Unz评论•另类媒体选择$
美国主流媒体大都排除了有趣,重要和有争议的观点
 博客浏览以色列沙米尔档案馆
苏格拉底和祖雷卡
如果犹太人太多​​,那么犹太人就会太多…
通过电子邮件将此页面发送给其他人

 记住我的信息



=>

书签 全部切换总目录添加到图书馆从图书馆中删除 • B
显示评论下一个新评论下一个新回复了解更多
回复同意/不同意/等等 更多... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
同意不同意谢谢LOL轮唱
这些按钮可将您的公开协议,异议,感谢,LOL或巨魔与所选注释一起注册。 仅对最近使用“记住我的信息”复选框保存姓名和电子邮件的频繁评论者可用,并且在任何八个小时的时间内也只能使用三次。
忽略评论者 关注评论者
搜寻文字 区分大小写  确切的词  包括评论
列表 书签

A major share of the world media is concentrated in Jewish hands, well beyond the wild dreams of the mythic “Elders” and this share is growing daily. In Chile and Argentina, inKazakhstan and Canada, even in far-away Finland with its tiny Jewish community, the key media belongs to Jews. In Russia every outrage of independence-seeking Chechens is immediately compared by ubiquitous Judeophilic editors to ‘Palestinian atrocities’. In theUK, the media is cornered by a group of extreme Judeophiles from Conrad Black to Rupert Murdoch, and ethnic Jews from Michael Green to Richard Desmond. Just recently Haim Saban had bought another German TV network. As for the US, we have a good list of Jews in the media drawn by our friend Jeff Blankfort, available on the Web”, writes Israel Shamir in his Spider Web.

http://www.israelshamir.net/shamirImages/Shamir/SpiderWeb.htm

“Wait!” – wrote our reader Dr Zuleika Dobson from Cambridge . “Ought we to be interested in religion or ethnic origin of these men who own or edit media? Is this a legitimate question? Isn’t it, ah… racist?”

In order to answer the query of Ms Dobson, The Applied Metaphysics Institute of Inner Mongolia conjured up the spirit of Socrates, this guide to wisdom, and turned the question to him. The following is a script of Socrates’ conversation with Dr Dobson; references to Dr Dobson’s eyelashes (“too long”), waist (“too narrow”) and coffee preferences (“buy it from Nicanor next time”) were carefully expunged.

苏格拉底:

– Let us divide qualities into four categories. Some are irrelevant, and we can’t have too much or too little of these. Some are so bad that we can’t have too little of it; some are so good that we can’t ever have too much. Another category will consist of qualities we can have too much or too little thereof. To what category does ‘Jewishness’ belong?

Zuleika:

– Why, Socrates, we may safely exclude the second and the third proposition. Nobody thinks that Jews are so evil that there is no place for an Einstein. Nobody thinks that Jews are utterly beneficial that they can’t produce a Sharon or a Dershowitz. But perhaps “Jewishness’ is irrelevant?

苏格拉底:

– Your society considers group-belonging relevant. You have laws against employing too few blacks or whites, too few women or men. You call it ‘discrimination’. Ethnicity and religion are possible discrimination factors. Thus, Greg Dyke of the BBC complained that, “the BBC is hideously white”[1]. He considered his efforts to enlarge the ethnic representation of the BBC to be the “acid test” of his tenure. London newspapers write with trepidation about Arabs or the Russians buying properties in that capital city. In the British media, a journalist is asked to what community he belongs. He is offered a long list of communities from which to make his pick, ranging from Muslim Bengalis to Catholic Croats, in order “to ensure fair representation of communities in the media”. However, the category “Jews” is missing from the list.

祖莱卡

– Maybe ‘Jewishness’, like the ability to jump, is an irrelevant category for a journalist? Is there a way to find out what is relevant and what is not, oh Socrates?

苏格拉底:

立即订购

– If a person can be discriminated against on base of a quality, the quality is relevant and other way around: if there is no way to discriminate according to a particular quality, then that quality is irrelevant. In other words, if there could be too little, there could be too much and vice versa. We can’t have “too much” or “too little” of truly irrelevant qualities.

祖莱卡

– Very good, Socrates! Now we should find out whether there were complaints of having too few Jews in media, universities or administration?

苏格拉底:

– Indeed. Naomi Klein writes in her book 没有标识 that she began her political career by fighting discrimination against Jews on the boards of New York-based companies. She found out there were too few Jews, less than their share in the city population, on the boards of some companies, and fought this discrimination. There are many complaints by Jews that Princeton University does not allow its student body to consist of more than 40% Jews — they consider that “too little”. We can therefore conclude that Jewishness is a relevant quality; if there can be too few Jews, accordingly, there can be too many Jews in the media, in an administration or at a university.

(从重新发布 雅虎集团 经作者或代表的许可)
 
• 类别: 对外政策 •标签: 以色列大堂, 犹太人 
当前评论者
说:

发表评论-对超过两周的文章发表评论,将在质量和语气上进行更严格的判断


 记得 我的信息为什么?
 电子邮件回复我的评论
$
提交的评论已被许可给 Unz评论 并可以由后者自行决定在其他地方重新发布
在翻译模式下禁用评论
通过RSS订阅此评论主题 通过RSS订阅所有以色列Shamir评论