Unz评论•另类媒体选择$
美国主流媒体大都排除了有趣,重要和有争议的观点
 博客浏览吉拉德·阿兹蒙(Gilad Atzmon)档案
丑闻:一个贫穷的劳动委员会花了136.000英镑来阻止我玩萨克斯舞并得到圣诞老人

书签 全部切换总目录添加到图书馆从图书馆中删除 • B
显示评论下一个新评论下一个新回复了解更多
回复同意/不同意/等等 更多... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
同意不同意谢谢LOL轮唱
这些按钮可将您的公开协议,异议,感谢,LOL或巨魔与所选注释一起注册。 仅对最近使用“记住我的信息”复选框保存姓名和电子邮件的频繁评论者可用,并且在任何八个小时的时间内也只能使用三次。
忽略评论者 关注评论者
搜寻文字 区分大小写  确切的词  包括评论
列表 书签

The corrupted Islington Labour Council has disclosed that it spent the staggering amount of £136.000 on legal fees in its efforts to stop me from playing sax with the Blockheads at a Christmas concert.

Islington Labour council claims to be impoverished, as a result it has evicted disabled people, it struggles with housing and can’t find the necessary cash to feed impoverished kids in school. Instead they used the £136.000 of the taxpayers’ money to try to interfere with the arts, freedom of expression and a Christmas musical celebration. If this story doesn’t become a huge scandal, Britain is a free place no more.

£136.000 could provide a roof for more than 270 disabled and homeless people for a month…

背景:

On 3 December, Islington Council received 一封电子邮件Likud Uk Director Martin Rankoff. Rankoff claimed to be so upset by my appearance at a council venue that he would be forced not to attend. Council leader 理查德·沃茨 took immediate action. In an email to Rankoff he vowed to prevent me from appearing with the Blockheads. On the 4th the Council sent a letter to the Band informing them that they had to remove me from the concert or face a cancelation. The Band was indignant that the Council was interfering with their performance and published a very 有力的声明 opposing the Council’s demand. I hired a legal team to help me fight the Council’s autocratic demand.

On its part, the bankrupt Council hired the 辛金斯 law firm. Simkins, already one of Britain’s most expensive legal firms, deployed two partners for the task of stopping me playing the sax. Not surprisingly, one of these partners had represented ultra Zionist tycoon Sheldon Adelson, a benefactor of both President Trump and Likud leader Bibi Netanyahu.

A few days before the concert, I publicised the matter, having decided that the public deserved to know how their Council was spending its time and their money. And I was determined to expose the troubling collusion between the Labour Council and Likud UK.

请愿书 expressing disgust with the Council was launched and quickly gathered almost 7000 signatures, but the Council refused to employ common sense. Thousands off complaints were filed with the council. But the Labour council preferred to listen to UK Likud Director. I was told that the Council was spending tens of thousands of pounds on legal fees to justify its unlawful act. Some of my supporters filed Freedom of Information requests to find out how much Cllr Watts’ ‘decision’ cost Islington’s residents.

I thought there had been an outlandish waste of £40-60.000. Today, through the Freedom of Information replies, we learned that the corrupted Labour politicians spent three times that amount. And in response to a request for an explanation of the Council’s actions, the Labour councillors showed that they were not even brave enough to take responsibility for their own wasteful and absurd actions. Their claim was that the Council’s employees had been the decision makers. “The operative decision to ban Mr Atzmon was not taken by a councillor. Rather, the decision was taken by Martin Bevis, Assistant Director Financial Operations and Customer Service, and that decision was upheld on appeal by Ian Adams, Director Financial Operations and Customer Services.”

It seems unlikely that Martin Bevis and Ian Adams were the decision makers. If they were, the Council should explain how it managed to spend a six figure sum on lawyers.

The message to peace loving Brits is clear, despite our love for Corbyn: the Labour party, in its current form, is a cancerous rotten collective. Not only is it unqualified to lead, its proximity to government puts the future of Britain as a free society at a grave risk.

立即订购

My friend, Iranian American author Negar Azizmoradi, gives us this parable. A frog thrown into a pot of boiling water will immediately jump out but a frog placed in a pot of cold water that is slowly heated to a boil will not save itself. It will be cooked to death. Brits, like Americans, the French and other westerners have been steamed for a while. Corbyn has been submerged in the heating water for the last three years. We are running out of the time to jump out. If we don’t put this madness to an end, we’re all going to end up as rotting corpses in a chicken soup.

But this story has a good ending. while Islington council was quick to waste its residents’ tax money on lawyers I managed to channel my art through Santa Claus, probably my best student ever.

My battle for truth and freedom involves some expensive legal services. I hope that you will consider committing to a monthly donation in whatever amount you can give. Regular contributions will enable me to avoid being pushed against a wall and to stay on top of the endless harassment by Zionist operators attempting to silence me.

(从重新发布 吉拉德·阿兹蒙 经作者或代表的许可)
 
• 类别: 对外政策 •标签: 英国, 以色列大堂 
隐藏16条评论发表评论
忽略评论者...跟随Endorsed Only
修剪评论?
    []
  1. Ronnie 说:

    它是 136,000 磅而不是 136.000。 请更正此问题。

    • 回复: @Charlie
  2. Matthew 说:

    这确实令人印象深刻。消除人们因拥有不同想法而感到内疚是身份政治中不宽容的左派堕落的惯用手法

    • 回复: @Gilad Atzmon
  3. Be fair. You wouldn’t accuse Ukranian Trawniki men of responsibility for the Holocaust. None of this was carried out on the initiative of the Islington councillors. They were just doing as they were told — and no doubt the consequences would have been swift and unpleasant if they had refused.

  4. anonymous[191]• 免责声明 说:

    I honestly think that Britain is under tighter control of the Zionist entity than the United States. At least the US still has some wiggling room because its constitution hasn’t been completely compromised yet. Britain however, seems to give them whatever they want, unquestioningly.

  5. @Matthew

    Totally…. it is a lot of fun to expose these nutters ….

  6. @anonymous

    Britain is an occupied zone,,, and America isn’t that different …

    • 回复: @Rabbitnexus
  7. What, Jewish Zio-fascists can’t afford to hire their own lawyers to silence their critics? Sad!

    • 回复: @Gilad Atzmon
    , @dimples
  8. @anonymous

    France, too! In America, Blacks are allowed to criticize Jews (Farrakhan, Sharpton.) In France, no. Dieudonne was fined and his shows canceled for his impudence in mocking mandatory Holocaust education.

  9. Charlie 说:
    @Ronnie

    它是 136,000 磅而不是 136.000。

    是的,请为我们的美国观众纠正这个问题,尽管即使是我的腊肠犬,她一生都在加利福尼亚生活,也知道逗号和点以及点和逗号之间的区别。

  10. Clyde 说:

    Atzmon you are a loon but why would anyone care where and when you play your sax/ So petty and stupid.

  11. Anonymous [AKA "Rehab"] 说: • 您的网站

    The well outstanding informative post you have shared on this page about the stop-me-from-playing-sax-and-got-santa-claus-instead because It has evicted disabled people, it struggles with housing and can’t find the necessary cash to feed impoverished kids in school. Instead they used the £136.000 of the taxpayers’ money to try to interfere with the arts, freedom of expression and a Christmas musical celebration. If this story doesn’t become a huge scandal, Britain is a free place no more.
    谢谢。

  12. My friend, Iranian American author

    Which is he? You cannot be both Iranian and American. Pick one.

    • 回复: @Colin Wright
  13. dimples 说:
    @Fidelios Automata

    Well obviously the Jewish Zio-Fascists, although undoubtedly loaded, were smart enough to get some other suckers to spend the dosh. Did you expect anything else?

  14. @Chris Mallory

    ‘Which is he? You cannot be both Iranian and American. Pick one.’

    Why not? I’d describe Frank next door as Italian American.

当前评论者
说:

发表评论-对超过两周的文章发表评论,将在质量和语气上进行更严格的判断


 记得 我的信息为什么?
 电子邮件回复我的评论
$
提交的评论已被许可给 Unz评论 并可以由后者自行决定在其他地方重新发布
在翻译模式下禁用评论
通过RSS订阅此评论主题 通过RSS订阅所有Gilad Atzmon的评论