Unz评论•另类媒体选择
美国主流媒体大都排除了有趣,重要和有争议的观点
 博客浏览米歇尔·马尔金(Michelle Malkin)档案
嘿,《纽约时报》,请检查您的超链接
所有的错误归因都适合打印。
通过电子邮件将此页面发送给其他人

 记住我的信息



=>

书签 全部切换总目录添加到图书馆从图书馆中删除 • B显示评论下一个新评论下一个新回复了解更多
回复同意/不同意/等等 更多... 这个评论者 这个线程 隐藏线程 显示所有评论
同意不同意谢谢LOL轮唱
这些按钮可将您的公开协议,异议,感谢,LOL或巨魔与所选注释一起注册。 仅对最近使用“记住我的信息”复选框保存姓名和电子邮件的频繁评论者可用,并且在任何八个小时的时间内也只能使用三次。
忽略评论者 关注评论者
搜寻文字 区分大小写  确切的词  包括评论
列表 书签

Good morning, people. I’ve got your second snort-starter of the day.

上个月, the Left went nuts after I pointed out Bill Kristol’s honest error misattributing a quote from Michael Medved to me. Kristol’s detractors treated it like it was journalistic Armageddon.

那么, 纽约时报 did it again and printed another quote misattributed to me:

Michelle Malkin, the popular right-wing blogger, echoes the same sentiment and asks, “putting that aside for a moment, what is it that we’ve suddenly done to — finally — make her proud now? Allow her husband to enter a primary that he hasn’t even won yet?=

Hey, good quote! And they spelled my name correctly! Too bad I didn’t write it.

The NYT even included a hyperlink to the comments I supposedly made–a hyperlink which takes you to a post by Jeff Emanuel at 红州.

Jeff Emanuel at Redstate.com.

Michelle Malkin at MichelleMalkin.com.

Looking, looking for the similarity….

Nope, not seeing it.

It’s no biggie, of course. But go back and look at the 骚动 the nutroots raised over the Kristol misattribution (ear-splitting) vs. what they’ll say about this new misattribution (cricket-chirping).

Three words: Out of whack.

***

东部时间上午 9:44 更新. . They corrected their error.

(经作者或代表的许可从MichelleMalkin.com重新发布)
 
• 类别: 思想 •标签: “纽约时报”, 坚果根