Unz评论•另类媒体选择$
美国主流媒体大都排除了有趣,重要和有争议的观点
 托马斯·道尔顿档案馆
第一次世界大战中六百万犹太人的大屠杀
通过电子邮件将此页面发送给其他人

 记住我的信息



=>

书签 全部切换总目录添加到图书馆从图书馆中删除 • B
显示评论下一个新评论下一个新回复了解更多
回复同意/不同意/等等 更多... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
同意不同意谢谢LOL轮唱
这些按钮可将您的公开协议,异议,感谢,LOL或巨魔与所选注释一起注册。 仅对最近使用“记住我的信息”复选框保存姓名和电子邮件的频繁评论者可用,并且在任何八个小时的时间内也只能使用三次。
忽略评论者 关注评论者
搜寻文字 区分大小写  确切的词  包括评论
列表 书签

我认为读者熟悉所谓的大屠杀的基础知识:据称在二战期间,大约 XNUMX 万犹太人死于纳粹手中,其中许多人在毒气室中死亡。 我们被告知,这是希特勒和他的高级官员的一项深思熟虑的政策,是最优先考虑的——甚至高于战争努力本身——并且是一项极其保密的政策。 事实上,它是如此秘密,以至于几乎不存在关于这一灾难性的、改变世界的事件的硬文件和法医证据:没有杀死犹太人的“希特勒命令”,没有毒气室杀人的计划,没有毒气室的实物残骸,[1]他们在奥斯威辛集中营、马伊达内克和达豪向游客展示的那些所谓的毒气室是战后重建的,不可能用作使用毒气的大规模杀戮场所。 详情见我的书。 没有毒气室或被毒死的犹太人的照片,没有确认被毒气致死的尸检,没有一致或连贯的大规模枪击记录,总人数必须超过 1.5 万,没有任何证据表明大约 1 万犹太人死亡。 那些聪明的恶魔,纳粹,为了掩盖他们的罪恶行径,设法摧毁了所有的证据——包括几乎所有六百万犹太人尸体的残骸。 他们是真正的邪恶天才。 或者我们被告知。

但这不是我今天的主题。 对于令人难以置信的第二次世界大战大屠杀的完整故事,我必须将感兴趣的读者推荐给我的书 大屠杀:简介 (对于简洁的版本),或者,对于更详细的讨论, 辩论大屠杀:双方都焕然一新 (4th 编,2020)。还推荐了 Germar Rudolf 的书, 大屠杀讲座 (2017)。 可以说,我们友好的“大屠杀专家”宁愿让我们不知道这一臭名昭著的事件的许多事实。

不过,今天,我想关注一个相关但也许更令人惊讶的事件:第一次世界大战的犹太人“大屠杀”。(我将使用小写的“大屠杀”表示二战前,保留大写的“大屠杀” '对于二战本身。)

稍等, 你说; 第一次世界大战? 但这不是在二战前几十年发生的吗?是的。那不是在纳粹党存在之前的几年吗?真是的。在最初的战争中,希特勒不只是一个步兵吗?他确实是。那么谁犯了罪呢?为什么?有多少犹太人在 大屠杀?

这确实是一个了不起的故事,一个鲜为人知的故事。 人们常说“历史会重演”。 但是谁能想到,像大屠杀这样具有纪念意义的悲惨事件会在短短三年内重演,发生在世界同一地区,同样数量的人身上? 这个惊人的事件值得一探究竟; 第一次世界大战的大屠杀对二战的大屠杀,进而对当今世界的犹太人与外邦人的关系产生了巨大的影响。

战争背景

第一次世界大战的前兆和起因浩大而复杂,这里我无法深入探讨。 但一个关键因素,也可能是决定性因素,是当时全球犹太游说团体的行动,它在每一个可能的时刻都在推动战争。 我在我的书中详细介绍了这方面 世界大战中的犹太手 (2019),我推荐感兴趣的读者参考它。 事实证明,同一个犹太大厅在大屠杀叙事中也发挥了决定性作用。

目前,我将不得不将自己限制在基本事实上。 我们记得,第一次世界大战始于 1914 年 11 月,持续了四年多,于 1918 年 1917 月 1918 日结束。在这段时间的大部分时间里,英国、法国和俄罗斯的三国协约国与德国、奥匈帝国和意大利的三国同盟。 美国最终于 1918 年 8 月参战(站在协约国一边)。被犹太-布尔什维克革命撕裂的俄罗斯于 10 年 XNUMX 月撤出。德国又坚持了七个月,但最终在 XNUMX 年 XNUMX 月,它太屈服了,部分是由于内部犹太人的骚动,。 最终,联盟总伤亡人数约为 XNUMX 万(军人加平民),协约国伤亡人数约为 XNUMX 万。 尽管有许多复杂的因素,战败的德国最终被归咎于这场战争——完全忽视了这个国家“没有策划一场欧洲战争,不想要一场欧洲战争,并做出真正的……努力避免一场战争”的事实。历史学家西德尼·费伊的话。[2]正如费伊对战争的“经典研究”所引用的那样, 世界大战的起源 (1928),p。 552。 对德国造成的沉重的战后赔款在很大程度上为后来希特勒和他的 NSDAP 政党的出现奠定了基础。

与所有战争一样,许多平民都被瞄准了; 在这里,犹太人也不例外。 然而,他们的苦难在战前已经持续了很多年。 或者我们应该说, 造成的 痛苦。 几个世纪以来,甚至数千年来,犹太人的行为、态度、行动和信仰一直是冲突的根源。[3]对于这个故事,请参阅我的书 永恒的陌生人 (2020)。 到 18 世纪末,犹太人的粗暴变得尤为紧迫th 正如许多著名批评家所指出的那样,包括康德、伏尔泰、黑格尔、费希特和赫尔德。 到 19 年中旬th 世纪,叔本华和布鲁诺鲍尔等人发表了严厉的批评。

然而,一个特别令人不安的情况正在俄罗斯发展。 到 1800 年代后期,俄罗斯境内有大约 5 万犹太人,几乎所有人都生活在该国最西部的所谓的定居点中。 这约占全球约 10 万犹太人总数的一半。 庞大的犹太人口在俄罗斯内部是一股破坏性和煽动性的力量,因此赢得了沙皇尼古拉一世(1825 年至 1855 年在位)和亚历山大二世(1855 年至 1881 年在位)的厌恶。 到 1871 年,俄罗斯活动家米哈伊尔·巴枯宁可以对犹太人做出这样的观察:

这整个犹太世界构成了一个单一的剥削教派,一种吸血鬼民族(蓝精灵),集体寄生虫(einzigen fressenden 寄生虫),贪婪的,本身就组织起来的,不仅跨越国界,甚至跨越所有政治观点的分歧——这个世界目前,至少在很大程度上,一方面由马克思支配,另一方面由罗斯柴尔德家族支配。另一个。 ......犹太人的团结,在整个历史中一直保持着自己的强大团结,将他们[两者]团结在一起。[4]在 Wheen 中引用, 卡尔·马克思 (1999),p。 340。

1881 年,一个名为 Narodnaya Volya 的无政府主义者团伙,其中包括一些犹太人,成功暗杀了亚历山大。 这引发了一系列持续数十年的反犹太大屠杀。

到 1880 年代后期,美国媒体开始关注俄罗斯的犹太人状况——尤其是 “纽约时报”. 1889 年的一个简短项目以“那里有多少犹太人?”这个问题开头。 意义,全球。 至少,“无处不在的种族的数量[是] 6,000,000。” 然后它继续提到犹太人的苦难:“除了 4,000,000 万之外,他们都处于政治束缚的状态。” 此外,“仅在俄罗斯就有 XNUMX 人的种族,他们的每一步都被诅咒、宗教仇恨和迫害所困扰。”[5]10 月 14 日,第XNUMX. 在这里,我们发现早期提到(几乎)六百万受苦的犹太人。

另一篇短文出现在 1891 年,题为“俄罗斯的基督教:拉比戈特伊尔谈到了对犹太人的迫害”。 在一次公开演讲中,戈泰尔研究了一些“与俄罗斯基督徒人口对 5,000,000 至 6,000,000 名犹太人的待遇有关的事实”。 值得注意的是,两年前只有 4 万的俄罗斯犹太人人口现在已高达 6 万。 Gottheil 然后继续引用一位 EB Lanin 最近的一篇文章,他说:“大约 XNUMX 万 [原文如此] 受迫害和悲惨的可怜人仍然坚定地忠于使他们的生活变成火炉的宗教。”[6]26 月 8 日,第XNUMX. 确实是预言家。

近十年后的 1900 年 6,000,000 月,拉比戈特希尔和斯蒂芬怀斯在纽约的一次“犹太复国主义群众大会”上发表了主题演讲。他们急于强调世界各地的犹太人遭受的苦难,以帮助他们为巴勒斯坦的犹太人家园辩护。 Gottheil 笼统地谈到“俄罗斯的受压迫者”,但怀斯明确指出:“有 XNUMX 活着、流血、受苦的人支持犹太复国主义。”[7]11 月 7 日,第XNUMX. 顺便说一句, “纽约时报” 到那时,它已经正式成为一份犹太报纸; Adolph Ochs 于 1896 年收购了这家公司。从那时起,它一直保留着犹太人的所有权和管理权。 几年之内,大屠杀变得越来越激烈,最终导致小规模杀戮。 1903 年的所谓“基希涅夫(或基希涅夫)大屠杀”,其中 49 名犹太人全部被杀,第一次成为“大屠杀”。 《纽约时报》引述《纽约时报》的一篇社论 犹太纪事:

我们指控俄罗斯政府对基希内夫大屠杀负责。 我们说它沉浸在这场大屠杀的罪恶感中。 (16 月 1 日,第 XNUMX 页)

社论继续谈到俄罗斯犹太人是如何“慢慢地被消灭”并受到“灭绝过程”的影响。 这些话显然预示了大约 XNUMX 年后将对国家社会主义者提出的类似指控。

两年后,我们读到“大屠杀”仍在继续。 1905 年的一个简短项目的标题是“西蒙沃尔夫问俄罗斯大屠杀还要持续多久”。[8]10 月 2 日,第XNUMX. 也是在那一年,《纽约时报》再次报道了“我们在俄罗斯的 6,000,000 名畏缩不前的兄弟”。[9]23 月 7 日,第XNUMX. 次年,即 1906 年,我们读到了“关于俄罗斯 6,000,000 万犹太人状况和未来的惊人报告”; 这是一幅“重新开始的屠杀”和“系统性和凶残的灭绝”的“恐怖画面”。[10]25 月 6 日,第SMXNUMX。 在这一点上,人们不禁要问:犹太人是怎么回事,以至于他们受到如此持续和可怕的虐待?此外,为什么 1890 年首次报道的 XNUMX 万这个数字没有增长到更大呢?现在,不知何故,固定在六百万?如果是这样,为什么?

1910 年,我们发现“俄罗斯犹太人处于悲惨境地”,我们为“一个拥有超过 6,000,000 人灵魂的民族被系统地、无情地、无声地碾压”而感到难过。[11]11 月 18 日,第XNUMX. 在1911, “纽约时报” 报道称,“俄罗斯的 6,000,000 名犹太人被挑出来进行有系统的压迫和正当法律程序的迫害。”[12]31 月 5 日,第XNUMX. 然而事情变得更糟了:

俄罗斯正在推行明确的反犹太政策,俄罗斯犹太人的状况现在比以往任何时候都更糟,将从以下摘录中收集……[T]现在存在的限制性法律……加强[y]对犹太人的压迫,并由此使 6,000,000 万犹太人成为经济上精疲力竭的民族——一个根本没有任何权利的民族。 (10 月 8 日,第 SMXNUMX 页)

我们需要提醒自己,主要的俄罗斯人对犹太人的评价很低,并且认为自己在任何指责中都完全有道理。有时他们的话令人震惊。俄罗斯总理彼得·斯托雷平在 1911 年写道:

重要的是,种族特征将犹太人与其他人类完全区分开来,使他们成为完全不同的生物,无法进入我们的人性概念。 我们可以像观察和研究动物一样观察它们,我们可以对它们感到厌恶或敌意,就像我们对鬣狗、豺狼或蜘蛛所做的那样,但说对它们的仇恨会使它们上升到我们的水平。 ……只有在大众意识中传播这样一种观念,即犹太人的生物与其他人不同,而是模仿人类,无法与之打交道——只有这样才能逐渐治愈民族有机体并削弱犹太民族,因此它将不再能够造成伤害,或者将完全消亡。 历史知道许多灭绝的部落。 科学必须把犹太人的性格,而不是犹太人的性格置于这样的境地,以使其灭亡。[13]在 Vaksberg 中引用, 斯大林反对犹太人 (1994),p。 6。

仅仅几个月后,斯托雷平被犹太激进分子德米特里·博格罗夫暗杀。

我强调,这不仅是 “纽约时报” 那是关于六百万受苦的希伯来人的报道。犹太复国主义犹太人对他们自己的人民重复同样的话。 Max Nordau 在 1911 年的犹太复国主义大会上发表讲话时说:

有道德的政府……亲手为六百万人的毁灭奠定了基础,除了受害者本人之外,没有人提出反对——尽管这当然是比迄今为止发生的任何战争都要严重得多的罪行从未摧毁过六百万人的生命。[14]引用于 赫茨尔年鉴, 卷。 2 (1959), p. 156. 本章作者明确评论了 Nordau 的“惊人的准确性”。

因此,我们发现在多年的时间里,与犹太人有关的“六百万”、“灭绝”和“大屠杀”反复联系在一起。 历史确实在重演。

进入大战

那么,我们的大屠杀之旅似乎比我上面指出的更有趣。 这 第一 犹太人大屠杀发生在俄罗斯,至少从 1903 年到 1911 年。我们不知道在那个时期有多少犹太人被杀,但毫无疑问,它很小,因为过分强调相对较小的事件,其中,例如,49 人被杀(参见 Andrew Joyce 的“重温十九世纪的俄罗斯大屠杀”)。 根据零散的报道,总数最多在几千个数量级。 然而,6 万这个数字一再出现,作为大规模犹太人苦难的一种象征。 这为 第二 正如我即将解释的那样,第一次世界大战的大屠杀。 当然,这使得“二战”大屠杀成为 三号大屠杀. 一个相当显着的事件转折,一个不太可能在你当地的历史课上讲到。

如上所述,第一次世界大战始于 1914 年 XNUMX 月。那年 XNUMX 月,我们已经在阅读有关犹太人遭受大规模苦难的报道——我们可以猜到这个数字。 这 “纽约时报” 报道如下:

为犹太人寻求援助:美国委员会讲述了因战争而遭受的苦难。美国犹太人救济委员会召集了一次会议……考虑居住在战区的超过 6,000,000 名犹太人的困境。 (2 月 12 日,第 XNUMX 页)

所讨论的“战区”是东线,它贯穿了今天的波兰、乌克兰、奥地利和匈牙利的部分地区,以及俄罗斯西部的部分地区。 仅仅一个月后, 据悉,

当今世界约有 13,000,000 名犹太人,其中超过 6,000,000 人在战区的中心地带; 那些生命危在旦夕的犹太人,他们今天遭受着各种各样的悲伤和痛苦。 (14 月 3 日,第 XNUMX 页)

一年后,我们读到一个犹太援助协会的负责人宣称,“即使是比利时人的错误也无法与波兰犹太人遭受的暴行相提并论。 “近六百万犹太人在最大的道德和物质苦难中被毁灭。 ......世界是沉默的'。[15]28 月 8 日,第XNUMX. 如果我们忘记了, 很快就会提醒我们,确实,这种可怕的情况构成了……一场大屠杀。 10 月,一个犹太组织——犹太战争受难者资金联合分配委员会——发起了 XNUMX 万美元的呼吁,其中包括:

新的运动是美国犹太人进行的最大规模的运动。 ...... Judah Magnes 博士已经能够[确定]欧洲犹太人民的当前需求,他们已经受到世界大屠杀的影响。 (29 月 9 日,第 EXNUMX 页)

进入 1917 年,战争演变成一种僵局,臭名昭著的战壕界定了前线的大部分地区。 尽管各方面的死亡人数都在增加,但受苦的犹太人人数却非常稳定:“六百万 [原文如此] 犹太人生活在他们受到压迫、剥削、压榨和剥夺每一项不可剥夺的人权的土地上。”[16]22 月 6 日,第XNUMX. 到当年 XNUMX 月, 正在报道一项援助基金的呼吁,

以减轻欧洲战区犹太人的苦难……[他们]的苦难在历史上是无与伦比的[!]。 ... [W] 如果犹太人要在可怕的大屠杀中幸存下来,就必须拯救预兆、儿童和婴儿...(24 月 20 日,第 XNUMX 页)

我们再一次看到“大屠杀”和“六百万”受苦的犹太人之间的反复联系。

到 1918 年 XNUMX 月中旬,情况逐渐明朗——至少对 “纽约时报”——战争即将结束。 因此,他们兴奋地报道了一项惊人的“1 亿美元重建犹太人的基金”(18 月 12 日,第 XNUMX 页)。[17]以今天的美元计算,这将达到近 20 亿美元。 事实证明,在“大屠杀”中遭受痛苦、饥饿和死亡的“六百万”犹太人中——嗯,奇迹般地, 他们都活了下来. 他们需要 现金. “战争结束后,六百万人需要帮助才能恢复正常生活,”我们读到。 立即发送您的支票。

两次世界大战期间的大屠杀?

第一次世界大战刚结束,我们一直勤奋的犹太大厅就重新开始工作,让人想起更多的犹太人苦难。 1919 年 XNUMX 月——战后不到一年—— “纽约时报” 正在报道新的大规模犹太人苦难,现在在波兰和乌克兰。 在一篇标题为“乌克兰犹太人旨在制止大屠杀”的故事中,我们毫不意外地读到“6,000,000 万人处于危险之中”。 显然,其中一半在波兰,一半在乌克兰,但“所有人都需要美国的帮助”。 据报道,威尔逊总统最近发表了一份关切声明,他在声明中说:

乌克兰和波兰的 6,000,000 人已通过行动和口头通知他们将被彻底消灭,这一事实摆在全世界面前,是当今最重要的问题。 (8 月 6 日,第 XNUMX 页)

肯定是这样。

以免我们忘记,这种情况很快被描述为,是的,“大屠杀”。前纽约州州长马丁·格林(Martin Glynn)发表了一篇非犹太政治家写过的最胆小、最讨人喜欢的文章。 美国希伯来语 1919 年 XNUMX 月,题为“犹太人被钉十字架必须停止!”部分内容如下:

六百万男男女女从大洋彼岸呼救,八十万小孩在为面包哭泣。 ......与他们一起存在着人类进步的无限可能性,就像自然存在于六百万人类中一样。 ……在这场灾难中,六百万人正被残酷无情的命运卷入坟墓。 ...... XNUMX 万男女因缺乏生活必需品而死去;八十万儿童为面包哭泣。 ......在这个威胁 大屠杀 在人类生活中,哲学区别的细微之处被遗忘了。 ......因此,本着将可怜的寡妇的奉献铜变成银的精神......这个国家的人民被要求以摩西的人性的名义向六百万饥饿的男人和女人捐赠 35 万美元,以使他们的钱神圣化. 六百万男人和女人正在死去……[斜体添加]

一种真正令人震惊的奴性,如果有的话。 显然,格林对他的希伯来语支持者欠下了很多。

就在下个月,《纽约时报》报道了著名的犹太银行家菲利克斯·瓦尔堡,他最近前往欧洲亲眼目睹了苦难:

相互竞争的军队的连续打击几乎击碎了欧洲犹太人的脊梁,并使大约 6,000,000 人,或地球上一半的犹太人口减少到令人难以置信的贫困、饥饿和疾病。 (12 月 7 日,第 XNUMX 页)

故事情节在随后的几年中一直存在:

* 1920 年 6,000,000 月:“先生。路易斯·马歇尔宣称斑疹伤寒威胁了欧洲 XNUMX 名犹太人。”[18]值得注意的是,在二战期间,斑疹伤寒可能导致大多数犹太人死亡。

* 1920 年 XNUMX 月:“饥饿、寒冷的破布、荒凉、疾病、死亡——XNUMX 万人没有食物、住所和衣服……”

* 1921 年 6,000,000 月:“俄罗斯的 XNUMX 犹太人正面临屠杀”(再次!)。

* 1924 年 1,235 月:苏联的“6,000,000 次大屠杀”; “在俄罗斯超过 XNUMX 的犹太人口分散居住。 ...... [事件] 使犹太人遭受的苦难比俄罗斯人口的任何其他部分都要大。”

等等。 但事实证明了这一点。 在一系列令人难以置信、难以置信的情况下,1930 万犹太人在二战前的几十年中不断遭受各种“大屠杀”的折磨。 这种参考在 1936 年代逐渐减少,但随着第二次大战的临近再次加速。 在 1939 年至 1939 年间,多次提到“六百万”。随着 1940 年 XNUMX 月战争的爆发,这些预测变得明确。 XNUMX 年 XNUMX 月,主要的犹太复国主义者 Nahum Goldmann 被引述说:“如果纳粹的胜利是最终的,欧洲的 XNUMX 万犹太人注定要毁灭。”[19]25 月 4 日,第XNUMX. 多么惊人的预言! 戈德曼怎么会在这么早的时候知道最终的死亡人数? 犹太人的远见总是令人惊叹。

结论

这里的事实是清楚的,无可争辩的。 强烈建议读者查阅一些旧的 “纽约时报” 我提到的引文,以确认这些词确实存在。大多数在线搜索引擎或本地图书馆研究数据库都可以找到它们。他们非常该死。我们在犹太大厅的朋友没有合理的回答,没有合理的辩护,没有很好的解释;他们只能扼杀整个讨论。这正是他们所做的。

这里有明确的历史教训。如果有 XNUMX 万犹太人在第一次大屠杀(俄罗斯)中遭受苦难,但死亡人数很少,如果在第二次大屠杀(第一次世界大战)中另有 XNUMX 万人遭受苦难,但死亡人数很少,那么我们可以通过归纳逻辑合理推断,也许第三次大屠杀(第二次世界大战)中所谓的伤亡——让我们说——不太正确。鉴于我在本文开头提到的事实,尤其如此。我们也可以合理地推断出,二战中声称的“六百万”数字不是来自人数——它不是——而是一个象征性的数字,一个象征,多年来一直用来代表犹太人的大规模苦难.作为一个实际的死亡人数,它可能与现实相去甚远。

如果这一切都是真的,那么就会产生深远的后果。 首先,我们必须大幅改写我们的 50 世纪中叶历史; 其次,我们必须追究所有历史学家和政治家的责任,无论他们是犹太人还是其他人,他们强加给我们一幅扭曲的人类苦难图景; 第三,我们需要赔偿德国、瑞士、比利时以及所有被勒索向以色列和全球犹太人支付数十亿美元“赔偿”的人。 找钱并不难; 仅美国犹太人就拥有或控制着约 XNUMX 万亿美元的资产,这将大大有助于实现恢复性司法。[20]请参阅我的文章“简要了解犹太人的财富”(2019 年)。 但由于 Covid 大流行,情况变得更加极端,在此期间,犹太科技亿万富翁获得了巨大的繁荣。 只有五位最富有的美国犹太人——拉里·埃里森、拉里·佩奇、谢尔盖·布林、马克·扎克伯格和迈克尔·布隆伯格——现在拥有超过 500 万亿美元。 我们需要考虑一下:五个个人,五个犹太人,共同拥有超过 50 亿美元。 当我们再考虑 XNUMX 万左右美国犹太人的总财富时,很容易达到 XNUMX 万亿美元或更多。 我们有办法。 我们只需要鼓起行动的意志。

===================================

托马斯·道尔顿(Thomas Dalton)博士撰写或编辑了多本关于政治,历史和宗教的书籍和文章,特别着重于德国的国家社会主义。 他的作品包括新的翻译系列 我的奋斗以及书籍 永恒的陌生人 (2020) 世界大战中的犹太手 (2019), 辩论大屠杀 (4th 编,2020 年)。 最近,他编辑了罗森伯格经典作品的新版本 20 的神话th 世纪 和一本新的政治漫画书, 泛犹大!. 所有这些作品都可以在 www.clemensandblair.com.另见他的个人网站 www.thomasdaltonphd.com.

说明

[1] 他们在奥斯威辛集中营、马伊达内克和达豪向游客展示的那些所谓的毒气室是战后重建的,不可能用作使用毒气的大规模杀戮场所。 详情见我的书。

[2] 正如费伊对战争的“经典研究”所引用的那样, 世界大战的起源 (1928),p。 552。

[3] 对于这个故事,请参阅我的书 永恒的陌生人 (2020)。

[4] 在 Wheen 中引用, 卡尔·马克思 (1999),p。 340。

[5] 10 月 14 日,第XNUMX.

[6] 26 月 8 日,第XNUMX.

[7] 11 月 7 日,第XNUMX. 顺便说一句, “纽约时报” 到那时,它已经正式成为一份犹太报纸; Adolph Ochs 于 1896 年收购了这家公司。从那时起,它一直保留着犹太人的所有权和管理权。

[8] 10 月 2 日,第XNUMX.

[9] 23 月 7 日,第XNUMX.

[10] 25 月 6 日,第SMXNUMX。

[11] 11 月 18 日,第XNUMX.

[12] 31 月 5 日,第XNUMX.

[13] 在 Vaksberg 中引用, 斯大林反对犹太人 (1994),p。 6。

[14] 引用于 赫茨尔年鉴, 卷。 2 (1959), p. 156. 本章作者明确评论了 Nordau 的“惊人的准确性”。

[15] 28 月 8 日,第XNUMX.

[16] 22 月 6 日,第XNUMX.

[17] 以今天的美元计算,这将达到近 20 亿美元。

[18] 值得注意的是,在二战期间,斑疹伤寒可能导致大多数犹太人死亡。

[19] 25 月 4 日,第XNUMX.

[20] 看我的文章,“简述犹太人的财富”(2019 年)。 但由于 Covid 大流行,情况变得更加极端,在此期间,犹太科技亿万富翁获得了巨大的繁荣。 只有五位最富有的美国犹太人——拉里·埃里森、拉里·佩奇、谢尔盖·布林、马克·扎克伯格和迈克尔·布隆伯格——现在拥有超过 500 万亿美元。 我们需要考虑一下:五个个人,五个犹太人,共同拥有超过 50 亿美元。 当我们再考虑大约 XNUMX 万美国犹太人的总财富时,很容易达到 XNUMX 万亿美元或更多。

(从重新发布 西方观察家 经作者或代表的许可)
 
隐藏1213条评论发表评论
忽略评论者...跟随Endorsed Only
修剪评论?
    []
  1. Holo='牺牲'。 Caust='燃烧。 因此,一个燃烧的牺牲。 这个词最适合通过火葬场进行的基于大屠杀的第二次世界大战大屠杀。

    犹太复国主义者在描述政府资助的对目标人口的工业化谋杀时总是背诵“六百万”的数字。 这里存在一个问题。

    大约三年前,我写信给日内瓦的国际红十字会,要求根据纳粹政权规定的非法档案对分类进行细分。 以下是这些问题(来自记忆);

    1. 在政府管理但*私有(*由 SS Schulzstaffel)Konzentration Kamps 中死亡的实际人口总数是多少?

    2. 党卫军拥有和经营的集中营中总共有多少犹太人死亡?

    3. 党卫军拥有和经营的集中营中总共有多少基督徒死亡?

    4. 有多少安息日复临信徒死在党卫军拥有和经营的集中营中?

    5. 有多少因良心反对纳粹兵役的人死于党卫军拥有和经营的集中营?

    6. 有多少罗姆人死于党卫军拥有和经营的集中营?

    7 有多少同性恋者在党卫军经营的集中营中丧生?

    8. 有多少共济会成员在党卫军拥有和经营的集中营中丧生?

    9. 有多少反社会分子(即反纳粹文化、爵士乐迷、活跃的地下反纳粹分子)死于党卫军的集中营?

    10 SS Sondekommando Group 在战后“扫荡”行动期间在战场上被谋杀的总人数是多少?

    我记得在网上看到公布的个人集中营伤亡人数/受害者的数量,其中有 IRC 文件的照片。 这些对被谋杀者的群体分类进行了细分。

    犹太人数以十万计,以及其他各种分类的单独编目。 此后它已被删除,可能是因为担心发布相同内容的个人或政党被贴上“否认大屠杀者”的标签并在各个法庭受到刑事起诉,就像几本书的作者被指控为“否认大屠杀者”一样.

    毫无疑问,种族灭绝大屠杀发生了。 我个人认识几位解放集中营的美国退伍军人,我们有未上演的档案镜头,在解放集中营时,这些镜头中的实际遭遇不可能被剪辑掉。

    当我联系 IRC 时,他们说他们“没有此类信息”,我需要联系以色列的 Yad Vashem 以获取这些统计数据和历史数据。

    所以,人们可以想象另一个“六百万”的数字再次出现……六百万在几个神秘(隐藏)的含义中具有神秘的参考,具体取决于您要寻找的内容,即六西格玛、六图、六步、深六, 等等。

    还记得那个六百万美元的人吗? (我们可以重建他……我们拥有技术……!)今天,我们拥有 mRNA 疫苗,这些疫苗正在“重建”免疫系统,这些研究源自门格勒博士在集中营的活动。 我们在疫苗中拥有纳米技术和心理电子应用技术,旨在消灭我们所知的人类。

    正如现在看来,以及世界上清醒的人们现在所怀疑的那样,当前种族灭绝大屠杀中的“以科学为基础”的方法论正在通过永无止境的生物武器交付系统发生; Covid-19疫苗!

    就在今天 Infowars.com Naturalnews.com,已经宣布集中营现在正在为联合国接种疫苗的人或那些不遵守接受未经测试的致命生物武器注射到他们体内的全球议程的人做好准备。

    请参阅电影“灰色国家”的预告片......以及来自 Aleksandr Solzhenytsyn 的“古拉格群岛”的引述; “我们在*集中营里是如何燃烧的!” (由可萨犹太人经营的苏联古拉格……)

    与 Covid-19 的大规模精神病相关的宣传类似于约瑟夫·戈培尔通过纳粹大众媒体煽动同样的事情,这使持续多年的谎言得以延续。

    注意到政府从不给予自由(只有有限的自由),个人通常不得不强行从政府那里收回同样的自由。

    当这种情况开始发生时,就像目前在哈萨克斯坦一样,齐奥共济会/共产主义/光明会全球主义者就会加大赌注。 这看起来就像乌克兰的第四次世界大战,同时伴随着极权主义、暴虐的货币控制、选举欺诈、对行动自由的限制(Covid-19“护照”……),以及通过注射生物武器进行强制种族灭绝的企图.

    投票不再重要——武装起来很重要,正如我们在 Khazak 舞台上看到的那样。 路西法全球主义者再次试图将可萨犹太复国主义强加给俄罗斯,由于可萨犹太人斯大林将红色恐怖强加给俄罗斯人民,俄罗斯遭受了 70 多年的苦难,65 万人死亡! 国际银行家资助了战争、大屠杀和种族灭绝的各方,并从中赚取了巨额利润!

    普京总统,俄罗斯东正教基督徒,不会允许这种基于 Zio-Communist 的种族灭绝大屠杀再次将它的爪子挖进俄罗斯! 来自西方所谓的“自由民族国家”的许多退伍军人看到了俄罗斯正在发生的事情,并承认 BLM / ANTIFA 对西方国家的损害。

    这些退伍军人中有多少可能移民/移民到俄罗斯以捍卫基督教价值观并使俄罗斯摆脱目前正在西方消灭人类的凶残的 Zio-Globalists,但学习一门新语言并不需要只要看起来。

  2. S 说:

    让我们不要忘记 1861 年美国内战期间据称发生在南方联盟战俘营(特别是安德森维尔及其孤独的铁路车站和倒霉的指挥官亨利维尔兹)的早期洋基(即北盎格鲁-撒克逊)大屠杀- 65*。 这些指控包括“养牛车”、“注射毒药”、用“被谋杀”的联邦囚犯的人皮制造皮钱包,以及蓄意和有计划地大规模“谋杀”数千名男子。

    现在承认 北部和南部难民营的死亡率相当,不是因为谋杀,而是战争事故,即北部和南部难民营的营养和卫生条件差。

    [更多]

    在美国企业媒体对南方集中营计划大规模谋杀进行了数十年的欺诈指控之后,无论出于何种原因,这些故事在大约 1900 年停止出现在当时的报纸和期刊上。 美国政府从未向南方人民或向维尔兹家族作出正式道歉或赔偿** 就此而言,这种欺诈行为造成的巨大伤害。

    下面是一篇发表在极具影响力的美国权威期刊上的文章 大西洋月刊 1870 年 XNUMX 月,其中特别提到了安德森维尔。 标题中提到“兄弟”可能与一些盎格鲁撒克逊人(其中一些强大的人)持有的不幸信念有关,即他们属于“以色列迷失的部落”,这种信念被称为英美或英国。以色列主义”。 (见下面的第二个链接)

    在更现代的英语中,文章的标题应该是“我们的犹太兄弟”。

    “在过去的十个世纪里,他们[犹太人民]所遭受的巨大错误——安德森维尔的巨大暴行——几乎没有读者需要被提醒。”

    大西洋月刊(1870 年 XNUMX 月)——“我们的以色列弟兄”

    谁能估计基督教世界欠这些有趣而又不冒犯的人的赔偿? 我们的慈善机构在判断我们自己的迷信所创造或发展的品格过错时,应该有多丰富,多不倦!”

    “在过去的十个世纪里,他们遭受了巨大的错误——安德森维尔的巨大暴行——很少有读者需要被提醒。 1391 年,在塞维利亚对犹太人的屠杀中,有 1492 个家庭被杀害。 XNUMX 年,在斐迪南和伊莎贝拉的领导下,三十万英勇的以色列人宁愿流放也不愿背教。 他们中的许多人只能在坟墓或深海中找到安息之地; 因为无论是葡萄牙、意大利还是伊斯兰教的摩洛哥,都不会容忍一个不遵守迷信的民族的存在,他们以节俭、节制、节制和勤奋,吸收了他们生活的每个国家的财富。

    “那些留在半岛的人接受了洗礼,并被迫遵守统治教会的外在仪式。 更令人羡慕的是那些接受流放的人。 两个世纪以来,西班牙宗教裁判所最喜欢的办公室是“质疑”这 XNUMX 万犹太皈依者的诚意; 全国的娱乐活动是目睹犹太拉比和犹太少女被焚烧。 众所周知,在英国、德国和法国也发生了类似的暴行。

    * 郑重声明,我认为双方“双方”打那场该死的战争的道德理由都很糟糕。 当暴力在 1861 年变得不可避免时,与其把枪口对准对方,不如把枪口对准北方和南方的精英,以及他们各自的支持者,他们都在鼓吹战争。

    ** 基于这些欺诈指控,Henry Wirz 被错误地处决了。

    https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1870/10/our-israelitish-brethren/306257/

    http://revneal.org/Writings/Writings/british.htm

    • 回复: @mulga mumblebrain
  3. Rich 说:

    如果属实,犹太人应该很尴尬,因为他们很容易被赶上牛车并被杀。 如果我的祖先像宫廷历史学家所描绘的那样轻易屈服,我会感到尴尬。 我不确定在何时何地成为受害者成为种族令人钦佩的属性。 给我在温泉关的三百人,1527 年圣彼得广场的瑞士卫队,阿拉莫的德州人,战斗到最后的人。 这些都是英雄故事,不要羞耻地让你的祖母被推上火车并被送往东方,而你与其他囚犯争夺一块面包。 一种尴尬。

    • 回复: @Trinity
  4. anon[406]• 免责声明 说:

    “我们记得,第一次世界大战始于 1914 年 11 月,持续了四年多一点,于 1918 年 XNUMX 月 XNUMX 日结束。在这段时间的大部分时间里,英国、法国和俄罗斯三国协约国对德国、奥匈帝国和意大利的三国同盟。 ”

    意大利? 说什么?!!!

  5. Trinity 说:
    @Rich

    看起来白人正在为那些无能的犹太人争取他们的钱。 至少犹太人并没有像白人叛徒垃圾那样对自己的同类进行了超过一个世纪的攻击,而且还在继续。 白人似乎是唯一自食其果的种族。

    看起来怀特只有在与自己的同类战斗时才勇敢,至少在过去一百年左右出生的白人看来是这样。

    • 同意: follyofwar
  6. @anon

    我想他的意思是说:奥斯曼帝国,当然,它不是三国同盟的一部分。 意大利是三国同盟的一部分,但在 1914 年保持中立。然后在 1915 年,它宣布加入法国和英国。
    他应该使用同盟国,而不是三国同盟。

    • 谢谢: Rahan
    • 回复: @El Dato
    , @zimriel
  7. Rich 说:
    @Trinity

    卡波斯人是纳粹集中营中的犹太警卫,美国那些背叛自己人民的白人具有相似的性质。 共产主义中国人杀死了数百万人。 几个世纪以来,阿拉伯人一直在屠杀阿拉伯人。 几个世纪以来,非洲人一直在屠杀、奴役和出售自己的财产。 欧洲人在这方面并不是独一无二的。 在过去的 2 年里,白人在杀死东方人(二战、韩国、越南)、阿拉伯人(海湾战争 1,2。阿富汗战争、叙利亚、利比亚)方面也做得很好。 还没结束。

  8. smaragdus 说:
    @Rex.Reptilius

    基本上是一个很好的评论,除了普京/俄罗斯部分——普京是一个加密犹太人,他有一个犹太人处理程序(拉比贝雷尔拉扎尔),犹太共产主义从未离开过俄罗斯,它仍然完全由犹太银行家控制和拥有,他们会利用俄罗斯进行他们很久以前就计划好的对人类的第三次世界大战。

    • 哈哈: 36 ulster
    • 回复: @infoman
    , @Crypto Jew
  9. 很棒的文章,托马斯·道尔顿。 谢谢。

    但是,请避开“希伯来人”这个词。 没有犹太种族。 甚至语言本身,虽然被占领巴勒斯坦的欧洲人复兴了,现在在那里杀死了闪米特人……好吧,耶稣召唤了两个渔夫,说:“我会让你们成为人的渔夫,”但他用亚拉姆语对他们说。 在他那个时代,希伯来语已经是一种死语言。

    后来,耶稣用亚拉姆语说,马特。 23:55,

    有祸了,文士和法利赛人,伪君子! 因为你们把陆地和海洋都塑造成一个皈依者,当他被造出来时,你们使他成为地狱之子的两倍比你们自己多。

    自亚历山大大帝征服以来,这种情况已经持续了几个世纪。 在那个年代,旧约必须用希腊文,即七十士译本来阅读。 拉比传教欧洲,教导皈依者他们都是雅弗的孙子阿什肯纳兹的后裔 [创10:3]。 所以, 不能 闪族人。

    但地狱之子的数量要多一倍。 塔木德犹太人在公元 400 年左右消灭了希腊化犹太人(他们从当时的西班牙、大西洋沿岸一直延伸到印度的一半)。XNUMX 万。

    • 回复: @davidgmillsatty
  10. mark green 说:

    优秀的文章。 究竟是哪个“杰出的犹太人”——在二战之后——首先宣称希特勒谋杀了“六百万犹太人”(没有实际/事实的法医证据?)

    他是谁?

    那是什么时候?

    人们想知道。

    这个“学者”是从谁那里得到他的数据和证据的?

    (他收到名单了吗?)

    这个邪恶的灭绝阴谋的“文件”有没有可能只是 煮熟?–(由于涉及尚未出生的“犹太国家”的紧迫政治需求?)

    令人难以置信的是,这个由银行家、共产主义者、大亨和亿万富翁组成的受压迫部落从以前开始就一直在敲打 XNUMX 万鼓 德·富勒 甚至诞生了。

    这是一个惊人的代际案例吗 预知?–(或者只是另一种犹太洁食宣传?)

    但报纸从不撒谎。



    视频链接

    • 谢谢: Sepp
  11. Rahan 说:

    六百万是必须牺牲的数字,以使以色列得以恢复,圣殿得以重建,摩赛亚归来,每个善良的犹太人都必须拥有 2K 的非裔奴隶,他们将一无所有并快乐。

    原教旨主义者认为 6 gorillion 一定是真实发生的,而潜行者则遵循世界是上帝的感觉器官的神秘学说,如果世界相信 6 gorillion 发生了,那么上帝就会相信它,就可以了建立一个新的以色列。

    因此,今天的原教旨主义者将今天的以色列视为错误和对上帝的侮辱。 如果原教旨主义分支找到一种方法来摧毁以色列以做一个真正的六大猩猩从而实现预言,不要太惊讶。

    正如安德鲁·安格林所说,我们都被困在一部犹太心理剧中。

    • 回复: @El Dato
    , @Old and Grumpy
  12. Trinity 说:
    @Rich

    在过去的 20 年里,声称仅在美国就有几百万白人成为黑人暴力的受害者可能并没有那么夸张。 当您仅考虑每年 30 到 7 万起黑人对白人的性侵犯和/或强奸时,仅此一项就使我们达到 XNUMX 个数字。 犹太媒体报道或不报道的方式,谈论隐藏的人物。

    很多白人叛徒垃圾对此没有问题,但是当一些白人警察射杀一名黑人职业罪犯时,他们会拆毁城市或哭泣。

    • 回复: @Rich
  13. Observator 说:
    @mark green

    1944 年 XNUMX 月,臭名昭著的伊利亚·埃伦伯格 (Ilya Ehrenberg) 在苏联宣传中首次公布了“六百万”,即被德国杀害的犹太人的数量。 当时无法估计出准确的数字。

    埃伦贝格(Ehrenberg)是第二次世界大战期间苏联最高的宣传员。 作为苏联赞助的犹太反法西斯委员会的主要成员,他出现在美国的集会中,为共产主义事业提供了支持,同时展示了据称德国人从死去的犹太人的尸体制造的假肥皂。 。

    埃伦伯格在 15 年 1945 月 XNUMX 日在伦敦出版的斯大林主义宣传机构“苏联战争新闻周刊”上发表了一篇关于德国的痛苦、充满仇恨的文章,题为“他们曾经是狼——他们仍然是狼”,重复了这一主张。 他在其中说,“世界现在知道德国已经杀害了 XNUMX 万犹太人”,但没有提供确凿的证据。 这是在他宣布(在解放集中营之前!)两个月之后,四百万犹太人在奥斯威辛集中营被杀。

    1943 万(作为欧洲的总犹太人口)是由犹太裔美国作家给出的,他在 6,000,000 年 XNUMX 月的《读者文摘》上发表的《记住我们》一文中公开承认犹太复国主义者本·赫克特(Ben Hecht),他说“在这 XNUMX 人中,几乎是第三个已经被德国人、罗马尼亚人和匈牙利人屠杀了,而最保守的记分员估计,在战争结束之前,至少还有三分之一将被处死。”

    那么,战后向德国提出赔偿要求的 4.7 万犹太人是如何巧妙地隐瞒自己的存在的。

    顺便提一句,《纽伦堡法庭宪法》第21条指出:法庭不要求提供“常识事实”的证据,而应对此予以司法通知。 第19条规定:法庭不受技术证据规则的约束。

    • 谢谢: mark green, Right_On, HdC
    • 回复: @El Dato
    , @jasmin
  14. Trinity 说:
    @Ann Nonny Mouse

    犹太人永远受苦,他们这样告诉我,犹太人告诉我诺西人是邪恶的,而希特勒是魔鬼。

    • 哈哈: Ann Nonny Mouse
    • 回复: @mocissepvis
  15. Rich 说:
    @Trinity

    黑人的高犯罪率几乎没有触及中上阶层及以上阶层,所以他们不认识,也看不到。 随着保释改革和更强制的融合,越来越多的白人会看到它,也许会醒来。 在 80 年代和 90 年代初期,纽约市的犯罪率如此之高,以至于他们最终选出了一名犯罪率高的朱利安尼,并以 20 年的相对较低犯罪率收买了这座城市。 我认识的几乎所有“叛徒垃圾”的白人都来自百合白人郊区,几乎没有与黑人打交道。 它实际上给了他们一种支持动物的宗教体验。 这是妄想,我看不到它持久。 无论如何,我希望它不能持续下去。

    • 同意: CelestiaQuesta
    • 回复: @CelestiaQuesta
  16. El Dato 说:

    大量的犹太人是从哪里来的?

    他们真的从巴勒斯坦经罗马和巴库逃到东欧吗?

    他们做了吗?

    • 回复: @Old Brown Fool
  17. El Dato 说:
    @Observator

    红军种族灭绝并烧毁普鲁士和波兰的大部分地区将其纳入斯大林帝国是所有正当理由。 事实上,士兵们并没有被告知他们已经到达波兰,也许现在还不应该把所有东西都撕成碎片。

    这是现代俄罗斯基本神话的一部分,即他们在某种程度上是好人。 这是在整个 20 年代和 30 年代的大规模屠杀之后。

    他们在被占领土上埋下了什么样的“证据”?

  18. El Dato 说:
    @Rahan

    就像 Philip K. Dick 的 UBIK,但我在哪里可以买到 UBIK?

  19. Billygoat 说:

    很棒的文章。 就像我的老人在离开这个肮脏的世界之前曾经说过的那样,“我已经告诉过你六百万次了……”

  20. El Dato 说:
    @Verymuchalive

    然后在1915年,它宣布为法国和英国。

    因为他们是英国人向的里雅斯特承诺的——当时的里雅斯特是奥匈帝国的一部分。

    他们从最破旧的围栏上买下领土,并用他们自己人口的鲜血来支付,这些人口大多来自贫困的南方。

    伟大的工作。

  21. Trinity 说:

    希特勒是对的。 一个没有犹太人的腐败、犹太人的邪恶和变态、犹太人对他们所抓住的白人主人的迫害、犹太人的贪婪等的白人国家,一定会成功。

    • 回复: @Ann Nonny Mouse
    , @Bookish1
  22. > “1919 年 XNUMX 月——战后不到一年——《纽约时报》报道了犹太人再次遭受大规模苦难,现在波兰和乌克兰。”

    简而言之,这篇可怕的文章。 战争如火如荼——俄国内战。

    > “我们指控俄罗斯政府对基希内夫大屠杀负责。 我们说它沉浸在这场大屠杀的罪恶感中。 (16 月 1 日,第 XNUMX 页)”

    与此同时,维基百科:“第一次记录使用现代意义上的大屠杀一词是在 1895 年,纽约时报描述了奥斯曼军队对亚美尼亚基督徒的大屠杀。”

    > “如果我们忘记了,《泰晤士报》很快就会提醒我们,这种可怕的情况确实构成了……一场大屠杀。”

    > “新的运动是美国犹太人进行的最大规模的运动。 ...... Judah Magnes 博士已经能够[确定]欧洲犹太人民的当前需求,他们已经受到世界大屠杀的影响。 (29 月 9 日,第 EXNUMX 页)”

    …不? 基本的阅读理解表明“世界大屠杀”指的是一战的大火。

    在那之后,俄罗斯内战造成了不可否认的苦难,造成约 10 万人丧生。 显然,美国犹太人以世界末日的方式大声疾呼俄罗斯-波兰犹太人。 然而,它没有说犹太人是专门针对灭绝的。 基本的历史学问似乎太过分了。

    总体而言,6 万这个数字显然是指欧洲东方的犹太人总人口数,主要分布在被瓜分的波兰和立陶宛的土地上。 令人难以置信的是,怎么会有人对此感到惊讶。 文章的开头有效地承认了这一点! 我很困惑。 显然,美国人害怕地理就像恶魔害怕圣水一样。

    “大屠杀”这个词本身是偶然和共识选择的。 为什么不死机? Hecatomb 已被遗忘,大屠杀胜出。 没有更深的意义。
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hecatomb

    以下视频显示了一个类似的案例——随真实报纸提供。 尽管如此,我一直在畏缩,因为没有提到所有这 6 万犹太人被种族灭绝。

    • 巨魔: azureamaranthine
    • 回复: @Anonymous
    , @Sepp
  23. Anonymous[775]• 免责声明 说:
    @Adûnâi

    你不是认为大屠杀正如犹太人所说的那样发生的纳粹同情者吗? 我的意思是,真正的他妈的是什么?

    • 回复: @Adûnâi
  24. Ned kelly 说:

    你知道希特勒计划奴役并最终消灭斯拉夫人。 我知道乌克兰人的整个村庄都被强奸、焚烧和屠杀! 年轻人作为奴隶劳工被运回大里赫……这就是你需要在“国际”大屠杀纪念日记住的。

    • 哈哈: Sepp
    • 回复: @azureamaranthine
  25. @Trinity

    这样的国家将遭受犹太人袭击的猛攻。 这不是最终解决方案。

    取消他们的解放,把他们安置在隔都,让他们都戴上猪鼻子形状的黄色大徽章,不让他们离开这个国家。 没有签证。

    • 回复: @mocissepvis
  26. Ned kelly 说:

    再也不玩了……还是再玩一次? 40 名以色列人权活动家请求法院阻止以色列向乌克兰新纳粹准军事组织出售武器! 就在大屠杀的中心!

  27. Petermx 说:
    @Rex.Reptilius

    “毫无疑问,种族灭绝大屠杀发生了。 我个人认识几位解放集中营的美国退伍军人,我们有未上演的档案镜头,在解放集中营时,无法从镜头中删除实际遭遇。”

    我可以做得更好。 不,它没有发生。 我个人认识战争期间住在德国的人,但没有发生。 那些无知的士兵看到死去的、憔悴的人饿死或死于疾病,因为轰炸阻止了药品的运送,但他们的脑袋里装满了犹太人的宣传,他们相信最坏的情况。 整个德国人都饿了。 此外,60 多年来人们一直承认德国没有所谓的“死亡集中营”。 他们在 60 多年前就已经承认了这一点。 此外,奥巴马总统的叔叔和任何其他美国士兵都从未见过奥斯维辛集中营,奥斯维辛集中营是一个被恶作剧诽谤的小镇。 它在东部,布尔什维克占领了奥斯威辛。 美国人应该少说话。 他们不断地暴露他们的无知。

    奥巴马的叔叔解放了奥斯维辛?

    • 同意: John Wear
    • 回复: @Petermx
    , @Fart Blossom
  28. IronForge 说:

    Unz 先生愿意允许像道尔顿博士这样的作者/贡献者提出认真挑战有关大屠杀、犹太复国主义等的主张、计划、事件的案例,获得了这个网站 (Unz.com) 和 Unz 先生被贴上“大屠杀否认者”的标签。

    我个人建议从这里为 Financial BlogRoller 网站的新闻链接写一篇文章; 但被一封提出指控的电子邮件拒绝了。 至少站点所有者给我发了一个解释。 我相信 Unz 先生正在采取更正确的方法,允许作者请愿/解释/挑战许多主题
    公共话语。

    公共话语,这通常会导致对作者/主题/提出的立场进行限定。

    谢谢你,Unz先生

    • 同意: Katrinka
  29. Petermx 说:
    @Petermx

    英国历史学家大卫欧文谈大屠杀故事/叙述是如何创作的——1988 年

    欧文描述了 1942 年英国的心理战执行官是如何决定在广播中公布德国人建造毒气室来消灭犹太人的。 1944 年,该委员会的第 9 代波特兰公爵维克多·卡文迪什-本廷克(Victor Cavendish-Bentinck)写道:“我们在这个毒气室谎言中赚到了钱,但实际上我们必须小心一点,因为最终它会发生暴露出来,然后我们的整个心理战努力将随之瓦解”。
    大卫欧文:“我们比戈培尔博士更擅长心理战。 我们说了更大的谎言”

    纽伦堡法官弗朗西斯·比德尔(Francis Biddle)在听取了所有目击者的陈述后,在他的日记中写道:“我一个字都不相信”,其中包括一名描述她遭受的恐怖的法国妇女。

    https://worldtruthvideos.website/watch/david-irving-a-british-historian-examines-the-holocaust-1988_7TagW2iA8qDavCo.html/list/4PNTmLjEjmQcILh

  30. 我同意将精英犹太人窃取和积累的财富归还人类,但不只是这些犹太人的财富。 goy 寄生虫也需要摆脱他们不义之财的凝胶。

    • 同意: mocissepvis
  31. @S

    毫无疑问,对犹太人的大屠杀和大屠杀是大恶,对非犹太人的大屠杀和屠杀也是如此,无论是其他非犹太人,绝大多数人,还是犹太人,他们也想成为杀手。 事实上,杀害“敌人”,包括平民和儿童,甚至婴儿,不仅在犹太法律下是允许的,而且被认为是成人礼,或宗教认可的善行。
    然而,由于犹太人无情的宣传和鼓动,只有犹太人的苦难在西方变成了一种伪宗教。 正如希特勒所说,“谁记得亚美尼亚人”,或者刚果人、英国统治下的印第安人、新世界的土著人、赫雷罗人、班达人人、菲律宾人,特别是在吕宋岛,被美国人屠杀,奴隶们努力为波托西的死亡,加利西亚的匪徒屠杀的波兰人,2 万苏联公民和 XNUMX 万中国人在二战中惨遭屠杀等。没有一个“大屠杀”是“独特的”和“神圣的”,并且被用于对受害者的卑鄙侮辱,为以色列的每一项可恶罪行辩护。

    • 回复: @anarchyst
  32. “斯托雷平被犹太激进分子德米特里·博格罗夫暗杀。”

    这种说法充其量是高度误导的。 Bogrov 于 1906 年被 Okhrana 招募。在 1914 年 XNUMX 月等早期著作中,索尔仁尼琴曾明确指控 Bogrov 被 Okhrana 内的极右翼用来摆脱斯托雷平,因为他试图实施保守的土地改革。 但在他生命的最后几年,索尔仁尼琴似乎悄悄地淡化了这一点,并误导地将博格罗夫描述为“犹太激进分子”。 斯托雷平的遗孀关于博格罗夫的生命应该被饶恕的请求被忽视的部分原因可能是因为奥赫拉纳的右翼认为博格罗夫的生存不方便。 Bogrov 是 Okhrana 的一名特工,他可能被处决以阻止他谈论谁想让 Stolypin 离开。 博格罗夫在任何诚实的意义上都不是“犹太激进分子”。

  33. 这就是今天生活在以种族为基础的美国社会的感觉,当时白人被同一政府宣布为白人至上主义者和国内恐怖分子,滥用我们的税收制度为自己谋取利益。
    他们预算无休止的战争,为非法移民提供福利和低等生活的懒惰人渣,他们在烧杀掠夺和强奸而不受惩罚的情况下,吸食辛勤工作的公民的鲜血,给自己过多的福利和退休金,因为他们没有为持有该死的人做一件该死的事这个政府和它的腐败制度已经到位。
    现在是我们停止支持 GlobalHomoZioBIGsRxMIC3BLM 卡特尔的时候了,这些卡特尔试图破坏我们的创始人警告我们的基础。
    让布兰登和共和党人渣坐以待毙,不做任何该死的事来阻止美国的垮台。

    • 回复: @mocissepvis
  34. @Anonymous

    > “你不是认为大屠杀正如犹太人所声称的那样发生的纳粹同情者吗? 我的意思是,真正的他妈的是什么?”

    从心理上讲,否认大屠杀的新纳粹分子的存在很有趣。 为什么要否认他的敌人的死亡? 回答——因为这些假纳粹分子是基督徒,基督教道德认为力量是邪恶的,受难者是有福的。 很不幸。 至少从 19 世纪以来,基督教就没有帮助过北美的雅利安人。 当它的狂热分子为了向黑人提供他们的女儿而流淌着美洲原住民的鲜血时。

    • 回复: @Bookish1
  35. @El Dato

    XNUMX世纪左右在今天的乌克兰地区有一个王国,他们大量皈依犹太教,从而形成了数字。 传说王国紧邻基督教拜占庭帝国和穆斯林波斯帝国。 为了确保双方都不会被激怒,他们选择皈依犹太教。

    • 回复: @Druid
  36. Franz 说:

    首先,我们必须大幅改写我们的 XNUMX 世纪中叶历史; 第二

    在 FIRST 之前,我们必须能够与志同道合的欧洲人会面、交流和商议,无论他们身在何处。

    这真的意味着我们必须征服世界。 他们有我们 **那** 聚在一起……你知道还有什么吗? 可能是房间里的某个白人,可能是 Antifa,向部落暗示我们在问无礼的问题。 我们看到关闭该国每个私人场所的任何白人民族主义会议是多么容易。

    “你的敌人应该是你自己的家人。” - 马修

    • 同意: CelestiaQuesta
    • 回复: @CelestiaQuesta
  37. Anonymous[397]• 免责声明 说:

    6万发子弹不是比火车票价和汽油费便宜吗? 还有食物? 和劳动力?

    • 同意: John Wear, Robert Dolan
  38. @Rex.Reptilius

    爬虫先生写道:

    毫无疑问,种族灭绝大屠杀发生了。 我个人认识几位解放集中营的美国退伍军人

    事实上,事实恰恰相反。 没有证据表明德国人进行了任何系统的种族灭绝行动。

    是的,英国、美国和苏联士兵解放了集中营,发现无数人死亡,还有数千人濒临死亡边缘。

    现在,你为什么这么认为?

    这可能与盟军已经取得完全的空中优势并且所有移动的东西都被遗忘的事实有关吗?
    看看这个 46 秒的视频:

    您可能想知道为什么盟军战士会用他们的马匹和马车扫射农民。
    在扫射并摧毁了每一个可以想象的车辆车队和机车之后,他们的目标几乎没有了。 所以战斗机飞行员实际上被指示攻击马车,他们被告知这会破坏前线战斗部队的食物供应,从而有助于缩短战争。

    好吧,你猜怎么着? 由此造成的附带损害导致没有食物进入营地或德国城市。

    是的,在战争的最后几个月,整个德国的运输和后勤系统都被炸成了碎片,以至于任何机动运输都毫发无损,剩下的一点点被用来供应前线部队。
    在战争的最后几个月里,德国平民自己也在挨饿。

    爬虫先生,回到在这些集中营中发现的成千上万的死者和濒死者,你怎么知道其中一小部分是犹太人?
    事实是,你没有。

    绝大多数可能是俄罗斯或波兰的外邦人。 仅在与布尔什维克部落冲突的头几个月,德国就俘虏了超过 3 万苏联俘虏,这甚至还没有考虑到后来在战争的剩余几年中俘虏的无数人。
    除此之外,大量波兰(绝大多数是天主教*)平民被征召到这些营地工作。
    (*在 90 年代初苏联解体后,德国人保存的详细分类账面世,其中显示在奥斯威辛-比克瑙死亡的天主教徒比犹太人多得多)。

    您可能会问,在很大程度上可以肯定地说,这些所谓的灭绝营中没有发生种族灭绝事件?

    以下是 Unz Review 中以 HTML 格式提供的一本书的摘录(我强烈建议您阅读并了解事实):

    直到战争结束,红十字国际委员会(红十字国际委员会)访问并视察了所有主要集中营。
    为响应美国国务院的要求,红十字国际委员会在 22 年 1944 月 XNUMX 日给国务院的正式信函中回复说,红十字国际委员会没有发现大规模谋杀集中营囚犯的证据。
    …… (摘自“德国战争”,第 8 章:所谓的欧洲犹太人种族灭绝 – 约翰·威尔)。

    众所周知,John Wear 偶尔会出现在 UR 的评论部分。
    如果有机会,您最好与这位智者接触,并大大扩展您对二战真实情况的知识基础——而不是依赖于通常的 Zio 罪魁祸首灌输给您的卡通宣传。

  39. Sepp 说:

    1881 年,一个名为 Narodnaya Volya 的无政府主义者团伙,其中包括一些犹太人,成功暗杀了亚历山大。

    仅仅几个月后,斯托雷平被犹太激进分子德米特里·博格罗夫暗杀。

    暗杀和恐怖主义似乎与犹太教有相同的起源。 在同一时期,当犹太人对一长串“6 万犹太人大屠杀死亡”的记录像破纪录一样吹捧时,他们也发动了源源不断的政治暗杀和暗杀企图。 名单是巨大的:弗朗茨约瑟夫,威廉皇帝一世,沙皇亚历山大二世(俄罗斯),亚历山大一世(塞尔维亚),俾斯麦,麦金莱,加菲尔德,林肯,甚至肯尼迪。 最近,我们为犹太暗杀进行了整场战争:萨达姆·侯赛因、卡扎菲和索莱梅尼。 可以很容易地认为,里滕豪斯几乎是被犹太人暗杀的,因为试图谋杀他的反法共产主义者都是犹太人。

    有些人可能会争辩说,我们既不能证明是“犹太人”扣动了扳机,也不能证明他所属的由大多数犹太人经营的组织真的是“犹太人”。 当然,这些人拒绝承认希伯来隐藏的手,即使是在一个 C-Jew 运行该行动的情况下。 斯大林和列宁是两个最好的例子。

    我还可以了解犹太人对其他民族造成的所有“大屠杀”,例如大饥荒、亚美尼亚大屠杀、卡廷森林、莱茵草原营地、巴勒斯坦、加沙、黎巴嫩、纽伦堡,甚至我们目前的瘟疫。

    正如最近关于温斯坦、爱泼斯坦和麦克斯韦的揭露所表明的那样,犹太人像一团毛刺一样粘在一起,总是互相掩护。 纵观历史,犹太人一直痴迷于“对犹太人有益”的事情。 纵观历史,犹太人一直是世界上最大的骗子。 纵观历史,犹太人的行为就像一个巨大的“Cosa Judaica”暴徒。 当有一天他们所有的假大屠杀都回家栖息时,犹太人不应该感到惊讶。

    • 回复: @SolontoCroesus
    , @GenFranco
  40. Ed Case 说:
    @Rex.Reptilius

    你退役了 Mulga Mumblebrain 手柄吗,cobber?

    • 回复: @mulga mumblebrain
  41. Sepp 说:
    @Truth Vigilante

    爬虫先生像犹太人一样撒谎。

    顺便说一句:您的视频有年龄限制。

    • 谢谢: Truth Vigilante
    • 回复: @anon
  42. Sepp 说:
    @Adûnâi

    “没有一个提到所有这 6 万犹太人被种族灭绝。”

    笑。

    那些神奇的犹太人肯定很棒。 6 万人在大屠杀中丧生…… 在他们的想象中。

    • 谢谢: Arthur MacBride
    • 哈哈: Pat Kittle
  43. 当然,神圣的骗局是犹太人的另一个大谎言,“政治科学”和“经济学”以及我们被告知要相信的其他“社会科学”的大多数基本假设也是如此。

    大多数德国和波兰犹太人移民到巴勒斯坦、法国、英国和美国。 他们带着他们的“银行”(庞氏骗局)。

    但要小心拥抱希特勒和纳粹主义。 这正是犹太人想要你做的。

    二战的可怕真相

    经过八十年连续的神圣骗局宣传,美国人和欧洲人很难理解为什么德国在二战中的失败可能是历史上最大的悲剧。

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GBS5APAiTz4&list=PLDVQ932i7NF0VoIBQ7Rp-_bRl6_mPfC5_&index=401

    丹尼斯怀斯的电影并未完全揭示这一说法的真相 从未讲过的最伟大的故事. 但是当意识到阿道夫希特勒只是罗斯柴尔德王朝和其他犹太人的另一个有用的白痴时,悲剧的惊人深度打破了人们对人类经历的看法。

    毫不奇怪,犹太人会做任何事情来阻止其他人了解真相。 这是大多数犹太人及其机构的全职“工作”——包括他们的企业垄断和傀儡政权。

    正如我之前提到的,希特勒和纳粹是英格兰银行、大英帝国和其他犹太-可萨恐怖分子盟友的有用白痴。 证明在这里:

    十三大战略“失误”

    [更多]

    1 - 希特勒钦佩并效仿大英帝国。

    2 – 希特勒阻挠德国发展核技术。

    3 – 希特勒向美国宣战,而不是招募美国成为德国、西班牙、意大利、罗马尼亚、希腊、芬兰、瑞典、挪威、瑞士和其他反共国家的盟友。

    4 - 希特勒未能在对苏联的战争中招募日本。

    5 - 希特勒阻挠德国在敦刻尔克俘获英国军队。

    6 - 希特勒阻挠德国生产喷气式战斗机,这对于有效防御英国对欧洲的轰炸至关重要。

    7 – 希特勒在不列颠之战期间阻挠德国瞄准英国的军事目标。

    8 - 希特勒阻挠德国从英国手中解放爱尔兰、苏格兰、威尔士和英格兰。

    9 - 希特勒阻挠轴心国向北非隆美尔将军的装甲供应燃料。

    10 - 希特勒将德国的东部师转移到列宁格勒和斯大林格勒,从而阻止德国占领莫斯科并从共产党手中解放东欧。

    11 – 希特勒阻挠继续将犹太人驱逐到巴勒斯坦(1941 年后)。

    12 - 希特勒将德国中央银行国有化,但他忽略了禁止部分准备金银行业务。

    13 - 希特勒阻碍了领导德国抵御共产主义和法英帝国的有能力的替代方案。

    由于希特勒的无能,超过六千万(60,000,000)外邦人被可萨统治的傀儡政权残酷屠杀。

    至少,对于德国的战略对手(荷兰皇家壳牌、法兰西帝国、罗斯柴尔德王朝和英格兰银行)来说,阿道夫·希特勒和德国国家社会主义者(纳粹)是有用的白痴。

    但是,阿道夫·希特勒和其他国家社会主义者完全有可能是英国、苏联和世界犹太复国主义组织 (WZO) 击败德国的心甘情愿的傀儡和代理人,不是吗?

    从未讲过的最伟大的故事 (2013) – 丹尼斯·怀斯

    https://TheGreatestStoryNeverTold.tv

    在第三帝国内部 (1970) – 阿尔伯特·斯佩尔

    https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B0006D5SBC

    学习适当的历史教训永远不会太晚,不是吗?

    • 同意: Thim
    • 回复: @Old and Grumpy
    , @saggy
  44. @Trinity

    你写了:

    犹太人受了那么多苦。

    同意。 你提到的“这么多”通过下面拇指和食指之间的 2 厘米间隙表现出来:

    • 回复: @Luus Kanin
  45. @anon

    你写了:

    在这段时间的大部分时间里,英国、法国和俄罗斯的三国协约国与德国、奥匈帝国和意大利的三国同盟对峙。 ”

    意大利? 说什么?!!!

    希特勒本人在转述拿破仑一个多世纪前所说的话,他在 1943 年意大利转而效忠盟国时说:

    “意大利人从来没有在他们开始的同一边结束战争——除了他们两次换边的情况”。

  46. Anonymous[661]• 免责声明 说:

    作为大屠杀宣传幸存者,我要感谢 Dalton 撰写本文。 我已经知道这篇文章的大部分内容,但我们仍然必须永远不要忘记世界是如何被各种犹太游说团体欺骗的。

    • 同意: John Wear
    • 回复: @Old and Grumpy
  47. St-Germain 说:
    @anon

    “……德、奥、意三国同盟。”

    哦,好吧,意大利离土耳其不是很远,但作者仍然应该解雇他的校对员。 否则,这是一篇关于象征性地受苦的六百万的很好的文章。

  48. @Trinity

    你说:“至少犹太人没有像白人叛徒垃圾那样背叛自己的同类……”

    听说过现在叫乔治·索罗斯的那个人的年轻事迹吗?

  49. infoman 说: • 您的网站
    @smaragdus

    您好,关于您的评论,根据国家元首史蒂夫·皮切尼克(Steve Pieczenik)的说法,他在播客中声称,在亚历克斯·琼斯秀(Infowars)的播客中,他们,意思是犹太人控制的美国军事情报局,让普京就位,以控制俄罗斯。 他声称的事件发生在所谓的最后一位真正的俄罗斯民族主义将军在一次“意外”中丧生之后,当时他所谓的直升机坠毁。

    RIP。 亚历山大·列贝德。

    一些来源:
    特克斯火星
    迈克尔·柯林斯·派珀
    史蒂夫·皮泽尼克
    亚历克斯·琼斯 Infowars 节目。
    Wellaware1
    布伦登·奥康奈尔
    米歇尔·雷诺夫夫人
    鲁道夫·杰玛
    恩斯特·赞德尔(Ernst Zundel)
    罗伯特·福瑞森博士
    本杰明·H·弗里德曼
    乔丹麦克斯韦

    希望这可以补充您的工作和知识库。

  50. @Rahan

    有趣的。 所有优秀的以色列人都将在第四剂疫苗中再次接种 Covid 疫苗。 也很难不注意到所有这些疫苗制造商的首席执行官是未来的所有者 2 外邦奴隶。

  51. @Anonymous

    你很勇敢地成为大屠杀宣传幸存者。 你为我们其他人带路。

  52. Katrinka 说:
    @Trinity

    我猜你的评论需要一个 sarc/ 标签。 呵呵呵呵

    • 同意: Trinity
  53. @Jon Chance

    简单的版本是一个来自奥地利的无名下士在没有高层人士的祝福和帮助的情况下不会上升到顶层。 别在乎他的口才多好。 德国政界厌恶他。 德国犹太银行家没有。 欧洲人永远不会从两次战争造成的这么多阿尔法人物的死亡中恢复过来。 故事结局。 非常感谢阿道夫!

  54. @Petermx

    “毫无疑问,种族灭绝大屠杀发生了。 我个人认识几位解放集中营的美国退伍军人,我们有未上演的档案镜头,在解放集中营时,无法从镜头中删除实际遭遇。”

    我可以做得更好。 不,它没有发生。

    你是对的。 说到“镜头”,至少有一些,可能是大部分,都是垃圾。 直截了当的宣传,并且为了记录,任何对“Goebells”喋喋不休的人都可能在模仿旧的战争谎言(宣传)。

    阿尔弗雷德希区柯克和宣传项目 3080.:

    [前战俘]同意,牛车里装满了被俘的感染斑疹伤寒和痢疾的德国士兵。 他们实际上是好莱坞恐怖电影专家阿尔弗雷德希区柯克制作的电影中不知情的临时演员。 他获得了为纽伦堡法庭制作一部关于集中营的电影的合同。 晚上,那些还活着的人将在布痕瓦尔德、达豪和其他集中营卸下死去的囚犯。 然后希区柯克会拍摄他们,将尸体堆描绘成德国暴行的受害者。 大量尸体在夜间被倾倒在布痕瓦尔德,第二天,魏玛市民被迫走过腐烂的尸体堆,闻到令人作呕的恶臭。 他们中的一些人实际上相信美国的宣传,尸体是集中营的囚犯。 这一切都是作为希区柯克电影的一部分拍摄的。 随后,尸体被推入附近的万人坑。 这也是剧本的一部分。 这就是我在 16 年 1945 月 XNUMX 日目睹的那批垂死的德国俘虏的火车上,两位前美国陆军军官给我的解释。

    - 奥斯威辛、布痕瓦尔德和阿尔弗雷德希区柯克的第一部恐怖电影
    来自一名德国士兵的回忆录

    尼莫匿名

    http://www.inconvenienthistory.com/4/4/3195

  55. Ned kelly 说:
    @Sepp

    我不与 Nutzis 争论......也许他们可以用你的名字命名一些冲锋队:Sepptic Shock Truppen 或希特勒的新奇迹坦克:Das Sepptic Tank...... LoL

    • 回复: @Sepp
    , @HdC
  56. Katrinka 说:
    @mark green

    而且,如果有人仍有疑问……那就是这个。

    https://christiansfortruth.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/6-million.pdf

    关于奥地利下士上台前的“六百万”几十年的数十篇文章。

    毒气室和六百万是恐惧色情片。

    • 同意: HdC
  57. HT 说:

    犹太人很聪明,懂得推销和操纵,控制信息流。 简而言之,这就是美国分崩离析的原因。

    • 同意: Katrinka
  58. anarchyst 说:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    没有犹太人的“大屠杀™”,我可以证明这一点……
    那么,如果“大屠杀™”被彻底记录下来,为什么所有的文件都表明它从未发生过??
    自战争结束以来,所有德国营地的文件都存储在Bad Aralson。 红十字会/ ITS是负责在Bad Aralson控制这些记录的机构。
    战争结束1985年后的40年,查尔斯·贝德曼博士(Charles Beiderman)担任红十字会/ ITS的负责人,他被要求在Zundel审判中作证。 贝德曼作证说,截至31年1983月373,468日,在特别登记处和其他各个登记处登记的死亡总数为XNUMX。

    [更多]

    没有一个文件概述任何针对犹太人或其他人的灭绝计划。 实际上,著名的犹太复国主义者与德国政府合作,并在德国政府的最高层制定了将犹太人转移到当时称为巴勒斯坦的计划。 绝没有关于灭绝的记载或记录。
    如果一个国家一心要进行种族灭绝,为什么要保留记录?? 为什么它会在数百(如果不是数千)英里之外建造营地,并配备卫生设施、住房、医疗、娱乐和其他辅助设施? 不经历所有这些麻烦就“消除”它们不是更容易吗?

    如果目标是灭绝,他们为什么要利用极其有限的能源在后勤运动上花费大量精力? 事情没有加起来。
    在整个犹太大屠杀™ 交易中,有些东西很臭。 犹太复国主义者与德国政府达成交易以使犹太德国人的生活不舒服,这已不是什么秘密。 事实上,是犹太复国主义领导人首先提议所有犹太人都佩戴黄色的大卫之星臂章,这样他们就可以很容易地被识别出来。 德国犹太人首先认为自己是德国人,并没有移民的愿望。
    甚至铸造的硬币显示了德国和犹太复国主义利益之间的合作。
    自6,000,000年代以来,与1800万人口一起建立家园是犹太复国主义者的梦想。 从1800年代开始,一天中的许多期刊都吹捧着“六百万”的数字。
    有什么比让德国社会的精英(犹太人)为难为难更能鼓励移民到外国的方式呢?? 关于所谓的犹太大屠杀™的真相已经出炉。 . .
    由于火葬一个人体需要数小时,因此 holocaust™ 发起人声称的时间在物理、科学和统计上都是不可能的。 他们的说法也没有考虑到火葬场维修等所需的“停机时间”。此外,也没有与“六百万”甚至“百万”的说法相称的大规模墓地。

    犹太人还禁止挖掘声称可能的墓地。

    为什么??
    因为它们不存在。

    甚至还禁止使用探地雷达搜索墓地。 为什么??
    如果数以百万计的人被毒死和火化,这些活动将持续到1950年代。
    所谓的犹太大屠杀 ™ 已经变成了事实上的宗教,不允许偏离正统。 事实上,在大多数欧洲国家,严禁对犹太人大屠杀真相进行独立调查,否则将面临罚款和监禁。 在美国,情况并没有那么糟糕,只有那些害怕犹太人大屠杀的真实真相的部落的人失去了工作以及个人和职业毁灭
    被曝光是显而易见的。
    holocaust™ 审判中使用的一个有问题的不诚实司法“技巧”是“司法通知”,其中不能将真相用作辩护或在袋鼠法庭起诉那些敢于调查这一历史事件的人的证据。 司法通知一旦针对被告提起,就不允许引入不符合关于“holocaust™”的“普遍接受的信念”(NOT TRUTH)的证据,即使该证据暴露了 HOLOCAUST™ 的主张、谎言和捏造可能很容易被揭穿。 大屠杀推动者的一个问题-为什么有法律将寻求真相定为犯罪? 你害怕什么??™
    当有关这一小型历史事件的真相浮出水面时,它将改变世界对那些将这一事件用作不断捐赠的摇钱树的人的看法。 . . “没有像 SHOAH 业务这样的业务”。 犹太复国主义者在这一事件中的同谋被小心地掩盖了。
    当今审查制度的一个很好的例子是等待那些敢于质疑官方犹太大屠杀™正统观念的人的命运。 大多数欧洲国家已将任何偏离官方犹太大屠杀™故事的思想定为犯罪。
    为什么??
    事实上,当涉及到 holocaust™ 的所有事情时,真相并不是防御。 Ask 指出 WW2 研究员大卫欧文,他被迫放弃真相以避免受到惩罚。
    holocaustianity™ 的最新受害者是 Ursula Haverbeck、Monika Schaefer 和 Sylvia Stolz,她们是年迈的祖母,因思想不正确而在德国被起诉并判处最高安全级别的监狱。 Sylvia Stolz 是一名律师,她试图引入证据来反驳所谓的“大屠杀™”主张,并因试图将 TRUTH 引入法庭记录而为她的委托人提供适当的辩护而被判入狱。
    如果人们只知道(在被选中的人中)策划犹太人大屠杀的计划,就会发生大规模的大屠杀。 你看,为了强制建立一个犹太国家,犹太人大屠杀™是必要的。 在这种情况下,ENDS 证明了 MEANS 的合理性。 在整个人类历史中,发生过许多真正的大屠杀,其痛苦程度要大得多,但犹太人的大屠杀是唯一重要的。 . . 有趣的是,在二战期间或 2 年代期间或之后,从未使用过 holocaust™ 一词来表示大规模灭绝,只是在 1950 年代才流行起来,当时人们注意到可以分配错误的内疚感并获得赔偿.
    看看所谓的犹太大屠杀™的商业化,而更大的共产主义(真正的)大屠杀被方便地遗忘了。
    为了确保犹太人大屠杀幸存者的持续供应,犹太人正在他们的子孙后代身上纹上他们的 ATM(哎呀,我的意思是营地编号)。 此外,犹太心理学家提出了一个新概念,即疾病-大屠杀™ 移情综合症。 你看,犹太大屠杀幸存者的子孙感染了这种疾病,也应该被视为大屠杀™幸存者,有资格获得大屠杀™
    赔偿。 根据这些犹太精神病学家的说法,即使是无关的人也可能被这种仅限于犹太人的“疾病”“感染”。
    自1933年犹太复国主义者犹太人向德国宣战以来(是的,1933年),德国人别无选择,只能完成将犹太人边缘化的犹太复国主义计划(至少可以这样说)。
    这实现了犹太复国主义计划,即强迫德国犹太人移民到巴勒斯坦,同时让世界授予犹太人一个家园以色列。 有趣的是,德国对犹太企业的抵制持续了一天,而犹太抵制(实际上是犹太人对德国宣战)始于 1933 年,一直持续到二战结束。
    别忘了,当1933年“世界犹太人”对德国宣战时,犹太人西奥多·考夫曼(Theodore N. Kaufman)撰写了一本书“德国必灭亡”,提倡彻底摧毁和灭绝德国,人民和文化,以及从世界时间表和历史中删除。
    犹太复国主义者在过去 6 年里一直在预测犹太人的家园,同时预测 731,000 万人的大屠杀™。 欧洲战区非战斗人员的实际死亡人数约为 6,而不是 XNUMX 万(国际红十字会官方数据)。 在战争期间,国际红十字会可以完全进入所有营地,但没有报告任何灭绝或大屠杀的实例。
    关于那个(犹太怪胎秀)holocaust™ 表演场所奥斯威辛,所谓的毒气室的设计存在工程上的不一致。 门不是气密设计; 尸体是不可能找回的,而且在所谓的毒气发生后,房间也无法通风。 有一个与任何东西都没有连接的毒气室烟囱。
    从工程的角度来看,这些都是非常严重的错误,会导致这些所谓的毒气室的操作员死亡。 由于德国人是优秀的工程师,因此很难观察到这些营地目前存在的明显工程错误。
    美国处决专家 Fred Leuchter 前往奥斯威辛集中营,偷偷从据称的毒气室中获取样本,进行测试并发表了他的结果。 除了一个样品外,所有样品中都没有普鲁士蓝(铁氰化物),这证明毒气室不存在。 一个阳性样本取自用于消毒衣服的房间。
    事实上,所谓的“毒气室”的烟囱没有连接任何东西。
    勒赫特先生因其职业和个人品格被暗杀部落而对真相的搜寻获得了奖励。 他失去了他所有的联邦和州合同,并因马萨诸塞州一项晦涩难懂的法律而被起诉,原因是该法律无执照即从事工程,而该法律在此之前或之后从未被用于斗殴。 。 在他的报告发表后,他被以色列“深州”类型(mossad)骚扰,他成功地“走出去”。
    至于“劳教所”,主要是用于“战事”的劳教所,仅此而已。 有剧院、体育设施、游泳池和其他娱乐设施供囚犯使用。 事实上,在集中营内进行日常活动的犹太“kapos”对囚犯比德国警卫残酷得多。 德国警卫因虐待集中营囚犯而面临严厉惩罚甚至处决。
    战争结束时拍摄的照片中明显的瘦弱尸体是德国基础设施和铁路线遭到破坏的结果。 为营地提供所需的物资是很困难的,如果不是几乎不可能的话。
    “Zyklon B”是一种用于衣物消毒(杀死虱子)的熏蒸剂,并且会制成非常差的“放气剂”。 事实上,由于其挥发性和弱潜力,它不可能成为有效的“放气剂”。
    众所周知,二战后,苏联人为了宣传目的而建立了死亡集中营。 是的,有极端的剥夺和痛苦,许多人丧生。 主要死因是斑疹伤寒。
    由于盟军轰炸摧毁了大部分基础设施,斑疹伤寒处于流行水平。 这就是造成大量人类死亡的原因。 . .不放气。
    有趣的是,在盟军解放营地之前,营地占领者选择与德国军队一起逃离,而不是被俄罗斯盟军解放。 为什么??
    据说日光是寻找真相的最佳消毒剂 不幸的是,这句话不适用于“大屠杀的所有事物™”。 似乎有那些害怕真相的“大屠杀™”发起人。
    因此,那些敢于质疑这一小历史事件任何方面的人都会受到起诉和监禁。
    跟随谢克尔……
    我敦促所有大屠杀™信徒检查这些事情
    你自己,如果你敢。 你不会喜欢你发现的……

    • 谢谢: Mevashir, Mike Tre, John Wear
  59. Anonymous[375]• 免责声明 说:
    @Patrick McNally

    你几乎是一个有用的白痴的教科书示例。

    • 回复: @Patrick McNally
  60. Sepp 说:
    @Arthur MacBride

    他们的纪念碑的反感超过了他们的艺术和建筑。 这正是他们的神撒旦想要的方式。

    • 同意: Arthur MacBride
    • 回复: @Arthur MacBride
  61. anon[866]• 免责声明 说:

    犹太人希望罗马尼亚人因说在学校教授数学和科学比了解大屠杀更重要而被起诉

    https://christiansfortruth.com/jews-want-romanians-prosecuted-for-claiming-science-and-math-more-important-than-holocaust-to-learn-about-in-school/

    • 谢谢: Kolya Krassotkin
    • 回复: @HdC
  62. saggy 说: • 您的网站
    @Jon Chance

    正如我之前提到的,希特勒和纳粹是英格兰银行、大英帝国和其他犹太-可萨恐怖分子盟友的有用白痴。 证明在这里:

    十三大战略“失误”

    我和其他许多人一样,我敢肯定,通常不会对这种白痴做出回应,但我检查了你的网站,发现你实际上是在公开做一些事情来揭露全息。 鉴于 …。 为什么不停在那里...... 不要接受这个星球上的每一个愚蠢的“阴谋论”,你所做的只是声称唯一严重反对犹太人的纳粹分子是犹太人的骗子,正在说服人们你是个傻瓜。 你已经是一个边缘化群体的一部分,那些明白大屠杀是一场骗局的人,为什么还要进一步边缘化自己,以至于全国只有 10 个人认为你不是一个彻头彻尾的白痴。

    我还想评论这篇文章——为什么道尔顿没有提到海德斯海默的书——你可以在这里阅读…… http://www.holohoax101.org

    • 回复: @Bookish1
    , @Jon Chance
  63. Sepp 说:
    @Ned kelly

    显然,来自特拉维夫的 Ned Kelly 需要更多证据。

    享受第 5 次戳 Ned,你的近交大脑中的更多血块肯定不会比它已经损坏的那个 matza 球更多。

    • 回复: @Ned kelly
    , @Ukraine Tiger
  64. @Sepp

    暗杀和恐怖主义似乎与犹太教有相同的起源。

    — 主要的犹太节日庆祝犹太人大量杀害他人并窃取他们的土地、房屋、动物、货物、财富、儿童、发明(其他人的智力成果)
    逾越节
    普林

    ——犹太人偷走了他们宣称“上帝赐给他们”的土地

    (请注意这个视频中的年轻人显然认为这是完全正常的,约书亚打破了另一个人的城镇的墙壁是一件好事。)

    ——根据这些以色列作者的说法,犹太人至少从公元前 325 年就一直是恐怖分子,直到今天:

    点击图片阅读前几页 以色列的犹太恐怖主义; 这是开头段落中的一些内容:

    “在对叛乱和恐怖主义的当代讨论中,很少有人提到这样一个事实: 恐怖主义的最早表现之一可以追溯到公元前二世纪。 它发生在古代以色列的希腊化统治期间,该统治始于公元前 332 年,亚历山大大帝占领该国,并在他的希腊化继任者托勒密和塞琉古王朝的统治下持续到公元前 160 年。 经常提到这一历史时期的,是当代犹太恐怖分子,他们钦佩古代犹太武装分子的英雄主义,并渴望效仿他们。”

    “为了历史正义,重要的是要注意,哈斯蒙尼姆在以色列进行了一场针对希腊化统治的持续游击战,而恐怖主义只是他们战略武器库的一小部分。 由 Hashmoneaim 实施的最重要的恐怖主义事件是谋杀希腊特使 Apelles。 . . .
    尽管 Hashmonai 起义与当代犹太恐怖主义之间存在巨大的历史鸿沟,但很难不被 造成暴力的因素及其发展方式的相似性。 。 。 。”

    然后,作者解释说,与今天一样,在公元前 2 世纪激怒犹太恐怖分子的是对他们居住的土地上的犹太人主权的挑战。

    ____
    @ #7,三位一体写道:

    “至少犹太人没有像白人叛徒垃圾那样对自己的同类进行攻击,这已经超过一个世纪而且还在继续。”

    错误。
    首先,三位一体需要破解藏在钢琴凳上的旧圣经:摩西命令利未人在西奈山脚下杀死他们的犹太人同胞。

    然后,如果 Trinity 偷看 以色列的犹太恐怖主义, 将会发现对犹太人对犹太人的恐怖主义行为的广泛讨论。

    这里提到了西卡里亚人久经考验的战术:

    在另一个例子中,我不记得发生这种自相残杀冲突的具体原因或当事方,因为该地区的战斗肆虐,一群犹太人在耶路撒冷城门内寻求避难。 反对派犹太人进入城门,在战斗结束前杀死了 8000 名犹太人。

    那么,从大屠杀的叙述中,我们必须得出的结论是, 豹子可以改变它的斑点。
    尽管犹太人杀害犹太人被奉为犹太教 神圣的经文; 虽然犹太人至少从公元前 300 年开始就是凶残的恐怖分子,但今天的犹太人钦佩和实践同样的恐怖主义意识形态和策略; 但是在 20 世纪的欧洲战争期间,犹太人变成了 dindu nuffin 温顺的羔羊和完全无辜的受害者。

    • 谢谢: Z-man
    • 回复: @Sepp
  65. Don Unf 说:
    @Trinity

    这不是白人特有的失败,它只是展示了宣传的力量。 任何以相同方式塑造的种族都会表现相似。

  66. Bookish1 说:
    @Trinity

    你说希特勒是对的是对的,但请说出一位敢于这么说的政治家。

    • 回复: @Trinity
  67. Bookish1 说:
    @Adûnâi

    美洲原住民的血河没有溢出。 在所有英印战争中丧生的印度人总数不到 20,000 人。 大多数战斗都是小规模的小冲突,并被报道为大战斗。 现在这个大陆上的印第安人比战争前更多,印第安人杀死的印第安人比白人杀死的印第安人还多。

    • 回复: @anon
    , @Sick of Orcs
    , @JR Foley
  68. Mevashir 说:
    @Rex.Reptilius

    我钦佩你的热情,但请解释为什么你的英雄普京要求与犹太复国主义西方一样的 Covid 限制和 vaxx 要求?

    关于道尔顿文章的最后一段:

    如果这一切都是真的,那么就会产生深远的后果。 首先,我们必须大幅改写我们的 XNUMX 世纪中叶历史; 其次,我们必须追究所有历史学家和政治家的责任,无论他们是犹太人还是其他人,他们强加给我们一幅扭曲的人类苦难图景; 第三,我们需要补偿德国、瑞士、比利时以及所有被勒索向以色列和全球犹太人支付数十亿美元“赔偿”的人。 找钱并不难; 仅美国犹太人就拥有或控制着大约 50 万亿美元的资产,这将大大有助于实现恢复性司法。 [20] 我们有办法。 我们只需要鼓起行动的意志。

    犹太人会争辩说,即使他们的二战死亡人数只有 600,000(当前数字的 1/10),他们仍然应该为他们在大规模围捕和监禁欧洲平民犹太人集中营中没收的所有财产进行赔偿。

  69. @Sepp

    那个巨大而怪诞的犹太憎恶位于柏林米特区(中央),位于蒂尔加滕公园旁曾经美丽而著名的菩提树下大道。

    “建筑师”来自纽约市。

    欧洲被害犹太人纪念碑于 2005 年在柏林开幕。它由 2,711 块不同高度的灰色混凝土板构成,分布在 19,000 平方米的场地上。 彼得·艾森曼于 2020 年 XNUMX 月在他位于纽约市的工作室接受了马克-克里斯托夫·瓦格纳的采访。

    https://www.archdaily.com/938511/peter-eisenman-designing-berlins-holocaust-memorial

    各家旅游公司争先恐后地热情说服他们的客户参观这个“建筑瑰宝”。

  70. Bookish1 说:
    @saggy

    希特勒将德国银行体系与国际银行家脱钩,并将德国银行国有化,这就是二战的开始。 希特勒让德国成为一个非常成功的国家这一事实让国际银行家感到困扰,因为如果德国能做到,其他国家也会效仿。

    • 同意: HdC, Robert Dolan, Towey
    • 谢谢: Trinity
  71. 我(不是白痴):“如果伦敦遭到核武器袭击,9 万人会这样做。”

    托马斯·道尔顿(一个彻头彻尾的白痴,在伦敦被核爆炸之后):“天啊,那个人说会死多少人,这一定是谎言,我的这个指控是无可争辩的。”

    ...

    想象一下成为托马斯·道尔顿。 我哭了。

  72. Blip Blop 说:

    我们不被允许质疑这种“大屠杀”的叙述,因此它是一个骗局。 量子点

  73. 有趣的是,在 ((MSM)) 或审判 ((judge)) 中没有提及 ((Epstein and Maxwell's)) 儿童卖淫团伙的顾客是谁,但审判 ((judge)) 上安德鲁王子案想要全力以赴,开放和运行,即使他似乎被某种购买和支付的 NDA 所覆盖。

    我的钱是基于可萨暴徒真的想要结束英国的君主制的想法,尽管那是他们曾经拥有过的最好的事情、保护者和促进者。 “您的时间到了,女士,您的时间到了。 到处都是你该死的雕像! 再见,很高兴认识你。”

    “哦,你打针了吗?”

    • 回复: @CelestiaQuesta
  74. 其他人是否看过其中一个营地的托儿所的照片? 如果最后的结局是谋杀母亲和孩子,为什么 EEBIL GERMANS 会让女性将婴儿抱到足月?

    伟大的 Elie Wiesel(从未见过的营地纹身)第 5 章 夜晚 描述了营地医生如何在杀死无法工作的囚犯的同时治愈他严重感染的脚。

    很多东西没有加起来。

    • 回复: @Sepp
  75. KenH 说:

    实际上,有 XNUMX 万犹太人丧生了很多次,包括:

    1) When Donald Trump was elected in 2016
    2) 2017 年夏洛茨维尔之后
    3) 6 月 XNUMX 日的武装白人至上主义勃起
    4)每次有人在主要技术平台上批评犹太人

    如果共和党在 2022 年重新夺回国会,另外 XNUMX 万犹太人可能会灭亡。 再次。

    • 谢谢: Robert Dolan
    • 哈哈: CelestiaQuesta
    • 回复: @anonymous
  76. 这是一篇非常简短和肤浅的文章,但很好的介绍。 事实上,1881 年对沙皇的暗杀完全是犹太人所为,而沙皇并没有为犹太人所用,他们实际上在过去的 50 年里一直在试图帮助他们同化,但暗杀是他们得到回报的方式. 暗杀沙皇尼古拉二世的主要是犹太人。 当沙皇开始教育犹太人时,犹太人才发现他们的宗教有多糟糕,并在俄罗斯很大程度上转向世俗的天堂计划,因此是布尔什维克主义。

  77. Oracle 说:

    一个先验的逻辑证明:如果相关人员被消灭,那么他们就不会占据今天的大部分权力和影响力位置。 相关人士在今天占据了大部分权力和影响力的位置,因此他们在过去的任何时候都没有被消灭。

  78. HdC 说:
    @Ned kelly

    “与其张开嘴消除所有怀疑,不如保持沉默并被认为是傻瓜。”

    • 回复: @Ned kelly
  79. HdC 说:
    @anon

    数学是种族主义和反犹主义,你不知道吗?

  80. @Franz

    有消息称 DOJ 正在“建立”一个“国内恐怖主义特遣部队”,我们不应该对在 UNZ 这个伟大的平台上,FBI 特工又名 DTTF(国内恐怖主义特遣部队)及其在线行动感到惊讶((( IDF/Mossad/CIA))) 已将虚假信息破坏者渗透到评论部分,其唯一目的是挑起对 GlobalHomoZioBIGsRxMIC3BLM 污秽的极端主义攻击。
    如果他们能够安插煽动暴力的卧底资产,导致数百名无辜的爱国者在国会大厦被捕,行使他们的申诉权,想象一下他们对我们其他人的计划。
    我的问题是,数百万潜在的敌对白人国内恐怖分子需要多少逮捕、失去生计和虚假监禁才能反击?
    如果他们想要 CW 2.0,我说让我们给他们,希望最好的团队获胜。
    让我们去布兰登和所有共和党的污秽。

    • 回复: @Franz
  81. Ned kelly 说:
    @Sepp

    阴谋疯子无法理解的是,犹太人总是会打败他们在你最疯狂的妄想中能想到的任何东西……
    所以我要给你Sepp——测试。 这将肯定地证明你不是犹太人……你准备好了吗? 现在塞普,闭上你的眼睛……你不再是纳粹,你现在是犹太人! 你必须像犹太人一样思考……你必须是犹太人……今天是 IHR 日……。 现在作为犹太人,想一想:作为犹太人,我能做的最糟糕的事情是什么? 想想塞普,想想……我在等你的回答。

    • 巨魔: Sepp
    • 回复: @Poco
    , @Sepp
    , @Badger Down
  82. @Rich

    在 19 世纪之交,白人与其他白人的争斗是可以理解的,因为他们占世界人口的三分之一。 但是现在看看它们; 他们几乎不占当前世界人口的 12%,其出生率呈自由落体状态,每对夫妇生育 1.2 至 1.6 胎。 如今,白人对白人发动战争意味着白人肯定会灭绝。

    北约联盟会放弃其犹太复国主义煽动的对俄罗斯的战争吗?

  83. @Psychotic Break

    我敢肯定,他们正在研制用于群体形成精神病的疫苗,每季度强制注射一次,以造福人类。
    C19 是未来人群控制行动的成功蓝图。 问题是,有很多创造性的方法可以逃脱大规模谋杀,他们正在为自己试图发布一些新的东西来分散之前的害羞节目的注意力。
    欢迎来到小丑世界——现在在所有已知和未知的电视/设备/收音机上播放。

    • 同意: Fox
  84. Ned kelly 说:
    @HdC

    你也可以参加考试——Untertruppe。 把你的光头党放在一起。

  85. 大屠杀是牺牲:

    不同类别的血腥牺牲

    [更多]

    (a) 在各种血祭中,燔祭居首位。 它被称为“升天祭”('õlah)和“大屠杀”(kâlil); Septuagint holokautoma; 在斐洛,holokauston),因为整个受害者——除了臀部肌肉和皮革——都是通过火制成的,在烟雾和蒸气中升到上帝那里(见大屠杀)。 虽然没有排除赎罪的想法(利未记 1:4),但它在一定程度上退到了背景中,因为在受害者被火完全毁灭的过程中,人对上帝的绝对服从是为了表达。 大屠杀确实是最古老、最频繁和最广泛的祭祀(参见创世记 4:4;8:20;22:2 sqq.;约伯记 1:5;42:8)。 作为“永恒的”祭物,它必须每天在早上和晚上提供两次(参见出埃及记 29:38 sqq.;利未记 6:9 sqq.;民数记 28:3 sqq.,等等) . 作为卓越的崇拜牺牲,它包括所有其他种类的牺牲。 [关于祭坛,见祭坛(圣经中)。]

    (b) 赎罪的观念在赎罪祭中得到了特别有力的表达,其中分为两类,罪祭和赎罪祭。 它们之间的区别在于,前者更关心人的罪孽的赦免(expiatio),后者更关心对所造成的伤害的补偿(satisfactio)。

    首先来看赎罪祭(sacrifium pro peccato, chattath),我们发现,根据律法,并非所有道德上的过失都可以用它来弥补。 被排除在赎罪之外的是所有蓄意犯罪或“举手之罪”,这涉及违反圣约,并以犯罪者作为惩罚,将其从人民中驱逐出去,因为他“背叛了耶和华”(民数记 15:30 sq .) 此类罪行属于省略割礼(创世记 17:14)、亵​​渎安息日(出埃及记 31:14)、亵​​渎耶和华(利未记 24:16)、未能庆祝逾越节(民数记 9:2 sqq. ),“吃血”(利未记 7:26 sq.),在赎罪日工作或不禁食(利未记 23:21)。 赎罪只适用于因无知、健忘或草率而犯下的错误。 仪式的决定与其说是过犯的种类和严重性,不如说是由要为之献上赎罪祭的人的素质。 因此,对于大祭司或全体人民的过错,规定了一头牛犊(利未记 4:3;16:3); 对于部落首领的人(利未记 4:23),以及在某些节日,一只公山羊; 对于普通以色列人,一只母山羊或母羊羔(利未记 4:28;5:6); 用于分娩后的净化和某些其他合法的不洁、斑鸠或雏鸽(利未记 12:6;15:14、29)。 最后提到的也可能被穷人用来代替其中一只小牛(利未记 5:7;14:22)。 那些连鸽子都无法献上的穷人,在普通的过犯的情况下,可能会牺牲十分之一的面粉伊菲,但没有油或香(利未记 5:11 sqq.)。 抹血的方法因罪的不同程度而不同,不是单纯的洒血,而是在燔祭坛或香坛的四角上擦,之后剩下的血倒在祭坛脚下。 关于这个仪式的细节,应该查阅圣经考古学手册。 牺牲者通常和最好的牺牲部分(脂肪、肾脏、肝叶)被烧在燔祭坛上,而牺牲者的其余部分则被祭司在外院作为圣餐吃掉。圣所(利未记 6:18 平方)。 如果任何血被带到圣所,肉必须被带到灰堆,并在那里同样燃烧(利未记 4:1 sqq.;6:24 sqq.)。

    赎罪祭 (sacrificium pro delicto, asham) 是专门为要求赔偿的罪和过犯而指定的,无论是圣所的物质利益还是个人的物质利益受到损害——例如,挪用给圣所的礼物,欺骗邻居,保留圣所他人的财产等(参见利未记 5:15 sqq.;6:2 sq.;民数记 5:6 sqq.),物质补偿被认为比造成的损失高五分之一(因此五分之六必须支付)。 此外,必须献上赎罪祭,包括在祭坛北侧献祭的一只公羊。 血洒在祭坛周围,烧成脂肪的部分; 其余的肉作为神圣不可侵犯的被圣地的祭司吃掉(利未记 7:1 sqq.)。

    (c) 第三类血祭包括“平安祭”(victima pacifica, shelamim),分为三类:感谢或赞美的祭祀、兑现誓愿的祭祀和完全自愿的祭祀. 一般而言,和平牺牲有两个特点:
    (i) 非凡的“波”与“升”仪式;
    (ii) 与他们有关的公共祭祀餐。

    所有允许献祭的动物(甚至是雌性)都可以使用,在完全“自愿献祭”的情况下,即使是那些并非完全没有缺陷的动物(利未记 22:23)。 在洒血之前,仪式与燔祭相同,只是杀戮不一定发生在祭坛的北侧(利未记 3:1 sqq.;7:11 sqq.)。 像赎罪祭一样,通常的脂肪部分必须在祭坛上焚烧。 然而,在切割受害者时,必须首先分别切断胸部和右肩(Septuagint brachion; Vulgate armus),并与他们一起进行“波浪”(tenupha)和“举”(teruma)仪式. 根据塔木德的传统,“挥手”是这样进行的:祭司将受害者的乳房放在献祭者的手上,然后将自己的手放在这个人的手下,前后移动它们以表示上帝与奉献者之间给予和接受的互惠。 然后用右肩进行同样的仪式,不同的是“起伏”或“teruma”包括向上和向下的运动。 在这些仪式中使用的胸部和肩部属于祭司,他们可以在“干净的地方”吃掉它们(利未记 10:14)。 他们还从补充食物中得到一个饼(利未记 7:14)。 献祭者在同一天召集他的朋友共进晚餐,在圣所附近食用献祭后剩下的肉。 利未清洁的客人,特别是利未人和穷人,被接纳(申命记 16:11;利未记 19 sqq.),并且在这顿饭中可以自由地喝葡萄酒。 任何感恩或赞美的祭品都必须在第二天烧掉。 只有在誓言和完全自愿献祭的情况下,其余的可以在第二天吃掉,但此后剩下的所有东西都必须在第三天烧掉(利未记 7:15 sqq.;19:6 sqq.)。 平安祭的想法以神圣的友谊和参与神圣的餐桌为中心,因为献祭者作为客人和餐桌的同伴,以某种方式参与了对主的献祭。 但是,由于这种神圣的友谊,当所有三种祭祀结合在一起时,赎罪祭通常在燔祭之前,后者在平安祭之前。

    除了刚才描述的定期献祭之外,摩西律法还承认其他特别的献祭,至少必须提到这些。 这些属于献祭,但只有一次在西奈盟约结束时(出埃及记 24:4 sqq.),那些发生在祭司和利未人的奉献(出埃及记 29:1 sqq.;利未记 8;民数记 8) :5 sqq.) 和某些偶尔的祭祀,例如治愈的麻风病人的净化祭祀(利未记 14:1 sqq.)、红牛的祭祀(民数记 19:1 sqq.)、嫉妒的祭祀(民数记) 5:12 sqq.),以及拿细耳人的牺牲(民数记 6:9 sqq.)。 由于其非凡的特性,可能包括每年献祭的逾越节羔羊(出埃及记 12:3 sqq.;申命记 16:1 sqq.)和赎罪日的两只公山羊(利未记 16:1 sqq) .) 在这个班级中。 随着弥赛亚的出现,按照拉比的观点,整个马赛克祭祀制度即将结束,事实上在提图斯摧毁圣殿之后(公元 70 年)就是如此。 关于献祭的人,见 PRIESTHOOD。

    ++++++++++++++++

    在第二次世界大战中对犹太人(以及他们一个人)犯下的罪行是大屠杀吗?

    好吧,如果您认为德国人杀害犹太人是一种崇拜行为,并且如果您认为一旦他们牺牲了犹太人,德国人就吃掉了他们,那当然,那是一场大屠杀。

    如果做不到这一点,二战中发生在犹太人身上的事情与二战中发生在其他受害者身上的事情没有什么不同

  86. @saggy

    我只是在寻求九个美国人投票让我上任。

    请回复我评论中提供的证据。

    我不在乎任何人的阴谋论。

    第三帝国内部——阿尔伯特·斯佩尔

    https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0006D5SBC

  87. Poco 说:
    @Ned kelly

    犹太人从不做任何坏事,你这个愤怒的反犹分子。

    • 不同意: HdC
    • 哈哈: Sepp
  88. @Ed Case

    天哪,埃德——这和我的东西完全不一样。 您是否因“长冠状病毒病”而遭受脑雾困扰?

  89. anon[335]• 免责声明 说:
    @Bookish1

    血腥的废话只是过去 80 年来充斥着美国文化的反白人宣传的一部分。

  90. @Anonymous

    我想这会让你成为一个无用白痴的教科书例子。

    “14 年 1911 月 XNUMX 日,斯托雷平被一名与革命团体有关联的警察开枪打死。”
    ——尼古拉斯·里亚萨诺夫斯基,《俄罗斯历史》,第 4 版,p。 415。

    就连索尔仁尼琴都知道刺客的真实背景,并在 1914 年 XNUMX 月的小说中明确表示,他认为斯托雷平是极右翼阴谋的受害者。 后来试图将刺客描绘成“犹太革命者”,这只是索尔仁尼琴意识形态曲折的一部分,他不再提及令人不快的事实。

    • 回复: @Anonymous
  91. L1b3rt45 说:

    大饥荒纪念日是什么时候?

  92. Sepp 说:
    @SolontoCroesus

    希伯来人不仅是暗杀和恐怖主义方面的专家,他们还是种族灭绝方面的专家。 我建议,每当他们开始尖叫“6 万死去的犹太人”时,他们实际上是在把我们吸进一种仪式中,以掩盖他们犯下的另一场种族灭绝罪行。

    • 同意: SolontoCroesus
    • 回复: @geokat62
    , @Petermx
  93. Trinity 说:
    @Bookish1

    不能肯定的是,目前这批犹太人喜欢叛徒垃圾。

  94. Exile 说:

    从跑题、切题和挖洞评论的数量来看,Dalton 博士似乎超出了目标——就像往常一样。

    鼻子疯了,(((巨魔)))是狂野的。

  95. Sepp 说:
    @Sick of Orcs

    在奥斯威辛“死亡集中营”生孩子的犹太妇女。 哈哈。 犹太人和他们的谎言就像豆荚里的两颗豌豆。

    • 谢谢: Z-man, Sick of Orcs, HdC
    • 回复: @anon
  96. @Sepp

    1948 年世界年鉴中的这个数字是在 1938 年预测的,并不是任何战后人口普查结果的结果。 《世界年鉴》在战后等了几年才声称公布任何战后数据。 实际上,一年后的 1949 年版《世界年鉴》现在给出了 11 万这个数字,作为他们从《美国犹太人年鉴》中得出的战后估计。 当然,考虑到战后时代的混乱状况,这 11 万个数字很容易被低估。 但关键是,《世界年鉴》本身从未声称将战后调查作为他们在 15.7 年发表的 1948+ 百万数字的基础。他们只是重印了一个旧的战前估计,即世界犹太人口可能预期会发生什么如果没有战争。

    • 回复: @Sepp
    , @Anonymous
    , @Colin Wright
  97. geokat62 说:
    @Sepp

    ……他们实际上是在把我们吸进一种仪式中,以掩盖他们犯下的另一场种族灭绝罪行。

    “但是将它们与世界上相对较小的犹太人(在第二次世界大战之前大约16万)结合在一起,不可避免的结论是: 按人均计算,犹太人是 XNUMX 世纪最大的屠杀者, 以巨大的优势保持着这种不幸的区别,并且没有其他国籍可以与之相提并论。 但是, 通过好莱坞惊人的炼金术,过去一百年来最伟大的杀手不知何故变成了被视为最大受害者的转变,这种转变如此看似难以置信,以至于后代肯定会惊叹不已。” – 罗恩·安兹

    • 谢谢: Z-man, mark green
  98. Sepp 说:
    @Ned kelly

    内德·凯利 说:”

    “作为一个犹太人,我能做的最糟糕的事情是什么?”

    特拉维夫的这个 C-Jew hasbara 巨魔自爆了。 哈哈。

    犹太人不聪明,他们甚至不会撒谎。 犹太人唯一擅长的就是一直撒谎。

    • 回复: @Ned kelly
  99. @Rich

    我称之为“魔法黑人综合症”(MNS)。 正是当(((他们)))安装了流畅的说话魔术师黑人奥巴马时,在怀特上醒来成为国家叙事的 CRT。
    我们欠 Magik Negroz 数万亿美元的斯巴伯里 uh hunnerd an fy yerz。

  100. Sepp 说:
    @Patrick McNally

    咬脚踝,事实核查,hasbara 骗子非凡是 baaaaack。

    像往常一样,他没有在讨论中添加任何内容,胡言乱语,并且从不用任何“事实”证据来支持他的断言。

    他们只是重印了一个旧的战前估计,即如果没有战争,世界犹太人口可能会是什么。

    如果世界历书在等待战争结束,那为什么他们每年都会改变他们的“估计”?

    站起来或闭嘴,混蛋。

    • 回复: @Patrick McNally
  101. Anon[309]• 免责声明 说:
    @mark green

    我们可以指出像希尔伯格这样的人。

    更有可能的是,这个 6 万的数字只是被虚构出来的。 如果你愿意的话,一个独立的综合体。 提示 Origa outro。

  102. Petermx 说:
    @Sepp

    他们隐藏了很多重要的事实,并在很多其他事情上撒了谎。 我认为被掩盖的东西和谎言一样重要,我从未在其他任何地方读过这篇文章,但我想我可以理解苏联有多少人欢迎德国军队作为解放者(表明德国人对这些人很好),而一个种族群体脱颖而出,因为犹太人受到了更粗暴的对待。 原因是犹太人主要负责,而这被故意掩盖,因为这是德国人和犹太人各自成为最大敌人的关键。 捕获高层(将军、上校甚至一个国家的领导人)总是比普通步兵重要得多。

    除了犹太人作为游击队员的角色、他们邪恶的战争方式(苏联没有签署管理战争规则的条约)、他们在推动西方国家攻击德国方面的作用以及他们在数百万乌克兰人饥饿中的作用之外,我们有俄罗斯总统普京对一群犹太人的讲话,说第一届苏维埃政府的 80% 到 85% 是犹太人,现在有了这个; 一本由德国人在 1937 年写的书,“揭示了共产主义犹太人是 11 个主要斯大林时代古拉格或集中营中的 12 个的指挥官,其中包括集中营系统负责人马特维·伯曼和赫歇尔·耶胡达。” 更多证据证明“犹太布尔什维克主义”一词的合理性。 还有什么我们不知道的? 正如德国领导人为输掉战争付出了最惨重的代价一样,犹太布尔什维克领导人也为战败付出了最惨重的代价。

    • 回复: @Sepp
  103. @Trinity

    《出埃及记》详细描述了上帝如何亲自带领他们脱离囚禁,并在他们穿越充满敌意的沙漠(如果没有他的保护,这将杀死他们所有人)前往他特别为他们预留的土地的途中喂养、浇水和保护他们。 然而他们却在抱怨,每一步都在抱怨忘恩负义,无谓地把自己置于危险之中,将自己从向他们示好的上帝的保护下脱身。 换句话说,他们造成了自己的痛苦,这是他们已经成为无与伦比的事情,并且没有其他群体能够以如此多的可预测性和规律性来接近。 这是最接近人类任何部分的先天性精神疾病的疾病。

  104. Corrupt 说:

    “德国、奥匈帝国和意大利三国同盟。”

    不要忘记奥斯曼帝国

  105. Ned kelly 说:
    @Sepp

    G'arvo 对你来说也是……我在那儿有点南……你可以查一下我……相当有名。

  106. @Ann Nonny Mouse

    不允许他们离开这个国家。 没有签证。

    不让他们走? 真的吗? 难道你不想在很短的时间内把他们赶出你的国家,并尽可能远离它吗?

  107. GenFranco 说:
    @Sepp

    林肯? 你是说约翰威尔克斯布斯是犹太人还是为犹太团体工作? Wilkes 是一个英文名字,Booth 是一个苏格兰名字。 他是南方贵族和欧式文化的铁杆捍卫者。 他厌恶北方粗鲁、贪婪的工业文化。

    这里的理论是什么? 布斯是否为支持北方工业的犹太银行家工作? 或者他是由在罗德岛进行国际奴隶贸易的犹太奴隶贩子支付的(即使在 CSA 禁止奴隶贸易后仍继续这样做)?

    在没有适当分析和审查的情况下堆积起来对我们这一方没有帮助。

  108. @Sepp

    1938 年进行了几项估计,其中包括对当年的估计以及对以后年份的预测。 在战争年代的混乱中,《世界年鉴》没有任何可靠的方法可供参考,所以几年来,他们发布了您给出的 1942 年数字等估计值,而在其他年份,他们有时只是发布了战前的预测。 直到 1949 年,《世界年鉴》才开始发表他们认为是新研究的战后估计(该估计是否正确是另一个问题)。 1948 年 15.7+ 百万的数字只是对 1938 年的一个较旧的预测数字的重印。没有战后数据。

    • 同意: Haxo Angmark
    • 回复: @Sepp
  109. Sepp 说:
    @Petermx

    从 1918 年 XNUMX 月开始,犹太布尔什维克在整个东欧进行了小型种族灭绝。但它并没有就此停止。 在柏林和整个德国,犹太布尔什维克正在谋杀他们的反对派并恐吓人民。 如果不是整个德国的自由军团,波罗的海和可能的波兰都将落入犹太-布尔什维克手中,

    乌克兰从苏联独立了几年,但最终犹太人在 1923 年接管了他们,就像他们在 2014 年所做的那样。这就是大饥荒的真正原因,它要谋杀所有可能抵抗完全犹太化的最优秀的乌克兰人。

    墨索里尼在意大利上台主要是对 1920 年代初期战后意大利的犹太共产主义煽动、暗杀和恐怖主义的反应。

    西班牙在第一次世界大战期间保持中立,但战后他们也成为犹太人、他们的布尔什维克傀儡和共济会的目标。 如果不是希特勒和墨索里尼的干预,西班牙肯定会完全落入犹太共产主义者手中,好像还没有造成足够的破坏。

    二战期间,被称为马奇的西班牙犹太共产主义者的遗体与法国共产主义者合作,在整个法国煽动、暗杀和实施恐怖主义。 丘吉尔为他们提供了武器、后勤和金钱,但他们经常使用武器对付盟军,尽管他们保存的最严重的恐怖行为是用来对付他们居住的法国人和试图拯救法国的德国人来自犹太共产主义。 戴高乐入侵自由法国后,犹太共产主义者和他们的马基兄弟在法国全境发动了大规模的恐怖运动。 戴高乐正在与犹太共产主义者竞争,看谁先征服巴黎。 Maquis 和他们的犹太共产主义同胞不愿使用英国和美国花费巨资空运给他们的武器来对付德国人,而是将其保留用于对付共产主义革命中的同盟国。他们与斯大林计划在 1945 年发生。

    波兰可能是战争之间和二战后发生的所有希伯来人背刺中最犯规的。 当然,冯·拉斯的刺客格林斯潘声称他这样做是因为德国人要将他的波兰犹太父母驱逐回他们来自的波兰。 显然,早在二战之前,犹太人就对波兰怀恨在心。 重要的是,他们发现甚至在 NSDAP 之后的德国也比一战后的波兰更加热情好客。 这是因为犹太人鄙视波兰人民,并在 1918-21 年曾试图在那里进行一场革命。 当然,当斯大林在 2 年德国入侵波兰两周后终于入侵波兰时,波兰的犹太人站起来支持他们的共产主义兄弟。 又一个 Judeo 在背后捅了一刀,好像欧洲还没有遭受数百人的痛苦。

    当国防军最终于 1941 年解放东波兰时,所有共产主义犹太人都向东逃亡,成为斯大林傀儡波兰政府的成员,而任何愚蠢到无法与德国人同流合污的波兰犹太资产阶级最终都落入了古拉格。

    1944 年,当波兰 AK(本土军队)开始试图“解放”波兰时,他们正在与三个敌人作战:德国人、红军和犹太恐怖分子。 当然,恐怖的俄罗斯红军与犹太恐怖分子“游击队”结盟。

    故事就这样继续下去。 在 1848 年犹太共产主义革命之后的一个世纪里,犹太人一直在对他们的欧洲东道主实施恐怖主义和叛国,同时在“进步”的旗帜下将自己嗜血的背叛和嗜血的欲望投射到基督教欧洲人身上。结束“6 万死去的犹太人”大屠杀。

    • 谢谢: Joe Levantine, HdC, Druid55
    • 回复: @Petermx
    , @Armoric
  110. Sepp 说:
    @Patrick McNally

    听着迪克杂草,我可以像你一样轻松地写下一堆废话。 你所做的只是重复你同样的谎言。 提供一些参考来备份您的断言或仅提供 STFU。

    • 回复: @Patrick McNally
  111. @Patrick McNally

    你误会了。 博格罗夫是一个富裕的犹太家庭的后裔,并且像许多这样的人一样,通过完全共产主义来反抗他的遗产。 然而,关于 Okhrana 参与 Stolypin 谋杀案,你是对的:就像几年后的奥地利大公一样,他的“安全”是个笑话。

    至于道尔顿的文章,除了他在一战中对意大利的错误,这是一篇好文章。 有关第一次世界大战后犹太复国主义“1”主张的进一步证据,请参阅 Don Heddesheimer。 第一次大屠杀:犹太人募捐 第一次世界大战期间和之后的大屠杀声明运动 (芝加哥,2005年)。

    • 回复: @Patrick McNally
  112. Fact Cheka 说:

    总记得

    真相不怕调查

    这就是为什么有法律保护大屠杀神话的原因。 即使是保护客户免受这种残酷的犹太法律,否认大屠杀的律师也在自我控告自己。 偷偷撒谎的懦夫犹太人得到了所有的角落。

    这种疯狂必须停止!

    • 同意: HdC
    • 回复: @geokat62
  113. Petermx 说:
    @Sepp

    谢谢。 当我们能够证明犹太人拥有这样的权力,正在使用它,并且我们能够将这一点告知公众,那么人们将不再能够说犹太人是完全无辜的受害者。 东欧人知道犹太人并不是无能为力和无辜的,他们在 70、80、90 多年前被许多人所厌恶,现在被压制但也许不会被遗忘。

  114. 回到行星现实……

    可能正是对这种严重夸张的记忆,导致最初关于实际大屠杀的报道受到如此怀疑。 到 1942 年至 1944 年,犹太人以“总是”声称他们是可以想象的最可怕暴行的受害者而享有当之无愧的声誉。

    事实上,看看最初的报告可能会很有趣 水晶之夜,在这一点上的任何夸大,然后当更准确的数字可用时的任何反应。 这种犹太人夸张的经历是多久以前的事了?

  115. @Patrick McNally

    说,也许你是某人的代理人。 回想。

  116. @Sepp

    《世界年鉴》本身在 11,266,600 年发布了 1949 的数字。您是否幻想《世界年鉴》在发布了他们认为 1949 年的真实数字后,不知何故被吓到发布了一个他们认为 1948 年不正确的数字? 15.7+ 这个数字只是 1938 年战前预测的结转。如果有人真的相信《世界年鉴》能够进行新的研究并可靠地达到 15.7+ 百万的数字,那么这将使 Arthur Butz 提出的大多数论点无效在 1970 年代。 巴茨的大部分论点都围绕着这样一种观点,即在战争期间首先发生了如此多的犹太人口大规模迁移,之后无法得出可靠的数字。 因此,《世界年鉴》在 11 年提供的 1949 万这个数字是不可靠的。 但同理,1948年再版的战前预测更加荒谬。

    • 回复: @Sepp
  117. 这种将纳粹视为邪恶化身的执念导致了所谓的“逃避现实”。

    在替罪羊的仪式中,人的罪孽被投射到山羊身上,山羊被石头砸死或被烧死或以某种可怕的方式被杀死。

    在“替罪羊”中,各种个人和团体通过援引纳粹的邪恶来使自己感觉或看起来在道德上优越。 “纳粹做到了,天啊!!” 是的,就好像他们的手是如此干净或通过将自己的邪恶投向纳粹鬼魂而得到净化。

    现在,这并不是要否认纳粹邪恶的事实。 此外,他们所做(并试图做)的一些事情确实超出了现代西方文明的范围。

    尽管如此,很多事情看起来更糟,仅仅是因为纳粹做了这件事,而事实上,其他人也做了同样的事情或更糟。

    例如,考虑一下 Philip K. Dick 对某些 SS 期刊的反应。
    党卫军军官写到他的睡眠是如何被饥饿的犹太儿童的哭声打扰的。 迪克非常愤怒,他猜测纳粹不是人类,而是人皮中的怪物生物。

    现在,党卫军军官肯定是个冷酷无情的混蛋,一个怪物。 但他真的和其他意识形态、国家、文明等等的怪物有那么大的区别吗? 真的吗? 当数百万乌克兰人被饿死时,犹太布尔什维克有多敏感? 当玛德琳奥尔布赖特说杀死 XNUMX 万阿拉伯孩子是“值得的”时,她有多敏感? 在柬埔寨和越南投下大量凝固汽油弹和炸弹的美国飞行员有多敏感? 以色列犹太人和犹太复国主义全球主义者对利比亚、叙利亚、伊拉克等地所有恐怖事件的受害者有多敏感?其中大部分是由美国及其盟友、所有世界犹太人的傀儡煽动和支持的?

    这并不是说纳粹是好人之类的。 这并不是要在所有群体都受到同样指责的情况下推动道德对等。 在某些方面,纳粹确实是极端的。 但他们的残暴和不人道的行为相当“普遍”,或者在其他民族中司空见惯。
    考虑。 如果日本不同意无条件投降,美国计划再向日本投下 10 或 12 颗原子弹。
    而且我们从最近的事件中知道,世界犹太人对非犹太人完全是轻蔑和漠不关心的。 对他们来说,非犹太人要么是顺从的被剥削的牛,要么是被屠宰的有问题的牛。 大多数犹太精英是否因为他们对非犹太人所做的一切而失眠? Chuck Schumer、Alan Dershowitz 或一些好莱坞犹太人是否因为巴勒斯坦人或叙利亚人受到的伤害而失眠了一分钟? 或者关于萨克勒家族对白人工人阶级做了什么?

    因此,虽然一些纳粹邪恶在现代是独一无二的,但他们的残暴行为与其他人的所作所为相似。 此外,其他人所做的一些事情与大屠杀非常接近。 可以肯定的是,在 21 世纪,犹太人是世界上排名第一的屠夫和精神病患者。 美国支持的也门战争是针对伊朗的演习,导致该国遭受可怕的苦难。 事实证明,美国再次当然是在犹太复国主义者的要求下,一直在支持叙利亚和整个中东的恐怖分子。 犹太教的美国是恐怖主义的最大支持者,以打击恐怖主义的名义入侵其他国家,传播恐怖主义。 它还能变得更加两面派和卑鄙到什么地步?

    如果那个党卫军军官参与了对犹太儿童的毒杀,他的邪恶将是独一无二的可怕。 但他对犹太儿童的漠不关心与美国精英按照犹太人的要求使用制裁摧毁整个国家的态度没有什么不同。 在伊朗和叙利亚等地,许多人被剥夺了食品、药品和其他基本必需品,这一切都是因为犹太人要求美国接受以色列并摧毁犹太人不喜欢的任何人和任何人。

    将纳粹视为终极邪恶,让自己对自己、自己的人民和盟友的邪恶视而不见,这越来越令人厌烦。 这只是同样的老套路。
    美国人是不是该停止指向德国人并喘着粗气,“哦,我的,纳粹做到了”,并开始审视犹太强权及其美国骗子对世界所做的事情?

    只是问巴勒斯坦人。

    但是,我敢肯定菲利普·K·迪克特别生气,因为孩子们是犹太人。 在将犹太人神圣化的安妮弗兰克主义的饮食中长大后,有人可能不关心饥饿的犹太儿童,这对他来说是令人发指的。 但如果他读到关于非犹太儿童的书,他会那么在意吗? 几乎可以肯定不是。 可以肯定的是,犹太人的神圣化导致了非犹太人的相对非人性化。 如果犹太人是神圣的,那就意味着无论他们做什么,他们总是善良的。 因此,即使犹太人表现得像新纳粹分子并在整个中东和北非屠杀人民(并呼吁对白人进行 Lebensraum 大替代),他们始终是一群“无辜的”安妮·弗兰克,而任何反抗的人,无论是白人还是巴勒斯坦,是一个“纳粹”。

  118. Franz 说:
    @CelestiaQuesta

    我很好奇在跨越“界线”之前会问多少问题。

    它是通用的吗? 缉毒署是否会被仇恨执法机构追随,罗恩和他所有的朋友、家人和海报会不会来?

    未来几年将决定这个国家是否会迎来它的三百周年。 现在我打赌反对。

    • 回复: @azureamaranthine
  119. @Rex.Reptilius

    Holo='牺牲'。

    不,全息 = 整体。 全息图是牺牲克吗? 当然不是。

    要么所有犹太人都被烧毁,要么其中 6m 被完全烧毁。 没有回旋余地。 事实上,“大屠杀幸存者”这个说法是在否认他们都被烧死了。

    种族灭绝大屠杀发生了绝对是一个巨大的问题。 因为它没有发生。 我们知道这一点是因为非常聪明的犹太人团队已经有几十年的时间来寻找证据,或者至少是这些涉嫌谋杀的证据。 结果:zilch!

    你的美国退伍军人没有看到一百万被谋杀的犹太人。 变得真实!

  120. Fact Cheka 说:

    几年前我在柏林,当时这个犹太精神病患者在那个丑陋的大屠杀纪念馆和所有那些石块一起踢球。 我们喝了很多优质的德国啤酒,啤酒伴随着小便。 我们在那个地方小便,以纪念那六百万个谎言,这些谎言像我们脖子上的犹太人靴子一样压住了我们。

    我们玩得很开心,我们甚至向所有与犹太人压迫作斗争的战士行罗马式敬礼。 欢乐时光,我们甚至制作了一段视频。

  121. @Haxo Angmark

    博格罗夫于 1906 年加入 Okhrana。他不是革命者,尽管这些为秘密警察工作的特工的动机通常是模糊的。 但他的实际活动是向社会革命党人、社会民主党人和无政府主义者通报情况。 这些是甚至在稍好一点的索尔仁尼琴都知道的事实。 这就是为什么索尔仁尼琴在 1914 年 XNUMX 月把对斯托雷平的打击视为内部工作的原因。

    Heddesheimer 在 15 多年前首次问世时,我就得到了它。 尽管人们应该注意不要夸大论据,但它所拥有的东西值得一试。 该书中引用的早几十年的报告实际上并没有试图声称蓄意屠杀,而是谈论饥饿和饥饿的状况(通常是在战争的背景下),声称“六百万”受到死亡威胁. 值得注意的是,即使在当时,“六百万”这个数字也很容易被抛出。 但这与二战的故事并没有那么紧密的相似之处,以至于它可以减轻单独检查后来的人口统计数据的需要。

    • 回复: @Haxo Angmark
    , @Wielgus
  122. Z-man 说:
    @Priss Factor

    这是历史频道每周的“邪恶纳粹周”。 洗脑还在继续。 但这将达到荒谬的地步,并最终推回真相和侦察。

    • 回复: @Priss Factor
  123. anarchyst 说:

    XNUMXD压花不锈钢板 “美国历史频道” 在美国应该改名为 “美国希特勒频道” 因为它描绘和传播了关于二战、德国和阿道夫·希特勒的所有谎言和宣传。 没有涉及阿道夫·希特勒的宣传计划的日子就不会过去 “美国历史频道”...
    根据方案 “美国历史频道”,希特勒是个瘾君子,无能为力,充斥着梅毒和其他性传播疾病,拥有高科技的“超级武器”,拥有“外星技术”,先进的飞行和反重力技术,却无法“赢得”第二次世界大战。
    任何在该频道上观看希特勒谎言和捏造的思想开放的人都可以很容易地看出这都是废话,尤其是当所谓的“大屠杀™”被插入到几乎所有这些节目“宝石”中时。 那些瘦弱的斑疹伤寒受害者尸体的旧照片不断被摆在周围,以提醒“我们”希特勒真的是多么邪恶。 (是的,没错)。
    德国比当时的美国都要先进得多,因此“行动回形针”开始了,在第二次世界大战总结之后,美国抢占了德国最伟大的科学头脑。
    纵观全局(通常被忽略),“德国国家”受到世界其他地区的攻击,并且“坚持”其原则的时间远远超出了预期。
    希特勒最大的“罪过”是将劳动力货币化(赋予劳动力真正的“价值”)和反对罗斯柴尔德银行。 反对犹太人经营的银行使他成为“敌人#1”。 他还知道有一部分布尔什维克犹太人正在德国境内煽动共产主义革命。 大多数人都不知道他与犹太复国主义者达成的秘密协议,以“鼓励”犹太人移民到当时称为巴勒斯坦的地区。 当时的德国政府和犹太复国主义者都庆祝这些协议。 历史的这一方面从未被提及 “美国希特勒频道”. “世界犹太人”在 1933 年(是的,1933 年)向德国宣战的事实也不是。
    如果“最伟大的一代”能看到今天的世界和它变成的样子,被犹太人控制,他们就会脱掉美国制服,站在德国人一边……

    • 回复: @Anon
  124. Anonymous[375]• 免责声明 说:
    @Patrick McNally

    你还是个有用的白痴。 相信我,同志:情况更糟。

    • 同意: Sepp
  125. Anonymous[375]• 免责声明 说:
    @Patrick McNally

    今天肯定有人能赚到谢克尔!

    顺便说一句,15.5-11 = 4.5。

    • 谢谢: Sepp
  126. @Ned kelly

    当然,但实际上俄罗斯在二战结束时在进入德国的途中“发现”了犹太人的万人坑,而这些坟墓不知何故在俄罗斯发现它们之前或之后从未存在过。

    这只是胜利者写虚假历史的案例,而你是一个撒谎的垃圾袋,试图做同样的事情。

  127. @Franz

    这个国家根本不可能活到 2030 年。

    • 同意: Franz
  128. @mocissepvis

    让他们离开的问题是,一旦他们到达安全距离,他们总是会声称他们被屠杀和迫害。

    我们来谈谈狼来了的男孩。 对于这种欺骗行为,有两种合乎逻辑的惩罚。 当然,我们都知道结局涉及完全自然的正义,当男孩的哭声被忽视时,他被一头真正的狼吞噬了。

    然而,想象一个更个人公正的人的可能性是无法想象的,他们在大约百万分之一的狼叫声之后,自发地把这个病态的不悔改的男孩打得昏昏沉沉,很快就把他拖进了一英里的树林里夜幕降临之前。 或者把他扔进狗粮厂的料斗里。

    犹太人应该在他们自己的力量和他们自己的激励下尽快离开,或者根本不期望离开。 更“自然”的人类往往会考虑自然后果,时机已近成熟。

  129. @Arthur MacBride

    ((对美的战争))具有深刻的哲学基础。

    • 同意: Arthur MacBride
  130. @Z-man

    就像大屠杀是新的基督教一样。

    很长一段时间以来,基督徒都在讲述和重述耶稣被异教罗马人钉死在十字架上的故事。 天啊,他们怎么会做出这种事!

    没关系,基督徒自己犯下了无数暴行,比耶稣被钉十字架还要糟糕得多。 但那时,耶稣是上帝的儿子,所以他的死比基督徒堆积的所有死人更重要。

    犹太人也是这么想的。 即使在 20 世纪还有许多其他暴行,纳粹也杀死了犹太人,即神圣的圣民。 这就是为什么他们特别邪恶。

    如果纳粹只杀死/毒死吉普赛人和斯拉夫人,我认为我们不会听到太多关于此的消息。

  131. Trinity 说:

    让犹太人生气的是他们最终被希特勒和德国追究责任。 之前的一张海报引用了犹太人在亚美尼亚种族灭绝、乌克兰种族灭绝、德国人、巴勒斯坦人的大屠杀(又称种族灭绝)中的作用。您还可以将南非白人的种族灭绝以及今天的美国白人和欧洲白人的种族灭绝添加到该列表中。 至少六十多年来,犹太人领导并资助了一场针对美国白人的战争。 希特勒敢于为他心爱的国家和人民而战,给犹太人带来了一点业力。 说实话,德国人和俄罗斯人遭受的痛苦远远超过犹太人。
    L

  132. 旧约中成百上千的传奇故事证明了两件事——犹太人永远无法说出一件该死的事情的真相,而且从来不缺少相信他们的傻瓜。

    • 同意: Druid55
  133. @Trinity

    那是因为白人不是部落民族。

    • 回复: @Trinity
  134. Anon[309]• 免责声明 说:
    @anarchyst

    如果你愿意,你可以避免成为“最伟大的一代”。 每一代人都有它的挑战,它的召唤。 你会支持伊朗的神圣斗争吗? 这是你的时刻。 你会在历史的正确一边战斗吗?

    伊朗人民以精神价值观为生。 女人还是很纯洁的。 人们重视家庭、传统和荣誉。 你会迎接挑战吗?

  135. Trinity 说:
    @Carroll price

    白人最好学得很快,开始像部落人一样思考和行动。 面对现实,怀特在过去的几十年里被屠杀,因为他对自己的人民没有忠诚。

    白人在街头、学校、工作场所、监狱和监狱等被屠杀和强奸。白人不断逃往红州或沿路的另一个出口,但这只会持续很长时间。 白人毫不战而放弃了这个国家,一些愚蠢和精神病患者甚至在宣扬自己的灭亡。 我想不出任何其他种族会支持自己的自杀。

    • 回复: @geokat62
  136. Iva 说:

    我只是不明白为什么人们认为只有犹太人死在集中营。 实际上,最初两年,波兰人是这些集中营中唯一的囚犯。 二战期间死亡的波兰人比波兰公民的犹太人多。 其他犹太人是从其他国家带来的。
    我读到俄罗斯解放营拿走了所有文件,据他们说,在所有营地中,有 233,000 人死亡。 我想知道为什么俄罗斯不释放他们? 这些文件是俄罗斯所谓的“特朗普牌”,所以犹太人和以色列不要管它们。 有趣的是,他们并没有像要求波兰那样要求归还留在俄罗斯的财产。 波兰在 40 年给了美国 1959 万美元。 对于哪些财产[被夷为平地? 波兰政府和人民重建了这个,他们想要现在的价格和新的建筑物。
    大屠杀是由犹太精英策划的。 犹太教授亨利·马科 (henry Makow) 写了关于纳粹与犹太团体负责人秘密会面的文章,这些团体正在向德国人打电话消灭犹太人。 犹太人本杰明富尔福德称他们为假犹太人(卡扎里黑手党),他们想从贫穷而诚实的犹太人身上获利。

    • 回复: @saggy
  137. geokat62 说:
    @Trinity

    我想不出任何其他种族会支持自己的自杀。

    同意。 开始反抗或不复存在。 选一个,小白。

    • 回复: @Kolya Krassotkin
  138. @Patrick McNally

    “实际上,在一年后的 1949 年版中,《世界年鉴》现在给出了 11 万这个数字,作为他们从《美国犹太人年鉴》中得出的战后估计。 当然,考虑到战后时代的混乱状况,这 11 万个数字很容易被低估。 '

    我想知道大屠杀的否认是什么时候开始流行的? 如果不是到 1948 年,《世界年鉴》就没有理由澄清其数据的基础。 无论如何,声称波兰等国拥有与 1939 年一样多的犹太人显然是愚蠢的。 犹太人显然已经不在了。

    如果大屠杀 有没有 发生了,应该有可能在其他地方显示德系犹太人数量的激增,这与整个欧洲的明显下降相对应。 我怀疑这是否可以做到——有很好的理由。

    另一方面,依靠 1949 年数字的“美国犹太人年鉴”并不能真正让我们有所收获。 假设犹太人 民政事务总署 制造大屠杀,美国犹太人年鉴将是他们插入必要数字的第一个地方。

    • 回复: @Ron Unz
    , @Patrick McNally
  139. Iva 说:

    为什么要担心旧的大屠杀?????? 我们应该担心我们现在正在经历的大屠杀。

  140. saggy 说: • 您的网站
    @Iva

    我读到俄罗斯解放营拿走了所有文件,据他们说,在所有营地中,有 233,000 人死亡。 我想知道为什么俄罗斯不释放他们?

    The documents were released following glasnost. You can get a copy of the Auschwitz ‘death book’ on Amazon …

    查看有关的帖子 imgur.com

    You can read about them here … http://www.holohoax101.org

  141. Ron Unz 说:
    @Colin Wright

    我想知道大屠杀的否认是什么时候开始流行的? 如果不是到 1948 年,《世界年鉴》就没有理由澄清其数据的基础。

    实际上,据我所知,在二战后到 1950 年代,美国很少有人“相信大屠杀”。 这是我 2018 年否认大屠杀的文章中的一段扩展:

    然而,随着我开始进一步调查大屠杀否认的历史, 原因 逆境中,我很惊讶地发现,这种在大屠杀中普遍存在的难以置信的模式似乎一直没有减弱 after 战争结束和整个1950年代,在美国高级军事人物中,尤其是在具有情报背景的高级将领和个人看来,他们尤其强大,他们似乎对真实事件拥有最全面的了解。

    几年前,我偶然发现了一本完全晦涩难懂的1951年著作, 美国的铁幕 由著名的大学教授约翰·比蒂(John Beaty)撰写。 Beaty在战时时期曾在军事情报部门工作过,负责编写分发给所有美国高级官员的每日简报报告,汇总了过去24小时内获得的情报信息,这显然是一个相当重要的职位。

    作为一个热心的反共主义者,他认为美国大部分犹太人口与颠覆活动息息相关,因此对美国传统自由构成了严重威胁。 尤其是,犹太人对出版业和媒体日益增长的束缚,使得不一致的观点越来越难以传播到美国人民手中,这种审查制度构成了他标题中描述的“铁幕”。 他指责犹太人的利益与希特勒的德国完全不必要的战争,后者一直在寻求与美国的良好关系,但由于其强烈反对欧洲犹太人支持的共产主义威胁而遭受了彻底的破坏。

    比蒂还尖锐地谴责了美国对以色列新州的支持,这有可能使我们损失了成千上万穆斯林和阿拉伯人的善意。 而且,作为一个非常小的人,他还批评以色列人继续声称希特勒杀害了XNUMX万犹太人,这是一个非常难以置信的指控,没有明显的根据,实际上只是犹太人和共产主义者炮制的欺诈行为,目的是毒害了我们与战后德国的关系,并从长期饱受苦难的德国人民手中为犹太国家牟利。

    此外,他严厉批评纽伦堡审判,称其为美国“不可磨灭的重大污点”和“对正义的嘲弄”。 据他说,诉讼主要由报复心强的德国犹太人主导,其中许多人从事伪造证词,甚至有犯罪背景。 结果,这场“惨败”只是让德国人明白“我们的政府没有正义感”。 战后不久的共和党领袖罗伯特·塔夫脱(Robert Taft)采取了非常相似的立场,后来他赢得了约翰·肯尼迪(John F. Kennedy)的赞誉。 勇气中的个人资料。 纽伦堡的苏联首席检察官在 1930 年代后期臭名昭著的斯大林主义表演审判中扮演了同样的角色,在此期间,许多老布尔什维克承认了各种荒谬可笑的事情,这一事​​实几乎没有提高诉讼程序对许多外界的可信度。观察者。

    到现在为止,拥有如此有争议立场的书几乎没有机会找到纽约的主流出版商,但很快由一家达拉斯的小公司发行,然后大获成功,在接下来的几年中进行了约十七次印刷。 据斯科特·麦康奈尔(Scott McConnell)称, 美国保守党 比蒂的书成为 1950 年代第二受欢迎的保守文本,仅次于罗素柯克的标志性经典, 保守思想。

    此外,尽管包括 ADL 在内的犹太团体严厉谴责了这本书,特别是在他们的私人游说中,但这些努力引起了强烈反对,许多在职和退休的美国高级将领全心全意地支持比蒂的工作,谴责 ADL 审查的努力,并敦促所有美国人读卷。 尽管比蒂相当明确的否认大屠杀可能会震惊现代人的温柔情感,但在当时它似乎几乎没有引起一丝担忧,甚至几乎完全被犹太人对这部作品的直言不讳的批评所忽视。

    https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-holocaust-denial/#explicit-and-implicit-holocaust-denial-after-world-war-ii

    这是我另一篇非常相关的文章的链接:

    https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-secrets-of-military-intelligence/

  142. R.C. 说:

    做得好! 我不知道这一切,但并不感到惊讶。
    两个公认的小点:

    他们在奥斯威辛集中营、马伊达内克和达豪向游客展示的那些所谓的毒气室是战后重建的。

    将它们标记为战后建筑,一旦被捕获,将其标记为重建会更正确。
    和;
    我认为您不需要在“百万”之后使用(原文如此),因为那是当时的正常用法。
    做得好!
    RC

  143. zimriel 说:
    @Verymuchalive

    The intro to the offending sentence, “for the majority of this time”, is what makes this a howler.
    来吧,道尔顿; 你比这更好。

  144. @Priss Factor

    The German people were fighting against the very same Bolsheviks we are dealing with TODAY.

    War is an ugly thing, to be sure. At least fifty five MILLION people died in WWII, but all we hear about is sixmillionjews.

    I bet you could ask one hundred people how many people perished in WWII and none of them could tell you…..but they would ALL know about the “gassing of six million jews.”

    I do not give a fuck what Philip the Dick says.

    The German people had every right to fight for their country and so do we.

  145. perhaps off-topic, but this is too funny.

    [更多]

    Just listened to this —

    Three self-described “loud-mouthed Jewish lesbian(s)” gloated over the \$26million judgement they strong-armed out of a superannuated judge and jury in Charlottesville.

    That’s not the funny part.
    On the whole it was deeply distressing, even more when one notes, as was emphasized in this gloat-a-thon, that the same legal strategy — to allege a “racially motivated conspiracy to commit violence” on the basis of an 1871 law — will form the basis for the 1/6 trials.

    Much more to say about this event that the Jews promise will “have far reaching implications” — specifically, chilling free speech — but I need a long shower before studying the transcript further.

    HOWEVER, in my first perusal of the transcript I noticed that as moderator Larry ?? Weinstein?? introduced the three femalishes, the name of the

    “executive director of integrity for America the organization that has been on the front lines of the battle to keep democracy and fight extremist summit underwrote this lawsuit.”

    appears on the transcript as
    Amy Satanic.

    嘻嘻

    paging EMJones: the cunning of reason.

    • 回复: @Sepp
  146. Maddaugh 说:

    This was, we are told, a deliberate policy of Hitler and his top men, something of highest priority—even above the war effort itself—and a policy of the utmost secrecy. It was so secret, in fact, that hard documentation and forensic evidence on this catastrophic, world-changing event are almost nonexistent:

    No evidence exists because all the documents were torched just like the 6 million. As the war ground to an end and the Germans ran out of combustibles, they used the documents to fuel the furnaces. Its always better when there is no evidence. Everything was reduced to ashes which blew away…check out the documentary Swindler’s Twist.

    The Germans were so efficient that neither ashes from the documents nor the bodies of the 6 million were ever found.

    This is the truth, just check out the archives of any Holocaust Museum or even ask Stevie Schpellburg !

    • 哈哈: Kolya Krassotkin
  147. @Priss Factor

    普利斯,你使用了很多概括性。

    纳粹邪恶的事实。 . . .他们所做(并试图做)的一些事情确实超越了苍白,

    什么东西? 名三。 请明确点。

    这并不是说纳粹是好的或其他的

    为什么不? 为什么不说,“纳粹是好人之类的”? 纳粹只做“不好”的事情吗? 那些东西是什么?

    这并不是要在所有群体都受到同样指责的情况下推动道德对等。

    在某些方面,纳粹确实是极端的。

    再次,请举三个例子,非常具体。

    但他们的残暴和不人道的行为相当“普遍”,或者在其他民族中司空见惯。

    同上。 事实,女士,不是标签和断言。

    所以,虽然有些纳粹 邪恶是独一无二的 在现代,他们的残暴行为与其他人的所作所为相似。

    如果纳粹邪恶是“独特的”,那么命名、描述、时间和放置这种“独特的邪恶”应该很容易。
    否则折叠。

    此外,其他人所做的一些事情与大屠杀非常接近。

    这种普遍性是一个稍微不同的类别。
    “离大屠杀很近。” 你的意思是说,“其他人”已经花了 100 多年的时间来诽谤无辜的人民,谎报他们没有犯下的罪行,每时每刻都在追捕他们?

    这就是你所说的“其他人已经接近大屠杀”的意思吗?

    但德国人没有这样做。
    据我所知,也不是伊朗人。

    另一方面,正如我之前简要评论的那样,四个犹太人只花了一个小时幸灾乐祸,他们如何有效地破坏了几名美国人的生活,罪名是“拿着提基火炬游行”和“阅读我的奋斗”并说“犹太人”不会取代我们”,这与说“停止偷窃”是一样的——也许更糟。

    总之——具体细节,普利斯。 或者把你的句柄换成凯伦:你的 900 字相当于美德信号。

    • 同意: Mulegino1
    • 回复: @Sepp
    , @Mulegino1
    , @Carolyn Yeager
  148. @smaragdus

    Putin is a Crypto Jew. No doubt.

    His mother’s name is Maria Ivanovna Shalomovitch.

    Last time I heard, Shalomovitch is not Russian.

    Putin’s daughter is married to Kirill Shamalov. Another Jew.

    https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/russia-capitalism-shamalov/

    • 回复: @Sepp
  149. Luus Kanin 说:
    @Truth Vigilante

    Careful Truth Vigilante, you almost formed one of those okay hand gestures there, which would have automatically set in motion a full throated cry of of Raaaayycissss from the Ranting Dispossession League.

  150. Sepp 说:
    @SolontoCroesus

    让我们面对现实吧,纽伦堡从未结束。 我们现在都是亚玛力人。

    • 回复: @Psychotic Break
    , @Bookish1
  151. Sepp 说:
    @SolontoCroesus

    My reaction when I read that comment was that someone must have hijacked his handle. For one thing the comment was devoid of whit, which PF usually provides in spades. Perhaps it was his wife “Karen”…

  152. Sepp 说:
    @Crypto Jew

    I agree that people don’t put enough weight on daughters marrying Jews to be evidence that the father, or mother, were Jewish.

    All of Biden’s children married Jews, and Ivanka Trump, the Chabbaz Lubbowitzer, too. Who else besides a Jew could possibly marry that beta soy boy Jared Kushner?

    Jews are clearly histories oldest eugenicists. The pressure to marry within the tribe works on both sides of the marriage, both the husband’s and wife’s family will prefer a Jewish spouse.

    当然,当我们到达阶梯的顶端时,犹太人的近亲繁殖也成为一个因素。 所有这些超级富裕的犹太家庭都是高度近亲繁殖的,众所周知,罗斯柴尔德家族几代人都只与表亲结婚。 因此,这也表明了部落成员身份。

    最后,犹太人还以使用婚姻作为控制手段而闻名。 当一个关键的傀儡或傀儡成为家庭的一部分时,部落的影响力就会大大增加。

    Stalin would be a case in point. Even if he wasn’t a C-Jew, the fact that all his wives and chosen mates likely shows not only some kind of innate, or genetic, in group preference, but also a willingness and preparedness to marry within the ruling caste.

    因此,我认为基于在部落内结婚的孩子,某人成为 C-Jew 的概率接近 50%。

    • 回复: @Al Liguori
  153. @Patrick McNally

    重点是,

    “6 million” was a Zionist goal-seek (more dead diaspora Jews = more grease for the skids of the Israel-in-Palestine Project) during and after both rounds of the 20th Century World War.

    come 1945 and for years thereafter, no one knew even a ballpark figure for the number of Jews who perished during Round II. So the Zionists naturally settled on 6 million, and their puppet media have since reified that number by repeating it 6 trillion times. Haxo reads the Einsatzgruppen and related Eastern Front SS and Police documents as adding up to c. 1,000,000 Jews killed; and Nazi and other documents relating to Belzec, Sobibor, Treblinka, and Auschwitz-Birkenau as adding up to another c. 2,000,000. 2+1 = 3. Not 6.

    as to the absolute “Holocaust Denialist” scammers: by denying the obvious, they have played right into the Hands of the Zionists.

    • 回复: @Anonymous
  154. Sepp 说:
    @Patrick McNally

    Once again, the lying hasbara troll doesn’t back up his assertions with anything but blather, and it doesn’t add anything to the discussion.

    [更多]

    The World Almanac series of books sometimes provided two sets of figures for the world Jewish population. One came from the AJC (American Jewish Committee), and the other is the World Almanac’s own estimation.

    1933 年:15,316,359 (AJC),第 419 页
    1934 : ???
    1935 : ???
    1936 年:15,753,633,第 748 页
    1937 : ???
    1938 年:15,748,091 (AJC),第 510 页
    1939 年:使用 1938 年的数据
    1940 年:15,290,983 (AJC),第 519 页; 15,319,359(年鉴),第 129 页
    1941 年:使用 1938 年的数据
    1942 年:15,192,089,第 849 页
    1943 年:使用 1942 年的数据
    1944 年:使用 1942 年的数据
    1945 : 15,688,259 (AJC), page 494; 15,xxx,xxx (Almanac), page xxx
    1946 : uses 1945 data (AJC), page 488; 15,xxx,xxx (Almanac), page xxx
    1947 : uses 1945 data (AJC), page 219; 15,690,000 (Almanac), page 748
    1948 : uses 1945 data (AJC), page 249; 15,753,638 (Almanac), page 849
    1949 : n/a (AJC); 15,713,638 (Almanac), page 289
    1950 : n/a (AJC); n/a (Almanac)

    In 1949, the AJC didn’t provide an estimation for that year, instead, they revised the number of Jews for 1939 and 1947:

    1949 AJC revision for 1939 : 16,643,120, page 204
    1949 AJC revision for 1947 : 11,266,600, page 204

    After 1949, the World Almanac discontinued providing their own estimations, instead, they only reported the numbers given by AJC. In 1950, the AJC didn’t provide an estimation for that year, instead, they revised the number of Jews for 1948:

    1950 AJC revision for 1948 : 11,373,000, page 473

    So, let’s brief this quickly. The last available pre-war number comes from 1938. In 1940, they somehow got a new estimation. In 1941, they use the 1938 number, not the 1940 number. In 1942, they got a new estimation, which was then used in both the 1943 and 1944 versions, until the war ended and they made a new estimation for 1945, which was then used for 1946, 1947 and 1948. In 1949, the Almanac made an estimation of their own, whereas the AJC decided to revise the 1947 number instead.

    15,688,259-11,266,600 = 4,421,659

    Hmm, 4,4 million missing Jews. No, that can’t be right. We all knew 6 million died before the Nuremberg Trials began anyway. So what to do? Well, the AJC had a great idea! They revised the 1939 number by adding 1 million Jews.

    895,029 to be precise. So:

    4,421,659 + 895,029 5,316,688

    Bingo. The official Holocaust story goes that somewhere from 5,4 to 6 million Jews died. The number was predetermined and the AJC played along. Somehow they knew, 10 years later in 1949, that the 1938 and 1939 numbers were wrong. No mention of their source, no mention of their methodology used. They just changed the number. Poof.
    Historians will tell you the added one million Jews comes from the Wannsee Conference, where the Nazis counted 11,000,000 Jews in Europe, but it is known that this number was exaggerated by roughly two million, therefore their point is moot. The additional one million are imaginary Jews, added for the sole purpose of having more Jews killed on paper. This is one of the essential bits of the lie that six million Jews died, but as we can, it couldn’t possibly be six million, but 4,4 million maximum.

    Now, this doesn’t mean 4,4 million Jews died, because they didn’t, it’s just that most Jews after the war spread all over the world, took gentile names and became crypto-Jews. What’s more, the AJC stopped reporting the actual number of Jews for current years, instead, they reported for two years back. Starting with 1949 when they “revised” the 1947 number, then in 1950 when they “revised” the 1948 number. They just kept “revising” the number of Jews two years back, ignoring the actual numbers. I wonder why?

    这里有一些有趣的事情:

    The 1933 World Almanac lists 682,400,000 Christians. The 1949 World Almanac lists 592,406,542 Christians. That’s 89,993,458 less.

    The Handbook of Council of Churches in the USA from 1951 lists 15,300,000 Jews.

    This comment lays out what is clear to all. Jews routinely edit history in order to support their current narrative. Call it historical Tikkun Olam. Douchebag Patrick McNally is an active participant in this historical coverup.

  155. @Priss Factor

    I agree with the bulk of what you’ve written but would like to draw your attention to one item.

    你写了:

    考虑。 如果日本不同意无条件投降,美国计划再向日本投下 10 或 12 颗原子弹。

    1945 年初,日本人知道战争已经失败,尤其是在东京等城市遭到燃烧弹轰炸之后(一天内死亡的人数比原子弹袭击中的死亡人数还多),日本人急于投降。

    利用中间体,谈判是这样的:

    [更多]

    美国代表团:我们要求无条件投降。

    Japanese Delegation: Yes, we are ready to surrender at once. We agree to any conditions that you might stipulate – except for one.
    我们恭请天皇免于战争罪起诉。
    这是我们唯一的规定。

    几个月过去了,双方不必要地失去了更多的生命(比如硫磺岛战役和其他地方)。 于是,代表团再次开会。

    美国代表团:你现在准备好投降了吗?

    日本代表团:是的,是的,我们现在准备投降。 我们只要求天皇免于受到战争罪起诉的侮辱。

    美国代表团:没有。 我们只接受无条件投降。

    所以战争继续,更多的生命被无目的地牺牲,例如冲绳之战,新几内亚/菲律宾/荷属东印度群岛等。

    之后,代表团再次会面,并再次进行了同样的交流。

    因此,原子弹被投放到广岛和长崎,投降谈判重新开始:

    美国代表团:当然,现在你必须愿意投降,否则我们会一直用核武器攻击你,直到你投降?

    日本代表团:我们当然希望投降。 然而,我们只要求天皇免于战争罪的起诉。

    U.S Delegation (realising that, unlike them, the Japanese are an honourable people who would never abandon their Emperor): Okie Dokie – we accept your stipulation and a surrender was negotiated.

    底线:日本人在 XNUMX 月初签署了对密苏里号航空母舰的有条件投降协议,太平洋战争告一段落。

    战争的最后 6 到 8 个月,以及数十万人被浪费的生命,都是徒劳的。

    美国一直打算将原子弹用于演示目的。 即:向苏联人展示他们拥有的武器库,以便苏联人尊重在分配的势力范围内划定的商定路线,因为欧洲在胜利​​者之间瓜分。

    这使得美国无需在西欧维持一支庞大的军队的永久存在,以应对任何感知到的苏联领土扩张。

    当然,美国本可以在太平洋某个无人居住的环礁上,在苏联代表团面前展示原子弹,但这永远做不到。

    二战期间负责美国外交政策的犹太复国主义者完全打算用核武器袭击德国平民,但在原子弹投入使用之前,他们就面临着德国的投降。

    Unperturbed, and wanting to satiate their desire for mass incineration of the goyim, they gave Harry Truman his marching orders to nuke Japan and made sure they’d get to see that spectacle they so dearly craved.

    • 同意: John Wear
    • 回复: @Towey
  156. @Ron Unz

    It was 1976 when a respectable Jewish lawyer corrected me when I said that I had read that the number of Jews murdered might have been “only” 4 million. It mattered to me neither to believe or disbelieve and it is only reading and listening over the last 20 years, not least UR but also a surprising ABC RN Saturday Extra broadcast where the figures 4.5 to 6 million were given without objection, that have convinced me that the figure of 6 million is fanciful, if not dishonest. [The Chronicle of Higher Education had a recent article by Tom Bartlett about one Mackenzie Fierceton – neé Morrison – that helps one understand exaggerations which may be self interested but not fundamentally dishonest]. So this article is less than fascinating for me on that issue.

    我的猜测是,Yad Vashem 的 4.5 万个名字包括大量重复和幸存者的名字,但 4 万个为 6 万个仪式所表达的恐怖提供了足够的空间。

    In the course of niscellaneous speculation it occurred to me that the persecution of the 6 million already screamed about by 1920 led to remarkably little Jewish immigration to Palestine till the 1930s.indeed in the two years 1927-28 there was net emigration. I’m not sure what might be made of that. Perhaps the British limiting the numbers and European prosperity, and even Jewish privilege in the Soviet Union might be part of it.

    As to the scepticism of American military men about the Holocaust I wonder if you have given enough weight to the fact that they wouldn’t have had anything to do with, or even seen the remnants of the camps in Poland. What is more they would have been conscious of a lot of beat up in the way film of Dachau and Bergen-Belsen were used. Exactly the way to rile them, especially if they also didn’t like the way some Jews contributed to what happened at the War Crimes Trials.

    • 回复: @Ron Unz
  157. @Colin Wright

    Taking some things in the opposite order, it is clear that any attempt to assess world Jewish population at any time in the last century will involve the American Jewish Yearbook. Some have referenced The World Almanac as if it has its own separate set of researchers who compile demographic data independently. It does not have such. The editors of The World Almanac simply gather data from other sources and republish it. Any methodical look at The World Almanac will make it clear that the American Jewish Yearbook is one of their primary sources, probably the primary source, for issues of Jewish population. The main difference is that The World Almanac is not under the obligation to update everything in exact synchronization with the AJYB. If the AJYB has published older numbers at one time and now produces modified data, then The World Almanac may sometimes be slower in adopting the change. But they usually do go with the AJYB, so it’s pointless to try to evade the latter as a principal reference source.

    [更多]

    Now with regards to what the AJYB has published and when, the record there is more complicated than one might assume. In Volume 41, page 583, the world estimate given is 16,180,000. A year later in Volume 42, page 592, the new estimate given is 15,757,000. There’s no indication that this drop of 343,000 is specifically attributed to either massacres or war-casualties. It seems to just be a different estimate arrived at from different presumptions. To complicate things further, on the next page of Volume 42 one finds the statement “Of the total number 15,748,000 Jews in the world…” It’s not clear what accounts for the difference of 9,000 between the 2 pages.

    To add more to the mix, in 1940 Arthur Ruppin published The Jewish Fate and Future where on page 29 he gives an estimate for the 1938 world Jewish population of 16.7 million. The World Almanac of 1948 cites a 1939 estimate by the American Jewish Committee of 15,688,259. The latter is consistent with the numbers generally put out by the AJYB during this time. But Ruppin’s figure is obviously of a different order. But since WWII it has become a standard reference, adopted by the AJYB, World Almanac and most everyone else.

    Is it possible that Ruppin is correct that there were serious underestimates in the world Jewish population made before WWII? The only really feasible place where one could make such claims would be the USSR. Outside of eastern Europe, most Jews in the 19th century had enjoyed a period of tolerance which discouraged crypto-Judaism and led to many of them being very open about any their genealogy. Within Russia things were different enough that Ruppin might have a valid claim about earlier estimates having been too low.

    Unfortunately, one thing which corrupts a lot of efforts to get this matter straight are attempts at double-counting which seem to have appeared in the later 20th century. You may have occasionally heard stories about how it has been discovered that “7 million” Jews really died in this era. Alan Bullock groups together a bunch of citations of such claims in Hitler and Stalin: Parallel Lives. Citing Krausnick & Wilhelm as a source, Bullock on page 989 gives an upper estimate on Jewish deaths of 6,921,000. He also gives a lower estimate of 5,636,000, while for both estimates asserting a 1945 world Jewish population of 11 million. Bullock claims that Krausnick & Wilhelm have revised earlier estimates of Jewish casualties in the USSR from 700,000 to 2.2 million.

    Now Gerald Reitlinger in The Final Solution, page 501, 1953 edition, had given estimates of Jewish casualties as running from a low of 4,194,200 to a high of 4,581,000, with estimates for the USSR running between 700,000 to 750,000. Raul Hilberg in The Destruction of the European Jews, Volume 3, page 1321, 2003 edition, gives a global loss estimate of 5.1 million with more than 700,000 assigned to the USSR. Even if one grants that Reitlinger and Hilberg may have been working off of underestimates, it seems inexplicable that no one has ever gotten around to upgrading Ruppin’s claim of 16.7 million to something like 17.7 million, if what Krausnick & Wilhelm claim is true. What seems more likely is that the latter have somewhere double-counted things. Most Holocaust-publicists might realize that it doesn’t help to try claiming that the 1939 world Jewish population was high enough for the 6,921,000 figure which Bullock cites to be true. But at the same time, they prefer not to openly challenge the latter.

    In any event, one is forced to start working from a range of 1939 estimates which can run from a low of 15.7 million to a high of 16.7 million. Then the issue is, should one buy the 11 million total for 1945? According to the AIYB of 1951, Volume 52, the world Jewish population had reached 11,490,680. That might seem a bit high as the state of Israel was only founded in 1948 and Jewish birth rates everywhere else were generally low. In the 2004 volume the AJYB on page 500 produces some revised estimates where they say that their original estimate for January 1, 1950, had been 11,303,400 but their new revised estimate is 11,297,000. That seems odd in regards to the 11,490,680 estimate given in the 1951 AJYB, especially since the data published in 1951 is more likely to be from the end of 1950. It’s not clear whether that 11,303,400 figure might itself be a revision of the earlier 11,490,680 or whether they believed that there was a really sharp increase in 1950 alone.

    But the revisions made in the 2004 edition go beyond that. The 2004 edition on page 500 cites an older estimate which they date to January 1, 1980, of 14,527,100 and they assert instead a revised of 12,819,000. That represents a change of 1.708 million in the downward direction. One thing may surely bother a reader is the way there is an obvious willingness to adopt higher estimates for the pre-WWII figures, but then retroactively shift to lower estimates for 1980 and thereafter even when it means altering their own earlier published figures. The AJYB of 1981, Volume 81, page 285, gives a world Jewish population of 14,527,150. But now this is to be retconned as 12,819,000.

    Related to this is the matter of how many people exist who may be counted as “half-Jews” and “quarter-Jews” and such. In the American Jewish Year Book 2015 there is a description of world Jewish population which speaks of Core Jewish population, Population with Jewish parents, Enlarged Jewish population, and Law of Return population. The Law of Return population includes children, grandchildren and spouses of Jews regardless of their identification. The Enlarged Jewish population appears to discount grandchildren but include non-Jewish spouses. The figures given as world totals for January 1, 2015, on page 346 are 14,310,500 for the Core population, 17,411,450 for the population with Jewish parents, 20,235,700 for the Enlarged population, and 23,047,900 for the Law of Return population. If one tries to deduce grandchildren from the Enlarged and Law of Return populations one gets 2,812,200 which if added to the population with Jewish parents would suggest 20,223,650 as a world estimate of people who are either Core Jewish or else have parents or grandparents that are such.

    This now brings up the issue of trying to figure out what the inter-breeding birth rates are. We’ve seen from Ivanka Trump that it is possible for a woman of Gentile background to marry a Jewish spouse and produce 3 children. But that seems to be more of an exception. Anyway, that 20,223,650 is what should somewhere contain the difference between the 14,527,150 and the 12,819,000 estimates. The issue here is over what was the true world Jewish population in the summer of 1945. As far as I can tell, it’s difficult to be certain of anything because of the way that apparently large numbers of Jews have mated outside of the Jewish group since 1945. If it was normal to have birth rates when an Orthodox Jew marries a Roman Catholic then this might account for the difference between 11 million and 20,223,650.

    But that doesn’t seem likely and so it’s easy to hypothesize, without being able to prove much, that maybe the 11 million is some kind of an underestimate. If it were, it would be first of all the result of difficulties in gathering data in the immediate aftermath of WWII. With huge numbers of Jews having been deported into the USSR, some significant fraction dying there (not necessarily at the level claimed in orthodox Holocaust history), and then subsequent attempts by Jews to resettle after the war, you can expect a lot of quiet moving about where people don’t identify their genealogy until much later. By the time people were settled enough to start coming out there may also have been enough inter-breeding to make it difficult to accurately gauge the starting population.

    It seems like any hard-core Jews who were alive in 1980 will be included within the 12,819,000 total. That would place the remainder of the 14,527,150 which was once supposed to have existed outside of such a hard-core group. Is this extra 1,708,150 just statistical error which the AJYB made in 1981? If not, then it seems unlikely that such a number would be the result of high birth rates after 1945. More likely it would reflect some portion of Jews who were alive in 1945 but not counted within the 11 million. From the 20,223,650 number it’s easy to imagine that 14.5 million Jews might have been alive in the summer of 1945, although it’s pointless to claim to have proven such. The 14,310,500 given in the 2015 volume will naturally include the population of Israel and so added numbers in the 20,223,650 will not arise from there. It’s a question of whether or not the growth rates, with all inter-breeding included, are high enough to account for what is given. I can’t actually prove that they are or are not, but it seems reasonable for someone to have doubts about that 11 million number assigned to 1945.

    • 谢谢: Colin Wright
    • 回复: @Sepp
  158. @mocissepvis

    Allowing them to leave, or forcing them to leave, is not a solution. Netanyahu would love it, but… They would impose themselves on others, genocidally in the case of Palestine, and in time they’d be back.

    Don’t impose your Jews on others. Place restrictions on them such that increasing numbers solve the problem by ceasing to be Jews. In time there will be none.

  159. Ron Unz 说:
    @Wizard of Oz

    至于美国军人对大屠杀的怀疑,我想知道你是否足够重视这样一个事实,即他们不会有任何关系,甚至不会看到波兰集中营的残余物。 更重要的是,他们会意识到在使用 Dachau 和 Bergen-Belsen 的电影的方式上有很多挫败感。 正是激怒他们的方式,特别是如果他们也不喜欢一些犹太人为战争罪审判中发生的事情做出贡献的方式。

    你太傻了。 看看我的两篇文章:

    https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-holocaust-denial/

    https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-secrets-of-military-intelligence/

    根据现有证据,在二战后的几年里,几乎没有消息灵通的人相信“犹太人大屠杀”,当它被公开嘲笑为荒谬的战争宣传时,也没有像 ADL 这样的犹太激进组织为其辩护。 丘吉尔、艾森豪威尔和戴高乐的数千页个人回忆录从未提及此事,因为他们不想让未来的历史学家嘲笑他们。

    大屠杀直到几年后才被发明出来,直到好莱坞在 1970 年代开始制作有关它的电影和电视节目时才被广泛相信。

    你面临的困难是你现在是一个老年人,很难承认你一生中大部分时间都相信荒谬的废话。 在 1991 年,老苏联的很多人肯定也遇到过类似的问题。

  160. Height_776 说:

    The results of the First World War culminated in the collapse of three empires (Russian, Austro-Hungarian and Ottoman) and the formation of Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic(the Bolshevik communists leadership of Vladimir Lenin and Leon Trotsky(Bronstein) , Hungarian Soviet Republic(The head of government was Sandor Garbai, but the influence of the foreign minister Bela Kun (Bela Kohn)from the Hungarian Communist Party was much stronger…), the Republic of Turkey(Mustafa Kemal Pasha + The Dönmeh).
    Power from the aristocracy of the empiries passed into the hands of leaders with Jewish roots, not for a long time.

  161. HeebHunter 说:
    @Rex.Reptilius

    The audacity of this kike. It is even named king reptile.

    The Holohoax didnt happen, but it should have, and it will happen. Thank you for listing the freemasons alongside the kikes, same for commies and other subversive cretins.

  162. @Ned kelly

    One of the worst things a Jew can do is learn from the experts: here are their fake names: Bill Browder, Madoff, Dov Zakheim, the Pollard, Eli Weasel, Leo Frank, Lucky Larry Silverstein, Robert Maxwell, Genrikh Yagoda, and all the “israeli” terrorists. Supporting the murder-robbery of Palestine is another “worst thing”.

    https://nationalvanguard.org/2019/08/the-greatest-mass-murderers-of-all-time-were-jews-says-jewish-columnist/

  163. Petermx 说:
    @Ron Unz

    Very interesting. Norman Finkelstein points to the Israeli victory in the 1967 war as the date the Holocaust narrative began. Jews were more confident and had the power to broadcast it to the rest of the country. I was a child growing up in the 1960’s so I don’t know if I would have known about this, but I don’t recall any discussion about a holocaust/genocide and I have heard there was little discussion of the “genocide” of the Jews but I did not know how little. Your comment is remarkable but it makes sense. Viewed from today, the fact that “thousands of pages of personal memoirs by Churchill, Eisenhower, and De Gaulle never mentioned a word about it” would be astonishing unless what you wrote is true.

    A lot of people believe in ridiculous nonsense. In one of David Irving’s speeches he discusses a discussion he had with his German (and perhaps Jewish) publisher where his publisher says “everyone knew what was going on” (meaning, during the war in regards to Jews) and David Irving responds something like “no”, “you’ve convinced yourself in the intervening years this is so”. I think David Irving says people take what has been discussed long after the war was over and apply it to the war years as if it was real.

    I rarely discuss politics with my older brother but we talk about other things. We almost had a falling out when I said I do not believe the Germans were more evil than others and I don’t believe in the “Holocaust”. I sent him some material and he didn’t respond. I knew he was upset. He’s a little older than me and he was born in 1950. I remember the years in the late 1960’s, growing up, sitting in the backyard with my brother and his girlfriend and there was never any discussion about the “Holocaust”. Only a few years later, in the mid 1970’s the Holocaust was everywhere, in the news, on TV, magazines, newspapers – everywhere and everyday. I would like to have my brother recall those years and point out to him that he only became convinced of the “Holocaust” after his teens and this is a result of stories told long after the war ended but I think he would get upset and would not want to listen.

  164. @Sepp

    Exactly! Well said. Very astute observation and conclusion!

  165. Anonymous[284]• 免责声明 说:
    @Haxo Angmark

    Sort of. The actual number is in the 2-2.5M range, see the excellent analysis here by occasional commenter j2:

    http://www.pienisalaliittotutkimus.com/2021/04/29/revised-holocaust-calculations/

    The number 6 has some kind of Kabbalistic significance, originally it was claimed there were 15.5M Jews pre-war, they then claimed (without justification) it was 16.7, and viola, 16.7-11 is close to 6.

    Ultimately this comes down to Soviet claims about the number of Jews under their control, and you simply cannot believe anything they said. There appears to be 1M fewer Jews pre-war than claimed, and 1M more post-war, giving a death toll of 2.5M, which is consistent with believable German documentation.

    There is no doubt some revisionists are disinformation agents, but your claim of 1M EG shootings is absurd, the actual number was probably in the 100K range. And while it’s also probably true that most of the 1.2M Jews sent through the AR camps died somewhere in the SU, the official accounts of what happened at places like Treblinka are laughably absurd.

    • 回复: @Trinity
  166. Trinity 说:
    @Anonymous

    (((The Jews))) must adore the number 666 then.

  167. Yukon Jack 说:

    This article and comments are outstanding. In my mind do the Jews need another holoroasting for what they are doing to us now. This entire Covid-19 hoax and death jab is obviously organized by them, as the Jew owned MSM is completely in on it and so are the Jew owned pharma corporations, and the Jew whore politicians – and even the white savior Trump who still shills the vaxx.

    Certainly, the current genocide by the needle and injection is cause enough to prosecute Jews like Hitler did. Hitler isolated Jews from the volk, and it is logical and moral to do that again, at least as a minimal step back toward a sane society. I would argue elimination for all Jews involved in social media banning, anti-Russia propaganda, etc. I believe CNN and ADL Jews are waging a real war against us and need to be treated as war criminals, military arrests and executions.

    How many people actually know we are not just in an epic ‘everything’ bubble, but the biggest pump and dump scam ever? The Fed lowered interest rates to zero, and injected trillions of liquidity with bond purchases, this has caused the biggest runup of equities and now even real estate. Money is seeking a home somewhere where the gain is above the inflation rate. Since regular bank savings interest is almost at zero percent, money has gone into the stock market, and this has fueled even more speculation with margin buying which is now near 1 trillion USD. Thus the Fed has caused the biggest speculative stock bubble of all time. This bubble spread to real estate, which is now higher than the 2006 peak.

    Thus if the pull the rug out now, by aggresively raising rates to fight inflation, the world markets would implode in the most epic bust of all time, and it would further their cause of consolidating wealth in the hands of a few insiders who know the game. It would be the biggest fleecing of the lambs (robin hood traders and newbies).

    If the bubble pops and the world economy is put into another death spiral, aka the ‘great reset’, will white people be able to organize themselves into a Jew fighting force? Or are white people so cucked to Jewish Biblical propaganda that they will defend the Jews as the chosen ones forever, until Jesus returns (never). I have argued that Hitler was the last valiant attempt to defeat world Jewry and now we are done for, we are so brainwashed we have no chance.

    • 回复: @Katrinka
    , @Pierre Simon
  168. Sepp 说:
    @Patrick McNally

    “I can’t actually prove that they are or are not, but it seems reasonable for someone to have doubts about that 11 million number assigned to 1945.”

    After 3 unsubstantiated and useless fact check comments we finally get some meat. In that end it just a bunch of blather about how imprecise the counts of Jews and mixed Jews are, while ignoring the millions of C-jews. Then, in the end, you tacitly admit that the 11 million number is bullshit and that the Jews must have exerted political pressure to get the World Almanac to retroactively reduce the numbers to fit their political agenda. Just as I wrote in my comment above, and just what we would expect from an ankle biting fact checker extraordinaire.

    The main take away here is that there is absolutely no proof of the 6 million, any more than there was any proof of the dozen or more claims of 6 million holocausts in the centuries leading up to the ultimate fake.

    • 同意: Robjil
  169. @Ron Unz

    Yeah, I think I’ll take the first-hand accounts of such brilliant and empathetic individuals as Victor Frankl and Primo Levi over your bizarre concoctions.

  170. John Wear 说:
    @Triteleia Laxa

    关于维克多·弗兰克尔,他的著作《人类寻找意义》被美国国会图书馆评为 20 世纪美国最具影响力的 10 本书之一。 弗兰克尔在这本书中描述了他在奥斯威辛集中营的经历,就好像他在那里度过了好几个月一样。 实际上,1944 年 XNUMX 月,弗兰克尔在从特莱西恩施塔特前往达豪分营的途中仅在奥斯威辛集中营呆了几天。

    弗兰克尔向美国传教士罗伯特舒勒承认了这一点:“我在奥斯威辛集中营只呆了三四天……我被送到了一个兵营,我们都被送到了巴伐利亚的一个营地。” 弗兰克尔在奥斯威辛集中营的短暂时间得到了达豪分营考弗林三世的囚犯日志的证实,该日志列出了弗兰克尔于 25 年 1944 月 XNUMX 日抵达,也就是他离开特莱西恩施塔特六天后。 因此,弗兰克尔在《人类寻找意义》中对他在奥斯威辛长期逗留的描述是错误和不准确的。

    至于普里莫·列维,他是一名犹太共产主义者,很容易被德国人处决。 相反,他被留在了奥斯威辛集中营,被苏联军队“解放”了。 如果德国人对犹太人进行种族灭绝,人们会认为像列维这样的犹太共产主义者会在奥斯威辛被处决。

    • 谢谢: Sepp, Thomasina, Fox
  171. @mark green

    Send this video to the ADL, AIPAC, SPLC, JDL etc. I’m sure they’ll have a grand laugh, with pats on the back for all.

  172. @John Wear

    Do you think your arguments are convincing? You use supposed evidence for Frankl and supposed reasoning for Levi. Neither of your points mean anything to me. I don’t believe the “evidence” proves anything and the reasoning wouldn’t even stand up in a pub debate.

    Meanwhile, against your points, I have the extremely lucid accounts of two extremely wise and funny men. Frankl, in particular, has proven his exceptional humanity through his work. I don’t see that in you. I just see someone ranting about transdimensional reptiles, obsessing over how to pretend millions of disappeared Jews were murdered so that you can hate them even more, and peddling completely bonkers and harmful antivax idiocy.

    Perhaps you’re playing to the Unz audience of psychologically unsound fanatics, but, in a world where truth is extremely hard to know, I will always prioritise the views of those with empathy, epistemological humility, fully-opened senses and a profound capability for self-reflection over bizarre, millimetre deep monomaniacs.

    • 不同意: Badger Down
    • 回复: @John Wear
    , @Petermx
    , @Thomasina
  173. John Wear 说:
    @Triteleia Laxa

    如果你想阅读我对所谓大屠杀的分析,你可以在这个网站上阅读我的“德国战争”一书的第 8 章: https://www.unz.com/book/john_wear__germanys-war/.

    如果您想了解更多信息,请阅读我在 Inconvenient History 网站上的文章,网址为 https://www.inconvenienthistory.com/columnists/2873.

    甚至许多犹太历史学家也对所谓的大屠杀的目击者证词持批评态度。 例如,犹太历史学家塞缪尔·格林高兹(Samuel Gringauz)批评了他所谓的大多数犹太幸存者证词的“超历史”性质。 Gringauz 写道:“大多数回忆录和报告都充满了荒谬的冗长、文字夸张、戏剧性的效果、高估的自我膨胀、外行的哲学思想、可能的抒情、不受控制的谣言偏见、党派攻击和道歉。”

  174. Mulegino1 说:
    @SolontoCroesus

    纳粹只做“不好”的事情吗? 那些东西是什么?

    “纳粹”们做过或企图做的恶行有很多:

    消除德国共产主义革命的危险。

    将德国经济和德国人民置于生存水平之上,使国家摆脱对华尔街霸权和伦敦金融城的依赖。

    最终废除高利贷和发行无息货币。

    开始国际易货贸易。

    清理魏玛柏林的瘟疫地狱洞,以及犹太人对艺术和娱乐的统治所带来的变态反文化。

    恢复民族自豪感,恢复德国工人和农民的荣誉和尊严。

    要求修改完全不公正的凡尔赛“和平”政权。

    恢复德国的军事力量 平价 与其他欧洲大国。

    向其欧洲竞争对手提出了许多和平与裁军建议。

    世界上第一条高速公路的建设和完成。

    很明显,获胜的盟友需要妖魔化国家社会主义实验以隐藏他们自己的社会、经济和文化缺陷,从而犯下“历史上最大的罪行”,即想象中的“大屠杀”。

    • 回复: @Patrick McNally
  175. “We can observe them the way we observe and study animals, we can feel disgust for them or hostility, the way we do for the hyena, the jackal, or the spider, but to speak of hatred for them would raise them to our level.” -Stolypin

    Interestingly, Schopenhauer, in his essay “The Christian System,” takes Christianity to task for its lack of compassion for animals, and references some clergyman using, as a metaphor, burning a spider in a flame. Although only a metaphor, Sch. notes that he must have either done so himself, or watched others do so, and condemns this sadistic brutality.

    And yet here, and throughout his writings, the Jew is a figure of loathing and contempt. He, unlike Stolypin, could feel compassion even for spiders, but the Jew is, as they say, beyond the pale.

    • 回复: @mulga mumblebrain
  176. Given the well know Jewish trait of projection (“the Jew cries out as he 命中 美味“) we can infer that the obsessive repetition of “extermination” indicates their plans for us. The six million figure is no doubt part of some silly cabalistic game, but given the size of their world population can be glossed as “all of them” i.e. genocide of the goyim, with perhaps a few left to kiss their feet.

    • 同意: Sepp
  177. It seems to me that the big question all this is alluding to is whether old Adolf was a stooge to the Jews (whatever that really means here) more-or-less all along with their objective – as was subsequently experienced; creation of Israel, huge reparation monies, setting the stage for where we are now, OR was he a genuine ‘swell’ guy who knew exactly the situation, tried his best to change it, but ultimately failed?

    I hear accounts of him being financed by big banks etc., but is that enough? The questions seems to have split the British royalty.

    What I’m learning fast is that how I like to think things are and how they really are, are two completely different things.

  178. @SolontoCroesus

    Excellent comment! Right on the money. “Priss Factor” should change his handle to Piss Factor … even though Priss is an ugly name in itself.

  179. Petermx 说:
    @Triteleia Laxa

    What a ridiculous comment. Millions of disappeared Jews but they can’t locate any of them. Millions murdered in gas chambers but the lying allies never did an autopsy to confirm any Jews were murdered by gas and the highly praised show trials were criticized by the likes of Robert Taft and called a “fraud” by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court Harlan F. Stone. The Germans had much more to say.

    And what about the mass murdering Jews? They completely dominated the first government of the USSR, 80 to 85 % of the governments members were Jews and they dominated the brutal Soviet secret service and “Jews were the commandants of 11 out of the 12 main Stalinist-era Gulags” and starved 8 million Ukrainians to death. The Jews were so brutal that from across the USSR Latvians, Ukrainians, Byelorussians, Estonians and Russians welcomed the German troops as their saviors. And there is so much more that Jews did but could land you in jail if you talk about it.

    It just shows that incessant propaganda will win out over the truth.

  180. Thomasina 说:
    @Triteleia Laxa

    “Perhaps you’re playing to the Unz audience of psychologically unsound fanatics…”

    我对心理学了解得越多,我就越意识到大多数人的心理都不健全。 每个人都有盲点,有些比其他人更大,而且很大一部分人生活在一个否认和投射的世界中。

    People are trusting and easily led, and that’s why the propaganda has been so successful. People don’t really want to know the truth, especially when playing the “victim” is so much easier and provides so many perks. Knowing the truth about yourself, the beliefs you hold dear, can be life-shattering and produce tremendous “shame”. That’s why most people don’t want to go there.

    “She’s Come Undone:

    她发现一座太高的山
    And when she found out she couldn’t fly
    已经太迟了

    太晚了
    She’s gone too far
    She’s lost the sun
    She’s come undone

    她想要真相,但她得到的只是谎言
    是时候意识到
    为时已晚
    She’s come undone”

    但生活在一个否认的世界里根本就不是生活。

    • 回复: @Mulegino1
  181. @John Wear

    Thus, Frankl’s descriptions of his long stay at Auschwitz in “Man’s Search For Meaning” are false and inaccurate.

    More accurately, Frankl’s book is nothing more than storytelling, which is the same as Wiesel’s book “Night” and Rosenblatts’s book “The Girl at the Fence,” and all the many other 大屠杀 memoirs (thousands!). Jews can tell or make up a story and swear it’s true, while at the same time admit to interviewers events and details that make the story impossible!

    This is a purely Jewish specialty that most of us non-Jews will never understand. Therefore we say, “Why would they lie?” Which is why they get away with it.

    Wise up, goyim.

    • 同意: John Wear, Badger Down
    • 谢谢: Trinity
    • 回复: @geokat62
    , @georgie
  182. Sepp 说:
    @John Wear

    亲爱的威尔先生,

    请对 Triteleia Laxa 表现出一些同情。 她的父母都死在了死亡集中营。 她的父亲沉迷于手淫机,拒绝下车,所以党卫军派出熊和鹰来攻击他。 她的母亲在钢地板电室教瓦格纳的舞蹈课程时去世了。 所有的党卫军军官都穿着胶底靴,她穿着钢底踢踏舞鞋。

    更糟糕的是,她母亲用来做灯罩的皮肤,以及她父亲在数千小时的连续手淫中缩水的脑袋。

    When Triteleia Laxa was born in Israel in 1953 in a house her father stole from a Palestinian anti-semite, the Germans had not built the water system as reparations, so the sheets were filthy. Sure, the bed she was born in was paid for by reparations from Germany used to compensate her for the gassing of her parents, but the mattress was made of low quality German goose feathers instead of the prime German goose down that Jews prefer. Later in her life, Triteleia Laxa swore that she would get revenge against the Nazi’s who had forced her parents to emigrate from Germany with all their possessions and stolen loot in 1938.

    显然,您根本无法理解犹太人在他们忙于种族灭绝的人手中所遭受的所有苦难。

  183. @Sepp

    ‘The main take away here is that there is absolutely no proof of the 6 million, any more than there was any proof of the dozen or more claims of 6 million holocausts in the centuries leading up to the ultimate fake.’

    The ‘six million’ is a bit of a red herring. No serious researcher has ever arrived at that figure: the consensus appears to range between five million and five and a half million. As far as I know, the ‘six million’ stems from the figure used at Nuremberg, which in turn was the ‘best guess’ of the American Jewish Committee earlier in 1945 — a reasonably accurate guess under the circumstances, if one accepts that the Holocaust happened at all.

    Speaking for myself, I could see the ‘true’ figure being as low as four million, allowing for the natural human tendency to exaggerate, Jews finding it very opportune to forget they were Jewish and never going back, and Jews dying for reasons that had nothing to do with their being Jewish: the Commissar Order didn’t exempt gentile commissars, for example.

    On the other hand, one could also argue for a higher figure: Jews who fled into the woods and died uncounted, Jews who were killed in ‘wildcat’ killings by Romanians and Hungarians and so on without ever being listed.

    So even given belief in ‘the Holocaust,’ no particular figure can be given with any certainty: almost anything from four million to seven million is defensible.

    The real question is whether one thinks it was all a massive fraud, or on the contrary, that it really did occur. I go with the latter; to believe the former involves being very selective about what evidence and what numbers one will accept.

  184. On the same topic I refer Don Heddesheimer’s book : The first holocaust. (jewish fund raising campaigns with holocaust claims during & after WWI). Barnes review editor.

  185. Sepp 说:
    @Colin Wright

    “The ‘six million’ is a bit of a red herring. No serious researcher has ever arrived at that figure: the consensus appears to range between five million and five and a half million.
    ...
    no particular figure can be given with any certainty: almost anything from four million to seven million is defensible.”

    Lol. It is unfortunate that you have not met the same fate as Zündel, Irving or Haverbeck for daring to contradict the Jewish narrative. 6 million is sacred, unless you are a super jew.

    Once you proceed down the path of quibbling about a few hundred thousand here, a few hundred thousand there, their narrative is destroyed. Jewish power will not allow salami tactics when it comes to the holocaust. Besides, 6 million is a part of the entire magick ritual. The topic of this thread is how Jews have been kvetching and sqealing about a 6 million dead jew holocaust for centuries. The 6 million figure is sacred. How would it look if all of a sudden “historians” decide that more Armenians or Ukrainians were genocided by Jews than fake Jews were genocided by Germany?

    It is perfectly clear to the majority of the readers of these comments that you are a semitic apologist. A shabbos douchebag. You cannot provide any credible evidence for even the low ball 4 million gassed and cremated Jews you are blathering about.

  186. jasmin 说:

    The late nineteenth and early twentieth century was a time of British imperialism wedded to Jewish finance. Germany was an economic competitor and had to be destroyed. This British Jewish unholy alliance brought us into WWI and WWll. Unfortunately. Jewish pressure brought America into both wars. And today the Jews push America toward a war with Iran with could bring in Russia. as well. And the Republicans carry on about America first. It should’ve America first with regard to Israel as well. EnoughAmerican blood and treasure have been wasted supporting and defending Jews. And what has America received in return? Answer: the attack on The Liberty, 911, Jonathan Pollard, The Rosenbergs, the neoconservatives, and overall control of America and the attempted cultural destruction

  187. jasmin 说:
    @Observator

    你看到的每个犹太人都说他是大屠杀幸存者。 如果有这么多人幸存下来,6万人怎么死。

    • 回复: @HdC
  188. geokat62 说:
    @Sepp

    How would it look if all of a sudden “historians” decide that more Armenians or Ukrainians were genocided by Jews than fake Jews were genocided by Germany?

    Superb query!

  189. Since we mainly seem to be on the same page here.

    现实检查……

    场景:

    Let’s say we were actually living in a real universe, and not this fake fairies-tail monstrosity, and things shifted radically. I mean: the shots were known by all as ((their)) mass-murder weapon, say we’d lost 500,000,000 souls to ((them)) , and ((they)) were well-and-truly on the run, with absolutely nowhere to hide, and no-one to defend ((them)).

    问题:

    我们真的做((他们))吗? 我的意思是为了我们自己、我们的复仇、我们孩子的生殖器、我们的未来、我们的世界,无论你想要什么动机,我们是否确保这场大屠杀真的是一场真正的大屠杀,也是我们永远需要的最后一场想知道这样,永远永远,阿门? 还是我们坐下来看看辛德勒的名单,让((他们))悄悄地重新开始((他们))“生意”?

    只是说

  190. @Petermx

    Until now, I hadn’t heard of this book “Jewish-Run Concentration Camps in the Soviet Union.” I’m going to read it.

    • 谢谢: Petermx
  191. @geokat62

    “Start to resist or cease to exist.”

    完美的。 刚刚好。

  192. @James J O'Meara

    To reduce a human to the level of an insect is indeed wicked, but the Zionazis do that, in word and deed, to the Palestinians, every day. The Talmudists see the goyim as inferior to Jews, as a form of higher animal. I reject all dehumanisation, including Judaic dehumanisation of the goyim. End that and you would end much Judeophobia, and the rest would be, unambiguously, simply the fault of the hater entirely.

    • 同意: Towey, Kolya Krassotkin
  193. @John Wear

    I think you could call them ‘hypnohistorical’ as well. However, when you consider both the horrors that they had survived, and the horrors of traditional Judaic brainwashing into paranoia, fear and xenophobia, I’m not surprised that they ‘lost it’.

  194. @Triteleia Laxa

    人们可以将他们的书视为“精彩而富有同情心”,但它们是虚构的。 没关系。

    • 同意: Mehen, John Wear
    • 回复: @Mehen
    , @Trinity
    , @Triteleia Laxa
  195. @Sepp

    ‘…Once you proceed down the path of quibbling about a few hundred thousand here, a few hundred thousand there, their narrative is destroyed. Jewish power will not allow salami tactics when it comes to the holocaust. Besides, 6 million is a part of the entire magick ritual. The topic of this thread is how Jews have been kvetching and sqealing about a 6 million dead jew holocaust for centuries. The 6 million figure is sacred…’

    Jews may continue to refer to ‘the six million,’ but in my experience, it’s mainly Holocaust deniers themselves who insist on that figure and only that figure.

    Or maybe Raul Hilberg (5.1 million, if I recall aright) got cancelled and I never noticed. No one’s actually hung up on six million, that I can see.

  196. @Sepp

    ‘…It is perfectly clear to the majority of the readers of these comments that you are a semitic apologist. A shabbos douchebag. You cannot provide any credible evidence for even the low ball 4 million gassed and cremated Jews you are blathering about.’

    Pretty average for Holocaust deniers. What is it? Why do you feel entitled to abuse anyone who disagrees with you? Do you see it as a convincing argument?

  197. saggy 说: • 您的网站
    @Ron Unz

    大屠杀直到几年后才被发明出来,直到好莱坞在 1970 年代开始制作有关它的电影和电视节目时才被广泛相信。

    This is preposterous. The first holohoax was publicized in the NYT at least as early as 1906 – it was presumable believed, I don’t recall anyone calling the NYT fake news until relatively recently:The hoax was officially endorsed by the US govt. in 1944It was documented in the video ‘Nazi Concentration and Prison Camps’ shown at Nuremberg:

    The hoax was transformed from obvious phantasmagoria into judicially proven fact at the Nuremberg trials, so, they are the centerpiece of the holocaust hoax. This was explicit in the Nuremberg Ordinance No. 7 which reads in part …

    国际军事法庭在判决[…]中已确定或计划进行入侵,侵略行为,侵略战争,犯罪,暴行或不人道行为的裁决时,对下文成立的法庭具有约束力,除非受到国际法院的裁决,否则不得质疑。可能涉及其中的参与或任何特定人员的了解。 国际军事法庭在判决中的陈述[…]构成了所陈述事实的证据,而没有大量相反的新证据。

    • 回复: @Anonymous
    , @Wizard of Oz
  198. Mehen 说:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    当考虑到她的一个精神/人文主义英雄是骗子的可能性时,我想 Triteleia 的认知失调一定是巨大的。

  199. Trinity 说:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    大多数(((主流)))关于全息恶作剧的书籍实际上应该被标记为小说。

    • 同意: Kolya Krassotkin
  200. Anonymous[201]• 免责声明 说:
    @Colin Wright

    LOL, appealing to Hilberg? What a pathetic cuck you are. Why does this shit matter to you so much? Don’t you have better things to do than carry water for the Jews?

  201. Mulegino1 说:
    @Colin Wright

    对犹太人“受害者”的数量置若罔闻,就是要减少第二次世界大战的绝大多数受害者——尤其是德国和日本非战斗人员的困境,他们显然是焚烧的受害者。高空燃烧弹和原子弹轰炸-由“盟国”本身无可争议的证实。 苏联后方梯队在东普鲁士和大德国对妇女和儿童实施的大规模强奸和谋杀也是如此。 这些都没有争议,因为它得到了同盟国的公开证实。

    犹太人不应该受到特殊类别的伤害,因为绝对没有证据表明在不存在的大规模杀人毒气室中进行了大规模毒气,而且几乎没有证据表明在东线有数十万犹太人被大规模处决。 根本没有物证或真实的书面证据来证实这些事情。 一些犹太人无疑遭受了不公正待遇,但完全正义的受害者的主要主张似乎是基于这样一个事实,即被选中的人是为了诚实劳动而被征召入伍的。

    营地上的“Arbeit Macht Frei”标志一定让犹太城市化居民的心中感到恐惧,这主要是因为“Arbeit”部分。

    • 同意: Towey
    • 回复: @Colin Wright
  202. Mulegino1 说:
    @Thomasina

    人们并不真正想知道真相,尤其是当扮演“受害者”变得如此容易并提供如此多的好处时。

    瞧! 可以想象的对 Shoah Business 邪教的完美描述!

  203. GeneralRipper [又名“艾奇”] 说:

    Somewhere around 52,000,000 to 59,000,000 Christian Gentiles died in the same conflict.

    Why should I care whether 6,000,000 Jews did actually die during WW2?

    • 同意: Towey, Kolya Krassotkin
    • 回复: @Towey
  204. @Mulegino1

    ‘…Jewry does not deserve a special category of victimhood.

    Agree through here. My position is that the Holocaust happened alright — but in most respects, it wasn’t a particularly unique horror. I’m sure the distinction between a Jew gassed at Treblinka for being a Jew and a Silesian German girl raped and shot for being a German in Silesia would have been lost on both parties.

    It is ironic. On the one hand, I’m perpetually irritated by the fantastically disproportionate attention given to the Holocaust just about everywhere. On the other, I can pretty much count on being vilified here every time I insist it did in fact happen.

  205. Towey 说:
    @Sepp

    我从表格中注意到,欧洲的犹太人口在 1933 年到 1948 年之间保持相对稳定,但基督徒人口减少了近 100 亿! 除了盟军地毯式轰炸德国公民之外,这场大规模种族灭绝的其他原因是什么?
    将不胜感激任何输入。 谢谢你。

    • 回复: @Sepp
  206. Towey 说:
    @GeneralRipper

    According to the table above the Christian population in Europe declined by almost 100, million between 1933 and 1948.

  207. Towey 说:
    @Truth Vigilante

    广岛和长崎也是日本天主教徒最集中的地方。 我几乎不认为这两个城市被轰炸是巧合还是错误。
    日本天主教的历史是一个引人入胜的故事,它历经千辛万苦才被 WASP 炸弹摧毁。

    • 同意: Mulegino1
    • 回复: @Petermx
    , @Patrick McNally
  208. Anonymous[269]• 免责声明 说:
    @Colin Wright

    If you believe the absurd claims about Treblinka, which don’t merely include dubious stories about mass gassings with inefficient diesel engines, but also farcical accounts of mass exhumations and unbelievable open-air cremations (for which no kind of archaeological evidence exists), then you are part of the problem.

  209. @Ron Unz

    大屠杀直到几年后才被发明出来,直到好莱坞在 1970 年代开始制作有关它的电影和电视节目时才被广泛相信。

    大卫·恩格尔 holocaustism at New York U. and is a 学者在居住 at USHMM. According to Engel, holocaust “became a proper noun” after the Eichmann trial.
    Makes sense: killing a key witness to what really happened clears the way to making up whatever.

    I’m not impressed with “mass formation” meme that Mattias Desmet is pushing, especially since he bases much of his thinking on Hannah Arendt’s works, 艾希曼在耶路撒冷极权主义的起源。 Neither book is available in my town’s extensive library system, not even the “Jewish” branch. With good reason, perhaps: “Origins” strikes me as a grab-bag of political science theories, and Arendt’s 艾希曼 reports that the trial was “theater,” scripted, even staged by David ben Gurion to “shame the world” for what they/it did to the Jews.”

    The difficulty you face is that you’re now an elderly individual, who finds it very difficult to admit you’ve lived most of your life believing in ridiculous nonsense.

    Atom bomb of a statement, Ron.
    I’ve commented a couple times about the victory dance taken by the lawyers who brought a civil suit against Unite the Right leaders. Their video conversation was titled, “How We Defeated the Nazis in Charlottesville;” they stated that the trial was “not about Robert E Lee” but about “carrying tiki torches, and reading Mein Kampf, and swastikas.” Explaining that the same basis as was used for that trial — an 1871 anti-KKK law — would be the foundation for the prosecution of Jan 6 arrestees, one of the lawyers say, “the phrase, ____ will not replace us” is exactly the same as “Stop the Steal.”

    Proclaiming the Charlottesville judgment as a great victory, the lawyers viewed it as a harbinger of even greater corrections in the ways of American society.

    In short, these women cannot let it go. Holocaust is yesterday, today and tomorrow.
    In her concluding remarks the lead lawyer — many here probably know her name — said, “When I was a kid in Cleveland learning about the holocaust, I used to think, What would I have done if I had been in Germany then?”

    I used to live in Cleveland, too. I wonder what more zionists and the Allies could have done to destroy Germany that they didn’t do then.

    The Charlottesville, and the Jan 6 lawyers, stuck in their holocaust mental loop, are still punishing Germans.

    This is serious. These are rabid creatures on the loose.

  210. @mulga mumblebrain

    Look, silly. I know you want to persuade everyone that the Holocaust didn’t happen because you think then the Israelis will be forced to leave their homes and you can feel a sort of pseudo-personal victory over them, but that no longer makes any sense. With ever year that passes, both Holocaust survivors and actual Palestinian refugees die out. There are barely any of either left alive. They’re basically both history and the situation on the ground is the situation on the ground. Sorry the people you identify with lost!

    And don’t think I don’t get you. I wanted Jon Snow to become King on Game of Thrones and that too didn’t happen. Boo hoo for me.

  211. Mulegino1 说:
    @Colin Wright

    这很讽刺。 一方面,我一直对几乎无处不在对大屠杀的异常不成比例的关注感到恼火。 另一方面,每次我坚持它确实发生时,我几乎可以指望在这里受到诽谤。

    到底发生了什么事?

    如果您的意思是一些犹太人在第二次世界大战期间死亡,那是没有问题的。

    但是,如果你认为某些犹太人“在特雷布林卡被毒死”,那就需要详细说明。

    我不相信任何犹太人在那个集中营被毒死,因为所谓的“目击者”所描述的根本不可信。 Treblinka II 的位置也没有任何可靠的遗骸痕迹、巨大的墓穴或毒气设施。

  212. Fox 说:
    @Colin Wright

    So, what is this “holocaust”? It comes across as an elastic notion that can be stretched into the general lot of the Jews before and during the war (e.g., restrictions of employment, quota rules, the need to register, concentration of them in camps or town quarters -in other words, a forced ghettoization- forced emigration, etc.) or into the 6-million gassing narrative (then it’s the “Holocaust”), just as the need of the situation demands it.
    这是什么?
    Even the numbers of Jews in Europe is only a number of conjecture, and was 80 years ago a number of conjecture. I think Eichmann estimated it as about 3 million, but then there were the Jews in the SU, there were Jews in Vichy France, in England, Denmark. How many Jews were there and how many were there after May 8, 1945? From the number of restitution cases filed with the government of the FRG till the mid-sixties, I believe there were about 4.5 million, it would appear that this “holocaust” or “Holocaust” has left an enormous number of Jews who had lived through the years of the war. How is this possible if so many were killed without leaving a trace?
    Dalton’s article poses this question somewhat differently. It appeals to the question of plausibility of a narrative that is and was buttressed by very few personal accounts by people who don’t always come across as sane. Just look at a picture of Elie Wiesel and how he looks into the world with his big, wide-open eyes which show a strange restlessness in that look. Are there even 50?-disregarding the people “who kept silent for decades”. Think of the massive governmental propaganda effort which now includes judicial threats, a network of institutions acting as propaganda outlets, inculcating the story of unique Jewish suffering into the minds of the young in school, and continuing with the adults, a maniacal self-referential system of discourse and metaphor. There is even a “Holocaust monument” in Shanghai.
    一旦宣传停止,这种疯子意识形态就会消失。 -因为它的支持来自恐惧,而这种恐惧一旦消除,就不会再影响人们了。 因此,人们关心的越少,宣传就越疯狂和坚持不懈,成为维持生命的唯一手段。
    如果电视台和广播电台、报纸和杂志,如果学校里所谓的历史课突然停止,在每一个可能和难以置信的转折点上提出来,会发生什么?

  213. Mulegino1 说:
    @Fox

    回想起来,“大屠杀”是犹太人想要公开对外邦人做的事情,但到目前为止还做不到。

    因此,下一个最好的事情是将这个愿望应用到国家社会主义德国的德国人身上,作为“最好的外邦人”,他们必须被摧毁才能完成塔木德的成人礼。 在这种情况下,shabbos goy 辅助人员非常乐意提供帮助。

  214. Petermx 说:
    @Towey

    None of the key scientists that built those two bombs were WASP’s but it might have been WASP’s that chose the cities to be bombed. With the exception of J. Robert Oppenheimer, the head of the project, every other key scientist (about 8 of them) emigrated to the USA from Europe. Most went to German universities for there educations, as did Oppenheimer where he received his PHD. Many were Jewish.

    • 回复: @Towey
    , @anarchyst
  215. Thomasina 说:
    @Triteleia Laxa

    “Yeah, I think I’ll take the first-hand accounts of such brilliant and empathetic individuals as Victor Frankl and Primo Levi over your bizarre concoctions.”

    I read Viktor Frankl’s book “Man’s Search for Meaning”. It was very moving.

    But if it WAS untrue, if it was all a fabrication, then it must have been written to garner sympathy, or possibly for retribution. An “empathetic individual” wouldn’t do something like this; they would tell the truth. It takes great courage to tell the truth.

    If Viktor Frankl’s account is false, then how much empathy did he show to the German people whose lives have been severely affected? Maybe he thought they had it coming? He lost, so he was going to make sure they lost too?

    • 回复: @anarchyst
  216. @Fox

    It is an abomination that there are Holocaust Memorials everywhere, but virtually none to the hundreds of other genocides. How do people allow this narcissistic exceptionalism? Particularly the descendants of the victims of the other genocides.

    • 回复: @Carolyn Yeager
  217. Sepp 说:
    @Towey

    Even more fascinating is that the majority of those murdered Christians were Protestants, around 70,000,000 while there was “only” a 1.5 million Catholics and 17m Orthodox who lost their lives. Of course we know what Stalin and the Judeo-NKVD did to the Orthodox Christians. But why so many dead Protestants and so few Catholics?

    Since southern Germany is generally more Catholic and the north Protestant, perhaps the explanation lies in the Allied bombing campaigns. German cities in the north were far easier to carpet bomb. I would also guess that most of the Prussians murdered by the Red Rapist Army were also Protestant. Additionally, the north west was “liberated” by the British Army and north east by the Russian rapists.

    Another possible explanation would be that Jews were more afraid of Catholics and didn’t want them aware of the extent of their goy-genocide so they manipulated the numbers so it looked like mostly Protestants were eliminated. They know that Catholics would not be very concerned about dead Protestants.

    I’ll post the World Almanac image again below the more for easy reference:

    [更多]

  218. @Triteleia Laxa

    Gibbering racist buffoon-I believe that millions of Jews were killed during WW2. I see that your vile indifference to the continuing oppression of the imprisoned Palestinians, after nearly eighty years of suffering and sadistic cruelty, reveal you to be a nassty racist. The winers and losers mentality is despicable-one could, if vile enough, say that the Jews ‘lost’ during WW2. Do you imagine that continuing race hatred and oppression makes Israelis ‘safe’.

    • 回复: @Triteleia Laxa
  219. Towey 说:
    @Petermx

    World war II was instigated by WASPs who by their actions provoked war with Germany and Japan on behalf of their Jewish masters.
    In doing so they destroyed Catholic Europe and the largest Catholic community in Japan.
    The same goes for 9/11 where the WASPs replaced secular leaders in Iraq and Libya, who protected the millennial Christian communities, with Muslims who persecuted them and unleashed a tidal wave of Muslim immigrants to finish off the destruction of Western European civilization.

  220. John Wear 说:
    @Triteleia Laxa

    Some Jews have testified under oath to the fraudulent nature of the “Holocaust.” For example, Joseph G. Burg, a Jewish author who wrote several books on the Holocaust story, testified at the 1988 Ernst Zündel trial that he had spoken to hundreds of people who had been at Auschwitz-Birkenau when he visited the camp in the fall of 1945. Burg formed the opinion that there were no German extermination camps, the gas chambers had never existed, and there was no plan to exterminate the Jews of Europe.

    Joseph Burg also testified at the 1988 Zündel trial that he spoke to hundreds of people who serviced and operated the crematoria, but he could not find anyone who had operated homicidal gas chambers. Burg testified that the crematoria had been established for hygienic purposes as a result of typhus and other diseases. Burg also testified that he attended the Nuremberg trials in 1946 and met Ilya Ehrenburg, who had visited Auschwitz-Birkenau, as well as a Jewish publisher who had been interned in Auschwitz for several years. Both Ehrenburg and the Jewish publisher said they did not see any homicidal gas chambers while at Auschwitz-Birkenau

    • 回复: @Triteleia Laxa
    , @simple mind
  221. We can’t even muster the will to say no to face nappies and useless, deadly injections. There is no collective will in most societies anymore, least of all Western/European ones.

  222. @Triteleia Laxa

    Palestinians I know still have keys to their homes in Palestine. Symbolic or not, they live it in a way the Jewish phonies cannot ever do. . I am in Australia, others I know in Mexico and UK.
    . Though it occurs in a different way, Holocaust survivors also seem to be perennial. If anything there are more each year.

  223. @Petermx

    你写了:

    Millions murdered in gas chambers but the lying allies never did an autopsy to confirm any Jews were murdered by gas

    In fact, the British DID conduct hundreds of autopsies on those dead they found in the liberated camps and NOT ONE of them was found to be due to gassing.

    • 谢谢: Petermx
    • 回复: @Petermx
    , @Corvinus
  224. @Colin Wright

    你写了:

    Speaking for myself, I could see the ‘true’ figure [of Jews that were alleged to have perished at the hands of Germans] being as low as four million

    Yes, I could too – if I was taking hallucinogenic drugs.

    CW, you clearly have not done any objective research on the matter. It seems that all you know about this issue comes courtesy of watching re-runs of Schindlers List and reading Anne Frank’s discredited and fraudulent diary.

    You urgently need to read Chapter 8 of John Wear’s book right now (scroll up to his comment where he’s graciously provided a link).

    As for your remark that ‘anything from 4 million to 7 million is defensible’, you’ve made a typo.
    Of course you mean ‘completely INdefensible’.

    In fact, seeing as the true figure is in the hundreds of thousands (overwhelmingly due to the 1942/43 typhus epidemics and malnutrition in the concluding months of the war as the German food transport logistics system was decimated by Allied bombing and strafing), any figure above that is pure Zio propaganda.

    No need to thank me for correcting your typographic error.

    别客气。

    • 谢谢: John Wear
    • 回复: @Colin Wright
  225. anarchyst 说:
    @Petermx

    Nagasaki was chosen to be obliterated by the jews because it held the greatest number of Christians in all of Japan.
    Jewish hatred of Christianity knows no bounds…

    • 回复: @Towey
  226. anarchyst 说:
    @Thomasina

    Frankl was at Auschwitz for three days yet he writes as if he had spent his entire time there.
    More lies and fabrications from the holohoax crowd…

    • 同意: John Wear
  227. Towey 说:
    @anarchyst

    They were Catholics who had managed to keep the Faith for two hundred years without priests, Churches, the Mass and access to the sacraments except Baptism and Marriage. They had been severely repressed and tortured. Even the Catholic Church didn’t know of their existence. It was only when the French ( I believe) Embassy built a Church in the late 19th century that they dared to come out of hiding and established a large community based in Nagasaki.
    The expulsion of the Catholic Church from Japan was the result of intrigues and meddling on the part of British and Dutch Protestants who wanted to monopolise commerce with Japan which resulted in Japan withdrawing from the modern world completely.

    • 谢谢: anarchyst
  228. Anonymous[300]• 免责声明 说:
    @saggy

    受虐俄罗斯 by Dr. C. C. Young (New York: Devin-Adair, 1915), pp. 23-24:

    “Some six years ago, I had an experience which vividly illustrated this point. I was in Odessa at the time, and that citywas then considered one of the quietest in Europe. I remember being amused by reading in the Paris edition of the New York 先锋 an Associated Press despatch announcing another dreadful Jewish massacre in that city. On the night of the supposed massacre, I had been with a party of friends, motoring through Odessa, until three o’clock in the morning, and we had been aware of no disturbance of any kind, nor saw nor heard anything that might have been construed as a commotion. When, later, we showed the paper to Governor Tolmatchoff, he laughingly remarked that if we stayed long enough in Odessa, we would have a chance to read more such despatches, as they were being sent to New York from time to time, and from there cabled back to Paris, by a certain class of anarchistically inclined Hebrews, to stir up the minds of the better class of their own people and of the Gentiles, and open a channel of revenue, supposedly for the cause of the downtrodden Jews. The means so obtained, the Governor told us, seldom reached the people for whom they were intended, and generally went to further the ends of the anarchists and revolutionists and, he laughingly concluded, to contradict these false reports would consume the entire Russian budget!”

    https://archive.org/details/abusedrussia00youn

    • 哈哈: Orville H. Larson
  229. Anonymous[281]• 免责声明 说:
    @Ron Unz

    Brother Nathanael was interviewed by Adam Green on 了解更多新闻. Sorry I can’t cue it up to the right spot but Bro. Nathanael— who had an Orthodox Jewish upbringing in Newton, Massachusetts— made a startling comment:

    [@19:00]“We were not taught the Holocaust in the 1950’s, there was no such word. We weren’t taught gas chambers. As far as we knew they never existed. And my father hated Elie Wiesel. He hated him. My father called him a fraud…”



    视频链接

    • 回复: @Carolyn Yeager
  230. Katrinka 说:
    @Yukon Jack

    西方文明在斯大林格勒死去。

    • 回复: @littlereddot
  231. @John Wear

    You’re worse than this well-named “Mumblebrain” is as a peddler of loser ideology.

    至少他只输了战争,没有辩论,但你输了 几十年前。

    对自己诚实。 获得生命。

    Anyone sufficiently obsessed can convince themselves of anything in this huge, infinitely complicated world of humanity’s. Selective bias and selective interpretation will do all of the work without the individual even really needing to try, but your bias will not persuade anyone else.

    This explains your cycle and your trap. You’re the heir to 80 years of failed argumentation following the worst war defeat in human history. It isn’t working sad gets both more irrelevant and somehow even less likely to work every year. Move on.

    Or at least work out what in your personal life has caused you to try your hardest to be among the world’s most hated losers. Perhaps you’ll gain some understanding of your actual motivations and find some fulfillment?

    • 巨魔: Petermx
    • 回复: @John Wear
    , @Mehen
  232. HdC 说:
    @jasmin

    The answer is obvious: They didn’t.

    Israeli media proclaimed in the early 2000’s that 1,000,000 holocaust survivors were still living. If you’re any good at basic math, and look up mortality statistics, you could calculate that about 5 million survivors were necessary to leave 1 million 55 or so years later.

    Then there is the complete absence of any forensic or other verifiable evidence.

    One would think that there ought to be hills of teeth and bone fragments all over the place.

  233. John Wear 说:
    @Triteleia Laxa

    另一个可信的目击者是出生于奥地利的加拿大人 Maria Van Herwaarden,她于 2 年 1942 月 1945 日至 1988 年 XNUMX 月在比克瑙被拘留。范赫瓦登在 XNUMX 年的 Ernst Zündel 审判中作证说,她在比克瑙没有看到任何类似于大规模谋杀的东西。 然而,她确实作证说,比克瑙的许多囚犯死于疾病,一些囚犯自杀了。 在这次审判期间没有传唤控方证人,因为控方知道没有幸存者能够经受住 Zündel 辩护律师的盘问。

    杀人毒气室的存在也被科学证据驳斥。 你可能会喜欢阅读我的文章 https://inconvenienthistory.com/12/1/7200 记录杀人毒气室的不存在。

    据称在所谓的大屠杀期间死亡的 XNUMX 万犹太人也被证伪。 请参阅我的文章 https://inconvenienthistory.com/13/1/7582 记录这一事实。

    我不打算按照您的建议“继续前进”。 官方的大屠杀故事是一个容易反驳的骗局。

    • 同意: Mulegino1
    • 回复: @Triteleia Laxa
  234. 托马斯一针见血。 布尔什维克从 66 年到 1917 年谋杀了 1957 万人(亚历山大·索尔仁尼琴),撒谎的主流媒体为他们掩盖了这一点,直到今天,2022 年。好莱坞制作了数千部关于纳粹的电影,而只有少数关于纳粹大屠杀的电影布尔什维克。 难怪说谎的主流媒体和好莱坞是由同一个布尔什维克部落拥有和控制的。 一切都是为了犹太复国主义者为小偷、骗子和谋杀创造一个安全港,没有引渡问题。 巴顿是对的,西方与错误的敌人作战。

    • 回复: @geokat62
  235. @mulga mumblebrain

    Spare me your politically correct garb and faux humanitarianism. You remind me of my borderline personality friend. Always thinking she is oh so empathetic, but doesn’t understand her actions or how other people feel. She thinks she is an empath, when really she is just emotionally incontinent and extremely self-absorbed. For some reason, this is an especially prominent personality type of Muslim men in my experience. I think it often results from their mothers taking revenge on their fathers by turning their sons into fake new husbands for themselves. This leads to the sons always trying to be uber masculine, but usually being sexually unattracted to women, turbulent and centred on their own victimhood. Which then leads to the next generation treating their wives (beards) badly and the cycle continuing. Human cultures can be very funny indeed.

    All the Palestinians need to do is admit they have lost their long war and sue for peace. But their idiot leaders have been lying to them for decades and pretending that victory is somehow around the corner, even as their strategic position gets ever worse.

    Importantly, the Palestinians have been losing this war for almost 80 years, and the longer you go on losing a war and dragging it out, the less favourable to you one can expect peace to be. Bad luck. The Palestinians should have accepted peace many times decades ago.

    Even the most compassionate family eventually cut off their drug addict, loser and petty criminal cousin, no matter how much of a victim of circumstances they affect to be. Sometimes keeping people from reality, as the international community has done for the Palestinians, for decades, by enabling their leadership, even if reality is their total defeat, is actually the bad thing to do.

    Reality is that they lost, and have lost for 80 years, and now need to come to terms with that and hope the Israelis 慷慨 give them a good deal.

  236. geokat62 说:
    @Dennis Gannon

    好莱坞制作了数以千计的关于纳粹的电影,而关于布尔什维克大屠杀的电影却寥寥无几。

    你能提供几部关于布尔什维克大屠杀的电影的名字吗?

    我好像一个都不记得了。

    • 同意: Mehen
  237. @mulga mumblebrain

    How do people allow this narcissistic exceptionalism?

    This is the question that must be asked, and an explanation be demanded. How and why, indeed?

    Seems to me it is the kind of FEAR Jews instill in those they target as their enemies. It’s always struck me that in the New Testament of the bible, the phrase appears several times “for fear of the Jews” the Christians hid themselves or avoided certain places. They didn’t seem to have such fear of any other group. In the Old Testament there are a plethora of stories of the vicious nature of Jewish retaliation or just plain scorched-earth ethnic cleansing to take what they wanted by utterly destroying the current inhabitants — as with today’s Palestinians.

    We have the example of just how thoroughly organized jewry was able to destroy the mighty nation and people of Germany, and feel no pity — even today, 80-100 years later, they keep at it, will not let up. Seems to me Jews have demonstrated such ruthless hatred and taste for punishing behavior they put the “fear of the Jews” into the vast majority of sheeple. Anything but Jewish wrath directed against you.

    What to do about it? Seems to me we need to open our eyes wide and look at who is winning and who is losing. The war exists; we didn’t cause it, it’s against us, nevertheless. T. Dalton does a good job in this article of getting us to see the eternal nature of the Jew. Devoted libertarians like John Wear and Franklin Ryckaert are committed to the idea there are “good Jews” and everyone should/must be judged individually, which unfortunately is impossible in this world of 8 billion individuals. Plus the fact that if all Jews are blamed for what is done in the name of Jews, the “good” Jews would galvanize to stop the “bad” Jews, instead of being let off the hook. At least, that’s the idea Henry Ford had. https://carolynyeager.net/intljewstudy

    There’s a need to stand together on this across racial divides, but that’s the solution the Jews have been good at preventing.

  238. annamaria 说:
    @Triteleia Laxa

    同意。
    We should tell “drop dead” to all these holobiz museums

    • 同意: Katrinka
  239. R2b 说:
    @Sepp

    如果这些统计数据属实,这很有可能,那么通过第二次世界大战,某个群体增加了,而不是减少了!
    令人着迷,不是吗?

  240. @Anonymous

    Have to correct the statement that Brother Nathanael had “an orthodox Jewish upbringing.” Not true at all. His family were reform. Furthermore, if they were orthodox, his father would never have hated Elie Wiesel (who orthodox) or called him a fraud.

    Look, I go back to the 1950s too (actually the 1940s), in Illinois, and nothing like “holocaust” or even the war was 曾经 mentioned in school. No one talked about Hitler that I can remember, and I would have been sensitive to it. In my senior year in high school, American History was a required subject; I recall that as we got close to 1939-45, I became concerned that we might read bad things about Germany. I looked ahead in the textbook and was relieved to see only a small box on the side of one page that said something about concentration camps, with I think a small picture. Nothing about gas chambers or other special horrors. This was 1959.

    Around 1955, I read an article in Look magazine (very popular then) about Adolf Hitler and why the Germans “followed” him. It said basically the people were hypnotized, mesmerized by Hitler and his nighttime torchlight rallies. It had pictures and made the point that Germans were specially susceptible to that type of “trance.” (IOW, could not be trusted in the future; had to be watched.) I remember having a negative reaction to the article and not believing it. I was super interested in it though.

    So there was nothing ‘startling’ about Nathanael’s comment. Jews didn’t make anything out of it either, in spite of the Nuremberg Tribunals, which I think people simply- didn’t believe or pay much attention to. Everyone wanted to forget it, to just get back to their lives and move forward. Thus it’s true, “Holocaust” was invented or resurrected sometime around 1970 and is a media creation … after the Zionist Jews had firm control of media.

    • 回复: @ivan
    , @Sparkon
    , @Katrinka
    , @Incitatus
  241. R2b 说:
    @Colin Wright

    Holocaust was on Germans, not jews, mind you!
    And all the other Europeans.
    And in that I count Russians.
    But jews? How many died?
    Certainly according their number.
    What does Red Cross say?
    Shame shame shame on you.

  242. @Craig Nelsen

    感谢您演示如何使用统计数据撒谎。 为什么要从 1917 年开始? 那一年是犹太人把美国拖入第一次世界大战的那一年吗? 为什么不包括那场战争的其余部分,从 1914 年开始?

    底部四名球员被贴上了普通的名字,但前两名被给予了他们的犹太(AshkeNazi)种族主义诽谤的名字。 也许你的意思是德国人。

    Did Germans “murder” millions of “European Jews”? Evidence please. Deaths do not automatically count as murder, so don’t bother proving millions of deaths.

    Did Germans “murder” millions of “(racist slur)Europeans”? Evidence please. Remember there were two large wars during that period, and Germany didn’t start them.

    但我同意你的一般观点,即犹太人做了很多他们所谓的困难,即使其他人的情况更糟。 谁发动了那些世界大战?

    • 同意: HdC
  243. Infoman 说: • 您的网站

    Doing some reading from a website called Jordanmaxwellshow.com, and listening to some of his podcasts, he tells the audience, that not too many people understand that Communism was a experiment created in England, to be put to practice in Russia, as a experiment. He continues to explain that as it progressed in its failure, the same people that created Communism, gave birth to a new form of Goverment, called Democracy.

    [更多]

    He explains with details on the subject, and in his research website he shows graphical depictions to support his claim.

    He firther fifnishes with a statement, which we have heard before, and that is:

    They just swapped from Military uniforms to Bussiness suits, and called it Democracy.

    Referring to the change in name only, but practicing the same brutal acts, as if they were communists.

    That is, under Putin, and anti governement marches or boycotts, all protesters are beaten, arrested or killed, to not bee seen for a while or forever.

    Like Israel, and its odd as it is, they cannot tolerate criticism or any one that has the ability to question or challenge the so called Status quo of the current goverment system in Russia.

    How odd that both, not exclusive, arrest, incriminate or encarcerate any other political party rivals to avoid a regime change, that is Israel and Russia.

    And if you look into russian coverage of Putin as he walks around his so called White Palace, white house, he walks on red carpet as we might see in movies, that monarcs, kings, would walk on.

    Another odd thing is that The USA Capiol Building, the Vatican main Building and another building which I will not mention, have the same looking, specification, and dimensions.

    I will also mention here again, that our so called capitol building, was originally being built by a russian construction company, and to make it not so obvious that America has been under russian control since the 1800’s, the original building was demolished, and was rebuilt by a so called american construction company.

    Also, there is a town in the west, that the only requirement ot live there is that you must prove that you are a true communist. Look it up.

  244. Mr Guy 说:

    In 250 years the rabbis will have retconned the Talmud to turn Drumpf into Gaydolf Hortor 2.0 and we will have to remember the 6 gollion gas-incinerated in the years 2016-2020. “On Jan 6, 2021, the goys gassed 600,000 on the Day of Insurrection…” Steven Spielberg IV, the great grandkid will make a fortune on the movie #NeverForget

  245. @Triteleia Laxa

    All the Jews need to do is admit they have put “israel” in the wrong place. Their children are not safe and never will be. Their idiot leaders have been lying to them for decades and pretending that victory is somehow around the corner, even as their strategic position gets ever worse.

    The “is” have been losing this war for almost 80 years, and the longer you go on losing a war and dragging it out, the more crimes you commit and lies you tell. The “israelis” should have moved out in peace many times decades ago.

    Even the most compassionate family (USA) eventually cut off their drug addict, loser and petty criminal cousin (“israel”), no matter how much the “is” wail about of their victimhood. Reality, f or the “is”, is being an international pariah, a criminal gang, built on murder, theft, and pollard, epstein, maxwell, and ponzi scams.

    The “is” have lost, and have lost for 80 years, and now need to come to terms with that and hope the world generously gives them a fat profit. Get out of Asia.

  246. @Colin Wright

    The ‘six million’ is a bit of a red herring.

    What a grand and bold piece of holocaust denial! Go to any holocaust museum or memorial, sit in on any high school holocaust studies class, you’ll learn that “six million”, murdered by the Germans, is central to the holocaust story. Check it out!

  247. @Colin Wright

    You are wrong. Jews, “israelis”, zionists insist on the 6m figure. Go back to the title of the above article. Who has been talking about 6m Jews since the early 1900s?

    Here’s the USHMM!

    https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/introduction-to-the-holocaust

    KEY FACTS
    1
    Antisemitism was at the foundation of the Holocaust. Antisemitism, the hatred of or prejudice against Jews, was a basic tenet of [racist slur deleted] ideology. This prejudice was also widespread throughout Europe.

    2
    [racist slur deleted] Germany’s persecution of Jews evolved and became increasingly more radical between 1933 and 1945. This radicalization culminated in the mass murder of six million Jews.

    Got that? Murder. Six million Jews. = Holocaust. [racist slur deleted]

    • 同意: Carolyn Yeager
  248. ivan 说:
    @Carolyn Yeager

    The ranking Jewish writers didn’t make much of it. Most went along with the idea that if Jews suffered, they suffered as victims of war, in the same manner as other victims of war. Joseph Heller didn’t mention it, Stanley Elkin had rabbis going on riffs about an indifferent God, Norman Mailer not until his book on based loosely on Hitler’s childhood – The Castle in the Forest – which I did not read, but which I expect is full of Mailer’s trademark reductionisms to sexual or necromantic factors. Nor did Saul Bellow follow up much on the Holocaust, though he had a book – Mr Sammler’s Planet – with a character who survived the war.

    But a second tier authour like Jerzy Kozinski in the Painted Bird, managed to slander the Poles so thoroughly, that until the election of Pope JPII I thought that the Poles were all brutes.

    • 回复: @Carolyn Yeager
  249. @Triteleia Laxa

    > “随着时间的流逝,大屠杀幸存者和实际的巴勒斯坦难民都死了。”

    我不想被视为反犹太人,但这读起来令人惊讶。 犹太人实际上强调了几十年来巴勒斯坦难民的数量是如何增长的——因为穆斯林管理的联合国是反以色列的,并阻止难民忘记他们的家园并融入他们周围的新东道国社会。

  250. Insouciant 说:
    @John Wear

    Primo Levi = Primo hypocrite. He was saved by an Italian bricklayer, who was never lionized as some sort of hero. (Wiki says Levi was “slave labor,” while Lorenzo Perrone, who shared his food that kept Levi alive, was “forced labor.”)
    Nor did the bricklayer return from the war to his home in Italy and enjoy a life with a family, as Levi did; Perrone died of tuberculosis about 7 years after the war ended, while Levi is said to have committed suicide at age 67 after writing a lugubrious memoir of his “holocaust” enslavement.

    Don’t know much about Frankl; it appears his holocaust suffering was, shall we say, apocryphal.

    On the other hand, Bruno Bettelheim, also a psychologist, spent ten and a half months in concentration camp — two week’s shy of Levi’s 11 months “enslavement.” He, too, wrote of the experience, but in a detached way, as one standing outside the situation and observing it clinically. Based on the dismissive wording in his wikipedia entry, his writing did not please the holocausters. Bettelheim also committed suicide, at age 87 in a retirement community in Washington, DC’s Maryland suburbs.

  251. Al Ross 说:

    一位为本网站的行家所熟知的退休学者,在仔细阅读二战盟军领导人的回忆录后,对他发现(或者更确切地说没有发现)表示惊讶:

    https://alt.conspiracy.narkive.com/uu9oxAYB/a-tricky-little-problem-the-missing-holocaust

  252. @Ron Unz

    “因为他们不想让未来的历史学家嘲笑他们。”

    你能参考一下吗,罗恩? 请原谅我,但一个星期你为直到最近才开始阅读多个焦点的历史而道歉,下一个你是专家。

    我读过的大部分历史,而且我读过很多,都涉及 1944 年和 1945 年的实地事实,其中有战斗师指挥官亲眼目睹被遗弃的集中营和党卫军监狱的第一手资料。推进盟友。

    我遇到了一些建议,所有这些东西都是战时宣传——几乎所有这些都在 UNZ Review 上。

    • 回复: @Mehen
    , @Anonymous
    , @Ron Unz
    , @Petermx
  253. Mehen 说:
    @Triteleia Laxa

    你遇到了一位历史学家(约翰·威尔饰),他提供了一个你觉得具有挑战性或难以接受的事实会计。

    你的回答是:“John Wear 是一个失败者,需要过上自己的生活。”

    如果这里还有任何疑问,你的网名后面确实有一个女性,我相信现在这个疑问已经消除了。

    (公平地说,“UR A LOZER”的角度比你在面对 Viktor Frankl 的虚构时高呼“LA LA LA I CANT HEAR YOU”时堵住耳朵要好一点。)

    • 同意: Petermx
    • 谢谢: John Wear
  254. Anon[336]• 免责声明 说:
    @Ron Unz

    You’re being foolish. Just read my two articles:

    . . . surprised you didn’t give the word count on each article – must be brain fog from the deadly Coof.

    • 谢谢: Wizard of Oz
  255. @Colin Wright

    I can pretty much count on being vilified here every time I insist it did in fact happen.

    Ever wonder what you’re doing wrong? Watch and learn:

    Your comment 208 is directed @Sepp, who said to you,
    “You cannot provide any credible evidence for even the low ball 4 million gassed and cremated Jews you are blathering about.”

    Now a good reply would have been to provide evidence for the murder of 6m Jews, or at least 4m.

    But no, you ask three profoundly stupid and off-topic questions of your own. It’s not even a conversation:
    “Pretty average for Holocaust deniers. What is it? Why do you feel entitled to abuse anyone who disagrees with you? Do you see it as a convincing argument?”

    So you “insist it did in fact happen”. Do you see it as a convincing argument?

    • 回复: @Colin Wright
    , @Anon
  256. Sparkon 说:
    @Carolyn Yeager

    Look, I go back to the 1950s too (actually the 1940s), in Illinois, and nothing like “holocaust” or even the war was ever mentioned in school.

    That was my experience too right up until that very strange day in my eighth grade year (1959-1960) when the Dominican nun at my parochial grammar school suddenly and seemingly out of the blue began telling us about the Germans gassing Jews in WWII.

    It took me a long time to figure out what had brought that on.

    你知道, 教皇庇护十二世 had passed away on October 9, 1958. The early voting for his successor was deadlocked for a few days late in October when we were getting timely, ongoing reports about the wait for smoke signals in our daily religion/catechism class.

    I recall everyone was a bit surprised when Cardinal Angelo Giuseppe Roncalli, Patriarch of Venice was elected as the new pope, taking the name Pope John XXIII, but that wasn’t the end of the surprises, as the new Pope, expected by many to be a stop-gap or caretaker pontiff because of his age (77), was soon summoning the Church’s Cardinals and Bishops to Rome for Vatican II, which was to bring many significant changes to the Catholic Church.

    John XXIII’s Wikipedia article includes this morsel:

    After 1944, he played an active role in gaining Catholic Church support for the establishment of the State of Israel.

    Fancy that. His predecessor Pius XII had withstood accusations from some quarters that he was “… a hypocrite who remained silent about the Holocaust.”

    上一篇文章 La Civilità Cattolica in March 2009 indicated that the accusations that Hochhuth’s play [1963] made widely known originated not among Jews but in the Communist bloc. It was on Moscow Radio, on 2 June 1945, that the first accusation directly against Pius XII of refusing to speak out against the exterminations in Nazi concentration camps. [sic] It was also the first medium to call him “Hitler’s Pope”.

    —维基百科

    [My bold and added link to Hochhuth’s play 副手]

    • 谢谢: geokat62
    • 回复: @Carolyn Yeager
    , @Towey
  257. Mehen 说:
    @Johnny Rico

    我读过的大部分历史,而且我读过很多,都涉及 1944 年和 1945 年的实地事实,其中有战斗师指挥官亲眼目睹被遗弃的集中营和党卫军监狱的第一手资料。推进盟友。

    第六百万次:大屠杀怀疑论者的说法并不是说大量犹太人没有死于强迫劳动营(主要是由于斑疹伤寒或由于供应线爆炸而导致的饥饿(当然远不及神秘的“6百万”数字)),但是没有计划故意种族灭绝集中营中的人,并且由于对所涉及的物流有大量科学反对,因此没有“毒气室”,更不用说常识了(为什么不使用子弹等)

    如果您现在还没有像本网站的读者那样深入了解,那么您还有一些阅读要做。 或者你有……其他……动机……

    • 回复: @Anonymous
  258. Anonymous[423]• 免责声明 说:
    @Johnny Rico

    我们的居民新科恩迟到了。

  259. Ron Unz 说:
    @Johnny Rico

    我读过的大部分历史,而且我读过很多,都涉及 1944 年和 1945 年的实地事实,其中有战斗师指挥官亲眼目睹被遗弃的集中营和党卫军监狱的第一手资料。推进盟友。

    好吧,我不是大屠杀方面的专家,但我的强烈印象是,所有所谓的“死亡集中营”都被苏联军队解放了,你提到的那些美国指挥官甚至都没有到达那里。 因此,如果他们在第一手资料中描述他们,他们一定是依靠心灵感应或类似的东西。

    • 哈哈: Mehen
  260. Petermx 说:
    @Johnny Rico

    “I’ve read a lot, that deal with facts on the ground in 1944 and 1945 have first-hand accounts of
    combat division commanders witnessing the camps and SS prisons that were abandoned in the face of advancing allies.” I don’t think anyone denies there were camps. Americans had camps for Japanese too. What happened in those camps is the issue and there has been extensive lying since the war about that. And if you don’t think there is serious research done by highly qualified and educated people that contradicts the many lies the victors told then you don’t know why ten to fifteen European countries have censorship laws about WW II which has seen judges, historians and 92 year olds thrown in jail for writing or discussing history European governments don’t approve of.

    • 同意: HdC
    • 巨魔: Corvinus
  261. anon[350]• 免责声明 说:
    @Sepp

    Way to evaluate the Jewish history narrated by Jews is to look at the way they distort and lie over current events and project their dirty schemings on others . By current ,is meant anytime in history from 1917 to 1947 and from 1947 to 2022 .

  262. @Sparkon

    I went to public schools and probably just squeaked through by graduating H.S. in 1959. Everything started going to hell after that.
    I had cousins in Catholic school and I remember in the early sixties the oldest one sitting at our kitchen table, visiting, and complaining how disappointed he was at the ending of the Latin Mass. Most Catholics didn’t like the Vatican changes but, just like today, had no way to stop what was being done. Everyone loved John the 23rd and had no idea what a jew tool he was! I had no idea of what you quoted from Wikipedia, but it fits. When have the Jews ever stopped meddling in powerful other’s business? They never will.

  263. Anonymous[423]• 免责声明 说:
    @Mehen

    说得很好。 更不用说约翰尼·尼奥康(Johnny Neocon)所指的“历史”无疑是由美国士兵撰写的,而且正如人们普遍认为的那样,西方没有“死亡集中营”。 也许他指的是奥巴马的回忆录,他的叔叔显然曾在红军服役,因为奥巴马声称他帮助“解放”了奥斯威辛(!)。

    • 回复: @Anon
  264. @ivan

    Thanks for the supporting evidence. Jews at that time just wanted to fit into White society; writers wanted to sell their books or movie scripts to the White majority. How times have changed, eh? I’d say most Whites still don’t know what hit them!

  265. @Triteleia Laxa

    陈腐泻药写道:

    Reality is that they [the Palestinians] lost, and have lost for 80 years, and now need to come to terms with that and hope the Israelis generously give them a good deal.

    Of course, how could anyone argue with the magnanimity of the Zionist occupiers in dropping White Phosphorous incendiaries (banned by the Geneva Conventions in warfare) on Palestinian civilians.

    Such generosity.

    Anyway, the U.S hegemon, Israel’s protector and benefactor, is unravelling at the seams.
    As the U.S economy collapses and the U.S dollar loses its reserve currency status, so too will the fortunes of the Apartheid Israeli state.

    Already in 2006, the IDF got their arses kicked by Hezbollah Freedom Fighters and in the interim Hezbollah has become immeasurably stronger.
    Israel’s chief adversary in the region (Iran) is orders of magnitude stronger that Iraq ever was at its peak so no likelihood that the U.S or Israel would dare attack it.

    For the Apartheid Israeli state the noose is tightening.

    Trite Laxative, I would recommend you abandon your cosy abode in Tel Aviv while the going is good and go back to Krakow or wherever it is that your Khazarian forebears came from.

    • 回复: @Anon
  266. Towey 说:
    @Sparkon

    But did he do anything to condemn the mass rape and murder of innocent Germans, including nuns, by the communists hordes that descended from the east that are so graphically described in Germany’s War and Hellstorm?

  267. Anon[407]• 免责声明 说:
    @Truth Vigilante

    The hysteric hate filled diatribe from ‘Trite Laxative’ is most illuminating. It signals how insecure (((these people))) are. Trite Laxative is struggling with the contradiction between what her leaders have been telling her for 100 or so years ( salami tactics, facts on the ground etc ) versus the stark reality.

    The stark reality is the sole internationally recognized boundries of the 2 states remain those borders described in UN resolution 181.

    Until the Trite Laxatives of the world recognize 181, the Jewish state will be precarious and insecure.

    • 同意: Truth Vigilante
  268. Katrinka 说:
    @Carolyn Yeager

    I was raised in Skokie, Illinois, a very jewish community. 80% + of my classmates were jews. I never heard anything whatsoever about gas chambers until the 1970’s (grown up and residing in California). The television series World at War, narrated by Lawrence Olivier, had an episode titled “Genocide”. That was my first exposure to the story about “homicidal gas chambers disguised as shower rooms”. The program contains many false stories and photographic misrepresentations. Of course, I wasn’t aware of that at the time. None of my jewish friends or classmates in Skokie ever mentioned the “final solution”. I was a blonde blue eyed Nordic appearing girl with long braids. No jew ever shied away from me or accused me of “genocide” even though I looked like the typical little German girl you would see in the newsreels prior to WWII. The holocaust is a hoax.

  269. @Sepp

    No, you’re still wrong on the central point. The World Almanac did not conduct any independent study which arrived at a 15.7+ million figure. The World Almanac does not even have the resources to conduct such studies. All of the numbers which The World Almanac ever publishes are just the results of compiling data which has been put together by other sources, such as the American Jewish Yearbook. The 15.7+ million number was never put forward as something derived from postwar data, it was simply a publication of a prewar projected figure. Pretending that it was anything else will always coming out foolish. That is true regardless of what the real world Jewish population of 1945 may have actually been.

    • 回复: @Sepp
    , @Mulegino1
  270. @Mulegino1

    “Removing the danger of communist revolution from Germany.”

    The Communist International had decided in 1928 that the only hope of destroying the Social Democrats and enabling the Communist Party to come to power was to first have the National Socialists take power. This was why the KPD employed such slogans as “After Hitler, our turn!” The Landtag referendum was carried off by the KPD and the NSDAP in alliance against the SPD because parties regarded the Social Democrats as their main enemy.

    As far as Versailles and the economy are concerned, it was Heinrich Bruning who persuaded the Allies to drop the reparations demands through diplomacy. The German economy began recovering in 1932 because of Bruning’s success.

    • 回复: @Fox
    , @Mulegino1
  271. @Katrinka

    Thank you so much for this, Katrinka. Most especially the “No jew ever shied away from me or accused me of “genocide” even though I looked like the typical little German girl you would see in the newsreels prior to WWII.” When the Organized Jewish Lobby got busy ‘developing’ and pushing what they had got started during the war and right after, eventually the “Holocaust” was born. It took awhile because people closer to that time didn’t believe such things (even Jews didn’t) and, like I said before, the Jewish elite weren’t quite as dominant financially and in publishing as they became by the 70s.

    One of the greatest obstacles we now face is growing 审查. Support CODOH! Speak out wherever you can. RESIST mass uniformity.

    • 回复: @Katrinka
  272. @Towey

    It’s possible that Hiroshima was spared earlier bombings because of Catholicism. But the main reason for selecting it as a target for the a-bomb was that it had not been bombed previously. Tokyo had been firebombed already so an a-bombing of Tokyo wouldn’t have demonstrated as much. The USAF was running out of fresh targets by the time the a-bomb became available.

    • 回复: @Sepp
  273. Sepp 说:
    @Patrick McNally

    Au contraire, it is YOU who is still wrong on the central point. During and after the war the World Almanac made new estimates based on the old estimates and any changes that they were made aware of. These changes were small, as was reflected in the small changes in the years between 1933 and 1945. There was enough information during this period for the Almanac to reduce the Protestant population by 70 million, yet the Jewish population remained relatively unchanged, which is consistent with the International Red Cross reports I linked to above that basically confirm than only 100,000-200,000 Jews died at the labor camps.

    More importantly the entire planet accepted these figures until about 1949 when the AJC (American Jewish Congress) started meddling. Interestingly this was after the “Iron Curtain” was constructed dividing Europe in two between the Judeo-Communist half and the Judeo-Capitalist half. 1949 would also have been after the creation of Israel and its recognition by Truman, and the creation of the UN and other Judeo-international organizations, and after the Judeo-Communists took over China and started their murder of untold millions there. In other words, by 1949 Jewish Power had increased immensely.

    So it is important to note that not only was this new World Jewish Power able to get the Almanac to revise their population figures for 1945 down by over 4 million “burned and cremated” death camp victims, but they also coerced the Almanac to increase the Jewish populations figures from 1933, 16 years earlier, by a million, precisely the amount necessary to support their entire “holocaust” narrative.

    So it is once again you, Patrick McNally, the ankle biting Zionist fact checker extraordinaire who is spewing lies in order to support the Wikipedia version of history that never happened. Isn’t time for you to eat some Matza balls?

    • 回复: @Orville H. Larson
  274. Sepp 说:
    @Patrick McNally

    “the main reason for selecting it as a target for the a-bomb was that it had not been bombed previously.”

    The ankle biting oracle of judeo-wikipedia history weighs in once more with another useless and pithy fact check.

    • 同意: Towey
  275. Katrinka 说:
    @Carolyn Yeager

    Thank you Carolyn for your comments concerning my experience. I do what I can and plan to do more and more. I called in on Richard Kary’s program a few days ago. Have a listen. (cue up to 53:30)

    https://www.republicbroadcastingarchives.org/beyond-the-official-narrative-with-richard-kary-january-13-2022/

    • 谢谢: SolontoCroesus, Badger Down
    • 回复: @Carolyn Yeager
  276. Fox 说:
    @Patrick McNally

    布尔什维克继续寻求对抗,暴力对抗,直到希特勒被任命为总理为止。 Horst Wessel 是他们的受害者之一,而国会大厦的大火是一场迟来的企图引发更多暴力的企图。 所以这一切都是共产党的诡计,精心策划并表现出极大的狡猾?
    另一个奇妙的声明是,魏玛共和国的政治终于出现了结果,经济有所改善,凡尔赛勒索者的束缚放松了,他们终于采取措施解除武装,制定了高速公路计划并准备就绪实施等。当然。

    • 同意: Mulegino1
    • 回复: @Patrick McNally
  277. Mulegino1 说:
    @Patrick McNally

    共产国际在 1928 年决定,摧毁社会民主党并使共产党上台的唯一希望是首先让国家社会主义者掌权。 这就是为什么德国共产党使用“希特勒之后,轮到我们了!”这样的口号。

    无论共产国际的意图如何,NSDAP 的政策被证明足以成功地从根本上阻止共产党在德国掌权。

    几乎可以肯定,共产主义计划没有预料到国家社会主义政权会持续 12 年。

    • 回复: @Patrick McNally
  278. Peter VE 说:

    “the Triple Entente of the UK, France, and Russia faced off against the Triple Alliance of Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy.”
    If you can’t get a basic fact like the combatants in the Great War correct, why should we accept the validity of the balance of your article?
    FYI, Italy fought on the side of the Triple Entente, which is why the area of the world once known as the 南蒂罗尔 is currently known as 南蒂罗尔.

    • 回复: @geokat62
  279. Mulegino1 说:
    @Patrick McNally

    《世界年鉴》只是证实了德国人在 1933 年至 1945 年间没有对犹太人进行工业规模种族灭绝的事实。

    6 万人不断变化的叙述足以证明它是错误的。

    战后,英裔美国人“解放”的任何集中营都承认没有“杀人毒气室”,因此浩劫宗教的核心最终转变为据称有 4 万左右的犹太人被杀害。这六个地点的大规模处决/毒气室:

    奥斯威辛 - 比克瑙

    马伊达内克/卢布林

    贝尔策克

    切尔姆诺

    索比堡

    特雷布林卡二世

    没有任何可靠的物证表明数十万人被谋杀,他们的遗体在所​​有这些联合地点被处理,而且有什么真实的文件证据与“工业规模”的种族灭绝叙述相矛盾。

    比克瑙所谓的杀人毒气室以及随后通过大约 52 个普通火葬炉处理遗体——大屠杀传说的核心——已被证明在许多方面都是技术和后勤方面的不可能性,尤其是在“毒气室”(实际上是地下太平间)的砖砌中,没有任何明显的氰化氢与铁结合的痕迹。 相比之下,以适当方式使用 Zyklon-B 的非杀生除虱室显示出大量痕量的氰化铁 - 高达 13,000 ppm。

    奥斯威辛-比克瑙的“官方死亡人数”已从苏联的 4 万减少到大屠杀工业的 1.2 万,但根据实际的集中营记录,奥斯威辛-比克瑙有 67,000 人死于各种原因。 根据所有 150,000 个左右火化炉的终生火化能力,真正的死亡人数可能高达 52 人,但不会更多,而且那里没有任何万人坑或大量人类遗骸的痕迹。

    马伊达内克的死亡人数从苏联宣传的 2 万严重夸大的数字减少到 40,000 人。

    所谓的 800,000 名受害者 Treblinka II 灭绝营很可能从未存在过; 它更可能是被驱逐者或劳工应征者的一个简单的中转站/休息站。 “目击者”的说法完全荒谬; 执行方式 - 柴油机排气 - 根本无法有效工作。 由于据称对巨大的墓坑进行了大规模挖掘,因此营地中没有任何重大地面扰动的痕迹,也没有荒谬的“户外火葬”在铁路枕木上进行。

    海乌姆诺的故事也是假的。 德国人从未制造过杀人的“毒气车”。

    索比堡是一个中转营,旨在将其变成劳改营,以解除敌人的法令。

    贝尔泽克的处决方法最初被描述为“让受害者在带电的地板上踏入水中触电”。

    “子弹大屠杀”似乎是一种备用叙述,但我们确实知道最著名的大规模处决事件——巴比·亚尔——是一种严重的夸张。 发生了反党派报复性枪击事件,但德国人既没有时间、后勤能力也没有意愿出于意识形态或“种族卫生”目的对成千上万的男女老少进行大规模处决和尸体处理。

    所谓的“特别行动报告”往往被苏联人高度修饰,并且经常故意伪造,他们有一个完整的部门从事欺诈性宣传、文件伪造和照片篡改的工作。

    • 同意: Sepp, John Wear, HdC, Towey
  280. Anonymous[138]• 免责声明 说:
    @Mulegino1

    很棒的评论,很好的总结。 值得注意的是,“加油车”的故事最初是针对苏联人在他们自己的战俘营中提出的。 无论他们将自己的罪行归咎于德国人(如卡廷),还是他们使用了一些“逆向”的黑色宣传,这个特殊的故事确实突出了大屠杀神话的完全临时性和任意性。 (虽然我认为汽油车会比手淫机更有效的致命武器。)

    • 谢谢: Mulegino1
  281. @Mulegino1

    Actually Hitler’s policies brought the Soviet Army into Berlin. It was the Social Democrats who made it impossible for the KPD to take power and this was why the line of the Comintern was to let Hitler take power first, crush the Social Democrats, and then look towards the overthrow of Hitler. But you are right that the Comintern was not expecting the German economy to stabilize. They thought the economic crisis would continue and play into their hands.

    实际上,在布鲁宁说服盟军放弃赔款要求后,德国经济在 1932 年开始复苏。像往常一样,首先是金融部门的复苏,然后是工业部门的复苏,这就是为什么德国仍然存在大规模失业的原因。 1933 年 XNUMX 月。出于这个原因,施莱歇尔签署了一项大规模的经济复苏计划,该计划在希特勒的领导下继续进行,没有发生重大变化。

  282. @Mulegino1

    I’ll repeat the obvious here for those who are still slow: The World Almanac did not do any fresh research of its own on Jewish demographics. They simply published for a few years numbers which were earlier projections made before the war of what the world Jewish population would be like if there had been no war. The publication of those numbers is not a verification of anything one way or another. The matter of what was the real world Jewish population in the summer of 1945 has to be taken independently of that figure of 15.7+ million published by The World Almanac in 1948.

    • 回复: @Mulegino1
  283. @Fox

    You’re going way overboard in a comical way by bringing in the Auto-Bahn which only emerged after WWII. But the Allies did quite explicitly yield to Bruning’s argument that Germany could no longer go paying reparations. The KPD probably thought they were being clever when they joined with the NSDAP in the Prussian Landtag referendum to try to dislodge the SPD. But they were caught off guard when Bruning’s getting out of the reparations led to a revival of the economy, even before Schleicher had signed the stimulus bill into law. When the KPD preached their doctrine of “social fascism” (Social Democrats are the real fascists) they were expecting that the economic crisis would be coming to a full boil as Hitler entered office. Instead, the main steps for dealing had already been done and all Hitler had to do was take the credit for Bruning and Schleicher’s achievements.

    • 回复: @Fox
  284. geokat62 说:
    @Peter VE

    FYI, Italy fought on the side of the Triple Entente…

    Here’s the fuller picture:

    Although a member of the Triple Alliance, Italy did not join the Central Powers – Germany and Austria-Hungary – when the war started on 28 July 1914…

    Almost a year after the war’s commencement, after secret parallel negotiations with both sides (with the Allies in which Italy negotiated for territory if victorious, and with the Central Powers to gain territory if neutral) Italy entered the war on the side of the Allied Powers.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_history_of_Italy_during_World_War_I

  285. @Katrinka

    I enjoyed listening to your call-in, Katrinka. It was very, very bold, what you did, and do apparently, where you live. The characters on the radio show you called into were at a loss. I’ll say this: Places like RBN would fold if more of us did what you’re proposing, and doing, because they exist only for the fact that people want to ‘secretly’ hear the ‘truth’ talked about on radio talk shows and video channels. It doesn’t translate into ‘real life’ out in the open. Of course, censorship is real, but so is cowardice and fear of drawing too much attention to oneself. We have to get past that. Look at how brave & bold Adolf Hitler was. Maybe reading his 1920 speech “Why We are Antisemites” 会有所帮助。 https://carolynyeager.net/why-we-are-antisemites-text-adolf-hitlers-1920-speech-hofbr%C3%A4uhaus

    It does require that one is sure of their facts and won’t be flummoxed by other’s counter statements. But there is so much that can be said and pointed to our our society in a respectful way. With all this open talk now that every white person is a White Supremacist, the term Jewish Supremacist should be equally acceptable. There is a lot that can be said without sounding “hateful.” Just listing facts and realities in the way of statistics. But you will still be smeared as an “anti-Semite.”

    Congratulations on your strong showing. You clearly have a first-class spine and know how to stand up for yourself.

    • 回复: @Katrinka
  286. Mulegino1 说:
    @Patrick McNally

    我不相信《世界年鉴》的编辑会忽视 1948 年版数百万犹太人的死亡,因为这会构成重大的统计错误。

    国际犹太团体对公布的数字有任何同期反对意见吗?

    • 回复: @Ron Unz
  287. Katrinka 说:
    @Mulegino1

    很好的总结。

    我还要补充一点,德国人保留了严格的记录。 奥斯威辛-比克瑙集中营的记录并未表明曾将燃烧数百万(甚至数千)具尸体所需的焦炭(煤灰)量运送到集中营。

    从未发现用于存储的大规模结构。 煤灰必须储存在室内,因为在生产液体燃料的过程中,大部分挥发性成分已从煤中去除。 如果暴露在雪或雨中,它不会燃烧。 剩下的就是煤灰。

    这一事实是我个人调查这段时间真正发生的事情的核心。

    • 谢谢: Mulegino1
  288. Katrinka 说:
    @Carolyn Yeager

    Thank you. I respect you and your work very much.

    And, yes. Adolph Hitler was out with the people.

    We must get out of the shadows. We have the truth!

  289. @John Wear

    It is so “easily disprovable” that you have proven nothing to me and have, in fact, proven nothing to the vast majority of people in the world. You have lost this “easily provable” argument for 80 years and each year it only gets more unlikely that you will win. From 0.0001% to 0.00001% etc.

    要么这个论点很难证明,要么你和你身边的人完全可悲, 丑恶 白痴。 或者两者的某种混合。 否则如何解释事实如何真实存在于人们发现向他们证明而不向他们证明的事实?

    And I know you probably have some alternative “explanations” that neither require you to be wrong nor repulsive, but spare me the psychosis and come back to reality.

    • 回复: @Fox
    , @John Wear
  290. Fox 说:
    @Triteleia Laxa

    De-fang the media (i.e., make them independent and owned by more than the few multi-billionaires) and the associated power web that is reaching into every aspect of life and you will suddenly find that the ‘6 million’ and the associated fables find no more audience because the endless re-cycling will come to an end.
    You are boasting with arrogance.

    • 同意: John Wear, HdC
  291. John Wear 说:
    @Triteleia Laxa

    我们的大众媒体、教育和政治体系在很大程度上受到犹太复国主义/犹太人利益的控制。 这就是为什么大多数人仍然相信官方的大屠杀叙述。

    您可能想返回阅读 Mulegino295 的第 1 条评论。 这是对官方大屠杀故事中一些问题的简要总结。

    • 同意: Mehen
    • 不同意: Corvinus
    • 回复: @Mehen
  292. Ron Unz 说:
    @Mulegino1

    我不相信《世界年鉴》的编辑会忽视 1948 年版数百万犹太人的死亡,因为这会构成重大的统计错误。

    我认为引用 1948 年《世界年鉴》中的犹太人口数据作为揭穿大屠杀的有力证据是荒谬和荒谬的,并且让那些这样做的人看起来非常愚蠢。 随机年历几乎不是最可靠的来源,考虑到它包含的数百万个数字,它大概每隔几年才更新一次,基于一些更权威的来源。

    然而,更重要的一点是,大约在同一时期,主要的主流历史学家,包括德国犹太移民难民,根据他们发表的著作和公开演讲,似乎完全不相信大屠杀的存在。 事实上,一位著名的犹太历史学家的一次公开演讲让年轻的劳尔·希尔伯格感到震惊,以至于他决定把这个主题作为他感兴趣的焦点,并最终在几十年后创立了大屠杀研究学科:

    https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-holocaust-denial/#the-rediscovery-of-the-holocaust

    我非常怀疑这些著名的历史学家忽视或忽视了大屠杀,因为他们认为这只是战时的宣传,很快就会像第一次世界大战后的情况一样被揭穿,他们不想让自己在人们的心目中看起来很可笑未来的读者。

    • 同意: Mulegino1
    • 回复: @Mulegino1
    , @Cheers Babes
    , @Sepp
  293. Mulegino1 说:
    @Ron Unz

    我非常怀疑这些著名的历史学家忽视或忽视了大屠杀,因为他们认为这只是战时的宣传,很快就会像第一次世界大战后的情况一样被揭穿,他们不想让自己在人们的心目中看起来很可笑未来的读者。

    我当然同意这一点,因为“大屠杀”宣传和反德国暴行宣传之间的相似之处是惊人的,这一点从英国独立报的一篇文章中可以看出:

    事后看来,外交部对暴行持惊人的怀疑态度。 直到 27 年 1944 月 XNUMX 日,助理副部长维克多·卡文迪什·本廷克仍然怀疑毒气室的存在。 “我认为我们通过公开相信我们没有证据的暴行故事来削弱我们对德国人的指控。

    “这些在毒气室中的大规模处决让我想起了在上一次(1914-18 年)战争期间使用人类尸体制造脂肪的故事,这是一个荒谬的谎言,导致德国暴行的真实故事被置之不理.

    作为自针对西班牙帝国的“Leyenda Negra”时代以来的暴行宣传大师,英国人一看到就知道了。

  294. @Al Liguori

    jews may have been lieing about things for 1000’s of years, though the “jews” we are concerned with today are nothing more than west asian yiddish gypsies, who’s ancestors all “converted” to judiasm within the last 800 years, yiddish gypsies are no more jews than a transgender is the opposite sex.

    • 不同意: Wizard of Oz
  295. @Ron Unz

    我们今天关心的“犹太人”无非是西亚的意第绪吉普赛人,他们的祖先在过去 800 年里都“皈依”了犹太教,意第绪吉普赛人不再是犹太人,就像变性人是异性一样。

    • 哈哈: Wizard of Oz
  296. Mehen 说:
    @John Wear

    是的,Triteleia 确实应该重新审视评论 #295,因为它是对修正主义立场的一个很好的总结。

    我当然假设她是善意的。

    所以,就是这样。

    • 同意: John Wear
  297. Sarita 说:

    The thing here Is not that the Jews LIE about the Holocaust BUT that no leader in the western world dares say a single word nor ask a single question.
    They all wear the Kippa and visit the wall and the holocaust museum.
    Even your heroe Putin who has killed more Muslims than HITLER DID Jews.

    谁更惨?

  298. Corvinus 说:

    ——一份保存在美国国家档案馆并于上周解密的英国情报文件显示,在“最秘密的”英国消息来源“窃取”了一位狂热的亲纳粹智利外交官在布拉格……美国国家档案馆的历史学家理查德·布莱特曼教授说:“这无疑是我们掌握的最早的证据,表明英国和美国被警告即将到来的种族灭绝。 它比英国邮政和电报审查办公室的报告早几个月,该报告声称纳粹计划灭绝犹太人——

    ——莫里斯的电影《死亡先生:小弗雷德·洛赫特的兴衰》在这部电影中,可以看到洛赫特从墙壁、地板和天花板上随意挖出大块砖块和混凝土。 有一次,他甚至从他声称是毒气室的地板上的一滩融化的雪中收集了大块的砖块和混凝土。 它不是毒气室,而是来自火化炉区。 [4] 每块拳头大小的砖块或混凝土都被磨成粉末进行分析。 这提出了另一个问题。 任何可能存在的 HCN 残留物的微小痕迹都成为较大样本中更微不足道的部分。 更合适的方法是只测试样品的表面。 然而,实验室并未获悉这些样本的分析目的。 因此,实验室对整个样本进行了分析。

    ——欧文是一个有缺陷但迷人的角色。 英国历史学家 AJP Taylor 于 1978 年称欧文为档案研究“无与伦比的工业”和“良好的学术”的作者。 泰勒以历史判断批评欧文的双重标准,以欧文声称没有书面元首命令证明希特勒不知道大屠杀,同时声称缺乏书面命令证明丘吉尔下令据称谋杀了西科尔斯基将军。

    ——在对欧文的《丘吉尔的战争》(1988)一书的评论中,大卫·坎纳丁批评了欧文的“证据双重标准”,指责欧文“要求绝对的文件证据来证明德国人有罪(就像他试图证明希特勒不对大屠杀),同时依靠间接证据谴责英国(如他对盟军轰炸德累斯顿的描述)”

    他还说安妮·弗兰克的日记是假的。 有哪些具体证据可以反驳荷兰法医研究所通过法医文件分析得出的关于她的日记是真实的结论? 他说他不能接受亚历山大·索尔仁尼琴关于死亡集中营的著作和目击者的叙述,因为索尔仁尼琴是一位小说家,没有接受过历史方法的训练。 用福里松自己的逻辑,我们是否应该拒绝他的发现,因为他是一个同样缺乏这种技能的诗人? Faurisson 还要求对前大屠杀幸存者或前德国士兵进行交叉询问,但这是一种合法的方法,而不是历史方法。 他奇怪的要求怎么不虚伪?——

    ——考虑一下,我们有来自数十次审判的党卫军和盖世太保男子的证词,他们明确表示犹太人是在毒气室中被处死的。 他们作证说,制造商的记录显示发往奥斯威辛集中营的齐克隆 B 订单超出了熏蒸所需的数量。 在那些审判中,盘问是内置的。大多数人自愿提供他们的证词。 那么,有什么证据可以最终证明每个人都在撒谎或不准确呢?

    是什么让 Faurisson、Leuchter 和 Irving 看起来无可非议?

  299. @Sarita

    西方世界没有一个领导人敢说一个字,也不敢问一个问题。

    非常正确。 那是更重要的问题或问题 需求 an answer. The rest is just recycled old news. It’s certainly not because they all believe it after weighing the evidence!!

    • 回复: @Mehen
  300. Pat Kittle 说:
    @Corvinus

    (((哈斯巴拉巨魔))):

    我们需要知道的关于你的一切:

    你很高兴欧洲人现在在监狱里,仅仅因为质疑(((你的二战版本)))。

    如果你真的相信你的“大屠杀”寓言,你会欢迎它的调查——而不是对调查人员的监禁。

    ((((胆小鬼。战犯。)))

    • 同意: John Wear, HdC, anarchyst
  301. Mehen 说:
    @Carolyn Yeager

    你把太多的代理权归咎于那些领导人。

    这就是问题。

    你认为每个人都和你一样自由思考。

    所以你认为他们有邪恶的动机

    但这不是人类的工作方式。

    这提醒我,大多数修正主义者需要好好上一堂“营销”课。

    我最初反对大多数“修正主义”理论,因为我看到了太多“骗局!!!” 术语。

    对于普通人来说,修正主义者正在按照“什么都没发生”的方式提出荒谬的主张

    在任何改变之前,修正主义者社区确实需要对转换“规范”所涉及的细微差别有更多的了解。

    因为——如果你在基本层面上不了解你的同胞——你永远不会推进你的目标。

    • 回复: @Carolyn Yeager
  302. JR Foley 说:
    @Bookish1

    Same today —the Natives and rightful owners of USA have been shunted to the sidelines. Today in Texas some long-overdue action with a hostage-taking at synagogue —all for the Public viewing—inside job—makes for ringside entertainment for a nation too stupid to think.

  303. Petermx 说:
    @Corvinus

    “—A British intelligence document held in the US National Archives and declassified last week shows that Great Britain was warned about Hitler’s plans for the Jews after ‘a most secret’ British source ‘poached’ diplomatic cables written by a fanatically pro-Nazi Chilean diplomat in Prague…”

    哈哈。 他们应该将这些计划通知希特勒和他的政府,因为他们无处可寻。 也许他实际上是一个狂热的支持犹太布尔什维克的人,为当时正在传播的大规模犹太宣传做出了贡献。

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  304. Petermx 说:
    @Corvinus

    “—Consider we have the testimony of SS and Gestapo men from dozens of trials who were explicit that Jews were put to death in gas chambers. ” The confessions they were forced to sign while being tortured were explicit and those that gave that testimony at the “Auschwitz Trials” in the early 1960’s were released from jail after about 3 years after being convicted of mass murder. Apparently the trials were a hoax too.

    • 同意: Carolyn Yeager
    • 回复: @Petermx
  305. @Katrinka

    我们应该很幸运。

    It was given a deep stab wound. The bleeding continues till today. The beast will expire sooner or later. But certainly sooner if they continue to stupidly poke the bear again.

    Edgar Cayce one predicted that “Russia would save the world”. I wonder if he meant Stalingrad 1942 or Ukraine 2022?

    • 回复: @Robjil
  306. anonymous[118]• 免责声明 说:
    @Rich

    It all boils down to which race of humans are the greater psychopaths.

    The accursed whitevil race has amply shown, they are the masters of plunder and slaughter.

  307. 对于那些认为大屠杀是骗局的人,我有一个问题。

    你也相信新疆的集中营和种族灭绝营是真的吗?

  308. @Katrinka

    We’re birds of a feather Katrinka.
    I too was first exposed to the Holohoax through the British TV series ‘World at War’ in the early 70’s.

    • 回复: @Katrinka
  309. anonymous[118]• 免责声明 说:
    @KenH

    6 月 XNUMX 日的武装白人至上主义勃起

    Given how impotent whitevil supremacists are at accomplishing anything of value (e.g. said terrorist uprising), you flaccid vermin obviously don’t get erections.

  310. Petermx 说:
    @Petermx

    “How the British Obtained the Confessions of Rudolf Höss, commandant of Auschwitz-

    Rudolf Höss was the first of three successive commandants of the Auschwitz concentration camp. He is often called “the Auschwitz Commandant”, and the general public may know of writings of his as published under the title Commandant of Auschwitz (in German: Kommandant in Auschwitz: Autobiographische Aufzeichnungen des Rudolf Höss). He appeared as a witness before the International Military Tribunal (IMT) in Nuremberg on April 15, 1946. His testimony caused a sensation. To the astonishment of the defendants and in the presence of the world press, he confessed to the most ghastly crimes that History had ever known. He told of having personally received the order from Himmler to exterminate the Jews. He estimated that at Auschwitz three million persons had been exterminated, two and a half million of them in homicidal gas chambers. Those confessions were false. They had been extorted from him by torture. It took until 1983 for the identity of the torturers and the nature of the tortures to be known.”

    Revelations in 1983 about Rudolf Höss’s British torturers

    “The revisionists proved long ago that the various confessions of Rudolf Höss presented so many gross errors, nonsensical elements and impossibilities of all kinds that it was no longer possible to lend them the credence that the judges at Nuremberg and Cracow – as well as some casual historians – had, without prior analysis of their content or the circumstances in which they had been obtained, lent them.

    In all likelihood Höss had been tortured by the British of the 92nd Field Security Section. But a confirmation of that hypothesis was needed. Confirmation was to come with the publication of a book containing the name of the main torturer (a British sergeant of Jewish origin) and describing the circumstances both of Höss’s arrest and of his third-degree interrogation.

    The book is by Rupert Butler. It was published in 1983 (Hamlyn Paperbacks, Feltham, England). Butler is the author of three other works: The Black Angels, Hand of Steel and Gestapo, all from the same publisher. What interests us here is his Legions of Death…At the start of this book he expresses gratitude to these institutions and, moreover, to two persons, one of whom is a “Jew” called Bernard Clarke, “who captured Auschwitz Commandant Rudolf Höss”, and of whom he quotes some fragments of writings or recorded speech.

    Bernard Clarke feels no remorse but, on the contrary, rather a certain pride in having tortured a “Nazi”. Nor does Rupert Butler, for his part, see anything wrong in that. Neither of the two gauges the import of their revelation. They say that Höss was arrested on March 11, 1946 and that three days of torture were needed to obtain “a coherent statement”. They seem not to realise that this alleged “coherent statement” is nothing but a truly mad confession, signed by the gasping torture victim on the 14th or 15th of March 1946 at 2.30 in the morning, a statement which was to seal his fate definitively and mark forever the history of the myth of Auschwitz, the alleged grand centre for the extermination of the Jews especially by means of alleged homicidal gas chambers.

    On March 11, 1946 Clarke and five other intelligence agents in British uniform, for the most part tall and threatening-looking, entered the home of Mrs Höss and her children. The six men, we are told, were all “practised in the more sophisticated techniques of sustained and merciless investigation”. Clarke started shouting:

    If you don’t tell us [where your husband is] we’ll turn you over to the Russians and they’ll put you before a firing-squad. Your son will go to Siberia [5].”

    Read the whole article by Robert Faurisson here:

    http://robertfaurisson.blogspot.com/1987/05/how-british-obtained-confessions-of.html

    • 同意: John Wear, HdC
  311. @Corvinus

    In relation to the autopsies done by the British at Bergen-Belsen that showed not a single individual died from gassing, read this:

    https://ww2truth.com/2021/06/05/british-doctor-states-that-corpses-at-bergen-belsen-did-not-die-in-gas-chambers-because-there-were-no-gas-chambers/

    Secondly, I suggest you listen to what the greatest WWII historian that ever lived, none other than David Irving, has to say in his various educational seminars and lectures.
    These videos used to all be accessible on You Tube but the vast majority have been purged from there by the Zio management.

    Fortunately, BitChute to the rescue:

    https://www.bitchute.com/search/?query=david%20irving&kind=video

    In several of his videos Irving states, after meticulous research of the British archives (no historian living or dead is even remotely in Irving’s league as far as the sheer volume of primary source material he’s trawled through), confirms that amongst the countless autopsies performed of the dead inmates in those camps liberated by the British, none died from gassing.

    • 同意: Katrinka
    • 谢谢: Ann Nonny Mouse
    • 回复: @Corvinus
  312. anonyms 说:
    @Triteleia Laxa

    我们这里有什么,现代弗洛伊德,嗯?

    Reading your nonsense one would get the impression that non-muslim men are never the misogynists, and treat their women like queens, when in fact these pimps treat their women like sluts, just as their sexually degenerate societies have raised them all up to be. Don’t we know the iron grip the juden have over the porn industry. 😉

    As far as Palestinians having lost… I agree. They are powerless, and they have lost… for now. The only thing they have is time, and the promise of Divine Justice, which will no doubt come.

    But, have the evil “israhellis” truly won? These juden vermin sit amidst peoples who will forever be their implacable enemies… the enemies who ever so slowly become stronger.

    当juden傍大款足够无能时,上帝愿意,那么你们这些mofers/fafers也会迷失方向。

    • 回复: @Triteleia Laxa
  313. @Corvinus

    Much proof was furnished during the Zundel trial in Toronto in 1985 that substantiated that those among the dead at Bergen-Belsen had NOT died from gassing or deliberate starvation:

    https://codoh.com/library/document/the-liberation-of-the-camps-facts-vs-lies/en/

    从上面的文章:

    Dr. Gordon’s findings are corroborated by Dr. Russell Barton, today a psychiatrist of international repute, who entered Bergen-Belsen with British forces as a young medical student in 1945.
    Barton, who volunteered to care for the diseased survivors, testified under sworn oath in a Toronto courtroom in 1985 that “Thousands of prisoners who died at the Bergen-Belsen concentration camp during WWII weren’t deliberately starved to death but died from a rash of diseases, according to a psychiatrist who was there in 1945.

    Corvanus, you would do well to read up on what this individual had to say as far as the cause of death of those found at these alleged ‘death camps’:

    James Johnston, the British lieutenant colonel who was appointed senior medical officer at Bergen-Belsen.

    From another article at 科多网:

    The notorious Bergen-Belsen concentration camp where 50,000 inmates were supposedly murdered. Actually, about 7,000 inmates died during the period when the camp existed, from 1943 to 1945. Most of them died in the final months of the war as a result of disease and malnutrition – consequences of the bombings that had completely disrupted normal deliveries of medical supplies and food.

    • 谢谢: HdC
    • 回复: @Corvinus
  314. @Sarita

    Neither is as nassty as you Miss ‘Little Commenting History’.

  315. Sepp 说:
    @Ron Unz

    The World Almanac and Encyclopedia Britannica were the “fact checkers” of their day. One could easily argue that they were far better “strong evidence” 然后比今天的维基百科或snopes。 声称引用它们是 “absurd and ridiculous, and makes those who do it look very foolish.” 就是它本身 “absurd and ridiculous”.

    当然,列出的数字只是估计值 “updated every few years, based upon some more authoritative source”, but the important point is that if there had been an “authoritive source” at the time, the numbers would have reflected that source.

    In the case of the world wide Jewish population what is important is that the World Almanac RETROACTIVELY adjusted the figures under pressure from the AJC is what I would consider to be “strong evidence” that the holocaust was faked. Even stronger evidence was that not only did they retroactively adjust the 1945 Jewish population estimates down in 1949, 他们还追溯调整了 1933 年的人口估计数,在事实发生 1 年后上调了近 16 万。 在这两种情况下,他们都没有为这些更改提供任何理由。 所有这些手帕很明显是为全息欺诈叙事提供掩护。

    正如我在上面的评论中所写的那样,这不仅是 Holofraud 的吸烟枪,也是犹太权力的等级腐败。

    • 同意: Arthur MacBride
  316. John Wear 说:
    @Corvinus

    You state: “A more appropriate method would have tested only the surfaces of the samples.”

    My response: This is a false statement. I recommend reading the article at https://www.inconvenienthistory.com/9/4/5160 获取更多信息.

  317. Anonymous[351]• 免责声明 说:
    @littlereddot

    I have a question for you: do you have even the foggiest idea what this debate is about? (Actually no need to ask, the answer is clearly “no”.)

    • 回复: @littlereddot
  318. Katrinka 说:
    @Truth Vigilante

    My theory is that the BBC was largely controlled by jewish influence by the 1970’s. Here is the actual episode. There are many photographic falsifications and sketchy testimonies. Prepare yourself.

    • 回复: @Truth Vigilante
    , @Towey
  319. @Yukon Jack

    Western civilization died at Dunkirk when Hitler let the English army return home.

  320. Robjil 说:
    @littlereddot

    It is 2022. He made the prediction in 1944, so Stalingrad was in the past. “He mentions not Bolshevik. Freedom, Freedom. That each man will live for his fellow man. ” The Worst ( the former west) does not have much freedom these days. It does not care for the fellow man at all. Russia is a light these days.

    https://www.wakingtimes.com/80-years-ago-edgar-cayce-predicted-putins-role-in-stopping-ww3/

    Cayce spoke of Russia’s role as being the ‘hope of the world’ in a coming time such as this:

    “In Russia there comes the hope of the world, not as that sometimes termed of the communistic, or Bolshevik, no; but freedom, freedom! That each man will live for his fellow man! The principle has been born. It will take years for it to be crystallised, but out of Russia comes again the hope of the world.”
    (Edgar Cayce, 1944, No. 3976-29)

    • 谢谢: littlereddot
  321. Ron Unz 说:
    @littlereddot

    对于那些认为大屠杀是骗局的人,我有一个问题。

    你也相信新疆的集中营和种族灭绝营是真的吗?

    Ha, ha, ha—you’re finally starting to notice a few things…

    The people spouting off about the “Uyghur Genocide” in China every morning in my “纽约时报” 与二战期间曾经和正在大肆宣扬纳粹种族灭绝的人完全相同。

    If you haven’t already done so, you really should read my lengthy analysis of the true history of the Second World War:

    https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-understanding-world-war-ii/

    One crucial difference was that since America was so vastly larger in size and resources than Germany, the outcome was largely determined once our country was able to provoke the war despite overwhelming popular opposition. However, I’d say that China+Russia is probably stronger than America and its decaying vassals, so even leaving aside nuclear risks, our elites are behaving in a very stupid manner in trying to provoke a conflict. But they’re stupid, so we should be surprised.

  322. Petermx 说:
    @Katrinka

    I saw The World at War many years ago when it first came out and I recollect clearly when I heard of the genocide/Holocaust and it is exactly as you said, in the early 1970’s. I talked with my parents when the subject was discussed in school and I clearly remember it being in all the media constantly for many years. I think I finally just stopped paying attention to it by the 1990’s. I recall my German immigrant mother saying “this country has changed”. I found it interesting that my German immigrant parents liked the USA better in the 50’s and 60’s than after that. Usually, wounds are healed between peoples and countries as more years pass since the end of a war, or that is what you would think. But they were also aware who was responsible for what was being done.

    Norman Finkelstein says the Holocaust and later The Holocaust Industry (extorting money from European countries) only started after the 1967 war between Israel and the Arab countries. The Jews were emboldened by their victory over the Arabs and many may have not wanted to stick out previously. But with a big victory and being very powerful in the USA, they were no longer concerned about that any more and made themselves the ultimate victims and profited greatly from The Holocaust Industry.

    Another watershed was the TV miniseries Holocaust in 1978. It was very upsetting to me to watch those programs but I watched all of them. Another one was QB VII. All these programs began airing in the 1970’s.

    • 回复: @Colin Wright
  323. @Katrinka

    谢谢卡特琳卡。

    I didn’t know 50 years ago what I know now, so I wasn’t in a position to critically analyse what was being said in that documetary.

    现在看着它,大约 45 分钟的那个人说,他们一次可以让两千(2000)人进入所谓的毒气室。 后来,他说火化每具尸体需要15分钟。
    Obviously he had been fed these numbers by some entity that wanted to perpetuate the myth because it was the only way they could make the numbers work – seeing as four of the alleged 6 million were supposed to have been killed in Auschwitz.

    Even a modern cremation, with far more sophisticated and efficient ovens, takes an hour or so for a body to be burned. Yet, we’re supposed to believe that the primitive ovens of yesteryear could do it in 15 minutes (and that 2000 people could fit in a chamber that was no larger than a few modest sized rooms in an average house).

    在大约 52 分钟的时候,上面提到的同一个人说:

    ‘When the Americans entered, I weighed 42kg, I was skin and bones’.

    Well then, he can’t have been in Auschwitz. Since it was the Americans that did the liberating, it had to have been Buchenwald, Dachau or one of the others like Flossenburg.

    不过需要注意的重要一点是,德国政府和犹太全息恶作剧历史学家现在承认,美国人或英国人解放的这些集中营中从来没有毒气室。 (并不是说东部的任何营地都有毒气室,但至少我们有犹太人自己的让步,即西欧营地从未配备过上述毒气设施)。

    底线:这个声称协助并观察到犹太人被毒死的家伙是最高级别的秃头骗子。

    BTW, I know your name isn’t spelled this way but nevertheless, you may get something out of this called ‘Kalinka’ – sung by the Red Army Choir (make sure the volume is well up):

    • 回复: @Patrick McNally
    , @Mulegino1
  324. @Mehen

    I don’t know you, but the very few comments of yours I’ve read on this thread lead me to conclude that you are a middle-of-the-road person who, 也许, is even trying to pass as someone open-minded about the “Hoax” but whose real agenda is to dismiss revisionists who are actually getting closest to the heart of the matter. Like myself.

    People want truth; they don’t want marketing. Belief in the Holocaust story is diminishing and will soon reach a critical point. Neither time, nor “the times”, is on your side.

    Just restricting myself to what you’ve said in comment #319, it is pure 意见 based on a pseudo-psychological rather than factual foundation. You resist facts because facts do not support your frivolous arguments. Therefore, there’s nothing to reply to.

    • 回复: @Mehen
  325. HdC 说:
    @littlereddot

    An old ditty would have “Believe nothing you hear and half of what you read”.
    Unfortunately it doesn’t state which half of the written word to believe.

    As to Germany and WWI & II: I submit that whatever one sees/reads/hears in the mass media about those truly tragic times, the exact opposite is much nearer to the truth.

    • 谢谢: littlereddot
  326. Those ingenious devils, the Nazis, managed to destroy all the evidence—including the physical remains of virtually all six million Jewish corpses

    And the six million goy corpses. For some reason, we always forget about those.

  327. Towey 说:
    @Katrinka

    The BBC has been controlled by the Jews since its inception. Just like the UK has been controlled by them since well before the establishment of the Bank of England when they managed to depose the rightful king James, who would, like the Russian Tsars, have been against the establishment of a central bank and replace him with the Protestant usurper, William.
    The Protestant Reformation in England and Ireland by William Cobbett, a Protestant, is a good source of information.

    • 谢谢: Katrinka
  328. @Truth Vigilante

    “four of the alleged six million were supposed to have been killed at Auschwitz.”

    Wrong. While the USSR still existed the Auschwitz management maintained a plaque which referred to an alleged 4 million victims without saying anything about Jews. But Raul Hilberg had always placed the number of Jewish deaths at Auschwitz at around 1 million. Now there certainly is no reason to place immediate stock in this number simply because it comes from Hilberg. But if one wants to be debunking the orthodox Holocaust story as it has been developed in the West then the issue of what an old Soviet plaque had on it is not very significant.

  329. @Sepp

    The World Almanac has never been a fact checker. They are a fact compiler. They put together large swaths of data which are taken from sources such as the American Jewish Yearbook and others. But the editors of The World Almanac have never even attempted to conduct any independent research in something like world Jewish demographics on their own.

  330. Anon[156]• 免责声明 说:
    @Ron Unz

    How strongly and how deeply are ISIS integrated to this agenda of destabilizing China ? It seems the major players – Saudi , UAE , Pakistan and Qatar aren’t keen to re -employ and resend them to a new address . That’s a lot of unemployed land
    based pirates . Too many of them to wander around .
    Without them US has no chance of stirring the pot .

    India is supporting insurgency against Myanmar military supported by China and Russia .
    South China Sea lapping the shores of Philippines, Indonesia and Vietnam possibly offer better locations to hamstrung China .

  331. anon[335]• 免责声明 说:
    @Corvinus

    如果您仍然相信大屠杀胡说八道,请阅读以下内容:

    1-战时领导人艾森豪威尔和戴高乐写的二战后书籍从未提及使用任何毒气或任何有计划、有系统地消灭任何人,也没有提及数百万甚至数十万人死亡。 如果发生大规模杀戮,艾森豪威尔和戴高乐完全有理由提到它,因为任何与德国交战的理由都受到盟军的追捧和欢迎。 除此之外,艾森豪威尔和戴高乐都对德国人没有任何同情。 此外,在丘吉尔名为“第二次世界大战”的六卷巨著中,他没有提到任何毒气室,也没有提到对犹太人的种族灭绝或战争中的 2 万犹太人受害者。 丘吉尔在次要经济问题上花费的时间比在犹太人身上花费的时间更多。

    2-在伊莱·威塞尔 (Eli Wiesel) 的《夜晚》一书中,他写道,当苏联军队逼近时,他正在奥斯威辛集中营医院接受脚痛治疗。 如果这是一个死亡集中营,我不得不问一个犹太人在奥斯威辛的一家医院里做什么? 此外,他没有提到使用了毒气,当他选择与德国人一起撤退或留在苏联的保护伞下时,他选择与德国人一起撤退,那是在他声称目睹了德国人的杀戮之后犹太人。 现在他声称德国人杀害了数百万犹太人。

    3-在杜鲁门总统在第二次世界大战结束四个月后发表的“国情咨文”中,他提到了这场战争的许多细节,但他从未提及犹太人或大屠杀。

    [更多]

    4-如果有数百万人被谋杀,那么就会有成吨的人类遗骸被埋在某个地方,而且要隐藏很长时间就太过分了。 没有发现成吨的人类遗骸。 如果他们被火化,那么就会有成吨的骨灰,而且从来没有发现过成吨的骨灰。

    5-1947年联合国对犹太人的世界人口数字与国际联盟1938年对犹太人的世界人口数字几乎相同。 1941年世界年历汇编的数据证实了这一点,该数据显示犹太人的世界人口为15,748,091,1947年世界年鉴显示的犹太人世界人口为15,688,289。

    6-当时的标准政策是,红十字会人员在所有营地都派驻,以便他们可以定期报告营地内的情况。 没有红十字会人员报告过任何囚犯被杀的情况,更不用说大规模杀戮任何人了。

    7- 迄今为止,关于这些营地中死亡人数的最官方报告是由红十字会发布的。 1947 年红十字会的报告显示,在整个战争期间,所有集中营中共有 271、301 人死亡,其中 40% 是犹太人,其中大多数死于斑疹伤寒。

    8-在我们国家档案馆中没收的大量德国文件中,没有任何文件描述了大屠杀的计划,尽管德国人一丝不苟地记录了他们军事活动和战役的每一个细节。

    9-在考虑大屠杀问题时,最终会被问到为什么在 1940 年代后期以及整个 1950 和 1960 年代,所谓的犹太人大屠杀不是问题。 政治家、学者、文学杂志或任何其他来源的电视都没有提到我们现在称之为大屠杀的那场惊天动地的事件。 在大街上和学校里,人们不会讨论犹太人在大屠杀中遭受的苦难。 这完全不是问题。 然后突然在 1970 年代初期,经过多年的非问题,大量的宣传从多个方向传来,声称犹太人是一种独特迫害的受害者,他们以工业方式被带入毒气室并被毒死。那些邪恶的纳粹分子造成数百万人死亡。 当然,大多数人现在都知道或至少怀疑这些疯狂的说法是不正确的,而事实是修正主义历史学家和研究人员用确凿的证据驳斥了这些疯狂的说法。 但是,这种宣传犹太人受难的路线在电影和戏剧、各种文学期刊、报纸和杂志文章、纪录片、讲座中被大力推动,甚至在我们的学校系统中被制度化,小学要求开设关于大屠杀的课程和高中。 但是有些事情并没有正确联系,因为在 1940 年代到 1970 年代期间肯定会发生像大屠杀这样大的事件。 众所周知,在那段时间里,我们可以向那些所谓的受害者保证,不会等到 1970 年代才提出他们的迫害主张并领取他们的利益。 这个谜题的唯一合乎逻辑的结论是,大屠杀只是一个故事,一个没有事实支持的故事。

    10-有句老话是这样说的:“真理不需要辩护”。 所以我们不得不问,为什么 25 个欧洲国家将否认大屠杀定为犯罪,并由严格的法律强制执行。 如果真相站在灭绝者一边,他们为什么要呼吁将任何不同意他们的大屠杀信仰的人定为犯罪。 他们所要做的就是向大屠杀否认真相的人表明,一切都会在没有争议的情况下得到解决。 但灭绝主义者没有站在他们这边的真相,这就是他们对任何不同意他们的人使用武力的原因。 紧随其后的是另一句话:“唯一害怕真相的人是骗子”。 在绝望中,灭绝主义者将否认大屠杀与仇恨犯罪联系起来,以确保对否认者进行惩罚。 他们的恐惧和绝望现在很容易被观察到,因为他们看到近年来否认大屠杀的人数呈指数级增长。 人们相信大屠杀的日子已经屈指可数,而且正在迅速消退。
    https://www.stormfront.org/forum/t553062/

    • 同意: Mulegino1
    • 谢谢: mark green, John Wear, Mehen
    • 回复: @HdC
    , @Corvinus
  332. Mulegino1 说:
    @Truth Vigilante

    现在看着它,大约 45 分钟的那个人说,他们一次可以让两千(2000)人进入所谓的毒气室。

    简单的物流使 Shoah Biz 的奇妙主张成为谎言。

    例如,所谓的“目击者”讲述的 Zyklon-B 毒气故事是真正的咆哮者。 在住宅或建筑物熏蒸中使用杀虫剂的说明要求将颗粒均匀地分布在整个所述建筑物的地板区域的薄层中。 这是为了促进氢氰化物(Zyklob-B 中的有效成分)的蒸发。

    相比之下,“eyewintesses”通常声称,这些药丸是从敞开的罐子里通过地下“毒气室”(实际上是地下太平间)屋顶上的一个洞,通过一个狭窄的金属丝网“库拉柱”倒出来的。到没有暖气的太平间的水泥地板上。 很可能,颗粒中所含的大部分氢氰化物都不会释放出来。

    即使是奥斯威辛-比克瑙毒气室最著名的机构专家让·克劳德·普莱萨克 (Jean Claude Pressac) 也承认,为营地综合体征用的 95% 的 Zyklon-B 用于合法的除虱和熏蒸目的——为此制造它首先。 这等于承认 所有 它用于此目的。

    即使是现代火葬,使用更复杂和高效的烤箱,也需要一个小时左右的时间才能将尸体烧毁。 然而,我们应该相信过去的原始烤箱可以在 15 分钟内完成(而且 2000 人可以容纳在一个不比普通房子中几个中等大小的房间大的房间里)。

    正确,此外,比克瑙(据称是主要的灭绝中心和大屠杀传说的核心)有 52 个火葬罐或马弗炉,每个都有 至少 每具尸体一小时的容量和大约 3,000 次火葬的终生容量。 烤箱和脱水缸需要定期清洁和维护,没有记录显示更换过。 因此,我们正在寻找在比克瑙火化的最多 150,000 具尸体。

    现存的营地记录显示,在所有国籍和原因的综合体中,有 67,000 人死亡,这很可能是正确的,并且鉴于可能存在一些缺失的记录,最多可能有大约 150,000 人死亡,所有原因,但主要是疾病。

    这比更新后的官方数字约 1.2 万减少了十倍。 受害者人数膨胀至少十倍似乎是大屠杀游说团的标准操作程序——这是波兰地下组织、苏联和国际犹太人宣传的历史结合。

    • 回复: @Patrick McNally
  333. @Ron Unz

    ” . . . However, I’d say that China+Russia is probably stronger than America and its decaying vassals, so even leaving aside nuclear risks, our elites are behaving in a very stupid manner in trying to provoke a conflict. But they’re stupid, so we should be surprised.”

    America’s “elites” are morally bankrupt hacks for whom military force is preferable to honest diplomacy. And, of course, they put the interests of a certain “shitty little country” ahead of American interests.

  334. Anonymous[183]• 免责声明 说:
    @Patrick McNally

    The plaque spoke of 4M “Jews and Communists” (I guess they made a distinction). And isn’t Hilberg the guy who thinks the Germans coordinated all of this through telepathy, essentially (through a “meeting of the minds” etc.)?

  335. @Anonymous

    Yes, that’s the one. You’ll notice if you look at any of his books going back to the 1960s he did not say “4 million” about Auschwitz at any time. He gave the 1 million claim, so critique that but don’t try claiming that the orthodox history in US academia asserts “4 million out of 6 million happened at Auschwitz.” It never said that.

    • 回复: @Anonymous
  336. @Mulegino1

    一些小失误。 比克瑙有 46 个火葬马弗炉,奥斯威辛集中营还有 6 个。 此外,奥斯威辛集中营的 6 人对他们进行了一定程度的砌体工作,这可能会提高他们的火化潜力。 这就是为什么当 Carlo Mattogno 讨论火葬容量时,他允许奥斯威辛集中营的每个马弗炉可能进行 4,000 次火葬,这与比克瑙不同。

  337. Incitatus 说:
    @Carolyn Yeager

    犹太人与德国的哑剧['WW2 是由犹太人/犹太人仇恨引起的'] 是 Unz(犹太人)话语的基础:没有什么比一次又一次地殴打一匹死马更好的了。 在 60 年代中期之前,很少提及在二战中谋杀犹太人。 并不意味着它没有发生(它确实发生了),但它不是因果关系。 换句话说,杀害犹太人并不是发动战争的原因。 很多人被杀。 犹太人只是另一个脚注,另一个悲剧性的人数。 对不起罗恩。 没有必要让它耸人听闻(除非你有另一个议程)。

    最好弄清楚 1918-33 年间德国人是如何被极端分子收编的。 它最终在哪里? 以下是 1945 年最终结果的证词,来自一名柏林强奸受害者和证人:

    “当他们翻找酒时,俄罗斯人终于在一个木隔板后面找到了埃尔维拉和他,还有另一名妇女,一名雇员也曾在那里寻求庇护。 说到这里,男人耸了耸肩,不想再说什么,走出厨房。

    “他们排成一列”他的妻子对我们耳语,而红发女郎则保持沉默。 '每个人都轮到他了。 她说至少有二十个,但她并不确切知道。 她不得不自己首当其冲。 其他女人都不好。

    我盯着埃尔维拉。 她肿胀的嘴巴从她苍白的脸上伸出来,就像一颗蓝色的李子。 “给他们看”酿酒师的妻子说。 红发女郎一言不发地打开她的衬衫,向我们展示她的乳房,全是瘀伤和咬伤。 我几乎不能写这个; 光是想想就让我再次作呕。

    我们离开了凡士林的其余部分。 没什么可说的,所以我们没有尝试。 但埃尔韦拉开始自己说话了,虽然我们几乎听不懂,但她的嘴唇肿得很厉害。 “我在它发生的时候祈祷,”她说,或者类似的话。 “我一直在祈祷:亲爱的上帝,感谢你让我喝醉了。” 因为在男孩们排好队之前,他们会用他们找到的任何东西向她灌输,在这期间他们不停地给她喝水。 对于这一切,我们感谢元首。”

    -匿名的“柏林的女人”; 日记 6 年 1945 月 136 日,第 XNUMX 页

    “感谢元首”?

    当然,卡洛琳,想成为 NSDAP-德国匈牙利裔美国人 Hausfrau,他的父母明智地移民到美国,而不是成为 Vaterland 的炮灰,她会想出一些借口来继续爱一个人。自杀奥地利大屠杀者。

    卡罗琳就是这样! 她的使命是否认,长期被事实所鄙视,更不用说她自己的亲戚了。 她对自杀阿道夫的热爱放大了她对遭受他失败的真正德国人的蔑视。

    • 不同意: Badger Down
  338. HdC 说:
    @anon

    优秀而简洁的总结! 谢谢。



  339. 视频链接

    Now they want a ((two-state solution)) somewhere in Germany.

  340. @Incitatus

    I think that the point is that the Jews were behind starting the war, as they are about starting another with Russia in Ukraine. The ‘holocaust’ was the spin put on history to provide justification for their very instigation of it, and to deliver up their long cherished prize of the creation of the state of Israel.

    Poor old anecdotal Elvira is a sorry tale, but it doesn’t in any way counter the value or seriousness of the material discussed here.

    Incitatus, I recall you do a lot of attacking those researching the negative side-effects of the ((vaccines)). Just a coincidence, right?

    • 回复: @Incitatus
    , @Incitatus
  341. anarchyst 说:
    @Corvinus

    Anne Frank was not an “innocent little girl” but was part of a jew-run black market operation. Not only that, her father survived the “death camp” having been treated in a camp hospital. They were interned for criminal activities.
    Anne Frank’s “diary” was partially written with a ball-point pen, not invented until the 1950s.
    Otto Frank cheated the publisher of Anne Frank’s “diary” out of shekels as well.

    • 同意: Towey
    • 回复: @Corvinus
  342. Bookish1 说:
    @Incitatus

    纯属胡说八道。 卡罗琳博览群书,对二战历史非常了解和客观。

    • 谢谢: Carolyn Yeager
    • 回复: @Carolyn Yeager
  343. Seraphim 说:

    It is intriguing, to say the least, that the spate of ‘revelations’ about the ‘hidden hands’ (so well hidden that nobody managed to pinpoint them) who pushed for WW1 is mute about open evidence, namely the Zionist project of the ‘League of East European States or Federation of East European States (Osteuropäischer Staatenbund). It was proposed in August 1914 by no other than the President of the newly formed ”German Committee for Freeing of Russian Jews” Max Bodenheimer, drawing the plans for the establishment of a German-dominated consociational buffer state to be established in the Russian Partition of the multi-ethnic territory of the former Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth (in actual fact reviving a proposal made in 1902 by the same Max Bodenheimer). The plan was endorsed immediately by the German High Command and took immediate action to organize the insurrection of the Jewish population against Russia ‘to avenge themselves for the pogroms’ (the manifestos launched behind Russian lines were redacted in terms like: ”‘Jews of Russia! Rise! Spring to arms! Help hunt the Moskal out of the West, out of Poland, Lithuania, White Russia, Volhynia and Podolia ! Freedom is coming from Europe!”). Don’t we hear the same language today in respect to Ukraine?
    The ‘six million holocaust’ incantation was meant to induce ‘sanctions’ against Russia, economic first (step taken by the USA in 1910 at the instigation of the rabid anti-Russian Jacob Schiff) and war if they didn’t work. Germany fell under its spell. Bodenheimer lured the Germans in supporting the Zionist goals stressing that it ”would be a boon to German ambitions in the Near East and would earn the gratitude of the entire Jewish people. “The influence of Jewry in foreign lands would accrue to the benefit of Germany”. His memorandum of 11 August insisted again on the “concurrence of German and Jewish interests in the World War.” The new buffer state was to be a monarchy under a Hohenzollern prince from Berlin.
    Germany was not the ‘victim’ of the ‘conspiracy’ of the ‘Round Table’ of Cecil Rhodes, but of its own greed and hubris and of the folly of its own leaders.
    More interesting is that Germans mulled the same plans during WW2 (the so-called “Jewish Lublin State”).

  344. @Anonymous

    Fact check: The plaque did not say “Jews and Communists.” It said “people.”

  345. @Sepp

    but also the rank corruption of Jewish Power.

    Do you mean Jewish power was corrupted to fit the narrative, or that Jewish power corrupts absolutely?

  346. @Badger Down

    ‘So you “insist it did in fact happen”. Do you see it as a convincing argument?’

    It would be like my argument for the existence of Australia.

    I can’t be bothered to make it.

    • 回复: @Badger Down
  347. @Ron Unz

    “……大屠杀直到几年后才被发明出来,直到好莱坞在 1970 年代开始制作有关它的电影和电视节目时才被广泛相信……”

    That simply isn’t true. My father had an enormous library — much of it various books about World War Two — and I was a precocious and voracious reader. 老耶勒, 铁路孩子,地狱的理论与实践 — it all went down the hatch.

    So I can attest to something with reasonable certainty. As of the mid-Sixties, the reality of the Holocaust was an accepted fact. It wasn’t even news.

    It also wasn’t uniquely significant — but that’s another subject.

    • 回复: @Ron Unz
    , @mark green
  348. georgie 说:
    @Carolyn Yeager

    They are the quintessential myth makers. Oy! Just look at the Old Testament!

  349. georgie 说:

    The Triple Alliance consisted of Germany, Austria-Hungary and Turkey, not Italy.

    • 回复: @Seraphim
  350. Incitatus 说:
    @Psychotic Break

    I think that the point is that the Jews were behind starting the war, as they are about starting another with Russia in Ukraine…”

    Well, that’s your opinion. Disagree.

    “Poor old anecdotal Elvira is a sorry tale.”

    No, actually, that is the TALE. Are you German? Carolyn certainly isn’t. All of you want another burnt sacrifice of Germans to make yourselves (uncomfortable in your life) feel good?

    How do you live with yourselves?

    “I recall you do a lot of attacking those researching the negative side-effects of the ((vaccines)). Just a coincidence, right?”

    Sorry. Never attacked anybody re COVID-19. Put that down to you (do you actually sleep at night, or are there demons)?

  351. Fox 说:
    @Patrick McNally

    I believe that Bruning was no longer Chancellor when the the Entente allies finally decided to drop further reparation collection from Germany. Since they started collecting them after the Second War’s end again, it seems that what Bruning achieved was a mere postponement of payment. (The last installment, as far as I know, was in 2011).
    If the KPD was on occasion tactically voting along the NSdAP this would merely show that they were thinking that they could outmanoeuver lukewarm Reds and drive them into their own camp. That they should have given up their fight for power on the street, in the press, in the assemblies for some far-fetched strategy that would eventually make them the victor in this struggle is not how they operated or operate; and in fact the violence on the street and agaist their opponents continued Do you think the Republicans in the US had engineered it that Biden and the Lefties should take the reigns of power, fail through their soon-proven incompetence and thus have to hand power to those who planned it that way?
    Additional remark: The Autobhan was called Autobahn; when Hitler had work started on it it was called Reichsautobahn, after the war it became the Bundesautobahn, but it was an Autobahn nonetheless in either case. The first conception of it went back to 1908, planning and conceptualizig went on, but it was Hitler who within weeks of his Chancellorship took up the task of actually building it as a means of having a great focussing project that would help relieve unemployment and stimulate national economy to lift it out from the ever-deepening crisis. I merely brought it up as one of the many examples being brought up to show that National Socialism somehow interrupted the just beginning rise of the Weimar Republic from the depths it had been pushed into by the idiotic policies of the Entente wages of victory reapers.

    • 谢谢: Carolyn Yeager
    • 回复: @Patrick McNally
  352. Ron Unz 说:
    @Colin Wright

    “……大屠杀直到几年后才被发明出来,直到好莱坞在 1970 年代开始制作有关它的电影和电视节目时才被广泛相信……”

    That simply isn’t true. My father had an enormous library…So I can attest to something with reasonable certainty. As of the mid-Sixties, the reality of the Holocaust was an accepted fact. It wasn’t even news.

    你应该更仔细地阅读我的话。

    Beaty’s 1951 book became a huge bestseller, and casually ridiculed the alleged Holocaust as long-debunked wartime propaganda. Numerous top American generals strongly endorsed his book and although Jewish activist groups like the ADL ferociously attacked it, they apparently never challenged his “Holocaust denial.” That strongly suggests that nobody believed in the Holocaust at that point.

    Raul Hilberg later launched the field of Holocaust studies with his 1961 book, originally released by a small, obscure press after it had been rejected by all major publishers, and the topic gradually gained momentum during the 1960s, so your mid-1960s material seems perfectly plausible. That’s “years later” than the time of Beaty’s book, just as I wrote.

    但是,尽管书籍读者、犹太团体和知识分子在 1960 年代已经了解了大屠杀,但在 98 年代电视和电影开始大力宣传大屠杀之前,可能有 1970% 的公众完全不知道。

    事实上,我认为第一部主要的大屠杀电影可能是 苏菲的选择 in 1982, based upon William Styron’s 1979 novel. The plot involved the gassing of blond Polish Catholics by the nasty Nazis, suggesting that even at that late date all the details of the historical narrative hadn’t yet been fully worked out.

    I covered all of these issues in a great deal of detail and if you’re sincerely interested you really should read a couple of my long articles:

    https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-holocaust-denial/

    https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-secrets-of-military-intelligence/

    • 谢谢: Carolyn Yeager
  353. mark green 说:
    @Colin Wright

    到 XNUMX 年代中期,大屠杀的现实已成为公认的事实。 这甚至都不是新闻。

    我现在快 70 岁了。直到 60 年代后期,“大屠杀”这个词还没有流行。 我就读于纽约州立公立学校。

    但犹太人的苦难(安弗兰克等人)已经在好莱坞电影和电视作品中加剧,更不用说在公立学校课程中了。 在这个时代,关于犹太人的术语包括“毒气室”和“集中营”。

    令人难以置信的是,直到 1967 年,好莱坞还在拍摄一部名为“霍根的英雄”的流行电视喜剧,讲述的是德国战俘营中的美国战俘。 没有提到犹太人或纳粹“极端主义”。 今天,这种描述永远不会发生。 这是不允许的。 二战现在都是关于犹太人的。 但在二战实际发生后的第一代人根本不是这样的。

    近几十年来,主题 独特的犹太人苦难 已经成长并变得更加紧迫和有倾向性。

    现代人的痴迷 独特的犹太人苦难 具有讽刺意味的是,伴随着无与伦比的犹太人财富和犹太人权力的崛起。 为什么? 以色列迫切需要这种宣传保护。 毕竟,“民主”以色列如何在没有大量的煤气灯和宣传的情况下进行种族清洗和策划侵略战争? 政治现实威胁着以色列的虚假形象。

    我对“大屠杀”作为二战期间(仅)涉及欧洲犹太人苦难的特定术语的第一次回忆来自那个名字的电视迷你系列。 这是70年代后期。
    通常,戏剧中的许多犹太人都是由非犹太人演员扮演的。 为什么? 好莱坞对犹太人物使用“白脸”,因此普通外邦人没有意识到犹太人主要与特定的种族/民族有关。 宗教信仰是一个旁注。

    尽管我在 1967 年被迫在公立高中观看《夜与雾》,但当时从未使用过“大屠杀”一词。 然而,有关“用犹太人的皮肤制成的灯罩”的故事却在流传。 然而,那根纱线已经被搁置了。 但其他有毒的谎言仍在流传和发明。 为这些好战分子的洗脑、好战和寄生而感到羞耻。

    • 回复: @Petermx
    , @Truth Vigilante
  354. Incitatus 说:
    @Psychotic Break

    “I think that the point is that the Jews were behind starting the war, as they are about starting another with Russia in Ukraine…”

    Well, that’s your opinion.

    “Poor old anecdotal Elvira is a sorry tale.”

    No, actually, that is the TALE. Are you German? Carolyn certainly isn’t. All of you want another burnt sacrifice of Germans to make yourselves (uncomfortable in your life) feel good?

    How do you live with yourselves?

    “I recall you do a lot of attacking those researching the negative side-effects of the ((vaccines)). Just a coincidence, right?”

    Sorry. Never attacked anybody re COVID-19. Put that down to you (do you actually sleep at night, or are there demons)?

    Stay well PB

    • 回复: @Petermx
    , @Psychotic Break
  355. Mehen 说:
    @Carolyn Yeager

    在给您的回复中,我可能应该强调“说服”而不是“营销”的概念。 我的错。

    尽管如此,你对我对你们修正主义者的适度有用的建议的回应说明了很多。 在考虑了你一段时间后,我现在说我不会相信你 任何其他 比起你对历史事实的掌握,我承认这是相当可观的。

    我在 TUR 表达的观点将我视为“公众”眼中的“极端反犹太主义者”,这是我永远不会被人知道的身份。 您将我描述为“中间派”这一事实向我表明,您对整个世界的概念仅限于互联网的这些非常被包围和精英的角落。 这是一种耻辱。 您可能只是在自己的果汁中炖,几乎没有新鲜空气。

    反正有什么要考虑的。

    • 回复: @Carolyn Yeager
  356. Seraphim 说:
    @georgie

    Get your history right. The Triple Alliance consisted indeed of Germany, Austria-Hungary and Italy, formed in 1882 and joined by Romania in 1883.
    Italy and Romania practically left the Alliance, by remaining neutral at the beginning of the war and in 1915 and respectively 1916 joined the Entente.
    Turkey joined the Alliance in August 1914 and Bulgaria in 1915.

  357. Anonymous[183]• 免责声明 说:
    @Patrick McNally

    I didn’t claim orthodox American historians or Hilberg accepted the 4M figure, please try reading better. The fact is, the Soviets did put forth this absurd figure, and the only real push-back was over how much of the alleged death toll could be credibly claimed by Jews. Mainstream historians certainly did nothing to correct such public perceptions, whatever they may have believed academically/professionally.

    Hilberg’s claim of 1M Jewish deaths has no more real basis in fact than the Soviet claims, and the actual Jewish death toll in Auschwitz is probably around 100K, i.e. consistent with German records. See the analysis here:

    http://www.pienisalaliittotutkimus.com/2021/04/29/revised-holocaust-calculations/

  358. @Patrick McNally

    Thanks for that – I stand corrected.

    Yes, I was alluding to the original plaque at Auschwitz that said 4 million were claimed to have died there.
    Even though the plaque doesn’t specify what proportion of those 4 million were Jews, and bearing in mind that few goyim have heard of Hilberg’s claims (not that they’re worth heeding anyway), most people that visited Auschwitz would have assumed (after years of Zio propaganda bombardment), that the bulk of these 4 million were Jews.

  359. Petermx 说:
    @Ron Unz

    “But although book readers, Jewish groups, and intellectuals had learned of the Holocaust during the 1960s, probably 98% of the public remained totally unaware until TV and films began heavily promoting it during the 1970s.” Exactly. I grew up in the 1960’s and I do not recall any discussion on the subject but in the 1970’s it was everywhere, including miniseries or movies made for TV.

  360. saggy 说: • 您的网站

    I didn’t claim orthodox American historians or Hilberg accepted the 4M figure, please try reading better.

    The point should be not that the 4M figure is too big, the point should be that the number of Jews that died in the camps for being Jews is zero. Beyond that, the Nazis aggressively investigated any crime by camp administrators, under the direction of Judge Konrad Morgen, and it is well documented.

    • 同意: Carolyn Yeager
  361. @Ron Unz

    你写了:

    In fact, I think the first major Holocaust film may have been Sophie’s Choice in 1982, based upon William Styron’s 1979 novel.

    In fact, it’s no coincidence that Meryl Streep was chosen to star in Sophie’s Choice after her performance in a TV miniseries made in 1978 called [none other than] ‘ Holocaust’:

    • 回复: @Petermx
    , @Sepp
  362. Petermx 说:
    @Incitatus

    “Well, that’s your opinion.” That is more than just an opinion. It was an opinion expressed by many leaders and other important people from different parts of the world. Hitler said it in his speeches, Lindbergh said Jews were leading agitators for war, Polish Ambassador to the US Jerzy Potocki said it and Joseph Kennedy commented on it, just to name a few.

  363. Petermx 说:
    @mark green

    “令人难以置信的是,直到 1967 年,好莱坞还在拍摄一部名为《霍根英雄》的流行电视喜剧,讲述的是德国战俘营中的美国战俘。 没有提到犹太人或纳粹‘极端主义’。” 是的。 我在 60 年代长大,我仍然记得许多关于二战的电视节目,但没有讨论犹太人。 我不记得有任何关于犹太人的讨论。 电视节目有《战斗》、《霍根英雄》、《12 点钟高》、《麦克海尔斯海军》和许多电影,但我不记得曾经提到过犹太人,而且这些节目多年来每周都在电视上播放。

    • 回复: @Carolyn Yeager
  364. @mark green

    你写了:

    令人难以置信的是,直到 1967 年,好莱坞还在拍摄一部名为“霍根的英雄”的流行电视喜剧,讲述的是德国战俘营中的美国战俘。 没有提到犹太人或纳粹“极端主义”。

    Interesting you should mention that Mark. I watched that show a lot and don’t recall a single episode mentioning the persecution of the Jews OR rescuing a Jew from an extermination camp etc.
    你会认为这样一个在全球范围内销售的受欢迎的节目会成为传播大屠杀的潜意识信息的理想平台。

    由于该节目的制作人是犹太人爱德华·H·费尔德曼,因此这更加难以理解。

    陌生人仍然在维基百科提供的以下信息的上下文中:

    扮演四个主要德国角色的演员——Werner Klemperer (Klink)、John Banner (Schultz)、Leon Askin (General Burkhalter) 和 Howard Caine (Hochstetter)——都是犹太人。

    此外,克伦佩勒、班纳和阿斯金都在二战期间逃离了纳粹(凯恩,本名科恩,是美国人)。
    Further, Robert Clary, a French Jew who played LeBeau, spent three years in a concentration camp (with an identity tattoo from the camp on his arm, “A-5714”)

    Once again, Colin Wright’s peddling of Holohoaxery is exposed for what it is. It seems CW can’t help himself and takes every opportunity to show his controllers that he’s a good little sayan.

    I’ve noticed that Colin Wright’s persistent defence of the Holohoax is not just limited to this thread – he’s saturated a previous thread in UR on this topic with his unsubstantiated shilling on behalf of the myth makers.

    CW has chosen an anglicised pseudonym but we know he’s not a ‘Colin’ – more likely he’s a Yehuda or Shlomo.

  365. @littlereddot

    The alleged murder of six million Jews by Germany is bogus. It didn’t happen. Insufficient evidence.

    Same thing with China, it’s bogus propaganda from the US. Try this one: while genociding millions in camps, China is forcing Uyghurs and Han to wed, and presumably make lots of babies. Does that make sense? How are they going to police it?

    https://share.america.gov/china-coerces-uyghur-women-into-unwanted-marriages/

  366. @Patrick McNally

    You are drifting off topic. Nit-picking at “victims”, “Jews”, “deaths”, and so on.
    Is there any evidence for “the murder of six million Jews by the Germans”?
    Because if there is insufficient evidence, the Holocaust is fake.

    https://duckduckgo.com/?q=auschwitz+plaque&t=h_&iax=images&ia=images

    • 同意: Sepp
  367. @Colin Wright

    Oh dear! Now a good reply would have been to provide evidence for the murder of 6m Jews, or at least 4m. But no: Colin is off to Australia, wondering why he’s “vilified”.

    • 回复: @Carolyn Yeager
  368. @Ron Unz

    ‘…Numerous top American generals strongly endorsed his book and although Jewish activist groups like the ADL ferociously attacked it, they apparently never challenged his “Holocaust denial.” That strongly suggests that nobody believed in the Holocaust at that point…’

    Meh. I was born in 1958, so I can hardly claim to have been knowledgeable about the state of historiography on the subject in the Fifties. On the other hand, you like to preface your discussions with confessions of how you ‘never knew about _____ until recently, when you were surprised to learn that _____,’ so perhaps my impressions are at least as valid as yours.

    I was reading my dad’s library circa 1965 — which, when it came to World War Two, consisted more or less of a random sampling of the literature on the subject which had appeared over the previous twenty years.

    So 1945-1965 — say an average publication date of 1955. In that body of material, the Holocaust was not merely not ordinarily questioned, it was accepted as a known fact.

    Of course, it wasn’t called the Holocaust, and of course it wasn’t vested with the unique significance that it has been since, but it was granted that the Germans had killed several million Jews. It was about as controversial as claiming they’d invaded Poland.

    One could conceivably argue the Holocaust didn’t happen at all, but to say anything ‘strongly suggests that nobody believed in the Holocaust at that point’ strikes me as simply indefensible. I’d say almost everybody did. The main difference between then and now was what meaning was attached to the events, not whether or not they happened.

  369. @Incitatus

    ‘That’s who Carolyn is! She’s on a mission of denial, long despised by facts, let alone her own kin. Her love for suicide Adolf magnifies her distain for actual Germans who suffered from his failure.’

    Well, no. In the example you cite, they suffered from the Russians.

    After all, the Americans and British, while hardly concerned to win friends, rarely behaved like this, and even the French usually didn’t come close to what you describe.

    I find this sort of redirection irritating. It’s like in the wake of January 6th, when the media was seriously asserting the protestors themselves should have been blamed for the murder of Ashli Babbitt.

    Hitler was responsible for losing the war. He wasn’t responsible for the orgy of bestiality the Soviets deliberately incited their soldiery to engage in. The Soviets were responsible for that.

    • 回复: @Badger Down
  370. Druid 说:
    @Old Brown Fool

    Khazaria. Thugs they were. Eventually destroyed by the Rus. Fought wars with the Muslims in the caucuses.

  371. Petermx 说:
    @Truth Vigilante

    I remember when that was shown on TV. That miniseries may have had the biggest impact of anything to make the “Holocaust” known to the USA and then the world. To use their words, it was pure “hatred” but towards Germans, which is alright, actually demanded. That miniseries prompted the German director Edgar Reitz to make the first of a series of films in which he touches on the subject (at least in the first film) which covers several generations of a German family from the years 1918-1982?.

    According to Wikipedia “The combined length of the 5 films – broken into 32 episodes – is 59 hours and 32 minutes, making it one of the longest series of feature-length films in cinema history.”

    “After watching Holocaust, Reitz was offended by the American ‘melodramaticisation’ of the tragic events and the positive reception the film received.” I believe this to be true. I read his own words on this.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heimat_(film_series)

    • 同意: Truth Vigilante
  372. @Incitatus

    Der Grund, warum Menchen zum Schweigen gebracht werden, ist nicht, weil sie lügen, sondern weil sie die Wahrheit reden。 Wenn Menschen lügen, können ihre eigenen Worte gegen sie angewandt werden。 Doch wenn sie die Wahrheit sagen,gibt es kein anderes Gegenmittel als die Gewalt。
    西奥多·方坦 (1819-1889)

    Ja, ich bin Deutscher und du bist Israel, richtig?

    • 回复: @Al Liguori
  373. @Fox

    The Reichsautobahn was an example of how the NSDAP could flip-flop depending on whether they were in power or not. The NSDAP had originally been opposed to it on the grounds that very few ordinary people actually owned cars. But once Hitler was in office he grabbed it as his own special project. But everything which was enacted on the economy during Hitler’s tenure simply carried on what people like Bruning and Schleicher had already started.

    Of course it’s true that the Allies willingly demanded reparations for WWI after Germany had lost WWII. That has no relevance to the fact that the financial indicators in the German economy began rising once the Allies had declared their acceptance of an end to the Versailles reparations. It was Bruning’s diplomacy which brought things to that point, regardless of his eventual departure from office.

    The Comintern in the 1920s had been forced to recognize the fact that the Social Democrats had won the main body of steadily employed German workers and there was no easy way to change this. In 1928 the Third Period was announced by the Comintern as a time in which the Social Democrats needed to be seen as the main barrier against proletarian revolution and hence be branded as “social fascists.” The KPD’s slogan of “After Hitler, our turn” was based on the Comintern analysis that Hitler coming to power would be the beginning of the end of German capitalism as workers would quickly see that Hitler had no solutions for them and with the Social Democrats crushed by the National Socialists, the German proletariat would now have to turn to the Communists.

    Perhaps if Hitler had gained the Chancellorship 3 years earlier then something like this might have occurred. If Hitler had accidentally been given the Chancellorship in 1930 then the Allies would never have agreed to drop the Versailles reparations the way that Bruning persuaded them to do. Possibly the French might have occupied the Ruhr the way they did in 1923. The German economy would have totally collapsed. Even then, it’s more likely that Hitler would simply have been overthrown by the military without the KPD ever getting close to real power. But coming into office after Bruning had persuaded the Allies to drop reparations and after Schleicher had passed the economic stimulus bill which was the legal basis for Hitler’s about-face to suddenly be in favor of the Reichsaurobahn allowed Hitler to coast on what others had done while grabbing the credit for himself.

  374. @Badger Down

    I described in comment 166 up above some of the issues with gauging the number of Jewish deaths which may have occurred in WWII. As indicated there, a guess of 2.2 million as a world Jewish population decline is easily believable but difficult to substantiate one way or another. But it wasn’t me who drifted off topic. If some fool is going to invoke the changing of a Polish plaque manufactured during the Soviet era as evidence that orthodox history in the West has been wrong, then they need to check to make sure they what the orthodox historians have actually said. I can assure that Christopher Browning, as one prominent example, has never made any claim about 4 million at Auschwitz. So pointing to the changed plaque has no bearing on whether or not to believe Browning’s version of history.

    • 回复: @Sepp
    , @Badger Down
  375. Sepp 说:
    @Patrick McNally

    “正如那里所指出的,世界犹太人口减少 2.2 万的猜测很容易相信,但很难以某种方式证实。 ”

    你就像培养皿中的变形虫事实检查员。 每当有人试图站稳脚跟时,你就会四处扭动并避开这一点。 你所做的只是吐出对讨论毫无帮助的无用“事实核查”。

    无论如何,2.2 万的“猜测”构成了对大屠杀的否认,并且直接与世界年鉴中减少 5.4 万的数字相矛盾,您在上面花费了几条评论,一无所获。 你是一个可悲且无用的空间浪费。

    • 同意: Al Liguori
    • 回复: @Patrick McNally
  376. Sepp 说:
    @Truth Vigilante

    Last night I stumbled across this fascinating blog:

    https://modeltrial.blogspot.com/2021/01/the-banker-model-and-jewish-spy-inside.html

    I found this excerpt to be fascinating and relevant:

    “The introduction of the Deutsche Mark was one of the ways in which Hermann Abs shaped the postwar world, along the lines suggested by Robi Mendelssohn to British intelligence: what could be termed an anti-Morgenthau Plan. Instead of permanently weakening the German economy, the Western allies should take steps to build up the Federal Republic. Hermann Abs’s other major contribution to this plan was his successful renegotiation of German debts (including both pre-war debts and reparations for the First and Second World Wars): the London Debt Agreement (Londoner Schuldenabkommen) was signed in February 1953, with Abs leading the German side. Not coincidentally, at almost exactly the same time the West German Bundestag ratified an agreement for long-term German payments to the new Israeli state.”

    This period after the Nuremberg tribunals and creation of the Iron Curtain and the creation of the D-Mark as well is really neglected.

    That the “Holocaust” was a part of Jewish plans for Europe for a century is quite clear, and it is the subject of this thread. What is neglected is how the Jews knew that the creation of Israel was going to require massive subsidies and assistance. Germany was clearly the industrial powerhouse of Europe, and this plot to burden Germany with guilt in order to force her to bear the burden of creating the foundation of Israel was a key ingredient for the the Holofraud. When Judea declared war on Germany in 1933, Hitler had already been forced to provide massive amounts of industrial plant and technology including rail systems, locomotives and electrical systems. But this was just the tip of the iceberg. After the war all of Israel’s infrastructure was built and paid for by Germany. Just as Hitler and Schacht had been forced to finance Israel before the war, so were Adenauer and Abs forced to finance it even more afterwards.

    What is interesting from this article is how the delicate negotiations with Jewish Power were necessary to get the D-Mark put in place, to allow Germany to restart international trade, and most importantly to get Morgentau’s and all the American Jew’s claws off of Germany’s throat.

    “German political and business leaders would agree (in general terms) that they and their nation were ‘guilty’ of whatever their enemies wanted to allege. They would act as the military frontline of the Cold War, and to some extent finance it, while giving up any notion of an independent German foreign and defence policy. And they would hand over huge amounts of money, goods and technology to the new state of Israel.

    In return Germany’s enemies agreed that a line would be drawn after the first phase of Nuremberg trials. There would be no endless witch-hunt against those who had held political or economic influence during the Third Reich, and Morgenthau-style plans for the complete crushing of the German nation would be shelved. While the German Reich would still be fractured into East and West, and remains fractured to this day even after the so-called ‘reunification’ thirty years ago, a substantial part of Germany would be allowed to become something resembling a ‘normal’ country.”

    Holofraud guilt was the bludgeon used to force Germany to accept the yoke of Israel, and if Germany did not accept those terms they would face the Morgentau genocide.

    The quid pro quo was that Germans would not be persecuted for contrived “war crimes” and would be allowed to get back to the business of building Israel.

    Of course, the Jews didn’t keep their side of the bargain. 20 years later the Holocaust Guilt Complex went into high gear, and this fake yoke of guilt is as big as it ever was. Germany is still paying reparations to Jews who never died and likely had left Europe before the war even started. In any case, no German or European owes a dime of reparations to any communist Jew, and that represents the vast majority of European Jews during the inter-war period.

    • 谢谢: Truth Vigilante
  377. @Anonymous

    LOL,

    Obviously you don’t realise that it wasn’t really a question.

    So I guess the point was lost on you.

    My fault for casting pearls before swine.

  378. @anonyms

    撇开你为被代理人伤害的自尊心而付出的血腥补偿,我觉得你回复我关于女性和穆斯林男性的帖子很有趣,根据我的经验,确认它。

    希望有一天你会意识到你的“西方荡妇”和虔诚的“穆斯林好女人”的形象是关于你和你对自己的幻想。 你的一部分想扮演每个角色。

    这会让你摆脱爱女人的错觉,而你只是爱你想要她们成为的样子,这实际上只是一种伪装成关心对方的复杂的自爱自恨。

    如果你真的爱女人,而不是一个明显的厌恶女人的人,你会对她们为什么做出选择感到好奇,并且很容易给予非评判性关注的美丽礼物,而不仅仅是空洞的关怀和可恨的评判。

    我想我的帖子会越过你的头脑,所以,如果这对你来说是胡说八道,为什么不试着描述一下,不要太含糊或伪装道德,你希望女人是什么样的,为什么这会让你高兴自私的理由? 请不要从事无聊的职业或“真正关心”或“上帝这么说”,女性如何表现得像你想要的那样会让你对自己感觉良好。

    • 巨魔: Al Liguori
  379. @Ron Unz

    谢谢。

    The more I read about this subject here on UR, the more the subject appears to be a hoax.

    It was something that happened so long ago, and that the narrative has been repeated so ubiquitously that I assumed it was a fact. That is the power of propaganda.

    Thank you Edward Bernays.

  380. @Bookish1

    By the way, I blocked Incitatus quite some time ago, so I don’t see what he writes to me. I do sometimes get an idea from those who comment on it, but I’ve never been tempted to unblock to take a peek. His comments are all the same.

  381. @Badger Down

    I’ve never met a “believer” who will agree to 任何 request to provide 任何 evidence beyond their simple refusal to question it. Or read a single book, even if available online. Colin’s “I can’t be bothered” is really what it all comes down to no matter what words they choose. I just experienced it with an old, somewhat long-lost friend last week, so it’s fresh in my mind.

    • 回复: @Colin Wright
    , @simple mind
  382. @saggy

    I am confused by your praising Holocaust denial but posts like this one. How do you reconcile those facts? As it happens I watched the long film of the camps and got quite a lot out of it. It confirmed to some extent my tentative suggestion to Ron that the senior American officers who effectually denied knowledge of the attempted genocide of Jews were familiar only with those in Germany, Austria and the West which no one suggests we’re extermination camps for Jews but, like the POW camp my father was in, killed a lot of people by starvation a d disease toward the end of the war. Nonetheless I was struck by it being said and, purportedly, shown, that Dachau had a gas chambers for killing people.

    • 巨魔: Arthur MacBride
  383. @Wizard of Oz

    I can’t really comment about Dachau, because I never went there. But I went to Auschwitz.

    I could see no ovens for large numbers of people, certainly no gas chambers.

    What there is is a complex of maybe 10 old-world red-brick (originally Polish?) army barrack blocks (three-four storey, 100 men to a room etc.). In the grassy spaces between each parallel block set are raised grass-covered bunker-like structures. These are what is claimed as the ‘gas chambers’ and the ‘human ovens’. Actually, when you go inside these bunkers, which are really quite small, no bigger than a bedroom, one sees – despite all the propaganda plastered on the walls – that there certainly are no gas chambers. There are ovens; relatively quite small ones, like pizza ovens, but flat and the size and height of a large double bed.

    It is obvious what all this is. It is the heating system for the barrack blocks, and the ovens are exactly what they really are; baker’s ovens which utilize the heat from the heating system to prepare bread for the soldier’s meals. Maybe the bunkers served also for protection in the event of air-raid.

    Sorry to burst your banker’s bubble!

    • 回复: @Wizard of Oz
  384. @Carolyn Yeager

    ‘I’ve never met a “believer” who will agree to any request to provide any evidence beyond their simple refusal to question it. Or read a single book, even if available online. Colin’s “I can’t be bothered” is really what it all comes down to no matter what words they choose. I just experienced it with an old, somewhat long-lost friend last week, so it’s fresh in my mind.’

    You’re obviously passionate on the subject, yet you refrain from becoming outright abusive, which is refreshing, so let me try to give you some answers as to why ‘I can’t be bothered.’

    1. Almost anything can be ‘demonstrated’ with the selective use of evidence. I find the arguments ‘demonstrating’ that the Holocaust didn’t happen unimpressive.

    2. If I did take up a particular claim — say, that it would have been impossible to hide all the remains of all the Jews allegedly murdered at Treblinka — I’d just be faced with another claim. It’s not like I could devote a week to this, and everyone would agree the Holocaust in fact did happen. No, we wouldn’t get anywhere.

    3. As a rule, when something didn’t happen as described, the evidence is thin, or something is off. But with the Holocaust, one gets such convincing documents as Christopher Browning’s Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Holocaust in Poland.’ Here’s a day-by-day, based on original sources, account of a reserve unit of middle-aged conscripts, wandering around rural Poland, participating in what sounds remarkably like the orthodox version of the Holocaust — with all the trimmings. I don’t think it was all made up.

    4. This is spectacularly arrogant, but I’ve spent a good deal of my life studying history, both formally and on my own — and while often there is no such thing as absolute certainty in the field, I’ve developed a good sense of when some claim is dubious and when it’s solid. For example, in the otherwise excellent 利奥波德国王的幽灵, Adam Hochschild 估计有 XNUMX 万刚果人被谋杀。

    That didn’t happen — I’m sure of it. A million? Possibly. A hundred thousand? No doubt. Ten million? No — for a long list of reasons.

    Conversely, I think the Holocaust did happen — and I think I’m right. And it has been my experience that when subsequent events allow me to verify my guess, it turns out I was correct.

    So I’m convinced the Holocaust did occur — and that it occurred more or less as described. I prefer to devote my energies to matters about which I am less sure, or which are of more immediate importance.

    • 谢谢: simple mind
  385. @Psychotic Break

    You seem to several laps behind the field. The Auschwicz you saw is a post war reconstruction which may or may not be authentic.

  386. Mulegino1 说:
    @Wizard of Oz

    达豪没有使用杀人毒气室。

    有一个据称是毒气室的展览,但上面写着:“设计为毒气室,但从未使用过。” 这可能是盟军的宣传道具,就像“无处可去的烟囱”一样
    奥斯威辛太平间/防空洞。

    德国集中营里的一切都被指定了一个险恶的目的,比如奥斯威辛集中营的游泳池,据称是消防水库之类的东西。 普通的淋浴间都是“毒气室”,普通的乘客坡道是“选择坡道”,卡车是“加油车”,一个简单的医院和它的医生变成了“莫罗博士岛”式的房子。恐怖。

    在整个 Holohoax 叙事中,有一条绝对的谎言和巨大的夸张的共同点。

    • 同意: John Wear, Petermx, HdC, Al Liguori
    • 回复: @simple mind
  387. @Mehen

    I will answer this, because you are using very low-life tactics and trying to impute such tactics to me, in the usual “turn-the -tables” projection of all liars. I am used to this from strange men on the Internet who pop up here and there. Yes, I tag you as a woman-hater, as I’ve now noticed your preponderance of insulting & negative comments to women, who are very sparsely represented here.

    When I wrote my reply to you, I SAID that I did not know you and had only read very few (actually two, maybe three) of your comments. They were not memorable, and left little impression on me. Thus I have every reason to question why you should choose to address me at all, since nothing I’ve put here is extreme or out of line with many others (men) who you have not chosen to attack. Nor did I personally attack you.

    That you are an extreme anti-Semite I now get, but I haven’t seen evidence you’re a fan of Adolf Hitler, National Socialism or the Third Reich–which Thomas Dalton, author of the article we’re commenting on, is–makes you also “middle of the road” in my judgement. So I put you down as a middle-easterner, maybe Muslim, bc of all the above. I realize I could be wrong, but since you don’t want your identity known, what can I do? [You could still be a jew running a scam for dear old israel.]

    Now to the insulting words you’ve directed at me, without, as I said, any provocation from me that I can find.

    在考虑了你一段时间之后,我现在说我不会相信你,除了你对历史事实的掌握,我承认这是相当可观的。

    What does “some time” refer to? Five days? Five months? I mean, how well do you know me that you should decide to ‘take me on?’ And since I can be trusted with accurate historical knowledge (facts), on what basis do you consider me untrustworthy in all other ways? That’s extreme language. Your answer

    您将我描述为“中间派”这一事实向我表明,您对整个世界的概念仅限于互联网的这些非常被包围和精英的角落。

    Oh wow. That’s all? You judge me as 大概 (you use the word ‘suggests’) too extreme in everything, but you can’t point to anything specific. And you say you you specialize in “persuasion?” The reason for your timidity, it seems to me, is twofold. That you want to be anonymous, therefore if you got to know me by talking to me, I would also get to know you! And you’re incapable of critiquing any of my work, which is reasonably extensive.

    So why do I think you’ve targeted me? Bc I do a better job of getting to the heart of how to shut down the ‘Jewish Holocaust’ than most others who think the way is to continue to rehash the same arguments pro and con. I recommend questioning Jewish power and control over all our own elites who refuse to question any of it. They even agree to pass laws making such questioning illegal! And then hail Democracy. We must go after 他们, and for those reasons specifically. Their own reason can only be fear of Jewish retaliation. So ask: How can that be? How did it happen? That’s the question for these times, it’s where we need to go. Point to and question Jewish power and its many abuses without fear, in a factual manner, and how widespread it is. In 2017 I tried to promote the phrase “No Special Treatment for Jews” which I thought was funny because “Special Treatment” is a term used in Holocaust lore as a coded word used to mean “to be sent to the gas chamber”!! It actually did not. It meant the program of taking and storing all valuable goods of deported Jews that they couldn’t take with them. Some of it was actually sent on to them via freight trains where they were relocated in the East, whether you want to believe it or not. But I’m using it in the literal way meaning special benefits for Jews only. Take a look: https://carolynyeager.net/special-treatment-jews

    • 谢谢: Badger Down
  388. @Colin Wright

    Colin, this is 100% ‘woke’ delusion. You are 醒来 SINE NON QUA. Congratulations.

    You believe what your environmental milieu convinces itself is ‘true’. This much is just as obvious from the content your website. You may be a nice, super guy, but you are wholly a product of your time. Just because your social set a thing happened or didn’t happen doesn’t mean that really is the case.

    You don’t provide any proof for your statements, let alone evidence.

    Where does this ‘thinking’ come from? Isn’t there in you any sense of inner rebel? Has all your self-contrarianism been subsumed? Does the whole mass media model represent the ‘truth’ to you? I really can’t believe that! Surely you must have some inner doubts about some things. Maybe you do have such doubts, but some things only; those things prescribed to you.

    Maybe the future you want for us is utter conformism to corporate power interests.

    Could you ever admit to have been misled on anything? Then perhaps on another thing? Is that at all possible?

    Basically, you are ‘liberated’, presently you think with your butt-hole instead of your brain. And I mean that quite literally; you think that because the butt-hole has now been liberated to openly enjoy comings-and-goings, you owe a supreme debt of gratitude to those who delivered it to you, despite anything and everything your brain would otherwise advise.

    • 同意: Arthur MacBride
    • 回复: @Colin Wright
  389. @Wizard of Oz

    That’s true what you say:

    …which may or may not be authentic.

    If you don’t know if its authentic or not, what’s your great stress to load us up?

    I note your PC-spelling version ‘Auschwicz’. I smell a rat!

    The Auschwicz you saw is a post war reconstruction…

    Thank you, but I didn’t tell you when I saw it. Presumptuous prick.

    • 回复: @Wizard of Oz
  390. We’re here now, Ladies and Gentile-men.

    This is the crux of ‘woke’. This is what woke really is.

    This is where woke rubber meets the real road.

    Jewish bullshit, Jewish mass murder and the Holohoax.

    Trash the Holohoax and the whole woke fabric literally falls apart from its very foundations.

    • 同意: John Wear
  391. @Petermx

    I enjoyed Hogan’s Heroes but I resented the portrayal of Sgt. Schultz as such a stupid German and the butt of jokes. Now I would welcome such a portrayal because 联系,正如马克所说,永远不会被允许。

    I loved 12 O’Clock High, about Americans — actually I loved the hero (and others) in their sexy leather flying jackets, boots and neck scarfs. Yum! A leather flying jacket makes every man look great!

    • 回复: @Petermx
  392. @Badger Down

    That’s right. Keep pushing the theme of the bottom line, i.e. 不足的证据 for anything like what they say happened. Their MO is to simply distract, distort and dissemble. Don’t allow them to get away with it.

  393. @John Wear

    You are getting hung up on somebody else’s choice of expression. I read a bunch of the claptrap posted on Inconvenient History where you are trying to “prove” something that only exists in your mind anyway.

    没人在乎

    • 巨魔: Sepp, Petermx
  394. @Mulegino1

    这是 表达 禁闭、与亲人和家园分离、对无助的少数群体的绝对掠夺并在监狱集中营中统治他们。

    It’s hardly an “exaggeration”, nobody owes you a narrative. Can you imagine losing everything and being stuffed into a train headed for unknown parts? Losing contact with everyone you ever knew?

    It 感觉 just like the descriptions, which is the point of all narration. This isn’t a court case where somebody has to “prove” the facts, it’s religious and metaphysical.

    • 回复: @Psychotic Break
    , @Mulegino1
  395. @Carolyn Yeager

    I’ve never met a “believer” who will agree to any request to provide any evidence beyond their simple refusal to question it.

    That’s a feature not a bug, the nature of any “belief” is religious and metaphysical. All of it is effective true and metaphysically accurate (esp. for “believers”), which is good enough for the common man.

    You are laying great burdens on other men’s shoulders but lift not a finger to help, so quit challenging somebody else’s square. The problem is YOURS: taking things too literally then habing a meltodown when it wasn’t “true”. It’s true enough to convey the impression, and that’s what counts

    Most people are metaphysical, it’s a rare bird who can really grasp geometry and physics.

    Even very logical, competent people will get carried away with delusions from time to time, or “see” something in their mind that makes little sense in workaday living.

  396. @simple mind

    And while the sentiment is unfortunately very true,

    …it’s religious and metaphysical

    the specific context is melodramatic, over-blown, and definitely over-hyped.

    To the point not only of religious and metaphysical blackmail historically, but actual physical and financial coercion presently.

    We don’t need, or want, to carry the weight of your fraud on our backs forever.

    That’s why you are panicking now, game’s soon up!

    • 回复: @simple mind
  397. Fox 说:
    @Colin Wright

    So, what is the ‘holocaust’? Persecution of Jews? The measures taken to segregate them from their ‘portable fatherland’ in the words of the (Jew) Heine? Is it the planned, systematic execution of mass murder, is it the six million gassed? Are you counting the anti-partisan actions which were often directed at Jews more than non-Jews because of the heavy underground and partisan activity found among Jews as ‘holocaust’?
    Is it the Holocaust (capital H) with the three requirements of 6 million, and systematic planning gassing?
    This notion has been so singularly defined as meaning a state policy to gas 6 million Jews that you cannot insist on believing in a ‘holocaust’ that means something less than these three conditions. What you write is expressing the desire of having the cake and eating it, too.
    Many Jews suffered a bad lot, no one will deny that, but in a world where thousands, sometimes tens or hundreds of thousands died in a day, others also suffered a bad lot. If the Germans could have just driven all the Jews in their sphere of power over the border without regard to their fate, as the Czechs and Poles did with the Germans after 1945, who were deprived of their home and their possessions, would you still speak of a ‘holocaust’? The Czechs and the Poles started already with getting the Germans out of the territory of their new states beginning in 1919. Would that be a ‘holocaust’ if it had been directed at Jews, but just an occurrence of little interest since it was directed at other peoples? The many instances Dalton cites where Jews felt under duress and which were then given the designation ‘holocaust’, suggest that it would be so.
    So, what is the ‘holocaust’ in your world?

    The fact that one will end up in prison for refusing to make the public declaration of loyalty to the Holocaust State speaks volumes about the nature and especially factual reality of it. People who profess to be convinced of its reality and who accept the arguments given in a maniacally driven state-sponsored and supported propaganda industry (including schools) might not be as much convinced than rather choosing the path of no resistance and an unmolested life.
    That’s why I think that an interruption of the daily dosage of Holocaust by de-fanging the press and sponsorship i high places would very soon lead to a tearing up of the fabric of it.

    • 回复: @Colin Wright
    , @Sepp
  398. @Sepp

    He is australian, they don’t know much about anything down there.

    • 哈哈: Psychotic Break, Petermx
    • 回复: @Petermx
    , @Sepp
  399. @Psychotic Break

    HTF is “we” and “you”?? Get off my tip, lurker

    • 回复: @Psychotic Break
  400. Petermx 说:
    @Carolyn Yeager

    I liked McHale’s Navy. I don’t know what I thought about the other ones when they were on but at some point (and this may have been years later) I didn’t like them. I think I may have felt that way to some extent while watching them. If I remember correctly, my mom laughed at Sgt. Schultz on Hogan’s Heroes. It didn’t bother her. She also laughed at Archie Bunker. My father didn’t. He may have suspected that All In The Family was on TV not just to make people laugh.

    Even though I do not recall any discussion of the “Holocaust”in the 1960’s, I think one of the reasons my father transferred to another state (we moved to Florida) is that he may have had some colleagues at work that were unfriendly. Even though I never noticed any, I think my parents may still have had slight accents in the 1960’s.

    • 回复: @Carolyn Yeager
  401. @simple mind

    That’s the issue with the Tel Aviv butt-fuckers brigade; everything is pronouns and drama queen hyperbole. Army’s such a drag, right?

    • 回复: @simple mind
  402. Mulegino1 说:
    @simple mind

    你能想象失去一切并被塞进一列开往未知部分的火车吗? 与您认识的每个人失去联系?

    感觉就像描述一样,这是所有叙述的重点。 这不是一个必须有人“证明”事实的法庭案件,它是宗教和形而上学的。

    如果它是形而上学和宗教的,那么它超出了国际正义的范围,对吧? 而且,由于这不是一个严格的事实,因此不能通过敲诈或赔偿来正确解决,对吗?

    不幸的是,以色列的存在归功于这种叙述。 它剥夺了巴勒斯坦基督徒和穆斯林,将他们置于与你所说的德国人将犹太人置于同样的痛苦境地。

    所以,是的,举证责任在犹太人身上,通过事实证据证明叙述是真实的,并且这是对犹太人造成的独特邪恶,将他们的痛苦归因于比人类其他人更大的价值。

    • 回复: @simple mind
  403. saggy 说: • 您的网站
    @Wizard of Oz

    How do you reconcile those facts?

    I linked to the vid to demonstrate that the hoax was in full effect at Nuremberg. And, in fact, clips from that vid are still being used today as evidence of the ‘holocaust’. Note that in the beginning of the film it states that the footage was taken by allied military photographers, thus it was taken after the war ended. The images of prisoners who had died of typhus in the last months of the war and after the war had ended (10,000 prisoners died at Belsen from typhus after the camp had been liberated !) have been shown since the end of the war and are still being shown today as being of Jews gassed by the Nazis in death camps. For example an Oprah/Elie Wiesel Auschwitz special used 6 clips from the vid as evidence for the hoax. Images like this are the only ‘evidence’ that the hoax happened. The true provenances of all the clips in the Oprah vid are documented in this vid …


    视频链接If the vid doesn’t play click on the video link to be redirected.

  404. @Psychotic Break

    You’re probably WEARING drag, you slithering little faggot

    • 回复: @Psychotic Break
  405. Corvinus 说:
    @Truth Vigilante

    “事实上,英国人确实对他们在解放集中营中发现的死者进行了数百次尸检,但没有人被发现是由于毒气造成的。”

    诱饵和开关。 这位英国医生从未进行过尸检。 相反,他研究了他们的尸体。 你说英国医生在所有集中营对犹太人的尸体进行了大量的法医检查。

    ——欧文是一个有缺陷但迷人的角色。 英国历史学家 AJP Taylor 于 1978 年称欧文为档案研究“无与伦比的工业”和“良好的学术”的作者。 泰勒以历史判断批评欧文的双重标准,以欧文声称没有书面元首命令证明希特勒不知道大屠杀,同时声称缺乏书面命令证明丘吉尔下令据称谋杀了西科尔斯基将军。

    ——在对欧文的《丘吉尔的战争》(1988)一书的评论中,大卫·坎纳丁批评了欧文的“证据双重标准”,指责欧文“要求绝对的文件证据来证明德国人有罪(就像他试图证明希特勒不对大屠杀),同时依靠间接证据谴责英国(如他对盟军轰炸德累斯顿的描述)”

    • 回复: @John Wear
    , @Carolyn Yeager
  406. Corvinus 说:
    @Truth Vigilante

    “Much proof was furnished during the Zundel trial in Toronto in 1985…”

    Which has been discredited.

    • 回复: @Truth Vigilante
  407. @Colin Wright

    LOL, Colin. You are a pro, but that doesn’t make you convincing. Only blatantly insincere. Anyone who has logged almost 14,000 comments here since the beginning has to be a professional.

    What you’ve offered me as “answers” is an attempt at sleight of hand, turning everything backwards or inside out, and putting on me YOUR responsibility to prove the holocaust narrative by telling me that it’s my responsibility to prove it did 不能 happen. That is never the case.

    I think I can demonstrate that with just your point #1.

    1. Almost anything can be ‘demonstrated’ with the selective use of evidence. I find the arguments ‘demonstrating’ that the Holocaust didn’t happen unimpressive.

    There are no such arguments. The revisionists (all of them) simply point out the LACK of evidence, thus the failure of the arguments that the Holocaust 做了 happen. To find a good selection of Revisionists and their ‘arguments’ go to https://jan27.org. [This site is still in the process of rebuilding itself after being lost temporarily through unforeseen circumstances, but the front page is now fully restored, thanks to Archive.org and Wayback Machine.] Those who claim millions were murdered in gas chambers, etc, etc. have the burden of proof, which holocausters have never succeeded at doing — on an even playing field.

    Your #2 makes a claim that is again an inversion of what the Jews and Holocausters do–not the revisionists. The revisionists stick with the same argument–pointing out lack of evidence and holding the holo historians accountable for their outrageous claims.

    #3 – Browning’s book is not a “document,” it’s a 故事 told by self-interested Poles about Polish suffering in 1942. Browning is Jewish.

    #4 – Beyond comment.

    You end by saying it’s your “personal belief” that the holocaust happened. So what? It’s my personal belief it didn’t. Your “guess usually turns out to be correct.” Sez who? So you’re guessing. Great.

    难以置信的。

    • 回复: @Colin Wright
  408. @simple mind

    你是对的,我是:

    我有一套相配的浅蓝色内裤和胸罩,颜色比旗子浅一点,但这是我目前能做的最好的。 丁字裤的背面非常窄,以至于塞子上显示了拉比 Chabbadnic 的形象——在幸福的记忆中。 巴鲁克·哈希姆,我只要想一想就能让它挤进挤出。

    有电话号码吗? 我一直都知道我加入了错误的单位。

    • 哈哈: Al Liguori
  409. John Wear 说:
    @Corvinus

    美国法医病理学家 Charles P. Larson 博士在达豪及其一些分营进行了尸检。 在达豪,拉森博士每天进行大约 25 次尸检,持续 10 天,并对另外 300 到 1,000 具尸体进行表面检查。 他只对那些看起来有问题的尸体进行了尸检。 拉尔森博士就达豪的这些尸检表示:

    “他们中的许多人死于斑疹伤寒。 达豪的火葬场跟不上尸体的燃烧。 他们没有足够的油来维持焚化炉的运转。 我发现一些受害者也死于肺结核。 他们都营养不良。 医疗设施最不完善。 没有卫生设施……

    我们到达那里后,在达豪周围流传着一个谣言,说许多囚犯都中毒了。 我做了很多毒理学分析以确定事实,并从大约 30 到 40 具尸体的横截面中取出器官并将它们送到巴黎陆军第一医学实验室进行分析,因为我在现场缺乏适当的设施。 报告的结果是负面的。 我找不到这些人在哪里中毒。 大多数人死于一种或另一种自然疾病……”

    拉尔森博士确实报告说,一些囚犯在一些德国集中营中被枪杀,集中营的生活条件恶劣。 犯人日均热量摄入远远达不到要求,导致不少犯人极度消瘦。 然而,由于拉森博士的尸检报告与灭绝或种族灭绝计划不一致,因此在纽伦堡试验中没有将其引入证据。

    • 同意: Mulegino1
    • 谢谢: Truth Vigilante
  410. @Corvinus

    Bait and switch. The British doctor never conducted autopsies. Rather, he studied their corpses.

    Detailed references please. I’m of the view that autopsies were performed.

    • 回复: @Petermx
    , @Corvinus
  411. @Psychotic Break

    ‘…Where does this ‘thinking’ come from? Isn’t there in you any sense of inner rebel? Has all your self-contrarianism been subsumed? Does the whole mass media model represent the ‘truth’ to you? I really can’t believe that! Surely you must have some inner doubts about some things…’

    I have many doubts about many things — more to the point, some unorthodox convictions.

    However, it doesn’t follow that therefore I should doubt all things. It’s been conventional wisdom for some time now that the earth rotates around the sun — I don’t feel obliged to insist on the reverse.

    There isn’t a formula. You can’t decide that the official story is always a lie any more than you can decide it’s always the truth.

    • 回复: @Psychotic Break
  412. @Fox

    ‘So, what is the ‘holocaust’? Persecution of Jews? The measures taken to segregate them from their ‘portable fatherland’ in the words of the (Jew) Heine? Is it the planned, systematic execution of mass murder, is it the six million gassed? Are you counting the anti-partisan actions which…’

    I just explained why I won’t argue about the Holocaust. Your response is to demand that I argue about the Holocaust.

    • 回复: @Fox
  413. @Carolyn Yeager

    ‘…#3 – Browning’s book is not a “document,” it’s a story told by self-interested Poles about Polish suffering in 1942. Browning is Jewish…’

    Actually, as I recall, 普通人 deals entirely with 德语 testimonies. In fact, that’s largely the point of the book. Browning is focusing on the behavior, actions, and attitudes of one specific group of men in the course of the Holocaust: the personnel of Reserve Police Battalion 101 in 1942 and 1943.

    I don’t see the claim that Christopher Browning is Jewish as conclusive; Ron Unz is Jewish — should we conclude that since he denies the reality of the Holocaust that it 做了 发生?

    However, I find it odd that a Jew would be named ‘Christopher.’ Brb…

    Well, Wikipedia doesn’t he’s Jewish. That’s not conclusive, though. Do you have any evidence to support your claim? As I say, I don’t see that as being of overwhelming significance — but I’d certainly file the fact, if you can demonstrate it is one.

    • 回复: @Carolyn Yeager
  414. @Carolyn Yeager

    Looks like they’ve quit, Carolyn.

    There was no ‘Holocaust’ after all, then. It was just a dream of some fraudulent guilt-tripping shysters foisted on us to bleed off money in the mean time and condition us to accept a one-world government ruled by Zionist bankers using a digitized-big pharma social credit control system. Luckily it was all just a bad dream!

    Phew! We got out of that one just in time, didn’t we?

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  415. Corvinus 说:
    @Petermx

    Why do you seek to harm Jewish babies?

    • 回复: @Colin Wright
  416. @Truth Vigilante

    ‘…CW, you clearly have not done any objective research on the matter. It seems that all you know about this issue comes courtesy of watching re-runs of Schindlers List and reading Anne Frank’s discredited and fraudulent diary…’

    My reading could be more extensive on the subject. I have read the following works that touch on one aspect of the Holocaust or another:

    克里斯托弗·布朗宁 普通人。

    Eric Johnson and Karl-Heinz Reuband, What We Knew.

    马克·马泽尔 Hitler’s Empire.

    吉塔·塞雷尼(Gitta Sereny) Albert Speer: His Battle with Truth.

    Halik Kochanski, The Eagle Unbowed: Poland and the Poles in the Second World War.

    Some other forgettable book supposedly about the Poles in World War Two — but it too wound up being all too much about the Jews.

    I have to admit that it doesn’t go much further than that — unless one wants to count fiction and passing references in texts about other things. I really find the Holocaust neither attractive nor interesting. However, I see every reason to believe it occurred.

    It’s kinda like plant debris decomposing to make compost. I’d be hard put to it explain 为什么 it does — but I’ve seen enough references to the fact to be sure it really does. The Holocaust is an unpleasant, rather dreary episode in human history. Knowing enough about it to be sure it happened and and to have a handle on about 什么 happened is enough; I have no interest in reading further.

  417. @Corvinus

    ‘Why do you seek to harm Jewish babies?’

    The British poached the diplomatic cables, not the babies.

  418. Corvinus 说:
    @anarchyst

    “ Anne Frank’s “diary” was partially written with a ball-point pen, not invented until the 1950s.”

    显然是错误的。

    The most extensive investigation was carried out in the first half of the 1980’s by the Netherlands Forensic Institute at the request of the National Institute for War Documentation. The results of this research were presented in a report of over 250 pages. The main section of the report is taken up with the findings of a detailed handwriting comparison, but a forensic document analysis was also carried out. The Diaries of Anne Frank, the so-called Critical Edition that was published by the NIOD in 1986, contains a 65-page summary of the Forensic Institute report.The NIOD concludes: ‘The report of the Netherlands Forensic Institute has convincingly demonstrated that both versions of the diary of Anne Frank were written by her in the years 1942 to 1944. The allegations that the diary was the work of someone else (…) are thus conclusively refuted.’ (The Diary of Anne Frank. The Revised Critical Edition, 2003, p. 186).

  419. Corvinus 说:
    @Psychotic Break

    当然,大屠杀发生了。 你只是不想相信。

    • 回复: @Badger Down
    , @Pat Kittle
  420. @Colin Wright

    That seems a fair and reasonable reply there, Colin. Thanks.

    I’m a bit older now that I used to be, or maybe its just my nature, but I doubt all the time. I doubt everything. It doesn’t mean I don’t have certainty on some things, but such latter things always seem to be hard won.

    There isn’t a formula. You can’t decide that the official story is always a lie any more than you can decide it’s always the truth.

    That’s right, we can’t, even though we invariably do. And I suppose the big question here is what is it that makes us go one way or the other. Some people say its money, some people say its a search for truth, some people live in fear, some people just want to go with the flow. I don’t really know why.

    I suspect, however, that you seem determined to go ‘with the flow, even though it might be a lie, and that presently you don’t really care even if it is’.

    祝你好运!

    • 回复: @Colin Wright
  421. @Patrick McNally

    I see. You don’t want to talk about the alleged crime “the murder of six million Jews by the Germans”. You want to switch to “gauging the number of Jewish deaths which may have occurred in WWII”.

    • 回复: @Patrick McNally
  422. @Colin Wright

    the orgy of bestiality the Soviets deliberately incited

    Why are you blaming Jews for that?

    • 回复: @Colin Wright
  423. @Corvinus

    A murder mystery. The accusations fly. Whodunnit? The Nasties. Murder weapon? We don’t need no stinking murder weapon. Yes you do. OK, gas chambers! Where are they? And where’s the body? Vaporized! Gone like WTC2. Any fingerprints, documents, evidence? Nah, we don’t need no stinking evidence, YOU provide evidence it didn’t happen. “I knew it didn’t really happen, but in my mind it did.” “And then I was somehow floating backwards, out of the gas chamber.”

  424. @Psychotic Break

    ‘…I suspect, however, that you seem determined to go ‘with the flow, even though it might be a lie, and that presently you don’t really care even if it is’.’

    It’s legitimate to point out that in this particular little frog pond, to ‘go with the flow’ would be to deny the Holocaust, not to aver its reality.

    Go ahead, count the posts. Here, I’m being the iconoclast. Both the prizes and the penalties are decidedly modest, so I’m not claiming any virtue points — but that is the situation.

    Are you going to bow to convention, or be a free man? Up to you…

    • 回复: @Psychotic Break
  425. @Colin Wright

    Well, I think you’ve got me on Browning being a Jew. I’ve mixed him up with Lawrence Rees, and I did it once before, as I now recall though had again forgotten! I have read that Lawrence Rees is Jewish, and note how the little box of personal data on the top right of 他的 Wiki page is reduced to only 3 items: birth date, alma mater and occupation. His parents are not mentioned in the biographical section, where he was born, etc. His biography starts with his university education! Many people do this on their Wiki page now, and it’s usually to cover up their Jewishness. But back to Browning.

    你打过电话了 普通人 a “document.” And who know the value of these “German testimonies?” The 2017 book seems to have gone down the memory hole already as it now quite cheap to buy new at Amazon. No, I don’t think it’s a critical success.

  426. @Badger Down

    ‘Why are you blaming Jews for that?’

    我是怎么做到的?

    I could — but that would lead us further afield. When did I?

  427. @Colin Wright

    Oh wow, I’m shocked. Truly I am. You know nothing about this subject, yet you continually sound off about it! You’re active in every comment thread I’ve been in here that discusses Holocaust. (I participate in most of them, lol)

    I will never again read your comments on this topic! I’m so angry at what a piece of cr__ you are. Your terrible choice of books is heavy on Poland and contains not a single revisionist work. Are you another cryptic Pole? Which would explain why you take an interest in Holocaust threads. I hope you will be shunned from now on by all good truth-seekers and truth tellers. Thanks to TV for drawing this confession out of you.

    • 回复: @Colin Wright
  428. Fox 说:
    @Colin Wright

    Just say what it is for you and don’t play the innocent virgin who is beating around the bush.
    If you use “the holocaust” as an elastic notion then one never knows whether you are just engaging in literary hyperbole or are a hardcore proponent of the Jewish and PC position of the six million gassed according to a planned and carefully laid program.
    “You don’t argue about the holocaust”. But you talk about it – a lot. I don’t argue about it either but I want to know what you mean by it, since you talk so much about it. You can state it in one sentence, you can use commas, semicolons and hyphens if needed.
    If you don’t know what you mean, then don’t talk about it, if you do, but don’t want to say then you are producing polemics, i.e., a speech into a general direction.

    • 同意: Carolyn Yeager
  429. @Carolyn Yeager

    ‘…I will never again read your comments on this topic! I’m so angry at what a piece of cr__ you are. Your terrible choice of books is heavy on Poland and contains not a single revisionist work. Are you another cryptic Pole? Which would explain why you take an interest in Holocaust threads. I hope you will be shunned from now on by all good truth-seekers and truth tellers. Thanks to TV for drawing this confession out of you.’

    I suppose that’s as close to a concession speech as we’re going to get out of you.

    你可以祝贺我竞选成功,并表达你对我的政府成功的有点不真诚的祝愿。

    • 回复: @Wielgus
  430. Ron Unz 说:

    Given these disputes over exactly when the Holocaust narrative was established, I think we might find a useful analogy in America’s current gender-lunacy. These days, claiming that only women can give birth is a controversial and even dangerous position to take. It can get you purged from social media and even fired from your job. I think there are calls for prosecuting such “hate speech” in Britain.

    Now this ideological regime was only recently established, but if someone did research they could discover roughly similar notions had long been present in narrower segments of the population. For example, I remember that the children’s book 希瑟有两个妈妈 caused a major media controversy back in the 1990s. But ideas that were then limited to a small slice of the population and widely ridiculed by the broader public gradually became more and more powerful and then totally dominant in the last few years.

    • 回复: @Petermx
    , @Badger Down
  431. Petermx 说:
    @Carolyn Yeager

    Which is worse? At the trial they treated the so called “gassings” as indisputable facts. The prosecution was not required to prove these so called facts. They were simply said to be facts. They could have done autopsies and obviously if they were really interested in the truth, they would have performed them. Or, maybe they did and then when the results were negative they said they never performed them. I don’t know. Obviously, the prosecution were liars and not interested in the truth, but rather convictions.

  432. Petermx 说:
    @Ukraine Tiger

    I actually did burst out laughing at that comment. Saying that used to be considered unacceptable but he’s probably White so I guess it’s OK now.

  433. Petermx 说:
    @Ron Unz

    Yes, and those segments of the population that have those ideas put in their heads before anyone else are most likely university students who will later work in more influential positions such as teachers, university professors and journalists for newspapers, etc. so the rest of the population can be “educated”.

    I have my own example. About seven months ago I got into a conversation with an Englishman who found it extremely offensive to say Europe used to be a continent of Whites. He suggested non-Whites had always been a part of Europe’s population. That was news to me. Suggesting otherwise may be a hate crime eventually too.

  434. Sparkon 说:

    A 仔细看 Google Books N-Gram Viewer indicates the word “大屠杀” (case insensitive) began to appear around 1960, give or take, following a small blip during and after WWII, with usage of the term increasing very sharply during the 1970s, and really taking off during the 1980s and 1990s.

    Well, that may not settle it, but it’s a good start.

    • 回复: @Sparkon
    , @Fox
  435. Sepp 说:
    @Fox

    很棒的评论。

    The Czechs and the Poles started already with getting the Germans out of the territory of their new states beginning in 1919. Would that be a ‘holocaust’ if it had been directed at Jews, but just an occurrence of little interest since it was directed at other peoples?

    Herschel Grynszpan, the Jewish assassin of diplomat Ernst von Rath in Paris in 1938, claimed that he did so because Germany were going to deport his parents, Jews, back to Poland. They had entered Germany illegally in 1919.

    So there were expulsions of Jews going on in Eastern Europe after WWI. Of course Jews are now trying to drag the Poles into the cesspool of “Holocaust guilt” for their behavior during WWII. Of course Jews are never held to account for their behavior as communists. Even as Pedophiles Jews ALWAYS cover up for each other, as is evidenced by Epstein and Maxwell.

    • 回复: @Carolyn Yeager
    , @Fox
  436. Sepp 说:
    @Ukraine Tiger

    He could be an Australian Jew too. Or more correctly, a C-Jew pretending to be Australian. They perform this same feat in goy societies all across the planet.

    He could also be a Jewish Hasbara Troll in Tel Aviv using an Australian handle as a cover. His inane and idiotic comments are evidence of this, and that is why I think he is a nasty Hebrew supremacist paid to lie and bait goyim and ruin their discussions with cognitive dissonance.

  437. @Ron Unz

    Is there really much doubt on reasoning that you would normally find convincing that the Chinese government is doing to the Uighurs something which the general run of non Chinese bien pensants would criticise as contrary to human rights? After all it does seem that foreigners are not allowed to go and see what is happening, e.g. in buildings filmed from satellites which are thought to be reeducation centres?

    Like former President Trump I’m quite happy with the idea that those afflicted by a primitive religion (one they were converted to from Buddhism by conquest it seems) should be educated by the CCP equivalent of the missionaries who did the same for indigenes all over the world, for which purpose they were “concentrated”. Unfortunately the UN and other worthy bodies seem to have decided that the word genocide applies to such beneficence, so it is not surprising that China bridles at the idea that they need supervision.

    I’m not sure what to make of your point, if there is a point, in equating those who carry on about Uighur Genocide with those who still carry on about what is called the Holocaust.

  438. @Colin Wright

    Hi Colin.

    No one’s actually hung up on six million, that I can see.

    Au contraire, Zionist Jews are totally hung up on the “6 million”. It’s irrelevant how many Jews actually died in WWII, it was always going to be 6 million. The 6M figure is symbolic (crucial to the Jewish objective of creating “Israel”) and is based on a “prophecy” contained in the Torah (Leviticus 25:10) that states, “You shall return”.

    Without the totally symbolic number of 6 million there probably wouldn’t be a country called Israel sitting on stolen Palestinian land today.

    https://jewishweek.timesofisrael.com/the-joy-of-six/

    • 同意: John Wear, Fox
  439. Pat Kittle 说:
    @Corvinus

    你很高兴欧洲人现在在监狱里,仅仅因为质疑(((你的二战版本)))。

    如果你真的相信你的“大屠杀”寓言,你会欢迎它的调查——而不是对调查人员的监禁。

    难怪你们骗子被普遍鄙视。

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  440. Goyboy 说:

    Read this a few days ago.
    Better show my appreciation by saying I’m very pleased I did.

  441. @Psychotic Break

    What’s PC about that selling?

    And what’s presumptuous about assuming that you didn’t see Auschwitz/Auschwicz before 1945?

    Do you have an ADHD problem?

    • 回复: @Psychotic Break
  442. Anon[336]• 免责声明 说:
    @Anonymous

    Perhaps he is referring to Obama’s memoir, his uncle apparently served in the Red Army, as Obama claimed he helped “liberate” Auschwitz (!).

    Frank Marshall Davis had a brother that fought for the Soviets?

    Wow, history is kewl!

  443. @Corvinus

    科瓦努斯写道:

    “Much proof was furnished during the Zundel trial in Toronto in 1985…”

    Which has been discredited.

    So, because your hero (the serial liar Deborah Lipstadt) disagrees with the evidence, in your mind it’s discredited.

    At the end of the day, there is unanimity among objective observers that the evidence that came out during the Zundel trial absolutely gutted the conventional Holocaust narrative.

    That’s why they went out of their way to make an example of Zundel, leading to his premature death.

    • 同意: John Wear
    • 回复: @Corvinus
  444. Anon[336]• 免责声明 说:
    @Badger Down

    Now a good reply would have been to provide evidence for the murder of 6m Jews, or at least 4m.

    Since this is an actual production-ops problem, through-put was probably time sensitive – so I’m guessing it was somewhat of a rushed job.

    That means these cremains were probably un-cremulated – which means big bits & chunks of Joos in the final product.
    ______________________

    Let’s see, the average weight of a cremated body, turned to ash, is approximately 5 to 10 lbs (depending on actual Joo size).

    We’ll say 5 lbs for the Camp Joos. in this case, cuz they was all hungry and such.
    ______________________

    So, that makes 6,000,000 x 5 . . . carry the one . . . double checking . . . checking it twice . . .

    Okay, if my maff is correct, that means there are about 30,000,000 lbs. of dehydrated Joos out there . . . somewhere.
    ______________________

    Now, where would one hide 30,000,000 lbs of chunky chosen soylent ash, that is the question?

    Did anyone check under the throw-rug in the orchestra pit?

    • 回复: @HdC
  445. @Incitatus

    Better to figure how Germans were co-opted by extremists 1918-33. Where did it end up?

    I think consideration of that might help ease our host towards a less muddled view, when, now, he seems to find importance in verbal questions like when “Holocaust” was born as something to believe in .

    I say tha partly because it is the essence of the horror, as legitimately felt and not beaten up, that the nation of Schiller and Goethe (and Beethoven and Koch and…) could have come to be governed as it was from 1933 to 1955 and with such a substantial proportion of the population behaving as if they were still in the ancient world of exterminatory killing of the other tribe.

    Maybe it can be said that, whatever the strength of the primitive anti-Semitic views able to be stirred in much of Germany’s Christian 99% the critical points were the defeat of Germany in WW1, and the Wall Street crash of 1929 with the disastrously incompetent monetary policies that followed and produced disaster in Germany. Add Hitler’s ability as an orator (attested to by a German speaking master at my school though I find it hard to believe) and his successful risk taking proto-Keynesian spending which built his popularity and you have the setup for Hitler’s SS henchmen to be able to do anything.

  446. Sparkon 说:
    @Sparkon

    A close look at Google Books N-Gram Viewer indicates the word “Holocaust” (不区分大小写) began to appear around 1960, give or take…

    My look at Google Books N-Gram viewer may not have been close enough. I mistakenly described the results I posted as “case-insensitive,” when in fact they were case sensitive, i.e. for “Holocaust” with a capital H.

    What threw me off is the “case-insensitive” thingy displayed by the GB NGV is inactive (white) until you click on it, whereupon it turns blue, and the utility then returns results that are 不区分大小写。

    If you do that for the GB NGV link I posted, it becomes apparent that usage of “holocaust” (with a small h) began to increase, ever so slightly, just before WWII, but the big increase, fueled by the special, capital H variety, seems to have begun, slowly at first, around or just before 1960, about the same time my class received that odd, one-time lecture from my grade school nun about Germans gassing Jews.

    The capitalized version is is a special kind of holocaust reserved solely for Jews being exterminated by the Germans, or Nazis, if you prefer, during WWII, and turned into bars of soap, lampshades, and even shrunken heads. Only Jews can suffer like that, doncha know?

  447. @Colin Wright

    I’ve never heard of any of the authors or book titles on your Holohoax bibliography.

    It looks like the officially sanctioned Holohoax reading list issued by B’nai B’rith or the ADL, recommended reading for all yeshivas and Talmudic indoctrination centres.

    Little wonder that you’re as clueless as commenter Corvanus on this topic.

    • 哈哈: Colin Wright
  448. Anon[336]• 免责声明 说:
    @Colin Wright

    My reading could be more extensive on the subject.

    20世纪的骗局 is a fine place to start, I read it 35 years ago as my intro.

    I believe Ron has made it available here for download, if memory serves.

    • 同意: Carolyn Yeager, John Wear
  449. @Wizard of Oz

    What’s PC about that selling?

    Nothing, I suppose. People have been selling for thousands of years.

    • 巨魔: Wizard of Oz
  450. @Colin Wright

    That’s an interesting but somewhat artificial and fatuous division point.

    The central point of the essay is that there were three ‘holocausts’; the first two clearly being hoaxes, even if one had no interest in examining the third honestly, it is a fair chance that that too is a hoax.

    Although, of course, I do fear the future: its digitisation, its mass-medication, its ultra-control, both intimate and social within this greater context of lies, there is however a silver lining. That is that ordinary Jews (other than those very few who own the super corporations) are to play no special role in this future order. Although it serves a useful function presently, in this future the ‘holocaust’ will incrementally be side-lined and ultimately assigned to the memory-hole, in the same way mementos of western (actually Jewish-owned) African slavery are being systematically erased. This is pretty much in line with the writing of Marx concerning the subsequent role and fate of the Jews.

    If any physical proof of this were needed, it is the mass fanatical vaccination of the citizens of Israel. There is much uncertainty as to exactly how damaging these shots actually might be, but they are nevertheless primarily a tool of control. Shabbat-goys such as you certainly won’t stand a chance, however cool or sexy obedience might be presently.

    I can always at least praise and thank the Almighty Creator that I never went for my jabs.

    • 回复: @Colin Wright
  451. @Petermx

    Hi Peter, I wanted to reply to this earlier, but couldn’t.
    I never watched McHale’s Navy. If you liked it maybe I would have too.
    My father, who seldom watched TV and had a clear and well-deserved grudge against Jews in business, would still watch them if he found them entertaining enough. He loved All in the Family, especially interaction between Archie and Meathead, played by Jew Rob Reiner. He had also been a big fan of Sid Caesar in that variety “Show of Shows” in the fifties (before your time – you should look it up). He really laughed at that. And Caesar is known as something as a comedic genius.

    It’s interesting to learn that you grew up in the US. I kinda had the impression you were in Germany or had been.

    • 回复: @Petermx
  452. @Sepp

    I concur, this is an excellent approach. We MUST be able to hold Jews accountable like everyone else is held accountable. Jews have figured out how to absolve themselves, no matter what it is. I believe that power/ability comes from having enough (loyal) Jews in sensitive places to either hire more and to protect others. Most Jews ARE loyal; it has been drilled into them for centuries. In this way, their power keeps growing.

    Today’s UR article by Philip Giraldi is the best piece from him I’ve ever seen. He’s finally delivering the goods re Jewish Power, not only in the interests of Palestinians, etc. Follow the link he provides to the website for the abomination called the US Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad (USCPAHA). You’ll see Jewish privilege on steroids as Jews sell 他们自己的兴趣 as American interests with the tax dollars of the American people. Jews are blatantly manipulating their benefit as America’s benefit!

    The takeover seems to be complete, because of that inexcusable Fear of the Jews. I believe we need to become bolder, along with smarter, and work across all other racial lines. It’s in everyone’s interest. STOP SPECIAL TREATMENT FOR JEWS.

    • 回复: @Anon
  453. @Sepp

    ” . . . 1949 would also have been after the creation of Israel and its recognition by Truman . . .”

    Speaking of Truman, that Pendergast machine hack: He recognized Israel in 1948 in return for \$2 million in campaign contributions from pro-Zionist sources.

    • 同意: Sepp
  454. @Psychotic Break

    ‘…The central point of the essay is that there were three ‘holocausts’; the first two clearly being hoaxes, even if one had no interest in examining the third honestly, it is a fair chance that that too is a hoax…’

    Here, what is not in dispute is that previous claims of atrocities had proven to be more or less exaggerated. As a result, the wartime reports of the Holocaust met with considerable skepticism.

    • 哈哈: Psychotic Break
    • 回复: @Psychotic Break
  455. Petermx 说:
    @Carolyn Yeager

    I remember Sid Caesar, I think from some movies. He was very funny. I think my mother liked him too. My older brother was born in Germany. Of all of us, he is the least interested in Germany and such things. He accepts and is comfortable with the prevalent narrative and uncomfortable with my views. We had never discussed such things until recently but it shouldn’t ruin our relationship. The other three of us were born in the US. I am the one the most interested in history, Germany, etc. and the only one with unconventional views. If my parents were still alive my three siblings might not hold the conventional views that they do. My parents were there and never witnessed anything as told by conventional historians. Unfortunately, my parents died or were too old to benefit from the internet and learn of revisionists. My father would have been especially interested in them. I recall he read John Toland’s book on Hitler many years ago and David Irving’s book on Rommel.

    • 回复: @Carolyn Yeager
  456. Fox 说:
    @Sparkon

    I have read the word ‘holocaust’ repeatedly in writings from before and in the immediately following years of 1945. However, it was in the sense of “great, wholesale, violent destruction, slaughter” and applied to the waste of life and hope and that which makes life desirable. It was not specifically used in conjunction with Jews. I think I read it, for example, in a book by General J.F.C.Fuller, the British military writer.

  457. @Colin Wright

    Thank you. They were skeptical and they still are, ever increasingly so. Just like about who really did 9/11; the whole ZOG state, or a handful of loser Arab boys based in a remote cave?

    • 回复: @Colin Wright
  458. geokat62 说:

    埃里克·斯特里克(Eric Striker)发表的电报评论:

    Jews are giving more ground on the Holocaust.

    Documentaries like this are tactical retreats to save the broader narrative.

    There is fascinating insight here that encapsulates why an objective and honest discussion on the Holocaust has been made impossible.

    The mainstream historians told the Israeli director, who argues that the 6 million figure is “symbolic” rather than historical record, not to make the film because it could politically hurt Jews. They don’t want this film to be shown outside of Israel.

    I briefly worked with and got to know some notable history academics years ago, you would be surprised at how much they concede in private.

    A new book that came out last year, Stalin’s War by award winning historian Sean McMeekin, concedes loads of “revisionist” arguments about FDR, the USSR, Churchill, etc.

    McMeekin still clings to the Holocaust (he has to), but emphasizes the “Holocaust by bullets”, which is a cope popularized in 2008 by Patrick Desbois.

    Desbois is the Vatican’s “interfaith” emissary to the Jewish community and not an actual trained historian or forensic specialist.

    “Holocaust by bullets” de-emphasizes the gas chamber story and instead makes the at least more plausible (but still false) claim that the Nazis shot millions of Jews on the Eastern front. It is mentioned in this piece.

    At bare minimum, there seems to be a quiet emerging consensus developing to retire the embarrassing gas chamber hoax without admitting it is false, as it is scientifically and rationally indefensible.

    https://archive.is/Rwj0j

    https://t.me/EricStrikerTRS/13358

    • 谢谢: John Wear
    • 回复: @SolontoCroesus
  459. @Petermx

    I’m enjoying this conversation with you, Peter. We share a lot in common. I’m probably 10-12 years ahead of you, maybe more, but that’s close enough after a certain age. I’m also the one most interested in history — family history and German (especially 3rd Reich) history — and TRUTH. I searched for mostly spiritual truth before the Internet, when I turned to history and “conspiratorial” topics. I’m the middle child, 2nd consecutive daughter; that’s sometimes classified as the “lost child.” It fits because I was never satisfied with the ‘ordinary’ (as I saw it) aspirations in life that most are. I was always searching for something higher.

    I can understand that you are able to accept the “no-go area” with your brother bc your need to have your questions answered is so strong. Truth has always been my favorite, most meaningful word, and when applied to what was done to Germany, it’s taken on a more urgent application. I never tire or become bored with exposing the horrible “Holocaust” lie. The truth is crystal clear to me … which makes it harder to accept the 缺乏兴趣 of others, but I do the best I can to understand it.

    The world, history and human actions are riddled with lies (Denial). What is a lie but the denial of truth. Just like Colin Wright has learned to do, 信徒 practice their denial by turning it back onto the truth seekers, such as by calling us 旦尼尔。 It’s not wrongly said that the Devil is a liar and a trickster. I really do not ascribe to the belief that such persons are sincere and simply ‘think differently.’ Someone like your older brother is in fear; they all fear disrupting their lives.

    I’m really glad to have made your acquaintance and read so many of your posts here on Unz. You are 可信, someone who can be counted on. :-))

    • 回复: @Petermx
  460. HdC 说:
    @Anon

    By and large normal cremation does not destroy the teeth nor the large bones.
    The idea that the result of cremation is a grey homogeneous powder stems from the fact that the remains of commercial cremations are pulverized to make them into powder.
    There is no evidence at all that such pulverizers existed in any concentration camp.
    Consequently there should be mountains, well, certainly large ant hills, of teeth and bone fragments. This is what I would call verifiable forensic evidence. I’ve never seen any, nor been referred to places where I might see them.

    • 回复: @Anon
  461. @Johnny Douglas

    “Without the totally symbolic number of 6 million there probably wouldn’t be a country called Israel sitting on stolen Palestinian land today.”

    好的!

  462. @geokat62

    see HERE re Desbois (specifically, who bought him and for how much)
    https://www.unz.com/article/my-paper-on-jewish-influence-blows-up/#comment-5107272

    -
    Speaking of Who bought Whom and for How Much: a Jewish outfit whose head, Zevi Weiss, was from Canton, Ohio (as was Stuart Levey, who set up US Treasury department to “sanction” Iran and others Israel doesn’t like) — in ~1995 Weiss & friends Christopher Browning —

    -educated at Univ. of Wisconsin (which has a department started by George Mosse, with ‘holocaust reparations’ money, to ‘advance Jewish interests)

    -Catholic (Irish, if I recall correctly)

    -student of German history

    Weiss approached Browning, who was teaching at Northwestern at the time.

    Weiss ponied up \$3000. (Three Thousand dollars) for a substitute to teach Browning’s classes while Browning was taken to Israel to learn how to “teach holocaust.” https://hef.northwestern.edu/about/news/in-memoriam-theodore-z.-weiss1.html

    On the strength of this favorable investment, Weiss next took his act to Notre Dame. I’ve forgotten the name of the sap recruited to publish and preach holocaust at Notre Dame, but holocaustianity is dug in deep at Our Lady’s used-to-be-Catholic university.
    https://news.nd.edu/news/notre-dame-will-host-international-academic-conference-on-the-impact-of-the-holocaust-experience-on-jews-and-christians/

    Next, the Holocaust Education Foundation took on the US Military Academies, where holocaust awareness was installed in the curriculum at West Point and the Air Force academy (probably Naval Academy as well, but faculty there is frequently too drunk to know what is going on; at least that was my impression back in the early 1970s).

    Some years ago Thane Rosenbaum hosted a particularly insulting forum from a hall at Fordham University, but I have no information on whether the Frankfurter school’s “March thru the Institutions” has left behind a Jewish institute to mark its March thru Fordham.

    As noted in the first link posted, holocaustism is entrenched at Georgetown University, formerly a star in the Catholic-Jesuit constellation. That act of perfidy was far more costly than Browning’s — You Can Always Tell a Jesuit . . . (but you can’t tell him much).

    -
    Final, complex thought on this multi-part comment: It’s too bad P C Roberts is not allowing comments to his 自由佛罗里达可以生存吗?

    Roberts reports that widely-acclaimed governor of Florida Ron DeSantis is being- or will be- challenged for governorship by a Jewish woman who may be expected to reverse DeSantis’s policies on virus, masks, vaccine, and the like.

    I read Roberts’s cautionary tale on the same day that I came across this 3-months old item from Christian Picciolini:
    I’m Closing Free Radicals Project — Here Are My Reasons, and Why a Shift in Focus is Needed.
    Who is Chris Picciolini and why does he matter?

    Picciolini is a “reformed” white supremecist-neo-Nazi anti-semite evil evil evil person. ADL found him, rescued him, gave him a book deal, set him up for interviews all over the place, including with that model of decorum, Sarah Silverman as well as the pronouned preacher at a nearby Unitarian church. And Picciolini ground that organ for his Jewish masters like a good little trained monkey.
    If Picciolini is not “Christian” and Italian, every effort was made to dress him up like one.

    Jews like Italian front-men.
    Think: Fiorello LaGuardia.
    Think: Anthony Fauci
    Think: Rudy Giuliani
    Think: Benito Mussolini (Yes, Jews loved him; Jabotinsky was especially enamored of Mussolini’s “muscular” policies.)

    Some bigot on Pat Lang’s blog commented recently:
    https://turcopolier.com/bidens-approval-rating-at-33-percent-quinnipiac-poll/#comment-194518

    “If you allow my uninformed opinion, knowing nothing of De Santis background, these are time of rules not law, times of mafias, like inmediately after the fall of the USSR.

    De Santis, as governor of Florida, may have the knowhow to treat with these elements.
    I would venture that even he has the appropiate face to deal with such fauna. . . .
    De Santis is the guy, and will reap a lot of support in Europe.”

    Get it? If you’re Eye-talian, or have the “appropriate face,” you can deal with “mafia.”

    BUT: Mussolini and his non-Jewish consort were hanged upside-down;
    Giuliani’s apartment was tossed by FBI;
    ADL having recouped its investment, Chris Picciolini is on his own; maybe he can join #MeToo.

    So I say to Paul Craig Roberts and his plea that Floridians re-elect DeSantis —

    “In the next election for governor, DeSantis’ Democrat opponent is likely to be a Jew, Nikki Fried. Fried regards DeSantis as an “authoritarian dictator who is borderline fascist”

    Florida is already “likely to be dominated by Jews” — it may be that DeSantis is trying to walk a tightrope, but
    he DID take his entire Cabinet to TelAviv to pay his respects . . .
    he DID sign holocaust education for Florida school children legislation
    https://floridapolitics.com/archives/343286-gov-desantis-signs-holocaust-ocoee-massacre-education-bill/
    he DID allow the Chabad-rabbis foot-in-the-door with Jewish-sponsored Moment of Silence legislation

    IMO DeSantis’ most graceful way to avoid being Mussolini d is to be defeated by Nikki Fried.

    Florida is already in the throes of a real estate pump-and-dump. Let Fried preside over the Dump.

    I recently learned of an Italian pastry chef from Brooklyn who pulled up stakes and moved to Italy, where he owns and runs a vineyard and vintner.
    If DeSantis wants to live a fulfilling life; If DeSantis wants to live a life of integrity; if DeSantis wants to ensure sound upbringing, solid memories for his family, get out of politics, Ron DeSantis; Jews don’t deserve you: you’re too nice a guy to end up dangling upside down at a gas station.

    Pretty sure Chris Browning is nearing retirement. He — or Rev. Father Patrick Desbois — deserves the Rope treatment far more than you do.

    • 回复: @geokat62
    , @Anon
  463. Druid55 说:
    @Colin Wright

    Just like their torah. Eventually all these lies may be committed to the torah as another chapter.

  464. @Ron Unz

    一个关键的区别是,由于美国的面积和资源比德国大得多, 结果在很大程度上决定了 一旦我们的国家能够在压倒性的民众反对下挑起战争。

    在过去的几周里,我一直在认真思考这个问题。 毫无疑问: 德国 已经输掉了战争。 人们只需要看看这个被占领的附庸国的悲惨状态,它被迫资助以色列海军,其附庸媒体试图美化的无能和怪诞的木偶越来越令人尴尬。 外交部长安娜莱娜·贝尔博克……有谁会相信这不是对被占领人民的民主模拟?

    但是我们不必这么说吗 希特勒 到现在为止,纳粹至少取得了一场代价高昂的胜利? 经过多年的战争同等行动,向第三帝国宣战或向第三帝国宣战的所有大国在哪里? 大英帝国:解散。 苏联:解体。 法国:只是其辉煌过去的影子。 波兰:一个有趣的顺从附庸。 美国呢? 它从未像现在这样接近第二次内战,它被它设计用来破坏德国精神的变异心理战武器从内部撕裂。 它设计用来摧毁德国文化的心理病毒现在正在摧毁它自己的文化。 “Wer anderen eine Grube gräbt, fällt selbst hinein!”,俗话说。
    在这一点上,还有什么比成为反希特勒主义者的讽刺漫画让这个最人为的国家团结在一起的呢? 当然不再是种族、文化甚至宗教。 也许它的技术优势,就目前而言,它的经济,我也支持这一评估,甚至反对黑田东彦自己的评估,确实显示出与日本泡沫经济的强烈相似之处。 毕竟,黑田东彦作为美国附庸国的显赫人物,不得不对美国根深蒂固、寄生于敌对的精英阶层的真实性质有所妥协。 然而,他对中国的看法显然是正确的。

    https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/159841/adbi-wp521.pdf
    https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/books/086/10011-9781589068407-en/ch04.xml?tabs=fulltext

    如果希特勒本人根本没有打算与美国开战,更不用说与他曾钦佩并视其为兄弟的英国开战,这无疑是一个悲惨的结果。 他甚至准备打破与日本的联盟,重新征服所有失去的英国领土。 但是“匈奴”必须受到惩罚,不是吗? 而在德美同盟成员被梅耶兰克西周围的犹太裔美国黑手党暗杀之后,随后是美国最高级别的针对同盟的国家恐怖主义,以及针对德国种族的种族灭绝性盎格鲁-犹太复国主义种族战争。圣经的世界秩序,这种命运并非没有正义。 更可悲的是,这一代的普通士兵和派往伊拉克的士兵一样受骗。 但正如我们过去讨论过的那样:在某些时候,75% 的美国公众认为复兴党萨达姆侯赛因与 9/11 事件有关,据称并且不顾一切可能性和证据,由伊斯兰极端分子奥萨马·本·拉登处决.

    中国+俄罗斯可能比美国及其腐朽的附庸更强大

    我也相信。 鉴于在朝鲜战争中处于或接近巅峰的美国几乎没有与中国陷入僵局,当时它确实还是一个发展中国家。 相信美国在孤立的斗争中可能实际上已经输给了第三帝国,这也不是太不现实。 只要卡尔弗里德里希冯魏茨泽克教授和爱德华泰勒博士教授都证实了其核计划的内部没有叛国罪。 如果要相信“餐桌会谈”,希特勒本人可能不会介意全球领导权流向东亚。 毕竟,如果传统的德国仰望任何人,那就是东亚:印度、中国和日本。 这符合已故卡尔·施密特在《党派理论》中提出的愿景,其中他甚至赞扬了毛泽东。 中国控制了东方,欧洲控制了中部,美国控制了西方。

    https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1552913.Theory_of_the_Partisan

    您的杰出作家史蒂夫·塞勒(Steve Sailor)可能会向您的读者讲述德国人对政治极端主义的倾向,就在同一天,在我所在的州内,每个人都必须在半径 600 米的范围内撤离,因为另一个被我们光荣的“解放者”挖出的 Fliegerbombe留下作为临别礼物,而 Vdare 的 David Böhm 可能希望所有黑人都可以像他的祖先对我的家人和数百万其他 Sudetengermans 所做的那样从美国种族清洗。 但我们都知道,这些反德国的、经常是种族灭绝的咆哮是死者的无能为力的强硬谈话。 我不仅活到足以见证苏联的终结,我也将活到足以见证美帝国的终结。 你也知道。

    还有别的东西:我可以看任何关于希特勒或武装党卫军的日文 YouTube 视频,这是一个无休止的评论专栏,关于党卫军有多酷,希特勒是多么出色的演讲者和领导人,他们如何如果生活在那个时代,他会投票给他。 这就是规范内容! 你可以想象日本会机的想法。 这就是你,美国,作为你在东亚唯一有意义的盟友。 如果中国人像你一直提醒我们的那样聪明,他们就会知道如何利用这一点,真正实现日本在中国领导下以日本为他们最自豪的王子的共同繁荣区的雄心壮志。 好吧,如果不是,他们毕竟只是复仇主义的共产主义者,就像他们是太多短视的日本民族主义者一样,那么他们将被遏制。 由双方决定我们共同的未来。

    美好的一天!

    • 同意: HdC
    • 谢谢: SolontoCroesus, Fox, mark green
    • 回复: @Sepp
  465. Corvinus 说:
    @Pat Kittle

    不是我的版本,只是事实。 我明确表示,每个主权国家都可以就大屠杀错误信息做出自己的决定。 在美国,我反对以第一修正案为由监禁你们的弟兄。 我已经表明了我的立场。

    现在,你为什么支持谋杀犹太婴儿?

    • 回复: @Pat Kittle
  466. Corvinus 说:
    @Carolyn Yeager

    There is no direct mention of autopsies being conducted by Barton himself at Belsen, nor by the British medical students who were there. If you have specific sources to the contrary, please reveal.

    https://www.historiography-project.com/books/19880000-the-false-news-trial/15barton

    —(Barton) believed the leaders of Nazi Germany, such as Adolf Hitler and Goebbels, were masters at propaganda and agreed that they elevated it to a new science. He agreed that part of the propaganda message was that the Jews were the cause of Germany’s problems, that they used a variety of techniques to convince the populace that that was the case, that they used very graphic and insulting publications like Der Stürmer which parodied the archetypal Jew and had cartoons of Jewish people. He thought it was not parody, but an attempt to increase the hatred against one group by giving them qualities they didn’t have, such as race. It was destruction of reputation, which in his opinion, was entirely unwarranted. It was easy to satisfy it in the minds of less intelligent people, the less critical people, because intelligence and criticism weren’t in the same dimension. (21-5182, 5183, 5184)—

    https://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/news-and-features/blogs/detail/history-archives-and-library-blog/2020/04/14/medical-students-at-belsen

    —The Red Cross had recruited 96 London medical students to assist with famine relief in Holland. But Belsen was in the news. Descriptions of the situation there were so appalling that many did not know what to believe and wondered if the reports were anti-German propaganda. With minimal briefing, the students were diverted to Belsen. After the excitement of being flown in Dakotas to Celle in North Germany (most had never been in a plane before) they began work on 2 May. Most students were allocated a hut with several hundred occupants, and some worked in the dispensary, cookhouse or post-mortem room. In the huts, despite the smell and language barriers, they aimed to assess each person, feed them, treat their medical and surgical disorders (morphine for coughs, diarrhoea and pain; abscesses incised with razor blades) and help remove the dead then clean and creosote vacated floor space. When fed with liquid nutritional mixtures, using a spoon or a teapot spout if necessary, the inmates (we should now call them patients) put on weight, unless they had tuberculosis, typhus or other infections. Their morale improved and mortality fell rapidly to under 100 per day. Many then passed through a “human laundry” housed in the stables before being transferred to the temporary hospital in nearby barracks.—

    • 回复: @John Wear
  467. John Wear 说:
    @Corvinus

    2 年 1945 月 1942 日,英国医生拉塞尔·巴顿 (Russell Barton) 博士是一名英国医生,后来成为美国精神病学家,他作为一名年轻的医科学生随英军进入卑尔根-贝尔森。 一些囚犯已经死亡并堆积在小屋外,另一些则处于垂死、疾病和脱水的不同阶段。 巴顿检查了营地设备齐全的厨房,发现记录簿列出了 XNUMX 年以来烹饪和分发的食物。巴顿博士从他对营地记录的检查中确定,卑尔根贝尔森没有故意实施饥饿政策.

    Dr. Barton made inquiries with inmates, including Jewish doctors, who told him that Bergen-Belsen had not been too bad until the autumn of 1944. Then, as the Russian armies were advancing, the inmates said they had been given the choice of remaining in the camps about to be overrun by the Soviets or being repatriated back to Germany. Many chose to return to Germany. As a result, from the autumn of 1944 to early 1945, some 53,000 people were moved into Bergen-Belsen, which had room for only 3,000 inmates. The overcrowding was extreme and the staff at the camp resented it. Josef Kramer, the commandant of Bergen-Belsen, and Dr. Fritz Klein, the medical doctor at the camp, didn’t know what to do with the huge influx of inmates. Dr. Barton concluded that the horrific conditions at Bergen-Belsen were attributable to overcrowding and the collapse of the German economy at the end of the war rather than to an intentional program of extermination.

    Bergen-Belsen is typical of the other German camps. The sharp increase in the number of deaths at the camps in 1945 was due to disease and overcrowding rather than an extermination program. The woeful scenes on liberation of the camps were not typical of camp conditions throughout their existence. By the end of the war, as many as two or three inmates were sleeping on a single plank, three tiers to a bunk, in packed wooden barracks. Ill-clothed and ill-fed, exposed to virulent epidemics, camp inmates were dying in horrifying numbers throughout the last months of the war.

    • 同意: HdC
    • 谢谢: Carolyn Yeager
    • 回复: @Corvinus
    , @Incitatus
  468. @John Wear

    ” . . . However, since Dr. Larson’s autopsy reports were inconsistent with a program of extermination or genocide, they were not introduced into evidence at the Nuremberg trials.”

    I’ve read Larson’s biography “Crime Doctor: Dr. Charles P. Larson, World’s Foremost Medical Detective, Reports from His Crime File” by John D. McCallum (1978). His findings didn’t give with the

  469. geokat62 说:
    @SolontoCroesus

    Jews like Italian front-men.

    They do, indeed, S2C. It’s been their MO from the very beginning. Use the Shabbos goy as window dressing at the early stages of their power grab so as not to raise suspicions. Once they are firmly ensconced in the catbird seat, they usually quickly dispose of their front-men.

    洗净,漂洗。 重复。

  470. @Mulegino1

    在您的脑海中,这些都不是真实的,而“犹太人”是另一种形而上学的构造。 以色列 它的存在并不“归功于”童话故事, 以色列 是一个主要由地中海人、阿拉伯人和其他近东人组成的国家的现代名称,除了许多里海人和俄罗斯人,还有一些德国人,还有希腊人和拉丁人。 巴勒斯坦的犹太民族社区一起学会了说希伯来语,并于 1905 年建立了特拉维夫。这个国家以一种或另一种方式诞生了。 1945年,这是一个像南非或澳大利亚一样的历史进程。

    所以,是的,举证责任在于犹太人来证明,

    证明在你心里? 大仙心阁内? 谁是“犹太人”? 控制

    对巴勒斯坦基督徒和穆斯林的剥夺

    你是指自 80 年以来 1920% 的移民? 他们大多是埃及人、阿拉伯人和约旦人,他们参加了近东救济工程处的福利,并以白人的一角钱为每个人生了 9 个婴儿。 他们自己的暴力是造成“剥夺”的原因,这在他们的天性中就像所有城市的“头巾”一样。

    https://israelipalestinian.procon.org/population-statistics/#graph1

    巴勒斯坦是现代史上的丁都纳芬

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_attacks_against_Israeli_civilians_before_1967

    https://www.camera.org/article/anti-jewish-violence-in-pre-state-palestine-1929-massacres/

    • 巨魔: mulga mumblebrain, mark green
  471. Corvinus 说:
    @Truth Vigilante

    “So, because your hero (the serial liar Deborah Lipstadt) disagrees with the evidence, in your mind it’s discredited.”

    Thanks for the strawman. I disagree with the testimony offered by Zundel because it was riddled with half truths and scientific errors.

    “At the end of the day, there is unanimity among objective observers that the evidence that came out…”

    是谁?

    • 回复: @Truth Vigilante
  472. Corvinus 说:
    @John Wear

    I already read this excerpt. You offered a red herring. Where exactly in Barton’s own source does it state he (or others) conducted autopsies?

    Furthermore, why were the Jews put in those camps against their will, with innocent children and the elderly put in harms way? Do you support this treatment? Why?

    • 回复: @John Wear
    , @HdC
  473. @Psychotic Break

    ‘Thank you. They were skeptical and they still are, ever increasingly so. Just like about who really did 9/11; the whole ZOG state, or a handful of loser Arab boys based in a remote cave?’

    两者皆是?

    The loser boys actually did it whilst ZOG looked benignly on?

    A 很多 of times, the truth lies somewhere in the middle. Like, Nazism was one of the more authentic and successful revolutionary movements of modern times — but it went wrong. The Holocaust actually happened — but Jews weren’t precisely immaculately innocent victims. Trump was basically a tacky real estate huckster — who happened to be be preferable to any of the alternatives.

    等等

    • 回复: @Psychotic Break
  474. @John Wear

    ” . . . However, since Dr. Larson’s autopsy reports were inconsistent with a program of extermination or genocide, they were not introduced into evidence at the Nuremberg trials.”

    I’ve read Larson’s biography “Crime Doctor: Dr. Charles P. Larson, World’s Foremost Medical Detective, Reports from His Crime File” by John D. McCallum (1978). His autopsy findings at Dachau–malnutrition, tuberculosis, typhus, and the like–didn’t jibe with the “Holocaust” mantra. . . .

    • 回复: @mulga mumblebrain
  475. Corvinus 说:
    @anon

    实际上,尽管德怀特·D·艾森豪威尔指挥官研究了他的二战敌人,但他对 1945 年 XNUMX 月在奥德鲁夫集中营目睹的纳粹暴行毫无准备。尸体像木头一样堆积,活生生的骷髅挣扎着生存。 即使盟军继续战斗,艾森豪威尔也预见到有一天大屠杀的恐怖可能会被否认。 他邀请媒体记录现场。 他强迫居住在周围城镇的德国人和任何不在前线战斗的士兵亲眼目睹暴行。 

    Anticipating the defeat of Germany in October of 1943, the Allies established a United Nations War Crimes Commission to collect evidence that could be used to prosecute Nazi war criminals. After the surrender of Germany, President Truman appointed Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson as chief counsel to investigate and try Nazi war criminals involved on the Holocaust. From November 1945 until October 1946, the International Military Tribunal, in the former Nazi stronghold of Nuremburg, heard cases against 22 senior, Nazi leaders. The court sentenced twelve to death and three to life sentences. Hundreds of other lesser figures in the Nazi conspiracy (what Truman called “second stringers”) were tried from January 1946 to April 1949. The Office of Military Government found 185 more Nazis guilty of war crimes.

    法医考古学家卡罗琳·斯特迪·科尔斯 (Caroline Sturdy Colls) 写道,对波兰特雷布林卡 (Treblinka) 死亡集中营是否存在万人坑的任何疑虑,都将在使用可以看到地下的工具对该地点进行的首次调查中得到解决。

    从 1939 年到 1948 年,欧洲的犹太人口显着下降,从 9 人减少到 3 万人。

    The Nazi government permitted the ICRC and its delegates to act on behalf of the several millions of prisoners held in the Stalags and Oflags. It refused, however, to allow any intervention on the part of the Red Cross in the concentration camps….In the face of such an obstinate refusal which covered up the horrifying reality, about which one was then ill-informed, the ICRC certainly could have made itself heard; it could have protested publicly and called on the conscience of the world. By doing so it would, however, have deprived itself of any possibility of acting in Hitler’s Empire; it would have deliberately given up what chances there still remained to it to help, even in a restricted manner, the victims of the concentration camp regime. But, above all, it would have made it impossible for it to continue its activity on behalf of millions of military captives. For the Nazi leaders viewed this activity with suspicion which they would have ruthlessly suppressed on the slightest pretext.

  476. Sepp 说:
    @帝国臣民

    这是一个非常讽刺的评论。

    Deepl, my translator of choice, says that 帝国臣民 = “Imperial Subject”. That too is very fitting.

    你写:

    我不仅活到足以见证苏联的终结,我也将活到足以见证美帝国的终结。 你也知道。

    As a one time “Imperial Subject” of the US, I agree with that sentiment, but I am not certain of its content. I foresee a lot of writhing in agony of the US, and the cutting off of its imperial tentacles, but there will still be the rump of that empire, and the empire in the minds of its subjects.

    Since the “US Empire” has been Judaized ever since its inception as an “Empire”, it is really a part of an virtual empire far larger than just what is in the minds of those who still believe in the “American Dream”. That empire is in essence “Judea”.

    At this point Judaism has given way, or morphed, into Holocaustianity, and its non-Jewish followers could be defined as those who believe in the “Holocaust”. I would contend that this is basically what we understand as the “West” as well, but that also includes all of Eastern Europe and Russia too. For Russia, at least under Putin, even has its own laws legally enforcing belief in and the worship of Holocaustianity. From the time of the Tsar’s, all the way through the Judeo-Communist reigns of terror, and into the current Putin-Chabbad Lubowitz run “modern” Russia, this multi-ethnic state is and has been a province of Judea.

    即使美国陷入内战或革命,它也仍将是一个犹太省,大屠杀是其国教或核心信仰体系。

    所以我认为 “see the end of the US empire” 本质上意味着 “see the end of Judea”,我怀疑你会活着看到这一点。 事实上,我不相信中国和日本还不是犹太的一部分,中国和日本还没有受到大屠杀的束缚。

    我将在 WEF 2022 开幕时结束。

    以下是克劳斯·施瓦布宣布开启新的大屠杀世界秩序:

    这是习近平,基本上告诉我们中国是持卡会员:

  477. @Colin Wright

    Not only are you incapable of winning any argument, you appear unable to even make any viable contribution to any question at all.

    You present false and inappropriate dichotomies, only selected aspects of a discussion are presented, and you sow confusion in order to obfuscate such that no path through a data set becomes possible for any kind of realistic revue.

    This is wholly typical of the squalid and fraudulent ‘woke’ agenda which has absolutely nothing to bring to an argument, or anything at all, other than deliberate shit-stirred confusion and parasitic deception.

    • 同意: Carolyn Yeager
    • 巨魔: Colin Wright
    • 回复: @Carolyn Yeager
  478. Fox 说:
    @Sepp

    That non-Jews are in large numbers so willing to act in the Jews’ behalf is a worry for me. We see non-Jews raising the Jewish banner, erecting monuments to their myths, accepting their rituals and ritualistic outbursts, preferring their style, while dismissing the existence of their own people, reducing it to a mere serving role to Jews’ aspirations, disregarding their lives, devaluing their sacrifices and struggles, and accusing rather than defending them. In short, the bond of solidarity and sympathy among non-Jews has frayed and this is dismissed as a fatal threat for the future by an influential and vociferous number of people. The danger is willfully not taken note of, rather it is applauded when yet someone else goes to prison for saying that the 6-million-saga is lacking evidence. Everything is being sacrificed to make this myth the centerpiece of human existence. Everything: that includes life, future, liberty, joyful hope, the principles of science, religious believes, esthetic preferences, friendship, civil behavior, common sense and plain decency.

    • 同意: Sepp, Carolyn Yeager, Robjil
  479. @Ron Unz

    Is it stupidity or corruption that has led US elites to push Russia into China’s arms? Russia is our natural ally against china. The either unforgivably foolish or treasonous foreign policy establishment in America should hang for the damage they’ve done to US-Russian relations.

    • 回复: @littlereddot
    , @Seraphim
    , @Ron Unz
  480. @Orville H. Larson

    Dachau was a concentration camp, NOT an extermination camp.

    • 回复: @Carolyn Yeager
  481. @simple mind

    一看就知道,每次从耶史瓦垃圾堆里爬出来,纯属犹太法西斯种族仇恨的精髓。 可怜可怜的巴勒斯坦人,他们唯一的罪行就是存在并妨碍种族主义精神病患者,而且我们可以从你身上判断,只要你的仇恨达到临界点,他们就会面临灭绝。

  482. @Corvinus

    科瓦努斯写道:

    Thanks for the strawman. I disagree with the testimony offered by Zundel because it was riddled with half truths and scientific errors.

    “At the end of the day, there is unanimity among objective observers that the evidence that came out during the Zundel trial absolutely gutted the conventional Holocaust narrative.”

    是谁?

    In fact, not a single individual of integrity or objective scholar of the Holohoax claimed that Zundel’s defence had any half truths or scientific errors.

    As to the unanimity among unbiased observers, there are scores of them.
    There are the likes of the internationally acclaimed Dr Fredrick Toben, Dr Nicholas Kollerstrom, Mark Weber, David Irving, Jurgen Graf and me of course.

    I’d have to consult with them first to be absolutely certain but I believe that the highly regarded historians John Wear and Thomas Dalton would volunteer themselves to be on that list as well.

    • 回复: @John Wear
    , @Carolyn Yeager
  483. @Corvinus

    Corvanus wrote:

    法医考古学家卡罗琳·斯特迪·科尔斯 (Caroline Sturdy Colls) 写道,对波兰特雷布林卡 (Treblinka) 死亡集中营是否存在万人坑的任何疑虑,都将在使用可以看到地下的工具对该地点进行的首次调查中得到解决。

    Indeed they have been put to rest.

    They found …. NOT A SCINTILLA OF EVIDENCE that even a single individual had been murdered at Treblinka, let alone the asinine claim that hundreds of thousands had been genocided there.

    • 同意: John Wear, HdC
  484. John Wear 说:
    @Corvinus

    Dr. Russell Barton never conducted autopsies at Bergen-Belsen. I never said that he did. The autopsies were performed by Dr. Charles Larsen at Dachau. These autopsies were ruled death by natural causes.

    You write: “Furthermore, why were the Jews put in those camps against their will, with innocent children and the elderly put in harms way? Do you support this treatment? Why?”

    My response: Jews were interned in camps and ghettos during World War II because Jews were generally hostile toward Germany, and many Jewish partisans were actively killing German troops. In addition to ghetto fighters, Jewish civilians fled to the forests and enlisted in partisan units, carrying out sabotage and intelligence missions. Jews had to be interned to protect against these sabotage and intelligence operations.

    I see nothing wrong with this treatment. Many Jewish women used stealth and disguises to murder Germans. For example, 24-year-old Niuta Teitelbaum, from the Communist group Spartacus, wore her flaxen hair in braids, appearing like a young 16-year-old—an innocent disguise that hid her role as an assassin. She walked into the office of a high-ranking Gestapo officer, and shot him in cold blood at his desk. Teitelbaum pulled the trigger on yet another German officer while he was in bed in his own home. In another operation, she killed two Gestapo agents and wounded a third who was taken to a hospital. Disguising herself as a doctor, Teitelbaum entered the wounded Gestapo agent’s room, and murdered both him and his guard.

    In another instance, Teitelbaum dressed like a Polish farm girl with a kerchief in her blond hair. She walked into a German command post, smiled, and then shot an SS soldier with her pistol. Another time, Teitelbaum strolled up to the guards outside Szucha, and said she needed to speak to a certain officer about a “personal matter.” The guards showed her the way to her “boyfriend’s office,” where she pulled out a concealed pistol with a silencer and shot him in the head. She smiled meekly at the guards on her way out.

    For these and other acts of lethal resistance, the Gestapo nicknamed Teitelbaum “Little Wanda with the Braids,” and put her on all of its most-wanted lists. She survived the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising, but was eventually hunted down and executed a few months later. (Source: Batalion, Judy, The Light of Days: The Untold Story of Women Resistance Fighters in Hitler’s Ghettos, New York: Harper Collins Publishers, 2020, pp. 219-220).

    • 谢谢: HdC
    • 回复: @Corvinus
    , @Ann Nonny Mouse
  485. John Wear 说:
    @Corvinus

    After the Allies defeated Germany in 1945, the press in Germany was directly licensed and censured by the victors. Eisenhower or his deputies ran everything inside Germany, so censorship was extremely easy to maintain. The Allies established a client government in which journalists, writers, artists, and academics all supported “the West.” Both the German and Allied press refused to publish anything concerning Allied atrocities, while stories about German atrocities were frequently published.

    For example, Gens. George Patton, Omar Bradley, and Dwight Eisenhower toured the German concentration camp at Ohrdruf on April 12, 1945. They saw more than 3,200 naked, emaciated dead bodies flung into shallow graves, with many more dead bodies lying in the streets where they had fallen. Soon after seeing Ohrdruf, Eisenhower ordered every unit nearby that was not in the front lines to tour the camp. Eisenhower stated: “We are told that the American soldier does not know what he is fighting for. Now, at least, he will know what he is fighting against.”

    艾森豪威尔还致电伦敦和华盛顿,敦促官员和新闻记者代表团成为难民营的目击者。 艾森豪威尔给华盛顿的信息是:“我们一直在寻找德国难民营,他们将政治犯安置在难以置信的条件下。 从我个人的观察来看,我可以明确地说,到目前为止,所有书面陈述都没有掩盖全部恐怖。”

    XNUMX月下旬和XNUMX月初,在被占领的德国,游览解放的集中营成为一种习惯。 美国军官强迫当地公民和德国战俘查看营地。 在德国营地中令人作呕的一堆令人垂涎的尸体面前,德国平民违背了他们的意愿游行。

    一长串官方访客也开始响应艾森豪威尔的号召,要求目击难民营中的恐怖事件。 国会选择了一个两党联合委员会来参观营地的地点,众议员都对营地的条件感到震惊。 除了国会访问之外,艾森豪威尔还安排了一个由杰出的美国记者组成的委员会,对集中营进行了类似的视察。 美国记者都尽职尽责地报道了他们在集中营目睹的恐怖事件。

    约瑟夫·普利策 (Joseph Pulitzer) 是德裔美国人密集的圣路易斯市的德​​裔美国人,他对集中营里的所见所闻非常愤怒,于是发起了一场公共教育运动。 普利策想消除美国的这种信念,即这种关于德国暴行的言论主要是宣传。 普利策的《圣路易斯邮报》与联邦政府合作,举办了由信号兵营地照片制成的真人大小的摄影壁画展览。 照片展与由信号兵团制作的长达一小时的关于营地的电影纪录片相结合。 很快,文明世界中的几乎每个人都看到了德国集中营中可怕条件的照片。

    Dwight Eisenhower could have authorized the same public exposure of the extermination camps for surrendered German POWS he ran in Germany. For obvious reasons he chose not to. The censorship by SHAEF under Eisenhower’s command was stricter than it had been during the actual fighting. The New York Times argued vigorously against this policy in a front page news story on May 27, 1945: “The American people are being deprived of information to which they are entitled…It seems almost as though now that there is no enemy to fight, high Army officers are spending a large part of their time writing directives to circumscribe the movements and activities of war correspondents.”

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  486. @bombthe3gorgesdam

    They say that “In a democracy, the people deserve the government they have”.

    Do you agree with that statement?

    • 回复: @bombthe3gorgesdam
  487. John Wear 说:
    @Truth Vigilante

    I agree with you that the evidence presented at the 1985 and 1988 Ernst Zundel trials “absolutely gutted the conventional Holocaust narrative.” You can add me to your list.

    • 谢谢: Truth Vigilante
  488. @Ron Unz

    I was aiming to show proper appreciation of the subtle humour involved when you toss in your trigger words “elderly” and “foolish” and explain it to readers who are not long time cognoscenti. And I do note that you are inviting me to cho