Unz评论•另类媒体选择$
美国主流媒体大都排除了有趣,重要和有争议的观点
 完整档案凯文·巴雷特(Kevin Barrett)播客
五角大楼会议于9月11日举行的4/XNUMX真相科学家峰会

书签 全部切换总目录添加到图书馆从图书馆中删除 • B
显示评论下一个新评论下一个新回复了解更多
回复同意/不同意/等等 更多... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
同意不同意谢谢LOL轮唱
这些按钮可将您的公开协议,异议,感谢,LOL或巨魔与所选注释一起注册。 仅对最近使用“记住我的信息”复选框保存姓名和电子邮件的频繁评论者可用,并且在任何八个小时的时间内也只能使用三次。
忽略评论者 关注评论者
搜寻文字 区分大小写  确切的词  包括评论
列表 书签


Commercial pilot and former air traffic controller Robin Hordon recently discussed questions about the “hijacked 9/11 airliners” on this show. Continuing that discussion, 大卫·钱德勒 of 9/11真相的科学家 joins us to promote the Conference on the 9/11 Pentagon Evidence he is organizing:

University Park United Methodist Church (East Fellowship Hall) 2180 S University Blvd, Denver, CO 80210
May 4, 2019 / 9:30 am – 5:00 pm

The presenters at the Conference include David Chandler, Wayne Coste, Ken Jenkins, Warren Stutt, and John Wyndham. All five argue in favor of a large plane impact, presumably American Flight 77, at the Pentagon.

According to this interpretation of the evidence, the 9/11 airliners would have almost certainly been guided by remote control, not by human hijackers; all informed commentators agree that Hani Hanjour, the alleged hijacker-pilot of American 77, could not have flown the bizarrely difficult official trajectory into the Pentagon.

For a summary of the Conference presenters’ argument, watch David Chandler’s 20-part narrated presentation of Wayne Coste’s “Explanation of the Evidence at the Pentagon on 9/11.”

For a very different perspective, listen to Barbara Honegger 在我的广播节目中, and read her Toronto Hearings paper “Eyewitnesses for and Evidence of Explosives at the Pentagon.=

(从重新发布 真相圣战 经作者或代表的许可)
 
• 类别: 对外政策 •标签: 9/11 
当前评论者
说:

发表评论-对超过两周的文章发表评论,将在质量和语气上进行更严格的判断


 记得 我的信息为什么?
 电子邮件回复我的评论
$
提交的评论已被许可给 Unz评论 并可以由后者自行决定在其他地方重新发布
在翻译模式下禁用评论
通过RSS订阅此评论主题 通过RSS订阅所有Kevin Barrett评论