Unz评论•另类媒体选择$
美国主流媒体大都排除了有趣,重要和有争议的观点
 博客浏览伊拉娜·默瑟(Ilana Mercer)档案
CNN排华专家无知:中国反动,回归儒家; 不是共产主义
通过电子邮件将此页面发送给其他人

 记住我的信息



=>

书签 全部切换总目录添加到图书馆从图书馆中删除 • B
显示评论下一个新评论下一个新回复了解更多
回复同意/不同意/等等 更多... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
同意不同意谢谢LOL轮唱
这些按钮可将您的公开协议,异议,感谢,LOL或巨魔与所选注释一起注册。 仅对最近使用“记住我的信息”复选框保存姓名和电子邮件的频繁评论者可用,并且在任何八个小时的时间内也只能使用三次。
忽略评论者 关注评论者
搜寻文字 区分大小写  确切的词  包括评论
列表 书签

法里德·扎卡里亚 (Fareed Zakaria) 是 CNN 连环剽窃者. 像另一个 CNN 罪犯一样, 在线手淫 杰弗里·托宾 (Jeffrey Toobin),扎卡里亚 (Zakaria) 被永远原谅并从文学炼狱中带回来,对不那么聪明的观众施加平庸、用户友好、新自由主义/新保守主义的治国方略和外交政策。

扎卡里亚最近播出了一个电视特别节目,“中国的铁拳。” 他称中国是“美国有史以来面临的最严峻的竞争”。 中国人正在做人工智能、生物技术、高铁——未来的产业。” 好像竞争是一种犯罪。

扎卡里亚还加入了其他新教派/新保守主义干预者的行列,指责中国人“在国内进行镇压”——他知道中国不是他的家吗?

正如扎卡里亚抱怨自由市场下滑,以及“在各个领域更坚定地坚持共产主义意识形态”一样,更不用说“在国外采取更激进的政策”了。 在扎卡里亚看来,对外侵略是美国的唯一特权。 奇怪的是,扎卡里亚没有提到中国在 COVID 灾难中的责任。 或者,中国对自然世界、动物及其栖息地的漠视和随之而来的掠夺和污染。

广播是熟悉的、傻瓜式的迪士尼化、天使与恶魔的外交政策故事情节。 也就是说,多元文化、民主的美国是自由和幸福的绿洲。 中国——实际上已经变成了相当中产阶级、物质主义、消费主义的社会——与这一切相反,不那么西方化; 不值得。 西方是最好的,这样的趋势是应该受到谴责的。 中国人是 92% 汉族 更像是他们民族主义的单一国家——这一事实与爱管闲事的心态无关。

美国外交政策精英的恐华症是对中国统治精英通常为国家利益行事这一事实的分散注意力; 而美国的统治等级的行为与其人民的福利相悖,以至于构成叛国罪。

《经济学人》的观察 比扎卡里亚更聪明,当然也更冷静:“中国领导人仍然希望从西方获得投资和技术,但他们认为西方正在衰落,正在与西方规范和思想脱钩。”

这一点需要提炼,因为,同时拒绝西方的堕落方向; 中国选择性地接受了西方的许多最高成就。 例如…

古典音乐

在放纵和宽容的父母和教育家的支持下,美国的年轻人变得越来越放荡、放荡和放荡。 大多数人在写作、推理和连贯地谈论除 raaaaaacism 以外的任何事情时都是无知和糟糕的。 他们也摆脱了他们最好的传统。 中国人——似乎知道什么是好的——正在回归古典、传统和永恒而普遍的美丽。

禁止 腐败的嘻哈文化,中国有了新的出口:西方古典音乐。 “曾经,古典音乐通常从西方传到其他地方,” 奇迹 经济学家。 “现在中国正在扭转这种交流,不仅在中国表演西方古典音乐,而且还出口它。”

口味是主观的,但标准是客观的.

立即订购

正确地归类为街头剧院,而不是音乐,说唱和嘻哈,客观地说,是阴沟文化,在技术和音调上当然没有任何音乐价值。 嘻哈歌手或说唱歌手的叫声和手势像发情的灵长类动物一样淫秽。 伴随无调性咕噜声的动作是对动物性行为的模拟,如果你愿意的话,是野性的呼唤。 这是令人反感的。 中国领导人不想要它有错吗?

此外,鉴于中国人一致寻求扭转共产主义文化大革命并恢复与共产主义对立的儒家思想,扎卡里亚关于中国正在回归共产主义的断言是肤浅的,甚至是愚蠢的。

当美国陷入沉闷、残酷的觉醒; 中国,有趣的是, 寻求精神寄托 在其古老而伟大的儒家传统中。

儒家思想起源于中国,被社会主义摧毁了——先生。 Zakaria 可能已经忘记了——来自西方。 与我们自己的叛徒阶级不同,中国的领导人知道什么能拯救灵魂,他们想用这种本土文化寄托给这个国家。

中国人不是多元文化的锅; 他们是一个真正拥有丰富古老文化的民族。 共享的、令人钦佩的遗产的美妙之处在于,国家可以在努力扭转外国文化大革命的同时收回它,因为它禁止儒家思想。 事实上,“中国父母热衷于更儒家的教育,” 确认 经济学家。

核心课程和西方经典课本几乎从美国学校中清除。 在中国,“学校教的经典课本从14本增加到72本”。 从此,中国的孩子将“学习 中国古典思想、文本和道德,尤其是与孔子有关的那些。”

所以,这是更令人兴奋和崇高的追求, 儒教或特许学校?

如你所见,扎卡里亚的 rah-rah America 超级麦芽酒 歇斯底里,反映在对中国的保守叙述中,比不完整更糟糕; 半途而废。

习近平

谁是这项提升人民的使命的幕后推手,而不是让他们陷入沉闷的后现代解构主义,美国 沃克拉蒂 使我们现在制度上激进的国家陷入困境? 除了习近平主席。 他“在提升儒家思想方面做得比任何其他现代领导人都多。”

没有了美国式的多元文化来阻碍民族精神,在所有穆斯林人口被无情控制以消除对大多数人口的最轻微恐怖主义威胁的情况下,中国人确实无法阻止。

1949年,“文化大革命”期间,毛泽东告诫中国人要砸旧东西。 Antifa,“红卫兵团伙涌入孔子故里曲阜,炸毁了孔子的坟墓。” 美国人已经到了那个时候。 他们正在清除他们的基本教义,并抹去对他们的精神父亲的纪念和纪念品。 到过那里; 做到了,中国人说。

伊拉娜·默瑟(Ilana Mercer) 一直在写每周一次的古自由主义者 思想片 自1999年以来。她是《 进食人族的锅:从种族隔离后的南非给美国的教训 (2011)& 特朗普革命:唐纳德的创造性破坏被解构”(2016 年 XNUMX 月)。 她在 推特, 瞎扯, YouTube & LinkedIn; 被禁止 Facebook, 并有一个 新的视频播客.

 
• 类别: 对外政策 •标签: 美国媒体, 中国, 中国/美国 
隐藏326条评论发表评论
忽略评论者...跟随Endorsed Only
修剪评论?
    []
  1. JBHoren 说:

    It is interesting that you note China’s love-affair with Western “classical” music; they embrace it, and view the accompanying Xtianity as historical context, rather than hysterical dogma.

    You mention “Gangs of Red Guards [that] swarmed Qufu, Confucius’s hometown, and blew up his tomb.” Not only “ Antifa” — as well, the PA/Hamas thugs who, with their own hands and the help of UNESCO, et-al, continue working to destroy Israel’s 3000 year-old Jewish heritage.

    Finally, isn’t it a fascinating geometry between Israel, the UAE, China, and the US, vis-à-vis the Abraham Accords?

  2. so you’re a paleocon, are you? who do you think you’re fooling? you’re an israel-first jewess who called Ron Unz’s friend John Mearsheimer an anti-semite because he wrote about the malign influence your lobby has on american foreign policy. you are the neocon, not fareed zacharia. it makes perfect realist sense for america to confront china, and your accusation of “sinophobia” is just as absurd as your accusations of “anti-semitism.”

    • 同意: Chris Mallory, Druid55
    • 哈哈: neutral
    • 巨魔: Biff
    • 回复: @Exile
    , @damallriversintibet
  3. mijj 说:

    > “repression at home”

    nothing more repressive than crime, poverty, homelessness, ill health – USA is winning at repression.

    • 同意: Bing Bong Trump
    • 谢谢: Emerging Majority
    • 回复: @Mulga Mumblebrain
  4. Did anyone else notice the Exceptional! injections?

    奇怪的是,扎卡里亚没有提到中国在 COVID 灾难中的责任。 或者,中国对自然世界、动物及其栖息地的漠视和随之而来的掠夺和污染。

    他们的所有穆斯林人口都受到无情的控制,以消除针对大多数人口的最轻微的恐怖主义威胁——确实无法阻止中国人。

    Even when calling out the likes of Fareed Zakaria, Ms. Mercer has amplified a couple of Uncle Sam’s talking points

    to inflict mediocre, user-friendly, neoliberal/neoconservative statecraft and foreign policy on viewers who’re none the wiser.

    About as dissident as Pat Buchanan.

    • 同意: Bro43rd, RedpilledAF
  5. Ace 说:
    @JBHoren

    我不知道巴勒斯坦权力机构/哈马斯正在摧毁的 10,000 年的犹太遗产。 我确实知道以色列国防军对待巴勒斯坦抗议者就像对待射击场中的鸭子一样。 谁不知道定居者向巴勒斯坦村庄倾倒污水,砍伐巴勒斯坦人的橄榄树,并推平他们的房屋? 我什至看过以色列国防军处决囚犯的视频。

    但你是对的。 那些巴勒斯坦权力机构/哈马斯穴居人。 不尊重犹太遗产!!

  6. neutral 说:

    it makes perfect realist sense for america to confront china

    No it doesn’t, the only reason China is being attacked is because ZOG wants no threat to their world domination. All other nonsense about human rights, losing jobs, viruses, etc, is just propaganda for the goyim to swallow.

    • 同意: Joe Levantine
  7. neutral 说:

    On the topic of clueless, replace US flag on that image above with the jewish one and then you will truly know what this is all about.

  8. obwandiyag 说:

    对不起,中国还是共产主义。

    为什么? 你问。

    因为政府拥有银行。

    案件结案。

  9. El Dato 说:

    “uber ales” should be “über alles”, otherwise it implies an excellent collection of beer.

    • 哈哈: ILANA Mercer, InnerCynic
  10. Biff 说:
    @obwandiyag

    对不起,中国还是共产主义。

    为什么? 你问。

    因为政府拥有银行。

    案件结案。

    对不起,美国仍然是法西斯主义者。

    为什么? 你问。

    因为银行拥有政府。

    案件结案。

    • 哈哈: Escher, GMC, Rogue
    • 巨魔: Chris Mallory
    • 回复: @animalogic
  11. 美国外交政策精英的恐华症是对中国统治精英通常为国家利益行事这一事实的分散注意力; 而美国的统治等级的行为与其人民的福利相悖,以至于构成叛国罪。

    当然! 中国并没有被混乱(((破坏者)))所引导,而是被迫将数十亿美元交给一个没有任何积极回报的外国实体。

    • 回复: @sally
  12. PJ London 说:
    @obwandiyag

    你是一个非常愚蠢的人。
    共产主义是国家拥有生产资料的地方。
    银行与生产无关。

    但是中国有一个中央银行(像所有中央银行一样颁发许可证并监管其他银行)
    它有 3 家“政府”银行提供保险——农业保险、进出口保险和海外发展保险。
    它有 6 家主要银行(如 JPM、花旗银行等)可以参与国债销售。
    拥有商业银行24家,是普通的商业银行和客户银行。
    它有数百家小型农村和地方银行。
    它有大约50家在中国经营的外资银行。

    您是否需要更多信息来表明您的评论有多愚蠢?
    “政府”不持有商业银行股份。

    • 同意: Sisifo
    • 谢谢: Biff
    • 回复: @Mulga Mumblebrain
    , @C Forest
  13. PJ London 说:

    问题是,即使是一个儒家语录,也没有万分之一的西方人能够提供。
    尽管这个人可能是有史以来最伟大的哲学家。
    他在政治和治理上的智慧是显而易见的,但它促进了伦理和道德的运用,这两者都是当前西方哲学的对立面。

    “ 如果您的计划是 1 年,请种植水稻。
    如果您的计划是 10 年,请植树。
    如果您的计划是 100 年,请教育孩子”

    美国按季度计划,我有一个老板认为“长期计划”是我们午饭后要做的事情。

    “一个国家的强大来自于家庭的完整。”
    “智慧、慈悲和勇气是人类公认的三种道德品质。”
    “当你为别人劳苦时,要像为自己一样热心。”
    “不要把你自己不想要的东西强加给别人。”

    习既是学者又是政治家

  14. Xcom 63 说:

    文化大革命通常发生在 1965-70 年,而不是 1949 年。应该修改

    • 同意: profnasty
    • 巨魔: Sarah
  15. SafeNow 说:

    I read that China has 300,000 people with an IQ over 160, and the U.S. has 10,000. I believe that in the U.S., such people become hedge-fund managers, whereas in China, they go into fields that help the country and its people. I think this is a big deal. (Are you reading this right now, smart Chinese-intel ladies? Hi. Have a good day.)

    • 回复: @Paul Greenwood
    , @profnasty
  16. reading 说:

    Ah! the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution?

    That’s the most thorough The most radical democracy People use guns, shells and fists instead of votes to publicize their ideas Among various groups, not only the high – ranking parliamentarians and ministers And the high priests of culture protested against stepping down They also use violence to show their democracy to each other This is a great democratic Jihad

    People need democracy Just like you need sunshine But not too close If someone, like crazy believers, talks about democracy all day and demands others Such people need to stay away

    • 回复: @nokangaroos
  17. 当他们重组中东的所有计划都惨败时,我不再关注那些白痴的新保守派。 他们在很长一段时间内推动的所有事情都是完全错误的,以至于我真的不明白为什么有人对这些白痴给予任何关注。

    • 回复: @Joe Levantine
  18. @JBHoren

    Ahh-a Judeofascist reality inverter. The acts of Zionazistan and its ‘archeologists’ to destroy evidence of the myriad other cultures that have occupied Palestine over the millennia, while creating ‘evidence’ of mythical Judaic heroes, are infamous. So this Zionazi liar simply inverts the truth, and projects Zionazi Evil on its victims. Despicable.

    • 同意: Joe Levantine
    • 回复: @Druid55
    , @Seraphim
    , @antibeast
  19. @Greta Handel

    Lies. China has NO ‘culpability’ in CoViD19. China is doing more to preserve its biological heritage than almost any country, with the world’s greatest reforestation efforts, biodiversity protection and the stated ambition to create an ‘ecological civilization’. And how very wicked to prevent jihadist terrorwism.

    • 回复: @Druid55
    , @Dam
  20. @JBHoren

    The first Chinese who were really in to classical music were those on Taiwan…
    But yes it is a real thing – especially as Chinese who studied at European universities returned to China. It is also true that there is a groundswell to teach children classical Chinese instruments and music also.

  21. @PJ London

    银行只生产货币,只是一个细节。

    • 回复: @Liosnagcat
  22. InnerCynic 说:
    @Greta Handel

    Pat always walks up to the edge, eloquently pontificates about said cliff, and then walks back. Rinse and repeat. I’ve lost count of how many times this has happened over the decades. Its gotten to the point I no longer care. You might as well say in the morning that the sky is blue and go back to bed.

    • 同意: profnasty
  23. Exile 说:
    @bombthe3gorgesdam

    Why does America need to “confront” China?

    • 同意: Mike Tre
    • 谢谢: Arthur MacBride
    • 回复: @frankie p
  24. 看门人的文章在他们被允许承认的内容方面令人着迷。

    • 同意: Sisifo
  25. @JBHoren

    Israel has existed illegally for exactly 73 years so where was all this jewish heritage? As for the Palestianians (the actual semites), they have been submitted to the worst atrocities curtesy of the joo scum usurpers and previous occupiers, the British.

    • 回复: @simple mind
  26. Druid55 说:
    @Mulga Mumblebrain

    这些犹太人的典型。 一直在投射。 这也是他们在政治上所做的。 指责你自己所做的每一个人!

    • 回复: @frankie p
  27. Reg Cæsar 说:

    Enabled by indulgent and permissive parents and pedagogues, America’s youth have become increasingly licentious, lippy and libertine. Most are ignorant and lousy at writing, reasoning, and conversing coherently about anything other than raaaaaacism.

    Well, if you’re going to throw anything at the “boomers”, it’s that everyone who has come after them is 💩.

    Properly categorized as street theatre, not music, rap and hip-hop are, objectively speaking, gutter culture, certainly without any musical merit, technically and tonally. The hip-hopster or rapper hoots and gestures obscenely like a primate [in] heat. The movements that accompany the atonal grunts are a simulation of animalistic sex, the call of the wild如果你愿意的话。

    Isn’t this pretty much what Ayn Rand said about rock ‘n’ roll? And not without reason.

    …the concerted quest among Chinese to reverse the Communist Cultural Revolution and reclaim Confucianism, which is antithetical to communism.

    I’ll believe this when all the pictures of the degenerate Mao have been removed and replaced with those of the emperors.

    President Xi Jinping… “has done more than any other modern leader to elevate Confucian ideas.”

  28. 这个作者好奇怪,好像睁眼了。 但是如果你仔细看,它们只是被涂上了。

    • 同意: RedpilledAF
  29. Reg Cæsar 说:
    @showmethereal

    The first Chinese who were really into classical music were those on Taiwan…

    Yo Yo Ma was born in Paris to a couple who had left China when the Nationalists were in charge. Yo Yo thus missed the yoyo of the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution. As well as the Parisian madness of 1968; the Mas were in America by then.

    • 回复: @showmethereal
  30. C Forest 说:
    @PJ London

    不。@obwandiyag 并不傻,也不是其他几十个访问该站点的人。 那个人是一个法西斯偏执狂,而且是个愚蠢的人。

    Like Fareed Zakaria, @obwandiyag will find fault with China because, says US state department policy staffer Kiron Skinner — a black Anglophile btw — is “non-Caucasian” and even though no Chinese, or China, has ever given the person offense or stolen anything from that bigot.

    像 Fareed 和 Skinner 一样,@obwandiyag 已经决定,因为华盛顿特区这么说,中国人是邪恶的,如果不被抹黑、欺负并因此被遏制,就必须被摧毁。 你看,理性遵循意志(尼采)。

    And, stupid, because to say that if the government owns the bank is equal to communism — that being a dirty word in America, and evil one, too — then what does that make of America where the banks (Goldman Sachs top the list), Fed specifically, owns the government?

    Next time, spare your education for the like of @obwandiyag. Why bother to educate them? Besides @obwandiyag’s fascist bigotry was not reasoned in and can’t be reasoned out.

    So useless, empty and nihilistic are the like of @obwandiyag that they find nothing else to do with their time other than to hog places like here which is, after all, next to cost free. @obwandiyag doesn’t know what else to do with life other than wait for death.

    • 哈哈: Cuffy
  31. @JBHoren

    Look how Xi had to live when his father fell from grace and was hounded by the Red Guard.

    Such a scarring experience either breaks someone or makes him resolute

    Putin’s brother died in the Siege of Leningrad – 900 days trapped in a dying city – burying the dead in the ice

    Then look at the Western politico-media types

    • 同意: showmethereal
    • 谢谢: GMC
  32. @PJ London

    美国计划以 Bennies 为例。 及时行乐。

  33. @showmethereal

    The tonal nature of Chinese language gives Chinese children an advantage in learning pitch.

    • 回复: @ntn
  34. @SafeNow

    I doubt they become hedge-fund managers. I suspect many become academics where they are ignored, underfunded, and their departments purged by ideological purists displaying very low IQ traits which parade on every platform in US Idiocracy

  35. 如果我们在美国和欧洲有合法的政府,中共就永远不会被认为是另一个犹太-可萨恐怖组织。

    权力金字塔

    [更多]

    谁统治着今天的“政府”?

    1 – 英格兰银行(1694 年至今) https://edu.bankofengland.co.uk/about/history

    2 – 罗斯柴尔德(1769 年至今) https://www.rothschildarchive.org/exhibitions/timeline

    3 – 盟约兄弟会(1843 年至今) https://www.bnaibrith.org/175th.html

    4 – WZO(1897 年至今) https://www.wzo.org.il

    5 – 联邦储备银行(1913 年至今) https://www.newyorkfed.org/aboutthefed/history_article.html

    6 – CFR(1921 年至今) https://www.cfr.org/book/continuing-inquiry

    7 - 中国共产党 (1921 年至今) http://english.www.gov.cn/19thcpccongress

    8 – 国际清算银行(1930 年至今) https://www.bis.org/about/history.htm

    9 – 世界银行集团(1944 年至今) https://www.worldbank.org/en/about/history

    10 – 联合国(1945 年至今) https://www.un.org/en/about-un

    11 - 伊斯兰国(1948 年至今) https://www.mossad.gov.il/eng/history/Pages/default.aspx

    12 – 北约(1949 年至今) https://www.nato.int/nato-welcome/index.html

    13 – 彼尔德伯格集团(1954 年至今) https://www.bilderbergmeetings.org/background/brief-history

    14 – 欧盟(1967 年至今) https://europarlamentti.info/en/European-union/history

    15 – 三边委员会(1973 年至今) https://trilateral.org/page/3/about-trilateral

    16 – 欧洲央行(1988 年至今) https://www.ecb.europa.eu/ecb/history/html/index.en.html

    • 回复: @Fart Blossom
    , @showmethereal
  36. 我尊重中国。 中共了解世界的运作方式并制定了计划。 类似于纳粹和 1000 年帝国。 唯一摆在他们面前的是人性……如果他们从内部崩溃,他们就完蛋了。 如果不是,他们将统治地球。 请记住,在盟友采取任何行动之前,第三帝国就从内部崩溃了。

    席兴平是个了不起的人。 中国有什么不喜欢的……没有宗教信仰(巨大的因素),令人敬畏的基础设施,而且没有这种多文化的同性恋胡说八道。 一个爱国党决定什么对国家有利,并用强硬的拳头统治。他们似乎唯一缺乏的领域是太空竞赛。 他们对火星和火箭感兴趣的那一天,我将完全皈依他们。

    奥斯瓦尔德·斯宾格勒在他的开创性著作《西方的衰落》中指出,民主将导致凯撒主义(仁慈的独裁者),而中国就是这样。

    西部度过了一段美好的时光。 几百年的权力和骄傲。 是时候合上书了。

    • 同意: GomezAdddams
    • 回复: @BlackFlag
    , @Realist
    , @Allan
  37. What nonsense this is. Check out the new book, “China is Communist, Dammit!” Most CP’s all over the world support the CCP and believe it is Communist. It is called Socialism with Chinese Characteristics” and we support it. This is the new Communism! This is what Communism is going to look like going forward. Keep in mind that words have no definitions. They mean whatever people who use them say they mean. If this is the new Communism – so be it! You like it? Fine! Maybe you are a new Communist too! The previous iterations of Communism are not coming back. All Communists now realize the need for a market and the need for material incentives and even competition, be it even between fellow public enterprises.

  38. animalogic 说:
    @Biff

    不要不同意银行拥有政府。 只是想知道(是的,我承认这是一个狡辩)“法西斯主义”是否是最好的描述。
    仍然认为寡头政治或富豪统治是更好的描述词(这并不是说美国没有很多——许多法西斯特征。)

    • 同意: Biff, Realist
    • 回复: @Fart Blossom
  39. Seraphim 说:
    @Mulga Mumblebrain

    Oh, please, don’t smear archaeologists, dragging them into the Islamo-fascist ‘Palestinian’ cult which all the leftovers of ‘Left’ have swallowed hook, line and sinker. You have no idea whatsoever of what these ‘Zionazi archeaologists’ have uncovered and made public.

    • 回复: @bike-anarkist
  40. Native to China, Confucianism was decimated by socialism, which—Mr. Zakaria may have forgotten—came out of the West

    Yes! THAT is why the propaganda industry of the West now hates China even MORE than when it was “communist”!!

  41. @reading

    The Crazies feedback loop is not “democracy” (a problem common to all revolutions though).
    – My old Latin teacher used to teach in China during the Cultural Revolution,
    and while he acknowledged some protection as a Westerner, his occasional
    stories were … 黑暗.
    It took China two full generations to recover, while in the Usual Suspects
    it is just gathering full swing.

    Better dress warmly 😀

  42. @PJ London

    您的 POV 是我在本门户网站上读到的最准确、最鼓舞人心的意见之一。
    谢谢!

    • 同意: Nancy
  43. antibeast 说:
    @Mulga Mumblebrain

    The Arabs are not indigenous to Palestine which was conquered by the Muslims after Islam was founded in the Arabian Peninsula in the 7th century. But Palestine already had several millennia of Judean, Egyptian, Assyrian, Persian, Greek, Roman and Byzantine culture and history prior to the arrival of the Arabs who were mostly desert nomads before their conversion to Islam.

    While the Arabs became the majority inhabitants of Palestine over the centuries, there have always been a small minority of Palestinian Jews living there until joined by the Ashkenazi and Mishrahim Jews who fled from Europe and the Middle East, respectively, during the last century.

    That whole region of the Levant became heavily Christianized prior to the Arab Conquest with Lebanon and Syria still retaining significant populations of Christians up to this day. While the Arab-Israeli conflict was ostensibly about the creation of a Palestinian State, the Arabs decided to start a war to destroy the State of Israel and rejected the UN Mandate which called for the creation of two States dividing Palestine equally amongst the Arabs and the Jews.

    That’s the fundamental problem of Arab tribalism which can not think beyond an ‘US vs THEM’ paradigm. They don’t know how to deal with people who are not like them which makes them prone to fanatical hatred of the ‘Other’ whether Jews or Christians, Sunnis or Shiites, Asians or Europeans.

  44. anonymous[204]• 免责声明 说:

    Hey, you wannabe-white judevil biotch!

    Why don’t you write an essay about… IsraHell is Apartheid, Returning to Nazism; Not Democracy!

  45. BlackFlag 说:
    @RJ Macready

    你为什么说第三帝国在盟军摧毁它之前从内部崩溃了?

  46. frankie p 说:
    @Druid55

    这叫做指责倒置,你是对的,犹太人是它的主人。

  47. Fareed Zakaria 是一个连环抄袭者,就像典型的印度骗子一样。

    印度骗子。 它已经变得如此普遍,以至于新名人正在通过诱骗这些印度骗子的骗局创造全新的职业。

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technical_support_scam#Scam_baiting

    他们欺骗和伤害我们这么多脆弱的老年人,并从我们国家窃取数十万/数百万美元。 他们不是我们/你的朋友,也不是一个友好的国家。

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technical_support_scam#Scams_from_India

    印度骗子认为我们/你是白痴

    https://www.quora.com/What-is-it-like-to-work-in-an-tech-support-scam-call-center/answers/115835390

    • 回复: @RJ Macready
    , @RJ Macready
  48. frankie p 说:
    @Exile

    美国需要对抗中国,因为真正的大犹太人,那些管理西方银行系统的人,正在寻找一种方法来进入中国金融体系的高层,而那些该死的中国人太聪明了,不允许寄生虫进入。中国人会允许西方银行开设一些商业银行,他们愿意让Ray Dalio等财富管理基金进入,帮助富裕和中上阶层的中国投资者增加财富; 毕竟中国没有发达的投资行业,他们会让Ray Dalio进来,迅速研究他的伎俩。 也就是说,中共将完全控制他们的中央银行和四大银行。 如果不控制货币供应,大犹太人就无法控制一个国家。

    美国不得不对抗中国的另一个原因是中共做对的事情太多了,就是为了中国人民的利益和利益。 他们让人们关注美国和欧洲政府在照顾本国人民方面所做的令人难以置信的糟糕工作。 西方制定和通过的政策和法律使企业、私人银行业和 1% 的人受益。

    • 同意: Bro43rd, GMC, Irish Savant
    • 谢谢: Nancy, Emerging Majority
    • 回复: @Anon
    , @Joe Levantine
  49. Jihadijew 说:

    Ron Unz 将她的文章放在前面,以此向这头来自南非的不知名犹太复国主义奶牛致敬。 现在将有一场对文章发表赞成/反对评论的竞赛。 前几天的同一篇文章只有几条评论。 但现在将进入倒计时。 不过也没什么不对。

    这是地穴犹太人的完美例子。 在移民、边境控制和 BLM 或种族问题上以美国白人的身份写作,而在谈到以色列时却没有解决这些问题。 为什么她提倡将种族和移民混合到欧洲/美国而不是以色列。 声称以色列是一个强大的民主国家。 是吗。

    她的拉比父亲仍然相信耶稣在地狱中燃烧。 听说他去年去世了。
    在 Holahox 的主题上,她和像她这样的“作者”总是回避简单的问题,比如伟大的 Eli Weisel 是如何在他的书中最终落入美国/盟国手中,而根据他的书,他在奥斯威辛(被苏联解放)。 他是如何逃脱的,以及他是如何抹去纹身的。 他可以通过向所有因拼错单词而不幸的 Bubbas 推广这种擦除技术来赚取数百万美元。

    还有一件事情。 奥斯威辛集中营于 1945 年 XNUMX 月解放,那是克拉科夫、卡托维兹和邻近地区下雪的月份。 在所有展示解放的图片/电影中,没有一片雪花。
    我们是否应该感谢阿尔弗雷德希区柯克和比利怀尔德出色的工作和指导/编辑。

    Arthur R. Butz 的世纪恶作剧。 这本书很难买到。

    • 回复: @sarz
  50. @BlackFlag

    我相信是这样。 我的意思是,战前纳粹高层之间存在信任问题。 Albert Speers 的书非常值得一读。 到战争结束时,纳粹官员更关心谁将接替希特勒鲍曼、希姆莱或那个我记不起名字的那个胖子。

    • 回复: @Rabbino
    , @Magnus
  51. Mike Tre 说:
    @PJ London

    “The problem is that not one in ten thousand westerners can provide even a single Confucian quotation.”

    So the West should embrace oriental philosophy instead of occidental? Is it a problem if 1 in 100,000 Chinese can’t provide a single quote by Plato?

    How about this: The real problem is the West has lost its ability to refer to its own great historical philosophers and innovators for guidance. And suggesting the West embrace eastern cultural icons is just as bad as the West’s current embrace of semitic degeneracy.

    • 回复: @Realist
  52. MLK 说:

    A sure sign of a Sad Story is when, across the political and ideological spectrum, those who are at each other’s throats conspire on memory-holing how we got to the current state of affairs. That isn’t any longer the half of it as we’ve moved from Scarlett O’Hara’s “I can’t think about that now,” to the toddler’s “I meant to do that!”

    If you can’t get the broad brushstrokes right . . .

    Let’s simplify. As the post-Cold War period began, and until Trump came down the escalator, the US ruling and governing classes, unified in hiding their monumental malefactions. Their “Everyone agrees!” reached its apex in “Trump Must Go!” for reasons I shouldn’t have to belabor.

    Suffice it to say, everyone seems to have forgotten the collapse of the Soviet Union and its Warsaw Pact because it just makes anybody who is anyone feel bad about presiding over the US’s “Unipolar Moment.”

    Could this author or any of the commenters, even with ill-intentions toward the American Project so quickly and thoroughly f**ked up that geopolitical free lunch?

    We can argue about who gets credit for the collapse of the Soviet Union. But, hands down, the USG was responsible for making the national humiliation period that followed a mere decade, rather than China’s “Century of Humiliation,” by installing but most especially reinstalling Yeltsin.

    Feeling ambitious, they’ve dedicated ever more effort to driving Russia into an ever deeper Strategic Alliance with China.

    I could go on but you get the broad strokes. Face it, Western elites are decadent and tired. They want rise China to take the global lead. All they ask in return is that they get to lord it over the rest of us in perpetuity.

  53. Rabbino 说:
    @RJ Macready

    Speer’s book was written under heavy pressure, you should take what’s there with a heavy grain of salt.
    另外,你提到的一切都是在盟军做了一些事情之后。

    • 回复: @RJ Macready
    , @Rogue
  54. Anonymous[396]• 免责声明 说:
    @JBHoren

    Why is this troll different from all other trolls? There is no troll like a Jewish troll.

  55. Anonymous[396]• 免责声明 说:
    @PJ London

    I think “Sense of Place” is a Confucian quote. Although where that gets you, I don’t know.

  56. @Rabbino

    是的,但你不能否认它们也是从内部爆炸的。

  57. @Dilbert Scott Adams the Cognitive Dissonance

    信不信由你,当这篇文章(我在下面链接)发表在印度时代时,所有印度人的最高评论都在赞扬这些动物。 他们都异口同声:……好吧,英国人统治了我们。 他们应得的,甚至更糟。 西方没有意识到印度人是最坏的……也许比穆斯林更糟。 至少穆斯林有能力先发制人。 印度人是被动的好斗的、部落的、自恋的,并且充满了人类所有最糟糕的特征。 这就是其中的 1.4 亿个。 他们从内部憎恨每一个白人,并希望加拿大、美国、澳大利亚,尤其是英国死亡。 我听说这里的祖母希望白人家庭死亡。 但是伟大的西方机器是通过桶装进口它们的。 在主流印度人被认为是少数移民......富有和成功。 没有人知道下面隐藏着什么
    他们将仅凭人数的绝对力量统治世界。

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8066227/amp/Vigilante-hacks-Indian-criminal-call-centres-CCTV-fraudsters-laughing.html

  58. @Jon Chance

    …the CCP would never have been recognized as anything more than another Judeo-Khazarian terrorist organization.

    太对了。

    Now I’m sure I don’t know .001% of the story, but most Americans should be shocked at some pertinent Chinese history.

    这是一张应该说很多的图片,但是即使在那张图片上,也只能代表冰山一角的微小冰晶。

    Caption: Mao in a high-level meeting with several “advisers,” Frank Coe, Israel Epstein, Elsie Fairfax-Cholmely, and Solomon Adler. Coe was one partly responsible for the Great Leap Forward and the famine which killed forty million people.

    Mao was a yali.

    I’ve only skimmed this article, but it seems interesting and fairly decent.

    https://www.sgtreport.com/2021/06/mao-was-a-yale-man-crafted-by-the-new-world-order-elites-a-yali-with-skull-and-bones/

    • 谢谢: Agent76
    • 回复: @Agent76
    , @Jon Chance
  59. Magnus 说:
    @RJ Macready

    Speer wrote all of his books to kiss allied butt. Any information from his books is best disregarded due to the fact he was very busy trying to be a good little boy for (((them))). Don’t base your opinions off Speer.

  60. Anon[219]• 免责声明 说:
    @frankie p

    为什么犹太人想闯入中国相对较小、正在崩溃的金融体系?

    • 回复: @Mefobills
    , @Badger Down
  61. @animalogic

    仍然认为寡头政治或富豪统治是更好的描述词(这并不是说美国没有很多——许多法西斯特征。)

    同意,但盗贼统治更准确。 也许更好的是 pervertokleptolutocracy。

    Stalin’s USSR had many fascist traits, and the US has long been Communist with fascist traits (as you’ve so accurately noted). Evidence for the claim can be found by examining Marx’s “planks” of the Commie Manifesto and it’s easy to see that all 10 apply to the US government either completely or almost so.

    话虽如此,“法西斯主义”这个词已经被用在很多方面,而且往往只是共产党人用来诋毁他们的对手。 因此,它与头脑简单一样毫无意义。

    • 回复: @animalogic
  62. @bombthe3gorgesdam

    You small head curly the chinese must live in all kala brains, get over 1962 indians started it by encroaching into tibet you were warned before chinese attacked you like they did another small head curly mcarthur in north korea

    • 哈哈: bombthe3gorgesdam
  63. Miss Mercer, China can either industrialize or cherish the natural world and stay trapped in un-development and make you happy. And China doesn’t give a fuck how you feel.

    Also, how come Fred Reed only publishes on your blog now?

  64. Mulegino1 说:

    The incorporation of classical music into the Chinese cultural mainstream is indicative of the fact that China has a vigorous and sustainable culture with the power of positive and constructive assimilation of all the best elements of world civilization. This, along with the rehabilitation of Confucianism- with all its constructive and stabilizing societal effects- is conducive to the organic health and flourishing of their society and sovereign nation state with its economy based upon the physical production of wealth, not predatory finance capitalism.

    In America, by contrast, our neoliberal cosmpolitan overlords have brought about the absolute opposite situation- the importation and cultivation of the absolute worst, ugliest and most socially destructive elements imaginable, i.e., rap, “melanomania”, radical feminism, the rites of sodomy, transgenderism and transhumanism, coupled with absolute contempt for our traditional Christian spirituality and limitless state sponsored usury. This is a monstrous syncretism, which can only lead to the collapse and death of the society.

    • 同意: Mefobills, CelestiaQuesta
  65. Realist 说:
    @RJ Macready

    The Chinese are strong believers in meritocracy…that alone will give them dominance.

  66. Realist 说:
    @Mike Tre

    Is it a problem if 1 in 100,000 Chinese can’t provide a single quote by Plato?

    Is it a problem if 1 in 1,000,000 Westerners can’t provide a single quote by Plato?

    菲菲

    • 回复: @Mike Tre
  67. @JBHoren

    you never miss an opportunity to plug Zionism.

    • 回复: @JBHoren
  68. China is moving into Confusionism than Confucianism.

  69. Mike Tre 说:
    @Realist

    I’m perfectly willing to admit that it is. It doesn’t mean we should be instead learning to worship the Chinese.

    • 回复: @Realist
    , @Joe Wong
  70. Bookish1 说:
    @BlackFlag

    它并没有从内部崩溃,而是从外部被嫉妒和仇恨所吞噬的力量所摧毁。

  71. Anonymous[917]• 免责声明 说:

    Why is it that the MSM media hire incompetent people? I mean incompetent at reporting on the real world. The answer is that they are in the business of pushing propaganda. They don’t want journalists. Fiction writers are welcome. It’s just a show anyway.

  72. anon[238]• 免责声明 说:

    Having banned corrupt hip-hop culture, China has a new export: Western classical music. “Once, classical music generally travelled from the West to the rest,” marvels the Economist. “Now China is reversing the exchange, not merely performing Western classical music in China, but exporting it.”

    Taste is subjective, but standards are objective.

    Properly categorized as street theatre, not music, rap and hip-hop are, objectively speaking, gutter culture, certainly without any musical merit, technically and tonally. The hip-hopster or rapper hoots and gestures obscenely like a primate on heat. The movements that accompany the atonal grunts are a simulation of animalistic sex, the call of the wild, if you will. It’s repulsive. Are Chinese leaders wrong to want none of it

    Banned hip-hop culture? Since when?

    • 回复: @bike-anarkist
  73. Agent76 说:

    16年2021月XNUMX日中美虚拟峰会。 习称拜登为“老朋友”

    Nov 17 2021 China’s Leader Rewrites History for More Power

    In this episode of we look at how to CCP rewrites or brushes over events like the Great Leap Forward, the Cultural Revolution and the Tiananmen Square Massacre; what this means for the future of the CCP; and how this sets the tone for the direction of the party.

    • 巨魔: showmethereal
    • 回复: @Mulga Mumblebrain
  74. @obwandiyag

    1933 年,德国政府接管了私营中央银行和许多较小的私人银行。 恶性通货膨胀政策立即终止。 从经济贫困的德国人那里购买资源也是如此。 因此,随着银行和货币创造的恢复,经济开始迅速恢复健康。

    因为德国的私人中央银行和货币控制计划是 Moneymonger\$ 接管欧洲大陆的核心; 整个 Uber-Jewish 控制机制尖叫、叫喊、呻吟,然后采取行动。 接下来你知道,从曼哈顿的主要百货公司开始,然后蔓延到中央银行统治的西部; 对所有德国商品的抵制就像一吨砖头一样。 报纸著名地报道说,有组织的犹太人正在与国家社会主义德国交战。

    从那里开始……当德国政府从犹太叛乱者耶稣那里得到提示并将放债人赶出他们的圣殿时,第二次世界大战的凡尔赛后触发器就发生了。

  75. Agent76 说:
    @Fart Blossom

    Thanks for your share Blossom, and I share this with those who do not know Chinese history.

    6 年 2018 月 XNUMX 日毛泽东的大饥荒大跃进

    当毛泽东在 1958 年宣布中国的第二个五年计划“大跃进”时,它承诺了一个基于农业财产和生产集体化以及日常公民生产钢铁的工业化的共产主义乌托邦。

    • 谢谢: Fart Blossom
  76. @antibeast

    Antibee is confused. A Johns Hopkins study of the DNA of Palestinians revealed that 80+% of them are descended directly from the ancient Hebrews. The desert Arabs only made up a smallish proportion of the Palestinian peoples.

    That said, I do realize that like the other two Mosaic Monotheist religions, Muslims have their problems. Firstly, as a primarily Norwegian-American—and I emphasize both nationalities–that means there is no way that I will SUBMIT to any goddamn religious dogmas. Submission is the meaning of the very word “Islam”. Submit to Yahweh, the tribal Wargod of the ancient Hebrews or to Allah, the reformulation of Yahweh composed by Mohammed? Fuggidaboudit!!! No way, Jose.

    It’s quite likely that some of my ancestors were Vikings. You see any submission there? The current head of NATO, Jens Stoltenberg, happens to have been born in Norway. Perhaps the Norse genome has faded a bit. Stoltenberg is nothing more than a boot-kissing, ass-licking toadie for the Globalist Agenda. Perhaps Norway has grown too wealthy. Politically, that land is as messed-up as the rest of the Central Bank\$ter dominated West.

    The UN mandate over Palestine was pure bullshit. It was the product of Bank\$ter control over Western governments. The very UN building in Manhattan was a “gift” of the Rottenfeller Crime Clan.

    What should have happened for all those Jewish Displaced Persons after World War Two, would have been for Australia’s Governor General, who forwards the Quean’s orders to her subjects, to declare a nice hunk of the northwest corner of that smallest continent (hardly a soul living there) to be the new location where Jews who couldn’t live with other people peacefully, to relocate to a scene where they could make the desert bloom.

  77. You could tell in the eighties that whites were doomed after being fed idolization and indoctrination of Magik Negro hoodrats.
    Y’all whites owes us reparations fo slavery hunnit an fitty yees ago.

  78. Mefobills 说:
    @Anon

    为什么犹太人想闯入中国相对较小、正在崩溃的金融体系?

    中国完全控制着他们的金融体系,该体系正在增长,而不是崩溃。

    antibeast 解释得比我好:

    _______________________________

    https://www.unz.com/mhudson/soros-and-china-the-vocabulary-of-neoliberal-diplomacy-in-todays-new-cold-war/#comment-4908949

    我忘记提及的另一件事是,中国于 1 年 2020 月 XNUMX 日通过了《外商投资法》(FIL),通过废除旧的外商独资企业(WOFE)外商投资法,给予外商投资企业“国民”待遇。 )、中外合资企业 (CFJV) 和外商投资企业 (FIE)。 在此新法之前,旧法限制外国投资者只能参与上述三类外商投资企业,禁止他们投资国内企业或在中国当地股票市场筹集资金。 这一限制迫使大多数中国互联网/电子商务公司将其控股公司注册在离岸司法管辖区,在那里他们可以自由地在中国境外筹集资金,因为他们的风投支持者通常是红杉等外国公司,他们现在可以在中国境内自由筹集资金,新 FIL 明确允许。

    与西方的流行观点相反,中国实际上是在放开资本市场,允许红杉、黑石和高盛等外国公司利用在中国境内筹集的人民币资金在中国资本市场“玩”金钱游戏,但须遵守中国政府的司法权。 中国互联网/电子商务初创公司在中国境外筹集美元资金,然后通过在美国政府的司法授权下在美国证券交易所进行首次公开​​募股将其离岸 VIE 股票上市的好日子现在已经结束。

    以下是 2017 年中国 VC/PE 募集的人民币基金与美元基金的相对份额图表:

    如上图所示,人民币基金在中国的VC/PE行业早已超越美元基金。 新的外商投资法现在允许红杉、黑石和高盛等外国公司通过从中国投资者那里筹集人民币资金进入中国资本市场。

    他们不再在华尔街,而是在中国街。

    • 谢谢: John Regan
    • 回复: @Paintersforms
  79. Anon[270]• 免责声明 说:

    儒教或特许学校

    有什么不同?

  80. @Fart Blossom

    Thank you for the interesting details on Skull & Bones in Red China.

    Although I’ve been aware since the 1990s that exporting American industries to Red China was a terrible idea for the US economy, I was naive until recently about the degree of brutality and totalitarianism in Red China and entirely unaware of the Jews’ role in establishing the CCP.

    Since Sun Yat-sen was a Georgist, it’s entirely predictable that Jews and “bankers” (counterfeiters) would create and support the CCP, socialism, and global “free trade” protocols.

    Taiwan and other Asian nations, on the other hand, pursued the course of American Libertarianism:

    [更多]

    15. Taiwan, 1940s

    Old Formosa was mired in poverty and fast breeding. Hunger afflicted the majority of people who were landless peasants. Less than 20 families monopolized the entire island. Then the Nationalist Army, led by Chiang Kai-shek, retreated to Taiwan. General Chiang figured he lost mainland China in part by not reforming land-holding. Chiang did not want to risk losing his last refuge – east of that isle lay nothing but open ocean. (Although Taiwan did receive a billion dollars from the US, it was mostly military aid, spread out over eight years.)

    A follower of Sun Yat-sen, the father of modern China and an adherent of Henry George, Chiang knew of the Single Tax. Borrowing a page from George via Sun, the new Nationalist Government of Taiwan instituted its “land to the tiller program” which taxed farmland according to its value. Soon the large plantation owners found themselves paying out about as much in taxes as they were getting back as Rent. Being a middleman was no longer worth the bother, so they sold off their excess to farmers at prices the peasants could afford.

    Working their own land with newly marketed fertilizers, new owners worked harder. They produced more, and after years of paying taxes to cover the onerous public debt, at last kept more and lived better. From 1950 to 1970 population growth dropped 40%, and hunger was ended. (William Rich, Overseas Development Council, Communique #16, 1972 April.) Taiwan began to set world records with growth rates of 10% per annum in their GDP and 20% in their industry. (Fred Harrison, The Power in the Land, 1983.)

    https://www.progress.org/articles/where-a-tax-reform-has-worked

    • 谢谢: simple mind, Fart Blossom
    • 回复: @Mefobills
  81. I agree with the general thrust of this article, but it comes off a bit too pro-Chinese.

    Basically, western neo-cons and pseudo-nationalists are too concerned with what China does in China, and want to punish China for things that aren’t really any threat to the average westerner. Western nationalists are concerned with what China does outside China (and whether or not it cooperates with the West when dangerous new plagues emerge from China).

    Keeping high end western technology in the West is a valid concern. Limiting the Asian takeover of western colleges, real estate, and infrastructure is a nationalist concern. Voicing disapproval of Chinese intimidation of moderate nationalist Taiwan is arguably a western nationalist concern (though probably not worth getting into a World War about). Getting to bottom of the Wuhan virus is also a concern for everyone outside China.

    In addition to the fake nationalists, who are more concerned with Chinese minority rights that protecting their own countries, there is also a bunch of extreme, conspiratorial “white nationalists” who think everything China does is great, and everything the West does is bad. They even dismiss western scientists for coming up with high tech vaccines to deal with a virus that is killing a lot of white people. This isn’t nationalism, it’s a form of snobbish self-hatred – an eccentric far right-wing version of left-wing anti-white, anti-western thinking.

    • 谢谢: simple mind
    • 回复: @Pancho
  82. @Reg Cæsar

    Ok.. But I was referring to the ones who were not living in the west but living locally. The article is referring to musicians living in China… So my point was the ones in Taiwan really started that trend… But it is also true they are teaching children Chinese classical instruments on the Mainland a lot now. On Taiwan there is an orchestra based on Chinese instruments. Examples of both in Taiwan and the mainland (though performing in Russia). But it was Taiwan where they first started in recent decades….

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGk5tXLR0Ps

  83. @Seraphim

    The archaeologists had their “outcomes” pre-determined… or else.

    They have beat this animal to death, and yet keep trying. The Pals and Hez will help determine their final legacy.

  84. @mijj

    另一个区别是中国人说真话——这是一种千百年来珍视的美德。相比之下,在西方,在公共生活、MSM 和商业中撒谎不仅无处不在,而且是强制性的。西方由邪恶的精神病患者控制和控制,而中国则不是。

    • 同意: frankie p
  85. @Agent76

    Keep on masturbating, racist, but when you wake from your onanistic delirium China will still be the largest economy on Earth, still flourishing and the USA will still be a rotten sewer of failed ‘Dominance’.

  86. @anon

    The detritus that end up at the bottom of class discrimination have every right to produce art, whether the flotsam at the top like it or not.

    All art from the “West” is commodified from the outset, hence how many artists go independent.

    I would say that the advent of Chinese ‘Rap” is CIA manufacture!!

    • 同意: Fart Blossom
  87. @Emerging Majority

    Perhaps the Norse genome has faded a bit. Stoltenberg is nothing more than a boot-kissing, ass-licking toadie for the Globalist Agenda. Perhaps Norway has grown too wealthy. Politically, that land is as messed-up as the rest of the Central Bank\$ter dominated West.

    I would suspect an inordinate range of extortive measures have been explicitly expressed by NATO/U\$A/Israel upon Norwegian politicos. I say that because I am from Canada, and Canadian Sovereignty has been removed from the public discourse.

    • 回复: @Emerging Majority
  88. @antibeast

    Oh, dear-and Jews are not ‘tribal’ and can think beyond an ‘US vs THEM paradigm’ can they?Hypocrite racist. The us vs them, the xenophobia and misanthropy psychology has its roots in Judaism, where it remains strongest, having been honed over 3500 years. I despise and fear any xenophobic thug, whether Judaic, Christian, Islamic or ‘Exceptional’.

    • 回复: @antibeast
  89. @Emerging Majority

    ….the post-Versailles trigger for World War Two occurred when the government of Germany took a cue from the Jewish rebel, Jesus, and drove the Moneylenders out of their temple.

    这是我读完你的第一段后的确切想法! 做得好。

    We’re told that Jesus preached, “Love thy neighbor.” It’s good to know that he advocated tough love such as taking a switch to the troublemakers. I would’ve cheered if he also planted a sandal in the posteriors of a few at the same time!

    祝福他!

  90. @Jon Chance

    你看印度新闻然后想谈谈什么是合法的?

    • 同意: RJ Macready
  91. Tesako 说:

    Eric X. Li: A tale of two political systems

  92. 你用你对说唱“音乐”的描述把它钉在了 Ilana 上。

    • 哈哈: ILANA Mercer
    • 回复: @Fart Blossom
  93. @bike-anarkist

    In former years, in part to not be saddled with advertising and political propaganda memes, I became an evening habitué of CBC Radio, listening to the likes of Peter Gzoski and Allen Maitland. Recall well in the late summer of ’74 when I drove a couple hundred miles downstream through the Agassiz Basin and hit the Manitoba border, where I immediately got laden with glossy brochures of most everything I could do in the “Peg” as well as maps and other helpful tourist-bait.

    Cruising down Portage in my 68 Ford, which I called the “Stormovik”, I noted sitting on a bench a young man who reminded me of the Scots tunesmith, Donovan. So,pulling over and introducing myself, it soon was established that he too was new in town, hailing as he did from Pictou County, Nova Scotia. So we buzzed around the city till near dark, catching a meal in the teensy Chinatown, parked the car and walked back on Portage, a few blocks west of Main. A basement bar looked to be interesting as neither of us had experienced one previously.

    Interesting wasn’t fully descriptive. Strip club and the dancer hadn’t a stitch, but was “comforting” herself with an ostrich plume. Looked up at the near-ceiling mounted teevee set and there was Richard Nixon, teary-eyed as he resigned the presidency. Poor guy must have not correctly read–or followed his orders. The stripper and the resigning president made for an ironic juxtaposition of images which would be hard to duplicate.

    Next day we drove a few miles up to Birds Hill Park to take in a free concert. It happened to be the first ever Winnipeg Folk Festival. Gordon Lightfoot headed up the bill. And who could forget the combo of Cathy Fink and Duck Donald. Most of the rest of the names have faded from memory, but the whole occasion of a trip northwards to the “Peg” was certainly memorable.

    Nowadays, I cannot even contemplating crossing the border, even into Manitoba as against nearby Ontario. Place has been transformed into Canuckistan. Covid mandates not quite as crazy as those the Aussies hafta face. From the look of things, Ontario has become downright fascistic in its lockdowns and even covid-camps in Metis areas. And the passport bullshit…both sides of the border are taking their orders from the NWO globalists. On this side, we merely need to damn our prostiticians in the Di\$trict of Corruption. You guys can focus your negative thoughts on the Governor General, taking his orders from the Bloody Quean.

    As bikes go, a feller I know, some years back upon high school graduation, rode his bike from Kalamazoo, Michigan, clear up to Alaska. It was maybe 20 years ago, so probably no passport was necessary at that time. A cartoonist and a characturist, he considers himself an “anarkist”…so there you go. Circle is complete.

  94. Looking forward to the day when opinion makers talk about how ‘the West’ isn’t Western. No point getting too engaged with this foreign nonsense.

  95. profnasty 说:
    @SafeNow

    I doubt Chinee are much more intelligent than legacy (White) Americans.
    These numbers seem way off.
    US has metastasized cultural cancer. But 300 to 10? I doubt that.

    • 回复: @Stones
  96. @Mefobills

    听起来他们的举动会削弱他们的控制权。 我相信他们会小心的,但金钱是最重要的。 危险的。

  97. mcohen 说:

    我第一次接触中国文化是在约翰内斯堡市中心约翰沃尔斯特广场警察总部附近的一家很棒的小中国餐馆。
    二是台湾的廉价工具,那是七十年代,中国的出口还处于起步阶段。
    回顾过去,台湾基本上是中共及其支持者为西方市场做好准备,以迎接中国制造业为西方提供廉价袜子的伟大动力。
    中国是一个制造梦寐以求的大钱。廉价的聪明劳动力,已经被任何独立思想或教派严重殴打。
    记得不久前大多数中国人住在农村的泥屋里。蹲下就像呼吸一样自然。
    巨大的提升效果很好,标准也提高了。
    中国工具仍然逊色。只是将它们与日本或德国进行比较。但我认为大规模制造是故意便宜的

    我觉得有趣的一件事是中国人对红色的迷恋。那和大黑色昂贵的 suv。我们会看到

    • 回复: @showmethereal
  98. @mcohen

    Reminds me of the scene in Fatal Attraction where the umbrella breaks and the joke was it was made in Taiwan. But actually…. The manufacturing on Mainland China had little to do with the CPC. They simply invited the Chinese people in Taiwan and Hong Kong and Southeast Asia to open factories… Apple doesn’t make phones in China… A Taiwan originated company does… (though the suppliers are more and more becoming mainland companies)

    • 回复: @mcohen
  99. sally 说:
    @Sick of Orcs

    考虑谁资助媒体分发给观众的内容可以解释很多。

    我要推进我的看法。 中国媒体与西方媒体的区别。

    中国的媒体由中国政府资助,媒体呈现的内容由中国政府控制。 西方的媒体由大型私营公司提供资金,而媒体本身就是私人企业帝国。 .

    在中国,出现在媒体上的内容是国家的话,在西方,出现在媒体上的内容是私营大企业的话。 想想那个区别?

    在中国,所说的内容是经过政府批准的,因此每个人都可以评估该信息对他们个人的意义。 在西方,媒体上的言论得到了私人(非政府)的认可,主要是寻求从西方政府统治下的人那里获利。

    向西方受众分发内容的媒体是私有的,由非媒体巨头公司(例如大型制药公司、大型石油公司、大型软件公司、大型保险公司、大型旅游公司和大型零售商等)私人资助。 . 西方的媒体是一家私营企业,92% 的股份,只有六个人,未经 MSM 六个所有者之一的批准,未经垄断的批准,任何内容都不会传递到西方观众的眼睛或耳朵为全球企业提供动力。 .

    我敢打赌,谁资助媒体对内容的叙述有重大影响?
    中国使用媒体,批准叙述,并使用媒体通知其人民。
    西方政府很少使用媒体,媒体允许的私人制作内容代表政府。 在西方,强大的私营公司为媒体提供资金。 媒体的私人资金来自对免税广告的投资。

    私人媒体<=西方没有重要的官方媒体。 西方媒体是私人垄断企业
    其运营所需的大部分资金来自大型私人垄断(版权和专利)企业主,他们支付广告费用来接触媒体拥有的受众,因此受众成员将购买广告商出售的产品。

    在西方,强大的垄断企业为私人媒体提供广告收入。 在西方,媒体的私人所有者拥有观众,而在中国,收听媒体的观众归政府所有。

    所以在西方,私人广告商向私人媒体所有者支付接触客户(观众)的费用

    好吧,我放弃,谁制作媒体分发给观众的内容?

    有时,政府支付媒体费用来传播其信息,但这种情况很少见。 通常,企业大广告商向媒体付费,媒体购买媒体向其受众分发的内容(新闻、记者、电影、现场报道等)的分发权。 所以西方的私人媒体没有说私人全球垄断企业确实希望观众看到或听到。 即使是西方的政府官员也害怕内容,强大的私营媒体有时会呈现给他们的观众。

    永远不要将媒体分发给观众的内容归咎于西方政府。 始终认为,私人垄断(版权和专利所有者)公司和展示其内容的私营媒体可以控制观众所看到的内容。

  100. @Ace

    Here’s a photo of heritage being destroyed. Palestine was a nice country before the aliens invaded. True, the Palestinians hadn’t always been there; various tribes of humans had moved and settled and moved on. A hundred thousand years or more. Then the ugly people arrived:

    “On the terrace of my grandfather’s I saw a Civilization that lived by fostering life VS a Devilization that can only exist by destroying life.

    On the terrace of my grandfather I saw a culture of Life being momentarily oppressed by a culture of Death.”

    整个故事在:
    https://poetryforpalestinephotos.wordpress.com/author/nahidaexiledpalestinian/

    • 回复: @simple mind
  101. Pancho 说:
    @obwandiyag

    So, the U.S. is fascist.

    为什么? 你问。

    因为银行拥有政府。

    案件结案。

    • 回复: @Mefobills
  102. Pancho 说:
    @Alt Right Moderate

    “Dismiss western scientists for coming up with high tech vaccines to deal with a virus that is killing a lot of white people.”

    真的吗?

    Actually they created the high tech pseudo-vaccines because the virus was not killing enough people.

  103. Mefobills 说:
    @Pancho

    In 1926 Mussolini nationalized the banks because they were swinging the market. Italian banksters were voting absentee stocks to benefit themselves.

    Fascism is one of those words that is twisted beyond its original meaning.

    Mussolini called it corporatism, but what the West has is corporatocracy.

    In fascism the elected government is over corporations. In a corporatocracy corporations string pull and control government.

    • 回复: @Sisifo
  104. @Ukraine Tiger

    If Israeli Jews aren’t like Palestinian Arabs then why do they both look so similar?

    The two peoples are clearly related. Jewish history in the region is 3000 years old of course.

  105. @Emerging Majority

    A “study” is meaningless either way, obviously people who look similar are also related.

    There were about as many people living in “Palestine” or anywhere else 100+ years ago as NW Australia. Many refugees from Europe 做了 go to Australia, and I don’t think there has been any great obstacle to arriving anywhere in the Down Under. People from all sorts scattered across the world before, during and after the War.

    You are confusing the incident of post war “Displaced Persons” with the much larger fact of modern settlement in the land of Israel since 1850, which was developing under British rule since the 1st WW. Israel is much closer to Europe than Australia, so why not Tunisia or Turkey? Because Tel Aviv was founded in 1905.

    There was already a working colony nearby and there were an equal number of Middle Eastern Jews who resettled there as well. Notice how you focused on the one irrelevant thing to the exclusion of the all the actually relevant things.

  106. @Badger Down

    Palestine was an empty country until about 150 years ago, and the population was at less than a million until 1950. The Jews made a desert bloom the Arab made it a desert from the beginning, driving all the most productive people away.

    True, the Palestinians hadn’t always been there

    “Palestinian” is a political fiction invented after 1967

  107. ptarmigan 说:

    Is it not the case that the CCP is a Rothfeller construct in essence and having infiltrated China during the 70’s with Maurice Strong and others,in cahoots with the Kaifeng-(LI) dynasty (Sino Jews) they are now simply playing the textbook Khazarian shuffle of bringing the west to engage in the ww3 (financing both sides) extravaganza famously mooted by Albert Pike in his ‘Morals and Dogma’ Kaballamasonic screed?

    I hear on the tinfoil grapevine mutterings of the ancient Sino Dragon families attempting to wrest control with a new form of financial instrument known as Gesara and Nesara but it’s rarely name checked outside of the more…leftfield platforms so l ask in a spirit of genuine enquiry.

    There’s definitely a feeling of events taking place ‘off-radar’ real end of days biblical grade shennanigans working through.XI’s mention of a keenness to re-connect to the Confucian era seems somewhat of a hint,i’m guessing the Dragon families are fully Confucioned?

  108. Mefobills 说:
    @Jon Chance

    Since Sun Yat-sen was a Georgist, it’s entirely predictable that Jews and “bankers” (counterfeiters) would create and support the CCP, socialism, and global “free trade” protocols.

    Sun Yat-sen was a follower of Henry Carey and the American System of Economy.

    This was decidedly NOT LIBERTARIAN.

    Taiwan and other Asian nations, on the other hand, pursued the course of American Libertarianism:

    LOL JEW BERTarians constantly pass false doctrine. Twisting history is not cool. They are following George now for some reason.

    The American System of Economy used high tariffs and sovereign money. The sovereign money was injected into industry, hence industrial capitalism.

    Henry Carey was Lincoln’s economic advisor, and Lincoln resurrected the American System.

    https://www.europereloaded.com/how-the-real-america-is-in-harmony-with-the-belt-road-initiative/

    China’s “founding father” Sun Yat-Sen, an avowed follower of Abraham Lincoln, composed his International Development of China (1920) calling for international construction of rail, ports and resources from China throughout Eurasia connecting to Europe and Russia (a precursor to today’s BRI). In his work he echoed Gilpin’s vision.


    In the wake of the Civil War (and British orchestrated murder of Lincoln from Montreal, Canada), Gilpin and other Lincoln allies such as William Sumner and Ulysses S. Grant fought to spread the “American System of Political Economy” across the world and nearly succeeded in fulfilling what the American Revolution failed to do with Russia’s Alexander II applying this system to build the Trans-Siberian rail, American statesmen helping to build rail and national credit under the Meiji Restoration in Japan, and pro-American forces in Germany, France and beyond industrializing themselves with rail, national credit, protective tariffs and industrial growth programs. Gilpin went the furthest in illustrating this grand design with his 1890 book “The Cosmopolitan Railway” uniting all continents in railways and calling for something which looks a lot like the Belt and Road Initiative today.

    No way are Lolbertarians for “national credit” they are for international gold. They are basically Sayanim. They might as well be Jews.

    LOL’s cannot build roads, much less rail-roads, as it takes eminent domain power.

    Henry George wasn’t wrong about how privateers in the railroads got rich sitting on their ass, as others improved the lands around the rail. That doesn’t mean he was a libertarian, nor does it mean he was right on all things.

    Henry George economists cannot separate value from price, and neither can Lolbertarians.

    Rail, national credit, protective tariffs and industrial growth programs are decidedly not libertarian.

    Lol’s are actually un-american and are part of a Jewish dialectic designed to snare well meaning people, and wrap them in a false flag.

  109. @Irish Savant

    你用你对说唱“音乐”的描述把它钉在了 Ilana 上。

    没错。 他们称之为音乐。 通常的嫌疑人更加堕落,这应该不足为奇。

    威利弟兄正在解决长期以来一直是娱乐业丑陋部分的两个非常重要的问题:(1)白人犹太经理、代理人、律师和唱片公司高管对黑人艺术家的剥削; (2) 在该行业中对白人犹太人的类似三K党的种族主义。 在他现在被清除的 Voice 采访中,“垃圾说唱歌手”是谨慎的:

    “需要改变的是制度的建立方式,为什么所有这些家庭都富有,或者所有这些人都有遗产,而不仅仅是像英格兰这样的世界各地……。他们仍然将我们视为奴隶。 奴隶制并没有停止,它只是以一百万英镑的创纪录交易而打扮……”

    第一个问题是早期爵士音乐家最尖锐地表达的陈旧抱怨。 犹太黑帮乔·格拉泽控制着美国 70% 的黑人艺人,并抢劫了其中的每一位,包括路易斯·阿姆斯特朗、比莉·霍勒迪和杜克·艾灵顿。 犹太国际象棋兄弟夺走了蓝调大师的盲注,其中包括 Bo Diddley、Chuck Berry 和 Muddy Waters。 Jimi Hendrix 被犹太小偷 Brian Epstein 挤奶; 凶手菲尔·斯佩克特欺骗了歌手达琳·洛夫和他自己的妻子罗尼·斯佩克特; 亚瑟·戈德堡臭名昭著地从小理查德那里偷走了数百万美元。 普林斯与华纳兄弟进行了史诗般的战斗,并开始出现在脸上写着“奴隶”一词。 迈克尔杰克逊公开称汤米马托拉(犹太皈依者)是“剥削黑人才能的种族主义者”。 法瑞尔·威廉姆斯抱怨说:“这真的很奇怪:他们拥有你和上帝播下种子的田地; 你负责收割,但他们拥有所有权。” Wild & Out 的 Nick Cannon 声称“我为 Shari Redstone(nee' Rothstein)Viacom 创建了一个价值 XNUMX 亿美元的品牌”,并且“我的所有权被骗走了……他们多年来一直在虐待和抢劫我们的社区。 ”

    https://noirg.org/articles/white-supremacist-jews-the-ku-klux-klan/

    • 回复: @Badger Down
  110. @Mefobills

    So you want international connections united by railways that are also impeded by protective tariffs at at the same time, and subsidies for the war industries to destroy the connections built through international trade. And Jews Jews Jews Jews Jews

    听起来合乎逻辑

    • 回复: @Mefobills
  111. Joe Wong 说:
    @Mike Tre

    但是圣经是犹太人,如果崇拜中国人是错误的,为什么西方人崇拜犹太人? 为什么西方人不能摆脱犹太人的宗教,回归自己的​​多神论?

  112. Mefobills 说:
    @simple mind

    Atlantacism is Jewish.

    The line of causality runs through Amsterdam, and then to creation of Bank of England. BOE was the world’s fist debt spreading bank.

    Ehret in the link I provided does not name the Jew, but monetary history is clear on this. I’m not interested in blaming Jews capriciously; I am interested in the truth. Jews did operate in Amsterdamn, to return to England, and eventually to be “stock owners” in BOE. They promised certain amounts of gold, but even then they screwed over the English and didn’t deliver.

    Atlantacism is Jewish at inception. The revolutionary war would not have been won if the Lolbertarians were standing around Kvetching about how the Colonials were using George Washington’s Continentals as money instead of Gold.

    Oh wait, the Bank of England and Parliament made Colonial script illegal, and London was sucking gold out of the colony with imbalanced trade. This caused a 10 year long depression, the real reason for the revolutionary war.

    The revolutionary war was against Atlantacism, which included the Bank of England and debt spreading. The BOE had gotten to King George and were whispering sweet nothings in his ear.

    The trial run for Atlantacism was in the Mediterranean during the Levant period (when Greece was ascendant), Jews in entrepot cities would engage with their “international silver” in piracy and moving slaves. Salon’s reforms were a direct result of Jewish silver debts, especially as Greek farmers had to give up their lives and become slaves in the silver mines.

    Protective tariffs of American System are aimed at industrial goods so a nascent industrializing country can get on its feet.

    The original American economy thinkers even thought about your point. For example, they knew that industrial goods would initially be bought, but eventually the sovereign countries would get on their feet using their own internal sovereign credit. In fact, buying ancillary industrial (the small things you cannot make yourself) goods to fuel their nascent industry was critical.

    Subsidies for war industries?

    Subsidies for war are part of Atlantacism, which include Rim Theory where you use blue water navies to intimidate countries into paying usurious debts. It is not win-win, but instead the world hegemon threatens.

    The scheme invented by the Jew and polished in London, includes blue water navies, and hypothecating “bank credit” against a ships bill of lading.

    This is “international credit” or a creditocracy, where a nation tries to assume it is the international creditor of the world. This is how London became a gold center, despite England having no gold in her lands.

    It is logical, but not if you are a LolJewBertarian who is brainwashed about the fabric of reality, and has a twisted view of history.

    • 谢谢: Joe Levantine, Fart Blossom
    • 回复: @Badger Down
    , @simple mind
  113. Liosnagcat 说:
    @Mulga Mumblebrain

    Actually, the banks produce currency, not money. It might seem like hairsplitting, but there is a difference between the two.

    • 回复: @Mefobills
  114. @simple mind

    你一定是个盲人。 以色列犹太人看起来一点也不像闪米特巴勒斯坦人。 他们有欧洲血统。

    • 巨魔: simple mind
    • 回复: @mcohen
    , @showmethereal
  115. Allan 说:
    @RJ Macready

    他们似乎唯一缺乏的领域是太空竞赛。 他们对火星和火箭感兴趣的那一天,我将完全皈依他们。

    中国有 一个空间站, 在月球上放几个漫游车, 完成 登月任务 去年把样本送回地球,然后把 火星上的漫游者 今年。 还有一家中国民营航天公司至少将一颗卫星送入地球轨道。

    • 谢谢: showmethereal
  116. @Emerging Majority

    什么恶性通货膨胀? 十年前的 1923 年出现了一波恶性通货膨胀。 这最迟于 1925 年结束。 大萧条时期曾爆发过大规模失业,但在海因里希·布鲁宁说服盟国放弃《凡尔赛条约》的赔偿要求后,德国经济在 1932 年已经开始复苏。 库尔特·施莱歇尔 (Kurt Schleicher) 在卸任前签署了进一步的凯恩斯主义刺激措施。 希特勒在 1933 年获得总理职位后没有采取任何特别不寻常的措施,这不仅仅是 Hjalmar Schacht 对 30 年 1933 月 1923 日之前已经决定的经济政策的延续。发生在他掌权前十年的 XNUMX 年只是愚蠢的神话。

    • 谢谢: simple mind
    • 回复: @Joe Levantine
    , @simple mind
  117. @Anon

    The same reason “Browder”, “Blavatnik”, and various other “Russian” (((oligarchs))) clawed their way in to Russia’s relatively small, collapsing financial system and became BILLIONAIRES!
    https://www.haaretz.com/us-news/know-your-oligarch-a-guide-to-the-jewish-machers-in-the-russia-probe-1.6113189

    Shakespeare didn’t quibble about the actual cash value of a pound of flesh.

    Where’s that quote about vampire squid and the scent of money?

  118. antibeast 说:
    @Emerging Majority

    The Arab-Israeli conflict is not about genetics nor about ideology but about culture. Who’s an ‘Arab’ today depends upon that person’s language, culture and religion which is inextricably linked to his/her family, clan, village and tribe. Being an ‘Arab’ today means speaking Arabic and practicing Sunni Islam. But that doesn’t make those ‘Arabs’ genetically equivalent to the Bedouin desert nomads who originated in the Arabian peninsula.

    Are Lebanese and Syrian Christians who speak Arabic considered to be ‘Arabs’? The same dilemma applies to Palestinian and Israeli Arabs. If they speak Hebrew and convert to Judaism, are they still Arabs?

    There are too many groups of multi-ethnic settlers in the Levant who came from all over the Mediterranean, West Asia, Central Asia and the Arabian peninsula. That’s why framing the Arab-Israeli conflict as a problem of genetics is wrong-headed as there is no way to ascertain who’s who in the genetic makeup of the populations living in the Levant.

    If the British had partitioned Palestine into two halves: one for Palestinian Arabs and the other for Israeli Jews, would that have prevented the Arab-Israeli conflict? Probably not as the Arabs eventually refused to accept the UN Mandate in 1947. So even if the State of Israel had been in existence for centuries, the Arabs would still have refused to accept the existence of an independent State of Israel and would have done everything to destroy that State.

    The question now is this: why do the Arabs hate the very 主意 of the State of Israel so much? My answer: it’s in their culture.

  119. @Emerging Majority

    Yes! Jews started WW2 in 1933. It’s too bad they won it. We coulda been a contender.

  120. @Fart Blossom

    Most Americans have never heard of a London band called Small Faces. They missed a treat.

    经理:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don_Arden

    宋:

    • 回复: @Fart Blossom
  121. mcohen 说:
    @showmethereal

    台湾和韩国也制造了很多芯片,但在所有这些新的方当背后是一个有毒的制造环境,西方只是简单地出口到亚洲国家。这就是提升的成本。现在玩,以后再买。

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2017-06-15/american-chipmakers-had-a-toxic-problem-so-they-outsourced-it

  122. mcohen 说:
    @Ukraine Tiger

    那么以色列犹太人是什么样子的。我自己从来没有见过,但是在unz上我读了很多关于“以色列犹太人”的文章。幸运的是,有一张罕见的照片,上面有一些可能是犹太人的黑皮肤的人。

    更好的是乌克兰虎长什么样子。它与塔斯马尼亚虎有关吗?塔斯马尼亚虎是印太地区最危险的捕食者。

    • 哈哈: simple mind
    • 回复: @Ukraine Tiger
    , @Sisifo
  123. @Abelard Lindsey

    同意。 如果美国的法律制度是为正义服务的,那么这些新保守主义者中的大多数应该被关进监狱或被吊死在公共广场上,以教导任何叛国者在享受美国公民身份的好处同时捍卫外国利益的叛国罪的后果. 唉,尽管美国和以色列之间的特殊关系对美国的国家利益造成了所有损害,但人们期待已久的大部分美国人口的觉醒只不过是海市蜃楼。

  124. Dam 说:
    @Mulga Mumblebrain

    They literally made the virus, and about anyone with a brain knows that now.

    The sad and rather pathetic fact American traitors like Fauci paid them to do it just makes the situation worse; it does not absolve the Chinese of culpability

    • 回复: @antibeast
  125. @frankie p

    “也就是说,中共将完全控制他们的中央银行和四大银行。 如果不控制货币供应,大犹太人就无法控制一个国家。”

    说得很漂亮。

    对于银行家卡特尔来说,这是美中不足的问题,这些卡特尔通过金融恶作剧吸取了许多国家的人民的骨髓,从而毁了许多国家。 而且中国政府不仅让银行为经济增长和人民福利服务,而且他们正在严密控制不断崛起的寡头政治,正如马云最近的一次木棚之旅所证明的那样,他受到了严厉的警告关于从事掠夺性或垄断性活动。 更重要的是,中国在应对恒大危机时摒弃了“大到不能倒”的讽刺意味,这告诉我们,与迎合银行利益的美国流氓政府相比,共产主义中国更热衷于实行真正的自由市场原则。以人民为代价。

    • 同意: showmethereal, frankie p
  126. antibeast 说:
    @Mulga Mumblebrain

    Oh, dear-and Jews are not ‘tribal’ and can think beyond an ‘US vs THEM paradigm’ can they? Hypocrite racist. The us vs them, the xenophobia and misanthropy psychology has its roots in Judaism, where it remains strongest, having been honed over 3500 years. I despise and fear any xenophobic thug, whether Judaic, Christian, Islamic or ‘Exceptional’.

    I am talking about the State of Israel which has granted civil and political rights to its Arab citizens including the right to freedom of religion. Go to Saudi Arabia or any one of the Islamic States run by Wahhabists and then come back here and tell us if they allow their citizens the same freedom of religion.

    • 回复: @Mulga Mumblebrain
  127. @Mefobills

    Agreed, but I’m mystified by your “Atlantacism”. Is it something to do with Atlanta, Georgia? Or do you mean Atlanticism, like the ocean.

    • 回复: @Mefobills
  128. @Mefobills

    Thank you for your excellent points.

    But when I say Libertarian, I mean genuine American Libertarian — not “Austrian” Libertarian.

    “Austrians” are corporatists, globalists, Jews, and “bankers” (counterfeiters).

    The genuine American Libertarian system is derived from the American Revolution, the 弗吉尼亚权利宣言, the First US Constitution (联邦条款), and Libertarians such as Thomas Jefferson, George Mason, Patrick Henry, Benjamin Franklin, and Thomas Paine.

    XNUMXD压花不锈钢板 美国第一部宪法 indicates in 第八条 how genuine money is issued by public treasuries:

    https://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/artconf.asp#art8

    “All charges of war, and all other expenses that shall be incurred for the common defense or general welfare, and allowed by the United States in Congress assembled, shall be defrayed out of a common treasury, which shall be supplied by the several States in proportion to the value of all land within each State.”

    Sadly, the USA has been under hostile foreign occupation since the “Federalist” coup d’etat of 1787. The Second US Constitution was never lawfully ratified, and it’s been an ongoing hoax for 230 years.

    It’s never too late to reestablish legitimate governments in America, is it?

    https://HenryGeorge.Org

    http://Libertarian.Org

    http://JPChance.Org

    • 谢谢: Fart Blossom
    • 回复: @Fart Blossom
    , @Mefobills
  129. @antibeast

    Islam was founded in the Arabian Peninsula in the 7th century -

    否。 “Diese Frage ist, mit Sicherheit, negativ zu beantworten: die koranischen Sprüche können nicht auf der Arabischen Halbinsel, genauer: in Mekka und Medina, entstanden sein // This question is, with certainty, to be replied by the negative: the koranic verses cannot have originated from the Arabic peninsula, more precisely, in Macca and Medina”, K-H Ohlig, in Vom Koran zum Islam, Verlag Hans Schiler, Berlin 2009, p. 89. In fact, “Islam” was invented by a bunch of scribblers AFTER the year 750 AD [“the koran had at least thirty authors, at most hundred, more probably around fifty”, Die Entstehung einer Weltreligion IV, Hans Schiler Verlag Berlin 2017, pp. 851 sq.] working under and at the behest of the caliphs al-Rashid, al-Ma’mûn (imperavit 813-839) and al-Mu’tasim-billâh.

  130. @Emerging Majority

    Submission is the meaning of the very word “Islam”. 否。 Christoph Luxenberg translates it with “Übereinstimmung (mit der Hl. Schrift) // concordance (with the holy scripture)”, in: Vom Koran zum Islam, Hans Schiler Verlag, Berlin 2009

  131. @Mefobills

    Even though I do not understand 10% (if that) of what you’re writing, it smacks of authority and rings of truth. Thanks for the info. What would you recommend for further reading?

    • 回复: @Mefobills
  132. Rogue 说:
    @Rabbino

    Speer’s book was written under heavy pressure, you should take what’s there with a heavy grain of salt.

    According to David Irving, Speer’s book (which I’ve read) differs in many details from the English to German versions.

    Which is the more “accurate” version, I have no idea.

  133. @Jon Chance

    Sadly, the USA has been under hostile foreign occupation since the “Federalist” coup d’etat of 1787. The Second US Constitution was never lawfully ratified, and it’s been an ongoing hoax for 230 years.

    Finally, someone gets it. The whole system has been a fraud since the beginning.

  134. Mefobills 说:
    @Badger Down

    The Atlantic Ocean. Before that it was the Mediterranean. The international Haibaru Caravaneers moved precious metals and spices overland for thousands of years.

    Then they attached themselves to maritime powers. Greece, then Spain, then Amsterdam, then London. Finally they jumped across the Atlantic to Wall Street.

    The Atlantic Council is part of Globo Homo. Fifth column Atlantacists are operating in Russia.

    Arbitraging metal money, moving goods about, taking usury, making slaves, owning the money power, creating privateering creditocracies is the core of Atlantacism.

    The founding of the US was anti-atlantacist.

    • 谢谢: Badger Down
  135. @Patrick McNally

    “希特勒在 1933 年获得总理职位后并没有采取任何特别的不寻常措施,这不仅仅是哈尔马尔·沙赫特在 30 年 1933 月 XNUMX 日之前已经决定的经济政策的延续。”

    虽然我同意你关于恶性通货膨胀的文章的第一部分,但你声称希特勒没有在德国经济等式中引入新元素的说法是可疑的。 希特勒以积极的方式应用凯恩斯主义,通过公共工程和对工业的支持引导经济转向生产性投资,而不是让银行家从过高的利率中获利,或者让他们有机会像奥巴马那样在经济中占有一席之地。 2008 年的大金融危机,当时美国银行家被纳税人的钱救了,最终拥有了大部分财务违约的房屋。 如果凯恩斯主义去救助财产所有者,那么奥巴马就应该得到历史的赞扬。

    希特勒明确告知承包公司新的公共工程,主要是新建桥梁、运河公路和铁路,他们将雇用普通工人,而不是投资于节省劳动力的机器。 希特勒还与德国的贸易伙伴签署了许多易货交易,特别是那些向德国提供原材料的国家,以换取德国制成品,从而剥夺了银行从对外贸易中获得的大量利润。 总而言之,德国六分之一的新工作进入了军备行业,以重建德国武装部队,其余的进入文职工作,失业率从 1933 年的 XNUMX% 上升到两年后的 XNUMX%。 自然,信心因素在吸引包括美国在内的许多国际企业集团的外国直接投资方面发挥了关键作用。

    希特勒基本上将金融从属于工业,而不是过去五十年在银行家占主导地位的西方普遍存在的相反现象。

    • 同意: Mefobills
  136. Mefobills 说:
    @Jon Chance

    乔恩,

    The word “Libertarian” was destroyed by the Austrians. Fascism is another word that has lost its meaning.

    I use “American System” because it runs straight through the founding fathers. Matthew Carey was Franklin’s apprentice. Henry Clay coined the term because there was no other way to describe it.

    What people also don’t get, is that there were two views of humanity at war with each other during the revolution.

    As Ehret says in the link I provided above:

    The fact that the American Revolution was an international affair is made evident by the fact that without the collaboration of the leadership of Russia, France, as well as many powerful forces in Poland, Spain and Germany, the revolution could never have succeeded

    One view is that an “elite” group of creditors by virtue of taking usury and various schemes is to control the world with subterfuge and hidden string pulling.

    This is a “creditor” over “debtor” dynamic, first elucidated in Hillel’s Prozbul Clause. Time becomes linear, and is no longer cyclical. Debts go on forever and mount, and then pay Creditors. Creditors pay old debts with new debts. New debts are created at the point of the spear, or a slave class is created to flog the earth to then pay creditors.

    The other view is to use sovereign money (not international gold), which is under the law, and direct said money at the commons and industry.

    The Colonials had direct experience with the “other view” as they invented industrial capitalism (the American system), especially in Massachusetts Bay. John Winthrop introduced it, and Cotton Mather wrote about it. It was then transmitted to Benjamin Franklin, who ran the system in the Pennsylvania Colony, where Matthew Carey wrote about it.

    There is also plenty of back and forth data among the Colonials about “yankee workshops” where they used water wheels and invented mass production (mostly to make guns).

    They talked about how they didn’t want to be a “coolie” labor country, like China. They wanted to elevate labor with high education, public health, roads, and improving the commons.

    Ironically, the U.S. has been overtaken by Atlantacism, especially by 1912, and now has amnesia.

    Russia and China are our natural allies. Germany was a natural ally as well. As long as England is (((Atlantacist))) they are the enemy. Of course there are plenty of internal enemies now, as Atlantacism was internalized. Austrian Libertarianism is an internalization, a dialectic of false narrative.

  137. Mefobills 说:
    @Fart Blossom

    What would you recommend for further reading?

    There is no book or source that can take you from zero and build you up. If you go to college and learn ne0-liberal economics, you are damaged for life. If you get sucked into libertarian orthodoxy, you are put into a cul-de-sac, where you don’t have language to understand reality.

    I’m going to agree with PCR, you have to start with Hudson, and then branch out. Hudson can be difficult, so it will be no cake-walk.

    https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2018/05/09/economic-truth-turn-michael-hudson/

    It is probably down to me to write a book for normies (to go from zero), and is one of the reason’s I come here to UNZ. I’m taking the pulse of the public.

    • 回复: @Fart Blossom
    , @Fart Blossom
  138. Jackshaker 说:
    @obwandiyag

    You’re actually retarded if you think that’s what communism is. People in china are allowed to own property, houses, their own businesses….you need an education on what communism is. Not to mention, who do you think owns the banks in the US?

    • 谢谢: Showmethereal
    • 回复: @obwandiyag
    , @Fart Blossom
  139. JBHoren 说:
    @cd of central FL

    Compliment, criticism, or just a mention in passing? Perhaps another instance of “Havana Syndrome”?

  140. Mefobills 说:
    @Liosnagcat

    Actually, the banks produce currency, not money. It might seem like hairsplitting, but there is a difference between the two.

    Above is a lolbertarian talking point. See how deep the mind screw goes?

    Humans use ideology to help them navigate the world. Most humans are hoaxed at an unbelievable level.

    Banks create BANK CREDIT at debt, in a process called hypothecation. Any talk about currency is a dead letter.

    All money today is bank credit, with a tiny amount of bills and coins that are also bank credit at source.

    Currency means to make current, to flow. Currency today is bank credit that is flowing, and not yet been made deactivated as savings, or stuck in bank reserve loops.

    When bank credit flows in the private banking system, it is jumping from ledger to ledger. Even if you spend physical money in the forms of bills or coins, said physical money is used to decrement or increment somebodies double entry ledger somewhere.

    Banksters freak out about dominoes of contagion. If Maria cannot pay Joe, who cannot pay Ralph, then all of the interconnected loans/ledgers start to fail in an unwanted positive feedback mechanism. They don’t want their “money factories” to be lost by contagion, or they will lose their easy life of taking rents and usury.

  141. @Joe Levantine

    希特勒就任总理后仍然有效的凯恩斯主义措施是在他上任之前制定的,并不是他的倡议。

    “作为上任仅 XNUMX 天后的最后一项工作,施莱歇尔内阁开始最终批准实施财政措施所需的财务措施,以实施总理一开始承诺的将是他的首要任务的创造就业计划。 当天晚些时候,该法案以总统签署的紧急法令的形式成为法律。 该计划为旨在为失业者提供就业和刺激整体经济活动的各种公共工程项目提供了 XNUMX 亿马克。 在接下来的六个月里,当将近 XNUMX 万失业的德国人找到工作时,库尔特·冯·施莱歇尔 (Kurt von Schleicher) 一分钱都没有。 相反,政治受益者将是阿道夫·希特勒。”
    — 亨利·阿什比·特纳,《希特勒的三十天上台》,第 133 页。 XNUMX.

    希特勒是这种凯恩斯主义刺激计划的发起者的神话是戈培尔最初宣传的最长期存在的宣传之一。

    • 回复: @Mefobills
    , @Joe Levantine
  142. Mefobills 说:
    @Patrick McNally

    你们两个基本上都是对的。 你在争论细节。

    希特勒没有发起刺激,计划在他上台之前就已经完成。

    但是,希特勒热衷于让人们重返工作岗位,并在上任前一直与专家交谈。

    来自泰多尔:

    成为总理后两天,希特勒在全国广播电台中概述了他的经济计划:“四年之内,德国农民必须摆脱贫困。 在四年之内,必须最终解决失业问题。” 政府根据德国财政部国务卿弗里茨·莱因哈特(Fritz Reinhardt)构想的战略制定了法律。 这位朴素,务实的经济学家提出了一项创造就业的国家计划,前提是要给人以工作报酬要比给他们失业带来的好处要好。

    关于恶性通货膨胀,最好的治疗方法是由 Zarlinga 完成。

    https://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/articles/hyperinflation-e.html

    Yes, the Reichsbank had been privatized under the Dawe’s plan.

    泰多尔再次:

    A commission chaired by the American Charles Dawes made recommendations to balance Germany’s budget and stabilize the money system. The Allies assumed control of the Reich’s Bank and sold shares in the national railroad. They fixed annual payments at \$250 million. Another committee convened in Paris in February 1929 under the American banker Owen Young. The Young Plan arranged a new payment plan for Germany to extend to 1988. Since 1924, Weimar had been borrowing from Wall Street banks to meet reparations demands. The worldwide fiscal crisis of 1929 curtailed this source of capital. Despite tax increases, the German government failed to generate sufficient revenue to restore the economy. By March 1933, the German national debt
    达 24.5 亿德国马克。

    哈德森谈到导致恶性通货膨胀的债务三角流动。 现代历史上所有的恶性通货膨胀都是由汇率压力造成的。 (除了津巴布韦,他们在那里杀死了生产基地——白人农民)。

    https://michael-hudson.com/2017/11/germanys-choice/

    这笔款项高得无法支付,以至于德国陷入紧缩和崩溃。 由于德国央行印制马克投入外汇市场,该国遭受了恶性通货膨胀。

    债务的三角流动是由于德国市政当局在美元市场上承担债务。 债务增长速度快于支付能力。 德国也被禁止出口商品以获取美元,这给马克带来了汇率压力。

    The Reichsbank AUTHORIZED private banks within the German private bank system to “print money.” Read Zarlinga now as he identifies the banks who were given printing privileges.

    The “printing” was an after affect of currency shorts (bear raiding like Soros does), where the Mark was attacked by the international.

    The physical money printed was a response to double entry ledger mechanics, i.e. the creation of new shorts/debts which were new loans backed up by “international” gold, dollars, pounds and francs.

    Schacht was a gold man, and took his time to authorize MEFOBILLS, which mostly were aimed at armaments. Oeffabills were aimed at industry. Schacht had a mea-culpa later in life, and we are all allowed to grow and admit we were wrong. Schacht finally admitted that gold wasn’t money.

    Mefobills 是对犹太人对黄金的痴迷的即兴表演(记住几千年来贩卖贵金属的 Haibaru 驴商队)。

    MEFOBILLS =Metallurgische Forschungsgesellschaft(冶金研究公司)

    金属研究公司。 哈哈。 国家社会主义者有幽默感。

    • 同意: Malla
    • 谢谢: Joe Levantine
    • 回复: @simple mind
  143. @simple mind

    “The Jews made a desert bloom the Arab made it a desert from the beginning, driving all the most productive people away”

    Ummm… It was a desert long before the Arabs lived there… And if the Bible is the basis for the people of Israel – then do you not believe that the Israelites were driven out in two waves for their disobedience to God? Because if Israel is secular – then they have no rights to the land at all. If that be the case then every country should revert back to who lived there thousands of years ago. It can’t be both.

  144. @Mefobills

    “China’s “founding father” Sun Yat-Sen, an avowed follower of Abraham Lincoln, composed his International Development of China (1920) calling for international construction of rail, ports and resources from China throughout Eurasia connecting to Europe and Russia (a precursor to today’s BRI)”..

    You are absolutely correct on that part. Sun Yat Sen is venerated on both sides of the Taiwan Straits. China’s high speed rail network is the 21st century version of Sun’s plans. That is openly stated. It is actually a sign of proof (and the other elements that you named) that the CPC is the rightful party who carried out Sun Yat Sen’s vision to restore China’s glory – culminating in the “New Silk Roads”.

    • 回复: @Mefobills
  145. @Ukraine Tiger

    You are half correct. The Ashkenazi are the European Jewish converts. The Mizrahi Jews (who make up half the Israeli population) are almost indistinguishable from Palestinians. They are mainly Semites (with various mixes of Yemeni – Berber – Arab – Persian etc etc)

    • 回复: @simple mind
  146. @Mefobills

    I would definitely need a twisted view of history to follow that and think it was somebody else who got “twisted”. So when did they find time to invent the bagel in between slaves and silver mines 8,000 years ago?

    • 回复: @Mefobills
    , @Lurker
  147. @showmethereal

    The Bible also says the “remnant” would return at the End of Days (now). Nobody has any “rights” in land so this is gibberish either way. It is exactly whatever it is, and the Arabs made it into desert, while the Jews made it bloom.

    If the birds could vote they would speak Hebrew.

    The basis for Israel in the last 120 years is all the settlement and colonising work that was done, besides countless drops of blood, sweat, and tears. That’s all the “right” anyone needs in this world, and it is truly the foundation of all rights anyway.

  148. @Mefobills

    It is probably down to me to write a book for normies (to go from zero), and is one of the reason’s I come here to UNZ. I’m taking the pulse of the public.

    I say the following as a big fan of your comments.: No probably about it. Hop to it!!

    • 同意: Lurker
  149. @showmethereal

    Not even half right, most Israelis are pretty similar to many other Levantines

    • 回复: @Emerging Majority
  150. @Patrick McNally

    As usual, the idea that “Muh President” controls the economy is modern idolatry and navel gazing by hero worshipping retards.

  151. @Mefobills

    Thanks for the link. One of the best PCR articles I’ve read.

    He ends with this.:

    China’s love of success and money could doom this rising Asian giant as well if the government opens China to foreign finance capital and privatizes public assets that end up in foreign hands.

    I cringe every time I think of that happening. I hope they’re smart enough, strong enough and their leadership is moral enough not to let that happen.

    • 同意: Mefobills
  152. Stones 说:
    @profnasty

    I doubt Chinee are much more intelligent than legacy (White) Americans.
    These numbers seem way off.
    US has metastasized cultural cancer. But 300 to 10? I doubt that.

    I think that 30:1 ratio might be correct for IQ’s of 160 comparing China to to the US. The population ratio is ~4.25:1 (2020), which leaves a ratio of ~7:1 in favor of China on an equal population basis for those very gifted IQ 160 individuals.

    If the bell curves are shifted by the IQ differences ( 104.1-97.43 =6.7) , it will produce substantial ratios at the toes of the curves. And 160 IQ is very far out on the toe.

    To add to this perspective, the IQ difference between china and the US is 45% of the black/white difference here in the US. Maybe this is a main reason for Smart Money moving to China.

    • 回复: @Mefobills
  153. @Badger Down

    Speaking of treats…

    From your link.:

    In 1966, Arden and a squad of “minders” turned up at impresario Robert Stigwood’s office to “teach him a lesson” for daring to discuss a change of management with Small Faces,[1] which became one of the most notorious incidents from the 1960s British pop business. Arden reportedly threatened to throw Stigwood out of the window if he ever interfered with his business again.[11]

    In 1979, one of Arden’s successes, Black Sabbath, sacked their vocalist Ozzy Osbourne. Sharon entered into a relationship with Osbourne, and took over his management from her father.[9] Arden was livid. Reportedly, the next time Sharon visited Don, his vicious pet dogs savaged her.[12] She was pregnant at the time and lost the child. Sharon eventually married Osbourne and had no contact with her father for 20 years.[12]

    • 回复: @Mulga Mumblebrain
  154. Allan 说:

    If China, or at least an influential portion of the population, is genuinely returning to Confucianism, that bodes well for better relations with Taiwan, which maintained respect for Confucius while the Maoists were moving fast and breaking things. However, to fully decouple from the worst aspects of “Western” civilization, and from its half-brother, Islam, the Chinese will need to proceed ever more boldly against the Abrahamic cancer within their borders. Likewise, they need to sharpen their critiques of democracy and prepare to make territorial claims against it, esp. throughout the Pacific. Making those claims on the grounds of retributive justice and preventive self-defense has been made much easier because of choices made by the bullying, busybody West itself.

    In the case of Abrahamism, the Chinese must totally extinguish all Christian assemblies in their territory, however submissive those assemblies may be to the central government. The pious idolator, whose main contribution to civilization has been insanity, needs to be eradicated by reeducation, expulsion, or death. Probably this is planned already, but anyone can see that for PR reasons the Chinese must move slowly until they have finished what they started with Muhammadism. If the Chinese are consistent when ridding their land of JC, they will see the merit of replacing the ridiculous and degrading scheme of counting years from the birth (approximately) of a suicidal Semitic mangod. Careful attention to detail here will teach all of their movers and shakers, if they are so slow that they haven’t figured it out already, that the root of the Abrahamic problem is the nation of Israel, which will be a recurring threat to China until he has been extinguished. (Or imprisoned on the planet of the Roman war god, Mars? It would be a fitting irony for people who have called their god the lord of hosts.) The evident mission of Israel, both nation and state, is subjugation of the whole world. So the Chinese need to understand that Israel must perish or leave the Earth. Of course, none of this is auspicious for a friendly long-term relationship with Christianish Russia, which is basically doomed because of its recidivism and other problems.

    As for democracy, the Chinese need to understand and publicize its internal contradictions in some way calculated to humiliate the self-righteous fools of “Western” civ. They need also to stop accepting the language of smug gasbags like Biden, which leads the Chinese to utter a few perfunctory remarks of approval for democracy from time to time. Instead, they need to bluntly excoriate the degenerates for democracy’s tendency to provoke world wars, in addition to it being a suicide pact which wastes, exhausts, and ruins its own nations. There can be no room for the cult of democracy in China if the Chinese expect to escape the tentacles and strangling vines of the filthy, despicable West.

    The Chinese, being somewhat shewd and patient, are in a position to be a much better Nippon of the next 100 years. Certainly they don’t need to take crazy risks of being destroyed and occupied after angering most of their neighbors. In fact, the ball is in China’s court to initiate, if they can summon the wisdom, a genuine rapproachment with Nippon. There will be, I’m sure, some people on each side who will agree that the Nipponese, in spite of their own supremacist predilections, were mostly behaving theirselves until the usual pests intruded again in the 1850’s, as the pests recon their years. Breaking the ice there could lead to the humble pie moment that Nippon needs to become an ally of China. What follows next, if both sides are careful, is a working relationship which respects each side’s interests in expelling the demons and their collaborators from Nippon, and eventually from all of the western Pacific Ocean. The Chinese, again being somewhat shrewd, ought to extend their own symbols of peace to conquered Pacific islanders such as the Hawai’ians, Marshall Islanders, and so on. That gesture, if followed by verifiable shows of good faith (say, on Tibet), would surely raise the morale of the remnants of the various Pacific island nations and embolden them to prepare for liberation from the most pernicious civilization in human history.

    The big wrinkle with Confucianism, however, is that it carries too little of the necessary unsecular dimension. So China needs another ingredient here to stabilize itself and be cleansed. This will have to come from outside of Confucianism. As it turns out, a defunct sect of the religion of another ancient master, an Indian prince no less, provides us with 线索 about what this 其他维度 will be. If China will tolerate a revival of the type here suggested, Asia will be on the verge of another great improvement in foreign relations: China as an ally, not an enemy, of Mata Bharat, who needs to emerge from the long night of Brahminism, Abrahamism, and democracy.

    • 回复: @René Fries
  155. obwandiyag 说:
    @Jackshaker

    Idiot. You know what communism is from watching 50s spy movies.

    You are wrong. Communists own property. If you think property-owning is non-communist, well, then you are an idiot who learned about communism from watching 50s spy movies.

    Yeah, I know. Real communists would take away your Teddy Bear, moron.

    • 回复: @Fart Blossom
  156. @simple mind

    Simple like an adder—or is it Adler? Beginning with Arthur Koestler’s “The Thirteenth Tribe” and currently emblazoned on the site “Khazaria.com”, with innumerable sources should you be possessed with something other than pilpul and chutzpah, to further bolster the matter; the Khazarian nation was converted en masse, ca 740 AD by their ruling Kagan to specifically Talmudic Judaism. Though somewhat of a composite nation, the rootstock of the Khazarians, by linguistic analysis, has generally established to be Finno-Ugrian, linguistically.

    The vast majority of American Jews today, but not prior to the 1890’s are Ashkenazim, who, except for the Cohanim and Levites, a quite small minority, are of Eastern European, Khazarian descent. By outward appearance, these relatively recent converts to Talmudism, look and are primarily European, with some north-central Asian admixture and that tiny infusion emanating from the priestly class which answers exclusively to the Sanhedrin.

    Jewish history in the greater region points back to the Hebrews emanating from southern Arabia and their alleged “Exodus” out of Egypt is merely faux mythologization.

    You do appear to be more mature in your approach than a simple Sayanim, so we may we assume that you are a member of the world’s largest masonic secret society, the B’nai Brith? Of course Lev Frank’s Anti-Defecation League may also come into play as a modest possibility.

    • 谢谢: Sisifo
  157. @simple mind

    Today, most Israelis are of the Mizrahim, a conglomeration of ancient Hebrew and various other Middle Eastern genes. They are, though numerically near majority status in the Zionist Entity, thoroughly and prejudicially mistreated by the Jabotinskyites. Being of primarily Semitic, along with some Persian ancestry, those Israelis “are pretty similar” to many other Middle Easterners. To conflate them with Levantines, primarily of Phoenician stock, is another of those areas where you stray off the reservation.

    Let me tell you this: As a convicted Zionist, you should be full well aware that there is NO Jewish People. There are at least five discrete Jewish peoples. I could cite them and their histories of Judaization, but you should already be quite aware of that reality. Although the Zionist project, most probably formulated by the brilliant Benjamin Disraeli for the Rottenchild Crime Clan and the shadowy Sanhedrin”judges” of Babylonianized Talmudics; has long stressed the CREATION of a conglomerated Jewish people as a central goal of the Zionist project ongoing in Occupied Palestine.

    • 回复: @simple mind
  158. @simple mind

    So the Jews have made the Palestinian desert “bloom”, perhaps like Yiddy Bloom, the late brother of the late Kid Cahn Bloomenfeld who ran the rackets in Mill City for decades. All farce aside, however, shall we consider the blooming present in the chopping down of thousand year old olive trees on the remnants of Palestinian land by Khazarian Brooklyn “Settlers”…all supported by the tax dollars squeezed out of the American working class.

    How about the “blood, sweat and tears” of the survivors of the 1948 Naakba where Palestinian natives, mostly descended from the ancient Hebrews, were massacred by the likes of the Shtern Gang and the founders of the Likudniks?

    Colonialism, whether by the land speculators such as George Washington, known to the Lenapi people as the “destroyer of towns”, or by alien invaders of European ancestry, but of Khazarian descent; is an evil manifestation of some of the worst traits of the human race.

    And fuck your goddamn book, while we’re at it. No way would any creator in his right mind opt for a “Chosen People” = “Master Race” and not only condone, but actually encourage policies of genocide against the natives of Jericho or the Amalekites. What goes around, comes around, Bubba.

    • 回复: @Joe Levantine
    , @simple mind
  159. @showmethereal

    When the early Zionists visited Palestine, they reported that it was highly fertile and well-cultivated. The desert blooming may be true of parts of the Negev, but otherwise a dirty Zionazi lie, if you’ll pardon the tautologies.

    • 回复: @simple mind
  160. Bert33 说:

    CNN 将在拍卖区出售并出售。 扎克的宣传机器深陷困境

  161. @antibeast

    Yes, in that instance Israel is superior to Saudi, but that’s a very low bar, isn’t it. On the other hand Israeli Arabs face at least sixty discriminatory laws and procedures, and active, aggressive, attacks from Judaic extremists. Moreover they are concentrated in ghettos in the Galilee because Jews DO NOT want to live alongside them.

  162. @Allan

    In the case of Abrahamism, the Chinese must totally extinguish all Christian assemblies in their territory, however submissive those assemblies may be to the central government. The pious idolator, whose main contribution to civilization has been insanity, needs to be eradicated by reeducation, expulsion, or death.

    - “Abrahamism”: Abraham never even existed [“in der Bibelwissenschaft besteht ein Konsens darüber, dass es Abraham nicht gegeben hat”, in: 伊斯兰教的自由, K-H Ohlig et al, Verlag Hans Schiler, Berlin 2007, p. 310], his model having been the neo-Babylonian king Nabonid [Die Entstehung einer Weltreligion III, Schiler Verlag Berlin 2012 p. 95]

    - “Insanity”: as I wrote under https://www.unz.com/article/guillaume-durochers-the-ancient-ethnostate-biopolitical-thought-in-ancient-greece/,

    (......) my emphasis (lay) on Blumenberg’s “Inkarnationsgedanke” and the developments it generated due to a very specific dynamic inherent to the said “Inkarnationsgedanke”. In the words of Hans Blumenberg: “(…) vielmehr hatte die theologische Spekulation selbst sowohl die Notwendigkeit herbeigeführt als auch die Systemverbindung geliefert, um die in der Gottesspekulation gewonnenen Kategorien mit der Vorstellung vom Menschen in Kommunikation zu setzen”, in: 新的合法性, suhrkamp taschenbuch wissenschaft 1268, Frankfurt/Main 1999, Section Four, “Aspekte der Epochenschwelle”. My translation may be approximative: “(…) rather it was the theological speculation itself that brought about the necessity as well as the systemic liaison (needed) to put into communication, the categories won in the theological speculation with the representation of Man”. So one can read in in Marie-Dominique Chenu, in 圣托马斯达奎恩和神学, collection “Maîtres spirituels”, éditions du Seuil 1959, p. 126: “ainsi chaque substance (etc.) / so each substance realizes, according to its nature, its own finality in the general finality of the universe (…) liberty inscrives itself in the nature, and the natural law comprehends the imperative of a free will. The person, absolute value 关于这种自由(等)”,强调(粗体)我的。 顺便说一句,Thomas Aquinas,在“Summa theologica”中,quaestio 97,艺术。 1 还谈到了“……eigen gezagdragers te kiezen / 选举他们自己的代表”,在: 过湿, Uitgeverij Ambo/Baarn 1996, p. 120.
    However, all this only was a prerequisite to a development which 仅 could occur in Europe, see Ralph Raico https://fee.org/articles/why-europe-rose-and-others-didnt/ : “(…) the key to western development is to be found in the fact that, while Europe constituted a single civilization — Latin Christendom — it was at the same time radically decentralized. In contrast to other cultures — especially 中国, India, and the Islamic world — Europe comprised a system of divided and, hence, competing powers and jurisdictions. — After the fall of Rome, no universal empire was able to arise on the Continent. This was of the greatest significance. Drawing on Montesquieu’s dictum, Jean Baechler points out that ‘every political power tends to reduce everything that is external to it, and powerful objective obstacles are needed to prevent it from succeeding’ (Baechler 1975, 79). In Europe, the ‘objective obstacles’ were provided first of all by the competing political authorities. Instead of experiencing the hegemony of a universal empire, Europe developed into a mosaic of kingdoms, principalities, city-states, ecclesiastical domains, and other political entities. — Within this system, it was highly imprudent for any prince to attempt to infringe property rights in the manner customary elsewhere in the world. In constant rivalry with one another, princes found that outright expropriations, confiscatory taxation, and the blocking of trade did not go unpunished ” (emphasis mine).
    Thereupon came the aforementioned evolution triggered by the “Inkarnationsgedanke”. Again Ralph Raico: “As Anderson has summed up the evidence, ‘the scientific and technical stasis that followed the remarkable achievements of the Song dynasty,或 the flowering of early Islam, 表明 scientific inquiry and technology do not necessarily possess in themselves the dynamism suggested by the European experience’ (Anderson 1991, 46). On the contrary, 技术和科学产生于一组相互关联的政治、法律、哲学、宗教和道德元素 in what orthodox Marxism has traditionally disparaged as the ‘superstructure’ of society”, emphasis mine. Elsewhere in the text, Raico speaks of “Lord Acton’s analysis of the central role of the Catholic church in generating Western liberty”. So, the said “interrelated set” precisely is what made possible the existence of each and every human being currently living, insofar as without the said set, none of the modern scientific achievements would have been possible. This concretely means that without the vaccinations commenced around 1800, a great many of our direct ancestors wouldn’t have survived, which concretely means that the “dissemination of genes” would have taken another course in each family, which concretely means that you and I and your and my neighbors simply would not exist. Thanks to the Catholic Church as shown above, we DO exist, however.

    “民主”: Hannah Arendt tells us that “(…) die demokratische Gesellschaft, in der wir leben, ist eine lebendige Angelegenheit, die von niemandem hergestellt werden kann und die nicht als Idee begriffen und ergriffen werden kann. Sie ist nicht vollkommen und wird nie vollkommen sein, weil der Maβstab der Vollkommenheit hier nicht am Platze ist // (…) the democratic society in which we live, is a living affair that cannot be fabricated by anyone and that cannot be conceived nor seized as idea. It is not perfect and never shall be perfect, because the criterion of perfection is not at its place here”, pp. 236-7 in In der Gegenwart. Übungen im politischen Denken II, Piper Verlag GmbH, München, 2. Auflage April 2017

    • 回复: @Allan
  163. @obwandiyag

    共产党人拥有财产。

    Not only that, but “Communists” at the top typically have the most and the finest of whatever they want. I doubt Mao, for instance, ever missed a meal.

    布尔什维克的资金来自纽约。

    The Communist movement, like most other movements that get attention, was a fraud as usual. Just one example of many…

    [更多]

    “Leon Trotsky, whose real name was Leyba Davidovich Bronstein, said:

    ‘We must turn Russia into a desert populated by white negroes upon
    我们将对其施加暴政,例如最可怕的东方暴君
    做梦也没想到。 唯一不同的是,这将是左翼暴政,
    不是右翼暴政。 这将是一个红色的暴政,而不是一个白色的暴政。
    我们的字面意思是“红色”这个词,因为我们将摆脱这样的洪水
    鲜血将弥补资本主义战争中遭受的所有人类损失
    相比之下,地震和苍白。 大洋彼岸的最大银行家将
    与我们保持最密切的联系。 如果我们赢得了革命,我们
    将在革命的废墟上建立犹太复国主义的力量
    葬礼,我们将成为一种力量,全世界都将在其面前
    跪倒在地。 我们将展示什么是真正的力量。 通过恐怖和
    大屠杀,我们将把俄罗斯知识分子贬低到一个完整的状态
    stupefaction and idiocy and to an animal existence… At the moment, our
    身着皮夹克的年轻人,他们是来自
    敖德萨、奥尔沙、戈梅利和文尼察,知道如何讨厌俄罗斯的一切!
    他们以肉体摧毁俄罗斯知识分子为乐
    — officers, academics and writers!…’”

    [正如在阿隆·西马诺维奇的回忆录中所记录的那样,一位在宫廷工作的珠宝商
    沙皇陛下,拉斯普京的秘书,并被许多俄语引用
    学术著作,包括 Vladimir Stepin 的《锡安主义的本质》,出版
    (俄文)在莫斯科,1993 年并被翻译成英文……作者
    克莱夫·林德赫斯特。]

    犹太复国主义与俄罗斯,Valdas Anelauskas 的 8 场太平洋论坛讲座
    file:///C:/Users/jeff/Downloads/communism%20Zionism%20And%20Russia%20trotsky%20bankers.pdf

    • 同意: Malla
  164. @Mulga Mumblebrain

    Ethics, indeed.

    Did you happen to see my comment # 115?

  165. @Jackshaker

    Not to mention, who do you think owns the banks in the US?

    And it’s almost amusing how often they switch sides. One day they’re supporting the Reds, the next day they’re attacking them, and almost nobody catches on.

  166. @Emerging Majority

    So what? That sounds like a feature not a bug.

    1 Kings 2:2-3 Observe what the LORD your God requires: keep his decrees, commands, and laws so that you may prosper in all you do and wherever you go.

    That’s all you need to know

    BTW Eugene Levy and Judd Hirsch told me you are blind

    • 回复: @Emerging Majority
  167. @simple mind

    Colonel Muamar Gaddafi the great Libyan and African leader had his plans to make the Sahara bloom well underway, and who destroyed that project and murdered the Great Leader of the Green Revolution, you scumbag?

    • 回复: @simple mind
  168. ntn 说:
    @Mulga Mumblebrain

    OMFG comment of the article. I disliked being in China and hope to not go back. But man those guys can fucking sing. Sitting in the back of a cab and listening to some nice mandarin crooner is some of my few positive memories … There’s gotta be 100 million barber shop quartets in that country …

  169. “中国领导人知道什么是心灵的慰藉,他们想为这个国家注入本土文化的寄托。”

    完整而彻底的牛肚,默瑟女士!

    正如哈利·布朗(Harry Browne)许多个月前在他的现场广播演示中亲自告诉您的那样:政府“解决方案”永远不会奏效。 (无论我们谈论的是美国政府,还是中国政府,还是任何其他政府,这种观察都是正确的。)

    任何相信政府强制推行的儒家思想实际上会给他/她/中国带来好处的中国公民,就像你现在看起来一样容易上当受骗。

    习近平和他的凶手集团的执法将实现的只是他们自己的个人财富,甚至比他们已经拥有的对他人生命的更大权力,而牺牲了中国其他所有人的人身自由。

    换言之,中国的国家强制儒学,与世界上任何其他国家强制推行的任何东西都没有什么不同,最终将损害普通中国人的健康和财富。 (顺便说一句,这可能是真正的目标😎)。

    特别是对你:关于_所有_政府的真实性质的一些提醒:

    “政府是一种伪装成自己治愈方法的疾病” 罗伯特·勒费布雷

    “政府的一切都变成废话”林戈·斯塔尔(Ringo Starr)

    “那种希望政府采纳并执行自己的思想的人永远是那种思想愚蠢的人。” HLMencken

    “无论在任何地方发现国家,在任何时候进入其历史,人们都无法将其创始人、管理者和受益人的活动与职业犯罪阶层的活动区分开来。” 来自:Albert J. Nock 的“我们的敌人国家”:
    https://mises.org/library/our-enemy-state-0

    “国家一直是,而且一直以来都是人类的最大单一敌人,它的自由,幸福和进步。”默里·罗斯巴德(Murray Rothbard)

    “政府擅长一件事。 它知道怎么打断你的腿,然后递给你拐杖说:“如果没有政府,你不会走路”。
    哈里·布朗

    “政府行不通”哈里·布朗(Harry Browne)
    https://wiki.mises.org/wiki/Why_Government_Doesn%27t_Work

    “问候” onebornfree

  170. @Joe Levantine

    Homeowners don’t need a “bailout”, we need to focus on land law and the rights of adverse occupancy, identifying when claims expire over time. Mortgages are just financial positions taken on the local property index, that’s why the deed system exists in the first place.

    The Sheriff Sale IS the “bailout”, because the land is sold short of all liens and goes to the highest bidder. What’s missing is systematic 赎回 of the sale price, so we are guaranteed that mythical “loan modification” everyone is after. Otherwise it’s just a bunch of accounting statements, which are meaningless to real life.

    Money and currency are subject of national economy, not “houses” and other private things. 80% of all “homeowners” would have been satisfied with the simple right of redeeming the sale, just as it already works in tax sales. This is the fundamental problem, that “mortgage foreclosure” is treated as though it was different from any other lien enforcement, which it is not. Redemption is no. 1 at all times:

    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Leviticus%2025&version=NIV

    29 “‘Anyone who sells a house in a walled city retains the right of redemption a full year after its sale. During that time the seller may redeem it.

    30 If it is not redeemed before a full year has passed, the house in the walled city shall belong permanently to the buyer and the buyer’s descendants. It is not to be returned in the Jubilee.

    31 But houses in villages without walls around them are to be considered as belonging to the open country. They can be redeemed, and they are to be returned in the Jubilee.

    • 回复: @Joe Levantine
  171. Mefobills 说:
    @showmethereal

    中国共产党是实现孙中山复兴中国光辉愿景——最终实现“新丝绸之路”的正当政党。

    I’ve wrestled with this too. Who is the rightful party?

    My hope is that both Taiwan and China will reunify peacefully, as they both have Sun Yat Sen’s vision, and can find common cause.

    是美国和亚特兰大主义阻止了统一的发生。

    Atlantacism is predicated on goods moving about by ship – and blue water navies. Taiwan is an outpost that can interdict shipping using Rim Theory. The outposts are conveniently located on shipping routes.

    我一直在提醒人们,亚特兰大主义是一种植入的记忆,而不是美国人。 如果你是美国人,并且相信金融资本主义和保护债权人的远征战争,那么你就是叛徒。 如果你相信拜金主义和金融恶作剧而不是生产经济,那么你就是叛徒。

    孙中山继承了美国的传统,在建国之初就传给了美国人民。

    我想说的是美西战争(1898 年),然后是泰迪·罗斯福和他的白色舰队环游世界(1907-1909 年),当时亚特兰大主义者已经崛起,控制了美国的大脑中心。 1912 年的选举巩固了成果,然后是世界大战的悲剧。 欧洲人民被错误的意识形态扭曲了。

    • 回复: @Showmethereal
    , @frankie p
  172. @Mefobills

    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Leviticus%2025&version=NIV

    All that matters is land and release:

    [更多]

    The Sabbath Year

    25 The Lord said to Moses at Mount Sinai, 2 “Speak to the Israelites and say to them: ‘When you enter the land I am going to give you, the land itself must observe a sabbath to the Lord. 3 For six years sow your fields, and for six years prune your vineyards and gather their crops. 4 But in the seventh year the land is to have a year of sabbath rest, a sabbath to the Lord. Do not sow your fields or prune your vineyards. 5 Do not reap what grows of itself or harvest the grapes of your untended vines. The land is to have a year of rest. 6 Whatever the land yields during the sabbath year will be food for you—for yourself, your male and female servants, and the hired worker and temporary resident who live among you, 7 as well as for your livestock and the wild animals in your land. Whatever the land produces may be eaten.

    禧年

    8 “‘Count off seven sabbath years—seven times seven years—so that the seven sabbath years amount to a period of forty-nine years. 9 Then have the trumpet sounded everywhere on the tenth day of the seventh month; on the Day of Atonement sound the trumpet throughout your land. 10 Consecrate the fiftieth year and proclaim liberty throughout the land to all its inhabitants. It shall be a jubilee for you; each of you is to return to your family property and to your own clan. 11 The fiftieth year shall be a jubilee for you; do not sow and do not reap what grows of itself or harvest the untended vines. 12 For it is a jubilee and is to be holy for you; eat only what is taken directly from the fields.

    13 “‘In this Year of Jubilee everyone is to return to their own property.

    14 “‘If you sell land to any of your own people or buy land from them, do not take advantage of each other. 15 You are to buy from your own people on the basis of the number of years since the Jubilee. And they are to sell to you on the basis of the number of years left for harvesting crops. 16 When the years are many, you are to increase the price, and when the years are few, you are to decrease the price, because what is really being sold to you is the number of crops. 17 Do not take advantage of each other, but fear your God. I am the Lord your God.

    18 “‘Follow my decrees and be careful to obey my laws, and you will live safely in the land. 19 Then the land will yield its fruit, and you will eat your fill and live there in safety. 20 You may ask, “What will we eat in the seventh year if we do not plant or harvest our crops?” 21 I will send you such a blessing in the sixth year that the land will yield enough for three years. 22 While you plant during the eighth year, you will eat from the old crop and will continue to eat from it until the harvest of the ninth year comes in.

    23 “‘The land must not be sold permanently, because the land is mine and you reside in my land as foreigners and strangers. 24 Throughout the land that you hold as a possession, you must provide for the redemption of the land.

    Redemption of Land

    25 “‘If one of your fellow Israelites becomes poor and sells some of their property, their nearest relative is to come and redeem what they have sold. 26 If, however, there is no one to redeem it for them but later on they prosper and acquire sufficient means to redeem it themselves, 27 they are to determine the value for the years since they sold it and refund the balance to the one to whom they sold it; they can then go back to their own property. 28 But if they do not acquire the means to repay, what was sold will remain in the possession of the buyer until the Year of Jubilee. It will be returned in the Jubilee, and they can then go back to their property.

    29 “‘Anyone who sells a house in a walled city retains the right of redemption a full year after its sale. During that time the seller may redeem it. 30 If it is not redeemed before a full year has passed, the house in the walled city shall belong permanently to the buyer and the buyer’s descendants. It is not to be returned in the Jubilee. 31 But houses in villages without walls around them are to be considered as belonging to the open country. They can be redeemed, and they are to be returned in the Jubilee.

    32 “‘The Levites always have the right to redeem their houses in the Levitical towns, which they possess. 33 So the property of the Levites is redeemable—that is, a house sold in any town they hold—and is to be returned in the Jubilee, because the houses in the towns of the Levites are their property among the Israelites. 34 But the pastureland belonging to their towns must not be sold; it is their permanent possession.

    Release of Debtors

    35 “‘If any of your fellow Israelites become poor and are unable to support themselves among you, help them as you would a foreigner and stranger, so they can continue to live among you. 36 Do not take interest or any profit from them, but fear your God, so that they may continue to live among you. 37 You must not lend them money at interest or sell them food at a profit. 38 I am the Lord your God, who brought you out of Egypt to give you the land of Canaan and to be your God.

    39 “‘If any of your fellow Israelites become poor and sell themselves to you, do not make them work as slaves. 40 They are to be treated as hired workers or temporary residents among you; they are to work for you until the Year of Jubilee. 41 Then they and their children are to be released, and they will go back to their own clans and to the property of their ancestors. 42 Because the Israelites are my servants, whom I brought out of Egypt, they must not be sold as slaves. 43 Do not rule over them ruthlessly, but fear your God.

    44 “‘Your male and female slaves are to come from the nations around you; from them you may buy slaves. 45 You may also buy some of the temporary residents living among you and members of their clans born in your country, and they will become your property. 46 You can bequeath them to your children as inherited property and can make them slaves for life, but you must not rule over your fellow Israelites ruthlessly.

    47 “‘If a foreigner residing among you becomes rich and any of your fellow Israelites become poor and sell themselves to the foreigner or to a member of the foreigner’s clan, 48 they retain the right of redemption after they have sold themselves. One of their relatives may redeem them: 49 An uncle or a cousin or any blood relative in their clan may redeem them. Or if they prosper, they may redeem themselves.

    50 They and their buyer are to count the time from the year they sold themselves up to the Year of Jubilee. The price for their release is to be based on the rate paid to a hired worker for that number of years. 51 If many years remain, they must pay for their redemption a larger share of the price paid for them. 52 If only a few years remain until the Year of Jubilee, they are to compute that and pay for their redemption accordingly. 53 They are to be treated as workers hired from year to year; you must see to it that those to whom they owe service do not rule over them ruthlessly.

    54 “‘Even if someone is not redeemed in any of these ways, they and their children are to be released in the Year of Jubilee, 55 for the Israelites belong to me as servants. They are my servants, whom I brought out of Egypt. I am the Lord your God.

    • 回复: @Mefobills
  173. Mefobills 说:
    @Stones

    http://lagriffedulion.f2s.com/

    http://lagriffedulion.f2s.com/sft2.htm

    You might be ready for the above links. IQ distribution profiles are different between the races, as you already know.

    Once thing economists don’t do, is apply race realism to their thinking. For example, economists in the 60’s were always bleeting about how Brazil would be the next U.S.A. If you invested according to their advice you would have lost out.

    Brazil is a continental country, has X amount of natural resources, etc.

    The people within the country matter a lot.

    • 谢谢: profnasty
  174. Mefobills 说:
    @simple mind

    那么他们什么时候有时间在 8,000 年前的奴隶和银矿之间发明百吉饼呢?

    你的头脑很简单。

    一个犹太人会坐在希腊市场的户外长椅上。 希腊农民想要一些来自地中海某处的奢侈品,主要是为了给他的妻子或女朋友留下深刻印象。 他想得到一些。

    你经常会发现这种事情,女人让男人做疯狂的事情。

    在那些日子里,犹太人的身体显然与希腊人不同。 它们往往更小更黑,具有明显的闪米特特征(更多尼安德特人)。

    一个犹太人会向希腊农民赠送一块泥板,并说农民会将他的印记印在粘土上。 标记是用手写笔完成的。

    白银会从账簿中散发出来,农夫那天晚上可以得到一些修剪。

    对银矿的控制,尤其是在吕底亚的银矿,让“国际犹太人”在收割时使白银变得昂贵。 由于无法获得白银以偿还他的白银债务,农民不得不以折扣价出售他的货物和商品。

    最终,如此多的农民被委托到银矿,粮食生产停止了。 许多农民成为奴隶,建筑物只面向大海,因为船只来接新“铸造”的希腊奴隶。 那个 p*ssy 肯定物有所值,不是吗?

    早在基督之前,这种高利贷的恶作剧就已成为犹太人方法的重要组成部分。

    历史上犹太人被赶出国家约108次并非偶然,这是由于“土地紧邻土地”(使用虚拟资本和高利贷手段)。

    当耶稣开始他的使命时,是在禧年。

    Judasim现在是一个债权人宗教,它保护债权人的权利。 犹太教是债权人宗教,保护债权人的权利。

    https://michael-hudson.com/2018/08/and-forgive-them-their-debts/

    并免除他们的债务,读者将发现关于债务如何在塑造古代社会中发挥核心作用的令人震惊的历史真相。 也许最引人注目的是——在亚述学家和圣经学者的几乎完全共识中 ——圣经关注的是债务,而不是罪。

    仍在等待我的犹太朋友承认他们使用虚构的资本和高利贷作为寄生虫控制的机制。 我不会屏住呼吸。

    • 谢谢: frankie p
  175. @simple mind

    While I cannot approve or disapprove of this suggestion since I sense that it pertains to the realm of law rather than economics and finance, I have already expressed on this site my point of view about interest charging as one of the most destructive factors to a productive economy. The price of money in the West is set by the money changers whom we call bankers and central bankers. Those people create money out of nothing where central bankers expand the money supply without tying the expansion to productivity and commercial banks get the licence to buy promissory notes from clients and expand the money supply each time they approve a loan to a customer. The problem with lending against collateral is that the banker is not taking true responsibility for approving a bad loan since he can always reclaim the collateral should the client fail to make the loan for a valid or not so valid reason. The Catholic Church has fought usury tooth and nail for fifteen centuries with a justification given by Saint Thomas Aquinas As ‘ the sterility of money’ while he perfectly legitimised free trade among two parties whose product is subject to the same risk of nature like two farmers exchanging through barter or money their produce, for both of them have engaged in a productive activity that is subject to the vagaries of nature. Aquinas refused to allow sterile money to create money through interest. Unfortunately, the Catholic Church succumbed gradually to the temptation of interest earnings when she started selling bonds of indulgence while using the proceeds to finance the Catholic Usurers like the German Fugger family and the Italian Medici family.

    Public banking should allow every family to own a house with interest free credit. If a borrower is unable to pay his dues beyond a grace period, the defaulter can always reclaim the totality of the payments adjusted for inflation and depreciation and abandon the house to a new buyer.

    As for commercial banking, Islam which forbids usury has an interesting proposal which is called Murabaha, which means that the provider of the loan does not charge interest but gets a cut of the profit and should the borrower fail to make a profit then the lender does not have the right to foreclose on any assets of the borrower since the lender is a partner in loss and in profit. German industry and banking are doing something somehow similar where German banks offer loans on a long term basis and own shares in the client’s growing business where the borrower is allowed the time to move into profitability without having to worry about short term financial pressures.

    If we are to render banking an honourable business, banks should be bringing lenders and borrowers together and arranging a partnership between the two parties in return for a fee. Thus money creation out of thin air is curtailed along with its inflationary pressures and productive investment will be the backbone of the economy without the financial shenanigans.

    • 回复: @simple mind
  176. @Patrick McNally

    谢谢你的信息。 无论是希特勒的功劳还是施莱歇尔都没有实际意义。 希特勒通过限制银行家从贪婪的借贷行为中获利的能力来切断银行家的翅膀。 希特勒巩固权力虽然“不民主”,但确实极大地增强了人们对欧洲工业最发达经济体之一的前景的信心,并增强了国内外投资者的信心。 希特勒禁止工业罢工,同时让工人阶级有机会靠“快乐中的力量”等福利谋生,创造了相当于工业家的天堂。 虽然我不赞成或反对民主自由与另一方面的增长和稳定之间的权衡,但我不同意希特勒在后魏玛共和国奇迹般复苏中的作用被忽视。

    • 回复: @Patrick McNally
  177. Allan 说:
    @René Fries

    Thanks for that info about Nabonid. I’ll look into it. In point of fact, I’d already come to believe that Abraham never existed, or was a composite figure, or was a real guy about whom many myths were were written. Nobody needs to become lost in the weeds of a dispute about that, however. Rather, let’s just read Genesis 1 and compare its claims about the cosmos to what we find when investigating the cosmos without regard to the leading prejudices of “Western” civilization.

    Supposedly there is a raka aka shamayim (i.e. a firmamment aka heaven) to which is attached the Moon, the Sun, and the other stars, too. Aristarchus of Samos, however, gave a convincing argument thousands of years ago that the Sun is much, much farther away than the Moon, and this has been corroborated by more precise measurements and calculations during the past few hundred years. We have also sent voyagers to the Moon, and they never crashed into any shamayim while in orbit around it. Also, if Genesis were correct, the Moon would be at about the same distance from Earth at times of solar eclipses, which we know is not true. So shamayim a hoax. Since it’s evident from the text that elohim and shamayim are a bundled deal, i.e. you must take both or neither, it follows that elohim, too, is (or are) a hoax. From this it follows that the most important parts of the story about Abraham must be legendary.

    That paragraph with “Inkarnationsgedanke” contains much to be suspicious about. For example, the remark that “each substance realizes, according to its nature, its own finality in the general finality of the universe” is telological mumbojumbo, crude physics, and flawed cosmology, too. Also, anyone who uses the phrase “free will” approvingly is obliged to explain first just what the noun “will” is supposed to mean. If we find that it incorporates the idea of freedom, then why is it necessary to supplement it with the adjective “free”? If, on the other hand, “will” does not include freedom, why call it will? And why tolerate blatant doubletalk such as “free will”?

    It’s by the way that Thomas Aquinas longed to make his ridiculous Christology compatible with Aristotelianism. So basically he was a syncretizer, and wholly insane, at that. But we can easily imagine Aristotelianism, which is apallingly defective in certain respects, being applied to other complicated dogma and, as a result, producing interesting new syntheses. This brings me to St. Hannah Arendt, who opined that…

    Sie [Demokratie] ist nicht vollkommen und wird nie vollkommen sein

    Well, ok but so what? No system of human government will ever be volkommen. So why prefer democracy when its vices and bad habits are obscene and radically dangerous? Arendt’s apologetics are weak and mealymouthed in another way, too:

    die demokratische Gesellschaft, in der wir leben, ist eine lebendige Angelegenheit, die von niemandem hergestellt werden kann…

    Think about that for a moment. Democratic society can’t be fabricated. So from where does it come? Is it a divine gift?! Well, no. Human sophists fabricate democratic faith with specious arguments about a will of the people, equal rights, and other lies, but a crowd of pious dupes does not a democratic society make. Democracy is a governing institution, and the incessant screaming of democrats makes it clear that, according to them, no govenment is legitimate if it has not been established democratically. This would be done through some sort of plebiscite, would it not? And would not that popularity contest require some government to organize it and to impose the results, if the masses approved of the ringleaders’ plans? Of course it would, but we can ask if that organizing government is itself democratic. If so, the plebiscite is unneeded and spurious; democratic government already exists. If the organizing government is not democratic, the plebiscite is invalid when judged by the sophists’ own standards.

    Here is some more from Holy Hannah:

    und die nicht als Idee begriffen und ergriffen werden kann

    From that comment we learn that the great doctor of democracy couldn’t think of any plausible excuses for democracy which could bear sustained scrutiny. So she retreated to a favorite old refuge of theologians, namely obscurantism.

    Thanks to the Catholic Church as shown above, we DO exist, however.

    That’s just sophomoric nonsense. First of all, the claim depends upon an unstated assumption about the very nature of space and time. You are blinded by the Church’s own longstanding dependency upon cosmological presentism, but there’s a better alternative, which I indicated with a link in my earlier comment.

    Now, somebody asserted that

    Europe comprised a system of divided and, hence, competing powers and jurisdictions.

    That was true of Europe before the Roman empire and the invidious Roman ecclessia of JC.

    Somebody asserted that

    it was highly imprudent for any prince to attempt to infringe property rights in the manner customary elsewhere in the world. In constant rivalry with one another, princes found that outright expropriations, confiscatory taxation, and the blocking of trade did not go unpunished

    Except there was serfdom. Also, Adam Gurowski insisted in 历史上的奴隶制 that the Jews were leading factors in the slave trade within Europe. Is he reliable on that point? I don’t know, but if so, we may presume in all fairness, I think, those same princes were involved in [ahem] not blocking that slave trade. Because “property rights”. Fools like Raico, Lew Rockwell, and so on love to pose as holy men when writing apologetics to protect the racket of limited liability capitalism, because “property rights”, but this is ironic if you think about it. Libertarians are always complaining about the central banking state, but CB is a creature of incorporation and its insatiable thirst. Now the fools’ precious limited liability capitalism is turning on them ferociouly, having decided that the libernuttians’ apologetics is no longer needed. China, Nippon, etc. will struggle mightily to free theirselves from this disease too, and no points will be awarded for explaining from whom they caught the disease.

    I could go on, but it’s unnecessary to do so here. The old pattern of chauvinism is easily rebutted and knocked down. So I stand by my earlier condemnation of “Western” civilization, the civilization of nuclear weapons, democracy, world wars, fake freedom, fanatical militarism, Zionism, corporate capitalism, the Great Reset, and a long war on the whole biosphere of Earth. Since your civilization is a sickness of lower worlds, we ought to condemn it, eradicate it, and move on. If its ringleaders, apologists, and masses won’t let go of it, they can be wiped out by those who wish to ascend from the lower worlds of existence. Or maybe those reactionaries and their sheep will be wiped out by underworlders, as appears to be the case through mass migration into Europe and N. America. Whatever the outcome, we can see that momentum favors elimination of the perps, their toxic religion, or both.

    • 回复: @simple mind
  178. obwandiyag 说:
    @Fart Blossom

    你很困惑。

    Nobody is starving in China right now. Nobody.

    People are starving in the US.

    You don’t even know the difference between right and wrong.

    That’s called “sociopathology.”

  179. @simple mind

    The bible does say a remnant. It also notes that Jerusalem would continue to be a stumbling block to the world and there would still be problems because of ungodliness un the holy land. The arrogant western evangelicals think they can rush God’s timetable to justify the wars they support.

    Again if the bible is not the reason then Jews have no rights… The whole argument is about who has the rights to the land. If you advocate might then you support invasion as long as the invader “improves” the land. The UN granted borders and rights for 2 states. So which is it??

    But I see your argument is just politics.

    You have to make up your mind. Is it politics – the bible – or might you base your argument on. Those three dont make a good mesh. You cant mix Mike Pompeo doctrine with the UN mandate and with the bible. That is confusion… Which of course was foretold would happen.

    • 同意: Joe Levantine
    • 回复: @Joe Levantine
  180. @Joe Levantine

    正如我所说,有关政策是别人提出的,只是希特勒执行的。 事实上,希特勒推动军备建设造成了经济紧张局势,导致沙赫特于 1936 年辞职,并把事情带到了一个地步,如果不发起可能导致全面战争的冒险,就很难证明继续下去是合理的。 但至于纯粹凯恩斯主义的一面,其他人已经摆在桌面上。 没有迹象表明任何由希特勒特别发起的政策在经济复苏中发挥了特殊作用。 大多数情况下,复苏只是布鲁宁说服盟军放弃赔偿的结果,如果希特勒一年前上任,这样的人永远不会这样做。 但 1932 年开始的金融复苏对生产性经济的影响缓慢,因此施莱歇尔主张采取一些凯恩斯主义的刺激措施。

  181. Mefobills 说:
    @simple mind

    All that matters is land and release:

    Our Jewish friends don’t follow their own advice, do they? The “creditor class” took over the religion. The Talmud is a screed that overturns Mosaic law.

    _______________________________

    https://michael-hudson.com/2019/04/the-delphic-oracle-as-their-davos/

    JS: Now I’ve brought along the transcriptions of several Egyptian papyri for you to look at. I also want to show you a papyrus in Aramaic from Judæa. It’s not direct evidence that the post-exilic Jews were having Jubilee years, but it’s indirect evidence, because it says that a particular debt has to be paid, even during a time of general debt amnesty, even if it falls due in a shmita [שמיטה], a sabbath year. So it sounds like the Jews were finding loopholes —

    MH: It certainly sounds like it! Babylonian creditors tried a similar ploy, but this was disallowed. (We have court records confirming the realm’s misharumacts.)

    JS:在摩西免除债务的诫命中,我们是否可以推断出在流亡后的耶路撒冷已经制定了某种免除债务的计划?

    MH: Yes, but it ended with Rabbi Hillel and the Prozbul clause. Debtors had to sign this clause at the end of their debt contracts saying that they waived their rights under the Jubilee year in order to get a loan. That was why Jesus fought against the Pharisees and the rabbinical leadership. That’s what Luke 4 is all about [And there was delivered unto him the book of the prophet Isaiah. And when he had opened the book, he found the place where it was written, “The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he hath anointed me to preach the gospel to the poor; he hath sent me to heal the brokenhearted, to preach deliverance to the captives, and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty them that are bruised, to preach the acceptable year of the Lord”= the Jubilee year.] Luke also pointed out that the Pharisees loved money!

    • 回复: @simple mind
  182. @simple mind

    Your goddamn Old Testicles is little more than a plagiarized crock of hooey. So don’t throw that crap at me in hopes that it would stick.

    Such a response to my comments? Oy and Vey. “…feature not a bug”. Both the CIA and Mo\$\$ad feature bugs, so what am I sposta do about that?

    Levy and Hirsch? What should I know about them? So maybe Levy is descended from the Levites, while Hirsch is a cherry tree. How does that matter?

    • 回复: @simple mind
  183. @Joe Levantine

    The realm of law is what governs finance and economy, otherwise the accounting labels are meaningless, because “possession is 9/10th the Rule”. The other 1/10th is in the judicial system of titles.

    Usury has little to do with mathematic calculations or “profit shares”, it is the suspension of ordinary time limits in property right. To “rent” the land out forever without becoming tenant property at some point is usurious, hence the longstanding doctrines of wards夫, 豁免禁止反言… i.e “time limits” to make or enforce claims.

    How do you “prohibit” usury without prohibiting enforcement of debt? The “honorable relationship” is where neither party has to await payment from the other, ever. IOW 贷款借款 are just a state of mind, because everything devolves to “now” at some point. Credits and Debits are accounting terms that result in property titles, so it only matter what defines a “title”, not what formula was used to keep an account.

    There is no usury in the accounting system or by calculating “interest”, usury just means “rent”. To make things rented forever is usurious and destructive of the good.

  184. @Showmethereal

    “The Bible is not a land deed nor is God a real estate agent“

    Gerald Celente of 趋势研究网

    I guess that settles it for the Bible. What remains to decide the fate of Palestine are might and international law, and as long as the United States is a world leader and a power to reckon, might will have the upper hand.

    • 回复: @Showmethereal
  185. @Fart Blossom

    这里唯一的问题是这个虚假的“托洛茨基语录”是否真的由 Aron Simanovitch 或 Vladimir Stepin 或某个身份不明的第三方制造。 西蒙诺维奇确实写了一本书,书名是拉斯普京:他的秘书的回忆录。 但所谓的“回忆录”归因于西马诺维奇,这点废话声称引用的甚至听起来不像西马诺维奇出版的实际回忆录。 一方面,尽管 Simanovitch 的实际出版物以这个名字开头,但标题中没有提到拉斯普京。

    • 回复: @simple mind
  186. @Emerging Majority

    Very well argued. Thanks for the clarity of thought and the courage.

  187. @Mefobills

    Well nobody owes you a loan right? The issue is in defining the right of property by time limits to make outside claims, so that loans becomes irrelevant. And this has remained the law or custom forever, surviving into the legal system of every country on earth.

    I read a bit from the USSR Constitution of 1921 which if memory serves it basically stated that “possession belongs to the worker” and “land to the farmer” and “house to the holder” “office to the clerk”… meaning there has to be an organic relationship between “doing” and “having”. Allowing “creditors” to pretentiously own the abstract, tradable asset ends in the enslavement of men to things and the domination of nature itself.

    Marx & Co. were right after all, capitalism is about the alienation of life from “being”.

  188. @Emerging Majority

    If you google “Judd Hirsch” and “Eugene Levy”, they are both famous actor comedians of very swarthy bent, and who are descended of E. European Jews. The point is that the so-called “Ashkenazim” are just as Near Eastern by appearance as anyone else from the Levant, or the ancient Mediterranean.

    I assumed you’d get the reference since they are so well known.

    • 回复: @Emerging Majority
  189. @Emerging Majority

    The survivors of the 1948 Palestinian Nakba are now called “Israelis”, and they drove out their tormentors with great courage against all odds. As for burning trees, that has “Arab” written all over it, which literally translates as “those who await in ambush”, lurking in the ravines. “Arab” i.e. “Arav” or “Ravine”.

    The Creator evidently opted for a Chosen People, to bring forth his Law that is now written into the constitution of every nation. Israel is a light for all Nations, and some day all nations will worship in Jerusalem. The Book is always right! And the ugly, deformed and ungodly always hate it.

    The Arab Palestinians of 1948 could not possibly descend “mostly from ancient Hebrews”, and if you told them they were Hebrews it would be returned with either a blank stare or a knife. Recently somebody invented the legend of “Canaanites”, which is what happens when you don’t have any history.

    Somehow all these “facts” escaped notice until somebody dreamed it up yesterday.

    Everyone who ever visited the Jewish settlement of Palestine in real history easily remarked that it was an oasis in a third world shytehole, as it remains today. The imaginary “Palestinians” showed up later, since there were only about half a million people of any strip in that narrow land c. 1900.

    If it was up to the birds they’d vote “Jew” since it means care for nature, while Arabs bring deforestation and wasteland everywhere they go.

  190. @Mulga Mumblebrain

    It was a barely inhabited province of the Old World, with no more than half a million souls c. 1900.

    Considering that half the people still lived in walled towns and highland villages, the rest must have been mostly empty. What happens in the real world is the potentially best areas get abandoned first when law and order collapses, because it requires some kind of government to maintain.

    The lands were mostly abandoned and THAT is the report that was made, obviously amount of “cultivation” had to be vanishingly small, since most people were impoverished and miserable. It was more like Sicily or Albania, with bandits everywhere, clans and tribes at each other’s throat, and very little economy.

    • 回复: @The_MasterWang
  191. @Mefobills

    一个统一的中国对美国/英国和日本来说是一个可怕的想法。 他们将尽其所能阻止它。

    But yes both the Mainland and Taiwan sides use his image for legitimacy… Interstingly his widow chose to stay on the Mainland rather than flee to Taiwan with the KMT. She too is venerated – on the Mainland side.

    But there really isnt much that separates the two. The main issue is whether China should have a western style government or its own system. Other than that – there is no real difference. The CPC at one time did start to thrash any traditional Chinese culture – seeing it as backwards… But that stopped almost 30 years ago… In some ways it is the opposite that once Taiwan ended martial law and forged a western style democracy in the 90’s – it is becoming an even more of a liberal western style society than either Japan or South Korea. This is not the ultra conservative Taiwan than the KMT sought to make it. Some of his rules were more strict than Saudi Arabia today.

    • 谢谢: Mefobills
    • 回复: @frankie p
  192. @Joe Levantine

    I disagree because I do not believe humans will ever be able to solve that problem (jerusalem).. Global powers like the US currently are just temporary placeholders in time. I just dont like the hypocrites like “simple mind” who like to selectively quote the bible and then promot completely ungodly means to solve problems.

  193. @Allan

    You are ignoring the poetic style and calling it a “hoax”. The 苍穹 is where the sun, moon, and stars are located, it’s not a “thing” to smash out there. It just means “out in space”. The Bible is 100% accurate when it is rightly divided, and understood in context.

    • 巨魔: Mulga Mumblebrain
  194. @Patrick McNally

    我真的怀疑托洛茨基真的这么说,他太忙于生活在现实世界中。

    • 回复: @Patrick McNally
  195. frankie p 说:
    @Mefobills

    “我希望台湾和中国都能和平统一,因为他们都有孙中山的愿景,可以找到共同的事业。”

    我住在台湾,我可以证明台湾离孙中山的愿景越来越远,甚至离任何对中国人的认同都越来越远。 这对我来说非常令人担忧,因为这是对他们文化身份的否认。 此外,民进党和美国建制派也助长了它,他们将台湾视为(一次性)遏制工具。 我自己的利益是保护台湾,我的家。 在中美之间的任何形式的交战冲突中,付出最终代价的都是台湾。

    • 谢谢: Showmethereal
  196. frankie p 说:
    @Showmethereal

    “有趣的是,他的遗孀选择留在大陆,而不是随国民党逃往台湾。”

    她讨厌蒋介石在孙中山死后所采取的方向。 查尔斯宋是三个女儿和一个儿子的父亲。 长女宋爱玲嫁给了孔子的后裔、中国首富孔公。 他是国民党政府下的中国财政部长。 (关于三姐妹,中国人说:“一个爱钱。”)。 第二个女儿是宋庆龄,嫁给了中国国父、中华民国第一任总统孙中山(当时包括共产党人)。她与家人决裂,留在战后的中国支持共产党,并在 1959 年至 1972 年间被任命为中华人民共和国联合副主席,这主要是一个荣誉职位。 (中国人说:“爱国”)三妹宋美龄嫁给了国民党领袖、中国军队总司令、后来的中华民国总统蒋介石,将政府迁至台湾,在那里他以独裁者的身份统治,直到他于 1975 年去世。(中国人说:“一个热爱权力”)。

    Wiki 将引用归因于毛或毛主义。

    “一个爱钱,一个爱权,一个爱她的国家”(中文:一个爱钱、一个爱权、一个爱国)

    阅读 Sterling Seagrave 的《宋朝》一书。 值得一读。

    • 回复: @Showmethereal
  197. @simple mind

    So now I should google Hirsch and Levy? They should google each other, for all I care. So what are they, wandering minstrels or something? Well, I refuse to allow a Boobtoob in my home, so if that’s where they are so famous, I could get more entertainment outta the book of Amos.

    If the “Ashcans” look like Middle Easterners, so what about two of my former classmates, Steven Dingfelder and Randy Flachsbart? Steven was blue-eyed and red-haired. Randy was blond and blue, much more common than black and blue. So now you’re gonna complain and kvetch that they were not Jews?

  198. @simple mind

    Fuck the ancient Hebrew Tribal WarGod, Yahweh. He is absolutely not Creator. It is simply a travesty of justice, honor and basic common sense to consider such a bloodthirsty, genocidal monomaniac as the actual Creator of all Being.

    So now you deny the Naakba and the massacre of thousands of Palestinian women, children and elders by the likes of Jabotinsky and the other self-described Yiddischer terrorists.

    “His Law”…my skinny little Norwegian ass. “constitution of every nation”. What you are evidently smoking is not natural, organic and green.

    Sounding more and more like you are one of those terminally deluded dupes of the “Reverend” James Hagee and his damnable “Christian” Zionists. Nothing Christlike about those rabbit-turds. They await the Rupture, so they can go stark naked and waft magically up into the Heaven-Bound spaceship.

    P.T. Barnum famously said: “There’s a sucker born every minute”. He also intoned: “You can’t go broke underestimating the gullibility of the American people”…well at least in a certain church in Fort Worthless, Texas.

  199. @simple mind

    It looks like we have a real alpha hasbara liar, here, every word a lie, or an inversion of reality. And the bit about the non-existent ‘Creator’ choosing a people whose cult is one of undiluted HATRED for all non-Jews, is a proposition as nauseating as it is lunatic. In fact, this Evil swine illustrates the very worst essence of Judaic hatred in its filthy libels of the Palestinians.

  200. @simple mind

    Usury is as Jewish as lox and bagels. As a previous article here illustrated, ‘vulture capitalism is Jewish capitalism’, both tautologous.

    • 回复: @simple mind
  201. @simple mind

    The blood shed was that of the Palestinians. Israel’s ‘hard work’ was mostly in extorting hundreds of billions from the US colony, and from the Germans as reparations, and from typical Jewish business enterprise, such as sex trafficking, arms trafficking, human organ trafficking, blood diamond trafficking, binary options financial crime, online gambling, drug trafficking, particularly of ecstasy, surveillance and spying systems and equipment etc, and the money extracted by Diaspora Jews from victims like Russia, and shipped to Israel for ‘safe-keeping’.

  202. @simple mind

    我可以向你保证,列昂·托洛茨基从来没有说过这样的胡言乱语。 我唯一的疑问是,真正的阿隆·西马诺维奇是否真的将这样的假名言归咎于托洛茨基,或者更有可能是后来的恶作剧者将假名言归咎于西马诺维奇。

  203. @simple mind

    In Bible parlance, if God saw fit to scatter the Jews, why do they now defy Him by gathering again in the Levant and seizing the lands that He gave to others?

    Are they gathering to build a new temple and to worship God truthfully? This can be the only righteous motivation.

    If it is any other motivation, then it is curse on God’s plan.

    • 回复: @Showmethereal
    , @simple mind
  204. antibeast 说:
    @Dam

    They literally made the virus, and about anyone with a brain knows that now.

    If that were true, then how come Europe already had the SARS-CoV-2 virus back in Oct. 2019 before the discovery of the Wuhan strain in Dec. 2019? Also, how come there were multiple strains of the virus which emerged in two different parts of the world — Wuhan, China and Bergamo, Italy — almost simultaneously?

  205. @frankie p

    他们选择了自己的命运。 让他们骄傲地死去。 作为他们渴望成为的美丽而开明的性别非二元荣誉白人。 看看那个代表台湾参加民主峰会的美丽勇敢的生物。

    有人告诉我台湾比中国优越,因为他们可以观看和欣赏《瑞克和莫蒂》。

    台湾无可救药。 对不起。

    • 回复: @Showmethereal
    , @frankie p
  206. 默瑟女士是否像投资对冲基金所有者雷·达里奥、苹果公司的库克、耐克公司或 NBA 的大多数人一样,是习近平和中国的另一位辩护者?

    有求知欲的人想知道。😛

    “达里奥故意无知地为中国共产主义辩护……这是卖绳资本家精心策划的虚伪……”

    来自:“中国的美国推动者”:
    https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/18035/china-us-enablers

    “问候” onebornfree

  207. @frankie p

    您可以参加每年举办的几个海峡两岸论坛中的任何一个。 如果你住在台北,前几天刚刚结束的上海和台北论坛。

    https://www.tellerreport.com/news/2021-12-01-2021-shanghai-taipei-city-forum-held.r17tabxHYY.html

  208. @frankie p

    Oh yes – that book is in my library. I should dust it off. A few pther books like “A Force So Swift” and “China Mirage” do touch on the influence the Soong Clan had over Roosevelt and Truman… But yeah Seagrave – being that he live in Asia was able to go much further into the Soong family

    但是是的,她住的房子被保存在内地。 她被视为女主角。

  209. @littlereddot

    You are 100 percent correct. People like him only use the bible for convenience in their politics. It is supoosed to be the other way around. Biblical prophecy says what you described will only happen when their back is against the wall and they have nowhere else to turn to. So the silly evangelicals who think they will bring about Armageddon by their own works are fools since using military to defend a secular Israel will defeat the purpose. That is why others pointed out elsewhere that some of the most religious Jews do not support the current state of Israel because they see it as apostate and an afrront to God.
    Case in point. Israel and the UAE are now good buddies and the UAE now has formed the Abrahamic family house for religious interaction… Right at the same time it has loosened laws and now allows for cohabitation and now has just announced they will allow western movies with no editing of nudity and sex and violence. So what next??? Homosexual parades like in Tel Aviv???? So much for “holy land”. Its politics…

    • 同意: IreneAthena, littlereddot
  210. @mcohen

    有见地。 作为一个生活在乌克兰的塔斯马尼亚人,你很接近,但当然,袋狼已经被认为已经灭绝了 85 年,所以那里没有真正的危险,而不是有袋动物。 您展示的拼贴画中没有德系犹太人,这些犹太人以当地人为代价将自己强加于巴勒斯坦。

  211. @littlereddot

    Because real people do not actually live in your mind rent free or “curse God’s plan”.

    How could an omnipotent Deity possibly go wrong? Anything that happens IS the plan!

    Palestine was not “given” to anyone, and this narrow sliver of land was virtually empty 150 years ago. It got subsequently populated when somebody felt the urge or the push.

    The whole thing is a delusional fantasy in your mind, a literal figment of the imagination. Come down from the clouds and try living the real world instead. There is no “they”, there are no “Jews”, there is no such thing as “motivations”, and people breathe air.

    Amazing NEWS

  212. @Showmethereal

    Biblical prophecy says [that] will only happen when their back is against the wall and they have nowhere else to turn to.

    Thus an ingathering must first take place, and so it will, does and shall. Nobody can have their backs to any walls without being close to that wall at some point.

    Two Things to Learn Today:

    太空

    &

    时间

    • 回复: @Showmethereal
  213. @Fart Blossom

    Ok. I see that some are all butt hurt about the quote. Of course it “has” to be fake as in many other things that make the usual suspects look as bad as they are.

    这一切听起来都是真的,所以你们中的任何人都可以在此基础上攻击它吗?

    例如,你们中有人能否认有关银行家的部分吗?

    Since you cannot, here’s something else for you to gnash your teeth over.

    在派对上,我开始看到许多不同的人。 在战争期间,我看到了机会主义和自私如何吞噬了许多同志。 他们穿着昂贵的衣服,住在漂亮的公寓里,在有钱人提供的地方度过长假。 其中一个是党的前财务主管威廉·维纳,他是数十家企业的操纵者,他穿着布鲁克斯兄弟的西装,抽着昂贵的雪茄,只在最好的地方吃午饭。

    -贝拉·多德(Bella Dodd),《黑暗学院》,第11章

  214. @simple mind

    Palestine was “virtually empty”. Perfect description of your own mind.

    • 回复: @simple mind
  215. @The_MasterWang

    I disagree with your extremism oftentimes … But yeah it was absolutely a message to the world that they chose a transgender “person” to represent Taiwan at thag silly democraxy forum. It was disgusting. But to show there is some sanity – The “person” was actually just turned down after that debacle – from speaking in South Korea. The propaganda organization AFP (source for the Channel News Asia story below) of course tried to make it look like a bad thing.

    https://www.channelnewsasia.com/asia/taiwan-protests-south-korea-disinvites-digital-minister-conference-2393226

  216. @simple mind

    Ok well as long as you keep your silly politics out of it then… The Arabs and the Iranians arent the problem then. Secularism is the problem in Israel and until that is solved there will still be stumbling. Man made solutions will only bring more heartache – no matter how good the agricultural technology is (do you believe that is the miracle of prophecy?? Since when is mans efforts a miracle???)

  217. @Fart Blossom

    https://www.marxists.org/archive/trotsky/1920/terrcomm/ch04.htm

    Try the actual words of the old man himself… takes some reading skill, attention span.

  218. @Fart Blossom

    那个虚构的报价肯定不正确。 一方面,它以犹太复国主义为特色的突出地位绝对是 1948 年后时代的产物。 在 20 世纪早期的几十年里,无论政治倾向如何,大多数犹太人都简单地将犹太复国主义视为一条有前途的道路。 特别是托洛茨基在 1940 年拒绝了犹太复国主义者的邀请,要求他搬到巴勒斯坦并加入那里的犹太人定居点,以躲避斯大林的格柏乌。 托洛茨基重申他拒绝犹太复国主义,当时他受到了短暂的友好欢迎,而世界其他大部分地区都试图通过拒绝斯大林的难民身份来容纳斯大林,这表明他不会在那里发表声明。

    贝拉·多德 (Bella Dodd) 的钻头具有不同的性质。 在 1930 年代和 40 年代,当时共产国际提倡“反法西斯联盟”,她参与了 CPUSA。 当时,一些参与新政的富裕商人欢迎 CPUSA 作为合作伙伴,正是因为莫斯科的路线是 CPUSA 不应该在美国进行革命,而应该培养盟友以希特勒为主要敌人。 托洛茨基在 SWPUSA 的追随者于 1941 年 XNUMX 月被罗斯福政府起诉,因为他们遵循托洛茨基的路线,即第二次世界大战是帝国主义间的战争,而不是共产国际声称的反法西斯十字军东征。 但没有理由怀疑多德在那段时间可能看到一些 CPUSA 成员得到了舒适的待遇。

  219. frankie p 说:
    @The_MasterWang

    习近平和中共比你们理性得多,这让我很受鼓舞。中共将继续谋求和平统一台湾,这对中国有利。请记住,中共视台湾人民为中国人,党无意杀中国人。我对台湾很多过分的同性恋/跨性别胡说八道感到震惊,包括不断宣传那个奇怪的人,没有职务的部长唐凤(唐凤)。这种民进党策略不是台湾人民的代表。你所说的台湾是万劫不复的说法是夸大其词;台湾是一个非常复杂的地方,随着时间的推移,随着地缘政治和经济现实变得更加清晰,岛上政治很可能会发生微妙的变化。

    你和这个网站上的其他亲中国的专家经常被认为是极端的,我敢说,非常不像中国人。 事实上,你们中的许多人,虽然有中国式的手柄,但在你的观点、傲慢和对好战的支持方面给人的印象是非常西方的。

    我相信习近平和中共的几点:

    他们无意攻打台湾; 他们会耐心等待并明白时间在他们这边。 美国正在内爆,允许它这样做将解决问题。

    他们不想消灭美国,西方,白人等等。你和像你这样的人的一些评论是如此精神错乱,就像一些宣扬对华战争的卑鄙美国人一样精神错乱,就像炸弹三峡谷大坝邪恶的生物。 不要像他们一样!

    中国令人钦佩,因为它要促进中国人民的福祉,要与其他国家进行贸易,并不断进步。 中共无意“统治世界”,也无意取代美国成为全球霸主。

  220. @frankie p

    China has an ancient civilization while America has yet to reach that status, being still in training-pants and barely out of diapers. Though many educated Chinese are likely to be at least tangentially aware of Thomas Jefferson and Abraham Lincoln, how many Americans are anything but clueless when it comes to Lao Tze or Kung Fu Tze. Perhaps I’m somewhat misspelling those names, but the identification should be reasonably clear.

    Some years ago on the internet I encountered an 8th grade graduation test given to Kansas 13 year-olds. After reviewing the questions, it struck me that perhaps I could barely have passed that ca. 1906 test. My impression is that the majority of Americans holding PHD’s could NOT have passed it. Financed by the likes of the Rottenfeller Crime Clan and others of like mind, “educationists” such as John Dewey and James Bryant Conant, highly influential in schools of education in colleges and universities across the land, because of their status with the Ed. School at Columbia University in New York; determined that average Americans did not need to learn Latin, Greek and calculus, as their only usefulness to the elite would be to work in their factories and provide food from their farms.

    所以我要和你说的重点是,100 多年来,美国人民被故意愚弄了,基本上是 XNUMX 代人。当高中体育对机构和社区比历史、地理和艺术更重要时;任何聪明的观察者都应该清楚,美国人被故意变成了一个新的农奴阶层。在技​​术和科学上,许多美国学院和大学都保持着很高的标准,但是当普通美国人对职业足球的了解超过公民的职责时,共和国内的整个公民概念就变得可笑了。

    Mourn for America. It’s people have long been misguided and misgoverned by its elites.

  221. d dan 说:
    @frankie p

    “记住,中共视台湾人为中国人,中共无意杀害中国人。 ”

    那么,台湾人也应该受到中国法律的约束。 记住:

    1. 中国极端腐败被判处死刑。 现在台湾的一些政治暴徒已经接近或超过腐败的门槛,我不会感到惊讶。

    2. 叛国罪也判处死刑。 同样,许多都非常接近该阈值。

    3.如果两方不幸爆发战争,不管是哪一方挑起的,台湾现任和前任领导人很多也应该被判处死刑。 那是因为台湾有很多和平统一的机会。 为战争而死的士兵,需要台湾领导人讨回公道。

    4.不要忘记协助或引发战争的外国人也应该受到适当的惩罚。

    最起码,大部分暴徒应该被长期监禁,而不是被允许带着家人和贪污钱逃往西方,继续成为西方邪恶势力的反华工具。

    我认为上述任何陈述都不应被视为“极端”,而只是常识性的正义和公平。

    • 回复: @frankie p
    , @Showmethereal
  222. antibeast 说:
    @Showmethereal

    You’re correct in that the Zionists made a big mistake in misusing the biblical prophecy about the gathering of the Jewish diaspora in a newly-created State of Israel in Palestine. If the goal is to establish a ‘Jewish’ State, then the current secular State of Israel is too ‘Western’ to be considered ‘Jewish’ by the religious standards of Orthodox Judaism. So obviously, the Zionists based their political ideology on the Western concept of a ‘Nation-State’ for the Jewish diaspora, without considering the theological implications of their political project of establishing a ‘national home’ for the Jewish diaspora in Palestine.

    Their second mistake is to rely on the British to promise the Zionists a ‘national home’ in Palestine as expressed in the Balfour Declaration. If the Zionists had instead relied on the 1947 UN Mandate to establish a ‘national home’ for the Jewish diaspora after WWII, then the newly-created State of Israel would not have been seen as a purely political project to ‘colonize’ Palestine with Ashkenazi Jewish settlers from Europe but as an international ‘humanitarian’ mission to resettle Ashkenazi Jewish refugees fleeing from Nazi persecution in Europe as well as the Misrahim Jews and Sephardic Jews expelled from Arab lands in the Middle East and North Africa, respectively.

    If the Arabs then decided to reject the 1947 UN Mandate by starting a war of conquest against the newly-created State of Israel, then that would have been seen as an act of aggression against the Jewish refugees resettled in Israel instead of an anti-colonial war to ‘liberate’ Palestine from Ashkenazi Jewish colonists from Europe.

    The third mistake the Zionists committed was to ‘expel’ the Arabs from their ancestral homes in Palestine instead of ‘paying’ them to move to the Arab areas designated by the 1947 UN Mandate. That would have been a better solution even if the newly-created State of Israel had an Arab majority as it would have avoided the ‘original sin’ of Nakba which would taint the founding of the State of Israel forever.

    As it were, Palestinian Arabs became Stateless refugees living in squalor all over the Levant while Israeli Jews became homo rights activists organizing LGBT gay pride parades in Tel Aviv which is an affront not only to Muslim Arabs but to Levantine Christians and Orthodox Jews as well.

    • 回复: @littlereddot
    , @showmethereal
  223. @simple mind

    is a delusional fantasy in your mind,

    LOL. What conclusions you jump to.

    why do you think I preface my question with “in Bible parlance”?

    You really need to improve your reading comprehension.

  224. @Showmethereal

    People like him only use the bible for convenience in their politics.

    Yes, he tries, but he is pretty incoherent at that too. It is hard to find honesty or rigour in his statements.

    He just cherry picks things that to him seem to support his favourite point of view, at the particular juncture in the argument. Nevermind that it contradicts itself further along.

    But I do admit I enjoy observing his arguments. I see it as symptomatic of what is going wrong with Western society these days….ie. the belief that everybody is entitled to have their own point of view (stemming from the dogma of freedom of speech and all that stuff), nevermind if one has never bothered to examine if his point of view is valid or not.

  225. @antibeast

    I have a hunch that the current situation with Israel cannot last much longer.

    It seems clear to me that the West cannot defeat a combined Russia and China either militarily or economically. Now with Iran thrown into the entente, it appears the power situation in the Levant will now move against Israel and its sponsor USA.

    To me the question is whether Tel Aviv will see the writing on the wall (how ironic to use this expression as it is biblical afterall), and compromise with a two state solution, or risk being run off the land entirely should Iran eventually become the dominant power in the Levant.

    Again it is ironic to me that three millenia after the Persians freed the Jews from captivity in Babylon and restored Israel, a latter day Persia might scatter the Jews from Israel once again.

    I guess that is what one gets if one bites the hand that fed you millenia ago.

    • 回复: @antibeast
    , @Showmethereal
  226. Lurker 说:
    @simple mind

    When did you people invent anything?

    I’m sure the bagel was ripped off from others.

  227. frankie p 说:
    @d dan

    你就是不明白,丹,没关系。 因为习近平和中共确实明白。 你的发言缺乏对中国/台湾问题背景的微妙或尊重。 再一次,我很高兴习近平在掌权,而不是你。 你的陈述不仅仅是极端的——它们是极端的胡说八道。

    你否认我的报价吗? “中共视台湾人民为中国人,中共无意杀害中国人。 ”

    中共视台湾人民为中国人,但同时也深知这些中国人从未在中华人民共和国的政治控制或法律制度之下。

    他们的目标是让双方重聚。 他们的目标不是以腐败和叛国罪判处在台中国人和外国人死刑。

    中共将采取有利于台湾中国人民的战略,如果他们想在中国生活/学习/投资/开公司,会给他们带来经济繁荣的机会。

    你的描述也像西方媒体和机构描述中国时最糟糕的。 “暴徒”、“邪恶势力”等都是用来形容中国的,在这里你也一样。

    我很高兴中国有更酷的负责人。

    只是在说'

    • 同意: Showmethereal
    • 回复: @Showmethereal
    , @d dan
  228. @Showmethereal

    Any solution not extreme is compromise and self-deception, an irresponsible act of kicking the can down the road. Rational people follow logic. Logic inevitably leads to extremes.

  229. @frankie p

    I am not “pro-China”. If there’s any better alternative regime to the CCP I will support it and if there’s any way to avoid state of existence of slavery under the Anglo-Judeo gender non-binary soy goy farm I will advocate for it.

    My observation leads me to believe the path of liberation lies in the undoing of the West and the utter annihilation of all our racial enemies. I don’t care what crimes must be committed to secure the existence of our people and a future for our children. Even if it means dashing their babies against the stones, as the Bible says. I will try to enjoy the process.

    是的,我认为中共软弱胆小。

  230. animalogic 说:
    @Fart Blossom

    同意“法西斯主义”是一个用尽的术语(一群有用的白痴“反法”)。
    顺便说一句——“也许变态的富豪统治更好。” 是一个绕口令的地狱!!

  231. @Showmethereal

    You do realize behind that beautiful creature there is a culture of woke in Taiwan? They are now a nation ready to die for “democracy” and the right for penis-ed people to become pregnant. They have chosen dehumanization. They have chosen to become beautiful creatures of soy. Also remember the soy creatures and the 1488ers are both mortal enemies of ours.

  232. @frankie p

    但你说我有西方观点是对的。 毕竟,我是西方教育的产物。

    I would like to think I am humble person, no better or worse than the enemy. I respect the enemy by meeting hatred with hatred. They tell me they want to kill us. I promise to throw their children into crushers. I don’t “take the high road”. I treat them as the same earthy creatures subject to blind force of natural selection. They want us to believe they are on a higher plane of existence, unique in all of creation. I tell them they will be convinced of the equality of creation when we show them there is no God and make niggers out of them.

    • 回复: @frankie p
  233. frankie p 说:
    @The_MasterWang

    得到帮助。

    “他们告诉我他们想杀了我们。”
    谁是“他们”,谁是“我们”?

    你有某种执着于对孩子施暴的欲望。 得到帮助。

    “我想我是个谦虚的人……”
    鉴于您的评论,这是一个非常荒谬的说法。

    “他们希望我们相信他们处于更高的存在层面,”
    “他们”到底是谁?

    “当我们向他们展示没有上帝并把他们变成黑鬼时。”
    “我们”是谁? 你要如何向任何人表明没有上帝?
    当你在这里使用“黑鬼”时,你是在暗示奴隶吗?

    我很高兴你把胆汁洒了。你已经照亮了丑陋的自己。

    得到帮助。

    • 回复: @The_MasterWang
    , @Sisifo
  234. antibeast 说:
    @littlereddot

    The two-State solution is finished as there has been too much bad blood in the Arab-Israeli conflict which subsided only because the Ashkenazi Jews in the City of London/Wall Street bribed the Arabs with the Petrodollar deal. But the Arabs are highly irrational as proven by their medieval tribalism. So nobody knows what they’ll do after their oil wealth runs out.

    Iran is a latecomer to the Arab-Israeli conflict as it had recognized Israel as early as the days of Mossadegh who was overthrown in a CIA/MI6 coup. The West then reinstalled the Shah who was in turn overthrown by Ayatollah Khomeini in the Iranian Revolution which ushered in the Islamic Republic of Iran. That’s when the animosity towards Israel started which has lasted to this day.

    The Iranians are far more rational than the Arabs who are very much into Saudi Wahhabism. The secular Iranians would have been much better off under the Socialist Mossadegh than under the Shah which would have precluded the rise of Islamic Fundamentalism in Iran. That in turn would have allowed Israel to maintain close and friendly ties to Iran as a counterweight to Arab medieval tribalism which is still wrecking the region today.

    The Islamic Fundamentalists have a problem accepting the existence of the State of Israel not the secular Iranians who remember how the Achaeminid Persians under Cyrus the Great liberated the Jews and rebuilt the Second Temple in Jerusalem. That’s why I think deposing Mossadegh was a big mistake because Iran would have turned into a Socialist Republic which would have acted as a regional power to counter Arab hegemony in the region. But the Cold Warriors didn’t want any of that Socialist stuff as they were hellbent on destroying Soviet Communism. That’s why the West instrumentalized Islamic Fundamentalism against Soviet Communism, first in Iran and later in Afghanistan, which has come back to haunt the State of Israel today.

  235. @frankie p

    还是徒劳。 仍然瞄准道德制高点。

    Of course I don’t really want to murder their children. Not a good tactic. Better to ruin them. But the Jews have already accomplished that. I mean it as a metaphor. Something along the line of “utterly destroying their future.”

    当你对人类生存的条件有了正确的理解时,你就会理解我。 但你做你。

  236. @d dan

    Look at what just happened withthe Taliban… Russia and China told them to tone down their rhetoric. The Taliban even offered amnesty to military personell. So the CPC are not going to take extreme steps. Yes they are now sanctioning separatists economically – but threatening sith the death penalty for treason is a no go… Come on – not even Jimmy Lai who is a blatant traitor and colluder with the US (all connected wkth DPP authrorities in Taiwan) is being threatened with the death penalty. He has been sentenced to jail time in Hong Kong – but penalties are not the same for the mainland. In fact it has upheld One Country Two Systems. What you are proposing actually would go against that.
    军事冲突当然是另一回事。

    • 回复: @d dan
  237. @littlereddot

    Honestly I do not believe Russia and China would permit Iran to do that. I dont speak Farsi – so I wont pretend to understand if that would be the Iranian intention either. I do know western media isnt trustworthy though. But I reserve judgement. The Jewish people will always exist — but as to what happens with this current “state” – I make no judgement. But it obviously isnt going to work the way it is.

  238. @frankie p

    To your comment about strategies… Well thag has been happening. It really went into earnest between 2008 amd 2016. That was why the US and Tokyo and the DPP helped the Sunflower Movement. If you look at the 2019 riots in Hong Kong – they attempted to use the same exact method… They just couldn’t hold on to the Legco building.
    But there are many Taiwanese already making the most of opportunities and in some cases Taiwanese have more open opportunities on the Mainland than Mainland born people. There was even a delegation of Taiwan students who study on the Mainland who got a group tour of all the Winter Olympics facilities. Many of them noted other youngsters from the island should spend time on the Mainland. But that is exactly what the DPP and Washington dont want. Many realize when they visit they have been lied to…
    但是,是的,台湾人几乎已经拥有了全部权利。 在Covid期间,他们有在大陆接种疫苗的特殊权利。
    All in all – I agree with you…

  239. d dan 说:
    @frankie p

    你否认我的报价吗? “中共视台湾人民为中国人,中共无意杀害中国人。 ”

    正是因为我同意那个说法——这就是为什么我认为台湾人应该在行为和法律方面被当作中华人民共和国公民对待。

    “你的陈述不仅仅是极端的——它们是极端的胡说八道。”

    我实际上认为你是一个巨魔,光顾,没有实质内容。 你没有争论或反驳我的任何陈述。 举些例子:

    1. 你认为台湾人要享受中国人的所有特权,应该遵守中国的法律吗?

    2、你是否否认“领导人”中存在极端腐败和叛国行为?

    我相信事实站在我这边。 你说话居高临下,谴责与你意见不同的人。

    极其傲慢的人。

    • 回复: @frankie p
  240. d dan 说:
    @Showmethereal

    “他在香港被判入狱”

    其实我觉得黎智英受到的对待太宽容了。 他应该受到更严厉的惩罚——这部分是香港制度的缺陷(即它是一个“错误”而不是“功能”)。 这是否是死刑——我不知道。

    “你的提议实际上会与此背道而驰。 军事冲突当然是另一回事。”

    我们可以谈谈战略和战术。 我相信,当台湾的一些暴徒宣布“终生追责”时,北京正在考虑对他们采取严厉的行动。 北京也在争论“北京模式”与“天津模式”——1949年两个不同城市的解放策略(你可能知道我在说什么?)

    大陆内部有很多声音,争论着推动和平统一的不同方法和途径。 强大的威慑和严重的威胁应该是一种选择——如果你不想太死板的话。 我赞成更严厉的惩罚,因为这实际上减少了战争和流血的机会。

    我知道,这是违反直觉的。 幸运的是,北京有比弗兰基更聪明的人。

    • 回复: @showmethereal
  241. frankie p 说:
    @d dan

    与您沟通非常令人沮丧,因为尽管我们在许多问题上达成一致,但您似乎认为您的意见是事实。 你继续无视中国/台湾局势的现状和历史,你对待事情的态度好像台湾人已经是中国的一部分。 醒来; 他们不是。 关键是:在文化上成为中国人和在政治上成为中国人,即成为中华人民共和国公民,有着巨大的区别。

    有几件事你需要了解。首先,作为中国人并不需要遵守中华人民共和国的法律。例如,家族在法国、美国、马来西亚或新加坡生活了几代,在本国拥有公民身份但在中国没有公民身份的中国人,没有义务遵守或尊重中国的法律.我知道中共已经通过法律试图控制这些人的行为和思想,特别是如果他们在本国成为反对中华人民共和国的活动家。我也明白,如果这些人继续对中共和中华人民共和国进行活动,然后访问中华人民共和国,他们很有可能会被中华人民共和国的安全机构抓起来,并作为中国公民受审。我强烈反对中国的这一战略,这将导致未来的问题。我进一步相信,成为反共活动分子的其他国家的中国人对此是明智的,不会访问中国,包括香港。

    1. 你认为台湾人要享受中国人的所有特权,应该遵守中国的法律吗?

    这是一个有趣的问题,但我不认为这是习近平和中共花很多时间思考的问题。 原因是现实。 习近平和中共正在努力说服台湾人民回归祖国。 我觉得他们已经决定,在实现这一目标方面,胡萝卜比大棒更有效。 Showmethereal 发表评论 (246) 关于中共如何为希望在中国生活/学习/经商的台湾人提供激励措施。 台湾人有机会享受比中国公民更多的特权。 这些政策有明确的目标; 随着越来越多的台湾人在中国拥有利益,他们的经济福利依赖于中国,他们将支持统一。 这是软实力,中国有足够的资源来部署它。 我同意这项政策。 就个人而言,我的孩子,美国和台湾(中华民国)公民,将有幸在中国学习或创业。 我不赞同中国和中华人民共和国是某种应该避免的邪恶的说法。 许多台湾人也有同感; 他们能够看到逻辑,避免跳入某些想要看到中国和台湾保持分离的利益集团进行的情感媒体游戏。 Covid-19 大流行大大降低了台湾人从事此类商业/教育/居住机会的能力,但我相信他们会在 2022 年大流行平息后回归。总之,中国希望回归“叛徒省份”他们愿意通过激励措施直接吸引人们。 整体策略不错。

    2、你是否否认“领导人”中存在极端腐败和叛国行为?

    世界上几乎每个国家的“领导人”都存在极度腐败,即使是中国,尽管我同意这种腐败比我的国家美国要少,那里的“领导人”和制度完全腐败。

    台湾的“领导人”没有叛国罪,因为他们必须将自己视为中华人民共和国的一部分,才能认为自己叛国。再次记住历史:这些人从未受过中华人民共和国的管辖或有义务遵守其法律。今天的当权者甚至对国民党都非常不满,将他们视为使用武力控制台湾的局外人(外国人)。我看到这种情况的复杂性,虽然我不同意民进党及其坚持台湾人民不是中国人的说法,但我理解他们来自哪里。既然我说了没有叛国罪,那就更重要的是,双方要通过共同的利益和利益走到一起。我想中共的领导层明白这一点。我不像我们的朋友王大师那样认为中共是软弱的,是一个可以被更民族主义的替代品取代的政党。对我来说这很荒谬。我觉得中共在追求中华民族的美好未来时,是按照一个涉及主权和民族主义的计划。我非常钦佩这个计划,并希望我的国家能够恢复它。

    我不在优越的位置说话。 当人们不同意你的观点时,你会过度敏感。 我不谴责你,只是你的想法。 我的目标是看到中国和台湾达成让双方都满意的协议。 我的目标是看到台湾避免成为美国遏制中国崛起的工具,这是一个没有希望的目标。 我的目标是和平和解。 叫我嚣张,我不在乎。

    • 谢谢: showmethereal
    • 回复: @d dan
    , @Mulga Mumblebrain
  242. @antibeast

    To your last paragraph I would note more confusion. The holiday Hanukah just ended a few days ago. The whole point of the holiday was originally to symbolize the resistance of becoming westernized by withstanding conversion into the Greek way of life…. Yet this modern iteration considers Israel to be a “western nation”. It’s a lot of confusion.

    • 回复: @antibeast
  243. @d dan

    That is fine to believe Jimmy Lai has gotten off too easy. I find him to be a disgusting human being. But that doesn’t change the fact that Hong Kong is guaranteed to have it’s own court system (and penalties) until 2047. The Hong Kong system is indeed flawed…. But the CPC is choosing to honor it’s commitment and only tweak the system to serve national security.

    As to military option… Come on – even most of the military on Taiwan knows any fight would be over very quickly. The issue would be the aftermath of the US and Japan and Australia trying to blockade China’s civilian shipping. That is what China’s deterrence build up is about. The island wouldn’t stand much chance. Everyone knows that. Let’s be honest – it is the US who stops the DPP from trying to declare independence outright – because deep down the US doesn’t really want to have to fight China again.

    But that said… hong kong and macao people don’t have to abide by the same law – so expecting taiwan to is just not realistic. 50 years was chosen in hong kong and macao as a sort of “breaking in” period. The young should mature in that time.

  244. Sisifo 说:
    @Mefobills

    好解释。

    As a form of govern, Fascism or National Socialism are theoretically much better for the average citizen, and countries like Germany, Italy and even Spain flourished under those systems.

    In my opinion, China is actually much more fascist than communist, at least when you properly understand the terms.

    Then of course there was war, first declared by the Jews on Germany, then on the field. The rest is history, and we know who gets to write history…

    • 谢谢: Mefobills
    • 回复: @Mulga Mumblebrain
  245. Sisifo 说:
    @mcohen

    塔斯马尼亚虎,印度太平洋最危险的捕食者

    塔斯马尼亚虎可能和狐狸一样危险,你是说它比鳄鱼和鲨鱼更危险吗?

    • 回复: @Mulga Mumblebrain
  246. @Sisifo

    And there were REAL tigers in Java and Sumatra, and don’t mess with a Komodo dragon.

    • 同意: Showmethereal
  247. @Sisifo

    Sisifo, you are suffering from Orientalism, and applying Western terms to a very different civilization. China might have elements of Legalism, the closest Chinese ideology to Western fascism that I know of, but it has many more features of Confucian, Daoist, Buddhist and Maoist practises.

    • 回复: @Sisifo
  248. d dan 说:
    @frankie p

    你和 showmethereal 都没有意识到拥有更多的力量来推动和平统一是绝对必要的。 你可以谈论所有你想要的胡萝卜。 它已经有 50 年没有奏效,而且再过 100 年也不会奏效。 中国目前的问题在于,有太多与台湾(以及日本和西方)企业和金钱相关的特殊利益。

    幸运的是,有证据表明北京的一些人更愿意对台湾“领导人”进行更严厉的惩罚。 这将是比堆积更多胡萝卜和避免潜在战争更有效的策略。 我不(你也不知道)知道习近平个人支持哪一方。 但是你一直说话好像习告诉了你什么——所以我一定是错的。 我觉得这很光顾。

    但我很感谢你花时间在最后一条评论中解释你的观点。 但是,你混淆了很多东西,我没有时间回复它们。 所以只会记录我的不同意见。

    • 回复: @Showmethereal
    , @antibeast
  249. @frankie p

    A compradore traitor to China is a menace. The type of creature that would prefer being Western to being Chinese, ought to move to paradises on Earth like the USA and UK, and cease trying to destroy their own cultural homeland. If they continue, the PRC is entitled to defend itself from these odious traitors. Hong Kong was a tough nut, because it has been full of compradores, traitors, enemies of China and wannabe Westernised Oriental Gentlemen for nearly 200 years, and subject to enormous Western subversive pressures. It is GOOD that China is cleaning out that rats’ nest.

  250. @d dan

    Since you mentioned me I will interject…

    I personally dont see the strategy as piling up more carrots to avoid war. How did the CPC supplant the KMT in the civil war…?? It did so by gaining the support of the rural peasants and offering amnesty for KMT soldiers who defected. Chiang had to flee because much of his military no longer wanted to fight for him. The strategy that won wasnt to threaten death on everyone. In fact – trying to wipe out the CPC rather than fight Japan was what turned many people against Chiang. Everyone already knows IF a war starts what would happen. the CPC is righfully sanctioning any Taiwan business that supports separatism… But it would be very unwise to threaten the company leaders with the death penalty for treason. That would completely turn international opinion against China – and I dont mean the 5 Eyes and the EU. I am talking about countries like Panama and the Dominican Republic and the handful of others who have switched diplomatic ties from the ROC to the PRC in the past few years. They did so because they believe what the CPC says of the goal of peaceful reunification with war as a last resort.

    Deng told Thatcher to her face that China would not accept British presence in Hong Kong and if she refused to negotiate then he would march back in and take it. She correctly told him that he would turn goodwill against him. But he was willing to take the risk. Why? There was an internationally recognized date where the lease on the New Territories was up. Of course Hong Kong island and Kowloon couldnt function anymore without the New Territories…. So the Brits came to their senses. The difference is there is no recognized date to end the Taiwan question. So the CPC has to be wise as to how it plays its cards or it will fall into the trap the US has set.

    I firmly am for offering separatists free passage to go live in the US and Japan… But threatening the death penalty is not the way to end a civil war that is currently “cold”. Everyone knows the red lines and if they are crossed then it doesnt need to be stated what would be done. Japan if it dared to stick its nose it should absolutely be resolutely dealt with… But in that case China should NOT be inhumane like the Americans and ruthlessly flatten Tokyo (which killed more civilians than Nagasaki or Hiroshima) and other civilian populations. Then China would be no different than the Americans. Is that your standard???

    • 回复: @d dan
  251. antibeast 说:
    @showmethereal

    Here’s a video documentary on how British ‘double-dealing’ encouraged Arab nationalism while patronizing Israeli Zionism which ended with the British backstabbing the Arab nationalists and abandoning the Israeli Zionists, leading to the Arab-Israeli conflict.

    And yes, the original goal of the Zionists was to create a ‘national homeland’ for Jews to practice Judaism, safe and free from religious persecution. But Israelis today are confused as to what exactly is the cultural identity of Israel — ‘Western Liberalism’ or ‘Jewish State’?

    • 回复: @Showmethereal
    , @Malla
    , @Malla
    , @Malla
  252. antibeast 说:
    @d dan

    没有必要使用武力或暴力来统一台湾与中国,因为自 2015 年新加坡习马峰会以来,宣布“台湾独立”(TI)的窗口已经关闭。 这一历史性事件决定了所谓的“TI 运动”的命运,该运动后来沦为小丑表演。

    绝大多数台湾人不会允许民进党与中国对抗,从而破坏台湾,正如其推动 TI 的失败尝试所证明的那样。 由于民进党的分裂策略,台湾从内部内爆,时间站在中国一边。 大多数台湾人关心面包和黄油问题,而不是民进党宣传的美国和日本支持的愚蠢的反华狗屎。 除了廉价的宣传点外,民进党在阻止台湾与中国不可避免的统一方面无能为力。

    我觉得你读了太多西方的 agitprop。 看看香港,看看在香港暴徒摧毁自己的城市和自己的事业时保持冷静是多么值得。 同样的事情也发生在民进党身上。 让他们射自己的船,这样他们就会自己沉下去。

    • 同意: Showmethereal
  253. @antibeast

    Ok thanks – I will check it out…. But “British double dealing”…??? That is so typical you dont even need to write the last two words….sadly

  254. Malla 说:
    @antibeast

    英国的“双重交易”如何鼓励阿拉伯民族主义,同时光顾以色列的犹太复国主义,最终英国背刺阿拉伯民族主义者并抛弃以色列犹太复国主义者,导致阿以冲突。

    This video is pure bullshit and it is the usual ‘blame Anglo’ low quality videos which come on shitty brain destroying channels like ‘Al-Jazeera’ or ‘History Channel’. The truth is Britain was put in a difficult position by Zionist forces who wanted to use the British Empire as a convenient tool to get Palestine. Also the shitty League of Nations (United Nations of that time) who actually backstabbed Palestinians by sneakily violating their own laws. What is not mentioned in such low grade videos is that the Balfour Declaration was not ratified by the British parliament and was thrown out by the House of Lords as too ridiculous and in violation against the promises given to Arabs.

    我们
    直到 1915 年,巴勒斯坦仍处于土耳其帝国的统治之下,这使得阿拉伯人在第一次世界大战的第一阶段为土耳其人而战。 在课堂中
    of events, however, a series of letters was addressed to the Sherif Hussein of Mecca by Sir Henry MacMahon, the High Commissioner for Egypt, in the name of the British Government, promising the Arabs their independence if they would fight on the side of the Allies. Appeals addressed ” To the Arab officers and soldiers in the Turkish Army in Palestine ” were also conveyed to the Arabs themselves by means of leaflets thrown from British aeroplanes by British officers, calling on them to come over to the Allies and win their freedom for which Great Britain was fighting together with the Sherif. The Arabs deserted from the Turkish armies enmasse and entered the War on the side of the British.

    与此同时,一个完全不同的计划正在某些领先的犹太人及其自由派盟友的头脑中成熟——一个犹太巴勒斯坦的旧犹太复国主义计划。 早在 25 年 1915 月 XNUMX 日, Lord Bertie recorded in his diary that the Baron Edmond de Rothschild and a Russian Jew had approached him about what he considered ” an absurd scheme,” which they represented as having the approval of Lord Grey, Mr. Lloyd George, Sir Herbert Samuel and Lord Crewe : It contemplates the formation of Palestine into an Israelite State, under the protectorate of England, France or Soviet Russia, preferably of England.’

    伯蒂勋爵清楚地预见到了同盟国和基督教会之间的这种安排必然引起的所有复杂情况,但由于阿拉伯人仍然
    在土耳其人一边战斗,他们权利的更严重的复杂性尚未进入问题。

    三天后,即 28 年 1915 月 XNUMX 日,时任首相的阿斯奎斯先生(后来的牛津勋爵)在他的日记中记录,赫伯特爵士也提出了同样的计划
    Samuel in the form of a memorandum headed ” The Future of Palestine.”
    牛津勋爵似乎认为它不亚于伯蒂勋爵的奇妙。

    然而,犹太复国主义者推行了他们的计划,该计划最终不是在迄今为止一直支持它的自由党的支持下发起的,而是以一位领先的保守党政治家的名义发起的。 2 年 1917 月 XNUMX 日,贝尔福先生(后来的勋爵)被说服在以他的名字命名的著名宣言上签名,该宣言的形式为 给犹太勋爵罗斯柴尔德的一封信,说明:

    “国王陛下政府赞成在巴勒斯坦为犹太人建立民族家园,并将尽最大努力促进实现这一目标,明确理解不得采取任何可能损害公民和宗教信仰的行为。巴勒斯坦现有非犹太社区的权利或犹太人在任何其他国家享有的权利和政治地位。”

    巴尔福勋爵 在签署本宣言时,由于他对生活实际事务的哲学超脱, 从来没有听说过给阿拉伯人的麦克马洪誓言。

    • 回复: @Patrick McNally
    , @antibeast
  255. Malla 说:
    @antibeast

    On November 7, 1918, Lord Allenby, then in command of the British Army in Palestine, had the following Proclamation posted up in every village throughout the country :

    “The War … is to assure the complete and final liberation of the people so long oppressed by the Turks and the establishment of national governments and administrations deriving their authority from the initiative and free desire of the native population. They are far from wishing to impose any form of Government on the people against their will. As the population of Palestine at this date comprised 90 per cent, of Arabs it was clear that this could only mean that the administration of the country was to be in the hands of the Arabs as promised by Sir Henry MacMahon’s Declaration three years earlier. “

    But in spite of these two pledges the plan of a Jewish National Home was pursued by the Zionists and their friends, and a draft scheme was placed before the Peace Conference by the Zionist Organisation on February 7, 1919. The way for this had been prepared in America. As the Memrah Journey, a Jewish monthly magazine in the USA, afterwards related in its issue of February 1928 :

    The objective was not merely to maintain the esteem and willing co-operation of President Wilson himself, but to permeate every avenue of his administration and the whole British service in his country, with a friendly understanding of Zionism. … So there was no fear of the outcome of the Peace Conference. The avenues of approach had been carefully smoothed, enough Zionists were on duty in Paris to establish a ready contact wherever accurate information was needed, and every important member of the Wilson Commission had been deliberated with in New York before the Commission sailed for France. . . . Nothiag was left to chance. “

    Meanwhile the same influences were brought to bear on Mr. Lloyd George, whose entourage at this moment was largely composed of leading Jews and Zionists, amongst whom was
    Mr. Lucien Wolf, ” the man who fought for Jewish rights at Versailles ” and who was said to be in possession of all the secrets of the Foreign Office.

    However on October 19, 1919, Mr. Lloyd George, in speaking to the Trades Union Congress, said : “ The Arab forces have redeemed the pledges given to Great Britain and we should redeem our pledges.”

    Nevertheless, the demand of the Zionist Organisation that “the high contracting parties should recognise the historic title of the Jews to Palestine” was not conceded.
    contrary. Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations was framed as follows
    :

    “Certain communities formerly belonging to the Turkish Empire have reached a stage of development where their existence as independent nations can be provisionally recognised, subject to the rendering of administrative advice and assistance by a Mandatory until such times as they are able to stand alone. The wishes of these communities must be a principal consideration in the selection of the Mandatory.”

    The Balfour Declaration having been made before Great Britain became a member of the League of Nations and being inconsistent with Article 22 of the Covenant, should therefore have been considered as abrogated.
    The League of Nations thus violated its own Covenant when on July 24, 1922, it confirmed the Draft Mandate embodying the Balfour Declaration, which had been drawn up on January 5, 1921, and had not been endorsed by the British Parliament. As Mr. Stoker, a British advocate of the Arab position, pointed out : ” The Balfour Mandate never received the Parliamentary sanction of Great Britain, the only Parliamentary expression of opinion being that of the House of Lords, which voted against it.”

  256. Malla 说:
    @antibeast

    No milder term than ” breach of contract ” can be applied to the action of of Mr. Lloyd George, Lord Cecil, Lord Balfour and certain other British politicians under pressure from the Zionist Organisation — in going back on pledges to the Arabs. Then, again, the promise of self-determination, after being embodied in the League of Nations Covenant, was revoked by the League itself in confirming the Mandate in 1922. Under these circumstances it is hardly surprising that the Arabs rose in revolt and a series of disorders took place in Palestine in the spring of 1919-20, culminating in the Jaffa riots of May 1921. On September 21, 1919, Dr. Weizmann, then head of the Zionist Federation in America, stated in an address:

    We said we desired to create in Palestine such conditions political, economical and administrative, that in a given time, as short as possible, Palestine should become as Jewish as England is English, or America is American.”

    Dr. Eder, Chairman of the Zionist Commission in Jerusalem, went further still and declared :
    “There can be only one National Home in Palestine and that a Jewish one, and no equality in partnership between Jews and Arabs, but a Jewish predominance as soon as the members of that race are sufficiently increased.”

    XNUMXD压花不锈钢板 Colonial Office endeavoured to check these pretensions by sending a statement of policy to the Zionist Organisation on June 3, 1922, in which it was said :

    Unauthorised statements have been made to the effect that the purpose in view is to create a wholly Jewish Palestine. Phrases have been used such as that Palestine is to become ” as Jewish as England is English.” His Majesty’s Government regard any such expectation as impracticable and have no such aim in view, . . . They would draw attention to the fact that the terms of the Declaration referred to do not contemplate that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish national home, but that such a home should be founded in Palestine.”

    Sir William Joynson-Hicks (later Lord Brentford) voiced the opinion of many patriots, anxious that Britain should maintain her reputation for fair dealing, when he wrote in 1921 :
    The Arabs . . . decline with the utmost determination to come under Jewish rule. They see a High Commissioner a Jew, his private secretary a Jew, the head and second of the legal department . . . Jews, the head of the contract department a Jew and many more. . . . We are denying to the Arabs the right of self-determination.

    Thus a Jewish lobby in London, similar to the Jewish lobby in Washington today was responsible for forcing the British Empire to fall back on its pledge to the Arabs. In typical cunning Jewish style, palm the blame on the honest British.

  257. @Malla

    因为在 1915 年的任何时候都没有“苏维埃俄罗斯”,所以你放在那里的内容必须至少有一个小的印刷错误。

    • 回复: @showmethereal
  258. d dan 说:
    @Showmethereal

    哈哈。 你们只有维持现状的策略,却没有强行和平统一的办法,更谈不上加快进程。

    “它通过获得农村农民的支持并特赦叛逃的国民党士兵来做到这一点。 ”

    再加上对那些没有投降的威胁。

    “……以叛国罪判处死刑来威胁公司领导是非常不明智的。”

    正如我之前所说,中华人民共和国已经发出了“终身问责”的模糊威胁。 他们现在不能太具体,但是像我们这样的随意评论者应该/可以通过明确威胁更进一步来提供帮助。

    “那将彻底扭转国际舆论对中国的看法”

    那么,这将是对中国外交技巧的考验。 我相信有很多专家/律师可以很好地“包装”它(“法治”,废话,废话......和废话)。 无论如何,我们知道大多数批评者都是来自西方的伪君子(和懦夫)——他们有很多与他们打交道的经验。

    “为分裂分子提供在美国和日本生活的自由通道”

    好让他们拿着从台湾骗来的钱过日子,成为反华势力的工具,获得下一个诺贝尔“和平”奖?

    我没有时间回复其余的。 但只是总结一下我的观点:

    1. 和平统一需要政治解决,需要暴徒“领导人”的决定——无论如何与普通民众的意愿无关。 如果他们享受所有腐败的钱,根本没有动力去改变任何东西。

    2. 暴力威胁(即战争)是维持现状所必需的。 同样,它(即对“领导人”判处死刑)是推动和平统一的必要条件。

    3.现阶段不应排除任何方法和策略。 北京有比我们聪明得多的人在为他们工作。

    • 回复: @showmethereal
  259. antibeast 说:
    @Malla

    Here’s an Arab view of the events which led to the British betrayal of the Arabs:

    https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2018/4/10/how-britain-destroyed-the-palestinian-homeland

    https://interactive.aljazeera.com/aje/2016/sykes-picot-100-years-middle-east-map/

    The 1917 Balfour Declaration was just icing on the cake that was the Sykes-Picot Agreement signed one year earlier in 1916 when the British colluded with the French to divide up the Middle East as the spoils of WWI. The Arabs felt betrayed by the British who had promised them independence from Ottoman rule if they signed up to fight the Turks during WWI.

    • 回复: @Malla
  260. Sisifo 说:
    @frankie p

    “他们告诉我他们想杀了我们。”
    谁是“他们”,谁是“我们”?

    Well, most Australians to begin with, especially the ones sick with the Zionist demented oppression. They should embrace China as they (we) have a common enemy, but they are brainwashed by “conservative” leaders to hate Chinese and see them as the source of all their problems.

    I’m sure isn’t much different in USA.

    • 回复: @animalogic
    , @The_MasterWang
  261. Sisifo 说:
    @Mulga Mumblebrain

    China might have elements of Legalism, the closest Chinese ideology to Western fascism that I know of, but it has many more features of Confucian, Daoist, Buddhist and Maoist practises.

    I’m not talking about philosophy or culture, but practical governing matters.

    A state owned central bank, a strict state control on corporations’ power, ethnic pride (that’s not racism), and other aspects that are typical of a benevolent dictatorship, of which Fascism is a direct derivative.

    It wasn’t a critique, not only I believe is a superior system.to democracy, but it has proven to be very successful not only for China, but also for the Chinese people.

    • 回复: @The_MasterWang
  262. Malla 说:
    @antibeast

    Here’s an Arab view of the events which led to the British betrayal of the Arabs:

    This view is understandable but foolish. The fault lies with the Zionist organisations and their pressure on the British government, not the British themselves. My three posts have explained why. There is even more I can add about Jewish pressure from the United States on the British.
    The truth is that just like India-Pak or Cyprus, the British were stuck in between two tribal groups (in most cases who behave like thugs not ready to compromise anything) with the British stuck in between. However, in the Palestine case, the situation was even more dangerous as there were Jews living in Britain, Jews in powerful position but no Arabs. The British Empire was known for its fairness in its dealings, in protecting the weak against the big tribes. But this was possible because Britain was homogeneous and there was not much immigrants of foreign populations. But Jews were an exception. If there were no Jews in Britain or the West, such “betrayal” would never have happened. The betrayal was the result of multi-racialism, multiculturalism of its time.
    Now as multi-racialism/ multi-multiculturalism increases, the West will become even more imperialist, they will have to, there will be new internal pressures. And it will be difficult to be fair. Most of these third world populations do not have an objective view about things but have a very low IQ tribal view.
    In India, for example both Hindus and Muslims blame the British for supporting the other side more. Marxist and Hindutvas in India try to position the other side as being “British stooges”. Only that nobody in India, among the masses take the Marxists seriously anymore, they are considered a bunch of arrogant poof snob traitors, Hindutva is far more popular among the masses.

    • 回复: @antibeast
  263. animalogic 说:
    @Sisifo

    “但他们被‘保守派’领导人洗脑,憎恨中国人,并将他们视为所有问题的根源。”
    不是这个,至少……

  264. @Sisifo

    Humans are hardwired to hate other races. Inciting racial hatred is so ease and so natural people must be brainwashed and outright oppressed to prevent genocide. In light of this reality I consider all efforts to prevent war counterproductive and outright treasonous.

    War is a beautiful thing. Especially when you win.

  265. @Sisifo

    What you call fascism I call common sense when you are allowed to think freely without being constrained by semitic values imposed through manufactured social norms and peer pressure.

  266. @Patrick McNally

    That is typical… There are usually numerous… “errors”

    • 回复: @Malla
  267. @d dan

    好吧,我同意我们只需要同意就可以不同意。

    “Plus threat to those didn’t surrender” – yes – but in a hot war that goes without saying… the Chinese civil war is currently cold… Different parameters.

    “So that they can live well with money swindled from Taiwan, and become tools of anti-China evil force, and to receive the next Nobel “peace” prize?”…. But who cares??? Again – China’s audience is not the Five Eyes and Brussels. Those people will never accept a strong China. China’s audience is the Global South. The Global South actually values such acts of mercy…. You should travel more and talk to people in the Global South. It is much cheaper materially – and much more valuable geopolitically – if China offers separatists to leave – just like it is doing in Hong Kong. That is why much of the Global South signed a letter supporting China’s dealings with Hong Kong at the UN – in spite of 5 Eyes and the G7 protesting otherwise.

    1) but Beijing did begin to begin to put financial sanctions on those who support separatists… That is a good thing and I agree with… But threatening with the death penalty is not prudent.

    2) the threat of violence is always there… I mean the CPC broadcasts naval and mariner drills showing exactly what they would do… they even show the unmanned vehicles they would use to negate the use of mines and barricade that would be used to try to prevent troop landings…. Right now there are aircraft carrier group drills going on only about 400km east of Miyako in full view of the Japanese Navy (the Japanese have been taking pictures furiously and posting them)… Obviously that is to prove a point. But my point is – war is the absolute last resort…

  268. antibeast 说:
    @Malla

    The fault lies with the Zionist organisations and their pressure on the British government, not the British themselves. My three posts have explained why. There is even more I can add about Jewish pressure from the United States on the British.

    I disagree. You make it sound like the British didn’t have any agency of their own but they did start colonizing the Middle East and Central Asia during the 19th century. Destroying the dying Ottoman Empire in order to grab its remaining territories in the Levant and the Arabian Peninsula required the British to offer a deal to the Arabs while backstabbing them by colluding with the French.

    The Sykes-Picot Agreement made a mockery of the British promise to grant independence to the Arabs for their support in fighting against the Ottoman Turks during WWI. For the British, the Balfour Declaration was a concession they made in order to appease the Zionists. But the British Mandate of Palestine was just a sideshow in their quest to colonize the Middle East which caused much bitterness amongst the Arabs who then decided to support Hitler against the British during WWII. Before then, Hitler had struck a deal with the Zionists to support Jewish emigration to Palestine (as per the Haavara Agreement) in 1933.

    By 1938, the first oil discovery was made in Saudi Arabia which set off a mad scramble for control of the oil wealth of the Middle East. That in turn forced the British to suck up to the Arabs by distancing themselves from the Zionists. After the Arab-Israeli conflict subsided, the Ashkenazi Jews themselves learned to how to deal with the oil-rich Arabs by bribing them with the Petrodollar deal in exchange for US military ‘protection’ against the State of Israel.

    Now as multi-racialism/ multi-multiculturalism increases, the West will become even more imperialist, they will have to, there will be new internal pressures. And it will be difficult to be fair. Most of these third world populations do not have an objective view about things but have a very low IQ tribal view.

    I agree. The next few decades will see the US-led ‘War on Terror’ expand in size, scale and scope, both in the Third World and the Western World, and will be far more brutal and much more bloodier than the ‘wars’ in Iraq and Afghanistan. The West is now being flooded by all these Black and Brown migrants from the Third World, most of whom are tribal racists who thrive only in a ‘US vs THEM’ jungle. The Woke Whites don’t know jack shit what they’re getting themselves into by allowing all these tribal racists into their First World countries. Pretty soon, you’re going to see the West turn into a Third-World-type jungle, complete with all these tribal racists fucking and killing everyone, including the Woke Whites.

  269. Malla 说:
    @showmethereal

    Oooh..butthurt rant..like what besides that?

    • 回复: @showmethereal
  270. TedW14 说:

    I have read Fred Reed’s articles about China here at UNZ, and he is correct in his assessments. I worked in China for 7 years and it didn’t feel like a Communist country but instead much more Capitalist than we are. The Government gives you nothing. It wasn’t at all like it’s portrayed in western media or by the US Government. It was a LOT better than I expected. It’s easy to start a small business and is encouraged. There is very little crime or police presence, made possible by the culture and character of the Chinese. The cops don’t carry guns because they don’t usually need them. Being basically a Mono Culture, as the US used to be helps a lot. Diversity doesn’t work. I came back to the US in 2016 and voted for Trump but I would have no problem living in China permanently as I mostly had a blast living there. But alas, there is no immigration(Another smart move), so I may be stuck here in our declining, dysfunctional empire unless I find a Chinese wife.

  271. Malla 说:

    我不同意。 你听起来好像英国人没有自己的机构,但他们确实在 19 世纪开始殖民中东和中亚。

    As far as rivalry in between Israel and Arabs, the British had no agency, indeed the British were victims of Zionist pressure. there is much more to write on this. For example, Jews in new York picketing outside the British Consulate calling the British anti-semitic for supporting Arabs etc….
    其实你又错了,传统上保守的英国政策总是支持奥斯曼帝国,以防止俄罗斯人因为担心俄罗斯对印度的图谋而在地中海变得强大。 通常自由派(左派)总理批评奥斯曼帝国,因为它对少数民族采取残暴的做法。

    塞克斯-皮科特协定

    是的,我同意,在某种程度上,英国曾承诺退缩,但这笔交易非常复杂。 对那里的战争没有贡献的法国想要保护黎巴嫩海岸的基督教少数群体。 英国人害怕法国人离苏伊士运河如此之近。 俄罗斯要求在中东拥有土地,但俄罗斯革命结束了它。 意大利要求土地。 穆斯林完全反对任何法国的授权(更喜欢英国的授权,甚至更喜欢美国的授权),但许多基督教社区更喜欢法国的授权,甚至更喜欢英国的授权,因为他们认为英国人过于亲穆斯林。 穆斯林想要一个统一的叙利亚,包括黎巴嫩、巴勒斯坦,也许还有约旦。 英国人夹在法国人和阿拉伯人之间。 如果你愿意,我可以写下来,但在英国那个时期有一些殖民梦想被唤醒,我同意。 英国授权的美索不达米亚或伊拉克实际上是在英属印度而不是英国的指挥下,一些英国军官甚至在谈论让印度人殖民这个地方,特别是强硬的旁遮普人,他们是优秀的农业家。 但赛克斯皮科协定并没有导致英国或法国的长期殖民化。

    对于英国人来说,贝尔福宣言是他们为了安抚犹太复国主义者而做出的让步。

    That is the most important document as far as the Middle East was concerned. This was signed in return of getting the USA into the war on Britain’s side as Russia had capitulated after the fall of the Tzarist Government and many German troops were moving on the Western front. Interesting at the same time both Roosevelt and Churchill were in powerful positions on opposite side of the pond. It is believed this led to the Lusitania, getting the USA into the war false flag as well as sabotage of internal of German war efforts by Jews/leftists.

    但英国对巴勒斯坦的托管只是他们寻求殖民中东的一个小插曲

    完全不是,所谓的中东殖民化是犹太复国主义的副业。 英国托管甚至法国托管已经存在了几十年。 以色列仍然存在。

    到 1938 年,沙特阿拉伯首次发现石油,引发了对中东石油财富控制权的疯狂争夺。 这反过来又迫使英国人通过与犹太复国主义者保持距离来吸引阿拉伯人。

    这太蠢了,我哭了。 西方世界从未与犹太复国主义保持距离,他们不能像犹太人一样控制他们的国家。 不是白人,也不是阿拉伯人,而是犹太人。

    • 回复: @Patrick McNally
    , @antibeast
  272. @Malla

    美国于1917年2月加入第一次世界大战。贝尔福宣言于1917年XNUMX月XNUMX日发布,与美国参战无关。 英国外交部认为犹太复国主义者在俄罗斯临时政府中具有某种影响力,可以让他们在战争中保持俄罗斯的地位,因此《贝尔福宣言》是由一种荒谬的信念促成的。 贝尔福宣言发表一周后,临时政府被扫地出门,整个事情变得毫无意义。

    • 谢谢: showmethereal
    • 回复: @Emerging Majority
    , @Malla
  273. @Patrick McNally

    Hardly, har, har, har. Timelines tell us nothing. It was all set up long in advance, going back to Benjamin Disraeli and Baron Edmond de Rothschild, utilizing the control of the Bank of England by that selfsame Rottenchild Crime Clan. The Zioni\$t project was their baby and remains so to this date. Both the Knesset parliament building and the Isareli Supreme Court one were gifts from that infamous crime clan.

    There is plenty of disinformation and misinformation out there which these schemers use to keep the peasantry in line. Looks like you are, probably forwarding the agenda, whether or not deliberately. The Balfour Doctrine was the sine qua non for The United \$tates of America Corporation to enter the war on behalf of the agenda as handed down through the likes of Bernard Baruch, Jacob Schiff, Paul Warburg along with chief Shabas Goy Minion, J.P. Morgan.

    The notorious Act of 1871 created (unlawfully) the United \$tates of America Corporation which eventually but effectually replaced constitutional governance in this ruptured republic.

    • 回复: @Patrick McNally
  274. @Emerging Majority

    雅各布·希夫一直反对美国加入第一次世界大战,直到沙皇政府于 1917 年 XNUMX 月被推翻,取而代之的是希夫支持的临时政府。 当时希夫放弃了对美国参战的反对意见。 但美国入境的宣传已经进行了一段时间。 没有证据表明希夫在其中发挥了任何作用。 XNUMX 月发表的《贝尔福宣言》的决定与涉及美国的问题完全不同。

  275. sarz 说:
    @Jihadijew

    You can download for free several different editions of Arthur Butz’s Hoax of the Century from Z-Library at

    https://b-ok.cc/

  276. antibeast 说:
    @Malla

    But the Sykes Picot Agreement did not lead to any long term British or French colonization.

    Depends on what you mean by ‘long-term’ as both the British and French had every intention of staying as proven by the Treaty of Sevres which had planned to partition the remnants of the Ottoman Empire including Anatolia which led to the Turkish War of Independence. The Arabs also rebelled against the British and French who brutally quelled the rebellions.

    完全不是,所谓的中东殖民化是犹太复国主义的副业。 英国托管甚至法国托管已经存在了几十年。 以色列仍然存在。

    Nobody cared about the Zionists in Palestine as it was Hitler’s rise to power which led to the mass influx of Ashkenazi Jews from Europe, as promoted by the Haavara Agreement. That’s why the British left Palestine after their Mandate ended in 1948. Most of the Jewish refugees from Europe, North Africa and the Middle East arrived thereafter with another spike in Jewish arrivals occurring after the Fall of the Soviet Union.

    这太蠢了,我哭了。 西方世界从未与犹太复国主义保持距离,他们不能像犹太人一样控制他们的国家。 不是白人,也不是阿拉伯人,而是犹太人。

    The geopolitics of the Middle East is quite complex. Not everything the West does has to do with the Zionists. The case of Turkey is a good example as nobody had predicted the outcome of the Treaty of Sevres when the Allied Powers decided to partition Anatolia. That has more to do with the long-cherished dream of Western Christiandom to expel the Ottoman Turks from Europe and reclaim Constantinople from the Muslim Asiatics.

    Other examples include the Suez Canal Crisis, Malayan Emergency and the French Indochina War which have nothing to do with the Zionists but everything to do with British/French Colonialism and Imperialism.

    • 回复: @Malla
    , @Malla
  277. @Malla

    I notice as per usual you refuse to respond to someone like “Patrick McNally”…. Scared of those with names from the British Isles? In actuality I left that comment knowing you would reply to me – but not answer his question directly… Except with some sort of appeasement. You only get brave with those you don’t believe are Anglos.

    • 回复: @Malla
  278. Malla 说:
    @antibeast

    Treaty of Sevres

    What rubbish!!!
    The three principles of the British Balfour Declaration of 1917 regarding Palestine were adopted in the Treaty of Sèvres:
    Article 95: The High Contracting Parties agree to entrust, by application of the provisions of Article 22, the administration of Palestine, within such boundaries as may be determined by the Principal Allied Powers, to a Mandatory to be selected by the said Powers. The Mandatory will be responsible for putting into effect the declaration originally made on 2 November 1917 by the British Government, and adopted by the other Allied Powers, in favour of the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.

    Nobody cared about the Zionists in Palestine
    Not everything the West does has to do with the Zionists. The case of Turkey is a good example

    What rubbish!!
    In 1903 the British Government had offered Uganda to Zionism and Max Nordau had publicly foretold “the future world war”, in the sequence to which England would procure Palestine for Zionism. In 1905 the Protocols prophetically revealed the destructive orgy of Communism. Dr. Herzl, despairing of the Czar, the Kaiser and the Sultan (the three potentates had been amiable but prudent and non-committal; they knew, what Mr. Balfour never learned, that Zionism was dynamite) had declared: “England, great England, free England, England commanding the seas will understand our aims”. Then in 1906 one Mr. Arthur James Balfour, Prime Minister of England, met Dr. Weizmann, the global leader of Zionism in a hotel room and was captivated by the notion of presenting Palestine, which was not his to give, to the Jews. Zionist Dr. Weizmann chose Manchester for his residence as Manchester held Mr. Balfour’s constituency, Winston Churchill also sought election in Manchester and commended himself to the Zionist headquarters there,; Manchester was the Zionist headquarters in England. Thereon “the Manchester Jews promptly fell into line behind him as though he were a kind of latterday Moses; one of their leaders got up at an all-jewish-meeting and announced that ‘any Jew who votes against Churchill is a traitor to the common cause’ ” (Mr. R.C. Taylor). The next meeting between Dr. Weizmann and Mr. Balfour was on December 14, 1914 after 1906. Llyod George would himself have many meetings with Balfour and Weizmann. He was PM of Britain during WW1. PM Lloyd George’s Government was full of Zionsits and Jews. He was dying to take British troops out of the European theatre and send them to Palestine.

  279. Malla 说:
    @showmethereal

    What kind of dumb response is this. Go read my question again. I will respond to him, I have responded to him many times, go check my history. Hiding behind the coattails of a lowly “Anglo white devil barbarian” McNally?? My my how much has the superior Chinese, showmethereal fallen?

    I left that comment knowing you would reply to me

    That is what you do on this site, silly games and nonsense to waste our time. Keep it up.

    • 回复: @showmethereal
  280. Malla 说:
    @Patrick McNally

    美国于1917年2月加入第一次世界大战。贝尔福宣言于1917年XNUMX月XNUMX日发布,与美国参战无关。

    愚蠢的推理。 贝尔福宣言不是一日之功。
    https://www.wrmea.org/005-november/special-report-the-hidden-history-of-the-balfour-declaration.html
    贝尔福宣言的隐藏历史

    • 回复: @Patrick McNally
  281. Malla 说:
    @antibeast

    Can you explain why Zionist PM Llyod George was desperate to send troops to Palestine even if Mr. earlier Prime Minister Herbert Asquith, Secretary for War Lord
    Kitchener, Commander-in-Chief in France Sir Douglas Haig and Chief of the Imperial General Staff Sir William Robertson were opposed to it because the Middle East/Ottoman Empire and especially Palestine was of no use to the British war effort but sending troops wouldweaken the British position in France?

    • 回复: @antibeast
  282. antibeast 说:
    @Malla

    The three principles of the British Balfour Declaration of 1917 regarding Palestine were adopted in the Treaty of Sèvres.

    True. But that proves that the Balfour Declaration was just a sideshow to the Treaty of Sèvres which was never ratified as war broke out between the Turks led by Atatürk and the Allied Powers over the partitioning of what became Turkey after its War of Independence.

    Can you explain why Zionist PM Llyod George was desperate to send troops to Palestine even if Mr. earlier Prime Minister Herbert Asquith, Secretary for War Lord Kitchener, Commander-in-Chief in France Sir Douglas Haig and Chief of the Imperial General Staff Sir William Robertson were opposed to it because the Middle East/Ottoman Empire and especially Palestine was of no use to the British war effort but sending troops would weaken the British position in France?

    Because Lloyd George wanted to appease the Zionists despite the fact that the British wanted to conquer the Ottoman Empire badly which explains why they struck a deal with the Arabs who agreed to fight the Turks in exchange for their promised independence. But the British betrayed the Arabs when they signed the Treaty of Sèvres which ended up carving up Palestine, Lebanon, Syria and Anatolia between the Allied Powers.

    My point still stands: the British intended to dismember the Ottoman Empire and ‘liberate’ the ancient Byzantine Christian Land of Anatolia (with its Capital in Constantinople) which later became Turkey after Atatürk defeated the Allied Powers. That ‘Turkish War of Independence’ was the main show in the aftermath of WWI, not the Zionist colonial project in the sparsely-populated, barren land called Palestine.

    You’re giving too much credit to the Zionists who could barely attract a few thousand Jewish settlers annually to Palestine after the establishment of the British Mandate. Only after Hitler’s rise to power in 1933 did mass emigration of tens of thousands of Stateless Jews annually from Europe to Palestine began, spurred by the Haavara Agreement. After WWII, that number exploded to hundreds of thousands of Jewish refugees from Europe, North Africa and the Middle East after the establishment of the State of Israel.

    This is why I believe the Zionists made a big mistake relying on the British who had their own colonial/imperial interests in the Middle East which conflicted with their stated aim of providing a national homeland for the Jewish Diaspora in Palestine. The Zionists who settled in Palestine ended up behaving like Western Colonialists who were openly racist towards the native Palestinian Arabs which led to their mass expulsion, now known as the Palestinian 那霸.

    • 回复: @Malla
    , @Malla
    , @Malla
    , @Malla
    , @simple mind
  283. @Malla

    Nah – I only play silly games with you because you are silly… But I obviously don’t have as much time to spend on this site as you do… I actually sometimes find your comedy entertaining.

    • 回复: @Malla
  284. @Malla

    说这不是一天的事情是无关紧要的。 1917 年 11 月,美国与德国处于战争状态。伍德罗·威尔逊在 XNUMX 月 XNUMX 日向豪斯上校表达了这样一种观点:“现在不适合发表任何明确的声明,也许只是表示同情,只要它可以在没有传达任何真正承诺的情况下发表。” 因此,Chaim Weizmann 联系了 Louis Brandeis,试图影响 Wilson。 但就英国官员的动机而言,希望将美国带入战争,这已经实现了。

    WRMEA 有一个有趣的推测性论点,声称 Zimmerman 电报不知何故是由犹太复国主义特工设计的,目的是为了挑起美国参战。 它至少比声称雅各布希夫将美国带入第一次世界大战的通常谎言要好。 但是 WRMEA 的文章过于随意地重述了 1916 年 XNUMX 月德国提出和平提议的故事。只不过这根本不是真正的和平提议。

    “Bethmann-Hollweg 自己的最低条件包括德国控制下的波兰、德国控制下的比利时(在安特卫普设有德国驻军)以及法国割让富裕的 Longwy-Briey 工业区。”
    — Correlli Barnett,伟大的战争,p。 96.

    盟军永远不会接受这样的条款,这意味着考虑到潜艇战和将美国卷入战争的风险,战争将继续与德国进行。 相比之下,关于一些犹太复国主义者是否试图引诱齐默尔曼发送电报的猜测很有趣,但对于了解美国如何卷入战争并不是那么重要。

    • 不同意: Malla
  285. Malla 说:
    @showmethereal

    I am “silly” because I destroy you pet prejudices and bullshit. Quite easy to do.

    • 哈哈: showmethereal
  286. Malla 说:
    @antibeast

    This is why I believe the Zionists made a big mistake relying on the British

    You make this idiotic argument because China wants to somehow work with both Israel and the Arabs
    (good luck) and thus try to palm the entire blame on the British. It is the British who made a mistake by not opposing the Zionists enough.

    You’re giving too much credit to the Zionists who could barely attract a few thousand Jewish settlers annually to Palestine

    I am giving credit where the credit is due. The Ottoman Empire was always a side show and most people in the British establishment had very little interest in the Ottoman empire during the War., the interest was driven primarily by Zionist influence. British policy was always pro-Ottoman to keep Russia at bay. but during WW1, Russia came on the British side and the Ottoman chose Germany, primarily because many in the Young Turk movement officers were pro-German (Attaturk was pro-French)
    OK here we go.
    Mr. Lloyd George, whose entourage at this moment was largely composed of leading Jews and Zionists. But in the highest places still stood men who thought only of national duty and winning the war. They would not condone “hatred” of a military ally or espouse a wasteful “sideshow” in Palestine. These men were Mr. Herbert Asquith (Prime Minister), Lord
    Kitchener (Secretary for War), Sir Douglas Haig (who became Commander-in-Chief in France), and Sir William Robertson (Chief-of-Staff in France, later Chief of the Imperial General Staff).

    • 回复: @showmethereal
  287. Malla 说:
    @antibeast

    PM Asquith first learned of the intrigue that was brewing when he received a proposal for a Jewish state in Palestine from a Jewish minister, Mr. Herbert Samuel, who had been present at the Weizmann-Lloyd George breakfast in December 1914; these two were informed of it beforehand. Mr. Asquith wrote, “, . . Samuel’s proposal in favour of the British annexation of Palestine, a country of the size of Wales, much of it barren mountain and part of it waterless. He thinks we might plant in this not very promising territory about three or four million Jews. . . I am not attracted to this proposed addition to our responsibilities. . .” Mr. Asquith remained of the same opinion to the end.

    Lord Kitchener (Secretary for War), who held this view, was of immense authority and public popularity. The paramount military objective at that stage, he held, was to keep Russia in the war (the Zionists wanted Russia’s destruction). Lord Kitchener was sent to Russia by Mr. Asquith in June 1916. The cruiser Hampshire, and Lord Kitchener in it, vanished. Good authorities concur that he was the one man who might have sustained Russia. A formidable obstacle, both to the Communist world-revolution there and to the Zionist enterprise, disappeared. Soldiers on the Western Front, when they heard the news of Lord Kitchener’s death, felt that they had lost a major battle.

    After that only Asquith, Robertson and Haig stood between Zionism and its goal. The circle of intrigue widened. The Times and Sunday Times joined the Manchester Guardian in its
    enthusiasm for Zionism
    , and in or around the Cabinet new men added themselves to Balfour and Lloyd George. Lord Milner announced that “if the Arabs think that Palestine will become an Arab country they are much mistaken”.Mr. Philip Kerr (Later Lord Lothian, at that time Mr. Lloyd George’s amanuensis) decided that “a Jewish Palestine” must come out of the chastisement of “the mad dog in Berlin” (as the Kaiser was depicted to “the mob”)”.

    Another recruit. Lord Robert Cecil, also used this deceptive formula, “Arabia for the Arabs, Judea for the Jews, Armenia for the Armenians” and his case also is curious, for statesmanship is inborn in the Cecils. Zionist leader Dr. Weizmann says specifically of Lord Robert, “To him the re-establishment of a Jewish Homeland in Palestine and the organisation of the world in a great federation were complementary features of the next step in the management of human affairs. . . One of the founders of the League of Nations, he considered the Jewish Homeland to be of equal importance with the League itself. ”
    So, one of the founders of the League of Nations was a hardcore Zionists and wanted Israel at any cost.

    Zionism had its foot in every department of the British government save the War Office. Whatever the original nature of their enthusiasm for Zionism, material rewards at this stage undeniably beckoned; the intrigue was aimed at dislodging men from office and taking their places. The obstructive prime minister, Mr. Asquith, was removed at the end of 1916. The first act of his successors was to divert forces to Palestine. Zionist Prime Minister Lloyd George appointed the incompetent Mr. Balfour Foreign Secretary.
    Thus the two men privily committed to support Zionism moved into the highest political offices and from that moment the energies of the British Government were directed to the procurement of Palestine for the Zionists above all other purposes. A letter in the Jewish journal Commentary, of New York, intimated that the Jews of North Wales had by their votes played the decisive part in effecting Mr. Lloyd George’s election.

  288. Malla 说:
    @antibeast

    As to the diversion of British military strength to an alien purpose, one stout resistant alone remained after the death of Lord Kitchener and removal of Mr. Asquith. The sturdy figure of Sir William Robertson faced the Zionist group around Mr. Lloyd George. Had he joined it, he could have had titles, receptions, freedoms, orders, gilt boxes, and ribbons down to his waistbelt; but because of his opposition to Zionism, he did not even receive a peerage, and is rare among British field marshals in this. Sir William Robertson had risen to that highest rank of Field Marshal from mere private, all the way to the top. He was simple, honest, heavy, rugged in feature; he was of the people and his only support, in his struggle, lay in the commander in France, Sir Douglas Haig, who was of the cavalry officer caste. He felt the task of thwarting the diversion of British armies to Palestine, if he could. He decided that the Zionist proposal was for a dangerous “sideshow” which could only delay and imperil victory. He never discussed and may not even have suspected any political implications; these were irrelevant to him. He had told Mr. Asquith in 1915, “Obviously the most effective method” (of defeating the Central Powers) “is to defeat decisively the main German armies, which are still on the Western Front”. Therefore he counselled urgently against, auxiliary campaigns in minor theatres and the depletion of the forces in France”.

    However When Mr. Lloyd George became prime minister he at once bent all his efforts on diverting strength to a major campaign in Palestine: “When I formed my government I at once raised with the War Office the question of a further campaign into Palestine. Sir William Robertson, who was most anxious to avert the danger of any troops being sent from France to Palestine. . . strongly opposed this and for the time being won his point” .

    Sir William Robertson corroborates: “Up to December 1916” (when Mr. Lloyd George became prime minister) “operations beyond the Suez Canal had been essentially defensive in principle, the government and General Staff alike. . . recognising the paramount importance of the struggle in Europe and the need to give the armies there the utmost support. This unanimity between ministers and soldiers did not obtain after the premiership changed hands. . . The fundamental difference of opinion was particularly obtrusive in the case of Palestine. . . The new War Cabinet had been in existence only a few days when it directed the General Staff to examine the possibility of extending the operations in Palestine. . . The General Staff put the requirements at three additional divisions and these could only be obtained from the armies on the Western Front. . . The General Staff said the project would prove a great source of embarrassment and injure our prospects of success in France. . . These conclusions were disappointing to Ministers, . . . who wished to see Palestine occupied at once, but they could not be refuted … In February the War Cabinet again approached the Chief of the General Staff, asking what progress was being made with the preparation of an autumn campaign in Palestine”. These passages show how the course of State policy and of military operations in war were “deflected” by Zionist political pressure behind the scenes.
    Mr. Lloyd George then proposed that the War Cabinet “take the Dominions into counsel in a much larger measure than hitherto in the prosecution of the war”. Put in that way, the idea appealed greatly to the public masses in England. Fighting-men from Canada, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa were campaigning shoulder to shoulder with their own sons. The immediate response of the overseas countries to the “old country’s” danger had touched the native Briton’s heart. However, Mr. Lloyd George’s proposal was merely a “cover” for bringing to London General Smuts from South Africa, who was regarded by the Zionists as their most valuable “friend” outside Europe and America, and General Smuts was brought across to propose the conquest of Palestine! On March 17, 1917 General Smuts reached London, amid unprecedented ovations, and the overthrow of Sir William Robertson at last loomed near. Sir William Robertson then had a talk with General Smuts. General Smuts was made aware for the risk of a fiasco in the field might destroy his political future in South Africa. Therefore, after his talk with Sir William Robertson, he declined Mr. Lloyd George’s offer. At the time he told Mr. Lloyd George, “My strong conviction is that our present military situation does not really justify an offensive campaign for the capture of Jerusalem and the occupation of Palestine” .

  289. Malla 说:
    @antibeast

    Zionist PM Mr. Lloyd George was not to be deterred even by this volte-face of General Smuts, or by the collapse of Russia. In September 1917 he decided that “the requisite troops for a big campaign in
    Palestine could be spared from the Western Front during the winter of 1917-191 8 and could complete the task in Palestine in time to be back in France for the opening of active work in the spring”.
    Enter Sir Henry Wilson who had earlier had agreed with all other military leaders about the paramountcy of the main front and the madness of wasteful “sideshows”: “The way to end this war is to kill Germans, not Turks. . . The place where we can kill most Germans is here” (France ) “and therefore every pound of ammunition we have in the world ought to come here. All history shows that operations in a secondary and ineffectual theatre have no bearing on major operations except to weaken the forces there engaged” (1915). However Sir Henry later did a volt-face when he observed powerful influence of Zionism on the British Government and the nature of Mr. Lloyd George’s dispute with his own chief, Sir William Robertson. Hence Zionist leader Dr. Weizmann’s account of his “discoveries of friends” at that period include an allusion to the “sympathy” of General Wilson, “a great friend of Lloyd George”. On August 23, 1917 Sir Henry reported to the Zionist PM Mr. Lloyd George “the strong belief that if a really good scheme was thoroughly well worked out, we could clear the Turks out of Palestine and very likely knock them completely out during the mud-months without in any way interfering with Haig’s operations next spring and winter” (in France). In this report Zionist PM Mr. Lloyd George at long last found the support he needed for his order of September 1917. On this counsel PM Lloyd George founded his decision to take from France “the requisite troops for a big campaign in Palestine” and to have them back in France in time for any emergency there. Sir William Robertson vainly pointed out that the time-table was illusory; the movement of armies entailed major problems of transport and shipping, and by the time the last divisions landed in Palestine the first ones would be re-embarking! In October he again warned that troops taken from France could not be back there in time for summer fighting: “the right military course to pursue is to act on the defensive in Palestine. . . and continue to seek a decision in the West … all reserves should be sent to the Western Front”.

    At that fateful instant chance, ever the arch-conspirator in this story, struck in favour of the Zionists. Cabinet Ministers in London (who apparently had almost forgotten the Western Front) were badgering Sir William Robertson to “give us Jerusalem as a Christmas box” (the phrase appears to reveal again the “extraordinary flippancy” about the war which Zionist leader Dr. Weizmann earlier attributed to Mr. Lloyd George). In Palestine General Allenby, under similar pressure, made a probing advance, the Turks easily collapsed infront of the British attack, and without much difficulty marched into Jerusalem. The prize was of no military value, in the total sum of the war, but Mr. Lloyd George thenceforward was not to be restrained. Troops were diverted from France without regard to what impended there. 在1月6,1918上 Sir Douglas Haig complained of the weakening of his armies in France on the eve of the greatest battle; he was “114,000 infantry down”. On January 10,1918 the War Office was forced to issue orders to reduce all divisions from 12 to 9 battalions of infantry.

  290. @Mulga Mumblebrain

    None of that is real outside your mind. “Assets” are fiction, somewhere on planet earth 8 billion human monkeys scratch fur and climb trees, get over it. Walk onto the property and find out if “assets” and “crapitalism” was real, or if possession of the land.

    Nobody calls “911 I have a deed!” but they do say “trespassers”. All of those fake werkers at morican jerbs INC should just go right to the place they were “hard werkin” and keep at it… what stops them? Their own sheriff dept? Their own jury?

    Welcome to your Mind on Fables

    • 巨魔: Mulga Mumblebrain
    • 回复: @Mulga Mumblebrain
  291. @antibeast

    The Zionists who settled in Palestine ended up behaving like Western Colonialists who were openly racist towards the native Palestinian Arabs which led to their mass expulsion

    What “lead” to their flight and expulsion was the stress and provocation it placed on the Jewish Community (“Yishuv”) during the invasion by 5 Arab armies threatening to destroy half million people and everything they had worked for in the last 50 years.

    在这之后:

    https://www.camera.org/article/anti-jewish-violence-in-pre-state-palestine-1929-massacres/

    Nobody had any doubts left. The Palestinian Arabs reaped their own whirlwind and got far less than what they really deserved. The Israelis fought each other at the same time, going so far as to blow up their own supply ships if it went to the wrong “side”:

    https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/the-altalena-affair

  292. @Malla

    “You make this idiotic argument because China wants to somehow work with both Israel and the Arabs
    (good luck) and thus try to palm the entire blame on the British”

    Aside from incessantly wanting to defend anything British… Explain that statement….
    China already does have good relations with Israel and the Arab states and Iran… That’s what you can do when you don’t seek to control others… They are willing to work with you… In fact – if not for the US constantly griping – Israel admits it would be even closer with China… Meanwhile from Egypt straight to Iran the relationships flourish… The UAE plays a dividing line. It agreed to stop a Chinese port – but refuses to stop dealing with Huawei…. Israel did the exact opposite – by refusing US requests to stop a Chinese port – while agreeing to pull back from Huawei.
    The UAE has good relations with the US… And Israel… And China… And is rebuilding relations with Iran… Trade now goes direct from UAE to Iranian ports. They are basically doing what Qatar was doing (though Qatar doesn’t have relations with Israel)… Qatar was building relations with Iran and Turkey – while having good relations with both the US and China. So much so that the other Arab states (including UAE at the time) tried to blockade it. They didn’t flinch. Now UAE is following the same path. That’s what happens when people are truly neutral and don’t try to play divide and rule. Not sure why your sources never explained those to you.

    • 回复: @Malla
  293. Malla 说:

    I defend those who are wrongly accused. I have defended China from Indian nationalists uncountable times. You have no idea how Indian patriots think about China, whenever they made stupid false allegations, I have been in the forefront to destroy their bullshit. Same with the British Empire or any other parties falsely accused.
    Listen, you did not understand my take. The Chinese are pragmatic and want to do business and increase their influence. They do not want all these conflicts which may impede this. So I postulated since the Chinese seem to have a visceral hatred for Anglos, they are using the technique of blaming everything on the Anglos and then trying uniting Israelis and Arabs and Chinese in one big happy family eating dimsum with hummus and making the money by hating the Anglo together. But these accusations are simply false.
    I say this because I cam across many wumaos trying the same trick in the India-pak conflict on youtube or reddit, I do not remember where. And they scored a self goal, I was like “do not go down that path idiot Wumaos”. So the Chinese Wumaos were like India Pak division crated by evil British. What they Chinese did not see coming was the Indian nationalist gang (Indian Wumaos) agreed with Chinese Wumaos that Pakistan is a British colonial creation and that Pakistan should become part of the motherland (Chinese wumaos stunend about where this went) and then accused the Chinese for supporting a colonial creation. The Chinese Wumao’s were stunned.
    I have seen this trick been played before.

  294. Malla 说:
    @simple mind

    stress and provocation it placed on the Jewish Community (“Yishuv”)

    So a people come and steal their land and the Arabs are supposed to welcome them invasive Jew species with rose garlands??? What were they supposed to do?

    • 回复: @simple mind
  295. antibeast 说:
    @simple mind

    What “lead” to their flight and expulsion was the stress and provocation it placed on the Jewish Community (“Yishuv”) during the invasion by 5 Arab armies threatening to destroy half million people and everything they had worked for in the last 50 years.

    No, what led to their mass exodus is the forced expulsions from their homes and villages at gunpoint by Israeli soldiers during the Arab invasion. One could argue that a ‘State of War’ already exists between the Arabs and Israelis after the Arab invasion began which would have justified the Israeli Army taking precautionary measures. But all they needed to do was to relocate those Palestinian Arabs to concentration camps within Palestine but outside the newly-established State of Israel, in accordance with the UN Mandate. That would have been enough to secure the safety of Israeli Jews from Palestinian Arab reprisals.

    Once the war ended, those Palestine Arabs would be released to the Arab partition of Palestine where they would be free to establish their own State with compensation paid to them for their lost homes, lands and properties. THAT would have been the right thing to do.

  296. @antibeast

    “All they needed to do”

    relocate those Palestinian Arabs to concentration camps within Palestine but outside the newly-established State of Israel

    You mean exactly what happened? Because that’s pretty much what happened.

    • 回复: @antibeast
  297. @Malla

    Jews and Arabs are the same species, and yes they had better be “welcomed”. The whole world does not revolve around your mind and weird urges. Meanwhile

    Arabs have no land, they are nomads and shytehole 3rd world villagers

    https://israelipalestinian.procon.org/population-statistics/

    Palestine, c. 1900 CE: half a million people

    No Arab has anything a Jew could possibly want, it’s like calling gentrification “stealing”

    less dindoos is a feature not a bug

    • 回复: @Malla
  298. Malla 说:
    @showmethereal

    The UAE has good relations with the US… And 以色列… And China

    LOL UAE trading with Israel is not a good thing, it means the greedy Emiratis have thrown their Palestinian brothers under the bus, for money.
    Increased trade in between Iran, Turkey and Arabs as well as outsiders like USA, EU, China etc… is a good thing alrite.

    • 回复: @showmethereal
  299. @antibeast

    There was NO ‘Arab invasion’. The Zionazis commenced Plan Dalet in late 47, with the aim of expelling ALL non-Jews, by terror and murder. The Arab armies’ later intervention only thwarted the full pursuit of the Plan, leaving some non-Jews in the Galilee, today’s second-class Israeli Arabs. That failure OUTRAGED Ben-Gurion. Why do you Zionazis STILL lie about the Nakbah, decades after Israeli ‘New Historians’, studying Zinazi documents, established the facts? Is it some sort of religious observance?

    • 回复: @antibeast
  300. @simple mind

    Why do you Zionazi thugs STILL lie about the Nakbah, decades after the Israeli ‘New Historians’ showed that the Palestinian accounts were true, by studying Israeli records? Is it some sort of religious act, like swinging chickens?

  301. @simple mind

    Everything on Earth belongs to the Jews, by Divine Right. Is that not so, you venomous, xenophobic, racist hate pustule?

  302. @simple mind

    “ The realm of law is what governs finance and economy, ”

    There is no denying a dynamic relation exists between promulgated laws and the world of finance. But reality tells us that laws are by and large designed to protect the interests of financiers and the moneyed class in general. While the realm of law can be totally subjective, even though it is supposed to be objective and in the interest of the common good, economics and finance which are hardly a science, are still subject to empirical rules that could restrain unsound practices of subsidies and the like, such as the law of supply and demand which negates price fixing, or the law of balanced budgets that checks the practice of runaway debt. The realm of the law is by and large determined by a balance of power between the ruled and the ruler. In the Western society of today where the old balance of countervailing societal forces managed to address the injustice of the laws, the unchecked rise of oligarchic power has destroyed the credibility of the law as an instrument at the service of the people and entrenched the rent power of the excessively rich.

    “ Usury has little to do with mathematic calculations or “profit shares”, it is the suspension of ordinary time limits in property right.”

    Property rights are essential to the productivity of any functioning society as the failed communist experiment proves. Yet property right should be tempered by meritocracy which in this case means productivity in the interest of the common good; thus landed gentry who simply claim title to land that their ancestors acquired by force of arms or by sheer usurpation, as the British aristocracy did to the properties of the Catholic Church which hitherto were lands used for the benefit of the clergy and the masses, should be heavily taxed as long as those lands are in a non productive state and the rent collected on productive use should also be adequately taxed.

    “ There is no usury in the accounting system or by calculating “interest”, usury just means “rent”

    Renting any tangible asset that had been acquired by force or other crooked means is bad enough. Renting money printed out of thin air by central bankers and their commercial banking acolytes under the principle of charging interest is the worst policy which feeds the parasitical class. History has proven in England that banning usury as it happened between the end of the thirteen century till the Oliver Cromwell revolution which restored the role of the parasitical bankers, proved that people and economies can flourish and prosper without the interest charging parasites.

  303. @simple mind

    No wonder you people are the natural allies of the Anglo-Saxons.

    • 回复: @Malla
  304. Malla 说:
    @simple mind

    Jews and Arabs are the same species, and yes they had better be “welcomed”.

    I am sure if 5 million Yemeni Muslim Arab tribesmen suddenly decide to go and take land in Israel, they will be “welcomed”.

    Arabs have no land, they are nomads and shytehole 3rd world villagers

    Wow, what arrogance!! Damascus and Bagdad of the Golden age was no shytehole 3rd world villages. Arabs had created a magnificent civilization. There is nothing called Jewish civilization as such. Even the food eaten by Israelis may be stolen from Arabs.

    No Arab has anything a Jew could possibly want, it’s like calling gentrification “stealing”

    By that logic any First World population can go claim some Third world shithole???

    • 回复: @simple mind
  305. Malla 说:
    @The_MasterWang

    natural allies of the Anglo-Saxons.

    natural allies or masters? Check out post 296 on this page Sir William Robertson, a daring soldier who rose all the way to the top from simple private to Field Marshall in the British Army was denied a peerage for being an enemy of Zionism.

  306. antibeast 说:
    @simple mind

    No, the Arabs were loaded onto boats and thrown into the sea while the rest were driven out of Palestine at gunpoint.

    What should have happened was for Israel to setup ‘concentration camps’ inside Palestine but outside the State of Israel during the First Arab-Israeli War. After the war ended, Israel should then help resettle those Arabs in a future Palestinian State to be established for them, with Israeli funding and support for building their infrastructure and providing for their welfare for a minimum period of 50 years, as compensation for their lost homes, lands and properties, in accordance with the 1947 UN Mandate.

    To prevent future attacks from hostile Arab nations, Israel should have invited the UN to send an international peacekeeping force to enforce the 1947 UN Mandate, for a minimum period of 50 years, with the strategic goal of maintaining peace and order between the State of Israel, the State of Palestine and the surrounding Arab nations.

    THAT is how the Israelis should have implemented the 1947 UN Mandate, not by seizing Palestinian land or expelling the Arabs from Palestine which violated international law, but by relinquishing every inch of Palestinian territory acquired during the war and helping the Palestinian Arabs resettle in their own Palestinian State. The fact that Arab nations rejected the UN Mandate means THEY violated international law by invading the newly-established State of Israel NOT the Israelis who acted to protect their own national security in response to the Arab invasion.

    • 回复: @simple mind
  307. @Malla

    I’m not arguing about what is good or bad… My point is your claim was that China can’t deal with Israel and Arabs at the same time… But it has been working for 20 years… Other countries do it as well. As long as you aren’t trying to dominate others it is very easy to have even diplomacy. As far as Emirates and Palestinians – I can’t speak on it. I know they and Qataris were still giving them support… I don’t know what the status is with the UAE now and won’t pretend to know what goes on in the back channels that we don’t know about. But the provocative moves Israel is making now such as in the Golan Heights is because of US backing – no other reason…

    • 回复: @Malla
  308. @antibeast

    None of that is real outside your own mind, and the concentration camps WERE set up both “outside” Israeli lines, and “within” Mandatory Palestine… every hear of the “West Bank” and the “Gaza Strip”?? The “camps” are called UNRWA, aka “refugee camps” i.e. more 3rd world shytehole slums.

    Both areas are within the former “Palestine”, while Lebanon is simply much closer to certain areas and therefore it was also the destination. None of these countries and borders are real, and Israelis were under no obligation to “fund” anyone, eventually absorbing one million Jewish refugees from the Arab World, who were supposed to take their own people in exchange.

    中东犹太人留下的财产数量使当地阿拉伯人在 1948 年腾出的“巴勒斯坦”村庄的废墟相形见绌。 1947 年的以色列人是一个几乎无法自卫的小殖民地人口,没有所需的资源或人数完成你奇怪的妄想幻想。

    联合国“1947”分区毫无意义,它只是解决一个无论如何都只有一面的事情的提议。 没有人在枪口下“强迫”阿拉伯人上船,尽管他们确实乘船逃离了某些港口城镇,因为那里有船,而且没有“巴勒斯坦土地”这样的东西。

    在吸收了 2 万难民的同时,犹太人购买了保卫他们的人口和为一代人呼吸所需的最小空间。 国际法适用于国家而不是“人口”,前英属巴勒斯坦地区不存在“巴勒斯坦领土”。 也没有像“国际法”这样随意的东西,这不是法律的运作方式。 你不只是引用“法律”环游世界,它会神奇地发生。

    Everything you wrote is wrong, and it encapsulates the western delusional fantasy

  309. @Malla

    LOL you mean 1000 years ago?? Palestine c. 1900 was populated by a random assortment of about half a million people and it was DEFINTELY a shytehole like all Arab countries still are today.

    By that logic any First World population can go claim some Third world shithole

    It makes at LEAST as much sense as any Third World population claiming some First World continent… I have never understood why come Muslims can live in Europe but Jews not in Palestine. More dindoos looking for welfare

    • 巨魔: Mulga Mumblebrain
    • 回复: @Mulga Mumblebrain
  310. @simple mind

    This Zionazi is so demented with Talmudic xenophobia and hatred, that I think he rather overdoes it. Could it be some Judeophobe trying to portray Jews as deranged, genocidal, racists?

  311. @simple mind

    Every word, every punctuation mark, a vicious lie, and this after decades of global historical consensus on Zionazi aggression in 1947, Zionazi butchery and ethnic cleansing, and ceaseless Zionazi barbarity EVER since. THIS is why the real ‘International Community’ loathes Israel and would not shed a tear if it disappeared. Not every Israeli is as EVIL as this demented liar, but, unfortunately, it does appear as if a majority are on the spectrum, thus guaranteeing Israel’s eventual demise. There appears to be some sort of self-loathing among the worst of the Jews, that drives them to seek their own destruction.

  312. antibeast 说:
    @simple mind

    联合国“1947”分区毫无意义,它只是解决一个无论如何都只有一面的事情的提议。 没有人在枪口下“强迫”阿拉伯人上船,尽管他们确实乘船逃离了某些港口城镇,因为那里有船,而且没有“巴勒斯坦土地”这样的东西。

    1947 年的联合国授权是“国际法”的一部分,将巴勒斯坦分为两部分:一部分用于新成立的以色列国,另一部分用于未来的巴勒斯坦国。 现在,授权没有规定任何人口转移来实现分治,因此如果阿拉伯国家没有进行军事干预以摧毁新建立的以色列国,那么本应通过将阿拉伯人重新安置到分治的巴勒斯坦一侧的自愿程序来实施。 . 但阿拉伯人确实入侵以色列的事实意味着,出于国家安全的考虑,必须通过武力进行人口转移。

    中东犹太人留下的财产数量使当地阿拉伯人在 1948 年腾出的“巴勒斯坦”村庄的废墟相形见绌。 1947 年的以色列人是一个几乎无法自卫的小殖民地人口,没有所需的资源或人数完成你奇怪的妄想幻想。

    是的,Mizrahim 犹太人不得不逃离中东和北非的穆斯林阿拉伯人,留下了许多宝贵的财产。 那是被亲阿拉伯宣传所忽视的犹太灾难。 那些 Mizrahim 犹太人应该起诉穆斯林阿拉伯人,要求他们赔偿他们失去的家园、土地和财产。

    以色列人口少,但它确实有资源建立自己的现代国家。 它至少可以做的是通过拉拢巴勒斯坦阿拉伯人并将他们变成以色列的客户来帮助建立一个巴勒斯坦国。

    在吸收了 2 万难民的同时,犹太人购买了保卫他们的人口和为一代人呼吸所需的最小空间。 国际法适用于国家而不是“人口”,前英属巴勒斯坦地区不存在“巴勒斯坦领土”。 也没有像“国际法”这样随意的东西,这不是法律的运作方式。 你不只是引用“法律”环游世界,它会神奇地发生。

    分治前犹太人拥有的土地很少。 这就是为什么 1947 年的联合国授权是犹太人的政治胜利,而阿拉伯人认为这对他们“不公平”。 但是当阿拉伯人决定入侵以色列时,“国际法”站在犹太人一边。 这就是为什么以色列人应该坚持 1947 年联合国授权规定的分区,而不是多一英寸或少一英寸,因为那是“国际法”。

    悲剧在于,在以色列于 1948 年建国后的四年内,更多的无国籍犹太人定居在以色列国,而不是自英国托管以来的前 1947 年中的犹太复国主义者。 但正是犹太复国主义者通过无视 1947 年联合国授权而将事情掌握在自己手中,该授权的目的恰恰是作为一个人道主义项目——而不是作为一个殖民项目——来容纳那些无国籍的犹太人。 对于自英国托管以来一直参与殖民项目的犹太复国主义者来说,这是道德上的失败。 由于英国打算离开巴勒斯坦,这意味着殖民计划在 XNUMX 年联合国授权时已经结束。

    • 回复: @Mulga Mumblebrain
  313. Malla 说:
    @showmethereal

    我的观点是你的说法是中国不能同时与以色列和阿拉伯人打交道

    我从来没有这么声称过。 事实上,中国在坚持经商、尽可能不参与政治方面做得很好。 但政治总是会引起并发症。

  314. antibeast 说:
    @Mulga Mumblebrain

    没有“阿拉伯入侵”。 犹太复国主义在 47 年末启动了达莱特计划,目的是通过恐怖和谋杀驱逐所有非犹太人。 阿拉伯军队后来的干预只是阻碍了计划的全面实施,在加利利留下了一些非犹太人,即今天的二等以色列阿拉伯人。

    阿拉伯民族主义者入侵以色列是因为他们想吞并巴勒斯坦以建立一个后来被称为“UAR”的泛阿拉伯国家,愤世嫉俗地利用巴勒斯坦阿拉伯人的困境作为 宣战 为阿拉伯入侵。 由于大规模驱逐巴勒斯坦阿拉伯人现在被称为“那霸几乎所有反对以色列的人都将其武器化:阿拉伯民族主义者、伊朗毛拉、伊斯兰国家、西方 BDS 活动家,甚至白人“另类右翼”民族主义者。 除了造成道德泥潭已经并继续被以色列国的敌人利用之外,将巴勒斯坦阿拉伯人大规模驱逐到邻国黎巴嫩导致其不稳定,随后引发了黎巴嫩内战,使黎巴嫩基督徒与穆斯林对立。现在阿拉伯人的数量超过了以前的基督教多数。

    阿以冲突从来都不是关于巴勒斯坦阿拉伯人的命运,而是关于阿拉伯民族主义与犹太复国主义的冲突。 随后的所有阿以战争都旨在摧毁以色列国,以实现埃及纳赛尔等阿拉伯民族主义者建立泛阿拉伯国家统治巴勒斯坦的梦想,而不是帮助巴勒斯坦阿拉伯人建立自己独立的巴勒斯坦国. 这就是为什么阿拉伯国家拒绝 1947 年联合国授权并在 1948 年“独立宣言”的第二天入侵以色列。

  315. 鞋匠。 犹太复国主义在 1947 年末开始了他们的恐怖活动 Plan Dalet,而阿拉伯联盟直到 1948 年 XNUMX 月才进行干预,这就是为什么一些巴勒斯坦人,主要是在加利利,没有被驱逐。 为什么在以色列“新历史学家”根据以色列记录工作、证实巴勒斯坦人对灾难的记载几十年后,你们这些生物仍然撒谎?

  316. @antibeast

    大多数前往以色列的东方犹太人都是遵照犹太复国主义的命令这样做的。 在他们被证明不情愿的地方,以色列恐怖分子在犹太教堂等处引爆炸弹,以踩踏他们。 一旦犹太复国主义者对巴勒斯坦人实施的暴行、屠杀和驱逐变得显而易见,一些当地人也开始攻击犹太人。 几十年来,东方犹太人一旦进入以色列,就被阿斯肯纳兹人视为二等人。 他们甚至以让人想起集中营中纳粹“医生”的方式对(主要是也门儿童)进行试验。
    我确实同意犹太复国主义的行为可以部分解释为对 ALL goyim 的愤怒和仇恨,灌输了 3500 多年,以及最近对纳粹​​屠杀的恐怖。 他们没有心情对他们的邪教所说的“双足动物”妥协。

    • 回复: @antibeast
  317. antibeast 说:
    @Mulga Mumblebrain

    我确实同意犹太复国主义的行为可以部分解释为对 ALL goyim 的愤怒和仇恨,灌输了 3500 多年,以及最近对纳粹​​屠杀的恐怖。 他们没有心情对他们的邪教所说的“双足动物”妥协。

    Having internalized two millennia of European antisemitism, the Zionists couldn’t help themselves but behave like Western colonial settlers who were openly racist towards the Palestinian Arabs whom they displaced and then expelled by force and violence. The Zionists also treated the Mizrahim/Sephardim Jews from the Middle East and North Africa with racist contempt by instituting a quasi-apartheid policy against those Black and Brown Jews. So it was not only Arab goyim but also Oriental Jews who suffered under Zionist Colonialism in Palestine.

当前评论者
说:

发表评论-对超过两周的文章发表评论,将在质量和语气上进行更严格的判断


 记得 我的信息为什么?
 电子邮件回复我的评论
$
提交的评论已被许可给 Unz评论 并可以由后者自行决定在其他地方重新发布
在翻译模式下禁用评论
通过RSS订阅此评论主题 通过RSS订阅所有Ilana Mercer评论