Unz评论•另类媒体选择$
美国主流媒体大都排除了有趣,重要和有争议的观点
 太尔新闻
Unz评论 突然被Facebook禁止!
通过电子邮件将此页面发送给其他人

 记住我的信息



=>

书签 全部切换总目录添加到图书馆从图书馆中删除 • B
显示评论下一个新评论下一个新回复了解更多
回复同意/不同意/等等 更多... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
同意不同意谢谢LOL轮唱
这些按钮可将您的公开协议,异议,感谢,LOL或巨魔与所选注释一起注册。 仅对最近使用“记住我的信息”复选框保存姓名和电子邮件的频繁评论者可用,并且在任何八个小时的时间内也只能使用三次。
忽略评论者 关注评论者
搜寻文字 区分大小写  确切的词  包括评论
列表 书签

我的早报最近提到了Facebook打击与我们持续发生的Covid-19流行病有关的错误信息的计划,并且可能像大多数其他读者一样,我只是点了点头。 毕竟,如果曲柄或恶作剧开始对这种致命疾病进行高度怀疑的治疗,许多美国人可能会丧命,甚至可能暗示人们应该给自己注射Lysol来预防感染。

但是,这些无聊的公开声明在昨天下午发现我的所有材料都完全不同。 Unz评论 因涉嫌违反“社区标准”而突然被禁止,并且 我们自己的Facebook页面被淘汰.

我本人并没有使用社交媒体,但显然其他人使用社交媒体,并且阻止我们的所有网站内容访问1.7亿个Facebook用户似乎是非常艰巨的一步。 因此,很奇怪为什么会这样,尤其是为什么现在呢?

从一开始 座右铭 我们出版物的 美国主流媒体大都排除了有趣,重要和有争议的观点,我认为我们已经兑现了这一承诺,发表了成千上万的文章和帖子,涉及范围极广的有争议甚至禁止的主题,尤其是我自己的主题 美国真理报 系列。

在这种情况下,被Facebook禁止似乎并不令人惊讶。 但是,许多我们最有争议的作品是几年前出版的, 愤怒的谴责 来自各个方面的信息,但显然得到了社会网络之王的认可。 在过去几周内,我们发表的几乎所有“感性”作品似乎都比一年,两年甚至三年前的作品更“感性”。 那么,是什么突然引发了这一前所未有的行动?

尽管我不确定,但我强烈怀疑触发事件是 我自己最近在美国Pravda上发表的文章,就像对待冠状病毒流行一样,这是Facebook当前打击行动的重点。 而且,这篇文章不仅积累了比我以前的任何文章更早的读者群,而且还吸引了两倍或三倍的Facebook Likes,这在某些方面可能引起了人们的严重关注。

我之前在美国《真理报》上发表的文章几乎没什么好说的,但对“肯尼迪暗杀案”或“第二次世界大战”的既定叙事提出争议可能只是纯粹的智力活动,几乎没有实际影响。 相反,在我们的经济崩溃之际,成千上万的美国人已经死于冠状病毒爆发。 因此,对这场巨大的国家灾难的起源提出令人不安的问题可能被认为太麻烦了,以至于无法在Facebook上发布。

American Pravda:作为生物战后备力量的冠状病毒灾难? 是我7,400字文章的标题,我在结尾部分回答了这一爆炸性查询:

随着冠状病毒逐渐开始蔓延到中国境外,另一件事情发生了,这大大增加了我的怀疑。 这些早期病例中的大多数都发生在与中国接壤的东亚国家中,正如人们所预料的那样。 但到二月底 伊朗已成为全球疫情的第二个震中. 更令人惊讶的是,其政治精英受到的打击尤其严重, 整个伊朗议会的整整10%即将感染 和至少 十几个官员和政治家 死于疾病,包括一些 相当高级。 确实,推特上的Neocon活动家开始兴高采烈地指出,他们仇恨的伊朗敌人现在像苍蝇一样下落。

让我们考虑这些事实的含义。 在全世界范围内,唯一遭受重大人员伤亡的政治精英是伊朗的政治精英,他们很早就去世了,甚至在中国以外的世界上几乎任何地方都没有爆发大爆发之前就已经死亡。 因此,我们在2月XNUMX日让美国暗杀了伊朗的最高军事指挥官,然后在几周后,伊朗统治精英分子的大部分被一种神秘而致命的新病毒感染,其中许多人很快因此丧命。 任何理性的人都可能将这仅仅是巧合吗?

•••

上个月,五人一组 WSJ 记者制作了非常详尽和透彻的 4,400字分析 在同一时期, 纽约时报 已发表 有用的时间表 那些早期事件中也是如此。 尽管重点或小意见分歧可能会有所不同,但所有这些美国媒体都同意,中国官员最早在11月中旬至XNUMX月中旬就意识到武汉市发生了严重的病毒暴发,第一例已知死亡发生在XNUMX月XNUMX日,终于在同月晚些时候实施了重大的新公共卫生措施。 显然没有人对这些基本事实提出异议。

但是由于后来我们自己的政府无所作为的可怕后果是显而易见的,我们情报机构中的人员试图证明他们不是在转瞬即逝的人。 本月初, an 美国广播公司新闻 故事 引用四个不同的政府消息来源透露,早在 XNUMX 月下旬,我们国防情报局下属的一个特殊医学情报部门就发布了一份报告,警告称中国武汉地区正在发生一场失控的疾病流行,并广泛传播。将该文件分发给我们政府的高层,警告应采取措施保护驻扎在亚洲的美军。 故事播出后,五角大楼发言人正式否认了 XNUMX 月报告的存在,而其他各级政府和情报官员拒绝发表评论。 但几天后, 以色列电视台提到 美国情报部门确实在XNUMX月与北约和以色列盟友分享了有关武汉疾病暴发的报道,因此似乎独立地证实了《美国广播公司新闻》原始报道及其政府的多个消息的全部准确性。

因此,国防情报局的人员似乎比中国政府本身的官员早一个多月就意识到武汉发生了致命的病毒性暴发。 除非我们的情报机构率先采用预知技术,否则我认为发生这种情况的原因可能与纵火犯最早了解未来火灾的原因相同。

早在二月份,在一个美国人死于这种疾病之前, 我写了我自己的概述 可能发生的事情,今天我仍然坚持:

考虑这种情况的特别具有讽刺意味的结果,不是特别可能,但肯定是可能的……

所有人都知道,美国的统治精英是犯罪分子,疯狂分子,而且也极为无能。

因此,也许冠状病毒的爆发确实是对中国的蓄意的生物战袭击,正好在农历新年之前袭击了那个国家,这是造成全国性大流行的最糟糕的时间。 但是,中华人民共和国作出了迅速而有效的反应,实施了人类历史上最大规模的隔离,现在这种致命的疾病似乎正在减少。

同时,这种疾病自然会泄漏回美国,尽管发出了所有提前警告,但我们完全无能的政府却未能正确处理局势,造成了巨大的全国性健康灾难,经济崩溃,政治体系日趋衰落。

就像我说的那样,美国帝国终结的可能性不大,但肯定是一个非常合适的终结……

这些简单的想法在社交媒体上的传播可能会产生戏剧性的政治后果,因此我可以轻松地理解为什么某些因素会采取强有力的措施来防止这种情况。

 
• 类别: 思想 •标签: 美国媒体, 检查, 阴谋论, 冠状病毒, Facebook 
隐藏381条评论发表评论
忽略评论者...跟随Endorsed Only
修剪评论?
    []
  1. You are at odds with most commenters. But that is your raison d’être. With all of the suppression going on via the MSM and big internet companies, there is even more room for independent voices. How about yours?

    • 同意: Mikhail
    • 回复: @anon
    , @Trickster
    , @Richard B
  2. St-Germain 说:

    Kudos! Pop up your chest, Ron Unz. A pathetic “mayday” alert from a corporate-government media outfit like Facebook is way better than a Puzlitzer.

    • 回复: @Wally
    , @tomo
  3. animalogic 说:

    ANY suggestion that the US is responsible for Cov19 becomes by the day more politically toxic — ie the vicious quest to blame China for ALL the consequences of the virus is looking ever more like the steamroller campaign to justify attacking Iraq nearly 20 years ago.
    That it’s total bullshit IS the point: the more grotesque the lies the more they must be unconditionally defended.

    • 回复: @Curmudgeon
    , @Wally
    , @DaveE
  4. BuelahMan 说:

    It doesn’t make sense since most posts are parroting the fear porn. I suspect that they are culling the comments which by and large take the fear porn authors to task.

    • 回复: @PetrOldSack
  5. Bert 说:

    Mr. Unz, your hypothesis of a U.S. biological attack has not seemed convincing to me, but in light of the Facebook censorship, I think you should take steps to enhance your personal safety. You may have laid one too many straws on to the camel.

    • 同意: Dutch Boy, Graham Seibert
    • 回复: @Anonymous
    , @Derer
    , @JamesinNM
  6. anon[146]• 免责声明 说:

    Don’t worry. Donald Trump is monitoring the situation.

    • 哈哈: Anatoly Karlin
    • 回复: @Curmudgeon
    , @Wally
    , @N30rebel
  7. Will you be appealing the ban?

    • 回复: @lloyd
  8. I’d consider it an honor. I’ve never gone on Fakebook and don’t intend to.

  9. Emslander 说:

    There are too many unknowns about the events of the first months of 2020, surely to be one of the most unsettling short periods in the history of our country and the world. The digital masters of the universe have been depending upon one version of those events, while most common observers seem to be thrashing about in a whole different set of evidence.

    The Unz Review, while exploring all of the wild manifestations of populism, seems to be allowing for the most complete exposition of all opinions and incomplete fact scenarios. Some people with a lot at stake don’t like the conclusions that are being drawn. This is a long way from being over.

    Being banned by facebook may be your finest hour.

    • 同意: GalenMD
  10. I guess, these days, being banned is something of a badge of honor.

    • 同意: Bubba, kikz
    • 回复: @Anonymous
    , @aandrews
  11. Facebook 是政府,你的第一修正案言论自由权被侵犯了。

    • 同意: Servant of Gla'aki
  12. Christ on a cracker! Your reputation would have suffered if you weren’t banned by Facefarce. As the old analogy goes ” you only draw flak when you are over the target”. Though the traffic issue may cause some consternation people who truly think and are interested in real issues and discourse will find this site in any event and it would be a fraction of a fraction of the 1.7 billion in any event.

    I always liked the Thomas Edison chestnut that ” only 5% of the people think, 10% think they think and 85 % would sooner die than think” . I would only revise the percentages as 1%, 25%, and 84% and still feel generous with the 1%.

    Forward ever forward…

    干杯-

    • 谢谢: Alfred
  13. UNZ.com has probably drawn the ire of that 对社会负责 org that has decided it and it alone will have the final say as to who can exist on the Internet, and that would be the ADL–Another Damn Lie.

  14. Ano4 说:

    嗨罗恩,

    This analysis of yours and Whitney Webb’s publications , which you have allowed to become more widely known, would be enough to convince a great number of people that some powerful interests in the Anglo-American sphere of dominance are behind the current situation.

    Whether this is true or not is of no importance.

    As the narrative builds up towards Cold War with China, dissident voices must be silenced for fear of fueling social unrest.

    It might well be that a new Censorship Tsunami would soon be crashing through the internet.

    It should be expected as it is well known that truth is the first casualty of war.

    And as any reader of your American Pravda series should understand:

    “过去是可以改变的。 过去从未改变。 大洋洲正与东亚交战。 大洋洲一直在与东亚交战。”

  15. Michael888 说:

    I still do not believe Trump knows what the CIA is doing. They are famous for undercutting Eisenhower by disregarding his orders to stop all spy plane flights before a meeting with Khrushchev, a peace meeting aborted when Gary Powers was shot down, and also stopped JFK’s order to make sure all of Castro’s jets were shot down in the Bay of Pigs invasion (although the CIA claimed McGeorge Bundy countermanded that order when the first attempt failed). Both Presidents accepted responsibility. The CIA has continually attacked Trump from John Brennan, who politicized the 2016 Election in favor of CIA-friend and warmonger Hillary, to Eric Ciaramella, CRF member and supposed “whistleblower” leading to Trump’s Impeachment.
    Would the CIA attempt to destroy China’s economy through release of COVID-19 without Trump’s permission? Absolutely! Although probably Pompeo was aware and Haspel surely knew, the cover story was built through NIAID (Fauci’s agency) grants on gain-of-function in coronavirus in bats dating back to at least 2010 (to gain trust), and probably culminating in the War Games in Wuhan last October. The wet market was a convenient scapegoat although the Chinese quickly determined that a third of the early victims had not been near the market; this was not the Bird Flu, transmitted from wet market animals to humans, but not spread human to human. The WHO even accepted the wet market lie and tweeted on January 14th that there was no human-to-human transmission of the virus, thus obviating any need to close borders to Wuhan Chinese (although all the Asian countries closed their borders, which allowed them to deal effectively with the few contaminated who got in). I think Ron Unz gives Trump too much credit; he is not diabolical and smart enough to try something like this. The CIA, on the other hand, are never held accountable for their mistakes.

  16. Kali 说:

    I saw this morning, when trying to share the Sakers latest article that, not only could I not (easily) share it, but that the 4 articles from this website I shared yesterday have been removed.

    Undeterred, I inserted spaces in the url along with a description of the article and of this website, and with instructions to remove the spaces.

    Since the “coronacrisis” began I’ve comment much less here whilst attempting to reach as many people as I can via Facebook. Their censorship of this vast and very important website only makes me more determined to reach out with as much real news and as many views countering establishment narratives as I possibly can.

    I will continue to share by inserting spaces into urls. Hopefully some of the more curious FB users will be intrigued enough to pop over and find out for themselves what makes this site worth bookmarking and checking in at every day.

    Many thanks for such an outstanding website!

    带着爱,
    卡利

    • 谢谢: Alden
    • 回复: @Kali
  17. Naaah! Its not it.
    The ratios work automatically. Increased insecurity of ruling class increases the control of the flow of information. Eventually it will end up that only the ” official information” (as in Communist countries) will be permitted. CNN and Facebook are now the official information.

  18. The myth of a free press is dying with the mainstream media themselves. The press was free only so long as it was owned by trusted members of the Establishment.

    I recently contcted with a marketing firm to market the Here Comes China newsletter on Facebook’s platform. Here’s the correspondence.

    Me to HH Consulting: There are two successful newsletters publishing bad news about China. My weekly newsletter features good news about China, its successes and progress. It covers survey results, technology, social trends, finances and economy. I’ve attached a draft copy. I want to begin my social media promotion targeting people who regularly follow China-related topics and would like to know the size and composition of that audience.

    HH Consulting’s reply:Godfree, our team are still confirming a couple of things. We want to ensure that if we do perform the advertising that it will be compliant with Facebook terms. I should have an answer within a couple days for you. After that point I will submit a cancel order request .

    事实证明, 积极 news about China contravenes Facebook’s community guidelines..

    • 同意: Si1ver1ock
    • 谢谢: Kali
  19. T. Weed 说:

    I was often invited to join Facebook, but refused because I had read that Mark Zuckerberg stole the idea of it from a college roommate. Sleazy enough to arouse indignation. Anyway, it has become obvious that Facebook, along with Google, has become an asset of the Deep State, publishing lies and censoring truth, and should never be trusted. One of the few voices I do trust is that of Ron Unz.

  20. The American government has a long history of burying things they don’t like. There are many ways to do this, some direct and some indirect. The Unz Review’s Facebook ban coming after it floated a CIA-China coronavirus conspiracy theory is just the latest example (I personally don’t think the CIA was responsible – no one can be that dumb and/or malicious … right?)

    Take, for instance, allegations the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) was involved in an illicit “skimming off the top” cocaine trafficking operation during the 1980s. I believe the implication was that they were turning a blind eye to drug traffickers in order to extract enough kickbacks from them to fund various anti-communist rebel operations in Central and South America against congressional funding restraint.

    A reporter for the 圣何塞水星报 wrote an expose on the subject in the 1990s. Then, quite suddenly, reputable news sources reviewed the story and pronounced it debunked. Without passing judgement, I do note the curious coincidence between skyrocketing urban crime, Iran-Contra, the sudden explosion of crack cocaine on the streets, and the sudden decrease in violent crime at exactly the moment when democrat Bill Clinton assumed office as president (congressional investigators took it as license to start a serious examination of the issue).

    20 Years of Censored News (1996)
    Carl Jensen and Project Censored
    Seven Stories Press. Copyright 1997. ISBN 1888363517

    [更多]

    “In August 1996, when the 圣何塞水星报 published an in-depth series about the CIA-contra crack shipments that were flooding East Los Angeles, the major media held true to form and suppressed the story. But after the series was circulated around the world on the Web, the story became too difficult to ignore, and the media began its assault. Articles in the Washington Post and The New York Times and reports on network television and PBS announced that there was “no evidence” of CIA involvement, that the Mercury News series was “bad journalism,” and that the public’s interest in this subject was the real problem, a matter of gullibility, hysteria, and conspiracy mania. In fact, the Mercury News series, drawing from a year-long investigation, cited specific agents and dealer. When placed on the Web, the series was copiously supplemented with pertinent documents and depositions that supported the charge. The mainstream media simply ignored that evidence and repeatedly lied by saying it did not exist.” – introduction, Pg. 29

    ...

    “The CIA helped Miami-based drug traffickers smuggle their illicit cargo into the US in exchange for their help in arming the contras”. SOURCE: The Christic Institute Special Report, November 1987, “The Contra-Drug Connection,” by the Christic Institute. –Pg. 204.

    更新:

    “Finally, starting on August 18, 1996, the 圣何塞水星报 published an extraordinary three-part series that confirmed the #2 Censored story of 1987. … investigative journalist Gary Webb of the 水星新闻, revealed the contra drug smuggling network, exposed the CIA’s role, and made an important connection between the flawed foreign policy of Reagan and Bush in the 1980s and America’s drug-devastated streets of today. Anyone who wants to understand how crack cocaine became the scourge of America’s urban centers during the greatest crackdown on drugs in history, is urged to read the 水星新闻 系列。”

    “… Not surprisingly, three of the nation’s largest newspapers – 纽约时报 (10/21/96), the “华盛顿邮报” (10/4/96), and the 洛杉矶时报 (10/20/96) – which hadn’t investigated and reported the original charges by the Christic Institute, were quick to investigate and report the 水星新闻 charges in a transparent effort to discredit them. The old ‘not exposed here’ process is embarrassingly evident in these belated efforts.”

    Then “Jeffry Ceppos, executive editor of the Mercury News, published a column saying the paper made mistakes in its ‘Dark Alliance’ series and that he did ‘not believe that top CIA officials knew of the relationship.’ Series author Webb disagreed and said he stood by his stories (旧金山考官, 5/12/97). The internet series is now prefaced by a statement directing readers to the May 11 column for ‘an understanding of this document or story.’ In July 1997, Webb told Project Censored he was taken off investigative reporting and exiled to Cupertino, a small community west of San Jose.” – Pgs. 204 – 205.

    ...

    Bush’s role as a CIA asset in 1963 when he ran the Zapata offshore drilling company; Bush’s relationship with Manuel Noriega while he was CIA chief and Noriega was Panama’s chief of military intelligences and a paid CIA informant; Bush’s support for the secret 1986 arms shipment to Iran; Bush’s failure as drug czar for the Reagan Administration.”

    来源: 旧金山湾卫报, 11/2/88, “George Bush’s Dirty Secrets,” by Richard Meeker; EXTRA!, September/October 1988, “The GOP-Nazi Connection.” – pg. 218

    ...

    Ex-DEA agent calls Drug War a Fraud. 1990. “The latest insider to ‘go public’ is Michael Levine, who retired from the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) after 25 years as a leading undercover agent for various law enforcement agencies. … Upon his retirement, Levine published a critical expose of the DEA in which he documents his journey from true believer to drug war heretic. Levine documents numerous instances of CIA involvement in the drug trade, State Department intervention, and DEA cooperation with both parties. Levine’s story closely parallels that of Richard Gregorie whose defection from the Attorney General’s office was the fourth ranked censored story of 1989. According to Levine, ‘The only think we know with certainty is that the drug war is not for real. The drug economy in the United States is as much as \$200 billion a year, and it is being used to finance political operations, pay international debts–all sorts of things'”。

    SOURCES: EXTRA!, July/August 1990, “Ex-DEA Agent Calls Drug War a Fraud,” by Martin A. Lee; The Humanist, September/October 1990, “A Funny, Dirty Little Drug War,” by Rich Szykowny. – Pg. 253.

    ...

    George H.W. lied about being out of the loop for Iran-Contra. He was present at several high-level meetings where the subject was raised. – Pg. 258.

    ...

    Oliver North & Co. Banned from Costa Rica after government accused them of running a drug front. “In July 1989, Oliver North and other major “contragate” figures were barred from Costa Rica. The order was issued by none other than Oscar Arias Sanchez, president of Costa Rican and winner of the 1987 Nobel Peace Prize. President Arias was acting on recommendations from a Costa Rican congressional commission investigating drug trafficking. The commission concluded that the contra re-supply network in Costa Rica, which North coordinated from the White House, doubled as a drug smuggling operation. As a result of the commission’s findings, North, former National Security Advisor John Poindexter, former U.S. Ambassador to Costa Rica Lewis Tambs, Major General Richard Secord, and former CIA stations chief in Costa Rica Joseph Fernandez, are barred from ever setting foot in Costa Rica again. The reactions of the U.S. press to this story was one of complete indifference. Despite a lengthy 美联社 wire report (7/22/89), mainstream media either ignored the story completely, or, like the “华盛顿邮报”迈阿密先驱报, relegated it to “News in Brief” sections. 纽约时报 and all three major television networks failed to mention the story at all.”

    SOURCE: EXTRA!, October/November 1989, “Censored News: Oliver North & Co. Banned from Costa Rica.” Update: Oliver North left government, failed to win a Virginia senate seat, but made \$1.7 million from speaking fees and book contracts in 1992 and 1993; his total assets were estimated at \$3 million dollars. – Pg. 240.

    ...

    Top Mafia prosecutor’s Miami drug investigation shut down. Told to lay off, he instead quit in protest. “One of the most extraordinary stories is about Richard Gregorie, who was one of the nation’s most successful Mafia prosecutors when he was sent to Miami with orders to go after the top people in the cocaine business. Gregorie did just that for eight years and became the top federal narcotics prosecutor in Miami. He became something of a local hero after making cases against big-time cocaine bosses and drug-corrupted officials from Miami to Medellin. But as Gregorie began penetrating the higher levels of the cocaine business, he began to target foreign officials of supposedly friendly nations, including General Manuel Noriega of Panama, while State Department officials were still courting the dictator. Gregorie’s elaborate undercover sting operations began to concern intelligence and State Department officials and he was soon told to stay away from certain sensitive areas. “I feel a lot like the soldiers in Vietnam felt. We are not allowed to win this war,” said Gregorie. Gregorie’s operations were subsequently stopped at the request of the State Department and he quit in protest in January 1989. Meanwhile Gregorie’s charges were validated by the findings of a Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on Narcotics, Terrorism, and International Operations, which concluded that foreign policy interests were permitted to sidetrack, disrupt, and undercut the war on drug.”

    SOURCES: NBC Nightly News, 2/22/89; 旧金山纪事, 4/15/89, “Policy Reportedly Undercut Drug War,” New York Times Service; Richard Gregorie, 10/10/89, telephone interview. — Pg. 236

    ...

    Bush family drug connection. “Jeb Bush, Son. Jeb, a Miami real estate developer, knew Leonel Martinez, a Miami builder, as a generous contributor to Bush family causes. Others knew that Martinez imported more than 3 ½ tons of cocaine and more than 75 tons of marijuana into the United States and was under investigation for more than four murders.”

    来源: 旧金山考官, 7/28/91, “Crime-linked Firms Hired Prescott Bush”; Santa Rosa Press Democrat, 7/19/91 and 8/6/91, “Neil Bush’s New Boss” and “Son’s S&L Not Closed”; SPIN, 12/3/91, “See No Evil,” by Jefferson Morley; The Texas Observer, 7/12/91 and 8/6/91, “Oil in the Family” and “Global Entanglements,” David Armstrong.

    UPDATE: “On January 17, 1993, the “华盛顿邮报” reported how Leonel Martinez, one of the most successful drug dealers in the United States, was transporting cocaine by the kilo and marijuana by the ton at the same time he was making generous contributions to political campaigns chaired by Jeb Bush. … the 岗位 also noted there was no evidence the Bushes attempted to return his contributions when they learned that he had been arrested on drug charges. Martinez pleaded guilty in 1990, was sentenced to 12 ½ years in prison, and is expected to get out around 1998.” – Pgs. 272 – 274

    ...

    CIA paid for pro-contra media coverage in Honduras. “According to Edgar Chamorro, former head of the contra communications office, ‘approximately 15 Honduran journalists and broadcasters were on the CIA payroll and our influence was thereby extended to every major Honduran newspaper and television station.’ In his affidavit submitted to the World Court in September 1985, Chamorro also said the same tactic was employed by the CIA in Costa Rica in an effort to turn the newspapers and television stations of that country against the Nicaraguan government.” … “Chamorro said he had been paymaster for the Nicaraguan Democratic Force (FDN) and had received money from the CIA to bribe Honduran journalists and broadcasters to write and speak favorably about the FDN and to attack the government of Nicaragua and call for its overthrow.” – Pg. 190

    Note: This book also mentions the mysterious shoot down of KAL 007 in 1983 by the Soviet Union and speculates about possible CIA involvement in a botched spying operation which caused its destruction. There are several other good books on the subject that go into greater detail.

    • 回复: @Bill Jones
    , @Pericles
  21. I tried to share this article on Facebook and this error message popped up: “Your message couldn’t be sent because it includes content that other people on Facebook have reported as abusive.”

    Possibly the usual suspects finally canceled you. Though it could easily be an inside job.

    Perhaps if and when the Empire falls, the snitch papers will be released and provide definite answers as in the former USSR.

    • 回复: @PNWmossback
  22. The more I learn about this pandemic the more it looks like the Deep State did it to wreck Trump’s blue collar prosperity economy. The American Elites are criminal, crazy, and amazingly incompetent but deadly dangerous.

    • 同意: Alden
    • 哈哈: Nodwink
    • 回复: @Jake
    , @anon
  23. We all know how certain “touchy” subjects get memory holed. And the stakes are high here.

    I tend to think it’s just bot behavior – throwing the baby out with the bathwater. I had a similar incidence recently on Twitter for posting data about Covid19.

    Let me stoke the conspiracy fire. It is remarkable how The Unz Review hasn’t been completely banished from the internet. Part of me thinks the site is a honeypot whether Ron knows it or not. The Church Committee, Operation Shamrock and “The Watch List” come to mind. And then there’s the Facebook/Lifelog thing.

    • 同意: YetAnotherAnon
    • 回复: @jsinton
    , @Wielgus
  24. jsinton 说:

    You’re in good company. Zero Hedge got banned from Twitter late January when they broke the story of the Wuhan bioweapons lab with bats, and Indian scientists said the virus had pieces of HIV genetic material in it. No one expects Zero Hedge’s Twitter account to be reinstated now that it’s more mainstream and Trump is investigating. The whole thing has been an Orwellian control exercise from the start. I regard any “conspiracy theory” to hold more truth than the official “explanations” at this point.

    • 回复: @sarz
  25. anon[303]• 免责声明 说: • 您的网站

    As a libertarian who completely disagrees with your analysis (My take? Chinese libertarians in Wuhan were giving different reasons for strange virus happenings a year ago on their since shut down YahooGroup. They said hospitals and markets were recycling contaminated materials including from bio labs such as gloves, needles, containers, and tubing.), I think Facebook is nuts.

    UNZ is providing a great service patiently archiving and curating all kinds of hard-to-find things, and I just hope that there is a plan of continuity for when Mr. Unz ascends to that great blog in the sky.

    In contrast, Facebook seems intent on getting rid of such things now.

    I hope you sue them. They can’t claim the privileges of being a common carrier then not common carry.

    • 同意: Skeptikal, Eagle Eye
    • 回复: @Wally
  26. Bill Jones 说:

    “our own facebook page eliminated”

    Well, I guess it wasn’t your own after all, was it? Is that news to you?

    Did this really come as a surprise?

    • 回复: @Dumbo
  27. 罗恩·恩兹(Ron Unz)写道

    “因此,国防情报局的人员似乎比中国政府本身的任何官员早一个多月就知道武汉发生致命的病毒爆发。”

    或者 ABC 新闻发布的故事是其“来源”的发明。

    • 回复: @Dutch Boy
  28. jsinton 说:
    @Boomertechnocrat

    I think Unz Review has avoided all the banning for a number of reasons. There’s no advertising, no purse strings to cut. The subject matter was so outside the mainstream that any narrow minded fool could disregard it out of hand. Then there is the matter of Mr. Trump rocking the boat so hard that the opposition seems almost irrational at times. Coupled all with the fallacy of the economic policy that finally hit meltdown. And now this virus that just adds more flavor to the disaster. Et voila! Off with their heads.

  29. Bill Jones 说:
    @T. Weed

    There are few, if any, widely used Social Media sites which do not have CIA funding (and all that goes with it) very early in their history.

    The whole thing is a totalitarian’s wet dream that the Stasi could never have envisioned.
    Angela Merkel’s organization could only have your nearest and dearest spying on you. In the US you spy on yourself.

    • 同意: T. Weed
    • 回复: @Eagle Eye
  30. Oh dear 说:

    Face book.. wait, that’s rings a bell… isn’t that sort of like Myspace, or Prodigy…? A pleasant diversion for elderly people, no?

    My sincerest condolences on your ruination.

  31. Bill Jones 说:
    @Divine Right

    你应该提到 CIA=Crack 的记者 Webb 开枪自杀。 两次。

    So much content, too few (limit) comments…………..

    • 回复: @old smokey
  32. anonymous[400]• 免责声明 说:

    Things have gotten Orwellian, haven’t they? “Community standards” are what they say they are. Supposed democrat types have gotten increasingly totalitarian as time goes on. This banning from Facebook may be just the start of a general move to muzzle differing opinions coming from this website which, ironically, has covered the amnesia of previous generations of dissenting opinions that went against the official story line.

    • 回复: @anon
  33. @Timur The Lame

    Let’s see 1 + 25 + 84 = hmm . . .

    • 哈哈: Bubba
  34. Stump 说:

    Banned from Facebook? A badge of honor I”d say. The Unz Review along with Taki Mag and a few others are essentials for those seeking truth. Keep up the great work!!!

    • 同意: Morton's toes
  35. AaronB 说:

    It was always surprising to me how little criticism there was of this site in the mainstream – its like no one really took this site seriously. No one even really noticed this site. I used to do Google searches and come up with zilch.

    All the racism and Jew hatred was so obviously over the top and deranged that I guess no one felt threatened by it – the site was self-discrediting. I guess it’s a lesson that you have to be more subtle.

    But I guess now in a time of plague, whipping up peoples emotions and trying to create hate and anger and negativity can’t be so easily ignored – or so they think.

  36. @ Jim Bob Lassiter,

    Touche! I guess Edison is better than me at math also.

    干杯-

  37. @Michael888

    This is a solid comment, but I would replace the word “smart” to describe POTUS to “evil”. Very few people, assuming this hypothesis is true, have the capacity to be this evil…but after reading Blum, we knew these people did it to other countries repeatedly in the 20th century. No surprise here.

    Trump has completely dismantled the FBI leadership following the first Russian coup attempt against him. For my Christmas list, I can only wish the other evil three letter was next.

  38. Dumbo 说:
    @Bill Jones

    Well, I guess it wasn’t your own after all, was it?

    LOL. In Soviet America, media owns you.

    The thing about digital media is that you don’t really own anything. Google or Facebook have basically a monopoly on information and can just cancel or delete your stuff anytime.

  39. Pericles 说:
    @Divine Right

    Take, for instance, allegations the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) was involved in an illicit “skimming off the top” cocaine trafficking operation during the 1980s. I believe the implication was that they were turning a blind eye to drug traffickers in order to extract enough kickbacks from them to fund various anti-communist rebel operations in Central and South America against congressional funding restraint.

    One can only wonder who is running today’s drug business on the US side. It seems kind of fantastic that this enormous flow of illicit funds would just be ignored by the powers that be, and simply blaming ‘the cartels’ seems a bit lacking in explanatory power.

  40. Si1ver1ock 说:

    It’s getting harder to find quality news sources. Also, I’ve noticed some trolls at ZH and other places are getting very nasty. The 战争党 is having an effect with its hate campaigns.

    But there is some good news out there.

    1. The US Gov has admitted that the UFO footage shot by US fighter pilots is real. So whether you believe in aliens or not, the evidence of advanced physics is real and has been confirmed by the “authorities.”
    https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/18/politics/navy-confirms-ufo-videos-trnd/index.html

    2. Nuclear fusion is probably closer than you think, maybe only 5 to 10 years away. It’s aneutronic based, hydrogen/Boron 11, driven by Chirped Pulse Amplification (won a Nobel Prize in the mid 1980s) Extremely short pulsed (below nanoseconds) ultra high powered lasers.

    I’ve been going to 亚洲时报 for news, they have a series on aneutronic fusion.
    https://asiatimes.com/2020/05/lighting-the-nuclear-fusion-fire/

    Here is an article on COVID-19 and Gain Of Function.
    https://asiatimes.com/2020/05/monster-germ-protocol-comes-under-the-microscope/

    • 回复: @Jimmy the Swine
  41. anon[228]• 免责声明 说:
    @Graham Seibert

    Ido Aharoni, former consul general in New York, gave a webinar to the Streicker Center of Temple Emanu-El in New York today about threats to Israel and how they are changing. The elites aren’t working for us in the same way, he said, since the smartphone came along.

    ” In the old days, reality was mediated to us through the eys of a handful of people, the political leaders, the commentators, the pundits, the influencers, the VIPs of the old world. For example, Israel was pre 2007, the introduction of the first iphone– smartphone, Israel was mediated or communicated to the world through the eyes of people like Tom Friedman and Dennis Ross and of course the political leadership. And they were great people, they’re all still very active. It’s just that our voices– their voice is not being heard as before…”

    https://mondoweiss.net/2020/04/israeli-envoy-calls-tom-friedman-and-dennis-ross-spokesmen-for-israel-whove-now-been-replaced-by-an-algorithm/

  42. Adam Smith 说:

    同时,这种疾病自然会泄漏回美国,尽管发出了所有提前警告,但我们完全无能的政府却未能正确处理局势,造成了巨大的全国性健康灾难,经济崩溃,政治体系日趋衰落。

    I agree with your assessment about the criminal insanity and competence of “government”.

    I also think the “people of government” are more evil than you imagine.

    I do not believe this is merely incompetent mismanagement.

    Corona is not the cause of the economic collapse, simply the cover for it.

    Fearful, broke, indebted, hungry people are easier to corral than self sufficient, relaxed, well fed people who are lucky enough to have a nice garden, clean water, a roof over their head, some land under their feet, nice transportation and no debt.

    The media and “government” induced panicfest has caused this madness and chaos.

    Kudos to you for your “violation of community standards”.

    Carry on, kind sir.

    • 同意: fish, acementhead, St-Germain
    • 回复: @fish
  43. Chuckywiz 说:

    Under the new social order, it is crime to be truthful. What is Facebook anyway and how Mark Fuckerburg feel about the his subscribers, a bunch of idiots. I am glad that I read UNZ. Feels really good now.

  44. Ozymandias 说:

    all these American media sources agree that Chinese officials first became aware of the serious viral outbreak in Wuhan in early to mid-January

    Only a team of liars or dunces would agree on that, and only a liar or dunce would believe them. Are you bucking for a job as the Director of the World Health Organization?
    While I may agree that you have every right to post this opinion on Facebook, I grant the theory itself no credibility whatsoever. In December, Taiwan notified the World Health Organization that there was a severe viral outbreak in China. W.H.O. ignored it of course, and now were supposed to believe that China wasn’t aware of it until a month later. What absolute and utter bullshit. You’re really crapping the bed on this one, Ron.

    • 回复: @Erebus
  45. 鞭子肯定要下来了。

    We’ll be able to tell our grandchildren, ‘we were there.

    ‘We saw the new totalitarian order take its first baby steps.’

    …well, come to think of it, maybe we won’t be able to tell our grandchildren such things.

  46. From the 1800 hundreds— it’s worse now.

    “There is no such a thing in America as an independent press, unless it is out in country towns. You are all slaves. You know it, and I know it. There is not one of you who dares to express an honest opinion. If you expressed it, you would know beforehand that it would never appear in print. I am paid \$150 for keeping honest opinions out of the paper I am connected with. Others of you are paid similar salaries for doing similar things. If I should allow honest opinions to be printed in one issue of my paper, I would be like Othello before twenty-four hours: my occupation would be gone. The man who would be so foolish as to write honest opinions would be out on the street hunting for another job. The business of a New York journalist is to distort the truth, to lie outright, to pervert, to vilify, to fawn at the feet of Mammon, and to sell his country and his race for his daily bread, or for what is about the same — his salary. You know this, and I know it; and what foolery to be toasting an ‘Independent Press! We are the tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes. We are jumping-jacks. They pull the string and we dance. Our time, our talents, our lives, our possibilities, are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes.”
    ~John Swinton (1829–1901) was a Scottish-American journalist, newspaper publisher, and orator

    • 谢谢: Saggy
  47. Omegabooks 说:

    Would it have something to do with that article by that Israeli historian verifying that the 6 million holocaust number is not true? Hmmmmmm…..

  48. @T. Weed

    Ron Ron Ron, you’ve been jujitsu’d; your strengths have been used against you. Your mathematically keen intellect was offended by the lunacy of the propagandized version and you had to challenge it on that battle field.

    You picked the wrong battle.
    Your eyes locked on the wrong walnut shell.

    This “crisis” was never about a virus, not any more than WWII was about Hitler or the Dreyfuss affair was about a Jewish soldier.

    WTF do über zionists care about a bunch of dead old, fat people?

    The aide said that guys like me [Suskind] were “in what we call the reality-based community,” which he defined as people who “believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality.” I nodded and murmured something about enlightenment principles and empiricism. He cut me off. “That’s not the way the world really works anymore,” he continued. “We’re an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you’re studying that reality — judiciously, as you will — we’ll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that’s how things will sort out. We’re history’s actors … and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.” ** [The New York Times Magazine]

    The coronavirus was and is the distraction, the smokescreen, behind which the “reality creators” take complete control of American wealth, of all political power in USA and selected other locations; and total control of communications and surveillance.
    In his multi-volume biography of the Rothschilds, Niall Ferguson recorded that the family achieved its wealth by imposing tight control over information OUT, about the family’s dealings; and superior sources and control over information IN.

    Matt Taibbi posted this just yesterday:

    Earlier this week, Atlantic magazine – fast becoming the favored media outlet for self-styled intellectual elites of the Aspen Institute type – ran an in-depth article of the problems free speech pose to American society in the coronavirus era. The headline:

    互联网语音永远不会恢复正常

    在关于自由​​与控制全球网络的辩论中,中国在很大程度上是正确的,而美国是错误的。

    Quoting a paper authored by two professors, Jack Goldsmith (Harvard) and Andrew Keane Woods (University of Arizona), Taibbi wrote:

    They went on to list all the reasons that, given that we’re already on an “inexorable” path to censorship, a Chinese-style system of speech control may not be such a bad thing. In fact, they argued, a benefit of the coronavirus was that it was waking us up to “how technical wizardry, data centralization, and private-public collaboration can do enormous public good.” [read the rest, & weep]

    Atlantic is Facebook’s censorship operation.

    \$2 trillion into the hands of Mnuchin – Blackstone — just a coincidence?
    How was that necessitated by the deaths of some fat old people in a nursing home in Kirtland, WA, 10 miles from headquarters of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation?

    Bennie Gantz has a come-to-Jesus, er, Bibi moment and miraculously allies with the rival he’s been trying to unseat for months? — coincidence?

    Gerry Nadler and Adam Schiff maintaining radio silence? Why haven’t we heard from them? Were their roles limited to preparing groundwork for the Corona virus Jew Coup? (Yes, there are many non-Jews carrying water, but you better believe, the major share of the spoils will find their way into zionist hands and institutions.)

    Why was Jewish heroine Anne Schuchat summarily replaced by Gates & Gilead schills Fauci and Birx? Schuchat said “the virus is more contagious but less deadly than SARS;” she said, “we have it under control.” The day she was to be interviewed on Yahoo Finance, Mike Pence pulled her clearance and Fauci took the spotlight. (nb. what was the relationship between Arlen Specter, who opened wide the spigots to Fauci at NHS and also led the LGBTQ pandemic, & also sheltered Zalman Shapiro, who supplied uranium to Israel via NUMEC?)

    Are laundries “essential services,” because power brokers in TelAviv, DC and Wall Street have got to be staining more than the average number of undies in orgasmic joy over the spoils coming their way, from a war that did not see the deployment of a single Lockheed Martin or Boeing — or IDF — weapons system.

    Hell, even the Amish, for god’s sake, have been competing to see who can most quickly induce the American people to wear muzzles in public.

    You’ve gotta know that somewhere there are Jews fulfilling revenge fantasies over gold stars.

    This has been in the works for several years. I’ve posted the video of the talk David Goldman gave across the Potomac last May —

    Will China overtake the U.S. as the world’s leading superpower?

    Coronavirus is about a virus like the Orange Revolution was about citrus fruit.

    _____
    ** (I don’t think Karl Rove said that: Alan Kors explained Newton’s classification of “ants, spiders and bees:” spiders spin reality from the stuff in their heads, with no necessary connection to reality. Jews are the world’s spider thinkers. But that’s beside the point.)

  49. After I’ve read the Drudge Report and the Unz Review and the sites mentioned in each I’ve got a better grasp of current world affairs than the vast majority of NYTWaPoGlobeWSJFTABCNBCCBSNPRCNN… readers and viewers. keep up the good work, Mr. Unz. Illegitimi non carborundum! 😉

  50. fish 说:
    @Adam Smith

    Corona is not the cause of the economic collapse, simply the cover for it.

    Fearful, broke, indebted, hungry people are easier to corral than self sufficient, relaxed, well fed people who are lucky enough to have a nice garden, clean water, a roof over their head, some land under their feet, nice transportation and no debt.

    The system probably had no more than two or three years left….tops! Choosing the time of the crash allowed “important” people some preparation time and provided a convenient excuse for just why everything is just so sucky now (and into the far foreseeable future)!

    Remember that SS and Medicare you thought you were going to get…….

    • 同意: Adam Smith, Mr. Anon
    • 回复: @Adam Smith
  51. @alex in San Jose AKA Digital Detroit

    Alex, I’m amazed that I agree with you on something, but me too. I’ve never logged in to Faecebook, know so little about it I’m even uncertain how to spell the word. Is there or is there not an s before the b?

  52. My tracker tracker shows that you are collecting information for facebook right now. Perhaps unz can now ban facebook?

    • 同意: fish
    • 回复: @YetAnotherAnon
  53. JJS in AZ 说:

    Not saying you’re wrong here, because who knows, but the first death in China wasn’t in January, but early December at the latest. I got COVID 19 and, while it won’t kill me, it’s the second worst thing after the walking pneumonia/strep/thrush I got last year (by that history, one would expect that a 52 year old, fat, asthmatic wouldn’t make it, but what do you know? I did!).

    That all said. I contracted it at a convention in CA the week ending January 18. Two days before. China admitted they had a problem. There were, literally, hundreds of Chinese taking part, and most of them hailed from Hubei, based on the business cards I picked up. Not necessarily Wuhan, although they were there, but Hubei and other manufacturing centers. I don’t believe the official Chinese stats, at all. Multiply every diseased patient and every death by 10 or 20 and you’re probably a lot closer to the truth, especially when you consider that Chinese coal use never cratered but their electrical production did. They were cremating by the tens of thousands and one mortuary alone got 5,000 urns.

    None of this means to say that backfired biowarfare didn’t cause this, but using dates in January is meaningless, because even the Chineses no longer stick by that nonsense.

    • 回复: @jsinton
    , @Godfree Roberts
  54. Facebook has turned up the heat on me as well. I posted one of your articles just a few days ago and was immediately banned for 7 days. Apparently it wasn’t up to Facebook’s “community standards”. 🙂
    I read here on a regular bases and find your articles/essays intellectually stimulating.
    做得好!!

  55. Ozymandias 说:

    In some added irony, Facebook banned some people who highlighted Sweden’s strategy for addressing the pandemic. Now, the worthless gasbags at WHO have endorsed the Swedish strategy. So I guess Facebook will have to do a 180 and ban people who don’t agree with the Swedish strategy. Choke on it, Zuckerberg.

  56. Art 说:

    We all knew that this was coming – but it still hurts when it does. This is a true violation of our American patrimony.

    Our only choice is to continue “fighting the good fight.”

    Major kudos to you Ron Unz!

    Kudos to all your contributors also – they are now marked men and woman.

    艺术

  57. Curmudgeon 说:
    @animalogic

    But… but…but, muh 6 kagillion is worthy of unconditional defending!!!

  58. Curmudgeon 说:
    @anon

    Trump isn’t the NSA is. Perish any notion that Trump might be allowed to know what is going on in the NSA.

  59. Adam Smith 说:
    @fish

    Choosing the time of the crash allowed “important” people some preparation time and provided a convenient excuse

    我完全同意。

    I’ve been under no illusion about Medicare or SS. (Or the nature of “government”)

    I realized long ago (about 20 years ago) that I would never get anything out of SS or Medicare.

    The only thing “government” has ever offered me is slavery.
    I politely (and sometimes not so politely) decline.

    By the time I’m old enough* to collect anything we’ll all be enjoying UBI denominated in unicorn horns, living in utopia, where all the work is done by robots and all the necessities of life are free.

    Until then, I’ve got some work to do…

    感谢您的评论。

    I hope you enjoy your day.

    *I’m late Gen-X. I just sit 在场边 atop my mountain and watch the world burn.

  60. jsinton 说:
    @JJS in AZ

    I got COVID from my mother who went to bingo on January 22 and came home ill. My 85 year old mother survived with some difficulty, but I had the flu for a week and thought nothing of it. Later I realized I probably infected the first “known” case in my county. It’s been here for a while, we just didn’t know it.

  61. Curmudgeon 说:
    @Timur The Lame

    Your math aside, I disagree with Thomas Edison, the man who hired many to invent “his” patents. Plenty of people think, but the problem is indoctrination. The old saying “if the only tool you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail” is more appropriate. People everywhere are molded by their life experiences, but breaking your mold is the key to thinking differently.

  62. Wally 说:
    @animalogic

    说过:
    “That it’s total bullshit IS the point: the more grotesque the lies the more they must be unconditionally defended.”

    宾果!

    The best example is the fake & impossible “holocaust” narrative (aka: “The Big Lie”) being shoved own our throats 24/7/365 and the banning of free speech concerning it.

    只有谎言需要审查。

    • 同意: FLgeezer
    • 回复: @Wally
  63. Kali 说:
    @Kali

    So, the “reason” Facebook give for your ban, Mr Unz, is… the site (they say “this article”) “goes against community standards on 垃圾邮件设立的区域办事处外,我们在美国也开设了办事处,以便我们为当地客户提供更多的支持。“

    Because they can’t call it “fake news”.

    I’m off now to write a review of The Unz Review, detailing why I recommend every thinking man or woman to make use of this excellent platform.

    亲切的问候,
    卡利

    • 谢谢: Ann Nonny Mouse
  64. WJ 说:

    In the first paragraph, Mr Unz appears ok with censorship of the “cranks” but when it comes the UR it’s a different situation.

    That aside, this is a fabulous forum for cranks and wise people alike. Some of the conspiracy theories are bat crap crazy but still they have a voice and it’s greatly appreciated.

    • 同意: Gleimhart Mantooso
  65. Kolokol 说:

    Why not at least open a VK account or a Telegram channel and mirror your articles to them?

    • 同意: Eagle Eye
  66. American “Community Standards” and Chinese “Social Credit” – what’s the difference?

    Alternative theories about the origin of Coronavirus have been published in all the media – why should this site be treated differently?

    After all, many Americans might die if cranks or pranksters began promoting highly dubious cures to the deadly disease, perhaps even suggesting that people should inject themselves with Lysol to ward off an infection.

    Precisely. This example is also a good illustration of Americans’ common sense. The number of Americans who deliberately consumed bleach, believing it to be a cure for Coronavirus, is probably fewer than 10 – out of 330 million.

    https://reason.com/2020/04/28/the-myth-of-the-bleach-drinking-masses/

    Yet we are supposed to believe that Americans cannot adequately assess for themselves the output of this site, or that of Alex Jones. The Party believes that ordinary people need nice Mr Zuckerberg to filter their news for them.

  67. like i predicted.

    now, how long after Biden is elected until unz.com is scubbed from the internet? Ron, you better start finding some alternative hosting options. because it’s coming, for sure.

    i wonder if Steve Sailer has any idea who it is that got Unz banned from Facebook, and, with this knowledge, could he predict what might happen next, and how to react?

    probably not. he does not allow much discussion about what’s actually going on and (who) doesn’t want these ideas to exist, even on the internet.

  68. Wally 说:
    @St-Germain

    Yet Ron takes the bait and repeats another Leftist MSM lie / fake news:

    “perhaps even suggesting that people should inject themselves with Lysol to ward off an infection.”

    that Trump never said.

    假新闻再次罢工:特朗普从未说过要注射莱索尔或喝漂白剂:
    https://www.conservativedailynews.com/2020/04/fake-news-strikes-again-trump-never-said-to-inject-lysol-or-drink-bleach/

    • 同意: Gleimhart Mantooso
    • 回复: @meena
    , @anon
  69. Trickster 说:
    @Graham Seibert

    Mr. Unz needs to be circumspect and refrain from throwing rocks at glass houses. While this site “promotes” free speech it has also been known to “moderate” comments, meaning they are not published.

    Either you can say what you want or not but you cannot have it both ways. It is always a lark to see someone get a good dose of their own medicine and a Jew sticking it to another Jew is always a cause for a good snicker.

    • 同意: Realist
    • 回复: @Skeptikal
    , @Realist
    , @Bill Jones
  70. @AaronB

    I used to do Google searches and come up with zilch.

    From a very mainstream source:

    The New Censorship: How did Google become the internet’s censor and master manipulator, blocking access to millions of websites?

    You’ll find similar pieces published in the WSJCNBC’s website.

    All the racism and Jew hatred was so obviously over the top and deranged that I guess no one felt threatened by it – the site was self-discrediting.

    About one-third of the individuals that made the ADL’s “short list” for deplatforming are regular columnists here at UR. Recruiting an a-list actor/comedian to advocate for this censorship isn’t exactly the act of an ambivalent party.

    Nor is the militant campaign to punish Americans for engaging in a constitutionally-protected boycott 以色列。

    I guess … But I guess now …

    You don’t “guess” at all. You know what you’re doing and so do most of the commenters here.

    Thankfully, it’s all very transparent.

  71. anon[368]• 免责声明 说:

    Ron, as a rich guy, you are particularly well suited to initiate a legal battle against FB for tortious interference. These companies *能够* be beaten, and beaten *soundly* as the author Vox Day has demonstrated. Especially because you will need the assistance of your readers to defeat them, and you have a very large, very engaged reader base. Seriously, talk to Vox. Fight back. It’ll be fun.

  72. A week or so agon a friend sent me a YouTube link to a discussion by a pair of doctors who questioned the wisdom of the federal response and may have spoken about the origin. I donoo’t know because Youtube quickly took the video down. Thus do things happen here in China. The US, I meant to say.

    • 回复: @Peripatetic Commenter
  73. Skeptikal 说:
    @Trickster

    Actually, this incident highlights not only that the Unz Review blog is privately owned (obviously), but also—which may not be so obvious to billions of FB users—that Facebook, too, is privately owned.

    One can only hope that the nullification of the Unz Review on FB will cause more people to make their way to the horse’s mouth.

    To me it has always seemed absurd that any entity that has its own weblog/page/site etc. would duplicate itself on Facebook. But to me the whole social media universe is terra incognita: not only have I never trod there, I don’t even think about it.

    So I guess this FB expungement might be a terrible turn of events, and it certainly is important, but I can’t help thinking . . . uh, well, actually, what do you expect? I wonder whether any media watchdogs such as the Columbia Journalism Review will pick up this story, or will they, too, bury the story as FB is apparently attempting to bury UR on its pages.

    • 回复: @trickster
  74. lloyd 说: • 您的网站
    @The King is a Fink

    He could but I don’t think he will. Social Media own all the intellectual rights of their posts as a public wall owns all the posters stuck on it but can’t be sued for them. He appears to concede he may have crossed the line in social media. One solace, Facebook and the other social media giants appear half hearted about censorship. As a Christian Saint wrote, out of the blood of martyrs spring more martyrs. I get the feeling there are secret allies for freedom of speech in Facebook etc. They only censor when compelled to. They are forced to analyse dissident speech and start to agree with some of it. In East Germany, Government censors became in the forefront of dissidence for same reason. And never forget America is English speaking. Freedom of speech in English common law predates the State and is a natural right. In Europe, freedom of speech under Roman law is a limited right given by the Government In Asia, it is a foreign import.

  75. Eagle Eye 说:

    恩兹先生

    Maybe you should seriously consider actually suing FB, on the basis that it is a “common carrier” providing a service to the general public. You are perhaps the best-placed person in America to bring such an action.

    “Common carrier” and similar doctrines have long been recognized under California and federal law. (Federal courts do apply California law in certain cases.) The USPS is required to carry all mail, including communist newsletters etc. The same would apply to a private service such as FedEx. Why not Facebook?

    U.S. District Judge Lucy Ko (“Northern” District of California i.e. Bay Area) strongly hinted in a decision a few years back that censorship by social media could be subject to review under common carrier doctrines. (In that case, the plaintiffs had failed to assert any common-carrier type claims.)

    The WSJ/Economist choir will, of course, scream about the sanctity of “private” entities, but that has not been the real American tradition since at least 1880.

    Another underappreciated area of law for these purposes lies in the area of anti-trust law. FB, Twitter, Google, Apple etc. clearly maintain direct communications and cooperate to ban certain content to protect favored narratives. This collusion violates long-established anti-trust principles.

    Of course, you and your advisors would need to consider carefully the risks to you and to them in going up against 事实上的 government entities.

  76. Like I mentioned in an earlier reply to Mr. Unz, the origins of this pandemic are interesting, but it is the response of the many governments of the world and the blatant fearmongering of the MSM and censorship by social media giants to steer the direction of public discussion and policy debate that would make for a great American Pravda piece.

  77. meena 说:

    Your message couldn’t be sent because it includes content that other people on Facebook have reported as abusive.”
    This message shows up when one tries to share and click the button above left to the twitter under the declines .

    All it need is 30 bot describing UNZ as “abusive” .

    Problem is that there are many countries outside West Europe and Israel and they dont do anything . Those countries can easily ban the Facebook until it agrees not to listen to creepy people from those countries . Can the religious leaders of muslim countries start a religious wars against Facebook ? It can. ( But both the bribed and paid liberals and conservatives will start screaming – calling it another Rushdie affair whose book probably commissioned by the Zio)

  78. @AaronB

    You said this not long ago:

    “To realize that we cannot know anything has always been recognized as the greatest wisdom.”

    Let me spell it out for you: If you think we cannot know anything, then, STFU, m’kay?

  79. @BuelahMan

    Pro wrestling, gaming the public all the way. And how easy this is, n’est-ce pas AK?

  80. In the mid-1990s there was a great debate about what this new Internet thingy would mean.

    Would it be the beginning of a great awakening of a global intelligence that was freed from censorship around the world?

    Perhaps every world problem could be solved, now that every person’s opinions and suggestions could compete in a free marketplace of ideas.

    There were a very few voices warning that this would and could never happen, that the powers that be would have to figure out a way to censor people and regain their thousands of years of control over information.

    The Internet itself would force the rulers’ masks to come off, and to declare war on ideas that failed to comply with official narratives.

    I tended to doubt the Unz thesis that the US was ultimately responsible for the virus–but the censors are beginning to convince me.

    Censoring lies is not what they do because lies can be overcome with data and evidence–censoring truth is the trademark of elites everywhere and always.

  81. Eagle Eye 说:
    @Bill Jones

    Angela Merkel’s [Stasi] could only have your nearest and dearest spying on you. In the US you spy on yourself.

    Time to bring back a hoary Cold War line:

    “In America, you watch television. In Soviet Union, television watch you.”

  82. David Icke has been banned from FB on the same day, and an interview removed from YouTube. Coronavirus related.

  83. Sorry to hear this. More and more censorship of opinions and facts that certain groups of Tech giants don’t like.

    Zuckerberg is highly leveraged with the Gates Foundation through the COVID-19 Therapeutics Accelerator initiative.

    These folks are all part of the hysterical (but powerful) Left which adores China. Evelyn de Rothschild in more than one interview over the years made bold statements of Praise towards Asia and China in particular; his wife is best friends with Hillary C.

    Klaus Schwab, leader/founder of World Economic Forum (WEF), recently stated that China was in the best position to move the world forward into a high tech civilization/system (If I can find that article I’ll post it, but it was recent). The WEF also has links with Gates.

    Gates & Zuckerberg are two of the worse psychopaths on the planet now.

    If there was some kind of Chinese Bio-warfare in all of this, I’d lay bets that it was in conjunction with the Leftists in the West.

  84. @Buzz Baldrin

    Intteresting. I clicked on the link to the site in the body of your story and got the following screen:

    警告
    将您引向此处的网站不是Facebook页面。 如果您在上一个站点上输入了Facebook登录信息,则需要重设密码。
    To learn more about staying safe on the internet, visit our Security Page. You can also check out the phishing Wikipedia article.

    That would be enough to scare any Facebook normie who clicked on a link to your site.

    • 回复: @PNWmossback
    , @Skeptikal
  85. Wally 说:
    @anon

    – So give us the name of anyone you think would be a better US President and tell us why.

    • 同意: Getaclue
  86. @PNWmossback

    …Intteresting. I clicked on the link to the site in the body of your story …

    My error. I meant to say the link to the Facebook page in Ron’s post.

  87. Art 说:

    I discovered that all material from The Unz Review had suddenly been banned for alleged violations of “community standards” and our own Facebook page eliminated.

    Hmm — the 240-year-old “community standard” in America is to publish political speech. UR is not screaming “fire” in a crowded theater. Because UR’s content is “different from the norm,” it is news, and therefor important and publishable. Not publishing UR information is a dereliction of a general news publisher’s duties. UR is a letter to the editor. Contrary opinions must be published.

    Facebook is not using America’s founding “community standard” in shutting down UR.

    There must be some way to get that idea into the law.

  88. @Michael888

    The CIA, on the other hand, are never held accountable for their mistakes.

    You spelled ‘crimes’ incorrectly. But it’s such an easy mistake to make that you are forgiven.

  89. @JJS in AZ

    美国国家卫生研究院所长弗朗西斯·柯林斯说,这种病毒可能已经在人类中传播了数年甚至数十年之久,而没有引起可察觉的爆发。

    Collins, a physician-geneticist, is noted for his landmark discoveries of disease genes and his leadership of the international Human Genome Project. He served as director of the National Human Genome Research Institute at NIH from 1993-2008. Before coming to NIH, Dr. Collins was a Howard Hughes Medical Institute investigator at the University of Michigan. He is an elected member of the National Academy of Medicine and the National Academy of Sciences, was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom in November 2007, and received the National Medal of Science in 2009.
    https://www.scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3081959/coronavirus-outbreak-france-did-not-come-directly-china-gene

    CNN主持人克里斯·库莫(Chris Cuomo)说,他相信会有消息表明这种新型冠状病毒最早将于XNUMX月在美国传播。 克里斯蒂娜(Cristina)认为,这些孩子现在轶事了,在过去的几个月中,至少有两个孩子患有这种疾病。 为什么? 我们不知道,但非典型的长期窦,发烧,嗜睡。 我认为我们将要知道,自从XNUMX月以来,就已经有冠状病毒出现在这个国家了,”库莫说。 “而且你们俩都知道,而且我一直在全国各地听到,您听到多少人说:'我想我拥有了,我拥有了这个和这个,我失去了嗅觉和这个,并且那,但我从未得到测试'? 这些案件在全国各地都很普遍。”他补充说。 https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/chris-cuomo-predicts-evidence-will-show-coronavirus-was-spreading-in-us-since-october.

    P.S. Do you doubt 所有 these figures, too?

    • 同意: Jeremygg5
    • 谢谢: Olivier1973
    • 回复: @anon
    , @Ann Nonny Mouse
  90. Censorship Continues. Facebook Permanently Deleted SouthFront’s Page
    1年2020月XNUMX日

    亲爱的朋友们,

    SouthFront once again became a target of corporate censorship. On April 30, Facebook permanently deleted our page (LINK) with about 100,000 followers.

    This is not the first time, when SouthFront becomes a target of the technical and propaganda pressure campaign. On April 9, Facebook placed limits on SouthFront’s page claiming that its activities “don’t comply with Facebook’s policies.” (LINK)

    On July 21, 2015, Facebook deleted our previous used to inform people about the conflict in eastern Ukraine, Syria and other key developments around the world. (LINK)

  91. snag 说:

    Yesterday (04.30.20) Facebook removed Gilad Atzmon “Is Amnesia a Symptom of Covid-19?” from my timeline and links on private contacts.

  92. Balaji 说:

    Congratulations Mr. Unz! Your suggestion does seem plausible. I don’t know if it is true or not. But it does deserve to be discussed. The Facebook censorship only increaes your credibility.

  93. meena 说:
    @Wally

    Trump if really pressed hard will say he was never a president . It’s a fake news .

    • 回复: @Wielgus
  94. anon[361]• 免责声明 说:
    @Godfree Roberts

    It would be interesting to know if people who participated in the MuddyUp sponsored by Boys and Girls Club of Greenwich, CT (BGCG) on Sept 29, 2019 are now experiencing Covid-19.

    我在那里。
    The next day had typical cold symptoms — scratchy throat, runny nose, congestion in sinuses and upper respiratory but not lungs.
    It lasted about 2 weeks. Not debilitating to the point of flat-on-back but not able to carry out my normal work, which demands physical exertion.

    The current round of flu-like infection has not touched me at all.

    Wonder if BGCG staffers or other MuddyUp participants had the same symptoms then, and what they’re experiencing now.

  95. @Godfree Roberts

    Thanks for that, Dr Roberts. The evidence speaks for itself, loudly. That is a mind-blowing graph!

  96. Anonymous[425]• 免责声明 说:
    @An Endangered Species

    I guess, these days, being banned is something of a badge of honor.

    In the 80s and 90s, certain Chinese movies were marketed in art houses as BANNED IN CHINA.

    Today, a whole bunch of news could be promoted as BANNED BY GLOB.

  97. @Godfree Roberts

    Dr Roberts, from this little phone your “(LINK)” entries are non-functional. Please type in the URL or even the full anchor markup. They work here.

    • 回复: @Godfree Roberts
  98. anon[191]• 免责声明 说:
    @Wally

    Did you get some PPP money ? Lot of Trump concerts lobbyists and campaigners got . Its called free money . It is dole to the beggars panhandling at the Wall Street corners with MAGA hat . That is something won’t happen even in Venezuela

    “At the top of the list were luxury hotels run by the Bennett family. They received more PPP money than any other donor known so far. The Bennetts have given liberally to Trump and the GOP. Also receiving these loans that don’t have to be repaid was a firm connected to a lobbyist and Trump fundraiser; also, Continental Materials Corp; Easy Post and several other Trump and GOP benefactors. This smacks of corruption.” 反击网

    Resort business ? Doesn’t Trump own a few who will try to qualify as small business to get some PPP?

  99. Jim Given 说:

    The lights are going out all over the West.

    The Victorian standard of censorship is still being reinforced: One can publish genuine dissenting opinion on Websites (like the Unz Review), but not in the Mainstream. Facebook belongs to the Mainstream.

    When the Websites themselves close, nothing remains except the New Dark Age.

    The future is feudal. Tightly controlled. Big Brothered. And a new Dark Age-

    • 同意: Skeptikal
  100. Skeptikal 说:
    @PNWmossback

    “To learn more about staying safe on the internet”

    “staying safe” on the internet?

    WTF does that mean??

    Internet gonna get yo mama??

    I might see something “unsafe” that will harm widdoo me and widdoo me’s bwain?

    Insufferable!

    Just leave me alone, Nanny Net.

  101. @Ann Nonny Mouse

    Fecesbook! Love it! I’m stealing that. If someone asks me if I’m on it, I’ll say, “Fecesbook? Nah, I’m not into scatology”.

  102. Skeptikal 说:
    @Godfree Roberts

    ” “don’t comply with Facebook’s policies.”

    Make that “politics.”

    I have often watched Southfront’s videos, when linked at The Saker blog.

    I have found them to be well made and very informative.

    As far as I can tell, they don’t actually present a point of view.

    They seem to be presented in a “just the facts, ma’am” fashion, with a voice-over style that is neutral in the extreme—almost monotonic— and with clear graphics and animations to show the geographical and tactical details and of the back and forth in Syria that otherwise are hard to grasp and place on a map.

    I cannot imagine any pretext for banning Southfront or taking it down!

    This is really nuts!

    But it is a perfect example why it is also nuts to rely on Facebook as a platform for . . . anything, really. Again, it seems to be better for people just to get used to going Southfront.org and just bypass FB. To me, using FB to get somewhere else is like a huge unnec. detour. And why would you go to, say, the New York Times to read items produced by the Wall Street Journal? Just go to the WSJ.
    The compelling nature of FB continues to elude me.

    Why do alternative sites keep blaring out at the bottom of the home page “Follow us on FB”??

    That is like saying: Leave our site and go somewhere else (where your eyeballs are sold to the highest bidder and all of your data is also mined and monetized).

    Why why why???

    I just don’t get it . . .

  103. ‘The Unz Review Suddenly Banned by Facebook!’

    On the bright side, now you know they really care.

  104. @Ann Nonny Mouse

    Sorry, I don’t have them but, if you google the opening phrase it should bring up the page with live links

  105. Erebus 说:
    @Ozymandias

    In December, Taiwan notified the World Health Organization that there was a severe viral outbreak in China. W.H.O. ignored it of course…

    I couldn’t find another source for either point in your claim. Got anything to back that up?

    • 回复: @Ozymandias
  106. Anonymous[509]• 免责声明 说:
    @Bert

    Mr. Unz, your hypothesis of a U.S. biological attack has not seemed convincing to me

    US most likely didn’t do it as the US isn’t ruled and controlled by national leaders, national representatives, and national agents. US is to Jewish power what India had once been to British Imperialism. So, even if the agents who spread the disease in China were from the US, it’d be misleading to say the US did it. Rather, it was rogue or special agents of globalism. While Jews aren’t the only agents of globalism, they are certainly the most powerful with most connections and sway. Also, whatever Jews do is automatically shielded and covered up by the media, US politicians, and US agencies. Suppose there is evidence that does point to the Jews. Will the likes of Lindsey Graham and Tom Cotton call for investigation into Jewish Power? No, they will be silent and ignore it… or work to suppress the evidence.. and so will the CIA, NSA, and FBI, all cuck agencies of globalism. While US media howl about Russia, Russia, Russia, they were mostly mum about Israel tapping US phones in DC. And even US intelligence agencies didn’t make much of it.

    https://www.richardsilverstein.com/2019/09/12/israeli-intelligence-spied-on-trumps-cell-phone-calls/

    Suppose British imperialist agents in India hatched a plot against another nation or government. Would it be fair to say ‘India did it’? Of course not. Rather, it would be the work of British Empire operating from India. Consider how Arnon Milchan worked across Israel, US, Europe, Africa, and etc. He’s a global agent whose main loyalty is to Jewish supremacism. There are many globalists just like him. Many are Jewish supremacists and others are cuck-collaborators(who are rewarded handsomely, much like the Chinese in British Hong Kong), most of whom are Anglos. It is right to call this master-servant relationship the Anglo-Zionist network.

    Because the US government is a puppet government, a covid plot hatched by globalists need not have gone through the official circles. Indeed, the real power in US agencies are not with the heads or chiefs of agencies but with movers and shakers behind the scenes. Why don’t officials and managers try to flush the system of these ‘rogue’ elements? Because the roguers are ‘made men’, protected men.
    It’s like in CASINO the movie. Why doesn’t the casino expose the people who come and go and rob the place? Because those guys are working for the real power behind the operation. The ‘board of directors’ remain clueless. The industry looks the other way while men come to skim money from the place for organized crime.

    Surely, there are men in CIA, FBI, NSA, and etc who know fishy stuff is happening, but they gotta remain mum because Jewish Power is ‘made’. Why is it that Milchan can walk around as a free man in the US even though he admitted, even boasted, of having stolen US secrets? Why were the Dancing Israelis and certain Saudi element allowed to leave the US following 9/11? Dancing Israelis were held and questioned for awhile, and there were promising leads… but suddenly, it was all closed and they were allowed to return to Israel. Made Men.

    Globalists are pushing a narrative of US vs China, but it’s really the Glob vs US and China, the difference being that, while US is totally controlled by globalism, China isn’t yet, at least totally. US, or White America, went from the controller of globalism to controlled by globalism, which is now mostly Jewish-supremacist.

    But no one in the US dares say anything about Jewish power, and even the Chinese, who surely know all about Jewish Power, dare not mention Jewish Power because it’s such an absolute taboo in the West.

    Now, it’s very likely Covid came from some Chinese lab, but there are some fishy details, and IF it was used against China by a foreign power, it would be wrong to say the US did it EVEN IF those agents operated within the US. Just like Trump and Flynn had no idea what the deep state was cooking up against them, most of US government is actually in the dark about what is REALLY being hatched and carried out by elements of shadow government that infect all layers of the government. It could be in the form of AIPAC goons pressuring all politicians to sign the pledge to Israel. It could be Jewish lawyers working behind the scenes to have BDS banned. Or Wall Street guys making sure politicians dole out the bailout money.

    This shadow power is awesome but remains vague, just like Youtube and Facebook terms of services. Vaguer they are, the more leeway the Power has to shut people down and justify just about any action. It’s downright kafkaesque with the caveat that kafkaism went from a Jewish warning about goy tyranny to the Jewish blueprint of tyranny over goyim and dissident Jewish voices who don’t go with the program.

    • 同意: Miro23
    • 回复: @Ron Unz
    , @Miro23
  107. Ron Unz 说:
    @Anonymous

    I should probably clarify something implicit in my analysis but that I never made absolutely explicit…

    I think the evidence suggests a strong likelihood that the Coronavirus outbreak was an American biowarfare attack against China (and Iran). But if so, it would have been carried out by elements of the American national security establishment rather than by “the American government,” which is an important distinction.

    For example, based upon the behavior of President Donald Trump during the last few months, I’d say there’s a 0.000% chance that he himself either authorized the biowarfare attack or was even ever made aware of it. This isn’t so surprising since Trump obviously doesn’t control his own government, as shown by the fact that quite a number of his closest friends and allies have been sent to prison for helping to elect him in 2016.

    I’d assume that the culprits are the Deep State Neocons whom Trump, for reasons only he can understand, has appointed to so many top positions in his own administration.

    If a normal country like Russia or China carried out a biowarfare attack, we could be sure that the top leadership was behind it, or at least was informed of the plans. But these days, America is most certainly not a normal country…

    • 同意: T. Weed, St-Germain, John Wear
    • 不同意: GazaPlanet
  108. Jake 说:
    @SwinolaDiBasso

    The small business now folding because of the quarantining almost invariably are owned by Trump voters. The few owned by blacks or white w0men or Moslems will get special bail outs restricted to anybody but white men.

    So it is more than convenient for both Liberals and Neocons that we’ve had the closures, the vast majority of which were not required.

    Until the white middle class is reduced to a need to beg for scarp jobs, it can be a threat to the Elites.

  109. Jake 说:
    @Ron Unz

    If this is a US biowarfare gambit gone bad, then your assessment that Trump was left out of the loop is almost certainly true.

    More and more, I think it was the US Deep State playing biowarfare.

    • 回复: @Miro23
  110. Averell 说:

    But a few days later, Israeli television mentioned that in November American intelligence had indeed shared such a report on the Wuhan disease outbreak with its NATO and Israeli allies, thus seeming to independently confirm the complete accuracy of the original ABC News story and its several government sources.

    When you are on Facebook, you must serve NATO’s agenda or you’re flushed.

    Facebook and The Atlantic Council Unite: Now Social Media Giant Serves NATO’s Agenda:

    https://www.globalresearch.ca/facebook-and-the-atlantic-council-unite-now-social-media-giant-serves-natos-agenda/5641322

    – The partnership between Facebook and the Atlantic Council is an attempt to ensure the grip of dominant imperialist powers – militaries,..

    – Facebook Censorship and the Atlantic Council – Global Research

  111. aandrews 说:
    @An Endangered Species

    There’s supposedly a name you can simply say on YouTube, or publish on Facebook, that’ll get your content instantly banned. Evidently it’s the name of an ex-CIA guy who is the “Ukraine whistleblower”.

    But the supposed name of the whistleblower has been circulating in conservative corners of social media since at least Oct. 3, culminating in Trump Jr.’s Wednesday morning retweet of a Breitbart News article that named an individual. During one 24-hour period last week, the CIA officer’s name was mentioned in more than 150,000 tweets.

    Joe Rogan Experience #1465 – Tim Pool

    • 回复: @David riskanalyst
  112. anon[171]• 免责声明 说:
    @Ron Unz

    “ whom Trump, for reasons only he can understand, has appointed to so many top positions in his own administration.”

    Blackmailing of worst nature ? Only his son in law knows .

    • 回复: @Ron Unz
    , @Miro23
  113. Averell 说:
    @Ron Unz

    Most probably they deleted your page because most of your articles express opinions which are against NATO’s objectives: discredit Russia, bash Iran, intimidate US citizens with a military-police surveillance complex.

    (I had many pages under different pseudos,and they were all deleted by Facebook. I followed Global Research, Unz, and Sibel Edmonds. I alway stayed polite, trying to ask why they were, in my opinion, staying totally silent on topics like Libya, Syria, Venezuela. The CBC canadian state-owned corporation was particularly allergic to my posts, which they systematically blocked or deleted. The [电子邮件保护]@@!! then tell us with their ridiculous reports that Canada is a democracy, while they sell BILLIONS in weapons to the Saudi, back narco-human trafficking states like Kosovo, back rebels affiliated with Al-Quaeda in Libya, back the White Helmets using Facebook, back SS torching humans in the Ukraine on Facebook. It’s clear that Facebook belongs to NATO, people should all delete their account and get a life!)

    “On Thursday, the social network announced how it was “excited to launch a new partnership with the Atlantic Council […] Mark Zuckerberg’s team has essentially made their company a tool of the US military agenda.

    Just look at who funds the Atlantic Council: donors include military contractors such as Lockheed Martin, Boeing and Raytheon, all of whom directly profit from tensions with powers like Russia and China. Meanwhile, in addition to NATO itself, there are also payments made by the US State Department, along with bungs from the US Air Force, Army, Navy and Marines.

    Other major paymasters include the government of the United Arab Emirates, which is, of course, an absolute monarchy. And more UAE cash comes via the Abu Dhabi state oil company and Crescent Petroleum. Not to be outdone, Morocco, again not noted for its freedoms, also throws significant coin into the bucket.”

    FROM: Facebook and The Atlantic Council Unite: Now Social Media Giant Serves NATO’s Agenda

    https://www.globalresearch.ca/facebook-and-the-atlantic-council-unite-now-social-media-giant-serves-natos-agenda/5641322

    https://www.globalresearch.ca/facebook-and-the-atlantic-council-unite-now-social-media-giant-serves-natos-agenda/5641322

  114. Bronek 说:
    @Michael888

    Thank you for those interesting comments. In my travels around Mother Earth’s neighborhoods, intellectuals in various countries thought the FBI and CIA were little more than criminal organizations. Those eliciting the commentary were pro-American. Now we are seeing the Comey and Gen. Flynn affair and most fearing any mention of the Big O.

  115. MEH 0910 说:

    史蒂夫·塞勒(Steve Sailer) 转推了:

    https://www.unz.com/isteve/mit-technology-review-wayback-machine-archive-is-interfering-with-desired-100-memoryholing-of-unwanted-old-content/

  116. Wally 说: • 您的网站
    @anon

    – No doubt neo-Marxist led Facebook doesn’t want information which challenges the MSM version of the CV19 ‘pandemic’.

    – However, I believe the biggest reason for the attacks on https://www.unz.com is the fact that Ron Unz, a Jew, not only allows free speech on the fake “holocaust” narrative, but he actually writes revisionist articles debunking it, and he publishes research by others who do the same.

    That is taboo on a narrative which simply cannot withstand scientific, rational scrutiny.

    干杯。

  117. @Godfree Roberts

    It’ll be bad when WORDPRESS.org starts censoring websites that use it’s platform.

    A lot of Alt media uses wordpress.

    • 回复: @Colin Wright
  118. Ron Unz 说:
    @anon

    “ whom Trump, for reasons only he can understand, has appointed to so many top positions in his own administration.”

    Blackmailing of worst nature ? Only his son in law knows .

    Possibly. But I think a more likely explanation is that he’s just a totally ignorant buffoon, whom his advisors can lead around by the nose.

    Soon after he was unexpectedly elected, the Deep State Neocons managed to use their media power to get rid of his existing advisors and substitute themselves instead. And they’ve mostly been running his administration since then.

    Trump was a successful Reality TV star and Kim Kardashian is also a successful Reality TV star. Suppose Kim Kardashian somehow became president. How would she decide upon government policies?

  119. Anonymous[373]• 免责声明 说:

    Can someone please start an open-minded social media site?

    I know there are some, but they are not widely used.

    And who are the censors in Facebook etc.?

    They’re probably liberals, LGBTQ, a certain (ahem) ethno/religious groups, and foreigners who are offended by anything to the right of Trotsky.

    Will Facebook appoint politically unbiased censors?

    Another means of censorship is that web service hosters are pressured to kick off entirely reasonable websites.

    • 回复: @KA
  120. Unz, you are totally great. You don’t need FB. I’ve been on FB for about 12 years, but I don’t use them as a news or article source – I go directly to the website.

  121. d dan 说:
    @Ozymandias

    Hahaha, fake news generated by the anti-China clowns in Taiwan, now taken seriously by the usual western trolls.

    Listen to a real Taiwanese explaining this so-called “Taiwan notifies WHO” crap:

  122. @T. Weed

    Facebook was established by 2 men who made the mistake of employing Zuckerberg as a programmer. He simply changed the password and locked them out of their own business. They eventually came to terms and he paid compensation of some millions (I don’t remember how much or their names). I didn’t mind Facebook for keeping in touch occasionally but was annoyed by constant changes. I didn’t accept letting a thief have control of the right to free speech so I stopped using it. [电子邮件保护].

    • 回复: @Gleimhart Mantooso
    , @anon
  123. Jax 说: • 您的网站

    I have posting Unz articles on FuckBook. The ban is of the site. Content seems irrelevant, since this site covers a wide range of opinion, both left and right. Truly a badge of honor, which will increase the number of people coming to your site, just to see what all the fuss is about….LOL.

  124. @Ron Unz

    “ Suppose Kim Kardashian somehow became president. How would she decide upon government policies?”

    She would pull them out of her ample ass.

  125. Erebus 说:
    @Ozymandias

    You linked to a Bing search page. Not very helpful of you, but I checked the 1st ten sites that came up for the hell of it. Not one said anything of the sort.

    One hopes you can come up with a specific link to a credible source. Otherwise, check your bedsheets.

    • 回复: @Ozymandias
  126. Being banned by Facebook (or YouTube, or Twatter) is only effective if those three shitholes are important revenue streams: since Unz Review doesn’t have a subscription or ad-rev model, this ban only has upside.

    They’ve guaranteed you a spike in traffic, and additional notoriety. That always happens – for shoestring operations it’s a huge negative to have traffic spiking at the same time as being demonetised (e.g., Sargon of Akkad; Paul Joseph Watson etc).

    Doubtless the weepy scrawny little faggot at Patreon will probably make life difficult for Unz writers … iSteve and others ought to have smelled to coffee long ago, and diversified away from those parasitic cocksuckers led by a pretentious cunt whose fagginess is measured in yottaCucks. (PATREON DELENDA EST).

    The only downside is that ‘social media’ bans also generally mean a spike in DDoS attempts (from nappies who think DDoS is edgy). This is useful again because shoestring operations are vulnerable to that sort of thing, because they don’t use CloudFlare or other CDNs with (some) DDoS protection.

    The only thing genuinely worth worrying about, is to ensure that the WordPress installation is up to scratch: the default WP DB setup used to be hugely vulnerable (it’s much much better over the last 5 years).

    Apart from that: look forward to “Banned in Boston” meets “Streisand Effect”.

    Also: it might be worth harnessing 20 or so regulars to use URL shorteners and post URL-shortened Unz stuff in comment threads all over Facebook; we did that when Wikileaks was getting scrubbed after ‘Collateral Murder’.

  127. @Ron Unz

    Reducing Trump to merely a reality TV star, and “therefore he’s comparable to Kim Kardashian” is very weak.

  128. @Ron Unz

    我们都在思考'历史上的握手' 最近。

    2020 年重要握手的候选人将是 你和乔罗根在 3 小时的播客后握手.

    您的武汉流感材料非常有趣(我不同意您对其严重程度的评估),而且非常及时和相关。

    罗根非常擅长让他的客人不间断地陈述他们的立场。

    Rogan’s audience doesn’t listen with the podcast on for background noise: they .

    我将开始在 JRE 方面鼓动……我真的希望这发生。

  129. @Donald A Thomson

    If those brothers would’ve asked me, I’d have been happy to wring that password out of Zuckerberg.

  130. Max Payne 说:

    Eh. No big loss. Facebook should not be your only means of communication or news.

  131. JackOH 说:

    Free advice department, Ron.

    Run a full-page open letter in Bay Area newspapers addressed to Facebook/Zuckerberg. Accept the advice of legal counsel in drafting it. Urge FB to become a good corporate citizen that embraces the spirit of the First Amendment and the capacity of the marketplace of ideas to sort out truth. Hint that legal remedies may be available (if indeed they are available).

    You’ll draw in a few new readers just on the strength of your willingness to take a public swing at the FB leviathan, plus you’ll give FB’s management a moment’s pause. There’s likely to be a down side, which you’d have to judge.

    It’s just a thought. I’ve never used Facebook, so I don’t know of its value to online publishing.

    • 回复: @Dave Bowman
  132. Renoman 说:

    Telling the truth will always be difficult. Keep up the great work Ron, we need you.

  133. Bert 说:
    @Ron Unz

    Assignment of responsibility for criminal activity requires meeting three criteria: means, motive and opportunity.

    Dispensing with opportunity first, any government or rogue individual could have flown to Wuhan and released SARS-2. The military games would not be necessary; if anything they would be a useful diversion by allowing disaffected Americans to argue that the U.S. was the culprit.

    For means, if one assumes that SARS-2 was first studied in a level 4 virology lab and subsequently released, then the U.S., China and Israel meet the first aspect of this criterion. There is, however, a second aspect of means. The laboratory’s virus must be accessible to those tasked with its introduction into the human population. Of the three countries, access would be guaranteed to Chinese and Israeli labs assuming that either of those governments were behind the release. Access by “Deep State” agents to U.S. viral stocks would be much less probable because multiple administrative levels in bioresearch would need to bribed or coerced.

    For motive, if the U.S. intended to cripple China, then it would have been prepared not to be crippled itself. It would have had all necessary PPE, would probably have an effective ani-viral drug available, and most of all would have immediately instituted a legally enforced stringent lockdown. As to Israel, why would it want to cripple China, most especially if there was a high risk that its cash cow slash colony, the U.S., would be driven towards bankrupcy and social upheaval that would put Jews and ZOG in danger. There is no logical reason that the U.S., Israel, or the “deep state” would have released the virus.

    If one choses to believe that SARS-2 was deliberately released, motive points to China. It acted decisively to control the epidemic within its borders, and could have predicted based on epidemiological modeling that with social distancing, testing, contact tracing and quarantine, that the virus could be controlled. And despite the effectiveness of these measures, it could surely have expected that once the virus reached the U.S. a crippling cluster-f**k would ensue, given that the U.S is a decentralized, socially-divided, ethnically-challenged, scientifically-ignorant nation. Its motive could simply have been to leapfrog over the U.S. in its quest for hegemony.

    I don’t know whether the virus jumped naturally from a bat population, or escaped from a Wuhan lab, or was deliberately released in Wuhan. But I do know that believing “deep state” American actors were responsible for a release does not meet the criteria of inference that have been routinely used by police detectives for one hundred years.

    • 同意: foolisholdman, Alden
    • 不同意: Biff
  134. Wielgus 说:
    @Boomertechnocrat

    Even when jamming radio signals, the USSR tended to leave at least one radio wavelength unjammed because it wanted to monitor the broadcasts. Essentially it sought to complicate listening to foreign broadcasts from unfavoured sources rather than prevent it altogether. There may be a similar process at work here.

  135. Jo King 说:

    嗨!
    I’m from Portugal. 3 days ago I did share a piece of Ron Unz (China Rises, America declines). Part of it was translated to portuguese and there was a link to the original piece. Yesterday a friend that shared it told me facebook has sent him a notification: the article was considered SPAM and eliminated. My post had also desapeared, they did not even warn me. Só from now on I’ll be sharing articles from UNZ Review translated to portuguese withou the link to the original, my friends will know hou to get here if they wanto to check for themselves.
    Keep up with the good work you’re all doing
    Greatings from Portugal.

    • 回复: @Wizard of Oz
  136. Miro23 说:
    @Anonymous

    It’s like in CASINO the movie. Why doesn’t the casino expose the people who come and go and rob the place? Because those guys are working for the real power behind the operation. The ‘board of directors’ remain clueless. The industry looks the other way while men come to skim money from the place for organized crime.

    I clearly remember that scene. It’s nicely equivalent to day to day functioning of the US government.

  137. Miro23 说:
    @anon

    “ whom Trump, for reasons only he can understand, has appointed to so many top positions in his own administration.”

    Blackmailing of worst nature ? Only his son in law knows .

    Whole teams of journalists were digging for dirt on Trump before and after the election. It’s a stretch to 1) believe that they didn’t find anything 2) they didn’t hand it over to their bosses to use against him.

    So it’s very likely that he’s being blackmailed.

    The MSM is Jewish owned and he happens to be appointing neocons and Zionists everywhere and showing extra special favour to Israel and Wall St.

    Trump isn’t stupid (read his books and look at the organization he built up) but he has been trapped.

  138. anon[361]• 免责声明 说:
    @Donald A Thomson

    Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss, identical twins, are doers, not slackers, who achieved what they have by their effort, not connections (tho to be honest, money enough to send them to top-tier private schools didn’t hurt).

    High school rowers, they competed in the men’s pair rowing event at the 2008 Beijing Olympics

    They’ve apparently used the \$65 million settlement from suing Zuckerberg in their venture capitalism endeavors, including “a seed-funding round for Bitcoin payment processor BitInstant.[2] In April 2013, the brothers said they owned nearly 1 percent of all Bitcoin in existence at that time.[3] They have Bitcoin holdings worth more than \$1 billion.”

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winklevoss_twins

  139. “社交媒体是中央情报局的工具。 认真地”cbsnews.com:
    “你不需要锡纸帽子就相信中央情报局正在使用 Facebook、Twitter、谷歌和其他社交媒体来监视人们。
    这是因为中央情报局通过其技术投资部门 In-Q-Tel 在其赞助的所有社交媒体企业上发布了一份有用的新闻稿清单……自 2004 年以来,谷歌一直是中央情报局的合作伙伴。” 所以,本质上,脸书推特和谷歌不都是政府的分支吗?

  140. “Facebook-CIA 阴谋”nherald.co.nz(8,2007 年 XNUMX 月 XNUMX 日):
    “……这个成功故事的阴暗面在博客圈中蔓延。一个复杂但引人入胜的老大哥式的阴谋论,将 Facebook 与中央情报局和美国国防部联系起来……中央情报局真的提供动力吗?今年最大的 dot com 成功故事背后的资金 [In-Q-Tel]?”

  141. anon[242]• 免责声明 说:
    @SwinolaDiBasso

    it looks like the Deep State did it to wreck Trump’s blue collar prosperity economy.

    Trump did that all himself:

    据称特朗普问福奇官员是否可以让冠状病毒“冲刷”美国

    https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/492390-wapo-trump-allegedly-asked-fauci-if-officials-could-let-coronavirus

    特朗普称冠状病毒民主党是“新骗局”

    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-calls-coronavirus-democrats-new-hoax-n1145721

    … and his “blue collar economy” was almost entirely a sham built from stock buybacks and low wage gig jobs.

  142. anon[391]• 免责声明 说:
    @anonymous

    This banning from Facebook may be just the start of a general move to muzzle differing opinions

    This has been obvious for years but yet lazy “sit back and grill” conservatives did nothing about it. There were lots of solutions but what did they do? Nothing. It’s hard to feel sorry for such a worthless group of people.

  143. anon[285]• 免责声明 说:
    @Wally

    Trump Never Said To Inject Lysol Or Drink Bleach

    Semantics. Trump directly suggest the government explore options to inject people with disinfectant and “bring light into the body.” This is the same kind of false narrative Trump supporters used to defend him from his coronavirus hoax comments: they claimed he never said the virus itself was a hoax; that’s true, few people were suggesting he did; instead, he claimed the virus threat itself was a hoax and compared it to the flu. See how they divert attention to strawmen they create?

    Trump directs experts to see whether they can ‘bring light inside the body’ to kill the coronavirus, even as his own expert shuts him down

    https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-wants-bring-light-inside-the-body-to-kill-coronavirus-2020-4?op=1

    Here’s another example of how his cult followers lie:

    特朗普称冠状病毒民主党是“新骗局”

    NORTH CHARLESTON, S.C. — President Donald Trump accused Democrats of “politicizing” the deadly coronavirus during a campaign rally here on Friday, claiming that the outbreak is “their new hoax” as he continued to downplay the risk in the U.S.

    ...

    Trump again drew a misleading comparison between the coronavirus and the seasonal flu, telling his supporters that “35,000 on average each year die from the flu, that’s a lot of people.”
    “So far we have lost nobody to coronavirus,” Trump said, suggesting the growing global panic was due to the press being in a “hysteria mode.”

    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-calls-coronavirus-democrats-new-hoax-n1145721

    Here’s a so-called debunking typical of the Trump cult crowd:

    “Trump rallies his base to treat coronavirus as a ‘hoax,’” reads the headline. Verdict: False. Trump referred to “politicizing” of the coronavirus by Democrats as “their new hoax.”

    https://www.dailysignal.com/2020/03/02/fact-check-did-trump-call-coronavirus-a-hoax/

    Actual verdict: 真正。 Trump specifically compared the virus threat to the flu and referred to the virus threat itself as a hoax. The “politicizing” angle was not pertinent to this point. When he said “hoax” we wasn’t referring to the “politicizing” bit his cult followers falsely claim he was. That’s a strawman. Trump was downplaying the virus as a nothing哈伯德, which all of us who read and have IQs above 90 now know is false.

    • 回复: @res
    , @Wally
    , @Hippopotamusdrome
  144. @罗恩

    China is under attack by the USA. This is a war of attrition. Hence, all means are available to the assailants like shutting down all dissident voices and analyses.

    There is one way not to be banned by fb: never to subscribe. There is a wonderful life without it. And withour others, too.

    I am sure you keep your way!

  145. Most writings, however interesting, may not or do not truly matter. Being banned from Facebook is, in effect, telling us that the Unz Review matters. Is important enough to be gagged, silenced, censored. Take it as a kind of left-handed compliment.

  146. Wielgus 说:
    @meena

    He is not president. He is an expert on covfefe. And disinfectant. Just like Wally is an expert on the Holocaust.

  147. My comment above was pretty harsh and also wildly off the topic and failed to register that I share distress that Facebook banned Unz forum.
    I’m a major fan of Ron Unz and the outlet for alternative views that he has created and maintains.
    I don’t use Facebook, but I get it that an Unz presence on FB drives traffic to the site, so shutting that down is outrageous. It’s wrong and tyrannical.

    [更多]

    But I am not yet persuaded that the coronavirus is not a media-driven, politically motivated, grossly exaggerated event.

    According to wikipedia this morning, 1.13 cases of coronavirus have been confirmed and 65,605 people have died from coronavirus in the United States between Mar 4 and Apr 28, 2020.

    By comparison, the American Cancer Society projects that in 2020, 1.8 million persons will be diagnosed with cancer, and 606,520 of those persons will die of the disease, a 33.6% death rate.

    Estimated death rates from cancer have decreased over the years, from 35.5% in 2017 to 35% in 2018 t0 34% in 2019.
    It’s worth noting that in July, 2018, less than three years into what was to be a seven-year project, the Biden Cancer Initiative (BCI) — based on the Obama White House’s Cancer Moonshot Initiative — announced that it had suspended its operations indefinitely. https://thehill.com/opinion/healthcare/453593-bidens-cancer-moonshot-another-failed-health-care-initiative

    These projections do not include basal cell and squamous cancers.

    The medical, social and financial burdens of cancer on American society are enormous: one in four deaths in the US are from cancer.

    It’s expensive to treat cancers — even basal and squamous cancers which usually begin with outpatient surgery, ~\$3000; if reconstruction surgery is required, that’s an additional outpatient surgery demanding highly-skilled specialists. A regimen of radiation or chemotherapy may also be required: a typical prescription of radiation therapy calls for 30 to 35 treatments at a cost of approximately \$1200 per treatment.

    The various forms of radiation therapy for cancer use very expensive technologies: a linear accelerator to deliver external radiation can cost \$10 million.

    Many cancer centers have remained active and are treating patients through the coronavirus crisis. However, the technology is only one element of cancer treatment, and it’s the scariest part: cancer treatment centers typically provide extensive support services involving support groups and ancillary specialists to provide advice on nutrition, transportation, side-effects management and the like: these services are severely curtailed by the impact of coronavirus. The machines are humming but the cancer patient is pretty much on his own to navigate the psychological and side-effects of absorbing radiation therapy.

    Whether or not 5g is harmful to humans — that is, whether or to what extent 5g may cause cancer– is beyond my knowledge.

    What I do know is that Pres. Trump “quietly” signed into law two bills “designed to boost broadband and wireless networks:”

    Under the 5G Act, the president must consult with Federal Communications Commission, the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Defense and other agencies and submit to Congress a plan for rolling out secure 5G, both within and outside the US, within 180 days.

    The next generation of wireless technology, 5G brings increased networks speeds and network responsiveness and promises to help bring about real-time mobile applications for technologies like driverless cars and virtual reality. The nation’s biggest wireless companies, AT&T , Sprint , T-Mobile and Verizon , began rolling out 5G service last year.

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/trump-signs-laws-to-boost-5g-security-broadband-availability/ar-BB11EN8z

    • 回复: @Olivier1973
    , @Saggy
  148. @Bert

    But I do know that believing “deep state” American actors were responsible for a release does not meet the criteria of inference that have been routinely used by police detectives for one hundred years.

    For less than one hundred years the impossible happened: China overtook the USA. Then everything becomes possible. Especially with ruthless people. Not afraid to kill their own people like on the 911.

    Listen to Mike “we lied, we cheated, we stole” Pompeo.

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/video/c/mike-pompeo-says-we-lied-we-cheated-we-stole-in-cia/vp-AAEKX5N

    • 回复: @Bert
  149. @Ron Unz

    Look at the timeline:
    – Russiagate : failed;
    – Ukrainegate: failed;
    – Coronagate: last… trump card before November.

    Why? Unemployment is rising high in the USA and there is no social protection. Unescapable. And now Trump plays the “China is guilty” card. When the solution is in his own country.

    the Deep State Neocons whom Trump, for reasons only he can understand, has appointed to so many top positions in his own administration.

    It is called the JFK, MLK, RFK, Seth Rich, etc. syndrom.

  150. 450.org 说:

    After all, many Americans might die if cranks or pranksters began promoting highly dubious cures to the deadly disease, perhaps even suggesting that people should inject themselves with Lysol to ward off an infection.

    It’s amazing, isn’t it? What this orange-faced 首席假阳具 can do? What he can get away with? He’s beyond reproach. Complete impunity and complete immunity. Twitter should have long ago canceled his account if it had any credibility, but Twitter, like Facebook, isn’t about credibility. It’s about information. Feeding the beast with gobs and gobs of information, or more appropriately misinformation and disinformation. Feed it to the AI and let AI churn it and learn from it. And what would it learn from it? That humans are insane and therefore humans’ creation, AI, will also be insane but insane on steroids.

    查看有关的帖子 imgur.com

    He’s crazy. He retweeted this tweet. Look at the name on the account. Trump & Biden Are Rapey. He lives and operates in such an alternate reality, he can’t see or understand the true context, therefore he fails to see that account maligns him every bit as much as it maligns Biden. Or, maybe, and even worse, he realizes the context and doesn’t give a shit because his ultimate goal and his purpose in life is to stir shit. It’s his shitty bread & butter. His forte. The Shit Stirrer in Chief. He’s so many “in Chiefs,” isn’t he? So many hats. So little time. God help us all if there is one.

  151. Miro23 说:
    @Jake

    If this is a US biowarfare gambit gone bad, then your assessment that Trump was left out of the loop is almost certainly true.

    More and more, I think it was the US Deep State playing biowarfare.

    Yes, if it was the US Deep State, then Trump was left out, same as Bush wasn’t in the loop for 9/11.

    The NWO sets the “event” – their MSM spin it – and only then, are Presidents required (channeled) to trigger the desired reaction – although in the case of Bush and 9/11 it could have been even worse.

    Bush was in Florida on the morning of 9/11 and there may have been an attempt to take him out of the picture completely ( leaving Cheney as leader of an emergency neo-con government). The strange affair involved four “Middle Eastern looking” men (supposedly a TV crew) trying to gain access to the President. It was reported in the local newspaper, the Longboat Observer and aired briefly on ABC’s Sarasota affiliate evening newscast, after which it disappeared.

    Source: Daniel Hopsicker’s interesting investigation in Florida, “Welcome to Terrorland”.

  152. KA 说:
    @Anonymous

    Then the justice department will start the process . SPLA will visit the owners and the judges for different but related reasons . Somebody in Congress will ask on Fox or CNN why the allegation against the site by the ADL branch of nameless county of eastern Alabama as reported by local nameless monthly newsletter has not been addressed yet .

    • 回复: @KA
  153. @freedom-cat

    ‘It’ll be bad when WORDPRESS.org starts censoring websites that use it’s platform.

    A lot of Alt media uses wordpress.’

    WordPress already does that. Case in point:

    https://katana17.wordpress.com/2019/03/15/the-great-replacement-manifesto-of-new-zealand-mosque-shooter-mar-2019/

    • 回复: @freedom-cat
  154. res 说:
    @anon

    A good tell for “debunking” pieces like this is when they fail to include any long form quotes in context from Trump backing up what they are claiming.

  155. Katrinka 说:

    Ron, consider it a badge of honor. You don’t need Fakebook, anyway. Everybody needs to stop using it.

  156. @SolontoCroesus

    Whether or not 5g is harmful to humans — that is, whether or to what extent 5g may cause cancer– is beyond my knowledge.

    Very simple: the Chinese 5G is harmful.

    The US 5G is innocuous.

  157. Bumpkin 说:

    As others have said, getting banned by Facebook is a badge of pride, maybe you should state that prominently at the front of the site from now on. Never had a FB account, can’t wait till they go out of business.

  158. Bert 说:
    @Olivier1973

    911 yielded benefits for Israel sufficient to believe that it and/or the U.S. government was involved. That has nothing to do with adducing evidence for a biological attack on China by an unprepared U.S. government. Such an attack would be idiotic.

    As to Pompeo, you seem surprised that the powers that be would be bad actors. I lived in the belly of the beast, so you’re not bringing me any news.

    • 回复: @Olivier1973
  159. kikz 说:

    i think they got VDARE too. i got handslapped for violations of community standards and spam…….. 9 times the other day for posts going back a few days…. eyeroll…

  160. KA 说:
    @KA

    SPLC southern poverty law center

  161. BenKenobi 说:
    @Art

    UR is not screaming “fire” in a crowded theater.

    I can think of two instances in which it is certainly okay to yell “fire!” in a crowded theater:

    1. When it’s in the script.

    2. When the theater is on fire.

  162. @Morton's toes

    “My tracker tracker shows that you are collecting information for facebook right now.”

    Use the Brave browser?

    I have Brave for most things, Firefox when I need some special add-in (like video downloading) or want to look at a long Guardian comment thread (stuff gets repeated using Brave), and on very rare occasions I use Explorer/Edge.

    Brave also has a Tor browser attached, which can sometimes be useful.

    (Colin Wright – WordPress banned Heartiste.)

  163. gregor 说:

    If they aren’t banning you, you’re not even trying.

  164. @aandrews

    There’s supposedly a name you can simply say on YouTube, or publish on Facebook, that’ll get your content instantly banned. Evidently it’s the name of an ex-CIA guy who is the “Ukraine whistleblower”.

    But the supposed name of the whistleblower has been circulating in conservative corners of social media since at least Oct. 3, culminating in Trump Jr.’s Wednesday morning retweet of a Breitbart News article that named an individual. During one 24-hour period last week, the CIA officer’s name was mentioned in more than 150,000 tweets.

    So what’s this supposed name? And so you’re implying that Twitter allows utterance of this holy name but not Youtube and Facebook?

    • 回复: @aandrews
    , @Skeptikal
  165. N30rebel 说:
    @anon

    COVID-45 strikes again.

  166. aandrews 说:
    @David riskanalyst

    “So what’s this supposed name?”

    I don’t know. You’ll have to do some research if you’re dyin’ to know. “Young Jamie” knew. And I’m not implying anything.

  167. @Art

    Facebook is not using America’s founding “community standard” in shutting down UR.

    There must be some way to get that idea into the law.

    Yes. Congress could enact a law declaring the social media companies to be public utilities and direct a federal agency to oversee and protect free speech therein.

    Other than that, executive branch could sue under existing antitrust laws and seek a judicial remedy something like what Judge Harold Green did in dismantling Ma Bell into the Baby Bells and having MCI Worldcom, GTE-Sprint, etc. compete in telecommunications all as a result of that one court case. FDR did that in the 1930s.

  168. Realist 说:
    @Trickster

    Yes, many writers here eliminate comments they don’t like, Mercer Unz, Sailer…Roberts sometime back had a hissy fit and Unz allowed him to eliminate the reply section…it was reinstated and again Roberts wants people with a nom de plume to be banned. I have also noticed that replies to comments are not always emailed to the commenter…even when the box is checked.

    I thought Unz had eliminated my replies, but maybe it is working now.

    • 回复: @trickster
  169. Being banned by FaceBorg is a badge of honour. Having said that I don’t see the logic of “America” unleashing the virus on China – or the reverse for that matter. As a weapon it’s a total loose cannon likely to, as seems to be the case, attack both China and the USA in broadly equal measure.

  170. Bert 说:
    @Bert

    That China covered up the initial spread of SARS-2 is more consistent with a deliberate ChiCom release of the virus than with a U.S. bioattack.

    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/five-eyes-dossier-chinese-coronavirus-coverup-u-s-findings

    • 回复: @foolisholdman
  171. Dutch Boy 说:
    @Mitchell Porter

    关于情报机构在 XNUMX 月警告政府有关新病毒的故事对我来说有一种 CYA 行动的味道。 他们是出了名的无能。

  172. It’s the same situation as with the railroads in the late nineteenth century. The internet companies have got an effective monopoly on an aspect of modern life, and that’s a problem.

    It’s a problem. Mark Zuckerberg may well be a nice guy — it doesn’t matter. The problem’s still there. If some company or group of companies — be they the railroads or be they Facebook et al — gain an effective stranglehold on something central to our existence, it creates a problem.

    • 回复: @Saggy
    , @utu
  173. AaronB 说:

    Since Ron Unz is such a fervent supporter of the Chinese CP, he should be delighted that Chinese-style censorship is beginning to show up in America.

    True, this is but a pale shadow of what China has – merely a private business declining to support this website, and not government crackdown, arrests, and disappearances.

    But it’s a start.

  174. ‘My morning newspapers had recently mentioned Facebook’s plans to crack down on misinformation related to our ongoing Covid-19 epidemic..’

    Does that mean that they’re going to block everything that implies Covid-19 is any more of a problem than, say, flu was in 2017-18, or that implies that the lockdown et al does any good at all when the counter-examples of Sweden and South Korea suggest that we’re accomplishing nothing at all thereby except engineering a global depression?

    All that crap will get blocked now? Demands to keep parks and schools closed? To force restaurants to stay closed? We’ll see an end to all that looniness?

  175. JimB 说:

    所有人都知道,美国的统治精英是犯罪分子,疯狂分子,而且也极为无能。

    Agreed. If Facebook management were thinking straight, they would support Ron’s anti-US coronavirus narrative floating around on social media. It diverts attention from the emerging evidence which seems consistent with a reckless Chinese researcher accidently unleashing it on China, then China deciding to spread it to the world by letting its citizens out of the Hubei Province quarantine to travel internationally.

    The PPC reminds me of the woman arrested in Wuhan who, after catching the illness, licked her neighbors’ doorknobs.

    • 回复: @Anon
  176. JimB 说:

    By proxy, all Unz Review commenters have been banned from Facebook. Whoo-hoo! And I don’t even have a FB account.

  177. @Bert

    Such an attack would be idiotic.

    Not at all. 911 was already idiotic. So many things the USA do are idiotic. It would be very surprising if the USA will do something not idiotic. The aim and hope were to bring down the Chinese economy like it was already done with the swine flu and the avian flu. Only the Chinese readiness to fight successfully this human disease did not bring the expected result. And now it is backfiring. But it allows now to indict China as the culprit and with the hope to steal what could be stolen. Same plan as with North Korea. And wait for the Chinese reaction if that should happen. So yes the plan is idiotic, but not for twisted minds.

  178. Saggy 说: • 您的网站
    @SolontoCroesus

    But I am not yet persuaded that the coronavirus is not a media-driven, politically motivated, grossly exaggerated event.

    Every country in the world is being stood on its head, and you and Trump think it’s a hoax ???

    For Christ’s sake, look at what the medical community is saying. There are countless vids, my goto guys are Peak Prosperity and MedCram on Youtube.

    (Skip the 1st 3 min)

    • 回复: @SolontoCroesus
  179. Saggy 说: • 您的网站
    @Colin Wright

    The problem’s still there. If some company or group of companies — be they the railroads or be they Facebook et al — gain an effective stranglehold on something central to our existence, it creates a problem

    .

    ??? The Jews have had a stranglehold on our media for 100+ years …. and look at the result … we’re living it ….. a freaking nightmare – total thermonuclear destruction – waiting to happen …. and no one notices.

    一开始:

    [更多]

    最重要的是,这个声称自己是自由的国家并掌握了自己的命运的国家被洗脑了。 1914年,任何美国人都会嘲笑这种观点,即三年后他会因为与自己国家无关的事务而在法国苦苦挣扎。

    “然而,当1917年到来时,同一个人热情地应征入伍。 我们碰巧面试并询问自己的战斗动机的每一个士兵总是回答:“我们为民主而战”。 他们比其他国家的士兵领先一步,他们为自己的祖国而战。

    ``只有当我们意识到法国受到马萨诸塞州,宾夕法尼亚州,佛罗里达州,伊利诺伊州,怀俄明州,加利福尼亚州,路易斯安那州以及随后的安大略省,曼尼托巴省,罗得西亚州和新南威尔士州的数十万居民的入侵时,他们的唯一动机是为了加快民主的胜利,我们开始了解以色列的力量。 鼓动整个国家由坚硬,自负和功利主义者组成的民族,并说服他们,他们最大的特权是在地球的尽头出发并被杀,没有希望自己或自己的子孙受益的力量。几乎没有他们与之抗争或为之奋斗的原因,或者为什么,这是一种简直令人难以置信的现象,使人们在想到它时就感到害怕。”

    摘自E. Malynski的《 LaDémocratieVictorieuse》,1929年

  180. Wally 说:
    @anon

    – Dear anon Pelosi:
    You cite information which debunks your absurd points, but then scramble to make up TDS excuses why it does. LOL

    事实:
    An examination of the video and transcript show Trump actually described Democratic complaints about his handling of the virus threat as “their new hoax.”:
    https://checkyourfact.com/2020/02/29/fact-check-donald-trump-coronavirus-hoax-south-carolina-rally/
    – Medical professionals have clearly stated that sunlight / light helps fight CV19. Please pay attention.
    – Imagine a Joe Biden press conference:
    Hello, I’m Joe Biden, I’m running for the US Senate & will be nodding out any second. And what the hell is a virus anyway?“。更多信息:
    特朗普再次是对的,媒体是错的: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/03/once_again_trump_was_right_and_the_media_were_wrong.html
    Donald Trump Goes to War: Shows Media Video of Their Reporting Failures on Coronavirus: https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/04/13/donald-trump-goes-to-war-shows-media-a-video-of-their-reporting-failures-on-coronavirus/
    Democrats Who Blame Trump Sang a Different Song a Month ago: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/03/dear_democrats_who_blame_trump_you_sang_a_different_song_a_month_ago.html

    特朗普在2020年发生滑坡。

    • 回复: @Peripatetic Commenter
  181. mcohen 说:

    Banned by Facebook.Wow.What a honour,give Ron a medal.Stand up to the tyrants and post more articles.
    Be the last man standing,Ron,or die trying.

  182. Iva 说:

    The US used to criticize China for censorship, and now US allow FB, YT etc to censor independent news. Where is Trump’s “executive” order that he was so eager to sign in beginning of his presidency???? We need executive order “NO CENSORSIP”, FREE SPEECH….. Lets people write and say what they want , and people made their own decision whom they want to listen. However, with article in The Atlantic saying that the “China was largely right and the US was largely wrong about censorship and freedom”, I think Chinese system is already here. 

    • 同意: Colin Wright
  183. @Jo King

    You might usefully trying to give disguised links such as unzd0tcom and tell us how it goes.

  184. Slimer 说:

    It’s cause you look like a Duck

    [更多]

  185. utu 说:
    @Colin Wright

    This is not about monopolies. State run monopolies in some sectors of economy are always better. If the FB was state run or state regulated utility they could not hide behind the usual copout of being private and thus being allowed to do more, like do more in censoring and refusing access. The government can’t hold them responsible for it because they are private and as private entities they have rights. For this very reason the US powers that be prefer private media than state media that under the law could be and would be publicly scrutinized and controlled. Americans can’t climb out of the semantic trap created by years of conditioning and propaganda that the private is always better than public and that corporations acquired a personhood and thus are entitled to rights like any citizen. This semantic trap limits the full discourse limiting the debate to competition(private) vs monopoly (private) only.

    • 同意: mark green
    • 回复: @Colin Wright
  186. @utu

    I think we’re agreeing. My point is actually that the federal government 做了 start regulating railroads — setting tariffs, etc.

    Something equivalent is not necessarily the only or even the best solution to the problem of Facebook et al, but step one is realizing that there’s a problem.

  187. FB is not a government site, it is a private enterprise and as such has the right to decide on its content, just as you do Ron. Someone can come a long and start a rival to FB that allows different content. So I do not see it so much as censorship.
    Censors are very touchy about conspiracy theories with regards to Covid as it is currently a very confusing situation with the locks down, loss of work and a wrecked economy. The internet did not turn out so well as many unstable people get more deranged by misinformation or conspiracies. It lets loose a lot of craziness. So with people out of work and pent up it is bad to serve up any information that might incite violence.

    I have personally noticed a severe dissent by PG from substantial anti Zionist articles into just plain Jew bashing to the point where he has presented false information, and his FB commentators reflect the slide with cartoonish Jew tropes etc. I think PG will be kicked off FB any moment irrespective of UR. Touchy times.

    • 回复: @anon
    , @Commentator Mike
  188. Dan Hayes 说:

    In the grand scheme of things, being kicked off FB should not prove of much consequence to PG (Paul Giraldi to the uninitiated) compared to losing his senior position at the squeamish “American Conservative”.

  189. Richard B 说:
    @Graham Seibert

    所有人都知道,美国的统治精英是犯罪分子,疯狂分子,而且也极为无能。

    Which would explain their relationship with The Chinese Communsit Party.

    考虑到这一点

    So perhaps the coronavirus outbreak was indeed a deliberate biowarfare attack against China

    should read: “…the outbreak was a joint-venture hate hoax orchestrated by The CCP and our hostile elite to destroy the USA and make China look good.

    However, the PRC responded with remarkable speed and efficiency

    Did the guy they hired to organize this pandemic use to direct Vanilla Ice videos?

    Cause that’s the last time I saw choreography that predictable and stiff.

    Or, as long as we’re on the subject of bad choreography, maybe he was influenced by the people who brought us the Lee Harvey Oswald assassination.

    Meanwhile, the disease naturally leaks back into the US, and despite all the advance warning, our totally incompetent government mismanages the situation

    Tragedies that follow “advance warning” is a tradition among the hostile elite that goes back to Peal Harbor and includes September 11th, 2001.

    producing a huge national health disaster, and the collapse of our economy and decrepit political system.

    In other words, the deliberate collapse of a country they openly despise and long to destroy by, in part, replacing the host population with other people and robots.

    And then along comes a populust uprising and ooops, they need a plan!

    进行《 Unz评论》时,谁需要阴谋论?

    The answer, obviously, is that you don’t.

    Maybe the possibility that the hostile elite have started to ask themselves this same question and have answered it in the same way is the real reason behind TUR getting removed from facebook.

  190. @Timur The Lame

    Thanks. I have never before heard that quote from Edison but it is great!

  191. old smokey 说:
    @Bill Jones

    打败我吧😉

    还有……墨西哥湾流(由中央情报局租用)在墨西哥坠毁,船上有 4 吨焦炭。

    这里没什么好报道的……

  192. Anon[119]• 免责声明 说:

    If you aren’t taking flack, then you aren’t over the target.

    I agree that China did not mastermind this but Ron is still fearmongering, coronavirus is adjacent to a hoax.

    https://www.aier.org/article/an-egregious-statistical-horror-story-suffused-with-incense-and-lugubrious-accents/

    https://wallstreetonparade.com/2020/05/wall-streets-financial-crisis-preceded-covid-19-chart-and-timeline/

  193. Anon[119]• 免责声明 说:
    @JimB

    You realize the US has 3800+ areas with water twice as bad as Flint Michigan, yet nobody talks about it.
    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-lead-map-idUSKBN1DE1H2

    China has bullet trains.

    The average Chinese citizen has seen their economic situation improve for twenty years.

    The US currently has inequality that has never been matched in world history.

    Have you read Ron’s article about the fact that Vioxx probably killed approximately 500,000 people and nobody was arrested. China jailed and hung people after the melamine scandal where 6 total people died.

    Approximately 80% of US weapons require at least one Chinese input

    China pours more concrete every two years, than the US poured during the entire 20th century.

  194. anon[289]• 免责声明 说:
    @Fran Taubman

    FB 不是政府网站,它是一家私营企业,因此有权决定其内容,就像您做 Ron 一样。

    Graceful loser syndrome. As the poster above said, it’s a “semantic trap”. That’s why the American right loses all the time. They’ve been conditioned by the corporate media to repeat useless jargon on behalf of companies who discriminate against them while their enemy observes no such limitation for themselves. It’s ultimately self-defeating. It assures that you lose 100% of the time, which is why they promote that stuff.

    AT&T was also a private telecommunications company. We regulated that monopoly so that they couldn’t simply deny service to people at a whim. Same here. Facebook is a monopoly. Regulate them or break them up so others can compete with them, but don’t defend them. You do so at your own peril. There is no honor in gracefully losing, which is the hallmark of the American right these days. American conservativism’s purpose is to conserve and to justify the continual gains of the left — yesterday’s liberal is today’s conservative.

    有人可能会很长一段时间,并开始与允许不同内容的 FB 竞争。 所以我不认为它是审查制度。

    No, they can’t. That requires an extraordinary capital investment at this point. You’re absolutely not going to get that kind of money if you’re accused of allowing hatespeech on your platform — another form of tacit government control. And that “hatespeech” definition is a moving target. There is a reason why Unz was founded by a single wealthy man with means. Try to get money from Goldman Sachs these days and you’ll run up against their policy requiring a woman on your board; in the future, X number of other groups. Try to build 任何 排除唤醒联盟和资金的任何部分的平台将被拒绝,因为他们控制资金。 或者他们可能使用他们的媒体来骚扰和骚扰你。 或者,也许 FBI 会出现在评论中,发布一些可怕的东西(就像他们对 4chan 所做的那样),并以此作为法庭文件中的理由来关闭您的网站。

    Further, others have indeed tried to build alternatives only to find other corporations, including the media, have colluded against them — Gab, for instance. There are many other examples -> comics, videogames, etc. There. Is. No. Honor. In. Gracefully. Losing.

    • 回复: @9/11 Inside job
  195. Anon[119]• 免责声明 说:
    @Michael888

    Don’t forget Trumans regret of establishing the CIA
    Eisenhower’s quote of leaving a “legacy of ashes”
    The CIAs ties to Watergate
    JFK firing Dulles, wanting to shatter the CIA into a million pieces and scattering them to the wind, Lee Harvey Oswald telling hoover about the CIA training anticastro guerrillas at lake pontchartrain , so that jfk could attempt to shut it down in order to keep his promise to kruchev about promising not to invade Cuba, in exchange for kruchev removing the missiles, and then Dulles presiding over the Warren commission.
    Jimmy Carter’s chance at a second term being ruined by the fact that he couldn’t get the Iran hostages released,because the Safari club led by George bush had bribed the iranians with the promise of weapons sales in exchange for not releasing the hostages until after Reagan was elected, the reason was that Carter had fired 40% of the CIA and told the rest to stick to their mandate, to not kill anybody, and not do anything in America.
    Reagan’s assassin, Hinckley’s family was extremely close to the Bush family and Hinckley’s father was facing an audit, which mysteriously went away after the assassination attempt, ntm Nancy Reagan never spoke to the Bushes after, and afterwards George bush was given almost sole control of US foreign policy.

  196. dna 说:

    Have immediately posted your articles by adding a space before and after the “dot”, removing the “https://www.” So far they are posting without the community getting up in arms.

  197. UmHello 说:

    UNZ, I don’t think it was any particular thing you wrote recently. There was just a big elimination of right-wing Facebook pages, including “White Girl Bleed A Lot”, which carries a lot of your articles. And while I do not agree with most of what you say, I will defend to the death your right to say it.

    • 回复: @Richard B
  198. @Si1ver1ock

    1. The US Gov has admitted that the UFO footage shot by US fighter pilots is real.

    Then it must be true.

    • 哈哈: Iris
  199. Perhaps Ron could work out an 可接受 sharing or publishing arrangement with RT or China Today and replace the loss of Facebook’s large audience with a huge Eurasian audience.

    • 回复: @A-R
  200. Anonymous[208]• 免责声明 说:

    Your site is banned because of the “antisemitic” facts you have posted. The reason they didn’t do it sooner is they didn’t notice you, you simply weren’t big enough. Despite the modest growth, you’re still a small, obscure site. It takes a bunch of JIDF reports before a page gets sent to the ADL censors. You can tell the reason because they banned you for “violating community standards”, that means posting hate facts that jews don’t like. If they banned you over any of the stupid chinkypox nonsense posted here, it would have said you were banned for “fake news”.

    • 同意: Colin Wright
  201. A-R 说:

    最近的文章并没有比其他早期的文章带来更多的启发性信息。 被禁的原因是他们,恶魔的掌权精英(如果你最近才睁开眼睛,我建议调查pizzagate、儿童祭祀、罗纳德·伯纳德、发现者等)现在正在杀戮。 他们烤面包的时间已经足够长了,在他们看来,是时候完成他们计划的膳食并完成交易了。 国际上出现了压制自由的高潮,高校正在大规模生产至少有共产主义倾向的输出,以自由的名义教授堕落,人口的团结被大大削弱,大豆男孩和大豆男性,男性女性,女权主义者和家庭同性恋联盟通过破坏其单位结构家庭,极大地帮助了社会的破坏。 在最基本的层面上,家庭受到了攻击,而在相对较高的层面上,社会受到了精心设计的大规模移民的攻击。 所有这些表面上相互关联的事件实际上都是依次并行制造的。 然后是冠状病毒,几乎完全封锁了整个星球,人们自己要求更多的监狱和更好的锁链。 Unz 和 David Icke 到处同时被禁。 罗恩并不意外,但在意料之中。 做好准备,我的人类朋友,因为很快他们就会把刀叉拔出来。 那我们要做什么呢?

    • 回复: @old smokey
  202. A-R 说:
    @Buzz Baldrin

    RT is becoming more and more truth twisting by the day. Many times seems just another zio-demon-oulet. They would never republish many unz.com articles, thus you must be a troll.

  203. The CIA is in overdrive with their ‘China Virus’ and does not want anyone connecting the dots that lead directly to Fort Detrick or Dual Use Gain of Function bioweapons research. They also don’t want people to know that the US Government is funding the deadly pathogen research worldwide.

    I’ve never bothered with Facebook given that it is controlled by USA Intel mindlessness, corruption, & criminality.

    Getting deplatformed by the Zuckmeister is a feather in your cap, Professor Unz.

    RW

    • 同意: Iris
  204. trickster 说:
    @Realist

    That’s right, Roberts is notorious for cutting comments when he is challenged. He and Karlin are battling for the “We will tolerate no disagreement from readers” trophy. Roberts made an unacceptable comment to some readers about them not having the balls to use their own names when commenting and hiding behind their handles. I pointed out that this was an easy fix. All he had to do was insist the blog sites he serves require readers to submit 3 pieces of ID one of which should have a photo and be preapproved to comment. This solves his beef. However I pointed out to him HE would be out of a job. The fact is that he can also use a handle. There are many authors who use a different name and of course Hollywood is rife with the practice. Roberts also suggested/ insisted we listen to the “experts” but again I asked who were these experts ? They all disagree with each other. Does he mean HE is the expert and we should listen to him like obedient poodles because he is that self proclaimed hero ? I tried to get my comment posted 3 times but with moderation it disappeared.

    Realist, if a writer does not want to defend their work then they should find another profession. There are lots of jobs available but they will find to their dismay that whatever work they do there is always someone who will criticise and hoist a person on their petard. How a fellow handles this differentiates the men from the boys masquerading as men….and as writers.

    • 同意: Realist
    • 不同意: Mr. Hack, GazaPlanet
    • 回复: @Realist
    , @Mr. Hack
    , @trickster
  205. Desiderius 说:

    suggesting that people should inject themselves with Lysol to ward off an infection

    Enjoy hanging separately, fool.

  206. old smokey 说:

    Anyhoo……操脸书……用屁股的下颚骨操它。

    如果来自我尚未订阅的来源,我现在会报告出现在我的提要上的每一个帖子。

    来自政府的广告?……假新闻。

    迪斯尼?……不恰当的色情内容。

    CNN … 垃圾邮件

    没有一个漏掉。

    我也鼓励你们和他们一起玩。

    〜os。

    • 哈哈: Iris, trickster
  207. old smokey 说:
    @A-R

    是的,嗯……我不会为大卫·艾克掉一滴眼泪。

    与亚历克斯·琼斯 (Alex Jones) 相同的布防信息代理...

    顺便说一句,大袋粪便的集体名词是什么?

  208. trickster 说:
    @Skeptikal

    I have never used Facebook and never will. If I need to let anyone know anything there is the phone. In any case the only people I have any need to talk to are the ones I care about provided I feel they care about me. If I am the one giving all the love and they are the one taking all the love, regardless of the relationship the Trickster severs the tie completely and moves on. Hence I am always stunned that people reveal the most intimate details of their life to people they dont even know AND get upset when they are “unfriended”. Back in the day if you asked a woman “who are you fucking these days” you would be told it was none of your business. Now, they post their trysts right on FB with photos and all. I remember years ago reading about a woman who liked the black boys and would head down to the islands for the BBC.The idiot posted all the details and of course the comments from her girlfriends floated back and forth. The fun came to an end when her employer got a hold of the posts and terminated her from the 6 figure job she held. We seem to be living in mad times and so many people have a sick obsession to display their life for the world to see on a minute by minute basis, everything from the breakfast they had at Denny;s to the dump they just took. If everyone stopped using the medium the Zuker man would be left holding the bag but he knows only too well human nature craves approval. It is also unbelievable that criminals are also posting on social media. Bubba was broke and hand to mouth yesterday morning, there was a big stickup at noon and at 6 pm he posts fotos of himself driving a new Hummer and wearing designer threads. DUH ! I stick to the philosophy that privacy and silence are the best policies. The least people know about you the better. What was that old English proverb ? Least said soonest mended. In this weird world in which we now exist the Trickster has a new proverb “Zero posted = zero problems”

  209. @anon

    Facebook 是一个准政府网站,它由 CIA 的投资部门 In-Q-Tel 资助,(请参阅我上面的评论 #144 和 #145)在我看来,Facebook 的任何审查都是国家审查,并且违反第一修正案。

  210. It is difficult to imagine a greater honor than to be banned by Facebook.

    Such an honor does indeed signify that this site and at least some of the writers here, most likely RU, are getting a little too close to the truth.

    The only greater recognition for this site would be if the beautiful Heidi Beirich from the SPLC or Abe Foxman from the ADL denounces you on CNN, MSNBC, and Fox News on the same evening!

    Even Hannity might join up with Fredo Cuomo for the denouncement!

    You are now officially a witch deserving of the stake.

    • 回复: @but an humble craftsman
  211. @AaronB

    Best site out there for challenging the narrative in a detailed, comprehensive manner.

    对于那个很抱歉!

  212. Realist 说:
    @trickster

    This morning after two posts I was told that I was posting too much. It appears the asskicking Unz received from Facebook has taken it toll.

    This also happened yesterday morning.

    • 回复: @RodW
  213. Emma 说:

    It is unsettling that most of the articles, videos and speakers related to ” COVID 19″ are banned and taken down from Facebook and YouTube after receiving many views just so happened that they are giving different views from the official narrative.

    Recently some medical doctors came out and exposed their fraudulent stories what is going on with corona crisis based on their experiences, the next day their videos are gone missing when searched to share second time. It is as though they have monopoly on what news and information should be spread should make everyone wonder what are they afraid of alternative news and views. Most importantly why are they trying to hide public from knowing the truth.

    Normal human mind is capable of making decisions on its own if it does not have cognitive dissonance. But when people are given one sided, censored and baseless information just to distort the reality and inject fear then we know that there is certainly some sinister plan is underway and they are pushing harder and harder to their last breath. However, if not later sooner truth will come to surface and prevail if humanity still put high value on the truth and integrity.

  214. Mr. Hack 说:
    @trickster

    I don’t know about Roberts, but Karlin has always practiced a policy of free speech over at his blog. He and I sometimes disagree on fundamental issues, but he has never deleted any of my comments, and often will reply back. He draws the line whenever somebody tries to dox somebody else, or gets involved in what he calls “srach” behavior (endless haranguing of one another often employing foul language).

  215. sarz 说:
    @jsinton

    “Tyler Durden” (Daniel Ivandjiiski) seems to be some sort of pro-Trump intelligence operative. His website ZeroHedge was kicked off Twitter for doxxing the msin Wuhan scientist and inviting people to harass him, making it more difficult for him to do his job in the emergency. The banning is not unreasonable.

    Ivandjiiski’s great eagerness to blame China for the pandemic suggests that Trump is indeed involved.

    Trump and the globalists, and hence the entire CIA, not just a fragment of it loyal to Trump, are now on the same page vis-a-vis China. The globalists have found the Chinese communists to be too incorruptible for their needs. The globalist Atlantic magazine has an article “Consider the Possibility That Trump Is Right On China …” and the National Review “Maybe Trump Is Right about China”.

    The Big-Jews of which Trump is one are no longer so seriously divided, and they just sat down to carve out shares of the biggest theft in history.

  216. Derer 说:
    @Bert

    “…in light of the Facebook censorship,…You may have laid one too many straws on to the camel.”

    Nonsense! How can a little nerdy spy from the Facebook be a straw for The Unz. He is damaged goods, a convicted spy selling personal info.

  217. @AaronB

    All the racism and Jew hatred was so obviously over the top and deranged

    It’s very good to know that you are deeply concerned about racism and Jew hatred, friend.

    Try to be a little more concerned about the true racists and haters:

    “The White race is the cancer of the earth. Sooner or later it simply has to go” – Barbara Lerner Spectre, lying, thieving anti-White racist Jew “sociologist” who runs an anti-White racist Jewish affairs institute in White-majority Sweden – entirely at White-majority Swedish tax-payers’ expense.

  218. Ozymandias 说:
    @Erebus

    You linked to a Bing search page.

    Yes, I know that. I am, after all, the one who posted it. The reason I linked to a search result instead of a single site was so that you would have many results to choose from and not try the old “not a credible source” dodge.

    One hopes you can come up with a specific link to a credible source.

    And there it is, in spite of my efforts.

    all these American media sources agree that Chinese officials first became aware of the serious viral outbreak in Wuhan in early to mid-January

    China released the genetic sequence of the novel coronavirus on January 11, while possibly not even being aware of it yet. Now that is impressive work. No wonder you boys are so enamored with them.
    Along with the genetic sequence of the virus they weren’t aware of yet, China’s good friend, the World Health Organization, assured everyone that the virus could not be spread by human contact, and called for no restriction on international air travel:
    https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2020/01/china-releases-genetic-data-new-coronavirus-now-deadly

    WHO advises against the application of any travel or trade restrictions on China based on the information currently available on this event.

    From W.H.O.’s own website. Now that’s what you would call not a credible source.
    https://www.who.int/news-room/articles-detail/who-advice-for-international-travel-and-trade-in-relation-to-the-outbreak-of-pneumonia-caused-by-a-new-coronavirus-in-china/

    • 回复: @Ozymandias
    , @Erebus
  219. @Ron Unz

    Deep State Neocons whom Trump, for reasons only he can understand, has appointed to so many top positions in his own administration

    UMmm… No. I don’t really believe now that Trump has any idea at all why he was told to appoint those men to those positions.

    That’s because we seem to be living in a kind of deranged, topsy-turvy, nightmarish world of creeping asylum-level insanity, where a man who has apparently spent his entire business life in New York, the “hardest” city on earth, doing high-level property / estate business deals with overwhelmingly Jewish billionaires, moguls, conmen, liars, thieves, and old-school hard-hitters and cutthroats appears in his 70’s to have no understanding whatever of how Jews as a group operate – or what their unchanging, paranoid, psycopathic priorities really are.

    After all this peace and ecstacy since 2016, How in the name of Odin can he really NOT know…?

    Answers on a postcard, please…

  220. Ozymandias 说:
    @Ozymandias

    Hey, here’s a fun little comment:

    If china and the Dems can’t crash the economy, Trump will be reelected.

    From December 27th. https://www.unz.com/pbuchanan/is-little-rocket-man-winning/#comment-3629310

  221. @JackOH

    Run a full-page open letter in Bay Area newspapers addressed to Facebook/Zuckerberg

    Brilliant – by which I mean, I absolutely agree.

    A little bit of money to run the full-pager, backed up with (non-public) cast-iron legal advice, and that thieving, spineless moon-faced creep Zuckerberg wouldn’t know which way to turn to assure the world’s media that he really ISN’T a lying, scheming, free-speech-limiting, new-world-order lackey n-a z-i scumbag. Meanwhile Ron will be all over the NYT, probably Time Magazine, and the breakfast tv shows (if he wants) – or keep a VERY low and silent, hard-line profile refusing all requests if he doesn’t.

    What downside ? Poor little out-manoeuvred cry-baby Zucker doesn’t like him anymore ? Wow. That might break somebody’s heart.

    • 回复: @JackOH
  222. @anon

    Trump directly suggest the government explore options to inject people with disinfectant and “bring light into the body.”

    This what he was talking about?

    YouTube and Twitter Censor Pharma Company Researching UV Light Treatment for Chinese Virus
    Twitter and YouTube have censored AYTU BioScience, a publicly-traded Colorado-based pharmaceutical company, after it promoted ultraviolet (UV) light developed in conjunction with Cedars-Sinai Medical Center as a potential treatment for the Chinese virus. Twitter later reversed its censorship, saying the company’s account was “mistakenly” caught in a spam filter.


    Now Twitter CENSORS Bio-Tech Conmpany’s UV Light Treatment Research After Trump Touted It
    YouTube banned the company’s video last week

    Following in lockstep with YouTube, Twitter suspended the account of a Colorado biotech company which is working to develop a potential coronavirus treatment using UV light inserted into the lungs. It appears that both social media sites have censored the legitimate research purely because President Trump mentioned it.

    • 回复: @Peripatetic Commenter
  223. @Bert

    As I said in a comment on an earlier article, the balance of probabilities seems to me to lie in the 偶然 taking of the covid-19 virus to Wuhan by the US team to the World Military Games. The virus probably escaped from Fort Detrick (something did) and the team practiced for the games nearby. This scenario accounts for/explains almost everything that I have read about this event, except the abysmal performance of the US team. (I suppose it is just possible that most of them were suffering from covid-19 though not very probable.) However, even that sort of score, seems to be traditional, so perhaps it does not need to be accounted for?

    • 回复: @Ron Unz
  224. nsa 说:

    The Unz Review is a privately held entity. As such, the owner can publish whatever he wants, and ban anyone he dislikes or disagrees with . Likewise, CuntBook is a privately held entity. As such, the owners can publish whatever they want, and ban anyone they dislike or disagree with. Have read that CuntBook has 1.69 billion users worldwide which indicates there is little hope for the human race……..

  225. JackOH 说:
    @Dave Bowman

    DB, thanks.

    The down side is real, but Ron has to make the call. You’re right–Facebook won’t respond to a public letter from Ron for fear of elevating him to good national prominence. But, a big wealthy outfit like Facebook can probably find enough creeps for hire to make Ron’s life uncomfortable. Ron’s call.

  226. DaveE 说:
    @animalogic

    That it’s total bullshit IS the point: the more grotesque the lies the more they must be unconditionally defended.

    Intelligence agencies – professional liars – face two conflicting challenges:

    1.) maintaining the appearance of credibility and
    2.) lying

    These two goals are in a constant tug-of-war, but they’re both “managed” by the same crowd. They’ve learned to spill some truth truth occasionally to keep people listening, while simultaneously accepting that being called liars can also work to their advantage – by increasing their credibility with people who know they’re being lied to.

    We all know we’re being had – even people who live on Facebook – we just don’t always know how.

    But we DO KNOW who’s doing the lying, and why.

  227. Anonymous[932]• 免责声明 说:

    Best to take that as a badge of honor. I tried to post some Unz Review articles the other day and got the typical “community standards” knee jerk response from Comrade Gletkin.

  228. JamesinNM 说:
    @Bert

    How many atrocities must the U.S. Federal Government and its co-conspirators perpetrate in the U.S. and worldwide before U.S. responsibility for the next atrocity is considered plausible?

  229. Ron Unz 说:
    @foolisholdman

    As I said in a comment on an earlier article, the balance of probabilities seems to me to lie in the accidental taking of the covid-19 virus to Wuhan by the US team to the World Military Games. The virus probably escaped from Fort Detrick (something did) and the team practiced for the games nearby. This scenario accounts for/explains almost everything that I have read about this event…

    I realize that’s the theory promoted by Chinese propaganda, but I just can’t see how it makes any logical sense at all…

    Under normal conditions, Covid-19 is an *极其* infectious virus. For example, it appears that just a tiny handful of infected individuals in the US during early January had produced an epidemic of over a million infections within a couple of months.

    You seem to believe that the infections were already present in the US during October 2019 in sufficient numbers that they “just happened” to include a few Americans who went to Wuhan in the military games at that time. But if so, then probably a million or more Americans would have already been infected by the end of the year, and the resulting tens of thousands of American deaths would have been very noticeable by late December. By January, probably hundreds of thousands of Americans would have died.

    How do you avoid those logical contradictions?

  230. @Bert

    Sure! Fox news is a good, reliable, objective source to quote. As usual, the speaker said that the Chinese shut down their internal aviation “But continued to allow international flights out from Wuhan”, which is true in terms of bare facts, but leave out of account that these “international flights” were planes sent by various governments to evacuate their nationals from the dangerous situation in China. What were the Chinese authorities supposed to do? Tell them to piss off? “You can’t have them”? Can you imagine the reaction that would have caused in the West?

    • 回复: @Seraphim
  231. @Ron Unz

    I hope I shall not be told that I am posting too many comments. I have only a limited time to reply. The US team may have not been infected immediately after the BL4 lab in Fort Detrick was closed down. Often when a virus infects a new host it takes time to adapt and it may be that it spread more slowly at first than later also if only one person was infected by a leak from the FD lab and infected only three or so others with a not unusual gestation period there would have been only a few people infected by the time the US team was practicing in the vicinity of the leaky lab. That ere may have been many more people infected than the official figures show does seem to be the case now. Apart from that there seem to have been infections in Europe, Taiwan and Japan rather earlier than it is easy to account for by infections from Chaina and they are, in any case, not the same strain. There are many, admittedly anecdotal, accounts of people who believe (in both Europe and the US) that they were infected with the covid-19 in the later months of last year.

  232. Seraphim 说:
    @foolisholdman

    Children and Fools have many times more common sense than the adults and the ‘wise’. They see and tell people that the King is naked!

  233. @Colin Wright

    是的。 WordPress.com is doing that. But wordpress.com sites are simple but you have no power over your code.

    But I’m talking about WordPress.org, where people actually have access to the code and build their sites using that code (which they can manipulate unlike the wordpress.com 种类)。

    Unz uses wordpress and so do many alternative media sites.

    • 谢谢: Colin Wright
  234. @AaronB

    ‘But I guess now in a time of plague, whipping up peoples emotions and trying to create hate and anger and negativity can’t be so easily ignored – or so they think.’

    But…but Aaron, you haven’t been banned. How do you explain that?

    • 哈哈: AnonStarter
  235. Unz wasn’t already banned? I’m genuinely surprised to hear that.

  236. Erebus 说:
    @Ozymandias

    To help you out a little, there’s a small difference between…

    在十二月, Taiwan notified the World Health Organization that there was a severe viral outbreak in China.

    和…

    … all these American media sources agree that Chinese officials first became aware of the serious viral outbreak in Wuhan in early to 一月中旬。

    Did you notice it? That’s a lot more obvious than the other difference you also failed to spot.

    • 回复: @Ozymandias
  237. I have been banned from a lot of places by linking the unz review. I even have a stalker anon named achmed who follows me around on Reddit reporting my comments. This anon is also here. Lol.

  238. Ozymandias 说:
    @Erebus

    Good Lord, you are a stooge. China knew their virus had escaped in November. They lied. It’s what they do. By December other countries were reporting about the outbreak 在中国. By January, China knew the jig was up and they had to admit it. This little game of “whoever notices the problem first must have caused it” is exactly the type of idiocy that allows China to keep on lying.

    • 回复: @Erebus
  239. Erebus 说:
    @Ozymandias

    Lookit, you said:

    In December, Taiwan notified the World Health Organization that there was a severe viral outbreak in China. W.H.O. ignored it of course…

    I asked if you had a source. As you’d actually sucked that out of your thumb, you had nothing so you threw up a fog hoping to obfuscate the issue.

    Having been called on that too, you’re now flinging faeces. Ya got nuthin Ozzy. Give it up man.
    Piss off to ZH. You could be a hero, just for one day.

    • 回复: @Ozymandias
  240. Bill Jones 说:
    @Trickster

    “Either you can say what you want or not but you cannot have it both ways”

    Well actually you can. Unz promotes free speech by providing a platform to voices that would otherwise likely be censored. Some of those voices promote free speech, others don’t.

    这有什么问题?

    Or would you have Unz censor those who don’t promote free speech?

    • 回复: @trickster
  241. Art 说:
    @Art

    Zuckerberg the book burner!

    How is it that FB and Zuckerberg can cut off 1,500,000,000 people, from access to a massive online library of books and articles – all because of one article that he does not like. That is in no way – right.

    What Zuckerberg is doing – is modern day “book burning.” UR is more than an article or two. UR has a very important massive library of unpublished books and articles – that are available to all – free.

    Zuckerberg hides behind the term “community standards.” How many of those 1,500,000,000 people did he ask before he cut off access? Was the “community” ever asked?

    Hmm? Zuckerberg should have to prove his words “community standards.”

    Words matter. The Jew book burner – Mark Zuckerberg is vulnerable.

    • 同意: Commentator Mike
    • 回复: @trickster
  242. The Unz Review should take their banning by Facebook as an honor.

    Besides most of the people who take Facebook seriously are really not intelligent enough to appreciate the articles that appear on this site…

    • 同意: Commentator Mike
  243. SafeNow 说:

    An FBI memo last August essentially deemed those skeptical of the controlled explanation of events to be potential terrorists. But that was only the FBI — Flight 800 coverup, FISA abuse, nothing to see here. But this is Facebook. With an exclamation point, as Ron notes. There is a Little Rascals episode in which the Rascals build a 2-section fire truck, and the Rascal manning the rear section steers wide, and comes even with Spanky, who is steering up front. Spanky says, “Where yuh going?!?”. The reply is “I don’t know, but I’m on my way.”

  244. MH 说:

    Look, I don’t have FB, but I noticed today, reading a MSM Austrian paper, Kurier, that there are only a few comments to each article as compared to the free online media, with hundreds of comments. That shows how important the ban on FB is, for this publication.

  245. Ozymandias 说:
    @Erebus

    I asked if you had a source. As you’d actually sucked that out of your thumb, you had nothing so you threw up a fog hoping to obfuscate the issue.

    No. Your quibble was that instead of providing you with a single source I provided many of them. The original report was in the Financial Times, which you can’t read without a subscription, and I doubt your mom will give you the money. So here it is on a mirror site:

    Taiwan said its doctors had heard from mainland colleagues that medical staff were getting ill — a sign of human-to-human transmission. Taipei officials said they reported this to both International Health Regulations (IHR), a WHO framework for exchange of epidemic prevention and response data between 196 countries, and Chinese health authorities on December 31.

    https://amp.ft.com/content/2a70a02a-644a-11ea-a6cd-df28cc3c6a68

    • 回复: @d dan
  246. @Ron Unz

    How do you avoid those logical contradictions?

    非常简单。

    https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden/preliminary-in-season-estimates.htm

    There is no contradiction. The virus was present in the USA since at least early Fall, if not before.

  247. trickster 说:
    @Art

    You mean like when Adolph burned all those decadent Jewish books and banned others it was a bad anti semetic, racist, Aryan thing that was the first step to the holocost oops I mean the holohoax but now that Zuker Jew is doing the same thing and for the same reason as Adolph ie community standards it is “okay”. What a curious world we live in !

  248. There is a curious passage in this article from Virology Journal from 2005 about the efficacy of HCQ and Chloroquine at dealing with SARS-COV (and likely SARS-COV-2):

    Since chloroquine inhibited SARS-CoV infection when added before or after infection, we hypothesized that another common lysosomotropic agent, NH4Cl, might also function in a similar manner. Ammonium chloride has been widely used in studies addressing endosome-mediated virus entry. Coincidently, NH4Cl was recently shown to reduce the transduction of pseudotype viruses decorated with SARS-CoV spike protein [17,18]. In an attempt to examine if NH4Cl functions similarly to chloroquine, we performed infection analyses in Vero E6 cells before (Fig. ​(Fig.4A)4A) and after (Fig. ​(Fig.4B)4B) they were treated with various concentrations of NH4Cl. In both cases, we observed a 93–99% inhibition with NH4Cl at ≥ 5 mM. These data indicated that NH4Cl (≥ 5 mM) and chloroquine (≥ 10 μM) are very effective in reducing SARS-CoV infection. These results suggest that effects of chloroquine and NH4Cl in controlling SARS CoV infection and spread might be mediated by similar mechanism(s).

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1232869/

    Does that mean ammonium chloride will be effective at treating Covid-19?

    • 回复: @Dave Bowman
    , @Mike P
  249. d dan 说:
    @Ozymandias

    ” The original report was in the Financial Times, which you can’t read without a subscription, …”

    LOL. This is getting hilarious. Many people in Asia already know how this fake news started, without access to Financial Times. But of course, you are so “sophisticated” with your paid subscription of such “high” esteem newspaper.

    Try something free instead – go to some Taiwanese blogs to listen directly from the horse’s mouth. Oops, never mind, you don’t know Chinese.

    So, listen to Erebus’ friendly advice. Take a break, disappear for a few days. You can come back later to some other threads (hopefully posting something you are more knowledgeable about), and nobody will notice it. There are plenty of idiots already – most serious people won’t remember your name.

    • 回复: @Ozymandias
  250. trickster 说:
    @Bill Jones

    Perhaps what I said was misunderstood. Some writers like Karlin and Roberts do not like their work challenged. My feeling is this, if a writer does not like this then he should not write after all even world renowned authors have their critics whether well meaning or not and whether justified or not.

    Therefore especially where these two are concerned when a reader vehemently disagrees or challenges the writer UR “moderates” the comments ie they are not published. My feeling is that RU should make it clear to them that there will be no censoring of any comments since the site promotes free speech. If said writers find that unacceptable then they are free to publish elsewhere. Other fellows like Gilad write and defend themselves AND their work even against the trolls who sometimes seem hell bent on mischief and getting people worked up.

    Therefore I reiterate the site either promotes free speech or it does not. As such while Ron DOES for the most part allow anyone to speak freely this has to be so 100% and he needs to make that clear to ALL writers. Hence my comment that Ron cannot have it both ways. Either it is his site and he calls the shots or he starts allowing Tom Dick and Harry to censor challenges. If this continues as a trend then soon every writer will feel entitled to eliminate comments they deem unacceptable. At that point the site becomes like most others, you can say what you want but you waste time writing it as it will not be published.

    I hope this clarifies what I meant to say.

  251. Erebus 说:

    Taipei officials said they reported this (human-human transmission) to both International Health Regulations (IHR), a WHO framework for exchange of epidemic prevention and response data between 196 countries, and Chinese health authorities 十二月31.

    The FT is lying. Taiwan did not 报告 anything. They 要求 信息。

    Dec 31 was when the first lab report came back with the verdict “Corona virus”.

    Last month, Taiwan said it had received no reply from the WHO to a December 31 query for information on the outbreak in Wuhan, including whether it could be transmitted between people.

    The WHO has said the email it received made no mention of human-to-human transmission.

    In Taipei on Saturday, Health Minister Chen Shih-chung quoted the text of the email written in English that the government sent to the WHO.

    News resources today indicate that at least seven atypical pneumonia cases were reported in Wuhan, China,” Chen said, reading the email.

    “Their health authorities replied to the media that the cases were believed not to be Sars [Severe acute respiratory syndrome], however the samples are still under examination, and cases have been isolated for treatment,” 他继续。

    “I would greatly appreciate if you have relevant information to share with us.”

    In a statement on Saturday, the WHO said, “We have asked how they communicated this to us, because we are only aware of that one email that makes no mention of human-to-human transmission, but they haven’t replied.”

    https://news.rthk.hk/rthk/en/component/k2/1520148-20200411.htm

    Look, it’s well established that that Wuhan/Hubei’s public health bureaucracy dropped the ball in December. Complacency and careerism are endemic to bureaucracies, and this was no exception. After Dec 31’s Lab Report, things moved rather quickly as it was escalated to the national level.

    The Wit(less) House, meanwhile had reports from the NCMI starting in mid-Nov, and continuously through December. They were so concerned that meetings related to the outbreak were classified Top Secret, held in a secure room and its best public health experts were excluded.

    Who (pun intended) was hiding what?

    The sands stretch pretty far indeed from where you are, Ozzy.

    • 回复: @flashlight joe
  252. trickster 说:
    @trickster

    Mr. Hack, free speech is free speech including the back and forth, foul language, name calling and so forth. Other UR readers can form their own conclusions but the site does say you can say what you want. Otherwise in my opinion it becomes like a Soviet environment where a single word can send you to the gulag. It is my experience that Russians do not like to be contradicted, called names, engage in back and forth or be the object of foul language. It seems to me that this was de rigeur under the Soviet system and Karlin may be a product of that. However I find that unacceptable. I am retired now but I rose to the top of the stack in my career turning around companies that were failures and I was well paid. There was a secret to doing this which was ANY employee could come and speak to me at ANYTIME and say exactly what they wanted. My experience is that anytime one inhibits free speech for any reason it always leads to suppression, resentment and then problems. I never liked what I heard sometimes and abhorred the names senior management was called but for the most part I think the people I listened to, some of them very belligerent from frustration, appreciated and respected me for just allowing them to say exactly what was on their mind. Was I successful ? I retired at the age of 35 ! That has been my experience. Others may have had different experiences and feel differently. That is their choice. Free speech is FREE speech.

  253. Either the French are very poor liars or this thing had been circulating outside China in December:

    https://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2020/05/04/world/europe/04reuters-health-coronavirus-france.html

    PARIS — A French hospital which has retested old samples from pneumonia patients discovered that it treated a man who had COVID-19 as early as Dec. 27, nearly a month before the French government confirmed its first cases.

    Yves Cohen, head of resuscitation at the Avicenne and Jean Verdier hospitals in the northern suburbs of Paris, told BFM TV that scientists had retested samples from 24 patients treated in December and January who tested negative for the flu.

    “在 24 人中,我们有一个人在 19 月 27 日对 COVID-XNUMX 呈阳性,”他周日告诉新闻频道。

    Of course, it could also be that the French are just very poor at the science thing.

    • 回复: @res
  254. ThomasT 说:

    Maybe the author missed the piece by top bi-warfare scientist Dr. Boyle. “The size of the molecules are maybe 120 microns, which indicates to me we are dealing with nanotechnology. That’s [something]you need to do in a BSL4. Biological weapons nanotechnology is so dangerous, people working with it have to wear a moon suit with portable air …

    We also know that one of the cooperating institutions [to Wuhan BSL4]was Harvard, and that the chairman of the Harvard chemistry department, [Dr. Charles Lieber], a specialist in nanotechnology, set up an entire laboratory in Wuhan where [according to reports]he specialized in applying nanotechnology to chemistry and biology.

    My guess is, based on what I’ve read in the literature, that they tried to weaponize all that together. And that is SARS-CoV-2 that we are dealing with now. So, it’s SARS, which is genetically engineered biowarfare agent to begin with. Second, it has gain-of-function properties, which makes it more lethal, more infectious. It has HIV in there. That was confirmed by an Indian scientist … and it looks like nanotechnology [has been used]… An MIT scientist who did a study found that it traveled 27 feet through the air. And that, I guess, was in lab conditions.

    That, I think, is why it’s so infectious, and that is what I believe we are dealing with here …

  255. RodW 说:
    @Realist

    Interesting. It could be the typical suspicious nannying of FB, but I wonder if FB is also beginning to feel the economic pinch. Could they be trying to ration their servers and free up space for ‘nice’ users? Their ad revenue must be down severely at the moment.

    • 回复: @Realist
  256. Ozymandias 说:
    @d dan

    Sorry, Chuckles, but your story is unraveling. Get used to it, this is just the beginning.

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/05/03/ministers-fully-aware-china-covering-extent-coronavirus-outbreak/

    • 回复: @d dan
  257. Richard B 说:
    @UmHello

    I will defend to the death your right to say it.

    A noble gesture.

    But, if Ron doesn’t feel the same way, you might want to reconsider it.

  258. @Fran Taubman

    FB is not a government site, it is a private enterprise and as such has the right to decide on its content

    And a bakery is a private enterprise and can it refuse to bake wedding cakes for same sex couples? Starbucks is a private enterprise and can it refuse non-customer POC junkies to use its bathrooms? Why is it that only these kind of bans directed at those practicing free speech are allowed? And of course approved of by Fran Taubman.

    • 回复: @Fran Taubman
  259. Realist 说:
    @RodW

    It could be the typical suspicious nannying of FB, but I wonder if FB is also beginning to feel the economic pinch.

    My comment was in reference to The Unz Review.

  260. @Peripatetic Commenter

    Does that mean ammonium chloride will be effective at treating Covid-19

    I think it means, to a balanced, open-minded and rational observer / commenter, that that seems fairly likely.

  261. New insights on the antiviral effects of chloroquine against coronavirus: what to expect for COVID-19?

    2. Antiviral properties of chloroquine
    In vitro, chloroquine appears as a versatile bioactive agent reported to possess antiviral activity against RNA viruses as diverse as rabies virus [16], poliovirus [17], HIV [12,[18], [19], [20], hepatitis A virus [21,22], hepatitis C virus [23], influenza A and B viruses [24], [25], [26], [27], influenza A H5N1 virus [28], Chikungunya virus [29], [30], [31], Dengue virus [32,33], Zika virus [34], Lassa virus [35], Hendra and Nipah viruses [36,37], Crimean–Congo hemorrhagic fever virus [38] and Ebola virus [39], as well as various DNA viruses such as hepatitis B virus [40] and herpes simplex virus [41].The antiviral properties of chloroquine described in vitro have sometimes been confirmed during treatment of virus-infected patients but have not always been reproduced in clinical trials depending on the disease, the concentration of chloroquine used, the duration of treatment and the clinical team in charge of the trial.

  262. VRezzori 说:

    I just tried sending a friend a link to unz.com in Facebook Messenger and received an immediate warning message that I could face suspension from that service for sharing “banned or abusive content.” The link was not sent and I had to spell out “unz dot com.” This was in a PRIVATE conversation between two people. Unbe-fucking-lievable.

    I should point out that the ban on links to Unz is obviously so easy to circumvent that the point must be to intimidate people and put wrong thinkers on a list. Imagine the phone company suspending service because you use a word they don’t like….. And yes, I know I’m dumb for using FB messenger anyway, but this particular friend uses it and it’s how we communicate.

  263. d dan 说:
    @Ozymandias

    “Sorry, Chuckles, but your story is unraveling. Get used to it, this is just the beginning.”

    Diversion from one issue (“Taiwan notifies WHO”) to different allegations may work for idiots or kids, but not for serious people. I still suggest you try let this thread a rest.

    In case you are really interested in what happens and want to learn, Erebus explains it in comment #261. It is meant to be a “reply” to you.

    • 回复: @Ozymandias
    , @Ozymandias
  264. Ozymandias 说:
    @d dan

    The FT is lying. Taiwan did not report anything.
    anonymous dude on internet

    Oh, yeah, now that is a convincing argument.

    • 巨魔: d dan
  265. res 说:
    @Peripatetic Commenter

    It would be good to know what the false positive rate of the test is.

    • 回复: @Commentator Mike
  266. Ozymandias 说:
    @d dan

    轮唱

    What’s the matter d dan, things not going like you hoped? Did you even look at the link Erebus posted? Here, let me give you a view:

    Taiwan is not a WHO member, because of objections from Beijing.

    You see, China calls the tune, and WHO dances to it until they’re told to stop. And this link was supposed to somehow convince me that WHO could be trusted in regards to China. Clearly, sir, it is you and your sinophile friend who needs to shag it on over to ZH.

    这么久。

    • 回复: @d dan
    , @Ozymandias
  267. @res

    Is there a study that has assessed all these tests and concluded their reliability? Like a table of tests, what type and produced by whom, with their percentage efficiency reported. But then there could be a problem knowing who really has Covid-19 and who has just the flu. So they’d have to test for flu too and if negative for it but experiencing the symptoms they’d have to conclude that the patient has Covid-19 and then see whether the Covid-19 tests detect it or not. Shouldn’t be too difficult to conduct.

  268. The CDC data has been updated on May 5, and we can begin to get a sense of how long it takes before they are stable.

    Here are the numbers for 5/1 and 5/5:

    [更多]

    5/1 5/5
    2/1/2020 0 0
    2/8/2020 1 1
    2/15/2020 0 0
    2/22/2020 0 1
    2/29/2020 5 5
    3/7/2020 25 26
    3/14/2020 49 49
    3/21/2020 493 494
    3/28/2020 2,712 2,726
    4/4/2020 8,082 8,219
    4/11/2020 12,262 12,628
    4/18/2020 10,408 11,051
    4/25/2020 3,271 4,521
    5/2/2020 189

    Unfortunately the numbers will not line up properly. The first column of numbers is from 5/1 the second from 5/5.

    So, it seems that the further back we go the less likely the numbers are to change.

    It also looks like we are over the hump and the max was around 12,500-13,000 deaths.

    It will be interesting to see the numbers next week.

  269. Apparently Unz Review has decided to go down with the QAnon ship by publishing dumb Koch-tier articles to “reopen America”. Sad. Guys, if we wanted to have the Mitch McConnell angle, we’d just watch Fox News. I thought this was an alternative site. Why not publish some Alt-Right articles?

  270. d dan 说:
    @Ozymandias

    “Taiwan is not a WHO member, because of objections from Beijing.”

    “You see, China calls the tune, and WHO dances to it until they’re told to stop.”

    Hahaha, another post yet another new topic.

    You obviously don’t know how it works. WHO is part of UN. Since Taiwan is not a member of UN, and therefore not a “country” by UN standard, it is not a member of WHO by default. Only the host country (China) can allow Taiwan to be a member of WHO. Don’t like it – go and change UN/WHO charter.

  271. @Saggy

    If you have a point to make, spit it out.

    I have better things to do than to listen to 3 videos from unknown talking heads to try to read your mind.

  272. @Commentator Mike

    Calm yourself down. That is a terrible example re: Bakery. FB cannot ban anyone for being gay or black, and a bakery cannot refuse to sell a cake to a gay person. But if someone comes into the bakery and asks them to bake a cake and put “fuck everyone in the ass” on their cake they can refuse they have a right as a company to control the contents of their product, maybe not the people they sell it to.
    Every business to a set of guidelines that they feel match their business plan and moral obligations, to gain the trust of the consumer who is buying their product.

    Facebook is a social, not a political platform. It is for friends and family to share their lives with, from all over the world. It is about connections, not about political manifestos, therefore the people that join FB have trust that the company will provide content that is not destructive to them or their children. If you want to go to a political platform their are sites for that, like here on UR. People do not like anarchy, dystopian ideas, conspiracy theories that are racially motivated, or frightening. That is a fair exchange for a company to make for people to sign on with their friends and family. That is what FB is as a company a place for friends and family.

    FB therefore has a right to ban content which they deem destructive to their product and image. They cannot ban people but they can ban content. Huge difference to bakery sales to gays.
    People feel frightened by Covid. FB does not want to publish conspiracy theories about the government plotting against its citizens.

    Lets face it the internet did not turn out like we had hoped, and it has created huge problems, that need to be dealt with in a reasonable way. You cannot just claim freedom of speech. People are easily manipulated. The internet has a negative dystopian side to it, and has created and planted dangerous misinformation to gullible people, and in some caused mass murders to feel validated.
    There is a reckoning coming. It is just the beginning of banning content. Get used to it.

  273. @Fran Taubman

    Facebook is a social, not a political platform.

    I don’t know if that is explicitly stated. It is also a business platform and encourages businesses to use it. I’m sure it is also used for political purposes but FB decides which it will allow and which it will ban. I don’t use it so I don’t know much about it. But sure, if it was exclusively what you stated, that it is for friends and family to exchange photos and personal messages then I’d have no problem if they banned all business, politics, religion, or whatever else, but I don’t think that’s possible either.

    FB does not want to publish conspiracy theories about the government plotting against its citizens.

    So they’re not the government but work for the government yet don’t want to act as a government utility.

    People are easily manipulated.

    Sure, and governments and MSM, FB, etc. are the major manipulators banning dissenting voices to be heard.

    The internet has a negative dystopian side to it, and has created and planted dangerous misinformation to gullible people, and in some caused mass murders to feel validated.

    The biggest mass murderers are the governments and they are given a platform to spread their lies on all MSM and the Internet, including Colin Powell shaking a vial of white powder in the UN, a lie and fake news that resulted in more deaths, chaos, dystopia in the Middle East than any lunatic spree killer. I know that’s the way of the world but people should have a right to point out their lies and conspiracies without being banned or harassed for it, at least in so-called democracies. They even banned David Icke who only wants to save planet Earth from those evil alien elites from outer space who plan to cull humanity – nice show.

    There is a reckoning coming. It is just the beginning of banning content. Get used to it.

    I see you’ll be happy about it – uncork the champagne!

    • 回复: @Fran Taubman
  274. MEH 0910 说:

    史蒂夫·塞勒(Steve Sailer) 转推了:


    [更多]

  275. Justsaying 说:
    @alex in San Jose AKA Digital Detroit

    Agreed. Facebook needs to be renamed Fuckbook,

  276. Truth3 说:

    Facebook is a Mossad Operation from the get go.

    • 回复: @Anonymous
  277. Truth3 说:

    Imagine the reaction to 联合国 if it was say… COUGHLIN.COM, run by an Irish Catholic Priest.

    Firebombs?

    Poison in the ear?

    Complete IRS shutdown of all and any affiliated or posting?

    SWAT teams breaking in to get the computers?

    Mysterious sinkholes swallowing up the building where the computers were housed?

    Accidentally bombed by an F-16 doing target practice 100 miles away?

    You hopefully get the picture.

  278. anon[248]• 免责声明 说:
    @T. Weed

    So you read an article that was essentially college roommate gossip and that was it, you were good, you never went to FB.
    You’re an idiot. People usually have valid reasons to not go to FB, not bc they believed one piece of college gossip.

  279. Anonymous[248]• 免责声明 说:
    @Truth3

    Yeah, those Mossad college students at Hahvahd, you obsessed mongoloid

    • 回复: @Truth3
  280. CSFurious 说:

    这并不让我感到惊讶。 当您看到扎克伯格在 ABC 接受采访时谈论“虚假信息”时,怎么可能让任何人感到惊讶。 扎克看起来和听起来都像一个反社会人士。

    • 回复: @Skeptikal
  281. Truth3 说:
    @Anonymous

    Yeah, some asshole under the anonymous tag labels me a mongoloid (can’t you do better?) when I point out the obvious Truth.

    Right, moron. You earned half a piece of foreskin jerkey from your handler at best. Chew on it.

  282. Truth3 说:
    @Fran Taubman

    Wrong again clown.

    I don’t need to sell to anybody.

    The government also cannot legally make me.

    Unless, like you Jews want to do, by turning us into a Jewoligopoly… where basic rights are replaced by “what’s good for the Jews”.

    You’ll have to kill a million of us first.

    The internet did not turn out like you hoped?

    真是个屁。

  283. @Commentator Mike

    I am not disagreeing with your opposing sentiment. I see both sides and as I said it is a problem.
    The governmental powers have committed great crimes and awful wars. But they are still an elected group from a democratic republic. The anti government forces are dark and we do not know who is manipulating the information.
    We have admitted our mistakes and moved on. Transparency is all you can ask for. I trust the existing power structure however compromised then a bunch of conspiracy nuts, with malicious intents on humans.
    Uncork the champagne. Not quite. The Jews have been hit hard by Islamist and their left wing sympathizers, that revive Medieval Christian myths about the Jews. It is is propaganda and evil.
    Just my opinion. That is why I am on this site in case you have not noticed. I am engaging as much as I can.

  284. d dan 说:
    @Fran Taubman

    “Facebook is a social, not a political platform….”

    Blah, blah… Thanks for showing your true color – an unashamed apologist of FuckBook. I am very sure “hate-China” is considered a “social” group for you:

    https://www.facebook.com/hate.china/

    • 回复: @Fran Taubman
  285. Ozymandias 说:
    @Ozymandias

    You obviously don’t know how it works. WHO is part of UN. Since Taiwan is not a member of UN, and therefore not a “country” by UN standard, it is not a member of WHO by default.

    And you’re obviously being dishonest. Taiwan is not a member of the UN because China blocked them from becoming a member. The UN has been completely corrupted by China, just like everything else those lying bastards touch. Including you, chinaboi.

    • 巨魔: d dan
    • 回复: @Anon
  286. Mike P 说:
    @Peripatetic Commenter

    Does that mean ammonium chloride will be effective at treating Covid-19?

    Ammonium chloride at those concentrations, systemically applied, would be toxic.

  287. Anon[544]• 免责声明 说:
    @Ozymandias

    The United Nations General Assembly, led by th US, voted to admit the People’s Republic of China (mainland China) and to expel the Republic of China (Taiwan). You should thank the US for it.

    • 回复: @d dan
  288. @d dan

    China has a lot to answer for. If it was the US that did not reveal the truth about how contagious Covid. was and put the world population at risk. People would be calling for WW3. The Chi-Coms are ruthless. Sounds like you are a Chinese apologist.
    对你有好处。

    • 回复: @d dan
  289. d dan 说:
    @Anon

    “The United Nations General Assembly, led by th US, voted to admit the People’s Republic of China (mainland China) and to expel the Republic of China (Taiwan). You should thank the US for it.”

    Actually US voted to keep Taiwan. But don’t need to keep educating this clown called Ozymandias. He thinks that PRC “blocked them (Taiwan) from becoming a member”, even though PRC wasn’t even a member of UN at that time.

    See this map: Green countries in favor of PRC, red countries wanted to keep Taiwan. Note PRC couldn’t even vote:

    • 回复: @Anon
    , @Commentator Mike
  290. Anon[544]• 免责声明 说:
    @d dan

    The US was behind the scene doing all the work, pushing other countries to vote for China. The solution was passed in 1971; President Richard M. Nixon arrived in China for an official trip in 1972. I don’t need to explain why the US or Nixon wanted to make that move.

    • 回复: @showmethereal
  291. d dan 说:
    @Fran Taubman

    “Facebook is a social, not a political platform….” – by Fran Taubman

    “…I am very sure “hate-China” is considered a “social” group for you:

    https://www.facebook.com/hate.china/ ” – by d dan

    “China has a lot to answer for….” – by Fran Taubman

    Haha, yet another clown who uses diversion when confronted with contradicting fact.

  292. MEH 0910 说:

    • 回复: @SolontoCroesus
  293. 罗恩

    这只是来自时代 RE:Facebook。
    You can appeal. They are putting together a panel of over 2000 people of different backgrounds to review content.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/06/opinion/facebook-oversight-board.html?referringSource=articleShare

    今天,宣布了监督委员会的第一批成员。 我们是四位联合主席。 在Facebook选拔我们之后,在我们采访并最终批准了今天宣布的其他16名成员之前,我们考虑了很多人参加监督委员会,包括公众推荐的人。

    董事会成员来自不同的专业,文化和宗教背景,具有不同的政治观点。 我们中的一些人公开批评了Facebook。 我们中有些人还没有。 但是我们所有人都有培训和经验,可以帮助董事会考虑在线社区面临的最重要的内容决策。 我们都独立于Facebook。 我们都致力于在国际人权规范的框架内实现言论自由。 我们将基于这些原则以及对Facebook用户和社会的影响做出决策,而不考虑公司的经济,政治或声誉利益。

    • 回复: @Usura
  294. @MEH 0910

    Great Courses & Modern Scholar are almost totally tilted to the Jew view of the world.

    A Modern Scholar series on Epochs of World History (or something like that) opens with a double-lecture on The Jews, who, it is claimed, “set the standard for ethical monotheism” and through Jewry’s sense of “choseness” set the template for the “nation state.” [I still don’t understand that logic.]

    Throughout the course, civilizations are measured against “the Jews.”

    Part of Elan Carr’s project to “make people love Jews”?

    Or part of an attempt to revise not only history of the world wars of 20th century but ALL of history?

    • 同意: tomo
    • 回复: @Fran Taubman
  295. @SolontoCroesus

    Or part of an attempt to revise not only history of the world wars of 20th century but ALL of history?

    Wow all of history. SC.? Maybe you can help out. You seem to have figured it all out.

    • 回复: @SolontoCroesus
  296. @d dan

    Yes, Ozymandias knows nothing about this and shouldn’t be commenting. Taiwan was on original founding member of the UN in 1945 and a member of the Security Council along with the other four nuclear superpowers. PR China replaced it.

  297. @Fran Taubman

    “. . . [attempt of Jews to] revise not only history of the world wars of 20th century but ALL of history?”

    Wow all of history . . .?

    We’ll take that as your admission that Jews DO seek to revise the history of the world wars. . . .

    • 同意: tomo
  298. Wielgus 说:
    @Fran Taubman

    Note the obvious confidence that pro-Israel content won’t be banned. Wonder why that is?

    • 回复: @Fran Taubman
  299. @Wielgus

    Pro anything will not get banned. I mean do you have a brain. Pro Islam will not get banned. Pro Palestinian etc.
    It is the racist conspiracies theories that will get banned against. If you want to blame climate change on Islamist and claim they injected something in thermosphere, that should be banned.
    Dystopian, negative, dark web content will be banned. S&M will be banned.
    用你的大脑。

    • 回复: @anonymous
  300. Mr. Unz, take heart. If you were Palestinian, you’d have no chance to appeal the decision, even if you were just posting a video of Israeli squatters attacking Palestinian farmers:

    Facebook deactivates dozens of accounts of Palestinian journalists and activists

    Dozens of Palestinians logged into their Facebook accounts on 4 May, only to find out their pages were no longer active.

    In the space of one day, more than 50 Palestinian journalists and activists had their profile pages deleted by Facebook, alongside a notification saying their pages had been deactivated for “not following our Community Standards.”

    “We have already reviewed this decision and it can’t be reversed,” the message continued, prompting users to read more about Facebook’s Community Standards. …

    Samer Khweira, 39, a reporter with the Al-Haya radio station in Nablus who also had his account taken down on Monday, told MEE he has been having issues with Facebook for years.

    Khweira说:“我张贴的任何内容都有被删除的风险。” “如果我发布关于定居者袭击农民或与以色列士兵发生冲突的视频,它将被删除。”

    即使是一个简单的公告,也宣布有关巴勒斯坦人被以色列部队杀害的消息都会因违反“社区标准”而从他的页面上删除。

    没有好的行为会受到惩罚。

    • 回复: @Fran Taubman
  301. @Fran Taubman

    Are you really saying with a straight face that Facebook is not a political platform/agenda? I bet you think Google doesn’t keep track of you. That Silicon Valley altruism – was as most movie stars airbrushed pictures.

    • 回复: @Fran Taubman
  302. @Anon

    You have it backwards. The US was lobbying everyone to vote for Taipei. The CIA was still highly active in supporting the KMT in Taiwan to take back mainland China. The decision to try to use Beijing against Moscow had nothing to do with not still wanting Taipei to take back Beijing. The US absolutely was against the UN voting for Beijing to take over the seat of Taipei in the UN. Stop repeating fake history.

  303. @AnonStarter

    Well Philip Giraldi is still alive and well on FB so is Gilad.

    • 回复: @Commentator Mike
  304. @showmethereal

    Call me naive, but I truly believe the FB was never meant to be a political platform it was meant to connect family and friends from all over the world. Most of the people I know on FB are not political people. There can be dedicated sites for politics. I do not know about google.

    • 回复: @showmethereal
  305. anonymous[361]• 免责声明 说:
    @Fran Taubman

    You write of FB. policies with the confidence of someone who has the talking points memo.

    Were these policies distributed in your synagogue?

    And what’s with this tag on FB pages: “The new Facebook.com is coming to this browser.”
    What’s the “new Facebook” — Israel first all the time?

    问一个朋友

  306. Skeptikal 说:
    @CSFurious

    ” Zuck looks and sounds like a sociopath.”

    想想看,Zuck 和 Jared Kush 都有那种乳胶脸的样子,就像他们是在机械作品上覆盖着人造皮肤的机器人。

    Separated at birth in Dr. Frankenstein’s lab somewhere in Langley, or Tel Aviv??

    • 回复: @Colin Wright
  307. @Fran Taubman

    @FT

    “Well Philip Giraldi is still alive and well on FB so is Gilad.”

    I was going to say one is CIA and the other is a Jew – well there I said it.

    • 回复: @AnonStarter
  308. @Skeptikal

    ‘…Come to think of it, both Zuck and Jared Kush have that latex-face look, like they are bots with artificial skin pulled over their mechanical works…’

    Oh, Zuck just looks like kind of a geek. Evil Tintin gives me the creeps.

  309. Ron Unz 说:

    Well, someone pointed me to a new Facebook report, explaining why various websites including ours had recently been banned. But I’m *非常* skeptical:

    https://about.fb.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/April-2020-CIB-Report.pdf

    If you use Ctrl-F to search for “unz” you’ll discover that we were allegedly banned for being “associated” with the anti-immigration website VDare, which was also banned at the same time. I find this quite unlikely.

    Although we do republish VDare articles, the fraction of our total content that represents has been steadily dropping over the years, and is probably down to just 2% or so these days. Moreover, according to Alexa our traffic has been a dozen times greater than that of VDare, making it unlikely that we were banned merely as a sidebar to their purge.

    Indeed, since immigration issues have been totally pushed aside by the deadly disease epidemic, I can’t even remember the last time we ran something in that area as a main feature.

    By contrast, our coverage of the deadly Coronavirus epidemic has been overwhelming for the last couple of months, and my own most popular article—both in traffic and Facebook likes—outlined the considerable circumstantial evidence that America’s current disaster was the result of an American biowarfare attack against China (and Iran).

    With Facebook under enormous pressure to ban all “Coronavirus conspiracy theories,” this is the obvious reason for our removal. But admitting that fact would obviously be counter-productive, so rather ridiculous claims about VDare were instead used as an excuse.

  310. tomo 说:
    @St-Germain

    I noticed this – and I get around it by taking a screen shot of UNZ articles and posting it on FB telling my FB friends how great the article is and to get the URL from the screenshot

  311. HeebHunter 说:

    Come on. This has nothing to do with the pandemic. They have always looked for an excuse to shut you down.
    Non-Kosher media are not allowed on the mainstream anymore.

  312. @Erebus

    @Erebus,

    “Look, it’s well established that that Wuhan/Hubei’s public health bureaucracy dropped the ball in December”

    应该:

    “Look, it’s official news that Wuhan/Hubei’s public health bureaucracy dropped the ball in December”

    菲菲

    • 回复: @Erebus
  313. kikz 说:

    yep, last wk, i got nailed 9 times ‘community standards/spam’ for sharing VDARE articles over the span of some days, so i knew y’all, UNZ, would be next. i’ve so many 30days bans frm fb, lost count… surprised though they “only you can see this post” only prevented my ‘shares’ instead of giving me a timeout for being naughty……

  314. This is probably of small significance and equally small help, but, for what it’s worth, — and of course don’t publish this comment if it is somehow considered undesired information — a site named 格林维尔邮报 has published Ron Unz’s AP article, and it is shareable on Facebook:

    https://www.greanvillepost.com/2020/04/21/american-pravda-our-coronavirus-catastrophe-as-biowarfare-blowback/

    As there is no FB plugin on 格林维尔邮报, it is necessary to copy the url into your FB page, and then share it.

  315. GazaPlanet 说:
    @Fran Taubman

    Facebook feeds are controlled by the decisions of the user. Facebook only wants the Jewish line fed to the masses, they don’t want free association of people discussing openly and without constraint Jewish control. Facebook is a monopoly with vast political power, it is not free enterprise, it is a system of surveillance in league with governments seeking the de facto overthrow of the rights of citizens.

    The solution to this problem is coming, and it doesn’t matter who facebook censors. But we should recognize those who support Jewish monopoly media for what they are: subverters of freedom.

    • 同意: Commentator Mike
    • 回复: @Fran Taubman
  316. @Commentator Mike

    “Well Philip Giraldi is still alive and well on FB so is Gilad.”

    This reminds me of the argument that Palestinians are well off because they have malls with KFC — never mind that they can’t properly treat raw sewage or enjoy the benefits of electricity as the rest of the world does.

    It’s like saying a massacre isn’t so bad because a couple of prospective victims survived. With logic like this, who needs nonsense?

  317. @Fran Taubman

    Well sorry – I have to call you naive. FB is just like Hollywood… It propagates and agenda. A ultra liberal – humanistic agenda. And it controls information to control the thoughts of the masses. Connecting families doesn’t make you a multi billion dollar company. Controlling information does.

  318. @Ron Unz

    By contrast, our coverage of the deadly Coronavirus epidemic has been overwhelming for the last couple of months, and my own most popular article—both in traffic and Facebook likes—outlined the considerable circumstantial evidence that America’s current disaster was the result of an American biowarfare attack against China (and Iran).

    Ron I thought that you recanted your American bio warfare article, to say that Covid started in Wuhan either in the market or in a lab? Where do you currently stand on the origins of the virus?

  319. @GazaPlanet

    What is the solution? FB is a private company they can control content as they see it matches their market. You can file a monopoly case against them like the the AT&T or the railroads, and start a competitive company with a different content criteria. But you sound pretty hysterical to think that because FB does not want to be involved with conspiracy theories against the US or Jews that it is under Jewish control. Ludicrous really. Most Christians I know do not want to see Jew hatred on FB.

    • 回复: @Anonymous
  320. Anonymous[361]• 免责声明 说:
    @Fran Taubman

    Most Christians I know do not want to see Jew hatred on FB.

    无价。
    Has MFA updated the hasbara manual again?

    “Jew hatred” is strictly a Jewish obsession. Most Christians are simply not that neurotic; they’re not injected with “hate” from the moment of 分娩 概念。

    顺便说一句, 弗兰·陶布曼(Fran Taubman), who’s really writing these comments under your tag? The propaganda committee at your synagogue? Handler from AIPAC?
    They’re far too coherent in a boilerplate kinda style for the grammarly-challenged Fran Taubman Unz readers know.

    • 回复: @Fran Taubman
  321. @Anonymous

    LOL. You can google my name and see that I am accomplished artist/engineer and fabricator. I design and build my own furniture and sell it all over the world. I think I can handle writing my own posts far better then any handler. I am not sure I understand your comment. My comments are far too coherent, yet grammarly-challenged? That makes no sense. If I am coherent how can I be grammarly (that is not a word) challenged? I am also 66 and grew up in a religious Jewish home with many WW2 survivors. I know Jews and Judaism from personal experience and have extensive historical knowledge of the history of Jews. Many of my earlier posts were more emotional charged. During my time on UR I have gotten better at writing. Practice makes perfect.

    btw, Fran Taubman, who’s really writing these comments under your tag? The propaganda committee at your synagogue? Handler from AIPAC?
    They’re far too coherent in a boilerplate kinda style for the grammarly-challenged Fran Taubman Unz readers know.

    BTW “Jew hatred” is strictly a Jewish obsession. A Jewish obsession. Are you familiar with UR? Many people on this site have a Jewish obsession. It is one of the main points of this site. To countermand the MSM pro Jewish narrative. Well it’s obvious no one of any intelligence is writing your copy. That is one of the most ignorant and stupid comments I have read on here in a while. You should try stand up.

    • 回复: @Iris
  322. Anon[296]• 免责声明 说:

    The problem is that the front page of Unz always has a holocaust denial something-or-other on it.

    This is why none of Steve’s loyal readers are comfortable passing along links to his pieces.

    It seems like a very minor and reasonable compromise would be to have all the holocaust and Nazi stuff in the world here, but just not link any of it from the top page.

    So I don’t think you should read too much into the timing. From time to time people are reporting you. It was only a matter of time that you’d be banned, because the human checker opened up the site and saw something like “Featured Book: The Hoax of the Presumed Extermination of Jewry.”

    • 回复: @utu
  323. Erebus 说:
    @flashlight joe

    应该:

    “Look, it’s official news that Wuhan/Hubei’s public health bureaucracy dropped the ball in December”

    Yes, in the official Chinese press as well, which covered the wholesale firing and replacement of Wuhan/Hubei’s public health authorities.

    From Xinhuanet:


    WUHAN, Feb. 4 (Xinhua) — The discipline inspection authorities in China have strengthened supervision and taken strict measures to deal with unqualified and derelict officials during the prevention and control of the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV).

    On Tuesday, a Red Cross Society official in central China’s Hubei Province and a government official in Wuhan, the provincial capital, also the epicenter of the epidemic outbreak, were removed from their posts. Meanwhile, two other government officials in Wuhan were penalized following a health official’s removal from office in another city in the province hit hard by the novel coronavirus recently.

    Misconduct including dereliction of duty and misappropriation of relief funds and materials will be investigated and handled in accordance with the law, said a guideline issued by the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection of the Communist Party of China (CPC) and the National Supervisory Commission.

    Widen the beam on your flashlight, joe.

  324. Anonymous[387]• 免责声明 说:

    Does Facebook keep its traffic numbers close to its vest? Or does it publicise them constantly as part of its never-ending efforts to attract advertising dollars?

    The reason I ask is because I am wondering if the (presumed) increase in unz.com’s traffic over the past 90 days has actually 突破 Facebook’s when both numbers are expressed as “an uptick of X percent” in traffic to the respective sites.

    有人知道吗?

  325. @Ron Unz

    Indeed, since immigration issues have been totally pushed aside by the deadly disease epidemic

    Indeed, they have been made totally irrelevant for the foreseeable future. There will be no more immigration in the foreseeable future. And no one accepts refugees from a pandemic for obvious reasons. The anti-immigration crowd has “won”. In fact, I believe that the pro-immigration crowd was not as a rule really pro-immigrants or pro-refugees in their hearts. Many of them are jumping for joy that immigration has stopped as a side effect of the pandemic (supposing it is merely a side effect). They keep their humanitarian aura intact and their problem is solved, both at the same time.

    To have used the immigration issue as an excuse for banning you at this precise moment has a perversity all its own. And I wonder if they haven’t banned VDARE for the sole purpose of making that excuse stick.

    • 回复: @utu
  326. Sir RonUnz…your comments about fakebook, flakebook, flapbook, flushbook, idiotbook, r well taken, inasmuch as this family subscribes to NO “social media” 4 to us, it all just seems a total waste of time, totally irrelevant, waste of \$, non productive, to say the least. We seriously doubt that no one but “flakes” indulge in any of that sheer timewaster, therefore we believe that “banning you” will simply increase your email
    readership, due to the fact that your site is totally relevant, certainly well thought out, and a true pleasure to read, which we are doing more & more of lately, & will certainly continue.
    You have our best wishes for continuing success! Expats 4 eva…tomnjing

  327. SND 说:

    The video section of Unz is gone. Is this related to the facebook matter?

  328. Iris 说:
    @Fran Taubman

    LOL. You can google my name and see that I am accomplished artist/engineer and fabricator.

    I followed your suggestion and found photos of your works on the Ralph Pucci website.

    Your pieces are hideous.

    No research, no beauty, no originality, just the same silly concept repeated over and over.

    https://ralphpucci.com/artists/fran-taubman/

    Like so many tribal creators, you have no talent but are promoted by tribal media and tribal PR.

    No wonder you have so much time posting mountains of trash on this website.

    • 谢谢: Fran Taubman
  329. @Iris

    Quite a compliment coming from you. One of the most incoherent and confused people on this website.

    • 回复: @Iris
  330. Iris 说:
    @Fran Taubman

    Wrong answer, Fran. Being intellectually “confused” has nothing to do with having artistic taste, as any real artist would know.

    I am happy to realise first hand that you are as much an artistic fraud as you are an ethical one.

    It reinforces my belief that Zionism is a vile ideology served only by the vilest people among your tribe, and hence cannot survive the test of time.

    • 回复: @Fran Taubman
  331. @Iris

    Being intellectually “confused” has nothing to do with having artistic taste, as any real artist would know.

    If that sentence makes sense to you that is my point. I support myself with my art. So in the most real sense I am a real artist. It is not a hobby. It is in important collections all over the world. If you do not like it that is fine. But I am a real artist.

    Whatever you are is reduced to one word a 种族主义的, and by that definition alone you have no taste, no point of view, no intellectual capacity for anything nuanced. You only have the ability to think in binary terms. Borderline retarded. That is the way a racist mind works, in small letters, with small idea. Copying what people tell you that makes you feel secure. You have never had an original idea in your life. So you would not know one if it hit you on the side of your head.

    I think big, and people appreciate my creativity. I doubt you can spell creative. Your writings on UR are so full of confused atmospherics of conspiracies that lunatics with think you are a lunatic.

    • 回复: @Iris
  332. utu 说:
    @Anon

    No, primitive Holocaust denial is very good for the Shoah business.

  333. utu 说:
    @Brás Cubas

    https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/05/08/business-demands-more-foreign-workers-as-33m-americans-go-jobless/
    “周四,由共和党参众两院议员组成的联盟致信特朗普总统,要求他扩大移民行政命令,暂停 H-1B 签证、H-2B 签证、H-2A 签证等外国签证工人计划,和 OPT 计划,而数百万美国人仍然失业。”

    • 回复: @Brás Cubas
  334. @Iris

    But to tell the truth, it’s no worse (well maybe some) than whatever passes for modern art these days, or sells as “modern art”. The entire concept has become meaningless in my view. But not everyone can be into classical furniture restoration. I must say I’d probably find reproduction of classical furniture a more appealing craft than creating something original that looks like almost whatever new out there. Lucky for Fran we don’t dictate taste among the consuming public.

  335. @utu

    Thank you for the link. I don’t live in the U.S., but if you would allow me an opinion on this, I would say this story describes an ongoing situation. I am betting that sanity will prevail, and the greedy plutocrats will have to put their tails between their legs (that’s probably an exclusively Portuguese-language expression; anyway I’ve never heard it said outside Brazil; it means ‘accept a loss in a resigned way’).

    • 回复: @Commentator Mike
  336. @Brás Cubas

    put their tails between their legs

    Oh, it’s a very English expression too.

    Collins dictionary:

    “with your tail between your legs” – If you say that you have your tail between your legs, you are emphasizing that you feel defeated and ashamed.

    “with one’s tail between one’s legs” – in a state of utter defeat or confusion.

    • 谢谢: Brás Cubas
  337. Usura 说:
    @Fran Taubman

    Co-Chairs of the Board (writers of the NYT article you linked):

    Prof. Jamal Greene, Lawyer, Columbia U., former legal aide to Sen. Kamala Harris
    Helle Thorning-Schmidt, former Danish PM, Social Democrat Party leader
    Michael W. McConnell, former U.S. circuit judge, Hoover Institution Fellow
    Catalina Botero Marino, Dean of Law School U. of Los Andes, Bogatá Columbia

    The full board:
    John Samples, Vice President, Cato Institute, USA
    Ronaldo Lemos, Professor, Rio de Janeiro State University’s Law School, Brazil
    Katherine Chen, Professor, National Chengchi University, Taiwan,
    Endy Bayuni, Senior Editor The Jakarta Post, Indonesia
    Alan Rusbridger, Principal, Lady Margaret Hall Oxford, UK
    Pamela Karlan, Professor, Stanford Law School, USA
    Afia Asantewaa Asare-Kyei, Manager Open Society Init. for West Africa, Senegal
    Evelyn Aswad, Professor and Chair, University of Oklahoma College of Law, USA
    Tawakkol Karman, Journalist and civil rights activist, Yemen
    Maina Kiai, Director Human Rights Watch Global Alliances and Partnerships, Kenya
    András Sajó, Founding Dean of Legal Studies, Central European University, Hungary
    Nighat Dad, Founder, Digital Rights Foundation, Pakistan
    Ronaldo Lemos, Professor, Rio de Janeiro State University’s Law School, Brazil
    Julie Owono, Executive Director, Internet Sans Frontières, Cameroon
    Sudhir Krishnaswamy, Vice Chancellor National Law School of India University, India
    Emi Palmor, Advocate and Lecturer, Interdisciplinary Center Herzliya, Israel

    Link to the full board:
    https://www.oversightboard.com/meet-the-board/

    According to the NYT article, twenty new members will be added “eventually”.

    • 谢谢: Fran Taubman
    • 回复: @Fran Taubman
    , @Brás Cubas
  338. @Usura

    Also important to repeat that FB as a private company has every right to control the content and patrons of their site. Other sites can emerge with a different content and fans.

    • 回复: @Astuteobservor II
  339. @Usura

    Ronaldo Lemos, Professor, Rio de Janeiro State University’s Law School, Brazil

    Lemos is a Soros man. He is the head of an organization which received money from the Open Society Foundation, according the source I am linking to below. He is sometimes on Brazilian TV, as a sort of technology pundit. He was one of the makers of Brazilian’s new Internet Law, which gives the State powers of control over the Internet in certain situations.

    The piece below, in Portuguese, was written by a Brazilian rightwinger:

    George Soros, o financiador da esquerda brasileira
    https://www.gazetadopovo.com.br/vozes/bruno-garschagen/george-soros-o-financiador-da-esquerda-brasileira/

    • 谢谢: Usura
  340. d dan 说:

    “The Unz Review had suddenly been banned for alleged violations of “community standards” and our own Facebook page eliminated.”

    When gangsters plan a crime through cell phones, you can’t sue the phone company for damages nor charge them as conspirators. Phone company is simply a carrier. They don’t control the content of the conversations of their clients.

    When a mechanic makes claim about the safety of your car, and if the car was involved in an accident subsequently, the mechanic is potentially liable for damages or even criminal negligence. This is because he is the only person responsible for his statement.

    Tech companies like FB, google, twitter etc are trying to have the best of both worlds. FB wants to censor users’ contents, google actively manipulates their search results and twitter removes undesirable accounts. They are explicitly admitting they look at the contents of the users or third parties, and make DECISIONS on them. Having gone down the slippery slope, they will lose the legal arguments that they are simply carriers like AT&T – which has no “community standards” for their clients. I am looking forward to hearing multi-billions lawsuits of all ingenious genre, from lawyers all over the worlds.

    • 回复: @AnonStarter
  341. @d dan

    None other than the American Bar Association advocates holding the feet of social media giants to the proverbial fire:

    https://www.americanbar.org/groups/crsj/publications/human_rights_magazine_home/the-ongoing-challenge-to-define-free-speech/in-the-age-of-socia-media-first-amendment/

    The First Amendment only limits governmental actors—federal, state, and local—but there are good reasons why this should be changed. Certain powerful private entities—particularly social networking sites such as Facebook, Twitter, and others—can limit, control, and censor speech as much or more than governmental entities. A society that cares for the protection of free expression needs to recognize that the time has come to extend the reach of the First Amendment to cover these powerful, private entities that have ushered in a revolution in terms of communication capabilities. [重点补充]

    • 同意: Miro23
    • 不同意: Fran Taubman
  342. I didn’t go through all the comments, sorry.

    只是:

    ‘www.u
    n
    z.com/etc’

    the link. If your FB friends are interested, they will take the 4 seconds to scramble it back together! (for now, until FB gets better AI!)

  343. Iris 说:
    @Fran Taubman

    I loved your dithyrambic tirade lecturing me about racism; it is very fitting from a superior being such as yourself who teaches us day in, day out, how ethical it is from the IDF to blow Palestinian kids into pieces.

    Let’s celebrate Facebook’s and yours anti-racism, and the peculiar ethics, moral values and art you and your ilk bring to world:

    • 回复: @Fran Taubman
    , @Fran Taubman
  344. @Iris

    What a low life, lets show some photos of dead children and blame it on the Jew. who does that?

    • 回复: @Iris
  345. Iris 说:
    @Fran Taubman

    I spell it for, Superior Being: those Palestinian children murdered by the IDF are the embodiment of the values Facebook, yourself, and all those wo agree with you promote and stand for.

    You should frame the picture and hang it in your lounge, to better celebrate when you host your B’nai Brith backers. I bet you already do.

    • 回复: @Fran Taubman
  346. The Doc 说: • 您的网站

    We respectfully request that FACEBOOK reinstate the UNZ REVIEW. WE are the FaceBook Community & we feel that we are being denied Meaningful Commentary by the Prior Restraint FaceBook imposes. FaceBook cooperate s willingly with US government requests, & therefore signs on to all the Constitutional Freedoms guaranteed to all those in both America & AmeriKKKa. If FB can cooperate with activities funded by Citizen Tax Dollars, then it can guarantee the Constitutional Rights of the UNZ Review. Please pass this on if you agree.

  347. @Iris

    Bullshit. No IDF killed children this is such propaganda lies.

    • 回复: @Commentator Mike
  348. @Fran Taubman

    LOL, you’re responding like Wally when anyone accuses Nazis of killing or torturing anybody anywhere.

    • 回复: @Fran Taubman
    , @Fran Taubman
  349. @Ron Unz

    This is a different take compared to my previous reply.

    The Facebook document you linked to does not say that the contents of either VDARE or Unz were the cause for their being banned. They are accusing VDARE and Unz of ‘inauthentic behavior’, i.e., association with fake accounts and robots.

    这是相关的摘录:

    The people behind this network used fake accounts to create fictitious personas, post in Groups, manage Pages, drive traffic to off-platform sites, and evade enforcement. They frequently posted about US news and topics including the US President, ideologies recognized as far-right, and anti-immigration content. Most recently, this network shared COVID-19-related conspiracies and hate speech about Asian Americans.
    We found this activity as part of our proactive investigations into suspected coordinated inauthentic
    behavior in the US ahead of the 2020 election. Although the people behind this operation attempted to conceal their coordination, our investigation linked this network to VDARE, a website known for posting anti-immigration content, and to individuals associated with a similar website The Unz Review. We continue to monitor and will take additional action if we see other violations of our Community Standards.
    ● Presence on Facebook: 19 Pages, 15 Facebook accounts, and 1 Group
    ● Followers: About 207,700 accounts followed one or more of these Pages and about 20
    accounts joined this Group.
    ● Advertising: Around \$114,000 in spending for ads on Facebook paid for in US dollars.

    Note that they mention “hate speech about Asian Americans”. Though, as I remarked earlier, it’s not stated that content was the cause for banning, I don’t remember a single article published by Unz with that kind of “hate speech”. It is a predominantly pro-China site. John Derbyshire is the only anti-China guy here I can remember, but of course he is definitely not anti “Asian Americans”, seeing as he is married to one.

  350. @Commentator Mike

    You cannot show photos of dead children and say the IDF killed them. It would be like me saying the Nazis killed them. All of these memes and photos of violence is to me very stupid.
    The IDF does not kill children, that are not threatening soldiers or civilians. Look at the death toll of Arabs since 1948. About 25,000 in 70 plus years while every life is important and death tragic. How many children died in Syria or Yemen in one year? Or by the Nazis?
    You cannot just say something and post a photo. So
    much written about Israel is lies.

    If Iris wants to post an article about the death of a child I am all ears. If you were to visit Israel you will see this is a lie. While life is not perfect. There are checkpoints etc. in the West Bank there is very little violence (not so with Gaza) you will see Religious Jews and Arabs on the streets and in malls together.
    People that make accusations need to back them up.

  351. @Commentator Mike

    The Arab population of Israel has quadrupled since the founding of Israel. By contrast the Jewish population of Europe practically wiped out. Millions of lost lives. The Jewish population of Poland went from 3 million to 300,000 during the Nazi era. Get a fucking life before you compare Israel to Nazis.

  352. geokat62 说:

    The IDF does not kill children, that are not threatening soldiers or civilians.

    More photos of dead children that “threatened” the intrepid forces of the IDF…

    IDF Shelling 4 Children on Beach

    Israel kills 15 Palestinian children in 2017

    Four Palestinian Children Killed by Israeli Airstrike

    Israel Has Killed 49 Palestinian Children Since October

    Israeli Shell Hits U.N. School in Gaza, Killing At Least 15

    • 谢谢: Iris
    • 回复: @Iris
    , @Fran Taubman
  353. Iris 说:
    @geokat62

    Facebook are deliberately and actively complicit of these crimes, as of over a billion of accounts, it is those of Palestinian journalists it chose to close.

    Being banned by Facebook is a badge of honour; their bias and anti-human agenda will become transparent to all as time goes by.

    • 回复: @geokat62
  354. @geokat62

    These are photos. Where are the stories. This is bullshit.
    Palestinians have deliberately killed and kidnapped Israeli children on school buses and Pizza parlors with suicidal bombings.
    Israel goes out of it’s way to avoid civilian deaths. Hamas bombs Israeli civilians all the time.
    Where are the stories behind these deaths.
    Showing photos of dead people is a simpletons game of who can show the goriest photos. Where is the one of the burned baby?
    You are a low life Geo posting these a real low life an thrill seeker.

    • 回复: @geokat62
  355. geokat62 说:
    @Iris

    Being banned by Facebook is a badge of honour; their bias and anti-human agenda will become transparent to all as time goes by.

    Couldn’t agree more, Iris.

    Being disparaged by Frannie is a also badge of honour; her bias and anti-human agenda will become transparent to all as time goes by.

  356. TGD 说:

    A big “Thank You” to Mr. Unz for allowing dissenters of the status quo to post on this website. I have never been on the Facebook and never will. Years ago, every day it seemed, I got emails telling me that so and so invites me to join Facebook. I ignored all of them

    I was a steady poster to “Free Republic” until a dozen years ago when I got a notice telling me that I was banned and that I should “take it to Stormfront.” Jim Robinson has culled most all of the intelligent posters to his website and what is left are a bunch of barely literate “evangeloonies.”

  357. geokat62 说:
    @Fran Taubman

    You are a low life Geo posting these a real low life an thrill seeker.

    Yes, yes… of course, Fran, I’m a naughty goy.

    But tell me something, Fran, as an ardent Zionist, are you supportive of other peoples’ quest for ethno-nationalism, like the once proud indigenous British people?

    ‘The Victims of Globalism’ I The TrUK Show

    如果没有,为什么不呢?

  358. geokat62 说:

    More bizarre manifestations we’re living in 小丑世界:

  359. @Iris

    Here Iris children starving in Yemen. Not interested because \ Jews did not starve them?
    Only when a Jew harms a child, do you post a photo. What a phony. Where is your outrage about these children?

    85,000 children have died of 饥饿 IN YEMEN. 85,000. starved by Muslims NOT BY JEWS.
    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/21/world/middleeast/yemen-famine-children.html

    merlin_145626708_b49986c9-e8fc-4581-8c7f-0103a9d8ddcc-superJumbo-1

    • 回复: @Iris
  360. geokat62 说:

    85,000 children have died of starvation IN YEMEN. 85,000. starved by Muslims NOT BY JEWS.

    Ahem! Who’s backing Saudi Arabia in their atrocious war against the Houthis in Yemen? The golem United States of Zion, that’s who.

    And why is Israel’s golem backing SA? It’s in the fulfilment of the Jewish state’s grand plan, as outlined in Oded Yinon’s Plan and PNAC’s A Clean Break Plan:

    Act I – crush the Sunni regimes (Iraq and Libya) still having the temerity to support the Palestinian people in resisting the ruthless occupation of their historic lands

    Act II – take a Sunni turn by switching sides and attacking the Shia Arc (Hezbollah, Syria, Iran) still having the temerity to support the Palestinian people in resisting the ruthless occupation of their historic lands

    Act III – push Saudi Arabia (the leader of the Sunni coalition) to confront Iran (the leader of the Shia coalition) in a Hundred Years’ War, where both sides bleed to death, while Jewish Supremacists expand Eretz Israel

    But, rather than disclose this grand plan to the dumb goyim, Fran feigns grief over the death of 85,000 Arab children.

    But if you were to inject her with a truth serum, and put the same question to her that was put to Madeleine Albright (born Marie Jana Korbelová), she’d give you the same response about the killing of 500,000 Arab children:

    Leslie Stahl of 60 Minutes – “We have heard that a half million children have died. I mean, that’s more children than died in Hiroshima. And, you know, is the price worth it?”

    Madeleine Albright – “I think this is a very hard choice, but the price–we think the price is worth it.=

    I wonder who the “we” was in that sentence?

    So, don’t let Frannie fool you. While she perceives herself as another 皇后以斯帖, whose purpose in life is to protect her people against the evil goyim who are out to kill all her people, she suffers from the same ailment as most of her co-religionists… a lack of self-awareness.

    But, like Oedipus Rex, it will be by their very actions that they will end up self-fulfilling their dire predictions.

    • 同意: Iris
  361. geokat62 说:

    This has been the No 1 task of Jewish Supremacist Organisations (JSOs) over the last century:

    …. that and opening the floodgates to mass immigration.

    Well done, JSOs!

  362. Iris 说:
    @Fran Taubman

    Wrong example, Taubman.

    The war on Yemen is carried out by Saudi Arabia in great part on behalf of Israel.

    Yemeni Shia are victimised by proxy, and slaughtered to get to Iran, Israel’s arch-enemy.

    The war on Yemen is done by an Israeli hand within a Saudi glove, just like the 9/11 slaughter of American civilians.

    Congratulation for yet another Israeli trophy; don’t forget to hang the pictures of dying Yemeni kids on your walls for your Zionist celebrations.

  363. AnonFromTN 说:

    You should be proud: being banned by FB is a badge of honor. No liar was ever banned. Pieces of shit are promoted, not banned.

    • 同意: Commentator Mike
  364. @Fran Taubman

    废话。

    Why was Christian business owners vilified on the news for not wanting to do business with non straight couples?

    It is within their rights right?

    他妈的迟钝。

  365. Vaterland 说:

    It’s very obvious what is going on: When attempting censorship, especially in a country with a first amendment, a convenient candidate to set a precedent must be found. At first it was Holocaust denial on YouTube which was expanded to all Neo-Nazi material, then all original 3rd Reich music, films and original Hitler speeches with accurate subtitles and finally anything critical of Jewish influence and power will be deleted. Just as Holocaust denial laws were used as a precedent for Anti-BDS laws. Step by step we arrived at: “Anti-Zionism is Anti-Semitism” and who ever critics the Jews is a HATER and has to be deplatformed. Locked away, if the law allows it.

    Now Covid-19 gave the opportunity to shut down those disagreeing with the MSM, government and government owned MSM. Disagreement with them is linked to disagreeing with your doctor. And in the circumstance of a pandemic, disagreeing with the health experts and spreading “fake news”, which allegedly kills people, is equated to disagreeing with “hate speech experts” and spreading “conspiracy theories”. Feeding the self-serving lie of the censors and actual oppressors and his SJW cohorts: “Your speech kills!” And it’s been a long goal to equate Holocaust denial and criticism of Jewish power with flat earth and hate. “The laws are there to protect you for your own good.”, says Big Brother with the small hat and those who serve him. And the Noahide laws warn us of their end game.

    And just like in the Soviet Union those in opposition to the state were locked away in psychiatric wards, we too are declared insane and will have to be dealt with accordingly. In these last days of the USSA.

    But are these crazy liberals or crazy leftists? They are neither. They are traitors first and foremost. It’s a Soviet like managerial class of opportunists who want to become the elite over the masses, or rather its servants. They are enemies of the people. And everything leads to Jewish power and its absolute stranglehold over the USA and the so called “West”, its vassal states, by proxy.

    • 同意: Miro23
  366. Miro23 说:

    But are these crazy liberals or crazy leftists? They are neither. They are traitors first and foremost. It’s a Soviet like managerial class of opportunists who want to become the elite over the masses…

    Agreed. There are various camouflages – liberal, leftist, free markets, free trade, free movement of capital, freedom from borders and the use of generic “freedom” in the “land of the free” .

    In fact, there is so much freedom, that it’s just like the Soviet Union. Freedom from capitalists, freedom from class oppressors, freedom from exploitation, freedom from private ownership, freedom from dissident troublemakers and freedom from what some people (previously and mistakenly) thought was freedom.

    Finally it’s all a self serving and meaningless dialectic. An elite is an elite. They are busy ring fencing their power and rooting out opposition.

    However, on the positive side, they are (as always), greatly outnumbered and risk being swamped by dissidents – particularly when they use state violence to protect their power (an inevitable end-game feature).

    Example, Nicolae and Elena Ceaușescu still explaining what wonderful caring people they were (father and mother of the Rumanian people) while they were being led out to be shot.

    • 同意: idrankwhat
  367. @Ron Unz

    I’m surprised that you haven’t high on the list of possible pressures on Facebook simple opportunism by the likes of ADL and SPLC who have been surely lying in wait for a chance to damage UR.

  368. Bob34 说:

    Congratulations. Today a news or opinion site is no damn good unless it is censored by Facebook, Twitter, or Youtube (or all three) and has lost its payment processor.

  369. ThurstonBT 说:

    I note that Facebook still bans posting links to unz.com. Is there any update on this situation?

当前评论者
说:

发表评论-对超过两周的文章发表评论,将在质量和语气上进行更严格的判断


 记得 我的信息为什么?
 电子邮件回复我的评论
$
提交的评论已被许可给 Unz评论 并可以由后者自行决定在其他地方重新发布
在翻译模式下禁用评论
通过RSS订阅此评论主题 通过RSS订阅所有Ron Unz评论