replies: @Beckow

    …Russia had the incomparably better choice of continuing to develop economically, trying to improve relations with everybody and maintain or enlarge the formidable security umbrella that it already had, with the largest nuclear arsenal in the world.

    That’s not an answer to my question, that is a generic high-level evasive non-answer. My question was what was Russia supposed to do about Nato moving into Ukraine and Kiev government (and obviously a large part of Ukie society) suppressing the rights of Russians in Ukraine, closing schools, banning Russian in offices, bombing them.

    That is the question and not some economic development or having nukes. Your answer amounts to telling Russia to do nothing. They couldn’t do nothing – the specific situation in Ukraine that lasted for 8 years was not something any large country – and many smaller ones – could ignore.

    Both the issue of Nato moving into Ukraine and the suppression of Russians were well documented and discussed for years. It was an attempt by the West to dare Russia to do something. They either thought Russia was bluffing or they actually welcome the war. So we have a war, but to pretend that Russia had another rational choice is foolish. Doing nothing as you suggest was not an option. It wouldn’t be for US, China, France, UK, in the similar circumstances.

    Try again, this time with an actual answer.

    • Replies: @silviosilver
    @Beckow

    Based on this logic, you should have been calling for Russia to invade even before Russia did. Can you (or someone) refresh my memory: were you indeed calling for Russia to invade before the invasion?


    My question was what was Russia supposed to do about Nato moving into Ukraine and Kiev government (and obviously a large part of Ukie society) suppressing the rights of Russians in Ukraine, closing schools, banning Russian in offices, bombing them.
     
    "What was Germany supposed to do about British and French support for Poland and the Warsaw government (and obviously a large part of Polack society) suppressing the rights of Germans in Poland, closing schools, banning German, bombing them."

    You support the one but treat the other as heinous and I struggle to see what real difference between them is.

    Replies: @Beckow

    , @Mikel
    @Beckow


    That’s not an answer to my question
     
    That's a perfectly valid answer to your question. Just not the one you have decided in advance to be the only correct one so you won't bother considering its merits, which makes a discussion with you on this topic pointless.

    Silviosilver beat me to it but 10 months ago you were not here predicting that Russia would invade because it just had no other choice. Like basically everyone at the time, you surely didn't think Putin would take such an extreme measure as a full invasion of Ukraine. You really come across as someone who will always defend anything Russia does, be it one thing or the opposite.

    The comparison with what other "big countries" would do in Russia's position (just the US really, the rest are second fiddles) doesn't fly with me at all. I'm actually trying to hold Russia to the same standards as I hold the US, where I supported a MAGA movement that was also supposed to concentrate on economic development and abandon foreign military interventions and commitments (before his leader forgot what platform he had won the election with). This movement continues to have plenty of popular support in the US btw and we may one day see it applying those policies in earnest but perhaps it is you who thinks that Russians are too primitive to follow such a civilized course of action.

    I happen to be in favor of the right to secession in almost all circumstances so in my view Russian and other ethnic minorities that ended on the wrong side of the post-USSR borders should be allowed to join whichever state of their liking in properly held referendums. But there are countless countries in the world with ethnic diasporas scattered in neighboring countries (among them some big ones like China or Germany) and they don't go invading their neighbors anymore. Russia has the choice of being just like any of these countries, no more no less.

    The idea that Ukraine possibly joining NATO and oppressing the Russian language left Russia with no choice but to start a war where NATO has enlarged to two additional neighbors, de facto now operates in Ukraine like never before and many more innocent Russophone civilians are being killed by Russia itself than Ukraine ever did is just ridiculous. Western countries' euphemism of "collateral damage" never referred to the killing of their own civilians, btw, which they never did. This war has been a total disaster, even from the perspective of what Russia was supposed to achieve. We are all much worse off because of it, including yourself, but for some strange reason you feel the need to support it.

    Replies: @A123, @Beckow, @Wokechoke, @Philip Owen

    , @Philip Owen
    @Beckow

    NATO didn't move into Ukraine.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

  572. @Bashibuzuk
    @Dmitry


    In the New Testament, suffering in this world is not related to sins, as not just constantly Jesus says (but also the later writers).
     
    Early Christians have probably believed in Guilgul haNeshamot as some Jewish sects still do today, especially among the Kabbalists.

    Many Gospel passages might be interpreted this way and of course the Gnostics seem to have nearly unanimously held rebirth to be true.

    The possibility for the mindstream to attain gradual purification through the cycles of existence is the only reasonable answer to the problem of suffering.

    There's no other compelling Theodicy.

    I have looked a lot and found no other justification for suffering.

    Most modern Abrahamic teachings are sub-par at explaining human suffering and the origin of our imperfections that are the main true source of our suffering either individual or communal.

    They basically blasphemously ascribe the imperfections in Creation to a most perfect God.

    This is of course wrong and should never be accepted.

    God is perfectly good that is why he has given us a Creation in which we might eventually come ourselves to a perfect goodness. It would of course take a long time from humans' point of view, but there is no time for God.

    https://youtu.be/pjPkfuoTvBI

    https://youtu.be/NOSp8WmbGeE

    This is of course quite similar to Hinduism and even Buddhism to some degree.

    And Rav. Daniel is such a humble and straightforward man.

    🙂

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @S, @Barbarossa, @Dmitry, @silviosilver

    Please disregard the ‘LOL’. It’s not supposed to be there. Typos! 😀

    • LOL: Bashibuzuk
  573. @AP
    @Beckow

    You lie about me as you lie about everything else.

    And there is an element of projection in your lies; you are the semi-educated product of socialist schools, repeating the anti-Christian and anti-Catholic myths that were stuffed into your simple mind by your masters. He schools in the USA followed the British-Protestant tradition and probably had similar myths about the Holy Inquisition.


    The concept of Purgatory was gradually invented only in the 13.-14. centuries, it is a marginal part of the catholic faith
     
    We Eastern Catholics and the Orthodox don’t talk about Purgatory.

    But numerous devout Roman Catholics find meaning in their physical suffering by the idea that suffering in this world will reduce their time in purgatory. I heard this several times when I had worked in a setting with terminally patients, it was not a marginal idea.

    Replies: @Beckow, @Barbarossa

    We Eastern Catholics

    For some reason I thought you were Roman. Or am I remembering correctly you switched rites?

  574. You do not have to be Sikh to be good with a blade. [MORE]

    😆😂 Take that Sher Singh !!! 😂😆

    PEACE 😇

    [MORE]

    • Thanks: Bashibuzuk
  575. @Bashibuzuk
    @LatW


    the resources that the RusFed wanted to take over belong to Ukraine
     
    I was referring to the overall trend in downsizing the natural ressources consumption under the circular economy promoted as part of the fourth industrial revolution. They believe in balancing human consumption with the overall ressources of the biosphere. At least as long as we don't have sufficient energy to and technological advances for an access to Solar System's ressources.

    OTOH, there's not that much ressources that RusFed would have wanted to take over in Ukraine. Black soils for agricultural purposes and human ressources come to mind along with what was left of Soviet technology in aerospace and some other high tech fields. And all that was accessible under the agreement for Eurasian Economic Union. Remember that RusFed offered EU to have tripartite discussions with Ukraine in 2013, an offer EU declined.


    they should avoid open wars, but try to take over via trade, mergers, acquisitions, etc.
     
    A simple manner to restrict ressources consumption is through outright depopulation. Remember the bison slaughter on the Great Plains to force the bison hunting tribes off the land and into the reservations. Today, warfare and ensuing technosphere, electric grid and overall damage to industry would play the same role. Force the "wrong people" out of the land as refugees and drop their already low birth rate. Then in a couple of generations (this is the time the fourth industrial revolution transition would take according to Chubais) you can take this land and give it to the "right people".

    Whereas with an outright invasion, the West saw it as more of a threat and, because Ukraine managed to fight back, the West granted support. Had this not happened it’d be business as usual and Russia could’ve continued its creeping annexations.
     
    Pynya got tricked just like Saddam in Koweit. For whatever reason (probably some backdoor deal with some global elite faction) he thought that the SMO would go as smoothly in Ukraine as it did in Kazakhstan. Why he believed it is a mystery, perhaps he has been promised an anti-Zelensky coup in Ukraine? And he was ready and willing to push back Donbass rebel regions into a federated Ukraine under the Minsk 2 agreement.

    What is truly amazing is his anti-NATO ultimatum. He couldn't have possibly thought that NATO would seriously discuss it. It was monumental chutzpah which is not the way he usually behaves. There is something mysterious about this topic, some information we will probably never know.

    You think it really will be “transhuman”? You think human beings want to live that way?
     
    The plebs will be forced to live in a human anthill like manner under a Big Data social score system in smart cities. The plebs will stop reproducing, but that would be a feature not a bug. The elite would enjoy a far greater lifespan, better health and enhanced cognitive capabilities. They will have an infinitely higher standard of living compared to the masses if plebs. Then after a few generations, the human population would reach a technological level that would allow humans to colonize Solar System, while the biosphere would be restored and the plebs would mostly perish in their smart city "mouse utopia" (as per Calhoun's Universe 25).

    Well, don’t you think both of those Globalist projects are dependent on each other?
     
    Yes they are, it is a false dichotomy just like Communism vs Capitalism in the previous Cold War. Two roads leading to the same cliff (to use Shafarevich's book title). But in the end the question would be who is in control: the Globalized Western elites or the CCP Nomenklatura? That is what the fighting will be all about, not some "human rights" BS.

    then those on your side, who are not willing to stay under China and want to be closer to us, will still be separated from us, which is really lame.
     
    Those "on my side" want nothing to do with any type of Globalist agenda, either Western or Chinese. They are both inhumane and will both most probably lead to catastrophic consequences in the end. Those "on my side " are to be found all around the world, China included. Most people want to stay human and have a somewhat meaningful normal human life. Transhumanists and Technofetishists are few and far between. Nevertheless, the silent majority will most probably end up forced to live under the Globalist managed system. And it will mean its genetic lineages elimination from the global gene pool after a few generations.

    It started with the Munich speech in 2007.
     
    According to Klaus Schwab, Pynya was a WEF Young Global Leader since his early years in politics. They probably assigned him the role of the "Russian Ubervilain" to be feared by the Western middle class. A middle class sheeple distracted by Pynya's antics, while being carefully and patiently downsized and corralled fowards extinction.

    The issue is that neither one of those is wanted anymore these days. So one must either live with what is currently available, or create some alternative metaphysics. Or re-invigorate something old.
     
    This is true. We need re-invigorated metaphysics. I think we will not manage to preserve human civilization without it. All the Transhumanist claims to the opposite non withstanding. They believe in deus ex machina but their "gods" are "technological demons". We need to bring back human archetypes of the higher kind from the collective subconscious to oppose the Technosphere and its pseudo-sentient entities.

    Mostly they just want to be left alone (but also for Ukraine to be left alone). Everyone just wants to be treated as an equal but that’s not what you guys want. You both want to be above. But you can’t do that in our space. We’re not asking for much.
     
    Unfortunately, you will not be left alone, nobody will. Anyway, your elites clearly enjoy the "клоуны у п☆дорасов" status (to use Pelevin's aphorism). So they will be used and abused by the Globalist and you will suffer as much or even more than anybody else.

    Yes, because RusFed was not a victim of Poland so they don’t care and can be more relaxed.
     
    Russians have been on the receiving end of German warfare during both World Wars, but they have no ill will towards Germany. They mostly have no ill will towards US and UK despite the Anglosphere being their main opponent for generations. Russians are naturally a quite forgiving people despite all the propaganda of the Armenian-Jewish RusFed media.

    You seem to care a lot about Old Europe all of a sudden.
     
    I don't like unjust situations. Old Europe has worked its arses off to build EC into EU and now they kind of are pushed around by the EEs who have decided to be loyal Atlanticist henchmen for reasons of historical revanchism and economic opportunism. But this applies to the elites, the normal folks, who mostly are my genetic relatives, are probably not even aware of the roles their nations have been assigned to. Normal folks just want a quiet life.

    Nobody should be dictated to. That’s one thing we should all learn. We should try to approach each other calmly and respectfully but it’s hard during such a horrific war.
     
    We will all be dictated about how we must behave by the Globalist technocrats. They are today's Nomenklatura. They think they know better how we should live our lives. That's the expected behavior of a bunch of highly achieving sociopaths.

    Replies: @LatW, @S

    Those “on my side ” are to be found all around the world, China included. Most people want to stay human and have a somewhat meaningful normal human life…Nevertheless, the silent majority will most probably end up forced to live under the Globalist managed system. And it will mean its genetic lineages elimination from the global gene pool after a few generations.

    This is a valid point.

    A well provided for geographic space designated just for refugees should have been created long ago.

    Similarly, there are clearly those who simply are indifferent, or, are even hostile to the idea of race, ethnicity, or identity. A place with abundant natural resources (and amply documenting that fact from the start) should have been set aside just for them. Every people could have contributed something of significance to it.

    There, if their ideas are correct, ie ‘everyone is just the same’ and ‘love conquers all’, they could of set an example for the rest of the world. If they were wrong, that too could have been an example for the world.

    As it has been, as you have alluded, the ‘majority’ who do care about things regarding race and ethnicity, have been being forced by diktat to give up their identities. This was never fair to them. What I described above would have been fair to both the universalists and those who care about identity.

    Of course, if someone wished to acquire total world power for themselves, they could never tolerate such a thing.

    Yes they are, it is a false dichotomy just like Communism vs Capitalism in the previous Cold War. Two roads leading to the same cliff (to use Shafarevich’s book title).

    Below is a picture of arm in arm American and Soviet soldiers, these being the respective representatives of the armies of the then flagship states of Capitalism and Communism, taken near the close of the war in Torgau, Germany in late April, 1945.

    It is highly symbolic in many ways of the manufactured and broadly controlled (crimethink, I know) Capitalist artificial hyper-individualist thesis vs the Communist artificial hyper-collectivist anti-thesis dialectic, and their coming together in global Multi-Cultural synthesis.

    While I seriously doubt the soldiers and photographers involved in taking such pics understood the dialectical significance of such imagery, there is little doubt that the upper echelons of the elites and their hangers on who ordered such be made (and propagated) surely did.

    • Replies: @Bashibuzuk
    @S

    There would be neither Soviet nor Nazi rapid build up of war industry if not for Anglo-saxon finances and technological transfers. Anthony Sutton and other researchers in the West and post-Soviet Russia have demonstrated this. The Germans and the Slavs have been primed to kill each other. Also Germans have been primed to push the Zionist Jews out of Europe and towards the Holy Land while they simultaneously exterminate the religious Orthodox anti-Zionist Jewry. Tens of millions died, Europe was drenched in blood and scortched with fire. It was a risky and dirty affair but it worked in the end. When the Devil plays chess he plays both sides of the board game. Globalists are the masters of (false) dialectics...

    Replies: @S

  576. Is this guy a crank, or onto something?

    [MORE]

    BTW, I once thought it would be a great idea to have a horror movie explain why the Vikings disappeared from the Azores.

    • Replies: @Bashibuzuk
    @songbird

    Thanks for this video.

    https://archaeology-world.com/sunken-atlantis-pyramid-discovered-off-azores-coast-in-portugal/

    The location of Azores fits well with Plato's Atlantis description.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard

  577. Bashibuzuk says:
    @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Bashibuzuk


    There’s no other compelling Theodicy.
     
    Gurdjieff was a goof but his Theodicy is the best. Fighting evil and whatnot brings out the geniusest in human beings.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

    I respectfully disagree.

    Gurdjieff, just like some Gnostics before him (see what’s left of the Gospel of Mary Magdalen), asserted that a person not awakened to their ultimate nature (through the Work in Gurdjieff’s terms or through Gnosis in the Gnostic scriptures) cannot survive death. In fact, such a person is already dead although they could carry on living (and suffering) in purely biological (Gurdjieff would rather say mechanical) terms. Such a person is somewhat of a Baudrillard’s zombie. They would have no Divine Light inside, no Buddha Nature, no Fitrah, perhaps no Consciousness at all. This type of person would be an irredeemable Icchantika that cannot be Awaken and even less so Enlightened.

    [MORE]

    But any of Gurdjieff’s disciples supposedly was exactly such a person before his Work led them to a Crystallization of their True Self. So where did the urge to Work and Crystallize come from? Ex nihilo nihil… Therefore something spiritually alive must have been there to urge the person to accomplish Work and to attain Greatness.

    What was is it if not our True Self, indeed God himself working through our psyche and guiding us in mysterious ways?

    Therefore, God did not create people so they would not transcend death without some arcane spiritual discipline. God did not deprive anyone of a spiritual nature to freely perfect oneself. God did not separate his creatures into perfectible ones and the ones damned to annihilation.

    Gurdjieff’s Theodicy is a typical Gnostic one, they could not see this World as a Creation of a truly benevolent and perfect God. And I can see why, for with all the suffering and evil around us, it is the logical thing to believe: this World is imperfect because it has been created by an imperfect Demiurge and Creation is in fact an error.

    However, the World is just imperfect enough so we can eventually evolve towards perfection in our own minds and work to make this Realm a better place for at least our beloved ones, perhaps even our neighbors and in the best case scenario even some distant strangers.

    This World allows us to become better people. God created it that way to allow for everything and everyone to evolve towards Him and perfect All into His Perfection in a final Theosis. This takes time, one existence is usually not enough, some keep on their evolution after death, others have to come back to learn more, a few among us reach a level that allows for their graduation from this Realm into a higher level closer to Godhood.

    As Sufis say there are spiritual stages and stands, but I believe God loves us all.

    For God is Good.

    I am with Origen who assets that even Satan will eventually be saved. I am with Dogen Zenji who promised that even mountains and rivers will be Awakened and Enlightened. I am with Theillard de Chardin and Sufi saints who believe that ultimately only God will remain.

    Until then let the Cross of Change roll, let the Wheel of Samsara spin and let our ancestors be reborn through our offspring in an never-ending knot.

    This is my subjective take on Theodicy.

    • Replies: @Barbarossa
    @Bashibuzuk


    They would have no Divine Light inside, no Buddha Nature, no Fitrah, perhaps no Consciousness at all. This type of person would be an irredeemable Icchantika that cannot be Awaken and even less so Enlightened.
     
    I would say that this state can also be termed Hell. We are not put into Hell, but we are fully capable of putting ourselves there, though it takes some work. God never turns away from us, but we are fully capable of rejecting God and if this is done in a systematic enough way we create a willful separation from the Divine. Such a person may become worse than an animal, as the Divine nature twisted inside of them will invent perversions of creation that no lower animal is capable of.

    But I have to agree with you that in the end even these will be unable to deny the power of the essential Divine Reality.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

  578. @Bashibuzuk
    @Dmitry


    In the New Testament, suffering in this world is not related to sins, as not just constantly Jesus says (but also the later writers).
     
    Early Christians have probably believed in Guilgul haNeshamot as some Jewish sects still do today, especially among the Kabbalists.

    Many Gospel passages might be interpreted this way and of course the Gnostics seem to have nearly unanimously held rebirth to be true.

    The possibility for the mindstream to attain gradual purification through the cycles of existence is the only reasonable answer to the problem of suffering.

    There's no other compelling Theodicy.

    I have looked a lot and found no other justification for suffering.

    Most modern Abrahamic teachings are sub-par at explaining human suffering and the origin of our imperfections that are the main true source of our suffering either individual or communal.

    They basically blasphemously ascribe the imperfections in Creation to a most perfect God.

    This is of course wrong and should never be accepted.

    God is perfectly good that is why he has given us a Creation in which we might eventually come ourselves to a perfect goodness. It would of course take a long time from humans' point of view, but there is no time for God.

    https://youtu.be/pjPkfuoTvBI

    https://youtu.be/NOSp8WmbGeE

    This is of course quite similar to Hinduism and even Buddhism to some degree.

    And Rav. Daniel is such a humble and straightforward man.

    🙂

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @S, @Barbarossa, @Dmitry, @silviosilver

    The Celts seem to have had a similar belief which filtered into their Christianity. I don’t see any fundamental conflict with the teachings of Christ since Christ didn’t really get into the architecture of the spiritual realities; at least in the exoteric teachings.

    Personally a form of transmigration of souls has seemed to me very plausible and seems a more complete explanation.

    As you imply, we are here to learn our lessons, and some will take longer to learn than others.

    I realize that I haven’t added much to your comment but assent. Thanks anyways, as usual, for your high level of thoughtful commentary. It’s generally always worth the read.

    • Thanks: Bashibuzuk
  579. Bashibuzuk says:
    @S
    @Bashibuzuk


    Those “on my side ” are to be found all around the world, China included. Most people want to stay human and have a somewhat meaningful normal human life...Nevertheless, the silent majority will most probably end up forced to live under the Globalist managed system. And it will mean its genetic lineages elimination from the global gene pool after a few generations.
     
    This is a valid point.

    A well provided for geographic space designated just for refugees should have been created long ago.

    Similarly, there are clearly those who simply are indifferent, or, are even hostile to the idea of race, ethnicity, or identity. A place with abundant natural resources (and amply documenting that fact from the start) should have been set aside just for them. Every people could have contributed something of significance to it.

    There, if their ideas are correct, ie 'everyone is just the same' and 'love conquers all', they could of set an example for the rest of the world. If they were wrong, that too could have been an example for the world.

    As it has been, as you have alluded, the 'majority' who do care about things regarding race and ethnicity, have been being forced by diktat to give up their identities. This was never fair to them. What I described above would have been fair to both the universalists and those who care about identity.

    Of course, if someone wished to acquire total world power for themselves, they could never tolerate such a thing.

    Yes they are, it is a false dichotomy just like Communism vs Capitalism in the previous Cold War. Two roads leading to the same cliff (to use Shafarevich’s book title).
     
    Below is a picture of arm in arm American and Soviet soldiers, these being the respective representatives of the armies of the then flagship states of Capitalism and Communism, taken near the close of the war in Torgau, Germany in late April, 1945.

    It is highly symbolic in many ways of the manufactured and broadly controlled (crimethink, I know) Capitalist artificial hyper-individualist thesis vs the Communist artificial hyper-collectivist anti-thesis dialectic, and their coming together in global Multi-Cultural synthesis.

    While I seriously doubt the soldiers and photographers involved in taking such pics understood the dialectical significance of such imagery, there is little doubt that the upper echelons of the elites and their hangers on who ordered such be made (and propagated) surely did.


    https://www.historyplace.com/worldwar2/defeat/downfall-us-russians.jpg

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

    There would be neither Soviet nor Nazi rapid build up of war industry if not for Anglo-saxon finances and technological transfers. Anthony Sutton and other researchers in the West and post-Soviet Russia have demonstrated this. The Germans and the Slavs have been primed to kill each other. Also Germans have been primed to push the Zionist Jews out of Europe and towards the Holy Land while they simultaneously exterminate the religious Orthodox anti-Zionist Jewry. Tens of millions died, Europe was drenched in blood and scortched with fire. It was a risky and dirty affair but it worked in the end. When the Devil plays chess he plays both sides of the board game. Globalists are the masters of (false) dialectics…

    • Replies: @S
    @Bashibuzuk


    There would be neither Soviet nor Nazi rapid build up of war industry if not for Anglo-saxon finances and technological transfers. Anthony Sutton and other researchers in the West and post-Soviet Russia have demonstrated this. The Germans and the Slavs have been primed to kill each other.
     
    Yes, as you allude there was an Italian fellow (his name escapes me at the moment) who wrote a book entitled Conjuring Hitler which alleged much the same as Sutton.

    A little over a decade ago Rolling Stone magazine published a huge article (linked to and reproduced below 'More') which claim Goldman Sach's has manipulated into being every market bubble since the Great Depression for profits sake.

    As is known, Hitler was having some trouble getting into power in Germany in the 1920's. Though the article doesn't say so, I think it's entirely possible the Great Depression itself, in addition for the generic purpose of profit taking, had been engineered specifically for the purpose of catapulting Hitler into power in Germany.

    They wanted the most radical and militant expression of German identity in power, so as to most likely ensure the starting of a world war that would (1) do as much damage to Russia and the Russian people as possible (2) once the trap had been sprung, make the crushing of German identity as complete and thorough as possible when the overwhelming power of the controlled Capitalist vs Communist dialectic (as encapsulated respectively by the US/UK and Soviet Union) inevitably closed in upon them.

    Now, with WWIII, the US/UK and allies hope to do the same to Russia (and China, Eastern Europe, Turkey, etc) what was done to Germany (and Japan) in WWII.

    I think the elements and hangers on of the US/UK elites behind these world wars quite questionable rationalization to themselves is, in part that, 'it was going to happen anyway', and, 'we're just helping things along'.

    And, of course, there is always 'the ends justify the means'.


    The Great American Bubble Machine

    From tech stocks to high gas prices, Goldman Sachs has engineered every major market manipulation since the Great Depression — and they're about to do it again.

    The first thing you need to know about Goldman Sachs is that it’s everywhere. The world’s most powerful investment bank is a great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity, relentlessly jamming its blood funnel into anything that smells like money. In fact, the history of the recent financial crisis, which doubles as a history of the rapid decline and fall of the suddenly swindled dry American empire, reads like a Who’s Who of Goldman Sachs graduates.
     


    By now, most of us know the major players. As George Bush’s last Treasury secretary, former Goldman CEO Henry Paulson was the architect of the bailout, a suspiciously self-serving plan to funnel trillions of Your Dollars to a handful of his old friends on Wall Street. Robert Rubin, Bill Clinton’s former Treasury secretary, spent 26 years at Goldman before becoming chairman of Citigroup — which in turn got a $300 billion taxpayer bailout from Paulson. There’s John Thain, the asshole chief of Merrill Lynch who bought an $87,000 area rug for his office as his company was imploding; a former Goldman banker, Thain enjoyed a multi-billion-dollar handout from Paulson, who used billions in taxpayer funds to help Bank of America rescue Thain’s sorry company. And Robert Steel, the former Goldmanite head of Wachovia, scored himself and his fellow executives $225 million in golden-parachute payments as his bank was self-destructing. There’s Joshua Bolten, Bush’s chief of staff during the bailout, and Mark Patterson, the current Treasury chief of staff, who was a Goldman lobbyist just a year ago, and Ed Liddy, the former Goldman director whom Paulson put in charge of bailed-out insurance giant AIG, which forked over $13 billion to Goldman after Liddy came on board. The heads of the Canadian and Italian national banks are Goldman alums, as is the head of the World Bank, the head of the New York Stock Exchange, the last two heads of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York — which, incidentally, is now in charge of overseeing Goldman — not to mention …

    But then, any attempt to construct a narrative around all the former Goldmanites in influential positions quickly becomes an absurd and pointless exercise, like trying to make a list of everything. What you need to know is the big picture: If America is circling the drain, Goldman Sachs has found a way to be that drain — an extremely unfortunate loophole in the system of Western democratic capitalism, which never foresaw that in a society governed passively by free markets and free elections, organized greed always defeats disorganized democracy.

    The bank’s unprecedented reach and power have enabled it to turn all of America into a giant pump-and-dump scam, manipulating whole economic sectors for years at a time, moving the dice game as this or that market collapses, and all the time gorging itself on the unseen costs that are breaking families everywhere — high gas prices, rising consumer credit rates, half-eaten pension funds, mass layoffs, future taxes to pay off bailouts. All that money that you’re losing, it’s going somewhere, and in both a literal and a figurative sense, Goldman Sachs is where it’s going: The bank is a huge, highly sophisticated engine for converting the useful, deployed wealth of society into the least useful, most wasteful and insoluble substance on Earth — pure profit for rich individuals.

    The Feds vs. Goldman

    They achieve this using the same playbook over and over again. The formula is relatively simple: Goldman positions itself in the middle of a speculative bubble, selling investments they know are crap. Then they hoover up vast sums from the middle and lower floors of society with the aid of a crippled and corrupt state that allows it to rewrite the rules in exchange for the relative pennies the bank throws at political patronage. Finally, when it all goes bust, leaving millions of ordinary citizens broke and starving, they begin the entire process over again, riding in to rescue us all by lending us back our own money at interest, selling themselves as men above greed, just a bunch of really smart guys keeping the wheels greased. They’ve been pulling this same stunt over and over since the 1920s — and now they’re preparing to do it again, creating what may be the biggest and most audacious bubble yet.

    If you want to understand how we got into this financial crisis, you have to first understand where all the money went — and in order to understand that, you need to understand what Goldman has already gotten away with. It is a history exactly five bubbles long — including last year’s strange and seemingly inexplicable spike in the price of oil. There were a lot of losers in each of those bubbles, and in the bailout that followed. But Goldman wasn’t one of them.

    BUBBLE #1 The Great Depression

    Goldman wasn’t always a too-big-to-fail Wall Street behemoth, the ruthless face of kill-or-be-killed capitalism on steroids —just almost always. The bank was actually founded in 1869 by a German immigrant named Marcus Goldman, who built it up with his son-in-law Samuel Sachs. They were pioneers in the use of commercial paper, which is just a fancy way of saying they made money lending out short-term IOUs to smalltime vendors in downtown Manhattan.

    You can probably guess the basic plotline of Goldman’s first 100 years in business: plucky, immigrant-led investment bank beats the odds, pulls itself up by its bootstraps, makes shitloads of money. In that ancient history there’s really only one episode that bears scrutiny now, in light of more recent events: Goldman’s disastrous foray into the speculative mania of pre-crash Wall Street in the late 1920s.

    Wall Street’s Big Win

    This great Hindenburg of financial history has a few features that might sound familiar. Back then, the main financial tool used to bilk investors was called an “investment trust.” Similar to modern mutual funds, the trusts took the cash of investors large and small and (theoretically, at least) invested it in a smorgasbord of Wall Street securities, though the securities and amounts were often kept hidden from the public. So a regular guy could invest $10 or $100 in a trust and feel like he was a big player. Much as in the 1990s, when new vehicles like day trading and e-trading attracted reams of new suckers from the sticks who wanted to feel like big shots, investment trusts roped a new generation of regular-guy investors into the speculation game.

    Beginning a pattern that would repeat itself over and over again, Goldman got into the investmenttrust game late, then jumped in with both feet and went hogwild. The first effort was the Goldman Sachs Trading Corporation; the bank issued a million shares at $100 apiece, bought all those shares with its own money and then sold 90 percent of them to the hungry public at $104. The trading corporation then relentlessly bought shares in itself, bidding the price up further and further. Eventually it dumped part of its holdings and sponsored a new trust, the Shenandoah Corporation, issuing millions more in shares in that fund — which in turn sponsored yet another trust called the Blue Ridge Corporation. In this way, each investment trust served as a front for an endless investment pyramid: Goldman hiding behind Goldman hiding behind Goldman. Of the 7,250,000 initial shares of Blue Ridge, 6,250,000 were actually owned by Shenandoah — which, of course, was in large part owned by Goldman Trading.

    The end result (ask yourself if this sounds familiar) was a daisy chain of borrowed money, one exquisitely vulnerable to a decline in performance anywhere along the line. The basic idea isn’t hard to follow. You take a dollar and borrow nine against it; then you take that $10 fund and borrow $90; then you take your $100 fund and, so long as the public is still lending, borrow and invest $900. If the last fund in the line starts to lose value, you no longer have the money to pay back your investors, and everyone gets massacred.

    In a chapter from The Great Crash, 1929 titled “In Goldman Sachs We Trust,” the famed economist John Kenneth Galbraith held up the Blue Ridge and Shenandoah trusts as classic examples of the insanity of leveragebased investment. The trusts, he wrote, were a major cause of the market’s historic crash; in today’s dollars, the losses the bank suffered totaled $475 billion. “It is difficult not to marvel at the imagination which was implicit in this gargantuan insanity,” Galbraith observed, sounding like Keith Olbermann in an ascot. “If there must be madness, something may be said for having it on a heroic scale.”

    BUBBLE #2 Tech Stocks

    Fast-forward about 65 years. Goldman not only survived the crash that wiped out so many of the investors it duped, it went on to become the chief underwriter to the country’s wealthiest and most powerful corporations. Thanks to Sidney Weinberg, who rose from the rank of janitor’s assistant to head the firm, Goldman became the pioneer of the initial public offering, one of the principal and most lucrative means by which companies raise money. During the 1970s and 1980s, Goldman may not have been the planet-eating Death Star of political influence it is today, but it was a top-drawer firm that had a reputation for attracting the very smartest talent on the Street.

    It also, oddly enough, had a reputation for relatively solid ethics and a patient approach to investment that shunned the fast buck; its executives were trained to adopt the firm’s mantra, “long-term greedy.” One former Goldman banker who left the firm in the early Nineties recalls seeing his superiors give up a very profitable deal on the grounds that it was a long-term loser. “We gave back money to ‘grownup’ corporate clients who had made bad deals with us,” he says. “Everything we did was legal and fair — but ‘long-term greedy’ said we didn’t want to make such a profit at the clients’ collective expense that we spoiled the marketplace.”

    But then, something happened. It’s hard to say what it was exactly; it might have been the fact that Goldman’s cochairman in the early Nineties, Robert Rubin, followed Bill Clinton to the White House, where he directed the National Economic Council and eventually became Treasury secretary. While the American media fell in love with the story line of a pair of baby-boomer, Sixties-child, Fleetwood Mac yuppies nesting in the White House, it also nursed an undisguised crush on Rubin, who was hyped as without a doubt the smartest person ever to walk the face of the Earth, with Newton, Einstein, Mozart and Kant running far behind.

    Rubin was the prototypical Goldman banker. He was probably born in a $4,000 suit, he had a face that seemed permanently frozen just short of an apology for being so much smarter than you, and he exuded a Spock-like, emotion-neutral exterior; the only human feeling you could imagine him experiencing was a nightmare about being forced to fly coach. It became almost a national clichè that whatever Rubin thought was best for the economy — a phenomenon that reached its apex in 1999, when Rubin appeared on the cover of Time with his Treasury deputy, Larry Summers, and Fed chief Alan Greenspan under the headline The Committee To Save The World. And “what Rubin thought,” mostly, was that the American economy, and in particular the financial markets, were over-regulated and needed to be set free. During his tenure at Treasury, the Clinton White House made a series of moves that would have drastic consequences for the global economy — beginning with Rubin’s complete and total failure to regulate his old firm during its first mad dash for obscene short-term profits.

    The basic scam in the Internet Age is pretty easy even for the financially illiterate to grasp. Companies that weren’t much more than pot-fueled ideas scrawled on napkins by uptoolate bongsmokers were taken public via IPOs, hyped in the media and sold to the public for mega-millions. It was as if banks like Goldman were wrapping ribbons around watermelons, tossing them out 50-story windows and opening the phones for bids. In this game you were a winner only if you took your money out before the melon hit the pavement.

    It sounds obvious now, but what the average investor didn’t know at the time was that the banks had changed the rules of the game, making the deals look better than they actually were. They did this by setting up what was, in reality, a two-tiered investment system — one for the insiders who knew the real numbers, and another for the lay investor who was invited to chase soaring prices the banks themselves knew were irrational. While Goldman’s later pattern would be to capitalize on changes in the regulatory environment, its key innovation in the Internet years was to abandon its own industry’s standards of quality control.

    “Since the Depression, there were strict underwriting guidelines that Wall Street adhered to when taking a company public,” says one prominent hedge-fund manager. “The company had to be in business for a minimum of five years, and it had to show profitability for three consecutive years. But Wall Street took these guidelines and threw them in the trash.” Goldman completed the snow job by pumping up the sham stocks: “Their analysts were out there saying Bullshit.com is worth $100 a share.”

    The problem was, nobody told investors that the rules had changed. “Everyone on the inside knew,” the manager says. “Bob Rubin sure as hell knew what the underwriting standards were. They’d been intact since the 1930s.”

    Jay Ritter, a professor of finance at the University of Florida who specializes in IPOs, says banks like Goldman knew full well that many of the public offerings they were touting would never make a dime. “In the early Eighties, the major underwriters insisted on three years of profitability. Then it was one year, then it was a quarter. By the time of the Internet bubble, they were not even requiring profitability in the foreseeable future.”

    Goldman has denied that it changed its underwriting standards during the Internet years, but its own statistics belie the claim. Just as it did with the investment trust in the 1920s, Goldman started slow and finished crazy in the Internet years. After it took a little-known company with weak financials called Yahoo! public in 1996, once the tech boom had already begun, Goldman quickly became the IPO king of the Internet era. Of the 24 companies it took public in 1997, a third were losing money at the time of the IPO. In 1999, at the height of the boom, it took 47 companies public, including stillborns like Webvan and eToys, investment offerings that were in many ways the modern equivalents of Blue Ridge and Shenandoah. The following year, it underwrote 18 companies in the first four months, 14 of which were money losers at the time. As a leading underwriter of Internet stocks during the boom, Goldman provided profits far more volatile than those of its competitors: In 1999, the average Goldman IPO leapt 281 percent above its offering price, compared to the Wall Street average of 181 percent.

    How did Goldman achieve such extraordinary results? One answer is that they used a practice called “laddering,” which is just a fancy way of saying they manipulated the share price of new offerings. Here’s how it works: Say you’re Goldman Sachs, and Bullshit.com comes to you and asks you to take their company public. You agree on the usual terms: You’ll price the stock, determine how many shares should be released and take the Bullshit.com CEO on a “road show” to schmooze investors, all in exchange for a substantial fee (typically six to seven percent of the amount raised). You then promise your best clients the right to buy big chunks of the IPO at the low offering price — let’s say Bullshit.com’s starting share price is $15 — in exchange for a promise that they will buy more shares later on the open market. That seemingly simple demand gives you inside knowledge of the IPO’s future, knowledge that wasn’t disclosed to the day trader schmucks who only had the prospectus to go by: You know that certain of your clients who bought X amount of shares at $15 are also going to buy Y more shares at $20 or $25, virtually guaranteeing that the price is going to go to $25 and beyond. In this way, Goldman could artificially jack up the new company’s price, which of course was to the bank’s benefit — a six percent fee of a $500 million IPO is serious money.

    Goldman was repeatedly sued by shareholders for engaging in laddering in a variety of Internet IPOs, including Webvan and NetZero. The deceptive practices also caught the attention of Nicholas Maier, the syndicate manager of Cramer & Co., the hedge fund run at the time by the now-famous chattering television asshole Jim Cramer, himself a Goldman alum. Maier told the SEC that while working for Cramer between 1996 and 1998, he was repeatedly forced to engage in laddering practices during IPO deals with Goldman.

    “Goldman, from what I witnessed, they were the worst perpetrator,” Maier said. “They totally fueled the bubble. And it’s specifically that kind of behavior that has caused the market crash. They built these stocks upon an illegal foundation — manipulated up — and ultimately, it really was the small person who ended up buying in.” In 2005, Goldman agreed to pay $40 million for its laddering violations — a puny penalty relative to the enormous profits it made. (Goldman, which has denied wrongdoing in all of the cases it has settled, refused to respond to questions for this story.)

    Another practice Goldman engaged in during the Internet boom was “spinning,” better known as bribery. Here the investment bank would offer the executives of the newly public company shares at extra-low prices, in exchange for future underwriting business. Banks that engaged in spinning would then undervalue the initial offering price — ensuring that those “hot” opening-price shares it had handed out to insiders would be more likely to rise quickly, supplying bigger first-day rewards for the chosen few. So instead of Bullshit.com opening at $20, the bank would approach the Bullshit.com CEO and offer him a million shares of his own company at $18 in exchange for future business — effectively robbing all of Bullshit’s new shareholders by diverting cash that should have gone to the company’s bottom line into the private bank account of the company’s CEO.

    In one case, Goldman allegedly gave a multimillion-dollar special offering to eBay CEO Meg Whitman, who later joined Goldman’s board, in exchange for future i-banking business. According to a report by the House Financial Services Committee in 2002, Goldman gave special stock offerings to executives in 21 companies that it took public, including Yahoo! cofounder Jerry Yang and two of the great slithering villains of the financial-scandal age — Tyco’s Dennis Kozlowski and Enron’s Ken Lay. Goldman angrily denounced the report as “an egregious distortion of the facts” — shortly before paying $110 million to settle an investigation into spinning and other manipulations launched by New York state regulators. “The spinning of hot IPO shares was not a harmless corporate perk,” then-attorney general Eliot Spitzer said at the time. “Instead, it was an integral part of a fraudulent scheme to win new investment-banking business.”

    Such practices conspired to turn the Internet bubble into one of the greatest financial disasters in world history: Some $5 trillion of wealth was wiped out on the NASDAQ alone. But the real problem wasn’t the money that was lost by shareholders, it was the money gained by investment bankers, who received hefty bonuses for tampering with the market. Instead of teaching Wall Street a lesson that bubbles always deflate, the Internet years demonstrated to bankers that in the age of freely flowing capital and publicly owned financial companies, bubbles are incredibly easy to inflate, and individual bonuses are actually bigger when the mania and the irrationality are greater.

    Nowhere was this truer than at Goldman. Between 1999 and 2002, the firm paid out $28.5 billion in compensation and benefits — an average of roughly $350,000 a year per employee. Those numbers are important because the key legacy of the Internet boom is that the economy is now driven in large part by the pursuit of the enormous salaries and bonuses that such bubbles make possible. Goldman’s mantra of “long-term greedy” vanished into thin air as the game became about getting your check before the melon hit the pavement.

    The market was no longer a rationally managed place to grow real, profitable businesses: It was a huge ocean of Someone Else’s Money where bankers hauled in vast sums through whatever means necessary and tried to convert that money into bonuses and payouts as quickly as possible. If you laddered and spun 50 Internet IPOs that went bust within a year, so what? By the time the Securities and Exchange Commission got around to fining your firm $110 million, the yacht you bought with your IPO bonuses was already six years old. Besides, you were probably out of Goldman by then, running the U.S. Treasury or maybe the state of New Jersey. (One of the truly comic moments in the history of America’s recent financial collapse came when Gov. Jon Corzine of New Jersey, who ran Goldman from 1994 to 1999 and left with $320 million in IPO-fattened stock, insisted in 2002 that “I’ve never even heard the term ‘laddering’ before.”)

    For a bank that paid out $7 billion a year in salaries, $110 million fines issued half a decade late were something far less than a deterrent —they were a joke. Once the Internet bubble burst, Goldman had no incentive to reassess its new, profit-driven strategy; it just searched around for another bubble to inflate. As it turns out, it had one ready, thanks in large part to Rubin.

    BUBBLE #3 The Housing Craze

    Goldman’s role in the sweeping global disaster that was the housing bubble is not hard to trace. Here again, the basic trick was a decline in underwriting standards, although in this case the standards weren’t in IPOs but in mortgages. By now almost everyone knows that for decades mortgage dealers insisted that home buyers be able to produce a down payment of 10 percent or more, show a steady income and good credit rating, and possess a real first and last name. Then, at the dawn of the new millennium, they suddenly threw all that shit out the window and started writing mortgages on the backs of napkins to cocktail waitresses and ex-cons carrying five bucks and a Snickers bar.

    None of that would have been possible without investment bankers like Goldman, who created vehicles to package those shitty mortgages and sell them en masse to unsuspecting insurance companies and pension funds. This created a mass market for toxic debt that would never have existed before; in the old days, no bank would have wanted to keep some addict ex-con’s mortgage on its books, knowing how likely it was to fail. You can’t write these mortgages, in other words, unless you can sell them to someone who doesn’t know what they are.

    Goldman used two methods to hide the mess they were selling. First, they bundled hundreds of different mortgages into instruments called Collateralized Debt Obligations. Then they sold investors on the idea that, because a bunch of those mortgages would turn out to be OK, there was no reason to worry so much about the shitty ones: The CDO, as a whole, was sound. Thus, junk-rated mortgages were turned into AAA-rated investments. Second, to hedge its own bets, Goldman got companies like AIG to provide insurance — known as credit default swaps — on the CDOs. The swaps were essentially a racetrack bet between AIG and Goldman: Goldman is betting the ex-cons will default, AIG is betting they won’t.

    There was only one problem with the deals: All of the wheeling and dealing represented exactly the kind of dangerous speculation that federal regulators are supposed to rein in. Derivatives like CDOs and credit swaps had already caused a series of serious financial calamities: Procter & Gamble and Gibson Greetings both lost fortunes, and Orange County, California, was forced to default in 1994. A report that year by the Government Accountability Office recommended that such financial instruments be tightly regulated — and in 1998, the head of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, a woman named Brooksley Born, agreed. That May, she circulated a letter to business leaders and the Clinton administration suggesting that banks be required to provide greater disclosure in derivatives trades, and maintain reserves to cushion against losses.

    More regulation wasn’t exactly what Goldman had in mind. “The banks go crazy — they want it stopped,” says Michael Greenberger, who worked for Born as director of trading and markets at the CFTC and is now a law professor at the University of Maryland. “Greenspan, Summers, Rubin and [SEC chief Arthur] Levitt want it stopped.”

    Clinton’s reigning economic foursome — “especially Rubin,” according to Greenberger — called Born in for a meeting and pleaded their case. She refused to back down, however, and continued to push for more regulation of the derivatives. Then, in June 1998, Rubin went public to denounce her move, eventually recommending that Congress strip the CFTC of its regulatory authority. In 2000, on its last day in session, Congress passed the now-notorious Commodity Futures Modernization Act, which had been inserted into an 11,000-page spending bill at the last minute, with almost no debate on the floor of the Senate. Banks were now free to trade default swaps with impunity.

    But the story didn’t end there. AIG, a major purveyor of default swaps, approached the New York State Insurance Department in 2000 and asked whether default swaps would be regulated as insurance. At the time, the office was run by one Neil Levin, a former Goldman vice president, who decided against regulating the swaps. Now freed to underwrite as many housing-based securities and buy as much credit-default protection as it wanted, Goldman went berserk with lending lust. By the peak of the housing boom in 2006, Goldman was underwriting $76.5 billion worth of mortgage-backed securities — a third of which were sub-prime — much of it to institutional investors like pensions and insurance companies. And in these massive issues of real estate were vast swamps of crap.

    Take one $494 million issue that year, GSAMP Trust 2006S3. Many of the mortgages belonged to second-mortgage borrowers, and the average equity they had in their homes was 0.71 percent. Moreover, 58 percent of the loans included little or no documentation — no names of the borrowers, no addresses of the homes, just zip codes. Yet both of the major ratings agencies, Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s, rated 93 percent of the issue as investment grade. Moody’s projected that less than 10 percent of the loans would default. In reality, 18 percent of the mortgages were in default within 18 months.

    Not that Goldman was personally at any risk. The bank might be taking all these hideous, completely irresponsible mortgages from beneath-gangster-status firms like Countrywide and selling them off to municipalities and pensioners — old people, for God’s sake — pretending the whole time that it wasn’t grade D horseshit. But even as it was doing so, it was taking short positions in the same market, in essence betting against the same crap it was selling. Even worse, Goldman bragged about it in public. “The mortgage sector continues to be challenged,” David Viniar, the bank’s chief financial officer, boasted in 2007. “As a result, we took significant markdowns on our long inventory positions … However, our risk bias in that market was to be short, and that net short position was profitable.” In other words, the mortgages it was selling were for chumps. The real money was in betting against those same mortgages.

    “That’s how audacious these assholes are,” says one hedge fund manager. “At least with other banks, you could say that they were just dumb — they believed what they were selling, and it blew them up. Goldman knew what it was doing.”

    I ask the manager how it could be that selling something to customers that you’re actually betting against — particularly when you know more about the weaknesses of those products than the customer — doesn’t amount to securities fraud.

    “It’s exactly securities fraud,” he says. “It’s the heart of securities fraud.”

    Eventually, lots of aggrieved investors agreed. In a virtual repeat of the Internet IPO craze, Goldman was hit with a wave of lawsuits after the collapse of the housing bubble, many of which accused the bank of withholding pertinent information about the quality of the mortgages it issued. New York state regulators are suing Goldman and 25 other underwriters for selling bundles of crappy Countrywide mortgages to city and state pension funds, which lost as much as $100 million in the investments. Massachusetts also investigated Goldman for similar misdeeds, acting on behalf of 714 mortgage holders who got stuck holding predatory loans. But once again, Goldman got off virtually scot-free, staving off prosecution by agreeing to pay a paltry $60 million — about what the bank’s CDO division made in a day and a half during the real estate boom.

    The effects of the housing bubble are well known — it led more or less directly to the collapse of Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers and AIG, whose toxic portfolio of credit swaps was in significant part composed of the insurance that banks like Goldman bought against their own housing portfolios. In fact, at least $13 billion of the taxpayer money given to AIG in the bailout ultimately went to Goldman, meaning that the bank made out on the housing bubble twice: It fucked the investors who bought their horseshit CDOs by betting against its own crappy product, then it turned around and fucked the taxpayer by making him pay off those same bets.

    And once again, while the world was crashing down all around the bank, Goldman made sure it was doing just fine in the compensation department. In 2006, the firm’s payroll jumped to $16.5 billion — an average of $622,000 per employee. As a Goldman spokesman explained, “We work very hard here.”

    But the best was yet to come. While the collapse of the housing bubble sent most of the financial world fleeing for the exits, or to jail, Goldman boldly doubled down — and almost single-handedly created yet another bubble, one the world still barely knows the firm had anything to do with.

    BUBBLE #4 $4 a Gallon

    By the beginning of 2008, the financial world was in turmoil. Wall Street had spent the past two and a half decades producing one scandal after another, which didn’t leave much to sell that wasn’t tainted. The terms junk bond, IPO, sub-prime mortgage and other once-hot financial fare were now firmly associated in the public’s mind with scams; the terms credit swaps and CDOs were about to join them. The credit markets were in crisis, and the mantra that had sustained the fantasy economy throughout the Bush years — the notion that housing prices never go down — was now a fully exploded myth, leaving the Street clamoring for a new bullshit paradigm to sling.

    Where to go? With the public reluctant to put money in anything that felt like a paper investment, the Street quietly moved the casino to the physical-commodities market — stuff you could touch: corn, coffee, cocoa, wheat and, above all, energy commodities, especially oil. In conjunction with a decline in the dollar, the credit crunch and the housing crash caused a “flight to commodities.” Oil futures in particular skyrocketed, as the price of a single barrel went from around $60 in the middle of 2007 to a high of $147 in the summer of 2008.

    That summer, as the presidential campaign heated up, the accepted explanation for why gasoline had hit $4.11 a gallon was that there was a problem with the world oil supply. In a classic example of how Republicans and Democrats respond to crises by engaging in fierce exchanges of moronic irrelevancies, John McCain insisted that ending the moratorium on offshore drilling would be “very helpful in the short term,” while Barack Obama in typical liberal-arts yuppie style argued that federal investment in hybrid cars was the way out.

    But it was all a lie. While the global supply of oil will eventually dry up, the short-term flow has actually been increasing. In the six months before prices spiked, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, the world oil supply rose from 85.24 million barrels a day to 85.72 million. Over the same period, world oil demand dropped from 86.82 million barrels a day to 86.07 million. Not only was the short-term supply of oil rising, the demand for it was falling — which, in classic economic terms, should have brought prices at the pump down.

    So what caused the huge spike in oil prices? Take a wild guess. Obviously Goldman had help — there were other players in the physical commodities market — but the root cause had almost everything to do with the behavior of a few powerful actors determined to turn the once-solid market into a speculative casino. Goldman did it by persuading pension funds and other large institutional investors to invest in oil futures — agreeing to buy oil at a certain price on a fixed date. The push transformed oil from a physical commodity, rigidly subject to supply and demand, into something to bet on, like a stock. Between 2003 and 2008, the amount of speculative money in commodities grew from $13 billion to $317 billion, an increase of 2,300 percent. By 2008, a barrel of oil was traded 27 times, on average, before it was actually delivered and consumed.

    As is so often the case, there had been a Depression-era law in place designed specifically to prevent this sort of thing. The commodities market was designed in large part to help farmers: A grower concerned about future price drops could enter into a contract to sell his corn at a certain price for delivery later on, which made him worry less about building up stores of his crop. When no one was buying corn, the farmer could sell to a middleman known as a “traditional speculator,” who would store the grain and sell it later, when demand returned. That way, someone was always there to buy from the farmer, even when the market temporarily had no need for his crops.

    In 1936, however, Congress recognized that there should never be more speculators in the market than real producers and consumers. If that happened, prices would be affected by something other than supply and demand, and price manipulations would ensue. A new law empowered the Commodity Futures Trading Commission — the very same body that would later try and fail to regulate credit swaps — to place limits on speculative trades in commodities. As a result of the CFTC’s oversight, peace and harmony reigned in the commodities markets for more than 50 years.

    All that changed in 1991 when, unbeknownst to almost everyone in the world, a Goldman-owned commodities-trading subsidiary called J. Aron wrote to the CFTC and made an unusual argument. Farmers with big stores of corn, Goldman argued, weren’t the only ones who needed to hedge their risk against future price drops — Wall Street dealers who made big bets on oil prices also needed to hedge their risk, because, well, they stood to lose a lot too.

    This was complete and utter crap — the 1936 law, remember, was specifically designed to maintain distinctions between people who were buying and selling real tangible stuff and people who were trading in paper alone. But the CFTC, amazingly, bought Goldman’s argument. It issued the bank a free pass, called the “Bona Fide Hedging” exemption, allowing Goldman’s subsidiary to call itself a physical hedger and escape virtually all limits placed on speculators. In the years that followed, the commission would quietly issue 14 similar exemptions to other companies.

    Now Goldman and other banks were free to drive more investors into the commodities markets, enabling speculators to place increasingly big bets. That 1991 letter from Goldman more or less directly led to the oil bubble in 2008, when the number of speculators in the market — driven there by fear of the falling dollar and the housing crash — finally overwhelmed the real physical suppliers and consumers. By 2008, at least three quarters of the activity on the commodity exchanges was speculative, according to a congressional staffer who studied the numbers — and that’s likely a conservative estimate. By the middle of last summer, despite rising supply and a drop in demand, we were paying $4 a gallon every time we pulled up to the pump.

    What is even more amazing is that the letter to Goldman, along with most of the other trading exemptions, was handed out more or less in secret. “I was the head of the division of trading and markets, and Brooksley Born was the chair of the CFTC,” says Greenberger, “and neither of us knew this letter was out there.” In fact, the letters only came to light by accident. Last year, a staffer for the House Energy and Commerce Committee just happened to be at a briefing when officials from the CFTC made an offhand reference to the exemptions.

    “I had been invited to a briefing the commission was holding on energy,” the staffer recounts. “And suddenly in the middle of it, they start saying, ‘Yeah, we’ve been issuing these letters for years now.’ I raised my hand and said, ‘Really? You issued a letter? Can I see it?’ And they were like, ‘Duh, duh.’ So we went back and forth, and finally they said, ‘We have to clear it with Goldman Sachs.’ I’m like, ‘What do you mean, you have to clear it with Goldman Sachs?'”

    The CFTC cited a rule that prohibited it from releasing any information about a company’s current position in the market. But the staffer’s request was about a letter that had been issued 17 years earlier. It no longer had anything to do with Goldman’s current position. What’s more, Section 7 of the 1936 commodities law gives Congress the right to any information it wants from the commission. Still, in a classic example of how complete Goldman’s capture of government is, the CFTC waited until it got clearance from the bank before it turned the letter over.

    Armed with the semi-secret government exemption, Goldman had become the chief designer of a giant commodities betting parlor. Its Goldman Sachs Commodities Index — which tracks the prices of 24 major commodities but is overwhelmingly weighted toward oil — became the place where pension funds and insurance companies and other institutional investors could make massive long-term bets on commodity prices. Which was all well and good, except for a couple of things. One was that index speculators are mostly “long only” bettors, who seldom if ever take short positions — meaning they only bet on prices to rise. While this kind of behavior is good for a stock market, it’s terrible for commodities, because it continually forces prices upward. “If index speculators took short positions as well as long ones, you’d see them pushing prices both up and down,” says Michael Masters, a hedge fund manager who has helped expose the role of investment banks in the manipulation of oil prices. “But they only push prices in one direction: up.”

    Complicating matters even further was the fact that Goldman itself was cheerleading with all its might for an increase in oil prices. In the beginning of 2008, Arjun Murti, a Goldman analyst, hailed as an “oracle of oil” by The New York Times, predicted a “super spike” in oil prices, forecasting a rise to $200 a barrel. At the time Goldman was heavily invested in oil through its commodities trading subsidiary, J. Aron; it also owned a stake in a major oil refinery in Kansas, where it warehoused the crude it bought and sold. Even though the supply of oil was keeping pace with demand, Murti continually warned of disruptions to the world oil supply, going so far as to broadcast the fact that he owned two hybrid cars. High prices, the bank insisted, were somehow the fault of the piggish American consumer; in 2005, Goldman analysts insisted that we wouldn’t know when oil prices would fall until we knew “when American consumers will stop buying gas-guzzling sport utility vehicles and instead seek fuel-efficient alternatives.”

    But it wasn’t the consumption of real oil that was driving up prices — it was the trade in paper oil. By the summer of 2008, in fact, commodities speculators had bought and stockpiled enough oil futures to fill 1.1 billion barrels of crude, which meant that speculators owned more future oil on paper than there was real, physical oil stored in all of the country’s commercial storage tanks and the Strategic Petroleum Reserve combined. It was a repeat of both the Internet craze and the housing bubble, when Wall Street jacked up present-day profits by selling suckers shares of a fictional fantasy future of endlessly rising prices.

    In what was by now a painfully familiar pattern, the oil-commodities melon hit the pavement hard in the summer of 2008, causing a massive loss of wealth; crude prices plunged from $147 to $33. Once again the big losers were ordinary people. The pensioners whose funds invested in this crap got massacred: CalPERS, the California Public Employees’ Retirement System, had $1.1 billion in commodities when the crash came. And the damage didn’t just come from oil. Soaring food prices driven by the commodities bubble led to catastrophes across the planet, forcing an estimated 100 million people into hunger and sparking food riots throughout the Third World.

    Now oil prices are rising again: They shot up 20 percent in the month of May and have nearly doubled so far this year. Once again, the problem is not supply or demand. “The highest supply of oil in the last 20 years is now,” says Rep. Bart Stupak, a Democrat from Michigan who serves on the House energy committee. “Demand is at a 10-year low. And yet prices are up.”

    Asked why politicians continue to harp on things like drilling or hybrid cars, when supply and demand have nothing to do with the high prices, Stupak shakes his head. “I think they just don’t understand the problem very well,” he says. “You can’t explain it in 30 seconds, so politicians ignore it.”

    BUBBLE #5 Rigging the Bailout

    After the oil bubble collapsed last fall, there was no new bubble to keep things humming — this time, the money seems to be really gone, like worldwide-depression gone. So the financial safari has moved elsewhere, and the big game in the hunt has become the only remaining pool of dumb, unguarded capital left to feed upon: taxpayer money. Here, in the biggest bailout in history, is where Goldman Sachs really started to flex its muscle.

    It began in September of last year, when then-Treasury secretary Paulson made a momentous series of decisions. Although he had already engineered a rescue of Bear Stearns a few months before and helped bail out quasi-private lenders Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, Paulson elected to let Lehman Brothers — one of Goldman’s last real competitors — collapse without intervention. (“Goldman’s superhero status was left intact,” says market analyst Eric Salzman, “and an investment banking competitor, Lehman, goes away.”) The very next day, Paulson green-lighted a massive, $85 billion bailout of AIG, which promptly turned around and repaid $13 billion it owed to Goldman. Thanks to the rescue effort, the bank ended up getting paid in full for its bad bets: By contrast, retired auto workers awaiting the Chrysler bailout will be lucky to receive 50 cents for every dollar they are owed.

    Immediately after the AIG bailout, Paulson announced his federal bailout for the financial industry, a $700 billion plan called the Troubled Asset Relief Program, and put a heretofore unknown 35-year-old Goldman banker named Neel Kashkari in charge of administering the funds. In order to qualify for bailout monies, Goldman announced that it would convert from an investment bank to a bank holding company, a move that allows it access not only to $10 billion in TARP funds, but to a whole galaxy of less conspicuous, publicly backed funding — most notably, lending from the discount window of the Federal Reserve. By the end of March, the Fed will have lent or guaranteed at least $8.7 trillion under a series of new bailout programs — and thanks to an obscure law allowing the Fed to block most congressional audits, both the amounts and the recipients of the monies remain almost entirely secret.

    Converting to a bank-holding company has other benefits as well: Goldman’s primary supervisor is now the New York Fed, whose chairman at the time of its announcement was Stephen Friedman, a former co-chairman of Goldman Sachs. Friedman was technically in violation of Federal Reserve policy by remaining on the board of Goldman even as he was supposedly regulating the bank; in order to rectify the problem, he applied for, and got, a conflict of interest waiver from the government. Friedman was also supposed to divest himself of his Goldman stock after Goldman became a bank holding company, but thanks to the waiver, he was allowed to go out and buy 52,000 additional shares in his old bank, leaving him $3 million richer. Friedman stepped down in May, but the man now in charge of supervising Goldman — New York Fed president William Dudley — is yet another former Goldmanite.

    The collective message of all this — the AIG bailout, the swift approval for its bank holding conversion, the TARP funds — is that when it comes to Goldman Sachs, there isn’t a free market at all. The government might let other players on the market die, but it simply will not allow Goldman to fail under any circumstances. Its edge in the market has suddenly become an open declaration of supreme privilege. “In the past it was an implicit advantage,” says Simon Johnson, an economics professor at MIT and former official at the International Monetary Fund, who compares the bailout to the crony capitalism he has seen in Third World countries. “Now it’s more of an explicit advantage.”

    Once the bailouts were in place, Goldman went right back to business as usual, dreaming up impossibly convoluted schemes to pick the American carcass clean of its loose capital. One of its first moves in the post-bailout era was to quietly push forward the calendar it uses to report its earnings, essentially wiping December 2008 — with its $1.3 billion in pretax losses — off the books. At the same time, the bank announced a highly suspicious $1.8 billion profit for the first quarter of 2009 — which apparently included a large chunk of money funneled to it by taxpayers via the AIG bailout. “They cooked those first quarter results six ways from Sunday,” says one hedge fund manager. “They hid the losses in the orphan month and called the bailout money profit.”

    Two more numbers stand out from that stunning first-quarter turnaround. The bank paid out an astonishing $4.7 billion in bonuses and compensation in the first three months of this year, an 18 percent increase over the first quarter of 2008. It also raised $5 billion by issuing new shares almost immediately after releasing its first quarter results. Taken together, the numbers show that Goldman essentially borrowed a $5 billion salary payout for its executives in the middle of the global economic crisis it helped cause, using half-baked accounting to reel in investors, just months after receiving billions in a taxpayer bailout.

    Even more amazing, Goldman did it all right before the government announced the results of its new “stress test” for banks seeking to repay TARP money — suggesting that Goldman knew exactly what was coming. The government was trying to carefully orchestrate the repayments in an effort to prevent further trouble at banks that couldn’t pay back the money right away. But Goldman blew off those concerns, brazenly flaunting its insider status. “They seemed to know everything that they needed to do before the stress test came out, unlike everyone else, who had to wait until after,” says Michael Hecht, a managing director of JMP Securities. “The government came out and said, ‘To pay back TARP, you have to issue debt of at least five years that is not insured by FDIC — which Goldman Sachs had already done, a week or two before.”

    And here’s the real punch line. After playing an intimate role in four historic bubble catastrophes, after helping $5 trillion in wealth disappear from the NASDAQ, after pawning off thousands of toxic mortgages on pensioners and cities, after helping to drive the price of gas up to $4 a gallon and to push 100 million people around the world into hunger, after securing tens of billions of taxpayer dollars through a series of bailouts overseen by its former CEO, what did Goldman Sachs give back to the people of the United States in 2008?

    Fourteen million dollars.

    That is what the firm paid in taxes in 2008, an effective tax rate of exactly one, read it, one percent. The bank paid out $10 billion in compensation and benefits that same year and made a profit of more than $2 billion — yet it paid the Treasury less than a third of what it forked over to CEO Lloyd Blankfein, who made $42.9 million last year.

    How is this possible? According to Goldman’s annual report, the low taxes are due in large part to changes in the bank’s “geographic earnings mix.” In other words, the bank moved its money around so that most of its earnings took place in foreign countries with low tax rates. Thanks to our completely fucked corporate tax system, companies like Goldman can ship their revenues offshore and defer taxes on those revenues indefinitely, even while they claim deductions upfront on that same untaxed income. This is why any corporation with an at least occasionally sober accountant can usually find a way to zero out its taxes. A GAO report, in fact, found that between 1998 and 2005, roughly two-thirds of all corporations operating in the U.S. paid no taxes at all.

    This should be a pitchfork-level outrage — but somehow, when Goldman released its post-bailout tax profile, hardly anyone said a word. One of the few to remark on the obscenity was Rep. Lloyd Doggett, a Democrat from Texas who serves on the House Ways and Means Committee. “With the right hand out begging for bailout money,” he said, “the left is hiding it offshore.”

    BUBBLE #6 Global Warming

    Fast-forward to today. It’s early June in Washington, D.C. Barack Obama, a popular young politician whose leading private campaign donor was an investment bank called Goldman Sachs — its employees paid some $981,000 to his campaign — sits in the White House. Having seamlessly navigated the political minefield of the bailout era, Goldman is once again back to its old business, scouting out loopholes in a new government-created market with the aid of a new set of alumni occupying key government jobs.

    Gone are Hank Paulson and Neel Kashkari; in their place are Treasury chief of staff Mark Patterson and CFTC chief Gary Gensler, both former Goldmanites. (Gensler was the firm’s co-head of finance.) And instead of credit derivatives or oil futures or mortgage-backed CDOs, the new game in town, the next bubble, is in carbon credits — a booming trillion dollar market that barely even exists yet, but will if the Democratic Party that it gave $4,452,585 to in the last election manages to push into existence a groundbreaking new commodities bubble, disguised as an “environmental plan,” called cap-and-trade.

    The new carbon credit market is a virtual repeat of the commodities-market casino that’s been kind to Goldman, except it has one delicious new wrinkle: If the plan goes forward as expected, the rise in prices will be government-mandated. Goldman won’t even have to rig the game. It will be rigged in advance.

    Here’s how it works: If the bill passes, there will be limits for coal plants, utilities, natural-gas distributors and numerous other industries on the amount of carbon emissions (a.k.a. greenhouse gases) they can produce per year. If the companies go over their allotment, they will be able to buy “allocations” or credits from other companies that have managed to produce fewer emissions. President Obama conservatively estimates that about $646 billion worth of carbon credits will be auctioned in the first seven years; one of his top economic aides speculates that the real number might be twice or even three times that amount.

    The feature of this plan that has special appeal to speculators is that the “cap” on carbon will be continually lowered by the government, which means that carbon credits will become more and more scarce with each passing year. Which means that this is a brand new commodities market where the main commodity to be traded is guaranteed to rise in price over time. The volume of this new market will be upwards of a trillion dollars annually; for comparison’s sake, the annual combined revenues of all electricity suppliers in the U.S. total $320 billion.

    Goldman wants this bill. The plan is (1) to get in on the ground floor of paradigm-shifting legislation, (2) make sure that they’re the profit-making slice of that paradigm and (3) make sure the slice is a big slice. Goldman started pushing hard for cap-and-trade long ago, but things really ramped up last year when the firm spent $3.5 million to lobby climate issues. (One of their lobbyists at the time was none other than Patterson, now Treasury chief of staff.) Back in 2005, when Hank Paulson was chief of Goldman, he personally helped author the bank’s environmental policy, a document that contains some surprising elements for a firm that in all other areas has been consistently opposed to any sort of government regulation. Paulson’s report argued that “voluntary action alone cannot solve the climate change problem.” A few years later, the bank’s carbon chief, Ken Newcombe, insisted that cap-and-trade alone won’t be enough to fix the climate problem and called for further public investments in research and development. Which is convenient, considering that Goldman made early investments in wind power (it bought a subsidiary called Horizon Wind Energy), renewable diesel (it is an investor in a firm called Changing World Technologies) and solar power (it partnered with BP Solar), exactly the kind of deals that will prosper if the government forces energy producers to use cleaner energy. As Paulson said at the time, “We’re not making those investments to lose money.”

    The bank owns a 10 percent stake in the Chicago Climate Exchange, where the carbon credits will be traded. Moreover, Goldman owns a minority stake in Blue Source LLC, a Utah-based firm that sells carbon credits of the type that will be in great demand if the bill passes. Nobel Prize winner Al Gore, who is intimately involved with the planning of cap-and-trade, started up a company called Generation Investment Management with three former bigwigs from Goldman Sachs Asset Management, David Blood, Mark Ferguson and Peter Harris. Their business? Investing in carbon offsets. There’s also a $500 million Green Growth Fund set up by a Goldmanite to invest in green-tech … the list goes on and on. Goldman is ahead of the headlines again, just waiting for someone to make it rain in the right spot. Will this market be bigger than the energy futures market?

    “Oh, it’ll dwarf it,” says a former staffer on the House energy committee.

    Well, you might say, who cares? If cap-and-trade succeeds, won’t we all be saved from the catastrophe of global warming? Maybe — but cap-and-trade, as envisioned by Goldman, is really just a carbon tax structured so that private interests collect the revenues. Instead of simply imposing a fixed government levy on carbon pollution and forcing unclean energy producers to pay for the mess they make, cap-and-trade will allow a small tribe of greedy-as-hell Wall Street swine to turn yet another commodities market into a private tax collection scheme. This is worse than the bailout: It allows the bank to seize taxpayer money before it’s even collected.

    “If it’s going to be a tax, I would prefer that Washington set the tax and collect it,” says Michael Masters, the hedge fund director who spoke out against oil futures speculation. “But we’re saying that Wall Street can set the tax, and Wall Street can collect the tax. That’s the last thing in the world I want. It’s just asinine.”

    Cap-and-trade is going to happen. Or, if it doesn’t, something like it will. The moral is the same as for all the other bubbles that Goldman helped create, from 1929 to 2009. In almost every case, the very same bank that behaved recklessly for years, weighing down the system with toxic loans and predatory debt, and accomplishing nothing but massive bonuses for a few bosses, has been rewarded with mountains of virtually free money and government guarantees — while the actual victims in this mess, ordinary taxpayers, are the ones paying for it.

    It’s not always easy to accept the reality of what we now routinely allow these people to get away with; there’s a kind of collective denial that kicks in when a country goes through what America has gone through lately, when a people lose as much prestige and status as we have in the past few years. You can’t really register the fact that you’re no longer a citizen of a thriving first-world democracy, that you’re no longer above getting robbed in broad daylight, because like an amputee, you can still sort of feel things that are no longer there.

    But this is it. This is the world we live in now. And in this world, some of us have to play by the rules, while others get a note from the principal excusing them from homework till the end of time, plus 10 billion free dollars in a paper bag to buy lunch. It’s a gangster state, running on gangster economics, and even prices can’t be trusted anymore; there are hidden taxes in every buck you pay. And maybe we can’t stop it, but we should at least know where it’s all going.

    This article originally appeared in the July 9-23, 2009 of Rolling Stone.

    https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/the-great-american-bubble-machine-195229/
  580. @Bashibuzuk
    @Emil Nikola Richard

    I respectfully disagree.

    Gurdjieff, just like some Gnostics before him (see what's left of the Gospel of Mary Magdalen), asserted that a person not awakened to their ultimate nature (through the Work in Gurdjieff's terms or through Gnosis in the Gnostic scriptures) cannot survive death. In fact, such a person is already dead although they could carry on living (and suffering) in purely biological (Gurdjieff would rather say mechanical) terms. Such a person is somewhat of a Baudrillard's zombie. They would have no Divine Light inside, no Buddha Nature, no Fitrah, perhaps no Consciousness at all. This type of person would be an irredeemable Icchantika that cannot be Awaken and even less so Enlightened.



    But any of Gurdjieff's disciples supposedly was exactly such a person before his Work led them to a Crystallization of their True Self. So where did the urge to Work and Crystallize come from? Ex nihilo nihil... Therefore something spiritually alive must have been there to urge the person to accomplish Work and to attain Greatness.

    What was is it if not our True Self, indeed God himself working through our psyche and guiding us in mysterious ways?

    Therefore, God did not create people so they would not transcend death without some arcane spiritual discipline. God did not deprive anyone of a spiritual nature to freely perfect oneself. God did not separate his creatures into perfectible ones and the ones damned to annihilation.

    Gurdjieff's Theodicy is a typical Gnostic one, they could not see this World as a Creation of a truly benevolent and perfect God. And I can see why, for with all the suffering and evil around us, it is the logical thing to believe: this World is imperfect because it has been created by an imperfect Demiurge and Creation is in fact an error.

    However, the World is just imperfect enough so we can eventually evolve towards perfection in our own minds and work to make this Realm a better place for at least our beloved ones, perhaps even our neighbors and in the best case scenario even some distant strangers.

    This World allows us to become better people. God created it that way to allow for everything and everyone to evolve towards Him and perfect All into His Perfection in a final Theosis. This takes time, one existence is usually not enough, some keep on their evolution after death, others have to come back to learn more, a few among us reach a level that allows for their graduation from this Realm into a higher level closer to Godhood.

    As Sufis say there are spiritual stages and stands, but I believe God loves us all.

    For God is Good.

    I am with Origen who assets that even Satan will eventually be saved. I am with Dogen Zenji who promised that even mountains and rivers will be Awakened and Enlightened. I am with Theillard de Chardin and Sufi saints who believe that ultimately only God will remain.

    Until then let the Cross of Change roll, let the Wheel of Samsara spin and let our ancestors be reborn through our offspring in an never-ending knot.

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/3a/Muzeum_Archeologiczne_i_Etnograficzne_w_%C5%81odzi_12.jpg/1280px-Muzeum_Archeologiczne_i_Etnograficzne_w_%C5%81odzi_12.jpg

    This is my subjective take on Theodicy.

    Replies: @Barbarossa

    They would have no Divine Light inside, no Buddha Nature, no Fitrah, perhaps no Consciousness at all. This type of person would be an irredeemable Icchantika that cannot be Awaken and even less so Enlightened.

    I would say that this state can also be termed Hell. We are not put into Hell, but we are fully capable of putting ourselves there, though it takes some work. God never turns away from us, but we are fully capable of rejecting God and if this is done in a systematic enough way we create a willful separation from the Divine. Such a person may become worse than an animal, as the Divine nature twisted inside of them will invent perversions of creation that no lower animal is capable of.

    But I have to agree with you that in the end even these will be unable to deny the power of the essential Divine Reality.

    • Replies: @Bashibuzuk
    @Barbarossa

    We cannot detach from God. God is the ground of being on which our existences unfold. The best argument for God's being (as distinguished from our existence) that I ever read was perhaps the following Ismaili blog post:

    https://ismailignosis.com/2014/03/27/he-who-is-above-all-else-the-strongest-argument-for-the-existence-of-god/

    It is exceptional in that it is entirely aligned with classical Greek philosophy. This is of course not surprising, given that Ismaili were originally Islamic Neoplatonicists.

    Now, they should have not used the word "existence" instead of "being" when writing about God. Existence is always being in relation to and outside of something else. God is, while his Creation exists. But that's semantics for the majority of people anyways.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

  581. @songbird
    Is this guy a crank, or onto something?

    https://youtu.be/2bm5ivctdB4

    BTW, I once thought it would be a great idea to have a horror movie explain why the Vikings disappeared from the Azores.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

    Thanks for this video.

    https://archaeology-world.com/sunken-atlantis-pyramid-discovered-off-azores-coast-in-portugal/

    The location of Azores fits well with Plato’s Atlantis description.

    • Thanks: songbird
    • Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Bashibuzuk

    It doesn't fit with plate tectonics though. The mid Atlantic ridge is supposed to be rising not sinking. You aren't supposed to entertain this idea in public but plate tectonics is only a theory.

    https://www.elsevier.com/books/the-expanding-earth/carey/978-0-444-41485-4

  582. @Sean
    @Mikhail


    Macgregor still not as off the wall as Hodges
     
    Hodges said before the invasion that the Russians would be unable to take Kiev, and he was right. Just like Mearshiemer was about Russia being fated to attack Ukraine unless it had a nuclear deterent .

    In 2015, Russia wasn’t as strong
     
    They had the psychological momentum. The Ukrainian officers were not leading effectively in 2015; that has changed. In his TedX talk of six years ago, Hodges says Lt. Eric Wood (who fought to the death during the Battle of the Bulge on his own initiative ) and Joshua Chamberlain epitomised what is expected of an officer, and that kind of ethos was inculcated into the Ukrainan armed forces. The standing orders were to fight and not retreat unless authorised to do so. There is a lot more surveillance of commanders and other officials by the very numerous Ukrainian security police too. Putin wanted to reprise his Crimea production as if Ukraine had not taken remedial measures to ensure there could be not repitition. As John Gray says Putin is not a military man https://youtu.be/uOYW82PQjzQ?t=1547

    Replies: @Mikhail

    Hodges said before the invasion that the Russians would be unable to take Kiev, and he was right. Just like Mearshiemer was about Russia being fated to attack Ukraine unless it had a nuclear deterent .

    Before the 2/24/22 SMO, I didn’t believe the Russians would try to take Kiev in the event of their pursuing military action in the former Ukrainian SSR. Based on what has transpired, that wasn’t part of the SMO.

    Along with Hodges’ comment about the Kiev regime retaking Crimea within the last 12 months, he absurdly claimed that Ukrainians and not Russians beat back the Nazis.

    Concerning Mearsheimer:

    https://strategic-culture.org/news/2019/08/21/getting-real-with-the-us-foreign-policy-establishment-realists/

    Excerpt –

    On the subject of Russia and Ukraine, I’m reminded of a September 5, 2014 PBS NewsHour segment, where noted foreign policy realist John Mearsheimer said: “The Russians have made it very clear that they’re not going to tolerate a situation where Ukraine forms an alliance with NATO, the principle reason that Russia is now in Ukraine and trying to wreck Ukraine.

    And let’s be clear here. Why Russia is trying to wreck Ukraine, is because Russia doesn’t want Ukraine to become part of the West. It doesn’t want it to be integrated into NATO or the EU. And if we follow the prescriptions that Bill and I know Mike favors as well, what we are going to end up doing is further antagonizing Putin. He is going to play more hardball. And the end result is that Ukraine is going to be wrecked as a country, and we’re going to have terrible relations between Russia and the West, which is not in Russia’s interest and not in our interest.”

    At a University of Chicago event, Mearsheimer also singles out Russia as seeking to “wreck” Ukraine. He doesn’t use that word to characterize Western actions. Hence, his usage comes across as disproportionate and puzzling. (Offhand, I don’t recall Mearsheimer using a word like “wreck” to describe US actions in Yugoslavia, Iraq and Libya.) When compared to Russia, Mearsheimer has said that he finds more fault with the Western stances taken on Ukraine.

    On this matter of yours –

    They had the psychological momentum. The Ukrainian officers were not leading effectively in 2015; that has changed. In his TedX talk of six years ago, Hodges says Lt. Eric Wood (who fought to the death during the Battle of the Bulge on his own initiative ) and Joshua Chamberlain epitomised what is expected of an officer, and that kind of ethos was inculcated into the Ukrainan armed forces. The standing orders were to fight and not retreat unless authorised to do so. There is a lot more surveillance of commanders and other officials by the very numerous Ukrainian security police too. Putin wanted to reprise his Crimea production as if Ukraine had not taken remedial measures to ensure there could be not repitition. As John Gray says Putin is not a military man

    We seem to be in disagreement. My points about USSR-Finland in 19399 and Russia being militarily better equipped in 1917 than 1914 weren’t addressed by you. These examples lead me to believe that the Kiev regime will not militarily prevail. At the very best, it could IMO possibly get an agreement losing all of the former Ukrainian SSR territory it currently doesn’t control.

    Yes, the Kiev regime forces are better than in 2015. A good number of these forces are no more. Many more of them aren’t so well armed and trained.

    Russia waiting til 2022 serves to show that Russia gave the peaceful option a chance.

    • Replies: @Sean
    @Mikhail


    We seem to be in disagreement. My points about USSR-Finland in 1939
     
    The most important point is that Finland's military successes led to them being supported; Britain and France were preparing an Expeditionary Force to help Finland fight Russia, as Carol Quigley said Neville Chamberlain wanted a declared, but unfought war against Germany, combined with a undeclared although fought war against the USSR.

    These examples lead me to believe that the Kiev regime will not militarily prevail.
     
    Finland was able to come to terms with the Kremlin after three months because Russia wanted land close to Leningrad ceded to them, and after 80,000 frostbite injuries and deaths of the troops didn't increase its demands. Putin's objectives for the war have altered since the begining, going by his statements he increasingly seems to envision a remaking of the entire European security order. That cuts both ways, and so Russia is being informed it could lose its 2014 gains if it percists (see bolded below).

    Along with Hodges’ comment about the Kiev regime retaking Crimea within the next 12 months, he absurdly claimed that Ukrainians and not Russians beat back the Nazis.
     
    Hitler allowed himself to be diverted from Moscow by Ukraine during the crucial four months when his forces had momentum. Führerhauptquartier Werwolf was at Vinnytsia, a location that may have been influenced by the Nazis' proposed trans-European highway to the Crimean Peninsula, which quite possibly will come to fruition now. Seriously though, I think Hodges is saying those things as a counter to statements like Macgregors (which Hodges is surely aware of) because he wants Russia to realise that there is no such thing as a limited liability war.

    Russia waiting til 2022 serves to show that Russia gave the peaceful option a chance
     
    There is no reason why he wouldn't want to settle geopolitical problems without actual hostilities, above all an all-out conventional war; in practical terms the price of dawdling was war would be much more bloody than it would have been if levied in a timely way against Ukrainian army 1.0. rather than the 2.0 version they are now facing. The Kremlin did not seem to have had a correct understanding of the necessity for being firstest with the mostest apparently through assuming could Russia merely move to overawe them a second time. In in the middle of Ukraine proper. Where the Ukrainians were on what they consider their own ground and had logistical infrastruvture to hand. And Russian columns were sitting ducks. The US has not even given Ukraine half of the most effective types of missiles it could yet. All the Russian army can do is try a quick reset and plough on.
    , @LondonBob
    @Mikhail

    Yes Putin was quite clear in his discussion with the Russian pilots just after the start of the war that the aim was the Donbass, but they not could only attack there as the fortifications were too strong. There was never enough men to take Kiev, as it was the distraction worked with the key priority to secure the land bridge to Crimea secured with Mariupol being taken within a weeks. Claims otherwise are just NATO cope.

    In 2015 the Russia economy was not strong enough, Russia was not strong enough diplomatically, the Russian army was still being reformed with key missile technology still in development.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

  583. @Bashibuzuk
    @Dmitry


    In the New Testament, suffering in this world is not related to sins, as not just constantly Jesus says (but also the later writers).
     
    Early Christians have probably believed in Guilgul haNeshamot as some Jewish sects still do today, especially among the Kabbalists.

    Many Gospel passages might be interpreted this way and of course the Gnostics seem to have nearly unanimously held rebirth to be true.

    The possibility for the mindstream to attain gradual purification through the cycles of existence is the only reasonable answer to the problem of suffering.

    There's no other compelling Theodicy.

    I have looked a lot and found no other justification for suffering.

    Most modern Abrahamic teachings are sub-par at explaining human suffering and the origin of our imperfections that are the main true source of our suffering either individual or communal.

    They basically blasphemously ascribe the imperfections in Creation to a most perfect God.

    This is of course wrong and should never be accepted.

    God is perfectly good that is why he has given us a Creation in which we might eventually come ourselves to a perfect goodness. It would of course take a long time from humans' point of view, but there is no time for God.

    https://youtu.be/pjPkfuoTvBI

    https://youtu.be/NOSp8WmbGeE

    This is of course quite similar to Hinduism and even Buddhism to some degree.

    And Rav. Daniel is such a humble and straightforward man.

    🙂

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @S, @Barbarossa, @Dmitry, @silviosilver

    probably believed in Guilgul haNeshamot.. mindstream to attain gradual purification through the cycles of existence is the only reasonable

    At least in Gospels,* Jesus believes this world is going to end very soon, almost immediately and there will be judgement, which not many will be receiving a good report in. For Jesus, the world to come is almost already visible in this world as it is now so close, as he believe they live in the end times.

    For this reason, Jesus is viewing peoples’ saving as an emergency, they don’t have time to slowly improve, in some example they don’t even have time to bury their father.

    By the way, also for Buddha, this idea of a “gradual improvement” by the re-incarnation, can be seen as a trap, which encourages people to delay the sacrifice of themselves.

    Buddha believes being born as a human, is unlikely and rare to almost infinitely small probability. He said it like a blind turtle in the sea, that surfaces every 100 years, finding a floating hollow.

    In your next life, you could be a cow enjoying eating the grass in field in Brazil, that had been part of Amazon rainforest a few years ago. After you grow to your adult size, you, your family, your friends will go to the killing site, and your will all be murdered, your body will be cut in machines and then sent North, to be part of a hamburger that feeds a fat American. Nobody will remember you, nobody will care.

    After your life as a cow, the next life you will be an insect. Repeat thousands of times.

    basically blasphemously ascribe the imperfections in Creation to a most perfect God.

    This is the teaching in the Bible. You can be innocent and your family will be killed. It’s not a mistake. Don’t question.

    You know Bible? “Naked I came from my mother’s womb, And naked I shall return there. Lord gave and the Lord has taken away. Bless the Lord.” https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Job+1%3A18-23&version=NASB

    But the Gnostic might say to us, that this as a “Stockholm syndrome”.

    * Perhaps saying John is like Elijah of this epoch, not necessarily re-incarnation of Elijah. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew%2011%3A7-19&version=NIV

    • Replies: @Dmitry
    @Dmitry


    Jesus believes this world is going to end very soon

     

    And it had seemed like it would be within the life of the current generation, although subsequently this has to be re-interpreted.

    E.g. "This generation will not pass away until all these things take place."

    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew%2024:3-44&version=ESV

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

    , @Bashibuzuk
    @Dmitry

    Yes I read the Bible and of course I have also read the Gospels, which I re-read many times. I have also read the Gnostic Apocrypha and re-read them now and then. The Judgement Day mentioned by Our Lord Jesus might have simply been the moment a person dies.

    Each one of us would then face our own personal Judgement Day. Otherwise, we must accept that our Lord Jesus was mistaken when he said to his Apostles that he will judge their generation. I don't believe that the Son of Man was mistaken, people were and they didn't understand and/or record his sayings properly.

    BTW, Jesus sayings are presented as is in the Apocryphal Gospel of Thomas, some of the sayings and parables are somewhat longer and more complete in the Gospel of Thomas, others are only to be found in the Gospel of Thomas and are absent from the Synaptic Gospels. Anyone interested in Our Lord's sayings should have also a look at the Gospel of Thomas.

    http://www.gnosis.org/naghamm/gosthom-meyer.html

    Gospel of Mary Magdalen is also worth reading, although its very beginning and its central part are unreadable because the codex was too badly damaged. Nevertheless, please see an excerpt below:


    The Savior said, All nature, all formations, all creatures exist in and with one another, and they will be resolved again into their own roots. For the nature of matter is resolved into the roots of its own nature alone.
     
    http://gnosis.org/library/marygosp.htm

    This is of course quite similar to the codependent origination in Buddhism.

    Regarding rebirth in Buddhadharma, the Buddha insisted on the absence of Self in our being and the transitory and impermanent nature of our Ego. If we follow his teaching to its logical limits, then there is nobody who is reincarnated. And yet, Buddhadharma teaches rebirth. The question then is "who or what exactly is "reborn"?"

    😉

    Replies: @Dmitry

  584. @Bashibuzuk
    @AP


    The Slavs defend themselves from the onslaught of the brutal Muscovite Slav-killers; they know how to fight.
     
    Oh come on AP, this is too much hyperbole even though historically some Polish nationalists saw themselves as the defenders of the Slav against the Germanized Russian Empire. RusFed is not a Russian Empire, it is a Noviop Potemkin village, a simulacre, бл☆дский цирк of a country. All it has to with Zalesskaya Rus' of Suzdal'-Vladimir's times is its geographic location. This is irrelevant, it is an equivalent to a "historical phantom limb pain".

    Novgorod was slowly, but surely evolving towards a Hanseatic dominion under Baltic Germanic patronage. This is something Soviet historians don't like to mention, but even though Alexander Nevskyi prevailed against the Teutonic and Sword-bearing Knights, the economy of Novgorod ended up dominated by Germanic merchants under the patronage of the Catholic Church. I like Novgorodian ethos, but their territory would have been lost to Rus if Muscovy wouldn't have acted so ruthlessly.

    https://statehistory.ru/books/Iosif-Kulisher_Istoriya-russkogo-narodnogo-khozyaystva/20

    About the Anglo-saxon and their Atlanticist henchmen, I agree with Fursov nearly entirely. They are the main actors of the Western Globalization since at least the eighteenth century. They have played and won the first Great Game against Russian Empire, then they pushed German Third Reich and Soviets to annihilate each other. They have won the Cold War and now they work to prevent the Chinese OBOR from ever becoming a reality. The Anglosphere thalassocracy has its modus operandi and all that what was happening in RusFed and Ukiestan territories for at least the last two generations is fitting entirely into this pattern.

    BTW, today both RusFedian Ministry of Defence and Foreign Affairs have directly accused the UK special services of being behind the Nord Stream attacks. I am not surprised in the slightest. As ataman Krasnov said just before being handed to Soviet killers in Lienz: "Опять Ангичанка гадит ?".

    https://www.warhistoryonline.com/war-articles/lienz-cossacks.html

    https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/britains-cossack-betrayal/

    As long as Balto-Slav are ready to kill each other, the Anglo-saxon will be happy to oblige and provide guidance and weapons. Then they will reap the bloody harvest (they already started, just see the record gains of the British and American oil and gas industries). It's business only, nothing personal. As usual...

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @S

    About the Anglo-saxon and their Atlanticist henchmen, I agree with Fursov nearly entirely. They are the main actors of the Western Globalization since at least the eighteenth century. They have played and won the first Great Game against Russian Empire, then they pushed German Third Reich and Soviets to annihilate each other.

    I wasn’t familiar with this Fursov, so I thought I would do some checking around on him. I came across a talk he gave about nine years ago (linked below) where he made many good points.

    He starts off with a WWII era quote in regards to what I call the systematic murder of the world’s peoples, ie the war being made against their identities with the aim of destroying them, something that both an individualistic Capitalism, and, it’s complimentary mirror image sister ideology, a collectivist Communism, are entirely in agreement with each other about.

    The destruction of identity, ie peoplehood, is a primary point of each of the world wars, including this present one, that, and consolidating (and adding on to) the already overwhelming global hegemony the US/UK had achieved when they formed their special relationship circa 1900.

    The modern ‘neo-liberalism’ (or, same difference, ‘neo-conservativism’) Fursov speaks of is simply the political embodiment of the synthesis of Capitalism and Communism, ie the political ideology of Global Multi-Culturalism and it’s representative planned world state, the United States of the World*.

    ‘I would like to start my talk with a quotation from the quintessential British imperialist, Winston Churchill, who, in 1940, wrote in a letter, that “Great Britain was fighting not against Hitler, and not even against National Socialism, but against the spirit of the German people, against the spirit of Schiller, so that this spirit would never be reborn.”’

    * The ‘United States of the World’ is a reference to a planned future world state, and is a Masonic concept and term which can be found used historically by both Capitalist and Communist ideologues.

    https://schillerinstitute.com/media/andrey-fursov-the-current-world-crisis-its-social-nature-and-challenge-to-social-science/

  585. @AP
    @silviosilver


    You are claiming the Inquisition believed this, ie it is Catholic doctrine that unrepentant heretics are saved by burning them
     
    If they repent during the process of purification by fire they are saved. What is hard to understand?

    A dorky fan site of a dorky TV show, lol.
     
    Lol, it came up on the google search though.

    Take a break bro, you’re usually a lot better than this.
     
    Thanks for noticing. I’m in process of vacation travelling so my posts will be sparse unless I get bored.

    Replies: @silviosilver

    If they repent during the process of purification by fire they are saved. What is hard to understand?

    I take it you’d now like to revise your claim to make it read they were burned for the purposes of forcing them to repent? I doubt you’ll have any more success furnishing evidence for the revision than you had for the original claim.

    Lol, it came up on the google search though.

    Yes, I can tell. You made a claim you couldn’t defend and found yourself clutching at straws.

    I’m in process of vacation travelling so my posts will be sparse unless I get bored.

    Returning home around the time we click over into OT#201 and the whole thing blows over, I gather.

    : )

  586. @Dmitry
    @Bashibuzuk


    probably believed in Guilgul haNeshamot.. mindstream to attain gradual purification through the cycles of existence is the only reasonable
     
    At least in Gospels,* Jesus believes this world is going to end very soon, almost immediately and there will be judgement, which not many will be receiving a good report in. For Jesus, the world to come is almost already visible in this world as it is now so close, as he believe they live in the end times.

    For this reason, Jesus is viewing peoples' saving as an emergency, they don't have time to slowly improve, in some example they don't even have time to bury their father.

    By the way, also for Buddha, this idea of a "gradual improvement" by the re-incarnation, can be seen as a trap, which encourages people to delay the sacrifice of themselves.

    Buddha believes being born as a human, is unlikely and rare to almost infinitely small probability. He said it like a blind turtle in the sea, that surfaces every 100 years, finding a floating hollow.

    In your next life, you could be a cow enjoying eating the grass in field in Brazil, that had been part of Amazon rainforest a few years ago. After you grow to your adult size, you, your family, your friends will go to the killing site, and your will all be murdered, your body will be cut in machines and then sent North, to be part of a hamburger that feeds a fat American. Nobody will remember you, nobody will care.

    After your life as a cow, the next life you will be an insect. Repeat thousands of times.


    basically blasphemously ascribe the imperfections in Creation to a most perfect God.

     

    This is the teaching in the Bible. You can be innocent and your family will be killed. It's not a mistake. Don't question.

    You know Bible? "Naked I came from my mother’s womb, And naked I shall return there. Lord gave and the Lord has taken away. Bless the Lord.” https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Job+1%3A18-23&version=NASB

    But the Gnostic might say to us, that this as a "Stockholm syndrome".
    -


    * Perhaps saying John is like Elijah of this epoch, not necessarily re-incarnation of Elijah. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew%2011%3A7-19&version=NIV

    Replies: @Dmitry, @Bashibuzuk

    Jesus believes this world is going to end very soon

    And it had seemed like it would be within the life of the current generation, although subsequently this has to be re-interpreted.

    E.g. “This generation will not pass away until all these things take place.”

    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew%2024:3-44&version=ESV

    • Replies: @Bashibuzuk
    @Dmitry

    Please see my answer above.

  587. @Bashibuzuk
    @Dmitry


    In the New Testament, suffering in this world is not related to sins, as not just constantly Jesus says (but also the later writers).
     
    Early Christians have probably believed in Guilgul haNeshamot as some Jewish sects still do today, especially among the Kabbalists.

    Many Gospel passages might be interpreted this way and of course the Gnostics seem to have nearly unanimously held rebirth to be true.

    The possibility for the mindstream to attain gradual purification through the cycles of existence is the only reasonable answer to the problem of suffering.

    There's no other compelling Theodicy.

    I have looked a lot and found no other justification for suffering.

    Most modern Abrahamic teachings are sub-par at explaining human suffering and the origin of our imperfections that are the main true source of our suffering either individual or communal.

    They basically blasphemously ascribe the imperfections in Creation to a most perfect God.

    This is of course wrong and should never be accepted.

    God is perfectly good that is why he has given us a Creation in which we might eventually come ourselves to a perfect goodness. It would of course take a long time from humans' point of view, but there is no time for God.

    https://youtu.be/pjPkfuoTvBI

    https://youtu.be/NOSp8WmbGeE

    This is of course quite similar to Hinduism and even Buddhism to some degree.

    And Rav. Daniel is such a humble and straightforward man.

    🙂

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @S, @Barbarossa, @Dmitry, @silviosilver

    Most modern Abrahamic teachings are sub-par at explaining human suffering and the origin of our imperfections that are the main true source of our suffering either individual or communal.

    They basically blasphemously ascribe the imperfections in Creation to a most perfect God.

    “Blasphemously”? More like illogically. If God hates evil (or “sin”) so much, then why did he create it? Why did he create a universe in which the very possibility of evil or sin exists? He didn’t have to. He is God. He could have easily created a universe with no evil and no sin. He could have created a universe with no pain, too – which I can’t help thinking would have been kinda nice.

    Well he is God and I am but a lowly man, so perhaps it’s wrong for me to think I could ever understand his reasons. And maybe despite the fact that so much suffering seems unnecessary, God is still “good.” But can we really say he is “perfect”? God might be good, but if I can imagine a better God – eg a God that did everything else the same, but he created 1% less suffering – doesn’t that mean he is not the best possible God?

    “Possible” here is a thorny term – who knows whether such a God would have been “possible” – but it still creates difficulties for people who believe God is perfect. Can he really be perfect if people can imagine a more perfect God? After all, when we say “perfect” it’s our ideas about what perfect means that we are referring to, so if we can come up with something more perfect and notice that the God doesn’t live up to it, we can say he is less than perfect.

    • Replies: @Bashibuzuk
    @silviosilver


    He could have easily created a universe with no evil and no sin. He could have created a universe with no pain, too – which I can’t help thinking would have been kinda nice.
     
    He has created a Universe (actually a Multiverse comprising possibly an infinite number of Universes) that allows his creatures an infinite potential of freedom and evolution.

    If he would have created the Universe that you describe, it would have been a "closed system" static in its perfection and therefore inferior to the "open system" that we are witnessing every single moment of our existence.

    He has shown us the way that would be best for us to follow to evolve towards Him and as rapidly as possible shed as much imperfection (that you call sin) as possible. We are free to follow this path now or to follow it later. He is anyway the Attractor that will hopefully bring all of us into him again.

    Freedom is worth the suffering, and possibility to evolve is worth the pain. At least from my subjective experience. And God knows best...

    Replies: @silviosilver

    , @Coconuts
    @silviosilver


    “Possible” here is a thorny term – who knows whether such a God would have been “possible” – but it still creates difficulties for people who believe God is perfect. Can he really be perfect if people can imagine a more perfect God?
     
    Thinking about this is probably how the idea of a maximally perfect being arose, or the idea that God is infinitely perfect in every aspect of being.

    Well he is God and I am but a lowly man, so perhaps it’s wrong for me to think I could ever understand his reasons. And maybe despite the fact that so much suffering seems unnecessary, God is still “good.” But can we really say he is “perfect”? God might be good, but if I can imagine a better God – eg a God that did everything else the same, but he created 1% less suffering – doesn’t that mean he is not the best possible God?
     
    Often people defending the idea of God as a maximally perfect being, or perfect being itself etc. don't use design arguments to do so. This is because it is not really possible to do it by trying to read attributes like perfection off opinions about how good a designer God is or whether he lives up to a particular conception of what a responsible moral agent would do (probably doing that is in itself illogical unless you are already a Kantian).

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

  588. Bashibuzuk says:
    @Barbarossa
    @Bashibuzuk


    They would have no Divine Light inside, no Buddha Nature, no Fitrah, perhaps no Consciousness at all. This type of person would be an irredeemable Icchantika that cannot be Awaken and even less so Enlightened.
     
    I would say that this state can also be termed Hell. We are not put into Hell, but we are fully capable of putting ourselves there, though it takes some work. God never turns away from us, but we are fully capable of rejecting God and if this is done in a systematic enough way we create a willful separation from the Divine. Such a person may become worse than an animal, as the Divine nature twisted inside of them will invent perversions of creation that no lower animal is capable of.

    But I have to agree with you that in the end even these will be unable to deny the power of the essential Divine Reality.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

    We cannot detach from God. God is the ground of being on which our existences unfold. The best argument for God’s being (as distinguished from our existence) that I ever read was perhaps the following Ismaili blog post:

    https://ismailignosis.com/2014/03/27/he-who-is-above-all-else-the-strongest-argument-for-the-existence-of-god/

    It is exceptional in that it is entirely aligned with classical Greek philosophy. This is of course not surprising, given that Ismaili were originally Islamic Neoplatonicists.

    Now, they should have not used the word “existence” instead of “being” when writing about God. Existence is always being in relation to and outside of something else. God is, while his Creation exists. But that’s semantics for the majority of people anyways.

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @Bashibuzuk


    We cannot detach from God. God is the ground of being on which our existences unfold.
     
    I'm very pleased to hear that you seem to be returning to your religious roots, that is Orthodox Christianity.

    It is exceptional in that it is entirely aligned with classical Greek philosophy. This is of course not surprising, given that Ismaili were originally Islamic Neoplatonicists.

     

    Since you seem to exceptionally value classical Greek philosophy and neoplatonic thought, than you must surely value Orthodoxy too.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk, @Dmitry

  589. @Beckow
    @Mikel


    ...Russia had the incomparably better choice of continuing to develop economically, trying to improve relations with everybody and maintain or enlarge the formidable security umbrella that it already had, with the largest nuclear arsenal in the world.
     
    That's not an answer to my question, that is a generic high-level evasive non-answer. My question was what was Russia supposed to do about Nato moving into Ukraine and Kiev government (and obviously a large part of Ukie society) suppressing the rights of Russians in Ukraine, closing schools, banning Russian in offices, bombing them.

    That is the question and not some economic development or having nukes. Your answer amounts to telling Russia to do nothing. They couldn't do nothing - the specific situation in Ukraine that lasted for 8 years was not something any large country - and many smaller ones - could ignore.

    Both the issue of Nato moving into Ukraine and the suppression of Russians were well documented and discussed for years. It was an attempt by the West to dare Russia to do something. They either thought Russia was bluffing or they actually welcome the war. So we have a war, but to pretend that Russia had another rational choice is foolish. Doing nothing as you suggest was not an option. It wouldn't be for US, China, France, UK, in the similar circumstances.

    Try again, this time with an actual answer.

    Replies: @silviosilver, @Mikel, @Philip Owen

    Based on this logic, you should have been calling for Russia to invade even before Russia did. Can you (or someone) refresh my memory: were you indeed calling for Russia to invade before the invasion?

    My question was what was Russia supposed to do about Nato moving into Ukraine and Kiev government (and obviously a large part of Ukie society) suppressing the rights of Russians in Ukraine, closing schools, banning Russian in offices, bombing them.

    “What was Germany supposed to do about British and French support for Poland and the Warsaw government (and obviously a large part of Polack society) suppressing the rights of Germans in Poland, closing schools, banning German, bombing them.”

    You support the one but treat the other as heinous and I struggle to see what real difference between them is.

    • Replies: @Beckow
    @silviosilver


    ...calling for Russia to invade even before Russia did
     
    No, until the very end - till February - there was a viable compromise: Minsk deal gave Russians in Ukraine some autonomy and an offer by Nato to freeze or cancel plans for Nato in Ukraine. It was not done. For two crucial months pre-war Nato refused to engage and repeated ad nauseam that 'Kiev is sovereign and can do what they want'. To pretend that the deal wasn't available for Kiev-Nato is simply lying. The details were hard, there was no trust, but the war is much worse.

    What was Germany supposed to do about British and French support for Poland and the Warsaw government
     
    There are more differences than similarities: Germany had an announced plan to take and settle territories in the east (Lebensraum), Poland wasn't going to be the end. Poland didn't ban German language in schools, they did suppress the German minority, but stayed within limits. And Nazis were just different - let's not argue obvious things. But I agree that Poland acted aggressively and stupidly: complete rights for Germans (and Ukies) were ok. And the infamous corridor was a reasonable request.

    My opposition to Germany in WW2 stems from their heinous behavior in the war - especially in the east, incl. in my country. It was uncivilized. The pre-WW2 situation was complex and if Nazis were not Nazis and some in the West didn't want the war so badly, it may have been avoided. Germans had valid points.

    Russia is no shape or form like Nazi Germany of late 30's. People who say it is are morons. There was a way to address this without challenging Russia to dare to invade. Once they did, all bets are off, and we are all much, much worse off.

    If you want to move a bear, the bear has to agree - that was obvious from the start.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

  590. Bashibuzuk says:
    @Dmitry
    @Bashibuzuk


    probably believed in Guilgul haNeshamot.. mindstream to attain gradual purification through the cycles of existence is the only reasonable
     
    At least in Gospels,* Jesus believes this world is going to end very soon, almost immediately and there will be judgement, which not many will be receiving a good report in. For Jesus, the world to come is almost already visible in this world as it is now so close, as he believe they live in the end times.

    For this reason, Jesus is viewing peoples' saving as an emergency, they don't have time to slowly improve, in some example they don't even have time to bury their father.

    By the way, also for Buddha, this idea of a "gradual improvement" by the re-incarnation, can be seen as a trap, which encourages people to delay the sacrifice of themselves.

    Buddha believes being born as a human, is unlikely and rare to almost infinitely small probability. He said it like a blind turtle in the sea, that surfaces every 100 years, finding a floating hollow.

    In your next life, you could be a cow enjoying eating the grass in field in Brazil, that had been part of Amazon rainforest a few years ago. After you grow to your adult size, you, your family, your friends will go to the killing site, and your will all be murdered, your body will be cut in machines and then sent North, to be part of a hamburger that feeds a fat American. Nobody will remember you, nobody will care.

    After your life as a cow, the next life you will be an insect. Repeat thousands of times.


    basically blasphemously ascribe the imperfections in Creation to a most perfect God.

     

    This is the teaching in the Bible. You can be innocent and your family will be killed. It's not a mistake. Don't question.

    You know Bible? "Naked I came from my mother’s womb, And naked I shall return there. Lord gave and the Lord has taken away. Bless the Lord.” https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Job+1%3A18-23&version=NASB

    But the Gnostic might say to us, that this as a "Stockholm syndrome".
    -


    * Perhaps saying John is like Elijah of this epoch, not necessarily re-incarnation of Elijah. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew%2011%3A7-19&version=NIV

    Replies: @Dmitry, @Bashibuzuk

    Yes I read the Bible and of course I have also read the Gospels, which I re-read many times. I have also read the Gnostic Apocrypha and re-read them now and then. The Judgement Day mentioned by Our Lord Jesus might have simply been the moment a person dies.

    Each one of us would then face our own personal Judgement Day. Otherwise, we must accept that our Lord Jesus was mistaken when he said to his Apostles that he will judge their generation. I don’t believe that the Son of Man was mistaken, people were and they didn’t understand and/or record his sayings properly.

    BTW, Jesus sayings are presented as is in the Apocryphal Gospel of Thomas, some of the sayings and parables are somewhat longer and more complete in the Gospel of Thomas, others are only to be found in the Gospel of Thomas and are absent from the Synaptic Gospels. Anyone interested in Our Lord’s sayings should have also a look at the Gospel of Thomas.

    http://www.gnosis.org/naghamm/gosthom-meyer.html

    Gospel of Mary Magdalen is also worth reading, although its very beginning and its central part are unreadable because the codex was too badly damaged. Nevertheless, please see an excerpt below:

    The Savior said, All nature, all formations, all creatures exist in and with one another, and they will be resolved again into their own roots. For the nature of matter is resolved into the roots of its own nature alone.

    http://gnosis.org/library/marygosp.htm

    This is of course quite similar to the codependent origination in Buddhism.

    Regarding rebirth in Buddhadharma, the Buddha insisted on the absence of Self in our being and the transitory and impermanent nature of our Ego. If we follow his teaching to its logical limits, then there is nobody who is reincarnated. And yet, Buddhadharma teaches rebirth. The question then is “who or what exactly is “reborn”?”

    😉

    • Replies: @Dmitry
    @Bashibuzuk


    he will judge their generation
     
    It is popular to re-interpret prophecy of Jesus, that it will be "within a single generation" (the events of the end times), not "this generation" (of the Apostles) that will see the end times. But this prophecy of Jesus begins with the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem. Gospel of Mark (which is the mastertext, which other Gospels are derived from) is written around 70 AD.

    70 AD is the year Romans destroy Jerusalem. After sieging Jerusalem for months, they destroy the Temple.

    So, the prophecy of Jesus, begins with the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem, and the mastertext (Gospel of Mark) of the Gospels, is written at this time when the Temple is destroyed.

    It was seeming to be about the generation which had seen the destruction of the Temple, which is the same time the Gospel (on which other Gospels are based) is written. The prophecy of Jesus begins with the same event, when the text is written (Gospel of Mark is written around 30 years after the death of Jesus).

    In the minimum, we know the prophecy begins with the destruction of Temple and (according to re-interpretation) all events of end times will be seen in this a single generation.

    If we assume Jesus must be correct (and Gospels has correctly written his views), then re-interpret the prophecy "this generation" to "within a single generation" (which maybe be difficult for some people to accept), then it means the Temple will have to be rebuilt, before the times of the tribulation.

    For the Temple to be destroyed, it would have to be rebuilt first. At the moment, there are no plans to rebuild the Temple in Jerusalem, so you can all relax about worrying the apocalypse will be happening soon, if you accept the prophecy of Jesus as written in Gospels must be true.

    If you wake one day and read on the CNN site they plan to rebuild the Temple, that you can begin to worry.


    Buddhadharma teaches rebirth. The question then is “who or what exactly is “reborn”?”

     

    Well, think about the person e.g. Donald Trump.

    Their persona, we all know from the public life. On the other hand, perhaps their family and friend will know their ego - which is their thoughts, feeling, memory and habits. And the continuation of this across time is likely dependent on the health of their body. If they have Alzheimer's they will lose this.

    But what is there without this? There is person when they are not thinking, feeling or remembering.

    The question whether this nonthinking, nonrememering person can continue without the body and Trump's soul when not thinking is different than e.g. Biden?


    Self in our being and the transitory and impermanent
     
    Although peoples' anecdotes about re-incarnation, will usually be based in the memories of the children. https://tinyurl.com/2rx24cay If you believe memories would transmigrate (which I'm not sure is supported by Buddhism), it would be like we were using cloud storage
    solution instead of the onboard storage devices we would assume.

    might have simply been the moment a person dies.

     

    Time would be feature of the physical reality, or how consciousness is processing it. But as the person dies, it would not be necessary to assume. "This moment" of death, would not necessarily be differentiated, if you assume this is not the closure of the person. I.e. it would possible to assume everyone dies at the same moment.
  591. @Dmitry
    @Dmitry


    Jesus believes this world is going to end very soon

     

    And it had seemed like it would be within the life of the current generation, although subsequently this has to be re-interpreted.

    E.g. "This generation will not pass away until all these things take place."

    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew%2024:3-44&version=ESV

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

    Please see my answer above.

  592. S says:
    @Bashibuzuk
    @S

    There would be neither Soviet nor Nazi rapid build up of war industry if not for Anglo-saxon finances and technological transfers. Anthony Sutton and other researchers in the West and post-Soviet Russia have demonstrated this. The Germans and the Slavs have been primed to kill each other. Also Germans have been primed to push the Zionist Jews out of Europe and towards the Holy Land while they simultaneously exterminate the religious Orthodox anti-Zionist Jewry. Tens of millions died, Europe was drenched in blood and scortched with fire. It was a risky and dirty affair but it worked in the end. When the Devil plays chess he plays both sides of the board game. Globalists are the masters of (false) dialectics...

    Replies: @S

    There would be neither Soviet nor Nazi rapid build up of war industry if not for Anglo-saxon finances and technological transfers. Anthony Sutton and other researchers in the West and post-Soviet Russia have demonstrated this. The Germans and the Slavs have been primed to kill each other.

    Yes, as you allude there was an Italian fellow (his name escapes me at the moment) who wrote a book entitled Conjuring Hitler which alleged much the same as Sutton.

    A little over a decade ago Rolling Stone magazine published a huge article (linked to and reproduced below ‘More’) which claim Goldman Sach’s has manipulated into being every market bubble since the Great Depression for profits sake.

    As is known, Hitler was having some trouble getting into power in Germany in the 1920’s. Though the article doesn’t say so, I think it’s entirely possible the Great Depression itself, in addition for the generic purpose of profit taking, had been engineered specifically for the purpose of catapulting Hitler into power in Germany.

    They wanted the most radical and militant expression of German identity in power, so as to most likely ensure the starting of a world war that would (1) do as much damage to Russia and the Russian people as possible (2) once the trap had been sprung, make the crushing of German identity as complete and thorough as possible when the overwhelming power of the controlled Capitalist vs Communist dialectic (as encapsulated respectively by the US/UK and Soviet Union) inevitably closed in upon them.

    Now, with WWIII, the US/UK and allies hope to do the same to Russia (and China, Eastern Europe, Turkey, etc) what was done to Germany (and Japan) in WWII.

    I think the elements and hangers on of the US/UK elites behind these world wars quite questionable rationalization to themselves is, in part that, ‘it was going to happen anyway’, and, ‘we’re just helping things along’.

    And, of course, there is always ‘the ends justify the means’.

    The Great American Bubble Machine

    From tech stocks to high gas prices, Goldman Sachs has engineered every major market manipulation since the Great Depression — and they’re about to do it again.

    The first thing you need to know about Goldman Sachs is that it’s everywhere. The world’s most powerful investment bank is a great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity, relentlessly jamming its blood funnel into anything that smells like money. In fact, the history of the recent financial crisis, which doubles as a history of the rapid decline and fall of the suddenly swindled dry American empire, reads like a Who’s Who of Goldman Sachs graduates.

    [MORE]

    By now, most of us know the major players. As George Bush’s last Treasury secretary, former Goldman CEO Henry Paulson was the architect of the bailout, a suspiciously self-serving plan to funnel trillions of Your Dollars to a handful of his old friends on Wall Street. Robert Rubin, Bill Clinton’s former Treasury secretary, spent 26 years at Goldman before becoming chairman of Citigroup — which in turn got a $300 billion taxpayer bailout from Paulson. There’s John Thain, the asshole chief of Merrill Lynch who bought an $87,000 area rug for his office as his company was imploding; a former Goldman banker, Thain enjoyed a multi-billion-dollar handout from Paulson, who used billions in taxpayer funds to help Bank of America rescue Thain’s sorry company. And Robert Steel, the former Goldmanite head of Wachovia, scored himself and his fellow executives $225 million in golden-parachute payments as his bank was self-destructing. There’s Joshua Bolten, Bush’s chief of staff during the bailout, and Mark Patterson, the current Treasury chief of staff, who was a Goldman lobbyist just a year ago, and Ed Liddy, the former Goldman director whom Paulson put in charge of bailed-out insurance giant AIG, which forked over $13 billion to Goldman after Liddy came on board. The heads of the Canadian and Italian national banks are Goldman alums, as is the head of the World Bank, the head of the New York Stock Exchange, the last two heads of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York — which, incidentally, is now in charge of overseeing Goldman — not to mention …

    But then, any attempt to construct a narrative around all the former Goldmanites in influential positions quickly becomes an absurd and pointless exercise, like trying to make a list of everything. What you need to know is the big picture: If America is circling the drain, Goldman Sachs has found a way to be that drain — an extremely unfortunate loophole in the system of Western democratic capitalism, which never foresaw that in a society governed passively by free markets and free elections, organized greed always defeats disorganized democracy.

    The bank’s unprecedented reach and power have enabled it to turn all of America into a giant pump-and-dump scam, manipulating whole economic sectors for years at a time, moving the dice game as this or that market collapses, and all the time gorging itself on the unseen costs that are breaking families everywhere — high gas prices, rising consumer credit rates, half-eaten pension funds, mass layoffs, future taxes to pay off bailouts. All that money that you’re losing, it’s going somewhere, and in both a literal and a figurative sense, Goldman Sachs is where it’s going: The bank is a huge, highly sophisticated engine for converting the useful, deployed wealth of society into the least useful, most wasteful and insoluble substance on Earth — pure profit for rich individuals.

    The Feds vs. Goldman

    They achieve this using the same playbook over and over again. The formula is relatively simple: Goldman positions itself in the middle of a speculative bubble, selling investments they know are crap. Then they hoover up vast sums from the middle and lower floors of society with the aid of a crippled and corrupt state that allows it to rewrite the rules in exchange for the relative pennies the bank throws at political patronage. Finally, when it all goes bust, leaving millions of ordinary citizens broke and starving, they begin the entire process over again, riding in to rescue us all by lending us back our own money at interest, selling themselves as men above greed, just a bunch of really smart guys keeping the wheels greased. They’ve been pulling this same stunt over and over since the 1920s — and now they’re preparing to do it again, creating what may be the biggest and most audacious bubble yet.

    If you want to understand how we got into this financial crisis, you have to first understand where all the money went — and in order to understand that, you need to understand what Goldman has already gotten away with. It is a history exactly five bubbles long — including last year’s strange and seemingly inexplicable spike in the price of oil. There were a lot of losers in each of those bubbles, and in the bailout that followed. But Goldman wasn’t one of them.

    BUBBLE #1 The Great Depression

    Goldman wasn’t always a too-big-to-fail Wall Street behemoth, the ruthless face of kill-or-be-killed capitalism on steroids —just almost always. The bank was actually founded in 1869 by a German immigrant named Marcus Goldman, who built it up with his son-in-law Samuel Sachs. They were pioneers in the use of commercial paper, which is just a fancy way of saying they made money lending out short-term IOUs to smalltime vendors in downtown Manhattan.

    You can probably guess the basic plotline of Goldman’s first 100 years in business: plucky, immigrant-led investment bank beats the odds, pulls itself up by its bootstraps, makes shitloads of money. In that ancient history there’s really only one episode that bears scrutiny now, in light of more recent events: Goldman’s disastrous foray into the speculative mania of pre-crash Wall Street in the late 1920s.

    Wall Street’s Big Win

    This great Hindenburg of financial history has a few features that might sound familiar. Back then, the main financial tool used to bilk investors was called an “investment trust.” Similar to modern mutual funds, the trusts took the cash of investors large and small and (theoretically, at least) invested it in a smorgasbord of Wall Street securities, though the securities and amounts were often kept hidden from the public. So a regular guy could invest $10 or $100 in a trust and feel like he was a big player. Much as in the 1990s, when new vehicles like day trading and e-trading attracted reams of new suckers from the sticks who wanted to feel like big shots, investment trusts roped a new generation of regular-guy investors into the speculation game.

    Beginning a pattern that would repeat itself over and over again, Goldman got into the investmenttrust game late, then jumped in with both feet and went hogwild. The first effort was the Goldman Sachs Trading Corporation; the bank issued a million shares at $100 apiece, bought all those shares with its own money and then sold 90 percent of them to the hungry public at $104. The trading corporation then relentlessly bought shares in itself, bidding the price up further and further. Eventually it dumped part of its holdings and sponsored a new trust, the Shenandoah Corporation, issuing millions more in shares in that fund — which in turn sponsored yet another trust called the Blue Ridge Corporation. In this way, each investment trust served as a front for an endless investment pyramid: Goldman hiding behind Goldman hiding behind Goldman. Of the 7,250,000 initial shares of Blue Ridge, 6,250,000 were actually owned by Shenandoah — which, of course, was in large part owned by Goldman Trading.

    The end result (ask yourself if this sounds familiar) was a daisy chain of borrowed money, one exquisitely vulnerable to a decline in performance anywhere along the line. The basic idea isn’t hard to follow. You take a dollar and borrow nine against it; then you take that $10 fund and borrow $90; then you take your $100 fund and, so long as the public is still lending, borrow and invest $900. If the last fund in the line starts to lose value, you no longer have the money to pay back your investors, and everyone gets massacred.

    In a chapter from The Great Crash, 1929 titled “In Goldman Sachs We Trust,” the famed economist John Kenneth Galbraith held up the Blue Ridge and Shenandoah trusts as classic examples of the insanity of leveragebased investment. The trusts, he wrote, were a major cause of the market’s historic crash; in today’s dollars, the losses the bank suffered totaled $475 billion. “It is difficult not to marvel at the imagination which was implicit in this gargantuan insanity,” Galbraith observed, sounding like Keith Olbermann in an ascot. “If there must be madness, something may be said for having it on a heroic scale.”

    BUBBLE #2 Tech Stocks

    Fast-forward about 65 years. Goldman not only survived the crash that wiped out so many of the investors it duped, it went on to become the chief underwriter to the country’s wealthiest and most powerful corporations. Thanks to Sidney Weinberg, who rose from the rank of janitor’s assistant to head the firm, Goldman became the pioneer of the initial public offering, one of the principal and most lucrative means by which companies raise money. During the 1970s and 1980s, Goldman may not have been the planet-eating Death Star of political influence it is today, but it was a top-drawer firm that had a reputation for attracting the very smartest talent on the Street.

    It also, oddly enough, had a reputation for relatively solid ethics and a patient approach to investment that shunned the fast buck; its executives were trained to adopt the firm’s mantra, “long-term greedy.” One former Goldman banker who left the firm in the early Nineties recalls seeing his superiors give up a very profitable deal on the grounds that it was a long-term loser. “We gave back money to ‘grownup’ corporate clients who had made bad deals with us,” he says. “Everything we did was legal and fair — but ‘long-term greedy’ said we didn’t want to make such a profit at the clients’ collective expense that we spoiled the marketplace.”

    But then, something happened. It’s hard to say what it was exactly; it might have been the fact that Goldman’s cochairman in the early Nineties, Robert Rubin, followed Bill Clinton to the White House, where he directed the National Economic Council and eventually became Treasury secretary. While the American media fell in love with the story line of a pair of baby-boomer, Sixties-child, Fleetwood Mac yuppies nesting in the White House, it also nursed an undisguised crush on Rubin, who was hyped as without a doubt the smartest person ever to walk the face of the Earth, with Newton, Einstein, Mozart and Kant running far behind.

    Rubin was the prototypical Goldman banker. He was probably born in a $4,000 suit, he had a face that seemed permanently frozen just short of an apology for being so much smarter than you, and he exuded a Spock-like, emotion-neutral exterior; the only human feeling you could imagine him experiencing was a nightmare about being forced to fly coach. It became almost a national clichè that whatever Rubin thought was best for the economy — a phenomenon that reached its apex in 1999, when Rubin appeared on the cover of Time with his Treasury deputy, Larry Summers, and Fed chief Alan Greenspan under the headline The Committee To Save The World. And “what Rubin thought,” mostly, was that the American economy, and in particular the financial markets, were over-regulated and needed to be set free. During his tenure at Treasury, the Clinton White House made a series of moves that would have drastic consequences for the global economy — beginning with Rubin’s complete and total failure to regulate his old firm during its first mad dash for obscene short-term profits.

    The basic scam in the Internet Age is pretty easy even for the financially illiterate to grasp. Companies that weren’t much more than pot-fueled ideas scrawled on napkins by uptoolate bongsmokers were taken public via IPOs, hyped in the media and sold to the public for mega-millions. It was as if banks like Goldman were wrapping ribbons around watermelons, tossing them out 50-story windows and opening the phones for bids. In this game you were a winner only if you took your money out before the melon hit the pavement.

    It sounds obvious now, but what the average investor didn’t know at the time was that the banks had changed the rules of the game, making the deals look better than they actually were. They did this by setting up what was, in reality, a two-tiered investment system — one for the insiders who knew the real numbers, and another for the lay investor who was invited to chase soaring prices the banks themselves knew were irrational. While Goldman’s later pattern would be to capitalize on changes in the regulatory environment, its key innovation in the Internet years was to abandon its own industry’s standards of quality control.

    “Since the Depression, there were strict underwriting guidelines that Wall Street adhered to when taking a company public,” says one prominent hedge-fund manager. “The company had to be in business for a minimum of five years, and it had to show profitability for three consecutive years. But Wall Street took these guidelines and threw them in the trash.” Goldman completed the snow job by pumping up the sham stocks: “Their analysts were out there saying Bullshit.com is worth $100 a share.”

    The problem was, nobody told investors that the rules had changed. “Everyone on the inside knew,” the manager says. “Bob Rubin sure as hell knew what the underwriting standards were. They’d been intact since the 1930s.”

    Jay Ritter, a professor of finance at the University of Florida who specializes in IPOs, says banks like Goldman knew full well that many of the public offerings they were touting would never make a dime. “In the early Eighties, the major underwriters insisted on three years of profitability. Then it was one year, then it was a quarter. By the time of the Internet bubble, they were not even requiring profitability in the foreseeable future.”

    Goldman has denied that it changed its underwriting standards during the Internet years, but its own statistics belie the claim. Just as it did with the investment trust in the 1920s, Goldman started slow and finished crazy in the Internet years. After it took a little-known company with weak financials called Yahoo! public in 1996, once the tech boom had already begun, Goldman quickly became the IPO king of the Internet era. Of the 24 companies it took public in 1997, a third were losing money at the time of the IPO. In 1999, at the height of the boom, it took 47 companies public, including stillborns like Webvan and eToys, investment offerings that were in many ways the modern equivalents of Blue Ridge and Shenandoah. The following year, it underwrote 18 companies in the first four months, 14 of which were money losers at the time. As a leading underwriter of Internet stocks during the boom, Goldman provided profits far more volatile than those of its competitors: In 1999, the average Goldman IPO leapt 281 percent above its offering price, compared to the Wall Street average of 181 percent.

    How did Goldman achieve such extraordinary results? One answer is that they used a practice called “laddering,” which is just a fancy way of saying they manipulated the share price of new offerings. Here’s how it works: Say you’re Goldman Sachs, and Bullshit.com comes to you and asks you to take their company public. You agree on the usual terms: You’ll price the stock, determine how many shares should be released and take the Bullshit.com CEO on a “road show” to schmooze investors, all in exchange for a substantial fee (typically six to seven percent of the amount raised). You then promise your best clients the right to buy big chunks of the IPO at the low offering price — let’s say Bullshit.com’s starting share price is $15 — in exchange for a promise that they will buy more shares later on the open market. That seemingly simple demand gives you inside knowledge of the IPO’s future, knowledge that wasn’t disclosed to the day trader schmucks who only had the prospectus to go by: You know that certain of your clients who bought X amount of shares at $15 are also going to buy Y more shares at $20 or $25, virtually guaranteeing that the price is going to go to $25 and beyond. In this way, Goldman could artificially jack up the new company’s price, which of course was to the bank’s benefit — a six percent fee of a $500 million IPO is serious money.

    Goldman was repeatedly sued by shareholders for engaging in laddering in a variety of Internet IPOs, including Webvan and NetZero. The deceptive practices also caught the attention of Nicholas Maier, the syndicate manager of Cramer & Co., the hedge fund run at the time by the now-famous chattering television asshole Jim Cramer, himself a Goldman alum. Maier told the SEC that while working for Cramer between 1996 and 1998, he was repeatedly forced to engage in laddering practices during IPO deals with Goldman.

    “Goldman, from what I witnessed, they were the worst perpetrator,” Maier said. “They totally fueled the bubble. And it’s specifically that kind of behavior that has caused the market crash. They built these stocks upon an illegal foundation — manipulated up — and ultimately, it really was the small person who ended up buying in.” In 2005, Goldman agreed to pay $40 million for its laddering violations — a puny penalty relative to the enormous profits it made. (Goldman, which has denied wrongdoing in all of the cases it has settled, refused to respond to questions for this story.)

    Another practice Goldman engaged in during the Internet boom was “spinning,” better known as bribery. Here the investment bank would offer the executives of the newly public company shares at extra-low prices, in exchange for future underwriting business. Banks that engaged in spinning would then undervalue the initial offering price — ensuring that those “hot” opening-price shares it had handed out to insiders would be more likely to rise quickly, supplying bigger first-day rewards for the chosen few. So instead of Bullshit.com opening at $20, the bank would approach the Bullshit.com CEO and offer him a million shares of his own company at $18 in exchange for future business — effectively robbing all of Bullshit’s new shareholders by diverting cash that should have gone to the company’s bottom line into the private bank account of the company’s CEO.

    In one case, Goldman allegedly gave a multimillion-dollar special offering to eBay CEO Meg Whitman, who later joined Goldman’s board, in exchange for future i-banking business. According to a report by the House Financial Services Committee in 2002, Goldman gave special stock offerings to executives in 21 companies that it took public, including Yahoo! cofounder Jerry Yang and two of the great slithering villains of the financial-scandal age — Tyco’s Dennis Kozlowski and Enron’s Ken Lay. Goldman angrily denounced the report as “an egregious distortion of the facts” — shortly before paying $110 million to settle an investigation into spinning and other manipulations launched by New York state regulators. “The spinning of hot IPO shares was not a harmless corporate perk,” then-attorney general Eliot Spitzer said at the time. “Instead, it was an integral part of a fraudulent scheme to win new investment-banking business.”

    Such practices conspired to turn the Internet bubble into one of the greatest financial disasters in world history: Some $5 trillion of wealth was wiped out on the NASDAQ alone. But the real problem wasn’t the money that was lost by shareholders, it was the money gained by investment bankers, who received hefty bonuses for tampering with the market. Instead of teaching Wall Street a lesson that bubbles always deflate, the Internet years demonstrated to bankers that in the age of freely flowing capital and publicly owned financial companies, bubbles are incredibly easy to inflate, and individual bonuses are actually bigger when the mania and the irrationality are greater.

    Nowhere was this truer than at Goldman. Between 1999 and 2002, the firm paid out $28.5 billion in compensation and benefits — an average of roughly $350,000 a year per employee. Those numbers are important because the key legacy of the Internet boom is that the economy is now driven in large part by the pursuit of the enormous salaries and bonuses that such bubbles make possible. Goldman’s mantra of “long-term greedy” vanished into thin air as the game became about getting your check before the melon hit the pavement.

    The market was no longer a rationally managed place to grow real, profitable businesses: It was a huge ocean of Someone Else’s Money where bankers hauled in vast sums through whatever means necessary and tried to convert that money into bonuses and payouts as quickly as possible. If you laddered and spun 50 Internet IPOs that went bust within a year, so what? By the time the Securities and Exchange Commission got around to fining your firm $110 million, the yacht you bought with your IPO bonuses was already six years old. Besides, you were probably out of Goldman by then, running the U.S. Treasury or maybe the state of New Jersey. (One of the truly comic moments in the history of America’s recent financial collapse came when Gov. Jon Corzine of New Jersey, who ran Goldman from 1994 to 1999 and left with $320 million in IPO-fattened stock, insisted in 2002 that “I’ve never even heard the term ‘laddering’ before.”)

    For a bank that paid out $7 billion a year in salaries, $110 million fines issued half a decade late were something far less than a deterrent —they were a joke. Once the Internet bubble burst, Goldman had no incentive to reassess its new, profit-driven strategy; it just searched around for another bubble to inflate. As it turns out, it had one ready, thanks in large part to Rubin.

    BUBBLE #3 The Housing Craze

    Goldman’s role in the sweeping global disaster that was the housing bubble is not hard to trace. Here again, the basic trick was a decline in underwriting standards, although in this case the standards weren’t in IPOs but in mortgages. By now almost everyone knows that for decades mortgage dealers insisted that home buyers be able to produce a down payment of 10 percent or more, show a steady income and good credit rating, and possess a real first and last name. Then, at the dawn of the new millennium, they suddenly threw all that shit out the window and started writing mortgages on the backs of napkins to cocktail waitresses and ex-cons carrying five bucks and a Snickers bar.

    None of that would have been possible without investment bankers like Goldman, who created vehicles to package those shitty mortgages and sell them en masse to unsuspecting insurance companies and pension funds. This created a mass market for toxic debt that would never have existed before; in the old days, no bank would have wanted to keep some addict ex-con’s mortgage on its books, knowing how likely it was to fail. You can’t write these mortgages, in other words, unless you can sell them to someone who doesn’t know what they are.

    Goldman used two methods to hide the mess they were selling. First, they bundled hundreds of different mortgages into instruments called Collateralized Debt Obligations. Then they sold investors on the idea that, because a bunch of those mortgages would turn out to be OK, there was no reason to worry so much about the shitty ones: The CDO, as a whole, was sound. Thus, junk-rated mortgages were turned into AAA-rated investments. Second, to hedge its own bets, Goldman got companies like AIG to provide insurance — known as credit default swaps — on the CDOs. The swaps were essentially a racetrack bet between AIG and Goldman: Goldman is betting the ex-cons will default, AIG is betting they won’t.

    There was only one problem with the deals: All of the wheeling and dealing represented exactly the kind of dangerous speculation that federal regulators are supposed to rein in. Derivatives like CDOs and credit swaps had already caused a series of serious financial calamities: Procter & Gamble and Gibson Greetings both lost fortunes, and Orange County, California, was forced to default in 1994. A report that year by the Government Accountability Office recommended that such financial instruments be tightly regulated — and in 1998, the head of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, a woman named Brooksley Born, agreed. That May, she circulated a letter to business leaders and the Clinton administration suggesting that banks be required to provide greater disclosure in derivatives trades, and maintain reserves to cushion against losses.

    More regulation wasn’t exactly what Goldman had in mind. “The banks go crazy — they want it stopped,” says Michael Greenberger, who worked for Born as director of trading and markets at the CFTC and is now a law professor at the University of Maryland. “Greenspan, Summers, Rubin and [SEC chief Arthur] Levitt want it stopped.”

    Clinton’s reigning economic foursome — “especially Rubin,” according to Greenberger — called Born in for a meeting and pleaded their case. She refused to back down, however, and continued to push for more regulation of the derivatives. Then, in June 1998, Rubin went public to denounce her move, eventually recommending that Congress strip the CFTC of its regulatory authority. In 2000, on its last day in session, Congress passed the now-notorious Commodity Futures Modernization Act, which had been inserted into an 11,000-page spending bill at the last minute, with almost no debate on the floor of the Senate. Banks were now free to trade default swaps with impunity.

    But the story didn’t end there. AIG, a major purveyor of default swaps, approached the New York State Insurance Department in 2000 and asked whether default swaps would be regulated as insurance. At the time, the office was run by one Neil Levin, a former Goldman vice president, who decided against regulating the swaps. Now freed to underwrite as many housing-based securities and buy as much credit-default protection as it wanted, Goldman went berserk with lending lust. By the peak of the housing boom in 2006, Goldman was underwriting $76.5 billion worth of mortgage-backed securities — a third of which were sub-prime — much of it to institutional investors like pensions and insurance companies. And in these massive issues of real estate were vast swamps of crap.

    Take one $494 million issue that year, GSAMP Trust 2006S3. Many of the mortgages belonged to second-mortgage borrowers, and the average equity they had in their homes was 0.71 percent. Moreover, 58 percent of the loans included little or no documentation — no names of the borrowers, no addresses of the homes, just zip codes. Yet both of the major ratings agencies, Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s, rated 93 percent of the issue as investment grade. Moody’s projected that less than 10 percent of the loans would default. In reality, 18 percent of the mortgages were in default within 18 months.

    Not that Goldman was personally at any risk. The bank might be taking all these hideous, completely irresponsible mortgages from beneath-gangster-status firms like Countrywide and selling them off to municipalities and pensioners — old people, for God’s sake — pretending the whole time that it wasn’t grade D horseshit. But even as it was doing so, it was taking short positions in the same market, in essence betting against the same crap it was selling. Even worse, Goldman bragged about it in public. “The mortgage sector continues to be challenged,” David Viniar, the bank’s chief financial officer, boasted in 2007. “As a result, we took significant markdowns on our long inventory positions … However, our risk bias in that market was to be short, and that net short position was profitable.” In other words, the mortgages it was selling were for chumps. The real money was in betting against those same mortgages.

    “That’s how audacious these assholes are,” says one hedge fund manager. “At least with other banks, you could say that they were just dumb — they believed what they were selling, and it blew them up. Goldman knew what it was doing.”

    I ask the manager how it could be that selling something to customers that you’re actually betting against — particularly when you know more about the weaknesses of those products than the customer — doesn’t amount to securities fraud.

    “It’s exactly securities fraud,” he says. “It’s the heart of securities fraud.”

    Eventually, lots of aggrieved investors agreed. In a virtual repeat of the Internet IPO craze, Goldman was hit with a wave of lawsuits after the collapse of the housing bubble, many of which accused the bank of withholding pertinent information about the quality of the mortgages it issued. New York state regulators are suing Goldman and 25 other underwriters for selling bundles of crappy Countrywide mortgages to city and state pension funds, which lost as much as $100 million in the investments. Massachusetts also investigated Goldman for similar misdeeds, acting on behalf of 714 mortgage holders who got stuck holding predatory loans. But once again, Goldman got off virtually scot-free, staving off prosecution by agreeing to pay a paltry $60 million — about what the bank’s CDO division made in a day and a half during the real estate boom.

    The effects of the housing bubble are well known — it led more or less directly to the collapse of Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers and AIG, whose toxic portfolio of credit swaps was in significant part composed of the insurance that banks like Goldman bought against their own housing portfolios. In fact, at least $13 billion of the taxpayer money given to AIG in the bailout ultimately went to Goldman, meaning that the bank made out on the housing bubble twice: It fucked the investors who bought their horseshit CDOs by betting against its own crappy product, then it turned around and fucked the taxpayer by making him pay off those same bets.

    And once again, while the world was crashing down all around the bank, Goldman made sure it was doing just fine in the compensation department. In 2006, the firm’s payroll jumped to $16.5 billion — an average of $622,000 per employee. As a Goldman spokesman explained, “We work very hard here.”

    But the best was yet to come. While the collapse of the housing bubble sent most of the financial world fleeing for the exits, or to jail, Goldman boldly doubled down — and almost single-handedly created yet another bubble, one the world still barely knows the firm had anything to do with.

    BUBBLE #4 $4 a Gallon

    By the beginning of 2008, the financial world was in turmoil. Wall Street had spent the past two and a half decades producing one scandal after another, which didn’t leave much to sell that wasn’t tainted. The terms junk bond, IPO, sub-prime mortgage and other once-hot financial fare were now firmly associated in the public’s mind with scams; the terms credit swaps and CDOs were about to join them. The credit markets were in crisis, and the mantra that had sustained the fantasy economy throughout the Bush years — the notion that housing prices never go down — was now a fully exploded myth, leaving the Street clamoring for a new bullshit paradigm to sling.

    Where to go? With the public reluctant to put money in anything that felt like a paper investment, the Street quietly moved the casino to the physical-commodities market — stuff you could touch: corn, coffee, cocoa, wheat and, above all, energy commodities, especially oil. In conjunction with a decline in the dollar, the credit crunch and the housing crash caused a “flight to commodities.” Oil futures in particular skyrocketed, as the price of a single barrel went from around $60 in the middle of 2007 to a high of $147 in the summer of 2008.

    That summer, as the presidential campaign heated up, the accepted explanation for why gasoline had hit $4.11 a gallon was that there was a problem with the world oil supply. In a classic example of how Republicans and Democrats respond to crises by engaging in fierce exchanges of moronic irrelevancies, John McCain insisted that ending the moratorium on offshore drilling would be “very helpful in the short term,” while Barack Obama in typical liberal-arts yuppie style argued that federal investment in hybrid cars was the way out.

    But it was all a lie. While the global supply of oil will eventually dry up, the short-term flow has actually been increasing. In the six months before prices spiked, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, the world oil supply rose from 85.24 million barrels a day to 85.72 million. Over the same period, world oil demand dropped from 86.82 million barrels a day to 86.07 million. Not only was the short-term supply of oil rising, the demand for it was falling — which, in classic economic terms, should have brought prices at the pump down.

    So what caused the huge spike in oil prices? Take a wild guess. Obviously Goldman had help — there were other players in the physical commodities market — but the root cause had almost everything to do with the behavior of a few powerful actors determined to turn the once-solid market into a speculative casino. Goldman did it by persuading pension funds and other large institutional investors to invest in oil futures — agreeing to buy oil at a certain price on a fixed date. The push transformed oil from a physical commodity, rigidly subject to supply and demand, into something to bet on, like a stock. Between 2003 and 2008, the amount of speculative money in commodities grew from $13 billion to $317 billion, an increase of 2,300 percent. By 2008, a barrel of oil was traded 27 times, on average, before it was actually delivered and consumed.

    As is so often the case, there had been a Depression-era law in place designed specifically to prevent this sort of thing. The commodities market was designed in large part to help farmers: A grower concerned about future price drops could enter into a contract to sell his corn at a certain price for delivery later on, which made him worry less about building up stores of his crop. When no one was buying corn, the farmer could sell to a middleman known as a “traditional speculator,” who would store the grain and sell it later, when demand returned. That way, someone was always there to buy from the farmer, even when the market temporarily had no need for his crops.

    In 1936, however, Congress recognized that there should never be more speculators in the market than real producers and consumers. If that happened, prices would be affected by something other than supply and demand, and price manipulations would ensue. A new law empowered the Commodity Futures Trading Commission — the very same body that would later try and fail to regulate credit swaps — to place limits on speculative trades in commodities. As a result of the CFTC’s oversight, peace and harmony reigned in the commodities markets for more than 50 years.

    All that changed in 1991 when, unbeknownst to almost everyone in the world, a Goldman-owned commodities-trading subsidiary called J. Aron wrote to the CFTC and made an unusual argument. Farmers with big stores of corn, Goldman argued, weren’t the only ones who needed to hedge their risk against future price drops — Wall Street dealers who made big bets on oil prices also needed to hedge their risk, because, well, they stood to lose a lot too.

    This was complete and utter crap — the 1936 law, remember, was specifically designed to maintain distinctions between people who were buying and selling real tangible stuff and people who were trading in paper alone. But the CFTC, amazingly, bought Goldman’s argument. It issued the bank a free pass, called the “Bona Fide Hedging” exemption, allowing Goldman’s subsidiary to call itself a physical hedger and escape virtually all limits placed on speculators. In the years that followed, the commission would quietly issue 14 similar exemptions to other companies.

    Now Goldman and other banks were free to drive more investors into the commodities markets, enabling speculators to place increasingly big bets. That 1991 letter from Goldman more or less directly led to the oil bubble in 2008, when the number of speculators in the market — driven there by fear of the falling dollar and the housing crash — finally overwhelmed the real physical suppliers and consumers. By 2008, at least three quarters of the activity on the commodity exchanges was speculative, according to a congressional staffer who studied the numbers — and that’s likely a conservative estimate. By the middle of last summer, despite rising supply and a drop in demand, we were paying $4 a gallon every time we pulled up to the pump.

    What is even more amazing is that the letter to Goldman, along with most of the other trading exemptions, was handed out more or less in secret. “I was the head of the division of trading and markets, and Brooksley Born was the chair of the CFTC,” says Greenberger, “and neither of us knew this letter was out there.” In fact, the letters only came to light by accident. Last year, a staffer for the House Energy and Commerce Committee just happened to be at a briefing when officials from the CFTC made an offhand reference to the exemptions.

    “I had been invited to a briefing the commission was holding on energy,” the staffer recounts. “And suddenly in the middle of it, they start saying, ‘Yeah, we’ve been issuing these letters for years now.’ I raised my hand and said, ‘Really? You issued a letter? Can I see it?’ And they were like, ‘Duh, duh.’ So we went back and forth, and finally they said, ‘We have to clear it with Goldman Sachs.’ I’m like, ‘What do you mean, you have to clear it with Goldman Sachs?’”

    The CFTC cited a rule that prohibited it from releasing any information about a company’s current position in the market. But the staffer’s request was about a letter that had been issued 17 years earlier. It no longer had anything to do with Goldman’s current position. What’s more, Section 7 of the 1936 commodities law gives Congress the right to any information it wants from the commission. Still, in a classic example of how complete Goldman’s capture of government is, the CFTC waited until it got clearance from the bank before it turned the letter over.

    Armed with the semi-secret government exemption, Goldman had become the chief designer of a giant commodities betting parlor. Its Goldman Sachs Commodities Index — which tracks the prices of 24 major commodities but is overwhelmingly weighted toward oil — became the place where pension funds and insurance companies and other institutional investors could make massive long-term bets on commodity prices. Which was all well and good, except for a couple of things. One was that index speculators are mostly “long only” bettors, who seldom if ever take short positions — meaning they only bet on prices to rise. While this kind of behavior is good for a stock market, it’s terrible for commodities, because it continually forces prices upward. “If index speculators took short positions as well as long ones, you’d see them pushing prices both up and down,” says Michael Masters, a hedge fund manager who has helped expose the role of investment banks in the manipulation of oil prices. “But they only push prices in one direction: up.”

    Complicating matters even further was the fact that Goldman itself was cheerleading with all its might for an increase in oil prices. In the beginning of 2008, Arjun Murti, a Goldman analyst, hailed as an “oracle of oil” by The New York Times, predicted a “super spike” in oil prices, forecasting a rise to $200 a barrel. At the time Goldman was heavily invested in oil through its commodities trading subsidiary, J. Aron; it also owned a stake in a major oil refinery in Kansas, where it warehoused the crude it bought and sold. Even though the supply of oil was keeping pace with demand, Murti continually warned of disruptions to the world oil supply, going so far as to broadcast the fact that he owned two hybrid cars. High prices, the bank insisted, were somehow the fault of the piggish American consumer; in 2005, Goldman analysts insisted that we wouldn’t know when oil prices would fall until we knew “when American consumers will stop buying gas-guzzling sport utility vehicles and instead seek fuel-efficient alternatives.”

    But it wasn’t the consumption of real oil that was driving up prices — it was the trade in paper oil. By the summer of 2008, in fact, commodities speculators had bought and stockpiled enough oil futures to fill 1.1 billion barrels of crude, which meant that speculators owned more future oil on paper than there was real, physical oil stored in all of the country’s commercial storage tanks and the Strategic Petroleum Reserve combined. It was a repeat of both the Internet craze and the housing bubble, when Wall Street jacked up present-day profits by selling suckers shares of a fictional fantasy future of endlessly rising prices.

    In what was by now a painfully familiar pattern, the oil-commodities melon hit the pavement hard in the summer of 2008, causing a massive loss of wealth; crude prices plunged from $147 to $33. Once again the big losers were ordinary people. The pensioners whose funds invested in this crap got massacred: CalPERS, the California Public Employees’ Retirement System, had $1.1 billion in commodities when the crash came. And the damage didn’t just come from oil. Soaring food prices driven by the commodities bubble led to catastrophes across the planet, forcing an estimated 100 million people into hunger and sparking food riots throughout the Third World.

    Now oil prices are rising again: They shot up 20 percent in the month of May and have nearly doubled so far this year. Once again, the problem is not supply or demand. “The highest supply of oil in the last 20 years is now,” says Rep. Bart Stupak, a Democrat from Michigan who serves on the House energy committee. “Demand is at a 10-year low. And yet prices are up.”

    Asked why politicians continue to harp on things like drilling or hybrid cars, when supply and demand have nothing to do with the high prices, Stupak shakes his head. “I think they just don’t understand the problem very well,” he says. “You can’t explain it in 30 seconds, so politicians ignore it.”

    BUBBLE #5 Rigging the Bailout

    After the oil bubble collapsed last fall, there was no new bubble to keep things humming — this time, the money seems to be really gone, like worldwide-depression gone. So the financial safari has moved elsewhere, and the big game in the hunt has become the only remaining pool of dumb, unguarded capital left to feed upon: taxpayer money. Here, in the biggest bailout in history, is where Goldman Sachs really started to flex its muscle.

    It began in September of last year, when then-Treasury secretary Paulson made a momentous series of decisions. Although he had already engineered a rescue of Bear Stearns a few months before and helped bail out quasi-private lenders Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, Paulson elected to let Lehman Brothers — one of Goldman’s last real competitors — collapse without intervention. (“Goldman’s superhero status was left intact,” says market analyst Eric Salzman, “and an investment banking competitor, Lehman, goes away.”) The very next day, Paulson green-lighted a massive, $85 billion bailout of AIG, which promptly turned around and repaid $13 billion it owed to Goldman. Thanks to the rescue effort, the bank ended up getting paid in full for its bad bets: By contrast, retired auto workers awaiting the Chrysler bailout will be lucky to receive 50 cents for every dollar they are owed.

    Immediately after the AIG bailout, Paulson announced his federal bailout for the financial industry, a $700 billion plan called the Troubled Asset Relief Program, and put a heretofore unknown 35-year-old Goldman banker named Neel Kashkari in charge of administering the funds. In order to qualify for bailout monies, Goldman announced that it would convert from an investment bank to a bank holding company, a move that allows it access not only to $10 billion in TARP funds, but to a whole galaxy of less conspicuous, publicly backed funding — most notably, lending from the discount window of the Federal Reserve. By the end of March, the Fed will have lent or guaranteed at least $8.7 trillion under a series of new bailout programs — and thanks to an obscure law allowing the Fed to block most congressional audits, both the amounts and the recipients of the monies remain almost entirely secret.

    Converting to a bank-holding company has other benefits as well: Goldman’s primary supervisor is now the New York Fed, whose chairman at the time of its announcement was Stephen Friedman, a former co-chairman of Goldman Sachs. Friedman was technically in violation of Federal Reserve policy by remaining on the board of Goldman even as he was supposedly regulating the bank; in order to rectify the problem, he applied for, and got, a conflict of interest waiver from the government. Friedman was also supposed to divest himself of his Goldman stock after Goldman became a bank holding company, but thanks to the waiver, he was allowed to go out and buy 52,000 additional shares in his old bank, leaving him $3 million richer. Friedman stepped down in May, but the man now in charge of supervising Goldman — New York Fed president William Dudley — is yet another former Goldmanite.

    The collective message of all this — the AIG bailout, the swift approval for its bank holding conversion, the TARP funds — is that when it comes to Goldman Sachs, there isn’t a free market at all. The government might let other players on the market die, but it simply will not allow Goldman to fail under any circumstances. Its edge in the market has suddenly become an open declaration of supreme privilege. “In the past it was an implicit advantage,” says Simon Johnson, an economics professor at MIT and former official at the International Monetary Fund, who compares the bailout to the crony capitalism he has seen in Third World countries. “Now it’s more of an explicit advantage.”

    Once the bailouts were in place, Goldman went right back to business as usual, dreaming up impossibly convoluted schemes to pick the American carcass clean of its loose capital. One of its first moves in the post-bailout era was to quietly push forward the calendar it uses to report its earnings, essentially wiping December 2008 — with its $1.3 billion in pretax losses — off the books. At the same time, the bank announced a highly suspicious $1.8 billion profit for the first quarter of 2009 — which apparently included a large chunk of money funneled to it by taxpayers via the AIG bailout. “They cooked those first quarter results six ways from Sunday,” says one hedge fund manager. “They hid the losses in the orphan month and called the bailout money profit.”

    Two more numbers stand out from that stunning first-quarter turnaround. The bank paid out an astonishing $4.7 billion in bonuses and compensation in the first three months of this year, an 18 percent increase over the first quarter of 2008. It also raised $5 billion by issuing new shares almost immediately after releasing its first quarter results. Taken together, the numbers show that Goldman essentially borrowed a $5 billion salary payout for its executives in the middle of the global economic crisis it helped cause, using half-baked accounting to reel in investors, just months after receiving billions in a taxpayer bailout.

    Even more amazing, Goldman did it all right before the government announced the results of its new “stress test” for banks seeking to repay TARP money — suggesting that Goldman knew exactly what was coming. The government was trying to carefully orchestrate the repayments in an effort to prevent further trouble at banks that couldn’t pay back the money right away. But Goldman blew off those concerns, brazenly flaunting its insider status. “They seemed to know everything that they needed to do before the stress test came out, unlike everyone else, who had to wait until after,” says Michael Hecht, a managing director of JMP Securities. “The government came out and said, ‘To pay back TARP, you have to issue debt of at least five years that is not insured by FDIC — which Goldman Sachs had already done, a week or two before.”

    And here’s the real punch line. After playing an intimate role in four historic bubble catastrophes, after helping $5 trillion in wealth disappear from the NASDAQ, after pawning off thousands of toxic mortgages on pensioners and cities, after helping to drive the price of gas up to $4 a gallon and to push 100 million people around the world into hunger, after securing tens of billions of taxpayer dollars through a series of bailouts overseen by its former CEO, what did Goldman Sachs give back to the people of the United States in 2008?

    Fourteen million dollars.

    That is what the firm paid in taxes in 2008, an effective tax rate of exactly one, read it, one percent. The bank paid out $10 billion in compensation and benefits that same year and made a profit of more than $2 billion — yet it paid the Treasury less than a third of what it forked over to CEO Lloyd Blankfein, who made $42.9 million last year.

    How is this possible? According to Goldman’s annual report, the low taxes are due in large part to changes in the bank’s “geographic earnings mix.” In other words, the bank moved its money around so that most of its earnings took place in foreign countries with low tax rates. Thanks to our completely fucked corporate tax system, companies like Goldman can ship their revenues offshore and defer taxes on those revenues indefinitely, even while they claim deductions upfront on that same untaxed income. This is why any corporation with an at least occasionally sober accountant can usually find a way to zero out its taxes. A GAO report, in fact, found that between 1998 and 2005, roughly two-thirds of all corporations operating in the U.S. paid no taxes at all.

    This should be a pitchfork-level outrage — but somehow, when Goldman released its post-bailout tax profile, hardly anyone said a word. One of the few to remark on the obscenity was Rep. Lloyd Doggett, a Democrat from Texas who serves on the House Ways and Means Committee. “With the right hand out begging for bailout money,” he said, “the left is hiding it offshore.”

    BUBBLE #6 Global Warming

    Fast-forward to today. It’s early June in Washington, D.C. Barack Obama, a popular young politician whose leading private campaign donor was an investment bank called Goldman Sachs — its employees paid some $981,000 to his campaign — sits in the White House. Having seamlessly navigated the political minefield of the bailout era, Goldman is once again back to its old business, scouting out loopholes in a new government-created market with the aid of a new set of alumni occupying key government jobs.

    Gone are Hank Paulson and Neel Kashkari; in their place are Treasury chief of staff Mark Patterson and CFTC chief Gary Gensler, both former Goldmanites. (Gensler was the firm’s co-head of finance.) And instead of credit derivatives or oil futures or mortgage-backed CDOs, the new game in town, the next bubble, is in carbon credits — a booming trillion dollar market that barely even exists yet, but will if the Democratic Party that it gave $4,452,585 to in the last election manages to push into existence a groundbreaking new commodities bubble, disguised as an “environmental plan,” called cap-and-trade.

    The new carbon credit market is a virtual repeat of the commodities-market casino that’s been kind to Goldman, except it has one delicious new wrinkle: If the plan goes forward as expected, the rise in prices will be government-mandated. Goldman won’t even have to rig the game. It will be rigged in advance.

    Here’s how it works: If the bill passes, there will be limits for coal plants, utilities, natural-gas distributors and numerous other industries on the amount of carbon emissions (a.k.a. greenhouse gases) they can produce per year. If the companies go over their allotment, they will be able to buy “allocations” or credits from other companies that have managed to produce fewer emissions. President Obama conservatively estimates that about $646 billion worth of carbon credits will be auctioned in the first seven years; one of his top economic aides speculates that the real number might be twice or even three times that amount.

    The feature of this plan that has special appeal to speculators is that the “cap” on carbon will be continually lowered by the government, which means that carbon credits will become more and more scarce with each passing year. Which means that this is a brand new commodities market where the main commodity to be traded is guaranteed to rise in price over time. The volume of this new market will be upwards of a trillion dollars annually; for comparison’s sake, the annual combined revenues of all electricity suppliers in the U.S. total $320 billion.

    Goldman wants this bill. The plan is (1) to get in on the ground floor of paradigm-shifting legislation, (2) make sure that they’re the profit-making slice of that paradigm and (3) make sure the slice is a big slice. Goldman started pushing hard for cap-and-trade long ago, but things really ramped up last year when the firm spent $3.5 million to lobby climate issues. (One of their lobbyists at the time was none other than Patterson, now Treasury chief of staff.) Back in 2005, when Hank Paulson was chief of Goldman, he personally helped author the bank’s environmental policy, a document that contains some surprising elements for a firm that in all other areas has been consistently opposed to any sort of government regulation. Paulson’s report argued that “voluntary action alone cannot solve the climate change problem.” A few years later, the bank’s carbon chief, Ken Newcombe, insisted that cap-and-trade alone won’t be enough to fix the climate problem and called for further public investments in research and development. Which is convenient, considering that Goldman made early investments in wind power (it bought a subsidiary called Horizon Wind Energy), renewable diesel (it is an investor in a firm called Changing World Technologies) and solar power (it partnered with BP Solar), exactly the kind of deals that will prosper if the government forces energy producers to use cleaner energy. As Paulson said at the time, “We’re not making those investments to lose money.”

    The bank owns a 10 percent stake in the Chicago Climate Exchange, where the carbon credits will be traded. Moreover, Goldman owns a minority stake in Blue Source LLC, a Utah-based firm that sells carbon credits of the type that will be in great demand if the bill passes. Nobel Prize winner Al Gore, who is intimately involved with the planning of cap-and-trade, started up a company called Generation Investment Management with three former bigwigs from Goldman Sachs Asset Management, David Blood, Mark Ferguson and Peter Harris. Their business? Investing in carbon offsets. There’s also a $500 million Green Growth Fund set up by a Goldmanite to invest in green-tech … the list goes on and on. Goldman is ahead of the headlines again, just waiting for someone to make it rain in the right spot. Will this market be bigger than the energy futures market?

    “Oh, it’ll dwarf it,” says a former staffer on the House energy committee.

    Well, you might say, who cares? If cap-and-trade succeeds, won’t we all be saved from the catastrophe of global warming? Maybe — but cap-and-trade, as envisioned by Goldman, is really just a carbon tax structured so that private interests collect the revenues. Instead of simply imposing a fixed government levy on carbon pollution and forcing unclean energy producers to pay for the mess they make, cap-and-trade will allow a small tribe of greedy-as-hell Wall Street swine to turn yet another commodities market into a private tax collection scheme. This is worse than the bailout: It allows the bank to seize taxpayer money before it’s even collected.

    “If it’s going to be a tax, I would prefer that Washington set the tax and collect it,” says Michael Masters, the hedge fund director who spoke out against oil futures speculation. “But we’re saying that Wall Street can set the tax, and Wall Street can collect the tax. That’s the last thing in the world I want. It’s just asinine.”

    Cap-and-trade is going to happen. Or, if it doesn’t, something like it will. The moral is the same as for all the other bubbles that Goldman helped create, from 1929 to 2009. In almost every case, the very same bank that behaved recklessly for years, weighing down the system with toxic loans and predatory debt, and accomplishing nothing but massive bonuses for a few bosses, has been rewarded with mountains of virtually free money and government guarantees — while the actual victims in this mess, ordinary taxpayers, are the ones paying for it.

    It’s not always easy to accept the reality of what we now routinely allow these people to get away with; there’s a kind of collective denial that kicks in when a country goes through what America has gone through lately, when a people lose as much prestige and status as we have in the past few years. You can’t really register the fact that you’re no longer a citizen of a thriving first-world democracy, that you’re no longer above getting robbed in broad daylight, because like an amputee, you can still sort of feel things that are no longer there.

    But this is it. This is the world we live in now. And in this world, some of us have to play by the rules, while others get a note from the principal excusing them from homework till the end of time, plus 10 billion free dollars in a paper bag to buy lunch. It’s a gangster state, running on gangster economics, and even prices can’t be trusted anymore; there are hidden taxes in every buck you pay. And maybe we can’t stop it, but we should at least know where it’s all going.

    This article originally appeared in the July 9-23, 2009 of Rolling Stone.

    https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/the-great-american-bubble-machine-195229/

    • Thanks: Bashibuzuk
  593. @QCIC
    @Mr. Hack

    I watched the video before commenting. Do you have a link to an English translation of the paper? Based on a quick glance at some of his online articles I think Inozemtsev has long had an anti-Kremlin stance so his views are consistent with that. Is he one of the so-called Atlanticists?

    His ability to publish what was summarized in the video suggests the Russian press is more free than some commenters would have us believe :)

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    I came across the video quite accidentally on YouTube. I haven’t actually read the paper in any language, but thought that the video did a good job of summarising and including quotes from the paper.

    His ability to publish what was summarized in the video suggests the Russian press is more free than some commenters would have us believe 🙂

    I’d have to agree with you. As I originally pointed out:

    I actually can’t believe that his report (or Inozemtsev himself) wasn’t buried somewhere.

    I understand that things come hard and fast at this blogsite, so I’m going to reprint the YouTube clip to see if anybody else here knows anything about Inozemtsev:

    • Replies: @Philip Owen
    @Mr. Hack

    This blog is more than the presenter. The research that goes into these videos is considerable. At the least someone is researching in the Russian language. I use an AI to filter Russian language website stories for news relevant to trade and investment. I screen 500 stories a day. This is on an even bigger scale and the video scripts are written and recorded as well. He has also been carefully selected as a presesnter, well spoken with a Northern (trustworthy) accent.

  594. @Bashibuzuk
    @Barbarossa

    We cannot detach from God. God is the ground of being on which our existences unfold. The best argument for God's being (as distinguished from our existence) that I ever read was perhaps the following Ismaili blog post:

    https://ismailignosis.com/2014/03/27/he-who-is-above-all-else-the-strongest-argument-for-the-existence-of-god/

    It is exceptional in that it is entirely aligned with classical Greek philosophy. This is of course not surprising, given that Ismaili were originally Islamic Neoplatonicists.

    Now, they should have not used the word "existence" instead of "being" when writing about God. Existence is always being in relation to and outside of something else. God is, while his Creation exists. But that's semantics for the majority of people anyways.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    We cannot detach from God. God is the ground of being on which our existences unfold.

    I’m very pleased to hear that you seem to be returning to your religious roots, that is Orthodox Christianity.

    It is exceptional in that it is entirely aligned with classical Greek philosophy. This is of course not surprising, given that Ismaili were originally Islamic Neoplatonicists.

    Since you seem to exceptionally value classical Greek philosophy and neoplatonic thought, than you must surely value Orthodoxy too.

    • Replies: @Bashibuzuk
    @Mr. Hack

    Orthodox Christianity is a beautiful religious tradition. It has many spiritual gifts to offer those who partake in it. I have the highest esteem of Orthodoxy, especially its Old Believer denominations, which have avoided the Nikonian reforms and stood steadfast in their protection of the Russian religious heritage, despute all the persecution that has been directed against them by Romanovs' dynasty Westernizers and their Bolshevik successors.

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/71/Mikhail_Nesterov_001_crop1.jpg

    https://uploads4.wikiart.org/images/mikhail-nesterov/venerable-sergius-of-radonezh-1899.jpg

    https://img-fotki.yandex.ru/get/5411/161887320.6d/0_188481_2d675c0c_orig.jpg

    https://pravlife.org/sites/default/files/styles/article_575/public/field/image/sergii_radonezhsky_po_rusi_efoshkin_.jpg

    https://cdn.gallerix.asia/sr/_RUS/754133413/1369833557.jpg

    Unfortunately, I have no Old Believer ancestors. Conversion to Old Believer tradition is a very complex process and there are no Old Believer parishes where I live.

    Moreover, I am quite heterodox, bordering on heretical, by any Christian standards. Therefore, I will keep admiring Orthodox Faith from a respectful distance.

    However, God willing, each time I would go to Moscow (where I haven't been since 2018), I would as usual donate to the Church that I have been baptized into, a beautiful early seventeenth century temple that still needs a lot of renovation work after years of Sovok neglect and disrepair.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    , @Dmitry
    @Mr. Hack


    returning to your religious roots

     

    All abrahamic religion in Russia is not the deepest religious roots, as it has 40 generations since the rulers assimilated the exotic new religion superficially (for example, Christianity by Kiev rulers and Islam in ancestors of Tatars), but the assimilation to the population has been uneven and narrowly controlled. Still, the old gods had retreated to the forest, and did not have difficulty to re-appear in local stories and customs, which would often not be written until the 19th century.

    When a religion is developed for more than thousand years before it is taken to the country, it is like if Japan would become Islamic now, and the Japanese gods would have to follow the writing of Arabs more thousand years earlier.

    The religion has been developed by other people for thousands of years in a exotic different world. You don't have access to the source code. You are given a licensed copy of the software and you can learn to read it, but many of the features have been disabled.

    In addition, it's only the rulers who have local administrator access to the software and they don't allow the normal people to learn to read the code.

    When there is a software update that is perceived as downgrade by some in the 17th century and which has removed local customizations, but which allows the rulers to increase their control of the features , the people who want to continue to use older version of the software are being killed and viewed as rebels against the state.

    When ordinary people learn to read the manual, they try to program their own version, and can be persecuted as heretic likes the Molokans.

    This isn't to say that assimilating the foreign software is negative. It opens to the information and culture network of the other users, which can include the much of the world's knowledge and wisdom.

    Especially with Christianity, when the country adopted the religion, it plugged you into the common information space of Europe which (unlike Islam) developed the civilization of modern world of second millennium, the institutions for learning, the lingua franca. It's connecting as even distant node in the networks which were used for renaissance, scientific revolution and enlightenment.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

  595. @silviosilver
    @Beckow

    Based on this logic, you should have been calling for Russia to invade even before Russia did. Can you (or someone) refresh my memory: were you indeed calling for Russia to invade before the invasion?


    My question was what was Russia supposed to do about Nato moving into Ukraine and Kiev government (and obviously a large part of Ukie society) suppressing the rights of Russians in Ukraine, closing schools, banning Russian in offices, bombing them.
     
    "What was Germany supposed to do about British and French support for Poland and the Warsaw government (and obviously a large part of Polack society) suppressing the rights of Germans in Poland, closing schools, banning German, bombing them."

    You support the one but treat the other as heinous and I struggle to see what real difference between them is.

    Replies: @Beckow

    …calling for Russia to invade even before Russia did

    No, until the very end – till February – there was a viable compromise: Minsk deal gave Russians in Ukraine some autonomy and an offer by Nato to freeze or cancel plans for Nato in Ukraine. It was not done. For two crucial months pre-war Nato refused to engage and repeated ad nauseam that ‘Kiev is sovereign and can do what they want‘. To pretend that the deal wasn’t available for Kiev-Nato is simply lying. The details were hard, there was no trust, but the war is much worse.

    What was Germany supposed to do about British and French support for Poland and the Warsaw government

    There are more differences than similarities: Germany had an announced plan to take and settle territories in the east (Lebensraum), Poland wasn’t going to be the end. Poland didn’t ban German language in schools, they did suppress the German minority, but stayed within limits. And Nazis were just different – let’s not argue obvious things. But I agree that Poland acted aggressively and stupidly: complete rights for Germans (and Ukies) were ok. And the infamous corridor was a reasonable request.

    My opposition to Germany in WW2 stems from their heinous behavior in the war – especially in the east, incl. in my country. It was uncivilized. The pre-WW2 situation was complex and if Nazis were not Nazis and some in the West didn’t want the war so badly, it may have been avoided. Germans had valid points.

    Russia is no shape or form like Nazi Germany of late 30’s. People who say it is are morons. There was a way to address this without challenging Russia to dare to invade. Once they did, all bets are off, and we are all much, much worse off.

    If you want to move a bear, the bear has to agree – that was obvious from the start.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @Beckow

    The general argument is that when Hitler rolled into Prague he was making a fool of Chamberlain and couldn't stick to a deal. Also that Danzig made it impossible for Poland to trade with the world from a real sea port so they were being turned into a landlocked rump.


    That's the main thing.


    But also for Chamberlain or Churchill later, Germany was fundamentally in a weak geographical position. We (British) could beat them with various European and international coalitions.


    I'm not sure Russia is so weak. It's got a lot of gifts and reserves unlike Germany which was a one hit wonder.

    Replies: @Beckow

  596. @Mr. Hack
    @Bashibuzuk


    while RusFedians would face immense hardships of their own: social, economic and demographic as well.
     
    It's coming sooner than what you may think. One of Russia's main economists, Vladislav Inozemtsev, recently put out this damning report. I actually can't believe that his report (or Inozemtsev himself) wasn't buried somewhere. Please watch this clip and let me know what you think. Very interesting.

    https://youtu.be/QMRn7jx7JqA

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk, @QCIC, @Mike_from_Russia

    Just look at the list of videos of this channel. And it will immediately become obvious that this is a paid propagandist and nothing more

  597. Bashibuzuk says:
    @Mr. Hack
    @Bashibuzuk


    We cannot detach from God. God is the ground of being on which our existences unfold.
     
    I'm very pleased to hear that you seem to be returning to your religious roots, that is Orthodox Christianity.

    It is exceptional in that it is entirely aligned with classical Greek philosophy. This is of course not surprising, given that Ismaili were originally Islamic Neoplatonicists.

     

    Since you seem to exceptionally value classical Greek philosophy and neoplatonic thought, than you must surely value Orthodoxy too.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk, @Dmitry

    Orthodox Christianity is a beautiful religious tradition. It has many spiritual gifts to offer those who partake in it. I have the highest esteem of Orthodoxy, especially its Old Believer denominations, which have avoided the Nikonian reforms and stood steadfast in their protection of the Russian religious heritage, despute all the persecution that has been directed against them by Romanovs’ dynasty Westernizers and their Bolshevik successors.

    [MORE]


    Unfortunately, I have no Old Believer ancestors. Conversion to Old Believer tradition is a very complex process and there are no Old Believer parishes where I live.

    Moreover, I am quite heterodox, bordering on heretical, by any Christian standards. Therefore, I will keep admiring Orthodox Faith from a respectful distance.

    However, God willing, each time I would go to Moscow (where I haven’t been since 2018), I would as usual donate to the Church that I have been baptized into, a beautiful early seventeenth century temple that still needs a lot of renovation work after years of Sovok neglect and disrepair.

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @Bashibuzuk

    The last that I remember, you seemed to be following some sort of Buddhist path. But now you seem to be talking about God, and in very affirmative ways?...this is why I thought that you were finding your way back to the church in which you were baptised? It's clear that you weren't baptised into an Old Believer's church, so it was probably a mainline ROC church? And even if you have some sort of qualms with the ROC, can't you find something close bye that would be amenable to your conscience, Greek, Serbian or even Ukrainian (your Grandfather, after all was fiery Ukrainian)? John Chrysostom
    reminds us that God's warm embrace is open to converts until midnight. You wouldn't be considered a convert, already having been baptised, but now a fallen away soul. And so many of us have at one time or another fallen away. Time to return to the flock, repent and take part in Holy Communion?...

  598. @Mikel
    @Coconuts


    Understanding of evolution and human evolution specifically raises questions about how plausible the advent of this universal state of pacification is. Possibly it is not even a possibility given the kind of animal humans are.
     
    You are probably right but the fact that there seems to be a positive correlation between the development of a country and the willingness of its inhabitants to kill or die for beliefs may be telling us something perhaps positive about human nature too.

    Granted, these people don't much care when the professional armies of their countries do engage in pointless wars far away and may even be supportive of them, given an adequate informative conditioning (or for the simple reason of supporting their national team, so to speak). But less people willing to go to war should lead to less wars, all else being equal. In fact, how much do even professional soldiers fight for beliefs these days? I don't think that most of them would go to war as unpaid volunteers so not much, probably.

    Another important point raised by Beckow is that historically it has been a minority at the top who have decided to start wars, especially the most ideological ones. The masses have always been brainwashed and/or directly forced to take part in the hostilities. Past the tribal state, most people probably prefer to lead peaceful lives rather than to fight enemies. Beckow then goes on a contradictory tangent with the strange claim that the Russians just had no choice but to engage in the wholesale killing of Russophones that they're now carrying out in Eastern Ukraine but that is another matter.

    Replies: @sudden death, @Beckow, @Coconuts, @Coconuts

    Another important point raised by Beckow is that historically it has been a minority at the top who have decided to start wars, especially the most ideological ones. The masses have always been brainwashed and/or directly forced to take part in the hostilities.

    I think the argument against this would be that it is restating the idea that a particular political formula can put an end to the emergence of the friend/enemy distinction within human groups.

    The formula here seems to be one that involves rooting out what its exponents identify as ideology and isolating the minority groups they deem to be engaged in distorting the default norm of human behaviour for unjustifiable ends. The natural or undistorted human norm is taken to be some state of pacification where people don’t divide themselves into groups that start opposing each other.

    This sounds broadly similar to some of the arguments of liberalism. But ideas like this tend to give rise to a new friend/enemy distinction of their own. This is between those who place their trust in the authority of the promoters of the liberal style accounts of human nature and those who don’t (who might end up being identified as the enemies of humanity).

    In liberalism there might be supplementary assumptions following from the initial ones involving spontaneous egalitarian mass participation in decision making as the human norm, the idea that society is composed of rational individuals who will inevitably reach a consensus based on universal altruistic reason etc.

    There is a kind of reverse or mirror account to the one about the corruptibility of the minority leading to conflict, the idea of the corruptibility of the majority. From this point of view once a larger society forms it will demand (and reward) leadership by a minority, but the general body of the society is likely to form a mass with a weak collective mind, no memory of the past, weak sense of the future, little sense of responsibility and always seeking maximum reward for the least effort. Leaders are forced to try to manage entropic tendencies of the mass at the same time as meeting its demands for gratification.

  599. Bashibuzuk says:
    @silviosilver
    @Bashibuzuk


    Most modern Abrahamic teachings are sub-par at explaining human suffering and the origin of our imperfections that are the main true source of our suffering either individual or communal.

    They basically blasphemously ascribe the imperfections in Creation to a most perfect God.
     

    "Blasphemously"? More like illogically. If God hates evil (or "sin") so much, then why did he create it? Why did he create a universe in which the very possibility of evil or sin exists? He didn't have to. He is God. He could have easily created a universe with no evil and no sin. He could have created a universe with no pain, too - which I can't help thinking would have been kinda nice.

    Well he is God and I am but a lowly man, so perhaps it's wrong for me to think I could ever understand his reasons. And maybe despite the fact that so much suffering seems unnecessary, God is still "good." But can we really say he is "perfect"? God might be good, but if I can imagine a better God - eg a God that did everything else the same, but he created 1% less suffering - doesn't that mean he is not the best possible God?

    "Possible" here is a thorny term - who knows whether such a God would have been "possible" - but it still creates difficulties for people who believe God is perfect. Can he really be perfect if people can imagine a more perfect God? After all, when we say "perfect" it's our ideas about what perfect means that we are referring to, so if we can come up with something more perfect and notice that the God doesn't live up to it, we can say he is less than perfect.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk, @Coconuts

    He could have easily created a universe with no evil and no sin. He could have created a universe with no pain, too – which I can’t help thinking would have been kinda nice.

    He has created a Universe (actually a Multiverse comprising possibly an infinite number of Universes) that allows his creatures an infinite potential of freedom and evolution.

    If he would have created the Universe that you describe, it would have been a “closed system” static in its perfection and therefore inferior to the “open system” that we are witnessing every single moment of our existence.

    He has shown us the way that would be best for us to follow to evolve towards Him and as rapidly as possible shed as much imperfection (that you call sin) as possible. We are free to follow this path now or to follow it later. He is anyway the Attractor that will hopefully bring all of us into him again.

    Freedom is worth the suffering, and possibility to evolve is worth the pain. At least from my subjective experience. And God knows best…

    • Replies: @silviosilver
    @Bashibuzuk


    He has created a Universe (actually a Multiverse comprising possibly an infinite number of Universes) that allows his creatures an infinite potential of freedom and evolution.
     
    I'm not so sure. It seems to me there are plenty of things I do not have the "potential" to do - fly like a bird, swim like a fish, regenerate limbs. So my potential may be great, but it is surely something less than "infinite." (Or maybe you were being poetic?)

    Or to get at the same point a little differently, how do know that our abilities, as we understand them, allow for infinite freedom - or the maximal freedom possible in this universe? Can we ever really be sure of that? Or are we just jumping to that conclusion because we want to praise God and this sounds like the sort of thing that would please him?

    Because if it's not actually true that we enjoy the maximal amount of freedom possible, then it opens up the possibility that the degree of suffering could in fact have been set at a lower point than the level we know, and we wouldn't necessarily lose any freedom as a result. In other words, we could be just as we are, have the same potential we have, but the level of suffering in the universe could be, say, 50% lower.


    He has shown us the way that would be best for us to follow to evolve towards Him and as rapidly as possible shed as much imperfection (that you call sin) as possible.
     
    I didn't invent the concept of sin. That's been passed down to us by Christian thinkers. God hates sin, they say. Hates it so much that, if you sin, he wants you out of his sight. Worse, seemingly vindictively, he'll torture you for an eternity if you commit sin. That's how much he hates it. But then why create it If you hate peanut butter, would you make yourself a peanut butter sandwich, and then complain to everyone at work how much you hate your lunch? Is that smart?

    And if you know everything, and you create a creature that you know is going to sin and displease you - because that's the way you made it - shouldn't you blame yourself rather than your creation for acting the way it does? Sorry if that sounds snarky, but these are questions I've never managed to answer to my satisfaction (and my bar is set pretty low; anything halfway plausible would put me at ease, or at least that's what I think).

    It seems to me that most (even all) these difficulties could be avoided by relaxing our assumptions about God's omnipotence, omniscience or omnibenevolent. Say there's something that seems logically possible, but God can't do it. Would that really be the end of the world? Or what if God doesn't actually know the future. Maybe he can predict it scarily accurately, but - crucially - less than 100% accurately. Or maybe he could know it if he wanted to, but he chooses not to (for reasons of his own - but maybe something like if you're watching the replay of a sportsball match, it's less exciting if you already know the outcome). Or maybe he's not quite as caring or loving as we've been led to think. This is the hardest one to swallow, but the easiest to reconcile with our experience of existence.

    Replies: @sudden death, @Dmitry, @Coconuts

  600. @Beckow
    @silviosilver


    ...calling for Russia to invade even before Russia did
     
    No, until the very end - till February - there was a viable compromise: Minsk deal gave Russians in Ukraine some autonomy and an offer by Nato to freeze or cancel plans for Nato in Ukraine. It was not done. For two crucial months pre-war Nato refused to engage and repeated ad nauseam that 'Kiev is sovereign and can do what they want'. To pretend that the deal wasn't available for Kiev-Nato is simply lying. The details were hard, there was no trust, but the war is much worse.

    What was Germany supposed to do about British and French support for Poland and the Warsaw government
     
    There are more differences than similarities: Germany had an announced plan to take and settle territories in the east (Lebensraum), Poland wasn't going to be the end. Poland didn't ban German language in schools, they did suppress the German minority, but stayed within limits. And Nazis were just different - let's not argue obvious things. But I agree that Poland acted aggressively and stupidly: complete rights for Germans (and Ukies) were ok. And the infamous corridor was a reasonable request.

    My opposition to Germany in WW2 stems from their heinous behavior in the war - especially in the east, incl. in my country. It was uncivilized. The pre-WW2 situation was complex and if Nazis were not Nazis and some in the West didn't want the war so badly, it may have been avoided. Germans had valid points.

    Russia is no shape or form like Nazi Germany of late 30's. People who say it is are morons. There was a way to address this without challenging Russia to dare to invade. Once they did, all bets are off, and we are all much, much worse off.

    If you want to move a bear, the bear has to agree - that was obvious from the start.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    The general argument is that when Hitler rolled into Prague he was making a fool of Chamberlain and couldn’t stick to a deal. Also that Danzig made it impossible for Poland to trade with the world from a real sea port so they were being turned into a landlocked rump.

    That’s the main thing.

    But also for Chamberlain or Churchill later, Germany was fundamentally in a weak geographical position. We (British) could beat them with various European and international coalitions.

    I’m not sure Russia is so weak. It’s got a lot of gifts and reserves unlike Germany which was a one hit wonder.

    • Replies: @Beckow
    @Wokechoke

    Agree with most of it, but what exactly was Chamberlain's choice in Munich? If UK-France attacked Germany from the west they would get bogged down into an unpopular, bloody war while Germany would dismantle Czech resistance (the estimate is 2-3 months). Cities would be destroyed, tens of thousands would die. And UK and French people were not ready to fight another war.

    Additionally, as happened soon after, Poland and Hungary would attack Czecho-Slovakia to grab their claimed territories. Munich was a betrayal, but even betrayals happen for a reason. It just turned out later that the reason wasn't very good or honorable.

  601. @silviosilver
    @Bashibuzuk


    Most modern Abrahamic teachings are sub-par at explaining human suffering and the origin of our imperfections that are the main true source of our suffering either individual or communal.

    They basically blasphemously ascribe the imperfections in Creation to a most perfect God.
     

    "Blasphemously"? More like illogically. If God hates evil (or "sin") so much, then why did he create it? Why did he create a universe in which the very possibility of evil or sin exists? He didn't have to. He is God. He could have easily created a universe with no evil and no sin. He could have created a universe with no pain, too - which I can't help thinking would have been kinda nice.

    Well he is God and I am but a lowly man, so perhaps it's wrong for me to think I could ever understand his reasons. And maybe despite the fact that so much suffering seems unnecessary, God is still "good." But can we really say he is "perfect"? God might be good, but if I can imagine a better God - eg a God that did everything else the same, but he created 1% less suffering - doesn't that mean he is not the best possible God?

    "Possible" here is a thorny term - who knows whether such a God would have been "possible" - but it still creates difficulties for people who believe God is perfect. Can he really be perfect if people can imagine a more perfect God? After all, when we say "perfect" it's our ideas about what perfect means that we are referring to, so if we can come up with something more perfect and notice that the God doesn't live up to it, we can say he is less than perfect.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk, @Coconuts

    “Possible” here is a thorny term – who knows whether such a God would have been “possible” – but it still creates difficulties for people who believe God is perfect. Can he really be perfect if people can imagine a more perfect God?

    Thinking about this is probably how the idea of a maximally perfect being arose, or the idea that God is infinitely perfect in every aspect of being.

    Well he is God and I am but a lowly man, so perhaps it’s wrong for me to think I could ever understand his reasons. And maybe despite the fact that so much suffering seems unnecessary, God is still “good.” But can we really say he is “perfect”? God might be good, but if I can imagine a better God – eg a God that did everything else the same, but he created 1% less suffering – doesn’t that mean he is not the best possible God?

    Often people defending the idea of God as a maximally perfect being, or perfect being itself etc. don’t use design arguments to do so. This is because it is not really possible to do it by trying to read attributes like perfection off opinions about how good a designer God is or whether he lives up to a particular conception of what a responsible moral agent would do (probably doing that is in itself illogical unless you are already a Kantian).

    • Replies: @Bashibuzuk
    @Coconuts

    God in my opinion must be seen as an Absolute transcending all limitations and categorizations.

    Even the sentence that I have just written is a somewhat absurd limitation that makes discussing God pointless.

    Even using the word God is limiting in a certain way.

    In early Christian thought this has been discussed by Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite.

    There can be no unambiguous epistemology of Godhood.

    That is why Zen / Ch'an practitioners are right about "words having no meaning" when we are trying to approach Reality in and of itself.

    In Sufi though an emphasis is made on the Islamic concept of God's immanence, it is said that God is closer to human beings than their own jugular vein. It is also often said that "there are two steps to the door of the Friend, you are stepping with the first step". That is, if something thinks of God, then he has already made half the walk to be in his Presence.

    In Hindu thought, the Advaita insists upon the Oneness of God's being and his Creation. There is no room in the Creation for God's absence.

    Of course, this is all a lot of human concepts.

    We don’t really need them to become a better person and we might get lost playing with great words instead of doing the good works.

    All Belief Systems are always subjective.

    There is no objective Belief, only Knowledge could perhaps be objective.

    Therefore I stop posting about all of this.

    🙂

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @Coconuts

  602. Bashibuzuk says:
    @Coconuts
    @silviosilver


    “Possible” here is a thorny term – who knows whether such a God would have been “possible” – but it still creates difficulties for people who believe God is perfect. Can he really be perfect if people can imagine a more perfect God?
     
    Thinking about this is probably how the idea of a maximally perfect being arose, or the idea that God is infinitely perfect in every aspect of being.

    Well he is God and I am but a lowly man, so perhaps it’s wrong for me to think I could ever understand his reasons. And maybe despite the fact that so much suffering seems unnecessary, God is still “good.” But can we really say he is “perfect”? God might be good, but if I can imagine a better God – eg a God that did everything else the same, but he created 1% less suffering – doesn’t that mean he is not the best possible God?
     
    Often people defending the idea of God as a maximally perfect being, or perfect being itself etc. don't use design arguments to do so. This is because it is not really possible to do it by trying to read attributes like perfection off opinions about how good a designer God is or whether he lives up to a particular conception of what a responsible moral agent would do (probably doing that is in itself illogical unless you are already a Kantian).

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

    God in my opinion must be seen as an Absolute transcending all limitations and categorizations.

    Even the sentence that I have just written is a somewhat absurd limitation that makes discussing God pointless.

    Even using the word God is limiting in a certain way.

    In early Christian thought this has been discussed by Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite.

    [MORE]

    There can be no unambiguous epistemology of Godhood.

    That is why Zen / Ch’an practitioners are right about “words having no meaning” when we are trying to approach Reality in and of itself.

    In Sufi though an emphasis is made on the Islamic concept of God’s immanence, it is said that God is closer to human beings than their own jugular vein. It is also often said that “there are two steps to the door of the Friend, you are stepping with the first step”. That is, if something thinks of God, then he has already made half the walk to be in his Presence.

    In Hindu thought, the Advaita insists upon the Oneness of God’s being and his Creation. There is no room in the Creation for God’s absence.

    Of course, this is all a lot of human concepts.

    We don’t really need them to become a better person and we might get lost playing with great words instead of doing the good works.

    All Belief Systems are always subjective.

    There is no objective Belief, only Knowledge could perhaps be objective.

    Therefore I stop posting about all of this.

    🙂

    • Agree: Barbarossa
    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @Bashibuzuk


    it is said that God is closer to human beings than their own jugular vein.
     


    “Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, and before you were born I consecrated you"
     
    Jeremiah 1:5
    , @Coconuts
    @Bashibuzuk


    Even using the word God is limiting in a certain way.

    In early Christian thought this has been discussed by Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite.
     

    It is interesting that he has always been very influential in the East, then when he was rediscovered in the West he became very influential as well. Afaik the idea of Kataphatic and Apophatic theology came from this tradition. St. Thomas dealt with talking positively about God in his famous analogy of being idea, where certain things can be said about God in human language by analogy but nothing can be said about him univocally.

    I understood it as drawing attention to the importance of religious practice if a person is seeking to understand God, as propositional knowledge of the normal kind is limited in how far it can go.


    In Sufi though an emphasis is made on the Islamic concept of God’s immanence, it is said that God is closer to human beings than their own jugular vein.
     
    I can understand this, many of the traditional arguments for God end up pointing to similar things about his relationship to creation.
  603. @Bashibuzuk
    @songbird

    Thanks for this video.

    https://archaeology-world.com/sunken-atlantis-pyramid-discovered-off-azores-coast-in-portugal/

    The location of Azores fits well with Plato's Atlantis description.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard

    It doesn’t fit with plate tectonics though. The mid Atlantic ridge is supposed to be rising not sinking. You aren’t supposed to entertain this idea in public but plate tectonics is only a theory.

    https://www.elsevier.com/books/the-expanding-earth/carey/978-0-444-41485-4

  604. Back on topic, Lula wins Brazil in “an astonishing comeback” – perhaps another “Biden landslide”.

    Lula immediately said he would be cosying up to the US (who after all may have put him there).

    Is this a loosening of the BRICs and a weakening of a multipolar world?

    • Replies: @LondonBob
    @YetAnotherAnon

    Seen the claims of a rigged election in Brazil, I expect there are issues, it is Brazil after all, but nothing as blatant as in the US in 2020, yet.

    Hard to know with Lula, easy to imagine that the DC elites are so incompetent and wrapped up in their own culture wars that the Democrat elite are celebrating the loss of the mildly pro-US Bolsonaro for the much more China friendly Lula because orange man bad. Overheard the BBC saying it was odd that Putin would congratulate Lula, of course it isn't at all, even though he was also on good terms with Bolsonaro.

  605. @Bashibuzuk
    @silviosilver


    He could have easily created a universe with no evil and no sin. He could have created a universe with no pain, too – which I can’t help thinking would have been kinda nice.
     
    He has created a Universe (actually a Multiverse comprising possibly an infinite number of Universes) that allows his creatures an infinite potential of freedom and evolution.

    If he would have created the Universe that you describe, it would have been a "closed system" static in its perfection and therefore inferior to the "open system" that we are witnessing every single moment of our existence.

    He has shown us the way that would be best for us to follow to evolve towards Him and as rapidly as possible shed as much imperfection (that you call sin) as possible. We are free to follow this path now or to follow it later. He is anyway the Attractor that will hopefully bring all of us into him again.

    Freedom is worth the suffering, and possibility to evolve is worth the pain. At least from my subjective experience. And God knows best...

    Replies: @silviosilver

    He has created a Universe (actually a Multiverse comprising possibly an infinite number of Universes) that allows his creatures an infinite potential of freedom and evolution.

    I’m not so sure. It seems to me there are plenty of things I do not have the “potential” to do – fly like a bird, swim like a fish, regenerate limbs. So my potential may be great, but it is surely something less than “infinite.” (Or maybe you were being poetic?)

    Or to get at the same point a little differently, how do know that our abilities, as we understand them, allow for infinite freedom – or the maximal freedom possible in this universe? Can we ever really be sure of that? Or are we just jumping to that conclusion because we want to praise God and this sounds like the sort of thing that would please him?

    Because if it’s not actually true that we enjoy the maximal amount of freedom possible, then it opens up the possibility that the degree of suffering could in fact have been set at a lower point than the level we know, and we wouldn’t necessarily lose any freedom as a result. In other words, we could be just as we are, have the same potential we have, but the level of suffering in the universe could be, say, 50% lower.

    He has shown us the way that would be best for us to follow to evolve towards Him and as rapidly as possible shed as much imperfection (that you call sin) as possible.

    I didn’t invent the concept of sin. That’s been passed down to us by Christian thinkers. God hates sin, they say. Hates it so much that, if you sin, he wants you out of his sight. Worse, seemingly vindictively, he’ll torture you for an eternity if you commit sin. That’s how much he hates it. But then why create it If you hate peanut butter, would you make yourself a peanut butter sandwich, and then complain to everyone at work how much you hate your lunch? Is that smart?

    And if you know everything, and you create a creature that you know is going to sin and displease you – because that’s the way you made it – shouldn’t you blame yourself rather than your creation for acting the way it does? Sorry if that sounds snarky, but these are questions I’ve never managed to answer to my satisfaction (and my bar is set pretty low; anything halfway plausible would put me at ease, or at least that’s what I think).

    It seems to me that most (even all) these difficulties could be avoided by relaxing our assumptions about God’s omnipotence, omniscience or omnibenevolent. Say there’s something that seems logically possible, but God can’t do it. Would that really be the end of the world? Or what if God doesn’t actually know the future. Maybe he can predict it scarily accurately, but – crucially – less than 100% accurately. Or maybe he could know it if he wanted to, but he chooses not to (for reasons of his own – but maybe something like if you’re watching the replay of a sportsball match, it’s less exciting if you already know the outcome). Or maybe he’s not quite as caring or loving as we’ve been led to think. This is the hardest one to swallow, but the easiest to reconcile with our experience of existence.

    • Agree: Mikel
    • Replies: @sudden death
    @silviosilver


    Or maybe he’s not quite as caring or loving as we’ve been led to think. This is the hardest one to swallow, but the easiest to reconcile with our experience of existence.
     
    Very many people overall want to be cared or loved and it is incredibly hard to be living in a universe which does not care about them, so once again we have a very practical and useful cope of having some higher forces out there that do love or care. It is very natural feeling, which ofc has been and will be used, abused, exploited and amplified during the existence of humanity, but it is probably needed for many people to not go completely crazy and be capable of functioning, loving and caring human beings themselves while being self-aware and intelligent but mortal, relatively easily harmed and overall quite individually short-lived in grand scheme of things.

    Imho for some people the idea of cruel god(s) might be easier to swallow, than idea of no god(s)/higher forces and just absolute indifference towards them (no matter if in moments of happiness or suffering) in nature.

    Replies: @silviosilver

    , @Dmitry
    @silviosilver

    In the Bible, God has a very unambiguous answer for these questions.

    Although the answer, is including "don't ask these questions, human".

    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Job+38-42%3A6&version=AMP

    It's maybe psychologically healthy for the humans. "Don't ask questions".

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @silviosilver

    , @Coconuts
    @silviosilver


    Sorry if that sounds snarky, but these are questions I’ve never managed to answer to my satisfaction (and my bar is set pretty low; anything halfway plausible would put me at ease, or at least that’s what I think).
     
    Idk, in the New Atheist message board era you would often see people writing stuff like that. You never know it is just being said to draw people into discussion and to maximise rhetorical effect later when the sceptic rejects all the arguments they are presented with; 'look how open minded and genuine I am, and these arguments still are unable to convince me... ' etc. This stuff may be just a flex, expression of will-to-power or something like that.

    Like here:


    I didn’t invent the concept of sin. That’s been passed down to us by Christian thinkers. God hates sin, they say. Hates it so much that, if you sin, he wants you out of his sight.
     
    Christianity has it that God decided to become a man and live with humans and be killed by them to rescue them from their sin, so in Christianity God's views on it must not as clear as this.

    In the past study of theology didn't happen until a student had studied philosophy first; most of the Catholic and Orthodox theologians writing on this topic are Platonists of one sort or another, most Anglo internet agnostics seem to be default empiricists and utilitarians or pragmatists. Imo Empiricists and Platonists will often talk past each other if they are not aware of some of the assumptions they are bringing to the discussion.


    And if you know everything, and you create a creature that you know is going to sin and displease you – because that’s the way you made it – shouldn’t you blame yourself rather than your creation for acting the way it does?
     
    Say sin is a type of privation or absence of something, and being a creation also inherently involves privation or absence of something (it involves lacking non-contingent existence and being less than infinitely perfect), the existence of creation is inherently linked to the existence of something like sin. Sin would be a sub type of privation or imperfection specific to humans and other created entities with a certain level of freedom and control over their own behaviour.

    The question about sin becomes a variant of 'why does anything created or contingent exist?'

  606. @Bashibuzuk
    @Mr. Hack

    Orthodox Christianity is a beautiful religious tradition. It has many spiritual gifts to offer those who partake in it. I have the highest esteem of Orthodoxy, especially its Old Believer denominations, which have avoided the Nikonian reforms and stood steadfast in their protection of the Russian religious heritage, despute all the persecution that has been directed against them by Romanovs' dynasty Westernizers and their Bolshevik successors.

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/71/Mikhail_Nesterov_001_crop1.jpg

    https://uploads4.wikiart.org/images/mikhail-nesterov/venerable-sergius-of-radonezh-1899.jpg

    https://img-fotki.yandex.ru/get/5411/161887320.6d/0_188481_2d675c0c_orig.jpg

    https://pravlife.org/sites/default/files/styles/article_575/public/field/image/sergii_radonezhsky_po_rusi_efoshkin_.jpg

    https://cdn.gallerix.asia/sr/_RUS/754133413/1369833557.jpg

    Unfortunately, I have no Old Believer ancestors. Conversion to Old Believer tradition is a very complex process and there are no Old Believer parishes where I live.

    Moreover, I am quite heterodox, bordering on heretical, by any Christian standards. Therefore, I will keep admiring Orthodox Faith from a respectful distance.

    However, God willing, each time I would go to Moscow (where I haven't been since 2018), I would as usual donate to the Church that I have been baptized into, a beautiful early seventeenth century temple that still needs a lot of renovation work after years of Sovok neglect and disrepair.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    The last that I remember, you seemed to be following some sort of Buddhist path. But now you seem to be talking about God, and in very affirmative ways?…this is why I thought that you were finding your way back to the church in which you were baptised? It’s clear that you weren’t baptised into an Old Believer’s church, so it was probably a mainline ROC church? And even if you have some sort of qualms with the ROC, can’t you find something close bye that would be amenable to your conscience, Greek, Serbian or even Ukrainian (your Grandfather, after all was fiery Ukrainian)? John Chrysostom
    reminds us that God’s warm embrace is open to converts until midnight. You wouldn’t be considered a convert, already having been baptised, but now a fallen away soul. And so many of us have at one time or another fallen away. Time to return to the flock, repent and take part in Holy Communion?…

  607. @Bashibuzuk
    @Coconuts

    God in my opinion must be seen as an Absolute transcending all limitations and categorizations.

    Even the sentence that I have just written is a somewhat absurd limitation that makes discussing God pointless.

    Even using the word God is limiting in a certain way.

    In early Christian thought this has been discussed by Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite.

    There can be no unambiguous epistemology of Godhood.

    That is why Zen / Ch'an practitioners are right about "words having no meaning" when we are trying to approach Reality in and of itself.

    In Sufi though an emphasis is made on the Islamic concept of God's immanence, it is said that God is closer to human beings than their own jugular vein. It is also often said that "there are two steps to the door of the Friend, you are stepping with the first step". That is, if something thinks of God, then he has already made half the walk to be in his Presence.

    In Hindu thought, the Advaita insists upon the Oneness of God's being and his Creation. There is no room in the Creation for God's absence.

    Of course, this is all a lot of human concepts.

    We don’t really need them to become a better person and we might get lost playing with great words instead of doing the good works.

    All Belief Systems are always subjective.

    There is no objective Belief, only Knowledge could perhaps be objective.

    Therefore I stop posting about all of this.

    🙂

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @Coconuts

    it is said that God is closer to human beings than their own jugular vein.

    “Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, and before you were born I consecrated you”

    Jeremiah 1:5

  608. @silviosilver
    @Bashibuzuk


    He has created a Universe (actually a Multiverse comprising possibly an infinite number of Universes) that allows his creatures an infinite potential of freedom and evolution.
     
    I'm not so sure. It seems to me there are plenty of things I do not have the "potential" to do - fly like a bird, swim like a fish, regenerate limbs. So my potential may be great, but it is surely something less than "infinite." (Or maybe you were being poetic?)

    Or to get at the same point a little differently, how do know that our abilities, as we understand them, allow for infinite freedom - or the maximal freedom possible in this universe? Can we ever really be sure of that? Or are we just jumping to that conclusion because we want to praise God and this sounds like the sort of thing that would please him?

    Because if it's not actually true that we enjoy the maximal amount of freedom possible, then it opens up the possibility that the degree of suffering could in fact have been set at a lower point than the level we know, and we wouldn't necessarily lose any freedom as a result. In other words, we could be just as we are, have the same potential we have, but the level of suffering in the universe could be, say, 50% lower.


    He has shown us the way that would be best for us to follow to evolve towards Him and as rapidly as possible shed as much imperfection (that you call sin) as possible.
     
    I didn't invent the concept of sin. That's been passed down to us by Christian thinkers. God hates sin, they say. Hates it so much that, if you sin, he wants you out of his sight. Worse, seemingly vindictively, he'll torture you for an eternity if you commit sin. That's how much he hates it. But then why create it If you hate peanut butter, would you make yourself a peanut butter sandwich, and then complain to everyone at work how much you hate your lunch? Is that smart?

    And if you know everything, and you create a creature that you know is going to sin and displease you - because that's the way you made it - shouldn't you blame yourself rather than your creation for acting the way it does? Sorry if that sounds snarky, but these are questions I've never managed to answer to my satisfaction (and my bar is set pretty low; anything halfway plausible would put me at ease, or at least that's what I think).

    It seems to me that most (even all) these difficulties could be avoided by relaxing our assumptions about God's omnipotence, omniscience or omnibenevolent. Say there's something that seems logically possible, but God can't do it. Would that really be the end of the world? Or what if God doesn't actually know the future. Maybe he can predict it scarily accurately, but - crucially - less than 100% accurately. Or maybe he could know it if he wanted to, but he chooses not to (for reasons of his own - but maybe something like if you're watching the replay of a sportsball match, it's less exciting if you already know the outcome). Or maybe he's not quite as caring or loving as we've been led to think. This is the hardest one to swallow, but the easiest to reconcile with our experience of existence.

    Replies: @sudden death, @Dmitry, @Coconuts

    Or maybe he’s not quite as caring or loving as we’ve been led to think. This is the hardest one to swallow, but the easiest to reconcile with our experience of existence.

    Very many people overall want to be cared or loved and it is incredibly hard to be living in a universe which does not care about them, so once again we have a very practical and useful cope of having some higher forces out there that do love or care. It is very natural feeling, which ofc has been and will be used, abused, exploited and amplified during the existence of humanity, but it is probably needed for many people to not go completely crazy and be capable of functioning, loving and caring human beings themselves while being self-aware and intelligent but mortal, relatively easily harmed and overall quite individually short-lived in grand scheme of things.

    Imho for some people the idea of cruel god(s) might be easier to swallow, than idea of no god(s)/higher forces and just absolute indifference towards them (no matter if in moments of happiness or suffering) in nature.

    • Agree: Bashibuzuk, Mikel
    • Replies: @silviosilver
    @sudden death


    Very many people overall want to be cared or loved and it is incredibly hard to be living in a universe which does not care about them, so once again we have a very practical and useful cope of having some higher forces out there that do love or care.
     
    Well sure. I'm not opposed to the idea myself. I am only challenging the version that has been presented to is, in which God is the most loving being imaginable. That belief gets people into all sorts of trouble, because inevitably something will happen which doesn't seem all that "loving" or even "necessary" - the old why do bad things happen to good people conundrum.

    Now, if we simply allow that God is loving, but not always, and not always to the same degree, then we're much less likely to feel let down by God. When various bad things happen to us, we're more likely to look to ourselves for the cause, to draw upon our own resources to put things right, rather than shaking our fist at God. Resilient people have always done this, but even resilient people can feel crushed by life and lose their faith if something so bad happens that they start feeling that God isn't "playing fair" and why believe in him anyway, it's all just bullshit. But with relaxed assumptions about God's maximal goodness, it's easier to keep the faith, and perhaps easier to find it again if we do lose it.

    Imho for some people the idea of cruel god(s) might be easier to swallow, than idea of no god(s)/higher forces and just absolute indifference towards them (no matter if in moments of happiness or suffering) in nature.
     
    An indifferent God isn't a bad deal. Maybe he doesn't take any interest in our suffering but at least he exists, which leaves open the possibility that there's "something" beyond our material existence - an afterlife, maybe, or a final spiritual experience that makes our expiration easy to take and which we don't fear, maybe even gladly move towards (ie the opposite of our feelings about death, which perplexes and frightens us and which we do all we can to avoid).
  609. In honor of Halloween I thought I would post a true tale of wartime horror in regards to a certain British Colonel by the name of Richard Geoffrey Pine-Coffin.

    To provide some background, the good colonel was born in 1908, one of six siblings, and, as his name indicates, was of the wealthy Pine-Coffin family of Devonshire, England, the Pine-Coffin’s having a lengthy history of distinguished service in the British army.

    Richard’s father, John Edward Pine-Coffin for instance, had served in the Second Boer War, and his uncle, Lieutenant Tristram James Pine-Coffin, would serve in WWI, and die in northwestern Russia in 1919 during the Intervention.

    During WWII, Richard would serve as a Parachute Battalion commanding officer from late 1942 through mid-1945, in North Africa, Normandy, and Germany. The men under him, being the superstitious lot soldiers often are, and perhaps mercifully not wishing to jinx him anymore than he may already have been jinxed due to his given name, would refuse to call him Pine-Coffin, and simply referred to him as ‘Wooden Box’.

    Early in the war in Feb 1942, Richard’s older brother Claude Pine-Coffin, would be captured upon the fall of Singapore and survive the war as a POW. Another relative, Sgt Geoffrey Tristam Pine-Coffin, was killed on 13/14 July 1943 serving as a flight engineer with 102 Squadron while on an operational bombing raid to Aachen.

    Possibly before the war, but maybe during it, one of Richard’s sisters, Gwen, who in happier times he would collect sports cars with as a hobby, would develop tuberculosis of the bone, and have her leg amputated at the hip to save her life.

    Richard’s wife, Joan, whom he had a son named Peter with in 1939, would die of meningitis in 1944.

    Well, it was only a matter of time before his own number came up. During Richard Pine-Coffins last jump over the Rhine in late March, 1945, with only a little over thirty days left in the war, he himself while leading his men would (you guessed it) sadly receive a serious head wound, and….happily, if perhaps somewhat unexpectedly, survive. 🙂

    Richard Pine-Coffin retired from the British army on 20 December, 1958 and was granted the honorary rank of colonel with reserve liability (which expired in 1963). He died on 28 February 1974, in the Royal Naval Hospital Haslar, survived by his son Peter.

    Purportedly, whenever General Patton had gone into battle in WWI, he had a fear that he would be struck by a bullet right between the eyes. Can you imagine what someone with a surname like ‘Pine-Coffin’ would have going through their mind whenever they went into battle?

    No one would have blamed Richard Pine-Coffin for changing his family’s given surname.

    That he didn’t is surely a sign of keeping a proverbial ‘stiff upper lip’.

    Col Richard Pine-Coffin

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Pine-Coffin

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @S

    Seems like a lucky charm name.

  610. @Beckow
    @Mikel


    ...Russia had the incomparably better choice of continuing to develop economically, trying to improve relations with everybody and maintain or enlarge the formidable security umbrella that it already had, with the largest nuclear arsenal in the world.
     
    That's not an answer to my question, that is a generic high-level evasive non-answer. My question was what was Russia supposed to do about Nato moving into Ukraine and Kiev government (and obviously a large part of Ukie society) suppressing the rights of Russians in Ukraine, closing schools, banning Russian in offices, bombing them.

    That is the question and not some economic development or having nukes. Your answer amounts to telling Russia to do nothing. They couldn't do nothing - the specific situation in Ukraine that lasted for 8 years was not something any large country - and many smaller ones - could ignore.

    Both the issue of Nato moving into Ukraine and the suppression of Russians were well documented and discussed for years. It was an attempt by the West to dare Russia to do something. They either thought Russia was bluffing or they actually welcome the war. So we have a war, but to pretend that Russia had another rational choice is foolish. Doing nothing as you suggest was not an option. It wouldn't be for US, China, France, UK, in the similar circumstances.

    Try again, this time with an actual answer.

    Replies: @silviosilver, @Mikel, @Philip Owen

    That’s not an answer to my question

    That’s a perfectly valid answer to your question. Just not the one you have decided in advance to be the only correct one so you won’t bother considering its merits, which makes a discussion with you on this topic pointless.

    Silviosilver beat me to it but 10 months ago you were not here predicting that Russia would invade because it just had no other choice. Like basically everyone at the time, you surely didn’t think Putin would take such an extreme measure as a full invasion of Ukraine. You really come across as someone who will always defend anything Russia does, be it one thing or the opposite.

    The comparison with what other “big countries” would do in Russia’s position (just the US really, the rest are second fiddles) doesn’t fly with me at all. I’m actually trying to hold Russia to the same standards as I hold the US, where I supported a MAGA movement that was also supposed to concentrate on economic development and abandon foreign military interventions and commitments (before his leader forgot what platform he had won the election with). This movement continues to have plenty of popular support in the US btw and we may one day see it applying those policies in earnest but perhaps it is you who thinks that Russians are too primitive to follow such a civilized course of action.

    I happen to be in favor of the right to secession in almost all circumstances so in my view Russian and other ethnic minorities that ended on the wrong side of the post-USSR borders should be allowed to join whichever state of their liking in properly held referendums. But there are countless countries in the world with ethnic diasporas scattered in neighboring countries (among them some big ones like China or Germany) and they don’t go invading their neighbors anymore. Russia has the choice of being just like any of these countries, no more no less.

    The idea that Ukraine possibly joining NATO and oppressing the Russian language left Russia with no choice but to start a war where NATO has enlarged to two additional neighbors, de facto now operates in Ukraine like never before and many more innocent Russophone civilians are being killed by Russia itself than Ukraine ever did is just ridiculous. Western countries’ euphemism of “collateral damage” never referred to the killing of their own civilians, btw, which they never did. This war has been a total disaster, even from the perspective of what Russia was supposed to achieve. We are all much worse off because of it, including yourself, but for some strange reason you feel the need to support it.

    • Agree: Bashibuzuk
    • Replies: @A123
    @Mikel


    supported a MAGA movement ... abandon foreign military interventions and commitments (before his leader forgot what platform he had won the election with)
     
    Trump kept the MAGA "Anti-War" platform he won on. Everyone understands this objective TRUTH.

    Notable achievements included:

    1. Trump is the first President in modern history to start ZERO new wars. This is a massive achievement that should be celebrated by all Americans.

    It is especially momentous, as Trump had to contend with sociopath Khamenei who was openly trying to provoke a war.

     
    https://joannenova.com.au/wp-content/presidents-wars.jpg
     

    2. Trump pulled U.S. troops out of the kill sack between Turkish and Syrian/Russian lines. "Protecting Oil" was a fig leaf believed by no one. Functionally, the U.S. efforts now provide intelligence on Iranian terrorists operating in Syria and Western Iraq, and little else.

    Trump also made it clear that the U.S. would not support Erdogan's aggression. The NATO defensive alliance would not back a Turkish offensive operation.

    3. Trump effectively ended the Afghan War.

     
    https://i.dawn.com/primary/2020/10/5f7f8869c725d.jpg
     

    Gen. SJW Milley's treachery was avoided. We will never know whether if that was Trump personally not trusting the traitor. Or, if senior staff headed off the trap. Probably both.

    If Trump received the 2nd term that he won at the ballot box, there would have been a deal & orderly pull out centered on Bagram.
    ___

    MAGA (under Donald Trump) ratcheted down SJW Globalist Forever Wars across the globe.

    What more could anyone want that is "actually achievable"?

    Did Trump achieve 100% of absolutely, totally, everything, across the entire globe? Of course not, that simply was not available. No President can possibly deliver 100% of absolutely, totally, everything. The American system does NOT work that way.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @Sean

    , @Beckow
    @Mikel

    To summarize what you say was a better option for Russia: Do nothing.

    Oh, and open more MacDonalds and quietly hope that Ukraine won't be in Nato in 2023, but only in 2025, or even 2030.


    Ukraine possibly joining NATO and oppressing the Russian language
     
    You are not addressing reality: Nato WAS in Ukraine, it was expanding, it was building bases - 'joint and temporary', but in reality Nato bases - the fig leave of postponing formal membership wouldn't fool a monkey, why do you hide behind 'possibly'?

    MAGA rule continued with all these policies, incl. Ukraine in Nato. Electing Zelensky by 70% to have peace and equal rights for Russians reversed with speed not seen since De Gaulle pulled out of Algeria. You ignore all of that to talk about some ideals, peace, non-intervention, etc...well, there was a de facto state of war on Russian-Ukie border since 2014. It was escalating, Kiev and the West were raising the stakes.

    I never support any wars because wars are the worst context for conscience and rationality. But to unilaterally blame only Russia for this war is a lie: they were very seriously and forcefully challenged on their own borders and within their own Russian-speaking community. It is incomprehensible that you would claim that other nations would put up with it. And the best analogy is US - Russia and US are roughly comparable. If one can, so can the other.

    In wars force prevails. So far it has been a rolling disaster, but Russia accomplished its primary goals:
    - Nato is out of Ukraine and visibly scared to go too far in helping Kiev
    - the issue of treatment of the very large Russian minority is on the table - it can no longer be ignored as Europe ignored for the last 8 years, any settlement will address that.

    But it is ugly and I really wish it had not come to this. I don't really like to predict - let's leave that to the heavens - so any opinions are snapshots of what one sees at that given time. In retrospect we obviously see more. Blood will decide this - and it was as much the fault of Kiev, Nato, Brussels, London, and also MAGA that did exactly nothing to solve this situation peacefully. So have your MAGA, I wish them well, but in 2017-20 in Ukraine they failed.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @A123, @Mikel

    , @Wokechoke
    @Mikel

    I expected a war between the US/UK and Russia over Crimea as far back as 2014. I expected a war after chatting with some American US embassy workers from Moscow Embassy. I think the UK tried to trigger a was with HMS Defender. Who’s to say that caper wasn’t the final straw?

    , @Philip Owen
    @Mikel

    NATO was an irrelevance and only discussed because of Stavka paranoia. The UK and the US are the relevant parties without any refence to NATO. They had obligations under the Budapest Memorandum to assist Ukraine maintain its sovereignty against Russian invasion. The Russian proxy invasions of 2014 were unexpected so there had been no preparation.

    After 2014, the UK and US trained and equipped Ukraine to fight a Partizan war. So only infantry weapons were supplied. NLAWS, Javelins, sniper rifles. They did not expect Ukraine to prevail against a full scale Russian invasion. The Russian defeat at the battle of Kiev was a surpise both as an event and in terms of the scale of the Russian rout. There is now an effort to ramp up Ukrainian capability with heavier weapons and more adanced training. Urban warfare at night in my direct observation - winter is coming. There is still no NATO intervention in Ukraine or short term prospect of Ukraine joining NATO. The Eastern Europeans of course now support Ukraine out of shared memories of colonization by Russia. The Germans and the French because they know the side with which they need to maintain good relations. Also, better for Ukraine to defeat Russia (greater humiliation for the regime). Even so, if Russia downs a Turkish ship NATO will be involved.

    This war is completely down to the FSB' and Stavka's imperialist urge to genocide Ukrainian identity. The intention has been there since at least the time of Nicholas 1 who tried with Poland first.

    Replies: @Mikel, @LondonBob

  611. @Mikel
    @Beckow


    That’s not an answer to my question
     
    That's a perfectly valid answer to your question. Just not the one you have decided in advance to be the only correct one so you won't bother considering its merits, which makes a discussion with you on this topic pointless.

    Silviosilver beat me to it but 10 months ago you were not here predicting that Russia would invade because it just had no other choice. Like basically everyone at the time, you surely didn't think Putin would take such an extreme measure as a full invasion of Ukraine. You really come across as someone who will always defend anything Russia does, be it one thing or the opposite.

    The comparison with what other "big countries" would do in Russia's position (just the US really, the rest are second fiddles) doesn't fly with me at all. I'm actually trying to hold Russia to the same standards as I hold the US, where I supported a MAGA movement that was also supposed to concentrate on economic development and abandon foreign military interventions and commitments (before his leader forgot what platform he had won the election with). This movement continues to have plenty of popular support in the US btw and we may one day see it applying those policies in earnest but perhaps it is you who thinks that Russians are too primitive to follow such a civilized course of action.

    I happen to be in favor of the right to secession in almost all circumstances so in my view Russian and other ethnic minorities that ended on the wrong side of the post-USSR borders should be allowed to join whichever state of their liking in properly held referendums. But there are countless countries in the world with ethnic diasporas scattered in neighboring countries (among them some big ones like China or Germany) and they don't go invading their neighbors anymore. Russia has the choice of being just like any of these countries, no more no less.

    The idea that Ukraine possibly joining NATO and oppressing the Russian language left Russia with no choice but to start a war where NATO has enlarged to two additional neighbors, de facto now operates in Ukraine like never before and many more innocent Russophone civilians are being killed by Russia itself than Ukraine ever did is just ridiculous. Western countries' euphemism of "collateral damage" never referred to the killing of their own civilians, btw, which they never did. This war has been a total disaster, even from the perspective of what Russia was supposed to achieve. We are all much worse off because of it, including yourself, but for some strange reason you feel the need to support it.

    Replies: @A123, @Beckow, @Wokechoke, @Philip Owen

    supported a MAGA movement … abandon foreign military interventions and commitments (before his leader forgot what platform he had won the election with)

    Trump kept the MAGA “Anti-War” platform he won on. Everyone understands this objective TRUTH.

    Notable achievements included:

    1. Trump is the first President in modern history to start ZERO new wars. This is a massive achievement that should be celebrated by all Americans.

    It is especially momentous, as Trump had to contend with sociopath Khamenei who was openly trying to provoke a war.

      

    2. Trump pulled U.S. troops out of the kill sack between Turkish and Syrian/Russian lines. “Protecting Oil” was a fig leaf believed by no one. Functionally, the U.S. efforts now provide intelligence on Iranian terrorists operating in Syria and Western Iraq, and little else.

    Trump also made it clear that the U.S. would not support Erdogan’s aggression. The NATO defensive alliance would not back a Turkish offensive operation.

    3. Trump effectively ended the Afghan War.

      

    Gen. SJW Milley’s treachery was avoided. We will never know whether if that was Trump personally not trusting the traitor. Or, if senior staff headed off the trap. Probably both.

    If Trump received the 2nd term that he won at the ballot box, there would have been a deal & orderly pull out centered on Bagram.
    ___

    MAGA (under Donald Trump) ratcheted down SJW Globalist Forever Wars across the globe.

    What more could anyone want that is “actually achievable”?

    Did Trump achieve 100% of absolutely, totally, everything, across the entire globe? Of course not, that simply was not available. No President can possibly deliver 100% of absolutely, totally, everything. The American system does NOT work that way.

    PEACE 😇

    • Replies: @Sean
    @A123

    Gen. SJW Milley is the man who pushed adaptation of the HIMARS, fourteen of which were enough to check the Russian logistics necessary for their advances. Ukraine fought Russia somewhat asymmetrically and Russia responded by and ongoing methodical targeting Ukraine's energy system

    Milley's undertaking to warn China of a US first strike was quite reasonable in view of the fact that China has very few ICBM's compared to what it could have because China has been pursuing a commercial path to unchallengeable strength, and frightening China could change that. And the assurance concerned ICBMs being used out the blue.

    Milley has had a a few calls with his Russian counterpart GenValery Gerasimov (who the US spared from its now suspended assassination campaign against RusFed commanders). . However thanks to Milley pet project becoming an American gift to Ukraine allied to omniscient US surveillance and intel, HIMARS has done too good a job and the Russian are now abandoning nass in attack for using drones and cruise missiles against essential utilities in Ukraine's cities and towns. Russia is actually doing quite well with its new strategy and the better they do the less chance they'll start toying with the idea of a tactical nuke.

    As John Keegan said, battles are aimed at the disintegration of human groups. I believe the Russians are moving from attacks on the cohesion of military formations to the morale of the population in 'decision making centres' (ie cities). That strategy won't kill a lot of people, but it will disconcert the Ukrainian leadership.

    Replies: @A123, @LondonBob

  612. @Mikhail
    @Sean


    Hodges said before the invasion that the Russians would be unable to take Kiev, and he was right. Just like Mearshiemer was about Russia being fated to attack Ukraine unless it had a nuclear deterent .
     
    Before the 2/24/22 SMO, I didn't believe the Russians would try to take Kiev in the event of their pursuing military action in the former Ukrainian SSR. Based on what has transpired, that wasn't part of the SMO.

    Along with Hodges' comment about the Kiev regime retaking Crimea within the last 12 months, he absurdly claimed that Ukrainians and not Russians beat back the Nazis.

    Concerning Mearsheimer:

    https://strategic-culture.org/news/2019/08/21/getting-real-with-the-us-foreign-policy-establishment-realists/

    Excerpt -

    On the subject of Russia and Ukraine, I’m reminded of a September 5, 2014 PBS NewsHour segment, where noted foreign policy realist John Mearsheimer said: “The Russians have made it very clear that they’re not going to tolerate a situation where Ukraine forms an alliance with NATO, the principle reason that Russia is now in Ukraine and trying to wreck Ukraine.

    And let’s be clear here. Why Russia is trying to wreck Ukraine, is because Russia doesn’t want Ukraine to become part of the West. It doesn’t want it to be integrated into NATO or the EU. And if we follow the prescriptions that Bill and I know Mike favors as well, what we are going to end up doing is further antagonizing Putin. He is going to play more hardball. And the end result is that Ukraine is going to be wrecked as a country, and we’re going to have terrible relations between Russia and the West, which is not in Russia’s interest and not in our interest
    .”

    At a University of Chicago event, Mearsheimer also singles out Russia as seeking to “wreck” Ukraine. He doesn’t use that word to characterize Western actions. Hence, his usage comes across as disproportionate and puzzling. (Offhand, I don’t recall Mearsheimer using a word like “wreck” to describe US actions in Yugoslavia, Iraq and Libya.) When compared to Russia, Mearsheimer has said that he finds more fault with the Western stances taken on Ukraine.


     
    On this matter of yours -

    They had the psychological momentum. The Ukrainian officers were not leading effectively in 2015; that has changed. In his TedX talk of six years ago, Hodges says Lt. Eric Wood (who fought to the death during the Battle of the Bulge on his own initiative ) and Joshua Chamberlain epitomised what is expected of an officer, and that kind of ethos was inculcated into the Ukrainan armed forces. The standing orders were to fight and not retreat unless authorised to do so. There is a lot more surveillance of commanders and other officials by the very numerous Ukrainian security police too. Putin wanted to reprise his Crimea production as if Ukraine had not taken remedial measures to ensure there could be not repitition. As John Gray says Putin is not a military man
     
    We seem to be in disagreement. My points about USSR-Finland in 19399 and Russia being militarily better equipped in 1917 than 1914 weren't addressed by you. These examples lead me to believe that the Kiev regime will not militarily prevail. At the very best, it could IMO possibly get an agreement losing all of the former Ukrainian SSR territory it currently doesn't control.

    Yes, the Kiev regime forces are better than in 2015. A good number of these forces are no more. Many more of them aren't so well armed and trained.

    Russia waiting til 2022 serves to show that Russia gave the peaceful option a chance.

    Replies: @Sean, @LondonBob

    We seem to be in disagreement. My points about USSR-Finland in 1939

    The most important point is that Finland’s military successes led to them being supported; Britain and France were preparing an Expeditionary Force to help Finland fight Russia, as Carol Quigley said Neville Chamberlain wanted a declared, but unfought war against Germany, combined with a undeclared although fought war against the USSR.

    These examples lead me to believe that the Kiev regime will not militarily prevail.

    Finland was able to come to terms with the Kremlin after three months because Russia wanted land close to Leningrad ceded to them, and after 80,000 frostbite injuries and deaths of the troops didn’t increase its demands. Putin’s objectives for the war have altered since the begining, going by his statements he increasingly seems to envision a remaking of the entire European security order. That cuts both ways, and so Russia is being informed it could lose its 2014 gains if it percists (see bolded below).

    Along with Hodges’ comment about the Kiev regime retaking Crimea within the next 12 months, he absurdly claimed that Ukrainians and not Russians beat back the Nazis.

    Hitler allowed himself to be diverted from Moscow by Ukraine during the crucial four months when his forces had momentum. Führerhauptquartier Werwolf was at Vinnytsia, a location that may have been influenced by the Nazis’ proposed trans-European highway to the Crimean Peninsula, which quite possibly will come to fruition now. Seriously though, I think Hodges is saying those things as a counter to statements like Macgregors (which Hodges is surely aware of) because he wants Russia to realise that there is no such thing as a limited liability war.

    Russia waiting til 2022 serves to show that Russia gave the peaceful option a chance

    There is no reason why he wouldn’t want to settle geopolitical problems without actual hostilities, above all an all-out conventional war; in practical terms the price of dawdling was war would be much more bloody than it would have been if levied in a timely way against Ukrainian army 1.0. rather than the 2.0 version they are now facing. The Kremlin did not seem to have had a correct understanding of the necessity for being firstest with the mostest apparently through assuming could Russia merely move to overawe them a second time. In in the middle of Ukraine proper. Where the Ukrainians were on what they consider their own ground and had logistical infrastruvture to hand. And Russian columns were sitting ducks. The US has not even given Ukraine half of the most effective types of missiles it could yet. All the Russian army can do is try a quick reset and plough on.

  613. @S
    In honor of Halloween I thought I would post a true tale of wartime horror in regards to a certain British Colonel by the name of Richard Geoffrey Pine-Coffin.

    To provide some background, the good colonel was born in 1908, one of six siblings, and, as his name indicates, was of the wealthy Pine-Coffin family of Devonshire, England, the Pine-Coffin's having a lengthy history of distinguished service in the British army.

    Richard's father, John Edward Pine-Coffin for instance, had served in the Second Boer War, and his uncle, Lieutenant Tristram James Pine-Coffin, would serve in WWI, and die in northwestern Russia in 1919 during the Intervention.

    During WWII, Richard would serve as a Parachute Battalion commanding officer from late 1942 through mid-1945, in North Africa, Normandy, and Germany. The men under him, being the superstitious lot soldiers often are, and perhaps mercifully not wishing to jinx him anymore than he may already have been jinxed due to his given name, would refuse to call him Pine-Coffin, and simply referred to him as 'Wooden Box'.

    Early in the war in Feb 1942, Richard's older brother Claude Pine-Coffin, would be captured upon the fall of Singapore and survive the war as a POW. Another relative, Sgt Geoffrey Tristam Pine-Coffin, was killed on 13/14 July 1943 serving as a flight engineer with 102 Squadron while on an operational bombing raid to Aachen.

    Possibly before the war, but maybe during it, one of Richard's sisters, Gwen, who in happier times he would collect sports cars with as a hobby, would develop tuberculosis of the bone, and have her leg amputated at the hip to save her life.

    Richard's wife, Joan, whom he had a son named Peter with in 1939, would die of meningitis in 1944.

    Well, it was only a matter of time before his own number came up. During Richard Pine-Coffins last jump over the Rhine in late March, 1945, with only a little over thirty days left in the war, he himself while leading his men would (you guessed it) sadly receive a serious head wound, and....happily, if perhaps somewhat unexpectedly, survive. :-)

    Richard Pine-Coffin retired from the British army on 20 December, 1958 and was granted the honorary rank of colonel with reserve liability (which expired in 1963). He died on 28 February 1974, in the Royal Naval Hospital Haslar, survived by his son Peter.

    Purportedly, whenever General Patton had gone into battle in WWI, he had a fear that he would be struck by a bullet right between the eyes. Can you imagine what someone with a surname like 'Pine-Coffin' would have going through their mind whenever they went into battle?

    No one would have blamed Richard Pine-Coffin for changing his family's given surname.

    That he didn't is surely a sign of keeping a proverbial 'stiff upper lip'.

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/6/68/RichardGeoffreyPinCoffin.jpg


    Col Richard Pine-Coffin

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Pine-Coffin

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    Seems like a lucky charm name.

    • LOL: S
  614. Did Nancy Pelosi have her children through artificial insemination? What does A123 think?

    I’ve long thought it was an interesting game to pick horrible politicians like her and try to think of a few rules that might have prevented their rise to power.

    Pelosi passes the test of having had children which Merkel and Harris and many other female pols fail, but not all (Truss, who could have been banned for infidelity). But were they naturally conceived? If not then that would would have been a successful way to remove her.

    • Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
    @songbird

    A bunch of these 1% er fems use surrogate mothers to carry and nurse their offspring as they don't have the will to perform the work themselves and they have the money to burn. I wonder how old the kids are when mommy comes clean about their origin.

    It sure was funny this morning when four separate stories showed up in newlinks at the same time. The best one I saw had a Hillary Clinton tweet about how only a deplorable could even think of doing this. To be fair we don't actually know what happened. The thing is even though it might not be the absolute worst it is a safe bet it's pretty bad.

    Replies: @songbird

    , @A123
    @songbird


    Did Nancy Pelosi have her children through artificial insemination? What does A123 think?
     
    It would be interesting to see a DNA test vs. JFK.

     
    https://i.redd.it/ug1onmcxhew31.jpg
     

    Also, Paul may have been straight when they were married. Long term exposure to Nancy could make Rock Hudson gay.

    PEACE 😇
  615. @songbird
    Did Nancy Pelosi have her children through artificial insemination? What does A123 think?

    I've long thought it was an interesting game to pick horrible politicians like her and try to think of a few rules that might have prevented their rise to power.

    Pelosi passes the test of having had children which Merkel and Harris and many other female pols fail, but not all (Truss, who could have been banned for infidelity). But were they naturally conceived? If not then that would would have been a successful way to remove her.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @A123

    A bunch of these 1% er fems use surrogate mothers to carry and nurse their offspring as they don’t have the will to perform the work themselves and they have the money to burn. I wonder how old the kids are when mommy comes clean about their origin.

    It sure was funny this morning when four separate stories showed up in newlinks at the same time. The best one I saw had a Hillary Clinton tweet about how only a deplorable could even think of doing this. To be fair we don’t actually know what happened. The thing is even though it might not be the absolute worst it is a safe bet it’s pretty bad.

    • Agree: songbird
    • Replies: @songbird
    @Emil Nikola Richard

    Would be pretty gnarly if the woman that the media are always routing as a grandmother had all of her children born using Amazonian tribeswomen surrogates, like in "The Boys from Brazil."

  616. @A123
    @Mikel


    supported a MAGA movement ... abandon foreign military interventions and commitments (before his leader forgot what platform he had won the election with)
     
    Trump kept the MAGA "Anti-War" platform he won on. Everyone understands this objective TRUTH.

    Notable achievements included:

    1. Trump is the first President in modern history to start ZERO new wars. This is a massive achievement that should be celebrated by all Americans.

    It is especially momentous, as Trump had to contend with sociopath Khamenei who was openly trying to provoke a war.

     
    https://joannenova.com.au/wp-content/presidents-wars.jpg
     

    2. Trump pulled U.S. troops out of the kill sack between Turkish and Syrian/Russian lines. "Protecting Oil" was a fig leaf believed by no one. Functionally, the U.S. efforts now provide intelligence on Iranian terrorists operating in Syria and Western Iraq, and little else.

    Trump also made it clear that the U.S. would not support Erdogan's aggression. The NATO defensive alliance would not back a Turkish offensive operation.

    3. Trump effectively ended the Afghan War.

     
    https://i.dawn.com/primary/2020/10/5f7f8869c725d.jpg
     

    Gen. SJW Milley's treachery was avoided. We will never know whether if that was Trump personally not trusting the traitor. Or, if senior staff headed off the trap. Probably both.

    If Trump received the 2nd term that he won at the ballot box, there would have been a deal & orderly pull out centered on Bagram.
    ___

    MAGA (under Donald Trump) ratcheted down SJW Globalist Forever Wars across the globe.

    What more could anyone want that is "actually achievable"?

    Did Trump achieve 100% of absolutely, totally, everything, across the entire globe? Of course not, that simply was not available. No President can possibly deliver 100% of absolutely, totally, everything. The American system does NOT work that way.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @Sean

    Gen. SJW Milley is the man who pushed adaptation of the HIMARS, fourteen of which were enough to check the Russian logistics necessary for their advances. Ukraine fought Russia somewhat asymmetrically and Russia responded by and ongoing methodical targeting Ukraine’s energy system

    Milley’s undertaking to warn China of a US first strike was quite reasonable in view of the fact that China has very few ICBM’s compared to what it could have because China has been pursuing a commercial path to unchallengeable strength, and frightening China could change that. And the assurance concerned ICBMs being used out the blue.

    Milley has had a a few calls with his Russian counterpart GenValery Gerasimov (who the US spared from its now suspended assassination campaign against RusFed commanders). . However thanks to Milley pet project becoming an American gift to Ukraine allied to omniscient US surveillance and intel, HIMARS has done too good a job and the Russian are now abandoning nass in attack for using drones and cruise missiles against essential utilities in Ukraine’s cities and towns. Russia is actually doing quite well with its new strategy and the better they do the less chance they’ll start toying with the idea of a tactical nuke.

    As John Keegan said, battles are aimed at the disintegration of human groups. I believe the Russians are moving from attacks on the cohesion of military formations to the morale of the population in ‘decision making centres’ (ie cities). That strategy won’t kill a lot of people, but it will disconcert the Ukrainian leadership.

    • Replies: @A123
    @Sean

    Gen. SJW Milley is the man who pushed adaptation of the HIMARS,
     

    It is much more likely that any success is "despite" this piece of human detritus, rather than "because" of his wokeness.

    Are you really singing praises for Gen. SJW Milley's competence?

     
    https://img.ifunny.co/images/612b8bcd55fa86347e34d044916ec4a317ca9c16e66dc9ba00f4c4ba93af27d3_1.jpg
     

    You must be proud of his success, arranging for American troops to die in Afghanistan. His "withdrawal" plan was intentionally designed to fail.


    Milley’s undertaking to warn China of a US first strike was quite reasonable
     
    ROTFL. So you believe Sun Tzu said this?

     
    https://snuggleduck.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/general-milley-mi-li-sun-tzu.jpeg
     

    Your praise for Gen. SJW Milley is very Ukie-stan. Only enemies of God & Christianity like this guy.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @Sean, @Wokechoke

    , @LondonBob
    @Sean


    Gen. SJW Milley is the man who pushed adaptation of the HIMARS, fourteen of which were enough to check the Russian logistics necessary for their advances. Ukraine fought Russia somewhat asymmetrically and Russia responded by and ongoing methodical targeting Ukraine’s energy system

     

    Russia finally stalled due to a lack of men, remarkable they advanced so much given the disparity, but the introduction of the Ukrainians trained in the West and 'mercenaries', along with contract endings, had an inevitable impact.

    I believe the Russians are moving from attacks on the cohesion of military formations to the morale of the population in ‘decision making centres’ (ie cities). That strategy won’t kill a lot of people, but it will disconcert the Ukrainian leadership.
     
    No. They are degrading the logistics, the impact of which will lead to the Klain-Blinken regime having a simple choice of fold or escalate, the tactical nuke talk is from those who wish to escalate.

    http://johnhelmer.net/electro-shock-therapy-for-slow-learners-in-the-electric-war-part-iii/
  617. @songbird
    Did Nancy Pelosi have her children through artificial insemination? What does A123 think?

    I've long thought it was an interesting game to pick horrible politicians like her and try to think of a few rules that might have prevented their rise to power.

    Pelosi passes the test of having had children which Merkel and Harris and many other female pols fail, but not all (Truss, who could have been banned for infidelity). But were they naturally conceived? If not then that would would have been a successful way to remove her.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @A123

    Did Nancy Pelosi have her children through artificial insemination? What does A123 think?

    It would be interesting to see a DNA test vs. JFK.

     

     

    Also, Paul may have been straight when they were married. Long term exposure to Nancy could make Rock Hudson gay.

    PEACE 😇

    • LOL: songbird
  618. @Bashibuzuk
    @Dmitry

    Yes I read the Bible and of course I have also read the Gospels, which I re-read many times. I have also read the Gnostic Apocrypha and re-read them now and then. The Judgement Day mentioned by Our Lord Jesus might have simply been the moment a person dies.

    Each one of us would then face our own personal Judgement Day. Otherwise, we must accept that our Lord Jesus was mistaken when he said to his Apostles that he will judge their generation. I don't believe that the Son of Man was mistaken, people were and they didn't understand and/or record his sayings properly.

    BTW, Jesus sayings are presented as is in the Apocryphal Gospel of Thomas, some of the sayings and parables are somewhat longer and more complete in the Gospel of Thomas, others are only to be found in the Gospel of Thomas and are absent from the Synaptic Gospels. Anyone interested in Our Lord's sayings should have also a look at the Gospel of Thomas.

    http://www.gnosis.org/naghamm/gosthom-meyer.html

    Gospel of Mary Magdalen is also worth reading, although its very beginning and its central part are unreadable because the codex was too badly damaged. Nevertheless, please see an excerpt below:


    The Savior said, All nature, all formations, all creatures exist in and with one another, and they will be resolved again into their own roots. For the nature of matter is resolved into the roots of its own nature alone.
     
    http://gnosis.org/library/marygosp.htm

    This is of course quite similar to the codependent origination in Buddhism.

    Regarding rebirth in Buddhadharma, the Buddha insisted on the absence of Self in our being and the transitory and impermanent nature of our Ego. If we follow his teaching to its logical limits, then there is nobody who is reincarnated. And yet, Buddhadharma teaches rebirth. The question then is "who or what exactly is "reborn"?"

    😉

    Replies: @Dmitry

    he will judge their generation

    It is popular to re-interpret prophecy of Jesus, that it will be “within a single generation” (the events of the end times), not “this generation” (of the Apostles) that will see the end times. But this prophecy of Jesus begins with the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem. Gospel of Mark (which is the mastertext, which other Gospels are derived from) is written around 70 AD.

    70 AD is the year Romans destroy Jerusalem. After sieging Jerusalem for months, they destroy the Temple.

    So, the prophecy of Jesus, begins with the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem, and the mastertext (Gospel of Mark) of the Gospels, is written at this time when the Temple is destroyed.

    It was seeming to be about the generation which had seen the destruction of the Temple, which is the same time the Gospel (on which other Gospels are based) is written. The prophecy of Jesus begins with the same event, when the text is written (Gospel of Mark is written around 30 years after the death of Jesus).

    In the minimum, we know the prophecy begins with the destruction of Temple and (according to re-interpretation) all events of end times will be seen in this a single generation.

    If we assume Jesus must be correct (and Gospels has correctly written his views), then re-interpret the prophecy “this generation” to “within a single generation” (which maybe be difficult for some people to accept), then it means the Temple will have to be rebuilt, before the times of the tribulation.

    For the Temple to be destroyed, it would have to be rebuilt first. At the moment, there are no plans to rebuild the Temple in Jerusalem, so you can all relax about worrying the apocalypse will be happening soon, if you accept the prophecy of Jesus as written in Gospels must be true.

    If you wake one day and read on the CNN site they plan to rebuild the Temple, that you can begin to worry.

    Buddhadharma teaches rebirth. The question then is “who or what exactly is “reborn”?”

    Well, think about the person e.g. Donald Trump.

    Their persona, we all know from the public life. On the other hand, perhaps their family and friend will know their ego – which is their thoughts, feeling, memory and habits. And the continuation of this across time is likely dependent on the health of their body. If they have Alzheimer’s they will lose this.

    But what is there without this? There is person when they are not thinking, feeling or remembering.

    The question whether this nonthinking, nonrememering person can continue without the body and Trump’s soul when not thinking is different than e.g. Biden?

    Self in our being and the transitory and impermanent

    Although peoples’ anecdotes about re-incarnation, will usually be based in the memories of the children. https://tinyurl.com/2rx24cay If you believe memories would transmigrate (which I’m not sure is supported by Buddhism), it would be like we were using cloud storage
    solution instead of the onboard storage devices we would assume.

    might have simply been the moment a person dies.

    Time would be feature of the physical reality, or how consciousness is processing it. But as the person dies, it would not be necessary to assume. “This moment” of death, would not necessarily be differentiated, if you assume this is not the closure of the person. I.e. it would possible to assume everyone dies at the same moment.

  619. @silviosilver
    @Bashibuzuk


    He has created a Universe (actually a Multiverse comprising possibly an infinite number of Universes) that allows his creatures an infinite potential of freedom and evolution.
     
    I'm not so sure. It seems to me there are plenty of things I do not have the "potential" to do - fly like a bird, swim like a fish, regenerate limbs. So my potential may be great, but it is surely something less than "infinite." (Or maybe you were being poetic?)

    Or to get at the same point a little differently, how do know that our abilities, as we understand them, allow for infinite freedom - or the maximal freedom possible in this universe? Can we ever really be sure of that? Or are we just jumping to that conclusion because we want to praise God and this sounds like the sort of thing that would please him?

    Because if it's not actually true that we enjoy the maximal amount of freedom possible, then it opens up the possibility that the degree of suffering could in fact have been set at a lower point than the level we know, and we wouldn't necessarily lose any freedom as a result. In other words, we could be just as we are, have the same potential we have, but the level of suffering in the universe could be, say, 50% lower.


    He has shown us the way that would be best for us to follow to evolve towards Him and as rapidly as possible shed as much imperfection (that you call sin) as possible.
     
    I didn't invent the concept of sin. That's been passed down to us by Christian thinkers. God hates sin, they say. Hates it so much that, if you sin, he wants you out of his sight. Worse, seemingly vindictively, he'll torture you for an eternity if you commit sin. That's how much he hates it. But then why create it If you hate peanut butter, would you make yourself a peanut butter sandwich, and then complain to everyone at work how much you hate your lunch? Is that smart?

    And if you know everything, and you create a creature that you know is going to sin and displease you - because that's the way you made it - shouldn't you blame yourself rather than your creation for acting the way it does? Sorry if that sounds snarky, but these are questions I've never managed to answer to my satisfaction (and my bar is set pretty low; anything halfway plausible would put me at ease, or at least that's what I think).

    It seems to me that most (even all) these difficulties could be avoided by relaxing our assumptions about God's omnipotence, omniscience or omnibenevolent. Say there's something that seems logically possible, but God can't do it. Would that really be the end of the world? Or what if God doesn't actually know the future. Maybe he can predict it scarily accurately, but - crucially - less than 100% accurately. Or maybe he could know it if he wanted to, but he chooses not to (for reasons of his own - but maybe something like if you're watching the replay of a sportsball match, it's less exciting if you already know the outcome). Or maybe he's not quite as caring or loving as we've been led to think. This is the hardest one to swallow, but the easiest to reconcile with our experience of existence.

    Replies: @sudden death, @Dmitry, @Coconuts

    In the Bible, God has a very unambiguous answer for these questions.

    Although the answer, is including “don’t ask these questions, human”.

    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Job+38-42%3A6&version=AMP

    It’s maybe psychologically healthy for the humans. “Don’t ask questions”.

    • Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Dmitry

    I love Job. Also there are the greatest commentaries on Job. Maimonedes: the Bible tells us in several places that Job was good; in no place does it report he was clever.

    , @silviosilver
    @Dmitry


    It’s maybe psychologically healthy for the humans. “Don’t ask questions”.
     
    Yeah, for some people that's probably the best approach.

    It's not for everyone though.
  620. @Sean
    @A123

    Gen. SJW Milley is the man who pushed adaptation of the HIMARS, fourteen of which were enough to check the Russian logistics necessary for their advances. Ukraine fought Russia somewhat asymmetrically and Russia responded by and ongoing methodical targeting Ukraine's energy system

    Milley's undertaking to warn China of a US first strike was quite reasonable in view of the fact that China has very few ICBM's compared to what it could have because China has been pursuing a commercial path to unchallengeable strength, and frightening China could change that. And the assurance concerned ICBMs being used out the blue.

    Milley has had a a few calls with his Russian counterpart GenValery Gerasimov (who the US spared from its now suspended assassination campaign against RusFed commanders). . However thanks to Milley pet project becoming an American gift to Ukraine allied to omniscient US surveillance and intel, HIMARS has done too good a job and the Russian are now abandoning nass in attack for using drones and cruise missiles against essential utilities in Ukraine's cities and towns. Russia is actually doing quite well with its new strategy and the better they do the less chance they'll start toying with the idea of a tactical nuke.

    As John Keegan said, battles are aimed at the disintegration of human groups. I believe the Russians are moving from attacks on the cohesion of military formations to the morale of the population in 'decision making centres' (ie cities). That strategy won't kill a lot of people, but it will disconcert the Ukrainian leadership.

    Replies: @A123, @LondonBob

    Gen. SJW Milley is the man who pushed adaptation of the HIMARS,

    It is much more likely that any success is “despite” this piece of human detritus, rather than “because” of his wokeness.

    Are you really singing praises for Gen. SJW Milley’s competence?

      

    You must be proud of his success, arranging for American troops to die in Afghanistan. His “withdrawal” plan was intentionally designed to fail.

    Milley’s undertaking to warn China of a US first strike was quite reasonable

    ROTFL. So you believe Sun Tzu said this?

      

    Your praise for Gen. SJW Milley is very Ukie-stan. Only enemies of God & Christianity like this guy.

    PEACE 😇

    • Replies: @Sean
    @A123

    Benedict Arnold was a very good soldier, he just didn't think Catholics were Christians, which was more common a belief back then; Washington had to forbid his army from their yearly burning of the Pope in effigy'. When Washinton made common cause with French Quebec Catholics and his emissary attended a Mass, Arnold thought the principles of the Revolution had been abandoned.

    If Milley's pet project the HIMARS gets within range of Crimea it will all be over for Russia's post 2014 gains.


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K33wlJXNyxY

    Replies: @A123

    , @Wokechoke
    @A123

    The thing about Arnold is that he was the general most responsible for the victory of the Patriot Cause. He won the key battles, led the capture of the British cannon at Ticonderoga, led the failed but brave expedition to Quebec, won the naval battles on Lake Champlain and basically won the battle of Saratoga. He took a bullet at the end of that battle, recovered, became a politico and was then out politicked by Nathan Greene.

    He betrayed no one apart from George Washington personally. Had a lot of integrity. Too much integrity. Like Achilles.

  621. @Dmitry
    @silviosilver

    In the Bible, God has a very unambiguous answer for these questions.

    Although the answer, is including "don't ask these questions, human".

    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Job+38-42%3A6&version=AMP

    It's maybe psychologically healthy for the humans. "Don't ask questions".

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @silviosilver

    I love Job. Also there are the greatest commentaries on Job. Maimonedes: the Bible tells us in several places that Job was good; in no place does it report he was clever.

    • LOL: Bashibuzuk
  622. @Mr. Hack
    @Bashibuzuk


    We cannot detach from God. God is the ground of being on which our existences unfold.
     
    I'm very pleased to hear that you seem to be returning to your religious roots, that is Orthodox Christianity.

    It is exceptional in that it is entirely aligned with classical Greek philosophy. This is of course not surprising, given that Ismaili were originally Islamic Neoplatonicists.

     

    Since you seem to exceptionally value classical Greek philosophy and neoplatonic thought, than you must surely value Orthodoxy too.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk, @Dmitry

    returning to your religious roots

    All abrahamic religion in Russia is not the deepest religious roots, as it has 40 generations since the rulers assimilated the exotic new religion superficially (for example, Christianity by Kiev rulers and Islam in ancestors of Tatars), but the assimilation to the population has been uneven and narrowly controlled. Still, the old gods had retreated to the forest, and did not have difficulty to re-appear in local stories and customs, which would often not be written until the 19th century.

    When a religion is developed for more than thousand years before it is taken to the country, it is like if Japan would become Islamic now, and the Japanese gods would have to follow the writing of Arabs more thousand years earlier.

    The religion has been developed by other people for thousands of years in a exotic different world. You don’t have access to the source code. You are given a licensed copy of the software and you can learn to read it, but many of the features have been disabled.

    In addition, it’s only the rulers who have local administrator access to the software and they don’t allow the normal people to learn to read the code.

    When there is a software update that is perceived as downgrade by some in the 17th century and which has removed local customizations, but which allows the rulers to increase their control of the features , the people who want to continue to use older version of the software are being killed and viewed as rebels against the state.

    When ordinary people learn to read the manual, they try to program their own version, and can be persecuted as heretic likes the Molokans.

    This isn’t to say that assimilating the foreign software is negative. It opens to the information and culture network of the other users, which can include the much of the world’s knowledge and wisdom.

    Especially with Christianity, when the country adopted the religion, it plugged you into the common information space of Europe which (unlike Islam) developed the civilization of modern world of second millennium, the institutions for learning, the lingua franca. It’s connecting as even distant node in the networks which were used for renaissance, scientific revolution and enlightenment.

    • Replies: @Bashibuzuk
    @Dmitry


    It’s connecting as even distant node in the networks which were used for renaissance, scientific revolution and enlightenment.
     
    Please, don't give me yet another reason to stay away from Jesus' warmth.

    (Just kidding...)

    I'm pretty certain that Rav. Yeshua would have found it really amusing to witness firsthand all the stories the Goyim have spun about him.

    Now, seriously, this comment of yours is probably one of the best that I have ever read on this forum. Christian people don't seem to understand that their ancestors had a philosophy and a religion of their own before their rulers for a lot of (supposedly good) reasons just threw away 3000 years of tradition. And they don't get the simple fact that the gods of their ancestors live in their Jungian Subconscious Space to this very day.

    Archetypes are very hard, probably even impossible to erase. I commented a couple of months ago about my favorite passage in Foucault's Pendulum being the story of the progressive academic mulato Brazilian girlfriend that suddenly starts channeling a Condomble deity during a street performance to which she reluctantly attends.

    I wish Mr Hack could come and do some canoe camping with me in Karelia for a couple of months, around the place where according to some article I read a few years ago and which title I forgot, a Y haplogroup R1a male skeleton has been found possibly around 10 000 years old.

    Genetic memories could’ve potentially come back past the Christian firewall and the Svyatovid Archetype suddenly could've manifested itself in Mr Hack's mind in a radiant blaze of glory: Swastikas spinning and thunderbolts crashing all around! (I would have surreptitiously added some Amanita muscaria to his tea...).

    https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/18485609

    Even more seriously, Jesus was a great Bodhisattva who has acquired his healing powers in the Therapeutae community near Alexandria...

    😁

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk, @Mr. Hack, @Mr. Hack, @Seraphim, @LatW

  623. Bashibuzuk says:
    @Dmitry
    @Mr. Hack


    returning to your religious roots

     

    All abrahamic religion in Russia is not the deepest religious roots, as it has 40 generations since the rulers assimilated the exotic new religion superficially (for example, Christianity by Kiev rulers and Islam in ancestors of Tatars), but the assimilation to the population has been uneven and narrowly controlled. Still, the old gods had retreated to the forest, and did not have difficulty to re-appear in local stories and customs, which would often not be written until the 19th century.

    When a religion is developed for more than thousand years before it is taken to the country, it is like if Japan would become Islamic now, and the Japanese gods would have to follow the writing of Arabs more thousand years earlier.

    The religion has been developed by other people for thousands of years in a exotic different world. You don't have access to the source code. You are given a licensed copy of the software and you can learn to read it, but many of the features have been disabled.

    In addition, it's only the rulers who have local administrator access to the software and they don't allow the normal people to learn to read the code.

    When there is a software update that is perceived as downgrade by some in the 17th century and which has removed local customizations, but which allows the rulers to increase their control of the features , the people who want to continue to use older version of the software are being killed and viewed as rebels against the state.

    When ordinary people learn to read the manual, they try to program their own version, and can be persecuted as heretic likes the Molokans.

    This isn't to say that assimilating the foreign software is negative. It opens to the information and culture network of the other users, which can include the much of the world's knowledge and wisdom.

    Especially with Christianity, when the country adopted the religion, it plugged you into the common information space of Europe which (unlike Islam) developed the civilization of modern world of second millennium, the institutions for learning, the lingua franca. It's connecting as even distant node in the networks which were used for renaissance, scientific revolution and enlightenment.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

    It’s connecting as even distant node in the networks which were used for renaissance, scientific revolution and enlightenment.

    Please, don’t give me yet another reason to stay away from Jesus’ warmth.

    (Just kidding…)

    I’m pretty certain that Rav. Yeshua would have found it really amusing to witness firsthand all the stories the Goyim have spun about him.

    Now, seriously, this comment of yours is probably one of the best that I have ever read on this forum. Christian people don’t seem to understand that their ancestors had a philosophy and a religion of their own before their rulers for a lot of (supposedly good) reasons just threw away 3000 years of tradition. And they don’t get the simple fact that the gods of their ancestors live in their Jungian Subconscious Space to this very day.

    Archetypes are very hard, probably even impossible to erase. I commented a couple of months ago about my favorite passage in Foucault’s Pendulum being the story of the progressive academic mulato Brazilian girlfriend that suddenly starts channeling a Condomble deity during a street performance to which she reluctantly attends.

    I wish Mr Hack could come and do some canoe camping with me in Karelia for a couple of months, around the place where according to some article I read a few years ago and which title I forgot, a Y haplogroup R1a male skeleton has been found possibly around 10 000 years old.

    Genetic memories could’ve potentially come back past the Christian firewall and the Svyatovid Archetype suddenly could’ve manifested itself in Mr Hack’s mind in a radiant blaze of glory: Swastikas spinning and thunderbolts crashing all around! (I would have surreptitiously added some Amanita muscaria to his tea…).

    https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/18485609

    Even more seriously, Jesus was a great Bodhisattva who has acquired his healing powers in the Therapeutae community near Alexandria…

    😁

    • Replies: @Bashibuzuk
    @Bashibuzuk

    Speaking of ancient gods, Archetypes, Brazil and Foucault's Pendulum, today they've re-elected Lula there. I wonder what this leftist champion of the Global(ist) South would have thought of the videoclip below.



    https://youtu.be/F_6IjeprfEs

    Funny how the multiculty Brazilian lefties from Sepultura come to feel something very close to what was also experienced by the neo-Nazi left-hand path guys from M8l8th so dear to the hearts of the Misanthropic Division core of what later became Azov Battalion.

    Archetypes are hard to erase.

    Genetic memories are impossible to uproot completely.

    When the veneer of civilization wears off, the Archetypes come back with a vengeance.

    Happy Samhain everyone !

    🙂

    , @Mr. Hack
    @Bashibuzuk


    Christian people don’t seem to understand that their ancestors had a philosophy and a religion of their own before their rulers for a lot of (supposedly good) reasons just threw away 3000 years of tradition. And they don’t get the simple fact that the gods of their ancestors live in their Jungian Subconscious Space to this very day.
     
    I'm all for studying the religions of our ancestors, and for gaining any valuable spiritual values therein, however, as of yet, beyond the adaptation of pysanki and Christmas trees, have found little of value in the old religions. Certainly no other religious philosophy have I deemed to be comparable to what Christianity offers within the concept of Theosis. Nothing even comes close.

    Genetic memories could’ve potentially come back past the Christian firewall and the Svyatovid Archetype suddenly could’ve manifested itself in Mr Hack’s mind in a radiant blaze of glory
     
    Having tried hallucinogenic drugs in my youth, and never having experienced a "bad trip", I still find the idea of needing drugs in order to elevate my spiritual awareness to be folly. I'm much more interested in spiritual visions that can be obtained in a sober state of mind. Three months of intermittent sightings of the Holy Spirit with eyes shut closed climaxing by a three day period of observing the Holy Spirt up close, as a magnificent large image of a white dove - now that's exciting and life changing............
    , @Mr. Hack
    @Bashibuzuk


    Even more seriously, Jesus was a great Bodhisattva who has acquired his healing powers in the Therapeutae community near Alexandria…
     
    In this statement, you sound like a marketer for the New Age religion that is being created by the cultural and political elites for the modern world, where all religious leaders and religions are supposedly treated as equal paths, that all lead to the same outcome...I have a book somewhere within my library where the story that you're repeating also includes Jesus' side trip and "education" continuing in India somewhere. How does one educate the son of God, who shares in the omniscient knowledge of his Father as part as the mystery known as the Trinity? Of course none of these trips to religious schools is based on any primary sources, but are made up myths to lead people astray. This New Age religion is supported by those world elites that you so often criticize for bringing the world to its final destruction. No, Jesus was not a Bodhisattva, for he finally left the earth for his Heavenly home, and by doing so revealed the magnificent powers of the Holy Spirit.
    , @Seraphim
    @Bashibuzuk

    You don't need to give us any reason for ''staying away from Jesus’ warmth''. You are in the cold from the get-go, Väinämöinen! Stay there. You'll get into NATO.

    , @LatW
    @Bashibuzuk


    https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/18485609
     


    This was quite an explosive book. A friend of mine in Russia sent me a copy back in the day (the one with the dark red cover, still have it somewhere on the bookshelf). A few years after he sent it, it was banned. Interesting book (although it takes it a bit too far), interesting how it was possible for this type of literature to float around for a good decade.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

  624. Bashibuzuk says:
    @Bashibuzuk
    @Dmitry


    It’s connecting as even distant node in the networks which were used for renaissance, scientific revolution and enlightenment.
     
    Please, don't give me yet another reason to stay away from Jesus' warmth.

    (Just kidding...)

    I'm pretty certain that Rav. Yeshua would have found it really amusing to witness firsthand all the stories the Goyim have spun about him.

    Now, seriously, this comment of yours is probably one of the best that I have ever read on this forum. Christian people don't seem to understand that their ancestors had a philosophy and a religion of their own before their rulers for a lot of (supposedly good) reasons just threw away 3000 years of tradition. And they don't get the simple fact that the gods of their ancestors live in their Jungian Subconscious Space to this very day.

    Archetypes are very hard, probably even impossible to erase. I commented a couple of months ago about my favorite passage in Foucault's Pendulum being the story of the progressive academic mulato Brazilian girlfriend that suddenly starts channeling a Condomble deity during a street performance to which she reluctantly attends.

    I wish Mr Hack could come and do some canoe camping with me in Karelia for a couple of months, around the place where according to some article I read a few years ago and which title I forgot, a Y haplogroup R1a male skeleton has been found possibly around 10 000 years old.

    Genetic memories could’ve potentially come back past the Christian firewall and the Svyatovid Archetype suddenly could've manifested itself in Mr Hack's mind in a radiant blaze of glory: Swastikas spinning and thunderbolts crashing all around! (I would have surreptitiously added some Amanita muscaria to his tea...).

    https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/18485609

    Even more seriously, Jesus was a great Bodhisattva who has acquired his healing powers in the Therapeutae community near Alexandria...

    😁

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk, @Mr. Hack, @Mr. Hack, @Seraphim, @LatW

    Speaking of ancient gods, Archetypes, Brazil and Foucault’s Pendulum, today they’ve re-elected Lula there. I wonder what this leftist champion of the Global(ist) South would have thought of the videoclip below.

    [MORE]

    Funny how the multiculty Brazilian lefties from Sepultura come to feel something very close to what was also experienced by the neo-Nazi left-hand path guys from M8l8th so dear to the hearts of the Misanthropic Division core of what later became Azov Battalion.

    Archetypes are hard to erase.

    Genetic memories are impossible to uproot completely.

    When the veneer of civilization wears off, the Archetypes come back with a vengeance.

    Happy Samhain everyone !

    🙂

  625. @Bashibuzuk
    @Dmitry


    It’s connecting as even distant node in the networks which were used for renaissance, scientific revolution and enlightenment.
     
    Please, don't give me yet another reason to stay away from Jesus' warmth.

    (Just kidding...)

    I'm pretty certain that Rav. Yeshua would have found it really amusing to witness firsthand all the stories the Goyim have spun about him.

    Now, seriously, this comment of yours is probably one of the best that I have ever read on this forum. Christian people don't seem to understand that their ancestors had a philosophy and a religion of their own before their rulers for a lot of (supposedly good) reasons just threw away 3000 years of tradition. And they don't get the simple fact that the gods of their ancestors live in their Jungian Subconscious Space to this very day.

    Archetypes are very hard, probably even impossible to erase. I commented a couple of months ago about my favorite passage in Foucault's Pendulum being the story of the progressive academic mulato Brazilian girlfriend that suddenly starts channeling a Condomble deity during a street performance to which she reluctantly attends.

    I wish Mr Hack could come and do some canoe camping with me in Karelia for a couple of months, around the place where according to some article I read a few years ago and which title I forgot, a Y haplogroup R1a male skeleton has been found possibly around 10 000 years old.

    Genetic memories could’ve potentially come back past the Christian firewall and the Svyatovid Archetype suddenly could've manifested itself in Mr Hack's mind in a radiant blaze of glory: Swastikas spinning and thunderbolts crashing all around! (I would have surreptitiously added some Amanita muscaria to his tea...).

    https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/18485609

    Even more seriously, Jesus was a great Bodhisattva who has acquired his healing powers in the Therapeutae community near Alexandria...

    😁

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk, @Mr. Hack, @Mr. Hack, @Seraphim, @LatW

    Christian people don’t seem to understand that their ancestors had a philosophy and a religion of their own before their rulers for a lot of (supposedly good) reasons just threw away 3000 years of tradition. And they don’t get the simple fact that the gods of their ancestors live in their Jungian Subconscious Space to this very day.

    I’m all for studying the religions of our ancestors, and for gaining any valuable spiritual values therein, however, as of yet, beyond the adaptation of pysanki and Christmas trees, have found little of value in the old religions. Certainly no other religious philosophy have I deemed to be comparable to what Christianity offers within the concept of Theosis. Nothing even comes close.

    Genetic memories could’ve potentially come back past the Christian firewall and the Svyatovid Archetype suddenly could’ve manifested itself in Mr Hack’s mind in a radiant blaze of glory

    Having tried hallucinogenic drugs in my youth, and never having experienced a “bad trip”, I still find the idea of needing drugs in order to elevate my spiritual awareness to be folly. I’m much more interested in spiritual visions that can be obtained in a sober state of mind. Three months of intermittent sightings of the Holy Spirit with eyes shut closed climaxing by a three day period of observing the Holy Spirt up close, as a magnificent large image of a white dove – now that’s exciting and life changing…………

  626. @Bashibuzuk
    @Dmitry


    It’s connecting as even distant node in the networks which were used for renaissance, scientific revolution and enlightenment.
     
    Please, don't give me yet another reason to stay away from Jesus' warmth.

    (Just kidding...)

    I'm pretty certain that Rav. Yeshua would have found it really amusing to witness firsthand all the stories the Goyim have spun about him.

    Now, seriously, this comment of yours is probably one of the best that I have ever read on this forum. Christian people don't seem to understand that their ancestors had a philosophy and a religion of their own before their rulers for a lot of (supposedly good) reasons just threw away 3000 years of tradition. And they don't get the simple fact that the gods of their ancestors live in their Jungian Subconscious Space to this very day.

    Archetypes are very hard, probably even impossible to erase. I commented a couple of months ago about my favorite passage in Foucault's Pendulum being the story of the progressive academic mulato Brazilian girlfriend that suddenly starts channeling a Condomble deity during a street performance to which she reluctantly attends.

    I wish Mr Hack could come and do some canoe camping with me in Karelia for a couple of months, around the place where according to some article I read a few years ago and which title I forgot, a Y haplogroup R1a male skeleton has been found possibly around 10 000 years old.

    Genetic memories could’ve potentially come back past the Christian firewall and the Svyatovid Archetype suddenly could've manifested itself in Mr Hack's mind in a radiant blaze of glory: Swastikas spinning and thunderbolts crashing all around! (I would have surreptitiously added some Amanita muscaria to his tea...).

    https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/18485609

    Even more seriously, Jesus was a great Bodhisattva who has acquired his healing powers in the Therapeutae community near Alexandria...

    😁

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk, @Mr. Hack, @Mr. Hack, @Seraphim, @LatW

    Even more seriously, Jesus was a great Bodhisattva who has acquired his healing powers in the Therapeutae community near Alexandria…

    In this statement, you sound like a marketer for the New Age religion that is being created by the cultural and political elites for the modern world, where all religious leaders and religions are supposedly treated as equal paths, that all lead to the same outcome…I have a book somewhere within my library where the story that you’re repeating also includes Jesus’ side trip and “education” continuing in India somewhere. How does one educate the son of God, who shares in the omniscient knowledge of his Father as part as the mystery known as the Trinity? Of course none of these trips to religious schools is based on any primary sources, but are made up myths to lead people astray. This New Age religion is supported by those world elites that you so often criticize for bringing the world to its final destruction. No, Jesus was not a Bodhisattva, for he finally left the earth for his Heavenly home, and by doing so revealed the magnificent powers of the Holy Spirit.

  627. @Bashibuzuk
    @Dmitry


    It’s connecting as even distant node in the networks which were used for renaissance, scientific revolution and enlightenment.
     
    Please, don't give me yet another reason to stay away from Jesus' warmth.

    (Just kidding...)

    I'm pretty certain that Rav. Yeshua would have found it really amusing to witness firsthand all the stories the Goyim have spun about him.

    Now, seriously, this comment of yours is probably one of the best that I have ever read on this forum. Christian people don't seem to understand that their ancestors had a philosophy and a religion of their own before their rulers for a lot of (supposedly good) reasons just threw away 3000 years of tradition. And they don't get the simple fact that the gods of their ancestors live in their Jungian Subconscious Space to this very day.

    Archetypes are very hard, probably even impossible to erase. I commented a couple of months ago about my favorite passage in Foucault's Pendulum being the story of the progressive academic mulato Brazilian girlfriend that suddenly starts channeling a Condomble deity during a street performance to which she reluctantly attends.

    I wish Mr Hack could come and do some canoe camping with me in Karelia for a couple of months, around the place where according to some article I read a few years ago and which title I forgot, a Y haplogroup R1a male skeleton has been found possibly around 10 000 years old.

    Genetic memories could’ve potentially come back past the Christian firewall and the Svyatovid Archetype suddenly could've manifested itself in Mr Hack's mind in a radiant blaze of glory: Swastikas spinning and thunderbolts crashing all around! (I would have surreptitiously added some Amanita muscaria to his tea...).

    https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/18485609

    Even more seriously, Jesus was a great Bodhisattva who has acquired his healing powers in the Therapeutae community near Alexandria...

    😁

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk, @Mr. Hack, @Mr. Hack, @Seraphim, @LatW

    You don’t need to give us any reason for ”staying away from Jesus’ warmth”. You are in the cold from the get-go, Väinämöinen! Stay there. You’ll get into NATO.

    • LOL: Bashibuzuk
  628. @Bashibuzuk
    @Dmitry


    It’s connecting as even distant node in the networks which were used for renaissance, scientific revolution and enlightenment.
     
    Please, don't give me yet another reason to stay away from Jesus' warmth.

    (Just kidding...)

    I'm pretty certain that Rav. Yeshua would have found it really amusing to witness firsthand all the stories the Goyim have spun about him.

    Now, seriously, this comment of yours is probably one of the best that I have ever read on this forum. Christian people don't seem to understand that their ancestors had a philosophy and a religion of their own before their rulers for a lot of (supposedly good) reasons just threw away 3000 years of tradition. And they don't get the simple fact that the gods of their ancestors live in their Jungian Subconscious Space to this very day.

    Archetypes are very hard, probably even impossible to erase. I commented a couple of months ago about my favorite passage in Foucault's Pendulum being the story of the progressive academic mulato Brazilian girlfriend that suddenly starts channeling a Condomble deity during a street performance to which she reluctantly attends.

    I wish Mr Hack could come and do some canoe camping with me in Karelia for a couple of months, around the place where according to some article I read a few years ago and which title I forgot, a Y haplogroup R1a male skeleton has been found possibly around 10 000 years old.

    Genetic memories could’ve potentially come back past the Christian firewall and the Svyatovid Archetype suddenly could've manifested itself in Mr Hack's mind in a radiant blaze of glory: Swastikas spinning and thunderbolts crashing all around! (I would have surreptitiously added some Amanita muscaria to his tea...).

    https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/18485609

    Even more seriously, Jesus was a great Bodhisattva who has acquired his healing powers in the Therapeutae community near Alexandria...

    😁

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk, @Mr. Hack, @Mr. Hack, @Seraphim, @LatW

    https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/18485609

    [MORE]

    This was quite an explosive book. A friend of mine in Russia sent me a copy back in the day (the one with the dark red cover, still have it somewhere on the bookshelf). A few years after he sent it, it was banned. Interesting book (although it takes it a bit too far), interesting how it was possible for this type of literature to float around for a good decade.

    • Replies: @Bashibuzuk
    @LatW

    There were even more hard-core books published back in the day. But the authors of these books did not understand in what world we are living. They actually do not go far enough in their thinking.

    Having discovered the antisemitic (judophobic to be more precise) angle, they seldom make the next step and ask "how did we get there?". For those who do (who are few and far between, Kevin McDonald being one among them, Igor' Shafarevich - another, Laurent Guyenot on this site is also one of them) the analysis becomes more historical and sociological and yields some interesting results. But this is also an intermediate level. Questions about "how does it get to this historical and social organization?" remain. Shafarevich named one of his books "A three thousand years enigma". The "enigmatic" part remains.

    It remains because it is outside the scope of rational and materialist academic analysis and outside of our current tradition of thinking, believing and behaving. The questions asked by the most intelligent among these authors cannot be correctly answered by using our usual intellectual approach. And of course anger and violent exaltation do not lead to the right answers either. They would just lead to suffering of mostly innocent human beings. It happened before and did solve nothing, actually just making the situation worse.

    One has to often go back to the beginnings of the pathology to find the real causative agent, the symptoms and morbid alterations experienced by the patient after years of chronic disease are sometimes not informative enough to pinpoint the real pathogen behind the pathological process. Think of Lyme disease, advanced syphilis or HIV for that matter. Or cancers that might be caused by viruses contracted years ago and gone completely asymptomatic and unnoticed.

    Our whole civilization is affected with a complex disease. Some would say that it is just the reflection of human nature. But humans are social and spiritual animals, their true nature is conditioned by society and spiritually altered by belief systems. Humans are clever monkeys that are capable of metaphysics. Why are we capable of, and sometimes feel the urge of finding meaning behind and beyond the physical realm? That should be the question.

    Because different human primate tribes find different metaphysical answers to their questions. Some of these answers are probably more aligned with the way our Reality functions on a pragmatic level but they end up causing more trouble and suffering than the answers which really aim it for the crux of the matter, the inner core of human nature. One cannot feed oneself with Archetypes, but one becomes spiritually degraded without them and ends up a slave to those who kept the Spiritual Attractors of their ancestors "well fed" and "energized". And those who happen to embody a more aggressive Archetype, bent on expansion and domination become the catalysts of Apocalyptic change ("дрожжи революции") that is the Progress leading to our potential dehumanization and outright destruction as a species.

    That is something the young people who have composed the song below might have understood on an intuitive level. They're up to something here. 988 is the officially recognized date of the Baptism of the Rus, it is of course an historical approximation. Abrahamic religious movements / belief systems arrived to what is now Russia/Ukraine/Belarus earlier and completely triumphed much later. There were still pagans in fifteenth century and "native" Russian Orthodoxy got strongly tainted with pagan psychology, hence the "need" to "rectify" the whole thing during the Raskol.

    https://youtu.be/P8SAtQ4e7Dg

    And Dmitry is absolutely right, one uses a software which characteristics one does not understand at one's own perils. Sometimes one needs to reset the whole system and purge the malware from the hardware to get the things right.

    Anyways, today is the Feast of the Ancestors, we shall direct our memories and our love towards those who made our existence possible through their own lives, suffering and sacrifice.

    С праздником брат!

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Mr. Hack, @LatW

  629. @Mikel
    @Beckow


    That’s not an answer to my question
     
    That's a perfectly valid answer to your question. Just not the one you have decided in advance to be the only correct one so you won't bother considering its merits, which makes a discussion with you on this topic pointless.

    Silviosilver beat me to it but 10 months ago you were not here predicting that Russia would invade because it just had no other choice. Like basically everyone at the time, you surely didn't think Putin would take such an extreme measure as a full invasion of Ukraine. You really come across as someone who will always defend anything Russia does, be it one thing or the opposite.

    The comparison with what other "big countries" would do in Russia's position (just the US really, the rest are second fiddles) doesn't fly with me at all. I'm actually trying to hold Russia to the same standards as I hold the US, where I supported a MAGA movement that was also supposed to concentrate on economic development and abandon foreign military interventions and commitments (before his leader forgot what platform he had won the election with). This movement continues to have plenty of popular support in the US btw and we may one day see it applying those policies in earnest but perhaps it is you who thinks that Russians are too primitive to follow such a civilized course of action.

    I happen to be in favor of the right to secession in almost all circumstances so in my view Russian and other ethnic minorities that ended on the wrong side of the post-USSR borders should be allowed to join whichever state of their liking in properly held referendums. But there are countless countries in the world with ethnic diasporas scattered in neighboring countries (among them some big ones like China or Germany) and they don't go invading their neighbors anymore. Russia has the choice of being just like any of these countries, no more no less.

    The idea that Ukraine possibly joining NATO and oppressing the Russian language left Russia with no choice but to start a war where NATO has enlarged to two additional neighbors, de facto now operates in Ukraine like never before and many more innocent Russophone civilians are being killed by Russia itself than Ukraine ever did is just ridiculous. Western countries' euphemism of "collateral damage" never referred to the killing of their own civilians, btw, which they never did. This war has been a total disaster, even from the perspective of what Russia was supposed to achieve. We are all much worse off because of it, including yourself, but for some strange reason you feel the need to support it.

    Replies: @A123, @Beckow, @Wokechoke, @Philip Owen

    To summarize what you say was a better option for Russia: Do nothing.

    Oh, and open more MacDonalds and quietly hope that Ukraine won’t be in Nato in 2023, but only in 2025, or even 2030.

    Ukraine possibly joining NATO and oppressing the Russian language

    You are not addressing reality: Nato WAS in Ukraine, it was expanding, it was building bases – ‘joint and temporary‘, but in reality Nato bases – the fig leave of postponing formal membership wouldn’t fool a monkey, why do you hide behind ‘possibly’?

    MAGA rule continued with all these policies, incl. Ukraine in Nato. Electing Zelensky by 70% to have peace and equal rights for Russians reversed with speed not seen since De Gaulle pulled out of Algeria. You ignore all of that to talk about some ideals, peace, non-intervention, etc…well, there was a de facto state of war on Russian-Ukie border since 2014. It was escalating, Kiev and the West were raising the stakes.

    I never support any wars because wars are the worst context for conscience and rationality. But to unilaterally blame only Russia for this war is a lie: they were very seriously and forcefully challenged on their own borders and within their own Russian-speaking community. It is incomprehensible that you would claim that other nations would put up with it. And the best analogy is US – Russia and US are roughly comparable. If one can, so can the other.

    In wars force prevails. So far it has been a rolling disaster, but Russia accomplished its primary goals:
    – Nato is out of Ukraine and visibly scared to go too far in helping Kiev
    – the issue of treatment of the very large Russian minority is on the table – it can no longer be ignored as Europe ignored for the last 8 years, any settlement will address that.

    But it is ugly and I really wish it had not come to this. I don’t really like to predict – let’s leave that to the heavens – so any opinions are snapshots of what one sees at that given time. In retrospect we obviously see more. Blood will decide this – and it was as much the fault of Kiev, Nato, Brussels, London, and also MAGA that did exactly nothing to solve this situation peacefully. So have your MAGA, I wish them well, but in 2017-20 in Ukraine they failed.

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @Beckow


    In wars force prevails. So far it has been a rolling disaster, but Russia accomplished its primary goals:
    – Nato is out of Ukraine and visibly scared to go too far in helping Kiev
    – the issue of treatment of the very large Russian minority is on the table – it can no longer be ignored as Europe ignored for the last 8 years, any settlement will address that.
     
    NATO is out of Ukraine? Are you kidding? The formula has been NATO weaponry and technology and Ukrainian boots on the ground. It doesn't look to me that this formula is about to change.

    the issue of treatment of the very large Russian minority is on the table – it can no longer be ignored as Europe ignored for the last 8 years, any settlement will address that.
     
    That is if a large Russian and Russian speaking Ukrainian minority is left within Ukraine. A lot of these folks have taken up their suitcases and have left Ukraine. Notwithstanding the beautiful new condos in the "Garden by the Sea" in Mariupol that you've promised me, do you really think that many if any of these residents will return to their homes? And will this Russian speaking populace continue to be so supportive of Russia, especially when so much of the civilian infrastructure has been so maliciously targeted and raised to the ground by their Russian "brothers" just across the border? I seriously doubt it.
    , @A123
    @Beckow


    MAGA rule continued with all these policies, incl. Ukraine in Nato
     
    Do you have any evidence that President Trump was personally "all-in" on Ukraine? ... Didn't think so. You should phrase this as:

    Ukraine was a 3rd, possibly 4th, tier issue during Trump's 1st Term. The Deep State managed to continue trivial and unimportant policies that did not rise to the attention of the Commander In Chief.

    Remember a vast number of appointments were controlled by anti-MAGA establishment Republicans, notably Mitch McConnell. There were all sorts of opportunities to move small things through without reaching the President's desk.

    Due to the "Russia! Russia! Russia!" myth, domestic considerations resulted in the approval of an ~$280MM arms deal. The beneficiary was Ukraine, however the politics were all about Special Counsel Muller's bogus investigation.


    MAGA that did exactly nothing to solve this situation peacefully. So have your MAGA, I wish them well, but in 2017-20 in Ukraine they failed.
     
    During 2017-20, who knew in advance that Not-The-President Biden was going to become leader of a coup regime. It took puppets, Hunter (a.k.a. Burisma Biden) and the Big 10% Guy, to support the European WEF's war.

    Trump would not be a puppet for the Davos policy elites. At worst, Trump's 2nd term would have kept the status quo going for another 4 years. And,there would have been opportunities for improved Russia policies along the way.
    ___

    MAGA will be much more helpful after the midterms. U.S. funding for Kiev aggression will be cut. It is question of, "How much?" 75%+ seems highly likely.

    PEACE 😺

    Replies: @Beckow

    , @Mikel
    @Beckow


    To summarize what you say was a better option for Russia: Do nothing.
     
    Actually yes, doing nothing was a much better option than unleashing the bloodiest war in Europe since WWII that could lead us to WWIII. Incomparably better.

    But I didn't say 'do nothing'. I said change course to concentrate on internal development rather than trying to become a scary superpower and build good relations with neighbors and opponents while maintaining a very strong deterrence force. In the long run, it would have worked much better for Russia's security and the treatment of its co-ethnics abroad.

    The same thing that the US should do, btw. But we all know what happened to "MAGA". No need to revisit that sad episode.

    You are not addressing reality: Nato WAS in Ukraine, it was expanding, it was building bases
     
    I think I have addressed that head-on. Now NATO is in Ukraine in full force, killing Russian soldiers and generals and testing their weapon systems with Russians as real life targets and Ukrainians as expendable cannon fodder. On top of that, NATO has formally extended to two Russian neighbors and added hundreds of kms of direct borders with Russia. What a disastrous outcome for a military operation that hoped to keep NATO away from Russia.

    But perhaps the defense of Russian speakers in Ukraine has even gone worse. How many of the thousands of civilians, among them children, killed by Russian bombs in Mariupol and so many other Eastern Ukrainian cities, would have chosen that fate rather than continuing to belong to Ukraine? 1%? If killing such a large amount of innocent people is the only way you have to "liberate" them, you can stick your liberation up your aß, as far as I'm concerned. And this goes equally for Russia, Ukraine, the US, China or any other country, big or small.

    You say that wars are decided by the elites, not by common people, and that you don't really support this war but then go to extraordinary lengths to explain how Putin had "no choice" but start and maintain this bloodbath. It's not me you have to explain to that Ukraine and the West also have blood on their hands, including in this war, but there is a serious contradiction in your statements.

    Replies: @A123, @Beckow

  630. @Wokechoke
    @Beckow

    The general argument is that when Hitler rolled into Prague he was making a fool of Chamberlain and couldn't stick to a deal. Also that Danzig made it impossible for Poland to trade with the world from a real sea port so they were being turned into a landlocked rump.


    That's the main thing.


    But also for Chamberlain or Churchill later, Germany was fundamentally in a weak geographical position. We (British) could beat them with various European and international coalitions.


    I'm not sure Russia is so weak. It's got a lot of gifts and reserves unlike Germany which was a one hit wonder.

    Replies: @Beckow

    Agree with most of it, but what exactly was Chamberlain’s choice in Munich? If UK-France attacked Germany from the west they would get bogged down into an unpopular, bloody war while Germany would dismantle Czech resistance (the estimate is 2-3 months). Cities would be destroyed, tens of thousands would die. And UK and French people were not ready to fight another war.

    Additionally, as happened soon after, Poland and Hungary would attack Czecho-Slovakia to grab their claimed territories. Munich was a betrayal, but even betrayals happen for a reason. It just turned out later that the reason wasn’t very good or honorable.

  631. @sudden death
    @silviosilver


    Or maybe he’s not quite as caring or loving as we’ve been led to think. This is the hardest one to swallow, but the easiest to reconcile with our experience of existence.
     
    Very many people overall want to be cared or loved and it is incredibly hard to be living in a universe which does not care about them, so once again we have a very practical and useful cope of having some higher forces out there that do love or care. It is very natural feeling, which ofc has been and will be used, abused, exploited and amplified during the existence of humanity, but it is probably needed for many people to not go completely crazy and be capable of functioning, loving and caring human beings themselves while being self-aware and intelligent but mortal, relatively easily harmed and overall quite individually short-lived in grand scheme of things.

    Imho for some people the idea of cruel god(s) might be easier to swallow, than idea of no god(s)/higher forces and just absolute indifference towards them (no matter if in moments of happiness or suffering) in nature.

    Replies: @silviosilver

    Very many people overall want to be cared or loved and it is incredibly hard to be living in a universe which does not care about them, so once again we have a very practical and useful cope of having some higher forces out there that do love or care.

    Well sure. I’m not opposed to the idea myself. I am only challenging the version that has been presented to is, in which God is the most loving being imaginable. That belief gets people into all sorts of trouble, because inevitably something will happen which doesn’t seem all that “loving” or even “necessary” – the old why do bad things happen to good people conundrum.

    Now, if we simply allow that God is loving, but not always, and not always to the same degree, then we’re much less likely to feel let down by God. When various bad things happen to us, we’re more likely to look to ourselves for the cause, to draw upon our own resources to put things right, rather than shaking our fist at God. Resilient people have always done this, but even resilient people can feel crushed by life and lose their faith if something so bad happens that they start feeling that God isn’t “playing fair” and why believe in him anyway, it’s all just bullshit. But with relaxed assumptions about God’s maximal goodness, it’s easier to keep the faith, and perhaps easier to find it again if we do lose it.

    Imho for some people the idea of cruel god(s) might be easier to swallow, than idea of no god(s)/higher forces and just absolute indifference towards them (no matter if in moments of happiness or suffering) in nature.

    An indifferent God isn’t a bad deal. Maybe he doesn’t take any interest in our suffering but at least he exists, which leaves open the possibility that there’s “something” beyond our material existence – an afterlife, maybe, or a final spiritual experience that makes our expiration easy to take and which we don’t fear, maybe even gladly move towards (ie the opposite of our feelings about death, which perplexes and frightens us and which we do all we can to avoid).

  632. @Dmitry
    @silviosilver

    In the Bible, God has a very unambiguous answer for these questions.

    Although the answer, is including "don't ask these questions, human".

    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Job+38-42%3A6&version=AMP

    It's maybe psychologically healthy for the humans. "Don't ask questions".

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @silviosilver

    It’s maybe psychologically healthy for the humans. “Don’t ask questions”.

    Yeah, for some people that’s probably the best approach.

    It’s not for everyone though.

  633. @silviosilver
    @Bashibuzuk


    He has created a Universe (actually a Multiverse comprising possibly an infinite number of Universes) that allows his creatures an infinite potential of freedom and evolution.
     
    I'm not so sure. It seems to me there are plenty of things I do not have the "potential" to do - fly like a bird, swim like a fish, regenerate limbs. So my potential may be great, but it is surely something less than "infinite." (Or maybe you were being poetic?)

    Or to get at the same point a little differently, how do know that our abilities, as we understand them, allow for infinite freedom - or the maximal freedom possible in this universe? Can we ever really be sure of that? Or are we just jumping to that conclusion because we want to praise God and this sounds like the sort of thing that would please him?

    Because if it's not actually true that we enjoy the maximal amount of freedom possible, then it opens up the possibility that the degree of suffering could in fact have been set at a lower point than the level we know, and we wouldn't necessarily lose any freedom as a result. In other words, we could be just as we are, have the same potential we have, but the level of suffering in the universe could be, say, 50% lower.


    He has shown us the way that would be best for us to follow to evolve towards Him and as rapidly as possible shed as much imperfection (that you call sin) as possible.
     
    I didn't invent the concept of sin. That's been passed down to us by Christian thinkers. God hates sin, they say. Hates it so much that, if you sin, he wants you out of his sight. Worse, seemingly vindictively, he'll torture you for an eternity if you commit sin. That's how much he hates it. But then why create it If you hate peanut butter, would you make yourself a peanut butter sandwich, and then complain to everyone at work how much you hate your lunch? Is that smart?

    And if you know everything, and you create a creature that you know is going to sin and displease you - because that's the way you made it - shouldn't you blame yourself rather than your creation for acting the way it does? Sorry if that sounds snarky, but these are questions I've never managed to answer to my satisfaction (and my bar is set pretty low; anything halfway plausible would put me at ease, or at least that's what I think).

    It seems to me that most (even all) these difficulties could be avoided by relaxing our assumptions about God's omnipotence, omniscience or omnibenevolent. Say there's something that seems logically possible, but God can't do it. Would that really be the end of the world? Or what if God doesn't actually know the future. Maybe he can predict it scarily accurately, but - crucially - less than 100% accurately. Or maybe he could know it if he wanted to, but he chooses not to (for reasons of his own - but maybe something like if you're watching the replay of a sportsball match, it's less exciting if you already know the outcome). Or maybe he's not quite as caring or loving as we've been led to think. This is the hardest one to swallow, but the easiest to reconcile with our experience of existence.

    Replies: @sudden death, @Dmitry, @Coconuts

    Sorry if that sounds snarky, but these are questions I’ve never managed to answer to my satisfaction (and my bar is set pretty low; anything halfway plausible would put me at ease, or at least that’s what I think).

    Idk, in the New Atheist message board era you would often see people writing stuff like that. You never know it is just being said to draw people into discussion and to maximise rhetorical effect later when the sceptic rejects all the arguments they are presented with; ‘look how open minded and genuine I am, and these arguments still are unable to convince me… ‘ etc. This stuff may be just a flex, expression of will-to-power or something like that.

    Like here:

    I didn’t invent the concept of sin. That’s been passed down to us by Christian thinkers. God hates sin, they say. Hates it so much that, if you sin, he wants you out of his sight.

    Christianity has it that God decided to become a man and live with humans and be killed by them to rescue them from their sin, so in Christianity God’s views on it must not as clear as this.

    In the past study of theology didn’t happen until a student had studied philosophy first; most of the Catholic and Orthodox theologians writing on this topic are Platonists of one sort or another, most Anglo internet agnostics seem to be default empiricists and utilitarians or pragmatists. Imo Empiricists and Platonists will often talk past each other if they are not aware of some of the assumptions they are bringing to the discussion.

    [MORE]

    And if you know everything, and you create a creature that you know is going to sin and displease you – because that’s the way you made it – shouldn’t you blame yourself rather than your creation for acting the way it does?

    Say sin is a type of privation or absence of something, and being a creation also inherently involves privation or absence of something (it involves lacking non-contingent existence and being less than infinitely perfect), the existence of creation is inherently linked to the existence of something like sin. Sin would be a sub type of privation or imperfection specific to humans and other created entities with a certain level of freedom and control over their own behaviour.

    The question about sin becomes a variant of ‘why does anything created or contingent exist?’

  634. @Emil Nikola Richard
    @songbird

    A bunch of these 1% er fems use surrogate mothers to carry and nurse their offspring as they don't have the will to perform the work themselves and they have the money to burn. I wonder how old the kids are when mommy comes clean about their origin.

    It sure was funny this morning when four separate stories showed up in newlinks at the same time. The best one I saw had a Hillary Clinton tweet about how only a deplorable could even think of doing this. To be fair we don't actually know what happened. The thing is even though it might not be the absolute worst it is a safe bet it's pretty bad.

    Replies: @songbird

    Would be pretty gnarly if the woman that the media are always routing as a grandmother had all of her children born using Amazonian tribeswomen surrogates, like in “The Boys from Brazil.”

  635. @Bashibuzuk
    @Coconuts

    God in my opinion must be seen as an Absolute transcending all limitations and categorizations.

    Even the sentence that I have just written is a somewhat absurd limitation that makes discussing God pointless.

    Even using the word God is limiting in a certain way.

    In early Christian thought this has been discussed by Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite.

    There can be no unambiguous epistemology of Godhood.

    That is why Zen / Ch'an practitioners are right about "words having no meaning" when we are trying to approach Reality in and of itself.

    In Sufi though an emphasis is made on the Islamic concept of God's immanence, it is said that God is closer to human beings than their own jugular vein. It is also often said that "there are two steps to the door of the Friend, you are stepping with the first step". That is, if something thinks of God, then he has already made half the walk to be in his Presence.

    In Hindu thought, the Advaita insists upon the Oneness of God's being and his Creation. There is no room in the Creation for God's absence.

    Of course, this is all a lot of human concepts.

    We don’t really need them to become a better person and we might get lost playing with great words instead of doing the good works.

    All Belief Systems are always subjective.

    There is no objective Belief, only Knowledge could perhaps be objective.

    Therefore I stop posting about all of this.

    🙂

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @Coconuts

    Even using the word God is limiting in a certain way.

    In early Christian thought this has been discussed by Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite.

    It is interesting that he has always been very influential in the East, then when he was rediscovered in the West he became very influential as well. Afaik the idea of Kataphatic and Apophatic theology came from this tradition. St. Thomas dealt with talking positively about God in his famous analogy of being idea, where certain things can be said about God in human language by analogy but nothing can be said about him univocally.

    I understood it as drawing attention to the importance of religious practice if a person is seeking to understand God, as propositional knowledge of the normal kind is limited in how far it can go.

    In Sufi though an emphasis is made on the Islamic concept of God’s immanence, it is said that God is closer to human beings than their own jugular vein.

    I can understand this, many of the traditional arguments for God end up pointing to similar things about his relationship to creation.

  636. I came across this in a book by Drieu La Rochelle the other day. Drieu was obviously a Fascist and Nietzschean and expresses things in colourful terms, but it seems interesting in relation to the discussion that has been going on in this thread:

    “When society moves away from war, all passion and especially all love soon dies. What kind of lover is it who is no longer capable of killing a rival or who no longer runs the risk of being killed in turn? What kind of man is no stronger than a woman, whom experience is not destined to test more harshly? How can a woman tolerate the pain of childbirth if her husband will not run the risk of combat?

    When man is no longer occupied by war he spends too much time making love, he becomes tired and passive. Introverted with women, he might just as well be the same with other men. And women making love to men might just as well make love to other women.

    [MORE]

    If a man will no longer risk his life in combat, soon he will no longer risk it by paternity. Because fathering a child is a kind of half-death, sacrificing part of a man’s self and permanently mutilating his egotism. Rousseau understood it clearly, one of the foremost egoists, he put his children in an orphanage.

    From the moment man is no longer prepared to put his life at risk, he is no longer capable of believing in the gods, because they represent the sentiment of live confronting death and overcoming it. When man loses the sense of glory he loses the sense of immortality and as he loses the sense of immortality, he loses that of divinity.

    If divinity dies, nature withers and what is human imperceptibly begins to perish, becoming narrow and fastidious.”

  637. @Beckow
    @Mikel

    To summarize what you say was a better option for Russia: Do nothing.

    Oh, and open more MacDonalds and quietly hope that Ukraine won't be in Nato in 2023, but only in 2025, or even 2030.


    Ukraine possibly joining NATO and oppressing the Russian language
     
    You are not addressing reality: Nato WAS in Ukraine, it was expanding, it was building bases - 'joint and temporary', but in reality Nato bases - the fig leave of postponing formal membership wouldn't fool a monkey, why do you hide behind 'possibly'?

    MAGA rule continued with all these policies, incl. Ukraine in Nato. Electing Zelensky by 70% to have peace and equal rights for Russians reversed with speed not seen since De Gaulle pulled out of Algeria. You ignore all of that to talk about some ideals, peace, non-intervention, etc...well, there was a de facto state of war on Russian-Ukie border since 2014. It was escalating, Kiev and the West were raising the stakes.

    I never support any wars because wars are the worst context for conscience and rationality. But to unilaterally blame only Russia for this war is a lie: they were very seriously and forcefully challenged on their own borders and within their own Russian-speaking community. It is incomprehensible that you would claim that other nations would put up with it. And the best analogy is US - Russia and US are roughly comparable. If one can, so can the other.

    In wars force prevails. So far it has been a rolling disaster, but Russia accomplished its primary goals:
    - Nato is out of Ukraine and visibly scared to go too far in helping Kiev
    - the issue of treatment of the very large Russian minority is on the table - it can no longer be ignored as Europe ignored for the last 8 years, any settlement will address that.

    But it is ugly and I really wish it had not come to this. I don't really like to predict - let's leave that to the heavens - so any opinions are snapshots of what one sees at that given time. In retrospect we obviously see more. Blood will decide this - and it was as much the fault of Kiev, Nato, Brussels, London, and also MAGA that did exactly nothing to solve this situation peacefully. So have your MAGA, I wish them well, but in 2017-20 in Ukraine they failed.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @A123, @Mikel

    In wars force prevails. So far it has been a rolling disaster, but Russia accomplished its primary goals:
    – Nato is out of Ukraine and visibly scared to go too far in helping Kiev
    – the issue of treatment of the very large Russian minority is on the table – it can no longer be ignored as Europe ignored for the last 8 years, any settlement will address that.

    NATO is out of Ukraine? Are you kidding? The formula has been NATO weaponry and technology and Ukrainian boots on the ground. It doesn’t look to me that this formula is about to change.

    the issue of treatment of the very large Russian minority is on the table – it can no longer be ignored as Europe ignored for the last 8 years, any settlement will address that.

    That is if a large Russian and Russian speaking Ukrainian minority is left within Ukraine. A lot of these folks have taken up their suitcases and have left Ukraine. Notwithstanding the beautiful new condos in the “Garden by the Sea” in Mariupol that you’ve promised me, do you really think that many if any of these residents will return to their homes? And will this Russian speaking populace continue to be so supportive of Russia, especially when so much of the civilian infrastructure has been so maliciously targeted and raised to the ground by their Russian “brothers” just across the border? I seriously doubt it.

  638. Bashibuzuk says:
    @LatW
    @Bashibuzuk


    https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/18485609
     


    This was quite an explosive book. A friend of mine in Russia sent me a copy back in the day (the one with the dark red cover, still have it somewhere on the bookshelf). A few years after he sent it, it was banned. Interesting book (although it takes it a bit too far), interesting how it was possible for this type of literature to float around for a good decade.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

    There were even more hard-core books published back in the day. But the authors of these books did not understand in what world we are living. They actually do not go far enough in their thinking.

    Having discovered the antisemitic (judophobic to be more precise) angle, they seldom make the next step and ask “how did we get there?”. For those who do (who are few and far between, Kevin McDonald being one among them, Igor’ Shafarevich – another, Laurent Guyenot on this site is also one of them) the analysis becomes more historical and sociological and yields some interesting results. But this is also an intermediate level. Questions about “how does it get to this historical and social organization?” remain. Shafarevich named one of his books “A three thousand years enigma”. The “enigmatic” part remains.

    It remains because it is outside the scope of rational and materialist academic analysis and outside of our current tradition of thinking, believing and behaving. The questions asked by the most intelligent among these authors cannot be correctly answered by using our usual intellectual approach. And of course anger and violent exaltation do not lead to the right answers either. They would just lead to suffering of mostly innocent human beings. It happened before and did solve nothing, actually just making the situation worse.

    [MORE]

    One has to often go back to the beginnings of the pathology to find the real causative agent, the symptoms and morbid alterations experienced by the patient after years of chronic disease are sometimes not informative enough to pinpoint the real pathogen behind the pathological process. Think of Lyme disease, advanced syphilis or HIV for that matter. Or cancers that might be caused by viruses contracted years ago and gone completely asymptomatic and unnoticed.

    Our whole civilization is affected with a complex disease. Some would say that it is just the reflection of human nature. But humans are social and spiritual animals, their true nature is conditioned by society and spiritually altered by belief systems. Humans are clever monkeys that are capable of metaphysics. Why are we capable of, and sometimes feel the urge of finding meaning behind and beyond the physical realm? That should be the question.

    Because different human primate tribes find different metaphysical answers to their questions. Some of these answers are probably more aligned with the way our Reality functions on a pragmatic level but they end up causing more trouble and suffering than the answers which really aim it for the crux of the matter, the inner core of human nature. One cannot feed oneself with Archetypes, but one becomes spiritually degraded without them and ends up a slave to those who kept the Spiritual Attractors of their ancestors “well fed” and “energized”. And those who happen to embody a more aggressive Archetype, bent on expansion and domination become the catalysts of Apocalyptic change (“дрожжи революции”) that is the Progress leading to our potential dehumanization and outright destruction as a species.

    That is something the young people who have composed the song below might have understood on an intuitive level. They’re up to something here. 988 is the officially recognized date of the Baptism of the Rus, it is of course an historical approximation. Abrahamic religious movements / belief systems arrived to what is now Russia/Ukraine/Belarus earlier and completely triumphed much later. There were still pagans in fifteenth century and “native” Russian Orthodoxy got strongly tainted with pagan psychology, hence the “need” to “rectify” the whole thing during the Raskol.

    And Dmitry is absolutely right, one uses a software which characteristics one does not understand at one’s own perils. Sometimes one needs to reset the whole system and purge the malware from the hardware to get the things right.

    Anyways, today is the Feast of the Ancestors, we shall direct our memories and our love towards those who made our existence possible through their own lives, suffering and sacrifice.

    С праздником брат!

    • Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Bashibuzuk


    Anyways, today is the Feast of the Ancestors, we shall direct our memories and our love towards those who made our existence possible through their own lives, suffering and sacrifice.

     

    Randall Carlson has a new show where he says Halloween / All Saints is worldwide, precedes written records, and has its beginnings in the great comet (asteroid?) catastrophe of ~ 15000 years ago. He says nobody in America has a proper religious celebration anymore but he is wrong. In New Orleans this is the day they put a fresh white wash on the family tomb and have a picnic at the cemetery.

    https://nolacatholiccemeteries.org/photoalbums/st-roch-cemetery/20170414_StRochCemetery1and2_IMG_7268.jpg

    https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0045/5865/1465/products/sforza6_360x.jpg
    , @Mr. Hack
    @Bashibuzuk


    Our whole civilization is affected with a complex disease. Some would say that it is just the reflection of human nature. But humans are social and spiritual animals, their true nature is conditioned by society and spiritually altered by belief systems. Humans are clever monkeys that are capable of metaphysics. Why are we capable of, and sometimes feel the urge of finding meaning behind and beyond the physical realm? That should be the question.
     
    It is the question, and can only be answered through the precepts of Theosis:

    Theosis – for man to be united with God, not in an external or a sentimental manner but ontologically, in a real way. Man is placed so high in Orthodox anthropology that if we compare that with the anthropologies of all the philosophies or social and psychological systems we will very easily find out how poor these are, how little they correspond to man’s great yearning for something very great and true in his life. Since man is “called to be a god” (i.e. was created to become a god), as long as he does not find himself on the path of Theosis he feels an emptiness within himself... he feels that something is not going right, so he is not joyful even when he is trying to cover the emptiness with other activities. He may numb himself, create a glamorous world, or cage and imprison himself within this world, yet at the same time he remains poor, small, limited. He may organise his life in such a way that he is almost never at peace, never alone with himself. Surrounded by noise, tension, television, radio, continuous information about this and that, he may seek to forget with drugs; not to think, not to worry, not to remember that he is on the wrong path and has strayed from his purpose... If man did not have the image of God in himself, he would not be able to seek its prototype. Each of us is an image of God, and God is our prototype. The image seeks the prototype, and only when it finds it does it find rest.
     
    http://orthodoxinfo.com/general/theosis-english.pdf
    , @LatW
    @Bashibuzuk


    There were even more hard-core books published back in the day.
     
    Yes, the book is in line with the open spirit of those days. But I suspect that this kind of a book can easily be used to stifle other, less militant, but still important books.


    I do appreciate its tone, but, tbh, I wasn't really looking for that type of book (my friend just threw it in as a present along with the Темнозорь album, lol). The list of the banned literature is quite long now (with several what look like язычник books, of course).

    They actually do not go far enough in their thinking. For those who do (who are few and far between, [..] the analysis becomes more historical and sociological and yields some interesting results.
     
    We have a book like this, too, written in the 1920s, called "The thousand year long combatting of our ancestral faith", combatting as in "attempt at eradication", better translated into Russian, actually, as "Тысячелетнее подавление нашего божественности " (we call it богадержания - a word I just invented, it's what we call our faith in modern times - мы держим, храним с собой Бога, богов). It is much milder than Istarkov's book, but with similar themes (and more focused on Sanskrit). Needless to say, the Bolshevik tried to destroy this book, but didn't succeed.

    The “enigmatic” part remains.
     
    There might be some very basic things at play, such as that an organism that grows in a desert will most likely be different from an organism that grows in the forest or in some colder climes. Those are just traits. The key is to circumscribe and keep proper boundaries. Both physical and mental. Not to mention political. Sorry, if this seems like a simplistic outlook.

    Or cancers that might be caused by viruses contracted years ago and gone completely asymptomatic and unnoticed.
     
    Those are incurable. A good comparison, because one doesn't notice until it's late. Remember that these also have to do with immunity. One might want to think about how to keep their immunity strong. Also, children don't have to be exposed to them. The children are ours, not theirs.

    Our whole civilization is affected with a complex disease.
     
    Which civilization would that be? The human civilization or Western civilization in particular? I'm not really predisposed to such a gloomy, deterministic outlook (even if one might think of it descriptively that way from a certain perspective). Regardless of the culture or civilization that a certain mind is born into, the mind is powerful enough to seek light, the mind is free (it exists beyond a certain culture or religion), even if the mind is lackadaisical, life will bring pain / suffering/ experience or other types of inspiration (such as epiphanies) and through this experience the mind / the soul will be moved towards advancing or opening. As the mind matures, grows stronger through processing this suffering, so it becomes more resourceful, agile. Maybe, wise?

    And those who happen to embody a more aggressive Archetype, bent on expansion and domination become the catalysts of Apocalyptic change (“дрожжи революции”) that is the Progress leading to our potential dehumanization and outright destruction as a species.
     
    I understand why you feel compelled to bring that up, given current times. I kind of tend to view the archetypes in a similar way that Joseph Campbell does (in The Hero with a Thousand Faces) not so much as competing, but just separate archetypes that show up through various narratives. As a reference to something that was before, the monomyth, that can be replicated over and over, in different spaces and times, but always reverts to the same beginning (original concept). But I'm assuming you meant that there could be certain forces that use an archetype in an aggressive or overexposed way to achieve certain goals.

    988 is the officially recognized date of the Baptism of the Rus, it is of course an historical approximation.
     
    It's good that they reference this number, it is definitely meaningful. In my community we don't reference such dates (except for basic historical events) because we don't recognize or accept this. We keep following that which is timeless. I view it very dryly these days, as certain historical events that we were subjected to, but that doesn't interfere with the continuity. I know it is naive and completely larp-y, but it doesn't bother me. 😊

    I like that song by Srub, right on, very good lyrics "Забытый голос всего лесного" - very accurate. Except not forgotten! Not forgotten. And I really like that part "матерей стонами, детскими криками", it gives the mental connection with the ancestors and the kind of, hopefully, never ending timeline that we have experienced together.

    The video is controversial though (I know what they mean with the churches but I wouldn't want to associate my tradition with that), basically, it is similar to what Istarkov wrote. First they displaced the ancient faith, then they were themselves displaced by the Bolshevik, and then the communist spawn ate the original communists (in the late 80s and early 90s), it's a cycle, where the spawn devours its originator. A cycle of destruction.

    I noticed the young Russian ethnonats play this song, too. Btw, these are not new themes, there have been other musicians who have tackled this, with the central theme revolving around "the lie". Or on the other hand - "rebirth". Maybe in a more simple, less esoteric, way than this piece, but it's been around.

    С праздником
     
    In my tradition, the whole month of October (and beyond) is the time of remembrance and should be reserved for deep reflection and mediation, in fact, it lasts all the way until the Solstice. It is a dark period, but the Sun will be returning soon. This year it is not much of a праздник given what is going on, especially in the area around Dnipro (which is our ancestral abode, whence we came). Those who are laying there right now deserve a ritual and a blessing. Dnipro is indeed a river of souls now...

    The river of Veles overfloweth, spilling over its banks.
    Thou shall remain on the other side.
    We shall remain on this side.

    Replies: @LatW

  639. @Bashibuzuk
    @LatW

    There were even more hard-core books published back in the day. But the authors of these books did not understand in what world we are living. They actually do not go far enough in their thinking.

    Having discovered the antisemitic (judophobic to be more precise) angle, they seldom make the next step and ask "how did we get there?". For those who do (who are few and far between, Kevin McDonald being one among them, Igor' Shafarevich - another, Laurent Guyenot on this site is also one of them) the analysis becomes more historical and sociological and yields some interesting results. But this is also an intermediate level. Questions about "how does it get to this historical and social organization?" remain. Shafarevich named one of his books "A three thousand years enigma". The "enigmatic" part remains.

    It remains because it is outside the scope of rational and materialist academic analysis and outside of our current tradition of thinking, believing and behaving. The questions asked by the most intelligent among these authors cannot be correctly answered by using our usual intellectual approach. And of course anger and violent exaltation do not lead to the right answers either. They would just lead to suffering of mostly innocent human beings. It happened before and did solve nothing, actually just making the situation worse.

    One has to often go back to the beginnings of the pathology to find the real causative agent, the symptoms and morbid alterations experienced by the patient after years of chronic disease are sometimes not informative enough to pinpoint the real pathogen behind the pathological process. Think of Lyme disease, advanced syphilis or HIV for that matter. Or cancers that might be caused by viruses contracted years ago and gone completely asymptomatic and unnoticed.

    Our whole civilization is affected with a complex disease. Some would say that it is just the reflection of human nature. But humans are social and spiritual animals, their true nature is conditioned by society and spiritually altered by belief systems. Humans are clever monkeys that are capable of metaphysics. Why are we capable of, and sometimes feel the urge of finding meaning behind and beyond the physical realm? That should be the question.

    Because different human primate tribes find different metaphysical answers to their questions. Some of these answers are probably more aligned with the way our Reality functions on a pragmatic level but they end up causing more trouble and suffering than the answers which really aim it for the crux of the matter, the inner core of human nature. One cannot feed oneself with Archetypes, but one becomes spiritually degraded without them and ends up a slave to those who kept the Spiritual Attractors of their ancestors "well fed" and "energized". And those who happen to embody a more aggressive Archetype, bent on expansion and domination become the catalysts of Apocalyptic change ("дрожжи революции") that is the Progress leading to our potential dehumanization and outright destruction as a species.

    That is something the young people who have composed the song below might have understood on an intuitive level. They're up to something here. 988 is the officially recognized date of the Baptism of the Rus, it is of course an historical approximation. Abrahamic religious movements / belief systems arrived to what is now Russia/Ukraine/Belarus earlier and completely triumphed much later. There were still pagans in fifteenth century and "native" Russian Orthodoxy got strongly tainted with pagan psychology, hence the "need" to "rectify" the whole thing during the Raskol.

    https://youtu.be/P8SAtQ4e7Dg

    And Dmitry is absolutely right, one uses a software which characteristics one does not understand at one's own perils. Sometimes one needs to reset the whole system and purge the malware from the hardware to get the things right.

    Anyways, today is the Feast of the Ancestors, we shall direct our memories and our love towards those who made our existence possible through their own lives, suffering and sacrifice.

    С праздником брат!

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Mr. Hack, @LatW

    Anyways, today is the Feast of the Ancestors, we shall direct our memories and our love towards those who made our existence possible through their own lives, suffering and sacrifice.

    Randall Carlson has a new show where he says Halloween / All Saints is worldwide, precedes written records, and has its beginnings in the great comet (asteroid?) catastrophe of ~ 15000 years ago. He says nobody in America has a proper religious celebration anymore but he is wrong. In New Orleans this is the day they put a fresh white wash on the family tomb and have a picnic at the cemetery.

  640. @Beckow
    @Mikel

    To summarize what you say was a better option for Russia: Do nothing.

    Oh, and open more MacDonalds and quietly hope that Ukraine won't be in Nato in 2023, but only in 2025, or even 2030.


    Ukraine possibly joining NATO and oppressing the Russian language
     
    You are not addressing reality: Nato WAS in Ukraine, it was expanding, it was building bases - 'joint and temporary', but in reality Nato bases - the fig leave of postponing formal membership wouldn't fool a monkey, why do you hide behind 'possibly'?

    MAGA rule continued with all these policies, incl. Ukraine in Nato. Electing Zelensky by 70% to have peace and equal rights for Russians reversed with speed not seen since De Gaulle pulled out of Algeria. You ignore all of that to talk about some ideals, peace, non-intervention, etc...well, there was a de facto state of war on Russian-Ukie border since 2014. It was escalating, Kiev and the West were raising the stakes.

    I never support any wars because wars are the worst context for conscience and rationality. But to unilaterally blame only Russia for this war is a lie: they were very seriously and forcefully challenged on their own borders and within their own Russian-speaking community. It is incomprehensible that you would claim that other nations would put up with it. And the best analogy is US - Russia and US are roughly comparable. If one can, so can the other.

    In wars force prevails. So far it has been a rolling disaster, but Russia accomplished its primary goals:
    - Nato is out of Ukraine and visibly scared to go too far in helping Kiev
    - the issue of treatment of the very large Russian minority is on the table - it can no longer be ignored as Europe ignored for the last 8 years, any settlement will address that.

    But it is ugly and I really wish it had not come to this. I don't really like to predict - let's leave that to the heavens - so any opinions are snapshots of what one sees at that given time. In retrospect we obviously see more. Blood will decide this - and it was as much the fault of Kiev, Nato, Brussels, London, and also MAGA that did exactly nothing to solve this situation peacefully. So have your MAGA, I wish them well, but in 2017-20 in Ukraine they failed.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @A123, @Mikel

    MAGA rule continued with all these policies, incl. Ukraine in Nato

    Do you have any evidence that President Trump was personally “all-in” on Ukraine? … Didn’t think so. You should phrase this as:

    Ukraine was a 3rd, possibly 4th, tier issue during Trump’s 1st Term. The Deep State managed to continue trivial and unimportant policies that did not rise to the attention of the Commander In Chief.

    Remember a vast number of appointments were controlled by anti-MAGA establishment Republicans, notably Mitch McConnell. There were all sorts of opportunities to move small things through without reaching the President’s desk.

    Due to the “Russia! Russia! Russia!” myth, domestic considerations resulted in the approval of an ~$280MM arms deal. The beneficiary was Ukraine, however the politics were all about Special Counsel Muller’s bogus investigation.

    MAGA that did exactly nothing to solve this situation peacefully. So have your MAGA, I wish them well, but in 2017-20 in Ukraine they failed.

    During 2017-20, who knew in advance that Not-The-President Biden was going to become leader of a coup regime. It took puppets, Hunter (a.k.a. Burisma Biden) and the Big 10% Guy, to support the European WEF’s war.

    Trump would not be a puppet for the Davos policy elites. At worst, Trump’s 2nd term would have kept the status quo going for another 4 years. And,there would have been opportunities for improved Russia policies along the way.
    ___

    MAGA will be much more helpful after the midterms. U.S. funding for Kiev aggression will be cut. It is question of, “How much?” 75%+ seems highly likely.

    PEACE 😺

    • Replies: @Beckow
    @A123

    What do you mean by 'evidence'? The policy didn't change: blocking the Minsk deal, arming Kiev. It led directly to the war - for 4 years of MAGA the lib-dem interventionist policy continued. It matters very little if it was intentional or out of Trump's weakness.

    I agree to one thing: if Trump was in power when the war actually started he would most likely kept the insane escalation under control. But while in power Trump had an opportunity to force a settlement and he didn't. Maybe he was kept from doing it, but what does that really matter?

    Replies: @A123

  641. @Bashibuzuk
    @LatW

    There were even more hard-core books published back in the day. But the authors of these books did not understand in what world we are living. They actually do not go far enough in their thinking.

    Having discovered the antisemitic (judophobic to be more precise) angle, they seldom make the next step and ask "how did we get there?". For those who do (who are few and far between, Kevin McDonald being one among them, Igor' Shafarevich - another, Laurent Guyenot on this site is also one of them) the analysis becomes more historical and sociological and yields some interesting results. But this is also an intermediate level. Questions about "how does it get to this historical and social organization?" remain. Shafarevich named one of his books "A three thousand years enigma". The "enigmatic" part remains.

    It remains because it is outside the scope of rational and materialist academic analysis and outside of our current tradition of thinking, believing and behaving. The questions asked by the most intelligent among these authors cannot be correctly answered by using our usual intellectual approach. And of course anger and violent exaltation do not lead to the right answers either. They would just lead to suffering of mostly innocent human beings. It happened before and did solve nothing, actually just making the situation worse.

    One has to often go back to the beginnings of the pathology to find the real causative agent, the symptoms and morbid alterations experienced by the patient after years of chronic disease are sometimes not informative enough to pinpoint the real pathogen behind the pathological process. Think of Lyme disease, advanced syphilis or HIV for that matter. Or cancers that might be caused by viruses contracted years ago and gone completely asymptomatic and unnoticed.

    Our whole civilization is affected with a complex disease. Some would say that it is just the reflection of human nature. But humans are social and spiritual animals, their true nature is conditioned by society and spiritually altered by belief systems. Humans are clever monkeys that are capable of metaphysics. Why are we capable of, and sometimes feel the urge of finding meaning behind and beyond the physical realm? That should be the question.

    Because different human primate tribes find different metaphysical answers to their questions. Some of these answers are probably more aligned with the way our Reality functions on a pragmatic level but they end up causing more trouble and suffering than the answers which really aim it for the crux of the matter, the inner core of human nature. One cannot feed oneself with Archetypes, but one becomes spiritually degraded without them and ends up a slave to those who kept the Spiritual Attractors of their ancestors "well fed" and "energized". And those who happen to embody a more aggressive Archetype, bent on expansion and domination become the catalysts of Apocalyptic change ("дрожжи революции") that is the Progress leading to our potential dehumanization and outright destruction as a species.

    That is something the young people who have composed the song below might have understood on an intuitive level. They're up to something here. 988 is the officially recognized date of the Baptism of the Rus, it is of course an historical approximation. Abrahamic religious movements / belief systems arrived to what is now Russia/Ukraine/Belarus earlier and completely triumphed much later. There were still pagans in fifteenth century and "native" Russian Orthodoxy got strongly tainted with pagan psychology, hence the "need" to "rectify" the whole thing during the Raskol.

    https://youtu.be/P8SAtQ4e7Dg

    And Dmitry is absolutely right, one uses a software which characteristics one does not understand at one's own perils. Sometimes one needs to reset the whole system and purge the malware from the hardware to get the things right.

    Anyways, today is the Feast of the Ancestors, we shall direct our memories and our love towards those who made our existence possible through their own lives, suffering and sacrifice.

    С праздником брат!

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Mr. Hack, @LatW

    Our whole civilization is affected with a complex disease. Some would say that it is just the reflection of human nature. But humans are social and spiritual animals, their true nature is conditioned by society and spiritually altered by belief systems. Humans are clever monkeys that are capable of metaphysics. Why are we capable of, and sometimes feel the urge of finding meaning behind and beyond the physical realm? That should be the question.

    It is the question, and can only be answered through the precepts of Theosis:

    Theosis – for man to be united with God, not in an external or a sentimental manner but ontologically, in a real way. Man is placed so high in Orthodox anthropology that if we compare that with the anthropologies of all the philosophies or social and psychological systems we will very easily find out how poor these are, how little they correspond to man’s great yearning for something very great and true in his life. Since man is “called to be a god” (i.e. was created to become a god), as long as he does not find himself on the path of Theosis he feels an emptiness within himself… he feels that something is not going right, so he is not joyful even when he is trying to cover the emptiness with other activities. He may numb himself, create a glamorous world, or cage and imprison himself within this world, yet at the same time he remains poor, small, limited. He may organise his life in such a way that he is almost never at peace, never alone with himself. Surrounded by noise, tension, television, radio, continuous information about this and that, he may seek to forget with drugs; not to think, not to worry, not to remember that he is on the wrong path and has strayed from his purpose… If man did not have the image of God in himself, he would not be able to seek its prototype. Each of us is an image of God, and God is our prototype. The image seeks the prototype, and only when it finds it does it find rest.

    http://orthodoxinfo.com/general/theosis-english.pdf

  642. …NATO weaponry and technology and Ukrainian boots on the ground.

    So? Who cares about that? The threat was Nato in Ukraine with bases and missiles placed close to Russia (of course, “defensive” missiles). And a formal arrangement between Kiev and Nato. That is not going to happen, it was killed by Russia in the first 24 hrs of this war. Why do you think the West is so hysterical? They know that they are out. And they really, really wanted in. So send more “weapons” – for free – make sure more Ukies die, none of it fixes the problem for Nato: they can no longer absorb Ukraine as a member and start playing pressure games from there on Russia.

    if a large Russian and Russian speaking Ukrainian minority is left within Ukraine.

    Of course they will be, Mariupol is being rebuilt, they will control the land. It is a good land, with seashore, resources, etc… I would worry more about the 5-6 million Ukies who left, how many are coming back? I read that just Canada is close to processing 1 million Ukie visas. You keep on looking at the other side and always forget the real disaster is happening to the rump Ukraine run out if Kiev.

    Regarding sympathies, let’s just wait. Based on history, the winner gets the sympathy. I think it will happen in this case too.

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @Beckow


    Based on history, the winner gets the sympathy. I think it will happen in this case too.
     
    Based on papers and videos put out by the economist Inozemtsev, it doesn't appear that Russia is slated to become any sort of a winner as a result of this war. I know that you have an extensive knowledge of economics, and was dismayed when you never took up the call to discus this guy and his prognostications. I've already posted the clip above twice. He is a highly illuminated Russian economist, always swaying near the top branches of power?.....

    Replies: @Beckow

  643. @A123
    @Beckow


    MAGA rule continued with all these policies, incl. Ukraine in Nato
     
    Do you have any evidence that President Trump was personally "all-in" on Ukraine? ... Didn't think so. You should phrase this as:

    Ukraine was a 3rd, possibly 4th, tier issue during Trump's 1st Term. The Deep State managed to continue trivial and unimportant policies that did not rise to the attention of the Commander In Chief.

    Remember a vast number of appointments were controlled by anti-MAGA establishment Republicans, notably Mitch McConnell. There were all sorts of opportunities to move small things through without reaching the President's desk.

    Due to the "Russia! Russia! Russia!" myth, domestic considerations resulted in the approval of an ~$280MM arms deal. The beneficiary was Ukraine, however the politics were all about Special Counsel Muller's bogus investigation.


    MAGA that did exactly nothing to solve this situation peacefully. So have your MAGA, I wish them well, but in 2017-20 in Ukraine they failed.
     
    During 2017-20, who knew in advance that Not-The-President Biden was going to become leader of a coup regime. It took puppets, Hunter (a.k.a. Burisma Biden) and the Big 10% Guy, to support the European WEF's war.

    Trump would not be a puppet for the Davos policy elites. At worst, Trump's 2nd term would have kept the status quo going for another 4 years. And,there would have been opportunities for improved Russia policies along the way.
    ___

    MAGA will be much more helpful after the midterms. U.S. funding for Kiev aggression will be cut. It is question of, "How much?" 75%+ seems highly likely.

    PEACE 😺

    Replies: @Beckow

    What do you mean by ‘evidence’? The policy didn’t change: blocking the Minsk deal, arming Kiev. It led directly to the war – for 4 years of MAGA the lib-dem interventionist policy continued. It matters very little if it was intentional or out of Trump’s weakness.

    I agree to one thing: if Trump was in power when the war actually started he would most likely kept the insane escalation under control. But while in power Trump had an opportunity to force a settlement and he didn’t. Maybe he was kept from doing it, but what does that really matter?

    • Replies: @A123
    @Beckow




    MAGA rule continued with all these policies, incl. Ukraine in Nato
     
    Do you have any evidence that President Trump was personally “all-in” on Ukraine?
     
    What do you mean by ‘evidence’? The policy didn’t change
     
    Do you have any evidence that this issue had large amounts of Presidential focus?

    And, after deep introspection Trump chose this policy as a critical top foreign policy priority?

    blocking the Minsk deal
     
    When did Trump personally speak out against the Minsk deal? I do not recall that ever happening.

    Can you provide a citation specific to Trump (not a McConnell servitor)?

    out of Trump’s weakness.
     
    ♣ Is Usain Bolt weak/slow?
    ♣ How effective/fast would Usain Bolt run with 100 lbs chained to each leg?

    The ability of Bolt to proceed quickly in the latter case is not about him being "weak". It is about conditions beyond his control. Conflating "weakness" with "impossible circumstances" is faulty logic.
    ____

    How much can one President do while being undermined by by the SJW Globalist Deep State? Do you believe:

    • Trump had unlimited power?
    • Trump unlimited scope of action?
    • Trump intentionally chose Ukraine policy as a foreign policy priority?

    None of these things are accurate. Reality shows that the U.S. Presidency as an office, when not supported by the Legislature or Judiciary, is limited.

    ♦ Ukraine was a contained, low priority issue that was not going anywhere.
    ♦ 1st/2nd Tier domestic issues such as the Mueller witch hunt took priority.

    Your complaint is "An impossible thing did not happen!" I hate to break it to you, but impossible things never happen.

    Thus, again, the correct way to phrase your objection is:

    "Ukraine was a 3rd, possibly 4th, tier issue during Trump’s 1st Term. The Deep State managed to continue trivial and unimportant policies that did not rise to the attention of the Commander In Chief."
     
    There was lots of leftover mischief from prior administrations that Trump was unable to fix. In part due to Deep State, establishment resistance. If you insist on assigning blame, do it accurately. The SJW Globalist policy you are complaining about is an Obama, or possibly GW Bush, initiative.
    ___

    The first chance at a real MAGA administration is after the 2024 election. And, even then there will be limits, as it is unlikely to feature a fully MAGA Senate.

    PEACE 😇
  644. @Beckow

    ...NATO weaponry and technology and Ukrainian boots on the ground.
     
    So? Who cares about that? The threat was Nato in Ukraine with bases and missiles placed close to Russia (of course, "defensive" missiles). And a formal arrangement between Kiev and Nato. That is not going to happen, it was killed by Russia in the first 24 hrs of this war. Why do you think the West is so hysterical? They know that they are out. And they really, really wanted in. So send more "weapons" - for free - make sure more Ukies die, none of it fixes the problem for Nato: they can no longer absorb Ukraine as a member and start playing pressure games from there on Russia.

    if a large Russian and Russian speaking Ukrainian minority is left within Ukraine.
     
    Of course they will be, Mariupol is being rebuilt, they will control the land. It is a good land, with seashore, resources, etc... I would worry more about the 5-6 million Ukies who left, how many are coming back? I read that just Canada is close to processing 1 million Ukie visas. You keep on looking at the other side and always forget the real disaster is happening to the rump Ukraine run out if Kiev.

    Regarding sympathies, let's just wait. Based on history, the winner gets the sympathy. I think it will happen in this case too.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    Based on history, the winner gets the sympathy. I think it will happen in this case too.

    Based on papers and videos put out by the economist Inozemtsev, it doesn’t appear that Russia is slated to become any sort of a winner as a result of this war. I know that you have an extensive knowledge of economics, and was dismayed when you never took up the call to discus this guy and his prognostications. I’ve already posted the clip above twice. He is a highly illuminated Russian economist, always swaying near the top branches of power?…..

    • Replies: @Beckow
    @Mr. Hack

    I really don't care about musings of 'economists' in Russia, London, Frankfurt, wherever. They know very little and rarely have any exposure to business. They put out 'papers' or videos and prophesize things that never happen and miss things that do all the time. They are morons in a sand-box.

    Winning in a war is not 'economic': it is taking and holding land and destroying the enemy. Kind of exactly the opposite of the economy. For whatever it's worth, Russia has been written off economically dozens of times - it is still there, still has the largest natural resources in the world (around 1/4). Russia will do fine. People want their stuff, they will fight for it or send others to die for it (like the brilliant Ukie manhood bleeding for London bankers), or they will buy it.

    In any case, Russia will survive. I am more worried about some of their wanna-be conquerors or customers, they will fail to conquer and be too poor to buy. You can do a 'video' on that, I am too lazy.

  645. @Mr. Hack
    @Beckow


    Based on history, the winner gets the sympathy. I think it will happen in this case too.
     
    Based on papers and videos put out by the economist Inozemtsev, it doesn't appear that Russia is slated to become any sort of a winner as a result of this war. I know that you have an extensive knowledge of economics, and was dismayed when you never took up the call to discus this guy and his prognostications. I've already posted the clip above twice. He is a highly illuminated Russian economist, always swaying near the top branches of power?.....

    Replies: @Beckow

    I really don’t care about musings of ‘economists’ in Russia, London, Frankfurt, wherever. They know very little and rarely have any exposure to business. They put out ‘papers’ or videos and prophesize things that never happen and miss things that do all the time. They are morons in a sand-box.

    Winning in a war is not ‘economic’: it is taking and holding land and destroying the enemy. Kind of exactly the opposite of the economy. For whatever it’s worth, Russia has been written off economically dozens of times – it is still there, still has the largest natural resources in the world (around 1/4). Russia will do fine. People want their stuff, they will fight for it or send others to die for it (like the brilliant Ukie manhood bleeding for London bankers), or they will buy it.

    In any case, Russia will survive. I am more worried about some of their wanna-be conquerors or customers, they will fail to conquer and be too poor to buy. You can do a ‘video’ on that, I am too lazy.

  646. @Beckow
    @A123

    What do you mean by 'evidence'? The policy didn't change: blocking the Minsk deal, arming Kiev. It led directly to the war - for 4 years of MAGA the lib-dem interventionist policy continued. It matters very little if it was intentional or out of Trump's weakness.

    I agree to one thing: if Trump was in power when the war actually started he would most likely kept the insane escalation under control. But while in power Trump had an opportunity to force a settlement and he didn't. Maybe he was kept from doing it, but what does that really matter?

    Replies: @A123

    MAGA rule continued with all these policies, incl. Ukraine in Nato

    Do you have any evidence that President Trump was personally “all-in” on Ukraine?

    What do you mean by ‘evidence’? The policy didn’t change

    Do you have any evidence that this issue had large amounts of Presidential focus?

    And, after deep introspection Trump chose this policy as a critical top foreign policy priority?

    blocking the Minsk deal

    When did Trump personally speak out against the Minsk deal? I do not recall that ever happening.

    Can you provide a citation specific to Trump (not a McConnell servitor)?

    out of Trump’s weakness.

    ♣ Is Usain Bolt weak/slow?
    ♣ How effective/fast would Usain Bolt run with 100 lbs chained to each leg?

    The ability of Bolt to proceed quickly in the latter case is not about him being “weak”. It is about conditions beyond his control. Conflating “weakness” with “impossible circumstances” is faulty logic.
    ____

    How much can one President do while being undermined by by the SJW Globalist Deep State? Do you believe:

    • Trump had unlimited power?
    • Trump unlimited scope of action?
    • Trump intentionally chose Ukraine policy as a foreign policy priority?

    None of these things are accurate. Reality shows that the U.S. Presidency as an office, when not supported by the Legislature or Judiciary, is limited.

    ♦ Ukraine was a contained, low priority issue that was not going anywhere.
    ♦ 1st/2nd Tier domestic issues such as the Mueller witch hunt took priority.

    Your complaint is “An impossible thing did not happen!” I hate to break it to you, but impossible things never happen.

    Thus, again, the correct way to phrase your objection is:

    “Ukraine was a 3rd, possibly 4th, tier issue during Trump’s 1st Term. The Deep State managed to continue trivial and unimportant policies that did not rise to the attention of the Commander In Chief.”

    There was lots of leftover mischief from prior administrations that Trump was unable to fix. In part due to Deep State, establishment resistance. If you insist on assigning blame, do it accurately. The SJW Globalist policy you are complaining about is an Obama, or possibly GW Bush, initiative.
    ___

    The first chance at a real MAGA administration is after the 2024 election. And, even then there will be limits, as it is unlikely to feature a fully MAGA Senate.

    PEACE 😇

  647. Some might call me mad, but I swear I can detect a precipitous drop in the quality of French fries, and I believe it is due to inflation and/or supply issues.

    Takes a very specific type of potato to make good-quality fries. Has to be grown in specific soil and needs to have the right moisture content.

    Well, I think something has happened. Maybe, someone else is buying those potatoes, right now. But like the visible changes in the quality of bacon due to feed changes, I believe there have been invisible changes to fries.

    • Replies: @A123
    @songbird


    I swear I can detect a precipitous drop in the quality of French fries, and I believe it is due to inflation and/or supply issues.
     
    • How long does frying oil last?
    • Can that life be extended (lower temperature, allowed more brown degradation)?
    • Would lower temp also save on energy cost?
    • Are there cheaper oil blends?

    I doubt the taters are the weak link.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @songbird

    , @Yahya
    @songbird


    I swear I can detect a precipitous drop in the quality of French fries, and I believe it is due to inflation and/or supply issues.
     
    It probably has more to do with increased diversity in America than supply chain issues or the like. Hispanic potatoe farmers tend to have less moist hands that white farmers, that's why the potatoes come out wrong. I'm sure blacks are to blame as well for these low-quality potatoes. Haven't figured out precisely how yet though.

    Replies: @Matra, @Philip Owen

  648. @Beckow
    @Mikel

    To summarize what you say was a better option for Russia: Do nothing.

    Oh, and open more MacDonalds and quietly hope that Ukraine won't be in Nato in 2023, but only in 2025, or even 2030.


    Ukraine possibly joining NATO and oppressing the Russian language
     
    You are not addressing reality: Nato WAS in Ukraine, it was expanding, it was building bases - 'joint and temporary', but in reality Nato bases - the fig leave of postponing formal membership wouldn't fool a monkey, why do you hide behind 'possibly'?

    MAGA rule continued with all these policies, incl. Ukraine in Nato. Electing Zelensky by 70% to have peace and equal rights for Russians reversed with speed not seen since De Gaulle pulled out of Algeria. You ignore all of that to talk about some ideals, peace, non-intervention, etc...well, there was a de facto state of war on Russian-Ukie border since 2014. It was escalating, Kiev and the West were raising the stakes.

    I never support any wars because wars are the worst context for conscience and rationality. But to unilaterally blame only Russia for this war is a lie: they were very seriously and forcefully challenged on their own borders and within their own Russian-speaking community. It is incomprehensible that you would claim that other nations would put up with it. And the best analogy is US - Russia and US are roughly comparable. If one can, so can the other.

    In wars force prevails. So far it has been a rolling disaster, but Russia accomplished its primary goals:
    - Nato is out of Ukraine and visibly scared to go too far in helping Kiev
    - the issue of treatment of the very large Russian minority is on the table - it can no longer be ignored as Europe ignored for the last 8 years, any settlement will address that.

    But it is ugly and I really wish it had not come to this. I don't really like to predict - let's leave that to the heavens - so any opinions are snapshots of what one sees at that given time. In retrospect we obviously see more. Blood will decide this - and it was as much the fault of Kiev, Nato, Brussels, London, and also MAGA that did exactly nothing to solve this situation peacefully. So have your MAGA, I wish them well, but in 2017-20 in Ukraine they failed.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @A123, @Mikel

    To summarize what you say was a better option for Russia: Do nothing.

    Actually yes, doing nothing was a much better option than unleashing the bloodiest war in Europe since WWII that could lead us to WWIII. Incomparably better.

    But I didn’t say ‘do nothing’. I said change course to concentrate on internal development rather than trying to become a scary superpower and build good relations with neighbors and opponents while maintaining a very strong deterrence force. In the long run, it would have worked much better for Russia’s security and the treatment of its co-ethnics abroad.

    The same thing that the US should do, btw. But we all know what happened to “MAGA”. No need to revisit that sad episode.

    You are not addressing reality: Nato WAS in Ukraine, it was expanding, it was building bases

    I think I have addressed that head-on. Now NATO is in Ukraine in full force, killing Russian soldiers and generals and testing their weapon systems with Russians as real life targets and Ukrainians as expendable cannon fodder. On top of that, NATO has formally extended to two Russian neighbors and added hundreds of kms of direct borders with Russia. What a disastrous outcome for a military operation that hoped to keep NATO away from Russia.

    But perhaps the defense of Russian speakers in Ukraine has even gone worse. How many of the thousands of civilians, among them children, killed by Russian bombs in Mariupol and so many other Eastern Ukrainian cities, would have chosen that fate rather than continuing to belong to Ukraine? 1%? If killing such a large amount of innocent people is the only way you have to “liberate” them, you can stick your liberation up your aß, as far as I’m concerned. And this goes equally for Russia, Ukraine, the US, China or any other country, big or small.

    You say that wars are decided by the elites, not by common people, and that you don’t really support this war but then go to extraordinary lengths to explain how Putin had “no choice” but start and maintain this bloodbath. It’s not me you have to explain to that Ukraine and the West also have blood on their hands, including in this war, but there is a serious contradiction in your statements.

    • Replies: @A123
    @Mikel


    we all know what happened to “MAGA”.
     
    The EPIC VICTORY of MAGA foreign policy. No new wars started, despite sociopath Khamenei's provocation. Did you miss the graphic above? Apparently so. Let me repeat the TRUTH for you.

     
    https://joannenova.com.au/wp-content/presidents-wars.jpg
     

    Yes, everyone knows that no new wars happened under MAGA.

    No need to revisit that sad episode
     
    Because Trump refused to start wars:

    • Warmonger Bill Kristol was Sad.
    Mikel the Warmonger was Sad.
    • Warmonger George Will was Sad.

    I am sorry that you are a NeoConDemocrat who desires the enrichment of the MIC.

    -- Why do you find your Not-The-President Biden an aspirational war leader?
    -- Have you considered options other than immoral, NeoCon warmongering?

    Saying these crazy NeoCon things makes you sound like a Low-IQ Yahoo troll.

    #LetsGoBrandon 😇
    , @Beckow
    @Mikel


    ...In the long run, it would have worked much better for Russia’s security and the treatment of its co-ethnics abroad.
     
    How long? Decades? Centuries? We live now. It was now that the co-ethnics were oppressed (and many killed), it was now that Nato was openly turning Ukraine into a military forward base to threaten Russia: bases, training, weapons, crazy rhetoric.

    Yes, a country can always do nothing - and I would do - but I understand why Russia finally moved. The logic of threats is that security people are paid to take them seriously - they will exaggerate and go paranoid. It is to Russia's credit that they stayed patient for the last 8 years and were actively looking for a compromise, pleading with the West to let the insane 'Ukraine in Nato' plan go. Who would that hurt?

    But Nato couldn't, their existence is based on doing something. Russia is there, it looks vulnerable, why not go as far as the crazy nervous neo-con chickens can dream? It is no skin of their back, they are not at risk, they make great living. It feeds them emotionally: the sense of importance, masters of the universe, movies will be made.


    the defense of Russian speakers in Ukraine has even gone worse.
     
    The ones who survive may not see it that way. They are now in the center: they will either be eliminated in various ways or they will come out on top. War is hell, it is defined by killing, once it started, why complain?

    You and I disagree on the outcome of the war so far and there is no way to settle it, it is too early. It may turn out that one is right, or not, or something completely else will happen. Since we are at beginning, my bet is on something else. We will see.


    go to extraordinary lengths to explain how Putin had “no choice” but start and maintain this bloodbath.
     
    To explain is why we are here. Do you prefer not to know or understand? The other side has a point of view, that's why there is a war. The facile dismissals don't help. There is no contradiction between trying to understand and wanting peace. Probably the opposite.

    My not-very-thoughtful position has been consistent: let go of Crimea, take the Minsk deal and freeze or cancel Ukraine in Nato. I underestimated the emotions and intensity on all sides and turned out to be wrong. But there must a way out of this that doesn't destroy the region - one thing I care about. Maybe I realized earlier than others that for Russia doing nothing was not an option. Now I sense that losing is not an option. The problem it is not an option for the West either.

    Replies: @Mikel

  649. @songbird
    Some might call me mad, but I swear I can detect a precipitous drop in the quality of French fries, and I believe it is due to inflation and/or supply issues.

    Takes a very specific type of potato to make good-quality fries. Has to be grown in specific soil and needs to have the right moisture content.

    Well, I think something has happened. Maybe, someone else is buying those potatoes, right now. But like the visible changes in the quality of bacon due to feed changes, I believe there have been invisible changes to fries.

    Replies: @A123, @Yahya

    I swear I can detect a precipitous drop in the quality of French fries, and I believe it is due to inflation and/or supply issues.

    • How long does frying oil last?
    • Can that life be extended (lower temperature, allowed more brown degradation)?
    • Would lower temp also save on energy cost?
    • Are there cheaper oil blends?

    I doubt the taters are the weak link.

    PEACE 😇

    • Replies: @songbird
    @A123

    I believe I have also noticed it in baked fries (too high water content) But, perhaps, it is only my eccentricity.

    If I have accurately identified the cause, then that is worrisome. Some say the French fry is the imperial food of America - the food product American society singularly relies on, as much of East Asia once relied on rice, or Rome on wheat.

    I once read a post-apocalyptic story where some Midwestern American town handed out rations of frozen fries as the barbarians were closing in.

    Replies: @A123

  650. @A123
    @Sean

    Gen. SJW Milley is the man who pushed adaptation of the HIMARS,
     

    It is much more likely that any success is "despite" this piece of human detritus, rather than "because" of his wokeness.

    Are you really singing praises for Gen. SJW Milley's competence?

     
    https://img.ifunny.co/images/612b8bcd55fa86347e34d044916ec4a317ca9c16e66dc9ba00f4c4ba93af27d3_1.jpg
     

    You must be proud of his success, arranging for American troops to die in Afghanistan. His "withdrawal" plan was intentionally designed to fail.


    Milley’s undertaking to warn China of a US first strike was quite reasonable
     
    ROTFL. So you believe Sun Tzu said this?

     
    https://snuggleduck.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/general-milley-mi-li-sun-tzu.jpeg
     

    Your praise for Gen. SJW Milley is very Ukie-stan. Only enemies of God & Christianity like this guy.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @Sean, @Wokechoke

    Benedict Arnold was a very good soldier, he just didn’t think Catholics were Christians, which was more common a belief back then; Washington had to forbid his army from their yearly burning of the Pope in effigy’. When Washinton made common cause with French Quebec Catholics and his emissary attended a Mass, Arnold thought the principles of the Revolution had been abandoned.

    If Milley’s pet project the HIMARS gets within range of Crimea it will all be over for Russia’s post 2014 gains.

    • Replies: @A123
    @Sean

    I was not trying to start a discussion about Benedict Arnold. The reference was intended to be humorous not analytical.

    I withdraw the prior meme and offer this one as a replacement.

     
    https://snuggleduck.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/woke-general-mark-milley-with-dyed-hair-and-pins-768x960.jpg
     


    If Milley’s pet project the HIMARS gets within range of Crimea it will all be over for Russia’s post 2014 gains
     
    Once the money is cut off for the extremely expensive consumable rockets, the launchers become useless.

    Where is Zelensky going to get money to buy ammo?

    House Appropriations for Kiev regime aggression are going to be gutted. Depending on the European WEF was an error. While their puppet Not-The-President Biden is still theoretically "in charge", he cannot deliver.

    Will the German Green Party pay full price to buy HIMARS rockets from the U.S.?

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @Sean

  651. @A123
    @Sean

    Gen. SJW Milley is the man who pushed adaptation of the HIMARS,
     

    It is much more likely that any success is "despite" this piece of human detritus, rather than "because" of his wokeness.

    Are you really singing praises for Gen. SJW Milley's competence?

     
    https://img.ifunny.co/images/612b8bcd55fa86347e34d044916ec4a317ca9c16e66dc9ba00f4c4ba93af27d3_1.jpg
     

    You must be proud of his success, arranging for American troops to die in Afghanistan. His "withdrawal" plan was intentionally designed to fail.


    Milley’s undertaking to warn China of a US first strike was quite reasonable
     
    ROTFL. So you believe Sun Tzu said this?

     
    https://snuggleduck.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/general-milley-mi-li-sun-tzu.jpeg
     

    Your praise for Gen. SJW Milley is very Ukie-stan. Only enemies of God & Christianity like this guy.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @Sean, @Wokechoke

    The thing about Arnold is that he was the general most responsible for the victory of the Patriot Cause. He won the key battles, led the capture of the British cannon at Ticonderoga, led the failed but brave expedition to Quebec, won the naval battles on Lake Champlain and basically won the battle of Saratoga. He took a bullet at the end of that battle, recovered, became a politico and was then out politicked by Nathan Greene.

    He betrayed no one apart from George Washington personally. Had a lot of integrity. Too much integrity. Like Achilles.

  652. @Mikel
    @Beckow


    To summarize what you say was a better option for Russia: Do nothing.
     
    Actually yes, doing nothing was a much better option than unleashing the bloodiest war in Europe since WWII that could lead us to WWIII. Incomparably better.

    But I didn't say 'do nothing'. I said change course to concentrate on internal development rather than trying to become a scary superpower and build good relations with neighbors and opponents while maintaining a very strong deterrence force. In the long run, it would have worked much better for Russia's security and the treatment of its co-ethnics abroad.

    The same thing that the US should do, btw. But we all know what happened to "MAGA". No need to revisit that sad episode.

    You are not addressing reality: Nato WAS in Ukraine, it was expanding, it was building bases
     
    I think I have addressed that head-on. Now NATO is in Ukraine in full force, killing Russian soldiers and generals and testing their weapon systems with Russians as real life targets and Ukrainians as expendable cannon fodder. On top of that, NATO has formally extended to two Russian neighbors and added hundreds of kms of direct borders with Russia. What a disastrous outcome for a military operation that hoped to keep NATO away from Russia.

    But perhaps the defense of Russian speakers in Ukraine has even gone worse. How many of the thousands of civilians, among them children, killed by Russian bombs in Mariupol and so many other Eastern Ukrainian cities, would have chosen that fate rather than continuing to belong to Ukraine? 1%? If killing such a large amount of innocent people is the only way you have to "liberate" them, you can stick your liberation up your aß, as far as I'm concerned. And this goes equally for Russia, Ukraine, the US, China or any other country, big or small.

    You say that wars are decided by the elites, not by common people, and that you don't really support this war but then go to extraordinary lengths to explain how Putin had "no choice" but start and maintain this bloodbath. It's not me you have to explain to that Ukraine and the West also have blood on their hands, including in this war, but there is a serious contradiction in your statements.

    Replies: @A123, @Beckow

    we all know what happened to “MAGA”.

    The EPIC VICTORY of MAGA foreign policy. No new wars started, despite sociopath Khamenei’s provocation. Did you miss the graphic above? Apparently so. Let me repeat the TRUTH for you.

     

     

    Yes, everyone knows that no new wars happened under MAGA.

    No need to revisit that sad episode

    Because Trump refused to start wars:

    • Warmonger Bill Kristol was Sad.
    Mikel the Warmonger was Sad.
    • Warmonger George Will was Sad.

    I am sorry that you are a NeoConDemocrat who desires the enrichment of the MIC.

    — Why do you find your Not-The-President Biden an aspirational war leader?
    — Have you considered options other than immoral, NeoCon warmongering?

    Saying these crazy NeoCon things makes you sound like a Low-IQ Yahoo troll.

    #LetsGoBrandon 😇

    • LOL: sudden death
  653. @A123
    @songbird


    I swear I can detect a precipitous drop in the quality of French fries, and I believe it is due to inflation and/or supply issues.
     
    • How long does frying oil last?
    • Can that life be extended (lower temperature, allowed more brown degradation)?
    • Would lower temp also save on energy cost?
    • Are there cheaper oil blends?

    I doubt the taters are the weak link.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @songbird

    I believe I have also noticed it in baked fries (too high water content) But, perhaps, it is only my eccentricity.

    If I have accurately identified the cause, then that is worrisome. Some say the French fry is the imperial food of America – the food product American society singularly relies on, as much of East Asia once relied on rice, or Rome on wheat.

    I once read a post-apocalyptic story where some Midwestern American town handed out rations of frozen fries as the barbarians were closing in.

    • Replies: @A123
    @songbird


    Some say the French fry is the imperial food of America – the food product American society singularly relies on, as much of East Asia once relied on rice, or Rome on wheat.
     
    If you insist on struggling down that path of woe...

    The imperial food of America is (sobbing) "pasteurized processed cheese food". (/sobbing)

    I could go a loooong way on hot wings and cheap beer. But "cheese food"... not proper cheese... "cheese food"...

    I OBJECT !!!!

    PEACE 😇
    ___________

     
    https://cms.zerohedge.com/s3/files/inline-images/2022-10-25_14-26-00.jpg

  654. @songbird
    @A123

    I believe I have also noticed it in baked fries (too high water content) But, perhaps, it is only my eccentricity.

    If I have accurately identified the cause, then that is worrisome. Some say the French fry is the imperial food of America - the food product American society singularly relies on, as much of East Asia once relied on rice, or Rome on wheat.

    I once read a post-apocalyptic story where some Midwestern American town handed out rations of frozen fries as the barbarians were closing in.

    Replies: @A123

    Some say the French fry is the imperial food of America – the food product American society singularly relies on, as much of East Asia once relied on rice, or Rome on wheat.

    If you insist on struggling down that path of woe…

    The imperial food of America is (sobbing) “pasteurized processed cheese food“. (/sobbing)

    I could go a loooong way on hot wings and cheap beer. But “cheese food”… not proper cheese… “cheese food”…

    I OBJECT !!!!

    PEACE 😇
    ___________

     

    • LOL: songbird
  655. @Mikel
    @Coconuts


    Understanding of evolution and human evolution specifically raises questions about how plausible the advent of this universal state of pacification is. Possibly it is not even a possibility given the kind of animal humans are.
     
    You are probably right but the fact that there seems to be a positive correlation between the development of a country and the willingness of its inhabitants to kill or die for beliefs may be telling us something perhaps positive about human nature too.

    Granted, these people don't much care when the professional armies of their countries do engage in pointless wars far away and may even be supportive of them, given an adequate informative conditioning (or for the simple reason of supporting their national team, so to speak). But less people willing to go to war should lead to less wars, all else being equal. In fact, how much do even professional soldiers fight for beliefs these days? I don't think that most of them would go to war as unpaid volunteers so not much, probably.

    Another important point raised by Beckow is that historically it has been a minority at the top who have decided to start wars, especially the most ideological ones. The masses have always been brainwashed and/or directly forced to take part in the hostilities. Past the tribal state, most people probably prefer to lead peaceful lives rather than to fight enemies. Beckow then goes on a contradictory tangent with the strange claim that the Russians just had no choice but to engage in the wholesale killing of Russophones that they're now carrying out in Eastern Ukraine but that is another matter.

    Replies: @sudden death, @Beckow, @Coconuts, @Coconuts

    You are probably right but the fact that there seems to be a positive correlation between the development of a country and the willingness of its inhabitants to kill or die for beliefs may be telling us something perhaps positive about human nature too.

    The strange thing about the current situation in some of the most developed countries is that while people are reluctant to kill or die for anything, they are also weirdly reluctant to have children, despite conditions for it being more favourable than ever in history, in theory. (Even with modern contraception etc. it is surprising more couples don’t form and manage 2). One reason this is happening is maybe addressed in the Drieu La Rochelle quote I posted earlier and is linked to risk taking. There might also be some explanation for what seem to be deteriorating relations between the sexes in younger generations there.

    But less people willing to go to war should lead to less wars, all else being equal. In fact, how much do even professional soldiers fight for beliefs these days? I don’t think that most of them would go to war as unpaid volunteers so not much, probably.

    This is true and given the nature of modern warfare it is understandable. It’s hard to say how far people used to fight for beliefs and how far it was for reasons like protecting resources and families, honour and social standing, the latter two being linked to the first two. Beliefs may be hard to disentangle from these other motivations.

    I think before industrial times, when infant mortality was 50%, it could either go higher if you were poor, or be lower if you were wealthier and had more resources. There would always be some incentive there for people to try different means of gathering more resources and gaining social status (wives would be grateful if fewer of their children died) if opportunities arose. Successful fighters and warriors probably always boosted their chances with women, which would be another similar motivation.

    • Replies: @Barbarossa
    @Coconuts


    while people are reluctant to kill or die for anything, they are also weirdly reluctant to have children, despite conditions for it being more favourable than ever in history
     
    I don't think it's really that strange, they are just natural symptoms of the current mindset. I see the modern mindset as essentially being that of the individualistic consumer. We are all our own little gods (or at least we are made to feel like we are! #Pride). Thus what matters is not the wonderful and endless cycle of the generations, but only our brief moment in the sun.

    So why have kids, care about anything but creature comforts, or risk all for a larger ideal when there is another TikTok on queue? If one doesn't care about anything bigger than themselves than they are not likely to go out of their way to undergo risk for anything bigger than themselves.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk, @Coconuts

  656. @Sean
    @A123

    Benedict Arnold was a very good soldier, he just didn't think Catholics were Christians, which was more common a belief back then; Washington had to forbid his army from their yearly burning of the Pope in effigy'. When Washinton made common cause with French Quebec Catholics and his emissary attended a Mass, Arnold thought the principles of the Revolution had been abandoned.

    If Milley's pet project the HIMARS gets within range of Crimea it will all be over for Russia's post 2014 gains.


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K33wlJXNyxY

    Replies: @A123

    I was not trying to start a discussion about Benedict Arnold. The reference was intended to be humorous not analytical.

    I withdraw the prior meme and offer this one as a replacement.

     

     

    If Milley’s pet project the HIMARS gets within range of Crimea it will all be over for Russia’s post 2014 gains

    Once the money is cut off for the extremely expensive consumable rockets, the launchers become useless.

    Where is Zelensky going to get money to buy ammo?

    House Appropriations for Kiev regime aggression are going to be gutted. Depending on the European WEF was an error. While their puppet Not-The-President Biden is still theoretically “in charge”, he cannot deliver.

    Will the German Green Party pay full price to buy HIMARS rockets from the U.S.?

    PEACE 😇

    • Replies: @Sean
    @A123


    Once the money is cut off for the extremely expensive consumable rockets, the launchers become useless
     
    America has so far spent the equivalent of a few days of its current annual defence budget to help Ukraine in the current war, and the money has not come out of that budget but been added to it. The US would have to massively increase its already huge budget if Russia gets any kind of a win out of Ukraine, because it would have to seriously prepare to fight Russia. The Ukraine was is cheap for the US. Both the Russians and Ukrainians wat to keep on with it.

    Russia will win territory in the coming Battles, but they are going to be pounded by HIMARS, so whether the gains will be sustainable is anyone's guess. If Russia seems to be able to hold on to its gains so far and gains it will make shortly with a doubled (at least) force, then Ukraine will be given a longer range and more powerful missiles. So it is going to be very bloody.

    Replies: @A123

  657. The kingdom of Saudi Arabia is warning of an ‘imminent’ attack by Iran upon both Saudi Arabia and US forces in Iraq.

    Saudi Arabia, U.S. on High Alert After Warning of Imminent Iranian Attack

    Saudis said Tehran wants to distract from local protests, and the National Security Council said the U.S. is prepared to respond

    Saudi officials said Iran is poised to carry out attacks on both the kingdom and Erbil, Iraq, in an effort to distract attention from domestic protests that have roiled the country since September…

    ..Iranian authorities have also publicly accused Saudi Arabia, along with the U.S. and Israel, of instigating the demonstrations. Last month, the commander of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps publicly warned Saudi Arabia to rein in coverage of the protests in Iran by Farsi-language satellite news channels, including Iran International, a Saudi-backed satellite television channel based in London popular with many Iranians.

    “This is our last warning, because you are interfering in our internal affairs through these media,” Maj. Gen. Hossein Salami said in remarks reported in state media at military drills in Iran’s East Azerbaijan province. “You are involved in this matter and know that you are vulnerable.”

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/saudi-arabia-u-s-on-high-alert-after-warning-of-imminent-iranian-attack-11667319274?siteid=yhoof2&yptr=yahoo

  658. @songbird
    Some might call me mad, but I swear I can detect a precipitous drop in the quality of French fries, and I believe it is due to inflation and/or supply issues.

    Takes a very specific type of potato to make good-quality fries. Has to be grown in specific soil and needs to have the right moisture content.

    Well, I think something has happened. Maybe, someone else is buying those potatoes, right now. But like the visible changes in the quality of bacon due to feed changes, I believe there have been invisible changes to fries.

    Replies: @A123, @Yahya

    I swear I can detect a precipitous drop in the quality of French fries, and I believe it is due to inflation and/or supply issues.

    It probably has more to do with increased diversity in America than supply chain issues or the like. Hispanic potatoe farmers tend to have less moist hands that white farmers, that’s why the potatoes come out wrong. I’m sure blacks are to blame as well for these low-quality potatoes. Haven’t figured out precisely how yet though.

    • LOL: Bashibuzuk, Barbarossa
    • Replies: @Matra
    @Yahya

    Diversity did play a role in decline of fries/chips in a number of places where they stopped frying them in beef tallow or lard. McDonald's switched from, I believe, beef in the 1990s to vegetable oil supposedly due to health concerns of Americans in general (somewhat ironic in retrospect) but I recall some successful court case and significant payout in the late 80s/early 90s to Hindus who'd mistakenly thought the fries were vegan. Not as significant as having your girls raped and cut-up by Algerians and Pakistanis but still another example of why diversity sucks.

    , @Philip Owen
    @Yahya

    Mexicans have been picking Idaho potatoes since the late 1970s at least. Seasonal workers rather than migrants.

  659. @Bashibuzuk
    @LatW

    There were even more hard-core books published back in the day. But the authors of these books did not understand in what world we are living. They actually do not go far enough in their thinking.

    Having discovered the antisemitic (judophobic to be more precise) angle, they seldom make the next step and ask "how did we get there?". For those who do (who are few and far between, Kevin McDonald being one among them, Igor' Shafarevich - another, Laurent Guyenot on this site is also one of them) the analysis becomes more historical and sociological and yields some interesting results. But this is also an intermediate level. Questions about "how does it get to this historical and social organization?" remain. Shafarevich named one of his books "A three thousand years enigma". The "enigmatic" part remains.

    It remains because it is outside the scope of rational and materialist academic analysis and outside of our current tradition of thinking, believing and behaving. The questions asked by the most intelligent among these authors cannot be correctly answered by using our usual intellectual approach. And of course anger and violent exaltation do not lead to the right answers either. They would just lead to suffering of mostly innocent human beings. It happened before and did solve nothing, actually just making the situation worse.

    One has to often go back to the beginnings of the pathology to find the real causative agent, the symptoms and morbid alterations experienced by the patient after years of chronic disease are sometimes not informative enough to pinpoint the real pathogen behind the pathological process. Think of Lyme disease, advanced syphilis or HIV for that matter. Or cancers that might be caused by viruses contracted years ago and gone completely asymptomatic and unnoticed.

    Our whole civilization is affected with a complex disease. Some would say that it is just the reflection of human nature. But humans are social and spiritual animals, their true nature is conditioned by society and spiritually altered by belief systems. Humans are clever monkeys that are capable of metaphysics. Why are we capable of, and sometimes feel the urge of finding meaning behind and beyond the physical realm? That should be the question.

    Because different human primate tribes find different metaphysical answers to their questions. Some of these answers are probably more aligned with the way our Reality functions on a pragmatic level but they end up causing more trouble and suffering than the answers which really aim it for the crux of the matter, the inner core of human nature. One cannot feed oneself with Archetypes, but one becomes spiritually degraded without them and ends up a slave to those who kept the Spiritual Attractors of their ancestors "well fed" and "energized". And those who happen to embody a more aggressive Archetype, bent on expansion and domination become the catalysts of Apocalyptic change ("дрожжи революции") that is the Progress leading to our potential dehumanization and outright destruction as a species.

    That is something the young people who have composed the song below might have understood on an intuitive level. They're up to something here. 988 is the officially recognized date of the Baptism of the Rus, it is of course an historical approximation. Abrahamic religious movements / belief systems arrived to what is now Russia/Ukraine/Belarus earlier and completely triumphed much later. There were still pagans in fifteenth century and "native" Russian Orthodoxy got strongly tainted with pagan psychology, hence the "need" to "rectify" the whole thing during the Raskol.

    https://youtu.be/P8SAtQ4e7Dg

    And Dmitry is absolutely right, one uses a software which characteristics one does not understand at one's own perils. Sometimes one needs to reset the whole system and purge the malware from the hardware to get the things right.

    Anyways, today is the Feast of the Ancestors, we shall direct our memories and our love towards those who made our existence possible through their own lives, suffering and sacrifice.

    С праздником брат!

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Mr. Hack, @LatW

    There were even more hard-core books published back in the day.

    Yes, the book is in line with the open spirit of those days. But I suspect that this kind of a book can easily be used to stifle other, less militant, but still important books.

    [MORE]

    I do appreciate its tone, but, tbh, I wasn’t really looking for that type of book (my friend just threw it in as a present along with the Темнозорь album, lol). The list of the banned literature is quite long now (with several what look like язычник books, of course).

    They actually do not go far enough in their thinking. For those who do (who are few and far between, [..] the analysis becomes more historical and sociological and yields some interesting results.

    We have a book like this, too, written in the 1920s, called “The thousand year long combatting of our ancestral faith”, combatting as in “attempt at eradication”, better translated into Russian, actually, as “Тысячелетнее подавление нашего божественности ” (we call it богадержания – a word I just invented, it’s what we call our faith in modern times – мы держим, храним с собой Бога, богов). It is much milder than Istarkov’s book, but with similar themes (and more focused on Sanskrit). Needless to say, the Bolshevik tried to destroy this book, but didn’t succeed.

    The “enigmatic” part remains.

    There might be some very basic things at play, such as that an organism that grows in a desert will most likely be different from an organism that grows in the forest or in some colder climes. Those are just traits. The key is to circumscribe and keep proper boundaries. Both physical and mental. Not to mention political. Sorry, if this seems like a simplistic outlook.

    Or cancers that might be caused by viruses contracted years ago and gone completely asymptomatic and unnoticed.

    Those are incurable. A good comparison, because one doesn’t notice until it’s late. Remember that these also have to do with immunity. One might want to think about how to keep their immunity strong. Also, children don’t have to be exposed to them. The children are ours, not theirs.

    Our whole civilization is affected with a complex disease.

    Which civilization would that be? The human civilization or Western civilization in particular? I’m not really predisposed to such a gloomy, deterministic outlook (even if one might think of it descriptively that way from a certain perspective). Regardless of the culture or civilization that a certain mind is born into, the mind is powerful enough to seek light, the mind is free (it exists beyond a certain culture or religion), even if the mind is lackadaisical, life will bring pain / suffering/ experience or other types of inspiration (such as epiphanies) and through this experience the mind / the soul will be moved towards advancing or opening. As the mind matures, grows stronger through processing this suffering, so it becomes more resourceful, agile. Maybe, wise?

    And those who happen to embody a more aggressive Archetype, bent on expansion and domination become the catalysts of Apocalyptic change (“дрожжи революции”) that is the Progress leading to our potential dehumanization and outright destruction as a species.

    I understand why you feel compelled to bring that up, given current times. I kind of tend to view the archetypes in a similar way that Joseph Campbell does (in The Hero with a Thousand Faces) not so much as competing, but just separate archetypes that show up through various narratives. As a reference to something that was before, the monomyth, that can be replicated over and over, in different spaces and times, but always reverts to the same beginning (original concept). But I’m assuming you meant that there could be certain forces that use an archetype in an aggressive or overexposed way to achieve certain goals.

    988 is the officially recognized date of the Baptism of the Rus, it is of course an historical approximation.

    It’s good that they reference this number, it is definitely meaningful. In my community we don’t reference such dates (except for basic historical events) because we don’t recognize or accept this. We keep following that which is timeless. I view it very dryly these days, as certain historical events that we were subjected to, but that doesn’t interfere with the continuity. I know it is naive and completely larp-y, but it doesn’t bother me. 😊

    I like that song by Srub, right on, very good lyrics “Забытый голос всего лесного” – very accurate. Except not forgotten! Not forgotten. And I really like that part “матерей стонами, детскими криками“, it gives the mental connection with the ancestors and the kind of, hopefully, never ending timeline that we have experienced together.

    The video is controversial though (I know what they mean with the churches but I wouldn’t want to associate my tradition with that), basically, it is similar to what Istarkov wrote. First they displaced the ancient faith, then they were themselves displaced by the Bolshevik, and then the communist spawn ate the original communists (in the late 80s and early 90s), it’s a cycle, where the spawn devours its originator. A cycle of destruction.

    I noticed the young Russian ethnonats play this song, too. Btw, these are not new themes, there have been other musicians who have tackled this, with the central theme revolving around “the lie”. Or on the other hand – “rebirth”. Maybe in a more simple, less esoteric, way than this piece, but it’s been around.

    С праздником

    In my tradition, the whole month of October (and beyond) is the time of remembrance and should be reserved for deep reflection and mediation, in fact, it lasts all the way until the Solstice. It is a dark period, but the Sun will be returning soon. This year it is not much of a праздник given what is going on, especially in the area around Dnipro (which is our ancestral abode, whence we came). Those who are laying there right now deserve a ritual and a blessing. Dnipro is indeed a river of souls now…

    The river of Veles overfloweth, spilling over its banks.
    Thou shall remain on the other side.
    We shall remain on this side.

    • Replies: @LatW
    @LatW

    Тысячелетнее подавление нашей божественности, is what it is called, sorry for the typo. Meaningful title, I'd say. These kinds of things can take a whole millennium. And still not work.

    Сколько
    Крестов над нами
    Они поднимут?

    Wow.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

  660. @LatW
    @Bashibuzuk


    There were even more hard-core books published back in the day.
     
    Yes, the book is in line with the open spirit of those days. But I suspect that this kind of a book can easily be used to stifle other, less militant, but still important books.


    I do appreciate its tone, but, tbh, I wasn't really looking for that type of book (my friend just threw it in as a present along with the Темнозорь album, lol). The list of the banned literature is quite long now (with several what look like язычник books, of course).

    They actually do not go far enough in their thinking. For those who do (who are few and far between, [..] the analysis becomes more historical and sociological and yields some interesting results.
     
    We have a book like this, too, written in the 1920s, called "The thousand year long combatting of our ancestral faith", combatting as in "attempt at eradication", better translated into Russian, actually, as "Тысячелетнее подавление нашего божественности " (we call it богадержания - a word I just invented, it's what we call our faith in modern times - мы держим, храним с собой Бога, богов). It is much milder than Istarkov's book, but with similar themes (and more focused on Sanskrit). Needless to say, the Bolshevik tried to destroy this book, but didn't succeed.

    The “enigmatic” part remains.
     
    There might be some very basic things at play, such as that an organism that grows in a desert will most likely be different from an organism that grows in the forest or in some colder climes. Those are just traits. The key is to circumscribe and keep proper boundaries. Both physical and mental. Not to mention political. Sorry, if this seems like a simplistic outlook.

    Or cancers that might be caused by viruses contracted years ago and gone completely asymptomatic and unnoticed.
     
    Those are incurable. A good comparison, because one doesn't notice until it's late. Remember that these also have to do with immunity. One might want to think about how to keep their immunity strong. Also, children don't have to be exposed to them. The children are ours, not theirs.

    Our whole civilization is affected with a complex disease.
     
    Which civilization would that be? The human civilization or Western civilization in particular? I'm not really predisposed to such a gloomy, deterministic outlook (even if one might think of it descriptively that way from a certain perspective). Regardless of the culture or civilization that a certain mind is born into, the mind is powerful enough to seek light, the mind is free (it exists beyond a certain culture or religion), even if the mind is lackadaisical, life will bring pain / suffering/ experience or other types of inspiration (such as epiphanies) and through this experience the mind / the soul will be moved towards advancing or opening. As the mind matures, grows stronger through processing this suffering, so it becomes more resourceful, agile. Maybe, wise?

    And those who happen to embody a more aggressive Archetype, bent on expansion and domination become the catalysts of Apocalyptic change (“дрожжи революции”) that is the Progress leading to our potential dehumanization and outright destruction as a species.
     
    I understand why you feel compelled to bring that up, given current times. I kind of tend to view the archetypes in a similar way that Joseph Campbell does (in The Hero with a Thousand Faces) not so much as competing, but just separate archetypes that show up through various narratives. As a reference to something that was before, the monomyth, that can be replicated over and over, in different spaces and times, but always reverts to the same beginning (original concept). But I'm assuming you meant that there could be certain forces that use an archetype in an aggressive or overexposed way to achieve certain goals.

    988 is the officially recognized date of the Baptism of the Rus, it is of course an historical approximation.
     
    It's good that they reference this number, it is definitely meaningful. In my community we don't reference such dates (except for basic historical events) because we don't recognize or accept this. We keep following that which is timeless. I view it very dryly these days, as certain historical events that we were subjected to, but that doesn't interfere with the continuity. I know it is naive and completely larp-y, but it doesn't bother me. 😊

    I like that song by Srub, right on, very good lyrics "Забытый голос всего лесного" - very accurate. Except not forgotten! Not forgotten. And I really like that part "матерей стонами, детскими криками", it gives the mental connection with the ancestors and the kind of, hopefully, never ending timeline that we have experienced together.

    The video is controversial though (I know what they mean with the churches but I wouldn't want to associate my tradition with that), basically, it is similar to what Istarkov wrote. First they displaced the ancient faith, then they were themselves displaced by the Bolshevik, and then the communist spawn ate the original communists (in the late 80s and early 90s), it's a cycle, where the spawn devours its originator. A cycle of destruction.

    I noticed the young Russian ethnonats play this song, too. Btw, these are not new themes, there have been other musicians who have tackled this, with the central theme revolving around "the lie". Or on the other hand - "rebirth". Maybe in a more simple, less esoteric, way than this piece, but it's been around.

    С праздником
     
    In my tradition, the whole month of October (and beyond) is the time of remembrance and should be reserved for deep reflection and mediation, in fact, it lasts all the way until the Solstice. It is a dark period, but the Sun will be returning soon. This year it is not much of a праздник given what is going on, especially in the area around Dnipro (which is our ancestral abode, whence we came). Those who are laying there right now deserve a ritual and a blessing. Dnipro is indeed a river of souls now...

    The river of Veles overfloweth, spilling over its banks.
    Thou shall remain on the other side.
    We shall remain on this side.

    Replies: @LatW

    Тысячелетнее подавление нашей божественности, is what it is called, sorry for the typo. Meaningful title, I’d say. These kinds of things can take a whole millennium. And still not work.

    Сколько
    Крестов над нами
    Они поднимут?

    Wow.

    • Replies: @Bashibuzuk
    @LatW


    Тысячелетнее подавление нашей божественности,
     
    Tat tvam asi.

    By twisting a bit the Church Slavonic we might come to a highly similar Тут твой еси.

    The Theosis Mr Hack is so fond of (and rightly so) in Orthodox Christian theology is most probably an Indo-European theological concept (to use the politically correct terminology and avoid the most evil Ar. word).

    When your Highest God is named Brahman and your priestly Varna is called Brahmin you can easily see what were the Priestly caste ultimate aspirations.

    And all these complex Neoplatonicist emanations are oddly similar to some of the Upanishad theological speculations (or if one preferred, experimental findings through meditation).

    At the time of Sts Cyril and Methodius, the Byzantine chronists wrote that "despite being pagan" Slavs recognized a higher God above all other minor gods of their pantheon. Of course they did, they were at the time very close to the archaic form of Indo-European (yeah I know...) religious tradition which has formed in Central Europe during the Unetice Culture period during which Bell Beaker and Corded Ware cultures intermixed.

    At that time a single cultural ans spiritual space united Y haplogroups R1a, R1b and I populations, forming the majority of current European genetic populations. It was around 4000 years ago, before the Hittites moved South-East and entered the Middle East including modern day Palestine/Israel. Before Arkaim-Sintashta people entered BAMAC territory and then invaded Northern Hindustan.
    And well before Abraham (a brahman?) made the sudden discovery of a personal God.

    And yeah, a cross is just a simplified and static swastika. Although both are of course a solar symbol (among other things). And Sun it is a-rising when summer comes.

    😉



    https://youtu.be/f2xl-RJBXVc

    I could add that Buddha was originally described as "blue eyed and golden hued", descended from the mythical Sun Dynasty, and his clans' name was very close to the name given to the main branch of Central Asian Scythians.

    No surprise Buddhists cherish swastika to this very day as an auspicious symbol.

    And yeah: Hindu = Vend(u) after a couple of thousand years of pronunciation deformation. After all, to this very day Lithuanian is the closest language to Sanskrit, while 45% of Russian words from the Vologda region dialect have direct lexical cognates with Sanskrit as well. Imagine how close our languages might have been in Unetice times.

    🙂

    Replies: @Seraphim

  661. @A123
    @Sean

    I was not trying to start a discussion about Benedict Arnold. The reference was intended to be humorous not analytical.

    I withdraw the prior meme and offer this one as a replacement.

     
    https://snuggleduck.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/woke-general-mark-milley-with-dyed-hair-and-pins-768x960.jpg
     


    If Milley’s pet project the HIMARS gets within range of Crimea it will all be over for Russia’s post 2014 gains
     
    Once the money is cut off for the extremely expensive consumable rockets, the launchers become useless.

    Where is Zelensky going to get money to buy ammo?

    House Appropriations for Kiev regime aggression are going to be gutted. Depending on the European WEF was an error. While their puppet Not-The-President Biden is still theoretically "in charge", he cannot deliver.

    Will the German Green Party pay full price to buy HIMARS rockets from the U.S.?

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @Sean

    Once the money is cut off for the extremely expensive consumable rockets, the launchers become useless

    America has so far spent the equivalent of a few days of its current annual defence budget to help Ukraine in the current war, and the money has not come out of that budget but been added to it. The US would have to massively increase its already huge budget if Russia gets any kind of a win out of Ukraine, because it would have to seriously prepare to fight Russia. The Ukraine was is cheap for the US. Both the Russians and Ukrainians wat to keep on with it.

    Russia will win territory in the coming Battles, but they are going to be pounded by HIMARS, so whether the gains will be sustainable is anyone’s guess. If Russia seems to be able to hold on to its gains so far and gains it will make shortly with a doubled (at least) force, then Ukraine will be given a longer range and more powerful missiles. So it is going to be very bloody.

    • Replies: @A123
    @Sean


    The US would have to massively increase its already huge budget
     
    I understand why you emotionally want your side to receive more money. However, the real world situation is quite different: (1)

    GOP Will Likely Oppose More Ukraine Aid If Republicans Win House Back — McCarthy, Vance, Masters

    “I do think that we have to get to a point, and this is where we do disagree, we’ve got to stop the money spigot to Ukraine eventually,” said J.D. Vance, the venture capitalist and author who’s in a close race for a US Senate seat in Ohio, adding that he wants “the Ukrainians to be successful,” but not through more US funding.

    “We cannot fund a long-term military conflict that I think ultimately has diminishing returns for our own country,” he told ABC, adding “I think we’re at the point where we’ve given enough money in Ukraine, I really do. … The Europeans need to step up. And frankly, if the Ukrainians and the Europeans, more importantly, knew that America wasn’t going to foot the bill, they might actually step up.”

     

    Even the weasel-like McCarthy is pre-announcing inevitable cuts. Other things will be prioritized ahead of this fight that has nothing to do with America.

    Does anyone think that Germany and France will pony up $60B?


    if Russia gets any kind of a win out of Ukraine ... [the U.S.] would have to seriously prepare to fight Russia.
     
    Huh? Few in the U.S. deeply care about Ukraine.

    Not-The-President Biden cannot obtain the necessary Authorization for Use of Military Force [AUMF] for direct involvement in Ukraine. Without an AUMF, there is no U.S.-Russia fight to prepare for.

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/gop-will-likely-oppose-more-ukraine-aid-if-republicans-win-house-back-mccarthy

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @Sean

  662. @Mikel
    @Beckow


    To summarize what you say was a better option for Russia: Do nothing.
     
    Actually yes, doing nothing was a much better option than unleashing the bloodiest war in Europe since WWII that could lead us to WWIII. Incomparably better.

    But I didn't say 'do nothing'. I said change course to concentrate on internal development rather than trying to become a scary superpower and build good relations with neighbors and opponents while maintaining a very strong deterrence force. In the long run, it would have worked much better for Russia's security and the treatment of its co-ethnics abroad.

    The same thing that the US should do, btw. But we all know what happened to "MAGA". No need to revisit that sad episode.

    You are not addressing reality: Nato WAS in Ukraine, it was expanding, it was building bases
     
    I think I have addressed that head-on. Now NATO is in Ukraine in full force, killing Russian soldiers and generals and testing their weapon systems with Russians as real life targets and Ukrainians as expendable cannon fodder. On top of that, NATO has formally extended to two Russian neighbors and added hundreds of kms of direct borders with Russia. What a disastrous outcome for a military operation that hoped to keep NATO away from Russia.

    But perhaps the defense of Russian speakers in Ukraine has even gone worse. How many of the thousands of civilians, among them children, killed by Russian bombs in Mariupol and so many other Eastern Ukrainian cities, would have chosen that fate rather than continuing to belong to Ukraine? 1%? If killing such a large amount of innocent people is the only way you have to "liberate" them, you can stick your liberation up your aß, as far as I'm concerned. And this goes equally for Russia, Ukraine, the US, China or any other country, big or small.

    You say that wars are decided by the elites, not by common people, and that you don't really support this war but then go to extraordinary lengths to explain how Putin had "no choice" but start and maintain this bloodbath. It's not me you have to explain to that Ukraine and the West also have blood on their hands, including in this war, but there is a serious contradiction in your statements.

    Replies: @A123, @Beckow

    …In the long run, it would have worked much better for Russia’s security and the treatment of its co-ethnics abroad.

    How long? Decades? Centuries? We live now. It was now that the co-ethnics were oppressed (and many killed), it was now that Nato was openly turning Ukraine into a military forward base to threaten Russia: bases, training, weapons, crazy rhetoric.

    Yes, a country can always do nothing – and I would do – but I understand why Russia finally moved. The logic of threats is that security people are paid to take them seriously – they will exaggerate and go paranoid. It is to Russia’s credit that they stayed patient for the last 8 years and were actively looking for a compromise, pleading with the West to let the insane ‘Ukraine in Nato’ plan go. Who would that hurt?

    But Nato couldn’t, their existence is based on doing something. Russia is there, it looks vulnerable, why not go as far as the crazy nervous neo-con chickens can dream? It is no skin of their back, they are not at risk, they make great living. It feeds them emotionally: the sense of importance, masters of the universe, movies will be made.

    the defense of Russian speakers in Ukraine has even gone worse.

    The ones who survive may not see it that way. They are now in the center: they will either be eliminated in various ways or they will come out on top. War is hell, it is defined by killing, once it started, why complain?

    You and I disagree on the outcome of the war so far and there is no way to settle it, it is too early. It may turn out that one is right, or not, or something completely else will happen. Since we are at beginning, my bet is on something else. We will see.

    go to extraordinary lengths to explain how Putin had “no choice” but start and maintain this bloodbath.

    To explain is why we are here. Do you prefer not to know or understand? The other side has a point of view, that’s why there is a war. The facile dismissals don’t help. There is no contradiction between trying to understand and wanting peace. Probably the opposite.

    My not-very-thoughtful position has been consistent: let go of Crimea, take the Minsk deal and freeze or cancel Ukraine in Nato. I underestimated the emotions and intensity on all sides and turned out to be wrong. But there must a way out of this that doesn’t destroy the region – one thing I care about. Maybe I realized earlier than others that for Russia doing nothing was not an option. Now I sense that losing is not an option. The problem it is not an option for the West either.

    • Replies: @Mikel
    @Beckow


    There is no contradiction between trying to understand and wanting peace.
     
    When you claim once and again that Putin had no choice but to start this catastrophic war you are obviously going beyond just trying to understand. That would be like me saying that NATO had no other choice but to depose Gadhafi or bomb Yugoslavia, although they shouldn't have really done it.

    You are right that listening to what the Russians say is essential to try to understand what is going on and how this is likely to evolve. That's why I personally get most of my information about this war from Russian sources. But to be honest, it's not a great mystery why Putin decided to invade Ukraine if we pay attention to what he said and did in the past years. Because he wanted Russia to be treated like a big superpower with its own sphere of influence again, because he thought that Russia had achieved a much bigger level of military power than it really had and because he was obviously willing to cause massive casualties and damage to civilians in pursuit of his goals. You don't invade a big country like Ukraine and try to remove its military and militias from highly populated cities if you are not willing to kill many innocent civilians. Even when the Donbass militias went on the offensive against the weak Ukrainian army in 2015 they couldn't help killing civilians in Gorlovka, Volnovakha, Mariupol, etc. That was always part of his macabre calculation, even if he thought that the survivors would eventually be better off under Russian rule in case he cares about such things.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Beckow

  663. @Sean
    @A123


    Once the money is cut off for the extremely expensive consumable rockets, the launchers become useless
     
    America has so far spent the equivalent of a few days of its current annual defence budget to help Ukraine in the current war, and the money has not come out of that budget but been added to it. The US would have to massively increase its already huge budget if Russia gets any kind of a win out of Ukraine, because it would have to seriously prepare to fight Russia. The Ukraine was is cheap for the US. Both the Russians and Ukrainians wat to keep on with it.

    Russia will win territory in the coming Battles, but they are going to be pounded by HIMARS, so whether the gains will be sustainable is anyone's guess. If Russia seems to be able to hold on to its gains so far and gains it will make shortly with a doubled (at least) force, then Ukraine will be given a longer range and more powerful missiles. So it is going to be very bloody.

    Replies: @A123

    The US would have to massively increase its already huge budget

    I understand why you emotionally want your side to receive more money. However, the real world situation is quite different: (1)

    GOP Will Likely Oppose More Ukraine Aid If Republicans Win House Back — McCarthy, Vance, Masters

    “I do think that we have to get to a point, and this is where we do disagree, we’ve got to stop the money spigot to Ukraine eventually,” said J.D. Vance, the venture capitalist and author who’s in a close race for a US Senate seat in Ohio, adding that he wants “the Ukrainians to be successful,” but not through more US funding.

    “We cannot fund a long-term military conflict that I think ultimately has diminishing returns for our own country,” he told ABC, adding “I think we’re at the point where we’ve given enough money in Ukraine, I really do. … The Europeans need to step up. And frankly, if the Ukrainians and the Europeans, more importantly, knew that America wasn’t going to foot the bill, they might actually step up.”

    Even the weasel-like McCarthy is pre-announcing inevitable cuts. Other things will be prioritized ahead of this fight that has nothing to do with America.

    Does anyone think that Germany and France will pony up $60B?

    if Russia gets any kind of a win out of Ukraine … [the U.S.] would have to seriously prepare to fight Russia.

    Huh? Few in the U.S. deeply care about Ukraine.

    Not-The-President Biden cannot obtain the necessary Authorization for Use of Military Force [AUMF] for direct involvement in Ukraine. Without an AUMF, there is no U.S.-Russia fight to prepare for.

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/gop-will-likely-oppose-more-ukraine-aid-if-republicans-win-house-back-mccarthy

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @A123


    Huh? Few in the U.S. deeply care about Ukraine.
     
    What, more of your kremlinstooge antics here A123? Now you're spreading outright lies!

    October 10, 2022 Reuters:


    Most Americans agree the U.S. should continue to support Ukraine despite threat of nuclear weapons use by Russia

    The latest wave of our Reuters/Ipsos poll tracking the Russia/Ukraine crisis finds nearly two-thirds of Americans are closely following the Russian invasion of Ukraine... Ultimately though, 73% of Americans say the United States should continue to support Ukraine despite Russia threatening to use nuclear weapons.
     

    The polling also indicates that those Americans that are willing to support a president who advocates suporting Ukraine has fallen from a high of 76% to 69%, still indicating high support for a president who advocates a pro-Ukrainian stance.

    https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/news-polls/americans-agree-us-continue-support-ukraine-despite-russia-threatening-use-nuclear

    , @Sean
    @A123


    “I do think that we have to get to a point, and this is where we do disagree, we’ve got to stop the money spigot to Ukraine eventually,” said J.D. Vance, the venture capitalist and author who’s in a close race for a US Senate seat in Ohio

     

    It's obtuse of Vance to publicly those things' effect are going have on the Kremlin's will to keep on fighting for a clear victory. Vance is performing well below expectation in foreign policy just as he is in his unexpectedly close Ohio senate election. Putin will never compromise without being enticed with the prospect of something he can present as a victory on Russia while at the same time as he is confronted with a scenario of something really bad happening unless he stops while he is ahead. Russia is planning something their General Staff are likely preparing for a literally redoubled offensive using twice the number of troops and plenty of equipment being brought from ever corner of Russia to be in Odessa for Orthodox Christmas.

    Not-The-President Biden cannot obtain the necessary Authorization for Use of Military Force [AUMF] for direct involvement in Ukraine. Without an AUMF, there is no U.S.-Russia fight to prepare for.
     
    There is a lot the US can and will do without actually becoming a combatant. Poland and Romania already have the Army Tactical Missile System, they could give it to Ukraine with tacit permission from the US. Ukraine is going to get it eventually


    Putin triumphant in Ukraine would be making all sorts of demands encroaching on full Nato members such as the withdrawal of US troops ad missile bases from countries like Latvia and even Poland. Please don't try an tell me Putin wouldn't because he'd be satisfied. No and recession of America' sphere of influence in East Europe would draw Russia into more and more risky gambits. There would be a need for a huge US build in Europe matching one by European counties especially Germany (which has the money) to stop him getting any funny ideas. Withdrawing militarily is not an option for the US; their economy is dependent on trade with Europe.

    Replies: @A123

  664. @A123
    @Sean


    The US would have to massively increase its already huge budget
     
    I understand why you emotionally want your side to receive more money. However, the real world situation is quite different: (1)

    GOP Will Likely Oppose More Ukraine Aid If Republicans Win House Back — McCarthy, Vance, Masters

    “I do think that we have to get to a point, and this is where we do disagree, we’ve got to stop the money spigot to Ukraine eventually,” said J.D. Vance, the venture capitalist and author who’s in a close race for a US Senate seat in Ohio, adding that he wants “the Ukrainians to be successful,” but not through more US funding.

    “We cannot fund a long-term military conflict that I think ultimately has diminishing returns for our own country,” he told ABC, adding “I think we’re at the point where we’ve given enough money in Ukraine, I really do. … The Europeans need to step up. And frankly, if the Ukrainians and the Europeans, more importantly, knew that America wasn’t going to foot the bill, they might actually step up.”

     

    Even the weasel-like McCarthy is pre-announcing inevitable cuts. Other things will be prioritized ahead of this fight that has nothing to do with America.

    Does anyone think that Germany and France will pony up $60B?


    if Russia gets any kind of a win out of Ukraine ... [the U.S.] would have to seriously prepare to fight Russia.
     
    Huh? Few in the U.S. deeply care about Ukraine.

    Not-The-President Biden cannot obtain the necessary Authorization for Use of Military Force [AUMF] for direct involvement in Ukraine. Without an AUMF, there is no U.S.-Russia fight to prepare for.

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/gop-will-likely-oppose-more-ukraine-aid-if-republicans-win-house-back-mccarthy

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @Sean

    Huh? Few in the U.S. deeply care about Ukraine.

    What, more of your kremlinstooge antics here A123? Now you’re spreading outright lies!

    October 10, 2022 Reuters:

    Most Americans agree the U.S. should continue to support Ukraine despite threat of nuclear weapons use by Russia

    The latest wave of our Reuters/Ipsos poll tracking the Russia/Ukraine crisis finds nearly two-thirds of Americans are closely following the Russian invasion of Ukraine… Ultimately though, 73% of Americans say the United States should continue to support Ukraine despite Russia threatening to use nuclear weapons.

    The polling also indicates that those Americans that are willing to support a president who advocates suporting Ukraine has fallen from a high of 76% to 69%, still indicating high support for a president who advocates a pro-Ukrainian stance.

    https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/news-polls/americans-agree-us-continue-support-ukraine-despite-russia-threatening-use-nuclear

  665. @Mikhail
    @Sean


    Hodges said before the invasion that the Russians would be unable to take Kiev, and he was right. Just like Mearshiemer was about Russia being fated to attack Ukraine unless it had a nuclear deterent .
     
    Before the 2/24/22 SMO, I didn't believe the Russians would try to take Kiev in the event of their pursuing military action in the former Ukrainian SSR. Based on what has transpired, that wasn't part of the SMO.

    Along with Hodges' comment about the Kiev regime retaking Crimea within the last 12 months, he absurdly claimed that Ukrainians and not Russians beat back the Nazis.

    Concerning Mearsheimer:

    https://strategic-culture.org/news/2019/08/21/getting-real-with-the-us-foreign-policy-establishment-realists/

    Excerpt -

    On the subject of Russia and Ukraine, I’m reminded of a September 5, 2014 PBS NewsHour segment, where noted foreign policy realist John Mearsheimer said: “The Russians have made it very clear that they’re not going to tolerate a situation where Ukraine forms an alliance with NATO, the principle reason that Russia is now in Ukraine and trying to wreck Ukraine.

    And let’s be clear here. Why Russia is trying to wreck Ukraine, is because Russia doesn’t want Ukraine to become part of the West. It doesn’t want it to be integrated into NATO or the EU. And if we follow the prescriptions that Bill and I know Mike favors as well, what we are going to end up doing is further antagonizing Putin. He is going to play more hardball. And the end result is that Ukraine is going to be wrecked as a country, and we’re going to have terrible relations between Russia and the West, which is not in Russia’s interest and not in our interest
    .”

    At a University of Chicago event, Mearsheimer also singles out Russia as seeking to “wreck” Ukraine. He doesn’t use that word to characterize Western actions. Hence, his usage comes across as disproportionate and puzzling. (Offhand, I don’t recall Mearsheimer using a word like “wreck” to describe US actions in Yugoslavia, Iraq and Libya.) When compared to Russia, Mearsheimer has said that he finds more fault with the Western stances taken on Ukraine.


     
    On this matter of yours -

    They had the psychological momentum. The Ukrainian officers were not leading effectively in 2015; that has changed. In his TedX talk of six years ago, Hodges says Lt. Eric Wood (who fought to the death during the Battle of the Bulge on his own initiative ) and Joshua Chamberlain epitomised what is expected of an officer, and that kind of ethos was inculcated into the Ukrainan armed forces. The standing orders were to fight and not retreat unless authorised to do so. There is a lot more surveillance of commanders and other officials by the very numerous Ukrainian security police too. Putin wanted to reprise his Crimea production as if Ukraine had not taken remedial measures to ensure there could be not repitition. As John Gray says Putin is not a military man
     
    We seem to be in disagreement. My points about USSR-Finland in 19399 and Russia being militarily better equipped in 1917 than 1914 weren't addressed by you. These examples lead me to believe that the Kiev regime will not militarily prevail. At the very best, it could IMO possibly get an agreement losing all of the former Ukrainian SSR territory it currently doesn't control.

    Yes, the Kiev regime forces are better than in 2015. A good number of these forces are no more. Many more of them aren't so well armed and trained.

    Russia waiting til 2022 serves to show that Russia gave the peaceful option a chance.

    Replies: @Sean, @LondonBob

    Yes Putin was quite clear in his discussion with the Russian pilots just after the start of the war that the aim was the Donbass, but they not could only attack there as the fortifications were too strong. There was never enough men to take Kiev, as it was the distraction worked with the key priority to secure the land bridge to Crimea secured with Mariupol being taken within a weeks. Claims otherwise are just NATO cope.

    In 2015 the Russia economy was not strong enough, Russia was not strong enough diplomatically, the Russian army was still being reformed with key missile technology still in development.

    • Agree: QCIC
    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @LondonBob


    In 2015 the Russia economy was not strong enough, Russia was not strong enough diplomatically, the Russian army was still being reformed with key missile technology still in development.
     
    And in 2022 Russia met this criteria?

    https://media.tenor.com/KhDlZcyJOLIAAAAM/laugh-emoji.gif
  666. @A123
    @Sean


    The US would have to massively increase its already huge budget
     
    I understand why you emotionally want your side to receive more money. However, the real world situation is quite different: (1)

    GOP Will Likely Oppose More Ukraine Aid If Republicans Win House Back — McCarthy, Vance, Masters

    “I do think that we have to get to a point, and this is where we do disagree, we’ve got to stop the money spigot to Ukraine eventually,” said J.D. Vance, the venture capitalist and author who’s in a close race for a US Senate seat in Ohio, adding that he wants “the Ukrainians to be successful,” but not through more US funding.

    “We cannot fund a long-term military conflict that I think ultimately has diminishing returns for our own country,” he told ABC, adding “I think we’re at the point where we’ve given enough money in Ukraine, I really do. … The Europeans need to step up. And frankly, if the Ukrainians and the Europeans, more importantly, knew that America wasn’t going to foot the bill, they might actually step up.”

     

    Even the weasel-like McCarthy is pre-announcing inevitable cuts. Other things will be prioritized ahead of this fight that has nothing to do with America.

    Does anyone think that Germany and France will pony up $60B?


    if Russia gets any kind of a win out of Ukraine ... [the U.S.] would have to seriously prepare to fight Russia.
     
    Huh? Few in the U.S. deeply care about Ukraine.

    Not-The-President Biden cannot obtain the necessary Authorization for Use of Military Force [AUMF] for direct involvement in Ukraine. Without an AUMF, there is no U.S.-Russia fight to prepare for.

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/gop-will-likely-oppose-more-ukraine-aid-if-republicans-win-house-back-mccarthy

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @Sean

    “I do think that we have to get to a point, and this is where we do disagree, we’ve got to stop the money spigot to Ukraine eventually,” said J.D. Vance, the venture capitalist and author who’s in a close race for a US Senate seat in Ohio

    It’s obtuse of Vance to publicly those things’ effect are going have on the Kremlin’s will to keep on fighting for a clear victory. Vance is performing well below expectation in foreign policy just as he is in his unexpectedly close Ohio senate election. Putin will never compromise without being enticed with the prospect of something he can present as a victory on Russia while at the same time as he is confronted with a scenario of something really bad happening unless he stops while he is ahead. Russia is planning something their General Staff are likely preparing for a literally redoubled offensive using twice the number of troops and plenty of equipment being brought from ever corner of Russia to be in Odessa for Orthodox Christmas.

    Not-The-President Biden cannot obtain the necessary Authorization for Use of Military Force [AUMF] for direct involvement in Ukraine. Without an AUMF, there is no U.S.-Russia fight to prepare for.

    There is a lot the US can and will do without actually becoming a combatant. Poland and Romania already have the Army Tactical Missile System, they could give it to Ukraine with tacit permission from the US. Ukraine is going to get it eventually

    Putin triumphant in Ukraine would be making all sorts of demands encroaching on full Nato members such as the withdrawal of US troops ad missile bases from countries like Latvia and even Poland. Please don’t try an tell me Putin wouldn’t because he’d be satisfied. No and recession of America’ sphere of influence in East Europe would draw Russia into more and more risky gambits. There would be a need for a huge US build in Europe matching one by European counties especially Germany (which has the money) to stop him getting any funny ideas. Withdrawing militarily is not an option for the US; their economy is dependent on trade with Europe.

    • Agree: Johnny Rico, Mr. Hack
    • Replies: @A123
    @Sean




    if Russia gets any kind of a win out of Ukraine … [the U.S.] would have to seriously prepare to fight Russia.
     
    Not-The-President Biden cannot obtain the necessary Authorization for Use of Military Force [AUMF] for direct involvement in Ukraine. Without an AUMF, there is no U.S.-Russia fight to prepare for.
     

    There is a lot the US can and will do without actually becoming a combatant.

     
    That is a 180° about face of your prior stance. Which is your position -- The U.S. will be:

    • In direct, "serious" combat with Russia
    • Not actually become a combatant, no "serious" combat with Russia

    You cannot have it both ways.
    ___

    The Ukraine is geographically expansive. Assimilating 1/2 to 1/3 (or even 1/4) of that land will keep Russia busy for years.

    Don’t try an tell me Putin will push further. Your idea that this is the first domino in a cascade of multiple nations is absurd, inconceivable, and wholly ludicrous.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @Sean

  667. @Sean
    @A123

    Gen. SJW Milley is the man who pushed adaptation of the HIMARS, fourteen of which were enough to check the Russian logistics necessary for their advances. Ukraine fought Russia somewhat asymmetrically and Russia responded by and ongoing methodical targeting Ukraine's energy system

    Milley's undertaking to warn China of a US first strike was quite reasonable in view of the fact that China has very few ICBM's compared to what it could have because China has been pursuing a commercial path to unchallengeable strength, and frightening China could change that. And the assurance concerned ICBMs being used out the blue.

    Milley has had a a few calls with his Russian counterpart GenValery Gerasimov (who the US spared from its now suspended assassination campaign against RusFed commanders). . However thanks to Milley pet project becoming an American gift to Ukraine allied to omniscient US surveillance and intel, HIMARS has done too good a job and the Russian are now abandoning nass in attack for using drones and cruise missiles against essential utilities in Ukraine's cities and towns. Russia is actually doing quite well with its new strategy and the better they do the less chance they'll start toying with the idea of a tactical nuke.

    As John Keegan said, battles are aimed at the disintegration of human groups. I believe the Russians are moving from attacks on the cohesion of military formations to the morale of the population in 'decision making centres' (ie cities). That strategy won't kill a lot of people, but it will disconcert the Ukrainian leadership.

    Replies: @A123, @LondonBob

    Gen. SJW Milley is the man who pushed adaptation of the HIMARS, fourteen of which were enough to check the Russian logistics necessary for their advances. Ukraine fought Russia somewhat asymmetrically and Russia responded by and ongoing methodical targeting Ukraine’s energy system

    Russia finally stalled due to a lack of men, remarkable they advanced so much given the disparity, but the introduction of the Ukrainians trained in the West and ‘mercenaries’, along with contract endings, had an inevitable impact.

    I believe the Russians are moving from attacks on the cohesion of military formations to the morale of the population in ‘decision making centres’ (ie cities). That strategy won’t kill a lot of people, but it will disconcert the Ukrainian leadership.

    No. They are degrading the logistics, the impact of which will lead to the Klain-Blinken regime having a simple choice of fold or escalate, the tactical nuke talk is from those who wish to escalate.

    http://johnhelmer.net/electro-shock-therapy-for-slow-learners-in-the-electric-war-part-iii/

  668. • Thanks: Bashibuzuk
    • Replies: @A123
    @Emil Nikola Richard

    That article appeared here, and I have already issued the necessary correction. It should read: (1)

    America's Subservient Position in Germany's New World Order

    Under Not-The-President Biden, America could not lead Hunter to a brothel. The idea that the U.S. controls "world order" is mind boggling.

    If you believe that Not-The-President Biden's regime is leading:

    -- Name three members of the current administration that have international credibility!
    -- How about even one?

    Yea. verily. The globe rallies behind Victoria Nuland.... Waaaait a sec... Nope... Not gonna happen...

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://www.unz.com/mhudson/germanys-position-in-americas-new-world-order/#comment-5637642

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard

  669. @YetAnotherAnon
    Back on topic, Lula wins Brazil in "an astonishing comeback" - perhaps another "Biden landslide".

    Lula immediately said he would be cosying up to the US (who after all may have put him there).

    Is this a loosening of the BRICs and a weakening of a multipolar world?

    Replies: @LondonBob

    Seen the claims of a rigged election in Brazil, I expect there are issues, it is Brazil after all, but nothing as blatant as in the US in 2020, yet.

    Hard to know with Lula, easy to imagine that the DC elites are so incompetent and wrapped up in their own culture wars that the Democrat elite are celebrating the loss of the mildly pro-US Bolsonaro for the much more China friendly Lula because orange man bad. Overheard the BBC saying it was odd that Putin would congratulate Lula, of course it isn’t at all, even though he was also on good terms with Bolsonaro.

  670. @LondonBob
    @Mikhail

    Yes Putin was quite clear in his discussion with the Russian pilots just after the start of the war that the aim was the Donbass, but they not could only attack there as the fortifications were too strong. There was never enough men to take Kiev, as it was the distraction worked with the key priority to secure the land bridge to Crimea secured with Mariupol being taken within a weeks. Claims otherwise are just NATO cope.

    In 2015 the Russia economy was not strong enough, Russia was not strong enough diplomatically, the Russian army was still being reformed with key missile technology still in development.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    In 2015 the Russia economy was not strong enough, Russia was not strong enough diplomatically, the Russian army was still being reformed with key missile technology still in development.

    And in 2022 Russia met this criteria?

    • Agree: Bashibuzuk
  671. Bashibuzuk says:
    @LatW
    @LatW

    Тысячелетнее подавление нашей божественности, is what it is called, sorry for the typo. Meaningful title, I'd say. These kinds of things can take a whole millennium. And still not work.

    Сколько
    Крестов над нами
    Они поднимут?

    Wow.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

    Тысячелетнее подавление нашей божественности,

    Tat tvam asi.

    By twisting a bit the Church Slavonic we might come to a highly similar Тут твой еси.

    The Theosis Mr Hack is so fond of (and rightly so) in Orthodox Christian theology is most probably an Indo-European theological concept (to use the politically correct terminology and avoid the most evil Ar. word).

    When your Highest God is named Brahman and your priestly Varna is called Brahmin you can easily see what were the Priestly caste ultimate aspirations.

    And all these complex Neoplatonicist emanations are oddly similar to some of the Upanishad theological speculations (or if one preferred, experimental findings through meditation).

    At the time of Sts Cyril and Methodius, the Byzantine chronists wrote that “despite being pagan” Slavs recognized a higher God above all other minor gods of their pantheon. Of course they did, they were at the time very close to the archaic form of Indo-European (yeah I know…) religious tradition which has formed in Central Europe during the Unetice Culture period during which Bell Beaker and Corded Ware cultures intermixed.

    At that time a single cultural ans spiritual space united Y haplogroups R1a, R1b and I populations, forming the majority of current European genetic populations. It was around 4000 years ago, before the Hittites moved South-East and entered the Middle East including modern day Palestine/Israel. Before Arkaim-Sintashta people entered BAMAC territory and then invaded Northern Hindustan.
    And well before Abraham (a brahman?) made the sudden discovery of a personal God.

    And yeah, a cross is just a simplified and static swastika. Although both are of course a solar symbol (among other things). And Sun it is a-rising when summer comes.

    😉

    [MORE]

    I could add that Buddha was originally described as “blue eyed and golden hued”, descended from the mythical Sun Dynasty, and his clans’ name was very close to the name given to the main branch of Central Asian Scythians.

    No surprise Buddhists cherish swastika to this very day as an auspicious symbol.

    And yeah: Hindu = Vend(u) after a couple of thousand years of pronunciation deformation. After all, to this very day Lithuanian is the closest language to Sanskrit, while 45% of Russian words from the Vologda region dialect have direct lexical cognates with Sanskrit as well. Imagine how close our languages might have been in Unetice times.

    🙂

    • Replies: @Seraphim
    @Bashibuzuk

    Have you heard of the Hindu teaching of the Avatara?

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

  672. @Coconuts
    @Mikel


    You are probably right but the fact that there seems to be a positive correlation between the development of a country and the willingness of its inhabitants to kill or die for beliefs may be telling us something perhaps positive about human nature too.
     
    The strange thing about the current situation in some of the most developed countries is that while people are reluctant to kill or die for anything, they are also weirdly reluctant to have children, despite conditions for it being more favourable than ever in history, in theory. (Even with modern contraception etc. it is surprising more couples don't form and manage 2). One reason this is happening is maybe addressed in the Drieu La Rochelle quote I posted earlier and is linked to risk taking. There might also be some explanation for what seem to be deteriorating relations between the sexes in younger generations there.

    But less people willing to go to war should lead to less wars, all else being equal. In fact, how much do even professional soldiers fight for beliefs these days? I don’t think that most of them would go to war as unpaid volunteers so not much, probably.
     
    This is true and given the nature of modern warfare it is understandable. It's hard to say how far people used to fight for beliefs and how far it was for reasons like protecting resources and families, honour and social standing, the latter two being linked to the first two. Beliefs may be hard to disentangle from these other motivations.

    I think before industrial times, when infant mortality was 50%, it could either go higher if you were poor, or be lower if you were wealthier and had more resources. There would always be some incentive there for people to try different means of gathering more resources and gaining social status (wives would be grateful if fewer of their children died) if opportunities arose. Successful fighters and warriors probably always boosted their chances with women, which would be another similar motivation.

    Replies: @Barbarossa

    while people are reluctant to kill or die for anything, they are also weirdly reluctant to have children, despite conditions for it being more favourable than ever in history

    I don’t think it’s really that strange, they are just natural symptoms of the current mindset. I see the modern mindset as essentially being that of the individualistic consumer. We are all our own little gods (or at least we are made to feel like we are! #Pride). Thus what matters is not the wonderful and endless cycle of the generations, but only our brief moment in the sun.

    So why have kids, care about anything but creature comforts, or risk all for a larger ideal when there is another TikTok on queue? If one doesn’t care about anything bigger than themselves than they are not likely to go out of their way to undergo risk for anything bigger than themselves.

    • Replies: @Bashibuzuk
    @Barbarossa


    The last man (German: Letzter Mensch) is a term used by the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche in Thus Spoke Zarathustra to describe the antithesis of his theorized superior being, the Übermensch, whose imminent appearance is heralded by Zarathustra. The last man is the archetypal passive nihilist.
     
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Last_man#:~:text=The%20last%20man%20(German%3A%20Letzter,is%20the%20archetypal%20passive%20nihilist.

    I would say more exactly an archetypal hedonistic nihilist. Which is absolutely natural for people that have renounced all metaphysics. They don't see anything beyond matter, they live, die and decay as matter does. And while they do, they try to have fun to forget that there is an end to it all.

    Replies: @Barbarossa

    , @Coconuts
    @Barbarossa


    So why have kids, care about anything but creature comforts, or risk all for a larger ideal when there is another TikTok on queue?
     
    The weird or thought provoking thing about this is maybe that it itself is the fruit of a great revolutionary ideal, the 'Promethean Voluntarism' of the social revolutionaries of the 19th and 20th centuries. The last man type can be seen as the mass product of the diffusion of Sartre's 'existence precedes essence' idea.

    I think a writer and ex-soldier like Drieu, who was preoccupied with the issue of personal and collective decadence in the 1920s and 30s, was drawn into Fascism by awareness of the potential for an outcome like this. That didn't go well for him or in general. But then things like the fall of the USSR and the end of socialism in Western Europe were indications of serious problems with the revolutionary ideals as they mature. These haven't gone away as we can see at the moment.

    Replies: @Barbarossa

  673. @Yahya
    @songbird


    I swear I can detect a precipitous drop in the quality of French fries, and I believe it is due to inflation and/or supply issues.
     
    It probably has more to do with increased diversity in America than supply chain issues or the like. Hispanic potatoe farmers tend to have less moist hands that white farmers, that's why the potatoes come out wrong. I'm sure blacks are to blame as well for these low-quality potatoes. Haven't figured out precisely how yet though.

    Replies: @Matra, @Philip Owen

    Diversity did play a role in decline of fries/chips in a number of places where they stopped frying them in beef tallow or lard. McDonald’s switched from, I believe, beef in the 1990s to vegetable oil supposedly due to health concerns of Americans in general (somewhat ironic in retrospect) but I recall some successful court case and significant payout in the late 80s/early 90s to Hindus who’d mistakenly thought the fries were vegan. Not as significant as having your girls raped and cut-up by Algerians and Pakistanis but still another example of why diversity sucks.

    • Agree: S
  674. Bashibuzuk says:
    @Barbarossa
    @Coconuts


    while people are reluctant to kill or die for anything, they are also weirdly reluctant to have children, despite conditions for it being more favourable than ever in history
     
    I don't think it's really that strange, they are just natural symptoms of the current mindset. I see the modern mindset as essentially being that of the individualistic consumer. We are all our own little gods (or at least we are made to feel like we are! #Pride). Thus what matters is not the wonderful and endless cycle of the generations, but only our brief moment in the sun.

    So why have kids, care about anything but creature comforts, or risk all for a larger ideal when there is another TikTok on queue? If one doesn't care about anything bigger than themselves than they are not likely to go out of their way to undergo risk for anything bigger than themselves.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk, @Coconuts

    The last man (German: Letzter Mensch) is a term used by the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche in Thus Spoke Zarathustra to describe the antithesis of his theorized superior being, the Übermensch, whose imminent appearance is heralded by Zarathustra. The last man is the archetypal passive nihilist.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Last_man#:~:text=The%20last%20man%20(German%3A%20Letzter,is%20the%20archetypal%20passive%20nihilist.

    I would say more exactly an archetypal hedonistic nihilist. Which is absolutely natural for people that have renounced all metaphysics. They don’t see anything beyond matter, they live, die and decay as matter does. And while they do, they try to have fun to forget that there is an end to it all.

    • Replies: @Barbarossa
    @Bashibuzuk

    Thanks, that's a good term. I'll add it to my repertoire!

    I haven't read Thus Spoke Zarathustra yet but I probably should. It sounds as if I'd be very much in agreement in some terms, though the idea of the will to power as the aspirational motive force seems crude.

  675. I wonder if the Russians might burrow a one way tunnel under the Dneiper around Kherson or under that Dam in New Kakovka? It wouldn’t have to be dug very far to work quite well.

  676. @Sean
    @A123


    “I do think that we have to get to a point, and this is where we do disagree, we’ve got to stop the money spigot to Ukraine eventually,” said J.D. Vance, the venture capitalist and author who’s in a close race for a US Senate seat in Ohio

     

    It's obtuse of Vance to publicly those things' effect are going have on the Kremlin's will to keep on fighting for a clear victory. Vance is performing well below expectation in foreign policy just as he is in his unexpectedly close Ohio senate election. Putin will never compromise without being enticed with the prospect of something he can present as a victory on Russia while at the same time as he is confronted with a scenario of something really bad happening unless he stops while he is ahead. Russia is planning something their General Staff are likely preparing for a literally redoubled offensive using twice the number of troops and plenty of equipment being brought from ever corner of Russia to be in Odessa for Orthodox Christmas.

    Not-The-President Biden cannot obtain the necessary Authorization for Use of Military Force [AUMF] for direct involvement in Ukraine. Without an AUMF, there is no U.S.-Russia fight to prepare for.
     
    There is a lot the US can and will do without actually becoming a combatant. Poland and Romania already have the Army Tactical Missile System, they could give it to Ukraine with tacit permission from the US. Ukraine is going to get it eventually


    Putin triumphant in Ukraine would be making all sorts of demands encroaching on full Nato members such as the withdrawal of US troops ad missile bases from countries like Latvia and even Poland. Please don't try an tell me Putin wouldn't because he'd be satisfied. No and recession of America' sphere of influence in East Europe would draw Russia into more and more risky gambits. There would be a need for a huge US build in Europe matching one by European counties especially Germany (which has the money) to stop him getting any funny ideas. Withdrawing militarily is not an option for the US; their economy is dependent on trade with Europe.

    Replies: @A123

    if Russia gets any kind of a win out of Ukraine … [the U.S.] would have to seriously prepare to fight Russia.

    Not-The-President Biden cannot obtain the necessary Authorization for Use of Military Force [AUMF] for direct involvement in Ukraine. Without an AUMF, there is no U.S.-Russia fight to prepare for.


    There is a lot the US can and will do without actually becoming a combatant.

    That is a 180° about face of your prior stance. Which is your position — The U.S. will be:

    • In direct, “serious” combat with Russia
    • Not actually become a combatant, no “serious” combat with Russia

    You cannot have it both ways.
    ___

    The Ukraine is geographically expansive. Assimilating 1/2 to 1/3 (or even 1/4) of that land will keep Russia busy for years.

    Don’t try an tell me Putin will push further. Your idea that this is the first domino in a cascade of multiple nations is absurd, inconceivable, and wholly ludicrous.

    PEACE 😇

    • Replies: @Sean
    @A123


    Don’t try an tell me Putin will push further.
     
    Just before the invasion Putin gave his demands to call it off, and these concerned the removal of certain Nato bases in Poland and other current full members of Nato. So letting him get what he could call a win would give him far more weight in the aforementioned demands.

    Which is your position — The U.S. will be:

    • In direct, “serious” combat with Russia
    • Not actually become a combatant, no “serious” combat with Russia
     

    Ukraine is the last place that America would chose to fight Russia even indirectly. However, America has to do something and supplying arms is relatively cheap, and has been astoundingly effective. I cannot see the US or Russia engaging in direct hostilities. It suits both to fight each other in proxy wars in other people's countries. Direct America-Russia conventional hostilities woud be to clear a path to the first rung of the thermonuclear weapon ladder up to a strategic exchange of specimen strikes hitting Los Angeles and St Petersburg .
  677. @Mikel
    @Beckow


    That’s not an answer to my question
     
    That's a perfectly valid answer to your question. Just not the one you have decided in advance to be the only correct one so you won't bother considering its merits, which makes a discussion with you on this topic pointless.

    Silviosilver beat me to it but 10 months ago you were not here predicting that Russia would invade because it just had no other choice. Like basically everyone at the time, you surely didn't think Putin would take such an extreme measure as a full invasion of Ukraine. You really come across as someone who will always defend anything Russia does, be it one thing or the opposite.

    The comparison with what other "big countries" would do in Russia's position (just the US really, the rest are second fiddles) doesn't fly with me at all. I'm actually trying to hold Russia to the same standards as I hold the US, where I supported a MAGA movement that was also supposed to concentrate on economic development and abandon foreign military interventions and commitments (before his leader forgot what platform he had won the election with). This movement continues to have plenty of popular support in the US btw and we may one day see it applying those policies in earnest but perhaps it is you who thinks that Russians are too primitive to follow such a civilized course of action.

    I happen to be in favor of the right to secession in almost all circumstances so in my view Russian and other ethnic minorities that ended on the wrong side of the post-USSR borders should be allowed to join whichever state of their liking in properly held referendums. But there are countless countries in the world with ethnic diasporas scattered in neighboring countries (among them some big ones like China or Germany) and they don't go invading their neighbors anymore. Russia has the choice of being just like any of these countries, no more no less.

    The idea that Ukraine possibly joining NATO and oppressing the Russian language left Russia with no choice but to start a war where NATO has enlarged to two additional neighbors, de facto now operates in Ukraine like never before and many more innocent Russophone civilians are being killed by Russia itself than Ukraine ever did is just ridiculous. Western countries' euphemism of "collateral damage" never referred to the killing of their own civilians, btw, which they never did. This war has been a total disaster, even from the perspective of what Russia was supposed to achieve. We are all much worse off because of it, including yourself, but for some strange reason you feel the need to support it.

    Replies: @A123, @Beckow, @Wokechoke, @Philip Owen

    I expected a war between the US/UK and Russia over Crimea as far back as 2014. I expected a war after chatting with some American US embassy workers from Moscow Embassy. I think the UK tried to trigger a was with HMS Defender. Who’s to say that caper wasn’t the final straw?

  678. @Bashibuzuk
    @LatW


    Тысячелетнее подавление нашей божественности,
     
    Tat tvam asi.

    By twisting a bit the Church Slavonic we might come to a highly similar Тут твой еси.

    The Theosis Mr Hack is so fond of (and rightly so) in Orthodox Christian theology is most probably an Indo-European theological concept (to use the politically correct terminology and avoid the most evil Ar. word).

    When your Highest God is named Brahman and your priestly Varna is called Brahmin you can easily see what were the Priestly caste ultimate aspirations.

    And all these complex Neoplatonicist emanations are oddly similar to some of the Upanishad theological speculations (or if one preferred, experimental findings through meditation).

    At the time of Sts Cyril and Methodius, the Byzantine chronists wrote that "despite being pagan" Slavs recognized a higher God above all other minor gods of their pantheon. Of course they did, they were at the time very close to the archaic form of Indo-European (yeah I know...) religious tradition which has formed in Central Europe during the Unetice Culture period during which Bell Beaker and Corded Ware cultures intermixed.

    At that time a single cultural ans spiritual space united Y haplogroups R1a, R1b and I populations, forming the majority of current European genetic populations. It was around 4000 years ago, before the Hittites moved South-East and entered the Middle East including modern day Palestine/Israel. Before Arkaim-Sintashta people entered BAMAC territory and then invaded Northern Hindustan.
    And well before Abraham (a brahman?) made the sudden discovery of a personal God.

    And yeah, a cross is just a simplified and static swastika. Although both are of course a solar symbol (among other things). And Sun it is a-rising when summer comes.

    😉



    https://youtu.be/f2xl-RJBXVc

    I could add that Buddha was originally described as "blue eyed and golden hued", descended from the mythical Sun Dynasty, and his clans' name was very close to the name given to the main branch of Central Asian Scythians.

    No surprise Buddhists cherish swastika to this very day as an auspicious symbol.

    And yeah: Hindu = Vend(u) after a couple of thousand years of pronunciation deformation. After all, to this very day Lithuanian is the closest language to Sanskrit, while 45% of Russian words from the Vologda region dialect have direct lexical cognates with Sanskrit as well. Imagine how close our languages might have been in Unetice times.

    🙂

    Replies: @Seraphim

    Have you heard of the Hindu teaching of the Avatara?

    • Replies: @Bashibuzuk
    @Seraphim

    Why are you asking me this, Vlakh ?

    Replies: @Seraphim

  679. @Beckow
    @Mikel


    ...Russia had the incomparably better choice of continuing to develop economically, trying to improve relations with everybody and maintain or enlarge the formidable security umbrella that it already had, with the largest nuclear arsenal in the world.
     
    That's not an answer to my question, that is a generic high-level evasive non-answer. My question was what was Russia supposed to do about Nato moving into Ukraine and Kiev government (and obviously a large part of Ukie society) suppressing the rights of Russians in Ukraine, closing schools, banning Russian in offices, bombing them.

    That is the question and not some economic development or having nukes. Your answer amounts to telling Russia to do nothing. They couldn't do nothing - the specific situation in Ukraine that lasted for 8 years was not something any large country - and many smaller ones - could ignore.

    Both the issue of Nato moving into Ukraine and the suppression of Russians were well documented and discussed for years. It was an attempt by the West to dare Russia to do something. They either thought Russia was bluffing or they actually welcome the war. So we have a war, but to pretend that Russia had another rational choice is foolish. Doing nothing as you suggest was not an option. It wouldn't be for US, China, France, UK, in the similar circumstances.

    Try again, this time with an actual answer.

    Replies: @silviosilver, @Mikel, @Philip Owen

    NATO didn’t move into Ukraine.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @Philip Owen

    “In total, 330 airplanes and 167 helicopters, 2,414 unmanned aerial vehicles, 384 air defence missile systems, 6,270 tanks and other armoured combat vehicles, 881 combat vehicles equipped with MLRS, 3,544 field artillery cannons and mortars, as well as 6,967 units of special military equipment have been destroyed during the special military operation.”


    If these Russian claims are true, then NATO was sucked into the void. NATO abhors a void.

    Replies: @Johnny Rico

  680. @Emil Nikola Richard
    https://braveneweurope.com/michael-hudson-germanys-position-in-americas-new-world-order

    Replies: @A123

    That article appeared here, and I have already issued the necessary correction. It should read: (1)

    America’s Subservient Position in Germany’s New World Order

    Under Not-The-President Biden, America could not lead Hunter to a brothel. The idea that the U.S. controls “world order” is mind boggling.

    If you believe that Not-The-President Biden’s regime is leading:

    — Name three members of the current administration that have international credibility!
    — How about even one?

    Yea. verily. The globe rallies behind Victoria Nuland…. Waaaait a sec… Nope… Not gonna happen…

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://www.unz.com/mhudson/germanys-position-in-americas-new-world-order/#comment-5637642

    • Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
    @A123

    Germany's New World Order is going to be looking pretty fuxor'd for Germans when they get their heating bills in February and March.

    Replies: @A123

  681. @Mr. Hack
    @QCIC

    I came across the video quite accidentally on YouTube. I haven't actually read the paper in any language, but thought that the video did a good job of summarising and including quotes from the paper.


    His ability to publish what was summarized in the video suggests the Russian press is more free than some commenters would have us believe 🙂
     
    I'd have to agree with you. As I originally pointed out:

    I actually can’t believe that his report (or Inozemtsev himself) wasn’t buried somewhere.

     

    I understand that things come hard and fast at this blogsite, so I'm going to reprint the YouTube clip to see if anybody else here knows anything about Inozemtsev:

    https://youtu.be/QMRn7jx7JqA

    Replies: @Philip Owen

    This blog is more than the presenter. The research that goes into these videos is considerable. At the least someone is researching in the Russian language. I use an AI to filter Russian language website stories for news relevant to trade and investment. I screen 500 stories a day. This is on an even bigger scale and the video scripts are written and recorded as well. He has also been carefully selected as a presesnter, well spoken with a Northern (trustworthy) accent.

    • Thanks: Mr. Hack
  682. @Bashibuzuk
    @Barbarossa


    The last man (German: Letzter Mensch) is a term used by the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche in Thus Spoke Zarathustra to describe the antithesis of his theorized superior being, the Übermensch, whose imminent appearance is heralded by Zarathustra. The last man is the archetypal passive nihilist.
     
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Last_man#:~:text=The%20last%20man%20(German%3A%20Letzter,is%20the%20archetypal%20passive%20nihilist.

    I would say more exactly an archetypal hedonistic nihilist. Which is absolutely natural for people that have renounced all metaphysics. They don't see anything beyond matter, they live, die and decay as matter does. And while they do, they try to have fun to forget that there is an end to it all.

    Replies: @Barbarossa

    Thanks, that’s a good term. I’ll add it to my repertoire!

    I haven’t read Thus Spoke Zarathustra yet but I probably should. It sounds as if I’d be very much in agreement in some terms, though the idea of the will to power as the aspirational motive force seems crude.

  683. Netanyahu’s Center-Right coalition, based on common sense domestic security and foreign policy, is projected to have enough seats to form a new government. (1)

     

     

     
    If Labour/Gesher falls below the four seat minimum, the situation could improve further.

    Obviously, the results are not final until certified and the official count will likely be released on late Friday. That being said, there does not seem to be any way to stop Netanyahu.

    PEACE 😇
    ________

    (1) https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2022/11/the-daily-chart-special-bonus-israeli-election-edition.php

  684. @Seraphim
    @Bashibuzuk

    Have you heard of the Hindu teaching of the Avatara?

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

    Why are you asking me this, Vlakh ?

    • Replies: @Seraphim
    @Bashibuzuk

    Because 'Theosis' in Orthodox Christian theology is not an 'Indo-European' theological concept, but the finality of the Incarnation, Passion and Resurrection of the Supreme Avatara, the Word of God.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

  685. @Philip Owen
    @Beckow

    NATO didn't move into Ukraine.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    “In total, 330 airplanes and 167 helicopters, 2,414 unmanned aerial vehicles, 384 air defence missile systems, 6,270 tanks and other armoured combat vehicles, 881 combat vehicles equipped with MLRS, 3,544 field artillery cannons and mortars, as well as 6,967 units of special military equipment have been destroyed during the special military operation.”

    If these Russian claims are true, then NATO was sucked into the void. NATO abhors a void.

    • Replies: @Johnny Rico
    @Wokechoke

    And what if they are not true? What does that say?

    Replies: @Wokechoke

  686. @Mikel
    @Beckow


    That’s not an answer to my question
     
    That's a perfectly valid answer to your question. Just not the one you have decided in advance to be the only correct one so you won't bother considering its merits, which makes a discussion with you on this topic pointless.

    Silviosilver beat me to it but 10 months ago you were not here predicting that Russia would invade because it just had no other choice. Like basically everyone at the time, you surely didn't think Putin would take such an extreme measure as a full invasion of Ukraine. You really come across as someone who will always defend anything Russia does, be it one thing or the opposite.

    The comparison with what other "big countries" would do in Russia's position (just the US really, the rest are second fiddles) doesn't fly with me at all. I'm actually trying to hold Russia to the same standards as I hold the US, where I supported a MAGA movement that was also supposed to concentrate on economic development and abandon foreign military interventions and commitments (before his leader forgot what platform he had won the election with). This movement continues to have plenty of popular support in the US btw and we may one day see it applying those policies in earnest but perhaps it is you who thinks that Russians are too primitive to follow such a civilized course of action.

    I happen to be in favor of the right to secession in almost all circumstances so in my view Russian and other ethnic minorities that ended on the wrong side of the post-USSR borders should be allowed to join whichever state of their liking in properly held referendums. But there are countless countries in the world with ethnic diasporas scattered in neighboring countries (among them some big ones like China or Germany) and they don't go invading their neighbors anymore. Russia has the choice of being just like any of these countries, no more no less.

    The idea that Ukraine possibly joining NATO and oppressing the Russian language left Russia with no choice but to start a war where NATO has enlarged to two additional neighbors, de facto now operates in Ukraine like never before and many more innocent Russophone civilians are being killed by Russia itself than Ukraine ever did is just ridiculous. Western countries' euphemism of "collateral damage" never referred to the killing of their own civilians, btw, which they never did. This war has been a total disaster, even from the perspective of what Russia was supposed to achieve. We are all much worse off because of it, including yourself, but for some strange reason you feel the need to support it.

    Replies: @A123, @Beckow, @Wokechoke, @Philip Owen

    NATO was an irrelevance and only discussed because of Stavka paranoia. The UK and the US are the relevant parties without any refence to NATO. They had obligations under the Budapest Memorandum to assist Ukraine maintain its sovereignty against Russian invasion. The Russian proxy invasions of 2014 were unexpected so there had been no preparation.

    After 2014, the UK and US trained and equipped Ukraine to fight a Partizan war. So only infantry weapons were supplied. NLAWS, Javelins, sniper rifles. They did not expect Ukraine to prevail against a full scale Russian invasion. The Russian defeat at the battle of Kiev was a surpise both as an event and in terms of the scale of the Russian rout. There is now an effort to ramp up Ukrainian capability with heavier weapons and more adanced training. Urban warfare at night in my direct observation – winter is coming. There is still no NATO intervention in Ukraine or short term prospect of Ukraine joining NATO. The Eastern Europeans of course now support Ukraine out of shared memories of colonization by Russia. The Germans and the French because they know the side with which they need to maintain good relations. Also, better for Ukraine to defeat Russia (greater humiliation for the regime). Even so, if Russia downs a Turkish ship NATO will be involved.

    This war is completely down to the FSB’ and Stavka’s imperialist urge to genocide Ukrainian identity. The intention has been there since at least the time of Nicholas 1 who tried with Poland first.

    • Replies: @Mikel
    @Philip Owen


    There is still no NATO intervention in Ukraine
     
    Well yes, if we exclude the $40+ billion military aid sent (similar to the total Russian annual military budget), the training of Ukrainian troops, the provision of real time intelligence and the more than likely US and UK boots on the ground (not counting the many volunteers with NATO military training fighting along with the Ukrainians) then you are right, there's no NATO intervention in Ukraine.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Philip Owen

    , @LondonBob
    @Philip Owen

    No, NATO thought Russia hadn't assembled enough forces to invade successfully, of course Russia didn't invade to conquer, they invaded to assist the Donbass and force a diplomatic settlement. They then thought the Russian economy would collapse after sanctions and Russia would be diplomatically isolated, it didn't work out. Russia has gone on far longer than the neocons planned, and Russia has destroyed so much of the Soviet era weaponry they have been forced to supply more than they ever thought necessary.

    Replies: @Philip Owen

  687. @A123
    @Emil Nikola Richard

    That article appeared here, and I have already issued the necessary correction. It should read: (1)

    America's Subservient Position in Germany's New World Order

    Under Not-The-President Biden, America could not lead Hunter to a brothel. The idea that the U.S. controls "world order" is mind boggling.

    If you believe that Not-The-President Biden's regime is leading:

    -- Name three members of the current administration that have international credibility!
    -- How about even one?

    Yea. verily. The globe rallies behind Victoria Nuland.... Waaaait a sec... Nope... Not gonna happen...

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://www.unz.com/mhudson/germanys-position-in-americas-new-world-order/#comment-5637642

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard

    Germany’s New World Order is going to be looking pretty fuxor’d for Germans when they get their heating bills in February and March.

    • Replies: @A123
    @Emil Nikola Richard


    Germany’s New World Order is going to be looking pretty fuxor’d for Germans when they get their heating bills in February and March.
     
    The German Green Party has indeed created energy FUBAR.

    Key point -- This is a 100% European (totally U.S. free) FUBAR. The Germans did this to themselves. They also dragged down other countries with them.

    The only reason the German Greens could not order Not-The-President Biden to totally shaft America on the European WEF's behalf... Insufficient LNG export terminal capacity and a shortage of vessels.

    PEACE 😇

  688. @Wokechoke
    @Philip Owen

    “In total, 330 airplanes and 167 helicopters, 2,414 unmanned aerial vehicles, 384 air defence missile systems, 6,270 tanks and other armoured combat vehicles, 881 combat vehicles equipped with MLRS, 3,544 field artillery cannons and mortars, as well as 6,967 units of special military equipment have been destroyed during the special military operation.”


    If these Russian claims are true, then NATO was sucked into the void. NATO abhors a void.

    Replies: @Johnny Rico

    And what if they are not true? What does that say?

    • Agree: Sean
    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @Johnny Rico

    It’s credible enough that the Russians have eliminated the equivalent number of a couple or three major NATO military establishments. The British themselves only have 250 Challenger tanks.


    https://www.forbes.com/sites/vikrammittal/2022/11/01/electronic-warfare-will-play-large-role-in-the-battle-for-kherson/?sh=56b4fb9e209a


    Forbes is expecting a knockdown drag out fight for KhersonCity. An uninhabitable battlefield, or a sort of electro-military dystopia.


    Should be morbidly fascinating to see if there’s such a battle.

  689. @Emil Nikola Richard
    @A123

    Germany's New World Order is going to be looking pretty fuxor'd for Germans when they get their heating bills in February and March.

    Replies: @A123

    Germany’s New World Order is going to be looking pretty fuxor’d for Germans when they get their heating bills in February and March.

    The German Green Party has indeed created energy FUBAR.

    Key point — This is a 100% European (totally U.S. free) FUBAR. The Germans did this to themselves. They also dragged down other countries with them.

    The only reason the German Greens could not order Not-The-President Biden to totally shaft America on the European WEF’s behalf… Insufficient LNG export terminal capacity and a shortage of vessels.

    PEACE 😇

  690. I am noticing thread instability and slowness, and I reported it here:

    https://www.unz.com/announcement/bugs-suggestions-2/?showcomments#comment-5634414

    If anyone is also having issues, please follow up in the official “site bugs & issues” thread.

    PEACE 😇

  691. @Johnny Rico
    @Wokechoke

    And what if they are not true? What does that say?

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    It’s credible enough that the Russians have eliminated the equivalent number of a couple or three major NATO military establishments. The British themselves only have 250 Challenger tanks.

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/vikrammittal/2022/11/01/electronic-warfare-will-play-large-role-in-the-battle-for-kherson/?sh=56b4fb9e209a

    Forbes is expecting a knockdown drag out fight for KhersonCity. An uninhabitable battlefield, or a sort of electro-military dystopia.

    Should be morbidly fascinating to see if there’s such a battle.

  692. @Beckow
    @Mikel


    ...In the long run, it would have worked much better for Russia’s security and the treatment of its co-ethnics abroad.
     
    How long? Decades? Centuries? We live now. It was now that the co-ethnics were oppressed (and many killed), it was now that Nato was openly turning Ukraine into a military forward base to threaten Russia: bases, training, weapons, crazy rhetoric.

    Yes, a country can always do nothing - and I would do - but I understand why Russia finally moved. The logic of threats is that security people are paid to take them seriously - they will exaggerate and go paranoid. It is to Russia's credit that they stayed patient for the last 8 years and were actively looking for a compromise, pleading with the West to let the insane 'Ukraine in Nato' plan go. Who would that hurt?

    But Nato couldn't, their existence is based on doing something. Russia is there, it looks vulnerable, why not go as far as the crazy nervous neo-con chickens can dream? It is no skin of their back, they are not at risk, they make great living. It feeds them emotionally: the sense of importance, masters of the universe, movies will be made.


    the defense of Russian speakers in Ukraine has even gone worse.
     
    The ones who survive may not see it that way. They are now in the center: they will either be eliminated in various ways or they will come out on top. War is hell, it is defined by killing, once it started, why complain?

    You and I disagree on the outcome of the war so far and there is no way to settle it, it is too early. It may turn out that one is right, or not, or something completely else will happen. Since we are at beginning, my bet is on something else. We will see.


    go to extraordinary lengths to explain how Putin had “no choice” but start and maintain this bloodbath.
     
    To explain is why we are here. Do you prefer not to know or understand? The other side has a point of view, that's why there is a war. The facile dismissals don't help. There is no contradiction between trying to understand and wanting peace. Probably the opposite.

    My not-very-thoughtful position has been consistent: let go of Crimea, take the Minsk deal and freeze or cancel Ukraine in Nato. I underestimated the emotions and intensity on all sides and turned out to be wrong. But there must a way out of this that doesn't destroy the region - one thing I care about. Maybe I realized earlier than others that for Russia doing nothing was not an option. Now I sense that losing is not an option. The problem it is not an option for the West either.

    Replies: @Mikel

    There is no contradiction between trying to understand and wanting peace.

    When you claim once and again that Putin had no choice but to start this catastrophic war you are obviously going beyond just trying to understand. That would be like me saying that NATO had no other choice but to depose Gadhafi or bomb Yugoslavia, although they shouldn’t have really done it.

    You are right that listening to what the Russians say is essential to try to understand what is going on and how this is likely to evolve. That’s why I personally get most of my information about this war from Russian sources. But to be honest, it’s not a great mystery why Putin decided to invade Ukraine if we pay attention to what he said and did in the past years. Because he wanted Russia to be treated like a big superpower with its own sphere of influence again, because he thought that Russia had achieved a much bigger level of military power than it really had and because he was obviously willing to cause massive casualties and damage to civilians in pursuit of his goals. You don’t invade a big country like Ukraine and try to remove its military and militias from highly populated cities if you are not willing to kill many innocent civilians. Even when the Donbass militias went on the offensive against the weak Ukrainian army in 2015 they couldn’t help killing civilians in Gorlovka, Volnovakha, Mariupol, etc. That was always part of his macabre calculation, even if he thought that the survivors would eventually be better off under Russian rule in case he cares about such things.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @Mikel

    It’s more to do with Crimea being a Russian fortress.

    , @Beckow
    @Mikel


    ...no choice but to start this catastrophic war
     
    It is not my 'claim', I explained what the security situation looked like from their point of view. You didn't address it, instead you said that 'doing nothing' would have been better. You fail to provide an example when a major power in the same situation would do nothing.

    like me saying that NATO had no other choice but to depose Gadhafi or bomb Yugoslavia
     
    You can say whatever you wish, but it is on its face a meaningless comparison regarding security. Even theoretical claims by Nato for threats from Yugoslavia and Libya (or Iraq, Syria) were an order of magnitude less serious and they were largely made up. There is no real comparison: Nato was actively moving into Ukraine and they were not going there to play bocce-ball with the locals. Finally address that point - all else is noise.

    obviously willing to cause massive casualties and damage to civilians in pursuit of his goals.
     
    Big countries are like that. Nato caused massive casualties and damage to civilian infrastructure with not a peep from the official Western media, literati or anyone who matters. Ok, some peeps, but in a tightly controlled environment. About the same as the anti-war demos in Russia now.

    The catastrophic hubris of Nato claiming that they can do whatever they dream off, bomb, kill, lie, occupy, build bases, change borders, etc...is the root cause of this war. No rational observer believes that without Nato destruction of Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya...this war would be taking place. Do you understand the meaning of a 'precedent'?

    Let's see who wins, but it is too late for anyone in the West to belly-ache that 'wars are bloody'. Yes, they are, Nato has shown us again and again. I recall they were rewarded.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Mikel

  693. @Philip Owen
    @Mikel

    NATO was an irrelevance and only discussed because of Stavka paranoia. The UK and the US are the relevant parties without any refence to NATO. They had obligations under the Budapest Memorandum to assist Ukraine maintain its sovereignty against Russian invasion. The Russian proxy invasions of 2014 were unexpected so there had been no preparation.

    After 2014, the UK and US trained and equipped Ukraine to fight a Partizan war. So only infantry weapons were supplied. NLAWS, Javelins, sniper rifles. They did not expect Ukraine to prevail against a full scale Russian invasion. The Russian defeat at the battle of Kiev was a surpise both as an event and in terms of the scale of the Russian rout. There is now an effort to ramp up Ukrainian capability with heavier weapons and more adanced training. Urban warfare at night in my direct observation - winter is coming. There is still no NATO intervention in Ukraine or short term prospect of Ukraine joining NATO. The Eastern Europeans of course now support Ukraine out of shared memories of colonization by Russia. The Germans and the French because they know the side with which they need to maintain good relations. Also, better for Ukraine to defeat Russia (greater humiliation for the regime). Even so, if Russia downs a Turkish ship NATO will be involved.

    This war is completely down to the FSB' and Stavka's imperialist urge to genocide Ukrainian identity. The intention has been there since at least the time of Nicholas 1 who tried with Poland first.

    Replies: @Mikel, @LondonBob

    There is still no NATO intervention in Ukraine

    Well yes, if we exclude the $40+ billion military aid sent (similar to the total Russian annual military budget), the training of Ukrainian troops, the provision of real time intelligence and the more than likely US and UK boots on the ground (not counting the many volunteers with NATO military training fighting along with the Ukrainians) then you are right, there’s no NATO intervention in Ukraine.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @Mikel

    Assessing from an Olympian height the Russians have erased the deep reserves of gear found in NATO arsenals. The Russian claims of equipment lost by Ukraine even if you divide by .5 or .1 are horrific by a Western European standards.

    They claim 6,500 APC AFV MBT etc destroyed, divide by 2 and it’s still 3,000. ~ divide by 10 and it’s 600. Clean out the armouries and motor pools.


    They claim 800 MLRS type vehicles destroyed.

    The tricky part is that Russia invaded with far too few infantry. So they look feeble in terms of keeping ground.

    Replies: @Mikel, @LondonBob

    , @Philip Owen
    @Mikel

    That's not NATO. That's the US and UK fulfilling their Budapest Memorandum obligations as Russia knew they should.

    Russia claims 83 HIMARS destroyed. The US sent 14 with 2 more later. Just perhaps, Ukrainian is using dummies?

  694. @Mikel
    @Beckow


    There is no contradiction between trying to understand and wanting peace.
     
    When you claim once and again that Putin had no choice but to start this catastrophic war you are obviously going beyond just trying to understand. That would be like me saying that NATO had no other choice but to depose Gadhafi or bomb Yugoslavia, although they shouldn't have really done it.

    You are right that listening to what the Russians say is essential to try to understand what is going on and how this is likely to evolve. That's why I personally get most of my information about this war from Russian sources. But to be honest, it's not a great mystery why Putin decided to invade Ukraine if we pay attention to what he said and did in the past years. Because he wanted Russia to be treated like a big superpower with its own sphere of influence again, because he thought that Russia had achieved a much bigger level of military power than it really had and because he was obviously willing to cause massive casualties and damage to civilians in pursuit of his goals. You don't invade a big country like Ukraine and try to remove its military and militias from highly populated cities if you are not willing to kill many innocent civilians. Even when the Donbass militias went on the offensive against the weak Ukrainian army in 2015 they couldn't help killing civilians in Gorlovka, Volnovakha, Mariupol, etc. That was always part of his macabre calculation, even if he thought that the survivors would eventually be better off under Russian rule in case he cares about such things.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Beckow

    It’s more to do with Crimea being a Russian fortress.

  695. @Mikel
    @Philip Owen


    There is still no NATO intervention in Ukraine
     
    Well yes, if we exclude the $40+ billion military aid sent (similar to the total Russian annual military budget), the training of Ukrainian troops, the provision of real time intelligence and the more than likely US and UK boots on the ground (not counting the many volunteers with NATO military training fighting along with the Ukrainians) then you are right, there's no NATO intervention in Ukraine.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Philip Owen

    Assessing from an Olympian height the Russians have erased the deep reserves of gear found in NATO arsenals. The Russian claims of equipment lost by Ukraine even if you divide by .5 or .1 are horrific by a Western European standards.

    They claim 6,500 APC AFV MBT etc destroyed, divide by 2 and it’s still 3,000. ~ divide by 10 and it’s 600. Clean out the armouries and motor pools.

    They claim 800 MLRS type vehicles destroyed.

    The tricky part is that Russia invaded with far too few infantry. So they look feeble in terms of keeping ground.

    • Replies: @Mikel
    @Wokechoke


    The tricky part is that Russia invaded with far too few infantry. So they look feeble in terms of keeping ground.
     
    It's more than that. They finally took Mariupol at an immense cost against a totally sorrounded enemy. But now they lack the ability to take Bakhmut or Soledar.

    Replies: @LatW, @LondonBob, @QCIC

    , @LondonBob
    @Wokechoke

    T55s from Slovenia now.

  696. Tat tvam asi.

    By twisting a bit the Church Slavonic we might come to a highly similar Тут твой еси.

    Of course. It’s very similar in the Baltic languages. The Russians used to have “esi” (now they have just есть), the Balts still have it. I am – es esmu, aš esu. (lat, lith).

    [MORE]

    Another interesting phrase of a mysterious origin is “аз есмь царь”. I am the Lord. It is almost identical to Latvian. It is a phrase used in the Gospel, by Jesus apparently. “I am the essence (of being)”. “I am King”. I’m still trying to figure out the origins of it (apparently, one had to be careful naming it, not to wear the Lord’s name in vein?), it must be just Old Slavic language. But if so, then they may have spoken that way daily at some point which is identical to my language.

    When your Highest God is named Brahman and your priestly Varna is called Brahmin you can easily see what were the Priestly caste ultimate aspirations.

    James Frazer in The Golden Bough refers to a universal, “dying and re-birthing” fertility deity that could be viewed as a sacred king.

    Slavs recognized a higher God above all other minor gods of their pantheon.

    The Balts have Dievs, Dievas (in masculine) Who is above and beyond everyone else but Who is also near us. Similar to the Indo-European Father Sky (Zeus). Related to “daylight”, “day” (diena, день, lat, rus – “day”).

    to this very day Lithuanian is the closest language to Sanskrit, while 45% of Russian words from the Vologda region dialect have direct lexical cognates with Sanskrit as well.

    There’s something special about Vologda. There is the special gene there and now you’re saying the language connection, too. It has a kind of a northern feel, yet it is still very green, with lakes. It’s the kind of environment my people like a lot.

    Imagine how close our languages might have been in Unetice times.

    Yea, it’s fascinating. I wish I could hear it. When I first started learning Ukrainian, I was totally tripping out listening to Ukrainian being sung, it felt like there were moments when someone spoke to me in a language that felt very familiar on a deeper level.

    The Brahmin rode up, gathered on the high hill,
    They hung their swords* on the sacred tree.

    (Ancient Latvian poem).

    * warrior priests?

    • Replies: @Bashibuzuk
    @LatW

    In Old Slavonic they would have said "Аз есмь". Which anyone who would have read the Bible and the Gospels in Russian would immediately recognize.


    Итак, если Господь есть Тот, Кто поистине существует, то что же есть человек сам по себе? Это нам показал апостол Петр в своем ответе служанке первосвященника. После взятия Христа под стражу ближайший ученик впадает в состояние, которое на языке православных молитв называется «окамененным нечувствием». Пред читателем Евангелия предстает человек, который хочет скрыться, остаться неузнанным, возможно даже – исчезнуть, испариться, аннигилироваться, одним словом – не быть.
     

    Бог есть Сущий. Он имеет жизнь в Самом Себе (Ин. 5,26). Человек, как и весь мир, создан из ничего и не имеет автономного источника существования. Он существует только в меру причастности к Богу. Вне Бога – вне жизни. Если человек не утверждается на незыблемом фундаменте божественного Аз есмь, он не только соскальзывает в бездну небытия, в бездну своего изначального ничто. Он не может даже дать внятное обоснование своему собственному существованию, которое представляется в этом случае лишь игралищем стихий. В этом случае нельзя найти никаких серьезных доводов в подтверждение реального личностного существования.

     

    https://pravoslavie.ru/95624.html

    Finally, I am reassured: I am far more Orthodox that I would have thought. I am perhaps closer to Our Lord than some Church-going people. Why ? Because I know that Tat tvam asi, while their priests made this knowledge a taboo and have inserted themselves between the man and his God as a kind of metaphysical Firewall.

    And yeah, interesting that in Islam, Ibn Al Arabi al Andalusi, one of the greatest Sufi thinkers, who was niknamed the Shaykh al Akbar - the Greatest (spiritual) Leader, but also Ibn Alaflatun - The (spiritual) son/descendant of Plato, has said of God: "Allahuma kulyat el woojood", literally: "The Highest God is the fulness / completeness of Existence". What can be clearer than that ? What can be closer to the Advaita Vedanta that is probably the highest metaphysics of the "Indo-Europeans" (euphemism to avoid the Ar. word) ?

    Now, about Vologda:

    Древнеиндийские тексты повествуют, что на прародине, где много лесов и озер, находятся священные горы, которые делят землю на север и юг, а реки - на текущие к северу и текущие к югу. Река, текущая в южное море, называется Ра (это Волга). А та, что впадает в молочное или Белое море - это Двина (что на санскрите означает "двойная"). У Северной Двины и в самом деле нет своего истока - она возникает от слияния двух рек: Юга и Сухоны. А священные горы из древнеиндийского эпоса очень похожи по описанию на главный водораздел восточной Европы - Северные Увалы, эту гигантскую дугу из возвышенностей, пролегшую от Валдая на северо-восток до полярного Урала.

    Судя по исследованиям палеоклиматологов, в те времена, о которых повествуют "Веды", средне зимняя температура на побережье Ледовитого океана была на 12 градусов выше, чем сейчас. И жилось там в смысле климата не хуже, чем нынче в приатлантических зонах западной Европы. "Подавляющее большинство названий наших рек можно без коверканья языка просто переводить с санскрита, - рассказывает Светлана Жарникова. - Сухона означает "легко преодолимая", Кубена - "извилистая", Суда - "ручей", Дарида - "дающая воду", Падма - "лотос, кувшинка", Куша - "осока", Сямжена - "объединяющая людей". В Вологодской и Архангельской областях множество речек, озер и ручейков называются Ганг, Шива, Индига, Индосат, Синдошка, Индоманка. В моей книге тридцать страниц заняты этими названиями на санскрите. А сохраниться такие названия могут только в том случае - и это уже закон - если сохраняется народ, который дал эти названия. А если он исчезает, то и названия меняются".
     
    https://vk.com/@v_e_d_i-pochemu-vologodskii-govor-ne-nuzhdaetsya-v-perevode-na-sansk

    That is why it is not surprising in the slightest that Vologda people have kept until the 1930ies embroidering Swastikas on their traditional dress, and carving it on their homes. Until some GPU/NKVD (Semitic?) officials decided that it is "Fascist" and should be punished by sending those peasants who just clung to their thousands' years old traditions to the Death Camps. These peasants who again, not surprisingly were mostly Old Believers. When the GPU/NKVD scum finished their "scorching earth" policy there, for hundreds of kilometers villages stood empty in the Great Russian North.

    Immense wooden houses, so well suited for living in the boreal area. Built to last centuries on a land where free peasants who have never been enserfed, as the majority of those of the North have never been enslaved by the Romanov Czars and their henchmen, would live with their families. I have been in these forests, on the shores of these lakes until Onego and the White Sea and seen these old houses standing empty, their owners gone forever because an alien and toxic spirit has entered our land.

    From the Pavel Pryannikov's Telegram channel (Pryannikov's mom was a Jewish Moscovite, while his dad had a Northern Russian Old Believer ancestry)

    Читаю воспоминания Игоря Голомштока – известного советского диссидента. Уже писал кратко о нём. Он вырос в семье, где отчим и мать были «топ-менеджерами» НКВД – ГУЛАГа на Колыме. Вернулись они с Колымы в Москву в 1946 году. Голомшток окончил сразу два вуза – Финансовый институт и по искусствоведению.
    Голомшток оставил записи о жизни того самого номенклатурного либерал-чекизма, как раз формировавшегося в 1950-е, когда дети сталинских силовиков выбирали уже либерализм, а не дыбу.

    В 1951 году Голомшток стал инспектором банков в Москве. Его запись о своей работе:
    «В сферу моих обязанностей входило кредитование капитального строительства районных организаций — бань, прачечных, треста озеленения, треста очистки и пр. Говорят, что, в отличие от теперешнего российского беспредела, при Сталине был порядок. Какое там! Я должен был посещать подведомственные мне учреждения и проверять на месте использование средств, отпущенных на строительство. Чего только я там не насмотрелся! Деньги отпущены на сооружение оранжерей. Где оранжереи? «А мы, — говорят мне, — их сожгли». По платёжным ведомостям обнаруживалось, что зарплата продолжала поступать лицам, сидящим в тюрьме. Я понял, что кого-то придётся сажать и что, скорее всего, посаженным буду я. Надо было сматывать удочки, хотя ещё не истекли два обязательных года работы, положенные молодому специалисту после окончания института».

    В итоге Голомшток ведущим искусствоведом в Пушкинском музее. Он знакомится с московской богемой. В числе его друзей Майя Розанова (потом она станет Марией) и её муж писатель Синявский. Кстати, отчим Розановой был большой начальник в Политуправлении Пограничных войск Левитан. Здесь он описывает, как вместе с семейством Синявских-Розановых они в конце 1950-х добывали иконы и рукописные книги на Русском Севере:

    «Своё первое путешествие по реке Мезени Синявские совершили в 57-м году. На следующий год они пригласили с собой меня. В Москве мы приобрели лодочный мотор, в деревне где-то под Вологдой купили у рыбака старую лодку, и отправились вверх по течению Мезени.
    В верховьях реки на сотни километров виднелись по берегам брошенные деревни. В некоторых таких храмах ещё стояли древние разрозненные иконостасы, а части их и настенные иконы валялись на полу, покрытые толстым слоем птичьего помета. Майя очищала их от грязи и навоза, проводила ваткой со скипидаром по их черным поверхностям, и под ними часто проглядывало письмо XVI-XVII веков.

    В низовьях реки в деревнях еще обитала часть их прежнего населения, но и тут - пустые избы, церкви со сбитыми крестами, разрушенными куполами, сквозь которые дожди и снега, в зависимости от времени года, поливали и засыпали сохранившиеся в них доски с иконописью. Местное население использовало их для хозяйственных нужд. Иконами забивали дыры, на них рубили капусту, ими прикрывали бочки с соленьями (наш друг Коля Кишилов, работавший реставратором в Третьяковской галерее, в одной из деревень увидел окно, забитое иконой лицевой стороной наружу - под её глухой чёрной поверхностью обнаружился «Спас» XIII века).

    Главным интересом Андрея (Синявского) были не столько иконы, сколько книги. Когда-то жившие в этих местах старообрядцы устраивали в подвалах своих домов скрытни, в которых они занимались переписыванием книг. Один из таких скрытней Синявские обнаружили ещё во время их первого путешествия, и теперь они снова пришли сюда, захватив с собой и меня. Это было большое, во всю площадь избы, помещение без окон, с низким потолком, заваленное бумажной продукцией. Рукописные Жития, Апокрифы, старопечатные Библии, Четьи-Минеи, старообрядческие молитвенники — всё это кучами громоздилось на полу как ненужный хлам. Потомки этих книголюбов, ещё жившие в избе, никакого интереса к книгам не проявляли, ценности их не видели и использовали только как бумагу для цигарок. «За пятёрку — сколько унесешь!» Мы грузили эти сокровища в лодку, а потом, уже в крупных населенных пунктах в низовьях Мезени, Синявские по почте отправляли их в Москву к себе на Хлебный переулок».
     
    And they call us Orcs...

    Replies: @LatW

  697. @Wokechoke
    @Mikel

    Assessing from an Olympian height the Russians have erased the deep reserves of gear found in NATO arsenals. The Russian claims of equipment lost by Ukraine even if you divide by .5 or .1 are horrific by a Western European standards.

    They claim 6,500 APC AFV MBT etc destroyed, divide by 2 and it’s still 3,000. ~ divide by 10 and it’s 600. Clean out the armouries and motor pools.


    They claim 800 MLRS type vehicles destroyed.

    The tricky part is that Russia invaded with far too few infantry. So they look feeble in terms of keeping ground.

    Replies: @Mikel, @LondonBob

    The tricky part is that Russia invaded with far too few infantry. So they look feeble in terms of keeping ground.

    It’s more than that. They finally took Mariupol at an immense cost against a totally sorrounded enemy. But now they lack the ability to take Bakhmut or Soledar.

    • Replies: @LatW
    @Mikel

    It will be minus degrees at night either this or next week. And it just rained, so the soil is moist, cold. Not all of them are properly supplied, so it won't be easy for them.

    , @LondonBob
    @Mikel

    The Russians weren't supposed to take Mariupol at all, the NATO plan was to lure Russia in to bloody urban battles, hence all the anti tank guns, but the Russian disproved the old three to one to the attackers manpower superiority rule.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    , @QCIC
    @Mikel

    None of this matters once Ukraine capitulates.

  698. @Bashibuzuk
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    Have you ever had the possibility to read Lev Gumilyov's studies on the history of the Great Steppe nomads?

    And as a present to thank you for you kind explanation on the Han Chinese take on history of the Greater Chinese Realm (an expression I have just coined ad hoc) please have a look at this when you have some time to spend on long gone mighty tribes heritage:

    https://depts.washington.edu/silkroad/museums/shm/shmnoinula.html

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noin-Ula_burial_site

    https://indo-european.eu/2020/08/xiongnu-ancestry-connects-huns-avars-to-scytho-siberians/

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/89/Noin-Ula_carpet.jpg

    I would one day perhaps write about my own pet theories on the possible influence of Huns on the "historical coming out" of the Slav from "the Pripyat' closet". Of course, nothing scientific or proven and even less so official...

    🙂

    Replies: @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms

    Thanks. In official history Sima Qian’s Records of the Grand Historian (c. 91 BC), Xiongnu is said to have descended from the son of the last king of Xia dynasty. His name is probably a cognate of Chanyu.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chunwei

    Xia (c. 2070 BC–c. 1600 BC) is the first dynasty in official historiography and has not been verified by archeology and archeogenetics. So they may have been Eurasian nomads. They were also roughly contemporaneous with Yamnaya expansion.

    Xia got kicked out of Central Plains by Shang and became nomads again. This is the exact parallel of the Mongol Yuan getting kicked out of Central Plains by Ming, 2900 years later, retreating the steppes and founding the Northern Yuan.

    The Anglosphere gets hanged up on a sharp division between East and West Eurasians, but Eurasian nomads should have always been a mix of Europoid and Mongloid features, like Putin and Shoigu.

    I’m familiar with Gumilyov who’s gone beyond Chinese historians on studies of Eurasian nomads. I guess that made him persona non grata (?) because it offended ROC and PRC’s claim on Inner Asia territories. He’s done extensive work on Xianbei who has the same golden ornaments as Indo-Iranian Scythians, Yuechi, etc.https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Сяньби

    • Thanks: Emil Nikola Richard
    • Replies: @Bashibuzuk
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms


    The Anglosphere gets hanged up on a sharp division between East and West Eurasians, but Eurasian nomads should have always been a mix of Europoid and Mongloid features, like Putin and Shoigu.
     

    Xianbei who has the same golden ornaments as Indo-Iranian Scythians, Yuechi, etc.
     
    Yes I agree, they have intermixed since times immemorial. I mean, already by the times of the Botaï culture, there was a mixed Western Eurasian / Eastern Eurasian population. There is a haplogroup cline going West to East in Eurasia but it is thousand years old, well before the advent of the historically recorded populations.

    I basically prefer thinking of all that era in Central Asia / Southern Siberia as an interaction between three ancestral populations: Afanasievo folks (Yamnaya - descended, Y haplogroup R1b), Okunevo folks (ancestral to the Altaic - Extreme Oriental - Finno-Ugric, Y haplogroup Q and NO1) and Andronovo folks (Arian, Y haplogroup R1a).

    In Western Europe you add the Megalithic Culture folks (Y haplogroup I) and in Central and Southern Europe you add the neolithic farmer populations that came from Anatolia and Middle East (Y haplogroups E, G etc.).

    I am pretty much convinced that most people posting on UR are related to one of these ancestral populations.

    It is actually a shame that the official historiography everywhere is not properly teaching the past interactions of these Eurasian populations. If it would, perhaps we would be more open-minded towards people of other Eurasian cultures. But it's not surprising really, divide et impera has been, and still is the norm.
  699. @Mikel
    @Wokechoke


    The tricky part is that Russia invaded with far too few infantry. So they look feeble in terms of keeping ground.
     
    It's more than that. They finally took Mariupol at an immense cost against a totally sorrounded enemy. But now they lack the ability to take Bakhmut or Soledar.

    Replies: @LatW, @LondonBob, @QCIC

    It will be minus degrees at night either this or next week. And it just rained, so the soil is moist, cold. Not all of them are properly supplied, so it won’t be easy for them.

  700. @Bashibuzuk
    @Seraphim

    Why are you asking me this, Vlakh ?

    Replies: @Seraphim

    Because ‘Theosis’ in Orthodox Christian theology is not an ‘Indo-European’ theological concept, but the finality of the Incarnation, Passion and Resurrection of the Supreme Avatara, the Word of God.

    • Replies: @Bashibuzuk
    @Seraphim

    Great, we agree.

    Now please go and read my reply to LatW above. And while we're at it I will add this.

    https://ic.pics.livejournal.com/matveychev_oleg/27303223/7266376/7266376_900.jpg



    BTW, your Dacian ancestors have most probably spoken an archaic Balto-Slav language intermediate towards Thracian and Illyrian. Perhaps ancestral to Celtic.

    Now, you might have no respect for your Heathen ancestors, because you are one of those Church going folks who hear it on Sundays that they should "multiply as Jacob and have their wives being fecund and give birth to a God-pleasing posterity as Ruth did" (LOL)!, but perhaps all is not lost with you if you understand that Logos is the Avatar of the Highest God.

    Your ancestors also knew this in their own very old tradition, well before your Church arose its Cross on our lands and erased the Old Faith. Your ancestors knew it before the black - clothed priests (чернецы) erased and destroyed what once was a proud people and made them into wandering shepherds and humble peasants on whom any Turk could scornfully spit. Your ancestors built the first European urban civilization of Cucuteni - Tripolye that had the Swastikas drawn on its many artefacts. But you prefer following in the spiritual footsteps of aggressive alien goat-herders who only learned about God in their desert encampements thousands of years later than your ancestors built the first European towns. That they built before Egyptians built their pyramids.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Settlements_of_the_Cucuteni%E2%80%93Trypillia_culture

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/10/Talianki_%28Trypillian_city%29.jpg

    Now go and pray in your Greco-Semitic temple. And leave the Avatara to those who know where they come from and who they are. You are a self-made spiritual orphan, go join your Semitic imaginary adoptive family and leave us with our Kin (Род).

    Or take the time to think of your ancestors and be proud of their achievements.

    It's up to you, Vlakh.

    Replies: @Seraphim

  701. Bashibuzuk says:
    @LatW

    Tat tvam asi.

    By twisting a bit the Church Slavonic we might come to a highly similar Тут твой еси.
     
    Of course. It's very similar in the Baltic languages. The Russians used to have "esi" (now they have just есть), the Balts still have it. I am - es esmu, aš esu. (lat, lith).

    Another interesting phrase of a mysterious origin is "аз есмь царь". I am the Lord. It is almost identical to Latvian. It is a phrase used in the Gospel, by Jesus apparently. "I am the essence (of being)". "I am King". I'm still trying to figure out the origins of it (apparently, one had to be careful naming it, not to wear the Lord's name in vein?), it must be just Old Slavic language. But if so, then they may have spoken that way daily at some point which is identical to my language.


    When your Highest God is named Brahman and your priestly Varna is called Brahmin you can easily see what were the Priestly caste ultimate aspirations.
     
    James Frazer in The Golden Bough refers to a universal, "dying and re-birthing" fertility deity that could be viewed as a sacred king.

    Slavs recognized a higher God above all other minor gods of their pantheon.
     
    The Balts have Dievs, Dievas (in masculine) Who is above and beyond everyone else but Who is also near us. Similar to the Indo-European Father Sky (Zeus). Related to "daylight", "day" (diena, день, lat, rus - "day").

    to this very day Lithuanian is the closest language to Sanskrit, while 45% of Russian words from the Vologda region dialect have direct lexical cognates with Sanskrit as well.
     
    There's something special about Vologda. There is the special gene there and now you're saying the language connection, too. It has a kind of a northern feel, yet it is still very green, with lakes. It's the kind of environment my people like a lot.


    Imagine how close our languages might have been in Unetice times.
     
    Yea, it's fascinating. I wish I could hear it. When I first started learning Ukrainian, I was totally tripping out listening to Ukrainian being sung, it felt like there were moments when someone spoke to me in a language that felt very familiar on a deeper level.

    The Brahmin rode up, gathered on the high hill,
    They hung their swords* on the sacred tree.


    (Ancient Latvian poem).

    * warrior priests?

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

    In Old Slavonic they would have said “Аз есмь“. Which anyone who would have read the Bible and the Gospels in Russian would immediately recognize.

    [MORE]

    Итак, если Господь есть Тот, Кто поистине существует, то что же есть человек сам по себе? Это нам показал апостол Петр в своем ответе служанке первосвященника. После взятия Христа под стражу ближайший ученик впадает в состояние, которое на языке православных молитв называется «окамененным нечувствием». Пред читателем Евангелия предстает человек, который хочет скрыться, остаться неузнанным, возможно даже – исчезнуть, испариться, аннигилироваться, одним словом – не быть.

    Бог есть Сущий. Он имеет жизнь в Самом Себе (Ин. 5,26). Человек, как и весь мир, создан из ничего и не имеет автономного источника существования. Он существует только в меру причастности к Богу. Вне Бога – вне жизни. Если человек не утверждается на незыблемом фундаменте божественного Аз есмь, он не только соскальзывает в бездну небытия, в бездну своего изначального ничто. Он не может даже дать внятное обоснование своему собственному существованию, которое представляется в этом случае лишь игралищем стихий. В этом случае нельзя найти никаких серьезных доводов в подтверждение реального личностного существования.

    https://pravoslavie.ru/95624.html

    Finally, I am reassured: I am far more Orthodox that I would have thought. I am perhaps closer to Our Lord than some Church-going people. Why ? Because I know that Tat tvam asi, while their priests made this knowledge a taboo and have inserted themselves between the man and his God as a kind of metaphysical Firewall.

    And yeah, interesting that in Islam, Ibn Al Arabi al Andalusi, one of the greatest Sufi thinkers, who was niknamed the Shaykh al Akbar – the Greatest (spiritual) Leader, but also Ibn Alaflatun – The (spiritual) son/descendant of Plato, has said of God: “Allahuma kulyat el woojood”, literally: “The Highest God is the fulness / completeness of Existence”. What can be clearer than that ? What can be closer to the Advaita Vedanta that is probably the highest metaphysics of the “Indo-Europeans” (euphemism to avoid the Ar. word) ?

    Now, about Vologda:

    Древнеиндийские тексты повествуют, что на прародине, где много лесов и озер, находятся священные горы, которые делят землю на север и юг, а реки – на текущие к северу и текущие к югу. Река, текущая в южное море, называется Ра (это Волга). А та, что впадает в молочное или Белое море – это Двина (что на санскрите означает “двойная”). У Северной Двины и в самом деле нет своего истока – она возникает от слияния двух рек: Юга и Сухоны. А священные горы из древнеиндийского эпоса очень похожи по описанию на главный водораздел восточной Европы – Северные Увалы, эту гигантскую дугу из возвышенностей, пролегшую от Валдая на северо-восток до полярного Урала.

    Судя по исследованиям палеоклиматологов, в те времена, о которых повествуют “Веды”, средне зимняя температура на побережье Ледовитого океана была на 12 градусов выше, чем сейчас. И жилось там в смысле климата не хуже, чем нынче в приатлантических зонах западной Европы. “Подавляющее большинство названий наших рек можно без коверканья языка просто переводить с санскрита, – рассказывает Светлана Жарникова. – Сухона означает “легко преодолимая”, Кубена – “извилистая”, Суда – “ручей”, Дарида – “дающая воду”, Падма – “лотос, кувшинка”, Куша – “осока”, Сямжена – “объединяющая людей”. В Вологодской и Архангельской областях множество речек, озер и ручейков называются Ганг, Шива, Индига, Индосат, Синдошка, Индоманка. В моей книге тридцать страниц заняты этими названиями на санскрите. А сохраниться такие названия могут только в том случае – и это уже закон – если сохраняется народ, который дал эти названия. А если он исчезает, то и названия меняются”.

    https://vk.com/@v_e_d_i-pochemu-vologodskii-govor-ne-nuzhdaetsya-v-perevode-na-sansk

    That is why it is not surprising in the slightest that Vologda people have kept until the 1930ies embroidering Swastikas on their traditional dress, and carving it on their homes. Until some GPU/NKVD (Semitic?) officials decided that it is “Fascist” and should be punished by sending those peasants who just clung to their thousands’ years old traditions to the Death Camps. These peasants who again, not surprisingly were mostly Old Believers. When the GPU/NKVD scum finished their “scorching earth” policy there, for hundreds of kilometers villages stood empty in the Great Russian North.

    Immense wooden houses, so well suited for living in the boreal area. Built to last centuries on a land where free peasants who have never been enserfed, as the majority of those of the North have never been enslaved by the Romanov Czars and their henchmen, would live with their families. I have been in these forests, on the shores of these lakes until Onego and the White Sea and seen these old houses standing empty, their owners gone forever because an alien and toxic spirit has entered our land.

    From the Pavel Pryannikov’s Telegram channel (Pryannikov’s mom was a Jewish Moscovite, while his dad had a Northern Russian Old Believer ancestry)

    Читаю воспоминания Игоря Голомштока – известного советского диссидента. Уже писал кратко о нём. Он вырос в семье, где отчим и мать были «топ-менеджерами» НКВД – ГУЛАГа на Колыме. Вернулись они с Колымы в Москву в 1946 году. Голомшток окончил сразу два вуза – Финансовый институт и по искусствоведению.
    Голомшток оставил записи о жизни того самого номенклатурного либерал-чекизма, как раз формировавшегося в 1950-е, когда дети сталинских силовиков выбирали уже либерализм, а не дыбу.

    В 1951 году Голомшток стал инспектором банков в Москве. Его запись о своей работе:
    «В сферу моих обязанностей входило кредитование капитального строительства районных организаций — бань, прачечных, треста озеленения, треста очистки и пр. Говорят, что, в отличие от теперешнего российского беспредела, при Сталине был порядок. Какое там! Я должен был посещать подведомственные мне учреждения и проверять на месте использование средств, отпущенных на строительство. Чего только я там не насмотрелся! Деньги отпущены на сооружение оранжерей. Где оранжереи? «А мы, — говорят мне, — их сожгли». По платёжным ведомостям обнаруживалось, что зарплата продолжала поступать лицам, сидящим в тюрьме. Я понял, что кого-то придётся сажать и что, скорее всего, посаженным буду я. Надо было сматывать удочки, хотя ещё не истекли два обязательных года работы, положенные молодому специалисту после окончания института».

    В итоге Голомшток ведущим искусствоведом в Пушкинском музее. Он знакомится с московской богемой. В числе его друзей Майя Розанова (потом она станет Марией) и её муж писатель Синявский. Кстати, отчим Розановой был большой начальник в Политуправлении Пограничных войск Левитан. Здесь он описывает, как вместе с семейством Синявских-Розановых они в конце 1950-х добывали иконы и рукописные книги на Русском Севере:

    «Своё первое путешествие по реке Мезени Синявские совершили в 57-м году. На следующий год они пригласили с собой меня. В Москве мы приобрели лодочный мотор, в деревне где-то под Вологдой купили у рыбака старую лодку, и отправились вверх по течению Мезени.
    В верховьях реки на сотни километров виднелись по берегам брошенные деревни. В некоторых таких храмах ещё стояли древние разрозненные иконостасы, а части их и настенные иконы валялись на полу, покрытые толстым слоем птичьего помета. Майя очищала их от грязи и навоза, проводила ваткой со скипидаром по их черным поверхностям, и под ними часто проглядывало письмо XVI-XVII веков.

    В низовьях реки в деревнях еще обитала часть их прежнего населения, но и тут – пустые избы, церкви со сбитыми крестами, разрушенными куполами, сквозь которые дожди и снега, в зависимости от времени года, поливали и засыпали сохранившиеся в них доски с иконописью. Местное население использовало их для хозяйственных нужд. Иконами забивали дыры, на них рубили капусту, ими прикрывали бочки с соленьями (наш друг Коля Кишилов, работавший реставратором в Третьяковской галерее, в одной из деревень увидел окно, забитое иконой лицевой стороной наружу – под её глухой чёрной поверхностью обнаружился «Спас» XIII века).

    Главным интересом Андрея (Синявского) были не столько иконы, сколько книги. Когда-то жившие в этих местах старообрядцы устраивали в подвалах своих домов скрытни, в которых они занимались переписыванием книг. Один из таких скрытней Синявские обнаружили ещё во время их первого путешествия, и теперь они снова пришли сюда, захватив с собой и меня. Это было большое, во всю площадь избы, помещение без окон, с низким потолком, заваленное бумажной продукцией. Рукописные Жития, Апокрифы, старопечатные Библии, Четьи-Минеи, старообрядческие молитвенники — всё это кучами громоздилось на полу как ненужный хлам. Потомки этих книголюбов, ещё жившие в избе, никакого интереса к книгам не проявляли, ценности их не видели и использовали только как бумагу для цигарок. «За пятёрку — сколько унесешь!» Мы грузили эти сокровища в лодку, а потом, уже в крупных населенных пунктах в низовьях Мезени, Синявские по почте отправляли их в Москву к себе на Хлебный переулок».

    And they call us Orcs…

    • Replies: @LatW
    @Bashibuzuk


    Аз есмь
     
    Indeed, this is the very first ontological question. What is being? What am I? "I exist, I am the Being". "Аз есмь".

    Almost reminds me a little of Aristotle's unmoved mover, the mover of Cosmos that initiates movement on its own, without the influence of any other force. Or Odin, Who sacrifices Himself to Himself to gain the knowledge of the runes.

    In ancient mythical thinking all existence is divine or permeated with the divine (pantheism).


    Finally, I am reassured: I am far more Orthodox that I would have thought. I am perhaps closer to Our Lord than some Church-going people. Why ? Because I know that Tat tvam asi, while their priests made this knowledge a taboo and have inserted themselves between the man and his God as a kind of metaphysical Firewall.
     
    It's great that you can keep an open mind. The Old Believers think that the clergy lost God's blessing. They don't really have a place for that type of hierarchy. You know, how Jesus used to say "Split a piece of wood and I am there". Tat tvam asi.

    That is why it is not surprising in the slightest that Vologda people have kept until the 1930ies embroidering Swastikas on their traditional dress
     
    Thanks for posting that link about the Arctic homeland. It is not entirely unbelievable, as I said, it is the kind of environment that the ancestors liked. We also have place names such as Indra. Needless to say, the Vologda embroidery is very similar to the traditional Latvian one. Almost identical in some cases.

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/40/Laimas_krusts_Lielvardes_josta.jpg

    I personally prefer the more elaborate firecross (with more elaborate branches that spread out almost like a tree, it was on the Vologda embroidery, too).

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b5/Swastika_from_Baltic.jpg


    Immense wooden houses, so well suited for living in the boreal area. Built to last centuries on a land where free peasants who have never been enserfed, as the majority of those of the North have never been enslaved by the Romanov Czars and their henchmen, would live with their families. I have been in these forests, on the shores of these lakes until Onego and the White Sea and seen these old houses standing empty, their owners gone forever because an alien and toxic spirit has entered our land.

     

    This is very beautifully written. I really like those houses, the architecture, the detail in them, especially the windows. I absolutely love all the wooden carvings. I think it is easier to be more free in the North. But it's shocking how far they went to destroy it, I'm always shocked as to how deep the NKVD (and other imperial forces) manage to go.

    Thanks for that blog post. It's a very eerie scene where they find the iconoclasts. Heartbreaking. Imagine that the Old Believers had already been persecuted once (they were threatened with death), and then to do it to them all over again...


    And they call us Orcs…
     
    The Orcs are those who did that. It is orc-like to violate anyone's home.

    Btw, our Old Believers were harassed, too, by the NKVD in 1940-41 (same as one side of my family who actually lived not too far from some of their settlements).

    They are called "Pomortsi". They have a fantastic iconoclast in Riga (it's considered a piece of our cultural heritage).

    Replies: @LatW

  702. @Philip Owen
    @Mikel

    NATO was an irrelevance and only discussed because of Stavka paranoia. The UK and the US are the relevant parties without any refence to NATO. They had obligations under the Budapest Memorandum to assist Ukraine maintain its sovereignty against Russian invasion. The Russian proxy invasions of 2014 were unexpected so there had been no preparation.

    After 2014, the UK and US trained and equipped Ukraine to fight a Partizan war. So only infantry weapons were supplied. NLAWS, Javelins, sniper rifles. They did not expect Ukraine to prevail against a full scale Russian invasion. The Russian defeat at the battle of Kiev was a surpise both as an event and in terms of the scale of the Russian rout. There is now an effort to ramp up Ukrainian capability with heavier weapons and more adanced training. Urban warfare at night in my direct observation - winter is coming. There is still no NATO intervention in Ukraine or short term prospect of Ukraine joining NATO. The Eastern Europeans of course now support Ukraine out of shared memories of colonization by Russia. The Germans and the French because they know the side with which they need to maintain good relations. Also, better for Ukraine to defeat Russia (greater humiliation for the regime). Even so, if Russia downs a Turkish ship NATO will be involved.

    This war is completely down to the FSB' and Stavka's imperialist urge to genocide Ukrainian identity. The intention has been there since at least the time of Nicholas 1 who tried with Poland first.

    Replies: @Mikel, @LondonBob

    No, NATO thought Russia hadn’t assembled enough forces to invade successfully, of course Russia didn’t invade to conquer, they invaded to assist the Donbass and force a diplomatic settlement. They then thought the Russian economy would collapse after sanctions and Russia would be diplomatically isolated, it didn’t work out. Russia has gone on far longer than the neocons planned, and Russia has destroyed so much of the Soviet era weaponry they have been forced to supply more than they ever thought necessary.

    • Replies: @Philip Owen
    @LondonBob

    Putin state that he was invading to decommunize Ukraine, which is to say, conquer Novorossiya, the Kharkiv state. It is slowly slipping away.

  703. @Mikel
    @Wokechoke


    The tricky part is that Russia invaded with far too few infantry. So they look feeble in terms of keeping ground.
     
    It's more than that. They finally took Mariupol at an immense cost against a totally sorrounded enemy. But now they lack the ability to take Bakhmut or Soledar.

    Replies: @LatW, @LondonBob, @QCIC

    The Russians weren’t supposed to take Mariupol at all, the NATO plan was to lure Russia in to bloody urban battles, hence all the anti tank guns, but the Russian disproved the old three to one to the attackers manpower superiority rule.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @LondonBob

    Mariupol is the single example of a grinding Urban fight that the Russians accepted.

    Replies: @A123, @AnonfromTN

  704. @Wokechoke
    @Mikel

    Assessing from an Olympian height the Russians have erased the deep reserves of gear found in NATO arsenals. The Russian claims of equipment lost by Ukraine even if you divide by .5 or .1 are horrific by a Western European standards.

    They claim 6,500 APC AFV MBT etc destroyed, divide by 2 and it’s still 3,000. ~ divide by 10 and it’s 600. Clean out the armouries and motor pools.


    They claim 800 MLRS type vehicles destroyed.

    The tricky part is that Russia invaded with far too few infantry. So they look feeble in terms of keeping ground.

    Replies: @Mikel, @LondonBob

    T55s from Slovenia now.

  705. Bashibuzuk says:
    @Seraphim
    @Bashibuzuk

    Because 'Theosis' in Orthodox Christian theology is not an 'Indo-European' theological concept, but the finality of the Incarnation, Passion and Resurrection of the Supreme Avatara, the Word of God.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

    Great, we agree.

    Now please go and read my reply to LatW above. And while we’re at it I will add this.

    [MORE]

    BTW, your Dacian ancestors have most probably spoken an archaic Balto-Slav language intermediate towards Thracian and Illyrian. Perhaps ancestral to Celtic.

    Now, you might have no respect for your Heathen ancestors, because you are one of those Church going folks who hear it on Sundays that they should “multiply as Jacob and have their wives being fecund and give birth to a God-pleasing posterity as Ruth did” (LOL)!, but perhaps all is not lost with you if you understand that Logos is the Avatar of the Highest God.

    Your ancestors also knew this in their own very old tradition, well before your Church arose its Cross on our lands and erased the Old Faith. Your ancestors knew it before the black – clothed priests (чернецы) erased and destroyed what once was a proud people and made them into wandering shepherds and humble peasants on whom any Turk could scornfully spit. Your ancestors built the first European urban civilization of Cucuteni – Tripolye that had the Swastikas drawn on its many artefacts. But you prefer following in the spiritual footsteps of aggressive alien goat-herders who only learned about God in their desert encampements thousands of years later than your ancestors built the first European towns. That they built before Egyptians built their pyramids.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Settlements_of_the_Cucuteni%E2%80%93Trypillia_culture

    Now go and pray in your Greco-Semitic temple. And leave the Avatara to those who know where they come from and who they are. You are a self-made spiritual orphan, go join your Semitic imaginary adoptive family and leave us with our Kin (Род).

    Or take the time to think of your ancestors and be proud of their achievements.

    It’s up to you, Vlakh.

    • Replies: @Seraphim
    @Bashibuzuk

    So, you are one of these 'Rodnovery' masturbators. Continue to do it to your heart content as long as you don't burn churches and kill the 'чернецы'.
    BTW my 'Dacian ancestors' (ancestors of the Vlahs), the only natives of the lands you have the gal to claim as yours, were the 'most wise, just and brave among the barbarians' and therefore not the ancestors of the Turkish/Khazar flotsam and jetsam scum 'Bashbuzuks' ("A bashi-bazouk (Ottoman Turkish: باشی بوزوق başıbozuk, 'one whose head is turned, damaged head, crazy-head', roughly "leaderless" or "disorderly" was an irregular soldier of the Ottoman army, raised in times of war'') washed ashore on the 'Cucuteni – Tripolye' land.

    Replies: @sher singh, @Bashibuzuk

  706. @Mikel
    @Beckow


    There is no contradiction between trying to understand and wanting peace.
     
    When you claim once and again that Putin had no choice but to start this catastrophic war you are obviously going beyond just trying to understand. That would be like me saying that NATO had no other choice but to depose Gadhafi or bomb Yugoslavia, although they shouldn't have really done it.

    You are right that listening to what the Russians say is essential to try to understand what is going on and how this is likely to evolve. That's why I personally get most of my information about this war from Russian sources. But to be honest, it's not a great mystery why Putin decided to invade Ukraine if we pay attention to what he said and did in the past years. Because he wanted Russia to be treated like a big superpower with its own sphere of influence again, because he thought that Russia had achieved a much bigger level of military power than it really had and because he was obviously willing to cause massive casualties and damage to civilians in pursuit of his goals. You don't invade a big country like Ukraine and try to remove its military and militias from highly populated cities if you are not willing to kill many innocent civilians. Even when the Donbass militias went on the offensive against the weak Ukrainian army in 2015 they couldn't help killing civilians in Gorlovka, Volnovakha, Mariupol, etc. That was always part of his macabre calculation, even if he thought that the survivors would eventually be better off under Russian rule in case he cares about such things.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Beckow

    …no choice but to start this catastrophic war

    It is not my ‘claim’, I explained what the security situation looked like from their point of view. You didn’t address it, instead you said that ‘doing nothing‘ would have been better. You fail to provide an example when a major power in the same situation would do nothing.

    like me saying that NATO had no other choice but to depose Gadhafi or bomb Yugoslavia

    You can say whatever you wish, but it is on its face a meaningless comparison regarding security. Even theoretical claims by Nato for threats from Yugoslavia and Libya (or Iraq, Syria) were an order of magnitude less serious and they were largely made up. There is no real comparison: Nato was actively moving into Ukraine and they were not going there to play bocce-ball with the locals. Finally address that point – all else is noise.

    obviously willing to cause massive casualties and damage to civilians in pursuit of his goals.

    Big countries are like that. Nato caused massive casualties and damage to civilian infrastructure with not a peep from the official Western media, literati or anyone who matters. Ok, some peeps, but in a tightly controlled environment. About the same as the anti-war demos in Russia now.

    The catastrophic hubris of Nato claiming that they can do whatever they dream off, bomb, kill, lie, occupy, build bases, change borders, etc…is the root cause of this war. No rational observer believes that without Nato destruction of Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya…this war would be taking place. Do you understand the meaning of a ‘precedent’?

    Let’s see who wins, but it is too late for anyone in the West to belly-ache that ‘wars are bloody’. Yes, they are, Nato has shown us again and again. I recall they were rewarded.

    • Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Beckow

    Have you read any of the firsthand stories from Sarajevo during the good old days of the Bill Clinton administration?

    They had the the portrait of the Serbian president on the cover of Time magazine with the headline Face of Evil.

    Sow wind reap whirlwind . . .

    , @Mikel
    @Beckow



    obviously willing to cause massive casualties and damage to civilians in pursuit of his goals.

    Big countries are like that.
     
    So why do you complain about the massive casualties caused by the US? It is a big country, like Russia. It has "no choice" but to act like that, according to your logic.

    You may protest the idea that you are supporting and justifying Russia's carnage as much as you want but that's exactly what you have chosen to do here, as if for some reason you also had no personal choice but to always side with the Kremlin.

    And we've clearly entered the phase of diminishing returns in this conversation. I don't think I am going to have any more success getting you to admit any wrongdoing by the Kremlin than getting Sher Singh to start eating beef.
  707. @Bashibuzuk
    @Seraphim

    Great, we agree.

    Now please go and read my reply to LatW above. And while we're at it I will add this.

    https://ic.pics.livejournal.com/matveychev_oleg/27303223/7266376/7266376_900.jpg



    BTW, your Dacian ancestors have most probably spoken an archaic Balto-Slav language intermediate towards Thracian and Illyrian. Perhaps ancestral to Celtic.

    Now, you might have no respect for your Heathen ancestors, because you are one of those Church going folks who hear it on Sundays that they should "multiply as Jacob and have their wives being fecund and give birth to a God-pleasing posterity as Ruth did" (LOL)!, but perhaps all is not lost with you if you understand that Logos is the Avatar of the Highest God.

    Your ancestors also knew this in their own very old tradition, well before your Church arose its Cross on our lands and erased the Old Faith. Your ancestors knew it before the black - clothed priests (чернецы) erased and destroyed what once was a proud people and made them into wandering shepherds and humble peasants on whom any Turk could scornfully spit. Your ancestors built the first European urban civilization of Cucuteni - Tripolye that had the Swastikas drawn on its many artefacts. But you prefer following in the spiritual footsteps of aggressive alien goat-herders who only learned about God in their desert encampements thousands of years later than your ancestors built the first European towns. That they built before Egyptians built their pyramids.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Settlements_of_the_Cucuteni%E2%80%93Trypillia_culture

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/10/Talianki_%28Trypillian_city%29.jpg

    Now go and pray in your Greco-Semitic temple. And leave the Avatara to those who know where they come from and who they are. You are a self-made spiritual orphan, go join your Semitic imaginary adoptive family and leave us with our Kin (Род).

    Or take the time to think of your ancestors and be proud of their achievements.

    It's up to you, Vlakh.

    Replies: @Seraphim

    So, you are one of these ‘Rodnovery’ masturbators. Continue to do it to your heart content as long as you don’t burn churches and kill the ‘чернецы’.
    BTW my ‘Dacian ancestors’ (ancestors of the Vlahs), the only natives of the lands you have the gal to claim as yours, were the ‘most wise, just and brave among the barbarians’ and therefore not the ancestors of the Turkish/Khazar flotsam and jetsam scum ‘Bashbuzuks’ (“A bashi-bazouk (Ottoman Turkish: باشی بوزوق başıbozuk, ‘one whose head is turned, damaged head, crazy-head’, roughly “leaderless” or “disorderly” was an irregular soldier of the Ottoman army, raised in times of war”) washed ashore on the ‘Cucuteni – Tripolye’ land.

    • Replies: @sher singh
    @Seraphim

    Nobody takes christianity seriously or has in 300 years.
    You're the superstition of liberalism now - what you used to call Pagans in jest.

    Getae are just Jatts who turned gay - christianity is a gay religion.
    Jesus wept on the cross, you gave women rights, you don't carry arms||

    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ

    Replies: @Seraphim

    , @Bashibuzuk
    @Seraphim

    You don’t get it Vlakh. But I did not really expect you would. That is because you are cut from your spiritual bloodline and have been turned into a spiritual slave. You have deprived your illustrious ancestry of their spiritual posterity. You are a spiritual eunuch and a spiritual mankurt.



    Regarding the чернцы, did you know that the ancient Rus warrior elite, although recently baptized, considered it a very bed omen meeting one of these monks while going towards battle? They sometimes preferred to kill him on sight if they met one, to prevent their meeting from bringing a bad fortune to the fight.

    Why would that be?

    Because these black - clothed monks were carriers of a foreign manipulative and toxic spiritual tradition, of which you are a victim.

    http://www.grazdanin-gazeta.ru/archive/2015/sentyabr-2015/20-24-sentyabrya-2015/1001/

    Here, you have a story among many of our ancestors interactions with your faith.

    Where are our proud Princes today ?

    Where are our wise Priests who could kill a Prince outright if he betrayed his folks ?

    But your black - clothed monks are still here, praying for whomever gives them power to enslave. They prayed for Caesars, prayed for Basileis, prayed for Great Princes, Tatar Khans and Otroman Sultans then Russian Czars and Emperors.

    They have prayed for Stalin, who was killing thousands among them, prayed for Hitler, then Yeltsin and Putin and their regime which is depriving Russian people of their wealth to the point of depopulation, and now in Ukraine they probably already pray for NATO.

    When the final Kali Yauga comes, most of them will pray for the Antichrist.

    That's spiritual opportunism in its purest form.

    Of course they are not all like that, the Old Believer ones were better people. But only because they kept some Old Faith honor in their acting. That's why their brothers in faith killed and burned them.

    Go pray for the final salvation of Israel, Vlakh!

    😇

    Replies: @Barbarossa

  708. Bashibuzuk says:
    @China Japan and Korea Bromance of Three Kingdoms
    @Bashibuzuk

    Thanks. In official history Sima Qian's Records of the Grand Historian (c. 91 BC), Xiongnu is said to have descended from the son of the last king of Xia dynasty. His name is probably a cognate of Chanyu.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chunwei

    Xia (c. 2070 BC–c. 1600 BC) is the first dynasty in official historiography and has not been verified by archeology and archeogenetics. So they may have been Eurasian nomads. They were also roughly contemporaneous with Yamnaya expansion.

    Xia got kicked out of Central Plains by Shang and became nomads again. This is the exact parallel of the Mongol Yuan getting kicked out of Central Plains by Ming, 2900 years later, retreating the steppes and founding the Northern Yuan.

    The Anglosphere gets hanged up on a sharp division between East and West Eurasians, but Eurasian nomads should have always been a mix of Europoid and Mongloid features, like Putin and Shoigu.

    I'm familiar with Gumilyov who's gone beyond Chinese historians on studies of Eurasian nomads. I guess that made him persona non grata (?) because it offended ROC and PRC's claim on Inner Asia territories. He's done extensive work on Xianbei who has the same golden ornaments as Indo-Iranian Scythians, Yuechi, etc.
    https://i.postimg.cc/HxbyTT81/Belt-Buckle-Xianbei3-4thcentury.jpg
    https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Сяньби

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

    The Anglosphere gets hanged up on a sharp division between East and West Eurasians, but Eurasian nomads should have always been a mix of Europoid and Mongloid features, like Putin and Shoigu.

    Xianbei who has the same golden ornaments as Indo-Iranian Scythians, Yuechi, etc.

    Yes I agree, they have intermixed since times immemorial. I mean, already by the times of the Botaï culture, there was a mixed Western Eurasian / Eastern Eurasian population. There is a haplogroup cline going West to East in Eurasia but it is thousand years old, well before the advent of the historically recorded populations.

    I basically prefer thinking of all that era in Central Asia / Southern Siberia as an interaction between three ancestral populations: Afanasievo folks (Yamnaya – descended, Y haplogroup R1b), Okunevo folks (ancestral to the Altaic – Extreme Oriental – Finno-Ugric, Y haplogroup Q and NO1) and Andronovo folks (Arian, Y haplogroup R1a).

    In Western Europe you add the Megalithic Culture folks (Y haplogroup I) and in Central and Southern Europe you add the neolithic farmer populations that came from Anatolia and Middle East (Y haplogroups E, G etc.).

    I am pretty much convinced that most people posting on UR are related to one of these ancestral populations.

    It is actually a shame that the official historiography everywhere is not properly teaching the past interactions of these Eurasian populations. If it would, perhaps we would be more open-minded towards people of other Eurasian cultures. But it’s not surprising really, divide et impera has been, and still is the norm.

    • Thanks: Mr. Hack
  709. @Barbarossa
    @Coconuts


    while people are reluctant to kill or die for anything, they are also weirdly reluctant to have children, despite conditions for it being more favourable than ever in history
     
    I don't think it's really that strange, they are just natural symptoms of the current mindset. I see the modern mindset as essentially being that of the individualistic consumer. We are all our own little gods (or at least we are made to feel like we are! #Pride). Thus what matters is not the wonderful and endless cycle of the generations, but only our brief moment in the sun.

    So why have kids, care about anything but creature comforts, or risk all for a larger ideal when there is another TikTok on queue? If one doesn't care about anything bigger than themselves than they are not likely to go out of their way to undergo risk for anything bigger than themselves.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk, @Coconuts

    So why have kids, care about anything but creature comforts, or risk all for a larger ideal when there is another TikTok on queue?

    The weird or thought provoking thing about this is maybe that it itself is the fruit of a great revolutionary ideal, the ‘Promethean Voluntarism’ of the social revolutionaries of the 19th and 20th centuries. The last man type can be seen as the mass product of the diffusion of Sartre’s ‘existence precedes essence’ idea.

    I think a writer and ex-soldier like Drieu, who was preoccupied with the issue of personal and collective decadence in the 1920s and 30s, was drawn into Fascism by awareness of the potential for an outcome like this. That didn’t go well for him or in general. But then things like the fall of the USSR and the end of socialism in Western Europe were indications of serious problems with the revolutionary ideals as they mature. These haven’t gone away as we can see at the moment.

    • Agree: Bashibuzuk
    • Replies: @Barbarossa
    @Coconuts


    Promethean Voluntarism
     
    Could you explain a bit more what you mean by this term? Thanks much.

    I understand Fascism as a reaction, but it has the disadvantage of being another centralized statist abstraction, though it borrows and co-opts nostalgic tropes such as "blood and soil" from pre-modern times. Fascism sounds promising on a superficial level but the roots are not there.

    But at this point we are all uprooted to some extent. Even if Sher Singh is operating in an ethno-religious enclave his identity is compromised by the very fact of being in Canada and playing his part in the globalist project. Most of us, myself included, are more atomized yet, which is like going through life handicapped, though most don't realize that they are even missing anything. But the only real way that I see to recover what is missing is to put down literal roots in a physical place and stand one's ground. There are a lot of ideologies that promise a shortcut to this process, but I don't see it.

    indications of serious problems with the revolutionary ideals as they mature.
     
    I think that perhaps part of the issue is the very speed that the machine ages pushes us. We as human beings or societies have a limited amount of change that we can safely cope with and assimilate. The pace and human movement and information flow in the modern age far outstrip what is possible for some modicum of stability and so we are subject to massive instability. I don't think the contradictions will resolve, but that the oscillations bill just get more intense and unhinged until something slows us back down to a more human scale. Or perhaps the "archetypal passive nihilist" type is just a coping mechanism on a massive scale to these contradictions. To just give up and abandon oneself to dissipation is certainly an easy way to resolve the rub, but is a self perpetuating and cowardly one.
  710. @Seraphim
    @Bashibuzuk

    So, you are one of these 'Rodnovery' masturbators. Continue to do it to your heart content as long as you don't burn churches and kill the 'чернецы'.
    BTW my 'Dacian ancestors' (ancestors of the Vlahs), the only natives of the lands you have the gal to claim as yours, were the 'most wise, just and brave among the barbarians' and therefore not the ancestors of the Turkish/Khazar flotsam and jetsam scum 'Bashbuzuks' ("A bashi-bazouk (Ottoman Turkish: باشی بوزوق başıbozuk, 'one whose head is turned, damaged head, crazy-head', roughly "leaderless" or "disorderly" was an irregular soldier of the Ottoman army, raised in times of war'') washed ashore on the 'Cucuteni – Tripolye' land.

    Replies: @sher singh, @Bashibuzuk

    Nobody takes christianity seriously or has in 300 years.
    You’re the superstition of liberalism now – what you used to call Pagans in jest.

    Getae are just Jatts who turned gay – christianity is a gay religion.
    Jesus wept on the cross, you gave women rights, you don’t carry arms||

    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ

    • Agree: Bashibuzuk
    • Disagree: Mr. Hack
    • Troll: silviosilver
    • Replies: @Seraphim
    @sher singh

    You may notice that Russians take Christianity seriously and they started to clean the 'gay' shit. Ans they carry arms. Big ones that will make you weep.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk, @sher singh

  711. Bashibuzuk says:
    @Seraphim
    @Bashibuzuk

    So, you are one of these 'Rodnovery' masturbators. Continue to do it to your heart content as long as you don't burn churches and kill the 'чернецы'.
    BTW my 'Dacian ancestors' (ancestors of the Vlahs), the only natives of the lands you have the gal to claim as yours, were the 'most wise, just and brave among the barbarians' and therefore not the ancestors of the Turkish/Khazar flotsam and jetsam scum 'Bashbuzuks' ("A bashi-bazouk (Ottoman Turkish: باشی بوزوق başıbozuk, 'one whose head is turned, damaged head, crazy-head', roughly "leaderless" or "disorderly" was an irregular soldier of the Ottoman army, raised in times of war'') washed ashore on the 'Cucuteni – Tripolye' land.

    Replies: @sher singh, @Bashibuzuk

    You don’t get it Vlakh. But I did not really expect you would. That is because you are cut from your spiritual bloodline and have been turned into a spiritual slave. You have deprived your illustrious ancestry of their spiritual posterity. You are a spiritual eunuch and a spiritual mankurt.

    [MORE]

    Regarding the чернцы, did you know that the ancient Rus warrior elite, although recently baptized, considered it a very bed omen meeting one of these monks while going towards battle? They sometimes preferred to kill him on sight if they met one, to prevent their meeting from bringing a bad fortune to the fight.

    Why would that be?

    Because these black – clothed monks were carriers of a foreign manipulative and toxic spiritual tradition, of which you are a victim.

    http://www.grazdanin-gazeta.ru/archive/2015/sentyabr-2015/20-24-sentyabrya-2015/1001/

    Here, you have a story among many of our ancestors interactions with your faith.

    Where are our proud Princes today ?

    Where are our wise Priests who could kill a Prince outright if he betrayed his folks ?

    But your black – clothed monks are still here, praying for whomever gives them power to enslave. They prayed for Caesars, prayed for Basileis, prayed for Great Princes, Tatar Khans and Otroman Sultans then Russian Czars and Emperors.

    They have prayed for Stalin, who was killing thousands among them, prayed for Hitler, then Yeltsin and Putin and their regime which is depriving Russian people of their wealth to the point of depopulation, and now in Ukraine they probably already pray for NATO.

    When the final Kali Yauga comes, most of them will pray for the Antichrist.

    That’s spiritual opportunism in its purest form.

    Of course they are not all like that, the Old Believer ones were better people. But only because they kept some Old Faith honor in their acting. That’s why their brothers in faith killed and burned them.

    Go pray for the final salvation of Israel, Vlakh!

    😇

    • Replies: @Barbarossa
    @Bashibuzuk

    Christianity went wrong the minute it began owning property and becoming a political force. It was the exact opposite of living "in spirit and in truth" and the Churches have indeed become often worse than the Pharisees that Jesus defied.

    But I don't think that Jesus ever intended for a religion to be instituted. It was supposed to be beyond mere religion.

    Christianity did best when it didn't replace the pre-Christian beliefs but augmented them. As my old mentor put it referring to old Celtic Christianity; Christianity was grafted onto a healthy pagan root-stock. Such can never be left alone though since they pose a threat to the centralizers and power mongers.

  712. @sher singh
    @Seraphim

    Nobody takes christianity seriously or has in 300 years.
    You're the superstition of liberalism now - what you used to call Pagans in jest.

    Getae are just Jatts who turned gay - christianity is a gay religion.
    Jesus wept on the cross, you gave women rights, you don't carry arms||

    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ

    Replies: @Seraphim

    You may notice that Russians take Christianity seriously and they started to clean the ‘gay’ shit. Ans they carry arms. Big ones that will make you weep.

    • LOL: Bashibuzuk
    • Replies: @Bashibuzuk
    @Seraphim

    Less than 2% of Russians go to Church on a regular basis. Less than 20% ethnic Russian youths under 18 years old self-identify as strongly religious. And there is a good reason for that.



    They see the hypocrisy of the Church. They see how its higher hierarchy is profiteering and living in a boastful opulence, while its lowest ranks in small villages in the dying RusFed hinterland are having a hard time getting by.

    Some of my ancestors were Orthodox Priests. But they have already left the Church service before the first Revolution of 1905. Why ? Because already in these days it was apparent how hypocrite most Church hierarchy was.

    Saint Seraphim of Sarov (have you chosen your moniker after him) prophesied in the nineteenth century that Church would end up corrupt and that there would be a Revolution and a Civil War. But then he was of Old Believer ancestry himself, and lived his ascetic life in an Old Believer region of the Russian Empire.

    When the February Revolution happened in 1917, the Church prayed for the Revolution and gave its blessings to those who jailed the Czar. They turned their backs on their Emperor, but they made a Saint of him and his family that they left to be killed by the Judeo-Bol'shevik.

    In the 1990ies, they received from Yeltsin's Cabal the right to import alcohol and cigarettes in RusFed taxe-free, and while the desperate people got drunk and died in droves of alcoholism, they sold cigarette to young kids making them addicted to tobacco. Today, on both sides of a fratricidal conflict in Ukraine they give their blessings to Slavs who kill their brothers.

    Your Gundyaev's ROC чернцы are a plague. Same thing about the Constantinople Oecumenic Patriarch's priests in Ukraine and of course the Uniate Papists. A curse on Eastern Slav people all of them. Тьфу на них...

    😇

    Replies: @Seraphim

    , @sher singh
    @Seraphim

    Russian women have the right to marry and divorce.
    I'm using an old definition of gay as generally effeminate.

    The majority of Russians have no problem with inter-racial marriage,
    They certainly won't kill over it|| Christianity is leftism, support it honestly or GTFO.

    Russians do not carry weapons, and Christianity discourages violence.
    Stop substituting the state army for individual initiative.
    The very concept of Christian rule of law refutes your argument.
    You were better off under the Turks.

    https://www.academia.edu/1549528/2_The_Christian_origins_of_secularism_and_the_rule_of_law

    https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/777363024196796426/852791619115417620/unknown.png

  713. The spiritual treasures that the Cuceteni-Tripolye culture left behind to be admired was spread on lands that were later the homeland of nationalities that would develop including both Romanians and Ukrainians. It’s a shared heritage that both peoples should use to help form friendly ties today. Their proclivity towards non-violence most likely explains how they managed to dissapear into the mists of history…the map says it all:

    • Replies: @Bashibuzuk
    @Mr. Hack


    nationalities that would develop including both Romanians and Ukrainians.
     
    Cucuteni - Tripolye >>> Globular Amphora Culture >>> mix with Corded Ware folks >>> Balto - Slav >>> Arkaim Sintashta >>> Indo - Aryan & Avestan Aryan >>> mix with Afanasievo Okunevo folks >>> Botaï Culture folks >>> Finno-Ugric (through Seima Turbino, Akozino-Malar and Sargat Culture), Turkic (through Tagar and Karasuk Culture) and Altaic populations.

    Cucuteni - Tripolye >>> Globular Amphora Culture >>> mix with Corded Ware folks >>> mix with Bell Beaker folks >>> Unetice Culture >>> Celts, Dacians, Thracian, Illyrian, Getae etc.

    I don't see Ukrainian and Romanian nations among these people.

    😉

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

  714. Bashibuzuk says:
    @Seraphim
    @sher singh

    You may notice that Russians take Christianity seriously and they started to clean the 'gay' shit. Ans they carry arms. Big ones that will make you weep.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk, @sher singh

    Less than 2% of Russians go to Church on a regular basis. Less than 20% ethnic Russian youths under 18 years old self-identify as strongly religious. And there is a good reason for that.

    [MORE]

    They see the hypocrisy of the Church. They see how its higher hierarchy is profiteering and living in a boastful opulence, while its lowest ranks in small villages in the dying RusFed hinterland are having a hard time getting by.

    Some of my ancestors were Orthodox Priests. But they have already left the Church service before the first Revolution of 1905. Why ? Because already in these days it was apparent how hypocrite most Church hierarchy was.

    Saint Seraphim of Sarov (have you chosen your moniker after him) prophesied in the nineteenth century that Church would end up corrupt and that there would be a Revolution and a Civil War. But then he was of Old Believer ancestry himself, and lived his ascetic life in an Old Believer region of the Russian Empire.

    When the February Revolution happened in 1917, the Church prayed for the Revolution and gave its blessings to those who jailed the Czar. They turned their backs on their Emperor, but they made a Saint of him and his family that they left to be killed by the Judeo-Bol’shevik.

    In the 1990ies, they received from Yeltsin’s Cabal the right to import alcohol and cigarettes in RusFed taxe-free, and while the desperate people got drunk and died in droves of alcoholism, they sold cigarette to young kids making them addicted to tobacco. Today, on both sides of a fratricidal conflict in Ukraine they give their blessings to Slavs who kill their brothers.

    Your Gundyaev’s ROC чернцы are a plague. Same thing about the Constantinople Oecumenic Patriarch’s priests in Ukraine and of course the Uniate Papists. A curse on Eastern Slav people all of them. Тьфу на них…

    😇

    • Replies: @Seraphim
    @Bashibuzuk

    The Old Believers were heretical schismatics, carrying on the 'Raskol' against Orthodoxy of their predecessors the 'Judaizers' (zhidovomudrstvuyushchiye). They actually supported the 'revolutionaries' like Bakunin and the 'narodniks' who saw and exploited their 'anti-governmental and revolutionary potential'. Once Tsar Nicholas II issued the Edict of Toleration, allowing them to function freely in Russia, their richest people (very much resembling the 'oligarchs') like Savva Morozov (related to the Old Believer 'martyr' Feodosia Prokopiyevna Morozova?) started to make significant financial contributions to the Bolshevik faction of the Russian Social Democratic Workers Party, including making payments to the newspaper Iskra. Leninist publications were printed overseas and were imported secretly through the channels of the Old Believers and sectarians. The very origin of the 'Soviet' was related to the Bespopovtsy and sectarians like the Dukhobors.
    No Saint Seraphim was not an 'Old Believer'. He constantly rebuked them.

  715. Bashibuzuk says:
    @Mr. Hack
    The spiritual treasures that the Cuceteni-Tripolye culture left behind to be admired was spread on lands that were later the homeland of nationalities that would develop including both Romanians and Ukrainians. It's a shared heritage that both peoples should use to help form friendly ties today. Their proclivity towards non-violence most likely explains how they managed to dissapear into the mists of history...the map says it all:

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/bc/Cucuteni-Tripol%27ye_Culture_Outline_Map.png/800px-Cucuteni-Tripol%27ye_Culture_Outline_Map.png

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

    nationalities that would develop including both Romanians and Ukrainians.

    Cucuteni – Tripolye >>> Globular Amphora Culture >>> mix with Corded Ware folks >>> Balto – Slav >>> Arkaim Sintashta >>> Indo – Aryan & Avestan Aryan >>> mix with Afanasievo Okunevo folks >>> Botaï Culture folks >>> Finno-Ugric (through Seima Turbino, Akozino-Malar and Sargat Culture), Turkic (through Tagar and Karasuk Culture) and Altaic populations.

    Cucuteni – Tripolye >>> Globular Amphora Culture >>> mix with Corded Ware folks >>> mix with Bell Beaker folks >>> Unetice Culture >>> Celts, Dacians, Thracian, Illyrian, Getae etc.

    I don’t see Ukrainian and Romanian nations among these people.

    😉

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @Bashibuzuk

    They came later...they weren't just seeded on earth from outer space in flying saucers. :-)

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

  716. @Mikel
    @Wokechoke


    The tricky part is that Russia invaded with far too few infantry. So they look feeble in terms of keeping ground.
     
    It's more than that. They finally took Mariupol at an immense cost against a totally sorrounded enemy. But now they lack the ability to take Bakhmut or Soledar.

    Replies: @LatW, @LondonBob, @QCIC

    None of this matters once Ukraine capitulates.

    • Troll: S
  717. @LondonBob
    @Mikel

    The Russians weren't supposed to take Mariupol at all, the NATO plan was to lure Russia in to bloody urban battles, hence all the anti tank guns, but the Russian disproved the old three to one to the attackers manpower superiority rule.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    Mariupol is the single example of a grinding Urban fight that the Russians accepted.

    • Replies: @A123
    @Wokechoke


    Mariupol is the single example of a grinding Urban fight that the Russians accepted.
     
    Russia wanted to save Mariupol as a functioning city. The advance was slow to carefully target neo-Nazi positions, thus minimizing collateral damage. They largely succeeded, with the obvious exception of the industrial area around the Azov Steelworks.

    Russian residents of Mariupol have fresh water, electricity, functioning sewers, etc. The city is currently more livable than Kiev.
    _____

    Any city that Russia does not believe they will be able to permanently retain will be treated differently. Breaking infrastructure that the enemy will have to rebuild is part of warfare.

    The Ukie-stan terror attack on the Kerch Bridge means everything is in play. Strikes on heating during bitterly cold days of Jan/Feb could paralyze Lviv, and other cities, well away from the front lines.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @sudden death

    , @AnonfromTN
    @Wokechoke

    It was not RF alone, it was RF plus DPR plus LPR. The United forces not only accepted but won having fewer people than Ukies.
    When I come back, I intend to write a brief summary of my trip that included Moscow, Lugansk, and an average Russian provincial city of Penza. Quite informative.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Philip Owen

  718. @Wokechoke
    @LondonBob

    Mariupol is the single example of a grinding Urban fight that the Russians accepted.

    Replies: @A123, @AnonfromTN

    Mariupol is the single example of a grinding Urban fight that the Russians accepted.

    Russia wanted to save Mariupol as a functioning city. The advance was slow to carefully target neo-Nazi positions, thus minimizing collateral damage. They largely succeeded, with the obvious exception of the industrial area around the Azov Steelworks.

    Russian residents of Mariupol have fresh water, electricity, functioning sewers, etc. The city is currently more livable than Kiev.
    _____

    Any city that Russia does not believe they will be able to permanently retain will be treated differently. Breaking infrastructure that the enemy will have to rebuild is part of warfare.

    The Ukie-stan terror attack on the Kerch Bridge means everything is in play. Strikes on heating during bitterly cold days of Jan/Feb could paralyze Lviv, and other cities, well away from the front lines.

    PEACE 😇

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @A123

    Pro-Putin sympathizer, kremlinstoogeA123, again trying to paint a rosy picture of Mariupol. I don't see any residents of Kyiv packing up and leaving to live in the "more livable Mariupol than Kyiv".

    He should watch this new documentary that is opening up in New York city today, to get a better understanding of what happened in Mariupol:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NeLqj9JMrxw&feature=emb_rel_end

    Former Vice President Pence got it right when he recently stated:


    I know there is a rising chorus in our party, including some new voices to our movement, who would have us disengage with the wider world, and abandon the traditional values of the heart of our movement,” Pence said Wednesday. “But appeasement has never worked, ever, in history. And now more than ever we need a conservative movement committed to America’s role as leader of the free world and as a vanguard of American values.” Pence on Wednesday called Russia’s invasion “unconscionable,” and he urged conservatives to push back against Russian President Vladimir Putin. “There can be no room in the conservative movement for apologists for Putin,” Pence said. “There is only room in this movement for champions of freedom.”

     

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    , @sudden death
    @A123


    Russia wanted to save Mariupol as a functioning city. The advance was slow to carefully target neo-Nazi positions, thus minimizing collateral damage. They largely succeeded, with the obvious exception of the industrial area around the Azov Steelworks.
     
    Now let's take an actual quick lookaround how the "functioning" city with "minimal collateral damage" (according to various Kremlin shills) really fared NOT in industrial areas, but in other city parts quite far from Azovstal:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h9HgZv4lk_o

    Replies: @A123, @Mr. Hack

  719. @Bashibuzuk
    @Mr. Hack


    nationalities that would develop including both Romanians and Ukrainians.
     
    Cucuteni - Tripolye >>> Globular Amphora Culture >>> mix with Corded Ware folks >>> Balto - Slav >>> Arkaim Sintashta >>> Indo - Aryan & Avestan Aryan >>> mix with Afanasievo Okunevo folks >>> Botaï Culture folks >>> Finno-Ugric (through Seima Turbino, Akozino-Malar and Sargat Culture), Turkic (through Tagar and Karasuk Culture) and Altaic populations.

    Cucuteni - Tripolye >>> Globular Amphora Culture >>> mix with Corded Ware folks >>> mix with Bell Beaker folks >>> Unetice Culture >>> Celts, Dacians, Thracian, Illyrian, Getae etc.

    I don't see Ukrainian and Romanian nations among these people.

    😉

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    They came later…they weren’t just seeded on earth from outer space in flying saucers. 🙂

    • Replies: @Bashibuzuk
    @Mr. Hack

    They're what is called in Russian новодел. Wallachian became Romanian, and Rusyn/Ruthenian became Ukrainian in nineteenth century. And they're already on the cusp of extinction through anemic demography and emigration. Something didn't work right...

    Both Romanians and Ukrainians like to say it was their Socialist experience that brought them to this sad state of ephemeral nation-statehood. But I have another explanation, a more esoteric one (I like esoteric explanations). They are dying as the RusFed is dying and the Globalized West (including the Extreme Oriental dominions - Japan and Korea) and China are dying because of apostasy. Apostasy to the spiritual traditions of their ancestors. They have cut the spiritual chain that goes to the beginnings of their bloodlines. So did Iranians whose demography is in free fall too.

    But Arabs, Jews, most Black people and Hindustani people grow and multiply because they are still well aligned with their ancestral beliefs. To kill a people, first one needs to kill their gods. The more extreme the apostasy and the more rapid the eventual extinction. The meek shall not inherit the earth, they shall become self-centered and stop having babies. Their lands and their riches will be given to their more aggressive masters. That's "esoteric biology" for you Mr Hack.

    😉

    Replies: @Dmitry

  720. @Beckow
    @Mikel


    ...no choice but to start this catastrophic war
     
    It is not my 'claim', I explained what the security situation looked like from their point of view. You didn't address it, instead you said that 'doing nothing' would have been better. You fail to provide an example when a major power in the same situation would do nothing.

    like me saying that NATO had no other choice but to depose Gadhafi or bomb Yugoslavia
     
    You can say whatever you wish, but it is on its face a meaningless comparison regarding security. Even theoretical claims by Nato for threats from Yugoslavia and Libya (or Iraq, Syria) were an order of magnitude less serious and they were largely made up. There is no real comparison: Nato was actively moving into Ukraine and they were not going there to play bocce-ball with the locals. Finally address that point - all else is noise.

    obviously willing to cause massive casualties and damage to civilians in pursuit of his goals.
     
    Big countries are like that. Nato caused massive casualties and damage to civilian infrastructure with not a peep from the official Western media, literati or anyone who matters. Ok, some peeps, but in a tightly controlled environment. About the same as the anti-war demos in Russia now.

    The catastrophic hubris of Nato claiming that they can do whatever they dream off, bomb, kill, lie, occupy, build bases, change borders, etc...is the root cause of this war. No rational observer believes that without Nato destruction of Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya...this war would be taking place. Do you understand the meaning of a 'precedent'?

    Let's see who wins, but it is too late for anyone in the West to belly-ache that 'wars are bloody'. Yes, they are, Nato has shown us again and again. I recall they were rewarded.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Mikel

    Have you read any of the firsthand stories from Sarajevo during the good old days of the Bill Clinton administration?

    They had the the portrait of the Serbian president on the cover of Time magazine with the headline Face of Evil.

    Sow wind reap whirlwind . . .

  721. …Sow wind reap whirlwind . . .

    I recall some of it. There was the famous “we can turn Serbia into Middle Ages, 14th century? you want more?“…killing civilians, destroying infrastructure, boasting and threatening to do more, the media were cheering it on: more bombs, show them what we can do to them, they were giddy with excitement that Nato could bomb basically defenseless country. What a thrill to murder the Serbs.

    Nobody ever worried about the dead, nobody talked about ‘brutal bombing of civilians’, it was all ok, they celebrated themselves. Now suddenly it is the worst crime of the century. Who are these people? Are they completely narcissistic or do they have the maturity of 10-year olds?

    And the weasly “don’t talk about it, it is what-aboutism, two wrongs don’t make it right, blabla…”. When all is lost the desperate: “well, I personally was against it“…of course that is meaningless and besides the point, we are talking countries not persons. Hypocrisy this cosmic deserves to meet some reality. They just may. Whirlwind indeed.

    Notice how the virtuous crowd here quickly disappears when they are reminded what their side did. They scuttle like rats caught in the light.

  722. Bashibuzuk says:
    @Mr. Hack
    @Bashibuzuk

    They came later...they weren't just seeded on earth from outer space in flying saucers. :-)

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

    They’re what is called in Russian новодел. Wallachian became Romanian, and Rusyn/Ruthenian became Ukrainian in nineteenth century. And they’re already on the cusp of extinction through anemic demography and emigration. Something didn’t work right…

    Both Romanians and Ukrainians like to say it was their Socialist experience that brought them to this sad state of ephemeral nation-statehood. But I have another explanation, a more esoteric one (I like esoteric explanations). They are dying as the RusFed is dying and the Globalized West (including the Extreme Oriental dominions – Japan and Korea) and China are dying because of apostasy. Apostasy to the spiritual traditions of their ancestors. They have cut the spiritual chain that goes to the beginnings of their bloodlines. So did Iranians whose demography is in free fall too.

    But Arabs, Jews, most Black people and Hindustani people grow and multiply because they are still well aligned with their ancestral beliefs. To kill a people, first one needs to kill their gods. The more extreme the apostasy and the more rapid the eventual extinction. The meek shall not inherit the earth, they shall become self-centered and stop having babies. Their lands and their riches will be given to their more aggressive masters. That’s “esoteric biology” for you Mr Hack.

    😉

    • Replies: @Dmitry
    @Bashibuzuk


    Svyatovit (Svantevit) temple

     

    The god with four direction which can be related to the same theme as Brahma.

    grow and multiply because they are still well aligned with their ancestral
     
    In a few years, people have grown and multiply thousand times more than the normal number in the majority of species history.

    https://i.imgur.com/CYQGXNP.png

    This is the combination with technology (the cause of the vast population boom) surely a main cause of our psychological disillusioning of the last few centuries.

    With this population overgrowth, you would assume more like species wisdom to reduce the birthrate will be naturally, or there would be something like nuclear war unnaturally to reduce the overgrowth.

    You would assume more spiritual people connected to the species wisdom, would be reducing birthrate naturally, as continued population growth could only result in an unnatural disaster to reduce the overgrowth like nuclear wars. .

    If bacteria will have overgrowth like this in the close laboratory jar, it would change external conditions to destroy the whole group of bacteria.

    In human psychology terms, it's not very romantic, when land has been converted to car parking and logistics warehouses.

    You can say the problem with the particular type of industrial culture (that you dislike Amazon or capitalism or communism), but it's more for all of the human history until the last few minutes, we were always surrounded with nonpopulated, nonagriculture, nonhuman spaces with the undamaged forests, living in societies with a few dozen people.


    Arabs, Jews, most Black people and Hindustani people grow and multiply because they are still well aligned with their ancestral beliefs. To kill a people, first one needs to kill their gods.

     

    I don't think today birthrates correlated negatively with the level of spiritual destruction of the community or the tribe.

    For example, Tuvans have one of the highest birthrate in Russia. Of course, not officially written, but you can infer from regional variation in Russia. https://rg.ru/2020/09/09/reg-skfo/nazvany-regiony-s-samoj-vysokoj-rozhdaemostiu-i-smertnostiu.html

    Every community in Russia and all the postsoviet space is relatively spiritually broken. But Tuvans have been really a spiritually broken and destroyed community, perhaps the most spiritually broken nationality in the region.

    Similarly, especially before abortion was promoted, African Americans have until recently always a higher birthrate than average Americans. But the African Americans have been one of the groups most broken by the modernity, with their gods and spirituality surviving only by translation to the culture of their European slave owners.

    You know, the classic symptoms of being spiritually broken people, like the Native Americans and Tuvans - you can only see alcohol shops in some of the ghettos. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cGuDPcjaVo0.

    -


    As for Haredi Jews, like Amish, they have a highbirth rate, in our current context mainly because they are in a cult living in a developed countries, which bans birthcontrol. So, birthrate correlates with religious conformism in this recent context.

    But before recent invention of birthcontrol (and in third world countries today), historically, people have children as the inevitable result of lust. You cannot follow lust, without resulting children.

    Having children is the inevitable result of lust and also evidence of lust. Therefore, there were anti-natalist religions like Christianity in New Testament and first millennium, as having children is a sign of lust which is viewed negatively, and which for Paul can only be a second best option.

    In Christianity, the more spiritual people, would historically become celibate, like most saints in the last couple millennium, most clergy, monks, nuns, which is said as the best option directly by Paul. Excluding not just some extreme people like Origen, level of your spirituality or religious conformism would negatively correlate with the number of your children and they constructed monasteries all around Europe that allow the childless, semi-nonworking people to have the sometimes utopian community. And of course, in Buddhism the similar tradition.

    It's because Christianity has viewed lust as negative and having children is a compromise only for someone who cannot control their lust (as Paul writes directly).

    Replies: @Coconuts

  723. @A123
    @Wokechoke


    Mariupol is the single example of a grinding Urban fight that the Russians accepted.
     
    Russia wanted to save Mariupol as a functioning city. The advance was slow to carefully target neo-Nazi positions, thus minimizing collateral damage. They largely succeeded, with the obvious exception of the industrial area around the Azov Steelworks.

    Russian residents of Mariupol have fresh water, electricity, functioning sewers, etc. The city is currently more livable than Kiev.
    _____

    Any city that Russia does not believe they will be able to permanently retain will be treated differently. Breaking infrastructure that the enemy will have to rebuild is part of warfare.

    The Ukie-stan terror attack on the Kerch Bridge means everything is in play. Strikes on heating during bitterly cold days of Jan/Feb could paralyze Lviv, and other cities, well away from the front lines.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @sudden death

    Pro-Putin sympathizer, kremlinstoogeA123, again trying to paint a rosy picture of Mariupol. I don’t see any residents of Kyiv packing up and leaving to live in the “more livable Mariupol than Kyiv”.

    He should watch this new documentary that is opening up in New York city today, to get a better understanding of what happened in Mariupol:

    Former Vice President Pence got it right when he recently stated:

    I know there is a rising chorus in our party, including some new voices to our movement, who would have us disengage with the wider world, and abandon the traditional values of the heart of our movement,” Pence said Wednesday. “But appeasement has never worked, ever, in history. And now more than ever we need a conservative movement committed to America’s role as leader of the free world and as a vanguard of American values.” Pence on Wednesday called Russia’s invasion “unconscionable,” and he urged conservatives to push back against Russian President Vladimir Putin. “There can be no room in the conservative movement for apologists for Putin,” Pence said. “There is only room in this movement for champions of freedom.”

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @Mr. Hack

    This is the clip that I wanted to include above, although the one that is shown is interesting too. This is the trailer for the documentary that is currently being shown in New York:

    https://youtu.be/Ts_8K8VuF5o

    Replies: @QCIC

  724. @Mr. Hack
    @A123

    Pro-Putin sympathizer, kremlinstoogeA123, again trying to paint a rosy picture of Mariupol. I don't see any residents of Kyiv packing up and leaving to live in the "more livable Mariupol than Kyiv".

    He should watch this new documentary that is opening up in New York city today, to get a better understanding of what happened in Mariupol:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NeLqj9JMrxw&feature=emb_rel_end

    Former Vice President Pence got it right when he recently stated:


    I know there is a rising chorus in our party, including some new voices to our movement, who would have us disengage with the wider world, and abandon the traditional values of the heart of our movement,” Pence said Wednesday. “But appeasement has never worked, ever, in history. And now more than ever we need a conservative movement committed to America’s role as leader of the free world and as a vanguard of American values.” Pence on Wednesday called Russia’s invasion “unconscionable,” and he urged conservatives to push back against Russian President Vladimir Putin. “There can be no room in the conservative movement for apologists for Putin,” Pence said. “There is only room in this movement for champions of freedom.”

     

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    This is the clip that I wanted to include above, although the one that is shown is interesting too. This is the trailer for the documentary that is currently being shown in New York:

    • Replies: @QCIC
    @Mr. Hack

    Azovstal was a heavily fortified installation only about 30 miles from the Russian border. I was surprised how little this point was discussed. I am also surprised that people do not recognize this location was a big deal for Russia. I imagine there are similar emplacements near Kharkiv which are at least as bad in this combination of military presence and proximity to the border.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

  725. @Beckow
    @Mikel


    ...no choice but to start this catastrophic war
     
    It is not my 'claim', I explained what the security situation looked like from their point of view. You didn't address it, instead you said that 'doing nothing' would have been better. You fail to provide an example when a major power in the same situation would do nothing.

    like me saying that NATO had no other choice but to depose Gadhafi or bomb Yugoslavia
     
    You can say whatever you wish, but it is on its face a meaningless comparison regarding security. Even theoretical claims by Nato for threats from Yugoslavia and Libya (or Iraq, Syria) were an order of magnitude less serious and they were largely made up. There is no real comparison: Nato was actively moving into Ukraine and they were not going there to play bocce-ball with the locals. Finally address that point - all else is noise.

    obviously willing to cause massive casualties and damage to civilians in pursuit of his goals.
     
    Big countries are like that. Nato caused massive casualties and damage to civilian infrastructure with not a peep from the official Western media, literati or anyone who matters. Ok, some peeps, but in a tightly controlled environment. About the same as the anti-war demos in Russia now.

    The catastrophic hubris of Nato claiming that they can do whatever they dream off, bomb, kill, lie, occupy, build bases, change borders, etc...is the root cause of this war. No rational observer believes that without Nato destruction of Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya...this war would be taking place. Do you understand the meaning of a 'precedent'?

    Let's see who wins, but it is too late for anyone in the West to belly-ache that 'wars are bloody'. Yes, they are, Nato has shown us again and again. I recall they were rewarded.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Mikel

    obviously willing to cause massive casualties and damage to civilians in pursuit of his goals.

    Big countries are like that.

    So why do you complain about the massive casualties caused by the US? It is a big country, like Russia. It has “no choice” but to act like that, according to your logic.

    You may protest the idea that you are supporting and justifying Russia’s carnage as much as you want but that’s exactly what you have chosen to do here, as if for some reason you also had no personal choice but to always side with the Kremlin.

    And we’ve clearly entered the phase of diminishing returns in this conversation. I don’t think I am going to have any more success getting you to admit any wrongdoing by the Kremlin than getting Sher Singh to start eating beef.

    • Agree: Mr. Hack
  726. @Mr. Hack
    @Mr. Hack

    This is the clip that I wanted to include above, although the one that is shown is interesting too. This is the trailer for the documentary that is currently being shown in New York:

    https://youtu.be/Ts_8K8VuF5o

    Replies: @QCIC

    Azovstal was a heavily fortified installation only about 30 miles from the Russian border. I was surprised how little this point was discussed. I am also surprised that people do not recognize this location was a big deal for Russia. I imagine there are similar emplacements near Kharkiv which are at least as bad in this combination of military presence and proximity to the border.

    • Troll: S
    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @QCIC

    what's the point of Kharkov if it isn't a border town trading with Belgorod?

    Replies: @QCIC

  727. @Wokechoke
    @LondonBob

    Mariupol is the single example of a grinding Urban fight that the Russians accepted.

    Replies: @A123, @AnonfromTN

    It was not RF alone, it was RF plus DPR plus LPR. The United forces not only accepted but won having fewer people than Ukies.
    When I come back, I intend to write a brief summary of my trip that included Moscow, Lugansk, and an average Russian provincial city of Penza. Quite informative.

    • Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
    @AnonfromTN

    It has been a while but I know of at least one instance of Ron transferring a comment to the top left article placement on the front page. It was some anon commenter who had all this inside dope on biological weapons back in the first weeks of the virus brouhaha.

    , @Philip Owen
    @AnonfromTN

    Ukrainian had fewer troops until mid August.

    I know Penza somewhat. A cluster for various types of food manufacturing including confectionery. (needs sugar and cocoa).

  728. @A123
    @Sean




    if Russia gets any kind of a win out of Ukraine … [the U.S.] would have to seriously prepare to fight Russia.
     
    Not-The-President Biden cannot obtain the necessary Authorization for Use of Military Force [AUMF] for direct involvement in Ukraine. Without an AUMF, there is no U.S.-Russia fight to prepare for.
     

    There is a lot the US can and will do without actually becoming a combatant.

     
    That is a 180° about face of your prior stance. Which is your position -- The U.S. will be:

    • In direct, "serious" combat with Russia
    • Not actually become a combatant, no "serious" combat with Russia

    You cannot have it both ways.
    ___

    The Ukraine is geographically expansive. Assimilating 1/2 to 1/3 (or even 1/4) of that land will keep Russia busy for years.

    Don’t try an tell me Putin will push further. Your idea that this is the first domino in a cascade of multiple nations is absurd, inconceivable, and wholly ludicrous.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @Sean

    Don’t try an tell me Putin will push further.

    Just before the invasion Putin gave his demands to call it off, and these concerned the removal of certain Nato bases in Poland and other current full members of Nato. So letting him get what he could call a win would give him far more weight in the aforementioned demands.

    Which is your position — The U.S. will be:

    • In direct, “serious” combat with Russia
    • Not actually become a combatant, no “serious” combat with Russia

    Ukraine is the last place that America would chose to fight Russia even indirectly. However, America has to do something and supplying arms is relatively cheap, and has been astoundingly effective. I cannot see the US or Russia engaging in direct hostilities. It suits both to fight each other in proxy wars in other people’s countries. Direct America-Russia conventional hostilities woud be to clear a path to the first rung of the thermonuclear weapon ladder up to a strategic exchange of specimen strikes hitting Los Angeles and St Petersburg .

    • Agree: Johnny Rico
  729. @AnonfromTN
    @Wokechoke

    It was not RF alone, it was RF plus DPR plus LPR. The United forces not only accepted but won having fewer people than Ukies.
    When I come back, I intend to write a brief summary of my trip that included Moscow, Lugansk, and an average Russian provincial city of Penza. Quite informative.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Philip Owen

    It has been a while but I know of at least one instance of Ron transferring a comment to the top left article placement on the front page. It was some anon commenter who had all this inside dope on biological weapons back in the first weeks of the virus brouhaha.

  730. Gonzalo Lira’s round table 33 is a hoot.

    The topic for discussion: WTF is going on with Euro economy controlled demolition?

    Tom Luongo & Alex Krainer. The people who know what is going on aren’t talking. It seems like a Great Reset move with the Euros taking the plunge. The Fed is double crossing those guys with the interest rate jack which will destroy the Euro economy in an uncontrolled demolition.

    Hoo boy.

    Maybe it’s a good thing Biden has lost his wits.

    • Replies: @A123
    @Emil Nikola Richard

    I posted that exact meme to kick off OT199

    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-199/#comment-559260


    The Fed is double crossing those guys with the interest rate jack
     
    There is no "double crossing". The Fed has few obligations to Europe (e.g. Swap Lines) and has kept 100% of those commitments. The U.S. Fed is doing what little it can to save itself from European folly.

    which will destroy the Euro economy in an uncontrolled demolition.
     
    Europe's Green Parties did this to themselves. Yes. Not-The-President Biden has fouled up American energy policy. But the Greens in Europe are even worse. This is not economic policy inflation. They have true industrial collapse inflation.

    Add to that... The EuroZone makes no sense. There can be no currency union without a fiscal union. Germany has extracted massive amounts of wealth from the rest of the EZ, especially Italy and Spain.

     
    https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F4699970c-b972-4ac8-ae8e-b0020f56b287_1571x1157.jpeg
     

    Now the bill is due. The German ECB in Frankfurt has to transfer jobs and economic activity to Italy and Spain so that gap can close. The problem is the German Greens under Scholz have destroyed that wealth.

    German Elite Bankers created this mess. The only ways out are:

    -1- Germany voluntarily leaves the Euro
    -2- All EZ members end the Euro in a coordinated manner
    -3- The Euro blows up messily

    Given the intransigence of German Greens, #3 seems far too likely. It is obviously the worst choice, but the German ECB lakes the sanity to change course.

    PEACE 😇
    , @Barbarossa
    @Emil Nikola Richard

    Word on the street is that we have 10% mortgage interest rates by new years. I haven't looked into it so I don't know if that's BS or not. If it gets that high it should make things spicy.

    I know that we had a peak of around 18% mortgage rates in the early 80's but even lower level increases like we are seeing should be much more disruptive since we are much more debt reliant now.

    Replies: @A123

  731. No leaves bad for artillery, which cannot hide from drones. Rain is bad for drones and mud leaves tell tale tracks and makes rapid repositioning to escape counter battery fire hard for wheeled verhicles so artillery stops firing for lack of accurate targeting.

    Late summer ideal for sneaky infiltration offensive of concentrations assembled under concealment. Winter would seem to be a good time for a mass attack

    Vladimir Zhabotinsky* of Kherson, founder of the Self-Defense Organization in Odessa. “We were not created in order to teach morals and manners to our enemies.”

    *(AKA Ze’ev Ze’ev Jabotinsky:”We take as our starting point the Yid (used here as pejorative for Jew) of today, and try to imagine in our minds his exact opposite. Let us erase from that picture all the personality traits that are so typical of a Yid, and let us insert into it all the desirable traits whose absence is so typical in him. Because the Yid is ugly, sickly, and lacks handsomeness (הדרת פנים) we shall endow the ideal image of the Hebrew with masculine beauty, stature, massive shoulders, vigorous movements, bright colors, and shades of color. The Yid is frightened and downtrodden; the Hebrew ought to be proud and independent. The Yid is disgusting to all; the Hebrew should charm all. The Yid has accepted submission; the Hebrew ought to know how to command.” Kind of like Trotsky

    https://www.marxists.org/history/etol/newspape/themilitant/1941/v05n34/trotsky.htm

    “It is difficult to predict the extent of self-government which the man of the future may reach or the heights to which he may carry his technique. Social construction and psycho-physical self-education will become two aspects of one and the same process. All the arts – literature, drama, painting, music and architecture will lend this process beautiful form. More correctly, the shell in which the cultural construction and self-education of Communist man will be enclosed, will develop all the vital elements of contemporary art to the highest point. Man will become immeasurably stronger, wiser and subtler; his body will become more harmonized, his movements more rhythmic, his voice more musical. The forms of life will become dynamically dramatic. The average human type will rise to the heights of an Aristotle, a Goethe, or a Marx. And above this ridge new peaks will rise”

    • Thanks: Johnny Rico
  732. @Emil Nikola Richard
    Gonzalo Lira's round table 33 is a hoot.

    The topic for discussion: WTF is going on with Euro economy controlled demolition?

    Tom Luongo & Alex Krainer. The people who know what is going on aren't talking. It seems like a Great Reset move with the Euros taking the plunge. The Fed is double crossing those guys with the interest rate jack which will destroy the Euro economy in an uncontrolled demolition.

    Hoo boy.

    Maybe it's a good thing Biden has lost his wits.

    https://i0.wp.com/tomluongo.me/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/UN-vs.-Fed-1.png

    Replies: @A123, @Barbarossa

    I posted that exact meme to kick off OT199

    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-199/#comment-559260

    The Fed is double crossing those guys with the interest rate jack

    There is no “double crossing”. The Fed has few obligations to Europe (e.g. Swap Lines) and has kept 100% of those commitments. The U.S. Fed is doing what little it can to save itself from European folly.

    which will destroy the Euro economy in an uncontrolled demolition.

    Europe’s Green Parties did this to themselves. Yes. Not-The-President Biden has fouled up American energy policy. But the Greens in Europe are even worse. This is not economic policy inflation. They have true industrial collapse inflation.

    Add to that… The EuroZone makes no sense. There can be no currency union without a fiscal union. Germany has extracted massive amounts of wealth from the rest of the EZ, especially Italy and Spain.

     

     

    Now the bill is due. The German ECB in Frankfurt has to transfer jobs and economic activity to Italy and Spain so that gap can close. The problem is the German Greens under Scholz have destroyed that wealth.

    German Elite Bankers created this mess. The only ways out are:

    -1- Germany voluntarily leaves the Euro
    -2- All EZ members end the Euro in a coordinated manner
    -3- The Euro blows up messily

    Given the intransigence of German Greens, #3 seems far too likely. It is obviously the worst choice, but the German ECB lakes the sanity to change course.

    PEACE 😇

  733. @Yahya
    @songbird


    I swear I can detect a precipitous drop in the quality of French fries, and I believe it is due to inflation and/or supply issues.
     
    It probably has more to do with increased diversity in America than supply chain issues or the like. Hispanic potatoe farmers tend to have less moist hands that white farmers, that's why the potatoes come out wrong. I'm sure blacks are to blame as well for these low-quality potatoes. Haven't figured out precisely how yet though.

    Replies: @Matra, @Philip Owen

    Mexicans have been picking Idaho potatoes since the late 1970s at least. Seasonal workers rather than migrants.

  734. @AnonfromTN
    @Wokechoke

    It was not RF alone, it was RF plus DPR plus LPR. The United forces not only accepted but won having fewer people than Ukies.
    When I come back, I intend to write a brief summary of my trip that included Moscow, Lugansk, and an average Russian provincial city of Penza. Quite informative.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Philip Owen

    Ukrainian had fewer troops until mid August.

    I know Penza somewhat. A cluster for various types of food manufacturing including confectionery. (needs sugar and cocoa).

  735. @Mikel
    @Philip Owen


    There is still no NATO intervention in Ukraine
     
    Well yes, if we exclude the $40+ billion military aid sent (similar to the total Russian annual military budget), the training of Ukrainian troops, the provision of real time intelligence and the more than likely US and UK boots on the ground (not counting the many volunteers with NATO military training fighting along with the Ukrainians) then you are right, there's no NATO intervention in Ukraine.

    Replies: @Wokechoke, @Philip Owen

    That’s not NATO. That’s the US and UK fulfilling their Budapest Memorandum obligations as Russia knew they should.

    Russia claims 83 HIMARS destroyed. The US sent 14 with 2 more later. Just perhaps, Ukrainian is using dummies?

  736. @Bashibuzuk
    @Seraphim

    Less than 2% of Russians go to Church on a regular basis. Less than 20% ethnic Russian youths under 18 years old self-identify as strongly religious. And there is a good reason for that.



    They see the hypocrisy of the Church. They see how its higher hierarchy is profiteering and living in a boastful opulence, while its lowest ranks in small villages in the dying RusFed hinterland are having a hard time getting by.

    Some of my ancestors were Orthodox Priests. But they have already left the Church service before the first Revolution of 1905. Why ? Because already in these days it was apparent how hypocrite most Church hierarchy was.

    Saint Seraphim of Sarov (have you chosen your moniker after him) prophesied in the nineteenth century that Church would end up corrupt and that there would be a Revolution and a Civil War. But then he was of Old Believer ancestry himself, and lived his ascetic life in an Old Believer region of the Russian Empire.

    When the February Revolution happened in 1917, the Church prayed for the Revolution and gave its blessings to those who jailed the Czar. They turned their backs on their Emperor, but they made a Saint of him and his family that they left to be killed by the Judeo-Bol'shevik.

    In the 1990ies, they received from Yeltsin's Cabal the right to import alcohol and cigarettes in RusFed taxe-free, and while the desperate people got drunk and died in droves of alcoholism, they sold cigarette to young kids making them addicted to tobacco. Today, on both sides of a fratricidal conflict in Ukraine they give their blessings to Slavs who kill their brothers.

    Your Gundyaev's ROC чернцы are a plague. Same thing about the Constantinople Oecumenic Patriarch's priests in Ukraine and of course the Uniate Papists. A curse on Eastern Slav people all of them. Тьфу на них...

    😇

    Replies: @Seraphim

    The Old Believers were heretical schismatics, carrying on the ‘Raskol’ against Orthodoxy of their predecessors the ‘Judaizers’ (zhidovomudrstvuyushchiye). They actually supported the ‘revolutionaries’ like Bakunin and the ‘narodniks’ who saw and exploited their ‘anti-governmental and revolutionary potential’. Once Tsar Nicholas II issued the Edict of Toleration, allowing them to function freely in Russia, their richest people (very much resembling the ‘oligarchs’) like Savva Morozov (related to the Old Believer ‘martyr’ Feodosia Prokopiyevna Morozova?) started to make significant financial contributions to the Bolshevik faction of the Russian Social Democratic Workers Party, including making payments to the newspaper Iskra. Leninist publications were printed overseas and were imported secretly through the channels of the Old Believers and sectarians. The very origin of the ‘Soviet’ was related to the Bespopovtsy and sectarians like the Dukhobors.
    No Saint Seraphim was not an ‘Old Believer’. He constantly rebuked them.

  737. @A123
    @Wokechoke


    Mariupol is the single example of a grinding Urban fight that the Russians accepted.
     
    Russia wanted to save Mariupol as a functioning city. The advance was slow to carefully target neo-Nazi positions, thus minimizing collateral damage. They largely succeeded, with the obvious exception of the industrial area around the Azov Steelworks.

    Russian residents of Mariupol have fresh water, electricity, functioning sewers, etc. The city is currently more livable than Kiev.
    _____

    Any city that Russia does not believe they will be able to permanently retain will be treated differently. Breaking infrastructure that the enemy will have to rebuild is part of warfare.

    The Ukie-stan terror attack on the Kerch Bridge means everything is in play. Strikes on heating during bitterly cold days of Jan/Feb could paralyze Lviv, and other cities, well away from the front lines.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @sudden death

    Russia wanted to save Mariupol as a functioning city. The advance was slow to carefully target neo-Nazi positions, thus minimizing collateral damage. They largely succeeded, with the obvious exception of the industrial area around the Azov Steelworks.

    Now let’s take an actual quick lookaround how the “functioning” city with “minimal collateral damage” (according to various Kremlin shills) really fared NOT in industrial areas, but in other city parts quite far from Azovstal:

    • Thanks: Mr. Hack
    • Replies: @A123
    @sudden death



    Russia wanted to save Mariupol as a functioning city. The advance was slow to carefully target neo-Nazi positions, thus minimizing collateral damage. They largely succeeded, with the obvious exception of the industrial area around the Azov Steelworks.
     
    Now let’s take an actual quick lookaround how the “functioning” city with “minimal collateral damage” (according to various Kremlin shills) really fared NOT in industrial areas, but in other city parts quite far from Azovstal
     
    Why are you shilling for Ukie violent extremism in such an obvious way?

    There were neo-Nazi Azov's in other parts of the city. Rescuing the natives from Azov thugs involved defeating these hard points while "minimizing collateral damage". There is a huge difference between "minimal" and "zero" that you do not grasp. I am sorry that you are overly emotional.

    Let us look at the facts father than cherry picking. (1)


    MARIUPOL (DPR), July 29 – RIA Novosti.

    Mariupol is fully supplied with water, all pumping stations in the city are connected to electricity, head of the Ministry of Emergency Situations of the DPR Alexei Kostrubitsky told RIA Novosti. ... This allows the townspeople to live “in more or less normal conditions.” “Now construction organizations are actively working to restore Mariupol."
     

    Children are going back to school.

    https://youtu.be/dmJLxi8qCFc

    The war is over in Mariupol, and Putin won.

    Are there issues? Yes. Half the population fled Kiev's thuggish tyranny. Thus, there are intentionally idled areas not being prioritized. Glass is fragile and the idle zone has temporarily boarded up buildings to prevent weather damage. These buildings can be brought back into service as the population returns.

    Is it perfect? Of course not. As long as Ukie terrorists continue truck bombings, things will remain unstable. However, everyone rational grasps that the #1 impediment to a solution is Zelensky's violence and intransigence.
    ___

    In your Ukie Maximalist fantasy:
        • How will Mariupol by retaken by Azov Neo-Nazi's?
        • And, how much if the city will be left standing?

    The last thing the civilians in Mariupol need or want is the return of Kiev's brutal occupation.

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://cmio.org/en/world/751231-mariupol-is-fully-supplied-with-water-the-ministry-of-emergency-situations-of-the-dpr-reported

    Replies: @sudden death

    , @Mr. Hack
    @sudden death


    There is a huge difference between “minimal” and “zero” that you do not grasp. I am sorry that you are overly emotional.
     
    If kremlinstoogeA123 feels that the collateral damage in the areas exposed in the clip that you've included are "minimal", then it's obvious that the guy is 100% flakey and doesn't deserve a place at the table. The guy is a complete kook, IMHO. Once again folks, watch this video and decided for yourselfs and tell me whether it looks like "minimal" damage or something much more sinister and complete?...

    https://youtu.be/h9HgZv4lk_o

  738. US would be better off with a lot more politicians thinking like him:

    The opening is naive on the recent Dem letter to negotiate. In reality, that declaration was pretty much neocon-neolib BS.

  739. @Coconuts
    @Barbarossa


    So why have kids, care about anything but creature comforts, or risk all for a larger ideal when there is another TikTok on queue?
     
    The weird or thought provoking thing about this is maybe that it itself is the fruit of a great revolutionary ideal, the 'Promethean Voluntarism' of the social revolutionaries of the 19th and 20th centuries. The last man type can be seen as the mass product of the diffusion of Sartre's 'existence precedes essence' idea.

    I think a writer and ex-soldier like Drieu, who was preoccupied with the issue of personal and collective decadence in the 1920s and 30s, was drawn into Fascism by awareness of the potential for an outcome like this. That didn't go well for him or in general. But then things like the fall of the USSR and the end of socialism in Western Europe were indications of serious problems with the revolutionary ideals as they mature. These haven't gone away as we can see at the moment.

    Replies: @Barbarossa

    Promethean Voluntarism

    Could you explain a bit more what you mean by this term? Thanks much.

    I understand Fascism as a reaction, but it has the disadvantage of being another centralized statist abstraction, though it borrows and co-opts nostalgic tropes such as “blood and soil” from pre-modern times. Fascism sounds promising on a superficial level but the roots are not there.

    But at this point we are all uprooted to some extent. Even if Sher Singh is operating in an ethno-religious enclave his identity is compromised by the very fact of being in Canada and playing his part in the globalist project. Most of us, myself included, are more atomized yet, which is like going through life handicapped, though most don’t realize that they are even missing anything. But the only real way that I see to recover what is missing is to put down literal roots in a physical place and stand one’s ground. There are a lot of ideologies that promise a shortcut to this process, but I don’t see it.

    indications of serious problems with the revolutionary ideals as they mature.

    I think that perhaps part of the issue is the very speed that the machine ages pushes us. We as human beings or societies have a limited amount of change that we can safely cope with and assimilate. The pace and human movement and information flow in the modern age far outstrip what is possible for some modicum of stability and so we are subject to massive instability. I don’t think the contradictions will resolve, but that the oscillations bill just get more intense and unhinged until something slows us back down to a more human scale. Or perhaps the “archetypal passive nihilist” type is just a coping mechanism on a massive scale to these contradictions. To just give up and abandon oneself to dissipation is certainly an easy way to resolve the rub, but is a self perpetuating and cowardly one.

    • Agree: Bashibuzuk
  740. @sudden death
    @A123


    Russia wanted to save Mariupol as a functioning city. The advance was slow to carefully target neo-Nazi positions, thus minimizing collateral damage. They largely succeeded, with the obvious exception of the industrial area around the Azov Steelworks.
     
    Now let's take an actual quick lookaround how the "functioning" city with "minimal collateral damage" (according to various Kremlin shills) really fared NOT in industrial areas, but in other city parts quite far from Azovstal:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h9HgZv4lk_o

    Replies: @A123, @Mr. Hack

    Russia wanted to save Mariupol as a functioning city. The advance was slow to carefully target neo-Nazi positions, thus minimizing collateral damage. They largely succeeded, with the obvious exception of the industrial area around the Azov Steelworks.

    Now let’s take an actual quick lookaround how the “functioning” city with “minimal collateral damage” (according to various Kremlin shills) really fared NOT in industrial areas, but in other city parts quite far from Azovstal

    Why are you shilling for Ukie violent extremism in such an obvious way?

    There were neo-Nazi Azov’s in other parts of the city. Rescuing the natives from Azov thugs involved defeating these hard points while “minimizing collateral damage”. There is a huge difference between “minimal” and “zero” that you do not grasp. I am sorry that you are overly emotional.

    Let us look at the facts father than cherry picking. (1)

    MARIUPOL (DPR), July 29 – RIA Novosti.

    Mariupol is fully supplied with water, all pumping stations in the city are connected to electricity, head of the Ministry of Emergency Situations of the DPR Alexei Kostrubitsky told RIA Novosti. … This allows the townspeople to live “in more or less normal conditions.” “Now construction organizations are actively working to restore Mariupol.”

    Children are going back to school.

    The war is over in Mariupol, and Putin won.

    Are there issues? Yes. Half the population fled Kiev’s thuggish tyranny. Thus, there are intentionally idled areas not being prioritized. Glass is fragile and the idle zone has temporarily boarded up buildings to prevent weather damage. These buildings can be brought back into service as the population returns.

    Is it perfect? Of course not. As long as Ukie terrorists continue truck bombings, things will remain unstable. However, everyone rational grasps that the #1 impediment to a solution is Zelensky’s violence and intransigence.
    ___

    In your Ukie Maximalist fantasy:
        • How will Mariupol by retaken by Azov Neo-Nazi’s?
        • And, how much if the city will be left standing?

    The last thing the civilians in Mariupol need or want is the return of Kiev’s brutal occupation.

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://cmio.org/en/world/751231-mariupol-is-fully-supplied-with-water-the-ministry-of-emergency-situations-of-the-dpr-reported

    • Replies: @sudden death
    @A123


    Are there issues? Yes. Half the population fled Kiev’s thuggish tyranny. Thus, there are intentionally idled areas not being prioritized.
     
    How does "tyranny" still have influence over Mariupols residents lives if Putin won - are you really telling they're fleeing from Kiev while being under Putin's rule, lol

    btw, while being under UA rule during 2014-2021, population of Mariupol contracted from 456k to 434k, that is about 5%, not 50%.

    https://www.macrotrends.net/cities/22778/mariupol/population

    Half the Mariupol population is really gone now though, because they were killed or fled when indiscriminate and murderous shelling and airbombing of civilian residential living quarters started there by RF army at 02.24.2022 and continued relentlessly next several months.

    Replies: @A123

  741. @Bashibuzuk
    @Seraphim

    You don’t get it Vlakh. But I did not really expect you would. That is because you are cut from your spiritual bloodline and have been turned into a spiritual slave. You have deprived your illustrious ancestry of their spiritual posterity. You are a spiritual eunuch and a spiritual mankurt.



    Regarding the чернцы, did you know that the ancient Rus warrior elite, although recently baptized, considered it a very bed omen meeting one of these monks while going towards battle? They sometimes preferred to kill him on sight if they met one, to prevent their meeting from bringing a bad fortune to the fight.

    Why would that be?

    Because these black - clothed monks were carriers of a foreign manipulative and toxic spiritual tradition, of which you are a victim.

    http://www.grazdanin-gazeta.ru/archive/2015/sentyabr-2015/20-24-sentyabrya-2015/1001/

    Here, you have a story among many of our ancestors interactions with your faith.

    Where are our proud Princes today ?

    Where are our wise Priests who could kill a Prince outright if he betrayed his folks ?

    But your black - clothed monks are still here, praying for whomever gives them power to enslave. They prayed for Caesars, prayed for Basileis, prayed for Great Princes, Tatar Khans and Otroman Sultans then Russian Czars and Emperors.

    They have prayed for Stalin, who was killing thousands among them, prayed for Hitler, then Yeltsin and Putin and their regime which is depriving Russian people of their wealth to the point of depopulation, and now in Ukraine they probably already pray for NATO.

    When the final Kali Yauga comes, most of them will pray for the Antichrist.

    That's spiritual opportunism in its purest form.

    Of course they are not all like that, the Old Believer ones were better people. But only because they kept some Old Faith honor in their acting. That's why their brothers in faith killed and burned them.

    Go pray for the final salvation of Israel, Vlakh!

    😇

    Replies: @Barbarossa

    Christianity went wrong the minute it began owning property and becoming a political force. It was the exact opposite of living “in spirit and in truth” and the Churches have indeed become often worse than the Pharisees that Jesus defied.

    But I don’t think that Jesus ever intended for a religion to be instituted. It was supposed to be beyond mere religion.

    Christianity did best when it didn’t replace the pre-Christian beliefs but augmented them. As my old mentor put it referring to old Celtic Christianity; Christianity was grafted onto a healthy pagan root-stock. Such can never be left alone though since they pose a threat to the centralizers and power mongers.

    • Agree: Bashibuzuk
  742. @A123
    @sudden death



    Russia wanted to save Mariupol as a functioning city. The advance was slow to carefully target neo-Nazi positions, thus minimizing collateral damage. They largely succeeded, with the obvious exception of the industrial area around the Azov Steelworks.
     
    Now let’s take an actual quick lookaround how the “functioning” city with “minimal collateral damage” (according to various Kremlin shills) really fared NOT in industrial areas, but in other city parts quite far from Azovstal
     
    Why are you shilling for Ukie violent extremism in such an obvious way?

    There were neo-Nazi Azov's in other parts of the city. Rescuing the natives from Azov thugs involved defeating these hard points while "minimizing collateral damage". There is a huge difference between "minimal" and "zero" that you do not grasp. I am sorry that you are overly emotional.

    Let us look at the facts father than cherry picking. (1)


    MARIUPOL (DPR), July 29 – RIA Novosti.

    Mariupol is fully supplied with water, all pumping stations in the city are connected to electricity, head of the Ministry of Emergency Situations of the DPR Alexei Kostrubitsky told RIA Novosti. ... This allows the townspeople to live “in more or less normal conditions.” “Now construction organizations are actively working to restore Mariupol."
     

    Children are going back to school.

    https://youtu.be/dmJLxi8qCFc

    The war is over in Mariupol, and Putin won.

    Are there issues? Yes. Half the population fled Kiev's thuggish tyranny. Thus, there are intentionally idled areas not being prioritized. Glass is fragile and the idle zone has temporarily boarded up buildings to prevent weather damage. These buildings can be brought back into service as the population returns.

    Is it perfect? Of course not. As long as Ukie terrorists continue truck bombings, things will remain unstable. However, everyone rational grasps that the #1 impediment to a solution is Zelensky's violence and intransigence.
    ___

    In your Ukie Maximalist fantasy:
        • How will Mariupol by retaken by Azov Neo-Nazi's?
        • And, how much if the city will be left standing?

    The last thing the civilians in Mariupol need or want is the return of Kiev's brutal occupation.

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://cmio.org/en/world/751231-mariupol-is-fully-supplied-with-water-the-ministry-of-emergency-situations-of-the-dpr-reported

    Replies: @sudden death

    Are there issues? Yes. Half the population fled Kiev’s thuggish tyranny. Thus, there are intentionally idled areas not being prioritized.

    How does “tyranny” still have influence over Mariupols residents lives if Putin won – are you really telling they’re fleeing from Kiev while being under Putin’s rule, lol

    btw, while being under UA rule during 2014-2021, population of Mariupol contracted from 456k to 434k, that is about 5%, not 50%.

    https://www.macrotrends.net/cities/22778/mariupol/population

    Half the Mariupol population is really gone now though, because they were killed or fled when indiscriminate and murderous shelling and airbombing of civilian residential living quarters started there by RF army at 02.24.2022 and continued relentlessly next several months.

    • Replies: @A123
    @sudden death



    As long as Ukie terrorists continue truck bombings, things will remain unstable.
     
    How does “tyranny” still have influence over Mariupols residents lives if Putin won
     
    Are you seriously asking how Pali/Ukie suicide truck bombers can be a threat even though their side has lost?

    Really?

    How can that not be self evident?

    PEACE 😇

     
    https://i.pinimg.com/originals/1d/ce/be/1dcebe7d228212ff4ff444746274383a.jpg

    Replies: @sudden death, @Mr. Hack

  743. @sudden death
    @A123


    Are there issues? Yes. Half the population fled Kiev’s thuggish tyranny. Thus, there are intentionally idled areas not being prioritized.
     
    How does "tyranny" still have influence over Mariupols residents lives if Putin won - are you really telling they're fleeing from Kiev while being under Putin's rule, lol

    btw, while being under UA rule during 2014-2021, population of Mariupol contracted from 456k to 434k, that is about 5%, not 50%.

    https://www.macrotrends.net/cities/22778/mariupol/population

    Half the Mariupol population is really gone now though, because they were killed or fled when indiscriminate and murderous shelling and airbombing of civilian residential living quarters started there by RF army at 02.24.2022 and continued relentlessly next several months.

    Replies: @A123

    As long as Ukie terrorists continue truck bombings, things will remain unstable.

    How does “tyranny” still have influence over Mariupols residents lives if Putin won

    Are you seriously asking how Pali/Ukie suicide truck bombers can be a threat even though their side has lost?

    Really?

    How can that not be self evident?

    PEACE 😇

     

    • Replies: @sudden death
    @A123

    lol, how many "suicide trucks" so far there were used within the cities anywhere by UA?

    Even if we somehow managed to assume it is clear and present danger within the cities, not just paranoid and desperate Kremlinite fantasies, why should Mariupol be the goal atm when way nearer and more strategically important Melitopol, Berdyansk and Kherson are not yet cleared from RF occupational forces in there?;)

    , @Mr. Hack
    @A123

    What really "hurts" are the stupid comments that you keep on making here, where Mariupol is a symbol of Russian benign victory and Ukraine has lost. The only real loser is your your fellow traveler and Putin sympathizer, Blake Masters. If he weren't such a putin sympathizer like you are, I might even vote for him. Former Vice President Pence got it completely correct when he recently stated:

    “There can be no room in the conservative movement for apologists for Putin,” Pence said. “There is only room in this movement for champions of freedom.”


    He had slugs like you, Blake Masters and Tucker Carlson in mind when he made this statement.

    https://www.gannett-cdn.com/presto/2022/03/20/PPYD/77cb569a-a2bf-4db8-ab53-2ea291897e28-261185.jpg

    Replies: @Matra

  744. @A123
    @sudden death



    As long as Ukie terrorists continue truck bombings, things will remain unstable.
     
    How does “tyranny” still have influence over Mariupols residents lives if Putin won
     
    Are you seriously asking how Pali/Ukie suicide truck bombers can be a threat even though their side has lost?

    Really?

    How can that not be self evident?

    PEACE 😇

     
    https://i.pinimg.com/originals/1d/ce/be/1dcebe7d228212ff4ff444746274383a.jpg

    Replies: @sudden death, @Mr. Hack

    lol, how many “suicide trucks” so far there were used within the cities anywhere by UA?

    Even if we somehow managed to assume it is clear and present danger within the cities, not just paranoid and desperate Kremlinite fantasies, why should Mariupol be the goal atm when way nearer and more strategically important Melitopol, Berdyansk and Kherson are not yet cleared from RF occupational forces in there?;)

    • LOL: A123
  745. @Bashibuzuk
    @LatW

    In Old Slavonic they would have said "Аз есмь". Which anyone who would have read the Bible and the Gospels in Russian would immediately recognize.


    Итак, если Господь есть Тот, Кто поистине существует, то что же есть человек сам по себе? Это нам показал апостол Петр в своем ответе служанке первосвященника. После взятия Христа под стражу ближайший ученик впадает в состояние, которое на языке православных молитв называется «окамененным нечувствием». Пред читателем Евангелия предстает человек, который хочет скрыться, остаться неузнанным, возможно даже – исчезнуть, испариться, аннигилироваться, одним словом – не быть.
     

    Бог есть Сущий. Он имеет жизнь в Самом Себе (Ин. 5,26). Человек, как и весь мир, создан из ничего и не имеет автономного источника существования. Он существует только в меру причастности к Богу. Вне Бога – вне жизни. Если человек не утверждается на незыблемом фундаменте божественного Аз есмь, он не только соскальзывает в бездну небытия, в бездну своего изначального ничто. Он не может даже дать внятное обоснование своему собственному существованию, которое представляется в этом случае лишь игралищем стихий. В этом случае нельзя найти никаких серьезных доводов в подтверждение реального личностного существования.

     

    https://pravoslavie.ru/95624.html

    Finally, I am reassured: I am far more Orthodox that I would have thought. I am perhaps closer to Our Lord than some Church-going people. Why ? Because I know that Tat tvam asi, while their priests made this knowledge a taboo and have inserted themselves between the man and his God as a kind of metaphysical Firewall.

    And yeah, interesting that in Islam, Ibn Al Arabi al Andalusi, one of the greatest Sufi thinkers, who was niknamed the Shaykh al Akbar - the Greatest (spiritual) Leader, but also Ibn Alaflatun - The (spiritual) son/descendant of Plato, has said of God: "Allahuma kulyat el woojood", literally: "The Highest God is the fulness / completeness of Existence". What can be clearer than that ? What can be closer to the Advaita Vedanta that is probably the highest metaphysics of the "Indo-Europeans" (euphemism to avoid the Ar. word) ?

    Now, about Vologda:

    Древнеиндийские тексты повествуют, что на прародине, где много лесов и озер, находятся священные горы, которые делят землю на север и юг, а реки - на текущие к северу и текущие к югу. Река, текущая в южное море, называется Ра (это Волга). А та, что впадает в молочное или Белое море - это Двина (что на санскрите означает "двойная"). У Северной Двины и в самом деле нет своего истока - она возникает от слияния двух рек: Юга и Сухоны. А священные горы из древнеиндийского эпоса очень похожи по описанию на главный водораздел восточной Европы - Северные Увалы, эту гигантскую дугу из возвышенностей, пролегшую от Валдая на северо-восток до полярного Урала.

    Судя по исследованиям палеоклиматологов, в те времена, о которых повествуют "Веды", средне зимняя температура на побережье Ледовитого океана была на 12 градусов выше, чем сейчас. И жилось там в смысле климата не хуже, чем нынче в приатлантических зонах западной Европы. "Подавляющее большинство названий наших рек можно без коверканья языка просто переводить с санскрита, - рассказывает Светлана Жарникова. - Сухона означает "легко преодолимая", Кубена - "извилистая", Суда - "ручей", Дарида - "дающая воду", Падма - "лотос, кувшинка", Куша - "осока", Сямжена - "объединяющая людей". В Вологодской и Архангельской областях множество речек, озер и ручейков называются Ганг, Шива, Индига, Индосат, Синдошка, Индоманка. В моей книге тридцать страниц заняты этими названиями на санскрите. А сохраниться такие названия могут только в том случае - и это уже закон - если сохраняется народ, который дал эти названия. А если он исчезает, то и названия меняются".
     
    https://vk.com/@v_e_d_i-pochemu-vologodskii-govor-ne-nuzhdaetsya-v-perevode-na-sansk

    That is why it is not surprising in the slightest that Vologda people have kept until the 1930ies embroidering Swastikas on their traditional dress, and carving it on their homes. Until some GPU/NKVD (Semitic?) officials decided that it is "Fascist" and should be punished by sending those peasants who just clung to their thousands' years old traditions to the Death Camps. These peasants who again, not surprisingly were mostly Old Believers. When the GPU/NKVD scum finished their "scorching earth" policy there, for hundreds of kilometers villages stood empty in the Great Russian North.

    Immense wooden houses, so well suited for living in the boreal area. Built to last centuries on a land where free peasants who have never been enserfed, as the majority of those of the North have never been enslaved by the Romanov Czars and their henchmen, would live with their families. I have been in these forests, on the shores of these lakes until Onego and the White Sea and seen these old houses standing empty, their owners gone forever because an alien and toxic spirit has entered our land.

    From the Pavel Pryannikov's Telegram channel (Pryannikov's mom was a Jewish Moscovite, while his dad had a Northern Russian Old Believer ancestry)

    Читаю воспоминания Игоря Голомштока – известного советского диссидента. Уже писал кратко о нём. Он вырос в семье, где отчим и мать были «топ-менеджерами» НКВД – ГУЛАГа на Колыме. Вернулись они с Колымы в Москву в 1946 году. Голомшток окончил сразу два вуза – Финансовый институт и по искусствоведению.
    Голомшток оставил записи о жизни того самого номенклатурного либерал-чекизма, как раз формировавшегося в 1950-е, когда дети сталинских силовиков выбирали уже либерализм, а не дыбу.

    В 1951 году Голомшток стал инспектором банков в Москве. Его запись о своей работе:
    «В сферу моих обязанностей входило кредитование капитального строительства районных организаций — бань, прачечных, треста озеленения, треста очистки и пр. Говорят, что, в отличие от теперешнего российского беспредела, при Сталине был порядок. Какое там! Я должен был посещать подведомственные мне учреждения и проверять на месте использование средств, отпущенных на строительство. Чего только я там не насмотрелся! Деньги отпущены на сооружение оранжерей. Где оранжереи? «А мы, — говорят мне, — их сожгли». По платёжным ведомостям обнаруживалось, что зарплата продолжала поступать лицам, сидящим в тюрьме. Я понял, что кого-то придётся сажать и что, скорее всего, посаженным буду я. Надо было сматывать удочки, хотя ещё не истекли два обязательных года работы, положенные молодому специалисту после окончания института».

    В итоге Голомшток ведущим искусствоведом в Пушкинском музее. Он знакомится с московской богемой. В числе его друзей Майя Розанова (потом она станет Марией) и её муж писатель Синявский. Кстати, отчим Розановой был большой начальник в Политуправлении Пограничных войск Левитан. Здесь он описывает, как вместе с семейством Синявских-Розановых они в конце 1950-х добывали иконы и рукописные книги на Русском Севере:

    «Своё первое путешествие по реке Мезени Синявские совершили в 57-м году. На следующий год они пригласили с собой меня. В Москве мы приобрели лодочный мотор, в деревне где-то под Вологдой купили у рыбака старую лодку, и отправились вверх по течению Мезени.
    В верховьях реки на сотни километров виднелись по берегам брошенные деревни. В некоторых таких храмах ещё стояли древние разрозненные иконостасы, а части их и настенные иконы валялись на полу, покрытые толстым слоем птичьего помета. Майя очищала их от грязи и навоза, проводила ваткой со скипидаром по их черным поверхностям, и под ними часто проглядывало письмо XVI-XVII веков.

    В низовьях реки в деревнях еще обитала часть их прежнего населения, но и тут - пустые избы, церкви со сбитыми крестами, разрушенными куполами, сквозь которые дожди и снега, в зависимости от времени года, поливали и засыпали сохранившиеся в них доски с иконописью. Местное население использовало их для хозяйственных нужд. Иконами забивали дыры, на них рубили капусту, ими прикрывали бочки с соленьями (наш друг Коля Кишилов, работавший реставратором в Третьяковской галерее, в одной из деревень увидел окно, забитое иконой лицевой стороной наружу - под её глухой чёрной поверхностью обнаружился «Спас» XIII века).

    Главным интересом Андрея (Синявского) были не столько иконы, сколько книги. Когда-то жившие в этих местах старообрядцы устраивали в подвалах своих домов скрытни, в которых они занимались переписыванием книг. Один из таких скрытней Синявские обнаружили ещё во время их первого путешествия, и теперь они снова пришли сюда, захватив с собой и меня. Это было большое, во всю площадь избы, помещение без окон, с низким потолком, заваленное бумажной продукцией. Рукописные Жития, Апокрифы, старопечатные Библии, Четьи-Минеи, старообрядческие молитвенники — всё это кучами громоздилось на полу как ненужный хлам. Потомки этих книголюбов, ещё жившие в избе, никакого интереса к книгам не проявляли, ценности их не видели и использовали только как бумагу для цигарок. «За пятёрку — сколько унесешь!» Мы грузили эти сокровища в лодку, а потом, уже в крупных населенных пунктах в низовьях Мезени, Синявские по почте отправляли их в Москву к себе на Хлебный переулок».
     
    And they call us Orcs...

    Replies: @LatW

    Аз есмь

    Indeed, this is the very first ontological question. What is being? What am I? “I exist, I am the Being”. “Аз есмь”.

    [MORE]

    Almost reminds me a little of Aristotle’s unmoved mover, the mover of Cosmos that initiates movement on its own, without the influence of any other force. Or Odin, Who sacrifices Himself to Himself to gain the knowledge of the runes.

    In ancient mythical thinking all existence is divine or permeated with the divine (pantheism).

    Finally, I am reassured: I am far more Orthodox that I would have thought. I am perhaps closer to Our Lord than some Church-going people. Why ? Because I know that Tat tvam asi, while their priests made this knowledge a taboo and have inserted themselves between the man and his God as a kind of metaphysical Firewall.

    It’s great that you can keep an open mind. The Old Believers think that the clergy lost God’s blessing. They don’t really have a place for that type of hierarchy. You know, how Jesus used to say “Split a piece of wood and I am there”. Tat tvam asi.

    That is why it is not surprising in the slightest that Vologda people have kept until the 1930ies embroidering Swastikas on their traditional dress

    Thanks for posting that link about the Arctic homeland. It is not entirely unbelievable, as I said, it is the kind of environment that the ancestors liked. We also have place names such as Indra. Needless to say, the Vologda embroidery is very similar to the traditional Latvian one. Almost identical in some cases.

    I personally prefer the more elaborate firecross (with more elaborate branches that spread out almost like a tree, it was on the Vologda embroidery, too).

    Immense wooden houses, so well suited for living in the boreal area. Built to last centuries on a land where free peasants who have never been enserfed, as the majority of those of the North have never been enslaved by the Romanov Czars and their henchmen, would live with their families. I have been in these forests, on the shores of these lakes until Onego and the White Sea and seen these old houses standing empty, their owners gone forever because an alien and toxic spirit has entered our land.

    This is very beautifully written. I really like those houses, the architecture, the detail in them, especially the windows. I absolutely love all the wooden carvings. I think it is easier to be more free in the North. But it’s shocking how far they went to destroy it, I’m always shocked as to how deep the NKVD (and other imperial forces) manage to go.

    Thanks for that blog post. It’s a very eerie scene where they find the iconoclasts. Heartbreaking. Imagine that the Old Believers had already been persecuted once (they were threatened with death), and then to do it to them all over again…

    And they call us Orcs…

    The Orcs are those who did that. It is orc-like to violate anyone’s home.

    Btw, our Old Believers were harassed, too, by the NKVD in 1940-41 (same as one side of my family who actually lived not too far from some of their settlements).

    They are called “Pomortsi”. They have a fantastic iconoclast in Riga (it’s considered a piece of our cultural heritage).

    • Replies: @LatW
    @LatW


    They have a fantastic iconoclast
     
    I meant iconostas, of course. Bashi, I know you like more discreet, smaller (wooden?) churches but this shiny wall is really cool.


    You can see it in this Sunday school video, starts at 0:36

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TIbBdFpD06I&t=140s

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

  746. @Emil Nikola Richard
    Gonzalo Lira's round table 33 is a hoot.

    The topic for discussion: WTF is going on with Euro economy controlled demolition?

    Tom Luongo & Alex Krainer. The people who know what is going on aren't talking. It seems like a Great Reset move with the Euros taking the plunge. The Fed is double crossing those guys with the interest rate jack which will destroy the Euro economy in an uncontrolled demolition.

    Hoo boy.

    Maybe it's a good thing Biden has lost his wits.

    https://i0.wp.com/tomluongo.me/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/UN-vs.-Fed-1.png

    Replies: @A123, @Barbarossa

    Word on the street is that we have 10% mortgage interest rates by new years. I haven’t looked into it so I don’t know if that’s BS or not. If it gets that high it should make things spicy.

    I know that we had a peak of around 18% mortgage rates in the early 80’s but even lower level increases like we are seeing should be much more disruptive since we are much more debt reliant now.

    • Replies: @A123
    @Barbarossa

    Standard rates have reached 7% and are still climbing (1). 8% by year is quite possible, though 10% seems unlikely for 30 Year Fixed.

    Home purchases are driven by affordability. As Interest/mo. goes up, Principal/mo. goes down. So, prices are sliding down.

    There will be fire (again) among the more exotic variable rate loan products where the plan was to flip out of the property before a step up happened. There is no way out for those who cannot pay variable interest and selling will not cover the loan outstanding.

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://www.zerohedge.com/personal-finance/flippers-fked-mortgage-rates-more-double-10-months

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Barbarossa

  747. Kyrie Irving & Hypocrisy

    Re: Two Below Articles

    This first one notes outrage over what Irving did.

    https://www.insidethegames.biz/articles/1129945/kyrie-irving-anti-semitism

    From the same venue, this piece espouses bigotry against Russians with cherry picked historical instances. The comments section includes some walloping follow-up to the tripe of the intellectually challenged author.

    To get to his level, one can highlight the English dominated Britain featuring (among other things) the likes of the murdering Henry VIII, brutal colonial occupations from a country that banned Russians at Wimbledon, while having allowed White South Africans to compete in that tournament during apartheid.

    https://www.insidethegames.biz/articles/1129899/miller-putin-blog

  748. @LatW
    @Bashibuzuk


    Аз есмь
     
    Indeed, this is the very first ontological question. What is being? What am I? "I exist, I am the Being". "Аз есмь".

    Almost reminds me a little of Aristotle's unmoved mover, the mover of Cosmos that initiates movement on its own, without the influence of any other force. Or Odin, Who sacrifices Himself to Himself to gain the knowledge of the runes.

    In ancient mythical thinking all existence is divine or permeated with the divine (pantheism).


    Finally, I am reassured: I am far more Orthodox that I would have thought. I am perhaps closer to Our Lord than some Church-going people. Why ? Because I know that Tat tvam asi, while their priests made this knowledge a taboo and have inserted themselves between the man and his God as a kind of metaphysical Firewall.
     
    It's great that you can keep an open mind. The Old Believers think that the clergy lost God's blessing. They don't really have a place for that type of hierarchy. You know, how Jesus used to say "Split a piece of wood and I am there". Tat tvam asi.

    That is why it is not surprising in the slightest that Vologda people have kept until the 1930ies embroidering Swastikas on their traditional dress
     
    Thanks for posting that link about the Arctic homeland. It is not entirely unbelievable, as I said, it is the kind of environment that the ancestors liked. We also have place names such as Indra. Needless to say, the Vologda embroidery is very similar to the traditional Latvian one. Almost identical in some cases.

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/40/Laimas_krusts_Lielvardes_josta.jpg

    I personally prefer the more elaborate firecross (with more elaborate branches that spread out almost like a tree, it was on the Vologda embroidery, too).

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b5/Swastika_from_Baltic.jpg


    Immense wooden houses, so well suited for living in the boreal area. Built to last centuries on a land where free peasants who have never been enserfed, as the majority of those of the North have never been enslaved by the Romanov Czars and their henchmen, would live with their families. I have been in these forests, on the shores of these lakes until Onego and the White Sea and seen these old houses standing empty, their owners gone forever because an alien and toxic spirit has entered our land.

     

    This is very beautifully written. I really like those houses, the architecture, the detail in them, especially the windows. I absolutely love all the wooden carvings. I think it is easier to be more free in the North. But it's shocking how far they went to destroy it, I'm always shocked as to how deep the NKVD (and other imperial forces) manage to go.

    Thanks for that blog post. It's a very eerie scene where they find the iconoclasts. Heartbreaking. Imagine that the Old Believers had already been persecuted once (they were threatened with death), and then to do it to them all over again...


    And they call us Orcs…
     
    The Orcs are those who did that. It is orc-like to violate anyone's home.

    Btw, our Old Believers were harassed, too, by the NKVD in 1940-41 (same as one side of my family who actually lived not too far from some of their settlements).

    They are called "Pomortsi". They have a fantastic iconoclast in Riga (it's considered a piece of our cultural heritage).

    Replies: @LatW

    They have a fantastic iconoclast

    I meant iconostas, of course. Bashi, I know you like more discreet, smaller (wooden?) churches but this shiny wall is really cool.

    [MORE]

    You can see it in this Sunday school video, starts at 0:36

    • Thanks: Bashibuzuk
    • Replies: @Bashibuzuk
    @LatW

    I like the old wooden churches most because they are probably the closest to our ancestors Old Faith temples in the pre-Christian times.



    It is interesting to compare old North European wooden churches to the wooden Hindu temples in Northern India.

    https://img.traveltriangle.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Temples-In-Manali_28th-jan.jpg

    https://img.traveltriangle.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Jamula-Temple_28th-jan-400x229.jpg

    https://img.traveltriangle.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Vashisht-Temple-Manali-2-400x229.jpg

    We can easily imagine how a similar building erected on a larger scale painted red and decorated with elaborate carvings stood in Arkona as described by the Crusaders.

    http://www.findmessages.com/wood-carving-south-eastern-pillar-at-hidimba-devi-temple-manali-himachal-pradesh-india

    https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTjBk0cfptg3yktnWimwWcqD4lmIC4WA6wGhw&usqp=CAU

    https://c8.alamy.com/comp/A01RKW/india-himachal-pradesh-manali-vashisht-hindu-temple-woodcarving-detail-A01RKW.jpg

    Replies: @Barbarossa, @LatW

  749. @sudden death
    @A123


    Russia wanted to save Mariupol as a functioning city. The advance was slow to carefully target neo-Nazi positions, thus minimizing collateral damage. They largely succeeded, with the obvious exception of the industrial area around the Azov Steelworks.
     
    Now let's take an actual quick lookaround how the "functioning" city with "minimal collateral damage" (according to various Kremlin shills) really fared NOT in industrial areas, but in other city parts quite far from Azovstal:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h9HgZv4lk_o

    Replies: @A123, @Mr. Hack

    There is a huge difference between “minimal” and “zero” that you do not grasp. I am sorry that you are overly emotional.

    If kremlinstoogeA123 feels that the collateral damage in the areas exposed in the clip that you’ve included are “minimal”, then it’s obvious that the guy is 100% flakey and doesn’t deserve a place at the table. The guy is a complete kook, IMHO. Once again folks, watch this video and decided for yourselfs and tell me whether it looks like “minimal” damage or something much more sinister and complete?…

  750. sher singh says:
    @Seraphim
    @sher singh

    You may notice that Russians take Christianity seriously and they started to clean the 'gay' shit. Ans they carry arms. Big ones that will make you weep.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk, @sher singh

    Russian women have the right to marry and divorce.
    I’m using an old definition of gay as generally effeminate.

    The majority of Russians have no problem with inter-racial marriage,
    They certainly won’t kill over it|| Christianity is leftism, support it honestly or GTFO.

    Russians do not carry weapons, and Christianity discourages violence.
    Stop substituting the state army for individual initiative.
    The very concept of Christian rule of law refutes your argument.
    You were better off under the Turks.

    https://www.academia.edu/1549528/2_The_Christian_origins_of_secularism_and_the_rule_of_law

  751. sher singh says:

    jesus cried on the cross – Gurus said Tera Bhaana Meetha Laggey (Your will is sweet)

    A Christian woman is the most likely to produce bastards – historically too.

    There’s just not really much to argue, there’s a reason the West is mostly atheist/liberal.
    It only found success breaking from the Church, people will counter-argue. Idc,

    ਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕਾਖਾਲਸਾਵਾਹਿਗੁਰੂਜੀਕੀਫਤਿਹ

  752. Bashibuzuk says:
    @LatW
    @LatW


    They have a fantastic iconoclast
     
    I meant iconostas, of course. Bashi, I know you like more discreet, smaller (wooden?) churches but this shiny wall is really cool.


    You can see it in this Sunday school video, starts at 0:36

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TIbBdFpD06I&t=140s

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

    I like the old wooden churches most because they are probably the closest to our ancestors Old Faith temples in the pre-Christian times.

    [MORE]

    It is interesting to compare old North European wooden churches to the wooden Hindu temples in Northern India.

    We can easily imagine how a similar building erected on a larger scale painted red and decorated with elaborate carvings stood in Arkona as described by the Crusaders.

    http://www.findmessages.com/wood-carving-south-eastern-pillar-at-hidimba-devi-temple-manali-himachal-pradesh-india

    https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTjBk0cfptg3yktnWimwWcqD4lmIC4WA6wGhw&usqp=CAU

    • Replies: @Barbarossa
    @Bashibuzuk

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urnes_Stave_Church

    The Norse stave churches are a particularly fascinating form of timber construction, very separate from main European techniques. They are very ancient as well with extant examples approaching 1000 years old.

    Interestingly, those churches have some of the only systematized techniques for full mortise and tenon timber framing valley and hip rafter systems in European traditions. The French had a fairly consistent approach too, but most other compound roof joinery in Europe was ad-hoc and relatively crude.

    They knew what they were doing up there!

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk, @Mikel

    , @LatW
    @Bashibuzuk


    We can easily imagine how a similar building erected on a larger scale painted red and decorated with elaborate carvings stood in Arkona as described by the Crusaders.
     
    From what I've heard in certain tales, is that the Arkona temple may have been located on a rock on the coast. But maybe those are just myths to make it appear more majestic.


    Here is a cute church that was relatively recently built in the late 19th century (in fact, I recently posted a clip with a much larger, more flashy looking church that was just built (The Church of Our Lady of Kazan' in Latvia), but the original one was this smaller, wooden church, I wish they had rebuilt it exactly the way it was, especially since wood has been making a comeback lately, but, of course, they had to build a more imposing one, unfortunately, the Commies demolished the original one). The photo is from 1910.

    http://www.kazanskijhram.lv/uploads/Edinburga.jpg

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

  753. @Barbarossa
    @Emil Nikola Richard

    Word on the street is that we have 10% mortgage interest rates by new years. I haven't looked into it so I don't know if that's BS or not. If it gets that high it should make things spicy.

    I know that we had a peak of around 18% mortgage rates in the early 80's but even lower level increases like we are seeing should be much more disruptive since we are much more debt reliant now.

    Replies: @A123

    Standard rates have reached 7% and are still climbing (1). 8% by year is quite possible, though 10% seems unlikely for 30 Year Fixed.

    Home purchases are driven by affordability. As Interest/mo. goes up, Principal/mo. goes down. So, prices are sliding down.

    There will be fire (again) among the more exotic variable rate loan products where the plan was to flip out of the property before a step up happened. There is no way out for those who cannot pay variable interest and selling will not cover the loan outstanding.

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://www.zerohedge.com/personal-finance/flippers-fked-mortgage-rates-more-double-10-months

    • Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
    @A123

    The system is inherently unstable when 90% of the buyers are only interested in the size of the payment and do not even understand they are gambling their solvency on their adjustable rate mortgage payment not ballooning.

    The first time I heard the term balloon payment I did not believe it was actually a thing. I was so naive.

    When I read my lease before I signed it my landlord was gobsmacked that I would do that. I know lawyers who have signed mortgage (death pledge) documents without reading them. My god did not your parents tell you 500 times when you were a kid to never sign anything unless you first read it carefully?

    Replies: @Barbarossa, @A123

    , @Barbarossa
    @A123

    Prices need to come down as they have gotten unsustainable, but a lot of people are going to be way underwater when that does happen.


    There is no way out for those who cannot pay variable interest and selling will not cover the loan outstanding.
     
    That's exactly what I've been seeing coming down the pike too, though if home values recede it's going to affect more than flippers. The cost of new builds is just going wild right now between labor shortages, material costs and financing. Usually I have a pretty good "sense" of what things will cost but it's right out the window now as it's changing so quickly.

    It's going to be wild times in housing for the next little bit!
  754. @Bashibuzuk
    @LatW

    I like the old wooden churches most because they are probably the closest to our ancestors Old Faith temples in the pre-Christian times.



    It is interesting to compare old North European wooden churches to the wooden Hindu temples in Northern India.

    https://img.traveltriangle.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Temples-In-Manali_28th-jan.jpg

    https://img.traveltriangle.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Jamula-Temple_28th-jan-400x229.jpg

    https://img.traveltriangle.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Vashisht-Temple-Manali-2-400x229.jpg

    We can easily imagine how a similar building erected on a larger scale painted red and decorated with elaborate carvings stood in Arkona as described by the Crusaders.

    http://www.findmessages.com/wood-carving-south-eastern-pillar-at-hidimba-devi-temple-manali-himachal-pradesh-india

    https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTjBk0cfptg3yktnWimwWcqD4lmIC4WA6wGhw&usqp=CAU

    https://c8.alamy.com/comp/A01RKW/india-himachal-pradesh-manali-vashisht-hindu-temple-woodcarving-detail-A01RKW.jpg

    Replies: @Barbarossa, @LatW

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urnes_Stave_Church

    The Norse stave churches are a particularly fascinating form of timber construction, very separate from main European techniques. They are very ancient as well with extant examples approaching 1000 years old.

    Interestingly, those churches have some of the only systematized techniques for full mortise and tenon timber framing valley and hip rafter systems in European traditions. The French had a fairly consistent approach too, but most other compound roof joinery in Europe was ad-hoc and relatively crude.

    They knew what they were doing up there!

    • Replies: @Bashibuzuk
    @Barbarossa

    Yes. And these churches look somewhat similar to the small wooden Hindu temple I have posted above.

    In the same area, on the Russian side, a later but nevertheless magnificent example of wooden architecture is found in the Pogost of Kozhi.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kizhi_Pogost

    The oldest wooden church in Russia is dated to the fifteenth century.

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/56/Church_of_the_Deposition_from_the_Borodav%D0%B0_2009.jpg/1280px-Church_of_the_Deposition_from_the_Borodav%D0%B0_2009.jpg

    Northern Russians (and their Finno-Ugric neighbors) were great carpenters. So were most probably Wends. The WendishArkona pagan temple on the island of Rugen has been described by the Crusaders as a quite impressive wooden structure.

    The Balto-Slav wooden architecture techniques probably go back to the Lusatian Culture.

    https://medievalheritage.eu/en/main-page/heritage/poland/biskupin-open-air-museum/

    https://indo-european.eu/2019/08/the-lusatian-culture-the-most-likely-vector-of-balto-slavic-expansions/

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    , @Mikel
    @Barbarossa


    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urnes_Stave_Church
     
    Thanks for that link!

    Apparently, a good part of the wood has been replaced over the centuries but there are still plenty of structural elements standing since medieval times. Perhaps what makes it even more amazing is that this church is located in a very humid part of Scandinavia, next to a fjord and not far from the ocean.

    I wonder what kind of wood they used. In the Basque Country you find centuries old oak beams and posts in old buildings but I don't think there's much hardwood available in the Norwegian fjord area.

    Replies: @Barbarossa, @Philip Owen

  755. @A123
    @Barbarossa

    Standard rates have reached 7% and are still climbing (1). 8% by year is quite possible, though 10% seems unlikely for 30 Year Fixed.

    Home purchases are driven by affordability. As Interest/mo. goes up, Principal/mo. goes down. So, prices are sliding down.

    There will be fire (again) among the more exotic variable rate loan products where the plan was to flip out of the property before a step up happened. There is no way out for those who cannot pay variable interest and selling will not cover the loan outstanding.

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://www.zerohedge.com/personal-finance/flippers-fked-mortgage-rates-more-double-10-months

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Barbarossa

    The system is inherently unstable when 90% of the buyers are only interested in the size of the payment and do not even understand they are gambling their solvency on their adjustable rate mortgage payment not ballooning.

    The first time I heard the term balloon payment I did not believe it was actually a thing. I was so naive.

    When I read my lease before I signed it my landlord was gobsmacked that I would do that. I know lawyers who have signed mortgage (death pledge) documents without reading them. My god did not your parents tell you 500 times when you were a kid to never sign anything unless you first read it carefully?

    • Agree: Barbarossa
    • Replies: @Barbarossa
    @Emil Nikola Richard


    My god did not your parents tell you 500 times when you were a kid to never sign anything unless you first read it carefully?
     
    The answer to that seems to be emphatically "NO".

    Financial literacy is so bad that it's no surprise that record numbers of people are living paycheck to paycheck.

    Recently I've been having a frustrating time tying to convince one of the guys who works for me to be smarter. He gets his furniture from a "Rent to Own" place plus keeps full collision on his $1,500 value vehicle that he bought from a low credit/ no credit place that charges like a 28% interest rate.

    He just doesn't seem to understand that he's getting hosed and just cares about making the payments, even though he's always scrambling.

    He's not really a dumb guy but he has less financial literacy than my 10 year old.
    , @A123
    @Emil Nikola Richard


    When I read my lease before I signed it my landlord was gobsmacked that I would do that.
     
    The big leasing firms prepared the state standard contract, and provide it 100% free to everyone else. I know someone with 4 properties and minimal overhead for his lawyer. He uses the standard template & will not change it... "sign it or go away". He cannot afford to do anything else.

    I do not know that every rental within 100 miles is the same, but 95%+ would be a safe bet. Negotiating a rental lease is more or less impossible. The young can either sign or live in their car.

    PEACE 😇
  756. A few days ago there were warnings from Saudi Arabia that an attack upon it and US forces in Iraq by Iran was ‘imminent’. Now Germany is advising it’s citizens, particularly the dual national (German-Iranian!) ones, to leave Iran, as they are subject to ‘arbitrary arrest’ there

    Berlin urges German nationals to leave Iran or risk arrest

    BERLIN, Nov 3 (Reuters) – Germany’s government on Thursday urged its citizens to leave Iran or risk arbitrary arrest and long prison terms there, warning that dual nationals were particularly at risk.

    Berlin has welcomed European Union sanctions on Iran, which has unleashed a bloody crackdown on some of the biggest protests in the Islamic Republic since the 1979 revolution.

    “German nationals are asked to leave Iran,” a foreign ministry statement said.

    https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/berlin-urges-german-nationals-leave-iran-or-risk-arrest-2022-11-03/

  757. @A123
    @Barbarossa

    Standard rates have reached 7% and are still climbing (1). 8% by year is quite possible, though 10% seems unlikely for 30 Year Fixed.

    Home purchases are driven by affordability. As Interest/mo. goes up, Principal/mo. goes down. So, prices are sliding down.

    There will be fire (again) among the more exotic variable rate loan products where the plan was to flip out of the property before a step up happened. There is no way out for those who cannot pay variable interest and selling will not cover the loan outstanding.

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://www.zerohedge.com/personal-finance/flippers-fked-mortgage-rates-more-double-10-months

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Barbarossa

    Prices need to come down as they have gotten unsustainable, but a lot of people are going to be way underwater when that does happen.

    There is no way out for those who cannot pay variable interest and selling will not cover the loan outstanding.

    That’s exactly what I’ve been seeing coming down the pike too, though if home values recede it’s going to affect more than flippers. The cost of new builds is just going wild right now between labor shortages, material costs and financing. Usually I have a pretty good “sense” of what things will cost but it’s right out the window now as it’s changing so quickly.

    It’s going to be wild times in housing for the next little bit!

  758. Clare Daly
    @ClareDalyMEP
    ·
    19h
    “Almost 1/2 [of Ukrainians surveyed] agreed it was imperative to seek a ceasefire to stop Russians killing Ukraine’s young men. Slightly more supported negotiations with Russia on a complete ceasefire, with 1/4 totally against & 1/5… neutral.”

    [MORE]

  759. @Emil Nikola Richard
    @A123

    The system is inherently unstable when 90% of the buyers are only interested in the size of the payment and do not even understand they are gambling their solvency on their adjustable rate mortgage payment not ballooning.

    The first time I heard the term balloon payment I did not believe it was actually a thing. I was so naive.

    When I read my lease before I signed it my landlord was gobsmacked that I would do that. I know lawyers who have signed mortgage (death pledge) documents without reading them. My god did not your parents tell you 500 times when you were a kid to never sign anything unless you first read it carefully?

    Replies: @Barbarossa, @A123

    My god did not your parents tell you 500 times when you were a kid to never sign anything unless you first read it carefully?

    The answer to that seems to be emphatically “NO”.

    Financial literacy is so bad that it’s no surprise that record numbers of people are living paycheck to paycheck.

    Recently I’ve been having a frustrating time tying to convince one of the guys who works for me to be smarter. He gets his furniture from a “Rent to Own” place plus keeps full collision on his $1,500 value vehicle that he bought from a low credit/ no credit place that charges like a 28% interest rate.

    He just doesn’t seem to understand that he’s getting hosed and just cares about making the payments, even though he’s always scrambling.

    He’s not really a dumb guy but he has less financial literacy than my 10 year old.

  760. @Emil Nikola Richard
    @A123

    The system is inherently unstable when 90% of the buyers are only interested in the size of the payment and do not even understand they are gambling their solvency on their adjustable rate mortgage payment not ballooning.

    The first time I heard the term balloon payment I did not believe it was actually a thing. I was so naive.

    When I read my lease before I signed it my landlord was gobsmacked that I would do that. I know lawyers who have signed mortgage (death pledge) documents without reading them. My god did not your parents tell you 500 times when you were a kid to never sign anything unless you first read it carefully?

    Replies: @Barbarossa, @A123

    When I read my lease before I signed it my landlord was gobsmacked that I would do that.

    The big leasing firms prepared the state standard contract, and provide it 100% free to everyone else. I know someone with 4 properties and minimal overhead for his lawyer. He uses the standard template & will not change it… “sign it or go away”. He cannot afford to do anything else.

    I do not know that every rental within 100 miles is the same, but 95%+ would be a safe bet. Negotiating a rental lease is more or less impossible. The young can either sign or live in their car.

    PEACE 😇

  761. @A123
    @sudden death



    As long as Ukie terrorists continue truck bombings, things will remain unstable.
     
    How does “tyranny” still have influence over Mariupols residents lives if Putin won
     
    Are you seriously asking how Pali/Ukie suicide truck bombers can be a threat even though their side has lost?

    Really?

    How can that not be self evident?

    PEACE 😇

     
    https://i.pinimg.com/originals/1d/ce/be/1dcebe7d228212ff4ff444746274383a.jpg

    Replies: @sudden death, @Mr. Hack

    What really “hurts” are the stupid comments that you keep on making here, where Mariupol is a symbol of Russian benign victory and Ukraine has lost. The only real loser is your your fellow traveler and Putin sympathizer, Blake Masters. If he weren’t such a putin sympathizer like you are, I might even vote for him. Former Vice President Pence got it completely correct when he recently stated:

    “There can be no room in the conservative movement for apologists for Putin,” Pence said. “There is only room in this movement for champions of freedom.”

    He had slugs like you, Blake Masters and Tucker Carlson in mind when he made this statement.

    • Replies: @Matra
    @Mr. Hack


    If he weren’t such a putin sympathizer like you are, I might even vote for him
     
    Like I said before you are loyal to a foreign country, one in which you probably have only visited, if even that. People like you have ruined the US yet you have no shame about it.

    “In the first place we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the man’s becoming in very fact an American, and nothing but an American…There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn’t an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag, and this excludes the red flag, which symbolizes all wars against liberty and civilization, just as much as it excludes any foreign flag of a nation to which we are hostile…We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language…and we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people.”

    Theodore Roosevelt 1907
     

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @A123

  762. Bashibuzuk says:
    @Barbarossa
    @Bashibuzuk

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urnes_Stave_Church

    The Norse stave churches are a particularly fascinating form of timber construction, very separate from main European techniques. They are very ancient as well with extant examples approaching 1000 years old.

    Interestingly, those churches have some of the only systematized techniques for full mortise and tenon timber framing valley and hip rafter systems in European traditions. The French had a fairly consistent approach too, but most other compound roof joinery in Europe was ad-hoc and relatively crude.

    They knew what they were doing up there!

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk, @Mikel

    Yes. And these churches look somewhat similar to the small wooden Hindu temple I have posted above.

    In the same area, on the Russian side, a later but nevertheless magnificent example of wooden architecture is found in the Pogost of Kozhi.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kizhi_Pogost

    The oldest wooden church in Russia is dated to the fifteenth century.

    Northern Russians (and their Finno-Ugric neighbors) were great carpenters. So were most probably Wends. The WendishArkona pagan temple on the island of Rugen has been described by the Crusaders as a quite impressive wooden structure.

    The Balto-Slav wooden architecture techniques probably go back to the Lusatian Culture.

    https://medievalheritage.eu/en/main-page/heritage/poland/biskupin-open-air-museum/

    https://indo-european.eu/2019/08/the-lusatian-culture-the-most-likely-vector-of-balto-slavic-expansions/

    • Thanks: Barbarossa
    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @Bashibuzuk

    https://castles.com.ua/fileadmin/_processed_/csm_nareshti-sonce_888802ecb7.jpg


    https://castles.com.ua/fileadmin/_processed_/csm_dilowee_213e643eee.png
    Church in Dilove (the center of Europe), year and exact name?

    Although Zakarpattya includes a treasure trove of wooden Christian churches, all regions of Ukraine include them as well. You can view hundreds of such wooden churches (and castles and other curiosities) at this very well put together blogsite:

    https://castles.com.ua/wooden.html

    A blogsite well worth the visit!

  763. @Mr. Hack
    @A123

    What really "hurts" are the stupid comments that you keep on making here, where Mariupol is a symbol of Russian benign victory and Ukraine has lost. The only real loser is your your fellow traveler and Putin sympathizer, Blake Masters. If he weren't such a putin sympathizer like you are, I might even vote for him. Former Vice President Pence got it completely correct when he recently stated:

    “There can be no room in the conservative movement for apologists for Putin,” Pence said. “There is only room in this movement for champions of freedom.”


    He had slugs like you, Blake Masters and Tucker Carlson in mind when he made this statement.

    https://www.gannett-cdn.com/presto/2022/03/20/PPYD/77cb569a-a2bf-4db8-ab53-2ea291897e28-261185.jpg

    Replies: @Matra

    If he weren’t such a putin sympathizer like you are, I might even vote for him

    Like I said before you are loyal to a foreign country, one in which you probably have only visited, if even that. People like you have ruined the US yet you have no shame about it.

    “In the first place we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the man’s becoming in very fact an American, and nothing but an American…There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn’t an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag, and this excludes the red flag, which symbolizes all wars against liberty and civilization, just as much as it excludes any foreign flag of a nation to which we are hostile…We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language…and we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people.”

    Theodore Roosevelt 1907

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @Matra

    It's not m fault that the land of my birth, the US, has consistently lined up against Russia, during the cold war and even today. The fact that the US supports Ukraine today and that this dovetails nicely with my own views makes me even prouder to be an American. Does supporting Russia, another foreign country, like kremlinstoogeA123 choses to do, make him any more of an American patriot than me?

    https://www.politico.eu/cdn-cgi/image/width=1024,quality=80,onerror=redirect,format=auto/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/russia-vladimir-putin-cartoon.jpg

    Apologists for Putin, like kremlinstoogeA123, trying to make "Russia great again"?

    Is former Vice President Pence also "loyal to a foreign country" because he supports Ukraine's bid to rid itself of a maniacal aggressor?

    , @A123
    @Matra


    @Mr. Hack

    Like I said before you are loyal to a foreign country, one in which you probably have only visited, if even that. People like you have ruined the US yet you have no shame about it.
     
    The idea that the U.S. must be bled dry for Ukie-stan is absurd. This is not WW II. Putin reclaiming the most Russian part of The Ukraine region is not a threat to America.

    If you go back to the beginning of the discussion, I was actually relatively neutral on the matter. The histrionic and unrealistic Ukie Maximalists here have pushed me towards a pro-Russia stance. Not because Putin is great. It is because Zelensky so loathsome.

    I now understand & accept that there was little Putin could do. The European WEF created and continues to drives Kiev aggression. When one has a violent neighbor, there is a duty to rescue the defenseless from such evil. That is how so many anti-Communist Cubans wound up in Florida.

    What Ukraine needs most is a leader who will negotiate in good faith.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @Emil Nikola Richard

  764. @Matra
    @Mr. Hack


    If he weren’t such a putin sympathizer like you are, I might even vote for him
     
    Like I said before you are loyal to a foreign country, one in which you probably have only visited, if even that. People like you have ruined the US yet you have no shame about it.

    “In the first place we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the man’s becoming in very fact an American, and nothing but an American…There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn’t an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag, and this excludes the red flag, which symbolizes all wars against liberty and civilization, just as much as it excludes any foreign flag of a nation to which we are hostile…We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language…and we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people.”

    Theodore Roosevelt 1907
     

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @A123

    It’s not m fault that the land of my birth, the US, has consistently lined up against Russia, during the cold war and even today. The fact that the US supports Ukraine today and that this dovetails nicely with my own views makes me even prouder to be an American. Does supporting Russia, another foreign country, like kremlinstoogeA123 choses to do, make him any more of an American patriot than me?

    Apologists for Putin, like kremlinstoogeA123, trying to make “Russia great again”?

    Is former Vice President Pence also “loyal to a foreign country” because he supports Ukraine’s bid to rid itself of a maniacal aggressor?

  765. @Matra
    @Mr. Hack


    If he weren’t such a putin sympathizer like you are, I might even vote for him
     
    Like I said before you are loyal to a foreign country, one in which you probably have only visited, if even that. People like you have ruined the US yet you have no shame about it.

    “In the first place we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the man’s becoming in very fact an American, and nothing but an American…There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn’t an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag, and this excludes the red flag, which symbolizes all wars against liberty and civilization, just as much as it excludes any foreign flag of a nation to which we are hostile…We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language…and we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people.”

    Theodore Roosevelt 1907
     

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @A123

    Like I said before you are loyal to a foreign country, one in which you probably have only visited, if even that. People like you have ruined the US yet you have no shame about it.

    The idea that the U.S. must be bled dry for Ukie-stan is absurd. This is not WW II. Putin reclaiming the most Russian part of The Ukraine region is not a threat to America.

    If you go back to the beginning of the discussion, I was actually relatively neutral on the matter. The histrionic and unrealistic Ukie Maximalists here have pushed me towards a pro-Russia stance. Not because Putin is great. It is because Zelensky so loathsome.

    I now understand & accept that there was little Putin could do. The European WEF created and continues to drives Kiev aggression. When one has a violent neighbor, there is a duty to rescue the defenseless from such evil. That is how so many anti-Communist Cubans wound up in Florida.

    What Ukraine needs most is a leader who will negotiate in good faith.

    PEACE 😇

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @A123


    The idea that the U.S. must be bled dry for Ukie-stan is absurd.
     
    Another one of your lies, kremlinstoogeA123. America is not being bled dry, the economy is humming along, and want ads and help wanted signs are everywhere.

    Putin reclaiming the most Russian part of The Ukraine region is not a threat to America.
     
    Typical Apologists for Putin sort of junk. Don't you have anything better to offer than this?

    I now understand & accept that there was little Putin could do.
     
    You're understanding of things is very shallow. Poor, poor Putler, he was forced into a corner and needs to keep on bombing civilians and their homes and cities. His military, after all, is second rate and can't directly take on the Ukrainian military.

    The European WEF created and continues to drives Kiev aggression.
     
    There is no "Kyiv agression" you knucklehead. Ukraine was from the start and continues to this day to be on the defensive. It was Russia that invaded Ukraine, not the other way around. I don't understand how somebody with a supposedly self purported high IQ is incapable of understanding anything as simple as this?

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    , @Emil Nikola Richard
    @A123


    This is not WW II.
     
    WWII was a total bankers' scam A to Z.

    How it works: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/726546.Tragedy_and_Hope

    That is > 1000 pp. Most of it is duller than Captain Kangaroo. If you are persistent all the relevant facts are in there. (except one!)
  766. @Bashibuzuk
    @Barbarossa

    Yes. And these churches look somewhat similar to the small wooden Hindu temple I have posted above.

    In the same area, on the Russian side, a later but nevertheless magnificent example of wooden architecture is found in the Pogost of Kozhi.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kizhi_Pogost

    The oldest wooden church in Russia is dated to the fifteenth century.

    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/56/Church_of_the_Deposition_from_the_Borodav%D0%B0_2009.jpg/1280px-Church_of_the_Deposition_from_the_Borodav%D0%B0_2009.jpg

    Northern Russians (and their Finno-Ugric neighbors) were great carpenters. So were most probably Wends. The WendishArkona pagan temple on the island of Rugen has been described by the Crusaders as a quite impressive wooden structure.

    The Balto-Slav wooden architecture techniques probably go back to the Lusatian Culture.

    https://medievalheritage.eu/en/main-page/heritage/poland/biskupin-open-air-museum/

    https://indo-european.eu/2019/08/the-lusatian-culture-the-most-likely-vector-of-balto-slavic-expansions/

    Replies: @Mr. Hack


    Church in Dilove (the center of Europe), year and exact name?

    Although Zakarpattya includes a treasure trove of wooden Christian churches, all regions of Ukraine include them as well. You can view hundreds of such wooden churches (and castles and other curiosities) at this very well put together blogsite:

    https://castles.com.ua/wooden.html

    A blogsite well worth the visit!

    • Thanks: Bashibuzuk
  767. @Barbarossa
    @Bashibuzuk

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urnes_Stave_Church

    The Norse stave churches are a particularly fascinating form of timber construction, very separate from main European techniques. They are very ancient as well with extant examples approaching 1000 years old.

    Interestingly, those churches have some of the only systematized techniques for full mortise and tenon timber framing valley and hip rafter systems in European traditions. The French had a fairly consistent approach too, but most other compound roof joinery in Europe was ad-hoc and relatively crude.

    They knew what they were doing up there!

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk, @Mikel

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urnes_Stave_Church

    Thanks for that link!

    Apparently, a good part of the wood has been replaced over the centuries but there are still plenty of structural elements standing since medieval times. Perhaps what makes it even more amazing is that this church is located in a very humid part of Scandinavia, next to a fjord and not far from the ocean.

    I wonder what kind of wood they used. In the Basque Country you find centuries old oak beams and posts in old buildings but I don’t think there’s much hardwood available in the Norwegian fjord area.

    • Replies: @Barbarossa
    @Mikel

    It's mostly all Pine and Spruce up there. I don't believe that any hardwood would have been used except perhaps for small structural things like pegs.

    Old growth pine can be really durable and rot resistant; quite unlike most second growth pine you see today which is very fast growing and mostly sapwood. I'm sure the carving would have been pine since spruce would be an absolute misery to carve. Tight grained pine is very nice though.


    a good part of the wood has been replaced over the centuries
     
    This made me think of the human body; how our cells are replaced while we remain constant. It's rather a nice thought that a building would be repaired over centuries rather than just razed and "updated" at the first sign of decay.

    Replies: @Mikel

    , @Philip Owen
    @Mikel

    That said, there are oaks in Southern Norway.

    Replies: @Barbarossa

  768. @A123
    @Matra


    @Mr. Hack

    Like I said before you are loyal to a foreign country, one in which you probably have only visited, if even that. People like you have ruined the US yet you have no shame about it.
     
    The idea that the U.S. must be bled dry for Ukie-stan is absurd. This is not WW II. Putin reclaiming the most Russian part of The Ukraine region is not a threat to America.

    If you go back to the beginning of the discussion, I was actually relatively neutral on the matter. The histrionic and unrealistic Ukie Maximalists here have pushed me towards a pro-Russia stance. Not because Putin is great. It is because Zelensky so loathsome.

    I now understand & accept that there was little Putin could do. The European WEF created and continues to drives Kiev aggression. When one has a violent neighbor, there is a duty to rescue the defenseless from such evil. That is how so many anti-Communist Cubans wound up in Florida.

    What Ukraine needs most is a leader who will negotiate in good faith.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @Emil Nikola Richard

    The idea that the U.S. must be bled dry for Ukie-stan is absurd.

    Another one of your lies, kremlinstoogeA123. America is not being bled dry, the economy is humming along, and want ads and help wanted signs are everywhere.

    Putin reclaiming the most Russian part of The Ukraine region is not a threat to America.

    Typical Apologists for Putin sort of junk. Don’t you have anything better to offer than this?

    I now understand & accept that there was little Putin could do.

    You’re understanding of things is very shallow. Poor, poor Putler, he was forced into a corner and needs to keep on bombing civilians and their homes and cities. His military, after all, is second rate and can’t directly take on the Ukrainian military.

    The European WEF created and continues to drives Kiev aggression.

    There is no “Kyiv agression” you knucklehead. Ukraine was from the start and continues to this day to be on the defensive. It was Russia that invaded Ukraine, not the other way around. I don’t understand how somebody with a supposedly self purported high IQ is incapable of understanding anything as simple as this?

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    @Mr. Hack

    Ukraine is acting like an annoying Palatinate Baron perched on the cliff of the Rhine threatening tradesmen.

  769. @A123
    @Matra


    @Mr. Hack

    Like I said before you are loyal to a foreign country, one in which you probably have only visited, if even that. People like you have ruined the US yet you have no shame about it.
     
    The idea that the U.S. must be bled dry for Ukie-stan is absurd. This is not WW II. Putin reclaiming the most Russian part of The Ukraine region is not a threat to America.

    If you go back to the beginning of the discussion, I was actually relatively neutral on the matter. The histrionic and unrealistic Ukie Maximalists here have pushed me towards a pro-Russia stance. Not because Putin is great. It is because Zelensky so loathsome.

    I now understand & accept that there was little Putin could do. The European WEF created and continues to drives Kiev aggression. When one has a violent neighbor, there is a duty to rescue the defenseless from such evil. That is how so many anti-Communist Cubans wound up in Florida.

    What Ukraine needs most is a leader who will negotiate in good faith.

    PEACE 😇

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @Emil Nikola Richard

    This is not WW II.

    WWII was a total bankers’ scam A to Z.

    How it works: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/726546.Tragedy_and_Hope

    That is > 1000 pp. Most of it is duller than Captain Kangaroo. If you are persistent all the relevant facts are in there. (except one!)

  770. @Bashibuzuk
    @LatW

    I like the old wooden churches most because they are probably the closest to our ancestors Old Faith temples in the pre-Christian times.



    It is interesting to compare old North European wooden churches to the wooden Hindu temples in Northern India.

    https://img.traveltriangle.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Temples-In-Manali_28th-jan.jpg

    https://img.traveltriangle.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Jamula-Temple_28th-jan-400x229.jpg

    https://img.traveltriangle.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Vashisht-Temple-Manali-2-400x229.jpg

    We can easily imagine how a similar building erected on a larger scale painted red and decorated with elaborate carvings stood in Arkona as described by the Crusaders.

    http://www.findmessages.com/wood-carving-south-eastern-pillar-at-hidimba-devi-temple-manali-himachal-pradesh-india

    https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTjBk0cfptg3yktnWimwWcqD4lmIC4WA6wGhw&usqp=CAU

    https://c8.alamy.com/comp/A01RKW/india-himachal-pradesh-manali-vashisht-hindu-temple-woodcarving-detail-A01RKW.jpg

    Replies: @Barbarossa, @LatW

    We can easily imagine how a similar building erected on a larger scale painted red and decorated with elaborate carvings stood in Arkona as described by the Crusaders.

    From what I’ve heard in certain tales, is that the Arkona temple may have been located on a rock on the coast. But maybe those are just myths to make it appear more majestic.

    [MORE]

    Here is a cute church that was relatively recently built in the late 19th century (in fact, I recently posted a clip with a much larger, more flashy looking church that was just built (The Church of Our Lady of Kazan’ in Latvia), but the original one was this smaller, wooden church, I wish they had rebuilt it exactly the way it was, especially since wood has been making a comeback lately, but, of course, they had to build a more imposing one, unfortunately, the Commies demolished the original one). The photo is from 1910.

    • Replies: @Bashibuzuk
    @LatW

    Yes the Svyatovit (Svantevit) temple supposedly stood on a great white rock facing the sea at Cap Arkona.


    A detailed description of the idol of Svyatovit and the famous Arkona temple was left to us by an eyewitness to the destruction of this temple, Saxo Grammaticus (d. 1204).

    “The city of Arkona,” he writes, “lies on the top of a high cliff; from the north, east and south it is fenced with natural protection, ... on the western side it is protected by a high mound of 50 cubits ... In the middle of the city lies an open area on which rises a wooden temple, of excellent work, but respected not so much for the splendor of architecture, but for the majesty of God to whom an idol was erected here. The entire outer side of the temple shone with skillfully made bas-reliefs of various figures, but ugly and crudely painted.
     

    Only one entrance was inside the temple, surrounded by a double fence: the outer fence consisted of a thick wall with a red roof; the inner one consisted of four strong columns, which, not connected by a solid wall, were hung with carpets that reached to the ground, and adjoined the outer fence with only a few arches and a roof. In the temple itself stood a large idol, with four heads, on the same number of necks, two of which went out to the chest and two to the back, but in such a way that one of both front and both rear heads looked to the right and the other to the left; hair and beard were cut short; and in this, it seemed, the artist was in keeping with the custom of Ruyani (Rugians/Rani).

    In his right hand, the idol held a horn made of various metals, which was filled every year with mead from the hands of a priest, for divination about the fertility of the next year; the left hand, with which the idol leaned to the side, was like a bow. Outerwear went down to the thigs, which were made up of various types of wood and were so skillfully connected to the knees that only with accurate examination could one distinguish seams.

    Svyatovit's feet were level with the ground, their foundation was made under the floor. In a small distance, the bridle and saddle of the idol with other accessories were visible; most of all, the sword of enormous size struck the imagination, the scabbard and hilt, in addition to beautiful carved forms, were distinguished by beautiful silver trim ... To maintain the idol of Svyatovit, each inhabitant of the island of Ruyan contributed moneys.

    God Svyatovit was given a third of the booty and raiding, believing that his protection would grant success; three hundred horses and the same number of riders were kept at the temple in Arkona, who handed over all the booty to the high priest of Svyatovit. The craft workshops made various decorations for the temple; the treasures of the temple were kept in chests under locks; in them, besides a huge amount of gold, lay a lot of purple clothes, but rotten and thin from dilapidation.

    In the temple of Arkona, one could see many public and private gifts donated by pious in vows requiring help, because the whole Slavic land gave tribute to the idol of Svyatovit. Even the neighboring sovereigns sent their gifts to Svyatovit with reverence, and the Danish king Sven brought a bowl of the most skillful decoration as a gift to propitiate God ...

    At the temple of Svyatovit in Arkona there was a completely white horse, with a long tail and a mane that was never sheared. Only the high priest of the temple could feed him and ride him, so that ordinary riding would not humiliate the divine animal. The Slavs believed that on this white horse Svyatovit was waging war against the enemies of his sanctuary; a horse that stood in a stall at night was often covered in foam and mud in the morning, as if he had returned from a long journey."

     https://ru-sled.ru/sviatilishe-arkona-na-ostrove-ryugen/

    Replies: @LatW, @Bashibuzuk

  771. Bashibuzuk says:
    @LatW
    @Bashibuzuk


    We can easily imagine how a similar building erected on a larger scale painted red and decorated with elaborate carvings stood in Arkona as described by the Crusaders.
     
    From what I've heard in certain tales, is that the Arkona temple may have been located on a rock on the coast. But maybe those are just myths to make it appear more majestic.


    Here is a cute church that was relatively recently built in the late 19th century (in fact, I recently posted a clip with a much larger, more flashy looking church that was just built (The Church of Our Lady of Kazan' in Latvia), but the original one was this smaller, wooden church, I wish they had rebuilt it exactly the way it was, especially since wood has been making a comeback lately, but, of course, they had to build a more imposing one, unfortunately, the Commies demolished the original one). The photo is from 1910.

    http://www.kazanskijhram.lv/uploads/Edinburga.jpg

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

    Yes the Svyatovit (Svantevit) temple supposedly stood on a great white rock facing the sea at Cap Arkona.

    A detailed description of the idol of Svyatovit and the famous Arkona temple was left to us by an eyewitness to the destruction of this temple, Saxo Grammaticus (d. 1204).

    “The city of Arkona,” he writes, “lies on the top of a high cliff; from the north, east and south it is fenced with natural protection, … on the western side it is protected by a high mound of 50 cubits … In the middle of the city lies an open area on which rises a wooden temple, of excellent work, but respected not so much for the splendor of architecture, but for the majesty of God to whom an idol was erected here. The entire outer side of the temple shone with skillfully made bas-reliefs of various figures, but ugly and crudely painted.

    [MORE]

    Only one entrance was inside the temple, surrounded by a double fence: the outer fence consisted of a thick wall with a red roof; the inner one consisted of four strong columns, which, not connected by a solid wall, were hung with carpets that reached to the ground, and adjoined the outer fence with only a few arches and a roof. In the temple itself stood a large idol, with four heads, on the same number of necks, two of which went out to the chest and two to the back, but in such a way that one of both front and both rear heads looked to the right and the other to the left; hair and beard were cut short; and in this, it seemed, the artist was in keeping with the custom of Ruyani (Rugians/Rani).

    In his right hand, the idol held a horn made of various metals, which was filled every year with mead from the hands of a priest, for divination about the fertility of the next year; the left hand, with which the idol leaned to the side, was like a bow. Outerwear went down to the thigs, which were made up of various types of wood and were so skillfully connected to the knees that only with accurate examination could one distinguish seams.

    Svyatovit’s feet were level with the ground, their foundation was made under the floor. In a small distance, the bridle and saddle of the idol with other accessories were visible; most of all, the sword of enormous size struck the imagination, the scabbard and hilt, in addition to beautiful carved forms, were distinguished by beautiful silver trim … To maintain the idol of Svyatovit, each inhabitant of the island of Ruyan contributed moneys.

    God Svyatovit was given a third of the booty and raiding, believing that his protection would grant success; three hundred horses and the same number of riders were kept at the temple in Arkona, who handed over all the booty to the high priest of Svyatovit. The craft workshops made various decorations for the temple; the treasures of the temple were kept in chests under locks; in them, besides a huge amount of gold, lay a lot of purple clothes, but rotten and thin from dilapidation.

    In the temple of Arkona, one could see many public and private gifts donated by pious in vows requiring help, because the whole Slavic land gave tribute to the idol of Svyatovit. Even the neighboring sovereigns sent their gifts to Svyatovit with reverence, and the Danish king Sven brought a bowl of the most skillful decoration as a gift to propitiate God …

    At the temple of Svyatovit in Arkona there was a completely white horse, with a long tail and a mane that was never sheared. Only the high priest of the temple could feed him and ride him, so that ordinary riding would not humiliate the divine animal. The Slavs believed that on this white horse Svyatovit was waging war against the enemies of his sanctuary; a horse that stood in a stall at night was often covered in foam and mud in the morning, as if he had returned from a long journey.”

    https://ru-sled.ru/sviatilishe-arkona-na-ostrove-ryugen/

    • Thanks: LatW
    • Replies: @LatW
    @Bashibuzuk


    completely white horse
     
    There was divination with a white horse in the Baltic tradition, too.


    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/21/Arturs_Baumanis_Likte%C5%86a_zirgs_1887.jpg


    The Lithuanian myths feature white twin horses (Ašvieniai) similar to Ashvins in Rigveda.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

    , @Bashibuzuk
    @Bashibuzuk


    A number of authors identified Wagrians-Varins with Varangians known from Russian, Scandinavian and Byzantine sources[8]. This version was first voiced by the German diplomat Sigismund von Herberstein, who, being an adviser to the ambassador to the Moscow state in the first half of the 16th century, was one of the first Europeans to get acquainted with the Russian chronicles and expressed his opinion about the origin of the Varangians:

    ... since they themselves call the Baltic Sea the Varangian Sea ... then I thought that due to the proximity of the princes they had Swedes, Danes or Prussians. However, the region of the Vandals with the famous city of Wagria once bordered Lübeck and the Duchy of Holstein, so that, as is believed, the Baltic Sea got its name from this Wagria; since ... the Vandals then not only differed in power, but also had a common language, customs and faith with the Russians, then, in my opinion, it was natural for the Russians to call the sovereigns of the Wagrians, in other words, the Varangians, and not cede power to strangers who were different from them and faith, and customs, and language[7].

    V. N. Tatishchev also brought the term "Varangian" closer to the name of the Slavic tribe Wagrians9].
     
    https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%92%D0%B0%D0%B3%D1%80%D1%8B

    Today it is no secret that at least a third of modern Germany in the Middle Ages in the period from the 5th century. to the 13th century occupied by the Polabian Slavs. Ethnically they are very close to Poles, Czechs, Slovaks. They were called Polabsky because in the west their territories bordered on the Laba River (now the Elbe) and a tributary of the Sala River (now the Zale). That is, they lived "along the Laba". In the east, the border of the Polabian Slavs was up to the Vodra River (now the Oder). In the north - to the Baltic Sea, in the south - to the Ore Mountains (now it is the border between Saxony and Bohemia). The Polabian Slavs had three large tribal unions: Lusatians (this people still exists), Lutichi and Bodrichi.

    Wagry, who lived on the peninsula of Wagria, were members of the Obodrite union. It is possible that "Wagry" is the German version of their name, since some German experts believe that it means "living on the sea." Another variant of the name of the tribe is also known - the Variny, but it is not entirely clear what this means. In addition, in the German chronicles there is the word "Vary", also referring to this tribe.

    The capital of the Wagrians was Starigrad (aka Stargard), which means "Old City". Now it is a small German town of Oldenburg in Holstein. Literally translated as "Old Town in Holstein". That is, the name was simply translated into German.
     
    https://www.swargas.ru/news/vagry-slavyane-shlezvig-golshteyna

    Interesting historical coincidence, the Romanovs, who claimed an Old Prussian ancestry, ended intermarried with the German Princes of Schleswig Holstein and so have been also more appropriately called Holstein-Gottorp Romanovs.
  772. @Bashibuzuk
    @LatW

    Yes the Svyatovit (Svantevit) temple supposedly stood on a great white rock facing the sea at Cap Arkona.


    A detailed description of the idol of Svyatovit and the famous Arkona temple was left to us by an eyewitness to the destruction of this temple, Saxo Grammaticus (d. 1204).

    “The city of Arkona,” he writes, “lies on the top of a high cliff; from the north, east and south it is fenced with natural protection, ... on the western side it is protected by a high mound of 50 cubits ... In the middle of the city lies an open area on which rises a wooden temple, of excellent work, but respected not so much for the splendor of architecture, but for the majesty of God to whom an idol was erected here. The entire outer side of the temple shone with skillfully made bas-reliefs of various figures, but ugly and crudely painted.
     

    Only one entrance was inside the temple, surrounded by a double fence: the outer fence consisted of a thick wall with a red roof; the inner one consisted of four strong columns, which, not connected by a solid wall, were hung with carpets that reached to the ground, and adjoined the outer fence with only a few arches and a roof. In the temple itself stood a large idol, with four heads, on the same number of necks, two of which went out to the chest and two to the back, but in such a way that one of both front and both rear heads looked to the right and the other to the left; hair and beard were cut short; and in this, it seemed, the artist was in keeping with the custom of Ruyani (Rugians/Rani).

    In his right hand, the idol held a horn made of various metals, which was filled every year with mead from the hands of a priest, for divination about the fertility of the next year; the left hand, with which the idol leaned to the side, was like a bow. Outerwear went down to the thigs, which were made up of various types of wood and were so skillfully connected to the knees that only with accurate examination could one distinguish seams.

    Svyatovit's feet were level with the ground, their foundation was made under the floor. In a small distance, the bridle and saddle of the idol with other accessories were visible; most of all, the sword of enormous size struck the imagination, the scabbard and hilt, in addition to beautiful carved forms, were distinguished by beautiful silver trim ... To maintain the idol of Svyatovit, each inhabitant of the island of Ruyan contributed moneys.

    God Svyatovit was given a third of the booty and raiding, believing that his protection would grant success; three hundred horses and the same number of riders were kept at the temple in Arkona, who handed over all the booty to the high priest of Svyatovit. The craft workshops made various decorations for the temple; the treasures of the temple were kept in chests under locks; in them, besides a huge amount of gold, lay a lot of purple clothes, but rotten and thin from dilapidation.

    In the temple of Arkona, one could see many public and private gifts donated by pious in vows requiring help, because the whole Slavic land gave tribute to the idol of Svyatovit. Even the neighboring sovereigns sent their gifts to Svyatovit with reverence, and the Danish king Sven brought a bowl of the most skillful decoration as a gift to propitiate God ...

    At the temple of Svyatovit in Arkona there was a completely white horse, with a long tail and a mane that was never sheared. Only the high priest of the temple could feed him and ride him, so that ordinary riding would not humiliate the divine animal. The Slavs believed that on this white horse Svyatovit was waging war against the enemies of his sanctuary; a horse that stood in a stall at night was often covered in foam and mud in the morning, as if he had returned from a long journey."

     https://ru-sled.ru/sviatilishe-arkona-na-ostrove-ryugen/

    Replies: @LatW, @Bashibuzuk

    completely white horse

    There was divination with a white horse in the Baltic tradition, too.

    The Lithuanian myths feature white twin horses (Ašvieniai) similar to Ashvins in Rigveda.

    • Replies: @Bashibuzuk
    @LatW

    They had the same religious tradition. Just the local names of the gods differed somewhat. Also, all the gods were seen as emanations of the Highest God.

    BTW, the story about the Svantevit Knights riding white horses in battle, might be directly linked to the poem you have posted about kights/priests hanging their swords on the trees.

    And the ancient Slav name for a valiant knight is витязь, transliterated as vityaz' which might be translated as "I am Vit" (Vit = Wisdom, hence Svyatovit = the One of Luminous Wisdom). Don't think the heroic knights of the past being named this way is just a coincidence.

    Replies: @LatW

  773. Bashibuzuk says:
    @Bashibuzuk
    @LatW

    Yes the Svyatovit (Svantevit) temple supposedly stood on a great white rock facing the sea at Cap Arkona.


    A detailed description of the idol of Svyatovit and the famous Arkona temple was left to us by an eyewitness to the destruction of this temple, Saxo Grammaticus (d. 1204).

    “The city of Arkona,” he writes, “lies on the top of a high cliff; from the north, east and south it is fenced with natural protection, ... on the western side it is protected by a high mound of 50 cubits ... In the middle of the city lies an open area on which rises a wooden temple, of excellent work, but respected not so much for the splendor of architecture, but for the majesty of God to whom an idol was erected here. The entire outer side of the temple shone with skillfully made bas-reliefs of various figures, but ugly and crudely painted.
     

    Only one entrance was inside the temple, surrounded by a double fence: the outer fence consisted of a thick wall with a red roof; the inner one consisted of four strong columns, which, not connected by a solid wall, were hung with carpets that reached to the ground, and adjoined the outer fence with only a few arches and a roof. In the temple itself stood a large idol, with four heads, on the same number of necks, two of which went out to the chest and two to the back, but in such a way that one of both front and both rear heads looked to the right and the other to the left; hair and beard were cut short; and in this, it seemed, the artist was in keeping with the custom of Ruyani (Rugians/Rani).

    In his right hand, the idol held a horn made of various metals, which was filled every year with mead from the hands of a priest, for divination about the fertility of the next year; the left hand, with which the idol leaned to the side, was like a bow. Outerwear went down to the thigs, which were made up of various types of wood and were so skillfully connected to the knees that only with accurate examination could one distinguish seams.

    Svyatovit's feet were level with the ground, their foundation was made under the floor. In a small distance, the bridle and saddle of the idol with other accessories were visible; most of all, the sword of enormous size struck the imagination, the scabbard and hilt, in addition to beautiful carved forms, were distinguished by beautiful silver trim ... To maintain the idol of Svyatovit, each inhabitant of the island of Ruyan contributed moneys.

    God Svyatovit was given a third of the booty and raiding, believing that his protection would grant success; three hundred horses and the same number of riders were kept at the temple in Arkona, who handed over all the booty to the high priest of Svyatovit. The craft workshops made various decorations for the temple; the treasures of the temple were kept in chests under locks; in them, besides a huge amount of gold, lay a lot of purple clothes, but rotten and thin from dilapidation.

    In the temple of Arkona, one could see many public and private gifts donated by pious in vows requiring help, because the whole Slavic land gave tribute to the idol of Svyatovit. Even the neighboring sovereigns sent their gifts to Svyatovit with reverence, and the Danish king Sven brought a bowl of the most skillful decoration as a gift to propitiate God ...

    At the temple of Svyatovit in Arkona there was a completely white horse, with a long tail and a mane that was never sheared. Only the high priest of the temple could feed him and ride him, so that ordinary riding would not humiliate the divine animal. The Slavs believed that on this white horse Svyatovit was waging war against the enemies of his sanctuary; a horse that stood in a stall at night was often covered in foam and mud in the morning, as if he had returned from a long journey."

     https://ru-sled.ru/sviatilishe-arkona-na-ostrove-ryugen/

    Replies: @LatW, @Bashibuzuk

    [MORE]

    A number of authors identified Wagrians-Varins with Varangians known from Russian, Scandinavian and Byzantine sources[8]. This version was first voiced by the German diplomat Sigismund von Herberstein, who, being an adviser to the ambassador to the Moscow state in the first half of the 16th century, was one of the first Europeans to get acquainted with the Russian chronicles and expressed his opinion about the origin of the Varangians:

    since they themselves call the Baltic Sea the Varangian Sea … then I thought that due to the proximity of the princes they had Swedes, Danes or Prussians. However, the region of the Vandals with the famous city of Wagria once bordered Lübeck and the Duchy of Holstein, so that, as is believed, the Baltic Sea got its name from this Wagria; since … the Vandals then not only differed in power, but also had a common language, customs and faith with the Russians, then, in my opinion, it was natural for the Russians to call the sovereigns of the Wagrians, in other words, the Varangians, and not cede power to strangers who were different from them and faith, and customs, and language[7].

    V. N. Tatishchev also brought the term “Varangian” closer to the name of the Slavic tribe Wagrians9].

    https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%92%D0%B0%D0%B3%D1%80%D1%8B

    Today it is no secret that at least a third of modern Germany in the Middle Ages in the period from the 5th century. to the 13th century occupied by the Polabian Slavs. Ethnically they are very close to Poles, Czechs, Slovaks. They were called Polabsky because in the west their territories bordered on the Laba River (now the Elbe) and a tributary of the Sala River (now the Zale). That is, they lived “along the Laba”. In the east, the border of the Polabian Slavs was up to the Vodra River (now the Oder). In the north – to the Baltic Sea, in the south – to the Ore Mountains (now it is the border between Saxony and Bohemia). The Polabian Slavs had three large tribal unions: Lusatians (this people still exists), Lutichi and Bodrichi.

    Wagry, who lived on the peninsula of Wagria, were members of the Obodrite union. It is possible that “Wagry” is the German version of their name, since some German experts believe that it means “living on the sea.” Another variant of the name of the tribe is also known – the Variny, but it is not entirely clear what this means. In addition, in the German chronicles there is the word “Vary”, also referring to this tribe.

    The capital of the Wagrians was Starigrad (aka Stargard), which means “Old City”. Now it is a small German town of Oldenburg in Holstein. Literally translated as “Old Town in Holstein”. That is, the name was simply translated into German.

    https://www.swargas.ru/news/vagry-slavyane-shlezvig-golshteyna

    Interesting historical coincidence, the Romanovs, who claimed an Old Prussian ancestry, ended intermarried with the German Princes of Schleswig Holstein and so have been also more appropriately called Holstein-Gottorp Romanovs.

  774. Bashibuzuk says:
    @LatW
    @Bashibuzuk


    completely white horse
     
    There was divination with a white horse in the Baltic tradition, too.


    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/21/Arturs_Baumanis_Likte%C5%86a_zirgs_1887.jpg


    The Lithuanian myths feature white twin horses (Ašvieniai) similar to Ashvins in Rigveda.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

    They had the same religious tradition. Just the local names of the gods differed somewhat. Also, all the gods were seen as emanations of the Highest God.

    BTW, the story about the Svantevit Knights riding white horses in battle, might be directly linked to the poem you have posted about kights/priests hanging their swords on the trees.

    And the ancient Slav name for a valiant knight is витязь, transliterated as vityaz‘ which might be translated as “I am Vit” (Vit = Wisdom, hence Svyatovit = the One of Luminous Wisdom). Don’t think the heroic knights of the past being named this way is just a coincidence.

    • Replies: @LatW
    @Bashibuzuk


    They had the same religious tradition. Just the local names of the gods differed somewhat. Also, all the gods were seen as emanations of the Highest God.
     
    Of course, as I posted above, there is the Highest God. Described very endearingly, btw. But these traditions also differ internally even if it is one common Tradition - and I love that they differ a little but still go back to the same root. In the Baltic tradition, the God of Thunder is very prominent. By the way, there is also a Goddess of Fate and Destiny (similar to Fortuna), Laima (pronounced lah-ee-mah), who is very similar to Lakshmi. And the three Norns (One Goddess with three manifestations).

    And the ancient Slav name for a valiant knight is витязь, transliterated as vityaz‘ which might be translated as “I am Vit” (Vit = Wisdom, hence Svyatovit = the One of Luminous Wisdom). Don’t think the heroic knights of the past being named this way is just a coincidence.

     

    Yes, I've always found this class of vityaz' very appealing, it's clear that they weren't just higher rank soldiers. I think wherever you see vit or ved... it is something accociated with special knowledge (vieds in Latvian, wise, in Slavic language this is related to a special sight, ability to see things others can't).

    Yes, there is a set of ancient Latvian poems (very few, compared to other types but that can be explained - this was a small group of people who may have even lived separately and been a bit secretive), that are called bramaņi who were originally the priestly class, then later with the disruptions, they turned into what may have been a privileged wealthy class or noblemen (but this would've already been very very late, well after the 13th century, of course). For example, the Germans didn't fully destroy the Curonian noblemen but arranged for them to live separately.

    We are used to idealizing these ancient Balto-Slav priests and typically the image we have is of some very peaceful wise elder with a bent staff who retreats into the sacred grove spending days there (the name for Prussian priest is kriwe, кривой in Russian, to describe a bent staff (стержень), btw, Russians in Latvian are krievi, may or may not be a coincidence or may be just named after the Krivichi tribe further east). This elder type, undoubtedly, was there, even well into the Middle Ages apparently), but it's possible that there was also some kind of a more vigorous priestly kshatriya class. From what I remember from Evola, there was some movement between these classes (although he is not a real historian, ofc). Of course, I wouldn't rely on Evola for this kind of information, no matter how fascinating, but more on the ancient lore (daina) on which I rely practically exclusively anyway.

    The full poem (daina) goes as follows:

    "The Brahmin rode up on the high hill,
    They hung their swords on the sacred tree.
    The sacred tree has nine branches,
    At the tip of each branch - nine flowers,
    At the tip of each flower - nine berries".

    Sometimes the poem follows on describing a bee that rushes over to the tree, picks one of the berries and takes it to the "Cradle of dear Māra" (Earth Goddess, the keeper of the material world, Demeter). So it could actually be a poem about the transmitting of the divine power (and divine knowledge) onto the living world. Maybe the birthing of the natural world?

    Remember that bees, the bee keeping tradition and honey (medus, мёд) were very important in ancient IE culture. And in Vedic teachings, there is Madhu-vidya, Madhava. Blissful knowledge.

    Nine is the most important number in Baltic numerology (3, 9, 3 x 9, very common and would mostly signify "plenty", maybe "a multitude that a mind cannot fathom").

    Think about it. How can one elderly priest just live in the grove? There would have to be others to protect him or form a group around him. And these couldn't be just anybody - but someone who may have partaken in the knowledge. I don't know, I am just guessing.

    Replies: @Dmitry

  775. Someone ought to explain “rods of God” to Greenblatt.

    • Replies: @A123
    @songbird

    Do you mean Centauri Mass Drivers?

    PEACE 😇
    ________

    Start at ~1:50 if the auto advance does not work.

    https://youtu.be/Nj6t53kUAmo?t=112

    Replies: @songbird

  776. @songbird
    Someone ought to explain "rods of God" to Greenblatt.

    Replies: @A123

    Do you mean Centauri Mass Drivers?

    PEACE 😇
    ________

    Start at ~1:50 if the auto advance does not work.

    • Replies: @songbird
    @A123

    From LEO, believe all you need to do is drop it (physical spring?). This assumes full resuse and consequently dirt cheap lift.

    I see mass drivers as being more for the Moon, where you have got to get past the lunar gravity well. Or if the cost equation doesn't pan out.

    But perhaps a Moon base with mass drivers would be best strategically, as, in principal, it would likely be easier to defend/harder to surveil than Earth-based rocket launch sites.

    BTW, I will give Bab 5 props for bringing the idea to TV. Too often Star Trek was just techno-babel.

  777. @Bashibuzuk
    @LatW

    They had the same religious tradition. Just the local names of the gods differed somewhat. Also, all the gods were seen as emanations of the Highest God.

    BTW, the story about the Svantevit Knights riding white horses in battle, might be directly linked to the poem you have posted about kights/priests hanging their swords on the trees.

    And the ancient Slav name for a valiant knight is витязь, transliterated as vityaz' which might be translated as "I am Vit" (Vit = Wisdom, hence Svyatovit = the One of Luminous Wisdom). Don't think the heroic knights of the past being named this way is just a coincidence.

    Replies: @LatW

    They had the same religious tradition. Just the local names of the gods differed somewhat. Also, all the gods were seen as emanations of the Highest God.

    Of course, as I posted above, there is the Highest God. Described very endearingly, btw. But these traditions also differ internally even if it is one common Tradition – and I love that they differ a little but still go back to the same root. In the Baltic tradition, the God of Thunder is very prominent. By the way, there is also a Goddess of Fate and Destiny (similar to Fortuna), Laima (pronounced lah-ee-mah), who is very similar to Lakshmi. And the three Norns (One Goddess with three manifestations).

    [MORE]

    And the ancient Slav name for a valiant knight is витязь, transliterated as vityaz‘ which might be translated as “I am Vit” (Vit = Wisdom, hence Svyatovit = the One of Luminous Wisdom). Don’t think the heroic knights of the past being named this way is just a coincidence.

    Yes, I’ve always found this class of vityaz’ very appealing, it’s clear that they weren’t just higher rank soldiers. I think wherever you see vit or ved… it is something accociated with special knowledge (vieds in Latvian, wise, in Slavic language this is related to a special sight, ability to see things others can’t).

    Yes, there is a set of ancient Latvian poems (very few, compared to other types but that can be explained – this was a small group of people who may have even lived separately and been a bit secretive), that are called bramaņi who were originally the priestly class, then later with the disruptions, they turned into what may have been a privileged wealthy class or noblemen (but this would’ve already been very very late, well after the 13th century, of course). For example, the Germans didn’t fully destroy the Curonian noblemen but arranged for them to live separately.

    We are used to idealizing these ancient Balto-Slav priests and typically the image we have is of some very peaceful wise elder with a bent staff who retreats into the sacred grove spending days there (the name for Prussian priest is kriwe, кривой in Russian, to describe a bent staff (стержень), btw, Russians in Latvian are krievi, may or may not be a coincidence or may be just named after the Krivichi tribe further east). This elder type, undoubtedly, was there, even well into the Middle Ages apparently), but it’s possible that there was also some kind of a more vigorous priestly kshatriya class. From what I remember from Evola, there was some movement between these classes (although he is not a real historian, ofc). Of course, I wouldn’t rely on Evola for this kind of information, no matter how fascinating, but more on the ancient lore (daina) on which I rely practically exclusively anyway.

    The full poem (daina) goes as follows:

    “The Brahmin rode up on the high hill,
    They hung their swords on the sacred tree.
    The sacred tree has nine branches,
    At the tip of each branch – nine flowers,
    At the tip of each flower – nine berries”.

    Sometimes the poem follows on describing a bee that rushes over to the tree, picks one of the berries and takes it to the “Cradle of dear Māra” (Earth Goddess, the keeper of the material world, Demeter). So it could actually be a poem about the transmitting of the divine power (and divine knowledge) onto the living world. Maybe the birthing of the natural world?

    Remember that bees, the bee keeping tradition and honey (medus, мёд) were very important in ancient IE culture. And in Vedic teachings, there is Madhu-vidya, Madhava. Blissful knowledge.

    Nine is the most important number in Baltic numerology (3, 9, 3 x 9, very common and would mostly signify “plenty”, maybe “a multitude that a mind cannot fathom”).

    Think about it. How can one elderly priest just live in the grove? There would have to be others to protect him or form a group around him. And these couldn’t be just anybody – but someone who may have partaken in the knowledge. I don’t know, I am just guessing.

    • Replies: @Dmitry
    @LatW

    In the ancient religions, they view the different gods, as aspects of each other. Different gods are mixed like the symbols of Ying and Yang.

    There is some later propaganda "pagans were worshipping different gods and pantheism was chaotic".

    But in Greece, for example, the pantheism was represented in the pantheon.

    The pantheon is the concept of the all in one. Difference is part of the same. Viewing the same from different perspective.

    Shiva is not without Vishnu. There is the nature of Apollo intermixing with Dionysus.

    For the people that read the Bible, they even know Satan is sometimes working to follow orders of God. Bible describes Satan working like God's employee. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Job%201&version=AMP Although in Medieval times, you could have been persecuted as Cathars for saying this and you would be hunted by the authorities as a heretic in the Pyrenees mountains. They were older parts of the Bible were writing in the Iron Age had perhaps seen this intermixing as the most obvious concept.

    Replies: @Dmitry, @Coconuts

  778. @A123
    @songbird

    Do you mean Centauri Mass Drivers?

    PEACE 😇
    ________

    Start at ~1:50 if the auto advance does not work.

    https://youtu.be/Nj6t53kUAmo?t=112

    Replies: @songbird

    From LEO, believe all you need to do is drop it (physical spring?). This assumes full resuse and consequently dirt cheap lift.

    I see mass drivers as being more for the Moon, where you have got to get past the lunar gravity well. Or if the cost equation doesn’t pan out.

    But perhaps a Moon base with mass drivers would be best strategically, as, in principal, it would likely be easier to defend/harder to surveil than Earth-based rocket launch sites.

    BTW, I will give Bab 5 props for bringing the idea to TV. Too often Star Trek was just techno-babel.

  779. @Mr. Hack
    @A123


    The idea that the U.S. must be bled dry for Ukie-stan is absurd.
     
    Another one of your lies, kremlinstoogeA123. America is not being bled dry, the economy is humming along, and want ads and help wanted signs are everywhere.

    Putin reclaiming the most Russian part of The Ukraine region is not a threat to America.
     
    Typical Apologists for Putin sort of junk. Don't you have anything better to offer than this?

    I now understand & accept that there was little Putin could do.
     
    You're understanding of things is very shallow. Poor, poor Putler, he was forced into a corner and needs to keep on bombing civilians and their homes and cities. His military, after all, is second rate and can't directly take on the Ukrainian military.

    The European WEF created and continues to drives Kiev aggression.
     
    There is no "Kyiv agression" you knucklehead. Ukraine was from the start and continues to this day to be on the defensive. It was Russia that invaded Ukraine, not the other way around. I don't understand how somebody with a supposedly self purported high IQ is incapable of understanding anything as simple as this?

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    Ukraine is acting like an annoying Palatinate Baron perched on the cliff of the Rhine threatening tradesmen.

  780. @Bashibuzuk
    @Mr. Hack

    They're what is called in Russian новодел. Wallachian became Romanian, and Rusyn/Ruthenian became Ukrainian in nineteenth century. And they're already on the cusp of extinction through anemic demography and emigration. Something didn't work right...

    Both Romanians and Ukrainians like to say it was their Socialist experience that brought them to this sad state of ephemeral nation-statehood. But I have another explanation, a more esoteric one (I like esoteric explanations). They are dying as the RusFed is dying and the Globalized West (including the Extreme Oriental dominions - Japan and Korea) and China are dying because of apostasy. Apostasy to the spiritual traditions of their ancestors. They have cut the spiritual chain that goes to the beginnings of their bloodlines. So did Iranians whose demography is in free fall too.

    But Arabs, Jews, most Black people and Hindustani people grow and multiply because they are still well aligned with their ancestral beliefs. To kill a people, first one needs to kill their gods. The more extreme the apostasy and the more rapid the eventual extinction. The meek shall not inherit the earth, they shall become self-centered and stop having babies. Their lands and their riches will be given to their more aggressive masters. That's "esoteric biology" for you Mr Hack.

    😉

    Replies: @Dmitry

    Svyatovit (Svantevit) temple

    The god with four direction which can be related to the same theme as Brahma.

    grow and multiply because they are still well aligned with their ancestral

    In a few years, people have grown and multiply thousand times more than the normal number in the majority of species history.

    This is the combination with technology (the cause of the vast population boom) surely a main cause of our psychological disillusioning of the last few centuries.

    With this population overgrowth, you would assume more like species wisdom to reduce the birthrate will be naturally, or there would be something like nuclear war unnaturally to reduce the overgrowth.

    You would assume more spiritual people connected to the species wisdom, would be reducing birthrate naturally, as continued population growth could only result in an unnatural disaster to reduce the overgrowth like nuclear wars. .

    If bacteria will have overgrowth like this in the close laboratory jar, it would change external conditions to destroy the whole group of bacteria.

    In human psychology terms, it’s not very romantic, when land has been converted to car parking and logistics warehouses.

    You can say the problem with the particular type of industrial culture (that you dislike Amazon or capitalism or communism), but it’s more for all of the human history until the last few minutes, we were always surrounded with nonpopulated, nonagriculture, nonhuman spaces with the undamaged forests, living in societies with a few dozen people.

    Arabs, Jews, most Black people and Hindustani people grow and multiply because they are still well aligned with their ancestral beliefs. To kill a people, first one needs to kill their gods.

    I don’t think today birthrates correlated negatively with the level of spiritual destruction of the community or the tribe.

    For example, Tuvans have one of the highest birthrate in Russia. Of course, not officially written, but you can infer from regional variation in Russia. https://rg.ru/2020/09/09/reg-skfo/nazvany-regiony-s-samoj-vysokoj-rozhdaemostiu-i-smertnostiu.html

    Every community in Russia and all the postsoviet space is relatively spiritually broken. But Tuvans have been really a spiritually broken and destroyed community, perhaps the most spiritually broken nationality in the region.

    Similarly, especially before abortion was promoted, African Americans have until recently always a higher birthrate than average Americans. But the African Americans have been one of the groups most broken by the modernity, with their gods and spirituality surviving only by translation to the culture of their European slave owners.

    You know, the classic symptoms of being spiritually broken people, like the Native Americans and Tuvans – you can only see alcohol shops in some of the ghettos. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cGuDPcjaVo0.

    As for Haredi Jews, like Amish, they have a highbirth rate, in our current context mainly because they are in a cult living in a developed countries, which bans birthcontrol. So, birthrate correlates with religious conformism in this recent context.

    But before recent invention of birthcontrol (and in third world countries today), historically, people have children as the inevitable result of lust. You cannot follow lust, without resulting children.

    Having children is the inevitable result of lust and also evidence of lust. Therefore, there were anti-natalist religions like Christianity in New Testament and first millennium, as having children is a sign of lust which is viewed negatively, and which for Paul can only be a second best option.

    In Christianity, the more spiritual people, would historically become celibate, like most saints in the last couple millennium, most clergy, monks, nuns, which is said as the best option directly by Paul. Excluding not just some extreme people like Origen, level of your spirituality or religious conformism would negatively correlate with the number of your children and they constructed monasteries all around Europe that allow the childless, semi-nonworking people to have the sometimes utopian community. And of course, in Buddhism the similar tradition.

    It’s because Christianity has viewed lust as negative and having children is a compromise only for someone who cannot control their lust (as Paul writes directly).

    • Replies: @Coconuts
    @Dmitry


    You would assume more spiritual people connected to the species wisdom, would be reducing birthrate naturally, as continued population growth could only result in an unnatural disaster to reduce the overgrowth like nuclear wars.
     
    This is an interesting topic with many aspects; humans are often described as selfish cooperators, in that they are both self-interested and altruistic at the same time. The evolutionary aspect of large numbers of people willingly sacrificing the future of their own genes for the sake of some surviving minority might seem counter intuitive. (Outside of the 'spiteful mutant' hypothesis I guess).

    Following David Sloane Wilson, iirc Christianity ends up being pro-natalist like the other Abrahamic faiths (I think even in the time of the declining Roman Empire, following the 'Christian sexual revolution'). The minority of celibates ends up enhancing the reproductive chances of their siblings and relations, similar to the 'gay uncle effect'.

    It seems particularly curious when white Europeans propagate anti-natalist doctrines among themselves, but not among non-white people living in the same country, and are simultaneously intent on growing their county's population, this is strange wisdom and might be some kind of ideological artefact (if it is not evidence of harmful mutations)?

  781. @QCIC
    @Mr. Hack

    Azovstal was a heavily fortified installation only about 30 miles from the Russian border. I was surprised how little this point was discussed. I am also surprised that people do not recognize this location was a big deal for Russia. I imagine there are similar emplacements near Kharkiv which are at least as bad in this combination of military presence and proximity to the border.

    Replies: @Wokechoke

    what’s the point of Kharkov if it isn’t a border town trading with Belgorod?

    • Replies: @QCIC
    @Wokechoke

    Good question. Kharkov was a major center for science and technology developed by the Soviets.

    Who knows what the future holds?

  782. @LatW
    @Bashibuzuk


    They had the same religious tradition. Just the local names of the gods differed somewhat. Also, all the gods were seen as emanations of the Highest God.
     
    Of course, as I posted above, there is the Highest God. Described very endearingly, btw. But these traditions also differ internally even if it is one common Tradition - and I love that they differ a little but still go back to the same root. In the Baltic tradition, the God of Thunder is very prominent. By the way, there is also a Goddess of Fate and Destiny (similar to Fortuna), Laima (pronounced lah-ee-mah), who is very similar to Lakshmi. And the three Norns (One Goddess with three manifestations).

    And the ancient Slav name for a valiant knight is витязь, transliterated as vityaz‘ which might be translated as “I am Vit” (Vit = Wisdom, hence Svyatovit = the One of Luminous Wisdom). Don’t think the heroic knights of the past being named this way is just a coincidence.

     

    Yes, I've always found this class of vityaz' very appealing, it's clear that they weren't just higher rank soldiers. I think wherever you see vit or ved... it is something accociated with special knowledge (vieds in Latvian, wise, in Slavic language this is related to a special sight, ability to see things others can't).

    Yes, there is a set of ancient Latvian poems (very few, compared to other types but that can be explained - this was a small group of people who may have even lived separately and been a bit secretive), that are called bramaņi who were originally the priestly class, then later with the disruptions, they turned into what may have been a privileged wealthy class or noblemen (but this would've already been very very late, well after the 13th century, of course). For example, the Germans didn't fully destroy the Curonian noblemen but arranged for them to live separately.

    We are used to idealizing these ancient Balto-Slav priests and typically the image we have is of some very peaceful wise elder with a bent staff who retreats into the sacred grove spending days there (the name for Prussian priest is kriwe, кривой in Russian, to describe a bent staff (стержень), btw, Russians in Latvian are krievi, may or may not be a coincidence or may be just named after the Krivichi tribe further east). This elder type, undoubtedly, was there, even well into the Middle Ages apparently), but it's possible that there was also some kind of a more vigorous priestly kshatriya class. From what I remember from Evola, there was some movement between these classes (although he is not a real historian, ofc). Of course, I wouldn't rely on Evola for this kind of information, no matter how fascinating, but more on the ancient lore (daina) on which I rely practically exclusively anyway.

    The full poem (daina) goes as follows:

    "The Brahmin rode up on the high hill,
    They hung their swords on the sacred tree.
    The sacred tree has nine branches,
    At the tip of each branch - nine flowers,
    At the tip of each flower - nine berries".

    Sometimes the poem follows on describing a bee that rushes over to the tree, picks one of the berries and takes it to the "Cradle of dear Māra" (Earth Goddess, the keeper of the material world, Demeter). So it could actually be a poem about the transmitting of the divine power (and divine knowledge) onto the living world. Maybe the birthing of the natural world?

    Remember that bees, the bee keeping tradition and honey (medus, мёд) were very important in ancient IE culture. And in Vedic teachings, there is Madhu-vidya, Madhava. Blissful knowledge.

    Nine is the most important number in Baltic numerology (3, 9, 3 x 9, very common and would mostly signify "plenty", maybe "a multitude that a mind cannot fathom").

    Think about it. How can one elderly priest just live in the grove? There would have to be others to protect him or form a group around him. And these couldn't be just anybody - but someone who may have partaken in the knowledge. I don't know, I am just guessing.

    Replies: @Dmitry

    In the ancient religions, they view the different gods, as aspects of each other. Different gods are mixed like the symbols of Ying and Yang.

    There is some later propaganda “pagans were worshipping different gods and pantheism was chaotic”.

    But in Greece, for example, the pantheism was represented in the pantheon.

    The pantheon is the concept of the all in one. Difference is part of the same. Viewing the same from different perspective.

    Shiva is not without Vishnu. There is the nature of Apollo intermixing with Dionysus.

    For the people that read the Bible, they even know Satan is sometimes working to follow orders of God. Bible describes Satan working like God’s employee. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Job%201&version=AMP Although in Medieval times, you could have been persecuted as Cathars for saying this and you would be hunted by the authorities as a heretic in the Pyrenees mountains. They were older parts of the Bible were writing in the Iron Age had perhaps seen this intermixing as the most obvious concept.

    • Replies: @Dmitry
    @Dmitry

    Oops wrong word here


    pantheism was represented in the pantheon.
     
    *"polytheism was represented in the pantheon".
    , @Coconuts
    @Dmitry


    But in Greece, for example, the pantheism was represented in the pantheon.
     
    I may be wrong about this but I thought pantheism was the idea that the universe is made of God so its contents are all parts of God. I also thought this idea that all gods contain aspects of each other could be syncretism without becoming pantheism, afaik Neo-Platonists would believe that all the gods reflect the One, but they are emanations of it and definitely not parts of it.

    Although in Medieval times, you could have been persecuted as Cathars for saying this and you would be hunted by the authorities as a heretic in the Pyrenees mountains.
     
    Again, I thought Cathars were supposed to be strong dualists and believe that matter was evil, this would seem to be the opposite of pantheism and thinking that matter is a part of God.

    There seems to be a developing trend among historians of Catharism to suggest it was as much a creation of medieval Churchmen and inquisitors as an existing distinct belief system, similar to the creation process of witchcraft beliefs in the late 15th/early 16th C.

    Replies: @silviosilver, @Dmitry

  783. @Dmitry
    @LatW

    In the ancient religions, they view the different gods, as aspects of each other. Different gods are mixed like the symbols of Ying and Yang.

    There is some later propaganda "pagans were worshipping different gods and pantheism was chaotic".

    But in Greece, for example, the pantheism was represented in the pantheon.

    The pantheon is the concept of the all in one. Difference is part of the same. Viewing the same from different perspective.

    Shiva is not without Vishnu. There is the nature of Apollo intermixing with Dionysus.

    For the people that read the Bible, they even know Satan is sometimes working to follow orders of God. Bible describes Satan working like God's employee. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Job%201&version=AMP Although in Medieval times, you could have been persecuted as Cathars for saying this and you would be hunted by the authorities as a heretic in the Pyrenees mountains. They were older parts of the Bible were writing in the Iron Age had perhaps seen this intermixing as the most obvious concept.

    Replies: @Dmitry, @Coconuts

    Oops wrong word here

    pantheism was represented in the pantheon.

    *”polytheism was represented in the pantheon”.

  784. Probably one of the better takes on the Kanye situation.

    [MORE]

    https://mobile.twitter.com/qin_duke/status/1588534604658376706

    The ADL openly bragging about leading a “advertiser boycott” of Twitter in order to pressure Elon to do its bidding should dispense with the fantasy that the West is a “free-market system”. It’s just as controlled as China. The difference is that in China you know who’s in charge. In the West you get in trouble for just asking the question.

    • Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Thulean Friend

    Kanye West is so stinking rich he bangs Kardashians.

    Sympathy for such an individual is an indication you need to get a life. If you or I had 1/20th of his dough we could be living in a nice house in a nice neighborhood minding our own business and not one single human on the planet need give two cents regarding anything about either of us for perpetuity.

    Replies: @Thulean Friend

    , @songbird
    @Thulean Friend

    What I think is remarkable about the story is that Musk appears to be something of an autist, and yet, he was still amazingly circumspect going into this. Saying that he was not the one to make the decision to let Kanye back, and willingly meeting with these different groups, which I am sure is not enjoyable.

    Replies: @Dmitry

  785. It seems that some time ago Bashi hacked my pc and stole everything on my hdd. To me personally it does not matter, but there was not just a scanned copy of my passport there but also personal information and documents of many other people that I have helped through my life in matters regarding immigration, getting job, visa or a refugee status in a EU country, including Ukrainian refugees. So I have made a notice to authorities and told my friends that their personal information has been stolen and they too should made such notice to authorities in their respective countries.

    [MORE]

    But then maybe I can reveal a few things about you Bashi, like that you are not a Russian nationalist, nor even a Russian, oh how naively do Balts here believe in your BS, but well at least you have demonstrated in practice to me how such folks(as a collective) will never be anything else than pawns in the games of the others´.

    Oh and if you got angry because I made a comment about the meaning of circumcision in a Buddhist context then Btw you should check great Buddhist master, a true Pandita, and your former tribesman Berzin’s list of major and minor marks of Buddha, where Berzin explains the karmic-causal reason for every body part of the Buddha, how fitting… It was through him that I learned the traditional Buddhist POV in regards of this matter. Maybe you should now dox and hack him, and then upload all his HDD to the internet?

    “His private organ is recessed and remains concealed. This comes from his having strictly kept his pledges of secrecy and having never revealed what was meant to be held confidentially.”

    https://studybuddhism.com/en/advanced-studies/lam-rim/refuge/the-32-major-marks-of-a-buddha-s-physical-body

    Bashi it’s one thing to harm oneself, like I have done, but to actively and pathologically to lie to others, constantly, to take something that is not yours, in other words to steal, and to claim spiritual understanding and achievements that one has not attained, these Bashi are heavy transgressions in the Dharma, a being that does such things casually has forsaken his intuitive capability to understand Dharma, at least during this current dream that we call our present LIFE. So deeply have you fallen into identity grasping that the rain of Dharma which extinguishes every fire and fever has transformed into an oil spill… If you Bashi think that I have done something bad through my words, then I should remind that you yourself have often here praised Russian Neo-Nazis, even claimed that Hitler would have been better than Stalin for the Russian people and so on and so on. Almost everything that you have written here about yourself has been lies, but almost everything that I have written here has been true, as you know through the contents of my HDD, only a few times I have lied through an omission, like not mentioning that I was very young when I visited the USSR, so young that I dont have memories of it.

    So Dont you think that it would be a good thing for you to self reflect? Even more pathetic is how you again and again write about the same things about the preservation of the bloodline and so on, are you in a doubt? A true believer has no need get affirmation for his beliefs in the internet. A religious person you are not, for an ill will and actively trying to do bad things to others comes to you naturally. Once again I repeat: there’s a great difference between doing harm to oneself and actively doing harm to others. You spend too much time here on the internet hacking and spying people, its quite sad if this is how you get your pleasure. Therefore I say to you, get a LIFE Bashi, go outside.

    Still you seem to be agitated and I do not want to leave you in a such state, therefore Bashi I will offer to you victory, you have succeeded in shaming me, and in spying me through your trojans and rootkits, you have even sometimes made me to have an agitated state of mind! Therefore dear Bashi I offer to you victory, smarter you are, full of cunningness, and every day thinking of new ways of defending of ones own kin. For this all I offer to you the sweet nectar cup of Victory!

    And because of you I have finally understood some of the verses of noble Shantideva:

    10. For the sake of accomplishing the welfare of all sentient
    beings, I freely give up my body, enjoyments, and all my
    virtues of the three times.

    11. Surrendering everything is nirvana, and my mind seeks
    nirvana. If I must surrender everything, it is
    better that I give it to sentient beings.

    12. For the sake of all beings I have made this body pleasureless.
    Let them continually beat it, revile it, and cover it with filth.6

    13. Let them play with my body. Let them laugh at it and
    ridicule it. What does it matter to me? I have given my body
    to them.

    14. Let them have me perform deeds that are conducive to their
    happiness.8 Whoever resorts to me, may it never be in vain.

    15. For those who have resorted to me and have an angry or unkind thought, may even that always be the cause for their accomplishing every goal.

    16. May those who falsely accuse me, who harm me, and who
    ridicule me all partake of Awakening

    Also Bashi I have long understood why Desire is bad, but never why Aversion is one the poisons according to the Buddha, after all is it not natural for us to try to escape bad things or try to become free of them, but NO, to believe that anything, whatsoever possesses permanent negative characteristics is a lie, an illusion of the mind. Therefore even you are truly my teacher, how happily I would have been continuing my mindless blabbering here without you creating obstacles, without you creating pressure that led me to think truly and profoundly the problems of my life and in my mind. Truly Bashi you are my teacher in the particular sense as one great ancient master of my school Geshe Langri Thangpa describes in his Eight Verses For the Training the Mind.

    After all everyone of us does receive or take things in life, everyone does receive something, but one day we will need to give everything away, even the smallest figment of our imagination, but in the next life depending on the manner how we have received and how we have given away…..
    Those who have taken in unwholesome ways, will receive unwholesome things, those who have given humbly and freely, without struggle, will get everything easily, almost spontaneously!
    After all penultimate words of Buddha Shakyamuni were: “There’s nothing of my own, that’s why I am happy!”

    Our mind will one day ceace, all good and bad in it, it is an fact, but we can choose the manner how it will cease, do we struggle and degenerate, desperately trying to hold back as the corruption and degradation that comes with decay when ald age and time takes everything mercilessly away, or do we bravely give everything away, understanding that as things go away, they also do come back, but never as same!

    I have not forgotten your question Coconuts, here is a short explanation how Madhyamika system logics works, bit different from western nominalism. https://twitter.com/sambwinslow/status/1331716185784770560

    I have only now little time ago started to truly believe, before that my faith was only purely rational and passive, I did not I have genuine living faith, emotionally felt, truly there is no greater treasure, no greater fulfillement of every wish. During the last summer I finally met my true Guru, my true Lama and I have now taken refugee into Him, confessed all my sins, without forgetting even a smallest detail. How liberating!

    I will not return here, for I have no interest to get hacked again(ahem javascript attacks), but before I leave I must say to Sher Singh that I am very graceful to you that I have learned more about Sikhi Dharma, truly Shaivism, Vaishnavism, Jainism, Shaktism, Buddhism and Sikhism are just different manifestations of ONE ETERNAL TRUTH. For those who are saved by the God’s grace there is the Vishnu, for those are saved by realising that their nature is same as the God’s, there is the Shiva, and for those who believe that Man can attain the Godly state there is the Buddha… and so on….
    Together we are one living super organism, and Sikhi Dharma is same as Kshatriya Dharma, necessary prerequisite that there can one day be suitable conditions for Brahmacharya life, so that the holy life could exist and flourish!

    Btw my knowledge was lacking about Vishnu in regards of Buddhadharma

    Here is what is written in an extremely important Mahayana Sutra, Lalitavistarasutra, in which Buddha’s life story as a man is told.

    “Because he is endowed with the great strength of Nārāyaṇa, he is called the Great Nārāyaṇa. Because he is endowed with power to tame many millions of demons, he is called the Destroyer of All Adversaries.”

    After that verse I almost cried…

    https://read.84000.co/translation/UT22084-046-001.html#node-2801

    Here’s another https://suttacentral.net/sn2.12/en/sujato?

    Standing to one side, the god Vishnu recited this verse in the Buddha’s presence:

    “Happy are the children of Manu who pay homage to the Holy One! They apply themselves to Gotama’s instructions, diligently training.”

    “Those who practice absorption in accord with the training”, said the Buddha to Vishnu, “in the way of teaching I’ve proclaimed, they’re in time to be diligent; they won’t fall under the sway of Death.”

    Lastly, but not leastly, great thanks to you Dmitry, you have a noble and great heart, Boddhisattva beings never say that they are Boddhisattvas, they even do not possess such a thought in their heartmind, if they would have such a thought, they would not be boddhisattvas, all views are under birth, decay and death, they change and their true nature is fleeting….

    MEA CULPA

    MEA CULPA

    MEA MAXIMA CULPA

    Quite interestingly and to me even shockingly Vishnu does not bow before Buddha, like it’s common with other devas in Buddhist texts…

    • Replies: @sher singh
    @EternalReturner1008

    So which Jewish schizo? AaronB or Laxa??

    Let's let Ron Unz sort it out..

    Replies: @Coconuts

    , @Bashibuzuk
    @EternalReturner1008

    What the heck ? I have never accessed anyone's data without their consent. In fact, I have never accessed anyone's personal information period. I don't even know how to do that. I have a hard time remembering my own passwords. And why would I do such a thing? What are you talking about? Does it mean that someone here on UR can steal other people's credentials to access other's data? It is quitte a problem.. I am out of here...

    Replies: @Barbarossa

    , @Bashibuzuk
    @EternalReturner1008

    To Ron Unz. This is very concerning and needs being investigated. I am being falsely accused of something that I have never done and frankly that I wouldn't have been capable of doing even if I wanted to. If the person writing above has been hacked into their computer through the use of this site then something is seriously wrong with the security of this forum. I request that this matter be investigated and handed in the serious manner ASAP. I also ask all my personal information be erased from this site.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk, @Mr. Hack, @Barbarossa

    , @Yahya
    @EternalReturner1008

    Never a dull moment around here.


    So Dont you think that it would be a good thing for you to self reflect?
     
    My money is on it being Laxa. The "self-reflect" gave it away.

    Replies: @Mikel

  786. @EternalReturner1008
    It seems that some time ago Bashi hacked my pc and stole everything on my hdd. To me personally it does not matter, but there was not just a scanned copy of my passport there but also personal information and documents of many other people that I have helped through my life in matters regarding immigration, getting job, visa or a refugee status in a EU country, including Ukrainian refugees. So I have made a notice to authorities and told my friends that their personal information has been stolen and they too should made such notice to authorities in their respective countries.

    But then maybe I can reveal a few things about you Bashi, like that you are not a Russian nationalist, nor even a Russian, oh how naively do Balts here believe in your BS, but well at least you have demonstrated in practice to me how such folks(as a collective) will never be anything else than pawns in the games of the others´.

    Oh and if you got angry because I made a comment about the meaning of circumcision in a Buddhist context then Btw you should check great Buddhist master, a true Pandita, and your former tribesman Berzin's list of major and minor marks of Buddha, where Berzin explains the karmic-causal reason for every body part of the Buddha, how fitting... It was through him that I learned the traditional Buddhist POV in regards of this matter. Maybe you should now dox and hack him, and then upload all his HDD to the internet?

    "His private organ is recessed and remains concealed. This comes from his having strictly kept his pledges of secrecy and having never revealed what was meant to be held confidentially."

    https://studybuddhism.com/en/advanced-studies/lam-rim/refuge/the-32-major-marks-of-a-buddha-s-physical-body

    Bashi it's one thing to harm oneself, like I have done, but to actively and pathologically to lie to others, constantly, to take something that is not yours, in other words to steal, and to claim spiritual understanding and achievements that one has not attained, these Bashi are heavy transgressions in the Dharma, a being that does such things casually has forsaken his intuitive capability to understand Dharma, at least during this current dream that we call our present LIFE. So deeply have you fallen into identity grasping that the rain of Dharma which extinguishes every fire and fever has transformed into an oil spill... If you Bashi think that I have done something bad through my words, then I should remind that you yourself have often here praised Russian Neo-Nazis, even claimed that Hitler would have been better than Stalin for the Russian people and so on and so on. Almost everything that you have written here about yourself has been lies, but almost everything that I have written here has been true, as you know through the contents of my HDD, only a few times I have lied through an omission, like not mentioning that I was very young when I visited the USSR, so young that I dont have memories of it.

    So Dont you think that it would be a good thing for you to self reflect? Even more pathetic is how you again and again write about the same things about the preservation of the bloodline and so on, are you in a doubt? A true believer has no need get affirmation for his beliefs in the internet. A religious person you are not, for an ill will and actively trying to do bad things to others comes to you naturally. Once again I repeat: there's a great difference between doing harm to oneself and actively doing harm to others. You spend too much time here on the internet hacking and spying people, its quite sad if this is how you get your pleasure. Therefore I say to you, get a LIFE Bashi, go outside.

    Still you seem to be agitated and I do not want to leave you in a such state, therefore Bashi I will offer to you victory, you have succeeded in shaming me, and in spying me through your trojans and rootkits, you have even sometimes made me to have an agitated state of mind! Therefore dear Bashi I offer to you victory, smarter you are, full of cunningness, and every day thinking of new ways of defending of ones own kin. For this all I offer to you the sweet nectar cup of Victory!

    And because of you I have finally understood some of the verses of noble Shantideva:

    10. For the sake of accomplishing the welfare of all sentient
    beings, I freely give up my body, enjoyments, and all my
    virtues of the three times.

    11. Surrendering everything is nirvana, and my mind seeks
    nirvana. If I must surrender everything, it is
    better that I give it to sentient beings.

    12. For the sake of all beings I have made this body pleasureless.
    Let them continually beat it, revile it, and cover it with filth.6

    13. Let them play with my body. Let them laugh at it and
    ridicule it. What does it matter to me? I have given my body
    to them.

    14. Let them have me perform deeds that are conducive to their
    happiness.8 Whoever resorts to me, may it never be in vain.

    15. For those who have resorted to me and have an angry or unkind thought, may even that always be the cause for their accomplishing every goal.

    16. May those who falsely accuse me, who harm me, and who
    ridicule me all partake of Awakening

    Also Bashi I have long understood why Desire is bad, but never why Aversion is one the poisons according to the Buddha, after all is it not natural for us to try to escape bad things or try to become free of them, but NO, to believe that anything, whatsoever possesses permanent negative characteristics is a lie, an illusion of the mind. Therefore even you are truly my teacher, how happily I would have been continuing my mindless blabbering here without you creating obstacles, without you creating pressure that led me to think truly and profoundly the problems of my life and in my mind. Truly Bashi you are my teacher in the particular sense as one great ancient master of my school Geshe Langri Thangpa describes in his Eight Verses For the Training the Mind.

    After all everyone of us does receive or take things in life, everyone does receive something, but one day we will need to give everything away, even the smallest figment of our imagination, but in the next life depending on the manner how we have received and how we have given away.....
    Those who have taken in unwholesome ways, will receive unwholesome things, those who have given humbly and freely, without struggle, will get everything easily, almost spontaneously!
    After all penultimate words of Buddha Shakyamuni were: "There's nothing of my own, that's why I am happy!"

    Our mind will one day ceace, all good and bad in it, it is an fact, but we can choose the manner how it will cease, do we struggle and degenerate, desperately trying to hold back as the corruption and degradation that comes with decay when ald age and time takes everything mercilessly away, or do we bravely give everything away, understanding that as things go away, they also do come back, but never as same!





    I have not forgotten your question Coconuts, here is a short explanation how Madhyamika system logics works, bit different from western nominalism. https://twitter.com/sambwinslow/status/1331716185784770560



    I have only now little time ago started to truly believe, before that my faith was only purely rational and passive, I did not I have genuine living faith, emotionally felt, truly there is no greater treasure, no greater fulfillement of every wish. During the last summer I finally met my true Guru, my true Lama and I have now taken refugee into Him, confessed all my sins, without forgetting even a smallest detail. How liberating!

    I will not return here, for I have no interest to get hacked again(ahem javascript attacks), but before I leave I must say to Sher Singh that I am very graceful to you that I have learned more about Sikhi Dharma, truly Shaivism, Vaishnavism, Jainism, Shaktism, Buddhism and Sikhism are just different manifestations of ONE ETERNAL TRUTH. For those who are saved by the God's grace there is the Vishnu, for those are saved by realising that their nature is same as the God's, there is the Shiva, and for those who believe that Man can attain the Godly state there is the Buddha... and so on....
    Together we are one living super organism, and Sikhi Dharma is same as Kshatriya Dharma, necessary prerequisite that there can one day be suitable conditions for Brahmacharya life, so that the holy life could exist and flourish!

    Btw my knowledge was lacking about Vishnu in regards of Buddhadharma

    Here is what is written in an extremely important Mahayana Sutra, Lalitavistarasutra, in which Buddha's life story as a man is told.

    “Because he is endowed with the great strength of Nārāyaṇa, he is called the Great Nārāyaṇa. Because he is endowed with power to tame many millions of demons, he is called the Destroyer of All Adversaries."

    After that verse I almost cried...

    https://read.84000.co/translation/UT22084-046-001.html#node-2801

    Here's another https://suttacentral.net/sn2.12/en/sujato?

    Standing to one side, the god Vishnu recited this verse in the Buddha’s presence:

    “Happy are the children of Manu who pay homage to the Holy One! They apply themselves to Gotama’s instructions, diligently training.”

    “Those who practice absorption in accord with the training”, said the Buddha to Vishnu, “in the way of teaching I’ve proclaimed, they’re in time to be diligent; they won’t fall under the sway of Death.”

    Lastly, but not leastly, great thanks to you Dmitry, you have a noble and great heart, Boddhisattva beings never say that they are Boddhisattvas, they even do not possess such a thought in their heartmind, if they would have such a thought, they would not be boddhisattvas, all views are under birth, decay and death, they change and their true nature is fleeting....

    MEA CULPA

    MEA CULPA

    MEA MAXIMA CULPA

    Quite interestingly and to me even shockingly Vishnu does not bow before Buddha, like it's common with other devas in Buddhist texts...

    Replies: @sher singh, @Bashibuzuk, @Bashibuzuk, @Yahya

    So which Jewish schizo? AaronB or Laxa??

    Let’s let Ron Unz sort it out..

    • Replies: @Coconuts
    @sher singh

    Was it Altanbashi? I remember we discussed a few things about underlying differences in Western and Buddhist philosophy before he left the forum.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

  787. Bashibuzuk says:
    @EternalReturner1008
    It seems that some time ago Bashi hacked my pc and stole everything on my hdd. To me personally it does not matter, but there was not just a scanned copy of my passport there but also personal information and documents of many other people that I have helped through my life in matters regarding immigration, getting job, visa or a refugee status in a EU country, including Ukrainian refugees. So I have made a notice to authorities and told my friends that their personal information has been stolen and they too should made such notice to authorities in their respective countries.

    But then maybe I can reveal a few things about you Bashi, like that you are not a Russian nationalist, nor even a Russian, oh how naively do Balts here believe in your BS, but well at least you have demonstrated in practice to me how such folks(as a collective) will never be anything else than pawns in the games of the others´.

    Oh and if you got angry because I made a comment about the meaning of circumcision in a Buddhist context then Btw you should check great Buddhist master, a true Pandita, and your former tribesman Berzin's list of major and minor marks of Buddha, where Berzin explains the karmic-causal reason for every body part of the Buddha, how fitting... It was through him that I learned the traditional Buddhist POV in regards of this matter. Maybe you should now dox and hack him, and then upload all his HDD to the internet?

    "His private organ is recessed and remains concealed. This comes from his having strictly kept his pledges of secrecy and having never revealed what was meant to be held confidentially."

    https://studybuddhism.com/en/advanced-studies/lam-rim/refuge/the-32-major-marks-of-a-buddha-s-physical-body

    Bashi it's one thing to harm oneself, like I have done, but to actively and pathologically to lie to others, constantly, to take something that is not yours, in other words to steal, and to claim spiritual understanding and achievements that one has not attained, these Bashi are heavy transgressions in the Dharma, a being that does such things casually has forsaken his intuitive capability to understand Dharma, at least during this current dream that we call our present LIFE. So deeply have you fallen into identity grasping that the rain of Dharma which extinguishes every fire and fever has transformed into an oil spill... If you Bashi think that I have done something bad through my words, then I should remind that you yourself have often here praised Russian Neo-Nazis, even claimed that Hitler would have been better than Stalin for the Russian people and so on and so on. Almost everything that you have written here about yourself has been lies, but almost everything that I have written here has been true, as you know through the contents of my HDD, only a few times I have lied through an omission, like not mentioning that I was very young when I visited the USSR, so young that I dont have memories of it.

    So Dont you think that it would be a good thing for you to self reflect? Even more pathetic is how you again and again write about the same things about the preservation of the bloodline and so on, are you in a doubt? A true believer has no need get affirmation for his beliefs in the internet. A religious person you are not, for an ill will and actively trying to do bad things to others comes to you naturally. Once again I repeat: there's a great difference between doing harm to oneself and actively doing harm to others. You spend too much time here on the internet hacking and spying people, its quite sad if this is how you get your pleasure. Therefore I say to you, get a LIFE Bashi, go outside.

    Still you seem to be agitated and I do not want to leave you in a such state, therefore Bashi I will offer to you victory, you have succeeded in shaming me, and in spying me through your trojans and rootkits, you have even sometimes made me to have an agitated state of mind! Therefore dear Bashi I offer to you victory, smarter you are, full of cunningness, and every day thinking of new ways of defending of ones own kin. For this all I offer to you the sweet nectar cup of Victory!

    And because of you I have finally understood some of the verses of noble Shantideva:

    10. For the sake of accomplishing the welfare of all sentient
    beings, I freely give up my body, enjoyments, and all my
    virtues of the three times.

    11. Surrendering everything is nirvana, and my mind seeks
    nirvana. If I must surrender everything, it is
    better that I give it to sentient beings.

    12. For the sake of all beings I have made this body pleasureless.
    Let them continually beat it, revile it, and cover it with filth.6

    13. Let them play with my body. Let them laugh at it and
    ridicule it. What does it matter to me? I have given my body
    to them.

    14. Let them have me perform deeds that are conducive to their
    happiness.8 Whoever resorts to me, may it never be in vain.

    15. For those who have resorted to me and have an angry or unkind thought, may even that always be the cause for their accomplishing every goal.

    16. May those who falsely accuse me, who harm me, and who
    ridicule me all partake of Awakening

    Also Bashi I have long understood why Desire is bad, but never why Aversion is one the poisons according to the Buddha, after all is it not natural for us to try to escape bad things or try to become free of them, but NO, to believe that anything, whatsoever possesses permanent negative characteristics is a lie, an illusion of the mind. Therefore even you are truly my teacher, how happily I would have been continuing my mindless blabbering here without you creating obstacles, without you creating pressure that led me to think truly and profoundly the problems of my life and in my mind. Truly Bashi you are my teacher in the particular sense as one great ancient master of my school Geshe Langri Thangpa describes in his Eight Verses For the Training the Mind.

    After all everyone of us does receive or take things in life, everyone does receive something, but one day we will need to give everything away, even the smallest figment of our imagination, but in the next life depending on the manner how we have received and how we have given away.....
    Those who have taken in unwholesome ways, will receive unwholesome things, those who have given humbly and freely, without struggle, will get everything easily, almost spontaneously!
    After all penultimate words of Buddha Shakyamuni were: "There's nothing of my own, that's why I am happy!"

    Our mind will one day ceace, all good and bad in it, it is an fact, but we can choose the manner how it will cease, do we struggle and degenerate, desperately trying to hold back as the corruption and degradation that comes with decay when ald age and time takes everything mercilessly away, or do we bravely give everything away, understanding that as things go away, they also do come back, but never as same!





    I have not forgotten your question Coconuts, here is a short explanation how Madhyamika system logics works, bit different from western nominalism. https://twitter.com/sambwinslow/status/1331716185784770560



    I have only now little time ago started to truly believe, before that my faith was only purely rational and passive, I did not I have genuine living faith, emotionally felt, truly there is no greater treasure, no greater fulfillement of every wish. During the last summer I finally met my true Guru, my true Lama and I have now taken refugee into Him, confessed all my sins, without forgetting even a smallest detail. How liberating!

    I will not return here, for I have no interest to get hacked again(ahem javascript attacks), but before I leave I must say to Sher Singh that I am very graceful to you that I have learned more about Sikhi Dharma, truly Shaivism, Vaishnavism, Jainism, Shaktism, Buddhism and Sikhism are just different manifestations of ONE ETERNAL TRUTH. For those who are saved by the God's grace there is the Vishnu, for those are saved by realising that their nature is same as the God's, there is the Shiva, and for those who believe that Man can attain the Godly state there is the Buddha... and so on....
    Together we are one living super organism, and Sikhi Dharma is same as Kshatriya Dharma, necessary prerequisite that there can one day be suitable conditions for Brahmacharya life, so that the holy life could exist and flourish!

    Btw my knowledge was lacking about Vishnu in regards of Buddhadharma

    Here is what is written in an extremely important Mahayana Sutra, Lalitavistarasutra, in which Buddha's life story as a man is told.

    “Because he is endowed with the great strength of Nārāyaṇa, he is called the Great Nārāyaṇa. Because he is endowed with power to tame many millions of demons, he is called the Destroyer of All Adversaries."

    After that verse I almost cried...

    https://read.84000.co/translation/UT22084-046-001.html#node-2801

    Here's another https://suttacentral.net/sn2.12/en/sujato?

    Standing to one side, the god Vishnu recited this verse in the Buddha’s presence:

    “Happy are the children of Manu who pay homage to the Holy One! They apply themselves to Gotama’s instructions, diligently training.”

    “Those who practice absorption in accord with the training”, said the Buddha to Vishnu, “in the way of teaching I’ve proclaimed, they’re in time to be diligent; they won’t fall under the sway of Death.”

    Lastly, but not leastly, great thanks to you Dmitry, you have a noble and great heart, Boddhisattva beings never say that they are Boddhisattvas, they even do not possess such a thought in their heartmind, if they would have such a thought, they would not be boddhisattvas, all views are under birth, decay and death, they change and their true nature is fleeting....

    MEA CULPA

    MEA CULPA

    MEA MAXIMA CULPA

    Quite interestingly and to me even shockingly Vishnu does not bow before Buddha, like it's common with other devas in Buddhist texts...

    Replies: @sher singh, @Bashibuzuk, @Bashibuzuk, @Yahya

    What the heck ? I have never accessed anyone’s data without their consent. In fact, I have never accessed anyone’s personal information period. I don’t even know how to do that. I have a hard time remembering my own passwords. And why would I do such a thing? What are you talking about? Does it mean that someone here on UR can steal other people’s credentials to access other’s data? It is quitte a problem.. I am out of here…

    • Replies: @Barbarossa
    @Bashibuzuk


    Does it mean that someone here on UR can steal other people’s credentials to access other’s data
     
    I don't see how anyone could do anything of the sort. The only personal info that is on here is an email, which isn't any help in hacking someone other than giving an address to phish. How would this person (if their computer we hacked) know that it was yourself or anyone else on this sited?

    It seems like maybe this is just a case of strange paranoia?
  788. @Dmitry
    @LatW

    In the ancient religions, they view the different gods, as aspects of each other. Different gods are mixed like the symbols of Ying and Yang.

    There is some later propaganda "pagans were worshipping different gods and pantheism was chaotic".

    But in Greece, for example, the pantheism was represented in the pantheon.

    The pantheon is the concept of the all in one. Difference is part of the same. Viewing the same from different perspective.

    Shiva is not without Vishnu. There is the nature of Apollo intermixing with Dionysus.

    For the people that read the Bible, they even know Satan is sometimes working to follow orders of God. Bible describes Satan working like God's employee. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Job%201&version=AMP Although in Medieval times, you could have been persecuted as Cathars for saying this and you would be hunted by the authorities as a heretic in the Pyrenees mountains. They were older parts of the Bible were writing in the Iron Age had perhaps seen this intermixing as the most obvious concept.

    Replies: @Dmitry, @Coconuts

    But in Greece, for example, the pantheism was represented in the pantheon.

    I may be wrong about this but I thought pantheism was the idea that the universe is made of God so its contents are all parts of God. I also thought this idea that all gods contain aspects of each other could be syncretism without becoming pantheism, afaik Neo-Platonists would believe that all the gods reflect the One, but they are emanations of it and definitely not parts of it.

    Although in Medieval times, you could have been persecuted as Cathars for saying this and you would be hunted by the authorities as a heretic in the Pyrenees mountains.

    Again, I thought Cathars were supposed to be strong dualists and believe that matter was evil, this would seem to be the opposite of pantheism and thinking that matter is a part of God.

    There seems to be a developing trend among historians of Catharism to suggest it was as much a creation of medieval Churchmen and inquisitors as an existing distinct belief system, similar to the creation process of witchcraft beliefs in the late 15th/early 16th C.

    • Replies: @silviosilver
    @Coconuts


    I may be wrong about this but I thought pantheism was the idea that the universe is made of God so its contents are all parts of God.
     
    I think you are right and Dmitry is using the term incorrectly, although the point he was trying to make may still have validity (ie even if "pantheism" is the wrong word for it).
    , @Dmitry
    @Coconuts


    I thought pantheism was the idea that the universe is made of God

     

    Yes sorry it was my mistake, I wrote the correction of words under the post.
    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-200/#comment-5641322 The word I was miswriting is "polytheism", not "pantheism". We have lack of edit function after 5 minutes unfortunately (which we should ask Unz about) so I had to add another post.

    Cathars were supposed to be strong dualists and believe that matter was evil
     
    If you look in those Iron Age text https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Job It's impossible to avoid that Satan (in this example of text) employee for God.

    Sure, middle ages Cathars might have believed many things (including Satan is the ruler of this planet), which are difficult to know today, as there are centuries when their beliefs are banned, after they have been murdered. Unfortunately, Catholic Church has murdered the Cathars and we can't talk to them.

    But my claim is not about Cathars specifically, but to write, there are aspects about the Gods in the ancient texts, which would have caused a lot of controversy in medieval times. For example, Satan is not viewed as distinct from God or working for a negative result in this example, which could be almost Cathar kind of controversy within the different epoch.


    celibates ends up enhancing the reproductive chances of their siblings and relations, similar to the ‘gay uncle effect’.
     
    Isn't this popular "evolutionary psychology" a pseudoscience for the popular magazines people read in the hair salon, that requires you to not read history, and not accept how people are motivated in real world? They are from the category of "Just-so story" as Utu wrote this here. In this example, its main assumption is already disproved by any knowledge of history i.e. popularity of anti-natalist religions of the ancient world.

    For example, Christians who have access to the Christian texts, are not celibate as an "evolutionary strategy to increase the reproductive chances of siblings". They are celibate usually because you only have one opportunity of life before the Judgement Day. They were God-fearing people and Judgement Day is scary for the sinner.

    Any person having children is to some extent in the New Testament is a voluntary additional sinner, as having children means you cannot control lust, according to Paul. New Testament says marriage is only acceptable if you cannot control lust, so having children are automatically is more near the position which implies your future will be eternity of hell. .

    Francis of Assisi is not exiting life of golden youth because he believes, this will impress women or help his nephew. He is exiting golden youths' life, because he has a religious conversion and views the luxury life, was not important compared to the religious life.

    Saint Marina is not trying to increase prestige for her family. More, the result is the opposite, which is one of the stress tests for her.

    I would agree there are some religious cults, created lies by the cult leader to scam for money and sex (e.g. Joseph Smith). So, you could explain Joseph Smith, by evolutionary psychology (except he was infertile). But the cult leader like Joseph Smith are only successful, because people really believe the lies and then subsequent motivation of the victims of the cult is related to the content of those lies, without motives for adding additional motivation.

    An example are Jehovah's Witnesses, who try to avoid having children because they believe only limited number of people can be saved in the apocalypse. You cannot explain with the "Just-so stories" from evolutionary psychology this anti-natalism of Jehovah Witnesses. Much more simply, they believe the religious content which has anti-natalism as logical implication.


    It seems particularly curious when white Europeans propagate anti-natalist doctrines among themselves, but not among non-white people living in the same country, and are simultaneously intent on growing their county’s population, this is strange wisdom and might be some kind of ideological artefact (if it is not evidence of harmful mutations)?

     

    One of the things is the pension system of developed welfare countries almost requires fertility rate is at least 2,1, if there was not immigration. But if fertility rate is below replacement, it becomes like a pyramid without the mass immigration.

    Accountancy and financial system of developed countries, was based from constant population growth, while the motivation of capitalism rewards expanding market size. Politicians of superpowers or great powers like America and Russia also have incentive for expanding population to pay for their armies.

    After the population boom from removal of Malthusian constraints in the industrial revolution, nowadays people in high income and middle income countries (and even low income countries like Bangladesh) are seeming to move to family planning which would improve the world if everyone follows them and immigration would end (both internal and external immigration).

    Even the third world countries have falling fertility rates and could converge with the developed countries, before they will become developed. For example, China and India expanded to the nightmare population size in the 20th century, but will begin falling in the second half of 21st century. China will fall to around 1 billion people by 2100, from 1,45 billion today.

    But this wouldn't create quiet uncrowded space in developed countries, as the motive for continued population increase would continue, and also the precondition to allow increase despite lowering fertility by the mechanism of immigration and easy transport.

    Today, countries with the lowest fertility rates in the world like Poland, Bulgaria and (soon) Ukraine, are sending mass immigration to Western Europe, because of income difference. If Russia (in Russia slavic fertility rates are lower than Japanese fertility rates) has open borders with Western Europe, most of the young population would emigrate as soon as they can and there would be increasing overpopulation of the UK.

    Mexico is gong to below replacement fertility, but there are still perhaps more than a hundred million people in Mexico who would like to live in America and the incentives in America could reply on the expanding population.

  789. Bashibuzuk says:
    @EternalReturner1008
    It seems that some time ago Bashi hacked my pc and stole everything on my hdd. To me personally it does not matter, but there was not just a scanned copy of my passport there but also personal information and documents of many other people that I have helped through my life in matters regarding immigration, getting job, visa or a refugee status in a EU country, including Ukrainian refugees. So I have made a notice to authorities and told my friends that their personal information has been stolen and they too should made such notice to authorities in their respective countries.

    But then maybe I can reveal a few things about you Bashi, like that you are not a Russian nationalist, nor even a Russian, oh how naively do Balts here believe in your BS, but well at least you have demonstrated in practice to me how such folks(as a collective) will never be anything else than pawns in the games of the others´.

    Oh and if you got angry because I made a comment about the meaning of circumcision in a Buddhist context then Btw you should check great Buddhist master, a true Pandita, and your former tribesman Berzin's list of major and minor marks of Buddha, where Berzin explains the karmic-causal reason for every body part of the Buddha, how fitting... It was through him that I learned the traditional Buddhist POV in regards of this matter. Maybe you should now dox and hack him, and then upload all his HDD to the internet?

    "His private organ is recessed and remains concealed. This comes from his having strictly kept his pledges of secrecy and having never revealed what was meant to be held confidentially."

    https://studybuddhism.com/en/advanced-studies/lam-rim/refuge/the-32-major-marks-of-a-buddha-s-physical-body

    Bashi it's one thing to harm oneself, like I have done, but to actively and pathologically to lie to others, constantly, to take something that is not yours, in other words to steal, and to claim spiritual understanding and achievements that one has not attained, these Bashi are heavy transgressions in the Dharma, a being that does such things casually has forsaken his intuitive capability to understand Dharma, at least during this current dream that we call our present LIFE. So deeply have you fallen into identity grasping that the rain of Dharma which extinguishes every fire and fever has transformed into an oil spill... If you Bashi think that I have done something bad through my words, then I should remind that you yourself have often here praised Russian Neo-Nazis, even claimed that Hitler would have been better than Stalin for the Russian people and so on and so on. Almost everything that you have written here about yourself has been lies, but almost everything that I have written here has been true, as you know through the contents of my HDD, only a few times I have lied through an omission, like not mentioning that I was very young when I visited the USSR, so young that I dont have memories of it.

    So Dont you think that it would be a good thing for you to self reflect? Even more pathetic is how you again and again write about the same things about the preservation of the bloodline and so on, are you in a doubt? A true believer has no need get affirmation for his beliefs in the internet. A religious person you are not, for an ill will and actively trying to do bad things to others comes to you naturally. Once again I repeat: there's a great difference between doing harm to oneself and actively doing harm to others. You spend too much time here on the internet hacking and spying people, its quite sad if this is how you get your pleasure. Therefore I say to you, get a LIFE Bashi, go outside.

    Still you seem to be agitated and I do not want to leave you in a such state, therefore Bashi I will offer to you victory, you have succeeded in shaming me, and in spying me through your trojans and rootkits, you have even sometimes made me to have an agitated state of mind! Therefore dear Bashi I offer to you victory, smarter you are, full of cunningness, and every day thinking of new ways of defending of ones own kin. For this all I offer to you the sweet nectar cup of Victory!

    And because of you I have finally understood some of the verses of noble Shantideva:

    10. For the sake of accomplishing the welfare of all sentient
    beings, I freely give up my body, enjoyments, and all my
    virtues of the three times.

    11. Surrendering everything is nirvana, and my mind seeks
    nirvana. If I must surrender everything, it is
    better that I give it to sentient beings.

    12. For the sake of all beings I have made this body pleasureless.
    Let them continually beat it, revile it, and cover it with filth.6

    13. Let them play with my body. Let them laugh at it and
    ridicule it. What does it matter to me? I have given my body
    to them.

    14. Let them have me perform deeds that are conducive to their
    happiness.8 Whoever resorts to me, may it never be in vain.

    15. For those who have resorted to me and have an angry or unkind thought, may even that always be the cause for their accomplishing every goal.

    16. May those who falsely accuse me, who harm me, and who
    ridicule me all partake of Awakening

    Also Bashi I have long understood why Desire is bad, but never why Aversion is one the poisons according to the Buddha, after all is it not natural for us to try to escape bad things or try to become free of them, but NO, to believe that anything, whatsoever possesses permanent negative characteristics is a lie, an illusion of the mind. Therefore even you are truly my teacher, how happily I would have been continuing my mindless blabbering here without you creating obstacles, without you creating pressure that led me to think truly and profoundly the problems of my life and in my mind. Truly Bashi you are my teacher in the particular sense as one great ancient master of my school Geshe Langri Thangpa describes in his Eight Verses For the Training the Mind.

    After all everyone of us does receive or take things in life, everyone does receive something, but one day we will need to give everything away, even the smallest figment of our imagination, but in the next life depending on the manner how we have received and how we have given away.....
    Those who have taken in unwholesome ways, will receive unwholesome things, those who have given humbly and freely, without struggle, will get everything easily, almost spontaneously!
    After all penultimate words of Buddha Shakyamuni were: "There's nothing of my own, that's why I am happy!"

    Our mind will one day ceace, all good and bad in it, it is an fact, but we can choose the manner how it will cease, do we struggle and degenerate, desperately trying to hold back as the corruption and degradation that comes with decay when ald age and time takes everything mercilessly away, or do we bravely give everything away, understanding that as things go away, they also do come back, but never as same!





    I have not forgotten your question Coconuts, here is a short explanation how Madhyamika system logics works, bit different from western nominalism. https://twitter.com/sambwinslow/status/1331716185784770560



    I have only now little time ago started to truly believe, before that my faith was only purely rational and passive, I did not I have genuine living faith, emotionally felt, truly there is no greater treasure, no greater fulfillement of every wish. During the last summer I finally met my true Guru, my true Lama and I have now taken refugee into Him, confessed all my sins, without forgetting even a smallest detail. How liberating!

    I will not return here, for I have no interest to get hacked again(ahem javascript attacks), but before I leave I must say to Sher Singh that I am very graceful to you that I have learned more about Sikhi Dharma, truly Shaivism, Vaishnavism, Jainism, Shaktism, Buddhism and Sikhism are just different manifestations of ONE ETERNAL TRUTH. For those who are saved by the God's grace there is the Vishnu, for those are saved by realising that their nature is same as the God's, there is the Shiva, and for those who believe that Man can attain the Godly state there is the Buddha... and so on....
    Together we are one living super organism, and Sikhi Dharma is same as Kshatriya Dharma, necessary prerequisite that there can one day be suitable conditions for Brahmacharya life, so that the holy life could exist and flourish!

    Btw my knowledge was lacking about Vishnu in regards of Buddhadharma

    Here is what is written in an extremely important Mahayana Sutra, Lalitavistarasutra, in which Buddha's life story as a man is told.

    “Because he is endowed with the great strength of Nārāyaṇa, he is called the Great Nārāyaṇa. Because he is endowed with power to tame many millions of demons, he is called the Destroyer of All Adversaries."

    After that verse I almost cried...

    https://read.84000.co/translation/UT22084-046-001.html#node-2801

    Here's another https://suttacentral.net/sn2.12/en/sujato?

    Standing to one side, the god Vishnu recited this verse in the Buddha’s presence:

    “Happy are the children of Manu who pay homage to the Holy One! They apply themselves to Gotama’s instructions, diligently training.”

    “Those who practice absorption in accord with the training”, said the Buddha to Vishnu, “in the way of teaching I’ve proclaimed, they’re in time to be diligent; they won’t fall under the sway of Death.”

    Lastly, but not leastly, great thanks to you Dmitry, you have a noble and great heart, Boddhisattva beings never say that they are Boddhisattvas, they even do not possess such a thought in their heartmind, if they would have such a thought, they would not be boddhisattvas, all views are under birth, decay and death, they change and their true nature is fleeting....

    MEA CULPA

    MEA CULPA

    MEA MAXIMA CULPA

    Quite interestingly and to me even shockingly Vishnu does not bow before Buddha, like it's common with other devas in Buddhist texts...

    Replies: @sher singh, @Bashibuzuk, @Bashibuzuk, @Yahya

    To Ron Unz. This is very concerning and needs being investigated. I am being falsely accused of something that I have never done and frankly that I wouldn’t have been capable of doing even if I wanted to. If the person writing above has been hacked into their computer through the use of this site then something is seriously wrong with the security of this forum. I request that this matter be investigated and handed in the serious manner ASAP. I also ask all my personal information be erased from this site.

    • Agree: Mr. Hack
    • Replies: @Bashibuzuk
    @Bashibuzuk

    To everyone on UR who read my posts and discussed with me. Thanks! What has just happened leaves me no other choice but to leave this forum for good. If the person writing above is right about someone hacking into their computer through the use of this site, then we should all be extra careful.

    AND NO I HAVE NOT HACKED IN ANYONE'S COMPUTER. I AM NOT A HACKER AND I DON'T KNOW WHY THE PERSON ABOVE ACCUSES ME AND WRITES SUCH TERRIBLE THINGS. FAREWELL EVERYONE.

    Replies: @silviosilver, @S, @LatW, @Dmitry

    , @Mr. Hack
    @Bashibuzuk

    I was thinking about you recently, how much I appreciate our conversations here, and what an honest and good guy you are. My #1 favorite Russian guy at this blog. This guy EternalReturner#1008sounds a bit delusional, I wouldn't get to strung out over him, and I do agree with you that Ron Unz needs to investigate this guy's claims and reassure all of us here that no serious hacking or breach of personal information is going on here. I hope that you don't disappear over this incident for too long.

    Ron, please do clarify with your readership here, just what's going on. Thanks!

    , @Barbarossa
    @Bashibuzuk

    I was just going to post the issue to the "Bugs and Suggestions" thread where Ron will be more likely to see it, but German Reader graciously beat me to the punch.

    I would recommend sitting tight for a bit before you bail and seeing what happens. We can't be getting excited over every wanker talking crap on the internet, after all. My bet is that it's a bunch of steaming BS.

    I, like Yahya and Sher Singh wouldn't be surprised if it was Laxa, who might be trying to undermine the thread after being barred permanently from it. She is the mistress of sock puppets after all...

    I think we'd all hate to lose you around here.

    Replies: @LatW

  790. @sher singh
    @EternalReturner1008

    So which Jewish schizo? AaronB or Laxa??

    Let's let Ron Unz sort it out..

    Replies: @Coconuts

    Was it Altanbashi? I remember we discussed a few things about underlying differences in Western and Buddhist philosophy before he left the forum.

    • Replies: @Bashibuzuk
    @Coconuts

    I do think it is Altan. But I swear on my kids and my parents lives that I have not hacked into his computer. Why would anyone do such a thing, Altan was mainly just discussing Buddhism. I have not hacked into your computer Altan , I have greatly enjoyed our discussions and I wish you no harm. I swear it. If someone hacked into your computer and stole your data then it is very sad. But it has nothing to do with me. I have no idea why you would accuse me. What the hell is going on here ?

    Replies: @sudden death

  791. Bashibuzuk says:
    @Bashibuzuk
    @EternalReturner1008

    To Ron Unz. This is very concerning and needs being investigated. I am being falsely accused of something that I have never done and frankly that I wouldn't have been capable of doing even if I wanted to. If the person writing above has been hacked into their computer through the use of this site then something is seriously wrong with the security of this forum. I request that this matter be investigated and handed in the serious manner ASAP. I also ask all my personal information be erased from this site.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk, @Mr. Hack, @Barbarossa

    To everyone on UR who read my posts and discussed with me. Thanks! What has just happened leaves me no other choice but to leave this forum for good. If the person writing above is right about someone hacking into their computer through the use of this site, then we should all be extra careful.

    AND NO I HAVE NOT HACKED IN ANYONE’S COMPUTER. I AM NOT A HACKER AND I DON’T KNOW WHY THE PERSON ABOVE ACCUSES ME AND WRITES SUCH TERRIBLE THINGS. FAREWELL EVERYONE.

    • Replies: @silviosilver
    @Bashibuzuk


    What has just happened leaves me no other choice but to leave this forum for good.
     
    How many of these swan song posts have there been so far?

    Dramatically announcing your departure again and again makes you sound a bit unstable.

    PS- stop hacking my hdd, you bastard.

    : )

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard

    , @S
    @Bashibuzuk

    Hope you stick around, Bashibuzuk.

    Don't let them run you off. That's what they want you to do. I'm sure I speak for many others here when I say that.

    My suspicion is your 'crime' may have simply been to say something another person didn't like, or to excite a jealousy of some sort in them. Easy to do on the internet as you know. Some of the language style of your accuser is remindful of the exiled Laxa entity, though they didn't write so much about the Buddha, to be sure. Perhaps it is Altan as some have suggested.

    Maybe R Unz can shed some light on what's going on with this person and can clear things up.

    , @LatW
    @Bashibuzuk

    NO, PLEASE, NO...

    I don't believe anything they said. It sounds like someone who is jealous.

    This is the lamest thing ever. Please, no... :(((

    , @Dmitry
    @Bashibuzuk

    Lol you don't need to be easily trolled. Altan and you have been disagreeing about Buddhism. Most everyone here can agree with Altan many of your views are not consistent with Buddhism.

    But forum is a social space, where our comments are not representation of our views, but often related to the reaction we want from another user, just comments on comments. I know I am mostly posting to the discussion in the forum as "devil's advocate" and often not representing my views clearly.

    In same way, I don't think you "support Hitler". If I remember, there was social pressure in this forum for you to show you are a "real nationalist", because of this context where the Middle Eastern blogger is writing "nationalism is supporting Putin".

    For example, I wrote many times in past years in the forum about Ukraine with rude tone, which looks unpleasant after February 24. That is because of falling to a dialogue with crazy views of the user AP. Half my posts will look stupid like that, but perhaps the overall discussion they create was interesting.

    Two years ago, we were both writing in the racist snobby way about Armenians and Azerbaijanis, when they entered a war which doesn't have boiling of heads. Retrospectively, our comments look like dark comedy before the abyss, when Armenia-Azerbaijan is just a little hors d'oeuvre for Russia-Ukraine. It's because at the time we want to add distance from them, which creates nervous forum writings like that. But in the real thoughts and instincts of the time, the motivation was the fear Armenia-Azerbaijan is a mirror and they are not distant, but ugly they looked they were relatively a rosy mirror.

    Replies: @LatW

  792. Bashibuzuk says:
    @Coconuts
    @sher singh

    Was it Altanbashi? I remember we discussed a few things about underlying differences in Western and Buddhist philosophy before he left the forum.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk

    I do think it is Altan. But I swear on my kids and my parents lives that I have not hacked into his computer. Why would anyone do such a thing, Altan was mainly just discussing Buddhism. I have not hacked into your computer Altan , I have greatly enjoyed our discussions and I wish you no harm. I swear it. If someone hacked into your computer and stole your data then it is very sad. But it has nothing to do with me. I have no idea why you would accuse me. What the hell is going on here ?

    • Replies: @sudden death
    @Bashibuzuk

    https://miro.medium.com/max/640/0*Wv5rHUzi5-61HcCw.jpg

    Sorry, but couldn't help it - one rambling anon accussing others of helping aliens to abduct him at night might be just as believable when written on the net, lol

  793. @Bashibuzuk
    @Coconuts

    I do think it is Altan. But I swear on my kids and my parents lives that I have not hacked into his computer. Why would anyone do such a thing, Altan was mainly just discussing Buddhism. I have not hacked into your computer Altan , I have greatly enjoyed our discussions and I wish you no harm. I swear it. If someone hacked into your computer and stole your data then it is very sad. But it has nothing to do with me. I have no idea why you would accuse me. What the hell is going on here ?

    Replies: @sudden death


    Sorry, but couldn’t help it – one rambling anon accussing others of helping aliens to abduct him at night might be just as believable when written on the net, lol

    • Agree: Mr. Hack, Barbarossa
  794. @Thulean Friend
    Probably one of the better takes on the Kanye situation.

    https://mobile.twitter.com/qin_duke/status/1588534604658376706

    The ADL openly bragging about leading a "advertiser boycott" of Twitter in order to pressure Elon to do its bidding should dispense with the fantasy that the West is a "free-market system". It's just as controlled as China. The difference is that in China you know who's in charge. In the West you get in trouble for just asking the question.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @songbird

    Kanye West is so stinking rich he bangs Kardashians.

    Sympathy for such an individual is an indication you need to get a life. If you or I had 1/20th of his dough we could be living in a nice house in a nice neighborhood minding our own business and not one single human on the planet need give two cents regarding anything about either of us for perpetuity.

    • Agree: Barbarossa
    • Replies: @Thulean Friend
    @Emil Nikola Richard

    Imagine being so stupid that you think this about Kanye's personal life rather what it says about power in America.

    Lol, I should start to treat this blog as only a form of entertainment given the stupidity on display here.

  795. @Thulean Friend
    Probably one of the better takes on the Kanye situation.

    https://mobile.twitter.com/qin_duke/status/1588534604658376706

    The ADL openly bragging about leading a "advertiser boycott" of Twitter in order to pressure Elon to do its bidding should dispense with the fantasy that the West is a "free-market system". It's just as controlled as China. The difference is that in China you know who's in charge. In the West you get in trouble for just asking the question.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @songbird

    What I think is remarkable about the story is that Musk appears to be something of an autist, and yet, he was still amazingly circumspect going into this. Saying that he was not the one to make the decision to let Kanye back, and willingly meeting with these different groups, which I am sure is not enjoyable.

    • Replies: @Dmitry
    @songbird

    What is the current business model of Twitter?

    It has valuation of billions of dollars, mainly because it used by celebrities and politicians. The ordinary people go to the website because to read the celebrities and politicians. And advertisers sell to the ordinary people who come to watch celebrities.

    It's like a fashionable nightclub for celebrities and politicians that is on stage above ordinary people. And revenue is from advertising to the people below while they watching hypnotized by the celebrities and politicians.

    Goose that lays the Golden Eggs for Twitter, are the celebrities and politicians. It's not like Facebook with useful data.

    So, Musk has bought website version of a fashionable nightclub.

    Normally, you would say, the most important plan for Twitter, is that the experience there will be pleasant for the celebrities and politicians and the advertisers who use them. This the Goose you don't want to kill.

    Although perhaps he has enough money and madness that he might want to change its business model. Although social media is not the most romantic industry. Surely, it would have been more romantic for him if he bought a real nightclub or restaurant.

  796. @Bashibuzuk
    @EternalReturner1008

    To Ron Unz. This is very concerning and needs being investigated. I am being falsely accused of something that I have never done and frankly that I wouldn't have been capable of doing even if I wanted to. If the person writing above has been hacked into their computer through the use of this site then something is seriously wrong with the security of this forum. I request that this matter be investigated and handed in the serious manner ASAP. I also ask all my personal information be erased from this site.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk, @Mr. Hack, @Barbarossa

    I was thinking about you recently, how much I appreciate our conversations here, and what an honest and good guy you are. My #1 favorite Russian guy at this blog. This guy EternalReturner#1008sounds a bit delusional, I wouldn’t get to strung out over him, and I do agree with you that Ron Unz needs to investigate this guy’s claims and reassure all of us here that no serious hacking or breach of personal information is going on here. I hope that you don’t disappear over this incident for too long.

    Ron, please do clarify with your readership here, just what’s going on. Thanks!

  797. @Coconuts
    @Dmitry


    But in Greece, for example, the pantheism was represented in the pantheon.
     
    I may be wrong about this but I thought pantheism was the idea that the universe is made of God so its contents are all parts of God. I also thought this idea that all gods contain aspects of each other could be syncretism without becoming pantheism, afaik Neo-Platonists would believe that all the gods reflect the One, but they are emanations of it and definitely not parts of it.

    Although in Medieval times, you could have been persecuted as Cathars for saying this and you would be hunted by the authorities as a heretic in the Pyrenees mountains.
     
    Again, I thought Cathars were supposed to be strong dualists and believe that matter was evil, this would seem to be the opposite of pantheism and thinking that matter is a part of God.

    There seems to be a developing trend among historians of Catharism to suggest it was as much a creation of medieval Churchmen and inquisitors as an existing distinct belief system, similar to the creation process of witchcraft beliefs in the late 15th/early 16th C.

    Replies: @silviosilver, @Dmitry

    I may be wrong about this but I thought pantheism was the idea that the universe is made of God so its contents are all parts of God.

    I think you are right and Dmitry is using the term incorrectly, although the point he was trying to make may still have validity (ie even if “pantheism” is the wrong word for it).

  798. @Bashibuzuk
    @Bashibuzuk

    To everyone on UR who read my posts and discussed with me. Thanks! What has just happened leaves me no other choice but to leave this forum for good. If the person writing above is right about someone hacking into their computer through the use of this site, then we should all be extra careful.

    AND NO I HAVE NOT HACKED IN ANYONE'S COMPUTER. I AM NOT A HACKER AND I DON'T KNOW WHY THE PERSON ABOVE ACCUSES ME AND WRITES SUCH TERRIBLE THINGS. FAREWELL EVERYONE.

    Replies: @silviosilver, @S, @LatW, @Dmitry

    What has just happened leaves me no other choice but to leave this forum for good.

    How many of these swan song posts have there been so far?

    Dramatically announcing your departure again and again makes you sound a bit unstable.

    PS- stop hacking my hdd, you bastard.

    : )

    • Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
    @silviosilver

    There is a really great psychotherapy book by an awesome psychiatrist.

    https://www.goodreads.com/en/book/show/402220.Gestalt_Therapy

    One of the odds and ends in there is Naranjo opines that Buddhism is a fantastic mode of psychotherapy albeit rather useless as a world view for the real world. (His preferred denomination is Zen and he has extensive quotations from Alan Watts. (cough))

  799. @Wokechoke
    @QCIC

    what's the point of Kharkov if it isn't a border town trading with Belgorod?

    Replies: @QCIC

    Good question. Kharkov was a major center for science and technology developed by the Soviets.

    Who knows what the future holds?

  800. @silviosilver
    @Bashibuzuk


    What has just happened leaves me no other choice but to leave this forum for good.
     
    How many of these swan song posts have there been so far?

    Dramatically announcing your departure again and again makes you sound a bit unstable.

    PS- stop hacking my hdd, you bastard.

    : )

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard

    There is a really great psychotherapy book by an awesome psychiatrist.

    https://www.goodreads.com/en/book/show/402220.Gestalt_Therapy

    One of the odds and ends in there is Naranjo opines that Buddhism is a fantastic mode of psychotherapy albeit rather useless as a world view for the real world. (His preferred denomination is Zen and he has extensive quotations from Alan Watts. (cough))

  801. @Bashibuzuk
    @Bashibuzuk

    To everyone on UR who read my posts and discussed with me. Thanks! What has just happened leaves me no other choice but to leave this forum for good. If the person writing above is right about someone hacking into their computer through the use of this site, then we should all be extra careful.

    AND NO I HAVE NOT HACKED IN ANYONE'S COMPUTER. I AM NOT A HACKER AND I DON'T KNOW WHY THE PERSON ABOVE ACCUSES ME AND WRITES SUCH TERRIBLE THINGS. FAREWELL EVERYONE.

    Replies: @silviosilver, @S, @LatW, @Dmitry

    Hope you stick around, Bashibuzuk.

    Don’t let them run you off. That’s what they want you to do. I’m sure I speak for many others here when I say that.

    My suspicion is your ‘crime’ may have simply been to say something another person didn’t like, or to excite a jealousy of some sort in them. Easy to do on the internet as you know. Some of the language style of your accuser is remindful of the exiled Laxa entity, though they didn’t write so much about the Buddha, to be sure. Perhaps it is Altan as some have suggested.

    Maybe R Unz can shed some light on what’s going on with this person and can clear things up.

  802. @Bashibuzuk
    @Bashibuzuk

    To everyone on UR who read my posts and discussed with me. Thanks! What has just happened leaves me no other choice but to leave this forum for good. If the person writing above is right about someone hacking into their computer through the use of this site, then we should all be extra careful.

    AND NO I HAVE NOT HACKED IN ANYONE'S COMPUTER. I AM NOT A HACKER AND I DON'T KNOW WHY THE PERSON ABOVE ACCUSES ME AND WRITES SUCH TERRIBLE THINGS. FAREWELL EVERYONE.

    Replies: @silviosilver, @S, @LatW, @Dmitry

    NO, PLEASE, NO…

    I don’t believe anything they said. It sounds like someone who is jealous.

    This is the lamest thing ever. Please, no… :(((

  803. @Dmitry
    @Bashibuzuk


    Svyatovit (Svantevit) temple

     

    The god with four direction which can be related to the same theme as Brahma.

    grow and multiply because they are still well aligned with their ancestral
     
    In a few years, people have grown and multiply thousand times more than the normal number in the majority of species history.

    https://i.imgur.com/CYQGXNP.png

    This is the combination with technology (the cause of the vast population boom) surely a main cause of our psychological disillusioning of the last few centuries.

    With this population overgrowth, you would assume more like species wisdom to reduce the birthrate will be naturally, or there would be something like nuclear war unnaturally to reduce the overgrowth.

    You would assume more spiritual people connected to the species wisdom, would be reducing birthrate naturally, as continued population growth could only result in an unnatural disaster to reduce the overgrowth like nuclear wars. .

    If bacteria will have overgrowth like this in the close laboratory jar, it would change external conditions to destroy the whole group of bacteria.

    In human psychology terms, it's not very romantic, when land has been converted to car parking and logistics warehouses.

    You can say the problem with the particular type of industrial culture (that you dislike Amazon or capitalism or communism), but it's more for all of the human history until the last few minutes, we were always surrounded with nonpopulated, nonagriculture, nonhuman spaces with the undamaged forests, living in societies with a few dozen people.


    Arabs, Jews, most Black people and Hindustani people grow and multiply because they are still well aligned with their ancestral beliefs. To kill a people, first one needs to kill their gods.

     

    I don't think today birthrates correlated negatively with the level of spiritual destruction of the community or the tribe.

    For example, Tuvans have one of the highest birthrate in Russia. Of course, not officially written, but you can infer from regional variation in Russia. https://rg.ru/2020/09/09/reg-skfo/nazvany-regiony-s-samoj-vysokoj-rozhdaemostiu-i-smertnostiu.html

    Every community in Russia and all the postsoviet space is relatively spiritually broken. But Tuvans have been really a spiritually broken and destroyed community, perhaps the most spiritually broken nationality in the region.

    Similarly, especially before abortion was promoted, African Americans have until recently always a higher birthrate than average Americans. But the African Americans have been one of the groups most broken by the modernity, with their gods and spirituality surviving only by translation to the culture of their European slave owners.

    You know, the classic symptoms of being spiritually broken people, like the Native Americans and Tuvans - you can only see alcohol shops in some of the ghettos. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cGuDPcjaVo0.

    -


    As for Haredi Jews, like Amish, they have a highbirth rate, in our current context mainly because they are in a cult living in a developed countries, which bans birthcontrol. So, birthrate correlates with religious conformism in this recent context.

    But before recent invention of birthcontrol (and in third world countries today), historically, people have children as the inevitable result of lust. You cannot follow lust, without resulting children.

    Having children is the inevitable result of lust and also evidence of lust. Therefore, there were anti-natalist religions like Christianity in New Testament and first millennium, as having children is a sign of lust which is viewed negatively, and which for Paul can only be a second best option.

    In Christianity, the more spiritual people, would historically become celibate, like most saints in the last couple millennium, most clergy, monks, nuns, which is said as the best option directly by Paul. Excluding not just some extreme people like Origen, level of your spirituality or religious conformism would negatively correlate with the number of your children and they constructed monasteries all around Europe that allow the childless, semi-nonworking people to have the sometimes utopian community. And of course, in Buddhism the similar tradition.

    It's because Christianity has viewed lust as negative and having children is a compromise only for someone who cannot control their lust (as Paul writes directly).

    Replies: @Coconuts

    You would assume more spiritual people connected to the species wisdom, would be reducing birthrate naturally, as continued population growth could only result in an unnatural disaster to reduce the overgrowth like nuclear wars.

    This is an interesting topic with many aspects; humans are often described as selfish cooperators, in that they are both self-interested and altruistic at the same time. The evolutionary aspect of large numbers of people willingly sacrificing the future of their own genes for the sake of some surviving minority might seem counter intuitive. (Outside of the ‘spiteful mutant’ hypothesis I guess).

    Following David Sloane Wilson, iirc Christianity ends up being pro-natalist like the other Abrahamic faiths (I think even in the time of the declining Roman Empire, following the ‘Christian sexual revolution’). The minority of celibates ends up enhancing the reproductive chances of their siblings and relations, similar to the ‘gay uncle effect’.

    It seems particularly curious when white Europeans propagate anti-natalist doctrines among themselves, but not among non-white people living in the same country, and are simultaneously intent on growing their county’s population, this is strange wisdom and might be some kind of ideological artefact (if it is not evidence of harmful mutations)?

  804. What to make of this new report that half of Yalies want the death penalty for “hate speech?”

  805. It is hard for beggars to run wars when they do not receive handouts. (1)

    More than 1,000 Starlink satellite internet terminals for Ukraine’s military to boost communication channels on the modern battlefield went dark, reported CNN, citing two sources familiar with the outage. This report comes even though Elon Musk has pledged to continue funding Starlink operations in the war-torn country.

    The outage has affected 1,300 Starlink terminals that Ukraine purchased from a British company earlier this year and used in combat-related operations. Each terminal costs $2,500 per month, with the batch costing $3.25 million per month.

    Before the terminals went offline, Ukraine’s Ministry of Defense requested their British counterparts pick up the monthly bill several weeks ago, which amassed to a whopping $20 million since the 1,300 terminals were deployed in March.

    How long will it take for Kiev regime aggression to collapse when the money runs out next year?

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/ukraine-starlink-terminals-go-dark-over-funding-issues

    • Replies: @sudden death
    @A123


    It is hard for beggars to run wars when they do not receive handouts.
     
    By this logic you just have nicely admitted that in inflation adjusted terms Israel has been the biggest continuous handout starving beggar ever in all of US history;)

    Replies: @A123

  806. @Mikel
    @Barbarossa


    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urnes_Stave_Church
     
    Thanks for that link!

    Apparently, a good part of the wood has been replaced over the centuries but there are still plenty of structural elements standing since medieval times. Perhaps what makes it even more amazing is that this church is located in a very humid part of Scandinavia, next to a fjord and not far from the ocean.

    I wonder what kind of wood they used. In the Basque Country you find centuries old oak beams and posts in old buildings but I don't think there's much hardwood available in the Norwegian fjord area.

    Replies: @Barbarossa, @Philip Owen

    It’s mostly all Pine and Spruce up there. I don’t believe that any hardwood would have been used except perhaps for small structural things like pegs.

    Old growth pine can be really durable and rot resistant; quite unlike most second growth pine you see today which is very fast growing and mostly sapwood. I’m sure the carving would have been pine since spruce would be an absolute misery to carve. Tight grained pine is very nice though.

    a good part of the wood has been replaced over the centuries

    This made me think of the human body; how our cells are replaced while we remain constant. It’s rather a nice thought that a building would be repaired over centuries rather than just razed and “updated” at the first sign of decay.

    • Replies: @Mikel
    @Barbarossa

    I agree. It must be coniferous wood. That's what people use where it's abundant, like here in the West. Conifers also give very long straight trunks to cut good boards from.

    In more temperate climates like the Atlantic facade where I was born, hardwood is more abundant and has a very long tradition of being used not just in construction but for shipbuilding too. Transoceanic ships used to be built with beech trees from forests close to where I was born. Once properly tarred, they would last for many decades.

    Do people build with hardwood on the East Coast or do they also prefer conifers? I think you have plenty of hardwood in your forests.

    Replies: @Barbarossa

  807. @Bashibuzuk
    @EternalReturner1008

    What the heck ? I have never accessed anyone's data without their consent. In fact, I have never accessed anyone's personal information period. I don't even know how to do that. I have a hard time remembering my own passwords. And why would I do such a thing? What are you talking about? Does it mean that someone here on UR can steal other people's credentials to access other's data? It is quitte a problem.. I am out of here...

    Replies: @Barbarossa

    Does it mean that someone here on UR can steal other people’s credentials to access other’s data

    I don’t see how anyone could do anything of the sort. The only personal info that is on here is an email, which isn’t any help in hacking someone other than giving an address to phish. How would this person (if their computer we hacked) know that it was yourself or anyone else on this sited?

    It seems like maybe this is just a case of strange paranoia?

  808. @EternalReturner1008
    It seems that some time ago Bashi hacked my pc and stole everything on my hdd. To me personally it does not matter, but there was not just a scanned copy of my passport there but also personal information and documents of many other people that I have helped through my life in matters regarding immigration, getting job, visa or a refugee status in a EU country, including Ukrainian refugees. So I have made a notice to authorities and told my friends that their personal information has been stolen and they too should made such notice to authorities in their respective countries.

    But then maybe I can reveal a few things about you Bashi, like that you are not a Russian nationalist, nor even a Russian, oh how naively do Balts here believe in your BS, but well at least you have demonstrated in practice to me how such folks(as a collective) will never be anything else than pawns in the games of the others´.

    Oh and if you got angry because I made a comment about the meaning of circumcision in a Buddhist context then Btw you should check great Buddhist master, a true Pandita, and your former tribesman Berzin's list of major and minor marks of Buddha, where Berzin explains the karmic-causal reason for every body part of the Buddha, how fitting... It was through him that I learned the traditional Buddhist POV in regards of this matter. Maybe you should now dox and hack him, and then upload all his HDD to the internet?

    "His private organ is recessed and remains concealed. This comes from his having strictly kept his pledges of secrecy and having never revealed what was meant to be held confidentially."

    https://studybuddhism.com/en/advanced-studies/lam-rim/refuge/the-32-major-marks-of-a-buddha-s-physical-body

    Bashi it's one thing to harm oneself, like I have done, but to actively and pathologically to lie to others, constantly, to take something that is not yours, in other words to steal, and to claim spiritual understanding and achievements that one has not attained, these Bashi are heavy transgressions in the Dharma, a being that does such things casually has forsaken his intuitive capability to understand Dharma, at least during this current dream that we call our present LIFE. So deeply have you fallen into identity grasping that the rain of Dharma which extinguishes every fire and fever has transformed into an oil spill... If you Bashi think that I have done something bad through my words, then I should remind that you yourself have often here praised Russian Neo-Nazis, even claimed that Hitler would have been better than Stalin for the Russian people and so on and so on. Almost everything that you have written here about yourself has been lies, but almost everything that I have written here has been true, as you know through the contents of my HDD, only a few times I have lied through an omission, like not mentioning that I was very young when I visited the USSR, so young that I dont have memories of it.

    So Dont you think that it would be a good thing for you to self reflect? Even more pathetic is how you again and again write about the same things about the preservation of the bloodline and so on, are you in a doubt? A true believer has no need get affirmation for his beliefs in the internet. A religious person you are not, for an ill will and actively trying to do bad things to others comes to you naturally. Once again I repeat: there's a great difference between doing harm to oneself and actively doing harm to others. You spend too much time here on the internet hacking and spying people, its quite sad if this is how you get your pleasure. Therefore I say to you, get a LIFE Bashi, go outside.

    Still you seem to be agitated and I do not want to leave you in a such state, therefore Bashi I will offer to you victory, you have succeeded in shaming me, and in spying me through your trojans and rootkits, you have even sometimes made me to have an agitated state of mind! Therefore dear Bashi I offer to you victory, smarter you are, full of cunningness, and every day thinking of new ways of defending of ones own kin. For this all I offer to you the sweet nectar cup of Victory!

    And because of you I have finally understood some of the verses of noble Shantideva:

    10. For the sake of accomplishing the welfare of all sentient
    beings, I freely give up my body, enjoyments, and all my
    virtues of the three times.

    11. Surrendering everything is nirvana, and my mind seeks
    nirvana. If I must surrender everything, it is
    better that I give it to sentient beings.

    12. For the sake of all beings I have made this body pleasureless.
    Let them continually beat it, revile it, and cover it with filth.6

    13. Let them play with my body. Let them laugh at it and
    ridicule it. What does it matter to me? I have given my body
    to them.

    14. Let them have me perform deeds that are conducive to their
    happiness.8 Whoever resorts to me, may it never be in vain.

    15. For those who have resorted to me and have an angry or unkind thought, may even that always be the cause for their accomplishing every goal.

    16. May those who falsely accuse me, who harm me, and who
    ridicule me all partake of Awakening

    Also Bashi I have long understood why Desire is bad, but never why Aversion is one the poisons according to the Buddha, after all is it not natural for us to try to escape bad things or try to become free of them, but NO, to believe that anything, whatsoever possesses permanent negative characteristics is a lie, an illusion of the mind. Therefore even you are truly my teacher, how happily I would have been continuing my mindless blabbering here without you creating obstacles, without you creating pressure that led me to think truly and profoundly the problems of my life and in my mind. Truly Bashi you are my teacher in the particular sense as one great ancient master of my school Geshe Langri Thangpa describes in his Eight Verses For the Training the Mind.

    After all everyone of us does receive or take things in life, everyone does receive something, but one day we will need to give everything away, even the smallest figment of our imagination, but in the next life depending on the manner how we have received and how we have given away.....
    Those who have taken in unwholesome ways, will receive unwholesome things, those who have given humbly and freely, without struggle, will get everything easily, almost spontaneously!
    After all penultimate words of Buddha Shakyamuni were: "There's nothing of my own, that's why I am happy!"

    Our mind will one day ceace, all good and bad in it, it is an fact, but we can choose the manner how it will cease, do we struggle and degenerate, desperately trying to hold back as the corruption and degradation that comes with decay when ald age and time takes everything mercilessly away, or do we bravely give everything away, understanding that as things go away, they also do come back, but never as same!





    I have not forgotten your question Coconuts, here is a short explanation how Madhyamika system logics works, bit different from western nominalism. https://twitter.com/sambwinslow/status/1331716185784770560



    I have only now little time ago started to truly believe, before that my faith was only purely rational and passive, I did not I have genuine living faith, emotionally felt, truly there is no greater treasure, no greater fulfillement of every wish. During the last summer I finally met my true Guru, my true Lama and I have now taken refugee into Him, confessed all my sins, without forgetting even a smallest detail. How liberating!

    I will not return here, for I have no interest to get hacked again(ahem javascript attacks), but before I leave I must say to Sher Singh that I am very graceful to you that I have learned more about Sikhi Dharma, truly Shaivism, Vaishnavism, Jainism, Shaktism, Buddhism and Sikhism are just different manifestations of ONE ETERNAL TRUTH. For those who are saved by the God's grace there is the Vishnu, for those are saved by realising that their nature is same as the God's, there is the Shiva, and for those who believe that Man can attain the Godly state there is the Buddha... and so on....
    Together we are one living super organism, and Sikhi Dharma is same as Kshatriya Dharma, necessary prerequisite that there can one day be suitable conditions for Brahmacharya life, so that the holy life could exist and flourish!

    Btw my knowledge was lacking about Vishnu in regards of Buddhadharma

    Here is what is written in an extremely important Mahayana Sutra, Lalitavistarasutra, in which Buddha's life story as a man is told.

    “Because he is endowed with the great strength of Nārāyaṇa, he is called the Great Nārāyaṇa. Because he is endowed with power to tame many millions of demons, he is called the Destroyer of All Adversaries."

    After that verse I almost cried...

    https://read.84000.co/translation/UT22084-046-001.html#node-2801

    Here's another https://suttacentral.net/sn2.12/en/sujato?

    Standing to one side, the god Vishnu recited this verse in the Buddha’s presence:

    “Happy are the children of Manu who pay homage to the Holy One! They apply themselves to Gotama’s instructions, diligently training.”

    “Those who practice absorption in accord with the training”, said the Buddha to Vishnu, “in the way of teaching I’ve proclaimed, they’re in time to be diligent; they won’t fall under the sway of Death.”

    Lastly, but not leastly, great thanks to you Dmitry, you have a noble and great heart, Boddhisattva beings never say that they are Boddhisattvas, they even do not possess such a thought in their heartmind, if they would have such a thought, they would not be boddhisattvas, all views are under birth, decay and death, they change and their true nature is fleeting....

    MEA CULPA

    MEA CULPA

    MEA MAXIMA CULPA

    Quite interestingly and to me even shockingly Vishnu does not bow before Buddha, like it's common with other devas in Buddhist texts...

    Replies: @sher singh, @Bashibuzuk, @Bashibuzuk, @Yahya

    Never a dull moment around here.

    So Dont you think that it would be a good thing for you to self reflect?

    My money is on it being Laxa. The “self-reflect” gave it away.

    • Replies: @Mikel
    @Yahya


    My money is on it being Laxa.
     
    Then she must be pretending to write like a non-native English speaker. Unlikely. And why would she attack Bashibuzuk? I don't remember him being among the ones who contributed to her ban or expressed satisfaction by it.

    The writing style does not look like what I remember from Altan either but by his own admission he sometimes posted drunk, which makes taking that post seriously even less justifiable.

    Bashibuzuk: nobody here believes that you hacked anybody's PC. You would have had to exchange emails with him or something and even then it's no trivial thing to do, apart from being a pretty pointless effort. Ignore the troll.

    Replies: @Barbarossa

  809. @Bashibuzuk
    @EternalReturner1008

    To Ron Unz. This is very concerning and needs being investigated. I am being falsely accused of something that I have never done and frankly that I wouldn't have been capable of doing even if I wanted to. If the person writing above has been hacked into their computer through the use of this site then something is seriously wrong with the security of this forum. I request that this matter be investigated and handed in the serious manner ASAP. I also ask all my personal information be erased from this site.

    Replies: @Bashibuzuk, @Mr. Hack, @Barbarossa

    I was just going to post the issue to the “Bugs and Suggestions” thread where Ron will be more likely to see it, but German Reader graciously beat me to the punch.

    I would recommend sitting tight for a bit before you bail and seeing what happens. We can’t be getting excited over every wanker talking crap on the internet, after all. My bet is that it’s a bunch of steaming BS.

    I, like Yahya and Sher Singh wouldn’t be surprised if it was Laxa, who might be trying to undermine the thread after being barred permanently from it. She is the mistress of sock puppets after all…

    I think we’d all hate to lose you around here.

    • Agree: Yahya
    • Replies: @LatW
    @Barbarossa


    I, like Yahya and Sher Singh wouldn’t be surprised if it was Laxa, who might be trying to undermine the thread after being barred permanently from it. She is the mistress of sock puppets after all…
     
    I doubt it's Laxa (Laxa's English is native, unlike this person's plus it doesn't sound like Laxa's persona). I really, really hope it's not his spouse. We did take up a lot of his time (I feel bad). It's not easy right now for anyone who is married to a Russian, so I am sending all my warmest thoughts their way (if it indeed were to be so, which I hope is not the case and it is just some misunderstanding).

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

  810. @Barbarossa
    @Bashibuzuk

    I was just going to post the issue to the "Bugs and Suggestions" thread where Ron will be more likely to see it, but German Reader graciously beat me to the punch.

    I would recommend sitting tight for a bit before you bail and seeing what happens. We can't be getting excited over every wanker talking crap on the internet, after all. My bet is that it's a bunch of steaming BS.

    I, like Yahya and Sher Singh wouldn't be surprised if it was Laxa, who might be trying to undermine the thread after being barred permanently from it. She is the mistress of sock puppets after all...

    I think we'd all hate to lose you around here.

    Replies: @LatW

    I, like Yahya and Sher Singh wouldn’t be surprised if it was Laxa, who might be trying to undermine the thread after being barred permanently from it. She is the mistress of sock puppets after all…

    I doubt it’s Laxa (Laxa’s English is native, unlike this person’s plus it doesn’t sound like Laxa’s persona). I really, really hope it’s not his spouse. We did take up a lot of his time (I feel bad). It’s not easy right now for anyone who is married to a Russian, so I am sending all my warmest thoughts their way (if it indeed were to be so, which I hope is not the case and it is just some misunderstanding).

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @LatW

    Laxa and Bashibusuk's interactions were civil and friendly. She had no reason to attack Bashi so personally in a needless and shameful way. This sort of an action was definitely not within her modus operandi.

  811. @Yahya
    @EternalReturner1008

    Never a dull moment around here.


    So Dont you think that it would be a good thing for you to self reflect?
     
    My money is on it being Laxa. The "self-reflect" gave it away.

    Replies: @Mikel

    My money is on it being Laxa.

    Then she must be pretending to write like a non-native English speaker. Unlikely. And why would she attack Bashibuzuk? I don’t remember him being among the ones who contributed to her ban or expressed satisfaction by it.

    The writing style does not look like what I remember from Altan either but by his own admission he sometimes posted drunk, which makes taking that post seriously even less justifiable.

    Bashibuzuk: nobody here believes that you hacked anybody’s PC. You would have had to exchange emails with him or something and even then it’s no trivial thing to do, apart from being a pretty pointless effort. Ignore the troll.

    • Replies: @Barbarossa
    @Mikel

    I suppose that the accusation is that an attack of this sort was done. Perhaps technically possible though I'm no expert.

    https://blog.sessionstack.com/how-javascript-works-5-types-of-xss-attacks-tips-on-preventing-them-e6e28327748a

    It could be some version of the Karlin bashing neurotic that used to post around here sometimes. Weird.

    Replies: @LatW, @Mr. Hack, @Dmitry

  812. @Barbarossa
    @Mikel

    It's mostly all Pine and Spruce up there. I don't believe that any hardwood would have been used except perhaps for small structural things like pegs.

    Old growth pine can be really durable and rot resistant; quite unlike most second growth pine you see today which is very fast growing and mostly sapwood. I'm sure the carving would have been pine since spruce would be an absolute misery to carve. Tight grained pine is very nice though.


    a good part of the wood has been replaced over the centuries
     
    This made me think of the human body; how our cells are replaced while we remain constant. It's rather a nice thought that a building would be repaired over centuries rather than just razed and "updated" at the first sign of decay.

    Replies: @Mikel

    I agree. It must be coniferous wood. That’s what people use where it’s abundant, like here in the West. Conifers also give very long straight trunks to cut good boards from.

    In more temperate climates like the Atlantic facade where I was born, hardwood is more abundant and has a very long tradition of being used not just in construction but for shipbuilding too. Transoceanic ships used to be built with beech trees from forests close to where I was born. Once properly tarred, they would last for many decades.

    Do people build with hardwood on the East Coast or do they also prefer conifers? I think you have plenty of hardwood in your forests.

    • Replies: @Barbarossa
    @Mikel

    Most of the normal residential construction around here is the typical commodity framing lumber; either Doug Fir, Hem Fir, or Southern Yellow Pine.
    With all the craziness in lumber pricing I've been using a lot of local material even for stud framing and sheathing. That is mostly White Pine and Hemlock.

    For the timber framing I've used most species available around here. Mostly I use White Pine, Hemlock, and Larch in the softwood department but I also use a lot of Red and White Oak in frames as well as things like Cherry, Ash, Beech etc. for accent woods. The Oak and other hardwoods is harder but tools very nicely and has a crisp finish plus some nice color/ grain.

    We do have a lot of hardwoods here. The state planted vast plantations of softwood when they bought up farmland in the 30's and 50's so much of what I'm using for timbers comes from that stock, but most of that goes back into hardwoods eventually.


    Transoceanic ships used to be built with beech trees from forests close to where I was born. Once properly tarred, they would last for many decades.
     
    That is interesting since Beech has a very low rot resistance, but the tarring would make a great difference there. Around here a lot of old frames from the 19th century have a fair bit of Beech and Maple but they often have a lot of powder post beetle damage. I actually just replaced a 16' section of Beech sill beam on the oldest part of the rental house next to my shop which is from the 1850's. I was surprised that it was Beech, but I suppose if it lasted 150 years that's not too bad!

    Replies: @Mikel

  813. @Mikel
    @Yahya


    My money is on it being Laxa.
     
    Then she must be pretending to write like a non-native English speaker. Unlikely. And why would she attack Bashibuzuk? I don't remember him being among the ones who contributed to her ban or expressed satisfaction by it.

    The writing style does not look like what I remember from Altan either but by his own admission he sometimes posted drunk, which makes taking that post seriously even less justifiable.

    Bashibuzuk: nobody here believes that you hacked anybody's PC. You would have had to exchange emails with him or something and even then it's no trivial thing to do, apart from being a pretty pointless effort. Ignore the troll.

    Replies: @Barbarossa

    I suppose that the accusation is that an attack of this sort was done. Perhaps technically possible though I’m no expert.

    https://blog.sessionstack.com/how-javascript-works-5-types-of-xss-attacks-tips-on-preventing-them-e6e28327748a

    It could be some version of the Karlin bashing neurotic that used to post around here sometimes. Weird.

    • Replies: @LatW
    @Barbarossa


    It could be some version of the Karlin bashing neurotic that used to post around here sometimes. Weird.
     
    That dude was some weird leftie and didn't know Bashi. Frankly, this sounds like someone who had a crush on him and was rejected. I hope she's ok and her pain subsides.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Barbarossa

    , @Mr. Hack
    @Barbarossa

    Bashi named Altan as his first suspect, and I think that he was right. The minutiae of information about Eastern religious things is a dead giveaway. The two of them spent an inordinate amount of time discussing such things. Altan was always ready to lead the charge and prove that his brand of Buddhism was superior to Bashibuzuks. He's doing more of that here.

    , @Dmitry
    @Barbarossa

    He said trojan and rootkit. To have those on your computer, you would need to open a file (like an email attachment or from a website). So, if you think, Bashibuzuk can be a Machiavellian hacker, sending those kind of attachments in emails to us or engineering people to his websites to open them, while pretending to be innocent about modern technology.

    AltanBakshi and Bashibuzuk/Anon4 are some of the more interesting users in the forum, which we always have the most esoteric topics and discussions. We should sponsor for them to buy an antivirus, if this is condition for them to continue to post in the forum without believing they are hacking each other. Something like "Malwarebytes Premium" would stop them from downloading most malware.

    Replies: @Barbarossa

  814. @Barbarossa
    @Mikel

    I suppose that the accusation is that an attack of this sort was done. Perhaps technically possible though I'm no expert.

    https://blog.sessionstack.com/how-javascript-works-5-types-of-xss-attacks-tips-on-preventing-them-e6e28327748a

    It could be some version of the Karlin bashing neurotic that used to post around here sometimes. Weird.

    Replies: @LatW, @Mr. Hack, @Dmitry

    It could be some version of the Karlin bashing neurotic that used to post around here sometimes. Weird.

    That dude was some weird leftie and didn’t know Bashi. Frankly, this sounds like someone who had a crush on him and was rejected. I hope she’s ok and her pain subsides.

    • Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard
    @LatW


    Frankly, this sounds like someone who had a crush on him and was rejected.
     
    Do not put your business into the crazy!

    A friend of mine tells me he just heard from an ex- for the first time in way over ten years. Her husband has decided that he wants to be a she.

    I'm like "No no no no no no no".
    , @Barbarossa
    @LatW


    That dude was some weird leftie and didn’t know Bashi.
     
    I didn't mean that it was the same person, but just a similar dynamic; someone with an inscrutable neurotic beef. In the end, anonymous internet chatter and accusations are pretty much meaningless.

    I really, really hope it’s not his spouse. We did take up a lot of his time
     
    Hopefully not! That would be the most dysfunctional way to get your husband's attention that I can imagine! Fortunately I don't think that scenario seems likely.
    My wife just likes me to share some of the interesting/amusing things I read here. That seems fair enough.

    As Mr. Hack says Altan may be likely. It certainly seems to be someone from Europe with a huge focus on Buddhism.

    Replies: @LatW, @LatW

  815. @LatW
    @Barbarossa


    It could be some version of the Karlin bashing neurotic that used to post around here sometimes. Weird.
     
    That dude was some weird leftie and didn't know Bashi. Frankly, this sounds like someone who had a crush on him and was rejected. I hope she's ok and her pain subsides.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Barbarossa

    Frankly, this sounds like someone who had a crush on him and was rejected.

    Do not put your business into the crazy!

    A friend of mine tells me he just heard from an ex- for the first time in way over ten years. Her husband has decided that he wants to be a she.

    I’m like “No no no no no no no”.

    • Agree: Barbarossa
  816. @Barbarossa
    @Mikel

    I suppose that the accusation is that an attack of this sort was done. Perhaps technically possible though I'm no expert.

    https://blog.sessionstack.com/how-javascript-works-5-types-of-xss-attacks-tips-on-preventing-them-e6e28327748a

    It could be some version of the Karlin bashing neurotic that used to post around here sometimes. Weird.

    Replies: @LatW, @Mr. Hack, @Dmitry

    Bashi named Altan as his first suspect, and I think that he was right. The minutiae of information about Eastern religious things is a dead giveaway. The two of them spent an inordinate amount of time discussing such things. Altan was always ready to lead the charge and prove that his brand of Buddhism was superior to Bashibuzuks. He’s doing more of that here.

  817. @LatW
    @Barbarossa


    It could be some version of the Karlin bashing neurotic that used to post around here sometimes. Weird.
     
    That dude was some weird leftie and didn't know Bashi. Frankly, this sounds like someone who had a crush on him and was rejected. I hope she's ok and her pain subsides.

    Replies: @Emil Nikola Richard, @Barbarossa

    That dude was some weird leftie and didn’t know Bashi.

    I didn’t mean that it was the same person, but just a similar dynamic; someone with an inscrutable neurotic beef. In the end, anonymous internet chatter and accusations are pretty much meaningless.

    I really, really hope it’s not his spouse. We did take up a lot of his time

    Hopefully not! That would be the most dysfunctional way to get your husband’s attention that I can imagine! Fortunately I don’t think that scenario seems likely.
    My wife just likes me to share some of the interesting/amusing things I read here. That seems fair enough.

    As Mr. Hack says Altan may be likely. It certainly seems to be someone from Europe with a huge focus on Buddhism.

    • Replies: @LatW
    @Barbarossa

    I hope not, too. It just sounded like a Western Euro woman. And it really sucks being falsely accused.
    Let's pretend nothing happened and hope he comes back at some point.

    , @LatW
    @Barbarossa


    It certainly seems to be someone from Europe with a huge focus on Buddhism.
     
    Where did that HereBeDragon guy go? It might be him.

    Replies: @Barbarossa

  818. @LatW
    @Barbarossa


    I, like Yahya and Sher Singh wouldn’t be surprised if it was Laxa, who might be trying to undermine the thread after being barred permanently from it. She is the mistress of sock puppets after all…
     
    I doubt it's Laxa (Laxa's English is native, unlike this person's plus it doesn't sound like Laxa's persona). I really, really hope it's not his spouse. We did take up a lot of his time (I feel bad). It's not easy right now for anyone who is married to a Russian, so I am sending all my warmest thoughts their way (if it indeed were to be so, which I hope is not the case and it is just some misunderstanding).

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    Laxa and Bashibusuk’s interactions were civil and friendly. She had no reason to attack Bashi so personally in a needless and shameful way. This sort of an action was definitely not within her modus operandi.

  819. @Barbarossa
    @LatW


    That dude was some weird leftie and didn’t know Bashi.
     
    I didn't mean that it was the same person, but just a similar dynamic; someone with an inscrutable neurotic beef. In the end, anonymous internet chatter and accusations are pretty much meaningless.

    I really, really hope it’s not his spouse. We did take up a lot of his time
     
    Hopefully not! That would be the most dysfunctional way to get your husband's attention that I can imagine! Fortunately I don't think that scenario seems likely.
    My wife just likes me to share some of the interesting/amusing things I read here. That seems fair enough.

    As Mr. Hack says Altan may be likely. It certainly seems to be someone from Europe with a huge focus on Buddhism.

    Replies: @LatW, @LatW

    I hope not, too. It just sounded like a Western Euro woman. And it really sucks being falsely accused.
    Let’s pretend nothing happened and hope he comes back at some point.

  820. @Barbarossa
    @LatW


    That dude was some weird leftie and didn’t know Bashi.
     
    I didn't mean that it was the same person, but just a similar dynamic; someone with an inscrutable neurotic beef. In the end, anonymous internet chatter and accusations are pretty much meaningless.

    I really, really hope it’s not his spouse. We did take up a lot of his time
     
    Hopefully not! That would be the most dysfunctional way to get your husband's attention that I can imagine! Fortunately I don't think that scenario seems likely.
    My wife just likes me to share some of the interesting/amusing things I read here. That seems fair enough.

    As Mr. Hack says Altan may be likely. It certainly seems to be someone from Europe with a huge focus on Buddhism.

    Replies: @LatW, @LatW

    It certainly seems to be someone from Europe with a huge focus on Buddhism.

    Where did that HereBeDragon guy go? It might be him.

    • Replies: @Barbarossa
    @LatW

    That seems unlikely since Here Be Dragon was much more brutal and direct when he wanted to get at someone. He could be wordy but not in such a touchy feely way.

    On that note, it looks like Ron has provided us with a clean slate. Hopefully Bashibuzuk will join us in it at some point!

  821. @LatW
    @Barbarossa


    It certainly seems to be someone from Europe with a huge focus on Buddhism.
     
    Where did that HereBeDragon guy go? It might be him.

    Replies: @Barbarossa

    That seems unlikely since Here Be Dragon was much more brutal and direct when he wanted to get at someone. He could be wordy but not in such a touchy feely way.

    On that note, it looks like Ron has provided us with a clean slate. Hopefully Bashibuzuk will join us in it at some point!

  822. @A123
    It is hard for beggars to run wars when they do not receive handouts. (1)

    More than 1,000 Starlink satellite internet terminals for Ukraine's military to boost communication channels on the modern battlefield went dark, reported CNN, citing two sources familiar with the outage. This report comes even though Elon Musk has pledged to continue funding Starlink operations in the war-torn country.

    The outage has affected 1,300 Starlink terminals that Ukraine purchased from a British company earlier this year and used in combat-related operations. Each terminal costs $2,500 per month, with the batch costing $3.25 million per month.

    Before the terminals went offline, Ukraine's Ministry of Defense requested their British counterparts pick up the monthly bill several weeks ago, which amassed to a whopping $20 million since the 1,300 terminals were deployed in March.
     
    How long will it take for Kiev regime aggression to collapse when the money runs out next year?

    PEACE 😇
    __________

    (1) https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/ukraine-starlink-terminals-go-dark-over-funding-issues

    Replies: @sudden death

    It is hard for beggars to run wars when they do not receive handouts.

    By this logic you just have nicely admitted that in inflation adjusted terms Israel has been the biggest continuous handout starving beggar ever in all of US history;)

    • LOL: A123
    • Replies: @A123
    @sudden death

    https://media.giphy.com/media/o5ng9jQ9CTajS/giphy.gif

     
    ROTFLMAO

    Per capita your;) UNRWA;) Palis;) are the undisputed;), biggest;) continuous handout starving beggars;) ever in planetary history;)

    When will your Abbas;), and your Muslim Authority;) hold elections;)?

    Isn't your Dear Leader:) in the 18th;) year of his 4;) year term in office;)?
    ____

    Also, indigenous Palestinian Jews want to avoid your violence;)

    Look at the outreach from incoming Israeli leaders (below);)

    PEACE 😇


    https://twitter.com/Doranimated/status/1588923384280543235?s=20

    Replies: @sudden death

  823. The Russians will not use a nuclear weapon in Ukraine unless they perceive they have to. And the Chinese would not want Russia to be eliminated as a great power, which means if Putin says to Xi ‘I used a nuke’, Xi will reply “Well if you had to do it you had to do it”. But China will be ready willing and able supply conventional weapons to Russia to if that is what is needed to it prevent it getting into the situation where is thinks it has to use a nuke. China does not want Russia defeated. and it may suit China to have Western attention and effort focused on total open ended commitment to giving Ukraine more and more advanced weapon. The Chinese sockpuppet of North Korea is being used to supply artilley amunition to Russia. Hence, Ukraine cannot end this war, even if Russia is pushed back to its 2013 border.

    The key military reason for being defeated in Vietnam was America didn’t go beyond a draft and declare national mobilisation /call out the reserves to smother the enemy with numbers. And the key reason for not taking the aforementioned steps was the US fear of China intervening as it had in Korea. Russia knows America is not going to send its army or air force to fight in Ukraine, so Russia has no fear of drawing on reserves; there are many millions of Russian reservists available in addition to the 300,000 ex soldiers already brought back.

    Russia is prolly going to end the war a la Minsk, with an agreement that will not hold. The next war will be against Russian army 2.0, and Ukraine will have no surprises draw on Russia’s full strength ASAP. Zelensky’s close adviser Oleksiy Arestovych predicted the war would start in 2022, and he said it was only going to be the first one of two or three. My bet is the American Deep State plans to take Russia down very, very slowly. Russia intends to take a cofee break

    • Replies: @LatW
    @Sean


    And the Chinese would not want Russia to be eliminated as a great power, which means if Putin says to Xi ‘I used a nuke’, Xi will reply “Well if you had to do it you had to do it”.
     
    Are you sure this is a 100% clear? Would Xi really be that nonchalant about this kind of a prospect? Could Xi potentially be the one to stop this? And India, too. Apparently, even within the limited nuclear use scenario (hypothetical), India would be faced with a major famine that could affect millions (if not tens of millions).


    But China will be ready willing and able supply conventional weapons to Russia
     
    Are you talking about this being done in the open or some kind of a clandestine supply route? Would this not become visible pretty quickly? From what I understand, anecdotally, Ukrainian troops have encountered supplies on the battle field with Asian characters / hierogliphs (but those could've been from North Korea). If there were to be more serious supplies, wouldn't this be immediately visible to the UK/US/Israel intelligence services?

    there are many millions of Russian reservists available in addition to the 300,000 ex soldiers already brought back.
     
    There are supply bottlenecks, they are having a rough time equipping even the current ones. Not saying they can't eventually, they typically are able to overwhelm with mass, just that they have only now started to mobilize the society (unlike Ukrainians who established volunteer supply networks years ago). Rabid religious talk on TV, etc. They are actually employing children to sow uniforms and knit socks (kind of reminds me of what the Germans did in the occupied territories in 1943 when faced with General Frost), again, it doesn't mean things are necessarily all dire, it's just data. Of course, they also ordered uniforms in Belarus and somewhere in the East. But that's not even the main issue, the mobilized ones, even if fully dressed for winter, will be facing artillery from the distance, not so much get involved in close combat. Some of them will be gone before knowing what hit them. They will spend the whole winter in the cold step and then next year Ukraine will receive more weapons. Again, I'm not saying it's a given, as they have indeed finally started mobilizing for real, as it appears.

    Zelensky’s close adviser Oleksiy Arestovych predicted the war would start in 2022, and he said it was only going to be the first one of two or three.
     
    Yes, he did give those three dates, although it seems that, while accurate, they are still hypothetical. Even he was surprised by how bad Russia was faring. If Kherson falls, the political repercussions could be severe. Of course, that doesn't mean there could be no more wars, it's possible that this will become a permanent state between Russia and her neighbors. Alas.

    Btw, Arestovych does daily briefs about the situation on the frontlines and here is a source with some decent interpreting of these convos, in case you might be interested. In the conversation they had yesterday, they introduced a term "Kuzmich", borrowed from Russian propagandists. "Kuzmich" is a name they're using to describe a kind of a salt of the earth type of Russian man who has been mobilized from the glubinka (underprivileged area) and who will be forced to fight this war now that all those previous mistakes were made by the professionals. The average age of the mobilized is apparently 35. No offense, but this is going to be very tough physical work better suited for younger men.

    The most recent sitrep with Arestovych (+ opinions about the US political situation and how it could affect arms supplies starting around 16:20):

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KFTpGEbKHxM

    Arestovych's convo with Yulia Latynina (a very smart Russian lady historian):

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=28bLrBs9qlM

    Replies: @Sean

  824. @sudden death
    @A123


    It is hard for beggars to run wars when they do not receive handouts.
     
    By this logic you just have nicely admitted that in inflation adjusted terms Israel has been the biggest continuous handout starving beggar ever in all of US history;)

    Replies: @A123

     
    ROTFLMAO

    Per capita your;) UNRWA;) Palis;) are the undisputed;), biggest;) continuous handout starving beggars;) ever in planetary history;)

    When will your Abbas;), and your Muslim Authority;) hold elections;)?

    Isn’t your Dear Leader:) in the 18th;) year of his 4;) year term in office;)?
    ____

    Also, indigenous Palestinian Jews want to avoid your violence;)

    Look at the outreach from incoming Israeli leaders (below);)

    PEACE 😇

    • Replies: @sudden death
    @A123

    haha, don't care in the slightest neither about current Fatahland nor Hamasland affairs, but Israel was fighting not just them only when really serious and not that easy war like Yom Kippur were going in 1973, while getting tremendous amount of US handouts.

    Following your own logic further - those handouts for starving israelite beggars also were the primary reason for oil embargo and subsequent oil price schock+huge economic crisis which hardest affected all the US home industry and ordinary working Americans then. If they were not given to Isreal, USA would still have uninterupted cheap oil supply at the time and no huge stagflation and devaluation, so all your current handout related chutzpah is quite on thin ice;)

    Replies: @A123

  825. @A123
    @sudden death

    https://media.giphy.com/media/o5ng9jQ9CTajS/giphy.gif

     
    ROTFLMAO

    Per capita your;) UNRWA;) Palis;) are the undisputed;), biggest;) continuous handout starving beggars;) ever in planetary history;)

    When will your Abbas;), and your Muslim Authority;) hold elections;)?

    Isn't your Dear Leader:) in the 18th;) year of his 4;) year term in office;)?
    ____

    Also, indigenous Palestinian Jews want to avoid your violence;)

    Look at the outreach from incoming Israeli leaders (below);)

    PEACE 😇


    https://twitter.com/Doranimated/status/1588923384280543235?s=20

    Replies: @sudden death

    haha, don’t care in the slightest neither about current Fatahland nor Hamasland affairs, but Israel was fighting not just them only when really serious and not that easy war like Yom Kippur were going in 1973, while getting tremendous amount of US handouts.

    Following your own logic further – those handouts for starving israelite beggars also were the primary reason for oil embargo and subsequent oil price schock+huge economic crisis which hardest affected all the US home industry and ordinary working Americans then. If they were not given to Isreal, USA would still have uninterupted cheap oil supply at the time and no huge stagflation and devaluation, so all your current handout related chutzpah is quite on thin ice;)

    • Replies: @A123
    @sudden death

    Your Taqiyya;) deception is pathetic;).

    This undeniable;) conclusion follows your logic;) You obviously;) care deeply about;)

    -- your #1 per capita graft;)
    -- your UNRWA;),
    -- your Fatahland;), and
    -- your Hamasland;)

    Your passionate support for your Abbas;) is indisputable;) When will your precious Muslim Authority;) hold elections;)? Your Dear Leader's:) 18th;) year of his 4;) year term in office;) is quite problematic;)

    Your credibility;) is sinking underwater faster than a mobster;) in Cement Shoes;)

    PEACE 😇

  826. @sudden death
    @A123

    haha, don't care in the slightest neither about current Fatahland nor Hamasland affairs, but Israel was fighting not just them only when really serious and not that easy war like Yom Kippur were going in 1973, while getting tremendous amount of US handouts.

    Following your own logic further - those handouts for starving israelite beggars also were the primary reason for oil embargo and subsequent oil price schock+huge economic crisis which hardest affected all the US home industry and ordinary working Americans then. If they were not given to Isreal, USA would still have uninterupted cheap oil supply at the time and no huge stagflation and devaluation, so all your current handout related chutzpah is quite on thin ice;)

    Replies: @A123

    Your Taqiyya;) deception is pathetic;).

    This undeniable;) conclusion follows your logic;) You obviously;) care deeply about;)

    — your #1 per capita graft;)
    — your UNRWA;),
    — your Fatahland;), and
    — your Hamasland;)

    Your passionate support for your Abbas;) is indisputable;) When will your precious Muslim Authority;) hold elections;)? Your Dear Leader’s:) 18th;) year of his 4;) year term in office;) is quite problematic;)

    Your credibility;) is sinking underwater faster than a mobster;) in Cement Shoes;)

    PEACE 😇

  827. @Coconuts
    @Dmitry


    But in Greece, for example, the pantheism was represented in the pantheon.
     
    I may be wrong about this but I thought pantheism was the idea that the universe is made of God so its contents are all parts of God. I also thought this idea that all gods contain aspects of each other could be syncretism without becoming pantheism, afaik Neo-Platonists would believe that all the gods reflect the One, but they are emanations of it and definitely not parts of it.

    Although in Medieval times, you could have been persecuted as Cathars for saying this and you would be hunted by the authorities as a heretic in the Pyrenees mountains.
     
    Again, I thought Cathars were supposed to be strong dualists and believe that matter was evil, this would seem to be the opposite of pantheism and thinking that matter is a part of God.

    There seems to be a developing trend among historians of Catharism to suggest it was as much a creation of medieval Churchmen and inquisitors as an existing distinct belief system, similar to the creation process of witchcraft beliefs in the late 15th/early 16th C.

    Replies: @silviosilver, @Dmitry

    I thought pantheism was the idea that the universe is made of God

    Yes sorry it was my mistake, I wrote the correction of words under the post.
    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-200/#comment-5641322 The word I was miswriting is “polytheism”, not “pantheism”. We have lack of edit function after 5 minutes unfortunately (which we should ask Unz about) so I had to add another post.

    Cathars were supposed to be strong dualists and believe that matter was evil

    If you look in those Iron Age text https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Job It’s impossible to avoid that Satan (in this example of text) employee for God.

    Sure, middle ages Cathars might have believed many things (including Satan is the ruler of this planet), which are difficult to know today, as there are centuries when their beliefs are banned, after they have been murdered. Unfortunately, Catholic Church has murdered the Cathars and we can’t talk to them.

    But my claim is not about Cathars specifically, but to write, there are aspects about the Gods in the ancient texts, which would have caused a lot of controversy in medieval times. For example, Satan is not viewed as distinct from God or working for a negative result in this example, which could be almost Cathar kind of controversy within the different epoch.

    celibates ends up enhancing the reproductive chances of their siblings and relations, similar to the ‘gay uncle effect’.

    Isn’t this popular “evolutionary psychology” a pseudoscience for the popular magazines people read in the hair salon, that requires you to not read history, and not accept how people are motivated in real world? They are from the category of “Just-so story” as Utu wrote this here. In this example, its main assumption is already disproved by any knowledge of history i.e. popularity of anti-natalist religions of the ancient world.

    For example, Christians who have access to the Christian texts, are not celibate as an “evolutionary strategy to increase the reproductive chances of siblings”. They are celibate usually because you only have one opportunity of life before the Judgement Day. They were God-fearing people and Judgement Day is scary for the sinner.

    Any person having children is to some extent in the New Testament is a voluntary additional sinner, as having children means you cannot control lust, according to Paul. New Testament says marriage is only acceptable if you cannot control lust, so having children are automatically is more near the position which implies your future will be eternity of hell. .

    Francis of Assisi is not exiting life of golden youth because he believes, this will impress women or help his nephew. He is exiting golden youths’ life, because he has a religious conversion and views the luxury life, was not important compared to the religious life.

    Saint Marina is not trying to increase prestige for her family. More, the result is the opposite, which is one of the stress tests for her.

    I would agree there are some religious cults, created lies by the cult leader to scam for money and sex (e.g. Joseph Smith). So, you could explain Joseph Smith, by evolutionary psychology (except he was infertile). But the cult leader like Joseph Smith are only successful, because people really believe the lies and then subsequent motivation of the victims of the cult is related to the content of those lies, without motives for adding additional motivation.

    An example are Jehovah’s Witnesses, who try to avoid having children because they believe only limited number of people can be saved in the apocalypse. You cannot explain with the “Just-so stories” from evolutionary psychology this anti-natalism of Jehovah Witnesses. Much more simply, they believe the religious content which has anti-natalism as logical implication.

    It seems particularly curious when white Europeans propagate anti-natalist doctrines among themselves, but not among non-white people living in the same country, and are simultaneously intent on growing their county’s population, this is strange wisdom and might be some kind of ideological artefact (if it is not evidence of harmful mutations)?

    One of the things is the pension system of developed welfare countries almost requires fertility rate is at least 2,1, if there was not immigration. But if fertility rate is below replacement, it becomes like a pyramid without the mass immigration.

    Accountancy and financial system of developed countries, was based from constant population growth, while the motivation of capitalism rewards expanding market size. Politicians of superpowers or great powers like America and Russia also have incentive for expanding population to pay for their armies.

    After the population boom from removal of Malthusian constraints in the industrial revolution, nowadays people in high income and middle income countries (and even low income countries like Bangladesh) are seeming to move to family planning which would improve the world if everyone follows them and immigration would end (both internal and external immigration).

    Even the third world countries have falling fertility rates and could converge with the developed countries, before they will become developed. For example, China and India expanded to the nightmare population size in the 20th century, but will begin falling in the second half of 21st century. China will fall to around 1 billion people by 2100, from 1,45 billion today.

    But this wouldn’t create quiet uncrowded space in developed countries, as the motive for continued population increase would continue, and also the precondition to allow increase despite lowering fertility by the mechanism of immigration and easy transport.

    Today, countries with the lowest fertility rates in the world like Poland, Bulgaria and (soon) Ukraine, are sending mass immigration to Western Europe, because of income difference. If Russia (in Russia slavic fertility rates are lower than Japanese fertility rates) has open borders with Western Europe, most of the young population would emigrate as soon as they can and there would be increasing overpopulation of the UK.

    Mexico is gong to below replacement fertility, but there are still perhaps more than a hundred million people in Mexico who would like to live in America and the incentives in America could reply on the expanding population.

  828. @Bashibuzuk
    @Bashibuzuk

    To everyone on UR who read my posts and discussed with me. Thanks! What has just happened leaves me no other choice but to leave this forum for good. If the person writing above is right about someone hacking into their computer through the use of this site, then we should all be extra careful.

    AND NO I HAVE NOT HACKED IN ANYONE'S COMPUTER. I AM NOT A HACKER AND I DON'T KNOW WHY THE PERSON ABOVE ACCUSES ME AND WRITES SUCH TERRIBLE THINGS. FAREWELL EVERYONE.

    Replies: @silviosilver, @S, @LatW, @Dmitry

    Lol you don’t need to be easily trolled. Altan and you have been disagreeing about Buddhism. Most everyone here can agree with Altan many of your views are not consistent with Buddhism.

    But forum is a social space, where our comments are not representation of our views, but often related to the reaction we want from another user, just comments on comments. I know I am mostly posting to the discussion in the forum as “devil’s advocate” and often not representing my views clearly.

    In same way, I don’t think you “support Hitler”. If I remember, there was social pressure in this forum for you to show you are a “real nationalist”, because of this context where the Middle Eastern blogger is writing “nationalism is supporting Putin”.

    For example, I wrote many times in past years in the forum about Ukraine with rude tone, which looks unpleasant after February 24. That is because of falling to a dialogue with crazy views of the user AP. Half my posts will look stupid like that, but perhaps the overall discussion they create was interesting.

    Two years ago, we were both writing in the racist snobby way about Armenians and Azerbaijanis, when they entered a war which doesn’t have boiling of heads. Retrospectively, our comments look like dark comedy before the abyss, when Armenia-Azerbaijan is just a little hors d’oeuvre for Russia-Ukraine. It’s because at the time we want to add distance from them, which creates nervous forum writings like that. But in the real thoughts and instincts of the time, the motivation was the fear Armenia-Azerbaijan is a mirror and they are not distant, but ugly they looked they were relatively a rosy mirror.

    • Replies: @LatW
    @Dmitry


    Lol you don’t need to be easily trolled.
     
    It was pretty bad and he doesn't deserve such stupid accusations. :( But what he needs to understand is that attractive people who stand out often get harassed, including online. This happens, strangers call you out of the blue, send you pics you didn't ask for, and, if you reject them, they will come and accuse you of crazy things. It's what happens when you are popular.

    Replies: @Dmitry

  829. @Barbarossa
    @Mikel

    I suppose that the accusation is that an attack of this sort was done. Perhaps technically possible though I'm no expert.

    https://blog.sessionstack.com/how-javascript-works-5-types-of-xss-attacks-tips-on-preventing-them-e6e28327748a

    It could be some version of the Karlin bashing neurotic that used to post around here sometimes. Weird.

    Replies: @LatW, @Mr. Hack, @Dmitry

    He said trojan and rootkit. To have those on your computer, you would need to open a file (like an email attachment or from a website). So, if you think, Bashibuzuk can be a Machiavellian hacker, sending those kind of attachments in emails to us or engineering people to his websites to open them, while pretending to be innocent about modern technology.

    AltanBakshi and Bashibuzuk/Anon4 are some of the more interesting users in the forum, which we always have the most esoteric topics and discussions. We should sponsor for them to buy an antivirus, if this is condition for them to continue to post in the forum without believing they are hacking each other. Something like “Malwarebytes Premium” would stop them from downloading most malware.

    • Replies: @Barbarossa
    @Dmitry

    Oh, I don't think that Bashi is guilty of any Machiavellian hacking at all. I'd actually be more than happy to pay for Bashibuzuk's anti-virus for a year. Sadly it seems that Bashibuzuk has vamoosed for the time being. Hopefully he'll be back.

  830. @songbird
    @Thulean Friend

    What I think is remarkable about the story is that Musk appears to be something of an autist, and yet, he was still amazingly circumspect going into this. Saying that he was not the one to make the decision to let Kanye back, and willingly meeting with these different groups, which I am sure is not enjoyable.

    Replies: @Dmitry

    What is the current business model of Twitter?

    It has valuation of billions of dollars, mainly because it used by celebrities and politicians. The ordinary people go to the website because to read the celebrities and politicians. And advertisers sell to the ordinary people who come to watch celebrities.

    It’s like a fashionable nightclub for celebrities and politicians that is on stage above ordinary people. And revenue is from advertising to the people below while they watching hypnotized by the celebrities and politicians.

    Goose that lays the Golden Eggs for Twitter, are the celebrities and politicians. It’s not like Facebook with useful data.

    So, Musk has bought website version of a fashionable nightclub.

    Normally, you would say, the most important plan for Twitter, is that the experience there will be pleasant for the celebrities and politicians and the advertisers who use them. This the Goose you don’t want to kill.

    Although perhaps he has enough money and madness that he might want to change its business model. Although social media is not the most romantic industry. Surely, it would have been more romantic for him if he bought a real nightclub or restaurant.

  831. @Sean
    The Russians will not use a nuclear weapon in Ukraine unless they perceive they have to. And the Chinese would not want Russia to be eliminated as a great power, which means if Putin says to Xi 'I used a nuke', Xi will reply "Well if you had to do it you had to do it". But China will be ready willing and able supply conventional weapons to Russia to if that is what is needed to it prevent it getting into the situation where is thinks it has to use a nuke. China does not want Russia defeated. and it may suit China to have Western attention and effort focused on total open ended commitment to giving Ukraine more and more advanced weapon. The Chinese sockpuppet of North Korea is being used to supply artilley amunition to Russia. Hence, Ukraine cannot end this war, even if Russia is pushed back to its 2013 border.

    The key military reason for being defeated in Vietnam was America didn't go beyond a draft and declare national mobilisation /call out the reserves to smother the enemy with numbers. And the key reason for not taking the aforementioned steps was the US fear of China intervening as it had in Korea. Russia knows America is not going to send its army or air force to fight in Ukraine, so Russia has no fear of drawing on reserves; there are many millions of Russian reservists available in addition to the 300,000 ex soldiers already brought back.

    Russia is prolly going to end the war a la Minsk, with an agreement that will not hold. The next war will be against Russian army 2.0, and Ukraine will have no surprises draw on Russia’s full strength ASAP. Zelensky’s close adviser Oleksiy Arestovych predicted the war would start in 2022, and he said it was only going to be the first one of two or three. My bet is the American Deep State plans to take Russia down very, very slowly. Russia intends to take a cofee break

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rv8mHoJhlLU

    Replies: @LatW

    And the Chinese would not want Russia to be eliminated as a great power, which means if Putin says to Xi ‘I used a nuke’, Xi will reply “Well if you had to do it you had to do it”.

    Are you sure this is a 100% clear? Would Xi really be that nonchalant about this kind of a prospect? Could Xi potentially be the one to stop this? And India, too. Apparently, even within the limited nuclear use scenario (hypothetical), India would be faced with a major famine that could affect millions (if not tens of millions).

    [MORE]

    But China will be ready willing and able supply conventional weapons to Russia

    Are you talking about this being done in the open or some kind of a clandestine supply route? Would this not become visible pretty quickly? From what I understand, anecdotally, Ukrainian troops have encountered supplies on the battle field with Asian characters / hierogliphs (but those could’ve been from North Korea). If there were to be more serious supplies, wouldn’t this be immediately visible to the UK/US/Israel intelligence services?

    there are many millions of Russian reservists available in addition to the 300,000 ex soldiers already brought back.

    There are supply bottlenecks, they are having a rough time equipping even the current ones. Not saying they can’t eventually, they typically are able to overwhelm with mass, just that they have only now started to mobilize the society (unlike Ukrainians who established volunteer supply networks years ago). Rabid religious talk on TV, etc. They are actually employing children to sow uniforms and knit socks (kind of reminds me of what the Germans did in the occupied territories in 1943 when faced with General Frost), again, it doesn’t mean things are necessarily all dire, it’s just data. Of course, they also ordered uniforms in Belarus and somewhere in the East. But that’s not even the main issue, the mobilized ones, even if fully dressed for winter, will be facing artillery from the distance, not so much get involved in close combat. Some of them will be gone before knowing what hit them. They will spend the whole winter in the cold step and then next year Ukraine will receive more weapons. Again, I’m not saying it’s a given, as they have indeed finally started mobilizing for real, as it appears.

    Zelensky’s close adviser Oleksiy Arestovych predicted the war would start in 2022, and he said it was only going to be the first one of two or three.

    Yes, he did give those three dates, although it seems that, while accurate, they are still hypothetical. Even he was surprised by how bad Russia was faring. If Kherson falls, the political repercussions could be severe. Of course, that doesn’t mean there could be no more wars, it’s possible that this will become a permanent state between Russia and her neighbors. Alas.

    Btw, Arestovych does daily briefs about the situation on the frontlines and here is a source with some decent interpreting of these convos, in case you might be interested. In the conversation they had yesterday, they introduced a term “Kuzmich”, borrowed from Russian propagandists. “Kuzmich” is a name they’re using to describe a kind of a salt of the earth type of Russian man who has been mobilized from the glubinka (underprivileged area) and who will be forced to fight this war now that all those previous mistakes were made by the professionals. The average age of the mobilized is apparently 35. No offense, but this is going to be very tough physical work better suited for younger men.

    The most recent sitrep with Arestovych (+ opinions about the US political situation and how it could affect arms supplies starting around 16:20):

    Arestovych’s convo with Yulia Latynina (a very smart Russian lady historian):

    • Replies: @Sean
    @LatW


    Would Xi really be that nonchalant about this kind of a prospect?
     
    Russia would have to be in a hell of a fix to do it, and that would be obvious to the Chinese leader, who would not be nonchalant about the prospect of Russia ceasing to deter American adventurism.

    India would be faced with a major famine that could affect millions (if not tens of millions).
     

    India is only neutral, and Russia is only the words biggest wheat exporter. China produces more wheat than Russia and togetherChina and Russia can keep Idia happy and if it goes over to the US's side then it will be America's responsibility to feed. Yet in terms of food supply Russia and China are the side to be in the good books of . They are a good fit like husband and wife Russia does the military stuff deterring and distracting the US; meanwhile China cam devote a small amount of it resources to military spending (especially nuclear ) to concentrate on economic growth; the latter was the recipe for the postwar German miracle.

    Are you talking about this being done in the open or some kind of a clandestine supply route?
     
    It is being done semi covertly already because North Korea is giving Russia artillery ammunition and as NK is a Chinese sockpuppet you can bet that China is replacing those shells leaving the NK inventory for Russia. Other things such as drones and missiles might be supplied in the same way if the US was to give Ukraine longer range missiles, Abrams tanks and F16s, which it prolly will have to because the Soviet stuff and the spares to repair it is going to be gone through be sometime next year.

    If Kherson falls, the political repercussions could be severe.
     

    The city straddles the river. West bank Kherson is a nuisance rather than a prize. Ukraine is not going to let Russia stage a fighting retreat and attrite Ukraine's precious offensive capable troopss. Even if Ukraine got into West Kherson because the Russians finally withdrew across the river before it froze, as seems likely to happen, the Ukrainw would have merely freed to Russia to destroy all the bridges across the Dnipro and cripple Ukrainian logistics into East Ukraine. The refusal to supply Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) to Ukraine is an indication--by my way of thinking-- of US aversion to Ukraine advancing much further in the South, because that would mean even without ATACMS they'd be in range for firing endless barrages of missiles from HIMARS into the Russian bases on Crimea. America would rather the Ukrainians cannot do that because as soon as it can, the US would have to explicitly forbid them from doing so. That would be turning up the heat under the frog too quickly and alarm Beijing into using NK to to supply Russia with things previously withheld; China has factory complexes with more workers that the British army has workers. Can you imagine if North Korea announced it has developed an advanced high speed but relatively silent suicide drone (in the same egregious way it suddenly conjured monstrous ICBM and nuke warhead tech attainments just when Trump got elected promising to check China's deindustiralisation of the West and its denuding the deplorables of earning jobs).

    The most recent sitrep with Arestovych (+ opinions about the US political situation
     
    The obstacle for Ukraine in getting all the arms types it wants from America lies not in US politics but in the stratagem being pursued by America's Deep State, which means the OBJ of America as given by Lloyd Austin is not for Ukraine to win, but rather to weaken Russia. Ukraine's objective is to win back its lost territories. I see the historical parallel as with France in WW1: revanchism. Raymond Poincaré ("In all my years at school I saw no other reason to live than the possibility of recovering our lost provinces") became President of the Republic in 1913, his election had been helped by two million francs in Russian bribes to the French press. Poincaré anticipated war in two years and announced that his entire effort was to prepare for it. Poincaré (cousin of the superbrain phycisist) was at 20 years old the youngest lawyer in France. Arestovych and Zelensky are quite capable men and it seems they are, like Poincaré, going to get what they wanted, but at a cost they never dreamt of.

    Replies: @LatW

  832. @Dmitry
    @Bashibuzuk

    Lol you don't need to be easily trolled. Altan and you have been disagreeing about Buddhism. Most everyone here can agree with Altan many of your views are not consistent with Buddhism.

    But forum is a social space, where our comments are not representation of our views, but often related to the reaction we want from another user, just comments on comments. I know I am mostly posting to the discussion in the forum as "devil's advocate" and often not representing my views clearly.

    In same way, I don't think you "support Hitler". If I remember, there was social pressure in this forum for you to show you are a "real nationalist", because of this context where the Middle Eastern blogger is writing "nationalism is supporting Putin".

    For example, I wrote many times in past years in the forum about Ukraine with rude tone, which looks unpleasant after February 24. That is because of falling to a dialogue with crazy views of the user AP. Half my posts will look stupid like that, but perhaps the overall discussion they create was interesting.

    Two years ago, we were both writing in the racist snobby way about Armenians and Azerbaijanis, when they entered a war which doesn't have boiling of heads. Retrospectively, our comments look like dark comedy before the abyss, when Armenia-Azerbaijan is just a little hors d'oeuvre for Russia-Ukraine. It's because at the time we want to add distance from them, which creates nervous forum writings like that. But in the real thoughts and instincts of the time, the motivation was the fear Armenia-Azerbaijan is a mirror and they are not distant, but ugly they looked they were relatively a rosy mirror.

    Replies: @LatW

    Lol you don’t need to be easily trolled.

    It was pretty bad and he doesn’t deserve such stupid accusations. 🙁 But what he needs to understand is that attractive people who stand out often get harassed, including online. This happens, strangers call you out of the blue, send you pics you didn’t ask for, and, if you reject them, they will come and accuse you of crazy things. It’s what happens when you are popular.

    • Replies: @Dmitry
    @LatW

    From my memory, AltanBakshi and Bashibuzuk/Anon4 did not seem bad with each other. I had thought them as a pair because they were significantly replying to each other.

    If it was management decisions, you could have added them on a team together. But remember all those hours, they were arguing about religion which can be a personal/triggering topic.

    AltanBakshi says that Bashibuzuk/Anon4 writes nationalist views, or said he likes Hitler, which are not matching Buddhism. At the same time, he writes that Bashibuzuk says to AltanBakshi that he follows Buddhism. So, this must be how the disagreement between them began.

    Especially with internet forums, you don't really know when you are stand on someone's sore areas. I remember Bashibuzuk writing unpredictably angry with me when I posted a joke and video about Yeltsin centre (a community centre in Russia named for the "democratic" president). Mikel was becoming crazy and delusional when I said something about Mormons. Even I have some kind of limit for number of posts from AP I can read, with no offense for AP who I hope will be here again with us soon.

    Replies: @LatW, @Mikel

  833. @LatW
    @Sean


    And the Chinese would not want Russia to be eliminated as a great power, which means if Putin says to Xi ‘I used a nuke’, Xi will reply “Well if you had to do it you had to do it”.
     
    Are you sure this is a 100% clear? Would Xi really be that nonchalant about this kind of a prospect? Could Xi potentially be the one to stop this? And India, too. Apparently, even within the limited nuclear use scenario (hypothetical), India would be faced with a major famine that could affect millions (if not tens of millions).


    But China will be ready willing and able supply conventional weapons to Russia
     
    Are you talking about this being done in the open or some kind of a clandestine supply route? Would this not become visible pretty quickly? From what I understand, anecdotally, Ukrainian troops have encountered supplies on the battle field with Asian characters / hierogliphs (but those could've been from North Korea). If there were to be more serious supplies, wouldn't this be immediately visible to the UK/US/Israel intelligence services?

    there are many millions of Russian reservists available in addition to the 300,000 ex soldiers already brought back.
     
    There are supply bottlenecks, they are having a rough time equipping even the current ones. Not saying they can't eventually, they typically are able to overwhelm with mass, just that they have only now started to mobilize the society (unlike Ukrainians who established volunteer supply networks years ago). Rabid religious talk on TV, etc. They are actually employing children to sow uniforms and knit socks (kind of reminds me of what the Germans did in the occupied territories in 1943 when faced with General Frost), again, it doesn't mean things are necessarily all dire, it's just data. Of course, they also ordered uniforms in Belarus and somewhere in the East. But that's not even the main issue, the mobilized ones, even if fully dressed for winter, will be facing artillery from the distance, not so much get involved in close combat. Some of them will be gone before knowing what hit them. They will spend the whole winter in the cold step and then next year Ukraine will receive more weapons. Again, I'm not saying it's a given, as they have indeed finally started mobilizing for real, as it appears.

    Zelensky’s close adviser Oleksiy Arestovych predicted the war would start in 2022, and he said it was only going to be the first one of two or three.
     
    Yes, he did give those three dates, although it seems that, while accurate, they are still hypothetical. Even he was surprised by how bad Russia was faring. If Kherson falls, the political repercussions could be severe. Of course, that doesn't mean there could be no more wars, it's possible that this will become a permanent state between Russia and her neighbors. Alas.

    Btw, Arestovych does daily briefs about the situation on the frontlines and here is a source with some decent interpreting of these convos, in case you might be interested. In the conversation they had yesterday, they introduced a term "Kuzmich", borrowed from Russian propagandists. "Kuzmich" is a name they're using to describe a kind of a salt of the earth type of Russian man who has been mobilized from the glubinka (underprivileged area) and who will be forced to fight this war now that all those previous mistakes were made by the professionals. The average age of the mobilized is apparently 35. No offense, but this is going to be very tough physical work better suited for younger men.

    The most recent sitrep with Arestovych (+ opinions about the US political situation and how it could affect arms supplies starting around 16:20):

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KFTpGEbKHxM

    Arestovych's convo with Yulia Latynina (a very smart Russian lady historian):

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=28bLrBs9qlM

    Replies: @Sean

    Would Xi really be that nonchalant about this kind of a prospect?

    Russia would have to be in a hell of a fix to do it, and that would be obvious to the Chinese leader, who would not be nonchalant about the prospect of Russia ceasing to deter American adventurism.

    India would be faced with a major famine that could affect millions (if not tens of millions).

    India is only neutral, and Russia is only the words biggest wheat exporter. China produces more wheat than Russia and togetherChina and Russia can keep Idia happy and if it goes over to the US’s side then it will be America’s responsibility to feed. Yet in terms of food supply Russia and China are the side to be in the good books of . They are a good fit like husband and wife Russia does the military stuff deterring and distracting the US; meanwhile China cam devote a small amount of it resources to military spending (especially nuclear ) to concentrate on economic growth; the latter was the recipe for the postwar German miracle.

    Are you talking about this being done in the open or some kind of a clandestine supply route?

    It is being done semi covertly already because North Korea is giving Russia artillery ammunition and as NK is a Chinese sockpuppet you can bet that China is replacing those shells leaving the NK inventory for Russia. Other things such as drones and missiles might be supplied in the same way if the US was to give Ukraine longer range missiles, Abrams tanks and F16s, which it prolly will have to because the Soviet stuff and the spares to repair it is going to be gone through be sometime next year.

    If Kherson falls, the political repercussions could be severe.

    The city straddles the river. West bank Kherson is a nuisance rather than a prize. Ukraine is not going to let Russia stage a fighting retreat and attrite Ukraine’s precious offensive capable troopss. Even if Ukraine got into West Kherson because the Russians finally withdrew across the river before it froze, as seems likely to happen, the Ukrainw would have merely freed to Russia to destroy all the bridges across the Dnipro and cripple Ukrainian logistics into East Ukraine. The refusal to supply Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) to Ukraine is an indication–by my way of thinking– of US aversion to Ukraine advancing much further in the South, because that would mean even without ATACMS they’d be in range for firing endless barrages of missiles from HIMARS into the Russian bases on Crimea. America would rather the Ukrainians cannot do that because as soon as it can, the US would have to explicitly forbid them from doing so. That would be turning up the heat under the frog too quickly and alarm Beijing into using NK to to supply Russia with things previously withheld; China has factory complexes with more workers that the British army has workers. Can you imagine if North Korea announced it has developed an advanced high speed but relatively silent suicide drone (in the same egregious way it suddenly conjured monstrous ICBM and nuke warhead tech attainments just when Trump got elected promising to check China’s deindustiralisation of the West and its denuding the deplorables of earning jobs).

    The most recent sitrep with Arestovych (+ opinions about the US political situation

    The obstacle for Ukraine in getting all the arms types it wants from America lies not in US politics but in the stratagem being pursued by America’s Deep State, which means the OBJ of America as given by Lloyd Austin is not for Ukraine to win, but rather to weaken Russia. Ukraine’s objective is to win back its lost territories. I see the historical parallel as with France in WW1: revanchism. Raymond Poincaré (“In all my years at school I saw no other reason to live than the possibility of recovering our lost provinces”) became President of the Republic in 1913, his election had been helped by two million francs in Russian bribes to the French press. Poincaré anticipated war in two years and announced that his entire effort was to prepare for it. Poincaré (cousin of the superbrain phycisist) was at 20 years old the youngest lawyer in France. Arestovych and Zelensky are quite capable men and it seems they are, like Poincaré, going to get what they wanted, but at a cost they never dreamt of.

    • Replies: @LatW
    @Sean


    India is only neutral, and Russia is only the words biggest wheat exporter.
     
    Sure, but regardless of that, India doesn't want nukes to be used in this current war because the immediate effect would be starvation in India. Of potentially tens of millions. Their leadership has already voiced that they didn't like military solutions in this day and age.

    It is being done semi covertly
     
    Yea, I don't think that's great, I think countries should be open about this the way those on Ukraine's side are. Iran is not open about it, keeps denying, and, if China is the same, then whatever respect E. Europeans might have for China would be compromised.

    West bank Kherson is a nuisance rather than a prize.
     
    It's not about it being a "prize" or a "nuisance", it is occupied Ukrainian territory that needs to be recovered. Period. My point was that, if that were to happen, let's say, some time next spring, then this will have a tremendous psychological effect (even if the gains would not be critical from the pure military point of view). Imagine how this could be perceived in Russia - all this mobilization, all this effort, the dead, yet they lose Kherson.

    Ukraine is not going to let Russia stage a fighting retreat and attrite Ukraine’s precious offensive capable troops
     
    It's correct that Ukraine is trying to spare and salvage the troops right now. There is a pause right now to gather strength so there won't be any large movements now for months (even if they will continue to slowly attrite the mobiks).

    The refusal to supply Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) to Ukraine is an indication–by my way of thinking– of US aversion to Ukraine advancing much further in the South, because that would mean even without ATACMS they’d be in range for firing endless barrages of missiles from HIMARS into the Russian bases on Crimea.
     
    Right, the road to Crimea will then open. Afaik, there is some preparation to provide another type of missile, Storm Shadow or SCALP (European made) with a range of 250kms which is already quite a big range. Ideally, Ukraine should restart its own missile production (which was already going before the war).

    Can you imagine if North Korea announced it has developed an advanced high speed but relatively silent suicide drone (in the same egregious way it suddenly conjured monstrous ICBM and nuke warhead tech attainments just when Trump got elected promising to check China’s deindustiralisation of the West and its denuding the deplorables of earning jobs).
     
    Well, China already has drones and Trump should re-industrialize the US regardless if China starts producing things for this war or not. If China doesn't demonstrate good will, the US should be more strict in its domestic market at the very minimum. But as I said above, wouldn't these efforts to interfere in the war become immediately known to the world, does China really want to turn into a direct player here? I kind of doubt that's what China wants. China may come out as a winner either way, both if there was some kind of a new Minsk deal or even if Russia lost.

    The obstacle for Ukraine in getting all the arms types it wants from America lies not in US politics but in the stratagem being pursued by America’s Deep State,
     
    Correct (even though the actual US politics might matter in the future). It seems that lately Europe has picked up some slack.

    Ukraine’s objective is to win back its lost territories. I see the historical parallel as with France in WW1: revanchism.
     
    Well, unfortunately, Ukraine's situation is more dire whereas France and Germany in WW1 was more about the great power competition. Poincaré hated and mistrusted Germany, whereas Ukraine is simply defending itself from an onslaught. Ukraine is fighting not just for her independence or even the right to exist as a nationstate/country, Ukraine is in fact fighting to protect her population from genocide. If the folks here don't like this word being applied in the current context, let me just say that what is happening in the occupied areas is probably worse than what happened in the World War 2 (for gentiles). You don't just die there, you die very slowly and painfully. Not to mention you get robbed. They are just fighting to avert that for their people.

    Arestovych and Zelensky are quite capable men and it seems they are, like Poincaré, going to get what they wanted, but at a cost they never dreamt of.
     
    The price is very high, they may not recover fully, or, at least, the recovery will be tough. Arestovych is aware of it. Btw, he's also aware of the US strategy of slow deliveries. It is frustrating and they don't openly admit why these deliveries are planned out that way, but they do know. Arestovych was talking about it in one of the clips I posted (that Russia is failing faster than the US had envisioned and the US now has to come up with a short term plan for the immediate situation). They just have to work with what they have.
  834. Trotsky born in Bereslavka, Ukraine

    Jabotinsky born in Kherson, Ukraine

    Ahad Ha’am (premier cultural Zionist) born in Kiev, Ukraine.

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @Sean

    ???

    Replies: @Dmitry

    , @LatW
    @Sean

    It's not Ukraine's fault that they were born there. They may as well have been born in Russia it's just that the Tsar pushed them into Ukrainian (and Lithuanian) territory. Ukraine has been the biggest victim of Bolshevism.

  835. @Sean
    Trotsky born in Bereslavka, Ukraine

    Jabotinsky born in Kherson, Ukraine

    Ahad Ha'am (premier cultural Zionist) born in Kiev, Ukraine.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @LatW

    ???

    • Replies: @Dmitry
    @Mr. Hack

    Sean is saying because Trotsky was eventually a supporter for Ukrainian nationalism. https://www.workersliberty.org/story/2014-02-28/trotskys-1939-call-ukrainian-independence
    Although he was Bolshevik/opposed Zionism.

    Ukraine's nationalism was partly a model for Zionism. Jabotinsky was admiring Ukrainian Shevchenko and viewed it as example to follow for Zionism, which his supporters follow extreme secular nationalist version of Zionism in Palestine. Jabotinsky's essay about Shevchenko https://ru.wikisource.org/wiki/%D0%A3%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%BA_%D1%8E%D0%B1%D0%B8%D0%BB%D0%B5%D1%8F_%D0%A8%D0%B5%D0%B2%D1%87%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%BE_(%D0%96%D0%B0%D0%B1%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B9)

    Odessa is viewed as a mother of Israel because of Jabotinsky. I don't about Ha-'Am or the relation to Ukrainian nationalism. Probably there is not much connection for him.

    -

    There is surely still some small relevance of Zionism with now Ukraine. Russia is the centre of still existing Zionism in Europe (or the geographical Europe), but Ukraine is probably second centre.

    Although since February Israel is behaving like it is embarrassed about any connection to Russia and Ukraine. Postsoviet space now is enough of a disaster zone that even the Middle East is embarrassed to have any connecttion with Ukraine/Russia/Belarus. But until this year Israel's education budget was part subsidizing for Israeli technical schools in Ukraine where students would imagine they are Israelis https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r04IHpiW7-s.

  836. @Mikel
    @Barbarossa


    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urnes_Stave_Church
     
    Thanks for that link!

    Apparently, a good part of the wood has been replaced over the centuries but there are still plenty of structural elements standing since medieval times. Perhaps what makes it even more amazing is that this church is located in a very humid part of Scandinavia, next to a fjord and not far from the ocean.

    I wonder what kind of wood they used. In the Basque Country you find centuries old oak beams and posts in old buildings but I don't think there's much hardwood available in the Norwegian fjord area.

    Replies: @Barbarossa, @Philip Owen

    That said, there are oaks in Southern Norway.

    • Replies: @Barbarossa
    @Philip Owen

    I half remember reading a write up on some restoration work on one of the stave churches and I think the sill beams may have been Oak of some sort but that the rest was mostly softwood. I'd have to try to find a citation to be sure.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quercus_robur

    It looks like this would be what they would have which seems to be more like a White Oak around me which is quite rot resistant.

  837. @Sean
    @LatW


    Would Xi really be that nonchalant about this kind of a prospect?
     
    Russia would have to be in a hell of a fix to do it, and that would be obvious to the Chinese leader, who would not be nonchalant about the prospect of Russia ceasing to deter American adventurism.

    India would be faced with a major famine that could affect millions (if not tens of millions).
     

    India is only neutral, and Russia is only the words biggest wheat exporter. China produces more wheat than Russia and togetherChina and Russia can keep Idia happy and if it goes over to the US's side then it will be America's responsibility to feed. Yet in terms of food supply Russia and China are the side to be in the good books of . They are a good fit like husband and wife Russia does the military stuff deterring and distracting the US; meanwhile China cam devote a small amount of it resources to military spending (especially nuclear ) to concentrate on economic growth; the latter was the recipe for the postwar German miracle.

    Are you talking about this being done in the open or some kind of a clandestine supply route?
     
    It is being done semi covertly already because North Korea is giving Russia artillery ammunition and as NK is a Chinese sockpuppet you can bet that China is replacing those shells leaving the NK inventory for Russia. Other things such as drones and missiles might be supplied in the same way if the US was to give Ukraine longer range missiles, Abrams tanks and F16s, which it prolly will have to because the Soviet stuff and the spares to repair it is going to be gone through be sometime next year.

    If Kherson falls, the political repercussions could be severe.
     

    The city straddles the river. West bank Kherson is a nuisance rather than a prize. Ukraine is not going to let Russia stage a fighting retreat and attrite Ukraine's precious offensive capable troopss. Even if Ukraine got into West Kherson because the Russians finally withdrew across the river before it froze, as seems likely to happen, the Ukrainw would have merely freed to Russia to destroy all the bridges across the Dnipro and cripple Ukrainian logistics into East Ukraine. The refusal to supply Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) to Ukraine is an indication--by my way of thinking-- of US aversion to Ukraine advancing much further in the South, because that would mean even without ATACMS they'd be in range for firing endless barrages of missiles from HIMARS into the Russian bases on Crimea. America would rather the Ukrainians cannot do that because as soon as it can, the US would have to explicitly forbid them from doing so. That would be turning up the heat under the frog too quickly and alarm Beijing into using NK to to supply Russia with things previously withheld; China has factory complexes with more workers that the British army has workers. Can you imagine if North Korea announced it has developed an advanced high speed but relatively silent suicide drone (in the same egregious way it suddenly conjured monstrous ICBM and nuke warhead tech attainments just when Trump got elected promising to check China's deindustiralisation of the West and its denuding the deplorables of earning jobs).

    The most recent sitrep with Arestovych (+ opinions about the US political situation
     
    The obstacle for Ukraine in getting all the arms types it wants from America lies not in US politics but in the stratagem being pursued by America's Deep State, which means the OBJ of America as given by Lloyd Austin is not for Ukraine to win, but rather to weaken Russia. Ukraine's objective is to win back its lost territories. I see the historical parallel as with France in WW1: revanchism. Raymond Poincaré ("In all my years at school I saw no other reason to live than the possibility of recovering our lost provinces") became President of the Republic in 1913, his election had been helped by two million francs in Russian bribes to the French press. Poincaré anticipated war in two years and announced that his entire effort was to prepare for it. Poincaré (cousin of the superbrain phycisist) was at 20 years old the youngest lawyer in France. Arestovych and Zelensky are quite capable men and it seems they are, like Poincaré, going to get what they wanted, but at a cost they never dreamt of.

    Replies: @LatW

    India is only neutral, and Russia is only the words biggest wheat exporter.

    Sure, but regardless of that, India doesn’t want nukes to be used in this current war because the immediate effect would be starvation in India. Of potentially tens of millions. Their leadership has already voiced that they didn’t like military solutions in this day and age.

    It is being done semi covertly

    Yea, I don’t think that’s great, I think countries should be open about this the way those on Ukraine’s side are. Iran is not open about it, keeps denying, and, if China is the same, then whatever respect E. Europeans might have for China would be compromised.

    [MORE]

    West bank Kherson is a nuisance rather than a prize.

    It’s not about it being a “prize” or a “nuisance”, it is occupied Ukrainian territory that needs to be recovered. Period. My point was that, if that were to happen, let’s say, some time next spring, then this will have a tremendous psychological effect (even if the gains would not be critical from the pure military point of view). Imagine how this could be perceived in Russia – all this mobilization, all this effort, the dead, yet they lose Kherson.

    Ukraine is not going to let Russia stage a fighting retreat and attrite Ukraine’s precious offensive capable troops

    It’s correct that Ukraine is trying to spare and salvage the troops right now. There is a pause right now to gather strength so there won’t be any large movements now for months (even if they will continue to slowly attrite the mobiks).

    The refusal to supply Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) to Ukraine is an indication–by my way of thinking– of US aversion to Ukraine advancing much further in the South, because that would mean even without ATACMS they’d be in range for firing endless barrages of missiles from HIMARS into the Russian bases on Crimea.

    Right, the road to Crimea will then open. Afaik, there is some preparation to provide another type of missile, Storm Shadow or SCALP (European made) with a range of 250kms which is already quite a big range. Ideally, Ukraine should restart its own missile production (which was already going before the war).

    Can you imagine if North Korea announced it has developed an advanced high speed but relatively silent suicide drone (in the same egregious way it suddenly conjured monstrous ICBM and nuke warhead tech attainments just when Trump got elected promising to check China’s deindustiralisation of the West and its denuding the deplorables of earning jobs).

    Well, China already has drones and Trump should re-industrialize the US regardless if China starts producing things for this war or not. If China doesn’t demonstrate good will, the US should be more strict in its domestic market at the very minimum. But as I said above, wouldn’t these efforts to interfere in the war become immediately known to the world, does China really want to turn into a direct player here? I kind of doubt that’s what China wants. China may come out as a winner either way, both if there was some kind of a new Minsk deal or even if Russia lost.

    The obstacle for Ukraine in getting all the arms types it wants from America lies not in US politics but in the stratagem being pursued by America’s Deep State,

    Correct (even though the actual US politics might matter in the future). It seems that lately Europe has picked up some slack.

    Ukraine’s objective is to win back its lost territories. I see the historical parallel as with France in WW1: revanchism.

    Well, unfortunately, Ukraine’s situation is more dire whereas France and Germany in WW1 was more about the great power competition. Poincaré hated and mistrusted Germany, whereas Ukraine is simply defending itself from an onslaught. Ukraine is fighting not just for her independence or even the right to exist as a nationstate/country, Ukraine is in fact fighting to protect her population from genocide. If the folks here don’t like this word being applied in the current context, let me just say that what is happening in the occupied areas is probably worse than what happened in the World War 2 (for gentiles). You don’t just die there, you die very slowly and painfully. Not to mention you get robbed. They are just fighting to avert that for their people.

    Arestovych and Zelensky are quite capable men and it seems they are, like Poincaré, going to get what they wanted, but at a cost they never dreamt of.

    The price is very high, they may not recover fully, or, at least, the recovery will be tough. Arestovych is aware of it. Btw, he’s also aware of the US strategy of slow deliveries. It is frustrating and they don’t openly admit why these deliveries are planned out that way, but they do know. Arestovych was talking about it in one of the clips I posted (that Russia is failing faster than the US had envisioned and the US now has to come up with a short term plan for the immediate situation). They just have to work with what they have.

  838. @Sean
    Trotsky born in Bereslavka, Ukraine

    Jabotinsky born in Kherson, Ukraine

    Ahad Ha'am (premier cultural Zionist) born in Kiev, Ukraine.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack, @LatW

    It’s not Ukraine’s fault that they were born there. They may as well have been born in Russia it’s just that the Tsar pushed them into Ukrainian (and Lithuanian) territory. Ukraine has been the biggest victim of Bolshevism.

  839. @Mikel
    @Barbarossa

    I agree. It must be coniferous wood. That's what people use where it's abundant, like here in the West. Conifers also give very long straight trunks to cut good boards from.

    In more temperate climates like the Atlantic facade where I was born, hardwood is more abundant and has a very long tradition of being used not just in construction but for shipbuilding too. Transoceanic ships used to be built with beech trees from forests close to where I was born. Once properly tarred, they would last for many decades.

    Do people build with hardwood on the East Coast or do they also prefer conifers? I think you have plenty of hardwood in your forests.

    Replies: @Barbarossa

    Most of the normal residential construction around here is the typical commodity framing lumber; either Doug Fir, Hem Fir, or Southern Yellow Pine.
    With all the craziness in lumber pricing I’ve been using a lot of local material even for stud framing and sheathing. That is mostly White Pine and Hemlock.

    For the timber framing I’ve used most species available around here. Mostly I use White Pine, Hemlock, and Larch in the softwood department but I also use a lot of Red and White Oak in frames as well as things like Cherry, Ash, Beech etc. for accent woods. The Oak and other hardwoods is harder but tools very nicely and has a crisp finish plus some nice color/ grain.

    We do have a lot of hardwoods here. The state planted vast plantations of softwood when they bought up farmland in the 30’s and 50’s so much of what I’m using for timbers comes from that stock, but most of that goes back into hardwoods eventually.

    Transoceanic ships used to be built with beech trees from forests close to where I was born. Once properly tarred, they would last for many decades.

    That is interesting since Beech has a very low rot resistance, but the tarring would make a great difference there. Around here a lot of old frames from the 19th century have a fair bit of Beech and Maple but they often have a lot of powder post beetle damage. I actually just replaced a 16′ section of Beech sill beam on the oldest part of the rental house next to my shop which is from the 1850’s. I was surprised that it was Beech, but I suppose if it lasted 150 years that’s not too bad!

    • Replies: @Mikel
    @Barbarossa


    Beech has a very low rot resistance
     
    That makes me wonder if my father was wrong then and it was oaks what they harvested for the shipyards. It's possible but beech trees are much more abundant. The natural vegetation close to the Atlantic in temperate Europe is basically a beech forest with some other deciduous species interspersed, such as oak, ash and maple. These are much less abundant, which is why I guess the Druids considered oaks to be sacred.

    They did use oak for buildings, definitely, but my father talked about an old tradition of local forests being conserved and replanted after each harvest for the shipyards so I assumed it was beech wood.
  840. @Philip Owen
    @Mikel

    That said, there are oaks in Southern Norway.

    Replies: @Barbarossa

    I half remember reading a write up on some restoration work on one of the stave churches and I think the sill beams may have been Oak of some sort but that the rest was mostly softwood. I’d have to try to find a citation to be sure.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quercus_robur

    It looks like this would be what they would have which seems to be more like a White Oak around me which is quite rot resistant.

  841. @Dmitry
    @Barbarossa

    He said trojan and rootkit. To have those on your computer, you would need to open a file (like an email attachment or from a website). So, if you think, Bashibuzuk can be a Machiavellian hacker, sending those kind of attachments in emails to us or engineering people to his websites to open them, while pretending to be innocent about modern technology.

    AltanBakshi and Bashibuzuk/Anon4 are some of the more interesting users in the forum, which we always have the most esoteric topics and discussions. We should sponsor for them to buy an antivirus, if this is condition for them to continue to post in the forum without believing they are hacking each other. Something like "Malwarebytes Premium" would stop them from downloading most malware.

    Replies: @Barbarossa

    Oh, I don’t think that Bashi is guilty of any Machiavellian hacking at all. I’d actually be more than happy to pay for Bashibuzuk’s anti-virus for a year. Sadly it seems that Bashibuzuk has vamoosed for the time being. Hopefully he’ll be back.

  842. @LatW
    @Dmitry


    Lol you don’t need to be easily trolled.
     
    It was pretty bad and he doesn't deserve such stupid accusations. :( But what he needs to understand is that attractive people who stand out often get harassed, including online. This happens, strangers call you out of the blue, send you pics you didn't ask for, and, if you reject them, they will come and accuse you of crazy things. It's what happens when you are popular.

    Replies: @Dmitry

    From my memory, AltanBakshi and Bashibuzuk/Anon4 did not seem bad with each other. I had thought them as a pair because they were significantly replying to each other.

    If it was management decisions, you could have added them on a team together. But remember all those hours, they were arguing about religion which can be a personal/triggering topic.

    AltanBakshi says that Bashibuzuk/Anon4 writes nationalist views, or said he likes Hitler, which are not matching Buddhism. At the same time, he writes that Bashibuzuk says to AltanBakshi that he follows Buddhism. So, this must be how the disagreement between them began.

    Especially with internet forums, you don’t really know when you are stand on someone’s sore areas. I remember Bashibuzuk writing unpredictably angry with me when I posted a joke and video about Yeltsin centre (a community centre in Russia named for the “democratic” president). Mikel was becoming crazy and delusional when I said something about Mormons. Even I have some kind of limit for number of posts from AP I can read, with no offense for AP who I hope will be here again with us soon.

    • Replies: @LatW
    @Dmitry


    From my memory, AltanBakshi and Bashibuzuk/Anon4 did not seem bad with each other. I had thought them as a pair because they were significantly replying to each other.
     
    It's not Altan, and, yes, from what I recall, they hit it off well, but argued about religion (Bashi is a free-thinker who is not dogmatic so what do you expect). What really ticked me off about Altan was his aggression towards Russia's Western neighbors and Ukraine. He straight up supported the invasion. I remember Bashi actually asked him why he was so "blood thirsty". It's a big pet peeve of mine when Russian minorities espouse those kinds of views, hiding behind the Slav's back.

    AltanBakshi says that Bashibuzuk/Anon4 writes nationalist views, or said he likes Hitler, which are not matching Buddhism. At the same time, he writes that Bashibuzuk says to AltanBakshi that he follows Buddhism. So, this must be how the disagreement between them began.
     
    There used to be esoteric Hitlerism which Bashi might have found interesting (I took great interest in Savitri Devi when I was young, I'm sure he did, too). Bashi has ethnonat tendencies (not fully but to a significant extent, quite tangible) so it's normal he sympathizes with things such as РОА but Altan was more "Sovok" and, because of who he is, cannot relate to European style ethno-nationalism at all, so to him that was "allergic".

    I remember Bashibuzuk writing unpredictably angry with me when I posted a joke and video about Yeltsin centre (a community centre in Russia named for the “democratic” president).
     
    Because that institution is too liberal for his taste and is a symbol of corruption in his view. Nothing unpredictable there at all.

    Even I have some kind of limit for number of posts from AP I can read

     

    AP is very radical in some ways, but very liberal in others. Depending where it suits him. I would never argue with AP because 1) I don't care enough about the fundy stuff he says (nobody's cancelling mass education anytime soon and, if someone believes the revolution happened out of the blue, then you can't convince them anyway) and 2) he is a supporter of PLC and I would never openly oppose someone like that. But I can totally see how someone like you can have issues with some of his views. You're very patient, I've never seen you blow up. :)

    Replies: @Dmitry, @Mikel

    , @Mikel
    @Dmitry


    Mikel was becoming crazy and delusional when I said something about Mormons.
     
    You did clumsily step on a sore thumb there but you know that's not what happened at all. I wouldn't have cared your criticizing Mormons ("Morons", as some non-religious Utahns call them) but only when you started talking about weird fantasies of "old men marrying 50 teenage wives each" etc I felt the need to put a stop to all that nonsense.

    I know that you took my correcting your false claims very personally but you should let it go. In spite of your occasional bizarre claims, I don't have any animosity towards you. Even though we come from totally different parts of Europe, I think we both had very similar experiences in our teenage years discovering a much more advanced and interesting world than our provincial hometowns during our summers in London.
  843. @Dmitry
    @LatW

    From my memory, AltanBakshi and Bashibuzuk/Anon4 did not seem bad with each other. I had thought them as a pair because they were significantly replying to each other.

    If it was management decisions, you could have added them on a team together. But remember all those hours, they were arguing about religion which can be a personal/triggering topic.

    AltanBakshi says that Bashibuzuk/Anon4 writes nationalist views, or said he likes Hitler, which are not matching Buddhism. At the same time, he writes that Bashibuzuk says to AltanBakshi that he follows Buddhism. So, this must be how the disagreement between them began.

    Especially with internet forums, you don't really know when you are stand on someone's sore areas. I remember Bashibuzuk writing unpredictably angry with me when I posted a joke and video about Yeltsin centre (a community centre in Russia named for the "democratic" president). Mikel was becoming crazy and delusional when I said something about Mormons. Even I have some kind of limit for number of posts from AP I can read, with no offense for AP who I hope will be here again with us soon.

    Replies: @LatW, @Mikel

    From my memory, AltanBakshi and Bashibuzuk/Anon4 did not seem bad with each other. I had thought them as a pair because they were significantly replying to each other.

    It’s not Altan, and, yes, from what I recall, they hit it off well, but argued about religion (Bashi is a free-thinker who is not dogmatic so what do you expect). What really ticked me off about Altan was his aggression towards Russia’s Western neighbors and Ukraine. He straight up supported the invasion. I remember Bashi actually asked him why he was so “blood thirsty”. It’s a big pet peeve of mine when Russian minorities espouse those kinds of views, hiding behind the Slav’s back.

    [MORE]

    AltanBakshi says that Bashibuzuk/Anon4 writes nationalist views, or said he likes Hitler, which are not matching Buddhism. At the same time, he writes that Bashibuzuk says to AltanBakshi that he follows Buddhism. So, this must be how the disagreement between them began.

    There used to be esoteric Hitlerism which Bashi might have found interesting (I took great interest in Savitri Devi when I was young, I’m sure he did, too). Bashi has ethnonat tendencies (not fully but to a significant extent, quite tangible) so it’s normal he sympathizes with things such as РОА but Altan was more “Sovok” and, because of who he is, cannot relate to European style ethno-nationalism at all, so to him that was “allergic”.

    I remember Bashibuzuk writing unpredictably angry with me when I posted a joke and video about Yeltsin centre (a community centre in Russia named for the “democratic” president).

    Because that institution is too liberal for his taste and is a symbol of corruption in his view. Nothing unpredictable there at all.

    Even I have some kind of limit for number of posts from AP I can read

    AP is very radical in some ways, but very liberal in others. Depending where it suits him. I would never argue with AP because 1) I don’t care enough about the fundy stuff he says (nobody’s cancelling mass education anytime soon and, if someone believes the revolution happened out of the blue, then you can’t convince them anyway) and 2) he is a supporter of PLC and I would never openly oppose someone like that. But I can totally see how someone like you can have issues with some of his views. You’re very patient, I’ve never seen you blow up. 🙂

    • Replies: @Dmitry
    @LatW


    Because that institution is too liberal for his taste and is a symbol of corruption in his view. Nothing unpredictable there at all.

     

    Yes sure there this bit of stupid internet culture about where it is promoted as something by government for patriots to hate. Apart from a museum which has propaganda, it's mainly community centre for the local people. It's a place for the events like concerts. When pop singers like Klava Koka will sing for kids, then her concert would be there. It's the same as every Lenin street in Russia are mostly used like any boring road.

    If I remember, I was writing a sarcastic joke about their promotional video for the 1990s, which has triggered Bashibuzuk. It was unpredictable reaction of course, as I was joking about the video, not supporting its ideological content (the museum contains some propaganda, which I would be sceptical about). Moreover, he knows my views are not unsceptical about our politicians or I am not a great supporter of government suppressing protests with violence, police brutality etc.

    But this the part of life in the internet forum - we don't know our colleague netizens' sensitive areas as we only meet interesting but a little restricted way. So, we sometimes step on those sensitive points.

    My guess, is Bashibuzuk has stood on one of Altan's sensitive areas like this. AltanBakshi was one of the best commentators here. But it seems in the end they have some conflict https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-151/#comment-4699368


    how someone like you can have issues with some of his views. You’re very patient, I’ve never seen you blow up.
     
    Lol you are Soviet people here, born in the USSR. I was born in the Russian Federation. Technically, AP is insulting you, more than he is insulting me.

    I guess it's like I was the only person stupid enough here to use energy to write posts to defend Ukraine from fake news, when all the other's don't care. https://www.unz.com/akarlin/ukraine-returns-to-tradition/#comment-3898004 Even though my response to Ukraine, and Ukraine's response to me, would be to try to be as distant from each as possible.

    Replies: @LatW, @Mr. Hack

    , @Mikel
    @LatW


    He straight up supported the invasion.
     
    Didn't Altan disappear from Unz long before the Russian invasion?

    Replies: @LatW

  844. @Mr. Hack
    @Sean

    ???

    Replies: @Dmitry

    Sean is saying because Trotsky was eventually a supporter for Ukrainian nationalism. https://www.workersliberty.org/story/2014-02-28/trotskys-1939-call-ukrainian-independence
    Although he was Bolshevik/opposed Zionism.

    Ukraine’s nationalism was partly a model for Zionism. Jabotinsky was admiring Ukrainian Shevchenko and viewed it as example to follow for Zionism, which his supporters follow extreme secular nationalist version of Zionism in Palestine. Jabotinsky’s essay about Shevchenko https://ru.wikisource.org/wiki/%D0%A3%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%BA_%D1%8E%D0%B1%D0%B8%D0%BB%D0%B5%D1%8F_%D0%A8%D0%B5%D0%B2%D1%87%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%BE_(%D0%96%D0%B0%D0%B1%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B9)

    Odessa is viewed as a mother of Israel because of Jabotinsky. I don’t about Ha-‘Am or the relation to Ukrainian nationalism. Probably there is not much connection for him.

    There is surely still some small relevance of Zionism with now Ukraine. Russia is the centre of still existing Zionism in Europe (or the geographical Europe), but Ukraine is probably second centre.

    Although since February Israel is behaving like it is embarrassed about any connection to Russia and Ukraine. Postsoviet space now is enough of a disaster zone that even the Middle East is embarrassed to have any connecttion with Ukraine/Russia/Belarus. But until this year Israel’s education budget was part subsidizing for Israeli technical schools in Ukraine where students would imagine they are Israelis https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r04IHpiW7-s.

    • Thanks: Mr. Hack
  845. @LatW
    @Dmitry


    From my memory, AltanBakshi and Bashibuzuk/Anon4 did not seem bad with each other. I had thought them as a pair because they were significantly replying to each other.
     
    It's not Altan, and, yes, from what I recall, they hit it off well, but argued about religion (Bashi is a free-thinker who is not dogmatic so what do you expect). What really ticked me off about Altan was his aggression towards Russia's Western neighbors and Ukraine. He straight up supported the invasion. I remember Bashi actually asked him why he was so "blood thirsty". It's a big pet peeve of mine when Russian minorities espouse those kinds of views, hiding behind the Slav's back.

    AltanBakshi says that Bashibuzuk/Anon4 writes nationalist views, or said he likes Hitler, which are not matching Buddhism. At the same time, he writes that Bashibuzuk says to AltanBakshi that he follows Buddhism. So, this must be how the disagreement between them began.
     
    There used to be esoteric Hitlerism which Bashi might have found interesting (I took great interest in Savitri Devi when I was young, I'm sure he did, too). Bashi has ethnonat tendencies (not fully but to a significant extent, quite tangible) so it's normal he sympathizes with things such as РОА but Altan was more "Sovok" and, because of who he is, cannot relate to European style ethno-nationalism at all, so to him that was "allergic".

    I remember Bashibuzuk writing unpredictably angry with me when I posted a joke and video about Yeltsin centre (a community centre in Russia named for the “democratic” president).
     
    Because that institution is too liberal for his taste and is a symbol of corruption in his view. Nothing unpredictable there at all.

    Even I have some kind of limit for number of posts from AP I can read

     

    AP is very radical in some ways, but very liberal in others. Depending where it suits him. I would never argue with AP because 1) I don't care enough about the fundy stuff he says (nobody's cancelling mass education anytime soon and, if someone believes the revolution happened out of the blue, then you can't convince them anyway) and 2) he is a supporter of PLC and I would never openly oppose someone like that. But I can totally see how someone like you can have issues with some of his views. You're very patient, I've never seen you blow up. :)

    Replies: @Dmitry, @Mikel

    Because that institution is too liberal for his taste and is a symbol of corruption in his view. Nothing unpredictable there at all.

    Yes sure there this bit of stupid internet culture about where it is promoted as something by government for patriots to hate. Apart from a museum which has propaganda, it’s mainly community centre for the local people. It’s a place for the events like concerts. When pop singers like Klava Koka will sing for kids, then her concert would be there. It’s the same as every Lenin street in Russia are mostly used like any boring road.

    If I remember, I was writing a sarcastic joke about their promotional video for the 1990s, which has triggered Bashibuzuk. It was unpredictable reaction of course, as I was joking about the video, not supporting its ideological content (the museum contains some propaganda, which I would be sceptical about). Moreover, he knows my views are not unsceptical about our politicians or I am not a great supporter of government suppressing protests with violence, police brutality etc.

    But this the part of life in the internet forum – we don’t know our colleague netizens’ sensitive areas as we only meet interesting but a little restricted way. So, we sometimes step on those sensitive points.

    My guess, is Bashibuzuk has stood on one of Altan’s sensitive areas like this. AltanBakshi was one of the best commentators here. But it seems in the end they have some conflict https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-151/#comment-4699368

    how someone like you can have issues with some of his views. You’re very patient, I’ve never seen you blow up.

    Lol you are Soviet people here, born in the USSR. I was born in the Russian Federation. Technically, AP is insulting you, more than he is insulting me.

    I guess it’s like I was the only person stupid enough here to use energy to write posts to defend Ukraine from fake news, when all the other’s don’t care. https://www.unz.com/akarlin/ukraine-returns-to-tradition/#comment-3898004 Even though my response to Ukraine, and Ukraine’s response to me, would be to try to be as distant from each as possible.

    • Replies: @LatW
    @Dmitry


    Apart from a museum which has propaganda, it’s mainly community centre for the local people. It’s a place for the events like concerts.
     
    Yea, I remember that one really cool avant-garde fashion show was staged in the Yeltsin center. I'm sure some of those events would be considered "degenerate" by nationalists (or "patriots" as they're called in Russia).

    It’s the same as every Lenin street in Russia are mostly used like any boring road.
     

    I'm not sure about that, my guess is they mostly host liberals. Maybe they do it deliberately?

    When pop singers like Klava Koka will sing for kids, then her concert would be there
     
    Well, exactly. Klava Koka is very decadent. Not sure she should be singing for kids. She has songs about collecting boyfriends which may be hilarious for grown women, but maybe not for young girls.

    If I remember, I was writing a sarcastic joke about their promotional video for the 1990s, which has triggered Bashibuzuk.
     
    Well, yea, because he hated those events of 1994 where Yeltsin stomped out the patriotic forces of Russia.

    AltanBakshi was one of the best commentators here. But it seems in the end they have some conflict
     
    Because Altan couldn't accept any criticism of Putinism.

    Lol you are Soviet people here, born in the USSR.
     
    Well, just because someone was physically born in the USSR doesn't mean they're a Soviet person. Here I do not agree with AP (or you, if you believe so). People like me or Bashi are not really "Soviet people". I have the impression that you (and other Russians ) stand up for the SU way more than I do.
    I will not defend the SU, but I also don't like it when open lies or stereotypes about the SU are spread. Especially when innocent people are trashed. And I don't care about AP's insults because I am above that and he is very subjective. I'm not that fixated on that period.

    Most of my schooling was not even in the SU, and even as a child, I was heavily influenced by older family members who had very strong roots in the pre-1940s culture (and even before that). For example, one of my older relatives had a condo in the center of Riga that had a huge bookshelf filled with books from 1920-30s and books in German from the late 19th century. Later my aunt inherited this condo, with the bookshelf and we spent a lot of time there. Not in some Soviet bootcamp, lol. Btw, not a single one of my grandparents spoke Russian and no one was in the Communist party. It also feels that many in the parents' generation started floating away already in the late 70s and 80s, a lot of them started worshipping the West. It was the same in Russia. That culture was imposed on them so they gravitated to the West partly out of protest, probably.

    What about you, how come you know so much about the time that existed before you? I feel kind of bad for you, you didn't get to experience a lot of the good period. There were some good times in the 80s, even 90s and 2000s. You must've just really experienced the 2000s. It was a kind of a long lull of carelessness and now the situation is not that great. You deserved to experience more of this less aggressive and more conflict-free period.

    Replies: @Dmitry

    , @Mr. Hack
    @Dmitry


    I guess it’s like I was the only person stupid enough here to use energy to write posts to defend Ukraine from fake news, when all the other’s don’t care.
     
    I'm not quite following?...

    Even I have some kind of limit for number of posts from AP I can read, with no offense for AP who I hope will be here again with us soon.
     
    Well, I think that he may not be in any hurry to return, when even one of his very favorite posters here (you) has been actually somewhat cavalier in your criticisms of him here, shall we say over the last couple of months (there have definitely been some doozeys, I would say)? Like this recent one:

    That is because of falling to a dialogue with crazy views of the user AP.

     

    Replies: @Dmitry

  846. @Dmitry
    @LatW


    Because that institution is too liberal for his taste and is a symbol of corruption in his view. Nothing unpredictable there at all.

     

    Yes sure there this bit of stupid internet culture about where it is promoted as something by government for patriots to hate. Apart from a museum which has propaganda, it's mainly community centre for the local people. It's a place for the events like concerts. When pop singers like Klava Koka will sing for kids, then her concert would be there. It's the same as every Lenin street in Russia are mostly used like any boring road.

    If I remember, I was writing a sarcastic joke about their promotional video for the 1990s, which has triggered Bashibuzuk. It was unpredictable reaction of course, as I was joking about the video, not supporting its ideological content (the museum contains some propaganda, which I would be sceptical about). Moreover, he knows my views are not unsceptical about our politicians or I am not a great supporter of government suppressing protests with violence, police brutality etc.

    But this the part of life in the internet forum - we don't know our colleague netizens' sensitive areas as we only meet interesting but a little restricted way. So, we sometimes step on those sensitive points.

    My guess, is Bashibuzuk has stood on one of Altan's sensitive areas like this. AltanBakshi was one of the best commentators here. But it seems in the end they have some conflict https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-151/#comment-4699368


    how someone like you can have issues with some of his views. You’re very patient, I’ve never seen you blow up.
     
    Lol you are Soviet people here, born in the USSR. I was born in the Russian Federation. Technically, AP is insulting you, more than he is insulting me.

    I guess it's like I was the only person stupid enough here to use energy to write posts to defend Ukraine from fake news, when all the other's don't care. https://www.unz.com/akarlin/ukraine-returns-to-tradition/#comment-3898004 Even though my response to Ukraine, and Ukraine's response to me, would be to try to be as distant from each as possible.

    Replies: @LatW, @Mr. Hack

    Apart from a museum which has propaganda, it’s mainly community centre for the local people. It’s a place for the events like concerts.

    Yea, I remember that one really cool avant-garde fashion show was staged in the Yeltsin center. I’m sure some of those events would be considered “degenerate” by nationalists (or “patriots” as they’re called in Russia).

    [MORE]

    It’s the same as every Lenin street in Russia are mostly used like any boring road.

    I’m not sure about that, my guess is they mostly host liberals. Maybe they do it deliberately?

    When pop singers like Klava Koka will sing for kids, then her concert would be there

    Well, exactly. Klava Koka is very decadent. Not sure she should be singing for kids. She has songs about collecting boyfriends which may be hilarious for grown women, but maybe not for young girls.

    If I remember, I was writing a sarcastic joke about their promotional video for the 1990s, which has triggered Bashibuzuk.

    Well, yea, because he hated those events of 1994 where Yeltsin stomped out the patriotic forces of Russia.

    AltanBakshi was one of the best commentators here. But it seems in the end they have some conflict

    Because Altan couldn’t accept any criticism of Putinism.

    Lol you are Soviet people here, born in the USSR.

    Well, just because someone was physically born in the USSR doesn’t mean they’re a Soviet person. Here I do not agree with AP (or you, if you believe so). People like me or Bashi are not really “Soviet people”. I have the impression that you (and other Russians ) stand up for the SU way more than I do.
    I will not defend the SU, but I also don’t like it when open lies or stereotypes about the SU are spread. Especially when innocent people are trashed. And I don’t care about AP’s insults because I am above that and he is very subjective. I’m not that fixated on that period.

    Most of my schooling was not even in the SU, and even as a child, I was heavily influenced by older family members who had very strong roots in the pre-1940s culture (and even before that). For example, one of my older relatives had a condo in the center of Riga that had a huge bookshelf filled with books from 1920-30s and books in German from the late 19th century. Later my aunt inherited this condo, with the bookshelf and we spent a lot of time there. Not in some Soviet bootcamp, lol. Btw, not a single one of my grandparents spoke Russian and no one was in the Communist party. It also feels that many in the parents’ generation started floating away already in the late 70s and 80s, a lot of them started worshipping the West. It was the same in Russia. That culture was imposed on them so they gravitated to the West partly out of protest, probably.

    What about you, how come you know so much about the time that existed before you? I feel kind of bad for you, you didn’t get to experience a lot of the good period. There were some good times in the 80s, even 90s and 2000s. You must’ve just really experienced the 2000s. It was a kind of a long lull of carelessness and now the situation is not that great. You deserved to experience more of this less aggressive and more conflict-free period.

    • Replies: @Dmitry
    @LatW


    by nationalists (or “patriots” as they’re called in Russia
     
    You know it is mostly theatre. Like "Good cop, bad cop". As for "patriots", the nowadays descriptions could be "imperialists".

    sure about that, my guess is they mostly host liberals.
     
    As you know, it's confusing in English, as liberal has a bit different meaning in postsoviet Russia. It's like people with "Western" political clothes. Not necessarily so "pro-democracy", as some of the most powerful liberals have not exactly protesting certain action of the governments, which they are some of the most important supporters for and its collaborators.

    As for the culture events there, it's like 90% classical music. https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLFaXVYO8yQ2J0R1hD4MrLyaIcU-pRw_fv.


    Klava Koka is very decadent
     
    When they say in Russia it is so intolerant for the LGBT culture and the male dancing in Kremlin's concert hall is like. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INKXoQuZb_U.

    AP’s insults because I am above that and he is very subjective.

     

    You cannot escape the responsibly so easy. As Latvian you are punished by God more than Russians, according to the raingod theology. But somehow despite creating supposedly the October revolution, Latvia becomes one of the few developed, peaceful postsoviet countries in the 21st century. If he was logical to derive from result backwards, it would look like the raingod in 1917 was supporting the Baltic shooters. https://www.unz.com/akarlin/sixth-proof/#comment-3206911

    culture was imposed on them so they gravitated to the West partly out of protest, probably
     
    Well, when the natural culture there should probably be Scandinavia, not completely unattractive as a concept.

    What about you, how come you know so much about the time that existed before you? I feel kind of bad
     
    I feel like somekind of emigrant from the 1970s as much of the people of my time. I guess perhaps because the local things when I was a child were mostly from the 1970s/1980s. There was a lot of more recent things, whether from culture or objects, but the new replacement culture was from the West in origin. So, there is the local culture including the material culture which is fixed earlier and the newer things (including material culture) are arriving from the West and not native plants.

    You deserved to experience more of this less aggressive and more conflict-free period.
     
    We are all lucky in the forum I'm pretty sure. You can see by the small things everyone complains about. The people which need the sympathy deserved another experience, probably are/were in Mariupol.

    Replies: @LatW

  847. @Emil Nikola Richard
    @Thulean Friend

    Kanye West is so stinking rich he bangs Kardashians.

    Sympathy for such an individual is an indication you need to get a life. If you or I had 1/20th of his dough we could be living in a nice house in a nice neighborhood minding our own business and not one single human on the planet need give two cents regarding anything about either of us for perpetuity.

    Replies: @Thulean Friend

    Imagine being so stupid that you think this about Kanye’s personal life rather what it says about power in America.

    Lol, I should start to treat this blog as only a form of entertainment given the stupidity on display here.

  848. @Barbarossa
    @Mikel

    Most of the normal residential construction around here is the typical commodity framing lumber; either Doug Fir, Hem Fir, or Southern Yellow Pine.
    With all the craziness in lumber pricing I've been using a lot of local material even for stud framing and sheathing. That is mostly White Pine and Hemlock.

    For the timber framing I've used most species available around here. Mostly I use White Pine, Hemlock, and Larch in the softwood department but I also use a lot of Red and White Oak in frames as well as things like Cherry, Ash, Beech etc. for accent woods. The Oak and other hardwoods is harder but tools very nicely and has a crisp finish plus some nice color/ grain.

    We do have a lot of hardwoods here. The state planted vast plantations of softwood when they bought up farmland in the 30's and 50's so much of what I'm using for timbers comes from that stock, but most of that goes back into hardwoods eventually.


    Transoceanic ships used to be built with beech trees from forests close to where I was born. Once properly tarred, they would last for many decades.
     
    That is interesting since Beech has a very low rot resistance, but the tarring would make a great difference there. Around here a lot of old frames from the 19th century have a fair bit of Beech and Maple but they often have a lot of powder post beetle damage. I actually just replaced a 16' section of Beech sill beam on the oldest part of the rental house next to my shop which is from the 1850's. I was surprised that it was Beech, but I suppose if it lasted 150 years that's not too bad!

    Replies: @Mikel

    Beech has a very low rot resistance

    That makes me wonder if my father was wrong then and it was oaks what they harvested for the shipyards. It’s possible but beech trees are much more abundant. The natural vegetation close to the Atlantic in temperate Europe is basically a beech forest with some other deciduous species interspersed, such as oak, ash and maple. These are much less abundant, which is why I guess the Druids considered oaks to be sacred.

    They did use oak for buildings, definitely, but my father talked about an old tradition of local forests being conserved and replanted after each harvest for the shipyards so I assumed it was beech wood.

  849. @Dmitry
    @LatW


    Because that institution is too liberal for his taste and is a symbol of corruption in his view. Nothing unpredictable there at all.

     

    Yes sure there this bit of stupid internet culture about where it is promoted as something by government for patriots to hate. Apart from a museum which has propaganda, it's mainly community centre for the local people. It's a place for the events like concerts. When pop singers like Klava Koka will sing for kids, then her concert would be there. It's the same as every Lenin street in Russia are mostly used like any boring road.

    If I remember, I was writing a sarcastic joke about their promotional video for the 1990s, which has triggered Bashibuzuk. It was unpredictable reaction of course, as I was joking about the video, not supporting its ideological content (the museum contains some propaganda, which I would be sceptical about). Moreover, he knows my views are not unsceptical about our politicians or I am not a great supporter of government suppressing protests with violence, police brutality etc.

    But this the part of life in the internet forum - we don't know our colleague netizens' sensitive areas as we only meet interesting but a little restricted way. So, we sometimes step on those sensitive points.

    My guess, is Bashibuzuk has stood on one of Altan's sensitive areas like this. AltanBakshi was one of the best commentators here. But it seems in the end they have some conflict https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-151/#comment-4699368


    how someone like you can have issues with some of his views. You’re very patient, I’ve never seen you blow up.
     
    Lol you are Soviet people here, born in the USSR. I was born in the Russian Federation. Technically, AP is insulting you, more than he is insulting me.

    I guess it's like I was the only person stupid enough here to use energy to write posts to defend Ukraine from fake news, when all the other's don't care. https://www.unz.com/akarlin/ukraine-returns-to-tradition/#comment-3898004 Even though my response to Ukraine, and Ukraine's response to me, would be to try to be as distant from each as possible.

    Replies: @LatW, @Mr. Hack

    I guess it’s like I was the only person stupid enough here to use energy to write posts to defend Ukraine from fake news, when all the other’s don’t care.

    I’m not quite following?…

    Even I have some kind of limit for number of posts from AP I can read, with no offense for AP who I hope will be here again with us soon.

    Well, I think that he may not be in any hurry to return, when even one of his very favorite posters here (you) has been actually somewhat cavalier in your criticisms of him here, shall we say over the last couple of months (there have definitely been some doozeys, I would say)? Like this recent one:

    That is because of falling to a dialogue with crazy views of the user AP.

    • Replies: @Dmitry
    @Mr. Hack

    I like AP a lot (well to extent of internet forums) which is why I feel sad when he was recently repeating all his worst "teaching" with Here Be Dragon, which I felt like he would have developed beyond, especially after the events this year.

    You know the war in Ukraine might have changed his "unusual" views or made given a sense of humanism. But it seems like the opposite.

    Perhaps it's just me, but I felt often there is a sign of flexibility and dialogue with his "unusual" views, which is probably what motivates people to criticize them.

    You can see in the recent posts I was to trying to see if I could direct him read Ignatius of Loyola, Thomas Kempis, or Bible, to read the teaching of Jesus. My posts could be too incompatible, but if we can direct him to read famous people of the past.

    The time you learn something in the forum, is usually not from reading another's post, but possibly from what they could direct you to. You know Sean's post above was the last time I learned something here about history, because Sean directed to learn how Revisionist Zionist was inspired partly by the Ukrainian nationalism. I would usually have expected Polish nationalism. But the influence of Ukrainian nationalism is written by Jabotinsky. But Sean just wrote the hint for us to study.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

  850. @Dmitry
    @LatW

    From my memory, AltanBakshi and Bashibuzuk/Anon4 did not seem bad with each other. I had thought them as a pair because they were significantly replying to each other.

    If it was management decisions, you could have added them on a team together. But remember all those hours, they were arguing about religion which can be a personal/triggering topic.

    AltanBakshi says that Bashibuzuk/Anon4 writes nationalist views, or said he likes Hitler, which are not matching Buddhism. At the same time, he writes that Bashibuzuk says to AltanBakshi that he follows Buddhism. So, this must be how the disagreement between them began.

    Especially with internet forums, you don't really know when you are stand on someone's sore areas. I remember Bashibuzuk writing unpredictably angry with me when I posted a joke and video about Yeltsin centre (a community centre in Russia named for the "democratic" president). Mikel was becoming crazy and delusional when I said something about Mormons. Even I have some kind of limit for number of posts from AP I can read, with no offense for AP who I hope will be here again with us soon.

    Replies: @LatW, @Mikel

    Mikel was becoming crazy and delusional when I said something about Mormons.

    You did clumsily step on a sore thumb there but you know that’s not what happened at all. I wouldn’t have cared your criticizing Mormons (“Morons”, as some non-religious Utahns call them) but only when you started talking about weird fantasies of “old men marrying 50 teenage wives each” etc I felt the need to put a stop to all that nonsense.

    I know that you took my correcting your false claims very personally but you should let it go. In spite of your occasional bizarre claims, I don’t have any animosity towards you. Even though we come from totally different parts of Europe, I think we both had very similar experiences in our teenage years discovering a much more advanced and interesting world than our provincial hometowns during our summers in London.

  851. @LatW
    @Dmitry


    From my memory, AltanBakshi and Bashibuzuk/Anon4 did not seem bad with each other. I had thought them as a pair because they were significantly replying to each other.
     
    It's not Altan, and, yes, from what I recall, they hit it off well, but argued about religion (Bashi is a free-thinker who is not dogmatic so what do you expect). What really ticked me off about Altan was his aggression towards Russia's Western neighbors and Ukraine. He straight up supported the invasion. I remember Bashi actually asked him why he was so "blood thirsty". It's a big pet peeve of mine when Russian minorities espouse those kinds of views, hiding behind the Slav's back.

    AltanBakshi says that Bashibuzuk/Anon4 writes nationalist views, or said he likes Hitler, which are not matching Buddhism. At the same time, he writes that Bashibuzuk says to AltanBakshi that he follows Buddhism. So, this must be how the disagreement between them began.
     
    There used to be esoteric Hitlerism which Bashi might have found interesting (I took great interest in Savitri Devi when I was young, I'm sure he did, too). Bashi has ethnonat tendencies (not fully but to a significant extent, quite tangible) so it's normal he sympathizes with things such as РОА but Altan was more "Sovok" and, because of who he is, cannot relate to European style ethno-nationalism at all, so to him that was "allergic".

    I remember Bashibuzuk writing unpredictably angry with me when I posted a joke and video about Yeltsin centre (a community centre in Russia named for the “democratic” president).
     
    Because that institution is too liberal for his taste and is a symbol of corruption in his view. Nothing unpredictable there at all.

    Even I have some kind of limit for number of posts from AP I can read

     

    AP is very radical in some ways, but very liberal in others. Depending where it suits him. I would never argue with AP because 1) I don't care enough about the fundy stuff he says (nobody's cancelling mass education anytime soon and, if someone believes the revolution happened out of the blue, then you can't convince them anyway) and 2) he is a supporter of PLC and I would never openly oppose someone like that. But I can totally see how someone like you can have issues with some of his views. You're very patient, I've never seen you blow up. :)

    Replies: @Dmitry, @Mikel

    He straight up supported the invasion.

    Didn’t Altan disappear from Unz long before the Russian invasion?

    • Replies: @LatW
    @Mikel

    His aggressive rhetoric and condescending attitude towards Russia's neighbors simply means that he is probably ok with a "special operation". We remember everything.

  852. @Mikel
    @LatW


    He straight up supported the invasion.
     
    Didn't Altan disappear from Unz long before the Russian invasion?

    Replies: @LatW

    His aggressive rhetoric and condescending attitude towards Russia’s neighbors simply means that he is probably ok with a “special operation”. We remember everything.

  853. @Mr. Hack
    @Dmitry


    I guess it’s like I was the only person stupid enough here to use energy to write posts to defend Ukraine from fake news, when all the other’s don’t care.
     
    I'm not quite following?...

    Even I have some kind of limit for number of posts from AP I can read, with no offense for AP who I hope will be here again with us soon.
     
    Well, I think that he may not be in any hurry to return, when even one of his very favorite posters here (you) has been actually somewhat cavalier in your criticisms of him here, shall we say over the last couple of months (there have definitely been some doozeys, I would say)? Like this recent one:

    That is because of falling to a dialogue with crazy views of the user AP.

     

    Replies: @Dmitry

    I like AP a lot (well to extent of internet forums) which is why I feel sad when he was recently repeating all his worst “teaching” with Here Be Dragon, which I felt like he would have developed beyond, especially after the events this year.

    You know the war in Ukraine might have changed his “unusual” views or made given a sense of humanism. But it seems like the opposite.

    Perhaps it’s just me, but I felt often there is a sign of flexibility and dialogue with his “unusual” views, which is probably what motivates people to criticize them.

    You can see in the recent posts I was to trying to see if I could direct him read Ignatius of Loyola, Thomas Kempis, or Bible, to read the teaching of Jesus. My posts could be too incompatible, but if we can direct him to read famous people of the past.

    The time you learn something in the forum, is usually not from reading another’s post, but possibly from what they could direct you to. You know Sean’s post above was the last time I learned something here about history, because Sean directed to learn how Revisionist Zionist was inspired partly by the Ukrainian nationalism. I would usually have expected Polish nationalism. But the influence of Ukrainian nationalism is written by Jabotinsky. But Sean just wrote the hint for us to study.

    • Replies: @Mr. Hack
    @Dmitry


    I feel sad when he was recently repeating all his worst “teaching” with Here Be Dragon, which I felt like he would have developed beyond, especially after the events this year.
     
    I don't know that he was "teaching" things here or not, just expressing his views that he probably had been developing for several years, that he didn't feel needed any further "development". He probably felt quite comfortable with his own views. Dragon Man reminded me of a Raches light type of character, especially with his graphic photos (that often enough were incorrectly labelled).

    You can see in the recent posts I was to trying to see if I could direct him read Ignatius of Loyola, Thomas Kempis, or Bible, to read the teaching of Jesus. My posts could be too incompatible, but if we can direct him to read famous people of the past.
     
    I recall that comment of yours. AP never replied back, but even still I wouldn't be surprised that he was already familiar with these writers, and especially the Bible.

    I enjoy reading comments that the both of you "polymaths" and Bashibusuk put out. At times even Bekov rises to the occasion too. A lot of well-read and intelligent folks comment here at this blog. You do have a very good understanding of the Bible and of Christianity too. I sincerely hope that someday soon, your knowledge will open up your nous for even greater things!

    Sean is developing into a very interesting commenter here...

  854. @LatW
    @Dmitry


    Apart from a museum which has propaganda, it’s mainly community centre for the local people. It’s a place for the events like concerts.
     
    Yea, I remember that one really cool avant-garde fashion show was staged in the Yeltsin center. I'm sure some of those events would be considered "degenerate" by nationalists (or "patriots" as they're called in Russia).

    It’s the same as every Lenin street in Russia are mostly used like any boring road.
     

    I'm not sure about that, my guess is they mostly host liberals. Maybe they do it deliberately?

    When pop singers like Klava Koka will sing for kids, then her concert would be there
     
    Well, exactly. Klava Koka is very decadent. Not sure she should be singing for kids. She has songs about collecting boyfriends which may be hilarious for grown women, but maybe not for young girls.

    If I remember, I was writing a sarcastic joke about their promotional video for the 1990s, which has triggered Bashibuzuk.
     
    Well, yea, because he hated those events of 1994 where Yeltsin stomped out the patriotic forces of Russia.

    AltanBakshi was one of the best commentators here. But it seems in the end they have some conflict
     
    Because Altan couldn't accept any criticism of Putinism.

    Lol you are Soviet people here, born in the USSR.
     
    Well, just because someone was physically born in the USSR doesn't mean they're a Soviet person. Here I do not agree with AP (or you, if you believe so). People like me or Bashi are not really "Soviet people". I have the impression that you (and other Russians ) stand up for the SU way more than I do.
    I will not defend the SU, but I also don't like it when open lies or stereotypes about the SU are spread. Especially when innocent people are trashed. And I don't care about AP's insults because I am above that and he is very subjective. I'm not that fixated on that period.

    Most of my schooling was not even in the SU, and even as a child, I was heavily influenced by older family members who had very strong roots in the pre-1940s culture (and even before that). For example, one of my older relatives had a condo in the center of Riga that had a huge bookshelf filled with books from 1920-30s and books in German from the late 19th century. Later my aunt inherited this condo, with the bookshelf and we spent a lot of time there. Not in some Soviet bootcamp, lol. Btw, not a single one of my grandparents spoke Russian and no one was in the Communist party. It also feels that many in the parents' generation started floating away already in the late 70s and 80s, a lot of them started worshipping the West. It was the same in Russia. That culture was imposed on them so they gravitated to the West partly out of protest, probably.

    What about you, how come you know so much about the time that existed before you? I feel kind of bad for you, you didn't get to experience a lot of the good period. There were some good times in the 80s, even 90s and 2000s. You must've just really experienced the 2000s. It was a kind of a long lull of carelessness and now the situation is not that great. You deserved to experience more of this less aggressive and more conflict-free period.

    Replies: @Dmitry

    by nationalists (or “patriots” as they’re called in Russia

    You know it is mostly theatre. Like “Good cop, bad cop”. As for “patriots”, the nowadays descriptions could be “imperialists”.

    sure about that, my guess is they mostly host liberals.

    As you know, it’s confusing in English, as liberal has a bit different meaning in postsoviet Russia. It’s like people with “Western” political clothes. Not necessarily so “pro-democracy”, as some of the most powerful liberals have not exactly protesting certain action of the governments, which they are some of the most important supporters for and its collaborators.

    As for the culture events there, it’s like 90% classical music. https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLFaXVYO8yQ2J0R1hD4MrLyaIcU-pRw_fv.

    Klava Koka is very decadent

    When they say in Russia it is so intolerant for the LGBT culture and the male dancing in Kremlin’s concert hall is like. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INKXoQuZb_U.

    AP’s insults because I am above that and he is very subjective.

    You cannot escape the responsibly so easy. As Latvian you are punished by God more than Russians, according to the raingod theology. But somehow despite creating supposedly the October revolution, Latvia becomes one of the few developed, peaceful postsoviet countries in the 21st century. If he was logical to derive from result backwards, it would look like the raingod in 1917 was supporting the Baltic shooters. https://www.unz.com/akarlin/sixth-proof/#comment-3206911

    culture was imposed on them so they gravitated to the West partly out of protest, probably

    Well, when the natural culture there should probably be Scandinavia, not completely unattractive as a concept.

    What about you, how come you know so much about the time that existed before you? I feel kind of bad

    I feel like somekind of emigrant from the 1970s as much of the people of my time. I guess perhaps because the local things when I was a child were mostly from the 1970s/1980s. There was a lot of more recent things, whether from culture or objects, but the new replacement culture was from the West in origin. So, there is the local culture including the material culture which is fixed earlier and the newer things (including material culture) are arriving from the West and not native plants.

    You deserved to experience more of this less aggressive and more conflict-free period.

    We are all lucky in the forum I’m pretty sure. You can see by the small things everyone complains about. The people which need the sympathy deserved another experience, probably are/were in Mariupol.

    • Replies: @LatW
    @Dmitry


    As for “patriots”, the nowadays descriptions could be “imperialists”.
     
    I know. I just enjoy calling them that. It's a little bit jokingly.

    Anyway, there is something called the "Freedom Hall" at the Yeltsin center, that's cool.

    When they say in Russia it is so intolerant for the LGBT culture and the male dancing in Kremlin’s concert hall is like.
     
    Yea, as long as it's just pure entertainment, without making politics, then it's acceptable.

    But somehow despite creating supposedly the October revolution
     
    Oh, I'm so flattered that the raingod bestowed such power on us.

    Latvia becomes one of the few developed, peaceful postsoviet countries in the 21st century.
     
    Maybe the raingod can see better than human fundies and is able to go back to 1905 or even the end of the 19th century. Yea, the century would've started ok if it wasn't for this horror...

    Btw, some Russian nationalists consider this RusFed government "neo-Bolshevik".

    Well, when the natural culture there should probably be Scandinavia, not completely unattractive as a concept.
     
    There's always been a little bit of an overlap with Scandinavian culture, but not all the way, of course. It's actually good because Scandinavian culture in some aspects, takes things too far. We had our own non-Sovietized culture that was quite decent. I support retaining distinct cultures. But I do like some of the new Nordic style houses that have been recently built. It's actually debatable whose "Nordic" it is... there is even some of that in Northern Russia. It's a large area actually.

    I guess perhaps because the local things when I was a child were mostly from the 1970s/1980s. There was a lot of more recent things, whether from culture or objects, but it was from the West in the origin. So, there is the local culture including the material culture which is fixed earlier and the newer things are coming from the West.
     
    Yea, I know what you mean. That's cool, then you must know stuff like Gena and Cheburashka. There is some cool local culture from the 90s, 2000s, too.

    The people which need the sympathy deserved another experience, probably are/were in Mariupol.
     
    Couldn't agree more. We should never forget them. We have been lucky to have lived longer than many of them.... 😢

    Replies: @Dmitry

  855. @Dmitry
    @LatW


    by nationalists (or “patriots” as they’re called in Russia
     
    You know it is mostly theatre. Like "Good cop, bad cop". As for "patriots", the nowadays descriptions could be "imperialists".

    sure about that, my guess is they mostly host liberals.
     
    As you know, it's confusing in English, as liberal has a bit different meaning in postsoviet Russia. It's like people with "Western" political clothes. Not necessarily so "pro-democracy", as some of the most powerful liberals have not exactly protesting certain action of the governments, which they are some of the most important supporters for and its collaborators.

    As for the culture events there, it's like 90% classical music. https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLFaXVYO8yQ2J0R1hD4MrLyaIcU-pRw_fv.


    Klava Koka is very decadent
     
    When they say in Russia it is so intolerant for the LGBT culture and the male dancing in Kremlin's concert hall is like. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INKXoQuZb_U.

    AP’s insults because I am above that and he is very subjective.

     

    You cannot escape the responsibly so easy. As Latvian you are punished by God more than Russians, according to the raingod theology. But somehow despite creating supposedly the October revolution, Latvia becomes one of the few developed, peaceful postsoviet countries in the 21st century. If he was logical to derive from result backwards, it would look like the raingod in 1917 was supporting the Baltic shooters. https://www.unz.com/akarlin/sixth-proof/#comment-3206911

    culture was imposed on them so they gravitated to the West partly out of protest, probably
     
    Well, when the natural culture there should probably be Scandinavia, not completely unattractive as a concept.

    What about you, how come you know so much about the time that existed before you? I feel kind of bad
     
    I feel like somekind of emigrant from the 1970s as much of the people of my time. I guess perhaps because the local things when I was a child were mostly from the 1970s/1980s. There was a lot of more recent things, whether from culture or objects, but the new replacement culture was from the West in origin. So, there is the local culture including the material culture which is fixed earlier and the newer things (including material culture) are arriving from the West and not native plants.

    You deserved to experience more of this less aggressive and more conflict-free period.
     
    We are all lucky in the forum I'm pretty sure. You can see by the small things everyone complains about. The people which need the sympathy deserved another experience, probably are/were in Mariupol.

    Replies: @LatW

    As for “patriots”, the nowadays descriptions could be “imperialists”.

    I know. I just enjoy calling them that. It’s a little bit jokingly.

    Anyway, there is something called the “Freedom Hall” at the Yeltsin center, that’s cool.

    [MORE]

    When they say in Russia it is so intolerant for the LGBT culture and the male dancing in Kremlin’s concert hall is like.

    Yea, as long as it’s just pure entertainment, without making politics, then it’s acceptable.

    But somehow despite creating supposedly the October revolution

    Oh, I’m so flattered that the raingod bestowed such power on us.

    Latvia becomes one of the few developed, peaceful postsoviet countries in the 21st century.

    Maybe the raingod can see better than human fundies and is able to go back to 1905 or even the end of the 19th century. Yea, the century would’ve started ok if it wasn’t for this horror…

    Btw, some Russian nationalists consider this RusFed government “neo-Bolshevik”.

    Well, when the natural culture there should probably be Scandinavia, not completely unattractive as a concept.

    There’s always been a little bit of an overlap with Scandinavian culture, but not all the way, of course. It’s actually good because Scandinavian culture in some aspects, takes things too far. We had our own non-Sovietized culture that was quite decent. I support retaining distinct cultures. But I do like some of the new Nordic style houses that have been recently built. It’s actually debatable whose “Nordic” it is… there is even some of that in Northern Russia. It’s a large area actually.

    I guess perhaps because the local things when I was a child were mostly from the 1970s/1980s. There was a lot of more recent things, whether from culture or objects, but it was from the West in the origin. So, there is the local culture including the material culture which is fixed earlier and the newer things are coming from the West.

    Yea, I know what you mean. That’s cool, then you must know stuff like Gena and Cheburashka. There is some cool local culture from the 90s, 2000s, too.

    The people which need the sympathy deserved another experience, probably are/were in Mariupol.

    Couldn’t agree more. We should never forget them. We have been lucky to have lived longer than many of them…. 😢

    • Replies: @Dmitry
    @LatW


    making politics, then it’s acceptable.
     
    It's a lower cost boundary marking for the authorities. Mizulina writes the LGBT propaganda law while her children work to support LGBT rights in the EU. You know cats piss on a tree to show each other where their territory begins or finishes. In this example, the same family was doing this on both sides of the territory.

    But because choice of the boundary has been arbitrary and so the reality is not as consistent to the authorities' signaling as the Western propaganda would view this e.g. LGBT clubs common in the Russian cities.


    Gena and Cheburashka. There is some cool local culture from the 90s, 2000s,
     
    Yes for everyone until the 2000s. The existence of the local culture continues to around early of 2000s, but this was really the last wave of culture of the 1980s.

    For example, in pop music, you can still hear the local sounds until around 2010. I would say after this it becomes the same as Western pop in the formal musical sound. You sometimes can hear things of late 19th century Russian composers in the 2000s pop.


    Couldn’t agree more. We should never forget them. We have been lucky to have lived longer than many of them…. 😢

     

    I remember we used to post the city in the forum a few years ago. It was not a bad looking city. https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-86/#comment-3396043

    At least this person who makes those drone video is still uploading https://www.youtube.com/c/SunVideo/videos.

  856. @Dmitry
    @Mr. Hack

    I like AP a lot (well to extent of internet forums) which is why I feel sad when he was recently repeating all his worst "teaching" with Here Be Dragon, which I felt like he would have developed beyond, especially after the events this year.

    You know the war in Ukraine might have changed his "unusual" views or made given a sense of humanism. But it seems like the opposite.

    Perhaps it's just me, but I felt often there is a sign of flexibility and dialogue with his "unusual" views, which is probably what motivates people to criticize them.

    You can see in the recent posts I was to trying to see if I could direct him read Ignatius of Loyola, Thomas Kempis, or Bible, to read the teaching of Jesus. My posts could be too incompatible, but if we can direct him to read famous people of the past.

    The time you learn something in the forum, is usually not from reading another's post, but possibly from what they could direct you to. You know Sean's post above was the last time I learned something here about history, because Sean directed to learn how Revisionist Zionist was inspired partly by the Ukrainian nationalism. I would usually have expected Polish nationalism. But the influence of Ukrainian nationalism is written by Jabotinsky. But Sean just wrote the hint for us to study.

    Replies: @Mr. Hack

    I feel sad when he was recently repeating all his worst “teaching” with Here Be Dragon, which I felt like he would have developed beyond, especially after the events this year.

    I don’t know that he was “teaching” things here or not, just expressing his views that he probably had been developing for several years, that he didn’t feel needed any further “development”. He probably felt quite comfortable with his own views. Dragon Man reminded me of a Raches light type of character, especially with his graphic photos (that often enough were incorrectly labelled).

    You can see in the recent posts I was to trying to see if I could direct him read Ignatius of Loyola, Thomas Kempis, or Bible, to read the teaching of Jesus. My posts could be too incompatible, but if we can direct him to read famous people of the past.

    I recall that comment of yours. AP never replied back, but even still I wouldn’t be surprised that he was already familiar with these writers, and especially the Bible.

    I enjoy reading comments that the both of you “polymaths” and Bashibusuk put out. At times even Bekov rises to the occasion too. A lot of well-read and intelligent folks comment here at this blog. You do have a very good understanding of the Bible and of Christianity too. I sincerely hope that someday soon, your knowledge will open up your nous for even greater things!

    Sean is developing into a very interesting commenter here…

  857. @LondonBob
    @Philip Owen

    No, NATO thought Russia hadn't assembled enough forces to invade successfully, of course Russia didn't invade to conquer, they invaded to assist the Donbass and force a diplomatic settlement. They then thought the Russian economy would collapse after sanctions and Russia would be diplomatically isolated, it didn't work out. Russia has gone on far longer than the neocons planned, and Russia has destroyed so much of the Soviet era weaponry they have been forced to supply more than they ever thought necessary.

    Replies: @Philip Owen

    Putin state that he was invading to decommunize Ukraine, which is to say, conquer Novorossiya, the Kharkiv state. It is slowly slipping away.

  858. @LatW
    @Dmitry


    As for “patriots”, the nowadays descriptions could be “imperialists”.
     
    I know. I just enjoy calling them that. It's a little bit jokingly.

    Anyway, there is something called the "Freedom Hall" at the Yeltsin center, that's cool.

    When they say in Russia it is so intolerant for the LGBT culture and the male dancing in Kremlin’s concert hall is like.
     
    Yea, as long as it's just pure entertainment, without making politics, then it's acceptable.

    But somehow despite creating supposedly the October revolution
     
    Oh, I'm so flattered that the raingod bestowed such power on us.

    Latvia becomes one of the few developed, peaceful postsoviet countries in the 21st century.
     
    Maybe the raingod can see better than human fundies and is able to go back to 1905 or even the end of the 19th century. Yea, the century would've started ok if it wasn't for this horror...

    Btw, some Russian nationalists consider this RusFed government "neo-Bolshevik".

    Well, when the natural culture there should probably be Scandinavia, not completely unattractive as a concept.
     
    There's always been a little bit of an overlap with Scandinavian culture, but not all the way, of course. It's actually good because Scandinavian culture in some aspects, takes things too far. We had our own non-Sovietized culture that was quite decent. I support retaining distinct cultures. But I do like some of the new Nordic style houses that have been recently built. It's actually debatable whose "Nordic" it is... there is even some of that in Northern Russia. It's a large area actually.

    I guess perhaps because the local things when I was a child were mostly from the 1970s/1980s. There was a lot of more recent things, whether from culture or objects, but it was from the West in the origin. So, there is the local culture including the material culture which is fixed earlier and the newer things are coming from the West.
     
    Yea, I know what you mean. That's cool, then you must know stuff like Gena and Cheburashka. There is some cool local culture from the 90s, 2000s, too.

    The people which need the sympathy deserved another experience, probably are/were in Mariupol.
     
    Couldn't agree more. We should never forget them. We have been lucky to have lived longer than many of them.... 😢

    Replies: @Dmitry

    making politics, then it’s acceptable.

    It’s a lower cost boundary marking for the authorities. Mizulina writes the LGBT propaganda law while her children work to support LGBT rights in the EU. You know cats piss on a tree to show each other where their territory begins or finishes. In this example, the same family was doing this on both sides of the territory.

    But because choice of the boundary has been arbitrary and so the reality is not as consistent to the authorities’ signaling as the Western propaganda would view this e.g. LGBT clubs common in the Russian cities.

    Gena and Cheburashka. There is some cool local culture from the 90s, 2000s,

    Yes for everyone until the 2000s. The existence of the local culture continues to around early of 2000s, but this was really the last wave of culture of the 1980s.

    For example, in pop music, you can still hear the local sounds until around 2010. I would say after this it becomes the same as Western pop in the formal musical sound. You sometimes can hear things of late 19th century Russian composers in the 2000s pop.

    Couldn’t agree more. We should never forget them. We have been lucky to have lived longer than many of them…. 😢

    I remember we used to post the city in the forum a few years ago. It was not a bad looking city. https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-86/#comment-3396043

    At least this person who makes those drone video is still uploading https://www.youtube.com/c/SunVideo/videos.

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to All Karlin Community Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
From the Leo Frank Case to the Present Day
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement