Unz评论•另类媒体选择$
美国主流媒体大都排除了有趣,重要和有争议的观点
 博客浏览詹姆斯·汤普森档案馆
哈里,英国和圣乔治的上帝
通过电子邮件将此页面发送给其他人

 记住我的信息



=>

书签 全部切换总目录添加到图书馆从图书馆中删除 • B
显示评论下一个新评论下一个新回复了解更多
回复同意/不同意/等等 更多... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
同意不同意谢谢LOL轮唱
这些按钮可将您的公开协议,异议,感谢,LOL或巨魔与所选注释一起注册。 仅对最近使用“记住我的信息”复选框保存姓名和电子邮件的频繁评论者可用,并且在任何八个小时的时间内也只能使用三次。
忽略评论者 关注评论者
搜寻文字 区分大小写  确切的词  包括评论
列表 书签

王室是一个投射测试:它被设计成一个所有公民都能认同的国家的象征。 他们需要在那个家庭中看到足够的东西,才能想象自己是其中的一部分。 这个家族,凭借某种历史成就,被选为一国人民的楷模,值得捍卫、钦佩、效仿:它应该树立榜样,将民族凝聚在一起。 对于被选中的家庭来说,这是一个浮士德式的交易:一个非常好的生活标准,以换取良好的行为和体现国家价值观。 奢侈品需要服务作为回报,其中一部分服务是公开展示的。

就部落间的竞争而言,这是有道理的。 在与跨山部落打交道时,您希望您的代表看起来尽可能好。 无论您的部落多么贫困,您的代表必须穿着得体,在接待访客时能够进行令人印象深刻的表演,并且能够在访问其他国家时提供礼物作为回报。 观念很重要。 给人留下好印象可以带来更好的贸易关系,甚至可以避免战争。

这些历史先例现在似乎不那么重要了,但奇怪的是,没有官方王室的国家往往会被英国女王或他们自己的特殊政治家庭所吸引。 在美国政治上,更多的关注那些姓氏的人,如布什、克林顿、奥巴马,以及肯尼迪和未来的特朗普。 法国将他们的王室成员送上了断头台,但仍然对水上的王室成员感兴趣。 血统是一个因素,即使人们说它不应该是。

YouGov 的调查显示,英国公民对哈里和梅根的看法存在巨大的代际差异。 18 到 24 岁的人对这对年轻夫妇表示同情,而 50 岁以上的人则不会。 当然,观众的年龄并不能确定事情的真相。 此外,很多人不感兴趣,或者至少说他们不感兴趣。 YouGov 的最新民意调查显示,哈里王子的净评分下降了 15 个百分点至负值 -3,梅根下降了 14 个百分点,净评分为 -27。

事实核查现已开始。 诸如哪些大王室成员获得哪些头衔以及受到何种程度的保护等问题引发了质疑。 在这一点上,这对年轻夫妇似乎误解了 1917 年制定的标准程序。对于坎特伯雷大主教是否会在没有证人在场的情况下私​​下与他们结婚,并在三天后进行大规模的猜谜游戏,存在相当大的疑问,违反所有法律和宗教要求。 同样值得怀疑的是关于无法获得护照的说法,因为在那个时期有大量的外国旅行,而女王是唯一一个没有护照旅行的人。 记者浏览了英国新闻头版提供的敌对报道样本,发现其中许多是由海外媒体撰写的,或者是在这对夫妇已经离开公众生活之后。 早期的负面新闻大多是因为他们在乘坐私人飞机时倡导全球变暖预防措施。 他们提出的其他声明很难评估,尤其是关于婴儿肤色的声明。 以后再说。 奇怪的是,由于所有这些都集中在皇室作为一个家庭,采访并没有对马克尔斯作为一个家庭进行相应的检查。

不可否认,人们对哈里和梅根所说的话很感兴趣。 一个王室要发挥其象征作用,就必须有点神秘。 很自然地想知道女王是什么样的。 我参加过女王在场的活动,她很亲切,很有能力。 一个小故事:在她为公民领袖提供的丰盛午餐时,她坐在我们旁边的圆桌旁。 之后我问了坐在她旁边的那个人,当地的屠夫。 他说,在任何一次招待会上,他通常都坐在 20 号桌旁,但这次不得不搜索整个董事会才发现,令他大惊的是,他坐在她旁边。 假设他应该只在与他交谈时说话,他说:“在 20 秒内,很明显我们将进行一次普通的对话”。 我问他的印象是什么。 他回答说“非常出色的模仿者”。 没有多少人知道这一点。

今天,在与学童举行的关于科学的 Zoom 会议上,女王被问到尤里·加加林是什么样的人。 她面无表情地回答:俄罗斯人。 然后加入了笑声。

卡米拉参加临终关怀新翼的开幕式,来看望我们一位垂死的朋友,她很迷人,和她聊了很长时间。 令我惊讶的是,我们的朋友对她的访问感到非常感动。 一位密友发现,与爱丁堡公爵交谈很有趣。 当女王访问剑桥三一学院时,她告诉另一位朋友她在查尔斯学习时非常喜欢拜访他。 我与玛格丽特公主的儿子林雷勋爵就他的精美家具业务进行了长时间的交谈。 发现我是一名心理学家后,他打趣道:“我过得怎么样?” 并继续描述他的工作。 朋友们与戴安娜夫人进行了长时间的友好交谈,他们一直记得。 一位伤亡顾问告诉我,访问医院的政客通常被认为是令人讨厌的(他想到的是撒切尔夫人),但如果有一位皇室成员出现,每个人至少都会微笑四天。 皇室与大家见面。 这是工作描述的一部分,他们通常看起来很喜欢它。

在那些 50 岁以上的人中,对哈里和梅根的指控感到相当恼火,并且有一种背叛的感觉。 他们的婚礼是一场盛大的活动,按照他们想要的方式设计,并受到公众的欢迎。 他们很受欢迎。 最终,考虑到他们的私人旅行,他们关于全球变暖的讲座开始刺激神经。 (出于同样的原因,查尔斯王子受到了同样的待遇)。 皇室成员过着迷人的生活,但当虚伪被揭露时,他们不会抱怨。

现在到宝宝的肤色,根据实际或潜在的评论。 哈里说,种族主义是他放弃王室职责并离开他的国家的主要原因。 一些评论人士的说法是,这一指控需要王室深刻反省。 好吧,让我们考虑一下如果他们这样做会发生什么。 他们会注意到他们已经接受了一个离婚的人进入这个家庭,为这对夫妇举办了一场华丽而非常昂贵的婚礼,其中有牧师和合唱团庆祝新娘的非洲传统,给了他们一所漂亮的房子,看着他们获得了巨大的声望和公众喜爱,然后很快就崩溃了,公开指责种族主义。 呐喊种族主义的全部意义在于,这一指控是无可辩驳的。 没有善行算作赦免。 只要原告(全心全意地)声称他们受到了不公平的对待,案件就得到了证明,剩下的就是确定判决。 经过这么多思考,王室可能会想回到包办婚姻。

我在 2019 年 XNUMX 月拍摄了哈利的照片,当时他是皇家医院创始人日的贵宾,皇家医院是“战乱”士兵的养老院。 每个人都想见他,都饶有兴致地看着他和被介绍给他的人聊天。 看来他的未来在于帮助陆军慈善机构,赢得公众的赞誉。

年轻的评论家提到这对夫妇和“Ginge & Cringe”。 年长的评论家更喜欢“公爵夫人难与人质”。

尽管公众有许多不同的反应,但我经常听到的是:

可怜的哈里。

 
• 类别: 文化/社会 •标签: 英国, 哈里王子 
隐藏60条评论发表评论
忽略评论者...跟随Endorsed Only
修剪评论?
    []
  1. dearieme 说:

    As you know, doc, my contact with the famous is always rather tenuous. A child did, however, meet Charles and Camilla at a garden party. “What were they like?” I asked. “Obviously adored each other” she said. “Just as well” says I.

    As for this sorry pair: he’s a twerp and she’s a crook, according to a friend of mine. I’d bid higher than “twerp” myself.

    • 回复: @pyrrhus
    , @Paperback Writer
  2. Dan Hayes 说:

    汤普森教授,

    Thanks for a very humane and judicious evaluation of the (accursed) Royal Family!

  3. The US should consider sanctions and a regime change war if Harry is not allowed to become King. Proud millennial for Harry.

    • 哈哈: Dan Hayes
    • 回复: @for-the-record
    , @El Dato
  4. Miro23 说:

    我在2019年XNUMX月为哈利(Harry)拍照,当时他是皇家医院(Royal Hospital)创始人日(Founders Day)的贵宾,皇家医院是因“战争折磨”的士兵的养老院。 每个人都想见他,与他聊天的人聊天时兴致勃勃地看着他。 他的未来似乎在于帮助陆军慈善机构赢得公众的赞誉。

    Being friendly and doing charity work isn’t enough. The Royal Family urgently needs to validate itself by defending British people and British traditions against Wokes. The government and media aren’t going to do anything and Harry is clueless idiot who needs to be disowned.

    • 回复: @Excal
  5. ruralguy 说:

    Interesting insights into the Royal Family and their functional need to reflect the persona of the British. The British do want the Royals to project a Victorian image. But, those characteristics no longer reflect the British. Princess Diana, Prince William, and Duchess Kate have/do exemplify the social manners, but lack the intelligence and leadership traits that led Britain into such a prominent world role. Harry and Meghan Markle don’t project any image even remotely noble. But, dysfunctional Harry and Meghan do a better job in reflecting the dysfunctional characteristics of modern British and Americans. As the world is finding, there is no nobility in the modern British and Americans, to reflect in a Royal Family. The British can’t keep pretending the British and their reflective Royals are Victorian.

    • 回复: @Boomthorkell
  6. Every member of Her Majesty’s Armed Forces has to sign an Oath of Allegiance to Queen and Country.

    Harry made a conscious choice to break his oath to his Queen and His Country, but not before securing the legal and commercial rights and global patents of the brand name “Sussex Royal” and securing hundred millions of dollars deals with NETFLIX and SPOTIFY.

    Just like his wife, who amazingly survived her “almost unsurvivable” sentence within the institutionally racist British Royal Family, they are now doing surprisingly well possibly because shit always floats.

    Quite unlike the many thousands of other British and Commonwealth armed forces personnel who were killed or physically maimed/disfigured/permenantly disabled through their service to their Queen and Country who don’t ever get to escape.

    Harry walked away. As an ex serving member of Her Majesty’s Armed Forces, I’d prefer if Harry stayed away.

    And this includes from the Invictus Games.

    Our permanently disfigured and disabled service personnel who are really “trapped ” deserve better.

    Our Queen and our Country deserve better.

    I wonder what Harry’s (QUOTE) ” Little Paki friend” would think?

  7. There’s nothing better than this tale of woe concerning Harry, his mulatto and Oprah Winfrey to show the depressing state of the communal intellect of the Western world.

    I suspect the biggest embarrassment to the British Royal Family in all of this is that one of their own has been clearly revealed as being as thick-as-a-plank. In the public’s eye, his marrying the vulgar mulatto in the first place might have been put down to PTSD, as Harry did spend time in a war zone.

    The mulatto told childish lie after lie. They had not been wedded by the archbishop a few days prior to the televised wedding, it was a wedding rehearsal they had attended. The mulatto, though, might not have actually known the difference.

    Her portrayal that her and Harry’s son wasn’t designated a Prince due to the Royal Family being racist was also a blatant lie. It’s protocol for Harry’s sons to not be elevated to the rank of Princes until Harry’s father (Charles?) ascends the Throne.

    Harry backed-up his bit of trailer-trash in these very childish taunts to the Royal Family. That he did so can only be put down to crass stupidity. But then, his airhead mother took up with a playboy Arab and flaunted herself in front of the cameras to spite her former inlaws.

    Albeit, the Royal Family won’t mind that Harry and his mulatto have knocked Prince Andrew’s very close associations and interactions with proven peadophiles from the public consciousness.

    The British have a shower of taxpayer funded perverts and airheads with estates worth in the billions to laud it over them. And the Americans have Oprah Winfrey.

    How this witless piece-of-tripe became a muli-millionaire via broadcasting, only God knows. Her interviewing technique is disgusting, she hasn’t got the curiosity of a dead sheep. No curiosity points to a vacuous intellect, which in turn means low IQ. And to top that, no matter who her guests are she’ll sit there in front of them with a regal air.

    If Winfrey was to have a private audience with the British Queen, it’s the latter who’d be expected to curtsy.

    They say something like 50 million people watched the interview. I’d guess about 80 percent of these viewers might as well have spent the hour and a half watching paint dry on a wall, because they’d have sat there and ingested nothing from it except the odd sound-bite thrown out by Winfrey. Afterwards they’d have had to go to Facebook and Twitter to see how they should react to it.

    The West? Whom the Gods want to destroy, they first make mad. Except in this case they’ve obviously opted for stupid instead of mad.

    • 同意: Curmudgeon
    • 回复: @for-the-record
    , @Anon
  8. @ruralguy

    At some point the Monarchy and the people need to focus on what is actually uplifting in English characteristics and Race, and then go from there.

    What must be remade, reformed, reborn, or changed. Something organic.

  9. Dan Hayes 说:

    The Commonwealth is a multiracial project that the Royal Family is wholeheartedly wedded to. Initially that is why QE II wholeheartedly welcomed the mulatto aboard. Because of a racially aggrieved actress (an incendiary combination), it didn’t quite turn out the way it was hoped for!

    • 回复: @LondonBob
  10. Somewhere, if memory serves me correctly, there’s a photo of Harry in a Nazi uniform. I think of him as just a cheeky kid.

    • 回复: @El Dato
  11. LondonBob 说:
    @Dan Hayes

    The Commonwealth needs ditching for many reasons, the Royal Family should be British only (although NZ, Aus and Can may also keep her) and we need to end the delusions of Empire (how may of our armed services are from the Commonwealth, no soldiers no opportunity to interfere).

    Private Eye actually managed a rare moment of amusing satire of Meghan.

    I suspect much of the age difference toward Harry is simply ethnicity, as well as the stupidity of youth.

    • 谢谢: Dan Hayes
  12. @Supply and Demand

    The US should consider sanctions and a regime change war if Harry is not allowed to become King

    How sexist and misogynist, and racist too!

    The US should consider sanctions and a regime change war if Meghan is not allowed to become Queen.

    • 哈哈: The Alarmist
  13. @ForeverGone

    How this witless piece-of-tripe became a muli-millionaire via broadcasting

    REAL TIME NET WORTH as of 3/14/21: \$2.7B

    https://www.forbes.com/profile/oprah-winfrey/

  14. Chinaman 说:

    Now to the skin colour of the baby, based on comments actual or potential. Harry said that racism was a large part of the reason he gave up his royal duties and left his country. The line taken by some commentators is that the accusation requires the royal family to reflect deeply.

    I think it will look yellowish… Like my skin colour. The kid will look like a chinese kid.

    I think everyone should be concerned, not so much about color but the baby’s IQ. Harry is not very smart to begin with.

    Corrupting the Royal bloodline with some African DNA is just the last straw we need, beside Brexit, to begin the disintegration of the UK.

  15. Anon[712]• 免责声明 说:

    They should be stripped of all money and privileges and banished from Great Britain for the rest of their lives.

  16. Anon[712]• 免责声明 说:
    @ForeverGone

    “How this witless piece-of-tripe became a muli-millionaire via broadcasting, only God knows. Her interviewing technique is disgusting, she hasn’t got the curiosity of a dead sheep. No curiosity points to a vacuous intellect, which in turn means low IQ. And to top that, no matter who her guests are she’ll sit there in front of them with a regal air.”

    Like Rap music, she’s a totally Jewish creation. They wanted to have another black celebrity for all the millions of brain dead whites to drool over. Now the mouth-breathing masses have believed for 35 years now that this bloated, negress is actually intelligent because she can talk to people on television with questions written by others and come out with books that have been ghost written.

  17. AndrewR 说:

    How many times will you call them “the young couple”? Certainly compared to the queen and her fossilized husband, they are young, but Harry is 36 and Meg will be 40 this year. Calling them young minimizes their agency and their role in contributing to the mess that they and Harry’s kin have found themselves.

    • 回复: @James Thompson
  18. El Dato 说:
    @Supply and Demand

    Photos proving that Biden is currently receiving (((instructions))) regarding this:

    • 回复: @Reactionary Utopian
  19. @El Dato

    好极了!

    The spice must flow. And the idea of Biden living out the rest of his short-ass life in a pain amplifier is a cheerful one.

  20. @AndrewR

    Yes, on reflection I agree with you! They are certainly above the age of consent. Perhaps I was reluctant to call them adults.

    • 回复: @AndrewR
    , @Curmudgeon
  21. Royal Family is a projective test: it is designed to be an emblem of a nation with which all citizens can identify

    First thought – fine. Second thought: Designed? Third (rather ironic) thought: Intelligent design? Fourth thought: 标志叹息 are onomatopoetic cousins or – relatives in the Kingdom of Speech (Tom Wolfe) which, with an eye on Shakespeare you could assume would trump over Kings and Queens quite easily.
    Does Harry get this stuff? – It is hard to be married to a depressive and otherwise not overly gifted woman, pretty as she might be.

    Thanks for describing how you personally are related to your Royal Family, Mr. Thompson. Meet and greet – simple pleasures delivered with style. Widely underestimated, not only by your colleagues, the psychologists.

  22. Sean 说:

    Very interesting photograph; the profile of Harry’s convex nose is much more like his mother’s lover James Hewitt, than either of his high-bridged large-nosed parents. Harry’s exploits (sticking his hand up the jumper of his nanny of his nanny/companion the then Alexandra Shân “Tiggy” Legge-Bourke and grabbing her breasts, heavy drinking and smoking cannabis at 17, getting photographed nude in Vegas after stripping in front of women he hardly knew who then sold the snaps, and worst of all joining the 军队 rather than the navy) would be less odd were he actually the son of the feckless thicko (failed the exam for promotion to major three times) womanizing Hewitt. Prince Harry may well be Charles’s son, but I suspect the royal family, possibly on the wrong grounds, are not terribly surprised at the way he turned out.

  23. Tor597 说:

    Good riddance to the Royals.

    They spread wokeness throughout the world, but now that it has come back to bite them in the ass they are complaining about it lol.

  24. Excal 说:
    @Miro23

    他们不能。 政客们不会放任他们。

  25. As Trump said: I wish him a lot of luck, he’s gonna need it.

    Harry degrades himself worse than the Duke of Windsor ever did. I give it 2 more years max and then done.

    • 回复: @AndrewR
  26. AndrewR 说:
    @James Thompson

    Well, many people stop maturing psychologically at a very young age. But chronologically H+M are basically middle aged.

  27. AndrewR 说:
    @restless94110

    多得多。

    David never wanted to abdicate per se. He just really felt he needed Wallis as his wife. Today, no one would care if she were on her third marriage.

    And also, from what I can tell, Wallis kind of felt trapped and forced to marry him. He apparently threatened suicide if she left him. Meanwhile, Meghan has been the primary manipulator with Harry. I doubt she threatened suicide to get him to marry her, but I’m sure she used the threat thereof to get him to leave the firm and trash his family.

    • 回复: @Dieter Kief
  28. David never wanted to abdicate per se. He just really felt he needed Wallis as his wife. Today, no one would care if she were on her third marriage.

    I don’t see that as any different from Harry and Markel. And I don’t believe it would go down well if Charles ascended to the throne today. But that’s not the point. The point was the similarities between David and Harry in their weakness towards their women.

    I also do not see how you could possibly know the state of Wallis’ heart from 100 years ago. It seemed she was pretty durn happy to be in wedded bliss. Trapped into marrying? That doesn’t float no matter what you’ve read or think.

    But one thing is not clear: you doubt she threatened suicide to get him to marry her, but you are sure she threatened suicide to get him to leave the royal family? For one, once Harry was her what other possible alternative was there but to marry her? Harry wasn’t going to just shack up with her and start popping out kids left and right.

    For another, there are other ways for an unhappy wife to get her weak man to make her happy again, other than threatening suicide. She didn’t need to go that far, and I hardly think she did. Like that other weak male Bruce Springsteen has said numerous times: happy wife, happy life.

    The problem is the invasion of the Beta Males in western culture. It will end in tears for both sexes. Yes there are only two.

    • 回复: @Curmudgeon
  29. Poor guy. He may be a fool (he could have had his pick of young British girls) but I still feel sorry for him, as in some ways I still see that child following his mother’s coffin.

    He’s a hostage now – imagine what he’ll be accused of if they split. Or what salacious details she’ll go public with.

    I’m seriously worried for him.

    (The Royal Family are the totem of our British tribe.)

    • 回复: @dearieme
    , @Angharad
  30. anonymous[363]• 免责声明 说:

    You didn’t mention the Royal Family including William and Kate acting as an organized unit covering up for Prince Andrew. The institution is discredited.

    • 同意: Angharad
  31. dearieme 说:
    @YetAnotherAnon

    he could have had his pick of young British girls

    Gossip asserts that two had turned him down.

    • 回复: @YetAnotherAnon
  32. @dearieme

    “Gossip asserts that two had turned him down.”

    Nonetheless he would have (probably did) cleaned up with what remains of the county set, and plenty of ambitious upper-middles like the Middletons would have been interested.

    Meghan’s family bring a whole new scale of dysfunctional to the table. Her father and various half-siblings I can’t believe – Dad saying giving up the UK is a huge mistake (true, but surely highly impolitic) and a half-sibling predicting divorce (ditto) – can’t they keep their mouths shut?

    Her mother seems to be the only one with the sense to “lay low and say nuthin’”.

    As I say, I am very worried for Harry – all his pictures show a man, like Nahum Gardner in the Lovecraft story, walking half in another world between lines of nameless guards to a certain and familiar doom.

    https://www.hplovecraft.com/writings/texts/fiction/cs.aspx

    • 回复: @Angharad
  33. Curmudgeon 说:
    @James Thompson

    变老是不可避免的。 长大是可选的。

  34. Curmudgeon 说:
    @restless94110

    The point was the similarities between David and Harry in their weakness towards their women.

    Charles reportedly asked a reporter if he should be the only Prince of Wales not to have a mistress. He, Randy Andy, and Edward were getting more ass than a toilet seat. Given all of Charles’ arranged prospects were Roman Catholics not willing to convert, he was forced to look at a “lower” tier, but he always preferred Camilla, who was not acceptable due to her “partying” ways. It comes with the territory, and always has e.g. Bertie (Edward VII) had Lily Langtree. Sometimes, as with Elizabeth and Victoria, they actually got what they wanted.

    • 回复: @restless94110
  35. @Curmudgeon

    I don’t speak Royalish so I’ll try to muck through your obtuse reply.

    Why would Charles talk to a reporter about who he wanted to fuck? How old was Princie baby at that time?

    Not sure who Andy, Randy, Sandy, Pandy, Mandy (shout out to Barry Manilow), and even Randy Andy are, but glad they were getting laid by someone, but do we care? I certainly don’t.

    Who would have arranged prospects for Charles that weren’t really prospects (to by his wife, I assume is your meaning) since they would not convert? I would have recommended that Charles fire his prospect getter as being totally inept.

    So Charles was forced to look at a lower tier? Does that mean Diana? Who was upper tier?

    We know he was a weak tea kind or person after it was revealed he said he wanted to be her tampon, but why was she a suitable prospect at all whether she was a party girl or not? I thought she was a commoner?

    And who wasn’t she acceptable to? Mama Queenie? That just means even more that Charles is a weak man. I still don’t get what the deal is with Camilla. She looks like a horse past due for the glue factory.

    Finally, do tell: that did Lizzie and Vicki want and what did they get?? Hot stud action? In 1890? Wow this is getting good!

    Oh by the way what does this have to do with Henpecked Harry and his deranged wife?

    • 回复: @Curmudgeon
  36. Angharad 说:
    @YetAnotherAnon

    Errr….if the bride’s own family is loudly and publicly WARNING you to ditch her – you should listen.

  37. Angharad 说:
    @YetAnotherAnon

    That repulsive grifting family are PRETENDERS – and the lot should be chucked into the Atlantic ocean. WHY would you worry about that TRASH? Harry is a physical adult. He married a darker version of his mother. Any one stupid enough to marry that Markle horror deserves what they get – and boy oh boy is he getting it. By the time she’s done with him – he’ll be found in month old underwear, covered in drool and vomit, in a crack motel in East LA a month after he’s gone missing.

    • 回复: @YetAnotherAnon
  38. Curmudgeon 说:
    @restless94110

    The reporter questioned Charles about his dicking Camilla while married to Diana.
    For those paying attention, the press called Andrew “Randy Andy” because he took a lot of “vacations” with single young women.
    Arranged marriages are the norm among the elite. Princess Marie Astrid of Luxembourg was supposed to fill the spot, but as a RC, would not agree to raising the children as Anglicans.
    The system is complex. https://victorian-era.org/royal-british-nobility.html The five titles of the peerage, in descending order of precedence, or rank, are: duke, marquess, earl, viscount, baron. The highest rank of the peerage, duke, is the most exclusive. Diana Spencer, was the daughter of an Earl, a lower rank of peerage. She too was a RC but agreed to allow the children to be raised as Anglicans.
    The Queen is the Head of the Anglican Church, So, yes she would have been unacceptable, because the reigning Monarch has to be minimally, a Protestant. Descendants raised as Roman Catholics cannot be a British Monarch.
    While an arranged marriage, Victoria was committed to Albert beyond the duty of producing an heir. Elizabeth chose Phil because she was attracted to him. The family had other plans.
    What this has to do with Henpecked Harry, is that he caught jungle fever, and let his little head think for the big one. One day, he will wake up wondering WTF he’s done.

  39. What this has to do with Henpecked Harry, is that he caught jungle fever, and let his little head think for the big one. One day, he will wake up wondering WTF he’s done.

    I don’t even think it’s that. Markel appears singularly unsexy and unattractive. I can’t imagine her being interesting in bed. She has a cloud of witnesses attesting to her nasty, testy behavior.

    I really see Harry as just a weak men.

    I think I confused you with my reply because a good 4 sentences were about Camilla. The tampon reference especially. He wasn’t just dicking here. In fact, it appears that she has the dick, not he.

    I’m so glad Lizzy and Vicky had pleasure in their marriages. Many arranged marriages can work out that way anyway, it’s not so bad.

    I can’t imagine Henpecked Harry sticking around for more than a couple of years more. And how preposterous that anyone would vote Markel in for President of the US? It is end of days, me Lord.

  40. 公平地说,在现实生活中,我认识的大多数夫妇中,有一个人嫁给了一个非常困难的人,另一个人(也许是出于偶然的原因,也许不是,我总是太客气了!)也嫁给了一个困难的人。人。

    很高兴听到(从汤姆森博士的职位轶事中得知)王室与英国人交往时通常礼貌且渴望履行其职责。 不过,在美国,我遇到了几个与暴民有关系的人,他们同样具有超凡魅力(在这里开玩笑)

    • 回复: @James Thompson
  41. @AndrewR

    Now she sees the chance to become US President. – Dr. Freud would have been quite satisfied with the outcome of her decision to leave the Royal Family. Even though her state of mind would not be too easy to diagnose: Would he lean towards calling it a hysterical reaction and/or an overcompensation? That would be my first guesses.

    • 回复: @dearieme
  42. dearieme 说:
    @Dieter Kief

    If the requirement of being a US president is now to be that one must rattle one’s sabre at Russia and China simultaneously then this devious narcissist may be just the woman for the job.

    • 回复: @James Thompson
  43. @James Thompson

    A tough comedy about the Anglo public-sphere with her presidential ambitions etc. should be in the works. I think of Evelyn Waugh and/or Robert Altman. Tom Wolfe. // P. J. O’Rourke/Hunter S. Thompson/Terry Gilliam (my dream team). // Theodore Dalrymple. If only T. C. Boyle understood the political world better – or if only Jonathan Franzen would not be so – polite.

    (In No. 44 I spoke not only about a possible reaction of Dr. Freud but also of Dr. Adler (overcompensation) but did not mention him.)

  44. dearieme 说:
    @James Thompson

    我开了个玩笑,但只是在第二次观看时。 我怪辉瑞。

    • 回复: @James Thompson
  45. @Angharad

    “Harry is a physical adult.”

    Plenty of physical adults carry a hurt child within. Now that’s not an excuse for behaving like a child, but we should have compassion for human frailty.

  46. pyrrhus 说:
    @dearieme

    至于哈里·休伊特(Harry Hewitt)(如并排的照片所示,他和爸爸詹姆斯可能是同卵双胞胎),他是一个勇敢而受人欢迎的士兵,应该坚持参加那场比赛,而不是嫁给一个诡计多端的泼妇并假装成皇家。 …。

    • 回复: @dearieme
  47. dearieme 说:
    @pyrrhus

    我看过一张照片,比较了哈利和他的祖父菲利普亲王同龄。 随地吐痰的图像。

    • 同意: Philip Owen
    • 回复: @Paperback Writer
  48. @dearieme

    如果您仔细观察,哈利也会像查尔斯一样。 眼睛是一样的。 我从不相信休伊特的故事。

  49. @Paperback Writer

    ,,我认识她,但我不知道她声称的理由是关于Harry无法驾驶直升机。

  50. 他们的依据不是他们让他成为飞行员,而是让他成为一名副驾驶。

    • 回复: @James Thompson
  51. @Paperback Writer

    美好的。 那是等级上的差异,但是副驾驶仍然可以完成很多飞行任务。 如果哈利从未飞行过,那将是一件好事。

    • 谢谢: Paperback Writer
  52. 他确实飞了。 您会认为有人会指出这一点。 报纸上的反驳文章充斥着关于哈利“为祖国服务”的话题,这毫无意义。 我一直怀疑,如果他把它弄烂了,他们就永远不会把他放到直升机上,特别是当他当时排在第二位的时候。

  53. Reg Cæsar 说:
    @Paperback Writer

    这个工党是正确的吗?

    如果反共主义者解散并将其咬在屁股上,他们将不会认出真正的共和国。 这个单词 民兵 吓them他们。

当前评论者
说:

发表评论 -


 记得 我的信息为什么?
 电子邮件回复我的评论
$
提交的评论已被许可给 Unz评论 并可以由后者自行决定在其他地方重新发布
在翻译模式下禁用评论
通过RSS订阅此评论主题 通过RSS订阅所有James Thompson的评论