Unz评论•另类媒体选择$
美国主流媒体大都排除了有趣,重要和有争议的观点
 博客浏览迈克·惠特尼(Mike Whitney)档案
Scott Ritter 的 Switcheroo:“为什么我从根本上改变了我的整体评估”

书签 全部切换总目录添加到图书馆从图书馆中删除 • B
显示评论下一个新评论下一个新回复了解更多
回复同意/不同意/等等 更多... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
同意不同意谢谢LOL轮唱
这些按钮可将您的公开协议,异议,感谢,LOL或巨魔与所选注释一起注册。 仅对最近使用“记住我的信息”复选框保存姓名和电子邮件的频繁评论者可用,并且在任何八个小时的时间内也只能使用三次。
忽略评论者 关注评论者
搜寻文字 区分大小写  确切的词  包括评论
列表 书签

周日,外交政策博客上充斥着斯科特·里特(Scott Ritter)“对战争的评估发生了翻天覆地的变化”的消息。 这位前海军陆战队员似乎已经检查了乌克兰最近的事态发展,并得出结论认为俄罗斯要赢得胜利比他最初想象的要困难得多。

自然,里特逆转的消息在整个互联网上引起了震动,尤其是在密切关注乌克兰事件的人们中,他们非常钦佩他的公正分析。 其中一些人显然感到被里特的言论出卖了,并抨击他为“关注巨魔”,指的是一个假装同情但实际上却感觉相反的人。 对于一个花费大量时间来告知人们一个如果没有他的研究他们可能知之甚少的问题的人,这是一种糟糕的方式。 此外,里特不是伪君子。 恰恰相反。

然而,公平地说,里特可能是“俄罗斯正在获胜”理论的最直言不讳的支持者,这一假设与我们在传统媒体上看到的或在有线新闻频道上看到的一切背道而驰。 不幸的是,里特对此事的看法发生了巨大变化,这几乎完全是由于当地的事态发展。 正如里特坦率承认的那样, “西方向乌克兰提供的军事援助正在改变局势,如果俄罗斯找不到有意义的解决方法……冲突将永远不会结束。”

这与他几周前发表的“俄罗斯正在赢得这场战争,并且是决定性地赢得战争”的声明相比有了很大的转变。

那么,发生了什么变化? 导致里特变脸的所谓发展是什么?

以下是引发争吵的采访摘录。 Ritter 加入了 Ray McGovern 和主持人 Garland Nixon 周六早间直播. (引用是从视频中复制的。我接受任何错误的责任。)

斯科特里特 (从 47:50 分开始)——“让我感到沮丧的事情是…… 我的评估是,乌克兰很难吸收这种新设备和新材料 (材料——最近运往乌克兰的额外致命武器) 但是榴弹炮已经对俄罗斯进行了攻击。 (而且)他们正在哈尔科夫地区产生影响。 不是全部 90 个,但它们有几个正在使用的电池。

这是怎么回事呢?

这就是为什么我从根本上改变了我的总体评估,因为我一直在假设俄罗斯能够拦截绝大多数此类设备,但俄罗斯已经证明自己无法或不愿意这样做,并且 - 结果 -乌克兰人正在战场上产生有意义的影响。 不是在主要竞争地区,如顿巴斯,而是在外围。 这就是俄罗斯在哈尔科夫以北进行战术性撤军的原因,因为为了匹配乌克兰的最佳能力,俄罗斯将不得不从俄罗斯决定不做的主要努力中转移资源。 所以,他们正在重新配置战场。 (交易不同地区的土地)……(“周六早上与斯科特·里特和雷·麦戈文一起直播, YouTube)

所以,虽然里特的同情心丝毫没有改变,但很明显他的分析已经改变了。 起初,他并不认为致命武器的泛滥会影响战争的结果。 现在他不太确定了。 这是一个诚实的错误,但他仍然需要“坦白”并解释导致他掉头的因素。 以下是同一次采访的更多内容:

斯科特·里特——这是战争中的一个变革时刻,因为这意味着非军事化没有发生。 对于俄罗斯在东方摧毁的所有力量, 乌克兰正在重建重要的能力 (在西方)我把这比作 1941 年 XNUMX 月的莫斯科,当时德国人正在向莫斯科进发,而俄罗斯人刚刚开始向他们扔东西,牺牲一切来减缓德国的进攻。 直到温特将军和西伯利亚师的联合让他们有了反击的能力。 德军被打得脸都白了,他们被拦住并转身回去。 如果俄罗斯不改变计算,那么这就是我们前进的轨迹。 因为 200,000 名士兵——无论他们多么有能力,都只能做这么多。 而现在正在发生的战斗——即使它正在屠杀乌克兰人——对俄罗斯人来说也不是免费的。 他们正在失去设备,正在失去人员,正在失去物资,除非普京动员或转移部队,否则这些都不会被替换。 因此,俄罗斯可能有 200,000 人,而不是 180,000 人在线。 如果你不认为移除 20,000 人不会改变俄罗斯领导层的选择,那么你对战争一无所知。”

所以,我相信俄罗斯会在东部获胜,正如我们所说,他们正在碾压他们,正在屠杀他们; 乌克兰人遭受的死亡和破坏的数量是难以想象的,但我相信 乌克兰人愿意承担这些损失,以争取时间重组一支将挑战俄罗斯的军队 计划 除非俄罗斯愿意越过第聂伯河进入乌克兰西部,在那里它可以消除乌克兰人从俄罗斯人那里获得的战略深度,否则乌克兰的非军事化将不会发生。 当数百亿美元的设备涌入而俄罗斯无法阻止时,它就不可能发生。 这些先进的榴弹炮现在正在前线作战,这表明俄罗斯的方法有问题。 而且——除非他们改变这种方法——我认为我们将迎来一个非常漫长的夏天。“(”周六早上与斯科特·里特和雷·麦戈文一起直播, YouTube)

很难理解里特在这里说什么。 他真的是在建议普京将当前的“特种作战”扩大为一场全面的世界大战吗? 有一次,他漫不经心地认为俄罗斯必须动员 1 万人(注:俄罗斯目前在乌克兰只有 200,000 人),如果他们想在乌克兰取得胜利,然后转移到芬兰。 里特的语气无法判断他是否只是在客观地观察“需要什么”才能取得成功,或者他是否提出了他认为俄罗斯最高统帅部应该考虑的明确建议。 我无法回答。 以下是采访的更多内容:

斯科特里特(5:20 分)– “认为乌克兰军队作为一支有效的战斗力量已经被淘汰的想法是一个有缺陷的概念,除非俄罗斯扩大其特殊军事行动——可能到将其从特殊军事行动转变为一场包括全部乌克兰人在内的战争的地步。战斗空间——(那么)这是一场危险的冲突,俄罗斯几乎无法取胜 这意味着,虽然他们可以用 200,000 万军队完成他们在东部的目标,但在北约向乌克兰提供数百亿美元的装备时,他们无法阻止乌克兰重新武装和重新装备——每当你为敌人提供重建军事能力的“安全空间”时,你永远不会获胜。 ......

是的,俄罗斯正在东方取胜,这就是他们所说的他们一直以来的目标。 他们正在实现这一点。 那就是特殊的军事行动。 但 现在我们谈论的是“战争”,我认为俄罗斯还没有实现这种转变。 这是西方和俄罗斯之间事实上的代理人战争,使用乌克兰军队作为北约的利剑。 这样做的目的是“让俄罗斯流血”。 如果俄罗斯不改变现状,俄罗斯将流血不止。” 泽伦斯基表示,他愿意动员一百万人,而此时西方已准备好提供资金和设备,将这百万人变成真正的军事威胁。

所以,我明白了 过去几周发生的事情具有决定性意义。

西方提供的军事援助正在改变局势,如果俄罗斯不能找到有意义的方式解决这个问题,并将其作为一种军事能力加以消除……那么冲突将永远不会结束。” (“周六早上与斯科特·里特和雷·麦戈文一起直播, YouTube)

它来自马的嘴。 读者将不得不得出自己的结论。

恕我直言,斯科特·里特正在逐渐适应这样的想法,即乌克兰的冲突不仅仅是两个争吵的邻国之间的区域性冲突,也不是北约和俄罗斯之间的代理人战争。 不。乌克兰是更广泛计划的第一阶段,该计划旨在粉碎俄罗斯、崩溃其经济、罢免其领导人、夺取其自然资源、分裂其领土,以及将美国力量从中亚投射到环太平洋地区。 乌克兰是关于霸权、帝国和纯粹的、纯粹的力量。 最重要的是,乌克兰是第三次世界大战中的第一场战役,这场战争由华盛顿炮制并发动,以确保美国在另一个不受挑战的世纪占据主导地位。

 
• 类别: 对外政策 •标签: 美国军事, 北约, 俄罗斯, 乌克兰 
隐藏762条评论发表评论
忽略评论者...跟随Endorsed Only
修剪评论?
    []
  1. anonymous[139]• 免责声明 说:

    泽连斯基表示他愿意动员一百万人,

    是的,他愿意,但是泽连斯基提议的那百万人愿意动员起来吗?他们愿意为泽连斯基政权牺牲多少?年长者和高中生什么时候被征召入伍?

  2. you 说:

    与批评斯科特的人相反,我认为能够认识到普京计划的某些方面进展不顺利并对此提出警告是诚实的表现。
    但我认为斯科特作为一名军人错过了这场“战争”的一个重要方面:它对能源价格(甚至能源短缺)的影响,以及这些对西方国家经济的影响。
    我完全同意斯科特关于新的数百亿美元武器对俄罗斯计划所带来的风险的看法,因为它使非军事化变得更加困难,因此实现了目标,但我们可以看到已经脆弱的西方经济体,通货膨胀和开始出现能源和食品短缺,他们的证券交易所下跌,加密货币下跌,所有这些都表明他们的经济正在下滑。 因此它将在西方国家造成越来越多的动荡,他们将不得不做出一些选择,例如继续向乌克兰提供免费武器或帮助其人民在下一个冬天不冻死,并能够养活自己。
    此外,乌克兰似乎有一些燃料问题,我不确定斯科特是否在他的评估中包括这一点:例如,基辅只剩下 3 天的燃料,这对俄罗斯来说非常好,因为所有漂亮的全新武器都是由韦斯特需要燃料(或柴油)才能工作。 因此,俄罗斯应该集中精力摧毁燃料库和燃料供应,她不必担心那数百亿的新武器,因为没有燃料它们将无法移动太多。

  3. 由于几个原因,我在几周前改变了与 Ritter 类似的观点。 主要问题是前线缺乏运动。 俄罗斯人向全世界讲述了他们的“第二阶段”,然后一个月没有任何实际收益。 这不是你赢得战争的方式。 第二个原因是 Igor Strelkov 的分析。 这让我觉得很有道理。 我知道他是个悲观主义者,以前也犯过错; 但他现在可能是正确的。

    总的来说,对我来说它看起来像这样:
    – 克里姆林宫认为乌克兰会在 2014 年像克里米亚一样倒闭。虽然这可能会让莫斯科在 2014 年入侵,但现在不可能在 2022 年发生,因为纳粹和英裔美国人有 8 年的时间来建立一支合适的军队。 因此,俄罗斯人通过削弱他们的进攻力量并拉开他们的拳头来破坏战术惊喜的优势。
    - 除了高层有问题的领导,这是一个大问题,俄罗斯人还有其他一些弱点。 从战术上讲,他们没有适应时代的战争,也缺乏无人机。 从战略上讲,虽然在纸面上他们有 1 万身着制服的人,但陆军只有 280 万人(sukhoputnye voiskа)。 这与乌克兰人相当。 俄罗斯人面临的第三个问题是乌克兰人在过去 8 年里一直在顿巴斯挖坑。
    – 在第一阶段花费了一个月后,莫斯科决定进行一次壮观的撤军,并将部队集中在顿巴斯。 现在,顿巴斯的行动看起来很像二战中的堡垒行动。 即库尔斯克。 我以为俄罗斯人知道他们在做什么。 但现在我认为他们的最高统帅又犯错了。 他们又浪费了一个月的时间来攻打要塞。

    我认为俄罗斯在这场战争中拥有道德制高点,而基辅政权是纳粹可憎的。 但就当地局势而言,乌克兰和北约的表现要好于俄罗斯。 莫斯科需要动员起来,建立从中国获得补给的渠道,并在高层做出改变。

  4. 就像 USA/NAZO 告诉他们的那样,Ukies 将 Howies 放在幼儿园和学前班。 在与真正重视人类生命的国家打交道时(与美国/英国/北约/欧盟的领导层不同),平民盾牌会起作用。

    假设里特的分析准确无误,俄罗斯需要做出决定:保护乌克兰平民还是赢得战争。 艰难的选择。 难以置信的艰难选择。 特别是对于真正走路的东正教基督徒。 很难调和战争和真正的基督教伦理/价值观。 事实上,不可能。 (当然,除非你是一个崇拜“兰博耶稣”的美国人。)

    我肯定不想打那个电话。

    但重要的是要记住:“……罢免(俄罗斯)领导人,掠夺其自然资源,分裂其领土……”,意味着摧毁俄罗斯。 弗拉德很清楚:“我们为什么要一个没有俄罗斯的世界?”

    (萨尔马特女士和波塞冬女士耐心地等待着……)

  5. Richard B 说:

    最重要的是,乌克兰是第三次世界大战中的第一场战役,这场战争是华盛顿精心策划和发动的,目的是确保美国在另一个世纪里不受挑战。

    美国至上 = 犹太至上公司 (JSI)

    恕我直言,斯科特·里特正在逐渐适应这样一种观念:乌克兰冲突不仅仅是两个争吵邻国之间的地区冲突,也不是北约和俄罗斯之间的代理人战争。不。乌克兰是一项更广泛计划的第一阶段,该计划旨在压垮俄罗斯、摧毁其经济、推翻其领导人、夺取其自然资源、分裂其领土,并将美国的力量穿过中亚投射到环太平洋地区。乌克兰是霸权、帝国和纯粹的权力的象征。

    你也许是对的。但他们在美国国内对白人做同样的事情。白人、俄罗斯人和巴勒斯坦人几乎都在同一个篮子里 全球替罪羊.

    如果没有替罪羊,JSI 就根本无法运作。这就是为什么他们一开始就创造了替罪羊。没有替罪羊的生存对他们来说是不可想象的。这就是他们会失败的原因。或者,充其量只能取得一场代价高昂的胜利。一样。

    你是对的。它关乎权力,“纯粹的、纯粹的权力”。或者,全谱优势。

    事实上,JSI试图建立一种不受控制、以武力维持的社会秩序,只会增加不受控制的赤裸裸权力(为了权力而权力,而不是为了有效的社会管理)的行使。正是这种不断施加的力量正在迅速破坏他们权力控制的社会制度。看看周围吧。

    事实是,你根本无法依靠持续不断的宣传、审查、胁迫和武力来管理一个比人类历史上任何时候都更加复杂和不可预测的文明。一定有一个思想因素。但他们正在消除这一点。只要看一眼我们的大学,这个令人不快的事实就显而易见了。

    这就是为什么 JSI 是人类真正的毒瘤,为什么背叛他们就是对人类的忠诚。不管怎样,他们不仅会失败,而且正在失败。他们只是不知道而已。但这并不奇怪,因为精神病性的傲慢和自我意识并不相伴。

  6. meamjojo 说:

    “而且——除非他们改变这种方法——我认为我们将迎来一个非常漫长的夏天。”

    不见得。 普京似乎在临终前和/或将被政变推翻。 然后,聪明的钱会打赌,他会被一个更愿意承认俄罗斯想象力的局限性(很多核武器并不意味着布普基斯)的人取代,承诺与西方合作并承诺为重建俄罗斯付出代价乌克兰以取消严厉的制裁。
    ---
    普京“病得很重”; 处于“非常糟糕”的身体和心理状态:乌克兰军事首长
    05 年 15 月 22 日晚上 9 点 31 分

    关键点
    – 一场政变可能会推翻据称身患重病的普京
    – 一位俄罗斯寡头说,普京在 XNUMX 月接受了背部疼痛手术
    – 在与白俄罗斯领导人卢卡申科会面时,他似乎手脚颤抖,有关普京健康状况的猜测重新浮出水面
    ....
    https://www.ibtimes.com/putin-very-sick-very-bad-physical-psychological-state-ukraine-military-chief-3508008

  7. meamjojo 说:

    恕我直言,斯科特·里特正在逐渐适应这样的想法,即乌克兰的冲突不仅仅是两个争吵的邻国之间的区域性冲突,也不是北约和俄罗斯之间的代理人战争。 不。乌克兰是更广泛计划的第一阶段,该计划旨在粉碎俄罗斯、崩溃其经济、罢免其领导人、夺取其自然资源、分裂其领土,以及将美国力量从中亚投射到环太平洋地区。 乌克兰是关于霸权、帝国和纯粹的、纯粹的力量。 最重要的是,乌克兰是第三次世界大战中的第一场战役,这场战争由华盛顿炮制并发动,以确保美国在另一个不受挑战的世纪占据主导地位。

    是的先生。搞砸最好的,你就会和其他人一起堕落,Puuty。
    ----
    普京失败后,俄罗斯人“感到羞愧”,因为他们不得不“众筹”购买军用无人机
    俄罗斯官方媒体电视主持人抱怨称,其海关政策阻碍其军队获得军事装备,称其为“令人痛心的耻辱”。

    14年2022月XNUMX日,星期六

    在一场激烈的交锋中,一位俄罗斯电视主持人和一位政治家对乌克兰军队在邻国冲突中装备更精良的“愚蠢举动”表示哀叹。俄罗斯联邦议会议员谢苗·巴格达萨罗夫声称,俄罗斯需要“转向战时方式”,以防止其军队在武器装备上处于劣势,因为普京的军队在入侵乌克兰的过程中仍在努力取得进展。

    电视主持人弗拉基米尔·索洛维约夫说:“他们在前线告诉我们:给我们无人机!人们正在疯狂地筹集大量资金。

    “他们买下了所有可用的东西。为什么这种垃圾不能在俄罗斯大量生产?”

    国家杜姆议员巴格达萨罗夫先生回答说:“每个人都羞于谈论此事。

    “志愿者,就像我们共同的熟人一样,正在购买所有东西并将其运送到那里。真是让人哭笑不得啊!”

    巴格达萨罗夫对乌克兰获得更多武器的前景感到越来越愤怒,他补充道:“这个国家需要转向战时方针。这些愚蠢的滑稽动作已经够了。”
    ....
    https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/1607572/Russia-State-Media-TV-Vladimir-Putin-weapons-supplies-shortage-vn

    • 巨魔: Incisive One, ariadna, Lurker
    • 回复: @Truth Vigilante
    , @profnasty
  8. j2 说:

    像斯科特·里特这样的亲俄分析人士迫于现实的压力而改变战争预测是适当的,但他的分析仍然远远不够正确。战争不会永远持续下去,也不会持续几年,乌克兰也不会同意停火,因为这只会给俄罗斯时间重建军队。

    乌克兰已经开始动员 100 万人,三个月后,最迟在 8 月中旬,这支部队将具备充足的装备。出于内部政治原因,俄罗斯不太可能进行全面动员,即使可以,它也不能派出超过一百万缺乏积极性的人来对抗乌克兰人。不会超过100万,因为俄罗斯必须保持国土防御能力。这些人的积极性很低,因为他们的任务是解决俄罗斯军队用合同兵在国外发动的侵略战争,而这些合同兵输掉了战争。为什么预备役军人要去修理它?如果俄罗斯受到攻击那就不一样了,但北约并没有攻击俄罗斯,也无意让俄罗斯流血。无非是想消除俄罗斯侵略邻国的意愿和实力。

    但我怀疑战争的转折点会在八月中旬之前。打破对哈尔科夫的部分围困是乌克兰明显且必要的初步举措。合乎逻辑的延续是从哈尔科夫东部到伊齐乌姆的前线进行反攻。此后是赫尔松县的反攻。我们将拭目以待它们何时能够实现,但到目前为止,乌克兰只是按照领土防御教科书进行了防御。

    乌克兰战争的现实非常简单:乌克兰不会因为幅员太大而耗尽人力,也不会因为乌克兰在需要时得到西方的帮助而耗尽武器。目前乌克兰有超过300,000万的军队和地方军队。大约三个月后,这支部队将增至200,000万人。俄罗斯原本有150,000万士兵,其中120万去了乌克兰。陆军主要由125-97辆BTG组成。目前俄罗斯拥有80,000架BTG,但其战斗价值较小,因为许多BTG的人员和装备都减少了,而且替换原来合同兵的人员也没有接受过这项任务的训练。俄罗斯只有c。八十万大军对抗这三十万大军。它仍然具有一些技术优势,但随着战争继续,乌克兰变得更强而俄罗斯变得更弱,这种优势正在减弱。

    亲俄分析人士只有一个希望:俄罗斯将在六月初发动大规模进攻。也许它会尝试,但没有理由认为它会成功。另一个希望是,这将是一场没有尽头的长期战争,而俄罗斯将设法保住已经得到的东西。这也是不太可能的。乌克兰将在未来一段时间内发动反攻,但可能不是在遥远的将来。

    斯科特·里特真的相信导弹袭击可以阻止西方武器援助或者乌克兰人无法学会使用它们的想法是荒谬的:它们只能减慢运输并摧毁一些运输工具,但从一开始就很明显有足够的武器会通过到了前线,这些武器的训练时间并不长。俄罗斯飞机大多从俄罗斯领空向乌克兰发射导弹而不是提供近距离空中支援也就不足为奇了,因为乌克兰防空导致俄罗斯飞机的损失相当高。在当前的军事形势下,俄罗斯失去空中优势意义重大,因为它消除了乌克兰所面临的一项障碍。

    斯科特·里特“180度大转弯”的重要性或许在于,它反映出俄罗斯军方对这场战争不再满意。这对普京的帮派意味着什么,我们拭目以待。

    • 不同意: Mikhail
    • 谢谢: Pixo
  9. 转到阿拉巴马州的月亮网站并查看周日的乌克兰主题。

    我阐述了里特的所有假设并证明它们是完全错误的。

    我对他如何完成 180 分感到困惑,并引用了他自己在过去两个月中反复解雇的原因。

    我怀疑斯科特对战争的节奏感到沮丧,尽管俄罗斯没有设定执行战争的时间表,而且我还怀疑他受到了俄罗斯各种战术失败的影响,例如最近的浮桥穿越。其他人怀疑他受到的影响类似于他参与伊拉克检查惨败以及后来的法律问题后受到联邦调查局骚扰的方式,但我不知道这些怀疑是否有道理。

    更糟糕的是,他关于乌克兰站百万军队的想法只是乌克兰本身的宣传废话,我很难理解他为什么要认真对待这一点。

    居住在美国的俄罗斯公民安德烈·马尔蒂亚诺夫(Andrei Maryanov)被称为军事分析家,并就此主题撰写了三本书,他已经在他的博客上驳回了斯科特的担忧。

    由于斯科特之前的正确评估,我不认为斯科特是“关注巨魔”。我简直不明白像他这样聪明的人怎么能完全误解实地事件到这种程度。

  10. Wokechoke 说:

    是的,我认为爱德华·勒特瓦克注意到了这一点。
    依稀。

    战略研究的高层头脑惊恐地意识到,RU 的崩溃将导致几个可怕的后果。

  11. Biff 说:

    没有出口匝道

    一些混蛋

  12. BlackC 说:

    目前的“特别军事行动”是在传统上属于俄罗斯、俄罗斯人口比例较高的地区进行,俄罗斯军队实际上相当克制,小心翼翼地尽量减少对平民、基础设施等的损害。

    在我看来,如果战斗需要扩大到传统上不属于俄罗斯也没有俄罗斯人民居住的乌克兰西部,军事行动也将受到同样的限制,这种想法是相当不现实的。如果发生这种情况,我怀疑手套会脱落。

    • 同意: michael888
    • 回复: @michael888
  13. IronForge 说:

    作者及成员:

    根据里特的维基百科页面,他声称自己为军情六处的项目工作。

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_Ritter

    他也是一名多次被捕的性犯罪者——因涉及“非法接触未成年人”等行为而被定罪+监禁。

    他在监狱里度过了自己的时光。

    他与军情六处的合作和“监狱期限”使他在我的书中“妥协”。当涉及到俄罗斯、印度或中国时,军情六处永远不可信;并且可以向 Ritter 提供他们的英特尔叙述。

    他是海军陆战队情报类型;但他不在英国——走私可能让他感到害怕;但他似乎与俄罗斯的目标不同步。

    俄罗斯拥有空中优势。俄罗斯的首要任务是保护俄语地区免受基辅利沃夫/班德拉纳粹的侵害。俄罗斯可能在很大程度上依靠防区外武器来打击基辅-利沃夫上空的目标。一些装备可能会通过卡车走私进来;但火车运行得不太好。

    卡车运输车队和单独的拖车走私者最终将被发现并添加到目标列表中。控制空域的好处之一。

    我曾在一艘导弹巡洋舰上担任护航战区的空战协调员。

    如果敖德萨+其他俄语地区被俄罗斯+分离主义者占领(看起来合乎逻辑),基辅-利沃夫“尾部”应该设立专门的“禁飞区”和更具侵略性的炮兵/导弹/无人机打击演习+出动,因为基辅-利沃夫不会被俄罗斯+分离主义者占领(很长时间)或重建。

    也许里特不太理解以精确打击武器为重点的特别军事行动的概念,以保护平民生命+基础设施,同时取消英国皇家军事+后勤计划。需要时间;俄罗斯宁愿给英国军队+义务兵投降的机会。

    里特呼吁发动一场占领西部地区的“战争”,这符合军情六处和美国国家+国防部对俄罗斯流血的计划。

    抱歉。

    他是军情六处的一名资产——受到了损害。

    至于他的性犯罪+监禁,我必须声明,我不赞成里特在那里的行为。

    如果我经营一家 PMC,我会雇用 Ritter 吗?绝不。

    • 谢谢: Iris
  14. northeast 说:

    自二战以来,美国没有赢得过一场战争。 它不会很快接管世界。

  15. Anon[828]• 免责声明 说:

    根据他的历史,你会认为他很容易被情报机构控制,也许这就是这里发生的事情? https://www.foxnews.com/us/former-u-n-weapons-inspector-gets-prison-in-internet-sex-act-case

    • 回复: @Kratoklastes
  16. 惠特尼,

    你一直是个顽皮的记者。你写:

    有一次,他漫不经心地认为,如果俄罗斯想要在乌克兰取得胜利,然后再进军芬兰,就必须动员一百五十万人。

    是本文中唯一提到芬兰的人。 (搜索页面,出现一次)。如果您想总结里特的评论并包括“前往芬兰”,您最好找到里特对该国的提及。

    你提出了相当严重的指控,但没有任何证据。

    可恶的记者!

    • 回复: @Antiwar7
    , @ProfessorChops
  17. Rahan 说:

    与广岛和长崎事件至少有一半的目的是向斯大林表明“不要超出约定,西欧是我们的”,西方今天的反应可能至少有一半是在向中国发出信息。

    此外,通过克劳斯改革实现人类“软着陆”的大多数基本措施很可能在今年和明年启动,所以现在就像是 20 世纪做事方式的“最后欢呼”。普京知道这一点,习近平也知道这一点。但习近平必须把注意力集中在今年的政治局会议上,看看谁能再次担任人民民主的舵手——他还是其他新人。

    • 同意: meamjojo
  18. gT 说:

    一些新的榴弹炮抵达乌克兰并不是火车撞车。 顿涅茨克和卢甘斯克仍然会被解放,然后可能会轮到哈尔科夫,然后轮到敖德萨。 一些西方武器正在通过摩尔多瓦进入,因此在赫尔松可以看到它们,但俄罗斯现在不能去轰炸摩尔多瓦。

    时间绝对站在俄罗斯一边,他们可以无限期地进行轰炸和精确打击,尤其是在顿涅斯克特和卢甘斯克解放后。 如果俄罗斯需要更多的人,那么他们可以接受来自伊拉克和伊朗等穆斯林国家,甚至阿富汗的所有志愿者。 如果这意味着一些美国人会死去,朝鲜的火箭人肯定愿意放弃他的 200 特种部队中的一些。

    为什么俄罗斯如此迅速地征服乌克兰,不着急,北约不会完全介入。 事实上,只有北约介入,俄罗斯才需要动员起来。

    • 回复: @Realist
    , @Emslander
  19. Daniel H 说:

    当数百亿美元的设备涌入而俄罗斯无法阻止的情况下,这是不可能发生的

    然后,也许俄罗斯会选择一个可以拦截设备的地方:公海、航空运输、波兰铁路和公路运输,这样就可以与美国/北约进行全面、明确的战争,并且存在超现实的可能性的核冲突。

    • 回复: @meamjojo
  20. Anon[385]• 免责声明 说:

    顿巴斯解放后,俄罗斯虽然无法完全阻止在西乌克兰的军事实力建设,但可以利用“脱下手套”的威胁迫使乌克兰接受停火并承认其在顿巴斯和南乌克兰的领土损失。俄罗斯还可以威胁占领敖德萨并永远锁定乌克兰内陆!如果乌克兰愚蠢地坚持继续战争,基辅将变成废墟。

    对于芬兰,俄罗斯已经承诺“强化边境”。但如此长的边界总是有一些有争议的地区——甚至几平方英里——俄罗斯可以占领。芬兰会抱怨,但对此无能为力。更重要的是,由于北约宪章禁止接纳有边界争端的成员国,这将把芬兰排除在北约之外,这对北约来说可能更好,因为它节省了另一个潜在的火点。

    • 回复: @Realist
  21. animalogic 说:

    我看不出里特改变他的分析有什么问题。
    他审视了新的客观事实,认为这些事实很重要,并在此基础上改变了他对冲突的看法。
    这正是我们应该希望我们的公共评论员所做的。客观应对新形势。如果我们想要谎言和无意义的宣传,我们可以回到 MSM(上帝帮助你/我们)。
    这并不是说里特是“正确的”——而是说他是 试图 成为。 (这比 MSM 多得多)。

    • 同意: peterAUS
    • 回复: @PetrOldSack
  22. animalogic 说:
    @anonymous

    好点。所有这些看起来都有点“Volkssturm”——这意味着什么。

  23. 当里特在里拉身上贴出完全错误的讣告时,我对他感到不满。除非(((某人)))告诉他这样做,否则没有专业理由这样做。有关军情六处和CP的评论是新信息,但如果属实,绝对有理由将他的观点列入黑名单,无论他是亲俄罗斯还是亲环球同人。

    • 回复: @Bill Jones
  24. animalogic 说:
    @Richard B

    “无论怎样,他们不仅会失败,而且正在失败。”
    假设这是真的——但他们失败的速度够快吗?
    世界、文明都在运转。现在在乌克兰,计时器里的沙子跑得越来越快……。

    • 回复: @Richard B
  25. Notsofast 说:

    ……乌克兰是第三次世界大战的第一场战斗……这是正确的,我认为俄罗斯人从一开始就明白这一点。 这是一场经济战争,西方正在输得很惨,现在全力以赴,他们知道他们继续实施经济庞氏骗局的唯一途径是让整个世界处于战争状态,并迫使所有国家选择一方。

    我认为,随着时间在更大的经济战争中站在他们一边,俄罗斯人将继续采取缓慢而慎重的做法。 由于缺乏经验的乌克兰征兵部队烧毁了北约的装备,北约国家开始对脾气暴躁的乌克兰政府及其刺猬大师永无止境的要求犹豫不决。 国防接触者警告称,由于供应链问题,中国将进入便利的封锁,进一步扰乱了它们的替换,导致耗尽库存的补充延迟。

    如果不彻底摧毁西方经济,俄罗斯的石油禁运是不可能的,四分之三的拒绝用欧元支付的欧盟国家现在已经开设了俄罗斯账户以继续支付。

    是的,这将是一场漫长的战争,除非北约意识到他们已经落入了他们为俄罗斯设置的陷阱。 奥斯汀打电话给绍伊古并要求停火是很有说服力的,这似乎要么是一种绝望的行为,要么更不祥地是一种核假旗的威胁。 无论哪种方式,我相信俄罗斯人已经为此做好了准备。

    • 谢谢: Iris
    • 回复: @Rev. Spooner
    , @John Johnson
  26. Mark Matis 说:

    我怀疑,如果普京用核武器攻击大克拉波尔、肮脏德尔菲亚、波士顿、腐败区、拉特兰塔、风大屎以及美国各地的许多屎坑,战争会很快结束。世界将会因此而变得更加美好!

  27. “乌克兰是第三次世界大战的第一场战役”。那是真实的。但重要的是要看到模式——超越分析——它揭示了每个大国最终都会遭遇它试图避免的战争:它自己的毁灭。当然,每个人都希望避免核战争。
    https://patternofhistory.wordpress.com/

  28. pyrrhus 说:

    这一新的评估与乌克兰士兵的说法背道而驰,乌克兰士兵称,实际上到达他们手中的美国装备几乎没有什么用处,泽连斯基还召集了完全未经训练的预备队……还有普京不会失败的事实,如果被逼到的话,他会释放炸弹和导弹……

    但最终,俄罗斯比世界上任何国家都拥有更多的石油和战略矿产,不会允许它们被破产的西方没收……这就是为什么大多数国家支持俄罗斯反对帝国主义……

  29. bwuce wee 说:

    普京并没有试图超越乌克兰并将其并入俄罗斯。普京正试图确保两个俄语地区的安全,这些地区决定不想成为乌克兰的一部分。这些地区六年多来一直受到懦弱的攻击。他还可能保留克里米亚。这些似乎是他的目标,也是他既定的目标。所以说实话,他没有全面发动闪电战也就不足为奇了。他的既定目标之一是阻止人口贩运和生物实验室生产流行病武器——看起来他成功了。所以他的杯子是 2/6 gull,而其他人都认为他的杯子是 1/2 空的。此外,美国在武装乌克兰的同时基本上已经解除了自己的武装),更不用说通过他的疫苗授权将所有真正的士兵赶出军队!) - 那么他的主要敌人正在解除武装自己,他还能要求什么更好的结果呢?战争就是这样赢得胜利的。美国正在让自己破产,并完全按照普京的计划解除自己的武装。他一边下棋,一边受到棋手的批评。仔细想想,你们这些可悲的跳棋玩家。我们发射的所有这些导弹将需要数年时间才能更换。与此同时,美国面临着大规模饥饿、封锁、大规模失业(每月有数百万非法移民)——这是自大萧条以来最糟糕的情况。救命,布兰登——请救救我们……这里真是一群短视的混蛋!

    • 同意: Truth Vigilante
    • 回复: @bwuce wee
  30. Anon[385]• 免责声明 说:

    看到俄罗斯在乌克兰陷入困境,源源不断的武器流向不存在的前线,进行反攻,最终俄罗斯失败,就像美国在越南遭受的那样,这将是北约的梦想。有一些主要差异使得这种情况在乌克兰不太可能发生:

    1. 俄罗斯在人口大多亲俄的地区开展活动。这有很大的不同。多大?只要问问任何一个去过战区的军人就知道了。

    2. 俄罗斯吞并领土上的乌克兰人要么获得俄罗斯公民身份,要么生活在完全自治/独立的 LPR/DPR 国家。对于他们中的大多数人来说,这是2014年开始的战争的结束。很难想象解放区的人们,享受完全的独立/公民身份,冒着生命危险,参与游击战,为乌克兰政权而战,而他们并没有这样做。首先想成为其中的一部分。没有发生在克里米亚,没有理由相信它会发生在乌克兰东部/南部。

    3、乌克兰政权100%依赖西方支持。一旦欧洲涌入超过 10 万难民(乌克兰西部尚未受到影响,但这很可能会改变),这些国家的经济崩溃,而在美国,共和党人更愿意质疑这种必要性,这种支持就会减弱。新保守主义自由派战争的胜利,赢得选举。美国的盟友经常被美国背叛——这不是第一次,乌克兰应该考虑到这一点。

  31. Trumpeter 说:

    击沉几艘运往美国的货船,切断几条通往欧洲的管道,在全球南方引发一场小饥荒,移民遍及美国和欧洲。
    住在玻璃房里的人…

  32. @Mustapha Mond

    当人体盾牌死亡时,这是使用人体盾牌的组织的错。

    确保不再使用任何形式的人质的最佳方法就是射杀人质。这在情感上可能很困难,但在逻辑上却微不足道。

    应该进行一些粗略的谈判尝试,以防万一他们不认真。但是,请务必提及,如果他们不交出人质,您将射杀人质,然后指控他们犯有杀人罪。

    • 回复: @Mustapha Mond
    , @Carlo
  33. Anon[385]• 免责声明 说:

    如果斯科特·里特是正确的,我必须提醒人们伟大的沃尔特·米尔斯海默最近所说的话:“大国不会只是说‘嘿,这不起作用’然后放弃。他们只是脱掉手套,给世界带来痛苦。” ——我怀疑,如果乌克兰在俄罗斯完成顿巴斯解放后坚持让战争继续下去,那么乌克兰战争的下一阶段将会是什么样子。换句话说,乌克兰西部将变成废墟,其基础设施将被摧毁,另外10多万难民将涌入欧洲。

    • 回复: @Realist
    , @Rubicon
  34. 斯科特·里特(Scott Ritter)是一名政客,从来没有讲述过完整的故事。

    很高兴他比大多数政客少撒谎。然而,这并不意味着他基本上不是谎言之父撒旦的奴隶。

  35. DrDog 说:

    我对里特先生“态度大转变”的唯一质疑是他为什么不早点得出结论?我个人只给了 UA 一周的时间,然后他们就超支了。当这种情况没有发生时,我调整了观望心态。里特比我拥有更好的背景和对历史的鉴赏力。但我只想说,UA 是 RU 的越南。

    * 它不是战斗装甲突击,它是游击战。
    * UA在关键点采取了一种堑壕战的方式进行防御。必须将 VC 连根拔出隧道。
    * 波兰相当于海防港,NVm。既用于供应又用于UA人员的培训。就像过去和现在一样,RU可以看到补给线,但在不扩大战争范围的情况下却无能为力。
    * 被遗弃的资源被用来对付他们。同上。同上。

    改变的是一些关键套件。无人机、Stugna-P 和毒刺机使排对装甲和低空空战具有致命性。这些武器极大地改变了交战的经济性。当标枪摧毁一辆价值 60-2 万美元的坦克或自行火炮时,3 万美元的标枪是很便宜的。

    最可悲的事实是,这一切都是可以避免的。 RU不是食人魔,UA也不是圣人。双方都应对世界部分地区的大规模饥饿负责。

    • 同意: Irish Savant
  36. anon[584]• 免责声明 说:

    不是为了指责里特,而是中央情报局在让他接近伊拉克之前就对他进行了敲诈勒索。他们有一个弥天大谎要说,他们不会把它留给某个自由的人。他的工作是嗅出萨达姆根本不存在的大规模杀伤性武器。尽管有最先进的技术,里特随后还是以诚实的报道证明了自己无罪。

    里特可能是一门松散的大炮,尽管这证明了他的铜球。中央情报局无疑正在威胁他的亲人、他的资产、他的生命。他们直接从科米在 Playpen 上的私人库存中为他下载了 63 TB 的妓女视频。俄罗斯证明中情局禁用生物武器的证据对中情局政权构成了生存威胁。

    不管里特的真实想法如何,他的论点都是有说服力的。那么就谈谈优点吧。俄罗斯可以在方便的时候掐断北约的绳索。为什么他们没有这样做?因为中央情报局小心翼翼地使用英国人生活所需的基础设施。这是中央情报局不变的剧本,用敌人的正派来对付他们。让俄罗斯饿死乌克兰以停止战争。然后让波诺 (Bono)、芭芭拉·史翠珊 (Barbara Streisand) 和两百个 80 年代的发带唱“我们是霍霍斯,我们是纳粹”,弹奏、弹奏、弹奏。

    不用说,Systema 表明响应不对称。俄罗斯控制着中央情报局的有罪不罚者。等待嚎叫。

    • 回复: @Mitar
  37. Realist 说:
    @gT

    为什么俄罗斯如此迅速地征服乌克兰,不着急,北约不会完全介入。 事实上,只有北约介入,俄罗斯才需要动员起来。

    美国/北约从一开始就参与其中。他们是发起这件事的人。如果俄罗斯对此一无所知……他们就输了。延长战争总是愚蠢的。

    • 回复: @Anonymous
    , @Herald
  38. Realist 说:
    @Anon

    顿巴斯解放后,俄罗斯虽然无法完全阻止在西乌克兰的军事实力建设,但可以利用“脱下手套”的威胁迫使乌克兰接受停火并承认其在顿巴斯和南乌克兰的领土损失。

    永远不要威胁…DO

    俄罗斯还可以威胁占领敖德萨并永远锁定乌克兰内陆!如果乌克兰愚蠢地坚持继续战争,基辅将变成废墟。

    这应该是原计划的一部分。

    对于芬兰,俄罗斯已经承诺“强化边境”。但如此长的边界总是有一些有争议的地区——甚至几平方英里——俄罗斯可以占领。芬兰会抱怨,但对此无能为力。

    同意。

  39. Anonymous[137]• 免责声明 说:

    嗯。俄罗斯将赢得这场胜利,否则世界就会终结。他们不仅更强大、更有能力在世界的那个地区做出承诺并升级(如果有推动的话),而且他们也知道这是一场关乎生存的斗争。如果有必要,他们将全面使用核武器,这是他们失败的唯一情况。

    还有其他人。

  40. Realist 说:
    @Anon

    他们只是脱掉手套,给世界带来痛苦。”

    俄罗斯一开始就不应该戴手套。

    • 同意: Fred777
  41. @Alrenous

    “确保不再使用任何形式的人质的最佳方法是射杀人质。 这可能在情感上很困难,但在逻辑上是微不足道的。”

    你来自以色列吗?

    或者你只是把 Keyser Soze 在“通常的嫌疑人”中拍摄他的妻子和孩子的照片拍得太认真了吗?

    我怀疑弗拉德会坚持到底,放过平民并处理这种选择的后果。 (但也许他也看过《惯常的嫌疑人》,并且很快就会让平民成为集体的“牺牲品”。不知怎的,我对此表示怀疑……我的意思是,他不是英国人,或者更糟的是,他不是美国领导人。)

    • 谢谢: Alrenous
    • 回复: @Alrenous
    , @Lurker
  42. Greg S. 说:

    我认为这里真正要问的问题是:谁在流血?

    全球主义阴谋集团的意图(让我们不要假装这场冲突是由一个国家推动的)是通过使用乌克兰人作为炮灰来流血俄罗斯。 乌克兰人被完全控制的国家媒体洗脑,提供武器、训练、前线“顾问”、卫星和其他军事情报,然后被送去死。 全球主义者不在乎整个乌克兰是否化为灰烬,只要冲突继续下去,俄罗斯人继续死亡。 那是他们的计划。

    从表面上看,俄罗斯对此的反应确实很奇怪。 他们为这次“特别行动”投入了相对较少的军事资源(在他们看来,这不是一场战争),并且似乎满足于让西方对乌克兰方面的“援助”几乎有增无减。 一些知道这一点的俄罗斯圈子里有很多人咬牙切齿,他们知道俄罗斯可以做得更多、更快,但没有这样做。

    我解释这一点的理论是,俄罗斯实际上是在试图扭转这个等式,让全球主义者成为长期流血的人。 如果俄罗斯能够成功地利用他们的小规模军事力量不断碾压乌克兰的炮灰,并不断摧毁和/或俘获西方投掷的每一件武器,并让西方的开支超过俄罗斯几个数量级,那么实际上俄罗斯可以经受住让这场冲突基本上永远持续下去。 西方想在对抗俄罗斯的前线将每一个乌克兰人都扔到死? 俄罗斯说:“好吧,那么我们将杀死所有拿起武器反对我们的乌克兰人,只要它需要。” 冲突并非发生在俄罗斯领土上。 俄罗斯在其他地方的防御并不脆弱。 正常的俄罗斯人生活并没有受到太大影响。 首当其冲的实际上是乌克兰人——说俄语的人——再次承受了痛苦。

    俄罗斯也肯定知道目前西方正在发生的全面内爆吗? 永无止境的 COVID 死亡镜头造成的高死亡率(我没有听说俄罗斯人服用了第四和第五剂 Sputnik,是吗?)、供应链中断、经济崩溃、美元贬值、巨额债务,4 -5% 的通货膨胀,没有婴儿配方奶粉等等。我没听说俄罗斯婴儿会挨饿,是吗? 那么谁真正输了,谁真正赢了呢? 从我的角度来看,俄罗斯需要做的就是解决冲突,等待全球主义的谎言帝国自杀。

  43. bwuce wee 说:
    @bwuce wee

    美国海军上将从乌克兰非法美国生物武器大流行实验室向普京投降:

    https://halturnerradioshow.com/index.php/en/news-page/world/reports-u-s-admiral-surrenders-to-russia-in-mariupol-ukraine

    这是普京宣称的目标之一:揭露美国在乌克兰的非法生物武器实验室——这正是拜登每天捐出数十亿美元税款来保护他对流行病规划生物实验室的投资的原因!

    • 谢谢: Notsofast
  44. @Richard Steven Hack

    也许,只是也许,里特并不是他所吹捧的那样:一个向权力说出真相的极其勇敢的灵魂。 也许他是一个正常人,可以受到威胁或贿赂而屈服。 或者可能更糟。

    我记得几年前在关键时刻把里特视为一个隐蔽的、受控的反对声音,并且很少阅读他在 RT 上发表的评估。 这种分析可能是正确的。 也许不吧。 也许他是对的。

    无论如何,我们将看到事情是如何从这里开始的。

    通过他们的成果(和预测),你们将认识他们……。

    • 回复: @Anonymous
  45. 许多观察家似乎认为俄罗斯联邦和普京总统希望重新征服苏联和/或沙皇帝国的领土。

    但我没有看到任何可靠的证据表明俄罗斯政府的目标超出了确保和解放乌克兰东部和乌克兰南部的范围。

    显然,普京总统和大多数俄罗斯公民比英国北约-以色列帝国的战争傀儡更明智。

    不用说,如果我们在美国和欧洲拥有合法政府,那么自三十年前苏联解体以来,俄罗斯联邦就会一直是我们的盟友。

    您对盖洛普通讯社报道超过百分之七十(>70%)的美国公民一贯反对所谓的“美国政府”感到惊讶吗?

    https://news.gallup.com/poll/1600/congress-public.aspx

    • 回复: @Flying Dutchman
  46. Bro43rd 说:
    @northeast

    是的,自跨美战争以来,美国还没有赢得过军事冲突,但他们在经济上主导了世界。无论他们走到哪里,都安装基于债务的系统。我想说他们已经接管了。我同意他们的控制正在减弱并且离墓地不远。

  47. 里特并没有改变态度。他说,摧毁顿巴斯的乌克主力部队所花费的时间比他想象的要长得多。一旦这些部队投降,人们认为乌克部队将无法填补乌克兰中部的空缺,而俄罗斯则可以继续前进。里特没想到美国的大规模援助包括直接在波兰训练尤克斯。这些新单位应该准备好填补这一空白。我预计这些单位将包括数千名中央情报局承包商,以维护所有新的北约装备。

    请注意,乌克人的数量是入侵的俄罗斯军队的三倍。他们一开始就动员了后备力量。普京没有将大部分现役军队派往乌克兰,也没有动员他的300万预备役部队。普京需要迅速加大力度,派遣更多军队,以免他的军队最终陷入西进的漫长困境。

    • 回复: @Miro23
  48. @you

    俄罗斯需要允许 50 万名志愿者与正规部队一起加入乌克兰的攻势,这样他们就可以向正规部队学习、协助和增援。

    俄罗斯还需要动员100万以上的士兵在后方提供安全保障,以腾出正规部队进行战斗。

    这将加快攻势,让齐奥帝国没有时间重新训练更多献祭的非犹太人派往前线拖延他们的失败。

    • 同意: Mefobills
  49. @jimbojones

    保罗·卡里格·罗伯茨是对的,普京太软弱太谨慎了。 一旦战争开始,你必须准备好全力以赴。

    俄罗斯需要允许 50 万名志愿者与正规部队一起加入乌克兰的攻势,这样他们就可以向正规部队学习、协助和增援。
    俄罗斯还需要动员100万以上的士兵在后方提供安全保障,以腾出正规部队进行战斗。
    这将加快攻势,让齐奥帝国没有时间重新训练更多献祭的非犹太人派往前线拖延他们的失败。

  50. 泽连斯基表示,他愿意动员一百万人,而西方已准备好提供资金和装备,将这百万人变成真正的军事威胁。
    此时,所有符合条件的年轻人都偷偷逃往欧洲邻国。乌克兰军队是如此绝望,以至于他们抓住了在加油站排队加油的人。他们缺乏燃料。俄罗斯人摧毁了所有炼油厂和大部分储存地点,由于轨道轨距不同,不可能通过铁路获取燃料。

    • 回复: @Commentator Mike
  51. Richard B 说:
    @animalogic

    “无论怎样,他们不仅会失败,而且正在失败。”
    假设这是真的——但他们失败的速度够快吗?

    很好的问题。简短的回答是: 我们拭目以待。 但你的问题的相关性以及无论哪种方式都没有可靠答案的事实似乎是日益严重的不适的原因。

    有一点是肯定的,生物学理论并不能向我们保证人类将成为一个成功的物种。我认为可以提出一个非常有力的论据,即现在正在发生的事情是我们正在接受进化测试,并且很可能会失败。

    也许对这种可能性的日益认识是这种不适的真正根源。

    • 回复: @Alrenous
    , @Ace
  52. StanJ 说:

    劳埃德·奥斯汀为什么给谢尔盖·绍伊古打电话?

    • 同意: nokangaroos
  53. @Jon Chance

    但我没有看到任何可靠的证据表明俄罗斯政府的目标超出了确保和解放乌克兰东部和乌克兰南部的范围。

    俄罗斯的既定目标包括整个边疆地区的全面非军事化、去纳粹化和中立化。由此可见,要实现这些目标,需要多少领土就必须获得多少领土。我想说,这意味着整个乌克兰,因为任何不安全的空间都会成为纳粹堡垒,北约的全部力量都会流入其中。

    • 回复: @Jon Chance
  54. @Mustapha Mond

    你听起来不像来自以色列,所以你可能不应该表现得好像你来自以色列。感谢您让我知道您不知道自己在说什么;纯粹的社交姿态,零思维。

    你不负责任地鼓励使用人质和人体盾牌。 “他们工作!继续做吧!”

    或者你是否负责任地试图让尽可能多的非战斗人员受到恐吓和/或杀害? 你们越是像你们一样鼓励使用人体盾牌,当我们到达最后的突然停止时,你们就越需要射击。

    这确实是一种堕落的程度。我其实有点印象深刻。

  55. anon[379]• 免责声明 说:

    奥尔森上将,考虑到《公民权利和政治权利国际公约》第 14 条第 2 款第 g 款规定的免于逼供的自由,您是否打算根据《罗马规约》第 56 条提供有关被禁生物武器的证据?

    吸吮这个,艾薇儿。吸到它喷出来为止。

  56. IronForge 说:

    还有一期。

    仔细查看了里特的维基百科简介……

    在联合国期间,里特与 ISR 政府密切合作,破译了美国借用的 U-2 飞机的监视图像。

    因此,他与 ISR 政府建立了英特尔工作关系。索罗斯-施瓦茨、布林肯、努德尔曼-卡根、科洛莫伊斯基和泽伦斯基可萨里-阿什肯纳兹部落在这场冲突中徘徊——这是另一个值得怀疑的原因。

    我不在乎里特是否有来自英国/俄罗斯的配偶/姻亲(IIRC,他声称他有)。

    抱歉。

  57. @Richard B

    俄罗斯可以轻松获胜。普京所需要的只是与以色列总理私下交谈,表明以色列、美国和欧盟(即齐奥殖民地)向乌克兰提供进一步援助是不可取的。一架大型高超音速飞机可能会抵达并在特拉维夫上空驱散问候。

    • 同意: Irish Savant
    • 回复: @anon
  58. HeyHeyHey 说:
    @Richard Steven Hack

    对于那些感兴趣的人,里特先生在 2002 年的一次采访中谈到了联邦调查局的骚扰:

    您是否因间谍活动而受到调查?

    自 1996 年以来,我一直被称为以色列间谍,自 2000 年拍摄纪录片以来,联邦调查局 (FBI) 就将我作为伊拉克特工进行调查。联邦调查局还对我的妻子展开调查,称她为克格勃间谍。因此,这种形式的骚扰正在发生。 [1]

    无论如何,我发现很难将他最近关于乌克兰的言论与他不到两周前写的一篇专栏文章联系起来:

    拜登正在向乌克兰发送价值数十亿美元但无法正常使用的武器

    美国和北约似乎满足于向乌克兰提供旧的、破旧的(这里的关键词是“过时”)装备,这些装备几乎肯定会在战斗条件下迅速损坏,而且乌克兰没有适当的后勤支持计划。

    。 。 。

    佩洛西的访问被描述为表明拜登政府通过向乌克兰提供其一直要求的重型武器,致力于让乌克兰在与俄罗斯的持续冲突中获胜。但现实却大不相同——拜登和佩洛西向乌克兰提供的装备几乎肯定会在进入战斗后不久就损坏,而且乌克兰手头没有基础设施来维护和修理,拜登和佩洛西所做的只不过是为乌克兰人提供食物而已。军事自杀药并称之为营养品。

    有这样的朋友,谁还需要敌人呢。 [2]

    将上述内容与文章中引用的他最近的言论进行比较:

    这就是为什么我从根本上改变了我的总体评估,因为我一直假设俄罗斯能够拦截绝大多数此类设备,但俄罗斯已经表明自己无法或不愿意这样做,因此—— – 乌克兰人正在战场上产生有意义的影响。

    因此,俄罗斯无法拦截“几乎肯定会在进入战斗后不久就损坏”的装备,等等。为什么这会改变战争的进程呢?

    [1] http://content.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,351165,00.html

    [2] https://www.rt.com/russia/555029-western-weapon-supplies-ukrainian-suicide/

  59. Antiwar7 说:
    @Using the Search Function

    里特在那次采访中确实谈到了芬兰。不知道你在说什么。

  60. @DrDog

    这些武器极大地改变了交战的经济性。当标枪摧毁一辆价值 60-2 万美元的坦克或自行火炮时,3 万美元的标枪是很便宜的。

    对?

    这就是为什么我强烈不同意所有评论员声称坦克没有死的原因。

    在现代冲突中,我们充其量可以说坦克的用例现在是 非常 有限。

    • 回复: @Daniel H
    , @Lurker
  61. @Greg S.

    此外,俄罗斯肯定意识到西方目前正在发生彻底的内爆?……供应链崩溃……。

    这就是为什么我质疑西方可以无限期地向乌克兰倾销武器的想法。

    多个军队已经在抱怨库存耗尽。

    台湾榴弹炮推迟到 2026 年是 MIC 生产存在问题的另一个迹象。

    至于刺拳,西方可能已经用这些打进了一个巨大的乌龙球,因为他们似乎正在努力缩小西方和俄罗斯 TFR 之间的差距。

  62. Anonymous[137]• 免责声明 说:
    @Realist

    延长战争总是愚蠢的。

    如果你不明白几乎每次战争都会偏向某一方,那么你就不应该乱说“愚蠢”之类的词。

    乌克兰士兵的死亡人数令人难以承受,所以时间在流逝。他们对“我们会赢”的叙事的信念每天都被现实摧毁,所以他们愿意为向他们推销这种叙事的(((人)))而被撕裂的意愿……至少可以说正在消失。

    类似的过程也开始在西方“我与乌克兰站在一起”的全国人大群体中发生。当成本很低时,很容易摆出姿势。当你变得更冷、更穷、对生存失去信心时,坚持那些廉价的内啡肽就会变得更加困难。

    作为一名欧洲人,我已经看到一些全国人大重新审视他们浅薄的、以前不需要付出代价的“信念”,只是因为当前的通货膨胀影响。当这堆乱七八糟的花朵超出了他们的痛苦阈值时,其他人将会收到警钟。这一系列痛苦才刚刚开始,尤其是欧洲,应对它的准备最不充分。

    • 同意: Kratoklastes
    • 回复: @Realist
    , @al gore rhythms
  63. nsa 说:

    俄罗斯联邦横跨11个时区,拥有世界1/4至1/3的资源。这是犹太人和他们那些有用的白痴们的圣杯……帝国在 1990 世纪 XNUMX 年代初就拿到了这个奖品,但让它溜走了。鲁斯基人能保住他们的资源吗?
    胆小的鲁斯基人需要停止歌舞伎剧院并变得严肃起来:
    1)通过拆除发电厂附属的50至100个变电站来摧毁ukie电网。没有现代社会存在于黑暗中……没有照明,没有互联网,没有通讯。 10万难民涌入欧洲,而那些仍然在吃宠物的人。
    2)波罗的海国家仍与俄罗斯电网相连。打开开关,让他们也生活在黑暗中,思考他们的西方价值观……色情、变态和贫困。
    3) 切断所有乌拉尔轻质原油和天然气到所有北约带的连接。让他们在炼油厂中注入沙特泥,并用太阳能电池板和捕鸟风车加热。
    4)最终,可能有必要摧毁像柏林这样的无核欧洲首都,看看核武器国家是否真的愿意进行报复并冒着全面热核交换的风险……再见伦敦、Joorusalem、JooYork、华盛顿特区、Joos Angeles , ETC
    或者胆怯的鲁斯基人可以继续歌舞伎剧院并鼓励全球同性恋帝国……而失去的不仅仅是麦当劳特许经营权和Netflix订阅。

    • 同意: allgoodnamestaken
    • 哈哈: Rurik
    • 回复: @Bro43rd
    , @Rev. Spooner
  64. Falcon 22 说:

    俄罗斯有道德制高点??这是我听过的最愚蠢的说法!
    乌克兰有权利成为纳粹。如果他们愿意,只要他们不适应二战旧纳粹政权更邪恶的一面。俄罗斯在二战期间、之前以及之后犯下的极端​​人道罪行是怎样的?我们应该去俄罗斯、俄罗斯人吗?
    俄罗斯无权仅仅因为某个国家是加入北约的边境国家就对其使用核武器。这和古巴不一样。苏联无视条约协议,对古巴实施核打击。我们本可以用核武器武装日本和韩国,但我们没有。

    • 同意: meamjojo
    • 回复: @Rev. Spooner
    , @Dubik
  65. @Flying Dutchman

    也许俄罗斯可以通过在乌克兰西部建立禁飞区并用导弹拦截北约运送的武器和物资来避免对乌克兰西部的地面占领。

    只要俄罗斯能保住乌克兰东部和乌克兰南部,为什么还要在乌克兰西部陷入困境呢?

    就芬兰而言,只要芬兰人用卢布支付租金,为什么俄罗斯不会享受芬兰人的入侵呢?

    这场战争不仅是军事、政治和经济的战争,也是文化的战争。

    如果没有宣传,欧洲有多少人会支持俄罗斯而不是欧盟?

    • 回复: @HeyHeyHey
  66. @Alrenous

    是的,你来自以色列好吧……。 和一个精神病患者。 两者经常结伴而行……。

  67. Anonymous[137]• 免责声明 说:
    @Mustapha Mond

    也许,只是也许,里特并不是他所吹捧的那样:一个向权力说出真相的极其勇敢的灵魂。 也许他是一个正常人,可以受到威胁或贿赂而屈服。

    真的。 在最近一次比较无聊的采访中,他花了很多时间讨论他对当天开始反对 Globohomo 的决定的遗憾。 他从字面上说,如果有机会倒带时间磁带,他就不会这样做——不是因为从那时起强加给他的艰辛,而是因为那些强加给他家人的困难。

    我猜他是在谈论经济困难,如果情况确实如此,那么很明显,一个 Globohomo 的代表怎么能用一袋钱和一个模糊的呼吁让他像所有士兵一样“爱国”。

    • 谢谢: Mustapha Mond
  68. HeyHeyHey 说:
    @Jon Chance

    这场战争不仅是军事、政治和经济的战争,也是文化的战争。

    是的,不幸的是这是不可否认的。乌克兰官员毫不犹豫地承认了这一点。二月里, Ukrinform 甚至发表请愿书禁止 讨论 媒体中的俄罗斯文化:

    https://www.ukrinform.net/rubric-ato/3415750-ukraine-demands-cultural-sanctions-against-russia.html

    书展、电影节、艺术展览、音乐表演——所有这些都将俄罗斯作家、导演、艺术家和音乐家排除在外。他们甚至请求媒体“停止报道俄罗斯文化”。

    Ukrinform 是乌克兰国家通讯社。值得注意的是,请愿书上的前两个名字是:

    乌克兰文化和信息政策部长Oleksandr Tkachenko

    Galyna Grygorenko,乌克兰国家艺术与艺术教育机构负责人

    可悲的是,西方有许多人遵守这些要求。另一方面,我们中的一些人更加决心研究和弘扬俄罗斯文化。

  69. @Richard B

    他们在美国国内对白人做同样的事情。白人、俄罗斯人和巴勒斯坦人几乎都属于全球替罪羊的同一篮子。

    还有虔诚的穆斯林、虔诚的基督徒、立宪爱国者、保守派……

    你所说的犹太至上主义公司,我称之为犹太法西斯主义。是的,它是一个没有思想、没有灵魂、非人性的实体(拉比和大师系统地使其如此)。它认为人性是软弱的、软弱的和容易上当受骗的。然而,它利用像((查克·舒默))这样的大师和像大屠杀正典这样的教条,将自己描绘成“麻木不仁”的非犹太人的永恒“受害者”。

    所以我们面对的是一个精神变态、专横、恶霸的人,他认为自己是受迫害的受害者,有权亵渎和破坏。这就是犹太法西斯主义,它存在于公司之前,也将存在于公司之后。事实上,该公司的地位仅次于犹太法西斯实体。

    为了阻止它,以色列可能必须遭到核武器攻击,并且((犹太人))和犹太复国主义者沦为奴隶。这是现代基督教世界的困境,因为它把自己视为一个团体耶稣,因为它与((犹太人))关系如此之深,并让自己屈服于全能的货币兑换商。

    西方文明的传统基督教徒毫不犹豫地用核武器攻击以色列并使杀害基督的人成为奴隶。他们认识到犹太法西斯主义者的真实本性和性格,并看清其本质:一只疯狗。

  70. Catdog 说:

    我也对进展缓慢和第二阶段从未实现感到厌倦,但我不相信里特的论点。西方的军事援助相当小。当乌克兰拥有完整的军队和志愿者而不是应征入伍的士兵时,乌克兰无法阻止俄罗斯占领其大片领土。除非北约能够向乌克兰人提供比二月份更多的材料(他们不能),否则情况不会改变。北约也没有无限的武器。美国已经在第三世界的垃圾场寻找苏联坦克。

    • 回复: @Alrenous
  71. Bro43rd 说:
    @nsa

    这不是他们一直持有到最后一手牌的牌吗?一旦玩过就无法取消播放。

  72. Catdog 说:
    @DrDog

    60万美元的标枪在摧毁价值2-3万美元的坦克或自行火炮时是很便宜的。

    当一颗 50 美元的子弹也能杀死一名身价昂贵的士兵时,它就很便宜了。但当然,这种逻辑的缺陷是显而易见的。有多少标枪在到达前线之前被摧毁或“丢失”?有多少人被俘虏或被遗弃而没有被解雇?在实际发射的子弹中,有多少真正击中,而这些击中中有多少实际上被击倒?军火商假装 1 支标枪 = 1 辆死坦克,但显然事实并非如此。

  73. j2 说:

    西方的一个预测是,俄罗斯将在未来一两周内尝试用三支军队对基辅发起新的攻击,这三支军队是它从俄罗斯各地集结起来的,并从上次对基辅的攻击中重新武装起来。斯科特·里特自然不会提及这个威胁,因为
    他是一位有某些外部目标的政治分析家。无论如何,乌克兰应该做好准备。

  74. 结果不应改变忠诚度。我相信俄罗斯,因为西方给我的印象是邪恶的,多年来我一直有这种感觉。即使俄罗斯损失惨重,为什么我会突然认为西方也不错呢?我从未服过兵役,我只是尽可能地追随历史。没有人说这会是一件容易的事,双方都很顽固,正如他们的历史所证明的那样。拭目以待,就像vax一样,时间会展现出更真实的形象。有些是对的,有些是错的。如果我错了,它不会杀了我,但如果我偷偷加入对方,就会让我变得更渺小。光荣俄罗斯,郑重声明。

  75. peterAUS 说:

    好文章。

    看到中校回过神来,我感到很惊喜。

    但有一点除外:RF 在乌克兰东部没有获胜。它沿着一个轴线缓慢而痛苦地前进(在此过程中失去人员和物资),同时,在同一个战区沿着另一轴线失去领土。

    还有其他几点,但我们暂时不考虑它们。
    及时。说……一个月后。

    • 回复: @Truth Vigilante
  76. Herald 说:
    @anonymous

    许多年轻人已经从乌克兰潜逃,不想面对俄罗斯的磨床。 虽然已经征召了大量年老且无能的乌克兰人,最初是作为摇摇欲坠的家庭警卫部队,但他们现在发现自己被推到前线充当炮灰。 这些不幸的人所能期望的最好的结果就是受伤足以被送回家。

  77. meamjojo 说:
    @Daniel H

    “然后,也许俄罗斯会选择一个可以拦截设备的地方:公海、航空运输、波兰铁路和公路运输,这样就可以与美国/北约和超级大国进行全面、明确的战争。核冲突的真实可能性。 ”

    让我们继续!是时候把俄罗斯碾碎了。并击败并四分之一普京。

    • 哈哈: 36 ulster
    • 回复: @Hal Womack
    , @frnmlanm
  78. Miro23 说:
    @Carlton Meyer

    请注意,乌克人的数量是入侵的俄罗斯军队的三倍。他们一开始就动员了后备力量。普京没有将大部分现役军队派往乌克兰,也没有动员他的300万预备役部队。 普京需要迅速加大力度,派遣更多军队,以免他的军队最终陷入西进的漫长困境。

    在战争中,事情不按计划进行并不罕见。美国最成功的韩国/越南军事领导人之一戴维·H·哈克沃斯上校在他的著作《关于面子:美国战士的奥德赛》中对此进行了探讨。

    P777。 “……我们的责任不仅是训练好我们的士兵,领导好我们的士兵,而且要确保他们不犯错误,尽可能地保护他们免受错误和错误的影响,一旦犯了错误,它们必须被揭露、批评、识别并采取补救行动。”

    还有P373。 – 德国 1960-62:
    “在一次秘密侦察中,我们遇到了四名年轻的西德军官。他们没有研究未来的战争立场。他们甚至没有值班。他们是四名完全职业化的休假军人,他们利用休假时间在之前的战斗场地上进行学习。善于反思。他们对当兵事业有着浓厚的兴趣……”

    美国伟大实业家亨利·福特的《我的生活和工作》也遵循同样的思路。

    P106 “……在方法中投入更多的脑力,更多的脑力,更多的脑力——把事情做得比以前更好……”

    俄罗斯人并不以战争中的反思和适应而闻名,但当他们开始研究并从失败中吸取教训时,他们就会取得巨大的成果。例如土星行动 1942-43。

    这不仅仅是增兵的问题。

    • 谢谢: SeekerofthePresence
    • 回复: @Wokechoke
  79. 还有一点是,只要俄罗斯将战争限制在东南部,并且我们向乌克兰人支付发动战争的费用,乌克兰人就会继续战斗。

    否则他们还能怎么做呢?未经我们批准而与他们讲和,对他们来说将造成经济上的灾难。

  80. Herald 说:
    @Realist

    俄罗斯表示,其 SMO 的主要目标之一是使乌克兰非军事化,而这似乎是它正在做的事情。 SMO 持续的时间越长,乌克兰的非军事化程度就越高。 乌克兰唯一的选择是按照俄罗斯的条件投降。

    • 回复: @Realist
  81. @Anon

    根据他的历史,你会认为他很容易被情报机构控制,也许这就是这里发生的事情?

    一旦 kompromat 一旦公开,它就失去了所有的用处。

    妥协的人遵守是为了 防止 该出版物 kompromat;一旦事情“公开”(尤其是当事情变得像里特的轻率行为一样引人注目时),他们的手就被解放了。

    控制爱泼斯坦的人并没有把比尔·克林顿和埃胡德·巴拉克关进监狱;他们只是把比尔·克林顿和埃胡德·巴拉克关进监狱。他们没有向媒体泄露这段录像。他们坐在上面,所以它仍然有用。这就是运行一个合适的蜜罐的方式。

    里特被引诱陷入了杰弗里·图宾式的在镜头前手淫的白痴行为——而考虑到诺米人(电视观众)的好色,他本应该知道对这种性质的任何事情保持警惕。

    对我来说这表明 令人难以置信 判断力差——与 背叛我们,为了让自己的鸡巴湿透,她损害了整个美国情报机构……和一个在她最好的日子里可能只有 6 岁的人。

    我们也许必须考虑的事情是,里特接到了一个电话,有人告诉他,如果他不改变态度,他们就会因为一些尚未披露的不幸事件而把他打成一团。

  82. 帕维尔·克雷格·罗伯茨基也许是对的。与西方打交道,不能半途而废。你必须全力以赴。

  83. Leethal 说:

    为什么他改变了他的评价? 像所有的共产主义者一样,他们对自己的假设不符合现实。

    • 回复: @Peter Rabbit
  84. @Using the Search Function

    我也注意到了这一点。我还没有在任何地方看到乌克兰的成功反攻。乌克兰在顿巴斯显然每天损失 500-700 人。俄罗斯确实像里特所说的那样软弱,但仍然受到顿巴斯充满俄罗斯族这一事实的部分限制。我怀疑,如果俄罗斯被迫摘下手套并进入战争状态,他们的攻势会突然加快得多。俄罗斯不会允许自己被击败,如果他们认为有必要,他们将根据需要升级。我认为由于西方的宣传,我们都变得太害怕了,因为任何有正义感的人都希望俄罗斯获胜。我是乌克兰裔加拿大人,我希望俄罗斯获胜。当乌克兰和北约在训练和分配武器方面更喜欢纳粹营时,我对部落的忠诚就停止了。此外,我确信俄罗斯正在计划在必要时发动更大规模的战争,情况很可能就是这样。俄罗斯仍有超过 900,000 万训练有素的预备役军人,可以在必要时保护顿巴斯营。

    • 同意: Truth Vigilante
  85. Realist 说:
    @Anonymous

    如果你不明白几乎每次战争都会偏向某一方,那么你就不应该乱说“愚蠢”之类的词。

    就像阿富汗战争一样?

    你不应该质疑我的措辞……如果你不知道双方都损失了人员和物资……所以如果一方受到青睐,那么延长战争并不会给该方带来好处。战争应该果断、迅速地进行。

    • 回复: @Anonymous
  86. Wokechoke 说:
    @Miro23

    自二战以来,欧洲的军事地理没有发生任何变化。哈尔科夫和伊兹乌姆倾向于证明这一点。不过,郊区的扩张可能会改变征服首府城市的方式。

    • 回复: @Miro23
  87. Realist 说:
    @Herald

    俄罗斯表示,其 SMO 的主要目标之一是使乌克兰非军事化,而这似乎是它正在做的事情。 SMO 持续的时间越长,乌克兰的非军事化程度就越高。

    俄罗斯应该能够在短期内使乌克兰非军事化。 战争持续的时间越长,出错的可能性就越大。 战争应该迅速而果断地进行。

    • 回复: @Herald
  88. 也许俄罗斯听了里特的话。

  89. @Catdog

    我也对进展缓慢和第二阶段从未实现感到厌倦

    一个合理的理论。

    里特想要一场激动人心的好莱坞战争,但他却得到了一场真正的战争。现在,他正被动而积极地试图向普京灌篮,以刺激他做出反应,就像一个青少年针刺她暗恋的人一样。

    很生气普京没有给他任何他安排的采访材料,诸如此类。你可以想象? “我下周将参加 QRD 节目,我要说的是,自从我上次参加以来,没有发生任何重大事件......”

    • 哈哈: Levtraro
  90. @Richard B

    人口增长总是会损害平均基因库。上层阶级从来不怎么繁衍后代。下层阶级像兔子一样繁殖。上边是K,下边是r。平均智商随着其他所有美德衡量标准的下降而下降。

    最终,上层阶级似乎不再存在了。它从下层,到中层,最后只剩下一切。这并不完全正确。 (关键词:出现。)然而,社会必须像没有领导力一样运作,直到马尔萨斯的极限被击中,下层阶级开始消亡得足够快,上层阶级才能赶上。

  91. 乌克兰永远的屠杀——这真的是我们想要的吗?

    争取和平比战争困难得多。

    我们的集会号召是驱逐统治我们国家的精神病患者,而不是驱逐乔治三世的游吟诗人。

  92. @Richard Steven Hack

    斯科特·里特(Scott Ritter)和保罗·克雷格·罗伯茨(Paul Craig Roberts)一样,都用美国人的眼光看待这一情况。他们不明白俄罗斯人想要什么以及俄罗斯人在做什么。他认为,为了使乌克兰非军事化,俄罗斯人需要消灭所有乌克兰人。

    因为除非俄罗斯愿意越过第聂伯河进入乌克兰西部,从而消除乌克兰所拥有的战略纵深,否则乌克兰的非军事化就不会发生。

    这纯粹是美国的做法。不,俄罗斯人不需要进入乌克兰西部。任何严重的设备都会被远程导弹摧毁。任何飞机、任何储存重型武器的仓库都将被巡航导弹摧毁。

    这些先进的榴弹炮现在正在前线作战,这表明俄罗斯的方法有问题。 而且——除非他们改变这种方法——我认为我们将迎来一个非常漫长的夏天。

    当然,会有一个漫长的夏天,也会有一个漫长的秋天。也许还有一个漫长的冬天。但榴弹炮毫无意义。乌克兰没有燃料来拖曳它们。这些榴弹炮的射程有限。

    而像里特这样的人无法理解的是——俄罗斯人对哈尔科夫或基辅不感兴趣。所有这些动作都会分散注意力。虚假的威胁。俄罗斯人感兴趣的除了顿巴斯之外,或许就是敖德萨。

    其他的都无所谓。小武器并不重要。

    • 回复: @Levtraro
  93. Rubicon 说:

    这是来自猎鹰的。我们假设,由 Andrei Y. 撰写,他对俄罗斯军事、经济及其外交/政治领导力略知一二。
    这应该被视为对斯科特所认为的俄罗斯正在发生的事情的反驳:

    “拉里·约翰逊提出了合理的问题。
    尤其是昨天五角大楼终于如愿以偿,奥斯汀能够通过电话向绍伊古提出要求。因此,拉里提出了完全合乎逻辑且合理的问题:

    如果俄罗斯在乌克兰失败或完全陷入困境,人们会认为谢尔盖·绍伊古会打电话给奥斯汀求饶。嗯,事实并非如此。发出这一呼吁的是奥斯汀,显然他并不关心他最近公开呼吁削弱俄罗斯。如果俄罗斯被踢了,奥斯汀为什么会敦促绍伊古实施“立即停火”?俄罗斯被乌克兰击败正是奥斯汀所呼吁的。记住?

    “我们希望看到俄罗斯被削弱到无法做入侵乌克兰那样的事情。 。 ”。

    如果俄罗斯陷入困境,为什么要取消打击呢?当你的人被殴打时,你就取消战斗。上周,俄罗斯在顿巴斯的攻势大幅加强,正在瓜分根深蒂固的乌克兰部队,而且没有希望通过反攻获得增援或救援。

    之后,拉里继续摧毁了 404 的又一批废话,以及她在华盛顿和美国 MSM 的真正大师。”

    • 回复: @Notsofast
    , @Wokechoke
    , @Sean
  94. Sean 说:
    @j2

    乌克兰战争的现实非常简单:乌克兰不会因为幅员太大而耗尽人力,也不会因为乌克兰在需要时得到西方的帮助而耗尽武器。

    人们尖叫着需要不间断的帮助。乌克兰很可能会变得难以控制。

    亲俄分析人士只有一个希望:俄罗斯将在六月初发动大规模进攻

    一直有反俄前西方军官分析人士预测俄罗斯将发动闪电战,称俄罗斯仍打算征服整个乌克兰ECT、ECT。

    还是有一定技术优势的

    这就是为什么俄罗斯陆军电子战负责人最近和他的总部人员一起被炸毁的原因。为什么俄罗斯飞机的驾驶舱里装有 GPS 设备,为什么他们的士兵不断偷窃洗衣机、烘干机,甚至厕所。

    如果俄罗斯受到攻击那就不一样了,但北约并没有攻击俄罗斯,也无意让俄罗斯流血。无非是想消除俄罗斯侵略邻国的意愿和实力。

    一个缺乏进攻能力的国家在国内外都不再受到重视。

    如果俄罗斯受到攻击那就不一样了,但北约并没有攻击俄罗斯,也无意让俄罗斯流血。无非是想消除俄罗斯侵略邻国的意愿和实力。

    俄罗斯将乌克兰东部视为俄罗斯的一部分。对或错,这就是他们所相信的,并且他们被证明是 演戏 就在这个信念上。

    战争不会永远持续下去,也不会持续几年,乌克兰也不会同意停火,因为这只会给俄罗斯时间重建军队。

    乌克兰正在把俄罗斯人打得落花流水,我们别再否认了。

    俄罗斯军方对这场战争不再满意。这对普京的帮派意味着什么,我们拭目以待。

    我怀疑幸存的俄罗斯将军对中央情报局/乌克兰针对俄罗斯将军的暗杀计划感到高兴。

  95. RegretLeft 说:

    关于:38 里特说,如果芬兰加入北约,芬兰就完蛋了(字面意思!——“现代国家就会被毁灭”)。他是在 14 月 XNUMX 日星期六说的

    以下是路透社 16 月 XNUMX 日星期一的报道:

    “普京没有看到北约扩张的威胁,警告不要加强军事建设”)

    (他指的是瑞典和芬兰“称北约北欧成员国‘没问题’”

    https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russia-calls-finland-sweden-joining-nato-mistake-with-far-reaching-consequences-2022-05-16/

    啊?! - 有人可以帮我从这里出去吗? – 我不明白。

    • 回复: @peterAUS
  96. Herald 说:
    @Realist

    这不是美国所知道的战争,因此俄罗斯指定了 SMO。 美国/北约花了至少六年的时间来加强乌克兰军队,按照他们自己的标准,使其成为一支非常强大的战斗力量,但仍然被一支相当适度的明显有能力的俄罗斯军队和规模较小但显然非常有能力的LDNR部队。 俄罗斯不需要甚至不想太快地完成这种磨削行动,因为它每天都在继续,乌克兰军队正在被进一步粉碎。

    • 回复: @Realist
  97. Notsofast 说:
    @Rubicon

    我读到阿沃兹斯塔尔已经投降,俘虏交换已经安排,俄罗斯正在向乌克兰派遣 53 名“重伤”战士。听起来好像已经达成协议,我确信“乌克兰”政府会将此视为胜利,想知道俄罗斯人除了战俘之外还收到了什么?

    • 回复: @RobinG
  98. @Mustapha Mond

    由于俄罗斯人和乌克兰人的历史血缘关系,所有这些都变得更加困难。 就好像他们是一个大哥在和一个迷路的小弟搏斗一样。 果然是浪子。 我只希望俄罗斯指挥官能够制定一个有效的战略,迅速取胜。 尽管我们的领导人过于顽固而无法看到这一点,但对所有人来说,最好的结果是乌克兰退出北约,商业开始正常化。

    • 同意: Mustapha Mond
    • 回复: @Spanky
  99. peterAUS 说:
    @RegretLeft

    …。有人可以帮我从这里出去吗? – 我不明白。

    我可以尝试一下,如果……如果……你不是被流放到这个在线酒吧的众多普京人之一。

    这很简单。普京知道谁是权力游戏的真正参与者。当然,他不是其中之一。无论你能想到什么(明显)统治西方的人,你都可以用在俄罗斯的普京身上。或者法国的马克龙。或者英国的约翰逊。或者……无论是谁……。

    但是,他确实希望从比赛的战利品中分一杯羹。因此,他(以及他周围的阴谋集团)所做的一切就是试图获得并保留这些战利品。他们已经做到了前者;后者可能会很棘手。

    他会不择手段地做到这一点。任何事情都会以牺牲 RF 和那里的人员为代价。

    当……或者更好的是,如果……你尝试从这个角度看待他的举动,事情就会开始变得有意义。

    顺便说一句,无需讨论/辩论上述内容。如果感觉正确,请从那里获取。如果没有,请忽略它并继续前进。

    • 回复: @Anonymous
    , @RegretLeft
  100. @IronForge

    他也是一名多次被捕的性犯罪者——因涉及“非法接触未成年人”等行为而被定罪+监禁。

    他在监狱里度过了自己的时光。

    我希望你已经为这一转变找到了最好的解释。服完刑期后,理论上你就完成了犯罪行为。

    但是,如果一些热心的种族隔离国家类型已经“找到”了一些准备挺身而出的新受害者,该怎么办?几乎可以肯定的是,可能会找到一名假装相信这些指控的检察官,而如果里特不按照指示行事,他将面临新的监禁。

    嘿,当瑞典凭空捏造了对阿桑奇的强奸指控时,它起作用了。

    至于其他已经退出的前 Alphabet Agency 类型,他们可能一直在考虑失去养老金。或者对孩子或孙子提出刑事指控。

    这个愤怒的国家对于这场“摧毁俄罗斯”运动真的很认真。

    即使考虑到 Unz 先生的宗教信仰和财富,我也不敢打赌这个网站不会因为公然的种族主义和新纳粹主义内容而被关闭。在我看来,允许安格林在这里胡言乱语只是自找麻烦。

  101. Calm 说:

    中国计划于 2022 年 XNUMX 月奥运会期间推出电子人民币“欧亚”货币。
    电子元本质上将与法定货币(纸币)价值相等。
    事实上它也将得到黄金的支持。
    当这种电子人民币推出时,美国将在一夜之间经济崩溃并失去其作为世界储备货币的地位。
    如果美国资本家允许这种欧亚货币的出现,中国就会像1918年那样复制德国,当时大英帝国承认德国是一个经济威胁并准备战争。
    二战后,英国破产,直到2006年XNUMX月才偿还给美国的战争贷款。
    美国资本家不能很好地煽动和宣传其公民对中国发动战争,抱怨“共产主义”中国通过欺诈和秘密手段欺骗并获得了所有财富和影响力。
    美国资本家将参战,因为中国正在帮助俄罗斯逃避制裁。
    这都是为了阻止中国和俄罗斯支持电子人民币。美国正试图在新的欧亚货币上贴上充满仇恨和恶意的“普京面孔”。
    -

  102. Wokechoke 说:
    @Sean

    声音分析。

    我不确定俄罗斯是否被击败,但如果乌克兰人能够(或正在)通过炮击将俄罗斯军队推到一边,那么俄罗斯人将不得不接受他们已经被打败了。

    除非进行一些技术或操作创新,否则您无法将高级火炮与高级空中侦察相结合并存在于战场上。

    2001 年,由 29 名观察员组成的装备精良的皇家海军陆战队突击队与美国海军陆战队的一个师在 300 棕榈岛举行的演习就表明了这样的结果。

    结果既令人惊讶又充满戏剧性。较小的战术事件加起来就是作战事件。不久之后,北约可能不得不扼杀野心勃勃的英国帝国军队。

    如果英国人能够渡河并防御俄罗斯人的反击,那么俄罗斯人就会遇到巨大的麻烦。

    • 回复: @Justvisiting
    , @Lurker
  103. Wokechoke 说:
    @Rubicon

    老实说,哈哈,西方智囊团发出了警报,就像爱德华·勒特瓦克(Edward Luttwak)最近评论的那样,俄罗斯人在战术层面上受到了打击。如果英国人能够积累战术上的成功,他们就能取得作战上的成功。如果俄罗斯人被大规模机动的乌克兰编队随意推挤,他们能做什么?让俄罗斯太周给我们一个乌克兰帝国。

  104. @j2

    所以,如果你说的都是真的——那么芬兰和瑞典应该没什么可担心的……那么问题出在哪里呢?他们为什么谈论北约的进一步扩张?

    • 同意: JimB
    • 回复: @Wizard of Oz
    , @j2
    , @Patricus
  105. Miro23 说:
    @Wokechoke

    自二战以来,欧洲的军事地理没有发生任何变化。哈尔科夫和伊兹乌姆倾向于证明这一点。不过,郊区的扩张可能会改变征服首府城市的方式。

    “军队总是打最后一场战争”这句话有一定道理。他们是纪律严明、自上而下的组织,具有很强的传统和服从命令的能力。

    因此,失败往往被归咎于缺乏纪律和不遵守命令,而实际上,这些问题需要通过详细的心理回放、反思和研究在开放的非等级环境中出现的问题来解决。更糟糕的是,这必须快速完成,才能尽可能最快地采取纠正措施(适应)。军事“专家”只是碍事。

    毫无疑问,俄罗斯人已经发现,他们对现代电子信息丰富的战场的一些构想并不完全符合现实,因此他们需要快速、创造性地解决问题,特别是考虑到他们在数量上的劣势和所送来的尖端装备。反对他们。这似乎才是他们真正的考验。

  106. @HeyHeyHey

    谢谢您提供详细信息。

    我不知道情况如此极端。然而,在前自由世界经历了数十年来自犹太-可萨狂热分子的审查、骚扰、诽谤和恐怖主义之后,我对此并不感到惊讶。

    值得庆幸的是,这个问题不是十四个光点解决不了的:

    人口动态统计:全球犹太人口最多的大都市地区
    (2021)

    [更多]

    人口数据统计:世界犹太人口

    犹太父母 (PJP) 超过 100,000 人的大都市地区

    秩*
    地铁区
    国家
    犹太人口
    地铁百分比
    占世界犹太人的百分比

    1
    特拉维夫
    以色列
    3,891,800
    94.8%
    19.5%

    2
    纽约 - 纽瓦克 - 泽西城,NY-NJ-PA
    美国
    2,109,300
    10.8%
    10.6%

    3
    耶路撒冷
    以色列
    992,800
    72.3%
    5.0%

    4
    海法
    以色列
    710,600
    73.1%
    3.6%

    5
    洛杉矶 – 长滩 – 阿纳海姆
    美国
    622,480
    4.7%
    3.1%

    6
    迈阿密 – 劳德代尔堡 – 庞帕诺比奇
    美国
    535,500
    8.7%
    2.7%

    7 费城 – 卡姆登 – 威尔明顿 美国 419,850 6.8% 2.1%

    8 巴黎 法国 337,600 2.8% 1.7%

    9
    华盛顿 - 阿灵顿 - 亚历山大,DC-VA-MD-WV
    美国
    297,290
    4.7%
    1.5%

    10
    芝加哥 - 内珀维尔 - 埃尔金,IL-IN-WI
    美国
    294,280
    3.1%
    1.5%

    11
    波士顿 - 剑桥 - 牛顿,MA-NH
    美国
    257,460
    5.2%
    1.3%

    12 贝尔谢巴 以色列 247,600 60.4% 1.2%

    13
    旧金山 - 奥克兰 - 加州伯克利
    美国
    244,00
    5.1%
    1.2%

    14
    伦敦
    英国
    230,400
    2.4%
    1.2%

    *按犹太人和非犹太人总人口排名。

    Sumber:

    Sergio DellaPergola,“2021 年世界犹太人口”,载于 Arnold Dashefsky 和 ​​Ira M. Sheskin(编辑),美国犹太人年鉴,2021 年,(Cham:Springer Nature,2021 年)。

    https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/largest-jewish-populated-metropolitan-areas-worldwide

  107. Anonymous[270]• 免责声明 说:
    @Realist

    哇!这几乎就像你从未读过历史上的任何冲突一样。在现实世界中,交战一方几乎总是会因为各种原因而有时间站在自己一边,这可能是更好的后勤、出色的损耗预测、士气预测、从食物到弹药或补给生产能力等更大的库存。我可以继续说下去,但没有必要。无论如何,在这种情况下猛冲只会导致不必要的损失,甚至可能失去优势。

    因此,“延长战争总是愚蠢的”是儿戏。尝试证明每个拳击手或 UFC 战士都必须遵守您(只有您)为他们发明的令人惊叹的“快速而果断”的策略。基本上,他们都应该立即冲刺并试图尽快击倒对手。伙计,就像你从来没有看过体育赛事一样。

    甚至你自己的例子实际上也表明了双方都想延长冲突的情况。阿富汗抵抗运动内心确实渴望速战速决,但这是不切实际的,所以他们选择了低水平的抵抗,直到异教徒败类决定离开。他们如愿以偿,从某种程度上来说,这些年来他们甚至没有受到不可替代的伤害。一开始,美国把他们从石器时代轰炸到石器时代,所以这是一次洗礼。他们可能比以前拥有更多的道路、发电站和建筑物,还有武器。最初的生命损失多年来已经得到了补充,现在这实际上是一个问题,因为如果没有外部的大力帮助,他们将难以养活人口。

    我们知道美方想延长冲突,因为他们确实延长了冲突。就这么简单。他们像一群无能的小丑一样离开,但离开的决定肯定不是由于可悲的抵抗或更可悲的国内反战反对派迫使他们做出的。该企业巨大的美元成本应该被想象为一只手从左边的口袋里拉出储备货币钞票并将它们塞进油腻的右边口袋里,右边的口袋也充当了手的主人和他的朋友的存钱罐。最后,白人非犹太人的生命损失对负责人来说是一个奖励,长达数十年的战斗无疑有助于培训和国大党的利润。

    人们总是忘记,美国是唯一一个在需要新一批武器或弹药时自行支付绝大多数费用的北约成员国。是其他成员(又是美国)为这些东西付钱,并享有在安排中成为沉默的傀儡的特权。几十年来,美国还能够向世界输出通胀。这件事即将结束,但那是另一个故事了。

    • 同意: PetrOldSack
  108. nickels 说:

    从第一天起,里特的亲俄立场就显得如此过分,以至于你几乎可以认为他是中央情报局的一名资产,现在却转向迷惑俄罗斯的西方支持者并挫伤他们的士气。
    道理很简单——任何进过监狱的人都会被俘虏。每次都有效。他们很容易受到返回罐头的威胁,因此他们会做任何他们被告知的事情。

  109. Anonymous[270]• 免责声明 说:
    @peterAUS

    普廷塔兹

    你为什么这么痛苦,peterAUS?开心点。如果你的身体太虚弱,无法在前线帮助你的孩子,而精神上又不足以为互联网战争做出贡献,那也不是世界末日。你真正的优势可能在于其他地方——比如唱歌或舞蹈。我敢打赌你从来没有试图为这个事业当一个哑剧演员。

  110. 嗯,斯科特·里特(Scott Ritter)确实把握了完美的时机。

    亚速在马里乌波尔投降,俄罗斯将战争扩大到乌克兰西部。这家伙真是个怪人啊。

    • 同意: Dnought
  111. Anon[105]• 免责声明 说:

    战争党和北约将把这场战争升级为一场多年战争。密切关注北约——我们预计明年春季或夏季将出现大规模反攻。我的猜测是,反攻将是一支北约-基辅-其他附庸国联合军队,拥有大约 500,000 名地面部队。

    战争一方升级了,因为它认为没有什么可以伤害它。战争一方从过去30年失败的战争中获得了巨大的财富和权力。为什么他们会认为这一轮有什么不同?

    花 15 分钟听听参议员汤姆·科顿 (Tom Cotton) 的发言——这个嗜血的战争贩子会退后一步,反思和平解决方案吗?这就是你的战争派对

    • 回复: @Anonymous
    , @Buck Ransom
  112. Mikhail 说: • 您的网站
    @j2

    战争不会永远持续下去,也不会持续几年,乌克兰也不会同意停火,因为这只会给俄罗斯时间重建军队。

    停火对基辅政权的好处多于俄罗斯。正是出于这个原因,柯比、普萨基和奥斯汀推动了停火。

    俄罗斯表现不佳并犯下战术错误并不意味着基辅政权取得胜利。

    https://www.counterpunch.org/2022/05/16/ny-times-shifts-prowar-narrative-documents-failure-of-u-s-in-ukraine/

    顺便说一句,斯科特·里特 (Scott Ritter) 在 17 月 XNUMX 日今天的一小时电视节目中提供了军事分析。

    • 回复: @Mikhail
    , @j2
  113. @Wokechoke

    我已经阅读了里特的文章和这里的所有评论,我想我对这场战争中实际发生的事情的了解比我开始之前要少。

    似乎没有可靠的消息来源,也没有准确的信息。

    这才是真正的战争迷雾。

    • 回复: @peterAUS
    , @Irish Savant
  114. JimB 说:
    @Sean

    西方媒体一直在无休止地宣传2500名凶猛的乌克兰战士在亚佐夫斯塔尔钢铁厂坚守,阻止俄罗斯占领马里乌波尔。今天,最后的战士投降了。原本守城的一万余人,只剩下三百名守城者和五十名截肢者。其余的都是老鼠肉。大多数西方报道都是虚假信息,因此乔·布洛可以继续向这个老鼠国家倾销援助。我严重怀疑美联社报道的对当前乌克兰陆军规模的估计。

    乌克兰人手持彩弹枪

    • 回复: @James of Africa
  115. Daniel H 说:
    @The Wild Geese Howard

    坦克?不,谢谢。如果他命令我驾驶坦克,我会考虑违抗上级的命令。在我看来,使用配备良好轮胎和链条的四轮驱动轿车以及坚韧、敏捷的摩托车可以带来更好的实用性和更少的死亡。开车尽可能靠近现场位置,下车,留下轿车/自行车进行疏散,挖一个散兵坑(我从未在军队服役,但从我读到的内容来看,散兵坑对于维持一个人的生命和使命非常重要),协调那里。比把自己表现为弹片棺材里的鸭子,成功和生存的机会更大。在我看来,分散的敏捷步兵/骑兵挫败了昂贵的导弹系统的战略。坦克对付伊拉克人不是问题,但俄罗斯在这里对付的不是伊拉克人,而是其他凶猛的白人。早在越南,坦克乘员的死亡率就最高。

    • 回复: @The Wild Geese Howard
  116. Mikhail 说: • 您的网站
    @Mikhail

    在 RT 上。请原谅疏忽。

  117. 对于相互竞争的观点,请参阅 Jacob Dreizin 在“Dreizin 报告”中的最新文章。

    “俄罗斯帮助乌克兰实现减排目标”
    https://thedreizinreport.com/2022/05/15/russia-helps-the-ukraine-meet-its-emissions-reduction-targets/

    特别是“再见,再见,乌克兰馅饼小姐”部分,该部分涉及俄罗斯上周摧毁克列缅丘格炼油厂的情况,该炼油厂是乌克兰在 SMO 成立时拥有的 3 个正常运行的炼油厂中的最后一个。

    几天后天然气就会完全耗尽。目前向乌克兰(及其军队)提供现成燃料的唯一途径是通过来自摩尔多瓦的油罐车。

  118. @showmethereal

    这太荒谬了。 j2 所写的并不是已经被证明可靠的真实内容。无论如何,为什么瑞典和芬兰不应该担心,即使普京离开并且俄罗斯官方媒体的错误教育停止,俄罗斯帝国主义也可能再次崛起(毕竟芬兰曾经是沙皇帝国的一个大公国)?

    • 回复: @showmethereal
  119. Leroy48 说:

    斯科蒂是一名纳粹纳粹分子。疫苗已经吃掉了他的大脑。

  120. frankie p 说:
    @Anonymous

    您的评论及其对 MMA 和拳击的提及立即让我想起了 7 月 5 日的大战,俄罗斯德米特里·比沃尔(Dmitry Bivol)在这场大战中彻底击败了最受欢迎的扫罗·卡内洛·阿尔瓦雷斯(Saul Canelo Alvarez),被许多人认为是拳击中最好的。 在第 XNUMX 回合,Bivol 将 Alvarez 推到了绳索上,放开了他的手,投掷了许多毁灭性的组合,最终落地。 比沃尔后退几步重新集结,阿尔瓦雷斯向他招了招手,让他敢回来再次攻击。 Bivol,一个有取胜计划的人,并没有因为这种情绪化的虚张声势而堕落; 他已经完成了他在这轮比赛中的目标。 相反,他做出了同样的动作,示意阿尔瓦雷斯回到擂台中心并战斗。 这是一件美丽的事情。

    关于这场斗争的其他几点反映了西方、美国和西方媒体的可悲本质。

    首先,这场比赛的评委们竭尽全力剥夺了比沃尔当之无愧的胜利,每一个诚实的分析师都震惊和震惊地看到三位评委中的每一位都以 10-9 的比分给了阿尔瓦雷斯。 很明显,最多,卡内洛应该得到这两轮。 这等于给了他一条通向胜利的明确道路。 这让我想起啦啦队媒体,无休止地报道乌克兰如何赢得这场战争。 最新的是什么? 到目前为止,俄罗斯已经损失了25%的军队? 荒谬的。

    下一点,制裁。 Bivol 为这场战斗赚了 5 万美元,远低于拳击界的“金鹅”卡内洛。 你猜怎么着? 他们还没有付钱给 Bivol,因为他是俄罗斯人。 这是一个在美国生活和训练的人。 他刚刚赢得了决战,现在是世界两带轻重量级冠军。 他们期待什么? 我看到他问过有关乌克兰局势和加入乌克兰军队的乌克兰拳击手的问题。 他的回复?
    “我是一名拳击手,在拳击场上我有一份工作要做。 我不允许政治干预我的拳击运动。”
    为此,他们拒绝付钱给他? 顺便说一句,为了统一轻重量级的头衔并再拿两条腰带,比沃尔将不得不击败一个在加拿大生活和战斗的同胞阿图尔·贝特比耶夫。

    • 哈哈: Realist
    • 回复: @showmethereal
  121. Anonymous[400]• 免责声明 说:
    @jimbojones

    普京必须向世界表明,俄罗斯不会无休无止地接受美国和北约的狗屎,但如果整个北约都加入美国这场推翻俄罗斯右倾民族爱国政权的伟大游戏,他的胜算总是很大。并让它恢复到叶利钦式的新自由主义政权。时间会证明一切,但在普京去世或入狱之前,我认为西方不会退缩。伤心。

  122. @Sean

    一个缺乏进攻能力的国家在国内外都不再受到重视。

    对于一个通常不那么风的人(或一支团队)来说,这是一个奇怪的说法。在上下文中,我认为你的意思是入侵其他国家的能力是必要的。瑞士?挪威?新西兰?澳大利亚? [哦,是的,澳大利亚入侵东帝汶的能力很重要!]。

    软实力呢?提供经济优势的能力又如何呢?

  123. peterAUS 说:
    @Justvisiting

    我已经阅读了里特的文章和这里的所有评论,我想我对这场战争中实际发生的事情的了解比我开始之前要少。

    也许您可以开始阅读其他一些来源和评论。

    似乎没有可靠的消息来源,也没有准确的信息。

    事实上,如果仔细阅读/观察,是有的。

    这才是真正的战争迷雾。

    对于很多人来说。尤其是普廷塔斯。他们感到困惑,因为他们的愿望和现实不一致,他们越来越难试图合理化令人不安的现实。不断地重新定义目标并改变目标并不容易。

    其实很简单。
    RF武装部队的CiC在这场灾难一开始就清楚地阐明了努力的目标。
    俄罗斯联邦武装部队试图执行他们的任务,但是……你可以将所做的与所说的进行比较。现在,这对普京人来说又是一件痛苦的事,他们真的做不到。
    对于普通人来说,除此之外 邪教, 这很容易。他们只是观察和比较。

    现在,这并不重要。无论我们在这里想什么、写什么。
    重要的是,一些真正的参与者现在知道什么是 RF 硬实力。而且,毫无疑问,他们会尽最大努力利用这一点。
    毫无疑问,失败者将是 RF 的公民。人们只能希望克里姆林宫的阴谋集团也能感受到这一点。

  124. Sean 说:
    @Rubicon

    如果俄罗斯输了,或者完全陷入乌克兰困境,人们会认为谢尔盖·绍伊古会打电话给奥斯汀求饶。

    绍伊古是一位文职行政人员,与普京相比,他的权力为零。事实上,据说他以心脏病发作为借口实际上被搁置了。我怀疑,打开沟通渠道是俄罗斯利用该渠道巧妙地暗示普京开始玩弄乌克兰核武器的前奏。

    俄罗斯是一个高度程序化的国家,它不相信实际战争中所必需的快速实用的指挥方法和对将军的个人忠诚,使军事政变成为可能。没有真正的俄罗斯将军(参与战斗)敢于给美国打电话,因为这会对他进行地理定位,并且信息可能会落入乌克兰人手中,这意味着如果这是一个很长的电话,他就会在挂断电话之前就死了。

  125. 斯科特·里特(Scott Ritter)——“令我沮丧的是……据我评估,乌克兰很难吸收这种新设备和材料(材料——最近运往乌克兰的额外致命武器),但榴弹炮已经针对俄罗斯采取行动。 (并且)他们正在哈尔科夫地区产生影响。不是全部 90 个,但他们有几块正在使用的电池。

    这是怎么回事呢?

    后来,在照片中:

    乌克兰国土防御部队,由外国雇佣军组成

    资格:现在我正在关注美国/北约战争的进展,我对军事问题和美国的永久战争及其战术有一些了解……但我不是斯科特·里特(Scott Ritter)的班级,所以请接受我的评论。

    我不敢苟同。 Uke部队没有接受过使用美国新型155毫米榴弹炮的训练。它们位于哈尔科夫地区并开火这一事实证明它们是由美国/北约士兵操纵的。与敖德萨城外的155毫米榴弹炮一模一样。

    就在那之前的哈尔科夫,有证据表明美国/北约解除了俄罗斯干扰的通讯。我说是这个,而不是榴弹炮,导致俄罗斯人执行战术撤退。

    他们不想直接与美国/北约部队交战。

    他们会等到一些无可辩驳的(对西方来说)事件证明美国/北约实际上正在乌克兰作战。然后,任何一方都不会假装这是一场美国/北约针对俄罗斯的战争,它将实现美国过去几十年的目标:第三次世界大战和无数的军事工业综合体。

    单独来说,无论如何,这不是里特正在制作的一个大开关,而是一个小开关。

    • 回复: @YetAnotherAnon
  126. Eudion2 说:

    正如霍根上校告诉克林克上校的那样:“别犯傻了。没有石油就无法赢得战争。”

    到今年冬天,一半的欧洲将因缺乏俄罗斯燃料而冻得屁股僵硬,西方将如何打这场多年的战争呢?然后问如果没有俄罗斯和乌克兰的农作物他们要吃什么。

    西方寡头集团通过全力以赴在战争中幸存下来。但西方负债累累,面临两位数的通货膨胀,燃料储备不足。西方寡头可能会在乌克兰获胜,但只能在其他地方失败。

  127. RobinG 说:
    @Notsofast

    不清楚你说的乌克兰是什么意思。来自 Azovstal 的伤员被送往“叛军”地区的 LDNR 医院。
    也不确定其他人是否投降。还有关于交换囚犯的讨论。那是为了那些受伤的人吗?我们拭目以待。

    我今天听到了里特的声音。听起来不那么危言耸听,更像是没有什么大的开关。

    • 同意: Dnought
  128. RobinG 说:
    @nickels

    斯科特从来不亲俄罗斯。 他从入侵之前就一直在进行公正的分析。 (至少)

  129. Lurker 说:
    @The Wild Geese Howard

    这是假设此类导弹的持续大量供应。

    NLAW 据称非常有效,但一名乌克兰战俘表示,其中一些由于电池问题(寒冷和老化)而失败。当然,并不是所有人都能成功消灭目标。

    显然,乌克兰人已经收到了 @4,000 个,但根据维基百科,迄今为止的总产量仅为 @10,000+。我认为这意味着少于 11,000。自该系统投入生产以来,每天的产量不到两个,而迄今为止我们已经将其中约 40% 发送到了乌克兰。

    我假设(但我不知道)实际上它们是批量生产的,并且实际生产率更高并且可以做得更高。但它能否在足够短的时间内达到足够高的水平,从而对战争产生严重影响。也许他们正在消耗长期积累的库存,当这一切完成后,战场上可用的库存将会减少?

    • 回复: @The Wild Geese Howard
  130. bert33 说:

    那么,俄罗斯政府。其中有聪明人,这对泽连斯基和他的犹太新纳粹分子来说最终是厄运,俄罗斯人刻苦地做功课和深入分析,他们甚至可能扫描网络以采样最新的互联网八卦,看看发生了什么并比较西方“新闻”属于自己的信息资源。

    俄罗斯不希望北约在他们的后院建造核导弹基地。他们非常不赞成这种事情,并且会采取必要的措施来防止这种情况发生。

    泽连斯基需要前往莫斯科出庭。他有很多事情要回答……

  131. Lurker 说:
    @Wokechoke

    据我所知,大多数导弹袭击、轰炸、炮击都发生在接触线沿线和乌克兰控制的领土上。几乎没有人在俄罗斯防线后面。在我看来,这表明乌克兰人充其量只是坚守阵地。在他们的军队背后,道路、铁路、基地正在退化。

    这些信息大部分来自乌克兰/西方 MSM。如果俄罗斯防线内或后方发生了许多值得注意的袭击,我想我们会听到所有关于它的消息。

    更多西方武器的到来可能会让他们守住目前的防线,但这似乎并没有转化为实质性的反攻。

    • 回复: @Sean
  132. @JimB

    等一下,Ukie 彩弹中可能含有 vaxx 而不是油漆!神秘的中风可能很快就会到来。我想这叫福奇步枪。

    • 哈哈: JimB
  133. Ghali 说:

    不幸的是,很多人(包括迈克·惠特尼)不知道斯科特·里特是谁。他不是任何方面的专家。一个人必须非常天真,对世界发生的事件和美国的宣传方式一无所知,才能相信斯科特·里特的宣传。斯科特·里特(Scott Ritter)是一名美国犯罪宣传员。他正在反驳以美国为首的西方媒体和西方政客以不同的方式来建立和受众的羊群。
    重要的是要记住,斯科特·里特在美国针对伊拉克平民的战争罪行中发挥了重要作用,也是同谋。斯科特·里特的双手沾满了伊拉克人的鲜血。美国对伊拉克实施恐怖袭击后,里特转变为“反战”活动家和“知识分子”。它告诉你美国人是怎样的肮脏猪。
    俄罗斯军事行动按计划如期进行,初步目标已经实现。西乌克兰已成为废墟。美国和欧盟政权设法走私到乌克兰的武器并没有改变行动的结果。俄罗斯并不是为了避免平民伤亡而对乌克兰进行地毯式轰炸(就像美国对手无寸铁的国家所做的那样)。

  134. @Intelligent Dasein

    嗯,你知道……斯科特·里特有恋童癖问题……

  135. 天哪,斯科特,你是在告诉我这不再是 72 小时的特别军事行动吗?

    您认为那些超过 20k 的 NLAWS 和 Javalin 会发生什么?您和普京是否认为乌克兰人会欢迎这位小独裁者并亲吻他的增高靴?你认为他们会交出这些武器并为失去民主和自治而欢呼吗?

    我们甚至不知道乌克兰有多少反坦克和防空武器。 20k 是一个低价。可能是50k。

    也许下次花 10 分钟在 YouTube 上了解这些武器有多致命。你和普京需要拿走现代武器101。

    哦,乌克兰有一支全面的军队正在针对这种情况进行训练。你以为他们会放下枪跟小独裁者喝一杯吗?

    听起来普京快要死了,这意味着这从一开始就是他的自我。一个疯狂的小独裁者想要将乌克兰纳入帝国。好吧,那失败了。

    早在最后一批榴弹炮装运之前,这就是一场灾难。万一你忘了他们计划占领基辅然后又撤回了。泄露的作战计划显示他们认为这将持续两周。

    当俄罗斯人展示出巨大的装甲纵队供所有人观看时,您应该已经意识到这注定会失败。有关 18 岁青少年被扔进 T-72 坦克的报道并非西方宣传。

    现在有人告诉我犹太人实际上是如何失败的,而双方所有死去的白人实际上是如何获胜的。白痴。

    • 巨魔: Rurik
  136. Lurker 说:
    @Mustapha Mond

    我鼓励一个朋友这样想。 或者更确切地说,用它来描述他已经做过的事情。

    他在目击者面前受到了一位经理的严厉批评,称他有一天提前回家了,这明显意味着他的懒惰和缺乏团队精神等。然后他指出,在那之后,他进来了,他在法定节假日工作了半天,而且他并不指望能得到报酬。我说“太好了,你射杀了人质”

    在这种情况下,“人质”是工作半天的潜在报酬。但当着那些证人的面,把经理的指控塞回她嘴里是值得的。

    因此,他付出了经济代价,但他赢得了那场特别的战斗。后来,从某种意义上说,战争也是如此,因为当他还在那里时,她被解雇了(无关的原因)。

  137. Max Payne 说:

    斯科特·里特(Scott Ritter)很棒,但有点天真。

    他看到了哈尔科夫榴弹炮连的宣传视频。

    在他看来,这表明美国/北约仍然可以不受干扰地通过乌克兰将重型装备运送到前线。

    我看到有针对性的心理战。

    一个摄制组 + iPhone + 4 门榴弹炮 + 卡车 + 在夜间没有灯光的情况下越野驾驶的人员 =

    “看!美国装备还在陆续抵达前线!今天就加入机动步兵队,尽自己的一份力量!”

  138. 斯科特·里特指出:

    所以,我相信俄罗斯将在东方获胜,就在我们说话的时候,他们正在碾压他们,他们正在屠杀他们;乌克兰人遭受的死亡和破坏的数量是难以想象的……但我相信乌克兰人愿意承受这些损失,以便赢得时间来重建一支能够挑战俄罗斯的军队

    让我先谈谈第二部分。即:关于乌克兰争取时间“重组军队”。

    您认为“重构”意味着什么?

    这无非就是召集新兵——没有受过军事训练、没有士气/承诺(大部分)去战斗的人。

    这些应征入伍的士兵只不过是炮灰。十几个人根本无法与一名职业军人相提并论。

    另外,让我们更深入地探讨一下“我相信乌克兰人愿意承担这些损失”这句话的含义。

    让我从奥威尔式的双关语翻译一下。

    它的真正含义是:

    齐奥支持乌克兰的可萨领导层,而这个领导层安全地躲在远离战区的防弹掩体中,愿意牺牲更多基督教东正教乌克兰男孩的鲜血来追求英国犹太复国主义议程。

    然而,正如里特本人所承认的那样:

    '他们正在屠杀他们;乌克兰人遭受的死亡和破坏的数量是难以想象的”。

    前线的乌克兰士兵正在遭受巨大的打击。日子一天天过去,职业军人的士气越来越低落。

    无论他们多么自律、多么致力于事业,没有人是一座孤岛。
    每个男人都有一个突破点。

    我怀疑突破点可能不会太远。

    更重要的是,随着前线专业乌克兰士兵的战斗士气下降,即将入伍的新兵的士气也会下降。

    当前者失去战斗意志时,整个结构就会像纸牌屋一样塌陷。

    俄罗斯甚至还没有进入“全面战争模式”,乌克人就已经严重失血了。

    乌克人将他们最近提供的榴弹炮藏在平民区/学前班等地方。
    显然他们不会对俄罗斯人造成太大伤害。

    但如果他们确实造成了严重的损害阈值,俄罗斯人将向乌克兰平民发出礼貌的警告,要求他们远离榴弹炮或任何军事集结地。
    因为现在他们将成为目标。

    俄罗斯人拥有完全的空中优势,如果全面战争爆发(假设曾经如此——因为有很多迹象表明这场消耗战正在对乌克人产生毁灭性影响),俄罗斯人将发起一场“震慑”战役将在几周内消灭乌克兰军队。

    这不是普京的首选选择,因为这会带来平民的附带损害。

    当它真的到来时,美国和北约最近指定的数百亿现代武器将落入俄罗斯手中。
    其中大部分仍是全新的,未开封,装在原来的箱子里。

    有点让人回想起越南战争结束时那些被从美国军舰甲板上推下来的直升机,因为没有足够的甲板空间供即将到来的直升机使用,里面挤满了难民(2分钟视频):

    就在去年,美国在阿富汗留下了数百亿美元的军事装备。

    在越南,无数的数十亿美元被冲进厕所,用于训练/武装那些没有士气进行战争的南越人。

    乌克兰的情况将再次得到证明。乌克兰基督徒很快意识到,这是一场代理人战争,他们代表世界犹太人进行战争,与俄罗斯的民族和宗教兄弟作战,而俄罗斯真诚地希望他们不受伤害,并希望与他们和平相处。 。
    他们重蹈南越的覆辙,转向真正的敌人,这只是时间问题。即:不是别人,正是盎格鲁犹太复国主义帝国。

    凡是有美国参与的地方,其愚蠢的霸权野心都必然落空。

    • 谢谢: Joe Levantine, Rurik
    • 回复: @Carlton Meyer
  139. j2 说:
    @showmethereal

    “所以,如果你说的都是真的——那么芬兰和瑞典应该没什么可担心的……那么问题出在哪里呢?他们为什么要谈论北约的进一步扩张?”

    我尝试只写真实的内容。我不知道瑞典的立场,只能猜测(下面是一些猜测),但芬兰的立场很容易理解。

    共产主义垮台后,芬兰没有加入北约,尽管当时它可以加入,因为它试图与邻国保持良好的经济和其他关系,而且俄罗斯有可能发展成为一个正常国家。但这一希望并未实现,俄罗斯 2014 年对车臣、格鲁吉亚和乌克兰的袭击就证明了这一点。自 1990 世纪 1.5 年代以来,芬兰一直在构建北约兼容性,其目标是在俄罗斯再次发展为威胁时能够获得北约的帮助:俄罗斯正在对其武装部队进行现代化改造。芬兰还希望有一个北约选择:有可能加入北约,以防北欧安全局势发生变化。当普京表示他不允许北约扩大时,作为芬兰防御战略一部分的北约选项就被否定了。当北约在乌克兰战争中明确表示不会通过飞机提供援助时,很明显,北约并没有真正的援助选择,只能通过与一些国家签署特别协议来相互帮助,而他们不需要坚持。因此,在这种情况下保持可靠防御的唯一可能性就是加入北约。芬兰的地形比乌克兰更困难,芬兰可以自卫,而俄罗斯仍然需要2022万士兵才能征服芬兰,但另一场冬季战争并不是一个令人愉快的选择。俄罗斯是不可预测的。普京表示,俄罗斯不会在XNUMX年XNUMX月发动袭击,但确实发动了袭击。这并不是相信普京的话的基础。因此,当普京现在说芬兰和瑞典加入北约不会对俄罗斯构成威胁(事实并非如此),那里只会有北约基地时,这也是不可信的。谎言很容易失去信任。俄罗斯军队现在被困在乌克兰。这种情况不会持续很长时间。这次必须利用短暂的时间来保卫祖国。

    关于瑞典我不知道。一些瑞典人表示,瑞典在共产主义时期没有加入北约,因为这会让芬兰陷入困境。一些瑞典人相信,由于他们通过保持中立避免了两次世界大战,因此他们可以继续保持中立。一些瑞典人认为,通过不加入联盟,他们可以充当独立的道德导师。但所有这些论点都失去了有效性。如果芬兰加入北约,那么瑞典也很自然甚至有必要加入。有一段时间,瑞典甚至认为欧洲不会发生战争,他们将军队削减到无法保卫国家的水平。这一次已经结束了,这种天真的信念是错误的,他们正在重建防御能力。

    这里与美国试图让芬兰和瑞典加入北约无关,也与任何计划中的北约与俄罗斯的战争无关。没有人贿赂芬兰或瑞典的领导人。这一切都是普京造成的,而且是普京一个人造成的。

  140. 正如亚历山大·梅库里斯常说的那样,“我不是军人”,但我仍然可以阅读茶叶,而且与亚历山大不同的是,我还可以阅读地图。这还不是一场战争。如上所述,这是一次军事行动,俄罗斯人的目的和目标正在实现。一旦顿巴斯得到清理,接下来将是敖德萨,以及扎波罗热、哈尔科夫和与德涅斯特河沿岸连接的其他地区。

    这是俄罗斯的最终游戏,除非北约(甚至是事实上的波兰北约)介入,否则将继续如此。 西方可以向乌克兰西部投掷尽可能多的东西,但任何重要的东西都会被摧毁,所以我对榴弹炮到达乌克兰东部的说法感到惊讶。

    如果北约发生升级,那么它将变成一场战争。 所有的地狱都将被释放。

    请记住,俄罗斯人还有另外一百万军事人员仍在家里,还有大约一百万人准备被征召。 然后投入可以在几分钟内摧毁整个欧洲并在几小时内将美国航空母舰送入海底的高超音速武器。 地球上没有一个国家有能力抵抗高超音速武器。 其中一些人只有一个其他选择,这可能为时已晚。

    我真的对欧洲人的完全愚蠢感到不满,他们认为他们可能只是尝试不可能的事情,而他们已经向乌克兰交付了很多东西,尽管它可能很古老。他们已经没有什么可以对抗俄罗斯了。

    如果有人大举进入乌克兰西部,他们将被淘汰。 俄罗斯领导人的评论是决定性的,但肢体语言是不祥的。 我主观地阅读茶叶,但我可以清晰客观地阅读普京的肢体语言,特别是拉夫罗夫。 Rossiya24 过去两个月在乌克兰播出,我看到俄罗斯人的决心越来越大。 他们的意思是生意。

    人们需要明白,俄罗斯的高超音速武器是货真价实的。这将在未来几周内结束,俄罗斯将声称拥有乌克兰东南部的主权,否则如果它不发展核武器,对西方来说将是一个糟糕的结局。当然,还有最后一个选择。

    • 哈哈: Corvinus
    • 回复: @Wizard of Oz
    , @Culpepper
  141. @Rev. Spooner

    如果西方国家开始围捕这些达到军事年龄的乌克兰男子,并代表泽伦斯基对他们施压,该怎么办?他们正在发送武器,那么为什么乌克兰人不发送武器呢?对他们来说,没有什么是神圣不可侵犯的,甚至包括庇护或难民身份——如果他们想做某事,他们就会去做。

  142. 斯科特·里特并没有说俄罗斯赢了,他只是说俄罗斯已经赢了,而且直到现在还在不断地重复这句话。

  143. Anymike 说:
    @you

    现在你正在谈论局势的混合战争方面。这并不是说,战线后方的战争成本从来都不是战争中的一个问题。

  144. Anymike 说:
    @jimbojones

    一个失败的战争比喻是,乌克兰政权不能与纳粹结盟,因为泽连斯基总统有犹太血统。抱歉,事情不是这样的。这个世界上没有任何规定说犹太人不能成为法西斯分子。或者犹太政客不能与同情或继承纳粹的法西斯分子结盟。

  145. j2 说:
    @Mikhail

    “停火对基辅政权的好处比俄罗斯更大。正是出于这个原因,柯比、普萨基和奥斯汀推动了停火。”

    停火将巩固现状:俄罗斯占领的地区仍处于俄罗斯的统治之下。停火将使俄罗斯有机会重建军队,而这并不需要太长时间,因为在没有激烈的战争的情况下,俄罗斯将很快获得合同兵志愿者。停火非常适合美国:他们会按照自由世界领导人的道德期望行事,并通过谈判停止战争行动。认为美国是乌克兰坚定支持者的想法是错误的。美国可能会支持例如库尔德人,然后忘记化学制品。因为美国内部认为,向乌克兰提供援助是有明显成本的,而且它可能不想一直这样做。对于基辅来说,迄今为止的目标是收复失地。我认为乌克兰的反攻应该在俄罗斯从基辅撤军后立即开始,但乌克兰没有利用这个机会,而是宁愿等待西方武器。乌克兰实际上拥有足够的苏联时代牵引火炮,因此不需要这样做。如果乌克兰同意停火,它实际上也同意俄罗斯准备稍后发动另一次袭击。乌克兰也不应该计划一场长期战争,因为这场战争对乌克兰经济的破坏比对俄罗斯经济的破坏更大。他们应该进行激烈的战斗。这里的许多评论者认为,在俄罗斯对乌克兰挖掘的阵地进行炮击时,乌克兰人的损失比俄罗斯在积极攻击这些阵地时损失的人员还要多。这是错误的:在这种情况下攻击者的损失总是更大。

    “俄罗斯表现不佳并犯下战术错误并不意味着基辅政权获胜。”

    俄罗斯的错误是操作性的,而不是战术性的。它在作战层面上已经失败了:由于虚假情报而导致的战略打击,由于后勤失败而导致的对基辅的包围,由于低估了防御而导致了削减,以及由于错误地估计了其阻止西方武器援助的能力而导致了关闭大锅。这些都是非常严重的操作失误。乌克兰有一些优势:步兵规模更大、态势感知能力更强、道德更高。它应该找到一种将优势转化为成功的方法。当然,基辅还没有获胜,如果它不利用其可能性,它就不会获胜。但俄罗斯将在战略层面输掉这场战争。这已经很清楚了。俄罗斯在世界上的战略地位有所削弱。

    正如所说,俄罗斯仍将努力赢得这场战争。看来是想以三军取胜。对于俄罗斯人来说,这可能意味着 80,000 到 160,000 名新男性,可能接近较小的数字。和平时期俄罗斯军队有280,000万人。很可能这最后的努力还不够。这也表明俄罗斯不会动员一百万或几百万的人。如果他们用这三支军队来尝试,那是不可能的,因为之后他们就没有百万军队的参谋了。

    “斯科特·里特提供了军事分析”

    在我看来,斯科特·里特确实很了解军事问题,但他写的始终是纯粹的宣传,你无法从中得到任何真相,除非你同时阅读西方的分析并试图弄清楚里特之间的真正含义。线条。

    • 回复: @Mikhail
  146. HBM 说:

    俄罗斯的表现出人意料地乏善可陈。 显然他们没有我们想象的那么有能力。 他们的地面部队看起来很破烂,而且他们无法影响我们习惯看到的那种空中优势,美国在 20 到 30 年前就能够做到的那种。 西方武器的涌入对他们来说是一个严重且日益严重的问题,但可能是华盛顿的目标情报和乌克兰军队的代理方向让我们走到了现在。 它有效地使普京的软手套最初的做法无效。 这件事可能会持续很长时间,如果俄罗斯获胜,我看不出如何重新建立任何正常的关系,这对国务院来说很好,因为伤害俄罗斯和罢免普京是他们煽动的原因这场冲突开始了。

    • 同意: peterAUS
  147. @Alrenous

    让你认为穆斯塔法来自以色列意味着你没有读过很多他的评论,如果真的有的话。

    在你再次用自己的petard提升自己之前,也许你可能会考虑做更多的功课。

    • 回复: @Alrenous
  148. @animalogic

    显然,国际阴谋集团知道自己的不对称性,如何利用媒体对能源短缺等副作用的解读,来试探“高智商”西欧的代理人斗争意愿。

    俄罗斯及其盟友似乎错过了战略和战术思维的这一部分。他们似乎错过了,除非他们的努力背后有一个更宏伟的战略(我打赌没有)。普京是否考虑过更大的背景?俄罗斯正在失去地位和影响力,权力游戏不属于他们。 peterAUS 对冲突期间的怀疑越来越有道理。

    西方阴谋集团和莫斯科的触角野心勃勃地在俄罗斯的势力范围(即前苏联领土)内发动内战。俄罗斯足够谦虚,不会野心西欧,这被视为软弱。他们处于防守状态。普京似乎不适合这个游戏。任何退缩都会被视为软弱。芬兰和其他不对称现象必须得到解决。如果需要俄罗斯、中国、朝鲜、阿萨德的叙利亚等,他们自己的“区块”就会有一些不对称。这就是价格。第三次世界大战开始将芬兰拉入北约。这是一件好事,毫无疑问地展现了全球阴谋集团的野心。

    西欧已经做好了为主人当炮灰的准备!人口被磨成一个不良废物垃圾场就是这样。当前的(芬兰)事件,让普京的任何独立战略都没有余地:如果可以的话,全力以赴,或者退缩并允许他们所拥有的俄罗斯财富受到嘲笑。最后一次通话!我想对俄罗斯说,如果习近平确实阻碍了你,那就试一试。

    • 回复: @peterAUS
  149. 这里还有其他一些值得考虑的事情。

    我相信斯科特·里特是个好人。 我相信,从他在 The GrayZone 的采访开始,他可能说的是他如何看待俄罗斯警方在乌克兰采取的行动的真相。
    那次采访对新保守主义/官方齐奥的叙述造成了巨大的损害,即乌克兰是无辜的大卫,正在为自己的祖国进行正义的防御,帝国主义领土扩张的俄罗斯是侵略者等。

    情景一:在 GrayZone 采访之后的这段时间里,里特可能在幕后承受着巨大的压力,要求他做出改变——甚至可能是针对他的家人的直接恐吓和死亡威胁。

    [更多]

    考虑一下。里特可能是最引人注目的个人,拥有英特尔/军事经验和正直,这对官方叙述造成了巨大的损害。

    如果 Zio 阴谋集团让 Ritter 掉头并站出来说俄罗斯即将输掉战争,或者至少会遭受重大伤亡,那将是多么令人震惊。

    这将加强美国 [和西欧] 的公众舆论,以支持花费数以百亿计的数百亿美元用最新的死亡武器武装 Ukes。

    场景 #2:也许 Zio 阴谋集团在一场恐吓活动之后很久以前就到达了 Ritter。
    考虑到这一点,当他最初宣布俄罗斯人打赢了这场战争时,他可能是在阅读 Zio 口述的剧本。

    这可能从一开始就是一个心理战。

    也许是打算让里特以他支持俄罗斯立场的方式站出来,从而让我们这些反对盎格鲁-犹太复国主义背叛和渎职的人加入他的行列,只是稍后进行 180 度转换并出来反对的观点。

    这是 Zio 阴谋集团的 CLASSIC MO。

    这可能是在 PizzaGate 或其他与恋童癖相关的事件中所做的。

    是的,牺牲 Zio 精英的儿童仪式中的个人确实是连环恋童癖者和儿童凶手。

    然而,通过虚构一个看起来比传闻正在发生的其他真实事件更严重几个数量级的虚假恋童癖事件,聚光灯现在专注于这些更新的、看似更令人震惊的事件。

    它在聊天论坛中被普通的 sayanim 提升为王国,一些由 Zio 资助的精美视频开始充斥 YouTube 和其他地方。

    然后,在一段时间内,Zio 阴谋集团安排了一些所谓的精锐调查记者团队来调查上述恋童癖团伙,他们强调证明这是一个骗局(当然,这将是一个骗局,因为 Zio 阴谋集团策划了上述骗局首先)。

    底线:如果 Zio 阴谋集团能让你以一种方式思考,并相信所说的可怕罪行正在发生,但后来被强烈反驳,最终结果是:

    如果这起事件,看似最引人注目、最广为人知的恋童癖或虚假旗帜或对肯尼迪死亡的解释等的例子,被证实是错误的,那么愚昧的群众就会认为所有针对齐奥精英的阴谋论/指控都只是胡言乱语。反犹太主义者。

    归根结底,不信任任何人。

    自己分析事情。 犹太复国主义高利贷银行卡特尔(又名 Zio 阴谋集团)拥有数倍于美国 GDP 的金融资产(并且可以通过他们对美联储、英格兰银行、欧洲央行等的所有权/控制权,通过关键一击以数字方式创造数万亿美元)。

    您可以肯定,他们毫不犹豫地使用数百亿美元来编排像 Covid 和人为全球变暖心理学这样的头脑风暴,仅举两个例子。

    这就是 Zio 阴谋集团一直在做的事情。

    它像呼吸一样撒谎和操纵我们。

    • 回复: @Joe Levantine
  150. @meamjojo

    Me_am_ju_ju 写道:

    不见得。 普京似乎在临终前和/或将被政变推翻。

    似乎 ju_ju 人知道一些内部信息,这些信息是从他当地犹太教堂的一些关系密切的人那里收集到的。

    如果普京确实生病了或患有某种快速作用的癌症(就像中央情报局资助的内部人员在他的食物/饮料中放入一些最先进的致癌物后乌戈·查韦斯那样),那么我们肯定会知道* ju_ju 人是齐奥渎职帝国的一部分。
    (*目前我们只有 98% 确定)。

    那么ju_ju先生,您对普京的健康状况到底了解多少?

    你为什么不坦白并正式告诉UR评论员我们长期以来对你的怀疑呢?

  151. RZ 说:

    我相信斯科特·里特是最优秀的战争分析专家之一。当然,当他暗示冲突即将发生巨大变化时,这真是令人不安。

  152. @anonymous

    他说的是“一百万人”,而不是“一百万人”。

    由于每个身强力壮的乌克兰人都已经被征召入伍或越过边界,
    ——这只意味着一件事:

    .. 巴布什卡军队。

  153. GMC 说:

    当我听到那些 155 穿越基辅并进入现场时,我有点惊讶。除非俄罗斯计划从长远来看没收它们,否则这是一个大错误。越南展示了当政治家卷入战争并阻止军队进入其他国家以停止供应时会发生什么。

    波兰/西乌克兰就是一个完美的例子,如果重型武器的流动以及北约人员操作这些武器并利用美国卫星技术袭击俄罗斯地点的问题不尽快得到解决,我们可能会陷入一场长期冲突。所以 X Jar Head 是正确的。

  154. JamesinNM 说:

    终审判决时,天台上高呼真相,一切邪恶都将遭受二次死亡,永远燃烧。 俄罗斯有足够的证据证明针对美国和其他国家的生物武器违反了国际法,可以设立法庭。 亲爱的上帝,现在就消灭邪恶吧。

  155. 然后前往芬兰??!!如果里特说他疯了。它否定了其余的一切。

  156. @Sean

    哦,天哪——他们把标有“肖恩”的岩石翻了过来,它就滑了出来。你去了哪里啊?在基辅,为埃伦斯基提供建议并帮助他磨练钢琴技巧?在伦敦向 BoJo 提供有关撤退到的最佳和最深的防空洞的建议?很高兴看到你对新纳粹分子的热爱还没有平息。

  157. MSMedia 由北约 (Nato) 领导;所以任何“新闻”都是胡言乱语;支持假犹太克莱恩。
    好消息:俄罗斯正在获胜,犹太美国和鬣狗正在失败。
    俄罗斯军队正在绕过敌方城市和防御地区以避免损失。
    如果存在阻力,射频就会与火炮和飞机一起工作,直到阻力最小。然后 RF 进去,清理干净,然后继续。现在的典型证明:Azovstal。
    美国正在失败。
    美国一向比较松散。
    小偷和杀人犯总是比较松散的。

  158. @HeyHeyHey

    至少这表明这些乌克兰纳粹分子到底有多么疯狂和邪恶。

  159. Levtraro 说:
    @Here Be Dragon

    我认为俄罗斯人将占领整个乌克兰,直至与波兰、罗马尼亚和摩尔多瓦接壤的边境。他们只是分阶段进行并始终隐藏(maskirovka)他们的真实意图。利沃夫的雕像将在电视黄金时段被拆除,难民涌入欧盟将是二战以来从未见过的。北约和俄罗斯都将沿着这一边界部署可携带核弹头的导弹,当然是出于防御目的。北约和俄罗斯军队将在敌对地区之间有史以来最长的边界上近距离对峙。欧洲(包括莫斯科和圣彼得堡、赫尔辛基和斯德哥尔摩)和美国将成为人类短暂历史上最大的杀戮场,数以亿计的人接受几百万开尔文的晒黑,或者他们会谈论并发现他们可以毕竟是朋友了,不用担心,我们去聚会吧。

  160. @meamjojo

    Me_am_ju_ju 写道:

    是的先生。 Puuty,与最好的人混在一起,你就会与其他人一起堕落。

    是否有一个我不知道的新参与者加入了这场战争?

    上次我听说,俄罗斯正在面对最糟糕的国家之一。即:乌克兰的可萨犹太复国主义代理人国家,受到摇摇欲坠的美国军队和美国政府的援助和教唆(用保罗·克雷格·罗伯茨的话说,这就是同一支军队):

    在近20年的冲突中,我们无法击败阿富汗境内数千名轻武装的塔利班分子。

  161. 我的解读是 Mr.Ritter 在他早期的分析中对 RF 过于乐观,所以现在他不得不回溯,但他现在过于悲观了。

    RF 投入的兵力比 Ukr 少,IMO 一直在放慢速度,主要是为了避免在希望成功并入 RF 的顿巴斯地区造成平民伤亡。

    RF 的既定计划是从 ukronazis 中拯救顿巴斯人民,如果他们的行动杀死了太多平民,那将是失败的。 RF 还必须应对 Ukronazis/AFU 采用的长达 8 年的壕沟、防御工事、人盾战术和劫持人质战术。

    像这样,当 RF 最终从纳粹手中清除顿巴斯时,它将得到平民的全力支持。 RF 研究了美国如何在伊拉克和阿富汗失败,它知道您不仅必须赢得战斗,还必须赢得之后的胜利。 因此,即使布兰登将越来越多的武器注入 Ukr,RF 也别无选择,只能放慢速度。

    看看赫尔松和马里乌波尔,这些城市已经是 RF 的一部分。

    清除顿巴斯以及哈尔科夫和敖德萨后,RF 不会再慢了,因为他们不想将基辅和 Lyiv 带入 RF。 他们认为他们不能成功地控制西乌克。 因此,RF 只会在军事上摧毁乌克兰西部,而很少考虑平民伤亡。

    他们将轰炸西方的 Ukr 平地,杀死 Z-boy 并杀死他的 Arestobitch。

    假设 RF 会像 Donbass 一样接近 Kyiv 和 Lyiv,这是一种妄想,奇怪的是分析师认为这种方法会是相同的。 它不会。 RF 经常做分析师没有预料到的事情。

    Ukr 就在 RF 的隔壁。 RF 永远不会失败,它可能需要时间。 会犯错误,会有损失,但RF会占上风。

    1967年越南战争中,美国航空母舰福瑞斯特号被炸毁烧毁,这样的事故发生在战争中。 美国只能给 RF 带来问题,但可能无法阻止 RF 最终实现其目标。

    美国认为 RF 会失败,因为美国在伊拉克、阿富汗、叙利亚、利比亚、也门、越南、韩国惨败。

    布兰登认为普京正在失败,“他没有下坡路”。

    这就像特朗普认为 Covid-19 什么都不是,或者可以通过将漂白剂注入一个人的静脉来治愈一样妄想。

    普京才刚刚开始。 SMO 很可能最终会取得艰苦的成功。

    仅仅因为美国每次都失败,并不意味着俄罗斯、中国或伊朗都会失败。

    • 同意: Robjil
  162. 拉夫罗夫:美国正在领导一场针对俄罗斯的混合战争。
    错误。
    犹太人正在进行最后的尝试,以征服他尚未完全控制的世界。
    犹太人对俄罗斯的孤立惨遭失败——世界上大多数人拒绝并且越来越拒绝追随美国、以色列和梵蒂冈。
    等到金砖国家开始变得刺痛,给邪恶的西方自己的药。哈利路亚。

  163. Anonymous[661]• 免责声明 说:
    @meamjojo

    来自(((通常的嫌疑人)))的假新闻,其媒体卡特尔轰炸西方,不断报道金正恩临终。

  164. @peterAUS

    你写:

    RF 在乌克兰东部没有获胜。它沿着一个轴线缓慢而痛苦地前进(在此过程中失去人员和物资),同时,沿着另一轴线失去领土……。
    ……及时。说……一个月后。

    一个月后,你的脸上就会有鸡蛋 PeterAUS。

    让我重新表述一下。

    我的意思是说,你脸上的鸡蛋会比现在更多——因为此时此刻你的下巴上有几个煎蛋卷流下来,这是由于你支持新保守派/可萨人的偏见,你总是站在荒谬的一边盎格鲁犹太复国主义帝国官方叙述。

  165. Joe Paluka 说:

    莫斯科应该找出泽伦斯基在哪里,并消灭他和他所有的爪牙,这样就可以砍下蛇的头。由于乌克兰群龙无首,他们可以在敌人重新集结之前疯狂占领整个乌克兰。

  166. Bruno 说:

    我在提议的新闻链接中也说了同样的话。

  167. @IronForge

    我认为最好解决他的论点,而不是担心他是否是中央情报局的资产。

    今天早上,一架 747 飞机从多佛空军基地起飞,降落在波兰靠近乌克兰边境的热舒夫。现在已经在回来的路上了。

    https://planefinder.net/flight/CMB475/time/2022-05-16T21:35:00.000Z/speed/1

    几天前,一艘船抵达罗马尼亚最大的港口布尔加斯,一架乌克兰AN124从机场出发前往热舒夫。

    我不觉得有很多这样的东西被禁止,否则他们就不会发送。我可能错了。

    从热舒夫到乌克兰只有几条铁路线,我猜俄罗斯有卫星信息,也许还有地面上的奇怪人。令我惊讶的是,该地区的每条公路和铁路线都没有变得无法使用。

    • 回复: @ariadna
  168. Passing By 说:

    我知道俄罗斯的对手是谁,也知道敌人使用的战术,我从来没有想到,将军事和平民伤亡降到最低限度和迅速取得胜利这两个目标是可以兼容的。从一开始就很清楚,如果要挽救生命,这将是一场消耗战。
    俄罗斯拥有自然资源,也拥有人力资源。俄罗斯拥有世界上最好的高科技武器,拥有为其军事机械提供燃料的石油。奥托说,北约向乌克兰运送的大部分武器已被证明在战场上的效率很低。
    在经济方面,俄罗斯生产国内消费者所需的所有电器,并为本国人民生产足够的食物。简而言之,俄罗斯人可以承受长期围困。我不确定西方是否还有那么多空闲时间。
    Afaic,除了一开始的一些失误造成了不必要的损失之外,一切都在按计划进行。

  169. @Sean

    你写了:

    乌克兰正在把俄罗斯人打得落花流水,我们别再否认了。

    Mordechai,你是不是又带着两舍客勒的虚假信息加入了争论?

    对于评论中那些不熟悉这个巨魔的人来说,他用爱尔兰语的名字“肖恩”来转移人们对他是齐奥误导的连环小贩这一事实。

  170. 整件事对戴维斯人群都有好处。我开始怀疑普京是否真的参与其中,并且只是在这个世界经济论坛的剧本中扮演陪衬角色。这家伙确实与世界经济论坛青年领袖项目有联系。自9/11以来,西方人在政治上被阉割了,他们希望有外部领导或强大的国家来反击,因此这些人(包括我)将弗拉德视为某种英雄,当他并不像他看上去的那样。当然,他拯救了阿萨德,但该国仍然是战区,美国公然从他们那里窃取石油和小麦。以色列仍然可以轰炸他们而不受惩罚。乌克兰的这整件事被宣传为对存在威胁的反应。你不会对存在的威胁胆怯,你会全力以赴摧毁它。普京应该让英国人先采取行动,让他们成为坏人。他让自己成为了希特勒/托乔德。他应该比那更聪明,因此我认为这可能只是全球大众的又一轮歌舞伎剧院。

    • 同意: peterAUS
  171. gotmituns 说:

    谁对这些“在后面带齿轮”的pissants必须说什么大发雷霆?

  172. Z-man 说:

    乌克人怎么这么快就得到了这些榴弹炮?俄罗斯空军发生了什么?
    俄罗斯人应该在这些榴弹炮在利沃夫或其他地方卸货时将其摧毁。我对俄罗斯军队的表现感到失望。 😠
    我想听听麦格雷戈上校对此的看法。

    • 回复: @GMC
  173. Hal Womack 说:
    @meamjojo

    不知何故,匿名的“meamjojo”留下了一封来自“jowjow”或“最糟糕的犹太人”的信,这是一个类似于以前的“JewBolsheviki”的关键术语。 “meam”可能来自特拉维夫或距离读者最近的当地犹太教堂。 在我自己在旧金山的情况下,这将是会众 Sherith Israel。

    在美国,更广泛地说,我们有 JAR 或“JewAmerican Regime”,放眼全球范围,我们有 JAPE,即“–Planetary Empire”,1963 年的 Dallas Jack Whack 是有史以来最大的犹太政变。 JAPE 臭名昭著,当然,它独特地在至少 750 个国家拥有约 80 个军事基地。 以以色列-美国为首的 JAPE 还吹嘘滥用美国纳税人的钱来雇用数百(数千?)像“meam”这样的互联网庸医。

    另一个要整合的新术语 = CABAT 代表“拜登和特朗普之上的阴谋集团”,即总统跪下乔“我是犹太复国主义者”和唐纳德 רמת טראמפ 特朗普。 98 岁的 KinkHenKi 三世(在 Judah P. Benjamin 和 Bernard Baruch 之后)坐在 Haim Saban、Miriam Adelson、Chuck Schumer 等人之上。 值得注意的塔克卡尔森是否已经挑战了与多数党领袖面对面辩论,这位多数党领袖在希伯来语中称自己为“_shomer yisroel_”或参议院以色列的捍卫者?

    CABAT 颤抖着,而他们完全腐败且永远不受欢迎的系统越来越摇摇欲坠。 为此,为了制造他们最新的战略转移,他们挑起普京反击以犹太喜剧演员泽连斯基为首的乌克兰。

    我们美国流行音乐,就像我们的俄罗斯姐妹和兄弟以及我们地球家园的整个 XNUMX 亿强彩虹 HuRa,现在面临生死攸关的问题:我们是否会用有毒的根拔起以色列的强盗犹太国,并扔掉在监狱下,从年迈的汉克到他们的 _Shabbos goyim_,比如拜登-哈里斯、T-Rump、Oomber、Bushez、Clinton 和其他该死的人? 在我们的革命成功之前,已知宇宙中所有更高意识的存在仍然处于危险之中。
    --------------
    https://tinyurl.com/abu4amw2 加利福尼亚州
    来自 UNZ 评论主题的评论

    • 谢谢: Joe Levantine
    • 哈哈: 36 ulster, meamjojo
    • 回复: @Hal Womack
  174. @Leethal

    恭喜你从木制品中走出来。

  175. @j2

    没有人贿赂芬兰或瑞典的领导人。

    你怎么会知道这事?

    我想斯堪的纳维亚人都是非常诚实的人,如果他们收受了贿赂,他们会告诉你,对吧?

    • 哈哈: showmethereal
    • 回复: @j2
  176. @Zachary Smith

    纵容奸诈的扎卡里·史密斯(Zachary Smith,即 1960 年代电视节目《迷失太空》中出现的那个人)写道:

    我敢打赌这个网站不会因为公然的种族主义和新纳粹主义内容而被关闭。在我看来,允许安格林在这里胡言乱语只是自找麻烦。

    UR 的评论员们举手示意,在安德鲁·安格林 (Andrew Anglin) 与你 (You) 的比赛中,我们几乎一致认为,你是扎克·史密斯 (Zach Smith),他在喷吐废话方面有着记录良好的记录。

  177. Ron West 说:

    里特的重新评估是在亚速在马里乌波尔投降之前进行的。 俄罗斯将继续做迄今为止所做的事情。 继续有条不紊地镇压乌克兰的抵抗,同时尽力避免平民遭到破坏。 尽管乌克兰人可能会取得一些小胜利,但这只会稍微推迟不可避免的事情。 我预计乌克兰投降的步伐会越来越快。

  178. MLK 说:
    @you

    “西方向乌克兰提供的军事援助正在改变局势,如果俄罗斯找不到有意义的解决方法……冲突将永远不会结束。”

    里特这里所说的“冲突”指的是乌克兰战争。不是美国政府/北约之间的冲突,因为地缘政治,这种冲突是无休止的。

    此外,在我看来,“冲突永远不会结束”是完全有根据的暗示,在我看来,是朝鲜战争的冰冻冲突,用俄罗斯代替中国在乌克兰。

    这是一个可信的威胁。换句话说,就是美方的筹码。毕竟,无论你对美国主权有什么看法,它都想出了如何让冲突变得无休无止。这就是它自己的升级主导形式,无论美国政府用 60B 美元承诺的 40B 美元有多大,眨眼间,就美帝国预算而言,这只是一袋炮弹。

    我们可以在同一标题下提出芬兰/瑞典的北约崛起——可信的影响力,正如俄罗斯暗示承认的那样,这将导致“反措施”。

    正如我之前的评论所证明的那样,在总体情况下,最近几周降级的可能性已从接近零上升。事实上,“接近零”并不能捕捉到这一点,因为新保守主义的污秽处于“让它燃烧”的喊叫模式,而普京则用特朗普的重复“我的核按钮更大、更强大”来回应。

    制裁/金融战争对美国政府来说是一场灾难。无法夸大这给无能、非法的拜登政权面对地球上的其他国家——盟友、不结盟、竞争对手、对手——带来了多大的压力。更不用说国内了,随着中期选举的临近。

    上面的内容无需进一步详细说明,我对 Ritter 的解读是,他更愿意成为解决方案的一部分,让球朝着正确的方向移动。 相信我,在幕后,双方现在都清楚地知道这一轮谈判富有成效的解决方案的轮廓。 这轮我指的是停火后乌克兰境内的地理边界,在我看来,俄罗斯愿意限制其以换取非军事化以及与能源有关的制裁的逆转,为解除整个世界经济创造一个先例和商定的框架/引爆社邦的金融体系

  179. @Lurker

    我假设(但我不知道)实际上它们是批量生产的,并且实际生产率更高并且可以做得更高。

    我曾在几个不同的地方从事 MIC 电子产品的生产工作。

    两者都是基于批处理的并且相当慢。

    每个批次都需要对所谓的标准生产流程进行多次偏差豁免才能出厂,这是很正常的。

  180. @Daniel H

    (我从未在军队服役,但从我读到的内容来看,散兵坑对于维持一个人的生命和使命非常重要)

    战壕并不完全是散兵坑,但用于火炮的侦察无人机使这些战壕中的情况看起来非常不愉快:

    https://mobile.twitter.com/TriTro29/status/1526249160202149888

    我认为用炮弹换取训练有素的步兵的军事经济学可能对炮兵有利。

  181. @anonymous

    他们将为乌克兰做出牺牲。像你这样的人认为乌克兰就像俄罗斯。事实并非如此。他们记得自己在俄罗斯统治下的日子,如果没有一场非常激烈的战斗,他们就不会回到那里。

    你一再错误地判断了乌克兰,这种缺乏思想的行为被乌克兰人证明是滑稽的。他们不是为“政权”而战。他们正在为自己的国家而战,而俄罗斯人却没有获胜。

    • 回复: @anon
    , @al gore rhythms
    , @Lurker
  182. @jimbojones

    我认为俄罗斯在这场战争中拥有道德制高点,而基辅政权是纳粹可憎的。

    像许多亲普京主义者一样,你已经让自己出丑了。

    纳粹在俄罗斯。

    https://www.outono.net/elentir/2022/03/01/the-alliance-of-pro-russian-communists-and-nazis-fighting-against-ukraine-in-donbas/

    • 巨魔: Eric Novak, 36 ulster
    • 回复: @John Johnson
  183. 整个事情都是假的!俄罗斯为何禁止外人进入乌克兰领空,而我们的参议员和代表却日复一日地涌入。他们都去那儿干什么?是为了从以纳粹犹太人泽连斯基为首的洗钱犹太人那里拿到自己那份满满的钱(40亿美元的回扣)吗?

  184. Anonymous[320]• 免责声明 说:
    @Anon

    我的猜测是,反攻将是一支北约-基辅-其他附庸国联合军队,拥有大约 500,000 名地面部队。

    俄罗斯有 不能 发动战争并坚称这是一次有限的行动。乌克兰东部/顿巴斯地区以外的每一次最后行动、每一次导弹袭击都与此次行动直接相关。很少有人意识到这一点。例如,对利沃夫等地目标的任何一次打击都与针对俄罗斯在乌克兰东部/顿巴斯行动的资产直接相关。

    这种极其有限的行动重点似乎让大多数人认为俄罗斯军队是一只纸老虎。这就像几个洛杉矶警察局的警察出现在你家,以敷衍的“未出庭”罪名逮捕你。你决定表明立场,一拳打倒了那个拉丁裔小警察,又打倒了另一个身材畸形的警察。你会想,“嘿,自夸的洛杉矶警察局还不是这样,即使我也能打败他们并获胜!”

    大多数人似乎都没有意识到,俄罗斯可以对来自西方的对手常规力量施加多大的疯狂程度,甚至高出几个数量级。

    美国出动超过300万军队和其他44个国家对伊拉克发动战争。对抗常规火力不到俄罗斯 1/1000 的对手。想一想,为了在沙盒中组建一支力量来对抗远不如对手的敌人,需要进行多少准备工作和行动。

    暂时忘掉战术和战略核武器的武库,想象一下,如果伊拉克有能力仅用常规高超音速导弹击沉第六舰队的每艘舰艇,摧毁发起行动的每个空军基地、每个前沿作战基地等……在冲突的第一个小时、第一分钟。

    在与俄罗斯进行常规战争的最初几个小时,北约可能会遭受凡尔登战役的损失。我说的是凡尔登整整 9 个月的战斗。

    • 谢谢: showmethereal
    • 回复: @The Wild Geese Howard
  185. 北约国家包括大约 XNUMX 亿人口和全球财富的大部分……他们对乌克兰的支持似乎完全基于乌克兰人与他们碰巧拥有的任何东西进行斗争的条件。 他们不需要把人留在家里经营工厂或照料田地……Woke Woke West 将为他们提供食物、燃料和他们可能需要的任何其他东西,前提是如果所有乌克兰人都被杀,即使是 XNUMX 岁坐在轮椅上的老巴布贾和青春期前的女孩将手持步枪蹒跚地穿过废墟,为操作高科技武器的西方专家提供基本支持,这些武器也是免费提供的,以及必要的“sodjers”。

    这不是关于乌克兰,而是关于一劳永逸地分裂和瓜分俄罗斯。 战争不会在多涅兹克或卢甘斯克结束,而只会在莫斯科及更远的地方结束。

    中国人也很可能在球拍中……他们对半导体生产的奇怪限制“因为环境问题”(我什至不知道有一个中文单词,因为中国人曾经是可以想象的最鲁莽的人! ) 正在给俄罗斯人带来大量问题。 是的,众所周知,由于台湾、贸易关税和法轮功之类的原因,西方和中国之间有很多银背关系……但中国人很狡猾,很清楚你可以在某些问题上与某人争吵并在其他人身上支持他,而这种歧视最终可能会得到回报。 我怀疑他们是被承诺免费进入西伯利亚气田的,如果一切顺利的话,也许还可以谈判台湾的地位。

    普京似乎完全搞砸了,要么低估了西方摧毁俄罗斯的决心,要么——我认为更有可能——期望中国人(应该是高智商的人,并且在与俄罗斯打交道方面有丰富的经验) anglosphere) 将足够聪明地看穿这个诡计,因为很明显,战后西方不会兑现其承诺(因为它永远不会兑现)。

    它将以俄罗斯被有效消灭,乌克兰酷儿共和国被提升为东欧阿尔法黑猩猩的地位而结束,中国人被皇室激怒,彩虹帝国处于如此强大的地位,它不必担心什么中国可能会。 途中将有数百万人死亡,其中一些肯定是黑人,是的,甚至可能(可怕的话语) 死基佬或变性人,但是,好吧,你看,这一切都是为了更大的迪克或更大的利益或其他什么,所以即使是天生的贵族也必须做出牺牲。 肛交世界必须是安全的!

    • 哈哈: Mike Tre
    • 巨魔: Eric Novak
    • 回复: @Kurt Knispel
  186. 看看宣传的力量

    对乌克兰的媒体审查如此全面,以至于无法区分真相和谎言。 为什么相信 什么 他们说?

    斯科特·里特重复了媒体的说法——例如乌克兰正在使用榴弹炮对付俄罗斯,而乌克兰正在获胜。

    此线程中的许多人重复媒体声明——例如“乌克兰正在动员一百万人”。

    真傻

    宣传的工作方式是给农民喂垃圾,让他们互相争吵。 每个农民都声称他的一小块垃圾是唯一“真正的”垃圾。

    • 同意: PetrOldSack
  187. Eric Novak 说:

    俄罗斯的战术核武器已做好起飞准备。上帝保佑弗拉基米尔·普京。

  188. Realist 说:
    @Herald

    俄罗斯不需要,甚至不想太快地完成这个研磨作业,……

    就像我们在阿富汗做的那样?

    战争/SMO/行动持续的时间越长,被杀的俄罗斯人就越多……俄罗斯经济受到的伤害就越大。

    ......每一天,乌克兰军队都在被进一步粉碎。

    像我们一样 粉碎的 阿富汗的塔利班?

    乌克兰军队本来可以 粉碎的 在第一周。

    我们显然不同意这一点。

    • 回复: @Herald
  189. @Anonymous

    您在那条评论中提出了很多好观点。

    例如:

    在现实世界中,交战一方几乎总是会因为各种原因而有时间站在自己一边,这可能是更好的后勤、出色的损耗预测、士气预测、从食物到弹药或补给生产能力等更大的库存。

    没有比巴巴罗萨行动(1941 年德国入侵苏联)更好的例子了。
    希特勒的战略依赖于在冲突的早期阶段进行快速的致命打击。
    据希特勒的档案记载,他承认,由于苏联没有尽早投降,苏联拥有如此丰富的人员和物资,随着时间的推移,战争的延长将越来越有利于苏联。

    希特勒被错误地批评为无能的军事战略家,因为他在关键时刻将他的战略重点转向南方,当时他的陆军已经距离莫斯科很近了。
    希特勒是一位比齐奥创作的战后军事文献所认为的要优秀得多的军事战略家。

    当然,如果莫斯科投降,除了夺取首都的宣传上的小胜利之外,几乎什么也得不到。
    苏联人会简单地放弃它,并将政府所在地移至更东的地方,并继续进行战争。

    这就是希特勒南下的原因——夺取油田,尽管这最终导致了斯大林格勒的惨败。

    这是他击败苏联部落的唯一机会。事实上,苏联当时的档案记载,如果石油供应被切断,苏联的军事机器就会陷入瘫痪,盟军就没有足够的能力通过租借法案来弥补缺口。海运。

    您还写道:

    尝试证明每个拳击手或 UFC 战士都必须遵守您(只有您)为他们发明的令人惊叹的“快速而果断”的策略。基本上,他们都应该立即冲刺并试图尽快击倒对手。

    穆罕默德·阿里在丛林大战中与乔治·福尔曼的世界冠军争夺战中所采用的“绳索吸毒者”策略完美地体现了您的这一说法。

    福尔曼的策略总是在前几轮中将对手打得屈服,因为他没有足够的体力坚持完全部轮次。
    比赛持续的时间越长,对赔率最高的福尔曼的冷门的可能性就越大。

    阿里知道这一点并让他疲惫不堪。当福尔曼的坦克里已经没有剩下任何东西时,阿里给予了毁灭性的打击。

    一个高超的策略。

  190. @Truth Vigilante

    G2mil.com 23 年 2013 月 XNUMX 日 – LIC 的目标

    随着美国军队从阿富汗撤出,它正在摧毁价值数十亿美元的可用设备,因为运回家的成本太高。 这让我想起已故的 Fletcher Prouty 美国空军上校的一段话:

    ……我们必须明白,继续浪费金钱、毫无意义地杀害手无寸铁的人、消耗或消耗昂贵的战争物资来为更多的采购让路,已经成为'低强度冲突'的目标。 '低强度冲突'是一种可以在今年使用、销毁和浪费每年生产的数千亿美元军备的方式,以便明年采购和使用更多。”

    • 谢谢: Truth Vigilante
  191. 里特的评估太不完整,缺乏细节,无法组装和使用。他没有提供任何后果的任何细节。俄罗斯无法阻止大量装备进入乌克兰?受什么限制?那是暂时的吗?

    乌克兰东部使用的榴弹炮。需要更多细节。在我看来,这些都是相对固定的目标,可以在俄罗斯人已基本控制的县内实施。

    全球钢琴演奏家要额外征召数十万军队?啊?它们的构成是什么?年轻的男孩们。储备?新手?

    最后是这些乌克兰军队。他们如何获得补充物资、食物、医疗用品、住所、空中掩护?

    这是底部粘稠的速食布丁。仅凭遗漏是不可信的。 他的信息从哪里来? 我不喜欢这种随意笼统的语气。

  192. j2 说:
    @Jonathan Revusky

    “我猜斯堪的纳维亚人都是非常诚实的人,如果他们收受了贿赂,他们会告诉你,对吗?”

    我们从民意调查中得知:现在有76%的芬兰人支持加入北约,而乌克兰战争前这一比例为26%。但你是对的,那里的人比俄罗斯人更诚实。

    • 回复: @Z-man
    , @Dumbo
    , @PetrOldSack
  193. Realist 说:
    @Anonymous

    哇!这几乎就像你从未读过历史上的任何冲突一样。在现实世界中,交战一方几乎总是会因为各种原因而有时间站在自己一边,这可能是更好的后勤、出色的损耗预测、士气预测、从食物到弹药或补给生产能力等更大的库存。我可以继续说下去,但没有必要。无论如何,在这种情况下猛冲只会导致不必要的损失,甚至可能失去优势。

    哇!就好像你没有阅读我的评论……因为你没有提到我提到的阿富汗。

    因此,“延长战争总是愚蠢的”是儿戏。尝试证明每个拳击手或 UFC 战士都必须遵守您(只有您)为他们发明的令人惊叹的“快速而果断”的策略。基本上,他们都应该立即冲刺并试图尽快击倒对手。伙计,就像你从来没有看过体育赛事一样。

    很难相信一个严肃的人会试图将一场拳击比赛等同于一场战争。

    我很少看体育赛事……我有更好的事情可以打发时间。

    ......但是离开的决定肯定不是由于可悲的抵抗或更可悲的国内反战反对派迫使他们做出的。

    啊啊,真正的战争贩子出来了……上面的评论告诉了所有人需要了解的关于你的信息。

  194. @Truth Vigilante

    “这可能从一开始就是一个心理学家。

    也许是打算让里特以他支持俄罗斯立场的方式站出来,从而让我们这些反对盎格鲁-犹太复国主义背叛和渎职的人加入他的行列,只是稍后进行 180 度转换并出来反对的观点。”

    这让我想起了第一次海湾战争期间伊拉克遭到猛攻之前的虚假宣传活动中的一位有影响力的评论者。 这位备受瞩目的评论者是 Edward Luttwak,我记得他是反对萨达姆侯赛因的战争的直言不讳的反对者。 他强调的一点之一是,美国会与沙特政权结盟攻击一个世俗的阿拉伯政权,“在他们的另一只手拿着一杯香槟时鞭打她的臣民喝啤酒”,并且“在道德上是不可接受的”萨达姆允许基督徒享有充分的宗教权利,而沙特阿拉伯则禁止出现十字架”。 对我们来说,这一切听起来像是来自一位重要的美国媒体人物的崇高道德地位,他的口音清楚地表明他不是出生在美国。 快进到 1996 年,我在意大利的一次贸易展上遇到了他的兄弟,后者告诉我 Edward Luttwak 作为已故以色列“国防部”部长 Moshe Dayan 的顾问所扮演的角色。

    在查看 Luttwak 的传记后,我意识到这个人是美国犹太新保守主义者的缩影。 我想就像“世界第四大军队”的故事助长了萨达姆的宏伟幻想一样,Luttwak 是一个完美的心理医生,可以给伊拉克人一种内部反对战争的印象,同时又给了他们战斗机会的幻觉。

    Scot Ritter 是美国情报机构的资产还是受控反对派? 如果是这样,那肯定会令人难过,因为这个人已经塑造了一个聪明、老练、真理战士的形象,他毫不犹豫地与美国政府的官方说法相矛盾。 但后来谁知道。

    • 同意: JamesinNM
    • 谢谢: Truth Vigilante
    • 回复: @MartinHolinde
  195. aandrews 说:

    周六上午斯科特·里特和雷·麦格文现场直播
    14 年 2022 月 XNUMX 日直播

    (https://meaninginhistory.substack.com/p/scott-ritters-radical-reassessment)

  196. @northeast

    第二次世界大战告诉美国,赢得一场战争是一个代价高昂的错误,导致此后没有赢得一场战争,包括毒品战争和贫困战争。

  197. 我对时代精神、宏观以及我自己对新闻的浅薄分析:

    – 胜利日实际上是俄罗斯反省的一天。他们深刻地重新评估自己的策略是很正常的。

    – 大约 300 名阿沃斯塔战士昨天刚刚放弃了他们的一个地下基地。所以洞穴鼠一直很忙。

    – 通过战略性分享俄罗斯控制的几个生物研究实验室的研究成果,正在培养西方的服从。其中一些分析认为是“失地”或“佯攻”——我看到一支部队进入,占领战略目标,并控制它,只要他们需要挖掘附近的墓地。采取光场全息术[例如。证据]并将其烧毁/将其移交给爱国的当地人。

  198. Desert Fox 说:

    俄罗斯试图避免平民伤亡,这减缓了战争进程,这与 ZUS 和北约不同,他们对伊拉克、利比亚和叙利亚以及所有基础设施进行地毯式轰炸,完全无视平民生命,最重要的是,ZUS 和北约由于以色列和叛徒最高层的袭击,ZUS 在 911 事件中对世贸中心进行攻击,并指责穆斯林为以色列摧毁中东提供了借口,因此这样做是非法的。

    北约和 ZUS 还创建了 AL CIADA 又名 ISIS 以及仍在伊拉克、叙利亚和利比亚活动的所有分支,现在在乌克兰,制造恐怖分子的人也是恐怖分子,而且是恐怖分子中最糟糕的。

  199. @Joe Levantine

    里特不一定是一个二元的“我们/他们”人物,这也不一定是一个心理战。当深深地陷入这个主题时,例如作为一个宣誓捍卫宪法的人,情绪甚至情绪状态都会影响分析。另一种选择是他知道一些我们不知道的事情,例如。一些新的武器系统正在支持霍霍尔人击落另一架 MH17 [哦,是的,希拉里帮助他们找到了 BUK 和操作员]。

    或者他只是不知道如何上网,而且他没有意识到刚刚从阿沃斯塔利亚的某个下水道管道中涌出大量老鼠。

    另外,“他强调的一点是,美国与沙特政权结盟攻击世俗阿拉伯政权在道德上是不可接受的”,这有点忽略了萨达姆最初是由中央情报局安插的这一点——而且我们正处于让什叶派反对逊尼派的形成期。 [例如。 BLM 与 Maga]。

  200. JamesinNM 说:

    人们没有意识到,如果不阻止邪恶的人,邪恶的人最终会杀死他们。

    Ritter 支持善还是恶?

  201. hillaire 说:

    多么令人惊讶……战争会持续下去……然后食物短缺……

    你看……世界经济论坛的人和高级石匠拉斯普京和他的战争(B计划)将为“(对你而言)并非如此的大重置”提供环境……。盎格鲁/撒旦/犹太人的世界秩序……

    失败的瘟疫现在无法启动……由于精英主义者缺乏智力,以及大量近亲繁殖的低能分子流口水到他们的粥里,并将数据输入到设计不良的机器学习中。

    让我们看看我们的俄罗斯兄弟如何对待基因注射剂和世界卫生组织的暴政……以及毫无意义的斯拉夫屠杀……

    嗯哼..前进(到柏林)..

    或者从“城市”运行的二战脚本是否会让他“失踪”..最后一次出现在一个地堡里,旁边有一个乌克兰抖音馅饼……

    • 回复: @hillaire
  202. @Richard B

    失败?

    他们可以无限印钞票……

    • 回复: @Richard B
  203. Z-man 说:
    @j2

    好吧,让我们说清楚,芬兰人不是斯堪的纳维亚人!
    抱歉大喊大叫。 😆

    • 回复: @Jonathan Revusky
  204. 很多专家评论只是娱乐而已。周六早间直播啊

  205. @Mustapha Mond

    布什和奥巴马[或切尼/克林顿,但你想分析它]没有这样的疑虑。

    糟糕,我们不小心撞到了半岛电视台!

    哎呀,我们不小心对那家医院进行了 130 度空调!

    哎呀,我们不小心在巴士拉撒满了 DU 和 Mini Nuke 的放射性尘埃!不,先生,那不是核武器,而是“具有与战术核武器类似特征的地堡破坏者”

    哎呀,我们不小心布兰登了! 现在我们可以得到高达 72% 的平民伤亡数字,就像他们在 Neocon/lib 干部或 Moloch Worshiping Vampires 下一样!

    • 回复: @Mustapha Mond
  206. @Incisive One

    “它们位于哈尔科夫地区并开火,这一事实证明它们是由美国/北约士兵操纵的。 “

    唔。今天早上,一架 DHL/Kalitta 747 从多佛空军基地飞往波兰/乌克兰边境附近的热舒夫,目前正在返航途中。我以为里面装满了给乌克兰人的导弹。

    https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10570450

    但是有这个:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalitta_Charters

    “卡利塔包机公司现在是唯一一家与美国政府签订合同、将军人遗体空运至最终安息地的公司。”

    上游,Justvisiting 想知道我们是否可以相信任何有关战争的信息。我知道他的意思,但我比大多数网站更信任这个网站,因为欧洲和印度/阿拉伯之间的主要航线非常靠近战区。我怀疑是否有很多飞机在“黑暗”中飞行,除非它们确实非常高,远高于航空公司的高度。

    这是卡利塔飞机当前的轨迹。它会飞回底特律附近的基地,还是空军基地?

    https://www.flightradar24.com/CKS204/2be3e998

    • 回复: @Lurker
  207. Carlo 说:
    @Alrenous

    你的建议有一定的逻辑性,但实际上我同意“福特船”穆斯塔法的观点。你必须考虑到乌克兰政权和支持它的外部势力都不会漠视其人民的生命。通常用作盾牌的平民是讲俄语的人,他们支持俄罗斯,所以如果他们死了,这对纳粹和想要摆脱他们的政权来说只是一种收获,以便拥有讲乌克兰语和俄语的同质人口——仇恨者。当然,俄罗斯想要这些平民不仅是出于道德原因,而且是因为他们需要乌克兰境内或他们从中建立的任何新国家的支持者。

    • 回复: @Alrenous
  208. @Anonymous

    这种极其有限的行动重点似乎让大多数人认为俄罗斯军队是一只纸老虎。

    我相信西方已经出现了这种想法,因为许多人不明白俄罗斯领导层在这次行动中小心谨慎地节制了自己的军队。

    俄罗斯领导层的这一做法是基于他们最坏情况的应急计划,该计划涉及北约的统一反应,并以某种方式由重组的美国联合武装旅领导。

  209. hillaire 说:
    @hillaire

    注意:你可能已经注意到了..我已经无数次地观察过这一点..俄罗斯人和中国人不会来拯救你们这些懒鬼......

    因为管理这些所谓国家的高级石匠/犹太人正忙着将自己的苦工磨成顺从的注射肉末……

    也就是说:……将装备不良的斯拉夫教师和艺术家送至必死之地,或将他们押送上山再下山,而洋基犹太走狗则为摩萨德卡通纳粹提供军火,并压迫成群结队的穷人……或红色皇帝监禁和挨饿数百万儿童像昆虫人一样……

    小飞行机器人玩具恳求他们忽视……的愿望

    他们的灵魂是自由的……当他们用塑料包裹它们并运送它们进行“加工”时……

  210. republic 说:

    《纽约时报》2012 年发表的一篇有关 Scott Ritter 法律案件的文章
    https://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/26/magazine/scott-ritter.html

  211. RegretLeft 说:
    @peterAUS

    理想情况下,我愿意相信正确的项目;不仅仅是感觉正确。但是,是的,你提供的“观点”至少是经过深思熟虑的。我想我必须承认我确实有“普京纳德”倾向,对民族国家的方式有“最后的伟大希望”。而且,回到文章/视频,里特或麦戈文所说的任何事情如何与达沃斯和大重置等相比“有意义”?所有这些现实政治的东西都是上个世纪的事了……三个大国应该凝结而不是死死地抓住。中国有大约 500 亿人被封锁——以便更好地超越台湾?

    我像以前一样结束:“我不明白”

    普京是一位老人,可能还生病了。人们倾向于抓住美好生活的最后一点并继续前进,而不是让自己变得痛苦,就像他现在肯定会经历的那样。

    • 回复: @peterAUS
  212. Si1ver1ock 说:

    我还没有看到空中力量充分发挥其潜力。俄罗斯控制了制空权。我无法理解为什么他们不利用它来发挥自己的优势。

    另一方面,他们正在引入 BMPT 终结者,如果使用得当并且数量足够的话,这可能会改变事情。

    • 回复: @j2
    , @The Wild Geese Howard
  213. @Theophrastus

    我没说他来自以色列。你在跟谁说话?

  214. @Gaylord of the German Gaylands

    错误的肛门扭曲!
    但是(t) Gayfjord,你并不孤单:
    “苏兹达尔采夫:如果俄罗斯在乌克兰失利,中国将加入强盗行列”
    https://www.pravda.ru/politics/1709225-sojuznik_kitai/
    1. 中国低调行事,除了中国外交部长定期强硬,因为中国需要 a) 按照 Dovid 清理中国内部的西部,同时尽可能长时间地向 JewWest 出口。 b) 尽可能长时间地保持其西部出口。 犹太人已经威胁中国停止进口。 JewWest 现在正在为此做准备,并告诉其人民为牺牲做好准备。
    2、中国很清楚,俄罗斯是JewWest重新殖民中国的垫脚石,印度也是。 拉夫罗夫:他们像大象一样有记忆。 中国知道,如果俄罗斯沦陷,中国(与印度……)将成为下一个被犹太秃鹫和鬣狗吞噬的猎物。
    此时的中俄已经没有必要被放在同一个篮子里,而是肩并肩站在一起。 最终俄罗斯会让中国穿过阿拉斯加,再到俄勒冈-加利福尼亚……东海岸将得到“补水”。 美国将减半,其中一部分为中国区,其余南部为墨西哥区……
    看起来不是很同性恋,是吗?!
    如果俄罗斯和中国向日本承诺结束犹太人的占领、怜悯、Kurrills 和夏威夷(包括塞斯和迈克尔的国王奥宾博),会发生什么?

    • 回复: @anon
    , @RegretLeft
  215. @Carlo

    普京可能正在做光学方面的事情。

    你认为亚速就会放弃他们的肉盾吗?正是因为他们积极鄙视俄罗斯人的生命,所以实际发生的情况是他们对盾牌进行了一些恐吓,然后,如果这不能让他们获胜,他们会在逃跑之前向盾牌的背后射击。

    我希望记者们没有完全贬低“可怕”这个词,因为使用人体盾牌是弗兰肯斯坦式的嵌合体的行为。如果我称之为“不光彩”,也没有人理解。如果你小心翼翼地绕过人质……他们无论如何都会死。常常是在遭受酷刑之后。人才就是政策,只有非常特殊的人才会同意执行这样的政策。

    抛开光学不谈,普京不妨从正面射击他们,然后结束这一切。然后,如果亚速还有一点点理智,他们就会发现盾牌很重,压垮了他们,却无法提供保护,于是他们就停止使用它们。

    可以这么说,我个人会使用狙击手并尝试从肩上射击劫持者的肩膀,但如果你错过并击中盾牌,就最终结果而言,唯一相关的问题是狙击手的士气。

  216. @MartinHolinde

    没错。

    记住 Karl “Turd Blossom” Rove 的名言:我们现在是一个帝国,我们创造了自己的现实。

    他没有提到的是,这是一个“邪恶帝国”……正如你出色的帖子提醒我们的那样。

    感谢。

  217. Emslander 说:
    @gT

    时间绝对站在俄罗斯一边,

    你的分析更好。 除了完全承诺之外,北约还贡献了很多东西。 我认为乌克兰从我们那里得到的主要东西,即使是在这个新的 $40B 部分中,对我们日益饥渴的官僚机构来说比对他们的长期战争努力更有用。 拜登和他的一群傻瓜在口头上提供了大量的服务,并且可能在遥远的度假胜地为乌克兰的顶级窃贼快速搬迁提供了一些钱,但在我看来,这更像是一个大胖子的吻别。

    俄罗斯可以在进入克里米亚的新陆地上永远等待,因为它知道它已经获得了一个非常有用的新滩头阵地。如果他们被击败了,那么他们就可以坚持下去。

  218. Mefobills 说:

    MHO,斯科特·里特正在逐渐适应这样的想法,即乌克兰的冲突不仅仅是两个争吵的邻国之间的区域性小冲突,也不是北约和俄罗斯之间的代理人战争。 不。乌克兰是更广泛计划的第一阶段,该计划旨在粉碎俄罗斯、崩溃其经济、罢免其领导人、攫取其自然资源、分裂其领土,以及将美国力量从中亚投射到环太平洋地区。

    自从亚特兰大主义开始以来,俄罗斯就一直处于亚特兰大主义 Globo Homos 的十字路口。 (它始于京东方及其犹太股东。)

    亚特兰大主义的前身是在地中海,那里的部落居民被安置在环绕上述海洋的转口城市中。 通过这种方式,他们可以清洗盗版商品、转移奴隶并在货物流动中收取佣金。 他们是黎凡特时期的“MBA”。

    后来,我们的朋友失去了他们的陆路商队路线,他们在阿姆斯特丹重述了他们的商人方法。 当 Vasco De Gama 发现南部路线时,陆路 Haibaru 商队路线丢失了。

    通过在债务上创造它来轻松赚钱,然后用船舶提单抵押新贷款是亚特兰大主义的一部分。

    消灭俄罗斯,并将其划分为美元化或英镑计价的债务工具是该计划,是 90 年代俄罗斯发生的事情的延伸。

    上世纪90年代,部落非常活跃,向金融中心的兄弟借债,然后买下俄罗斯经济的制高点。 与此同时,Globo Homo 正在回收石油美元来建造宗教学校,然后感染伊斯兰斯坦的大脑空间。 这个想法是制造不稳定,然后分裂俄罗斯。

    维吾尔地区也使用了同样的戏剧,然后制造混乱。 俄罗斯垮台后,中国就会软化,金融资本更容易接管。

    俄罗斯所要做的就是通过接管俄罗斯中央银行来采用工业资本主义。 然后,它可以使用主权赠款和贷款,并将这笔信贷用于工业,尤其是军用商品的制造。

    它还可以将功劳直接用于增加军队的人员编制,而无需诉诸征兵。

    俄罗斯统治着天空,但显然没有足够的持久空中掩护。 否则,任何一个榴弹炮队在暴露阵地后都无法存活超过 15 分钟。

    • 回复: @Mefobills
  219. j2 说:
    @Si1ver1ock

    “我还没有看到空中力量充分发挥其潜力。俄罗斯控制了制空权。我不明白为什么他们不利用它来发挥自己的优势。”

    因为俄罗斯不再拥有制空权。一开始,他们有大约 150 架 Ka-52 直升机,但时间已经过去了。乌克兰拥有对乌克兰大部分地区的空中控制权。俄罗斯人主要只在距离他们占领的地区不远的赫尔松和顿巴斯飞行。由于乌克兰拥有如此多的地对空导弹,俄罗斯的近距离空中支援常常以损失一架轰炸机或直升机而告终。因此他们不再这样做了。由于俄罗斯人没有足够的精确炸弹(他们在叙利亚使用了太多),所以必须用哑弹从高空进行轰炸,效果并不好。因此它们主要是轰炸城市,军事意义不大。与该网站上亲俄分析人士和评论者所说的不同,乌克兰空军并未被摧毁,大约还剩下 50 架。然后他们从美国收到了 6 架 Mig-29 作为备件,他们得到了一个未知的(但很重要,罗马尼亚有超过 100 架,刚刚将它们从作战使用中删除,并告诉他们将它们交给了乌克兰,但这只是新闻,而不是)已确认,我怀疑他们是否提供了 100 架来自罗马尼亚的 Mig-21。俄罗斯从未摧毁过所有S-300和BUK系统,而乌克兰则从捷克获得了一架S-300。现在他们还拥有 60 架来自德国的猎豹用于近程防空。因此,声称俄罗斯拥有空中控制权的说法并不正确。俄罗斯战斗机的主要作用是从俄罗斯领空向乌克兰发射导弹,但这样它们只能击中坐标目标,例如固定的军事(或民用)物体。战争初期,据估计俄罗斯有 300 架固定翼喷气机(战斗机和轰炸机)距离战区足够近。俄罗斯总共有 700 架,但它无法使用全部,因为它们也(而且更本质上)是国土防御所需要的。因此,我们可以说,他们可以使用一半:350 架固定翼喷气式飞机。乌克兰声称减少了 200 人。这一说法尚未得到证实,但可能相差不是那么大。俄罗斯一开始拥有 500 架战斗直升机,可以在这里使用大约一半,即 250 架。乌克兰声称已经摧毁了 160 多架,这可能也相差不了多少。俄罗斯仍然拥有大量固定翼和旋转翼飞机,但并不像美国通常那样优越。未能获得制空权是俄罗斯在这场俄罗斯作战失败的战争中的首要失败之一。

    • 巨魔: showmethereal
    • 回复: @Catdog
  220. ATBOTL 说:

    是时候了。

    每个支持普京失败的自由主义软弱战争方式的人都已经名誉扫地。这是继SARS COV-2之后,“异见右翼”因采取事实上错误的立场而完全反对的第二个问题。该制度将此类虚假阴谋推向右翼——“病毒不是真实的”或“普京的计划正在发挥作用”——以分散人们对移民和伟大替代者的注意力,成为保守派的热门问题。

  221. Mefobills 说:
    @Mefobills

    附录:

    中国和全球南方现在已经了解了我刚才提到的大致情况。

    中国也受到威胁,如果俄罗斯倒下,中国也会倒下。

    谎言和混乱的帝国是有效的,因为摧毁比建立更容易。

    中国在维吾尔地区利用劳改营/集中营的反击方式比俄罗斯的车臣战争更加“仁慈和有效”。

    希特勒也做了同样的事情,集中营要对感染了布尔什维克主义的人进行洗脑,并教导人们纪律和工作。 工作让你自由。

    维吾尔人获得了技能并拥有了潜在的生活。

    也许我们高智商的中国朋友可以停止拥抱他们的熊猫,并积极关注自己的生存。

    像标准化武器规格这样简单的事情,可能会让中国向俄罗斯提供租借,特别是如果普京从不从屁股上拉出来,并动员俄罗斯工业。

    • 谢谢: Rurik
    • 回复: @Carlo
  222. anon[342]• 免责声明 说:
    @Kurt Knispel

    有趣的一点......但中国方面的言论似乎仍然对历史战争问题以及当前的紧张局势对日本感到愤怒。考虑到现任日本首相似乎完全是 ZOG 傀儡,你对中国/俄罗斯与日本达成这样的协议有何印象?

    • 回复: @Anonymous
  223. @Si1ver1ock

    我还没有看到空中力量充分发挥其潜力。俄罗斯控制了制空权。我无法理解为什么他们不利用它来发挥自己的优势。

    美国似乎在乌克兰边境的另一边部署了大量预警机和全球鹰无人机,试图收集情报。

    也许俄罗斯人正试图非常谨慎地行事,并在数据收集工作中隐藏他们的一些空中能力?

  224. RegretLeft 说:
    @Kurt Knispel

    而中国是否会在 400 亿公民被锁在他们的公寓里、他们的金融和出口中心被冻结的情况下做这一切?

    • 回复: @Kurt Knispel
  225. @Mustapha Mond

    忘记幼儿园! 炸毁燃料供应,确保乌克兰的燃料耗尽。 无论榴弹炮位于何处,如果没有燃料,它都无法工作

    我从不信任斯科特·里特,也永远不会信任他。 无论如何,我为什么要相信里特? 给我一个信任里特的充分理由? 我不理会他的评论。

    我确实担心俄罗斯在那场战争中的步伐,但无论快慢,俄罗斯都应该取得比他们在很长一段时间内取得的成就更多的成就。俄罗斯花了很多钱,这不是战争吗?更重要的是,西方正在利用战争来流血并削弱俄罗斯。

    我担心俄罗斯的家园以及任何国家的任何 Zio-Judahite 人口的阴险品质,远不及俄罗斯。 他们对俄罗斯/俄罗斯在乌克兰的战争努力有这样的影响吗? 他们可能让俄罗斯政府在内部自相矛盾,并阻碍了其与战争相关的决策。

    而且我总是担心普京总是在他应该果断、野蛮和紧急的时候装傻。 普京早就应该让俄罗斯齐奥人完全无能为力,也没有任何权力在任何事情上影响俄罗斯的运动。

    为什么不? 他到底对犹太人有什么期望,但他们在全世界都在做什么。 夺走他们所有的力量或忘记它

    • 回复: @j2
  226. j2 说:

    人们还普遍认为,俄罗斯拥有大量坦克。 所以,它有c。 9000辆坦克,但只有c。 对 2,800 辆坦克进行了现代化改造。 其余的可以用旧的 RPG 或火箭筒刺穿,而且它们没有夜视功能。 他们可能不会在这场战争中使用。 乌克兰有1000个未现代化的人,根本不知道其中有多少人搬家。 (苏联拥有大量武器,乌克兰继承了很多)。 因此,俄罗斯有 2,800 个,而乌克兰声称已经消除了 1,225 个左右。 乌克兰还剩下大约 500-600 辆现代化坦克,波兰有 200 辆。 差别不大,尤其是俄罗斯不能在乌克兰使用所有坦克。 武器差距正在缩小,大多数乌克兰武器不是来自西方。 他们来自苏联晚期。

    • 回复: @antibeast
  227. R2b 说:

    俄罗斯将在六月底前轰炸芬兰作为警告。
    瑞典将注意到这一点。
    俄罗斯人现在必须处理的材料可能很多。
    准备下一阶段。
    针对某些 DNA 菌株的水力压裂和生物实验室是最有把握的。
    他们会拿出来吗?
    许多网站可能被阻止。
    也许我们不会得到知识,只会得到炸弹。

  228. some_loon 说:

    作者写道,

    “……是这样吗,我的评估是,乌克兰很难吸收这种新设备和材料(材料——最近运往乌克兰的额外致命武器)

    我认为这个词是“物资”,而不是“物质”,尽管也许一封信的区别对于这里提供的材料或给乌克兰的物资并不重要。 某种法令与军械的区别,但更微妙。

    我希望市政府不需要重型军械或其他物资来执行地方法令的物质规定。

    • 哈哈: Emslander
  229. j2 说:
    @Ben Sampson

    “炸毁燃料供应并确保乌克兰耗尽燃料。”

    国土防御的一个问题是军队隐藏了弹药和燃料等物品的储存。俄罗斯确实炸毁了民用燃料储存库,但它首先必须找到军用燃料储存库。乌克兰人的情况比较容易,因为俄罗斯人带来了燃料,所以情况并非如此
    乌克兰人隐蔽且具有良好的态势感知能力,他们比其他人更了解什么地方。
    俄罗斯人。它不仅仅是油箱。让我们以坦克为例。乌克兰坦克被网覆盖
    或分支机构。俄罗斯坦克无法拦截空中情报。大概是
    一路经历不同的事情。

    • 回复: @Ben Sampson
    , @Ben Sampson
  230. 脱离整体经济和其他因素来看待欧洲和美国的军事行动可能会得出各种错误的结论。
    我的假设是,战争迷雾影响了我们所有人对士兵和子弹战斗的理解——我们只是不知道正在发生的一切。
    然而,相信什穆尔叔叔将能够在经济上、无限期地提供和管理这项工作,而不会对国内造成任何后果,这是不合逻辑的。只要检查一下供应链……芯片、半导体……更不用说婴儿配方奶粉了。
    卡尔·丹宁格 (Karl Denninger) 几天前写了相关文章 – 战争尚未真正控制我们不稳定的局势 – 当 DaSHTF 到来时我们就会知道!

  231. @Richard B

    除了 JSI 失败的那一点之外,我同意你的说法。我看不到什么证据来支持这个(理想的)结果。

    • 回复: @Richard B
  232. anon[260]• 免责声明 说:
    @Quartermaster

    你还被困在亚佐夫斯塔尔钢铁厂吗?不用担心。你现在可以离开了。

  233. GMC 说:
    @Z-man

    我同意——除非我们被骗了,而那些 155 并没有真正进入竞技场,但这很难说,因为我还没有听到俄罗斯说任何关于它们的事情。不过,必须关闭进入乌克兰的后门。绝对不能错过 105 或 155 的声音在您的头顶上掠过。哈哈。

    • 回复: @Z-man
  234. Safebet 说:
    @you

    请记住,基本的心理战宣传是要控制反对派。
    IE:除了大肆宣扬积极的宣传之外,你还选择了那些大肆宣扬另一方的人,然后他们聚集了追随者,然后在关键时刻改变立场,导致追随者士气下降。到目前为止,西方的宣传力度很大,所以我确信社交媒体上有很多受控的反对声音。

  235. Safebet 说:
    @meamjojo

    如果普京下台,他们很可能会得到一个斯大林式的人来取代他的位置,他将清除俄罗斯西部第五纵队,并用他所拥有的一切粉碎乌克兰

    • 哈哈: meamjojo
  236. Thirdtwin 说:

    要么拜登对乌克兰局势信心十足,以至于向索马里派遣美军,要么他就是个胡言乱语的白痴。

  237. Dumbo 说:
    @j2

    民意调查是没有用的。如果他们这么确定,为什么不进行全民公投呢?

    无论如何,他们可能会赢,媒体宣传很强大,我们在新冠疫情中看到了这一点,但在这种情况下民意调查是愚蠢且毫无意义的。

  238. geokat62 说:

    乌克兰交出钢铁厂,俄罗斯准备控制马里乌波尔

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/russia-ukraine-war-1.6455969

  239. @Greg S.

    那么为什么要进行“特别军事行动”呢?他们本可以通过经济措施让西方流血。

    • 回复: @Greg S.
    , @martin_2
  240. @Notsofast

    我认为,随着时间在更大的经济战争中站在他们一边,俄罗斯人将继续采取缓慢而慎重的做法。

    时间不在他们一边。他们的目标是 25% 的通胀率,而普京仍在玩弄货币游戏来支撑经济。这是行不通的。

    除非解除制裁,否则他们将至少有两个季度的萧条(GDP 负增长)。

    由于缺乏经验的乌克兰征兵部队烧毁了北约设备,

    他们有数千名可以使用榴弹炮的人。它实际上只是一把拖着走的大枪。

    M777榴弹炮非常有效。 他们还从德国获得了七门 Panzerhaubitze 2000 榴弹炮。 两者都可以从 15 英里外攻击装甲。

    俄罗斯人不能只躲在顿巴斯。乌克兰人将继续用大炮和无人机攻击他们。

    普京需要承认这是一个巨大的失败并认输。 也许乌克兰会在交易中给他们顿巴斯。 我怀疑普京甚至会在两个月内还活着,所以他应该尽可能地达成协议。

    • 哈哈: Notsofast
    • 回复: @anon
  241. Herald 说:
    @Realist

    看来你已经从纽约时报得到你的“战争”报道,也许华盛顿邮报或天堂禁止福克斯新闻,所以难怪我们不同意。 你必须知道得更好,或者你可能只是在拖钓。
    俄罗斯在乌克兰的特别行动与塔利班或阿富汗无关,这些提法是透明的稻草人,不值得进一步考虑。

    • 回复: @Realist
    , @John Johnson
  242. profnasty 说:
    @Mustapha Mond

    很难相信犹太人会在学校上课。 没有人是那么邪恶的。
    炸毁空荡荡的学校是可以的。
    如果 Z 在开放的学校里放大炮——把基辅的所有政府大楼夷为平地。 击落美国补给机。
    没有怨言。

  243. profnasty 说:
    @Richard B

    自 08 年 08 月 08 日以来,美国似乎一直在与俄罗斯交战。
    这可能就是结局了。
    一开始的。

  244. @Quartermaster

    普京也有穆斯林为他而战,但他的受迷惑的追随者却认为他是在为基督教而战。

    好吧,他试图派遣车臣穆斯林杀死乌克兰基督教徒,但他们假装在那里却被抓获:
    https://observers.france24.com/en/europe/20220401-was-this-photo-of-chechen-leader-kadyrov-praying-in-a-petrol-station-taken-in-ukraine

    乌克兰比俄罗斯更信奉基督教。俄罗斯拥有大量苏联时代遗留下来的无神论者。
    https://www.quora.com/How-common-is-atheism-in-Russia

    俄罗斯也出现人口负增长:
    https://www.thoughtco.com/negative-population-growth-1435471

    因此,他们拥有支持家庭的基督教文化的幻想就消失了。他们的出生率接近欧洲平均水平。

    出售以色列石油和原料钻石的也是普京。我贴了很多他亲吻墙壁的照片。

    据国家基础设施部官员称,以色列目前90%的石油从俄罗斯和里海地区进口
    https://www.jpost.com/Israel/Israel-pushes-to-reduce-oil-dependency

    但普京的追随者希望将这场战争重新想象成针对犹太人的战争。一定要发挥相当大的想象力。以色列将比大多数国家受益更多,因为他们不必通过制裁。

    有点像孩子们如何重新想象一个故事以更好地符合他们的幻想。

    普京只是一个苦涩的小独裁者,两个月后就活不了了。他就像过去的沙皇一样贪婪。完全超出了他的能力范围,联邦安全局将会消灭他。

    • 巨魔: Notsofast, Rurik
    • 回复: @anon
  245. profnasty 说:
    @meamjojo

    如果俄罗斯需要无人机
    中国将制造无人机。

    • 回复: @John Johnson
  246. @Justvisiting

    我找到了我的灵魂伴侣 回复

  247. Realist 说:
    @Herald

    看来你已经从纽约时报得到你的“战争”报道,也许华盛顿邮报或天堂禁止福克斯新闻,所以难怪我们不同意。 你必须知道得更好,或者你可能只是在拖钓。

    我不知道你是怎么得到的。看来你对我的帖子不熟悉。我已经在这里发帖很多年了。

    俄罗斯在乌克兰的特别行动与塔利班或阿富汗无关,这些提法是透明的稻草人,不值得进一步考虑。

    我从未说过或暗示会这样做。 我用它作为一个旷日持久的战争的例子,其中更强大的(美国)在 XNUMX 年后惨败。

    关于这个话题,我们没有进一步的讨论。

  248. @Herald

    看来你已经从纽约时报得到你的“战争”报道,也许华盛顿邮报或天堂禁止福克斯新闻,所以难怪我们不同意。 你必须知道得更好,或者你可能只是在拖钓。

    俄罗斯人被赶回了他们在哈尔科夫的边境。

    这是乌克兰人在俄罗斯边境的照片:

    https://nypost.com/2022/05/16/ukrainian-forces-push-russians-out-of-kharkiv-oblast/

    我可能可以在来自世界各地的十几篇不同文章中找到该消息。 你喜欢哪种语言?

    这对普京来说并没有按计划进行。 是时候面对现实,而不是试图责怪 MSM。

    我鄙视 MSM,但这并不意味着他们打印的所有内容都一定是假的。那是迷惑了。

    阅读您选择的任何国家的新闻。 这是一场灾难。

    • 哈哈: Notsofast
    • 回复: @Kurt Knispel
  249. Sean 说:
    @Lurker

    俄罗斯尚未达到顶峰,但一旦达到顶峰,乌克兰将认真反击。西方对乌克兰人的计划是到23月XNUMX日线然后停下来。没有机会,他们会明白继续前行将是收复失地的唯一途径,现在就行动,机不可失。至于俄军将领被杀的情况,虽然无疑有些人是大意,但俄军电子战负责人日前与总部人员一起被杀。美国向乌克兰提供了太多的情报和武器,却没有考虑他们将如何使用它们。

    • 回复: @Anonymous
  250. Chris A 说:

    只是好奇快速使用设备的能力是否是因为西方的“顾问”实际上是操作员。

  251. 感谢您提供的消息以及出色的结论:
    恕我直言,斯科特·里特正在逐渐适应这样一种观念,即乌克兰冲突不仅仅是两个争吵邻国之间的地区冲突,也不是北约和俄罗斯之间的代理人战争。不。乌克兰是一项更广泛计划的第一阶段,该计划旨在压垮俄罗斯、摧毁其经济、推翻其领导人、夺取其自然资源、分裂其领土,并将美国的力量穿过中亚投射到环太平洋地区。乌克兰是霸权、帝国和纯粹的权力的象征。最重要的是,乌克兰是第三次世界大战中的第一场战役,这场战争是华盛顿精心策划和发动的,目的是确保美国在另一个世纪里不受挑战。”

    请参见: https://www.unz.com/article/wwii-redux-the-endpoint-of-u-s-policy-from-ukraine-to-taiwan/

    保持伟大的工作。

  252. James Bond 说:

    听着,我喜欢里特朴实无华、看似未受破坏的分析。
    但归根结底,他只是另一个有观点的摇摆人。
    在这种情况下,他在左外野的某个地方出局了。
    俄罗斯人故意拖延。他们知道秋季和冬季可能是西方棺材上的最后一颗经济和政治钉子。任何真正落入乌克兰人手中的武器都太少太晚了。乌克兰最好的机会总是在战争初期,当时他们有八年的准备时间。就像诺曼底登陆一样,一旦盟军建立了滩头阵地,他们压倒德国人只是时间问题。

  253. @Wizard of Oz

    相信西方的心理分析是荒谬的。你所要做的就是听听英国和美国官员如何吹嘘“北约已恢复其目的”。托尼·布莱尔 (Tony Blair) 对法里兹·扎卡里亚 (Fareez Zakaria) 吹捧即将发生的所有精彩的新军费开支。这是一个肮脏的秘密——芬兰和瑞典至少二十年来一直在训练和接近北约。我的评论是开玩笑的。北约是一个战争帮派,以不稳定为生。瑞典人和芬兰人现在把自己当作核目标,真是太糟糕了。芬兰人在站在纳粹一边后签署了一项绝不允许对俄罗斯(苏联)进行侵略的条约。中立维持了和平(即使幕后情况并非如此)。一点也不聪明——但他们现在别无选择,只能听从命令。
    但最初的观点是,如果俄罗斯如此无能,那么加入联盟就是浪费时间。虽然你没听懂讽刺

    • 回复: @Wizard of Oz
  254. @frankie p

    戈洛夫金击败阿尔瓦雷斯,却被拉斯维加斯评委欺骗。这玷污了阿尔瓦雷斯。但就像国家一样——运动员也有心理部门……这就是所谓的“营销”。同样的使命——愚弄人们——直到事情曝光

    • 回复: @frankie p
  255. @nsa

    国家安全局, 你应该更频繁地发帖。

  256. 与此同时,数以百万计的未来政府种植园奴隶通过非法和难民重新安置,正以比一辆超速行驶的波利兹汽车更快的速度冲过边境,带来毒品、疾病和最优秀、最聪明的变异弱智,这些弱智将孕育下一代罪犯,就像他们留下的垃圾一样。
    让我们一起见证 PIG(政府里的猪)授权在我们眼前彻底摧毁文明。它不仅存在于 JewMerica,而且无处不在。

  257. @Falcon 22

    美国在土耳其拥有核武器,当苏联从古巴撤走核武器时,美国也撤走了它们。

  258. @RegretLeft

    ChingChong 了解真正的登极;我的教授教了他们 Mefobills 3 年。
    Goanna 说,有两种人是你不能从中获利的:中国人和犹太人;最终对决是中国VS犹太人?
    那些 400 mio flaters 正是教他们 Big Merica 小油炸食品烹饪的正确材料。

  259. @j2

    我猜你没有意识到为什么芬兰首先与苏联签订了中立协议。但是,嘿,如果他们想把目标放在他们的背上,那取决于他们。但我的观点是,增加军事支出和加入北约组织是没有意义的,因为根据您之前的评论,俄罗斯不可能构成威胁。俄罗斯一定是太弱小无能了。所以要么他们都是傻子想花钱,要么你写的关于俄罗斯的故事并不完整

    • 回复: @j2
  260. Catdog 说:
    @j2

    乌克兰声称减少了 200 人。这一说法尚未得到证实,但可能相差不是那么大。俄罗斯一开始拥有 500 架战斗直升机,可以在这里使用大约一半,即 250 架。乌克兰声称已经摧毁了 160 多架,这可能也相差不了多少。

    基于什么?这听起来像是一个疯狂而令人难以置信的谎言。他们只展示了总共不到十几架被击落的飞机和直升机的照片确认。

    • 回复: @Anonymous
    , @j2
  261. Carlo 说:
    @Mefobills

    “中国在维吾尔地区利用劳改营/集中营的反击方式比俄罗斯的车臣战争更加“仁慈和有效”。”
    真的。但俄罗斯在1990世纪XNUMX年代初期失去了对车臣的控制,车臣事实上已经独立,所以他们别无选择,只能发动全面的军事行动来重新控制车臣。

  262. Catdog 说:

    波兰 T-72M 在乌克兰对扎波罗热的一次失败袭击中被摧毁。如果乌克兰人能够在不被摧毁的情况下将坦克这样大的东西穿越该国,那么俄罗斯显然未能阻止北约的武器运输。

  263. @j2

    我不明白!你是说英国人炸毁了俄罗斯的燃料,而不是俄罗斯人炸毁了你的燃料吗?

    这有什么关系!?乌克兰面临供应问题。即使他们得到了俄罗斯的供应,俄罗斯人也没有供应问题。乌克兰人可以通过消耗来减少或关闭。

    至少从 1945 年起,俄罗斯和乌克兰就一直紧密相连。俄罗斯可能对乌克兰的基础设施了如指掌。为什么俄罗斯人很难找到乌克兰的“隐藏”燃料堆,因为他们也可能建造了这些燃料堆。除非自从俄罗斯人离开后乌克兰人重建了继承人的军事基础设施,这是完全不可能的

  264. Hal Womack 说:
    @Hal Womack

    我试图通过电子邮件向塔克卡尔森本人发送我上面的问题:[值得注意的塔克卡尔森是否已经挑战了面对面辩论的多数党领袖,他在希伯来语中称自己为“_shomer yisroel_”或参议院以色列的捍卫者?]

    他的网站—— https://tinyurl.com/24b7wbnu ——给了我这样的回应:
    [错误:请稍后再试]

    几分钟后,我又试了一次。 你猜怎么着?
    [错误:请稍后再试]

    哇,塔克? 臭名昭著的 JAR Internet Technical Squad 是否恶意干预您的网站,或者公众通过评论与您联系是否存在其他问题? 当然,如果有好心的读者——Hello Out There!——能以某种方式将这个问题转发给 Tucker,我将不胜感激。

  265. @profnasty

    如果俄罗斯需要无人机
    中国将制造无人机。

    哈哈,有点晚了。

    你认为普京可以在 eBay 上购买几十架中国无人机来解决这个问题吗?

    你的半品脱大规模杀人犯无法通过购买一些中国无人机来结束这场战争。

    乌克兰人已经为这场战争做好了准备,并且一直在用无人机做准备。这些远程无人机需要使用和与其他单位协调的经验。

    正确的做法是道歉并结束战争。

    • 谢谢: meamjojo
  266. Karl1906 说:

    斯科特·里特也许是对的。但这只是一种意见。他的结论意味着战争正在延长——俄罗斯并没有输掉这场战争。

    主要问题仍然是,没有士兵使用武器,就没有战争。这不是兔子和乌龟赛跑。人们已经意识到,他们的整整几代人都因为一场战争而被谋杀,这场战争只会给他们的领导层和美国带来“好处”。

    无论如何,大部分武器和资金都不会到达乌克兰。

  267. @j2

    我不明白!你是说英国人炸毁了俄罗斯的燃料,而不是俄罗斯人炸毁了他们的燃料?

    这有什么关系!?乌克兰面临供应问题。即使他们获得了俄罗斯的补给,俄罗斯也不存在补给问题。乌克兰人至少可以通过消耗来减少或关闭。

    至少从 1945 年起,俄罗斯人和乌克兰人就一直紧密相连。俄罗斯人很可能自己建造了乌克兰的隐藏燃料基础设施,因此找到它们是没有问题的

    我无法看到或想象俄罗斯人不知道乌克兰隐藏的燃料在哪里的情况。为什么俄罗斯人很难找到乌克兰的“隐藏”燃料堆,因为他们也可能建造了这些燃料堆。除非乌克兰人在俄罗斯人离开后重建了继承人的军事基础设施……这似乎完全不可能

  268. antibeast 说:
    @j2

    人们还普遍认为,俄罗斯拥有大量坦克。 所以,它有c。 9000辆坦克,但只有c。 对 2,800 辆坦克进行了现代化改造。 其余的可以用旧的 RPG 或火箭筒刺穿,而且它们没有夜视功能。 他们可能不会在这场战争中使用。 乌克兰有1000个未现代化的人,根本不知道其中有多少人搬家。 (苏联拥有大量武器,乌克兰继承了很多)。 因此,俄罗斯有 2,800 个,而乌克兰声称已经消除了 1,225 个左右。

    到目前为止,俄罗斯战场上的损失主要是 T-72 MBT,其中数百辆被 Bayraktar TB2 武装无人机或乌克兰游击队装备 NLAW、Stugna-P 和标枪反导弹的路边伏击损失。 但俄罗斯仍有 1,500 辆较旧的 T-90 MBT,其余数千辆 T-72 MBT 尚未部署在乌克兰。 俄罗斯 SMO 的战术错误是部署 T-72 MBT 坦克营,在开阔的道路上行驶,既没有近距离空中支援也没有步兵侦察兵的前沿部队来清除反坦克地雷的路径并防止路边伏击. 乌克兰人没有与俄罗斯坦克营正面交锋,而是选择了游击战术,在路边设置伏击。 Bayraktar TB2 武装无人机是该节目的明星,轻松击败对武装无人机发射的反坦克导弹毫无防御能力的 MBT。

    • 回复: @antibeast
    , @j2
  269. anon[260]• 免责声明 说:
    @John Johnson

    普京也有穆斯林为他而战,但他的受迷惑的追随者却认为他是在为基督教而战。

    好吧,他试图派遣车臣穆斯林杀死乌克兰基督教徒,但他们假装在那里却被抓获:

    你让我想起二战期间那个人会说:“希特勒正在与日本人作战。他也有一个穆斯林武装党卫队师。然而他的迷惑追随者却认为他是在为雅利安种族或西方而战。”

    乌克兰比俄罗斯更信奉基督教。俄罗斯拥有大量苏联时代遗留下来的无神论者。

    这只是一个彻头彻尾的谎言。你对俄罗斯和乌克兰基督教状况的虚假关注向我们展示了你的帖子是如何恶意的。俄罗斯和乌克兰都以东正教为主,但这两个国家都受到世俗新自由主义价值观和西化的影响。这不是他们的错,而只是美国和西方集体长期享有霸权地位的结果。

    出售以色列石油和原料钻石的也是普京。我贴了很多他亲吻墙壁的照片。

    他与以色列做生意就像与叙利亚和伊朗等以色列的敌人做生意一样。至于亲吻墙壁,我同意这有点过分了。无论在哪个国家,你都无法真正摆脱亲犹太主义的令人畏惧的表现。泽伦斯基援引出生于乌克兰的戈尔达·梅厄来唤起以色列对乌克兰的支持。无论俄罗斯与以色列开展什么业务,与美国向以色列倾注的武器和外国援助相比都显得黯然失色。不过,这是一个愚蠢的观点,因为俄罗斯向许多国家提供石油和天然气。

    但普京的追随者希望将这场战争重新想象成针对犹太人的战争。

    但“普京追随者”的想法并不重要。重要的是犹太人自己的想法,而绝大多数犹太社区都站在乌克兰一边。他们历来憎恨并继续憎恨俄罗斯,即使俄罗斯人没有回报这种仇恨。

    有点像孩子们如何重新想象一个故事以更好地符合他们的幻想。

    您是在这里进行大量“重新想象”的人。

    普京只是一个苦涩的小独裁者,两个月后就活不了了。他就像过去的沙皇一样贪婪。完全超出了他的能力范围,联邦安全局将会消灭他。

    如果还有任何疑问,最后一行就表明你是彻头彻尾的俄罗斯恐惧症患者。你对沙皇的描述完全不准确和夸张,表现出你对俄罗斯的蔑视。普京的一生与俄罗斯的福祉息息相关,他是一位热爱祖国的爱国者,尽管这种爱国主义与其他人的爱国主义有所不同。

    事实上,一旦有人谈论沙皇,就很明显你可能是一个仇俄犹太人。你对沙皇俄罗斯的了解可能是通过《屋顶上的小提琴手》等愚蠢的犹太音乐剧来了解的。

    • 回复: @John Johnson
  270. 说到无休止的战争和他们创造的所有屎坑……

    今天的课程是关于“ShitHole”的起源。

    “shtetl”这个词是意第绪语,意思是“shithole”,即犹太人聚居区。

    今天,您将了解为什么他们想把每座城市变成“shtetl”,这提醒着他们幸福地生活在撒旦犹太教堂附近的盗贼巢穴中,纵容、计数。
    今天您还将了解为什么两千多年来犹太部落被逐出一百多个县。

    什么是什特尔? |我的犹太学习
    https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/shtetl-in-jewish-history-and-memory/

  271. 至于那些新的百万新兵? 在越南,它们被称为“樱桃”。 幸运的是,他们能在战斗中坚持一周,除非他们有一个好的中士在新兵训练营后帮助训练他们。

  272. 里特说得有道理。

    如果这场战争只是俄罗斯和乌克兰之间的战争,并且如果俄罗斯想要将乌克兰的俄罗斯部分据为己有,那么其目前的行动无论如何都会占上风。

    但这不仅仅是俄罗斯和乌克兰之间的事。这实际上是俄罗斯与犹太帝国(控制美国和欧盟)之间的问题。因此,俄罗斯将此事视为本地事务是错误的。这是全球性的。到目前为止,俄罗斯基本上忽视了乌克兰西部,因为它不是俄罗斯的和/或反俄罗斯的。它的重点是东方。

    一段时间以来,里特一直主张俄罗斯必须处理乌克兰西部问题。它必须一路前往利沃夫并炸毁班德拉纪念碑(就像盟军炸毁柏林的纳粹标志一样)。他的观点是,无论俄罗斯多么希望将战争保持在乌克兰东部“局部”,西方集体都会利用乌克兰西部继续对俄罗斯所取得的成果发动攻势。当对方打全球战争时,你无法打局部战争。

    现在,“失去”是相对的。美国在伊拉克和阿富汗失败了吗?它赢得了所有重大战役并占领了这些土地。它并不是在军事上被击败,但它的“失败”是指其目标没有实现。乌克兰也是如此。俄罗斯可以占领并保留乌克兰东部的大部分地区,但犹太教将继续通过乌克兰西部施加压力。它可以在东部获胜,但如果乌克兰西部仍然是反俄议程的温床,人们可以说俄罗斯已经“失败”。

    对于犹太人来说,剩下的乌克兰将永远被用作对抗俄罗斯的破坏球。因此,如果俄罗斯想要取得决定性胜利,并将西方影响力完全排除在乌克兰之外,它就必须进入全面战争模式,并占领利沃夫。全面战争,不再畏缩。帕维尔·克雷格·罗伯茨基也说过同样的话。

    我说让我们来一场第三次世界大战吧。中国什么时候进攻台湾?它应该趁机占领冲绳。俄罗斯应该占领北海道,朝鲜应该占领韩国。那会很好玩。

    • 回复: @PetrOldSack
    , @Justvisiting
  273. antibeast 说:
    @antibeast

    但俄罗斯仍有 1,500 辆较旧的 T-90 MBT,其余数千辆 T-72 MBT 尚未部署在乌克兰。

    更正:“较新”的 T-90 MBT。

    • 回复: @j2
  274. @John Johnson

    事实证明,与 RF 和 AnalFU 进入边境并没有发生任何战斗。事实上,武装分子还随身携带了一个边境哨所来拍摄这段视频:
    (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4UqC5PdyMW4)
    “到达俄罗斯联邦边境”就这么多:

    真实的是……
    …萨沙·斯拉德科夫;俄罗斯著名记者点名阿佐夫斯塔尔战俘人物:
    (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1AWhwgjzayk)
    共有超过2500名军人,其中包括804名“亚速卫”。
    – 404人受伤,其中55人伤势严重
    – 200具尸体(存放在冰箱中)
    – 3 名俄罗斯战俘(1 名军官,2 名士兵)。
    这就是现实;现实是,犹太美国正在失去它,这将是我的终结(希望是我的终结,因为我厌倦了这个扭曲的世界,尤其包括 CheatyJohnJohns)。
    观察并吃掉你的心(如果你有的话?)。
    只要这场欧洲中部的犹太战争继续下去,谁会愿意俘虏一个作弊约翰·约翰斯(CheatyJohnJohns)并让这个贱人每天观看以下视频?!:
    https://odysee.com/Battle-for-Mariupol:519a5c491923fa1caa7887ac7e1eda31e4d7c275?src=embed

  275. 很难相信一个拥有斯科特·里特的简历、职业生涯和随行人员的人能够享受不受任何影响的公正的言论自由。这就像一只素食狼得到高层肉食狼的全力支持和理解。
    我看到了贡萨洛·里拉(Gonzalo Lira)提出的这篇有趣且看似合理的论文,我对他的尊敬比任何犹豫不决的军事专家高出一千倍:

  276. MarkNiet 说:

    多么坚持将这群人与“纳粹”进行比较。 “国家社会主义”意识形态与乌克兰的情况无关。

    • 回复: @Passing By
  277. Jarhead 说:
    @jimbojones

    我同意你的评估,也同意 Ritter 的评估。

  278. j2 说:
    @showmethereal

    “俄罗斯一定太软弱无能了。因此,要么他们都是愚蠢的想要花钱,要么你写的关于俄罗斯的内容并不是完整的故事”

    俄罗斯目前对乌克兰构成非常严重的威胁。与任何小国相比,俄罗斯在军事意义上始终是一个强国,但乌克兰也不是那么小。俄罗斯现在似乎在军事规划和情报方面存在一些问题,但这种情况将在短时间内得到解决,未来不应得出任何结论。 1990年以后,俄罗斯的军事实力很弱。这种情况并没有持续多久。

    “我猜你没有意识到为什么芬兰首先与苏联签订了中立协议。”

    与苏联从未签订过任何中立协议。苏联于 1939-40 年袭击芬兰。为了夺回失地,芬兰联合德国进行了巴巴罗萨行动,但以失败告终。苏联要求签署“友好合作协定”。苏联解体后,该协议失去了效力。芬兰试图将这一协议解释为兼容中立,但苏联认为这是战时联盟,甚至一度提出执行武装合作条款。西方列强并没有因为这项协议而将芬兰视为完全中立。当然,该协议不是中立协议,而是使中立性变得不那么可信的协议。显然,你不知道这个协议。因为你知道的太少,所以你不应该写“我猜你没有意识到”。事实上,在了解更多信息之前,您根本不应该写评论。

    • 回复: @showmethereal
  279. j2 说:
    @antibeast

    “俄罗斯迄今为止的战场损失大部分是T-72主战坦克”

    是的,但是这个主战坦克有几个现代化,比如三个版本的 T-72B3,以及其他变体(T-72A、T-72AB 等)。 考虑到1990年苏联解体时,乌克兰和俄罗斯继承了坦克,所以如果现在乌克兰的1000辆T-64坦克没有现代化,我怀疑俄罗斯9000辆坦克大部分是T-72或T-90的未现代化版本。

  280. Anonymous[136]• 免责声明 说:
    @Catdog

    我看过一段视频,其中三架“俄罗斯”直升机在一些“乌克兰”森林上空连续快速被击落。唉,这实际上是某些游戏过场动画的一部分。

    是的,泽伦斯基的公关仓鼠以教授的身份发布了真实的电脑游戏片段,以证明他们的主张。哈哈!查一下。

  281. j2 说:
    @antibeast

    “更正:‘较新’的 T-90 主战坦克。”

    正如您所写,这很好,T-90 基本上是更新的 T-72。 俄罗斯也有 T-14,这在乌克兰是看不到的。 但如果乌克兰以这种速度摧毁坦克,俄罗斯将拥有坦克,但主要是旧垃圾。 对步兵很好,但很容易被摧毁。

    • 回复: @antibeast
  282. @j2

    就连乔姆斯基(沙人大师)也把这件事公开了,这是一个如此明显的民主现象,作为公众知识也是无害的。 “制造同意”。

    • 回复: @j2
  283. ricpic 说:

    俄罗斯人将注意力集中在顿巴斯,因为那里是乌克兰军队的大部分力量所在。一旦那支军队被击溃……战争就结束了。第聂伯河以西有乌克兰人吗?是的,但第聂伯河以西几乎不存在任何乌克兰战斗部队。乌克兰人在顿巴斯的伤亡数字是惨重的。继续磨砺才能取得胜利。

    • 回复: @RobinG
  284. @Priss Factor

    是的,将非对称和高超音速放回管道中,并吹掉另一侧介质。让伦敦一睹潜艇的风采。

  285. gatobart 说:

    “这位前海军陆战队员似乎研究了乌克兰最近的事态发展,并得出结论认为,俄罗斯获胜比他最初想象的要困难得多。”

    哇,我什至可以说,甚至在海军陆战队之前,世界象棋大师弗拉基米尔·弗拉基米罗维奇·普京 (Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin) 于 2024 年 12 月对乌克兰发动了他那场命运多舛的入侵。哦,等等,我实际上说过了,而且是在同一个网站上写的。检查我在 2022 年 XNUMX 月 XNUMX 日的评论中写的内容”

    “普京是个白痴。距离所有人都看到这一天的日子已经不远了。也许俄罗斯最终会得到他们所寻求的东西,他们自冷战结束以来一直在寻找的东西,在其边界上得到尊重和安全,但他们不会为此感谢他。他灾难性的外交政策(“我的首要任务是与美国保持良好关系”)将确保人类和历史对他的判决将极其严厉。正是他一次又一次地未能维护俄罗斯在世界上必须发挥的作用,即使只是因为她强大的核武库,才导致世界陷入目前的局面。他忘记了1962年XNUMX月的教训,转而盲目地追求自己的白日梦,即西方“喜欢他”。这就是为什么他从来没有停止过讨好、安抚和恳求美国北约帮派,而这些人却当着他的面嘲笑他,不断地打他一巴掌。他终于爆发了,只有弱者才会这么做,反应过度,做了一些愚蠢的事情,连他的以色列朋友也一定告诉他,他在任何情况下都不能做:入侵一个国家。 “看看我们,我们比黎巴嫩人强大得多,比加沙的巴勒斯坦人强大得多……但我们甚至无法控制他们的小块土地……!如果你有牛肉,炸弹,就不要入侵。但他不听。这令人难以置信。”

    看看我 28 月 XNUMX 日写的内容。

    [更多]

    “顺便说一句,普京的震惊和敬畏与美国在伊拉克的不同,但远没有给他带来任何军事或政治上的优势,这一事实大大减少了他成功的机会,而他似乎没有意识到这一点。他无意对乌克兰人民或财产造成太大伤害,他希望乌克兰人能够理解这一点,并表示感激,也许可以和平地站在一边,让他完成工作。好吧,事实并非如此,他的计划适得其反,因为他没有意识到这种行为不会让乌克兰人更愿意投降,相反,会让他们更有勇气反抗。这意味着泽连斯基现在手中握有一张王牌。他可能会一拖再拖,眼睁睁地看着普京和俄罗斯陷入自己的欧洲泥潭,而世界其他国家则随着日子一天天过去,越来越讨厌他们。”

    并检查我当天的评估是否正确:

    “在东欧甚至中欧,国家是由各地的碎片组成的,这与南美的情况相反,例如南美洲的国家是作为整体权利而建立的,因此它们已经存在了两个世纪。因此,对乌克兰所说的同样的话也适用于南斯拉夫和捷克斯洛伐克等不再存在的国家以及仍然存在的其他国家。因此,当我写到“在欧洲,你不能入侵国家”时,我指的不是一个非事实,即它们是像南美洲一样健全的实体,而是一个真实的事实,即对世界该地区的入侵极有可能引发大规模军事行动。类似于我们从上个世纪至今所看到的冲突。 TAM 之间发生过两次世界大战。如果巴西入侵巴拉圭并占领其大部分地区,甚至整个国家,我们可以肯定它会掀起很大的波澜,但不会演变成世界大战,更不用说第三次世界大战了,但这在欧洲任何地方都是明显的可能性。

    “另一方面,我看到那些支持俄罗斯入侵乌克兰的人似乎对他们目前看到的这次行动所取得的积极成果很感兴趣,这在某种程度上让他们忽视了俄罗斯将要付出的代价”

    首先是我 20 月 XNUMX 日的评论。

    “正如我所说,赫鲁晓夫和斯大林都是务实的人,在普京军事法庭上,他们会问一个问题来决定他的命运,就像我问的一样。 “告诉我们,普京先生,当你掌权时,北约的导弹和设施距离莫斯科有多远,现在距离莫斯科有多远……?那将决定他的命运。一个简单的切入主题的问题,就像斯大林为阻止西方喋喋不休地让梵蒂冈成为二战胜利者俱乐部的一部分所做的那样:教皇有多少个部门……?普京先生,请不要试图取悦我们,告诉我们马克龙先生是多么和蔼可亲,你与安吉拉·默克尔取得了多少进展,或者你如何出色地“压制”了苏丹埃尔多安和那个来自白俄罗斯的家伙,或者你多么健全。打败了傲慢的格鲁吉亚人。这些都不重要,因为绝对不能保证任何所谓的外交政策胜利都会持续下去。再说一遍,那些北约部队和导弹发射器现在与您掌权时相比还有多远,这就是我们想要回答的问题。”

    十年前我就曾写道,弗拉基米尔·普京可能成为俄罗斯历史上最灾难性的领导人,他对北约的令人难以置信的短视、天真的外交政策将导致世界最终走向核战争的边缘,而我们现在就在这里。我在 UR 和其他地方的评论中所写的内容都没有被证明是错误的,不幸的是恰恰相反。我可以看到,十年前,甚至可以说二十年前,当我看到这位伟大的国际象棋大师在10事件后,跑到华盛顿用双臂温暖地拥抱乔治·W·布什时,他是第一位这样做的世界领导人。并通过这一行为认识到,这个人并不是一个好消息,因为他的短视和无能使他不适合担任俄罗斯领导人。我什至不是(前)美国海军陆战队或特种部队或军事战略家。

  286. peterAUS 说:
    @PetrOldSack

    普京是否考虑过更大的背景?

    你决定。
    显然,他犯了 CINC 可能犯的所有错误:
    -误解了范式——>西方是团结的,新国家希望加入北约。
    -低估敌人——>这是显而易见的。
    -高估了自己的力量——>这也是显而易见的。
    -不了解地形——>无法拦截西方补给;不能占领城市。
    -时间-->以为一周内就能完成。
    -平民考虑——>当地的人们没有加入/提供帮助。
    你是正确的

    ......普京似乎不适合这个游戏。 ……

    一个像样的中央情报委员会会辞职。一个适当的系统将取代他/她。
    但在俄罗斯,“取代”的作用有所不同。

    西欧已经做好了为主人当炮灰的准备!

    并不真地。不需要它。乌克兰人做得很好,即使需要更多的人,东欧也会提供。或“志愿者”。在迫切需要时,北约可以简单地聚集所有逃离剧院的乌克兰公民并使用他们。

    ......退缩并允许俄罗斯财富受到嘲笑,......

    对我来说,他(和他的阴谋集团)的计划是这样的:继续做迄今为止所做的事情,并希望会发生一些事情来改变现实,使其对他/他们有利。按照目前的运营节奏,这是可行的。

    ……如果习近平确实在阻碍你……

    显然,他不是。否则,我们将看到类似的援助从中国流向俄罗斯,就像我们看到从西方流向乌克兰一样。俄罗斯没有人……嗯……盟友……什么也没做。显然,射频武装部队缺乏大量材料。我没有看到任何来自这些“盟友”的东西,特别是中国。现在,有几个原因,但没有一个是互补的。

  287. Abbybwood 说:
    @Greg S.

    我很惊讶没有人提到马里乌波尔的 Azovstal Steelworks 纳粹投降。

    阿连斯基命令他们投降以挽救他们的生命。 数百名伤员被送往俄罗斯控制的顿巴斯地区的一家医院。 十二辆公共汽车满载投降的纳粹分子,被带到俄罗斯控制区接受讯问。

    地下墓穴中还有大约一千名外国佣兵等待投降。 在阿连斯基抛弃他们之后,所有这些纳粹分子在审讯中会说什么? 还剩下多少法国高层和加拿大人、土耳其人和美国军事“顾问”?

    马克龙和埃尔多安如此努力地与普京谈判释放这些雇佣军是有充分理由的。 为“营救”这些纳粹分子进行了各种尝试是有原因的。

    那些地下墓穴和所有的亚速营纳粹分子都有故事要讲。 也许更多关于地下墓穴生物实验室的信息会出来?

    这就是普京正在为战争罪法庭收集的东西。 智力。 美国、法国、加拿大和土耳其不希望他拥有情报。

    普京表示,他这次特别行动的目标是“去军事化和去纳粹化”。

    斯科特·里特或没有斯科特·里特。 普京一直盯着奖品。

    • 同意: Cking
    • 回复: @Poupon Marx
    , @Greg S.
  288. Passing By 说:
    @Gerhard57NL

    他所描述的情景乍一看似乎完全疯狂,但当你将遍布美国媒体的点点滴滴联系起来并考虑到罪犯的性格时,它实际上变得非常合理。到目前为止,我在里拉身上看到了最好的表现,尽管我希望他是错的,因为这个场景确实很疯狂。

    • 同意: Gerhard57NL
  289. “让俄罗斯流血”并不是我最关心的问题,而是我自己的国家正被同样痴迷于推翻普京和俄罗斯的人类垃圾榨干的事实。这不是我的项目,不是我的目标,但这是我的钱。西方人对此欢呼表示他们是多么愚蠢,就像我几周前和我打交道的那个乌克兰人说的那样,我发现他和他的同伴认为他们有权为了他们的利益而得到我的钱,这让我感到非常恼火。当这里如此需要的时候。如果你对这些人表现出任何不满或愤怒,他们当然会将其转化为“你的一方正在失败”。一方面他们是正确的。我的国家、我的人民正在失败。这些人显然认为这是一个很好的牺牲。非常好的事情是,我和这个大嘴之间保持了冷静的头脑,否则很可能会导致我罕见地发脾气,而我会因为接下来发生的事情而入狱。这些人就是人渣。我不想坦白地说,但这就是我对他们的看法。又一个齐奥民族主义者团伙,由伊霍尔·科洛莫伊斯基(Ihor Kolomoiskyi)、泽连斯基(Zelensky)、鲍里斯拉夫·别雷扎(Borislav Bereza)等人资助和领导。再加上犹太复国主义者对我的政府和媒体的致命控制。

    • 巨魔: Corvinus
  290. antibeast 说:
    @j2

    俄罗斯拥有大约 1,500 辆 T-90 MBT,比旧的 T-72 MBT 更好。 以下是一些让 T-90 MBT 能够抵御 ATGM 的功能:

    然而,俄罗斯的 T-90 MBT 仍然对武装无人机毫无防备,例如土耳其 Bayraktar TB2 是乌克兰表演的真正明星。 在没有高射炮或地对空导弹防御系统的情况下,坦克营可以被武装无人机摧毁,正如土耳其 Bayraktar TB2 在乌克兰和纳戈尔诺-卡拉巴赫战争中对抗俄罗斯 T-72 MBT 所证明的那样。

  291. peterAUS 说:
    @RegretLeft

    理想情况下,我愿意相信正确的项目;不仅仅是感觉正确。

    好吧,我们现在可以开始讨论(辩论?)关于真理、直觉等等的本质。
    很多时候,对真理的追求始于感觉“这里有些不对劲……”,是的,人们得到了必要的事实等等。

    但是,是的,你提供的“观点”至少是经过深思熟虑的。我想我必须承认我确实有“普京纳德”倾向,对民族国家的方式有“最后的伟大希望”。

    自由意志。

    而且,回到文章/视频,里特或麦戈文所说的任何事情如何与达沃斯和大重置等相比“有意义”?

    一个很好的问题。非常乐意在这里讨论这个问题。
    现在……我不读/看那两位先生。这场灾难大约两周后就停止了。
    当然,至于这场战争与大重置的关系,我确实有一个理论。确实,这没什么特别的:足够大的战争往往会改变事情。我看到了几个选项/场景,其中这个可以“帮助”实施重置。

    所有这些现实政治的东西都是上个世纪的事了……三个大国应该凝结而不是死死地抓住。中国有大约 500 亿人被封锁——以便更好地超越台湾?

    我听到你了

    我像以前一样结束:“我不明白”。

    怎么样,只是一个想法:普京是大重置的一部分。但是,就像在任何权力游戏中一样,较弱的玩家会被较强的玩家吞噬。他曾经,天哪,他现在仍然在玩那个游戏,但是,他知道“他们”现在也盯上了他。这次失败是他试图不被淘汰/取代。
    哦,顺便说一句,习近平也是。最后的封锁说明了一切。对于那些想看的人来说,就是这样。正如您所看到的,到目前为止,这个在线酒吧还没有文章解决这个问题。让你思考吗?

    普京是一位老人,可能还生病了。人们倾向于抓住美好生活的最后一点并继续前进,而不是让自己变得痛苦,就像他现在肯定会经历的那样。

    事实上,情况更严重。 “他们”决定向俄罗斯进军。 “是的,你一直在和我们一起玩,但是,你知道,我们想要你的东西”。而且,他和他的伙伴们显然不喜欢这样。
    他是维托·柯里昂;拜登就是巴尔齐尼。或者,更好的是:普京是迈克尔·柯里昂;拜登是海曼·罗斯。也许是最好的:普京是迈克尔·柯里昂,拜登是阿尔托贝洛,而他之后真正的人是吉尔戴和卢凯西。
    说得通?

  292. Passing By 说:
    @MarkNiet

    我在其他地方写过,但这里值得重复:乌克兰扶轮社不是国家社会主义者,他们是犹太人制造的卡通仿制品,基于犹太人制造的纳粹代表。

  293. @anon

    你让我想起二战期间那个人会说:“希特勒正在与日本人作战。他也有一个穆斯林武装党卫队师。然而他的迷惑追随者却认为他是在为雅利安种族或西方而战。”

    啊?希特勒说他正在为德国种族而战。多次。

    普京目前已四次改变对战争的解释。

    是的,普京的追随者似乎认为他是在为基督教而战。我不明白乌克兰已经是东正教了,派穆斯林去杀害基督徒真的不是一件非常基督教的事情。轰炸居民区也不是。如果您愿意,可以在此处提供海报的报价。

    但“普京追随者”的想法并不重要。重要的是犹太人自己的想法,而绝大多数犹太社区都站在乌克兰一边。

    所以你认为普京正在与犹太人作战,尽管他正在向以色列出售石油和钻石?即使南加州的犹太人比乌克兰还多?希特勒在二战中驱逐了大部分乌克兰犹太人。或者你是否愿意杀死 2 万白人以除掉泽连斯基,尽管他有任期限制?这是把它强加给犹太人吗?普京为什么不直接关闭石油并等待他的任期结束呢?回答:因为他是以色列的朋友,这里的海报如果不这么想,那简直是天方夜谭。

    如果还有任何疑问,最后一行就表明你是彻头彻尾的俄罗斯恐惧症患者。

    我对俄罗斯人没有医学上的恐惧。我反对一个小独裁者轰炸居民区。

    不到两个月他就会死去,而你将站在有史以来最愚蠢的欧洲战争之一的一边。现阶段任何为普京辩护的人都是傻瓜。俄罗斯军方反对这场战争,如果不局限于普京电视台,大多数俄罗斯人也会反对这场战争。

    • 回复: @bwuce wee
    , @geokat62
  294. @Richard Steven Hack

    你在“俄罗斯人在浮桥渡口迷路”时迷失了我。我们中的许多人在两天前观看了俄罗斯发布的视频,他们自己摧毁了那个浮桥渡口,然后模糊的图片“证明”乌克兰实际上在那里赢得了决定性的胜利。

  295. Mefobills 说:
    @Gerhard57NL

    贡萨洛忽视了与中国经济息息相关的华尔街金融业。

    捐助阶级不希望与中国发生战争。

    捐助阶级对俄罗斯怀有种族仇恨。

    普京将寡头赶出俄罗斯,并按照道德准则重新设置国家,这对环球同人来说是巨大的中指。

    中国的制裁在哪里?华盛顿自私自利的傀儡不会咬别人的手。

    • 回复: @Passing By
    , @Gerhard57NL
  296. RobinG 说:
    @ricpic

    是的,俄罗斯人比里特更了解他们的重点。

    这是我见过的对亚速战斗机最好、最简洁的解释。尽管音频不太完美,但还是值得一听。在亚速河投降之后,有一个关键点仍然重要,无论谁认为所有亚速河都在马里乌波尔,都是错误的。雅各布·德雷津 (Jacob Dreizin) 似乎是这方面的真正专家。有趣的是,直到现在他的名字才出现在我的面前。
    德雷津报告,您想了解的有关亚速河的一切
    https://thedreizinreport.com/2022/05/17/the-fall-of-the-azov/

    • 谢谢: Notsofast
  297. Ace 说:
    @Richard B

    耶和华见证人认为第一次世界大战是人类无法自我管理的明确证据。我完全同意。

    苏联的解体是尝试重新思考人类未来的最后机会,但它被浪费了,取而代之的是,我们得到了知识分子和道德重量级人物,他们对单极世界、美国世纪、R2P、RBIO、多元文化、多样性、全球主义进行了猛烈的抨击。 、“恐怖”、AGW/气候变化、净零、跨性别主义、BLM、审查制度、垄断、离岸外包、开放边界、少数族裔崇拜、以色列崇拜、塔木德至上、富豪统治和恶魔般的俄罗斯。

    至少可以说,我初学《Western Civ 101》时所带来的乐观情绪已经不复存在了。真是笑话。除了马乔里·泰勒·格林和弗拉基米尔·普京之外,我没有看到任何有远见的人。撒旦统治。

    认真对待。

    • 回复: @Ace
    , @Alrenous
  298. Ace 说:
    @Ace

    嘟哝着。 。 。多元文化主义。

  299. Dario 说:
    @jimbojones

    >>> 基辅政权是纳粹可憎的。<<

    是啊,如果他们不可怜的话,发表这样的言论会很有趣。
    你们没有人生活在苏维埃帝国的政权下,不知道俄罗斯是什么,俄罗斯人是谁。 你写的只是提高自尊心,让你感觉比实际更好。 这是一种简单的人类行为,值得实现。
    如果要了解当今俄罗斯帝国主义行为背后的危险,就应该通过生活在苏联压迫下的人们的经历来阅读中欧和东欧的历史。 这有那么难理解吗? 俄罗斯帝国的领导人是苏联的继承者。 普京是克格勃的后裔。 哇!

    奖励:

    • 同意: peterAUS
    • 回复: @buddy love
  300. @Abbybwood

    给它们都加气,就像佛罗里达州的白蚁一样。 你在房子里搭帐篷,让毒气循环几天,它就会把它们都带走。

    如果你先残忍,慈悲似乎会更加慈悲——波彭·马克思

  301. https://www.pi-news.net/2022/05/warum-machts-putin-nicht-wie-die-usa-in-tripolis-bagdad-und-kabul/

    为什么普京没有像美国在的黎波里、巴格达和喀布尔所做的那样?

    [更多]

    2022 年 5 月 16 日

    通过 KEWIL |任何读过我们完全脑部截肢的报纸并听到我们愚蠢的政客们的人现在都会知道,普京因血癌只剩下六个月了,在此之前他想迅速夺回整个苏联,包括东德,这就是为什么芬兰和瑞典现在应该加入北约。那些不人道的俄罗斯动物,整天强奸所有八岁到八十岁之间的乌克兰女孩,并射杀她们的婴儿,他们会失去三分之一的士兵,但善良的乌克兰亚速雇佣兵,他们在推动每一个残疾妇女方面堪称典范。坐在轮椅上,但没有一个国家的战士。

    当然,现在整个西方媒体都相信乌克兰会战胜俄罗斯。这是由于西方的巨大愚蠢,他们似乎对乌克兰和俄罗斯一无所知。最重要的是,我们的白痴仍然不明白乌克兰分为亲西方的西方和亲俄的东部,其中有许多俄罗斯裔居民。但这是核心关键。

    尽管美国在政权更迭期间对的黎波里、贝鲁特、巴格达、大马士革、喀布尔及周边地区进行了数日乃至数周的狂轰滥炸,炸毁了房屋和人民,但这对普京来说不是一个选择。他不想轰炸俄罗斯人和俄罗斯的朋友。

    俄罗斯本可以很久以前就将整个乌克兰变成一片瓦砾场,就像盟军在 1945 年对德累斯顿所做的那样,或者美国在伊拉克所做的那样,但这是不可能的。这是不可能的,特别是现在在乌克兰东部,战前该地区的某些地区仍然有高达 90% 的人是“俄罗斯人”。所以一切都一目了然。

    俄罗斯士兵在东部,在顿巴斯,在友好国家的中部。没有人愿意向他们的朋友开枪。如果可能的话,俄罗斯也不希望平民陷入火线。这就是为什么数千人被运送到俄罗斯。

    当然这些人正在接受调查,他们是否拥有枪支,是否有反俄纹身,他们的想法如何。乌克兰反过来做了同样的事情,但我们的新闻媒体只攻击俄罗斯军队。

    如果可能的话,俄罗斯不想轰炸基础设施。战后,亲俄部分人口应该返回东部的国家,尽可能不被摧毁。在马里乌波尔,极端民族主义的亚速雇佣军和反俄分子长期封锁自己,但不幸的是,情况却有所不同。

    但乌克兰希望如此。她想摧毁整个顿巴斯并消灭尽可能多的亲俄派。她随心所欲地向整个地区开枪,在高层建筑中隐藏战斗哨所和军事阵地,摧毁桥梁,扣押俄罗斯人后裔作为人质,在各种建筑物上写下“幼儿园”,然后在愚蠢的媒体油腻者面前将其炸毁受邀参观。等等。

    尽管所有的计算都是错误的,但这仍然是俄罗斯军队的主要障碍,也是基辅政权的巨大优势,基辅政权将自己的部分人口和东部国家视为敌人。

    俄罗斯目前正试图在前线背后制造事实,正式吞并整个顿巴斯。无论美国人和北约的梦想是什么,普京和他的同事(以及最终的继任者)都不会归还克里米亚或顿巴斯。俄罗斯绝对不能撤军。无论如何,如果真的出现这种情况,那就意味着俄罗斯很弱,而且几十年来一直如此。

    也许连怪诞的贝尔博克和她的朋友们都听说过,拿破仑和希特勒征服世界时曾经来到过莫斯科郊区。但事情就这样结束了。

    • 回复: @Proud_Srbin
  302. Руски Мир 是受打击最大、打击最严重的人,也是 1917 年被处决的政变受害者。
    所选择的解放方法,首先是俄罗斯母亲,然后是俄罗斯世界,似乎正在取得成果。
    宇宙以神秘的方式运动,当科学家征服它、训练它,最重要的是,教它按照开明的规则行事时,它的运动就会更加可预测。

  303. Vidi 说:

    里特假设只要西方继续提供武器,乌克兰人就会继续战斗。 因此,俄罗斯将很难在其特殊的军事行动中取得成功。

    然而,里特似乎忽视了乌克兰人的士气和战斗精神。 (或者至少作者惠特尼没有提到这一点。)正如拿破仑所说,“在战争中,道德与肉体的关系就像三与一一样”。拿破仑是对的。俄罗斯人在列宁格勒围城战中证明了这一点:这座城市被纳粹包围了近三年,但它幸存下来并进行了战斗。俄罗斯人的士气和战斗精神是英勇的。

    乌克兰人的士气好吗? 他们愿意为了什么而死?

    • 同意: Poupon Marx
    • 回复: @Dario
    , @Notsofast
  304. j2 说:
    @Catdog

    Catdog 就乌克兰声称击落 200 架固定翼俄罗斯飞机的说法写道:
    “基于什么?这听起来像是一个疯狂而令人难以置信的谎言。他们只展示了总共不到十几架被击落的飞机和直升机的照片确认。 ”

    尝试这个简单的逻辑。西方武器到达乌克兰东部。如果俄罗斯控制了乌克兰领空,这是不可能的。因此俄罗斯并不控制乌克兰的大部分领空。

    乌克兰只剩下不到100架飞机。由于俄罗斯并不控制乌克兰领空,因此其拥有的飞机不可能超过100架。

    俄罗斯原本有300架飞机。现在已经不超过10o了。因此乌克兰人击落了c。 200架飞机。

    Oryx 页面仅显示了 26 架很久以前被击落的俄罗斯飞机的视觉证据。这个数字似乎根本没有增长。那么,如何才能c. 200架飞机被击落?很简单,这些飞机飞得很接近俄罗斯控制区,当飞机被击中时,飞行员仍然可以飞到俄罗斯控制区,然后他跳起来,飞机坠落到地面。他当然不想被乌克兰纳粹分子俘虏,并尽力站在自己一边。


    liveuamap.com 给出公告。你可以关注它。有时乌克兰会宣布有一两架飞机被击落。最近很少发生:大多数情况下他们射击俄罗斯无人机,因为飞机不再飞越乌克兰上空。这些公告的总和确实给出了 ukrinform 中击落的 200 架飞机。我觉得这个说法很可信,或者最多也没有多少偏差。

    • 回复: @Poupon Marx
  305. bwuce wee 说:
    @John Johnson

    1. 可惜普京的人气空前高涨!哎哟!
    2. 不幸的是,卢布是目前世界上表现最强劲的货币。哎哟!而且是黄金支持的!!
    3. 莫斯科的汽油价格是每加仑 85 美元,太糟糕了。哎哟。
    4. 太糟糕了,亚速营向普京投降——数千人——一个人!哎哟。现在他们可以面临战争罪指控并在西伯利亚工作直到世界末日。哎哟。
    5. 不幸的是,普京揭露了美国支持乌克兰的非法生物武器实验室。哎哟。
    6. 不幸的是,一位美国海军上将从非法生物实验室所在的马里奥波尔钢铁厂投降了。哎哟。
    7. 太糟糕了,乌拉恩的基础设施已被炸回石器时代,这一切都是因为奥巴马扶植的假总统泽连斯基被告知他将得到美国的支持以取得胜利。哎哟。他真是个傻瓜。他将因战争罪受到审判。哎哟。

    太糟糕了,你支持失败的一方,小乔尼。哎哟。这太受伤了!

    • 回复: @John Johnson
  306. ariadna 说:
    @YetAnotherAnon

    “布尔加斯,罗马尼亚最大的港口”
    这是布尔加斯哪里?!?

    • 回复: @YetAnotherAnon
  307. Dario 说:

    这就是今天的俄罗斯人如何描述今天的俄罗斯。

    不懂俄语的人应该打开翻译。 第一分钟就足以了解俄罗斯曾经是什么,现在仍然是什么。

  308. j2 说:
    @PetrOldSack

    “即使是乔姆斯基(沙人大师)也公开了这一点,这是一个如此明显的民主现象,作为公众知识是无害的。 “制造同意”。

    绝对地。普京制造了这一同意。

  309. @Quartermaster

    是乌克兰误判了北约和西方。无论谁赢得这场战争,我们可以确定的一个确定是,他们将以艰难的方式认识到这一点,正如我们迟早必须经历的那样。

  310. j1 说:

    俄罗斯人犯了一个战术错误,那就是对乌克兰人过于温和和吝啬。这只会激怒敌人。

    如果你试图对他们温柔,他们就会滥用你的善良,让你成为恶棍。像车臣那样的全面战争才能带来真正的解决方案。

    • 同意: Thim
    • 回复: @Passing By
  311. geokat62 说:
    @John Johnson

    我对俄罗斯人没有医学上的恐惧。我反对一个小独裁者轰炸居民区。

    如果这是真的,那你为什么不大力反对过去八年来对顿巴斯居民区的轰炸(导致14,000名无辜者被屠杀)?

    • 谢谢: showmethereal
    • 回复: @John Johnson
  312. Boll 说:

    当美国停止支持乌克兰战争努力时,这场战争就会结束,这场战争已经持续了四分之一个世纪,直到 2014 年。从我看来,似乎没有关于前线发生的情况以及军事表现是否良好的可靠信息。无论是军事的好还是坏。尽管如此,我想知道为什么有人认为俄罗斯大约200000万的军事力量足以粉碎对手300000万以上的正规军和600000万以上的国民警卫队,这些部队由北约装备和训练,并在顿巴斯久经沙场。过去8年的活动。我确实认为美国的努力是针对欧洲,而不是俄罗斯,俄罗斯是诱饵。

  313. Cking 说:

    我相信,美国政策在下个世纪全面控制世界的总体地缘政治描述是正确的。全球统治是否现实?这一伟大事业能否通过其他方式实现?

    亚佐夫斯塔尔立即投降,俄罗斯继续进攻;谁向谁投降了?在我看来,里特的这种“逆转”是一个我不知道的有限的闲逛故事。乌克兰已经取得了一些成功,但在俄罗斯人流血之前就会流血致死。乌克兰不能失去一个人或一个男孩,他们会失去整个公司。乌克兰生物武器实验室被占领是一件令人震惊的事情,西方国家可以忽视。顿巴斯是俄罗斯的,并将永远属于俄罗斯。波兰将获得他们的份额,匈牙利将获得他们的份额。乌克兰将会萎缩。俄罗斯边境的吠叫声永远不会停止。普京抽出时间给以色列总理贝内特打电话,除了新闻报道之外还有什么影响?猫和老鼠?

    我们正在考虑俄罗斯的有限进攻。另据报道,美国国防部长奥斯汀致电俄罗斯国防部长绍伊古将军,寻求退出计划。 https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/us-defense-secretary-speaks-with-russian-counterpart-for-first-time-since-russia-invaded-ukraine/ar-AAXf8vi

  314. @Anonymous

    周日,在伦敦市中心散步时,我首先看到了一场参加人数众多、喧闹的巴勒斯坦集会,旁边还有一个由非洲人组成的大型集会,他们正在抗议南苏丹之类的事情(我没有停下来,检查一下,但他们爬上了陆军元帅艾伦·布鲁克的雕像,他的头转向一边,看起来很厌恶),然后在他们旁边,三个表情闷闷不乐的人举着乌克兰国旗。我认为其中一个是跨性别者,或者是一个看起来很不幸的女人。

    这实际上很有趣,几乎像漫画一样描绘了公众的善变。就在几周前,在同一地点,乌克兰还达到了男孩乐队般的受欢迎程度。乌克兰需要稍微混合一下——洛基不会在每部电影中都与同一个家伙战斗,因为过了一段时间就会变得陈旧。

    • 回复: @Anonymous
  315. Passing By 说:
    @Mefobills

    正如我在视频评论中所写,与中国开战的想法乍一看似乎很疯狂。因为我们推测,当权者是理性的行为者,他们会现实地评估其事业的成本/效益比。如果这样想,我们就忽视了这样一个事实:当权者所遭受的痛苦会严重改变他们的判断力:沉迷于权力、虚荣、贪婪往往会导致鲁莽。
    另外,如果捐助者阶层认为,如果未能制服俄罗斯,其对权力的控制可能会放松,并且考虑到中国确实是保守派最讨厌的人,那么还有什么比发动一场冲突更好的方式来收紧控制呢?默认情况下有保守派吗?

    • 回复: @Mefobills
  316. Passing By 说:
    @j1

    并杀死该行动本应拯救的乌克兰俄语人民?俄罗斯人并没有放过乌克兰人,他们只是试图放过被乌克兰人当作人肉盾牌的亲人。

  317. Rubicon 说:
    @Anon

    “……伟大的米尔斯海默最近说过……”?芬克尔斯坦在接受 The Saker 采访时援引米尔斯海默和乔姆斯基的话说,俄罗斯进入乌克兰“是一种恐怖主义行为”。

    您确实意识到在世界大部分地区,包括西欧,这些美国犹太人并没有受到太多关注?他们的 *只要* 他们在那里是因为那里有很多金钱和声望。

    与此同时,我受过良好教育的欧洲人说了两件事:“西欧没有人,尤其是语言学家,对乔姆斯基那个老秃鹰给予任何关注……而且他们从未听说过米尔斯海默。”

    • 同意: Arthur MacBride
  318. Dario 说:
    @Vidi

    >>>乌克兰人的士气好吗? 他们愿意为了什么而死?<<

    为了自决权? 🙂

    • 哈哈: Poupon Marx
    • 回复: @Vidi
  319. @j2

    俄罗斯没有可以持续保持在高空并监控所有空中交通的预警机吗?

    是的,它确实: https://www.aerotime.aero/articles/30204-russias-new-awacs-plane-turns-radar-on-for-the-first-time

    那么,为什么车辆大量进入乌克兰边境呢?这是无法修复的吗?

    • 回复: @peterAUS
  320. @bwuce wee

    孩子,你似乎对我发布的任何内容都感到情绪激动。

    如果你想追随那个穿着踏步鞋、轰炸产房的独裁者,那就继续吧。

    它只会证实你长期做出错误的决定。

    我比斯科特、安格林或迈克更好地预测了这场战争的走向,这已经载入了我的历史。

    也许我应该在这里写博客,因为像您这样的许多发帖者似乎在没有强有力的指导的情况下无法辨别现实。

    这场战争失败了,普京将在60天内死去。

    你的幻想将会崩溃,你最终将不得不接受现实:普京是一个大屠杀的独裁者,他只想在最后的日子里玩一场战争游戏。一场将导致超过 100 万白人丧生的战争游戏,以色列将获得廉价的俄罗斯石油。这场战争与犹太人无关。即使非犹太人当选乌克兰总统,普京也会发动这场战争。他试图像彼得大帝那样走出去,但却会像尼古拉斯二世和他1904年灾难性的日俄战争。具有讽刺意味的是,泽伦斯基原本是一个无名小卒,而普京却把他变成了全球英雄。做得好。

  321. @Gerhard57NL

    现在这对我来说比斯科特·里特更有意义,非常合理和合乎逻辑。

    它可能不正确或完全正确等,但从这里开始,它比里特更适合这个场景,解释了正在发生的一切,特别是俄罗斯的战争步伐,特别是当俄罗斯开始猛烈打击某些东西时的爆发和某人

    而里拉则更加规律、理智,等等。在这些事情上没有必要相信任何人。根据事实和逻辑进行工作,当事情成功时我们就知道了。我们与人打交道也是如此:里特来自环城公路内部……根本没有必要相信他,但要始终留意以某种方式证明他的东西。

    话又说回来……无需花太多时间(如果有的话)。它必须有相应的价值。无论里特是什么,对我来说都不重要……我想这很准确,因为我认为他仍在环城公路内

    • 同意: Gerhard57NL
  322. @geokat62

    如果这是真的,那你为什么不大力反对过去八年来对顿巴斯居民区的轰炸(导致14,000名无辜者被屠杀)?

    我反对一切战争中轰炸居民区的行为。

    你可以在我的历史中找到我批评希特勒和丘吉尔没有采取反对住宅爆炸的立场的历史。双方都不会放弃城市轰炸,双方平民都遭受了苦难。完全站不住脚。丘吉尔应该被挂在德累斯顿。

    我不认为这能让我减少对普京的批评。

    他下令了这场血腥的战争,并且随时可以取消。

    但他不是一个真正的男人,他不能承认自己错了。因此,更多的 18 岁年轻人被征召入伍,遭到屠杀,而他在乌兹别克斯坦的受迷惑的防守者也为他提供了更多蹩脚的借口。他们没有任何儿子可以提供给他,像往常一样,穷人因为某个失败者独裁者的战争而失去了他们的儿子和父亲,而这场战争根本不需要。

    • 回复: @geokat62
    , @Avery
  323. buddy love 说:
    @Dario

    苏联帝国由乌克兰人统治。也许您认为他们是“俄罗斯人”,因为您无法区分。无论你想象的俄罗斯人是什么样的野蛮人,都可以很容易地被称为乌克兰人,现在更有可能的是,我们看到乌克兰人在最坏的情况下有多么野蛮。

    • 回复: @Dario
  324. @Priss Factor

    “剩下的乌克兰将永远被用作对抗俄罗斯的破坏球。因此,如果俄罗斯想要取得决定性胜利,并将西方影响力完全排除在乌克兰之外,它就必须进入全面战争模式,并占领利沃夫。一场全面战争,不再胆怯。”

    我认为你的大局观是正确的。

    这就是为什么核战争比我漫长一生中的任何时期都更有可能发生。

    “西方”所做的正是他们所说的他们永远不会做的事情,七十​​年来每一位军事专家都告诉他们永远不要做——为俄罗斯在第三次世界大战中掷骰子创造激励。

    所有的大人都离开了房间。

  325. geokat62 说:
    @John Johnson

    我不认为这能让我减少对普京的批评。

    波罗申科和泽连斯基连续14,000年炮轰顿巴斯地区居民区,造成XNUMX万无辜平民被屠杀,你们根本不屑批评他们,却选择批评“小独裁者”回应你们的说法。反对”……你不明白这有什么问题吗?

  326. Cookie 说:

    当你读到扎伦斯基愿意做这件事或那件事时,你所读到的就是王座谈话背后的真正权力。

    我多次提到过,在华盛顿打这场战争的人们根本不关心乌克兰人……他们会为了自己的目标烧毁所有 44 万乌克兰人,他们会为了自己的目标烧毁整个欧洲。

    在华盛顿进行这场战争的有权势的人是真正的纳粹,记住那些一开始支持希特勒的人在华盛顿和伦敦,他们在柏林的代理人和朋友在意识到他们无法控制希特勒时就离开了……他去了关闭脚本。

    还记得当温莎家族认为希特勒是他们的人时,他们向纳粹致敬。

    这些人暗中鄙视伟大的未洗洁者,并将烧死我们所有人以保持他们的权力和特权,这就是扎伦斯基的支持者,扎伦斯基害怕他们……有充分的理由,他们是犯罪集团,是人类的祸害这摧毁了人们的生活。

  327. anon[230]• 免责声明 说:
    @John Johnson

    他试图像彼得大帝那样走出去,但实际上却看起来像尼古拉斯二世和他1904年灾难性的日俄战争。

    仅此一句话就表明您对俄罗斯人民及其历史了解得多么少。你基本上在你写的所有内容中强化了犹太人的叙述和犹太人对时事和历史的解释。根据您的说法,尼古拉二世是“坏”沙皇或“失败”沙皇,将责任转移到他身上,而远离了数十年的犹太革命恐怖主义,可以追溯到民粹派、民粹派、沃利亚和泽米亚等,并最终达到顶峰在布尔什维克。对于西方人来说,彼得大帝是“好”沙皇的共同参考点,尽管这绝不是俄罗斯人的共识。至于 1904 年的日俄战争,雅各布·希夫和犹太金融对日本赢得这场战争的帮助最大。再说一次,当像(((约翰·约翰逊)))这样的人告诉我们尼古拉斯二世有多么糟糕时,这总是一个危险信号,避免了尼古拉斯二世被犹太人谋杀的事实(很可能是在犹太人的祭祀仪式中),之后犹太人布尔什维克开始基本上以纯粹的种族为基础针对非犹太俄罗斯人,无论他们的社会阶层、宗教和政治意识形态如何。

    具有讽刺意味的是,泽伦斯基原本只是一个无名小卒,而普京却把他变成了全球英雄。

    不,犹太媒体把泽连斯基变成了“全球英雄”。他只是西方的“全球英雄”,因为他有((西方)))媒体的支持,而不是俄罗斯。

    这场战争失败了,普京将在60天内死去。

    继续做梦

    • 回复: @John Johnson
    , @Mefobills
  328. Z-man 说:
    @GMC

    我的意思是,这些事情很难错过。
    是的,我不想成为这些炮弹的接收端。

  329. 如果出现一些重要的新信息,分析师改变主意是可以接受的。 为什么这是一个争议? 如果俄罗斯人没有做得很好,那不是里特的错。 他只是传达他所看到的。 我希望他是错的,我希望能够更快地解决冲突并避免北约的损失,但即使作为一个外行,我的直觉已经告诉我一段时间了,这场战争至少还会经历另一个冬天。

    但谁能说美国佬不会拿出比价值 44 亿美元的武器和物资更疯狂的东西呢? 就像真正的脚踩在地上一样。 或者来自波兰的导弹袭击。 那么迄今为止的任何分析,即使是最有能力的分析,无论如何都是不可能的。

    而说到波兰,一旦俄罗斯人投入足够的资源和精力来对付乌克兰西部地区,恐怕它必然会成为乌克兰人新的训练和集结地。 已经是这样了,因为洋基队太疯狂了。 但一旦它完全发挥这一作用,我们就会看到冲突蔓延到北约国家。 在我看来,俄罗斯人选择了两害相权取其轻的做法:将国家的一半交给敌人随意支配。

    • 回复: @Dario
    , @Wokechoke
  330. bwuce wee 说:
    @John Johnson

    再说一次,你要么在撒谎,要么精神上无能:我从来没有提到过犹太人——在这个帖子中一次也没有提到过。你真是个蹩脚的辩手,和我辩论连一分都赢不了!
    那只乌鸦味道如何?小约翰尼男孩?

  331. peterAUS 说:
    @Poupon Marx

    俄罗斯没有可以持续保持在高空并监控所有空中交通的预警机吗?

    没有

    是的,它确实: https://www.aerotime.aero/articles/30204-russias-new-awacs-plane-turns-radar-on-for-the-first-time

    普京人就是这么看的。表演、脚本练习等与残酷的战斗现实之间存在巨大差异。
    这场灾难发生仅两周后,这种差异就变得非常明显。
    当然,要摆脱“俄罗斯斯特朗克”邪教并不容易。
    无论如何,这样也好。

    那么,为什么车辆大量进入乌克兰边境呢?

    取决于谁在问。
    对于普廷塔斯来说:
    -克里姆林宫对附带损害极为谨慎。
    -克里姆林宫保留其最好的能力来应对真正的冲突,即北约和俄罗斯之间的冲突。
    - 是为了让这些武器更接近射频,然后在那里摧毁它们。
    -最后一个和最好的一切都失败了:这都是计划的一部分。我们这些凡人,是无法理解的。

    对于非普京邪教成员:
    他们进入是因为俄罗斯联邦武装部队无法阻止他们。
    现在,为什么他们做不到,这是一个很长的故事。也有点技术含量。对这个话题感兴趣的人已经知道为什么了;其余的人如果需要的话可以轻松地在网上找到。

    这是无法修复的吗?

    同样,取决于谁在问。
    对于普廷塔斯来说:没有什么可以解决的。一切皆好。我们正在获胜。一切都按照计划进行。
    对于该邪教的非成员:RF 武装部队根本无法“修复它”。

  332. @Richard Steven Hack

    小威廉·斯科特·里特(William Scott Ritter, Jr.)最近对正在进行的乌克兰-俄罗斯战争的语气发生了变化,这是由于美国政府的巨大压力。

    最近我观察到,广播谈话节目主持人乔治·拉尔夫·诺里也面临着类似的情况——受到美国政府的巨大压力——他开始邀请美国政府的退休安全分析师加倍宣传美国反对俄罗斯联邦!

    让我们面对现实吧,美国已经把乌克兰输给了俄罗斯。

    美国政府在乌克兰投资了数十亿美元。迄今为止,俄罗斯联邦在 Z 行动上的支出还没有超过 10 亿美元。

    [更多]

    =============================================
    =============================================

    俄罗斯总统在 09 年 2022 月 XNUMX 日阅兵式上的讲话

    弗拉基米尔普京:

    亲爱的俄罗斯公民!

    亲爱的退伍军人!

    士兵们和水手们、中士和工头同志、见习官和少尉同志们!

    各位军官、将军、海军上将同志们!

    我祝贺你伟大的胜利日!

    当祖国的命运被决定时,保卫祖国始终是神圣的。怀着这种真正的爱国主义感情,米宁和波扎尔斯基的民兵为祖国而奋起,向博罗季诺战场进攻,在莫斯科和列宁格勒、基辅和明斯克、斯大林格勒和库尔斯克、塞瓦斯托波尔和哈尔科夫附近与敌人作战。

    所以现在,这些天你们正在为顿巴斯人民而战。为了我们祖国俄罗斯的安全。

    9 年 1945 月 XNUMX 日,作为我们团结的苏联人民、他们的团结和精神力量的胜利,作为前线和后方无与伦比的壮举,永远铭刻在世界历史上。

    胜利日对我们每个人来说都很近,也很珍贵。在俄罗斯,没有一个家庭没有受到卫国战争的摧残。她的记忆永远不会消失。这一天,在川流不息的“不朽军团”中——卫国战争英雄的子孙、曾孙。他们携带着他们的亲人、永远年轻的阵亡士兵和已经离开我们的退伍军人的照片。

    我们为不屈不挠、英勇的胜利者一代感到自豪,我们是他们的继承人,我们有责任记住那些粉碎纳粹主义的人,他们让我们保持警惕并尽一切努力消除全球战争的恐怖不会再次发生。

    因此,尽管国际关系中存在种种分歧,俄罗斯始终主张建立一个平等且不可分割的安全体系,这一体系对整个国际社会至关重要。

    去年12月,我们提议缔结安全保障协议。俄罗斯呼吁西方进行坦诚对话,寻求合理、妥协的解决方案,照顾彼此利益。一切都是徒劳。北约国家不想听到我们的声音,这意味着他们实际上有完全不同的计划。我们看到了。

    公开地,正在准备在顿巴斯发动另一次惩罚性行动,以入侵包括克里米亚在内的我们的历史土地。在基辅,他们宣布可能获得核武器。北约集团已开始对我们毗邻的领土进行积极的军事发展。

    因此,我们绝对不能接受的威胁是有系统地、直接在我们的边境造成的。一切都表明,与美国及其年轻伙伴押注的新纳粹分子班德拉的冲突将不可避免。

    我再说一遍,我们已经看到军事基础设施如何展开,数百名外国顾问如何开始工作,北约国家定期交付最现代化的武器。危险与日俱增。

    俄罗斯先发制人地拒绝了侵略。这是被迫的、及时的、唯一正确的决定。一个主权、强大、独立国家的决定。

    美利坚合众国,特别是在苏联解体后,开始谈论其排他性,从而不仅羞辱了整个世界,也羞辱了它的卫星国,它们不得不假装没有注意到任何事情,温顺地吞下这一切。

    但我们是不同的国家。俄罗斯有不同的性格。我们永远不会放弃对祖国的热爱、信仰和传统价值观、祖先的习俗、对各国人民和文化的尊重。

    而在西方,这些具有千年历史的价值观显然已经决定取消。这种道德堕落成为愤世嫉俗地歪曲第二次世界大战历史的基础,煽动仇俄心理,赞扬叛徒,嘲笑受害者的记忆,抹杀胜利者和遭受胜利者的勇气。

    我们知道,想要参加莫斯科阅兵式的美国退伍军人实际上被禁止这样做。但我想让他们知道,我们为你们的功绩和你们对共同胜利的贡献感到自豪。

    我们向所有盟军士兵——美国、英国、法国——抵抗运动的参与者、勇敢的中国士兵和游击队员——所有战胜纳粹主义和军国主义的人致敬。

    亲爱的同志们!

    今天,顿巴斯的民兵与俄罗斯军队的战士们一起,在自己的土地上作战,斯维亚托斯拉夫和弗拉基米尔·莫诺马赫的战斗人员,鲁缅采夫和波将金的士兵,苏沃洛夫和布鲁西洛夫的士兵,在那里与敌人作战,英雄们在那里与敌人作战。伟大卫国战争的英雄——尼古拉·瓦图京、西多尔·科夫帕克、柳德米拉·帕夫利琴科战斗至死。

    我现在向我们的武装部队和顿巴斯民兵发表讲话。你们正在为祖国、为祖国的未来而战,以便没有人忘记第二次世界大战的教训。这样世界上就没有刽子手、惩罚者和纳粹分子的立足之地。

    今天,我们在伟大卫国战争中夺去生命的所有人的神圣记忆前低头,在儿子、女儿、父亲、母亲、祖父、丈夫、妻子、兄弟、姐妹、亲戚、朋友的记忆前低头。

    我们低头缅怀敖德萨的烈士,他们于 2014 年 XNUMX 月在工会大厦被活活烧死。缅怀顿巴斯的老人、妇女和儿童,以及死于残酷炮击、野蛮袭击的平民。新纳粹分子。我们向我们的战友低下头,他们在一场正义的战斗中英勇牺牲——为了俄​​罗斯。

    宣布默哀片刻。

    (沉默片刻。)

    我们每一位官兵的去世,都是我们所有人的悲痛,也是亲友无法弥补的损失。国家、地区、企业、社会团体将竭尽全力为这些家庭提供关心和帮助。我们将对死伤战友的子女给予特殊支持。今天签署了有关此事的总统令。

    祝愿受伤的官兵早日康复。我感谢军队医院的医生、护理人员、护士、医务人员的无私工作。向你们为每一个生命而战而深深鞠躬——经常在炮火中、在前线、不顾自己。

    亲爱的同志们!

    现在,在红场上,来自我们广大祖国许多地区的士兵和军官肩并肩站着,其中包括那些直接从顿巴斯、直接从战区赶来的士兵和军官。

    我们记得俄罗斯的敌人如何试图利用国际恐怖分子团体来对付我们,试图散布民族和宗教仇恨,以便从内部削弱和分裂我们。什么都没有成功。

    今天,我们不同国籍的战士并肩作战,像兄弟一样,为彼此掩护枪弹弹片。

    这就是俄罗斯的力量,是我们团结的多民族人民的伟大的、坚不可摧的力量。

    今天,你们正在捍卫你们的父辈、祖父、曾祖父为之奋斗的事业。对于他们来说,生命的最高意义始终是祖国的福祉和安全。对于我们,他们的继承人来说,对祖国的奉献是主要价值观,是俄罗斯独立的可靠支持。

    那些在伟大卫国战争期间粉碎纳粹主义的人向我们展示了永远的英雄主义榜样。这一代的胜利者,我们将永远尊敬他们。

    荣耀归于我们英勇的武装部队!

    对于俄罗斯! 为了胜利!

    万岁!

    =============================================
    =============================================

    • 谢谢: RobinG
    • 巨魔: Corvinus
  333. @ariadna

    “布尔加斯,罗马尼亚最大的港口”
    这是布尔加斯哪里?!?

    在保加利亚!!

  334. James Bond 说:
    @gatobart

    你知道这是走向何方..
    不是一个快乐的地方。
    俄罗斯人一直愿意在地狱里见到你,以防你认为你可以欺负他们屈服。
    最终发生的事情完全是西方的错。

    • 回复: @GeneralRipper
    , @gatobart
  335. @j2

    你把自己搞糊涂了……你最新的话与你之前的评论不符。这两部分都不可能是真的。

    至于芬兰……哦,好吧——是的——站在纳粹一边,因为苏联袭击了你们。知道了。好吧,自从苏联解体以来,你坐在这里假装芬兰没有在幕后与北约合作吗???

    • 回复: @j2
  336. Avery 说:
    @John Johnson

    {你可以找到我的历史,我批评希特勒和丘吉尔没有采取反对住宅爆炸的立场。}

    这是哪里?
    向所有热心读者展示 UNZ.com.

    既然你声称自己有批评希特勒和丘吉尔的历史,那么你肯定也有评论过乌克兰局势的历史,可以追溯到2014年的乌克兰纳粹政变。

    那么,让我们看看您*批评乌克兰纳粹战争罪行的评论。
    从敖德萨大屠杀开始。

    ______________________________
    * 我们如何知道“约翰·约翰逊”是谁?
    这是一个足够常见的名字。

    • 同意: SS-The Independent
    • 回复: @geokat62
  337. frankie p 说:
    @showmethereal

    GGG在第一场比赛中就击败了Canelo。 法官抢劫了他并称其为平局。 这是一场闹剧。 GGG再次与他战斗,Canelo获胜。 许多人将那场比赛打成平局,但卡内洛确实提高了他的表现。 然而,他已经为 PED 进行了肮脏的测试。

    我希望他们再次战斗。 GGG已经40岁了,但他是一名出色的战士。

    谢谢。

    • 同意: peterAUS
    • 回复: @showmethereal
    , @nokangaroos
  338. ema 说:

    因为他们告诉你这样做,那是因为你改变了你的观点,里特先生

  339. anon[101]• 免责声明 说:

    PeterAUS 比巴格达鲍勃更有趣。羞辱和卑鄙的投降似乎真的把他逼上了绝路。我想知道为什么?

  340. Dario 说:
    @buddy love

    蛇油。 这就是我所看到的......

  341. GeneralRipper [又名“GKWillie”] 说:
    @James Bond

    俄罗斯人一直愿意在地狱里见到你,以防你认为你可以欺负他们屈服。

    不幸的是,这是(((全球主义精英)))和他们在西方收买的走狗/妓女唯一理解的事情。

    我祈祷俄罗斯能够揭开他们的虚张声势,为他们提供他们迫切需要的东西。

    你不想‘生活’在这些恶魔污秽为你计划的世界里。

    • 同意: SS-The Independent
  342. Dario 说:
    @Boba Lazarević

    >>>或者来自波兰的导弹袭击。 <<

    到目前为止,俄罗斯正在从白俄罗斯境内进攻。

  343. Bill Jones 说:
    @DarkSideLawyer

    我关注里特的伊拉克灾难。当时我突然意识到他是一位罕见的人物:理性的声音。我看到了未成年性行为指控,当时我认为这带有他被陷害的味道,我的第一反应是对他如此容易上当受骗感到惊讶,但谁也不知道。我不太担心与幽灵的接触,因为在他的工作中这是不可避免的。总的来说,在我看来,如果没有自动获得可信度,他似乎值得阅读/聆听。

  344. Notsofast 说:
    @Vidi

    团队精神,这正是在马里乌波尔的乌克兰人(以及法国外籍军团)所遭到的破坏。

    • 回复: @Vidi
  345. El Ogro 说:

    关于北约武器交付的问题:这篇 5 月 XNUMX 日的文章解释了为什么俄罗斯拦截这些武器并不那么容易
    http://johnhelmer.org/the-last-ditch-is-poland-russias-phase-3-plan-for-western-ukraine/
    作者提出了解决这个问题的办法:在乌克兰西部开辟一条战线,封锁波兰和斯洛伐克边境。

    几天前我在 MSNC 上看到了帕特雷奥斯将军。据他介绍,90门榴弹炮和190万发弹药几乎全部运抵前线。就背景而言,英国人现在可能损失了 1000 多门火炮。我看到估计他们每天可能使用 10-30k 贝壳。因此,很难看出这些交付如何能够阻止乌克兰的失败,但它们肯定会延长战争并造成更多的俄罗斯伤亡(这对美国来说才是最重要的)。

    关于芬兰。如果加入北约对俄罗斯来说不是问题,那么为什么乌克兰加入北约会成为问题呢?普京表示,只有北约在芬兰建造建筑才会成为问题。但如果芬兰成为北约成员国,就不可能阻止这种情况发生。这将是俄罗斯一直头疼的问题。也许芬兰希望北约与俄罗斯发生战争,这样他们就能夺回卡累利阿。在我看来,明智的做法是现在入侵芬兰并将其作为一个国家(没有双关语)。

  346. Thim 说:

    最初的计划失败了,所以他们撤退了,并创建了第二阶段,现在显然已经失败了。

    责任归咎于普京。

    俄罗斯需要一位愿意战斗的新领导人。

    • 回复: @gatobart
  347. Anonymous[145]• 免责声明 说:
    @Gerhard57NL

    美国转向与中国开战。 亲爱的主,接下来怎么办?

    黑人活动人士曾经说过,他们可以让美国社会“车轮倒退”。通过封锁对中国进行的战争将会取得巨大成功。中国将跌入谷底,持续时间足以使全球贸易无法运转——网络中缺失了太多环节。其后果将是大规模饥荒,并且由于无法获得替换零件而导致技术水平普遍下降。每个保留其工业基础的国家都必须为因断裂的联系而无法进行的流程提供资本货物。如果您认为这很简单,请考虑一下美国婴儿配方奶粉供应的短暂延迟两个月,再加上(据我了解)让婴儿挨饿两个月的建议,因为婴儿配方奶粉的替代品“不安全”。
    在类似的情况下,通常是在战时,但有时是制裁的后果,发生的情况是,在工业因设备故障而瘫痪之前根本无法建立零部件的更换流程。从历史上看,核心产业得以保留,但由该产业支撑的部分人口却死亡了。
    这发生在世界各地。

    所以:与中国开战。 愚蠢的想法。
    中国现在欠其他国家 3 倍的 GDP,并且自 2008 年左右以来出于政治原因错误投资其资本以维持就业建设项目。 中国将无法按期偿还。 这将使世界其他地区的上述问题稍微不那么严重。
    美国面临的真正问题是1990年苏联水平的世界经济失败不可避免。在世界经济失败发生之前,美国能否让中国卷入战争存在一些疑问。

    我们现在所拥有的政府控制的经济体的真正问题是差异:它们要么大规模成功,要么大规模成功。由于全球化,大规模的失败现在已经遍及全球范围。进步不是很棒吗?

  348. @anon

    仅此一句话就表明您对俄罗斯人民及其历史了解得多么少。你基本上在你写的所有内容中强化了犹太人的叙述和犹太人对时事和历史的解释。根据您的说法,尼古拉斯二世是“坏”沙皇或“失败”沙皇,将责任转移到他身上,而远离了数十年的革命犹太恐怖主义

    俄法战争就像这次一样是一场彻底的灾难。这不是犹太人的叙述。

    他们在与日本人的一场海战中惨遭失败。
    https://www.19fortyfive.com/2021/12/the-battle-of-tsushima-the-only-real-battleship-battle-ever-fought/

    有史以来最大的海军损失之一。

    与犹太人无关。尼古拉二世傲慢自大,完全低估了他的敌人。普京也做了同样的事情,这让他更像尼古拉二世而不是彼得。

    尼古拉斯也没有吸取教训,以同样的傲慢态度参加了第一次世界大战。德国人在坦能堡战役中击败了俄罗斯人。这一损失进一步挫伤了俄罗斯公众的士气,并激励了共产党人。

    也许你认为他仍然因为将一些犹太人追赶到美洲而感到骄傲。没人在乎。

    军事历史学家认为他对俄罗斯军队来说是一场灾难,普京也将获得同样的地位。

    犹太布尔什维克开始基本上以纯粹的种族为基础针对非犹太俄罗斯人,无论他们的社会阶层、宗教和政治意识形态如何。

    他们大约有一半犹太人血统,尼古拉斯没有勇气在有机会的时候追捕他们。

    不,犹太媒体把泽连斯基变成了“全球英雄”。他只是西方的“全球英雄”,因为他有((西方)))媒体的支持,而不是俄罗斯。

    他是亚洲媒体的英雄,而他们没有犹太人。

    世界站在乌克兰一边,而泽伦斯基则是反英雄。

    战争中的英雄可能存在于某些犹太背景之外。并非一切都与犹太人有关。早在犹太人产生影响之前,战争和战争英雄就已经存在于西方和亚洲历史中。

    • 巨魔: Notsofast
    • 回复: @anon
  349. @frankie p

    对……第二场比赛,GGG要么打平,要么赢一局。 但是是的,又是抢劫……但这并没有太大的进步,因为它是一个更老的GGG。 一旦你在拳击中超过 32 分——每年都会带来力量和/或速度的下降。 在第一场比赛中,GGG 已经过了他的巅峰期,仍然“赢”了真正的评委。 但是你可以看到他在第二场比赛时速度较慢。 1岁就没有意义了。 GGG 甚至进一步超越了他的鼎盛时期。 真正的战斗迷知道他被抢劫了。

    • 同意: frankie p
  350. @El Ogro

    关于芬兰。如果加入北约对俄罗斯来说不是问题,那么为什么乌克兰加入北约会成为问题呢?普京表示,只有北约在芬兰建造建筑才会成为问题。

    因为这是一个蹩脚的战争借口,他后来改为保护顿巴斯。

    事实上,由于顿巴斯问题,乌克兰从未获得过加入北约的资格。您不能在有争议的边界的情况下申请。

    乌克兰从未申请加入北约,法国和德国都表示,即使他们以某种方式解决了顿巴斯问题,他们也不会投票支持北约。

    但不要指望 PutinTV 或任何 Whitney/Anglin 博客上会出现这样的细节。

    如果普京说北约,那么这一定是真的……直到他改变解释,我们也会捍卫这一解释。

    • 回复: @Notsofast
  351. dimples 说:
    @El Ogro

    “关于芬兰。如果加入北约对俄罗斯来说不是问题,那么为什么乌克兰加入北约会成为问题呢? ”

    与芬兰不同,乌克兰由于由狂热的反俄罗斯黑手党统治,将成为一个敌对国家。尽管无可否认,这听起来就像美国,另一个由狂热的反俄罗斯黑手党、犹太新保守派统治的国家。奇怪的是,美国和乌克兰竟然在一起了!

  352. follyofwar 说:
    @you

    越来越明显的是,俄罗斯需要一些愿意与他们并肩作战的强大盟友。太糟糕了,我们距离德国人为了支持这个特殊国家而被冻死还有几个月的时间。那么,中国最近在做什么来帮助俄罗斯呢?他们本应在奥运会上结下的联盟到底发生了什么?难道中国不知道,一旦俄罗斯垮台,下一个目标就是他们吗?中国需要停止将数百万公民囚禁在公寓里,这是一种可笑的“零新冠”尝试,并在为时已晚之前忙于帮助俄罗斯。即使不统一的国家变得不适合其公民居住,例外国家也只会接受世界统治。

    • 回复: @Notsofast
    , @peterAUS
    , @Wokechoke
  353. Mefobills 说:
    @Passing By

    路过的时候,您可能看过下面的视频,但如果没有,也值得一看。

    在大约 30 分钟的时间里,马西谈到了领导层必须筹集多少捐款才能偿还政党系统的费用。当然,政客需要金钱来竞选。

    我同意,那些操纵政客的幕后黑手沉迷于权力、虚荣和贪婪。

    也许你是对的,捐赠者阶级可能会变得鲁莽。

    我不是自由主义者,但必须承认他们能够采取道德立场,就像马西那样。

    • 谢谢: Truth Vigilante
    • 回复: @Passing By
  354. Mefobills 说:
    @anon

    这是我最喜欢的沙皇之一:

    https://johndenugent.com/tsar-ivan-the-terrible-on-the-jews-russians-continue-military-advance-and-encirclements-of-the-main-jewkrainian-army/

    伊凡雷帝从小就必须与宫廷阴谋作斗争。波兰寡头们不断地试图杀死他。波兰王子会从我们的(((朋友)))那里借钱,然后在俄罗斯制造严重破坏。

    我们的朋友从他们的高利贷业务中赚到了很多钱,尤其是在贸易路线上对贵金属货币进行套利。

    如果他们从波兰进入俄罗斯,那么犹太人就是在自找麻烦。

    ___________________________

    “像他一样残忍和不宽容,伊凡雷帝从不以宗教为由迫害人,除了犹太人。

    他并没有试图向他们介绍基督教信仰或让他们受洗。

    他活活烧死他们,吊死他们,淹死他们。

    他的习惯是说,任何王子都不应该相信他们的话,也不应该同情他们。”

    • 谢谢: Pheasant
  355. frankie p 说:
    @Anonymous

    “所以:与中国开战。 愚蠢的想法。
    中国现在欠其他国家 3 倍的 GDP,并且自 2008 年左右以来出于政治原因错误投资其资本以维持就业建设项目。 中国将无法按期偿还。 这将使世界其他地区的上述问题稍微不那么严重。”

    据我所知,中国所有的债务都起源于中国。 请解释一下你说中国欠其他国家3倍的GDP是什么意思。 从 1980 年代开始,当中国做出推进市场力量(自下而上)与经济计划(自上而下)的混合经济的重大决策时,中国所有的债务都来自中共经营的银行,即中国人民银行(PBoC)。中国)和四家银行于 1978 年分拆:中国工商银行(ICBC)、中国银行(BOC)、中国农业银行(ABC)和中国建设银行(CCB)。 请注意,这些银行也是受国家控制的。 中国做出了一个明智的决定,将所有债务“留在国内”,因为他们研究并了解了国际货币基金组织、世界银行、国际清算银行等西方机构是如何通过发行债券从不发达国家中提取资金的。债务。 那些不发达国家通常有腐败的领导人,他们愿意出卖他们的人民、国家的资源和国家的未来,以换取存放在纽约一家银行的几谢克尔。

    外国实体在中国的唯一投资是民营企业,比如恒大,现在正处于破产边缘,在国有银行的引导下进行重组和再融资。 我的猜测是,外国债券持有人将从这一行动中大幅削减。

    请澄清您的评论。

    • 回复: @Anonymous
  356. @Ukraine Tiger

    请不要把我们的时间浪费在你对茶叶的业余阅读或你通过个人观察来荒谬地假装客观真理上。

    • 回复: @Kurt Knispel
  357. Notsofast 说:
    @John Johnson

    尽管像你和狗脸巨魔乔乔这样的巨魔正在尽最大努力破坏这个网站,但你永远不会成功。这个网站的读者根本不知道会被你的巨魔废话所迷惑。你只不过是一个不便之处,就像公园里的一堆狗屎一样,可供人踩踏。

    • 同意: Truth Vigilante
  358. @Z-man

    芬兰人不是斯堪的纳维亚人!

    好吧,无论他们是什么,我都不觉得批判性思维是他们的强项。这也适用于瑞典人,他们绝对是斯堪的纳维亚人。

    • 回复: @acementhead
  359. Notsofast 说:
    @follyofwar

    俄罗斯不需要中国牵着它的手,因为它绝对会在经济和军事方面摧毁西方。停止PCR,请记住,老傻瓜仍在试图捍卫里根政府,所有这些新保守派恶魔最初都是在里根政府中产生的。至于谁找到了斯科特·里特,我敢打赌,一些儿童色情内容不知何故被下载到了他的电脑上。

  360. peterAUS 说:
    @follyofwar

    好问题。
    我相信你已经有了一些答案。大概是太不舒服了。没关系。我会尽力。
    两套。一个用于 Putintards (1),另一个用于普通人 (2)。

    越来越明显的是,俄罗斯需要一些愿意与他们并肩作战的强大盟友。

    1.你错了。你消耗了太多 MSM/美国/犹太人的宣传。一切皆好。
    2.是的。

    ......这些天中国正在做什么来帮助俄罗斯?

    1.俄罗斯不需要任何帮助。一切都按计划进行。
    2.什么也没有。

    他们本应在奥运会上结下的联盟到底发生了什么?

    1. 效果很好。你只是看不到而已。
    2:没什么。向 NPC 公开表演。

    难道中国不知道,一旦俄罗斯垮台,下一个目标就是他们吗?

    1. 没关系。不会有“下一个”。俄罗斯将获胜,北约将崩溃,美国将解体。
    2. 并非如此。真正的游戏是另一回事。您在下面的“零新冠”中触及了这一点。

    至于:

    中国需要停止将数百万公民囚禁在公寓里,这是一种可笑的“零新冠”尝试,并在为时已晚之前忙于帮助俄罗斯。

    1.习近平正在对抗ZOG生物武器并取得巨大成功。
    2、不说。此外,这一点也不荒唐。这是对某个计划的很好的执行。

    • 回复: @Anon
    , @Truth Vigilante
  361. anon[230]• 免责声明 说:
    @John Johnson

    他们大约有一半犹太人血统,尼古拉斯没有勇气在有机会的时候追捕他们。

    没有。高级领导层主要是犹太人,就其中有非犹太人(我并不否认)而言,布尔什维克中最暴力、最激进和最坚定的分子是犹太人。我将向您推荐 Kevin MacDonald 关于该主题的文章:

    https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/STALIN%E2%80%99S-WILLING-EXECUTIONERS-Slezkine/52513e7b877fe15aa00fe410b7e3f76e9affb71f

    https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.169.8635

    安东·邓尼金和领导反对布尔什维克的白军将军们非常明确地表明,他们是在种族基础上与犹太人作战。丘吉尔在他的文章《犹太复国主义与布尔什维克主义:犹太灵魂的斗争》中显然谈到了这一点(从上下文来看,这是一篇相对偏犹太主义的文章)。

    当你考虑到布尔什维克甚至杀害了他们队伍中的非犹太左派和布尔什维克,以及喀琅施塔得水手等支持者这一事实时,布尔什维克有 50% 犹太人的想法就更具有误导性了。他们在坦波夫叛乱中杀害了农民。他们谋杀了在 1905 年“血腥星期日”事件中领导抗议活动的农民和牧师,据说他们的杀戮被用来为他们的意识形态借口辩护:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Left-wing_uprisings_against_the_Bolsheviks

    布尔什维克还以象征性的方式进行杀戮,这使得他们的种族仇恨变得如此明显,以至于加深了这种仇恨并明确了他们的意图。拉扎尔·卡冈诺维奇 (Lazar Kaganovich) 毁坏了基督救世主大教堂,1812 年序曲就是在这里首次亮相的,还有数千座教堂。他们把俄罗斯许多最伟大的文学和艺术人物前往寻求艺术灵感的奥普蒂纳修道院变成了古拉格,并杀害了长老们,就像他们杀害了数百万东正教基督徒和牧师一样。我们可以继续下去……

    • 回复: @John Johnson
  362. @showmethereal

    最好不要尝试在我们的网站上将“滑稽”和“讽刺”与这么多浪费时间的疯子结合起来。我可以分享你对托尼·布莱尔的看法。我从未见过他,但对保罗·约翰逊早期的热情感到困惑,更令我感到困惑的是,从牛津大学的一位与他同时代的人那里听说他是那里的孩子之王——已经是暴民中魅力超凡的领袖。

    • 回复: @mulga mumblebrain
  363. Anon[574]• 免责声明 说:

    里特的“重新评估”发生在几天前,而且已经是旧的新的了。同时
    他的推特账号似乎消失了。 你必须惊叹那些付出的人
    普京和 Ru 总参谋部就如何在乌克兰 SMO 中提高比赛水平提供建议。
    最好去 Andrei Martyanov,可能是今天最有见识的评论
    认为:
    “我要向那些仍然不明白的人重复一遍,VSU 无法在机动战争的经典框架中作战。当他们暴露在外时,就会被消灭。唯一的办法
    他们的战斗是通过隐藏在民用基础设施内并利用平民作为
    人体盾牌。美国有史以来最好的代理人正在被消灭
    五角大楼的直接指挥肯定会让阿富汗的耻辱黯然失色。这就是什么
    当一个人声称自己是“历史上最优秀的战斗力量”而没有面对真正的对手时,就会发生这种情况
    与拥有大枪的对手进行战争。”
    所以里特先生应该冷静下来,因为这个百万人重组的浮江军是
    被那些不称职的人训练,除非他们模仿俄罗斯人。

    • 巨魔: Wizard of Oz
    • 回复: @El Ogro
    , @map
  364. 几乎可以肯定,里特受到了信任。

  365. El Ogro 说:
    @Anon

    在马尔蒂亚诺夫提到的攻击中,Ukies 损失了 100 人,而 RF 损失了 10 人。假设损失比为 10:1,如果 UKR 愿意损失 200 万人,那么 RF 将损失 20 万人。 RF 损失 20k 是显着的。所以我的问题是,俄罗斯联邦如何在不遭受如此巨大损失的情况下永久消灭英国军队(包括使整个国家非军事化)。

  366. Anon[262]• 免责声明 说:

    自从这场战争开始以来,我们就充斥着军事“专家”,他们中的大多数人从未参加过战争,而那些参加过战争的人也没有赢得过战争。人们应该相信他们的观点有什么可信度。甚至电子游戏玩家和彩弹玩家也热衷于这种观点行为。

    现在这篇文章很快指出斯科蒂是一名海军陆战队员,但那又怎样。 这是否应该赋予某种教皇式的绝对正确性? 斯科特是一名情报官员,对我来说,这意味着他将远离重大战役的作战和战略规划。 他的军事教育似乎表明,尽管他无疑很聪明,但他的经验与实施重大行动所需的经验相去甚远。 我们在这里所说的是,斯科特比俄罗斯总参谋部更了解。

    我可以驳斥他的每一个断言。 例如,他断言俄罗斯需要 1.2 万人才能成功完成这场战役。 我想指出的是,阿道夫为巴巴罗萨行动组装了 3M。 斯科特是说俄罗斯人需要几乎一半的人数才能征服乌克兰东半部吗? 国防军以南的另一集团军群由 200,000 万人组成。 斯科特是否断言,俄罗斯人拥有与国防军作战的丰富经验,现在需要的军队数量是德国人的六倍?

    UR 读者只需将常识应用于文章中的观点即可成功地反驳所提出的观点。 在我看来,斯科特突然掉头是有问题的,这一分钟又是那一分钟。 这向我表明,他最初的想法还很不清晰。 战争主动权的变化总是微妙的、不可预测的,并且需要时间。 一天早上突然醒来并转身是业余爱好者的标志。

    每天晚上都有一些将军指出俄罗斯将做什么,这次撤军意味着什么,为什么俄罗斯会失败,因为他们没有渡过一些河流以及所有这些废话。 事实上,唯一知道自己要做什么的人是俄罗斯总参谋部和高层政治家。 对于任何其他人来说,断言任何事情都是纯粹的胡言乱语。

    俄罗斯将占上风。 谨慎和谨慎的做法是因为乌克兰东部居住着与俄罗斯关系密切的人。 有没有头脑正常的人相信,如果他们愿意,俄罗斯无法将哈尔科夫和基辅夷为平地?

    我断然不同意斯科特的观点。 不管他突然转变的动机是什么,他出去吃午饭了。 我们都听过这个和那个专家的说法,不幸的是,无论主题或问题如何,所有这些人的阐述都被证明是废话。

    • 回复: @Mulegino1
  367. gatobart 说:
    @James Bond

    “俄罗斯人一直愿意在地狱里见到你,以防你认为你可以欺负他们屈服”

    你在说什么啊,农民。我一生中从来没有愿意在任何战场上愤怒地面对俄罗斯,恰恰相反,只是因为我一直认为,自二战以来,他们几乎总是站在历史的正确一边。哇,又一个不明白弗拉基米尔·普京对北约犯罪家族的盲目、误导性外交政策与俄罗斯、前苏联作为反对法西斯主义、纳粹主义、西方帝国主义和殖民主义的近十年来的支持者之间的区别的人。世纪。任何读过我的评论的简短汇编的人都会意识到我的批评是针对哪里的;不是针对一个国家或其人民,而是针对他现任领导人的疯狂信念,即他会受到那些满怀仇恨他和俄罗斯、并且除了看到它们被摧毁之外别无选择的人喜欢。

    现在,即使不是普京的粉丝,大多数人也没有看到这一点,他们被自己偶像的辉煌和辉煌蒙蔽了双眼,那就是我十年前的预测每天都在变得更加真实,即使他们中的许多人都认识到这一点间接地。他们说我在重要的事情上是对的,事实就是,随着乌克兰的入侵越来越变成开放的北约与北约的对抗。俄罗斯战争更有可能以一方使用核武器而另一方做出同样的回应而告终。

    这就是为什么我十年前的(正确)预测不是俄罗斯会在未来某一天的紧要关头被打垮,而是普京所推行的盲目宽容和绥靖外交政策在某一时刻会像世贸中心塔楼一样倒塌,最终结果很可能是双方之间的公开战争。因此,对于那些仍然不明白的人来说,当我写到他对北约的政策最终可能是灾难性的时,我并不是在谈论俄罗斯在战场上被击败,而是在谈论他们将世界带入核战争。正如我们所说的那样,这里的许多评论员已经在预测我们将走向何方。怎样才算正确呢。

    • 哈哈: Wizard of Oz
  368. Anon[262]• 免责声明 说:
    @peterAUS

    彼得

    我同意你所说的一切。人们似乎认为普京一天早上刚醒来,挠了挠蛋蛋,在坚果上发现了一只跳蚤,一生气就入侵了乌克兰。

    我敢打赌,这方面的计划是酝酿已久的,每一个意外事件都被预料到并应对。

    人们。尽管 MSM 不断撒谎,但出于某种原因,仍然听他们的胡言乱语,并全部或部分相信他们所看到和听到的内容。例如,一些英国媒体发表了一篇关于乌克斯击败俄罗斯人的文章。照片中,4名士兵挤在一起,面色清新,干净整洁。他们肯定是由穆特和杰夫训练的,并由绅士季刊提供服装。

    对于青少年和视频游戏玩家来说,这可能看起来令人印象深刻。对于稍有军事经验的人来说,这都是废话。

    我们所有的“专家”都知道弗拉德应该做什么、不应该做什么。他们就像一场重量级拳击比赛的观众。他们知道每个拳击手应该做什么和不应该做什么,但没有人会进入拳击场并展示他们的拳击“技能”

    就像新冠病毒一样,我只希望这一切能够结束。废话如此之多,你需要一艘他妈的宇宙飞船才能保持在这一切之上。

    • 回复: @peterAUS
  369. Wokechoke 说:
    @follyofwar

    令人震惊的是他们没有派遣飞行员。容易隐藏。

  370. @Jonathan Revusky

    芬兰和瑞典都是由(相对而言)愚蠢的年轻女性“领导”的。当我住在新西兰时,我可以认出愚蠢的年轻女性“领导者”。他们都没有 STEM 学位;他们在说谎方面都有“程度”。阿德恩的“学位”是公共关系和政治传播学学士学位。不应该有这样的“学位”,而且在进入大学至少需要一些脑力的情况下也不应该有。

  371. Wokechoke 说:
    @Boba Lazarević

    我无法预测“全面制裁”。 迄今为止,美国对俄罗斯的行为中还没有出现过如此非同寻常的资产扣押行为。

    英国信号和监视与美国的全面整合也是非同寻常的。

    但我们将会看到结果如何。

  372. 我认为这个问题相当简单。

    我不相信里特督察的政治言论。自从他反对入侵伊拉克以来,我读了他的文章。我当然很高兴他是一位绅士,他会根据自己理解的数据集做出反应。

    在这种情况下,他只是说,我以为数据集会是这样,但随着时间的推移,数据表明了其他东西。对于任何真诚的分析师来说,他都是忠实的。我相信他从一开始就反对美国的干预。

    但这是一个单独的问题,即根据他对数据集的观察,实际发生的情况。

    政治斧头与数据分析不同,这对他有好处,因为他有诚实地对数据做出回应。

  373. @gatobart

    好吧,伙计……如果你这么说……我认为你 99% 都错了,但我也可能错了……我们会看到……迟早会看到的。在那之前,我给你的建议是,多阅读,少花时间发表猜测,这些猜测对于像我这样的人来说似乎是“一厢情愿”……无论如何,作为一个在东欧度过了头 30 年、在东欧度过了大约 27 年的人。美国,我提醒你们和其他人,美国/西方在金融和道德/精神上都已经破产。如果你认识一个国家/民族,在六千年的时间里,没有经历痛苦/牺牲,也没有经历很长的时间来恢复,就从像美国/西方这样的阶段走出了,请告诉我。在那之前,请获得通知!

    • 回复: @gatobart
  374. @anon

    他们大约有一半犹太人血统,尼古拉斯没有勇气在有机会的时候追捕他们。

    没有。高层领导主要是犹太人

    我说过布尔什维克有一半犹太人血统。这是一个准确的说法,因为该党成员约有一半是犹太人。

    或者你认为我试图通过称其为半犹太人来淡化犹太人的过度代表性?当时犹太人约占俄罗斯人口的2%。显然比例过高。

    你没有教我任何东西。那些试图淡化犹太人参与共产主义的人完全回避了这个话题。事实上,在许多行业,即使有公开记录,你也可能会因为这样做而失去工作。

    列宁不是犹太人,讽刺的是,差点杀死他的是一位左翼民主犹太女性(范雅·卡普兰饰)。尼古拉二世没有勇气除掉他,这样可以为我们省去很多麻烦。这确实是我的观点。尼古拉二世搞砸了两场战争,让列宁走了。普京将被视为失败者沙皇。

  375. Anonymous[136]• 免责声明 说:
    @al gore rhythms

    诚然,旅鼠群的中心——最响亮的美德信号所在——是旅鼠,它们的肤浅、注意力缺陷多动症和缺乏原创思想,几乎无法辨认出它们是人类。

    尽管如此,随着疼痛的加剧,他们会被一遍又一遍地提醒。他们中的一些人甚至会开始学习东西,因为疼痛可以集中注意力。即使乌克兰不可避免地屈服,西方和东方之间的这场斗争(中国100%与俄罗斯在一起)也不会消失。

    与此同时,几乎所有欧洲国家都加入了这场斗争,将能源安全作为首要任务,这让他们现在牢牢地坐到了孩子们的餐桌上。这就是你赢得愚蠢奖品的方式。

  376. @Anon

    欧洲诸侯国对俄罗斯发动战争的热情可能会因为在黑暗中瑟瑟发抖、饥饿难耐的冬天而受到一定程度的挫伤。

    然后是新冠疫情。明年上前线之前,欧盟公民是否会因为受到威逼而再次获得三四次提振?有多少人会在行军几公里后因心脏病发作而倒下?

  377. peterAUS 说:
    @Anon

    我同意你所说的一切。

    我对此不太确定。

    人们似乎认为普京一天早上刚醒来,挠了挠蛋蛋,在坚果上发现了一只跳蚤,一生气就入侵了乌克兰。

    有些人。
    有些人则不这么认为。我就是其中之一。

    我敢打赌,这方面的计划是酝酿已久的,每一个意外事件都被预料到并应对。

    是的,对于前者;绝对不适合以后。不知何故,他和他的团队错过了一些突发事件。己方部队表现不佳,敌方部队表现出色,北约/西方的反应,包括冻结/扣押资产以及所有有助于涌入的……等等……等等……

    我们所有的“专家”都知道弗拉德应该做什么、不应该做什么。他们就像一场重量级拳击比赛的观众。他们知道每个拳击手应该做什么和不应该做什么,但没有人会进入拳击场并展示他们的拳击“技能”。

    嗯……我必须承认我是他们中的一员。即使不是专家,也是感兴趣的观察者。
    我将重申我的观点:他不应该像他那样攻击乌克兰。如果他相应地准备好他的部队,如果他“按照规定”(按照适当的交战规则集中兵力)进攻,他早就占领了顿巴斯并将其与克里米亚联系起来。可能在前三周内。
    他没有。
    而且,如果我站在他一边,我不知道他现在应该做什么。

    就像新冠病毒一样,我只希望这一切能够结束。废话如此之多,你需要一艘他妈的宇宙飞船才能保持在这一切之上。

    两者都不会停止。当你用拳击来比喻时,就是一比二。现在,我想我们也会打出左勾拳,而且很快。

  378. Vidi 说:
    @Notsofast

    团队精神,这正是在马里乌波尔的乌克兰人(以及法国外籍军团)所遭到的破坏。

    据我了解,在马里乌波尔亚佐夫斯塔投降的乌克兰军队应该是乌克兰最优秀、最积极主动的军队。如果这些人都放弃了,那么其他纳粹国家的士气还剩多少呢?

  379. anon[230]• 免责声明 说:
    @John Johnson

    列宁不是犹太人

    我知道你在恶搞,但我只是用你的恶搞帖子作为分享信息的跳板。
    列宁有四分之一的犹太人血统。

    http://content.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2077413,00.html

    https://www.thejc.com/news/features/lenin-s-jewish-roots-1.447185

    • 回复: @John Johnson
    , @El Ogro
  380. @peterAUS

    “ 一切皆好。我们正在获胜。一切都按照计划进行。 “……‘我们’是谁……?!……你是阿甘正传的克隆人/双胞胎吗 🙂

    • 哈哈: InnerCynic
  381. @John Johnson

    普京将被归入同一类失败者沙皇的行列中。 “……一厢情愿的想法,伙计……一厢情愿的想法……除非你为 8200 部队‘工作’……并且你知道到底发生了什么……

    • 回复: @John Johnson
  382. Vidi 说:
    @Dario

    >>>乌克兰人的士气好吗? 他们愿意为了什么而死?<<

    为了自决权? 🙂

    什么自决? 即使是乌克兰总统泽连斯基也不敢违抗谎言帝国。 奴隶没有自决权。

    即使乌克兰人从美国和俄罗斯人手中获得了自由,普通乌克兰公民最多只能期待继续被寡头们盲目抢劫——并继续比一些非洲国家更穷。值得为此而死吗?

    • 同意: Truth Vigilante
  383. littlewing 说:

    我想说他们直到现在才知道他在那里。
    然后他们意识到他已经对他们造成了伤害。
    所以他们必须让他彻底改变方针。
    我的第一个打击,总是正确的,是他受到了某种方式的威胁。
    这与他们已经对数百万人进行的审查没有什么不同。

  384. Richard B 说:
    @Robert Dolan

    失败?

    是的。失败。举个例子……

    他们可以无限印钞票……

    好像印钞票是永久权力的秘密,而不是他们失败的证据(就像在失败的经济中一样,正如你所知,他们控制着经济)。

    没有罗伯特,他们不能无限地印钞票。正如我之前对你说过的,我经常阅读你的评论并同意你写的很多内容。但我完全不同意他们是无敌的。

    我们可能无法阻止他们。但这仍然并不意味着他们是无敌的。也不意味着它们故意给我们造成的问题是无法克服的。他们不是。

  385. Richard B 说:
    @Irish Savant

    除了 JSI 失败的那一点之外,我同意你的说法。我看不到什么证据来支持这个(理想的)结果

    这里有一些像你一样的评论者,我在许多问题上分享了他们的观点,并且我喜欢阅读他们的评论,他们经常对我提出批评。我明白为什么。但我仍然坚持这一点。虽然原因不止一个,但主要原因(我之前在其他评论中提到过)是:

    虽然他们擅长渗透、颠覆、背叛、破坏和死亡(你们知道,他们已经这么做很久了),但他们不擅长社会管理。

    直截了当地说,虽然有点粗鲁,犹太人对于社会管理的意义就像黑人对于自我控制(和游泳)的意义,以及白人对于种族自我保护的意义。

  386. frnmlanm 说:
    @meamjojo

    这是荒谬的。俄罗斯有英雄,我们有邪恶的小丑,您先生就是其中之一

  387. @anon

    我知道你在恶搞,但我只是用你的恶搞帖子作为分享信息的跳板。
    列宁有四分之一的犹太人血统。

    哇 1/4,还有阿什肯纳兹。一个真正的摩西。

    如果他的祖父是犹太人,那么他就不算按照部落。

    • 回复: @geokat62
  388. Mikhail 说: • 您的网站
    @j2

    J6BmM

    我认为乌克兰的反攻应该在俄罗斯从基辅撤军后立即开始,但乌克兰没有利用这个机会,而是宁愿等待西方武器。乌克兰实际上拥有足够的苏联时代牵引火炮,因此不需要这样做。如果乌克兰同意停火,它实际上也同意俄罗斯准备稍后发动另一次袭击。乌克兰也不应该计划一场长期战争,因为这场战争对乌克兰经济的破坏比对俄罗斯经济的破坏更大。他们应该进行激烈的战斗。这里的许多评论者认为,在俄罗斯炮击乌克兰人挖掘的阵地中,乌克兰人损失的人员数量比俄罗斯人在积极攻击这些阵地时损失的人员还要多。这是错误的:在这种情况下攻击者的损失总是更大。

    “俄罗斯表现不佳并犯下战术错误并不意味着基辅政权获胜。”

    俄罗斯的错误是操作性的,而不是战术性的。它在作战层面上已经失败了:由于虚假情报而导致的战略打击,由于后勤失败而导致的对基辅的包围,由于低估了防御而导致了削减,以及由于错误地估计了其阻止西方武器援助的能力而导致了关闭大锅。这些都是非常严重的操作失误。乌克兰有一些优势:步兵规模更大、态势感知能力更强、道德更高。它应该找到一种将优势转化为成功的方法。当然,基辅还没有获胜,如果它不利用其可能性,它就不会获胜。但俄罗斯将在战略层面输掉这场战争。这已经很清楚了。俄罗斯在世界上的战略地位有所削弱。

    正如所说,俄罗斯仍将努力赢得这场战争。看来是想以三军取胜。对于俄罗斯人来说,这可能意味着 80,000 到 160,000 名新男性,可能接近较小的数字。和平时期俄罗斯军队有280,000万人。很可能这最后的努力还不够。这也表明俄罗斯不会动员一百万或几百万的人。如果他们用这三支军队来尝试,那是不可能的,因为之后他们就没有百万军队的参谋了。

    “斯科特·里特提供了军事分析”

    在我看来,斯科特·里特确实很了解军事问题,但他写的始终是纯粹的宣传,你无法从中得到任何真相,除非你同时阅读西方的分析并试图弄清楚里特之间的真正含义。线条。

    西方显然坚决支持基辅政权,与俄罗斯相比,基辅政权缺乏武器。因此,停火对基辅政权比俄罗斯更有利。

    在俄罗斯人撤出基辅之后,基辅政权无法很好地对抗俄罗斯人。

    从 12 月 XNUMX 日起,斯科特·里特 (Scott Ritter) 接受采访,表明他相信俄罗斯很快就会在顿巴斯获胜:

    • 回复: @j2
  389. @SS-The Independent

    普京将被视为失败者沙皇。 “……一厢情愿的想法,伙计……一厢情愿的想法……除非你为 8200 部队‘工作’……并且你知道到底发生了什么……

    妄想?军事历史学家已经称这是一场灾难。他要如何解决这个问题?动员起来参加他声称不存在的战争?又杀掉50万俄罗斯新兵?征召 18 岁的年轻人参加一场本应是为期两周的特别军事行动的战争?

    普京需要几个月的时间来解决这个烂摊子,而且他撑不到秋天。

    联邦安全局将在那之前解决掉他。

    他已经病入膏肓,这就是他发动这场愚蠢战争的原因。所以他的解释前后矛盾,整体计划缺乏策略。

    联邦安全局不会让他把这件事拖到下一年。他们知道他已经失去了理智。

    他将接受手术,他们会把他消灭掉。

    • 巨魔: Olivier1973
    • 回复: @Kurt Knispel
  390. @John Johnson

    列宁的妻子是犹太人,一家人在家讲意第绪语​​。

  391. geokat62 说:
    @John Johnson

    如果他的祖父是犹太人,那么他就不算按照部落。

    根据以色列的回归法,如果您有一位犹太祖父母,您就有资格移民到以色列。

  392. littlewing 说:
    @anonymous

    俄罗斯控制着天然气/石油。
    俄罗斯控制粮食。
    他们不能失去这个。
    到了冬天,泽伦斯基百万人将被饿死和冻死。

  393. 斯科特·里特(Scott Ritter)是一名俄罗斯特工,因此他和他的家人可能会与醉酒的非法移民一起死于车祸中

  394. gatobart 说:
    @SS-The Independent

    坦率地说,我不在乎你对“我的猜测”的看法,我更不在乎你认为我应该花更多时间在什么事情上。我不仅对完全陌生的人对我的用途的看法感到最蔑视时间或我的智力思考,但也有一种情况是,从我很小的时候起,甚至在我学会走路之前,我就已经知道,检查我对人和事的看法和看法是否正确的方法不是去了解人们的想法在他们中,我在很小的时候就已经看到,人们自己的评估在很多时候都是错误的,但将它们与现实本身、明显的事实和经过验证的真理进行比较。这种方法从来没有让我失望过,所以你可能会猜到我对你的思考的重视程度,完全陌生的人。

    事实上,普京不断地喋喋不休地谈论他的西方伙伴,谈论他有多么希望得到西方的喜欢,以及从他飞往华盛顿投向等待的 GWB 怀抱的那一天起,他在过去二十年里所做的一切顺从和绥靖政策,导致了这一结果。他和俄罗斯无处可去,世界正处于第三次世界大战的边缘,目前无人能对此提出异议。是的,也许俄罗斯可以在乌克兰取得胜利,但如果这演变成一场欧洲范围的战争,然后演变成核战争,那将是一场得不偿失的胜利。你可以保留自己重要的观点,我是对的,现在更是如此。

  395. Anon7 说:
    @you

    Ritter 之前的一些评论可能对此感兴趣:

    乌克兰“特种作战”与伊拉克战争(沙漠风暴)对比

    俄罗斯在乌克兰的失败战略给他们带来了严重的问题,而且是一个短期问题。如果俄罗斯开始增调 500 万军队,并在军队准备好轰炸乌克兰之前花费数周时间,结果会怎样?以美国为首的联军在派遣地面部队之前的五周内投掷了 90,000 万吨炸弹,在任何军队进入之前摧毁了伊拉克的基础设施,从而引发了伊拉克战争。普京会加倍努力并决定摧毁乌克兰的战斗能力和意愿吗?俄罗斯人会使用炸弹和导弹摧毁乌克兰的电网、通讯、饮用水、食品店、桥梁(特别是通往东部的道路)、火车和主要道路吗?换句话说,乌克兰真的爆发战争了吗?然后就他们想要的东西进行谈判?

    乌克兰“特种作战”与越南战争对比

    里特指出,在越南的美国将军们意识到与拥有无法攻击的避难所的对手作战是多么困难。 乌克兰人使用波兰就像越共使用老挝和柬埔寨一样,休息和恢复,再训练和重新武装,然后重返战场。 如果普京做出与尼克松相同的决定,轰炸避难所,会发生什么? 反对它的人担心扩大战争; 如果俄罗斯人在波兰尝试,人们应该担心同样的事情。

  396. gatobart 说:
    @Thim

    “俄罗斯需要一位愿意战斗的新领导人。”

    俄罗斯二十年来一直迫切需要的东西,因为很久以前人们就痛苦地清楚地认识到弗拉基米尔·普京不是这样的人。

  397. @acementhead

    自由法西斯女权主义者,许多世界经济论坛青年全球领袖项目的校友,在权力上不可避免地是灾难性的。在我看来,她们仍然是那些为了取悦男性而社会化和进化的要求的受害者。
    无论是索罗斯、盖茨、施瓦布还是奥巴马,他们都需要表现出对晋升的“渴望”,以及对普京这样的“流氓男”应有的仇恨。她们认为自己获得了解放,但她们比以往任何时候都更受男性控制。还有最坏的男人。撒切尔则不同,虽然她时不时地使出“诡计”,但她的意识形态却是灾难性的。
    只要西方自由法西斯政权的动机是统治的欲望、当务之急,即使被令人厌恶地借口为西方超级公民的“文明使命”,政治中的女性就必须取消自己的性别,成为事实上的“跨性别”男性。只有谋求政治和社会、国家内部和国家之间的“和谐”,妇女才能在政治、外交和社会关系中发挥建设性的领导作用。如果男人们愿意的话,他们也可以成为“跨性别者”,尽管有很多建设性的男性美德也已经过时了。

    • 回复: @Anonymous
  398. @Wizard of Oz

    保罗·约翰逊(Paul Johnson)是一位狂热的 Sabbat Goy,他会欣赏布莱尔对部落的奉献。毕竟,众所周知,布莱尔的控制者迈克尔·“现金点”利维勋爵在首相办公室里像仆人一样命令布莱尔——而他确实是这样。布莱尔摧毁了伊拉克并杀害了大约一百万伊拉克人,证明了他的忠诚,这让犹太复国主义分子毫不掩饰地高兴。

    • 哈哈: Emil Nikola Richard
  399. Passing By 说:
    @El Ogro

    乌克兰加入北约只是俄罗斯对基辅政权的众多不满之一。促使俄罗斯最终介入的原因并不是乌克兰的成员国身份本身,而是基辅政权的行为方式。
    芬兰并没有一千万俄罗斯人可以成为民族主义极端分子的受害者。任何芬兰政权都不太可能接受建立一个使用当地俄罗斯人作为实验对象的生物实验室网络。芬兰也不太可能寻求获得核武器。
    Russian attitude towards Finland will entirely depend on what NATO will deploy in Finland. If it doesn’t pose an existential threat to Russia, Finns can do as suit them. Though at some point, they will likely have to import the electricity they’re lacking from elsewhere than Russia.

    • 同意: Dnought
  400. Stewbumer 说:

    战争不是今天才结束吗?俄罗斯赢了。

  401. j2 说:
    @showmethereal

    “You are confusing yourself… Your newest words don’t match your previous comment. Both parts can’t be true.”

    There is no confusion. You have not understood what I wrote. Read again and try to understand this time. Take your time, you will get there.

    “since the Soviet Union collapsed are you sitting here pretending Finland hasn’t been working with NATO behind the scenes??? ”

    Finland has quite openly (and not behind the scenes) built NATO compatibility in its defense forces and had exercises with NATO countries in the partnership in peace initiative, and later as a partner in NATO exercises. This has openly aimed to the capability to receive NATO military help if needed. Finland is not participating in any behind scene plans to invade Russia, once it did so and it ended into a defeat.

    • 回复: @bike-anarkist
  402. El Ogro 说:
    @anon

    There’s been suggestions that his grandmother was also Jewish. Lenin’s mother spoke Yiddish at home. Lenin also claimed not to know who his other grandfather was which is strange.

    Lenin’s early life is very mysterious. Many of his photos are obvious fakes. It’s almost as if he was just an actor playing a role.

  403. map 说:

    斯科特·里特(Scott Ritter)满嘴废话,此外,他可能是个怪人。

    看看他支持俄罗斯进攻乌克兰的理由:

    这是值得整体观看的。

    对里特来说,俄罗斯攻击乌克兰是有道理的,因为乌克兰到处都是纳粹分子。 Maidanists 和亚速旅已经完全占领了乌克兰,以至于泽连斯基实际上是这些纳粹分子的人质。 这段纳粹历史可以追溯到二战,当时“班德主义者”正忙于与德国人结盟,因为他们想维持乌克兰对所有非乌克兰人的霸权。 这些班德主义者忙于屠杀所有非乌克兰人,因为他们分享纳粹至上主义意识形态,即德国人……或……乌克兰人……或白人……或想要杀死所有人,而不是像他们一样的东西,我猜这意味着乌克兰人和德国人最终会成为像最后两只饥饿的老鼠一样互相争斗。

    当然,没有提到班德主义者在苏联手中面对大饥荒,或者当面临生存威胁时,有时你敌人的敌人就是你的朋友。 当然,他们站在纳粹一边是有道理的。 毕竟,没有一个德国人曾称班德拉为富农。 不,这个从历史事实中得出的明显结论不可能是真的。 不,俄罗斯正试图清除乌克兰内部的纳粹 DNA。

    这是一位军事分析家的“精彩”分析,他认为俄罗斯正在失败,因为它获胜的速度不够快。 或者,泽连斯基实际上是人质或其他一些废话。

    现实情况是乌克兰会输,而里特正在准备所有挥舞着乌克兰国旗并相信他们在 CNN 上看到的一切的 NPC。 他将通过解释乌克兰因所有纳粹分子而应得的失败来安抚他们。 那时一切都会好起来的,这件事将是记忆深刻的。

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  404. @Wizard of Oz

    Lizard of Ooz

    What is the object without the subject?
    (“objective truth” is Orwellian Doublespeak.)
    Truth is. And there is always only one truth.
    To describe truth, the subject and his observations are needed.
    Truth lives from and with personal observations and differentiations.
    The incarnate (hence personified) soul in its highest form (human) can know truth.
    You for one appear regularly more interested in your subjective arrogance,
    which is nothing but a deep seated personal feeling of inferiority; a mind problem.
    To pervert something like that further (down the negative line), the Jew stole and bloated “psychology” (and Big Pharma).
    Based on the inferiority of the subjects of the New World (OozUsCanNzer)…
    the Jew is able to terrorise “Old Europe”, hence “Jew & hyenas”. You & the Jew; your perennial anal fixation… Is that why you are constantly crawling up the Con Runzing’s ass?

    Keep going Uki Tiger and find the truth (everytime afresh).

  405. @Mefobills

    Sanctions were and are used effectively by the US to wreck the economies of smaller countries. But they backfired when used against Russia because it grows its own food, has its own military and transportation industry, has refrained from buying US Treasury bonds and doesn’t need to purchase and import raw materials from abroad. Russia is also not dependant on Western markets for sales of its cars and planes, household appliances, electronics, clothing and holiday destinations, because Westerners see all these products as inferior. So the main sanction measure that really hurt was the outright confiscation of gold and money reserves that the Russians had foolishly deposited in the West. They will never make that mistake again, but even if they will never see those 265 billion Dollars worth of savings back, their economy will not falter because of it.

    Even if China is not officially in the crosshairs yet, it has learned from the US/EU attempts to wreck Russia and Beijing knows that it is next in line, should Russia indeed have been brought to its knees. Already, China is reeling in its foreign deposits and is getting rid of the US value papers it gathered in the past. China has become convinced that the US is utterly unreliable and untrustworthy and no longer has any good intentions and motivations. Comments of Chinese politicians on US and EU agressions are very clear on that.

    So, China has been forewarned and is already preparing. It was reluctant in providing military support for the Russians, but it will go all out to support Russian and Indian strategies to wreck Dollar hegemony. The SWIFT banking code and credit card alternatives are in progress and even Saudi Arabia had picked up on the idea tbat freeing energy trading from Dollar chains is tbe way to go. All the Russian oil and gas not sold to Europe is eagerly absorbed by China and others, and is paid with any other currency than the Dollar.

    The Chinese have also understood that Germany, the only EU member with a fair bit of domestic manufacturing industry left, is now voluntarily destroying that. With the Belt and Road Initiative nearly completed and scores of long freight trains packed with Chinese products already entering Europe daily, the EU has made itself as much dependent on Chinese manufacturing as the US has. So, the West may freeze Chinese assets in the west and declare US Treasury bonds in Chinese ownership null and void, but China in return can manipulate goods logistics to the entire West. The West will have no purchasing/ sourcing/ manufacturing alternatives, as it has foolishly outsourced the lot. Elite billionaires have invested heavily in tbe Chinese supply chain and logistics, and Wall Street and the London City will likely follow, as the only US/EU things left worth investing in will be of financial or real estate nature.

    Furthermore, China has its own sourcing and logistics chain of raw materials from Africa, South America and Australia and has its own excellent transpirtation industry (trains, planes, ships, trucks). That’s another department where sanctions will be ineffective.

    Therefore, i agree with Gonzalo Lira that the hostilities towards China are likely to be military.

  406. j2 说:
    @Mikhail

    “From May 12, here’s a Scott Ritter interview indicating his belief that Russia will soon prevail in Donbass:”

    I have listened to two one hour interviews by Scott Ritter posted in earlier threads on this site. In the latter one he explained how the Donbass caudron will be closed in two weeks (this was three weeks before May 9. ) and then 60,000 Russians move West and take the whole Ukraine. Obviously it did not happen so. I am not motivated enough to listen what he now may predict. So far Western analysts have been much more correct than Scott Ritter, but Western analysts were systematically overestimating Russian strength. It was from them that Kiev would be taken in 72 hours. I have my own views on war and when this war started I shared the (let us say, traditional) opinion that Russia tried the invasion with too small forces to start with and that Kiev would not fall that easily if at all if Ukrainians defend their country with territorial defense as seemed to be the case.

    So far this war has not contained any surprises to me: it is very much as it should be in territorial defense. Ukraine defeated the initial strategic strike and managed to hide half of its aircraft to be used later. Its peacetime army withdrew and weakened Russian forces giving time for mobilization of the best trained reserves (1. and 2. echelon) in 1-2 months, after which Russia was forced to withdraw from Western Ukraine (it was a forced withdrawal, the supply lines of Russian troops were destroyed) and even from Sumy, later even from Kharkiv. The Russian idea of cutting the country from several places and taking Odessa failed, finally encircling the Donbass Joint Forces Operation troops failed. This all was done as it should have been in territorial defense. Keeping Mariupol was not something I would have done, but it made heroes and upgraded the spirit, and tied Russian troops, so maybe it was a good decision. Thus, starting the war from where it must be started: from the time when Ukraine had mobilized the 1. and 2. echelon reserves, Russian advances have been quite minor. Taking ground before the opponent tries to keep it does not count as great victories, so none of Russian advances before this time can be taken as a sign of any success.

    But I am still waiting for the Ukraine counteroffensive. Maybe they do not have the competence and strength, or the terrain is too difficult. You do realize that the Russian style of advancing in roads and then securing territory succeeds only in certain territory. By that style you get ambushed and encirculated in some other territory. But maybe Ukrainians will figure out how to use their territory and their strengths, and they will launch a major counteroffensive.

    Russia was expected to win this war and initially I expected that they will win. Now I am not so sure. But what is sure is that in a strategic sense Russia has lost this war. The geopolitical situation of Russia will be weaker after this war than it was before the war, and strategy aims just to the opposite result. It is also very clear that Russia has made many operational level mistakes. That shows that their armed forces are not up to the level that was expected. The best performance from Russians so far has been on tactical level. There they are not so bad and their low level commanders seem to be quite good. But as a total, this war is Russian failure whether they finally win it or not, and I do not think they can win as the West has decided that Putin will not win this war. That counts quite much since Russia is not so strong as believed.

  407. map 说:
    @Anon

    请记住,在美国军队中,文德曼上校是一位战争英雄。

  408. @John Johnson

    Johnson & Johnson (aka J & J – so named on his birth certificate because, as a member of the Jewish Sackler family of Purdue Pharma infamy, due to its central role in creating the opioid crisis that’s killed hundreds of thousands of Americans and the close ties the Sacklers had with the Johnson & Johnson Big Pharma behemoth), wrote:

    这场战争失败了,普京将在60天内死去。

    J & J has several times mentioned that Putin will soon be dead.
    Would you care to share with us why you think Putin’s demise is nigh ?

    [更多]

    What info have you been privy to within Unit 8200 of the IDF where you’re employed, that suggests Judeo miscreants like yourself have managed to slip some fast acting carcinogens into Putin’s food/beverages/toothpaste (?), like they did with Hugo Chavez ?

    Meanwhile, I have to give it to you, you’re good for a laugh. You write absurd things like this for example:

    我比斯科特、安格林或迈克更好地预测了这场战争的走向,这已经载入了我的历史。

    也许我应该在这里写博客,因为像您这样的许多发帖者似乎在没有强有力的指导的情况下无法辨别现实。

    We’ve seen your history and it’s nothing but wall to wall apologia for Zio criminality.

    Your block quoted remark is especially funny seeing as you’re the man who got everything wrong in relation to the Covid Psyop. eg:

    1) J & J: The hospitals are filled with the unvaccinated.
    Reality: The hospitals were disproportionately filled with the double and triple vaxxed.
    (To the extent that there were any ‘unvaccinated’ in the hospitals or morgues, they were in fact those that took the first jab, had a serious adverse reaction that required emergency hospitalisation OR said first jab killed them).
    However, seeing as they hadn’t yet taken the second clot shot, they were categorised as ‘unvaccinated’, since to be fully vaccinated you must have had the second or booster jabs AND simultaneously not died within 2 weeks of that second/third jab.

    2) J & J: The Covid vaxxes are safe.
    Reality: The Covid vaxxes have killed MORE in the first year of use than ALL the other seventy or so vaccines administered in the U.S combined have killed in the last 30 plus years in aggregate.

    Of all the DUMB-FUCKS spewing Zio B.S, you J & J are the dumbest of them all.
    And, on the Ukraine Special Operation Police Action undertaken by the Russians to neutralise the Judeo-Fascist Ukes, you’ve continued on in that vein with more wrong calls.

    你就是不能接受诡计,不是吗?

    If Winston Churchill was alive today, he’d describe you thus :

    Never in the field of human conflict has so much been gotten wrong, in so short a time frame by so few*.
    (‘Few’ as in one brain-dead imbecile called J & J)

    .

    • 回复: @John Johnson
  409. J.T. 说:

    我真希望猎隼能在这里像往常一样吹嘘俄罗斯人有多棒。

    • 回复: @Brewer
  410. Kaylene 说: • 您的网站

    Russia is doing magnificently in its demilitarisation of Ukraine to stop its nazi-infested military causing genocide to Russian speakers in the Donbass region. Russia is not just bombing and blitzing Ukraine as the US/NATO wars have brutally done with impunity for 20 years in their wars of aggression on many mainly Muslim countries this century. Because Russia is not just wanting to dominate by violence as western countries do, it’s far more difficult.
    Russia is providing humanitarian supplies to beleagured Ukraine regions, rescuing civilians, held as hostages by hideous Ukraine forces and is now providing essentials for Ukrainian soldiers who have surrendered; also getting treatment for wounded “enemy soldiers. It’s destroyed tonnes of weapons being sent by criminal western countries, who are entirely ignorant of the consequences of what they are doing. And then there’s the problem of sorting out the high level nazi criminals who are responsible for massacres and torture.
    What can we do to help, since Russia is defending the world from tyranny and the cruelty of white supremacist, neo-nazi ideology?

  411. Smith 说:

    我不太相信政治评论家。

    最好打开地图,看到战争的展开并保持开放的心态。

  412. @Charles Martel France

    弗拉基米尔大帝并不在西方。

  413. Backward 说:

    我宁愿认为这是一场针对“无用食者”的全球主义战争,为伟大的重置创造条件。这解释了为什么俄罗斯没有停止西方对乌克兰的援助,也没有使用决定性武力:“双方”都希望战争持续下去。

    • 同意: peterAUS
  414. @John Johnson

    Nuisance; fact free brazen insanity is your trademark.

    Everything you scribble – as part of the Kabal prop ups – just the opposite is true.

    The level of respect for Putin at home and abroad has never been greater. The JewWest is a sore looser. Have a look in the mirror.

  415. @peterAUS

    In response to commenter ‘FollyOfWar’ you said this:

    You are wrong. You consume too much MSM/American/Jewish propaganda.

    你,PeterAUS,你捍卫犹太-法西斯乌克兰政权,因为仅存的少数乌克兰军事营仍然具有凝聚力并具有任何进攻性军事能力的残余被击中地盘,只是在重复谈话要点,这些谈话要点可能直接来自CNN 广播或像 NYT 和中央情报局附属的华盛顿邮报这样的机构破烂。

    The IRONY that you, someone with a clear allegiance to neocon dictated U.S foreign policy and Anglo-Zionist global hegemony, would be saying such a thing.

    It’s not lost on the rest of us. You’ve become an embarrassment in this thread.

    • 回复: @IreneAthena
  416. Passing By 说:
    @Mefobills

    I forgot to mention the one key factor that is at the core of every manifestation of violence and that may actually be the principal cause of a pivot to war against China: frustration.
    If the “donor class” fails to achieve its goals pertaining to Russia, it will feel immensely frustrated and it will have to vent that frustration, it will feel the urge to lash out at someone, somewhere, anyone, anywhere. China is a good candidate b/c even if they got their way with regards to Russia, they would have gone after China next anyway. Business is lucrative now but they don’t control Beijing and the ultimate goal is full dominance. Moreover, given the American Right’s general attitude towards anything Chinese, they are confident that there will be little if any opposition at home initially.
    As I said, we look at things as rational people and we tend to overlook the fact that the people in power are more often than sometimes driven by irrational motives, and that they wouldn’t be where they are if they weren’t so.

  417. @peterAUS

    Where do you get these clowns from, as featured in your video ?

    The so-called expert, some British twat called Chip Chimp-man, lives up to his name when, after being asked if a short war is possible in Ukraine, he says:

    … the short war scenario, where the Russian army absolutely collapses.

    This sub-par primate of a man suffers from delusional paranoia.
    Is this the best you can do PeterAUS to make a case for the Judeo-Fascist Ukrainian regime coming out of this war without having copped one almighty shellacking ?

    You and your spiritual twin brother and serial troller Johnson & Johnson are really scraping the bottom of the barrel.

  418. 希望俄罗斯会绝望并用核武器渗透美国,并对美国的大城市进行报复……

  419. geokat62 说:
    @Avery

    这是哪里?
    向所有热心读者展示 UNZ.com.

    I think we’ve all waited an adequate period of time for JJ to accept your challenge, but he seems to be reluctant to either confirm or deny your serious allegation.

    I suspect it’s because he didn’t expect you to call his bluff.

    You see soon after he posted his comment, I did a quick search of his archive of comments using the keyword “Churchill” and came up empty re anything remotely resembling his opposition to the bombing of residential areas.

    It appears JJ was engaging in a bit of prevarication with the readers of UNZ.com.

    You should apologize for being a naughty boy, JJ, and promise to never try to intentionally deceive us again.

    Promise? … and don’t try crossing your fingers behind your back.

    • 同意: Avery
    • 回复: @Passing By
  420. Passing By 说:
    @geokat62

    Truth be told, Yohanan Ben-Yohanan would be a more fitting pseudo for JJ.

  421. Anonymous[313]• 免责声明 说:
    @frankie p

    请参见: https://www.bofit.fi/en/monitoring/weekly/2021/vw202104_3/
    诚然,这是估计的高端。

    中国做出了一个明智的决定,将所有债务“留在国内”,因为他们研究并了解了国际货币基金组织、世界银行、国际清算银行等西方机构是如何通过发行债券从不发达国家中提取资金的。债务。

    So the Chinese population (a) won’t have the money to lend to more internal projects and (b) will be more than a little bit upset that their money has been wasted.

    外国实体在中国的唯一投资是民营企业,比如恒大,现在正处于破产边缘,在国有银行的引导下进行重组和再融资。 我的猜测是,外国债券持有人将从这一行动中大幅削减。

    So, no more foreign investment, maybe trouble keeping their plants going because they can’t afford parts needed to repair failures, maybe trouble buying raw materials.

    Perhaps the capital goods could be used internally to mollify the Chinese debtors, and eventually entice new foreigners to lend again? The capital investments are not productive; they are in fact resource hogs. That’s what happened to the USSR – the value of their industrial production was less than the value of the raw materials it consumed, and was decreasing as their capital plant wore out and could not be replaced. They compensated by foreign goods purchase in exchange for raw materials until the raw materials needed for trade exceeded what their system had left over after consumption by USSR manufacturing. Eventually, the Russians switched over to their light manufacturing / raw materials sale.

    That’s what I’m referring to.

    如果你是现代货币理论的拥护者,当然,你可以不理会上述内容。

  422. Anon[385]• 免责声明 说:

    The Ukies have one big factor working against them: they are 100% reliant on US support and the US has proven to be fickle and unreliable as a long term backer. Just ask the Afghans who were recently abandoned. As soon as MSM propaganda wears out and even the stupidest Americans realize they are being taken for a ride, and that their broke country is loaning money to pay for the war of another broke country and their domestic economic situation deteriorates, America will drop Ukraine like a disposable diaper. The lesson that everyone should have learned long time ago: it is better to have good relationships with your neighbors than rely on an overseas power to support you.

    Many people here ask “was it worth it for Russia” but few are asking “was it worth it for Ukraine”, which stands to lose vast swaths of territory and potentially be landlocked for good – because once the Russian flag is hoisted, there is no power in the world that can take it down. All that Ukraine had to do to avert all this was to declare neutrality and respect the Minsk agreements.

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  423. The question then is what are others like, Larry Johnson, Colonel McGregor, Jacob Dreizen etc are saying. Do they agree with this assessment.

  424. Corvinus 说:

    “IMHO, Scott Ritter is gradually adjusting to the idea that the conflict in Ukraine is not a just regional skirmish between two quarrelsome neighbors, nor is it a proxy-war between NATO and Russia. No. Ukraine is the first phase of a broader plan for crushing Russia, collapsing its economy, removing its leaders, seizing its natural resources, splintering its territory, and projecting US power across Central Asia to the Pacific Rim. Ukraine is about hegemony, empire, and pure, unalloyed power. Most important, Ukraine is the first battle in a Third World War, a war that was concocted and launched by Washington to ensure another unchallenged century of American primacy.”

    This is off the rails commentary. Ritter is NOT making any of these implications nor suggestions. Rather, like any military analyst worth their salt, he is taking in new information and adjusting his position. Putin is seeking to crush his own nation for his own demented gains. The Russian people I have talked to understand that he uses his power to control the narrative, especially the press. And they highly doubt that Putin’s successor will continue with this war and risk further alienation. Ukraine is all about the people of that nation exercising sovereignty. Isn’t that what white people seek?

  425. Corvinus 说:
    @Anon

    “because once the Russian flag is hoisted, there is no power in the world that can take it down”

    Except Putin’s successors. Do they have the guile and gumption to have a permanent Russian presence in Ukraine?

    “it is better to have good relationships with your neighbors than rely on an overseas power to support you.”

    The more important lesson is that a sovereign people should be able to make their own decisions internally, and not have their neighbor insist to change those decisions to suit their own needs. It’s not their business.

    • 回复: @Anon
  426. @Zachary Smith

    @Zachary Smith-

    我也这么想。我得到了一所大学的“认可”,可以对军事历史发表评论,所以我一直相当密切地关注着这一切。
    Ritter 在 Duran YT 频道上的表现让我印象深刻。我还关注 SouthFront,并发现奇怪的是,一个公开表示其采取亲俄罗斯社论立场的网站显示俄罗斯人远远落后于里特先生的介绍。
    然后我从 Tom Luongo 的播客中听说 Ritter 过去遇到过一些麻烦,也许不应该那么容易被信任。
    俄罗斯似乎正在实施一项计划,连接空中机动部队占领的据点,直接威胁基尤,并可能迫使政变政权屈服。匕首刺向国会大厦,但未能实现这一目标,俄罗斯人必然从这个暴露的位置撤退,并专注于他们的实际目标,即巩固分裂的省份。
    所有正在进行的模仿战争都混淆了军事学生本应显而易见的事情。

  427. anon[401]• 免责声明 说:
    @John Johnson

    Other people may recognize (((John Johnson))) by his other handle “gay troll”

    • 回复: @Alrenous
  428. Greg S. 说:
    @Abbybwood

    >阿连斯基命令他们投降以挽救生命

    不,他没有,就像斯大林格勒的希特勒一样,他命令他们为了自己和纳粹祖国的荣耀而战至死。 他们忍饥挨饿、濒临死亡,不听命令投降。 然而,谎言帝国旋转事件的本质就是:旋转。

    然而,纳粹分子中的外国“顾问”问题以及他们可能要说的话确实是一个有趣的话题。 俄罗斯对这一切都非常非常含糊其辞。 也许只是他们的宣传很差劲,但你知道,如果形势逆转,帝国将全天候(24/7)在摄像机前巡游外国武装分子。 但俄罗斯比帝国更聪明、更成熟,可能会在幕后进行秘密谈判和交换囚犯,而不是拍照。 俄罗斯似乎无意在对抗帝国方面获得政治分数,甚至对打倒腐败的西方领导人不感兴趣,只有直接使俄罗斯受益的行动。 再说一次,我认为俄罗斯确切地知道他们在西方正在面对什么,因为当前的西方在很多方面类似于旧苏联(另一个谎言帝国)。 还有什么对俄罗斯更有利:让腐败的小丑掌管西方国家(拜登、特鲁多、约翰逊、马克龙——全都是欺诈和出卖),还是西方拥有聪明、强大的民族主义领导人? 我认为俄罗斯并不害怕那些小丑,因为俄罗斯知道他们都是反社会者,只真正关心自己。 这种类型的领导人不会参加核战争,也不会做任何严重危及他们唯一真正关心的事情的事情:他们自己。 只有年老的拜登才是未知因素,因为我们真的不知道谁在控制他,但很可能只是更多的反社会者:奥巴马、克林顿夫妇、“大迈克”等。

  429. Greg S. 说:
    @Irish Savant

    我不同意:俄罗斯已经百分百准备好的西方“制裁”,讽刺的是,西方却没有做好准备,这种制裁不可能自行到来。

    俄罗斯还强烈希望至少夺回乌克兰东部的俄语地区——该地区一直是俄罗斯文明的“中心地带”,在苏联解体后恰巧登陆俄罗斯境外。 就像克里米亚一样,俄罗斯一直在寻找收回主权的方法,并且能够利用软弱和腐败的西方领导层来实现这一目标。 正如我已经说过的,俄罗斯为此付出的成本相对便宜,至少到目前为止是这样。 他们唯一的失败是在政治和宣传领域。 暂时的。 他们夺取的土地,他们将永远保留。

    因此,俄罗斯收回了自己的土地,将数百万讲俄语的人纳入自己的保护伞下,使帝国流血不止,并加速了其不可避免的崩溃。 至少这是计划。 他们对西方所做的事情就像西方对苏联所做的那样。

    • 回复: @Anonymous
  430. Anon[385]• 免责声明 说:
    @Corvinus

    Except Putin’s successors. Do they have the guile and gumption to have a permanent Russian presence in Ukraine?

    I assure you that no Putin successor, unless a Western puppet, will ever return territory that Russia spent blood and treasure on. You seem not to understand that the territories that Russia is integrating are populated by mostly Russian speakers and supporters who for the most part are much happier to being Russian citizens than of a backward failed corrupt state ruled by extremist anti-Russian Ukrainian nationalists.

    The more important lesson is that a sovereign people should be able to make their own decisions internally, and not have their neighbor insist to change those decisions to suit their own needs. It’s not their business.

    The lesson that Ukraine is learning is exactly the opposite. If you initiate hostile policies towards your neighbor, which is threatened by an expanding NATO alliance, you should take into consideration that your actions have consequences. Ukies lost Crimea in 2014 and still kept poking the bear. They won’t be poking the bear no more when this is all said and done at the risk of losing their entire country.

    • 同意: RadicalCenter
    • 回复: @Corvinus
  431. Outraged 说:

    我完全同意迈克的观点。
    这从来不仅限于美国与俄罗斯战斗到最后一个乌克兰人。
    帝国想要俄罗斯的土地、水域和资源,他们愿意杀死每一个俄罗斯人来获得它们。
    这只是第一步。俄罗斯可以完全征服乌克兰(计划并非如此),但这并不重要。
    不从源头上阻止,帝国是不会停下来的。

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  432. Corvinus 说:
    @Anon

    “I assure you that no Putin successor, unless a Western puppet, will ever return territory that Russia spent blood and treasure on.”

    I heard that message when the USSR was in Afghanistan and it left with its tail between its legs after a decade of supposedly “winning”. And should the next leader of Russia decide to leave Ukraine, how are you certain that decision is based upon he being a “puppet”? Could not that choice be merely based on reason and logic on what is in the best interest of the Russian people?

    “You seem not to understand that the territories that Russia is integrating are populated by mostly Russian speakers and supporters who for the most part are much happier to being Russian citizens”

    In some cases I imagine.

    “ than of a backward failed corrupt state ruled by extremist anti-Russian Ukrainian nationalists.”

    There is decidedly more corruption in Russia under Putin, who is ex KGB and a backer of oligarchs. Putin has made his money at the expense of his own people.

    The lesson that Ukraine is learning is exactly the opposite. If you initiate hostile policies towards your neighbor, which is threatened by an expanding NATO alliance, you should take into consideration that your actions have consequences. Ukies lost Crimea in 2014 and still kept poking the bear. They won’t be poking the bear no more when this is all said and done at the risk of losing their entire country.

    • 回复: @Commentator Mike
  433. Corvinus 说:
    @Outraged

    乌克兰白人没有代理权吗? 他们没有自由就什么对他们内部最有利做出自己的决定吗?

    • 回复: @DevilAdvocate
  434. Corvinus 说:
    @map

    大声笑,所以现在里特是个吓人的,因为他有胆量根据新证据重新评估。

    “对里特来说,俄罗斯攻击乌克兰是有道理的,因为乌克兰到处都是纳粹分子。”

    符合此描述的人口百分比是多少? 就数字而言,球场数字是多少? 你怎么知道的? 消息来源将有助于支持您的案例。

    此外,你的意识形态不是建立在亲白人、反移民、反犹太人和反女权主义的纳粹主义信条上吗?

    “不,俄罗斯正试图清除乌克兰内部的纳粹 DNA。”

    那么,如果普京如此关心乌克兰纳粹主义,为什么几年前他不做出这种努力呢? 过去十年中是否有任何文件或演讲表明他对这种据称渗透和统治乌克兰的哲学的关注?

    “现实是乌克兰将要输……”

    也许。 再说一次,也许不是。 此外,您有多大把握普京的继任者将在未来几十年继续致力于控制其统治下的乌克兰地区? 为什么?

    • 回复: @karel
    , @map
  435. Patricus 说:
    @showmethereal

    这很简单。 芬兰和瑞典目睹了俄罗斯入侵一个主权国家。 他们担心未来的俄罗斯侵略他们的方向。 两国在冷战期间都保持中立。

    • 回复: @Bri Guy
  436. martin_2 说:
    @Irish Savant

    That’s what I was thinking. There might have been better options than war. Starve the West of raw materials.

  437. @Truth Vigilante

    J & J has several times mentioned that Putin will soon be dead.
    Would you care to share with us why you think Putin’s demise is nigh ?

    1. Better explanation for the invasion than the four different reasons he has given. He is most likely dying and wanted to take Ukraine for the empire as part of his legacy. That is why he never opened a line of diplomacy or gave an ultimatum before invading. The goal was to take the country and install a puppet government. NATO was an excuse (the first one) and it wouldn’t have mattered if Ukraine offered a neutrality pact.

    2. Gripping the table the entire time during the staged interview.

    3. Skipping the hockey game that he never misses.

    4. Inconsistent/odd behavior like giving completely different responses to Finland wanting to join NATO. Strange and limited interviews, TV appearances.

    5. US/British intelligence most likely has a mole inside the Kremlin. They knew the details of the planned invasion before anyone else. Even Ukraine doubted the report until the actual invasion. Well they believe that he is seriously sick.

    COVID is over so try to stay on topic.

    告诉你什么…。

    普京不会到 1 月 XNUMX 日。 如果我错了,我不会在今年余下的时间在 Whiteny 或 Anglin 上发帖。 如果我是对的,你必须在任何回应中称我为阁下。

    • 回复: @Bri Guy
  438. @anon

    look at what his name is slang for, realize this is a thoughtful warning

  439. @Ace

    Satan rules.

    Not since January.

  440. Mulegino1 说:
    @Anon

    俄罗斯将占上风。 谨慎和谨慎的做法是因为乌克兰东部居住着与俄罗斯关系密切的人。 有没有头脑正常的人相信,如果他们愿意,俄罗斯无法将哈尔科夫和基辅夷为平地?

    我完全同意。

    俄罗斯并不是在任何好莱坞奇幻时间表上发动战争,也不是为了信息娱乐贫民的利益,他们通过观看有线电视新闻上的“震撼和敬畏”烟花来获得多巴胺。 大多数美国人已经习惯性地认为,所有战争都应该像美国政府对伊拉克和格林纳达等超级大国发动的轻松远征战争一样。

    乌克兰 民政事务总署 欧洲最大的军队(俄罗斯除外),并接受了与北约部队互操作性的训练。 安德烈·马尔蒂亚诺夫所称的“联合武装执法行动”的俄罗斯主要目标之一是使乌克兰非军事化,这不仅仅意味着击败其实地部队,还意味着摧毁其军事基础设施和指挥控制能力。 俄罗斯正在有条不紊、彻底地这样做。 VSU此时只能进行小规模、高度本地化的操作。

    将领土防卫军拖入一支 大众汽车 在东方开战是一场悲剧和反人类罪。 这些是 16 至 60 岁的未经训练的男子,他们没有接受过在顿巴斯进行的那种战斗的训练。 基辅政权的道德败坏令人作呕。

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  441. nickels 说:

    Ritter supports abortion. That means he is a retard.

  442. @Truth Vigilante

    Unless I’m misunderstanding, the “type 1”statements and “type 2” statements in his comment were intentionally labeled as such to indicate that they are coming from opposing points of view.

    To avoid confusion and needless alienation, I would’ve chosen different phrases from the ones peterAUS used to describe “type 1” and “type 2.”
    Instead of using “Putin-tards” for “type 1,” it could be acknowledged that type 1 not only includes Russians who either believe, or are trolling for, everything that comes from Russia’s censored pro-Putin press, but ALSO includes Westerners who are so disgusted by the lying pro-Zelensky pro-NATO State-managed press in their OWN countries, that they are moved to cheer for the “other team,” Putin’s.

    Type 2, with the ambiguous label “normal people,” includes “low information” Americans who stuck Ukraine flags in their yard in February 2022 without knowing anything about Victoria Nuland’s 2014 coup. We’re also aware of “Type 2” people who troll for that pro-NATO position. But “type 2” ALSO includes Russians who are suspicious of the war propaganda coming from their own country.

    With such powerfully oppressive enemies that we all have, I don’t like to see common people worldwide — who might become allies — reflexively slapping the “troll,” Nazi, or Zionist label on one another.

    • 回复: @peterAUS
  443. Corvinus 说:
    @Mulegino1

    Days before Russia began its invasion on February 24, an estimated 190,000 personnel were stationed around Ukraine’s borders. At that time, the independent news website Meduza reported that conscripted soldiers had been forced to sign contracts that saw them sent to the Ukraine border.

    目前,大多数估计认为,大约 25% 的俄罗斯军队由应征入伍者组成,每个军种和单位类型之间的数量各不相同。 然而,俄罗斯公众对征兵的支持有限,征兵的部署也存在争议。 由于服役期限制了他们的训练,应征入伍者的能力通常不如签约的同行。 虽然更长的征兵期会导致征兵部队更有能力,但这样的决定将被证明不受俄罗斯公众的欢迎。

    此外…

    • 回复: @Mulegino1
  444. Bri Guy 说:
    @John Johnson

    Re 1.  Putin tried to negotiate, to get Ukraine to honour the Minsk Agreements, many times and was rebuffed/ignored.

    • 回复: @John Johnson
  445. Bri Guy 说:
    @Patricus

    如果这就是他们所看到的全部,他们错过了一半的图片。
    自 2014 年以来,乌克兰政府一直在对主要俄罗斯东部省份发动战争,并且无视明斯克协议。

  446. TheMoon 说:

    即使是我读过的那些认为俄罗斯会获胜的人也从未说过这会是在公园里散步那么简单。

    我的意思是,美国不像美国那样只攻击第三世界的狗屎。

    • 同意: Mulegino1
  447. @Corvinus

    Afghanistan was different. There are no Russians living in Afghanistan unlike in large parts of the Ukraine.

  448. Sendejo 说:

    Scott Ritter believes the Holocaust, stating emphatically in his most recent YouTube podcast that Nazis “murdered 30,000 Jews in Babi Yar.”

    I like Scott, and will entertain his analyses. But, I am skeptical about the accuracy of the military and geopolitical analyses of anyone who has yet to discover the Holohoax is nothing but an international extortion racket.

    • 回复: @mulga mumblebrain
  449. peterAUS 说:
    @IreneAthena

    你知道,真的,没有必要解释/原谅/澄清我在这里写的东西。
    任何人都可以自由地以任何他/她想要的方式接受我的帖子。

    您发布帖子并看到反应。 这告诉你,真的,你需要知道的关于海报的一切。 快速选择过程开始。
    粗鲁,一/两个衬里你只是忽略。
    更长的时间,有些知识渊博,有些则没有。 从那时起,您将忽略后者,除非他们正确地要求澄清。
    在那些知识渊博的人中,你可以立即看到他们是否在你的波长上。
    那么你有两个选择:
    与后者辩论,或者只是与前者交谈。

    现在……这里有很多人,出于各种原因,都开始辩论了。 我不。 经验,尤其是在 The Scamdemic 之后。
    我认为这是毫无意义的浪费时间。 在一些(长时间的)在线辩论之后,也许有 5% 的人(高层)可以改变他们的核心立场。 也许。 值得你花时间、精力、精力吗? 对某些人来说,是的。 对我来说绝对是“不”。
    我更喜欢将这些时间、精力和精力用于其他事情。

    无论如何,我的看法。

    • 回复: @DevilAdvocate
    , @IreneAthena
  450. @Corvinus

    当世界由几个大国共享时,不,他们没有那种自由。
    是对还是错? 没关系,现实是每个小州都必须选择自己的一方。

    早在 2014 年(甚至更早),乌克兰就做了一个非常糟糕的选择。
    他们选择了今天不关心他们的公民和国家的一方,宁愿牺牲他们所有人,烧毁他们所有的土地,以实现他的地缘政治目标。

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  451. Mulegino1 说:
    @Corvinus

    当伏尔加联邦军队明显计划发动重大攻势以夺回独立的顿涅茨克和卢甘斯克人民共和国时,SMO 就开始了。 这是一个先发制人的行动。 兵力集中在东部就清楚地表明了这一点。

    甚至亲乌克兰的欧安组织也承认,在俄罗斯开始敌对行动之前的几天里,VSU 对平民区和基础设施的炮击力度很大。 这完全违反了明斯克协议。

    “人民公仆”埃连斯基还威胁要获取核武器,这很可能是在布兰登政府中他的傀儡们的要求下。 政府里挤满了新保守主义犹太复国主义者,他们渴望在欧洲爆发一场大战。 这样的冲突符合布兰登自己的政治利益——或者他的上司所认为的他的利益——分散了他灾难性的总统任期和他家族的巨大腐败的注意力,就像一场北约-犹太复国主义代理人战争一样,其最终目标是恢复可萨政权。可汗国。

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  452. @peterAUS

    现在……这里有很多人,出于各种原因,都开始辩论了。 我不。 经验,尤其是在 The Scamdemic 之后。
    我认为这是毫无意义的浪费时间。 在一些(长时间的)在线辩论之后,也许有 5% 的人(高层)可以改变他们的核心立场。 也许。 值得你花时间、精力、精力吗? 对某些人来说,是的。 对我来说绝对是“不”。
    我更喜欢将这些时间、精力和精力用于其他事情。

    这就提出了为什么你一直来这里的问题……
    只是为了炫耀你的禁忌知识? 激怒人?

    至于我,我确实相信,如果能说服5%的人并改变立场,那已经是一个巨大的胜利。 哪怕只有1%。
    因为这个想法是传播事物:
    迭代 1 --- 5% 班次 -> 95% 剩余
    迭代 2 — 5% x 95% 班次 –> 90,25% 剩余
    迭代 3 --- 5% x 90,25% –> 85,7% 剩余
    ....
    迭代 15 —- 5% x 51,3% —> 48,7% 剩余

    所以,到现在为止,大多数人都在改变他们的立场。
    事实上,它应该走得更快,因为那些改变立场的人会(我们希望如此)传播真实的观点,所以这个数字应该逐渐上升,而不是仅仅达到 5%。

    • 同意: IreneAthena
  453. @j2

    Finland has quite openly (and not behind the scenes) built NATO compatibility in its defense forces and had exercises with NATO countries in the partnership in peace initiative, and later as a partner in NATO exercises.

    …and of course being a de facto NATO partner had the full ascent of the Finnish citizenry; like wise Sweden.

    When are the referendums occurring?

    • 回复: @j2
  454. @Bri Guy

    Re 1. Putin tried to negotiate, to get Ukraine to honour the Minsk Agreements, many times and was rebuffed/ignored.

    Wrong. Putin didn’t answer the phone to Ukraine prior to the invasion:
    https://iravaban.net/en/370801.html

    There was never an ultimatum or any demands. No attempt at diplomacy and they also wouldn’t take calls from the US.

    Putin said nothing about Minsk. His first explanation for the war was NATO:
    https://thebulletin.org/2022/02/putin-says-ukraine-membership-in-nato-would-make-nuclear-war-more-likely/

    Ukraine didn’t qualify for NATO nor were they invited. Furthermore if the goal was restricting them from NATO then first demanding that they join a neutrality pact made far more sense than launching a 1939 style invasion. And it was half assed compared to Hitler’s invasion of Poland.

    It was a BS excuse as seen by the fact that he has since changed his reason to protecting Donbass:
    https://www.republicworld.com/world-news/russia-ukraine-crisis/putin-says-stopping-ukraines-genocide-in-donbass-was-special-military-operations-goal-articleshow.html

    Unlike PutinNET and PutinTV we have a record of his inconsistent statements.

    He is dying and tried to take Ukraine for the empire. He failed and the FSB will finish him off before the fall.

    • 巨魔: Olivier1973
  455. peterAUS 说:

    Azovstal, Mariupol, three realities, briefly.

    1. Putintards
    The de-nazification of Ukraine has been completed. Nazi forces have been destroyed; most killed and the remnants captured.
    The victory in Mariupol broke morale of Ukrainian Armed Forces. They now realize that “resistance if futile”. Especially in urban environment.
    2. Russophobes
    After magnificent resistance the members of Azov regiment, with attachments, have been evacuated. RF Armed Forces there have exhausted themselves in the battle and are incapable of further participation in war. The city, itself, is like Dresden/Hiroshima/whatever.
    The heroic defense of Mariupol lifted spirits of defenders of the homeland and showed how to fight and win this war.
    3. Normals
    The battle for Mariuopol is over. After surprisingly effective and long resistance, remnants of defender forces surrendered.
    The battle has shown quite poor MOUT capability of RF Armed Forces which the Ukrainian side will seek to exploit in future combat.
    The future of captured soldiers remain unclear; it’s realistic to expect a lot of “play” behind closed doors of warring parties in months to come.

    • 巨魔: Olivier1973
    • 回复: @IreneAthena
    , @Olivier1973
  456. Corvinus 说:
    @Mulegino1

    As I suspected, you fail to address your hypocrisy. You stated it was a “crime against humanity” for untrained men to be conscripted. That is EXACTLY what Russia is doing/has done. Instead of acknowledging it, you ramp up the pro-Putin rhetoric.

    • 回复: @Mulegino1
  457. @peterAUS

    You could take the advice to avoid lumping a quite diverse group “type 1” under the derogatory blanket term “Putin-tards.” None of the points you are trying to make would suffer, and rather than pointless arguments being started, more people might be finding — and sharing ideas on — common ground, e.g. preparing for what what the World Economic Forum has in mind, Global Pandemic Treaty, etc.

    I’m ALL FOR avoiding pointless arguments, so you can take my advice, or leave it, but I wish you would take it.
    (Granted, I’m currently at a loss for a less alienating blanket term that would serve. I notice you occasionally add an “I’m no fan of Zelensky’s either” disclaimer, which helps to temporarily clear these VERY muddied waters. )

    • 回复: @peterAUS
  458. Corvinus 说:
    @DevilAdvocate

    “When the world is shared by just a few large and powerful states, NO, they don’t have that liberty.”

    Don’t be ridiculous. by your own metric, the Jews in Israel have legitimate authority to strong arm anyone into their camp. Each nation is sovereign. “Weak” states are not inherent vassals of “strong states”–geopolitics are the root cause for such designations.

    “Is it right or wrong ? Doesn’t matter, the reality is every small state must choose his side.”

    他们自己的一面,不管他们的邻国或更强大的国家。

    “And Ukraine did a very bad choice, back in 2014 (and even before).”

    根据谁/谁?

    “They picked the side who today doesn’t care a bit about their citizens and their country, preferring to sacrifice them all, and to burn all their land, to attain his geopolitical objectives.”

    No, the Ukrainians on their own behalf chose to become closer to the West. That is ultimately their decision to make. Why must they submit to become Putin’s bitch? Just because he (and you) say they ought to?

    • 同意: peterAUS
    • 回复: @DevilAdvocate
  459. Bri Guy 说:

    Russia must be doing something right as its ruble is stronger than before the conflict started.

    • 回复: @Avery
  460. @John Johnson

    如果你想追随那个穿着踏步鞋、轰炸产房的独裁者,那就继续吧。

    我认为你的消息来源是真理部。

  461. Mulegino1 说:
    @Corvinus

    俄罗斯没有派遣应征入伍者参加直接战斗。

    到目前为止,它只投入了一小部分兵力。 顿巴斯的大部分地面战斗是由民主民主联盟武装部队和卡德罗夫的车臣人进行的。

    即使俄罗斯确实派遣应征入伍者参战,这也与乌克兰所做的不一样。 应征入伍者接受基本训练和高级步兵训练。

    基辅目前派往前线的领土防卫部队人员几乎没有接受过战斗训练。 正如我之前写的,它相当于 大众汽车
    柏林战役期间的军队。 结果不太好。

    • 回复: @Avery
    , @Corvinus
  462. peterAUS 说:
    @IreneAthena

    …more people might be finding — and sharing ideas on — common ground, e.g. preparing for what what the World Economic Forum has in mind, Global Pandemic Treaty, etc…..

    That’s an interesting point. Disagree.

    Having said that, what are YOUR ideas on how to prepare for what the World Economic Forum has in mind?

    Speaking of which, just yesterday, had a contractor doing some work around my house. HE initiated a conversation re The Scamdemic. Started quite well , proceeded with nano tech in the vax for, apparently, “remote control”, and finished with adrenochrome.
    My experience, where I live, is that around 70% of people who are against lockdowns are like that guy. Any thoughts about this?

    • 回复: @IreneAthena
  463. @Corvinus

    你生活在一个幻想的世界。
    有一天你会醒来吗?… 怀疑,看着你如何坚持自己有趣的理想。

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  464. @peterAUS

    Ok, good, three categories up from two is definitely a move in the right direction. Category 1 needs refinement still, but I’ve already said all I need to say about that today.

  465. @peterAUS

    我很想听听你,恶魔倡导者和真相义务警员讨论“可以做些什么来准备”。 一些实用的想法可能会出现,也许是一种友情。

    我的小贡献:在您的现金失去更多价值之前购买必需品(例如,保质期长的食物、种子、坚固的园艺设备)。 (关于 vax 讨论,我倾向于相信我亲眼看到的数据,例如 VAERS 或黄牌系统上可用的数据。我知道我们都发现 James Corbett 是一个有用的信息来源注射以及 WEF、Great Reset 等)。

    我必须在这里停下来,否则上班迟到!

  466. Avery 说:
    @Bri Guy

    The main reason is that Russia will sell oil and natural gas to “unfriendly” countries 仅由 for Rubles. So in effect Ruble becomes hard currency, backed by valuable commodities.
    EU made grandiose noises about not paying in Rubles when Putin laid down the law, but slowly, quiet they ,那恭喜你, 支付。

    What will come next is Russia will demand Rubles for other valuable commodities it sells, like strategic, rare minerals and such, wheat, barley, buckwheat,……

    And Kremlin has floated the idea of further backing the Ruble with gold reserves.

    • 回复: @mulga mumblebrain
  467. Avery 说:
    @Mulegino1

    {结果不太好。}

    确实: 大众汽车 在行动。

    [Downfall – Panzer Alarm! T-34 Panzerfaust Scene. Battle of Berlin.]

    • 回复: @Mulegino1
  468. anon[138]• 免责声明 说:

    Baghdad BobAUS is here with the cope: the victorious heroes of Azovstal have elected to pursue other opportunities.

    In other news, NATO has appointed Adm. Olsen as chief NATO delegate to the Khabarovsk convention on who gets to go to Siberia for banned biological weapons.

    • 回复: @RobinG
  469. Anastasia 说:

    Another brilliant article by Whitney. Ritter simply does not understand Putin’s objectives.

  470. peterAUS 说:
    @IreneAthena

    I’d love to hear you, Devil Advocate and Truth Vigilante discussing “what can be done to prepare.” Some practical ideas might come forth and maybe a sense of camaraderie.

    我知道了。

    My small contribution: Buy essentials (example, food with long shelf life,seeds, sturdy gardening equipment) and soon before your cash loses much more value.

    谢谢。

  471. Turk 152 说:

    Anyone who is certain that Scott is wrong and claims to know what our reality will be in 2 months with any kind of certain, is not credible; is all we have at this point are likely, probable and unlikely scenarios. There are many variables and events that could occur if certain other events occur which we wont know until they occur. For instance, what is the impact of the $40 billion, nothing, everything, or somewhere in between. What is the impact of Sweden and Finland? Again, who knows. What happens if either Russia or the US/NATO suffer a complete humiliating loss that results in a clear cut loss of power for the US or a colonization/decapitation of Russia? Will nuclear weapons be deployed? Nobody has those realities in front of them, so we are just guessing on outcomes, those decisions have not been made yet. We are in unchartered territory and dont need false prophets.

  472. RobinG 说:
    @anon

    …Adm. Olsen as chief NATO delegate to the Khabarovsk convention…

    Okay, first, Adm. Olsen’s presence 分析数据 in the theater has NOT been confirmed. 2nd, surrender of officer corps also not yet confirmed.

    Ukrainian troops, not commanders, surrender at Azovstal
    “Top-ranking Ukrainian commanders at Mariupol’s Azovstal steelworks are still inside the plant and have yet to surrender, local media quoted pro-Russian separatist leader Denis Pushilin as saying on Wednesday””
    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/ukrainian-troops-not-commanders-surrender-at-azovstal/ar-AAXpEjs?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=d1c551bd60884ccabc5a740fccdb7eb4

    • 回复: @Commentator Mike
    , @Wokechoke
  473. Disciple2 说:
    @Richard B

    我认为很明显,JSI就是金砖国家联盟。以色列是“一带一路”倡议的中心枢纽。自 1948 年以色列成立以来,历任总理都是乌克兰或波兰布尔什维克出身。如今,以色列有 250 家 Kabutz。它是俄罗斯布尔什维克犹太前哨国家。以色列的网络安全主导地位归功于 8200 部队中出身的年轻俄罗斯软件人才。这就是伪装的俄罗斯。
    犹太复国主义控制下的美国人都是骗子。他们正在思考新美国世纪计划。再想一想。他们正在走向并引发自己的核毁灭。俄罗斯自60世纪50年代以来就已经完善了标量武器。汤姆·比尔登上校的报告宣称俄罗斯的能力比美国领先25年。我们甚至无法赶上高超音速导弹等常规武器。你可以看到美国在过去 XNUMX 年里的大规模解体。我们注定会被扔进历史的垃圾箱。所有西方国家都和我们一起走。这个计划就是让世界经济论坛失败!!!!盎格鲁撒克逊人受到诅咒和消灭。我也不赞成这个,但这是对现在正在发生的事情的事实回顾。
    上帝与你同在!

    • 回复: @mulga mumblebrain
  474. Mulegino1 说:
    @Avery

    你能想象微软全国广播公司(MSNBC)“军事分析师”马尔科姆·南斯(Malcolm Nance)处于那种情况吗?

    他唯一的用途是反坦克屏障。

  475. Corvinus 说:
    @Mulegino1

    “Russia is not sending conscripts into direct combat.”

    Yes, they have and they are. It has been well-documented. You simply don’t want to believe it.

    https://www.reuters.com/world/conscripts-sent-fight-by-pro-russia-donbas-get-little-training-old-rifles-poor-2022-04-04/

    “Even if Russia did send conscripts into battle, that would not be the equivalent of what Ukraine is doing. Conscripts undergo basic training and advanced infantry training.”

    Doesn’t matter. By YOUR metric, countries that use conscripts are committing”crime against humanity” It makes no difference regarding how many or how little. What matters is that Russia is clearly engaging in that conduct.

    你是个伪君子。

    • 回复: @peterAUS
    , @Olivier1973
  476. Jimmy4 说:
    @John Johnson

    “如果你想坚持……轰炸产房的独裁者,那就继续吧。”

    “普京是一个大规模谋杀的独裁者,他只想在最后的日子里玩一场战争游戏。”

    嘿,((约翰·约翰逊)),成为一个反社会的骗子是什么感觉?

    • 回复: @Wayne Gabler
  477. peterAUS 说:
    @Corvinus

    Actually….there is a bit more there.
    Offensive vs defensive missions.

    When RF sends conscripts we know, now, they aren’t well trained, equipped and led for OFFENSIVE operations. Especially in urban environment.

    When Ukraine sends conscripts we know that they trained enough, are well equipped and reasonably well led for DEFENSIVE operations. Especially in urban environment.

    One could see, with ease, that Ukrainian defense is based on urban strongpoints.

    A platoon of conscripts could be trained, for static defense, on their home (urban) terrain, in three weeks.

    A platoon of conscripts could be trained, for offense, in enemy’s home (urban) terrain in 3 months. At least. And I am talking SAS approach to training, 无疑 not that one used by RF.

    • 回复: @j2
  478. 确实,只要北约能够派出装备和代理士兵,战斗就会继续下去。一旦顿巴斯和卢甘斯克不再受到“恐怖分子”的侵害,俄罗斯就可以向北约成员国发动战争,从比利时和丹麦开始,向英国、法国和德国表明,他们的基地并不比他们在西方国家的训练设施更“安全”。乌克兰。
    布鲁塞尔不会关心比利时以外的任何国家。银行家们并不以“战斗到最后一个儿童银行家倒下”而闻名。

  479. @Jimmy4

    你确定你已经确定了道德低到零的一方吗?

    马德琳·奥尔布赖特 – 500,000 万伊拉克儿童的死亡对于伊拉克不存在的大规模杀伤性武器来说是值得的

  480. @RobinG

    So how many are left there and what can be expected of them to do? Commit mass suicide rather than surrender and reveal classified information and face war crimes tribunals and the publicity damaging to Ukraine and NATO? Is that what they have been ordered to do and are now deliberating?

    • 回复: @Olivier1973
  481. Moses22 说:

    Consider the effect this ‘SMO’ has had on Russia: the ruble is at its highest in several years, and Russia internally is unified. China has their back, and many key countries are refusing point blank to support Western sanctions.

    Meanwhile in Europe and the US… Does one need to elaborate?

    I think Putin would like this war to go on for as long as possible.

    • 回复: @Passing By
    , @Olivier1973
  482. Wokechoke 说:
    @RobinG

    It will be a bunch of yids.

  483. @Anonymous

    As for China: sanctions will not be the weapon of choice. The Chinese government is indeed in deep debt, but mostly to domestic banks. China has not borrowed money from other nations and a lot of other nations owe lots of money to China, especially the US. Also, the Chinese own a lot of infrastructure and real estate in the US. Furthermore, the US and EU were so foolish to throw away much of their economic autonomy and outsourced much of their manufacturing capabalities

    • 回复: @mulga mumblebrain
  484. Passing By 说:
    @Moses22

    If there weren’t dead and wounded, yes.

  485. j2 说:
    @bike-anarkist

    “When are the referendums occurring?”

    Surely you understand what a referendum is and how and when it is used. Issues like joining NATO are decided by those political leaders whose task it is (and who have themselves been elected to represent the people). In Finland joining NATO is decided by the president. In Sweden (I think but am not sure) by the king. A referendum may be requested by politicians (or any other, like journalists) in order to gauge if there is popular support from a decision, but the political leaders who decide the matter do not need to call for a referendum. They only do so if they need to gauge the popular support. In the case of joining NATO deciding political leaders in both countries decided that opinion polls of the population and positions of the parties in the parliament show the popular support without a need for a referendum. There was and will not be any referendum, the decisions are made.

    If you are not fully ignorant, you must have understood what a referendum is, so why did you decide to ask me to explain this to you as to a child?

  486. @peterAUS

    What about Mariupol was liberated?

    Compare with Fallujah when the yankees did not have to care about the inhabitants.

    Effective and long resistance? LOL. Hiding among civilians who voted at 85% for the autonomy of Donetsk, taking civilians as shields, hiding in the buildings and not letting the civilians flee, killing the civilians like for fun, yes behaving like nazis.

    Effective resistance while hiding in the underground of Azovstal like rats? LOL

    You do not even understand that Russians are not in a hurry, time is on their side.

    Denazification is on its way: azov is not only in Mariupol, and there are other battalions: aidar, c14, donbas, tornado, etc.

    Your 3 categories are particularly stupid, misrepresenting everything. And you are very poorly informed of the reality.

    You do not even know the fate of the captured azov nazis. LOL.

    It’s better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than open it and remove all doubt.

    ―马克吐温

    Same applies to Ritter.

    • 回复: @John Johnson
  487. @Moses22

    It is obvious that retards do not understand the Russian душа.

  488. @Commentator Mike

    Several foreign officers trapped in Azovstal have been killed by the azov nazis.

    The orders came from the foreign officers’ own governments.

    Reason: they did not want that they would be captured by the Russians and could reveal too much.

    The Russians do not reveal whom they captured among those foreign officers to keep those foreign governments in the blue.

    The higher commanders are still hiding inside the tunnels of Azovstal.

    In two days, 1750 people surrendered.

    Reminder: 6 foreign languages were spoken inside Azovstal.

  489. @frankie p

    我不太明白两个人如何互相殴打是一个话题。
    是不是有点让人想起古老的印第安人仪式
    “surrogate champion duel” (as laid out in the “Return of the Heraklids”
    即斯巴达的基础神话,可能还有大卫与歌利亚)?
    施梅林也可以杀了路易斯而不会脸红,
    但是乔被麻醉了,古德占了上风, 巴鲁克哈舍姆.

  490. @IreneAthena

    你写了:

    I’d love to hear …. Devil Advocate and Truth Vigilante discussing “what can be done to prepare.

    I’m not a prepper and don’t have a nuclear fallout shelter, a generator and hundreds of litres of petrol stored in case of a cataclysm.

    But, as I have said in many previous threads here in UR, in relation to the coming inflationary depression, you will need a store of precious metals in the years to come, as all the world’s currencies [and especially the USD], implode and massively lose purchasing power as the world reverts to a gold standard.

    Of course, the gold standards of the past were in fact a bimetallic standard, whereby gold AND silver were the monetary metals that were accepted as money throughout the world.

    As in the past, the usual naysayers were whining that you can’t eat gold.
    Indeed that’s true – no more than you can eat your VISA credit card or a $100 bill.

    Gold [and silver] has no pretence of being able to feed, clothe and provide shelter for you.

    It is a MEDIUM OF EXCHANGE that will be used to purchase all of the above.
    Again the doubters will counter with, if there’s a nuclear winter in the aftermath of WWIII, and 90% of humanity is dead or dying, gold won’t do you much good as people will go on a barter system and only trade one tangible resource for another.

    My Response: NO matter what proportion of the Earth’s population survives, other than for perhaps a short time and employed in isolated pockets, the remainder of civilisation will NEVER go back to barter on an ongoing basis.
    Something WILL be chosen to be the medium of exchange and 5000 years of UNINTERRUPTED history (other than for the experiment of the last 50 years), has ALWAYS said that would be gold and silver.

    Knowing this, the Chinese and Russians have been accumulating gold like there is no tomorrow, in preparation for the demise of the USD as world reserve currency.

    I’m in Australia but you don’t have to live here to purchase from the Perth Mint which assays the bulk of Australia’s gold and silver and can ship it around the world.

    If you prefer, you can get your 1 oz silver eagles and Maple leaf coins from the U.S and Canadian mints respectively.
    U.S dimes, quarters, half and dollar coins (pre-1965) are 90% silver.
    Canadian pre-1968 equivalents are 80% silver.

    For those that don’t have enough to buy too much gold (just under USD $60K per kg of Au), put aside some money for those silver coins.
    When the SHTF, you’ll be glad you did.

    Lastly, if you must hold any currencies, the least worst would be the likes of the Swiss franc (the Swiss central bank has the largest gold holding in the world relative to its population), or perhaps the likes of the Russian Ruble, Australian and Canadian dollars.

    The last three are resource rich countries and the world will need their output (iron ore, coal, gold, copper, nickel, oil and gas etc) so they’re nowhere near as likely to collapse like the USD seeing as these currencies will have a significant ‘backing’ from the commodities they export.

    The U.S certainly does have mining output of its own BUT, it is infinitesimal in comparison to the OBSCENE quantities of USD that have already been printed/digitally created, let alone the likely tsunami of USD that are still to be conjured up in the years to come.

    I hope that is of assistance IreneAthena. Get cracking kiddies and start accumulating those silver coins.

    • 同意: IreneAthena
    • 回复: @IreneAthena
  491. @Corvinus

    At the beginning of the special operation conscripts were sent to the front lines. When Putin learned about it, he forbade it. Period. Conscripts now care only about logistiks.

    You are a liar, member of the empire of lies like the corrupt merdias you are quoting.

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  492. j2 说:
    @peterAUS

    “Offensive vs defensive missions.”

    With no intention for starting neither a conversation nor a debate, I want to point out that the distinction between offensive vs defensive capabilities is correct in some type of warfare, mainly in symmetric situations. But it is not necessarily so in an asymmetric situation where:
    Side A has large but less trained light infantry with antitank and antiaircraft weapons capable of defense against B, and some small troops with capabilities of offence against B.
    Side B has a small force, but it is very mobile and has superior firepower.

    In this situation the infantry army A can make a counteroffence without practically ever going to attack. That is, B cannot hold many places or if it tries, it is too thin in most places. Thus, A can move to where B is not and if B wants to take this site, it has to attack, so A defends. If B does not move, it gets encirculated by a siege that only defends. B tries to control ground by taking roads and hubs (cities, villages). To take hubs it has to attack, so A defends. Roads are supposed to delineate the so called secured area, but it is not secured since the only effect controlling these roads is to stop supplies and movement of A. But to get supplies through, all A needs is to take a temporary control of a part of the road. That can be made with two ambushes. B has tanks and planes, but A has weapons against both. B has artillery, but poor situation awareness and does not know where to shoot. Unweeding digged in infantry is as hard as removing weed always is, but if infantry is not digged in, it is spread and difficult to locate. B has too few goals for its firepower. A makes a successful counteroffensive without practically ever attacking. Some places it must take by attack, but then it is not light infantry that does it.

    Already from Napoleon we know that a professional army loses to people’s army simply because the latter is larger. The former is better trained, but just because of that it gets weaker when trained men are eliminated. The latter is less trained and can replace with less trained.

    Already from the American Civil War and WWI we know that a Napoleonic infantry charge against firepower is a bad idea. Thus, infantry makes a counteroffensive without attacking. Even the USA loses this way, because a small and powerful professional army is only a tool for special military operations and colonial wars, not for real wars. If ground is not occupied by forces, it is finally occupied by the other side, thus a large infantry is needed.

    • 回复: @j2
  493. One testimony from Mariupol:

    The most terrifying was… when azov set on fire the basement of the house number 18 and were throwing grenades at people. We were hiding in the house next door, a private one and we could hear the screams and cries of people who were running from there. I was just horrible.
    – Did they explain why they were doing it?
    – People who were there – we had a friend there that’s how we know it was azov and that’s how we know many died… They just mined around, when retreating, nailed the basements shut so that people could not get out and in remaining openings they threw grenades – that’s what she said. And then, the men who were there started breaking the doors so they managed to save some but a lot of people died. People were screaming and we could hear it sitting in the basement next door but we couldn’t do anything because there was shelling. It’s just nightmare. If before this, you know, I had a moment when I still believed Ukrainian news, but aftere this I understood that this is such propaganda and lies.

    This is what is called effective and long resistance by some people here. Indeed.

  494. j2 说:
    @j2

    Napoleon is the one to learn about warfare, as Clausewitz, Hitler and Stalin did. Artillery is for destroying fighting order, not so much of killing men. The side that goes to attack in good formation is worse hit by artillery, so Russian attack preparations are vulnerable to precise artillery strikes. Spirit by ideology, religion, symbols is needed for a people’s army to do war anywhere but in primate instinctive protection of territory. Thus Z is wasted as the army is contract soldiers: they do not need Z or home front support, they need to stay alive to collect the wages. Peoples armies need a reason to die for and home front support. Another to learn from is Mao, not Sun Tzu: they fight their way, we fight our way, and war is not about winning battles – there need not be a center of gravity, it is all about controlling the country after the war. I think Russians have not carefully thought about philosophical concepts, but they are the foundation.

  495. @Disciple2

    由于美国MIC的大规模腐败,俄罗斯在军事装备方面超过了美国,占美国预算的10%。搬起石头砸自己的脚。美国战争机器的目的是谋杀农民和城市贫民窟居民,并摧毁较弱或手无寸铁的受害者。他们无法在自己的领土上与俄罗斯或中国作战,他们也知道这一点。

    • 同意: Olivier1973
  496. @Avery

    Putin, or whoever advises the Russian Government, outsmarted the EU femocrats with elan. ‘Meringue Head’ Ursula is a buffoon. Will sane, rational, empathic women (or men) ever enter Western ‘democratic’ politics?

  497. @Sendejo

    The problem with Ritter’s statement is that he mentions Jews, only, which, as we know, is de rigeur in the West. He neglects the tens of thousands of other victims, Roma, psychiatric patients, Soviet POWs, Russians, communists, even OUN members, slaughtered at Babi Yar. Murdered by the Nazis and their Ukrainian allies, the forefathers of the current Ukronazi regime.

  498. karel 说:
    @Corvinus

    “现实是乌克兰将要输……”
    也许。 再说一次,也许不是。

    也许,Elensky 很快就会学会如何用他的阴茎在钢琴上弹奏 Ще не вмерла Українa。

  499. karel 说:
    @IreneAthena

    购买必需品(例如,保质期长的食物、种子、坚固的园艺设备),并在您的现金失去更多价值之前尽快购买。

    你的伟大想法。 也许在塞瓦斯托波尔附近的某个地方买一栋别墅可能是一个适合播种的好主意。

    • 不同意: IreneAthena
  500. Anon[118]• 免责声明 说:

    Extra! Extra! Read all about it! JTRIG bot robing rushes to disclaim capture of US illegal combatant ADMIRAL OLSEN!

    https://halturnerradioshow.com/index.php/en/news-page/world/reports-u-s-admiral-surrenders-to-russia-in-mariupol-ukraine

    JTRIG bot robing knows perfectly well that illegal combatant Admiral Olsen, will, under the Geneva Conventions, lose his rights to communication and representation when he is hors de combat. This allows JTRIG bot robing to disclaim proof.

    JTRIG bot robing is very sensitive to impending trial of illegal combatant ADMIRAL OLSEN, because Olsen’s trial is formal proof that the USA lost this war.

  501. 没有什么神秘的,只是确认:

    1.斯科特·里特尽管有军事背景,但并不真正了解战争是如何运作的
    2. 有意或无意,有意或无意,出于只有他自己知道的原因(如果有人知道的话),事实证明他已经堕落到了普京托儿的水平,而这就是他在整个过程中大部分时间的处境

    不理解-1-,战争,而且对-2-,先令如此深入,他没有注意到他在吐出纯粹的废话,因为他实际上相信自己的废话,所以他给自己挖了一个深坑,现在他正在尝试让自己摆脱困境,而又不显得像一个不懂战争、为普京卖钱的人——事实证明,这很难做到。看起来很糟糕。有点乱。甚至丑陋。观看它,通常你会为这个人感到尴尬,但我一直为他感到尴尬。

    • 回复: @peterAUS
  502. @j2

    拿破仑是学习战争的人,克劳塞维茨、希特勒和斯大林就是这样做的。 大炮是用来破坏战斗秩序的,而不是用来杀人的。

    没那么多杀男人??????

    自拿破仑以来,炮兵在每场重大战争中杀死的人数最多。

    It doesn’t have the glamour of tanks or infantry battles but it kills the most soldiers.

    美国派出的m777的杀伤半径为75码。 对步兵极为致命。

    德国和美国的榴弹炮是世界上最好的。 乌克兰大约有100个。 俄罗斯正疯狂地试图用导弹和空袭摧毁它们。

    It is a myth that artillery doesn’t kill that many people and just sends everyone for cover.

    人民军队在任何地方进行战争都需要意识形态、宗教和象征的精神,但灵长类动物本能地保护领土。 因此,Z 被浪费了,因为军队是合同兵:他们不需要 Z 或后方的支持,他们需要活下去来领取工资。

    That is correct and why the Russian soldiers are demoralized. They don’t believe in this war.

    The German soldiers believed in Hitler and were willing to die for him. Even in Stalingrad they wrote letters home telling their wives to not mourn them because the Germans will win the war. That is pretty incredible. Putin doesn’t motivate the soldiers like Hitler, Alexander the Great or Napolean. They don’t believe in him or the cause.

    • 回复: @j2
    , @karel
  503. @Olivier1973

    You do not even understand that Russians are not in a hurry, time is on their side.

    Time is not on the side of the Russians.

    This is not 1980. Their heavy machinery and tech is dependent on the US and Germany.

    When the machines start breaking they won’t be able to order replacement parts.

    Putin planned on taking all of Ukraine through a decapitation strike and then negotiating away the sanctions. Well that didn’t work and he doesn’t have a backup plan.

    He also doesn’t understand his own economy. He said the Russians can basically learn to depend on themselves which shows that he doesn’t understand how much of the GDP depends on Western technology. You can’t just knock off 20% of the GDP and shrug. You get a spiral effect where people stop spending and areas of the economy that should in theory be unaffected start collapsing.

    • 巨魔: Notsofast
    • 回复: @Olivier1973
    , @Wokechoke
  504. j2 说:
    @John Johnson

    Yes, artillery is the main killer on the battle field, but you do not get what I mean. It is much more than a killer of men when correctly used. It can stop attacks before they start, and that is how it should be used against Russia because traditionally Russian does not care of how many men are killed, and will not care how many Chechens or Donbass separatists are killed. You cannot stop Russians with losses.

    Napoleon was the first one to effectively use artillery. The opponent could also use artillery, but against the enlightenment-inspired Frenchmen it did not matter how many were killed: they were to liberate the world, they had the spirit and little training. But for a professional army opposing Napolen, though they could take the loss of men, the effect was losing combat order and therefore not being able to attack effectively. This was so with Russians in WWII, it is still so, they amass for a battle, they do not swarm, artillery can stop them from starting an attack. Artillery fire must be precise and effective to do this. Think about this. To get an advantage you have to think what really gives the advantage and what gives the opponent its strength.

    • 回复: @John Johnson
  505. @Anonymous

    请忽略我之前对您的反应的回复。 我是在通勤火车上写的,当时我的手机因网络连接中断而死机。 当连接恢复时,未完成的文本似乎部分上传,以句子结尾。 这是完整的文本。

    是的,你完全正确,美国计划对中国采取的情景非常令人不安。 但是,想要它的人的思维方式与我们完全不同,甚至可能大脑的接线方式也完全不同。 有些角色决心推动真正的大项目,他们以冷酷无情、完全无视小细节和下属来完成这项工作而著称。 历史表明,至少有2000年就有这样的人物。 我们只是当今受苦受难的人。

    一些将军认为某些胜利值得成千上万士兵的牺牲。 Madeleine Albright 坚信,为了让一个国家屈服,成千上万儿童的饥饿是“值得的”。 一些对冲基金或风险投资经理不得不对破坏整个社区或摧毁企业感到不安,以便将他们的手套放在房地产上或获得最大的清算利润。 华尔街的某些类型不仅满足于扰乱市场和消灭竞争对手,而且他们甚至“想撕毁他们的心”(迪克·富尔德引述)。 这些角色对自己的利益有着共同的自大和军事关注,他们只考虑自己的同类。 商界领袖被视为“官员”(CEO、COO、CFO、CIO)或“行业领袖”并非巧合,孙子的《孙子兵法》是最受欢迎的励志书籍之一。小辈加入行列。

    Gonzalo Lira 可能没有太多的军事经验,但当他将具有这些特殊心态的角色确定为真正的罪魁祸首时,他出色的分析头脑是准确的。 我认为对里拉的观察是我在之前评论中链接的视频的完美背景:

    至于中国:制裁不会成为首选武器。 中国政府确实负债累累,但主要是对国内银行。 中国没有从其他国家借钱,很多其他国家欠中国的钱,尤其是美国。 此外,中国人在美国拥有大量基础设施和房地产。 美国和欧盟愚蠢地放弃了大部分经济自主权,将大部分制造能力外包,几乎没有其他选择。 中国拥有自己的来自非洲、南美和澳大利亚的原材料供应链。 更重要的是; 与俄罗斯和印度共同建立的 SWIFT 银行代码的替代方案即将完成。 中国人需要我们的知识和制造专业知识来复制和代表我们制造的时代已经一去不复返了。 中国的高科技和工程实力开始超越我们。 因此,中国人实际上控制了我们,并且是控制杆背后的人,以扣留我们的供应并破坏我们的经济。 制裁企图很可能会以痛苦的报复作为回应,这将比他们的经济更伤害我们的经济。

    攻击中国人可能会走上一条众所周知的老路。 首先会有抹黑和大量虚假信息。 声称中国经济将很快严重崩溃以及习近平的健康状况岌岌可危的说法,预示着一场卑鄙运动的开始。

    还会有很多破坏,就像我们看到的病毒杀死猪和家禽(中国日常食品供应的主要肉类供应商)以及针对中国人类基因组各个方面的病毒。 针对“一带一路”铁路、三峡大坝等基础设施、电网、高速铁路线以及中国散货和集装箱航运基础设施的破坏也是可能的。 会有很多假旗操作和代理争夺。 Gonzalo Lira 怀疑澳大利亚将像乌克兰一样被用于此目的,而且这种情况非常现实。

    就像俄罗斯人被乌克兰人对顿巴斯地区的猛烈炮击所激怒一样,中国人也会被在中国海、香港、蒙古、西藏、台湾和中国航线沿线的战略要地的阶段性事件激怒。 此外,美国可能会试图从中国剥离盟友,如印度、俄罗斯和几个南美关系,以破坏这种忠诚的联合力量。 美国将竭尽全力破坏参与者的关系,腐蚀他们的货币和经济。 中国产品将成为虚假安全、健康和安保问题的主题,与中国企业家的合作将被贴上可疑和危险的标签。 中国出口的客机、火车、卡车、发电和医疗设备、工业机械等高科技产品,可能暗中卷入或卷入事故、灾难和引人注目的事件中,以显示其“劣质”和“不适合使用” .

    出访的中国官员可能会成为陷阱的目标,以便将其与丑闻联系起来。 或者,中国高级官员可能会被邀请在世界组织中发挥领导和塑造作用,一旦关系建立,他们就会被用来发挥影响力,他们坚定地融入和承诺。 还将试图通过社交媒体削弱中国人,并在中国学生、导师和渗透到企业和国家组织的公关部门中引入和传播“清醒的想法”。 如果 Twitter 和 YouTube 可以(ab)用于美国,那么 WeTalk 和 TikTok 可以(ab)用于中国。 在高级政府职能中通常会插入植物以从内部影响思想; 在这种情况下,华裔官员由美国或英国字母汤实体购买和培训。

    仅仅因为这些原因,普京将所有与非政府组织和字母汤相关的个人赶出俄罗斯是正确的,但我们还没有看到中共采取这样的步骤。 邓小平专注于商业,用中国产品充斥整个西方的意图(这是他在 1978 年至 1989 年执政期间的主要目标)在中共的政治名单上仍然名列前茅,而以剥夺供应为武器的情景是尚未提及作为可能的武器。 但中国人正在密切关注俄罗斯在当前制裁下的表现,他们是快速灵活的学习者。 以中国为中心的欧亚权力集团肯定正在形成,美国转向中国是不可避免和不可或缺的。 它会变得讨厌。

    • 同意: Passing By, frankie p
    • 回复: @John Johnson
    , @frankie p
  506. @Truth Vigilante

    Thanks so much for those suggestions, Truth Vigilante!

    A lot of people get overwhelmed, believing that if they don’t have a fully-stocked bunker, they’re doomed, and there’s no use setting anything by if they don’t have the resources to hoard everything they’ll need to survive until [what age?]

    It’s important to start somewhere, say making preparations to survive 72 hours after store shelves are bare. After that goal is reached, work towards independence for increasingly longer periods of time.

    As to your belief that the survivors WILL organize into some semblance of civilization, where precious metals will be used for currency: agreed. This is a hope to hold on to, beyond the hope of mere survival.

    再次感谢。

  507. @j2

    traditionally Russian does not care of how many men are killed, and will not care how many Chechens or Donbass separatists are killed. You cannot stop Russians with losses.

    Yes traditionally Russia will throw waves of men to the front but Putin isn’t Stalin and doesn’t have some secret reserve of tanks.

    The Russians can’t send in men unprotected against modern weapons. Even if they ordered a million men to march West it wouldn’t work.

    Germany would have easily finished off the Russians in WW1 if they weren’t fighting two fronts. Russians are not invincible and would have lost WW2 as well if they fought Germany alone. They lost the Afghan war and that was before the US started sending stinger missiles.

    This was so with Russians in WWII, it is still so, they amass for a battle, they do not swarm, artillery can stop them from starting an attack.

    That is correct but it is extremely dangerous to fire these howitzers because of satellites and drones. Moscow still has long range missiles and limited air support. I honestly don’t think the howitzers will last very long so they have to be careful in how they use them. The sats detect when they fire and they send out attack helicopters.

    I think they are right to take out armor and supply lines. It demoralizes the infantry. All these tank shells start piling up and the frontline soldiers don’t feel so confident in what they are being told.

    • 回复: @j2
  508. @Gerhard57NL

    就像俄罗斯人被乌克兰人对顿巴斯地区的猛烈炮击所激怒一样

    密集炮击? 一定要告诉那是什么时候发生的。 准确地给出日期以及被杀的人数。

    正是出于这些原因,普京将所有与非政府组织和字母汤相关的个人赶出俄罗斯是正确的

    Putin is an arrogant prick that doesn’t understand economics. He is like Hitler 1940 and thinks he knows better than any of his advisors.

    He has kicked out tech experts and they can’t be replaced by watching youtube videos with Russian subtitles.

    The fact that he is trying to play a currency game shows that he is in over his head. You can’t kick out the experts and then try to prop up the economy by manipulating the currency. That is something a clueless African dictator would do. If your economy has fundamental problems you can’t hide that through lame schemes like trying to force your enemies to trade in your currency.

    • 回复: @geokat62
    , @Turk 152
  509. geokat62 说:
    @John Johnson

    Intense shelling? Do tell when that happened.

    Ukraine: Heading East. Donbass Residents Taking Refuge in Russia (After 8 Years of Suffering & Death) I RT Documentary

    https://rumble.com/v12ajl4-ukraine-heading-east.-donbass-residents-taking-refuge-in-russia-rt-document.html

    描述:

    There are 2.5 million refugees from Donbass in Russia. Although they left their destroyed homes, volunteers try to give them a chance for a new life.

    For the past 8 years, Donbass has been a war zone. Government troops began shelling due to views on the Russian language, history, and the country’s future, which did not coincide with the official Ukrainian position.

    At the end of February 2022, Russian troops and volunteers helped refugees from Donbass move to a safe place. Watch about it in the film Ukraine: Heading East.

    Give the date exactly and how many were killed.

    April 2014. According to UN estimates, over 13,000 people (including children and elderly civilians), have been killed in the conflict.

    https://www.rt.com/russia/549468-putin-donbass-genocide-claim/

    • 谢谢: Gerhard57NL
    • 回复: @John Johnson
  510. anon[154]• 免责声明 说:

    My new favorite thing is John’s Johnson dicksplaining to us why Russia is losing as Hoholes surrender in divisions

    https://yt3.ggpht.com/yowKq-gNKmZKOsqtpC5F2iWjjXnSmvK-Gat34ep6-e1HJRhXnZcT1mcW7KWLx8sUQ9hG1T09W_29=s800-v1-nd

    • 回复: @geokat62
  511. j2 说:
    @John Johnson

    “That is correct but it is extremely dangerous to fire these howitzers because of satellites and drones. Moscow still has long range missiles and limited air support. ”

    Russian stock pile of medium range missiles was expected to be about 2000 by Western estimations. They have shot a bit over 2000 in Ukraine. They should have short supplies rather soon. With the howizers, they should move after firing. It is easier with self-propelled howizers. I wonder when the training time for those from the Dutch and Germans is over. As for drones, Ukraine does manage to take out artillery drones rather well with MANPADs, and attack helicopters also. But yes, both sides have anti-artillery radars, so staying in a place a howizer will not last long. Should have many batteries shooting to the same place at the same time and then all moving.

    About this war, there seems to be two opinions of the situation. NATO thinks nothing will happen in the next weeks, some other people think that Russian next attack will start in early June, after 24. May anyway, but quite soon. Some think Ukraine now has the window for a counteroffensive and should use it. And some debate if Ukraine can regain the lost areas or not. I have my view and it is a counteroffensive soon, but mainly not by attacks. Ukraine has to use imagination to do it.

  512. peterAUS 说:
    @SimplePseudonymicHandle

    是的。

    You’ll, probably, find this as O.K. read:
    https://anti-empire.com/scott-ritter-catches-up-to-anti-empire/

    The guy is a bit hard on the Lt.Col (ret), but, he’s been pretty much correct about the war so far.

    …..former Marine and presently a clown…

    ….an “intelligence officer” (desk jockey) ….

    ….he was still dispensing triumphalist garbage…..

    ….Ritter is only now waking up to the reality….

    …soothing garbage….

  513. karel 说:
    @John Johnson

    德国和美国的榴弹炮是世界上最好的。 乌克兰大约有100个。

    现在榴弹炮的数量不是更少了吗?

  514. 因此,普京不知道兰德公司计划在与美国的代理人战争中在乌克兰粉碎俄罗斯,在这种情况下,他的情报部门背叛了他。

  515. @jimbojones

    俄罗斯拥有非常大的炸弹,可以在一两天内摧毁顿巴斯的所有此类防御工事,但俄罗斯没有使用它们。 为什么?

    一旦俄罗斯人使用这种炸弹,乌克兰人很快就会大批投降。

    也可在乌克兰机场使用它们

    增能航空温压炸弹(ATBIP;俄语:Авиационная вакуумная бомба повышенной мощности, АВБПМ),[1] 绰号“炸弹之父”(FOAB;俄语:“Папа всех бомб”,Пвв),[2 ] 是俄罗斯人-设计、轰炸机投送的温压武器。

    据报道,该炸弹类似于美军的GBU-43/B大规模空爆炸弹,后者通常被非正式地称为“炸弹之母”,源自其官方军事缩写“MOAB”。 因此,这种武器将是世界上最强大的常规(非核武器)武器。 [3] 然而,俄罗斯有关该武器尺寸和威力的说法的真实性受到了美国国防分析人士的质疑。 [4]

    “FOAB”于11年2007月5日晚成功进行了现场测试。[6] 这种新武器将取代俄罗斯武库中的几种较小型核弹。[XNUMX]

    该温压装置使用约 44 吨新型烈性炸药可产生相当于 7 吨 TNT 的量。 [8] 正因为如此,炸弹的爆炸和压力波具有与小型战术核武器类似的效果。 [6] 炸弹的工作原理是在半空中引爆。 大多数损坏是由超音速冲击波和极高温度造成的。[9][3] 温压武器与传统爆炸性武器的不同之处在于,它们会产生更长、更持续的冲击波和更高的温度。 这样做时,它们比类似质量的常规武器在更大的区域内产生更多的伤害。 [XNUMX]

  516. Dnought 说:
    @j2

    Artillery was responsible for 58% of all casualties in World War One. In World War two the overall percentage was even higher; in open terrain outside of cities it was responsible for nearly 75% of all casualties. Modern artillery is even more lethal.

    Artillery is plenty good “for killing men”.

    • 同意: peterAUS
    • 回复: @j2
  517. Turk 152 说:
    @John Johnson

    You are probably being fed information from the US military intelligence, as the people who I have encountered in those circles have similar views about Crazy Putin moments away from a coup; Putin is stepping into the Cat’s Paw in Kiev, Russian tanks are coffins on wheels, the destruction of Russian economy due to sanctions, yada, yada, yada.

    As a non-military person, it seems you are living in an echo chamber with loads of confirmation bias. Ruppel for Gas and the boomerang effect on inflation was unexpectedly brilliant and impactful; not to give credit, where credit is due, because you are so far out on a position, wont help your analysis.

  518. Anon7 说:
    @j2

    Here’s a Russian video showing the million-dollar American howitzers being towed by trucks in Ukraine, and then being towed into the woods to hide, and then being destroyed.

    https://tass.ru/armiya-i-opk/14657745

    • 回复: @j2
  519. Loup-Bouc 说:

    斯科特·里特(Scott Ritter)犯了一个严重的错误。 事实上,他所有新分析的前提和推论都是错误的。

    看这个反驳: https://sonar21.com/scott-ritters-unforced-error/

    另请参阅此处发布的所有其他俄罗斯/乌克兰冲突文章: https://sonar21.com

    • 回复: @Hartmann
  520. anon[299]• 免责声明 说:

    John’s Johnson could maybe get a job instead of yammering evident bullshit here 18 hours a day:

    https://www.armytimes.com/news/your-army/2022/05/17/foreboding-army-psyops-recruitment-video-shows-whos-pulling-the-strings/

    He certainly has the endurance to cheer on pathetic losers as they get crushed!

    • 回复: @John Johnson
  521. @acementhead

    I was wrong, was just going from memory. It’s even worse Ardern’s ‘degree’ is a ‘studies’ degree. Bachelor of Communications Studies.

  522. @geokat62

    So you don’t have a date for the mass shelling incident that you made up.

    I knew you made it up because if Ukraine wanted to mass shell Donbass then it wouldn’t exist. It would like what the Russians did to Mariupol.

    Donbass fighting started with separatists wanting to split the land from Ukraine. They blew up a passenger jet, remember?

    What did you expect Ukraine to do? Shrug? What if New Mexico wanted to join Mexico and started a violent insurrection? You would be fine with it?

    • 回复: @geokat62
  523. @anon

    Speaking of recruitment:
    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2022/05/14/russian-military-recruitment-centres-hit-spate-arson-attacks/

    Nothing says high morale like burning down recruitment centers.

    As for employment I mastered my profession years ago. I can pretty much work when I please.

    Too bad that I ruin your pathetic little Putin cheerleader party. Cry more. Scott changed his mind so are you still certain that I am the one that is out of touch with reality?

    Then I get called a Jew for not wanting a pointless war between two White countries. Yes because that is what Jews say all time. Oy vey not Whites on Whites!

    Your little boots dictator won’t make it to September. The FSB will give him the Alex II treatment for his arrogance. No more trips to Israel for him. L’cchhhChaim.

  524. frankie p 说:
    @Gerhard57NL

    很好地分析了当前与中国的局势,非常准确地预测了美国为削弱日益增长的东亚霸权而进行的邪恶活动。

    我要补充的一件事:

    “中国政府确实负债累累,但主要是欠国内银行。 中国没有从其他国家借钱,很多其他国家欠中国的钱,尤其是美国。 此外,中国人在美国拥有大量基础设施和房地产。 ”

    他们不仅在美国拥有大量基础设施和房地产,如果事情变得非常不友好,他们将拥有许多位于中国的西方制造业基础设施、工厂和工厂。 你能想象美国试图像他们在俄罗斯对抗中国那样进行流动性攫取吗? 中国可以将位于中国的价值数万亿美元的西方工厂和企业国有化。

    以牙还牙是个婊子。

    • 谢谢: Gerhard57NL
  525. geokat62 说:
    @John Johnson

    So you don’t have a date for the mass shelling incident that you made up.

    Since it’s not an “incident” but a prolonged activity, I noted the start date (April 2014).

    What did you expect Ukraine to do? Shrug? What if New Mexico wanted to join Mexico and started a violent insurrection? You would be fine with it?

    If you poke a bear in the eye, expect a response.

    Kolomoisky is the kingpin moving the pawns on the chessboard in Ukraine, aka Second Israel. He groomed Zelensky in his presidential role and financed his campaign. He also financed the Azoz Regiment and promoted their ideology of ethno-nationalism, which is anathema in the rest of the West. He did so for one simple reason… to use these people as cannon fodder in a conflict against another group of white Christians. I oppose brothers’ wars, so I wish to see this conflict come to a quick conclusion, as there are no winners, except for the group who pushed for this conflict in the first place.

    • 同意: Passing By
    • 回复: @John Johnson
  526. anon[344]• 免责声明 说:

    John’s Johnson 536, thanks for the precious moment of hearing you assure disembodied internet voices that you’re not a lonely obsessive loser but a man of leisure with redoubtable expertise in losing wars comically fast.

    Been perusing your Linked-in, it’s very interesting! After leading Gadafy to triumph in the Toyota War, Keyboard Commando Johnson earned the esteem of geostrategists worldwide with critical armchair advice to Operation Gothic Serpent. He personally took Vicarious Command of Operation Piss My Pants in Maroun al-Ras from his command post at a dispiriting corporate coffee ship. Currently from his basement eagle’s nest he commands an elite squadron of elderly bus drivers marching with brooms in the basement of Holodomorskaya Nursery School.

  527. peterAUS 说:

    Written by an ex-GRU fellow , on 02/03/2022:

    https://nvo.ng.ru/realty/2022-02-03/3_1175_donbass.html

    Well…if people like him were to replace the kleptocracy in Kremlin, maybe this shitshow could result in some good.

    • 回复: @j2
  528. Anonymous[221]• 免责声明 说:
    @Greg S.

    Some excellent points in your posts, Greg S., such as below (and I hope you’re right).

    “What benefits Russia more: having corrupt clowns in charge of Western nations (Biden, Trudeau, Johnson, Macron – all total frauds and sell-outs), or having smart, strong, nationalist leaders in the West? I don’t think Russia is scared at all of that cadre of clowns, because Russia knows they are all sociopaths who only really care about themselves. That type of leader won’t enter a nuclear war or do anything that seriously risks the only thing they really care about: themselves.”

  529. Anonymous[221]• 免责声明 说:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    So true, Mulga: “Liberal fascist feminazis … are, inevitably, DISASTROUS in power.”

    And here in Canada our government even has, at the top, a Ukranazi in our (real) prime minister, Chrystia Freeland, and probably a trainee nazi in our young Minister of Foreign Affairs, Melanie Joly, who a couple of months ago stated that her objective was to end Mr. Putin’s “regime”.

    BTW, your comments are always beautifully written, and bang-on.

  530. Anon[240]• 免责声明 说:
    @you

    Funny, all these armchair generals (eg Ritter) think Putin’s losing and slowing, yet Putin never gave a timetable. Only a fool would. To correct Ritter, the “new” weapons are obsolete junk, eg the M777 howitzers lack targeting packs, are only “towed” – and are being destroyed daily, Javelins and NLAWs are faulty or ineffective, Stingers are 40 yr-old tech.
    Get it? US/NATO knows Ze can’t win, so they feed him junk and pass a $40 billion budget for more US equipment that Ze will never see, except for the bill.
    Putin’s slow, methodical progress frustrates the video game generals and Putin’s surely sad to disappoint them, but he has a country to *保存* as intact as possible while sparing his “brothers” any more suffering. That’s why it’s *不是* a “war” but a “special military operation”.
    得到它? 我看到的只有一个人:安德烈·马尔蒂亚诺夫,一位真正的受过俄罗斯训练的士兵。 抬头看他。

  531. j2 说:
    @Anon7

    “Here’s a Russian video showing the million-dollar American howitzers being towed by trucks in Ukraine, and then being towed into the woods to hide, and then being destroyed.”

    Yes, and so are also Russian howizers being destroyed by Ukrainians. War is great destruction.

    But Ukraine does not yet use the weapons in an optimal way. Ukraine now wants from Western countries not to send howizers only but a whole set for a battery: antiartillery radars and antiaircraft systems for protection of the battery, drones for targeting and so on. A howizer must move swiftly in order to avoid being destroyed, and in order to use artillery effectively, one needs more batteries and ability to direct their fire to one place in the same time and then have all move before they are destroyed. Self-propelled artillery has better mobility than the towed ones, so M777 may be the best towed howizer, but it is not the best howizer.

    A battery can be destroyed by many weapons. 1) precision bombs from high altitude airplanes, Russia does not have them for this war. 2) artillery, but it has to be in the range and the range of M777 is a bit longer than Russian artillery, and artillery shoots to a coordinate place, so if the target moves fast and far enough, it does not hit, and if Russians do not have good enough targeting because drones are shot down, this may not be effective enough to destroy all. 3) helicopters or fighter planes on low altitude, for this threat one can use MANPADs. One has to go through all these methods (and maybe some other) and find protection against them.

    Of course the opponent will manage destroy some batteries despite protective methods, but will it destroy enough is the question. In any way, I am not in favor of fixed lines and protecting them with artillery. War must be mobile as mobility makes many of these ways of destroying artillery more difficult. Russians destroying some American howizers impresses me much less than the apparent Russian difficulty of advancing in their Donbass offensive. It looks very slow, almost stalled. Was that they way Putin planned it from the very beginning? Some very smart plan that no Western analyst can figure out. Like that Putin in reality wanted to kill Russian speaking Ukrainians because they have a slight foreign accent?

  532. j2 说:
    @Dnought

    “Artillery was responsible for 58% of all casualties in World War One. In World War two the overall percentage was even higher; in open terrain outside of cities it was responsible for nearly 75% of all casualties. Modern artillery is even more lethal.

    Artillery is plenty good “for killing men”.”

    Yes, of course. Artillery is the main killer on the battlefield, but does killing men stop Russians? Traditionalists often say that 1/3 losses mean mission failure and one should stop. Russia has now 1/3 losses from the initial power and is not stopping. Finally they may run out of men (and maybe medium range missiles) but they can find mercenaries even after that. They will not run out of weapons, though they do not want to use more than some percentage in this war. But it is a question whether Russia ever stops to running out of anything. They stop if they can claim to have accomplished the mission, even though what they achieved was not the mission. And finally they stop when there is no sense to continue, no success in sight. This is not done by killing men. It is done by killing the operation, the operation cannot have a chance of success. This is what you can use artillery for: no advance chances. It is not so easy to do this, Ukrainians have to use imagination, but there are goals of the war, conditions when the enemy gives up, strengths that give you advance, issues that give the opponent its advance, and so on. War is not weapons and battles, it is concepts and ideas. The question to you: what stops Russians and can you do it with artillery. Do not tell me that artillery is plenty good for killing men, as who cares of killing men. Or is your answer: killing men stops the war, so artillery is the tool. This is false if it is Russians, maybe true if it is Americans.

  533. @j2

    It seems they are learning quickly; in Kherson they are already
    “consolidating their victory” (in case they are feisty enough to still use the term),
    给予 assurances they will not leave. Remember, these are
    they are “occupying”, and the next referendum is already in the works.
    Kharkow isn´t going anywhere (I doubt even the Yids will start large-scale
    ethnic cleansing at this moment) – 敖德萨 is important now.

  534. Passing By 说:
    @acementhead

    The thing is, does anyone really believe that given their intellectual (dis)ability, their experience and their level of education, that they are the ones calling the shots in their respective countries?

  535. @Gerhard57NL

    China has forty-seven TRILLION in private savings. Let’s see the Yankees steal that!

    • 回复: @geokat62
    , @Truth Vigilante
  536. Corvinus 说:
    @Olivier1973

    “At the beginning of the special operation conscripts were sent to the front lines.”

    Which shows that Russia committed crimes against humanity, as offered by Mulegino1.

    “When Putin learned about it, he forbade it. Period. Conscripts now care only about logistiks.”

    You’re going to have offer sources here to back up your claim.

    “You are a liar, member of the empire of lies like the corrupt merdias you are quoting.”

    How can I be a liar when you agreed with me?

  537. Corvinus 说:
    @DevilAdvocate

    你是个伪君子,简单明了。

  538. geokat62 说:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    Let’s see the Yankees steal that!

    Yankees? You should be concerned about the ownership of China’s central bank.

  539. @John Johnson

    ROTFL!

    Ooooooooooooh, I see, you are in the head of Putin! Congratulations!

    Putin planned to denazification and demilitarisation of Ukraine. It is on its way.

    Russian troops: 12% that is some 100,000 men.
    Russian aviation: 10%
    Tanks: 5%
    Artillery: 4%

    Total control of the sky. See Snake Island.

    And winning. Slowly because the nazis are using civilians as human shields.

    Russian economy is fine compared to western economy. Russia has the ressources, western Europe and even the yankees do not have what they need. Hence stooping in front of Venezuela.

    Sanctions? Which sanctions? You do not read the news?

    Rendez-vous next year! When more of your nazi friends will be denazified, like the ones from Marioupol.

    • 回复: @John Johnson
  540. Anonymous[277]• 免责声明 说:
    @anon

    where do you get the impression of China/Russia making such a deal with Japan,

    The impression, which is obvious once stated, comes from the fact that China has very very seldom been an oceanic power (the exception being the Treasure Fleet era, less than a decade).

    China is a regional continental power. China quite rightly thinks that it will have enough trouble dealing with Northern and Southern Barbarians plus its own population without going to other continents to find new barbarians to fight. Beyond that, to be effective globally China would have to somehow subdue the governments of the First Island Chain, lest they ally with a real sea power and block the Chinese Navy from blue water access. That level of effort, to look for fights China does not want or need, and at the expense of reverses domestically and on China’s borders, is not likely to be exerted.

    So, what’s an obvious solution? Well, one of them is to have Japan switch from semi-tolerated status as an auxiliary to AUKUS back to a fully fledged Oceanic power in opposition to AUKUS. The First Island Chain could be made to work as a barrier to keep out the barbarians. Let the Japanese conquer the First Island Chain, exploit it, and keep AUKUS away from the Chinese coast. With any luck, the Japanese will remember the meat grinder that occupying China became for the WW II Japanese Army and stay the Hell off the Asian mainland. Add in depth missile defense to reinforce historical memory, and you might have a workable security policy.

    Possible? Well, apparently the Japanese upper classes are still a bit upset over WW II. You can see why — the classic example is that the Japanese saw the rest of the world playing Imperial chess, but were themselves penalized for doing so and forced to play parchisi while the US became World Emperor.

    I, myself, see the strategy of resurrecting the Japanese Empire as too risky (for both China and Japan) and technically difficult to be feasible, but, oh, that end state would look good to China. Stranger things have happened, such as UK support for Poland in the run up to WW II.

  541. @mulga mumblebrain

    47 trillion in SAVINGS ? Is that expressed in USD or CNY ?

    Are you sure you aren’t confusing this with their NET WORTH (ie: the combined value of total assets like residential and commercial real estate, stock and bond holdings, overseas investments, stockpiled central bank and privately held gold bullion AND liquid savings) ?

    • 回复: @mulga mumblebrain
  542. j2 说:
    @peterAUS

    “Written by an ex-GRU fellow , on 02/03/2022”

    I read the article. As from an ex-GRU, it implies that Russian military intelligence knew that there were no conditions (popular support even in Eastern Russia, capability for destroying Ukrainian defense to a required extent) for a strategic strike to succeed. Then Putin did not get false intelligence, yet proceeded with the strategic strike. That is interesting. Yet, this intelligence expert still clearly underestimates Ukrainian defense forces capability to fight outside cities. Russians trying to encirculate Kiev were stopped in at most suburban territory that does not give equal strength multiplier for a defender that what a city does. I bet he would have agreed with the American retired four star general Barry McCaffrey, who predicted that Russia takes Ukraine in 90 days. Now it is day 85. Russians overestimate their combat power and do not see the weaknesses of the BTG concept. They underestimate the enemy even when writing a warning of it.

  543. @peterAUS

    Your comments are very general, emotive, and without support of seemingly of little objectivity. If you have specialized knowledge beyond just saying so, then expound.

    Putintards??? Don’t reply to me again.

  544. @geokat62

    The kingpin is Putin.

    He started this war and can end it with a single command.

    Russia is the world’s largest country and has negative population growth

    They don’t need any more territory. Anyone in Donbass that wants to be Russian can move.

    • 回复: @geokat62
  545. The fighting capability of the Azov Battalion has been greatly overestimated and they do not deserve to be called an “elite” force by any means. What did they achieve other than murdering and torturing some civilians? They raised a stink and drew the attention of the world by hiding like rats in some underground bunkers and tunnels and releasing communiqués aggrandising themselves and begging for help. They didn’t even resist much when it came to it. Total wasters and losers – Hollywood Nazis.

    Presumably this is the last we’ll hear of them and the reconstituted Ukrainian military will no longer tolerate their presence since it proved to be such an embarrassment. Or …

    • 同意: Passing By
    • 回复: @Passing By
  546. @Olivier1973

    Putin planned to denazification and demilitarisation of Ukraine. It is on its way.

    That must be why the Ukrainians pushed them from the outskirts of Kiev all the way back to the border near Kherson.

    All going as planned I’m sure.

    Make it look like you wanted to take Kiev and then flee back to the border. I’m sure it is all a grand strategy.

    Russian economy is fine compared to western economy. Russia has the ressources, western Europe and even the yankees do not have what they need. Hence stooping in front of Venezuela.

    Russian inflation is at 18% and we aren’t halfway through the year:
    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-05-13/russian-inflation-spikes-to-20-year-record-on-war-and-sanctions

    Once their German and US machines start breaking down it will get even worse. You and Putin imagine the Russian economy as if it were 1985. You don’t understand how dependent they are on Western tech. Go research their top imports for yourself.

    Oil sales won’t be able to save them. If you can’t call German/US companies for parts and support it doesn’t matter how much cash you made from selling oil to China and Israel.

    Their economy is going to tailspin. Once the people stop believing in the war and Putin they will stop spending and that is when the depression will come. Hopefully the FSB will take out Putin before then.

    • 巨魔: Iris
  547. Passing By 说:
    @Commentator Mike

    As if their only purpose was to goad Russia into intervening.

  548. geokat62 说:
    @John Johnson

    [Putin] started this war and can end it with a single command.

    Says the concerned individual who supposedly “opposes” shelling in residential areas.

    How many Ukrainian civilians did Putin shell between April 2014 and February 2022?

    How many did Poroshenko/Zelensky?

    • 回复: @John Johnson
  549. Iris 说:

    Machine translation from a Russian website,

    Israeli television broadcast a report on a group of fighters from various special units of the Israeli army, who arrived in Ukraine to fight against the Russian army.

    One week after the Russian government announced the presence of Israeli special forces elements fighting alongside the Ukrainian army, a documentary featured a special unit led by Israelis from combat units, who were not only fighting alongside the Ukrainian army, but also training its forces and leadership to fight against the Russian army.

    The video was broadcast on Israeli television on may 12th and has been heavily posted on social media over the past two days.

    During exercises in Ukraine, the fighters are shown speaking in Hebrew about preparations for a forthcoming Israeli army offensive against Russian forces in combat zones.

    During the report, Israeli militants speak in a threatening tone to Russian forces operating in Ukraine.

    Vitaly Barbash Oleksandrovitch, a Ukrainian Jew who fought at the Azovstal factory in Mariupol, called on Israel to help them, the report said.

    https://t.me/dailyreportarabic/715

    The deluded Zionist Reich is taking on an adversary it cannot overcome in a thousand years. This is the beginning of the end for the apartheid, racist, supremacist, illegal Rotschild trading post north of Gaza.

  550. map 说:
    @Corvinus

    符合此描述的人口百分比是多少? 就数字而言,球场数字是多少? 你怎么知道的? 消息来源将有助于支持您的案例。

    什么情况? 我并不是说乌克兰到处都是纳粹分子。 这是 Scott Ritter 的立场,这是一个愚蠢的立场。

    此外,你的意识形态不是建立在亲白人、反移民、反犹太人和反女权主义的纳粹主义信条上吗?

    纳粹主义是一种狭隘的德国民族主义运动。 这与乌克兰无关。

    那么,如果普京如此关心乌克兰纳粹主义,为什么几年前他不做出这种努力呢? 过去十年中是否有任何文件或演讲表明他对这种据称渗透和统治乌克兰的哲学的关注?

    同样,我并不是说乌克兰到处都是纳粹分子。 我的观点是斯科特·里特(Scott Ritter)关于乌克兰纳粹的起始前提,那段历史以及俄罗斯入侵的原因都是虚假的。 Ritter 的评估是不可靠的,他可能是个惊吓。

    也许。 再说一次,也许不是。 此外,您有多大把握普京的继任者将在未来几十年继续致力于控制其统治下的乌克兰地区? 为什么?

    俄罗斯认为,乌克兰已成为中央情报局的黑点,利用秘密和公开行动破坏俄罗斯的稳定、安全和繁荣。 橙色革命、生物实验室以及对乌克兰俄罗斯分离地区的炮击都表明情况确实如此。

    现在,我不知道俄罗斯的立场是否属实。 然而,这是他们的叙述。 唯一的问题是这种说法有多持久,以及俄罗斯是否有意愿和手段对其采取行动,似乎确实如此。

    将乌克兰称为“纳粹”的攻击都是对合法的乌克兰民族主义的反击,而不是目前存在的安排。 亚速等人,简直就是寡头收买的佣兵。 他们和乔治·索罗斯一样“纳粹”。

    • 回复: @mulga mumblebrain
    , @Herald
  551. Spanky 说:
    @Jefferson Temple

    Yes, this reply is a day late and, probably, a dollar short…

    …hope that the Russian commanders can devise an effective strategy to win swiftly. — Jefferson Temple (as well as the sentiment of many others)

    明确的假设是长期战斗有利于美国/北约/乌克兰(乌克罗, for short) and a short one favors Russia. This assumption appears rooted in Ukro’s confidently asserted 流血俄罗斯煽动政权更迭 战略。 Ukro宣传也 信心十足地 stated during the first week of the conflict that Russia had few precision guided munitions and would run out of cruise missiles in a few days…

    但是,如果俄罗斯的计算与西方分析家的计算有些不同呢? 如果俄罗斯认为从军事以及经济和政治角度来看更长时间的战斗是有益的怎么办? 如果俄罗斯想扩大这场战斗以在经济和政治上让乌克兰人流血,并评估他们的军事战术和先进武器的有效性怎么办?

    The blowback created in the west by its sanctions against Russia will not reach full force until fall and winter. Until then, food and energy shortages are mostly an abstraction. Ending the war now, and attempting to resume and normalize trade relations, undercuts Russia’s apparent economic strategy and, thereby, its political strategy 面对面的人 个别欧洲国家(在欧盟内部以及与美国之间造成政治紧张和动荡)。

    Inflation is only just now beginning to bite — end the war now and Russia loses its most potent weapons — cold and hunger.

    In military terms, Russia continues making progress in the Donbass, destroying the most highly trained units of the Ukro army. Ukraine is being forced to conscript young and old to refill its ranks, train them rapidly (i.e. poorly) and immediately send them to the front(s). Simultaneously, after dumping their stockpiles of old and obsolescent weapons in Ukraine, the U.S. and (some) NATO nations are beginning to supply modern heavy weapons. If current Russian causalities are a fraction of Ukraine’s, as some independent studies suggest, this presents Russia with a technical / military intelligence opportunity — inexperienced and poorly trained troops operating advanced NATO weapons systems.

    It’s reasonable to think, considering their experience and observations in Syria, that Russia understood, before launching its Special Military Operation (SMO), how Ukro forces would be employed against their troops. Altho there is a concerted and widespread propaganda operation by Ukro to portray Putin as “疯狂的” and Russian political and military leadership as inept, it would be a mistake to buy into that point of view. The Russians are not all-knowing nor infallible, but neither are they crazy nor ignorant — it is a mistake to accept at face value Ukro propaganda portraying them as such.

    值得记住的是,Ukro 的宣传正试图将他们在 Azovstal 的部队投降给俄罗斯人作为 任务完成疏散.

    I cannot say what, exactly, Russia’s overall political/economic/military strategy is in Ukraine, but it’s clear it encompasses far more than just that immediate battlefield.

  552. Turk 152 说:

    Scott was just interviewed on Richard Medhurst, he seems to know what he is talking about: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HOzs_cCHVeU. But, perhaps all the armchair warriors know more.

  553. @Spanky

    在军事方面,俄罗斯继续在顿巴斯取得进展,摧毁了乌克兰军队中训练有素的部队。

    另一个人的报告 切换器:
    一位据称参与发动战争的俄罗斯高级分析家昨天承认了许多人不愿承认的事实。

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10836379/Ukraine-war-Ex-Russian-commander-says-meaningless-hope-victory-Donbas.html

    每日邮件 - 可能是20,2022

    ‘It’s meaningless to hope for victory’: Top Russian ex-spy turned influencer warns Putin’s offensive in Eastern Ukraine is going ‘very bad’, troops will suffer ‘huge losses’ while their leadership leaves ‘much to be desired’

    • Igor Girkin, an ex-FSB officer who led fighting in Donbas in 2014, has slammed Russia’s current war in Ukraine
    ...
    一位曾在最初的冲突中发挥重要作用的前间谍和指挥官表示,即使俄罗斯在未来几周内成功占领了整个顿巴斯,俄罗斯也几乎没有希望赢得在乌克兰的战争。

    这张图片显示了俄罗斯的表现有多么糟糕。 单击图标或图像以获取增强的详细信息。

    鸟瞰图显示了大约 XNUMX 辆被烧毁的军用车辆

    • 同意: peterAUS
  554. @geokat62

    Says the concerned individual who supposedly “opposes” shelling in residential areas.

    How many Ukrainian civilians did Putin shell between April 2014 and February 2022?

    How many did Poroshenko/Zelensky?

    Yes I oppose all residential shelling and I do not see why you quoted the word.

    The vast majority of Donbass fighting has been at street level between militias and separatists/Russian soldiers out of uniform. That is why I knew you made up some shelling event by the Ukraine government. Very little shelling outside of small mortars from both sides.

    It is Putin that reduced Mariupol to rubble by bombing residential areas.

    He has since move on to shelling residential areas of Donbass.

    This is how the Russians do it. Reduce the area to rubble and then send in troops. That is what they did in Serbia.

    Keep defending your little boots dictator. Another report came out today that he is seriously sick and mass defections are planned for May 26. You are defending a little loser that is trying to take a piece of Ukraine for the empire before he dies. Technically he is the world’s richest person and yet bombed a maternity ward. Total loser that lied about being a KGB agent. He was just an average mid level office worker for the KGB and his former bosses had little to say about him. When the USSR collapsed he started burning papers even though his bosses said there is nothing important that you are working on. His KGB mythos is all a lie.

    • 回复: @Iris
    , @Avery
    , @peterAUS
  555. @Been_there_done_that

    That’s just a strategic build up of abandoned vehicles.

    计划的所有部分。

  556. Iris 说:
    @Been_there_done_that

    It is really important to listen to opposite opinions to have a grasp about the volatile, fast-moving Ukraine situation.

    But quoting Zionist Nr1 mouthpiece the “每日邮件” as a credible source on the subject of anything Russia is like quoting Hillary Clinton’s judgments or claims on Donald Trump.

    There’s propaganda, and then there’s utter, happy simpletonism, to which your comment belongs.

    • 回复: @Been_there_done_that
  557. Spanky 说:
    @Been_there_done_that

    好吧,如果 每日邮件 is reporting it, how could it 不能 be true? /s

    Is Strelkov/Girkin acting as a top military analyst or 社交媒体影响者? Note that Scott Ritter recently changed his tune as well… just as the Azovstal surrender began. And that the U.S. government is known to have paid 社交媒体影响者 for favorable opinions.

    Moreover, it’s interesting that U.S. Defense Secretary Austin recently called Russian Defense Minister Shoygu and asked for an immediate ceasefire in Ukraine. If Ukraine is kicking Russian ass, why would Austin be Shoygu to declare a ceasefire?

    https://www.defense.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/3030753/readout-of-secretary-of-defense-lloyd-j-austin-iiis-call-with-russian-minister/

    You have your opinion, and I a different one. Time will tell.

  558. Iris 说:
    @John Johnson

    The vast majority of Donbass fighting has been at street level between militias and separatists/Russian soldiers out of uniform

    No. Because it is your job to spread lies and confusion, you are being deliberately amnesic about the 8 years that elapsed since 2014, and the 15,000 Russian-speaking Ukrainians, including 500 children, killed and maimed by the NATO-backed, Nazi-inspired, terror militias.

    In this interview, Russel Bentley, may God bless him, a former US soldier from Texas who has spent the last 8 years fighting in Donbass on the side of those slaughtered by the Kiev regime, explains why he went there.

    I had been following developments in Ukraine since the beginning of the Maidan protests in 2013-2014 and U.S. envoy Victoria Nuland handing out cookies to the protesters.

    On May 2, 2014, there was the Odessa Massacre, and a month later, on June 2, there was an airstrike by the Ukrainian Air Force (on U.S. orders) against the Administration Building in Lugansk. A woman named Inna Kukurudza was hit in the strike, and both her legs were blown off. A man came up filming the aftermath of the strike with his phone. Inna was still alive, but dying, and asked the man to use his phone to call her family. She did not live long enough to make the call. An iconic photo was made from that film of Inna Kukurudza looking straight into the camera.

    When I saw that photo, it was as if she was looking directly into my eyes, into my soul, and asking me personally and directly, “What are you going to do about this?” At that exact moment, I knew I was going to Donbass to protect people like Inna and to kill people like the ones who murdered her, an innocent civilian, on a nice summer afternoon. And I have done it. Six months after seeing her photo, I was in Donetsk, in the Vostok Battalion, heading to the frontline. Here is her photo. So my question to people now is, “What are you going to do about it?”


    https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2022/05/18/us-nato-waging-war-with-russia-in-ukraine-but-russia-assured-victory-russell-bentley/

  559. @Intelligent Dasein

    West Ukraine! Holy shit, they’ll be in Berlin by Christmas.

  560. Avery 说:
    @John Johnson

    {Yes I oppose all residential shelling and I do not see why you quoted the word.}

    You made another, similar grandiose claim of your alleged “humane magnanimity” above. (#328)
    We asked you to show it. (#342).
    还在等。

    As to the rest of your post: one thing is for certain — you have an incredibly imaginative mind. Or you are a garden variety GloboSorosaCadre liar.

    以机智: { Total loser that lied about being a KGB agent. He was just an average mid level office worker for the KGB and……}

    From Britannica: (no friend of Russians or Russia or Putin)
    https://www.britannica.com/biography/Vladimir-Putin

    [ Putin served 15 years as a foreign intelligence officer for the KGB (Committee for State Security), including six years in Dresden, East Germany. In 1990 he retired from active KGB service with the rank of lieutenant colonel and returned to Russia to become prorector of Leningrad State University with responsibility for the institution’s external relations. ]

  561. peterAUS 说:
    @John Johnson

    This is how the Russians do it. Reduce the area to rubble and then send in troops.

    这样的事情。
    Doesn’t work against good troops on adequate terrain. Third battle for Monte Cassino, for example. Some people here would probably now like to …ahm…discuss…. that battle/theatre/war. I wouldn’t. Distraction.

    现在,这个:

    That is what they did in Serbia.

    看起来很有趣。
    Would you care to expand on that, please?

    @虹膜

    It is really important to listen to opposite opinions to have a grasp about the volatile, fast-moving Ukraine situation.

    If that were the case you’d, with ease, find Strelkov’s material online.

    Interestingly enough (for those interested in those matters, of course…) he’s a rare survivor of “cleanup” operation by FSB in Donbass. Perhaps you could research that.
    Or, WHY, exactly, all those wartime leaders were assassinated after the cessation of major hostilities. What, EXACTLY, those guys wanted and, “incidentally”, died afterwards.
    Putintards won’t even try that, of course. Cults don’t work that way. The rest, though, could find that material interesting.

  562. geokat62 说:
    @Iris

    In this interview, Russel Bentley, may God bless him, a former US soldier from Texas who has spent the last 8 years fighting in Donbass on the side of those slaughtered by the Kiev regime, explains why he went there.

    Thanks for sharing this information with the Unz readership, Iris. I had never heard of Mr Bentley, before. It is nice to know that people like Mr. Bentley still exist in a world full of Johnsons.

    • 同意: Avery
    • 谢谢: Iris
    • 回复: @acementhead
  563. geokat62 说:

    Latest cover from the Rothschilds-owned Economist…

    If you zoom in, you’ll notice skulls for kernels of wheat.

    The intended subliminal message? Holodomor 2.0 is coming, goy!

    Talk about predictive programming.

    • 回复: @peterAUS
    , @John Johnson
  564. anon[321]• 免责声明 说:

    PeterAUShole, John’s Johnson, BTDT and the other ASVAB waivers will be perseverating here long after the last Ukie tearfully embraces the knees of his captors. The WWII guinea rout jokes will get recycled for cringing hohols. The USA will go on to get their ass kicked by China too. And PeterAUS will be here yammering ceaselessly at the guy who makes 4000 dollas a month at home.

  565. peterAUS 说:
    @geokat62

    Hegelian dialectic, in practice.

    Working as charm, so far.

  566. @Spanky

    I had decided weeks ago to not be an armchair general based on reports in any media. I do keep an eye out for reports from either side. But I keep in mind that we’re in the middle of the worst and most sophisticated disinfowars in history and I’m just a guy sitting in his living room with internet stories.

    My comment was based on the idea that the sooner all hostilities cease the better it will be for those in the war zone and more broadly for all who are suffering economic damage from this situation. In addition, every day this goes on is another day for it to escalate to include a larger theater or even to a nuclear exchange.

    • 同意: Spanky
  567. @Iris

    No. Because it is your job to spread lies and confusion, you are being deliberately amnesic about the 8 years that elapsed since 2014, and the 15,000 Russian-speaking Ukrainians, including 500 children, killed and maimed by the NATO-backed, Nazi-inspired, terror militias.

    Oh ok so first I was told incorrectly that there was some mass shelling event by the government and now we are on to reality which is that it was mostly militia fighting (with some Russian soldiers illegally mixed in).

    The separatists started the war and I can post pictures of children’s arms and legs from Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 if you would like. That was shot down by separatists and they are on video basically saying “oh crap” after it happened and looting the bodies.

    This thread is pathetic. Half of Putin’s defenders clearly haven’t even bothered spending 10 minutes reading about the conflict and who started it. I guess they think it is a good idea to put your faith in a Russian dictator who wears height enhancing shoes and doesn’t allow open internet. God knows such a confident man would never lie or exaggerate. Richest man in the world and yet wears height enhancing shoes and sends journalists to jail for asking questions.

    So you posted a picture and story of a female victim. Yea well there are thousands of them in Ukraine thanks to Putin

    Your little loser dictator has targeted hospitals and schools.

    Defend him all you want but someday he will be dead and Russian soldiers will write books about what a scumbag he was and there will be first hand accounts that are much worse than anything we see on TV. You will look back and think wow I actually defended him.

    There are already hundreds of captured phone calls where Russian soldiers talk about shooting civilians and how the whole thing is a massive disaster. Clueless Putin didn’t seem to realize that soldiers steal cell phones in war to call home. Yea well the calls are captured on Ukrainian towers and here they are talking about anti-retreat squads:

    Nothing says gorius war like anti-retreat squads.

  568. @geokat62

    If you zoom in, you’ll notice skulls for kernels of wheat.

    The intended subliminal message? Holodomor 2.0 is coming, goy!

    Yes third worlders could possibly starve without the market having access to Ukrainian grain and the Jews have nothing to do with it.

    Wheat prices are up 56% this year thanks to Putin’s war. It will get even higher and there simply won’t be enough to go around if this war continues.

    Making third worlders starve while Israel gets cheap Russian oil.

    But we critics of the war must be the Jew lovers. You keep telling yourself that. The bizrarro Unz fantasy where Putin is actually out to get the Jews that he has a long term trade relationship with.

    Should I post the picture again of Putin kissing the wall?

    This is what you get for following around some half pint Slav king. Now get mad and call me a Jew because you can’t deny that Putin has a close relationship with Israel and sells them oil.

    We need a virtual dunce cap for anytime someone resorts to yelling JEW when they can’t make an argument.

    Oh and your Slav king is reportedly deeply sick with an unknown disease. I’ll be surprised if he even makes it to August.

    • 回复: @geokat62
  569. @geokat62

    “…in a world full of Johnsons.”

    The transsexualist brigade are doing their best to remedy this sad situation.

    • 哈哈: Spanky, Iris
    • 回复: @Commentator Mike
  570. It appears the Russian Army is assuming a “defensive posture” all along the front line with the exception of Izyum and Severodonesk. The Russian offensive initiative around Izyum has stalled. The Russian offensive initiative with the goal of Severodonesk continues with almost zero progress. However it is unlikely Russia will shut down the Severodonesk operation in the short term as it is part of the Russian goal of seizing all of Lugansk Oblast, however this goal might fail. Assuming a defensive posture is equivalent to admitting defeat in all doctrines, so this thing is ending sooner than expected. It appears Russia intends to try to hold its current gains and incorporate then into the Russian Federation. This is illegal under international law and The United Nations Charter. But what choice does President Putin have? His invasion of The Ukraine has fallen flat in its face with failure to achieve all goals except to occupy Donesk and Lugansk. President Putin can claim Donesk Oblast and Lugansk Oblast want to join Russia, that is illegal under The United Nations Charter, but President Putin could simply refuse to acknowledge that, and could possibly get away with it. The south coast of The Ukraine is a different matter, there is no possible rationalization President Putin can invoke to seize this area. This present course of action by Russia, assuming a defensive posture and squatting on its pathetic gains only ensures permanent war for Russia, with Russia having the status of a rogue state similar to Saddam Hussien’s Iraq, which similarly flouted international law with its failed invasions of Iran and Kuwait, but at least Iraq’s failures had rational outcomes with restoration of recognized borders. Russia’s solution to its failure is demented and delusional. You can see it on President Putin’s face, the witless anger and crazed look of a man who is in denial of reality is almost comical, it certainly does not command respect. I have known mentally ill men who, facing the absurd ruin of their life, wore the same expression. The Ukraine will be entirely justified in continuing the war to restore it’s sovereign territory, and it’s soldiers will be easily motivated for the fight. Not so with the Russian Army. Russian soldiers will not be motivated to defend a vague line of control in another country with no prospect of eventual victory and the knowledge that they occupy the seized territory illegally. President Putin has made a fatal error. His only chance of success was to overthrow the Ukrainian government, occupy the entire country and install a proxy government that would sign a peace treaty ceding the Donbass to Russia. However even that fantasy was irrational as those types of treaties were forever made illegal by The United Nations Charter.

    • 回复: @j2
    , @Anastasia
  571. geokat62 说:
    @John Johnson

    … and the Jews have nothing to do with it.

    This should be a de rigueur disclaimer after every one of these statements:

    JFK was assassinated… and the Jews have nothing to do with it.

    USS Liberty was attacked… and the Jews have nothing to do with it.

    3,000 were killed on 9/11… and the Jews have nothing to do with it.

    The golem was tasked with taking out 7 countries in 5 years… and the Jews have nothing to do with it.

    Nudelman bragged about investing $5 B to stage a coup… and the Jews have nothing to do with it.

    Big Pharma have jabbed billions (incl little children)… and the Jews have nothing to do with it.

    • 同意: Truth Vigilante
    • 回复: @Avery
  572. @Iris

    But quoting Zionist Nr1 mouthpiece the “Daily Mail”…

    The source of the information is not the 每日邮件 but the Russian official who is intimately familiar with the ongoing war situation. That ought to be the focus, not the nature of the publication that decided to publish this news, which had been revised shortly before I shared it here. It is your problem if you cannot make a distinction between message and medium.

    This was my first comment in this thread, preceded by 567. I have not expressed an opinion on the tactical issues of the war theater, in part because there is insufficient reliable information. However, I posted this report based on the credentials and personal involvement of the source person, whose assessment should be more credible than those from Ritter.

    • 同意: Wizard of Oz
  573. @acementhead

    Maybe their propaganda works and more Johnsons … and transexuals … and … will go and volunteer to fight in the Ukraine. Perhaps a free daily ration of hard drugs and hormones could be included in the package. And if the odd one survives he can truly write he’s “been there done that”.

    • 哈哈: Passing By, W
  574. antibeast 说:
    @Been_there_done_that

    这张图片显示了俄罗斯的表现有多么糟糕。 单击图标或图像以获取增强的详细信息。 鸟瞰图显示了大约二十辆烧毁的军用车辆。

    毫无疑问,俄罗斯武装部队在军事装备方面遭受了重大损失,尤其是在乌克兰战场上的 T-72 MBT。 但这是由于地雷、路边伏击和无人机袭击造成的,乌克兰军方自 XNUMX 月以来对俄罗斯武装部队在基辅和哈尔科夫的围攻战采取了游击战术。 这就是为什么普京通过从基辅和哈尔科夫撤军,并在 XNUMX 月前将注意力集中在乌克兰南部,从而改变了俄罗斯 SMO 的作战和战术学说。 俄罗斯人现在不是蜂拥而至,而是采取老式的前线战争,在有条不紊地占领乌克兰南部的同时控制领土。 这迫使马里乌波尔的亚速营大规模投降,该营于 XNUMX 月落入俄罗斯手中。

    乌克兰军队现在士气低落,顿巴斯营的残余部队可能在未来几个月内投降。 更糟糕的是,俄罗斯一直以乌克兰军队的供应线为目标,攻击乌克兰西部的武器库,并摧毁乌克兰各地的炼油厂和火车站等关键基础设施。 俄罗斯现在正在成功地发动消耗战,缓慢但肯定地将乌克兰军队碾成浆糊。

    可以肯定的是,俄罗斯在 72 月初确实犯了操作和战术错误,在基辅和哈尔科夫的围攻中,其 T-XNUMX MBT 遭受了重大损失。 但自从 XNUMX 月作战和战术学说发生变化导致今年 XNUMX 月马里乌波尔被俘以来,今天的情况已不再如此。 普京正在赢得他的 SMO,而乌克兰现在已经沦为一个以泽林斯基为傀儡领导人的臀部国家。 将马里乌波尔的投降称为“撤离”表明了泽林斯基的妄想症,就像这里的每个巨魔都希望乌克兰人“胜利”一样。 现在唯一的问题是基辅会持续多久,而不是基辅会失去多快,因为普京正在等待时机摧毁乌克兰军队的残余。 这正是他一直以来的计划。

  575. Lurker 说:
    @YetAnotherAnon

    Rzeszow is the destination of choice. There were a lot military flights – US, UK, other NATO there. That seems to have eased off somewhat. There now seem to more of these 747 freighter flights instead.

    I wonder if we’re running out of light, expensive stuff to ship?

  576. 尽管不入侵乌克兰西部存在短期战术问题,但将战争限制在解放俄语地区符合俄罗斯的长期利益。 俄罗斯没有广泛占领所需的人力资源,但它确实拥有将乌克兰赶出顿巴斯的力量和装备。 中国、印度和南非(俄罗斯产品的重要市场)支持解放顿巴斯,但不支持进一步扩大战争。 此外,这些西方武器中的许多并没有运往顿巴斯,而是运往其他地区,以阻止俄罗斯可能在西方发动的袭击。 这告诉你 Zelensky 知道他可能会在顿巴斯输掉比赛,所以他通过保留设备来保护敖德萨等其他地方来对冲他的节拍。 因此,如果俄罗斯将战争扩大到乌克兰西部,这种西方装备只会成为一个主要问题。

    • 回复: @Iris
  577. Hartmann 说:

    希望大量欧洲人能够分享他的观点。 (标题具有误导性。)

    • 回复: @Charles Martel France
  578. @Iris

    The 15,000 murdered by the Ukronazis in the Donbass are ENTIRELY ignored by our local MSM vermin, but recently they were mentioned on the ABC by an unvetted guest. The host, a real piece of shit, simply screeched, ‘That was those killed on BOTH sides’, an UTTER, DIRTY, lie, but that is the local MSM. Evil, villainous, vicious scum. Supporting Nazis is easy for them, and their jobs depend on it.

  579. @map

    俄罗斯人民对乌克兰强盗法西斯野蛮的现实至少有七十年的回忆和认识。 这就是为什么普京对他的政策有大约 80% 的支持,以及为什么未来的俄罗斯领导人不会允许班德拉斯坦的任何遗迹成为恐俄阴谋的堡垒。 我想说的是,那些有着明确种族灭绝意图的生物实验室,永远敲定了这笔交易。

    • 回复: @map
  580. j2 说:
    @Bombercommand

    “President Putin has made a fatal error.”

    This war seems to me to have deeper goals than simply a result of Putin’s error. Putin apparently got correct intelligence from at least some people in GRU telling clearly that the strategic strike will not succeed, yet he made a strategic strike without pulling down the electricity grid, i.e., a version that requires popular support. I do not think Putin is crazy, stupid or too ill, so there is some reason for this odd behavior. Putin also interferes with military decisions (like Hitler did), which we can expect assures Russian defeat (like Hitler made decisions against his generals, assuring that Germany loses).

    It seems to me that WWI and WWII were a plan which had clear goals and they were quite well reached. These wars changed the world order and succeeded in practically everything that was planned: raised the USA as the leader, destroyed the last powerful monarchies in Germany, Austria, Russia, gave Communists an empire. These goals included creating Israel because that was a Masonic goal, now it is not Masonic, it is a ziocon goal. The “small cousins” of the Protocols of the Elders were forcibly and brutally moved to create new Israel. But the Middle East remains a conflict area, so this part of the plan was not so successful.

    The present war in Ukraine has unnaturally much and too expensive support from world leaders to be just sympathy for a nation that was attacked, or to be a necessary action to stop Putin, who may indeed be ill and not continue as the president very long. And there is Zelensky and Azov was originally funded by an oligarch. Strange indications of something familiar.

    I do not thin this war is of UkriNazis killing Russian speaking Ukrainians, or US biolabs aimed to killing Russians by bioweapons (that would cause an epidemic spreading everywhere and you make bioweapons is higher security level labs than those in Ukraine), or Ukraine building nuclear weapons (that would take time), or Ukraine joining NATO (that would also take a long time and NATO will not attack Russia).

    This war started just like the WWII: Hitler blamed Poles of killing Germans in Danzig. This time it was UkriNazis killing Russians in Donbass. And Azov were originally football hooligans and Neo-Nazis, who were originally against EU and NATO but later turned into a tool to harass Russian speakers, by some oligarch. In Danzig in 1939 there were also clashes, provoked on purpose. So, Azov killed 13,000 Russian speakers during 2014-2022, or was it so? Or was it that in the war died 14,000 people from both sides, including 3,000 Ukrainian civilians? The reasons for starting this war certainly look like a pretext, but what was the real reason?

    There was no danger of immediate attack on Russia. Putin knows well that NATO is stronger, but will not attack Russia as long as there are nuclear weapons. I do not think the threat was that color revolutions would threaten Putin’s power in Russia. That threat he could handle. Irritation because of NATO pushing close can be true, but it is not an existential threat to start a war when intelligence tells you that it will be a long and difficult war and Ukraine is likely to get weapon aid from the West, as some people in GRU apparently did tell Putin. This looks to me like Hitler attacking Poland. Germans believed Hitler aimed into Great Germany, but I conclude that he aimed into creation of Israel and destruction of Germany. Did Hitler believe he had a Jewish grandfather? Possibly yes, but probably he did not have. Or does Putin believe he has a Jewish mother? He might think so, her surname could be Jewish. That is, only a belief counts, what the truth was does not matter in these issues.

    One should look at the results of the war. If there was a plan and the plan succeeded, the aims were reached and we can conclude what the aims were from what was reached. We can see the plot in WWI and WWII by looking at the results, because the plan did succeed in most aims. Also WWI succeed in its aims. It was not a senseless war. There was Balfour Declaration, Russian revolution, loss of the British and French power, raise of the USA. What will be the outcome of this war? The West has taken made huge debts. Russia will not win because the West has decided it will lose. Russian speaking Ukrainians from Donbass may be forced to move to Russia after many of them have died as drafted soldiers or civilian causalities. Much of Donbass is destroyed and rebuilt by money from the West and seized money for reparations from Russia. What is the sense in this?

    Some commenter here in Unz said that it is the Khazar plan. Maybe. Global warming will turn the Middle East into a hot place. No sense to stay there, so a new place is needed for the “small cousins” that are so dear. A new Pale of Settlement in Donbass, as an autonomic part of Ukraine and EU. But the main aims are global politics, not the “small cousins”. Russia turned to the East. China blocked from world economy. Strong EU, reindustrialization of the West. New world order to fix present problems of global warming and globalization, with some neocon overtones. That would be a plan on the level of the WWI and WWII plans.

  581. @Iris

    Given the good relations that Putin had maintained with Zionazistan, this, if true, is an act of despicable, but predictable, treachery. What possible good does it do Israel to go in so hard for the Banderites? Why go beyond sanctions and weapons supplies?
    By always acting only in their idea of the ‘Jewish interest’, here, undoubtedly, to protect the massive investment by the likes of Kolomoisky in ‘New Khazaria’, and NEVER giving a thought to the interests of the detested goyim, the Judaic and Zionazi elites dig their own graves, century after century. It seems almost deliberate.

  582. Lurker 说:
    @Been_there_done_that

    Problem with this pic is our old friend context.

    These wrecks were grouped together after being destroyed. Therefore we don’t know over what area and over what time period these vehicles were hit. The image conveys the impression of a reasonably large Russian unit being destroyed all at once in the same place but we don’t really know that’s the case at all.

    Note the vegetation right by the vehicles – how would that be there already after a fire. And the way they are all pushed right up against each other at all angles. Some, maybe. But all of them?

    We don’t even know they are all Russian-operated. Sure, one definitely has a ‘V’ marking.

    • 谢谢: Spanky
  583. Herald 说:
    @map

    他们和乔治·索罗斯一样“纳粹”。

    案例证明。

  584. @Greg S.

    俄罗斯也肯定知道目前西方正在发生的全面内爆

    他们肯定是。 一个月前,俄罗斯政府说了类似的话(不是直接引用):
    请放心,我们正在制定针对您的制裁的对策。 并确保我们正在努力提出对您造成最大伤害的方法。

    我能想到的一些例子:
    -在美国中期前一个月切断对欧盟的石油供应,以确保油价处于最高水平并且对选举的影响最大(政权更迭,拜登先生?)
    - 在冬天之前切断对欧盟的天然气。
    - 确保非洲和中东国家有足够的信息(甚至是财政援助),说明如何在粮食短缺的情况下以难民身份到达欧盟国家。

  585. Despite all the belligerent rhetoric I feel this will somehow be resolved over the summer, and by the onset of winter at least. Is Europe really ready for a winter without gas, and the Ukraine too? I believe Ukrainians have cut off the gas supply to Europe but is Russia still supplying the Ukrainians with gas, and if so will it continue to do it indefinitely in spite of the progress of the war? By then they should have all tested their weapons systems and tactics and decided on who gets what, and can settle on something. After all it’s all about the money and cooler heads could prevail in time. Could even NS2 go online by then?

  586. @Lurker

    When I first say the pictures from the Bucha incident I thought they looked staged, and not just the dead bodies but those of the demolished tanks. The remnants of the tanks were’t bunched together like in this photo but it looked like bits of tanks were brought there from some tank scrapyard. It didn’t look convincing enough that those tanks were destroyed there and then, or recently. There’s a lot of staging going on in the imagery being provided, especially by the Ukrainian side, in collusion with the Western MSM and their Hollywood friends.

    • 回复: @Iris
  587. @Iris

    It would be great if the IDF were defeated in the Ukraine, and then Hezbollah and Hamas would just have some mopping up to do in the Middle East. Send them all to the Ukraine, the Air Force too. Let them fight for a new Khazaria. They have more right to it than to Palestine, but still less right given the present day context, or any context in fact, as it was always a criminal state full of thieves, murderers and slave drivers. Let them break their teeth, heads, necks and backs fighting for it. And the truth can then be exposed to the world: Zionist Jews fighting shoulder to shoulder with the Aryan and Slav Nazis. Hurrah, hurray for the Jews! Go Jews go! Let Kinzhal deal with them

  588. Anastasia 说:

    Russia planned a special intervention in the east because they believed they could accomplish their objectives. What Ritter is saying is that Russia did not consider all the factors he now raises. I believe Russia did consider those factors ie natos support, the west’s true goal and the Ukrainian refusal to negotiate or surrender. Maybe Ritter didn’t but I feel confident that from the beginning Russia knew the true objectives of the west and knew that Ukraine would not deviate from what the west wants – to weaken and destroy russia

    • 回复: @Wizard of Oz
  589. Anastasia 说:
    @Bombercommand

    These subjective thoughts about how Putin “looks” is totally feminine thinking

    • 回复: @Bombercommand
  590. anon[717]• 免责声明 说:
    @Richard Steven Hack

    也许他得到了一个他无法拒绝的提议?

  591. @Anastasia

    Who are these mad people that you believe want to “destroy” Russia? Who has said it? Given what you can find on Russian TV promoting the destruction of Ukraine and Ukrainians you can surely find quotable villains in the West.

    It is a mad idea when Russia is rationally dezired as an anti China ally and as a source of cheap natural resources for less resource rich countries. It may be optimistic but it does seem possible that Russia will have a government within the next 10 or 20 years that does not fantasise about restoring imperial or Siviet boundaries by force so Russia can be treated as an ordinary peaceful country.

    • 回复: @Iris
    , @mulga mumblebrain
  592. anon[717]• 免责声明 说:
    @Rev. Spooner

    Wouldn’t Evangelicals be thrilled.

    The Gog of Magog attacking Israel.

  593. @Richard Steven Hack

    您认为他之前的正确评价是什么?答案对我来说并不明显。

  594. Iris 说:
    @Alt Right Moderate

    尽管不入侵乌克兰西部存在短期战术问题,但将战争限制在仅解放俄语地区符合俄罗斯的长期利益。

    This is most likely Russia’s goal in Ukraine, and it will materialise.
    以下是已退休的英国外交官、非常优秀、思想自由的政治分析家阿拉斯泰尔·克鲁克 (Alastair Crooke) 对乌克兰未来的看法:

    乌克兰的结果正变得越来越清晰(尽管有地理细节,例如敖德萨的命运仍未解决)。 乌克兰将被肢解。 乌克兰的南部和东部最终——以某种形式——将转向俄罗斯。 乌克兰西部(加利西亚)的大部分地区最终很可能会被波兰占领。 一个臀部“中北”将是基辅剩下的一切。 后者将非常贫穷:主要是农村; 与海洋及其以前的港口隔绝; 煤炭、工业和农业基地被驱除. 欧盟将不得不拿起基辅的“标签”。

    它不必是这样的。 鲍里斯·约翰逊(Boris Johnson)拒绝泽连斯基与俄罗斯的任何交易负有重大责任。

    It is not always easy to identify paid-for NATO-affiliated opinions, or assess the alleged “expertise” of some military exposés, but there is one sure proof that common sense understands: almost every country of the Global South have refused to condemn Russia’s operation in Ukraine.

    总的来说,美国的反俄运动紧随其后的是不民主的、被政治劫持的欧盟,以及通常的英联邦贵宾犬国家,它们的总收入不到 10% of the planet’s population.

    那些拒绝拖线的人不仅仅是在无忧无虑地对冲他们的赌注:印度因不支持基辅而受到美国的强烈威胁。 只是大多数全球南方国家的大多数军事专家可能得出的结论是,俄罗斯获胜的可能性很大。

    像阿富汗一样,乌克兰将被毁灭。 和以前一样,美国将这场冲突神话化为“胜利”。 但实际上,俄罗斯赢了。 美国的胜利将证明是代价高昂的。

    Russia is left standing; it has maintained itself and survived. Its’ key alliance with China is intact. Its economy is stabilising, despite European all out financial war – and the global South – Africa, the Middle East and Asia – all refused to join with the US sanctions call. (Exceptions: Singapore, Japan, “Israel” – and Pakistan, which had to be colour–revolution’s into changing its stance).

    https://english.almayadeen.net/articles/analysis/the-longer-telegram:-ukraine

  595. @Iris

    almost every country of the Global South have refused to condemn Russia’s operation in Ukraine.

    Just wait until a not negligible portion of their populations begin to starve and riot. By then they will all know which country bears primary responsibility for causing the basic food shortages that will impact them the most.

    • 同意: Wizard of Oz
    • 巨魔: Corvinus
    • 回复: @Commentator Mike
  596. @Lurker

    These wrecks were grouped together after being destroyed. Therefore we don’t know over what area and over what time period these vehicles were hit. The image conveys the impression of a reasonably large Russian unit being destroyed all at once in the same place but we don’t really know that’s the case at all.

    Boy the delusion level here has been turned up to 11.

    What are you suggesting? There were multiple battles at the spot where they tried to cross?

    This entire battle is being monitored by satellites. They aren’t telling fibs.

    The Russians tried to move a battalion across the river at one of the shortest points. The Ukrainians correctly guessed the point and then watched them with a drone. When they crossed the Ukes called in artillery.

    We don’t even know they are all Russian-operated. Sure, one definitely has a ‘V’ marking.

    Sure…..they could be Chinese or German… or props from a Hollywood movie .

    Russian media reports that Russian colonel was killed during botched river crossing
    https://www.newsweek.com/russian-colonel-killed-ukraine-during-botched-river-crossing-1707765

    • 回复: @Wokechoke
    , @Lurker
  597. @Commentator Mike

    Do you not recognise the delusional state of Russell Bentley’s mind as sufficient to make him entirely unreliable and a waste of time to read? Apart from things said that one knows to be false the key to not being caught up by his delusions is to recognise his grandiosity which has him making dozens of assertions of fact that he cannot possibly know to be fact.

  598. @Iris

    Have you not noticed that there was a large majority of counties in the UN General Assembly that condemned the invasion?

    Assuming that the best result for Russia is securing the whole of the two separitist oblasts from Ukranian occupation and control what follows? Is it not probable that the NATO and EU provided artillery would destroy the separitists’ cities as Russia has destroyed Mariupol?

  599. @Been_there_done_that

    Fool, it is not Russia that will be causing it but the US and West’s sanctions. Those people are smart enough to know unlike your populations.

    • 回复: @Been_there_done_that
  600. @Iris

    Are you sure it’s just the Western governments that are backing the Ukraine against Russia? Did you ask the people who they back and what they think about their governments’ action on the Ukraine question?

  601. Iris 说:
    @Commentator Mike

    There’s a lot of staging going on in the imagery being provided, especially by the Ukrainian side, in collusion with the Western MSM and their Hollywood friends.

    Exactly. Notwithstanding any sympathy for one side or the other, one has to upheld a modicum of objective intellectual standards, with not much to show for on the Western propaganda side.

    But the MSM hype is deliberate: pretending that Ukraine is “winning” while it is losing everything is part of the agenda. It is similar to encouraging the deluded, drugged-up, lousy boxer to go on and die on the ring because he was secretly bet against. Ukraine is just being used a sacrificial geopolitical scapegoat, to further trap Russia, by those who pretend Ukraine is winning.

    There is a number of major differences between Russian “propaganda” and NATO/Ukraine “propaganda”, which make the former far more credible:
    – Russians never pretend to knowingly comment on areas not under their control; Kiev does that all the time.
    – The Russian side has war journalists indisputably reporting in real-time from the ground it claims to control. Not just uninditiable satellite imagery.
    – Kiev has made too many claim of victories that turned out to be defeats, with these failed claims simply swept under the carpet.
    – Kiev’s semantics to describe major events defies common sense: Azovstal for instance was a plain and simple Ukrainian surrender, and an expected one at that, and no twisted wording can change this fact.
    – The Kiev/NATO side puts far too much insistence on what commentator Anastasia @605 rightly called “feminine thinking“. There is far too much focus on Putin’s appearance, body language, daughters, family, girlfriend, alleged palace coups in preparation and other simpletonic gossipy statements.
    The Western MSM information material belongs to a village women hair salon gossip, not to strategic culture. Hence the obvious conclusion: it is worthless.

    • 同意: Commentator Mike
    • 回复: @j2
    , @j2
  602. Passing By 说:

    Because the mission of the Western MSM isn’t to inform but to manage perception. Which leads to wallowing in delusions. Which can lead to frustration and panic when the consequences of ignoring reality finally kick in. Which can lead to disastrous decisions. The “cosmic cretinism” of Western elites, as Dmitry Medvedev put it, is threatening life on Earth. I hope the Russians recognise it and I hope they will take the right measures to prevent Western idiots from causing a terminal catastrophe.

  603. michael888 说:
    @BlackC

    The Special Miltary Operation can be applied (with kid gloves) to the East and Coast, and perhaps that’s Putin’s focus, almost ignoring Kiev, Lviv, Galicia and the Western half of Ukraine for now.

    但为了阻止乌克兰军队获得炮灰和美国武器的补给,俄罗斯在某个时候将不得不进入震惊和敬畏(屠杀)模式。也许俄罗斯人认为在西方被轰炸屈服之前必须加强地面部队?或者普京认为,如果他在乌克兰西部发动真正的战争,北约将会进行更多干预?

  604. j2 说:
    @Iris

    我喜欢你 Iris,但让我更正你评论的这一部分。

    “There is a number of major differences between Russian “propaganda” and NATO/Ukraine “propaganda”, which make the former far more credible:
    – Russians never pretend to knowingly comment on areas not under their control; Kiev does that all the time.”

    Russians are very often making claims of having advanced. You can see them in the maps of the Insitutute for the Study of War, where they are marked as “claimed Russian advances”. I have followed maps of this war closely and the Russian claimed advances are often not true.

    “– The Russian side has war journalists indisputably reporting in real-time from the ground it claims to control. Not just uninditiable satellite imagery.”

    西方国家有许多战地记者无可争辩地从地面实时报道。 我关注过波兰和土耳其的记者,但我偶尔也关注过很多其他的。

    “– Kiev has made too many claim of victories that turned out to be defeats, with these failed claims simply swept under the carpet.”

    我真的不记得基辅的任何胜利声明,结果证明是失败。 然而,我记得例如俄罗斯声称摧毁了乌克兰空军,然后乌克兰空军被简单地扫到了地毯下。 我还记得亲俄分析家的许多说法,比如在这个网站上。 他们是假的,只是扫在地毯下。

    “– Kiev’s semantics to describe major events defies common sense: Azovstal for instance was a plain and simple Ukrainian surrender, and an expected one at that, and no twisted wording can change this fact.”

    在泽连斯基就战俘交换进行谈判后,亚速斯塔尔的守军被命令投降。 作为士兵,只要他们得到拯救生命的命令,他们就会保持保卫的命令。 军人必须服从。 由于在向士兵下达此命令之前已商定交换战俘,因此此案并非简单的乌克兰投降。 这是谈判的立场离开。 如果您有任何军事背景,您应该了解其中的区别。

    “– The Kiev/NATO side puts far too much insistence on what commentator Anastasia @605 rightly called “feminine thinking“. There is far too much focus on Putin’s appearance, body language, daughters, family, girlfriend, alleged palace coups in preparation and other simpletonic gossipy statements.””

    在这一点上我们同意。 基辅情报负责人推测普京的病情以及情报界可能反对普京。 情报的一项任务是宣传。 另一方面,俄罗斯有一支强大的巨魔军队,声称泽连斯基用他的鸡巴弹钢琴,所以我想平衡是俄罗斯方面的水平远低于这一领域的腰带。 亲俄罗斯的人对军事事务知之甚少。

    祝你一切顺利,爱丽丝。

    • 回复: @Brewer
  605. @michael888

    …Russia will have to go into Shock and Awe (Slaughter) mode.

    Wasn’t Russia’s publicly stated war goal “去纳粹化“, and haven’t all the remaining Azov Brigade members – those alleged evil hard-core Nazis with tattoos of ancient symbols – peacefully surrendered in Mariupol and been taken away as prisoners of war? Wouldn’t that mean that Russia has now finally achieved its operational goal and can thus declare victory?

    Or are you perhaps suggesting that all Ukrainians are actually “纳粹“, that need to be annihilated, not just those still within Ukraine but also the others in all the nearby countries to which they fled, so that they cannot reconstitute themselves to possibly pose an existential threat in the future? It seems your fantasy or recommendation is not sufficiently specific.

  606. @Iris

    It would be polite to describe your response as merely “lazy”.

    Apparently you see no problem in abusing someone as a “militant Zionist” without taking the trouble to examine my comments and discover that I am not any kind of Zionist.

    More damaging to your credit is the intellectual weakness implicit in your citing as evidence of “the West” planning to “destroy” Russia a Rand “brief” which used “weaken” where the claim I criticised said “destroy”. Moreover the connection to government policy in the West was explicitly negated in these words:

    Some of the options examined are clearly more promising than others,
    but any would need to be evaluated in terms of the overall U.S. strategy for dealing
    with Russia, which neither the report nor this brief has attempted to do.

    You really are a fool. My comment wasn’t even addressed to you – unless ou are also Anastasia – and yet you blunder in with obvious errors.

    • 哈哈: Iris
  607. anon[358]• 免责声明 说:

    There’s a lot of feckless JTRIG grunts waving their pom-poms for cringing nazis in POW camps. You might think they’re idiots, and they’re certainly making fools of themselves, but they’re pseudonymous, to most, and they have their orders.

    Watch the frantic forum-sliding when we mention that Olsen and four more US NOCs will be publicly tried for use of banned biological weapons in a Russian terror tribunal.

  608. @Commentator Mike

    Fool, it is not Russia that will be causing it but the US and West’s sanctions.

    As usual you are the real fool because your comment makes absolutely no sense. Again you have exposed yourself as a Russian shill or troll, lying shamelessly while appealing to readers being sufficiently stupid or biased enough to believe your nonsense. The US and West’s sanctions against Russian exports ought to mean that a greater supply than otherwise, of grain and other basic foods from Russia, would be available to the poorer countries in the south. (The US and the West are not sanctioning those poor countries that import food.)

    The higher prices and anticipated food shortages are being caused by Russian disruptions reducing the overall supply, due to theft of Ukrainian storage silos and bombings of facilities that provide fuel for tractors, preventing of planting, harvesting, processing, or shipments through a naval blockade. Once all the Russian military ships in the area around Odessa will have been sunk, so that they cannot continue their blockade of merchant ships carrying basic food from Ukraine, billions of impoverished people throughout the world can rejoice.

    • 回复: @Wokechoke
    , @Commentator Mike
  609. Wokechoke 说:
    @John Johnson

    Shut up kike. The Ukies are collapsing.

  610. Wokechoke 说:
    @Been_there_done_that

    The Ukies are collapsing now. Is this all you’ve got?

  611. Wokechoke 说:
    @John Johnson

    The Russians will cross at will. Especially since they can drive from Popasnaya due north and across from Izyum.

    The entire course of the Donets from Oskil to Lysychansk is turned.

    • 回复: @John Johnson
  612. @Anastasia

    You ignore, as you have to, my basic point, that Russia is now assuming a defensive posture. Assuming a defensive posture, with a few rare exceptions, is a sure sign an army is entering the stage of defeat. This is particularly true when the army started by conducting an offensive initiative, as is the case with Russia’s invasion of The Ukraine.

    • 哈哈: Passing By
  613. @Wokechoke

    The Russians will cross at will. Especially since they can drive from Popasnaya due north and across from Izyum.

    The entire course of the Donets from Oskil to Lysychansk is turned.

    Yes another 72 hour mop up operation I’m sure.

  614. Avery 说:
    @geokat62

    Apparently you hit a nerve [geokat62]:

    The so-called (((John Johnson))) went to pieces and stepped on his dong and outed himself as an Israeli hasbara/American neocon warmongering Jew: hiding under an Anglo name.

    做得好。

    • 回复: @geokat62
  615. geokat62 说:
    @Avery

    Thx, Avery… appreciate it.

  616. @Been_there_done_that

    Well it depends on who you blame for starting all this. You always try to work everything so to put all the blame on only one side and to present everything exclusively from a one sided perspective. You certainly are not an objective observer.

    • 回复: @Been_there_done_that
  617. @Wizard of Oz

    Come on Wizz. The Western policy towards Russia has been unrelentingly hostile and bent on destruction since at least 1989. If you think that this Bland Corporation ‘study’ is the only such document, then you’re sadly mistaken.
    The aim, as you well know, is a unipolar world, controlled by the USA and the Anglosphere stooges, plus the EU in a subaltern role, FOREVER. That is the essence of Manifest Destiny and American Exceptionalism. Full Spectrum Dominance-surely you’ve heard of that. And the febrile rush to war since the fascist takeover in Ukraine in 2014, the ceaseless aggression against China, the multiple subversions in Xinjiang, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Tibet etc, the ruthless provocations in Chinese coastal waters, the Quad and Aukus goon-squads, the scores of military bases surrounding China, the villainous racist hate propaganda against China the litters the Western MSM, without dissent etc, all show that the ‘Gods Upon the Earth (and little godlings like yourself) are ENRAGED by a non-Western, non-European power rising to global eminence. Russia is just a stepping-stone to the Big One-a Race War against China.

    • 同意: Avery, Spanky, Commentator Mike
    • 回复: @Wizard of Oz
  618. Anonymous[189]• 免责声明 说:
    @j2

    You’re joking of course, for Ukraine is calling up its last line of defense now with 50+ year olds filling those ranks and Ukraine could no more field a million-man army than elephants can fly, by the time you factor in its population the percentage of the old and the young the disabled those that may meet the criteria but have are fleeing the country to escape the meat grinder you’re going to be thousands short of your ghost army of a million men.

    • 回复: @j2
  619. Anonymous[189]• 免责声明 说:
    @Sean

    Get it through your head sucker,the Ukraine is GONE as you knew it like the CRIMEA it just packed up its bags and caught the quickest train out of town to Poland or some place in the EU or Russia. All that is left are the dope heads, Nazis’s and those that lack the means of going anyplace else and no matter how many billions of dollars we send them the outcome will remain the same. And lol all those Russian generals have 9 lives because they always seem to come back to life after the propaganda is over.

  620. @Hartmann

    或许是害怕在德国国家电视台的反俄媒体政策下丢掉工作,麦施伯格不断地向这位诚实而勇敢抵抗的客人抛出反俄谎言,并设法让自己的信息听清楚。事实上,此时此刻与俄罗斯展开谈判是没有意义的,因为是美国人在阻碍和平解决,并阻止泽伦斯基以中立为基础,摆脱美国挑起的不必要的问题。

    The guest in his recent book ” National Interest ” stated that the Americans do not respect the German national interest. Only the Germans themselves could do that. There were times that the Americans operated militarily ( tactical nuclear weapons) in Germany without informing the German government. The 93 years old guest who took part in the fighting towards the end of WWII and whose father was killed in a concentration camp for participating in resistance activities also believes that the position of Biden on Ukraine is connected to his domestic issues like the coming november elections.

  621. @Commentator Mike

    Well it depends on who you blame for starting all this.

    And now you have given us an encore to validate your stupidity. We were specifically discussing Russian disruptions of Ukrainian food production. Ukraine is not voluntarily refraining from producing and exporting food. A few delusional folks like you will refuse to acknowledge what is obvious while the rest of the world will understand that Russian behavior is to blame. It would not be the first time in history for Russia to have engaged in mass starvation under some pretext.

    • 同意: Wizard of Oz
  622. Lurker 说:
    @John Johnson

    你有什么建议?

    I’m suggesting what I thought it should have been obvious I was suggesting.

    The picture implies that this group of vehicles were all destroyed in the same place at the same time. Therefore conveying an impression of intense battle. If they were collected from multiple locations over days of fighting that conveys a different impression.

    It still represents the same loss. But here’s a thought experiment: Is losing 20 vehicles in one hour more telling than losing 20 vehicles in one month?

    These wrecks have certainly been moved into position – even if it was merely prior to shipping them off for scrap. Its the image I’m talking about. Look at the vegetation. Where are the scorch marks on the ground? There appears to be a pile of galvanized sheeting dumped in at the left. Scrap pile!

    And again I refer to their positioning. Two of them are even stacked on top of each other! No way would would they be parked like that prior to being attacked. It makes no sense. Would you and your friends park your cars like that?

    Also there seems no logical reason for them to be arranged like that ,我们将参加 combat. I can just imagine the vehicle commander: “Driver! Park next to that APC thats on fire. No, literally, I want us touching it.”

  623. @Lurker

    Also there seems no logical reason for them to be arranged like that during combat.

    These vehicles were not engaged in combat at the time of their destruction. They were bunched together because they were waiting to cross a makeshift pontoon bridge across a river. One would call that a bottleneck situation. The image is clear evidence of an embarrassingly sloppy operational procedure, but then one cannot expect better coordination from such an army, which had already exposed itself before military observers and analysts to be relatively incompetent. (See article below for another example.)

    Also, note how closely many of the vehicles are positioned next to a fuel truck. They were likely filling their tanks with diesel at that time so that they would have their maximum range as soon as they crossed to the other side. One should enlarge the image to its full resolution with the (+) pointer to appreciate the details and make reasonable inferences.

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10772127/Cheap-Chinese-tyres-bought-corrupt-officials-blame-Russias-stalled-advance.html

    每日邮件 - 可能是1,2022

    ‘Cheap Chinese tyres bought by corrupt officials’ may be to blame for Russian trucks and armoured vehicles getting stuck in the mud in Ukraine

    • Russian vehicles may be getting stuck in the mud due to cheap Chinese tyres
    ...
    • Poor tyre quality may be forcing Russia to use roads instead of harsher terrain, grouping the military targets together and leaving them more exposed

  624. map 说:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    什么法西斯野蛮行径? 超过70年? 除非俄罗斯人计划否认斯大林,否则乌克兰人的大饥荒就悬在俄罗斯人的头上。

    • 巨魔: mulga mumblebrain
    • 回复: @mulga mumblebrain
  625. @Lurker

    My imperfect eyes left me in doubt as to what burned out vehicles I was seeing. Many of themooked to me as though they could have been ordinary civilian automobiles (or the staff cars where about-to- be-deceased generals are located for ease of targeting).

    • 回复: @mulga mumblebrain
  626. j2 说:
    @Anonymous

    “You’re joking of course, for Ukraine is calling up its last line of defense now with 50+ year olds filling those ranks and Ukraine could no more field a million-man army than elephants can fly, by the time you factor in its population the percentage of the old and the young the disabled those that may meet the criteria but have are fleeing the country to escape the meat grinder you’re going to be thousands short of your ghost army of a million men. ”

    No, I am not joking. However, Ukrainian separatists seem to have the problem you mention. Russians are calling their last men up to 65 (!, not 60 as traditionally) to service. In that side you may be correct, their effort is unsustainable as the population is small.

    The traditional calculation of a conscript wartime army is 1/10 of the population. This figure is sustainable, i.e., it has women and enough old men to run all necessary activities in the country in the war time. As the Ukraine population is c. 40 million, their traditional conscript wartime army size would be 4 million, excluding women. This 1/10 is what was realized in many countries in the WWII time, so it has been tested and is possible. One million, that Ukraine intend to call to service, is very conservative and only reflects that to an army you also need weapons, not only men. Ukrainian men have been coming to the country from abroad and the refugees in Western countries are mainly women and children with some older men.

    As for the combat value of reservists, it depends on where they are used. One year conscript service, even half a year, gives a quite sufficient basic training for infantry. As this training is by endless drills, it is never forgotten and very fast recalled. Even I still remember all I learned in my conscript service. Weapon systems change, but most of the conscript army is infantry that does not change so much. To say that infantry is cannot fodder is incorrect. Whether it is depends on how it is used. Officers are the ones giving commands and they usually are staff officers, except for the company level. Modern weapon systems are used by soldiers trained in using them, so this is not such a problem as you may think: Ukraine still has enough of recently trained soldiers. A conscript army is different from a professional army, but underestimating a conscript army is an error.

    • 回复: @Iris
    , @Lurker
  627. @mulga mumblebrain

    “Full spectrum domince” never impinged ex ept as a rather windy pretentious name probably cooked up bysome retired colonels/think tankers who were saying the more or less obvious. If some warming innovation could possibly be critical you had better not be behind even in that one area

    I have just found William Engdahl’s book via Google and Amazon. Very favourably reviewed I see but not much read .

    I recall thinking in 1991 that the way Iraq was defeated must have humbled at of old Soviet cold warriors precise because the US demonstrated what might be called “full spectrum dominance”. However I said, publicly, on the record, in 1999 that were about to enter the Chiese Century [OK I wasn’t so smart then about comparative demographics]. If I have paid less attention to what America has been doing militarily and why it is because I do not have access to all the simplified certainties of fact about plans and motives of typically passionate and angry UR commenters – and not a few contributors.

    • 回复: @mulga mumblebrain
  628. Dubik 说:
    @Falcon 22

    The purpose and aim of bringing Ukraine into NATO was/is to place US nuks on Russia’s border, 2″ minutes from Moscow, neutralizing Russia’s own nuks.
    This has been the long held plan if US/NATO. Putin knew it. 2″ doesn’t allow Russia time to even arm and launch their arsenal in reply.
    US has gained an effective 1st strike capability. Putin was fully aware of the plsan.
    An existential threat to Russia.
    Hr could not ignore it. He couldn’t wait until the nucs were installed.
    你懂了?

  629. j2 说:
    @Iris

    Iris, if you want to check how correctly or falsely Ukraine high command informs of the war situation and if they make several claims of victories that later turn out to be false and are swept under the carpet, please follow these official announcements:
    https://www.ukrinform.net/

    And compare them with the actual war situation. The maps of the Institute for the Study of War come from Washington, which you naturally do not trust, but I give a map that I consider better. It is collected by some of our reservists from several available sources (including both Russian and Ukrainian) and they have made the effort of plotting the battle lines. You can see that Russian gains in the Donbass operation have been quite small. The attack is very slowly gaining ground, but with heavy losses. The losses are always higher in the side that attacks, as artillery against fortified lines is not as effective as you may think. So, here is the map:
    https://www.scribblemaps.com/maps/view/The-War-in-Ukraine/091194

    The map is not intentionally biased to any direction and about as good as can be concluded due to the fog of war. This war is not going that well for Russia. But check also the ISW maps (daily conflict updates, changes daily), they have some information that is not here,
    https://understandingwar.org/backgrounder/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment-may-20

    and also also liveuamap.
    https://liveuamap.com/

    Not to say anything negative of Russian information, but these maps are really the best information of the war situation. They are not MSM propaganda, but rather good efforts to describe the front lines and they show that Russian attack is not achieving its operational goals, or achieving so slowly that they will not be reached before the expected turning point of the war.

    Cheers, j2

    • 回复: @Iris
  630. Brewer 说:
    @J.T.

    观看此视频,了解俄罗斯在开展旨在避免平民伤亡的有限行动方面的出色表现,以及美国/北约在摧毁平民方面的出色表现。

  631. Brewer 说:
    @j2

    泽伦斯基用他的鸡巴弹钢琴:

    • 回复: @j2
  632. @Wizard of Oz

    绿野仙踪写道:

    Apparently you see no problem in abusing someone as a “militant Zionist” without taking the trouble to examine my comments and discover that I am not any kind of Zionist.

    Dunce of Oz, I have taken the time to examine your commentary over an extended period and it is evident that you are, most assuredly, a rabid Zionist and consistent apologist for all Judeo-Fascist criminality.

    • 谢谢: Iris
    • 哈哈: Wizard of Oz
  633. j2 说:
    @Brewer

    是的,泽连斯基用他的鸡巴弹钢琴似乎是亲俄罗斯人为什么俄罗斯赢得这场战争的主要论据之一。 但严肃地说,在军事意义上,退役上校米哈伊尔·霍达里奥诺克首先在俄罗斯电视上怀疑俄罗斯的机会然后改变了主意,而且乌克兰人声称哈尔科夫特罗普斯指挥官在俄罗斯人被击退后被解雇,因为是普京生病与否的问题。

    这场战争,目前俄罗斯人费了很大的力气攻占顿巴斯,最终可能会成功,但这并不是一场决定性的战斗,更不用说包围顿巴斯,困住乌克兰军队。 在我看来,乌克兰失去了一次机会,因为等待西方武器,而不是在俄罗斯人撤出基辅后不久进行反攻。 那会有风险,但仍然比等待俄罗斯人变得更强大之后有更好的机会。 无论顿巴斯发生什么,都不会改变对这场战争的预测:乌克兰不会耗尽任何战争必需品(人员、武器、食物、资金、士气),也不会接受停火,因此俄罗斯不会赢得这场战争,并将无法保持它已经获得的基础,因为它最终会耗尽一些必不可少的东西。 这只是一个转折点何时发生的问题。

    • 回复: @Brewer
    , @antibeast
  634. @map

    从 1943-4 年开始,在加利西亚和沃利尼亚杀死了几万波兰人。 撇开犹太人、罗姆人、俄罗斯人等不谈。哦,我明白了,你赞成。 把你调制的 Holomodor 推到你的基础上。

    • 回复: @Gimpward
  635. Dr Kevin Barrett is a regular contributor to the Unz Review and highly respected on a range of issues due to the depth and breadth of his geopolitical acumen.

    Here is what he had to say on the recent events in Mariupol:

    Most of the pro-Ukraine anti-Russia propaganda amounts to some combination of outrageous lies and deceptive spin. Sometimes it’s unintentionally hilarious.

    A few days before the Azovstol Nazis surrendered to Russian troops, the Times of Israel ran a story calling them “Jewish heroes.” Then when the Nazi Jewish heroes surrendered, the entire mainstream media, led by The New York Times, The Washington Post, CNN, and Reuters, credited the UkroNazi regime with “evacuating” them (by ordering them to surrender)!

    In reality, the only thing they evacuated was their bowels as they crawled out of their holes waving white flags and whimpering for mercy.

    That pretty much sums up the reality on the ground in this Zionist proxy war.

    The peddlers of pro-Ukrainian fiction in the commentary of UR would do well to listen and learn from Dr Barrett.

    • 同意: Iris
    • 谢谢: Commentator Mike
    • 回复: @Wizard of Oz
  636. @Wizard of Oz

    You’re turning into a real enthusiast for the Ukronazis aren’t you Wizz. Got your first tattoo yet? What was it? 88? A wolfsangel? Black Sun? Or the old favourite, the swastika? Or the full ?elensky, in stilletos, across your back?

    • 回复: @Wizard of Oz
    , @Avery
  637. @Wizard of Oz

    ‘Full Spectrum Superiority’ defined by the US Department of Defence (sic) as, ‘ The cumulative effect of DOMINANCE (my capitals)in the air, land, maritime and space domains and information environment, which includes cyberspace, that permits the conduct of joint operations without effective opposition or prohibitive interference’.
    The Yanks, being generally cowardly blowhards, far prefer killing for ‘Feedom’ than dying for it, so they prefer their victims supine and powerless, so they can get on with the fun of mass murder of civilians, destruction of protected infrastructure, destruction of cultural heritage and other markers of Exceptionalism. I can see why you love licking those old Yankee jack-boots, Wizz. Makes you feel big, I imagine.

  638. Iris 说:
    @j2

    Russians are calling their last men up to 65 (!, not 60 as traditionally) to service.

    Hi J2. Not sure where you are getting this information from, but it appears it is the other way round. It is the Ukrainian forces which are mobilising men unwilling or unfit for combat.

    The information below is from Ukrainian website Strana, not from Russian sources.

    “With machine guns against tanks”. Why are the fighters of the territorial defence, who are sent to the front line, increasingly rebelling?

    “We are sent to certain death”

    https://www.strana.best/news/391698-kak-narastaet-bunt-sredi-vojujushchikh-na-donbasse-bojtsov-teroborony-s-zapadnoj-ukrainy-.html

    In Transcarpathia, revolt against mobilization.
    In the city of Khust, Transcarpathian region, local women stormed the military recruitment office, protesting against their husbands from the territorial defence being sent to the front.

    Almost half a thousand men who have not undergone the necessary military training to be taken to the east of Ukraine.

    https://www.strana.best/news/388915-cheho-zhdat-ot-bunta-protiv-mobilizatsii-na-zakarpate-.html

    Servicemen of the platoon of the 3rd battalion of the 115th brigade rebel and record a video ultimatum from Severodonetsk to Zelensky and the commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Zaluzhny.

    The 115th TRO Brigade was formed in Zhytomyr. Now it is fighting in the Luhansk region, which the enemy is now actively trying to encircle and shell.

    “We refuse to carry out combat missions because we do not have reinforcements. There is no heavy machinery. We have been waiting for reinforcements for two weeks, but there is none. We are being sent to certain death. There is no command. There is no technique and no respect for people,” said one of the fighters.

    https://www.strana.best/news/390226-v-ukraine-narastaet-nedovolstvo-otpravkoj-na-front-bojtsov-teroborony.html

    Transcarpathia is at the extreme West of Ukraine. So if unfit combatants are being mobilised so far out in the country, what does it tell about the state of the Ukrainian forces?

    • 回复: @j2
  639. @mulga mumblebrain

    You completely missed my almost opposite point. But while I have your attention can you add to my knowledge of your beloved. symbol, sometimes c
    alled the swastika?

    I thought I had nailed down from online sources that the Nazi Hakenkreuz was only, authenticly, facing so it’s outward angle at the top went to the right. But someone posted me a picture , for comparison with a recent one, of German soldiers (maybe 200+ of them) lined up so that, from the air the swastikathey formed was pointing the other way. Of course the pic could easily have been reversed deliberately or accidentally but it raised the question about the Nazi symbol. Indeed I had already been puzzled that a Nazi flag would have to be regarded as only one-sided if authenticity depended on which way the Kreuz was bent. I want to be able to use the innocent Buddhist/Hindu/Neolithic symbol to tease those who jump to conclusions😎

    • 回复: @mulga mumblebrain
  640. @Truth Vigilante

    You implicitly affirm that Kevin Barrett has some authority to say the following and have you accept it as a true and fair account of the surrender of Ukrainian troops in Mariupol

    In reality, the only thing they evacuated was their bowels as they crawled out of their holes waving white flags and whimpering for mercy.

    怎么来的?

  641. j2 说:
    @Iris

    “Hi J2. Not sure where you are getting this information from, but it appears it is the other way round. It is the Ukrainian forces which are mobilising men unwilling or unfit for combat.”

    No, the age when a conscript is in reserve is typically up to either 55 or 60. To extend this time to 65 means calling last reserves. This has nothing to do with these men being unwilling or unfit for combat. It is simply the question of age. In a conscript army you must leave some men to do civilian tasks, so if you have to call 65 years old men (even if they are fit and willing) to service, you are destroying the economy and will not last long in the war. Ukraine still keeps the reservist max. age at 60, which is normal. The separatists areas have it at 65, which is not normal and not fine.

    For the information that Russians have raised the mobilization age from 55 to 65, we can look for instant at RFE/RL (this is the Radio Free Europe, which used to be CIA white propaganda, but is no longer CIA, but even at that early time it usually gave white propaganda, i.e., the facts were checked and correct. You may be too young, but Radio Free Europe was much listened to in the Eastern Block during Soviet times and if was found more reliable than governmental sources.)
    “Such a move could also open the door for Moscow to begin drafting local men to fight alongside its forces in Ukraine, as it has already done through a mandatory mobilization of men aged 18 to 65 in separatist-controlled parts of Ukraine.”
    https://www.rferl.org/a/ukraine-kherson-occupation-referendum/31817806.html

    As for this whether Ukraine separatists want to be called to service, there is e.g. Guardian article
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/apr/28/donetsk-separatists-desperate-draft-campaign-empties-streets-of-men-ukraine
    “In a sign of how desperate pro-Russia authorities are to bolster the ranks of fighters, in late March they announced that the upper age limit of the draft had been raised from 55 to 65 in Donetsk, local media reported. And on Saturday authorities announced a mobilisation in the region of Kherson, which was largely captured by Russia after the war began. Men who do not want to become cannon fodder in a war they do not support, against a country – Ukraine – that most of them still consider their own, are spending their days in hiding. Locals joke that they now live in a town of Amazons, run by women. Husbands, sons and brothers live in basements or locked indoors. They cannot stay in their own homes because registration is by address. Instead they stay at the homes of friends or relatives where no military-age men are listed as residents.”

    You can evaluate whether The Guardian is more reliable than your source Strana
    “Strana.ua is a pro-Russian[1] online publication in Ukraine, opened on February 16, 2016, by Igor Guzhva. In February 2017, the site had the worst balance of opinions and journalistic standards, along with Korrespondent, Obozrevatel and Vesti.[2] According to a December 2021 study by the Institute of Mass Media [uk], only 38% of the material on this site did not violate professional journalistic standards”
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strana.ua

    However, I did not comment on the willingness of the men to fight. I commented that the age 65 means that you are taking the last reserves. It is done only in a desperate situation by normal countries. Still the last step is to take boys below 18. (who have no conscript service, most men in Ukraine have basic conscript service.)

    • 回复: @j2
  642. Brewer 说:
    @j2

    “泽连斯基用他的鸡巴弹钢琴似乎是亲俄者为何俄罗斯赢得这场战争的主要论点之一”
    这与谁赢得战争无关,但现实肯定会反驳那些断言的人:“俄罗斯有一支强大的巨魔军队,声称泽伦斯基用他的鸡巴弹钢琴”
    我还有其他“强大的巨魔军队”产品可以帮助您吗?

  643. Iris 说:
    @j2

    Hi J2. President Zelensky President just said on television broadcast that he would consider it “胜利” if Ukraine manages to return to the demarcation line that existed on February 24.

    He also added that it would be very difficult to return all the territories of Ukraine by military means and that it would cost a huge number of lives of Ukrainians.

    Zelensky said that after (hypothetically) reaching the demarcation line that existed on February 24, the second stage should come – through negotiations – to return the remaining territory.

    So in summary, Zelensky is:
    – recognising that the Ukrainian forces have lost control of so much of national territory that simply returning to the status quo pre-24 February, where the Donbass was already long-controlled by Russian-speaking separatists, would be considered a “victory”.
    – that Crimea is gone forever and cannot be brought back only through negotiations and good will from Russia.

    So basically, all this war effort, destruction and deaths that NATO advocated can only, in best case, return Ukraine back to where it was in Feb 2022, when Russia was still offering her to negotiate.

    Does these statements direct from the horse’s mouth look like Ukraine is “winning”?

    Ritter, Bacevich and other formerly-objective US analysts are so obviously wrong that one wonders why they are endorsing the “Russia is losing” narrative.

    These people are either hopelessly blinded by their Cold war blinkers, or they are just US military at heart, happy , too, to slaughter the foolish Ukraine sacrificial goat to the enhancement of American geopolitical status.

    • 回复: @Avery
    , @j2
  644. j2 说:
    @j2

    Transcarpathia ia historically and culturally part of Hungary. They probably share the Hungarian pro-Russian views. However, most Ukrainian men have done conscript service, so why not them?

    As the country had a civil war, we should expect that there are quite many pro-Russians and pro-Russian districts.

  645. antibeast 说:
    @j2

    无论顿巴斯发生什么,都不会改变对这场战争的预测:乌克兰不会耗尽任何战争必需品(人员、武器、食物、资金、士气),也不会接受停火,因此俄罗斯不会赢得这场战争,并将无法保持它已经获得的基础,因为它最终会耗尽一些必不可少的东西。 这只是一个转折点何时发生的问题。

    我认为你对乌克兰在军事上战胜俄罗斯的前景过于乐观。 恕我直言,在美国-北约的持续支持下,基辅所能完成的最大工作就是军事僵局,导致停战,就像朝鲜战争一样。 这将要求俄罗斯在乌克兰东部和南部征服足够的领土,同时摧毁乌克兰西部的关键基础设施和军事资产。

    与你的观点相反,俄罗斯将永远不会耗尽武器、弹药、食品或燃料,而乌克兰已经依赖美国-北约供应线进入乌克兰西部。 但俄罗斯一直在摧毁乌克兰西部的关键基础设施和军事资产,而不是相反。 这意味着俄罗斯实际上是在以自己的方式发动“消耗战”,切断了顿巴斯前线的乌克兰军队与乌克兰西部的美国-北约供应线的联系。 此外,那些运往乌克兰西部的苏联制造的武器也不能被美国-北约取代,因为这些军事装备是苏联制造的。 相比之下,俄罗斯可以轻松地用更新的 T-72 MBT 或最新的 T-90 Armatas 替换其旧的 T-14 MBT。

    最后,到目前为止,俄罗斯一直在用儿童手套对待乌克兰东部和南部。 一旦俄罗斯决定对新武装的乌克兰西部发动“令人震惊和敬畏”式的战争,这种战争可能会改变,使用温压武器的“焦土”战术,通过高超音速导弹发射。

    要非常小心你想要的东西,因为你可能会在乌克兰西部得到你不想要的东西。

    • 同意: Commentator Mike, Iris
    • 回复: @j2
  646. what he is saying is very simple.

    For whatever reasons that the Russians are unwilling or unable to interdict the deliveries of the weapons into Ukraine in the 10s of billions of dollars worth. Russian forces are going to have a real hard time this summer. Easy victory just might become a bloody one. Could even cause it’s eventual defeat.

    I agree, even though my opinion isn’t worth much compare to Mr. Ritter.

  647. Avery 说:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    {Or the full ?elensky, in stilletos, across your back?}

    ROFL。

  648. Avery 说:
    @Iris

    {– that Crimea is gone forever and cannot [能够] be brought back only through negotiations and good will from Russia.}

    There is no scenario whereby Russia would give Crimea to Ukraine.
    Either through negotiation or good will, or for $1 Trillion, or anything else.

    给予 Crimea to a (potentially) hostile power would be an existential threat to Russia.
    If Russia were to give — not “return”, not “give back” — to Ukraine, Russia would lose control of the Black Sea. In time, all of Russia’s Black Sea coast would be under threat by hostile powers (read NATO, Turkey,…..)

    And then its interior , all the way to Moscow, would be under threat of hostiles.
    Like when Tatars and Turks were squatting there.

    • 回复: @John Johnson
    , @Iris
  649. @Lurker

    There appears to be a pile of galvanized sheeting dumped in at the left. Scrap pile!

    So you are saying that the Ukrainians towed a bunch of Russian vehicles into the river?

    And again I refer to their positioning. Two of them are even stacked on top of each other!

    Yes that is what heavy artillery can do.

    Flip vehicles over like soda cans.

    Also there seems no logical reason for them to be arranged like that during combat.

    They tried to cross as a group and that is when the Ukrainians fired their heavy guns.

    If the Russian tanks are hit hard enough they jack in the box which means their magazine explodes and their turret pops off. The explosion is large enough to set off nearby vehicles.

    • 回复: @Avery
  650. 里特:“……除非普京动员或调动部队,否则这些部队不会被取代。”

    迪米特里·奥尔洛夫表示,俄罗斯正在将其所有专业武装部队人员骑车进出冲突。 这很有意义,因为长期没有战争的军队会忘记如何作战,而俄罗斯最近很少发生冲突。

    奥尔洛夫表示,俄罗斯人员的流血行动可能会在仲夏之前完成。

  651. Avery 说:
    @John Johnson

    [Top General Claims VIDEO GAME CLIP Is Ukraine War Footage]

  652. @Avery

    Giving Crimea to a (potentially) hostile power would be an existential threat to Russia.
    If Russia were to give — not “return”, not “give back” — to Ukraine, Russia would lose control of the Black Sea. In time, all of Russia’s Black Sea coast would be under threat by hostile powers (read NATO, Turkey,…..)

    It would be returning Crimea.

    In 1994 they agreed to recognize the autonomy of Ukraine and that included Crimea. Here is a link to the actual treaty:
    https://treaties.un.org/Pages/showDetails.aspx?objid=0800000280401fbb

    They have no historical claim anymore than the Turks and they held it before the Russians.

    The Turks actually held it longer. Turkey in fact believes it belongs to Ukraine:
    https://www.aa.com.tr/en/turkey/turkey-s-position-on-crimea-is-clear-official/2398163

    Russia can trade without a Black sea port. They are not under threat hostile powers. That is ridiculous.

    Russia is the world’s largest country. They don’t need to take Ukraine. Putin should figure out their negative birth rate instead of sending another 50k soldiers to their graves.

    • 回复: @Avery
  653. Lurker 说:
    @j2

    Ironically elsewhere I have hasbarats explaining to me how well trained the Ukrainian conscript army is vs the Russian force which appears to be mostly composed of professionals who not professionals because: reasons.

    While other hasbarats explain that the all-volunteer Ukrainian army is besting the conscripted, press ganged Russians.

    • 回复: @j2
  654. j2 说:
    @antibeast

    “Contrary to your viewpoint, Russia will never run out of weapons, munitions,”

    您必须考虑到,俄罗斯武装部队不仅是为了像现在乌克兰那样在国外进行战争。 它们主要用于国土防御。 除非俄罗斯完全改变其防御原则并且不保卫本国(即在任何地方都看不到任何可能的外部威胁,例如北约或中国或任何其他边界),否则它无法在任何战争中使用全部力量(或者曾经,军事行动)在国外。 它通常不会超过其强度的一半。 因此,俄罗斯有 770 架可以飞行的战斗机。 其中一半是 385,但即便如此,对于乌克兰的战争来说也太多了。 可以说,俄罗斯可以在乌克兰使用300-350架战斗机(战斗机和轰炸机)。 它已经失去了 200,然后你会看到它不是那个无限的数字。 对于中程导弹,库存估计为c。 2000。俄罗斯打了2000多一点。有了坦克,那些真正能用的坦克是c。 2,800。 如果 1250 出来了,剩下的也不是无限的,它们也是国土防御所需要的。 一切都一样。

    • 回复: @Ron Unz
    , @antibeast
  655. Avery 说:
    @John Johnson

    All your BS re Crimea has been answered by many posters in many threads.
    I am not going to waste time repeating it.

    {It would be returning Crimea.}

    NOT.😊

  656. j2 说:
    @Lurker

    “Ironically elsewhere I have hasbarats explaining to me how well trained the Ukrainian conscript army is vs the Russian force which appears to be mostly composed of professionals who not professionals because: reasons.

    While other hasbarats explain that the all-volunteer Ukrainian army is besting the conscripted, press ganged Russians.”

    Either your English or your thinking is very poor, because what you write makes no logical sense. But being far too kind to obvious hasbaras/trolls like you, I will try to explain to you what I think you might be wondering here in this singularly messy piece of text from you.

    Conscript army training aims to teaching one thing only: obey and do not argue. (Women hardly ever can do this, they do finally obey if you insist, but they always argue. This is why army is mainly for men.) That, i.e., obey, fulfill the command, combined with competent officers, who usually are staff or at least trained/experienced, a conscript army can do certain things quite well. In a recent NATO exercise a Finnish conscript batallion defeated American marines who made a landing and ended up totally destroyed, so underestimating a conscript army may well be an error. A conscript army is not better trained than a professional army, it does things it can do, so it does things differently. But it is larger and that’s why it is finally stronger.

    • 哈哈: Spanky
    • 回复: @Lurker
  657. j2 说:
    @Iris

    “So in summary, Zelensky is:
    – recognising that the Ukrainian forces have lost control of so much of national territory that simply returning to the status quo pre-24 February, where the Donbass was already long-controlled by Russian-speaking separatists, would be considered a “victory”.
    – that Crimea is gone forever and cannot be brought back only through negotiations and good will from Russia.”

    Yes, returning to the state where everything was in 24. Feb. 2022 would certainly be counted as Ukraine victory. You do not maybe understand that Russia is a very powerful country in the military ranking while Ukraine is not. Therefore not losing would certainly be a victory for Ukraine, so called “defense victory”. They would have defeated Russia in reaching the operational objectives. As a result many Russian generals would lose their job, because for Putin that would be a clear defeat.

  658. Ron Unz 说:
    @j2

    Thus, Russia has 770 fighter jets that do fly. Half of it is 385, but even that is too much to the war in Ukraine. We can say that Russia can use 300-350 fighter jets (fighters and bombers) in Ukraine. It it has lost 200, then you see that it is not that infinite number.

    I haven’t been following the details of the Russia-Ukraine war, but the claim that the Russians have lost 200 fighter jets or bombers seems awfully high to me. Do you have any solid source?

    • 回复: @j2
  659. antibeast 说:
    @j2

    你必须考虑到,俄罗斯武装力量不仅仅是为了像现在在乌克兰那样的海外战争。 他们主要用于国土防御。 除非俄罗斯完全改变其防御原则并且不保卫本国(即在任何地方都看不到任何可能的外部威胁,例如北约或中国或任何其他边界),否则它无法在任何战争中使用其全部力量(或者是,军事行动)在国外。 因此,俄罗斯有 770 架可以飞行的战斗机。 其中一半是385,但即便如此,对于乌克兰战争来说也太多了。 可以说,俄罗斯在乌克兰可以使用300-350架战斗机(战斗机和轰炸机)。 如果它失去了200,那么你会发现它不是那个无限的数字。 对于中程导弹,库存估计为c。 2000年。俄罗斯已经射击了2000多辆。有了坦克,真正可以使用的坦克有c。 2,800。 如果1250人被淘汰,剩下的数量也不是无限的,而且他们也是国土防御所需要的。

    俄罗斯武装部队通过导弹袭击对叙利亚进行了长达数年的空袭! 俄罗斯人在乌克兰根本没有这样做,他们依靠坦克营、集结的火炮和地面部队来“解放”乌克兰东部和南部。 这就是为什么俄罗斯在面对土耳其制造的Bayraktar TB72武装无人机等21世纪武器时遭受惨重损失,尤其是其过时的T-2主战坦克。 迄今为止,俄罗斯仅进行了零星的导弹袭击,旨在摧毁关键基础设施和军事资产,主要是在乌克兰西部。

    我的意思是,你从哪里得到俄罗斯将耗尽武器、导弹和弹药的想法? 除了库存之外,俄罗斯还拥有自己的军工联合体,可以从其最亲密的盟友中国采购所需的零部件和子系统,以补充其可以持续数年的武器库存,正如其叙利亚空袭行动所证明的那样。 安德烈·马尔蒂亚诺夫表示,俄罗斯人甚至没有将这次 SMO 视为任何类型的战争,而是将其视为“联合武装警察行动”。

    可以肯定的是,俄罗斯人在三月份的第一个月的战略军事行动中犯了一些作战和战术错误,但自四月份以来改变了战术。 我不需要重述这些错误,但我只想说乌克兰已经证明过时的 T-72 主战坦克的辉煌时代早已一去不复返了。 这一点在纳戈尔诺-卡拉巴赫战争中首次得到证明,当时阿塞拜疆部署了 Bayraktar TB2 武装无人机,在几周内成功摧毁了数百辆亚美尼亚 T-72 主战坦克。 对于俄罗斯来说,失去数百甚至数千辆过时的 T-72 主战坦克在未来也不会产生太大影响,因为无论如何都需要用配备反无人机/反坦克/反导弹的最新 T-14 阿玛塔坦克进行替换导弹防御系统。 对于乌克兰来说,其美国-北约盟国可以提供更多仍掌握在前苏联国家手中的T-72主战坦克。 但一旦这些旧苏制武器库存耗尽,乌克兰就倒霉了。

    你的预测与我的完全相反:问题不是一旦乌克兰的食品、燃料、武器和弹药供应耗尽,而是乌克兰何时会失败。

    • 回复: @Iris
    , @j2
  660. Avery 说:

    {Do you have any solid source?}

    Yes: US General Barry R McCaffrey. As solid a source as one can get.

    [Top General Claims VIDEO GAME CLIP Is Ukraine War Footage]

  661. j2 说:
    @Ron Unz

    The figure is from Ukraine, from ukrniform, https://www.ukrinform.net/
    but you can estimate the number by simple logic.

    1) In the beginning of the war Russia had 300 fighter jets in the area that they could be used in Ukraine. This number, 300, is usually taken by Western analysts as the number of fighter jets that Russia used in Ukraine. Indeed, the number is large enough and there was no need to move planes from a far away place for this special operation. Some analysts even suggested that Russia only used 89 fighter jest in the beginning, but this is certainly too low. The figure 300 is generally accepted. let us take that number.

    2) Russia has lost control of Ukraine airspace. It only has control of airspace close to the areas that it currently occupies. If this were not the case, then it would be impossible that Ukraine planes are flying and that Western weapons are getting to the front in Eastern Ukraine. We know that Ukraine planes are flying as they are occasionally shot down. We also know that Western weapons arrive to the front as there are videos with M777 howizers in Eastern Ukraine, and they were used in Kharkiv. Thus, we can say with certainty: Russia does not have air control over most of Ukraine.

    3) Ukraine had 98 fighter jets in the beginning. After the initial strategic strike 56 planes survived, then the number dropped to 48. Ukraine got 6 Mig-29s in spare parts from then USA and some number (maybe c. 20) Mig-21s from Romania. We can conclude that Ukraine has less than 100 fighter jets.

    4) Ukraine still has some, but not much, long range ground-to-air missiles (S-300, BUK), but not much. The only reason why Russia does not take air control is that the number of fighter jets that Russia has is not much larger than the number of fighter jets that Ukraine has. As Ukraine has less than 100, then Russia does not have much more than 100.

    5) Initially Russia had 300. Now it has a bit over 100. Thus, c. 200 fighter jets have been lost.

    This is naturally only a simple deduction and need not be true, but ask yourself, if Russia has something close to 300 fighter jets, then why does it not take complete air control and stop weapon transports.

    About ukrinform numbers of lost Russian equipment. There is one small piece of information that seems to indicate that Ukraine numbers may not be at all so badly off. A special type of T-80 tank was used only in one Russian brigade. Data of the losses of this brigade was obtained and they lost c. 80 tanks since the beginning of the war to the time the report was made. In this same time oryx page

    https://www.oryxspioenkop.com/2022/02/attack-on-europe-documenting-equipment.html

    announced that Russians lost 40 this type of tanks. This indicates that oryx data has about half of the losses. Oryx data now has about half (694) of the tank losses which ukrinform gives (1250), so it is quite possible that ukrinform data is rather close to the real figures.

    Estimating losses from very insufficient data is difficult. I have done these estimations and have certain confidence that I have roughly the correct view. You are quite free to criticize these numbers, but it may well be that I may have a bit more military knowledge out of us two.

    It is also possible to track the 200 lost Russian fighter jets differently (actually the 200 is all fixed wind planes, also transport planes, but mostly the planes used by Russians are close air support bombers and multirole fighters). In ukrinform there are the official announcements when a plane is shot down, like here
    https://www.ukrinform.net/rubric-ato/3489412-lviv-paratroopers-shoot-down-russian-su25-plane.html

    These announcements are also in the live map
    https://liveuamap.com/

    The map shows where the shooting down is supposed to have happened, and the places are quite reasonable and the number of shot planes agrees well with Russian attack activity. It is one, two or zero planes per day, mostly zero at this stage since Russian planes mainly fire missiles from Russian airspace without coming to Ukrainian air space. Certainly due to MANPADs.

    Summing the announcements does give the ukrinform figure.

    Hope this helps you. Your site seems to be infested with pro-Russian trolls. Is this on purpose?

    • 回复: @j2
    , @Truth Vigilante
    , @Spanky
  662. j2 说:
    @j2

    “There is one small piece of information that seems to indicate that Ukraine numbers may not be at all so badly off. A special type of T-80 tank was used only in one Russian brigade. Data of the losses of this brigade was obtained and they lost c. 80 tanks since the beginning of the war to the time the report was made. In this same time oryx page announced that Russians lost 40 this type of tanks. ”

    The details are in a ResearchGate discussions, I will not look for it now for you, search for Ukraine war discussions in ResearchGate if interested in this verification how good are oryx estimates. My numbers are never just shaken from a sleeve. But about references, I always say: search and check yourself, so you believe. I simply give a hint that you would know what you may find, but I never try to convince anybody of anything as it is impossible, at least in this site.

    • 回复: @V. K. Ovelund
  663. Iris 说:
    @antibeast

    迄今为止,俄罗斯仅进行了零星的导弹袭击,旨在摧毁关键基础设施和军事资产,主要是在乌克兰西部。

    And Russia did so in the perhaps naïve, but not ever-lasting mindset that her special operation’s strategy was to also avoid unnecessary Ukrainian 军事 损失。

    事实上,俄罗斯小心翼翼地避免袭击陆军军营、军事居住区和其他非活跃军事目标,国防部每天都会记录其在乌克兰的成功行动。

    • 回复: @j2
  664. Iris 说:
    @Avery

    There is no scenario whereby Russia would give Crimea to Ukraine.

    Completely agree. I was merely reporting the Zelensky half-truths and outright lies he cooks up for the gullible locals.

    Not only Russia will never “give back” Crimea, but it is also becoming increasingly obvious that she has no choice but to take control of all of Southern Ukraine, including the strategic port of Odessa, and make junction with the Russian-leaning separatist region of Transnistria, which has de facto been independent since 1992.

    Incorporating Transnistria the same way as Donbass very much makes sense, further enhances Russia’s security and further justifies the sacrifices currently made by Russians.

    Also, Russia needs a “sanitary corridor” towards Western Europe through Transnistria. Before WWII, such function was performed by the Baltic states under the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact.

    What will remain of dismantled Ukraine will not only lose Crimea and Mariupol, but will also most likely lose any access to the Black Sea and become landlocked.

    Things could have been different but Zelensky, by applying NATO’s extremist instructions, has left no choice to Russia; this was the plan all along.

    Russia is awaking to the fact that Ukraine is not just “one” battle, but a life-or-death struggle with the US hegemon, which will force her much further out of the initial framework she intended for her “special operation”.

    NATO has decided that Russia 德伦达, and Russia is only realising this by the day and adjusting accordingly.

    • 同意: Avery, nokangaroos
    • 回复: @John Johnson
  665. @Iris

    Not only Russia will never “give back” Crimea,

    You mean Putin will never give back Crimea.

    Putin won’t make it to the end of the year and we don’t know what the next leader will do about Crimea.

    It may be given back as a token of peace by a future Russian leader. Or they may allow a real vote instead of a referendum. We really don’t know. Putin is most likely sick and is trying to take what he can while he can still play war games as a Tsar. The next leader may not care about Crimea.

    but it is also becoming increasingly obvious that she has no choice but to take control of all of Southern Ukraine

    Incorporating Transnistria the same way as Donbass very much makes sense, further enhances Russia’s security and further justifies the sacrifices currently made by Russians.

    How exactly? Be specific of how Russian security is any different in the context of Mach 5 missiles that are in Germany.

    War with NATO means the world blows up. Moving Russia’s border East doesn’t change that.

    FYI the little boots dictator has since moved away from that explanation. Now he is claiming that Donbass was the reason for the war the whole time. But unlike Russia we have an open internet and an archive of his inconsistent statements.

    Things could have been different but Zelensky, by applying NATO’s extremist instructions

    Extremist instructions? What are you talking about? They received military training from NATO just as they have received military training from other countries. They have been preparing for an invasion from Russia because that was the most likely aggressor. Even without NATO they would have prepared for an invasion from the east. The Ukrainians don’t want to live under a Russian dictatorship. They already did that under the USSR and along with Poland and the Baltic nations they aren’t interested in taking orders from Moscow again.

    • 巨魔: Commentator Mike, gatobart
  666. @j2

    In response to the reasonable request from Ron Unz that you show proof that Russia has lost 200 fighter jets, Joo-Too (aka j2) responded thus:

    The only reason why Russia does not take air control is that the number of fighter jets that Russia has is not much larger than the number of fighter jets that Ukraine has.
    As Ukraine has less than 100, then Russia does not have much more than 100.

    Initially Russia had 300. Now it has a bit over 100. Thus, c. 200 fighter jets have been lost

    .

    That is the most juvenile B.S explanation I have heard in aid of the Judeo-Fascist pro-Ukraine propaganda campaign.

    ‘j2’, you’ve stooped to making stuff up on the fly, like your fellow small hat comrade John Johnson. That’s how desperate you are to concoct a positive spin out of anything in light of the perilous situation your beloved Zionist Ukrainians are now faced with.

    If the Russians have lost more than a small fraction of the 200 fighters you claim in this conflict, I’d be very surprised.

    • 同意: Spanky
  667. The American M777 has been hyped as a miracle weapon that would turn the tide of the war. It is light and accurate, but far from being a game changer as towed artillery is quite vulnerable. After firing, the self propelled and armoured guns are moving rapidly to avoid the counter-battery fire, the towed ones need more time to be repositioned. Russians do not have attack drones, but they used a lot of observation drones to locate and target the artillery fire. Without any armor protection the M777 and its crew are likely to be disabled by a close enough hit.

    The max range for Russian Koalitsiya armored self propelled 152 mm is about 43 miles, more than the M777, in addition it can fire much faster, up to 16 rounds per minute including the Krasnopol laser guided round. It is likely that most of the M777s will be taken out by this one..The older Russian guns of 203 mm also can mach M777’s range with certain ammo…

    The M777 has been hit by the Russian kamikaze Kub BLA, there are videos on 5/18 posted by RDM, not sure how many of those are available

    Russians are averaging about 300 air sorties daily, mostly on Donbas. The M777 are vulnerable to the high altitude guided bombs, laser or GLONAS. There have been rumors in the West that those are running in short supply, I am kinda skeptic to the ‘ experts ‘ analysis, we also heard from them that Russians are running out of fuel and ammo 2 weeks after the invasion…

    The Alligators seems to be quite active also. The attack helis are using flares anti manpads non stop in the vulnerable areas as the Su25 in low fly missions ( tons of videos on Telegram using guided and unguided ammo)
    I have not seen lately much evidence that Ukraine was able to shut down many of those.

    A favorite spin of the ‘experts’ is the idea that the Russian offensive in Dombas is stalled..by contrary is speeding up. The goal seems to be minimal Russian losses thus avoid direct assaults on the fortified Ukr positions. The Javelins are quite useless against thermobaric ammo, if one side has a serious superiority in heavy guns it will use it…

    The Ukraine stats are beyond unreliable, some are hilarious, ghost of Kiev, really ? Some folks here and elsewhere are speculating on stuff without much evidence…. One thing that is clear, Russians are using only quite a limited number of their military resources and the reasons are not known . Maybe they are holding the reserves for a possible larger conflict with NATO….

    • 回复: @John Johnson
  668. @Wizard of Oz

    Just call it a fylfot if anyone complains. Or perhaps gammadion to appear posh and learned. In India you can buy Swastik toiletries, always a hit with guests and visitors using the facilities. I see that the left-leaning symbol is known as sauwastika in India and is associated with tantric aspects of Kali worship. Left-leaning, tantra and Kali-right up your garden-path I’d say. Time for another tat, I’d say.

  669. Spanky 说:
    @j2

    …the claim that the Russians have lost 200 fighter jets or bombers seems awfully high to me. Do you have any solid source? —罗恩·恩兹(Ron Unz)

    The figure is from Ukraine, from ukrniform… — j2

    The Ghost of Kiev rides again! Between this and your million-man conscript army fantasy, one can only wonder when the Ukro siege of Moscow will begin.

  670. j2 说:
    @antibeast

    “I mean where do you get the idea that Russia will run out of weapons, missiles and munitions? In addition to its inventory, Russia has its own military-industrial complex, which can procure needed parts, components and subsystems from its closest ally, China, to replenish its stockpile of weapons which could last several years, as proven in its Syrian Air Campaign. The Russians are not even treating this SMO as any kind of war but as a ‘combined arms police operation’, according to Andrei Martyanov.”

    俄罗斯已经面临必要资源耗尽的问题。 我给出一个简短的清单。

    1.俄罗斯缺乏智能炸弹,因此使用哑弹。 其结果是,为了支持地面部队,必须使用现代轰炸机进行近距离空中支援,而这些飞机很容易受到便携式防空系统的攻击,这也是战斗机损失惨重的原因。 在叙利亚,俄罗斯一直使用高空精确弹药,而对手的便携式防空系统并不多。 西方分析人士长期以来一直怀疑俄罗斯智能炸弹库存短缺,事实证明确实如此。

    2.俄罗斯已经用完了自己的合同兵,必须使用代理士兵:车臣人、分裂分子等来填补空缺。

    3.俄罗斯缺乏桥接设备。 这是众所周知的,乌克兰已经成功摧毁了几座浮桥。

    4.俄罗斯缺乏火炮瞄准无人机。 乌克兰使用的便携式防空导弹尤其能有效击落俄罗斯无人机。

    • 回复: @antibeast
  671. j2 说:
    @Iris

    “And Russia did so in the perhaps naïve, but not ever-lasting mindset that her special operation’s strategy was to also avoid unnecessary Ukrainian military losses.

    It is a fact that Russia, which MOD provides a daily record of its successful actions in Ukraine, targets has carefully avoided striking Army barracks, military living settlements and other non-active military targets.”

    Hi Iris. Russia made a strategic strike in the beginning in which they targeted Ukrainian military infrastructure as well as they could. It destroyed about 40%, which is typical, good would have been 60%. The attack in Donbass has been going on for a month. Russian gains have been very small and losses high. A successful attack means that you have large gains in this time. They have failed to reach operation objectives meaning that so far they have failed. Russians have bombarded cities with missiles and artillery as much as they have been able to. It has not had the desired effect, but it has caused much destruction to civilian buildings and it also has caused civilian deaths. In the very beginning Russia did try to avoid civilian deaths, while trying to destroy military infrastructure. But from the time when Putin told to use missiles, this changed.

    • 回复: @Iris
  672. antibeast 说:
    @j2

    俄罗斯缺乏智能炸弹,因此使用哑弹。 其结果是,为了支持地面部队,必须使用现代轰炸机进行近距离空中支援,而这些飞机很容易受到便携式防空系统的攻击,这也是战斗机损失惨重的原因。 在叙利亚,俄罗斯一直使用高空精确弹药,而对手的便携式防空系统并不多。 西方分析人士长期以来一直怀疑俄罗斯智能炸弹库存短缺,事实证明确实如此。

    只不过俄罗斯没有像在叙利亚那样对乌克兰进行持续的空袭。 在叙利亚七年的战争中,来自所有国家的各种类型的飞机(包括无人机)总共损失了不到 150 架。

    下图显示了 2015 年至 2018 年俄罗斯在叙利亚空袭中的出动架次:

    俄罗斯在这四年里损失了 19 架飞机。 你现在又声称俄罗斯在不到三个月的时间内在乌克兰损失了 200 架飞机?

    • 回复: @j2
  673. j2 说:
    @antibeast

    在叙利亚,俄罗斯一直使用智能炸弹。 对手的防空能力远不及乌克兰在基辅的水平(他们在那里拥有相当多的S-300单位)。 它们可以飞越防空能力并将城市炸成废墟。

    在乌克兰,战略打击是基于乌克兰人不会参与的错误情报而计划的。 它基于对军事基础设施的直升机袭击。 这次基于错误前提的战略打击失败了。 然后俄罗斯尝试对它认为的重心进行地面攻击,特别是基辅,但也包括哈尔科夫等其他大城市。 这次尝试也失败了。 在这一尝试进行期间,俄罗斯并不打算将这些城市变成废墟,也没有为此目的使用轰炸机。 这个时候或许还有可能​​,但是基辅周围的防空系统是他们无法逾越的障碍。 相反,他们使用轰炸机来封闭空中支援,这就是为什么他们的便携式防空系统造成大量飞机损失的原因。 这种情况一直持续着。 结果,俄罗斯失去了乌克兰大部分领空的空中优势。

    俄罗斯没有空中优势,无法阻止西方武器向东乌克兰运输。 乌克兰正在动员一支庞大的后备军,并可以为其配备西方武器。 俄罗斯仍固守其已有的东西,并努力动员甚至来自未经训练的人的代理人力量。 俄罗斯的进展非常缓慢,成本非常高。 乌克兰可能会失去c。 顿巴斯有 50-100 人(即全部损失),主要是由于俄罗斯的炮火,而俄罗斯则损失了约 200 人。 3 人(也全部损失,死伤),因为俄罗斯一直是攻击者。 即使使用重型火炮,进攻方的损失也高于防守方。 乌克兰可以补给人员,俄罗斯在补给人员方面有明显的问题。 你只需将其推断为未来大约 4-XNUMX 周,你就可以预期乌克兰许多人会发动反攻。 请注意,为了补给人员,俄罗斯甚至不得不将士兵从叙利亚抽调到乌克兰。 它应该告诉你一些事情。

    • 回复: @antibeast
  674. Iris 说:
    @j2

    Russians have bombarded cities with missiles and artillery as much as they have been able to.

    No. As you well know, there has been much noise, and vote, and expulsion/voluntary withdrawal of Russia from the UN Human Rights Council because of the very disputed Bucha “massacre”, for which no objective evidence has been presented yet.
    If there were undisputable and proven Russian war crimes, they would have already been brought before the UN.

    I am sorry, but for the time being, the only violations and likely crimes against humanity being publicly discussed at the UN, with objective evidence provided and examined by third parties, are the US military bio-research activities in the Ukraine’s 20+ laboratories.

    A successful attack means that you have large gains in this time.

    I disagree with that too. The current events are not a war between Ukraine and Russia. The origins of this conflict go at least as far back as the collapse of the USSR and the emergence of the US as unique superpower, a status that is now being challenged militarily and economically, triggering this extreme and very dangerous policies by the American imperialist circles.

    As Russian academic Sergey Glaziev put it:

    the process of changing the world economic structures occurs once in a century and is accompanied by world wars and social revolutions

    A much interesting opinion worth reading:
    https://noshitsherlock.net/2022/03/29/events-like-this-happen-once-a-century-sergey-glazyev-on-the-breakdown-of-epochs-and-changing-ways-of-life/

    We are witnessing a major geopolitical change that, once enacted, will prove to be as important as the combined outcomes of WW1 and WW2. Except that this time, it will be achieved in much less time, five to ten years maximum. Or even just a few months in case of unfortunate nuclear strikes that will end things much quicker.

    The weeks, months, even couple of years Russia will be spending stabilising the Ukraine situation are nothing, compared to the “once-in-a-century” gigantic stakes.

    The point is not whether one supports Russia or supports NATO, but must not fail at identifying what really is at stake.
    This is much more than a police operation against a bunch of Russophobic retarded “nationalists”. What is at stake is a new organisation of the world, and it cannot, will not emerge within just weeks or months.

    • 回复: @j2
    , @mulga mumblebrain
  675. Nat X 说:

    Yt killing yt, I hope Dey both win.

  676. j2 说:

    “As you well know, there has been much noise, and vote, and expulsion/voluntary withdrawal of Russia from the UN Human Rights Council because of the very disputed Bucha “massacre”, for which no objective evidence has been presented yet.
    If there were undisputable and proven Russian war crimes, they would have already been brought before the UN. ”

    Dear Iris. I know your theory of Bucha, but do not agree with you. But the deduction in your comment is incorrect. Russia announced 19. April that it opposes an independent investigation of Bucha by the UN as a war crime. Russia also withdraw its signature for acceptance of ICC as a crime investigator for Bucha. Therefore Russia has blocked an UN investigation of war crimes in Bucha, consequently no evidence has been and cannot be presented before the UN. Besides, if the initial investigation was in April, you cannot expect that a crime investigation be ready in May. Crime case investigation takes considerably longer time, as it does investigate the alternative theories such as Ukrainians had staged the crime scene. But do not worry, it will be investigated and the results will come. Here is how NYT summarizes the present situation.

    “During a visit to Bucha and Borodianka in mid-April, the Chief Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court Karim Khan said there were “reasonable grounds to believe that crimes within the jurisdiction of the ICC” were being committed in both towns. But Khan also warned that it would be “challenging” to guarantee justice would be served in Ukraine, given Russia’s decision to withdraw its signature from the ICC statute, which gives the court jurisdiction to prosecute individuals for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, and the crime of aggression. Russia also doesn’t extradite its citizens to other countries.”

    鸢尾花写道:
    “We are witnessing a major geopolitical change that, once enacted, will prove to be as important as the combined outcomes of WW1 and WW2.”

    In this case you may well be correct. There is some bigger geopolitical game going on. I have not yet figured out what it is and the commenters in Unz are so poor that their views are best ignored. Whatever this means I will ponder later. At the moment the only thing that interests me in this war is the war itself, military issues of this war, not geopolitical or moral.

  677. j2 说:
    @Iris

    Hi Iris, maybe it interests you that the first court case sentenced a Russian soldier for shooting a civilian. He admitted having done it on command, he pleaded guilty. It is unlikely to be a case of forced confession, he does not seem to have been tortured.
    https://www.ukrinform.net/rubric-ato/3490054-ukraines-court-sentences-russian-soldier-to-life-in-prison-for-killing-a-civilian.html

    As you know, terror including killings and rapes is a common method used by several armies for a specific goal and Russia was found to have used these methods in Chechenia.

  678. antibeast 说:
    @j2

    我在你上一篇文章中唯一同意的一点是,俄罗斯人在 SMO 的第一阶段未能占领基辅和哈尔科夫。 与你的说法相反,俄罗斯人在基辅和哈尔科夫的两次围攻中失败了,因为他们没有提供近距离空中支援,这使俄罗斯坦克营和步兵部队遭受路边伏击和无人机袭击。 我同意你的观点,SMO的初始阶段依靠直升机来运输伞兵以及为坦克营和地面部队提供近距离空中支援。 一旦坦克营和步兵部队到达基辅和哈尔科夫,俄罗斯并没有像在叙利亚那样对基辅和哈尔科夫发动持续的空袭,他们出动了 39,000 架次,使用包括集束炸弹、非制导炸弹在内的各种防区外武器击中了 121,466 个目标。三年战争期间的炸弹、制导炸弹和巡航导弹。 这就是为什么我觉得你关于俄罗斯人的防区外武器即将耗尽的说法令人难以置信,因为他们几乎没有开始任何持续的空袭,而是更愿意依靠制导火炮对乌克兰西部的军事资产和关键基础设施零星地发射巡航导弹摧毁乌克兰东部和南部的敌人前线。

    乌克兰没有任何攻击俄罗斯的军事手段,而俄罗斯拥有攻击乌克兰的一切军事手段。 正如我在之前的帖子中所写,时间站在俄罗斯一边,因为它正在发动一场“消耗战”,耗尽乌克兰日益减少的食品、燃料、武器和弹药库存。 除了美国和北约的军事干预外,军事局势将继续恶化,有利于俄罗斯对抗乌克兰。 俄罗斯军队的大部分储备正是为了防范美国和北约直接军事干预的可能性。 俄罗斯仍然拥有大量防区外武器可用于应对未来的任何美国与北约军事冲突,例如温压炸弹、非制导炸弹、制导炸弹、集束炸弹、巡航导弹、弹道导弹、高超音速导弹、战术核武器和战略核武器。

    仅仅因为俄罗斯花时间“解放”而不是“摧毁”乌克兰,就认为俄罗斯会在乌克兰失败,这是一厢情愿的想法。

    • 同意: Spanky
    • 回复: @j2
  679. @Jim Anderson

    美国M777被宣传为能够扭转战争局势的奇迹武器。它轻便而准确,但远不能改变游戏规则,因为牵引火炮非常脆弱。

    没有人称其为奇迹武器。别再胡编乱造了。

    It is extremely deadly but artillery doesn’t win wars alone.

    射击后,自行火炮和装甲火炮会快速移动以躲避反炮火力,牵引火炮则需要更多时间重新定位。

    嗯,它的射程超过了俄罗斯火炮。

    是的,它在射击后必须移动或隐藏,但如果 M777 使用支持 GPS 的 Excaliber 炮弹,即使一次齐射也可以消灭一个营。它们还可以用来消灭 VIP。这种准确性将进一步打击俄罗斯军队的士气。

    We don’t know how many GPS rounds they are actually getting. I’m sure they want the Russians to assume all of them.

    乌克兰的统计数据非常不可靠,有些还很搞笑,基辅的幽灵,真的吗?

    I don’t pay much attention to stats from either side. But pushing the Russians from the outskirts of Kiev and back to Kherson was not propaganda.

    There are also plenty of videos showing Ukrainians using artillery to destroy tanks which wasn’t supposed to happen at this stage under Russian air superiority. In fact the war was supposed to be over by now.

    显然,俄罗斯人的处境并不顺利。

    • 回复: @Jim Anderson
    , @Wokechoke
  680. j2 说:
    @antibeast

    俄罗斯的中程导弹(如“伊斯坎德尔”)库存估计约为 2000 枚。他们在乌克兰发射了超过 2000 枚导弹。 我们看到的此类导弹很可能会更少。 他们发射这些导弹而不是从飞机上轰炸,因为他们失去了空中优势,而且只有哑弹,他们主要可以轰炸城市,在这种情况下,这不会产生恐怖轰炸的预期效果:目的是降低道德,但那不太可能起作用。 我们看到他们把马里乌波尔的一座城市变成了废墟,但这并没有降低道德。

    俄罗斯需要保持本国的防御能力,不仅在核武器方面,而且在常规武器方面。 因此,我们可以预期,俄罗斯在外国战争中只能使用大约一半的常规武器,比如在乌克兰。 计算俄罗斯为这场战争还剩下多少武器,必须从这个假设开始,除非俄罗斯彻底改变防御战略,只用核武器保卫祖国。 这不太可能。 因此,当你写:

    “Ukraine does not (possess) any military means of attacking Russia while Russia has all the military means to attack Ukraine. ”

    你首先应该考虑一下,当乌克兰动员并武装(用西方武器)现在正在动员的部队时,情况会怎样。

    “Syria where they launched 39,000 sorties, hitting 121,466 targets with a variety of stand-off weapons including cluster bombs, unguided bombs, guided bombs and cruise missiles during three years of warfare. ”

    俄罗斯现在每天飞行 300 架次。 由于一次出动意味着一架飞机执行一项任务,假设俄罗斯有 c。 还剩下 300 架战斗机,这意味着每架战斗机只能执行一次任务。 一次任务通常需要 2 小时。 那么,您期望这些飞机在其他时间做什么? 300 架次更适合俄罗斯有 c 的情况。 100架战斗机。 当俄罗斯使用其库存制导炸弹时,他们有哑炸弹和大约 2000 枚巡航导弹。 他们在乌克兰使用了导弹。 他们拥有哑弹,需要使用多用途战斗机作为俯冲轰炸机进行近距离空中支援。 然后,这些喷气式飞机通常会被便携式防空导弹击落。 那就是问题所在。

    “that’s why I find your claims that the Russians are running out of stand-off weapons to be incredible as they have barely started any sustained air campaign, preferring to launch cruise missiles sporadically against military assets and critical infrastructure in Western Ukraine while relying on guided artillery to destroy enemy frontlines in Eastern and Southern Ukraine.”

    那么,重新表述一下你的想法:既然俄罗斯在叙利亚使用了库存的制导炸弹,你就无法理解为什么他们在乌克兰没有这些炸弹? 他们并没有偶尔使用巡航导弹,而是尽可能多地使用现有库存。 (战术核武器也需要这些导弹,所以俄罗斯不应该在乌克兰全部使用。例如,它会将那里的伊斯坎德尔留在加里宁格勒。)现在确实是这样,俄罗斯使用火炮。 他们主要不使用火炮制导弹药。 它们向民用建筑射击,似乎具有传统火炮典型的低精度特征。 而乌克兰则从20公里外向一个地点发射精确弹药。

    “As I wrote in my previous posts, time is on the side of Russia because it is waging a ‘war of attrition’ which depletes the dwindling inventory of food, fuel, weapons and munitions of Ukraine.”

    正如你所写。 您可以推荐一些比匿名的军事专家更受人尊敬的专家。 我的观点是,如果这场战争能在今年年底前结束,那么时间对俄罗斯不利。 如果是这样,那么乌克兰已经动员并武装了 45 万人,而俄罗斯军队的规模要小得多。 乌克兰得到经济援助,虽然GDP下降XNUMX%,但还是能撑到年底。 如果这将是一场漫长的战争,那么时间对俄罗斯来说是有利的,因为它可以重建军队。 这就是为什么乌克兰不会接受停火,也不希望发生长期战争。 对于乌克兰来说,这场战争必须在今年年底结束,这意味着他们必须进行反攻,他们将在八月中旬进行反攻,但可能在那之前。

    “It’s wishful thinking to believe that Russia would lose in Ukraine just because they are taking their time to ‘liberate’ rather than to ‘destroy’ Ukraine. ”

    你以一种非常令人讨厌的方式讽刺。 俄罗斯实际上正在摧毁乌克兰的俄语地区,并声称要解放它们。 俄罗斯人因此遭到当地人的咒骂。 战前,47%的乌克兰人对俄罗斯持积极看法,26%的人认为这两个人是同一个人。 现在却不是这样了。 当俄罗斯人向敖德萨发射一枚导弹并杀死数人(其中包括一名儿童)时,就连敖德萨的亲俄市长也变成了爱国者。 3.5万乌克兰人(其中大部分是讲俄语的难民)逃往波兰而不是俄罗斯,这并非没有道理。 如今,俄罗斯在乌克兰的朋友少得多。 通过向建筑物发射导弹和炮弹并杀死他们的朋友和家人来解放人们并不是赢得民心的方法。 普京可能已经想到了这一点。 如果你稍微想一下,你也可以。

    • 同意: John Johnson
    • 哈哈: Wokechoke
  681. geokat62 说:
    @j2

    What a cohencidence… looks like j2 and 2j are on the same page.

    • 回复: @Avery
    , @John Johnson
  682. Avery 说:
    @geokat62

    {What a 科恩cidence… }

    罗夫🤣

  683. @geokat62

    The entire world is on page against this stupid war.

    “Why I radically changed my overall assessment”

    – Every Unz Putin defender by the end of the year

    Next time don’t bet on a half pint dictator that wear shoe steppers and locks down the internet.

    Not a sign of confidence in your message if you try to control the narrative through prison sentences.

    Now call me a Jew because that is all you have. Dissent = Jews when you run out of answers at Unz. Unlike Putin I don’t know any Jews and I don’t do billions of trade with Israel.

    • 回复: @geokat62
  684. geokat62 说:
    @John Johnson

    The entire world is on page against this stupid war.

    Interesting turn of phrase, JJ. This would suggest that everyone would be keen on ending the war, asap, wouldn’t it? But, one side seems to be very keen on extending it for as long as possible. And it appears you’re in favour of that side, even though you claim to “oppose” the bombing of residential areas.

    “Why I radically changed my overall assessment”

    – Every Unz Putin defender by the end of the year

    … more like every Kolomoisky defender by the end of the year.

    Next time don’t bet on a half pint dictator that wear shoe steppers and locks down the internet.

    Next time don’t bet on a Jewish Supremacist oligarch who’s obsessed with creating a Second Israel, by sponsoring duped ethno-nationalists to bomb innocent civilians.

    Dissent = Jews when you run out of answers at Unz

    No, dissent = fascists when you run out of answers at Unz.

    • 回复: @John Johnson
  685. @John Johnson

    开始阅读……M777 被西方媒体和所谓的分析师大肆宣传为“第二次到来”。对于训练有素和装备不佳的第三世界军队来说,可能是极其致命的,俄罗斯的“Koalitsya”是一种更好的武器,它的射速是其两倍以上,射程更远,防护能力比装甲自行式变种要好得多。

    不,它的射程并不超过俄罗斯枪支,除了 CNN 的宣传之外,网络上还有可靠的信息。正因为 M777 的射程较短,所以有一个名为 M777E 的新型号/原型,具有更长的枪管,旨在获得更高的射击速度。

    一旦 M777 开火,反击炮台就会识别出该地点,并用克拉斯诺波尔制导炮弹将其击落。作为替代方案,Pion 发射的 203 毫米弹药威力如此之大,以至于不需要精确的精度……

    我想我们很快就会看到 M777 在恶劣的环境中表现如何,更好的枪支和训练有素的人员正在反击,消灭贫穷的伊拉克农民并不那么困难。

    我不同意战争应该在几周内结束的想法。2014年就是这种情况,当时乌克兰军队训练和装备严重不足。据西方数据显示,乌克兰有不少于22000万名北约教官,经过8年时间和数十亿美元,乌克兰打造出了符合北约标准的核心职业军队。近代以来,第一世界军队之间并没有发生重大冲突,这绝非易事,但俄罗斯在军事资源和补给线方面仍然拥有巨大优势。

    亲乌克兰媒体/分析人士忽视的另一个事实是俄罗斯方面在人力和军事资源方面的承诺相当小。在顿巴斯,许多战斗是由分离主义民兵和俄罗斯国民警卫队而不是皇家军队进行的,他们正在花时间避免直接攻击,实际上在过去几天里事情正在加速。

    • 同意: Spanky
  686. Wokechoke 说:
    @John Johnson

    Not quite. Cluster bomb warheads can be launched at the Ukie artillery. The crews of these guns will be killed along with support vehicles and other signals troops.

    The main purpose of Excalibur warheads is to prevent collateral damage by artillery. Accuracy is great but you can launch huge barrages on an area and kill everyone in that area with Russian gear. The sky above Donets and Donbas is infested with Russian drones and surveillance now. The survival of these howitzers on the Ukie side is highly questionable. The Ukies need modern jets. The artillery won’t do the job you describe.

  687. antibeast 说:
    @j2

    你以一种非常令人讨厌的方式讽刺。 俄罗斯实际上正在摧毁乌克兰的俄语地区,并声称要解放它们。 俄罗斯人因此遭到当地人的咒骂。 战前,47%的乌克兰人对俄罗斯持积极看法,26%的人认为这两个人是同一个人。 现在却不是这样了。 当俄罗斯人向敖德萨发射一枚导弹并杀死数人(其中包括一名儿童)时,就连敖德萨的亲俄市长也变成了爱国者。 3.5万乌克兰人(其中大部分是讲俄语的难民)逃往波兰而不是俄罗斯,这并非没有道理。 如今,俄罗斯在乌克兰的朋友少得多。 通过向建筑物发射导弹和炮弹并杀死他们的朋友和家人来解放人们并不是赢得民心的方法。 普京可能已经想到了这一点。 如果你稍微想一下,你也可以。

    我认为你对乌克兰的这场战争投入了太多的感情,就像这里的许多亲俄和反俄海报一样。 我的观点是,到目前为止,俄罗斯人在这次战略军事行动中一直相当克制,他们对基辅和哈尔科夫的围攻失败就证明了这一点,他们在夷平这两座城市时显然犹豫不决。 在他们的坦克营和地面部队在三天内到达这两个城市的郊区后,俄罗斯人在一周内什么也没做,让乌克兰人在接下来的几周内诉诸游击战。 这就是导致俄罗斯车队溃败并撤回白俄罗斯和俄罗斯的原因。 这就是为什么我一直说俄罗斯人没有像在叙利亚那样在乌克兰进行持续的空袭,在叙利亚,他们在高峰时期每天进行多达 100 架次的空袭,使用制导炸弹和非制导炸弹以及巡航导弹。 鉴于俄罗斯人现在在顿巴斯前线动用了制导炮兵,在这个 SMO 的三个月内,迄今为止在乌克兰的总出动架次应该少于一千架次。 这只是俄罗斯在为期三年的叙利亚空袭期间进行的 39,000 架次飞行的一小部分,此后他们一定已经补充了炸弹或导弹的库存,这驳斥了你关于俄罗斯在乌克兰的库存肯定用完的说法。

    接下来在乌克兰南部发生的事情是对该 SMO 的政治解决,很可能以顿巴斯的陷落和敖德萨的占领而结束。 我怀疑俄罗斯是否会允许乌克兰南部与基辅或利辅有任何形式的政治联系。 这意味着在乌克兰南部建立一个独立于基辅或利辅的亲俄新俄罗斯小国。 乌克兰东部、北部和西部可能会建立两个或三个小国,分别以哈尔科夫、基辅和利沃夫为中心。 但这取决于基辅和莫斯科之间达成某种政治解决方案,为此普京需要泽林斯基的认可,如果他想活下去并在基辅保留他的同性恋变性人王国,他在这件事上没有太多选择。 另一方面,西方乌克兰人将被允许组建自己的以利沃夫为中心的小班德拉斯坦,前提是他们永远保持“非军事化”和“脱离北约”。 乌克兰东部可以选择任何一种方式,要么加入乌克兰北部的同性恋变性人基辅,要么成为乌克兰南部亲俄罗斯的新俄罗斯国家的一部分。

    这是未来几个月可能发生的情况,而不是妄想 夺回 由基辅或任何其他人领导的乌克兰西部同性恋变性“百万人”军队控制了乌克兰南部。

    • 回复: @j2
    , @Iris
  688. @j2

    First of all, you and I have had enough exchanges here in the UR so that we can safely dispense with the formality of my having to refer to you as ‘j2’.
    Instead, let’s set a relaxed tone and I will hereafter refer to you by your given name (ie: Joo-Too), as your brethren at the local synagogue address you.

    So Joo-Too, let’s begin by addressing this remark of yours:

    They shot these missiles ….. the purpose is to lower the moral, but that was unlikely to work.
    We saw them [the Russians] turn a city into rubble in Mariupol, but it did not lower the moral.

    Look, on that last point (about not lowering the ‘moral’), I have to agree with you.
    That because the Zio-backed Ukrainian fascists in Mariupol had NO MORALS to begin with – hence not likely to lower it if your starting point was zero.

    Meanwhile, assuming you meant to say ‘morale’, it’s apparent to all of us that these Judeo-fascists bunkered down in Mariupol were BURSTING WITH MORALE as they came out grovelling, white flags raised, begging for mercy as they surrendered.

    After all, history is replete with precedents of armies surrendering just as morale was peaking.

    Let’s scutinise this other remark of yours:

    since Russia used its stock of guided bombs in Syria, you cannot understand why they do not have them in Ukraine?

    Of course, the Russian participation in the Syrian campaign ended five or six years ago.

    According to Joo-Too, Russia used the ENTIRETY of its guided bomb inventory in that campaign.

    But, let’s be generous and assume that Russia had 3005 guided bombs to begin with and used 3000 of them in Syria – leaving an inventory of FIVE BOMBS remaining.

    So, the hierarchy of the Soviet Army thinks to themselves:

    ‘OK, we have FIVE bombs left. That should be enough to last us until the end of time.
    The munitions factory that manufactured them should be shut down and mothballed, never to re-open, because said FIVE BOMBS will do the trick in future military conflagrations’.

    How EFF’N stupid would someone be to believe that infantile assertion of yours ?

    You can bet London to a brick that said munitions factory replenished said inventory [and then some], in the intervening years after the Syrian war.

    Moreover, anticipating that Russia would militarily intervene in Ukraine well before the late February initiation of the SMO, you can bet that said munitions were being produced in COPIOUS quantities before that date and in the three months since.

    It’s interesting that people have brought up the German campaign to invade the Soviet Union in WWII and tried to equate the present Russian position with that of Germany. ie: implying that the longer this war goes, the more Russia will suffer from attrition.

    Joo-Too makes this asinine remark:

    My opinion is that time is against Russia provided that this war ends before the end of the year.

    Let’s get something straight: The Soviet Union, for the most part, WAS RUSSIA.

    Russia possesses the world’s LARGEST LAND MASS for a country. It has INEXHAUSTIBLE QUANTITIES of Oil, natural gas, strategic materials etc.

    We all hear about how Saudi Arabia has the world’s largest oil reserves but what most people don’t know is that Russia is the WORLD’S LARGEST OIL PRODUCER, and has been for many years.

    The fact is that the world will run out of energy long before Russia does.
    This Zio initiated proxy war in Ukraine has been responsible for a through-the-roof escalation in world gas and oil prices.
    With every day that goes by, the Russians REAP A COLOSSAL BOOTY – extracted mostly from U.S aligned vassals, who are being impoverished at a geometric rate.

    Russia makes a NET GAIN with every day this war progresses.

    Make no mistake: THE LONGER THIS WAR DRAGS ON, the WEAKER the U.S and it’s vassals become.

    Bottom Line: In the Germany Vs the Soviet Union comparison to WWII, present day Russia IS the Soviet Union [unsurprisingly].

    But the Ukrainian/NATO/Judeo triumvirate is NO GERMAN WEHRMACHT.
    After the debacles in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere, the MORALE of U.S ground forces is shot to bits.
    U.S soldiers and soldiers of it’s NATO vassals have no stomach for fighting a war on behalf of Judeo hegemony.

    When push come to shove, Anglo-Zionist/NATO military ground forces will fold like a cheap napkin when confronted with the Russians – much like the Ukrainians now are as they get pummelled into the turf.

    • 回复: @j2
  689. j2 说:
    @antibeast

    “Methinks you’re too emotionally invested in this war in Ukraine, just like a lot of the pro-Russian and anti-Russian posters here.”

    我不是。 对我来说,乌克兰人是小俄罗斯人(马洛俄罗斯人),俄罗斯人是大俄罗斯人(莫斯科人)。 两个俄罗斯人互相打斗。 然而,在国际关系中,俄罗斯是侵略者,乌克兰是保卫自己的国家。 我对这场战争的兴趣只是想看看领土防御如何对抗俄罗斯。 但你显然是亲俄罗斯的,在情感上参与其中,并试图捍卫俄罗斯的谎言。

    现在,让我们回顾一下您的论点。 所以,你注意到俄罗斯并没有将基辅和哈尔科夫夷为平地。 他们实际上无法在基辅做到这一点,因为基辅周围有相当好的防空系统。 他们为什么不把哈尔科夫夷为平地? 他们确实用导弹和大炮轰炸了它,但俄罗斯人到底为什么要试图将一座俄语城市夷为平地呢? 他们的目标是占领基辅和哈尔科夫,但这需要能够用两个包围圈包围城市,外圈可以阻挡乌克兰军队,内圈可以对城市发动风暴。 如果你是军人,你就会明白这是攻占这座城市的唯一方法。 他们连一环都未能包围其中任何一座城市。 俄罗斯根本不关心叙利亚的城市,但它想占领哈尔科夫,并通过占领基辅来迫使基辅投降。 它本可以试图将基辅夷为平地,但由于防空系统的原因,这是不可能的。 它不想将哈尔科夫夷为平地,因为它希望将哈尔科夫纳入新俄罗斯,但后来它确实轰炸了哈尔科夫。 所以,你的这个论点是错误的。

    “the Russians did exactly NOTHING for a week, allowing the Ukrainians to resort to guerrilla warfare in the following weeks.”
    正是因为他们的补给线被破坏了。 乌克兰人炸毁了通往基辅的桥梁,因此很长的运输车卡在了另一边。 此外,乌克兰炸毁了两列燃料列车,因此俄罗斯军队没有天然气。 没有汽油,他们无法移动,然后他们也耗尽了食物和弹药。 乌克兰提前一周告知此事,结果就实现了:在乌克兰告知俄军将在一周内断粮两周后,在乌克兰成功袭击布恰后,俄罗斯宣布决定撤军。 因此,他们的补给线确实被切断了。 这充分解释了为什么他们什么也不做。 空袭无法解决这个问题,因此空袭没有任何意义。

    “Given that the Russians have now resorted to guided artillery in the Donbass front, the total number of sorties so far in Ukraine should be less than a thousand over a three-month period in this SMO. That’s a fraction of the 39,000 sorties conducted by the Russians during the three-year Syrian Air Campaign, after which they must have replenished their inventory of bombs or missiles since then, debunking your claims that the Russians must be running out of stock in Ukraine.”

    事实是俄罗斯没有智能炸弹。 原因是2014年后的制裁:他们需要得不到的零部件。 请注意,如今俄罗斯无法制造更多 T-14 坦克,因为制裁阻止他们获得所需的零部件。 技术制裁并不是废话。 它们是苏联技术如此落后的主要原因。

    “What happens next in Southern Ukraine is a political settlement”
    你和任何人一样有权利做出预测。 我的预测是,乌克兰将用它现在从西方获得的武器动员军队发动反攻,然后我们看看情况如何。 但这是未来,你无法知道未来,我也无法知道。争论我们都不知道的事情是徒劳的。

    只是为了结束与您的讨论。 你的军事知识太薄弱,无法以明智的方式参与这样的讨论。 这里的评论者中只有 peterAUS 拥有足够的知识来进行讨论,而您显然没有。 我将停止与您的讨论,您必须了解更多信息才能有意义。

  690. Fr. John 说:
    @meamjojo

    你有没有想过切腹并与你的撒旦主人一起下地狱?

  691. j2 说:
    @Truth Vigilante

    “let’s set a relaxed tone and I will hereafter refer to you by your given name (ie: Joo-Too), as your brethren at the local synagogue address you.”

    Several years ago I followed the Unz Review. There were similar commenters like you are, similar rudeness, low intelli9gence and zero knowledge. They were hasbara trolls. I think is is correct to assume that you are one of them, only this time you have got a different mission: now you are pro-Putin troll.

    “But, let’s be generous and assume that Russia had 3005 guided bombs to begin with and used 3000 of them in Syria – leaving an inventory of FIVE BOMBS remaining.”

    I am sure Russia had some smart bombs left. It may even have quite a pile of them, but reserved for home land defense. It is also very possible that in the first stare of the war Russia used some smart bombs. But when a Russian bomber fell close to Mariupol, it was filled with dumb bombs. That is when Western analysts concluded that Russia must be short of smart bombs.

    You give the argument that Russian participation into Syrian war ended five or six years ago (which is not true, they just pulled some troops from Syria to fight in Ukraine) and probably imply that since that time Russia could have built more smart bombs. But you forget that since 2014 Russia has been under sanctions and these sanctions make it impossible to get necessary components for these smart bombs.

    “implying that the longer this war goes, the more Russia will suffer from attrition.”

    Attrition is a general world meaning running out of something. A country might indeed run out of fuel or food or even land to withdraw. Russia will not run out of any of these. It basically runs out of ideas how to win this war. This Donbas offensive was about the last plan, though Western analysts still expect that Russia will try another time to Kiev with three armies from the North in early June. But Russia will also run out of something essential. It may run out of men, as it will not do general mobilization, it does have a shortage of men. It probably will run out of cruise missiles (that is, it will not shoot all of them, so some remain, but cannot used as many of them as earlier). It seems to run out of artillery drones since though Russian industry is making drones, they are shot down faster than new ones are made. But finally, this is not an attrition war. Ukraine gets a million men army equipped with Western weapons and it simply pushes Russian troops out. Crime and separatist areas will be left as they are in this offensive. Ukraine tries to finish this war by the end of the year and the situation with Crime and separatist areas will be negotiated. For instance, Russia could buy Crime from Ukraine. That probably would be acceptable for Ukraine.

    I am a bit tired of discussing with you. You do not present any interesting arguments, instead you continue with this ridiculous Joo-Too and Jews. So, let us say that until you grow up and smarter, I will not care to discuss with you. It is total waste of time.

  692. Iris 说:
    @antibeast

    这就是未来几个月可能发生的情况,而不是乌克兰南部幻想的收复失地运动

    Thanks for your comment on what will become of the Ukraine’s territory. I completely agree and would like to add the following, which further shows how Ukraine is being cynically sacrificed by her “friends”.

    Information was leaked a month ago that Poland was actively discussing with the Biden administration modalities to enter Western Poland, using “peacekeeping” military units and under the excuse of protecting it against “Russian invasion”.
    This would be done without NATO mandate, but with the participation of a few fig-leaf “willing states” 波兰正在积极联系。

    The so-called Polish “peace-keeping” contingents will gradually take over from Ukraine’s National Guard, as it gets sucked into to the East, and will take control of the territory.
    随着乌克兰民族主义者被俄罗斯军队摧毁并在政治上被削弱,波兰政府将寻求更多可塑性和友好的乌克兰精英代表入驻基辅。

    In fact, we are talking about an attempt to repeat the historic “deal” for Poland after the First World War, when the collective West, represented by the Entente, recognized Warsaw’s right to first occupy part of Ukraine to protect the population from the “Bolshevik threat”, and then the inclusion of these territories in composition of the Polish state. The subsequent events became a clear illustration of the colonial order and forced Polonization as the main methods of building “Great Poland.”

    https://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1310096/pg1

    This scenario of Ukraine being dismembered by her “friends” was public asserted today by Lukashenko, Belarus’ president:

    波兰和北约关注乌克兰西部
    白俄罗斯总统声称,外部势力正在密谋接管乌克兰西部和白俄罗斯。

    “政客们正在采取措施肢解乌克兰。 我们担心他们,波兰人和北约成员国,已经准备好出来,以这种方式‘提供帮助’,像1939年之前一样,夺走乌克兰西部,”白俄罗斯总统说。
    In his opinion, the West has “a similar strategy” when it comes to Western Belarus. He didn’t offer evidence to back up the assertion.

    这种情况听起来是不可能的吗? 或者,相反, 这是否可以解释为什么波兰成为少数几个最狂热、最愤怒的战争国家之一?

  693. Mitar 说:
    @Richard Steven Hack

    Yes, it’s kinda weird that he made such a sharp U-turn, in some other Blogs/Sites he appeared even more extreme on that recently…

  694. Mitar 说:
    @anon

    Very good comment, obviously Scott has a multi-layered dependent connection with the Company, so everything he wrote could be much more coded and painted than we would ever assume. The Spoons of Salt are necessary.

  695. @j2

    嘿。

    I simply give a hint that you would know what you may find, but I never try to convince anybody of anything as it is impossible, at least in this site.

    Well, you have shifted my view a little, at any rate.

  696. @geokat62

    Interesting turn of phrase, JJ. This would suggest that everyone would be keen on ending the war, asap, wouldn’t it? But, one side seems to be very keen on extending it for as long as possible.

    Yes that side is Putin. He could end the war with a single command and yet continues to extend it.

    Next time don’t bet on a Jewish Supremacist oligarch who’s obsessed with creating a Second Israel, by sponsoring duped ethno-nationalists to bomb innocent civilians.

    I support the Ukrainian people and really don’t care about their president. Unlike Putin he has a term limit.

    Not sure what you mean by Second Israel. Ukraine has a tiny Jewish population and under Zelensky has been criticized by the West for not taking in Muslim immigrants.
    https://www.infomigrants.net/en/post/36498/will-ukraine-take-in-migrants-from-belaruspoland-border

    Meanwhile Germany has taken in over a million Muslims thanks to Merkel.

    But do go on about how I must be supporting Israel by being against a dictator that bombs residential areas. You get on your knees for a dictator that keeps Israel humming along by selling them oil.

    Oh and here is a pic of your hero:
    What a cute hat. Wonder if it matches his height enhancing shoes.

    • 回复: @geokat62
  697. @Iris

    Glaziev is wrong. Changes like this have NEVER occurred before in human history. No other Empire has ever been as dominant and blood-thirsty as the USA, with its ambition to control the entire planet forever.
    The weapons of destruction this time are annihilatory, and never before in human history have the planet’s environmental life-support systems been driven into collapse. The End Times lunatics are driving Western policies, and drooling in anticipation.

  698. @Wizard of Oz

    The plan is to vivisect Russia as they did with the Soviet Union. The predator parasites of the ‘Free World’ move in, and the various statelets hacked out of the corpse are looted. The Russian mini-state that remains is headed by a New Yeltsin, a Quisling traitor (say Navalny for laughs)or a ?elensky, and recruited to the West’s Great Cause-the race and civilizational war against China, and its destruction and dismemberment. You know that, Wizz-why pretend otherwise?

    • 同意: Avery
    • 回复: @Wizard of Oz
  699. @Truth Vigilante

    It was called ‘investable assets’ in the FT, in US dollars, by 2025. China’s saving rate is still c.45% of income. That adds up. Another chart in the FT shows investable assets rising by an average 15.5% p.a. over the last ten years or so, to 600 trillion renminbi.

    • 谢谢: Truth Vigilante
  700. @mulga mumblebrain

    I’m sorry you allow yourself to be misled by those former midlevel public servants who have pretended to retire to the artistic life but are really losers spinning tales for drinks in the Big Note Club. Predatory planners known to you? Don’t make me laugh.

  701. hhvictor 说:

    战场是流动的。可能会出现某一天赢了,第二天就输了。反之亦然。我想这就是战争迷雾。我的两分钱......

  702. geokat62 说:
    @John Johnson

    Yes that side is Putin.

    No, that side is Kolomoisky. The Russian side would welcome a quick victory. It’s Kolomoisky’s side that wants to draw this conflict out for as long as possible, in a war of attrition.

    I support the Ukrainian people and really don’t care about their president.

    Do you support all Ukrainian people, even the Russian-speaking residents in the East? If you did, why didn’t you speak out against the shelling of the residential areas in which these people dwelt that resulted in the death of over 13,000 innocent civilians?

    Unlike Putin he has a term limit.

    lol! What good are term limits when Kolomoisky can easily replace one of his puppets with another? The people are merely given the illusion of choice when there truly is none. You can pick Puppet A or Puppet B, the choice is yours, goy.

    Not sure what you mean by Secon Israel.

    摘录自 以色列在乌克兰建立“第二个以色列”的秘密计划:

    However, some Israelis and Jews abroad are not taking any chances. One of the main reasons why Ukrainian Jewish billionaire tycoon Ihor Kolomoisky, the governor of Ukraine’s Dnipropetrovsk province and citizen of Ukraine, Israel, and Cyprus, is spending tens of millions of dollars on the recruitment of right-wing Ukrainian nationalists and neo-Nazis from other parts of Europe to fight against the Russian-speaking majority in the Donbass region of eastern Ukraine, is a fear that plans to turn Ukraine into a «second Israel» will be derailed. Russia’s protective measures for the Donbass, as well as its incorporation by referendum of Crimea, the latter prized by the resurgent Khazarian Jewish nationalists, threaten the transformation of Ukraine into a second homeland for Ashkenazi Jews who are finding their hold on Israel prime tenuous, at best.

    https://redice.tv/news/israel-s-secret-plan-for-a-second-israel-in-ukraine

    What a cute hat. Wonder if it matches his height enhancing shoes.

    It is a cute hat. Wonder if he has the flags of all three countries (Ukraine, Israel, Cyprus) for which he has citizenship stitched on the back?

    • 同意: Incisive One
    • 回复: @John Johnson
  703. geokat62 说:

    This recent report dispels the silly rumours that Putin is seriously ill.

    摘录自 Is Putin ill? Claims the Russian leader has cancer explained, and what reports say about his health:

    However, no clear and incontrovertible evidence has been presented of any specific claim regarding Mr Putin’s health.

    Some of his opponents within and outside Russia have a vested interest in casting their adversary as weak or about to be removed, in an attempt to demoralise their enemy during the war.

    https://inews.co.uk/news/world/is-putin-ill-russian-russia-leader-has-cancer-explained-reports-health-back-1636940

    • 回复: @John Johnson
  704. @geokat62

    No, that side is Kolomoisky. The Russian side would welcome a quick victory. It’s Kolomoisky’s side that wants to draw this conflict out for as long as possible, in a war of attrition.

    So an Israeli billionaire is now responsible or the war? Are you really bringing in another angle of delusion?

    Putin started the war and could end it at any moment.

    The Ukrainians don’t want to live under a dictator and PutinTV/PutinWEB. They aren’t going to get on their knees and hand over their country to a dictator who wears height enhancing shoes.

    Obviously you support the dictator and his belief that the masses shouldn’t be allowed to vote or have websites like this one.

    The fact that you are now bringing in some rich Jew shows that you are increasingly desperate. What kind of play is that? Some rich Jew last card play?

    First NATO….then Nazis….Donbass…..now a scheming rich Jew is the reason?

    Putin is the cause and the Russian people will spit on his grave for starting this war. His dream of becoming a Peter or Catherine before he dies has failed. Another Alex II that embarrassed Russia with his arrogance and ignorance of military tactics.

    • 巨魔: Incisive One
    • 回复: @geokat62
    , @Truth Vigilante
  705. @geokat62

    This recent report dispels the silly rumours that Putin is seriously ill.

    Excerpt from, Is Putin ill? Claims the Russian leader has cancer explained, and what reports say about his health:

    That is an editorial that doesn’t dispel anything. It is just one person talking about how similar claims were made in the past.

    The difference is that the report on Putin’s health comes from UK intelligence services.

    In case you forgot the pro-Russia media outlets mocked US/UK intelligence claims that Putin was going to invade.

    The UK most likely has a mole.

    • 回复: @geokat62
  706. geokat62 说:
    @John Johnson

    In case you forgot the pro-Russia media outlets mocked US/UK intelligence claims that Putin was going to invade.

    Is that the same US/UK intelligence services that claimed Saddam had WMD and could launch them in 45 minutes? LOL!

    Ex-spy chief admits regret over Saddam 45 minutes claim

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2009/dec/08/chilcot-scarlett-45-minutes-saddam

    Yes, both these agencies have stellar records for getting things right, lol.

  707. geokat62 说:
    @John Johnson

    So an Israeli billionaire is now responsible or the war?

    Indeed, he is. Who groomed and financed Zelensky? Who financed the Azov Regiment? Follow the shekels, goy!

    Here is a pic of “Yats is our guy” sharing secrets (sotto voce) with kingpin Kolomoisky:

    • 回复: @j2
  708. geokat62 说:

    纳撒尼尔弟兄的最新一期, Playing Chess Russian Style



    视频链接
    摘抄:

    A “Rubicon moment” exists both in war and in chess.

    You must persevere in your attack or you will fall.

    Russia is ‘laying down its life for its friends’ in Ukraine to win a much wider triumph.

    It is to capture the king—which is the Western, Jew-controlled, Jew-inspired, Jew-financed, “globalism project.”

    https://www.realjewnews.com/?p=1541

    • 同意: Incisive One
    • 哈哈: Wizard of Oz
  709. j2 说:
    @geokat62

    “Indeed, he is. Who groomed and financed Zelensky? Who financed the Azov Regiment? Follow the shekels, goy!”

    This is Jewish narcissism. Mainly Jews (and this site, owned by Ron Unz) think that Jews are behind everything. Also, for the commenters in this site anybody who does not agree with Putintards is a Jew. That is narcissim and I suspect that these anomymous commenters are mostly Jews.

    Whether Kolomoyskyi was the Jewish force behind Azov or whether the real initiator was Nathan Khazin (former IDS and neo-Nazi) or his superiors. Nathan Khazin got funds to Azov from Kolomoyskyi, but Kolomoyskyi also funded other volonteer batallions in 2014 and may be just a Jewish oligarch without a greater role. We should focus on Khazin. Clearly here are curious connections. Many White Supremacists joined these volonteer batallions, like Azov, around 2014. The Unz Review is characterized as a while supremacist web site. So, here we have a clear link between a former IDS neo-Nazi Nathan Khazin and sites like the Unz Review. But there is also a link with dissident right and Putin, so Le Penn supports Putin, so did Trump, and Putin supported Trump against Hillery Clinton.

    So, we have white supremacists, IDS neo-Nazis, Azov, dissident right, the Unz Review and Putintards in this site all joined into a group that wanted a war in Ukraine and Putintards in it were willing to spread all lies like that 13,000 civilian were killed by UkriNazis during 2014-2022 in Eastern Ukraine. (According to UN, 13,000 died during this time, but 3,000 were Ukraine civilians, 4000 Ukrainian soldiers, 6000 separatist soldiers and 300 were civilians in a plane shot down.) Now, this does look like a plot of some kind, but Putintards are right in the middle of it.I certainly do not have a part in it.

    • 巨魔: Incisive One, nokangaroos
    • 回复: @geokat62
    , @Incisive One
  710. geokat62 说:
    @j2

    We should focus on Khazin.

    Thanks for bringing Ukraine’s Euromaiden Street Fighting Rabbi, Natan Khazin, to our attention.

    摘录自 The Ukrainian Revolution’s Unlikely Street-Fighting Rabbi:

    The following interview is with Natan Khazin, commander of a Jewish squadron of fighters in the Ukrainian revolution that took place in Kiev’s Maidan, or central square…

    The yarmulke-wearing Khazin, a veteran of the Israel Defense Forces and an ordained rabbi, is representative of many young Ukrainian Jews who are Zionist, religiously observant and at the same time strong Ukrainian patriots. Some of them refer to themselves humorously as Zhido-Banderists — a fusion of the pejorative term for “Jew” with the name Stepan Bandera, leader of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists, which fought for Ukrainian independence during World War II. The organization’s forces also participated in the massacre of Jews, so the term Zhido-Banderist is self-consciously ironic.

    采访已被编辑和压缩。

    https://forward.com/opinion/195785/the-ukrainian-revolution-s-unlikely-street-fight/

    … were willing to spread all lies like that 13,000 civilian were killed by UkriNazis during 2014-2022 in Eastern Ukraine.

    Thanks for clarifying. You are right, it is 13,000 deaths in total, not just civilians. I stand corrected.

    • 回复: @Incisive One
  711. Penalties increased for Russian defectors that change sides:

    https://www.usnews.com/news/world-report/articles/2022-05-25/new-punishments-await-russian-defectors-as-putin-grows-alarmed-over-ukraine

    Nothing says just cause like having to threaten your own soldiers into staying on your side.

    • 回复: @Incisive One
  712. Humwawa 说:

    I’m not a military analyst, but I never shared Ritter’s assessment that the massive Nato arms supplies wouldn’t have an impact. Even if the Russians manage to destroy some of it, some is bound to get through. I have always though that if the West is hell-bent on escalation, the Russians will have to control the whole of Ukraine, if not by physical occupation, then at least by totally destroying the transport infrastructure or by targeting everything that moves from the air. That could cause a lot of pain to Kyiv because supplies need to be brought in via land and the same transportation routes are used for military supplies.

    I still think the Russians are winning, but it really depends on how far the West is bent on escalating, knowing that each escalation will bringer us closer to WWIII. The NYT and Kissinger seem to think it’s time to stop escalating. The Democrats probably don’t want to go into the midterm election with a war drawing closer and the economic pain starting to hurt.

  713. @John Johnson

    You are lying, as usual, parroting the CNN/MSM propaganda bubble.  The text is:

    The new bill … would add penalties to the existing criminal code for those who participate “in an armed conflict, hostilities or other actions with the use of weapons and military equipment on the territory of a foreign state for purposes contrary to the interests of the Russian Federation,” according to translation of the proposed text.

    Anyone with half a brain can see that “add” means the code already exists, it is merely extending the existing penalty.  But not you.  

    Further, the existing code criminalises mercenaries, not defectors alone.  America; Australia; and several other countries have similar laws.  Belarus has just introduced the death penalty for similar lines.

    But no, you and your precious echo chamber have to twist that into something new, something evil, and somehow attach Putin “is alarmed” to it.

    • 同意: Lurker
    • 回复: @John Johnson
    , @Johann Ricke
  714. @j2

    (According to UN, 13,000 died during this time, but 3,000 were Ukraine civilians, 4000 Ukrainian soldiers, 6000 separatist soldiers and 300 were civilians in a plane shot down.)

    愚蠢的骗子。  

    The Donbas in nearly 100% ethnic Russians, and Ukraine has suppressed the Russian language and culture, since the violent Jew-inspired, NATO-backed 2014 Maidan.
    • the 3,000 “Ukrainian” civilians were ethnic Russian (yes, they were Ukrainian citizens)
    • in any case, that is a war crime, and that is 3,000 too many
    • the “6000 separatist soldiers” were ordinary civilians before they formed militias to protect themselves from the AFU shelling, they were not “soldiers”, but loosely formed defenders.
    • the 300 international passengers were killed in the Ukrainian false flag attack
    • the “4000 Ukrainian soldiers” over the eight period od the war remains suspicious (they are established and heavily fortified)

    To the un-perverted mind, it is 13,000 killed in AFU attacks against ethnic Russian civilians centres, in their suppression of ethnic Russians, and 9,600 of that were ethnic Russian civilians.

    • 同意: Avery
    • 回复: @j2
    , @Wizard of Oz
  715. @John Johnson

    Johnson & Johnson (aka J & J – named by his parents after a Big Pharma behemoth), wrote this:

    Putin is the cause and the Russian people will spit on his grave for starting this war. His dream of becoming a Peter or Catherine before he dies has failed.
    Another Alex II that embarrassed Russia with his arrogance and ignorance of military tactics.

    Yet another telltale sign that you’re a rabid Zionist Jew (to add to the hundreds of other obvious clues you’ve left along the way).

    The way you gloat in that statement of yours is undeniable proof that you’re proud of your Jewish forebears who assassinated Tsar Alexander II and I suspect that your household celebrates that each year – as you do other festivals involving the deaths of prominent goys due to Jewish orchestration.
    (No doubt November 22nd is a joyous day in your Talmudic community, not to mention the day Tsar Nicholas II and his family were murdered by Jewish thugs in 1918).
    Reminiscing about this gives you that warm fuzzy feeling in your tummy.

  716. @Incisive One

    Anyone with half a brain can see that “add” means the code already exists, it is merely extending the existing penalty. But not you.

    I said they were threatening the soldiers.

    Adding to the penalty is a threat to the soldiers.

    Switch sides and you will pay with serious prison time. That is the threat.

    Further, the existing code criminalises mercenaries, not defectors alone. America; Australia; and several other countries have similar laws. Belarus has just introduced the death penalty for similar lines.

    It’s a bad sign that they are doing this in the middle of a war.

    It means they have a problem with defectors.

    I already posted a recorded phone call where the Russian soldier is talking about being part of an anti-retreat squad.

    Belarus increased the penalty because they have soldiers volunteering for Ukraine.

    Russia is having problems with morale. That’s pretty obvious and a reality you will have to face eventually. When this is over Russian soldiers will write stories about how the morale was terrible and how conscripts shot themselves or damaged their equipment. Will be just like Vietnam with all kinds of tales of fragging officers.

    This is what happens in wars where the soldiers don’t believe in the cause. You get defections and also war crimes unfortunately. Even the Romans wrote about this problem.

  717. j2 说:
    @Incisive One

    “Stupid liar.
    The Donbas in nearly 100% ethnic Russians, ”

    You are the liar and you do not sound that intelligent.

    The majority in Donbas speaks Russian, but only a minority are ethnic Russians.
    “Ethnic Russians form the largest minority, accounting for 39% and 38.2% of the two oblasts respectively. In the present day, the Donbas is a predominately Russophone region. According to the 2001 census, Russian is the main language of 74.9% of residents in Donetsk Oblast and 68.8% in Luhansk Oblast.”

    “the 3,000 “Ukrainian” civilians were ethnic Russian (yes, they were Ukrainian citizens)”
    No, 39% of them were ethnic Russians as civilian causalities in street fighting do not check what is the ethnicity of the victims.

    “• in any case, that is a war crime, and that is 3,000 too many”
    Civilian causalities in a war are not a war crime. Targeting civilian objects with missiles and artillery is today a war crime, so is shooting civilians on purpose with light weapons. Russia soldiers have done this. There were cases of torture and rape in both sides during 2014-2022, as
    announced by the UN investigation report. But these did not amount to more than c. a hundred.

    “• the “6000 separatist soldiers” were ordinary civilians before they formed militias to protect themselves from the AFU shelling, they were not “soldiers”, but loosely formed defenders.”
    They were armed rebels, insurgents. This number also includes c. 500 Russian volonteers, who were actually soldiers without uniforms. These 6000 died because they tried an armed rebel against the government, so they were in a legal sense criminals, they made treason against the country by the rebel.

    “• the 300 international passengers were killed in the Ukrainian false flag attack”
    To me it looks like the BUK was shot by separatists. There is some evidence that this was the case, but I leave the decision to the legal investigators of this incidence.

    “• the “4000 Ukrainian soldiers” over the eight period od the war remains suspicious (they are established and heavily fortified)”
    This is the Ukrainian figure (actually 4,100). I cannot see any reason why they would exaggerate their losses.

    The majority in the areas occupied in 2022 in Donbas has a negative view of Russia in 2015 and they did not want to join Russia. Look at this Pew Research Center opinion poll from 2015. It is from the areas that at that time were controlled by Ukrainian government. Look at the borders for the ceasefire in September 2014 and you notice that the separatist area was about the same as it is now, so the areas that Russia occupied in 2022 were included in this poll:
    https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2015/06/10/3-ukrainian-public-opinion-dissatisfied-with-current-conditions-looking-for-an-end-to-the-crisis/

    The poll shows discontent on Poroshenko, but the relevant issue is the attitude towards Russians. In both West and East Ukraine (the government controlled area), Russia is seen as the threat and the origin of the violence, both East and West dislike Putin and East does not want to join EEC (Putin’s Eurasian Economic block) or join Russia.

    “To the un-perverted mind, it is 13,000 killed in AFU attacks against ethnic Russian civilians centres, in their suppression of ethnic Russians, and 9,600 of that were ethnic Russian civilians. ”

    To a pro-Russian propagandist the total causalities of 13,000 in a civil war turn into ethnic genocide of Russian speaking civilians by the UkriNazis. In reality, out of 3000 civilian victims about 3,500 were ethnic Russians who died because the separatists rebelled against the government. There have been many independence wars and in each war people have died. Only a perverted mind of a pro-Russian propagandist thinks that those who died in a war as combatants or as unintended civilian causalities were victims of an ethnic genocide. That is a totally different concept.

    • 谢谢: Wizard of Oz
    • 巨魔: Incisive One
  718. @Incisive One

    But no, you and your precious echo chamber have to twist that into something new, something evil, and somehow attach Putin “is alarmed” to it.

    There’s nothing evil about it. The problem he has is that if enough people are switching sides that he has to pass a law on the matter, the war itself may be not just unpopular but actually seen as unjust. For some, it may even have reached the kind of threshold where Russian troops might go gunning for the regime the way a big chunk of Russian soldiery decided, after WWI, that the Tsar not only had to be eliminated, but the entire Romanov clan killed, to the last man, woman and child.

    Putin is likely skillful enough to fend off this challenge, but it’s yet another reason for him to pull back from this imperial adventure before the disgruntlement reaches critical mass. Because once a single blow lands, the combo blanket party/war-of-all-against-all to decide who will rule Russia next could begin, with Putin as the guy under the blanket. Note that if he had taken Kiev in 3 days as planned, none of these not-so-sunny scenarios would be playing out. It was the road not taken.

    • 巨魔: Incisive One
  719. @Incisive One

    Is it a prosecutable war crime to emulate Abraham Lincoln in going to war against secessionist who take up arms? How so?

    • 回复: @j2
    , @Incisive One
  720. j2 说:
    @Wizard of Oz

    “Is it a prosecutable war crime to emulate Abraham Lincoln in going to war against secessionist who take up arms? How so?”

    Wizard, I so like to see here the old timers, who at least made some sense in the old times. Now this site is taken over by Orcs. Yest, one may feel sympathy to rebels, but if you rebel, you have to expect that the government sends the army to suppress the rebellion. It is the duty of soldiers to do it. Just simply so. Therefore, prefer negotiations to an armed rebellion. Armed uprising may be sometimes needed, but then you must know that the army is expected to suppress it and there will be deaths.

  721. Thank you. It also occurs to me to ask whether the supposed oppression of Russian speakers was reflected in a flood of refugees across the border to Russia!

    As it happens my attention to Lincoln’s motivation was drawn by my wondering whether his war wasn’t the greatest catastrophe ever inflicted on the US. After all slavery was on the way out even in Cuba and Brazil.

    • 回复: @j2
    , @mulga mumblebrain
  722. Lurker 说:
    @j2

    Sounds like you don’t have a fucking clue as regards the point I was making. Which is – they pump out no end of talmudic hairsplitting bullshit regardless of whether they contradict themselves or not.

    • 同意: Incisive One
  723. j2 说:
    @Wizard of Oz

    “It also occurs to me to ask whether the supposed oppression of Russian speakers was reflected in a flood of refugees across the border to Russia!”

    Apparently it did not. Instead, the UN report of the situation in Eastern Ukraine 2016 tells of an exchange of POWs where 40 POWS taken by Ukrainians refused to return to the separatist areas. Maybe it tells something of the real support of separatists at that time.

  724. @Wizard of Oz

    First a qualification. One cannot apply contemporary laws or concepts of tolerances to the past, or worse, evaluate the past against same.  Eg. homosexuality is accepted these days, whereas on could get killed in the old days, if not by the government then by the citizenry.  Such application or evaluation is hysterically stupid, it prevents understanding of the past that one is trying to understand.  One has to evaluate the past in the context that applied to it.  Eg. when examining the past, when slavery was a Good Thing, or the later past when it was a Bad Thing, it makes no sense to apply todays ideas about slavery.  Incidentally, that blows away the notion of reparations.

    So the concept of “war crime” is fairly new, and it applies to destruction of civilians not armed forces.  Separately, the war may be legal or not, justified or not, etc.

    Authority and therefore power,flows from above, not from below.  A monarch has both rights and responsibility to his domain.  Any rebellion (from below), is to be suppressed, and if there were crimes, then prosecuted.  The concept of rebellion (so-called “revolution”) starts with the spirit, it is the Jewish mindset, rebellion against God, His monarchs; etc. The French Rebellion and destruction of monarchies, which was really destruction of the Catholic Church.  The substitution of “democracy”, which is schizophrenic and has never worked, anywhere, except it the grand shows produced during campaigns.

    I do not know American history well enough to answer your question about that war, and I mean the whole context, what lead to the war, etc, not just the Constitution that the South joined, and then rebelled against.  I know enough to know that it was not only about slavery, as it is fashionable to think of today.  

    I do not wish to avoid the question, so I will answer it using the Russian SMO.  Ukraine is best understood as a province of Russia, for over one thousand years.  Other than the last 100 years, it did not exist as an entity, the notion of independence is absurd.  The whole of it was Soviet, for 100 years, currently the East and South are Russian, in more than just language and culture.  The notion of small independent ex-Soviet states it simply not feasible, one needs a big brother as both a market and a protector.  So the choice was NATO or Russia.  The notion of equality and immanence is very seductive.  That has turned out to be a choice between God-less filth; degeneracy; chaos vs God and peace.

    So the first rebellion was the movement towards NATO, being seduced by NATO, hosting training and bio warfare labs, from 1991 onwards.  By about 2000, it was in full swing, especially the elevation of neo-nazism (as distinct from actual NSDAP) and Russia should have crushed it, except that it was weak.

    2000 to 2014 saw the wholesale theft of the state, and the rise of oligarchs (same as in Russia wherein it was a lesser extent).  Russia should have crushed that, if not as a rebellion, then as anarchy, which corruption is.  The citizenry were destitute.

    By 2014, we have a full-blown, rogue, puppet state, controlled by external puppet masters, massive elevation of neo-nazism, crushing the East and South (which rejected its status and maintained its values), and engaged in civil war. The formation of two republics.  That was the start of Russian engagement, but obviously not full-scale, not to fix the whole country.  It was the task of the [Good] motherland to crush the evil in the North & West, and thus to prevent the North & West denying its history, crushing the Russian language, and from that spiritual position, bombarding the South & East.

    With the evidenced build-up preparing for a major campaign to “re-take” Crimea, and conquer Donetsk & Lugansk, Russia was forced to make a pre-emptive strike, and now that it is stronger, make any such corrections permanent, the peace permanent.  As I have stated elsewhere on UR, the entire South and East will return to Russia.

    All choices in life boil down to choosing between Good and Evil, capitalised because I mean the objective kind, not the personal kind, which is subjective, and guaranteed to repeat the sin of Adam.

    So it is a just war, a legal war, for self-preservation, in the face of genocide.

    As such, Russia treats all Ukrainian ordinaries as plain PoWs, to be exchanged at any time (AFU has no PoWs, so they have to wait for the end of hostilities).

    But if they committed war crimes (excludes killing combatants, includes mistreatment of combatants and harming civilians, per the Geneva Convention), yes, they will be tried for such cries.  Obviously, that means the neo-nazis who bombed; raped; pillaged DPR & LPR.

    If you constrain your scope to Ukraine, denying the entire historical context, and pretend that it is a sovereign rogue state, that has the right to crush the rebellious South and East, that is quite a different discussion. When it went rogue, it went from Good to Evil, when it started killing its own civilians, it proved that point. The South & East had agreed to whatever was defined as the Constitution in 1991, they did not agree to the changed Constitution of 2014.  So it is a valid separation, a divorce (as when the husband or wife unilaterally changes the marriage vows and now wants to swing).

    America was in the same situation leading up to 6 Jan, the militias should have risen up against Evil.  But the masculinity had been strategically weakened before that, so it suffered erectile dysfunction.  Their honour, their shame failed, now they can look forward to losing their guns and their children.

    Your question is not a simple one, I hope I gave it due consideration.

    • 回复: @Wizard of Oz
    , @Lurker
  725. @Incisive One

    You didn’t really need your opening qualification as I didn’t ask whether Lincoln’s war was justified but whether the similar action today of treating separatist rebels who take up arms as justifying firm action by the central government is valid.

    I won’t go into your attempt to in effect argue, contrary to fact, that the remaining Russian Federation is the legitimate central government that can treat Ukraine as legally separatist and subject to destruction of it s cities and killing of its citizens to enforce that aberrant view. I won’t because your ignorance of or indifference to the c. 1200 year history of Ukraine and its last 32 years sees to profound and foundational to your point of view.

    One example will do. I don’t suppose you are actually lying like Putin when you parrot his line in the salvage of

    Ukraine is best understood as a province of Russia, for over one thousand years

    .  

    In reality Russia didn’t exist 1000 years ago when Christianity came to the great city of Kyiv while heathen rulers of Muscovy ,as the forest bound village of Moscow was then calle,d killed the missionary Christians who sought to convert them.

  726. Lurker 说:
    @Incisive One

    I just don’t know enough of the history but it seems like if the collapse of the USSR had been less chaotic, a more managed process – maybe Ukraine would not have been constituted as a separate state at all?

    • 回复: @Incisive One
  727. j2 说:
    @Wizard of Oz

    “Ukraine is best understood as a province of Russia, for over one thousand years ”

    Wiz: In reality Russia didn’t exist 1000 years ago when Christianity came to the great city of Kyiv

    It is strange from what old maps Putin got the concept that Ukraine does not exist and has been a part of Russia. It is just the opposite. In the 12th century Moskow Russia was the province Rostow-Suzdal of Kievan Rus’, which had the capital in Kiev and is today known as Ukraine.

    In the 16th century almost all of Ukraine was a part of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, though Crime was a Khanate. After that Ukraine was part of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth up to Peter the Great, who took a part. That means, in the 17th century Ukraine still was practically all (except for Crime) in the Commonwealth. Only in fairly recent times, times of Peter the Great and divisions of Poland, Ukraine was a part of Russia. But Crime was originally in Byzantine and then in Golden Orda and finally Crimean Khanate (neither Russia, nor Ukraine).

    • 谢谢: WIzard of Oz
    • 回复: @Incisive One
  728. @j2

    I thought you were serious, that you wanted to understand the conflict in it full context, which requires a dispassionate view of the facts, of both history and todays circumstance.  Your post proves you are merely a one-eyed runt, a Banderite, with the usual simplistic biases that both afflict such people, and give them strength.  Pardon my mistake.

    This paragraph is unadulterated propaganda, I will respond to a couple of items only, to complete the thread for the benefit of readers with two eyes:

    I won’t go into your attempt to in effect argue, contrary to fact, that the remaining Russian Federation is the legitimate central government that can treat Ukraine as legally separatist and subject to destruction of it s cities and killing of its citizens to enforce that aberrant view. I won’t because your ignorance of or indifference to the c. 1200 year history of Ukraine and its last 32 years sees to profound and foundational to your point of view.

    Making a blanket statement without specific points that can be proved true or false is dishonest, the Talmudic trick of introducing doubt without touching the subject.  If and when you give a specific example of anything I have stated that is contrary to fact, you will achieve the humanity that begs a response.

    War does destroy cities and civilians, which is why honourable men seek to minimise that, which as evidenced the “Ukrainians” maximise.  In this case, it is the “Ukrainians” that have committed war crimes, destroying their own cities and civilians (everything from 8 years of bombing civilian cities and infrastructure, to the horrendous destruction since 24 Feb, destroying dams; 300 bridges; hiding heavy artillery and ammo dumps in schools, hospitals, shopping centres; using illegal munitions against civilians, etc).  

    The Zelensky regime is playing out a sacrificial war, their god is Moloch, it demands human sacrifice, he openly states that he is creating a new IsraHell, that means along the lines of the mythical 六百万.

    The notion of “Ukraine” is less than 100 years old, to suggest that it has a 1,200 year history is Banderite propaganda of the last 70 years.  It has no evidence, it contradicts the great body of historical facts (denial), it is a myth (manufacture of fantasy).

    Your Talmudic pig-poop-eating neo-Nazi compatriots typically say:

    Kievan Rus is 1,200 years old, therefore Ukraine is 1,200 years old
    and worse:
    Russia is formed from Ukraine

    Fails historic facts.  Kievan Rus is the birth of Russia, there was no concept of “Ukraine” then, and not for another 1,100 years.  Fails because you are applying a modern concept to past history.  Typical of criminals and the deranged.

    One example will do.

    No, it won’t.  Cherry-picking single examples is schizophrenic.  It is two crimes, not one. First you deny the great body of evidence that contradicts your propaganda (the eye that you have gouged out).  Second you cherry-pick a fact, isolate it from the context in which it exists, and twist it to mean something that it is not (the remaining eye that sees only what it wants to see).

    I don’t suppose you are actually lying like Putin when you parrot his line in the salvage of

    乌克兰最好被理解为俄罗斯的一个省

    Well, it is historical fact, if you remove the denial of historical facts, and view history dispassionately.  Since I have not crippled myself, since I have not destroyed the wonderful gifts that God gave me, it is no surprise that I state history.  Putin evidently has intact sight, and does not suffer your derangement.  I am quite happy to parrot evidenced history, that can be relied upon, whereas you parrot pig-poop of recent manufacture.  

    In any case, the expiry date of your hilarious notion is 31 Aug 2022.

    Read this, the best, short synopsis re the history of “Ukraine”, and thus the motivation of all involved parties:

    https://www.rt.com/russia/556073-russians-never-let-go-ukraine/

    • 回复: @j2
  729. @Lurker

    是的。

    But if I had to pick a single thing that erred, that required correction, I would nominate the 1914 declaration.

  730. @geokat62

    You are right, it is 13,000 deaths in total, not just civilians. I stand corrected.

    No, the Jew is lying, as usual. See my comment #731.

  731. Lurker 说:
    @Quartermaster

    I doubt any Ukrainian born after about 1913 remembers life under Russian rule.

  732. @Wizard of Oz

    My comment #745 was meant for you, not Jew 2. But of course it applies to all Talmudists.

  733. j2 说:
    @Incisive One

    “Read this, the best, short synopsis re the history of “Ukraine”, and thus the motivation of all involved parties:

    https://www.rt.com/russia/556073-russians-never-let-go-ukraine/ =

    Your link does not work. However, you can look at this link of Kievan Rus’

    https://www.thearchaeologist.org/blog/origin-of-kievan-rus-the-big-northeastern-european-federation-of-the-9th-century

    You have there a picture of the languages of tribes living in c. 800 around the area you now call Russia, Belarussia and Ukraine. In the place where the Grand Duchy of Moscow later was, you have Fenno-Ugrian (indeed, Finnic) tribes Merya, Meschera, Murom, Mordvans, Meri. In the place where Novgorod was, you have, in addition to Ilmen Slavs, several Baltic Finnic tribes: Carelians, Veps, Chuds. They were, according to the Chronic of Rurik, among the founders of Rus’. The capital of Rus’ moved to Kiev and Ukrainians, Belarusians and Russians all claim to derive from Rus’, but the least right for this derivation has Russia, as it was a province originally not inhabited by Slavic people but by Finnic people. Most right has Ukraine, see from this language map where Slavic people were living c. 800 AD. Kievan Rus’ destroyed Khazars in the 9th century, so they have some claim to Crime, though later there was the Crimean Khanate. This Khanate was later destroyed by Russia in the 18th century, so this is the only historical claim Russia has for Crime. But historical claims are not valid today. The reason why Ukraine is a country is that it is accepted as an independent country by other independent countries and the UN. That is the valid claim. Ukraine so far includes Crime and Donbas separatist areas because they have not been recognized as part of Russia or as independent by the majority of other nations and the UN.

    You mix me up with Wizard: you copy his text and claim that I have written it.

    “No, the Jew is lying, as usual.”

    I am not Jewish and I do not lie, you spread false propaganda and hide your identity, very possibly you are also Jewish since in the old times commenters acting like you were mostly hasbaras.

    • 同意: Wizard of Oz
    • 巨魔: Incisive One
    • 回复: @Been_there_done_that
  734. @Incisive One

    The Wizz is a sabbat goy, NOT a Talmudist. Why, if he read the Talmud, he would have to be killed, as the Talmud decrees.

    • 哈哈: Incisive One
    • 回复: @Wizard of Oz
  735. @Wizard of Oz

    Atta boy, Wizz-let’s all kill one another based on what allegedly happened one thousand years ago. I knew you’d be a Banderite fan-boy. Just knew it.

  736. @Wizard of Oz

    The number of inhabitants of the Donbass that fled for their lives into Russia, escaping your boyfriends in the Azov, Adair and other Nazi death-squads, was well over one million. Your use of the expression ‘supposed’ oppression is Evil and despicable, even for you.

    • 同意: Incisive One
    • 回复: @Wizard of Oz
    , @j2
  737. @mulga mumblebrain

    I have never/would never open a lift or turn the heating on for a Talmudist!

  738. @Incisive One

    I shall not waste time working out whether you are actually insane or merely a very malicios troll.

  739. j2 说:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    “The number of inhabitants of the Donbass that fled for their lives into Russia, escaping your boyfriends in the Azov, Adair and other Nazi death-squads, was well over one million. ”

    You are partially correct, but your statement can be made more precise. More than a million refugees from Donbas escaped to Russian before 2022, mainly between 2014 and 2016 when the war was most active, so they were war refugees. In the same time 1.6 million refugees from Donbas escaped to other parts of Ukraine (i.e., government controlled areas), also as war refugees. Though the Wikipedia is often incorrect, in this case it seems to be correct, so I paste a piece of 2022 Ukrainian refugee crisis:

    “More than a million of the pre-2022 refugees, mainly from Donbas,[27] had gone to Russia between 2014 and 2016,[28] while the number of people displaced within Ukraine had grown to 1.6 million people by early March 2016.” (Wiki)

  740. @j2

    In reference to another commentator:

    …spread false propaganda and hide your identity, very possibly you are also Jewish since in the old times commenters acting like you were mostly hasbaras.

    This shady character already exposed himself three days ago. He had spread false claims about the alleged legality of the war and about Finland, refused to acknowledge the facts when they were presented, then kept on denying he was wrong.

    Here is the crucial post amidst the prior back-and-forth exchange, which provides insights about the mechanism of lying and denial:

    GMT 25年2022月10日上午24:XNUMX
    https://www.unz.com/mwhitney/whats-the-deal-with-germany/#comment-5359195

    • 回复: @j2
  741. LeoXamine 说:
    @meamjojo

    消息来源是“乌克兰军事首领”。
    哈哈。来吧伙计。

  742. boomerfeed 说:
    @Alrenous

    美国人不必从任何其他群体的战争罪行、入侵其他国家、窃取土地、杀害平民方面吸取教训。 至少从谢尔曼以来,这些都是历史悠久的传统。

  743. Gimpward 说:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    2 years later we see the Ukrainians were right too stay away from Russia. Ever since 1917 it’s been ruled by a band of retards. And the Russians killed a few hundred thousand Tartars in Crimea around the same time. Should Tartars forever be disposed to hatred towards Russians?

当前评论者
说:

发表评论 -


 记得 我的信息为什么?
 电子邮件回复我的评论
$
提交的评论已被许可给 Unz评论 并可以由后者自行决定在其他地方重新发布
在翻译模式下禁用评论
通过RSS订阅此评论主题 通过RSS订阅所有Mike Whitney评论