Unz评论•另类媒体选择$
美国主流媒体大都排除了有趣,重要和有争议的观点
 兰斯·韦尔顿档案馆
ET TU,瑞典民主党? 在新的黑暗时代,IQ否认主义在整个西方被制度化
通过电子邮件将此页面发送给其他人

 记住我的信息



=>

书签 全部切换总目录添加到图书馆从图书馆中删除 • B
显示评论下一个新评论下一个新回复了解更多
回复同意/不同意/等等 更多... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
同意不同意谢谢LOL轮唱
这些按钮可将您的公开协议,异议,感谢,LOL或巨魔与所选注释一起注册。 仅对最近使用“记住我的信息”复选框保存姓名和电子邮件的频繁评论者可用,并且在任何八个小时的时间内也只能使用三次。
忽略评论者 关注评论者
搜寻文字 区分大小写  确切的词  包括评论
列表 书签

“Trust the Science” was the mantra of the Left, and the chronically unable to think, 始终 练习 Covid Pandemic. However, this never meant “trust the results of systematic observation and experiment”—because you always question and refine these, meaning you can never completely “trust” them. Rather, it meant “Trust the Scientists.” And by “Scientists” it did not mean “those who engage in systematic observation and experimentation.”[科学的方法, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, June 1, 2021] It specifically meant approved members of the “guild of science,” which is now strongly controlled by Woke ideologues [How Our Universities Were Corrupted, by Matthew Goodwin, 放牧, 24年2022月XNUMX日]。

Even more narrowly, “Trust the Science” referred to members of this guild who were prepared to limit, suppress, and lie about (or, at best, unconsciously manipulate) their observations and experiments so that they that they in no way questioned the dogmas of the New Religion of Wokeness. As with U.K. 混血 celebrity scientist 亚当·卢瑟福, 他们甚至 tried to argue that the “science” literally substantiated Woke dogmas, as in his book How to Argue With a Racist.

The lie is given to the slogan “Trust the Science” when researchers are not merely Cancelled and driven into academic exile for honestly reporting the results of “systematic observation and experimentation,” but actually prosecuted by the authorities.

It is a cliché to refer to a persecuted scientist as being a modern-day 伽利略, who was forced to recant his heresy of espousing a heliocentric universe and then spend the rest of his life under house arrest as a punishment. But cliches can be true. Thus in 1989, there were 电话 to prosecute psychologist 菲利普·拉什顿(J. Philippe Rushton) in Canada for his academic research on race differences, although he was never actually prosecuted [调查一位伟大的(尽管有缺陷的)调查员, by F. Roger Devlin, Unz评论, July 26, 2018]. Similarly, in 2004 Finnish police 看着 whether political scientist 塔图·范哈宁(Tatu Vanhanen) could be prosecuted under Hate Speech laws for giving an interview about his academic research with Richard Lynn on race differences in IQ to a leading Finnish newspaper. Still, Vanhanen too was never actually prosecuted。 [Comments in interview could bring charges of inciting racism against PM Vanhanen’s father. Helsingin Sanomat. August 12, 2004]

But Finland’s super-Woke neighbour Sweden may be crossing that line. Stating Politically Incorrect but unquestionably scientific facts about race differences, although tested many times with different methods is now apparently a criminal offence.

Swedish academics who give interviews on their research to the Swedish media, or publish it in Sweden, will face legal consequences, if the country’s chief prosecutor, a rather mannish woman called My Hedström, right, has her way.

In a council meeting in Sörmland in southeast Sweden, Sweden Democrat councillor Bertil Malmberg raised the issue of race differences in IQ. Malmberg was prevented from finishing what he had to say and was “convicted of incitement against a racial group” for having said it [Dagerlind: ”Riksåklagaren vill kriminalisera all diskussion om IQ= by Mats Dagerlind, Samnytt, 24年2022月XNUMX日]。

What Malmberg actually said:

It is relevant that the population [in South Sudan] is among the peoples with the lowest intelligence in the entire world, which is well documented in research. According to the UN, the country has a very low HDI (Human Development Index), low level of education and widespread illiteracy”.

For this clearly factual statement, the elderly councillor—he is 82 years old—was given a suspended prison sentence and fined 40 days of his annual income: fines are linked to income in some of the Nordic countries [In Sweden, talking about race and intelligence will get you a fine, by Emil Kirkegaard, 语言清晰,思想清晰, 24年2022月XNUMX日]。

For the record, the IQ of South Sudan is strikingly low, even for Africa:

An unweighted national IQ for South Sudan of 59.62 with a standard deviation of 9.77 was calculated, which slightly decreased to 58.61 by weightings. School assessment results were not available for South Sudan. It must be stressed that all samples for South Sudan consisted of refugee children, with possible cognitive developmental deficit due to traumatic experiences and inadequate care.

[国家情报, by Richard Lynn and David Becker, 2018, page 145]

The cowardly 瑞典民主党人 added to Malmberg’s woes by kicking him out of the party. This is especially depressing because the Sweden Democrats, purportedly immigration patriots, just came second in Sweden’s parliamentary elections, and are expected to play a major role in the next coalition government. (In Sweden, it takes time to sort these things out).

The case will now go to Sweden’s Supreme Court, apparently at the behest of Hedstrom. According to Samnytt, her aim is “completely banning that kind of discussion [i.e. discussion of national or race differences in IQ], regardless of whether it is based on facts or not.”

In other words, “the truth is no defence” in Sweden. It won’t matter how calmly and rationally the facts are discussed. It won’t matter if they’re discussed by a politician or an academic. They will simply not be able to be discussed at all.

Perhaps Swedish academics should found a few universities that straddle the borders with their rather less Woke Nordic neighbors.

THIS IS COMING TO AN AMERICA NEAR YOU. Thus we’ve recently seen 领导 学术期刊 自然 宣布 that it will henceforth place Woke ideology ahead of science with regard to what studies it publishes—see 然而它会动, by Jukka Savolainen, 城市日报 九月9,2022。

For example, Wikipedia has been infiltrated by the extreme Left, and deletes and manipulates articles accordingly [Political deletionism at Wikipedia, 埃米尔·柯克高(Emil Kirkegaard) 语言清晰,思想清晰, 3年2022月XNUMX日]。

维基百科上的数据 is, alas, the “go to” resource for lazy, unthinking people; including scientists searching for citations in order to play the academic game and show off their knowledge of the field in their articles. But it is extremely biased, especially with regard to the subject of intelligence [Cognitive Distortions, by Shuichi Tezuka, Quillette, [18年2022月XNUMX日]。

Incredibly, this scientific suppression is clearly not widely known. Thus 查尔斯·默里—himself the 受害者 of various anti-science campaigns—tweeted “I had no idea that Wikipedia was this bad.”

Where has he ?

我们是 为首 for a new anti-science Dark Age. It can only be stopped if more and more people realise just how bad the state of science and free speech has become.

兰斯·韦尔顿[给他发电子邮件]是居住在纽约的自由职业记者的笔名。

(从重新发布 威达 经作者或代表的许可)
 
隐藏7条评论发表评论
忽略评论者...跟随Endorsed Only
修剪评论?
    []
  1. If 有人因为谈论“种族和智商”而被监禁……
    …会有 意想不到的后果: 让他成为 烈士.

    愚蠢的官僚!

  2. 按照这个速度,相机内试验将成为常态,因为这些科学家无法获得一个公共平台,在那里他们可以展示他们的观察结果; 这将摧毁许多神话和叙述。

    我同意不同种族之间的智商存在差异是不可避免的,但这些差异并不是一成不变的。 一个人的智商不能随着时间的推移保持不变,它必须波动。 智商是社会鼓励教育和对待高智商个体(通常难以共事)的一种功能,它当然会随着时间而改变。 每一代基因的混合都会改变平均智商。 如果计算公元 900 年左右人口的智商,阿拉伯人和波斯人的得分将大大高于他们现在的得分。 玛雅人的智商肯定会高于他们现在的后代。 因此,那些今天得分低的国家,如果他们改善社会和治理,明天可能会提高他们的智商。

    • 回复: @Realist
  3. 另一个 结果论者 言论自由的论据:

    If 政府 歹徒 一个组织,实际上说该组织将 不能 只是消失,而是被驱赶到地下——而且,也许,甚至会成长 因为成为“禁果”。

    史翠珊效应,宝贝!
    .
    .
    .

    Guy Madison 博士是于默奥大学的心理学教授(即:在 瑞典); 他进行“基础研究”(例如,与 Ed Dutton 博士合着 等等) – 他最好当心!

    https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Guy-Madison

  4. 拉什顿无疑是蒙昧主义迫害的受害者,但他不是天才。 他只是或多或少地向更广大的公众提供了其他人隐藏的正确人物,而且每个人都知道,即​​使是在那些否认他们的人中。 有些人甚至将他视为达尔文地位的新科学预言家。 没有。

    首先,他只是重复了无数其他人,例如艾森克(Eysenck)的观察和解释,甚至更有趣。

    第二达尔文不是一个积极的参考,他以自己的方式和卡尔马克思一样糟糕(无论如何,他钦佩达尔文对一切事物的普遍唯物主义解释),并为与马克思一样多的恶棍的职业生涯辩护,并帮助尽可能多的犹太人接管。 达尔文甚至证明了与马克思一样多的科学欺诈行为是正当的。 每一次试图将某种类型的化石作为人类与生活在遥远过去的某种类人猿或类似灵长类物种之间缺失的联系的每一次尝试,十年后都被证明是一场骗局,而且似乎无限的涌入每次打印更多的资金用于下一次。 拉什顿赞扬了“走出非洲”理论,以证明黑人实际上可能是靠近露西的某种缺失环节,因为他们错过了生活在冰川时代条件下的机会,从而演变成高加索人或蒙古人种。

    第三拉什顿已被证明是一个保守派,而不是保守派:他只奉承犹太人是所有已知种族中平均智商最高的拥有者,并称赞他们是其他白人应该屈服和效仿的理想白人。 他从未提到犹太人是他们在该特定知识领域公然存在的主要问题。 他只指责顽固地坚持人类团结理想的白人(包括犹太人)的过度人文主义。 他(或者更确切地说,他的虔诚和不加批判的学生)从来没有想过,正在发生的事情是一个将最重要的科学私有化和秘密化的过程,在一个宏伟的愚蠢计划中,掌握在恶毒的精英手中。

    拉什顿不是天才,他也驳斥了许多不能证实他的偏见的数据,这些数据正是英国寡头大约两代前的偏见,当时犹太人仍然需要亲白人的盎格鲁撒克逊种族主义为他们的殖民事业招募无情的仆人,这会看不起地球上的所有其他文化,但永远不会抬头。 特别是拉什顿没有提到,直到肯尼迪时代,爱尔兰人民,无论是在爱尔兰还是在国外,特别是在美国和他们受雇的英国殖民地,得分都与美国黑人一样差,有时甚至更差(大约 - 20%),收养研究似乎证实,爱尔兰天主教天生自卑的原因是遗传而不是环境:营养充足的美国稻田得分与他们营养不良的兄弟仍然在他们的英国占领的岛屿上一样糟糕。 突然之间,在 1960 年代,大约没有一代人(就在那个时候,爱尔兰语最终因所有实际目的而被废弃,而在第七届理事会之后的天主教已经演变成另一种英国国教,导致绝对爱尔兰人与普通白人盎格鲁没有什么区别),智商差距在大西洋两岸完全缩小。 即使发生了一场灾难:一种远为优越的文化在一个更为平庸和野蛮的人手中最终灭绝。

    不能单独解释这一事实会导致拉什顿不是天才。 当然,拉什顿是一位典型的英国种族主义者,按照家庭传统,他对被他视为征服凯尔特人的人怀有特殊的怨恨(一个大错误:正如基因研究表明的那样,大多数盎格鲁-撒克逊人抵达早期英格兰时,都是由少数当地人授权的贫困劳工移民。寡头定居几乎与大多数通过埃利斯岛定居美国的白人移民一样,这些寡头王国在种族上是凯尔特人,尽管他们在语言上转换为英语,因为这些寡头明显愿意用另一种文化取代凯尔特文化一种更类似于他们的野心,因为它有利于不那么以荣誉为中心和更多的无产阶级美德:但是对于大部分人来说,基因仍然是凯尔特式的,没有集中在较低的水平上)。

    拉什顿(Rushton)购买了“走出非洲”的理论:没有原创观点,而是拼命讨好犹太学术权威,他们希望将人类本质上归结为一个本质上的黑人实体,但犹太人除外,他们独自朝着正确的方向进化或也许来自外太空。 来自非洲的理论已经被证明与最近的数据不一致:似乎人类化同时发生在地球上的许多地方,而黑人种族在非洲本土出现的时间相当新:他们首先出现在地中海,然后当他们撤退时入侵了非洲大陆的大部分地区,进而取代了更多看起来像亚洲的原始人。 可能黑人种族,即使是绝对的判断总是任意的,也可能是一种从以前更完美的状态下放的现象,部分原因是与一些已灭绝的直立人物种混合在一起。 拉什顿和其他人的另一个重大错误是将非洲视为地球上一个相当天堂般的部分,太缺乏进化挑战,迫使人们提前思考,就像在遭受严冬和冰川作用的地区所发生的那样。 事实恰恰相反:几乎所有非洲气候的生长季节都比不那么炎热的气候更短,而且生长季节也更难保证。 在发现某些现代药物之前,非洲对大多数白人航海者来说是致命的,而相反的情况并非如此:它是地球上最难生存的地方之一,需要更多的规划、群体团结和弹性,导致技术更少(技术需求休闲),但与其他地方一样精致的威权王国。 炎热和干旱对人体的考验比寒冷和冰冻要难得多。

    非洲人平均较低的智商是他们所服从的政治制度的结果,这种制度对任何一种明智的判断都进行了更严厉的惩罚,并通过群体思维采取了更多的大众思想控制技术。 它是由他们的精英们故意组织的,或者可能是由外部的前精英们故意组织的,使这些民族像牛群一样繁殖。

    • 回复: @RoatanBill
    , @Peter Lund
  5. RoatanBill 说:
    @Francis Miville

    写得很好的评论。 您必须承认,形成您的结论是您的意见基于缺乏证据的。 我特别喜欢这个断言: 炎热和干旱对人体的考验比寒冷和冰冻要难得多。 当没有保护的人都害怕两者时。

    试图将智商调查变成一门科学是不可能的。 选择的方法可能会扭曲结果。 可以做的是人们每天都在做的事情,他们评估个人,然后出现一种模式,导致像个人一样的刻板印象。 通过经验,我们接触过美国黑人的人都知道他们的癖好。 作为一个群体,他们智力低下,暴力冲动高,易怒。 他们寻找机会被冒犯,这样他们就可以采取行动。

    其他群体也同样因经验而被定型。 犹太人、吉普赛人、爱尔兰人、波兰人、德国人等都有刻板的行为,这不是虚构的。 当个人被刻板印象而没有考虑到他的独特性时,问题就出现了。

    断言非洲人智商较低是其政治制度的结果是难以接受的。 更有可能的是,它们是属于猎人聚集社会的心理原语,而不是工业社会。

  6. Realist 说:
    @Old Brown Fool

    智商不是教育的功能……它是基因的功能。 你不能通过教育提高智商,但你可以提高知识和运用智力的能力。

    • 同意: Peter Lund
  7. Peter Lund 说:
    @Francis Miville

    聪明的此在自己已经说不下去了。 他也大错特错:

    非洲人的平均智商较低是他们受制于政治制度的结果

    • 同意: Realist
当前评论者
说:

发表评论-对超过两周的文章发表评论,将在质量和语气上进行更严格的判断


 记得 我的信息为什么?
 电子邮件回复我的评论
$
提交的评论已被许可给 Unz评论 并可以由后者自行决定在其他地方重新发布
在翻译模式下禁用评论
通过RSS订阅此评论主题 通过RSS订阅所有Lance Welton的评论