Unz评论•另类媒体选择$
美国主流媒体大都排除了有趣,重要和有争议的观点
 博客浏览E.迈克尔·琼斯档案
HBO的“反对美国的阴谋”
通过电子邮件将此页面发送给其他人

 记住我的信息



=>

书签 全部切换总目录添加到图书馆从图书馆中删除 • B
显示评论下一个新评论下一个新回复了解更多
回复同意/不同意/等等 更多... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
同意不同意谢谢LOL轮唱
这些按钮可将您的公开协议,异议,感谢,LOL或巨魔与所选注释一起注册。 仅对最近使用“记住我的信息”复选框保存姓名和电子邮件的频繁评论者可用,并且在任何八个小时的时间内也只能使用三次。
忽略评论者 关注评论者
搜寻文字 区分大小写  确切的词  包括评论
列表 书签

“恐惧”是 对美国的阴谋, 菲利普·罗斯(Philip Roth)小说刚刚被HBO系列电视台重新利用,该电视台由The Corner,The Wire和Generation Kill的创建者David Simon和Ed Burns进行了再利用。 罗斯对我们说:“恐惧掌管着这些记忆,是一种永恒的恐惧。” 所涉及的记忆是罗斯(Roth),他在新泽西州纽瓦克(Newark)的一个犹太家庭中长大。 恐惧来自历史的一次改变,这种改变将这些记忆变成了罗斯在接受NPR的罗伯特·西格尔(Robert Siegel)采访时所说的“一种虚假的回忆录”。 小说的前提是,查尔斯·林德伯格在1940年其他的一切在本书从下面的前提和罗斯的种族偏执狂和他的种族偏见当选总统。 罗斯的书最重要的是事实,那就是小说。 对美国的阴谋 是一个犹太人的幻想,首先是因为它告诉我们有关罗斯的个人信息,但也因为它告诉了我们有关种族群体的信息,该种族群体接受了他偏执的犹太幻想,这是除精神科医生和精神病医生以外的其他人所重视的事情,因此这是一个有趣的事情。文化病理学家。

立即订购

举一个充满这种恐惧的早期例子,七岁的菲利普(Philip)七岁的菲利普在新泽西联合州(Union,New Jersey)的旅途中看到一个德国啤酒花园,他的父亲正在考虑搬家,以利用这个家庭的利益。在他受雇的保险公司晋升。 接下来是这位71岁的老人的偏执投射到他XNUMX岁的名酒中。 普通美国人可能会认为“小镇中间一英亩的露天欢乐氛围”实际上是一种“被称为啤酒花园”的东西。 在您不知不觉中,按照以下逻辑,啤酒园就变成了奥斯威辛的美国同等物:“啤酒园与德意志美式外滩有关,德意志美式外滩与希特勒有关,而希特勒我没有被告知,与迫害犹太人有一切关系。” 啤酒园是美国人喝“反犹太主义的麻醉剂”的地方。 这就是我想到的,那天他们都在他们的啤酒花园中如此小心地喝酒-像世界各地的所有纳粹分子一样,一品脱反犹太主义而一品脱,仿佛正在吸收普遍疗法。” 所有这一切都通过一个据称是七岁的孩子开车时经过的脑海。

罗斯的书在某种程度上表明了反犹太主义是普遍的补救办法,但并不是罗斯所指出的那样。 反犹太主义的指控已成为不受欢迎话语的普遍补救办法。 它们还是20年代准确历史的普遍补救措施th 世纪。 作为美国进入第二次世界大战前夕反犹主义在美国肆虐的证据(以及不受欢迎的言论被沉默),罗斯在美国第一集会上引用了查尔斯·林德伯格(Charles Lindbergh)的《得梅因》广播讲话。 实际上,他在整本书的附录中做了整个演讲。 至少从罗斯想要实现的观点来看,这是一个错误,因为它与罗斯想要林德伯格所说的相反。 在演讲中,我们阅读了林德伯格的声明; “任何有人类尊严感的人都不能宽恕德国犹太人种族的迫害,”这听起来不像是反犹太主义者的狂欢。 林德伯格的观点是,当时罗斯福政府,英国人和犹太人这三个团体正试图将美国带入战争,而犹太人“将是第一个感受到后果的人”,因为“宽容无法在战争和战争中生存”。毁灭。” 这是美国公共生活中最后一次有人把犹太人列为批评团体。 罗斯福政府参战后,林德伯格和《美国第一》(America First)陷入沉寂,此后一直被妖魔化。 罗斯的书是对这种妖魔化的又一贡献。

但是,如果林德伯格(Lindbergh)在谈论欧洲,那么他以一种当时没人能理解的方式是完全正确的。 战争为歼灭欧洲大批犹太人提供了掩护。 如果林德伯格(Lindbergh)是在谈论美国,那他就错了,因为-步伐罗斯先生-美国没有大屠杀。 菲利普·罗斯(Philip Roth)在谈论哪个林德伯格(Lindbergh)? 他在脑海中谈论的是林德伯格(Lindbergh),这是一种虚构的道具,被用来证明罗斯对仇恨的仇恨是正当的。 goyim 而且他对美国的怀有极大的矛盾心,甚至超越了文艺复兴时期的波兰 天堂 犹太人。 在罗斯的父母之间的争论中,矛盾情绪表现得最好。 罗斯的父亲对林德伯格(Lindbergh)总统的节目大为恼火,大喊“这是我们的国家”,罗斯的母亲则说:“不再。 是林德伯格的。 这是 戈伊姆斯'。 这是他们的国家。” 换句话说,这本书围绕着不健康的二分法(这是我们的国家/是他们的祖国)展开,而对二分法为何不健康的原因却一无所知。 罗斯的书正是他所说的。 这是“虚假的回忆录”。 出于政治和种族目的,这是对历史的歪曲。 这也是一种偏执和诽谤的运动。 任何事情都是有道理的,因为罗斯认为他的敌人是邪恶的化身,完全值得他对邪恶施加仇恨。 罗斯不再像以前那样促进性解放 波特诺伊的投诉,但即使那种扭曲的幽默消失了,仇恨和偏执仍然存在。

罗斯的书是“虚假回忆录”,是真实情况的镜像。 如果说有法西斯主义美国这样的东西,那是罗斯的英雄富兰克林·德拉诺·罗斯福(Franklin Delano Roosevelt)创造的。 如果美国曾经有过“用专政统治的绝对权威取代美国民主的阴谋”,罗斯福就将其揭幕,而继任他的总统只是简单地执行了他的就职演说。

第一个在罗斯家族中引起愤慨的计划是林德伯格的“正义民俗计划”,该计划将犹太儿童送往肯塔基州等地方-罗斯在美国的两个邪恶中心之一(另一个是底特律),菲利普的兄弟在那里工作。丹维尔附近的一个烟草农场。 罗斯告诉我们:“这种所谓的正义民俗的唯一目的是使犹太儿童成为第五专栏,并使他们背叛父母。”

好吧,这听起来像是对这种政府计划背后目的的合理解释。 但是,是谁在1930年代提出了这样的建议呢? 答案几乎是当时每个当权者。 纳粹分子 希特勒·尤金德,但罗斯所说的是斯大林的 康索莫尔 他在做同样的事情,也没有提到“正义人士”与罗斯福公立的自然保护团的怪异事实。 根据罗斯的幻想,犹太人“被强迫与我们过去的美国人不同。” 林德伯格下令将犹太人“从家人和朋友那里运送数千英里。” 。 。 。 犹太人将散布到任何地方,无论希特尔美国原住民组织如何繁荣发展。”

路易斯·沃思与种族清洗

如果这听起来有点耳熟,那是因为这种事情确实发生在美国,大约在罗斯的小说发生的同时,但它是由罗斯福政府而不是某个虚构的林德伯格完成的,而且因为它是针对其他种族的团体,而不是犹太人。 反对美国的阴谋 是犹太版的 透过窥镜; 一切都差不多,但在政治上颠倒了。 美国政府从未围捕犹太人,但它确实围捕了西海岸的日裔美国人。 罗斯福笔下的英雄罗斯福与罗斯福笔下的英雄斯大林一样,在小说发生时也进行了积极的种族清洗。 美国种族清洗的伟大理论家是路易斯·沃斯 (Louis Wirth),他是一名犹太人,同时也是芝加哥大学的社会学家,他崇拜斯大林,认为斯大林是根据最高道德原则解决苏联民族问题的。 乌克兰的种族灭绝是由另一名犹太人拉扎尔·卡冈诺维奇 (Lazar Kaganovich) 指挥的,他也曾为斯大林掌管古拉格群岛,很久以前,这位有价值的人已经将像托洛茨基这样不那么屈从的犹太人从共产党中清除了。 所以从犹太版翻译过来 透过窥镜 回到现实,罗斯指责美国优先派对犹太人犯下的罪行,正如斯大林和罗斯福的犹太特工实际上对其他族裔群体犯下的罪行,尤其是美国的日本人和天主教民族,以及乌克兰人、伏尔加德意志人、卡尔梅克人,以及苏联的许多其他人。 心理学家称之为投射,它通常与内疚有关,但稍后会详细介绍。

林德伯格总统试图“建立'美国法西斯新秩序',一种以希特勒为模型的极权独裁统治”的下一步被称为“好邻居计划”,这是一项政府计划,“旨在引入越来越多的非犹太人居民进入以犹太人为主的社区,并以这种方式‘丰富’参与其中的每个人的‘美国性’。” 作为一个超越年龄的聪明男孩,七岁的菲利普明白好邻居计划的“潜在目标”“是削弱犹太社会结构的团结,并削弱犹太社区可能拥有的任何选举力量。在地方和国会选举中。” 为了在当时罗斯家族居住的纽瓦克实现这一目标,“公寓于 XNUMX 月腾空。 . . 被第一区以上的意大利家庭占领。 基本上,他们的新住所是由政府直接下令分配给他们的。 到林德伯格下一次竞选总统时,“早在林德伯格第二个任期开始之时,以及美国犹太人问题即将解决之时,基督徒多数很可能会在美国人口最稠密的 XNUMX 个犹太社区中至少占一半,通过一种或另一种方式。”

如果这一切听起来有点耳熟,那是因为它确实发生在美国,但没有发生在林德伯格的统治下,也没有发生在犹太人身上。 正如我在 城市的屠杀:作为种族清洗的城市更新,战争信息办公室在路易斯沃斯和阿奇博尔德麦克利什等人的指导下,发起了一场运动,将黑人佃农从南方转移到政府资助的住房项目中,这些项目故意建在天主教民族社区,“以削弱人民的团结[天主教] 社会结构,以及削弱 [天主教] 社区在地方和国会选举中可能拥有的任何选举力量。”

换句话说,用辛克莱刘易斯小说的标题来解释作为罗斯的模型,它可能发生在这里。 事实上,它确实发生在这里,但在某种程度上是罗斯小说中故事的镜像。 从来没有人在美国挑出犹太人进行种族清洗,但犹太人路易斯沃斯正在策划破坏天主教社区,正是罗斯在他的好邻居计划中提到的方法。 面对邻里种族清洗的前景,年轻的菲利普·罗斯发誓:“没有什么能让我离开这里。 . . . 不会被美国政府赶出一条街道,这条街道的排水沟里涌出长生不老药。” 当然,菲利普和他的家人被他书中的英雄们赶出了他们在纽瓦克的家——这个国家仍然有好人。 有罗斯福,有伊克斯,还有拉瓜迪亚市长。” 但他们并没有因为他们是犹太人而被政府精心策划的黑人移民赶出家园。 他们被赶出纽瓦克,因为他们仍然是模糊的种族,即使他们支持反法西斯战争,他们被赶到罗斯描述的郊区 再见,哥伦布 使它们“变白”。 对此,罗斯 佩雷 比罗斯更有先见之明 儿子 当他说:“这就是为一家大公司工作的感觉。 大公司一直在调动人员。” 这就是威廉 H.怀特的观点 组织人,而且是怀特谈到郊区是未同化种族美国化的推动者。

好战者

所以罗斯可以批评那种摧毁了他童年社区的社会工程,但他不能让自己批评那些精心策划的人。 这会干扰他的政治和种族议程,这取决于他妖魔化他的敌人和祝福他的朋友的愿望。 它会干扰他的仇恨,也就是他创造力的源泉。 所以他决定责怪受害者。 罗斯将所有社会工程、种族清洗和社会破坏都归咎于反对美国加入第二次世界大战的人,而战争被用来为其辩护。 因此,当一名联邦调查局特工前来审问七岁的菲利普时,他告诉我们他:

更不用说亨利福特、美国优先、南方民主党或孤立主义共和党人了,更不用说林德伯格了。 过去几年,我在国内听到的仇视犹太人的名人名单远不止这些,还有普通美国人,数以万计,也许数以百万计,就像我们不喜欢喝啤酒的人一样。不想住在Union旁边

像许多犹太人一样,罗斯赞同这样一种教条,即反犹太主义是一种病态,其根源是基督教,因此与基督教密不可分。 因此,反犹太主义与犹太人的行为无关。 犹太人被无缘无故地憎恨。 结果,反犹太主义由于其非常非理性,可以在任何时间任何地点爆发,甚至在美国,正如拉比丹尼尔拉平所说,犹太人从未厌倦过,从未有过更好的生活。

如果我们从 Roth 的版本开始 透过窥镜 结合历史现实,我们发现欧美对犹太人的仇视是有相当明确的历史原因的。 林德伯格,引用罗斯的主要恶棍,认为犹太人是“对这个国家的危险”,因为 1)他们正在推动它走向战争,2)因为“对我们的电影、媒体、广播的巨大所有权和影响和我们的政府。” 11 年 1941 月 XNUMX 日,林德伯格在爱荷华州得梅因举行的美国优先集会上发表讲话时,并没有特别指出犹太人。 相反,他将他们与英国和罗斯福政府列为决心让该国与德国开战的三个团体之一。 林德伯格接着说,

我不是在攻击犹太人或英国人。 我欣赏的两个种族。 但我是说,英国和犹太种族的领导人,出于他们认为可以理解的原因和我们不建议他们的原因,出于非美国的原因,他们希望让我们卷入战争。

和林德伯格一样,罗斯的另一个恶棍亨利福特也有他的理由。 福特将犹太人描述为世界布尔什维克,他们对将革命传播到德国负有主要责任。 他还认为他们对俄罗斯的革命负有责任。 像林德伯格和福特一样,密歇根州皇家橡树的查尔斯·考夫林神父也有他的理由,但他们再次没有被罗斯列举。

在其中一次更奇异的幻想飞行中 情节,角色刺客和八卦专栏作家沃尔特温切尔在被林德伯格的部队驱逐后竞选总统。 可以预见的是,这让反犹主义者陷入了愤怒的爆发,尤其是当他出现在天主教堂区时:“温切尔开始引起愤怒的暴徒高呼‘凯克,回家!’ 在他向信徒展示他的耻辱的每一个教区中,“罗斯是这样说的。 同样可以预见的是,温切尔对罗斯来说“已经成为一个彻头彻尾的神,而且比阿多诺伊更重要”,他将发动“最严重和最广泛的暴力”。 . . 在底特律”,因为底特律是““广播神父”考夫林神父和他憎恨犹太人的基督教阵线的中西部总部。 仅作为记录,基督教阵线由布鲁克林的布罗菲神父领导,但在撰写“虚假回忆录”时,此类事实并不重要。

关于无线电牧师的其他事实同样不重要。 罗斯将考夫林与三K党联系起来,事实上,在三K党在他位于皇家橡树的教​​堂的草坪上烧毁了一个十字架后,无线电牧师开始了他的神殿。 据罗斯称,据称考夫林煽动的骚乱“始于温切尔在哈姆特拉克(Hamtramck)的第一站(该住宅区主要由汽车工人及其家人居住,据说这里是华沙以外世界上最大的波兰人口)。” Hamtramck 离国王圣路易斯教区不远,也是波兰天主教民族的家园,他们成为政府资助的黑人移民的受益者,以淡化社区的种族特征——拉罗斯的“好邻居项目”——以及当波兰人拒绝跟随时,作为联邦军队。 来自 Hamtramck,根据 Roth 在 情节之后,骚乱蔓延到“该市最大的犹太社区,商店被洗劫一空,寡妇被破坏,被困在户外的犹太人遭到殴打,芝加哥大道沿线豪宅的草坪上点燃了沾满煤油的十字架。” 换句话说,它是美国版的 水晶之夜——当然,这在美国从未发生过,尽管 1943 年底特律是美国历史上最致命的种族骚乱现场。

当谈到小说时,读者应该“心甘情愿地停止怀疑”,但在罗斯小说的这一点和其他地方,读者反感——也许是因为他认识到罗斯无意在小说中说出任何真相。他的小说,除非他被迫不顾自己地说出真相——在被以下段落操纵之后:

到夜幕降临时,该市 30,000 名犹太人中的数百名逃离并越过底特律河在安大略省温莎避难,美国历史上记录了第一次大规模屠杀,一场明显模仿了针对德国犹太人的“自发示威”,被称为 水晶之夜 . . . 考夫林神父在他的每周小报中 社会正义,当时作为德国人对“犹太启发的共产主义”的反应进行辩护。

首先,考夫林神父没有辩护 水晶之夜. 他为它是什么而感到遗憾。 我们之所以知道这一点,是因为他于 20 年 1938 月 20 日专门为此做了一个名为“迫害:犹太人和基督徒”的广播节目。 考夫林对针对无辜者的暴力行为表示遗憾,但他这样做的方式是犹太人多年来一直在制定的。 “托洛茨基制造了革命,”一位拉比说,“但布朗斯坦是为此买单的人。” 可见的犹太人为犹太布尔什维克的过激行为付出了代价,他们改变了自己的名字并参与了导致 30 年代和 1919 年代反犹太主义急剧上升的行为。 在他的普通人认可的演讲中,考夫林神父呼吁他的电台听众“反对一切迫害,无论它来自何方”。 与将历史视为煽动种族偏见的借口的罗斯不同,考夫林首先谴责暴力,然后试图解释为什么会发生。 这意味着处理其历史背景; 反过来,这意味着与布尔什维克主义打交道,而这又意味着与犹太人打交道。 考夫林认为,希特勒的崛起以及随之而来的纳粹党在德国上台与共产主义威胁直接相关,自 XNUMX 年两大帝国崩溃以来,共产主义威胁一直在东欧和德国肆虐。

在这方面,他并不孤单。 Ruth Fischer 声称,如果没有布尔什维克革命,慕尼黑永远不会成为纳粹主义的发源地,布尔什维克革命在 20 年代初在那里建立了巴伐利亚苏维埃共和国。 Eugenio Pacelli(后来的教皇庇护十二世)当时作为德国大使住在那里。 在参观了位于维特尔斯巴赫宫的库尔特艾斯纳政府总部后,他报告说他在那里遇到了一群女人,她们的首领是“莱文的情人,一个年轻的俄罗斯人,一个犹太人,离婚了”(l'amante di Levien: una giovarte russa, ebrea, divorziata),正是慕尼黑苏维埃共和国的可悲暴行“激怒了人民并导致反犹太主义急剧增加”。 和以前在俄罗斯一样,所有犹太人都被归咎于少数革命者的过激行为。 布朗斯坦一家为托洛茨基付出了代价。

战后的奥地利也是如此。 在他的书中 关于奥地利的真相吉多·泽纳托斯声称,“现代奥地利反犹主义最重要的基础是犹太知识分子在社会民主党领导层中所扮演的角色。”

马克思主义是一种思想姿态

不像罗斯那样操纵历史事件 水晶之夜 为了政治效果,考夫林试图解释为什么会发生,这包括看到 水晶之夜 以及希特勒在其历史背景下的崛起,作为对布尔什维克主义的过度反应的反应,这是一场被视为典型的犹太人的革命运动。 在 20 月 1933 日的演讲中,考夫林直接向犹太人讲话,要求他们“不要纵容那些在共产主义土地上宣扬迫害事业的无宗教信仰、无神论的犹太人和外邦人; 那些在美国推动无神论事业的人。” 现在是谴责双方过分行为的时候了。 外邦人必须拒绝纳粹主义的过激行为。 但是犹太人和外邦人必须否认纳粹主义起源于共产主义的存在。” 通过将犹太人和布尔什维主义联系起来,考夫林激怒了一群人,正如罗斯的书所证明的那样,直到今天,这些人仍在继续诽谤他是仇视犹太人和同情纳粹的人。 但他当时不得不说的话经常被那些通常不会与反犹太主义联系在一起的人提到,即犹太人自己。 1939 年至 XNUMX 年间运作的纳粹抵抗组织“Rote Kapelle”的领导人利奥波德·特雷珀 (Leopold Trepper) 最简洁地解释说:“我成为共产主义者,因为我是犹太人。” (“Ich wurde Kommunist, weil ich Jude bin。“)

引自约翰内斯·罗加拉·冯·比伯斯坦 (Johannes Rogalla von Bieberstein) 的书“犹太教的布尔什维克主义神话与现实 (SC H Nellroda:安泰奥斯版,2004 年)。 冯·比伯斯坦 (Von Bieberstein) 的书与罗斯 (Roth) 的书同年出版,但您不会在 Borders 或 Barnes and Noble 找到它,菲利普·罗斯 (Philip Roth) 的书在那里如此显眼地展示。 事实上,除非你读德语,否则你将无法阅读所有内容,因为就像亚历山大·索尔仁尼琴(Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn)关于俄罗斯犹太人的历史一样, 一起两百年,它没有被翻译成英文。 冯·比伯斯坦 (Von Bieberstein) 的书是罗斯 (Roth) 的“虚假回忆录”的对立面。 罗斯迎合种族偏见; 冯·比伯斯坦 (von Bieberstein) 整理事实并诉诸理性。 因此,他写了一段有据可查的历史记录,表明 1) 布尔什维克主义是一种犹太现象,2) 它引发了反犹太主义浪潮,使希特勒在德国上台。 与根据犹太小说撰写历史的丹尼尔·戈德哈根(Daniel Goldhagen)以及根据虚构历史撰写犹太小说的菲利普·罗斯(Philip Roth)不同,冯·比伯斯坦(von Bieberstein)撰写了围绕一个主题的神话和现实的描述,该主题在罗斯和戈德哈根是 表面上 反犹太主义的证据。 戈德哈根和罗斯都认同犹太意识形态最基本的信条,即反犹太主义与犹太人的行为无关。 这个前提将所有历史变成了一种政治神秘化的形式。 冯·比伯斯坦 (Von Bieberstein) 详尽地记录了犹太布尔什维克主义在希特勒崛起中所起的作用,从而揭开了神秘化的神秘面纱。 根据冯·比伯斯坦 (von Bieberstein) 的说法,考夫林神父批评纳粹主义,但仍将其视为“一种对抗共产主义的防御机制”。 在这方面,他与亨利福特几乎没有什么不同,后者害怕犹太人主要是因为他认为他们是在全世界传播革命的主导力量。

这个事实通过罗斯的窥镜进入 情节 以下面的方式:

作为一个反共而不是亲纳粹的组织,崩得和以前一样反犹太主义,公开将布尔什维克主义与犹太教等同于宣传讲义。 . . 坚持他们在 1936 年首次组织的官方声明中阐明的目的:“对抗莫斯科主导的红色世界威胁及其犹太杆菌携带者的疯狂”。 . . . 宣传“唤醒美国——粉碎犹太共产党人!”的横幅已经一去不复返了。

罗斯以这种方式陈述他的演员阵容,给人的印象是,任何将犹太人和共产主义联系起来的人都是狂热的纳粹反犹主义者,但事实并非如此。 福特,即使粗略阅读冯·比伯斯坦 (von Bieberstein) 的书也能清楚地表明,认为犹太人在布尔什维克主义中发挥主导作用的并不孤单。 1919 年 XNUMX 月,伍德罗·威尔逊——他不是孤立主义者!——宣布布尔什维克运动是由犹太人领导的。” 大约在同一时间,在一篇文章中 伦敦新闻画报温斯顿·丘吉尔(Winston Churchill),就是将 Intrepid 派到美国参与二战的那个人,因此大概是菲利普·罗斯(Philip Roth)的英雄之一,他也说了同样的话。 1919 年,与亚瑟·科斯特勒一样既是犹太复国主义者又是共产主义者的阿诺德·茨威格写道,“从摩西到林道尔”,“犹太血统”催生了社会主义。 在他的 代表作,Das Prinzip Hoffnung, 犹太人恩斯特·布洛赫 (Ernst Bloch) 在模仿罗马谚语“Ubi Petrus, Ibi Ecclesia”、“Ubi Lenin, Ibi Jerusalem”时,以更简洁的形式说了同样的话。 Elie Wiesel 写道:“我们必须进行革命,因为上帝告诉我们要这样做。 上帝希望我们成为共产主义者。” 1848 年,阿道夫·耶利内克 (Adolf Jellinek) 写道,“反动派谴责犹太人是革命的永恒动力。” 在他的书中, 总督68 年革命的领导人之一丹尼尔·科恩-本迪特 (Daniel Cohn-Bendit) 称托洛茨基“体现了塔木德犹太人的精髓”。 1934年,在他的书中, 天主教和犹太教, 匈牙利耶稣会士贝拉·班哈 (Bela Bangha) 写道,“革命马克思主义”“在本质上对应于犹太人灵魂的一种特殊形式和他的思想姿态”。 14 年 1918 月 XNUMX 日, 美国文学文摘 问了一个问题,“布尔什维基主要是犹太人吗?” 两年后,即 19 年 1920 月 XNUMX 日,以“犹太人的危险”为标题, 基督教科学箴言报 提到了新发现的、随后被抹黑的所谓的全球犹太人阴谋, 锡安长老的礼节. 就在同一天, “芝加哥论坛报” 将布尔什维克主义称为“犹太人控制世界的工具”。

犹太人不比犹太人更倾向于用这种方式说话 goyim. 1921 年,A. Sachs 写道:“犹太布尔什维克主义已经向全世界证明,犹太种族并没有堕落。” 1990年在他的书中 斯大林的 对犹太人的战争路易斯·拉波波特写道,“犹太血统的人”为“共产主义和社会主义奠定了基础”。 Franz Werfel,写小说的人 伯纳黛特之歌1919 年参加了维也纳共产主义起义,他写了一篇题为“以色列给人类的礼物”的文章,他在文章中称“摩西·赫斯、卡尔·马克思和费迪南德·拉萨尔”是“社会主义的教会之父”。 雅各布·图里 (Jacob Toury) 声称,社会主义起源于被连根拔起的替代宗教的传统犹太教。 在一篇题为“犹太革命者”的文章中,该文章出现在 Neue Juedischen Montsheften 1919年底,作者说:“无论反犹一方如何夸大问题,无论犹太资产阶级如何急切否认,犹太人大量参与当代革命运动是一个简单的事实。 。” 一年后,来自布拉格的著名德语犹太人弗朗茨·卡夫卡写道:“你们不能原谅犹太社会主义者和共产主义者。 你把它们淹死在汤里,烤的时候把它们切碎。” (“Den juedischen Sozialisten und Kommunisten verzeiht man nichts, die ertraenkt man in der Suppe und zerschneidet man beim Braten。“)

波兰诺贝尔奖获得者艾萨克·B·辛格(Isaac B. Singer)说波兰语很困难,并因用意第绪语写作而获得诺贝尔文学奖,他声称“华沙的共产党人几乎完全是犹太人,他们给各方带来了火和剑。 他们还声称(在十月革命之后)社会正义只能在俄罗斯找到。” 联邦议院主席弗里德里希·艾伯特声称犹太人是德国革命的罪魁祸首,“实际上每个犹太人都是加密布尔什维克。” 1904 年,德国犹太复国主义者弗朗茨·奥本海默 (Franz Oppenheimer) 评论道:“没有什么比东欧的当代犹太人是天生的革命家更确定的了。” 随之而来的几乎是普遍承认犹太人参与布尔什维克主义的是前所未有的反犹太主义浪潮。 使像图勒这样的种族主义组织成为危险威胁的正是这种普遍共识,即“没有犹太人就没有布尔什维克主义”。

正如埃里希·哈伯勒 (Erich Haberer) 所言,犹太人一直是俄罗斯革命运动的中坚力量。 第一次世界大战战败后,中央力量之间的社会混乱使革命运动取得了最大的成功。 犹太人现在可以向一直迫害他们的传统基督教君主国报仇。 根据迈克尔勒纳的说法,犹太人“是传统社区崩溃的热心代表,因为这些社区歧视犹太人。” 斯坦利·罗斯曼 (Stanley Rothman) 和 S. 罗伯特·利希特 (S. Robert Lichter) 坚持认为,“犹太激进分子的目标是将基督徒与他们的社会疏远,就像犹太人已与这些文化疏远一样。” 1849 年,在 以色列的赫罗德, Karl Ludwig Bernays 解释说:“犹太人以一种全新的方式对充满敌意的世界进行了报复。 . . 通过将人类从各种宗教和任何爱国情绪中解放出来。” 在 30 年 1917 月 XNUMX 日发行的 犹太纪事,托洛茨基被描述为“为沙皇统治下的犹太人苦难和屈辱的复仇者”。

冯·比伯斯坦 (Von Bieberstein) 对第一次世界大战前后时期革命运动的当代文献的调查表明,犹太人的参与与犹太人对弥赛亚政治的吸引力有关。 嫁给瓦格纳家族并成为希特勒支持者的英国种族理论家休斯顿·斯图尔特·张伯伦 (Houston Stewart Chamberlain) 指责“犹太无神论者”“计划了一个不可能实现的社会主义和经济弥赛亚王国,而没有考虑到在这样做的过程中他们会导致我们如此辛苦建立的文明和文化的毁灭。” 恩斯特·布洛赫 (Ernst Bloch) 在 1918 年将自己描述为“具有种族意识的犹太人”,他将革命马克思主义者的普罗米修斯计划描述为“第二次化身”。 以类似的方式,后来更名为 Mose Y. BenGavriel 的维也纳文学评论家 Eugen Hoeflich 写道:“布尔什维克犹太人想要点燃欧洲,不是为了填饱他的腰包,而是因为他被最纯粹的想法,一种表现出错误的想法,这种错误会导致悲惨的后果,这是由战争引起的大规模精神病产生的。”

1917 年的俄国革命已经够糟糕了,但它对公众舆论的心理影响远不及它的女儿革命——短暂的巴伐利亚和匈牙利苏维埃共和国——对东欧人民的心理影响。 贝拉·昆为匈牙利的犹太人所做的,就像库尔特·艾斯纳为德国的犹太人所做的一样; 两人在各自国家掀起了巨大的反犹太主义浪潮。 “犹太人”成为“革命”的同义词,很快新的标签如“乌姆斯图兹尤登,” “革命青年,“ 也 ”革命”开始巡视。 由贝拉·昆 (Bela Kun) 领导,他在 20 世纪初将其父亲的名字改为科恩 (Kohn)th 世纪以来,匈牙利苏维埃共和国在当地的匈牙利人中散布恐惧和厌恶,他们谴责它是“犹太共和国。” 根据 Lichter 和 Rothman 的书 激进主义的根源, 匈牙利苏维埃共和国的 30 位政委中有 48 位是犹太人。 在 202 名高级官员中,161 名是犹太人。 这一事实和其他事实导致 伦敦时报 在 1919 年将昆政权描述为“犹太黑手党”。 根据纳撒尼尔·卡茨堡的说法,“匈牙利的布尔什维克主义”“主要是一个犹太企业”。 因此,布达佩斯的苏维埃共和国被谴责为“犹太人的统治”和“犹太人的统治”也就不足为奇了。犹太共和国。” 当苏维埃共和国倒台时,一波大屠杀席卷匈牙利也就不足为奇了。 布朗斯坦一家又一次不得不为托洛茨基的过激行为付出代价。

奥地利也是如此,剧作家亚瑟·施尼茨勒在他的日记中将革命者描述为“文学犹太人、掠夺暴徒和白痴的混合体”。 匈牙利的革命成为世界各地的头条新闻。 最终结果是反犹太主义抬头,而不仅仅是在匈牙利。 鲁道夫·布拉汉姆在他关于匈牙利大屠杀的书中声称,推动世界革命的“智利激情”无情地导致了反革命,而短暂而残酷的共产主义政权留下了对匈牙利犹太人造成毁灭性后果的痛苦遗产。

在第一次世界大战之前和之后的时期,天主教会,特别是耶稣会士是革命运动的主要反对者。因此,天主教徒是突出的——至少在这个时间点——指出大量犹太人参与革命运动。 在 21 年 1922 月 XNUMX 日的梵蒂冈官方期刊上发表的一篇文章中 卡托利卡文明 题为“幸福的梦,”(世界革命和犹太人),共产主义被描述为“来自“犹太种族”的“闪族幻想的变态”。 在他 1926 年的书中 犹太法庭和基督教会, SJ Erich Pryzwara 神父引用马丁·布伯 (Martin Buber) 和其他犹太思想家的名言,将社会主义追溯到其根源于犹太弥赛亚主义,迫使他得出一个悲哀的结论,即犹太人“被一个人驱使成为基督教世界不知疲倦的革命者”。内心的需要。” 归根结底,犹太人“被他最深刻的宗教信仰驱使他不懈地积极行动。 他确实是不安分的Ahasver。”

以类似的方式,波兰主教将第一次世界大战后在东欧释放的布尔什维克愤怒追溯到犹太人一直对基督教世界的“传统仇恨”。 在 1920 年波兰与新生的苏联的战争期间,波兰主教发表了一封牧函,他们在信中宣布:

真正的目标或布尔什维克主义是征服世界。 掌握布尔什维克领导权的种族。 . . 一心要征服万国。 . . 尤其是,因为布尔什维克的领袖们的血液里流淌着对基督教世界的传统仇恨。 布尔什维克主义实际上是敌基督在地球上的化身和化身。

与德国和匈牙利的共产党一样,波兰的共产党绝大多数是犹太人。 华沙 1920% 的共产党人是犹太人。 在 XNUMX 年代,这一比例甚至更高,这再次助长了反犹太主义。

由于德国主教分享了他们波兰教友的观点,他们陷入了同样的世界末日情绪。 纳粹主义最著名的主教反对者、明斯特主教克莱门斯·格拉夫·冯·盖伦 (Clemens Graf von Galen) 写了一封牧函,为希特勒入侵苏联辩护,因为这将使世界摆脱“布尔什维克主义的瘟疫”。

犹太人对弥赛亚政治的倾向解释了整个 20 世纪革命运动中犹太人人数过多的原因th 世纪。 一旦波兰在凡尔赛条约之后建国,苏联的犹太人口就下降到了总人口的 11% 左右,这反过来又使犹太人在俄罗斯革命政党中的人数过多。 在这方面,拥有 14% 犹太人的布尔什维克是所有革命政党中犹太人最少的,尽管犹太人的比例过高是俄罗斯犹太人口的五倍。 相比之下,社会革命党是 23% 的犹太人,孟什维克党是 XNUMX% 的犹太人,其代表比例是俄罗斯犹太人口比例的十倍。

如果我们转向革命运动的领导层,犹太人的过度代表更加引人注目。 21 年 1917 月,俄国共产党中央委员会的 28.6 名成员中,有 17 名,即 50%,是犹太人。 孟什维克的百分比甚至更高,中央委员会 1918 名成员中有 XNUMX 名,即大约 XNUMX%,是犹太人。 在文化委员 Anatoli Lunatcharsky 编制的布尔什维克领导层七位主要成员名单中,七位顶级布尔什维克——托洛茨基、斯维尔德洛夫、辛诺维耶夫和卡马涅夫——中有四位是犹太人。 当奥地利外交部长奥托卡尔·格拉夫·切尔宁 (Ottokar Graf Czernin) 写到 XNUMX 年初在布列斯特-立托夫斯克举行的和平谈判时,他报告说,苏联人“几乎毫无例外都是有着疯狂想法的犹太人”。 犹太人在新的苏维埃政权中达到这种比例是因为俄罗斯人倾向于“爱国”,因此在攻击俄罗斯同胞时不够无情,还因为犹太人再次不同于构成无产阶级运动支柱的俄罗斯“农民和工人” ,文盲。 举例来说,这本书的作者 罗西娅·埃夫雷, 俄罗斯和犹太人,讲了下面的笑话:“如果六个政委坐在一张桌子旁,桌子底下是什么? 答案是以色列的十二膝。”

被憎恨的契卡的工作人员中犹太人的比例甚至更高。 直到 10 年 1934 月 34 日,即斯大林接管该党八年后,契卡党的 17% 的领导层仍然是犹太人,这一数字是苏联犹太人口的 1939 倍。 然而,到 4 年,在党内犹太人被清除之后,这一比例下降到 XNUMX%。

由于东欧和德国的革命运动中犹太人的比例很高,布尔什维克主义被认为是一种犹太人运动,并且正因为如此,它所犯下的过激行为引起了巨大的反犹太主义反应。 20 年 1920 月 XNUMX 日,后来担任中央情报局局长的艾伦·杜勒斯写道:“由于巴伐利亚犹太人在共产主义团体中发挥主导作用,战前时代的宽容发生了变化,新的强烈反犹太主义运动应运而生。” 冯·比伯斯坦 (Von Bieberstein) 写道,“少数激进的犹太人为无产阶级专政而战,掀起了一场侵略性的反犹太主义雪崩。” 正是因为害怕这种反应,B'nai B'rith 的法兰克福分会向巴伐利亚犹太人发出指示,要求他们与库尔特·艾斯纳 (Kurt Eisner) 和他的巴伐利亚苏维埃共和国保持距离。 在一篇关于英国反犹太主义的文章中,该文章出现在 犹太社会学杂志 1989 年,杰弗里·奥尔德曼 (Geoffrey Alderman) 写道:“由于对布尔什维克主义的恐惧,反犹太主义在 20 年代盛行。” 在他 1996 年的书中 犹太人与俄国革命,哈佛历史学家理查德·派普斯声称,俄罗斯革命的“最灾难性后果”之一是“犹太人认同共产主义”。 纽伦堡战争罪行审判的法律观察员莱因哈德·莫拉赫 (Reinhard Maurach) 强调了他所谓的“组合理论”,根据该理论,“犹太人问题与布尔什维克问题相结合”形成了纳粹主义的基本轮廓。

希特勒在德国上台是因为他说服绝大多数德国人民“犹太人和布尔什维克是一回事”。 国家社会主义是对共产主义的反应。 忽视这一事实或像丹尼尔·乔纳·戈德哈根 (Daniel Jonah Goldhagen) 那样写“反犹太主义与犹太人的行为无关”,会让整个时代变得不可理解。 同样,索尔·弗里德兰德 (Saul Friedlander) 表示,“对共产主义的仇恨在希特勒崛起的过程中比反犹太态度发挥了更大的作用。”

希特勒在他的政治生涯开始时受到犹太人同化和德国人接受这一事实的阻碍,如果没有布尔什维克主义的威胁和巴伐利亚苏维埃共和国的经历,他不可能让他的追随者反对犹太人。他称之为“暂时的犹太统治”作为证据。 在 我的奋斗,希特勒写道:“在 1918 年,仍然不可能谈论程序化的反犹太主义。 我还记得一提到犹太人这个词时遇到的困难。 你要么被看成疯子,要么遇到了最强烈的抵抗。” 1933 年,希特勒对马克斯·普朗克说:“作为犹太人,我没有反对犹太人。 但犹太人都是共产主义者,他们是我的敌人,我正在与他们作战。” 作为反共产主义胜过希特勒价值观中的种族主义的证据,冯·比伯斯坦引用了希特勒的名言:“Lieber sind mir 100 Neger im Saal, als ein Jude。” “房间里一百个黑人总比一个犹太人好。” 在 10 年 1937 月 7 日的日记中,汉斯·弗兰克写道:“我承认我对德国的信仰。 . . 这实际上是上帝消灭邪恶的工具。 我们以上帝的名义反对犹太人和他们的布尔什维克主义,上帝会保护我们。” 希特勒一直坚持认为犹太人是他的敌人,主要是因为犹太人传播了革命。 在 1944 年 XNUMX 月 XNUMX 日的一次座谈会上,他仍然坚持“没有犹太人就没有革命”。 纳粹理论家阿尔弗雷德·罗森伯格 (Alfred Rosenberg) 说了很多相同的话:“布尔什维克主义本质上是犹太世界革命的形式。 . . . 没有犹太人,就没有布尔什维克主义这样的东西。”

反应是不可避免的。 “共产主义运动的成功越大,”乔纳森·弗兰克尔 (Jonathan Frankel) 在 1988 年写道,“反共产主义对犹太人的敌意就越大。” 希莱尔·贝洛克 (Hilaire Belloc) 声称“俄罗斯的革命是西欧对犹太人的仇恨重新燃起的历史起点。”

犹太电影业和民族文化

不久,同样的反应传到​​了美国。 冯·比伯斯坦声称,“清教徒式的美国”反犹太主义反应的最初迹象表现为对好莱坞新生电影业的抗议,该行业被视为由犹太人创造和控制。 在他的书中 国际犹太人,亨利福特抱怨犹太人接管百老汇剧院。 然而,他继续说,犹太人从来没有“把外邦人赶出”电影业,“因为外邦人从来没有机会进入它。” 福特声称:“美国和整个世界的电影影响完全在犹太人对公众思想的操纵、道德和经济的控制之下。” 犹太人之所以能够颠覆美国人的道德是因为

舞台和电影院代表了 90% 的人的主要文化元素。 一般年轻人所吸收的关于良好的形式、适当的举止、文雅与粗俗、言语的正确性或用词的选择、其他国家的风俗和感情、服装的时尚、宗教和法律的观念,都来自于在电影院和剧院看到。 大众对家和富人生活的唯一观念来自舞台和电影(第 153 页)。

福特继续说,任何“坦率地残酷对待品味和道德败坏的企业都不应该被允许成为一项法律。” 由于犹太布尔什维克主义和好莱坞道德颠覆的双重威胁,整个 20 年代的许多立法机构都威胁政府对电影实施审查。 正是 1934 年抵制的威胁促使哈利·华纳警告米高梅执行官哈里·拉普夫,他的儿子在 1934 年夏天访问了苏联,“我不想和任何 g*d**** 共产党人交谈。 . 别忘了你是犹太人。 犹太共产主义者将平息世界对其他犹太人的愤怒。”

事实证明,世界的愤怒在美国比在德国更温和,但反应也发生在那里。 在美国,它采取了抵制费城华纳剧院的形式。 此次抵制活动由该市天主教主教红衣主教多尔蒂 (Cardinal Dougherty) 组织,在大萧条最严重的时期每周花费 100,000 美元,并使他在公司会议上“泪流满面”。 华纳和其他好莱坞的犹太大亨最终同意将《生产守则》作为他们摆脱财务困境的出路。

福特钦佩天主教徒对犹太好莱坞的抵抗,甚至在该法典实施之前。 与在好莱坞电影中经常被嘲笑的新教神职人员不同,

天主教神职人员很快就反对这种滥用他们祭司尊严的行为,由于他们强烈的不满,犹太人爬了下来。 你现在永远不会在屏幕上看到一个被轻视的牧师。 但这位新教牧师仍然是反基督教漫画中那个拉长的、流鼻涕的、胆怯的伪君子。

福特认为这些电影是美国革命的彩排。 犹太人正在使用屏幕作为他们“颠覆传统运动”的一部分。 电影屏幕还“作为反社会威胁场景的排练舞台。 除了那些有计划和排练的起义或革命之外,没有任何起义或革命。 . . . 成功的革命必须经过彩排。 它可以在电影中做得比其他任何地方都好:这就是“视觉教育”,这是最低级的人所能理解的。”

不久之后,很明显,当犹太人来到美国时,他们带来了革命。 由于犹太人占俄罗斯犹太人口的一半,美国有一个共产党,其中超过 50% 的成员来自犹太家庭。 这些犹太人中的许多人在来到美国后改了名字,在那里他们继续他们的革命活动,这让福特和考夫林等人大吃一惊。 一些犹太革命者出生在美国,然后返回俄罗斯。 Israel Amter 于 1881 年出生于美国。1923 年他前往俄罗斯,在那里他成为了 EKKI 的成员。 然后他改名为“约翰福特”,回到纽约,领导共产党。 1921 年,前匈牙利苏维埃共和国贝拉·昆 (Bela Kun) 政委约瑟夫·波加尼 (Josef Pogany) 加入共产国际,后者于 1922 年将他运往美国,并在那里取名为“约翰·佩珀 (John Pepper)”并成为 事实上的 美国共产党的领袖。 一个名叫雅各布·戈洛斯的乌克兰犹太人,以“蒂米”为封面,创建了一个间谍网络,其中包括受过瓦萨教育的间谍伊丽莎白·本特利,她在麦卡锡委员会听证会上作证时获得了 15 分钟的名望。 50 多岁。

托洛茨基本人表示,犹太人将在将革命带到美国方面发挥决定性作用。 在该杂志 1934 年发表的一篇采访中 阶级斗争托洛茨基声称,“外国血统的犹太工人将在实现美国无产阶级革命方面发挥决定性作用。” 难怪亨利福特不高兴吗? 反布尔什维克 杂志写道,对俄罗斯布尔什维克主义的反应如此之大,以至于它甚至在美国也引发了“新一轮的反犹太主义浪潮”。 即使在没有发生过俄罗斯、德国和匈牙利那样的革命的美国,路易斯·马歇尔也注意到“犹太共产主义”一词正在流行。

考虑到欧洲对犹太布尔什维克主义的反应,罗斯书中最大的悬而未决的问题是为什么同样的事情没有发生在这里。 或者,更重要的是,他为什么幻想它会这样做。 在 NPR 对 Roth 的采访中,Robert Siegel 通过询问 Roth 是“幸运的休息还是美国的经历本质上不同”来回答为什么它没有在这里发生的问题。 罗斯回答说两者都是,这是他不知道答案的另一种说法。 他在他的书中没有那么模棱两可,他将没有大屠杀归因于“美国宪法中嵌入的保证”,“结合美国长期存在的民主传统,使得犹太人问题的最终解决方案不可能在美国在一个有着数千年反犹太主义根深蒂固历史的大陆上迅速或有效地发展,在那里纳粹统治是绝对的。”

所以我们再次回到标准解释。 也就是说,它没有发生在这里,因为反犹太主义的真正根源基督教在这里没有欧洲那么强大。 当然,有各种各样的证据,尤其是在罗斯的书中,与这种解释相矛盾。 反犹太主义的整个威胁 情节 是基于纽瓦克和其他地方的天主教会的存在,这种存在在年轻的菲利普身上引起了严重的矛盾情绪。 有一次,他对天主教会充满了厌恶; 另一方面,他想逃到由德国修女经营的天主教孤儿院。 罗斯的“美国反犹狂怒通过 22 号公路向东咆哮的噩梦”的前提是,美国的反犹主义者都是敬畏上帝的基督徒,或者所有敬畏上帝的基督徒都是反犹太主义者。 当然,这意味着它应该在这里发生,尤其是如果像许多人所说的那样,基督教在这里比在感性的世俗欧洲更强大。

在他的评论中 情节 in 纽约时报,弗兰克·里奇试图通过将罗斯的恐惧与 9/11 之后的布什政府联系起来来解释罗斯的恐惧,尽管罗斯在同一篇论文中建议不要将这部小说作为“当今时代的罗马谱号”来阅读。 Rich 在 Lindbergh 中看到,“总统 [who] 可以使用恐惧。 . . 施加危险的 修复”关于美国,显然是指乔治·W·布什。 当 Rich 阅读 情节令他印象深刻的是“他所描述的‘永远的恐惧’在某些方面是我们现在生活的恐惧的表亲。 当然,‘永远的恐惧’定义了我们在 9/11 之后的世界——以及 2004 年秋季的无情选举年政治。” Rich 然后将恐惧与美国的外交政策联系起来。 尽管布什的先发制人战争政策是“罗斯福的化身”和“林德伯格孤立主义的对立面”,但这项冒险的最终结果还没有出来:

事实上,我们才刚刚开始接受考验。 我们仍处于两场战争的早期阶段,而这场战争的结局还遥遥无期。 伊拉克战争已经被南卡罗来纳州参议员弗里茨霍林斯(支持克里的民主党人)以及像顽固的帕特布坎南这样的右翼分子寄托在犹太新保守派身上,好像非犹太总统和副总统不是在它的建筑师中。

那么,如果伊拉克战争恶化(或更糟),犹太新保守主义者将被追究责任,肯塔基州将爆发大屠杀? 政治再次成为偏执幻想的借口。 将里奇和罗斯联系起来的是一种共同的心态,而不是对美国外交政策的客观解读。

另一方面,Roth 的书中有很多内容与 Rich 的分析不符。 罗斯本人对关于 9/11 事件的说法提出异议,声称他是在 2001 年 XNUMX 月开始的。罗斯还在接受约翰弗里曼的采访时声称 时代花絮 他“非常努力地处理这些我童年时代的人物,其中一些人在我小时候对我来说非常可怕,比如考夫林神父。” 弗里曼继续说,罗斯“记得考夫林周日晚上的广播讲话——其中经常包括对著名犹太人物的攻击——就像他记得在收音机里听到希特勒的声音一样生动。”

但是,坐在文坛顶端的罗斯为什么要害怕一个被普遍妖魔化的天主教神父? 60多年了? 最终,罗斯的恐惧没有客观依据——这在一部基于未发生事件的小说中应该不会令人惊讶。 他恐惧的基础是他对基督教的仇恨。 从神学的角度来看,这应该不足为奇,因为“完美的爱可以驱散恐惧”。 如果爱能驱除恐惧,如果“仇恨是犹太人的美德”,正如我们在 第一件事 (参见我的作品“模拟弥赛亚:犹太幽默和文化颠覆”, 文化战争, 2004 年 XNUMX 月),那么犹太人应该被恐惧吞噬也就不足为奇了。 毕竟,在希腊语中,仇恨和恐惧是同一个词, 恐惧症. 你害怕你讨厌的东西; 你讨厌你害怕的东西。 基督是唯一一位向我们指明走出那个恶性循环的道路的人。 但是,根据罗斯的说法,基督正是问题所在。 在再次表达他的恐惧时 情节,罗斯幻想爱尔兰天主教徒出现在纽瓦克,“寻求报复犹太人第三区的基督杀手。” 自由派神职人员在梵蒂冈二世之后做出的所有保证都让罗斯不相信。 他仍然认为犹太人是基督的杀手。 在某些时候,他为这个事实而欢欣鼓舞; 在其他时候,这让他显然感到不安。

基督是问题

在跟随一个可疑的 goy 回家后——年轻的 Philip 和他的年轻朋友 Earl 玩的游戏——他们凝视着 goy 的前窗,看到他客厅里有一棵圣诞树,然后厄尔低声说:“看到顶部了吗? 在树的最顶端——看到了吗? 是耶稣。” 耶稣的异象成为小菲利普的顿悟:

这就是我们追求的高潮——耶稣基督,根据他们的推理,他就是一切,而根据我的推理,他把一切都搞砸了,因为如果没有基督,就不会有基督徒,如果没有'没有基督徒就不会有反犹太主义,如果没有反犹太主义就不会有希特勒,如果没有希特勒,林德伯格就永远不会成为总统,如果林德伯格不是。 t总统。 . . . [他的省略号]。

当男孩邀请两个男孩进来喝杯热巧克力时,厄尔喊道:“打败它,菲尔——这是个仙女!” 两个男孩都逃跑了。

年轻的菲利普被既软弱又强大的基督所吸引和排斥,这是罗斯无法理解的。 一方面,他想逃到纽瓦克的德国天主教孤儿院或弗拉纳根神父的男孩镇。 另一方面,他害怕“孤儿、神父、修女和教区学校的鞭子”,尽管天主教鞭子似乎不太可能用在犹太男孩身上。 像其他犹太孩子一样,小菲利普“通常会在我们看到他们穿着巫婆服装在我们面前晃来晃去的极少数情况下过马路。” 就像性变态的罗斯 波特诺伊的投诉,年轻的菲利普“无法靠近一位修女,更不用说他们中的一对了,我一点也不纯洁的犹太思想”,尽管修女们善待他:“较高的修女低头微笑”,当她在公共汽车上遇见菲利普时,“她平静的声音中带着模糊的悲伤——也许是因为弥赛亚在我不知情的情况下来了又走了——对她的同伴评论说,'多好- 可爱的小男孩。'”

罗斯是否害怕这个修女会在纽瓦克领导一场大屠杀? 嗯,是的,在某种程度上他是,但这个想法与他的“不太纯粹的犹太思想”有关,这是他后来在讨论乔治亚州利奥·弗兰克的私刑时发展起来的,弗兰克被指控骚扰 13一岁的 Mary Phagan,他工厂的一名员工。 根据罗斯的说法,“将‘鸡奸’”弗兰克挂在玛丽·帕根的家乡乔治亚州玛丽埃塔的一棵树上,是“对其他‘犹太放荡者’的公开警告,让他们远离南方,远离他们的女人。” 由于罗斯在书中很好地描述了“犹太浪子”的行为和思想。 波特诺伊的投诉,即使他们没有被私刑处死,陪审团也可以毫不费力地将他们定罪。

换句话说,恐惧可能是由仇恨造成的,但它会因内疚而加剧。 根据罗斯自己的说法,犹太人在美国从俄罗斯的大屠杀中欢迎他们之后,在美国的行为令人憎恶。 罗斯曾告诉我们,作为一个孩子,他已经“开始认为自己是一个小罪犯,因为我是犹太人。” 罗斯做出这样的声明是为了引起同情,但即使这样做,他也再次向我们指出内疚。 从他的回忆录式小说来看,有足够的个人内疚来保证任何数量的强烈感受,但由于这本质上是一本民族书,我们也在谈论民族内疚。 首先,罗斯对犹太人入侵美国感到内疚。 正如拉比拉宾所说,美国对犹太人很好,像菲利普罗斯这样的犹太人通过促进文化颠覆来回报美国。 Portnoy 是一个犹太人,他的主要幸福在于揭穿 goyim 同时玷污她们的女人,他在华盛顿的一个国会委员会做了一件事情:“是的,”他告诉他的分析师,

我是华盛顿那边的一个快乐的 yiddel,我自己的一个小斯特恩帮派,忙着宣扬查理的荣誉和正直,同时成为 XNUMX 世纪前辈到达这些海岸的贵族洋基美女的爱好者。 被称为“讨厌你的 Goy 也吃一个”的现象。

当菲利普的父亲从纽瓦克驱车前往肯塔基并再次返回营救谢尔顿威斯诺时,罗斯借此机会将这次旅行变成了犹太人移民美国的象征。 “可以做一个类比,”罗斯告诉我们,描述了去肯塔基州的车程,

对于那些不请自来的白人定居者,他们首先穿过阿巴拉契亚的屏障涌入特拉华州和阿冈昆部落最喜欢的狩猎场,除了这些外来的、长相奇怪的白人以他们的贪婪来侮辱当地居民之外,他们是外来的、长相奇怪的犹太人仅仅因为他们的存在。 然而,这一次,那些用暴力捍卫自己的土地免遭篡夺和生活方式免遭破坏的人不是由伟大的特库姆塞领导的印第安人,而是由美国代理总统释放的正直美国基督徒。

地球上没有哪个国家,甚至波兰,都像美国一样欢迎犹太人。 现在,从 1881 年沙皇被暗杀后的大屠杀中逃脱的犹太人的孙子孙女们再次幻想大屠杀,而我们其他人则不得不想知道为什么。 罗斯通过让我们深入了解产生这些幻想的困扰的心理,在这方面为我们所有人提供了服务。 最终是罗斯的仇恨 goyim,没有任何历史先例,这让他可以幻想大屠杀来自肯塔基州和底特律以及纽瓦克的天主教民族社区:

在纽瓦克,有一个犹太人密集的社区,毗邻由爱尔兰人、意大利人、德国人和斯拉夫人组成的大型工人阶级社区,这些社区已经是大量偏执者的家园。 假设是,这些人不需要太多的鼓励就能被亲纳粹的阴谋塑造成一个无意识的破坏性暴徒,成功地策划了底特律的骚乱。

“假设?” 除了罗斯之外,我们不得不问谁的假设? 罗斯没有看到,如果这些社区中存在反犹太主义,它是由犹太布尔什维克主义的过激行为产生的,这些消息从布达佩斯、华沙和慕尼黑等地传播到纽瓦克、哈姆特拉克和南本德等地。 种族社区定期与他们的欧洲同行交流,这引起了路易斯沃斯的极大关注。 天主教徒坚决反对共产主义。 犹太人同样坚决支持共产主义。 然而,尽管存在敌意,美国并没有发生大屠杀。 罗斯没有看到“它没有发生在这里”,因为共产主义者从未在美国上台。 如果他们有,这里可能会发生血腥的反应,正如林德伯格预测的那样。 归根结底,罗斯的恐惧可能与他的文化力量有关。 如果东欧的犹太人对布尔什维克主义的过激行为负责,是否有人要为文化恐怖主义行为负责,例如 波特诺伊的投诉对美国的阴谋? 新保守党要为伊拉克的崩溃负责吗?

罗斯的小说在最后分崩离析,因为他的愤怒和对他讨厌的人的矛盾心理不连贯。 本来可以被描绘成在卷入事件的个人之间来回切换的惊悚片,结果却是臃肿和反高潮。 罗斯似乎被自己的幻想吓到了,宣布罗斯福回到白宫,因此,一切都好起来,以一种奇怪的闪进方式破坏了情节,然后以下列方式旋转:沃尔特温切尔因“在肯塔基州说出自己的想法”而被暗杀。 . . 被美国的纳粹分子“; Wishnow 夫人是菲利普的邻居,她被运往肯塔基州接受美国化,她被一群肆虐的纳粹暴徒杀害,并被留在“路易斯维尔南部平坦国家的马铃薯田旁的排水沟里”。 林德伯格飞往路易斯维尔镇压暴徒,但在回家的路上,他的飞机神秘地消失了,这让伯顿·惠勒总统“现在将我们知道的纳粹强加给德国犹太儿童的法律强加给我们”,甚至虽然“希特勒已经确定 [亨利福特] 作为林德伯格的继任者。” 考虑到潜伏在哈德逊河以西的反犹太主义者的数量,罗斯的父亲和兄弟不得不开车前往肯塔基州,以营救威斯诺夫人的儿子,这使他的人身危险很大。 而且,最重要的是,拉比本格尔斯多夫,这个带着南方口音说话的狡猾的德国犹太人(我想是为了表明他的恶行的深度)“被联邦调查局拘留,怀疑是他们的头目之一。犹太人对美国的阴谋。”

可怕的内疚

我们又回到了犹太版 透过窥镜. 如果罗斯的观点是与革命政权合作的犹太人这样做,后果自负, 这是一个值得提出的观点。 但在 1930 年代最臭名昭著的不是亨利福特,也不是查尔斯林德伯格,也不是查尔斯考夫林,而是罗斯福的反犹英雄约瑟夫斯大林,他在 1937 年的表演审判中一一清洗犹太人. 当罗马尼亚中央委员会秘书马塞尔·鲍克在被斯大林的手下处决之前模仿西诺维耶夫的犹太口音高喊“听着,以色列,你的上帝是独一的”时,斯大林大笑起来。 如果罗斯读过曼弗雷德·格奥尔格 (Manfred Georg) 的文章“犹太革命者” 世界报 1930 年,他就会知道“所有的革命都会吞噬他们的犹太人”。 “革命的犹太人”在革命的车轮上被高高举起,“长时间保持在上面”,但当他开始下沉时,恐怖就开始了。 冯·比伯斯坦引用了西蒙·杜布诺 (Simon Dubnow) 的话,后者在回忆录中写道,“由于犹太人参与布尔什维克主义而给他们带来了沉重的负罪感”。

所以也许这解释了罗斯的恐惧。 恐惧在 2004 年得到表达,当时国务院在犹太文化影响力的顶峰建立了一个办公室来追踪世界各地的反犹太主义。 恐惧总是革命的副产品。 玛丽·沃斯通克拉夫特在巴黎注意到了这一点,当时“公民卡佩”被拖走处决了; Christopher Isherwood 在柏林也注意到了同样的事情。 革命总是吞噬它的犹太人。 因此,罗斯的恐惧。 9/11 之后,弗兰克·里奇在美国注意到了这一点。 革命的犹太人带动了革命的车轮。 他们中的许多人在同一个车轮下被碾压,这一事实不应让我们忽视他们所承担的责任。 那种内疚会继续有不幸的心理 后遗症,最明显的是恐惧和内疚,正如菲利普罗斯的小说中所表达的那样,直到悔改和皈依将它带走。

 
隐藏295条评论发表评论
忽略评论者...跟随Endorsed Only
修剪评论?
    []
  1. “… Roth fantasizes Irish Catholics showing up in Newark, “seeking vengeance against the Christ-killers of the Jewish Third Ward.””

    In Woody Allen’s recent autobiography “Apropos of Nothing”, in a chapter where he reminisces about his high school years in Brooklyn, he mentions a pal named “David Panich, who had a different loaded gun within easy reach in every room of his apartment because he suspected an imminent Nazi uprising.”

    • 回复: @Richard B
    , @Wally
    , @Seraphim
    , @Ray P
    , @anon
  2. obwandiyag 说:

    Arguing with a novel is kind of conceptually dopey.

    And calling Portnoy’s Complaint a call for sexual liberation is like calling the Three Stooges a meditation on violence.

    Portnoy’s Complaint was just a tour-de-force of dirtiness to get Roth noticed.

    • 同意: Kolya Krassotkin
    • 回复: @Pheasant
    , @PeterMX
    , @vinteuil
    , @ivan
  3. Roth is pronounced rot. Good name for a rotten person.

  4. My general impression of E. Michael Fanatic is that he is against the Jews because they don’t accept Papal rule over his Judeo-Christian religion. As bad as Protestants in his mind.

    I’m waiting to be enlightened, waiting for him to show me the place in the NT where Jesus rules that there is such a thing as Apostolic Succession, meaning the present Roman Pope is an apostle.

  5. Bundespresident Friedrich Ebert

    Reichs总统

    The Weimar Republic consisted of federal states just like the Kaiserreich was a federation of quasi-independent principalities. The collective was the “Reich”.
    Only for about 1000 years (1933-45, arguably a bit longer ind the later GDR) was Germany a centralized state.

    • 回复: @sally
  6. Pheasant 说:
    @obwandiyag

    How many novels have you argued with?

    • 哈哈: Jim Bob Lassiter
    • 回复: @Mefobils
  7. I had many books written by scholars on the Holocaust published by the university press but none of them explained what this essay covers. I had been fed the lie that so called antisemitism was entirely the product of irrational Christian persecution based on collective guilt of Jews as Christ killers. I now understand that fear is the most likely explanation for this i.e. those scholars quite possibly knew the historical background for antipathy towards Jews as a tribe but were not prepared to risk their position, finances and reputation by telling the truth.

    The tribe have dropped the atomic cultural bomb on the West and followed it up with a comprehensive carpet bombing of any vestiges of Western values. Their control of the media, finance and politics through graft and the mammon god they worship seems now total. Who dares speak up in imitation.of Jesus in his excoriating rebukes towards the tribe? They haven’t changed in millennia because its still the same spirit which drives them and that spirit which hates goodness also hates human beings.

    Jesus is described as refusing the offer of the entire world by the god of the Jews if only he would worship it. The NT says the prince of this world is not god and that effectively this world is a war zone in which the true measure of a person is what they did behind enemy lines – take the offer which the Jews have accepted i.e. the ephemeral baubles of this world or stand up for truth against lies.

    • 回复: @Wally
    , @Emslander
    , @T. Weed
  8. Jake 说:

    What Jones grasps, and which serves to undergird everything he writes, is that this kulturkampf is a spiritual/religious war. Either you are on the side of Christ and Christendom, or you are a revolutionary against Christ and Christendom.

    What Jones knows – and should be obvious from the above – is that the Reformation was a revolution against Christendom, and that Jews played an indispensable role in spreading Reformation ideas and violence.

    Another thing that Jones knows that is not noted in this article is that English-speaking Protestant culture, WASP culture, is uniquely philo-Semitic and has been so among its Elites since at least the rule of archetypal WASP Oliver Cromwell, who made Jewish bankers central to the spread of WASP empire and WASP culture.

  9. Jake 说:
    @Ann Nonny Mouse

    And Satan is waiting to be shown that he must serve.

    Those who embrace non serviam always serve with Satan.

    I suggest that you prove that the Reformation and particularly the WASP product have not served the cause of violent revolution time and again as well as general cultural pollution and perversion, all of it bound up with loosening Jews to run amuck in orgiastic acquisition and revolution.

    现实情况是,正如有很多犹太人(您可能是其中的一个成员)会故意选择撒但而不是服侍基督和基督教世界一样,也有许多新教徒(和穆斯林)同样会选择撒但而不是服侍基督和基督教世界。 。

    A akin purpose of such people is to keep leading people into Satanic non serviam. Hence your post.

    • 哈哈: Ann Nonny Mouse
    • 巨魔: Druid
    • 回复: @Druid
    , @anonymous
    , @anonymous
  10. wesmouch 说:

    几年前我读过《反美阴谋》一书,被罗斯先生(根据他的角色)对戈伊姆的明显蔑视所震惊。 让我感到非常困惑的是,有毒部落生活在野兽(基督教)的腹中并试图将其打倒。 或许他们愚蠢到相信他们对周围的goyim的蔑视不会有什么不好的结果。 但话又说回来,他们可能希望激起对自己的仇恨。 转到 youtube 并观看 Barbara Lerner Spectre 谈论犹太人引入多元文化。 她津津有味地指出,犹太人会因为这样做而受到憎恨。 有点病。 有毒部落似乎拥有不成比例的世界反社会人士。

    • 回复: @Hamlet's Ghost
    , @mark green
  11. This is the good Jones; the bad Jones is the fellow who tells us that race doesn’t exist, and that a Caucasian American woman marrying an African pygmy is fine as long as said pygmy is Catholic.

    • 不同意: Fuerchtegott
    • 哈哈: northeast
  12. @Ann Nonny Mouse

    “And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.” – 马修 16:17-18

  13. The premise of the novel is that Charles Lindbergh was elected president in 1940. Everything else in the book follows from that premise and from Roth’s ethnic paranoia and his ethnic bigotry. The most significant thing about Roth’s book is the fact that it’s fiction.

    Gilad Atzmon sometimes jokingly mentions his idea that many Jews suffer from PTSD, meaning -Traumatic Stress Disorder, because they’re always freaking out over things that haven’t happened yet. But 情节 is an example of something even weirder: a Jew (Roth) freaking out over something that never happened at all. What should we call this? HTSD – Hypothetical Traumatic Stress Disorder?

    If Lindbergh was talking about Europe, however, he was profoundly right in a way that no one could have understood at the time. War provided the cover for the annihilation of large numbers of Jews in Europe.

    或者他们声称。

    Like many Jews, Roth subscribes to the dogma that anti-Semitism is a pathology whose source is Christianity and which is, therefore, inseparable from Christianity. As a result, anti-Semitism has no relationship to Jewish behavior.

    What few Jews will ever admit is that the opposite is closer to the truth: Jewish anti-Christianism came first and was a product of the Babylonian Talmud of the Dark Ages, many centuries before any pogroms started up in Russia.

    National Socialism was a reaction to communism. To ignore this fact or to write as Daniel Jonah Goldhagen does that “anti-Semitism has nothing to do with Jewish behavior” is to render an entire era incomprehensible.

    Indeed, several eras!

    Hitler was stymied at the beginning of his political career by both Jewish assimilation and German acceptance of that fact …

    Moreover, there’s no evidence that even Hitler himself had any animosity towards the Jews before the First World War. According to his biographers, his attitude towards them really only darkened noticeably after the Russian Revolution.

    According to Roth’s own account, the Jews have behaved abominably in America, after America welcomed them from the pogroms of Russia.

    And that’s what really hurts: the knowledge that we let these people into our country genuinely (if naïvely) believing that all that misfortune which historically transpired in Europe could safely be left behind, now that we a constitution guaranteeing religious freedom. We assumed that now that they could live peaceable among us, all hostility towards us would subside, enabling us truly to become fellow countrymen.

    And then to realize that our good will was so crassly taken advantage of; our hopes for a new start so cruelly exploited and betrayed! It’s enough to make just about anyone a ‘hater,’ I suppose …

  14. Dumbo 说:

    I don’t know if it’s because of their guilty conscience or other reason, but Jews are extremely paranoid.

    I mean no other ethnic-religious group had it (and still has it) so good in America, and yet they keep inventing paranoid fantasies and complaining of “anti-semitism”, as if they were in a concentration camp. It’s just insane.

    另一种选择是犹太人有点受虐狂,他们实际上喜欢被仇恨,如果人们太喜欢他们,他们就会变得焦躁不安和不舒服。

  15. wesmouch 说:
    @Dumbo

    我开始相信后者是正确的。 有一种希望被讨厌的特殊倾向

    • 回复: @FactChecker
  16. “The only purpose of this so-called Just Folks,” Roth tells us, “is to make Jewish children into a fifth column and turn them against their parents.”

    So Roth fears Jewish children being indoctrinated by gentiles to turn against their community?

    In the real world, Jewish youth everywhere in the Western Hemisphere are given ample opportunity to attend Jewish primary schools, attend Jewish summer camps, belong to Jewish community centers, join Jewish activist organizations in post-secondary, go on ‘birthright’ trips to Israel, take Israeli citizenship and serve in its military, become members of ethnic professional development initiatives aimed at giving them a leg up, and then take their place in the private and political strata, networking with their co-ethnics for wealth and power. Jewish offspring are managed from cradle to grave to take the torch from their parents.

    If Europeans attempted such solidarity the ADL and B’nai B’rith would be screaming for the government to put a boot on their necks, just as they do now.

    Instead, European children are indoctrinated in division and criticism of their own culture, much helped by Jewish efforts of the past half century.

    Yes, Roth is projecting his guilt.

  17. @wesmouch

    那是因为他们 ,那恭喜你, 反社会者。 犹太教只是披着宗教外衣的反社会人格。

    反犹太主义的真相是犹太人需要它。 他们需要被仇恨,因此在他们反社会的头脑中,他们为自己的仇恨辩护。

    One point that Mr. Jones could have mentioned was the very high rate of intermarriage between Jews and Germans in 1920s Germany. I’ve heard this mentioned a propos of a wistful “what if” scenario. Oh, if only Hitler had not entered the world stage in the 1930s, then the “Jewish quesiton” would have solved itself as Jews themselves were dissolved into the German general population.

    这种假设被排除在外的是,正是这种明显的同化促成了布尔什维克病毒。 卡尔·马克思不仅出生于一长串拉比,而且他和他的父亲都是正式皈依路德教的人。 卡尔本人嫁给了普鲁士贵族,尽管他不知疲倦地工作以摧毁天真地接纳他和他的同类的社会基础。

    Lesson for today: You can’t pet a rattlesnake.

    • 回复: @G J T
    , @ThreeCranes
  18. Lot 说:

    I like this article’s discussion of the book, which I didn’t read. Jones shows the unpleasant side of Roth that other writers have warned about and kept me from reading any of his books.

    The HBO show is discussed less here. My thoughts:

    I enjoyed it. Not because I agree with its “message,” but because it is simply a really good historical action-drama set in 1940-41 America, which isn’t something that’s ever got a top quality depiction before. There’s a lot set in WWII or the Depression, but the USA from 40-41 is an odd but interesting transitional period.

    I don’t think the movie can be described as Jewish propaganda at all. Most of the adult Jewish characters are portrayed negatively: cowards, hotheads, closed-minded, nerdy dweebs, pretty criminals, political grifters. And Mrs Lindburgh gets a well rounded and positive treatment.

    Overall, it is a very good show with some top tier actors and sets. Forcing it into a JQ obsession framework both doesn’t work and ruins its strong entertainment value.

    • 回复: @Pericles
    , @Mia Culpa
  19. anarchyst 说:
    @Dumbo

    Just a theory of mine…

    Jewish paranoia can be traced to the evil, demonic practice of “male genital mutilation”, known as “circumcision”.

    This barbaric practice is imposed on jewish males on the eight day after birth without the use of any anesthetic. As the infant’s brain is still developing, the additional pain and trauma imposed “rewires” the brain in a negative way.

    Not only is the infant’s penis mutilated, the jewish “mohel” then proceeds to fellate the infant. This is a good way to introduce venereal diseases and STDs from the “mohel” to the infant.

    It would be interesting to screen all jewish males for venereal diseases and STDs on a long-term basis. I’ll bet that over 75% of jewish males are harboring venereal diseases or STDs.

    Just maybe this is why jewish males are so f#cked up.

  20. Saggy 说: • 您的网站

    War provided the cover for the annihilation of large numbers of Jews in Europe.

    There is something fundamentally wrong with the mind of E.M. Jones who repeats the preposterous lies of the holohoax but will not bother to justify them.

    I’m coming to believe that all ‘Christians’ are the Jews’ whores.

    • 回复: @Robjil
    , @FactChecker
  21. Observator 说:

    It’s a myth that Hitler rose to power solely by scapegoating Jews. We are given the impression that vitriolic Jew-hatred was every party rally’s theme, that the rafters shook with the roars of approval of bloodthirsty murderers incited to animalistic fury.

    我们应该不知道或不关心大多数德国人甚至从未见过犹太人,因为犹太人仅占德国人口的 XNUMX%。

    In fact people supported the party for its pledges to rebuild the economy, to get them decent jobs and affordable housing, food, clothing, and medical care, to get back the land and the millions of their countrymen that were stripped from Germany after the Great War, to rebuild the army into a force strong enough to repel the rapacious British and French empires when their next attack came. And these goals were nearly all achieved in Hitler’s first Four Year Plan. An unbiased account is online at https://archive.org/details/HitlersRevolutionByRichardTedor_383

    自由民主的失败以及国际资本主义和苏联共产主义的致命危险也是政治老练的德国观众热烈响应的热门话题。 在我的研究中,最令我惊讶的是发现德国政治理论家准确警告美国即将成为和平与国际合作的最大威胁,甚至超过斯大林统治世界的残酷野心的苏联。

    • 回复: @Curmudgeon
  22. Pericles 说:
    @Lot

    Overall, it is a very good show with some top tier actors and sets. Forcing it into a JQ obsession framework both doesn’t work and ruins its strong entertainment value.

    Is this what they call ‘chutzpah’?

    • 回复: @Felix Culpa
  23. Pericles 说:
    @anarchyst

    Aren’t basically all Americans circumcised? Disgusting habit, by the way.

    Well, at least you don’t have the problem that distinguishing friend from enemy can be as easy as ordering them to drop their pants.

  24. @Pericles

    Yeah,but we’ll do it anyway,just to embarrass them.

  25. Dumbo 说:

    犹太人很累。

    I’ve read quite a few of Roth’s novels by the way. Not this one which always seemed to me a bit gimmicky. Some are good but it’s Jew Jewety Jewy Jew all the time. “American Pastoral” is one of the few that isn’t and focuses on more general themes.

    But, all in all, I wouldn’t put him in my list of great writers. He’s too 20th-Century-American-Jewish to be too interesting for long.

    A more interesting novel is the one by the other Roth, Joseph Roth, “The Spider’s Web”, which implies that there were certain Jews manipulating even the rise of nationalistic violence and future war in Germany in the early 20s. Because they hate the goys and want them to fight among themselves. Really. There is a Jewish character in this novel by a Jewish writer from 1923 who says just that.

    • 谢谢: Saggy
  26. @Beavertales

    “The only purpose of this so-called Just Folks,” Roth tells us, “is to make Jewish children into a fifth column and turn them against their parents.”

    Very similar to what the Jew-Bolsheviks in the Soviet Union did to the kids there–making them turn on (and turn in) their own parents: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pavlik_Morozov

    More Jewish projection!

  27. anarchyst 说:
    @Pericles

    Yes, “male genital mutilation” is commonplace in the USA due to promotion by the “health community” as a hygiene issue, which is totally dishonest.
    If I had my way, “male genital mutilation” would be banned. If jews or muslims want it done they can travel to israel or some other sh!thole and have it done.
    At least, here in the USA there is no “mohel” to fellate the infant and pass on jewish STDs or venereal diseases.

  28. Swanny 说:

    Jews are bad. I’ve experienced it my self.

  29. By the way, if anyone here is interested in a more fulsome treatment of Charles Lindberg, 逆流 recently ran a fantastic four-part series on him. The first three installments deal with Lindberg himself and with the real history of the America First Committee, while the fourth installment critically evaluates the new HBO series:

    https://www.counter-currents.com/2020/04/charles-lindbergh/
    https://www.counter-currents.com/2020/04/the-plot-against-america-first/
    https://www.counter-currents.com/2020/04/the-plot-against-america-first-part-three-who-wanted-war/
    https://www.counter-currents.com/2020/04/hbos-the-plot-against-america/

    • 谢谢: Saggy
    • 回复: @Fluesterwitz
    , @anonymous
  30. @Dumbo

    I don’t know if it’s because of their guilty conscience or other reason, but Jews are extremely paranoid.

    I mean no other ethnic-religious group had it (and still has it) so good in America, and yet they keep inventing paranoid fantasies and complaining of “anti-semitism”, as if they were in a concentration camp. It’s just insane.

    另一种选择是犹太人有点受虐狂,他们实际上喜欢被仇恨,如果人们太喜欢他们,他们就会变得焦躁不安和不舒服。

    Ashkenazi Jews are prone to schizophrenia and similar afflictions.

    However, some Mizrahis are just as unstable mentally. My favorite specimen is Rachel Shabi the Israeli-born journalist based in Blighty who is ever unhinged.

    I suppose group narcissism is another factor.

    • 回复: @Ann Nonny Mouse
  31. RVBlake 说:

    So, Catholic neighborhoods were targeted by the Office of War Information in its Negroes to the North campaign? To weaken Catholic solidarity and break up the influence of Catholic votes? Not Whites, but Catholics? Hmmm

  32. @Digital Samizdat

    One can blow that passage apart by simply reading John chapter 1. Simon bar Jonah happened to be the first of the group to speak up and only said what his brother had told him to say, who in turn learned it from John the Baptist. And common sense makes it obvious that it is Simon’s answer, the fact that Jesus is the Christ, the son of the living God, not Simon himself, is the foundation of the Church, the rock on which it’s built.

    But you’ve entirely missed the point. Taking that Matthew passage at face value, you’ve still missed the point. Those words of Christ are addressed to one person, a mortal man, 2000 years ago. How could Peter being the rock be inherited by someone else? How could the fact that Peter is an Apostle be inherited by someone else, and passed on by Apostolic Succession over milennia? How can such a thing as Apostolic Succession exist except by there being a passage in the NT saying that a successor to Peter’s role could exist, and that successor would himself be an Apostle?

    It is a peculiar claim. There would have to be a Bible passage on the specific point. You are unaware of one but it is absolutely key. That you are unaware of such a passage and point at one irrelevant to the issue speaks for itself.

    I think by only coming up with that passage in Matthew, which doesn’t create succession, you have admitted that the claim of the Roman Popes to be the Apostle or an Apostle is bogus.

    • 回复: @Digital Samizdat
    , @Anon
    , @Alden
  33. Tiny but important typo:

    “Jewish Bolshevism has demonstrated to the entire world that the Jewish race is 也不 suffering from degeneracy.”

    Is “nor” supposed to be “now” or “not”?

    Thanks for a top-notch contribution to the education of Catholics and truth-loving people everywhere, E M Jones.

    Vade ad Deum.

    ________

    to RVBlake @ #33: “So, Catholic neighborhoods were targeted by the Office of War Information in its Negroes to the North campaign? To weaken Catholic solidarity and break up the influence of Catholic votes? Not Whites, but Catholics? Hmmm”

    是的。
    “White” did not become a category until quite recently.
    Maybe you’re very young.
    Neighborhoods were ETHNIC — Italian, Polish, Hungarian, etc., not “white”; and those ethnicities had their ethnic Catholic parishes as their center.
    Interstate and beltway highway systems went a long way to shattering parish-centric cohesiveness.

    • 回复: @Curmudgeon
  34. @Ann Nonny Mouse

    So Jesus only intended for the church to last as long as Peter was alive? If not, then how else could it have survived if not through some form of disciplic succession? (Remember: the Bible didn’t exist yet and it wouldn’t exist in a canonical form for a couple centuries to come.)

    In demanding a more precise wording from the Bible on this subject than what’s there, realize that you’re asking a lot. There are other important points of Christian belief, such as the doctrine of
    soteriology or the nature of the relationship between the distinct ‘persons’ of the Holy Trinity, that also have to be teased out of some rather cryptic passages of the Bible.

    • 回复: @Ann Nonny Mouse
  35. thotmonger 说:

    Since September 11, 1941 Charles Lindbergh’s face has been put on a hundred million rolls of pejorative toilet paper. Every year, somewhere a fresh grease spot gets gets smeared on his name reminding all — especially those in our military culture — of Lindbergh’s supposed antisemitic transgressions*.

    They could not erase his legend, but Lindbergh has been defrocked for decades. So why would America’s real fifth column (Zion) bother go all out now and produce this HBO miniseries trashing Lindbergh? The reason is to target America First. They want to make the expression and modern America First movement as radioactive as possible. If it were to couple with the 9/11 Truth movement they suspect too many skeletons will fall out of the closet and a divorce is sure to follow.

    p.s. The disappearance of Lindbergh’s plane at the end of the story has two likely explanations. One is that he was struck down by God himself. The other is that, as per the Book of Ester where the name of god is not to be found, Lindbergh was taken out by covert action. Read Mossad done it. And it would not be the first time.

    *Please do learn more about this great man. Here is one rather good treatment.

    • 谢谢: chris
    • 回复: @War and Propaganda
  36. @Digital Samizdat

    So, tell us how Apostolic Succession is teased out of some rather cryptic passages of the Bible, and how such inferences if they exist can justify the Western half of the Great Schism calling itself the Only Church. That requires more than some teasing out, some search for mere plausibility of the popes calling themselves Apostolic when that and not the rock stuff has been made so fundamental to the unique but itself fundamental claim to papal rule.

    Prior to the conflict with the Gnostics there were no monarchic bishops. The first bishoprics were in Asia Minor to steady the Church, meaning the Christians, in that conflict. At the time the Church of Rome was run by a synod of presbyters but Asia Minor had bishops. The word bishop is used in 1 Timothy but the meaning is it seems a little different.

    So it’s unlikely that there was a Bishop of Rome during Peter’s lifetime.

    But anyway, tell us the specifics of how apostolic succession is established by which cryptic Bible passages.

    • 回复: @Digital Samizdat
    , @Emslander
  37. @Pericles

    Yes, chutzpah.

    If, for Jews, Jewish behaviour has nothing to do with anti-Semitism, then it follows that a HBO Jewish fear fantasy special has nothing to do with Jewish fear but only the “obsession” of the one who notices the fear.

    Lot’s comment reminded me of a student of my father’s who in the 70s attempted to defend Playboy magazine ( and his guilty conscience) on the ground that it had some top -notch articles in it. My dad responded that he didn’t see the too-notch articles getting pinned up.

    The porn got pinned up as does the Jewish fear-porn in the governmental form of “Anti-Semitism” czars and their put-you-on-notice prohibitions.

  38. Mia Culpa 说:
    @Lot

    批号:
    Did you watch the movie with the volume turned all the way down?

  39. anonymous[361]• 免责声明 说:
    @Digital Samizdat

    https://www.counter-currents.com/2020/04/charles-lindbergh/
    (with thanks)

    The aviator . . . recalled the only time that he had met Roosevelt, the previous April; he had found that “there was something about him he did not trust. . . like talking to a person wearing a mask.=

  40. Richard B 说:
    @Logical Meme

    Jewish Supremacy Inc. (JSI) wants one thing and one thing only – power.

    They hate, with a deadly savagery, anyone who stands in their way.

    Everything else flows from that and is just so much cheap rationalization and knee-jerk projection.

    But, because psychotic arrogance and self-awareness don’t go together they have no idea how damaging their self-absorption is.

    Right now JSI and destiny itself are like two trash trucks hitting each other at 100 mph. Shit all over the place. I mean, just look around.

    The rest of us either getting run over or serving as witnesses.

    Maybe one day one of those witnesses will write a book about it all and do so using the one thing Phillip Roth and JSI have no interest in – a committment to reality.

    • 同意: Ann Nonny Mouse, Robjil, Z-man
  41. @Amerimutt Golems

    It’s essential that they believe non-Jews hate them and will hurt them sometime. Their little children must be indoctrinated with that notion. Jews must stick together and hate non-Jews because that holds Judaism together. Without that paranoia Judaism would evaporate, there’d be no Jews.

    • 回复: @Jeff Stryker
    , @Colin Wright
  42. This extraordinarily long account does not do much to explain Mao’s revolution. How many Jews are there in China?

    • 回复: @Robjil
    , @Franklin Ryckaert
  43. Dr. Jones:

    Your relentless intellectual tenacity exposing and opposing Jew evil / ZOG tyranny is cherished, Divinely Inspired, and entertaining.

    You shine the spotlight on seemingly more Jew-lies than all other commentators combined, keeping (((them))) constantly in the hot sunlight of disinfecting truth like it’s constantly July as (((they))) constantly Jew-lie.

    There is one key literary Jew-lie which seems to have deceived you as it has the other two most widely known scholars on Jew subversion, Dr. Kevin MacDonald and Dr. David Duke, who, as race realists, have perspectives different from yours.

    Two years later, on June 19, 1920, under the title of “The Jewish Peril,” the Christian Science Monitor referred to an alleged world-wide Jewish conspiracy as demonstrated by the newly discovered, and subsequently discredited, Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

    As has been noted in these three separate comments

    https://www.unz.com/article/the-necessity-of-anti-semitism/#comment-3478645

    https://www.unz.com/mwhitney/weimar-america-here-we-come-virus-hysteria-adds-10-trillion-to-the-national-debt/#comment-3847225

    https://www.unz.com/runz/chinas-rise-americas-fall/#comment-3869087

    “L. Fry” in her invaluable and now hard to find first hand account 水域向东流动 (1933) persuasively in exacting detail refutes the Jew-lie that 议定书 is fiction plagiarized of a prior publication.

    请找到 WFE while copies still exist; the only copy I have ever seen was in tatters held together by rubber bands in the deep stacks of the Wayne University library in Detroit, of all places.

    • 回复: @ANZ
    , @thotmonger
    , @John Thunderer
  44. Hibernian 说:
    @RVBlake

    In Chicago at least, a white neighborhood is often a predominantly Catholic one.

    • 回复: @Alden
  45. Anon[369]• 免责声明 说:
    @Ann Nonny Mouse

    The Bible is the Catholic Church’s book. She alone infallibly determined its canon and she alone has the authority to interpret scripture and define doctrine. Kind of end of story on this.

    • 回复: @Ann Nonny Mouse
    , @Hibernian
  46. Anon[201]• 免责声明 说:

    罗斯福笔下的英雄罗斯福与罗斯福笔下的英雄斯大林一样,在小说发生时也进行了积极的种族清洗。

    这里有一个关于 Bp 的有趣故事。 富尔顿辛会见罗斯福:

    [富尔顿] 辛于 1936 年在白宫会见了富兰克林·D·罗斯福。 他后来形容总统对天主教徒充满敌意,尤其是对辛。 罗斯福说:“在这个国家有一件事是我不能容忍的,那就是像你昨晚在宪法大厅所做的那样发表演讲。” 当希恩问他是什么冒犯了他时,总统读了一篇报纸文章。 立即意识到罗斯福正在阅读华盛顿另一次会议的报道,希恩要求看这篇文章。 总统意识到了自己的错误,把报纸揉成一团,扔进了废纸篓。 “当我说什么时,你必须相信我的话,”他宣称。

    Roosevelt then said,“You think you know a great deal about the Church’s attitude toward communism, don’t you? I want to tell you that I am in touch with a great authority, and he tells me that the Church wants the Communists to win in Spain.”

    辛回答说:“你指的是蒙德莱因枢机主教,我知道蒙德莱恩枢机主教从未发表过你认为是他的言论。”

    罗斯福随后改变了话题,开始攻击巴尔的摩大主教批评西班牙驻美国大使,还攻击当地牧师,据称他告诉教区居民参加抗议总统“支持向共产党派送武器”。西班牙。” 提到神父,罗斯福喊道:“那个人是个骗子。” 他这才意识到自己刚刚谴责巴尔的摩大主教用了同一个词,笑着说:“你知道是怎么回事,我们这些人在公共生活中时不时会变得有点兴奋。”

    托马斯·里夫斯(Thomas C. Reeves) America’s Bishop: The Life and Times of Fulton J. Sheen (旧金山:Encounter Books,2001 年),p。 91:

    • 回复: @Hibernian
    , @Culpepper
  47. 我的问题是,犹太人真的考虑过这一切吗? 如果他们移民到美国,后来又决定不信任基督徒,或者想住在基督徒附近,或者被基督徒统治…… 接下来到底应该发生什么?

    • 回复: @dimples
  48. gay troll 说:

    The gospel of Jesus Christ was designed to turn the messianic Jews into Imperial Roman subjects and idolaters, so I can see why Jews would resent Christianity.

    The holy books of Judaism are also false histories written by propagandists for political and material gain, so I can see why anyone would resent Judaism.

    在这之前 fakakte religious war began, Western civilization thrived under Republican rule. And pagans had no less an understanding of the Almighty than the history hoaxers.

    The U.S. was founded on Deism and neither Christ nor YHWH nor Satan has the slightest bearing on what it means to be an American.

    Fascists and communists go home!

    • 巨魔: Seraphim
    • 回复: @Dumbo
    , @Hibernian
  49. Druid 说:
    @Jake

    Jake, you’re a perpetual fu kh ad!

  50. Wally 说:
    @Logical Meme

    Speaking of “fantasies”, article author Jones said:

    “War provided the cover for the annihilation of large numbers of Jews in Europe.”

    – No it didn’t. There was no “annihilation of large numbers of Jews in Europe”. Period.
    There is certainly no proof for such a claim as has been shown at https://www.unz.com 和其他网站,如 http://www.codoh.com
    Brainwashed Jones just assumes what he cannot prove.

    – The entire matter here is predicated on the fake & utterly impossible “holocaust” narrative.
    Remove that easily debunked Big Lie from the equation and shysters like Philip Roth have nothing but their own bizarre wishful thinking.

    • 同意: Saggy
    • 回复: @Anonymous
  51. @Ann Nonny Mouse

    German-Americans aren’t afraid of Jews. I am one.

    If some Jew called me a Nazi-one or two have-I’d shrug and laugh.

    Its not like the South, where blacks are ferociously upset over slavery. Donald Trump’s father was from Germany. So what?

    Let’s face it, humans are tribal and we fear races which are physically powerful. People fear blacks because many of them physically powerful.

    Even Donald Trump is an example of powerful German genetics. He’s 6’3 and about 250. His Dad initially used him to scare renters into paying up. He’s old now, but you’d have thought twice about tangling with him when he was 25 years old.

    But German-Americans don’t fear Jews because they’re not. Most of them are physically wimps. We keep reading how supposedly intimidating Harvey Weinstein was, but when wiry tough Irish-American Brad Pitt threatened Weinstein he was scared for days. Fundamentally, this is because Irish are tougher than Jews as a tribe.

    Sorry, but if someone who looked like this guy came to an October fest no German-American on earth would be afraid of him.

    • 同意: Emslander
  52. Druid 说:
    @anarchyst

    You’re pretty f’ed up yourself, anarchyst.

    • 巨魔: Twodees Partain
    • 回复: @anarchyst
  53. Wally 说:
    @Jack McArthur

    说过:
    “I had many books written by scholars on the Holocaust published by the university press but none of them explained what this essay covers.”

    – Have any of those liars / “scholars” explained how the laughable & impossible ‘gas chambers’ supposedly worked?
    – Have any of those liars explained why the claimed millions upon millions of alleged human remains in fact do not exist even though it’s claimed that such remains do exist in known locations?

    推荐的:
    “大屠杀”手册,纪录片和视频
    http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?main_page=1奥斯威辛/比克瑙化学:


    视频链接

  54. Seraphim 说:
    @Logical Meme

    During Sarah Silverman’s 2005 stand-up performance “Jesus is Magic,” the comedian joked that the Jews killed Jesus and she would “do it again.”: “I hope the Jews did kill Jesus, I’d f****g do it again in a second!” in front of a laughing and plauding audience. But that’s just ‘jewish humor’.

  55. I imagine the tv series is a different matter, but Roth’s book is actually pretty good.

  56. @Ann Nonny Mouse

    ‘It’s essential that they believe non-Jews hate them and will hurt them sometime. Their little children must be indoctrinated with that notion. Jews must stick together and hate non-Jews because that holds Judaism together. Without that paranoia Judaism would evaporate, there’d be no Jews.’

    He puts it a little less strongly, but ironically, Philip Roth has said much the same thing.

  57. Oracle 说:

    It’s difficult to feel sympathy for ‘fear’ generated by a largely false narrative which they will not let go of because it allows them to enslave and ultimately destroy us.

  58. @Anon

    It’s not anything of the kind. The canonical books of the New Testament were written in Greek by Jewish disciples of Jesus. The Orthodox and Roman Churches have over time had some differences about the canon. Protestants reject that the OT Book of Tobit is canonical. It doesn’t even appear in the King James Authorised Version, translations from Hebrew and Greek published before 1610. Nor any Revised Standard Version. Likewise several other books such as Judith, Wisdom, Maccabees, several others. Not canonical whatever the Pope of Rome thinks.

    Your talk of the Rome sect claiming infallibility on that topic is a nice demonstration of the absurdity of its hegemonic claims.

    End of story? You idiot! You poor baby in that locked Loyola-esque mental box. Poor brainwashed baby, with no hope of escape.

    • 回复: @Anon
  59. The Jewish faith is a failed faith because of the law of status. The Chosenness of a Jew – that a Jew who breaks the Noachide laws still has a higher soul, whilst a Goy who does the same is only ever unclean, implies that regardless of the law of action that Judaism has, within the faith, a murderer can equate themselves to a sage.

    In this equation – given that good religion implies assossiation with the wise – the sage leaves, because they don’t want to be associated with a murderer, on any level.

    So the faith is left with the deluded – who don’t see the contradiction a law of status implies, and who still concentrate on the law of action (the good practicing Jews), and the opportunists – who do see the contradiction, but who see that they can themselves personally benefit from it.

    The opportunists, use the faith to gain power, at the expense of others.

    The deluded faithful, being unwilling to self reflect, fear the external reaction to their failure – their assossiation with the opportunists. They may even claim that the opportunists are not Jews, because they don’t follow the faith’s laws of action – but they miss the point that for the opportunist, it is the law of status that makes them equal, and that the laws of action are moot to their minds.

    Christ split from Judaism because he abandoned the law of status. Christianity, became a kinder faith, because there was no true hiding from the law of action.

    Judaism is now reforming too, but for now the kinder side has yet to challenge the law of status with intellectual honesty. When it does, a new faith along the lines of Christianity (or Mohism, Taoism, Jainism) should emerge.

    But the nugget of the deluded – who take false comfort in the idolatry of the law of status, will likely remain. And the opportunist tumour will doom them into their future, as the cycle plays out again and again, until they again learn that “it is intention, that is called action”.

    I’m impressed the author could read such agitprop, I can’t stomach that many lies flowing through my mind!

  60. @Ann Nonny Mouse

    Well, was any other disciple given the keys to the Kingdom? Traditionally, that’s why he has been considered the ‘Prince of the Apostles’. And it was Peter who established the church in Rome, was it not? I think that would solidify the claim that he was Rome’s first bishop.

  61. mark green 说:
    @wesmouch

    I’ve neither read Roth’s book nor seen the HBO mini-series. After reading this delightfully negative review of ‘The Plot Against America’ in The American Conservative some 15 years ago, you couldn’t pay me to see Roth’s Judiazied fantasy about era in American history where, in fact, malign Jewish influence–not ‘anti-Semitism’–reached toxic critical mass. It’s been downhill ever since.

    https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/heil-to-the-chief/

  62. anonymous[371]• 免责声明 说:

    Are you a white man or are you a Christian ? Jesus’s message wasn’t directed at Slavs, Micks and Dagos. I’m pretty sure his message was originally directed at his fellow Jews for the benefit of them and no one else.

  63. thotmonger 说:
    @Farrakhan.DDuke.AliceWalker.AllAgree

    In lieu of the hard copy, a PDF of WFE remains available. See here:

    http://whale.to/c/WatersFlowingEastward.pdf

    One great irony about the inflated infamy of The Protocols is that it is “antisemitic” when the whole thrust and preponderance of it is an organized and highly sophisticated attack on non-Jews. So who then has a right to be most offended? Who then has a greater obligation to demonstrate to the world it is not true?? It is like finding a diary/manual about how to run a brutal plantation and the news press runs endless stories about what a terrible affront it is on all slave masters. And the slaves have all come to chorus “Yessum. That be no proper respect ta ar Masser.”

    Similarly with the HBO mini series Plot Against America that horribly inverts the truth about Charles Lindbergh. We give this a pass partly because our Founding Fathers cherished freedom of speech. But what is going on? How could such a series simply be for our moral redemption when it so inverts — and perverts — the facts of history and so violently molests the true character of a great man?

    Think Sin City. Who was the nastiest villain of them all in that film? Remember? The Cardinal! Does anyone have a problem if it were remade with a senior rabbi as the most sadistic and vile person in a veritable ocean of vice, violence and corruption? Like, who cares? After all, it is just a cartoon or watcha ma call it graphic novel made into a film for entertainment…

    And to end his long essay with a call for Jews to repent and convert? E, E, E, are you kidding? Boy is that an old egg! I mean while we are waiting for that to hatch, God speed, how about mainstream America rescue our Congress, reclaim our mass media/air waves, and dismantle the Federal Reserve central bank that is blowing it yet again? And high time we prosecute and imprison some of these Israel First war criminals. Netanyahu, Perle, Feith, Wurmser et al. can repent from their Fifth Column in USA, and accept the Lord Jesus any time they want. That would be truly beautiful. But I would be more assured if they did this behind bars with >20 years sentences to chant, and pray, and contemplate how in fact they can be better people, and so learn to look on other people as human beings deserving respect and love..

  64. Emily 说:

    Communism is a jewish construct.
    It was the first plan for jewish domination of the planet in the last hundred or so years..
    They enslaved the Russian people for over 70 years by pure terror and oppression.
    Mass murdering millions of them.
    So when that grand plan collapsed and the Russians regained their freedom and created the first real democracy in their history, they took the chance to economically plunder the country with their paid up ‘patsies’ in the West’s help.
    Plundering the Russian people of trillions in natural assets and profits.
    With their failure of enslavement via communism – we suddenly get the new scheme for domination and the new feudalism.
    全球主义。
    The destruction of the value of ‘labour’ and the tyranny of profit by using foreign serfdom.
    That now is coming unstuck as well – with 1% of the population accrueing unspendable wealth at everyone else’s expense.
    Wealth being used to subvert our democracy and control the organs of propaganda – eg MSM
    确实是1984年。
    So Globalisation is a failure too.
    What next is on the horizion ?
    上帝帮助我们。
    Because the brainwashed, bribed and corrupt won’t.

  65. Jewish paranoid fantasies are responsible for much of the current state of the Western World.

    https://www.takimag.com/article/suicide-final-solution/

    Leftist Jews will tolerate the violence from predatory ghetto rats and Third World immigrants, because such untermenschen are seen as necessary evils in the fight to destroy a greater evil. (…)
    The importation of immigrants from uncivilized nations is an essential element in the destruction of the West. That many of those immigrants are deeply and innately anti-Jewish is something leftist Jews understand and indulge. (…) Leftist Jews are holding out their hands like a scale. In one palm is the well-being of their community. In the other, the war against the white Christian West. Permanent revolution, perpetual war. That’s the hand that wins; the war comes first. There may be a leftist Jew or two who’ll do a Bill Bullitt about-face as the collateral damage continues to mount in Jewish communities. But by and large, Jews will stay the course (…)

  66. jasmin 说:

    More Jewish paranoia. It has long since become just Palin boring. The major influence the Jews had in bring the United Staes into both wars cannot be denied. Now they are trying to bring us into WW III. If Trump falls into this trap being prepared by Sheldon Adelson and Netanyahu the Jews will have the perfect trifecta.

    Charles Linbergh was an authentic American hero. And America first is not some horrifying Jewish paranoid nightmare it is a concept that means just that. And why not? It’s a counter to the Israel first neoconservative agenda.

    • 回复: @marden
  67. dimples 说:
    @Bogus Pogus

    “What in earth is supposed to happen next?”

    That’s a bizarre question. Where have you been hiding? The Christians just do whatever the Jews tell them.

  68. Truth3 说:

    God Bless all Truth Tellers… including…

    菲利普·吉拉尔迪
    亨利·福特
    查尔斯·科夫林神父
    查尔斯·林德伯格
    Huey Long

    • 回复: @Wally
  69. @Pericles

    Circumcision percentages:

    [更多]

    • 谢谢: anarchyst
  70. Justsaying 说:

    Speculation about an impending Jewish inspired revolution in this country may be irrelevant, if obsolete, at this point. How much more Jewish control of our financial, academic, entertainment, and foreign policy institutions should obtain before we realize the revolution has for long been in place and consolidated? What we are now witnessing are the maintenance and expansion phases of that revolution.

  71. Truth3 说:

    Jewish hatred of the rest of Mankind has been the World’s Foremost Problem since before Moses.

    The Jews declared War on Mankind, and have never stopped attacking.

    They attack like any parasite would… drawing out the treasure and eventually killing the host so as not to be ‘found out’.

    It’s time these parasites realize that the inevitable attempt to rid the world of this problem will not be to their pleasure.

    Stop being Jews. This Exodus is needed.

  72. Robjil 说:
    @Saggy

    Jones is afraid of being of accused of being a big 6 “denier”.

    It is a “big” thing in our Zion Macht Frei (ZMF) world.

    Anyone labeled a big 6 denier is relentless labeled this by our ZMF press endlessly like it is the “biggest” sin “ever”.

    This is the reason he carries the Big 6 torch.

    He is afraid of being a Galileo.

    The big 6 is in the sky now as the center of our ZMF universe.

    The world needs many Galileos to bring back the sun as the center of our universe instead of the big 6.

    • 回复: @PTD
  73. Hal Womack 说:

    On the Website of the San Francisco Public Library I published the short comment below at Alpha on Roth’s PLOT. SFPL Director Michael Lambert shamelessly invoked anonymous complaints from an entity called “Bibliocommons” to try to justify graying out my text and tagging it as “offensive”.

    What membership entity –library, school, church etc.– will be the first to establish an online venue wherein all registered members willing to sign their own true names to their remarks will be able to speak freely? Such an initiative will in some fashion restore at least the technical possibility for robust debate which we the NAGIM [Normal, Alias “Gentile”, IMmensity] used to enjoy on the once-noble Usenet newsgroups before JLS*–911 (*=Jewish Lightning Strike). The full sentence introducing a key phrase: Jews HATE free SPEECH for us, the honorable NAGIM.

    ====================================

    ALPHA:
    20年2020月XNUMX日
    Has the reader perhaps noticed that the Jews have taken over America and by far most of the rest of the world, too? Note, for one example from among many, that in GM’14 (Gaza Massacre) Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu murdered >500 children together with some 1.5K of their kith & kin, helpless prisoners all. The U.S. Congress responded to this atrocity by promising the Jew State an extra \$30 billion (at least) and unique ceremonial honors including 28 Standing O’s.

    Philip Roth = one of the top literary poobahs of the dominant kosher cabal, which emphasizes cultural control as well as assassination, bribery and other techniques of tyranny. In reality Bernard Baruch –the second king of the Jews, as I have long dubbed him– shot to death (via agency) democracy in America in September of 1935 in the person of Senator Huey P. Long, the last great white reformer. Twenty-eight years later, the aged Baruch with David Ben Gurion as his XO pulled off the Dallas Jack Whack, that all-time biggest Jew coup d’etat. Competent analysts such as myself finally became aware of the meaning and authorship of the JFK hit only in the backflash of the comparative crudity of JLS–911 managed by KinkHenKi and his XO the late Aerial Shaboom.

    Shall we envision a nighttime woodland love feast with the following parties sitting in a circle around a campfire, taking turns reading out loud from Roth’s perverse screed? Namely: T-RumPus45; Sulzberger the Heirhead; Mike Bloomberg; former kibbutznik Bernie Sanders; Green Jill “New Jew Deal” Stein and second generation _shabbos shiksa_ Nancy Pelosi.

    Follow-up: A group of shadowy cowards of the AIPAC variety, this time abusing the mask of “the BiblioCommons community”, are semi-censoring my review of Roth’s PLOT. Herewith a link to my response, together with a positive proposal. Since with invidious discrimination the cabal are graying out my text, the interested reader will have to cut and paste the link below:
    https://tinyurl.com/r7xk62x
    加利福尼亚州›
    SFPL Nameless Apparatchiki Choke On “Offense”
    1位作者发表了1条帖子
    Mar 4 (9 hours ago) [noted on Thursday 03/05 @ 06:36 hrs PST].

  74. Truth3 说:
    @anarchyst

    Yeah, right, they are just poor innocent little victims.

    长大。

    They love the nasty practice, they do it to their own sons.

    Like the obnoxious asshole Tevya sings in Fiddler… Tradition!

  75. Robjil 说:
    @restless94110

    85-90 percent of foreigners who helped China become Communist were Jews. Even Jews agree this is so. Ironically, Russians say the same percentage made their nation Communist too.

    https://forward.com/schmooze/159051/a-jew-in-maos-china/

    在费城独立电影节上看到纪录片《革命》之前,我错误地认为革命时期的中国是一个没有受到犹太人欢迎的国家。 实际上,共产党收购时帮助中国人的外国人中有85%至90%是犹太人。 其中包括经纪公司高盛(Goldman Sachs)创始人的女儿,她离开了舒适的公园大道住宅,为中国人提供帮助。

    • 回复: @Hal Womack
  76. @the_old_one

    Does Jones believe that such an absurd marriage would be according to the norms of the 徽标?

  77. @restless94110

    Communism was brought to China by “Russian” agents. Most of those “Russians” were Jews. Mao had Jewish advisors.

    • 回复: @ivan
  78. G J T 说:

    Yet in spite of the animosity there were no pogroms in America. Roth fails to see that “it didn’t happen here” because the communists never came to power in America. If they had, there might have been a bloody reaction here, just as Lindbergh predicted

    A little late, to be sure, but they still may just get their wish. And we may get ours as well…

  79. G J T 说:
    @Hamlet's Ghost

    The truth about anti-Semitism is that Jews need it. They need to be hated and thus in their sociopathic minds justify their own hatred in revenge

    Exactly. Everything the Jew does is ultimately an exercise in self-fulfilling prophecy.

  80. 450.org 说:

    Again, we’re back in the Jewish version of Through the Looking Glass. If Roth’s point is that Jews who collaborate with revolutionary regimes do so at their own peril, it is a point worth making.

    I agree. Look at Israel’s embrace of, and support for, Donald Trump who also includes white nationalists under his umbrella. What a match made in heaven. Maybe it always was. Trump so loves Israel, he has called Jews “killers,” and he has proclaimed himself King of the Jews. And they eat it up and swoon over him. Donald Trump may well end up being their nadir when it’s all said and done. How long can a moth dance around a flame before the inevitable happens?

  81. To paraphrase GTA’s Michael De Santa: “You miss a thousand shows every day, pal. Make sure this is one of them.”

  82. @anarchyst

    说得通。
    Muslims in Europe show the simlilar sick traits compared to normal humans.
    And from a global perspective, mutilated Americans look at least like the most cowardish examples of Caucasians.

  83. @the_old_one

    Why do simpletons like you always have to make up that ridiculous strawman?

  84. Z-man 说:

    Man what a long winded article, I only read the first few paragraphs. Me and my cohorts put it briefly and so concise back in March. (Grin)

    Z-man says:
    17年2020月4日,格林尼治标准时间上午36:XNUMX
    Hollywood is aiding and abetting in this farce. There’s a Nazi hunting series with Al Pacino and another one smearing Lindbergh. I think they’re both on HBO. They should both be flops.
    • Replies: @Seneca44, @John Regan, @Epaminondas, @Johann, @the grand wazoo, @Wally

  85. gotmituns 说:

    My wife was hospitalized a few months ago for a week and when I’d go to see here each day, I saw what was on TV and I thanked the Lord for giving me the wisdom to get the dumb thing out of my house years ago. Basically, the TV was what “cured” my wife. The other woman in the room refused to shut her TV off and my wife had no option but to get better in order to get away from the dumb thing.

    • 同意: SOL
    • 回复: @Anonymous
  86. My objection to the Roth 施洛克 is that Roth – and, indirectly, HBO – have exploited a true American hero in order to sell fictional muck and engage in muck-raking for money.
    Lindbergh was a true American Firster – unlike the current occupier of the White House, who is merely a Trump Firster.
    Though he had personal differences with President F. D. Roosevelt, Lindbergh eventually flew some 50 combat missions in the Pacific during the war against Japan.
    To see a cheap novelist like Roth and a mercenary outfit like HBO trashing Lindbergh’s name is an absolute disgrace. They should both be thoroughly ashamed of themselves.

    • 同意: flyingtiger
  87. @Jake

    Another thing that Mr. Jones fails to address when mentioning Henry Ford is Ford’s seminal contribution to the industrialization of the USSR in the nineteen twenties.

  88. Anonymous[118]• 免责声明 说:
    @Wally

    Right. The author’s comment also strikes me as an endorsement of the grotesque exaggerations of the Holocaust, thereby subtly exonerating generalized Jewish identitarian hatred of Christians before launching into polemic against Roth and several others for their demonic antiChristian hatred. In other words, yes, Roth and so many Jews are haters, but the basis of their hatred is explainable since war was merely the Christian “cover” for allowing supposed “Jewish annihilation.”

    I hope the author didn’t intend this since the unspeakable evil in need of remembrance is defiling the memory of the Americans who died by the hundreds of thousands in part to save European Jewry from supposed threats of annihilation that never materialized nor, apparently, were ever planned. As to the reality that doubles the Jewish insult to America and Europe, in 破咒 Dr Nicholas Kollerstrom footnotes (p. 48) a quip from Rense that goes,

    In all of German-occupied Europe, there were 2.4 million Jews. After the war, 3.8 million Jews applied for Holocaust reparations. Tragically, the remaining 6 million were lost.

    And as to who runs America, there’s hardly better proof than Roth’s being awarded the National Humanities Award by Obama for Roth’s sole contribution to literature, which considering he couldn’t string two interesting paragraphs together, came down to paranoid musings on Jewish identitarian hatred of America’s Christian underclass.

  89. Wally 说:
    @Truth3

    True enough, but lets’ not forget those who have paid a heavy price for their advocacy of free speech on the impossible “holocaust”:

    Official list of Revisionist, “holocaust” Debunking Scholars persecuted / imprisoned for questioning the “Holocaust”:
    https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=12642

  90. Anon[299]• 免责声明 说:

    Suspecting an inevitable majority uprising against your group in every nation in which it resides seems like it would cause a rational repatriation to their own single nation. The incentives must be pretty good to continue to do otherwise. Risk and Reward.

    Yet, they will kvetch about realizing a risk penalty no matter what damage they need to do to others to realize the reward.

    Imagine a world in which Israeli and Jewish nationalists were branded plotters against Israel for their nationalism, by a minority group who controlled Israeli film and media.

    Imagine that same minority group ceaselessly worked to dispossess the Jews of their nation.

    If America isn’t a enough of a parallel, this parallel is also found for Europe.

  91. Dumbo 说:
    @gay troll

    Wrong, the U.S. was funded by Freemasons. It was likely a NWO project from the start. Novus ordo seclorum is written on the dollar note for a reason.

    • 回复: @gay troll
    , @Seraphim
  92. Hibernian 说:
    @Anon

    A proposition of Faith. Not an occasion for triumphalism. Similarly the other side should realize that it, for all practical purposes, holds to a doctrine of Luther’s/Calvin’s/King James’ translators’ infallibility that is a propositon of Faith which others do not share.

    • 回复: @RSDB
  93. Anon[369]• 免责声明 说:
    @Ann Nonny Mouse

    Look, I can say, as member of Christ’s True Church, we don’t love the Bible any less than Protestant heretics, after all, it is 在水底采捕业协会(UHA)的领导下, book. Protestant heretics, for doctrinal reasons, ripped out the Deuterocanonical books from the true canon. Heretical Catholic monk Martin “sin boldly” Luther wanted James ripped out because “faith without works is dead” was too abhorrent to him.

    The Orthodox and Roman Churches have over time had some differences

    Whatever, Ss. Peter and Paul went to Rome, not Constantinople.

    • 回复: @Jake
  94. Hibernian 说:
    @Anon

    Eleanor considered him too pro-Catholic. Of course, he had at least one Catholic secretary who was possibly a side girlfriend.

  95. Hibernian 说:
    @gay troll

    A few of the Founding Fathers were Deists. Generally they were Christian.

  96. @Jake

    Yes. Jones is in direct intellectual descent from the idea of St Augustine, City of God.

    Jones does know that the founding fathers of America were judaised protestants

  97. Mefobils 说:
    @Pheasant

    To answer for Ngorogoro Guzugu Bubba Obwandiyag (where did he get such a stupid name) why not just call himself Zulu Dog or Ghetto Hoe ? Anyway I digress, just one, Alice in Wonderland

  98. @anarchyst

    Wrong. The Orthodox Rabbis in New Yawk do just that

    • 回复: @anarchyst
  99. Emslander 说:
    @Jack McArthur

    Satan always takes his campaigns too far. He/She has a fundamentally incorrect understanding of human nature, which is why he/she couldn’t foresee that the Crucifixion would necessarily result in the Ressurrection and that martyring Christians wouldn’t result in the eradication of the Faith, but in its unstoppable growth.

    I think we’re in the throes of one of those great Satanic miscalculations right now. I don’t know why it appears that American Jews have chosen once again to take the lead in it, but they have. I’d leave the psychological explanations to Roth for this particularly self-destructive bent, but it appears repeatedly.

    • 同意: Fox
  100. @RVBlake

    Hmm. You could read his book which is suffused with sources, including direct quotes from the guilty parties.

    OR, you could just go on ignorantly belching your racial gas

  101. Emslander 说:
    @Ann Nonny Mouse

    Peter’s tomb is in the Vatican. History and fact support the Catholic Church.

    • 回复: @Ann Nonny Mouse
  102. @Hamlet's Ghost

    ”he worked tirelessly to destroy the foundations of the society that naively admitted him and his ilk.“

    Or, as Jewish Groucho said, “I refuse to join any club that would have me as a member.”

  103. anarchyst 说:
    @Mick Jagger gathers no mosque

    You are correct. Thanks for the clarification.

  104. Anonymous[661]• 免责声明 说:

    Jones seems guaranteed to write a cogent and incisive analysis on any subject that interests him. Glad to see his work appearing on Unz, would love to see more.

  105. Sean 说:

    Tsarist Russia was no friend of the Jews who did not have anything to do with Germany fighting Russia in WW1. Everything flowed from the Tsar’s decision for war, and that was predicated on the bank cheque from France, which had an unofficial alliance with the UK (begining when the 1905 revolution on top of the loss to Japan knocked Russia out the balance of power). Serbian state terrorists deliberately engineered a war to increase their country’s territory and Serbia 做了 double in size. Raymond Poincaré had laid the groundwork for a grand alliance to get France’s lost provinces (where he was born) back, and they returned to France. Hitler was a phenomenon of Germany losing WW1 because of failure to attack Russia in 1905 when it was helpless and Britain had a tiny army.

    The Jews Hitler hated were American Jews because the American capitalist system had supplied Britain everything it needed to keep fighting, and then formally entered the war, harnessed German American emigrant blood (which private first class Hitler saw first hand in American POWs) and sent it to Europe where they–with a little help from the 1918-19 influenza epidemic–prevented Germany winning WW1. The Flu wasn’t finished yet

    相比 to the exhausted and embittered British and French, the United States (and Wilson himself) thus emerged as the key player in early 1919, the one party capable of forging a durable peace. But on April 3, 1919, Wilson fell ill with flu-like symptoms. Recognizing that “the whole of civilization seemed to be in the balance,” his physician downplayed the sickness and ordered bed rest. Ever since, historians have wondered about this episode, both concerning Wilson’s prior health problems and his performance when he returned to the negotiating table a week later. Wilson wasn’t the same man. He tired easily and quickly lost focus and patience. He seemed paranoid, worried about being spied upon by housemaids. He achieved some of his specific goals but was unable or unwilling to articulate a broader vision for a better world.

    Contrary to the 14 points stipulated by Wilson that were instrumental on the Germans capitulating, in the aftermath of WW1 Germany was hit with a huge reparations bill. Hitler already hated the Jews as the central galion of Anglo America’s capitalist system that had defeated Germany, but after the post hostilities blockade that killed 800,000 German children, reparations-induced 1923 hyperinflation and the 1933 depression his complaint that American Jews were turning German’s into “white slaves” and colonising them with American capital struck a cord in Germany. Obviously the Jews were behind that were not Bolsheviks, but rather NYC capitalists. The first thing the Nazi’s did when the came to power was close down the port facilities where emigrants embarked. In the darkest days towards the end of WW2 Hitler was still going on about German-American engineers building the planes that were bombing German cities and factories, and taking about 50% on Germany’s resources to combat.

    Hitler was a German nationalist who like many Germans was enthralled by stories of the Wild West and became even more envious of it after seeing the best German (for emigrants are necessarily the most valuable to their homeland) blood in American uniform during WW2. He wanted to make Germany into the”American Union”, but without the Jewish capitalists . First order of business for Hitler was conquering his ‘Wild East’ and killing off the natives, just like Amerika had done, but to keep the British occupied in the Middle East He sent Rommel of with rather too many air assets, better to have given him some pointers about hygiene on tropical countries (which the British had been taught long ago) because at El Alamein 40% of the Germans had dysentery.

    Although his Indians (he actually referred to the Soviets as “Indians”) were militarily quite formidable Hitler would have succeeded had he followed the plan but as with the campaign in France where he was preoccupied with capturing Belgian territory, he began to treat Barbaross as having Balto Ukrainian objectives; in August 1940 Hitler allowed himself to be diverted from the concentrated drive on Moscow that all his military experts wanted. Nevertheless, America gave the USSR getting on for half a million trucks, and how many 88mm guns would Stalin’s tanks have had to face if the lion’s share of those dual purpose guns were not defending the Reich from Allied bombing? Yes Virginia, it was American Jews that Hitler saw as Germany’s greatest enemy, and he was not wrong.

    • 同意: ThreeCranes
    • 回复: @Fuerchtegott
  106. Never say never because anything is possible … isn’t the whole country in lockdown?

  107. Alden 说:

    Every streaming service alternates between blacks gays, trannies Jews Nazis and plenty of porn, mostly male dorsal. Maybe all the Jewish men who make movies are gay. The latest Medici series features a major gay character and his lovers backsides and coy flashes of frontal.

  108. Alden 说:
    @Hibernian

    Catholic and private schools are the only reasons most northern cities aren’t 80 percent black.

  109. gay troll 说:
    @Dumbo

    The U.S. was founded on the writings of Thomas Paine, who was against revealed religion and was not a Freemason. He wrote the Declaration of Independence. It is his faith in God that is truly American; not the Jewish, Christian, or Mystery God, but the God that is self evident and illuminated by Reason.

    Of course other founding fathers were involved in Freemasonry. But Paine is the spirit of 1776, and his God had no need for revelation.

  110. Alden 说:
    @Ann Nonny Mouse

    The Passover Seder, the night Jesus was arrested. First drink of my blood and eat of my flesh*, the first catholic communion service. That was the transition from Judaism to Catholicism; from an ethnic religion to a universal ( Catholic in Greek) religion, from a Jewish Passover Seder to the Catholic religious service.

    “Thou art Peter and upon thou the rock I shall build my church” St Peter the first Pope. Then Jesus kisses all his apostles and thus created them bishops of the Catholic Church. They ordained priests, some of whom rose to become bishops, who ordained more priests for the next 2,000 years. Direct line back to that 33 AD Seder.

    Go wallow in the sadistic pornographic genocidal Jewish Protestant Old Testament. American Catholics will continue running 70 percent of American hospitals and medical systems and a huge network of alternative catholic schools which are the only refuge from the Protestant founded public schools where White kids are routinely beaten bullied robbed and harassed by the black Protestant animals.

    Plus, we have the greatest museums, libraries art buildings hospitals music and astronomy observatory in the world.

    What have Protestants got? Public schools preaching sex at 12 abortion gay trannies and hatred of Whites, no hospitals, and you pigs destroyed some of the great art of European civilization during your reformation.

    The reformation was a Jewish plot against Christianity from the start. It was Netherlands and German jews. And you prods fell for it and destroyed art beauty and libraries

    The Protestant World Council of Churches was a Soviet front from the start. The one true Roman Catholic Church refused to join. Liberals communists Protestants and Jews denounced the one true Roman Catholic Church for not joining that communist front group.

    American Protestants, especially in the Bible Belt south couldn’t even protect their children from the horrors of school desegregation and busing . Catholics could and do protect their children from the horrors of the Protestant founded public school system.

    There’s an old French saying applicable to the Catholic Protestant divide. “ Don’t listen to what they say, look at what they do.” Protestants talk and have talked themselves into 18,000 sects. Catholics do; schools hospitals art music architecture civil and structural engineering beauty and the calendar we use every day.

    Protestants just talk about the pornographic sadistic genocidal Jewish part of the Bible.

    I’m not a catholic and don’t believe in God or any religious fairy tales. But I’m a cynic and a realist. I’m an empiricist or realist or something. I look at results and reality. I look at what black criminals do. I did not listen to
    liberals exonerating them for their crimes. I look at what Catholics have done for the last 2,000 years and especially, especially what their private schools are doing to protect White American children from black savages and being told to start having sex at age 12 and attending you might be gay classes.

    Don’t listen to what they say, look at what they do.

  111. Hal Womack 说:
    @Robjil

    The Jew presence in Russia a century ago was by far heavier than in China. In the Polish Pale, the Russian Empire had the largest concentration of Jews in the world, whereas in China the Han population was overwhelming and the various national minorities were also “NAG” or Normal, Alias “Gentile”. One of the main blows in Mao Zedong’s rise to power in the revolutionary movement in the 1920’s and ’30’s was his shoving aside from leadership the several advisors sent from Moscow.

    For this reason the Chinese “Communist” revolution, like its Vietnamese counterpart under Ho Chi Minh, genuinely served the national interest.

    • 同意: Robjil
  112. L Bean 说:

    The new season of Showtime’s “Penny Dreadful” takes place in pre-WWII Los Angeles, which is inexplicably stocked with secret and not-so-secret nazis, at all levels. The main supernatural/evil character is of course in direct control of these secret nazis(who occasionally, again inexplicably, don their flair and hold Bund meetings to ensnare the hapless goy who is just jazzed to learn all about the real origins of teh frankfurter). So, with HBOs show we have Bund Beer Garden shit, and now running right alongside incase you missed it, Showtime also has a nightmarish Bund tableau. It is all so ludicrous. But nazis are great characters, it writes itself. I wouldn’t be surprised if all of these storylines were ACTUALLY computer generated these days. There’s no there there, except the nazi. The nazi is always always there, just around the corner, married to your wife’s friend, in local government, or even YOUR BOSS.

    And I’m only on episode one. Showtime has always been like this though, at least for the past 10+ years. But you can see how they coordinate these messages, across the networks. You know, in case someone has an HBO subscription but not a Showtime one and vice versa.

    A similar thing happened wrt Russiagate, and this was all finely planned several years before the recent feverpitch version of it. FX’s “The Americans” (highest rated US show while it ran) was literally written by the CIA to prep the mind for the inhumanity that is The Russian. The premise is that Russians are so evil they sell their own children into the spy game, and then these children settle in the US to undermine it, while part of their cover is to have children of their own, and normal “American” lives. “See, proof that Russians are inhuman! Giving their own children to their evil cause” -some CIA asshole whose only job after being in the CIA was to write the highest rated Russophobic show in history.

    Some of you may remember the odious Masha Gessen. She was the show’s go-to subtitle translater/speech expert.

    Immediately preceding “The Americans”, FX gave us “The Strain”, a vampire series. And you guessed it – the head vampire is a NAZI. So we get these flashbacks to concentration camp scenes, where the evil camp guard is not only a NAZI, but he also literally eats Jews alive.

    But The Plot Against America is something I never thought I’d see committed to film. They’ve used up all of their other horror memes and we are back at square one of pure Ziotard-fantasy. But mostly it’s just more spitting on the goy, in case anyone from the younger generations gets the idea that true antiwar types like Lindbergh might have had a point, after all. The generation who knows he did, they are gone. I’ve seen more comments than I can count in praise of this show, from the younger generation. They love this fantasy shit. The more implausible and dire, the better.

    • 谢谢: schnellandine
    • 回复: @S
  113. Without a doubt , one of the most hateful, self glorifying, piece of trash imaginable, with a combination of known facts, and imagined ” what it could have been” , to confuse the typical ignorant human , to a point that he or she has no knowledge of what really happened.
    Incredible that this is not treated as a fantasy, instead it’s presented as a factual historical story.

    To say of what is that it is not, or of what is not that it is, is false, while to say of what is that it is, and of what is not that it is not, is true.
    - 亚里士多德

  114. gay troll 说:
    @Alden

    For an atheist you sure are a diehard defender of Papistry. I guess you like the racism, sexism, and homophobia but actual divinity escapes you?

    Protestants destroyed the great art of European civilization? Have you forgotten that Jews and their bastard offspring the Christians base their religious culture on iconoclasm and intolerance? Christian art sprung out of the ruin of the dark ages, like saplings after a forest fire. It is the fake news of Jesus Christ that burns art and history to the ground in its quest for authenticity.

    You say you don’t believe in any religious fairy tales but you discuss the Gospel as if it were a historical record? How ignorant or devious are you?

    • 巨魔: Seraphim, Twodees Partain
    • 回复: @Anon
    , @Alden
    , @Anon
  115. Curmudgeon 说:
    @Digital Samizdat

    Good points all, and a couple more.
    Hitler intervened to help his old commander, a Jew, Ernst Hess. He put his mother’s doctor’ Eduard Bloch, to whom he referred as a noble Jew, under the protection of the Gestapo, and reportedly said that if all Jews were like Bloch, there would be no Jewish question.

    The official Krystallnacht narrative was debunked almost 40 years ago by Ingrid Weckert in her book 费尔策伊琴 later translated into English as 闪点. Jewish author Mark Rigg wrote 希特勒的犹太士兵 documenting about 150,000 soldiers, including officers up to the rank of Field Marshall, as being of Jewish descent.

    There was an enormous amount of debate within the party over who was a Jew. It seemed to boil down to: were you a German who happened to be a Jew by religion, or a Jew who happened to be living in Germany?

    • 回复: @Wally
  116. Curmudgeon 说:
    @Observator

    Thanks for the link. I don’t know (yet) if it is covered in Tedor’s piece, but the promise to rebuild the military was accelerated when Germany, which had met its disarmament obligations under Versailles complained at the League of Nations, that the other signatories to Versailles had not even begun to disarm. There were a number of German proposals to reduce further. The UK and France basically told Germany to piss off. That is what triggered the rebuilding in earnest.

    • 回复: @Steve Naidamast
  117. Roth gives the impression that anyone who linked Jews and Communism was a raving Nazi anti-Semite,

    I never get the impression from reading to Hitler’s writings and listening to his speeches that the Nazis were “raving” anti-Semites. Rather, they were just normal anti-Semites, quite level-headed. Mein Kampf is fairly tepid on Jewry and it reads as though Hitler has got bigger fish to fry and other preoccupations.

    • 回复: @Grahamsno(G64)
  118. Ray P 说:
    @Logical Meme

    “大卫 恐慌h”. Seriously?

  119. Alden 说:
    @RVBlake

    I never heard of it but it makes sense in these ways.

    Most of the big northern cities had lots of Catholics from 1800 and 48er Germans through endless Irish from 1630 on, especially the 1840 50s famine Irish through 1880 Italians and E Europeans.

    Catholics established their separate grade school system. And coalesced around the parish schools and numerous catholic social political clubs Knights of Columbus , children and teen activities church dances women’s clubs labor unions professional associations employment networks etc etc.

    WW 2 came along and negroes were brought north and west to replace the White men sent off to the military. Blacks are one of the major Protestant ethnic groups. In the west They were sent to Oakland, San Francisco Richmond Ca Los Angeles Long Beach San Pedro and even San Jose Seattle Portland Or where they commenced their work of destroying the cities. San Francisco was the only Catholic city in the west.

    But the Midwest and east coast northern cities were very Catholic.

    If, and only if ; it was a Catholic vs Protestant fight then sending criminal rapacious black Protestants to White Catholic neighborhoods did destroy those neighborhoods.

    But the WW2 black migration destroyed Protestant, Jewish and catholic neighborhoods of all economic social religious and ethnic groups, not just Catholics.

    After the war first black criminals and feral black youts took over White politicians catered to them and Whites fled the black cities as Central Asian tribes fled from Attila the Hun.

    The thing is, blacks are mostly Protestants and most Catholics are White.

    The black Protestant invasion was wasn’t anti catholic. It was just practical. Maybe if we hadn’t passed the 1925 anti immigration laws we would have had a sufficient supply of European men to man both the military and war industry.

    We all know how and why the cities were destroyed by the WW2 migration. It’s not worth thinking about 80 years later. All we can do now is save ourselves if we can.

    • 回复: @utu
  120. Curmudgeon 说:
    @SolontoCroesus

    I can’t speak for others, but growing up in the late 50s/early 50s “neighborhood” and “community” used to be interchangeable. Both were geographic locations, usually with an ethnic predominance. The reference to them being racial or religious is a more recent phenomenon, other than “Chinatown”. Of course, people understood that people wanted to be with “their own”, and part of that was religion. The “German” neighborhood in my city had both Catholics and Protestants.

  121. More Jew agitprop pushing the Jews’ favorite canard, the Jews as the perennial victims.

    the Jews won’t mention the that the Jews were the very first nation to declare war, 1933, in what became the Second Zionist World War or that the Nazis were their partners in Crime, the Haavara Agreement.

    Jews are a virus. A Jew is an infection.

    • 同意: anarchyst
  122. Anon[145]• 免责声明 说:
    @gay troll

    For an atheist you sure are a diehard defender of Papistry. I guess you like the racism, sexism, and homophobia but actual divinity escapes you?

    Alden’s views on religion and culture (not his racialist views!) are a lot like those English atheist historian and writer Tom Holland. Intellectuals like Nassim Taleb are big fans of Tom Holland’s work. Holland, educated at Oxford and Cambridge, credits Christianity— the Catholic Church— with all that is good in Western civilization. Holland has produced historical programs for the BBC and Channel 4 which are downright “papist”. Conversely he produced a program for the BBC on Islam which was critical of Islam and for which he received a slew of death threats.

    • 谢谢: gay troll
    • 回复: @ivan
  123. @Alden

    The Passover Seder, the night Jesus was arrested.

    The Seder (order) did not exist then and was invented after A.D. 70 even though Scott Hahn claimsth last supper was a seder.

    The notes in Catena Aurea and the teachings of the council of Trent both show tt was no seder.

    The Seder (see jewish encyclopedia) has to be eaten standing and includes both men and women.

    It was all all male Last Supper/First Mass

    • 回复: @Seraphim
  124. Anon[318]• 免责声明 说:

    In the West outside of Israel, ethnonationalists are the “Far Right” and badpeople. Legislation is made to defend against their social and political interests.

    This is mandated by institutional Judaism.

    In Israel and in Judaism, ethnonationalists are normative goodJews. Anyone who isn’t is a “self hating Jew”. Legislation is made to protect their social and political interests.

    This is mandated by institutional Judaism.

    Who controls the West as a foreign usurping group is not up for debate.

    • 同意: mark green, tomo
  125. Alden 说:
    @gay troll

    I’m not an atheist, I just don’t believe in God or the fairy tales. I don’t care enough about it to be an atheist. As for the gospel, that’s what it says. Jesus said this and that. I don’t like atheism because it’s an anti Christian anti European people’s movement.

    I’m also a historian. I look at what the Catholic Church did, such as the calendar we use and the worlds greatest museums and libraries. I look at what Protestants did, nada nothing but return to the Jewish part of the Bible and Jewish style dog eat dog capitalism justified by some crazy doctrine that only 144,000 souls will go to heaven
    I have no interest in listening to some ridiculous debate based on a genocidal pornographic homicidal book of Jewish fairy tales, beloved by Protestants

    I LOOK at what American Catholics have done, 70 percent of American health care and hospitals and a separate private school system where White children of all religions are protected from Common Core and black savages.

    I’m a cynic and realist. I stick to the old French Standard. look at what is done, don’t listen to what is said.
    Catholics do good things. Protestants talk about the Jewish Bible.
    Send your kids to an integregated public school where they will be bombarded by anti White propaganda from kindergarten on. Send your kids to public school whereblack Protestant animals will bully beat rob and abuse them

  126. A seder has both men and women participating.

    The Last Supper/First Mass had only men in attendance – The Apostles. What happened in that upper room was not a seder, although it has been popularly described as such.

    [更多]

    Seder, is nowhere to be found in the Gospels. Rather, renowned Jewish Scholars, like, Baruch Bosker (“Origins of the Seder”) observe that the Seder (Order) traditions (according to Rabbinical literature) bring us only back as far as 70 A.D. the time after the destruction of Jerusalem and there is no evidence in Rabbinical literature of a Seder prior to that.

    As for Christian Catholics, that claim runs afoul of Sacred Tradition as, to just cite a few sources, the exegesis complied about the Institution of the Eucharist in, Catena Aurea, teaches us; “But how is our Lord said to sit down, whereas the Jews eat the Passover standing?”

    But even more conclusive is this; “Council of Trent (Sess. 22, c. 1): “After Christ had celebrated the ancient Passover, which the multitude of the sons of Israel sacrificed in memory of their going out of Egypt, He instituted a new Passover, that He Himself should be immolated by the Church (ab ecclesia), by means of (per) the priests, under (sub) visible signs, in memory of His passage from this world to the Father, when He redeemed us by the shedding of His Blood, and delivered us from the power of darkness, and translated us to His Kingdom.”

    Here is the exegesis of Cornelius a Lapide:

    And supper being over, when Satan had put it into the heart of Judas, the son of Simon the Iscariot, to betray Him. After the legal supper and the common supper too, before the Sacred Supper—the institution of the Eucharist—Christ washed the feet of His disciples; for by this washing He wished to show with how great purity and humility we ought to approach the Eucharist. Observe that Christ partook of a triple supper with His disciples, the ceremonial, the ordinary supper, and the Supper of the Eucharist. In families of ample means, the lamb being insufficient to satisfy the hunger of so many persons, there usually followed the ordinary supper, at which they ate other kinds of meat. And so Christ washed the feet of the Apostles after the two former suppers and before the third. And hence it is clear this washing of feet was not merely the ordinary usage of the Jews according to which they were accustomed to wash the feet of their guests, but a sacramental ablution, by which Christ was preparing His disciples for the reception of the Eucharist, converting the ordinary usage into a sacred ceremony. So that they are in error who gather from this passage that Christ washed the feet of His disciples after the Eucharistic Supper and before the lengthy discourse which He then made them, and which is subjoined by John. Of this number is S. Cyprian, or whoever is the author of the “Treatise on the Washing of Feet.” “The Lord,” he says, “had now distributed to the Apostles the Sacrament of His Body; Judas had now gone out; when, rising from the table, He girt Himself with a towel, and at the knees of Peter the Lord Himself, on bended knee, about to wash the feet of His servant, discharged towards him an office of consummate humility.”

  127. Anon[318]• 免责声明 说:
    @gay troll

    It is up for debate as to whether your ignorance of history , theology, or sociopolitics better condemns you as worthless.

    • 同意: Alden
  128. manc 说:

    I watched this miniseries because I’m a sucker for alternative history novels and adaptations (Fatherland by Robert Harris and SS/GB by Len Deighton are the two best).

    After a while The Plot Against America was just some dude scaring the hell out of his family at dinner and freaking out listening to Walter Winchell.

  129. Wally 说:
    @anarchyst

    变态的犹太教教士进行礼节/包皮环切术:

  130. Wally 说:
    @Curmudgeon

    Here you go, Kristallnacht debunked:

    Crystal Night’ 1938: The Great Anti-German Spectacle, By Ingrid Weckert: https://codoh.com/library/document/2130/

    Deconstructing the Kristallnacht Myth: http://nationalvanguard.org/2016/09/deconstructing-the-kristallnacht-myth/

    Kristallnacht..greatest false flag ever?: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=6190

    • 谢谢: Curmudgeon
  131. @Digital Samizdat

    Just two choices. Live as under-mensch or liberate yourself.

    • 同意: tomo
  132. Anon[146]• 免责声明 说:
    @anarchyst

    Yes, “male genital mutilation” is commonplace in the USA due to promotion by the “health community” as a hygiene issue, which is totally dishonest.

    Modern widespread infant-involuntary genital mutilation stemming from a bronze age human sacrifice cult will serve to historically damn the modern world above much else (virtually all Jewish holidays are about murdering outsiders, and their animal sacrifices are symbolic stand-ins for human sacrifice of their enemies – which is why Christ, as the sacrcificial Jewish victim / lamb that rises from the dead is so hated by Jews).

    Circumsicion has deep cultic significance that generally only the Rabbis have knowledge of. Its true meaning reveals it as a ritual that is only suitable for Jews. The ritual has fully bled into gentile culture and none of them have any idea what the actual symbolism means when they have their infant’s foreskin removed. If they knew, they wouldn’t do it (as if there needed to be a ‘good’ symbolic reason not to do mutilate the genitals of children).

    • 回复: @tomo
  133. @Curmudgeon

    I think that is what caused Adolf Hitler to remove The Third Reich from the League of Nations…

    • 同意: Curmudgeon
  134. gay troll 说:
    @Alden

    You really lose me with the ad hominem racism. I grew up in integrated liberal public school systems and I live in California. I have seen plenty of blackness first hand and I have witnessed its intelligence and empathy. Even if there are racial differences that manifest in behavior or intelligence, this is no reason to denigrate the divine soul within every human being or to deny them their God given rights. Catholicism is just as supremacist as Judaism, and despite the pretty philosophies of Jesus, the Roman church has long carried itself like the Jews, leaving a trail of human blood in its wake, armed with the justification of being God’s elect. Even Christ himself taught that we are to love ALL men and women as we love our kin and neighbors. Yet people like you defend a vision of Christendom that is racist. It is the Protestants who put greater faith in the teachings of Jesus, and the Catholics who defend the chauvinism of the Old Testament.

    • 回复: @Alden
  135. anarchyst 说:
    @Alden

    I must impart my Catholic school experiences…
    Initially, I attended an excellent, all-white Catholic school, the atmosphere that was geared to whites and was totally conducive to learning. A pleasant atmosphere was a constant; troublemakers were dealt with, sanctioned and expelled as needed. This school also warned us about nefarious practices of the “tribe”, as well.
    快进四年级……由于家庭经济困难等,我“被迫”去了另一所((天主教))学校。
    我以前的天主教学校和我的“新”学校之间的差异就像白天和黑夜。
    This “Catholic” school catered to the “orcs”. The teachers (nuns) and priests were part of the “new social movement”, the “civil-rights (for some)” movement being the highlight of the day. Learning was secondary to pushing the “civil-rights (for some)” and the fledgling “social justice” movement that was just getting started.
    The curriculum was “watered down” as well, in deference to its increasing “orc” student population. It seemed that everything was centered around their “success”, although us white students were capable of much more. Among us whites, our academic potential was “stunted” by the mindless, endless misbehavior and tomfoolery by the “orcs”, who were always causing disruptions to those of us whites who were accustomed to “real” learning.
    I probably would have been better off going to a local “public school”, despite “public schools” being infected with “orc” mentality as well.
    天主教会“学校系统”如今如此“笨拙”,以至于他们将向非天主教少数民族提供免学费的“奖学金”,同时拒绝向(应该超过)有资格获得奖学金或减免学费的贫穷天主教白人提供天主教教育.

    • 回复: @Alden
    , @Alden
  136. ricpic 说:

    E. Michael Jones and Unzites hate and fear Jews as much as Roth hated and feared goyim.

    锅遇水壶。

    • 回复: @Anon
  137. tomo 说:
    @Anon

    As a foreigner in the US I often wondered why they do it (apart from doctors promoting it and trying to trick mothers into approving it because these doctors make a few thousand USD in a few minutes – there was an article about this fraud in Mens Health mag years ago) .An American friend told me when she was giving birth – although she explicitly said she does not want her baby circumcised, the predatory US doctor still tried to trick her to approve while she was drugged out and confused right after the delivery
    I’ve come to a conclusion it’s done as a part of a comprehensive child abuse to turn children basically into cultish slaves.
    The lesson is meant to teach the victims that obviously they don’t even have any control over their own bodies. So shut up and obey the master slave.
    And to make them never forget that they are ‘different’
    However you look at it it’s child abuse (but so is most religion).
    I read somewhere that it was Kellogg – the owner of the cereal company (who prided himself of not even having sex with his wife) who promoted this barbarism.

    Also it explains why Americans need lubricant to masturbate – nobody apart from Jews/Muslims/Americans needs moisturizer since we have foreskin to reduce the friction.

    • 回复: @BenKenobi
  138. jbwilson24 说:

    ” In 1933 Hitler told Max Planck, “I have nothing against the Jews qua Jews. But the Jews are all communists, and these are my enemies, and it is against them that I am fighting.” ”

    This strikes me as questionable.

    Anyone who lived through Weimar would have seen the signs of Jewish domination of Germany becoming more apparent. Raul Hilberg himself noted that Jews ran the brothels, cabarets, and other institutes of decadence (including Magnus Hirschfeld and his institute, pioneers in gender change surgery). Jewish venture capital swooped in on postwar Germany, snapping up key assets and real estate. Germans were turned out of their homes to beg on the street, while Jews purchased assets at rock bottom prices.

    There were various financial scandals involving Jews all throughout that period, and the team that negotiated the Versailles Treaty was heavily Jewish.

    I simply can’t believe that Hitler wrote all that off and focused solely on communism.

    As an aside, EMJ appears to believe in the holocaust, which is surprising given that he is astute on most matters .

    As for Lindberg stating that “[no] person with a sense of dignity of mankind can condone the persecution of the Jewish race in Germany”, this is a disappointment. Given the predatory relationship between Jews and gentiles in Poland, Germany, the UK and other countries, the simple truth is that Europeans were TOO tolerant. The Chinese or Mongols would have strung them up from lampposts for even half.

    Every group is more than justified in preventing outsiders from dominating it, whether by overt means (invasion by armies) or by infiltration and subversion. I see nothing in Christianity to mitigate this fact, and Jesus goes so far as to tell his followers to be as wise as serpents.

    • 回复: @Wally
  139. Truth3 说:

    I’ll take one Catholic’s accomplishments and roughly balance out a thousand Jew Criminals with it.

    The Catholic? Father Charles Coughlin.

    Name one other in the 20th Century who told more truth t More People.

    没有人。

    • 回复: @Alden
  140. mark green 说:
    @Alden

    I’m not an atheist, I just don’t believe in God or the fairy tales.

    I come from a nominally Protestant background and I must agree. Fortunately, most white Protestants in America are losing their religion. This I consider a healthy development.

    It’s time to put aside Bronze age fairy tales. Jesus, Moses and Abraham were were all flat-earthers. They were all creationists. These ancient sages had no understanding of biology, geology, astronomy, or astrogeophysics. In the ancient world, the primitive idea of ‘hell’ surely arose from observing volcanic activity (pyroclastic flows.) Pre-scientific peoples had no idea that the earth was round with tectonic plates and a molten core.

    What the ancients called ‘heaven’ is what we now understand is outer space.

    But Jews remain uniquely unified and intact by their embrace of one core belief: they are a distinct and separate people. This view still animates them.

    The enduring Jewish belief in inborn human differences also underlies the basis for Jewish continuity. The explains why, in Israel, you will never see any TV shows or ‘entertainment’ which glamorize sex or family-formation between Jews and Arabs. Are you kidding? Sell that junk to the goyim.

    Every non-Jew unfortunate enough to be born in Israel understands this sorry fact. In the land of Jews, they are second-class citizens. Jews harbor little no guilt or shame over this fact. After all, they are God’s chosen people. Besides, irrational and virulent ‘anti-Semitism’ forces Jews to erect barriers. There you have it.

    Meanwhile, Hollywood Jews love churning out sexual imagery that involves the coupling of a lovely blond female with a muscular negro. Sweet revenge. Guided miscegenation is one of their favorite tricks. Race-mixing also undermines white cohesion. This enhances Jewish security.

    Contrary to modern, ‘inclusive’ norms and ethics, Jews still embrace one enduring fact:

    Blood is thicker than water or any transient pie-in-the-sky 思想。

    (Just don’t tell that to the goyim.)

    • 回复: @Alden
    , @utu
  141. Jake 说:
    @Digital Samizdat

    That Jewish freaking out over things have not happened is the hysteria that Freud built a career on. Freud saw it in Jewish women (and the kind of Viennese shiksas who congregated socially with Jews), but is a much larger than a gender thing; it is indeed ethnic.

    That such paranoia, propped up by the wildest flights of fancy and desire for sweeping revenge against multitudes among whom you demand to be able to live, crosses centuries and continents is best explained by its being about supernatural things; it is about religion and spirituality. It is about Jews driven insane by generational rejection 0f Christ. which calls upon them to wage culture war against everything to do with what once was Christendom.

  142. Alden 说:
    @Truth3

    Then there’s that Polish Pope whass his name who with the help of catholic Lech Walesa and the few remaining White Catholics in CIA etc who survived affirmative action in favor of black Protestants ; brought down the Jewish evil empire of soviet Russia.

    My main interest is affirmative action. Racially, it was discrimination against Whites. Religiously, it was discrimination in favor of black Protestants. Hmmmmmmm

  143. Anon[380]• 免责声明 说:
    @ricpic

    E. Michael Jones and Unzites hate and fear Jews as much as Roth hated and feared goyim.

    锅遇水壶。

    但事实并非如此。

    E Michael Jones and Unz readers do not follow a religion that calls for the domination of Jews in their own nation, the overthrow and murder of Jewish Kings, the murder of Jews, “religious” rituals that celebrate the murder of Jews, etc.

    Jews do follow such a religion that calls for all of these things to be effected with non-Jews as the targets.

    Moreover, E Michael Jones and Unz readers have not colonized Israel with such a religion. Jews have colonized every Western nation with such a religion.

    Your attempt to draw a parallel between how Jews and non-Jews approach one another is a laugh out loud riot, at best.

    Jews approach their targets with pure aggressive maliciousness from within the nations of the targets, as documented by both the mandates of the Jewish religion and the millenia old and consistent complaints of their targets. The targets simply react as anything living would when existentially threatened.

    The only thing that Jews have to do to stop this cycle is to cease practicing their out-dated cult of domination or to retreat to their own nation to practice it where it can’t harm anyone. That they do not do this means that the reward is larger than all risk: risk that includes events that are on the scale of the fabled Holocaust.

    • 回复: @Birhan Dargey
  144. Jake 说:
    @Anon

    Luther showed the Judaizing that animated him by removing from Lutheran Bibles those Old Testament books that Jews rejected at the close of the 1st century AD. Luther, then, was declaring that anti-Christ Jews, not the historic Christian Church, had the right to declare what was and was not pre-Christ scripture.

    The entire Reformation is defined by waves of Judaizing ideas, all of which gain the most power in terms of politics and culture among the English Elites, first the Court and hereditary nobility centered around the Court, and then, much more importantly, among the rising and expanding middle class becoming the non-Noble rich. That process is finalized with the Anglo-Saxon Puritans. That culture is the one that rules the Anglo-Zionist Empire today, and ruled the first phase 0f Anglo-Zionist Empire when its capital was London.

    English culture, Anglo-Saxon culture, WASP culture, spread Judaizing heretical ideas around the globe via the British Empire and then the American Empire.

    You cannot separate today’s Jewish Problem from today’s WASP Problem. You cannot solve the Jewish problem unless you also solve the WASP problem.

    • 同意: Seraphim
    • 回复: @Alden
  145. T. Weed 说:
    @Jack McArthur

    There were “anti-Semites” ever since there were Semites. It didn’t start with Christianity, “Christ killers” etc. The Roman historian Tacitus called the Jews “an obnoxious tribe” who love themselves and hate the rest of mankind, and there were pogroms before Jesus was born.

  146. Alden 说:
    @anarchyst

    I’m old enough to remember those pictures of a northern city non bearded rabbi, a white collar black suit priest and nuns in the full regalia leading those matches south for civil rights.

    A cynic such as myself would think the northern civil rights movement was revenge on the White southerners for breeding the Orcs that destroyed the northern cities. I never went to catholic schools nor did my children, secular private schools. But the grandchildren go to secular and catholic high schools and even fundamentalist what they call Christian grade schools.

    Nowadays the California parish grade schools seem full of Hispanics and the high schools full of anything but black. Lots of sort of catholic Asians and whatever dot Indians in the private high schools. In San Francisco, Los Angeles and California, only black Catholics went to catholic schools and they were expected to behave like everyone else. Most black Catholics are from Louisiana, are mulatto to octoroon and are more civilized than the dark brown Protestant Bible thumping hooting and hollering Orcs.

    I think the SJW catholic clergy critters have turned from the Orcs to Hispanic immigrants as their new pets for charity work. Thanks be to God and all his saints and angels.

    Too bad your family had to move. That’s another thing I dislike about blacks. It takes so much money to escape them.

  147. Culpepper 说:
    @Anon

    罗斯福是否资助了西班牙共和党人?

  148. Hibernian 说:
    @Alden

    …no hospitals…

    In the Upper Midwest there a fair number of Protestant hospitals, many of them Lutheran. The Rush Medical Center in Chicago, which is very good although not as good as the U. of Chicago or Northwestern, was up to some time in the ’80s or thereabouts called Presbyterian St. Luke’s; St. Luke’s was an Episcopalian hospital which merged with Presbyterian to form this hospital. (Also part of the complex is the Rush medical university. It has an interesting history going back to the pre-Civil War era. It closed around the beginning of WW2 and reopened in the early ’70s.)

    • 回复: @Alden
  149. The ROOT cause of their JEWISH fate is this mythical CHOSEN people IDEA, jewish supremacy racial, cultural, etc. their deep pathological chosen people divine DNA neurothical syndrome. This intellectual, religious frame work that led them to invade Canaan the homeland fo the Palestinians since 5K yrs ago, jews subverted the empires/ states of Summerian, Egypt, Babylon, Persia, Roman, Greek, and now the Christian muslims and anglo saxon races must be exterminated. Jews provoked famine, world hunger, world economics collapses, slavery, pedo mafias, usury bondage, world wars, civil wars, diamond wars, child sex trafficking, universal kosher/holocausts taxes on goyims, chosen by whom? when? to do what? why do we believe them???BUT how long shall the gentiles fear the jews, 99% fears the 1%? why? how long?? when will the anglo aryan saxon races REclaim their thrones. The USA is bankrupt dilapidated racial powder keg, losing its best young fighting jewish wars, the future is either a absolute destiny of perpetual slavery or FREEDOM…

  150. @Anon

    IF Roth (a jew) were to visit hillbilly or a balck/latino neighbirhood he will NOT be seen as a jew..he would be a WHITE man…Jews do not INTEGRATE rather they insulate. They 9jews) enjoy ALL the privileges of the WHITES goyim in anonymity, in other words they enjoy, use, abuse, all the advanteges that tehir perceive WHITENESS give them, whom they HATE deeply, and which they do not REnounce…

  151. Jim Crow 说:

    Jews are so disgusting. Spill blood to liberate them and their gratitude? Flood America with the 3rd world and destroy her from the inside.

  152. Alden 说:
    @Ann Nonny Mouse

    Who cares what you think and write about?

    If you don’t like the Catholic Church stop using the Catholic calendar adjusted and devised in the Vatican observatory by catholic astronomers and mathematicians named the Georgian calendar for the Pope who figured it was time to adjust the calendar because after 1,500 years the old Julius Cesar calendar was seriously in accurate.

    And stop reading books which were invented by catholic monks to replace scrolls without chapters, paragraphs and indexes. And throw away your reading glasses if you use them, another useful thing invented by followers of the Whore of Babylon and Scarlet Woman of Rome.

    There’s a few sites run by anti catholic fundamentalist Bible thumpers like yourself. Go post on them. Wank away discussing the Jewish book of fairy tales.

    Meanwhile I’ll take a look at Christus Rex, an online view of some of the Vatican art collection.

  153. Alden 说:
    @Hibernian

    Yes, there are a very few hospitals founded by Protestants. But more than 70 percent of the hospitals in this 30 percent Catholic country are catholic hospitals.

    Don’t listen to what Protestants say. . Look at what Catholics do. In the 1600s, 1700s and 1800s Protestants founded hundreds of colleges. Almost all but a few such as the ludicrous Liberty and Bob Jones university have been taken over by atheist Marxist gay tranny anti White Jews and liberals.

    The catholic universities and colleges remain run by the Catholic Church and have resisted the gay tranny atheist Marxist anti White crapola as much as possible, submitting only when compelled by court orders.

    Don’t listen to what Protestants say look at what Catholics do.

    • 回复: @EldnahYm
    , @Hibernian
  154. Alden 说:
    @anarchyst

    Something else I remember because affirmative action is my bete noir. Before scumbag pos Richard Nixon created the affirmative action Hispanic race by executive order in 1970, some sort of official Catholic Bishop organization endorsed affirmative action.

    At that time, the only affirmative action beneficiaries were Protestants, black Protestants but still mostly Protestants. And the scumbag pos Catholic bishops approved of it. Think of all the whining about No Irish Need Apply and alleged discrimination against catholic immigrants the Catholics complained about.

    And then the leadership endorsed affirmative action for the most Protestant ethnic group in America. F’ em all.

    • 回复: @anarchyst
  155. Alden 说:
    @Jake

    Martin Luther’s sponsor and protector was his most catholic majesty, Charles 1, King of Spain, overlord of Portugal and ruler of the vast Spanish and Portuguese empires and also the Holy Roman Emperor Charles 5. Were it not for Charles, Luther might be just another St Martin the reformer or exiled to some frozen monastery in N Silesia to translate bibles or something

    Charles 5&1’s Motive ; break the power of the papacy in Europe.

    The reformation wasn’t just the Jews and Protestants obsessed and wanking away while reading the pornographic sadistic Jewish Bible.

    Many things came together. From a historical point of view, His Most Catholic Majesty Charles 5&1 was more important than any other factor. For instance , Charles was the man who forced Henry 8 to take Britain away from Rome so he could divorce himself.

  156. Alden 说:
    @gay troll

    It’s the Protestants who dumped the Christian part of the Bible and wallowed in the sadistic homicidal genocidal pornographic Jewish part of the Bible. You don’t even know the meaning of the word catholic do you? It’s the Greek word for universal, not chauvinistic as you claim.

    Blacks are Protestants, nuff said.

  157. S 说:
    @L Bean

    There’s no there there, except the nazi. The nazi is always always there, just around the corner, married to your wife’s friend, in local government, or even YOUR BOSS.

    A good discerning eye there.

    There’s a full on effort to 妖魔化 just about all Euros as individuals (and peoples) as wannabe or potential Nazis!TM, symbolized by Trump, it not particularly mattering if you or your family are (or were) so called ‘progressives’ in good standing, having relatives who may well have fought (and sometimes died) in WWII purposely and specifically against National Socialist Germany. Witness the abuse Hillary supporters got from Obama’s people during the 2008 election.

    Like Saturn, the revolution devours it’s children.

    George Orwell got a lot right right in his 1984, a seeming ‘how to’ book for some powerful people and hangers on nowadays, but being human, got some things wrong. As it stands, rather than someone with a name such as Emmanuelle Goldstein being the subject of the daily ‘Two Minutes Hate’, it’s someone with the initials ‘A H’, ‘whose agents are everywhere’.

    “The program of the Two Minutes Hate varied from day to day, but there was none in which Goldstein was not the principal figure. He was the primal traitor, the earliest defiler of the Party’s purity. All subsequent crimes against the Party, all treacheries, acts of sabotage, heresies, deviations, sprang directly out of his teaching.’

    ‘Somewhere or other he was still alive and hatching his conspiracies: perhaps somewhere beyond the sea, under the protection of his foreign paymasters, perhaps even — so it was occasionally rumoured — in some hiding-place in Oceania itself.”

    I wouldn’t be surprised if all of these storylines were ACTUALLY computer generated these days.

    Also from Part 1, Chapter 1 of 1984 as the previous quote, this time in reference to Julia, Winston’s soon to be lover. Hmmm…

    ‘…she worked in the Fiction Department. Presumably — since he had sometimes seen her with oily hands and carrying a spanner she had some mechanical job on one of the novel-writing machines.

    http://www.george-orwell.org/1984/0.html

  158. Seraphim 说:
    @Mick Jagger gathers no mosque

    All discussions around the institution of the Eucharist miss the essential point, namely that it was a sacrifice which existed also in the Old Law, where it was called ‘todah’, which means literally ‘thanksgiving’, in Greek ‘eucharistia’. The todah sacrifice was offered by a person whose life had been redeemed or delivered from a great danger. It was also a ‘peace offering’ including the eating of a sacrificial meal (the lamb) and it was the only sacrifices in which non-priests were permitted to share in the meal. The sacrificial meal was accompanied by offerings of loaves of leavened bread (lehem/artos). It was also a ‘sacrifice of praise’, i.e. recitation of psalms of thanksgiving.
    At the Liturgy the priest clearly announces that it offers an ‘oblation of peace’, which consists of the bread and wine brought in by the people, on behalf of the people who responds ‘the mercy of peace, the sacrifice of praise’.
    The Passover sacrifice was also a ‘todah’ sacrifice in remembrance of the deliverance of the people of Israel from slavery, the pre-figuration of the deliverance of Mankind from sin and death. The Christ reconfigured the Passover meal around his own self-sacrifice in a manner that more perfectly expressed its nature as ‘todah. The Eucharist is a sacrifice of thankgivings for what the Christ has done for Mankind, delivering it from death. This is the sense of ‘I came not to abolish the law, but to complete, to make full (pleroo) the law.

    • 同意: Hibernian
  159. EldnahYm 说:
    @Alden

    Yes, there are a very few hospitals founded by Protestants. But more than 70 percent of the hospitals in this 30 percent Catholic country are catholic hospitals.

    70 percent? Not even close.

    Catholic hospitals have expanded in the 2000s(look it up if you don’t believe me), before that they were much smaller players. You want to present a story wherein the U.S. would be starving for hospitals if not for Catholics, in reality all that’s happened is that Catholic hospitals are currently doing a better job of scamming the taxpayer. Like any other big business, they aggressively compete for market share. One of the main mechanisms for this is mergers. However even with all of this activity, Catholic affiliated hospitals are nowhere near 70% of total hospitals.

  160. S 说:

    There was a 1971 movie called 墨菲战争 which starred Peter O’Toole as ‘Murphy’, the lone Irish survivor of a merchant ship sunk by a German u-boat off the coast of South America near WWII’s end. [The almost standard atrocity narrative is present in this movie. The sub is shown machine gunning the ship survivors as they desperately attempt to swim ashore. The u-boat’s captain personally guns down the merchant ship’s wounded float plane pilot in his sick bed at the local coastal village.]

    Murphy, wanting revenge, seeks out various means of sinking the sub which continues to lurk nearby where Murphy has made it ashore.

    All his attempts fail, including bombing it with Molotov cocktails from the air using the merchant ship’s surviving float plane, and ramming it with a floating crane.

    Meanwhile, the war has ended, but not for Murphy. And, even though the sub has gotten stuck in the mud while submerged, and it, and it’s crew, may well be finished as it is, this is not enough for Murphy. He wants his desire for personal revenge satiated and to see the whole crew of the German sub dead dead by his own hand.

    Murphy finds an unexploded torpedo fired by the sub earlier, and using the floating crane he drops the torpedo on top of the trapped German sub. Satiating his hatred and desire for revenge, Murphy destroys the sub and kills it’s crew, but also kills himself.

    Besides shattering the German sub, the torpedo’s explosion sinks Murphy’s floating crane as well, with the collapsed crane having pinned Murphy to it’s hulk. The last scene of the movie is of Murphy himself drowning simultaneously with the hated Nazis!TM.

    There’s a message in there somewhere.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murphy%27s_War

    • 回复: @Hibernian
  161. @Ann Nonny Mouse

    “My general impression of E. Michael Fanatic is that he is against the Jews because they don’t accept Papal rule over his Judeo-Christian religion.”

    Jones pens a long piece that has nothing whatever to do with the papacy and uses Roth’s execrable novel, 反对美国的阴谋, as an example of Jewish self-obsession unleashed.

    And your comment is that?

    Was it supposed to be relevant in any way to this article or just something that randomly occurred to you?

    • 回复: @Alden
  162. utu 说:
    @Alden

    “The Slaughter of Cities: Urban Renewal As Ethnic Cleansing” by E. Michael Jones

  163. utu 说:
    @mark green

    “Jesus, Moses and Abraham [did not know quantum physics and did not know how to code].” – I thought you were a thoughtful person, Mark Green, but you are just another fool.

  164. anarchyst 说:
    @Alden

    好点子!

    Nixon made “Hispanics” a race.

    Trump made “jews” a race.

    We live in interesting times, indeed.

    问候,

  165. Sparkon 说:

    Did somebody say “fear” here? Speaking of lurid entertainment, check out the bizarre “Sex Nazi” men’s adventure magazine covers from the ’50s and ’60s.

    Psst. Now follow me back to a magazine rack where the Nazis were still in command and torturing pretty young virgins.


    男人的故事, September 1964, cover art: Norm Eastman, model: Eva Lund

    During their peak in the late 1950s, approximately 130 men’s adventure magazines were being published simultaneously.

    The interior tales usually claimed to be true stories. Women in distress were commonly featured in the painted covers or interior art, often being menaced or tortured by Nazis or, in later years, Communists. Typical titles which relied on especially lurid and salacious cover illustrations include Man’s Story, Men Today, World of MenMan’s Epic.

    • 哈哈: schnellandine
    • 回复: @utu
    , @the grand wazoo
  166. Alden 说:
    @Oscar Peterson

    Ann nonny nous is just another bible thumping anti catholic like priss factor aka Betty Catherine McChesney and others who haunt pro White and conservative sites posting anti catholic KKK Calvinist garbage.

  167. Seraphim 说:
    @Dumbo

    And who founded and funded the Free Masonry?

  168. @wesmouch

    他们相信自己是被选中的,即更优秀、更聪明、通常更富有、更清楚真正发生的事情——而我们其他人则是牛人、非人类、愚蠢、无视真正的游戏、对金钱的方式一无所知.

    它根本不必是宗教观点。 它可以是世俗或世俗的态度。 它不一定像上面列出的那么明显,但这是一般的动态。

    他们最终蔑视我们。 他们期望的仇恨是人们在意识到自己被利用、剥削、颠覆这一事实后所期望的自然反应。

    他们无法相信我们如此无知。 我必须同意。 我一生大部分时间都生活在无知中。 这就是过多的“教育”会对你造成的影响。 事实上,几十年来,我一直钦佩他们作为一个思想自由的无神论者在文化上颠覆性的工作。

    当然,如果你虐待一只狗,你会希望它在某个时候试图咬你。 他们激起的仇恨对某些人来说可能是受虐狂,但实际上这只是他们建立在关系中的理性期望。

    顺便说一句,即使我现在对他们的疾病和他们延续的邪恶有了相当全面的了解,我也努力工作,不屈服于仇恨。 不屈服于仇恨并不意味着我们不应该反对他们的腐败影响。

    基督呼召我们去爱和诚实,反对邪恶。 这是我们必须与之同步的终极现实。

    当我们这样做时,“犹太人”就会失败。 我想这就是他们恨基督的原因。

  169. Hibernian 说:
    @Alden

    The catholic universities and colleges remain run by the Catholic Church and have resisted the gay tranny atheist Marxist anti White crapola as much as possible, submitting only when compelled by court orders.

    Not true of Notre Dame and De Paul. The Franciscan University of Steubenville is another story.

  170. Hibernian 说:
    @S

    Could have been called Murphy’s Law.

    • 回复: @S
  171. PeterMX 说:
    @obwandiyag

    You’re ignorant. It’s a novel because it’s a lie (actually many lies) and it has a purpose, to advance Jewish power and portray Americans as murderous Jew haters, when in fact if there had been enough “anti-semitism” in the US, the Jews would not have been able to push the US into WW II and ally it with Judeo-Bolshevik USSR.

    You’re kind of dopey. Historians are prevented from telling the truth about the Jews malevolent role in WW II and many other things, such as when the Jews forced West Point to pull David Irving’s Hitler’s War from their curriculm or when they pressured the publisher of Irving’s book on Goebbels to be pulled and not published, but Jews can make slanderous movies about others. The entire Holocaust industry is comprised of over 1,000 Hollywood movies and thousands more books that are fictional but it has allowed Jews to blackmail and extort billions of dollars from European countries and allow every lying Jew to walk into a museum, point to a painting and say his family owned it and they want it back, and many have done this.

    • 哈哈: Twodees Partain
    • 回复: @Twodees Partain
  172. BenKenobi 说:
    @tomo

    I recently had a son, and he’ll turn one in about three weeks (thank you, thank you). When his birth was coming up I asked our mid-wife if I needed to get “NO CIRCUMCISION” in writing. I’m uncut and wanted to ensure he had this simple courtesy done as well. The mid-wife said that the procedure is now considered purely cosmetic and is no longer done in hospital (we’re in Canada) and parents now have to seek it out if they want it done. So there’s some good news.

    In recent months I’ve asked the pediatrician when is it an appropriate time to start “pulling back the skin” as part of bath procedure. We were told that this is not done for a few years and the foreskin is currently connected to the glans, and the two will naturally separate. I can only imagine what physical damage is done by cutting off the skin at less than two weeks of age.

    Not to mention the brain damage and psychological trauma this causes.

  173. S 说:
    @Hibernian

    Could have been called Murphy’s Law.

    Hehe. That would of made for a good alternate movie title.

    As an aside, O’Toole’s at the time real life wife, Siân Phillips, also acted in the movie as the missionary doctor who treated his injuries. Philip’s was Welsh, and a Welsh speaker. So, at least with her, O’Toole was sticking to his Celtic roots. Good for him.

  174. Richard B 说:

    It was the last time that anyone in public life in America singled out Jews as a group for criticism.

    All of the talk about antisemitism and White Supremacy is designed to conceal this obvious fact.

    They can kvetch all they want. But, the only real supremacist organization in the world today is Jewish Supremacy Inc.

    A real supremacist group not only demands to be,

    1.置于批评之上
    2.无条件地被爱
    3.盲目服从

    they also have the power to effectuate those insane demands.

    Oh, and speaking of kvetching, there’s only one real KKK in the world today.

    Kvetching犹太洁食Khazars。

  175. @Saggy

    Jones writes 1,000 page tomes with the same dedication to thoroughness as he writes 10,000 word movie reviews.

    The scope of his work tends to span millennia. Check out his book, The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History as an example of his deconstruction of Jewish subversion. He’s no Jew dick sucker. Jews who reject Christ are of the Synagogue of Satan. Direct from the New Testament.

    The length and breadth of his work points to the fact that he is a busy guy. He writes on an incredible range of topics.

    So he hasn’t written on the holohoax. Guess what? I haven’t seen anything from him on 9-11, JFK, global warming or the NWO either. Hard to write about every psyop, historical cover up and cabal out there.

    I don’t know what his stance is on the holohoax. I can see several possibilities.

    1-He never looked into it because he basically accepts the story. It’s one of those cultural assumptions he hasn’t gotten around to challenging for whatever reason. Probably because it’s outside his core range of interests. It happens. How deeply have you looked into the flaws in the theory of evolution? I ask this as a scientist. It took me 20 years before I stopped skipping past the issue and took it seriously enough to investigate.

    2-He doesn’t want to look into it because he doesn’t see any upside to it. I suspect he wouldn’t be surprised at all if it is a hoax but associating himself with it would reduce his audience. I can respect that decision. I suspect he views his mission in a more targeted manner that uncovering every fucking lie in the world.

    3-He knows it’s a hoax and he actively puts out disinformation about it. I’ve read a lot of his stuff and have never seen any indication of this. I do not get the impression he is acting as a gatekeeper.

    Chomsky, for example, is a gatekeeper, for the left. He exposes some of the workings of propaganda or the state use of terror but declares the JFK assassination coup or 9-11 truth as conspiracy theories, without any real evidence offered.

    On the holohoax, Chomsky said something along the lines of, “Even to question the holocaust is to lose one’s humanity.” What a crock of shit, especially coming from someone supposedly guided by enlightenment rationality.

    I do not get the impression Jones would say something so obviously intended to close off investigation.

    Btw, I’ve looked into the holohoax issue far enough to realize the numbers of dead Jews are enormously inflated and that the story of industrialized killing is unlikely to be true in most if not all of its parts. I know that Jews use the holohoax as one bludgeon in their propaganda war against us. Yada yada yada.

    The matrix of illusion we are trapped in goes way beyond that one aspect, no matter how important it is. Don’t make a fetish out of it or use it to cut yourself off from natural allies.

    Also expand your search. Many more lies to uncover.

    A final thing: the quote you highlighted and interpreted as supporting the holohoax is nothing of the sort, especially in the context of the movie review. As opposed to their experience in the US, do you deny that a large number of Jews got on Hitler’s shit list, ended up in work camps and died as a result?

    • 回复: @Saggy
  176. sally 说:
    @Fluesterwitz

    Yes, sort of like the Articles of Confederation that organized the separate British Colonies into a set of war parties and helped to make them capable to ran the British Army which supported the Banksters their corporations against the British Colonial government that dominated British Colony America out of Continental America in 1776-1789. It was not until 1787 that the Banksters and corporate thieves were able to re-institute control of the politics in America. They did this by replacing the government that had defeated the British Army (that is the the Articles of Confederation Government, with the Constitution of the USA Government. The constitution removed all say in affairs of state by the citizens who lived in the various American states (ex British colonies), no longer did the man on the street have a voice. The Constitution made those it governed into propaganda controlled spectators and cannon fodder soldiers capable to fight the wars between domestic and foreign Aristocrats.

    How different America would have been, if the Articles of Confederation government had been kept in place , and the separate states were able to operate without ex British Aristocrats, with the power of government, organized to defeat the people’s short lived democracy.

    https://www.britannica.com/place/Germany/Germany-from-1871-to-1918 have a look at this link, and
    remember how powerful Ottom Van Bismark was, then think the first Jewish Congress in Basel Switzerland,, 1897.. ras in response to two things: the growing demand for oil <= all oil was under the Ottoman Empire and the growing need to defeat rising, strengthening German power. also in 1871 Germany was 1% Jewish.

  177. E.M. Jones briefly proposes two different reasons why Jews supported communism, but doesn’t explore either one in depth:

    1) Jews believed it was a form of messianic determinism;
    2) Jews were taking revenge on European goys.

    Either one or both might be correct, but they represent incomplete jumps in logic, which ought to be filled in with detailed chains of reasoning from basic assumptions all the way to conclusions. For example, does the Jewish conception of messianic end-times require an egalitarian distribution of all material goods? If so, where in the Torah or Talmud is this stated? Did Jewish communists plan well ahead of time to employ retributive justice upon its citizens in the process of implementing a communist society, but otherwise such violence was unnecessary? Are there other reasons besides these two that would better explain such inherent links between Jews and communism?

    • 回复: @FactChecker
  178. anonymous[161]• 免责声明 说:

    The question is whether The Great Satan of AmeriKKKa would have been much worse than what it turned out in our current reality.

    Given that I find the Great Satan to be unspeakably evil, I somehow doubt it.

  179. @BenKenobi

    Good news. My understanding is that circumcision is becoming less popular in the US as well. I have a 1 year old boy, and was concerned with the horror stories I’d heard of docs pressuring parents to circumcise, but my concerns were unfounded.

    Pure and simple, it is genital mutilation of an innocent newborn. Absolutely barbaric. Absolutely jewish.

    I’d be interested to see a study of circumcision and erectile dysfunction. I’d bet it all that there is a strong correlation. And I’d bet there is also a correlation between circumcision and psychological issues.

  180. @Ann Nonny Mouse

    I am just curious, why the judeo before the Christian?

  181. anonymous[161]• 免责声明 说:
    @Jake

    there are many … (and Moslems) who likewise knowingly would choose Satan over serving Christ and Christendom.

    哈哈!

    Thank you, but we “Moslems” have already chosen the God of Christ, and have completely rejected the accursed satan.

    Alright, since we still commit sins, the “completely rejected” part is not entirely true. But, we are working on it. 😀

    We have chosen Jesus PBUH as a most honoured prophet, and the Messiah to come later, for the salvation of all true monotheist muslims. Indeed, we have chosen all true monotheist prophets of the Almighty One, who came before him, and after him. May the peace and blessings of the One and only be upon all of them.

    “God gives you tidings of a word from Him, whose name will be Jesus Christ, son of Mary, held in honor in the world and in the hereafter, and one of those who are nearest (to God). He shall speak to the people in infancy and when middle-aged, and shall be of the righteous.” (Quran 3:45-46)

    He (the son of Mary) shall be a known sign of the Hour; so have no doubt concerning it and follow Me.” (Quran 43:61)

    与往常一样,通过你的异教徒多神论者的头脑,即使是一百万次的谎言也不能使它成为真正的真理,即使十亿异教徒(你们的同类)认为它是真实的。

  182. @Seraphim

    Dear Seraphim. The Pluperfect Self Sacrifice of Jesus on Calvary (The Holy Holocaust) was the subsumed antitype of all of the OT holocausts.

    There are four sacrifices in the Holy Holocaust of the Mass.

    1. Holocaust offers to God as an image to His sovereign greatness.

    2. Sacrifice of Propitiation offered to appease His justice.

    3. Sacrifice of Impetration offered to implore His bounty

    4. Eucharistic sacrifice to thank Him for His bounty

    In His Holy Holocaust on Calvary His burning love for mankind substituted for the fires of the Old Testament Holocausts

    • 同意: Seraphim
    • 回复: @schnellandine
  183. @Mick Jagger gathers no mosque

    And Weebles wobble but they don’t fall down, right?

  184. Anon[162]• 免责声明 说:
    @anonymous

    与往常一样,通过你的异教徒多神论者的头脑,即使是一百万次的谎言也不能使它成为真正的真理,即使十亿异教徒(你们的同类)认为它是真实的。

    以你们人民的典型方式,你们热心地鹦鹉学舌地模仿独特的犹太神学,却对其意义零理解。

    这反映了决定你拥有你所拥有的事情的状态,这什么都不是,因为你就是你自己:这是一个情绪失控的南方人,睾丸激素过多而分析过少。 和所有这样的人一样。

    Your religion is fully fake. All of it. It is an inadequate shadow of its Judaic template, and it absolutely doesn’t serve you. In fact, it calls for your death. It even names you more explicitly than it does the rest of its targets.

    犹太人认为,在经历了一系列毁灭性的战争之后,当所有这一切都应该在他们掌舵世界的情况下得到解决时,你最终的根除将使他们受到我们的喜爱。

    作为摧毁西方的手段,你们的人民注定要成为中心的事件。 之后,犹太人将接管所有政府并谋杀您的所有人民。 这一切都在他们的书中明确说明。

    What they didn’t count on when concocting their strategy is that the nature of information sharing would reveal that you are a product of the Jew: supported and defended by him to the present. Created by dumbing down the Jew’s theology, and then supported by him when conquering Spain and Byzantium. So there will be no gratitude on our part when you are gone. We will continue to focus on the source. And you will continue to be a tool that will eventually be disposed of by the Jew.

    In the mean time, you continue to do the work of the Jew, your murderer, in ignorantly sputter innanities about “polytheists” and “pagans”. Yet, you don’t understand a word of what you are saying. There is no other meaning in these concepts other than a mandate for your death and Jewish domination. Even a half-sincere interest in your Judaic source would reveal that. What a true monkey you are. Complete with a little suit.

    • 回复: @Antoniog
  185. anonymous[161]• 免责声明 说:
    @Jake

    Further to my point of muslims having “rejected the accursed satan,” take note of what we recite every time we begin our prayers.

    I seek Allah’s refuge from the accursed Satan.

    On the other hand, what about those who have associated a man, even a most blessed one, with the Almighty One? A paganism which is akin to other pagan faiths such as Hindooism… the abomination of Mangods.

    Isn’t such an abomination more in line with choosing the path of Satan, which pagans such as you hilariously accuse us true monotheists of? What a pathetic 异教徒 你是!

    -

    See what Islam says about your pagan triple deity, Trinity.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_view_of_the_Trinity

    [更多]

    O People of the Scripture, do not commit excess in your religion or say about Allah except the truth. The Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary, was but a messenger of Allah and His word which He directed to Mary and a soul [created at a command] from Him. So believe in Allah and His messengers. And do not say, “Three”; desist – it is better for you. Indeed, Allah is but one God. Exalted is He above having a son. To Him belongs whatever is in the heavens and whatever is on the earth. And sufficient is Allah as Disposer of affairs.

    — Quran, surah 4 (An-Nisa), ayat 171[3]

    They have certainly disbelieved who say, “Allah is the Messiah, the son of Mary” while the Messiah has said, “O Children of Israel, worship Allah, my Lord and your Lord.” Indeed, he who associates others with Allah – Allah has forbidden him Paradise, and his refuge is the Fire. And there are not for the wrongdoers any helpers. They have certainly disbelieved who say, “Allah is the third of three.” And there is no god except one God. And if they do not desist from what they are saying, there will surely afflict the disbelievers among them a painful punishment. So will they not repent to Allah and seek His forgiveness? And Allah is Forgiving and Merciful. The Messiah, son of Mary, was not but a messenger; [other] messengers have passed on before him. And his mother was a supporter of truth. They both used to eat food. Look how We make clear to them the signs; then look how they are deluded.

    — Quran, surah 5 (Al-Ma’ida), ayat 72-75[4]

    And [beware the Day] when Allah will say, “O Jesus, Son of Mary, did you say to the people, ‘Take me and my mother as deities besides Allah ?’” He will say, “Exalted are You! It was not for me to say that to which I have no right. If I had said it, You would have known it. You know what is within myself, and I do not know what is within Yourself. Indeed, it is You who is Knower of the unseen. I said not to them except what You commanded me – to worship Allah, my Lord and your Lord. And I was a witness over them as long as I was among them; but when You took me up, You were the Observer over them, and You are, over all things, Witness. If You should punish them – indeed they are Your servants; but if You forgive them – indeed it is You who is the Exalted in Might, the Wise.

    — Quran, surah 5 (Al-Ma’ida), ayat 116-118[5]

    • 巨魔: Seraphim
  186. @Fatmanscoop

    Mein Kampf is fairly tepid on Jewry

    Was there any excrement, any shamelessness in any form, above all in cultural life, in which at least one Jew would not have been involved? As soon as one even carefully cut into such an abscess, one found, like maggots in a decaying body, often blinded by the sudden light, a kike

    Very tepid after all, all statesmen talk like this.

  187. Wally 说:
    @jbwilson24

    JB:
    Also note that author Jones amateurishly resorts to citations from ‘Table Talk’ without mentioning the fact that it is filled with forgeries and intentionally false English translations.
    看到:
    表谈,选择器: http://www.fpp.co.uk/Hitler/Table_Talk/Picker.html
    你当然躲过了:
    Genoud、Heim 和 Picker 的希特勒的“餐桌谈话”:学术欺诈和丑闻研究:
    https://www.inconvenienthistory.com/9/3/4880

    – Jones also cluelessly cites Hans Frank’s diary, another creative concoction like the above.
    看到:
    Hans Frank’s Diary: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11789

  188. The Revolution invariably devours its Jews. Hence, Roth’s fear. Frank Rich noticed it in America in the wake of 9/11. The revolutionary Jews brought the revolutionary wheel in motion. The fact that many of them were crushed under the same wheel should not blind us to the responsibility they bear. That guilt will continue to have unfortunate psychological sequelae, most notably fear and guilt, as expressed in things like the novels of Philip Roth, until repentance and conversion take it away设立的区域办事处外,我们在美国也开设了办事处,以便我们为当地客户提供更多的支持。“

    We White goyim in the US are still waiting for that to happen. It’s been going full speed since maybe 1945.

    Excellent writing,as always, Mr. Jones

  189. @Digital Samizdat

    安诺尼老鼠

    What is particularly nefarious and most tragic about Roth’s work is that he is once again tarnishing the reputation of one of America’s truly great men, in Charles Augustus Lindbergh. He was not perfect by any means, no one is. A Scot Berg’s pulitzer Prize winning biography had begun to rehabilitate Lindbergh’s reputation and now this piece of trash film will be disseminating lies to millions of unsuspecting Americans who never heard of Lindbergh.

    It would of been one thing if Roth had chosen a fictitious character, but to have picked Lindbergh, whose family still feels the pain of the smear campaign that unfairly portrayed their father, grandfather as an anti-Semite is cruel, and unfair especially since Berg, who had unfettered access to all of Lindbergh’s papers, concluded that yes, Lindbergh did make anti-Semitc statements, who didn’t in those days, but he was NOT a virulent anti-Semite. Actually had Lindbergh won the Presidency there probably would not of been a Holocaust as England would of accepted Hitler’s peace proposal and we could have watched that psychopath take on a bigger psychopath that was Stalin. https://vimeo.com/410842473

  190. @BenKenobi

    I understand it has makes profound changes to the psyche

  191. Anonymous[427]• 免责声明 说:

    Jews tried to take over the world with Bolshevism and Communism in the early 20th century, they failed. A hundred years later they’re trying again with Capitalism, and this time they’re succeeding mightily. Then the pandemic came along. Or maybe it too is part of the plan, to take down a potential threat and pave the way for their total dominance.

    Clearly the wrong side won in WWII, and we are paying the price today, including this pandemic brought on by globalization pushed by the Jewish globohomo. If men like Lindberg and Ford had been president, there wouldn’t be a pandemic today.

    • 同意: Richard B
  192. @Sean

    In the darkest days towards the end of WW2 Hitler was still going on about German-American engineers building the planes that were bombing German cities and factories, and taking about 50% on Germany’s resources to combat.

    And after Amrica ran out of “Nazis” they never again went to the moon.

  193. @thotmonger

    We interviewed Wayne Cole in his home a few years before he passed for a documentary that we finally are going back into production… brilliant man… we discussed this book and had an in depth conversation about Charles.

    you may enjoy his interview; https://vimeo.com/388142434

    this one of his daughter Reeve reveals the pain these monsters have caused these beautiful people

    would appreciate your insights on our democracyanddissent.com 网站

    干杯

    • 谢谢: utu
  194. E. Michael Jones pulled off a well researched “déconfiture” of Philip Roth and i applaud it. Roth craved reader empathy for his own tribe, without much of a return gesture. He stole the misery of others to enhance the plights of his own. That’s lower than low and faker than fake. Gojim should boycot Roth’s work and any spin-off of it.

    I have learned that two questions bring good answers; “why” (motive) and “why now” (moment in time). The “why” is known. It’s sensing backlash when Jews have once again pushed their interests too far, and Jewish coalmine canaries happen to be trained to chirp “antisemitism!” Roth chirps that, and a lot of false notes.

    “Why now” applies to 2004 (the book) and 2020 (the TV-series). Look for things in those years that caused resentment and in which Jews were involved. For the decade up to 2004 i give you a few names, like Madeleine Albright, Larry Summers, Alan Greenspan, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Robert Rubin, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Scooter Libby, Richard Fuld jr., George Soros, Carl Icahn, Ivan Boesky. You will undoubtedly recall the aftermaths related to each name.

    For 2020, check nowadays’ media articles featuring Jewish nuisances. Plenty of choice , causing lots of resentment. There were also reasons within the TV-world to bring out the series this year. Home Box Office saw market share leaking away to Netflix and Amazon Prime TV. Owner WarnerMedia decided to whip HBO into better performance. In 2019, Warner’s chair John Stankey said as much before a grand assembly of HBO personnel, and to HBO chair Richard Plepler “Yes, you turn a profit. Just not enough”. He then put Robert Greenblatt (ex-NBC) in Plepler’s place, and there is now new rock hard Jewish focus on the bottom line. Greenblatt’s HBO Max streaming service is a head-on attack on Netflix and “The Plot” is an answer to the “Hunters” TV-series on Amazon, produced by David Weil. Greenblatt is a seasoned judge of TV content with view rate potential and the Plot’s producer David Simon is from a family with antisemitism-fighting in its core values. His father was a PR director at B’nai B’rith. I invite you to look up for yourself what that is.

    HBO is intent on growing worldwide. Here in the Netherlands, “The Plot Against America” has been announced with much fanfare. On the Dutch HBO website, one sentence in the text, praising David Simon’s production, claims that “Roth’s novel couldn’t have been in better hands”. Indeed, it was just what HBO needed. Jewish productions against antisemitism tend to deliberately draw away attention from high echelon Jewish power and their grander schemes. Bankers, globalist zionists and venture capitalist are suddenly shoved behind the curtains and Jewish suffering is something of common people level; the miserable youths and harsh lives of discriminated underdogs. Roth’s book is such a Jewish production. And it’s fiction, which allows more “artistic liberties”.

    Several European governments, like those of Macron and Merkel, have noticed a rise of antisemitic sentiments in their citizens, so they also welcome publications that may help put those sentiments in different perspectives. HBO has released “The Plot” in late April/ early May across Europe, the month in which the whole of Europe celebrates the end of WW2 (75 years ago now) and in which the remembrance of the holocaust and Jewish common folk suffering enjoys the peak of its yearly attention. How’s that for a “why now”?

  195. anonymous[161]• 免责声明 说:
    @anarchyst

    Yes, “male genital mutilation” is commonplace in the USA due to promotion by the “health community” as a hygiene issue, which is totally dishonest.

    Lol! You accept or reject what suits your prejudices. Who cares. You know what they say about opinions…

    So, if we ignore the hygiene aspect of it, then it should at least be about aesthetics. Studies have shown that normal women actually prefer the look of the circumcised penis (of course, in your promiscuous cesspool culture, that would be more like 阴茎). I would imagine that is because the uncut ones resemble so much an animal’s genitalia.

    In contrast, the circumcised penis has a more human character to it. Surely, that must be more appealing to 正常 women (of course, in your openly homo cesspool culture, I should also include 异常 men too… *吐*)? 不?

    If whitrash like you or your woman (or man… hey, whatever floats your boat, fag) prefer the uncut aesthetic, then that should betray a penchant for bestiality. Both of you got a problem there.

    • 回复: @anarchyst
  196. Antoniog 说:
    @Anon

    从历史上看,一堆废话基督教是抵制犹太人影响力的最佳工具,也是犹太人非常讨厌它的原因之一
    在西班牙、法国、俄罗斯……是克里斯蒂安。 一次又一次地反对犹太人及其至高无上的民族宗教教义,如果他们在实践犹太教中实施实际上是对他们进行驱逐或驱逐他们,那么他们就会对他们施加各种法律和经济限制,例如西班牙,基督教国家的范式不仅有助于驱逐犹太人。穆斯林将国家统一在一个旗帜下(宗教裁判所),但过于迫害假基督教犹太人,也给基督教一个民族标志(limpieza de sangre)并充当征服新土地的动力

    最后一件事,如果在犹太教中只有犹太人的灵魂在基督教中有价值,那么基督教与犹太教是对立的以他们应得的极端严厉措施。

    随着基督教的消失,犹太人的影响在现代空前兴起

  197. anarchyst 说:
    @anonymous

    Your jewish roots are showing. Mutilating a perfectly good organ without medical necessity is NEVER ethical. NEVER…

    就像女性有理由对以下前景感到恐惧一样 “女性外阴残割” 他们应该同样害怕 “男性外阴残割”.

    你典型的犹太人在为你病态的犹太习俗辩护的同时骂人的习惯也暴露了你。

    Females have no business dictating what a man’s penis “should look like”. “Aesthetics be damned.

    至于 “normal women”, 犹太女人绝对不是 “正常”.

    任何允许她年幼的儿子被肢解的母亲都应该坐牢,而不是荣誉。

    Lastly, you should get checked out for undiagnosed STDS or venereal diseases that were “given” to you by your “莫赫尔”...

    Shalom, jew…

    • 回复: @Antoniog
  198. @Monotonous Languor

    Not to put words in his mouth but I believe he might say that Jewish support of communism, and dozens of other revolutionary ideas (eg, the sexual revolution) naturally derives from the Talmudic concept of Tinkun Olam. Secular Jews interpret it as “healing the world.” It is the driving force behind their sense of social justice (eg, feminism) and utopia seeking (eg, communism)

    All their destruction (see Europe and the moslem invasion supported by Jewish supported NGOs as another example) is a side effect or actually the point of trying to do good.

    The thrust of all this healing is to tear down Western Civilization, of which the chief cornerstone is Christ. (Yes, I know the Greece and Rome are key aspects too.) That’s where the connection back to screwing the goys occurs.

    They are in rebellion against their Messiah, essentially. A bunch of antichrists and proud of it. Although not Jewish myself, I was an atheist for decades and was consciously antichrist by choice. Jewish ideology sunk into my worldview pretty deeply, being an iconoclast by heart, though there was a potent element of Nietzsche and hyper-rationalism and materialism (which has a strong Jewish streak) as well.

    While I won’t claim this framework explains everything (as least not yet!), it is fairly consistent once one digs beneath the surface of most things Jewish.

    While this is a complicated topic, being a Christian who is open to truth and reason (not the caricatures that are commonly accepted) is the best antidote to the negative effects of Jewish influence.

    Actually, E Michael Jones most recent book is a multi-millennial investigation of Logos (crudely, Christ as reason) through philosophy and theology. I’m not a Catholic, so I’m not in complete agreement with him but I have a lot to learn from him and in any case we are brothers in Christ.

    PS: Jones’ book on The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit provides excellent perspective on your question and is actually a good read.

  199. Antoniog 说:
    @anarchyst

    他绝对是个穆斯林,写得像鬣狗,举止像鬣狗,笑起来也像鬣狗。

    https://ibb.co/mR2h9tH

  200. vinteuil 说:
    @obwandiyag

    Arguing with a novel is kind of conceptually dopey.

    Nonsense. When a novel comes with an ideological agenda attached (as this one clearly does) you’d have to be a dope *不是* to argue with it.

    • 同意: Charon
  201. Saggy 说: • 您的网站
    @FactChecker

    I don’t know what his stance is on the holohoax.

    He actively promotes the holohoax, just as he did in this short article, referring to the hoax of the ‘annihilation of the Jews’ as if it happened.

    In his tome ‘TJRS’ he writes that it was a Jew (he gives the name which I don’t remember) who invented Zyklon which was used to gas the Jews.

    He promotes the holohoax without hesitation or shame.

    Here is the reality – ‘Christianity, like Judaism and Islam, is a perfectly absurd religion that worships a god who as described in the Old Testament, particularly in Deuteronomy and Samuel, as a genocidal maniac who wants to and does destroy not only entire peoples, including women and children, but also their farm animals, “anything that breathes”. Fact check this.

    Any person who professes to believe this horrific nonsense and who ‘worships’ this god can have no sense and real values whatever. Something is wrong with their mind.

    • 巨魔: Seraphim
  202. @Digital Samizdat

    “And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.” – Matthew 16:17-18

    How fascinating is it that papists always decontextualize their obvious proof text? And fail to notice that Christ was speaking to Peter and the Disciples, not some phony succession of “popes.”

    • 回复: @Hibernian
    , @PTD
  203. @Saggy

    God creates, and God destroys. Deal with it. If people don’t like that, then they should stop picking fights with their creator. And no, you’re not moral. Only God is.

    • 同意: Hibernian
    • 巨魔: Seraphim
    • 回复: @Saggy
    , @Seraphim
  204. @RVBlake

    One of the things that makes Jones so interesting for me as a person of Catholic origin is that he talks abput Catholic Power and the Catholic question in American and European history. Today most Catholics are just Protestants who like statues and Protestants are Jews without Yamakas But before the Second World War there were serious differences between Catholics and Protestants – particularly the Anglo WASP types. Catholics were more likely to sympathize with fascism – its anti individualism, its community spirit, its anti usurious capitalism and of course its disdain for the Semophilia so integral to Anglo-WASP culture. Catholics were more likely to work together then- Catholic Power if you will. The Jews and the WASPs aligned to take down Catholic Power in the interest of war with Germany and the promotion of usurious capitalism. Jones tells this history whereas academic historians give us Jewstory. White people just get blended together into some phalanx against the evil NAZI. It weren’t that way. Anyway, If you’re of Catholic origin, read Jones. He is known for nailing the Jew but he really nails the Judaized in a way you will not get from some of our White Nationalist historians of Anglo Protestant origin.

    • 回复: @anarchyst
    , @EldnahYm
  205. Hibernian 说:
    @Gleimhart Mantooso

    The second sentence shows Our Lord delegating a lot of authority. It is not unreasonable to infer that this includes the power to elect/appoint successors. YMMV

  206. @anonymous

    Mahomet was an insane jew-hating pedophile who had seizures and, as such, God would never chose as a prophet a man disposed to such evil.

    Now, explain to us how it is that Gabriel of the Annunciation is the name Gabriel claimed by Mahomet.

    • 巨魔: the grand wazoo
    • 回复: @Seraphim
  207. jsigur 说:

    In actuality, the title should be “The Plot Against the Jews. Otherwise one would think the Jews are “America”
    On second thought, maybe the Jews, in their conceit, believe they are (((America)))

  208. anarchyst 说:
    @Achilles Wannabe

    Catholic power was neutralized with the changes made by the “Vatican II Ecumenical Council”.
    Thankfully, there are those who have “pushed back” with considerable difficulty, one organization being SSPX.
    Vatican II was power grab by jews and protestants and was successful in “judaizing” ad “protestantizing” the Catholic Church.
    The greatest mistake was the absolution of the jews for the crucifixion and death of Jesus Christ, despite jews acknowledging their full and total responsibility for the act.

    • 同意: Patagonia Man
  209. @anarchyst

    Totally agree with that. With the death of Pius XII, the Vatican suffered a coup d’etat in 1958. Ever since, the Church has played traditional Catholics for idiots. Witness, for example, nothing but motherhood statements being said about the ongoing child sexual abuse scandals that daily diminish the Church’s reputation weakens people’s strength of belief. This was also 一种 of the reasons Benedict XVI resigned – he knew he was completely outnumbered by an entrenched power bloc.

    The CIA infiltrated the Church because its the last place anyone would think to look! We can witness that by, after the mysterious death of Pope John Paul I who died only 33 days after his election and a Polish Pope was elected in his place (Poland was a Warsaw Pact member at the time) to help bring down Soviet Central Industrialism (notice I say Central Industrialism, where production, exchange and distribution of products & services are decided centrally, as the USSR wasn’t 真正 共产)。

    Flash forward to more recent times and before the US launched 神鹰行动 2.0 to regain control over its South American vassals – lo and behold, a South American Pope was elected!

    Ever heard Francis speak out about:

    – the US infiltration and corruption of due process in removing Luiz ‘Lula’ da Silva from the Brazilian Presidency?
    – US sanctions against and frequent territorial incursions (using mercenaries) of Venezuela?
    – the use of sleeper agents e.g. Juan Guaidó, in South American parliaments & judiciaries to take over S. American nations from within?
    – the huge IMF bribe (called a loan) to Ecuador’s President Lenin Moreno to evict Julian Assange from its UK Embassy?
    – the far-right military coup in Bolivia last year?
    – the US now setting its sights again on Nicaragua, whose democratically-elected government defeated a violent right-wing coup attempt in 2018, etc, etc?

    Quite frankly, as one who seriously considered, and even prepared for, entering the seminary – the current state of the Church disgusts me. Truth begets justice – and justice begets peace.

    世界和平。

    • 回复: @PTD
  210. Spot on Michael E. Hudson. Unfortunately, the Zionist jews have never ceased their drive towards world dominance. Today it seems they feel their time has come, and so they’re becoming bolder. The 3rd Temple is within sight, and after that all bets are off. Anti-Semitism is at historical lows, even as the jews say otherwise, while most incidents of it can be traced to jewish instigators/perpetrators.

  211. @Sparkon

    Jewish soft porn magazines. One good thing the National Democratic Socialict Party did is run the Jewish pimps, and perverts out of Berlin and Germany. They didn’t gas them, though they may as well have, as they have been blamed for it. 6 billion dead and counting. I hear the shekels clanging, I hear the cash drawer moan, rubbing my hands together make me cum cum cum.

    • 回复: @Sparkon
  212. Seraphim 说:
    @Mick Jagger gathers no mosque

    Their only answers to such quirky questions is calling you names. How dare you insult Mahomed?

  213. @anarchyst

    Yes to all that but the beginning of the end of Catholic Power was – as Jones argues in Slaughter of the cities – the breakup of Catholic ethnic communities thru anomic suburbanization promoted by the WASP – Jewish use of black proxy warriors from the South.

  214. Saggy 说: • 您的网站
    @Gleimhart Mantooso

    And no, you’re not moral. Only God is.

    Surprisingly, I think the opposite is true. God created perhaps the most diabolically evil world possible, populated by creatures that have to eat each other to survive.

    Man conceived of morality, not God. Man is trying to create a moral world, God didn’t.

    • 同意: mark green
    • 巨魔: Seraphim
  215. RSDB 说:
    @Hibernian

    I hear Protestant converts occasionally say one of the more significant things that brought them into the Church was the question of where the authority of the Bible comes from, so it is an argument that convinces at least some people.

  216. ivan 说:
    @obwandiyag

    Roth is not one of the ranking Jewish American writers. He is nowhere when compared Norman Mailer, Stanley Elkin or Saul Bellow . The Roth phenomenon is just one more example of the manufacture of supposed geniuses by the experts in advertising that have taken over American culture in the past few decades.

  217. ivan 说:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    When the (((Russians))) are up to some dirty tricks they give themselves not just ordinary names – Bill, Jack, Dick – but Town and Country names – Borodin, Alexander Orlov, Harry Dexter White.

  218. ivan 说:
    @Anon

    The site History for Atheists run again by Tim O’Neill who does not believe in Jesus’ Divinity is another goldmine of information in defence of the Catholic Church and Christianity generally :

    https://historyforatheists.com

    • 回复: @Anon
  219. @Saggy

    Apparently E. Michael Jones cannot post anything on Unz without the Catholic Church going on trial. I wish my identification with Christ were as strong.

    The real “horrific nonsense” in your post is the fashionable habit of thinking with your will instead of your intellect.

    Reason does not force evidence to fit one’s preferred conclusion, does it? That’s not particularly moral, is it?

    Let’s look at 1 Kings 15:3 and the prophet Samuel’s setting of King Saul the errand “to destroy Amelec and all his domains, granting no pardon, covering no plunder, but slaying man and woman, child and infant at the breast, camel and ass.”

    “What is going on here?” is a fair question; “What rot!” is a conclusion tantamount to shooting first then later asking questions.

    “…kill men and women, children and infants, oxen and sheep, camels and donkeys.” This is a ritual phrase simply meaning “Kill everyone” and in this context, “kill everyone in the invading army”.

    What is condemned here is syncretism in what is called a “Hebraism”. Look it up.

    And then find it again in the New Testament where Jesus Christ, also speaking of sin, commands anyone whose eye causes him to sin to tear it out, etc…

    • 回复: @ivan
    , @Anon
    , @Saggy
  220. Let’s look at 1 Kings 15:3

    Waste of time (wrong book), though the mistake may illuminate.

    But Samuel said, “What then is this bleating of the sheep in my ears, and the lowing of the oxen which I hear?”

    That morsel puts the lie to your apologia.

    Then there’s this bit, straight to the blockheaded ears of innumerable dupes:

    And the Lord regretted that He had made Saul king over Israel.

    The Lord is a betrayed dumbass wearing a MIGA hat. Familiar.

    • 回复: @Felix Culpa
  221. Sparkon 说:
    @the grand wazoo

    Jewish soft porn magazines.

    Yes, and the whole “Torturing Sex Nazi” thing in the ’50s and ’60s was an effective way of maintaining old Jewish hatreds and generating new ones with the younger set, as both were based on myths and lies. Now we can look at these sensationally lurid covers both as an unvarnished view into the Jewish perception of the world they were trying, and succeeding, to sell to America, and as a revealing exposé on how their slick but sinister methods are employed to pervert the innocent.

    By the way, the model’s name is Eva Lynd, not 隆德, and that is artist Norm Eastman himself with the hacksaw in his cover illustration for the Sept. 1964 issue of 男人的故事 that I posted above.

    In the interview, Eastman explained that, in the 1950s, he started out in the men’s adventure realm by providing artwork to magazines that were part of Martin Goodman’s Magazine Management empire, 喜欢 For Men Only, Men男。

    Then, around 1960, Eastman began a long term relationship with the owners of the Reese and Emtee publishing companies, B. R. “Bud” Ampolsk and Maurice Rosenfield (spelled Rosenfeld by Hagenauer and some other sources). They were the publishers of some of the most outré men’s adventure magazines, such as Man’s Book, Man’s Epic, Man’s Story, Men Today, New ManWorld of Men.

    Eastman told Hagenauer:

    “They both lived in a Jewish neighborhood in midtown Manhattan…Ampolsk was a very relaxed guy. Rosenfeld was also a nice guy. They gave me the feeling that you weren’t really doing these dirty little books.

    Ampolsk and I would meet over the covers and talk about what we were going to do. Over time, I made a whole list of torture methods. Starting with fire, water, stretching, ice, and electricity, we’d go through the list and come up with something that we hadn’t done before.

    Ampolsk once told me in all seriousness that we had never done anything that the Nazis hadn’t actually done. They were all detailed in files in Washington somewhere.I don’t know if he was fibbing to make me continue doing the covers or what, but it did make me feel a little better about doing them.

    I never saw the story before I illustrated it. Ampolsk was the idea man on the covers, so he looked after getting the stories written after we had settled on a cover image.”

    [我的粗体]

    http://www.menspulpmags.com/2010/03/norm-eastman-from-sadistic-nazis-to.html

    Martin (born Moses) Goodman has a very interesting background. He is the founder of Marvel Comics, home of famous comic book artist Stan Lee, born Stanley Martin Lieber, but Moses, I mean, Martin Goodman was a busy man.

    性健康, 1942, Vol. 10

  222. ivan 说:
    @Felix Culpa

    Yes much of it seems to be their manner of speaking. The “wiped out” Canaanites reappear again and again. It is a storytelling trope. Similar to when in a heated argument one or the party says that he hopes the other die. They don’t really mean it.

    • 回复: @Anon
    , @Felix Culpa
  223. anon[303]• 免责声明 说: • 您的网站
    @Logical Meme

    The real ‘Plot Against America’ is this asinine series.

    I see the series as just another far-left lie to smear a great man, to create tension and divisiveness, while manufacturing a false history that will stick in the minds of most voters.

    We’re seeing more of these lately under color of anti-racism and pro-LBGT+, like ‘Hollywood’ on Netflix and how they twist material on Amazon. Not to mention things like giving the discredited 1619 project a Pulitzer.

    This stuff over-simplifies complex evolution. It also subtly dismisses the actual experiences of those minorities into a false narrative of ‘anti-capitalist struggle’ while whitewashing how many problems (slavery, Jim Crow) were originally championed by the socialist far-left.

    • 同意: anarchyst, Charon
  224. Seraphim 说:
    @Gleimhart Mantooso

    Sorry, the ‘troll’ was destined to Saggy’s comment to yours.

  225. Anon[291]• 免责声明 说:
    @ivan

    Yes much of it seems to be their manner of speaking. The “wiped out” Canaanites reappear again and again. It is a storytelling trope. Similar to when in a heated argument one or the party says that he hopes the other die. They don’t really mean it.

    What do you mean they don’t mean it?

    Jews live and die by the words of the Torah. That isn’t up for debate.

    They take it so seriously that they crafted two different sets of law and commentary on it and spend their entire lives studying them.

    [更多]

    They created entire secondary systems of gematria and kabbalah based on it.

    They spend their lives dressed in medieval clothing and tie fishing wire around miles of urban neighborhoods just so that they can turn on the toaster on Saturday.

    They sacrifice chickens in the street once per year because they believe that the Torah dictates that scapegoat sacrifices can remove sin.

    Every Saturday they avoid carrying coins in their pockets in the collective hope that they will one day destroy all other nations and rule the world. A hope that is open, mainstream Jewish “theology”.

    Of course they mean it.

    The Canaanites are not a “trope”. They are central to Jewish belief and political practice.

    As is the case for virtually all Torah mythology, the Canaanites are an allegory. A concept that is key to understanding how the Jewish religion works and what its aims and practices are.

    The Jews believe in circular, repeating time. Meaning that they hold themselves to be a people “out of time” or not subject to the ravages of time.

    This can be gleaned by their theological emphasis on Saturday as the ‘Sabbath”, or rest period represented by the mythological Golden Age (age frozen in a perfect time, also symbolized by Eden). Saturday is associated with the Greek-Roman God Cronus-Saturn who hate his children (the future) in order to preserve his throne and existence. I digress.

    What the above means, in terms of the Torah, is that the stories are meant to be timeless and circular in occurrence.

    Which further means that the Jews, at any point in history to include today, believe that they are acting out the stories in the Torah.

    A belief and practice that they display, outright, at virtually every Jewish holiday.

    The implication is that on any given day in the modern age, the modern Jews believe that they are fighting the Canaanites.

    All of the Torah mandates and rules (generally murder and dispossession) against the Canaanites apply to those who they frame as such today.

    Those who they frame as such are generally anyone inhabiting land that Jews covet.

    Unfortunately, this means that all of the world’s non-Jewish people fall within the Canaanite category today. Which is a belief that they do not encode (they state it outright) in the books that they do not translate into English, like the Zohar.

    I suggest a close reading of the Torah with the allegory-key to Jewish belief in mind. Its the only way to uncover for yourself what the Jews believe, in detail, and what their aims are.

    For the large group of Orthodox Jews who dictate Jewish religion and politics,, virtually everything in the Torah mythology applies to the modern world today.

    That’s the key to understanding the allegorical and true meaning of the Canaanites, to understanding the essentials of the Jewish religion, as well as from where it gets its modern instruction.

    • 回复: @Robjil
    , @Felix Culpa
    , @ivan
  226. Robjil 说:
    @Anon

    Yes, the Torah/Tanakh never ends. It is a living thing for our rulers. Wesley Clark mentioned the Seven nations to destroy theme for the nine eleven false flag. It is “noheg l’doros”, for all generations. The most barbaric events of the Torah/Tanakh are being recycled today with the US Golem being poked to go whatever way fits the Torah/Tanakh’s meanings.

    https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/961561/jewish/Positive-Commandment-187.htm

    由于这七个国家不复存在4,所以一个人可能会认为这条诫命不是“所有世代5”。 但是只有不了解noheg l'doros概念的人才会想到这样的事情。 可以不受限制地执行的命令被认为是noheg l'doros,因为如果这种行为在任何一代人中都可能成为现实,则适用戒律。 当G-d完全消灭Amalek的后代并在所有时间内将其移走时,正如我们今天迅速做到的那样,正如G-d(尊崇为He)所承诺的那样,6“我将消灭Amalek的记忆”-我们说消灭Amalek7记忆的受戒不是noheg l'doros吗? 这是不正确的,因为在任何一个世代中,只要找到亚马力克的后裔,他都必须被杀死。 这同样适用于杀害七个国家的所有后裔的戒律,这是一个戒律。 在每一代人中,我们都被要求连根拔起并搜寻他们,直到最后一个人。 我们一直这样做,直到戴维国王(King David)彻底摧毁了他们,幸存者散布在各个国家之中并同化,直到他们消失。

    This seven nations to destroy is the 187th mitzah, commandment, of the 613 mitzahs, commandments.

    第 187 个成人礼是我们奉命杀死和摧毁 [迦南] 的七个国家 1,因为他们是主要的崇拜者和偶像崇拜的原始来源。
    The source of this commandment is G‑d’s statement2 (exalted be He), “You must wipe them out completely.” [Scripture3] explains the reason for this commandment is to keep us from learning from their heresy. Many verses encourage and urge that they be killed, and waging war against them is a milchemes mitzvah [mandatory war].

    https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/mitzvot-a-mitzvah-is-a-commandment/

    What are these 613 mitzahs, commandments?

    Mitzvah literally means “commandment.” In fact, Jewish tradition understands exactly 613 mitzvot (plural of mitzvah) to be derived from the Hebrew Bible. The 613 are listed in Maimonides‘ Sefer Hamitzvot (Book of the Commandments), divided into “positive” (things one is required to do) and “negative” (things one may not do) commandments. To read them in Hebrew, click here. To read them in English, click here.

    We are dealing with a barbaric culture ruling us. Athenian debate would be a better cultural rallying point for humanity. Jerusalem revelation at the top of our pyramid is destroying our planet faster than any other thing one can image.

  227. @schnellandine

    “Wrong book”.

    不它不是。

    As for your putatively damning quotes, what’s your point?

    • 回复: @schnellandine
  228. @Anon

    You are not disproving ivan’s point; you are illustrating the danger of getting the Old Testament’s meaning- and ignoring its fulfillment- wrong.

    • 同意: ivan
  229. @ivan

    True, both expressions have in common a non-literal meaning. However, “I hope you die” is a counterfeit of the Hebraism.

    Ironically and embarrassingly, “I hope you die” discloses intellectual impotence in its very attempt to project strength through mere emotional ranting.

    Saggy and Schnellandine’s posts are characterized by emotional ranting.

    The Hebraism, by starkest contrast, is a potently vivid and terse intensifier intended to drive home the point at issue. Another good example would be the Scriptures’ talk of God’s “hardening Pharaoh’s heart”. This is shorthand for “God is always in charge, no matter if the powerful thwart Him.”

    • 谢谢: ivan
  230. @Felix Culpa

    “Wrong book”.

    不它不是。

    让我们检查:

    And he walked in all the sins of his father, which he had done before him: and his heart was not perfect with the Lord his God, as the heart of David his father.

    See if you can, without raving emotionally, tie that verse into Saul/Sam. Or admit wrong.

    As for your putatively damning quotes, what’s your point?

    Come back when you’re less emotional, and have explained why your nonstandard method of book naming supersedes.

    • 回复: @Felix Culpa
  231. Anon[145]• 免责声明 说:
    @Felix Culpa

    @ It seems Jones cannot post at Unz without the Catholic Church going on trial…
    Agree. Very boring. I also wish my identification with Christ was so very dogged!!

    But never mind Saggy. In the truths and teachings contained in the Bible “there are certain things difficult to understand, which the unlearned and the unstable distort, just as they do the rest of the Scriptures also, to their own destruction.” (2 Peter 3:16) People like Saggy are exactly why an authoritative teaching about the Bible is necessary, and should be done by the institution that:
    a) produced Scripture in the first place and
    b) is not limited to Scripture as sole source of revealed truth, especially since Tradition precedes Scripture itself.

    Evidently, within the long arc of the History of Salvation, in the interaction of Samuel and Saul regarding the extermination of the hated Amalekites, we are a long way from the Sermon of the Mount. We are within the confines of the “Old Law”, replaced by the New Convenant of Christ in the fullness of time.

    What is this part of Scripture teaching us? (One should at least try to understand the message. Whether we then believe is a matter of free will).

    [更多]

    Well, let me suggest a few points, aided by the Catholic Encyclopedia:
    – What offenses are punishable and in what degree? Offenses to God are always the worst. Deutoronomy 25 says the Amalakites had cruelly and treacherously attacked the Jews –intruders in their land, we must admit—when they had lost a battle and driven the whole people toward a swamp, in violation, it seems, of the ancient bedouin codes of hospitality and warfare. This violation of rules of war was an offense to God. The conflicto raged then from the time of Moses down to Saul, all through the years when the Israelis had become sedentary, and culminated in the final extermination of the Amalakites by the 10th successor of David.
    – What is the duty of a ruler to the commands of God? Samuel receives the task of killing the Amalekites as a special injunction, that was to be contrasted by his leniency towards the Quenites. And Israel was not to covet any of the animals (riches) of the Amalekites. But Saul keeps some of the animals to be sacrificed and takes the ruler Agag prisoner. So he is chastised by Samuel and thereupon loses God´s favor.

    Thomas Aquinas would delve long and deeply as to the justness of the Old Law. A relevant passage:
    I answer that, Man’s relations with foreigners are twofold: peaceful, and hostile: and in directing both kinds of relation the Law contained suitable precepts. For the Jews were offered three opportunities of peaceful relations with foreigners. First, when foreigners passed through their land as travelers. Secondly, when they came to dwell in their land as newcomers. And in both these respects the Law made kind provision in its precepts: for it is written (Exodus 22:21): “Thou shalt not molest a stranger [advenam]”; and again (Exodus 22:9): “Thou shalt not molest a stranger [peregrino].” Thirdly, when any foreigners wished to be admitted entirely to their fellowship and mode of worship. With regard to these a certain order was observed. For they were not at once admitted to citizenship: just as it was law with some nations that no one was deemed a citizen except after two or three generations, as the Philosopher says (Polit. iii, 1). The reason for this was that if foreigners were allowed to meddle with the affairs of a nation as soon as they settled down in its midst, many dangers might occur, since the foreigners not yet having the common good firmly at heart might attempt something hurtful to the people. Hence it was that the Law prescribed in respect of certain nations that had close relations with the Jews (viz., the Egyptians among whom they were born and educated, and the Idumeans, the children of Esau, Jacob’s brother), that they should be admitted to the fellowship of the people after the third generation; whereas others (with whom their relations had been hostile, such as the Ammonites and Moabites) were never to be admitted to citizenship; while the Amalekites, who were yet more hostile to them, and had no fellowship of kindred with them, were to be held as foes in perpetuity: for it is written (Exodus 17:16): “The war of the Lord shall be against Amalec from generation to generation.”
    https://www.newadvent.org/summa/2105.htm

    I also found a relevant sermon by gentle Newman about Saul:
    “The trial and the sin of the Israelites were continued to the end of their history. They fell from their election on Christ’s coming, in consequence of this very wilfulness; refusing to receive the terms of the New Covenant, as they were vouchsafed to them, and attempting to incorporate them into their own ceremonial system. “They being ignorant of God’s righteousness and going about to establish their own righteousness, have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God.”
    12. Such was one distinguishing sin of the Israelites as a nation; and, as it proved the cause of their rejection, so had it also, ages before, corrupted the faith, and forfeited the privileges, of their first king. The signs of wilfulness run through his history from first to last: but his formal trial took place at two distinct times, and in both cases terminated in his deliberate fall. Of these, the latter is more directly to our purpose. When sent to inflict a Divine judgment upon the Amalekites, he spared those whom he was bid slay; their king Agag, the best of the sheep and cattle, and all that was good. We are not concerned with the general state of mind and opinion which led him to this particular display of wilfulness. Much might be said of that profaneness, which, as in the case of Esau, was a distinguishing trait in his character. Indeed, we might even conjecture {164} that from the first he was an unbeliever in heart; that is, that he did not recognize the exclusive divinity of the Mosaic theology, compared with those of the surrounding nations, and that he had by this time learned to regard the pomp and splendour of the neighbouring monarchies with an interest which made him ashamed of the seeming illiberality and the singularity of the institutions of Israel.” http://www.newmanreader.org/works/oxford/sermon9.html

    • 回复: @Felix Culpa
  232. Anon[145]• 免责声明 说:
    @ivan

    Different anon, but thank you kindly. I still remember a nice comment by you in defense of Solzhenitsyn.

    • 谢谢: ivan
  233. @schnellandine

    The First Book of Samuel, otherwise called the First Book of Kings, is what I quoted. Why? Because that’s how my Bible cites it.

    Clearly my remark about emotion driving your argument struck a nerve. More of the same won’t solve the problem. Neither your recourse to denial and projection.

    • 同意: anarchyst
    • 回复: @schnellandine
  234. Dumbo 说:

    Well, the actual name of the novel and series should be “The Plot Against Jewmerica”. Then it would all make sense.

    • 同意: anarchyst
  235. @Felix Culpa

    Clearly my remark about emotion driving your argument struck a nerve.

    You’re exactly the putz I took you for. Okay, here goes:

    It’s clear my mocking your preschool argument tactic struck a nerve.

    “Struck a nerve”! Cannot that mewl be unholstered toward Richard Jewell after he mocks your charge that he planted bombs? Yes. That’s how valuable it is.

    Fly away.

  236. Anonymous[277]• 免责声明 说:

    The leading Jewish American groups have practiced anti-Christianism against Christian Armenians and the genocide committed against the latter by Turkey.

    Here is just one of many excerpts from the Jewish media which proves what I just said:

    每年24月XNUMX日,亚美尼亚人纪念屠杀纪念日,国会都提出了一项决议,要求使用有争议的用语,然后予以否决。 一些犹太团体声称赞扬这种决议永远不会通过。

    约拉·哈比夫·约翰斯顿 (Yola Habif Johnston) 说,犹太倡导团体,包括犹太国家安全事务研究所、美国以色列公共事务委员会、B'nai Brith 和美国犹太人委员会“一直在这个问题上与土耳其人合作 15 年多”, Jinsa 基金会和社区外展总监。 “犹太游说团体非常积极地支持土耳其努力阻止所谓的亚美尼亚种族灭绝决议获得通过,”她说。

    September 6, 2006
    种族灭绝辩论中的对决
    By Rebecca Spence
    Source: The Jewish Daily Forward

    • 回复: @Robjil
    , @ivan
  237. @Anon

    Thanks for engaging and especially for the Newman quotation. The whole of it, mutatis mutandis, applies nicely, methinks, to those bishops who have canceled public access to the sacraments.

    When Newman says:

    “When sent to inflict a Divine judgment upon the Amalekites, he spared those whom he was bid slay..”

    I wholeheartedly take the point. I only wished to point out further that when “those” are enumerated, is it being expressed in a Hebraism, as Our Lord, Himself, was wont to use?

    The lesson is, then and now, that questioning God (“Did God really tell you not to eat the fruit of the tree?”) is to be given no quarter.

    • 回复: @Felix Culpa
  238. Robjil 说:
    @Anonymous

    Yet the big 6 can’t be questioned.

    It is the new sun.

    Galileos are imprisoned or job-less for denying that the big 6 is the center of our fabricated Zion Universe.

    Bring back Athenian debates. End Jerusalem Revelation tyranny.

    Otherwise humanity will decline back to the chimpanzee level.

  239. @Felix Culpa

    I wrote “questioning God“ was verboten. Dangerously imprecise on my part. I meant to say questioning God’s commands, in any form is, as it were, out of the question.

  240. @Saggy

    Here is the reality – ‘Christianity, like Judaism and Islam, is a perfectly absurd religion that worships a god who as described in the Old Testament, particularly in Deuteronomy and Samuel, as a genocidal maniac who wants to and does destroy not only entire peoples, including women and children, but also their farm animals, “anything that breathes”. Fact check this.

    I have. I was an extreme atheist for the vast majority of my life. Nietzsche, Christopher Hitchens, Mark Twain (Letters to the Earth)—loved their work and still do in fact. Great writers and amazing people.

    Read the Origin of Species, cover to cover. Amazing stuff, even if it doesn’t ultimately explain how life got here.

    Hard science degree. Still value real science, in case it isn’t obvious.

    A proper answer would take a book length reply. I’d just point out that Christ radically transformed our understanding of God from what the Jews and the OT held. Remember “love your enemies?” Not exactly kill anything that moves.

    I know the so-called history of Christianity includes tons of barbarism. But Christ said people will know you are my disciples if you love one another. Not because you got baptized and go to church on occasion. Could be that people have a big problem with sin. I know the word “sin” grates on your ears like nails on a chalkboard. Perhaps the concept of evil rings a bell.

    I see you are relatively active in the comments. Hope to continue the conversation in the future.

    Best to you in this crazy frickin’ world!

    • 回复: @Seraphim
  241. Saggy 说: • 您的网站
    @Felix Culpa

    “…kill men and women, children and infants, oxen and sheep, camels and donkeys.” This is a ritual phrase simply meaning “Kill everyone” and in this context, “kill everyone in the invading army”.

    What is condemned here is syncretism in what is called a “Hebraism”. Look it up.

    笨蛋。

  242. Seraphim 说:
    @FactChecker

    Jews were commanded to “Love your neighbor as yourself” (Leviticus 19:18) also.
    Where is the difference with Jesus’ commands:
    “And one of them, a lawyer, asked him a question to test him. “Teacher, which is the great commandment in the Law?” And he said to him, “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind. This is the great and first commandment. And a second is like it: You shall love your neighbor as yourself. On these two commandments depend all the Law and the Prophets.” (Matthew 22:35-40)?

    • 回复: @Patagonia Man
    , @Anon
  243. EldnahYm 说:
    @Achilles Wannabe

    The Jews and the WASPs aligned to take down Catholic Power in the interest of war with Germany and the promotion of usurious capitalism.

    Frank Murphy, Leo Crowley, James Farley, and James Forrestal were all Irish Catholic members of FDR’s cabinet. In other words, you’re full of shit(much like E Michael Jones). Catholics overwhelmingly voted for Roosevelt.

    • 回复: @Hibernian
    , @Achilles Wannabe
  244. ivan 说:
    @Anon

    I tend to agree that the religious Jews are caught in “circular time” where their enemies reappear again and again. Unlike the Christians or the Marxists who take the notion of a linear progression derived from Christianity; which finds its fulfillment at the End Times.

    • 回复: @Robjil
  245. Robjil 说:
    @ivan

    Circular time is a good way to put it. The enemies of Jews from the Torah/Tanakh can reappear endlessly in time. No evolution is thought possible by believers of this circular time viewpoint of humanity.

    The recent controversy about a Martin Luther doll points this out. The doll holds up an Old Testament with the words “the End” on it. This is considered “anti-Semitic” by many Jews since the Torah/Tanakh has not “ended” for them. They live in a circular time like our rulers do. The “Seven nations to destroy” for the Middle East is Torah/Tanakh circular time at play on a giant scale on our planet.

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2017/01/04/tiny-martin-luther-toy-triggers-claims-anti-semitism/96150612/

    直到退休的法兰克福大学教育教授,受人尊敬的犹太评论员Micha Brumlik去年XNUMX月写道,流行的玩具是“反犹太的,甚至甚至不是反犹太的”,一切似乎都还不错。

    他说,问题在于,路德持有的圣经打开页面上的铭文。 左侧用德语写成:“旧约之书。 结尾。” 右页说:“新约圣经,由马丁·路德医生翻译。”

    布鲁姆利克问道,为什么“结束”这个词写得如此显眼。 “在神学上,除了‘旧约’及其有效性应该被视为结束和取代之外,没有其他原因,”他在柏林报纸《tageszeitung》中写道。

    • 谢谢: schnellandine
    • 回复: @ivan
  246. @Seraphim

    I’m not a biblical scholar, but AFAIK, followers of Jesus the Prophet (who some call Christ) who became known as Christians were also taught to:
    • “love thine enemy”
    • “turn the other cheek”
    • “if asked for your cloak, give your coat also”
    • “if asked to walk one mile, walk two miles”
    • “give to everyone who asks you”, etc
    此外 “love your neighbor as yourself”.

    In other words, its a higher benchmark to be lived.

    With the exception of Hasidic Jews who are taught similar adages w.r.t family members, e.g., fathers complaining about their sons are advised by their rabbi to “Love him more”, I’m not aware that there’s 任何 OT passages exhorting the same standard as the Jesus teachings, who came “not to abolish the law, but to fulfill it.”

    But I’m happy to be corrected by readers of this site.

    和平

    • 回复: @Anon
    , @FactChecker
  247. Anon[312]• 免责声明 说:
    @Patagonia Man

    Do not forget the plea of a man dying tortured “Father, forgive them; they know not what they do.”

    Does your “peace” means you are Muslim?

    • 回复: @Patagonia Man
  248. Hibernian 说:
    @EldnahYm

    Catholics are to people like Roosevelt what Hessian mercenaries were to George III – tools.

  249. @EldnahYm

    Being relatively poor , Catholics tended Democrat as voters and party members and overwhelmingly voted for the Roosevelt of the New Deal, not the Roosevelt of the coming Jew and WASP driven unnecessary war Forrestal was wisely against support of Israel and probably murdered for it though his death was called suicide. Are you full of JEW or WASP? E Michael Jones nails them both. I’ll guess from your name your Jewish. Looking forward to war with Iran if Trump gets elected? Watch out. Could be one war too many. The goyem are waking up. That is why you hate EMichael Jones, isn’t it?

    • 回复: @Hibernian
    , @anon
  250. @Anon

    @Anon[312] Good point.

    And no I’m not. I use ‘Peace’ or ‘Cheers’ as a valediction, i.e, an utterance made in bidding farewell.

    干杯

  251. @Patagonia Man

    Agreed that Christ calls us to a higher standard of love than the OT requires.

    Also, I’m not aware of Christ suggesting killing or violence as a solution to problems, regardless of what some so-called followers later did down the centuries. Again, a clear distinction with the OT.

    Btw, I’m just getting started on following Christ so I surely don’t want to put myself forth as some kind of great example.

    I’m currently reading a book which explains how his “yoke is light” and his “burden is easy.” Hard to reconcile that with turn the other cheek, etc.

    Beyond the question of interpretation (is it literal or hyperbolic to get the idea across or whatever other possibilities there are), it is not something someone just does because one wants to imitate one’s “hero.” It only becomes easy through a life of dedicated practice — in the same way top athletes make amazing performance on the field look easy. It is the result of a life of discipline, a life of discipleship.

    The practice “exercises” include things like solitude, fasting and prayer (eg, Jesus goes to the desert for 40 days before he begins his public ministry).

    最好给你!

    • 回复: @Seraphim
    , @Patagonia Man
  252. 由于 EMJ 喜欢对 Joooooish 电影乱涂乱画,是时候分析和批评他的一个 youtube 了。

    这是由 EMJ 和 schwartze tuchas 编写并主演的情节剧:

    https://culturewars.com/news/god-has-a-plan-for-your-life

    在第 10 分钟时,他含糊其辞地说,上帝注定这次相遇会发生。 如果他相信上帝有计划让他和黑人在一起,那么当黑人有了自己的状态时,EMJ 将不得不生活在其中。 如果 EMJ 没有结婚,这场命中注定的相遇就会发展成爱情——但丁和比阿特丽斯的变种。 EMJ 在 Ebonics 方面的流利可以创作出有趣的爱情诗。

    看着这部离奇的电影,让我想起了上帝对我的计划。 上帝对我的计划是揭露那些对拯救西方无所作为的疯狂的、热爱地球的、反犹太的人——即 EMJ。 EMJ 拒绝处理智商/种族/民族的现实。 他就像一个印度教徒,他相信生物现实是玛雅人、幻觉。 他认为新的 homo/groid/groid RCC 是拯救西方的唯一途径。 当然,他错了。 分离是未来的潮流。

  253. Hibernian 说:
    @Achilles Wannabe

    Additionally Crowley was not Cabinet level.

    • 回复: @Achilles Wannabe
  254. anon[361]• 免责声明 说:
    @Achilles Wannabe

    I’ll guess from your name your Jewish.

    埃尔德纳姆

    mY handlE

    -
    @ Attila the peabrain

    Of course, he is wrong. Separation is the wave of the future.

    同意
    please separate yourself from the rest of society, “social distance X 100000

  255. Seraphim 说:
    @FactChecker

    I will suggest that if you want to have a correct interpretation of Christ’s words, deeds and commands, you should ask the keepers and transmitters of the Tradition (doctrine and practices), the priests and theologians of the Orthodox Church.

    • 回复: @FactChecker
  256. ivan 说:
    @Anonymous

    The bloody Jewish Lobby is not above belittling the suffering of others to protect the State of Israel. As noted the lobby prevented the recognition of the Armenian Genocide as a “genocide” in order to favour Turkey, then a closer ally of Israel than it is now.

    They have the chutzpah now to threaten Erdoghan Pasha with the reverse if turns even more unfriendly towards Israel.

  257. ivan 说:
    @Robjil

    The funny thing is what the respected Dr Brumlik calls “anti-Jewish, if not even anti-Semitic”, is what all Christians believe : That Jesus in the NT has fulfilled all that was valuable in the OT. So he is caught in a dilemma : are Christians “anti-semitic” by definition?

    • 回复: @Tlotsi
  258. @FactChecker

    Yes, you’re quite right Fact Checker, its not something we do to emulate our hero – its something we do to 已可以选用 the experience He had and wanted to share with others.

    I’m a bit reluctant to make suggestions, although from my own experience I found 基督的模仿 by Thomas à Kempis and the Irish-American Joseph Campbell’s 神话的力量 interviews (on DVD) which is useful as a framework as you go forward – to be invaluable.

    As I understand it, the passage “my yoke is light” is referring to living the contemplative life which can be done 正式地 in monasteries (e.g., the Carmelites or any of the contemplative orders of the Church), or less formally by doing Work On Organic Farms, (WOOFing) and living in a tent, if you want to really ‘milk’ it. There’s many such hobby farms in the US & other agricultural countries that host WOOFers – where each day you work for a few hours for your meals & accommodation and the rest of the day is free time for reading and contemplating/reflecting upon the of what you’ve read. That’s the way I did it.

    Critical to our success is our intention and an attitude of self surrender (i.e., not trying to make things happen – which is the 真实 test, hehe, but just allowing ourselves to be shown the way).

    Btw, there’s nothing mysterious about this process: it’s simply bringing the passage: “ask and ye shall receive, seek and ye shall find, knock and it will be opened unto you”, into our daily lives.

    This can be an incredibly exciting time of your life if you give yourself the freedom and just allow yourself to 经验. If you follow the connections (or what Carl Jung called ’synchronicity’, i.e., there are no coincidences) you may well be truly amazed 哪里 you end up (and I’m not referring to a geographical location, hehe).

    愿你们平安。

  259. @Seraphim

    Seraphim, we are on the same page. I’ve looked into Roman Catholicism, various forms of Protestantism and Eastern Orthodoxy and I’m about 99% likely to end up Orthodox. This whole covid lockdown thing has infringed on my ability to pursue this path through church at the moment but maybe I’m supposed to spend 40 days in the desert, lol.

    I’m reading the Orthodox Study Bible and have a bunch of other books. I suppose I could reach out to several churches by phone and see if there is anything I could do that way until the covid insanity lifts.

    你有什么建议吗?

    Btw, will be reading The Mystical Theology of the Eastern Church by Lossky soon.

    • 回复: @Anon
    , @Seraphim
  260. Anon[859]• 免责声明 说:
    @FactChecker

    也许我会快速阅读高中水平的天主教教义。 我想到了 Lavoire Morrow “我的天主教信仰”。 然后潜入更深的水域,但手头有特伦特天主教。 这是非常有帮助的。

    信仰可以概括为三个词:启示、道成肉身、圣餐。 如你所知,一个人需要圣事生活的大厦。

    为了将上帝的东西归给上帝,你需要一个超越地方政府和地理教会的具有合一原则的机构(彼得)。 一旦妥协,那些人几乎没有更新的希望。

    今天要成为天主教徒,你需要谦逊、坚韧和信仰。 然而,这是他建立的唯一教会。 无论多么不流行,多么黑色的传说,只有彼得对他说了三遍:照顾好我的羊。

    这是一个有意志和能量的人的道路:

    • 回复: @FactChecker
    , @attilathehen
  261. Seraphim 说:
    @FactChecker

    You are on the right you have the right attitude. Baptism was preceded by a long period of ‘catechumenate’, a period of instruction in the faith before baptism and admission of converts to the Church.
    You may use with great profit the site https://www.ellopos.net/elpenor/default.asp. It contains the translations of all Greek Scriptures, Patristic commentaries.
    Also the site ‘Mystagogy’ https://www.johnsanidopoulos.com/
    But also pray that God enlighten your mind and open your heart to understand what you read.
    God help.

    • 回复: @FactChecker
  262. @Anon

    Thanks Anon,
    Great video, great message.

  263. @Seraphim

    Thanks Seraphim, especially for the ellopos site. I feel pulled to learn Greek but I’m not sure if it is just my insatiable desire to learn or something more important.

    “As one who has not bought into the conventional wisdom concerning ‘recovery of the lost text,’ I find it refreshing that the Eastern Church has available a Greek text which, while probably not perfect, is as close as we may come to the original today. Instead of one determined by a vote of 5 or 6 scholars, this text is the one commonly received by the Greek and Russian churches from time immemorial. As a Protestant Christian I delight in honoring my Orthodox friends who have preserved this text when the entire western church had defaulted to a translation, Jerome’s Latin Vulgate, and now has widely accepted theories which do not accord with the historical record we have. For instance, a recent Greek edition in the west is done with the overt assumption that changes in the ancient text were done by men of good will, when the fathers repeatedly have written that there were intentional corruptions which had crept in as early as the first few centuries. I trust Christians in the Nicene age to be better judges of the original than Americans in the twentieth century. Thomas E. Martin

    This seems obviously right. I agree that innovation in the faith is wrong on principle and appreciate the Apostolic Fathers commitment to the received tradition.

    There has been a lot of subversion aimed at the Church over the millennia. Stick to the original, or as close as you can get.

    • 回复: @Seraphim
  264. Seraphim 说:
    @FactChecker

    Always happy to be of help to like minded people. I am happy that they still exist around.
    God help.

  265. Jimmy1969 说:

    Interesting that with 500 plus TV and Cable channels …we do not have one single right wing channel that lets commentators like the ones on Unz and similar sites make their case. The documentaries on every history channel are pro Zionist propaganda pieces and American glorification stories for grade 9 want to be soldiers. Main stream news sites as well: there is a whole category of people they exclude from coming on to their shows. It is amazing that these Journalists spend their whole waking day complaining about manipulation and uncovering hidden truths and digging for the story behind the scenes etc…but they will only allow one narrative and exclude anything else. Anyone they do not like or do not want to hear from is “a hater”.

    • 同意: mark green
    • 回复: @Achilles Wannabe
  266. @Jimmy1969

    Yes, we have been raised with a history which is actually Jewstory. If our media, educational and entertainment institutions have done their job, our consciousness is Jewish or more precisely a consciousnesses for goyim of which the Jews approve. For example the theory that race and ethnicity are only skin deep. Show me a Jew who really believes that and you have shown me a self alienated Jew, But meanwhile you cannot graduate or even get into a college or University unless you at least pretend to believe such rubbish. As a boomer who grew up with post war Semophilia, I did not need to pretend. I will now spend the rest of my life trying to de-Semophile. It isn’t easy. With boomers semophilia is almost like instinct. But I see by your pseudonym, you probably know what I mean

    • 同意: Robjil
  267. @Emslander

    The final location of Peter’s tomb, if the skeleton inside it is Peter’s which can’t be verified, might tell us Peter was in Italy when an emperor fiddled while Rome burned, and his remains were collected after Nero’s death, but so what?

    But okay. History supports what? Refer us to specific works of credible historians. I have Eusebius’ 发展史 here. Where in it should I look? Contemporaneous records of credible authors? Which? What fact or relevant facts did they witness?

    You’ve so far said nothing. Try to do better.

    • 回复: @Hibernian
  268. @Hibernian

    Hibernian, thanks for that link. Very interesting. I won’t just read #4 but the whole lot, and more about James Likoudi. So it will be quite a while before I can comment on his article or respond to you. But when a crank gives the specific details of his crankiness, it’s fun!

    I’d like to return the favour by transcribing here in full “CHAP. XXV. — Of the Church” from the 1643 Westminster Confession of Faith, but I’m stuck on a little phone for the present, so it will have to wait.

  269. @Anon

    这位牧师是对现实一无所知的西方男性的完美典范。 他有一个 Wiki 页面,其中详细介绍了他在缅甸发生的事情。 他在低智商的蒙古人种(平均智商 83)上浪费了他一生的一部分。 我将赞扬缅甸人将罗兴亚穆斯林驱逐出他们的国家。 我想知道牧师对这个“邪恶”有什么看法。

    除了哲学和物理学,他应该先学生物学。 生物学必须是研究的第一件事。 人类生物学,即智商/种族/民族差异是了解什么样的人可以产生有文化、功能正常的社会和国家的基础。 具有不同种族的高加索人种是第一。 唯一聪明的蒙古人是日本人。 黑人的智商排在最后。

    我理解他试图理解善恶的尝试,但他的结论是部分错误的。 地球上最好的宗教是基督教,但它并不适用于所有人,即蒙古人和黑人。 如果这些种族想成为基督徒,他们必须拥有自己的教会。

    我们需要做的就是看看罗马天主教拉丁美洲。 拉丁美洲是异质的,所以在有高加索/欧洲国家的地方,你会看到文明。 然而,55% 的黑人巴西是世界上谋杀率最高的国家之一。 美洲印第安人萨尔瓦多(注意名字)也是世界上谋杀率最高的国家之一。 天主教黑人海地是一个巫毒教的屎洞。 神道教/佛教 日本是第一世界国家。

    这是一篇作者在拉丁美洲缺乏发展的文章,但拒绝处理智商/种族/种族。 https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/05/the_illusion_of_growth_in_latin_america.html

    生物学是第一,信仰是第二。

  270. @PeterMX

    “You’re kind of dopey.”

    Really, you are too kind.

  271. anonymous[296]• 免责声明 说:

    But, but . . . Philp Roth has no Jewish blood. He’s a Khazar.

    By the way, what has happened to all the Kazar comments here and across the net? Has the roaming death cult taken matters into hand?

  272. marden 说:
    @jasmin

    Don’t forget the Khazar Fed murdered the Lindbergh baby, Charles grandson.

  273. Anon[186]• 免责声明 说:

    Thank you Mr Jones, for the very first time I understand why the Jews were such staunch supporters of the communist African National Congress. It was not only to enrich themselves but to tear down the Christian Calvinistic National Party which was in government at the time. Their hatred for Christianity has led to, about (accurate figures from the current regime are not forthcoming) 20,000 murders per annum, of which white South Africans make up an inordinate proportion

  274. Tlotsi 说:
    @ivan

    Jews are anti-Christian by definition, but that doesn’t seem to matter.

    • 同意: WhiteWinger
    • 回复: @Achilles Wannabe
  275. wildbeard 说:

    Jewish hegemony and their pathological aversion to criticism and recognition of their power has turned the United States into a corrupt, dysfunctional, and chaotic Orwellian state.

  276. @Tlotsi

    我是一个怀疑论者,但当我阅读新约时,基督是一个不信任或不喜欢犹太教和犹太等级制度的犹太人。 正如当代犹太人所认为的那样,他是一个“自我憎恨的犹太人”。这就是犹太人憎恨他并杀死他的原因。 我确实认为基督徒已经忘记了基督

  277. PTD 说:
    @Robjil

    http://www.galileowaswrong.com.

    E Michael Jones knows that Galileo was wrong. The world is, has always been, and will be geocentric. That is the obvious bible literal meaning. He even renounced his theories before he died. There is no proof for heliocentrism that cannot equally be applied to geocentrism. It has been the unanimous teachings of the Fathers of the Church, it was upheld by popes and theologians for 1800 years; even today the Church has not rescinded its pronouncement that heliocentrism is heretical, despite Cardinal Ratzinger saying that it was the foremost reason for the Vatican II Council – the worst that has ever been.

    I believe that Jones is working his critical essays in the direction of the so-called Shoah. There obviously was a holocaust of in the region of 350,000 Jews, as well as many others. He has to tread carefully when he is such an outspoken critic of the revolutionary Jew. There are others who have trod the 6 million path who have studied a lifetime at it. He has defended Bishop Williamson for being thrown to the wolves by the Church for questioning the narrative: after all Williamson didn’t deny any dogma or teaching of the Church, just the “sin” of holocaustianity.

  278. PTD 说:
    @Gleimhart Mantooso

    Notice how Christ uses “thee”, “thou” which are second person singular expressions meaning He is speaking to Peter personally. The disciples were in attendance to understand the signification. He then goes on to talk about the future of the papacy and His church. Seems as if the papists got it right

  279. PTD 说:
    @Patagonia Man

    The heresy of Modernism was condemned by Pope Pius XII, and the Oath against Modernism was introduced which all subsequent popes signed. Pope Paul VI, the Freemason and homosexual, removed it. It is true to say that there was a Jewish/American coup that led to the temporary reign of John XXIII, because the man they wanted on the throne was Montini (Paul VI). He it was who allowed Modernism to thrive again at the disastrous Second Vatican Council and the introduction of the Novus Ordo missal. Satan succeeded in sitting on the throne of Peter. The homosexual freemasonic lavender mafia consolidated its gains in the curia and governance of the Church.

    There is something to be said about the divine institution of the office of the papacy conferred on Peter and his successors; it is divinely protected (as is the Church). It has been the object to seize and control for centuries. It doesn’t mean that all popes are angels or saints, far from it, Peter himself was a sinful and unworthy man; and yet he was chosen to be the first pope. It is said that Pius IX was a freemason, but he turned out to be a devout traditional pope. Yet to be beatified. With Paul VI the freemasons had much greater success, but the faith of Peter in Paul VI was preserved. John Paul I was definitely assassinated by high up cardinals in the curia as he was about to remove important people from the corrupt Vatican Bank. John Paul II may very well have been promoted by factions in and out of the Church. Yet he created a new code of canon law, and in it he created canon 332,2: should the pontiff resign the papacy. Why did he do it? There had been no resignations for over 700 years. This was the work of the Holy Ghost. Fast forward to 2013 and Pope Benedict XVI’s “resignation”. When Ratzinger was elected in 2005, it has subsequently been revealed that Bergoglio was the runner up. A new faction which had coalesced around the umbrella name of the St Galen Mafia had promoted him. Notice how Benedict said at his inaugural Mass, Pray for me that I do not flee for fear of the wolves. And yet many interpreted that he did exactly that when he retired.

    In that fevered time of the “resignation” many people were amazed, progressives were excited and the traditionalists felt disowned and rejected by this act. What people started to notice is that Benedict failed to fulfil the precepts of the canon 332,2: he didn’t resign/renounce the “munus” which he was expressly meant to do, but the “ministerio”. He failed to carry out the precepts of the canon, hence his declaration was/is null and void. The cardinals and curia ran ahead with it , and they failed to do due diligence and check if the law was fulfilled. Benedict sold them a pup and they ran with it. Why? Because he was under extreme pressure to resign (some say because he was given an ultimatum to go by the St Galen Mafia after 5 years in office. He didn’t. He refused. So even a resignation under extreme duress is null and void. Now assassination was highly likely, given the recent history. How was he to preserve the papacy from these evil men, and yet preserve his life? So he devised a scenario where people would erroneously believe he had resigned, including everyone in the curia and the press, so that Bergoglio could ascend the throne, but not as the Pope but as an antipope, which is exactly what he is. Benedict never renounced, or resigned the papacy, he is still the pope; he didn’t flee from fear of the wolves as he is still there in the Vatican surrounded by them. He is called Holy Father and still wears white and the papal ring. Every thing that Bergoglio has done and will do is null and void. The conclave that elected him was invalid. This frightening scenario is still unfolding before our ours. St Katherine Emerinch’s prophecy of two popes is playing out in real time. The puss that is the world of ecclesiastical freemasonry and the homo-globo filth is evident for all to see. “Francis” has no protection of the office, hence his apostasy and hatred of the Catholic Church is there for all to see. He is the False Prophet of the Apocalypse. The bishops and cardinals who accept him as pope are in schism from the true pope. This deeply compromised figure of Ratzinger who was responsible for much of what went on at Vatican II, who was suspected of heresy, and yet a brilliant mind, was employed by the office to preserve Peter. The machinations at work are real and far more machiavellian than a Dan Brown Novel.

    • 回复: @Patagonia Man
  280. Anon[157]• 免责声明 说:
    @Seraphim

    Jews were commanded to “Love your neighbor as yourself” (Leviticus 19:18) also.
    Where is the difference with Jesus’ commands:

    The difference lies is the factual meaning of the translated word “neighbor”, as defined by Judaism.

    In Judaism, “neighbor” only refers to other members of Israel as Judaism defines it (only Jews).

    This is one of countless examples, and one common mechanism, of misinterpretation of the Old Testament.

    Judaism depends on such misinterpretation for political cover.

    Parallel to this original Old Testament meaning, it is also be a common Christian misinterpretation that Christ’s reference to such words means anything beyond “love other Christians / Israel”.

    Christ was severe with non-Israelis (different from today’s variety) even when they came to him for help.

    Though, he would reluctantly agree to help them upon a deep expression of faith.

    This is a major difference between Judaism and Christianity: Judaism effectively accepts no converts and as such is a 100% racial religion that doesn’t even require belief in its tenets for membership; it only requires birth. Black Jews and converts are essentially held to be fake Jews by the Orthodox. See the Mishnaic Scale of Lineages and the associated Rabbinical commentary for proof.

    Christianity is implied to be strict with racial membership in Israel, except upon true expressions of faith. Which is obviously a large exception.

    In that, Christianity is meant to take us toward the apocalypse (seen as desirable) via its facilitation of cultural imperialism and possibly Christianity’s vulnerability to cultural and political corruption toward communist social values, for example, under the encouraged false interpretation of the “love thy neighbor” edict.

    The original requirements of Christianity should still be held to stand: racial membership in Israel (which can be defined contra the true definition of “Canaanite”) or a deep, true expression of faith and the accompanying Christian behavior. It can be argued that no one else is a “neighbor”.

    For Christ, it is unlikely that “neighbor” ever meant anything other than Christians / Israelis.

    “Israel” has an implied racial connotation, according to the below NT passage. To complete the coded message, you should also figure out what type of people “Canaanite” specifically referred to in the time of Christ. There are older, non Jewish and non-Christian sources that explain it. You might start with the Mandaein Ginza Rba’s commentary on highland vs lowland dwellers, cross referenced with the etymology of Aram and common commentary on it.

    马修15:21-28

    21 Leaving that place, Jesus withdrew to the region of Tyre and Sidon. 22 A 迦南 woman from that vicinity came to Him, crying out, “Lord, Son of David, have mercy on me! My daughter is suffering terribly from demon-possession.”

    23 Jesus did not answer a word. So his disciples came to Him and urged Him, “Send her away, for she keeps crying out after us.” 24 He answered, “I was only sent to the lost sheep of Israel.”

    25 The woman came and knelt before Him. “Lord, help me!” she said. 26 He replied, “It is not right to take the children’s bread and toss it to their dogs.” 27 “Yes, Lord,” she said, “but even the dogs eat the crumbs that fall from their master’s table.”

    27 Then Jesus answered, “Woman, you have great faith! Your request is granted.” And her daughter was healed from that very hour.

  281. @PTD

    Thankyou PTD for your very well informed reply.

    祝福!

  282. lydia 说:

    Horrible footage streamed live earlier when forces in Iraq started shooting live ammunition at the protesters. #IraqProtest #Iraqprotest

    Protesting against Iran control of Iraqi government. strange new to me Iranian/Iraqi conflict at present

当前评论者
说:

发表评论-对超过两周的文章发表评论,将在质量和语气上进行更严格的判断


 记得 我的信息为什么?
 电子邮件回复我的评论
$
提交的评论已被许可给 Unz评论 并可以由后者自行决定在其他地方重新发布
在翻译模式下禁用评论
通过RSS订阅此评论主题 订阅所有E. Michael Jones通过RSS发表评论