Unz评论•另类媒体选择$
美国主流媒体大都排除了有趣,重要和有争议的观点
 博客浏览荣格弗洛伊德档案
“拉丁裔”或“拉丁裔”是对所谓“拉丁美洲”土著人民真实身份的侮辱——西班牙和葡萄牙帝国主义者带来的多样性破坏了原始人民的土著性,他们通过大量涌入促进了多样性非洲奴隶——多样性被征服并被强奸
通过电子邮件将此页面发送给其他人

 记住我的信息



=>

书签 全部切换总目录添加到图书馆从图书馆中删除 • B
显示评论下一个新评论下一个新回复了解更多
回复同意/不同意/等等 更多... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
同意不同意谢谢LOL轮唱
这些按钮可将您的公开协议,异议,感谢,LOL或巨魔与所选注释一起注册。 仅对最近使用“记住我的信息”复选框保存姓名和电子邮件的频繁评论者可用,并且在任何八个小时的时间内也只能使用三次。
忽略评论者 关注评论者
搜寻文字 区分大小写  确切的词  包括评论
列表 书签

玛雅文明不是拉丁裔。 那么,为什么玛雅背景的人被称为“拉丁裔”(或“拉丁裔”)?

印加文明不是拉丁裔。 那么,为什么印加背景的人被称为“拉丁裔”(或“拉丁裔”)?

'Latinos' 已经出局,'Latinx' 出现在加州大学圣地亚哥分校,以向不断发展的性别和性术语致敬

https://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-latino-latinx-ucsd-20181202-story.html

真正的道德愤怒应该是这样的:为什么要使用“拉丁裔”或“拉丁裔”(或其他拉丁语)来指称这么多墨西哥、中美洲和南美洲的人,他们不具有拉丁身份、历史或遗产?

拉丁语-无论是墨西哥-中美洲-南美洲的强加身份,除非一个人恰好是欧洲征服者或移民入侵者血统(或有大量白血)。 事实上,这些地区的原住民的存在可以追溯到 10,000 多年前。 他们中的一些人的历史和独特的文化可以追溯到 1,000 年前。 因此,在以帝国主义者和征服者的身份出现的欧洲人到来之前,他们就有了身份。 在拉丁美洲的统治下,他们不是墨西哥-中美洲-南美洲的共同主人,而是欧洲征服者的臣民和奴隶。 因此,将那个地区的所有人民称为“拉丁裔”或“拉丁裔”是非常侮辱人的。

想象一下,如果我们称菲律宾人为“拉丁裔亚洲人”,因为他们被西班牙人统治了几个世纪。 假设由于 250 年的英国统治,我们将亚洲印第安人称为盎格鲁-亚洲人。 假设我们将非洲黑人称为拉丁裔非洲人、高卢非洲人、盎格鲁非洲人、荷兰裔非洲人、比利时非洲人等,因为非洲大部分地区曾一度被各种欧洲殖民者统治。 将土着中观“美国人”称为“西班牙裔”或“拉丁裔”(或完全荒谬和颓废的“拉丁裔”,听起来像拉丁-Dominatrix)是完全错误的。

至少在美国,我们不会将黑人和美洲印第安人称为“盎格鲁人”。 即使他们在盎格鲁统治下并学会说英语,他们仍然被称为“非洲人”或“印度人”或“美洲原住民”。 他们的大部分真实身份都受到尊重。 它们没有标有 Anglo 或 Anglx 的通用术语。 但是由于某种原因,墨西哥-中美洲-南美洲的每个人(无论种族或文化出身)都被称为“拉丁裔”,现在被称为“拉丁裔”,即使他或她(或“他们”?)没有白血统或少量白血。 土著人的深层身份被忽视,他们只是被贴上了征服他们的欧洲帝国主义的身份。 就好像在欧洲人到来之前,他们没有历史、身份和文化。 来自世界那个地区的黑人也被称为“拉丁裔”,现在被称为“拉丁裔”,尽管他们实际上是非洲裔,并被拉丁-欧洲和拉丁-犹太奴隶贩子奴役和强行带走。

使用这种逻辑,我认为生活在犹太人统治下的巴勒斯坦人应该被称为犹太阿拉伯人。 (犹太人统治下的奴隶制尤其悲惨。如果欧洲基督教奴隶主和穆斯林奴隶主至少愿意与奴隶人口分享上帝和耶稣/穆罕默德,那么犹太人不会与他们的奴隶分享盟约。通过皈依基督教或伊斯兰教,至少在精神方面,奴隶与主人平等。但犹太盟约只适用于犹太人,犹太主人从不将非裔奴隶视为他们的精神平等。)

另一件事。 这种性别扭曲的意识形态只是西方文化帝国主义的最新成果(现在在犹太资本主义的全球同性恋疯子下变得颓废和堕落)。 事实上,性别意识形态、同性恋狂热和 LGBTQ 主义本质上是犹太全球主义的代表形式。 它是基督教的犹太帝国主义等价物。 由于犹太人讨厌基督教,不再相信马克思主义之类的东西,他们需要一个新的“精神”和传教士意识形态议程来团结世界各地的所有精英。 他们的“精神”武器是Globo-Homomania。 为什么? 因为性别歧视主义对统治精英没有经济挑战。 毕竟,同性恋和变性人天生就是自负和自恋的,并且会吸引有钱有势的人。 此外,由于世界各地的同性恋者和变性人都受到全球主义精英力量的青睐、崇拜和提升,他们成为全球同性恋世界统治的最忠诚的仆人。 “同性恋权利”变成了同性恋仪式,即鸡奸“彩虹”的同性恋射线对同性恋者和变性人的奉献。
此外,由于每个国家都有其不满的同性恋者,这些同性恋者成为最愿意与全球主义犹太势力合作的理想的第五专栏作家。 犹太人和同性恋在支持少数精英统治而非非犹太人和异性恋方面意见一致。

大多数中国人爱国,与中国站在一起,大多数伊朗人爱国,与伊朗站在一起。 但中国和伊朗的同性恋者和异性恋者可能会感到不满,因为他们没有得到同性恋者(以及越来越多的异性恋者)在犹太人控制的西方所受到的崇拜和奉承。 因此,他们最有可能与犹太全球主义者合作颠覆他们自己的国家。 毕竟,如果犹太人的全球同性恋意识形态接管了中国和伊朗,那里的同性恋将被提升为圣人、天使甚至神灵。

因此,这种“拉丁”业务是对所谓“拉丁美洲”土著人民的双重攻击。 他们真正的本土身份是(1)埋葬在欧洲征服者的帝国主义身份之下,(2)被犹太全球人世界秩序的颓废和堕落的消费资本主义崇拜所覆盖。 这是完全的BS。

为“拉丁美洲”的所有土著人民争取更真实的认同感的真正运动应该要求完全拒绝“拉丁”一词。 “拉丁裔”或“拉丁语-whatever”应仅适用于“拉丁美洲”中的白人或西班牙或葡萄牙血统(也可能是意大利血统)的白人。 棕色人种或大部分土著人应该恢复和恢复他们自己的土著身份,并坚持认为他们被称为这样的人,而不是被贴上征服他们、“种族灭绝”、奴役和“强奸”他们的帝国主义身份的标签' 他们(创造混血儿混血儿)。

所谓的“拉丁美洲”是世界上最悲惨的部分。 至少在北美和澳大利亚(以及西伯利亚),当地人口足够小,很容易被征服和安抚。 相比之下,现在被称为“拉丁美洲”的地区估计有 60 万人(拥有相当先进和复杂的文明)。 其中约有 55 万人被杀,主要是因为疾病,但也有枪支和贪婪。 至少,亚洲人、中东人和非洲人对欧洲人带来的疾病免疫。 (如果有的话,一种始于亚洲的疾病在黑死病中消灭了 1/3 的欧洲人。)因此,非洲人、亚洲人和中东人都及时从欧洲人手中夺回了领土和独立。 但是墨西哥-中美洲-南美洲的土著人民和文化一直受到欧洲帝国主义精英的统治。 这种接管不仅是政治或经济的,甚至在文化认同领域也是如此。 通过将墨西哥-中-美洲-南美洲的土著棕色人称为“拉丁裔”、“拉丁裔”或“拉丁-随便什么”,他们不仅被剥夺了政治独立(来自欧洲征服者),而且还被剥夺了自己的文化和种族认同。

然而可悲的是,布朗人一定是非常愚蠢的,因为他们没有看到大局,而是认为他们赢得了一场伟大的文化战争,因为他们被犹太帝国主义所吸引,接受了全球人的“拉丁人”白痴作为他们的真实身份。 难怪他们如此容易和永久地被西班牙人和征服者征服。 他们是 estupidx。

最后,不言而喻,大多数(欧洲背景的)拉丁美洲人更喜欢模糊和混淆的“拉丁裔”(或“Latinx”)术语,它混淆了白人、棕色和黑人(以及所有混血儿)的身份。混血儿和混血儿)。 这样,白人拉丁裔(征服者背景)可以装扮成“有色人种”,假装是“外国佬帝国主义的受害者”并要求“平权行动”。 通过伪装成有色人种,他们可以假装与棕色人(他们征服和强奸的人)和黑人(他们奴役和剥削的人)有很多共同点。 没有什么比看到所有那些拉丁美洲白人(他们仍然在政治和经济上主导着大部分“拉丁美洲”)假装“种族在‘拉丁美洲’并不重要,因为每个人都是混血儿”更令人恶心的,事实上,墨西哥-中-美洲-南美洲有很多颜色障碍和等级制度。 “拉丁裔”这个松散的术语允许具有征服者或移民-帝国主义背景的拉丁美洲白人洗掉他们所有的入侵、种族灭绝和奴役行为。 毕竟,如果一个拉丁美洲白人和一个土著棕色人都同样是“拉丁裔”(或“拉丁裔”),那么这意味着他们是同一个人或可以互换的。 罗特夫。

大多数通过在精英机构中通过平权行动获得偏袒的拉丁美洲人是白人或主要是白人。 他们的祖先率先征服了美洲,并对当地人进行了第一次“种族灭绝”和大规模强奸。 但现在,他们假装是“有色人种”,是 Yanqui Imperialismo 的可怜受害者,并利用旨在帮助美国黑人和美洲印第安人的平权行动计划。 这么厚颜无耻的人,连一点荣誉都没有。 看看吉尔莫德尔托罗和马可卢比奥。 他们是白人,但他们假装是有色人种的代言人。 他们呼吁将大规模迁移作为一项人权,而事实上,正是欧洲征服者大规模迁移到新世界引发了人类历史上最严重的大规模死亡和剥削。 大规模移民的故事是关于人的力量,而不是人权。 更强大的人迁移到其他土地并接管他们。 只要问问巴勒斯坦人,犹太人的大规模迁移对世界的那一部分做了什么。
如果像吉尔莫·德尔·托罗(Guillermo Del Toro)和马可·卢比奥(Marco Rubio)这样的人真的相信大规模移民是一件好事,那么墨西哥-中-美洲-南美洲的所有拉丁裔白人移民回欧洲并将土地交还给原住民怎么样?被帝国主义摧毁了? 通过消除多样性来恢复本土化。

欧洲征服者背景的吉列尔莫德尔托罗是拉丁裔。

这位土著棕色妇女是“拉丁裔”。 罗特夫。

征服者背景的古巴人马尔科卢比奥是拉丁裔。

Evo Morales of Indigenous Blood 也是“拉丁裔”。 罗特夫。

 
隐藏55条评论发表评论
    []
  1. It varies A LOT by country, of course – but 最先进的 inhabitants of today’s Latin America are mixed to 一些 degree. (Thanks Spanish and Portuguese ‘conquistadores’!)

    Surely: People like Marco Rubio are 其实 White, despite [Marco Rubio] being around 9% non-White. Bolsonaro, by the way, is probably 100% White – his ancestors are 不能 ‘conquistadores’, but RECENT German and Italian immigrants.

    Speaking of Brazil: I’d think between 15% to 30% of Brazil’s population is White, depending on how ‘Nordicist’ your definition of ‘White’ is. (Meanwhile, around 40% to 45% of Brazilians self-classify as ‘White’.) I’m sure, in Brazil, people who self-classify as ‘Black alone’ are waaay more mixed than Brazilians who self-classify as ‘White alone’ – I honestly think it’ll be hard to find a full-blooded African in Brazil; regarding the autochthonous peoples of Brazil, there are NOT many left… but, surely, the remaining ones who live in the forests are unmixed. (P.S.: Brazil has also a sizable East Asian minority; and an even more sizable population of peoples from the Levant.)

  2. KDE1711 说:

    Great article. Jung-Freud has a knack for original and incisive thinking conveyed in simple, direct language.
    My mestizo race was created through sexual domination. The Spaniards came with their guns, beards, and advantage in height, making incels out of an untold number of the Indians who didn’t succumb to disease. Individual Spaniards would take harems of Indian women. Spanish women coming over and marrying Indian men? It didn’t happen.
    The conquest was overall a positive thing, because it brought the natives the Catholic faith. But the heroic priests who attended to the Indians’ souls could rarely protect them from the predations of the secular colonists.
    Race-mixing is a form of violence. On the individual level, it’s not inherently immoral or unnatural. But whenever it’s allowed to become a common practice, it always manifests as the men of one tribe humiliating the men of another tribe. I’m married to a mestiza, and will expect our children to follow our example.
    The author’s sensitivity to the injustice visited on the indigenous peoples of the Americas is laudable. Indeed, sympathy for the Indian is a rare area of close alignment between my views and the left. No enemy of the globalist elite should be indifferent to their ongoing ordeal. The sterilization of Peruvian women in the 1990’s, for example, presaged the globalists’ long-term plans for the rest of us.

    *Note to admin: I made a similar post under a different handle a few weeks ago, but I’m not a spammer. I restarted the network settings on my phone and lost the auto-fill for the fictitious email from my original handle. I’ll stick to this one henceforth. Thanks.

  3. Franz 说:

    All us palefaces are… what? Caux?

    No more of this “white” stuff. We’re caux and we’re proud.

  4. Let’s say “Filipino”, “Filipinx” is out, a tribute to the beast who so bloodily suppressed the Reformation in the Netherlands.

    • 回复: @JustBrooklyn Here
  5. Notsofast 说:

    if anything good can come out of the planned demolition of the west, it might be central and south america regaining sovereignty. the monroe doctrine is a joke and you can be sure that china and russia will move in quickly after the u.s. response to taiwan and ukraine.

    they are already talking about expanding the brics block into a new g8. the record oil prices are going to fuel the venezuelan, mexican, and brazilian economies. i have been impressed with obrador, especially by his actions during during the bolivan coup, granting morales sanctuary that saved his life.

  6. The inventors of Latinx probably don’t even have a clue about the actual genetic make up of many, and in some countries, most of the people who reside in the Spanish speaking Americas. Gender focus is the flavor of the day, and inventing the silly little term Latinx is the “fix” they provided.

  7. Totally agree with your premise, but to what continent do white ppl go when the Great Cleansing begins? Type “indigenous people of Europe” into Google and see what you get, or “European people history.” We are supposedly native to no place on Earth. Maybe we get Antarctica!

    • 回复: @Anon
  8. An interesting article. The chutzpah of these people to impose an identity upon people like Latin Americans, without their permission or approval is astounding. Most Latin Americans reject the term “latinx” as demeaning and counterproductive.

  9. Emilia 说:

    It’s very interesting to compare the history of Latin America with that of the Philippines. Even though both places (other than Brazil in the Americas) fell under Spanish control, the influence of Spain in Latin America is much greater, both genetically and culturally. There was race-mixing in the Philippines, but because relatively few Spaniards went there, the number of Filipino mestizos was small. Latin America took on a “father knows best” mentality, with the majority of mixed Latin Americans taking on the customs of their European fathers – most notably the Spanish language – while in the Philippines, “father” was usually a Filipino man.

    With regard to Native American men becoming “incels,” the same thing happened to a smaller degree among the Bounty mutineers: the Tahitian women all chose to go with the European men on the Bounty, and those who had Polynesian husbands left them or, at least, failed to produce any children with them once they were on Pitcairn Island (one of the women apparently had an older daughter by a Polynesian man when the Bounty men came to Tahiti). Some say any pregnancies they had with Polynesian men were aborted (Polynesians apparently had techniques to terminate pregnancies).

    Another example of men from the “subordinate” group being excluded from the gene pool occurred on the Cape Verde islands, a former Portuguese colony off Africa. The population apparently stems from a mixture of African slaves and European settlers. Since European Y chromosomes constitute a significant part of the gene pool (and European mitochondrial lineages from females almost nothing), that implies that a considerable number of African males were probably left mateless.

    • 回复: @KDE1711
  10. KDE1711 说:
    @Emilia

    迷人的东西。
    I’ve wondered why the Spaniards didn’t significantly mix with the Filipinos. The Castilian tongue was well-established among the elite before the WASP “liberators” repressed it, however. It’s remarkable that Catholicism has held on firmly in the Philippines despite 120 years of WASP/Masonic occupation. In Central America and Brazil, the faith has taken a beating from Evangelicalism (aka Jew-and-money-worship).
    Regarding Brazil, Lusification didn’t really take off until the eighteenth century. For the first couple centuries of colonization, the lingua franca remained Tupi.
    In my first comment, I probably exaggerated the degree of miscegenation in Mexico and elsewhere. The thriving survival of indigenous populations today belies the notion of total racial transformation. It’s likely that mestizos only gradually came to outnumber natives, through breeding with them. As white blood became more widely diffused, its average concentration among mestizos likely diminished, although continued European immigration reinforced the white presence.
    Note that racial-sexual hierarchy isn’t necessarily based on supposed objective standards of aesthetics or sexual prowess, but on arbitrary cultural values. Cantonese women, for example, looked down upon Portuguese men. Neither they nor the women of Cabo Verde – who did mate with the Portuguese – seem to have been swayed by relative priapic talent. Contrary to what porn would have you believe, women generally do not find blacks desirable. Mating with a black affords idiotic young women (usually but not always white) a heightened status in liberal society. I was at the mall the other day and saw three such couples. This country sold its soul to Mammon and Zion, and is paying the price.

    • 回复: @Emilia
    , @Carlos Andres
    , @Stealth
  11. Dimitrie 说:

    The peoples of Central & South America are the result of mixing between Spaniards and indigenes. Spaniards are latin as culture, language (and in a great degree blood) so why is a problem to call latin their off spring? Is this an attempt of political correctness?

    Let’s do not be so impressed about the so called “great civilization” of pre-Columbian. They were rotten to the core, their inner matrix was irremediable dead (and that before the arrival of europeans). Otherwise no way to fall so completely. Let’s do not idolize the aztec-inca-maya noble savage and their failure!

    And more important let’s take their history as a remember to us of what can happen if we forget our way in front of God.

    • 回复: @KDE1711
    , @Vergissmeinnicht
  12. Emilia 说:
    @KDE1711

    Hi, KDE1711. I think that race mixing was less prevalent in the Philippines because few Spaniards (and other Europeans) went there. With regard to the Spanish language in the Philippines, if the Americans had not come, Spanish would have probably become the “lingua franca” of the elite (as English is in India, for example), but without a huge influx of Spaniards and a resulting mestizo population, Spanish would not have become the mother tongue of most Filipinos.

    • 谢谢: KDE1711
  13. KDE1711 说:
    @Dimitrie

    “And more important let’s take their history as a remember to us of what can happen if we forget our way in front of God.“

    Amen. I don’t think the Americans, who’ve sacrificed millions of fetuses to their matriarchal sex cult, are any less bloody than the Mexica (Aztec was the coinage of a German ethnographer). We just keep the slaughter out of public view.

    • 回复: @Dimitrie
  14. Emilia 说:

    Regarding the Philippines, one Spanish book referred to the Philippines as part of “Hispanoasia” (I suppose the rest of “Hispanoasia” might include the island of Guam, for instance?), which in itself is not “wrong.” For example, the Indonesian islands are sometimes called the “Dutch East Indies,” even though the Netherlands had much less impact on Indonesia than Spain had on the Philippines. However, the Spanish book also made some questionable claims, such as that Spanish men fathered millions of mestizos in the Philippines (there do not seem to have been enough Spaniards in the Philippines to spawn a large-scaled mestizo population).

    About Indians being “Anglo-Asians,” there is a population called the Anglo-Indians, descendants of British (or other European) men and Asian Indian women. A famous Anglo-Indian is the singer Engelbert Humperdinck (aka Arnold George Dorsey). However, the Anglo-Indians were a miniscule portion of the Indian population, so unlike mestizos (and mulattoes) in Latin America, they never managed to transform India’s character.

    • 回复: @Jim Bob Lassiter
  15. Emilia 说:

    Sorry, I mean to say “large-scale” population.

  16. Emilia 说:

    Also, about the Filipinos and the Spanish language, I find (at least judging from the Filipino community here in Canada where I live), the older Filipinos speak Spanish well enough (perhaps because Spanish was at one time a mandatory subject in schools in the Philippines), but the younger ones do not generally know it at all.

    • 回复: @JustBrooklyn Here
  17. Trinity 说:

    I call all Beaners by their correct name, “Hispanic.”

    What I can’t stand is when people call mixed race Hispanic people, “Spanish.”

    Cue: Never Been To Spain by Three Dog Night

  18. Trinity 说:

    Native Americans aka Injuns usually have no love for Mexicans. Matter of fact Puerto Ricans usually have no love for Mexicans and vice versa. I’ll take a Mexican over a Puerto Rican most of the time. Mexicans are the rednecks of Hispanics while the Ricans are like the negroids of the Hispanic people.

  19. They’re all Beaners if they’re in this country.

    Include the street-shitters in that, for fun.

    But it’s handier to call any and all, “Mexicans”.

    • 同意: Trinity
  20. JF you finally got the size of the article right, but now you’ve got the title too long. Keep trying, though.

  21. SafeNow 说:

    My ancestors lived in Nottingham. The demonym is “Nottinghamian.” Thus, when people ask about my genealogy, I have a cool-sounding demonym (Plus there’s the cool Robin Hood aspect.). But the history is that, originally, way back, Nottingham was called “Snotta.” So, if it weren’t for the change, when people ask, SafeNow, what’s your ancestry, I would be answering with Snotta + the demonym suffix. So the moral of the story is that sometimes the demonym change is a good thing. Just imagine going through elementary school and middle school with the old version.

  22. Latin America was coined by the French a century ago. It was then called Hispanic America. They wanted to have their share.

    The identity of most of the indigenous people was indeed destroyed, including human sacrifices at a scale never seen. The population boomed after the initial impact. The treatment of the natives was much different by the Anglo-Saxons.

  23. @KDE1711

    > I’ve wondered why the Spaniards didn’t significantly mix with the Filipinos.

    Because only a very few Spanish could be sent there. Only soldiers and priests. The Philippines were ruled via the Nueva España, Mexico.

    • 谢谢: KDE1711
  24. Substitute the word “Catholic” for “Latin”. Should clarify things a bit.

    最好的问候,
    Mike

  25. @Dimitrie

    The peoples of Central & South America are the result of mixing between Spaniards and indigenes.

    To a degree, but depends on the country – and within-country, depends on the region.
    未混合 so-called ‘natives’ in Latin America, and unmixed White people as well; also, in countries like Colombia and Ecuador there are tons of Blacks and Mulattoes.
    .
    .
    .

    I think it’s stupid that people like Marco Rubio/Ted Cruz having the ‘Latino advantage’ regarding quotas and Affirmative Action – 仿佛 they are REAL ‘people of colour’! No! They are White people with a Castilian surname!
    Even more stupid is calling Adam Laxalt (who might become a Senator this year) ‘Hispanic’ – ‘Laxalt’ is a Basque surname! Basques (like Catalans) are NOT Spanish, in fact, they are being 压迫 by Spaniards, they want independence from the Spanish Crown!

    • 回复: @Dimitrie
  26. @Emilia

    It wouldn’t take many White men of any kind to father a lot of kids in the Philippines in pre-birth control days.

    • 回复: @Emilia
  27. Slide 说:

    – appreciate article and photos, one on inca nice, also shows how far people went to have defense, against the destroyer ilk. Couple other notes, pyramd first phot, didn’t originaly have squared ledges, top along supposed ledges is pasted over to appear flat strip, lower facings grinded to change look of where original blocks are, and top pyrmd cut off, shack there instead, and ramps with steps tacked on sides. used to be whole smooth pyrmd, same as mid east. cut down by destroyer ilk, same as now.

  28. @Ann Nonny Mouse

    Can I start referring to people who get inebriated too often as DRUNX?

  29. @Emilia

    Tagalog has a lot of Spanish words.

    • 回复: @Emilia
  30. 1) As Sir Canning wrote above, your title is entirely too long. This one would be better as an abstract, but then this is nothing approaching a scholarly paper.

    2) Writing “People of Color” makes you sound like some woke bastard. I hadn’t thought you were, judging from some of your other titles.

    3) I’m perfectly fine with the Conquistadors having beaten all hell out of, and conquered the Central and South American native savages. As brutal as the Spanish and Portuguese were in doing this, they had NOTHING over the violence of the natives (see MS-13).

    CSZ 峰值愚蠢 blog, being more anti-cannibalism than than the author here is, has more about the subject of the alleged “noble savage” in “Cannibalism is microAggression writ LargeA visual fisking of 杀手科尔特斯.

    It’s just the movies, of course, but the reader may want to get a better, errr, taste, of this by watching 绿色地狱*和 启示录.

    .

    * 部分2 of that review.

  31. Mac_ 说:

    Well on claiming to be latinos, it seems now people are what they say they are, remember, that warren person claiming to be indian, Lying Talker would be the indian name there.

    And you know, since those in goverment and lawyers doing these things use false identities and push doing that, and I think the supreme court posers claimed trans gender people are whatever they say they are -though there is no such thing (can’t change our chromosomes), can’t remember the case some teen front doing an act about using a bathroom or something, anyway, also since we know elections are fakes, if people can say they’re whatever race, or gender, or president, or governor, we should just get together groups of us and declare ourselves president and governors and whatever else ..There’s really nothing standing in the way, except maybe some drones etc but we could figure it out.

    So who wants to be governor of what state, or head of which county, and who wants to be judges wherever ..

  32. Dumbo 说:

    “Latino” just means Latin American, meaning someone born in any of the countries in this region colonized by European nations with Latin-origin languages. It is not a racial nor religious nor even a linguistic category (as you have people who speak Spanish, Portuguese, French and indigenous languages).

    “Hispanic” just seems to mean anyone who speaks Spanish as a mother tongue. Which includes Spaniards but not Brazilians.

    “Latinx” doesn’t mean anything and doesn’t even make sense in Spanish grammar.

    So, we should not talk about “Latinos” as a race or ethnicity, but simply of whites, natives, mestizos, mulattoes, mamelukes, zambos, blacks etc. as they used to do during colonization.

  33. @Dumbo

    Americans who can trace their heritage back to Québec should say they are ‘Latinos’ to the Census – Québec is ‘Latin American’, after all! Hence, be eligible for Gov’t benefits and quotas.

  34. Trinity 说:

    Just call every Beaner, “Chico” or Jose.

    • 回复: @Priss Factor
  35. Cris M. 说:

    Interesting article, on the latin -x thing, beside being false grouping, in putting x across everything, the cons made many of the letters and words, and put labels on everyone to use people. Notice ‘x, first used to mean none, or dead, then later they used as multiply, math, then they made the word se’x’ and used it, then triple ‘x on their smut, and use it in words, such as example, then slap it on more labels such as here. They put it everywhere to mess with our brain.

    Every time we see x it’s mind twisting. Should spell it secs instead. No reason not to, only ones who would argue are the filth cons. Need to make own labels, stop letting them label everything and us. The comment further up at 28. said can they start referring to people who get inebriated as ‘drunx’, -ha. and why spell it drunks instead of x, should question, compare.

    Agree should consider separate original browns from the schemer browns and whites. Should add at this point obviously people should be thinking in natural law, predatory ourselves, predatory offense in defense, for right purpose is morally right, and different than the schemers doing poison and destruction.

  36. Anon[250]• 免责声明 说:
    @Red Pill Angel

    The Birth of the Peoples Republic of Antarctica.

    1983 by John Calvin Bachelor

    Its a book from the 80s, concerns mass immigration from the third world into Europe and the displacement and extermination of the Europeans, the survivors flee by ship to Antarctica.

    Stark by Ben Elton is another book worth reading.

    Atlantis Rising by Clive Cussler also.

    • 谢谢: Red Pill Angel
  37. Emilia 说:
    @Jim Bob Lassiter

    I guess by “millions” I think of, say, at least 30 million, 40 million or more. Given that European DNA in the Philippine population is not particularly large, “millions” seems a bit high.

  38. Emilia 说:
    @JustBrooklyn Here

    It does. For example, the other day I was passing by a Filipino woman talking on her cell phone in Tagalog or some other Filipino language and heard her saying “Trabajo” (“work”) in Spanish.

  39. Emilia 说:
    @Carlos Andres

    From the (relatively few) studies on admixture in the Philippines I’ve seen, it seems that mixing between Spaniards and Filipinas (I’m using the feminine here because almost all such pairing involved Spanish men and Filipino women) were more common in less remote regions (i.e. cities and lowland areas).

  40. AceDeuce 说:

    I just call’em all “Spix”, and have done with it…

  41. In truth, the native peoples of those regions had an existence going back 10,000s of yrs. And some of them had histories and unique cultures going back 1,000s of yrs. So, they had an identity BEFORE the arrival of the Europeans who came as imperialists and conquerors.

    Indeed. Since people of the Right (POR, People of the Right) like to quote Spengler rather than read him, it should be noted that Spengler included the Mesoamerican (Inca/Mayan) among his eight “high cultures,” right along with Classical and Gothic Europe.

    This is an important point because while Mesoamerica had actual nations and civilizations, North American “Indians” were nothing but small bands of hunter/gatherers. The Pilgrims did not “invade” or “defeat” some nation, nor were they “immigrants” (which implies going from one nation to another) but simply moved into mostly empty space., while fending off attacks from the barbarian tribes.

    This needs to be understood, so as to resist the half-truths and lies that make up the Woke narrative (e.g., “we are all immigrants,” or “the Pilgrims invaded America” etc.)

  42. Stealth 说:
    @KDE1711

    I have noticed a sharp reduction in, shall we say, mall couples this summer (the stereotype that AAs stay inside during the winter months appears to be largely true). Not that I never see them anymore, but I don’t spot these couples every time I turn my head, which was almost literally true during 2020 and 2021. I think that trend was given a short term boost by the mass hysteria resulting from George Floyd’s death. There are certainly attractive people of both sexes in every race, but the black guys young white women are choosing to date these days are not good looking at all. Like you, I think there’s no chance they’re actually attracted to them.

    • 同意: KDE1711
    • 回复: @KDE1711
  43. @Carlos Andres

    Bingo. This is also noticeable in Filipino cuisine, heavily influenced by that of … Mexico, not Spain. The famous ‘Manila galleons’ came from Nueva España and returned there. The only Filipino language which has a fair number of Spanish cognates is Viscayan – more than Tagalog (the language taught in schools now). The Spanish first landed on Cebu as I recall, which is one of the middle islands where Viscayan is the native tongue.

    On the subject of admixture in the Philippines, the Chinese first landed there circa. 800 so there are probably some Chinese (probably Cantonese) genes floating around in certain places there. Of course with American and Japanese (however brief) rule in the 20th century, a genetic map of Philippines would be quite an interesting one.

    • 回复: @Emilia
  44. Joe Paluka 说:

    Any person of reasonable intelligence who is aware of the history of those people called “Hispanic” or “Latin” in the United States can see for themselves that these terms can only be properly used in referring to those that use of Spanish language. It can be plainly seen that these people cover the racial spectrum from pure black, mulatto (black white mix), zambo (black indian mix), mestizo (indian white mix) pure indians, and pure whites. These terms were created by communists that wanted to create another group to sew further racial divisions and strife in the US. The US government census department calls pure white people from Central and South America Hispanic, but calls brown-skinned Arabs and Iranians white. What gives?

  45. KDE1711 说:
    @Stealth

    I own a kindle, and half the time I open it up I see ads for trashy women’s romance novels. What race is the man on the cover? Always white. Even the woke af Amazon won’t let the faith trump profit when it truly counts.

  46. Dimitrie 说:
    @KDE1711

    It is true what you said. America and a whole lot of european countries we are in the same bucket with this. I use wrong “if we forget”. Correct it is “If we don’t remember urgently soon”.

    • 回复: @TheJester
  47. Emilia 说:
    @Exalted Cyclops

    Here is a recent study on Filipino genetic makeup:

    https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2026132118

    It showed that less than 1% of all individuals in the study presented a low level of “West Eurasian” admixture. It noted that most of these less than 1% were “lowlanders” i.e. as opposed to people in more remote areas. However, another study (see below) found a “modest” amount of European ancestry (around 3.4%) in self-described Filipinos in California. Presumably, the Filipinos in the California sample were from less remote parts of the Philippines, so their ancestors would have had more possibilities of mixing with Europeans.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4574246/

  48. Dimitrie 说:
    @Vergissmeinnicht

    Yeah, Latin-America is a real mosaic. But people abhor fine shades. So it’s simpler (and more or less wrong) to put template: latin Americans – they speak Spanish, most had a Spanish ancestor, catholic, play at the guitar, spaniards are a latin people ergo south americans are latins! Never mind that a roman I very much doubt that he will recognize in Evo Morales (or Marco Rubio for instance :D) a kinsmen.

  49. Andy 说:

    only those who are originally from Lazio (Italy) can be properly called latinos

  50. The gay/tranny mania will only backfire on the people it’s supposed to benefit in places like China, Africa, and Latin America. (In the Islamic world, they’re doomed regardless.) Of course, the globalists don’t actually care about these “brave” sexual minorities they elevate to god-status. Look at how they view their Ukrainian cannon fodder.

  51. Anymike 说:
    @Carlos Andres

    There is a bizarre story about a Spanish soldier from the Philippines named Gil Perez suddenly appearing in colonial era Mexico City in 1593. He was, of course, immediately taken into custody. He told the authorities that he had no idea how he had gotten there and furthermore offered them the information that the Spanish governor in the Philippines had just been murdered by pirates. He was kept in custody, and the church authorities sought to treat him as a demonic entity.

    Within a couple of months, verification of the events he described arrived in Mexico and further investigation verified his identity. He eventually was sent back to the Philippines and resumed his military duties.

    Did it happen? Well, opinion is divided between teleportation and alien abduction. But folklorists call it a legend. The foundation of the tale though is the existence of regular sea communication between the Philippines and New Spain within less than a century after Columbus. It took only that long to establish an entire civilization. An entire English civilization established in North America in only a few decades.

  52. @Dumbo

    “Hispanic” just seems to mean anyone who speaks Spanish as a mother tongue. Which includes Spaniards but not Brazilians.

    I beg to disagree on that. If you go back to ancient Roman Empire maps, you’ll see that the entire Iberian peninsula (i.e. modern day Spain plus Portugal) is referred to as “Hispania”.

  53. TheJester 说:
    @Dimitrie

    The millions of innocent children lost to abortion in the post-WWII United States, as well as Western Europe, would require one, I would think, to reorder the list of the traditional “purveyors of evil” in the world based on the raw numbers killed. The US numbers alone are more than 63.6 million unborn babies killed since 1973 … and this does not include the statistics from chemical abortions nor the abortions performed in New York and California that are not reported to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC).

    In this reordering, the Germans would no longer be anywhere near the top of the list of “purveyors of evil” based on, let’s say, the 27 million Russians plus the 6 million Jews killed in the “holocaust” at their hands in WWII. Likewise, a reordering is in order for Europeans in general when measured against the estimated 55 million indigenous peoples killed by Europeans during the European conquest of the Americas from 1492 through 1600 as well as the estimated 12.8 million Africans enslaved and shipped across the Atlantic over a span of 400 years.

    The result: Neoliberal America takes the award for organizing the largest-scaled massacre in human history.

当前评论者
说:

发表评论 -


 记得 我的信息为什么?
 电子邮件回复我的评论
$
提交的评论已被许可给 Unz评论 并可以由后者自行决定在其他地方重新发布
在翻译模式下禁用评论
通过RSS订阅此评论主题 通过 RSS 订阅所有荣格弗洛伊德的评论