Unz评论•另类媒体选择$
美国主流媒体大都排除了有趣,重要和有争议的观点
 播客凯文·巴雷特(Kevin Barrett)档案
互联网审查和觉醒意图的暴政
为什么乔丹彼得森对艾略特佩奇的乳房是正确的
通过电子邮件将此页面发送给其他人

 记住我的信息



=>

书签 全部切换总目录添加到图书馆从图书馆中删除 • B
显示评论下一个新评论下一个新回复了解更多
回复同意/不同意/等等 更多... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
同意不同意谢谢LOL轮唱
这些按钮可将您的公开协议,异议,感谢,LOL或巨魔与所选注释一起注册。 仅对最近使用“记住我的信息”复选框保存姓名和电子邮件的频繁评论者可用,并且在任何八个小时的时间内也只能使用三次。
忽略评论者 关注评论者
搜寻文字 区分大小写  确切的词  包括评论
列表 书签

视频链接

多年来,Cat McGuire(在上面观看她 本周的假旗周报) 是纽约市最敏锐、最有活力的左翼活动家之一。 2016年她带我去左派论坛讲解 为什么诺姆·乔姆斯基在 9/11 上错了.

去纽约左翼论坛攻击乔姆斯基就像去梵蒂冈诋毁教皇,所以我应该知道我们是在自找麻烦。 Cat 很快发现自己与其他左派论坛的组织者陷入了困境。 第二年,左翼论坛给我买了一张机票,但随后取消了我的演讲活动,并禁止我和其他 9/11 怀疑论者。 猫和一些志同道合的同事通过组织回应 被排除在外的论坛,这发生在同一栋楼里,就在那些禁止我们的人的大厅里。

猫,在感觉越来越“被冷落”之后,终于离开了左边。 她有很多理由。 但到目前为止,最重要的是群众形成觉醒的瘟疫,它导致了左翼新斯大林主义对审查制度的拥护。

觉醒的审查员自认为是善良、体贴、宽容的人,并将受害者视为可恶的偏执狂和错误信息传播者。 他们认为他们正在捍卫“历史上被边缘化的群体”并保护人们免受危险思想的侵害。 当然,这与中国共产党审查人员的想法非常接近。 二十年前,甚至可能是十年前,谁也没想到,大科技会抛弃言论自由的启蒙理想,变得与中共几乎无异。

最新的推特审查丑闻引发了这个阴暗有趣的标题:

主流媒体不会转发“仇恨推文”,这让读者很难理解被禁止的内容和原因。 所以我发现 彼得森的回击视频 其中包括推文的镜头及其据称违反的规则。

似乎一些名叫艾伦“叫我艾伦”佩奇的女演员决定割掉她的乳房,以增强她对自己显然不是的东西的声称:一个男人。 至少,我(大概是彼得森)是这样描述这种情况的。

然而,Twitter 醒悟的审查员不同意。 他们认为人们有权假装自己选择的任何性别,可能数量不限,并强迫他人假装相信他们。 残害和激素中毒是受欢迎的,但可选的。

他们认为教师应该将这种观点推向儿童,并说服他们——甚至背着父母——被肢解。

在我居住的威斯康星州西部农村,绝大多数人认为唤醒旅显然是疯了。 我怀疑至少有一半的美国人口倾向于同意。

但互联网委员认为彼得森的推文可能会伤害艾伦佩奇的感情。 他们将性别伪装者视为“历史上被边缘化的社区”。 他们只是想保护这些人免受可恶的欺凌。

唯一目的是仇恨欺凌的言论可能是站不住脚的,即使它受到宪法保护。 但乔丹·彼得森的“可恶”推文是对一个具有重大公共政策影响的热门话题的辩论的一种极其诙谐的贡献。 纵观第一修正案的判例历史,法官们一直指出,最“冒犯性”的言论应该得到最多的保护,而第一修正案的目的是让人们就当今的问题进行热烈的辩论。 即使是最令人反感的言论,例如淫秽和色情内容,如果具有赎回的社会或艺术价值,也可以得到保护。 第一修正案旨在保护的那种可赎回的社会价值首先是对有关公共政策问题的严肃公开辩论的“冒犯性”但具有挑衅性的贡献。

我意识到法院已经裁定 Twitter 可以无视第一修正案和美国传统的言论自由原则,只要它喜欢就行。 如果它想审查辩论的一方以确保另一方获胜——或操纵其算法以确保一个政党击败另一个政党——那是完全合法的。

那些法庭裁决,就像性别伪装者和他们的辩护者一样,无疑是疯狂的。 通过摧毁言论自由作为一个事实,如果不是作为一个理论理想,互联网寡头最终将迫使愤怒的大多数人拿起武器,并在军事上而不是口头上赢得辩论。

(从重新发布 亚组 经作者或代表的许可)
 
• 类别: 思想 •标签: 检查, 约旦彼得森, 政治上的正确, Twitter 
隐藏14条评论发表评论
忽略评论者...跟随Endorsed Only
修剪评论?
    []
  1. JWalters 说:

    In my view people who call themselves “left” or “liberal” and favor censorship are fake, paid wolves in sheep’s clothing. They are moles and provocateurs hired to help destroy and control society. Their self-proclaimed labels should not be accepted; they should be outed as the frauds they are.

    Certainly “odd” people should not be harassed for their oddity, be it race, religion, or erotic preferences. But it also looks to me like such bigotry, and the response to it, is being fanned intentionally to disrupt society. A clear example is coercing society to accept a person in a male body competing in sports against a field of people in female bodies. The fact that he 祝愿 he had a female body does not alter the physical fact that in all obvious fairness he/”she” should be competing against other male bodies.

    This manufactured chaos is tied in with the campaign to create and then stamp out “domestic terrorism”. The global and domestic “terrorism” focus was designed from the start to crush civil liberties and control society by a group of supremacist sociopaths.

    • 同意: Kali
  2. Hitmarck 说:
    @Hitmarck

    I mean, Peterson tells us here Dave is not a child abusing piece of shit, but as great a parent as Peterson himself is.
    Very Islam compatible.

  3. Durruti 说:

    那些法庭裁决,就像性别伪装者和他们的辩护者一样,无疑是疯狂的。 通过摧毁言论自由作为一个事实,如果不是作为一个理论理想,互联网寡头最终将迫使愤怒的大多数人拿起武器,并在军事上而不是口头上赢得辩论。

    Not sure where you are going with this concluding summary of your article.

    Are you advocating a Revolutionary response to the Coup D’état of November 22, 1963, when our last Constitutional President, John F. Kennedy, was assassinated, along with the remnants of our Republic. Do you support a Restoration of our Republic, “by any means necessary” – as Malcolm X used to say?

    Are you saying that, either “free speech” (the essence of the 1st Amendment to our Constitution), be respected, or the people, our fellow citizens, should Rise?

    1. Committees of Correspondence

    2. Sons (and daughters) of Liberty (the founders of our New Republic)

    3. The Minutemen, and Minutewomen – to Lexington and Concord, and Beyond.

    May an angry majority be “force”d to take up arms? in America? Can they be forced to leave their TVs & computers, abandon their Zionist owned Dem & Rep political gangs, and bear arms-(in the cold weather)?

    You don’t like the Chinese Communist Party. Did they kill the Kennedys, butcher Vietnam, Iraq, the Dominican Republic, steal half of Mexico, all of Puerto Rico, help destroy the Palestinians, open chains of MacDonalds, or move the Dodgers out of Brooklyn?

    Are you Red Baiting the Imperialists? Do you host “Woke Intentions”?

    I’ll make a deal with you. First we Restore Our Republic, (with all its Bells and Whistles of Separation of Powers, and (almost) honest elections), and THEN we deal with Naom Chomsky and the Chinese Communists.

    • 回复: @Kevin Barrett
  4. @Durruti

    There are some wrong assumptions in this comment. I think the CCP is actually a relatively reasonable and competent bunch of mandarins, and I don’t expect them to base their society on the American Bill of Rights. The US, however, should respect its own Constitution.

    And I’m not advocating an armed uprising, just predicting one.

    But I agree with your final comment. I’ve been calling for ending the empire and restoring the Republic since I started reading Gore Vidal in high school.

    • 回复: @Durruti
    , @JWalters
  5. Durruti 说:
    @Kevin Barrett

    And I’m not advocating an armed uprising, just predicting one.

    I’m advocating one. After the bloody events of November 22, 1963, (and the horrors that followed), the assassins and their progeny will not peacefully return to us our country.

    Thanks for your response. I’m currently reading Vidal’s 帝国.

  6. anarchyst 说:

    There is a way to promote true “freedom of speech” on the social media platforms…
    Abolish section 230, which grants social media platforms total leeway in both regulating content, acting as a publisher, and allowing censorship. Presently, social media sites are not only immune from liability for statements made by their users, they also retain the ability to censor content they don’t like, quite often using “fact checkers” who themselves “don’t have a clue”. Presently, they “want it both ways” being a “publisher” when it suits them and being a “content carrier” for their users as well.
    The solution is to declare that any social media site with a 20% or greater market share be redefined as a “common carrier”, not unlike the phone companies. When was the last time you heard of a phone company censoring content?
    Since social media sites are today’s equivalent of the “公共广场” such social media site reclassification as “普通承运人” 完全有道理。

  7. Anon[159]• 免责声明 说:

    Reasonable comment. I like the phone company analogy.

  8. JWalters 说:

    Speaking of false flags, here’s an update on the amazingly thorough suppression of reporting on the Uvalde massacre, which really looks like a coverup operation.
    Uvalde Cops HARASS Journalists In Continued Coverup | Breaking Points with Krystal and Saagar

    It reminds me of the way the Establishment swooped in to cover up Jeffry Epstein’s crimes in his first Florida trial. Also the way the Establishment swooped in and covered up the autopsy report in the Robert F. Kennedy assassination. And the bombing of the King David Hotel. And the Lavon Affair. And of course that hugely terrifying “terrorist” attack on 9/11.

    Interesting fact – Benjamin Netanyahu’s 1995 book on terrorism envisioned a future war against terrorism both globally and domestically, “Fighting Terrorism: How Democracies Can Defeat Domestic and International Terrorists”.

  9. JWalters 说:
    @Kevin Barrett

    Is there a good source of information on the CCP’s reasonableness?

  10. Malla 说:

    There is no restoring the Republic as the demographics does not support that. The demographics has changed. Very few non Whites will understand and respect the ethos of the founding fathers of the USA. They will remain tribal/clannish because being tribal/clannish is part of their DNA. The ideas of the founding fathers will be rejected by their racial souls. And small minority of non Whites who will support the WASP ideas of the original founding fathers of the USA will be called “sellouts”, “Uncle Toms”, “traitors”, by the non White majorities.
    What will eventually happen is Balkanization + Brazillification. Balkanization entails tribe vs tribe and competition via various means (gang warfare, electoral voting blocks, mafiaso techniques) to hoard the common goods for their own tribe and thus a nepotistic, corrupt and third world future.
    Brazillification entails, small number of mafia elites living in rich guarded enclaves surrounded by crime infested favelas and slums. Followed by (Chavez like) Marxist revolutions resulting in further looting of the left over Middle classes by the Marxist mafia elites using the resentment, greed, jealousy and hatred of the lower classes as vehicles to power. The society will spiral more and more towards leftism and more poverty.

    • 同意: Justvisiting
  11. @JWalters

    Most available information suggests that the CCP has evolved and become relatively reasonable and pragmatic since the death of Mao. Their basic policies include: fostering a very successful mixed economy based on public banking; draconian anti-corruption inculcation and enforcement; making sure rich people aren’t above the law; investing heavily in infrastructure and economic growth as opposed to military spending; building an international sphere of influence through economic rather than military means; refraining from imposing their own ideology on other nations; etc.

    They’re even at the forefront of “ecological civilization”: https://www.unz.com/audio/kbarrett_john-cobb-and-andre-vltcheck-discuss-china-and-ecological-civilization/

    • 谢谢: JWalters
    • 回复: @mulga mumblebrain
  12. @Kevin Barrett

    The CPC is dedicated to ‘serving the people’, in contrast to the USA and ALL ‘capitalist democracies’ (the perfect oxymoron)which are dedicated to serving the rich owners of the economy, and of politics, business and the brainwashing systems, and ‘keeping the rabble in line’. The Chinese people, correctly in my opinion, see their Government as ‘democratic’ as it works FOR the people, not just the elites, and is OF and BY the people through the CPC, which anyone may join and ‘serve the people’.
    The success of China, despite unceasing US and other Western efforts at subversion and sabotage, in creating the greatest economic and human welfare leap in history, fills the Western Herrenvolk with undisguised genocidal rage.

当前评论者
说:

发表评论-对超过两周的文章发表评论,将在质量和语气上进行更严格的判断


 记得 我的信息为什么?
 电子邮件回复我的评论
$
提交的评论已被许可给 Unz评论 并可以由后者自行决定在其他地方重新发布
在翻译模式下禁用评论
通过RSS订阅此评论主题 通过RSS订阅所有Kevin Barrett评论