Unz评论•另类媒体选择$
美国主流媒体大都排除了有趣,重要和有争议的观点
 博客浏览约翰·德比郡档案馆
生育能力崩溃—少数民族受害最重! 选新人迟到了?
通过电子邮件将此页面发送给其他人

 记住我的信息



=>

书签 全部切换总目录添加到图书馆从图书馆中删除 • B
显示评论下一个新评论下一个新回复了解更多
回复同意/不同意/等等 更多... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
同意不同意谢谢LOL轮唱
这些按钮可将您的公开协议,异议,感谢,LOL或巨魔与所选注释一起注册。 仅对最近使用“记住我的信息”复选框保存姓名和电子邮件的频繁评论者可用,并且在任何八个小时的时间内也只能使用三次。
忽略评论者 关注评论者
搜寻文字 区分大小写  确切的词  包括评论
列表 书签

“孵化,匹配和调度”—我母亲在当地报纸上对出生,婚姻和死亡专栏的用语。

让我们参观孵化场。

孵化场主要发生的事情:业务放缓。 美国人的婴儿数量不像我们以前那样多: 美国出生率创下历史新低,MSN,17年2018月XNUMX日。该报告介绍了疾病预防控制中心(CDC)的最新生育率数据

此处的关键数字:总生育率或TFR。 以目前的速度,这就是一个女人在其生殖生活中平均拥有的孩子数量。 因此,我们假设当她XNUMX岁时,她将以今天XNUMX岁的孩子的繁殖速度繁殖。 当她三十岁的时候,她将以三十岁的孩子今天的繁殖速度繁殖; 等等。 那就是TFR。

对于一个既不增加也不减少的稳定人口,您需要每位女性的TFR略高于XNUMX,以允许不生育的人群。

去年美国的整体比率为1.76。 这比前一年的1.82下降了,短短一年就下降了XNUMX%。

我应该说这里的数学并不简单。 根据我给出的TFR的定义,如果考虑一下,您可以得出这样的结论:例如,如果女性从XNUMX多岁的主要分娩转变为XNUMX多岁的主要分娩,那么计算得出的TFR可能会产生误导。

这实际上似乎正在发生。 从MSN报告中:

报告说,唯一看到出生增加的人群是40-44岁的妇女。 无论是买不起孩子,还是可以接受避孕措施而只是喜欢等待,20多岁和30多岁的妇女继续推迟在美国生孩子。 自1970年代以来,这是一个总体趋势,在数据中出现了一些起伏。

那是什么? 您想知道按种族分类的故障吗? 你太无耻了!

不过,既然您要问,这里是家庭研究所网站上CDC数据的不同摘要: 婴儿胸围:生育率在少数族裔女性中下降幅度最大, 莱曼·斯通(Lyman Stone),16年2018月XNUMX日。

这是正确的。 如果涉及婴儿胸围,您可以带出旧的 “纽约时报” 陈词滥调:“少数民族受灾最重。过去十年来最大的跌幅来自拉美裔,跌幅为2.85%,从2.1跌至36。

不过,拉美裔人起步很高。 原住民(美洲印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民)起步较低,TFR为1.62,在整个十年中下降到1.23。 没人知道为什么。

黑人生育率从每名妇女的2.15胎下降到1.89胎。 非西班牙裔白人从1.95下降到1.72,从一个较低的起点下降了可比。

生育力下降曲线-W640

如您所知,CDC报告对于我们的数学极客是一个宝库。 您可能会获得几个博士学位。 这些数字之外的论文。

例如,有一个政治角度。 正如IFS研究的第二项研究报告的那样,TFR在每个州都下降了,除了北达科他州(神秘地)。

但是,它掉了 更多 希拉里(Hillary)在2016年的州胜过特朗普州。 保守派对自由主义者的嘲讽实际上是在实现,我们最终将只对他们开放。

新的 普遍兴趣下降 在性交中也必须以某种方式发挥这些作用。

立即订购

我经常想一想,一生中看到整个西方世界性欲普遍下降是多么奇怪。 五十年前-我在那儿,读者,我在那儿-当一百个公民中没有一个人有体育馆会员资格,口臭和体臭很常见,而工作场所,俱乐部,运动,学校中的男女不平衡是造成这种情况的原因比今天更显眼,因此更难以了解异性; 回到那些晚安的日子,与所有那些 缺点 和威慑力量,西方人民像兔子一样朝它走去。

相反,今天的年轻人,其buff体完美 牙列和每日淋浴,实际上存在性别隔离 取缔 几乎到处都是-哎呀,我们甚至有 潜艇上的妇女 今天-他们不被打扰。 从报告中 格言 去年七月的杂志,根据 不同的数字集 来自CDC。

在15至19岁之间,有42%的女性和44%的男性报告说过性行为,而51年,这一比例为…60%的女性和1988%的男性。

CDC报告称为 美国青少年的性行为和避孕使用情况,2011-2015年,22年2017月XNUMX日 [PDF],但称为Maxim列 这就是为什么千禧一代比X世代拥有更少性行为的原因实际上,这确实令人震惊……, Zeynep Yenisey,7年2017月XNUMX日。

Maxim是一本“小伙子”杂志,里面充斥着与年轻男性发生性关系的女性图片,如果他们可能会受到打扰的话。

这张图片是用来说明前年龄的女士(索菲亚·罗兰(Sophia Loren) 昨天,今天和明天。

看着人类的品味和行为中这些奇怪的潮流,真是令人着迷。 他们告诉我们什么? 如果有的话,我们应该怎么办?

这是任何有思想的人都可以提出意见和论据的领域。

不过,有一件事很清楚:民主党的胜利者 预测 关于即将来临 选举新人民 移民政策可能会夸大其词。

迷人。 如果我能再度过一次,我会成为 人口统计学家.

2010-12-24dl [1] 约翰·德比郡[给他发电子邮件]写一个 数量惊人 关于各种主题 适用于各种网点。 (这 不再包括 《国家评论》,其编辑发脾气和 解雇了他。 ) 他是 作者 of 我们注定要失败:恢复保守的悲观主义 和其他几个 图书. 他拥有VDARE.com com出版的两本书:异议权 (也可以在Kindle中使用) and 异议人士权利第二卷:《 2013年议论录》.

(从重新发布 威达 经作者或代表的许可)
 
• 类别: 种族/民族 •标签: 人口统计, 生育率, 西班牙人 
隐藏229条评论发表评论
忽略评论者...跟随Endorsed Only
修剪评论?
    []
  1. Singh 说:

    Cock carousel is death of civilizations||

    • 回复: @Ben Sampson
  2. Rational 说:

    SMOKING, DRINKING, FEMINISM AND ALIENISM–WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION.

    Sir, the “minorities” (i.e. colored people) are the majority in this world. Whites are the minority, on a global scale, already.

    Causes of white extinction:

    Smoking: Kills 400,000 whites each year in USA alone.
    Drinking: Russia dying out from drinking. DUI in USA, FUI (flying under the influence by pilots in Russia).
    Liberalism: Waiting past 25 to have children, when white women start becoming infertile.
    Men exploiting young women just for their bodies, wanting to have fun first, and when they are finally ready to marry (if at all), find all the women have been had fun with by other men and are too messed up emotionally to trust any man and too old to have children.
    Feminism: Women wanting careers first, marriage later–well, the body does not wait, but jobs can. Anti-family laws of left wing politicians.
    Alienism: White women falling prey to alien invaders.

    White Race: R.I.P.

    • 回复: @WHAT
    , @neutral
  3. 5371 说:

    2 年出生报告的第 2 页底部和表 2017 中按种族划分的出生人数(TFR 将在稍后提供)显示了“少数族裔受到的打击最严重”的说法是多么具有误导性。

  4. MEH 0910 说:

    Minorities would be much happier not being born.

  5. Here’s the update for 2017 via Cicerone:

    Later on in that thread:

    Using the same method as for the states, here are my TFR estimates (bracket is 2016):
    白人 1.67 (1.72)
    黑人 1.83 (1.83)
    亚洲人 1.68 (1.75)
    西班牙裔 2.03 (2.09)
    全部放弃前。 黑人,西班牙裔现在低于替换

    • 回复: @UrbaneFrancoOntarian
  6. Civilization (city-living) is degenerate. The more intensive the civilization, the more intensive the degeneracy.

  7. m___ 说:

    比例有什么问题?

    正如标题所暗示的那样,不断增长的人口是可取的吗

    生育能力崩溃—少数民族受害最重! 选新人迟到了?

    已实现的生育能力与未实现的生育能力有区别吗?

    消费主义,这是问题的一部分吗? 资本主义只会扩大极少数人的生活,让他们独立繁衍、抚养孩子,作为另一种存在的表达。

    对人口的研究必须是全球性的、具体的,是的,这是一个非常重要的变量,可以包含在任何世界观、理论经济学、可持续性中,就像人类世界以外的地球其他地方一样。

    There is nowhere such an important variable as population issues left out of any theoretical equation, plan, as to where humanity’s future is to evolve. Demographics detailed, and how to interact with them, as a group, likewise as an individual is t-h-e most important variable.

    在心理层面上,数字手淫、玉米糖浆和棕榈油必须影响生育潜力,人口密度、生活条件也是如此。 模糊地,我​​们曾经称之为生活质量。

    调整质量人,而不是数量人,是不是时候将其作为一种道德选择?

    甚至应该考虑男女之间的比例。

    • 回复: @RWS
  8. 这并不奇怪,除了撒哈拉以南非洲以外,各地的出生率都在下降。 这就是为什么未来几十年增长率将保持低位的原因,因为工作的人数将会减少,而他们将主要支持需要昂贵医疗和社会护理的老年人口。 这可能会导致对移民的更多需求,这是增加劳动力的最快方式。

    • 回复: @RWS
  9. Said for years here:

    Mormons, Orthodox Jews, ‘quiverful’ Christians.

  10. George 说:

    I think this is relevant, but don’t know why.

    The evolutionary psychologist explains that attractive people tend to have girls, a trend that is making women far more attractive on average than men.

    http://bigthink.com/videos/why-women-are-more-attractive-than-men

    • 回复: @Rosie
  11. The young adults of today, contrariwise, with their buff bodies, …

    Ha ha ha ! [/Unz] Quite to the contrary, Mr. Derbyshire, this business might actually 说明 things, along with the feminism and all the rest of the possible reasons.

    Maybe a bar graph of obesity should be superimposed* in some fashion on the graph herein. Sorry to have to explain this to any women readers, but a fat body hides the curves that our bodies are interested in. When that interest is gone, what’s the point? It’s just the way Mother Nature works. BTW, even women in fairly good shape have so many tattoos now that it’d turn me off.

    .
    .

    * Really, a line graph of obesity (metric tons) vs. time (years) could be inverted and superimposed, or we could offset the fertility data’s x-axis numbers to the left by, say, I dunno, 9 months, to see if we can get a match.

    • 回复: @Alden
  12. VICB3 说:

    I’m surprised that nobody has mentioned the effects of crowding and the Behavioural Sink on reproduction:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behavioral_sink

    除此之外:

    https://www.google.com/search?source=hp&q=the+mouse+crowding+experiment&oq=THE+MOUSE+CROWDING+EXPERI&gs_l=psy-ab.1.0.33i160k1l2.1316.10256.0.13117.26.22.0.0.0.0.763.4987.0j1j7j4j2j0j1.15.0

    希望这可以帮助!

    仅仅是一个想法。

    维克B3

    • 回复: @m___
  13. Excellent news. Derbyshire, are your Chinese offspring a part of this decline? Have they done their part by sterilizing themselves? If not, you have to have “the talk” with them.

  14. Jamie_NYC 说:

    对于一个既不增加也不减少的稳定人口,您需要每位女性的TFR略高于XNUMX,以允许不生育的人群。

    You need a number slightly larger than two to account for child mortality and the fact that slightly more boys than girls are being born.

    • 同意: YetAnotherAnon
  15. Anonymous [AKA "Wowsa"] 说:

    从我的头顶上:

    – Obesity. Shrinks the mating pool for men in particular.

    – Feminism. Shrinks the mating pool for women in particular (cause hypergamy). Also delays childbirth, due to females being pressured to make partner/PhD/etc. before getting kids.

    – Internet pr0n. Feeling frisky? Can be taken care of with one of the 2 gazillion Tube videos easily available in your phone. Also, loss of libido due to chronic hyperstimulation.

    – Soma supply at record levels. You are never bored (Netflix! Vidya gamez!), so who needs messy sex0r?

  16. Thomm 说:

    Anecdotally, the variance is huge.

    I still know a number of young white families that have 4 kids. These are families where all 4 kids are still under 18. These are in urban areas, and these are people I actually know, not someone from TV (like the Duggar or Bates families).

    The truth is, America has greatly discouraged family formation. Cuckservatives are more to blame than anyone else since they encourage single motherhood due to their pathological denial about the reality of female nature (i.e. ‘a woman only becomes a single mother because the man abandoned her’).

    I wish the black fertility rate had fallen faster than that, though.

  17. Thomm 说:

    Worldwide, the fertility rate has fallen everywhere except SS Africa.

    The plunge in Latin America, South Asia, and even many Muslim countries like Turkey and Iran is nothing short of stunning. Many countries went from 5.0 to 2.0 in just 30 years.

    • 回复: @RadicalCenter
  18. Thomm 说:

    Keep in mind as well that Hispanic-white intermarriage rates are very high, which leads to Hispanic birth rates converging down to the white birth rate (which itself is lowering).

    About a third of all 2nd-gen or later Hispanics intermarry with whites. As do about a fourth of all 2nd-gen or later Asians.

    • 回复: @RadicalCenter
    , @TheJester
  19. Oldeguy 说:

    真的必须在这个上扮演令人讨厌的老顽固。
    The problem ( and I fully agree that’s it’s a very serious one indeed ) is not a decline in interest in sexual intercourse but rather a precipitous drop in the willingness to assume the duties and burdens of parenthood. The same thing has happened before over recorded history and is usually a sign of increased self absorption, decreased community morale and a society in its end stage.
    The West is self extinguishing irrespective of any immigrant “hordes”.

    • 同意: dfordoom
    • 回复: @Ivy
    , @Alden
    , @anon
    , @dfordoom
    , @RWS
  20. Maciano 说:

    约翰,

    TFRs are misleading. Below replacement whites =/= not whites dying out per se. Some white groups are dying out, like liberals; conservatives tend to remain above replacement. This is probably a good thing, long term. Liberals are not tribal enough for modernity to survive as a group. They’ll drag us down.

    Group TFRs also have different tempo because of age at first birth. Religious people have 4 generations in 100 years, secular people only 3.

    Also, group TFRs can accelerate, fast and suddenly, when all the low TFR dead weight is gone. High fertility will return, it is inevitable; these are the only people who will survive.

    • 回复: @Anon
  21. Ivy 说:
    @Oldeguy

    Counter-trend on the way?
    With some uptick in economic prospects, lower unemployment, higher income, more household formations we might see more procreation from a less-stressed populace, even if just a dead-pussy bounce.

  22. Michelle 说:

    It’s porn. All porn! Porn is much easier and more satisfying than hooking up with real women. Men and women are so different, it’s as if we are from different planets really, that though women still crave men, due to ovulation, men have just given up and are content to use reasonable facsimiles thereof.

    https://www.npr.org/sections/krulwich/2013/06/19/193493225/the-love-that-dared-not-speak-its-name-of-a-beetle-for-a-beer-bottle

  23. Thomm 说:

    If the Hispanic birth rate is falling this much, then Ron Unz will turn out to be right about the Hispanic crime rate converging to that of whites.

    • 回复: @Anon
  24. Travis 说:

    During the past two decades, testosterone levels in American men have rapidly declined.
    The testosterone levels of Millennial men is far below Boomer levels. The typical 25 year-old man today has 30% less testosterone than the average 25 year-old in the 1980s…

    These trends coincide with a decline in musculoskeletal strength among young men: In a 2016 study, the average 20- to 34-year-old man could apply 98 pounds of force with a right-handed grip, down from 117 pounds by a man of the same age in 1985….

    • 回复: @Alden
  25. Wazoo 说:

    I think the decline in sex is due to (A) the huge surge in in-line porn, catering to every conceivable taste; (B) feminism, which has persuaded many women to spend their fertile years climbing the corporate ladder; and (C) the war on men, which has produced a generation of low-earning males with few job prospects and no interest in gaining social status or even interacting with people.

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  26. Anonymous [AKA "Jose Allan Guerrero"] 说:

    I am 26 years old and childless, I just don’t have enough money to raise a family, unless I marry a way richer girl than me, also I have a passion for Geography and History, my dream is to travel the world, unfortunately I have only been in Mexico, United States and Panama, so all the money I would save in the future will be for traveling in Europe and Asia, I think is normal falling birth rates, the new generations aspire more than taking care of children, in no time we could travel to the moon thanks to space tourism and I would need more saved money to achieve that.

    • 回复: @Truth
    , @RadicalCenter
  27. Travis 说:

    White fertility collapsed in the 60’s and the fertility rate for whites has remained below replacement levels since 1965. we have less white women of childbearing age today than in 1970…and many of the white females today are mating with non-whites to produce non-white children…

    Census -White pop – Black population
    1970 – 180 亿 – 22 万
    2010 – 195 亿 – 43 万

    bigger issue- the population under the age of 50
    1970 年——162 亿白人——19 万黑人
    2010 年——159 亿白人——37 万黑人

    The actually number of white people under the age of 50 has fallen due to the collapse of fertility which took place 50 years-ago. When Baby-boomers were at the same age as millennials 80% were married while just 30% of millennials are married. A 30 year-old millennial is more likely to live with his parents than with a spouse or partner…

    • 回复: @John Bushcroft
  28. I stopped reading after coming across the Sophia Loren GIF. I became entranced. The weed helped.

    • 哈哈: RadicalCenter, Dan Hayes
  29. @Thomm

    Thank God for them and for us.

  30. @Thomm

    Some portion of the Hispanics are white to begin with, though certainly not a majority. So Hispanic and white are not mutually exclusive categories.

    But your point would stand if we say that nonwhite Hispanics marrying whites will typically go on to have no more than two children on average, instead of the higher number for nonwhite Hispanics in the USA.

  31. Biff 说:

    When White women started looking like the Pilsberry dough boy I started looking elsewhere.

  32. m___ 说:

    In all, too few variables exposed to point to any meaningful correlations. Akarlin detailed some, but not enough to work with. The article is the graph, and another idiot trap.

  33. WHAT 说:
    @Rational

    Yes, except Russia is posting positive statistics for drunk deaths for some years now.

    What we see there is not 凋零, but a protracted ending to a generational drinking binge that began somewhere around 1965-70. Gorby with his hamfisted sobriety measures only made matters worse, but the new gen drinks way less and better quality compared to old, hence this trend reduction.

  34. Dante 说:

    This is encouraging and it is not the only good demographic news related to White/ European fertility levels, In the UK the White birthrate increased by 6% in 6 years from 69.5 % of births in 2008 to 75.6 % of births in 2014 & 2015 and this went completely unreported in the msm though it was published by the Office for National Statistics. The increase was due to an increase in both White British and European births in the country, Also the Polish birthrate has increased markedly since the Law & Justice party came to power after they launched the 500plan to boost their birthrate the same pro fertility plans have been launched in Hungary and elsewhere in Eastern Europe. In Russia the pro fertility policies of the Putin Govt have been extended to 2024 after a marked increase in births there, decade on decade from 2000-08 to 2009-17 births increased by 25.6% while deaths decreased by 14% and there is a renewed pressure on eliminating abortion altogether and the percentage of Russian’s against abortion is growing considerably. In Italy both the Lega & MS5 parties who’ll likely be the next Govt have both made boosting the birthrate a priority by introducing pro fertility policies like those in Poland. The Nationalist trend is good for Europeans as they are all Pro Natalist and anti immigrant. And further afield in European majority Diasporas like Argentina Australia New Zealand and Uruguay they all still have healthy birthrates, So good news all round.

  35. @Travis

    And this shows precisely why “replacement fertility” is a sham. It is masked by the bigger problem of declining white population size. The number of white people of childbearing age today will never be able to make up for the dieoff of baby boomers, even if they were birthing 5 children per woman.

    Hence we can never actually replace the white population. “Replacement ferility” is an impossiblity. We have taken an irreversible hit from 50 years of white female chidlessness. There is no reason to believe fertility will even rise above 2 children per woman ever again. It seems every country that passes the 1.80 children per woman milestone crosses a “point of no return” and never recovers.

    • 回复: @Anonymous Jew
    , @Hildebrand
  36. @Dante

    In the UK the White birthrate increased by 6% in 6 years from 69.5 % of births in 2008 to 75.6 % of births in 2014 & 2015 and this went completely unreported in the msm though it was published by the Office for National Statistics.

    Percentage of births means nothing, especially in England.

  37. This is very interesting! This represents an amazing opportunity for Donald Trump. But he has to act swiftly.

    With falling minority birth rates, he must immediately build the wall and crack down hard on illegal aliens. A low birth rate does no good if you’re still importing millions of Mexicans and Central Americans. Just over 50% of newborns in the USA are white. How many of those are anchor babies to illegal aliens?

    Secondly, birth control must be given in the inner cities, as with abortion. Trump is wrong to defund planned parenthood. Put one in ever corner in the ghetto, I say! Alot of the people there are barely humans, anyways.

    This, plus an improving economy for working class whites could actually improve the demographic situation of the United States. As Anatoly mentioned, the South was barely impacted by lower birth rates (although they also suffer from a high Negro reproduction rate).

    现在是采取行动的时候了。

    • 回复: @Lucas McCrudy
  38. Renoman 说:

    Raising Children is expensive vexing thankless expensive work. The World needs far less people as we don’t have enough resources to support our current population. There are no jobs as automation has eliminated them, low birth rate -Perfect! It may be tough for a while not having sufficient money to pay pensions but hey, simple solution -kill the rich and take their money, they stole it all from us anyway so what’s the problem? Diversity breeds crowding and War, fuck that shit, leave the immigration off the table and just make do with less for a while, it will straighten itself out soon enough.

    • 同意: manorchurch
  39. @Dante

    Any idea how the white birthrate in the UK is doing in 2017? And is that figure White British, or just European? Anything below 80% White British is unacceptable, though obviously any improvement is extremely welcome.

    The Brits are aided by the Czech and polish immigrants who fuck like rabbits in better economic conditions. Even in czechia now the TFR is 1.67 and improving. Poland is around 1.45 but is looking to increase again this year.

    • 回复: @Dante
    , @RadicalCenter
    , @Dante
  40. @Anatoly Karlin

    Cicerone 有一些很棒的信息,但他们的 Twitter 提要太短了! 他是否将其发布到网站或带有更多图表的内容?

    • 回复: @Cicerone
  41. The Prog/SJW take on this will just be the usual – more immigrants needed. There’s an unlimited supply and they will vote dependably. Meanwhile, robots are breeding too! Despite the fertility bust, we will have massive surplus labor in the US within a generation.

  42. A big problem is that people my age buy into the “hookup culture” meme. In theory it might sound fun and liberating – but in reality it doesn’t exist. Chasing this idea leads to frustration, degeneracy and ultimately dissatisfaction.

    Don’t get me wrong, a few guys can pull it off. But if you’re not in the 1% of guys, you’re not getting laid very often from hookup strategies. If you get any, it’s a massive amount of time and effort for 10 minutes of weak sex.

    As I discovered through experience, having a committed relationship gets you way, way, way more sex (assuming you’re not waiting until marriage). It gives both partners time to explore, love, and discover what works for them. Lots of sex leads to a higher sex drive, and more masculinity and vitality. Once you have deep sex enough times, you will inevitably start to think about reproduction.

    Millenials have little sex because few are in relationships, as they have been sold a false bill of goods. Boomers had more relationships = more sex and eventually more children. Hookup culture and feminism are the problem. Women and men are miserable but don’t realize it.

    • 同意: Travis
    • 回复: @Alden
    , @RadicalCenter
  43. Roboticitis. Terrible disease.. replaces humans with masses of sophistication made of light steel.

  44. Alden 说:
    @Achmed E. Newman

    I almost never see tattoos, especially on people under 35. I think it’s gone out of fashion

    • 不同意: RadicalCenter
    • 回复: @Achmed E. Newman
  45. Alden 说:
    @Jamie_NYC

    Child mortality? What century do you think this is?

  46. Alden 说:
    @Oldeguy

    First reasonable comment I’ve seen in this thread.

  47. Alden 说:
    @Travis

    If testosterone is way down, shouldn’t crime go way down? And shouldn’t the violent black teen males be better behaved.?

    • 回复: @anon
    , @Anonymous Jew
  48. n230099 说:

    The whole notion that earth belongs to humanity forever is crazy. There’s no particular reason for us to be here over anything else.

  49. Dante 说:
    @UrbaneFrancoOntarian

    Unfortunately I don’t have figures for 2017 yet but can likely find 2016 figures from the ONS official site so I can check for you. As to your first point the White birthrate is the British & European and the British is 66% and European 10% and I would expect the share to rise still further. And your correct on your second point as Polish Tfr in the UK is over 2.1 and their number of births has increased every year. Thanks

  50. Alden 说:
    @Dante

    Government help in boosting fertility and births is all very well. But are those governments doing anything about affordable housing and family living wage secure jobs so the children can be raised?

    • 回复: @Dante
  51. Truth 说:
    @Anonymous

    I just don’t have enough money to raise a family… my dream is to travel the world, all the money I would save in the future will be for traveling in Europe and Asia

    ‘Bout says it all.

    One could of course replace, “travel” with “play video games”, “buy weapons” “refubish old motorcycles” or whatever.

    • 回复: @Tommy Robinson
  52. anon[508]• 免责声明 说:

    The war on men is finally bearing fruit. Congratulations ladies!

    In future all babies will be born in laboratories, because everyone will be either gay or transgender. Except Muslims, they’ll still have babies the regular way.

    But no worries they will be designer babies, parents will get to pick their gender, hair color, eye color, predicted height, IQ, and rid them of all the bad genes that cause addiction, cancer, alzheimer, dimentia, diabetes etc.

    • 回复: @Alden
    , @myself
  53. anon[508]• 免责声明 说:
    @Alden

    Testosterone is going down because of obesity.

    • 回复: @Travis
  54. anon[508]• 免责声明 说:
    @Oldeguy

    Urbanization plays a big part as well. As more young people move to urban areas, housing becomes increasingly expensive. In the West Coast and Northeast, you have the added problem of rich foreign buyers esp. from China bidding up property prices. Combined that with high importation of foreign labor on H1b to depress wages, young people can’t afford to buy homes until well into their 30’s. Few people who live in apartments can afford to raise children.

  55. Alden 说:
    @Renoman

    I agree with you. Sometimes I have the impression that most of the men who comment here don’t have children.

    It used to take 20 years to raise a child. God only knows if today’s 5 year olds will ever move out of their parents house.

    A fair number of White engineers end up teaching high school math for the security once they have kids.

    The 3 year contract layoff another 3 year contract layoff is fine for a single person but it’s too insecure for a father.

    The only time our government helped families was the 1945 to 1970 period. But that was only to build a prosperous consumer society

    But the capitalists rebelled against decent wages and secure jobs and the 1965 immigration act set American workers right back to the late 19th century when the capitalist scoured Europe for cheap and desperate labor

    Only difference is the imported labor is now non White.

    No one is going to have children when they don’t have prospects for a secure decent paid job

    Check what happened to fertility during the 1930s depression. It plummeted from the prosperous 1920s. And that was when birth control was iffy and a lot of people didn’t use it for religious reasons

    No money no babies. And all the grumpy old childless bachelors blaming women won’t help.

    So many more jobs will disappear. Robots are being developed to replace nurses It will start with nurses aids and then move up the ladder.

    A lot of X rays are transmitted directly to India and read by radiologists there. I’m sure more medical jobs will be taken over by robots and tech

  56. Alden 说:
    @UrbaneFrancoOntarian

    Even 40 years ago studies were made showing that married and living together couples had sex 2 or 3 times a week . While singles even in a relationship had much less sex.

  57. Alden 说:
    @anon

    宝宝们都将是美丽的高个子金发和蓝色,中等身材,大眼睛和完美的五官

    查看大学报纸上的卵子捐赠广告。 他们想要的只是 5'7 或更苗条的自然金发浅棕色头发并提交 SAT 分数。

    如果你是一个矮胖的metizo,他们不想要你的鸡蛋

    • 回复: @cornbeef
  58. neutral 说:
    @Rational

    Those things mentioned are really just symptoms of the root cause. The root cause is the jewish control over white (formerly white) nations.

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  59. ZPG. Does this mean an end to hysterical stories about Hispanic teenagers breeding like flies? Is nothing sacred? Next we will hear that they are learning English, or pouring into California’s universities. The horror.

    • 回复: @DFH
    , @Achmed E. Newman
  60. Anonymous [AKA "Agrippa"] 说: • 您的网站

    对于一个既不增加也不减少的稳定人口,您需要每位女性的TFR略高于XNUMX,以允许不生育的人群。

    This would be stability only in a limited sense. If we earned as many dollars per year as our grandfathers, would we say income was “stable” over time?
    Mutation is more inevitable than inflation. Simple numerical stability would yield a population with constantly declining genetic quality. To be stable in both number and quality, a lot of extra children have to be born, so that there exists a subset of them that matches both the number and quality of the previous generation.

  61. Factorize 说:

    The TFR collapse could soon become a fertility moratorium. A forthcoming article in Nature Genetics is expected to reveal a substantial portion of the Genetics of Educational Attainment (and by extension intelligence).

    It is possible that this article will finally alert the mainstream that an IQ uplift is now on the horizon. The rational fertility strategy would then be to postpone childbearing until this technology had matured. The TFR could then move towards 0.0.

    • 回复: @myself
  62. fnn 说:

    Peak Oil liberal James Kunstler points out that “toxic masculinity” will always be with us:
    http://kunstler.com/clusterfuck-nation/you-think-its-all-about-guns/

    I will venture to say — against the tide of current sexual politics — that adolescence is much tougher for boys these days than it is for girls. Every boy in one way or another faces his archetypal hero’s journey, the hard-wired seeking to become powerful in one way or another, to accomplish something, to prevail over adversaries, to win the goodies of life. This country used to be a place where young men had many useful and practical paths to follow in enacting that eternal script.

    That has changed utterly in a couple of generations. Young men are being out-competed by young women who enjoy the advantage of being hard-wired to cooperate with others in the hive-like corporate workplaces that require tractable drones who will just follow instructions. The smart ones can easily avoid pregnancy, too, and still enjoy sex and all the exciting social games it entails.

    • 回复: @Paleo Liberal
  63. Mr. XYZ 说:

    : Ironically, shouldn’t minorities themselves celebrate the decline in minority birth rates?

    After all, if less minorities are born, then less minorities will have to suffer as a result of White privilege and systemic racism.

  64. @Jamie_NYC

    I noticed that too Jamie-NYC, the Derb mis-stated the reason slightly. The “people who do not reproduce” are already included in the metric so that is not the reason. It is as you state, premature death rates and slight male/female misbalance. Any nonzero incidence of female mortality under age 40 or so will have an effect since that will lead to a bias in the fertility rate. Child mortality is perhaps a misnomer in this context.

  65. MW 说:

    Nitpick: Replacement TFR’s aren’t above 2 because of those who don’t reproduce. The non-reproducers show up in the numbers just fine, as a zero at every age.

    It’s because not all women survive to the end of their childbearing years.

    • 回复: @Anatoly Karlin
  66. Dante 说:
    @Alden

    Yes those measures are in the policy documents of the Govts I mention, You can Google them and if you can’t read them you can translate them. Thanks

  67. Notice how much the Native American population is collapsing.

    Adding onto this, Native Americans are the group most likely to marry outside their ethnic group — even more than Asian females.

    Which means, we are seeing the continued destruction and replacement of the original population. Replacing the original stock whites and the slave-descendant blacks will take a little longer.

  68. DFH 说:
    @Frederick V. Reed

    Anything to justify your miscegenation

  69. @fnn

    有趣的文章。 谢谢。

    I attended college in the late 70s and early 80s. At that time, there were more men than women in college.

    I taught college from the mid-80s to late 90s.

    The whole school structure is geared far more for the female mind than the male mind.

    MAny more ladies than men in college. This was especially true amongst the black population. Even so, the black male students I did have were more likely to be Caribbean. Very few black American males, even when I taught a class at a Negro College one term.

    Not nearly as much disparity between Asian males and females.

    By the late 90s, even science classes I taught where the students were almost all white had more women than men. And I gather the problem has gotten worse.

    (Except engineering schools. My son went to an engineering college, and the guys greatly outnumbered the ladies).

    这是什么意思?

    It means we have, to a great extent, a lost generation of men. We have quite a few young men with not much of a future.

    That sort of situation very often ends badly. That sort of situation generally ends in war, or great civil unrest (such as the Cultural Revolution in China, where the PLA would supply weapons so that rival gangs of young men could kill each other off, as well as any adults they felt like killing).

    India and China have large surplus populations of young men. The US has a surplus population of young me with no future.

    The results may be interesting in the worst sense of the word.

  70. gwynedd1 说:

    I would want little to do with Hispanic women in the US as it is . Given I sat next to a stunningly beautiful young Colombian women not too long ago on an airplane, and found it a very pleasant way to pass the time speaking with her, it seems to be the problem is an acquired one. I do not even want to think about the morbidly obese thing she might become outside her native region.

    However if I were also a Hispanic man , I would also likely be horribly obese myself. The depleted levels of energy and testosterone would probably result in me fapping on the couch once a month.

    Searching for at least on cause I offer that they find each other repulsive.

  71. @Alden

    Whaaat? Not where I live. It seems that the largest area of tattoo coverage is on the flesh of people from 25 to 40. (Though coverage increases as skin area increases, taking me right back to the point of my earlier comment.)

    Really, I’d be glad if that is the trend, Anon-257. It’s gonna take a while if this stuff is tailing off, as, well, they stay on forever. Taking small ones off is possible, I’ve heard, but not easy. BTW, I don’t mind some small hearts or butterflies or anchors on guys that were in the Navy – that sort of thing. It’s the ones that cover a significant portion of a limb, belly, etc. that are a real shame and a sacrilege.

  72. @Frederick V. Reed

    What is “ZPG”? (I’m sure it’ll be obvious once you tell me.)

    From what I’ve read, it’s the 1st generation immigrant populations that have the highest fertility rates. That means illegal Mexicans and C. Americans in particular (along with the Moslems). It’s still not a good thing for us though, and, yeah, they were learning English, but California wants to remedy that again (and mucho kudos to our host who I believe was instrumental in the removal of that bilingual-ed crap… but …. it’s baaaaack!)

    • 回复: @Peter Johnson
  73. @Alden

    Crime has gone way down, especially from the peak years around the 70’s and 90’s. Note sure how it breaks down racially, but I believe the Black-White crime ratio has been pretty stable since Blacks were “freed” during the Civil Rights era.

    Pinker has a pretty good explanation in “Better Angels”. He doesn’t cite testosterone, but it could certainly be a factor.

    • 回复: @John Bushcroft
  74. @John Bushcroft

    re “point of no return”:
    Except if the country is like Japan et al and only has minimal immigration. Assuming we continue on our current path, Japan will still have a chance over the next several decades, while many Western countries will be finished. A population decline, like Japan is experiencing, is manageable and even reversible on a long enough timeline. Going from 90% White with a 10% Black underclass to 50% White with a 35% Brown/Black underclass is irreversible. In the latter situation, the best we can hope for is semi-peaceful separation into separate nations. Realistically, we just become a colder version of Brazil.

    • 同意: RadicalCenter
  75. Rosie 说:
    @George

    The evolutionary psychologist explains that attractive people tend to have girls, a trend that is making women far more attractive on average than men.

    Fortunately for men, we’re not obsessed with looks, so we overlook your relative ugliness.

    https://techcrunch.com/2009/11/18/okcupid-inbox-attractive/

    • 回复: @Sollipsist
  76. @MW

    Correct, but even more accurately, in the modern age it is mostly because there are 1.05 boys born for every 1 girl.

    In the era when mortality – especially maternal mortality – was far higher, replacement level TFR was around 2.5.

  77. Sollipsist 说:
    @Achmed E. Newman

    I assumed he was being ironic. My staff and clientele is largely under 30, and there’s not a single uninked person among them. “I’m sore from my new tattoo” is an excuse heard virtually every week.

    Disney and Harry Potter themes seem to be common, which throws something of a monkey wrench into the classic primitive -> sailor -> outlaw -> punk rock evolution of the practice.

  78. Sollipsist 说:
    @Rosie

    That IS good news. Things have never been so good for the ugly guys; the good looking guys are too busy with each other to provide much competition, and the unattractive women who also don’t care about looks tend to pair off nicely. End result: ugly guys and beautiful women with an unhindered path to each other, just as nature intended 😀

    • 回复: @Rosie
  79. Rosie 说:
    @Sollipsist

    True. We’re fine with ugly dudes. We only have a problem with royal ugly dudes older than our grandpas.

  80. @Anonymous

    You don’t have enough money to raise a family, but you expect to travel the world? Priorities, my friend.

    • 回复: @UrbaneFrancoOntarian
  81. notanon 说:

    whatever they’re putting in the food supply to feminize men doesn’t effect 1st generation immigrants – only their kids

    the high birth rate among new 1st generation immigrants will still be enough – unless there aren’t any.

  82. derb is really really slow at times, doesn’t he realized this also proves his doom and gloom to be bullshit, scare mongering?

  83. @RadicalCenter

    It’s okay, from his name he is hispanic. There are far too many hispanic babies already. Don’t poke the bear…

    • 回复: @RadicalCenter
  84. Cicerone 说:
    @UrbaneFrancoOntarian

    我保证将来我会尝试在 Twitter 上发布更多内容! 😉

    • 回复: @manorchurch
  85. anon[217]• 免责声明 说:

    The sensationalist headline is quite misleading, and annoying. Fertility is slightly lower for minorities, but hardly “collapsed”. Hispanic birth rate esp. is still above 2.0. Cry me a river.

    Earth can celebrate the day birthrate of all non-whites dip below that of whites. Until then this planet is headed for doom.

  86. @UrbaneFrancoOntarian

    “.Just over 50% of newborns in the USA are white. How many of those are anchor babies to illegal aliens? =

    According to the Pew Hispanic Center, roughly 8-10% of all births are to illegal aliens and since we call assume nearly all illegals are non-white, the white share would go up by large single/even double digits if despicable cucks Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell finally passed legislation ending this practice. Almost equally frustrating is the refusal of Trump to use his bully pulpit to push the matter the way he did back when he was trying to get our votes/

    • 回复: @Colin Wright
  87. @Achmed E. Newman

    An acronym for Zero Population Growth.

    • 回复: @Achmed E. Newman
  88. @Achmed E. Newman

    Not so long ago in the UK, tats were for sailors (iirc some Royals with naval service had them), bikers or criminals, and male earrings for sailors or gypsies. Now they’re all over the place, maybe more on women than men.

    I was called for jury service recently, and about a third of the sixty-odd prospective jurors (chosen for three or four trials) had visible tattoos.

    A tattoo on a pretty girl is like that moustache on the Mona Lisa. On the other hand, they’re signifiers (as a woman smoking was sixty years back) that the girl is what used to be called ‘fast’ (today’s equivalent is probably ‘DTF’).

    • 回复: @Buzz Mohawk
  89. myself 说:
    @anon

    But no worries they will be designer babies, parents will get to pick their gender, hair color, eye color, predicted height, IQ, and rid them of all the bad genes that cause addiction, cancer, alzheimer, dimentia, diabetes etc.

    So in the future, 质量 将取代 数量?

    • 回复: @myself
    , @RadicalCenter
  90. theMann 说:

    Anybody else think that an overall decline in fertility and a massive upward swing in std’s might be related? And, tactfully as possible, especially for minorities?

    Does our modern diet intrinsically lower testosterone or is it also a lack of exercise in the teen years? All those women wee-weeing estrogen into the environment can’t be having an effect, right? And no reason to worry about the electronic soup we live in, that wouldn’t cause sterility at all……

  91. Hildebrand 说:

    Large part of decrease in TFP is caused by tempo effect that is change in timing of fertility. By measure of developed countries US has relatively low mean age of first birth and now it is converging. What is important, completed fertility for last known cohorts is above replacement:

    • 回复: @Intelligent Dasein
  92. ChrisZ 说:
    @Achmed E. Newman

    Achmed, I have a hypothesis that tattooing (at least as practiced today) is a form of self-mutilation. In earlier ages, various forms of mutilation–tearing out hair, clawing your skin, ripping clothes, e.g.–were associated with grief. Degrading your appearance, ruining your attractiveness either temporarily or permanently, was a way of expressing grief, dealing with it, or signaling to the public that you were under its sway. Maybe in this sense the tradition of wearing black for mourning was a low-grade form of self-mutilation, or a hedge against people resorting to more extreme forms of it. Similarly the strange dietary contagions that cycle through our culture–anorexia on the one hand, obesity on the other–may originate in some sort of grieving. Perhaps there’s something biological about the connection between these kinds of physical distortions and deeplt negative emotional states.

    In any case, as I grow older and more observant I’ve come to appreciate how many people carry a burden of grief in their lives–deep sorrow, disappointment, or a sense of anomie–that they are simply not equipped to deal with. Tattooing has become an approved way of distorting your body, and so perhaps it’s been adopted for this grieving purpose by the present generation. I may be wrong about this; but I can hardly look upon a person with significant tattos in their body without thinking that here is a deeply unhappy person.

    • 同意: manorchurch
    • 回复: @Anonymous
    , @dfordoom
  93. Factorize 说:

    One aspect of the gender divide that has received inadequate attention is the asymmetric nature of expectations. A few of my high achieving friends did not survive university. They were all male. The stress that is present in many male dominated subjects such as engineering can be overwhelming. In some of the more extreme of these subjects, it seemed as though 100% of the students failed. Guys are hardwired to seek out a mission, even if there is essentially no chance that they will achieve their intended purpose. With this mentality, many extremely intelligent males are lead to believe that they have failed. For example, because they did not prove string theory etc. .

    Given this, I was quite surprised while web surfing to find completion rates of an online university. 100% completion rates for some of their courses! Notably these courses were typically female areas of study such as nursing. These graduates would then have a clear pathway to enter a high paying job. Noting the different definitions of success that are being applied to males and females might help explain the apparent gender balance that now exists on campus.

  94. myself 说:
    @Factorize

    It is possible that this article will finally alert the mainstream that an IQ uplift is now on the horizon.

    I agree that we are on the verge of extensive genetic engineering. This is a world-wide phenomenon.

    My take on it is that the lower the population’s current IQ, the more they will benefit from the IQ-enhancement technology.

    The lower your IQ, the more you’d want to avail of the technology for your children and descendants.

    Look for nations to have national IQ enhancement programs, and to subsidize genetic enhancement for their populations.

    At present, many accept jobs because of the health-care benefits.

    In the future, genetic enhancement at company expense will be one of the most desired perks on offer. THAT is the future!

    • 回复: @Factorize
    , @Travis
  95. @Anonymous Jew

    Except if the country is like Japan et al and only has minimal immigration. Assuming we continue on our current path, Japan will still have a chance over the next several decades, while many Western countries will be finished.

    Japan doesn’t have minimal immigration anymore (it’s ratcheting up out of necessity) but they have zero chance of replacing their peak population on their own after 50 years of fertility decline. Which also means they have no opportunity to solve their debt crisis or their other problems such as rural decay without large scale immigration. There’s no realistic way to invision a future world where males have restored patriarchal dominance and forced women to breed the necessary amount of children to breathe life back in to first world countries, short of a total civilization collapse, which would cause untold numbers of deaths due to nuclear power plants going prompt crtical everywhere, food shortages, etc.

    • 回复: @Peter Johnson
  96. myself 说:

    Not meant to be a thread-jack, but genetic science is just the tip of the iceberg.

    The advances in Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, non-genetic enhancement (like ultra-efficient organs, carbon-nanotubes for bones, neural-pathway tweaking etc), and Nano-Technology are pretty breathtaking.

    Some countries are going full-steam ahead with these research areas, and are expediting deployment.

  97. @Anonymous Jew

    >Note sure how it breaks down racially, but I believe the Black-White crime ratio has been pretty stable since Blacks were “freed” during the Civil Rights era.

    Whites committed a far greater number of crimes in the 60s and 80s than they do today, another function of the number of young white people being higher in those days. The black-white crime disparity is largely a matter of black Americans being younger than white Americans due to a slower (until now) decline in fertility over the 20th century. People forgot about the days when whites were the most criminal.

    • 回复: @RadicalCenter
    , @Randal
  98. myself 说:
    @myself

    To be clear, I am only stating the evident thinking behind fewer but more enhanced children. As to the merits of said thinking, I am agnostic.

  99. myself 说:
    @Anonymous Jew

    Realistically, we just become a colder version of Brazil.

    And why should this be in any way surprising?

    Neo-feudalism and patron-client relationships are the overwhelmingly dominant societal pattern of the Americas, (overwhelming in terms of the populations that live under such systems). Seen from Tierra del Fuego to the Rio Grande, and in every heavily minority locale across the Ubited States and Canada.

    Wealth has little to do with it, it’s probably cultural. Even Canada has become divided along ethnic lines. The United States is even further along the same path.

    Even IF the ethno-cultural percentages stabilize at current levels (and there is ZERO sign that’s happening), America is ALREADY too racially divided. We will become even more divided in the future, until we go full-on segregation once more – what was old will be new again!

    Interestingly, you know who else transitioned from a somewhat meritocratic to a quasi-feudal society?

    That’s absolutely right!

    Rome, shortly before it fell completely, never to rise again.

    A disturbing parallel.

    • 回复: @myself
  100. myself 说:
    @myself

    Sorry for the typo – meant Un国家

  101. davebarnes 说:

    Immigrants will fix this problem.

  102. TheJester 说:
    @Thomm

    Matches made in Heaven …?

    Having known a number of Hispanic boys and their families over the past decade, I noticed that the high school boys seemed to have had the “hots” for white girls, including my daughter.

    Let me posture a reason: Just as in the Caribbean among blacks, there is pressure in the Hispanic mestizo communities to “white” the family to improve their social and economic status, something denied them in the strict caste-based cultures of Latin America. Otherwise, how can one explain Hispanic males with an obvious Amerindian heritage who have never dated a Hispanic female and have no intention of ever doing so?

    I have also known a number of white males who were very interested in Hispanic females. The latter tend to be warm, feminine, and very interested in family formation with white males … perhaps their version of “whiting” the family. Hispanic females are a breath of fresh air when compared to white feminists who seem predisposed to be hostile toward anything and everything white and male.

    Not to be left behind, the white feminists are also finding their place … sort of. Flying in the face of the classic female practice of hypergamy, they are showing a new and heightened interest in black males. It now seems 德严格 for white professional women to sport mulatto children in the restaurants and shopping malls. This is “virtue signaling” of the first order. Indeed, I’m assuming that they feel empowered and reassured to be able to find someone with whom to share stories about white male oppression and their common victimhood.

    So, everybody wins … sort of!

    • 哈哈: Clyde
    • 回复: @Rosie
    , @RadicalCenter
  103. Anon[452]• 免责声明 说:
    @Thomm

    Well duh , his IQ is like 1,488 or something.
    Btw, are we talking Hispanics or just people with Hispanic sounding names??

  104. Factorize 说:
    @myself

    Thank you for replying, myself! There has been a notable silence about the approaching IQ upgrade on unz. Clearly the entire apple cart will soon be upset: Time to prepare.

    I tend to think that at least initially this will be more about divergence than convergence at least over the medium term especially between developed and developing nations. Typical middle class Americans will have the necessary resources to genetically enhance their children. This will be the new industry of the 21st Century. America could truly be the leader on this. Yet, for most developing nations one would expect that they could lag. They have certainly lagged with rolling out genetic technology for single gene disorders. In some of the least developed nations, it is terrifying to imagine what could happen if IQ enhancement were introduced amidst extreme poverty and ongoing warfare. The potential for a child with 300 IQ to develop within such a context should concern everyone on this planet (especially considering the likely planetary scale range of any weapon system that such a child might be able to invent).

    Yes, the returns on investment would be so enormously large that there likely could be a wide range of interests that might step forward and offer to provide the financing. Amplifying human potential by 10 fold in every generation is simply too large of an opportunity to pass up.

    What is your timeline on this rolling out? My guess is that the time horizon of the Genetic Singularity has been reached. Total fertility collapse in developed nations should now be expected within 2 years. The TFR could move close to 0.0. I have already heard of a poster to a blog deciding to postpone childbearing until the IQ uplift occurs. This would seem to me the rational choice. Those children born immediately before the uplift might simply have no future. The entire generation might need to be placed onto public assistance for life. There is no possible way that a generation could reasonably compete with another generation that had a 1 SD IQ advantage.

    • 回复: @myself
    , @RadicalCenter
    , @Travis
  105. anon[217]• 免责声明 说:

    Birth rate is highly correlated with women’s education level. As women’s education level rises, birthrate tends to go down. Few college educated women today have more than 2 children, if they marry at all, Mormon’s excepted. Birthrate by white women has been below replacement for decades, because as a group they are the best educated and career oriented. Now black and hispanic women are finally catching up.

    There has been more than a few articles in msm about the plight of college educated black women in finding a mate. Most college educated black men want to marry white women, and college educated black women do not want to date non college educated black men, understandably. Hispanic women are having the same problem. Black and hispanic women are getting college degrees at a far higher rate than their men. The difference probably is hispanic women have a better chance of finding a white husband than black women.

  106. Rosie 说:

    Birthrate by white women has been below replacement for decades, because as a group they are the best educated and career oriented.

    不是真的。

    http://www.slate.com/blogs/better_life_lab/2017/11/09/the_stem_paradox_why_are_muslim_majority_countries_producing_so_many_female.html

    • 回复: @anon
  107. Rosie 说:
    @TheJester

    So, everybody wins … sort of!

    The White “feminists” whom you hate, hate, hate (to quote our old friend Whiskey) are indispensable to our future.

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/children-intelligence-iq-mother-inherit-inheritance-genetics-genes-a7345596.html

    • 回复: @Thomm
    , @anon
  108. Travis 说:
    @anon

    even adjusted for obesity the testosterone levels are down significantly from 30 years ago…another culprit is less men are doing manual labor and less men are working each year….back in the 1960s 95% of men worked, while today just 75% of men have jobs.

  109. Travis 说:

    White births keep dropping in America

    Decade – – – Births………White Births
    1950-’59 – 40,100,000 – 35,100,000
    1960-’69 – 38,700,000 – 32,000,000
    1979-’79 – 33,400,000 – 25,700,000
    1980-’89 – 37,500,000 – 24,500,000
    1990-’99 – 39,900,000 – 23,000,000
    2000-’09 – 41,000,000 – 22,000,000
    2010-’19 – 39,000,000 – 20,000,000

    Europe, despite their lower fertility , still has more white babies born each decade

    over the last decade 20 million whites have been born in America and another 40 million whites were born in Europe while 170 million Chinese were born in China over the last decade….

    • 回复: @Ben Sampson
  110. Anonymous [AKA "Joseph the Discalced"] 说:
    @ChrisZ

    Agreed. The subtext on a tattoo for a millennial is, Let me tell you about my parents’ divorce. And the subtext for ink on a Boomer female is, Let me tell you about MY divorce.

    • 回复: @ChrisZ
  111. In 1914 Europeans were 25% of world population. Today 5%. The only endangered minority in the world today is whites.

    • 同意: Travis
    • 回复: @Travis
  112. Thomm 说:
    @Rosie

    The White “feminists” whom you hate, hate, hate (to quote our old friend Whiskey) are indispensable to our future.

    没有东西会离事实很远。

    65 pretty girls who were ruined by feminism :

    http://blonlee.com/ugly-feminists/

    Thanks for proving that White Trashionalism and radical feminism are almost identical ideologies.

    • 回复: @RadicalCenter
    , @manorchurch
  113. myself 说:
    @Factorize

    What is your timeline on this rolling out?

    While I try not to be prone to wild speculation, I will try to be somewhat specific. Disclaimer: I am not a professional in any related field, just someone who reads.

    I think in 10 years, on the outside, most genetic defects and diseases will be eliminated in newborns. So being prone to cancer, alzheimer’s, parkinson’s, dwarfism, giantism etc. – mostly gone.

    After that, I don’t know. CRISPR and gene-editing are extremely powerful and precise.

    There is now a study being conducted in which they are aiming to sequence the genomes of one million very high IQ individuals to isolate the genetic bases of intelligence – obviously to be able to then apply the findings in order to deliberately engineer very high IQ people. That is just the first step.

    Beyond that, we are probably looking at beings who are no longer, strictly speaking, human. The human brain processes information in certain ways, but artificial intelligence does so differently, and possibly with more efficiency.

    So the obvious move would be to engineer people whose brain processes are closer to that of AIs rather than mere hyper-genius humans. Better still to combine the human intuition and knowledge synthesis ability with the blazing speed of computers.

    IQ enhancement is by far the trickiest and most difficult of the challenges. If we manage that, everything else – athletic ability, looks, eye/hair/skin color – is trivial in comparison.

    Above, I mentioned that the future beings would be quite unlike us. Well, consider that with genetic science, even our traditional racial concepts would be challenged. Future humans might resemble no one who walks the earth today – instead, they may be some, probably aesthetically very pleasing, combination of what their parents consider the best features of the ENTIRE human genome.

    What ethnicity would you ascribe to someone like that? Not anything that exists at present.

    As to the precise “moment” of genetic uplift, I don’t think we’ll pin it down. It’s not a moment, it’s a continuous, ongoing process. Which means that children born after 2030 will be superior to their parents, but children born in 2033 will be better still, and those born in 2035 even better. And so on.

    There is no reason to think that genetic science is a “one and done” phenomenon. There won’t be a moment of uplift and then few developments afterwards – it will just keep going.

    And that’s just on the “meat” side of things. To be blown away, read up on the advancing field of AI, and the prospects of IQ enhancement via direct human-machine interface.

  114. @Singh

    “It’s fascinating to watch these strange currents in human tastes and behavior. What do they tell us? ”

    John has no ideas?
    Come on…………..

  115. @Travis

    interesting eh Travis! you gonna get swarmed and swamped!

    you better learn to love BBQ duck and braised dog with soy sauce and a sprinkle of sesame seed oil to bring up the flavor

  116. “To be blown away, read up on the advancing field of AI, and the prospects of IQ enhancement via direct human-machine interface”

    we are the Borg……….

  117. @Hildebrand

    It seems that your “last known cohort” terminated in 1962, right in the thick of the baby boom; and if that was barely above replacement, then the projections since then are totally out of whack. Just look at the crude birth rate and the crude death rate. Depopulation is obviously occurring.

    • 回复: @Hildebrand
  118. ChrisZ 说:
    @Anonymous

    Thanks Joseph. Appreciate that you managed to say in 30 words what it took me over 200 to say.

    (I had to look up the meaning of your moniker, and I’m going to start using it to describe my chronically barefoot son. Thanks again.)

  119. @UrbaneFrancoOntarian

    Is merely two or three children “f—-ing like rabbits”? Or are the Slavs in the uk actually having big families?

  120. The young adults of today, contrariwise, with their buff bodies, perfect dentition, and daily showers, with sex segregation actually outlawed almost everywhere

    The Beautiful Ones of the New HumanRat Utopia.

  121. @John Bushcroft

    Compare rates of murder, rape, aggravated assault, and the like per 1,000 of the same-age-group population, and see if you find higher per capita black violent crime rates even adjusted for age. I’ll look for these stats, as you should have before you made the ridiculous claim.

    • 回复: @John Bushcroft
  122. @TheJester

    Hispanic girls in the USA tend to be warm and feminine? Yeesh. Maybe outside Los Angeles area. Maybe not.

    • 回复: @TheJester
  123. @Factorize

    Typical middle-class Americans are in debt and have a negative net worth excluding their homes. Many, many millions have a negative net worth overall because they don’t own a home or are underwater on their home.

    There is no reason to think that they will be able to afford genetic engineering. They will be more worried about finding a safe place to sleep, getting enough food, power outages and brownouts (coming in LA and coming to the rest of you thereafter), and avoiding violence at the hands of the even poorer, angry, poorly assimilated, nonwhite MAJORITY.

    • 回复: @Factorize
  124. @UrbaneFrancoOntarian

    Excellent points, sir.

    And what exactly are the one percent of hookup guys even achieving? None of it perpetuates their genes, their family name and traditions, their culture and mores, to the new next generation. (Unless they’re African-like scum who knock women up and abandon them, which leads to their next generation ending up disproportionately incarcerated, prematurely dead, drug-addicted, homosexual, and all the other charming things that happen so often to kids with no steady dad around.)

    My parents and their friends didn’t screw like animals or “play the field” for a lot of years before marrying and settling down. And I hardly think their generation is less manly or less normal than the current ones..

    • 回复: @UrbaneFrancoOntarian
  125. @Renoman

    Yes, the planet doesn’t have enough fresh water, arable land, open space, clean air, etc., for this huge population with an industrial lifestyle and personal combustion vehicles.

    But does the world become better or even worse if the generally more intelligent, more productive people have zero to two children and the generally less intelligent, less productive have many children?

    We don’t simply “need fewer people.” We need fewer people bred from most of the world’s countries and peoples, and more from normal European, Russian, and Japanese people. No violence needed to accomplish this, just stop sending food and medicine and other aid to Africa and India — and to their kinsmen here in our countries — and focus all resources on our own peoples instead.

  126. @Renoman

    Killing the super-rich and taking their property? The proceeds won’t last long with such a large and increasing number of poor and struggling to take care of.

    And your definition of rich will differ a lot from the definition favored by truly poor people, many of whom hate and resent you for racial, cultural, and economic reasons. You’ll find that some of US here would be considered rich, and you won’t have time to explain to the murderous looting mob (or the heavily armed and soulless government thugs who come for your property) that you are really middle-class.

    How about merely confiscating the houses, vehicles, and excess wealth of the high-income earners in Hollywood “industry” and in the finance “sector.”

  127. @Cicerone

    我保证将来我会尝试在 Twitter 上发布更多内容! 😉

    Oh, good, you are such a humanist. We must all emulate your ideals! Let’s put everything we can think of on Twitter, and gush effusively. We will save this country yet! We will never run out of new emojis!

    Sardonicisms aside, why does no one see the widespread sickness — pathological social dysfunction in the sense of what “social” really means — in millions of no-status individuals devotedly “following” celebrity individuals? It is a form of mass conversion from the American ideal of the ruggedly independent individual, to cotillions of touchy-feely-weepy cuddlers-with-friends.

  128. @John Bushcroft

    Japan is still crowded with expensive square foot housing costs, so a few more decades of negative population growth will improve the quality of life for them. There is no problem with their debt overhang since they own 100% of their debt on a net basis, and own much US debt too due to trade-surplus-linked saving. There is no foreign-owned-debt overhang. They need to make some economic adjustments to deal with their ageing demographic profile, but that involves simple Economics 101 market-based adjustments. Immigration on the other hand would be disastrous for them and their quality of life.

    • 回复: @John Bushcroft
  129. @Thomm

    65 pretty girls who were ruined by feminism :And one(?) fucking moron who spent more than five minutes compiling that.

    Get a life, dude.

    • 回复: @Anon
  130. @myself

    And that’s just on the “meat” side of things. To be blown away, read up on the advancing field of AI, and the prospects of IQ enhancement via direct human-machine interface.

    I’ve become more dubious myself – have you looked up the redshift research done by Wuhan University(Wang, Li, Zhao & Dai)? It heavily supports the idea that there is some form of quantum involvement in what we consider as intelligence, which seems to be a reasonable explanation for how the brain appears to achieve its computations despite using vastly less energy than comparable mechanical versions, lending some credence to what was previously seen as kooky ideas by Sir Roger Penrose.

    There’s probably something we can do to improve the brain mechanically – “mechanical telepathy” is an interesting candidate, but direct IQ enhancement seems like it might still be a ways off.

  131. @myself

    I think in 10 years, on the outside, most genetic defects and diseases will be eliminated in newborns. So being prone to cancer, alzheimer’s, parkinson’s, dwarfism, giantism etc. – mostly gone.

    Question: from whence cometh these cures? Genetic medicines dispensed in huge volumes, at cost, throughout the population?

    It seems unlikely. Pharmas are in business to make money, and virtually all pharmacorps are headed by some version of a Shkreli. All pharmas are aided and abetted, vigorously, by Congress-critters.

    • 回复: @Daniel Chieh
    , @Lucas McCrudy
  132. @manorchurch

    评论员 我自己 lives in China; he’s probably thinking of subsidized neonatal care there. It would be logical from a purely financial viewpoint as well and probably justifiable elsewhere since essentially its the argument for preventative care(less) over remedial care(more).

  133. who said depopulation is occurring?

    it most surely is taking place. what else to expect with a minority capitalist population driving global society..a minority population that is contiguous with capitalism..owns capitalism, is capitalism.. but also with a religious world view/ideology that is entirely supremacist and 110% intolerant of the lives of others…faced with the development of internal capitalist contradictions that yields to no other solution relative to their interest but global depopulation, and genetically engineering to ensure their total control, any rump remainder population they think they need to maintain

    the future of humanity will be shaped, is being shaped, by the resolution of, or the evolution of capitalism..the working out of the basic capitalist contradiction, between those who exploit, and the exploited.

    it seems quite simple and straightforward to me:

    what are the capitalists going to do with the people in job-eating advanced technological times?

    can advanced technology be held back to ensure ‘full’ employment to maintain some sort of balance between owner and worker?
    I dont think so. positive human evolution and humanely purposed advancing technology go hand in hand..hold back one hold back the other!

    I mean it goes on and on…Capitalism is a no win situation for humanity. it is either capitalism evolves into some kind of cooperative democracy in which the enhancement and on-going development of society becomes the focus of human activity and purpose..or the minority interest wins and dominates… in which case humanity is screwed.

    if the capitalist religious minority wins out, human society with the current technological level and its perpetual advancement..they turn human society, the human future, into an unimaginably grotesque monster mash, a monumental, limitless hell no dystopian I have seen yet has come close too, relative to my own imaginings of how this will be..not 1984, Brave New World, Lord of the Rings etc. but far worse

    the history of north east Africa… what they call the middle east… for 70 relentless years and on-going, gives us only a small idea of what is to come..of the relentless focused drive of the religious capitalists. I mean the horrific human future taking shape is nothing for the relentless collective mentality that gave us, and keeps giving.. Disney, talking cars, mouses, turtles etc… talking burning-bushes, a blonde resurrected Jesus, killed by his own father in the human interest pheeew!: That gave us Hollywood, constant and extraordinarily inventive if cruel and mass murderous global political games, and a whole lot more of that quality… for a thousand years and counting

    this is simply what is involved in the population issue..indeed in all human issues. it is either we end human exploitation by humans and build a real social democracy, focused on its own development, or be collectively exploited to the hilt: which would drive humanity to extinction in horrific, dystopian shape.

    the Borg aint nutten to what we face as a species…by our own hand

  134. Anon[349]• 免责声明 说: • 您的网站
    @Maciano

    So many smart commenters here, and you even seem like one but then you drop this retarded idea that liberals by default produce liberal children (and viceversa w conservatives). Thats not how DNA works That’s not even how nurture works, m oron, what is this the breitfart comment section?

    • 回复: @Maciano
  135. Factorize 说:
    @myself

    myself, thank you for replying! There has a great silence about this approaching disruption. I think that it is critically important to start the conversation NOW! This going to happen; some might not be overly happy about it, though we need to prepare for what will certainly be a dramatic social reorganization: the Genetic Singularity.

    I find it so incredibly frustrating that we are talking about a 10 year time horizon for the genetic architecture of the illnesses you mentioned to unlock. The rate of return that could be achieved by dedicating serious resources to these problems now would be large. For whatever reason the political process has yet to engage with this issue.

    I am surprised that a high GWAS was thought worthwhile. It is currently thought that much of architecture of IQ is based on commonly occurring SNPs.

    For the timeline question I am also interested in what your thoughts are on the topic of a pre-uplift fertility collapse. My rough feel is that embryo selection for IQ enhancement is now feasible. This might offer 10-20 IQ points. Those with substantial resources might achieve 50 points. Once this is widely understood in the community, a complete fertility would be a rational response. This could occur within 2 years. While you are surely correct that the technology would then continue to improve, parents-to-be might want to wait until the first stage of IQ optimization occurred (for example, finding all the commonly occurring SNPs). After total fertility collapse I suspect everyone would be highly focused on restoring fertility as quickly as possible. It would not be unexpected in such circumstances that the GWAS might move to a real time reporting system. I suspect that a profound sense of crisis would be present.

    There are so many other topics of interest related to the uplift that have went unexplored. For example, when will there be a medical school crisis? Doctors who are now studying to treat children with a range of medical issues might not have any long term employment prospects. How will we be able to entice people into medicine once it is clear that there will be no long term future for those who pursue this calling?

    The effects on society will also be profound. As it is now, all the positives naturally float up the social structure. Beauty, intelligence, wealth, … all tend to co-segregate. What happens when the driving force IQ can truly be present anywhere? How much will the real estate of the wealthy then be worth?

  136. Anon[349]• 免责声明 说:
    @manorchurch

    What is so threatening to you about it? I think it helps raise people’s awareness on the destruction caused by feminism looking at individual cases.

    • 回复: @manorchurch
    , @Thomm
  137. TheJester 说:
    @RadicalCenter

    Try Northern Virginia. We know quite a few Hispanic females. In Northern Virginia, it’s almost impossible not to since immigrants gravitate to high-paying urban areas … and we live in the richest county in the United States. My sample includes numerous Hispanic friends and many young Hispanic girls who were in our daughter’s social group in high school and junior college (our daughter has since married and moved away).

    Hence, I stand by my claim … “warm and feminine”.

    Aside: Note iSteve’s satirical post about the NYT’s claim about immigrants allegedly repopulating America’s small towns. I stand with iSteve … nonsense! Loudoun and surrounding urban counties are a virtual “United Nations”. If you want to educate your children about the world and its diversity, don’t go on a world tour, send your children to a local public school … or wander through a local Costco.

    We have to drive deep into Pennsylvania to find a traditional American town that reminds us of where we grew up. Surprise! Marginal wealth … few blacks … few Hispanics … no Hindi … no Chinese … no BMWs … and young people don’t have to speak Spanish to work in the local fast food restaurants.

    • 回复: @Rosie
  138. Factorize 说:

    myself, I am not sure whether you wish to confirm or deny the claim of your Chinese residency, though this would offer a very useful insight if in fact you were located there. From what I have read, China appears to have unequivocally endorsed the concept of genetic enhancement. In Western nations, it is no longer a question whether can IQ embryo selection can be done, but should it. Currently, the prevailing opinion, socially and probably legally is that it should not be.

    Such a stance does not seem to have any medium term plausibility. Once it is clear that IQ enhancement has occurred anywhere in the world, rejecting such enhancement would no longer be possible over even the short term. The rapid scramble to the airport as entire nations depopulated could not continue for much more than a few days. It is all too clear that IQ enhancement along with selecting against a range of illnesses would create a dramatically different world. Perhaps the UN will need to be sent in to those nations that refuse to join the uplift and continue to suffer all the consequences that are plainly reported in our daily newscasts.

  139. Anonymous[107]• 免责声明 说:

    he’s probably thinking of subsidized neonatal care there. It would be logical from a purely financial viewpoint as well and probably justifiable elsewhere since essentially its the argument for preventative care(less) over remedial care(more).

    Ah, noted. Still, a process entailing generation-long treatment at the genetic level, per each affliction selected for elimination, and only in China, as I suspect western pharmaceutical companies would fight communitarian health efforts tooth-and-nail throughout the USA and Europe.

  140. @manorchurch

    Through the genetic screening of embryos… but those embryos have to be conceived through IVF which (currently) costs $10k+ per cycle and presently only a dozen or so eggs can be harvested from a women’s ovaries at a time using invasive and painful extraction methods. But in the (near) future you might be able to turn skin cells into gametes (eggs or sperm) and then you could easily create LOTS of embryos and then cull all the ones with “bad” genes. Or you could just screen fetuses for those cancer, Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, etc. genes and use selective abortion- but destroying genetically undesirable fetuses is certainly more controversial than discarding unwanted embryos sitting in a lab.

    • 回复: @manorchurch
    , @Factorize
  141. @Anonymous Jew

    …the best we can hope for is semi-peaceful separation into separate nations. Realistically, we just become a colder version of Brazil.

    我们已经 ,那恭喜你, a colder version of Brazil, where a brown/white divide characterizes urban environments on, or close to, the sea coast. For that matter, factions in southern Brazil are agitating for separating Parana, Santa Catarina and Rio Grande do Sul into a separate country.

  142. @Anon

    What is so threatening to you about it? I think it helps raise people’s awareness on the destruction caused by feminism looking at individual cases.

    Understood. Also understood is your failure to perceive “feminism” — as you choose to term it — as simply another mechanism of social change produced by a long-term and irrevocable transition from an agrarian, tribal society to an industrialized factional society.

    All I can say, frankly, is “Pay attention!” You are 20 years behind the curve.

    • 回复: @Thomm
  143. Hildebrand 说:
    @Intelligent Dasein

    “It seems that your “last known cohort” terminated in 1962, right in the thick of the baby boom”

    Do you know what is “cohort” mean? Dates in this figure is the years of birth of MOTHERS, not the years of birth of children. The last known cohort is not 1962 but 1975 who almost complete their reproductive career very recently.

    • 回复: @Intelligent Dasein
  144. @Lucas McCrudy

    But in the (near) future you might be able to turn skin cells into gametes (eggs or sperm) and then you could easily create LOTS of embryos and then cull all the ones with “bad” genes. Or you could just screen fetuses for those cancer, Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, etc. genes and use selective abortion- but destroying genetically undesirable fetuses is certainly more controversial than discarding unwanted embryos sitting in a lab.

    I am willing to bet real money that won’t happen within an average lifetime — call it 70 years. Too many people, too many conflicts, too few resources.

    • 回复: @Factorize
  145. Dante 说:
    @UrbaneFrancoOntarian

    Hi there I have birth stats for 2016 in England and Wales for you, 71.8% were White births or around half a Million and while I don’t have race based stats for Northern Ireland and Scotland we can assume the vast majority of births in both nations are still to Whites especially in Northen Ireland where Natural population growth is the main driver of growth so with 24 thousand births and 54 Thousand in Scotland I would estimate around 75% of all births are White ( British and European ). If I find out 2017 I’ll post. Thanks

  146. Hildebrand 说:
    @5371

    少数族裔出生的高比例是由于积极的人口增长势头:西班牙裔和黑人人口的更大比例由育龄者组成。

  147. Thomm 说:
    @Anon

    Cuckservatives like Manorchurch are pretty-much just water-carriers for ‘feminism’. Part of it is due to his incel status.

    He has no awareness of how feminist laws have destroyed families, separated fathers from children, and sent innocent men to jail and even suicide.

  148. Thomm 说:
    @manorchurch

    Like most cuckservatives, you are stunningly ignorant.

    You seem to have no idea how many ‘feminist’ laws are in direct violation of the US constitution, and are specifically designed to destroy families.

    Your incel status is the reason you place women on pedestals.

    • 回复: @manorchurch
  149. @Peter Johnson

    Economics 101 can’t defy the laws of energy. If there is no one around to pay the debts of the previous generations, they don’t get paid.

    • 回复: @Peter Johnson
  150. Hildebrand 说:
    @John Bushcroft

    There is no reason to believe fertility will even rise above 2 children per woman ever again.

    No, there is reason to believe in it. USA have a significant ultra-religious population of Haredi Jews and Old-Order Anabaptists. Although they still constitute a small proportion of an American population, they have very high fertility rate. If they will not began demographic transition (which is unlikely but not impossible — see Hutterites who have accepted contraception and whose fertility already declined from 10 children to under 5), since the beginning of 22nd century their population will be large enough to influence fertility rate in whole country.

    And, as I already wrote, completed fertility of last known cohorts is above replacement. There is also TEMPO-ADJUSTED total fertility rate for US (https://www.humanfertility.org/cgi-bin/country.php?country=USA&tab=si):

    [更多]

    1980 1.997
    1981 2.006
    1982 1.995
    1983 1.988
    1984 1.960
    1985 1.969
    1986 1.994
    1987 1.989
    1988 1.952
    1989 2.000
    1990 2.038
    1991 2.067
    1992 2.183
    1993 2.225
    1994 2.254
    1995 2.220
    1996 2.183
    1997 2.145
    1998 2.190
    1999 2.262
    2000 2.334
    2001 2.328
    2002 2.387
    2003 2.309
    2004 2.148
    2005 2.065
    2006 2.119
    2007 2.242
    2008 2.295
    2009 2.355
    2010 2.333
    2011 2.207
    2012 2.171
    2013 2.194
    2014 2.161

  151. Travis 说:
    @Factorize

    we are not close to upgrading the IQ of our offspring…first we will expand embryo selection (currently embryo selection is utilized to avoid some genetic diseases and select the sex of a child). Wealthy Parents will have the ability to select the best embryo of the dozens they create in vitro…but even if such methods of in vitro fertilization were less costly and available to the poor, most Americans would select for Height, eye color and athletic ability over an embryo with a slightly higher IQ but having the wrong eye color.

    The typical parent with an IQ of 100 does not want children with an IQ greater than 110. They certainly will not pay thousands of dollars to gain 10 IQ points. They will continue to procreate the natural way and use the thousands of dollars they saved to go to Disneyland…but if they were able to select a child for traits such as height and beauty they would mortgage their home to get a pretty daughter or an athletic son.

    • 回复: @Factorize
  152. @RadicalCenter

    Compare rates of murder, rape, aggravated assault, and the like per 1,000 of the same-age-group population, and see if you find higher per capita black violent crime rates even adjusted for age. I’ll look for these stats, as you should have before you made the ridiculous claim.

    Doesn’t work that way. These are different generations we are talking about.

    • 回复: @RadicalCenter
  153. @Thomm

    Like most cuckservatives, you are stunningly ignorant.

    But not ignorant of the language and the proper use thereof, dick. I am not a “cuckservative”, asshole, because I am not a conservative, make no claim to conservative viewpoints, and am in general of the opinion that most people laying claim to the “conservative” label are simply insufferable, small-minded little fucks who need a good ass-whipping.

    You seem to have no idea how many ‘feminist’ laws are in direct violation of the US constitution, and are specifically designed to destroy families.

    If they violate the Constitution, it is the obligation of legislature and the courts to find it so. Don’t preach to me about Constitutional provisions, you ignorant jackass.

    Your incel status is the reason you place women on pedestals.

    Got it, you hate women. How unusual — never happens in your pack of limp-dick fools.

  154. @manorchurch

    If Thomm ever left unz.com, and ceased posting a continuous stream of anti-white and anti-female garbage, perhaps he would finally get some.

    Of course I’m dating a beautiful white woman right now, the stuff of dreams for a smelly Hindu nationalist like him. What would I know.

    • 回复: @manorchurch
  155. @UrbaneFrancoOntarian

    Agreed! On second thought, he should spend his life traveling and never have children. Thank you.

  156. @John Bushcroft

    We CAN indeed calculate a rate of various crimes among people grouped by race and age, if race and age stats are available for the perpetrators.

    They would not be different generations.

    We would be comparing, say, white Americans aged 18-29 with African-“Americans” of that same age group, for the same year.

  157. @myself

    It seems likely that only a very small percentage of parents will be able to afford this genetic tinkering.

  158. @UrbaneFrancoOntarian

    Of course I’m dating a beautiful white woman right now, the stuff of dreams for a smelly Hindu nationalist like him.

    只有一个?

  159. Factorize 说:
    @RadicalCenter

    America has this enormous amount of wealth. It is the one economy that the entire world wants to market to. Often when people allude to their supposed poverty it is quickly revealed that this is within the context of a 100k+ family income. My guess is that IQ uplift will simply displace other priorities. It is not entirely unreasonable to suspect that the next speculative bubble will be related to IQ enhancement. People will rationally choose to live in tents and have children with 150 IQ than live in mansions with 115 IQ children. Such a speculative frenzy at least will produce a lasting and substantial improvement in our community.

    Considering how truly massive such rates of return will be there will probably be a wide range of financial institutions and others that will be more than willing to provide the financing for such enhancement. The recent housing crisis in the US has lead many to question the moral priorities of those in the financial services industry. Providing the financing for the most rapid IQ enhancement in the history of humanity could help change public opinion about the industry. Increasing IQ will not be an empty exercise in creating a bubble without creating any actual wealth. In the modern world intelligence is the driving factor of wealth generation. Going directly to the fountain of wealth creation will have a truly extreme effect on the world of our future.

    • 回复: @RadicalCenter
  160. anon[204]• 免责声明 说:
    @Rosie

    The article talks about women getting STEM degrees in Muslim countries. White women may be getting STEM degrees at a lower rate than white men, but they are getting college degrees at a higher rate than men. They are also the most successful group of women in the work force compared to black, Asian or hispanic women. Most of the women in upper management positions are white.

  161. anon[204]• 免责声明 说:
    @Rosie

    The White “feminists” whom you hate, hate, hate (to quote our old friend Whiskey) are indispensable to our future.

    It’s true boys get their IQ from their mothers, because they only have 1 X chromosome and it comes from their mothers. But girls have 2 X chromosomes and they could also get their intelligence from their fathers. Among people I know the smartest boys are often boys of mothers with STEM degrees.

    Most women with STEM degrees are not SJWs or even liberals. They are too busy working and too smart and logical to be liberals. Feminist SJWs are usually liberal arts majors who can’t count, and not much brain.

  162. anon[204]• 免责声明 说:

    I think a lot of the success of Jews have to do with their women. Jewish women as a group are far better educated and successful professionally even compared to white women (see Kevin MacDonald’s 选择的人). Smart mothers give birth to and raise smart children. Before Tiger Mothers we used to joke about Jewish mothers, like how they all want their sons to grow up to be doctors, and their daughters to grow up married to doctors.

    But recent trends suggest this is eroding because Jewish women are now consumed by feminism and narcissism, and are turning gay or marrying black men in drove. Perhaps that’s why a lot of Jewish men now marry Asian women, for preservation of their smart genes. Asian mothers are the new Jewish mothers.

  163. AnotherDad 说:
    @Jamie_NYC

    对于一个既不增加也不减少的稳定人口,您需要每位女性的TFR略高于XNUMX,以允许不生育的人群。

    You need a number slightly larger than two to account for child mortality and the fact that slightly more boys than girls are being born.

    Thanks Jamie. Surprised myself to see the demographically aware Derb make this mistake. And was scanning down in the comments to see if I needed to make the correction. Actually not just strictly “childhood”, but any mortality before being through your reproductive years.

    And it’s now really is only a tad higher than 2 now in the modern West because very few people actually do die young.

    This is more than just an academic concern, because when you see those abysmal TFRs in Western nations–1.4, 1.7, 1.2, 1.6–they do include the large and growing number of white women who in fact do not have children. (Two of my girl cousins are in this boat.) The ones who do have kids–are often–though not in the really low TFR places–averaging near replacement. But not having nearly enough kids to overcome the high level of childlessness and delayed single child, child bearing.

    One my ideas that i encourage white conservatives, traditionalists, nationalists to “get out there” is that “two is not enough”. Two kids from people who are actually forming families and getting busy is not actually “replacement”, because so many other people never get there or are not able (physically) to get it done. “Two means death”. Civilizational death.

    If you basically have your act together–are smart, and decent personality traits, have a job and your finances in order, are healthy with good genes, i.e. basically have your ducks in a row–then three or four or more kids should be your target. (Three should just be default.) Because you and your spouse are making up for the losers, screwups, non-starters, romantic failures/misfits, fertility failures. You are fit and having children is the most important thing you’ll do to move our civilization forward–heck just to keep it alive!

  164. Factorize 说:
    @Travis

    I am not sure whether I agree with the idea that IQ uplift is now on the distant horizon. It is not entirely clear to me whether such enhancement is already underway in China. Merely selecting 1 in 10 embryos gives you up to a 15 point enhancement. No current population has an IQ greater than 1 SD above Greenwich mean. It should be clear to all how much of a difference 1 SD can have on society. America is fractured by just such an amount. It might at some be realized that we can longer afford not to make this investment in those within the 20% of most disadvantaged people in the community.

    Even doing a simple first round of genetically selecting against all diseases would have an overwhelming effect on our society. Such selection would certainly create essentially a new human species. The developing world might not be able to achieve a similar upgrade for many decades into the future.

    One thing that should be remembered is that the meaning of 100 IQ will shift through time. As you noted that people typically do want their children to be considered normal above all else. Having a child with mal-adaptively discordant IQ likely would not be understood to be of great benefit. Yet, normal will now shift through time. There will be a great interest in remaining normal as the uplift occurs. It can be reasonably predicted that in the not too distant future children with only IQs of 200 will be placed in classes analogous to those reserved today for those with developmental disabilities and people will feel great anguish related to the expected life trajectories that such children would face.

    I am not sure whether beauty or athleticism would work in the same way in the future. Up till now all the positives in the community wound up at the same place. You know that you have hit the favored class of people when you have colocated the intelligence, wealth, beauty, health etc. All the good is magnetically drawn to one central location. IQ uplift will override all of this. For me, all of my family genetic health concerns could probably be selected out after a generation or two. I am not sure whether I would then find any great advantage in say continuing to select against depression risk, or autistic risk etc. . Once achieving the standard level deemed normal for happiness within my community I am not sure what great advantage might be derived for selecting yet more happiness etc . However, with intelligence, one could well imagine that people will pursue uplift until they had achieved close to an optimal IQ. That might be in the range of hundreds of points.
    People with IQs in that range would have incomes of perhaps hundreds of millions of dollars per year.

  165. @YetAnotherAnon

    Agreed, tattoos are abominations.

    如果她是 fast, she has a tattoo in a place where you can’t see it until she’s undressed. I remember a yellow smiley face with the caption, “Thank You. Come Again!” right next to the Delta of Venus.

    That shouldn’t interfere with breeding, however.

  166. Factorize 说:
    @manorchurch

    I do not think many people are aware of where the research is right now. Nature Genetics has a forthcoming article in which they identify 37 SD of Educational Attainment. To put in this into some
    context 37 SD of IQ is 500 points. This means that 10 points of IQ enhancement based on embryo selection should at this time be understood as being feasible at reasonable expense with existing technology. IQ uplift has now arrived. There are some specific identifiable people within the community in which offering them publicly financed IQ enhancement technology for their future children would offer a compelling investment. It soon might be realized that we can longer afford not to make this investment.

  167. Corvinus 说:
    @neutral

    “Those things mentioned are really just symptoms of the root cause. The root cause is the jewish control over white (formerly white) nations.”

    Actually, the root causes are numerous, with “Jewish control” only lamented by conspiracy theorists.

  168. Factorize 说:
    @Lucas McCrudy

    $10k for possibly 10 IQ points offers extraordinary value! If 1 IQ point equals $1,000 in income, then the cost of the enhancement would be rewarded in the first year of earning. People might feel it is no longer worthwhile to save for their children’s education, only their IQ enhancement. It is not clear whether the vast quantities of resources that are devoted to education actually increase psychometric G. That is after many hundreds of billions of dollars spent and several decades trying.

    Of course we are only talking about a primitive technology that has been in use for nearly half a century. For CRISPR to move through clinical trials it could take decades and decades. Embryo selection is a standard procedure used in reproductive clinics. When sperm or egg selection is developed than all bets are off. If one could develop a process that selected the best sperm and egg among 100 million, the IQ enhancement would be dramatically magnified. Perhaps you are now moving toward a 100 IQ increase in the first generation. There would be no associated moral squeamish involved in gamete selection as it would not be reasonable to suggest that gametes are in some way alive.

  169. Stem degrees and SJWs…all these details, manipulations etc to increase brain facility and so on..what do these have to do with fertility collapse and why..and what can be done about it, in the sense that that fertility collapse is not a good thing?

    我一点都不明白!

    Fertility collapse appears to be the product of depopulation efforts by the powers that be in society. the air and water are poisoned..so is the food. the medicines and health systems are geared to maximise death of those who use medicines and get into the health systems….

    everywhere one looks there is the sense of danger for human. little if anything appears set up to enhance human chances in life only to decrease them. in response to this article I expected to see analysis of what appears to be systematic attack on the population. I have seen little of that

    有趣。

  170. Corvinus 说:
    @Wazoo

    “(B) feminism, which has persuaded many women to spend their fertile years climbing the corporate ladder”

    Which is in line with the American value called liberty.

    “and (C) the war on men, which has produced a generation of low-earning males with few job prospects and no interest in gaining social status or even interacting with people.”

    Perhaps this generation ought to pull themselves up by their bootstraps if they perceive themselves to be “victims”. Nonetheless, this “war on men” meme is blown out of proportion.

  171. Corvinus 说:

    “To throw in some hard stats, let’s visit a report that the CDC released last week, documenting the decline in sexual activity among teenagers: between the ages of 15 and 19, 42 percent of women and 44 percent of men reported having sex, relative to a significantly higher 51 percent of women and 60 percent of men in 1988.”

    Mr. Derbyshire, let us provide some context here.

    “The overall decrease in the prevalence of ever having had sexual intercourse during 2005–2015 is a positive change in sexual risk among adolescents (i.e., behaviors that place them at risk for human immunodeficiency virus, STI, or pregnancy) in the United States, an overall decrease that did not occur during the preceding 10 years. Further, decreases by grade and race/ethnicity represent positive changes among groups of students who have been determined in previous studies to be at higher risk for negative outcomes associated with early sexual initiation, such as greater numbers of partners, condom non-use, teen pregnancy, and STI (1–3). More work is needed to understand the reasons for these decreases and to ensure that they continue.”

    https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/66/wr/mm665152a1.htm

  172. @AnotherDad

    Very accurate. I’ll often see many white families out with 2 or 3 children. But then you see the number of white trash, welfare recipients, and urban “professional” (corporate drones) women with no children and not planning on having any.

    I would like to have three white children at the minimum, possibly four. I may have to content myself with two, as the woman is so powerful in these situations.

    Keep in mind, larger families are not only good numerically but also culturally. Larger families mean a larger sense of belonging and community which is sorely needed for many whites. One of my “regrets” is that I had so few relatives and family members.

    • 回复: @Factorize
  173. njguy73 说:

    等待, 格言‘s still around? I thought it went belly-up years ago. Who the hell’s buying it? Guys who don’t have cable or a laptop?

    我知道 went online years ago, and 详细信息间谍 are gone. Looks like the ’90s aren’t dead yet.

  174. Factorize 说:
    @UrbaneFrancoOntarian

    I am very interested in your thoughts on IQ uplift. In your view have we now reached the Genetic Singularity Event time horizon (i.e., Should fertility now be expected to collapse imminently as people postpone child-bearing in order to avoid children that would need to receive life-long guaranteed incomes? A 1 SD IQ disadvantage would make this nearly certain). Would investing $10-20k per child for genetic enhancement (IQ, disease selection) be something that you would consider?

    • 回复: @UrbaneFrancoOntarian
  175. njguy73 说:

    Maxim is a “lads” magazine, filled with pictures of women that young men would be having sex with…if they could be bothered.

    No, more like “women that young men would be having sex with…if they were actors, musicians, or athletes.” You want to bang Blake Lively, Katy Perry, or Minka Kelly? Be Ryan Reynolds, John Mayer, or Derek Jeter.

    Me? I could never sing or hit a curveball. But I could have been a good smarmy douchebag…

  176. oh oh! point taken?

    哈哈哈

  177. Travis 说:
    @myself

    CRSPIR technology will not be be widely used over the next 10 years….it would require women to have their eggs removed and then a round of in vitro fertilization with the altered DNA….not very practical and few Americans would pay $15,000 to have a baby with a slightly high IQ probability. They would be more likely to pay the extra $15,000 to get a taller, stronger , more athletic son with an IQ of 105 than have a shorter, weaker son with an IQ of 115.

    even today we do not know the causes of the majority of those diagnosed as Mentally Retarded…about 30% of cases of mental retardation are caused by hereditary factors….
    Usually the cause of mental retardation cannot be determined. Often the cause is due exposure to a virus or bacteria while in utero or caused by lack of oxygen to the babies brain during delivery…

    • 回复: @Daniel Chieh
  178. @Factorize

    Well I have to admit that I don’t know enough about that possibility. I tend to focus more on improving current demographics through feasible and practical measures, rather than on science fiction.

    That’s not to put down your area of interest. That could totally upend the demographic game. But I am too pragmatic, and not much of a visionary. I can devise and implement strategies to remedy current problems, but not to prevent future ones. Reactive, not proactive, yada yada yada.

    But if such things came true people like John Derbyshire (and myself, though this is a hobby and not my job) would be put right out of business that’s for sure.

  179. @Travis

    This is an incorrect understanding of CRISPR(it sounds like the Blade Runner version of genetics, actually). CRISPR can be administrated postpartum.

    https://qz.com/1185488/chinese-scientists-used-crispr-gene-editing-on-86-human-patients/

    • 回复: @Travis
  180. @RadicalCenter

    Hooking up with somebody satisfies the immediate desire for sex. It gives men a feeling of masculinity and being “alpha”.

    It does not, however produce white children and women will immediately rush to the abortion clinic if they do get pregnant.

    Ironically, men don’t have to be in a rush to reproduce. Men can also be much happier as bachelor’s their whole lives. Women are the ones spurning men for their careers and cats, and also ending up stressed and miserable.

    Don’t get me wrong, I’m not a prude nor am I a misogynist. I don’t see anything wrong with sex, or even “playing the field”, as you put it, for a time. The problem is that these millenials are 35 and still drinking like fish and still trying to stick their increasingly limp dicks into increasingly worn vaginas.

    At a certain point it’s time to grow up and realize that hookup culture doesn’t lead anywhere, that’s my point.

  181. @AnotherDad

    One my ideas that i encourage white conservatives, traditionalists, nationalists to “get out there” is that “two is not enough”. Two kids from people who are actually forming families and getting busy is not actually “replacement”, because so many other people never get there or are not able (physically) to get it done. “Two means death”. Civilizational death.

    I’ve got nothing against that, but I don’t think “two means death” would be correct if it weren’t for massive immigration and a higher fertility rate in other races/groups.

    It’s like the bear thing. I don’t have to be faster than that angry black bear. I just have to be faster than the other guy running away from him. What I mean is, an ABSOLUTE smaller population is inherently a GOOD thing, but a RELATIVELY smaller population vs. other “tribes’ is bad. Exhibit A would be Japan.

    Anyway, it’s most important to get the women thinking about having more babies, as they control the deal on that, and they 已可以选用 are the “bottle neck” (so to speak ;-}

  182. Thomm 说:
    @manorchurch

    If they violate the Constitution, it is the obligation of legislature and the courts to find it so. Don’t preach to me about Constitutional provisions, you ignorant jackass.

    Don’t project your cowardice onto others. You are hell-bent on being a water-carrier for feminism. The extent to which you minimize that as the primary problem in America (and the real reason that white men are disengaging from white women) exposes your cowardly nature.

    BTW, a ‘male feminist’ like you is always a creepy predator in disguise. It is a very reliable indicator, really. Heartiste says this often.

    • 回复: @manorchurch
  183. @Hildebrand

    No kidding. That’s exactly what I meant.

  184. Maciano 说:
    @Anon

    Well, you’re partly right. I was careless, since I wrote the response on my phone.

    Political attitudes are moderately heritable, and lefties get fewer children on average. Both statements are factually true.

    This isn’t to say that lefties can’t convert conservatives to leftism. It simply means that lefties tend to die off, while conservatives tend to leave more children.

    • 回复: @Anonymous Jew
  185. Travis 说:
    @myself

    The low IQ populations will be much less likely utilize technology to improve the IQ of their children,…they are more likely to use the technology to produce stronger, bigger more athletic male children.

    Low IQ women today can easily choose high IQ males to mate with…yet they do not. They avoid them and choose to have children with strong alpha males, often high school dropouts who will never provide four them or marry them…

    If Low IQ females were given free high IQ sperm they would avoid it. But they probably would choose to be inseminated by sperm from NBA athletes or celebrities like Justin Timberlake and they would probably pay thousands of dollars to acquire sperm from NBA athletes and celebrities…

    If America wanted to increase the IQ of our population, the fastest method would be sterilizing all women on welfare…and encouraging poor females to get inseminated with sperm from high IQ males…but this is not politically feasible..

  186. Travis 说:
    @Daniel Chieh

    The article you linked describes using CRIPSR gene editing on immune cells in the blood, not altering someones genes to cure a genetic disease….CRISPR technology must be used prior to fetal development to increase IQ, as the foundation of the brain is formed during the first 12 weeks of development…CRISPR technology will not be able to make low IQ babies smart after they are born..nor will it have the ability to reverse autism or Schizophrenia because these diseases are the result of fetal brain developmental problems that effect the structure of the brain as it is being formed in utero..

    we have identified over 200 genetic causes of retardation…yet 70% of the mentally retarded have an unknown cause or non-genetic cause such as a virus or fetal alcohol syndrome…… in utero diseases and lack of oxygen during birth are significant causes of retardation…Already in America the majority of mentally retarded embryos are aborted when discovered , yet still 1% of white babies born over the last 15 years are mentally retarded because we most cases cannot be identified although we have the ability to identify 200 genetic causes of retardation within the first 10 weeks of pregnancy…Retardation has yet to be eliminated via abortion , mostly because we cannot identify most causes of retardation…thus we cannot prevent the thousands of retarded babies from being born because we cannot identify the reasons they are retarded…CRISP technology could theoretically prevent many abortions if the embryos are selected before being implanted but this will have little effect on the number of mentally retarded white babies, since most are already aborted today.

    • 回复: @Daniel Chieh
  187. RWS 说:
    @m___

    极好的观察。

    为什么,除了延长不可持续的福利国家的寿命,任何有思想的人都希望增加已经不堪重负的地球的人口?

    • 回复: @manorchurch
  188. @Thomm

    Don’t project your cowardice onto others. You are hell-bent on being a water-carrier for feminism.

    And you are a smarmy little low-testosterone gamma male, creeping about the trashrooms of apartment complexes, sniffing out used menstrual products.

    Just for the record, you disgusting little dirt bag, I observe the actions of women, as groups or single individuals, in the same way as I observe the male side. Your shrieks are emasculate; it is quite obvious you have no relationship whatsoever with any female, ever. Your fury with women is characteristic of what Freud called “repressed homosexuality”.

    Some day, you may have something to say that is not the same worn-out, limp-dick hatred of women.

  189. @RWS

    为什么,除了延长不可持续的福利国家的寿命,任何有思想的人都希望增加已经不堪重负的地球的人口?

    为富人创造更多财富。 同样的原因,福利国家首先存在。

    ZPG 不是一个有价值的目标。 一个繁荣的地球在总人口约 4B 时是最佳的。

    • 回复: @RWS
  190. RWS 说:
    @Ali Choudhury

    更多的需求,但没有解决方案:来自第三世界的移民是美国和英国的社会和政府的净消耗,如果不是在其他西方国家也是如此,因为总的来说,他们几乎没有提供援助的技能(更不用说提高) 接收国。

    更有可能的是,西方的福利国家会因自身的重量而崩溃。

  191. RWS 说:
    @manorchurch

    “ZPG 不是一个有价值的目标。 一个繁荣的地球在总人口约 4B 时是最佳的。”

    我们同意(尽管我会要求一个较低的目标,最多可能约为 XNUMX 亿)。

    • 回复: @Factorize
    , @manorchurch
  192. Factorize 说:
    @RWS

    人口减少有一个不可避免的后果:综合人类心理测量潜力减少。 我们现在必须达到或非常接近我们物种所达到的最高水平的心理测量潜力。 为什么许多最伟大的思想家在 20 世纪和 21 世纪做出贡献,这不应该是什么大谜团。 减少 1 亿人意味着我们将放弃一个拥有十亿分之一智力的人和 1,000 个拥有百万分之一智力的人的智力潜力。 完全可以肯定地说,全人类都将因这种损失而变得贫困。 我们可以达到一个没有人可以帮助我们解决我们众多紧迫问题的时代。

    • 回复: @manorchurch
    , @RWS
  193. Rosie 说:
    @TheJester

    Hence, I stand by my claim … “warm and feminine”.

    I now understand what Thomm means when he says “White trashionalism” is identical with feminism.

    The wandering capitalist figures he might as well replace White workers with more pliant, grateful, and submissive brown workers. White nationalists object.

    Jester figures White men might as well replace White women with brown ones, and for precisely the same reason. Feminists object.

    I have been trying to tell alt-Right men that “feminists” are potential allies while MGTOW are a menace. Help sometimes comes from unexpected places.

    Thanks, Jester & Thomm.

  194. @RWS

    我们同意(尽管我会要求一个较低的目标,最多可能约为 XNUMX 亿)。

    Yeah, me too. Most people have no concept of population dynamics within an ecosystem. I reflexively compromise to accommodate those uninformed. I shouldn’t. Feet of clay, I guess.

    • 回复: @RWS
  195. @Travis

    1) Genes aren’t independent of somatic(or gamete, for that matter) cells. Genetic controls for neurons would be in the somatic(in this case, neurons and related infrastructure). Alter that is quite possible.

    2) Assuming, for example, that autism is a prenatal condition, it still would be treatable postnatally. After birth, neurons continue to be rapidly added and the brain size increases around 60-70% in the first 90 days. The brain isn’t a static organ, most dysfunctions have much to do with continuing problems(serotonin processing in schizophrenia patients, for example).

    3) Most theories of IQ development are “spell checking” similar to your concerns of avoiding mental retardation in children. The brain continues to develop postnatally, so it should provide IQ gains, assuming our model is correct.

    4) CRISPR is most useful for specific, one-letter corrections such as Tay-Sachs disease. Even if untreated prenatally, in theory CRISPR would limit damage and its probably that the brain could recover if the HEX-A defect is fixed prior to three/six months of age.

    5) It is theoretically possible to interact with babies prenatally to deliver treatments, though concerns of maternal environment(womb contamination) are always there.

    • 回复: @Travis
  196. @Factorize

    There is an inevitable consequence of a decreased human population: less aggregate human psychometric potential.

    Presumptuous horse manure.

  197. @John Bushcroft

    Maybe it is Economics 102. Suppose you have an interest-earning savings account and an interest-requiring mortgage, and no outside income. The savings account can pay the mortgage account so the credits and debits just cancel. In terms of its government debt, Japan Inc looks like that. Actually their savings account is larger, due to substantial foreign debt holdings.

  198. @Factorize

    Well, in 2017 more than 70% of Americans had a household income below $100,000.

    And even of the households with annual income consistently $100,000 or above, how many have a positive net worth? When we count non-retirement assets, even fewer have a positive net worth.

    How many households in the USA have saved a decent amount for their retirement beyond “Social Security”? Not the majority.

    How many have credit-card debt? The vast majority.

    How many have an emergency fund saved up that would allow them to live without fear, deprivation, or dependency for even six months?

    The American people are nothing close to rich. I’ll stand by my prediction that very few households will be able to afford genetic engineering to increase IQ or otherwise, and I’ll add that most of them won’t be able to borrow the money for it at any reasonable rate either.

  199. Travis 说:
    @Daniel Chieh

    there are hundreds of genes associated with low IQ, autism and schizophrenia. Scientists will never find any specific gene which “causes” these diseases….
    If your identical twin has the illness, you have a roughly 50% chance of developing schizophrenia. If both of your parents have schizophrenia, you have a 36% likelihood of developing the illness…yet scientists still are unable too find the genes which cause it nor have they determined how the genes associated with schizophrenia result in increased risk of schizophrenia or autism, or bipolar disorders etc…

    it is doubtful we will have identified all the genes responsible for mental retardation, and mental illness over the next decade…before CRISPR can be utilized we first must find the genetic causes of these diseases, which we are very far from achieving today. The known genetic effects are not found to have a significant impact on IQ……hundreds of genes involved and most of the studies seem to involve higher IQ whites or Asians…have they found enough high IQ blacks to determine if they have a different set of genes effecting IQ ? What if the genes responsible for higher IQ Caucasians do not raise the IQ in Blacks ?

    • 回复: @Daniel Chieh
  200. @Travis

    Yes, most issues will involve multiple genetic controls, possibly epigenetic effects as well(Down Syndrome is a pretty dramatic example of this). Still, you fix what you can and move from there. IMHO if things such as Tay-Sachs and kernicterus get treated, we’re already making good progress.

    For some, it is indeed a single gene error that causes it. But yes, not the vast majority.

  201. @Maciano

    On the other hand, the heritability of leftism, at least as it expresses itself in today’s current political climate, may change in the future. We may soon (or at least someday) have a supercomputer/AI that can tell us, with certainty, that some individuals and/or races have inferior or superior mental abilities, personality profiles, et al. The current expression of leftism is built on accepting the religion of equality. How will this genotype/personality type react when it’s widely accepted that the core tenant of this faith (biological equality) is proven as false as the flat earth and “Big Book of Jewish Fairy Tales”?

    Also, you never no with children. My parents are still Marxists, I was a leftist up until mid-college, and my inherent inclination skews towards libertarianism (based on my readings of Haidt’s moral modules). However, because of my exposure to HBD I’ve become a right-wing, alt-right sympathizer, despite being Jewish.

  202. Anon[288]• 免责声明 说:

    When the average male is revolted by the natural female body with unshaved pubes, no breast implants, no makeup, and with a few extra pounds, he’s not going to breed children. You have to be attracted to this type of woman to become a father multiple times. There’s no way to do it otherwise. This is the woman you’re going to see across your breakfast table if you marry her, because she’s the majority of all women.

    Of course, if you want a more interesting explanation, a lot of fertile women are on the pill. If a man’s hormones don’t detect a fertile woman, it may be that his libido crashes. It could be the mass use of the pill that’s killing male interest.

  203. Anon[288]• 免责声明 说:

    50 years ago it was 1968. Young women of that time were well-nourished but not fat. They grew their hair as long as they could get it, and long hair is a sexual attractor. The use of the pill was not very common in unmarried women at that time, so the average young women did not give off hormones signally infertility. It was also a positive era and fun-loving era, and young women were happier then than they are today. Many wanted nothing more than traditional marriages, which are nowhere near as stressful as raising kids while working a full-time job like today. Women today are more bad-tempered because they’re overworked and have more responsibilities. Also, back then young women were the majority of the female demographic.

    Of course the men went crazy.

  204. Truth 说:
    @manorchurch

    and am in general of the opinion that most people laying claim to the “conservative” label are simply insufferable, small-minded little fucks who need a good ass-whipping.

    Go get you some, Thommy…

  205. Factorize 说:

    I am feeling the love and abundance of our universe.
    The transcendence of humanity is very near.
    Whether through IQ uplift or AI Singularity, our quest to touch infinity is close.
    It is such a high honor to be present to watch this transformation of our species to something magical.
    I have no doubt that the entire thread is with me on this one.

  206. 5371 说:
    @5371

    Blax,Hispos 的 TFR 仍然比白人高得多,特别是如果你将那些中东人或非白人父亲的腰围排除在后者之外。

    • 回复: @MacNucc11
  207. @Anon

    Certainly the widespread use of hormonal birth control has effected mating choices in America. females on the pill are less likely to marry masculine men than females who avoided taking hormones to fake pregnancy.

  208. cornbeef 说:
    @Alden

    几年前我捐献了精子,简直不敢相信我的东​​西这么快就“卖光了”。

    California Cryobank 是我使用的公司,他们最终往往会坐下来很多神秘的肉 jizz。

    https://cryobank.com/search/?

  209. MacNucc11 说:
    @5371

    但白人也是细分中最大的单一群体。

  210. m___ 说:
    @VICB3

    I’m surprised that nobody has mentioned the effects of crowding and the behavioural sink on suppressed reproduction:

    We touched upon it,

    On the psychological level, digital masturbation, corn-syrup and palm-oil must affect the potential to fertility, as does 人口密度, living conditions. Vaguely, we used to call it quality of life.

    The interaction, the cause consequence relationships are dense, and invisible, but the throttle could well be population issues expressed. Genetic psychometrics will have probably more surprising effects on the non-issue of “collapse”. Attending the real problem, how to get to sustainable human population patterns that include all other factors of a healthy planet is the silent mention here.

    The article is a decoy, it plays the repeated trick of confusing the reader, and detract from the real issue. In the “classic” tradition of an insider joke.

  211. @RWS

    比赛将针对有头脑的熟练第一世界人,而不是发展中国家的黑洛特。

  212. Travis 说:
    @Sin City Milla

    well stated

    100 years ago 50% of Americans had Blue eyes, while today less than 20% of white Americans have Blue eyes, another indication of the vanishing white race..

  213. RWS 说:
    @manorchurch

    “我本能地妥协以适应那些不知情的人。 我不应该。”

    我们有同样的倾向。 然而,一位生态学家叔叔向我灌输了人口过剩导致的许多恐怖事件。 而且,作为一名历史学家,我很早就了解到,在大多数有记录的历史中,地球上的人口总数可能只有五亿左右——但我们创造了伟大的艺术和科学。

    不断增长的人口所做的只是使最终不可能的福利国家维持一段时间。

    • 回复: @Factorize
  214. @5371

    是的,但十年内从 2.8 到 2.1 是一个很大的下降。 墨西哥可能正朝着巴西、波多黎各和新墨西哥的方向发展。 波多黎各和新墨西哥州是拉丁裔占多数的联邦和州,但它们的出生率是美国最低的。 我查了一下美国人口普查的阿纳海姆和圣安娜。 2006 年,这两个城市的 9.7 岁以下人口分别占 10% 和 5%,现在分别下降到 7.2% 和 7.8%。 到 2030 年,如果这种趋势继续下去,阿纳海姆和圣安娜在 5 岁以下儿童中的比例将仅略高于 Mission Viejo。 德克萨斯州和佛罗里达州以外的拉丁美洲人往往生活在加利福尼亚和纽约等生活成本高的州,这会降低您的出生率/

  215. @RWS

    许多拉丁美洲国家现在的出生率很低,例如智利和巴西。 很可能,拉丁美洲最终将跟随东欧,并且由于生活水平不高,因此出生率低于美国。 波多黎各现在低于美国,每 10 名儿童中有 1,000 名儿童,而美国为 13 名儿童。 因此,由于墨西哥人在加州生活成本最高,因此出生率下降的速度将比南部的白人更快。

    • 回复: @RWS
  216. @Oldeguy

    The West is self extinguishing irrespective of any immigrant “hordes”.

    It’s not just the West. East Asian countries like Taiwan and South Korea have even lower fertility rates than the West.

    It’s every country that has been exposed to the cultural poisons spread by the United States.

  217. @ChrisZ

    In any case, as I grow older and more observant I’ve come to appreciate how many people carry a burden of grief in their lives–deep sorrow, disappointment, or a sense of anomie–that they are simply not equipped to deal with. Tattooing has become an approved way of distorting your body, and so perhaps it’s been adopted for this grieving purpose by the present generation. I may be wrong about this; but I can hardly look upon a person with significant tattos in their body without thinking that here is a deeply unhappy person.

    Or a deeply self-pitying self-indulgent person.

  218. Factorize 说:

    When will the politics of demographic collapse reach American consciousness? Mexico will achieve sub-replacement fertility within the next 10 years, as will most of Central and South America. At what point will northward migrating people be welcomed and not excluded?

  219. Watching porn is probably a symptom, rather than a cause of declining sexual activity and family formation. Compared with the 1960s, when many western countries had near full employment, more young adults are living with their parents, more young people are under or unemployed, more young adults are in college doing extended degrees, and a lot more young people are in debt. Hence, the increase in frustrated young males falling back on the cheaper option of staying home and playing videos games or watching porn. It’s interesting that the developed countries with the lowest birth rates (such as Japan and Italy) also tend to be the countries with the highest percentage of young adults who are living with their parents.

  220. @Truth

    Why is there no story about Tommy Robinson getting arrested by the Thought Police? #FreeTommy

    Please post a link to the petition at change.org:

    https://www.change.org/p/theresa-may-mp-free-tommy-robinson

  221. Randal 说:
    @John Bushcroft

    Whites committed a far greater number of crimes in the 60s and 80s than they do today, another function of the number of young white people being higher in those days. The black-white crime disparity is largely a matter of black Americans being younger than white Americans due to a slower (until now) decline in fertility over the 20th century. People forgot about the days when whites were the most criminal.

    I get the impression you simply have no conception of the sheer scale of the hugely increased predilection for violent crime of black men in the US compared to non-black, nor its persistence over time. That’s hardly surprising given the active discouragement of any mention of it in the societies of the modern US sphere, but you can educate yourself by reading the seminal work on this very site:

    美国的种族与犯罪

    Unz includes figures going back to 1985 for the correlations between rates of homicide, robbery and violent crime, and racial populations in US cities, and if you are honest they will shock you. If you are not honest, you will resort to denial in order to keep your opinions within the bounds of what is acceptable received opinion in the aforementioned societies.

  222. Factorize 说:
    @RWS

    RWS 是减少有效人口规模的反发展后果的一个近乎确定的例子,来自塔斯马尼亚。 几个世纪前,当现代欧洲探险家抵达塔斯马尼亚时,他们所经历的真是令人震惊。 当时对塔斯马尼亚社会最准确的描述应该是旧石器时代。 他们是这个星球上任何地方人类学退化最多的人口。 200 年前,无需想象 10,000 年前的生活会是什么样子,您可以直接去塔斯马尼亚亲眼看看。

    几千年来,他们的技术基础已经被侵蚀。 他们失去了制造钓鱼线、回旋镖等的能力。如果他们的社会没有得到拯救,他们似乎几乎不可避免地会继续倒退,也许最终会演变成直立人。

    这怎么可能发生? 12,000 年前,巴斯海峡将塔斯马尼亚和澳大利亚大陆分隔开来。 当塔斯马尼亚与人口基数小得多的大陆隔绝时,重要的技能随着时间的推移而丢失。 在如此小规模的经济中,要成为网匠、回旋镖制造商或几乎任何其他类型的工匠可能会非常困难。 最终,几乎所有的技能都在社区中丢失了。 虽然这似乎是历史的一个怪癖,但将其视为人类历史的重复特征会更准确; 还有很多其他的例子。 没有什么比混凝土知识在 1000 世纪在英国重新出现之前的近 18 年的损失更令人震惊了。

    • 回复: @RWS
  223. @Lucas McCrudy

    ‘…and since we call assume nearly all illegals are non-white…'</I

    I wouldn't be too quick to do that. There's some 'invisible' illegal immigration from Europe, especially Eastern Europe.

  224. RWS 说:
    @cynthia curran

    智利,我很清楚。 由于类似于嵌入美国的社会主义结构,许多最贫穷的人(不幸的是,最不聪明或最没有能力的人)继续以远远超过替代的速度进行再生产。 它诞生在仍在增长的中产阶级中,这些中产阶级正在下降到接近更替水平。

    我对美国混血入侵者的有限观察向我展示了类似的情况:这些最不受欢迎的“公民”(不是南希佩洛西最近声称入侵者实际上是公民吗?当然其他有偿官员今年也这样做了) 将继续生育(但几乎不会抚养)孩子,只要不断缩小的美国中产阶级愿意出钱供养他们。

  225. RWS 说:
    @Factorize

    “[M] 有史以来最伟大的思想家在 20 世纪和 21 世纪都做出了贡献。”

    如果人们阅读清晰而透彻的亚里士多德,除了我们物种的衰败之外,很难相信。 真正伟大的人文艺术思想家和创造者很少出现在上个世纪,或者还没有出现过。 (我知道的太少,无法与任何权威谈论数学和科学,但我想不出单一、独立的思想在数量上的巨大进步能够超越早期的成就。)

    “我们可能会遇到没有人可以帮助我们解决众多紧迫问题的时代。”

    的确! 这些都是我们不断爆炸的人口造成的问题,如果我们不选择以更温和的方式减少人口,这些问题最终必须崩溃。

    人口增长不是解决人口增长的办法。

  226. RWS 说:
    @Factorize

    “[A] 减少有效人口规模的反发展后果的一个近乎确定的例子来自塔斯马尼亚。”

    这种回归与人口规模无关,这可能 增长 在塔斯马尼亚岛与大陆隔离之后。 更确切地说,是针对不同人群保存技能和其他知识的能力。

    “[T]这里还有很多其他的例子。 没有什么比混凝土知识在 1000 世纪在英国重新出现之前的近 18 年的损失更令人震惊了。”

    或电池,或希腊火,或具象艺术。 并且每个人丧失的原因不包括人口减少,而是教育减少和继任人口丧失保持(更不用说增加)知识和技能的能力。

  227. RWS 说:
    @Oldeguy

    “问题 。 . . 是 。 . . 承担父母职责和负担的意愿急剧下降。 同样的事情在有记录的历史上也曾发生过,通常是自我吸收增加、社区士气下降和社会处于末期的标志。
    无论有任何移民‘部落’,西方都会自我熄灭。”

    我们同意。 麻烦在于找到解决方案。 击退入侵的部落是不够的:还必须鼓励最好的人类素质,这可以通过恢复乐观和复原力来广泛实现。 我觉得(并且在某种程度上认为)这可以通过降低税收、监管、人口过剩所固有的压力和社会不和谐来实现; 所有的一切,都是为了扩大个人自由的范围,鼓励和平的个人表达,无论是通过艺术、工业——还是家庭。

当前评论者
说:

发表评论-对超过两周的文章发表评论,将在质量和语气上进行更严格的判断


 记得 我的信息为什么?
 电子邮件回复我的评论
$
提交的评论已被许可给 Unz评论 并可以由后者自行决定在其他地方重新发布
在翻译模式下禁用评论
通过RSS订阅此评论主题 通过RSS订阅所有John Derbyshire的评论