博客浏览埃里克·斯特里克(Eric Striker)档案



书签 全部切换总目录添加到图书馆从图书馆中删除 • B
回复同意/不同意/等等 更多... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
这些按钮可将您的公开协议,异议,感谢,LOL或巨魔与所选注释一起注册。 仅对最近使用“记住我的信息”复选框保存姓名和电子邮件的频繁评论者可用,并且在任何八个小时的时间内也只能使用三次。
忽略评论者 关注评论者
搜寻文字 区分大小写  确切的词  包括评论
列表 书签

Jewish organizations are coordinating a multi-pronged assault on political liberty in 2020, naming nationalists, the Boycott, Divestment and Sactions (BDS) movement, the American Civil Liberties Union, and young people who play computer games as targets, according to a telecommunicated conference over Zoom obtained by 国家司法.

They plan to use a diversity of tactics: ingratiating themselves in social media companies, civil litigation, using artificial intelligence to indoctrinate children, and getting the government to pass laws criminalizing the decision to not do business with the state of Israel.

The meeting, which occurred in late March, provides insight as to what Jewish groups regularly discuss. It was hosted by David Sifry of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), and included contributions from Amy Spitalnick, representing Integrity First for America (IFA), Rachel Fish of Foundation to Combat Antisemitism (FCA), and Dillion Hosier of Israeli-American Civic Action Network (ICAN).

The talk was intended to be broadcasted through another group called “The Jewish Funders Network,” which specializes in allocating resources provided by wealthy Jews.

Charlottesville: Plans for a Show Trial

Amy Spitalnick is lead counsel in Sines v. Kessler, a federal lawsuit alleging that the entire list of speakers and political organizers who attended the August 2017 Unite the Right rally were engaged in a conspiracy to kill Jews and minorities. The lawsuit, where the plaintiff’s counsel is wielding millions of dollars, is apparently being funded in part by the ADL.

The real motivation behind the lawsuit — to make dissident political speech expensive and dangerous — was admitted very quickly.

“This group will appreciate and understand, we believe this is the only legal effort in the country right now to take on the leaders of the violent white supremacist movement, to bankrupt and dismantle them through these sorts of large judgments” Spitalnick proudly stated.

According to Spitalnick’s presentation, Matthew Heimbach — an anti-racist campaigner with Light Upon Light — was connected to the Christchurch shooter Brenton Tarrant because Heimbach “popularized” something she calls the “Fashtag,” which she claims was painted on Tarrant’s gun. In other videos, she attempts to tie her cases defendant to a case of arson where a hashtag-looking symbol was painted. There is no evidence any of these three incidents are connected.

What she is likely referring to in the case of Heimbach is a stylized version of the Cross of the Arcangel Michael, which was originally used by the Romanian Iron Guard as an Orthodox Christian symbol.

Spitalnick then brags about hurting the ability of individuals and organizations to engage in Constitutionally protected activity thanks to her lawsuit:

“Even before we get to trial we are seeing the tangible impact of this case. Richard Spencer, who coined the term alt-right, has talked about how this case has been detrimental to his ability to operate. League of the South, a Neo-Nazi hate group, said they can’t open a new headquarters because of the case. Elliot Kline, another Nazi leader, was thrown in jail and fined thousands of dollars.”

According to Spitalnick, her organization is planning an intense propaganda assault in the run up to the trial, which is slated for October 26th 2020 and will run for three weeks through the presidential election. IFA is planning to get Jews and people she claims belong to “interfaith groups” to bombard the opinion pages of major publications with attacks on the defendants and nationalist beliefs on the anniversary of Unite the Right this August.

Spitalnick assures her donors that the trial will be used to generate publicity that Jews will be able to utilize to push other political interests of their community.

In a separate and more recent 讨论, Spitalnick and co-counsel Michael Bloch complain that defendants are “destroying evidence” — an excuse for having a lack of evidence to litigate their supposed “conspiracy.” Bloch and Spitalnick claim that private discussions they admit were illegally obtained and released (“hacked”) were largely composed of painstaking discussions on how to obey Virginia self-defense laws.

The legal clerks that have been writing opinions in this case for one of the presiding judges — Norman Moon — are personal friends of the plaintiffs. While defendants have filed a complaint over this, the court has not yet ruled on this shocking and corrupt conflict of interest.

Crushing BDS With Civil Rights Legislation

The next speaker, Dillion Hosier of ICAN, described a plan to do battle with the ACLU and Jewish Voice for Peace over their resistance to local legislation seeking to use the state to penalize companies and groups that refuse to do business with the State of Israel.

According to Hosier, “legislation is an extremely powerful tool. …It establishes new social norms. ” But his organization has had difficulty pushing state lawmakers in some areas due to the Constitutional issues of present BDS legislation.

Hosier’s plan going into 2020 is to frame boycotting Israel as an act of racial discrimination against Jews. By designing laws on the logic of the Civil Rights Act, he hopes the ACLU and JVP will be defused and hesitant to fight them in court.

American journalist Christopher Caldwell’s 应享年龄 describes the logic behind this: Civil Rights laws are seen by many judges as above the Constitution, thus arguments against discrimination laws like the right to free speech or freedom of association are more likely to be thrown out of court even if they are merited.

Hosier also bragged about helping craft specific sanctions against Iran in 33 states. While California is seen by many Americans as the country’s most liberal state, Hosier praised his organization’s work in helping design some of the most stringent anti-BDS laws in the country right in West Hollywood, demonstrating a stark contrast between the morals of Jewish liberals and Gentile ones.

Hosier also repeated the conspiracy theory that Neo-Nazis were traveling to Brooklyn to give Jews COVID-19.

ICAN’s plan for 2020-2022 will be to deepen relations with law enforcement, bureaucrats, and increase “ties” between the United States and Israel.


The last speaker, Rachel Fish of the Foundation to Combat Antisemitism, spoke in detail of a plan to use artificial intelligence to study the internet content produced by radical leftists, white nationalists and Muslims in order to mentally “inoculate” the public — particularly Gentile children between ages 13 and 17 — from ideas critical of Jewish power or the state of Israel.

The way Fish describes the indoctrination of children is detached and chilling.

According to Fish, political actors that cross Jews are irredeemable and cannot be genuinely “rehabilitated.” Her goal instead is to figure out ways to break into online gaming communities teenagers spend a lot of time to police language, as well as to “tell stories” that use relatable irony, romance, etc.

Fish names specific political groups as enemies in this ideas war: Jewish Voice for Peace, Students for Justice in Palestine, and “white supremacists.”

She goes on to recommend small steps, like changing the term anti-Semitism to “Jew-hatred” in broader discourse.

Who Will Stand Up For Free Speech?

All of this was tied together by ADL operative Dave Sifry, who is leading the Zionist organization’s “Center for Technology and Society Initiative” — the body behind the massive crackdown on internet free speech over social media.

Sifry and the ADL seek to use clear cut unethical activity — like “swatting,” “doxing” (which Jewish groups themselves constantly engage in), and revenge porn — as a shoehorn for broader policing of legitimate political speech.

According to Sifry, the ADL is at the cutting edge of figuring out ways to shut down speech critical of Jews and their political interests online before it can even be read.

A Jewish Conspiracy?

To paraphrase Michael Bloch, the legal definition of a conspiracy is a group of people agreeing on an action. The idea that powerful Jews are plotting day and night to erode the civil liberties the overwhelming majority of Americans take for granted isn’t theoretical, but a hard and terrifying fact.

(从重新发布 国家司法 经作者或代表的许可)
• 类别: 思想 •标签: ADL, 检查, 自由言论, 以色列大堂, 犹太人 
忽略评论者...跟随Endorsed Only
  1. Exile 说:

    Those who try to reconcile American patriotism and a pro-Israel, pro-Jewish stance should suffer some cognitive dissonance from this information.

    The ADL and its co-ethnic organizations allied in this blatant attack on basic American freedoms like speech, conscience and association are indisputably in the Jewish mainstream. They work hand-in-hand with American law enforcement including the FBI. No one with an iota of influence in the Jewish community will speak out against these groups. They do not represent some faction, sect or fringe of American Jewry – they are the voices of American Jewry.

    You can either support the Jewish agenda or the American agenda. Choose.

  2. The thing that sticks in my mind here: Do Jewish folk spend their lives striving to have their name immortalised, even if it is just on the letterhead of some crappy kaffee-klatch of paranoid nerds complaining about White people? Every organisation named here, carries the name of some dork!
    Now if only those rightwingers will stop to think for one moment, and react less like schoolyard gangsters fighting over turf with the school next door, we could support them.
    If you really want to hurt Zion, start by destroying their most powerful weapons: Independent jewdiciary, economic growth (the promise of) and of course, object lesson education. You can also stop buying the crap they manufacture for you in China.
    Also, yammering about “white supremacism” legally opens the door to remind everyone that the Jewish are not White, or if they are white, and hate White people, then they are self-hating Jews, the most despicable type on earth, according to the Jewish. They have to choose.
    The greatest gift of the state of Israel: The entire world is learning to hate Jews…. the prerequisite for Zion’s final Great War.

    • 同意: James Stark
    • 回复: @VinnyVette
    , @Wally
  3. Americans who fund the Israeli state are then guilty of the human rights crimes of the Israeli occupation forces.

    Sue the fundraisers. Make raising money for Israel a crime. You raise money for Israel, you paid for the bullet which killed the Palestinian child.

    • 回复: @Derer
    , @the grand wazoo
  4. We need to vote real Americans into Congress and into the Governors offices that represent our Constitution not the Terrorist State of Israel (Palestine.). First thing they should do is cut off the 11 million dollars per day in “defense” money these thugs get. Their Plan for Greater Israel that has cost over a million lives in the middle east would be over. Congress should then stop the Israeli foreign Legion (U.S. military) from fighting wars for the phony Jews and their shabbos goys. The Arabs could then handle the rest.

    • 回复: @Twodees Partain
    , @Neuday
  5. @Exile

    The crazy thing to me is that how all scholarship that talks about subjects that have a STRONG Jewish influence have a complete blindness to Jews. Books about the immigration invasion will rant about Islam. One of the recent books I read was “Making Hate Pay” about the corruption of the SPLC. It talked about how the SPLC was “white supremacist” because of the “white” Cohens and Horowitzes in upper management soaking up money so that they can chase around Nazis. I thought “how can people not notice Jewish influence?”

    It’s like Jewish crypsis is part of political correctness. You’re not supposed to notice that a Jew is a Jew and is acting in his own ethnic interests and you’re not allowed to state what those ethnic interests are. So, you have books about how a bunch of “white” Jews in groups like the ADL and SPLC soak up money to chase around Nazis without actually identifying that those are ethnic organizations committed to pushing a Jewish agenda.

  6. Lot 说:

    Wow, sounds like the Zionists are really organized, powerful, rich, and popular. Antisemites and BDS jihadis don’t stand a chance!

    • 巨魔: the grand wazoo
  7. Anon[262]• 免责声明 说:

    It is amazing how much Jews hate White people.

    • 回复: @Anonymous
  8. bro3886 说:

    “She goes on to recommend small steps, like changing the term anti-Semitism to “Jew-hatred” in broader discourse.” LOL! A little too on the nose there, Rachel. There’s a reason that anti-Semitism became the term and not anti-Jew.

  9. Jews need to stop their project of boycotting, divesting from and sanctioning functional white countries.

  10. @mark tapley

    So simple, ain’t it? Just vote in some real Americans, and…TA DAHH!! That sounds like you still believe that all the votes are counted and the one with the most votes wins. Wake up, already.

    • 回复: @Frankie P
  11. This article is BS. If you actually listen to the recording you will realize this. They literally say on the recording that they are working with social media companies trying to find new ways to fight white supremacist content WITHOUT compromising peoples right to free speech.

  12. Anon[374]• 免责声明 说:

    This article is BS. If you actually listen to the recording you will realize this. They literally say on the recording that they are working with social media companies trying to find new ways to fight white supremacist content WITHOUT compromising peoples right to free speech.

    That sounds like disingenuous PR at best. More than likely, its meant to allow them a better foothold within tech companies from which they will eventually get much more aggressive.

    And where do they think that they are? Russia?

    This is the United States. No one has the right to “fight content” here toward its elimination. If the converse is true, then we have the right “to fight” the dissemination of Jewish supremacist content via the torah.

    Suppressing speech is un-American and only fake Americans would suggest it. In reality, only harmful mafias suggest it to prevent their actions and schemes from being noticed.

    We are a nation of self determination, beginning at the voter level. No one has the right to force others to stop speaking. If they believe that they do, then they are a threat to this nation and need to find another (or their way to one of their many others).

    • 回复: @Achilles Wannabe
  13. Fatidicus 说:

    No, they just want to avoid litigation. The intent is to suppress free speech but the constitution and people’s respect for free speech stands in the way.

  14. If Jews want to suppress free speech, they should suppress the speech of Muslims and communists. Since those are the people who hate Jews.

    Of course, we know that Jews will argue for those people’s free speech rights. Since, for whatever reason, Jews always cozy up to the people who hate them the most.

    • 回复: @Tom
    , @Che Guava
    , @Anon
    , @Druid
  15. Anon[131]• 免责声明 说:

    Sometimes White Genocide is a “conspiracy theory”.

    Other times Whites are told to accept their “inevitable brown future”.

  16. @suicidal_canadian

    “how can people not notice Jewish influence?”

    That is the key question. How did our minds get so strangled up aht we cannot see a grup aht
    have been history’s con men for 2500 years? I say we because I spent most of my long life systematically not noticing what was right in front of me. Jews hide in plain sight. They are all over every maor institution we have except perhaps the military adnd yet to trhink “the Jews” csuese some psycholical disconnect. there is this thery peut for th by Jews called “synamic silence” which describes the efficacy for Jews of not talking abut Jews except of curse to say aht they invented science or discovered motherhood, but the thng is how did they ever get this mental Iron Door into our minds behnd which they can flurish as a cohesive gorup?

  17. Frankie P 说:

    A pathetic attempt at humor is the only response we should expect from a parasitic worm like yourself when confronted with such an accurate, succinct and important comment like that of Exile. And even your sickly smirk won’t erase your cognizance of the fact that his comment is unmasking Jewish supremacists like you, posers who pretend to have the interests of the US in their hearts when in their sleep they all whisper the same question that you do:

    • 同意: Uomiem
  18. Frankie P 说:
    @Twodees Partain

    I think you meant to say “Gun up and rise up, already!”

  19. @suicidal_canadian

    Sorry about the editing. The system doesn’t give me the time I need

  20. My God……I am so sick of jews and their jewing…….

    • 同意: Druid
  21. @Anon

    [Comments with too many spelling typos may get trashed.]

    There is no point in protesting Jewish attitudes toward speech. they simply don’t bleive in it.
    About 15 years ago I was watchng feminsit Gloria steinhem interviewed. I was a liberal at that tine but her answers to wueastions were deliveed with such arrogance and obvius contempt for anyone who disgreed with her. I began looking for a word which woud succinctly describe her attitude. Authoritarian, totralitarian? they did’t seem to work. Many years later I betna reading in t he real history of Russia and who actually coducted rhe “Revoklutioh” – actually a coup. then it occurred to me how I wuld have characterized Steinehem if I had known soe reeal history : Bolshevick. the peole we are dealing withnow gave th4e Russiand Boshevism. tehy wll brig it here

  22. VinnyVette 说:
    @paranoid goy

    Yeah the roll over and die Neville Chamberlain approach always works! No thanks the alt right or whatever disparaging name you want to call it isn’t interested in you’re weak support!

    • 回复: @Wally
    , @paranoid goy
  23. VinnyVette 说:

    Real simple… Do not patronize anti free speech services like Zoom. Money talks!

  24. VinnyVette 说:

    Stifling any speech you don’t like is still STIFLING FREE SPEECH! Your comment is b.s. not the article!

    • 同意: RumpelstiltskinTheGoy
  25. Yngvar 说:

    She goes on to recommend small steps, like changing the term anti-Semitism to “Jew-hatred” in broader discourse.

    Is this new? I’ve been calling the cranks jew-haters for ages. It seems to animate them more than the antisemitism charge. It works.

    • 回复: @jbwilson24
  26. Tom 说:

    我想知道丹尼斯·普拉格(Dennis Prager)和许多“保守派”犹太人对此有何看法?
    例如,对此保持沉默将是默契。 那我们就真能看出谁是真人了
    士兵们正在为言论自由而战。 我的猜测是,电视和电台的好人犹太“保守派”只是一种消遣,给人的印象并非所有的“说服”都具有相同的政治和文化特征。 毕竟,新保守主义运动是与保守主义无关的犹太人/以色列运动。 我希望我对此有些偏执,但事实并非如此,并且有真正的正义事业战士,无论是犹太人还是外邦人。 喜欢这个网站!

    • 同意: Mustapha Mond, jbwilson24, CBTerry
    • 回复: @Sick of Orcs
  27. Well, here’s a good opportunity for leftists, rightists, libertarians, Muslims, and even some Jews to unite against these Zionists and their conspiracies. But I somehow doubt it.

  28. @shitsandwich

    Who will define what is White supremacist content?

    I have been called a “White supremacist” simply for stating the fact that Jews are extremely over-represented in U.S. media.

    If this guy were White, he’d be most probably get called a White supremacist too:

  29. Exile 说:

    Keep crowing about your supremacy. It helps more of us Notice.

    I’ve told you this before, but Ashkepaths just can’t help themselves.

  30. Exile 说:

    Every historian who would normally write about Jews thinks of what happened to David Irving. Every social scientist thinks of what they tried to do to Kevin MacDonald. Every web publisher thinks of how much shit Ron Unz has had to weather over the years – and he’s Jewish.

    It’s all about Joe Sobran’s famous line – you dare not speak out against this tiny, oppressed, powerless minority – or they will destroy you.

    Their true story will not be known to the mainstream until we first remove them from positions of crypsis, influence and wealth that permit them to do the kinds of things they are planning in this Zoom meeting.

    Most of us are still too afraid, but there are more of us who’ve had enough and are no longer afraid every day.

    Noticing is forever – you cannot see the world the same way again once you understand the real power-dynamics of our modern society.

    • 同意: St-Germain, Truth3, Robert Dolan
  31. neutral 说:

    Excellent example for all the dumb cucks out there, that still are jew arse lickers, what the jew thinks of you.

  32. Tom 说:

    Communism, which of course has had a decidedly Jewish influence in the early
    20th century as well as in the Critical Theory Marxist movement starting in the 1930s is characterized by, among other things, opportunism and a genius for using any group, even enemies, at the precise time when that group is needed most. When an objective is realized, that group then becomes a targeted group.
    History proves this, especially Russian history.

  33. gotmituns 说:

    “Plan Multi-Front Assault On Free Speech Over Zoom”
    “Plan?” – Hasn’t this been SOP for decades now?

  34. Truth3 说:

    One of the fundamental tools Jews use, is to ridicule those that are wise to their evil ways.

    Calling someone a “conspiracy theorist” to smear them ranks high… calling them an “anti-semite” is higher, but the trump card is calling someone a “nazi”.

    In reality, conspiracy theorists know a little bit about the jews.

    Anti-semites are those that know a lot about the jews.

    Those called “nazi” are those that know, and do something with that knowledge.

    • 同意: RumpelstiltskinTheGoy
  35. Desert Fox 说:

    The ZUS has been under zionist control since 1913 when the zionists fastened their privately owned FED and IRS on the people of America and then came the wars for profit for the zionists banking kabal and the wars became perpetual along with the destruction of our freedom.

    The joint attack on the WTC on 911 by Israel and zionist traitors in the ZUS government and blamed on the Arabs to provide the excuse to destroy the middle east for Israel, proved for any thinking America that we are under zionist control and have been since 1913.

    In addition, if any further proof of zionist control was needed , this phony coronavirus-scamdemic proves that all the governments of the world are under zionist control and this control is absolute as the zionist control the central banks of every country in the world, another mind boggling scam.

    Orwell said, imagine the future as a boot smashing you in the face, I would add imagine a zionist boot smashing you in the face.

    • 同意: Druid
  36. Anonymous[230]• 免责声明 说:

    Yes, it is, but if you haven’t worked with them, say, in NYC on Wall Street, you may be able to intellectually grasp the depths of their seething hatred but not emotionally to the point it motivates action. What I’m talking about is a straightforward, natural law right to self-preservation in the face of their now open calls for the extermination of “whiteness” and “white privilege,” which bad as they are, barely conceal the sort of genocide they may have planned for us that their grandparents and great grandparents inflicted on tens of millions of Russians a century ago.

    Let me give you a harmless story about their attitudes toward us, in this case regarding commuting into the City from Long Island. Years ago at the Manhasset train station’s platform nobody would dream of being so crude as to form a group at the door positions to barge onto the train, even if it meant not getting a seat for the 30-min ride into the City. Then all of a sudden and as if acting in unison, Jews from outside Manhasset started getting dropped off and boarding the train in Manhasset and immediately forming semi-circles of Jews at every door position. This went on for a long time before the Manhassetites said we can play this game too, and barged into these groupings before the trains pulled in. All of a sudden, no more Jews storming the train doors for seats.

    My point is, they’re not all-powerful gods, although they surely give that impression as we mistake their toadeating stooges in Congress, operatives in the White House, and agents running the all important cabinet departments for Americans like us, when in fact all branches of government are as completely Jewish controlled as any Medieval fiefdom.

    Just the other night I had their groveling, \$40 million-a-year water boy, Sean Hannity, on for a few minutes, and caught him worshipfully announcing he had an interview with one of his masters, Bob “Israel First” Kraft, coming up. Laura Ingraham is even more worshipful toward Epstein’s longtime counsel, Allan Dershowitz. This Fox News’ shtick was pioneered by Phil Donahue decades ago, who’d sit in worshipful awe as Jewish spokesmen posing as a neutral experts explained to the dumbstruck goy how things work in this world and what emotions are acceptable and which are not.

    • 谢谢: mark green
    • 回复: @Anon
  37. Che Guava 说:

    Commumists hate Jews? That is one of the most laughably simplistic things I have read this year.

    • 同意: kikz
    • 回复: @Commentator Mike
  38. The ADL, ACLU, SPLC, and NAACP were all funded by Communists or started by Communists.

  39. jbwilson24 说:

    Jews supported free speech only when it suited their interests in undermining Christian civilization. Thus they were for obscenity in movies and television, critiques of ‘white privilege’, etc etc.

    As soon as speech involves criticism of Jews (or their values) the narrative does a 180. Then they become ruthless commissars who seek to destroy the lives of whatever miscreant dared to differ with Jewish vanity.

    It’s a shame the brainless Christian zionists haven’t figured this out.

    Free speech is merely a tactic, not a value.

    • 同意: RumpelstiltskinTheGoy, kikz
    • 回复: @anarchyst
  40. jbwilson24 说:

    “I’ve been calling the cranks jew-haters for ages. It seems to animate them more than the antisemitism charge.”

    I fail to see anything wrong with hating Jews. The orthodox are ugly, smelly, inbred schmucks who engage in every form of fraud possible. The left wing ‘reform’ kind are specialists at nation wrecking and ruining civilizations. Both are narcissistic, clannish, hypocritical and butt ugly. Even with plastic surgery they still resemble goblins. I wouldn’t care so much if they hadn’t taken over western countries and used their power to import Muslims and other undesirables.

    I can acknowledge Jewish contributions in science, etc, while still disliking them as a group. The same goes for Indians and a variety of other groups that I can’t stand. Somalis, Arabs, Afghans… completely useless people, unfit for residence in the west. Jews are merely the most powerful of these undesirables.

    The idea that we must respect each and every group is pure nonsense. I’m under no obligation to refrain from hating anyone. I’m under an obligation to refrain from HARMING other people without reason, but the law (as of yet) does not impose limitations on psychological attitudes.

    • 回复: @Tom
    , @pill
  41. The Jews hate whites. The Jews hate Christians. The Jews especially hate Jesus Christ and His Church and the Jews created the ADL after the Leo Frank lynching and the ADL is a domestic spying operation that rats out white christians to the various “intelligence agencies”


  42. Che Guava 说:

    This flu panic (pandemic ~ dem) propaganda is more stupid than your stupid assertion, but yours is more clearly total b.s.

    You are not good at propaganda,

  43. Wally 说:

    Yawn. More Zionist propaganda.

    – The “Neville Chamberlain approach” was the right thing do as the vast majority of Germans in the Sudetenland wanted to be part of Germany.

    • 同意: Druid
  44. Usura 说:

    I thought “how can people not notice Jewish influence?”

    The simplest explanation is that they appear physically similar to Europeans when compared side by side with blacks and Asians. In the words of Jared Taylor: “They look white to me.” But here’s a fancier take:


    In the case of America, which, your username notwithstanding, I judge to be your emphasis given your reference to the ADL and SPLC, Jewish influence is 烤入. Puritanism and related protestant founding faiths of the U.S. have 时刻 been philosemitic. It’s not surprising that this has born fruit in this century as near complete institutional capture by the people who these religions identify as “chosen”. Once this happens, asking why people can’t notice Jewish influence in American institutions is like asking why they can’t notice American influence in American institutions. Why can’t fish notice water? Many ethnically European Americans would like for there to be a substantial difference between American influence and Jewish influence, but historically, there just isn’t; America is utterly bound at the beginning to Jewish supremacy, first in theory, and later in fact. Jewish power wanes when the power of protestant faiths wane; that process has begun but is still in its infancy.

    So I disagree with Exile’s point, or rather I don’t think it answered your question. Jewish terror tactics are the reason why those who notice Jewish power don’t do much about it, but it’s not the reason why 最先进的 fail to notice that power in the first place. Jews of course use other tactics, like changing their names or intermarrying with gentiles, but the primary reason why their power is silent is because of the expertly designed memetic parasite known as Christianity which teaches a 连续性 between Jews and Europeans.

  45. Wally 说:
    @paranoid goy

    “If you really want to hurt Zion, start by destroying their most powerful weapons: Independent jewdiciary, economic growth (the promise of) and of course, object lesson education.”

    You curiously missed Zion’s real & unearned source of power, the ridiculous and impossible “holocaust” narrative.

    That easily debunked propaganda / fantasy is their “most powerful weapon”.

    • 回复: @paranoid goy
  46. sally 说:

    keeping media open access and freely accessible by all is a duty of all who operate the government.

    Media should be first order government concern, congress itself has an undeniable duty with regard to the media to make sure the government imposes first amendment obligation to protect the rights of all speakers to gain access to all media, public or private, because media is the means by which all speech is expressed; without media there can be no expression of speech.

    The first Amendment was among ten such amendments all ten amendments were given to the founders, as preconditions, if you don’t amend your proposed constitution to include these rights, there will be no ratification, and without ratification your constitution will not be allowed.

    The constitution would not have been ratified unless the ten amendments were made a part of the constitution. because of the would not have been ratified status of the ten amendments, these amendments and their enforcement are essential elements in maintaining, for those who operate the government, authority to operate it. (these amendments impose operating boundaries and must do or perform duties).

    Ratification for this constitution was obtained by a founder self-serving clause placed in Article VII of the Constitution of the USA. Article VII says, the Ratification of the Conventions of nine States shall be sufficient for the Establishment of this Constitution between the States ratifying the Same. Please note the People were not consulted when the constitution was ratified. Did the States, that sent drafters to the Philadelphia convention, deny its citizens to be a part of the process called ratification?

    The constitution gained ratification status, only if, the Founders constitution obligated those who were to operate the government, the Constitution authorized, to enforce without exception, the bill of rights: as enumerated in the 1st ten amendments.

    The first ten amendments precondition the existence of the Constitution. Without the 1st Ten Amendments, the constitution was just one more piece of paper. Does that mean if the operators of government fail to comply with, infringe on, abridge, or deny their duty to impose the Bill of Rights on the society it governs, that the constitution itself becomes null and void?

    Why should the persons on the inside (government operators) make any decisions whatsoever about their duties required, and the authority to act while in service to the government. Making those decisions should all be reserved to those who are to be the governed?

    Why should not failure of the government, or on the part of those who operate it, to keep the constitutional promises made in response to the terms and conditions expressed in the ten amendments, negate the entire constitution? These ten amendments protect humanity from Tyranny by those who are the Governors.

    Why should failure to uphold the conditions granted to overcome objection to ratification of the constitution, not be sufficient cause to declare the Constitution itself null and void for lack of the performance on the conditions upon which ratification of the constitution was based?

    When the persons who operate the government, ignore the preconditions upon which the constitution that put them in power was based, is that not sufficient to deny their claim to legitimacy?

    Seems to me claims of the operators of government that they have the right to lead, are based on the authority and duties prescribed in, and individually spelled out in the words of the amended constitution.

    I cannot see how failure of all those in privity with the government to meet the conditions of the constitutional contract can continue to claim to authority when the government (the Congress, the executive, the judicial and the various state and local subdivisions thereof) fail to eliminate all barriers that would deny speech of any kind access to the public or private media.

    As I see it, the first amendment makes it clear no person, public or private, has the authority to control, gate or condition access to, or to deny or erect any barrier that would, indirectly or directly, deny, delay or alter the use of any media to any person for any reason. The 1st ten amendments [BoRs] are conditions precedent to the existence of the constitution itself. Government has no choice but to impose these BoRs contract conditions on all persons, at all times, in all places, in both public and private sectors of the governed space.

    As I see it, because the Bill of Rights are preconditions, government, and or its operators, may not find, develop or invent excuses, such as greater or lesser or impelling needs to justify curtailing speech or to interfere with the right of every USA governed living human being. The rights expressed in the Bill of Rights are unlimited unless expressly made finite or conditional by the writings that constitute the words in the amendment.

    Historically, these rights, expressed as the Bill of Rights (1st Ten (Bill of Rights) Amendments to the Constitution of the USA, were derivatives of the necessary justification found in the first clause of the Declaration of Independence. and the second clause in the same Declaration of Independence document use the behavioral History of the present [government] of repeated injuries and usurpations as justification adequate to deny the current government its authority to continue.

    No risk that might deny freedom seems greater to me, than when operators of government violate obligations expressed in the founding documents of a nation state,

    What should the governed do, when it is discovered that preconditions designed and embedded in the founding documents which were designed to prevent the operators of government from using the government to engage in Tyranny have been ignored, infringed on, or violated?

    It seems to me denying, or allowing others to deny, any person, or any class of persons, equal speech access to express speech in or on public or private media is a flagrant violation of the first amendment.

    It seems to me denying those who work for, or who contract with government to voice their experience in media is a violation of the First Amendment.

    It seems to me denying standing to be heard in a court of law or at hearing conducted by government or one or more of its operative extensions, is a violation of the first Amendment.

    It seems to me sealing from view documents of any kind, constitutes a violation of the first Amendment.

    It seems to me the first Amendment makes it clear, no authority exist for government to deny anyone, public or private access to media. and clearly imposes the duty on all in government to deny anyone, public or private, any way to deny free speech.

    It seems to me, no subject matter is sold bold, or so challenging, or so damaging, that revealing its content would cause a harm greater than not revealing it. The right of persons to speak and to be heard is absolute.

    It seems to me, in the case of determining the meaning of a constitution: is it rational, reasonable or even sufficient that a court formed under the authority of the constitution should have jurisdiction to settle disputes between the governors and the governed? Can a constitutional court decide a constitutional issue. I think not?

    If the Bill of Rights clauses are changed does that negate existing Article V ratification?

    When it comes to the bill of rights, the issue of infringement or refusal reach to continuation of the constitution itself. Those who operate the USA government derive their authority to operate and impose their will on those who are the governed, only because of the constitution.. So if the duties the Bill of Rights impose on those who operate the government are ignored or infringed, does that act quash the permission upon which the constitution was installed (basically ratification).

    When government officials fail, by law or force, to protect the rights granted as conditions precedent to the Constitution, does that mean ratification of the constitution disappears? If not, there is little justification for a constitution at all?

    Have officials in charge already truncated and ended the constitution itself? Seems to me unless government (congress, executive and judiciary) by law or force denies infringement on the Bill of Rights, in public and private there is no constitution; its clauses were abdicated by governments own actions. .

  47. @Che Guava

    Not all communists are the same. The Japanese Red Army didn’t care much for Jewish lives when it was gunning them down indiscriminately at Tel Aviv airport.

  48. Neuday 说:
    @mark tapley

    We need to vote real Americans into Congress and into the Governors offices that represent our Constitution not the Terrorist State of Israel (Palestine.)

    Any candidate that makes any such noises will either have their past endlessly dredged for dirt or will have a very well funded opponent. Everyone must bend their knee before the jew.

    Oh, and that Constitution? It’s observably a dead letter. You’re not voting your way out of this.

  49. Corrupt 说:

    My willingness or unwillingness to support BDS is supported by my first amendment rights, which I am unwilling to give up for Israel or any other country.

  50. Pop Warner 说:

    Controlled opposition. Blame everybody except jews for problems they cause, herd curious whites away from the truth, and become vicious attack dogs were anybody to criticize the precious, innocent jews. This explains much of the mainstream anti-immigrant folks who want to tell us all day about how evil muslims are because they hate jews (and, um, Christians too I guess). They’ll go into histrionics if you ever bring up the jewish role in these movements or make any pro-white statement.

    • 回复: @Anonymous
  51. @sally

    Jacob Frey, mayor of Minneapolis: “It is for us as leaders to see this for what it is and call it for what it is.”

    Will Frey call it the outcome of Israeli training of US police forces?

    Will Frey observe that it is just like the way Palestinians are treated by Israelis?

    h/t geokat62:
    IDF Restrain Palestinian – – – – – Minneapolis police knee restraining George Floyd

    “His family is Jewish and of Ukrainian descent” -wikipedia

    • 谢谢: mark green
    • 回复: @Wally
    , @Commentator Mike
  52. Art 说:

    Wow, sounds like the Zionists are really organized, powerful, rich, and popular.

    Organized, powerful, rich — YES — but never popular – always disgusting.

  53. Anon[131]• 免责声明 说:

    In quarantine to avoid a deadly disease that originated with Jewish ally China, US Whites are currently enjoying a fresh wave of hate from the Jewish owned media.

    White women can’t call the cops on mentally ill and hostile Black men who try to lure their dogs and won’t leave them alone, at minimum.

    Cops get in trouble for the statistical fallout from policing ubiquitous Black criminality. How many cops and civilians died of a result of that criminality this year, to date?

    Lots of Whites will die, in their own nations, as a result of this anti-White hate that is propagated by and originates with Jews.

    The same people work overtime in Israel to frame the jailkeepers and invaders as the victims.

    It’s a special relationship.

    Sort of like that of the spider and its victims.

    • 同意: Robert Dolan
  54. Anon[307]• 免责声明 说:

    they should suppress the speech of Muslims and communists. Since those are the people who hate Jews.

    LOL. Where did you come from? A a dark aprtment in Tel Aviv?

    Islam is nothing but Judaism. There is nothing within Islam that is not Jewish. It is merely Judaism dumbed down and with a shot of testosterone to be more palpable to brown people. Islam is a tool of Judaism, and that is how and why it was founded. Jews prefer Muslims over Christians for very specific reasons that center around both theological and political goal alignment.

    What Jews and Arabs cook up in regard to official Islamic statements on Jews is immaterial. Only a fool would care what comes out of any of their mouths at any time. It is all deception. There is no speaking in this game that means a single thing beyond what is written in the Jewish “religious” books. There is only observation of historical and modern action.

    Communism was literally invented by, run by, and is today primarily promoted by Jews. Judaism’s connection to communism is much more obvious than even its connection to Islam.

    Communism is merely a formalized version of the World gentile slave state that Jews promote in their books. Which is fully obvious.

    Only an ignorant gentile would allow himself to believe that communism is not Jewish and hates Jews. No adult Jew would ever believe such a falsehood.

    • 回复: @Druid
  55. Wally 说:


  56. Anon[356]• 免责声明 说:

    It sounds like some Jews said “optics be damned” and had a bad idea on a Jewish message board toward claiming train seats.

    Ethnic insularity will skew judgement like that, and they underestimate the Jewdar of gentile NYers. Not that you would have needed it on that platform. Groupings of unrelated NY Jewish men tend to look like a reunion of brothers. Exemplary racism will do that.

    They are not all powerful gods, but do believe that they are.

    There are also specific, hidden reasons that they have always been given a place in our societies.

    I can guess as to what they are but likely couldn’t guess as to all of it.


    How far back does the relationship go, and what is hidden in history and what can we learn from it? For example, what was the Jewish role both as adversaries of and functionaries within the Roman Republic? As close cousins of the Carthaginians? Did they play a role in the undermining of the Roman Kingdom to form the Republic?

    Were they present at the first incursion of neolithic farmers into Northern Europe?


    There is a lot more to this tolerance of obvious enemies of society than meets the eye. And its not their claimed science accomplishments. If everyone were to go home with each other’s accomplishments they’d barely be doing better than living in cabins and riding camels.

    • 回复: @Anonymous
  57. It’s the same playbook, one hundred years later. Upon achieving power in the Red revolution in Russia, the crime of antisemitism was made punishable by summary execution. Not even a show trial. Now they are working to pave the way for that here, for when a marxist state is achieved where a republic once stood. And despite their contempt for him, dumb Donald is helping them right along.

  58. Anonymous[230]• 免责声明 说:
    @Pop Warner

    This is why they pay Sean Hannity \$40 million a year, and yet the fools who follow his show don’t have a clue that this doppelgänger of Lou Costello playing Bud Abbott’s toadying fool to Jews posing as neutral experts almost exactly parallels grinning Jewish mockery of the parallel relationship between America’s conservatives and the Jewish authors of their thoughts. This sort of ignorance is morally culpable because it derives from cowardly fear of the Jews and yet, following Hannity’s groveling example, has the audacity to pass itself off as based on principle.

    • 回复: @anarchyst
    , @lavoisier
  59. anarchyst 说:

    You are correct about Hannity being a shill for israel.
    Listening to his radio show, a caller asked him about the deliberate israeli attack on the USS Liberty (GTR-5) on 8 June 1967.
    Hannity abruptly cut the caller off and declared that “israel is our friend and ally and would never have done such a thing”. I damn near fell out of my chair when I heard THAT…

    • 回复: @Anonymous
  60. Anonymous[230]• 免责声明 说:

    Very interesting points you should expand on when you have the chance. As for science, a German physicist, Alexander Unsicker, has demolished their turning physics into some sort of kabbalistic voodoo in his Bankrupting Physics. The way it works is itself grinning mockery of the fools funding them inasmuch as inexplicable detector anomalies are given names as if they were discoveries of new particles, wild errors are erased with now dozens of “free parameters,” and yet the Nobel Prizes and big money flow into their accounts. Unsicker, however, is totally bamboozled by the biggest fraud of them all, Einstein—at least according to the latter’s contemporaries. Biology, for its part, has been weaponized by (mainly) the Jews to destroy Western Civilization as well. Such fine people.

  61. Anonymous[230]• 免责声明 说:

    Imagine what it takes to lose so much of your manhood you betray your country the way he does. He’s also probably the one person in America most responsible for recruiting American boys (and some girls) to die, be maimed, and come home to commit suicide after fighting Israel’s wars so good Jewish boys need not. Possibly a million Arabs have been murdered, mainly by incineration, thousands of young amputees seen at our VA hospitals, and yet this crud dares to pretend he’s the champion of freedom and the disabled veteran’s friend.

    • 同意: FLgeezer, anarchyst
  62. lavoisier 说:

    Fredo Hannity is a disgrace.

    I have just not been able to figure out if his groveling to all things Jewish is primarily due to his being an intellectual lightweight or because of the shekels. I suspect both. The man is a servant to Zion.

  63. @sally

    It’s an excellent presentation. Thanks for the lesson.

  64. @SolontoCroesus

    At least the blacks are rising against the police state (or should I say expressing their displeasure with it in action). What’s everyone else doing except complaining about the police state? And no doubt condemning the blacks for not acting like obedient sheep and keeping their protests to writing endless comments on UR about increasing police powers and the totalitarian police state that is out to get us all.

    • 回复: @Robert Dolan
  65. @Commentator Mike


    The feral negroes are not “protesting” anything……..they simply like to riot and loot and get free TV’s and liquor.

    • 同意: Sick of Orcs
    • 回复: @Commentator Mike
    , @Wally
  66. Derer 说:

    Mandela’s struggle in South Africa is a piece of cake in comparison to the aboriginal Palestinians struggle against the racist religious state of Israel. The sinister players in Washington are despicable hypocrites supporting that regime. Time has come for a national referendum on reversing our shameful use of taxpayers money.

  67. Dawn 说:

    About the tactics of Jews that virtually no one understands:

    The most brilliant documentation, meticulous research and cautionary tale for the present time is the book by Alison Weir.

    “Against Our Better Judgment,

    The Hidden History of How the US was Used to Create Israel”

    You will understand in detail the organizational hive mentality and the utter lack of morality by which these people operate.

    The other take away that I personally realized is that Irgun is alive and well in America today.

    Any white man who was/is a victim of Jewish lies in the CVille legal maneuvers is a victim of Irgun strategy.

    They will burn you to the ground without blinking an eye.

    Their capability for chilling deception is difficult for straight forward white men to imagine.

    The other book of interest is:

    From Yahweh to Zion by Laurent Guyenot

    He traces the history of the Old Testament and makes the case that psychopathy is baked into the genetic code of Jews as a people.

    It’s a long book but very compelling.

    An essay on the subject is on Unz:


    • 谢谢: mark green
    • 回复: @Desert Fox
  68. @Robert Dolan

    Sure there’s that as well, and their lack of organisation won’t lead to much. Also I’m sure there are police provocateurs and agitators mixed in there with the arsonists as after all the looted businesses want to collect the insurance and they’ll certainly claim they had more stock in the burned out buildings than they actually did. This is how it goes. But I get tired reading commenters repeating the same day in day out about the police state and nobody doing anything about it. Okay, so police brutality is just an excuse for them to loot, but it’s still a kind of protest in their own way. Now this emergency situation and the rising unemployment has impoverished a lot of people so a bit of looking by anybody could be justified. But the only legalised looting going on is by the fat cats on the top getting billions in hardship compensation for the emergency, and looting some more on top of that by buying up whatever has lost value and is going dirt cheap with that money the government is handing out. Now that’s what’s really sick.

  69. Desert Fox 说:

    其他好书是道格拉斯·里德(Douglas Reed)的《锡安之争》(The Controversy of Zion)和维克多·奥斯特洛夫斯基(Victor Ostrovsky)的《欺骗之道》(By Way of Deception)和琼·梅伦(Joan Mellen)的《水中之血》(Blood in the Water),都可以在亚马逊上找到。

    • 回复: @CBTerry
  70. @Lot

    You’re wrong about the popular part. BDS has grassroots support and anti-BDS does not. Listen to the conference, they admit it themselves.

  71. Druid 说:

    LOL, you disingenuous POS zio. You jews are the communists. You, like all your satanic brethren, are still trying to blame the Muslims for all your shenanigans. Do you think anyone believes the likes you, A123, Aaron B, Fran Tubman, etc. go steal a few more shekels, you dope!

  72. Free speech is how people find out about Jews Jews will always suppress it when they cannot control it. or edit it as they did before the Internet

  73. Druid 说:

    Islam is little like Judaism. Shows you don’t know Islam and the difference

    • 回复: @James Forrestal
  74. Wally 说:
    @Robert Dolan

    And of course after the arson & looting they will turn around and whine about not having any stores in their neighborhoods … while they say nothing of their massive murders & violence against whites

    The facts are the facts:

    In every place where blacks & browns are in any numbers we see:



    • 同意: Sick of Orcs
  75. @Wally


    I agree with that too. Mostly their own fault but not entirely. Many of the so-called “deplorable” whites at the bottom of society are much in the same situation – maybe not with the “massive” qualifier just yet. Well, what has Trump had to say about these riots?

    • 回复: @Wally
  76. @Wally

    And yet the bulk of Whites still worship these throwbacks. (((They))) do a great job propagandizing, making the dumb fucking masses think piles of excrement are fudge brownies.

  77. @Tom

    Agreed. Blanket condemnation is a non-starter, and it’s simply not possible every last Jew is a shitlib communist, just like that black district in 2012 where there wasn’t a single vote cast for Shit Romney.

    这是一个很好的专栏。 我们现在有我们大多数人以前从未听说过的名字。

  78. Wally 说:
    @Commentator Mike

    Hi Mike, some observations:

    – Aside from the mindless & pathetic black wannabes, aka: Antifa, I’m not seeing much white looting & burning.

    – This latest round of rioting & looting has more the look of juvenile theater than serious protest. A whole lot of selfies and posing. A rain shower and it’s all over.

    – And just look at the pathetic Minneapolis police, doing almost nothing and then they let their own station get trashed.

    – Such a lack of proverbial ‘law & order’ plays right into Trump’s hand.

    Donald Trump: Rioting ‘Thugs’ Dishonor George Floyd; ‘When the Looting Starts the Shooting Starts’

    • 谢谢: Commentator Mike
  79. Tom 说:

    You made some powerful points regarding “hate” as a personal right as long as it doesn’t spill over into violence. But I have a problem with incendiary propaganda in that regard. How does one draw the line? Who gave the command that some are allowed to hate, (blacks for example) while others are not.(straight white goy males, for example), I wonder who? Could it possibly be those Critical Theory Scum-of-the-earth-aliens-from-hell? Of course, the goyim are doomed to a silent cultural servitude, at the rate we’re going. I have a feeling we’re entering the Biblical End Times.

  80. They, the small hats, have centuries of experience in the art of creating enemies where few exist. An argument can be made that the war they dream of is Biblical. People such as Sifry and Spitalnek should have their names, information and ideas published and shared often, as they are a danger to society.

  81. @Exile

    You’re speaking of the neocons. Who are neither conservatives, new or patriots. They are, aside from an occasional token goy, dual citizen Israeli.

  82. @Beavertales

    You have a point. Turn the tables on them. Take them to court as often as we can. The only way to hurt them, is in the pocket.

  83. CBTerry 说:
    @Desert Fox

    请务必阅读 Ron Unz 关于摩萨德暗杀的美国真理报文章。

    Unz 对维克多·奥斯特洛夫斯基 (Victor Ostrovsky) 被忽视的第二本书《欺骗的另一面》(The Others Side of Deception) 说了很多有趣的话。 (如果可能的话,我还鼓励人们尝试从您当地的经销商那里订购书籍,而不是亚马逊。)

  84. pill 说:

    Jews’ scientific contributions come down to their having profited from German education in the nineteenth century, when, due to their business practices, they joined – and were beginning to dominate? – the elite. And then spreading the pratice to other countries, where they set up strategic political and economic ‘leverage’. Has any Jew ever acknowledged that? When German soldiers returned from WWI, the Jews had the jobs.

  85. @Druid

    Islam is little like Judaism.


    Just out of curiosity, does this comically-inaccurate claim stem from sheer ignorance on your part… or is it deliberate prevarication? Just in case it’s the former, here’s a good review of some of the many beliefs, traditions, rituals, taboos, etc. that are shared as part of the common judeo-islamic heritage:

    Similarities between judaism and islam

    让我们看看 “My jewish Learning” 不得不说:

    “伊斯兰教像基督教一样,接受犹太圣经,并且主要基于犹太思想和传统。 The philosophical underpinnings of Islam, however, are more closely aligned with those of Judaism设立的区域办事处外,我们在美国也开设了办事处,以便我们为当地客户提供更多的支持。“

  86. @Wally

    I missed not that much. The holoco\$t can be believed or not, but when their lawyers makes it a crime not to believe, THERE is the power…
    As for their “most powerful weapon”? I am starting to believe their success at making us believe in the existence of their god was their greatest feat so far… So many things they get away with, since they have given us a forgiving messiah sitting at the right hand of a vengeful god overflowing everything with his hallowed spirits.

  87. @VinnyVette

    Vinny, follow the link. There is one at the top of all my comments. Before you knee-jerk your disapproval for my “weak support”. You have no support from me at all, until you can come up with better arguments than attacking on personal perceptions based on one or two paragraphs. Remember, DARPA owns the internet, and they have recorded every single word of yours that can be twisted into an admission of incitement against…. whomever can pay to drag you before a court of independent jurors. Get off the violence, boy!

  88. anarchyst 说:

    It goes further than that…the so-called “separation of church and state”…
    Observe the jewish “push” to get Christian symbology removed from “the public square”. Jewish groups have been successful in their moves to marginalize Christianity, getting Christian displays removed from “the public square, citing the “separation of church and state”, especially during Christian holidays.
    Fast forward to the past ten years or so…
    During jewish holidays, menorahs crop up on public property like weeds, the “public square” so to speak, and there are no protests citing the “separation of church and state”.
    Even the White House has been infected with displays of jewish menorahs…



 记得 我的信息为什么?
提交的评论已被许可给 Unz评论 并可以由后者自行决定在其他地方重新发布
通过RSS订阅此评论主题 通过RSS订阅所有Eric Striker评论