Unz评论•另类媒体选择$
美国主流媒体大都排除了有趣,重要和有争议的观点
 博客浏览纪尧姆·杜罗彻(Guillaume Durocher)档案
“大母亲”:男人和女人的衰落。 。 。 讲真话
赫芬顿邮报 编辑人员,大约 2016 年

书签 全部切换总目录添加到图书馆从图书馆中删除 • B
显示评论下一个新评论下一个新回复了解更多
回复同意/不同意/等等 更多... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
同意不同意谢谢LOL轮唱
这些按钮可将您的公开协议,异议,感谢,LOL或巨魔与所选注释一起注册。 仅对最近使用“记住我的信息”复选框保存姓名和电子邮件的频繁评论者可用,并且在任何八个小时的时间内也只能使用三次。
忽略评论者 关注评论者
搜寻文字 区分大小写  确切的词  包括评论
列表 书签

现代社会,尤其是当代西方社会变革的速度如此之快,以至于我们都容易感到有些失落。

最近的一个例子就是希拉里·克林顿(Hillary Clinton)提供的,他是全球寡头政治最“进步”的代表。 你看,71 岁的克林顿,其总统竞选的前提是创造历史,成为第一位女性总统,但仍然相信生理性别:

在接受记者采访时 “星期日泰晤士报”, 记者德卡·艾特肯黑德问克林顿夫妇是否有胡子和阴茎的人可以成为女人,切尔西强调回答说:“是的。”

然而,正如艾特肯黑德所描述的那样,希拉里看起来“不安”,并指责代沟不那么容易接受。

'错误。 我只是在了解这一点,”希拉里回应道。 '这是一个非常大的代际讨论,因为这不是我长大或见过的东西。 需要更多的时间和精力来理解以不同的方式定义自己意味着什么。

希拉里在这个话题上的扭扭捏捏,让那些满嘴脏话的漫画家们看得见笑了。 每日斯托默. 与此同时,她的女儿切尔西也认为,自称是女性的男性拥有参加女子运动的人权。

这类发展有一些真正超现实的东西。 一个人想知道从哪里开始。

这种疯狂已经很久了。 事实是,至少在过去的两个世纪里,西方文明一直在稳步女性化。 男性的衰落已成为主流媒体边缘的话题。 男性的衰落同时发生在生物学、经济、社会和道德方面。

见证睾酮水平:

精子数量:

收入:

在西欧,通过使用有利于女性的配额来系统化男性的衰落。 2000 年 50 月,法国投票通过了一项法律,要求政党必须有 40% 的女性候选人。 今天,欧盟委员会的既定目标是至少有 40% 的女性经理,这个目标只能通过在晋升中系统地歧视男性来实现。 欧盟希望对欧洲上市公司实施类似的法定配额,在所有公司董事会中拥有 XNUMX% 的女性。 这也适用于技术和科学等领域,女性申请者很少。

冒着让人们气馁的风险,我认为我们应该永远现实,我相信男人的衰落 尚未见底. 当然,在西欧,驱逐过剩的“50 岁以上白人男性”——在法国很常见的一句话——的过程还没有完成。 虽然在美国有一定的保护措施,但我怀疑“觉醒的资本”和虔诚的人力资源部门会以两性平等结果的名义,在歧视男性方面变得更加激进,这本身就倾向于等同于机会平等。

女性占主导地位并非没有自由和卓越的后果。 2015 年皮尤民意调查发现 女性支持政府审查的可能性高出近 50% “冒犯少数群体的言论”比男性多。 女性,尤其是左翼女性,在政治上更加不宽容:一项调查发现, 30% 的民主党女性曾阻止、取消好友或停止在线关注某人的政治,而只有 8% 的共和党男性。 伦敦 2016 年 XNUMX 月报道称 女学生绝大多数支持对大学出版物的审查 如果这些“被认为是对某些群体的冒犯”。

自然,任何数量的 真实 陈述可能令人痛苦或“被认为冒犯某些群体”。 最尖锐的是,任何关于男性和女性存在有意义的生理和心理差异,因此在某种程度上应该具有不同社会角色的建议,都将被视为“冒犯”。

这凸显了西方社会女性化的自我强化性质。

在我们的社会中,任何关于性别平等和性别正确角色的理性和基于事实的讨论都是不可能的。 这是不可能的,因为我们甚至无法让自己认识到生理性别的现实——因此,让男性对女性变性人参与并因此主导女性运动的疯狂行为越来越普遍。 面对这种疯狂,我们所有的祖传智慧和现代科学——更不用说我自己的涂鸦——都毫无用处:没有帮助那些太不诚实或太懦弱的人看不到自己鼻子前的东西。

然而,为了我们年轻的白人男孩——他们已经因为不可避免地无法实现平等而成为替罪羊,他们需要在社会中以自豪和自信的人的身份占据一席之地——我将简要介绍性别差异以及什么性别关系可能看起来像一个健康的社会。

生物性别差异超出了单纯的生殖器官,称为 性二态性,是动物王国的常态。 这反映了男性和女性不同的进化策略。 根据特定物种对雄性和雌性的不同进化策略,几乎所有可以想象的差异都是可能的。 通常,虽然默认情况下雌性会携带和(如适用)养育后代,但雄性更具竞争力,必须以某种方式证明自己才能获得雌性的认可; 无论这意味着公羊互相攻击角,还是鸟类准备优雅的巢穴或炫耀它们壮观的羽毛。 (参见大卫·阿滕伯勒(David Attenborough)的无数自然纪录片,这些纪录片通常归结为动物努力获取食物,而不是被吃掉,然后寻找伴侣。)

性二态性可以是不存在的或极端的。 以深海琵琶鱼为例,小雄性咬住雌性并逐渐与她融合,直到只剩下 一对附在雌性身体上的性腺. 到目前为止,还没有任何琵琶鱼“男性主义运动”来主张雄性和雌性琵琶鱼的互换性和平等权利。

男性和女性之间的差异当然没有男性和女性琵琶鱼之间的差异那么严重,但它们也不容忽视。 简而言之:男人是 竞争的 并通过以下方式实现其最高的繁殖潜力 征服, 而女性 两厢情愿 并通过以下方式实现其最高的繁殖潜力 培育. 一个成功的男人可能有 几十个甚至几百个孩子,即使对于最成功的女性来说,这在生物学上也是不可能的。 男性的进化策略是高风险、高回报。 女性是低风险、低回报的。

一个成功的男人会与其他男人进行集体斗争 抢占资源, 至 建立, 至 通过各种方式找到,而一个成功的女人会 从她的男人那里获得资源! 大自然为女性提供了所有的心理特征和情感技能来做到这一点。 一个男人会被一个健康、美丽的女人所吸引。 一个女人被一个在社会上成功、有声望、有钱的男人所吸引,这个男人既是一个提供者又是一个坏男孩(她对此感到非常痛苦),以便养活她并保护她。 因此,媒体纷纷报道,男性经济衰退是一场悲剧。 . . 为了 女性的婚姻前景!

在史前部落,一个成功的人会花很多时间锻炼自己,狩猎动物或与其他人交战,作为人类联盟的一部分。 妇女在成年后的大部分时间都在家里度过,怀孕或照顾小孩。 适合这两种生活方式的心理特征当然大不相同。

如果你曾经参与过任何形式的身体困难的集体活动——比如说你带着所有的家具搬到另一个家——你通常会发现男人和女人都恢复了他们的传统角色。 男人会从字面上看 做繁重的工作 和建造家具,而女性则负责清洁、做饭和提供精神支持(其价值不可低估)。

女人似乎也很自然 社会价值观的执行者. 虽然历史上男性控制着神职人员和媒体,但它是 女性唠叨他们的男人 不辜负社会既定的社会规范和 受人尊敬. (毫无疑问,同性恋者之所以在极右翼变得如此突出,因为后者已经成为异端,这无疑是部分原因。)据说如果斯巴达妇女逃离战斗,他们会谋杀自己的儿子,而谋杀的是拜占庭妇女奉命摧毁基督教圣像的士兵。 今天在整个欧洲,你会发现老妇人几乎是唯一留在乡村教堂的人。

随着我们变得舒适,我们的社会和文化也变得女性化和幼稚化。 今天,女性似乎将她们的母性本能投射到世界上所有被认可的“受害者群体”身上:同性恋者、移民和少数族裔都是她们象征性的替代孩子。 不限 那些不将这些群体视为与抚养异性恋儿童的欧洲家庭“平等”的措施——即使对共同利益有益——则被认为仅仅是恶毒的“欺凌”。 在美国, 白人民主党妇女 即使需要歧视,也推动了大部分转向要求他们获得平等的种族结果。

在我看来,继亚里士多德和达尔文之后,人类伦理必须建立在人性之上。 人类是社会性的和潜在的理性生物,他们通过连续几代人的创造而存在,并传递遗传特征。 就男性和女性在生物学上的差异而言,这可能意味着,在伦理上,他们应该有不同的社会角色,以促进最大的个人和集体人类繁荣。

其中最明显的是 兵役. 男人的身体比女人强壮得多,社会总是 歧视男性,要求她们在军队服役,而妇女则留在家里安全。 (好莱坞还没有试图展示坚强、独立的黑人女性对诺曼底登陆成功的核心作用,但还有时间。)女性留在家里照顾孩子的社会期望与这个。 在某种程度上,为了物种的利益,一个组织最优化的物种将在性方面发挥特殊作用。

斯巴达人、阿兹特克人和墨索里尼都同意:分娩——可能是当今典型后现代人可能生活的最激烈的经历——对女性来说就像战争对男性一样。 因此,男性权威在同一时期完全崩溃可能并非巧合 和平 在我们的土地上取得了胜利。

甚至在几代以前,我们的祖父每天都必须表现出每天的英雄主义:在田间、矿山、渔船上或军队中工作,风雨无阻。 通过这种努力,他们获得了家庭的生计和自己的父权,更不用说他们天生的坚韧。

1914 年,西方国家主宰世界,白人可能占全球人口的三分之一。 从那以后,西方国家一直在急剧衰落,西方人自己将在几十年内成为他们历史悠久的家园的少数群体。 现在这是一个历史性的逆转! 这些事态发展恰逢民主化,特别是女性选举权。

认为女性追求不那么必要和光荣,或者女性历来无能为力的想法,是对女性的粗俗的女权主义诽谤。

我相当怀疑女性化的过程是否可以逆转,至少在短期内是这样。 我什至不认为它有 见顶 然而。 事情在好转之前会变得更糟。 但这不应该让你气馁。

一方面,在个人层面上,当前这一代人的普遍女性气质会让年轻人更容易发光,只需付出一点努力。 正如它所写的 叶隐:“现在很多男人似乎都有女人的脉搏。 很少有人能被认为是一个真正的男人。 这意味着一个人只要付出一点点努力就可以超越其他人。” 锻炼身体,赚钱,组建团队,敢于有一些理智,你就会茁壮成长。

西方历史以颓废和重生为标志。 对于古老的异教徒来说,基督教的兴起是一场灾难。 然而,通过尝试重置时钟并没有发生更新。 深思熟虑和热心的哲学家-皇帝朱利安恢复多神教的计划以惨败告终。 重生是随着中世纪日耳曼化形式的基督教的兴起而出现的,为十字军东征奠定了基础。 夺回 西班牙,以及欧洲征服世界大部分地区。 同样,托克维尔在 XNUMX 世纪非常现实,他知道“民主”(意指大众时代)是不可避免的。 等级制度和某种贵族制度只能在 XNUMX 世纪以后以一种非常不同的形式回归。 所以我相信女性化是有道理的:我们的生活方式意味着这不会改变。 我什至对东欧人或中国人都不是特别乐观——我怀疑后者的人一旦与我们的生活方式匹配,就会崩溃。 但这并不妨碍更新。 . . 我们必须适应,创造新的形式,要有创造力。 . . 年轻人将不得不挺身而出迎接挑战。

 
• 类别: 思想 •标签: 美国媒体, 女权主义, 政治上的正确 
隐藏410条评论发表评论
忽略评论者...跟随Endorsed Only
修剪评论?
    []
  1. AaronB 说:

    你的最后一段特别重要。

    当你对抗强大的潮流时,你是最弱的,当你顺其自然时,你是最强大的,然后按照你的愿望塑造它们。

    与基督教作斗争是行不通的。 但最终,基督教变成了人们想要的任何东西。 在文艺复兴时期,正如尼采所说,基督教甚至变成了异教。 朱利安试图通过正面对抗基督教而失败的事情,发生在与基督教同行的过程中。

    而今天,像 Vox Day 和 Bruce Charlton 这样的思想家只是简单地利用基督教来做任何他们想要的。

    现代趋势也是如此——服从并顺应它们,然后你将能够影响潮流——最终,也许,完全重新命名它。

    这是老道家的原则——顺应强大的力量,潜移默化地影响它的方向,正面对抗只会导致毁灭和失败。

    你不能与时代精神正面对抗。 你会失败。

    我认为每个商业或任何其他领域的成功人士都明白需要与强大的负面趋势合作,以帮助塑造它们而不是对抗它们。

    不能像水一样流动的僵硬、不屈不挠的人,总是、总是、总是失败。

    因此,正面对抗和顽固不屈抵抗的另类右翼计划是愚蠢的,注定要失败。 这在历史上从来没有成功过。

    但那些微妙、适应性强、聪明的另类右翼人士在哪里呢? 到目前为止,为什么这样的人这么少? 他们为什么这么蠢?

  2. 这是最近一段关于广告的视频,其中[显然]男孩说[不,我不是编造的! ]:

    ” 嘿爸爸,我想我得到了 我的例假” !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    问候 [???],onebornfree

    • 回复: @Alfred
  3. 安·库尔特(Ann Coulter)恰好是一个没有胡须或阴茎的女人,她同意 峰值愚蠢 妇女根本不应该被赋予投票权。这种性别扭曲的胡言乱语仍然被大多数人认为是愚蠢的。然而,多年来对人权的缺乏理解和对社会主义的支持所造成的损害比这些新的愚蠢的东西要大得多。

    • 回复: @Mike Tre
    , @Peter Harris
  4. @AaronB

    关键是把唤醒运动变成一个圆形的行刑队:

    女权主义者与穆斯林极端主义者
    变性人运动骗子 vs 女权运动
    环保主义者与富人唤醒了碳足迹巨大的人们
    西班牙裔极端分子与黑人极端分子
    多米尼加人 vs 波多黎各人
    有组织的劳工领导与廉价劳工非法移民
    Reconquistas vs 白人 CA 唤醒了人们
    互相审查

    这就是我们乡下人劈木头的方式——用楔子——只要放置得当,只要稍微用力,木头就能劈得相当好。

  5. AaronB 说:
    @AaronB

    这些力量是我们无法控制的,我并不是在建议改变世界的策略。我不想被误解为倡导变革。

    我只是一个观察者,并不想改变世界,并且认为这些事情是不可避免的。 在可预见的未来,也许数百年,觉醒将伴随着我们。 具有不同价值观的人们最好学会适应并找到在这个新环境中茁壮成长的方法。 有可能的。 罗德·德雷尔有一些想法。

    但这也需要一定程度的隐藏。这不是悲剧,而是生活中不可避免的一部分——西班牙的犹太人改宗可以教会我们一些东西。在每种文化中,有些人总是不得不进行隐瞒。

    我更喜欢预测而不是开处方。 最终将会发生的情况是,觉醒文化虽然表面上保留着相同的词语,但最终将表达出完全相反的含义。 这有点像基督教在保留登山宝训的同时,却毫无违和感地意味着征服和帝国主义。

    这就是它的工作原理。 这是一个我们无法控制的过程。

    • 回复: @El Dato
    , @anonymous
    , @Flint Clint
  6. @Justvisiting

    关键是把唤醒运动变成一个圆形的行刑队:

    JV,好主意,但我们必须确保远离圈子。这些人中没有多少人有良好的目标(也许除了老一辈的有组织的劳工领袖)。

    我将用同样的评论来赞扬 Durocher 先生这篇精彩的专栏。我只读过你的其他几本,但我需要跟上。谢谢。

  7. peterAUS 说:

    没有人类的衰落。
    只有西方白人的衰落。甚至在中产阶级中也是如此。

    文章中的内容根本不适用于:
    生活在西方的“少数民族”。
    亚洲人、印度人、东欧人、南美人、非洲人。

    而且,即使对于那些中产阶级以上的白人来说,这也很有效:

    ......在个人层面上,当前这一代人的普遍女性气质将使年轻人更容易发光......。

    ……一个人只要付出一点点努力就可以超越别人。”锻炼、赚钱、组建团队、敢于有理智,你就会蓬勃发展……

    男人/女人的工作达到了社会工程师根本无法达到的水平。聪明人可以轻松地利用这一点。聪明的。

  8. Svevlad 说:

    我看到一个解决方案:

    1. 将所有人员重新安置到驻扎国
    2.苏联现在完全是女性的

    问题解决了!

    • 回复: @Andrei Martyanov
    , @Skeptikal
  9. El Dato 说:

    好莱坞尚未试图展示坚强、独立的黑人女性对诺曼底登陆成功的关键作用,但还有时间。

    “把党卫军骂死!”

    它可能是“La Cinquième Companie”的后续作品。

    • 哈哈: TKK
    • 回复: @TKK
    , @Bill Jones
  10. El Dato 说:
    @AaronB

    西班牙的犹太人皈依者可以告诉我们一些这方面的事情。

    现代世界里不存在这样的事情。

    到处都会有唤醒控制人工智能。你会像温斯顿·史密斯一样,带着思想犯罪扩音器。基本上我们已经到了那个地步,但情况只会变得更糟。

    不,这个问题必须更早地“解决”,可能采取极端措施。

    • 回复: @AaronB
  11. AaronB 说:
    @El Dato

    大多数社会只是想要公众默许。即使是传统的宗教团体也并不真正关心你私下做了什么或你想什么,只要你公开默许即可。

    只要你不是一个试图改变世界的空想家,你就可以在几乎任何体系中做得很好。

    一旦你从试图改变外部世界转向改变自己的态度,社会是什么样子就不再那么重要了,除非有一些极端情况——无论我们喜欢与否,这种情况经常发生。

    自由是内在的,而不是外在的。

  12. 我们没有父权制,因为卑鄙的男人想要压迫女人。它以哈耶克的方式在多个世纪的许多社会中自发地、有机地产生并维持,没有任何中央计划强加它,因为它致力于让人类在一个严酷和危险的世界中生存。

    我在其他地方推测,美国对奴隶制在国家建设中的经济边缘作用重新产生的敌意部分源于白人乍得嫉妒。许多建立美国的白人拥有奴隶,因为他们是高睾酮的坏蛋,他们通常可以毫不费力地吸引那些想嫁给他们并生孩子的白人妇女。被称为“非自愿独身者”的被性驱逐的白人男性的兴起反映了这样一个事实,即我们的现代觉醒意识形态妖魔化了那些使他们的祖先取得成功的男性行为。如果我们社会中的一个白人非独身者生活在另一个社会,在那里他可以购买一些土地和一些黑人来提高他的农场的生产力,他会发现一些有生育能力的白人妇女神秘地认为他是合理的丈夫材料。

  13. 作者给出了很好的概述,但我认为他的历史相似之处是错误的。仅仅是因为现在我们面临着人类历史上前所未有的情况。

    例如,我们知道,强大的社会战胜了弱小的社会,这常常给被征服者带来灾难性的后果。但现在,世界上最强大的社会,欧洲和欧洲衍生的社会,加上东亚,正在让原始的弱者破坏他们自己的社会结构和未来(当然,亚洲人除外)。

    就欧洲而言,移民后的再生是可能的,因为所有群体本质上都属于相同的种族/基因型/表型和文化——白人。另一方面,如果你让完全不同的种族进入你自己的家,要么变得重要,要么更糟,成为社会主导——就没有恢复或再生的可能性。

    所以,总结一下:

    * 非洲人是一个失败的种族/群体,他们无能为力。由于宿主的自杀式愚蠢,它们只能将靠近它们的人打倒。有了它们,人类可能已经死亡或不存在

    *对于穆斯林来说,你有一个落后的历史文明,只有当它不够“伊斯兰”并且闪烁着借来的光芒时,它才会成功。否则,伊斯兰人口“棕色人种”只能坚持一段时间。他们是进步的外星人。他们可能保留了文明生活的元素,但在地区层面上,基本上是停滞不前的。

    * 对于印度教印度人,我怀疑他们与世界范围内的伊斯兰教并没有太大不同(禁忌,仪式,所有愚蠢的东西......)

    * 只有非西方白人和东亚人有进一步发展的潜力。

    但是,西方复兴的先决条件是摆脱普遍人权和联合国创始原则。换句话说,西方世界(以及其他文明的更高层次)的主导思想应该被摒弃。或者,即使不是彻底崩溃,富裕的西方社会的部分崩溃也将造成一个真空,非西方国家(东亚,或许俄罗斯等)将可以自由地忽视平等主义意识形态并采取不适用于它们的行为。

    而且,至少有 3-6 亿人会因为无法养活自己而死去。

    我们不要抱有幻想,认为幸福的结局在某种程度上是不可避免的。来自美洲和美洲的美洲印第安人表明,整个种族几乎可以消失,他们的文化更是如此。

    当然,我不是算命先生。我不知道会发生什么。但是,如果你失去了生存、繁荣和统治的意愿——你就注定失败。当然,这适用于未改良的智人。在这种情况下,我想说,统治和重要的世界将是欧亚北部,其余的世界要么已经死亡,要么正在垂死。

    在其他场景中(第三次世界大战、改造人类……)——这太投机了。

  14. @Justvisiting

    资本与劳动力的斗争将多数人联合起来对抗少数人。一切都是资本的梦遗。这就是我们今天在 Capital 的设计下所处的境地。当工人们互相斗争时,资本家成为寡头,然后成为封建领主。当资本家受到劳动法、反垄断法、移民法和税法的约束时,资本主义可以成为繁荣的引擎。自由主义者的噩梦。然而,监管有利于竞争(小企业),并将资本和工党拉入不需要福利的繁荣中产阶级。

    当不受管制的资本主义演变成封建主义时,无产者就会转向社会主义。更糟糕的自由主义者噩梦。可悲的是,受监管的资本主义需要诚实和开明的治理。现行政权完全腐败。

    节育(避孕药)比投票权更能赋予女性权力。顺境时,女人需要男人,就像鱼需要自行车一样。重置后。在TSHTF之后。现实中将会有困难时期。即使不被欣赏,男人也会再次被需要。重置将推翻华盛顿帝国,为人们提供建立新事物的机会。

    废除/分裂将是前进的方向。
    停止仇恨。 分离。

  15. 女权主义现在是关于复仇的。为什么我们会看到这些野性的自由派(可能单身……)妈妈带着她们的儿子参加变装皇后故事时间和同性恋游行……

    • 回复: @Anonymous
  16. peterAUS 说:
    @advancedatheist

    ……它致力于让人类在严酷而危险的世界中生存下去。

    是的。
    这种世界在西方已经不存在了。尤其是中上阶层以上。
    在世界其他地方仍然如此。

    西方有能力享受其当前宗教的奢侈。
    目前。

    • 回复: @advancedatheist
  17. peterAUS 说:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    差不多了

    话虽如此,也不完全是。特朗普当选和英国脱欧确实表明 东西 其他。

    我确信,如果西方真的存在言论自由,更不用说没有相关法律(例如德国的法律),我们会看到 真实 关于西方白人最多的图片 思考和感受。

    有一个群体确实从这一切中受益,但我觉得即使他们也开始感到不舒服。

    有一种奇特的 动力学 在这一切中,并且可以从这里走任何路。

    • 同意: Commentator Mike
    • 回复: @FLgeezer
  18. @Svevlad

    苏联现在完全是女性吗

    苏联是一个极其男性化的社会。

    • 回复: @AaronB
  19. @peterAUS

    我们的美好时光不会持续太久。加利福尼亚州曾经是地球上物质最发达的地方,这次停电正好符合理查德·C·邓肯(Richard C. Duncan)的奥杜瓦伊理论(Olduvai Theory)的图表。

    • 回复: @Anonymous
  20. AaronB 说:
    @Andrei Martyanov

    苏联是一个极其男性化的社会

    这就是它下跌的原因。过强、过硬、过分不弯曲的东西就无法适应而变得脆弱。

  21. Steve2 说:

    对于那些太不诚实或太懦弱而看不到自己眼皮子底下的事情的人来说,这是没有帮助的。

    在这里插入明显的笑话。

  22. @AaronB

    这就是它下跌的原因。过强、过硬、过分不弯曲的东西就无法适应而变得脆弱。

    现代俄罗斯,一旦忽略了大城市中心的办公室浮游生物,也是一个甚至比苏联更男性化的社会。上次我查了一下俄罗斯文明正处于第二个千年。但你对苏联因男子气概而崩溃的深刻见解已被适当注意到。

    • 回复: @AaronB
  23. Mike Tre [又名“MikeatMikedotMike”] 说:
    @Achmed E. Newman

    如果安·库尔特的行为方式与她的写作一致,她会更有说服力。具体来说,就是结婚生子。这对她的世界观和写作都有好处。

    • 回复: @Achmed E. Newman
  24. @Mike Tre

    我确实知道她没有结婚,也没有孩子,迈克,但从来没有真正关注过她的个人生活。我所知道的是,就写出真相而言,她的得分约为 980(据我所知)。那 2% 是平权行动,还有一两栏是关于底池的。

    我想她有了孩子会让她的写作变得更好。米歇尔·马尔金(Michelle Malkin)确实拥有这方面的知识,并且她从中得到了很多关于 Big-Ed BS 的专栏。

    • 不同意: Peter Harris
    • 回复: @Mike Tre
    , @Achmed E. Newman
  25. AaronB 说:
    @Andrei Martyanov

    俄罗斯文化一直被认为具有女性特质,更倾向于女性化的东方,更符合情感、灵魂和精神,所有女性特质。俄罗斯男人明显比西方男人更温柔、更可爱——当他们不是低等的野蛮人时。

    矛盾的是,这实际上意味着男人可以更自由地表现出男子气概。在亚洲也是如此,整体氛围更加女性化,但男性气质受到尊重,男性并不被女性所支配。

    在极其男性化的西方,对自然、技术和逻辑的控制优先于女性的直觉、情感和灵魂,女性具有男性气概并主宰男性。

    矛盾的是,当你整合女性气质时,你就可以变得男性化。当你压抑女性气质时,你的男性气质就会变成它的对立面。

    这是一条古老的法则——你试图压制的自然的一面会以报复的方式卷土重来。任何事物推向极端都会变成它的对立面。

  26. @WorkingClass

    节育(避孕药)比投票权更能赋予女性权力。

    好点,就在那里。

    顺境时,女人需要男人,就像鱼需要自行车一样。重置后。在TSHTF之后。现实中将会有困难时期。即使不被欣赏,男人也会再次被需要。

    我认为“欣赏”是随之而来的。我把它交给鲍勃·西格和他的银弹乐队。

    “当黑夜降临在你身上时,
    你会发现变得友善很容易。”

  27. @Justvisiting

    你忘记了少数族裔与犹太人的对比吗?

  28. @advancedatheist

    被称为“非自愿独身者”的被性驱逐的白人男性的兴起反映了这样一个事实,即我们的现代觉醒意识形态妖魔化了那些使他们的祖先取得成功的男性行为。

    我假设你的意思是上升 数字 被性驱逐的非自愿独身者,因为他们在社会中没有崛起。来吧,先进的,他们是专门的非自愿者 因为 他们不表现出男性行为。想要展示成年男性特征的男人和男孩就去吧

    ,他们不会坐在地下室里,做着一份糟糕的工作,并持有 MGTOW 的观点。

    男孩需要训练他们的眼睛关注蓝领职业、电气、建筑、古老、男子气概和迫切需要的职业。对于社会上 85% 拥有 STEM 以外学位或非常热门的法律学位和顶级头脑的男孩来说,没有白领、ez-desk 选择。甚至其中一些人也因为 EEOC 规定/50-50 的比例而被抛在后面,当然,还有人力资源部门的残暴女权主义者,以及迟早会出现在白宫的希拉里(或希拉里)。面对现实吧,你去哪里就有特权,这就是人类的处境。证明这一点的是,男女变性人的数量远多于相反的人。我们知道为什么,这就是女孩们的特权所在。

    作为女同性恋男人变性人炸弹是多么残暴的证据,就连女同性恋超级女权主义第一夫人、极端自由政客的女儿切尔西·克林顿(Chelsea Clinton)也违背了她母亲的本能,宣称男性>女变性人完全可以去偷东西。 TitleIX 中带有阴道的女性果实。这是专门为阴道而设的,希拉里等人也对此表示了不小的反对。现在切尔西对孩子们说:“去偷我母亲毕生劳动的成果吧”。无论如何,对我来说,这是一个令人难以置信的转折。如果希拉里没有因此生她女儿的气,她的酒量可能比我还多。切尔西将希拉里为女性赢得的胜利还给了男性。这是性政治的巨大变化,我认为它还没有被注意到。根据法律规定,这是女性在体育运动中的终结。

    那些书呆子男孩终于报复了那些不和他们一起打棒球的男性运动员,相反,在大学里,他们取代了女性。由于她们无法击败女性,甚至无法与她们共存,所以她们就成了她们。任何分裂女权主义的东西都适合我。我们即将看到女权主义公司对此做了什么,那些强大的女权主义者。因为异装癖会反击。

    学术智力低下且有点漫无目的的孩子的父母需要引导他们远离大学,转向贸易、土木、电力、水利、建筑等行业。他们将不得不再次学习如何努力工作。相信我,女性并没有要求 50% 的水利、电力或建筑工作。让女性参与建筑业的努力进展并不顺利。第一次出现寒冷、炎热或提重物的迹象时,我听到女孩们退出项目,再也没有回来。

    女人只想要轻松的工作。看看他们,胖乎乎的,身上有纹身,一头白发,愤怒地取代了男人​​们,抱怨男人们没有钱。

    • 同意: Mike Tre
  29. Mike Tre [又名“MikeatMikedotMike”] 说:
    @Achmed E. Newman

    先是说说,然后是付诸行动。行动胜于雄辩。库尔特更令人信服的是,她本人参与了使这个国家变得更美好的最重要的事情:那就是为这个有儿童的国家的未来做出贡献。我也不关注她的个人生活,但知道她是否已婚并且有孩子并不侵犯隐私,就像我窥探她的浏览器历史记录一样。

    这与加巴德或福克斯新闻的“保守”荡妇大队有着同样的危险信号——为什么这些女性不组建家庭呢?无论是自恋还是野心勃勃,在我看来,那些不愿意把钱花在嘴上的人都会失去信誉。

  30. @Jim Christian

    很棒的咆哮,克里斯蒂安先生*。有一个 全新的帖子 on 峰值愚蠢 在这件事上,但你的,尤其是克林顿母女的争吵方面,简直棒极了。我可以发布其中的一部分吗(当然,中间没有任何编辑)?

    顺便说一句,希望我们不必在这个论坛上称呼您为“克里斯蒂安修女”。 (无意侮辱,只是脑子里浮现出这首歌,而且这个笑话很恰当)

  31. @Mike Tre

    先是说说,然后是付诸行动。行动胜于雄辩。

    迈克,我一般不反对这一点。不过,库尔特小姐是一位女士,在我看来,她每周都不会出现在电视上或(附有照片)专栏上以树立榜样。至于政治家,则是另一回事了。 Peak Stupidity 几年前的帖子 无子女的欧洲领导人 准确地表达了你的观点。

    让我这样说吧:如果库尔特小姐写了一篇被数百万女性阅读的专栏(我猜她大部分是男性阅读的),甚至其中一万名女性对移民入侵涉及的数字有一点线索,举个例子,这比她生三个孩子要好得多。

    不过,正如我之前写给您的那样,像米歇尔·马尔金那样拥有一个家庭,必然会给她带来洞察力,从而有助于传播更保守的思想。我在最后的评论中没有具体提到这一点,但马尔金夫人写了奥威尔式的计算机技术废话,这种废话甚至在小学中也存在。这使她成为一个自由主义者,而我可以说安·库尔特是一个白手起家的自由主义者。

    • 回复: @Mike Tre
  32. 我只是一个愚蠢的、终生的农家女。这是我的观察。弱小动物通常会导致大自然淘汰其兽群。千禧一代的男人给我的印象就是这样。今天的女性甚至无法成功地养育自己的孩子,更不用说全人类了。当大自然的愤怒肆虐时,依靠祖先的成就并不能解决问题。在我看来,大自然妈妈只是通过太阳极小值、磁极移动和火环弹跳来做到这一点。我的猜测是,觉醒的女权主义恐怖统治应该在未来几十年内随着大规模的人类屠杀而结束。我还打赌阿米什人会继承地球而不是人工智能。

    • 回复: @anonymous
  33. 长期以来,那些相信“隐藏之手”的人一直在撰写和谈论一位神秘的“世界之王”。几个世纪后,真相逐渐浮出水面……

    让世界走向堕落的不是“国王”,而是“女王”……而她的男奴们都乐得默许她无法抗拒的统治。她向他们许诺“权力”、财富、名誉、性……所有尘世的快乐。他们欣然接受。

    这是千古以来的伟大秘密。直到现在,不知情的受试者才开始认识到其影响。

  34. @AaronB

    俄罗斯文化一直被认为具有女性特质,更倾向于女性化的东方,更符合情感、灵魂和精神,所有女性特质。俄罗斯男人明显比西方男人更温柔、更可爱——当他们不是低等的野蛮人时。

    我不确定我是否跟随你。但俄罗斯几千年的历史过去和现在都受到战争的影响,战争对塑造俄罗斯男性的文化表型发挥了至关重要的影响。俄罗斯一如既往,仍然是一个非常军事化的社会(我认为这是一个非常健康的特征)。好吧,正如我已经说过的,办公室浮游生物的狭窄阶层除外,即使在那里,也存在极少数例外。所以,我不确定战争中什么是如此女性化,但即使在今天,在俄罗斯,有一种说法——如果你没有服役(在军队),你就不是一个真正的男人——仍然是一种非常流行的说法,尽管这是错误的。它还解释了俄罗斯人对同性恋(和其他性别剥削)的厌恶和对真正女性气质的欣赏。

    • 回复: @NoH1B
  35. Norm Corin 说:

    杜罗彻(Durocher)阐述了性别差异存在的原因。但“随着我们变得舒适,我们的社会和文化也变得女性化和婴儿化。”

    这不足以解释这种破坏。 “人类的衰落”不仅仅是文明自然进化的一部分。这也是一个改善隐藏真实权力的理性过程,尤其是面对来自互联网的古腾堡新闻级威胁。

    在美国,共和党(个人权力)和民主党(团体权力)的双头垄断直到最近几年才一直是一个稳定的门面。该机构将这两者视为最自然(最不困难)的方面来维护:人们(大多数是无意识地)将自己分类为两者中最需要维护的基本人类力量类型,同时有意识地只相信他们是善的/正确的一方反对邪恶/错误,而不是认识到每一个都是人类力量的基本方面。

    女性化正在扰乱这一点。但作者没有解释其在修订后的西方的长期目的,西方现在正在失去其(表面上的)公共政治,这种政治依赖于公共辩论,即个人主张自己。

    通过现在打破平衡,女权主义、群体权力的一方不仅明显更重,而且也是唯一的 可接受 另一方面,新的建制派想要将个人权力在社会上的表现完全隐藏在“幕后”。个人权力在公开表达并在社会上行使时就会受到贬低,因此 没有人 敢于表达。只有 偷偷 仍然不露面的“当选者”现在可以行使这种权力。仅仅意识到这一事实是不被允许的。当然,无面力量一直存在,但展望未来,它甚至不会受到质疑。

    今天,当一场运动站稳脚跟并推动其要求时(例如上面讨论的与自然无关的性主张),每一个表面上的“权力”,例如公司董事会、大学行政人员或著名政治家,都会像一个纸牌屋。任何人都不得在原则上反对潮流。所以这不是决定的问题 原则是正确的——就是能够表达逆向思维 在所有 在公共领域。在一个只重视群体层面权力的世界里,只有群体思维是可以接受的。

    当然,美国当前值得注意的例外是唐纳德·特朗普和图尔西·加巴德,他们受到无情的嘲笑 道德上受到怀疑,而不是至少因坚持原则而受到尊重。

  36. Norm Corin 说:

    杜罗彻(Durocher)阐述了性别差异存在的原因。但“随着我们变得舒适,我们的社会和文化也变得女性化和婴儿化。”

    这不足以解释这种破坏。 “人类的衰落”不仅仅是文明自然进化的一部分。这也是一个改善隐藏真实权力的理性过程,尤其是面对来自互联网的古腾堡新闻级威胁。

    在美国,共和党(个人权力)和民主党(团体权力)的双头垄断直到最近几年才一直是一个稳定的门面。该机构将这两者视为最自然(最不困难)的方面来维护:人们(大多数是无意识地)将自己分类为两者中最需要维护的基本人类力量类型,同时有意识地只相信他们是善的/正确的一方反对邪恶/错误,而不是认识到每一个都是人类力量的基本方面。

    女性化正在扰乱这一点。但作者没有解释其在修订后的西方的长期目的,西方现在正在失去其(表面上的)公共政治,这种政治依赖于公共辩论,即个人主张自己。

    现在,通过打破平衡,女权主义、群体权力方面不仅明显更重,而且也是唯一可以接受的方面,新的建制派想要将个人权力在社会上的表现完全隐藏在“幕后”。个人权力在公开场合表达并在社会上行使时,就会受到贬低,以致没有人敢表达它。现在只有那些不露面的秘密“当选者”才能行使这种权力。仅仅意识到这一事实是不被允许的。当然,无面力量一直存在,但展望未来,它甚至不会受到质疑。

    今天,当一场运动站稳脚跟并推动其要求时(例如上面讨论的与自然无关的性主张),每一个表面上的“权力”,例如公司董事会、大学行政人员或著名政治家,都会像一个纸牌屋。任何人都不得在原则上反对潮流。因此,这并不是要决定哪些原则是正确的,而是要能够在公共领域表达相反的想法。在一个只重视群体层面权力的世界里,只有群体思维是可以接受的。

    当然,美国当前值得注意的例外是唐纳德·特朗普和图尔西·加巴德,他们因道德上的可疑而受到无情的嘲笑,而不是至少因坚持原则而受到尊重。

  37. 好莱坞尚未试图展示坚强、独立的黑人女性对诺曼底登陆成功的关键作用,但还有时间。

    嘿,神奇女侠,可以说是白人,但绝对是女性,打破了一战中西方战线的僵局。我猜他们会让莱斯利·琼斯在二战中扮演决定性的角色。

  38. @Achmed E. Newman

    很棒的咆哮,克里斯蒂安先生*。关于这一点,《愚蠢巅峰》上有一篇全新的帖子,但你的帖子,尤其是克林顿母女的争吵方面,简直棒极了。我可以发布其中的一部分吗(当然,中间没有任何编辑)?

    你可以把它打印在卫生纸上,我会在包装纸上签名,一毛钱一个标志。人们总是复制我的东西。我终于能做出点东西了,那不是 Da Bomb 吗?

  39. @Bardon Kaldian

    我认为这种以弱胜强的情况并不是前所未有的。基督徒如何征服罗马帝国?他们的策略包括扮演受害者的角色并成为他们事业的烈士。他们没有拿起武器,也没有参加革命。但当然,现在的结果很可能完全不同,第三方,即以前的主人或以前的受害者,可能会利用我们所知的西方文明的衰落。

    • 回复: @freedom-cat
  40. @Jim Christian

    很好的建议,吉姆!我有一个 30 多岁的男性亲戚,是一名服务员,正在社区大学学习一些政治学课程。 (他在 2016 年担任桑德斯竞选活动的志愿者,但我不知道他现在在做什么。)我希望我能向他的大脑灌输这样的信息:外面没有适合他的公务员办公室工作,他最好的选择是学习一门手艺。如果他有语言学习的能力,我也会告诉他移民到波兰。

    • 同意: Jim Christian
    • 回复: @Alden
    , @RadicalCenter
    , @JackOH
  41. Mr. Grey 说:

    认为女性追求不那么必要和光荣,或者女性历来无能为力的想法,是对女性的粗俗的女权主义诽谤。

    这是非常正确的。具有讽刺意味的是,女权主义者崇拜男性特征,蔑视女性特征。他们想描绘出过去 5,000 年来女性受害者的形象。我认为现代技术使传统女性的工作变得如此简单,我们已经忘记了它曾经是多么重要。我喜欢这个 YouTube 频道“Townsend's”。这是关于 18 世纪美国的生活。这家伙根据 18 世纪的烹饪书做了很多食谱。他还展示了生活的其他方面,例如制作和洗衣服。今天,我们认为做饭和洗衣是理所当然的,但在当时,这是一门真正的艺术,你实际上必须成为一名化学家才能洗衣服——尤其是精致、昂贵的衣服。也许好莱坞教会我们看不起家庭主妇。在西部片中,枪手们在草原上游荡,互相厮杀,食物和衣服不知何故自己解决了。男人是一家之主,但如果女人不高兴,什么事也做不成。

    • 回复: @awry
  42. @Achmed E. Newman

    在愚蠢之巅有一篇关于这件事的全新帖子,但是你的,尤其是克林顿母女争吵方面,

    哦,是的,艾哈迈德,差点忘了这一部分,我想你的生活中必须有一位母亲和她的两个女儿才能看到这场冲突。据我判断,现在没有多少女儿爱她们的母亲了。当希拉里的女儿将 TitleIX 的钥匙交给他们十年前嘲笑的变性人时,看到希拉里的嘶吼声和蒸汽从她的耳朵里冒出来,真是太奇怪了。

    第九条是关于剥夺男性权利的。男人们正在收回它。我从没想过女权主义者会如此轻易地接受这一点。最终将特权分配为现金和奖品。接下来是女子 PGA 巡回赛高尔夫比赛。

    平安,如果你能找到的话,呵呵..

    • 回复: @Alden
    , @Achmed E. Newman
  43. 为什么人们总是断言:

    西方国家一直在急速衰落,而西方人自己在几十年内将成为自己历史家园中的少数群体。

    是什么让人们认为,在英国这样的地方,这将比德克萨斯州或佛罗里达州更需要“几十年”的时间?还是法国的“几十年”?更像, a 至少对于任何有意义的人群(例如 65 岁以下的人)来说都是如此。

    另外,回复:人力资源部门。我怀疑你会继续看到白人(男性)的趋势 女性),被认定为西班牙裔,特别是随着 DNA 测试公司的发展,这些公司虽然不需要或不一定是证据(尽管可以),但证明很大一部分凯尔特血统的人实际上是伊比利亚人,并且根据政府、联邦和大多数州,“西班牙文化或血统”被视为西班牙裔。

  44. Alden 说:
    @Justvisiting

    在某些方面已经是这样了。第一个自称女性的男性运动员摧毁了女同性恋大学和职业体育运动。哈哈,他们活该。

    现在,男人自称是女人,抱怨每月的卫生用品。这个周末有一个关于泥潭和更多化妆的年轻人的故事。除了涂指甲油外,女性化妆的数量多年来一直在下降。这可能是化妆品公司为了弥补女性化妆品销量下降而向男性推销化妆品的阴谋。

    100 年前,卷烟公司成功地让女性相信吸烟很酷而且很精致。为什么不对男人做同样的事情并化妆呢?

    或者这可能只是 TPTB 的一个深刻的黑暗阴谋,目的是推翻女性至上运动并恢复男性统治。

    正是福特基金会和洛克菲勒基金会组织的TPTB让女性在几十年内获得了至高无上的地位。 TPTB 可能甚至希望普通人重新掌权。

    谁知道 TPTB 的邪恶中心潜藏着什么邪恶?

    最高法院可能很快就会裁定所有性别平等。因此,禁止因性别认同而歧视。

    因此,男性和女性可以再次平等地竞争大学入学、工作、合同。

    这些调查结果和命令可能会伴随最高法院的调查结果,即任何人都不能根据种族信仰或肤色进行歧视。然后是我们自 1968 年以来一直希望的,第 14 修正案适用于包括白人在内的所有人的命令。

    所有这些性别扭曲背后都有一些东西。可能是化妆品公司的钱。甚至可能是民主党官员也厌倦了标准的无能、咆哮的黑人女性政府。
    工人

    我不知道背后的人是谁,也不知道其动机。我只是很高兴女同性恋者得到他们应得的。

    • 回复: @Panafancypants
  45. PPB 说:
    @AaronB

    尽管由于“碰壁”动态以及对立面相互加强的普遍趋势,从相反的极点抵制文化主导议程很容易失败,但另类右翼对“觉醒”的正确抵制”也可以被用作一种转移注意力的策略,增强秘密“内部人士”将觉醒范式引向更健康方向的能力。 (我从来没有想到过皈依者这个词的两种含义——即外在皈依另一种宗教,以及最终皈依他们表面上所接受的宗教,但当然,这种互惠只是合理的)。

    另一方面,如果我们将觉醒视为一种肤浅的、支离破碎的、无意识的讽刺漫画,对更深层的普遍价值观潮流进行讽刺,那么无论何时,这种现象都有任何持久的现实,超越另一种过时的时尚,最终被它自己的表达所消解。内部矛盾和/或因其纯粹的非实质性而消失? 然而,根据你自己的基本论点,人们可以说,这种肤浅和缺乏实质内容将使整个“觉醒”现象更容易受到它蹩脚和扭曲模仿的更深层次价值观的渗透,从而允许自身被转化为更健康的自身表达。

    时间会证明一切……

  46. Alden 说:
    @Diversity Heretic

    政府工作严格禁止白人申请。他应该合法地将自己的姓氏改为普通的西班牙裔姓氏。

    工会和其他雇主一样受到盖世太保平权行动的影响。但他们被允许保留数学工程机械空间关系入学考试,因为法官不希望他们的法院因接线错误而起火,或因设计和工艺不合格而倒塌。

  47. Alden 说:
    @Jim Christian

    在我因结婚而忍受了来自女权主义者的仇恨和骚扰之后,我只是喜欢它,在地球母亲上充斥着邪恶的蓝眼睛孩子和房主。

    • 回复: @Jim Christian
    , @utu
  48. @Alden

    在我因结婚而忍受了来自女权主义者的仇恨和骚扰之后,我只是喜欢它,在地球母亲上充斥着邪恶的蓝眼睛孩子和房主。

    老犹太女权主义者首先嘲笑变性人、同性恋者和整个性堕落字母汤,然后将其武器化,以对抗白人异性恋男性,以夺取权力。而在这里,白人女权主义女性享受着特权,但接下来却要被送上砧板。就连堕落的女同性恋国会众议员凯蒂·希尔(Katie Hill)今天早上也不得不辞职,因为她在办公室与一名女孩调情。

    所以我们就看到了,他们部署的武器,围绕着整个社会的白人妇女和女孩,咬他们的屁股。很搞笑,不是吗?

    • 回复: @Commentator Mike
  49. @Bardon Kaldian

    “非洲人是失败的种族”

    我想说他们很好地适应了他们的环境;因为他们不像你而称他们为失败的种族只是偏见。非洲的主要问题是西方帝国主义。这就是非洲国家应该渴望成为西方社会的模仿者,因为西方人认为自己更优越。

    • 哈哈: Wally
  50. UmHello 说:

    傻家伙们,放弃吧,进入20世纪吧!世界其他地区已经进入21世纪。精子数量下降并不等于“女性化”,女权运动和一般女性都与此无关。伙计们,这是食物中的化学物质。

    几十年来,进步女性一直站在环保运动的最前沿。我们不希望您的精子数量下降或您的癌症发病率升高,我们希望你们以及我们自己能够吃到清洁、健康、未受污染的食物以及清洁的水和清洁的空气。当我们这么说时,我们希望我们的声音被听到,我们的担忧得到重视,而不是因为我们是女性而被忽视!那有多难?

    写下这篇1800年代咆哮的人应该知道他在推销一堆伪科学,这一切都被一次又一次地驳斥了。我是谁才能这么说?一位女性,一位女权主义者,拥有科学硕士学位(分子生物学),一位快乐的徒步旅行者和狗主人,鱼叉捕鱼者和雷鬼歌手!

    为什么不?女权主义者不是女妖,我们是尊重女性并捍卫每个女性享有平等机会、平等选择、平等报酬、平等信用、平等机会的权利的女性和男性。其他一切都随之而来:教育、经济机会、生育选择、尊严、幸福。我的伴侣是个男人,他远没有“女性化”,哈哈。男性,包括低收入男性、移民男性、美国黑人、残疾人、白人、所有男性,也应该有机会获得所有这些东西!这有什么问题吗?似乎唯一对女权主义不满的是那些想要贬低、限制和不尊重女性和支持性别平等的男性的性别歧视者。

  51. 伟大的文章利奥。西方的女性化是文化马克思主义终局的重要组成部分。具有某种程度统一的无产阶级的经典马克思主义从来没有好的结局。文化马克思主义和不同的身份群体将会有更糟糕的结局。一旦替罪羊白人种族消失,预计一场皇家大战/胜利者将所有战斗带到终点。任何一个身份群体能否容忍另一个群体?黑人和波多黎各人?黑人和奇卡诺人?穆斯林和 LGBTQ?女权主义者的定位在哪里?黑人女性会站在白人女性或其种族一边吗?穆斯林会接受女权主义的性别关系范式吗?当然,身份政治、全球主义以及根除基督教、西方文化和父权秩序的推动力是犹太精英。犹太人拥有统治新世界秩序的情报和财政资源。然而,他们缺乏人口数量和不同群体的信任。魔鬼背叛不奖励。白人种族和基督教将在俄罗斯和东欧部分地区生存。然而,它将是一个飞地,而不是一个占主导地位的帝国。大自然厌恶真空。向中国迈出正确的一步。

  52. Dumbo 说:

    我不认为女性化的社会能够持续太久,这只是演戏,真的。当事情变得艰难时,强大的女性会寻求男性的帮助。

    而且,我不认为整个社会的男性一定比以前“缺乏阳刚之气”。好吧,也许可以与斯巴达或其他超级男性社会相比。但总的来说,大多数男人只是平均水平。总是有一些人是战士,一些人是牧师,一些人是工程师,一些人是艺术家,等等。

    关于变性人或跨性别者,我不知道该怎么做。正如史蒂夫·赛勒(Steve Sailer)所观察到的那样,成为跨性别者的并不是女性化的男性(他们通常满足于成为妓女、易装癖者或变装皇后),但那些“转变”的人通常是已婚并有几个孩子的男性男性,然后在中年时他们决定“改变性别”。比如布鲁斯·詹纳,或者这个:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jan_Morris

    我不知道对此有何解释。

  53. anonymous[256]• 免责声明 说:
    @Old and grumpy

    我认为这个问题更多的是女性解放的结果。女性解放只不过是对男性的阉割。

    • 回复: @Kiel
  54. Wally 说:
    @kerdasi amaq

    可笑的共产主义废话。

    那什么是“帝国主义”呢?

    非洲人“渴望成为西方国家”,他们决心摆脱非洲困境就证明了这一点。

    • 同意: Dannyboy, brandybranch
    • 巨魔: Iris
  55. PPB 说:
    @UmHello

    你所描述的(你好)是健康的女权主义。 无论好坏,女权主义与许多其他本质上有价值和合法的运动一样,都有一种被边缘分子扭曲的倾向,这些边缘分子的议程要么有点模糊,要么狭隘的党派偏见或敌对性,要么甚至彻头彻尾的妄想和狂妄。 并不是说女权主义的纯粹含义应该因与这些元素的联系而受到毒害,但很多人(我想主要是男性)将两者混为一谈,特别是当他们的怨恨(对任何事物)需要一个广泛而方便的目标时。 对于一个类似的例子,请参阅此论坛和其他类似论坛上许多关于犹太教和犹太人的简单化贬义评论。

  56. @Diversity Heretic

    你给年轻人的建议是对的。

    了解一些生产性的实物贸易,这些贸易可能会继续受到需求,但已经缺乏年轻的合格人才,并且在不久的将来可能比其他一些工作更难实现自动化:

    人们会想到焊工、水管工、电工和汽车修理工等熟练工种。

    过去会说“卡车司机”,但在不远的将来,长途卡车运输可能会很大程度上实现自动化。也许短途卡车运输是一个不错的选择,前提是安全的本地自动驾驶卡车不可能像安全的长途自动驾驶/准自动驾驶卡车一样可行。

    • 回复: @Poco
  57. jbwilson24 说:
    @kerdasi amaq

    “非洲的主要问题是西方帝国主义。”

    哦,放弃吧。

    1300 年,欧洲人在非洲无处可去。从 800 年到 1600-1800 年,当欧洲人最终占据上风时,伊斯兰教一直统治着非洲。

    在欧洲接触之前,黑人究竟在做什么? 建造巨大的城堡? 即使是孤立的玛雅人和阿兹特克人也设法在没有与先进文明接触的优势的情况下生产了 100 倍的文化。

    目前,中国是非洲主权的大问题,而不是欧洲人。

    • 同意: Eternally Antifascist
  58. Mike Tre [又名“MikeatMikedotMike”] 说:
    @Achmed E. Newman

    “让我这样说吧:如果库尔特小姐写了一篇被数百万女性阅读的专栏(我猜她大部分是男性阅读的),甚至其中一万名女性对涉及移民入侵的数字有一点线索,只是为了例如,这比她生三个孩子要好得多。 ”

    那么想象一下,如果她能够将抚养 3 个孩子的经历融入到她的写作中,可能会有多少女性一直阅读她的专栏。 🙂

    • 同意: Achmed E. Newman
    • 回复: @Dumbo
  59. Mike Tre [又名“MikeatMikedotMike”] 说:
    @kerdasi amaq

    “我想说他们很好地适应了他们的环境; ”

    渡渡鸟也是如此。但它的环境仍然认为适合解除它的存在。

    • 哈哈: Bardon Kaldian
  60. Dumbo 说:
    @Mike Tre

    女性倾向于附和大多数人的话语,所以,我不认为安·库尔特生孩子会以这种或那种方式影响大多数自由派女性的事情,因为这是对她们的期望。

    有了孩子,她写作的时间肯定会减少。

    不管怎样,她显然是一个非常聪明的女人,所以,最聪明的女人生孩子较少是正常的或可以预料的。

    比起米歇尔·马尔金,我更喜欢她,我已经很长时间没有读过马尔金了,但她给我的印象是一个非常无聊的共和党人,几乎没有任何原创思想。

    • 回复: @Achmed E. Newman
  61. @Maria Elisa

    基督教得到君士坦丁皇帝的认可和认可。基督教从未征服过罗马帝国。

    • 回复: @Maria Elisa
  62. @AaronB

    我觉得这有点阴谋论。苏联的垮台是因为国际资本撤回了支持,特别是在大多数俄罗斯犹太人前往以色列或美国之后。旧日的反俄敌意卷土重来。

    • 同意: utu, Poco
  63. NoH1B 说:
    @Andrei Martyanov

    看这个

    看看普京在5点55分说的话。他正在对达吉斯坦进行历史性的访问,与民兵共进盛宴,这些民兵击败了 19 年前被派往该地区的中情局资助的外国雇佣军。

    他会见了退伍军人。他赞扬男人的勇气和勇敢以及女人的美丽(内在和外在)。这样的事情对于当今西方的“性别流体”来说是一种亵渎。那是一个美丽健康的社会,而西方在文化上正在崩溃

  64. @UmHello

    来自左派或他们有用的白痴之一的典型的煤气灯和杂项和贝利谬误。 这就是我们在过去 171 年里陷入当前社会混乱和精神错乱的方式:“哦,我们只是想要公平,你不可能反对,这听起来不错吗?” 然后,一步一步来,狂热的女权主义者如潮水般涌现,要求在大大小小的一切事物上都优于男性。

    早就看穿这样的伎俩了……但是 MPAI 和西方文明现在已经无法挽救了。

    • 同意: Eternally Antifascist
  65. @UmHello

    我强烈建议每一个还有性欲的男人都去看一下电影《柳条人》(2006)。你永远不会以同样的方式看待女性,你也肯定永远不会再将她们置于任何一种崇拜的地位。简而言之,如果允许他们在没有男人作为领导者的情况下获得权力,简而言之,纵容女巫将把社会拖入盲目的极权主义,你最终会现实地看到他们的本来面目。

    • 回复: @Achmed E. Newman
    , @dcite
  66. Rahan 说:

    有时我认为欧洲需要最低限度的非洲和阿拉伯暴徒作为一种免疫系统兴奋剂,以不断提醒埃洛伊人世界是如何运作的。

    只是过度接种疫苗会杀死整个机体。或者让它变得自闭。

    同样,(((白人同胞)))——这些可能是社会有机体的“肠道细菌”。当他们各司其职并按应有的方式运作时,每个人都会获胜。但如果肠道细菌扩散到其自然栖息地之外,毒性反应就会开始。

    一旦德国、法国和意大利真正醒悟,并将泛音窗口的边界推回正常状态,他们也许应该引入某种形式的选秀,将年轻人派往非洲和亚洲半年, *帮助建造东西* 或者你有什么。一旦回到祖国,这些年轻人将永远不会再认为一切都是理所当然的,并将尽其所能以确保欧洲的安全和正常运转。

  67. @Jim Christian

    正如我在博文中所写,用乔治·克鲁尼的话来说,女权主义者是 噢,兄弟,你在哪里?,一个紧张的地方。如果他们抱怨睾丸激素过多的“女士”在体育运动中击败了其他真正的女士,那就意味着男性在体育活动方面比女性更好。他们不能这么说,因为,你知道, 比利·简·金击败鲍比·里格斯 还有屎……

    感谢您的回复。几天之内我可能会从你那里偷走那一点。

    • 回复: @Jim Christian
    , @kerdasi amaq
  68. @Monotonous Languor

    嘿,谢谢你的推荐,ML,我刚刚查了一下,我已经看过了,但我一生都记不起标题和整个故事(我在某家酒店的电视上看到了它)。我会看的——我在这里得到了很多推荐,比如这本书 中国男孩 我想是来自奥尔登。

  69. @Dumbo

    我不同意米歇尔·马尔金的观点,并且在这次谈话中已经两次提到了她。你应该读一下她关于在学校向幼儿介绍的奥威尔式“科技”废话的文章。是的,她显然从让孩子在公立学校上学中获得了信息和动力。

    • 回复: @Jim Christian
    , @Mike Tre
  70. @NoH1B

    看这个

    视频没有附加,但我知道你在说什么视频。仅举一个例子——这些是俄罗斯英雄的涂鸦(真实的):

    或这个:

    https://go2.imgsmail.ru/imgpreview?key=5d0f66835e060e7b&mb=imgdb_preview_1670

    或这个:

    它们遍布俄罗斯各地。也足以让人回想起沃罗涅日有 30, 000 人参加了罗曼·菲利波夫少校的送行活动。

    自我牺牲的传统是存在的,而且一直都是。归根结底,这才是衡量一个男人的真正标准。

    • 回复: @NoH1B
  71. Anon[200]• 免责声明 说:

    @Andrei Maryanov 虽然我了解俄罗斯作为一个国家的更健康的方面,比如反同性恋、支持宗教和教育水平相当一流,但它并不是一个非常健康的社会。

    它的谋杀率很高(尽管官方统计数据显示自 2002 年以来已大幅下降),离婚率、自杀率、艾滋病毒/艾滋病发病率均属世界最高,污染也是如此。最重要的是,普京正在将中亚人和中国人大量输入到该国历史上的斯拉夫地区……大概是为了填补俄罗斯日益减少的斯拉夫人口中的劳动力。即便如此,经济增长并未重启,主要是因为严重的腐败,尽管你可能会说俄罗斯从未获得过中国那样的市场,而且还因为它受到制裁。该国的实际收入继续下降。

    看来俄罗斯并不是全部 毕竟与西方不同。

  72. NoH1B 说:
    @Andrei Martyanov

    哦,刚刚注意到这一点。

    这是视频:

    前往 5:50
    他说,有这样的人,有这样伟大善良美丽的女人,有勇敢坚强的男人, 它的领导者不能成为三色堇! 。他是一位多么伟大的政治家啊。当与(假)过道上的西方“领导人”并列时,我说哈哈。主要哈哈。

    “后女权主义”类型的人在面对这个男人时会崩溃!!!

  73. 一篇有趣且写得好的文章,但我认为这里的一个关键问题是,自由主义者实际上并不希望研究性别和种族,即使他们声称站在科学一边。自由主义者希望公众相信他们已经研究过这些问题,但网上辩论很快表明,平等主义者并没有告诉我们一切。

    此次民意调查中支持审查制度的男性和女性只是害怕结果。女性更有可能支持审查制度这一事实微不足道,一点也不令人惊讶。单身女性更有可能成为自由主义者,而自由主义者也更有可能支持审查制度。现在,在他们看来,最有可能将其合理化为“停止伪科学”,但我怀疑很大一部分人悄悄地怀疑存在差异,并本能地意识到对上述差异的研究对自由主义来说并不是好兆头。

    至于那张社论图片,我想说它们缺乏多样性。他们没有收到备忘录吗?

  74. @Anon

    尽管官方统计数据显示自 2002 年以来大幅下降

    事实上,这确实是戏剧性的,除其他外,它还导致俄罗斯预期寿命的急剧增加。不要忘记,俄罗斯继承的许多弊病,包括艾滋病毒流行等,都是从 1990 世纪 2000 年代到 XNUMX 年代初开始的。酒精消费量也大幅下降。

    https://www.foxnews.com/food-drink/russian-alcohol-consumption-down-43-leading-to-significant-decrease-in-mortality-rates

    我注意到你使用了“官方”,对于那些相信只有西方“数据”才是“可靠”的人来说,这些数据来自世界卫生组织。大多数俄罗斯城市(更不用说主要城市中心)都非常安全——比任何美国或西欧城市都安全得多。

    普京正在将中亚人和中国人大批输入该国历史上的斯拉夫地区……

    完全是BS。西方非政府组织和“俄罗斯”自由主义“反对派”进行宣传。

    毕竟,俄罗斯与西方似乎并没有什么不同。

    俄罗斯与现代(当代)西方,或者更确切地说是它的残余部分,有着巨大的不同。我不再认为当代西方是西方了。

    • 回复: @Anon
  75. sayless 说:
    @Jim Christian

    有时我认为男变女的跨性别男人就像一匹拒绝栅栏的马。

    成为一个正常的成年人对于任何性别的人来说都是一项成就,但成为一个男人似乎需要更多有意识的、持续的努力,并且更加令人担忧。而对于女孩来说,任务更多的是发现她们到底是什么样的女人。她们大多不担心自己是否是“真正的女人”。

  76. 好悲伤,

    事实上,我跳下飞机,在海军陆战队服役,做过许多艰苦的军事工作,从事建筑工作,带领露营旅行,参加高空和低空绳索课程,参加体育运动。 。 。被打折扣为迈向成年的一步,因为我没有孩子,拒绝和每一个在耳边的开放女人一起睡觉,而且还没有在任何0场合摔倒----

    废话。

    我认为这里的部分问题在于,所谓的领导者对作为一个男人的意义有一种扭曲的认识。
    ---------

    在我看来,那些自称是基督徒、没有孩子、没有在子宫里杀死孩子、也没有乱搞的单身女性实际上树立了美德的坚实榜样——

  77. “简而言之,如果允许他们在没有男人作为领导者的情况下获得权力,简而言之,纵容女巫,他们将把社会拖入盲目的极权主义,那么你最终会现实地看到他们的本来面目。”

    我会看原版——更强大,以一个真正有美德的人为中心(罕见的男性视角)。 。 。当然它避免了女权主义的伎俩,但也避免了情节合理性的问题。

    1973 年的《柳条人》——他所要做的就是和任何女人上床就能挽救自己的生命——他不知道接下来会发生什么,但他从不妥协。

  78. Anon[200]• 免责声明 说:
    @Andrei Martyanov

    由于这已经偏离主题了,这将是我对俄罗斯的最后一次回应,也是因为我仍然以一般匿名身份回应。我觉得你没有真诚地回答我,所以请尝试理解我想说的。

    事实是,我接触到了双方(西方和俄罗斯)的宣传。事实上,我有一位爱国的俄罗斯父亲,我在绝大多数事情上都同意他的观点,包括西方长期以来对俄罗斯的妖魔化。但他也是一个现实主义者,因为这个国家存在大量严重问题,特别是因为我们住在那里时都接触过这些问题。让我们明确一点,各方都想互相妖魔化并称赞自己是最好的。他们会使用真假事实来支持他们的叙述。事实上,当俄罗斯因某种脆弱或意识形态原因受到攻击时,我经常为他们辩护。我也知道西方如此与俄罗斯对抗是非常错误的,特别是在科索沃和克里米亚的双重标准上。因此,你在一份回复中暗示,我在某种程度上了解并完全相信“西方非政府组织和俄罗斯自由反对派”的言论,只是因为他们利用了一些不那么令人愉快的事实来为自己谋取利益,这是无效的(“官方”指的是仅针对俄罗斯官方的谋杀统计数据,而不是来自西方的统计数据)。您是否属于那些相信每个俄罗斯民族主义者都受到中央情报局资助的人之一,这证明政府有理由镇压那些抱怨车臣人和其他非斯拉夫移民经常在该国袭击、强奸和杀害俄罗斯人、乌克兰人等事实的人?你有没有听过或读过《卫报》或《纽约时报》声称普京如此支持移民是错误的,甚至嘲笑“坚定保守的普京”不介意像北美或西方那样做欧洲在这方面呢?我没有,但如果他们这么说,我希望被证明是错的,因为我的目的是辩论和交流知识,而不是争论。但我发现普京在一些场合批评西方否定其自己的历史文化(大概还有人口),他这样做是对的。

    你为什么不对我的其他观点作出实质性回应?这是一个俄罗斯视频,介绍了为什么来自前独联体国家的移民(以及作为欧亚联盟项目的一部分)对俄罗斯经济有利。 “西方胡言乱语”从何而来?我真的很困惑。我们在谋杀问题上也达成了一致(我不同意俄罗斯作为一个整体是非常安全的,因为按照西方标准,谋杀率仍然很高,但肯定已经取得了很大进步)和酒精。为什么西方说俄罗斯在犯罪和酗酒方面有所改善是正确的?并拥有良好的教育体系,但在高离婚率、自杀率、艾滋病毒/艾滋病、污染和移民率等俄罗斯官方承认的问题上突然出现错误?您并没有说这些是完全错误的,但您确实在帖子中暗示了这一点。

    我尝试始终对事物保持平衡的看法,这意味着你必须接受好的与坏的,这些东西在呈现时会破坏任何叙述(正面或负面)。生活从来都不是非黑即白的,除非是在最贫穷的国家。我希望您的下一次回复中少一些意识形态,多一些平衡/数据。

    • 回复: @Andrei Martyanov
    , @utu
  79. 纪尧姆·杜罗谢(Guillaume Durocher):“在史前部落中,一个成功的人会花很多时间锻炼身体,狩猎动物或与其他人交战,作为人类联盟的一部分。

    [...]

    随着我们变得舒适,我们的社会和文化也变得女性化和婴儿化。

    [...]

    因此,当和平在我们的土地上取得胜利时,男性权威却完全崩溃,这可能并非巧合。”

    整篇文章本来可以简化为这三句话。杜罗赫所痛惜的变化是由于文明,特别是工业革命以来的技术文明造成的。在我看来,毫无争议的是,如果文明崩溃或被迫崩溃,缺失的性别二态性就会立即重新出现。但对于右翼来说,他们热爱技术“进步”,并自诩为陷入困境的西方文明捍卫者,这种前景是无法容忍的。这些“保守派”有着一种幼稚的愿望,即鱼与熊掌兼得。享受他们的文明,但没有它必然带来的性别角色、种族关系、职业、经济、文化等方面的变化。太糟糕了,但事实并非如此。

    • 回复: @peterAUS
  80. @Achmed E. Newman

    你应该读一下她关于在学校向幼儿介绍的奥威尔式“科技”废话的文章。

    谷歌、脸书和微软的孩子们不是在排队等待在他们的手套上植入芯片,以代替身份证来进入旧园区吗?这真是奥威尔式的。

    • 同意: Achmed E. Newman
  81. @NoH1B

    他赞扬男人的勇气和勇敢以及女人的美丽(内在和外在)。这样的事情对于当今西方的“性别流体”来说是一种亵渎。

    我们军队中的阴道小球拥有一种只有胖乎乎的追逐者才会看重的美丽。

    • 回复: @obwandiyag
  82. @Achmed E. Newman

    艾哈迈德,你是一名工程师,不是吗?是的?您如何看待围绕佛罗里达国际大学女性设计的人行天桥的“叙事崩溃”?他们正在努力决定起诉谁。很可能没有女性。根据我在文章后的评论,桥梁一旦倒塌,叙述也随之倒塌。

    https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/crime/article236597488.html?utm_source=pushly&intcid=pushly_456396

    • 回复: @Achmed E. Newman
  83. peterAUS 说:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    “在史前部落中,一个成功的人会花很多时间锻炼身体,狩猎动物或与其他人交战,作为人类联盟的一部分。

    [...]

    随着我们变得舒适,我们的社会和文化也变得女性化和婴儿化。

    [...]

    因此,当和平在我们的土地上取得胜利时,男性权威却完全崩溃,这可能并非巧合。”

    整篇文章本来可以简化为这三句话。

    是的。

    恕我直言,这造成了一个特殊的难题。

    看来,重新强调男性事物(或无论人们如何称呼它)的唯一方法就是让我们感到不舒服。再次让生活变得艰难。
    我们真的,我的意思是真的想要它吗?
    我不太确定。

    让我们从个人层面来说:
    在日常生活中,我的家人(亲密的和大的)和(少数)朋友/熟人不太关注我。或者……呵呵……不太需要我。
    但是,一旦有什么事情不太对劲,他们就会这么做。提出问题、寻求建议、帮助等等。呵呵……只要“不舒服”持续,它就会持续下去。一旦一切恢复正常,我又被遗忘了。直到下一次。
    现在……自我感觉不太好。尽管如此,我发现这比生活在那些每天都会发生这些不舒服的事情的环境中要好得多。

    说得通?

    至于

    在我看来,毫无争议的是,如果文明崩溃或被迫崩溃,缺失的性别二态性就会立即重新出现。

    或者任何 SHTF 场景。

    就个人而言,从汽车在城市“不同”地区抛锚的情况来看,
    自卫场景、疾病、失业……只是当前范式中任何“不舒服”的事情。那里有很长的名单。

    • 同意: lavoisier
    • 回复: @Test of time
  84. Maria Elisa:“我认为这种以弱胜强的情况并不是史无前例的。基督徒如何征服罗马帝国?他们的策略包括扮演受害者的角色并成为他们事业的烈士。”

    基督教以通常的方式进行征服,通过杀戮和掠夺,焚烧和摧毁之前发生的一切。相比之下,他们的掠夺行为让塔利班的行为显得温和。关于基督教殉道者的故事大多是胜利者教会所写的小说。查理·马特尔和他的孙子查理曼屠杀了数以万计不接受基督教的异教徒。如果您想了解更多信息,请阅读吉本在他的纪念性著作中关于基督教接管所造成的破坏的说法。 罗马帝国衰落的历史; 或阅读 Catherine Nixey 的 黑暗时代:古典世界的基督教毁灭; 或者如果你能读懂德语,有一个十卷的非常学术的帐户是可用的, 克里斯蒂安教堂 [基督教犯罪史],卡尔海因茨·德施纳 (Karlheinz Deschner)。德施纳巨著的某些部分已被我的朋友 CT 翻译成英文,可以在他的网站上找到 chechar.wordpress.com.

  85. peterAUS:“我们真的,我的意思是真的想要它吗?
    我对此不太确定。”

    这就是问题,不是吗?到目前为止,共识是反对的。技术文明的丧失被认为付出的代价太高了。

    右派失败的原因是他们不愿意做他们必须做的事情才能成功。

    • 回复: @peterAUS
    , @Miro23
  86. @Anon

    你为什么不对我的其他观点作出实质性回应?这是一个俄罗斯视频,介绍了为什么来自前独联体国家的移民(以及作为欧亚联盟项目的一部分)有利于俄罗斯经济

    我还可以从某个“电报”频道找到一个视频,并将其命名为“俄罗斯”。这种“进口”有一个非常具体的程序,我对它有第一手、亲密和非常个人的了解:我的嫂子在 1980 世纪 100 年代嫁给了一个乌兹别克人,她是 1% 的俄罗斯人。她的孩子们花了很多年才获得俄罗斯公民身份或 PMZh 。直到今年 XNUMX 月 XNUMX 日,该法律才开始生效,允许俄罗斯语言和文化的持有者毫无问题地获得第二公民身份。它是专门为俄罗斯人、俄罗斯人或斯拉夫人近亲设计的。工作签证、绿卡(PMZh)和进口并不相同。不,俄罗斯不会“进口”中国。有一些中国季节性工人和贸易商,特别是在远东地区,但没有“进口”。最后是Rossstat。你可以自行查找资料。

  87. peterAUS 说:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    我们在这里“谈论”了你和我的基本角度。

    让我们重申一下我的观点:

    技术文明的丧失被认为付出的代价太高了。

    是的。

    右派失败的原因是他们不愿意做他们必须做的事情才能成功。

    是的。
    在我的书中,不愿意开发一个(定制的)版本的国家社会主义。

    最终的结果很可能是……比如……《黑客帝国:重装上阵》中的“舞蹈场景”。哈哈……所有名字中的“锡安”。
    (跳舞的)质量很容易获得。 “理事会”也是如此。唯一……呵呵……不太清楚的是理事会的实际等级制度。到底谁才是最顶尖的?

    考虑到这部电影的制作者,也就不足为奇了。

    顺便说一句,我记得电影上映时,我的一个熟人的反应。一个适应良好的年轻白人男性。事实上,这很有趣。他不喜欢这部电影。我小心翼翼地探寻着。那一幕……呵呵……不知为何,他有些不舒服,但他当然也无法解释为什么。他实在做不到。
    当直觉与洗脑发生冲突时,这是一个完美的例子……我指的是社交。

  88. @freedom-cat

    你是对的。我的意思是它征服了人们的心。据我所知,它赢得了康斯坦丁的认可,征服了他母亲的心。

    • 回复: @HallParvey
  89. @UmHello

    字面意思是“Bb-but it's THE CURRENT YEAR™,tho!!!”

    LOL

  90. anarchyst 说:

    不断推动多元文化主义、多样性、种族混合以及政府强制否认基本的“结社自由”,这比生活中的任何其他因素都更能使我们白人(尤其是白人男性)与基本的社会和文化规范隔离开来.

    其他种族不受影响,因为他们被鼓励庆祝和审视自己的文化,而不必忍受政府强制执行的多元文化主义、多样性和“平等”骗局。对于美国白人男性来说却并非如此,他们被要求服从并放弃我们在美国社会中应有的地位。

    只有我们白人应该牺牲和淡化我们的社会和文化规范,是的,甚至是我们的存在。 其他种族和文化的人不断提醒我们白人,我们是世界上大部分问题的根源,我们因困扰人类的每一个问题而受到指责。

    这么多充满潜力的白人男性正在自杀,而不是忍受其他种族和文化的破坏性行为,这是一个悲剧。

    我们中的许多白人男性深情地回顾 1965 年之前的美国,当时身为美国人实际上意味着什么,而那些希望移民到美国的人必须接受美国的社会和文化规范和态度。

    对于那些将(对某些人来说)民权法律和法规强加给我们白人的“最伟大的一代”,他们摧毁了世界上最好的希望和破坏性的哈特塞勒移民法案,谢谢你什么都没有。

  91. anarchyst 说:

    从1950世纪XNUMX年代中期至今,美国白人已经“习惯”接受“部落”所谓的“民权(对某些人)”运动。 “调节”始于整个“民权(对某些人)”运动,该运动由左派犹太人带头、运行和控制。

    我亲眼目睹了整个“民权(对某些人)”运动的恶作剧、歪曲和彻头彻尾的欺诈。我不需要被“红色丸子”看到这个犹太人经营和控制的白人剥夺将把我们带向何方。

    它需要使用联邦军队来迫使我们白人(在刺刀下)屈服于整个“民权(对某些人来说)”的混乱局面。 使用联邦军队胁迫我们白人接受我们自己的毁灭是犹太人的一个绝妙举动。 因为我们白人过去和现在都非常守法,所以很容易恐吓我们。 实际上,为国内执法目的使用联邦军队过去是(现在仍然是)非法的……

    困难时期会淘汰自由派白人,以及关心兔子和树木而不是人类的环保主义者。 当那一天到来时,让他们饿死……

    我们中有更多的白人比大多数人意识到的更了解正在发生的事情。 由于我们生活的环境动荡不安,我们这些有意识的白人保持低调。失业的威胁,对我们家庭的真正暴力威胁(“当权者”不会解决)和其他考虑因素使我们保持低调从公开表达我们对这些问题的真实感受,但时间会到来。 我们白人的行动(和反应)非常缓慢,但是当我们这样做时,请注意……当“迫不得已”时,我们将收回我们与生俱来的权利……

    • 回复: @Commentator Mike
  92. anarchyst 说:

    让我们看看美国的“流行文化”,看看美国白人异性恋男性是如何被描绘和对待的。今天的流行文化和四十年前的文化将我们白人男性描绘成笨手笨脚的白痴,被一个无所不知的专横“妻子”控制和侮辱,而流鼻涕和顽皮的孩子动不动就侮辱他。

    我们成年白人男性不再像以前那样被视为社会及其家庭的领导者和保护者,而是被降级到人类的最低层次,被其他人利用和虐待。

    事情还不止于此,好莱坞对白人男性的负面描绘,少数族裔处于权力和责任的位置,(低等的)白人男性总是对黑人上级、主管或领导负责,尽管现实另有规定。

    “教育系统”并没有什么好用的,而是针对完全女性化的女性,使男孩沦为功能失调,吸毒甚至被排斥的地位,仅仅是为了男孩。

    对我们白人男性的谴责几乎已经完成。早就该收回我们在社会中应有的地位了。首先抵制犹太人拥有和经营的好莱坞,并让节目赞助商知道原因......

  93. @Jim Christian

    是的,但我无法真正了解足够的信息来写下迈阿密结构性失败所发生的事情。但我刚刚读了这篇文章并看到了你的评论,吉姆。

    我没有关注这个故事,但我刚才读到的是,要起诉的大事是彻头彻尾的疏忽,当发现裂缝超过允许的 40 倍后,没有人下令关闭街道。那里不涉及脑力,只是诚实地告诉人们道路必须关闭。

    虽然你的回复者不明白你的意思,是的,叙述已经改变了——不再提及“女性设计的结构”。

    顺便说一句,我在那里看到了罗伯特·萨姆沃尔特的名字。作为 NTSB 的负责人,他真是无所事事! (我读到他们通常不参与国家事务,但这是一个例外。) NTSB 是我尊重的极少数美国政府机构之一。

  94. Kiel 说:
    @anonymous

    我同意你的评论,但想补充一点:

    “我认为这个问题更多的是女性解放的结果。女性解放只不过是对男性的阉割。”

    [。 。 。在国家持有的枪管下。]

    我不会责怪年轻人不“挺身而出”,无论这意味着什么,通常是由愤怒的女性和年长的测试型男性定义的,他们欺骗自己认为自己是男人——通常是通过听他们结婚的老太婆说的话喜欢,

    “如果妈妈不快乐,那么没有人会快乐。”

    那个女人说她不是女人,她是一个控制欲很强的婊子,不应该生孩子,而她的阴户丈夫应该在他可以生孩子的时候把她放在她的位置上——如果没有其他原因的话,而不是保护他的孩子免受她的 BPD/自恋型人格障碍的侵害。

    你们这些老混蛋不是男人,你们是混蛋——对你们的妻子来说是混蛋,对你们的政府来说是混蛋。在 20 世纪,没有一场战争是值得打的,但你太他妈愚蠢了,看不到这一点(更不用说对此采取行动了),不是吗?

    [白人]年轻人不会挺身而出,因为他们没有什么可做的,除了一些疲惫不堪的年轻臭女人,在她撞到墙上之前骑着公鸡狂欢,然后想敲定薪水以允许产卵她被污染的卵巢被赶出了主力婴儿,并让她在接下来的25年里永久获得这个可怜的傻瓜所创造的一半的东西。

    回想起来,我自己都不知道自己是如何逃脱这样的命运的。感谢上帝,我已经 50 多岁了,但我告诉我 28 岁的侄子,做你想做的事,但不要给他们你的钱,不要让他们怀孕,也不要他妈的嫁给他们。如果他想要孩子,我告诉他找一个有坚如磐石合同的代孕妈妈,婚姻在女人心目中是一笔生意——别被搞砸了。

  95. @Justvisiting

    完全正确,合资企业。他们提出的每一个小问题都必然会触发圈内的一位同志。让我们尽力为他们提供所需的所有弹药。让我们期待连环拔毛事件的兴起和打脸驾车事件的爆发。

  96. @Mike Tre

    “这与加巴德或福克斯新闻的‘保守派’荡妇大队是同样的危险信号”

    我怀疑加巴德有鸡巴,或者希望她有。

  97. @亚伦b
    这就是它下跌的原因。过强、过硬、过分不弯曲的东西就无法适应而变得脆弱。

    苏联因经济而解体。很明显,马克思的计划有点愚蠢,人们已经厌倦了它的不断失败。

    如果苏联采用有限的市场经济,那么它就会像中国和越南一样。崩溃与太多的男子气概无关。是的,他们固执地承认共产主义的缺陷,但这并不是男性独有的特征。一般来说,左派人士不太善于承认自己的错误。女左派是政界最顽固的人之一。事实上,今天的极左派主要是女性,并且极其抵制自我分析。

    • 回复: @anonymous coward
  98. 回想起来,我自己都不知道自己是如何逃脱这样的命运的。感谢上帝,我已经 50 多岁了,但我告诉我 28 岁的侄子,做你想做的事,但不要给他们你的钱,不要让他们怀孕,也不要他妈的嫁给他们。如果他想要孩子,我告诉他找一个有坚如磐石合同的代孕妈妈,婚姻在女人心目中是一笔生意——别被搞砸了。

    这种态度过于消极和愤世嫉俗。

    城外也有很多好女人。

    宣扬消极态度对任何人都没有帮助。我附近的每个人都婚姻幸福,但我相信你甚至认为这是不可能的。

    • 回复: @Kiel
  99. Anonymous[169]• 免责声明 说:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    嗯嗯亚洲人!!!没有他们我们该怎么办?

  100. utu 说:
    @Alden

    “邪恶的蓝眼睛孩子”

    “邪恶的蓝眼睛孩子”的毁灭早在 1950 世纪 XNUMX 年代就已定下:

  101. @AaronB

    但那些微妙、适应性强、聪明的另类右翼人士在哪里呢? 到目前为止,为什么这样的人这么少? 他们为什么这么蠢?

    到目前为止,另类右翼中很少有人试图改变现状。 我们还没有达到与时代精神作斗争或巧妙改变时代精神的阶段。 大多数情况下,我们仍然只是分享信息并讨论我们无法控制的事态发展。

    你关于不正面对抗现代趋势的说法可能是对的,但我想成为这里的魔鬼代言人。仅在 60 年前,“觉醒者”还像我们现在一样被边缘化——但他们却占据了上风。我们需要研究他们是如何成功的。至少,我们应该采用索尔·阿林斯基的《激进分子规则》——特别是让敌人遵守自己的规则;并将嘲笑作为有力的武器。敌人变得懒惰和自满,这使得它很容易成为目标。

    • 回复: @AaronB
  102. 我相信男人的衰落 尚未见底。当然,在西欧,驱逐过多的“50岁以上的白人男性”(法国的一个常见说法)的过程尚未完成。

    情况还会继续恶化。如果一个组织有效地雇用一名白人或亚裔男性担任高声望的工作,那么它还必须雇用一名白人或亚裔女性来做类似的工作,以及一名非亚裔少数族裔 (NAM) 男性和一名 NAM 女性。少数有能力的女性和 NAM 的需求量很大,而找不到她们的雇主将不得不雇用能力较差的人来弥补性别和种族平衡。例如,运营一家科技公司的成本将上升 4 倍。

    当然这是行不通的,这将成为西方衰落的一个显着特征。

    西方历史的特点是衰落与重生的循环。
    (随后讨论异教与基督教)

    这是一个有趣的观点,但我认为这是错误的。目前的斗争不会那么持久。它不是 2,000 年甚至 200 年后仍能被识别的趋势的一部分。

    在欧洲,我们的低出生率和不愿反对大规模移民意味着我们正在被更有男子气概但智力较低的种族的人所取代。这种情况已经发生了,在本世纪末之前,要么会出现一场针对“觉醒者”的民众反抗,要么我们将成为自己国家的少数派,而我们现在进行的讨论将毫无意义。

    100年后,中国将成为世界经济的主导力量,我们自己的文明很可能会被超越。正如约翰·格鲁布爵士在《帝国的命运》中所描述的那样,从欧洲到波斯的所有其他文明都发生了同样的情况:

    http://people.uncw.edu/kozloffm/glubb.pdf

    格鲁布给每个文明的寿命为250年。我们自己的文明(可以被描述为启蒙运动后的西方基督教)已接近其时代的终结——甚至 40 年前,格鲁布就看到了巴格达伊斯兰黄金时代衰落的相似之处。值得注意的是,当文明在崩溃后重建时,这种情况很少发生在同一个地方。

    目前还不清楚永久繁荣的文明是否可能,问题在于我们自己。这是一个好主意,但不太适合我们这个物种。

  103. Kiel 说:
    @John Johnson

    你说:“宣扬消极态度对任何人都没有帮助。我家附近的每个人都婚姻幸福,但我相信你根本不认为这是可能的。”

    你不知道那些紧闭的门后发生了什么,也不知道每个人背着配偶在做什么。

    另一方面,我希望你是对的,你确实生活在 1950 年代价值观的少数回廊之一中——假设 50 年代真的存在 50年代。

    我建议你看看电影《离婚公司》。

    你说:“城外好女人很多。”

    问题不是地理上的,而是文化上的,进而延伸到政治/司法上的——如果你不教育他们了解当今的游戏,你可能会对你的孩子造成伤害。

    你生活在梦境中,你认为现在家庭法庭不再对男孩不利,他们只不过是马克思主义乌托邦 ZSA 建设中从男性到女性的财富转移工具。 。

    这并不是因为我态度不好,而是因为新的现实,婚姻有 50/50 的机会让一个男人付出他所拥有的一切:他的名字、他的资产、他的工作、他的孩子,而且很可能他的生命。

    • 同意: Achmed E. Newman
    • 回复: @peterAUS
    , @Anonymous
  104. utu 说:
    @Anon

    “你为什么不对我的其他观点做出实质性回应? ” – 不要在马尔佳诺夫身上浪费时间。他可能不再知道真相在哪里结束,他的义务亲俄防御性宣传从哪里开始,因为他可能相信自己的宣传。不管怎样,你听起来是个讲道理的人,我希望像你这样的人在俄罗斯占多数。

  105. @AaronB

    这只是证明你根本不认识俄罗斯人。

  106. Miggle 说:

    这里有人见过雄性蚊子吗?

  107. 根据经济上精明的政客的说法,并在道义上得到大量精算师的支持,对男人和女人分别征税比对一对夫妇征税更有利可图。

    因此,降低工资,让两人都工作,然后平等地征税。对于政治家和精算师来说这是双赢的局面。

    让女性吸烟在社交上不那么尴尬(古老的“自由火炬”策略),烟草业就会爱死“你”。

    在自然界中[非常普遍],男性或女性必须证明一些事情,但我们,智人,我们都是赢家,这就是我们最终会输的原因......

    牛顿第三定律需要重写才能解释当今的事件。当然,这不是什么大事,但是谁来涂鸦呢?

    真正让我恼火的一件事是:女性抱怨“男人传播”。我的两腿之间没有晃来晃去的软管和两个纸板箱,但是什么 is 在那里,喜欢空气和凉爽。这些皇冠上的宝石都在外面[并且相对不受保护],这是有自然原因的。

    • 回复: @jim jones
  108. Miro23 说:

    一方面,在个人层面上,当代人普遍的女性气质会让年轻人更容易发光发热,只需付出一点努力。正如《叶隐》中所写:“现在许多男人似乎都拥有女人的脉搏。能被认为是真正男人的人很少。这意味着一个人只需付出一点点努力就可以超越别人。”锻炼身体、赚钱、组建团队、敢于保持理智,你就会蓬勃发展。

    这似乎是真的。左翼/女权主义 SJW 女性对那些被认为是她们理想的懦弱、敏感、情绪化、个人电脑“男人”不太感兴趣。

  109. obwandiyag 说:

    这不仅仅是因为她们是女性。就是他们看起来像孩子。他们中的一些人可能已经40多岁了,但他们看起来就像十几岁的孩子,可能用嘶哑的声音说起话来,天知道他们的想法是什么样的。我想象中就像一家娃娃店。或者是有桌布的茶店。

    • 回复: @Kiel
    , @Harbinger
  110. obwandiyag 说:

    我认识一位女士,她说不应该允许妇女和儿童工作,除非她们能证明她们是家庭的唯一支柱。

    你看,她是单身,和一群女性事实核查员一起工作,她们不在乎自己得到多少钱,因为她们的丈夫是养家糊口的人,而她们的收入只是拉尼亚普,你知道,为了重新——装饰浴室或游轮之类的。

    是的,一个女人这么说过。一个知道她的面包哪一面涂了黄油的人。

  111. obwandiyag 说:
    @Jim Christian

    相反。许多参军的妇女都是妓女。真实的。地点,地点,地点。

  112. Anonymous[124]• 免责声明 说:

    在阅读这篇文章之前,我必须说:《赫芬顿邮报》编辑委员会的照片看起来就像我曾经与之有过业务往来的每家分行(来自六七个不同的机构)以及我曾经服务过的每家健康诊所、医疗诊所或药房。过去十年左右的患者。当然,零售业都是女性,大多数餐饮服务业也是如此。好吧,当当今美国大学大多数本科生、研究生和专业课程(是的,甚至是硬科学)的男女基线比例约为 3:2(60% 及以上)时,人们会期望什么?将后者与企业招聘中强烈的反白人男性偏见结合起来,以确保女性、少数族裔和性越轨者的“平等”,我不知道如今白人异性恋男性如何获得有酬就业(除了像电工这样的独立承包商) 、水管工、空调技术人员和汽车修理……哦,是的,垃圾收集工总是男性)。他们几乎没有与公众接触的地方。尽管采取了平权行动,但黑人男性的情况更糟。我的整个职业生涯(现已退休)都在全国各地的高等教育旗舰大学(各个生物医学系)担任教授,可以说几乎所有黑人学生和实习生都是女性。它们并不缺乏,但该物种的雄性似乎几乎灭绝了。现在我将阅读这篇文章,看看事情是否比我想象的更糟糕。

    • 回复: @anon
  113. GMC 说:

    底线是——少数族裔总是因为工资较低而被纳入劳动力队伍,而且他们不会像他们所取代的正常男性那样“反抗腐败制度”。

  114. Anon[188]• 免责声明 说:
    @AaronB

    与情感、灵魂和精神以及所有女性特质更加协调。

    女性能量是平均的,男性能量覆盖远端——这对于情感、灵魂和精神以及其他一切,无论是身体还是精神都是如此。

  115. Ghali 说:

    标题不准确。它应该是《好男人的没落和自信女人的崛起》。

    它仍然让我们对当今世界有一个很好的了解。

  116. Anonymous[124]• 免责声明 说:
    @advancedatheist

    嗯,现在是 2020 年,在经典细菌生长曲线的再现中,我们已经处于死亡阶段的一半了。

    这是为了描绘世界范围内的某种平均人类生产力,还是它是美国特有的?我确实记下了日期。

    当中国和印度的技术/经济发展完全同步时,它们的崩溃肯定会在高峰期之后很快到来,因为世界上所需的自然资源和地方只有有限的数量来安全地存放从这些国家产生的所有有毒废物。它们的处理和渲染——直接从细菌生长曲线中获取的考虑因素。

    我对理查德·邓肯(Richard Duncan)并不熟悉,但我这一代现在已进入末期的老头子首先被冈瑟·斯坦特(Gunther Stent)在他的书《黄金时代的到来:对终结的看法》中唤醒,认识到社会崩溃的必然性(从简单的热力学原理)。进步。”自然历史出版社,1969 年。甚至更大的宇宙最终也会陷入“熵末日”,又名“热寂”。在另一个宇宙见?

  117. @AaronB

    当你对抗强大的潮流时,你是最弱的,当你顺其自然时,你是最强大的,然后按照你的愿望塑造它们。

    一致的w/ 凯文·麦克唐纳 犹太秘境

    并按照拉比的指示:

    h/t 先驱者 https://www.unz.com/article/the-church-of-england-apologises-for-talk-on-palestine/#comment-3531185

    1.关于您所说的西班牙国王有义务使您成为基督徒:请这样做,因为您不能否则。
    2.关于您关于破坏财产的命令的说法:让您的儿子商人逐渐破坏他们的基督徒。
    3.关于您对自己的生活进行的尝试所说的话:请您的儿子去当医生和药剂师,以免夺走基督徒的性命。
    4.关于他们摧毁犹太教堂的说法:使您的儿子们成为教士和牧师,以便他们摧毁教堂。
    5.至于您抱怨的其他烦恼:安排您的儿子成为拥护者和律师,并看到他们总是在国家事务中混在一起,通过将基督徒置于您的oke锁之下,您可以统治世界并向他们报仇。

    不要偏离我们给您的命令,因为您会从经验中发现,尽管您被侮辱了,但您将达到权力的现实。

    一些大犹太人谴责格特鲁德·斯坦因与维希合作以拯救自己的秘密,但事实上,她通过与天主教徒混在一起来拯救自己。事实证明这是一件非常犹太化的事情。

    • 回复: @Wally
  118. @Jim Christian

    克里斯蒂安,你可能会在那里做点什么。当这些变性人开始赢得女子选美比赛时。考虑到事情的发展,变性人可能会变得比女性更有女人味,比真正的女性更漂亮,更有吸引力,而真正的女性正在变成丑陋的胖邋遢的人。那么,当真正的男人开始对女人失去兴趣并将注意力转向异性恋时该怎么办?这最终可能导致平权行动文化的崩溃。例如,男性假装自己是女性,或者白人假装自己是黑人或印第安人,因为有 0.001% 的模糊血统,并占据了为少数族裔保留的职位和工作。

  119. @anarchyst

    我们当中知道正在发生什么的白人比大多数人意识到的要多。由于我们生活在不稳定的气氛中,有意识的美国白人保持低调。

    也许老一代人还记得所有这些快速而大规模的社会变革之前的情况。你确定这适用于那些实际上在这个新世界中长大的年轻人,他们从小就接受这些变化是不可避免的,除了博物馆和老电影中的好奇心之外,对过去没有任何记忆?他们被灌输接受一切正在发生和即将发生的事情,并在这种情况下尽其所能。但重要的是年轻人,老一代人正在带着对不同世界的记忆而消亡。

    • 回复: @anarchyst
  120. JackOH 说:
    @Diversity Heretic

    “如果他有语言学习的能力,我还会告诉他移民到波兰。”

    你敢打赌,DH,移民应该被视为年轻人、那些心怀不满或可能永远不会被抱怨的年轻人的一个想法(笑)。

    在我提交给当地出版物的一篇文章中,我写道“有无数的美国人成功地从塞满衬衫和空西装的土地搬迁到其他地方”,我特别提到东欧是一个可能的选择目的地位置,注意语言。发表的机会相当大,而且一旦发表,很可能会引起当地意见领袖的一些讨论。

    戴维·克罗克特离开了美国。被背叛的中央情报局特工瓦莱丽·普莱姆和她说真话的外交官丈夫乔·威尔逊正在考虑逃跑。离开一个不适合你、有意义的政治变革太遥远的国家,并不是什么不光彩或懦弱的行为。

    • 回复: @Diversity Heretic
  121. @John Johnson

    历史上是错误的;事实上,苏联确实采用了有限的市场经济,甚至到 1993 年为止,经济状况都进展得相当顺利。

    苏联因伊斯兰教而垮台。到 1991 年,苏联境内发生了几场内战,其中大多数是伊斯兰教与异教徒之间的战争。那时苏联领导层决定就此罢休并放弃。

  122. Anonymous[186]• 免责声明 说:
    @WorkingClass

    然而,监管有利于竞争(小企业),并将资本和工党拉入不需要福利的繁荣中产阶级。

    我其实不同意这一点。小企业的蓬勃发展首先要面对选择性执行的立法,这些立法只有在企业达到一定规模时才会发挥作用,其次还要面对非常斯巴达的立法。

    相反,当范围广泛的立法得到广泛执行时,就会产生一个额外的障碍,这对那些有处理该问题经验的人来说是有利的。这有助于大企业并鼓励特许经营,同时伤害小企业和初创企业。

  123. TKK 说:
    @El Dato

    我什至不能在一群人中观看最近的电影,因为当我看到非洲黑人大个子女人被描绘成房间里的物理学家/首席执行官/最聪明的人时,我大笑起来。然后生气。

    整个次大陆和亚文化实际上无法养活自己——热情地表现为神奇的、明智的和可敬的天才。

  124. Anonymous[395]• 免责声明 说:
    @Markus Areola

    美国女权主义应该被称为男性女权主义,这种描述可能包括这个混乱社会中几乎所有的婚姻关系。奇怪的是,在任何开放的竞争环境中,当真正的男人挑战时,女性都会退缩。 1980 年前,在 XNUMX 年伊朗救援行动中遭到上级破坏的查理·贝克威斯 (Charlie Beckwith) 上校写道,这些软弱的男人将女性当作陪衬,以遏制比他们更优秀的人。现在的情况是这样的:军队不仅给予女性,还给予酷儿和跨性别者不应有的优待,在这两种情况下,他们都被认为是军队的真正力量,而事实上,他们显然是军队最薄弱的一环。

    《编年史》杂志的托马斯·弗莱明(Thomas Fleming)几十年前写道,他开始注意到,好斗的男性女权主义女性和同性恋或招摇的男性神职人员的邪恶组合正在悄悄接管美国圣公会,因为真正的男人没有注意到。我相信,他成为了一名天主教徒,我确信他发现教会正在加大赌注,声称同性恋是通往神圣生活的首选道路,正如梵蒂冈现在所做的那样。

    一般来说,白人女性似乎被吸引并支持男同性恋者,以此作为剥夺她们自己的异性恋男人和男孩权力的一种手段。我进一步相信,这是一个非常聪明的策略的一部分,主要是由犹太人颁布的,该策略给予女性如此不值得的晋升,从而让她们对自己的男人产生蔑视的感觉。上面有人评论说,在美国,当事情进展顺利时,男人对女人来说毫无用处。

    如果没有福克斯新闻和其他宣传机器,好莱坞和 100% 正统的女同性恋者对美国白人男性的咧着嘴笑的嘲讽就不完整,他们在新闻节目中安排大声说话的女性在咖啡厅里向男性讲授整个世界。这样的女人没有羞耻感,甚至在她们最私密的性问题上也没有羞耻感。然而,这对她们来说是个笑话,因为美国女性似乎认为,将自己称为性功能或性欲的体现或在街上游行是一种赋予权力的方式。她们似乎还为在职业学校中取代自己的男性而感到加倍自豪,通常,在这些学校中,每录取一个女性,就会多出两打以上合格的年轻白人男性。最大的讽刺是,当男人们过着艰难的生活和战斗的时候,男人们会表现得很好,而这些养尊处优的女人,她们将让种族主义有色人种的反白人联盟在选举中占据优势,她们将受苦极了。

    • 回复: @Johnny Walker Read
  125. “如果没有共产主义是妇女解放不可想象的,那么没有妇女解放是共产主义也是不可想象的。” 该声明完美地概括了争取社会主义与妇女解放之间的关系-彼此之间没有任何一方是不可能的。

    同志有什么问题吗?
    https://socialistworker.org/2013/01/31/marxism-feminism-and-womens-liberation

    • 回复: @John Yuma
  126. 此外,恩格斯明确指出,对妇女的强奸和暴力从一开始就存在于家庭之中:

    男人也在家里掌管一切。女人被贬低,沦为奴仆;她成了他情欲的奴隶,仅仅是生育孩子的工具……为了确保妻子的忠诚,从而确保他孩子的父亲身份,她被无条件地交付给丈夫的权力;如果他杀了她,他只是在行使他的权利。

  127. Bill Jones 说:
    @El Dato

    续集,关于真正赢得战争的异装癖

    “杀掉党卫军!”

    • 哈哈: TKK
  128. @Anonymous

    在一本新书《贝蒂·弗里丹与女性神秘感的形成》中,史密斯学院教授丹尼尔·霍洛维茨(无亲属关系)毫无疑问地确立了这位一直将自己描绘成典型郊区家庭主妇的女性,直到她开始写这本开创性的书。事实上根本不是这样的。事实上,在她的婚前姓氏贝蒂((戈德斯坦))在《女权主义的奥秘》出版并引发现代妇女运动之前的四分之一个世纪里,她一直是一名政治活动家和共产主义左派的专业宣传员。

    是的,女权主义妈妈是一名共产主义者
    https://www.writing.upenn.edu/~afilreis/50s/friedan-per-horowitz.html

  129. anon[299]• 免责声明 说:
    @Anonymous

    如果隐秘是国王,呃,女王,那么男性假装自己是女性比反之亦然要容易得多。

    我们都是风中奇缘。

    (只要记得把马桶座圈放下即可)

    • 哈哈: Johnny Walker Read
  130. @JackOH

    谢谢你的评论。尽管我已经 60 多岁了,但我明年也会移民。丹尼尔·布恩也离开美国移居密苏里州,并在那里去世。密苏里州当时处于西班牙的宗主权之下。

  131. Che Guava 说:

    西边的左边早已是一堆粪便。

  132. Cuckatain 的议会就是这样。曾经是聪明的白人辩论的场所。

    现在,女性+黑人已将其变成了 Da Jerry Springer 秀的一集。禁止像粪便世界动物一样鼓掌、欢呼、鼓掌、呼喊的规则被废除。现在只有一群 Frumps 抱怨、欢呼、为最新一期的 SJWism 鼓掌。时间

    施普林格的不同之处在于——他很有趣,而他们则令人作呕。昨天在新闻中看到一个矮胖的乔迪鼓手穿着垃圾箱抱怨——她比嗨更宽——甚至连klo都没有。

    Ofc WM 是 WK。喝醉了饼干的上流社会白痴小丑甚至还没有任命一名白人进入内阁。我再也不会投票了——议会应该在厕所里举行!!!!

  133. Observator 说:

    天哪,所有这些有男子气概的家伙似乎都非常敏感。自布尔什维克革命以来,资本主义世界的历史一直是对人民的彻底恐惧,正是这些人民激励了几百个人,他们本质上拥有一切值得拥有的东西。他们的痴迷是对那些肮脏的下流群众的绝对控制,正如詹姆斯·麦迪逊尖锐地宣称的那样,这些群众“在生活的所有艰辛下劳动,并暗暗叹息着更平等地分配其祝福”。还有什么更好的方法可以通过破坏最令人满意的人际关系、让男人反对女人来让大众变得无能为力,我所说的并不是女权主义运动,女权主义运动是将全人类从父权一神论的有毒废物中解放出来。相反,精心策划的对妇女解放的政治抵制,就像原教旨主义宗教复兴一样,是由企业利益收买和支付的。它基于同样病态的肛门保留恐惧的世界观,这是所谓保守主义的基础,生活是一场零和游戏,自由是如此有限,以至于如果一个长期被否认平等的群体被解放,那么其他人就会被解放。将不得不放弃他们仅有的一点自由。这是非理性的胡言乱语,是最基本的恐惧:假证据看似真实。

    • 哈哈: Daniel Chieh
    • 巨魔: utu
    • 回复: @Daniel Chieh
  134. 切尔西就是那个留着胡子、长着阴茎的男人……你不知道吗?

  135. 犹太人不希望白人非伊姆妇女生孩子。犹太女权主义和所谓的妇女解放是犹太人消灭白人的工具,

    • 回复: @John Yuma
  136. pyrrhus 说:
    @advancedatheist

    父权制显然是遗传的……男人更大、更强、更快、更有创新……女人生孩子、照顾孩子、创造社会生活……这种劳动分工永远存在。

  137. anarchyst 说:
    @Commentator Mike

    对于那些“生活在当今世界”的人一无所知,你提出了一个很好的观点。那里有很多“无知”的白人。但对于千禧一代来说,至少还有一些希望。

    随着今天的白人青年成年,看到工作和其他机会理应属于他们,却被给予不合格的少数族裔,同时被剥夺了庆祝他们(和我们)白人成就的权利,他们的态度通常会发生变化。他们看到这副牌对着白棋。

    种族偏好和文化推广是不可改变的人类特征,无论支持多元文化主义和多样性的人群如何努力,都无法消除它们。它可能会被阻止,但总会回来。

    事实上,今天的千禧一代并没有我们这些年长的白人强加给我们的必要“包袱”。我们被迫接受的“种族歧视”错误的“罪责”并不存在,因为所谓的“民权”法律已经实施了 60 年——在它们的整个生命周期中。这就是“他们不知道更好”的原因之一。

    我们这些年长的白人必须传达这样的信息:整个“民权”骗局的总体目的是种族灭绝我们白人。

    问候,

  138. Alfred 说:
    @onebornfree

    很多年前,我有一个伊朗女朋友。 她有两个兄弟,但对男人知之甚少。

    有一天,我想开玩笑。 我假装感觉不舒服。 她问我出了什么问题。 我告诉过这是每个月的那个时候。 她惊讶极了,眼睛都瞪得像碟子一样。 她说的是真的。 我无法停止微笑,然后她意识到我愚弄了她,她打了我一巴掌。

  139. 听起来社会正变得越来越母权制。大多数(如果不是全部)母系社会都是原始的。如果是这样,这对未来来说不是一个好兆头。

  140. Mefobills 说:
    @WorkingClass

    资本与劳动力的斗争将多数人联合起来对抗少数人。一切都是资本的梦遗。这就是我们今天在 Capital 的设计下所处的境地。当工人们互相斗争时,资本家成为寡头,然后成为封建领主。

    金融资本主义创造了债务工具。新债务以新的银行信贷作为抵押,新的银行信贷偿还旧债务。这让债券持有人感到高兴。

    每50年左右就会出现一个债务周期。用圣经术语来说,是 7 x 7 = 49 年。我们现在正在用新债务来延长旧债务,而旧债务正在使高利贷呈指数级增长,为富豪统治提供资金。

    第二次世界大战通过财政部的无债支出偿还了以前的债务。在美国,这种形式的支出来自预算中的细目项目,用于新工厂、设备和战争物资。战争的余波留下了无债务的基础设施,这些基础设施继续推动了战后的繁荣以及消费品的新债务周期。

    这种循环在 60 年代末和 70 年代中期逐渐消失,银行家类型引导女性进入劳动力市场。

    妇女实际上成为新的债务人。新债还清旧债。

    现在请注意!金融资本主义执行了刚才解释的债务机制,但工业资本主义却没有。

    工业资本创造主权债务并将其新的国家信贷引导至生产资料。这类资本只追求新的工业和生产,而不是利用妇女和儿童来偿还旧金融衍生的债务。

    当人们拿出旧的资本主义谣言,而不看资本主义背后的金钱时,这会变得非常烦人。

    金钱是资本,厂房和设备是资本,劳动力是资本的一种形式。

    正如我常说的,如果你不理解金钱,那么你就是不理解。你不了解历史,你对现实做出错误的假设。

    E-Michael Jones 很好地解释了我们的(((朋友)))如何打破家庭和使用性是一项革命性的行为。我们的朋友则是金融资本家,他们持有针对世界的债务工具。如果你再深入一点,你还会发现普选投票是由(((通常嫌疑人)))资助的。

    好的?这总是与金钱有关,大多数糟糕的西方运动都有一个根本原因,即一群“特殊”的金钱驱动的掠夺者毫无问题地拆毁其他人所建立的东西。他们为了获取租金和自我扩张而拆毁和破坏。这群掠夺者通过他们拥有的媒体进行催眠和辩证法。资本主义与共产主义,两者是同一事物的元素。辩证法始终是资本主义与共产主义,仿佛别无选择。永远记住,布尔什维克的存在是由金融资本资助的。

    拥有主权货币(国家信贷)的工业资本主义——或者某种形式的国家社会主义作为一种经济和政治形式运作良好,这种形式的社会组织将在其范围内保护白人。主权形式的货币与美联储纸币和私人银行信贷不同。

    http://www.sovereignmoney.eu

  141. AaronB 说:
    @James N. Kennett

    觉醒者通过使用我所描述的方法部分地取得了成功。嘲笑只对那些认为你是他们中的一员的人有效——即群体内的人。否则嘲笑很容易被驳回。没有人关心他们完全不同意并视为疯子的人的嘲笑。

    因此,首先你必须通过至少部分同意他们的观点来建立你作为团体成员的资格——然后,在适当的时候,嘲笑可能会产生影响。

    来自另类右翼的嘲笑将产生零效果——更糟糕的是,它会增强左派的力量,让他们有一种敌人的感觉。像 Vox Day 这样的人是左派最好的朋友,就像反犹太主义者是犹太人最好的朋友一样。每个群体都需要彼此并从中受益。但像 Vox Day 这样的人靠他们的表演赚钱——要小心这样的人。

    但这里还有一个更重要的问题需要说明。有一个叫做“时代”的东西——它由一百万种我们无法控制、我们无法理解的力量组成。情报的任务是洞察时代的本质和趋势并采取相应的行动。

    有些时候,战略撤退和等待时机是最好的出路。在我看来,这显然是一个这样的时刻。最好的做法是像罗德·德雷尔的本尼迪克特选项一样——战略性撤退,直到时机再次有利,并支撑能量,而不是浪费地浪费能量,进行毫无意义的轻率攻击,撞上坚固的墙壁,而这些墙壁不给力。方式。

    事实上,由于我们无法理解和控制的原因,有时某些类型的男性占主导地位——这就是事实。在这些时期,根本不可能取得任何进展,因为根本不存在材料。人们不会自我毁灭,而是保存能量并耐心等待,直到时代不可避免地开始改变——他们总是这样做。

    • 回复: @James N. Kennett
  142. Rurik 说:
    @AaronB

    当你对抗强大的潮流时,你是最弱的;当你随波逐流时,你是最强的,然后 根据您的愿望塑造它们。
    ...
    但那些微妙、适应性强、聪明的另类右翼人士在哪里呢?

    [我的重点]

    有一个另类右翼人士经营着一个网站,介绍如何准确地完成你所建议的事情,直到他们因为他太((精明))而将他关闭。

    它的名字叫Chateau Heartiste,网上只留下了它的外壳。

    他的观点是,我们生活在一个((强加的))大众精神病的时代(显然是为了毁灭我们),但我们男人可以让它为我们服务,如果我们聪明的话。

    科学是关键,是对人性的基本理解,尤其是“仓鼠”的本质(引导女性精神的潜意识进化力量)。

    因此,当(((Globohomo)))席卷西方,我们的少女迷失在有毒的议论海洋中时,作为男人,我们有责任以微妙而积极的方式激怒他们的仓鼠,并提供一个英勇、自信的男人交给他们,交给 她们穿过麻木的女性气质的迷宫,收获真正的幸福和满足的果实。

    • 回复: @Sam Coulton
  143. John Yuma 说:

    当女性获得投票权时,就迎来了进步主义的曙光。她们无法控制自己的母性本能。

    • 回复: @TKK
  144. Harbinger 说:

    犹太人赋予女性权力,因为他们知道她们情感上的不逻辑会将西方文明彻底粉碎。并非“所有”女性,但绝大多数女性都没有常识。由于女性受内心的支配,她们无法做出理性的决定。
    举个例子:
    如果一个人负责一个村庄,一群外来者试图进入,在某种世界末日之后,每个人都死于一种神秘的疾病,他不会允许他们进入。他可能会给他们必要的食物,但是村庄的安全比新来者的安全更重要。如果一个女人负责,她会让他们进来,特别是如果队伍里有孩子的话。她这样做,就会感染整个村子。妇女们用心思考,在“海滩上死婴”惨败之后,她们在报纸上看到这一事件后,大声疾呼让移民涌入她们的国家,无论犯罪记录、医疗状况等如何。

    同性恋和跨性别疯狂的宣扬再次得到了女性的大力支持。如果父亲发现自己的孩子是同性恋,他会断绝关系,而母亲则不会,并会纵容他的性选择。我认识一位有 4 个孩子的单亲妈妈。她的一个儿子是同性恋,她允许他的男朋友在他家过夜。他还不到 16 岁。她已经 30 多岁了。另一方面,我的父亲,如果他还活着的话,已经90多岁了,甚至在我21岁的时候不允许我在家里有一个女朋友!如果我说“爸爸,我是同性恋”,我就会被赶出家门。

    今天的女性拥有令人难以置信的力量,因为她们非常容易被操纵。他们本质上是自私、物质至上、反复无常的生物,为了得到自己想要的东西,他们会很乐意破坏所有的道德和伦理。典型的例子是进入色情行业的年轻女性(和年长女性)的巨大崛起。它不再有任何社会耻辱。这些年轻女性只关心自己,不考虑父母对她们选择职业的感受。对于一个父亲来说,知道他的女儿在电影中做令人恶心的性行为,一定很可怕,但他们又不在乎。这些年轻女性在一部可能需要 1,500 分钟以上拍摄的色情电影中拍摄一个场景可以赚到 45 美元左右。他们没有道德。他们的看法是这样的; “当我可以拍色情片并赚取 12 倍的收入时,为什么要以每小时 1,000 美元的价格从事零售业呢?”

    与其说这是女性行为的改变。更重要的是,女性已经摆脱了对社会的责任。这种行为是所有女性都有的。它总是在那里,在里面,休眠着,随时准备出来。犹太人用大量金钱、权力和成功的诱惑来解除妇女对社会的义务,这与魔鬼用知识树上的苹果引诱夏娃没有什么不同。如果我晚上出去,就会有更多的女人出去喝醉。他们中的大多数人都很胖,这是因为他们喝了大量的含糖鸡尾酒。这会导致争吵,然后引发争吵。然后,你还可以加上女同性恋的增长以及随之而来的对同性恋的接受,异性恋女性在女同性恋、双性恋和异性关系之间摇摆不定。

    与父权制中的一块白热金属相比,母权制在犹太人手中就像一块腻子。 犹太人无法控制西方男人,所以他通过满足女人的一切欲望来控制女人。

    可悲的现实是 M恩阿雷 G正在 T继承者 Own W今天啊。这种“发生”,而不是一场运动,是女性拥有不受限制的权力的一夫多妻制行为的直接结果。出于显而易见的原因,男性远离与女性的关系。你很容易因为虚假的强奸指控而受到牵连,而#MeToo 的礼貌让你的职业生涯因工作场所的性侵犯指控而被毁。结果,白人男性的出生率正在下降。当然,非白人也在西方效仿,但在他们自己的国家却没有(日本除外,日本也发生了这种情况)。
    约翰·B·卡尔霍恩 (John B Calhoun) 在 70 年代初的“老鼠乌托邦”实验中预言了这一现实。研究表明,随着种群数量的增长,雌性老鼠在老鼠社会中获得了更多的权力,雄性老鼠封闭了自己并停止交配,决定自我修饰,被称为“美丽的老鼠”。另一方面,妇女们互相争斗,人们开始死亡。

    女性的角色不是领导,而是跟随和服从男性。 西方却发生了完全相反的情况,结果自我毁灭。 一部又一部的电影、一部又一部的电视剧都在诋毁白人男性和白人父母。 女性被视为强者,领导者和男性被嘲笑。
    我建议大家去 YouTube 上观看“Black Pilled”,因为他在剖析好莱坞电影及其所传达的信息方面做得非常出色。

    妇女人生的目的是生育孩子,并将他们培养成有道德、有道德的社会成员。他们没有履行对人类唯一的职责。他们决定要成为男性(字面意思),出去,喝酒,喝醉,打架和控制。然后他们的结局很悲惨,四十多岁,没有家庭,中年危机,碰壁了,颜值全没了,性市场价值一落千丈,注定成为酒鬼,一夜情被抓,过一辈子孤独(现在在西方女性中是一种流行病),一间有很多猫的公寓,然后被卖掉以支付老人之家的护理费用。

    女人已经不再是女人了。就是这么简单,这就是为什么西方社会一落千丈的原因。

  145. Rurik 说:
    @AaronB

    自由是内在的,而不是外在的。

    告诉朱利安

  146. John Yuma 说:
    @Ilyana_Rozumova

    是的,我们确实希望白人“非犹太人”生孩子——但只生女儿。

  147. 解决方法很简单。

    轰炸以色列,逮捕、审判并判他们犯有叛国罪和反人类罪,不是全部*,而是大约 20.000 人,并将他们关在太平洋的一个岛屿上。
    其他人都会恢复理智。

    *那些人造成了我们今天生活的混乱。

    PS
    看着《赫芬顿邮报》“编辑人员”的照片,让我想知道为什么我们今天会陷入困境。
    顺便说一句,这个丑陋且不色情的群体中有多少犹太人?

  148. Rurik 说:
    @Justvisiting

    关键是把唤醒运动变成一个圆形的行刑队:
    ...
    Reconquistas vs 白人 CA 唤醒了人们

    我曾经听说加州的一些火灾是由收复失地运动(墨西哥人)的军队纵火的。为了赶走“偷走”他们土地的白人。

    如果是这样,并且如果一个住在圣巴巴拉豪宅的富有的白人自由主义者(要求无限制地从第三世界移民到所有工人阶级、白人、立交桥社区),应该失败 他的 这里是对白人怀有怨恨的墨西哥移民的家园——那么这肯定有一定的偶然性,不是吗?

  149. Emslander 说:

    我们可能认为这太过分了,是一种个人侮辱。年轻人选择不上大学,主要是因为大学已经成为无用的阉割者。他们中的许多人都在寻找先锋精神,与其说是流浪到无人定居的土地,不如说是在同性恋和无知的妇女所塑造的毫无价值的文明中间探索这片无人定居的土地。您公寓楼附近的街头小贩可能相当于边远地区的捕猎者。换句话说,年轻人做男人做的事,他们谋生尽可能独立于平权行动世界令人窒息的非人化。

    看看这会导致什么。大学必须提供豪华住宿和卖淫机会,以吸引女孩进入原本不自然的学术界。女性不是天生的学者。少数女性先驱思想家通常是一些男性思想家的作品的衍生品,这些男性不具备社交技能来推广自己的发现。所以,学院和大学已经注定了自己的失败。在不久的将来,去一些昂贵的生活场所聆听和学习自由主义原则的想法将被视为像马拉松舞蹈比赛一样愚蠢。

    同样,花一生时间在满层隔间森林中与剪纸作斗争也不会有任何商业功能。如今,律师事务所已成为不幸女性的藏身之处,她们选择上法学院,因为她们认为在那里可以找到富有的男人来狩猎和结婚。它们是为数不多的偶尔需要盛装打扮的地方。

    我的观点是,追逐二战以来发展起来的、永远不可能持久的经济模式是没有用的。对于年轻男人来说,最好的事情就是等待悲惨的现实降临到所有那些愚蠢到无法识别趋势的女人身上,当她们在真正的男人安营扎寨的新荒野中寻找意义时,享受再次生育。这些拓荒者将拥有他们梦寐以求的所有交配伙伴,因为他们将是唯一拥有生存技能的人。

    拥抱崩溃。

  150. 话又说回来——这里的主题是什么?这个帖子让我想起了翻拍的法国经典《朱尔斯与吉姆》,其中有句令人难忘的台词:他们在寻求答案,而他们仍然不知道问题。

  151. 在我忘记之前……我只来得及读第一部分,并检查托夫勒(阿尔文和海蒂)后来是否提到了《未来的冲击》,我错误地记得这是一本 60 年代的书,而不是 1970 年的书(与杰曼·格里尔的《女太监》)。我记得麦肯锡公司的一位高级合伙人在一次晚宴上谈论了这本书。那么,,,当我继续读下去时,,,,我会得到1970年的预付款吗?

  152. @Prester John

    像这样。这个可怜的家伙无法接受有关他对 LGBT 群体不公平的建议。噢,太甜了。如此情绪化。

    • 回复: @Justvisiting
  153. 啊,我可能已经OT了。现在,我可以通过提供一个简单的通用规则来解决变性人问题来弥补这一点:“女厕所里没有阴茎”。

    • 回复: @Bardon Kaldian
  154. Poco 说:
    @RadicalCenter

    这是很好的建议。 1995年,我大学毕业,很快就找到了工作,尝试了整个办公室保姆路线,但无法忍受。一年后,我成为一名学徒电工,现在拥有一家成功的电力承包公司。结婚了,有了孩子,有了孙子,还有更多的事情即将发生。对我来说,这就是生活的意义。这是我做过的最好的决定。体力劳动是很辛苦的,尤其是早年,但是体力劳动有什么大不了的呢?

  155. @Harbinger

    你描述得很好。这些妇女被操纵以达到某些目的。但女性的许多倾向和性情同样可以用于其他目的。

    妇女们用心思考,在“海滩上死婴”惨败之后,她们在报纸上看到这一事件后,大声疾呼让移民涌入她们的国家,无论犯罪记录、医疗状况等如何。

    这就是他们所看到的和被告知的。如果他们看到自己国家境内恐怖袭击和移民犯罪的儿童和妇女受害者的可怕图像,以及罪犯需要被赶走的信息,那么同样的感觉就会产生不同的效果。

  156. @AaronB

    不应允许妇女在任何级别的政府中投票或担任公职。他们愚蠢得无可救药。妇女解放=从真理中解放出来,有权保留关于性别和种族等的明显谎言。
    比照。格洛丽亚·斯泰纳姆(Gloria Steinem)的:“真相会让你自由,但首先它会让你生气!”
    解放的女性是对真相感到愤怒的女性。但只有真相才能让白人获得自由……

  157. Kiel 说:
    @obwandiyag

    “这不仅仅是因为她们是女性。就是他们看起来像孩子。他们中的一些人可能已经40多岁了,但他们看起来就像十几岁的孩子,可能用嘶哑的声音说起话来,天知道他们的想法是什么样的。我想象中就像一家娃娃店。或者是有桌布的茶店。”

    如果您认为这是食品和食品容器中模拟雌激素的化学物质以及对年轻男性荷尔蒙发育产生负面影响的针对性疫苗的结果,那么我同意。

    如果你的评论只是另一种男性羞辱策略,即你那个时代的男人恰好是真正的男人,那么你就是一派胡言,也是问题的一部分。

    这一切都不是偶然的,这是有目的地创造一个糟糕的母权制,为他们的有乳房和鸡巴的混蛋山羊神服务。

  158. ricpic 说:

    从未有过 DIS有兴趣的女人。

  159. Wally 说:
    @SolontoCroesus

    格特鲁德·斯坦因并没有“通过与维希合作来拯救自己”,因为所谓的“灭绝犹太人”已被证明是一个谎言。

  160. 文化马克思主义是犹太媒体权力的一个功能。
    这种力量是一个泡沫,随着媒体的谎言、谎言和谎言,它正在破裂,以至于变得无关紧要。
    邪教马克思主义者将紧随其后。
    甩掉包袱。

  161. FvS 说:
    @AaronB

    像一个真正的犹太人一样说话。不过,每当白人尝试这种策略并受到批评时,他们就没有大屠杀牌可拿。尽管如此,我确实同意那些持不同政见的右翼应该不惜一切代价获得权力,即使这意味着撒谎和隐瞒。

  162. Harbinger 说:
    @obwandiyag

    “这不仅仅是因为她们是女性。就是他们看起来像孩子。他们中的一些人可能已经40多岁了,但他们看起来就像十几岁的孩子,可能用嘶哑的声音说起话来,天知道他们的想法是什么样的。我想象中就像一家娃娃店。或者是有桌布的茶店。”

    造成这种情况的原因有很多。
    我建议您(实际上是每个人)观看我最近发现的一位 YouTuber,名叫 Devon Stack。他的频道是 Black Pilled。他评论电影并告诉观众他们真正在宣传什么,即向你灌输什么。
    他的一段视频解释了您对女性和老年人的说法。该视频名为 美国人的命运.

    然而,40多岁的女性却表现得很少女,因为她们大多数人对自己的生活不满意,工作没有出路,没有伴侣,没有孩子,还有老年可以期待,单身生活,公寓里满是猫,孤独。这些女性已经“碰壁”了,也就是说,她们已经过了性市场价值的巅峰,不再能够生育,她们的身体开始走下坡路,不再受到男人的关注。她们是隐形的,被男人“幽灵化”。因此,她们的穿着比实际年龄年轻20岁,因此有“羊穿成羔羊”的说法,以拼命地试图吸引年轻男性,或任何有资源照顾她们并阻止上述不可避免的情况的男性。
    这就是女权主义赋予女性的自由——外出、与女孩聚会、喝醉、随心所欲地进行随意性行为的所有自由,并在二三十岁时充当享乐主义的妓女,过着放荡和堕落的生活。这些40多岁的女性大多身材走样,除了给男人提供一个停放阴茎的地方之外什么也没有。不知何故,她们认为自己可以为男人提供与二十多岁的女人相同的东西,甚至更多。他们不这样做,但女权主义让他们相信自己这样做。因此,好莱坞将迎合这些女性,制作有关与年长女性约会的电影等。

    我刚才所描述的是对西方文化大规模攻击的直接结果。这在二战之前从未存在过。与他人同居、未婚发生性关系和生孩子仍然是一种可耻的行为。在酒吧进行社交活动的女性和“性工作者”一样,也受到不悦。现在已经来了个 2 度了。无论如何,这肯定是不自然的。
    这是老年单身女性意识到自己现在已经精疲力尽、老了、没人真正想要的直接结果。过去,到了那个年纪,他们就已经结婚了,结婚时间可能有 10 到 15 年,育有十几岁的儿子和女儿,甚至可能更长。他们有孙子可以期待,更重要的是有人照顾他们、照顾他们、过来看看他们是否还好。他们有家人。如今,这些女人一无所有。

    女权主义向女性兜售了她们可以拥有一切的谎言。他们只是从来没有读过这样的小字:“你将独自变老,孤独,很可能会自杀”(这种情况在西方正在迅速增长)。
    对女性来说更糟糕的是,由于家庭法庭对女性有令人厌恶的偏见,男性正在远离婚姻和人际关系,这使得女性更难建立恋爱关系。前几天,我读到,美国的一些女性正在起诉一位与她同居了大约三个月的前男友,并索要他的一些财产,作为使用她阴道的可悲的报酬。正是这样的故事和女性的掠夺策略,只会在性别之间造成更大的分歧。这当然正是(((他们)))想要的。

    这是不自然的。这是非常不自然的。由于有毒的女权主义,男性正在远离女性。女性看到了这一点,并尽其所能地渗透到尽可能多的男性群体中,打着反女权主义的牌,所有这些都是为了建立某种关系,但男性可以看到他们的到来,深知婚姻无非就是国家批准的盗窃女性银行账户和资产的行为。

    这些女人很绝望,会不遗余力地寻找男人并建立关系。如今,对于大多数女性来说,婚姻只不过是通往离婚的道路,并通过窃取丈夫的财务来获得现成的养老金。男性显然正在避免与女性结婚和同居。
    情况很严峻,但这是经过精心设计的。他们的目标是欧洲人,而不是所有其他种族群体。

    • 回复: @ricpic
    , @obwandiyag
  163. peterAUS 说:
    @Kiel

    .

    问题不是地理上的,而是文化上的,进而延伸到政治/司法上的——如果你不教育他们了解当今的游戏,你可能会对你的孩子造成伤害。

    你生活在梦境中,你认为现在家庭法庭不再对男孩不利,他们只不过是马克思主义乌托邦 ZSA 建设中从男性到女性的财富转移工具。 。

    这并不是因为我态度不好,而是因为新的现实,婚姻有 50/50 的机会让一个男人付出他所拥有的一切:他的名字、他的资产、他的工作、他的孩子,而且很可能他的生命。

    是的。

  164. @Andrei Martyanov

    这位被提名者在纯白乌托邦过着受庇护的生活。

    他可能在教堂里被告知邪恶存在,但他并不真正相信——直到那个“教学时刻”出现在电影中。

    他刚刚了解到,并非所有人类生而平等——有些人生来就是为了毁灭其他人。

    • 回复: @Andrei Martyanov
  165. @Twodees Partain

    加伯德的照片通常被媒体篡改。
    她是一名跨性别男变女。牙弓、颈部(喉结缩小手术的痕迹)、眉骨等。
    请记住,许多印度教男性一开始就没有那么阳刚。 “她”就是其中之一。
    一旦一个人学会了解剖学,就无法回头。
    好莱坞从一开始就一直在扭曲女性和男性的观念。

    • 回复: @Bardon Kaldian
  166. @Justvisiting

    我每天都这样做。

    如果我和中国人交谈……好吧,也许我会提到印度人并说一些温和的贬义的话。

    如果我和印度人交谈……我可能会对中国人说类似的话。

    我们都知道这两个群体都讨厌黑人……所以这也总是一个简单的话题。

    如果与我交谈的是穆斯林,我一定会贬低激进的女权主义和荡妇。

    所有群体都不喜欢白人自由主义者和 SJW。

    颠覆体制。别再试图阻止小丑世界了,这是婴儿潮一代对过去的想象,现在已经不复存在了。正如 AaronB 所说,顺其自然。如果我们有“多样性”,那么就让我们充分利用它。

  167. @kerdasi amaq

    说得好。我自己也一直这么认为。

  168. 传统的亚伯拉罕宗教强制实行父权管理,如果实行的话,问题就会得到解决。

    但是,当然,它缺乏所有价值,因为它“只是一个神话”。或者说,理由是……

    那好吧。由于缺乏信念,西方正在崩溃也就不足为奇了。

    • 回复: @Alexandros
  169. anonymous[191]• 免责声明 说:
    @AaronB

    “因此,正面对抗和顽固抵抗的另类右翼计划是愚蠢的,注定会失败。历史上从来没有成功过。

    但那些微妙、适应性强、聪明的另类右翼人士在哪里呢?到目前为止,为什么这样的人这么少?他们怎么这么傻?”

    你只听说过那些愚蠢的,聪明的则隐藏在系统中,逐渐改变它并重定向它。

    • 回复: @Sam Coulton
  170. anonymous[191]• 免责声明 说:
    @AaronB

    我们可以从停止使用“woke”和“wokeness”这个可怕的黑人词开始。这是一个听起来很可怕的文盲词,无法传达任何意义。为什么不使用正确的英语单词唤醒或照亮。白人不应该使用黑人的行话。

    • 回复: @Sunshine
  171. Mike Tre [又名“MikeatMikedotMike”] 说:
    @Achmed E. Newman

    库尔特更擅长用左派自己的话来让左派显得愚蠢。马尔金是一位更好的研究员/调查员。

    • 回复: @Achmed E. Newman
  172. @Justvisiting

    这位被提名者在纯白乌托邦过着受庇护的生活。

    这几乎适用于绝大多数所谓的美国“精英”,给予和带走很少的军事情报人员,你就会得到一群被宠坏的孩子,他们从未经历过任何程度的不适,更不用说克服严重逆境的必要性了,如果不是死亡,你就明白了。这就是“统治”美国的人。周六,从他们的活动中取消高尔夫和鹅肝酱,世界就会压垮他们。这就是为什么美国表现得像一个任性的孩子,因为它是由任性的孩子统治的。

    • 回复: @Daniel Rich
  173. res 说:

    然而,为了我们年轻的白人男孩——他们已经因为不可避免地无法实现平等而成为替罪羊,他们需要在社会中以自豪和自信的人的身份占据一席之地——我将简要介绍性别差异以及什么性别关系可能看起来像一个健康的社会。

    同样,我认为值得为各种性别差异的程度提供参考。尽管恕我直言,偏向“男性和女性相同”的观点,但本文是我找到的有关此数据的最佳单一来源。表 1 包含大量(相当于三页纸!)使用 Cohen d 表达的差异,并且该论文得到了很好的引用(IIRC 我发现 Hyde 选择报告参考文献中的一些结果存在一些偏差,因此值得更深入地检查)。
    性别相似性假说 (海德,2005)
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16173891
    https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/amp-606581.pdf

    我认为这段摘录很好地总结了观察到的最大差异。

    如前所述,性别相似假设并没有断言男性和女性在每个领域都绝对相似。 应该承认例外情况——性别差异中等或较大的领域。
    表 1 中最大的性别差异在于运动表现领域,特别是投掷速度 (d 2.18) 和投掷距离 (d 1.98) 等指标(Thomas & French,1985)。这些差异在青春期后尤其明显,此时肌肉质量和骨骼大小的性别差距扩大。
    存在巨大性别差异的第二个领域是一些(但不是全部)性行为衡量标准(Oliver & Hyde,1993)。在手淫发生率以及对随意、不负责任的关系中的性态度方面,性别差异惊人地大。相比之下,报告的性满意度的性别差异接近于零。
    在多项荟萃分析中,攻击行为反复显示出中等程度的性别差异(Archer,2004;Eagly & Steffen,1986;Hyde,1984,1986)。身体攻击行为的性别差异尤其可靠,并且比言语攻击行为的性别差异更大。人们对关系攻击性方面的性别差异进行了大量宣传,其中女孩得分更高(例如,Crick & Grotpeter,1995)。根据 Archer (2004) 的荟萃分析,通过直接观察测量,间接或关系攻击对性别差异的影响大小为 -0.45,但同伴评分仅为 -0.19,自我报告为 -0.02,并且 -教师报告为 0.13。因此,关于关系攻击的性别差异程度的证据并不明确。

    这是一项关于兴趣性别差异的元研究:
    男人与物,女人与人:兴趣性别差异的荟萃分析
    https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2009-19763-004
    https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/47af/4a7e87267aba681fb6971590ec80effce0c3.pdf

    摘要:

    在当前的荟萃分析中,对 Holland (1959, 1997) 类别(现实型、调查型、艺术型、社会型、进取型和传统型)、Prediger (1982) 物-人与数据进行了职业兴趣中性别差异的大小和变异性的检验。 – 想法维度和 STEM(科学、技术、工程和数学)兴趣领域。使用了 47 个利息清单的技术手册,产生了 503,188 名受访者。结果表明,男性更喜欢与物打交道,女性更喜欢与人打交道,这对物-人维度产生了很大的影响(d = 0.93)。男性表现出更强的现实(d = 0.84)和研究(d = 0.26)兴趣,女性表现出更强的艺术(d = -0.35),社会(d = -0.68)和传统(d = -0.33)兴趣。在工程(d = 1.11)、科学(d = 0.36)和数学(d = 0.34)兴趣的更具体衡量指标上也发现了有利于男性的性别差异。不同利息库存的平均效应大小各不相同,范围从 0.08 到 0.79。基于职业声誉的兴趣清单的质量与性别差异的大小没有差异性相关。效应大小的调节因素包括兴趣清单项目开发策略、评分方法、理论框架以及年龄和队列的样本变量。应用一些项目开发策略可以大大减少性别差异。本研究表明,兴趣可能在 STEM 领域的性别职业选择和性别差异中发挥关键作用。

  174. TKK 说:
    @John Yuma

    他们在工作场所非常恶毒。我看不到任何指导或母鸡般的善意,除非是针对一个有魅力的男人或亲戚。

    相反,女法官对待年轻漂亮的女律师非常可怕,除非她的丈夫/父亲/亲戚是一个可能影响她生活的有权势的男人。

    事实上,女性司法人员和女老板每天给数百万人的生活带来痛苦。有一天对你阿谀奉承,第二天就疏远、专断、嫉妒、小气、捉摸不透。

    即使他们在法律上有能力,但他们无法(拒绝?)控制自己反复无常的情绪,这让他们的每一次出现都成为一个大问号。尽管听起来很笼统,但我发现大多数女律师都患有精神疾病。

    公设辩护人除外。她们通常是很酷的嬉皮小妞——悠闲自在,只需要这份工作为孩子们提供良好的健康保险。

  175. Sunshine 说:

    天啊,对这一切都是如此。我是一个女人,但显然我不是一个“正常”的女人,否则我就不会在这里。女人是周围的噩梦,尤其是当你是一个不符合当前社会习俗的女人时。但我一直看着他们,想知道为什么,仅仅因为我和他们有相同的生殖系统,我就应该感受到任何形式的团结或分享他们的观点。因为我没有,从来没有,也永远不会。

    我热爱言论自由,在我的一生中,很多次因为我捍卫言论自由而受到人身威胁。那好吧。但这并不是最糟糕的部分。我讨厌女性的一点是消极的攻击性。背后的狡猾的手低语和眼神交流,以及他们如何让你知道他们在谈论你,但以一种你无法面对他们并让他们当面说出来的方式。

    他们想要无情地摧毁任何不顺从的女人的自尊。最有趣的是,我已经结婚了,我的丈夫显然喜欢并享受我的陪伴(我发廊里的女人们总是目瞪口呆,但她们并不吝啬,可能是因为我付钱),尽管我并不漂亮或者化浓妆(如果有的话),打扮得像一个谦虚但色盲的巫师。当然,还有一群孩子。

    他们就是不明白。我不是一个球破坏者或女权主义者或试图证明任何事情。我只是一个妻子和母亲,也是一个病态的不墨守成规者,主要是因为我看到人们的墨守成规是疯狂的、自杀性的、邪恶的和毁灭灵魂的。你可能认为他们会注意到自己不快乐,也许会改变自己的方式,但事实并非如此。她们加倍努力,想知道为什么男人不想要她们。谁能责怪那些人呢?我丈夫之所以娶我,并不是因为我有工作、有钱。他想要的不是室友,而是妻子。他得到了一个。

    这就是这一切的归结。女人很痛苦,但不能也不会承认。她们不会承认她们的“权利”和女权主义摧毁了她们的幸福。所以它会继续下去。

    我真诚地、无讽刺地希望并祈祷“父权制”崛起并夺回控制权。姐妹情谊是一个谎言,我不想与它有任何关系。我更不想与它所产生的阉割保姆状态有任何关系。我想看到人们在公共场合抽烟、开枪、把房子漆成紫色等等。我喜欢凌乱的自由和强化 F。请男人们勇敢地面对这些女人。我努力,但我有什么力量呢?大多数情况下我只是将它们空白。别浪费时间让我感到自卑,赢得这场比赛的唯一方法就是不玩。

    用萨特的话来说,“其他女人就是地狱”。我厌倦了生活在人间地狱。让它停下来!

    • 回复: @Miro23
    , @Sick of Orcs
  176. Sunshine 说:
    @anonymous

    同意。我拒绝使用他们的术语,也不消费他们的文化。我是一个骄傲的白人女性,而不是一个多嘴的黑人,我的行为也像这样。尊严。在美国黑人崇拜中,这是一个令人遗憾的不被理解的概念,还有谦虚、努力工作、美德、自尊、节制、贞洁和一长串其他概念。

    如果你了解自己是谁并且有强烈的自我意识,你就可以抵抗所有的社会压力。为什么任何理智和聪明的人都会环顾四周,看到他们在每个城市和城镇里无精打采的堕落者,然后说“哎呀,我想成为那样的人!”?不,谢谢。我宁愿成为一个冷漠的孤独怪人,也不愿成为“现代”美国人。

    但老实说,我认为真正独立思考的能力是非常罕见的。也许这是遗传的。

    • 回复: @peterAUS
    , @ricpic
    , @ThreeCranes
  177. SafeNow 说:

    如今,年轻人很难找到莫尔斯探长所说的“更可爱的品质”。例如,我会包括“公平”;也就是说,摆脱睾丸激素驱动的不公平和错误竞争的持续主观性。共情。同情。支持。正如伊恩·弗莱明所说,适合搭配酱汁。等等。很难知道该去哪里寻找。但我肯定会对申诉研究专业敬而远之。

  178. TKK 说:
    @kerdasi amaq

    如果你需要外国实体在几十年内永不停歇地注入数万亿美元, 饮用水最低热量摄入 当你拥有巨大的自然资源时——这怎么能不是一场失败的比赛呢?

    人们不能一直指责殖民化,因为利比里亚和埃塞俄比亚从来没有这样过——而且它们都是混乱的、反乌托邦的失败国家。

    非洲的主要问题是西方帝国主义。

    中国在撒哈拉以南非洲主导,阿拉伯人主导北方。中国人憎恶非洲在执行最琐碎的任务时所存在的系统性腐败、血仇、强奸儿童、艾滋病毒流行、向独裁者家庭提供外国援助以资助路虎揽胜和劳力士车队。

    这就是非洲国家应该渴望成为西方社会的模仿者,因为西方人认为自己更优越

    您能否可信地说您更愿意住在安哥拉或刚果民主共和国,而不是卢塞恩、柏林甚至迈阿密?

    • 同意: Mark G.
  179. Sam Coulton [又名“ SSSM Coulton”] 说:
    @Rurik

    为什么?他们一个人更快乐。

    唯一的选择就是用枪指着他们跪下并强奸他们。

    • 回复: @bruce county
    , @HammerJack
  180. Sam Coulton [又名“ SSSM Coulton”] 说:
    @anonymous

    没有证据表明这种情况正在发生。

  181. Sam Coulton [又名“ SSSM Coulton”] 说:
    @Anon

    “历史上的斯拉夫”?俄罗斯远东地区和俄罗斯中部是中亚人和中国人去的地方。这些地区最近才被斯拉夫人殖民。

  182. @AaronB

    觉醒者通过使用我所描述的方法部分地取得了成功。嘲笑只对那些认为你是他们中的一员的人有效——即群体内的人。否则嘲笑很容易被驳回。没有人关心他们完全不同意并视为疯子的人的嘲笑。

    因此,首先你必须通过至少部分同意他们的观点来建立你作为团体成员的资格——然后,在适当的时候,嘲笑可能会产生影响。

    我能理解其中的意义——但这并不意味着每个人都必须使用这种策略。你不需要成为朝臣才能指出皇帝没有穿衣服——即使是一个孩子也能做到。

    如果说有什么乐观的理由的话,那就是公众并不完全同意觉醒者的观点——至少在移民和变性问题上是这样。我们永远不会改变《纽约时报》记者的想法,但我们不需要这样做:我们可以直接向公众呼吁,为此目的,嘲笑仍然是一个强大的武器,同时让觉醒者遵守自己的标准。

    几年前,Dalrock 曾对此进行过讨论。一位新的女性评论者加入了该博客,并建议如果我们希望“manosphere”想法“获得关注”,我们需要做什么(例如“调低语气”)。我不记得讨论的细节,但 IIRC 得出的结论是我们将 决不要 在颠覆时代精神的意义上获得牵引力;但我们可以通过向男人和女人提供有关社会如何运作的事实来颠覆它。

  183. peterAUS 说:
    @Sunshine

    明智的评论。

    至于

    ......我宁愿成为一个冷酷的怪人,也不愿成为“现代”美国人。

    但老实说,我认为真正独立思考的能力是非常罕见的。也许这是遗传的……

    这开启了一些可能性和概率。

    “管理-治疗”国家不会容忍这种情况。实际上,在当前和未来的技术和法律下,“孤独者”可以被看到并受到“特别”关注。

    我可以很容易地看到在不久的将来……嗯……帮助和教育……那些孤独者的尝试。

    至于女人和男人的事情,这很简单,看到周围的一切很有趣。
    当然,出于显而易见的原因,明智的人不能在这样的地方真正谈论这一点。但是,它是如此基本、简单,而且实际上是硬连线的,所以观看这一切很有趣。

    对于周围的年轻人我真的很想推荐
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Men_Are_from_Mars,_Women_Are_from_Venus
    并将其与简单的常识相结合。

    自由意志,孩子们。你的生命。

  184. @steinbergfeldwitzcohen

    加伯德的照片通常被媒体篡改。
    她是一名跨性别男变女。牙弓、颈部(喉结缩小手术的痕迹)、眉骨等。

    • 哈哈: Liza
  185. Anon[279]• 免责声明 说:

    犹太男人一直是自恋、懦弱、爱发牢骚的妈妈男孩,他们不能修理家里的任何东西;很大一部分可能是同性恋。经过五年来通过控制我们的媒体和学术界进行无情的灌输,犹太人已经成功地将我们的大多数人变成了犹太人。看看所有毫无价值的千禧一代都市型男,他们的男人包绑在国际象棋上,甚至连轮胎都不会换。现在,越来越多的人选择成为家庭主妇,而他们的妻子则负责养家糊口,前提是他们一开始就不是同性恋或跨性别者。

    想象一下这个国家受到攻击,女性必须拿起武器来保护这些娘娘腔的男人。但是,嘿,至少他们没有感染“有毒的男子气概”。

    • 同意: Johnny Walker Read
  186. Liza 说:

    妇女成年后的大部分时间都在家里度过,她们怀孕或照顾小孩。

    显然,这些妇女并不总是独自在家。是的,我想有时她们是这样,但她们也花时间与其他女性一起做各种有用的事情。也一直坐着闲聊。世界上的狩猎采集地区仍然如此,至少从我看到的一段大约 40 年前由一位旅行人类学家拍摄的视频来看是这样。一个女人被困在家里带着孩子,“无行为能力”,这在很大程度上是现代文明的情况。

    请注意,我更喜欢和我的后代一起呆在家里。事情并不像他们说的那么糟糕。取决于所涉女性的性格。我想如果你有六个孩子,那可能会很有挑战性。没有完美的生活。由于我在很多事情上的观点不受欢迎,幸好我周围没有一群有“其他想法”的女性。

    • 同意: bruce county
    • 回复: @peterAUS
    , @Ilyana_Rozumova
  187. peterAUS 说:
    @Liza

    ……我更喜欢和我的后代一起呆在家里……

    想象一下。一位母亲更喜欢在家里和孩子们一起度过一天,而不是在交通、工作场所和交通中度过。
    工作场所的现状:越来越多的人在越来越艰苦的条件下工作,但工资却越来越低。

    疯。
    现代世界和生活在其中的大多数人。

    确实,探戈需要两个人。
    处于上述位置的女性过去、现在都很容易受到后来与她离婚的角色的影响。一个成功的男人寻找一个更有魅力的女人。

    我不会把所有的责任都归咎于女性和“progtards”。在“我的时代”,男人有很多可责备的地方。男人的时代已经过去很久了 能够养家糊口。聪明人,就是这样。

    当年有一件事,像我这样的人都记得。比如冷战之类的。

    一对年轻夫妇结婚了。一个男人可以在物质上养活一个小家庭。女人负责照顾家庭和孩子。
    问题:男人的地位、事业、社会权力都得到提升。这改变了一个人。
    女人留在家里。这也改变了她。比如说,无法与男人经常接触的所有女人竞争。
    比如说,这个人成为了中/高级经理。女人仍然是家庭主妇。这对夫妇失去了这种联系。
    他甩了她。怎么办?从女人的角度来看,确实如此。三十多岁的家庭主妇。
    社会保护确实在当时起到了保护这些妇女的作用。
    就像今天大多数常识一样,它变得疯狂;我只是……呵呵……作为一个男人,在这里指出一些问题。

    当然,正如这个酒吧中的大多数主题一样,我们甚至无法开始找到适当的解决方案。
    我的看法也很简单:两人跳探戈。 50/50。工作,牺牲。双方的聪明才智。爱。呵呵..浪漫和性也一样。

    无论如何。

    • 回复: @Commentator Mike
  188. Miro23 说:
    @Sunshine

    这就是这一切的归结。女人很痛苦,但不能也不会承认。她们不会承认她们的“权利”和女权主义摧毁了她们的幸福。所以它会继续下去。

    这是一个有趣的评论,女性扮演男性角色看起来像是一个失败的公式。

    将成功的事业与持家和家庭结合起来是一项艰苦的工作——有压力、复杂、缺乏时间,所以持家和家庭被推迟或永远不会发生。

    此外,职业女性抢走了男性的工作。如果多余的男性被要求成为家庭主妇和儿童看护者,那么总的来说,他们可能不会与职业女性结婚,而是在其他地方寻找更正常的关系。

    找到合适的人也很困难。职业女性显然对雄性领袖有强烈的偏爱,因为 1) 周围的女性人数不多 2) 雄性领袖可能想要远离工作的舒适的家庭生活。

    基本上,女权主义、功利主义、“权利”和工作场所平等对女性来说似乎是一场灾难。

  189. @Achmed E. Newman

    哦,讽刺的是,……你在这里,强化了本文的标题。
    像你这样的男性应该闭嘴走开,因为你强化了男性愚蠢、无知、用鸡巴思考的观念。

    • 回复: @Achmed E. Newman
  190. 在以棕色皮肤为主的美丽年轻菲律宾人中成为一名白人真是太棒了。

    如果我表现得像个酱油男孩,他们会目瞪口呆。

    最疯狂的是,家里的女人弄脏了自己,解释为什么那些小辣妹并不真正爱我,为什么我无法接受“坚强”、肥胖、丑陋、大嘴巴的女权主义者的“独立”。

    所以我放弃了,选择了一个比我小30-40岁的妻子、情妇和女朋友。 都是尤物。 一切都让我开心。

    • 回复: @Sunshine
    , @Daniel Rich
  191. Agathoklis 说:

    之前说过,但盎格鲁-凯尔特人和其他东北欧人应该关注更古老的文化,比如希腊/罗马伊人(对于普通美国人来说,也许更广为人知的是希腊人),在这些文化中,启蒙运动后的价值观对男女之间的关系没有多少影响。家庭关系应该是结构化的。例如,通常有较高水平的男子气概,鼓励女性美丽但有些不可触碰,尊重父亲作为最终决策者,明确划分角色,代际尊重和生活(祖父母扮演着非常重要的角色)当然,后启蒙运动的价值观也正在侵入这种古老的家庭安排。

    • 回复: @Sam Coulton
  192. @Observator

    先生,我确实相信增加劳动力资源有利于资本家。

  193. ricpic 说:
    @Harbinger

    在他们成长的过程中,他们的父母在哪里告诉他们女人的窗户很小而且关得很快?从十几岁到二十几岁的男性欲望对象,然后是啊!关闭。几乎所有三十岁之前的人都在隔离墙。为什么爸爸妈妈没有把这件事灌输到他们的脑海里呢?!

    • 回复: @Harbinger
  194. Harbinger 说:

    在“醒来”这个词的概念上,左派已经成功地劫持了它。 “醒来”中的“醒来”与“红色药丸/矩阵/兔子洞”的含义完全相反。今天,“醒来”一词描绘的是一个了解上述所有含义的人,而不是一个知道正在发生什么的人,例如全球主义者、犹太人、光明会、共济会等的权力结构。
    正如同性恋者劫持了“同性恋”这个词一样,黑人也劫持了“黑鬼”这个词,左派也劫持了“觉醒”。

    控制词语和改变定义就是彻底摧毁一个社会的方式。他们在这方面做得非常好。

  195. ricpic 说:
    @Sunshine

    我是一个“冷漠的独行者”,老实说,大部分时间我都很快乐。好吧,我认为怪人部分不适合我……但谁知道呢?

  196. 76239 说:
    @WorkingClass

    “然而,监管有利于竞争。”

    大公司利用监管来阻止暴发户和小公司。与小公司相比,大公司有更多的钱请律师和贿赂政客来塑造监管的性质。美国证券交易委员会将追查玛莎·斯图尔特,而不是高盛。这就是所谓的监管捕获

    自由社会中的竞争更加激烈。监管是针对亲信和寡头的。

  197. Anon[159]• 免责声明 说:

    尽管听起来很笼统,但我发现大多数女律师都患有精神疾病。

    我几乎一直与 100% 女性一起工作。

    根据我的重要经验,任何职业女性的随机样本都将包含以下内容:

    40% 的人患有合法的精神疾病,使他们经常神经质、对任何事情都怀有报复心理,并且缺乏自尊(导致了前两者)。这些女性往往会形成群体,对她们所瞄准的任何人都采取被动、攻击性的破坏方式,通常是出于看似任意的原因(一个人不喜欢你的原因是,你在工作场所表现比她们更好,等等)。

    10% 酷。意味着非神经质的精神状态或隐藏的、轻微的精神疾病加上和蔼可亲的性格。这些女性倾向于完全避开第一组。他们常常是孤独的人或接近孤独的人。有些出奇地好看,如果你最终和他们一起出去的话,这是一个很好的选择。

    10% 跨越前两者。自尊心稍低,因此他们会与“受欢迎的”(在他们自己和他们可怜的男朋友之间)精神病患者成为伙伴,然后移民离开,但在其他方面却足够酷。

    40% 是壁花型或外向的书呆子型。你几乎不会注意到壁花,而其他的则需要一些技巧才能与他们交朋友(但这是值得的)。我不会说他们作为一个群体很酷,因为他们中的很多人都不是超级友好,但至少他们表面上并不可怕。有些人是好人,虽然有些古怪,但也很有趣。一些比较安静的人可以从他们的外壳中拿出来,但我今天不建议这样做,因为他们很难信任。许多人会徘徊在心理群体的边缘,其他人会独来独往或结识其他外群体的朋友。

    前 40% 的人将管理工作场所,而没有一位拥有真正权威的熟练母鸡,这会让其他人都不受欢迎。如果你落入他们的瞄准线并且无法逃脱,请做好迎接最终影响的准备。避免这种情况的一种方法是忽视她们(一定要微笑并打个招呼,然后就这样了)并与其他 60% 的女性建立社会资本。这些懦夫本能地给拥有其他社会资本的人留出空间,但会攻击社会弱势群体。

  198. HEREDOT 说:
    @Harbinger

    精彩的评论,壮观的社会学观察。

  199. Harbinger 说:
    @ricpic

    “在他们成长的过程中,他们的父母在哪里告诉他们女人的窗户很小而且关得很快?从十几岁到二十几岁的男性欲望对象,然后是啊!关闭。几乎所有三十岁之前的人都在隔离墙。为什么爸爸妈妈没有把这件事灌输给他们?!”

    嗯,我认为首先我们必须考虑哪一代人。当然,战后的父母无疑正是在告诉他们的女儿这一点,警告她们她们的性市场价值随着她们30多岁而迅速下降。然而,请记住,正是那些上大学的18岁年轻人,被当时的女权主义者洗脑,开始了这一切。所以从技术上讲,从 18 年代 60 岁的人出生的一代,“x”一代(我这一代)是那些被告知没有时间窗口,可以做任何自己想做的事情的女性。
    如您所知,灌输是一种非常强大的工具。我这一代人,都是四十多岁的女性,她们眼睁睁地看着生活已经过去,孤独、无子、单身,大多数男人都看不到她们。这就是为什么她们出门都打扮成40岁的样子,亮着胸,穿着裙子,丁字裤都看得见。她们把性放在盘子里,向任何想要拥有她们的男性提供性服务,希望建立关系,但她们带到餐桌上的唯一东西是她们的阴道,当然还有不断抱怨的头痛,一卡车的行李,壁橱里的骷髅和痛苦。

    自 12 岁起,我已经单身 36 年了。6 年前,我在那段时间有过一次性经历,那是一个错误。我看不出今天的女性有什么吸引力,一点也没有。如果他们二十几岁(是的,我被他们攻击了),他们的脑子就完全死了,完全被灌输了左翼,支持多元文化主义,多元种族主义,LGBTQ……。大规模移民等等。如果她们三十多岁,她们肯定是单身母亲,并且与二十多岁的人几乎有相同的信仰。如果他们30多岁,他们可能已经是祖母了。约会游戏现在对我来说已经关闭了。这是可悲的。我想要的只是一个妻子、孩子以及作为慈父照顾他们。这永远不会发生,因为我一点也不信任女性。我见过太多的朋友被拖上法庭,他们的生活被前妻以及他们的家人毁掉了。也有一些人自杀了。可怕。绝对可怕。

    但我离题了……女权主义向女性兜售了她们可以做任何事情的谎言。他们不能。如果女性接管社会,社会就会崩溃。它正在崩溃。女性不适合领导。他们没有能力这样做。她们被教导要追求事业,与男性竞争,正因为如此,我们看到天生憎恨男性的女同性恋者在社会中变得突出,在以前对所有同性恋者关闭的机构中担任职务。由于男人憎恨女同性恋者及其拥有的权力,社会变得更加专制。对于同性恋者来说很棒,对于异性恋者来说则是噩梦。

    你将无法扭转对女性的灌输。在我写这篇文章时,一位朋友的前任(40 岁)在一次聚会上被强奸。她这么说。然而,这个故事描绘了一幅相反的画面。它将上法庭,我相信她哭诉强奸是因为她知道这会给她现在的前任带来问题,她正在接吻拥抱,而且据我所知还进行了口交。值得庆幸的是,这名男子并未受到“同伙”的攻击。我有几个朋友因强奸指控而被拖上法庭,但在女性承认撒谎后,案件最终被驳回。现在这种情况已经很常见了。美国女性谈论日益增长的“强奸”文化,而她们真正想说的是“越来越多的女性同意发生性行为,但在事件发生后改变了主意”。

    女人已经失去了阴谋。如今,大多数女性除了性之外什么也不给男性。男性不仅害怕在离婚法庭上失去一切,失去与孩子(如果有的话)接触的机会,而且还害怕被指控虚假强奸、工作场所性侵犯/骚扰,从而毁掉他们的职业生涯并感染超级性传播疾病。正如计划所言,男女之间的差距确实正在扩大,而这之所以发生,只是因为犹太人赋予了女性在社会中凌驾于男性之上的权力和影响力。社会已经崩溃了。我无法想象今天和一个女人住在一起。我听到的都是来自朋友和他们的关系的恐怖故事,不断的争吵、肢体冲突、逮捕、离婚、限制孩子……这样的例子不胜枚举。
    我并不孤单有这样的想法。 正如所言,MGTOW 理念正在不断发展,越来越多的人正在离开种植园。 我们肯定会看到女同性恋人口的增加。

    • 同意: jim jones, Kiel
    • 回复: @Backwoods Bob
  200. @Liza

    妇女需要四到五年的时间来照顾她的两个孩子。与此同时,她可以学习和教育自己感兴趣的学科。五年后,她可以自由地做任何她想做的事情。

    • 回复: @Sam Coulton
  201. bruce county 说:
    @Sam Coulton

    哇他妈的哇……我刚刚读过吗???

    • 回复: @Anatman
  202. Sam Coulton [又名“ SSSM Coulton”] 说:
    @Ilyana_Rozumova

    呃,不。生两个孩子是根本不可接受的,而且女性永远不能自由地做她们想做的任何事情。

  203. Sam Coulton [又名“ SSSM Coulton”] 说:
    @Agathoklis

    为什么?盎格鲁凯尔特人和西北欧人的生育率是发达国家白人或亚洲人中最高的。濒临灭绝的是南欧人,尤其是东南欧人。

    • 回复: @Agathoklis
  204. 中国和俄罗斯并不像西方那样疯狂。预计他们很快就会主宰世界。我们会知道为什么。

  205. Sunshine 说:
    @Backwoods Bob

    你知道,他们也知道,他们不爱你。 这纯粹是交易性的,你用你的钱来换取他们的陪伴。 我不怪你,西方女人很糟糕,但为什么要假装不然呢?

    • 回复: @Sam Coulton
  206. renfro 说:

    如今,欧盟委员会明确的目标是女性管理人员比例至少达到 40%,而这一目标只有通过在晋升过程中系统性地歧视男性才能实现。欧盟希望对欧洲上市公司实行类似的法定配额,即所有公司董事会中女性比例达到 40%。

    疯狂的。我猜想,如果在美国采用平权行动,40% 的女性中的一半将必须是黑人女性。

    根据性别、肤色、种族、少数族裔身份来雇用或任命人员是多么疯狂的事情……这肯定会造成一团他妈的无能的混乱,就好像我们打交道的大多数公司还没有无能一样。

    • 回复: @bruce county
  207. @Harbinger

    显然,你从来没有离开过农场。

    在过去的几十年里,我进行了很多国外旅行和生活。

    作为摇滚明星永远不会变老。 我今年 61 岁。我的妻子 31 岁,体重 97 磅,很漂亮。 她每天都为了我和孩子们而精疲力竭。

    我最后一个情妇是19岁。妻子采访他们,她是他们的老板。 那个人无法承受对妻子的嫉妒,我们以她的无礼为由解雇了她。

    但总的来说,这个模型的效果非常好。 在亚洲,主妇/小妻的历史非常悠久,或者英国人更喜欢称之为……妻子/情妇模式。

    他们所提供的是阿谀奉承、女佣、厨师、卧室老虎,以及永远照顾你的人。 为她的家人分配各种安全和支持角色。

    成为国王真是太好了。

    • 回复: @Harbinger
    , @Anon
    , @Corvinus
  208. Anon[294]• 免责声明 说:
    @AaronB

    但那些微妙、适应性强、聪明的另类右翼人士在哪里呢? 到目前为止,为什么这样的人这么少? 他们为什么这么蠢?

    根据定义,如果它们像你所描述的那样微妙而有效,那么它们就不会受到左派免疫系统的影响,因此在很大程度上不会被数百万高估自己聪明的犹太自恋者察觉。

  209. bruce county 说:
    @renfro

    观看一支女性团队建造和维修基础设施会很有趣。道路、桥梁、通讯塔、铁路、除垢(清除道路和轨道上岩壁上的巨石)。隧道和地下下部结构。电力工人!!.塔吊女操作员在哪里?

    我仍在等待一位女性赢得印地 500 大赛。

    我爱女人..我不喜欢今天的“女人”。诡辩太深了。美德信号就在那里。

    • 回复: @Skeptikal
  210. Skeptikal 说:
    @Svevlad

    “苏联现在完全是女性”是什么意思?

    我的印象是,从远处看,但偶尔观看《周日晚间》和其他带有字幕的新闻节目,俄罗斯女性更强大,俄罗斯男性更强大。

  211. @Harbinger

    当今西方和“老鼠乌托邦”实验的共同关键因素是缺乏稀缺性。所有基本需求均得到满足。没有人为食物或温暖的被褥而奋斗——只是缺乏房地产。

    在一种人们不会遭遇痛苦和死亡的文化中,没有任何阻力可以限制他们的愚蠢和疯狂。如今,安逸、溺爱的女性在功能上受到了欺骗。他们不知道在哪里、为什么、如何或谁提供他们的冷热清洁自来水、暖气和空调、铺好的街道、照亮他们的房屋和街道的电力。更重要的是,他们不在乎。他们只是理所当然地认为无论他们的行为如何,它都会永远存在。

    遗忘者走上了毁灭之路。

    • 同意: bruce county
  212. @peterAUS

    啊,现代人担心的事情。我想说,在历史的大部分时间里,照顾家庭和孩子、下地干活和做其他卑微的工作都是由女性承担的。如果男人在身边,他会帮忙,但他的工作主要只是让女人怀孕,等待国王的战争号召,可能永远不会回到他的家和家人身边,如果在战斗中幸存下来,甚至可能与其他人安定下来远方被征服土地上的女人。人们变得如此软弱和被宠坏,而女人的要求却太高了。男人离开女人——我想说这可能是过去经常发生的事情。这不取决于任何人,这些人只是被带走了,大多数人对此都很热情。

    • 回复: @peterAUS
  213. Sam Coulton [又名“ SSSM Coulton”] 说:
    @Sunshine

    但离婚率却另有说法。这不是交易性的。

  214. Skeptikal 说:
    @Twodees Partain

    “如果孩子的学术智力处于边缘状态,而且有点漫无目的,他们的父母需要引导他们远离大学,转向贸易、土木、电力、水利、建筑等行业。他们将不得不再次学习如何努力工作。 ”

    我同意这一点,除了“边缘学术”。 。 。我认为漫无目的的部分可以删除。这些行业需要大量的情报和培训。在我的房子完全重新布线后,我对电工大师的专业知识怀有最大的敬意。请给我一位聪明、训练有素、经验丰富的电工,而不是一位年轻、愚蠢、训练有素的电工。我不知道有任何女电工。我不知道为什么会这样,但这可能与所需的某种类型的团队合作以及团队的层次结构有关。说到水管工,我再次不知道有任何女水管工。这很奇怪,因为大多数水管工都是单独工作,而且管道安装通常不需要很大的力量。此外,还有很多女性艺术家用她们的材料进行繁重的工作,例如雕塑家或大型画布画家。

    过去,男性的社会理想是他们是优秀的运动员,善于应对紧急情况,并且聪明且受过良好教育。比喻“客厅里有贵妇,卧室里有妓女”,就是“君子待人接物,不让人往自己脸上踢沙子”。

    尽管近年来性别发生了扭曲,但我们对“男性气质”和“女性气质”的实际看法仍然很狭隘。例如,将“养育”行为归咎于女性是愚蠢的。许多“坚强”的男人都是有教养且温柔的。许多女性明显具有竞争性并且缺乏同情心。此外,这些狭窄的特征分布似乎没有为各种品质(优势和劣势)的个体组合留下太多空间,而这些品质共同构成了人格。

    我自己的经验是,男性更擅长通过体育活动/工作/运动等来建立联系。女性更有可能通过交流做母亲的经历来建立联系。如果他们聪明且好奇,他们会发现母性为他们提供了深入思考的充足原材料。对于男性和体育运动来说,不太确定同样的情况。

    很难找到任何性别的人进行真正有趣的讨论。他们都只是全天候(24/7)“阅读”他们的智能手机。这是最大的问题!

    • 回复: @SafeNow
    , @Daniel Rich
  215. Harbinger 说:
    @Backwoods Bob

    您声明:

    “看来你从来没有离开过农场。”

    你显然错过了我说的那部分:

    “自 12 岁起,我已经单身 36 年了。6 年前,我在那段时间有过一次性经历,那是一个错误。”

    然后声明:

    “我的妻子…。”

    你显然无法理解清醒的人们内心的“农场/种植园”的概念。供您参考,居住在农场/种植园的是已婚人士。

    “作为摇滚明星永远不会变老。我今年61岁,我的妻子31岁,体重97磅,很漂亮……我上一个情妇19岁。妻子采访他们,她是他们的老板。

    所以,如今在西方,“开放式关系”风靡一时。显然,你和你的妻子不仅不尊重自己,而且也不尊重对方。一想到要与某人发生关系,而某人又与另一个人发生性关系,我的胃就明显不舒服。

    “成为国王真是太好了。”

    我真的不会称你为国王。
    我们超越了西方的一夫多妻制。你决定离开西方,沉浸在异国文化中,并与尽可能多的年轻女性发生性关系。你逃跑了,这是我永远不会做的事。我弟弟逃跑了,现在的处境和你差不多。我不同意。
    这是我永远不会做的事情,仅仅因为我不像你那样将女性视为自慰的辅助工具,并且与东方女性建立关系并不能解决欧洲人口迅速下降的问题。

    • 同意: Sunshine
  216. Skeptikal 说:
    @bruce county

    女人与男人竞争、男人与女人竞争的景象是可悲的。

    有些女性身体强壮,以能够从事体力劳动为荣。
    如果一个人愿意分享专业知识,他们会很高兴。
    但许多男性认为女性对此类专业知识不感兴趣。
    或者,他们不想分享。

  217. AaronB:“今天,像 Vox Day 和布鲁斯·查尔顿这样的思想家只是从基督教中得到他们想要的任何东西。”

    那些可以被赋予任何意义的东西实际上毫无意义。这完美地说明了宗教毫无意义的本质。

    AaronB:“现代趋势也是如此——服从并顺应它们,然后你将能够影响当前趋势——最终,也许,完全重新命名它。”

    伴随着灭绝,希望在它结束之后“稍后”影响它?无论如何,这听起来并不是一个好计划。

    杜罗彻假装关心“大母亲”,但故意忽视了,如果没有科学节育和堕胎的技术“进步”及其在现代世界的广泛普及,女权主义就不可能实现。消除这种可用性,它带来的问题就会消失。这么多应该是显而易见的。

    那为什么不删除它呢?你会被告知这是不可能的,尤其是因为白人本身不希望它被删除。她们想要享受它带来的好处,但相当一部分人不想要其后果,即把妇女从生育和家庭中解放出来;或者换句话说,女性赋权。在这里,我们再次看到了不付出任何代价就享受技术“进步”带来的好处的幼稚愿望。在这里我们再次看到了技术的双重性;每次“进步”如何产生新的问题和副作用,在这种情况下和许多其他情况下,这些都是主要影响的一部分,以至于无法与主要影响分开。你知道,事实证明,让女性掌控自己的生育能力就解放了她们!真是太他妈的惊喜了!天哪,我们肯定没有看到那个人来!

    但实际上,我可能不应该开玩笑,因为当时引入这种“进步”的人们实际上并没有预见到它的到来。他们没有预见到这种技术本身会带来家庭的毁灭、父权制的衰落以及劳动力的彻底重新排序。他们没有预见到自由性实验的文化会发展并践踏所有现有的社会习俗。如果他们有的话,他们一定会非常疯狂地接受这样的“进步”。

    由于这些问题是由技术造成的,因此我们可以预期,随着每一次新的“进步”,我们的情况都会逐渐恶化。只要技术体系存在,这类生存危机就会持续下去,这是合理的想法。认识到这一点,我们就有了选择。要么反对这个体系并采取行动推翻它,要么接受灭绝。

    • 回复: @AaronB
  218. S 说:

    女性,尤其是左翼女性,在政治上更加不宽容:一项调查发现,30% 的民主党女性因政治原因在网上屏蔽、取消好友或停止关注某人,而共和党男性中这一比例仅为 8%。

    读到这里,我不禁想起了奥威尔。 【你的文章标题完全合适。】

    “始终是党中最顽强的信徒,妇女的口号,最重要的是年轻人,口号的吞噬者,业余间谍和不合常规的鼻子。”

    再次,当奥威尔的作品应用于当今几乎完全拒绝承认两种性别之间的差异时,永远有先见之明的奥威尔是正确的。

    “温斯顿想,面对一个比你更聪明的疯子,他公平地听取了你的论点,然后又坚持他的疯狂,你能做什么呢?”

  219. 无论从任何“定义”来看,能够可靠地操作商用飞机的“男性”或“女性”都越来越少。

  220. peterAUS 说:
    @Commentator Mike

    嗯……确实如此。

    但是,对于这个主题,我将依靠自己的经验。

    一个好人,在“我的时代” 能够养家糊口。是的,“女人要照顾家庭和孩子”,因为像我这样的人(军人……)大多数时候都不在家。呵呵……不过,显然我还是能回家。很多人都喜欢我(回来)。有时有些人没有。交易风险。
    实际上,类似的情况适用于很多人,而不仅仅是服役人员。我的小学/中学中大多数没有走我的道路的人(平民……)都有非常相似的设置。

    我只拿我的“零花钱”,而我的大部分工资将由我的妻子管理。总是。还有……呵呵……津贴是大家一起决定的。一个人在单位里不需要太多。聪明人,就是这样。

    当我离开服务并切换到“civvy street”时,我保留了相同的设置。总是。
    即使是现在,正如我们所说。

    分工。人类最根本的东西。
    女人在某些事情上更胜一筹。我相信这是家、(小)孩子和金钱。只有我。
    人比很多人都更好。
    团队合作。永恒 在性别方面。嗯,那是,什么,五万年。显然不再是了。

    我开车去购物然后回来。她买东西。我把东西从车上搬进屋里。她做饭。我洗车。割草。等等……等等……

    我们的运作方式与我们见面时完全相同。至今已有 30 多年历史,经历了一些相当具有挑战性的时期。一次也不需要任何人的任何……任何……建议。
    那里没有秘密。女人做她的事;男人做他的。一起。

    我们经常对文章中的主题进行评论。作为……”这些人怎么了?为什么他们要把这么简单的事情复杂化呢?”

    很久以前,我在这里写过关于这一点的文章:
    我们去徒步旅行。遇到了一群年轻人。他们很有礼貌地邀请我们加入;我们确实告诉他们这会影响他们的速度……无论如何。赛道上有很多棘手的部分。对于每一个问题,我都会像往常一样停下来帮助我的妻子进行谈判。
    现在……那群人中有一个单身女孩(漂亮的金发女郎)和两个英俊的年轻单身男性。女孩正在挣扎。这两个男人一次也没有试图帮助她。不止一次。
    实际上,有一次,是我在她摔倒在泥里后帮助她站起来。
    疯狂的。

    说实话,已经放弃了。对每个人……自由意志等等。

    • 回复: @Commentator Mike
    , @Miro23
  221. @Andrei Martyanov

    在这种不稳定的混合物中添加[通常不那么]微妙的东西 社会军事化全副武装的褐衫军在街道、小巷中奔跑,甚至破门而入,这是电视连续剧 [Talmud Vision – TM geokat] 中的常见场景,而且这个社会的发展方向非常明显;道德和经济的深渊。

    [链接是财团新闻]

    • 回复: @Andrei Martyanov
  222. Shaman911 说:

    如果你看看叛乱、丑闻、政治动乱、帝国的毁灭,就会发现“所讲述的就是历史”。他们中的大多数人都以某种方式参与了(女人)。每种文化的神话故事和宗教意识形态中的女性都围绕着相同的格式演变。
    埃文吃了苹果,世界变得一团糟,邪恶占据了至高无上的地位。在这种情况下,女性是地狱和诅咒的承受者。生命体进入虚幻冷漠存在的幽冥之地的繁殖平台。
    有没有注意到你的苹果笔记本电脑!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    苹果被咬了一口!这是一个信息、象征和对你将继续受奴役的预测。
    调查、图表、报告都只是幻觉。
    从洞穴到会议室,这个游戏一直以这样或那样的方式进行着。
    以太坊方面参与此事的每个人都是共济会成员。 (奥尔多·阿卜·朝)

  223. Agathoklis 说:
    @Sam Coulton

    垃圾。这些盎格鲁和西北欧国家的高生育率来自于移民群体。

    • 回复: @Sam Coulton
  224. AaronB 说:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    伴随着灭绝,希望在它结束之后“稍后”影响它?无论如何,这听起来并不是一个好计划。

    为什么不?正如基督徒执行耶稣的命令,转过另一边脸,不顾明天,试图征服眼前的一切,发展节俭和勤奋的新教美德,所以你可以通过促进高出生率和白人社区。

    这就是这个世界的运作方式。官方叙述必须得到尊重,但不一定遵循。

  225. Anon[279]• 免责声明 说:
    @Harbinger

    可悲的现实是,今天的人们正在走自己的路。

    他们是变成同性恋还是只是与机器人发生性关系?

  226. Anon[279]• 免责声明 说:
    @Backwoods Bob

    在东南亚经营鸦片馆和后宫的堕落者。 我们懂了。

    在东南亚看到太多西方堕落男性干这种事了。 有些人甚至将它们带回美国并继续这种生活方式。 可悲又可悲。

  227. @Backwoods Bob

    所以我放弃了,选择了一个比我小30-40岁的妻子、情妇和女朋友。 都是尤物。 一切都让我开心。

    此消息由赞助 伟哥.

    :o]

    我曾经在[某处]读到,如果/当一个男人喜欢亚洲女人[像我一样],那是因为我实际上是一个未出柜的恋童癖……

    我把这个消息转达给我的[日本]妻子,她只是笑得前仰后合。

    及时行乐,我的朋友。

  228. SafeNow 说:
    @Skeptikal

    “很难找到任何性别的人与……智能手机进行真正有趣的讨论……这是最大的问题”

    我完全同意。嗯,这个网站总是有的!
    我的思绪转向康拉德的短篇小说《故事》。妻子对丈夫说:“给我讲个故事吧。” (他确实这么做了,很长。她感兴趣地听着)想象一下。真是个妻子啊。

  229. @Skeptikal

    过去,男性的社会理想是他们是优秀的运动员,善于应对紧急情况,并且聪明且受过良好教育。比喻“客厅里有贵妇,卧室里有妓女”,就是“君子待人接物,不让人往自己脸上踢沙子”。

    谁提出了“我们都是赢家”的概念?

    金牌升至第一。不是 1、2 或 3。

    因此,我的猜测是,它是由一群酸楚的失败者吐出来的。

    谁缺乏站立得高、强壮的身体能力?

    这就是为什么这么多电影严重依赖CG,以便“我们”能够超越生活并克服“我们”的缺点吗?

  230. Alex 说:

    我在 IT 领域的经验表明,许多有利于少数群体的举措最终都只是表面现象。联邦政府要求,对于使用联邦资金支付的任何 IT 项目,接受者(通常是州或城市)将合同金额的 20% 用于少数族裔。

    因此,事情的运作方式是,州或市政府使用少数族裔(通常是印度人)拥有的人才中介机构,然后这些机构在他们的保护伞下雇用像我这样的人来处理这些合同。

    最后,我得到了专门用于少数派资助的资金,每个人都很高兴。我确信其他行业的情况也类似。

    就像联邦政府所做的其他事情一样,这一切都是雾里看花……。

  231. @AaronB

    像往常一样,你说的话纯粹是白痴。不要谈论基督教。成为基督徒就是做与你所说的恰恰相反的事,你是犹太人。 “存在于世界中,但不属于世界”。

    对抗和抵抗从来没有成功过吗? 除了二十世纪的每一次革命。

    为了犹太人、犹太代理人和合作伙伴的利益,人们已经开始自我审查。这不会持续太久。

    另类右翼是不可避免的。

    • 同意: Change that Matters, Anatman
  232. @AaronB

    你说的是反转——塔木德和撒旦的基本原则。我们已经生活在一个颠倒的社会,言语的含义相反。

    基督教是关于传教的。为什么你希望灵魂不归正并被判入地狱?

    正如希莱尔·贝洛克斯的《犹太人》中所概述的那样,基督徒根本没有做好对抗披着羊皮的狼的准备。犹太金融与欧洲财产和贵族联姻,创建了美联储体系,获得了对一切的垄断,因此就有了今天的撒旦恋童癖犹太精英。

    早期基督徒所犯的错误是传教不够,也不够残酷——强加了他们现在面临的来自 Globohomo 的同样的审查制度。基督徒太愿意假装低劣的宗教和完全劣等的民族在普世主义和慈善的基础上是平等的。这个错误是致命的,而且很可能不会再犯。

    Globohomo 已经证明言论自由是一个骗局。所以现在,当基督徒重新掌权时,将会有新的光荣的亵渎法。如果我不能说同性恋是恋童癖,如果这些同性恋徒然冒用上帝的名义,他们就会失去一切——就像我会失去一切,就像伊斯雷尔·福劳(Israel Folau)那样,因为他正确地讲述了圣经关于同性恋者及其造成的破坏的说法关于社会。左派播下了风,他们最终将收获旋风。

    你对基督教的看法绝对是弱智。

    你将看到的是一群好战的白人少数派,他们的行为与犹太人一模一样——只不过他们的迫害是真实的,而不是虚假的。

    • 同意: Change that Matters, Anatman
    • 回复: @Corvinus
  233. Sam Coulton [又名“ SSSM Coulton”] 说:
    @Agathoklis

    不,我担心你就是个垃圾。爱尔兰、斯堪的纳维亚半岛和冰岛的西北欧人的生育率确实较高。例如,尽管瑞典移民的生育率远高于瑞典族人,但瑞典族人的平均生育率(1.6)仍然高于东南欧人(0.9-1.3)。

    欧洲本土生育率最高的是冰岛和丹麦,分别为 1.8 和 1.7。
    相比之下,希腊的生育率为 1。

    美国有全国规模的人口,如摩门教和阿米什/门诺教,每个妇女的生育率超过 3 个孩子。他们主要是西日耳曼人和英国人的后裔。

    • 回复: @Agathoklis
    , @Miro23
  234. @AaronB

    所以这就是亚伦说你应该做的,进行微妙的修改。

    – 吃虫子来应对“气候变化”
    – 吃人类是为了“气候变化”
    – 允许同性恋迅速发展,不可避免地、不可逆转地发展为恋童癖。
    – 篡改历史
    – 证伪科学
    – 伪造性别
    – 艺术的伪造
    – 社会科学报告的伪造或审查,即犯罪率
    – 摧毁剩余的学科。
    – 允许欧洲所有的教堂被玷污并变成清真寺
    – 允许摧毁和拆除所有可能被犹太人指责为“白人”的徽章或文物(例如雕像)
    – 允许通过虚假程序进行大规模盗窃来持续破坏经济
    – 允许儿童教育继续受到破坏 – 最新的 NAEP 成绩单显示,美国只有三分之一的儿童能够熟练阅读。诺格人和墨西哥人对教学的侵犯以及犹太人对教学法的歪曲和颠覆正在创造一个真正的早期亚人类奴隶群体。
    – 如果您对此发表任何言论,请允许您的孩子变性、生殖器被毁坏并被逮捕。
    – 允许摧毁所有西方自由
    – 允许你的国家伊斯兰化。

    简而言之,种族、宗教、民族和家庭的彻底毁灭。

    伙计们,只要巧妙地配合这个议程即可。

    这不会发生,亚伦。整个人口将被从西方驱逐出去。

  235. Corvinus 说:

    “事实是,至少在过去两个世纪里,西方文明一直在稳步女性化。男性的衰落已成为主流媒体边缘的话题。男性的衰落同时体现在生物、经济、社会和道德方面。”

    那就是假新闻。

  236. Corvinus 说:
    @Flint Clint

    “所以现在,当基督徒重新掌权时,将会有新的光荣的亵渎法。”

    那么你到底要如何实现这一点呢?

    “基督徒太愿意假装劣等宗教和完全劣等民族在普世主义和慈善的基础上是平等的。这个错误是致命的,很可能不会再犯。”

    根据谁/谁?

    • 回复: @Flint Clint
    , @Flint Clint
  237. Corvinus 说:
    @Backwoods Bob

    “作为摇滚明星永远不会变老。我今年 61 岁。我的妻子 31 岁,体重 97 磅,很漂亮。她每天都为了我和孩子们而精疲力竭。”

    任何人都可以在互联网上说任何话。您对“生活方式”的描述很可能不准确。

  238. @Corvinus

    确实,这听起来像是废话。

    我只是做一些假设。他们可能是错的。只要白人能够避免被犹太人称为种族主义者,他们所承受的痛苦很可能是无限的。我假设您是婴儿潮一代。这对你来说可能听起来很疯狂。

    https://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/creating-the-white-tribe/

    阅读评论。年轻的白人明白。

    对白人的迫害永远不会停止——而且最终会打破不和谐。

    当生活水平继续下降、公民素质继续退化(因为只有白人才有能力实现普世主义)时,心态就会发生变化。

    我们现在正在进入一个相当公开的伪善和迫害的阶段。

    世界历史上最大规模的人民运动将伴随着冲突。这是绝对不可避免的。

    唯一的问题是它将采取什么形式以及它将如何普及。

    “就目前而言,说难民以及那些对他们家乡的困境负有责任的人正在积极向西方发动战争,这有些过分了。他们缺乏战争所带来的有效、大规模暴力所需的领导和组织。然而,必须认识到,他们当中不少人并不反对使用暴力来实现其目标。毕竟,他们不顾这些国家人民的意愿入侵了许多国家,而且他们的存在引发抵抗的可能性并不比过去的武装入侵少。正如克劳塞维茨所教导的那样,由于战争具有升级的内在趋势,随着时间的推移,抵抗运动预计会演变成全面的武装冲突。尤其是,如果移民继续涌入,并且所有为融合所做的勇敢努力都被证明是徒劳的话,这似乎是有可能的。
    – 马丁·范·克里维尔德,《战争与移民》,《战争将会发生》 X”

    整个西半球将爆发战争。所有这些弱者都会变得强大,因为他们别无选择。

    保守的基佬们将不得不经历惨痛的教训。这从来就不是一场思想之战。这是对西方生活方式的公开战争,最终以消灭和奴役他们而告终。

    看到 Cuckservatives 继续进行最白痴的假象真是太了不起了。

    https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-20/germans-are-leaving-germany-droves

    入侵者不想同化或融合,也不想做任何他们想做的事情。这就是与他们的表兄弟结婚并摧毁他们接触到的一切。

    对于来自亚洲、次大陆和以色列的高智商征服者来说,他们只是想利用西方并将其吸干,并在其内部形成自成一体的次国家,同时轻蔑地、纯粹名义上的遵守符合西方规范。

    西方已经被吸干了。美国的债务是灾难性的,并且依赖于美元储备地位,而在德国,他们必须向银行付费才能持有资金。我们已经被外国在高端使用虚假计划、在低端获取福利所榨干——这就是经济的幻影。当婴儿潮一代不再有垃圾时,我希望你能和自己的人生活在一起。

    无论如何,我们会看到的。

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  239. AO 说:

    通奸是正当的,公民。

    至少,戴着粉色钩针小猫帽子的鱼语者是这么说的。

    那么,梅加利亚的女儿们怎么样,嗯?

  240. Agathoklis 说:
    @Sam Coulton

    希腊的生育率目前约为1.3,并且这个问题已经存在一段时间了。然而,你提到的例子很难代表盎格鲁凯尔特文化,即美国和高税收/高福利斯堪的纳维亚国家的一些孤立的宗教群体。 1960 世纪 XNUMX 年代中期,普通的盎格鲁-凯尔特人因认真对待现代性而泄露了一切。女性变得完全独立,家庭破裂,父亲不受尊重,儿子和女儿分别变得女性化和男性化,家庭和祖先的历史受到嘲笑。如今,希腊人的进步很大,但离婚率、非婚生子女率、对同性婚姻的支持率、种族恐惧症、对全球化的支持率仍然是西方世界最低的;然而,盎格鲁-凯尔特人和其他西北欧人较早地采用了后启蒙运动价值观,现在却收获了可悲的回报。

    • 回复: @Sam Coulton
  241. @Corvinus

    “战争和移民一直密切相关。这种关系早在公元前 1300 年就有记录,当时我们获悉以色列人跟随摩西离开埃及,开始了最终带领他们到达迦南应许之地的事业。您无疑还记得,他们很快就征服了它。从那时起,超过 3,315 年的时间里,战争与大规模人口从一地迁移到另一地之间的联系从未中断……。

    有时,战争和移民本质上是相同的,例如基督诞生后最初几个世纪的民族大迁徙、公元632年后阿拉伯的扩张、马扎尔人对欧洲的入侵、蒙古人对中国的入侵以及蒙古人的迁徙。许多非洲部落从非洲大陆的一个地方迁移到另一个地方。在其他时候,这两种现象之间的关系更为复杂,例如种族清洗使战争变得不必要或在战争结束后发生,大规模避免征兵,或者士兵将妾和战争新娘带回家。所有这些不同的形式经常混合在一起,都定期出现在人类历史的编年史中,并且毫无疑问在未来将继续如此。唯一改变的是它们在任何特定时间点的相对重要性。”

    “主张民族”的拥护者有很多问题需要回答。他们充当了知识分子的滩头阵地,使这场大规模入侵得以毫无抵抗地进行。很明显,既然“德国人”或“英国人”也是一个命题的谎言已经广泛传播给大众,那么“美国”民族本质上是命题的说法总是完全错误的。

    但不要绝望。对于防守者来说,早期的情况总是看起来很严峻。毫不夸张地说,两大洲的欧洲人还没有开始战斗

    没有主张国家,婴儿潮一代。

    不存在“多元文化主义”。

    让我们看看会发生什么。让我们看看人类历史的整个进程是否比婴儿潮一代关于命题国家、虚假熔炉、虚假多元文化主义和虚假一切的迟钝观念更重要。

    欧洲人将继续进行白人逃亡一段时间,直到他们意识到无处可逃。然后他们就会打架。

    白人女性将成为催化剂。他们将会发现,向入侵的部落张开双腿也只能到此为止。他们正在接受白人待遇——他们将了解 2030 年左右女权主义者会发生什么——巧合的是,这与美国离解体还有多长时间有关。

  242. 作者为何引用 Daily Stormer?这不是被广泛认为是假的受控反对派吗?

  243. Sam Coulton [又名“ SSSM Coulton”] 说:
    @Agathoklis

    英格兰、爱尔兰和苏格兰各地的生育率高于希腊各地。

    瑞典的生育率最高的是中上层阶级女性,而不是本地福利领取者(Ellingsæter,2009)。美国的摩门教人口有14万,超过了斯堪的纳维亚国家的人口。

    南欧没有什么可以给世界提供的。

    • 回复: @Agathoklis
  244. Jayne Says 说:

    厌恶女性的驾驶。事实是,缺乏安全感、无用的动物讨厌女性,不承认女性的政治事业,这是世界上最大、最合法的,因为我们被一群动物男性剥夺了人性。男性甚至没有从父权制中受益。你真是太愚蠢了,竟然继续强制执行这一点。你现在不拥有、也永远不会拥有女人。将死。生气。

    Unz,请停止发布这样的 miosgynist SHIT。

  245. @peterAUS

    听起来你那里的设置很好。大约二十年前,一位澳大利亚人告诉我,大多数希拉计划在三十岁时离婚三次,这样她们就可以为自己的生活做好准备,带着丈夫去清洁工。他说他们不值得打扰。也许他有点夸张,以证明他对亚洲女性的偏爱是合理的。

    • 回复: @peterAUS
  246. Miro23 说:
    @Sam Coulton

    例如,尽管瑞典移民的生育率远高于瑞典族人,但瑞典族人的平均生育率(1.6)仍然高于东南欧人(0.9-1.3)。

    东南欧人的低生育率是一个谜。从表面上看,他们应该有很多孩子,因为他们有牢固的家庭纽带,并且享受家庭的团聚。

    我能找到的唯一解释(过去 35 年在西班牙生活)是,一半更有能力、更聪明的年轻女性 100% 决定她们需要职业,并且正在成为“集体”银行家、律师、建筑师、税务官员、登记员、公证员、行政人员、政治家等——实际上是中产阶级和非手工的一切。

    现在的结果是,办公室里挤满了 30 岁末到 40 岁出头的职业女性,她们往往单身,而且无法找到适合自己职业的男性。与瑞典人不同,西班牙男性相当大男子主义,不适合做家庭丈夫,所以这些女性几乎没有选择,看起来她们正走向老处女。

    • 回复: @Sam Coulton
  247. Miro23 说:
    @peterAUS

    分工。人类最根本的东西。
    女人在某些事情上更胜一筹。我相信这是家、(小)孩子和金钱。只有我。
    人比很多人都更好。
    团队合作。永恒 在性别方面。嗯,那是,什么,五万年。显然不再是了。

    同意这一点。分工与爱情、浪漫没有太大关系,但需要搞好关系,陪伴才是可贵的东西。男性良好的收入和从不作弊也有很大帮助。

  248. awry 说:
    @Mr. Grey

    在西部片中,枪手们在草原上四处游荡,互相厮杀,食物和衣服不知怎的就自然而然地解决了。男人是一家之主,但如果女人不高兴,什么事也做不成。

    在边境,男性与女性的比例为 10 或 100,而且(毫不奇怪)这些女性中的大多数都是全职或兼职妓女。

    • 回复: @Mr. Grey
  249. Isabella 说:

    “男人具有竞争力,并通过征服实现最高的繁殖潜力,”

    更多现代主义无知BS>
    尝试在主流参考框架之外更广泛地阅读。 有大量证据表明,直到大约 4000 年前帝国时代开始之前,地球上存在着大量的小群体,这种情况不仅不常见,而且会导致任何人表现出这样的行为。行为被社区驱使。
    社区在互助互利和为他人着想的原则下蓬勃发展。 整个社区的智力和福祉都得到了增长。 所有人都关心所有人,所有人都与所有人共享知识,制定并遵循的规则构成了这个系统。
    它被美索不达米亚的萨根摧毁了,萨根可能是和平邻国的第一个精神病统治者和入侵者,入侵和帝国思想的传播,工业革命和城市的发展,数百万人不知道如何种植粮食,甚至经常是在它的来源地,最后被迫与外族人混合,导致自我认同的丧失,从而自杀。
    人们自然而然地倾向于暴力竞争的这种观念被用来为军队和政治暴力找借口。 这对人类来说是不自然的——否则为什么会有一些人在训练营里尖叫着让小男孩刺伤毛绒玩具? 它被推动为那些掠夺他人土地和财富的人所使用的暴力行为开脱。 只有当大多数人承认这是错误的、病态的、变态的并且他们不会再接受它时,它才能被制止。

    • 回复: @Daniel Chieh
  250. @Achmed E. Newman

    我认为鲍比·里格斯扮演了绅士,让“女士”获胜。

    • 回复: @Achmed E. Newman
  251. @Jayne Says

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4349910/Feminism-BAD-two-thirds-woman-says-FAY-WELDON.html

    越来越多的女性不同意你的观点。其中包括主要的女权主义者。他们为什么不呢?右翼女性更性感、更聪明、更充实、更健康,并且与好男人拥有长久的孩子和婚姻。

    玛娜·布莱斯(Myrna Blyth)在《旋转姐妹》(Spin Sisters)中描述了所有现代女权主义如何是媒体和文化中央计划的产物。这太荒谬了。妇女生活在一个女性矩阵中,拥有全面的媒体和文化便利,但却构想出一个不存在的荒谬的“父权制”。你是洛克菲勒家族的产物,即使你声称他们反对你的议程。女权主义就是低智商。

    当代女权主义是昔日文化马克思主义共产主义的胡言乱语。女权主义的起源是共产主义。这就是为什么它正在摧毁西方经济。

    https://voxday.blogspot.com/2013/02/economics-and-fate-of-feminism.html?m=1

    女权主义将会消亡,因为它在经济上不可持续。如果没有大规模的强制措施,进一步的平等将是不可能的,这将引起恶性的政治反弹。

    “女权主义在结构上无法维持工资率和出生率,这意味着每个女权主义社会都不可避免地走向灭亡,就像无法计算价格意味着每个社会主义社会的灭亡一样。 “性别平等”之所以停滞不前,是因为它没有得到政府的充分执行,而是因为它正在与它所侵染的社会一起崩溃。

    性别平等社会的不可能与公平、传统宗教信仰、人权或人们对女性在各方面与男性平等的强烈感受无关。这是供求规律直接且不可避免的结果,因此,比人口几何增长超过粮食供应算术增长的马尔萨斯方程可靠得多。”

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1189894/Women-happy-years-ago-.html

    女性从未如此不快乐过。尽管女权主义取得了所有“进步”。

    因为女权主义是精神病的。比共产主义更具破坏性,因为它摧毁了国家。比国家社会主义更法西斯,因为它更具强制力。

    实际上,从凯特·米勒(Kate Millet)到弗吉尼亚·沃尔夫(Virginia Wolfe)再到格洛丽亚·奥尔雷德(Gloria Allred),每一位重要的女权主义者都患有精神病或遭受着深刻的创伤,他们将这种情况投射到社会上。

    女权主义也是犹太教的产物:

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Jewish_feminists

    女权主义是种族主义的。它破坏社会。它以人口和经济破坏告终。

    可以继续,但会留在那里。

    我也不知道你在说什么。 TERF 正在转向右翼,酒和泥浆的受害者以及 MS13 墨西哥人正在转向右翼。白人妇女要回家了。

    最性感、最性感的女性是右翼。左翼女性往往是臭味弱智、非人类的黑猩猩,她们被马特·劳尔和哈维·韦恩斯坦这样的人强奸,并乐在其中。因为他们的白痴无原则与他们的实际行为和认知为零。

    到 40 年,35% 的 2040 岁以上女性将是单身且没有孩子。年轻的女性一代已经看到了女权共产主义的成果,并且正在拒绝它。

    不管怎样,并不是一切都是mysogny女士,趁女权主义持续的时候享受它吧。整件事是一场巨大的狗屎测试,男人们必须回避它,直到它死去,否则每个女人都是穆斯林后宫的一部分,被关在里面,看不见。

    古罗马人和希腊人都有关于女性领导力的戏剧,它伴随着他们的文明的衰落。

    • 回复: @Rurik
  252. 我发现现在留胡子很流行。但许多留胡子的男人实际上看起来像留胡子的女人。
    我记得几十年前读到过有关西方精子数量减少的报道。我想知道罪魁祸首是什么。可能是饮食不当,生活方式过于安逸。
    男人绝对应该在斯巴达式的条件下成长,以便能够发挥真正的潜力。

  253. Agathoklis 说:
    @Sam Coulton

    希腊和瑞典最新的生育率分别为1.4和1.9。

    https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/sp.dyn.tfrt.in

    如果我们调整近四分之一的外国出生的瑞典人口的生育率,瑞典族的生育率为 1.5-1.6。与希腊汇率没有太大区别;值得注意的是,希腊刚刚经历了一场萧条,GDP 损失了 40%。

    无论如何,它们都低于替代水平并且不是很令人印象深刻。然而,我们遗漏了一些东西。即使孩子出生了,最好还是在一个稳定的家庭中长大。然而,瑞典在这方面显然远远落后于希腊。

    瑞典非婚生子女的可能性几乎是希腊的五倍。

    https://www.oecd.org/els/family/SF_2_4_Share_births_outside_marriage.pdf

    瑞典的离婚率是希腊的两倍。

    https://www.statista.com/statistics/612207/divorce-rates-in-european-countries-per-100-marriages/

    因此,尽管瑞典族的生育率略高,但这些孩子所经历的家庭结构质量明显比希腊孩子差。

    • 回复: @Sammy Coulton
  254. Corvinus 说:
    @Flint Clint

    “我只是做一些假设。他们可能是错的。”

    他们很可能是错的。

    “白人所承受的痛苦很可能是无限的……”

    也许你作为一个白人正在受苦。其他人,可能不会。

    “我假设你是婴儿潮一代。这对你来说可能听起来很疯狂。”

    哈哈,不是婴儿潮一代。您真的相信婴儿潮一代和犹太人是我们当前问题的主要因素吗?

    “阅读评论。年轻的白人明白这一点。”

    一些年轻的白人可能会理解。

    “对白人的迫害永远不会停止——而且最终会打破不和谐。”

    另一个假设。

    “当生活水平继续下降、公民素质继续退化(因为只有白人才有能力实现普世主义)时,心态就会改变。”

    事实上,所有人民都有能力实现普遍主义。

    “世界历史上最大规模的人民运动将伴随着冲突。这是绝对不可避免的。”

    我会等电影上映。看,对于像你这样的人来说,很流行这样说:“你等着吧,这场迫在眉睫的内战即将发生。一切都只是时间问题”。那你猜怎么着?更多的等待、武断、等待、武断……我以为棕色的部落已经冲进了大门。保卫“祖国”的你还在等什么?

    “这是针对西方生活方式的公开战争,最终以消灭和奴役他们而告终。”

    由谁?

    “当婴儿潮一代不再有垃圾时,我希望你能和自己的人生活在一起。”

    更多鸡肉闲聊。

    “主张国家”的信徒有很多问题需要回答。”

    恰恰相反,我的白人朋友。

    “让我们看看人类历史的整个进程是否比婴儿潮一代关于命题国家、虚假熔炉、虚假多元文化主义和虚假一切的迟钝观念更重要。”

    国家的命题是开国元勋们的创造。

    “欧洲人将继续进行白人逃亡一段时间,直到他们意识到无处可逃。然后他们就会打架。”

    更多的希望和等待,对吧,圣布里维克?

    “他们将了解 2030 年左右女权主义者会发生什么——巧合的是,这也是美国距离解体还剩多久。”

    有趣的是,因为 Vox Day 说这一事件将会在这一年发生。你是他的贱人吗?

    • 回复: @Flint Clint
  255. 在接受《星期日泰晤士报》采访时,记者德卡·艾特肯黑德 (Decca Aitkenhead) 问克林顿夫妇,长着胡子和阴茎的人是否可以成为女性,切尔西斩钉截铁地回答说:“是的。”

    “跨性别”过去意味着改变性别。一个人会进行“变性手术”,然后努力获得法律认可。

    如今这样的人仍然存在,他们得到了法律的认可,大多数人都祝福他们。

    但我们也有更多的人接受了法律认可,但不知何故忘记进行变性手术(或“性别确认手术”,我们现在必须学会称呼它)。这些是有胡须和阴茎的女性。大约一半的人声称自己不仅是女性,而且是女同性恋。如果你拒绝承认一个持有女性证明的男性实际上是女性,那么你自然而然就会“跨性别者恐惧症”。即使您是女同性恋者或异性恋者,在发现“她”是解剖学上完整的男性时拒绝与这样的人发生性关系,也是如此。

    承认那些有变性欲的人的想法 不能 改变性别却无意这样做不仅是荒谬的,也不仅仅是疯狂的。这是SJW利用其权力羞辱普通民众的一个例子。你的理性、你的常识、你的观察力,这些都不重要。是非由党决定,如果你质疑它,你就有祸了。

    幸运的是,人们并不像觉醒党认为的那样愚蠢或顺从。党的做法太过分了,必须予以纠正。

    • 回复: @HallParvey
  256. Anonymous[171]• 免责声明 说:
    @Kiel

    好点。正如斯宾格勒所说,一个人必须是他出生的时代的人,而不是其他的时代的人。生活若要美好,就必须艰难;而且,在任何充满活力的社会中,人们都会在精神上和身体上为值得为之而死的事情做好准备,而不是花时间担心自己会死于什么。当白人抛弃美国的现代生活,从观看美国国家橄榄球联盟(NFL)或相信福克斯新闻的可悲习惯开始,他们的生活将会变得更加充实。美国的白人妇女就像流浪猫一样,会站在 CNN 所说的获胜方一边,直到她们自己的前门被野蛮人用砍刀踢开。

    • 同意: Kiel
    • 回复: @Kiel
  257. Alexandros 说:
    @AnonStarter

    它缺乏价值,因为它是犹太人的。

  258. @kerdasi amaq

    嘿,阿马克先生。根据我链接到的《巅峰愚蠢》文章,以及其中提到的泷先生本人(Takimag 的),显然是他那个时代的一位严肃的网球运动员,鲍比·里格斯在比赛前的几个月里故意没有锻炼或练习!在网球比赛中,这几乎是“操纵”输球。

    如果他赢了,就像你写的那样,他就不再是绅士了。

    泷提出的问题是,涉及的金额是否很多。这是一段非常有趣的历史,从那时起,女权主义似乎更像是一个笑话。

  259. @Mike Tre

    这在很大程度上听起来是对的。当库尔特小姐深入细节时,例如她关于乔·麦卡锡的书,她的律师逻辑给我留下了深刻的印象。我没有读过,只是她的摘录。我一直想读它,你刚刚提醒了我。谢谢!

  260. @Achmed E. Newman

    哦,我看到彼得·哈里斯不同意。我的天啊!哈里斯先生,哪一部分?你不同意库尔特小姐单身吗?她有亲自告诉你她已经结婚了吗? (嘘,她让你失望了,伙计……对不起……还有其他又高又瘦的金发保守自由主义小妞……继续吧 TSBLC-Cupid.com。如果您想引起任何“兴趣”,请不要链接到您有关在家上学的任何帖子。)

    • 回复: @Peter Harris
  261. HallParvey 说:
    @Maria Elisa

    据我所知,它赢得了康斯坦丁的认可,征服了他母亲的心。

    所以现在我们知道了。基督教在西方世界席卷了一千五百年,是在一位有权势的女性的要求下进行的。

    女性一直拥有这种力量。父权制只是一个门面。王位背后的真正权力者一直都穿着裙子。

  262. HallParvey 说:
    @James N. Kennett

    在接受《星期日泰晤士报》采访时,记者德卡·艾特肯黑德 (Decca Aitkenhead) 问克林顿夫妇,长着胡子和阴茎的人是否可以成为女性,切尔西斩钉截铁地回答说:“是的。”

    她爸爸说这完全取决于这个词的定义是什么。在她的世界里,也许她是对的。

    • 回复: @James N. Kennett
  263. @Daniel Rich

    添加到挥发性混合物中

    在我的第一本书中,我深入阐述了美国的“军事化”和男子气概文化作为一种​​独特的现象,真正的美国现象。在一个对真正的战争及其代价几乎一无所知的社会中,以最怪诞的形式升华战争是不可避免的。这也是根深蒂固的自卑情结的正面。例如,美国国会中的大多数人从未穿过制服,但除了经常被国大党的腰包之外,他们有时怪诞的好战行为也是他们大多数人懦弱的一面。其中一些从字面上看就是cuck。

    • 同意: AaronB
    • 回复: @awry
  264. Rurik 说:
    @Jayne Says

    正确的人讨厌女性并且不承认女性的政治事业,

    我们当然不讨厌女人。事实上恰恰相反。你误认为“仇恨”的是我们对像你这样的怪诞反女性的本能反应。

    但是,你的基本另类右翼男人对真实的、活着的、会呼吸的女士的感觉,她们的灵魂完好无损(就像这篇文章中的一些人一样),我们会为了保护她们而杀人。

    并将它们视为上帝创造的不可言喻的巅峰。事实上,我们中的一些人确实生活在他们各种各样的天堂魅力中。

    作为记录。

    请不要混淆卑鄙的“讨厌的贱人”——

    谁可以理解地引发呕吐反射..

    带着对我们来说最珍贵的东西..

    两者之间的差异再明显不过了。

    • 回复: @Bardon Kaldian
  265. @Isabella

    我想知道黑猩猩训练军士做了什么让他们的雄性黑猩猩如此暴力? 黑猩猩萨尔贡有黑猩猩入侵的先例吗?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gombe_Chimpanzee_War

    所有人都关心所有人,所有人都与所有人共享知识,制定并遵循的规则构成了这个系统。

    对世界各地早期部落和狩猎采集者的研究确实非常有趣,但它始终否定了你的建议。最符合你的建议的例子可能是西阿纳姆地的冈温古人,他们基本上鼓励将妻子卖给邻近的部落,作为贸易的一部分(仪式性的仪式)。 扎马拉格)。除了可能是许多澳大利亚当地人极度贫瘠的结果之外,这显然是一种“混合”传统,不允许任何遗传稳定性。

  266. refl 说:

    浏览一下评论,我认为有些人对《赫芬顿邮报》工作人员的照片发表了评论。我是唯一一个确信我在我进入的所有工作场所(主要是公共机构)中看到过这些长发、带着假笑的非角色作为实习生的人吗?
    我是唯一一个一想到要和他们中的任何一个人共度一个晚上就睡着的人吗?

    更重要的是,现在我明白了“通俄门”、特朗普精神错乱综合症、希腊主义和所有其他白痴是如何产生的:试着想象一下这些非实体在明天的新闻媒体上进行专业讨论。

    不,我绝对不像这里有些人那样厌恶女性。我只是很幸运,在春天被所有这些养尊处优的西方中产阶级跳过,而这对我来说是有可能的。我感谢上帝给了我一个明确的信号,当时间到了,我要给我的生活来一个 180 度的转变,并满足于一个有用的人。

    只是想象一下我必须去市场并参与这些......

  267. Rurik 说:
    @Flint Clint

    白人妇女要回家了。

    有些会,有些则不太会

    那些又胖又丑(从内到外)的人(他们可以从年轻的多样性中选择,因为他们是白人),不会用他们的“浪漫”来换取独身。

    而其他一些人,根本不会受到欢迎。这个星球上有一个有自尊心的白人会让他的狗和林赛·沃恩一起咕噜咕噜吗?更不用说他自己了!

    海蒂·克鲁姆“嫁给”了一名同性恋假发者

    嘿嘿

  268. @Rurik

    好吧,公平地说:大多数女性根本就不好看。这不是他们的错;世界就是这样。

    这里出现了性别/性心理的根本区别:没有明显高智商、没有吸引力、但在他所选择的兴趣领域取得成功的男性,如果可以的话,会用自己的智力来换取成为一名愚蠢的运动员;另一方面,几乎所有高智商但缺乏吸引力的女性都会很乐意用自己的所有智力来换取漂亮的外表。

    这就是本性。

    • 回复: @Rurik
  269. jo blo 说:
    @AaronB

    向任何孩子能够通过 NCLB 成绩测试的家长提供代金券。 每个孩子的平均费用每年超过10万美元。

    想象一下,钱进入了妈妈的口袋,而不是教育机构,妈妈们养家糊口,而不是福利。 削弱支持(D)irtbag政客的大笔资金输送,巨额福利储蓄,让妈妈们摆脱自己的官僚工作。 对抗我们当前文化毒性的主流的真正游戏规则改变者

    最重要的是,孩子们可以避免很多来自其他孩子、LBQT 和老师的欺凌。

    我们现行制度所教导的最糟糕的事情之一就是缺乏结社自由。

  270. Rurik 说:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    确实,外表对女人来说比男人更重要,但相貌平平的女人往往可以凭借她们的善良、幽默,也许最重要的是,女性气质(以及这个词所包含的所有含义)找到一个好男人。它不是 所有 关于外表。

    可以说林赛·沃恩比普通女性更漂亮。

    (通过在照片搜索中输入“普通女性”找到)

    哪个白人会更喜欢漂亮的泥鱼而不是相貌平平的女人呢?谁更有可能像最好的女人一样拥有美丽的灵魂、极好的幽默感、爱心、善良和关心?

    我和其他人一样欣赏美丽的女人,但对于陪伴,一般来说,七比九更好。尤其是如果她们是美国女性,她们的灵魂已经被女权主义污染了。在这种情况下,你最好养一只狗。

    • 回复: @Bardon Kaldian
  271. Harbinger 说:
    @Jayne Says

    我想知道胸罩燃烧需要多长时间,米莉·坦特会出现在论坛上。

    左派将身份和服从带入了他们的政治。例如,在你眼中,如果有人不同意左派的任何言论,他们就会自动成为“仇恨者”。
    你在这个世界上有一份工作。这项工作就是把婴儿抽出来并抚养他们长大成人。就是这样。没有别的,没有更多。但不,你想控制别人。你想把每个人都分到不同的盒子里。你不再快乐地生活在男人身边,你想要竞争并夺取他所拥有的东西。

    从小到大,在学校,我总是记得女孩。他们一直想成为男孩帮的一员。他们想和他们一起玩。他们希望被允许去他们的帮派房子。他们讨厌被排除在外,也无法接受男孩想和男孩一起玩。我长大了,一切都没有改变。她们接管了男性酒吧、体育俱乐部、男性俱乐部,要求平等,以至于现在你走进任何一家酒吧,都必须听到一群女巫的声音,她们用最大的声音尖叫着要成为占主导地位的女性阿尔法。 ,提高酒吧的噪音水平。

    西方女性是这个地球上最被宠坏、最娇惯、最受保护、最傲慢、最无礼、最愤怒、最仇恨的群体。这些白痴不明白的是,他们的男人牺牲了自己的存在,为他们的女人创造了一个安全的环境,而现在,她们通过女权主义,用铁拳对抗优越感和统治。这里唯一的问题是,男人决定干脆离开雌性种植园。婚姻一落千丈。关系也。这意味着当西方被入侵时,你们女权主义者将不得不抵御即将到来的移民父权制,他们不会像你们自己的男人那样向你们展示爱和感情,你们已经成功地反对你们了。你会被殴打和强奸。你会嫁给一个穆斯林毛拉或非洲黑人,他们会每天给你吸奶,不管你是否愿意,并让你把他的孩子推出来。你会做饭、打扫卫生,还要照顾他的其他孩子,还有他其他妻子的孩子,你会和他共用一个房子。
    女同性恋者将把婴儿抽出来。他们只与女性发生关系的选择将会崩溃。他们将装饰罩袍,他们的职责将是在家里抚养孩子。

    你本来做得很好,但你搞砸了!你决定反抗自然,而不是人类。你相信犹太人、马克思主义的谎言,而今天你就在这里,年纪渐长,单身,没有孩子,没有家庭,远离酒吧和夜总会,贴墙,浓妆艳抹,没有机会建立关系,但可能有些人为了某种目的而进行性行为。年轻的种马。你会变得又胖又丑。你用丑陋的纹身覆盖自己,下意识地警告男人远离,就像他警告颜色鲜艳的蛇、蜘蛛或青蛙一样。大自然要求你在男性面前屈服,而不是男性,但你无法接受这一点。

    等到tshtf甜心。当非白人群体横行时。当你指望白人男性同胞来保护你时,他们只是说“滚开,你们有平等,表现出来吧。”
    欧洲种族正在消亡,因为像你们这样自私的女人,她们想要出去工作,追逐绿色的马尼利希,这样你们就可以购买葡萄酒、鞋子、漂亮的衣服、纹身、汽车、公寓和出国度假。你向大自然竖起手指,向玛门鞠躬。你是一个失败的事业。
    我认为将来,他们会写欧洲女性,因为她们的男人因为厌恶、极度自私和对男性的仇恨而远离她们。
    你概括了当女性在社会中过得舒适时所发生的现实,而男性则看不到战争,必须为自己的生存而战。然而,这一切即将改变。战争即将来临,当战争来临时,不要指望男人成为你的救世主。你让很多人都尝到了酸味。你们通过你们的行为创造了厌恶女性的人,这与犹太人通过他们的行为创造反犹太主义者没有什么不同。但考虑到您已决定在不知不觉中采用塔木德教作为您的宗教,其原因是完全可以理解的。

    我从来没有想过我会这么说,但白人女性作为一个整体,是完全卑鄙、恶心、堕落、自私、傲慢、无礼的女巫,我绝对没有时间理会。我只希望我有一台时间机器,因为如果我有的话,我会回到过去,告诉我的祖先不要去打那场他们即将死去的战斗,而是离开他们的女人,移居国外,让他们的种族消失了,那么今天的女性就不会存在。当我想到当时人类为了让像你这样的鹰身女妖能够存在而做出的牺牲时,我感到非常悲伤。你们不仅不尊重你们的男人,也不尊重你们的文化、自然、文明和种族。你让我彻底恶心,而且我并不是唯一有这种想法的人。

    • 同意: Kiel
    • 回复: @Rurik
  272. @Rurik

    你偏离了主题(或者不是,这不是我一直想说的)。我不是在谈论像沃恩这样令人厌恶的荡妇或类似的贱人(我不关心媒体炒作的妓女)。
    也没有关于疯狂的现代放荡傻瓜淹没大学的事情。

    在我看来(我可能是错的,但没关系):一个思想健康、在他/她选择的兴趣领域取得成功的人会根据性别做出不同的反应。对我来说,这是显而易见的,不需要证明。

    我不是在谈论像已故史蒂文·霍金这样的极端案例,因为我认为任何正常的普通人都不会用自己的健康来换取这样的生活。只是,那些在一生中的大部分时间里都没有疯狂过的女人,以及那些有志于在自己的生活中取得更多成就而不仅仅是家庭生活的女人——期望她们会非常高兴自己的外表漂亮是完全正常的。青年(我指的是异性恋正常女性;而且,这与他们的世界观或意识形态无关,我可能会鄙视)。

    从历史上看,乔治·艾略特是个丑陋的人。戈尔达·梅厄也是如此,现在是最高法院的那些女人了。我敢打赌,露丝·B·金斯伯格 (Ruth B. Ginsburg) 会倾其所有的职业生涯,只为了在年轻时成为一名击倒对手。

    另一方面,那些看起来相貌平平的重要人物,比如过去 50 年来的许多顶尖科学家、比尔·盖茨或任何类似的人,都不会在意拥有六块腹肌或类似的东西。

    • 回复: @Rurik
  273. Mr. Grey 说:
    @awry

    在边境,男性与女性的比例为 10 或 100,而且(毫不奇怪)这些女性中的大多数都是全职或兼职妓女。

    是的,边境。许多西部片都发生在城镇里,有一个警长和一个爱唠叨的妻子,她不想让她的男人去找麻烦。

  274. Kiel 说:
    @Anonymous

    “美国的白人女性就像流浪猫一样,会站在 CNN 所说的获胜方一边,直到她们自己的前门被野蛮人用砍刀踢开。”

    漂亮的声明,如果您允许我添加:

    ”。 。 。这些野蛮人是否会穿着连帽衫或代表国家的制服,这是一个悬而未决的问题。”

  275. Rurik 说:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    我敢打赌,露丝·B·金斯伯格 (Ruth B. Ginsburg) 会倾其所有的职业生涯,只为了在年轻时成为一名击倒对手。

    另一方面,实际上看起来相貌平庸的重要人物,比如过去 50 年来的许多顶尖科学家、比尔·盖茨或任何类似的人,都不会在意拥有六块腹肌

    我怀疑这在一般意义上是正确的,但肯定不是全面正确的。

    我怀疑艾因·兰德宁愿死也不愿醒来成为麦莉·赛勒斯。

    我敢打赌,迈克尔·摩尔会牺牲他的“才华”来有一天看起来像一个人。

    但我明白你的意思。

    • 哈哈: Achmed E. Newman
    • 回复: @Bardon Kaldian
  276. Kiel 说:
    @Jayne Says

    你说:

    “你现在不拥有、也永远不会拥有女人。将死。生气。”

    将死?真的吗?如何?因为你这么说?抱歉,这样不行。

    你说:

    “事实是,右翼人士是缺乏安全感、无用的动物,他们讨厌女性,并且不承认女性的政治事业。 。 。 “

    没有“女性政治事业”,纸杯蛋糕。

    简而言之,女性是这样的:

    “女人想要她们想要的东西,因为她们没有。但是,一旦他们拥有了它,他们就不再想要它,因为它不是他们想象的那样。”

    你们不是能够独立思考的成年人,你们只会鹦鹉学舌地模仿媒体或教育系统灌输给你们的东西。你是一个8岁的被宠坏的孩子,没有任何管教。

    感谢你与国家的共生关系(投票和无拘无束的统治的免费物品),你被赋予了将公共汽车驶下悬崖的方向盘(喜欢混合的隐喻)。

    女人想要她们想要的东西,她们现在就想要,她们不在乎谁提供它,或者那个人如何得到它(这就是为什么你们是坏男孩)。

    哦,你会用别人的金钱和劳动来拯救世界,对吧?你给世界的礼物就是告诉工蜂该做什么。

  277. Liza 说:
    @Harbinger

    对于一个父亲来说,知道他的女儿在电影中做令人恶心的性行为,一定很可怕,但他们又不在乎

    许多看似正常的白人男性也犯下了令人厌恶的性行为——但是在私下里与他们愚蠢的女人,而不是在电影中。据我所知,几乎不再有任何正常的性行为。哦,等等——他们有时也会拍摄自己。显然,看着自己做爱比实际做爱更令人兴奋。

    但是,嘿,让我们确保白人种族能够生存下来,对吧?所以我们可以参与越来越奇怪的性仪式,因为我们已经失去了一切正常的感觉。

    • 回复: @Harbinger
    , @Bardon Kaldian
  278. @HallParvey

    这位医生因对一个假设的六英尺高、留着胡须、希望被称为“她”和“夫人”的问题给出了错误答案而丢掉了工作。

    https://summit.news/2019/07/11/christian-doctor-fired-from-government-job-after-refusing-to-refer-to-6-foot-bearded-man-is-madam/

  279. Rurik 说:
    @Harbinger

    即将到来的移民父权制不会向你展示你自己的男人所给予的爱和感情,你已经成功地反对你了。

    斯堪的纳维亚国家(尤其是芬兰)是最早赋予妇女投票权的国家。

    瑞典副首相伊莎贝拉·勒文在没有签署历史上愚蠢的“气候”法案的情况下,要求瑞典用非洲和穆斯林移民取代瑞典男性,以表达自己的感激之情。

    “我们是一个女权主义政府,正如这张照片所示。”勒文说

    https://fortune.com/2017/02/04/swedish-deputy-prime-minister-all-women-trump/

    这里令人厌恶的矿渣要求更多的移民进入瑞典

    https://www.savemysweden.com/swedens-green-party-generous-immigration-policy/

    那不是很特别吗?

    她奖励瑞典男性给予女性投票权,用非洲人和穆斯林取代瑞典男性。

    一秒钟都不要认为女权主义牛会为被强奸的瑞典年轻女性哭泣,因为当谈到年轻漂亮的瑞典女孩时,她们需要克服自己,并接受第三世界计划。屈服于你的新穆斯林主人,是瑞典女权主义的方式。

    我认为在某些方面伊斯兰教确实优于(垂死的)西方(垂死的)自由。

    至少他们不会允许一些粗俗、憎恨男人的女权主义者破坏他们古老的社会和文化,并将他们的人民从地球上种族灭绝,就像西方女权主义者正在做的那样。

    • 同意: the grand wazoo
  280. @Rurik

    我敢打赌,迈克尔·摩尔会牺牲他的“才华”来有一天看起来像一个人。

    确实。但我谈论的是或多或少没有吸引力的男人,但他们在某种程度上仍然是人类。不是针对怪物。

    • 哈哈: Andrei Martyanov
    • 回复: @Sergey Krieger
  281. @Agathoklis

    您没有解释如何计算“调整”;这是完全没有必要的,因为瑞典人的生育率是众所周知的(略低于 1.7)。

    你关于金融危机的观点毫无意义,因为希腊生育率自 1.5 世纪 1980 年代末以来一直低于 1.5,早在最近的经济衰退之前就已经存在。瑞典的生育率从未低于1990,他们实际上在XNUMX世纪XNUMX年代经历了轻微的婴儿潮。

    此外,瑞典的离婚率是由瑞典的少数民族妇女推动的。瑞典人的离婚率低于希腊人。

    https://www.rhkauffman.com/swedens-high-divorce-rate/

    • 回复: @Agathoklis
  282. Harbinger 说:
    @Liza

    不知道你的回复要去哪里?
    女性对自己的身体拥有唯一的权力。任何人未经许可侵犯它,最终都会被关进监狱。他们犯下的任何恶心的性行为,他们肯定会同意,除非是被强奸。
    如果女性拒绝进行令人厌恶的性行为,男性和女性之间就不会发生性堕落。问题是他们不这样做。

    • 回复: @Liza
  283. Harbinger 说:
    @Rurik

    左派认为这个世界上的所有种族都是一样的。它认为种族没有成功,因为白人对他们做了不法行为,正如犹太人所教导的那样。因此,他们认为移民与自己没有什么不同,并会愉快地与他们同居并繁衍后代。他们对自己的国家、文化、文明或种族没有热爱。让左派掌权本质上就是把你的国家捡起来扔到篝火上。左派在很大程度上反映了犹太人的性格——革命和破坏。

    • 同意: Dannyboy
  284. @Miro23

    [该网站要求您选择一个手柄并坚持使用。]

    西班牙和意大利的男性都是软弱无力、被阉割的。瑞典男人是欧洲最有男子气概的男人。

    2/3 的南欧男性是住在地下室的非自愿独身者:

    https://www.thelocal.it/20181218/two-thirds-of-young-italians-are-still-living-with-their-parents

    特朗普在电视直播中对黑山总统进行人身攻击:

    • 回复: @Anon
  285. @Rurik

    瑞典的移民大致与性别相当;大量移民是来自拉丁美洲和东亚的女性。实际上,移民女性与瑞典男性在一起的可能性比移民男性与瑞典女性在一起的可能性更大。

    https://www.thelocal.se/20150402/single-immigrants-less-likely-to-settle-with-swedes

    五年后,只有十分之三的移民女性和近十分之二的移民男性与瑞典人建立了关系。

  286. peterAUS 说:
    @Commentator Mike

    听起来你那里的设置很好。

    适合我。不同的笔画……

    我认为关键(再次,不同的笔画......自由意志......),就是这样。思考。
    或者……哈哈哈……哪位负责人(合作伙伴)选择过程?上还是下?

    在“我的时代”(感觉是很久以前的事了……),这与“我”、“快乐”和“现在”无关。这是一个男人和一个女人所想、所感、所感是正确的。
    对于聪明人来说,欲望和性并没有被误解为爱。甚至爱情也不是选择终身伴侣的唯一因素。

    这个后现代/无论如何,世界是不同的。我们看到了结果。

    我周围的男人和女人当时并没有想到“我”,“现在”,“快乐”。所以……呵呵……根据……嗯……现代人的说法,我们都错了。然而,那些“原始”的人,包括我在内,已经与一个女人/男人结婚,拥有相当成功的孩子、事业……生活。 30-40,甚至50年了,仍然强劲。
    这些……呵呵……现代……人……好吧……看看你周围。

    当涉及“女人的事情”时,我发现世界已经从“我的时代”发生了变化。美好的。自由意志和自然选择也是如此。

    还有一件事。今天,每当我与女性接触时,她们总是能感觉到我是谁、我是什么。从来没有任何问题。很多时候好处很多。
    即使是最糟糕的女权主义者,在认识到永恒的氛围时也会做出很好的反应。至少她很小心。

    正如这里的一位负责人所说,在任何社交活动中,即使不是他的国王,你也可以是一个男人,一个阿尔法。
    任何。
    总是。

  287. Heartiste 说:

    @AaronB 毒害了非犹太人:

    “当你与强大的潮流作斗争时,你处于最弱的状态;而当你顺应潮流,然后按照你的愿望塑造它们时,你就会变得最强。”

    塑造变装皇后故事时代方向的受控反对案例

    “与基督教作斗争没有效果。”

    如果基督教确实像你默认的那样为欧洲本土人所憎恶,那么它就不会被他们所接受。

    “而今天,像沃克斯·戴 (Vox Day) 和布鲁斯·查尔顿 (Bruce Charlton) 这样的思想家只是从基督教中得到他们想要的任何东西。”

    与犹太教不同,基督教的目标不是寻找方法来制定一百万条法律。

    “跟随强大的力量,潜移默化地影响它的方向”

    是的,白人基督徒,支持我们的 Poztopia 计划,不要与之抗争。影响其堕落的形式。多么方便啊。

    “你无法与时代精神正面对抗。你会失败的。”

    ……任何强烈反对的潜在接受者表示。

    “但是另类右翼中那些微妙、适应性强、聪明的人在哪里呢?”

    就在这里,在你眼皮底下。呵呵。

    “他们为什么这么蠢?

    犹太自恋.txt

    “这些力量是我们无法控制的,我并不是在建议改变世界的策略。”

    ……现在这个世界正符合你的喜好。这么多争论和便利!

    “在可预见的未来,可能是数百年,觉醒将伴随着我们。”

    LMAO。许愿。二十年前,绝大多数美国人反对同性婚姻。如今,大多数人对怪异的异装癖在女厕所小便的行为不以为然。是的,我想如果对日本友好的觉醒世界永远把小丑靴套在白人基督教国家的脖子上,你会喜欢的,但现在时代变化得非常快。苏联共产主义持续了70年;鉴于其整个前提建立在一座充满谎言和赤裸裸的疯狂的山顶上,《觉醒》不会有一半的时间。

    你知道是什么让疯狂持续下去吗?宣传,还有很多。如果没有 chaimstream 媒体的力量源源不断地提供睡眠,清醒状态不会持续 100 个小时,更不用说 100 年了。剔除颠覆分子的媒体,噩梦就会从记忆中消失。

    “即使是传统的宗教团体也并不真正关心你私下做了什么或你想什么,只要你公开默许即可。”

    世俗犹太教并不完全代表世界上大多数宗教团体。

    “自由是内在的,而不是外在的。”

    无能为力的意识形态。

    “嘲笑只对那些认为你是他们中的一员的人有效——即群体内的人。否则嘲笑很容易被驳回。没有人关心那些他们完全不同意并被视为疯子的人的嘲笑。”

    这听起来就像你在 Psychobabble 101 中学到的东西。这是胡说八道。局外人嘲笑的力量在大规模审查、平台化和民族主义另类右翼非货币化运动中显而易见。屁股爆炸的反义词是冷漠。我并没有看到 TPTB 急于关闭它的态度有多少冷漠。

    如果这种嘲讽没有刺痛觉醒者,觉醒者就不会充满无幽默感、气急败坏的愤怒,也不会人肉对两种性别怀有古怪依恋的人。

    我为你那种软弱的男性口语创造了一个术语:运动学投射。

    • 回复: @AaronB
    , @Corvinus
  288. @Corvinus

    我不是 Vox 的支持者,但我发现他的论点非常有说服力,并且相信更多的人应该从中受益。这很有趣。如果你在 Instapundit 或美国保守党上提到他的名字,就会被禁止。为什么他会如此未经授权?

    因为卡克保守派知道他是对的。

    当然,您实际上没有提供任何论据。只是普通的解雇。

    我承认关于白人抵抗的观点是有效的。白人的自我否定很容易让人沮丧。但就移民而言,这种循环并不新鲜。

    也许这场人民运动将是世界历史上唯一一次没有伴随冲突的运动。也许你是对的,而马丁·坎·克里维尔德是错的。

    我们将拭目以待。

    但你关于国父们建立国家的主张是完全错误的。他们为后代建立了这个国家。

    你听起来像本·夏皮罗(Ben Shapiro)以色列第一基佬。他写了一整本书,说西方文明不包括基督教,也不包括欧洲人民,也不包括欧洲的地理。但这是来自耶路撒冷和雅典的“提议”。这绝对是一个可笑的谎言。

    夏皮罗类型总是引用单行,而忽略联邦党人文集、宪法序言、1790 年入籍法……以及《独立宣言》的其余部分。这是不诚实的,它是非历史的,它是透明的,而且是可悲的。

    《独立宣言》本身直接反对修正主义的平等主义解释,因为该文件还提到:[联合殖民地]与大不列颠国家、我们边境的居民、无情的印度野蛮人之间的联系
    庞大的外国雇佣军
    现任英国国王、外国人入籍法、我们英国兄弟的自由英国法律体系。

    依赖文件中的一个短语与整个文件的中心主题相矛盾,即联合殖民地人民是英国人民,独特且不同于外国人、印度人和效忠国王的英国人民英国的这种行为是一种无耻的欺骗行为,完全依赖于观众对历史的无知。

    说任何人都可以成为美国人,因为“人人生而平等”,这是一个无耻的谎言。人们可以合理地引用它作为证据,声称这意味着任何人都可以成为中国人。

    不要来到这个所有材料都触手可及的网站上,散布像本·夏皮罗这样的小江湖骗子、小贩和破坏者的谎言。

    不存在主张国家这样的东西。从各个方面来说这都是荒谬的。如果我只是滔滔不绝地讲一套儒家原则,我不会突然变成汉人。

    如果提议被拒绝,会有什么后果?什么保留了上述主张?称其为“小鸡”或任何你喜欢的名字。但我怀疑你会有机会找到答案。

    告诉我更多关于剩下的命题的谎言。然后告诉我你的种族。

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  289. AaronB 说:
    @Heartiste

    现在穿着白色西装的好人会温柔地引导你回到你的软垫牢房,Heartiste 那里,那里,一切都好。

    哈哈,最令人毛骨悚然的认证疯子回应了我的评论……

    • 回复: @James N. Kennett
  290. Sunshine 说:
    @Jayne Says

    你当然不代表我说话。也许如果一个男人真的拥有你,你就不会在这里吐出你的毒液了。你甚至可能还有一些孩子需要照顾,你也不会成为一个不育、永远孤独的猫女。我想你的盒装酒和阿普唑仑已经用完了,最好把它们整理一下。

    • 哈哈: Kiel
  291. Agathoklis 说:
    @Sammy Coulton

    希腊的离婚率为每 22 对婚姻中有 100 对离婚。如果你的数字对于瑞典人来说是正确的,那么离婚率仍然明显高于希腊人。

    瑞典族的生育率几乎和希腊人一样可怕,但家庭结构却是一团糟。

    • 回复: @Sam Coulton
  292. @Liza

    也许虚构的角色苏西·格林(Susie Greene)缺乏“礼貌”(呃),当她在情景喜剧“抑制你的热情”中斥责另外两个角色(拉里·大卫和她虚构的丈夫胖索·格林)作为两个人时,这并不是完全错误的。生病的变态刺…

    • 回复: @Liza
  293. Anatman 说:
    @bruce county

    有点像政府如何在枪口下强迫人们跪下以偷窃?究竟是什么如此难以理解?

  294. 非常感谢 Unz 引用了《每日风暴》。

  295. @Peter Harris

    和这样的:

    哦,讽刺的是,……你在这里,强化了本文的标题。
    像你这样的男性应该闭嘴走开,因为你强化了男性愚蠢、无知、用鸡巴思考的观念。

    由此得出:

    安·库尔特(Ann Coulter)恰好是一个没有胡须或阴茎的女人,她同意 峰值愚蠢 妇女根本不应该被赋予投票权。这种性别扭曲的胡言乱语仍然被大多数人认为是愚蠢的。然而,多年来对人权的缺乏理解和对社会主义的支持所造成的损害比这些新的愚蠢的东西要大得多。

    究竟如何?

  296. Corvinus 说:
    @Flint Clint

    “如果你在 Instapundit 或美国保守党上提到他的名字,就会导致禁令。”

    好吧,Sport,证明这个说法。您有责任提交证据来支持您的论点。

    “You actually haven’t provided any arguments, of course. Just the usual dismissals.”

    I am employing rhetoric with rhetoric. As your boy Day says, never use dialectic when in a rhetoric fight.

    “Its easy to be dismayed by white self repudiation.”

    What rankles you is that white people make their own decisions about race and culture. Must we think and act in the same vein as you do, lest we incur the wrath of being called a “cuckservative” or “race traitor”?

    “You sound like a Ben Shapiro Israel first fag”.

    I’m Pure Goy. Polish, Dutch, and German. I imagine it is easy on your brain to make that reference. In that manner, you don’t have to do critical thinking.

    “But you’re dead wrong about the proposition nation being established by the founding fathers. They established this country for the genetic posterity.”

    Clearly you need to be educated.

    开国元勋的后代意味着要建立一个独立的国家,建立一个充满活力和适应性强的政府,并拥有可以延展时代的自由。 托马斯·杰斐逊(Thomas Jefferson)是英国新政府的见证人,是英国法律和政治习俗中最自由的要素的独特结合。 尽管他担心从不了解代议制政府原则的土地上不受限制地移民,会破坏我们开国元勋的认真工作,但他预言说:“因此,我们将期望有最大数量的移民”。

    “Posterity” has three possible meanings: one’s actual legal descendants and heirs, one’s succeeding generations, or simply refers to later times. Samuel Johnson in his dictionary preceding the Revolution and in his edition contemporary with defines it as both descendants and succeeding generations. Note if “succeeding generations” means the same thing as descendants, or vice versa, it would have been unnecessary to include both definitions. He also cited to Latin, wherein posteritas refers means future generations, one’s actual descendants, AND future times.

    现在,约翰逊不是 1776 年成功的革命者的后裔,甚至与 1789 年的政治家无关。因此,我们可以忽略他和他的字典。 然而,韦氏词典同时使用相同的定义,并使用相同的语言。 我们如何处理“添加‘我们的’这个词必须仅限于后代?” 简单地说,我们将“我们的”添加到任一定义中,并且两者都各自独立——“我们的后代”、“我们的后代”——而不改变它们的关系或含义。

    Posterity also does NOT refer only to one’s own children, but as with the synonymous “legacy” also has the broader meaning of what we leave behind. The Founding Fathers were self-consciously leaving behind other than a genetic legacy. The motto “Novus Ordo Seclorum” reflects their legacy, setting up the mechanisms of government they invented to secure liberty against tyranny. Recall Article I, Section 8, Clause 4: “The Congress shall have Power To…establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization…” By definition, naturalization extends citizenship, and all the rights and duties related to it, to an outsider, that is, someone not the posterity of a signer of the document. The Founding Fathers clearly desired “to invite foreigners of merit and republican principles among us.” Indeed, the intention was whites and Europeans, but who imagined at that time non-whites and women would be able to embrace these principles? But there is no racial or gender criteria to adhering to republican ideals in the Constitution.

    现在,如果我们假设开国元勋的意图是将宪法限制为政府及其自身及其后代(其定义为个人血统的后代)的权力,则有意将其他人排除在政府的保护范围之外。宪法并没有为保护政府做出其他规定,于是开国元勋就使他们完全不受政府的保护,从而使开国元勋获得了由英国君主制享有的更广泛的权威,这受到了《大宪章》和英国《宪法》的限制。权利法案。 实际上,创建者及其血统被设定为具有不受限制权利的“贵族”,而所有其他人则被指定为没有权利的“农民”。 历史记录清楚地表明,开国元勋们没有参加这样的努力。

    • 回复: @Flint Clint
    , @Flint Clint
  297. Anatman 说:

    我不在乎它是否会害死我。当重要的时候我不会停止说真话。我可以毫不讽刺地诚实地说,我宁愿死也不愿妥协自己。

    • 同意: Sunshine
  298. Corvinus 说:
    @Heartiste

    LOL, the only reason why you opine Alt Right propaganda is because your gig as the preeminent “pump and dumper” came to a grinding halt. You hit the female wall, thus you had to reinvent yourself as this virulent white nationalist/protector of Western Civilization.

    The truth of the matter is that you promoted anti-Godly. anti-Western masculinity, which is defined by Kings 2:1-3–“As David’s time to die drew near, he charged Solomon his son, saying, I am going the way of all the earth. Be strong, therefore, and show yourself a man. Keep the charge of the LORD your God, to walk in His ways, to keep His statutes, His commandments, His ordinances, and His testimonies, according to what is written in the Law of Moses, that you may succeed in all that you do and wherever you turn.” Apostle Paul stated the following, “lest, when I come again, my God will humble me among you, and I shall mourn for many who have sinned before and have not repented of the uncleanness, fornication, and lewdness which they have practiced”.

    Moreover, you employed “game” not to secure a monogamous relationship and engage in coitus for the exclusive purpose of siring offspring, but to squarely make excuses on how and why to live the Don Juan lifestyle with all the trimmings. What is the end result? A bitter man in his late 40’s with supposedly a bevy of p—– pelts on the wall, still trying to chase young tail with his favorite lines, but without the trophy wife nor prodigious progeny.

    Shiv inserted into neck. Twist and turn slowly.

    • 同意: Liza
    • 巨魔: Sam Coulton
    • 回复: @Flint Clint
  299. @Agathoklis

    Your data is old (from 2005). The Greek divorce rate peaked at 30% more recently and declined as marriage faltered:

    http://www.ekathimerini.com/237261/article/ekathimerini/community/the-changing-greek-family

    So yeah the effective divorce rate of Greeks is way higher than for Swedes.
    And ethnic Swedes show no signs of suffering any social maladies from family life, whereas Greeks have a very high rate of homelessness, mental illness, etc, compared to Swedes:

    https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/09/130924103500.htm

    In the study, recently published in the scientific journal PLOS One, groups of students at Athens University and Linköping University replied to questions about their health and perceived stress. The results show that in every respect, the Greek students reported poorer health than the Swedish students.

    Greek marriage rate in 2005 (also higher than ethnic Swedes in 2005) didn’t protect them from anything. Nobody in their right mind wants to be Greek.

  300. Testing the “update my information” function.

  301. Miro23 说:

    The Founding Fathers clearly desired “to invite foreigners of merit and republican principles among us.” Indeed, the intention was whites and Europeans, but who imagined at that time non-whites and women would be able to embrace these principles? But there is no racial or gender criteria to adhering to republican ideals in the Constitution.

    No one at the time imagined that non-whites, women and non-Europeans would subscribe to principles of merit and republican principles.

    But have they?

    Or is it just predictable traditional racist ethnic/group advancement, that has nothing to do with “principles of merit and republican principles”.

  302. Liza 说:
    @Harbinger

    Sexual degeneracy wouldn’t occur, between man and woman, were women to refuse to do disgusting sex acts.

    That’s true. But some men (and women) still want it. That they may sometimes not have the opportunity to act out their urges hardly makes them worthwhile humans. I was trying (I guess unsuccessfully) to say that we’ve become a dissolute, debased, un-natural race, though I wouldn’t limit my definition of “debased” to sex matters.

    If I want to do it with an animal but am scared of the animal biting or scratching me, am I entitled to respect from anyone?

    • 回复: @Harbinger
  303. @Achmed E. Newman

    再说一次,你只是用你那些疯狂的废话来证明我的观点。

    • 回复: @Achmed E. Newman
  304. @Bardon Kaldian

    看起来需要多年的努力、毅力和坚持才能达到这个形状。

  305. @Peter Harris

    还没有“感兴趣”吗?请记住,有些女孩是铃声,并使用安·库尔特的照片作为头像。在你付机票钱之前,一定要让她看到网络摄像头,并让她做一个完整的 360 度旋转。

    • 巨魔: Peter Harris
  306. @Jayne Says

    杰恩 说:

    “I never been in love,
    I don’t know what it is.”
    她只知道是否有人想要她。

    (That was the only way I was gonna get this song outta my head … not that I don’t like Jane’s Addiction.)

  307. @Corvinus

    https://voxday.blogspot.com/2017/06/posterity-tk-vs-vd.html?m=1

    I won’t change your mind.

    But I invite anyone else reading this to look at the debate on the meaning of posterity between Vox Day and Tom Kratman.

    What you provided is a set of non sequiturs. What this debate provided was actual textual analysis based on the use of the word in all the founding papers, and the contemporary philosophy.

    Posterity means the genetic posterity.

    It’s just beyond ridiculous to think the founding fathers fought against their ‘British Brethren’ to preserve a nation where Muslims and Africans and Asians and Indians can click their heels 3 times say words and they’re American. And according to the latest progressive theories they don’t even have to be a citizen. Anyone who comes illegally must be made a citizen. That’s the new progressive hotness.

    The American nation is the bloodlines of the founders, just like it is the case for every other nation. Until the end of time you will never be part of the Chinese nation. The state is just a legal construct, currently occupied by many nations, and being held by a foreign alien and hostile nation acting as a mafia that wants us to engage in endless wars for their benefit. It’s quite extraordinary to listen to US politicians and see where their real loyalties lie.

    It boggles my mind how Cuckservatives can think the American nation alone in all the world and the west as an aggregate is a proposition but no other is in the world. That’s always argued by the children of immigrants and not Americans like Ben Shapiro.

    It isn’t a proposition. The reason the USA and Europe are going to fail is precisely because aliens don’t adhere to or recognise the proposition of the West, created for European Christians who adhere to the Greco Roman legacy.

    Muammar Gaddaffi and Mahmoud Ahmadebijad both mocked this notion of the proposition nation for it’s stupidity.

    What will actually destroy civic nationalism is the societally destructive results of immigration, multiculturalism, and globalism proving the concept false.

    I’m convinced. How much more total destruction of everything do you need before you stop submitting to invasion?

    These aliens don’t believe in the constitution. They will use their democratic rights to destroy it. They already are in the process of doing so.

    The education of the Civic nationalists are going to be extraordinarly painful.

    Even Angela Merkel disagrees with you now. It’s incredible.

    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-11559451

    It has failed. You can’t turn thieving somalis into good goy Germans. She said it’s failed. She just wants more of it because she’s a stupid woman and SJW who has to double down. If it’s failed, do it more. Just like you.

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  308. @Corvinus

    Heartiste is a man who simply identified the real dynamics of female attraction. That applies to all states of female relationship whether married or unmarried.

    Married men who run game maintain the attraction of their wives.

    20% of children in the UK of married couples aren’t the fathers. Add multiples for feminist Utopias like Sweden where such tests are illegal to conduct sue to women in government doing what women do in power.

    The sinful nature of fornication has nothing to do with what causes women to engage in it.

    You have the psychology of a cuckold.

    Heartiste could get married if he wished to. PUA has evolved now due to Tinder and Instagram and female hypergamy it allows. But the principles remain valid.

    But he can do more good in observing western women’s macro level shit tests and helping other men pass them.

    You are a globalist neo babelist. You aren’t Christian, by definition. So don’t intone Christian passages. Christianity is not globalism. It is exclusive just like the United States is exclusive.

    Muslims and Jews are excluded from Christian beneficence, for example. But I look forward to you saying that anyone can be a Christian regardless of adherence to the propostions at any given times. And white nation’s are actually excluded from each other according to Christian catechism if the effects are too disruptive.

    Why don’t you refer to the passages about being ruled by women and children and being dispossessed of your father’s possessions and vast out of your own lands as the wages of the sin of globalism. Looks like we’re there already. huh. Your non existent judeo Christian idiocy is neither jewish or Christian.

    By 2040 45% of us women will be alone and childless. Those are the wages of their sins.

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  309. Harbinger 说:
    @Liza

    “I was trying (I guess unsuccessfully) to say that we’ve become a dissolute, debased, un-natural race, though I wouldn’t limit my definition of “debased” to sex matters.”

    With that I cannot deny, not one word in fact and yes, I too wouldn’t limit it to carnal knowledge either.
    We are, as has purposefully been sculpted into becoming, an utterly debased race. We have no culture. We are no longer unique. We have lost our sense of purpose. There is no godliness within us, whatsoever. We are a people that seeks purely the pleasures of financial gain and sexual gratification. We are an utterly unnatural, immoral, unethical, materialistic, hedonistic, selfish, ignorant race today and we have become so in a matter of some 60 years of total, Marxist, brainwashing.

    Unlike the Weimar republic pre rise of Hitler (and post up until the end of WW2), our civilisation has been flooded with immigrants, to dilute who we are. Added to that the constant promotion of homosexuality, feminism, equality and diversity, we aren’t even shadows of our former peoples. We are an alien people to everything we were.

    The Jews knew this.
    The Jews are 100% responsible for this. They have absolutely no excuses whatsoever in denying so.
    They have destroyed our culture, our nation, our civilisation and our race and when Jews say it wasn’t them, it was. They stood idly by while their people annihilated every vestige of who we were. No Jew is innocent, for their apathy and unwillingness to see what was happening, what was being done to us, by their fellow Jews only goes to promote their complicity.
    Unlike Germany, pre WW2, we cannot unite behind a ‘Hitler’, a nationalist figure, because our society is completely divided with many, nay the majority adhering to communist principles accepting immigrants as no different to themselves and very much fellow [insert nationality] as they. Even the Jews in Germany united behind Hitler, fighting against communism, the overwhelming majority, supporters of the third reich and the removal of the globalist, read communist, international Jewish bankers aka Rothschilds.

    There isn’t a hope in hell of any nationalist figure attaining position in any western government. The last place help will ever come from is from the world of politics.

    The outcome is – total chaos, a complete annihilation of the system, the obliteration of every establishment within. The arrest of all within the left wing, subsequent trial for treason and a hell of a lot of executions. A complete culling of much of our civilisation. Effectively it would be to many of our fellow Europeans, the exact same situation Hitler and the third reich did to the alien Jews and the anti German Jews, within Germany post election in 1933.
    这永远不会发生。
    Western society is finished and should it rise, it will be a brown civilisation, with no history or culture, as that will have vanished.
    My prediction is Orwell’s 1984 and Huxley’s ‘Brave New World’. As long as people are rutting like rabbits (with no offspring) and taking copious amounts of drugs, the prison will continue. This is why the sexualisation and drug culture will not only continue but grow exponentially.

    Ironically, the only thing I can see stopping this from happening, will of course be the rise of Islam in the west and it turning into a Sharia state, forbidding usury, homosexuality, drug culture and everything else that the Jew is responsible in promoting. In doing so, the battle against Jewry, in the west will be won, but at the complete loss of our culture, our nations, our civilisation and our race.

    Bottom line is simple – heads Jews win, tails non Jews lose.

    • 同意: anarchyst
  310. This is a thread overflowing with powerful comments.

  311. “The truth is that Western civilization has been steadily feminizing for at least the last two centuries”. Total bullshit. So much so that I wonder what the authors motive is? Please tell us dear sage: what was the white males sperm count in 1820?

  312. Corvinus 说:
    @Flint Clint

    “Posterity means the genetic posterity.”

    That argument was utterly destroyed in the exchange, as well as the position that I articulated here. There is no direct mention in the historical writings of the Founding Fathers with regards to that peculiar definition. Vox Day listed “seven instances” in the Federalist Papers where one of three definitions of that word–not one of which specified “genetic”–was used without offering an explanation how and why they fit that definition.

    One of those statements he insisted referred to direct descendants, one of the three definitions of posterity–*”This dependence, and the necessity of being bound himself, and his posterity, by the laws to which he gives his assent, are the true, and they are the strong chords of sympathy between the representative and the constituent”. Except in the context of the overall work, Madison was merely referring to mutual relationship between a citizen and the government, one that required future generations of leaders to abide by the consent of the public. Vox Day takes this ASSUMPTION and submits it as “fact” that indeed this statement* undeniably fits the definition he proscribed. Furthermore, he offers not even a modicum of evidence that lends credibility to his insistence that note “none of the seven examples are clearly instances of Definition 2: succeeding generations”. It is clear that Day sold his audience snake oil.

    Interestingly enough, Vox Day uses rhetorical use of his Indian heritage, but he has yet to offer substantial evidence that he is of “red descent”, and he has only given assurances, rather than specific facts, that he has direct ties to a Mexican revolutionary and of the founding stock. Whenever people have dared to question his background, he tends to mock them, at best, and ban them, at worst. No one tells him what to do. So when it comes to the proposition nation, one of his pet projects, he doubles and triples down, despite being absolutely eviscerated by Tom Krautman–“Posterity does NOT refer only to one’s own children, but as with the synonymous “legacy” also has the broader meaning of what we leave behind. The Founding Fathers were self-consciously leaving behind other than a genetic legacy. The motto “Novus Ordo Seclorum” reflects their legacy, setting up the mechanisms of government they invented to secure liberty against tyranny. Recall Article I, Section 8, Clause 4: “The Congress shall have Power To…establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization….”

    So, by definition, naturalization extends citizenship, and all the rights and duties related to it, to an outsider, that is, someone not the posterity of a signer of the document. The Founding Fathers clearly desired “to invite foreigners of merit and republican principles among us.” Indeed, the intention was whites and Europeans, but who imagined at that time non-whites and women would have the intellectual capacity to embrace these principles?


    “It’s just beyond ridiculous to think the founding fathers fought against their ‘British Brethren’ to preserve a nation where Muslims and Africans and Asians and Indians can click their heels 3 times say words and they’re American.”

    Unless you are able to clearly trace your ancestors on both sides to the English prior to 1700, you have to go back. Consider Vox Day’s argument–From Vox Day–“If Americans can find the courage to consciously reject the myth of the melting pot and expel the Mexicans from the American Southwest, the Arabs from Detroit and the Somalis from Minneapolis, they can reclaim their traditional white Anglo-Saxon Protestant culture. This is highly improbable because so many descendants of that culture have rejected it in favor of the vibrancy of diversity while those who haven’t are far too frightened of criticism and social rejection to even articulate their thoughts.”

    So if we assume his argument is on solid footing, then only those of stout Anglo-Saxon heritage served as the conduit to Western Civilization superiority and American exceptionalism…which would discount tens of millions of white Europeans who came to our shores. But they didn’t build that, right? Do you really think they desired to have their culture being watered down by the non-English, who notoriously are of questionable character?

    “The reason the USA and Europe are going to fail is precisely because aliens don’t adhere to or recognise the proposition of the West, created for European Christians who adhere to the Greco Roman legacy.”

    No, NOT European Christians. The genetic posterity is Anglo-Saxon, i.e. those from the British Isles. “European Christians” are excluded. That is Vox Day’s argument, the one you are supporting. He stated, ”The Italians and the Irish were the original problem. They could have, and should have, been handled like the Chinese were. But they laid the groundwork for the Jews, the Germans, and the Scandinavians, who made things even worse. And they paved the way for the Mexicans, the Africans, and the Muslims. At this point, the USA probably can’t get back to 1986, let alone 1965.”

    Are you prepared to go back?

    “What will actually destroy civic nationalism is the societally destructive results of immigration, multiculturalism, and globalism proving the concept false.”

    You mean immigrants like the Irish, Italians, Slavs, and Poles? Did they not mix and mingle? Did they not share their genetic legacy with one another to create a unique “race”, that called “American”? Did they not collectively work toward developing an industrialized state, one that sold its wares throughout the world, and forged a mighty Empire?

    “I’m convinced. How much more total destruction of everything do you need before you stop submitting to invasion?”

    Assuming that there is this “invasion”, the question is what are YOU doing to stop it?

    “You can’t turn thieving somalis into good goy Germans.”

    You mean the Germans that Benjamin Franklin had described in the 1750’s? In his words, “Those who come hither are generally of the most ignorant Stupid Sort of their own Nation…Not being used to Liberty, they know not how to make a modest use of it…[T]he Spaniards, Italians, French, Russians and Swedes, are generally of what we call a swarthy Complexion; as are the Germans also, the Saxons only excepted…Why should Pennsylvania, founded by the English, become a Colony of Aliens, who will shortly be so numerous as to Germanize us instead of our Anglifying them, and will never adopt our Language or Customs, any more than they can acquire our Complexion”.

    Pray tell, how did the Germans become “Americans”? Proposition nation? Magic dirt? More importantly, was Franklin dead wrong in his assessment of this group?

    • 回复: @Flint Clint
    , @RadicalCenter
  313. Corvinus 说:
    @Flint Clint

    “Heartiste is a man who simply identified the real dynamics of female attraction. That applies to all states of female relationship whether married or unmarried.”

    He identified what he THOUGHT were those dynamics. Why are white knighting for a man who never married and has no children?

    “Married men who run game maintain the attraction of their wives.”

    Married men and women who pay attention to their relationship maintain their attraction of one another.

    “The sinful nature of fornication has nothing to do with what causes women to engage in it.”

    The sinful nature of men and women who engage in premarital relations has EVERYTHING to do with our current situation where divorce rates and broken homes are the norm. Why are you denying the fact that BOTH genders have an equal hand in these two problems?

    “Heartiste could get married if he wished to.”

    Now who is the one being a cuckold! He had every opportunity to find him a broad and raise a litter of shitlords. Instead, Heartiste chose to employ every trick in the book to bed women; when they refused, he labeled them “cold”. When they succumbed, he referred to them as “sluts”. Hypocritical, to say the least. It is obvious Heartiste’s father failed in his duty to properly instruct his son to refrain from trying to rut every women he laid his eyes on.

    “You are a globalist neo babelist. You aren’t Christian, by definition. So don’t intone Christian passages.”

    Assuredly I am Christian, and as a result, you got triggered. No doubt that is your guilty conscious talking.

    • 回复: @Flint Clint
  314. @Corvinus

    This is such a ludicrous strawman.

    Why would they seek to protect people who weren’t Americans from the American government? They claimed and offered no jurisdiction to such aliens. The posterity isn’t just the children of the Anglo-American founders but also their relations and brethren who had settled the colonies at the time. That’s why they referred to their ‘British brethren’. That’s also why the US was and is a Christian nation, because it was populated by Christians when it was formed. The fact Christianity wasn’t declared a state religion is irrelevant to that question.

    Recognising a separate American nation with a separate form of government meant the founders assumed more power then the British monarchy over Not-Americans?

    This is embarrassing. That is just nonsense. That’s like saying not granting citizenship to every Mexican who defecates in San Francisco is an exercise of power greater then the British monarchy. Aliens to the American nation were simply of no concern.

    You know, the one saving grace of the neoliberal cuckservative fake right in the past was that they could form a semi coherent argument, even if it was based on lies.

    What you are saying is just nonsense.

    Yes, at the founding the founding fathers excluded everyone who wasn’t American from the benefits of inclusion in the American nation. Those rampaging foreign mercanaries, the savage native Americans and even their British brethren in England loyal to the king.

    That includes also the Jews, and everyone else.

    That’s what a nation is, cuckservative. Exclusive. When are you guys going to learn that your opponents want you dead and all of your ideas eradicated.

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  315. I’m sick of hearing how men are engaged in a GIANT MALE CONSPIRACY to hold down women.

    1. 90% of court-ordered child support is paid by men

    2. No american woman has ever been forced into the obvious slavery of the military draft while tens of millions of men have been .

    3. 95% of the people in prison are men.

  316. @Corvinus

    I’ll preface my response by observing that even the globalist left state that the West has a racial definition: https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2017/07/trump-speech-poland/532866/

    See here. Come on. Surely Libertarians aren’t now more dishonest even then the ‘Feminine penis’ progressive left?

    Vox was not ‘utterly destroyed’ any more then he was ‘utterly destroyed’ by the neo-atheists in relation to say, the idea that religion is the great cause of human conflict – a claim that is no longer made due to his analysis. This ‘utterly destroyed’ phraseology again is reminiscent of the littlest Chickenhawk Shapiro’s videos. SHAPIRO RAPES THE CORPSE OF A LEFTIST (Who happens to be some random College drop-out). Don’t be infantile.

    “Vox Day listed “seven instances” in the Federalist Papers where one of three definitions of that word–not one of which specified “genetic” “.

    The Federalist Papers didn’t mention microchip technology either – why would they refer to a science that didn’t exist yet, any more then contemporary writers on the black death, now making a return to the West, mentioned germ theory which also hadn’t been conceived yet? They used language that was analagous to and derivative of what we understand genetics to be today.

    “This dependence, and the necessity of being bound himself, and his posterity, by the laws to which he gives his assent”.

    Who is ‘he’? The subject of the papers – the Anglo-Americans the Federalist Papers were written for.

    That is not the language structuring general relations between governors and governed. That statement was addressed to the beneficiaries of constitution alive at the time, and their descendents – who were giving assent to the new American nation’s formation of a formal state.

    I mean come on man. It’s unfortunate to see Scalia’s quip about mystical aphorisms of the fortune cookie now applies to cuckservatives.

    “Posterity does NOT refer only to one’s own children, but as with the synonymous “legacy” also has the broader meaning of what we leave behind”

    Then you again say ‘absolutely eviscerated”. No.

    What was the preamble of the constitution for? To state the constitution’s subjects, not it’s objects. The constitution was written for people, not property. The preamble was stating which people. Where the Federalist papers discuss property, it’s very clear they are referring to property. That’s actually a surprisingly weak argument. The constitution is a set of high-order laws – the subject of laws is people, not some inchoate set of values, principles, philosophies, property etc.

    Why would people who had just fought a war be so pathologically altruistic as to create a document that established rights for the entire world?

    “Recall Article I, Section 8, Clause 4: “The Congress shall have Power To…establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization….”

    Now you’re engaged in the fallacy of conflating a state with a nation. The American nation is distinct from United States citizenry. An American in China is an American. A Han Chinese in the United States is Chinese. All you have to do is observe how Chinese behave in Australia as Chinese and not Australias, as one of a myriad of examples, to observe the limits of magic dirt theory and tabula rasa man.

    I don’t care about Vox’s heredity. He has proven himself to be a very formidable and courageous intellect. Why should he give his enemies information for their edification? You can keep guessing. I’ll judge the man’s ideas by their congruence with reality – which I observe as being very congruent.

    “Unless you are able to clearly trace your ancestors on both sides to the English prior to 1700, you have to go back.”

    “So if we assume his argument is on solid footing, then only those of stout Anglo-Saxon heritage served as the conduit to Western Civilization superiority and American exceptionalism.”

    No, I don’t. Western civilization is based on the pillars of European peoples, Christianity, and affiliation to the Greek and Roman philosphical and legal legacy. I possess all of those attributes. In addition, I am a white man of European extraction of good character. Thus I am proximate and not remote from the founding identity of the United States.

    You’re also creating yet another stupid straw man.

    The Founding Fathers didn’t intend a single British ethnostate, but rather, a number of distinct British ethnostates as well as a few mixed white ethnostates. That’s why the United States was a Federal Republic. I mean come on. How can you act like the US was a monolith at the founding? Again – historical illiteracy from the self-proclaimed professional dork cuckservatives.

    I and other mixed whites who orbit those centres of identity have a place in the United States. I also have happen to have English extraction – not 100% but more then enough.

    If you recall, the founders were rather favorably influenced by the historical Greek city-states. This is exactly why citizens of the USA should be praying for a reasonably peaceful breakup and non-violent ethnic cleansing instead of desperately trying to preserve the unsalvageable.

    The real problem you civic nationalists have with history is that it clearly spells out the horrors that are likely on the way for the West. You avert your eyes and offer silly, nonsensical arguments about the intentions of the Founders in order to dispel the fear that is quietly gnawing. But it won’t work, and in any event, nothing you say, and nothing we write, is going to make any difference whatsoever. There is no doubt that back in 372 AD, there was a Roman living in the town of Marcianopolis who was looking on in disbelief as 200,000 desperate Visigoths were permitted to cross the Danube to protect them from the Huns. Because refugees.

    “The Italians and the Irish were the original problem. They could have, and should have, been handled like the Chinese were. But they laid the groundwork for the Jews, the Germans, and the Scandinavians, who made things even worse. And they paved the way for the Mexicans, the Africans, and the Muslims. At this point, the USA probably can’t get back to 1986, let alone 1965.”

    That’s very true. It’s too late now.

    Vox has also talked about the structural elements of the malaise. At the time of those great migrations there was also no welfare state. Removing that would go a long way – but that would require an assertion of some form of exclusionary American identity – which you repudiate.

    He has a point about the Irish and the Italians – whose corruption has now been subsumed into the Jewish corrupto-structures. But luckily, such questions of precision are precluded by the Jews use of the term ‘white’ – It’s up to them to define what needs to be eradicated, not the Alt-Right. Person’s phenotypically white who accept national distinctions I imagine would have their place in a nationalist political framework.

    Because there is remoteness and proximity of relations. A Dane might be very different to me – but they are still more similar then a Chinamen. I’m sure a pragmatic condition will be set in due course.

    I would be prepared to ‘go back’ if I were required to do so by the rightful American nation. But I don’t believe I would be required to do so, due to my skills, partially overlapping heritage and actual adherence to their propositions. In fact, I’d gladly ‘go back’ if it meant all the parasites and rapefugees and aliens in my nations of heritage were forced into the sea and sent back to their shit-holes, along with all the cuckservatives who enabled this set of conditions for catastrophe to be formed in the first place.

    Cuckservatives who accept no nation should be expelled from ALL nations.

    “You mean immigrants like the Irish, Italians, Slavs, and Poles? Did they not mix and mingle? Did they not share their genetic legacy with one another to create a unique “race”, that called “American”? Did they not collectively work toward developing an industrialized state, one that sold its wares throughout the world, and forged a mighty Empire?”

    The Empire has been the problem. Empire always contains the seeds of self-destruction because it attracts the denizens of the colonies, leads to debauched currency, decadence and imperial corruption – everything you see in our predominately Jewish-Mason pedo-elite.

    Irish, Italians, Slavs and Poles are not Jews and Muslims and Africans and Chinese. Superordinate and subordinate categorisation is valid.

    Some tribes in the United States have assimilated more then others. The first wave is not as bad as the latter waves. Vox is entitled to his views regarding the Irish and hopeless Scandinavians. Scandinavians in Minnesota have voted for little Somalia, and it was Irishmen Hart and Kennedy who passed the 1965 Immigration Act. It is Scandinavian women who are the most egregious and vicious feminists.

    Answering the very fraught furture question of who can be American will be informed by the tripartitite poles of ‘European’ ‘Greco-Roman’ ‘Christian’ as a good starting point, and then views on big government secondly.

    Vox has expressed support for Italians, due to their high IQ’s and distrust for big government. We shall see.

    What is very clear is that the cuckservative/progressive view that anyone is American as long as they say some words once is untenable.

    “Assuming that there is this “invasion”, the question is what are YOU doing to stop it?”

    I’m doing basically everything that can be done short of violence. Civic Nationalism would be wonderful it if was congruent with reality – I’m not opposed to it ideologically only pragmatically.

    It might be possible if whites stop engaging in self-suicide and self-evisercation and form a coherent body politic that is assertive and united. What you are doing is saying to whites that they must submit to the identity politics of other groups and condemn themselves to persecution on some kind of sado-masochism.

    I personally do not wish my children to be in the position of the Boer in South Africa – being slowly genocided even as they are relied upon to feed the socialist state. Fed utter lies by a corrupt system ‘The Bantu were genocided’ – where the Bantu population explostion under Apartheid was one of the largest in world history. Etc.

    “You mean the Germans that Benjamin Franklin had described in the 1750’s? In his words, “Those who come hither are generally of the most ignorant Stupid Sort of their own Nation…Not being used to Liberty, they know not how to make a modest use of it…[T]he Spaniards, Italians, French, Russians and Swedes, are generally of what we call a swarthy Complexion; as are the Germans also, the Saxons only excepted…Why should Pennsylvania, founded by the English, become a Colony of Aliens, who will shortly be so numerous as to Germanize us instead of our Anglifying them, and will never adopt our Language or Customs, any more than they can acquire our Complexion”.

    And yet Germans are still western, whereas Jews and Chinese and descendents of the barbaric Mexica tribes are not western.

    Again, Benjamin Franklin was right – but German immigration was permitted, and now a pragmatic approach is required to definitions.

    Germans have more proximity to Anglo-Saxon English then Syrians and Iraqis.

    Of course Franklin was right about German preferences towards liberty, and all the other nationalities.

    But we must simply make do with what we have – and thankfully, the progressive use of the pejorative term ‘white’ means that there is an awful lot of expulsions that may occur before any of these questions of European national distinctions need be addressed. But I know that I trust a German before I trust a Jew, or a Chinaman, or an Indian, or a Turk.

    What’s most tragic is that cuckservatism has created the conditions where the individual is being subsumed into the group dynamics of identity politics. I know perfectly well there are many admirable individuals among many nationalities, but in the end, the boats are going to have to be sunk.

    The doubled population of Africaby 2050 means that Italy alone is expected to harbour 60million Africans within that time frame, either settling or passing through.

    I will not see Saint Peters and Saint Paul’s Outside the Walls be turned into Mosques and stripped of their images of Christ and the Saints and the West for the sake of cuckservative sensibilities.

    So I hope you come to your senses. Luckily, you are now becoming increasingly irrelevant. Nationalism is going to be irresistable as the dynamic identified by Martin Van Creveld plays out, and the low IQ and the distorted lens of various groups enact.

    What’s so ridiculous is that you and I would probably share much in common, if you would just insist that other people have to bend to your requirements, and not vice verca.

    https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/06/somalis_have_changed_minneapolis.html

    If you want to say we must have Somali-America because Germans are different from Swiss then go live in Minnesota.

    Cuckservatism is a plague.

    • 同意: RadicalCenter
    • 回复: @Corvinus
  317. @Corvinus

    Heartiste is absolutely right about what attracts females. That doesn’t mean that what attracts females is necessarily moral, or admirable, or even desirable. It simply is, what it is. Heartiste has always expressed very articulately the moral quandary of the necessity of attractiveness.

    Women are inferior beings who need to be dominated and led. I don’t like that. In fact, I hate it. Being a man is a burden, so I can understand why so many men are giving up and becoming traps or recluses. Effeminacy is rife in Christianity. But that’s the underlying genetically and perhaps god-willed imperative of the female homo-sapiens. Incorporating that into my inter-sex relations, of course underpinned by some Christian ethics has been very successful.

    Heartiste is merely describing the trajectory of almost all men. Adoption of mainstream perceptions of female dynamics. Abject failure and humiliation. Reconstitution of behaviours and perceptions. Success. Digust. Realisation. Leadership.

    Isn’t it incredibly interesting that Heartiste was deplatformed, not when he was advocating solely sexual dominance, but when he started to advocate monogamy and male leadership and family for the good of civilization. Nothing is worse then when cuckservatives are complicit with deplatforming. No doubt if the Unz Review were to be deplatformed you’d be celebrating and tutting the same.

    You should be praising Heartiste for giving men destroyed by feminism a lexicon and manual by which to reassert natural law relations – which are what actually make idiot child neurotic self-destructive women happy. “I likes it when my hoes is laughing, that’s how I knows they asleep” – who ever said there is no wisdom in the black community?

    Divorce rape and affirmative action rape and welfare state rape are solely the fault of women. Cuck men like yourself who go along with these things do so just in the hope of getting pussy – but of course, you are despised instead, and these idiot women import actual patriarchies from Africa and the Middle East to put them in chains so they’re happy.

    As I said – 20% minimum of married women in the United Kingdom have children whose father isn’t their spouse. I don’t like having to deal with the reality of female hypergamy and female degeneracy and female idiocy but that is what it is to be a Christian man who leads.

    “Married men and women who pay attention to their relationship maintain their attraction of one another.” LMFAO.

    Yeah that’s it – just pay them heaps of attention.

    “The sinful nature of men and women who engage in premarital relations has EVERYTHING to do with our current situation where divorce rates and broken homes are the norm. Why are you denying the fact that BOTH genders have an equal hand in these two problems?”

    Broken homes in the United States are primarily a function of Africans engaging in their natural structure of family relations absent Jim Crow laws which preserved the black family.

    They’re also a function of the absence of Christianity – which is due to allowing so many foreigners who aren’t Chrisitan and hate Christianity like Jews into the country.

    Why are you complicit in Cultural Marxist dividing and conquering along identity vectors? I have zero interest in the gender wars. Women will continue to do what they want until it kills an entire generation of them who die in penury and solitude.

    It’s women who abort entire generations of western children every year. It’s women who import entire generations of aliens who will put them in Burkas and violently subjugate them in the streets and rape them (and they like it, and vote for more of it). It’s women who seek euthanasias primarily out of fear of pain. It’s women who seek to impose hate speech laws. It’s women who vote for corrupt government an ever increasing welfare state. It’s women who sleep with hordes of men and who initiate almost of all the divorces. It’s women who promote lies and fraudulent ideas like Climate change etc.

    Women are imbeciles. I almost look forward to white Sharia. As Michel Holloubeq describes in his works, the one grace of Europe under Islam will be the exaction of justice upon errant idiot women – but that will be a very bitter justice indeed.

    The most certain indicator of a Christian denomination in a state of disarray is female pastors, female priests, female dominance of the structures. Women destroy institutions.

    But it’s as Heartiste says. All of these misbehaviours are a desperate cry for men to lead again. Okay, I’ll lead. It’s actually amazing how things transform as a result. I’m not here for women to self-actualise. I’m here to lead. They come for the ride.

    “Now who is the one being a cuckold! He had every opportunity to find him a broad and raise a litter of shitlords. Instead, Heartiste chose to employ every trick in the book to bed women; when they refused, he labeled them “cold”. When they succumbed, he referred to them as “sluts”. Hypocritical, to say the least. It is obvious Heartiste’s father failed in his duty to properly instruct his son to refrain from trying to rut every women he laid his eyes on.”

    Heartise went through the natural life-cycle of a man dismayed by the realities of female dynamics. Cynicism and a being cavalier is par for the course. I’ve been through this myself. I’ve undergone exactlyt the same metamorphisis.

    Women need to be dominated for their own good. They derive zero enjoyment or grace out of despising weak feckless faggot males. It is embarrassing that they feel the need to import these smelly muslims and cretin Africans because of western effeminacy.

    I’ve seen it. 6 foot 5 Germans and Dutch men, huge, strong, handsome, smart – totally submissive to every half naked ofay savage. Vox is right. The Germans are suspect. But I hope that a lion arises amongst them again. I want to hear Germans marching again, taking back their country from the Jews and the Gays and the Sisters of Magnolia feminist cults operating in Germany.

    ““The sinful nature of fornication has nothing to do with what causes women to engage in it.””

    If women’s unconscious desires are met, they are much less likely to fuck other men and destroy civilization.

    You don’t understand those needs. Heartiste does.

    Heartiste will find a woman he can marry if he wishes.

    “Assuredly I am Christian, and as a result, you got triggered. No doubt that is your guilty conscious talking.”

    This is why there is going to be a Schism.

    You’re probably as Christian as Joe Biden and John Podesta.

    Fake Good Samaratinism Globalist Neo-Tikkun Olam isn’t Christianity.

    Judeo-Christianity doesn’t exist and isn’t Christianity.

    I’m not triggered, I was just amused at your idiotic conception of Christianity and illogic in wielding it against Heartiste. The sinful nature of fornication, as I said, says nothing about what induces the desire in women to fornicate.

    The only way absent coercion to compel women not to engage in wanton fornication and appetitive disorders is ironically enough to be attractive enough for a women not to stray.

    That’s what Heartise divined. And he deserves respect. Moron.

    Christian Nationalism is not going to be lose for the sake of cuckservative airs. Thank God for men like Vox Day, who win.

    Lol, white people need a General Zod.

    Trust me, I’m actually still a Civic Nationalist. I wish that other races and religions weren’t evil and destructive and really could be little high IQ proxy Anglo-Americans who allow freedom prosperity and small government.

    But that isn’t the world order. The pedo-Satano-Jew world order led by Satan doesn’t allow for this.

    All hail the forthcoming General Zod. May he conduct exterminatus on the cuckservative pedo-facilitators and satanic neo-babel globalists trying to bring a Luciferian world order to life.

    Damn, I hate cuckservatives. How I hate you spineless coward cuckolds. The Chinese have already shown that this Zionist Occupied Government and Jew-Mason complex can be opposed by simply enforcing your preferences against theirs of a pedophile trannie bug eating cannibal set of rutters and illiterates. But if Bill Kristol or Norman Podhoretz or any of the court Jews who want the west destroyed say ‘that’s rude’ you simply say ‘take my child and cut it’s dick off, just don’t call me a bigot’. If cuckservatives just said ‘no’, and meant it, we might avoid catastrophe.

    I look forward to when accounts can be settled. Good luck, General Zod-Chan.

    • 回复: @Commentator Mike
    , @Corvinus
  318. @Rurik

    They should be stripped naked, shaved, tarred and feathered, and driven out of town.

  319. awry 说:
    @Andrei Martyanov

    I am quite sure that more members of the US Congress and establishment served in uniform than their counterparts in the EU. Some of them were in shooting war too, even now, thank to the endless stream of US military interventions. Probably more members of the elite are former high school jocks than former nerds, at least until most recently. To simply write down American macho culture as “wusses and cucks” is an oversimplication, probably fueled by your specific Russian inferiorityjealousy complex.

    • 回复: @Andrei Martyanov
  320. @Flint Clint

    A lot of this is culture based. Someone once commented to Roosh that all these PUA game tips would be useless for trying to pick up women in Afghanistan or Saudi Arabia. The FemiNazis are not hoping for patriarchal muslims and blacks they let in to dominate them; they’re hoping to soften them up and educate and enlighten them so that they can penetrate with their feminist ideology into their societies and liberate their women, homosexuals and transexuals. And of course gender realignment and plastic surgeons would be loving it and getting richer, opening up new markets for their procedures and products, to name but a few interests that look for profits and benefits in this. The homo elite and lobby too, hoping for little Afghan bacha bazi parties of their own instead of it being the privilege of their NATO officers serving overseas – they all want a piece of the action. Ever wonder why so many young Afghan boys have hit the immigrant trail into Europe, and even the ones who are adults are pretending to be underage? All those EU ministers and bankers must be recruiting catamites for their pederast parties, but much is left over for the lower class molesters on the prowl around Europe’s railway stations at night. We’ll see where all this ends up.

  321. @peterAUS

    Now that dear gentlemen and ladies is the God’s honest truth. One sees it so often that one has to be deaf dumb and blind to not acknowledge it.

    Hope everyone has a Plan B.

    The BIS is orchestrating this phase of the economic cycle rather well. It will be global and it will be harsh.

    Maybe the sperm count will go up.

  322. denk 说:

    The decline of [白色] men

    Told you so….

    The [[[five liars]]] seem to have this inexhaustible supplies of 的pussies……[1]

    https://www.unz.com/jderbyshire/china-on-the-mind-is-a-sputnik-moment-coming-could-the-u-s-respond-if-it-did/#comment-3513087

    Dont believe me ?
    Another one coming up…

    Pence the 婊子,
    speech to Wilson Centre,

    ‘Im 100% behind the HK rioters in their arsons, vandalism and terrorism’

    [1]
    [[[five liars]]] = US, UK, OZ, NZ, CANADA,

  323. Corvinus 说:
    @Flint Clint

    Heartiste was making subjective judgements about what attracts females in order to justify his hedonistic lifestyle. His position on the “women are inferior beings” centered around secularist pursuits. The only “moral quandry” here is your approval for such conduct and how you are will rectify it with a higher power. Furthermore, Heartiste is describing what he personally believes ought to be the trajectory of men– modern women are essentially scoundrels and therefore today’s “men” have carte blanche to take advantage of their alleged fall from grace. Hey, it’s NOT their fault women are sperm receptacles, so PUA’s have no obligation to, for a lack of a better term, “save” them. Heartiste opined that he merely gave them what they want. How convenient for him company to then blame how traditional male-female roles have been subverted by liberals and SJW’s without consequences. What “advice” did he basically offer? Pump and dump. Marriage is for suckers.

    “Effeminacy is rife in Christianity.”

    This is Christian masculinity–http://cbmw.org/uncategorized/profiling-christian-masculinity

    “Isn’t it incredibly interesting that Heartiste was deplatformed not when he was advocating solely sexual dominance, but when he started to advocate monogamy and male leadership and family for the good of civilization.”

    Only when it served personally served him, not for the greater good of Western Civilization. Heartiste realized the well had run dry, so he embarked on a new career to make himself relevant. Had he been serious about marriage and children, there would have been patently serious efforts on his part to practice what he preached. You are being duped.

    “That’s what Heartise divined. And he deserves respect. Moron.”

    No divination nor respect for a man who avoided marriage and children like the plague.

    “Nothing is worse then when cuckservatives are complicit with deplatforming. No doubt if the Unz Review were to be deplatformed you’d be celebrating and tutting the same.”

    Actually, the deplatforming is ridiculous. Let the Heartiste’s and Red Ice’s of the world spread their word. But, as Vox Day stated, build your own platforms.

    “You should be praising Heartiste for giving men destroyed by feminism a lexicon and manual by which to reassert natural law relations…”

    Heartiste peddled his wares to single men who were not Christian. The Bible undeniably condemns adultery and sexual immorality, which includes sex outside of marriage, regardless of gender. Corinthians 7:2–“But since there is so much immorality, each man should have his own wife, and each woman her own husband.” Paul specifies MARRIAGE is the “cure” for sexual immorality, and absolutely called men into question for attempting to “take advantage of unowned women wandering loose”. Once married, men and women are able to fulfill their passions in a moral way. According to God, abstinence is His policy when it comes to sex before marriage. That is “natural law relations”.

    “Divorce rape and affirmative action rape and welfare state rape are solely the fault of women.”

    You mean the fault of both sexes.

    “these idiot women import actual patriarchies from Africa and the Middle East to put them in chains so they’re happy.”

    请举个例子。

    “As I said – 20% minimum of married women in the United Kingdom have children whose father isn’t their spouse.”

    The blame lays with men and women who have little bearing on how to stabilize a relationship and ensure that the foundation of family formation remains fortified.

    “I don’t like having to deal with the reality of female hypergamy and female degeneracy and female idiocy…”

    Male and female hypergamy, degeneracy, and idiocy. Be accurate, please.

    “Broken homes in the United States are primarily a function of Africans engaging in their natural structure of family relations…”

    The natural structure of African homes prior to slavery and Jim Crow laws was strong…

    https://wp.bridgewater.edu/mtembo/articles/the-traditional-african-family/

    …and Africans who settle in our nation continue to rely on that natural structure.

    https://hsp.org/sites/default/files/legacy_files/migrated/extendedfamilies.pdf

    “absent Jim Crow laws which preserved the black family.”

    You will need to prove this relationship, as I call bullshit. The onus is on you to submit evidence that lends credibility to your assertion.

    “Why are you complicit in Cultural Marxist dividing and conquering along identity vectors…It’s women who abort entire generations of western children every year. It’s women who import entire generations of aliens who will put them in Burkas and violently subjugate them in the streets and rape them (and they like it, and vote for more of it). It’s women who seek euthanasias primarily out of fear of pain. It’s women who seek to impose hate speech laws. It’s women who vote for corrupt government an ever increasing welfare state. It’s women who sleep with hordes of men and who initiate almost of all the divorces. It’s women who promote lies and fraudulent ideas like Climate change etc.”

    Do you enjoy erecting strawman after strawman?

    “But it’s as Heartiste says. All of these misbehaviours are a desperate cry for men to lead again. Okay, I’ll lead.”

    Explain exactly how you are “leading”. Are you married? Have five or more white offspring?

    “Heartise went through the natural life-cycle of a man dismayed by the realities of female dynamics. Cynicism and a being cavalier is par for the course. I’ve been through this myself. I’ve undergone exactlyt the same metamorphisis.”

    Heartiste went through the motions of men who seek pussy-plundering without the responsibility that entails masculinity and masculine behaviors.

    ““The sinful nature of fornication has nothing to do with what causes women to engage in it.””

    “If women’s unconscious desires are met, they are much less likely to fuck other men and destroy civilization.”

    Men’s AND women’s unconsciousness.

    “Heartiste will find a woman he can marry if he wishes.”

    He has a duty to spill his seed and create life, rather than being a parasite on our civilization.

    “This is why there is going to be a Schism.”

    你是基督教徒吗?

    “Christian Nationalism is…”

    矛盾的。

    “Lol, white people need a General Zod.”

    So why don’t you apply for that job?

    “Damn, I hate cuckservatives. How I hate you spineless coward cuckolds. The Chinese have already shown that this Zionist Occupied Government and Jew-Mason complex can be opposed by simply enforcing your preferences against theirs of a pedophile trannie bug eating cannibal set of rutters and illiterates. But if Bill Kristol or Norman Podhoretz or any of the court Jews who want the west destroyed say ‘that’s rude’ you simply say ‘take my child and cut it’s dick off, just don’t call me a bigot’. If cuckservatives just said ‘no’, and meant it, we might avoid catastrophe.”

    You have officially run off the rails.

    “I look forward to when accounts can be settled.”

    Tough talk from an Internet armchair warrior.

    • 回复: @Flint Clint
    , @Flint Clint
  324. Corvinus 说:
    @Flint Clint

    “Vox was not ‘utterly destroyed’…”

    I don’t expect you to admit that he had his intellectual hat handed to him. You are his bitch.

    “Vox Day listed “seven instances” in the Federalist Papers where one of three definitions of that word–not one of which specified “genetic” “.

    “The Federalist Papers didn’t mention microchip technology either…They used language that was analagous to and derivative of what we understand genetics to be today.”

    Vox was attempting to make a textual argument by employing the Federalist Papers, then ran afoul when he offered his own contemporary interpretation as to what he believed those documents meant when it comes to “posterity”. Krautman and I called him out on it.

    “This dependence, and the necessity of being bound himself, and his posterity, by the laws to which he gives his assent”.

    “The subject of the papers – the Anglo-Americans the Federalist Papers were written for.”

    Then you are faced with a conundrum. IF it is true that “Anglo-Americans” were the exclusive audience for the Federalist Papers, then non-Anglo-Americans are excluded. Vox makes the assertion that “true Americans” are ONLY those from the British Isles. Non-Anglo Americans are NOT part of the deal.

    “That is not the language structuring general relations between governors and governed. That statement was addressed to the beneficiaries of constitution alive at the time, and their descendents – who were giving assent to the new American nation’s formation of a formal state.”

    To the beneficiaries of the rights listed in the Constitution at present and in the future with the purpose of addressing how the governed were to govern through consent.

    “What was the preamble of the constitution for? To state the constitution’s subjects, not it’s objects. The constitution was written for people, not property. The preamble was stating which people. Where the Federalist papers discuss property, it’s very clear they are referring to property. That’s actually a surprisingly weak argument. The constitution is a set of high-order laws – the subject of laws is people, not some inchoate set of values, principles, philosophies, property etc.”

    But Vox uses the Federalist Papers in his argument. Are you admitting that he was improperly employing them?

    “Now you’re engaged in the fallacy of conflating a state with a nation. The American nation is distinct from United States citizenry.”

    The American nation is an amalgamation of races and ethnicities. We are unique in that regard compared to the United States. Our nation is our citizenry. Our Chinese population traces its ancestry to the 1860’s. Their children and grandchildren are American. The United States is home to people of many different ethnic origins. As a result, American culture and law does not equate nationality with race or ethnicity, but with citizenship and permanent allegiance.

    “Why should he give his enemies information for their edification?”

    As evidence that what he says is indeed the truth. We expect nothing less.

    “In addition, I am a white man of European extraction of good character. Thus I am proximate and not remote from the founding identity of the United States.”

    According to Day’s argument, you ARE remote. You are the product of “magic dirt”. You are other than an American. You have to go back. Day says, “So I’m going to make some of you extremely uncomfortable here, because what I’m going to tell you – and this is not going to be comfortable for those of you who are US citizens – a lot of you are not Americans and you never were. Your parents aren’t, you’re grandparents aren’t, because Americans are defined very, very clearly and the United States Constitution was written for a very specific group of people and that doesn’t include immigrants, it doesn’t include refugees, it doesn’t include the great grand children of former immigrants, it doesn’t include anybody except for the sons and daughters of the American Revolution”.

    “I and other mixed whites who orbit those centres of identity have a place in the United States. I also have happen to have English extraction – not 100% but more then enough.”

    Woefully short, according to Day. You have no place here. You must go back. “It’s telling, is it not, how all of these foreigners and immigrants just happened to produce a new definition of American that included them, a definition that was not held by the Founding Fathers. Nor is it a coincidence that this self-serving definition was subsequently used to justify the largest invasion to have ever taken place in human history, an invasion that has severely weakened the once-mighty American nation.”

    你的祖先是那次入侵的一部分。你是一个入侵物种。

    “Removing that would go a long way – but that would require an assertion of some form of exclusionary American identity – which you repudiate.”

    I never made that assertion.

    “He has a point about the Irish and the Italians – whose corruption has now been subsumed into the Jewish corrupto-structures.”

    Are there Jews in your closet and under your bed? So how in the world are you going to recruit whites for the grand Civil War 2 project if you denunciate and denigrate European-Americans?

    “Because there is remoteness and proximity of relations. A Dane might be very different to me – but they are still more similar then a Chinamen. I’m sure a pragmatic condition will be set in due course.”

    White-non-white depends on context. In Nazi Germany, Jews and Slavs were not “white”. Among populations considered as white, some were deemed “higher grade” and “lower-grade”. Northern Europeans viewed Southern Europeans as less pure. Poles have a disdain for Russians with their Tartar-Mongol blood. The Lebanese pass for whites, but are not considered white. Among blacks, there were light-skinned ones who are perceived as more intelligent and thus had an ambivalent relation to the black and white community. Italians and Jews had their own prejudices not only against WASPS, but other kinds of “whites”. Ah, Goodfellas…

    “I’d gladly ‘go back’ if it meant all the parasites and rapefugees and aliens in my nations of heritage were forced into the sea and sent back to their shit-holes, along with all the cuckservatives who enabled this set of conditions for catastrophe to be formed in the first place.”

    So why not undertake that endeavor? Are you not willing to make the required sacrifices? If not, you are only contributing to the rot.

    “Cuckservatives who accept no nation should be expelled from ALL nations.”

    LOL. What a tired trope. You whine and complain like a little girl.

    “Irish, Italians, Slavs and Poles are not Jews and Muslims and Africans and Chinese. Superordinate and subordinate categorisation is valid.”

    根据谁/谁?

    “Some tribes in the United States have assimilated more then others.”

    Ethnicities, not tribes.

    “It is Scandinavian women who are the most egregious and vicious feminists.”

    I thought it was American females. Didn’t you get the memo?

    “I’m doing basically everything that can be done short of violence.”

    如?

    “And yet Germans are still western…”

    How? By magic dirt?

    “So I hope you come to your senses. Luckily, you are now becoming increasingly irrelevant.”

    White normies are the strength and savior of this nation. Hate fact, to be sure.

    • 回复: @Poco
  325. Corvinus 说:
    @Flint Clint

    “Why would they seek to protect people who weren’t Americans from the American government? They claimed and offered no jurisdiction to such aliens.”

    我从来没有提出过这样的论点。

    “The posterity isn’t just the children of the Anglo-American founders but also their relations and brethren who had settled the colonies at the time.”

    No, the “genetic posterity” refers to those from the British Isles only.

    “That’s why they referred to their ‘British brethren’.”

    No. Vox Day’s argument focuses on “British brethren” exclusively being the American children and grandchildren of those who came directly from the British Isles.

    “Recognising a separate American nation with a separate form of government meant the founders assumed more power then the British monarchy over Not-Americans?”

    Again, I never made that argument.

    “When are you guys going to learn that your opponents want you dead and all of your ideas eradicated.”

    你所有的谎言都属于我们。

  326. @AaronB

    Heartiste was not deplatformed for being a lunatic, or for being creepy. There are many thousands of such people whose internet presence is tolerated.

    the chaimstream media

    Beneath Heartiste’s ridicule and contempt, there is a nugget of truth: that Jewish opinions are strongly over-represented in the mainstream media, and that this is not always in the interests of 97.5% of Americans.

    It is a taboo to draw attention to this, or to any other aspect of Jewish power. At his best, Heartiste not only does so, his verbal fluency makes readers gasp with astonishment and disapproval at the breaking of the taboo; and then realise that, yes, there is an element of truth there that you will never read about in newspapers or see on TV.

    And that is why he was deplatformed.

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  327. Dannyboy 说:
    @AaronB

    好样的犹太老鼠亚伦。

    Friend of the White Man and All Around Lover of European Christian Civilization has just the remedy for our current malaise…lol

  328. Dannyboy 说:

    White normies are the strength and savior of this nation. Hate fact, to be sure.

    White Leftist traitors and their children will die even more horribly than Niggers and Jews.

    Ponder that. 🙂

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  329. obwandiyag 说:
    @Harbinger

    I disagree. Maybe what you say about women was true 30-40 years ago.

    But now, 40-year-olds act and dress and talk like pre-teens because that is all they know.

    They think that all grown-up women talk in creaky voice (OK. Vocal fry if you prefer). Because all they know are grown-up women who talk like that. They think all grown-up women talk like Valley Girls because all the women they know, even the PhDs who opine on foreign policy matters on Meet the Press, talk like Valley Girls.

    For that matter, they think that all grown-up men wear shorts, if you can believe it. Shorts are a sign of maturity and adulthood or something. The thing that gets me is 60 year old men in shorts who don’t even see anything wrong with it. That’s because jocks won, freaks lost. Freaks wouldn’t be caught dead in shorts, except in cut-offs on a hot day in Texas at Hippie Hollow.

  330. denk 说:

    the Decline of Men and . . . Truth-telling . .

    母狗 are notorious psychopaths.

    展览 2001,
    Mike Pence speech to Wilson Centre.

    想象,
    Every sentence is a lie.

    Pence the bitch

    ‘We aint trying to contain China’

    说谎者

    ‘We aint trying to isolate China’

    fucking liar

    ‘IM fully behind the Hk terrorists’

    A gawd damned pussy

    ‘I condemn Muslim oppression in Xinjiang’

    The bitch is barking up the wrong tree of course.

    https://eurasiafuture.com/2019/08/12/unlike-fake-news-directed-against-china-indias-suffocation-of-islam-is-real/ [1]

  331. joannf 说:
    @AaronB

    “subtle”是什么意思? 从平等主义和集体主义中解脱出来要么来自外部压力(在全球主义中并不真正存在,没有北约),要么来自进化本身——这是残酷的。
    我可以看到伊斯兰教因其缺乏灵性而解构了马克思主义秩序,但伊斯兰教也有点集体主义。 尽管如此,它为个人主义提供了比马克思主义更大的活动空间,因为它拥有一千年的传统和阿拉伯心态,尽管这并不令人愉快。
    那是某种东西……所以马克思主义必须要么解构伊斯兰教并使其信徒全球化,要么遭受同样的命运,扬帆远航。
    或者可能会产生两者有益的淡化混合,就像在阿萨德的叙利亚那样——那是可以忍受的,“犹太教-基督教”的胡说八道就会消失。
    伦敦时报在 2016 年 XNUMX 月报道称,如果大学出版物“被认为冒犯了某些群体”,女学生将以压倒性多数支持对大学出版物进行审查。
    自然地,任何数量的真实陈述都可能是痛苦的或“被视为对某些群体的冒犯”。 最尖锐的是,任何暗示男性和女性在生理和心理上存在有意义的差异,因此在某种程度上应该具有不同社会角色的建议,都将被视为“冒犯”。 这突出了西方社会女性化的自我强化性质。 一个成功的男人可能有几十个甚至几百个孩子,即使对于最成功的女人来说,这在生物学上也是不可能的。 男人的进化策略是高风险、高回报。 女性是低风险、低回报的。” 想一想——我们需要阻止这一切……同时顺其自然,从内部去他妈的。
    这就是为什么我认为白人男性应该将伊斯兰教视为重要的新支柱的原因之一。 不要担心——事实上,即使在伊斯兰社会,聪明的女性通常也能成功——但左翼的韦斯特拉布尔不会。

  332. Corvinus 说:
    @Dannyboy

    “White Leftist traitors and their children will die even more horribly than Niggers and Jews.”

    In your dreams. Fortunately, we all know that you lack the guile and gumption to even put your sick fantasy into action. All you are doing here is spouting off.

    • 回复: @Dannyboy
  333. Corvinus 说:
    @James N. Kennett

    “that Jewish opinions are strongly over-represented in the mainstream media, and that this is not always in the interests of 97.5% of Americans.”

    根据谁/谁?

  334. @Corvinus

    Well I have to give it to you Corvinus, you’re incorrigible. If only Cuckservatives showed this degree of spirit vis a vis the enemies of the American nation, like the media. It is going to make no difference either. The Weekly Standard and National Review type is now obsolete.

    Heartiste’s findings were subjective only in the sense he was not running a randomised controlled trial.

    He was establishing correlations however. Correlations between male behaviour.and female response. Those correlations are very important.

    You must be blessed with happy spousal relations. I’ve seen countless men now who encapsulated genuine Christian masculinity based upon sacrifice, service and support be simply cut to pieces by women and their spouses. Be cheated on. Have half their property taken. Be treated like a sub-human by their wives as a scapegoat for unrelated grievances
    Those men are who Heartiste reached.

    Saint Augustine was like a Heartiste of the day. Heartiste has come full circle. He is simply correct about the nature of most women.

    Again, the dynamics of female attraction are unrelated totally to the sinfulness of intersex relations. Here, look man:

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-7596535/Men-psychopathic-traits-attractive-know-right-things-say.html

    Women are most attracted to Dark Triad traits. That’s why women are now saying this about cuckservative Christians:

    https://www.catholicweekly.com.au/for-want-of-a-lot-of-good-men/

    Note that she isn’t saying that Christian men aren’t observing Christian principles. Just that they’re autistic poor losers who are socially impaired. Vox defines it as Churchianity. That’s what Heartiste means. Attractiveness a substitute for observance of Christian Principle. Necessarily.

    So stop being a classic cuckservative who attacks men on the right for no reason.

    You encapsulate what Anna is talking about. Cuckservatives are so unattractive women are literally importing a different religion and races to replace you. It’s ridiculous.

    Lol I’ll find the Pew polls by gender on immigration sentiments. But who can forget the German and Swiss women with big signs saying come hither.

    Heartiste merely pointed out that women often do behave like scoundrels because it’s their nature. Men being destroyed could understand patterns. He’s saved marriages you dolt.

    And sociosexuality is a reasonable basis by which to analyse the mass replacement immigrant invasion. Men like you are so unattractive and submissive to men of other races women are shrugging.and continuing the shot tests, waiting to see what you’ll do, and your failing the tests every time.

    Give the man credit for coming full circle.

    As for the rest, when or if I have time.

    But it is hilarious seeing you cucks squirm and you try to resist the implications of the identity politics you have necessitated. It’s actually hilarious. You live in a parallel universe, as badly as the progressives. Tell us, why is Detroit now Detroit?

    And the way you fail to comprehend Heartiste is pretty hilarious. You would have been saying the same trite cacckapants twaddle to Saint Augustine.

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  335. Gyre07 说:
    @advancedatheist

    新世界秩序的所有成员都计划建造一座巴别塔来取代西方文化。当你想到这一点时,真是太邪恶了。但由于西方整体睾丸激素的下降,肇事者可能不必担心困惑的奴隶的生活和传统被少数富有的犹太人撕裂的任何影响,这些犹太人对任何民族主义运动都表现出强硬的态度。美国以及欧洲。

  336. @Corvinus

    Christian nationalism is an oxymoron?

    Lol. Please tell me you aren’t Catholic.

    It’s not an oxymoron in any way, shape, or form. The duty to Proselytise is not a duty to subsume all nationalities. God destroyed the Tower of Babel. Every knee shall now and tongue confess, within their own separate nations – which I’m Revelations remain even in heaven.

    It’s unreal, how Cuckservatives pervert Christian doctrine.

    https://thehill.com/homenews/news/455157-interfaith-group-warns-against-creating-second-class-faiths-in-us

    Just look at this bunch of dykes and soy merchants. I wonder who funds them and how that money is derived? They won’t even mention the name of Jesus Christ, these fake Catholics. Neo good Samartinism tokkun olam, and charity without justice, aren’t Catholic.

    They probably have nothing to say about homosexual Gustavo Vera so high on the Church hierarchy or the Pachamama now adorning the high altar on breach of the first commandment.

    I’m a Catholic. And yes, I think there will be a further schism. Licking nogs” feet isn’t Catholicism. The Catechism is very clear on the boundaries and limitations upon immigration with respect to disruption of native populations.

    Christian nationalism not only isn’t an oxymoron you idiot, its historically precedented. What would you call for example the conflict between Elizabethan England and Catholic Spain?

    The so called separation of Church and State has just left a Jewish state. By design. And it’s also left a spiritual malaise being filled by Islam. Christian nationalism is merely an acknowledgement that authentic Christianity will not survive if it is not expressed assertively.

    These cucks and pedo fake Christians are wrong, and like the cuckservative establishment are merely afraid that their flow of gibs for importing invaders will stop a flowing.

    You are quite wrong. The truth is that Jesus Christ said every knee shall now and every to the confess. The true oxymoron is non-Nationalist Christianity. Isn’t it hilarious to see how Jews tell us the opposite of what the actual implications of the faith are.

    “And they (the redeemed) shall bring the glory and honour of the nations into it (the heavenly city).”
    启示录21:26

    A nation is just a people. So these fake Christians are really against Christian people.

    Oh boy its going to be a clean out like no other.

    You just keep thinking it’s all internet speak projecting cuck.

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  337. Dannyboy 说:
    @Corvinus

    In your dreams. Fortunately, we all know that you lack the guile and gumption to even put your sick fantasy into action. All you are doing here is spouting off.

    Well, you won’t be able to say that you weren’t warned. Not that it would make any difference.

    The best part is that your kind will most likely be done away with by your “diversity” pets long before we get to you. Either way is fine.

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  338. Dannyboy 说:
    @kerdasi amaq

    Then by all means, go back to fucking Africa and die with the rest of your failed race, you stupid nigger monkey.

  339. denk 说:

    谈论 母狗, how can we forget,
    MIke [we lie, we cheat, we murder] Pompeo,
    Sheesh , she wear it like a badge of honor !

    Pompeo the 婊子

    ‘We’r 100% behind the HK terrorists’

    NOt only is this televised,
    The bitches broadcast their handiwork it to the world with glee.
    他们已经 提高的 plunge the art of color rev to a new 高度 low !

    ‘Iraq should listen to its people’

    https://www.sott.net/article/423122-Pompeos-advice-Iraq-gov-should-listen-to-legitimate-demands-of-raging-protesters

    Hey bitch,
    The Iraqis want you out !
    They didnt give you permission to re-deploy into their country ?
    https://www.veteranstoday.com/2019/10/23/iraqi-government-asks-un-to-remove-unauthorized-american-troops/

    Syria didnt ask you into their country to ‘fight ISIS’ 和“protect’ their oil fields‘ either !

    What a nasty bunch of 母狗 !

  340. Liza 说:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    @Bardon. Excuse me? This is a TV show? Never heard of it before. How many times does that loudmouthed female (?) say f**k? Do people actually watch this?

    • 回复: @Bardon Kaldian
  341. Miro23 说:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    peterAUS: “Would we really, I mean really, want it?
    我对此不太确定。”

    That’s the question, isn’t it? So far, the consensus is against it. The loss of technological civilization is deemed too high a price to pay.

    It doesn’t have to be an either/or. Technological civilization can coexist with an (artificially created) pre-modern lifestyle.

    Strong physical activity is the key – For example, emulated daily with a gym, group run, regular sports etc. Also, a pre-modern diet isn’t so hard to duplicate. Not so much food, mostly fruit, vegetables, meat with nothing processed.

    This is quite straight forward, and IMO if most of society somehow got on board with it, things would quickly improve.

    • 回复: @peterAUS
  342. @Sunshine

    I truly and unironically wish and pray that “the patriarchy” rises up and takes back control.

    It’s going to be either Western patriarchy or mohammedan goat-triarchy. With either outcome the paranoid Chosen will be cast asunder. Hope springs eternal.

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  343. @Liza

    Do people actually watch this?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curb_Your_Enthusiasm

    遏制你的热情
    is an American comedy television series produced and broadcast by HBO that premiered on October 15, 2000. The series was created by Larry David starring as a fictionalized version of himself. The series follows Larry in his life as a semi-retired television writer and producer in Los Angeles and for one season, New York City. Also starring are Cheryl Hines as his wife Cheryl, Jeff Garlin as his manager and best friend Jeff, and Susie Essman as Jeff’s wife, Susie. Curb Your Enthusiasm often features guest stars, and many of these appearances are by celebrities playing versions of themselves fictionalized to varying degrees.
    ..........................
    Curb Your Enthusiasm has received high critical acclaim and has grown in popularity since its debut. It has been nominated for 38 Primetime Emmy Awards, and Robert B. Weide received an Emmy for Outstanding Directing for a Comedy Series for the episode “Krazee Eyez Killa”. The show won the 2002 Golden Globe Award for Best Television Series – Musical or Comedy.

    • 回复: @Liza
    , @Johan
  344. Corvinus 说:
    @Dannyboy

    “Well, you won’t be able to say that you weren’t warned. Not that it would make any difference.”

    More fantasy talk on your part. You’re not going to start nor finish anything.

    “The best part is that your kind will most likely be done away with by your “diversity” pets long before we get to you.”

    So now it’s “we”. I thought YOU were going to take matters into your own hands. Again, fortunately, you don’t have the skill set nor the high T rage required. It’s all talk on your end.

    • 回复: @Dannyboy
  345. @AaronB

    是的,屈服于小丑世界。 那可行。 埋葬那些自杀的年轻人。 屈服于邪恶。 顺其自然。 只需让自己沉浸在觉醒启蒙的温暖怀抱中。 抵抗是徒劳的。 谁需要白人男性? 让我们都成为一群雌雄同体的无人机。 我从未听过如此失败的废话!

    We are at the end of an age. This degeneracy is a symptom of corrupt human nature – it is the dying beast thrashing about before its rotten head gets sliced off.

    你想自责吗? 去头。 我会越来越大声地喊叫。

  346. Corvinus 说:
    @Flint Clint

    All you have left in your intellectual arsenal is calling me a Cuckservative merely because I oppose your position. It’s not a good look on your part. Heartiste based his “findings” on the past thoughts of men regarding women. They were subjective. He would link scientific studies as “evidence” of his position, only to not provide its proper context. Heartiste’s correlations rested on specious reasoning. Listen, I get it, you are his bitch as well. He can do no wrong.

    “Saint Augustine was like a Heartiste of the day. Heartiste has come full circle.”

    Just stop. Saint Augustine was a holy man, Heartiste is not. There are not even remotely on the same plane intellectually nor socially.

    “Here, look”

    I would surmise that you question the validity of today’s science similar to Vox…yet you link to studies that seemingly prove their assertions. The fact of the matter is that it is no secret that men and women are attracted to confidence. What the study does clearly present is that psychopathic men have a personality style that APPEARS attractive to women in dating encounters, and that those men will use their wit and charm to get whatever they want. So those psychotic men are internally programmed to purposely hide their intentions. Furthermore, men and women generally view confidence as a blend of highly desirable confidence and highly undesirable arrogance. Whether or not they take the next step and seek a committed relationship is up to each individual. Moreover, the source you linked to about a Catholic woman not being able to find a man is HER experience. You are taking a leap of faith here when making a sweeping generalization about all or most females in her position feel. “Just that they’re autistic poor losers who are socially impaired” was YOUR observation, not hers.
    So stop being a classic cuckservative who attacks men on the right for no reason.

    “He’s saved marriages you dolt”.

    No, he broke apart healthy relationships and marriages because he insisted ought to have a “harem”. Even Vox Day opposes such anti-Christian conduct.

    “Men like you are so unattractive and submissive to men of other races women are shrugging.and continuing the shot tests, waiting to see what you’ll do, and your failing the tests every time.”

    Yet another one of your tired strawman, which is the clear cut sign of a gamma. You never met me, do not know what I look like, nor have an understanding of my relationship history. It’s so over the top.

    • 回复: @Flint Clint
  347. Corvinus 说:
    @Flint Clint

    “Christian nationalism is an oxymoron?”

    One or the other, friend.

    “The duty to Proselytise is not a duty to subsume all nationalities. God destroyed the Tower of Babel. Every knee shall now and tongue confess, within their own separate nations – which I’m Revelations remain even in heaven.”

    I would submit that the majority of American citizens do not share the opinion opined by the Alt RIght intelligentsia and their acolytes that American civilization is being outright destroyed or on the brink of extinction due to “vibrants”. They most certainly have legitimate concerns regarding the backgrounds and behaviors of SOME of the newcomers to our land; however, Americans as a whole recognize immigrants historically have assimilated into our society.

    “成为美国的好公民并学习这个国家的语言是这里每个穆罕默德人的神圣和宗教义务,否则我们就无法正确地相互理解,”该地区第一任伊玛目的穆夫提·穆罕默德·萨迪克博士说。 1921 年,底特律新闻报道称,这是第一座清真寺。

    的箴言6:16-19
    主讨厌六件事,七件事令他憎恶:傲慢的眼睛,说谎的舌头,流着无辜鲜血的手,精心策划邪恶计划的内心,匆忙奔向邪恶的脚,虚假的见证撒谎的人,撒下兄弟间不和的人。

    人们以不同的原因看不起别人。 这可能与他们的学历,成就,服从……或其背景有关! 骄傲有许多不同的面孔:有些人“比你高”,而另一些人“比你高”。 一个人为如此出色的阅读而感到自豪,而另一个人则说:“我的书本并不聪明; 我很聪明”; 一个人以时髦为荣,而另一个人以忘却时尚为荣。 骄傲是一种阴险,无所不在的事情,特别是与人的白,黑或红有关的情况。

    申命记10:17-19 –上帝爱孤儿,寡妇和陌生人。

    一个人可以从这一简单而优美的经文中推断出,无论一个人的生活立场如何,上帝都会命令他的门徒有尊严并表现出尊严。

    John 4:1-42

    耶稣打破了社会和宗教习俗,以尊重撒玛利亚妇人的尊严。 他在公共场合与一个混血儿,道德和社会局外人有联系,并要求她喝水。 他表现出最高程度的尊严,每个人都是宝贵的。
    上帝命令他的门徒爱全人类。 当上帝与自己沟通时,当他使我们充满自己时,他就使我们充满了神圣的生命,充满了无限的爱,因为他就是爱。 他确认我们必须分享这种神圣的本性,以使上帝吸引我们自己,因为分享他的恩典才是他的本性。

    每个人的自然尊严都是平等的。 在这方面,人类并不优劣。 而且,上帝以祂的形像创造了我们。 作为上帝的儿女,我们被基督救赎了,并见证了祂神圣的召唤和命运,无论一个人在这个地球上的身分和身分如何。 否认这些真理就是否认上帝的权威。 上帝已将祂的子民确定为那些恪守祂的方式,人类的兄弟情谊的人。 上帝在他的旗帜下统一了人类。

    从一开始,这个教会就以其多样性为标志,这既来自上帝的恩赐,也来自接受恩赐的人的多样性。 在上帝子民的统一中,多种民族和文化聚集在一起。 在教会的成员中,有不同的恩赐,职分,条件和生活方式。 这种多样性的巨大丰富性并不反对教会的团结。 然而,罪及其后果的负担不断威胁着团结的恩赐。 因此,使徒必须劝诫基督徒“在和平的结合中保持圣灵的统一”。

    “I’m a Catholic”.

    Not if you an adherent of Heartiste. Clearly you are bastardizing the faith.

    “What would you call for example the conflict between Elizabethan England and Catholic Spain?”

    A civil war between two nations, with its Catholics perverting the word of God for their secular interests.

    “These cucks and pedo fake Christians are wrong, and like the cuckservative establishment are merely afraid that their flow of gibs for importing invaders will stop a flowing.”

    That is your opinion, not Truth.

    “Oh boy its going to be a clean out like no other.”

    Keep larping on that point.

    “As for the rest, when or if I have time”.

    Perhaps you may, but you are boxed in when it comes to the “argument” about “genetic posterity”, especially since I used Vox Day’s own words and logic against you.

    你必须回去。

    • 回复: @Flint Clint
  348. Johan 说:

    “Tocqueville was eminently realistic in the nineteenth century, knowing that “democracy” (meaning the ages of the masses) was inevitable. Hierarchy and a kind of aristocracy could only return later, in a very different form, in the twentieth century. ”

    Well, with the rise of the internet at the end of the twentieth century, the democratic publishing system, the publishing system of the masses , I guess we will have to extend the decline by adding the twenty-first century at minimum. Before after that, not even a seed of aristocracy will have a chance to start flourishing in situations other than in the only space safe from the ubiquitous presence and the terrorism of mobile and by technology ’empowered’ mass man, which is the private home. And even to keep that space safe from invasion by mass men and his political and corporate establishment representatives requires to set up many barricades.

    I disagree that it was inevitable.

  349. Liza 说:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    Curb Your Enthusiasm has received high critical acclaim and has grown in popularity since its debut. It has been nominated for 38 Primetime Emmy Awards, and Robert B. Weide received an Emmy for Outstanding Directing for a Comedy Series for the episode “Krazee Eyez Killa”. The show won the 2002 Golden Globe Award for Best Television Series – Musical or Comedy.

    I know this is a fallen world, but…

  350. peterAUS 说:
    @Miro23

    完全 错过 the point here.

    It’s NOT about a strong, fit and healthy body. Plenty of modern young men have that and still lack what really makes a man. Or, better, that man before this “globo-homo” paradigm.
    MINDSET. WILL SPIRIT.

    What do you think, how many men you know would go for combat sports? Not running, lifting weights, blah..blah…not TMA…combat sports. Say, a customized version of MMA?

    I’ll tell you about my experience. From 100 modern men of the age, say….below 40….5…tops.
    The 95 uncomfortable with the idea of punching somebody in the face; with the idea of being punched in the face.

    Compare those with the men who made “colonies”, from the USA to New Zealand. Who sailed over the big seas, landed in the new world(s) and took them from natives. Etc.

    Hard times make…..
    We are just “reaping” the benefits of good times.

  351. Johan 说:
    @Bardon Kaldian

    Jewishness all over the place here..

    • 回复: @Bardon Kaldian
  352. Johan 说:

    Of two of the West’s most brilliant men, Arthur Schopenhauer and Voltaire, the first anticipated the decline of society by the hands of women (feminism), and Voltaire, by the hands of the Jew.
    Let alone that these two are joining forces… an almost unconquerable collaboration, no stratagems and tricks of foul play and deceit are disallowed, but unconquerable because of the third factor, a factor denounced by many brilliant men as a system of government which inevitably leads to decline, the factor of democracy. Democracy means that you are empowered to be disempowered, because you cannot revolt against the situation, you must go to the ballot box… which comes down to the situation that you will be constantly fooled, and so you will have to continue to witness the ongoing madness, retardedness, corruption and worse than necessary decline.

  353. Dannyboy 说:
    @Corvinus

    Again, fortunately, you don’t have the skill set nor the high T rage required. It’s all talk on your end.

    Neither an elaborate “skill set “ nor “high T rage” is required to dispense with cucks like you, Corvie…lol

    As far as “all talk” goes, we do know you’re an authority in that regard.

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  354. Harbinger 说:

    “Democracy means that you are empowered to be disempowered, because you cannot revolt against the situation, you must go to the ballot box… which comes down to the situation that you will be constantly fooled, and so you will have to continue to witness the ongoing madness, retardedness, corruption and worse than necessary decline.”

    说得好。
    Although I would state that Democrates, back in ancient Greece certainly spoke sense, as democracy then was for and by the Greek people. There were no other peoples there, to get into positions of power and authority, to implement their cultural ways of life over the Greeks. Democracy can only work in a society where there is no ‘parasite’ tribe within, alien to the host peoples, who seek to control and eventually destroy it.
    And just as was foretold, by Enoch Powell in the late ’60’s here in the UK, we have along with the US, given the whip to the ‘pickaninny’. The blatant hatred of whites, being promoted in Hollywood, TV and the msm is testament to the warning of never allowing an alien people, positions of power and authority in your lands.
    Who gave them it?
    Who was behind all the mass immigration, race acts and NGO’s who push for minority control over the majority?
    Yes, they’re rhetorical questions as we all know who.

    • 同意: Dannyboy
  355. @Corvinus

    I’m not saying either Vox or Heartiste can do no wrong. I’m just reacting to the totality of your condemnation of both.

    It’s not a totally sound analogy obviously – Heartiste is not a Saint. But I was just trying to demonstrate to you that reform is possible and sins of the flesh don’t prohibit even Sainthood. And Heartiste’s writings are actually in my opinion more compelling at times then Augustines’ sometimes tedious solipsisms – although he was the first interior monologue on record so it was spell-binding at the time.

    As I said – Heartiste is now supplementing his manuals on how to reign in female excesses and maintain masculine dignity and wellbeing with how to preserve civiliation via marriage and monogamy, and how western men must preserve western civilization. That’s a good thing. I just don’t understand the ‘conservative’ (I’ll refrain from using the other term) impulse to destroy the good, the beautiful, and the true, based on a misconstrual of principle (there are always higher principles operative) or based on an aversion to tone (a class vice).

    To me it’s pathetic.

    Yes, but you don’t seem to understand what it is like for younger men brought up on fluoride, feminism, soy, corn-syrup, sugar, diversity, vaccinations full of unidentifiable toxins with no medical purpose and subjected to relentless propaganda. Men today can’t develop confidence organically when they have the testosterone profiles of a 97 year old man from 1913.

    They need actual manuals and handbooks on the mannerisms and interior thoughts that promote that confidence. You get it? I don’t understand why you can’t grasp what Heartiste is doing. Guys can’t and don’t and will never develop the confidence based upon understanding when they are relentlessly indoctrinated into lies about female nature and their own heritage.

    These young guys taught they every aspect of attractiveness is literally ‘toxic’ have to be rebuilt from the ground-up.

    Yes, but that Australian women’s experience is a shared experience. If you are actually Christian, it shouldn’t be news to you. But it was a huge story in that community in Australia because it stated an unsaid truism. It’s not just one woman’s experience.

    http://conference.scipy.org/proceedings/scipy2015/allen_downey.html

    40% of Millennial women will be unmarried and childless by 2040.

    Anna is just part of that cohort it seems. What makes is tragic is that she is attractive and actually wants to get married and have children, but she can’t find anyone aligned religiously and ideologically with attractive traits.

    Heartiste can help the guys with Christian formation develop those.

    Do you understand how important the socio-sexual frame is for preserving western civilization when you see that statistic?

    40% of women in a generation unmarried and childless within a decade is a world-ending catastrophe.

    But it’s the problem of the commons. No woman, ever, is going to be so autistic as to marry for the sake of an abstract. So it’s up to men in the West to be attractive, as opposed to unattractive, or these women are going to marry Muslims.

    你明白吗?

    If western men continue to behave as you would countenance, by 2040 almost half of the women in the West will be single and childless, and they will destroy everything.

    I know you’re aligned with me on the importance of the family – Heartiste’s models which actually match the preferences of young Catholic women like Anna, are how we preserve some residue of it, as it breaks down everywhere around us.

    • 同意: Sunshine
  356. @Corvinus

    “From the beginning, this one Church has been marked by a great diversity which comes from both the variety of God’s gifts and the diversity of those who receive them. Within the unity of the People of God, a multiplicity of peoples and cultures is gathered together. Among the Church’s members, there are different gifts, offices, conditions, and ways of life. The great richness of such diversity is not opposed to the Church’s unity. Yet sin and the burden of its consequences constantly threaten the gift of unity. And so the Apostle has to exhort Christians to “maintain the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace.”

    And yet Catholic Spain was perverting the word of God, instead of just being an emnation of the richness of diversity?

    “Matthew 15:25-28 destroys both the equalitarian and the immigrationist aspects of that narrative.

    The woman came and knelt before him. “Lord, help me!” she said.

    But Jesus replied, “It is not right to take the children’s bread and toss it to the dogs.”

    “Yes, Lord,” she said, “even the dogs eat the crumbs that fall from their master’s table.”

    “O woman,” Jesus answered, “your faith is great! Let it be done for you as you desire.” And her daughter was healed from that very hour.”

    Any Church that promotes: homosexuality, abortion, gender-theory, racial equivalence, ‘intersectional faith dialogue’, religious equivalence, ‘Judeo-Christianity’, female leadership and pastors, ‘Social Justice’, euthanasia, speech censorship, ‘Fixing the world (tikkun olam), immigration (which is in direct contravention of the Catechism and God’s view of the preservation of the nations) is not Christian.

    Our own Pope, with his outright Paganism and Gaia-fetish, is creating a crisis.

    I don’t mean in my opinion. I mean, all of the things above are not just heretical, they breach the most basic Christian dogma, let alone Catholic. I’m quite soft, and were I to get hit by a bus, I’d almost certainly wake up in a very hot place as I’m a bit cavalier with my state of grace. But all those things above are absolute red-lines – and I regularly see Protestants, Evangelicals and Baptists and Methodists promoting all of the above. It’s absolutely insane. Christianity isn’t a posture or some meaningless phrase.

    I will find you the hilarious material where a bunch of Jews pretending to be Catholic make money in Europe by bringing in Nigerians.

    I can’t speak entirely for Protestant and Presbo sects, since that’s always been a lucky dip.

    这是事实。

    Christianity isn’t ettiquette.

    Will address the other points later.

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  357. dcite 说:
    @Monotonous Languor

    “柳条人”(2006)。 你永远不会以同样的方式看待女性,你也肯定永远不会再将她们置于任何一种崇拜的地位。

    伙计,你真的很讨厌那个上面有那个稻草女人的稻草基座。 那么一部 70 年代 B 级电影的 D 版翻拍让你不再以同样的方式看待女性? 听起来很像你——女权主义者。 看看 70 年代的德国电影《魔鬼印记》(B+),该片因拔舌头的场景而闻名,尖叫声在汽车电影院中回荡。 80 年至 150,000 年间,约有 1500 万名女巫被烧死或以其他方式折磨和处决,其中 1680% 是女性。 遗憾的是,当前的民主党人没有这样的担忧。 但我离题了。 回到开车去。 我敢肯定,在那部电影之后,有一两个女孩再也不会以同样的方式看待男人了。 但我们大多数人都克服了它,因为毕竟它让20世纪看起来很美好,而且男人也做了很多伟大的事情。 就像拍电影一样。 所以你必须考虑背景,着眼大局。
    不过,这些媒体作品有很多需要回答的问题。 也许媒体的阴谋论是正确的。 你的例子和你明显的睁大眼睛、容易上当受骗,当然就是证据。 但是,正如我的前男友在讲一个粗鄙笑话时会说的那样,这只是一个笑话。 这不是真的。 你没有幽默感吗?

  358. @Justvisiting

    与此同时,《赫芬顿邮报》是由以色列创立并兜售的以色列,但精神分裂的雷布斯

  359. Corvinus 说:
    @Flint Clint

    Any Church that promotes: homosexuality, abortion, gender-theory**, racial equivalence**, ‘intersectional faith dialogue’**, religious equivalence**, ‘Judeo-Christianity’, female leadership and pastors**, ‘Social Justice’**, euthanasia, speech censorship**, ‘Fixing the world (tikkun olam)**, immigration** (which is in direct contravention of the Catechism and God’s view of the preservation of the nations) is not Christian. I mean, all of the things above are not just heretical, they breach the most basic Christian dogma, let alone Catholic.”

    No, a number of the things you listed as being “heretical” refers to your opinion.**

    I’m not saying either Vox or Heartiste can do no wrong. I’m just reacting to the totality of your condemnation of both.

    “But I was just trying to demonstrate to you that reform is possible and sins of the flesh don’t prohibit even Sainthood.”

    Except Heartiste has not reformed or made a Christian effort in reforming.

    “And Heartiste’s writings are actually in my opinion more compelling at times then Augustines’ sometimes tedious solipsisms”.

    Augustine was clearly more compelling in the written word, which is rooted in God’s plan.

    “As I said – Heartiste is now supplementing his manuals on how to reign in female excesses and maintain masculine dignity and wellbeing with how to preserve civiliation via marriage and monogamy, and how western men must preserve western civilization.”

    To rebrand himself, not because he has begun the conversion process in earnest.

    “Yes, but you don’t seem to understand what it is like for younger men brought up on fluoride, feminism, soy, corn-syrup, sugar, diversity, vaccinations full of unidentifiable toxins with no medical purpose and subjected to relentless propaganda. Men today can’t develop confidence organically when they have the testosterone profiles of a 97 year old man from 1913.”

    Your virtue signaling as far as what must constitute masculinity is duly noted.

    “I don’t understand why you can’t grasp what Heartiste is doing.”

    I fully comprehend the methods and motivation of Heartiste. His father did not guide him well.

    “Guys can’t and don’t and will never develop the confidence based upon understanding when they are relentlessly indoctrinated into lies about female nature and their own heritage.”

    You are projecting your own insecurities here. Men make their own decisions what constitutes masculinity within the basic framework. What you are saying here is that they lack agency unless they act in your prescribed manner. It doesn’t work that way.

    “These young guys taught they every aspect of attractiveness is literally ‘toxic’ have to be rebuilt from the ground-up.”

    That’s not how it is.

    “Yes, but that Australian women’s experience is a shared experience.”

    Among a group of women, but not all or most women who are Christian.

    “Heartiste can help the guys with Christian formation develop those.”

    No, he cannot. He has not repented and renounced the manosphere.

    “So it’s up to men in the West to be attractive, as opposed to unattractive, or these women are going to marry Muslims.”

    What statistics do you have that show increasing numbers of white women are marrying Muslims as a result of Western men being unattractive to them?

    “Heartiste’s models which actually match the preferences of young Catholic women like Anna….”

    No. He remains a pariah. He is not one of us.

    • 回复: @Flint Clint
  360. Dannyboy 说:

    Hey Corvie, you retarded little cuck, if you’re going to continue with your mental diarrhea/word salad (and we know you will) at least learn how to use the goddamn Blockquote feature.

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  361. denk 说:

    Trump, Pence, Pompeo, Rubio, Obama, BUsh, Clinton, Mccain, Bolton, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowicz, …

    Jeeze,
    These are…
    世界上最好的 murikkan males could offer ?

    博曼 的pussies had their chance and they blew it, big time.
    Making a mess of the planet, never mind 团结的蛇。

    Time for someone with 科琼斯 to make things right,
    Kathy Kelly for prez !

    https://sainthoward.blogspot.com/2014/

    https://www.antiwar.com/blog/2015/01/23/kathy-kelly-a-future-in-prison/

  362. Poco 说:
    @Corvinus

    Anyone that thinks a population of 1,000,000,000 people, mostly non white, in the US is desirable or acceptable is an enemy of the American Nation and a nutter. That would be you.

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  363. @awry

    I am quite sure that more members of the US Congress and establishment served in uniform than their counterparts in the EU.

    And EU is related to the US Congress exactly how? To find REAL military service of US Congress is very easy–the job you, evidently, didn’t do.

    probably fueled by your specific Russian inferiorityjealousy complex.

    Yes, I feel very inferior in a front of a military which can not win a single war since WW II, fighting mostly “inferior” opponents. Oh, I forgot Grenada, of course.

  364. Corvinus 说:
    @Dannyboy

    “Neither an elaborate “skill set “ nor “high T rage” is required to dispense with cucks like you, Corvie…lol”

    Actually, those two things are required, which you lack. It’s OK, we know that you just talk tough on the Web.

    “As far as “all talk” goes, we do know you’re an authority in that regard.”

    Except I’m not the one who is advocating to go full St. Brievik. Regardless, you’re harmless. You just don’t have it in you to do anything remotely like your hero.

  365. Corvinus 说:
    @Poco

    “Anyone that thinks a population of 1,000,000,000 people, mostly non white, in the US is desirable or acceptable is an enemy of the American Nation and a nutter. That would be you.”

    First, I never made that claim. Second, normies are not enemies of the American nation. Third, are you able to muster up a coherent rebuttal, or are you just passing through like you normally do?

    • 回复: @Poco
  366. @Corvinus

    有趣。

    Okay Corvinus – which things on that list are just my opinion.

    What you seem to think is required for Heartiste to ‘reform’ is for him to lie and resile from his positions on the nature of women which are accurate. That isn’t reform. That’s telling lies to conform to political correctness.

    “It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers-out of unorthodoxy”.

    It’s always the women-like men who are like the above as well, isn’t it.

    Heartiste has some good company in his observations.

    Heartiste recommending monogamy ‘is’ reform. If Cory Booker suddenly recommended free-market capitalism, Libertarianism and Christian-nationalism, that would be reform. Monogamy is not profligacy. It’s the opposite thing. So it’s reform.

    It’s reform. What in your tiny mind would constitute reform – not a change in the subtance, but probably a change in tone. That’s classic loser conservatism. Lose, just do it with a high tone.

    A total change in recommendations is commonly known as reform. He doesn’t have to go and get baptised yet. I suspect he’ll get there, because an empirical world view always leads to the Christian world view.

    “Your virtue signaling as far as what must constitute masculinity is duly noted.” What?

    Ah right. I see.

    So you think there isn’t an link between testosterone and masculinity. You think there isn’t a link between physical prowess and masculinity. Now it all makes perfect sense. That must be what you’re saying because I only mentioned testosterone and feminism.

    It’s so interesting when you talk to a Gamma-male Christian, eventually the mind-sludge oozes out.

    Right – so male traits aren’t masculine, got it. You’re on the transgender theory spectrum, well done. Masculinity is just whatever the feminine penis thinks it is.

    “I fully comprehend the methods and motivation of Heartiste. His father did not guide him well.”

    No you don’t. Not fully, and not partially. You still haven’t figured out that the nature of women isn’t a moral question. Any more then the nature of a caterpillar is a moral question. You’re a midwit. You don’t ‘fully comprehend’ much in general.

    “You are projecting your own insecurities here. Men make their own decisions what constitutes masculinity within the basic framework. What you are saying here is that they lack agency unless they act in your prescribed manner. It doesn’t work that way”

    No, men don’t make their ‘own decisions’ about what constitutes masculinity. This is the argument of transgender theory. You claim to be a Christian and you say that. Just nonsense.

    What you’re saying is also silly because it denies the function and empirical results of pedagogy. If you teach little boys to cross-dress and that transgenderism occurs in nature at a high frequency you get larger rates of claimed transgenderism. And homosexuality.

    If you teach children the Arian heresy they will believe Jesus and God are different beings and therefore can be set against each other etc.

    https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/brown-university-nixes-link-to-research-showing-peer-pressure-causes-gender

    “These young guys taught they every aspect of attractiveness is literally ‘toxic’ have to be rebuilt from the ground-up.”

    “That’s not how it is.”

    Yes that is how it is. If little boys are taught masculine behaviours like risk-taking, aggression and individualism are toxic, when women are attracted to these traits (they are), some have to be re-taught behaviours to attract women.

    https://www.refinery29.com/en-us/what-is-toxic-masculinity-social-manhood

    This article is typical of the type – and it’s a laundry list of unattractive cuck behaviours for men labelled as attractive. Men like this get conquered by actual men.

    ““Yes, but that Australian women’s experience is a shared experience.”
    Among a group of women, but not all or most women who are Christian”.

    https://www.crosswalk.com/family/singles/wanted-christian-men-worth-waiting-for.html

    Oh look, here is an article from 2013 repeating Anna Hitchings, just in the United States. Men don’t want to attend faggot churches where cucks say ‘masculinity is whatever I decide it is’ – yeah, Corvinus. Your panties and make-up and group-conformity are really masculine, it’s just about you being empowered to decide that masculinity is whatever you decide it is.

    I apologise for the invective, but I’m just trying to make a point.

    “Heartiste can help the guys with Christian formation develop those.”
    No, he cannot. He has not repented and renounced the manosphere.”

    He has nothing to renounce. What is attractive is not a moral question. I’ve helped 3 guys get married to Christian women I’d have been minded to marry myself, by teaching them not to behave like a passive bottom cuckservative. They were losing their frames, losing their value and succumbing to the shit-tests and panick and I got it back for them – adopting PUA and ‘manosphere’ material for them. And these are all guys who are ‘very’ serious Christians. For example, in a million years they wouldn’t say ‘masculinity is whatever you decide it is’.

    “What statistics do you have that show increasing numbers of white women are marrying Muslims as a result of Western men being unattractive to them?”

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/isis-jihadi-brides-islamic-state-women-girls-europe-british-radicalisation-recruitment-report-a7878681.html

    Remember Jihadi brides?

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/the-islamification-of-britain-record-numbers-embrace-muslim-faith-2175178.html

    Rates of conversion in Britain for example are on a doubling exponential curve. There isn’t a statistic yet, for women marrying muslims because they are more attractive then Christians. Because only an autistic incel would ever ask a survey question like that.

    But in normal-people land, people tend to get married to people they are attracted to, or convert to religions they are attracted to (absent coercion).

    And you know what? I don’t blame them. Because people like you pretending to be Christian literally repulse both women and men.

    “Heartiste’s models which actually match the preferences of young Catholic women like Anna….”
    No. He remains a pariah. He is not one of us.

    There is no ‘us’, Kemosabe. Conservatism in the US and Europe is on the way to death. It’s now obsolete.

    Heartiste has done more for men then you have. Understanding the nature of women isn’t a moral question.

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  367. Poco 说:
    @Corvinus

    In a discussion about open borders and immigration I asked, “What do you propose as an upper limit to the population of the US? 7 billion?”

    Your reply, 1 billion.

    Personally I don’t give a flying fuck if they’re white or non-white. That is too many people and not good for the American Nation.

    Second, you’re not a normie.

    Third, you’re a proven liar.

    • 同意: Dannyboy
    • 回复: @Corvinus
  368. Corvinus 说:
    @Poco

    “In a discussion about open borders and immigration I asked, “What do you propose as an upper limit to the population of the US? 7 billion?””

    IF I said 1 billion, fine. But YOU added the other part about it being mostly non-white, which is a separate issue. Try your bait and switch to be less obvious next time.

    “That is too many people and not good for the American Nation.”

    根据谁/谁?

    “Second, you’re not a normie”.

    I’m a middle class, married, white man with children who makes his own decisions about race and culture. I am decidedly a normie.

    “Third, you’re a proven liar.”

    再次,根据谁/谁?

    • 回复: @Poco
  369. Corvinus 说:
    @Flint Clint

    “Okay Corvinus – which things on that list are just my opinion.”

    –It’s so interesting when you talk to a Gamma-male Christian, eventually the mind-sludge oozes out.
    –You still haven’t figured out that the nature of women isn’t a moral question.
    –No, men don’t make their ‘own decisions’ about what constitutes masculinity.
    –Men don’t want to attend faggot churches where cucks say ‘masculinity is whatever I decide it is’ – yeah, Corvinus. Your panties and make-up and group-conformity are really masculine, it’s just about you being empowered to decide that masculinity is whatever you decide it is.
    –Because people like you pretending to be Christian literally repulse both women and men.
    –Heartiste has done more for men then you have.

    “What you seem to think is required for Heartiste to ‘reform’ is for him to lie and resile from his positions on the nature of women which are accurate.”

    You are putting Heartiste on a pedestal, equating him to reveled religious figures–when the fact of the matter is he continues his debauchery. There is no reform on his part. He is no authority on marriage and children, as he has no skillset in these two areas.

    1–“So you think there isn’t an link between testosterone and masculinity. You think there isn’t a link between physical prowess and masculinity. Now it all makes perfect sense. That must be what you’re saying because I only mentioned testosterone and feminism.”

    2–“Right – so male traits aren’t masculine, got it. You’re on the transgender theory spectrum, well done. Masculinity is just whatever the feminine penis thinks it is.”

    I never made these claims. You’re flailing, so now you have to make things up.

    “If little boys are taught masculine behaviours like risk-taking, aggression and individualism are toxic”

    They are being taught those values today.

    https://www.parenttoday.org/encouraging-risk-taking-in-your-kids/

    https://stanfield.com/horseplayandsocialskills

    “I’ve helped 3 guys get married to Christian women I’d have been minded to marry myself…”

    You are not putting Vox Day’s advice into practice–it’s not about you.

    “They were losing their frames, losing their value and succumbing to the shit-tests and panick and I got it back for them…”

    By being an elitist virtue signaler, assuming you took those men under your wing. And, yes, that is my opinion.

    “You still haven’t figured out that the nature of women isn’t a moral question.”

    It is decidedly a moral, social, and biological question.

    “No, men don’t make their ‘own decisions’ about what constitutes masculinity.”

    Of course men do. It is their liberty to embrace manhood in a variety of ways–competitive, assertive, goal-orientated, independent, protective. We have agency. You just do not like how some men go their own way.

    “What statistics do you have that show increasing numbers of white women are marrying Muslims as a result of Western men being unattractive to them?”

    Your source is a study about a subset of women who were seduced by a cult due to a number of complex factors–“a rejection of Western feminism, online contact with recruiters who offer marriage and adventure, peer or family influence, adherence to Isis ideology, naivety and romantic optimism, and the chance to be part of something new, exciting and illicit”.

    • 回复: @Flint Clint
  370. @Corvinus

    For one thing, perhaps someone saying Swedes have a swarthy complexion isn’t the most reliable?

    And yes, of course the adulterer / fornicator was wrong in his absurd assessment of Germans emigrating to the USA. Utterly.

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  371. Poco 说:
    @Corvinus

    “IF I said 1 billion, fine. But YOU added the other part about it being mostly non-white, which is a separate issue. Try your bait and switch to be less obvious next time.”

    Not IF. You said it. It could only be non-whites because that is what the discussion was about moron. Can’t keep up with your own shitposts. Because that’s all they are.

    “That is too many people and not good for the American Nation.”

    根据谁/谁?

    Typical of a shitposting moron to utterly disregard the problems the nation already has assimilating immigrants and the fact of limited resources.

    “I’m a middle class, married, white man with children who makes his own decisions about race and culture. I am decidedly a normie.”

    Nah, you’re not normal. Every survey of the American Nation decidedly comes out on the Nation favoring immigration restriction.

    “Third, you’re a proven liar.”

    再次,根据谁/谁?

    I stand corrected, you’re a proven shitposting, lying, moron.

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  372. Antwen 说:

    A doctor should not be allowed to perform sex changes. The people wanting sex change should be in a mental Hospital. All of these people are going to hell. One good thing about dying is there be none of these people in heaven, but the big plus is no blacks will be there.

    • 回复: @Commentator Mike
  373. Corvinus 说:
    @Poco

    “Not IF. You said it. It could only be non-whites because that is what the discussion was about moron. Can’t keep up with your own shitposts. Because that’s all they are.”

    Perhaps I did say it. Why don’t you offer the actual post? Regardless, IF I answered “1 billion”, it was to your specific question “What do you propose as an upper limit to the population of the US? billion?”. That number comes from whites AND non-whites, whether it be immigration or home grown births.

    “Typical of a shitposting moron to utterly disregard the problems the nation already has assimilating immigrants and the fact of limited resources.”

    That would be a strawman on your part. I have not directly or indirectly made a statement that shows my “disregard” to the nation’s problems.

    “Nah, you’re not normal. Every survey of the American Nation decidedly comes out on the Nation favoring immigration restriction.”

    Friend, I have made it clear on this fine website numerous times that I am also in favor of such a policy.

    “I stand corrected, you’re a proven shitposting, lying, moron.”

    You’re just projecting.

  374. Antwen 说:

    I want to have a race change. I want to be a nigger just long enough to get on welfare, government housing, food stamps and all the other shit these animals get free. Then switch back to a good ole white boy.

  375. Corvinus 说:
    @RadicalCenter

    “For one thing, perhaps someone saying Swedes have a swarthy complexion isn’t the most reliable?”

    Ben Franklin isn’t most reliable? You need to consider the context of the times.

    “Which leads me to add one Remark: That the Number of purely white People in the World is proportionably very small. All Africa is black or tawny. Asia chiefly tawny. America (exclusive of the new Comers) wholly so. And in Europe, the Spaniards, Italians, French, Russians and Swedes, are generally of what we call a swarthy Complexion; as are the Germans also, the Saxons only excepted, who with the English, make the principal Body of White People on the Face of the Earth. I could wish their Numbers were increased. And while we are, as I may call it, Scouring our Planet, by clearing America of Woods, and so making this Side of our Globe reflect a brighter Light to the Eyes of Inhabitants in Mars or Venus, why should we in the Sight of Superior Beings, darken its People? why increase the Sons of Africa, by Planting them in America, where we have so fair an Opportunity, by excluding all Blacks and Tawneys, of increasing the lovely White and Red? But perhaps I am partial to the Complexion of my Country, for such Kind of Partiality is natural to Mankind.”

    In other words, he was basing his observations about other European ethnicities as being darker compared to the English. Where we currently think of it meaning “dark-skinned”, it had a different negative connotation back then. Pejoratives tend to shift meaning. Those “Americans” of English descent had pale pinkish/pale white skin compared to reddish or yellowish red skin tone. He is indicating his preference for that type of hue. Furthermore, his notion that the Swedes, Germans, Russians, etc. were “swarthy” is probably due to comparisons to barbaric nomadic tribes, making them lesser than Remember, even the Irish who look virtually same as the English were seen as foreign, non white and different race. It seems at one point the English were the only “true white race”.

    Interestingly, John Quincy Adams once explained to a German nobleman that if Europeans were to immigrate, “they must cast off the European skin, never to resume it.”

    “And yes, of course the adulterer / fornicator was wrong in his absurd assessment of Germans emigrating to the USA. Utterly.”

    Not quite. Even Alt Right leader Vox Day opines ”The Italians and the Irish were the original problem. They could have, and should have, been handled like the Chinese were. But they laid the groundwork for the Jews, the Germans, and the Scandinavians, who made things even worse. And they paved the way for the Mexicans, the Africans, and the Muslims. At this point, the USA probably can’t get back to 1986, let alone 1965.” Interesting. Basically, a specific group of whites, in this case European, who were deemed undesirable, which then opened up the floodgates to other “alien” Europeans to invade our shores.

    So, how did Germans become “Americans”? Magic dirt?

  376. Corvinus 说:
    @Sick of Orcs

    “It’s going to be either Western patriarchy or mohammedan goat-triarchy.”

    LOL, it’s not going to be either. Listen, why don’t you actually do something about putting back into place this patriarchy rather than bloviate.

  377. Corvinus 说:
    @Dannyboy

    “Hey Corvie, you retarded little cuck, if you’re going to continue with your mental diarrhea/word salad (and we know you will) at least learn how to use the goddamn Blockquote feature.”

    LOL, still upset you realized you lack the requisite intellectual horsepower nor intestinal fortitude to defeat those massive hordes which have crashed through the gate.

    • 回复: @Dannyboy
  378. Dannyboy 说:
    @Corvinus

    You’re an amusing little troll Corvie. A near perfect specimen of a misguided Leftist ideologue, The perverted version of “Christianity” you spout is a nice touch as well.

    But seriously, do everyone a favor and try to master the Blockquote feature, dipshit.

  379. @Antwen

    A doctor should not be allowed to perform sex changes.

    You are right. These doctors are criminals – mutilators and abusers, torturers and experimenters in unnatural practices. But could a surgeon even refuse to do such operations these days? Can you refuse any services to these gays and trannies and not be labelled a criminal yourself and prosecuted and fined and jailed, even a doctor being forced to cater to their every whim? At least we others are supposed to keep our mouths shut so as not to hurt their feelings, and watch. Watch the lunacy unfold in front of our eyes and not say a word of protest, as that’s a crime too.

  380. @Corvinus

    “You are putting Heartiste on a pedestal, equating him to reveled religious figures–when the fact of the matter is he continues his debauchery. There is no reform on his part. He is no authority on marriage and children, as he has no skillset in these two areas.”

    科维纳斯。

    In western th0ught there is a classical distinction between ‘is’ (positive science) and ‘ought’ (normative science).

    Heartiste is stating how women ‘are’ – their tendencies, instincts, imperatives, incentives, motivations, attitudes and goals based on their biology and common psychology.

    Heartiste is stating the ‘is’.

    The ‘ought’ is a separate question.

    You are conflating the two.

    这样想吧。

    The core tenet of Christianity is the fallen world.

    Heartiste is teaching men the aspects of women which are fallen.

    It’s that simple. That isn’t a question of ‘morality’, it’s an evaluation of an empirical state.

    Consideration of how women ought to be, is the Christian question.

    You’ve revealed yourself. You said that men can decide what masculinity is – that is the core tenet of transgender theory. Anyone who thinks that absolutely isn’t a Christian.

    I wrote a paragraph stating why pedagogy (which heartiste provides) for men is important – because of a series of teratogens that harm development of testosterone and male psychology.

    You absolutely implied there is no link between testosterone and mail trait expression – and you absolutely doubled down by saying masculinity is whatever a man decides it is – which is the most anti-Christian statement I’ve seen in some time.

    You don’t understand the Christian distinction between is and ought and you are an adherent of transgender theory. Caitlin Jenner thinks he is feminine. You and him are totally aligned.

    It’s just ridiculous. This is why cuckservatives are poison. Your one job is to be professional dorks, and you fail at that, utterly. You’re completely incoherent and you have zero understanding of the basic premises of Christianity.

    ““If little boys are taught masculine behaviours like risk-taking, aggression and individualism are toxic”
    They are being taught those values today.”

    Okay, so pedagogy is important now.

    Are they being taught those behaviours en masse in the mainstream? No, otherwise concepts like toxic masculinity and white privilege and feminism would be minor. The micro is not the macro. Conservatives allowed those concepts. But credit where due – I’m glad to see that those courses exist.

    ““I’ve helped 3 guys get married to Christian women I’d have been minded to marry myself…”
    You are not putting Vox Day’s advice into practice–it’s not about you.”

    Now you’re engaging in a false attribution.

    I was demonstrating that Heartiste’s material is extremely useful in a Christian context. Because as I keep saying and you keep doltishly abjuring, the nature of women isn’t a moral question.

    “By being an elitist virtue signaler, assuming you took those men under your wing. And, yes, that is my opinion.”

    Lol what?! By assisting some Christian men with attraction according to you I was doing the opposite of virtue signalling. Don’t use phrases you don’t understand. If I was virtue signalling, I would have advised them to double down on unattractive cuck framing and advised empirically false political correctness and their wives would have left them because they weren’t attracted to them.

    加油

    And I wasn’t making it about me – I was using a personal example to demonstrate a general principle.

    Is comes before ought. If you don’t understand this, you don’t understand western philosophy, or even the hierarchy of sciences. I sincerely hope you aren’t in a position of activist leadership – and I unfortunately think you probably are.

    Women on average are attracted to Dark Triad traits. Whether or not that is moral or immoral is irrelevant to the fact that they are. Cucks flabulating that the tendency is immoral doesn’t mean it isn’t a tendency that exists.

    “Of course men do. It is their liberty to embrace manhood in a variety of ways–competitive, assertive, goal-orientated, independent, protective. We have agency. You just do not like how some men go their own way.”

    You’ve used a selection of masculine traits and said men can choose how to be masculine by choosing among them.

    But that’s not men choosing their own models of masculinity. A man who cuts his penis off and takes estradiol may believe that he is expressing masculinity, by simply defining his actions as brave, or risk-taking, or a version of his agency, or non-conformist, or independent, or goal-oriented, or protective. But he isn’t behaving in a masculine manner, and he isn’t masculine – in fact, he is the epitome of effeminacy. As I said – you are on the transgender theory spectrum because of your imprecision.

    There is an objective truth separate from the mind of the man in question that defines the limits of masculinity. I really hope you accept this – because that’s inherent to the natural law and Christianity.

    There is no difference between what you said and what the discord trannies on reddit showing their gaping dilation wounds say. You’re revealing why Christianity has become so debased. It’s probably because you’re a non-Catholic.

    “Your source is a study about a subset of women who were seduced by a cult due to a number of complex factors–“a rejection of Western feminism, online contact with recruiters who offer marriage and adventure, peer or family influence, adherence to Isis ideology, naivety and romantic optimism, and the chance to be part of something new, exciting and illicit”.

    Very selective.

    You just ignored the population statistics from Britain showing a ten year and decreasing doubling curve for Islamic conversions among British people.

    You’ll never change – but you also pretty casually dismiss the Jihadi brides. What difference does it make the techniques used by Muslims to obtain apostates from the West? You said there isn’t a move away from Christianity to Islam, and I gave you two instances of many showing that’s a lie.

    Talking to you has been quite revealing.

    “So, how did Germans become “Americans”? Magic dirt?”

    Germans met the standards of the 1790 Naturalisation Act that sought to increase the population of the colonies with white men of good character – because that’s who the constitution and the American Republic were for.

    You’ve engaged in purity spiralling, but you haven’t explained how one can become Chinese or Indian or Japanese by intoning, once, some principles inherent to their culture.

    Germans are not American, they are German. But they are western, because of their Christian, European, and Greco-Roman heritage – which even progressives who believe you can become a women by declaration admit.

    I just laugh at the purity shilling that pretend proximity and remoteness can’t apply within any given set of categories.

    Yes, there are national differences between different sub-groups of white people, but they are superseded by the similarities within the category of ‘western’.

    If the USA can’t be American, it can have the core of an American nation with subordinate and orbiting western nations.

    Civic Nationalism can always exist at the margins, subject to thresholds. Paul Krugman when gleefully masturbating over the end of white America has talked about ratios of immigrants required for immigrants to take democratic power by virtue of their franchise.

    Civic Nationalism is no longer a viable model for the West – and it’s just astounding to see how Conservatives bury their head in the sand.

    Anyway I’m going to leave it there. Any more and this starts getting Gamma. But your latest comments were very revealing about the quality of your thought and you as emblematic of the problems in the West.

    The unwinding of the fallacies in your ideas are going to be so extremely painful – and I just hope you remember this thread as events unfold.

    In Britain the NHS has now said anyone who they declare to be racist, sexist, or who make a malicious accusation about hospital malfeasance can be denied medical care.

    That’s your future cuckservative, unless you act now.

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  381. Corvinus 说:

    Cuckservative is an outdated term. It has observably lost its meaning. You keep referring to me in those terms, which is cute.

    Now, moving on. Simply put. Heartiste overstates women’s tendencies, instincts, imperatives, incentives, motivations, attitudes, and goals to suit his manospherist ends. He himself fell when he led a hedonistic lifestyle. Heartiste had every opportunity to renounce sin and seek God’s strength. Instead, he chose the path of self-indulgence. You are defending a man who, in Biblical times, would have been stoned to death for attempting to bed a virgin or bang a nubile woman who was yet to be betrothed. It’s that simple. It is a question of his immorality. “Consideration of how women ought to be, is the Christian question”, indeed, but NOT from Heartiste’s secularist perspective.

    “You said that men can decide what masculinity is – that is the core tenet of transgender theory.”

    LOL, no, it is not. Don’t be so overly dramatic.

    “You absolutely implied there is no link between testosterone and mail trait expression – and you absolutely doubled down by saying masculinity is whatever a man decides it is – which is the most anti-Christian statement I’ve seen in some time.”

    More strawmen on your part. Again, I stated that it is the liberty of men to embrace manhood in a variety of ways–competitive, assertive, goal-orientated, independent, protective. These four traits are the backbone of Christian masculinity, NOT transgender theory. How a man showcases those characteristics is his own decision, their agency.

    “You’re completely incoherent and you have zero understanding of the basic premises of Christianity.”

    I’m actually quite coherent and well-versed in Christianity. You, not so much. You’re false idol is Heartiste.

    ““If little boys are taught masculine behaviours like risk-taking, aggression and individualism are toxic”
    They are being taught those values today.”

    “Okay, so pedagogy is important now.”

    I never stated otherwise. You enjoy putting words into people’s mouths.

    “Are they being taught those behaviours en masse in the mainstream?”

    Yes, by fathers everyday.

    “I was demonstrating that Heartiste’s material is extremely useful in a Christian context. Because as I keep saying and you keep doltishly abjuring, the nature of women isn’t a moral question.”

    A Christian context imbues the moral question regarding the nature of women. Heartiste is not a Christian, nor is he moral. You are dangerously hypocritical here.

    “Women on average are attracted to Dark Triad traits. Whether or not that is moral or immoral is irrelevant to the fact that they are. Cucks flabulating that the tendency is immoral doesn’t mean it isn’t a tendency that exists.”

    Women are not attracted to narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy–impulsivity, selfishness, callousness, and remorselessness.

    “You’ve used a selection of masculine traits and said men can choose how to be masculine by choosing among them. But that’s not men choosing their own models of masculinity.”

    I focused on four core masculinity traits which are Christian in nature That is the model.

    “Germans met the standards of the 1790 Naturalisation Act that sought to increase the population of the colonies with white men of good character – because that’s who the constitution and the American Republic were for”

    Obviously not, as evident by the rise of nativists in the 1840’s and 1850;s, who insisted that this group and the Irish did not properly fit in.

    “Germans are not American, they are German.”

    If they arrived here as immigrants. But their children are American of German descent.

    “Yes, there are national differences between different sub-groups of white people, but they are superseded by the similarities within the category of ‘western’.”

    It’s a matter of Who/Whom. Obviously, the nativists did not view it in that fashion.

    “If the USA can’t be American, it can have the core of an American nation with subordinate and orbiting western nations.”

    The American nation is one that consists of western and non-western nations, of different races, nationalities, creeds, and religions. Hate facts, to be sure.

    “Civic Nationalism can always exist at the margins, subject to thresholds.”

    I note that you have yet to substantially address the Civic Nationalism components to my argument. Go back to the drawing board and carefully parse them out.

    “Anyway I’m going to leave it there. Any more and this starts getting Gamma.”

    On your part, assuredly.

    • 回复: @Dannyboy
  382. Dannyboy 说:
    @Corvinus

    Cuckservative is an outdated term. It has observably lost its meaning. You keep referring to me in those terms, which is cute.

    Actually it’s a very recent term, but in truth it doesn’t really do you and your ilk justice. You’re a Leftist shitbag. Period.

    Any “man” who would refer to himself as a “normie” has issues to begin with…lol

    But of course what is considered “normal” now is essentially very far Left.

    Men who are Traditionalist/ Nationalist instinctively understand this.

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  383. Corvinus 说:
    @Dannyboy

    “You’re a Leftist shitbag. Period.”

    LOL, you’re like any typical radical leftist, or SJW, or white nationalist, or Alt Right acolyte. Rather than engage in discourse, you resort to ad hominem.

    “Men who are Traditionalist/ Nationalist instinctively understand this.”

    That’s not you.

    • 回复: @R.G. Camara
  384. Miro23: “Technological civilization can coexist with an (artificially created) pre-modern lifestyle.”

    The peace between people who attempt to withdraw from technological civilization (or were never part of it) and that civilization itself is always an uneasy one. Technological civilization’s quest for additional resources is limitless, and any co-existence continues only so long as its dominating force will permit. People join it and remain part of it for the perceived benefits, but even if its attractions aren’t enough to draw outsiders in willingly, its rules and regulations inevitably tend to suck in and assimilate those who try to remain aloof from it. For instance, segregation on the basis of race can’t legally be practiced anywhere in the West, which poses a big problem for those who would establish a white nationalist state. Then there’s human nature to contend with. For example, recently I’ve read that even Amish girls are coming back from rumspringa with niglets. These are the formidable pressures of conformity, to which human beings are all too inclined to yield. No doubt that’s a large part of the reason why the lifestyle you suggest, though healthy, is followed by only a few.

  385. @Corvinus

    Poor Corvinus. Everyone’s seeing through this lefty’s poor performance, and he’s desperately trying to fling poo and cover up the little boy behind Mr. Brock’s curtain.

    Stop hyperventilating, little snowflake. Just get a new screen name.

    笑。

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  386. Dannyboy 说:

    Rather than engage in discourse, you resort to ad hominem

    Engaging in discourse with Leftist ideologues is a complete fucking waste of time and energy.

    The current political situation is a perfect example.

    The Left brooks no dissent from their perverted ideology. They prosecute those who dare to do so with a fervor that puts any “religious fundamentalist” to shame.

    Unfortunately, the only thing your kind understand is violence.

    And that’s just what you people are fixin’ to get….again.

    • 回复: @Corvinus
    , @Flint Clint
  387. @Alden

    化妆品,尤其是高端产品,现在是一个巨大的行业。如果说有什么不同的话,那就是女性化妆比以往任何时候都多。看看美容视频博主的受欢迎程度就知道了。

  388. Corvinus 说:
    @R.G. Camara

    R.G. Camera and Danny Boy are one in the same. Sock puppet galore. Both talk tough and add no value to the discussion.

  389. Corvinus 说:
    @Dannyboy

    “Engaging in discourse with Leftist ideologues is a complete fucking waste of time and energy.”

    Except I’m not a leftist ideologue. Again, it’s all you know–anyone who opposes you is automatically labeled. In that way, you don’t have to think.

    “Unfortunately, the only thing your kind understand is violence. And that’s just what you people are fixin’ to get….again.”

    If you were going to do something about it in that fashion, you would have done it by now. It’s pure bluster on your part.

  390. @Dannyboy

    Danny don’t worry about Corvinus.

    His claim about the ‘proposition nation’ rests on one sentence of a document that ignores the rest of the document and all related documents. We canvassed that, but he simply elided it.

    The United States is not a melting pot – that was the theme of a depraved play by a Jew called Israel Zangwill who never set foot in the United States.

    He has simply ignored Martin Van Creveld’s observation that immigration is a form of war, by spouting cliches and wishes. There isn’t a single example in all of history where mass movement of people’s hasn’t been accompanied by conflict, the United States is not different to Yugoslavia for example, except that the divides and differences are vastly larger.

    He says all people are capable of universalism, which shows that he understands nothing of any of the major religions, nor of voting patterns, or of the link between race and culture. So he is no different to the progressive academics who say that every human expression is due to environment alone – consistent with his statement about self-generated masculinity. He’s an adherent of the theory of self-identifying.

    He absolutely said men can choose what they think is masculine. Words have meaning. That is transgender theory. He calls observing that ‘dramatic’ because he doesn’t know the import of his own stupidity.

    His version of Christianity is that Christians allow the immigration of non-Christians until every Church in Europe is converted into a Mosque like the Hagia Sophia. It’s that simple. That isn’t Christian.

    He can’t answer that. Africa’s population is going to double, and 60million mainly Muslim Africans are expected to be resident in Italy by around 2060. What does Christianity say about that state of affairs? Does it say you allow the destruction of Christianity? Are those 60million Africans all going to convert to Christianity, and even if they did, what does the catechism and the Bible say about the importance of the preservation of the nations? The nations are perserved even in heaven, whereas families quite surprisingly are not.

    He cannot avoid that reality – if he adopts his submissive and false Christianity that ignores the strictures on immigration in places like the Catechism and in Martin Luther etc he condemns Christianity in the West to it’s state in the Middle-East.

    The Cuckservative label is apt, because it has so much explanatory power. He says it’s outdated when it’s gathering more and more congruence and force by the day. It’s pretty funny.

    He doesn’t know what virtue-signalling means, using it inappropriately.

    He doesn’t understand the difference between a nation and a state, referring to the power of the Congress to legislate naturalisation as if that has any relevance whatsoever to the American nation.

    He is completely incoherent – first he denies the existence of the genetic posterity, then he proceeds to accept it by trying to purity spiral about it’s implications for non anglo-American whites. That contention is answered by the use of superordinate classifications and notions of proximity and remoteness and pragmatism.

    The horrendous short-sightedness of previous generations of the ‘Corvinus-type’ who allowed successive rounds of immigration including from Europe doesn’t prohibit a pragmatic response to further immigration today.

    He can’t explain what happens to a proposition-American’s status if they decide they’re going to change the ‘proposition’. That’s happening en masse, as paper-Americans intone ‘not our values’, correctly, because they aren’t American.

    He says things like this:

    “Now, IF we assume the Founding Fathers intended the Constitution to be a limitation on the power of government, as to themselves and their posterity–defined as descendants in their own personal blood-lines–by intentionally excluding those other people from the protections of the Constitution, and by failing to make a different provision for their protection from government, THEN the Founding Fathers left them completely unprotected from government, granting the Founding Fathers even broader authority enjoyed by the British monarchy, which was restricted by the Magna Carta and the English Bill of Rights. In effect, the Founders and their blood-lines set themselves up as “nobility”, with unfettered rights, with all others designated as “peasants”, having no rights. The historical record clearly demonstrates that the Founding Fathers did NOT partake in such an endeavor.”

    Then says that the implications of the statement are putting words in his mouth.

    It’s such an incoherent and senseless word-dongle where nothing follows from what came prior it could mean anything.

    But it means what I said it means. This idiot is saying that excluding people from protection from government because they weren’t American granted the Founding Fathers ‘even broader authority enjoyed by the British monarchy’. Well a) no it didn’t, obviously and b) by that logic, excluding ‘anyone’ would have the same outcome.

    As I said, this idiot is saying that by excluding non-Americans from the protection of the American government, the founders were assuming powers greater then the royals. Well that’s what a distinct country is – it includes some people and excludes others.

    Not only that, the dingleberry is then saying having an exlusive nation set up the founders with “unfettered rights” – despite the fact they had just signed a constitution that constrainted those rights.

    Don’t worry about Corvinus, he’s just a moron.

    The constitution was for the genetic posterity of the Europeans in the United States at the time of the formation. It obviously wasn’t for the founders families only – because it was for the Europeans there at the time, who were primarily but not solely Anglo-American.

    And Corvinus’ entire screed is replete with nonsense paragraphs like that one.

    “Your source is a study about a subset of women who were seduced by a cult due to a number of complex factors–“a rejection of Western feminism, online contact with recruiters who offer marriage and adventure, peer or family influence, adherence to Isis ideology, naivety and romantic optimism, and the chance to be part of something new, exciting and illicit”.”

    No, the liar ignored that my other source was demographic data from Britain showing a doubling exponential curve with the doubling period reducing of British conversions to Islam.

    “I would surmise that you question the validity of today’s science similar to Vox…yet you link to studies that seemingly prove their assertions”.

    So no kind of empirical material is sufficient to change Corvinus’ self-generated ideas about the world.

    If 108 women rate a man’s attractiveness according to the magnitude of his psychopathy rating – that’s a pretty strong indicator of a correlation.

    But I guess if you decide it isn’t, then by all means, you are the source of all knowledge, solipsist.

    ““These young guys taught they every aspect of attractiveness is literally ‘toxic’ have to be rebuilt from the ground-up.”
    That’s not how it is.”

    So if guys being taught something has no impact, pedagogy doesn’t matter.

    你是一个白痴。

    Heartiste’s fornication doesn’t mean that his material about the nature of women is intrinsically immoral.

    Anymore then on the other article here by Lance Welton called ‘Are Women Destroying Academia” is immoral because it presents empirical facts about female behaviour that are negative.

    Don’t worry Dannyboy, this guy is an idiot, and his entire school of posturing is going to die, just like the Weekly Standard.

    As I said, he doesn’t understand the West, and he doesn’t understand Christianity, and he doesn’t understand America. It’s priceless.

    Lets see what he says next!

    • 同意: Dannyboy
  391. Backerout 说:
    @AaronB

    奴隶说道。

    让我想起艾因·兰德(Ayn Rand)的火车乘客,他们相信当他们驶向隧道时,他们可以适应任何系统,由燃煤机车牵引,该系统由一个重视派系(indentarian)权力而不是真相的系统提供。

  392. Sankara 说:

    The pseudo feminisation of occidental society appears to me as a urban phenomenon. In a city men and women are almost interchangeable, their activities being more or less alike and the concrete landscape of the city being sort of neutral. More than feminisation I would say indifferenciation, indistinction coming close to a human a-sexuality.
    This is very different in a rural surrounding: life in its diversity sours from everywhere, insects, trees, weeds, flowers, seasons, pollinisation,birth and death… The physical male strength is a precious asset , and so is the female fortitude and poise , both acting in necessary harmony.

    I say : pseudo feminisation, because women seem to seek for an hysterical masculinity and forget about their true values. This lie is going to make them tired and unhappy once they get what they want. I think in the end cities will collapse because of their monstrosity.

    • 回复: @Justvisiting
  393. @Prester John

    I like to call it ” the bonoboisation” primative indeed!

    When you leave out Yahwah you create a vacuum that all the demons with ism rush in.

    Denial, deciet and delusion is not a rockband but the mindset of the mammon worshipping world.

    Ignore the logos of the universe at your own peril.

    Fix yourself, repent, ask forgivness…

    赞美耶和华!

  394. @AaronB

    自由是内在的,而不是外在的。

    Similar to the the old health camp slogan, “Arbeit Macht Frei.”

  395. Twin Ruler 说:

    Feminist propaganda, vilifying Men, seems to work only on White Men. The Negro is usually as sexist and misogynist as ever. The Negro personifies Toxic Masculinity, as it is termed today. I wonder why? It is a good question to ponder.

    For, according to some sources, Negroes routinely abduct, rape, and even murder White women. What is their problem? I think, their problem is envy. For, the Negro is most envious due to the fact that White women are far more better looking than their own. Negro women are, of course, nothing to look at. Still, the Negro, no matter how badly he treats women, never has to fear rejection.

    For, after all, if a White Woman really were to reject a Negro for any reason, any reason at all, she might be termed (gasp) a Racist. She would dare not say how repulsive the Negro makes her feel for precisely that reason. Still, once in a relationship, with a Negro, there is no going out. They cannot escape.

  396. While your premise is correct in its overall view your analysis is the problem. You try to use anthropology and evolution to explain. The answers are in the bible. Greeks and Romans were known for male and male and female and female lifestyles. Those thi pngs only became curtailed in Europe because the biblical teachings started to penetrate that the sexes are supposed to be different and if they arent there would be confusion and all types of vial things. STD’s are not evolution. They are a result of misuse of creation of all sorts of promiscuity and degredations. Man was created in the image of God and woman was taken from man to be his help mate on the earth. Anything else brings confusion. Granted men did abuse their power but Satan has used this to cause western society to throw the baby out with the bathwater. In Asia now too – especially Japan and South Korea (and now creeping into China slowly) the attractive men in society now are the most feminine. Look at the advertisements there and look at K-pop and the like. Without biblical teachings these things will continue.

  397. @Sankara

    In a city men and women are almost interchangeable, their activities being more or less alike and the concrete landscape of the city being sort of neutral.

    That is why we have the great urban/rural divide in politics.

    Cities are true cargo cults. Stuff magically appears in the stores, modern conveniences are taken for granted, and nature is just a rumor.

  398. HammerJack 说:
    @Sam Coulton

    Either you are genuinely psychotic or you’re just doing a really good imitation of it.

当前评论者
说:

发表评论-对超过两周的文章发表评论,将在质量和语气上进行更严格的判断


 记得 我的信息为什么?
 电子邮件回复我的评论
$
提交的评论已被许可给 Unz评论 并可以由后者自行决定在其他地方重新发布
在翻译模式下禁用评论
通过RSS订阅此评论主题 通过RSS订阅所有Guillaume Durocher评论