Unz评论•另类媒体选择$
美国主流媒体大都排除了有趣,重要和有争议的观点
 LaurentGuyénot档案
以色列作为一个人:犹太权力理论
通过电子邮件将此页面发送给其他人

 记住我的信息



=>

书签 全部切换总目录添加到图书馆从图书馆中删除 • B
显示评论下一个新评论下一个新回复了解更多
回复同意/不同意/等等 更多... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
同意不同意谢谢LOL轮唱
这些按钮可将您的公开协议,异议,感谢,LOL或巨魔与所选注释一起注册。 仅对最近使用“记住我的信息”复选框保存姓名和电子邮件的频繁评论者可用,并且在任何八个小时的时间内也只能使用三次。
忽略评论者 关注评论者
搜寻文字 区分大小写  确切的词  包括评论

“犹太人种族的一个突出特征是它的坚持不懈。 它不能达到这一代,它将达到下一代。 今天打败它,它不会继续被打败。 它的征服者死了,但是犹太人继续前进,永远不会忘记,永远不会偏离其以一种或另一种形式进行世界控制的古老目标。”[1]亨利·福特, 国际犹太人 (在archive.org上), 卷2,小伙子。 23年13月1920日第XNUMX号,引自凯文·麦克唐纳(Kevin MacDonald), 文化起义:关于西方文明,犹太影响和反犹太主义的论文, 西方出版社,2007年,第240页。 XNUMX。

所以写道 亨利·福特(Henry Ford) 国际犹太人. 确实,没有其他人能够持之以恒地坚持不懈地追求目标,这一目标已历经几代人的步伐—如果我们将犹太复国主义计划追溯到巴比伦流亡时期,则是一百代人。 犹太人经常发现自己在关键问题上存在分歧,并参与了完全对立的运动。 最终,甚至他们的对抗似乎也协同地促进了他们共同的更高目标。 可以发现许多插图,显示出犹太精英阶层像鱼群一样分裂然后重新团聚的非凡能力。

希伯来圣经是唯物主义的吗?

美国拉比哈里·沃顿(Harry Waton)有一个理论来解释犹太人的有机统一,毅力和进步。 他在他的书中写道 犹太人计划, 1939年发表的文章:“实际上,希伯来宗教是强烈的唯物主义,而正是这一点赋予了它持久和有效的现实。”

耶和华不同于其他所有神灵。 所有其他神都住在天堂。 因此,所有其他宗教都关心天堂,他们承诺死后天堂会给予一切回报。 因此,所有其他宗教否定了地球和物质世界,对人类在地球上的福祉和进步无动于衷。 但是耶和华从天上降下来,居住在这个地球上,并在人类中体现自己。 因此,犹太教只关心地球,并承诺地球上的所有人都会得到回报。”

“对犹太教有更深了解的犹太人知道,犹太人唯一的不朽之举就是犹太人民的不朽之情。 每个犹太人继续生活在犹太人民中,只要犹太人民生活,他就将继续生活。”

沃顿解释说,这是基于希伯来语塔纳赫语:

“圣经说的是地球上的永生。 这种不朽由什么构成? 它包含以下内容:灵魂继续通过子孙,子孙后代的人民生活和运转。 因此,当一个人去世时,他的灵魂就聚集在他的人民身上。 亚伯拉罕,以撒,雅各布,摩西和所有其他人继续生活在犹太人民中,并且在适当的时候他们将生活在整个人类中。 这是犹太人民的永生,犹太人一直都知道。”[2]哈里·沃顿, 犹太人与人类计划。 对所有反犹太人的回答, 1939(archive.org),第52、125、132页。

几乎可以说犹太人只有一个集体不朽的灵魂。 重要的是,以色列是唯一拥有一个人的名字的国家(创世记32:29给雅各布起了以色列的名字)。

沃顿对圣经人类学的理解正确吗? 而且它对解释犹太人的权力有多大作用? 第一个问题的答案是肯定的。 沃顿的观点是从他当时的最佳学术成就中得出的,此后一直没有矛盾。 受过教育的犹太人过去和现在一直在广泛使用它。 在他的最后一本书中, 摩西和一神教, 同样在1939年出版的西格蒙德·弗洛伊德(Sigmund Freud)正确地强调,在个人永生性问题上,埃及人和以色列人处于光谱的另一端:

“没有比埃及人更古老的人否认死亡,也没有为死后的生命做出如此精心的准备……。” 另一方面,早期的犹太宗教完全放弃了长生不老的历史。 在任何地方都从未提到过死后存在的可能性。”[3]西格蒙德·弗洛伊德, 摩西和一神教, Hogarth Press,1939年(archive.org),第33-34页。

在律法书中没有来世的期望。 相反,它有一个隐含的否认:“通过汗流earn背,您将获得食物,直到您从地面上被带回地面为止。 耶和华向亚当说(创世记3:19)。[4]像往常一样,我引用天主教徒的圣经 新耶路撒冷圣经 , 并没有像其他英文翻译那样出于令人讨厌的原因将神的名字YHWH更改为“ The Lord”。 这是“耶和华上帝塑造人[亚当从地面的土壤亚当并吹起生命的气息[ruah进入他的鼻孔,而人成为了活物侄子]”(2:7)。 之间的接近 男人, “男人”,以及 亚当 “地球”或“地面”强化了这一想法。 有人说,尤其是阴谋家, 侄子ruah 有两个词用来表示不朽的精神。 这是源自希腊语Septuagint翻译的一种误解:希伯来语 侄子 被翻译成 精神。 但实际上,它指的是动物或人类的“生命体”。 在利未记17的礼节中,它有时仅表示“生命”并与血液相关。希伯来语这个词 ruah,翻译为 元气,表示“呼吸”,也表示生命。 这些术语在希伯来语圣经中没有任何地方暗示任何形式的个人来世。

不应将这种圣经的反精神主义解释为证明希伯来圣经伟大的上古时代的“原始”特征,好像对死者异世界的信仰是宗教思想史上的较晚发展。 相反,希伯来人对来世的否定与外国邪教的排斥有关,这普遍涉及对来世的关注。 人类学唯物论最明确的《创世记》背叛了美索不达米亚和波斯的影响,而这些影响是巴比伦流放者之前无法实现的。 重要的是,它使用波斯语 游行 指定(伊甸园的)“花园”,但将其含义颠倒过来:在印欧神话中,天堂是幸福的世界,义人的死因从生命树上的进食而成为不朽的东西,在创世纪中,它是一个过去对全人类来说是永远的迷失,而戏剧的舞台把死亡和劳动的双重祸害带入了世界。 因为死亡没有希望,也没有精神上的回报。

这是我在书中提到的一个例子 从耶和华到锡安:当以赛亚书38章中的好王希西家“生病了,快要死了”时,他表示不希望与造物主会面或在异世界中开始新的生活。 相反,他对不再见耶和华的前景感到绝望。 因为他告诉他:“阴间不能赞美你,死亡也不能赞美你。 那些下陷坑的人不再希望自己保持不变”(以赛亚书38:11-19)。 Sheol仅仅是“坑”,这是另一个常见的误解,源于其翻译为 阎王 在Septuagint中,将其视为死者生活的世界。 阴间没有生命,它是死亡的纯粹消极概念,尽可能接近虚无的概念。 这个词在五经堂中只出现过五次:在《创世纪》中是死的常规名称中的四倍,[5]创世记37:35; 42:38; 44:29; 44:31。 在数字16中,有一个关于叛逆的犹太人的故事,这些犹太人受到神的惩罚,突然被所有财产吞没在地球上。

为了回应他的祈祷,希西家只获得了额外的十五年尘世生活。 耶和华对忠心的人没有其他奖赏,只有地球上漫长而富饶的生活。 像希西家一样,约伯期望他的持久信念不会给他来世安慰,而是让他在地球上延续140年,拥有众多后代,还有“ 42万只绵羊,12头骆驼,一千只牛和一千只母驴。 ”(约伯记88:6)。 在任何其他文化中,幸福的来世都会奖励他对上帝的忠诚。 但是耶和华不关心死者,他“不再记住”死者(诗篇XNUMX:XNUMX)。

立即订购

实际上,如果我们将上帝定义为超越这个世界存在的话,耶和华就几乎不能被视为“上帝”。 耶和华宣称自己独自统治这个世界,因为从字面上看,他是国王(Melech, 希伯来语圣经对他的称号超过了五十次)。 耶和华确实是一位非常特殊的国王:无形,无所不知和永恒—对以他的名字讲话的祭司和先知的世袭家族非常实用。

犹太人是集体灵魂

在某种意义上,“唯物宗教”听起来像是一个矛盾。 的确,如大多数人今天所理解的那样,“宗教”的概念是否适用于圣经中的犹太教教义是值得怀疑的。 犹太教在近两千年的演变是另一个故事。 在希腊化时期,希腊-埃及二元主义渗透了犹太思想。 公元前一世纪用希腊语写在亚历山大大帝的所罗门智慧断言:“上帝创造了不朽的人类”,并批评了那些“不相信无罪灵魂的报偿”的人(2:22-23) )。 但是这些书从未成为犹太教的典范,因为犹太教犹太教徒大力拒绝任何希腊文。 而且,即使在希腊化的犹太教内部,唯物主义的观点仍然盛行。 根据传道书,

“人类的命运和动物的命运是一样的:一个人死了,另一个人死了; […]万物都来自尘土,万物又回到尘土中”(3:19-20)。

“活人至少知道他们将要死,但死者一无所知。 […]在你要去的Sheol中,既没有成就,也没有计划,也没有科学,也没有智慧”(9:5-10)。

值得注意的是,希腊化犹太教最持久的遗产是身体“复活”的观念,这是对希腊死后生命的隐喻的实质性实质性改编, 吻合 (“起来”)。 在这个犹太世界末日的幻想中,不需要永生的灵魂。 因此,即使圣经中的复活概念也表明,唯物主义是犹太教本质的一部分。

最近,在与希腊文化背景相当的情况下,改革犹太教将不朽的灵魂重新注入了犹太人类学。 但是,重要的是,当十八世纪哈斯卡拉的父亲摩西·门德尔松(Moses Mendelssohn,1729-1786年)决定说服他的犹太人接受个人灵魂永生的信条时,这是提升人类地位的必要条件根据他的说法,他没有依靠犹太传统,而是进行了题为柏拉图式的对话,标题为 Phaedo或灵魂的不朽.

许多犹太知识分子抗议将异物引入犹太思想,他们的反应将成为犹太复国主义的中心宗旨。 根据摩西·赫斯(罗马和耶路撒冷:最后一个民族问题, 1862年,“对犹太教精神来说,没有什么比拯救个人的想法更重要的了,按照现代的观念,拯救个人的思想是宗教的基石。” 对于赫斯来说,犹太教的本质是“对人类历史上精神的连续性的生动信仰”,因为“犹太人不仅仅是一个宗教的追随者,也就是说,他们是一个种族兄弟会,一个民族。 ”[6]摩西·赫斯(Moses Hess) 罗马和耶路撒冷:犹太民族主义研究,1918(archive.org),第48、64-65、71、98页。

同样,根据犹太复国主义者的历史学家本西特·内塔尼亚胡(Zeev Jabotinsky的前任秘书,现任以色列总理的父亲)的说法,犹太人将犹太定义为宗教而非国籍,“这是自欺欺人的结果”。 他捍卫了一种种族观念,相当于认为犹太人作为一个民族才是不朽的:

“只有通婚,一个人才能使自己脱离一个国家,然后就其后代而言。 他的个性是他的国家素质的典范和体现,然后可能在后代失去,而以其他国家的素质为主导。 因此,即使从生物学的角度来看,退出一个国家也是自杀行为。”[7]内塔尼亚胡(Benzan Netanyahu), 犹太复国主义的奠基人 (1938), 巴尔弗书籍(Balfour Books),2012年 , 点燃版,157-66和2203-7。

内塔尼亚胡说得对:他对犹太的概念是唯一与圣经一致的概念。 犹太有影响力的记者卢西安·沃尔夫(Lucien Wolf)通过宣称“在犹太教中,宗教和种族几乎是可以互换的”来试图做到这两种方式,这在普遍接受的宗教概念中当然是没有道理的。[8]Lucien Wolf,“什么是犹太教? 今天的问题,” 每两周评论 XXXVI,(1884),第237-256页,http://www.manchesterjewishstudies.org/wolf/ 宗教欢迎convert依者,但不欢迎以色列的“宗教”。 也有例外:一方面是大规模的强迫conversion依,另一方面是个别的女son,他们为基因库或财务库带来了增值,但圣经中没有记载。

您可能会问,包皮环切术怎么样? 这不是入犹太社区的仪式吗? 不在圣经中。 作为耶和华对亚伯拉罕施加的“立约的标志”,对于“你和你的后代,世代相传”(创世记17:9),包皮环切实际上增强了犹太人严格的遗传性甚至生殖器性。 作为父子之间传递的“肉体印记”,它完美地象征着耶和华的无精神本质。

在圣经中,一神论和种族纯洁之间有严格的平等:耶和华禁止犹太人将自己的子女嫁给非犹太人 因为 “你的儿子会被引诱跟随我去服务其他神灵”(申命记7:3-4)。 当一些以色列人在摩押人(亚伯拉罕的一个民族)中娶妻时,耶和华使这些妇女“邀请他们献祭他们的神,而人民在他们的神面前吃了饭并鞠躬了”(民数记25:1-2) 。 从像凯文·麦克唐纳(Kevin MacDonald)这样的进化心理学家的角度来看,嫉妒神的独家崇拜只是基于严格内婚制的优生计划的宗教借口,而犹太教从根本上说是“人们之间的群体进化策略”。[9]凯文·麦克唐纳(Kevin MacDonald), 一个人一个人住:犹太教作为集体进化的策略, 普拉格(Praeger),1994年。

通过剥夺犹太人的灵魂,代之以犹太人的种族身份,《摩西五经》使以色列成为最全面的民族。 被否定了个人的不朽,将全部重新投资于整个人民(“我建立了一个永恒的人民”,以赛亚书44:7),就好像犹太人被一个单一的,民族的,遗传的灵魂团结在一起,被耶和华所化身。 艾萨克·卡德米·科恩(Isaac Kadmi-Cohen)在《犹太灵魂随笔》(1929年)中实际上将犹太教描述为“使种族神化的灵性化”,因此“犹太教的神性包含在以种族为代表的实体的崇高中。”[10]艾萨克·卡德米·科恩(Isaac Kadmi-Cohen), Nomades: Essai sur l'âme juive, 菲利克斯·阿尔坎(Felix Alcan),1929年(archive.org),第98页,第143页。 以色列拥有独特的命运,每个犹太人都为这一命运做出贡献。 犹太辩护律师莫里斯·塞缪尔(Maurice Samuel)写道 你外邦人 (1924):“犹太人的感觉,即使像我这样自由思考的犹太人,也感觉到与他的人民合一,从而被赋予享受无限的力量。”[11]莫里斯·塞缪尔(Maurice Samuel), 你们这些外邦人 纽约,1924年(archive.org),第74-75页。 德国犹太复国主义者阿尔弗雷德·诺西格(Alfred Nossig)在1922年写道:“犹太人社区不仅仅是现代政治意义上的一个民族。 […]它形成了我们存在的潜意识核心,这是我们灵魂的共同物质。”[12]阿尔弗雷德·诺西格(Alfred Nossig) 整合Judentum, 1922年,第1-5页(在www.deutsche-digitale-bibliothek.de/item/DXCTNNZZ3INPTI2S3MYPGLQOFR3XSW22上)

从宗教的角度来看,圣经人类学似乎缺少个体永生。 但是,取代集体永生的概念是犹太人民最大力量的源泉。 一个人只有几十年才能完成自己的命运,而一个国家则有数百年甚至几千年的历史。 耶利米可以使流放巴比伦的人放心,他们将在七代之内返回耶路撒冷(巴鲁克书6:2中的“耶利米书”)。 一个民族的七代人与一个人的七年生活没有什么不同。 当Goy等待一个世纪的时间时,被选中的人们会看到更多。 犹太人灵魂的民族取向向任何集体项目注入了一种精神力量和耐力,其他民族无法与之抗衡。

立即订购

以色列的运作方式与其他国家完全不同。 它通过一个全景影像来定义自己,该全景影像扫描了几千年来的过去和未来。 它为3000年前的开始保留了生动的记忆,并期待着命运的终结。 如果其内存不是准确的历史记录,则没有任何区别。 正如Yosef Hayim Yerushalmi指出的那样 扎科尔:犹太历史和犹太记忆,“只有在以色列,在所有地方都没有要记住的禁令,这是全体人民的宗教迫切需要。”[13]Yosef Hayim Yerushalmi, 扎科尔:犹太历史和犹太记忆 (1982), 华盛顿大学出版社,2011年。 这个特征无疑是从其游牧的过去继承而来的,因为游牧民族比久坐的人更坚定地致力于集体记忆和家谱,久坐的人也植根于土地(土地保留着他们的记忆)。 记忆是个性,以色列的非凡记忆使它成为非凡个性的个性。

植根于圣经对个人不朽的否认的“民族灵魂”范式与圣经矩阵的另一个基本方面“选择的人民”范式相结合。 因为如果犹太人的灵魂在某种程度上可以被耶和华识别,并且如果耶和华是上帝,那么犹太人的灵魂就是上帝。 圣经唯物主义和圣经民族中心主义(或伪普遍主义)的这种结合是一个简单的方程,E = mC2 解释了“犹太人的思想”(至少比拉斐尔·帕塔伊(Raphael Patai)的同名书更好)[14]拉斐尔·帕泰(Raphael Patai), 犹太人的心, 韦恩州立大学出版社 , 1977年(在books.google.fr上)。.

寄生国

扎根于圣经唯物主义的整体原则不足以解释犹太人对世界统治的不懈努力。 在某种程度上,直到最近,每个国家都是有机的。 “民族”一词来自拉丁语,意为“出生”或“种族”:当人们生活在同一个“祖国”中时,该民族就存在(拉帕特里, (法语))感到“熟悉”,彼此认识为兄弟,分享共同的祖先。 要了解犹太民族有多特别,我们需要更精确地定义其有机特征。 亨利·福特有一个建议:

“美国的犹太人问题本质上是一个城市问题。 犹太人的特征是聚集人数,不是聚集土地或发现原材料的地方,而是人数最多的地方。 与犹太人声称外邦人排斥他们的说法一起考虑时,这是一个值得注意的事实。 犹太人聚集在那些地方和他们抱怨他们最不想要的人中的人数最多。 最经常给出的解释是: 犹太人的天才是要以人为生。 不是土地,也不是原材料的生产,而是人。 让别人耕种土壤; 犹太人,如果可以的话,将靠分till为生。 让其他人在贸易和制造业中劳作; 犹太人将利用他们的工作成果。 那是他奇特的天才。 如果这个天才被描述为寄生的,那么这个词似乎有一定的适合性。”[15]亨利·福特, 国际犹太人 卷2,小伙子。 23 上。 CIT。

这个民族天才植根于圣经。 耶和华注定以色列不仅是像其他国家那样的生物,而且是寄生生物。 从摩西时代起,耶和华就发誓要给他的人民一个“没有建起的伟大而繁荣的城市,没有你提供过的美好事物的房屋,没有挖过的水井,还有葡萄园和橄榄树的国家”还没有栽种”(申命记6:10-11)。 先知鼓励以色列的寄生命运:“你要吸吮列国的奶,你要吸取列王的财富”(以赛亚书60:16); “陌生人会挺身而出,喂饱你的羊群,外国人将成为你的耕ough者和葡萄种植者; 但您将被称为“耶和华的祭司”,并被称为“我们神的部长”。 你必以民族的财富为食,以他们的荣耀代替他们”(以赛亚书61:5-6); “周围所有国家的财富都将聚集在一起:黄金,白银,衣服,数量巨大”(撒迦利亚书14:14)。 耶和华·萨瓦斯说:“我将动摇万国,万国的财宝将流入,我将为这座圣殿充满荣耀。 我的是银,我的是金! 耶和华·沙伯(Yahweh Sabaoth)宣称。 (哈该书2:7-8)

高利贷是典型的寄生虫,据我所知,Yahwist牧师是第一个通过债务奴役整个民族的人。没有任何; 你们将统治许多国家,而不受任何国家统治”(申命记15:6)。

原型寄生英雄是雅各之子约瑟夫。 从奴隶的地位上升为法老的总理之后,他偏爱他的亲戚,并为他们获得“埃及最好的地区的土地所有权”。 他负责管理国家粮食储备,在丰年期间存储大量粮食; 然后,当饥荒爆发时,他为垄断的谷物谈判了高价,因此“积累了在埃及和迦南所能找到的所有钱。” 次年,由于造成了资金短缺,他迫使农民放弃牧群以换取谷物:“交出您的牲畜,如果您的钱用完了,我将给您分发食物以换取您的牲畜。” 一年后,“除了我们的身体和土地,农民”一无所有,于是沦为乞讨,为了生存而不得不卖掉自己:“以我们和我们的土地来换取食物,我们与我们一起土地将成为法老的农奴; 只给我们种子,这样我们才能生存而不会死,土地也不会回到沙漠!” 因此,希伯来人定居埃及后,“在那获得了财产。 他们是富有成果的,并且成长了无数”(创世记47:11-27),这是上帝祝福的确凿标志。 劳伦斯·威尔斯(Lawrence Wills)撰写了几本约瑟夫(Joseph)类型的犹太传说,他写道:“尽管现代读者难以接受,但实际上,摆在我们面前的是关于税农的英雄传说,就好像我们在阅读罗宾汉的传说一样。从诺丁汉治安官的角度讲。”[16]劳伦斯·威尔斯 外国国王朝廷中的犹太人:古代犹太朝廷的传说,康奈尔大学出版社,1995年,第189页。 XNUMX。 拥有这样一本圣书的人在争夺财富的控制中具有巨大的优势。

自19年初以来th 在一个世纪的拿破仑战争中,以色列的寄生主义在巨大的政治规模上的战争暴利中得到了证明,每一次欧洲大规模屠杀都是犹太复国主义世界秩序的垫脚石。 最近,这种传统达到了对美国帝国主义政策的完全控制,正如格雷格·费尔顿(Greg Felton)等人在文件中所记载的那样。 宿主和寄生虫.[17]格雷格·费尔顿, 寄主和寄生虫:以色列的第五专栏如何消耗美国, 坏熊出版社,2012年。

帝国的寄生化是从圣经,特别是从以斯拉记和尼希米记中吸取的另一个教训。 当时,帝国力量是波斯。 在波斯人于公元前539年征服巴比伦之后,犹太人在犹太流放者的帮助下获得了在新帝国政府中的影响力地位,并利用他们在巴勒斯坦建立了神权专制。 约有42,360人及其7,337名仆人和200名男女歌手(根据以斯拉记2:64-67)返回耶路撒冷之后,

“永恒主激发了波斯国王居鲁士的精神,发布了一个宣言,并在整个王国中公开展示。'波斯国王居鲁斯说,永恒主,天上的上帝,赐给了我地球上所有的王国,任命我在犹大的耶路撒冷为他建造一座殿。”(以斯拉记1:1-2)。

雅各以赛亚补充说,“唤醒赛勒斯的精神”所需要的压力没有详细说明,他“已经被他的右手抓住了”,并告知:

“为了我的仆人雅各和我所选择的以色列,我以你的名字呼唤你,尽管你不认识我,但给了你一个头衔。 […]虽然你不认识我,但我已经武装了你。” 以赛亚书45:1-5)

阴谋网络

让我们不要被我们的有机隐喻所迷惑。 犹太精英们在实现其国家目标方面的成功并不仅仅由某些自发的民族本能或团体灵魂来解释,尽管他们有表面上的分歧,但他们无意识地将他们深深地绑在了一起。 正如吉拉德·阿特兹蒙(Gilad Atzmon)强调的那样,现代犹太复国主义的力量确实建立在犹太人之间的有机而非等级上的联系上:整个系统。”[18]吉拉德·阿兹蒙(Gilad Atzmon), 流浪的谁? 犹太人身份政治研究, 《零书》,2011年,第21页。 XNUMX 然而,正如Atzmon所强调的那样,这种有机统一是由非常了解自己可以从中汲取力量的认知精英创造,培育和使用的。

立即订购

换句话说,以色列不仅与血液有关,而且与盟约有关。 宗教犹太人认为,犹太文化可以追溯到上帝与他真正关心的唯一人们之间的马赛克盟约。 但是,大多数犹太知识分子,文化,金融,政治或犯罪精英(例如,B'nai B'rith成员(“盟约之子”)或以色列大学联盟)都认为这是犹太人之间的盟约他们自己。

实际上,犹太运动推动历史发展的神秘能力是建立在经过2500年完善的网络实践基础上的。 种族网络意味着,外邦人不为人所知的是,犹太精英在特定问题上进行协调,以施加不可抗拒的压力,直到获得理想的效果为止。 它在各个领域中进行,并且出于各种各样的目的(包括在学术领域中)进行,以建立人为的共识。 布伦顿·桑德森(Brenton Sanderson)安德鲁·乔伊斯,[19]安德鲁·乔伊斯(Andrew Joyce),“弥赛亚的帕里亚(Pariah to Messiah):巴鲁克·斯宾诺莎(Baruch Spinoza)的工程化神化”,第1至第3部分, 西方观察家 月5 2019。 都在凯文·麦克唐纳(Kevin MacDonald's)上写作 西方观察员,已经出色地证明了几十年来犹太学者的共同努力如何将古斯塔夫·马勒(Gustav Mahler)或巴鲁·斯宾诺莎(Baruch Spinoza)之类的未成年人变成了“犹太天才”的化身:

“首先,将犹太人物的知识或艺术成就的重要性夸大到它被认为具有'改变世界'的程度。 其次,强调该人物的犹太血统和血统,以使他的“改变世界”成就成为其犹太血统和身份的自然体现。”[20]布伦登·桑德森(Brendon Sanderson),“为什么要马勒(Mahler)? 诺曼·勒布雷希特(Norman Lebrecht)和犹太天才的建构,” 西方观察者 四月13 2011。

该过程完美地说明了犹太人的“民族灵魂”方面与其在网络中的实际应用之间的联系:对于坚定的犹太人而言,每个犹太人的成就都是犹太人的成就,并且是犹太人灵魂的特定体现。

在深厚的政治权力的黑暗领域,精英犹太人团结起来,在阴谋论圈子中将历史引向理想的方向。 其中之一是帕鲁希姆教令,由 莎拉·施密特(Sarah Schmidt)耶路撒冷希伯来大学的犹太历史教授说:“一支秘密的地下游击队决心以一种安静,匿名的方式影响事件的进程。” 在启动仪式上,每个新成员都收到了指示:

“在实现我们的目标之前,您将成为兄弟般的兄弟姐妹,您将比生活中任何其他人都拥有更大的纽带-比家庭,学校和国家的纽带更亲切。 进入这种兄弟情谊,您便成为锡安军队中的一名自力更生的士兵。”

这位同修发誓说:

“在本理事会会议之前,我谨奉我所拥有的一切神圣而神圣的名义,向自己发誓要献出自己的生命,财产和对恢复犹太民族的光荣。 […]我全心全意地捍卫和服从并保守团契的法律和工作,团契的存在和宗旨。 阿们。”[21]莎拉·施密特(Sarah Schmidt),“'Parushim':美国犹太复国主义者历史上的一个秘密情节”, 美国犹太历史季刊 65,不。 2年1975月121日,第139–XNUMX页,在ifamericansknew.org/history/parushim.html上。

伍德罗·威尔逊(Woodrow Wilson)在最高法院任命路易斯·布兰代斯(Louis Brandeis,1856–1941),以及他的门徒和继承人费利克斯·法兰克福(Felix Frankfurter)(1882-1965),是这个秘密圈子的成员。 布鲁斯·艾伦·墨菲(Bruce Allen Murphy)写道:“经过25年的合作,他们将门徒网络置于影响力的位置,并为制定所需的方案而勤奋工作。” 布兰代斯/法兰克福连接。[22]布鲁斯·艾伦·墨菲(Bruce Allen Murphy), 布兰代斯/法兰克福的关系:两位最高法院大法官的秘密政治活动,牛津大学出版社,1982年,第10页。 XNUMX。 布兰代斯的导师塞缪尔·温特米尔(Samuel Untermeyer)(1858-1940),据传曾勒索威尔逊以命名布兰代斯,并且对白宫施加了无与伦比的影响,直到他去世,他很可能是Parushim的创始成员。

列奥·施特劳斯亲密的门徒们,是大师的“深奥”教学的接受者,构成了另一个阴谋论圈子。 施特劳斯对马基雅维利的理解最能说明他们的哲学。 在他的 关于马基雅维利的想法。 施特劳斯将马基雅维里(Machiavelli)定义为最高学历的爱国者,因为他知道只有国家才能永生,而最好的领导人就是那些不惧怕个人灵魂的人,因为他们没有人。 真正的爱国者对他为国家所做的事情没有道义上的限制。[23]里奥·史特劳斯 关于马基雅维里的想法, 芝加哥大学出版社,1978年,第42页。 XNUMX。 在一篇文章中 犹太世界评论 7年1999月XNUMX日,施特劳斯的门徒迈克尔·莱迪恩(Michael Ledeen) 犹太国家安全事务研究所 (金沙), 假设马基雅维利一定是“秘密犹太人”, 因为“如果您听他的政治哲学,您将听到犹太音乐。”[24]迈克尔·雷丁(Michael Ledeen),“从摩西那里学到了什么马基雅维利(一个秘密的犹太人?)” 犹太世界评论, 7年1999月0699日,在www.jewishworldreview.com/1/machiavelliXNUMX.asp上。

施特劳斯主义者构成了新保守主义者的原始核心。 这个由不到一百人组成的网络已经两代人渗透到美国国家的神经中枢,目的是抓住其外交和军事政策的杠杆作用。 新保守派的跨代可持续性说明了犹太人网络的有机背景:欧文·克里斯托(Erving Kristol)由他的儿子威廉(William),唐纳德·卡根(Donald Kagan)由其儿子罗伯特(Robert),理查德·皮派斯(Richard Pipes)由其儿子丹尼尔(Daniel)和诺曼·波德洛兹(Norman Podhoretz)由其儿子约翰和其女son继承埃利奥特·艾布拉姆斯(Elliott Abrams)。

这种聪明的,部落的,马基雅维利派的,阴谋的犹太人网络是全球犹太人非凡团结的关键。 我们可以将犹太人社区的结构与万有引力场中的同心轨道圈进行比较,以耶威的思想和预言为核心:在内部圈中,是少数群体,犹太人和以色列是他们永远关注的精英; 在外圈的是“软”犹太人,他们只有靠低重力才能保持在轨道上,并且很可能会脱离。 他们是被充分吸收的犹太人,在公共关系中发挥着重要作用,在需要时,他们中的大多数人仍然可以在反犹太主义斗争的旗帜下集会。[25]丹尼尔·埃拉扎尔(Daniel Elazar), 社区与政体:美国犹太人的组织动力,1976年,引用于凯文·麦克唐纳(Kevin MacDonald), 分离及其不满:走向反犹太主义的进化理论, 普拉格(Praeger),1998年,点燃2013年,点燃(k。 6668–91。

因此,犹太人也是犹太精英对犹太群众的思想控制系统。 在欧洲社会中,极端情况往往被边缘化,凯文·麦克唐纳(Kevin MacDonald)指出,在犹太社区中,情况恰恰相反:

“在所有转折点上,决定犹太人社区发展方向并最终赢得胜利的都是以种族为中心的因素(有人可能将它们称为激进分子)。 […]激进运动开始于犹太社区中较为坚定的群体,然后扩散并最终成为犹太社区的主流。 […]犹太人无法跟上现在的主流立场,被赶出社区,被贴上“自恨犹太人”的标签,甚至更糟,沦为阳imp。[26]凯文·麦克唐纳(Kevin MacDonald), 文化起义,同上。 cit。, 第 90-91。

自从巴比伦流放以来,这种情况一直在发生,当时以西结对血纯和邪教的痴迷盛行于耶利米的初步尝试,从圣贤教派转向内部宗教,道德和普世宗教。 正如圣经学者卡尔·布德(Karl Budde)所写:“以西结将异教徒彻底隔离和避免一切污染的趋势,从以西结的见解转移到了实用的法律书中,”使以西结成为真正的“犹太教之父”。[27]卡尔·布德(Karl Budde) 以色列流亡的宗教, 普特南的儿子(Putnam's Sons),1899年(archive.org),第206-207页。 同样的迷恋是《以斯拉记》的中心主题。 在得知犹太-巴比伦人已经回到巴勒斯坦之后,他们采用混血婚姻,并且“圣洁的种族已经被该国人民所污染”,以斯拉使他们发誓要“遣散所有外国妻子和他们的子女”。 (以斯拉记 9:2;10:3)。 三个世纪后,马卡比人本着同样的精神,对同化犹太人进行了血腥的内战,以建立自己的哈斯摩尼王朝。 这 禧年记 从这个时期开始,宣告:

“如果有人希望在以色列把女儿或姐姐交给外邦人的后裔,他肯定会死,他们要用石头将他打死; 因为他在以色列发了耻辱。 他们要用火焚烧这妇人,因为妇人羞辱了她父亲的名,她就必从以色列中生出根来”(30:7)。

因此,通过偏执狂的灭绝恐惧和优越感,犹太人社区中始终由最坚定的犹太人保持凝聚力。 他们也许在任何特定时间都没有就“对犹太人有什么好处”达成共识,但他们都绝对致力于以色列的宏伟命运。 在历史的关键时刻,他们有能力迫使世界犹太人“作为一个人”行事(士师记20:1)。 一个很好的例子是1933年XNUMX月,希特勒(Hitler)成为德国总理之后,针对德国的运动 头版文章 在英国 每日快报 题为“犹太宣战德国”。 全世界的犹太人团结起来,”并宣称:“世界各地的以色列人民宣布对德国发动经济和金融战争。 全世界有XNUMX万犹太人 作为一个人在一起 向共同宗教主义者的德国迫害者宣战。” 发起袭击的塞缪尔·昂特米尔(Samuel Untermeyer)称 “他们种族的叛徒” 所有拒绝参加德国抵制的犹太人。[28]我书中的细节, 从耶和华到锡安 2018,第260-261。

这些控制着其余犹太人的永恒的利未人是最合乎圣经的人:就像1936年的大卫·本·古里安一样, “圣经是我们的使命。” 它们也是最内婚的。 时至今日,在犹太社区中,随着人们的社会等级的提高,内婚现象变得更加强烈。 梅耶·罗斯柴尔德(Mayer Rothschild)的后代缔结的58宗婚姻中,有一半是堂兄之间的婚姻。 在一百多年的时间里,他们在堂兄之间结婚了16次,同时也接纳了几位精挑细选的哥特式贵族加入世系。[29]凯文·麦克唐纳(Kevin MacDonald), 独居的民族,同前。 cit。, k。 5044–53。 凯文·麦克唐纳(Kevin MacDonald), 分离及其不满:走向反犹太主义的进化理论, 普拉格(Praeger),1998年,点燃2013年 , k。 3975–4004。 同样,这种模式是符合圣经的:内婚制在圣经中被高度重视,以至于多数文化都理解禁止乱伦。 亚伯拉罕与同父异母的姐姐莎拉(Sarah)结婚。 他的儿子以撒(Isaac)与表弟伯特利(Bethuel)的女儿丽贝卡(Rebecca)结婚(后者的母亲米尔卡(Milcah)与叔叔纳霍尔(Nahor)结婚)。 以撒的儿子雅各布娶了他叔叔拉班的两个女儿为妻。 更不用说犹大人,犹大人(后来的犹太人)的创始人,与他的儿daughter他玛(Tamar)怀孕。

基督教个人主义问题

福音的信息是犹太唯物主义的对立面。 耶稣的教导是“在天上为自己储存宝藏”(马太福音6:20-21),与耶和华对“万国之宝”的贪婪形成了鲜明的对比(哈该2:7-8)。 耶稣强调个人得救的同时,也对血缘关系怀有强烈的敌意,[30]马太福音19:10-12,马太福音19:29,马太福音22:30,马太福音24:19,马可福音13:17,路加福音14:26,路加福音21:23,路加福音23:29,1哥林多前书7:1-8。 保罗教导说,靠基督重生可以消除种族团结,社会等级制度,甚至消除性别认同:

“既没有犹太人也没有希腊人,既没有奴隶也没有自由人,既没有男性也没有女性,因为你们都在基督耶稣里。 只需成为基督,您就是亚伯拉罕的后裔,即应许中所指的继承人”(加拉太书3:28-29)。

以色列的宗教与强烈的种族团结感没有区别。 相反,至少可以说,基督教对种族概念不友好。 天主教教义尤其发展了对人类灵魂的原子性,非遗传性和均等主义的观念,无法解释人类心理的多层复杂性,也无法解释将每个人与祖先联系在一起的“无形的忠诚”,以便使用Ivan Boszormenyi-Nagy的任期。[31]伊万·博佐门·纳吉(Ivan Boszormenyi-Nagy), 看不见的忠诚:代际家庭治疗中的互惠, Harper & Row, 1973, p. 56。 奥古斯丁是中世纪天主教的主要参考文献,在活人与死者之间筑起了一道墙,谴责这两个世界之间的任何让步都是魔鬼的工作。 因此,用菲利普·阿里耶斯(PhilippeAriès)的话说,通过侵蚀死者和活人之间的团结联系,而后者是传统社会中私人和公共邪教的重要组成部分,天主教逐渐将“团结死亡”转变为“孤独死亡”。[32]菲利普·阿里耶斯(PhilippeAriès), L'Homme devant la mort, 第1册 Le Temps des gisants, 苏伊尔(Seuil),1977年。

由于这些原因,有人认为基督教为现代西方个人主义奠定了基础,这具有讽刺意味的是一种集体的心态。 人类学家路易斯·杜蒙(Louis Dumont)在他的著作中解释 个人主义论文 传统社会是整体和等级制的:它们使个人服从社区,并根据个人的社会角色赋予其价值。 这样的社会承认,只要这些个人不挑战社会秩序及其整体动力,而保留了确认规则的例外,那么某些人就放弃了他们的社会存在,以寻求个人的启蒙。 根据杜蒙(Dumont)的说法,基督教通过强调救赎而破坏了文明的平衡 这个世界是每个人的事。 每个基督徒都被定义为“与上帝建立自我的关系”,即使他没有放弃将世界当成恶毒者或僧侣,因此他也成为了“世界上的个人”。 分阶段来看,“整体主义将从意识形态中消失”,“外来的个体将成为现代的,外在的个体”。[33]路易·杜蒙(Louis Dumont),“基督教的开端:从超自然的个体到世间的个体”, 个人主义随笔:人类学视野中的现代意识形态 芝加哥大学出版社,1992年,第23页。 59-XNUMX。

教会通过强调基督徒社区构成了“基督的身体”,确实提供了一个新的整体框架来取代旧的框架。 但是,当这个有机体开始瓦解时,剩下的就是个人主义和平均主义。 那是当奇怪的政治理论出现时,认为人不是天生的社会动物,而是一个仅出于私利而从事社会契约的自私的人。[34]TD威尔登(TD Weldon)在概念上有益地概念化了“有机”和“机械”政治理论之间的对立。 国家与道德:政治冲突研究, 麦格劳-希尔图书公司,1947年(在archive.org上)。 托马斯·霍布斯(Thomas Hobbes,1588-1679年)是第一位“社会契约”理论家,他教导说,在自然状态下,“人是人的狼”,并且只因为害怕暴力死亡而同意放弃自己的部分自由。 霍布斯之后是亚当·斯密(Adam Smith,1723-1790年),他同样假设每个人都完全以自己的利益为动力,但他认为,在自由竞争的社会中,个人自私的总和将创造一个公正的社会。 我们知道结果:货币法则彻底剥夺了西方人的社会地位,西方人拥有最小的有机单位,即核心家庭,几乎没有生存。

立即订购

基督教与现代个人主义之间的因果关系当然是有一定道理的。 但是必须仔细权衡证据。 我们必须考虑到这样一个事实,即尽管是基督教,西方中世纪社会还是高度有机和整体的。 个人主义是一种现代现象。 问题可以这样表达:欧洲文明是整体归功于基督教还是尽管基督教? 第二种情况似乎是这样的:封建制度具有复杂的社会结构,它是基于古老的印欧思想,但遭到教会的强烈反对。 它强调族裔团结,承认精神并非独立于血统,并报复血亲是神圣的职责。 它的核心价值观是英勇的,代表了整体主义和个人主义之间的微妙平衡。 从远古时代开始,英雄就是一个杰出的个体,他体现了其社区的最高理想和/或为此牺牲了生命,在死后仍继续赋予其社区权力。[35]刘易斯·理查德·法内尔 希腊英雄崇拜与不朽观念 (1921年)Adamant Media Co.,2005年。 尽管基督教在某种程度上将英雄崇拜与圣徒及其遗物融为一体,但它大大缩小了观念:教是基督教内部的唯一英雄之路。

尽管如此,将西方个人主义完全归咎于基督教仍是夸大其词,杜蒙也一样。 “社会契约”理论是否具有基督教的启发甚至令人怀疑。 它们出现在奥利弗·克伦威尔(Oliver Cromwell)深深的犹太化英格兰中,可以看作是对基督教国家有机成分的犹太攻击。 霍布斯是清教徒,但他的宗教思想是如此典型的犹太人(“神的国度最初是由摩西部建立的对犹太人的统治”,他声称)有人猜测他可能是马拉诺人。[36]罗伯特·克莱纳克(Robert Kraynak),“托马斯·霍布斯神学中的弥赛亚思想”, 犹太政治研究评论, 1992年秋季,在jcpa.org上。

我认为,不可能就基督教的优缺点得出任何简单的结论,因为我们无法客观地区分基督教的成就与不属于基督教的成就。 没有公共宗教,任何文明都无法繁荣。 对于基督教来说,另一种宗教是否能比基督教做得更好呢?这是一个徒劳的问题。 基督教在基督教世界的衰落中所起的作用同样是没有意义的。 然而,当今我们文明所面临的挑战要求对基督教的遗产和不足进行认真的人类学研究,并寻求补救措施。

德国人的整体反应

我们至少应该学习最近的历史。 一个很好的例子就是德国文化试图抵抗英国重商主义和法国启蒙运动的消解力量。 德国人的反应是约翰·哥特弗里德·冯·赫德(Johann Gottfried von Herder,1744-1803年)的名字,他是康德的门徒,也是黑格尔,尼采,歌德等人的导师。 在他的论文中 人类历史哲学思想 赫德(1784-91)批评了契约主义的政治理论,并用国家的类型学代替了假定人类具有不变性的启蒙运动的个人主义人类学。 各个民族被视为具有不同种族,地理和历史的特定“天才”组成的集体生物。 对于认为一个人的国籍是偶然的法国学校,赫德坚持认为,个人的基本素质是由他的国籍决定的。 他是所谓的民族理论的发起者。 他的观念 沃尔克 是浪漫主义的主要潮流的起源,并且也影响了Shelling的唯心主义。 赫德还对黑格尔(1770-1831)产生了深远的影响,黑格尔的历史哲学代表了德国民族主义的高潮,他的国家概念是“上帝在地球上的行军”,而他的“世界历史人”的概念正在不断发展。历史。

德国的民族主义在不需要拒绝基督教的情况下盛行。 也许是因为德国路德教具有浓郁的民族气息,就像今天的俄罗斯东正教基督教一样,但是与法国天主教不同,法国天主教一直要求忠于总部设在梵蒂冈的外国跨国力量。 另一方面,很难断言基督教在18th 世纪德国主义。

希特勒是这一运动的产物。 “恩·赖希(Ein Reich),恩·沃尔(ein Volk),恩·富勒(einFührer)” 是彻头彻尾的有机学说的表达,纳粹流行语也是如此 民族共同体 (“人民社区”)。 在 我的奋斗, 希特勒赞扬阿里扬(Aryan)愿意“尽其所能为社区服务”。[38]希特勒 Mein Kampf,完整无删节, Raynal&Hitchcock,1941年(archive.org),第408-409页。 有趣的是,在1939年,拉比哈里·沃顿(Rabbi Harry Waton)写了以下有关希特勒和纳粹主义的文章:

“纳粹主义是对犹太教的模仿; 纳粹主义采用了犹太教的原则和思想来摧毁犹太教和犹太人。”

纳粹哲学始于假设:种族的血脉决定了种族的性质,发展历程和命运。 […]纳粹分子是否有意识地从圣经本身中汲取了这一理论。”

Waton进一步补充:

“希特勒宣称犹太人的意识对雅利安人是毒药,这是西方世界本性所获得的最深刻的见解;” 他意识到这一点的能力是他天才的证明,也是他的力量和性格表现出的好奇魅力的秘诀。 […]他担心的不是犹太人的实际能力或财富,而是犹太人的性格。 […]危险是犹太精神在外邦人心中的隐性渗透。 这是一种危险,因为“雅利安人”的思想无法抵抗它,但必须屈服。”[39]哈里·沃顿, 一个针对犹太人的计划和对所有反犹太人的回应, 1939(archive.org),第54页,64-67,200。

沃顿对希特勒观点的来历是错误的:它们并非源自希伯来圣经。 他们也没有欠福音。 他们汲取了与牧民相同的文化潮流,而牧民的主要来源是基督教前的英雄主义心态。 除此之外,希特勒的人类学概念是建立在普遍原则基础之上的,同一时期的大多数犹太知识分子都知道得很好,但更喜欢外邦人不知道的东西。

有趣的是,现代社会学和人类学的两个最重要的奠基者-对作为决定个人行为和思维方式的整体系统的社会的科学研究-恰好是德国犹太人(尽管他们都没有表达对犹太人的同情):Emile涂尔干(1858–1917)和路德维希·冈普洛维奇(1838-1909)。 这是Gumplowicz的代表作:

个人主义心理学的最大错误是人认为的假设。 […]。 因为思考的不是人本人,而是他的社会共同体。 他思想的来源是他生活所在的社会媒介,他呼吸的社会气氛,除了他的社会环境对他的大脑的影响所必需的以外,他别无选择。 […]。 个人只是简单地扮演接收光线的棱镜部分,按照固定的规律将它们溶解,然后让它们以预定的方向和颜色重新发出。”[41]路德维希·冈普洛维奇(Ludwig Gumplowicz), 社会学概论 (1899),《交易书籍》,1980年(在books.google.com上),第240、760页。

格拉茨(Graz)的政治学教授古普洛维奇(Gumplowicz)现在因其理论与希特勒的理论过于接近而声名狼藉。 在他的主要著作中, 种族斗争 (1883年),古普洛维奇(Gumplowicz)制定了“同心主义”的自然法则(来自希腊文 同生,意思是亲属关系)。 共生指的是使同一种族的成员团结起来的一系列因素(“种族”则失去了相当的含义,与“人民”或“民族”相差无几)。 在同基因感觉形成的起源处,首先是血亲,但也包括教育,语言,宗教,习俗,法律和生活方式(直至烹饪习惯)。 换句话说,同基因的感觉是基于身体的相似性和智力的相似性。

西方国家目前正遭受同基因内聚力的病理削弱,这主要是(但不完全)是由于大规模移民所致。 凯文·麦克唐纳(Kevin MacDonald)提到了几项独立研究,这些研究表明,种族异质性削弱了社会结构并增强了个人主义。 例如,社会学家罗伯特·普特南(Robert Putnam)表明:

移民和种族多样性往往会减少社会团结和社会资本。 美国的新证据表明,在种族不同的社区中,各个种族的居民都倾向于“弯腰”。 信任度(甚至是自己的种族)较低,利他主义和社区合作较少,朋友较少。”[42]罗伯特·普特南(Robert D. Putnam),“E Pluribus Unum:“二十一世纪的多样性与社区”,15年2007月10.1111日,https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/14/j.0176...XNUMX.x

因此,欧洲人愿意以继承自基督教的普遍道德原则为名,欢迎数以百万计的第三世界移民,以及将任何白色自豪的表达定为犯罪,这是一种形式。 “病理利他主义”.[43]病理利他主义的标准著作是:芭芭拉·奥克利(Barbara Oakley),阿里尔·纳夫(Ariel Knafo),古鲁普拉萨德·马达夫(Guruprasad Madhavan)和戴维·斯隆·威尔逊(David Sloan Wilson)(编辑), 病理利他主义牛津大学出版社,2012。

基督教不单单对此事负责。 它确实侵蚀了传统的种族共生主义,从长远来看,它通过个人主义和普遍主义的混合削弱了我们的集体免疫系统。 但是病理因素本身并不是基督教的内生因素:正如麦克唐纳(MacDonald)所记录的那样,[44]凯文·麦克唐纳(Kevin MacDonald), 批判文化:关于犹太人卷入XNUMX世纪知识和政治运动的进化论, 普拉格(Praeger),1998年,点燃2013年,第7章,“犹太人参与塑造美国移民政策”。 犹太精英一直是大规模移民的最主要推动者,公众对这些政策的认同也得到了承认(观看 “移民策略”)。 通过这样做,他们使想要吸血的国家有机体衰弱,同时增强了其本国寄生生物的同基因生命力。

洛朗·盖伊诺特(LaurentGuyénot)博士是《 从耶和华到锡安:嫉妒的上帝,被选的人,应许之地……文明的冲突,2018和 JFK-9 / 11:深度状态的50年,进步出版社,2014年.

说明

[1] 亨利·福特, 国际犹太人 (在archive.org上), 卷2,小伙子。 23年13月1920日第XNUMX号,引自凯文·麦克唐纳(Kevin MacDonald), 文化起义:关于西方文明,犹太影响和反犹太主义的论文, 西方出版社,2007年,第240页。 XNUMX。

[2] 哈里·沃顿, 犹太人与人类计划。 对所有反犹太人的回答, 1939(archive.org),第52、125、132页。

[3] 西格蒙德·弗洛伊德, 摩西和一神教, Hogarth Press,1939年(archive.org),第33-34页。

[4] 像往常一样,我引用天主教徒的圣经 新耶路撒冷圣经 , 并没有像其他英文翻译那样出于令人讨厌的原因将神的名字YHWH更改为“ The Lord”。

[5] 创世记37:35; 42:38; 44:29; 44:31。

[6] 摩西·赫斯(Moses Hess) 罗马和耶路撒冷:犹太民族主义研究,1918(archive.org),第48、64-65、71、98页。

[7] 内塔尼亚胡(Benzan Netanyahu), 犹太复国主义的奠基人 (1938), 巴尔弗书籍(Balfour Books),2012年 , 点燃版,157-66和2203-7。

[8] Lucien Wolf,“什么是犹太教? 今天的问题,” 每两周评论 XXXVI,(1884),第237-256页, http://www.manchesterjewishstudies.org/wolf/

[9] 凯文·麦克唐纳(Kevin MacDonald), 一个人一个人住:犹太教作为集体进化的策略, 普拉格(Praeger),1994年。

[10] 艾萨克·卡德米·科恩(Isaac Kadmi-Cohen), Nomades: Essai sur l'âme juive, 菲利克斯·阿尔坎(Felix Alcan),1929年(archive.org),第98页,第143页。

[11] 莫里斯·塞缪尔(Maurice Samuel), 你们这些外邦人 纽约,1924年(archive.org),第74-75页。

[12] 阿尔弗雷德·诺西格(Alfred Nossig) 整合Judentum, 1922年,第1-5页(上 www.deutsche-digitale-bibliothek.de/item/DXCTNNZZ3INPTI2S3MYPGLQOFR3XSW22)

[13] Yosef Hayim Yerushalmi, 扎科尔:犹太历史和犹太记忆 (1982), 华盛顿大学出版社,2011年。

[14] 拉斐尔·帕泰(Raphael Patai), 犹太人的心, 韦恩州立大学出版社 , 1977年(在books.google.fr上)。

[15] 亨利·福特, 国际犹太人 卷2,小伙子。 23 上。 CIT。

[16] 劳伦斯·威尔斯 外国国王朝廷中的犹太人:古代犹太朝廷的传说,康奈尔大学出版社,1995年,第189页。 XNUMX。

[17] 格雷格·费尔顿, 寄主和寄生虫:以色列的第五专栏如何消耗美国, 坏熊出版社,2012年。

[18] 吉拉德·阿兹蒙(Gilad Atzmon), 流浪的谁? 犹太人身份政治研究, 《零书》,2011年,第21页。 XNUMX

[19] 安德鲁·乔伊斯(Andrew Joyce),“弥赛亚的帕里亚(Pariah to Messiah):巴鲁克·斯宾诺莎(Baruch Spinoza)的工程化神化”,第1至第3部分, 西方观察家 月5 2019。

[20] 布伦登·桑德森(Brendon Sanderson),“为什么要马勒(Mahler)? 诺曼·勒布雷希特(Norman Lebrecht)和犹太天才的建构,” 西方观察者 四月13 2011。

[21] 莎拉·施密特(Sarah Schmidt),“'Parushim':美国犹太复国主义者历史上的一个秘密情节”, 美国犹太历史季刊 65,不。 2年1975月121日,第139–XNUMX页,在ifamericansknew.org/history/parushim.html上。

[22] 布鲁斯·艾伦·墨菲(Bruce Allen Murphy), 布兰代斯/法兰克福的关系:两位最高法院大法官的秘密政治活动,牛津大学出版社,1982年,第10页。 XNUMX。

[23] 里奥·史特劳斯 关于马基雅维里的想法, 芝加哥大学出版社,1978年,第42页。 XNUMX。

[24] 迈克尔·雷丁(Michael Ledeen),“从摩西那里学到了什么马基雅维利(一个秘密的犹太人?)” 犹太世界评论, 7年1999月XNUMX日, www.jewishworldreview.com/0699/machiavelli1.asp。

[25] 丹尼尔·埃拉扎尔(Daniel Elazar), 社区与政体:美国犹太人的组织动力,1976年,引用于凯文·麦克唐纳(Kevin MacDonald), 分离及其不满:走向反犹太主义的进化理论, 普拉格(Praeger),1998年,点燃2013年,点燃(k。 6668–91。

[26] 凯文·麦克唐纳(Kevin MacDonald), 文化起义,同上。 cit。, 第 90-91。

[27] 卡尔·布德(Karl Budde) 以色列流亡的宗教, 普特南的儿子(Putnam's Sons),1899年(archive.org),第206-207页。

[28] 我书中的细节, 从耶和华到锡安 2018,第260-261。

[29] 凯文·麦克唐纳(Kevin MacDonald), 独居的民族,同前。 cit。, k。 5044–53。 凯文·麦克唐纳(Kevin MacDonald), 分离及其不满:走向反犹太主义的进化理论, 普拉格(Praeger),1998年,点燃2013年 , k。 3975–4004。

[30] 马太福音19:10-12,马太福音19:29,马太福音22:30,马太福音24:19,马可福音13:17,路加福音14:26,路加福音21:23,路加福音23:29,1哥林多前书7:1-8。

[31] 伊万·博佐门·纳吉(Ivan Boszormenyi-Nagy), 看不见的忠诚:代际家庭治疗中的互惠, Harper & Row, 1973, p. 56。

[32] 菲利普·阿里耶斯(PhilippeAriès), L'Homme devant la mort, 第1册 Le Temps des gisants, 苏伊尔(Seuil),1977年。

[33] 路易·杜蒙(Louis Dumont),“基督教的开端:从超自然的个体到世间的个体”, 个人主义随笔:人类学视野中的现代意识形态 芝加哥大学出版社,1992年,第23页。 59-XNUMX。

[34] TD威尔登(TD Weldon)在概念上有益地概念化了“有机”和“机械”政治理论之间的对立。 国家与道德:政治冲突研究, 麦格劳-希尔图书公司,1947年(在archive.org上)。

[35] 刘易斯·理查德·法内尔 希腊英雄崇拜与不朽观念 (1921年)Adamant Media Co.,2005年。

[36] 罗伯特·克莱纳克(Robert Kraynak),“托马斯·霍布斯神学中的弥赛亚思想”, 犹太政治研究评论, 1992年秋季,在jcpa.org上。

[37] 卡尔·马克思, 在犹太问题上 1843年 www.marxists.org/archive。

[38] 希特勒 Mein Kampf,完整无删节, Raynal&Hitchcock,1941年(archive.org),第408-409页。

[39] 哈里·沃顿, 一个针对犹太人的计划和对所有反犹太人的回应, 1939(archive.org),第54页,64-67,200。

[40] 3年1945月XNUMX日给马丁·博尔曼(Martin Bormann)的信,在古纳·海因索恩(Gunnar Heinsohn)中引用:“是什么使大屠杀成为独特的种族灭绝?” 种族灭绝研究杂志, 2000年411月,第413–XNUMX页,位于migs.concordia.ca。

[41] 路德维希·冈普洛维奇(Ludwig Gumplowicz), 社会学概论 (1899),《交易书籍》,1980年(在books.google.com上),第240、760页。

[42] 罗伯特·普特南(Robert D. Putnam),“E Pluribus Unum:“二十一世纪的多样性与社区”,15年2007月XNUMX日, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x

[43] 病理利他主义的标准著作是:芭芭拉·奥克利(Barbara Oakley),阿里尔·纳夫(Ariel Knafo),古鲁普拉萨德·马达夫(Guruprasad Madhavan)和戴维·斯隆·威尔逊(David Sloan Wilson)(编辑), 病理利他主义牛津大学出版社,2012。

[44] 凯文·麦克唐纳(Kevin MacDonald), 批判文化:关于犹太人卷入XNUMX世纪知识和政治运动的进化论, 普拉格(Praeger),1998年,点燃2013年,第7章,“犹太人参与塑造美国移民政策”。

 
隐藏248条评论发表评论
忽略评论者...跟随Endorsed Only
修剪评论?
    []
  1. I am struck by the idea that judaism is pure materialism and rejects the idea of an afterlife.

    So….if there is no reward in heaven for good behavior, and no punishment in hell for bad behavior…..well, you see where this is going.

    This supports the particularist philosophy that jews do “what is good for the jews” and to hell with the rest of humanity.

    With no thought of an afterlife, you can screw everybody else over and not have to pay for it.

    Opening the borders of host nations to replace the original European inhabitants is a socially engineered genocide; deliberate, cold, vicious, diabolical, and totally aligned with a group that does not believe in a final judgement or any sort of retributive justice.

    I happen to think they are in for a very nasty surprise.

  2. Makes sense – ‘an eye for an eye’ has always been a monetary compensation system. I call the religion a fascistic capitalism, what with the exceptionalism. But how to reform it? Or is it really a case of seeing a cult for what it is, and de-Judifying the victims?

  3. Baxter 说:
    @Robert Dolan

    “With no thought of an afterlife you can screw everybody else over and never have to pay for it.”

    Well said. Things are going to get very interesting in the next decade. International Judaism is becoming obnoxiously overt in its demands for submission on the part of non Jews.

    It’s become apparent to me Judaism is just as perverse, if not more so, than other religions. What is the ultimate ‘sin’ a Jew can commit? Embrace Christ.

    • 回复: @joeshittheragman
    , @anon
    , @Art
  4. GUYÉNOT: “There is no expectation of an afterlife in the Torah.”

    Blind: Wrong!

    Psalms 23: “Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil, for … Surely goodness and mercy shall follow me all the days of my life; and I shall dwell in the house of the LORD forever=

    Ecclesiastes 12: And the dust returns to the earth as it was, And the spirit returns to God who gave it.. for all is vanity. … – (Read on Sukkot)

    • 回复: @Moi
    , @Laurent Guyénot
  5. Jewish power comes down to this. They’re not a religion or a nationality. They’re a corporation/cabal that periodically shelters behind the concepts of religion or nationality, whatever suits their interest at the moment.

    • 回复: @Justsaying
  6. Anonymous [AKA "JewishQuestion"] 说:

    While the afterlife is rarely explicitly mentioned in the OT, it is alluded to (e.g. in Psalm 73). In the NT, some Jewish rabbis, particularly the Pharisees, clearly do believe in the resurrection and afterlife (e.g. Matthew 22:23; Acts 23:8; etc).

    • 回复: @Laurent Guyénot
    , @Vojkan
  7. Vojkan 说:

    If we apply the “if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck” principle to Yahweh then Yahweh is most likely Lucifer and the Jewish religion / philosophy is actually luciferism.

    • 回复: @Rev. Spooner
  8. Anonymous [AKA "Phyllotaxis"] 说:

    The important thing to ask is… how can one call this generational approach wrong? It is successful for a multitude of reasons. War is bad, and parasitism is bad, but these resultant successes are stretched back millenia. After decades of casual study, I must acknowledge that they are doing something right.

    • 回复: @Tsigantes
    , @Bruce Arney
  9. Anonymous [AKA "A2n2o2n"] 说:

    I happen to think you are right.

    Historically, as a tribe, in spite of their accomplishments the Jews appear to be exceptionally prone to self-sabotage. Their Achilles heel is a Himalayan-sized hubris.

  10. hope to meet you next saturday in Grenoble (France), for a discussion with Israel Shamir! Inch Allah you both shall open the way for some kind of miracle. Your essay is very french, as cutting edge as our “Widow”, as we call Mrs Guillotine: whenever she comes near to a possible lover, she becomes his widow. Please stop cutting necks, and restaure breathing. That is what we need now, and clever Jews as Eric Zemmour are already breaking down your geometrical Chirico’s style nightmare building.

    • 回复: @Laurent Guyénot
    , @Vojkan
  11. Moi 说:
    @Robert Dolan

    If Judaism a religion of materialism, little wonder America loves Jews and Israel without reservation. And if Christianity laid the foundation of individualism, as the writer avers, then we are screwed because individualism leads to greed.

    PS: Did not Kant say something like ethics is the normative science of human beings living in SOCIETY…

  12. Jake 说:

    “Jews often find themselves divided on crucial issues and involved in radically opposed movements; yet in the end, even their antagonisms seem to synergically advance their common higher purpose. Many illustrations can be found of the extraordinary capacity of the Jewish elites to separate like a school of fish and then reunite.”

    Such as, Jews who use Mohammedans and Mohammedanism as the main weapon with which to batter Christ and Church, while other Jews hate the very thought of Ishmael so much that they act always to urinate on Mohammedans. But those opposite Jews always come together, like insects drawn back to the hive.

    Jewish socialists/communitarians and Jewish libertarians always swirl widely and end up back on the same page, which first and foremost is about being anti-Christ and anti-Christendom and therefore necessarily anti-peoples of historic Christendom.

    ‘The Issue’ is not about the Old Testament being materialistic; ‘the issue’ is that the Talmud is materialistic.

  13. Moi 说:
    @Professional Stranger

    “Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil, for I am the meanest SOB in the valley.” LOL!!!

  14. @Baxter

    obnoxiously overt
    ----------
    Actually, that’s the Jews Achilles Tendon. They just can’t stand being low key. They are driven to rub their “success” in everybody else’s face. That’s when they finally go too far and are driven out as what has happened to them in the last 3-4 thousand years repeatedly. But – alas, they never do learn.

    • 同意: hamtok
  15. @Anonymous

    As I wrote, the Pharisees’ resurrection is a grossly materialisitc interpretation of the Greek anasatasis, derived from Maccabean literature: corpses revived in the coming Last days. The Sadducees were faithful to the Torah by rejecting any notion of immortality. Jesus rejected both views. A quote from my book:

    Jesus himself clearly expressed his conception of anastasis when he was questioned by Sadducees hoping to confront him with contradictions in the doctrine. They presented him with the theoretical case of seven brothers successively married to the same woman (Mark 12:18–27). The Sadducees, faithful to the Torah, did not believe in any form of life after death, and opposed the Pharisaic conception of resurrection, born of Maccabean literature. But Jesus refuted both Pharisees and Sadducees by asserting a spiritualist conception of anastasis: “For when they rise from the dead, […] they are like the angels in heaven.”

  16. @maria poumier

    Your essay is very french

    I take it as a compliment.
    But Chirico was Italian, and I will continue cutting the necks of the many-headed monster.
    Eric Zemmour, you mean the national-Zionist who is invited on every national TV to tell the French to be nationalist islamophobs and take example on Israel (and might be our next president)? Sorry, I’d love to meet you and hear Shamir (as I love to read him), but I’ll be away next saturday. Kinds regards.

  17. @Professional Stranger

    First, neither Psalms nor Ecclesiastes are part of the Torah (=Pentateuch).
    Second, Ecclesiastes is not even part of the Tanakh (=Hebrew Bible): as I wrote (but you obviously didn’t read), it belongs to Hellenistic literature rejected even by rabbinical Judaism.
    Third, in your Psalms quote, “forever” (whatever the Hebrew word) is obviously synonym with “all the days of my life”. In any case, Psalms is poetry, not doctrine.
    You could have found much better quotes, for there are many exceptions to the rule, but the rule remains: no individual immortality in the Torah. Take off your Christian glasses and you will see it.

  18. Vojkan 说:
    @Anonymous

    Resurrection on Judgment Day. Until then the dead are on a waiting list. Only the just among Jews get resurrected then. And it is not afterlife, it is back to life. The rest stay dead. Whetever the Jewish definition of ‘just’.

    • 回复: @anon
  19. anon[210]• 免责声明 说:
    @Robert Dolan

    There is no afterlife. Ethics work better when they are based in physical reality, not make-believe.

    We know this from 150 years of neurology where you damage areas of the brain, and faculties are lost…You can cease to recognize faces, you can cease to know the names of animals but you still know the names of tools…

    我们被要求考虑的是,你损坏了大脑的一部分,关于思想和主观性的一些东西丢失了,你损坏了另一个,而且丢失了更多,但是你在死时损坏了整个东西,我们可以离开大脑,我们所有的功能都完好无损,能认出奶奶并说英语!

    山姆·哈里斯
    神经科学与来世

    • 同意: RVBlake, advancedatheist
    • 回复: @Anon
  20. Vojkan 说:
    @maria poumier

    Zemmour is as zionist as most of his kin. His discourse has utilitarian motives, not ethical ones.

  21. anon[210]• 免责声明 说:
    @Jake

    Jewish socialists/communitarians…like these Jewish communists? “Not one of them claimed that anything belonging to him was his own, but all things were 共同财产 to them…and distribution was made unto every man according as he had need.” (Acts 4:32-35)

    “……原始基督教是布尔什维克主义。”

    路德维希·冯·米塞斯
    社会主义:经济社会学分析
    第29章:基督教与社会主义,第413页。 XNUMX
    https://www.econlib.org/library/Mises/msS.html?chapter_num=35#book-reader

  22. anon[210]• 免责声明 说:
    @Vojkan

    The resurrected golem narrative is the Jewish version of the afterlife; however, it conflicts with the Platonic immortal soul narrative. Both narratives are included in Christianity, with the typical Christian believing simultaneously that “I’m going to heaven soon, and I won’t need this stupid body there, thank goodness” and that their magically eternal soul is going to be reunited with their stupid body anyway.

    Confront someone with the fact that they are going to die and they will believe just about any story that tells them it isn’t true and they can, instead, live forever, even if it means taking the existential elevator. Now we can see this as the biggest bias of all. It has been demonstrated in over 400 empirical studies.

    Stephen Cave: The 4 stories we tell ourselves about death | TED Talk

  23. Desert Fox 说:

    Read the Protocols of Zion, it is all right there in the open, the zionist plan for a zionist NWO that will make Orwells 1984 look like a paradise!

    • 回复: @anon
    , @awry
  24. Moi 说:
    @Jake

    “Such as, Jews who use Mohammedans and Mohammedanism as the main weapon with which to batter Christ and Church, while other Jews hate the very thought of Ishmael so much that they act always to urinate on Mohammedans.”

    Jake, there is no such religion as Mohammedanism. Muslims don’t worship Muhammad or any human. Also, good Christians Americans are so nutty and ignorant that they diss Islam, the only religion, other than Christianity, that honors Christ. In fact, Muslims arguably are even more respectful of Christ than most Christians.

    • 同意: mark green
    • 回复: @anonymous
    , @sheliak
  25. anon[210]• 免责声明 说:
    @Baxter

    > International Judaism

    Rabbi Jewsus was the original Jewish Globalist.

    马修28:19 因此,去做门徒 所有国家.
    卢克24:47 Proclaimed in his name to 所有国家.

    > demands for submission on the part of non Jews

    Just like this, right?

    以赛亚书45:23 To me every knee will bow, every tongue will swear allegiance.
    浪漫14:11 To me every knee will bow, every tongue will swear allegiance.

    这就是 圣钩‘s Jew Testament for ya! No different than the OT or Talmud.

  26. anon[210]• 免责声明 说:
    @Desert Fox

    The Zionist Jew World Order is outlined in the Jew Testament too. “然后他摧毁了迦南的七个国家,并将其土地作为遗产分给了以色列。” (使徒行传13:19)

    • 同意: Desert Fox, Tsigantes
    • 回复: @Laurent Guyénot
  27. awry 说:
    @Desert Fox

    Read the Protocols of Zion, it is all right there in the open

    Yeah like the tunnels under the cities filled with explosives to hold the goyim hostage by the Jews?
    Some things in it seem to come true, but that is just confirmation bias. Also the techniques discussed by the purpored “Elders” of course exist and are employed by the Jews/Zionists (like creating controlled opposition to control all sides etc.)

  28. AaronB 说:
    @Laurent Guyénot

    Jews have always maintained that the Tanach cannot be understood without the oral tradition, and I know of no sacred tradition where the main texts are understandable without the – generally extensive – commentary.

    Even Buddhism, which I studied extensively, is liable to be misunderstood as it is actually practiced by people who consider themselves Buddhists, if you merely focus on parts of the main texts – and it is a fact that the version of Buddhism the West knows has very little relation to real Buddhism.

    This kind of hyper-literalist reading of religious texts seems to be a major defect in the modern Western mentality – the modern West struggles to understand societies who do not express themselves in the simple, straightforward manner of science.

    People who are interested in HBD are especially prone to interpret everything in a crude, literalist, simplistic way – they generally represent the scientific approach at its crudest and most unsophisticated, where it starts shading into parody.

    In any event, whatever the Torah says, Jews themselves have always defined their religion as being intensely concerned with the afterlife. The Talmud and Mishna are literally saturated with this concern, and Jewish education points to it at every step.

    I went to an orthodox Jewish school before I became an atheist, and I can tell you that the afterlife was mentioned every single day. It was a major focus of our education.

    I think the most intelligent thing to do is see how Jews actually practice their religion, rather than what your interpretations are. The language of the Torah is only as significant as the interpretations Jews give it, not how you would interpret it.

    There are many fine books all over the web – where Jews write for other Jews, not gentiles, and where one can get an extremely clear idea of what the Jewish religion is about. There is no need for the dark guesses on unz.

    I am actually now reading a book on on Nachman of Breslov, a Jewish saint buried in Ukraine, where thousands of Jews make an annual pilgrimage. The man was a saint, and any Christian, Buddhist, or Sufi saint would recognize a true brother in him- and his writings are enormously influential in Israel and among modern Jews. THAT’S actual Judaism, that’s what modern Jews are ACTUALLY inspired by.

  29. j2 说:
    @Laurent Guyénot

    “no individual immortality in the Torah. ”

    Sadducee view, not Pharisee. For sure it is also Zionist view, but not Kabbalistic.

    In Torah, in Genesis, there is Enoch who did not die but was taken up to God. In the same way in Zohar sages raise up to Heaven (in Idra Rabba) but they also come down from Heaven (in Idra Zuta), and then they all drink blood.

    • 回复: @Laurent Guyénot
  30. Montefrío 说:

    As a Zen adept (practitioner) for 50+ years, I continue to be amazed by those who believe Zen to be “materialistic” because it is atheistic. Nothing could be further from the truth ; Zen is a purely transcendental “philosophy”, if you will. Judaism, per this piece, while “theistic”, may be far more materialistic than I ever believed. A very though-provoking piece! It called to mind an Argentine novel by the late Hugo Wast (https://infogalactic.com/info/Hugo_Wast): El Kahal, never translated into English to my knowledge; the above link may offer clues as to why not.

    The realization brought about by Zen practice and insight combined with Buddhist ethics is very different from the beliefs of theists and materialistic atheists alike. It creates a psychological state of humble self-assurance that every individual is more than an animated flesh lump that simply perishes entirely, or, conversely, is an immortal individuated being whose state-of-being in “eternity” is determined by a “judgement” made by a Superior Being with discernment and will. The result is a way of life that is largely inner-directed and almost always remarkably serene. One wonders if the same could be said of the “Abrahamic” religions that seem so overburdened with rules and dogma.

    A score-keeping life with the hope of an afterlife (individual immortality) as reward or the worship of one’s own collective identity disguised as a “Supreme Being”, neither seems particularly rational in the eyes of some observers.

  31. Rodop 说:

    For the time I remember there have been endless writings about the Jews putting them usually in the undesirable categories.
    Whatever the case, having in mind their small number, there is no other group of people, who influenced so much the world in science, and culture.
    I wonder why people hate them so much.

  32. @AaronB

    You have complicated the thought that this Anglican atheist had that the author had contributed considerably to my understanding, with the help of intuition and introspection, the hold of Jewishness on Jews. (It is not difficult to see how Zionism came to give emotional substance to the lives of many in the 20th century of course, but, despite the attractions of gap years in Israel and the like, there must, I thought/think, be more).

    In my imagination I still see the idea of my living forever through the gene pool of my extended family (“blood is thicker than water” said a cousin to me recently when noting that she was a life member of the political party most traditionally opposed to mine) as analogous to what the author attributes to Jewish ethnocentricity. It is not a big stretch to see people able to emphasise the memes as much as the genes and shore up the cultural affinity (despite all the varieties of tradition, ritual, practice and language that Jews have embraced over 2000 years) with Jewish ritual of which the Friday night family dinner may be the most universal. If there is a reason for supposing that this will not disintegrate it maybe that, despite Israel becoming at best a neutral element for young diaspora Jews, the decay of other ethnic groups’ solidarity and health will have served as a lesson to Jewish neighbours not to let things fall apart in the same way.

    • 回复: @AaronB
  33. Polemos 说:

    Hobbes uses Moses as example of ‘personating’ the sovereign, making this argument to show how the sovereign we see is just the personation of the sovereign we as individuals cannot see. This invisible sovereign is the accumulation of all the people who bind themselves to the covenant and acts as One Man, whom Hobbes then explicitly says is a Mortal God. It is not the man who sits on the throne that Hobbes speaks of, but the Man the people form out of their collective spirit and mutual vows. They fear this Man not necessarily out of fear of being killed, but by the fear that the Man will kick him out of himself and forbid the offender any clothes, large buildings, art or commerce, scientific investigation, or decent conversation. Each person who acts to exclude or ostracize or punish in this way is personating, in their own life, what the Mortal God commands for them in their own life; the ‘state of nature’ is a hypothesis Hobbes invents (he also explicitly says that, not meaning it to be the case of our actual histories) to justify shifting the hostility from one another to the Us v Them scale. He’s reversing Socrates in 共和国, who moves from the individual to an imaginary city to explain the individual, as Hobbes gets us to see why Nations fight by asking us to consider why we don’t forget to lock our own doors or why we take our arms when going out into the country or beyond. Both of them take it as given that people are personed and persons are peopled, and both conclude there must be One who rules (in) either, the people or the person.

    My Hobbes material is from the usual, or rather the material surrounding the usual, chapters from “利维坦”.

    Definitely is right to see how a nation is a 精神 form of life. A biological form of life has many fractal patterns, in all of its molecules, its organisms, its generations, and the niches this form of life stakes out in its world, of which it is one of that world’s forms. For informational purposes, much of that “dirt” or “dust” reality is already spiritual, invisible to the eyes or hands or tongue but accessible to their analogues. What holds a body together, after all? It’s far more than just what we cannot see or taste, but we feel this is less miraculous when we look at bugs under microscopes or access our neighbor’s wifi, but the same polyform multidimensional universe remains. Wonder takes a change in understanding that not all ghosts are dead, and not all of the dead become ghosts, but some are both and others are neither. Finding out you’re already dead is a shock to a lot of people, so fear of dying remains.

  34. @Laurent Guyénot

    “… in your Psalms quote, “forever” (whatever the Hebrew word) is obviously synonym with “all the days of my life”…”

    Indeed it is. The text literally says “for length of days”. See : Online Hebrew Interlinear Bible – Scripture4All, Psalm 23, last sentence.

  35. Sorry, but this whole article is extremely biased & in many ways inaccurate. Though, the author, whose strong anti-Judaist stance is evident, has shown perspicacity in some matters, especially with regard to normative Judaism, I think most of his sources are either marginal or utterly wrong (or simply of no importance), I would just offer a selection of serious works on Jews & Judaism (actually, just a few books, but better than nothing).

    [更多]

    Alan Segal: Life After Death: A History of the Afterlife in Western Religion

    Moshe Idel: Ascensions on High in Jewish Mysticism: Pillars, Lines, Ladders

    Walter Laqueur: The Changing Face of Anti-Semitism: From Ancient Times to the Present Day

    Albert Lindemann: Esau’s Tears: Modern Anti-Semitism and the Rise of the Jews

    Amos Elon: Israelis

    Paul Mendes-Flohr: The Jew in the Modern World: A Documentary History
    ....

    and these are works I find shallow or self-congratulatory:

    Paul Johnson: A History of the Jews

    Prager-Telushkin: Why the Jews?: The Reason for Antisemitism

    • 回复: @Franklin Ryckaert
  36. @Rodop

    “…Whatever the case, having in mind their small number, there is no other group of people, who influenced so much the world in science, and culture. I wonder why people hate them so much…”

    Because, to use your own expression, “there is no other group of people, who influenced so much the world in…science and culture”? Yes, but also in pseudo-science, degenerated culture and destructive politics, and we goyim are on the receiving end of these “contributions”.

    • 同意: Robert Dolan
    • 回复: @Rodop
    , @Druid
  37. AaronB 说:
    @Wizard of Oz

    Ethnocentrism is not a “naturalistic” fact. It cannot be made sense of using HBD principles.

    Your genes merely want to survive – obviously having no narrow preferences with regard to who you mate is the optimal survival strategy.

    Further, refusing to be absorbed by a stronger foe – remaining stubbornly independent – can come at immense cost and is clearly a sub-optimal strategy. Jewish genes would have been much, much better served by intermarriage and assimilation.

    Ethnocentrism is held together by a belief in the supernatural. This is evident also from the fact that Europeans completely lost their ethnocentrism the moment they gave up their religion, and that secular Jews have a much higher intermarriage rate.

    Only people who have supernatural beliefs can be ethnocentric.

    • 回复: @Franklin Ryckaert
    , @Art
  38. @AaronB

    Genes only “survive” if they mate with similar genes (we are talking here of course about gene-plexes, not about individual genes). Race-mixing does not assure the survival of a race, it assures its own destruction.

    “…Only people who have supernatural beliefs can be ethnocentric…”

    It depends on what kind of supernatural beliefs. Universalistic religions do not strengthen ethnocentrism, neither do hyper-individualistic salvation schemes.
    The best solution is a religion that is either ethnic or strongly ethnocentric in itself.
    Judaism fulfills both requirements.

    • 回复: @AaronB
    , @Anon
  39. @j2

    Sadducee view, not Pharisee. For sure it is also Zionist view, but not Kabbalistic.

    I would have made my article too long if I had mentionned the Talmud of the Kabbale.
    1) The Kabbale (the root of all occultist Western traditions) is not materialistic in the sense that it believes in spirits, angels, demons, egregors, etc. However, it is materialistic in the sense that it seeks to uses these exclusively for material, worldly purpose (for example, to gain physical immortality). The Kabbale is basically magic.
    2) the Talmud also incorporates the notion of eternal life (as well as resurrection, on the side), but in order to distinguish the souls of Jews from the souls of the Goyim, who are like animals.
    But that doesn’t change what I said: Biblical Judaism, which remains the core and the foundation of the Jewish frame of mind, whether religious or atheist, is exclusively oriented toward the eternal existence of Israel.
    It is true that most everyday religious Jews believe in their eternal life, but, as I explained, this is coming from Reformed Judaism, on one hand, and from man’s natural tendency (natural religion), on the other. They believe so in spite of the Hebrew Bible (though probably not aware of). Again, educated Jews and every biblical scholar knows that the Hebrew Bible is materialistic.

    • 同意: utu
  40. @Bardon Kaldian

    You are talking about Jewish mysticism, which is as little “mainstream” in Judaism as is Sufism in Islam.

    • 回复: @Bardon Kaldian
  41. Svevlad 说:

    To visualize how Judaism works, try to imagine what would happen if every single nation ever started thinking that way – yup, that’s the sound of eternal global war.

    It’s not just a Jewish thing, it’s a way of thinking that’s widespread from the Adriatic eastwards, except the Jews really really mastered that behavior and long-term (ab)use of it. For proof, just look at the politics of the Balkans, MENA and the Caucasus

    • 回复: @Robert Dolan
  42. @Franklin Ryckaert

    First, I gave a link (Segal) to notions of afterlife in all western religions (which includes all variants of Judaism). Another work on this topic worth reading is this:

    Hiroshi Obayashi: Death and Afterlife: Perspectives of World Religions

    For specifically Jewish notions, one of the better books is:

    Leila Leah Bronner: Journey to Heaven: Exploring Jewish Views of the Afterlife

    As regards Kabbalah, most people don’t know it has been Jewish mass movement from, say, 16th to early 19th C, virtually a parallel religion of most European Jews. It began in the 11th C Provence & Spain as an esoteric sect for a handful of imaginative intellectuals, but in next centuries had become popular & mass Messianic movement, sucking in hundreds of thousands & leading to disasters of false expectations (in the case of Sabbatai Zevi). Chief authors on Kabbalah are Gerschom Scholem and Moshe Idel.

    • 回复: @Laurent Guyénot
  43. @Rodop

    Whatever the case, having in mind their small number, there is no other group of people, who influenced so much the world in science, and culture.

    Er…not quite.

    Of course they are over-represented in many fields, but so were, say, Italians in Florence from 1300-1600 (Dante, Brunelleschi, Michelangelo, Petrarch, Boccaccio, Machiavelli, Leonardo da Vinci, Galileo,…), or Germans from 1770-1830 (Hamann, Herder, Kant, Hegel, Euler, Goethe, Gauss, Mozart, Beethoven, Clausewitz, Scheele, Grimm brothers, Humboldt brothers,..) & later- which dwarfs all Jewish achievement put together.

    During some historical periods, some groups are high achievers. From ca. 1850-2000 Jews have been super-achievers; from 1750-1945, “Aryan” Germans had been hyper-achievers.

    我不会提到古希腊人,那些凡人的神。

  44. Agent76 说:

    May 24, 2019 The richest 10% of households now represent 70% of all U.S. wealth

    Share of top 1% wealthiest increased to nearly 32% in 2018 from 23% in 1989.

    https://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-richest-10-of-households-now-represent-70-of-all-us-wealth-2019-05-24?mod=mw_theo_homepage

    Oct 22, 2014 113 Federal Reserve members make \$250,000 annually

  45. Blake 说:

    Only explanation for calling them a race is if he only came across the European Jews (ashkenaz) in USA. Judaism like Islam or Christianity is made up of many ethnicities.

  46. @Laurent Guyénot

    GUYÉNOT:: “Is the Hebrew Bible materialistic? There is no expectation of an afterlife in the Torah.”

    Wrong: Ecclesiastes 12: And the dust returns to the earth as it was, And the spirit returns to God who gave it.. for all is vanity. … – (Read on Sukkot)

    The Hebrew Bible is not materialistic. The 5 books of Moses is not all there is to there is to the Hebrew Bible.

    • 回复: @AaronB
  47. GUYÉNOT: Is the Hebrew Bible materialistic?

    Blind: Thanks for asking! The answer is no!

    The Jewish Bible supports the idea of life after death, but gives contradictory answers to the question of where it happens…
    ● Life after death wherever God lives –
    Ecclesiastes 12:7-8 (read on Sukkot) . “And the dust returns to the earth as it was; and the spirit returns to God who gave it. Vanity of vanities..all is vanity.”

    ● Life after death wherever God lives –
    Psalms 23 6 Surely goodness and mercy shall follow me all the days of my life;
    I shall dwell in the house of the LORD forever.

    ● Life after death(both heaven and hell) here on Earth – Daniel 12: 1-2. some “..people shall be saved, every one whose name shall be found written in the book..many of those who sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to EVERLASTING life, and some to shame and EVERLASTING contempt.=

    ● Life after death, place undefined, probably here on Earth – Isaiah 33:14 The sinners in Zion are afraid; trembling hath seized the ungodly: ‘Who among us shall dwell with the devouring fire? Who among us shall dwell with EVERLASTING burnings?’

    ● Life after death possibly “upward” somewhere, but who knows? – Ecclesiastes 3:21 “Who knows whether the spirit of man goes upward, and the spirit of the beast goes downward to the earth?”

    ● Psa 16:10 For thou wilt not leave my soul (Nehfesh) in hell; (Sheol)

    ● Samuel I Chapter 2 6. The Lord kills, and returns to life; he brings down to Sheol, and brings up.
    ...
    The contradictory answers are due to different books of the Tanakh being written by different authors with different opinions, at different times. The fact that 2 of the 3 quotes above are both from Ecclesiastes, yet give different answers, just goes to show you: the last verse(12) of Ecclesiastes was added by a later editor to make it politically correct. However, both those Ecclesiastes verses do agree on the name of the entity that (possibly) survives death: “spirit” (רוּחַ ruach). But note that Ecclesiastes 3 says that man has no more claim to it than the beast. (Human exceptionalism is dismissed)

  48. AaronB 说:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    我不太确定。

    If you look at the facts, Europeans were quite ethnocentric while Christian, and only lost that once they became atheist.

    Judaism is a universalist religion – Jews have a special mission to mankind.

    Furthermore, Judaism does not promote racial purity. Officially, the father can belong to any race whatsoever and the child will be considered 100% Jewish. And converts from all races enter the Jewish ethnic stream throughout history, and can become very prominent.

    What Judaism, and all religions, do promote is the survival of the religious unit – which is not a natural unit, but a supernatural one.

    However, in the real world, religions generally coalesce around a particular race or ethnic group more or less, so that survival of the religious unit is somewhat coterminous with that of the ethnic unit.

    But never perfectly so.

    However, it does not seem that race can be established as a primary value – in naturalistic terms, it is unclear why genes would care if races rather than individuals survived.

    And indeed we see that any group that adopts the naturalistic perspective, ceases to be ethnocentric.

    As for religion, it often promotes ethnocentrism as a second order effect, but never as a primary value. The survival of the Jewish people, it was seen, is not the survival of a racially pure group.

  49. Anon[297]• 免责声明 说:
    @anon

    Ethics work better when they are based in physical reality, not make-believe.

    A belief in the metaphysical does not mean that ethics are not “based in” physical reality.

    Nor does a belief in the metaphysical mean that ethics “work worse” in physical reality. Quite the opposite.

    A lack of metaphysical belief quickly leads one to an ethics based in observable cause and effect outcomes.

    What that looks like is” If I kill John, I get his land and that is good”, etc.

    In fact, this is the Jewish ethic that is repeated throughout the Tanakh. ie: “Genociding the Canaanites / gentiles is good because we get their land as a result” (justified by any number of false political excuses like the farcical “idolatry” that merely means not prostrating oneself to the Jews).

    The modern statement of that torah-based genocidal Jewish, land-stealing ethic is “is it good for the Jews”?

    In fact, this is the core ethic behind the ultimate Messianic goal of the Jewish political group.

    A society that believes in the metaphysical has an investment in something that continues beyond this life. Therefore, the promise of earthly reward (eg: as the result of murder, theft, etc) is subsumed to the preservation of the soul and the respect of its counterparts in one’s neighbors.

    That understanding is the basis of modern ethics as Western civilization knows them.

    Materialist ethics, as represented by the Jewish religion, which logically and quickly become homicidal are not that basis. They are what existed prior to civilization.

    The belief in the metaphysical is merely the injection into wider society of the belief in higher principles that allow it to largely transcend a primary orientation toward widespread animalistic reward seeking behavior.

    Without this visualization of a higher ethics and principles that the metaphysical soul and its heaven provides, ethics and behavior would devolve as the result of a widespread perception that what is “good” is measured by what one gains from any deed no matter how barbaric.

    Atheists and other materialists may transcend this animal ethics and the resultant behavior nonetheless, but make no mistake that they have merely adopted and secularized what is in essence an ethical system born of the historical metaphysical religious view (or metaphor if you wish). This metaphysical religious view is responsible for these socially widespread ethics. Atheism is not responsible for socially widespread higher ethics that transcend animalistic cause and effect ethics. This religious view was born to counter the natural cause and effect ethics of atheists and other materialists.

    Functional civilization was the result. Within that functional civilization today, we have a variety of marauding mafias that have either informally rejected these higher ethics for materialist ethics (Italians, Mexicans, etc) or have formalized lower materialist ethics (Jews) into a system that is masquerading as a respectable religion.

    Judaism keeps itself together, in spite of their animalistic ethics, by directing those ethics only onto gentiles whom Judaism openly states that it perceives as literal non-human animals. Within their own group, they deify one another and therefore are able to apply a higher tier of ethical behavior within their group. As a result, the Jews get civilization within their group and open non-ethical de facto war with all non-Jewish groups. As their texts state.

    Materialists can rationalize away “god” when practicing higher ethics, but most of society does not and will not operate in such nuanced niche territory that, frankly, is the domain only of a small selection of higher IQ individuals who are not anywhere near a majority. This is why the metaphysical is still relevant today and will continue to be relevant for as long as we continue to breed human beings as they presently exist.

  50. @Laurent Guyénot

    Guyénot “Ecclesiastes is not even part of the Tanakh”

    Blind: What shit!
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hebrew_Bible
    Ketuvim (Writings)[hide]
    诗意
    Psalms Tehillim
    Proverbs Mishlei
    Job Iyov
    Five Megillot (Scrolls)
    Song of Songs Shir Hashirim
    Ruth Rut
    Lamentations Eikhah
    Ecclesiastes Qohelet
    Esther Ester
    历史的
    Daniel Daniyyel
    Ezra–Nehemiah Ezra
    Chronicles Divre Hayyamim

    https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/ecclesiastes-kohelet/
    圣经
    Ecclesiastes (Kohelet)
    Traditionally read during Sukkot, the Book of Ecclesiastes grapples with the meaning of life.

    Guyénot expresses extremist fringe-cult opinions.

    • 回复: @Seraphim
  51. AaronB 说:
    @Professional Stranger

    His thesis makes no sense. What difference does it make “where it came from” if Jews did in fact accept the afterlife for over 2,000 years?

    One can argue the details all day, but there is already enough evidence against his thesis.

    Today, orthodox Jews are hugely concerned with the afterlife. So the materialist psychology he describes as the source of their power is simply incorrect.

    And we know the afterlife featured prominently in the Talmud. So again, the materialist psychology he describes as the source of Jewish power has not been operative for over 2,000 years.

    So the thesis is obviously wrong.

    • 同意: Professional Stranger
  52. @Svevlad

    是的,你是对的。

    In fact, the “racism” that jews blame on whites actually originates and emanates from their own tribe.

    The nose uses projection as a reflex, constantly accusing us of doing exactly what they are doing.

    When you begin to understand the JQ, you realize why the world has been turned upside down.

    They’re nuts.

    • 同意: Desert Fox
    • 回复: @Tsigantes
  53. @AaronB

    judaism is not remotely universalist in actual practice, no matter what high sounding phrases are promoted for marketing purposes.

    judaism is particularist.

    The main reason Christ came was to remove the chains of particularism to extend God’s love to all of mankind.

    The jews are no longer God’s chosen people, but they are unwilling to accept this fact, and this is the essence of jewish supremacism.

    jews project onto whites their own cohesive group ego inflation, calling whites “supreeeeeeeeemists,”
    when in fact it is jews that are the group with the mistaken God complex.

  54. ““The Bible speaks of an immortality right here on earth. In what consists this immortality? It consists in this: the soul continues to live and function through the children and grandchildren and the people descending from them. ”

    I am ever amazed at the varied strategies to dismantle the faith and central point of life even for the Jew —

    It is the relationship one has with God in this life and the next.

    Jesus’ story about Lazarus refutes the premise here.

    -----------
    The Jewish Bible supports the idea of life after death, but gives contradictory answers to the question of where it happens…”

    The references cited are not contradictions.
    =

  55. I recognize that the jews of reject Christ and therefore his teaching.

    Jews themselves may consider the Torah, the Pentatuch materialistic as they did beseech God to allow them to be as other nations and one example was to have a King in authority over them.

    But in reality the nation of Israel is but a place holder for something spiritual —

  56. Alright, my last post on the topic ….

    The author is, as far as I know, mostly correct re normative Judaism. Just, his presentation is frequently literal & ahistorical.

    Judaism remains a rather down-to-earth religion & its early concepts are similar to those we can find in the Epic of Gilgamesh & Homer: when you die, your psyche, which is just a shadow without vital energy, goes somewhere under the earth crust (Sheol, Hades) & leads there an unenviable “existence” of a devitalized semi-conscious entity (see Odyssey’s visit to Achilles).

    This is a strange belief & I don’t get how people came to it. It seems more natural, for a primitive mind, that there is some force giving you life, and after you die- it dissipates or evaporates like a mist, and there is the end to all individual existence. Why an anemic shadow would persist somewhere in an underground pit is a mystery, at least to me.

    Jews got their resurrection ideas from Persians after the exile (6th C BC), and they also tinkered with Greek Platonic ideas of immortality of the soul. Later, some had adopted a rather crude variants of reincarnation.

    So, you have at least four ideas.

    1. when you die, it’s over forever

    2. there will be resurrection, in final days (official belief)

    3. soul is immortal (also official, but not too consistent with 1 or 2)

    4. reincarnation (many variants of Kabbalah)

    So, while you can juggle with quotes from the Bible, Talmud etc., it remains that for historical Jewish culture in past, say, 500-1000 years, the accent remains on this life & general ideas of afterlife are not as central as are for Christians.

    Historical Christianity remains otherworldly & pessimistic, while Judaism is thisworldly & mildly optimistic, similar to Islam (which also affirms Heaven & Hell, but is, like Judaism, more oriented toward taboos on food & other elements of behavior).

    As a skeptical Jew had said: When a good Christian dies, he goes to Heaven; the same with good Hindu. When a good Jew dies- he just dies.

    • 回复: @Dumbo
  57. anonymous[151]• 免责声明 说:
    @Moi

    Jake, there is no such religion as Mohammedanism.

    Don’t bother, for they know and still do it on purpose. These cursed Islamophobes try to attribute polytheist values on Islam, by using such false terminology, but it burns them that such deceit never sticks. But, as long as Satan is on their side, they will keep trying.

    Also, good Christians Americans are so nutty and ignorant that they diss Islam, the only religion, other than Christianity, that honors Christ.

    Exactly! I see these pagan lowlifes with “Allah is Satan!” T-shirts, and I am first irritated and then somewhat amused.

    Those idiots don’t see that the God they refer to as “Satan,” is the same God who the blessed Christ worshipped (of course, let’s be clear, this is 不能 the “god” in the man-like imagery of “the father,” with the beard and all). In Islam, the Almighty One is beyond imagination, and thus such imagery is pure heresy.

    This is their core theist ideology, which is essentially an oxymoron they call 一神论三位一体论;

    三位一体是 一位神 of all existence, 由组成 三个神圣的人:父亲,儿子和圣灵。

    Those idiots don’t see that Muslims worship the “one God of all existence” directly, and hence they are referring to the Almighty One as “Satan.”

    How pathetic are they?!

    • 回复: @Moi
    , @anon
  58. @AaronB

    “…Judaism is a universalist religion – Jews have a special mission to mankind…”

    That is a different kind of “universalism” than in the universalist religions of Buddhism, Christianity and Islam. In these religions anyone can convert and the religious community is not congruent with an ethnic group. Conversion to Judaism is possible but is not encouraged and converting to Judaism means becoming a member of the Jewish 民族报.

    As for Judaism’s “mission to mankind”, some people see that as arrogant (the “light unto the nations” complex and all that). Islam arrogates itself a similar mission, but here it becomes openly militaristc : Islam has to conquer the world (“for Allah” of course).

    The 3 Abrahamic religions all try to “change the world” and thus have been in conflict with the world throughout history. Buddhists only try to change themselves and thus Buddhism has been the most peaceful religion of the world.

    • 回复: @AaronB
    , @anonymous
    , @Druid
  59. @Bardon Kaldian

    All kinds of unscholarly people write all kinds of unscholarly books on religions, and find whatever they want to find there, doing their own salad. My topic is about the Jewish elites’ world view, which is biblical. You’re mixing the issues. If you read my article carefully, I am not even claiming that “Judaism” is materalistic: Reform Judaism, which is an imitation of Christianity (with Israel as the suffering Messiah instead) includes belief in the afterlife. That is not the point.
    I don’t know Moshe Idel, but you should read what Israel Shahak writes about Gershom Scholem– and I had come to the same conclusion before reading him: Scholem pretty much “invented” Jewish mysticism, to deceive the Goyim and the Jews altogether. Easy to check: quote me a book about Jewish mysticism before Scholem invented it.

    • 回复: @AaronB
    , @Bardon Kaldian
  60. AaronB 说:
    @Robert Dolan

    Well, Christians often fell short of their high religious standards as well.

    Humans are rather imperfect beings.

    But the Jewish religion itself is concerned with the spiritual salvation of all of mankind, so it is correct to describe it as a universalist religion.

    That was my only point.

    • 回复: @James Forrestal
  61. @Robert Dolan

    Dolan: judaism is not remotely universalist

    Blind: Judaism needs to be qualified by “Orthodox” and “Reform”.

    A huge schism exists within Judaism on the question of Jewish nationalism: Reform, with guys like Alan C. Brownfeld, and Ultra-Orthodox. It’s like 2 different religions, with 2 different gods: one religion worships a universal god and the other a national god.

    But tracing the nationalism, via the religious route:
    [[In Geiger’s view, “the essence of Judaism was the religious-universal element. All the remainder was the fruit of historical conditions…and..should be abolished.”]] —– Rabbi Abraham Geiger (1810–74) was a leading ideologists of the Reform movement.

    That means: it’s OK to cherrypick your old religious myths.

    Geiger’s “All the remainder” included Jewish nationalism, and it was the fruit of the historical conditions of defending a set of universal religious principles while living amongst people hostile to it.

    In other words: the religious universal element came first, then a religion was needed to carry it, then a nation was needed to defend the religion, “then a KING was needed..” [1 Samuel 8:10.] to rule the nation, then a nation-state was needed to secure the nation, then idolatrous ideas of “holy nation” and “holy state” found their way into the religion. Concepts directly opposed to the original set of universal religious principles!
    Then came the final step: the Jewish Zionist Atheist, where defending the nation-state became an end in itself.

    However in Reform Judaism, there has been a return to grass roots lately. Pittsburgh Platform 1885 says “we consider ourselves no longer a nation, but a religious community”. And for even more recent updates click this..

    http://www.acjna.org/acjna/default.aspx Allan C. Brownfeld explains Reform Judaism’s position on Jewish nationalism – The American Council for Judaism.

    How Judaism needed nationalism to defend universalism, is an example of using devices contradictory to your principles in order to defend them. Another example is the US cause in Vietnam: “we had to destroy the village in order to save it”.

    AND FINALLY:
    Purging Judaism of nationalism is a work in progress. The principle that is evolving is: Nothing is holy but god himself, all else you make holy are idols. The story so far goes something like this..
    Moses destroyed the golden calf the Israelites had made, while he was up on the mountain. But then he slipped up himself….. Numbers 21:9. “And Moses made a serpent of brass, and set it upon the pole; and it came to pass, that if a serpent had bitten any man, when he looked unto the serpent of brass, he lived.”
    An error Hezekiah corrected …. Kings II Chapter 18:1. “Hezekiah..began to reign..he broke in pieces the brazen serpent that Moses had made; for unto those days the children of Israel did offer [sacrifices] to it; and it was called Nehushtan.”

    Get the pattern? Destroying idols. No-one and no-thing is immune.

    Nevertheless, “holy name”, “holy altar”, “holy nation”, “holy seed”, “holy day” and “holy land” remain. More work needs to be done.

    See also: “Israel’s 50-Year Occupation Is Challenging Judaism’s Moral Integrity” – By Rabbi Allan C. Brownfeld http://www.acjna.org/acjna/default.aspx

  62. @anon

    These words by Welsey Clark (son of rabbi Benjamin Jacob Kanne) would be more useful if put side by side with Deuteronomy 7:24, where Yahweh says that he will deliver to Israel “seven nations greater and mightier than [it],” adding: “you must utterly destroy them; you shall make no covenant with them, and show no mercy to them. You shall not make marriages with them…” (7:1–2). And why not add Maimonides’ 诫命书: “Putting the seven nations to the sword is a duty incumbent on us; indeed, it is an obligatory war.”

    • 回复: @follyofwar
  63. anonymous[151]• 免责声明 说:
    @Jake

    I penned a reply to Moi above, but it applies more to Islamophobic godless lowlifes like you.

  64. AaronB 说:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    That’s not quite correct.

    Only the earliest and most primitive forms of Buddhism was about only changing oneself, and this was heavily criticized as selfish by later Buddhism, that of Tibet and the Far East.

    But even early Buddhism was highly evangelical. To believe one is in possession of the tools for salvation, and not want share it, would be insanely selfish.

    As for the relationship between religion and violence, Buddhist countries were as violent as any other countries. Japan was a hyper violent Buddhist society, and Thailand and Burma were in a state of unceasing warfare, and today, Buddhist monks are at the forefront of violence against Muslims in Burma.

  65. AaronB 说:
    @Laurent Guyénot

    我不明白

    Last year we were being told here that elite Jewish opinion isn’t biblical, but based on the Talmud, indeed that its an egregious mistake to think that Judaism was a biblical religion, etc, etc.

    All sorts of quotes were gathered showing how the Rabbis considered the Torah less important than the Talmud or at least seriously incomplete without it….

    Now we are being told its really the opposite, that the a Jewish elites view is biblical, and the Talmud is ignored….

    Man, just when you think you have a handle on the Unz editorial line 🙂

    • 回复: @j2
    , @Anon
  66. anonymous[151]• 免责声明 说:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    Islam arrogates itself a similar mission, but here it becomes openly militaristc : Islam has to conquer the world (“for Allah” of course).

    You think screaming “thief” will obfuscate your own thievery?

    Who actually has been trying to conquer the world in our current reality? The Muslims or the Supremacist Pagan Polytheist Mangods-Worshipping Whitey Christians? Do you even see reality, or are you living in some hallucinatory existence?

    But, as I have said before, Islam will indeed “conquer” the world… not militaristically as you put it most deceitfully (you are a lowlife), but simply by espousing the truth of its Monotheism. The following simple truth will prevail over all mankind, and all pagan peoples will in time humbly submit to it, on their own accord.

    说:“他是真主,[是] 一,真主,永恒的避难所。 他既不生也不出生,对他来说也没有任何等价物。” 古兰经 112

    Buddhists only try to change themselves and thus Buddhism has been the most peaceful religion of the world.

    Yeah, like no one knows about the terrorist buddhist monk scumbags in Burma, Sri Lanka, etc.?

    Enjoy your hallucinatory world, pagan… for it will not last, I promise you.

  67. Truth3 说:

    The fact that they do not fear retribution in the next world is all you need to know to fear what they will do in this world.

    Boycott them.

    避免他们。

    Tell the truth about them.

    • 同意: Robert Dolan
  68. DaveE 说:

    This is a fascinating piece. It’s going to take some study to fully digest it all….. but I think the author is definitely onto the truth.

    The Jew seems to base its evolutionary strategy on the insect world, like an ant colony. Whether this is done consciously I don’t know, but the result is the same, an infestation that’s impossible to destroy without destroying the surroundings, also.

    And of course the obvious parallels of everything being done collectively, while deviation is unheard of and definitely prohibited. I’ve heard that ants will destroy their own if they “get out of line”……… or lobsters pulling their fellow captives back into the pot if they try to escape.

    I’ve often thought that “The Bug” from the ’80’s movie “Men in Black” was an apt metaphor for The Chosenites, with its many component bugs acting and appearing as one big, ugly, pernicious and mendacious creature whose basic purpose is to destroy Humanity…….

    Anyway, thanks for a brilliant piece.

  69. Moi 说:
    @anonymous

    Indeed, it is sad. I was raised to respect all religions.

  70. j2 说:
    @AaronB

    I do not know much of Judaism and nothing of Jews, but I have this, maybe wrong, impression that Zionism, including B’nai B’rith and Freemasonry, was the driving force in the creation of Israel and whatever plots (like two world wars) were caused by this plan. Am I wrong in assuming that Zionism is not especially religious but more nationalistic and therefore the question if the leaders of Zionism valued more Talmud or Torah is rather irrelevant? And while there were clear and intentional instances of fulfillment of prophesies (such as the great persecution, people being collected from many countries, and just read from Sanhedrin 97b forward some time: work for no pay (slaves), hairless and so on), they were merely needed to convince religious Jews that the time of redemption has come (though there was no Messiah) and they can move to Palestine and create Israel? Then it would also follow that Zionists are also not Kabbalistic (and did not believe in Zohar), but some of the religious Jews to be convinced were. All this resulted to what certainly looks like a messianic plan, but it was simply a nationalistic plan, and a plan for world control of course, as Ron Unz’s last article points out.

    • 回复: @AaronB
  71. Anon[932]• 免责声明 说:
    @AaronB

    Judaism is a universalist religion – Jews have a special mission to mankind.

    你是个骗子。

    1. In the Jewish texts, the Rabbis state that they only consider Jews to be “man”. Therefore, your use of the term “mankind” is typical Jewish deception and a reference only to Jews.

    This, combined with your statement, is a primary illustration of exactly why you people are reviled and why you are a lowlife.

    Judaism mandates an upcoming apocalyptic harvest period where non-Jews will be genocided preceding the Jewish messianic period of Jewish world rule.

    How does that “serve” non-Jews?

    Of course, you will not explain your vague claims of service. Your lack of explanation invalidates them.

    2. Judaism is not universalist. Universal morality implies that all morality will be evenly applied across all groups. Jews have a two tiered system of morality. One system for Jews and one for non-Jews. You know this to be a fact. The originally Jewish concept of “love thy neighbor” referenced only fellow Jews. The Jews are commanded to subsume if not genocide non-Jews toward acquiring their land and resources. Per the Jewish texts.

    In contrast, Christianity applies universalist morality and is therefore universalist. It has one set on moral standards to be applied to Christians and non-Christians alike. That is the meaning of universalism.

    Furthermore, Judaism does not promote racial purity. Officially, the father can belong to any race whatsoever and the child will be considered 100% Jewish. And converts from all races enter the Jewish ethnic stream throughout history, and can become very prominent.

    Jews actively practice racial purity more than any other race and western cultural group. See my (later) below comments about Jewish inbreeding disease and phenotype.

    Maternal genetics are prized above belief, which is not indicative of religion but race, and in the United States it is visually obvious from any racial dot map that, going only on skin color, the two most racially pure neighborhoods with a significant population in the United States are represented by Jewish Flatbush Brooklyn and the all-Jewish town that is north of NYC.

    Furthermore, your implied definition of race is a false one. Skin color is not the sole determinant of race. It is only one proxy. Genetic inclusion and exclusion determines race, as Jews know.

    As the representatives of the only humans that are relatively unmixed with pre-human hominid genetics, the “White” race exists due to relative genetic exclusion of those hominid genetics. Better tribes within that modern broad category have ever-less hominid genetics.

    The Jewish race exists due only to genetic inclusion of Jewish maternal genetic lineage, though it stringently practices genetic exclusion through tough cultural barriers to joining the primary Ashkenanzi cultural group (to the point that they are more inbred than any other race in the West and the only group to experience widespread inbreeding disease).

    Skin color is not the only qualification for race, though it is a large (but not sole) proxy for some races. Darker skin color is an accurate but not the sole defining phenotype proxy for the presence of pre-human (and sometimes archaic) hominid genetics.

    For an example of an exception that disproves the skin color = race rule, non-White groups (groups with significant hominid admixture) with especially high European-Neanderthal admixture, like Jews and other Armenoid types, can still have nominally White skin.

    In contrast, “Black” skin is universally an accurate proxy for the presence of archaic hominid genetics that originated from any one of many archaic hominid species (Erectus, Heidelbergensis, etc).

    The survival of the Jewish people, it was seen, is not the survival of a racially pure group.

    In comparison with racially pure groups, the difference between Judaism and a racially pure group is the difference of no difference. The bulk of the Jewish group represents a racial purity that matches or exceeds any other European group. Where that purity migrates over to the Sephardic or Mizraim Jewish groups, tight cultural barriers are in place that largely prevent genetic crossover.

    Jews don’t see “falasha” as part of their group and Asian Jews are inconsequential in number; especially in any region where long-legged Ashkenazi ladies are in abundance for cross-breeding.

    Heck, if you were an actual cultural group and not a race then your primary narrative about the Samaritans would not include their supposedly corrupted racial admixture as a reason to reject them. But it does.

  72. @Laurent Guyénot

    You can’t be serious. As for Jewish spiritual culture, it has had many phases & had been influenced by virtually all neighbors.

    Inter-testamental Judaism is mostly interesting for us for its visionary voyages & a mixture of “high religion”, astronomy & low occultism. Three books of Enoch are best examples.

    完整的伪经:2018 年版与以诺、贾舍尔和禧年

    Then, there were Merkavah mystics somewhere around 4 C AD, while Kabbalah proper began as a set of speculations in 10th-11th C AD. It was well known in European circles so that Latin translations of Kabbalistic texts were available in the 16th and 17th C.

    This, Christian Kabbalah uneasily mixed with central Western esotericism, Hermetism (Corpus Hermeticum dates back to 1st C AD Pagan Alexandria, and that’s where the West’s chief esoteric tradition of alchemy, correspondences etc. comes from). Later Western occultists mixed their version of Kabbalah (Tree of Life, worlds of emanation, Adam Kadmon) with Hermetism & Neo-Platonism and created a mess which has persisted to the 21st C.

    Garth Fowden: The Egyptian Hermes: A Historical Approach to the Late Pagan Mind

    Scholem invented nothing (although his interpretations of Kabbalah seem to be influenced by his friendship with philosopher Walter Benjamin). He was just first serious modern scholar of Kabbalah, which was generally shunned by secularized modern Jews & treated with contempt as something shameful, a relic of primitive superstitions.

    Moshe Idel is a prolific scholar & the best modern author on Hebrew Kabbalah.

  73. Anon[932]• 免责声明 说:
    @AaronB

    我不明白

    Last year we were being told here that elite Jewish opinion isn’t biblical, but based on the Talmud, indeed that its an egregious mistake to think that Judaism was a biblical religion, etc, etc.

    All sorts of quotes were gathered showing how the Rabbis considered the Torah less important than the Talmud or at least seriously incomplete without it….

    Now we are being told its really the opposite, that the a Jewish elites view is biblical, and the Talmud is ignored….

    Man, just when you think you have a handle on the Unz editorial line

    All that Jews need to do to correct any confusion on the part of their critics is to open yeshivas to non-Jews, complete with full instruction, so that they can learn the ultra secretive Jewish religion in-full rather than to put it together from the outside.

    After all, why all of the secrets and esoterism? What is there to hide, exactly?

    Though, given what we do know I doubt that the Jews will be open to teaching non-Jews that Jews refer to them as non-human animals slated for slavery or genocide (depending on the passage) and that the Jewish religion is literally centered on a plan for world rule.

    • 回复: @AaronB
  74. AaronB 说:
    @j2

    Zionism was ostensibly secular, yes, for the most part. But it was also highly idealistic, communistic, and it was derived from the religion, so it clearly had a religious dimension.

    Purely secular people would never have the motivation, courage, and self sacrifice to pull something like that off – they’d be hedonistic, individualistic, consumers.

    But yes, whether they derived more inspiration from the bible or Talmud is rather a moot point.

  75. AaronB 说:
    @Anon

    Lol, there’s nothing secretive. We’re not Druze.

    As a non-Jew, you’re welcome to visit yeshivas and sit in on lectures.

    Plus, if you convert, you will receive full orthodox Jewish instruction, where all the “secrets” will be revealed 🙂

    Jews have their crazies and their fundamentalists and their just plain bad people too. I’m sure you’ll find your garden variety racists who believe gentiles are slated to be slaves to Jews, although I personally never knew anyone who said that, and it’s obviously against the spirit of the religion.

    • 回复: @refl
  76. Anon[110]• 免责声明 说:
    @anonymous

    Islam arrogates itself a similar mission, but here it becomes openly militaristc : Islam has to conquer the world (“for Allah” of course).

    You think screaming “thief” will obfuscate your own thievery?

    Where did we steal? We occupy Europe, our new homelands after we were pushed out of central Asian origin by East Asiatic hordes, and we occupy two and one half continents that were only inhabited by a bunch of roving pre-civilizational cannibals who would have been genocided ad completely erased by the Chinese if they had first arrived.

    Whereas Islamic Arabs and Turks took the Levant, Iran, Pakistan, North Africa, Spain, and one of our tribe’s original homelands in Anatolia. All civilized lands before the high number, low resource sand niggers with their Jewish programming invaded to take them from us and the Dravidians whom we had prior left in India.

    The Muslims or the Supremacist Pagan Polytheist Mangods-Worshipping Whitey Christians?

    Reading you write Jewish bullshit in our language is like watching a mindless monkey attempt to mimic human behavior. Literally nothing that you think or write is your own.

    [更多]

    But, as I have said before, Islam will indeed “conquer” the world… not militaristically as you put it most deceitfully (you are a lowlife), but simply by espousing the truth of its Monotheism.

    You don’t even understand your pseudo-faith because you don’t understand its Judaic root.

    “Monotheism” is nothing more than a metaphysical concept for tribal imperialism. It literally means nothing more. It’s the worship of the “one tribe”. “God” only being a metaphysical concept for this tribe’s power, in the faith of your Judaic root. Even the Jews know and state that every tribe has its own God.

    Your religion is foundation-free without Judaism. It literally defines you. Because sand niggers are so consistently over-zealous morons (my personal experience even apart from religion), you were programmed with the most militant aspects of Judaism but everything else is a pale shadow. In the coming apocalypse, and after you do your homicidal and demonic work of participating in the worldwide mass genocide, the Jews state that you will all be genocided. They are exactly correct.

    You people are mindless robots. Over-emotional and over-zealous to the point that you don’t even care about the root of your religion or what it actually means. You can be wound up to commit mass murder easier than Africans. That is you. Stupid, murderous, sub-human automatons who don’t eve know why you do what you do. You are slated for genocide for that exact reason.

    Abandon your Jewish programmed pseudo-faith now and you might survive. Do not abandon it and the texts state that you absolutely will not survive.

    The following simple truth will prevail over all mankind, and all pagan peoples will in time humbly submit to it, on their own accord.

    说:“他是真主,[是] 一,真主,永恒的避难所。 他既不生也不出生,对他来说也没有任何等价物。” 古兰经 112

    Is that the “simple truth”, you intellect free sand nigger? You can’t even be bothered to study the source of your own religion. You can not prove to me that your statement is the “truth” because you can’t explain what it even means. You are being wound up for murder and will be murdered for your animal efforts.

    Yeah, like no one knows about the terrorist buddhist monk scumbags in Burma, Sri Lanka, etc.?

    Please. Islam is not fooling the world with your claims of victimhood anywhere in the world. The sane world literally hates you with every fiber of its rational soul, as it would any retard-level rabid murderous nigger who doesn’t even know that he is a willing tool of a psychopath.

    We know what you did to India, the Levant, Iran, and Anatolia and you are doing the same thing in the nations that you mention. Islam has zero claim to nor place in a single one of those nations. You are the militant arm of Judaism and its harvest and nothing more. The Buddhists should ship every last Islamist out of those nations and unapologetically imprison anyone who will not leave. Death for those who will not leave after that. No Islamist can protest the death penalty with a straight face. You, yourselves, use it so haphazardly as the low IQ, Jewish-golem, sand-nigger-barbarians that you are.

    Enjoy your hallucinatory world, pagan… for it will not last, I promise you.

    Says the Jewish monkey who cannot comprehend his own programming. Please keep the threats coming so that not a single one of us, down to the last woman, feels remorse when your usefulness to the Jews is complete.

    • 回复: @BengaliCanadianDude
  77. @anonymous

    “…Who actually has been trying to conquer the world in our current reality..?”

    Good, and who has been trying to conquer the world in our past reality? Look at this map :

    How did that happen ? Not peacefully. Pure violent imperialism. If you think imperialism is so bad, then why is Islamic imperialism not bad too ? Why divide the world into 伊斯兰堡达尔哈布 ? Last time I checked, har means “war” and not “peace”.

    Should I mention that the Muslims took female captives and were allowed to use them as sex slaves ? The permission for this abhorrent crime came from no other than “Allah” himself (yes, your famous “pure monotheistic” god, good old “Allah”) in sura 4 :24 :

    “Also (prohibited are) women already married, except those whom your right hand possess”.

    “Whom your right hand possess” means female captives or slaves. We “unbelievers” call such a thing “rape”. That is your “noble” religion Islam, “revealed” by “Allah”.

    伊斯兰教是 流氓 religion, just like Judaism, but of a violent and less cunning sort. Both should be outlawed by the UN.

  78. anonymous[224]• 免责声明 说:

    The title, Israel as One MAN, says it all.

    What all of these religious comparisons between sky gods and materialistic gods share is that they blindly omit and/or condemn the life-giving essence of Nature and Woman. The tree grows fruit, not for its own benefit, but offers it as a gift to the next evolutionary stage of life and all sentient beings. What gifts are we preparing for the next evolutionary stage of life? Nothing! We aren’t even planning a world for the next seven generations, only the present generation.

    Neoliberalism has been thoroughly discredited as an economic policy because it was derived in sociopathic self-interest. This deeply ingrained patriarchal mentality that women are somehow inferior and feminine values are weak, therefore worthless, is what is running the western world right now.

    We need to salvage the remains of a society ravaged by the dangerous and deeply flawed ideology of the past 40 years, which has an end goal of rolling the whole world back to a time where no basic human rights and protections existed.

    The major flaw of Neoliberalism:

    John Nash (A Beautiful Mind) put forward a game theoretic formulation which argued that a system driven purely by self-interest could maintain equilibrium as everyone’s self interest would be balanced by everyone else’s

    Nash won a Nobel Prize in economics

    His most famous game was called “Fuck You Buddy” where the only way to win was to betray your opponent

    Reinforced priority of competition and irrelevance of cooperation for personal or group strategies

    Paranoid schizophrenia was later acknowledged as a cause of this excessively individualistic approach to social relations

    Yet, a whole global economic system continues based on the mental illness of one of its major theorists.

    Even before John Nash, Friedrich von Hayek, an Austrian economist considered the father of neoliberalism, did not believe in social justice or anything ‘public’. A fascist by any other name.

    Today, we are seeing the effects of privatization of everything, the ‘greed is good’ mantra of fellow libertarian Milton Friedman that has taken predatory capitalism repeatedly beyond the brink of disaster. It has become THE threat to humankind and the natural environment.

    Perhaps the only woman respected by the leaders of today is Ayn Rand.

    “The famed right-wing author found early inspiration in 1920’s murderer William Hickman.
    There’s something deeply unsettling about living in a country where millions of people froth at the mouth at the idea of giving health care to the tens of millions of Americans who don’t have it, or who take pleasure at the thought of privatizing and slashing bedrock social programs like Social Security or Medicare. It might not be so hard to stomach if other Western countries also had a large, vocal chunk of the population that thought like this, but the U.S. is seemingly the only place where right-wing elites can openly share their distaste for the working poor. Where do they find their philosophical justification for this kind of attitude?

    It turns out, you can trace much of this thinking back to Ayn Rand, a popular cult-philosopher who exerts a huge influence over much of the right-wing and libertarian crowd, but whose influence is only starting to spread out of the U.S.

    One reason most countries don’t find the time to embrace Ayn Rand’s thinking is that she is a textbook sociopath. In her notebooks Ayn Rand worshiped a notorious serial murderer-dismemberer, and used this killer as an early model for the type of “ideal man” she promoted in her more famous books.”

    https://www.alternet.org/2015/01/how-ayn-rand-became-big-admirer-serial-killer/

    At 4:30 in the video clip below, Dr. Mate describes Trump as a traumatized individual, but that same description of this Cluster B personality disorder can be applied to all those who display self-aggrandizement, exceptionalism, “being chosen”, supremacism, toxic masculinity, etc. They blame others for showing signs of weakness rather than examining their own insecurity.

    To then slather on awards like candy to celebrate this dysfunctional behavior and justify its “normality” is to perpetuate and deepen the chasm between Nature and Man.

    https://www.youtube.com/attribution_link?a=WUl7f2xs_4M&u=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DuR07OtEhKPE%26feature%3Dshare&fbclid=IwAR3kTm878TyywlE1ipR1M69Vlskoa_eUzjn5rdlSigCMUA2SVUbHi_Hy2bA

    Imagine if the human body adopted a neoliberal system of operation, when cells compete against one another for survival. There’s a name for that. We call it cancer.

    • 同意: utu
  79. anon[210]• 免责声明 说:
    @Laurent Guyénot

    Is not Kohelet (Ecclesiastes) part of the Ketuvim, which is a part of the Tanakh (Hebrew Bible), which is traditionally read annually during Sukkot (Feast of Tabernacles)? I understand there was controversy about including Ecclesiastes in the Hebrew Bible, much like there was controversy about James and Revelation being included in the New Testament.

    At any rate, the Preacher in Ecclesiastes does not believe in the afterlife. 职业陌生人 is being disingenuous in quoting it. Whatever soul man and his fellow animals may have look forward to “the same fate,” with “no further reward” and “no advantage” over a dead dog.

    Ecclesiastes 3:19-21 Surely the fate of human beings is like that of the animals; the same fate 等待着他们两个:一个人死了,另一个人也死了。 都一样的气息; 人类有 没有优势 over animals. All go to the 一样的地方; all come from dust, and to dust all return. Who knows if the human spirit rises upward and if the spirit of the animal goes down into the earth?”

    传道书9:5-10因为活着的人知道他们会死,而死者却一无所知。 他们有 没有进一步的奖励,甚至他们的名字也被遗忘了……在死者的王国里,你要去的地方,没有工作,没有计划,也没有知识或智慧。

    Furthermore, this bit of commentary on the book of Job enforces your viewpoint on Judaic interpretation of the afterlife.

    My purpose is to discuss these questions and show that the author of Job methodically uses “death as extinction” in his logical arguments, but reverts to the popular concept of Sheol in his emotional ruminations and outbursts.

    Aron Pinker (2007) Job’s Perspective on Death. Jewish Bible Quarterly.
    http://jbq.jewishbible.org/assets/Uploads/352/352_Deathjob.pdf

    • 回复: @Professional Stranger
  80. This is a very intriguing article and I would say that it certainly lays out a solid historical framework for grasping the depth of understanding needed to see contemporary reality and affect change within it. However, there is something that doesn’t appear to fit. Why would the parasite willingly destroy its host? What kind of host is a destroyed nation of migrants going to be? I find it hard to believe that a movement this deep would be making mistakes, but they also seem to be running everything into a dead end.

    • 回复: @follyofwar
    , @ThreeCranes
  81. anon[210]• 免责声明 说:
    @anonymous

    异教徒 is Latin for “villager, rustic,” but effeminate city-slickers refer to them as lowlifes. Listening now to Beethoven’s (beet-farmer) Symphony No. 6 in F major, Op. 68, 牧师 and realizing how lowly rural folks are perceived by overly domesticated pussies like yourself.

  82. Check the tale of the scorpion and the frog.

    The explanation is that the will to destruction is in the scorpion’s nature.

  83. S 说:

    A Program For the Jews (1939) – Harry Waton

    ‘Abraham, Jacob, Isaac, Moses, and all the rest continue to live in the Jewish people, and in due time they will live in the whole human race.’

    The New Rome (1853) – Theodore Poesche and Charles Goepp

    pg 104

    ‘All the world are now Jews..’

    I’ve come across this thought before in other places.

    If it is the case that everyone is already in reality Jewish, myself included, as Poesche and Goepp claimed in their 1853 book 新罗马 why is it that I and everyone else can’t simply move to the Jewish state of Israel right now, immediately claim citizenship, and have the claim respected?

    Is it perhaps that Goepp and Poesche, despite being quite correct in many of their other geo-political assertions, were mistaken in this?

    Regarding Waton’s claim that at some time in the future everyone will in effect be Jewish, how exactly is this to come about and manifest?

    Is it via inter-marriage where after numerous generations, possibly taking a very long time indeed, that everyone will have a biological Jewish mother?

    If so, is that all that different in substance from what the Han Chinese are doing to the Tibetans by flooding Tibet with Chinese ‘immigrants’ and biologically ‘mixing’ them away, ie genociding them?

    Someone might say not so, but then doesn’t most every group when they engage in this sort of thing rationalize it away by telling themselves a variant of it not being about power, but rather, it’s a heaven approved mission to ‘civilize’ this or that ‘barbaric’ group of people.

    Or, that it’s all just ‘a natural progression’, when it’s not ‘natural’ at all, nor necessarily ‘progress’.

    Is it perhaps in addition to this that everyone is to become Jewish by educational means? Or, by the adherance to what are referred to as the Noahide laws?

    If so, will these future converted Jewish people be fully accepted as Jewish by other Jewish folks, or, will they as some assert is in reality often the case with conversion, not be truly accepted, and be ‘second class’?

    [更多]

    Is this all that different when Anglo-Saxons or Russians in the past attempted to Anglicize or Russify various peoples, Jewish amongst them?

    They thought they were absolutely right in their ‘mission’ to do so, though generally it tended to make a bigger mess of things. The biggest mess of all it seems is made when one group attempts to simply biologically genocide the other.

    Or, is it the case with the Jewish people, that unlike every other past people throughout history, that they have absolute truth and its proper interpretation on their side, despite what their own holy books have told them of past error on their part?

    Of course, too, there are no doubt individuals, likely many, as well as peoples, who ultimately for whatever reason, may not wish to be Jewish. Would Mr Waton, were he still alive, immediately conclude in such a situation that such persons and peoples ‘hated’ both him and Judaism. Would he be okay with his people via what is sometimes referred to as ‘organized Jewry declaring ‘war’ on such individuals and peoples?

    If that were Mr Waton’s response, would it be possible that he was the ‘hater’ and not the other way around?

    A person might say, okay then, this or that people might simply withdraw from the present order and be done with it. It’s not that easy though. The Chinese and Japanese, whom historically as ‘insular’ peoples already were separate, wished to be left alone, and by and large leave others be, a seeming ideal model, have since the 19th century been by force of arms (ie violence), or threat of the same, forced to join in.

    Similarly, the fate of modern Germany is not encouraging.

    The Germans, albeit imperfectly (whose perfect?) and with continental ambitions in Europe and Eurasia, attempted to separate their destiny from that of the Jewish people living in Germany. Once achieving some small steps in this area, they had war declared upon them almost immediately by the global Jewish community (1933).

    By the Fall of 1941 [Sept 1939, UK declaration of war upon Germany/Fall 1941, US ‘undeclared naval war’ with Germany and ‘Lend Lease’ violations of neutrality and international law] the entire US/UK bloc, with truly global ambitions of obtaining total world power (see the ‘New Rome’ book linked below) and which had long targeted Germany for conquest, was effectively at war with Germany. Everyone knows the ultimate result of the war.

    [The Anglo-Saxons, since the time of Cromwell, and with their unfortunate British and American Israelism ideology, have long had a dysfunctional relationship with the Jewish people. Those adhering to the British Israelism ideology, Queen Elizabeth for one it is said, have quite literally (somehow) thought they were of the ‘Lost Tribes of Israel’. The relationship is ultimately bad and unhealthy for both peoples I submit. If a person thinks that, what is at best in part a quazi co-dependence and submerging of identity, and being a part of such a relationship, is all healthy and good, they might differ.]

    Let’s leave Germany, Japan, and China wholly aside.

    If hypothetically a people wishes for whatever reason to wholly separate themselves from another, and ‘perfectly’ does so, though to be sure no one’s perfect, ie pay’s off every dime of debt to them, compensates them fairly (market rates) for property ‘nationalized’, and being sure they have a ‘homeland’, if not at minimum a reasonably safe and comfortable place to depart to, when asked finally to physically leave, is that ‘hate’ or, rather simply the exercise of a natural right?

    If John wished to end what in his view was an unproductive and unhealthy relationship with Sally, and do so amicably as much as is possible, is that hate on John’s part? Is John therefore ‘anti-Sally’ in attempting to do so?

    And what could be said of Sally if she didn’t accept this expressed desire of John’s to end the relationship, not only refusing to leave him, but instead accusing him publicly, and to various legal authorities besides, of doing all sorts of mean spirited and physically violent things to her, even attempting to murder her, though many of these claims may well ultimately prove to be greatly exaggerated, if they are even true at all?

    John for his part bitterly makes his own accusations against Sally, and who can say ultimately how many of the counter-accusations are entirely true?

    Broadly, the historic relationship between the Jewish and various European peoples has been a lot like those presented on old television sitcoms from the 1950’s and 60’s, where the ‘relationship’ between a husband and wife literally consist of perpetual arguing and, or throwing dishes at each other the entire time.

    One or the other might leave briefly, ie for a night or a few days, but sure enough they are soon back together again, and back to continuous fighting. On these old TV shows, with their canned laugh tracks, they attempt to present such situations as funny, but of course in actual fact it’s not. Such ‘marriages’ are in reality ‘made in hell’, and to the extent those much like them sadly do indeed occur, such men and women in such a ‘relationship’ should likely never have married each other in the first place.

    The answer to such obviously poisonous and unsustainable relationships for both parties , before one kills the other, is to divorce.

    Short of a (preferably amicable) real, and true separation, ideally agreed to by both parties, it’s all too often that murder suicides take place. Or, almost as bad, the Fatal Attraction scenario, where one party forceably and ‘permanently’ ends the ‘relationship’. The latter two scenarios certainly aren’t ‘best practice’.

    I’d be curious as to people’s thoughts on this overall subject.

    https://majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/the_new_rome_or_the_united_states_of_the_world_1853

  84. follyofwar 说:
    @Laurent Guyénot

    Very interesting. I had no idea that Clark was Jewish on his father’s side. Per Wikipedia, Benjamin died when Wesley was age 3. His mother was Methodist, and she did not tell Wesley of his Jewish ancestry. On his 16th birthday, he was adopted by his step-father, Viktor Clark, and had his surname officially changed, with Kanne becoming his middle name.

    • 回复: @Laurent Guyénot
  85. Art 说:
    @Baxter

    What is the ultimate ‘sin’ a Jew can commit?

    Go to jail.

    Screw someone real good – make a killing – and not go jail – is the ultimate Jew achievement (even other Jews).

    p.s. 9/11 Larry has to be the ultimate number one Jew – the ink on the insurance contracts was not even dry – and those buildings free fell in nine seconds – what a guy!

    • 同意: Robert Dolan
  86. @anon

    Stranger wrote in Comment 47 (towards the bottom): The fact that 2 of the 3 quotes above are both from Ecclesiastes, yet give different answers, just goes to show you: the last verse(12) of Ecclesiastes was added by a later editor to make it politically correct.

    Anon 210: the Preacher in Ecclesiastes does not believe in the afterlife. Professional Stranger is being disingenuous in quoting it.

    You miss the point. The question under discussion is: “Is the Hebrew Bible materialistic?”, and WHO put it the verse in the Hebrew Bible, or WHO agrees with it, has got nothing to do with it. It point is simply that IT IS IN the Hebrew bible. And that’s all it takes to answer the question with a definitive “NO”!

    ______
    Folk myths improve with with time, with little additions and improvements, ancient and modern.

    Another example from Ecclesiastes:
    Ecclesiastes “all is vanity” (vanity = הֶבֶל hebel) A more literally correct translation is “all is nothing” or “everything is useless” – as found in some translations. But “all is vanity” is a big improvement, it adds a new level of meaning.

    “All is vanity” has come to mean “all is ego”, as in this famous illusion painting (Charles Gilbert 1892). Is it a young woman preening herself at her vanity mirror, or is it a gruesome skull?]]

    The original Hebrew word translated as “vanity” (hebel הֶבֶל) means “vapor” not “puffed-up pride and vanity” or “ego”.

    Folk myths grow and evolve over time, same as country folk music. The “holy” books are only folk myths. Don’t try to freeze them. Let them evolve. Same goes for “all is VANITY”. It has improved with time. Like old whiskey.

  87. follyofwar 说:
    @Roger Smith

    Excellent points, Roger. The Big Jews already have total dominance of the USA, but it’s not enough for them. Now, with the help of their useful idiots at Google, they are going after our First Amendment, making it illegal to even criticize Israel. They’ve been trying to take down the Second for some time now. With their money, they own both political parties

    Where does this all end? Christianity, it seems, has been defeated, with the majority in the US being Christian Zionists (quite an oxymoron). Few Catholics, outside of E Michael Jones, have the courage to take them on. Even the current Pope is a Zionist.

    • 同意: Robert Dolan
  88. Much of Jewish history is about a weak people with a strong God surrounded by strong peoples with weak gods.

    In more modern times, it’s been about people with weak bodies but strong minds surrounded by peoples with strong bodies but weak minds. In the end, the minds win over body. Man controls horse, not vice versa.

  89. “judaism remains a rather down-to-earth religion & its early concepts are similar to those we can find in the Epic of Gilgamesh & Homer: when you die, your psyche, which is just a shadow without vital energy, goes somewhere under the earth crust (Sheol, Hades) & leads there an unenviable “existence” of a devitalized semi-conscious entity (see Odyssey’s visit to Achilles).”

    When limted to the Torah as the author so desires, this is a mighty thread worn posit.

  90. Dumbo 说:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    This is a strange belief & I don’t get how people came to it. It seems more natural, for a primitive mind, that there is some force giving you life, and after you die- it dissipates or evaporates like a mist, and there is the end to all individual existence. Why an anemic shadow would persist somewhere in an underground pit is a mystery, at least to me.

    It makes much more sense to believe in a continuation of existence of the individual, however it may happen, than it ceasing completely.

    Historical Christianity remains otherworldly & pessimistic,

    Otherworldly, I guess so, pessimistic, it depends how you view it. Chesterton said it is both very pessimistic and very optimistic.

    similar to Islam (which also affirms Heaven & Hell, but is, like Judaism, more oriented toward taboos on food & other elements of behavior).

    Yes, both religions are obsessed with minute points of behavior, from how to eat to how to … anything, while Christianity evolved into something more interesting with time. Jesus himself was many times preaching against the Oral Law and against an overtly literal or blind following of laws (see his points about Shabbath, woman in the well, adulterous woman, etc).

  91. Milton 说:

    The Church Fathers stated that before the Second Coming there would arrive a individual who would be accepted by the Synagogue of Satan (modern-day Zionists) as the Jewish Messiah. Not the suffering Messiah, but rather the same type of messiah that the Zealots of Christ’s day were expecting: a political, military messiah. A man in the mold of Simon bar Giora, Eleazar ben Simon, and John of Giscala. A man in the mold of the wicked rulers of Israel: Ahab, Manasseh, Jehoram. But the Church Fathers also were adamant that coinciding with the reign of the Antichrist will be the arrival of the Two Witnesses, Enoch and Elijah, who never died but have been supernaturally preserved for their ministry against the Antichrist. When these Two Witnesses return in supernatural, public fashion, there will no longer doubt about God’s existence from the “God is a Delusion” crowd. Humanity and Israel will face a stark choice: embrace the true Messiah or follow after the Antichrist. I firmly believe that the signs of the times point to the imminent arrival of these two blessed witnesses. History is about to be made. Stay tuned!

  92. niteranger 说:
    @Robert Dolan

    The author is correct. Judaism is all about what you can plunder on earth and it clearly shows in the business, economic, and social practices of Jews from prostitution, organ selling, drugs, money lenders, and their other penchants of deception against the goy.

    This is by far and away the finest analysis of the Jewish problem I have ever read. The author nailed it and Ron is to be commended for publishing it.

    • 同意: Robert Dolan
  93. sheliak 说:
    @Moi

    Completely incorrect interpretation of Christ’s position within Islamic theology.

  94. @Ilya G Poimandres

    who and what can sop the Jews….the Chinese and Chinese global power?

    I cant see the Jews doing to the Chinese what they have done to european/american/canadian whites…an to negroes everywhere. in to the Chinese addition there are Iran, Korea..both halves etc. a huge part of oriental asia: these can deal with the Jews.

    India cant’t deal with the Zionists! India is one huge patsy of a nation in the face of the white skin. Indians/India have no defense against the Khazars..period.

    it is quite likely that after America Khazaria will get the Indians to initiate a destruction between themselves and the Chinese, leaving the rest of the world safe for Khazar control. it is my opinion that India is the next host for the parasite to use to further its plan for the world, as the USA dies on its economic feet.

    the Khazar target is China, and who best to do that job for the Khazars but the Indians?

    I don’t think the Jews are very worried about Russia. Russians have reconstituted themselves nicely from their Soviet fall, and interim Zionist exploitation that fall led to. but the Zionists clearly have enough influence over Russia to almost dictate Russian policy in Syria relative to Israel. that and the strength of the Russian fifth column inside Russia itself, must literally assure the Khazars of restoration of Zionist power over all of Russia almost as soon as Putin goes home.

    and if not as soon as that surely in time the Jews will control Russia again. I don’t see how Russia can avoid becoming such control at some future point. the problem for the Zionists therefor are Iran/China and most of Oriental Asia. the Indians will take care of that for the Zionist, while conveniently costing themselves their own existence..solving that problem for the Zionist at the same time

  95. @AaronB

    But the Jewish religion itself is concerned with the spiritual salvation of all of mankind

    嗯。

    OK, but he was just some random crank, right?

    Nope — Yosef was the Sephardi Chief Rabbi of Israel.

    他在耶路撒冷的葬礼是以色列历史上最大的葬礼,估计出席了850,000人。

    http://www.timesofisrael.com/jerusalem-closes-down-for-rabbi-ovadia-yosefs-funeral/

    Benjamin Netanyahu: “The Jewish people have lost one of the wisest men of this generation.”

    Shimon Peres: “When I pressed his hand, I felt I was touching history, and when I kissed his head, it was as though I kissed the very greatness of Israel.”

    “Spiritual salvation of all mankind.” I see.

    • 回复: @AaronB
    , @anon
  96. @Robert Dolan

    We live in hope..

    I’ve some familiarity with Jewish thought so what I’ve read thus far of M. Guyénot’s article is not a complete surprise… That said? This article is one of the most appalling indictments I’ve ever read…

    But also: That the birth of Christianity and its message of universal love and brotherhood could arise from such a pestilential source must surely be proof of the existence of God..

    • 回复: @JP
  97. AaronB 说:
    @James Forrestal

    Not every individual or generation lives up to the spirit of that religion.

    Christianity says turn the other cheek, but several centuries later developed the Inquisition, the Crusades, the massacre of Cathars, the religious wars of the 16th century, the massacre of the Hugenots, the destruction and massacre of Aztec and Inca civilization, with Popes formally granting European countries “ownership” of parts of the Americas, the burning of witches, the sanctioning of slavery, and much more.

    And yet does the failure of generations of Christians deprive Christianity of its essential moral character? It does not, in my view. While these things occurred, it cannot reasonably be said that they characterize the message of Jesus – yet for detractors, they do.

    In the Hebrew Bible it says all men were made in the Divine image, and that Israel’s special mission was to be a witness to God among the nations, and that non Jews who recognize God and act morally have a share in heaven.

    But you will characterize Judaism by some crazy remarks by a modern Rabbi who is known for making crazy remarks? He also said, btw, that the Jews who died in the Holocaust died because they were the souls of sinners who deserved to die. That hardly endears him to Jews.

    He’s considered a great Rabbi in Israel despite his history of offensive statements, not because of them, and because he did much good work in other areas. And btw, that remark about gentiles was condemned by the ADL and lots of other Jews.

    • 回复: @ThreeCranes
  98. Art 说:
    @AaronB

    Ethnocentrism is not a “naturalistic” fact.

    Only people who have supernatural beliefs can be ethnocentric.

    真的吗?

    Ethnocentric is a fancy word for tribe. Tribes have been with humanity forever. Most all tribes have some mutual god figure tied to natural causes.

    As we leave behind tribalism and individualistic gods, thing get better – PERIOD.

    Science is the new religion – it leads us to a rational beginning. And it leads us to an idealistic philosophy.

    思考和平-艺术

    • 回复: @anon
  99. anon[222]• 免责声明 说:
    @Robert Dolan

    • R. Dolan: The jews are no longer God’s chosen people
    • Jew Testament: “The people of Israel, chosen.” (Romans 9:4)

    Who’s right, you or the Holy Hook?

    • 回复: @Robert Dolan
  100. Seraphim 说:
    @Professional Stranger

    @“Ecclesiastes is not even part of the Tanakh”

    Guyénot should have abstained to make such statements which show his actual lack of familiarity (not to say ignorance) with the subject. It puts all his allegations on a very shaky ground. His waffling about the role of Christianity in the demise of Christendom shows that he did not understand much about Christianity and its ‘conflict’ with Judaism.
    He actually tries to mitigate his hostility to it, despite his perfunctory exculpation of “Russian Orthodox Christianity today” for its supposed ‘strong national flavor’ (of which he doesn’t know much, as of Orthodoxy in general). The truth is that all theorizations of ‘volkisch’ nationalisms (German in particular) are imitations of Judaism, as all ‘Arian’ (‘white’) fantasies à la Gobineau and Houston Chamberlain, actually hostile to the Church and no less ‘materialistic’ than Judaism.

    • 回复: @Laurent Guyénot
  101. @Roger Smith

    The point isn’t to destroy the host, it’s to blind it and numb its capacity to think. The ideal host works tirelessly day after day and remembers nothing. It doesn’t even remember that it has been performing the same task for years. Each day, it believes, is its first day on the job. It has been lobotomized by drugs.

    When a worker becomes habituated to the drug and his consciousness begins to work its way towards the light, like a stem of grass through asphalt, then he must either be reeducated or, if that fails, washed out of the system entirely.

    So, once you become conscious, if you want to stay alive, you must camouflage yourself by pretending that this day is your first day on the job and hope that somehow, somewhere, you will encounter another being like yourself who too has woken up.

    But you must be careful. The person to whom you confide your revelations may turn you in. Then, without threat or force they will separate you by telling you that you qualify for a special program reserved for gold-star workers. You will be feted as they parade you past the other workers. In reality they are escorting you to the recycle bin.

  102. anon[222]• 免责声明 说:
    @James Forrestal

    Jew Testament will tell you the same thing as this foul Rabbi. “因为如果外邦人分享了犹太人的属灵祝福, 他们欠犹太人 与他们分享他们的物质祝福。” (Romans 15:27) Pay up Christcucks, Buy-bull says so!

  103. Art 说:
    @Robert Dolan

    I am struck by the idea that judaism is pure materialism and rejects the idea of an afterlife.

    So….if there is no reward in heaven for good behavior, and no punishment in hell for bad behavior…..well, you see where this is going.

    This supports the particularist philosophy that jews do “what is good for the jews” and to hell with the rest of humanity.

    Really – is it good for the Jews?

    Do the sins of the father fall on the son.

    The Big Jew Rothschilds screwed over Europe with debt – the Little Jews in Germany paid the price.

    For 2,000 years the Little Jews have been held back by the crimes of the Big Jews. The Big Jews just move, taking the money – the Little Jews get the hell.

    不要伤害—艺术

    • 回复: @Robert Dolan
  104. @anon

    我是正确的。

    First of all, that is not the KJV translation.

    Second, Paul is talking about the PAST, and the OT.

    Yes, the jews WERE the chosen people in the OT.

    Christ came to save the jews, then when they rejected Him,
    God offered salvation to all of mankind.

    The NT is a new deal, a new covenant, open to jews and gentiles.

    “Israel” and “Jerusalem” in the NT generally refer to spiritual Israel
    (heavenly Israel) and not the 1948 Israel of the flesh.

    Technically…..Christians are now God’s chosen people, but Christian humility,
    and jewish brainwashing, have cucked Christians into becoming zionist lunatics.

    The idea that jews are STILL “God’s chosen people” after they KILLED THE SON OF GOD,
    is so stupid I have to give the jews credit for having balls the size of grapefruits
    to keep pushing that kind of outrageous bullshit.

    • 回复: @anon
  105. @anonymous

    We can have monotheism without the knock off religions based on Judaism. Islam can conquer the world but it is based on a false history. Abraham isn’t the father of the Arabs. Why would anyone want to be descended from a probable rapist anyway? We will never be free from this evil until people stop believing in these false myths. We have Deism, we have Zoroastrianism which is the real living father of monotheism along with the long deceased Egyptian Atenism. Why remain spiritual slaves to someone else’s story?

    I’m going to say somethings that is real racist but according to my current understanding I believe it to be true. Did Western Europeans and Arabs adopt the psychopathic Jewish God because they were too stupid to come up with something captivating to believe in themselves? These people were late intellectual bloomers according to World History and I doubt they would have accomplished anything of note without standing on the shoulders of the Greco-Roman giants that came before them. Western Europeans have left us very little regarding their indigenous religions (I wonder if they were just copies of other and older pagan religions?) and strangely Muslims are monotheistic but they worship a pagan rock. World History pretty much ignores them until more recent times. These two groups have no great living indigenous religions like the Hindu, Buddhist, Taoist, or Zoroastrians have. In world history these people never contributed anything meaningful until recently. People study ancient Greek philosophy and not something some German tribal sage said 3,000 years ago.

  106. anon[222]• 免责声明 说:
    @Art

    > As we leave behind tribalism

    You’re an utter moron, Art, and an unscientific one at that. Humans naturally organize on tribal levels because of our brain’s neocortex size. Never heard of Dunbar’s Number? Real simple:

    “Group size is found to be a function of relative neocortical volume…”

    Robin Dunbar (1992). “Neocortex size as a constraint on group size in primates.” Journal of Human Evolution 22 (6): pp. 469–493

    You may as well speak of abandoning traditional digestion or traditional reproduction as another glorious leap forward.

    > thing get better – PERIOD.

    You’re so certain of the progressive narrative that you have to shout at everybody with all caps.

    • 回复: @Art
  107. Justsaying 说:
    @joeshittheragman

    Well said. In addition to being a narrow matrilineal tribalistic cult, self-promoting & self-serving to the strict exclusion of all goyim.

  108. @Art

    No……it wasn’t the jews that paid the price……..it was FIFTY FIVE MILLION

    GENTILES THAT PAID THE PRICE.

    • 回复: @Art
  109. anon[222]• 免责声明 说:
    @Robert Dolan

    First of all, no translation has special magical properties. Second of all, the Jew Testament doesn’t say what you say it says, it just says what it says. Fanatical all-caps shouting doesn’t change that.

    > zionist lunatics

    Who else but zionist fanatics wrote the Jew Testament? Have you ever actually read it?

    •马太福音21:5“对女儿说 锡安,“瞧,你的国王来找你。”
    •约翰福音12:15“女儿,不要害怕 锡安; 瞧,你的国王来了。”
    •罗马书9:33 锡安 一块石头…”
    •罗马书11:26 锡安......“
    •希伯来书12:22 锡安,到永生神的城-天上的耶路撒冷。”
    •彼得前书1:2 锡安设立的区域办事处外,我们在美国也开设了办事处,以便我们为当地客户提供更多的支持。“
    •启示录14:1 锡安,还有他144,000。”

    • 回复: @Robert Dolan
    , @Titus
  110. Anon 2 说:

    OT Poland thrashed Israel 4:0 in Euro 2020 soccer qualifiers.
    Sic transit gloria mundi. Why are the Jews unable to put up
    a better fight?

  111. Seraphim 说:
    @BengaliCanadianDude

    Hasbara troll masquerading as KKK ‘Whitey’.

  112. @anon

    I laid it out for you, dipshit.

    My analysis is correct.

    I have at least 40 IQ points on you, and years of theological study.

    • 回复: @anon
  113. @Jake

    Like you say, the problem is the Talmud but the problem is also the old testament because it has tied whites to the Jews and helped to deracinate us. Blaming the Talmud for the Jews is the
    right wing Christian way or at least maybe the Western Christian way(as opposed to the EasternOrthodox Christian way) to hang onto the Hebrew Bible. Laurent Guyenot wrote an excellent essay about this appropriately called “The Hook” not long ago. It is right here on this site. You should read it.

    • 回复: @Seraphim
  114. Art 说:
    @Robert Dolan

    The Big Jew Rothschilds screwed over Europe with debt – the Little Jews in Germany paid the

    价钱。

    No……it wasn’t the jews that paid the price……..it was FIFTY FIVE MILLION

    GENTILES THAT PAID THE PRICE.

    一个很好的点!

  115. Art 说:
    @anon

    As we leave behind tribalism and individualistic gods, thing get better – PERIOD.

    Group size is found to be a function of relative neocortical volume…”

    Group size?? Neocortical volume??

    Where did I mention group and brain size?

    p.s. I was thinking of you (222) – clearly – you needed the EMPHASIS!!!!!!!

    思考和平-艺术

    • 回复: @anon
  116. Rodop 说:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    OK, can you give me some examples of “pseudo-science, degenerated culture”

    • 回复: @Franklin Ryckaert
  117. @Seraphim

    Yes, I should have abstained from that statement. And yes, my understanding is limited. And Yes, I learn much from comments on unz.com. So thank you for correcting me. I actually made a confusion, in my answer to comment #4, between 传教士 西拉赫 (叫 L’Ecclesiastique in French, a source of confusion). But my argument remains valid. Ecclesiast, though written in Hebrew and included in the Tanakh, belongs to the Hellenistic period, according to most scholars (the Persian period, according to others). And besides, it is not a counter-argument to my thesis, on the contrary: it is fondamentally and explicitly materialistic. To set the record straight, I reproduce what I wrote in the article, which is correct:

    In the Hellenistic period, Greco-Egyptian dualism infiltrated Jewish thought. The Wisdom of Solomon, written in Greek in Alexandria in the first century BCE, asserts that, “God created human beings to be immortal,” and criticizes those who “do not believe in a reward for blameless souls” (2:22-23). But such books never made it into the Jewish canon, as rabbinical Judaism vigorously rejected anything Greek. Moreover, even within Hellenistic Judaism, the materialist viewpoint prevailed. According to Ecclesiastes,
    “人类的命运和动物的命运是一样的:一个人死了,另一个人死了; […]万物都来自尘土,万物又回到尘土中”(3:19-20)。
    “活人至少知道他们将要死,但死者一无所知。 […]在你要去的Sheol中,既没有成就,也没有计划,也没有科学,也没有智慧”(9:5-10)。

    In the quote mentionned by Professional Stranger in comment #4 from Ecclesiastes 12: “And the dust returns to the earth as it was, And the spirit returns to God who gave it,” the right translation for ruah is not “spirit” but “breath”.

  118. Seraphim 说:
    @Achilles Wannabe

    The ‘Eastern Orthodox Christian way’ hangs on the ‘Hebrew’ Bible as much as the Western.

  119. LondonBob 说:

    No Jews don’t believe in heaven and hell, I have discussed this was a religious Jewish friend.

    No the Puritans weren’t influenced by Jews, they had been expelled a long time ago. Indeed Jews play no role in British history until the Victorian era as they were expelled not so long after they came over with William the Conqueror. A peculiar Catholic obsession to link Puritans with Judaism.

  120. anon[222]• 免责声明 说:
    @Robert Dolan

    Yeah, you laid out your dipshit excuse-making for the Jew Testament, trying to twist it into saying exactly the opposite of what it says. Your creative interpretation of the Jew Testament isn’t an analysis. As far as IQ goes, the Jew Testament says the opposite; Paul states that Christcuck dupes are mostly ignoble idiots. “Not many of you were wise by human standards…not many were noble…” (1 Corinthians 1:26) Science confirms that part of the Buybull.

    “A meta-analysis of 63 studies showed a significant negative association between intelligence and religiosity.” –The Relation Between Intelligence and Religiosity: A Meta-Analysis and Some Proposed Explanations https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868313497266

  121. anon[222]• 免责声明 说:
    @Art

    Where did you mention group size? When you denounced the tribal. “Tribe” is by definition a smaller political group than a state. Thanks for proving just how intellectually challenged you are.

    By definition, a band was a small, egalitarian, kin-based group of perhaps 10–50 people, while a tribe comprised a number of bands that were politically integrated (often through a council of elders or other leaders) and shared a language, religious beliefs, and other aspects of culture.

    The Difference Between a Tribe and a Band
    https://www.britannica.com/topic/Difference-Between-a-Tribe-and-a-Band-1673365

    • 回复: @Art
  122. @follyofwar

    I know the story of Clark finding out late that his father was Jewish. But I suspect it was made up to justifcy his crypto-Zionism all along. In any case, as I have often said, I suspect that his oft-repeated story about the Pentagon memo is a trick to: 1) cryptically sign the new war as fufilling biblical prophecies, and 2) at the same time, blame it on “the Pentagon generals”. Like Democracy Now who interviewed him, he is a pseudo-whistelblower working for the the controlled opposition. I may be wrong, of course… But the point is: as the proud son of a long line of rabbis, he cannot ignore what the “seven nations” mean in the Bible.

  123. @AaronB

    “and that non Jews who recognize God and act morally have a share in heaven.”

    And the good Rabbi already made clear what that share will consist of, i.e. sweeping the floor, emptying the trash cans and swabbing out the chamber pots. Gee, thanks a lot for sharing.

    • 回复: @Caruthers
  124. @Jake

    The BOTTOM LINE: Jews ALWAYS seek is destruction of Jesus’ work and eradication of His followers.

    (((All subsets of Jews)))

    …always swirl widely and end up back on the same page, which first and foremost is about being anti-Christ and anti-Christendom and therefore necessarily anti-peoples of historic Christendom.

  125. @Rodop

    Pseudo-science : Boasian anthropology, Freudian psychology, Frankfurt School sociology, “race-is-a-social-construct” anthropology.

    Degenerated culture : nearly everything from Hollywood and on TV. Attack on Christianity. Promotion of pornography, promiscuity, feminism, abortion, homosexuality, trans-genderism. Promotion of Black “rap” and “gangsta” culture and race-mixing.

    The promotion of mass non-white immigration and wars-for-Israel in the Middle East fall under “destructive politics”.

    Thanks for the “contributions” of this “unique” people !

    • 回复: @Rodop
  126. Caruthers 说:
    @ThreeCranes

    Indeed. The “Hebrew Bible” repeatedly lionizes aggressive war and genocide for the benefit of the Chosen People, which is primarily defined by genealogy and ancestry, and which is therefore essentially a racial concept. Most religious holidays in Judaism celebrate the death and defeat of rivals.

    The Talmud, the official interpretation of the religion, is replete with the most vicious and categorical racism, positing an absolute, ontological difference between the infinite value of the Jewish soul and the worthlessness of the Gentile soul, and enjoining Jews to discriminate against Gentiles as a religious imperative.

    It is only a “universal” religion in the sense that the White Man’s Burden was a universalist concept, and slaveholders were acting on universalist principles as they claimed their “peculiar institution” benefited the slaves.

    That the rabbi was so loved and celebrated shows that the Israeli populace either agreed with his views, or sympathized with them, or, at the very least, did not find them especially troubling. Let us celebrate Gentiles who speak similarly about Jews, but who do “good works” in other areas.

  127. @Jake

    Islam doesn’t batter Christianity, it supports and protects Christianity, which cannot protect itself if it actually follows Christ’s directive to turn the other cheek. Actually Islam IS corrected Christianity. Islam largely agrees with other Christian denominations about Christ’s divine message, it agrees that Jesus was born of a holy virgin, it agrees that Jesus is Messiah, it agrees with Christian conceptions of spirituality, and it largely agrees with other Christian denominations in its conception of the afterlife. (Dante’s Divine Comedy is a wholesale plagiarism of Islam’s Isra and Mir’aj literature, as Asin Palacios demonstrated at length.)

    Muslims are ordered by their Prophet to protect and defend Christians “until the end of time.” https://covenantsoftheprophet.org

    Islamophobes (like Wahhabis) are ignorant and deluded Zionist brainwashing victims. Islam is the one Christian denomination—the only surviving and vibrant one—that can and will save European civilization and prepare it for the coming of Jesus, peace upon him, the one true Messiah.

    • 回复: @Seraphim
  128. Islam denies the divinity of God Incarnate Jesus.

    The Triune God comprised of God The Father, God The Son Jesus, and The Holy Spirit, the mystery of Christianity beyond human comprehension, is called “polytheism” by Islam and is thus subject to penalty of death under islam.

    So Islam is murderously anti Jesus and anti Christian which is why the Jews are so eager to have it in the formerly Christian West.

  129. utu 说:

    The first time I have encountered the idea that Nazism emulated Judaism was in Umberto Eco’s essay in a niche art journal. Recently I tried to locate it but I failed. That I do not remember the name of the journal does not help.

    It is interesting that a Polish historian (Feliks Koneczny) wrote about Nazism as an emulation of Judaism already before WWII and then in underground publications during WWII in Poland. He worked on his Jewish Civilization before WWII which he finished right after the war. It has been published since in Polish but for obvious reasons not widely know. Supposedly an English translation from a small publishing house in Poland is available: https://sklep.antyk.org.pl/p,the-jewish-civilization,6451.html

    Here are excerpts form article on Koneczny’s take on Jewish civilization:

    [更多]

    “Civilizational” Boundaries in Christian-Jewish Relations
    Andrew K. Wise
    https://ejournals.bc.edu/index.php/scjr/article/download/1552/1406/

    Koneczny was quite explicit in his judgment of ―Jewish civilization. In his learned opinion, since its origins it had been an incomplete civilization, defective, not possessing all the categories of being, without Truth and Beauty. Indeed, he detected only the tiniest provision of the intellectual categories of being. As an example of these shortcomings, Koneczny noted that for Jews historical thought itself is very, very difficult. From my own experience, I know that for Jewish students it is difficult to acquire this sense, difficult to understand the historical nature of people and things…He consistently maintained in his works that the civilizational question is more a matter of mentality than one of race. Thus, the key concern with Jewish civilization was the threat that the Jewish way of thinking posed to Latin civilization.

    For Koneczny, Jewish civilization was frozen in time. Already in his Plurality of Civilisations (1935), Koneczny was maintaining that the whole of community life the whole structure of Jewish civilization with a mass of detail is contained in the rules of the Old Testament. It is a sacral civilization. Jewish civilization added in time a second source-book of Jewish religion and civilisation—the Talmud… It may safely be said that there is nothing in heaven or earth which is not debated there, but always exclusively from the sacral angle… Not a corner of life escapes the restraint of rules allegedly coming from Jehovah. Jewish civilisation would become even more strongly sacral.

    The fundamental flaw in Jewish civilization is that it is sacral, which leads Jews to embrace a priori thinking and a suspiciousness towards secular learning. As early as 1926, Koneczny was writing in Ateneum Kapłańskie (the most important organ for the Polish clergy during the interwar period) that ―of all religions the Jewish one is most identical with a civilization. The Talmud is this civilization, because it contains the method of collective life in all its details, not neglecting a single category, but with several huge defects (such as the lack of scholarship)… In Jewry religion and civilization are the same. He added that while religion ―is the most important part of a civilization…only religions of a lower order create civilizations and these are also of a lower type. Koneczny later concluded that in ―sacral civilisations religion acts as a brake on progress. A religion which defines everything in categories of being must at the same time petrify everything, and in consequence its adherents are often helpless in face of new currents emerging in the process of time. Where everything is established a priori, where there is no doubt and no inquiry, progress is excluded and instead there is danger of stagnation. For Jewish civiliza- tion, this meant that there was no ―creative originality.

    Koneczny placed special emphases on Jewish legalism, which is evident in Mosaic law. He believed that the contractual agreement between them and their god meant that Jews placed law before ethics. Koneczny found that over the course of centuries there emerged here and there apriori law. It imparted sanction not to existing circumstances and was not created in a natural manner, but it was imagined, invented…Mosaic law was a prototype of apriori law. Koneczny believed that this focus on apriori law is a fundamental feature of Judaism, and consequently Jewish civilization. He stressed that ―[a]mong Jews…law is not based on ethics, but precisely the opposite: ethics are based on law. He theorized that this sacralized law became the regulator for all aspects of Jewish life, leaving no room for the development of ethics. An elephantiasis of law thus emerged: the more law the better!

    Another important factor for Koneczny was the notion of Jewish chosenness. He concluded that this special relationship with God and the faith that all must end with the Jews ruling the world was the most immutable, distinguishing characteristic of Jewish civilization. Koneczny thus identified an ethic of exclusivity that generated contempt, then hatred, for foreigners. In all of universal history, Jews have developed hatred to the highest degree… This all highlights the defective nature of Jewish civilization. This collective predestination reflects Jewish emphasis on the collective, rather than the individual, and precludes a personal relationship with God that is found in Catholicism.

    Koneczny posited that even while Jewish civilization embraced the ethic of exclusivity Jews have been forced to live among other peoples, to live within other civilizations. According to Koneczny, Jewish civilization experienced significant changes among other nations,‘ but what is most interesting is that the changes occurred for the better: the supplement of a defective civilization in many directions and lifting it to a higher level in each case. For example, Jews embraced other languages in order to express a higher order of abstract thought, since Hebrew was itself a language able to facilitate civilizational development only to a certain level, beyond which it becomes a brake on higher development.

    In 1981 George Steiner published “The Portage to San Cristobal of A.H.” which caused a stir after being adapted for the stage. There Adolf Hitler gives his defense speech in which:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Portage_to_San_Cristobal_of_A.H.
    First, Hitler claims he took his doctrines from the Jews and copied the notion of the master race from the Chosen people and their need to separate themselves from the “unclean”. “My racism is a parody of yours, a hungry imitation.”

    Next, Hitler justifies the Final Solution by maintaining that the Jews’ God, purer than any other, enslaves His subjects, continually demanding more than they can give and “blackmailing” them with ideals that cannot be attained. The “virus of utopia” had to be stopped.

    Hitler then states that he was not the originator of evil. “[Stalin] had perfected genocide” (Soviet famine of 1932–33) “when I was still a nameless scribbler in Munich.” Further, Hitler asserts that the number of lives lost due to his actions are dwarfed by various world atrocities, including those in Russia, China and Africa.

    Finally, Hitler maintains that the Reich begat Israel and suggests that he is the Messiah “whose infamous deeds were allowed by God in order to bring His people home.” He closes by asking, “Should you not honour me who have made … Zion a reality?”

  130. Druid 说:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    They also have a tendency to push their peopl to the front of the line, many of whom are very mediocre. Its a religio- ethnic nepotism.

  131. Druid 说:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    Militaristic? You lost your case there. Is it disingenuous and hatred, or do you actually believe that?

    • 回复: @Franklin Ryckaert
  132. Right off the bat, Laurent Guyenot impressed & wrote:
    “The American rabbi Harry Waton had a theory to explain the organic unity, persistence and progress of the Jews. He wrote in his Program for the Jews, published in 1939: “Hebrew religion, in fact, was intensely materialistic and it is precisely this that gave it persistent and effective reality.”

    亲爱的盖耶诺特先生,

    Speaking respectfully, I think Rabbi Waton’s interesting insight, quoted above, is succinct, but in Fyodor Dostoyevsky’s “The Grand Inquisitor,” a very similar & powerful conclusion is reached.

    The Inquisitor insisted that The Christ would have fared better had he come down from the cross, & did better at the monumental task of fulfilling human material needs.

    Uh, maybe Rabbi Waton knew that dark & scary truth without his having read “The Brothers Karamazov”?

    Nonetheless, “thanks” for the intense enlightenment, Laurent.

  133. Art 说:
    @anon

    Where did you mention group size? When you denounced the tribal. “Tribe” is by definition a smaller political group than a state.

    Arn’t Saudi and Israel “tribal” countries?

  134. @Farrakhan.DDuke.AliceWalker.AllAgree

    FarrDD: The Triune God .. of Christianity .. is called “polytheism” by Islam

    Stranger: Christianity is called polytheism by Judaism, too.
    If the trinity doctrine is not enough to convince you that xtianity is polytheism, the fact that xtianity recognizes SEPARATE independent gods of good and evil, should do it!

    Satan as “an independent god of evil” is a christian polytheist corruption of the Jewish bible. In the Jewish Bible, “Satan” is always the humble servant of God. God CREATES EVIL and Satan delivers it. Don’t shoot the messenger!

    👉Isaiah 45:7. “I form the light, and create darkness; I make peace, and CREATE EVIL;”

    In a monotheistic religion the one god must create evil. If another god did it, the religion would be polytheism. but christianity IS polytheism, so it has no problem with a separate god of evil. xtianity postulates this world as a struggle between the 3 gods of good, and the 1 god of evil.

    • 回复: @AaronB
    , @AaronB
  135. anon[361]• 免责声明 说:

    How a book that glorifies uses of unearned
    assets ( gold jewelry, metals , grains , building materials ) which rightfully belongs to other can claim any moral authority ?

    How can a book that seeks misappropriation
    and embezzlement of the fruits of the labors of someone else can provide a lighting rod for moral development ?

    How can the followers of the book claim to be force for good ?

    Also is unfathomable the way moral argument has been made against Hitler and against Baalami ( in the book- A Program For The
    Jews) by the rabbi .

    If certain practices , ideas, and expectations are good for Israelis ( Jews)
    , Jews should be last person to say that it’s not for non-Jews.

    Conflict is not necessary.

    Hitler could have his way and Jews could
    have theirs .

    Same is true for Balam.

    It seems Jews wanted to deprive the rest of the world the very things they want and the way they want .

    Or am I missing something !

  136. “旧约的上帝可以说是所有小说中最不愉快的角色:嫉妒和自豪; 轻微,不公正,不容忍的控制怪胎; 斗气,嗜血的民族清洁剂; 厌恶,同性恋,种族主义,杀婴,种族灭绝,杀人,瘟疫,狂妄,施虐受虐,反复无常的恶霸。”

    ― Richard Dawkins

    The consequences of worshipping such a monster would seem to have bourn fruit.

    • 回复: @root
  137. AaronB 说:
    @Professional Stranger

    大多同意。

    Bruce Charlton, a man with a thoroughly modern and positivistic mentality interprets Christianity in its most literal and obvious sense – and explicitly rejects monotheism and claims authentic Christianity is polytheistic.

    The Trinity as aspects of the divinity is not problematic for Judaism – the problem is, Christianity does not clearly make that claim, nor does it clearly posit distinct Gods. It’s sort of both.

    That is why it was always held to be a confusing doctrine that stumped the intellect. A mysterium tremendum.

    There have been authoritative orthodox Jewish opinions that accept Christianity as monotheistic, or at least not pagan and not “heathen”.

    Although the Trinity has always made Christianity more problematic for Jews.

  138. AaronB 说:
    @Professional Stranger

    And yes, Judaism is a non dualistic system which does not posit evil as having a separate source from good. In this respect it is similar to Eastern religions.

    Evil is in some sense not quite real in Judaism – its just that we humans cannot comprehend the mysterious ways of God. The whole book of Job illustrates the need for Faith, and our inability to understand.This is strikingly similar to Eastern traditions.

    Christianity is confusing on this subject too – Lucifer is a fallen angel so lesser than God, and has in some sense been already defeated, but is still an independent force that fights God.

    However, Christian mystics come closer to the Jewish and Eastern path. I do not know about Islam.

  139. @Druid

    The prophet Muhammad himself was a warlord who engaged in numerous battles in which booty was taken and slaves were made. Female captives could be used as sex slaves. One fifth of the war booty was destined for Muhammad himself, who received a special “revelation from Allah” to that effect, which can be found in Qur’an 8 : 41 :

    And know that whatever of war-booty that you may gain, verily, one-fifth of it is assigned to Allah, and to the Messenger, and to the near relatives (of the Messenger), and also the orphans, Al‑Masaakin (the poor) and the wayfarer”.

    After his death his successors the caliphs conquered a major part of the ancient world for Islam. Muslim armies conquered Spain in 712 and could only be stopped at Poitiers in France in 732. The 征服 of Spain took 760 years. The Balkans were conquered by the Muslim Turks and occupied for some four centuries. Constantinople, conquered in 1453, is still in Turkish hands. Vienna was besieged by them in 1683. Muslim armies also conquered Central Asia and India.

    Muslim rulers have the duty to spread Islam by the sword. Muslim “theologians” divide the world into 3 parts : 伊斯兰堡 (“house of Islam”), the part already conquered for Islam, and 达尔·阿尔哈布 (“house of war”), also called 达尔库弗 (“house of the unbelievers”), the part yet to be conquered. Between the two lies a zone called Dar al-sulh (“house of treaty”) were a temporary “peace” is maintained until the Muslims are strong enough to wage further wars. Ideally such “peace” should not last longer than 10 years. The ultimate aim is to conquer the whole world.

    This is the real nature Islam, an aggressive movement to conquer militarily the world and subjugate it to Islamic rule. It is not “prejudice” or “hatred” to acknowledge this reality, but ignorance and naivity to believe otherwise.

    • 回复: @Parfois1
    , @anon
    , @Druid
  140. Anon[363]• 免责声明 说:

    Spinoza is one of the vertices of all philosophy — it’s awkward to see his name beside Mahler’s… And if he isn’t mainstream that’s because few philosophers have the reach to interest in him and grasp his concepts.

    **
    “Psyche” wasn’t understood as a beyond-bodily reality even in Greek/Hellenistic culture for centuries (see Jaynes’s Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind for a full treatment of the matter)

  141. Anonymous [AKA "Gott mit Unz"] 说:

    The Book of Genesis, whose anthropological materialism is the most explicit, betrays Mesopotamian and Persian influences that cannot be anterior to the Babylonian Exile. Significantly, it uses the Persian word Pardes to designate the “Garden” (of Eden), but turns its meaning upside down: whereas in Indo-European myths, Paradise is the happy world where the righteous dead become immortal by eating from the tree of life, in Genesis, it is a past lost forever for all mankind, and the stage of the drama that brought into the world the double scourge of death and labor; for death bears no promise, and work no spiritual reward.

    That the Book of Genesis in its current form probably postdates the Babylonian exile is a position which many scholars would support, but the rest of this is simply wrong. The word pardes does indeed appear in the Hebrew Bible just not in Genesis, as can easily be confirmed (e.g., here: https://biblehub.com/hebrew/strongs_6508.htm). On the other hand the actual term for “Garden of Eden” in Genesis, Gan Eden, has a long history of use in Jewish tradition as a name for the “paradise” to which the righteous dead will indeed return in “the World to Come” (ha-Olam ha-Ba)–a concept which is very much present in Jewish thinking about “life after death.” It is true that this conception, in explicit form, appears to postdate the Hebrew Bible itself, but if the goal is to describe the Jewish character as reflected in its religious traditions (and not, say, merely the presumed worldview of the writer of Genesis), then it is simply wrong to say that in its view “paradise” is lost forever for all mankind. Quite the contrary.

    Guyénot undoubtedly is correct regarding the collectivist nature of Jewish conceptions of “salvation” (he might, for example, have quoted the famous mishna which serves as a recurring epigraph in the 父亲的话: “All Israel has a share in the World to Come”), but his characterization of the metaphysical particulars of that salvation is debatable. Some Jews of course have taken the kind of strictly materialist view Guyénot claims as normative (he has quotations from them, after all, to back him up), but there is ample evidence that many Jews, both historically and today, would vehemently disagree. Unfortunately, gaffes like the one here, or the howler he commits in the comments above when he declares that “Ecclesiastes is not even part of the Tanakh . . . it belongs to Hellenistic literature rejected even by rabbinical Judaism” (lol wut?) don’t inspire much confidence that he is a reliable guide to that debate.

    • 回复: @Laurent Guyénot
    , @Anonymous
  142. Seraphim 说:
    @Laurent Guyénot

    Well, the main source of confusion consists in considering the so-called ‘Hellenistic Judaism’ as something entirely different from ‘Hebraic Judaism’, ‘infiltrated’ if not ‘polluted’ by Greco-Egyptian thought (as if Moses was not ‘influenced’ by it in the first place), instead of its expression in the Greek language for the use of Jews who were not speaking Hebrew anymore, whence the Septuagint, which is the ‘Hebrew Scriptures’ in the Greek language. The confusion is accentuated by the conception of the Scriptures as a ‘Book’ descended from Heavens once and for all (rather like the printed English “Bible’) and not a historical process of unfolding revelation and interpretations (and revisions due to inevitable corruption of texts in the process of copying them) of the Word, until the final revelation of the Incarnation of the Word.
    A parallel process took place in the Aramaic speaking Middle East, where the Hebrew Scriptures were translated in the Aramaic language (the Targum) which would be the base of the Scriptures used by the ‘Oriental Christians’.
    I see that you persist in the confusion of the ‘Ecclesiastes/Qohelet’, written by Solomon and part of the Tanakh, and ‘Ecclesiasticus/Wisdom of Ben Sirach’, translated in Greek from Hebrew in the Hellenistic period, but not included in the Tanakh. The ‘Book of the Wisdom of Solomon’ was written in Greek in the Hellenistic period, but the existence of Aramaic fragments of it raises many questions.

    • 回复: @Laurent Guyénot
  143. @Seraphim

    You don’t need to talk about “confusion”. It is just a question of different “points of view”. Your point of view is valid: Judaism cannot be reduced to its first manifestation (whether we consider that starting point to be the Mosaic tradition or the Tanakh as compiled in Babylon). The same can be said of every religion: Islam cannot be reduced to the Koran, as Wahhabism claims it should. I am fully aware of this point of view. In an article, I cannot go around describing my subject from every viewpoint. I chose a particular viewpoint, which is also valid: the starting point is like the DNA of the religion. You can add many things to it, yet the fundamental character will not change. And I think it is beyond dispute that the oldest strata of the Hebrew Bible is agressively materialistic and holistic. And, as I said, it is not materialistic because of some kind of primitivism: it is materialistic because it is at war with every other religion.
    This point of view is important to document because it happens to be the point of view of many elite Jews: I took as example the Straussians, who are definitely the most influential elites Jews today: They are intensely biblical (and prophetic) and therefore materialistic and holistic (in short, Machiavellian, if we agree with Strauss’ understanding of Machiavelli. But the same can be said of most Zionists since Ben-Gurion. (we could say they are like the Wahhabists of Judaism). If I had written about the Jewish faith of the Jewish masses, I would have taken a completely different viewpoint, for I am aware that most religious Jews believe in the afterlife. My point is to document how the elites who are shaping the NWO read the Bible and take their worldview from it, not how it should be read.
    Now, regarding the other “confusion” which you accuse me of, I am sure you understand that the error I made in a comment (I don’t proof read my comments) doesn’t affect the general thesis. If I had written, like you do,

    ‘Ecclesiastes/Qohelet’, written by Solomon,

    then, yes, there would be reason to lose confidence in my knowledge of biblical scholarship.

  144. @Anonymous

    I do make errors. And I do appreciate when someone points them out, so that I can improve my text. I am not a biblical scholar, and even if I were, I would make errors here and there, unless I get some colleagues to proofread my articles. But then, I wouldn’t write such articles, for fear of losing my job (I lost my job anyway). So I take note: Pardès is not the name of the Garden of Eden, and my point about this Paradise being an inverted version of the Persian Otherworld of the good dead is not conclusive. Does that weaken the general thesis of the article?
    Nex point:

    Some Jews of course have taken the kind of strictly materialist view Guyénot claims as normative (he has quotations from them, after all, to back him up), but there is ample evidence that many Jews, both historically and today, would vehemently disagree.

    I don’t claim it is “normative”; I claim it is widely shared by many of the most influential Jews, including Zionists, whether religious or not. (more in my comment 146)

  145. For this reason, all other religions negate the earth and the material world and are indifferent to the well-being and progress of mankind on this earth.

    This Rabbi dude was obviously fucking retarded. Ever seen the interior of St Peter’s? St Paul’s? St Michael’s? Chartres? Notre Dame?

    That set of gold-plated expressions of earthly might negates the material world, does it? Does it fuck.

    Religions are – always and everywhere – all about some pack of grifters convincing people with the worldly-wisdom of a dim 4 year old, that they (the grifters) have the answer to all the Big Questions.

    Never mind that as technology advances, all of those answers turn out to have been horse-shit.

    To (almost) quote the (almost-) masterful new ‘Toast’ vehicle “Year of the Rabbit”:

    “[Life] is a rat eating its own babies, babies made of shit, and once it eats its own shit babies, it shits them out again, and then it noshes them, and that goes on and on until the sun turns cold and the sea goes back into the sky.”

    Or to (almost) quote The Dread Pirate Roberts (channeling Schopenhauer):

    Life is pain, Princess: anyone who says otherwise is selling something.

    But there is always a market for grifters to exploit the bottom 4 quintiles of the IQ distribution with tales about a glorious life everlasting… just pay for my palace and I’ll tell you how to get in.

  146. Parfois1 说:

    Full marks for a great article and cogent scholarship. It discusses and provides a gateway into the origins and evolution of Jewish power from a historical and cultural perspective while leaving wide scope for alternative theories. A tour de force indeed.

    • 同意: Erebus
  147. Parfois1 说:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    The reconquista of Spain took 760 years.

    Normally I would not quibble with that statement, but its careless repetition gets annoying because it shows … well, carelessness and that affects credibility. The northern mountainous regions of Iberia (Spain did not exist as a country until late 15th century) were not conquered by Islam (though they were raided a few times). Navarre, Aragon and Portugal were freed in the 10th century while Castille and Leon completed the reconquest by the 13th century, leaving only a miniscule Islamic presence in Granada until 1492. Don’t know why the Christians left it alone for so long, perhaps for commercial reasons.
    By that time the Portuguese were forging an empire in North Africa, starting with the conquest of Ceuta in 1415.

    • 回复: @Franklin Ryckaert
  148. @Parfois1

    Like any action, a reconquest lasts as long it is not completed. The Reconquista was completed in 1492, therefore it lasted 781 years from 711 (I had my numbers wrong in my comment above). Further details are for historians.

  149. refl 说:
    @AaronB

    The idea that Jews should open their jeshivas to non-Jews to resolve any suspicion against Jewish conspiracies falls far behind what the article establishes

    We can compare the structure of the Jewish community to concentric orbital spheres in a gravitational field, with Yahweh’s ideology and prophecies at the core: in the inner spheres is the elite minority for whom Jewishness and Israel are permanent concerns

    If I suppose that there was some Jewish elite in New York that declared war on Germany to drive non-zionist Jews out of Europe and into the Middle East, letting a huge portion of them die in a crazed eugenistical program – if I believe that there was an idea as crazy as this, and if I follow the general line if articles here on 乌兹网, then I am driven to believe this – then the most obvious consequence must have been that most Jews who saw this coming, ran from it (and most probably did).
    The zionist elite might have consisted of nothing more then a few ultrarich, ultrainfluential families with their personal rabbies, who knew how to get their way. And I understand that a great many Jews were and are today unable to disconnect from their power.
    As a not very well trained Christian I know that this whole thing can only lead to disaster on a gigantic scale. He who elevates himself will be humiliated. That is about everything you need to know.

    Else, I am not to much into studying religious issues. When at University, I was quite into German idealism, for its universalist qualities. I always ran from anything völkisch – and still could be an enthusiastic student.

    • 回复: @AaronB
  150. root 说:
    @Capt. Roy Harkness

    Pathetic Dawkins claimed this was a joke while on stage with Odious Sacks.

    At 4:08 and more at 19:55 (where Dawkins also denies this “joke” is anti-semitic but rather anti-god).

    • 回复: @root
  151. root 说:
    @root

    I couldn’t embed the video, here it is:

  152. @Laurent Guyénot

    Guyénot: In the quote mentionned by Professional Stranger in comment #4 from Ecclesiastes 12: “And the dust returns to the earth as it was, And the spirit returns to God who gave it,” the right translation for ruah is not “spirit” but “breath”.

    The quote came from the JPS
    ז וְיָשֹׁב הֶעָפָר עַל-הָאָרֶץ, כְּשֶׁהָיָה; וְהָרוּחַ תָּשׁוּב, אֶל-הָאֱלֹהִים אֲשֶׁר נְתָנָהּ. 7 And the dust returns to the earth as it was, and the spirit returns unto God who gave it.
    http://www.mechon-mamre.org/p/pt/pt3112.htm

    Strong’s shows “ruwach” רוּחַ occurs as, number of times:
    Spirit or spirit 232, wind 92, breath 27, side 6, mind 5, blast 4, vain 2, air 1, anger 1, cool 1, courage 1, misc 6
    NOTE: “spirit” is by far the most common. But of course the translators decide whether the word is being used literally or figuratively. In other words: it is usually used figuratively as “spirit”.

    http://www.blbclassic.org/lang/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?Strongs=H7307&t=KJV
    Of course Strong’s searches the xtian KJV, but it is very close to the JPS, and its the best search engine available.

    What you are arguing now is that the Hebrew Bible WOULD be materialistic, if people translated it the RIGHT way, YOUR way!

    • 同意: AaronB
    • 回复: @AaronB
    , @Seraphim
  153. AaronB 说:
    @refl

    You make a reasonable point. To be honest, I only skimmed the article very hastily, because it was so full of eye rolling errors and elementary mistakes, and motivated distortions and just plain silliness.

    I suppose if one wishes to posit some nefarious elite etc etc, then the fact that the overwhelming majority of mainstream Jews interpret their religion a certain way is beside the point.

    It kind of reminds me of Freudian theory – can’t be proven, and any attempt to disprove it only establishes that one is trying to deceive, etc, etc.

    The truth is Laurent is a materialist HBD believer – he is motivated to show that a successful group like the Jews is so because it too is materialistic. He is trying to vindicate materialism.

    When the most obvious fact staring anyone in the face is that multi-generational concern can only rest on a supernatural foundation, and that as Europeans became more materialistic they lost the capacity for long range thinking of the kind Jews still retain – rooted as they still are in the supernatural.

    Anyways, this is just one more nail in the coffin of white people, and the attempt to deepen the materialistic sickness that is killing them rather than move towards health.

    Stuff like this is why I finally abandoned whiteness and returned to my Jewish roots.

    I used to be really into German idealism as well, but I discovered to my surprise that Judaism actually combines universalism with particularism in a very fruitful way, and is a very different religion than I had supposed.

    • 回复: @root
    , @refl
  154. AaronB 说:
    @Professional Stranger

    The most common usage of ruach in Judaism is “ruach hakodesh”, which literally means “holy spirit”. When a great Rabbi has some extraordinary insight, its said he has been visited by the “ruach hakodesh”, the holy spirit.

    Maybe its the holy breath 🙂

    Of course, spirit also means alcohol, so it’s clear that the Holy Spirit in Christianity is merely referring to drinking vodka….

    I now understand everything about Europe lol – Laurent has given me the key!

    Of course, ruach hakodesh is only used like that for millennia by all the sacred scriptures and great Rabbis, not the secretive elite that Laurent alone has special access to, which, we now know, is really entirely materialistic…

    Which of course vindicates Laurents own HBD materialism, and will become the basis for the rejuvenation of the European nations, just as it, err, has been for Jews.

    Good times at Unz 🙂

    • 同意: Professional Stranger
  155. root 说:
    @AaronB

    Stuff like this is why I finally abandoned whiteness and returned to my Jewish roots.

    You’re doing great kid.

  156. refl 说:
    @AaronB

    a successful group like the Jews is so because it too is materialistic

    Call me stupid, but their success does not interest me the least bit, not to use stronger words. And if the Pastafari community turned out to be economically successfull, they would not interest me neither.
    I simply find the idea of a god who cares for the economical advancement of “his” people worrysome. At times I have taken pleasure in throwing blasphemical remarks at people whom I knew had grown up at catholic schools. But never would I have been so deprived as to imagine god as a real estate agent.

    The idea of a materialistic religion appears odd, but I could pass it by. If that religion has consequences that threaten humanity, noone in his right mind can stay calm.
    I fear that that Jewish preacher from Galilea still has something to say.

    • 回复: @AaronB
  157. Tsigantes 说:
    @Anonymous

    To think this joyless benighted people are doing ‘something right’ you yourself must be a warmonger for profit and a financial parasite. No doubt you also believe these practises equate with intelligence and will take you right to ‘the top’ – including a fantasy of world domination.

  158. AaronB 说:
    @refl

    A God who does not care for the welfare of his people, and for the welfare of mankind, would be rather useless 🙂

    Look, the modern world has tried this. It didn’t work out. Everything is self destructing.

    God as you imagine him could never have inspired the music of Bach, or the work of Michelangelo.

    The modern world is finished, and the whites who cling to it are goners. You strike me as an old white man who represents the dying world of modernity – it is a generational thing.

    • 回复: @Anon
    , @refl
  159. Anon[140]• 免责声明 说:

    个人主义心理学的最大错误是人认为的假设。 […]。 因为思考的不是人本人,而是他的社会共同体。 他思想的来源是他生活所在的社会媒介,他呼吸的社会气氛,除了他的社会环境对他的大脑的影响所必需的以外,他别无选择。 […]。 个人只是简单地扮演接收光线的棱镜部分,按照固定的规律将它们溶解,然后让它们以预定的方向和颜色重新发出。”

    Such quotation, and this article’s author’s quotation of it bring up a curious perplexity. Did Gumplowicz and do they who quote him approvingly judge themselves not men, not thinking, or miracle-exceptions to the rule that explains everyone else?
    Does the perplexity cross their minds?

  160. Anon[140]• 免责声明 说:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    Organisms are organisms (or “individuals” if we want to employ the approximation), not races.
    They can groups as “races” if it serves their own interest.
    The reason many “social scientists”, and rhetoricians on the right and left have claimed that organisms don’t exist as entities separate from the “group” is because, well, that kind of preaching served their own interest…
    So AaronB’s points — for once — stands.

    • 回复: @Franklin Ryckaert
  161. Anon[140]• 免责声明 说:
    @AaronB

    The modern world is finished. Now, the goners may be succeeded by… just other peoples nor related with them, making room for others still in a pre-modern world, or go further to a new mindset (thus a new world — the world and the mindset having their real chances to come into being because they can exist, though you seem to believe the counter conviction).
    The option you champion/prescribe, a return to previous mindsets for a people that has left them behind is out of the question.

    • 回复: @AaronB
  162. @Robert Dolan

    如何确保国民财富分配更加公正? 在过去的大约公元100年,罗马当局开创了一种名为“犹太税”的榕树Judaicus,目的是抵消犹太人对社会造成的额外成本负担。 我们是否敢于建议恢复这种事情? 数万亿美元可以对纠正现代社会的错误大有帮助。

  163. ps: Japanese don’t do goy.
    Iceland either.

  164. AaronB 说:
    @Anon

    The belief that the world is evolving is itself just a modern concept – it is a reversal of the traditional concept that the world is devolving.

    Modernity seems new, but it is merely the systematic reversal of all traditional concepts.

    Once that has played out, the 仅由 possible direction to go is “back” – once every last traditional concept is flipped on its head, and we are at the end of that particular game with LGBT etc, then there is only one direction to move in – “back”.

    Or, we can “mix” the old and its opposite, modernity, to achieve some hybrid state, but as modernity developed, we already passed through these “mixed” stages – and anyways that would still be moving “back”.

    In the end God and Truth are timeless because it contains all possibilities. Connecting with God satisfies your longing for eternity and wholeness – novelty, the desire for the ever new, is merely a substitute for wholeness, which contains all possibilities within itself, all possible newness.

    • 回复: @root
    , @Anon
  165. Tsigantes 说:
    @Robert Dolan

    While I agree with your remarks, I’m mystified as to how you arrived at this answer to Svevlad who says none of what you say.
    I found his statements incomprehensible – i.e. that the jews’ behaviour is not unique but the same as 所有 of the peoples of the Balkans, MENA and Caucasus. He doesn’t specify a period so I assume all periods. Sorry, but his is an outrageous, stupid and ahistorical statement….

  166. refl 说:
    @AaronB

    The dying world of modernity has been dying for quite a while. The thing that bothers me is that it has been doing so so noisily and with so much evil done to so many people.

    It does not bother me to belong to some dying life form, for as long as I am sure that I am doing the right thing, I am an example. Whites have conquered the world over the past couple hundred years and it is coming home on them – do I care? The only sort of people I cannot do with is anyone who believes himself to be something extraordinary, who wants to be served an extra dish.
    The jewish people I have got to know were quite regular and I would certainly not wish them any harm. The exception were two Israeli guys I met on different occasions, who might have had some orthodox education (as I have come to supose) and were extremely arrogant.

    Germans have Weltfrömmigkeit, and you certainly know what I am talking about. Others have similar ideas. If some god told me that he had chosen me for a special relationship with him, I would tell him to bugger off and do his job properly.

    And as I know that I am right, I know that Zionist, materialistic Jews have inflicted on their own people tremendous and irrevocable harm, which must hit with a vengeance. Notwithstanding, there must be other forms of Jewishness, who in all innocence will probably be hit along with the Zionists.

    • 回复: @AaronB
    , @Druid
  167. @Anon

    Individual entities, whether in the plant, animal or human kingdom, are products of endogamic, homogeneous groups. If that were not the case, species or sub-species, the building blocks of nature, would not exist. Without such building blocks, nature itself would not exist, cultural Marxist pseudo-science be damned.

    • 回复: @Anon
  168. root 说:
    @AaronB

    Once that has played out, the only possible direction to go is “back” – once every last traditional concept is flipped on its head, and we are at the end of that particular game with LGBT etc, then there is only one direction to move in – “back”.

    Wasn’t your King David gay?

    https://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/2019/6/9/on-biblical-celebrities-and-jewish-symbolism

  169. Titus 说:
    @Laurent Guyénot

    First of all, great article. Great paradigm to use in understanding Jewish thinking/behavior. Absolutely fundamental.

    First, neither Psalms nor Ecclesiastes are part of the Torah (=Pentateuch).

    Lev 18:5 You shall therefore keep my statutes and my rules; if a person does them, he shall live [obtain eternal life] by them: I am the LORD.

    The Rashi commentary on Lev 18:5 and the Palestine Targum both support that this verse promises eternal life on the basis of obedience. Christ himself acknowledged this very principle when approached by Jews who ask him how they might obtain eternal life and he told them to obey the law (keep the 10 commandments). See Mark 10:17-19.

    God’s covenant with the Jewish people (styled variously as “the law”, “the law of Moses”) offered eternal life on the basis of obedience [Deut. 30:19].

    Beyond that, with regard to the verse in Psalms, those are the words of King David and its beyond a stretch to suggest he, in his words, was somehow outside of Jewish religious orthodoxy. The principle message of the Torah was that eternal life was a function of obedience.

    Second, Ecclesiastes is not even part of the Tanakh (=Hebrew Bible): as I wrote (but you obviously didn’t read), it belongs to Hellenistic literature rejected even by rabbinical Judaism.

    Sure it is. Here’s a Tanakh link to it. https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/book-of-kohelet-ecclesiastes

    You could have found much better quotes, for there are many exceptions to the rule, but the rule remains: no individual immortality in the Torah. Take off your Christian glasses and you will see it.

    In this case, “many exceptions” would disprove “the rule”. The easy resolution in all this is found in your own words, the “evolution of Judaism”. There’s a wide gulf between what the Torah or OT actually teaches and what modern Judaism might claim that it teaches. Modern Judaism is a divorce from OT Judaism regardless of whatever lip service Jews might give to the Torah or claims that its part of their canon.

    The Talmud is the very revelation of the Jewish penchant for hijacking the Torah to suit their purposes. So, it should come as no surprise that they see a denial of individual immortality in its pages and support for immortality as a nation in spite of the fact that the prophet of Isaiah clearly taught that this earth would ultimately be consumed by fire.

  170. Titus 说:
    @anon

    Note to self: Find the word Zion in the New Testament and somehow magically imply that translates into support for Zionism.

    You, sir, are retarded.

  171. Anon[140]• 免责声明 说:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    They still pursue their own interest. Pursuing the “group” ‘s interest happens when it is compulsory or it is believed to benefit the individual entity.
    You could even talk about organs, within the organisms, that each pursue their interests, within the confines of what the “forceful” organization of the entire organism allows them, lol.

    I am sure you know much more than I do about cultural Marxist pseudo-science, but as far as I know it’s a mainstay of every leftist theory to 假装 that individuals have as their purpose the “community” and the “community” ‘s purposes per se (not because it is to their convenience to, or to pretend to).

  172. Anon[140]• 免责声明 说:
    @AaronB

    Perhaps we disagree less than it could seem. I too have the “sensation” (I would be at a loss to name it any other way) that there is a whole, and history is its progressive unfurling, the self-styled actors being only acted/spectators.

    Even subscribing to this… I don’t think we can know what will come next. This, it seems to me, stays true even if the future of mankind is exhausted by the overturning of all what is in history. How could we know to what degree, in what forms and ways, it would be reversed in the future? We don’t even really know all what is behind our time, and my mind goes to the human mind prior to the transition from “oral” civilizations to “written” civilizations.

    But you seem to wish for a return to a, say, 17th or 15th or 10th century mindset, not a before-Christ mindset.

    • 回复: @AaronB
  173. AaronB 说:
    @refl

    Jewish spirituality is not about being better than others -it is about spreading God’s message to mankind, and the message is one of peace, kindness, and charity.

    I am not aware of too many people in the ancient world who had this message – the Romans certainly did not.

    I cannot defend the actions of many members of today’s Jewish generation – and believe me, no one knows better than Jews that Divine wrath is visited upon iniquity. It is the cornerstone of our history. That being said, there is always a righteous remnant.

    Jewish “specialness” is entirely a function of God’s message to mankind – and that implies that the gentiles are of supreme importance in God’s eyes.

    It does not imply personal superiority – and in fact the Bible portrays the Jews as particularly troublesome and difficult. What other national book portrays its own people so poorly? It is because Jewish specialness is not racial – it is a function of living up to God’s task.

    As for not wanting the burden, I believe Noah tried to avoid it as well – in many ways it is too heavy a burden.

    But God is God, and it is not for us to contend with him.

    As for the rest of your attitude, it is unbearable – I choose God and Life.

    You chose death – I do not know why.

    • 回复: @Druid
  174. AaronB 说:
    @Anon

    Well the thing is, I don’t think the modern mentality is really anything new – take any old idea, flip it, and you have a modern idea. In other words, nothing was invented – the old ideas were just reversed.

    Were men dominant? Well now it must be women. Was Faith valued? Well now it must be skepticism. And so forth for each modern idea – nothing new was invented.

    So in a sense modernity has always existed.

    I suppose sooner or later mankind would have to embark on the experiment of reversing every concept and see where that led, on a truly grand and systematic scale.

    But reversing old concepts was something individuals had always done in a smaller basis – atheism is as old as man, and 9th century Baghdad struggled with feminism – so modernity has always existed nested in tradition.

    If anything new emerges now, it will only be something that has always nested within tradition – an old idea that we have not yet flipped on a grand scale. We are running out of such ideas.

    I do agree with you, however, that there are old ideas that have not been flipped yet and we will probably be surprised by the next ones our society chooses to flip.

    I also think we will probably have to run this experiment to the bitter end before we return to sanity, if we survive.

    I think the modern 欲望 for novelty-in-time is a substitute for the Absolute (although I hate that phrase) which contains everything – which is obviously God, and wholeness, and infinity.

    As for what precise “balance” we will settle into after the Experiment, yes, it probably will be somewhere between the extremes of ancient times and modernity.

    I do not deny development, but endless progress circles back on itself necessarily, as I hope I’ve explained.

    An idea can only develop into its opposite – if it 继续 developing, it 必须go back to the original idea and describe s circle.

    So endless progress is incoherent – but development is possible – simply because everything must oscillate between itself and it’s opposite. Once it reaches its opposite, if it continues going, it must go back to the opposite of its opposite – which is its original self 🙂

    有意义吗?

  175. Seraphim 说:
    @Professional Stranger

    Obviously ‘breath’ in that context is the ‘breath of God’, the πνεῦμα, the Spirit. God is Spirit, anyway.

    • 回复: @Professional Stranger
  176. Anonymous [AKA "tao"] 说: • 您的网站

    Metzitzah B’peh. Hormones in the male foreskin, empathy, compassion, et al, et cetera, sucked off via the Rabbi. Until circumcision isn’t, then insanity is.

  177. @Seraphim

    The Septuagint uses that word..
    传道书12
    7 καὶ ἐπιστρέψῃ ὁ χοῦς ἐπὶ τὴν γῆν ὡς ἦν καὶ τὸ πνεῦμα ἐπιστρέψῃ πρὸς τὸν θεόν ὃς ἔδωκεν αὐτό
    7 [before] the dust also return to the earth as it was, and the 精神 return to God who gave it.
    https://www.sacred-texts.com/bib/sep/ecc012.htm#007
    https://www.ellopos.net/elpenor/greek-texts/septuagint/chapter.asp?book=27&page=12

    But Google translate https://translate.google.com/?source=gtx_c#auto/en/%CF%80%CE%BD%CE%B5%E1%BF%A6%CE%BC%CE%B1
    … Just shows Greek πνεῦμα = English spirit

    Nothing about “breath”. Looks like the Greek translators already made a judgement call.

  178. Anonymous [AKA "bitte"] 说:
    @Anonymous

    Since you seem knowledgeable of the topic, I have a question for you:
    What are the constants, the unifying characteristics of Jewishness?
    Are these the beliefs, or the rituals, or the genetic lineage? Or what?
    If there are no constants, then who is a Jew?
    I haven’t come across any exposition that would illuminate the issue, so I give it a try here.

    • 回复: @anarchyst
  179. 更详细:
    Looks like the Greek translators already made a judgement call when they translated Hebrew “ruach” רוּחַ as Greek πνεῦμα (spirit), in this context.

  180. Seraphim 说:

    “In the beginning God made the heaven and the earth. 2 But the earth was unsightly and unfurnished, and darkness was over the deep, and the Spirit of God moved over the water”
    ΕΝ ἀρχῇ ἐποίησεν ὁ Θεὸς τὸν οὐρανὸν καὶ τὴν γῆν. 2 ἡ δὲ γῆ ἦν ἀόρατος καὶ ἀκατασκεύαστος, καὶ σκότος ἐπάνω τῆς ἀβύσσου, καὶ πνεῦμα Θεοῦ ἐπεφέρετο ἐπάνω τοῦ ὕδατος.
    והארץ היתה תהו ובהו וחשך על־פני תהום ורוח אלהים מרחפת על־פני המים (Wəhā’āreṣ hāyəṯāh ṯōhû wāḇōhû wəḥōšeḵ ‘al-pənê ṯəhôm wərûaḥ ’ĕlōhîm məraḥep̱eṯ ‘al-pənê hammāyim).
    Word: רוח אלהים
    Representation: RUKh ELHIM
    Transliteration: Ruach Elohim
    Noun: “Elohim’s directing power”
    Strong Concordance: H7306 and H430.
    “Elohim ‘directing power’= Βασιλεία τοῦ Θεοῦ – Basileia tou Theou”=Kingdom of God
    Thayer’s Greek Lexicon: Basileia:
    1) royal power, kingship, dominion, rule
    1a) not to be confused with an actual kingdom but rather the right or authority to rule over a kingdom.

    • 回复: @Professional Stranger
  181. anarchyst 说:
    @Anonymous

    这很容易…
    犹太人是唯一缺乏道德成分的群体。 犹太人非常不道德,不要想从金钱,财产甚至声誉或生活中“捣蛋”。 您会看到,犹太人的手掌将犹太人比其他人提升了很多,“ goyim”是“有灵魂的牲畜,只为服务犹太人而生”。
    这种道德是犹太人生活中的重要组成部分,部分原因是犹太人的成功。 当一个人没有道德上的指南针来定义和区分“对与错”时,THAT本身就会给犹太人更大的自由度,可以“得到他想要的东西”,因为犹太人在获取利益方面可以做些什么“没有限制”。几乎任何情况。 犹太人生活中缺乏道德成分是文明社会犹太人至高无上的主要原因。

    • 同意: Druid
  182. Rodop 说:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    Sorry, I thought that by chance I have found myself in a group of sane people discussing world matters.

    • 回复: @Franklin Ryckaert
  183. @Rodop

    你可以随时 make aliya to the websites of the ADL, SPLC or any other kosher site. Proclaiming woke goyim as “insane” does not work anymore.

  184. anon[117]• 免责声明 说:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    Christianity would have been a foot note in the history if it were not for the imperialistic dream of child killer wife killer emperor Constantine . Same goes for Buddhism whose spread was possible by imperial edict financial and political muscles .

    Islam in its early days were attacked by the Mecca tribes often with the help of the Jews .Early Islamic community was sanctioned by the Mecca tribe . Raids against their caravans by early Muslim came in response to those attacks.

    (Iran ,Syria and Iraq would be perfectly legal in attacking those countries who put sanctions on them – may be the future will confirm their sufferings and the legitimate retribution )

    Islam did not become a predominant religion in Syria Palestine and Egypt until 12- 13 century long after the conquest of these countries.

    • 回复: @Franklin Ryckaert
  185. Patrick 说:

    Jewish immortality in the Jewish people is Confucian. In China they do the same thing except it is more focused on immortality through family bloodlines through a process of ancestor veneration. People are encouraged to be good parents because they want their children and grandchildren to venerate and remember them. Ancient Romans did the same. Roman households had household shrines to the ancestors, the Roman concept of the afterlife was that spirits of the dead lived on earth with the living. And so the afterlife of a soul was determined by how well the situation their descendants were in. Nowadays both Christians and Pagans are reviving ancestor veneration. I have a shrine to my ancestors. The idea of soul survival with ethnic groups and family bloodlines is correct.

    • 回复: @Art
  186. @Seraphim

    Seraphim quotes Genesis 1: “the 神的灵 moved over the water”
    … Ruach Elohim

    Stranger: Good example of “ruach” used in the sense of “spirit”!

  187. @anon

    The difference is that “childkiller and wifekiller” Roman emperor Constantine was not the founder of Christianity and figured as its “prophet”.

    Indian emperor Ashoka renounced violence after converting to Buddhism. Thereafter he send peaceful missionaries into the world. There is not such a thing as “Buddhist jihad”.

    All Muslim military expansion beyond the Arab peninsula was pure imperialism. Not converting the subject population by force had little to do with Muslim “tolerance”. Such people represented a handsome source of income because of the 吉兹亚 tax. All first Muslim conquests were in lands of Christians and Zoroastrians. Those people were already “people of the Book”, so why subjugating them? The answer is : 吉兹亚.

    In India the Hindus were clearly “polytheistic idolators” according to Muslim theology. Hence they should be converted by force, but the Muslim rulers didn’t do that because then they would lose their 吉兹亚 income from India’s millions of Hindus.

    All of this clearly shows that Muslim expansion was imperialism out of greed and not out of “piety”.

  188. @Franklin Ryckaert

    Ryckeart: All Muslim military expansion beyond the Arab peninsula was pure imperialism

    Imperialism is just the name given to the territorial expansion that all pack-animals do, when the human animal does it. Religion is just an excuse, and the flavor of the religion varies.

  189. @Franklin Ryckaert

    Ryckeart: There is not such a thing as “Buddhist jihad”.

    Stranger: Yes there is.
    [[Buddhism as a justification for colonialism
    During the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries a number of Buddhist figures, such as Kimura Shigeyuki and Mitsui Koshi, upheld the Japanese nation not only as the culmination of Buddhist cultural development, but also as a legitimating factor in Japanese imperial policies. In this context Buddhist nationalist movements and key figures such as the Zen teacher Sōen Shaku (1859–1919) often justified Japanese military expansionism in terms of the missionary spread of Buddhist teachings and the “upholding of humanity and civilization” (Soen; see Sharf). ]]
    https://www.encyclopedia.com/religion/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/colonialism-and-buddhism

  190. Art 说:
    @Patrick

    And so the afterlife of a soul was determined by how well the situation their descendants were in.

    So, if you steal enough money in your life – then you will stay alive in the memory of your ancestors – GREAT!

    Is that why the Chinese are notoriously money hungry and greedy? Is that why Chinese culture stops growing and stagnates after a point. Powerful moneyed oligarchs take control of Chinese culture – then they suppress innovation.

    In idealistic Christian Western culture – it is better to be known for your goodness and creativity – not your greed. The emphasis of Christian culture is on hope and the future – new life is venerated.

  191. anon[117]• 免责声明 说:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    1 The answer is : jizya.

    Yes it bis because the counterpart to that for Muslim is military service and yearly donation to the poor ( not for mosques ) at 3 percent of the income .

    2 -Roman emperor Constantine was not the founder of Christianity and figured as its “prophet” – yes you are right He like the killer Columbus was anointed saint
    Without these 2 none in the Europe outside Rome would have been Christian in Europe and none in America and you wont be talking about anything here .

    • 回复: @Seraphim
  192. As an ideology, it seems quite liberating.
    Had I been a Jew, I would not have this guilt and the heavy weight of good and evil on my shoulders.

    • 回复: @McAron
  193. @Vojkan

    It is like an atheistic person without a Christian or Muslim background but with support of his tribe/community. Such people used to get ostracized or excommunicated.
    Damn, these Jews have a head start of 3,000 years.

  194. McAron 说:
    @Rev. Spooner

    True, but you would have undergone circumcision at 8 days old, which would have left you permanently and irremediably traumatised. You probably would be quite neurotic, with a deeply repressed self-hate and a paranoid fear that the rest of the world is out to gaz-chamber you. I’d rather be a Goy.

    • 回复: @anarchyst
  195. Seraphim 说:
    @anon

    And without the killers Mahomed and his mass murderers ‘companions’ nobody would have been Mahomedan and the world would have been a better place.

  196. I take exception to the idea of ‘parasites’. In the same way, you can describe the king and the church as
    ‘parasites’. For a man who works in the field, it could look so, for him everybody who does not toil land is a ‘parasite’, if he is silly enough.
    Jews are an alternative church; you may dislike it, fine, but ‘parasite’ title is out of place.

    • 回复: @Laurent Guyénot
  197. anarchyst 说:
    @McAron

    Let’s not forget the long-lasting STDs that the jewish “mohel” infects the infant with by fellating the infant jew…

  198. JP 说:
    @Capt. Roy Harkness

    its message of universal love and brotherhood could arise from such a pestilential source must surely be proof of the existence of God.

    Universal love is a contradiction. To love is to hold something especially dear. There are 7 billion people on this world, if you love them all the same as you love your family it’s functionally no different from loving no one. If this idea was fully followed it would surely destroy society, and the closer we get to it the closer we are to annihilation, in the manner of The Camp of the Saints.

  199. @israel shamir

    Perhaps I shouldn’t have started with Henry Ford’s quote, to which you seem to object, because my topic is not “Jews”, but Israel as a whole. And Israel is not a king or a church, or a social body fulfilling a function within the nation. Israel is a nation in itself, living inside other nations. And I think the metaphore (it is nothing more than a metaphore) is accurate in two respects: First, the Mosaic covenant: how do you call a nation destined to “suck the milk of other nations”, if not parasitism? Second, the way Israel has taken control of the nervous system of the US and of its foreign policy: it is very much like something we find in the organic world.

    • 回复: @S
    , @McAron
    , @israel shamir
  200. S 说:
    @Laurent Guyénot

    I’d meant to post this earlier in this thread as it’s related to what you were saying here. It’s an excerpt of an October, 1870 article published in the then hugely influential Boston (US) based 大西洋月刊 entitled ‘Our Israelitish Brethren’.

    The title in more modern English would translate as ‘Our Jewish Brothers’ and is apparently a reflection of the unfortunate Anglo – Israelism ideology then present in New England.

    Note that it says that due to Jewish non-compliance with Roman Catholicism and Islam (‘superstitions’), but also the Jewish people’s ‘absorbing the wealth of every country in which they lived’ they were not tolerated in Portugal, Italy, and Morocco.

    While the Jewish people certainly should have been aided to the extent possible in finding a legitimate national home, is it not understandable that most peoples are not going to want another alien people living amongst them which (for whatever reason) ‘absorbs the wealth’ of the country?

    There was at the time (latter 19th century) a misguided belief amongst powerful elements of the Anglo-Saxon elites and hangers on of inherant A-S superiority to every other race and group, such that most all others would be changed to their will and be made Anglo-Saxons, both physically and psychologically.

    The possibility of the reverse occuring didn’t seem to occur to them.

    Atlantic Monthly (Oct, 1870) – ‘Our Israelitish Brethren’

    In 1492, under Ferdinand and Isabella, three hundred thousand heroic Israelites preferred exile to apostasy. Many of them found a resting-place only in the grave or in the depths of the sea; for neither Portugal nor Italy nor Mohammedan Morocco would tolerate the presence of a people who would not comply with their superstitions, and who, by their frugality, continence, temperance, and industry, absorbed the wealth of every country in which they lived.

    https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1870/10/our-israelitish-brethren/306257/

    • 回复: @Parfois1
    , @Laurent Guyénot
  201. Parfois1 说:
    @S

    Looks like the groundwork for Jewish supremacy was set earlier than I had supposed. On the other hand it fits the pattern of “follow the money’ trail: from Portugal, Spain and Italy (?), they moved to the centres of the then nascent mercantilism (Holland) followed by branching off to England and from there hitching a ride to America.

    Also notice the religious connection: they were expelled from Catholic countries (emphasis on New Testament) and thrived in the Protestant ones (relying more on O. T.).

  202. S 说:

    Also notice the religious connection: they were expelled from Catholic countries (emphasis on New Testament) and thrived in the Protestant ones (relying more on O. T.).

    Cromwell, ‘our chief of men’, and the Puritans, were practically living out of the Old Testament in 17th century England. It was the Puritans which largely settled New England, particularly Massachusetts, and it was this area of the United States which had a strong ‘American Israel’ belief present, ie the absurd idea that the A-S were the ‘lost tribes of Israel’, a manifestation of the lingering effects of the original Puritan colonization some two hundred years after the fact.

    It would explain why someone such as James Parton, an apparent Anglo-Saxon, could write this article in Boston, Mass, rather than a seemingly more logical article entitled ‘Our Germanic Brethren’.

    • 回复: @Seraphim
  203. McAron 说:
    @Laurent Guyénot

    how do you call a nation destined to “suck the milk of other nations”, if not parasitism?

    I suggest: vampirism. The vampire also gets immortal by sucking the vitality of mortals.

  204. @Laurent Guyénot

    Jews are wannabe Brahmins of our world; their main function is – like that of Indian Brahmins – to guide the nations. Sucking wealth is just a tool to allow for this guidance. This guidance can be perilous for others, yes, but that is the idea. That’s why the parasite metaphor is misleading.

  205. @israel shamir

    To “guide the nations” is not their function, but only their pretext given to the nations for sucking their milk. This “Israel as Messiah of the nations” paradigm is utter deception, and needs to be exposed as such. It is certainly not biblical anyway. How in the Book of Joshua, for example, did Israel guide the Canaanite peoples they proudly exterminated (reportedly)? The Pax Judaica prophecized in Isaiah means explicitly total submission of the nations to Zion (and destruction of the rebellious 7 nations). Even if the Jews had sincerely tried to guide the nations, they utterly failed, unless guiding them into world wars counts. No thanks for their “perillous” guidance.

    • 回复: @S
  206. @S

    Thanks. I’ll read this long article carefully. The love affair between the British aristocracy and the Jews, and the formers’ intense desire to be Jews, which gave birth to such strange theories as British Israelism (the British, or rather the Saxons being “Isaac’s sons” and the 10 lost tribes, etc.) would have fitted nicely in my previous article on the “Holy Hook” (https://www.unz.com/article/the-holy-hook/), about the Jewish Tanakh (Old Testament) as Jewish Power’s Trojan Horse into Gentility. I have a section about it in my book FromYahweh to Zion.

    • 回复: @S
  207. @israel shamir

    Shamir: “Jews are wannabe Brahmins”

    Stranger: Far too broad a generalization. Jews came in all flavors. Qualify your statement.

    Similarly with the opposite: “Jews are parasites”. The private central-bank-and-currency owners are certainlty parasites, and most are Jews. However most Jews are NOT private central-bank-and-currency owners.

  208. Hellene 说:

    FWIW, Greeks refer to themselves as ‘Ελλην’ (Hellenes) who are from ‘Ελλας,’ (Hellas) ie, Greece for westerners. Hellene is the son of Deukalionas and Pyrras. Hellene’s sons are the progenitors of the main Hellenic tribes. ‘Ell’ means light… So Israel is not the only nation who bears the name of one person.

    • 回复: @Laurent Guyénot
  209. S 说:
    @Laurent Guyénot

    Yes, it’s an intriguing article well worth the time to read.

    I found the below excerpt of particular interest in regard to the emboldened portion regarding Andersonville, which appeared at the start of a long list of other alleged atrocities.

    The things is, the referenced accusations regarding ‘planned’ mass murder at the South’s Andersonville POW camp are now, albeit quietly, generally acknowledged to have been fraudulent. The associated ‘trial’ of its commanding officer, the solitary and hapless Henry Wirz, which resulted in his execution, is widely seen as having been a complete farce. Wirz himself is seen as having been a scapegoat for Northern picque regarding its huge wartime losses.

    What is sometimes referred to as the ‘Black Legend’ (Black Propaganda?) in regards to Spain’s history has now also come into widespread serious question and dispute as to the actual validity of the claims.

    It all just begs the question.

    This is not to say that bad and terrible things don’t happen historically to be avoided as best possible. There’s a big difference, however, when a bad automobile 事故 takes place between two vehicles, both parties involved losing someone precious, and taking this same bad accident and accusing one or the other of the parties involved of being 谋杀者 in a deliberate effort to run someone off the road.

    A 黑色传奇 is a historiographical phenomenon in which a sustained trend in historical writing of biased reporting and introduction of fabricated, exaggerated and/or decontextualized facts is directed against particular persons, nations or institutions with the intention of creating a distorted and uniquely inhuman image of them while hiding their positive contributions to history.

    “在过去的十个世纪中,他们(犹太人民)遭受的巨大错误中,巨大的安德森维尔(Andersonville)暴行,很少需要提醒读者。”

    大西洋月刊(1870 年 XNUMX 月)——我们的以色列弟兄会

    ‘Of the giant wrongs to which they [the Jewish people] have been subjected for the last ten centuries,—the huge Andersonville outrages,—few readers need to be reminded. In the slaughter of the Jews of Seville, in 1391, thirty-five hundred families were murdered. In 1492, under Ferdinand and Isabella, three hundred thousand heroic Israelites preferred exile to apostasy. Many of them found a resting-place only in the grave or in the depths of the sea…’

    ‘..The favorite office of the Spanish Inquisition for two centuries was to “question” the sincerity of those two hundred thousand Jewish converts; and the national amusement was to witness the burning of Jewish Rabbis and Jewish maidens. Similar atrocities were committed, as we all know, in England, Germany, and France.’

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Legend

    https://www.britannica.com/topic/Black-Legend

    https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1870/10/our-israelitish-brethren/306257/

  210. Art 说:
    @israel shamir

    Jews are wannabe Brahmins of our world; their main function is – like that of Indian Brahmins – to guide the nations.

    That is mythological BS.

    Really — “to guide the nations” – what have the Brahmins brought India? A shameless hierarchy, cow worship, and endless poverty?

    Really — “to guide the nations” – what have the Jews brought the West but cultural disintegration, wars, and endless debt?

    Parasites have different DNA then their host – some parasites form a symbiotic relationship with their host. Some parasites take over their host and make their host sick.

    Clearly Jews claim a different DNA – and clearly, they attempt to take over their host, making their host sick. See America today.

    Parasite is an appt word to describe the Jews and their culture in the West.

    不要伤害—艺术

    • 回复: @Professional Stranger
  211. DinoN 说:

    After reading most of the comments, I had to take a Strong Drink! I can’t believe that people could waste so much time fighting about GOD & Religion. I believe that GOD wants us to be, at least good and I take “do unto others as would have them do unto you” very seriously. GOD, who ever he is, Bless everyone for doing Good & Punish those who do Evil.

  212. @Art

    艺术: Parasite is an appt word to describe the Jews and their culture in the West

    Stranger: The parasite is the group of private central bank owners. And they are all Jews. However, remember, not all Jews are private central bank owners.
    .
    COMMENT: CONTROL of its HOST, and DISGUISE of its presence is the goal of every PARASITE

    [更多]

    ● FOR EXAMPLE: The private-currency Ponzi-scheme PARASITE. In 1913 with “Federal”-Reserve act America formally became a HOST of the PARASITE. The PARASITE now CONTROLLED its HOST’s currency. And he who pays the piper calls the tune. So the PARASITE CONTROLLED the HOST nation’s government, too.
    Using this CONTROL, the PARASITE then drafted ITS HOST into its service as their Foreign Legion.
    The deal with America was: we would fight all their wars of financial colonial expansion, and they would give us a credit card that we would pay for their wars on.
    But for the PARASITE it was still a freebie.
    👉The PARASITE’s plan was always to destroy its HOST, the credit card and all the debt on it, about 100 years later. And that time is NOW!

    ● FOR ANOTHER EXAMPLE: http://mentalfloss.com/article/17636/6-horrifying-parasites-kevin-federline-isnt-one-them
    [[A female sacculina neatorama PARASITE “injects” herself into the crab.. Once inside, the jellylike sacculina starts to take over. She grows until eventually she pops out of the top of the crab, and from this knobby protrusion, she will steer the Good Ship Unlucky Crab for the rest of their co-mingled life. Packed full of parasite, the crab will forgo its own needs to serve those of its master. It won’t molt, grow reproductive organs, or attempt to reproduce. It won’t even regrow appendages, as healthy crabs can. Rather than waste the nutrients on itself, a HOST crab will hobble along and continue to look for food with which to feed its PARASITE master.]]

    ● THE PARALLEL: Just as the saccullina PARASITE CONTROLS its HOST the crab by steering it to serve the PARASITE’S interests, so the private-currency Ponzi-scheme PARASITE CONTROLS its HOST America by steering it into wars. All the wars we have ever fought since the PARASITE infected us in 1913, have been in the PARASITE’s interest, never our own.

    -

    Re: “The Essence of Control Is Its CONCEALMENT – selective and psychologically comforting concealment sanitizes the manipulation”

    COMMENT: CONCEALMENT is the main form of defense of every PARASITE.

    ● FOR EXAMPLE: The private-currency Ponzi-scheme PARASITE. In America they call their banks FEDERAL-Reserve banks, and their currency FEDERAL-Reserve Notes. The “FEDERAL” part is to suggest FEDERAL-government and CONCEAL the fact they are PRIVATE. And their FEDERAL-Reserve Notes look just like FEDERAL-government notes – more CONCEALMENT.

    ● FOR ANOTHER EXAMPLE, click this link:
    [[Cymothoa exigua PARASITE enters the HOST fish and REPLACES it’s tongue .. and CONCEALS the job by the PARASITE’s body looking just like the HOST’s original tongue.]]

    ● THE PARALLEL:
    The private-currency Ponzi-scheme PARASITE enters a HOST nation and REPLACES the HOST’s currency. The PARASITE CONCEALS the operation by making its currency look just like the HOST’s original currency.

    ● AND THE CONCEALMENT WORKS: 99% of Americans don’t know the parasite exists.

    ● BUT OCCASIONALLY THE PARASITE BLOWS ITS OWN CONCEALMENT:
    Here, the Federal Reserve describes itself as “an independent entity within the government”, which is the classic definition of a PARASITE: one independent entity living within another. Click this.. http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/duke20110202a.htm

    • 回复: @Art
    , @BengaliCanadianDude
  213. S 说:
    @Laurent Guyénot

    To “guide the nations” is not their function, but only their pretext given to the nations for sucking their milk. This “Israel as Messiah of the nations” paradigm is utter deception, and needs to be exposed as such. It is certainly not biblical anyway.

    What you are referring to here, ie Tikkun Olam, ‘repairing the world’, is a variant of what I call a part of the ‘dynamics of empire’.

    No individual or people likes to tell themselves when they are engaged in empire building, ie obtaining ever more wealth and power at typically someone else’s great expense, that what they are in reality doing is lying, cheating, stealing…murder, in order to do so.

    They also don’t like to look at their own motivations, which are typically not pretty, ie selfishness, greed, lust for power, etc.

    Instead, they engage in self deception in an attempt to rationalize it away, and tell themselves the people(s) which are targeted to be on the receiving end of the empire building are ‘barbarians’ who need to be ‘civilized’, ie ‘repaired’ if you will in other words…though the ‘barbarians’ typically already have their own civilization which they are often enough content with already.

    Too many of those amongst the empire builder’s own people who may not be personally profiting from the endeavor simply go along and stay quiet.

    Protests by those on the receiving end are received with bewilderment and disregarded by the empire builders, who tell themselves the mindless barbarians don’t know what’s best for themselves, that indeed, they unconsciuosly in reality desire to be a part of the empire.

    The roads and bridges built are said to be unilateral ‘gifts’ to the uncivilized when in reality it is to facilitate the targeted country’s resources being looted.

    This is a bad business historically which many a people often to their ultimate great sorrow have engaged in.

    They too in a great many instances told themselves that theirs was a heaven sent mission.

    Are not the Jewish people involved, ie Barbara Spectre amongst others with their Tikkun Olam rationalization for ‘multi-culturalism’ and its prerequisite ‘mass immigration’, and now having their own secure homeland, engaging in something like empire building?

    Just below is a gold ‘stater’ coin issued by Vercingetorix and his Gauls in what is present day France.

    This coin was issued before the ‘barbarian’ Gauls were ‘civilized’ with the Roman version of Tikkun Olam.

    Below that are four additional images of coins minted by the Romans celebrating victory after many tens of thousands of Gauls had been slaughtered and enslaved, their civilization largely destroyed, and Vercingetorix captured. This was all for the Gauls own good so as to ‘civilize’ and ‘repair’ them.

    The one at the bottom right hand corner is Vercingetorix trussed up as a war trophy. After years of imprisonment at Rome he would be executed via ritual strangulation, also for his own good, naturally.

    Nowadays it is thought the Gallic Wars were fought in large part because Rome simply desired direct ownership and control of Gaul’s rich gold mines.

    It’s said by those compelled to engage in empire building that the uncivilized barbarians need ‘guidance’, but isn’t it the empire builders themselves, who ever they might be, irregardless of whether you call the end product ’empire’ or ‘world union’, who are in reality the barbarians, uncivilized, and likely themselves more than anybody in need of ‘guidance’ and ‘repair’?


    Gallic Vercingetorix gold stater coin


    Roman Vercingetorix coins after Gallic defeat

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vercingetorix

    • 回复: @Seraphim
    , @Laurent Guyénot
  214. S 说:

    I’ll add here, there is another way (in part) to effect conquest.

    If a people had very high intelligence, significantly higher than a particular other group of people, it could be done. Not suggesting it would be moral (I don’t think it would be) but if this highly intelligent people could convince this targeted less intelligent people everyone was the same (ie ‘equal’) and convinced the targeted people to allow the more intelligent people to live amongst them, all whilst the more intelligent people maintained their identity, the more intelligent people would in time tend to dominate over the less intelligent one.

    If elements of this less intelligent people attempted to protest their being dominated, they could be supressed by being called ‘haters’, ‘racist’, etc. After all everyone is the same..ie ‘equal’, and distinct identity doesn’t really exist.. Under cover of stated spiritual belief, when this intelligent people is accused of (in effect) being a race, they could say ‘nonsense’ and claim to be ‘merely a religion.’

    This more intelligent, though not necessarily more moral people, could be doing this acting under self deception, and or with various things they might tell themselves to seemingly excuse it, but that doesn’t make it okay or right.

    If north-west Europeans, ie ‘Whites’, could have done this with Africa and its people in the 19th century, they’d still be running and controlling things there today.

    I wouldn’t be for that though as it wouldn’t be moral, in addition to my thinking empires are in general a bad business, no matter how one might attempt to rationalize away the conquest of others.

    • 回复: @Anon
  215. Seraphim 说:
    @S

    Are you sure that the Gaulois (or other Cimbro-Teutonic barbarians) were not engaged in ’empire building’ themselves? The looting expeditions of the Celts were legendary in Antiquity and predate Roman imperialism by a few centuries. They were amongst the ‘Sea Peoples’, if not the leaders.
    The ‘Celts’ were warlike peoples, brigands and pirates, far from the ‘victims’ of the ‘selfishness, greed, lust for power’ of the Romans, far from ‘content with what they had already’. They were animated by the same ‘selfishness, greed, lust for power’ like the Romans. Were not these peoples who gave birth to predatory ‘capitalism’?

    • 回复: @S
  216. S 说:
    @Seraphim

    I wasn’t suggesting the Gauls were ‘pure as the driven snow’. I think several hundred years prior to the Gallic Wars of Caeser the Celts (of which the Gauls are certainly a part) had invaded Northern Italy and sacked Rome. Might have been the Gauls themselves who did that.

    The point being made was that empires are terribly destructive, for both those on the receiving end, and ultimately for the ’empire builders’ themselves. That was all.

    As for ‘predatory capitalism’ I don’t know who gave birth to it. I think in modern times there was Adam Smith’s famous book in 1776, the ‘capitalist bible’, which I see making into an inhuman science commerce, at least how it’s been applied.

    I see that though as part of a larger manufactured dialectic with the creation in 1789 (the French Revolution) of Capitalism’s controlled counter-revolution, what in time would be called Communism.

    I don’t see ‘greed’ or ‘predatory Capitalism’, as belonging to just one people.

    Ancient Rome had the billionaire Marcus Crassus, who bought up real estate in all sorts of extremely unscrupolous ways it is said. I imagine there’s plenty of others like that around the world then, and now.

  217. Seraphim 说:

    As was for long suggested by Max Weber in his seminal book “The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism”, the ethic of capitalism which got rid of the precept of ‘love thy neighbor’ and made a virtue out of greed, was forged by Protestantism which spread among the Germano-Celtic peoples, copiously fecundated by Jewish money.

    • 回复: @S
  218. hamtok 说:
    @Ilya G Poimandres

    De-indoctrination probably wouldn’t work – it’s in the genes. Radical surgery is called for.

  219. hamtok 说:

    Very erudite and convincing thesis and liberally supported examples from life.

  220. Seraphim 说:
    @Kevin Barrett

    Islam not only disagrees, but actually condemns Christ’s divine message which is:
    “I AM the light of the world: he that followeth me shall not walk in darkness, but shall have the light of life… Father, the hour is come; glorify thy Son, that thy Son also may glorify thee: 2 As thou hast given him power over all flesh, that he should give eternal life to as many as thou hast given him. 3 And this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent. 4 I have glorified thee on the earth: I have finished the work which thou gavest me to do. 5 And now, O Father, glorify thou me with thine own self with the glory which I had with thee before the world was. 6 I have manifested thy name unto the men which thou gavest me out of the world: thine they were, and thou gavest them me; and they have kept thy word. 7 Now they have known that all things whatsoever thou hast given me are of thee. 8 For I have given unto them the words which thou gavest me; and they have received them, and have known surely that I came out from thee, and they have believed that thou didst send me. 9 I pray for them: I pray not for the world, but for them which thou hast given me; for they are thine. 10 And all mine are thine, and thine are mine; and I am glorified in them.”.
    The Christ did not come to ‘save the European civilization’. Mahomed came to destroy it.
    You are a sorely deluded chap (and ignorant on top of that) who paves his own way to join Mahomed in the eighth bolgia of the hell where Dante put Mahomed.
    As for the asinine idea that Dante ‘plagiarized’ the story of the fake ascent of Mahomed to heaven you must read what Dante said about Mahomed:

    “Even a cask with bottom or sides knocked out
    Never cracked so wide as one soul I saw
    Burst open from the chin to where one farts.

    His guts were hanging out between his legs;
    His pluck gaped forth and that disgusting sack
    Which turns to shit what throats have gobbled down.

    While I was all agog with gazing at him,
    He stared at me and, as his two hands pulled
    His chest apart, cried, “Look how I rip myself!

    Look at how mangled is Mohammed here!
    In front of me, Ali treks onward, weeping,
    His face cleft from his chin to his forelock.

    And all the others whom you see down here
    Were sowers of scandal and schism while
    They lived, and for this they are rent in two.

    But there is time for you to come to your senses and repent.

  221. S 说:
    @Seraphim

    Yes, I read the book years back. Weber presents a brilliant and well stated thesis.

    • 回复: @Seraphim
  222. Art 说:
    @Professional Stranger

    Stranger: The parasite is the group of private central bank owners. And they are all Jews. However, remember, not all Jews are private central bank owners.

    It is true – not all Jews are central bankers – it is true that many Jews if not most Jews, lead moral Western business lives – BUT it is also true that politically, most Jews support the parasitic money changers and bankers in their quest to control society.

    Because they fear society, Jews cannot resist the urge to control society. Look at America today under Jew control – we have become dangerously dysfunctional. Our freedoms and good will for each other are being lost. We have a buffoon for a president, who squanders our good name away on the Jews.

    不要伤害—艺术

    p.s. See Fred Reed’s article today – most all that US dysfunction can be traced back to Jew advocacy politics.

  223. anarchyst 说:

    Wait till the first trial for “holocaust denial” takes place here in “the good ol’ USA”. It’s coming…in the guise of a “hate crime”…

  224. Anon[724]• 免责声明 说:
    @S

    If north-west Europeans, ie ‘Whites’, could have done this with Africa and its people in the 19th century, they’d still be running and controlling things there today.

    Having the same (or almost the same) skin colour influences greatly the feasibility of “that”, I think.

    But also… doing that to a people vulnerable to narcissistic addiction to virtue signalling facilitates “that” a lot, I think.

    And finally (finally and frankly): I have been in a lot of walks of life… online and offline interactions with single girls and women (but also the sporadic group of them) as well as with groups of men. There were no Jews at all involved.
    But immorality, and behaviour-moralizing rationalisations, where everywhere, all of the time: or more precisely where wherever the need arose, any time it did.
    You had the thirst for dominance, you had the eagerness to deny responsibility, you had the promise-breaking, and you had all the rationalized, shared and cherished, untruths that make all of that doable on a regular basis while everyone except the 失败者失败者 being who likes to act morally and expects the others to act the same as they talk) feels upright and stays group-approved (indeed, it’s the 失败者 who is blamed).

    This idea that one group acts immorally, and the others, on the contrary, act morally is itself self-deception.
    It helps not to confront certain realities about one’s “identity group” or humankind in general.

    For example if the central banks, and “who controls money” derive from this huge power over society, that can be only due to money being a God to so many people… of all races, and certainly whites or “whites”.

    Then you have “intellectuals” who will quote with approbation a thing like

    The great error of individualistic psychology is the supposition that man thinks.

    and overlook to answer the commenter bringing up the question whether who writes a thing like that and who quotes it favourably believe themselves not thinking, not men, or — perhaps? But in that case, why not say it? — men of an outstanding, select kind.

    Issues are many-sided, and the more complete, reality-penetrating explanations are never the quick, comfortable ones.

    • 回复: @S
    , @Laurent Guyénot
  225. S 说:
    @Anon

    A lot of good stuff there. Plenty of responsibility to share for the present situation. And I very much think self deception ‘across the board’ helps to explain how things got to be where they are now.

  226. Seraphim 说:
    @S

    You must complete the thesis of Weber with those of Werner Sombart:
    “Die Juden und das Wirtschaftsleben (The Jews and Modern Capitalism)”, 1911.
    “Der Bourgeois (translated as ‘The quintessence of capitalism’)”, 1913.

  227. @Anon

    Then you have “intellectuals” who will quote with approbation a thing like

    The great error of individualistic psychology is the supposition that man thinks.

    and overlook to answer the commenter bringing up the question

    Did I overlook answering you? My apololgies. I was busy writing my next article. Well, here is my answer: nobody is supposed to take Gumplowicz’s quote here too seriously. I certainly don’t. It is just the point of view of sociology, which is a limited point of view like all others. It is meant to underline that part of our thinking is collective. Thanks for reading me.

  228. Seraphim 说:
    @S

    It would suggest that the ‘strange theories as British Israelism’ were taking foot in America. And from its very beginning in 1590 when the French Hugenot magistrate M. le Loyer’s published “The Ten Lost Tribes” this ‘strange theory’ asserted that the “Anglo-Saxon, Celtic, Scandinavian, Germanic, and associated cultures” were direct descendants of the ancient Israelites.
    In 1840 John Wilson, published “Our Israelitish Origin” work deemed to be the first full-blown thesis connecting the Anglo-Saxons to ancient Israel.
    That’s why James Parton would talk about our ‘Israelitish brethren’ rather than Germanic.
    ‘White nationalism’ owes much to British Israelism.

  229. @S

    What you are referring to here, ie Tikkun Olam, ‘repairing the world’, is a variant of what I call a part of the ‘dynamics of empire’.

    I’ll check that out. But what I was refering is this, which is obviously related (quote from my book):
    Reformed Judaism promoted a messianic theory that continued to ascribe an exalted role to Israel as chosen people, nation or race. German-American rabbi Kaufmann Kohler, a star of the Pittsburgh Conference, argued in his Jewish Theology (1918) for the recycling of the messianic hope into “the belief that Israel, the suffering Messiah of the centuries, shall at the end of days become the triumphant Messiah of the nations.” “Israel is the champion of the Lord, chosen to battle and suffer for the supreme values of mankind, for freedom and justice, truth and humanity; the man of woe and grief, whose blood is to fertilize the soil with the seeds of righteousness and love for mankind. […] Accordingly, modern Judaism proclaims more insistently than ever that the Jewish people is the Servant of the Lord, the suffering Messiah of the nations, who offered his life as an atoning sacrifice for humanity and furnished his blood as the cement with which to build the divine kingdom of truth and justice.” (Kaufmann Kohler, Jewish Theology, Systematically and Historically Considered, Macmillan, 1918, on http://www.gutenberg.org, pp. 290, 378–380)

    • 回复: @S
    , @Ronny
  230. S 说:
    @Laurent Guyénot

    Thanks for clarifying. As you say it’s ‘related’ to ‘Tikkun Olam’.

    It appears most every people when they go conquering (or ’empire building’) has a rationalization for their actions that they tell themselves, some of the rationalizations (self-deceptions?) it would seem are just more elaborate than others.

    • 回复: @Seraphim
  231. Seraphim 说:
    @S

    It is clear that the mythology of the ‘Holocaust’ was elaborated before the actual event.
    “Jewish people is the Servant of the Lord, the suffering Messiah of the nations, who offered his life as an atoning sacrifice for humanity and furnished his blood as the cement with which to build the divine kingdom of truth and justice.”
    Of course the ‘Servant of the Lord’ was the Christ. But Jews still wait for their Messiah.

  232. @Professional Stranger

    The parasite is the group of private central bank owners

    Sure they are a major problem, but they aren’t solely the problem. There are others…..who happen to be JEWS

    • 回复: @Professional Stranger
  233. @BengaliCanadianDude

    Stranger: The parasite is the group of private central bank owners. And they are all Jews. However, remember, not all Jews are private central bank owners.

    Bengal: Sure they are a major problem, but they aren’t solely the problem. There are others…..who happen to be JEWS

    Central Bankers are not the only class of parasite, there are other classes of parasite too. The point here is: many members of many parasite classes are Jews, but not all Jews are members of any parasite class.

    例如:
    (1) About .00000001% of Jews are central-bank owners, however
    (2) Jews have a disproportionately high representation among DENTISTS.

    Also see my Comment 61, for the effect of Jewish sects on this.

    • 回复: @Seraphim
  234. @AaronB

    THAT’S actual Judaism, that’s what modern Jews are ACTUALLY inspired by.
    ==============================
    I’ve read the Talmud.
    THAT’S ACTUAL JUDAISM. THAT IS WHAT MODERN JEWS ARE ACTUALLY INSPIRED BY.

    You are a blowheart.

  235. Druid 说:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    Armies conquered during those times. That is true.
    Mohammad didn’t conquer outside of Arabia. He fought defensive wars against those that persecuted and tried to kill him and his followers. His share of the “booty” didn’t build him and expensive house or an advanced computer – it was spent on helping the poor and his people. You know nothing!
    Look at your crusades, then open your mouth. More Christians were killed in the first crusade than all Muslims together in all crusades. I could go on and on but I’m done with a moron !

  236. Druid 说:
    @refl

    Anyone who believes in Talmud is sick. No other forms of Jews. They’re all scum, like AaronB arrogant!

  237. Druid 说:
    @AaronB

    Yup, keep the ugly niahide laws, let us enslave you to the tune of 2550 slaves for each of us “chosen” ny yhwh, our satanic deity, work for us, and you’ll have relatively peace. Thanks, masa!

  238. Nuncle 说:

    ‘Christianity is unfriendly, to say the least, to the concept of race.’

    This is one reason why the demise of Christianity cannot be a bad thing.

  239. By stating this dear sir , you are admitting to working for those that call themselves jews either by ignorance or some other reason .

    “It is impossible, I think, to come to any simple conclusion about the merits and failures of Christianity, because we cannot objectively distinguish what belongs to Christianity and what doesn’t in any of Christendom’s achievements. No civilization can prosper without a public religion. Whether another religion could have done better for Christendom than Christianity is a futile question. What part Christianity played in the decline and fall of Christendom is equally meaningless. Yet the challenges faced by our civilization today require serious anthropological inquiries into Christianity’s legacy and deficiencies, and a quest for remedies.”

    You dear sir are ignorant that Jesus Christ’s church will eventually become this

    For he must reign, till he hath put all enemies under his feet.
    And the seventh angel sounded; and there were great voices in heaven, saying, The kingdoms of this world are become the kingdoms of our Lord, and of his Christ; and he shall reign for ever and ever

    What clearer way to distinguish the enemies (goats) than to offer said enemies a carrot to a old false way of believing (fake israel ) ?

    Either love peace or join the jews who love to hate

  240. Ronny 说:
    @Laurent Guyénot

    你说:

    >>>”Usury is the quintessential parasitizing, and as far as I know, the Yahwist priests were the first to conceive of enslaving entire nations through debt: “If Yahweh your God blesses you as he has promised, you will be creditors to many nations but debtors to none; you will rule over many nations, and be ruled by none” (Deuteronomy 15:6).”

    Read David Astles book titled the ‘Babylonian Woe’ and then the book ‘Monarchy or Money Power’ which can be bought on Omnia Veritas publishing co. or in PDF form on 山口网.

    These two books alone illustrate that the money power was well on their way to control society through usury well before the Jews and well before the old testement was written and well before the Talmud. From Heliopolis where an oblisk is erected to Sumer and on. Start with Astle’s book as he spent a mighty amount of time in public archives.

  241. lydia 说:
    @Robert Dolan

    Sheen explains complex things in an almost poetic sense, he paints pictures with words that stay with you long after.

    I have read many many books of his, but this is one of his best. But I also must include a warning, this is not for a first time reader. Before you take this one read The Life of Christ so you can apply his teachings in an orderly manner.

    For we can’t apply Algebra before we even learn the concept of numbers.

    This language is not difficult, but you can reap greater rewards is you have for than a rudimentary knowledge of Christ.

    This is a keeper for sure.

    explains in his introduction that there hasn’t been a definitive study on the Church since the Reformation. He attributes this to a lack of persecution. You have no need to define yourself; defend yourself when someone isn’t questioning, doubting, or persecuting you. It makes sense.

    The book begins with an explanation of the Church through the lens of Jesus Christ. There is no better place to start than this, because the two cannot be separated. Sheen begins by explaining the three phases of the Life of Christ – the earthly life, the glorified life, and the mystical life.

    He then devotes an entire chapter to the Mystical Body of Christ. This is a long chapter with a lot of spiritual meat to chew on. I found myself reading and re-reading passages to try and digest the topic more fully, and I truly believe I could go back and re-read that chapter and still gain more and more from it.

    For example, Sheen instructs us that, “Christ and His Mystical Body make but one Mystical Person. A Mystical Person has a double existence: one in Himself as Head of the Mystical Body, and the other in the Body of the faithful who receive his Life.”

    Read that several times and let it sink in. The following chapters then more fully discuss Christ as Head of the Body and the Holy Spirit as the Soul of the Church. Other chapters talk about infallibility, authority of the Church, priesthood, and Mary, just to name a few of the 28 chapters.

    The chapter entitled “The Sacrifice of the Mystical Body” was a very beautiful chapter on Christ’s Crucifixion. Sheen begins by explaining that before most men die, they prepare a last will or testament. Jesus instituted a memorial of His sacrifice in the form of the Eucharist.

    He goes on to explain that the Mass is more than a memorial service of Christ’s sacrifice on the Cross, but is instead the sacrifice on the Cross. Sheen also explains that the offertory of the Mass is a co-offering of Christ and us and the consecration is also a co-consecration of Jesus and us. Sheen goes on to say,

    “Calvary, then, is the source of Divine Life; the altar is the canal.

    Calvary is the Treasury of merit; the Mass is its application;

    Calvary is the reservoir of Grace; the Mass is the open flood-gates pouring it into our souls.”

    When I received this book, I was expecting some practical theology from the original television evangelist. However, this book was written well before his time on the airwaves, and when he was still a professor at Catholic University of America (CUA). Thus, this book provides an astonishing glimpse at his theological genius.

当前评论者
说:

发表评论-对超过两周的文章发表评论,将在质量和语气上进行更严格的判断


 记得 我的信息为什么?
 电子邮件回复我的评论
$
提交的评论已被许可给 Unz评论 并可以由后者自行决定在其他地方重新发布
在翻译模式下禁用评论
通过RSS订阅此评论主题 通过RSS订阅所有LaurentGuyénot评论