Unz评论•另类媒体选择$
美国主流媒体大都排除了有趣,重要和有争议的观点
 博客浏览米歇尔·马尔金(Michelle Malkin)档案
隐藏、寻找、选择性泄漏:6 月 XNUMX 日更新 Anderson Tapes
通过电子邮件将此页面发送给其他人

 记住我的信息



=>

书签 全部切换总目录添加到图书馆从图书馆中删除 • B
显示评论下一个新评论下一个新回复查看我们的环境与可持续发展以及健康与安全公司政策
回复同意/不同意/等等 更多... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
同意不同意谢谢LOL轮唱
这些按钮可将您的公开协议,异议,感谢,LOL或巨魔与所选注释一起注册。 仅对最近使用“记住我的信息”复选框保存姓名和电子邮件的频繁评论者可用,并且在任何八个小时的时间内也只能使用三次。
忽略评论者 关注评论者
搜寻文字 区分大小写  确切的词  包括评论
列表 书签

两周前,我给大家介绍了一个案例 6 月 XNUMX 日国会集会被告约翰史蒂文安德森,其律师玛丽娜·梅德文(Marina Medvin)正在争取发布 30 秒的无罪国会监控视频剪辑,检察官不希望公众看到该剪辑。

媒体联盟的律师提交了一份新文件,该联盟也希望将视频公开。 律师们指出,联邦调查局同意在 6 月 XNUMX 日的另一起案件中发布来自国会大厦监控摄像头的四段视频剪辑——其中一个剪辑是由记者瑞安·赖利 (Ryan Reilly) 发布的:

正如新闻联盟律师 21 月 XNUMX 日的动议所指出的那样:

在莫斯案中发布的四个国会大厦监控视频片段描绘了通往美国国会大厦下西露台门的隧道中的活动。 参见政府的内存。 在补充。 12-17 岁的审前拘留,美国诉 Morss,Dkt。 80.

    根据被告安德森的说法,本案中有争议的视频片段描绘了在同一确切位置的活动。

见内存。 在补充。 Def 的口头 Mot。 从 CCTV 视频剪辑中删除“高度敏感”的名称 2,Dkt。 24. 事实上,此处讨论的视频片段描述了大约下午 2:53 在下西台地隧道发生的事件,参见同上,而来自 Morss 案例的图表 H 描述了发生的事件

    仅仅四分钟后

,大约在下午 2:57,请参阅政府的第三份增刊。 嗯。 在补充。 4 日审前拘留,美国诉 Morss,Dkt。 91(描述附件 H)。

这是同一隧道中的另一个剪辑,在其他情况下用作 DOJ 展览,由另一位记者发推文:

联邦调查局的荒谬和虚伪 “马赛克理论” 压制安德森视频的理由越来越明显。

释放安德森磁带!

***

[阅读补充权力的新闻联盟通知]

 
• 类别: 文化/社会 
隐藏26条评论发表评论
忽略评论者...跟随Endorsed Only
修剪评论?
  1. The Jan.6th “insurrection” is about as valid as Russian “collusion.”

    • 回复: @goldgettin
    @罗伯特·多兰

    What about Mueller?And the "summer of love","peaceful protesters",covid 19?
    Epstein,Weinstein,Smollet,Cosby,Corney,and my favorite Christine Blassy Ford?
    Maybe somebody should teach people to stop believing the media?g.Floyd real?NOT...

  2. @Robert Dolan
    The Jan.6th "insurrection" is about as valid as Russian "collusion."

    回复:@goldgettin

    What about Mueller?And the “summer of love”,”peaceful protesters”,covid 19?
    Epstein,Weinstein,Smollet,Cosby,Corney,and my favorite Christine Blassy Ford?
    Maybe somebody should teach people to stop believing the media?g.Floyd real?NOT…

  3. James Fields 和 Derek Chauvin 的表演审判是激进进步的政治化司法机构的工作。

    特朗普任命的保守派法官是否被边缘化了?

    一个不能举行公平选举的国家就会遭到一次罢工。
    一个没有新闻自由的国家有两次罢工。
    一个不平等适用其法律的国家正在第三次罢工。

  4. Ms Malkin is falling into the trap used by saavy defense lawyers to defeat many drug cases and many spy cases. The reality is that certain confidential information from sources, government cameras, and the like can never be released in full because it would compromise sources and methods used for collection of data. Plainly it would breach security to release ALL of the capital security video. That cannot be done. Security cleared defense lawyers who sign proper NDAs can see (and use) the video they need for court. Ms Malkin’s column is misleading. The trick used by drug dealer lawyers and by lawyers for spies for years was to blackmail the government with the treat to reveal sources or informants. Ms Malkin is acting like the lawyer for drug dealers acts. Give it up. There is no way on the planet that we want ALL of the security camera footage from the capital to be released to anyone.

    • 回复: @beavertales
    @哈里亨廷顿

    "There is no way on the planet that we want ALL of the security camera footage from the capital to be released to anyone."

    Ridiculous. It's not going to damage national security if people figure out there's a pinhole camera around the ceiling near the northeast corner of the rotunda.

    There are hours of video of people respecting the velvet ropes and interacting peacefully with Capitol security staff inside the building, and that's what the regime doesn't want in the historical record.

    该政权正试图控制信息以迫使其夸大其词的起义。

    回复:@Harry Huntington

    , @Achmed E. Newman
    @哈里亨廷顿

    I gave you some credit on some of your previous comments here, Harry, because I thought you were just a misguided cowardly lawyer. From this one, I see that you are a total anti-American bullshitter.

    You're not a very good liar after all. How'd you pass the bar?

    , @Hibernian
    @哈里亨廷顿

    Lavrenti Beria couldn't have said it any better.

  5. @Harry Huntington
    马尔金女士落入了狡猾的辩护律师用来挫败许多毒品案件和许多间谍案件的陷阱。 现实情况是,来自来源、政府相机等的某些机密信息永远无法完全发布,因为这会危及用于收集数据的来源和方法。 显然,发布所有资本安全视频将违反安全性。 那是做不到的。 签署适当保密协议的安全辩护律师可以看到(和使用)他们在法庭上需要的视频。 马尔金女士的专栏具有误导性。 毒贩律师和间谍律师多年来使用的伎俩是勒索政府以提供消息来源或线人。 马尔金女士的行为就像毒贩行为的律师。 放弃。 在这个星球上,我们不可能希望将来自首都的所有安全摄像头镜头发布给任何人。

    回复:@beavertales、@Achmed E. Newman、@Hibernian

    “在这个星球上,我们不可能希望将来自首都的所有安全摄像头镜头发布给任何人。”

    荒谬的。 如果人们发现圆形大厅东北角附近的天花板周围有一个针孔摄像头,这不会损害国家安全。

    有数小时的视频显示人们尊重天鹅绒绳索并与大楼内的国会大厦安保人员和平互动,这是该政权不希望出现在历史记录中的情况。

    该政权正试图控制信息以迫使其夸大其词的起义。

    • 回复: @Harry Huntington
    @beavertales

    您显然错了,并且对如何保护建筑物缺乏任何基本了解。 一个坏演员很想知道首都的安全摄像头到底显示了什么,这样他们就可以计划如果他们想进行一些邪恶的行为,如何避开摄像头。 因此,可能有很大一部分资本镜头永远不应该公开。 此外,镜头中可能有特工的面孔,他们正在努力防止政变,他们的掩护会因曝光而被炸毁。 有无限的可能性。 宣传形象的努力显然是为了破坏对恐怖分子和不良行为者的起诉。 在任何间谍活动或毒品审判中,试图迫使政府公开秘密并让政府放弃法律案件以避免泄露机密信息是标准的做法。 马尔金女士在这里被用来欺骗非常糟糕的演员。

    回复:@Hibernian,@animalogic

  6. 😂哈里亨廷顿先生就是我所说的胡说八道。

  7. Why is the Reply button missing on Malkin’s previous articles? I don’t read everything she writes 10 minutes after she writes it. Sorry, honey. Why you banning replies? This is extremely strange

    I’m going to form a march against Michellle Malkin: STOP BANNING REPLIES!!!! DOWN WITH MICHELLE!! MICHELLE, WTF????

    • 回复: @Achmed E. Newman
    @ restless94110

    It's not her fault, Restless. Maybe some bad internet down there in ole Mexico? ;-}

    (You can't [REPLY], per se, to the original author. Did you mean you saw no reply buttons to anyone else?)

    回复:@ restless94110

  8. There is no way on the planet that we want ALL of the security camera footage from the capital to be released to anyone.

    Who is ‘we’? Just pronoun referencing, don’cha know.

  9. @beavertales
    @哈里亨廷顿

    "There is no way on the planet that we want ALL of the security camera footage from the capital to be released to anyone."

    Ridiculous. It's not going to damage national security if people figure out there's a pinhole camera around the ceiling near the northeast corner of the rotunda.

    There are hours of video of people respecting the velvet ropes and interacting peacefully with Capitol security staff inside the building, and that's what the regime doesn't want in the historical record.

    该政权正试图控制信息以迫使其夸大其词的起义。

    回复:@Harry Huntington

    您显然错了,并且对如何保护建筑物缺乏任何基本了解。 一个坏演员很想知道首都的安全摄像头到底显示了什么,这样他们就可以计划如果他们想进行一些邪恶的行为,如何避开摄像头。 因此,可能有很大一部分资本镜头永远不应该公开。 此外,镜头中可能有特工的面孔,他们正在努力防止政变,他们的掩护会因曝光而被炸毁。 有无限的可能性。 宣传形象的努力显然是为了破坏对恐怖分子和不良行为者的起诉。 在任何间谍活动或毒品审判中,试图迫使政府公开秘密并让政府放弃法律案件以避免泄露机密信息是标准的做法。 马尔金女士在这里被用来欺骗非常糟糕的演员。

    • 巨魔: Achmed E. Newman
    • 回复: @Hibernian
    @哈里亨廷顿

    所以联邦调查局懒得不时重新安置摄像机?

    , @animalogic
    @哈里亨廷顿

    Your love & trust for the US government is, in today's world, near pathological.
    Your constant reference to drug & spying cases is hyperbole at its worst.
    Your concern for security in a case involving 30 sec's of video is ridiculous.
    You are an enemy of the people.

  10. @Harry Huntington
    马尔金女士落入了狡猾的辩护律师用来挫败许多毒品案件和许多间谍案件的陷阱。 现实情况是,来自来源、政府相机等的某些机密信息永远无法完全发布,因为这会危及用于收集数据的来源和方法。 显然,发布所有资本安全视频将违反安全性。 那是做不到的。 签署适当保密协议的安全辩护律师可以看到(和使用)他们在法庭上需要的视频。 马尔金女士的专栏具有误导性。 毒贩律师和间谍律师多年来使用的伎俩是勒索政府以提供消息来源或线人。 马尔金女士的行为就像毒贩行为的律师。 放弃。 在这个星球上,我们不可能希望将来自首都的所有安全摄像头镜头发布给任何人。

    回复:@beavertales、@Achmed E. Newman、@Hibernian

    I gave you some credit on some of your previous comments here, Harry, because I thought you were just a misguided cowardly lawyer. From this one, I see that you are a total anti-American bullshitter.

    You’re not a very good liar after all. How’d you pass the bar?

  11. @restless94110
    Why is the Reply button missing on Malkin's previous articles? I don't read everything she writes 10 minutes after she writes it. Sorry, honey. Why you banning replies? This is extremely strange

    I'm going to form a march against Michellle Malkin: STOP BANNING REPLIES!!!! DOWN WITH MICHELLE!! MICHELLE, WTF????

    回复:@Achmed E. Newman

    It’s not her fault, Restless. Maybe some bad internet down there in ole Mexico? ;-}

    (You can’t [REPLY], per se, to the original author. Did you mean you saw no reply buttons to anyone else?)

    • 回复: @restless94110
    @艾希迈德·纽曼(Achmed E.Newman)

    Hey Achmed. No, in ole Mejico we have fiber optic, high speed broadband for 50 bucks (including land line with unlimited calling to the US and Canada. Ole Mejico ain't hurting and either am I.

    I didn't really think it was Michelle's fault, but the Reply button is greyed out in the comment thread on her old article, but not on her newer article.

    But maybe you are making a point. I was attempting to reply to an original comment by a Trump-hater. He was replying to no one so it was an original comment. Are you telling me that I can't reply to that kind of a comment anywhere on Unz? That doesn't seem true but I haven't tested it. Why would that be done that way (by the rules of the comments on Unz?)?

    回复:@Achmed E. Newman

  12. Statist fucks like Huntington are the worst. I bet he can barely utter the words “innocent till proven guilty”. Those damn drug dealer attorneys always expecting their clients to given equal treatment under the law makes Harry gobsmacked. I saw that Harry spews all over the comment section of 美国Cuckservative probably hoping for that theocracy that will punish all the evil doers good and hard. The Constitution that puts the individual ahead of the collective needs to be repealed. Go back to your cuck friends, douchehole.

  13. @Achmed E. Newman
    @ restless94110

    It's not her fault, Restless. Maybe some bad internet down there in ole Mexico? ;-}

    (You can't [REPLY], per se, to the original author. Did you mean you saw no reply buttons to anyone else?)

    回复:@ restless94110

    Hey Achmed. No, in ole Mejico we have fiber optic, high speed broadband for 50 bucks (including land line with unlimited calling to the US and Canada. Ole Mejico ain’t hurting and either am I.

    I didn’t really think it was Michelle’s fault, but the Reply button is greyed out in the comment thread on her old article, but not on her newer article.

    But maybe you are making a point. I was attempting to reply to an original comment by a Trump-hater. He was replying to no one so it was an original comment. Are you telling me that I can’t reply to that kind of a comment anywhere on Unz? That doesn’t seem true but I haven’t tested it. Why would that be done that way (by the rules of the comments on Unz?)?

    • 回复: @Achmed E. Newman
    @ restless94110

    Hey, you got a better deal than we do, Restless.

    No, I'm not saying you shouldn't be able to reply to anyone's original comment. The "original author" would be Michelle Malkin (or Steve Sailer, Ron Pau, etc.) I had mistakenly thought you meant you couldn't reply to her, when you wrote "Why you banning replies?"

    I've seen the buttons greyed out before. If the article doesn't have "Comments Closed" on the bottom, then it's a bug - I've seen it before myself. It was just temporary, but either way, no fault of Michelle Malkin.

    .


    PS: The ultra-sensitive Paul Craig Roberts is the one here who usually doesn't allow comments, with a few exceptions. He got his panties in a wad when commenters like me called out his stupidity regarding the Global Climate Disruption™ a few years back. He had a temper tantrum and got Ron Unz to change things, or changed a setting, ,to have comments turned off. He's very very sensitive, we need to understand ...

    回复:@ restless94110

  14. @restless94110
    @艾希迈德·纽曼(Achmed E.Newman)

    Hey Achmed. No, in ole Mejico we have fiber optic, high speed broadband for 50 bucks (including land line with unlimited calling to the US and Canada. Ole Mejico ain't hurting and either am I.

    I didn't really think it was Michelle's fault, but the Reply button is greyed out in the comment thread on her old article, but not on her newer article.

    But maybe you are making a point. I was attempting to reply to an original comment by a Trump-hater. He was replying to no one so it was an original comment. Are you telling me that I can't reply to that kind of a comment anywhere on Unz? That doesn't seem true but I haven't tested it. Why would that be done that way (by the rules of the comments on Unz?)?

    回复:@Achmed E. Newman

    Hey, you got a better deal than we do, Restless.

    No, I’m not saying you shouldn’t be able to reply to anyone’s original comment. The “original author” would be Michelle Malkin (or Steve Sailer, Ron Pau, etc.) I had mistakenly thought you meant you couldn’t reply to her, when you wrote “Why you banning replies?”

    I’ve seen the buttons greyed out before. If the article doesn’t have “Comments Closed” on the bottom, then it’s a bug – I’ve seen it before myself. It was just temporary, but either way, no fault of Michelle Malkin.

    .

    PS: The ultra-sensitive Paul Craig Roberts is the one here who usually doesn’t allow comments, with a few exceptions. He got his panties in a wad when commenters like me called out his stupidity regarding the Global Climate Disruption™ a few years back. He had a temper tantrum and got Ron Unz to change things, or changed a setting, ,to have comments turned off. He’s very very sensitive, we need to understand …

    • 回复: @restless94110
    @艾希迈德·纽曼(Achmed E.Newman)

    On your PS, I think we are twins,. Paul closed comments after I kept calling him out on the Climate Change thing he got into a while back. And he must still be sore, because I've sent him several respectful suggestions and info on other topics over the last year or so and he will never reply.

    Notice also that after PCR did that? He stopped writing columns on Climate Change. In essence, we shook him into thinking about what he was writing,, but he didn't have the cajones to acknowledge our input. I've been reading him for 10 years or more and he has a good take on most things, but turning off the comments is dumb. Paul! You don't have to read them, just let people talk.

    As for Sailer, I gave up on him a few months ago after he kept on not letting my comments out of moderation one too many times. And this after a detailed private email exchange. Steve claimed that he had to moderate 100s of comments and he didn't want the n-word in there, then proved himself wrong and not up to the task by letting the n-word slip through practically daily. When I pointed that out to him, he wanted me to rat out some other commenter, and I had to remind him that I'm for n-word use and free speech not silly ineffective stupid moderation.

    The only other possible censoring I've seen on Unz is possibly Linh Dinh but only my last comment/reply to a climate alarmist troll after nearly 3 weeks of back and forth. Other writers that I have commented on always (knock on wood) let them through. As a free speech absolutist I find Unz Review refreshing, but Sailer needs to take a vacation from the onerous and silly moderation task he has set for himself, especially given his large daily output, and the amount of comments his stuff attracts. It's really a mystery to me why he goes through that task, but I've seen enough other people complaining about it to know it's not personal.

    Still, I lost respect for Sailer with this and I've stopped reading his stuff. There are plenty of other places to comment.

    Replies: @Cowboy, @Achmed E. Newman

  15. @Harry Huntington
    马尔金女士落入了狡猾的辩护律师用来挫败许多毒品案件和许多间谍案件的陷阱。 现实情况是,来自来源、政府相机等的某些机密信息永远无法完全发布,因为这会危及用于收集数据的来源和方法。 显然,发布所有资本安全视频将违反安全性。 那是做不到的。 签署适当保密协议的安全辩护律师可以看到(和使用)他们在法庭上需要的视频。 马尔金女士的专栏具有误导性。 毒贩律师和间谍律师多年来使用的伎俩是勒索政府以提供消息来源或线人。 马尔金女士的行为就像毒贩行为的律师。 放弃。 在这个星球上,我们不可能希望将来自首都的所有安全摄像头镜头发布给任何人。

    回复:@beavertales、@Achmed E. Newman、@Hibernian

    Lavrenti Beria 说得再好不过了。

    • 同意: Achmed E. Newman
  16. @Harry Huntington
    @beavertales

    您显然错了,并且对如何保护建筑物缺乏任何基本了解。 一个坏演员很想知道首都的安全摄像头到底显示了什么,这样他们就可以计划如果他们想进行一些邪恶的行为,如何避开摄像头。 因此,可能有很大一部分资本镜头永远不应该公开。 此外,镜头中可能有特工的面孔,他们正在努力防止政变,他们的掩护会因曝光而被炸毁。 有无限的可能性。 宣传形象的努力显然是为了破坏对恐怖分子和不良行为者的起诉。 在任何间谍活动或毒品审判中,试图迫使政府公开秘密并让政府放弃法律案件以避免泄露机密信息是标准的做法。 马尔金女士在这里被用来欺骗非常糟糕的演员。

    回复:@Hibernian,@animalogic

    所以联邦调查局懒得不时重新安置摄像机?

  17. 此外,镜头中可能有特工的面孔,他们正在努力防止政变,他们的掩护会因曝光而被炸毁。

    那里有超过一个或最多两个卧底特工的可能性很小。 这是一个半公共场所,在那里他们很容易被游客拍到。

  18. In the US, the most pernicious criminal gang inflicting the most harm on The People are prosecutors.

  19. @Achmed E. Newman
    @ restless94110

    Hey, you got a better deal than we do, Restless.

    No, I'm not saying you shouldn't be able to reply to anyone's original comment. The "original author" would be Michelle Malkin (or Steve Sailer, Ron Pau, etc.) I had mistakenly thought you meant you couldn't reply to her, when you wrote "Why you banning replies?"

    I've seen the buttons greyed out before. If the article doesn't have "Comments Closed" on the bottom, then it's a bug - I've seen it before myself. It was just temporary, but either way, no fault of Michelle Malkin.

    .


    PS: The ultra-sensitive Paul Craig Roberts is the one here who usually doesn't allow comments, with a few exceptions. He got his panties in a wad when commenters like me called out his stupidity regarding the Global Climate Disruption™ a few years back. He had a temper tantrum and got Ron Unz to change things, or changed a setting, ,to have comments turned off. He's very very sensitive, we need to understand ...

    回复:@ restless94110

    On your PS, I think we are twins,. Paul closed comments after I kept calling him out on the Climate Change thing he got into a while back. And he must still be sore, because I’ve sent him several respectful suggestions and info on other topics over the last year or so and he will never reply.

    Notice also that after PCR did that? He stopped writing columns on Climate Change. In essence, we shook him into thinking about what he was writing,, but he didn’t have the cajones to acknowledge our input. I’ve been reading him for 10 years or more and he has a good take on most things, but turning off the comments is dumb. Paul! You don’t have to read them, just let people talk.

    As for Sailer, I gave up on him a few months ago after he kept on not letting my comments out of moderation one too many times. And this after a detailed private email exchange. Steve claimed that he had to moderate 100s of comments and he didn’t want the n-word in there, then proved himself wrong and not up to the task by letting the n-word slip through practically daily. When I pointed that out to him, he wanted me to rat out some other commenter, and I had to remind him that I’m for n-word use and free speech not silly ineffective stupid moderation.

    The only other possible censoring I’ve seen on Unz is possibly Linh Dinh but only my last comment/reply to a climate alarmist troll after nearly 3 weeks of back and forth. Other writers that I have commented on always (knock on wood) let them through. As a free speech absolutist I find Unz Review refreshing, but Sailer needs to take a vacation from the onerous and silly moderation task he has set for himself, especially given his large daily output, and the amount of comments his stuff attracts. It’s really a mystery to me why he goes through that task, but I’ve seen enough other people complaining about it to know it’s not personal.

    Still, I lost respect for Sailer with this and I’ve stopped reading his stuff. There are plenty of other places to comment.

    • 回复: @Cowboy
    @ restless94110

    Sailer's law of self erotica? No thanks. Creepy.

    回复:@ restless94110

    , @Achmed E. Newman
    @ restless94110

    (Sorry to Mrs. Malkin about this off topic conversation.)

    Haha, I don't know if the deal with Mr. Roberts was a few years back, as it was at least 2 years ago when I and others called out his 全球气候愚蠢. The whole episode was hilarious, but, without comments, sorry, PCR, I'm not clicking.

    That's pretty interesting info, Restless about your email exchange with Mr. Sailer. I had figured that he was moderating them himself. When I used to have to wait for that, I got used to the fact that most times the comments wouldn't appear until his hours, which were obviously late hours even for a Loa Angeleno. It's a bunch of work, indeed. Could he have some script from Mr. Unz go through and find the one word, or whatever else, for him, if that is truly his only concern?

    I may disagree with Mr. Unz about 25% of the the time, but I deeply respect him for really keeping his site a free speech site, subject, of course, to those "whims" of his writers.

    PS: Paul Kersey will drop an occasional comment, so I quit commenting there for the 2nd time. However, I'm pretty sure he just doesn't like extraneous stuff, which, I admit that my comments were that last time.

    回复:@ restless94110

  20. We’ve spent WAY too much time responding to this Huntington idiot. I am remiss in having not yet thanked Mrs. Malkin for this and the previous column in support of the Political Prisoners taken after the Jan 6th protests.

    This story would have been kept buried had it not been for good people like Mrs. Malkin. 峰值愚蠢 发布了 Murderer of Ashli Babbitt revealed: Michael Leroy Byrd. How many people know the name Michael Leroy Byrd? He was on video shooting Mrs. Babbitt dead from a few feet away. He remains free. Yet good Americans have been sitting in jail for months for trespassing. That ought to get one to think on where America has come to…

  21. @restless94110
    @艾希迈德·纽曼(Achmed E.Newman)

    On your PS, I think we are twins,. Paul closed comments after I kept calling him out on the Climate Change thing he got into a while back. And he must still be sore, because I've sent him several respectful suggestions and info on other topics over the last year or so and he will never reply.

    Notice also that after PCR did that? He stopped writing columns on Climate Change. In essence, we shook him into thinking about what he was writing,, but he didn't have the cajones to acknowledge our input. I've been reading him for 10 years or more and he has a good take on most things, but turning off the comments is dumb. Paul! You don't have to read them, just let people talk.

    As for Sailer, I gave up on him a few months ago after he kept on not letting my comments out of moderation one too many times. And this after a detailed private email exchange. Steve claimed that he had to moderate 100s of comments and he didn't want the n-word in there, then proved himself wrong and not up to the task by letting the n-word slip through practically daily. When I pointed that out to him, he wanted me to rat out some other commenter, and I had to remind him that I'm for n-word use and free speech not silly ineffective stupid moderation.

    The only other possible censoring I've seen on Unz is possibly Linh Dinh but only my last comment/reply to a climate alarmist troll after nearly 3 weeks of back and forth. Other writers that I have commented on always (knock on wood) let them through. As a free speech absolutist I find Unz Review refreshing, but Sailer needs to take a vacation from the onerous and silly moderation task he has set for himself, especially given his large daily output, and the amount of comments his stuff attracts. It's really a mystery to me why he goes through that task, but I've seen enough other people complaining about it to know it's not personal.

    Still, I lost respect for Sailer with this and I've stopped reading his stuff. There are plenty of other places to comment.

    Replies: @Cowboy, @Achmed E. Newman

    Sailer’s law of self erotica? No thanks. Creepy.

    • 回复: @restless94110
    @牛仔

    What does self-erotica have to do with my comments or Steve Sailer?

  22. @Cowboy
    @ restless94110

    Sailer's law of self erotica? No thanks. Creepy.

    回复:@ restless94110

    What does self-erotica have to do with my comments or Steve Sailer?

  23. @restless94110
    @艾希迈德·纽曼(Achmed E.Newman)

    On your PS, I think we are twins,. Paul closed comments after I kept calling him out on the Climate Change thing he got into a while back. And he must still be sore, because I've sent him several respectful suggestions and info on other topics over the last year or so and he will never reply.

    Notice also that after PCR did that? He stopped writing columns on Climate Change. In essence, we shook him into thinking about what he was writing,, but he didn't have the cajones to acknowledge our input. I've been reading him for 10 years or more and he has a good take on most things, but turning off the comments is dumb. Paul! You don't have to read them, just let people talk.

    As for Sailer, I gave up on him a few months ago after he kept on not letting my comments out of moderation one too many times. And this after a detailed private email exchange. Steve claimed that he had to moderate 100s of comments and he didn't want the n-word in there, then proved himself wrong and not up to the task by letting the n-word slip through practically daily. When I pointed that out to him, he wanted me to rat out some other commenter, and I had to remind him that I'm for n-word use and free speech not silly ineffective stupid moderation.

    The only other possible censoring I've seen on Unz is possibly Linh Dinh but only my last comment/reply to a climate alarmist troll after nearly 3 weeks of back and forth. Other writers that I have commented on always (knock on wood) let them through. As a free speech absolutist I find Unz Review refreshing, but Sailer needs to take a vacation from the onerous and silly moderation task he has set for himself, especially given his large daily output, and the amount of comments his stuff attracts. It's really a mystery to me why he goes through that task, but I've seen enough other people complaining about it to know it's not personal.

    Still, I lost respect for Sailer with this and I've stopped reading his stuff. There are plenty of other places to comment.

    Replies: @Cowboy, @Achmed E. Newman

    (Sorry to Mrs. Malkin about this off topic conversation.)

    Haha, I don’t know if the deal with Mr. Roberts was a few years back, as it was at least 2 years ago when I and others called out his 全球气候愚蠢. The whole episode was hilarious, but, without comments, sorry, PCR, I’m not clicking.

    That’s pretty interesting info, Restless about your email exchange with Mr. Sailer. I had figured that he was moderating them himself. When I used to have to wait for that, I got used to the fact that most times the comments wouldn’t appear until his hours, which were obviously late hours even for a Loa Angeleno. It’s a bunch of work, indeed. Could he have some script from Mr. Unz go through and find the one word, or whatever else, for him, if that is truly his only concern?

    I may disagree with Mr. Unz about 25% of the the time, but I deeply respect him for really keeping his site a free speech site, subject, of course, to those “whims” of his writers.

    PS: Paul Kersey will drop an occasional comment, so I quit commenting there for the 2nd time. However, I’m pretty sure he just doesn’t like extraneous stuff, which, I admit that my comments were that last time.

    • 回复: @restless94110
    @艾希迈德·纽曼(Achmed E.Newman)

    (Hat tip to Michele for tolerating off topic)

    Yeah, we were among several who pointed out to PCR the error of his didactic thrust on Climate. I have had Feedly pull feeds from his columns from his own site so don't pay much attention to the copies on Unz.

    As for Steve, he indicated that it was he not someone else doing the moderation and I just lost interest in him after he just wouldn't stop. A few times re-posting worked, indicating he was so overwhelmed (another reason to stop with the stupid moderation crap), but then sure enough one or maybe two were never broken loose. I'm not going to spend time writing only to have some petty fool keep it from seeing the light of day. It impugns Sailer, his point of view, everything he writes.

    As for Kersey, I've had him not post one of mine maybe two, so I started "testing" him and he let the tests through. I just don't comment enough on his area to test, but it did have a chilling effect on my willingness to participate in his comment fields. I read him less and less anyway. Mostly just the headlines.

    Yea, kudos to Ron for letting the site pretty much run free. I don't see the point of any moderation at all no matter how weird it gets.

    Do you know? A few years ago, I read something about that Supreme Court Justice who made the famous ruling on Free Speech, what? a 100 years ago, about everything but yelling fire in a crowded theater. I read that several years later that Justice stated publicly that he regretted saying even that limitation. Prosecute the guy who yelled for inciting a panic/riot causing bodily harm, not for his speech. The Justice came to regret his edict, but it still is the go to quote of the anti-free speechers.

    Shouldn't be too hard to look up to find that story, should you care to.

  24. @Achmed E. Newman
    @ restless94110

    (Sorry to Mrs. Malkin about this off topic conversation.)

    Haha, I don't know if the deal with Mr. Roberts was a few years back, as it was at least 2 years ago when I and others called out his 全球气候愚蠢. The whole episode was hilarious, but, without comments, sorry, PCR, I'm not clicking.

    That's pretty interesting info, Restless about your email exchange with Mr. Sailer. I had figured that he was moderating them himself. When I used to have to wait for that, I got used to the fact that most times the comments wouldn't appear until his hours, which were obviously late hours even for a Loa Angeleno. It's a bunch of work, indeed. Could he have some script from Mr. Unz go through and find the one word, or whatever else, for him, if that is truly his only concern?

    I may disagree with Mr. Unz about 25% of the the time, but I deeply respect him for really keeping his site a free speech site, subject, of course, to those "whims" of his writers.

    PS: Paul Kersey will drop an occasional comment, so I quit commenting there for the 2nd time. However, I'm pretty sure he just doesn't like extraneous stuff, which, I admit that my comments were that last time.

    回复:@ restless94110

    (Hat tip to Michele for tolerating off topic)

    Yeah, we were among several who pointed out to PCR the error of his didactic thrust on Climate. I have had Feedly pull feeds from his columns from his own site so don’t pay much attention to the copies on Unz.

    As for Steve, he indicated that it was he not someone else doing the moderation and I just lost interest in him after he just wouldn’t stop. A few times re-posting worked, indicating he was so overwhelmed (another reason to stop with the stupid moderation crap), but then sure enough one or maybe two were never broken loose. I’m not going to spend time writing only to have some petty fool keep it from seeing the light of day. It impugns Sailer, his point of view, everything he writes.

    As for Kersey, I’ve had him not post one of mine maybe two, so I started “testing” him and he let the tests through. I just don’t comment enough on his area to test, but it did have a chilling effect on my willingness to participate in his comment fields. I read him less and less anyway. Mostly just the headlines.

    Yea, kudos to Ron for letting the site pretty much run free. I don’t see the point of any moderation at all no matter how weird it gets.

    Do you know? A few years ago, I read something about that Supreme Court Justice who made the famous ruling on Free Speech, what? a 100 years ago, about everything but yelling fire in a crowded theater. I read that several years later that Justice stated publicly that he regretted saying even that limitation. Prosecute the guy who yelled for inciting a panic/riot causing bodily harm, not for his speech. The Justice came to regret his edict, but it still is the go to quote of the anti-free speechers.

    Shouldn’t be too hard to look up to find that story, should you care to.

  25. @Harry Huntington
    @beavertales

    您显然错了,并且对如何保护建筑物缺乏任何基本了解。 一个坏演员很想知道首都的安全摄像头到底显示了什么,这样他们就可以计划如果他们想进行一些邪恶的行为,如何避开摄像头。 因此,可能有很大一部分资本镜头永远不应该公开。 此外,镜头中可能有特工的面孔,他们正在努力防止政变,他们的掩护会因曝光而被炸毁。 有无限的可能性。 宣传形象的努力显然是为了破坏对恐怖分子和不良行为者的起诉。 在任何间谍活动或毒品审判中,试图迫使政府公开秘密并让政府放弃法律案件以避免泄露机密信息是标准的做法。 马尔金女士在这里被用来欺骗非常糟糕的演员。

    回复:@Hibernian,@animalogic

    Your love & trust for the US government is, in today’s world, near pathological.
    Your constant reference to drug & spying cases is hyperbole at its worst.
    Your concern for security in a case involving 30 sec’s of video is ridiculous.
    You are an enemy of the people.

    • 同意: Achmed E. Newman, Adam Smith
  26. 啊,光的尽头有隧道。

    • 同意: Hibernian

评论被关闭。

通过RSS订阅所有Michelle Malkin的评论