Unz评论•另类媒体选择$
美国主流媒体大都排除了有趣,重要和有争议的观点
 博客浏览詹姆斯·彼得拉斯(James Petras)档案
寡头成功! 只有人民受苦!
通过电子邮件将此页面发送给其他人

 记住我的信息



=>

书签 全部切换总目录添加到图书馆从图书馆中删除 • B
显示评论下一个新评论下一个新回复了解更多
回复同意/不同意/等等 更多... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
同意不同意谢谢LOL轮唱
这些按钮可将您的公开协议,异议,感谢,LOL或巨魔与所选注释一起注册。 仅对最近使用“记住我的信息”复选框保存姓名和电子邮件的频繁评论者可用,并且在任何八个小时的时间内也只能使用三次。
忽略评论者 关注评论者
搜寻文字 区分大小写  确切的词  包括评论
列表 书签

介绍

自 1930 年代“大”世界大萧条以来,美国政治体系正在经历剧烈的政治攻击、分裂和权力争夺,规模之大前所未有。 行政开除、国会调查、弹劾要求、猎巫、以“蔑视国会”为由威胁监禁以及赤裸裸的权力斗争,已经撕碎了美国强大寡头之间政治团结和共识的表面。

在美国历史上第一次,现任的主席每天都会努力努力掌握州权力。 反对派控制的国家(国家公共广播电台)和团体宣传机构都与总统政权作对。 军事精英和商界寡头派系在国内和国际舞台上对峙。 寡头们互相争论和侮辱。 他们伪造指控、阴谋和欺骗。 他们的政治助手目睹了这些重大冲突,他们对所面临的真正利益保持沉默、愚蠢和视而不见。

总统寡头和反对派寡头之间的斗争对其派系和美国人民产生了深远的影响。 寡头派别中的战争和市场导致反对派寻求控制政治操纵手段(媒体和司法行动的威胁)。

激烈的政治竞争和公开的政治辩论与美国现在存在的“民主”无关。

事实上,它是 缺乏真正的民主, 这允许寡头进行严重的精英内部战争。 边缘化、去政治化的选民无法利用冲突来推进自己的利益。

什么是“冲突” 公司简介

寡头之间的“生与死”斗争是 不是为了和平!

参与这场斗争的寡头政治派别没有一个与民主或独立政府结盟。

双方都不想使美国选举进程民主化,也不想拆除怪诞的警察国家机器。

双方都没有对美国工人和雇员的“新政”做出任何承诺。

两者都对解决生活水平不断下降或工人和农村阶级“过早”死亡率空前增加所需的政策变化不感兴趣。

尽管在维护寡头权力和反对更多人口利益的政策方面有这些相似之处,但在总统政权和永久国家机构的内容和方向上存在深刻分歧。

寡头斗争是关于什么的

寡头派系在海外战争和“干预”问题上存在深刻分歧。

“反对派”(民主党和部分共和党精英)继续推行全球战争政策,尤其是针对俄罗斯和中国以及亚洲和中东地区的地区战争。 尽管在国内(经济衰退和贫困加剧)和国际上产生了大规模种族清洗、恐怖主义、战争难民被迫迁移到欧洲以及饥荒和流行病(例如霍乱和饥饿)等灾难性后果,但仍顽固地拒绝修改军事政策。也门)。

特朗普总统似乎赞成加强与伊朗和朝鲜的军事对抗,并干预叙利亚、委内瑞拉和也门。

“反对派”支持多边经济和贸易协定(如 TTP 和 NAFTA),而特朗普则支持利润丰厚的“双边”经济协定。 特朗普依靠与沙特阿拉伯和海湾酋长国的贸易和投资协议以及形成侵略性的军事“轴心”(美国-沙特阿拉伯-以色列-海湾酋长国),最终推翻伊朗的民族主义政权并分裂该国。

“反对派”追求战争和暴力的“政权更迭”,以取代不听话的“暴君”和民族主义者,并建立“附庸政府”,为美国军事帝国提供基地。 特朗普政权支持现有的独裁者,他们可以投资于他的国内基础设施议程。

“反对派”寻求最大限度地发挥华盛顿全球军事力量的作用。 特朗普总统专注于扩大美国在全球市场中的作用。

两个寡头派别虽然都支持美帝国主义,但在性质和手段上有所不同。

对于“反对派”来说,每个国家,无论大小,都可以是一个 军事征服目标. 除了投射美国的军事优势之外,特朗普还倾向于支持利润丰厚的海外市场的扩张。

寡头:战术上的相似之处

寡头之间的竞争并不排除手段和策略的相似性。 两派都赞成增加军费开支、支持沙特对也门的战争以及干预委内瑞拉。 他们支持与中国的贸易以及对俄罗斯和伊朗的国际制裁。 他们都表现出对以色列国的奴隶般的尊重,并赞成在整个政治、经济和情报机构中公开任命犹太复国主义特工。

然而,这些相似之处会受到战术政治宣传小冲突的影响。 “反对派”谴责对俄罗斯政策的任何偏差是“叛国罪”,而特朗普则指责“反对派”通过北美自由贸易协定牺牲了美国工人。

无论战术上的细微差别和相似之处如何,野蛮的寡头之间的斗争都远非戏剧性的演练。 无论真实的和虚假的异同,寡头争夺皇权和国内权力的斗争都对政治和宪法秩序产生了深远的影响。

寡头选举代表制和平行警察国家

特朗普政府与“反对派”之间正在进行的斗争并不是关于立法或决定的典型小规模冲突。 它不是对国家公共财富的过度控制。 冲突围绕着对政权的控制和国家权力的行使展开。

立即订购

反对派拥有强大的力量,包括国家情报机构(国家安全局、国土安全部、联邦调查局、中央情报局等)以及五角大楼和国防工业的重要部门。 此外,反对派为驱逐特朗普总统创造了新的权力中心,包括司法部门。 这在前联邦调查局局长罗伯特·穆勒被任命为“特别调查员 总检察长办公室的主要成员,包括副总检察长罗布·罗森斯坦。 任命穆勒的是罗森斯坦,此前司法部长“杰夫”塞申斯(特朗普的盟友)“被迫”隐居,因为他在履行其作为高级成员的前国会职责的过程中与俄罗斯外交官“会面”。参议院外交关系委员会。 这种“回避”剥夺了特朗普在司法机构中最重要的盟友的重要自由裁量权。

新的 卷筒纸 反对派权力蔓延,包括前警察国家官员,包括超级安全经理迈克尔·切尔托夫(罗伯特·穆勒的同事),他在 GW Bush 领导下领导国土安全部,约翰·布伦南(中央情报局),詹姆斯·科米(联邦调查局)等。

The opposition dominates the principal organs of propaganda -the press (Washington Post, Financial Times, New York Times and Wall Street Journal), television and radio (ABC, NBC, CBS and PBS/ NPR), which breathlessly magnify and prosecute the President and his allies for an ever-expanding web of unsubstantiated ‘crimes and misdemeanors’. Neo-conservative and liberal think tanks and foundations, academic experts and commentators have all joined the ‘hysteria chorus’ and feeding frenzy to oust the President.

The President has an increasingly fragile base of support in his Cabinet, family and closest advisers. He has a minority of supporters in the legislature and possibly in the Supreme Court, despite nominal majorities for the Republican Party.

The President has the 被动 support of his voters, but they have demonstrated little ability to mobilize in the streets. The electorate has been marginalized.

Outside of politics (the ‘Swamp’ as Trump termed Washington, DC) the President’s trade, investment, taxation and deregulation policies are backed by the majority of investors, who have benefited from the rising stock market. However, ‘money’ does not appear to influence the parallel state.

The divergence between Trumps supporters in the investment community and the political power of the opposition state is one of the most extraordinary changes of our century.

Given the President’s domestic 虚弱 and the imminent threat of a coup d’état, he has turned to securing ‘deals’ with overseas allies, including billion-dollar trade and investment agreements.

The multi-billion arms sales to Saudi Arabia and the Gulf Emirates will delight the military-industrial complex and its hundreds of thousands of workers.

Political and diplomatic ‘kowtowing’ to Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu should please some American Zionists.

But the meetings with the EU in Brussels and with the G7 in Siciliy failed to neutralize Trump’s overseas opposition.

NATO’s European members did not accept Trump’s demands that they increase their contribution to the alliance and they condemned his reluctance to offer unconditional US military support for new NATO members. They showed no sympathy for domestic problems.

In brief, the President’s overseas supporters, meetings and agreements will have little impact on the domestic correlation of forces.

Moreover, there are long-standing ties among the various state apparatuses and spy agencies in the EU and the US, which strengthen the reach of the opposition in their attacks on Trump.

While substantive issues the Presidential and Opposition oligarchs, these issues are 垂直,不 , cleavages – a question of ‘their’ wars or ‘ours’.

Trump intensified the ideological war with North Korea and Iran; promised to increase ground troops in Afghanistan and Syria; boosted military and advisory support for the Saudi invasion of Yemen; and increased US backing for violent demonstrations and mob attacks in Venezuela.

The opposition demands more provocations against Russia and its allies; and the continuation of former President Obama’s seven wars.

sets of oligarchs support the ongoing wars, the major difference is over who is managing the wars and who can be held responsible for the consequences.

Both conflicting oligarchs are divided over who controls the state apparatus since their power depends on which side directs the spies and generates the fake news.

Currently, both sets of oligarchs wash each other’s ‘dirty linen’ in public, while covering up for their collective illicit practices at home and abroad.

The Trump oligarchs want to maximize 经济 deals through ‘uncritical’ support for known tyrants; the opposition ‘critically’ supports tyrants in exchange for access to US military bases and military support for ‘interventions’.

President Trump pushes for major tax cuts to benefit his oligarch allies while making massive cuts in social programs for his hapless supporters. The Opposition supports milder tax cuts and lesser reductions in social programs.

总结

The battle of the oligarchs has yet to reach a decisive climax. President Trump is still the President of the United States. The Opposition forges ahead with its investigations and lurid media exposés.

The propaganda war is continuous. One day the opposition media focuses on a deported student immigrant and the next day the President features new jobs for American military industries.

The emerging left-neo-conservative academic partnership (e.g. Noam Chomsky-William Kristol) has denounced President Trump’s regime as a national ‘catastrophe’ from the beginning. Meanwhile, Wall Street investors and libertarians join to denounce the Opposition’s resistance to major tax ‘reforms’.

Oligarchs of all stripes and colors are grabbing for total state power and wealth while the majority of citizens are labeled ‘losers’ by Trump or ‘deplorables’ by Madame Clinton.

The ‘peace’ movement, immigrant rights groups and ‘black lives matter’ activists have become mindless lackeys pulling the opposition oligarchs’ wagon, while rust-belt workers, rural poor and downwardly mobile middle class employees are powerless serfs hitched to President Trump’s cart.

结语

After the blood-letting, when and if President Trump is overthrown, the State Security functionaries in their tidy dark suits will return to their nice offices to preside over their ‘normal’ tasks of spying on the citizens and launching clandestine operations abroad.

The media will blow out some charming tid-bits and ‘words of truth’ from the new occupant of the ‘Oval Office’.

The academic left will churn out some criticism against the newest ‘oligarch-in-chief’ or crow about how their heroic ‘resistance’ averted a national catastrophe.

Trump, the ex-President and his oligarch son-in-law Jared Kushner will sign new real estate deals. The Saudis will receive the hundreds of billions of dollars of US arms to re-supply ISIS or its successors and to rust in the ‘vast and howling’ wilderness of US-Middle East intervention. Israel will demand even more frequent ‘servicing’ from the new US President.

The triumphant editorialists will claim that ‘our’ unique political system, despite the ‘recent turmoil’, has proven that democracy succeeds . . . only the people suffer!

Long live the Oligarchs!

 
隐藏39条评论发表评论
忽略评论者...跟随Endorsed Only
修剪评论?
    []
  1. ” In fact, it is the absence of real democracy, which permits the oligarchs to engage in serious intra-elite warfare. The marginalized, de-politicized electorate are incapable of taking advantage of the conflict to advance their own interests. ”

    Alas not just in the USA, but also in the EU.
    The recent French election was no more than the ruling elite’s concern that Marine le Pen would be elected.
    In the USA the unimaginable was the case, a political outsider was elected.
    The same with Brexit, also unimaginable.

    So now complete confusion with the elites, what with the EU, with NATO, what with globalisation, is Russia really an enemy, can Israel continue its policies since 1948, what with immigration into Europe, and so on, and so forth.

  2. Democracy is a lie. It has never existed and cannot exist in society where tiny minority owes almost everything. It is illusion to keep masses preoccupied while they are being fleeced. Same everywhere now.

    • 同意: jacques sheete
  3. It’s a modern-day version of Shakespeare’s 朱利叶斯·凯撒. Let’s hope Trump stays away from the Senate.

  4. @The Alarmist

    Following on that same note, someone should tell Hillary Rodham Clinton, “The fault, dear Hillary, is not in our stars, but in ourselves.”.

    I guess the modern day version would be, “The fault, dear Hillary, is not in thousands of Facebook postings by a thousand Russian agents, but in your assumption that the Deep State and the MSM would drag you across the finish line to the victory you felt was rightfully yours.”

    • 回复: @RobinG
  5. The triumphant editorialists will claim that ‘our’ unique political system, despite the ‘recent turmoil’, has proven that democracy succeeds . . . only the people suffer!

    Long live the Oligarchs!

    “A reign of witches”, Thomas Jefferson, Secretary of State under George Washington, aimed this jeremiad at Presidents Washington and Adams.

    The script is old, only the characters are new.

    https://robertmagill.wordpress.com/2017/04/18/we-have-always-been-a-right-wing-plutocracy/

  6. @The Alarmist

    The good thing there is no Hillary statue over there to fell under.

  7. Vladimir Brovkin [又名“ Vlad”] 说:

    这是对美国今天状况的一个很好的总结。 特朗普能做什么? 这是一条建议。 他应该选择一个他可以信任的情报机构,可以是 DIA 或创建一个新的机构,甚至可以是非正式的机构来打击毕竟是重罪的泄密。 他应该公开对抗像麦凯恩这样的共和党敌人,是总统制定外交政策而不是参议员,他应该公开对抗俄罗斯门,坚持他有权建立他希望建立的任何渠道,他应该重新开始对克林顿的调查。电子邮件,克林顿基金会,调查谁泄露了 DNC 材料换句话说,将注意力重新集中在克林顿和民主党身上,这是他从第一天起就应该做的事情。 他应该以多种方式激活支持者的社会基础,他应该动员那些支持他并从他的政策中受益的业务部门。 战争就是战争,他应该停止以一种不屑一顾的防御姿态拖延,是时候还击了,重拳出击。

    • 同意: anarchyst, Che Guava
    • 回复: @aandrews
  8. 所有关于民主的咆哮和抱怨都忽略了这样一个事实,即美国宪法过去和现在都是反民主的文件,尽管权利法案中表达了民粹主义情绪,该法案被作为事后的想法加入,以帮助宪法获得批准。

    美国从来没有打算成为一个民主国家,也从来没有。 它从来都不是真正的共和国,也只是名义上的。 它也从来没有真正免费过。 工资和税奴不是免费的。

    它被设计并一直作为 事实上的 决议案。

    然而,很高兴看到越来越多的人似乎正在意识到这些事实,尽管这是一个令人痛苦的缓慢过程

    • 回复: @aandrews
    , @alan2102
  9. animalogic 说:

    This is a very good, thought provoking article.
    Clearly there is conflict between Oligarchs: much of conflict is tactical – as the author points out ALL the Oligarchs support US imperialism & (it’s major tool) the military. However, Trump prefers a more nationalist economic approach, & bi-lateral over multi-lateral trade agreements. He was , to all appearances, more “open” to Russia than most other Elites. To what degree these are genuinely substantive issues between Oligarchs will, I suspect, be long debated.
    What clouds ALL issues is Trump himself. No one can deny that he provokes a visceral, virtually psychotic hatred in many Elites (& not just Dem’s but Republicans also). I also suspect that Trump could follow almost all Elite policies & he would STILL be hounded. In such a climate “issues” become mere sticks with which to HIT. (The D’s would impeach him for sorcery if they could get away with it)
    A couple of negative points in the article:
    Surely this (at this point in time) is exaggeration ?
    “Given the President’s domestic weakness and the imminent threat of a coup d’état…”
    Further, the “epilogue” in which the author argues that were Trump “overthrown” thing would return to normal quite quickly. I do not believe this. Depending on circumstances there are very good odds that not only a political, but social crisis would occur: Trump supporters are not stupid – they KNOW their guy has been treated like Shit from day one.
    More positively: authorise spot ON here:
    “The ‘peace’ movement, immigrant rights groups and ‘black lives matter’ activists have become mindless lackeys pulling the opposition oligarchs’ wagon, while rust-belt workers, rural poor and downwardly mobile middle class employees are powerless serfs hitched to President Trump’s cart.”

  10. Agent76 说:

    20年2015月XNUMX日,国家的周期(作者Daniel Sanchez)

    丹尼尔·桑切斯(Daniel Sanchez)结合了罗伯特·希格斯(Robert Higgs)和汉斯·赫尔曼·霍普(Hans-Hermann Hoppe)的理论,形成了国家循环的理论。

  11. A very fine, evenly balanced analysis of the current bizarro madness that passes for authentic governance.

    • 回复: @Agent76
  12. Agent76 说:

    May 31, 2017 A Groundbreaking Examination of How This Profoundly Altered the Nature of American Democracy

    Garry Wills (born May 22, 1934) is an American author, journalist, and historian, specializing in American history, politics, and religion, especially the history of the Catholic Church. He won a Pulitzer Prize for General Non-Fiction in 1993.

    • 回复: @nickels
  13. Consider one of the most odious oligarchs of all time, Ted Kennedy. What damage he did.

    请参见: http://fosterspeak.blogspot.com/2017/06/edward-teddy-kennedy-how-lecher-became.html

  14. @aandrews

    Resoligrcharum. Definition?

    Republic is from res publica, “a thing of the public.”

    Resoligarcharum is my neologism for res oligarcharum, “a thing of the oligarchs.”

    PS: The antifederalists’ suspicions and predictions regarding the constitution were mostly and significantly correct. They saw the fraud coming and knew how it was likely to play out. Regarding the issue of freedom, with the institution of the Federal Reserve, it’s even worse than they could have imagined,

    • 回复: @Agent76
  15. nickels 说:
    @Agent76

    Very interesting. I put his book on my ‘to read’ stack. This seems like a pretty reasonable narrative on how these institutions gained so much power.

    • 回复: @jacques sheete
  16. Agent76 说:
    @jacques sheete

    This quote nails everything in a nutshell, “Private property was the original source of freedom. It still is its main ballpark.” Walter Lippmann

    • 回复: @jacques sheete
  17. @Agent76

    This quote nails everything in a nutshell, “Private property was the original source of freedom. It still is its main ballpark.” Walter Lippmann

    Lippman was definitely a mixed bag, but he spoke a lot of truths. His attitude regarding intelligence testing, to name one subject, were spot on and remain so. Short summary: It’s pretty much BS.

    Another thanks to RU. One can read a lot of Lippman’s (and other great observers’) stuff on another fabulous UNZ site.:

    Nearly a century ago Walter Lippman warned us of the sappy and dangerous false conclusions many “high IQ” dingbats would draw. He was correct then and still is.
    “One has only to read around in the literature of the subject, but more especially in the work of popularizers like McDougall and Stoddard, to see how easily the Intelligence test can be turned into an engine of cruelty, how easily in the hands of blundering or prejudiced men it could turn into a method of stamping a permanent sense of inferiority upon the soul of a child.
    –沃尔特·利普曼(Walter Lippmann),“滥用测试”,新共和国,15年1922月297日,第XNUMX页。 XNUMX –

    http://www.unz.org/Pub/NewRepublic-1922nov15-00297

    • 回复: @Agent76
  18. @nickels

    While I’m not familiar with that author, I am a huge fan of A.J. Nock.

    This helps explain why I deny that the USA was never truly intended as a republic.:

    The Constitution looked fairly good on paper, but it was not a popular document; people were suspicious of it, and suspicious of the enabling legislation that was being erected upon it. There was some ground for this. The Constitution had been laid down under unacceptable auspices; its history had been that of a coup d’état.

    它最初是由代表特殊经济利益的人起草的。 其中五分之四是公共债权人,三分之一是土地投机者,五分之一代表对运输,制造和销售的兴趣。 他们大多数是律师。 他们中没有一个人代表生产的利益-Vilescit起源的塔利。 (骰子从一开始就被加载)

    阿尔伯特·杰伊·诺克(Albert Jay Nock),《自由与宪法》:早期斗争

    mises.org/每日/ 4254

    • 回复: @nickels
  19. RobinG 说:
    @The Alarmist

    任命一名特别检察官调查涉嫌维基解密电子邮件泄露者Seth Rich的谋杀案。

    On July 10, 2016, Seth Rich was shot twice in the early morning as he walked back to his house in Washington D.C. Immediately after the crime, the death was called an armed robbery… but none of Seth Rich’s belongings were taken from him.

    Rod Wheeler, a private investigator hired by the family, said that there was evidence Seth Rich had contacted WikiLeaks and that law enforcement were covering this up. MSM is not covering this murder, instead pushing it to the side, so it is now up to us.

    The facts do not add up, law enforcement stopped covering the crime, and now it is time for us to fight for justice. Seth Rich deserves this.

    在这里签名:

    https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/appoint-special-prosecutor-investigate-murder-seth-rich-alleged-wikileaks-email-leaker

  20. A rather bleak outlook all-in-all. The oligarch’s don’t win nor do the cruise-control mob. The little guys win now as well as later. Relax and don’t stress for no oligarch will escape unscathed. The BOSS always acts (Psa 73).

  21. Dr. Doom 说:

    Democracy is the gawd that failed. It killed Ancient Athens, Rome and anyone dumb enough to allow the average person to vote himself other peoples’ wages. Trump is about as masterful as any old man who has left reality behind. He might as well be doing Wrestlemania again. The “oligarchs” are the dumbest and greediest crooks Satan could dredge from the Global Sewers. Its not a swamp, its a sewer. Raw sewage is beginning to stink to high heaven. Its not a struggle between these greedy idiots, its a fractured fairy tale in a hate filled delusional book of mindless drivel being pushed by the stupidest and most arrogant gaggle of morons ever to make their nightmares the problem of people who if they wanted to could slaughter them like pork bellies by the end of business tomorrow.
    This siren song of globalism is a bunch of crazy fags and delusional arrogant whores with delusions of grandeur and the IQ of a head of cabbage trying to get people to work for nothing and thank them for stealing their future. How does it end? Read the Book of Revelation. The Founding Fathers fought the forebears of these idiots at The Bank of England. They run America into the ground at the legalised counterfeiting ring laughably called The Federal Reserve Today. What if this money was real? What if these Satanists were actually smart? What if voting and caring actually mattered?
    Well, then I wouldn’t be here to kill you… Enjoy what you laughingly call a life. Its the End of the World as you know it, but I feel fine.

  22. ” it must be considered that there is nothing more difficult to carry out, nor more doubtful of success, nor more dangerous to handle, than to initiate a new order of things. For the reformer has enemies in all those who profit by the old order, and only lukewarm defenders in all those who profit from the new order, this lukewarmness arising partly from fear of their adversaries, who have the laws in their favor; and partly from the incredulity of mankind, who do not believe in anything new until they have had actual experience of it. Thus it arises that on every opportunity for attacking the reformer, his opponents do so with the zeal of partisans, the others defend him halfheartedly, so that between them he runs great danger. It is necessary, however, in order to investigate thoroughly this question, to examine whether these innovators are independent, or wether they depend upon others, that is to say, wether in order to carry out their designs they have to entreat or are able to compel. In the first case they invariably succeed ill, and accomplish nothing; but when they can depend on their own strength and are able to use force, they rarely fail. Thus it comes about that all armed prophets have conquered and unarmed ones failed…
    From Machiavelli’s The Prince
    If we are to apply these wise words to actual examples of history, it is best to compare the performance of FDR with that of Adolf Hitler. They came to power within a few weeks of each other, they inherited a chaotic situation with unemployment rates hovering around the 25%. Under Hitler, it took two years to reduce unemployment to 3% whereas after six years of the New Deal, American depression was still alive and the population still suffering from a hideous malaise. Had Donald Trump come to power on the back of a third party, preferably with its own militia, he would sail through his reform programs without a hitch. But this is the USA, the land where the founding fathers made sure that no dictator would ever come to power NOT TO PROTECT DEMOCRACY WHICH EXISTED ALL ALONG IN FORM AND NOT IN SUBSTANCE , BUT TO DEFEND AND PRESERVE THE INTERESTS OF THE PREDATORY RULING CLASS.
    If we need to compare the situation of Trump with that of another democracy, we can look at the case of France under General De Gaulle. De Gaulle inherited the flawed system of the French Fourth Republic and decided to act quickly and decisively, but in order a to do so, he chose his security team from a group of extremely loyal people and never entrusted this task to the running governmental agencies. His reforms were executed in a firm and coherent way leading to the French Fifth Republic and to an economic boom coupled with an aggrandizement of French power and prestige on a grand scale. Needless to remind the reader, that under Anglo-Zionist machination, General De Gaulle decided to resign before the end of his second mandate.
    Trump’s success or failure depends on how much he can mobilize the American masses and how much he can clean his surroundings from the many Judases who are there only to sabotage him. Trump needs to address and engage the common person into a full galvanization of the masses to take to the street with the fury of a fanatical partisan. Trump should create his personal security apparatus and accept that no matter what he does to protect himself, he has to live with the danger of assassination. To deal with matters of state the way he dealt with his business endeavors will not lead him anywhere; this means that trying to accommodate the neo-cons and their ilk will put him in an ever weaker position.

  23. nickels 说:
    @jacques sheete

    Yes, E Michael Jones goes as far as to say the constitution was basically a document intended to cement the rule of the Oligarchy and the creditors and guarantee that the debtors would never attain even the slightest reprieve from their overlords.

  24. Agent76 说:
    @jacques sheete

    Then there is also this man who studied human behavior and wrote the book Propaganda literally titled propaganda.

    23年2013月XNUMX日,爱德华·伯奈斯(Edward Bernays)–“公共关系”是宣传的礼貌用语

    “公共关系之父”爱德华·伯奈斯(Edward Bernays)讲述了公共关系一词的由来。 该剪辑来自纪录片“自我世纪”,第 2 部分“同意的工程”。

  25. alan2102 说:
    @jacques sheete

    “它的设计和功能一直是事实上的resoligrcharum”

    恭喜! 谷歌很少被完全难住,但“resoligrcharum”就是这种情况。 尝试一下。 你会明白我的意思。

  26. vx37 说:

    In fact, it is the absence of real democracy, which permits the oligarchs to engage in serious intra-elite warfare. The marginalized, de-politicized electorate are incapable of taking advantage of the conflict to advance their own interests.

    This. Prime immediate cause – television and media monopoly. The elite have used the excuse of race to shut down democracy and democratic debate. This latest, and probably final, war on democracy started in America because the elites there had the proper tool at hand: blacks. “Anti-racism” is a contrivance for exploitation, whether it’s minorities feeding off the host population or elites using ethnic tensions to centralize power. It’s a type of soft colonialism against those who are soft enough to accept it. The hard occupation will come later.

    ----
    “If you want government to intervene domestically, you’re a liberal. If you want government to intervene overseas, you’re a conservative. If you want government to intervene everywhere, you’re a moderate. If you don’t want government to intervene anywhere, you’re an extremist.” – Joseph Sobran

  27. Che Guava 说:

    That automatically brought to my mind an image of the songbird of the Hanoi Hilton, John McCain, lurching up from his Senate seat, dagger in hand.

    McCain is psychologically tortured by having been a traitor to his comrades, all those years ago.

    I am glad that America lost in Vietnam, lbut one does not betray one’s comrades.

    I feel a little sorry for Trump, where he had good intentions, blocked. Installing his daughter and son-in-law as high officials was in bad taste and bad for policy. Magnanimous behaviour towards Hillary’s clear crimes was a mistake, the only return was nonsensical ‘Russki hacked the election’ becoming more intense. Of course, the latter is very convenient for those who want never to see Russia and the USA, to have a normal and civil connection.

    All of that also showed that he can’t be serious about his more interesting campaign lines.

    • 回复: @RobinG
  28. RobinG 说:
    @Che Guava

    “Magnanimous behaviour towards Hillary’s clear crimes was a mistake..”

    How true! Tomorrow her whining minions will (((March for Truth))) – useful idiots, ever. The plan is for protesters to spell out INVESTIGATE TRUMP on the Mall. Did they get a permit for a drone (illegal in DC limits) to shoot a photo?

    Someone should photo-bomb with a big LOCK HER UP ! sign. Hillary and her Foundation are what need investigating.

    • 回复: @Che Guava
  29. Agent76 说:
    @Joseph E Fasciani

    More than most even realize with a lack of participation by most in person except for a few folks. I am not a Democrat or Republican neither party speaks for me and I also have several examples from both with their vote rigged conventions and town hall meetings.

    18 年 2016 月 XNUMX 日 内华达州民主党大会真正发生了什么

    取而代之的是,媒体正试图将其转为针对伯尼,关于暴力事件和他们的不满。 如果你在场,你不会难过吗? 我不是说威胁是有道理的,但美国人民在什么时候说足够了?

  30. Che Guava 说:
    @RobinG

    Thanks. I still have some hope that Prex. Trump will do some good for your country. I think that he may have the attention-span of one of the duller varieties of insect. a bee wil spend many minutes around a flower-bed, i love to watch, and not frightened, as long as I keep track of where they are..

    Trump seems to have a shorter attention span than bumble-bees and similar species have on flowers.

    So, his first official overseas trip is to Saudia Arabia. He makes a contract for umpteen million dollars of advanced weapons to a state that will, as much as is possible, pass the portion that is portable to IS and other al-Qaeda offshoots.

    疯狂。

    Next stage, Israel, craven cowering acts and promises of fealty.

    After that the Pope, Francesco never had any trouble with Operation Condor, never once raised his voice against it.

    My opinion is that he acts mainly out of guilt

    • 回复: @RobinG
  31. RobinG 说:
    @Che Guava

    There is some hope, IF we get our act – and ourselves – together. A few people are trying to build something out of the wreckage of the *Trump and Sanders campaigns. (*Trump was a different guy in the campaign, no?)

    Very important interview –
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xtnSVkm7WCg&feature=youtu.be
    Cynthia McKinney/Sane Progressive 采访:深层状态与联合为真正的另类运动

    • 回复: @Che Guava
    , @Che Guava
  32. Che Guava 说:
    @RobinG

    Thanks, RobinG,

    I am a long-time Cynthia Mckinney fan, at the time she was in Congress, her and Ron Paul’s were the only interesting voices.

    Not being a USA person, I have no say.

    Her political assassination from the House was also interesting, massive money from obvious sources, so she was out.

    Not so interesting since, but no wonder.

  33. Che Guava 说:
    @RobinG

    I watched the vid., McKinney’s words make much sense, but the smug idiot in front of the screen, constantly stroking her own chin, posing for her webcam, ruins it.

    How amateurish to have it all on a PC screen under the gaze of Ms. Vain.

    • 回复: @RobinG
  34. RobinG 说:
    @Che Guava

    LOL. It’s true that Debbie has a rather annoying style, but if you can ignore that, she makes some good points. (Kind of like eating tripe.) She also has quite a loyal following, and apparently 80,000 viewers, so maybe she’s gotten too comfortable in front of the camera. And actually, she’s not posing for the camera. She’s reading messages as they come in from viewers.

    Here’s her interview of Vanessa Beeley. Since we’re in the throes of absurdity (yesterday’s “March for Truth” was anything but) it’s valuable to have honest journalism, even if it’s not technically slick.

    Vanessa Beely On White Helmets, Syria w Sane Progressive Interview

    • 回复: @Che Guava
  35. Che Guava 说:
    @RobinG

    Thx. Robin. I will watching it later.

    I do know how difficult video conversion and editing are, am trying to organise hours of band photos and vids onto video CDs and DVDs. If they want to upload them, it is up to them, as long as I get a credit.

    My own, too.

    Of course, that is old-fashioned, I know. In most cases, I have permission for uploading, but I don’t want to do it that way.

    OTOH, Ms. Vain didn’t even switch to a direct view of Cynthia. That would not be so difficult, same kind of streaming format.

    I will also to repeating, the chin stroking seems compulsive.

    Have a friend who also does, and his nose, and also is someone who tries to feel very superior, it is like the symptom of a complex. Really creeps another friend out. Just makes me uneasy.

    • 回复: @RobinG
  36. RobinG 说:
    @Che Guava

    Che, I’m not disagreeing with you (her solo rants when she has no guest can be especially annoying) but she did demonstrate at one point that putting the monitor with Cynthia head-on caused excessive glare.

    What interests me most is the project of Cynthia, Robert Steele, and others to bridge the gap between different ideological groups, to make common cause to expose, confront, depose the Deep State. I have yet to meet anyone who shares my viewpoint entirely, but I’m happy to cooperate with almost anybody on issues I consider essential.

当前评论者
说:

发表评论-对超过两周的文章发表评论,将在质量和语气上进行更严格的判断


 记得 我的信息为什么?
 电子邮件回复我的评论
$
提交的评论已被许可给 Unz评论 并可以由后者自行决定在其他地方重新发布
在翻译模式下禁用评论
通过RSS订阅此评论主题 通过RSS订阅所有James Petras评论