Unz评论•另类媒体选择$
美国主流媒体大都排除了有趣,重要和有争议的观点
 博客浏览迈克·惠特尼(Mike Whitney)档案
华盛顿会在俄罗斯大选日发动“假旗”吗?
通过电子邮件将此页面发送给其他人

 记住我的信息



=>

书签 全部切换总目录添加到图书馆从图书馆中删除 • B
显示评论下一个新评论下一个新回复了解更多
回复同意/不同意/等等 更多... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
同意不同意谢谢LOL轮唱
这些按钮可将您的公开协议,异议,感谢,LOL或巨魔与所选注释一起注册。 仅对最近使用“记住我的信息”复选框保存姓名和电子邮件的频繁评论者可用,并且在任何八个小时的时间内也只能使用三次。
忽略评论者 关注评论者
搜寻文字 区分大小写  确切的词  包括评论
列表 书签

“我们掌握的可靠信息表明,美国教官在 At-Tanf 镇附近训练了一些激进组织,在叙利亚南部进行涉及化学战剂的挑衅……他们正在准备一系列化学弹药爆炸。 这个事实将被用来指责(叙利亚)政府军。 ……在地中海东部、波斯湾和红海,正在组建由美国海军航母组成的打击群,这些地区正在为可能的袭击做准备。” 俄罗斯总参谋部发言人谢尔盖·鲁兹科伊将军,17 年 2018 月 XNUMX 日

The United States is closer to a war with Russia than anytime since the Cuban missile crisis, but brainwashed Americans don’t have a clue about what’s going on.

正在发生的事情是这样的:美国在叙利亚的局势在过去两周显着恶化。 华盛顿希望其中央情报局支持的武装分子能够在东古塔保持立足点,让他们能够继续向大马士革市中心发射迫击炮和火箭,从而对叙利亚政府施加额外压力。 但是,来自东部的拉卡(Raqqa)和艾尔·丹夫(Al Tanf)的圣战分子出人意料地被来自黎巴嫩民兵真主党的经过战斗训练的战斗部队切断。 紧接着,猛虎部队的精锐部队包围了东古塔口袋,迅速将战场分割成三个日渐缩小的大锅。

叙利亚军对恐怖分子飞地的地面攻击是迅速,集中和凶猛的。 在短短几天之内,SAA夺回了70%的反叛者占领区,在猛攻中杀死了数百名圣战分子,而俄罗斯轰炸机则毫不留情地捣乱了他们的藏身之处超过两个星期。 叙利亚闪电战为华盛顿军阀敲响了警钟,他们抱有微弱希望,希望他们的逊尼派步兵能够无限期地坚持下去并扭转战争进程。 随着东古塔(East Ghouta)的瓦解以及大多数外国出生的代理人的接送路线,这种希望已烟消云散。 如果阿勒颇战役是叙利亚的斯大林格勒(二战“转折点”),那么东古塔战役就是叙利亚的库尔斯克战役,“这是战争取得全面胜利的关键所在”。 叙利亚战争的结果已无悬念。 抵抗轴心获胜。 (又名俄罗斯-叙利亚-伊朗,真主党)

This is why Washington is in a state of panic, they can finally see the handwriting on the wall. Their precious New World Order is being ground into dust in a pock-marked urban wastelands 10,000 miles from Washington. And, that’s why the rabid Nikki Haley has ramped up her hyperbolic performances at the UN Security Council. Here’s what she said just last week:

“When the international community consistently fails to act, there are times when states are compelled to take their own action….. the United States remains prepared to act if we must. It is not a path we prefer. But it is a path we have demonstrated we will take, and we are prepared to take again.”

Is she serious? Is Washington really planning to bomb Syrian troops in East Ghouta –which will unavoidably kill Russian Special Forces and advisors in the process– to save their jihadist proxies from impending annihilation? Is that worth risking WW3?

华盛顿的恐慌是我以前从未见过的。 不仅仅是 Nikki Haley 表演她标志性的“停药和停药”表演,整个政治机构和他们的媒体傀儡都屈服于反俄罗斯的歇斯底里。 这些人只是与现实失去了联系。 他们的集体焦虑几乎每天都以能想象到的最具挑衅性的语言出现在头条新闻上。 对弗拉基米尔·普京的妖魔化达到了冷战期间从未见过的程度。 这是绝对的疯狂,这全是因为华盛顿疯狂的全球主义计划利用外国出生的代理人推翻叙利亚的合法政府而落败了。 作为美国人,我们应该为此感到难过吗? 我们是否应该对国际主义的蟑螂感到某种忠诚,他们抓住了国家力量的杠杆,并用它们杀害和伤害整个中东的人们,进行一些难以捉摸的统治世界的计划?

一定不行!

The spurious claims that Putin poisoned a double agent and his daughter fit perfectly within this same sordid strategy to vilify those countries that are, in fact, defending the principles upon which the international order rests: State sovereignty, strict borders, self determination and non intervention, all of which have been discarded like garbage by the “exceptional” country that puts itself squarely above the law.

There is no more proof that Moscow was involved in the poisoning of the Russian double agent than there is that Russia meddled in the 2016 elections. None. The whole matter is a risible remake of Colin Powell’s appalling “Anthrax” slapstick at the UN, where the career general sacrificed his personal credibility and integrity to hoodwink America’s allies into a savage war of annihilation on the Iraqi people. Theresa May is merely taking over where Powell left off. Her job is to build the case for war whether there is proof or not. The cabal of western leaders have decided that Russia must pay for its impudence, that more must be done to ratchet up the pressure on Russia, and that Putin’s resolve must be put to the test.

But how far can Putin be pushed, that is the question, isn’t it? And how will he respond if Washington takes things to the next level? Will he respond proportionately, overwhelmingly or not at all? Washington wants to know. The US figures it’s gone as far as it can with mere sanctions, demonization and armed proxies. Washington has decided that a limited but direct confrontation is the next logical step. Judging by the outpouring of deranged fulminations in the media, the decision to attack has already been made. (That is my guess, at least.)

Russia has become the biggest single obstacle to Washington’s global ambitions. Trump’s new National Defense Strategy makes that point quite clear. Moscow is blocking US plans to redraw the map of the Middle East, control vital resources and pipelines corridors, and pivot to this century’s most prosperous markets in Asia. All of that is now at risk, and Russia is to blame. Is it any wonder why the media denounces Putin as “The New Hitler”?

The defeat in East Ghouta changes everything. The gloves are coming off and Washington is ramping up for a shooting war with its biggest emerging rival. The hostile and frantic statements issuing from NATO headquarters and from UK, France, and Germany all suggest the momentum for war is building and that an attack could be launched in a matter of days. Some analysts believe the US will fire cruise missiles from warships in the Mediterranean as early as March 19, a date that was picked to coincide with the Russian presidential elections.

Leaders in the Kremlin are taking these threats seriously, and have warned that if the US attacks their troops or advisors in Syria, Russia will retaliate, and they will attack the platforms from which the missiles were launched. They will aim their missiles at US warships in the Mediterranean. Think about that for a minute: The lunatics in Washington are mulling over a calculated attack on Russia (in Syria) that could quickly escalate into a nuclear war just so they can find out whether Putin is bluffing or not. Isn’t that why Tillerson was just replaced for Pompeo, so the behind-the-scenes powerbrokers would have another warmongering neocon nutcase in a position of authority who would breezily rubber-stamp their plans for nuclear holocaust?

这些人完全处于失控状态。

Washington has a lot riding on this. The NWO is not a fantasy, it’s a plan for melding together banking systems, trade policy, open borders, one-dominant currency, and the endless recycling of revenues into US debt instruments. It’s a strategy to ensure that the world’s wealth continues to flow upwards and into the bulging coffers of the western plutocrats who oversee the system and and manage its wars. I don’t see any other option for the globalists running the show than to launch a precision aerial assault from warships in the Mediterranean to see if they can reverse the situation on the ground and improve their chances for victory in Syria. As crazy as it sounds, they think it is a risk worth taking.

The hope is that Putin will not retaliate, or if he does, that he does not attack US warships directly. But that’s a pretty risky bet, after all, if Putin does NOT attack the platforms from which the missiles were fired, then he’ll be inviting similar attacks in the future. So, his hands are tied. He must retaliate or face the consequences in the future.

The next few weeks are going to be very tense. We’ve reached the point where the US will have to either confront Russia militarily or accept that their vicious project in Syria has failed. My gut feeling is that the foreign policy establishment is not ready to throw in the towel just yet. They are going do something very risky and very stupid. They’re going to roll the dice and hope they don’t come up snake-eyes.

Whatever the decision may be, we should know soon enough. I think we could see signs of provocative activity as soon as the presidential elections begin in Russia on March 18. I hope I’m wrong.

 
• 类别: 对外政策 •标签: 美国军事, 阴谋论, 俄罗斯, 叙利亚 
隐藏19条评论发表评论
忽略评论者...跟随Endorsed Only
修剪评论?
    []
  1. AnonFromTN [又名“ Anon”] 说:

    TN的Anon
    I don’t see why not. “Chemical attacks” in Syria were either fakes or false flag operations, where Western-supplied chemicals were used by the head-choppers. Skripal was a false-flag operation, i.e., if there was an operation: at the moment we can’t even be sure that Skripal and his daughter were poisoned, not to mention with what and by whom. The sure sign of false flag operation is immediate accusations by real perpetrators of the designated “guilty” party. No investigation is necessary: the perpetrator knows who he intends to accuse.

    • 同意: ben tillman
  2. Patriot 说:

    只要以色列保持相对未受影响,美国和俄罗斯是否相互摧毁并不重要。

  3. Miro23 说:

    I agree that there is a build up to an attack on Syria. Americans are being prepared for THE EVENT .

    从媒体管弦乐队的音量(设定情感基调)来看,它已经到位,并且“事件”将证明美国海军对叙利亚进行全面导弹“反应”(攻击)是合理的。 主要参与者已经研究并准备好他们的角色,技术方面已检查并准备就绪。

    目标是摧毁叙利亚/伊朗/真主党军队(以及撤出俄罗斯军队),从而使叙利亚伊拉克化。 巴沙尔·阿萨德(Bashar al-Assad),伊朗人和普京被妖魔化,该项目旨在获得足够的势头和内部逻辑(美国军方介入),然后流入摧毁伊朗和将真主党从黎巴嫩等地撤出。换句话说,目标这是美国为巩固以色列/美国在中东的实力而进行的单次,扩大的,也是最后的中东战争。

    Since THE EVENT has the same scriptwriters as 9/11 it’s probably going to be the same kind of drama with a great visual impact, beautifully captured on film, and ready to be broadcast 24/7, with a heroic US military “response” that is fast and overwhelming. However, there is the critical question of targeting.

    The script calls for the Syrians to use chemical weapons (WMD) such that they are the initial target, and get obliterated, along with the Hezbollah and Iranian troops in the country. That leaves a very critical opening for the Russians to recognize that the situation as hopeless, admit defeat and leave the ME with their tail between their legs = no WW3.

    I would guess that Putin has already been informed of his part in the script (along with some face saving exit options) and that his confounding reply came on March 1st – that Russia would respond if it or its allies were attacked. “Or its allies” clearly meaning the Syrian government and that gives the Neocons a problem.

    It looks like the Neocons are in a WW2 Kursk like situation with regard to Syria. Preparations for an attack are far advanced but the Russians aren’t backing down, they’ve had time to prepare and they’re stronger than anticipated. To get some context, Guderian questioned the logic of the upcoming battle, and Hitler replied, “I know. The thought of it turns my stomach.” Guderian concluded, “In that case your reaction to the problem is the correct one. Leave it alone” – Which he didn’t.

    The Neocons still have a chance to learn from history and “Leave it alone” and they should take it.

    • 回复: @Realist
  4. Anon • 免责声明 说:

    There won’t be any attack on Syria until at least the North Korean conference is over – and probably some time afterwards as negotiations play out. The Deep State won’t like it, but perhaps Putin should make a personal appeal to Trump and offer to work some things out before that time comes (meet with the guy in Switzerland). It could work.

    Also, I would hope that the Deep State isn’t so stupid as to make Putin more popular by interfering. I’ve heard that Putin’s true popularity is declining.

    • 回复: @Realist
  5. Realist 说:
    @Miro23

    “新保守派仍有机会从历史中吸取教训,‘别管它’,他们应该抓住它。”

    这不是新保守主义者所做的。

  6. Realist 说:
    @Anon

    “Also, I would hope that the Deep State isn’t so stupid as to make Putin more popular by interfering.”

    他们是。

  7. 虽然惠特尼可能是对的,我们正面临着最后的倒计时,但我的直觉反应恰恰相反。 美国Centcom指挥官在阿萨德获胜之前的声明是一个迹象,俄罗斯威胁说有假旗即将到来,这表明他们沉没了舰队,因此掩盖了更多,这是真正威胁的迹象。如果发生这种假旗,我们知道这可能会结束。 我还认为特朗普本人并不赞同,他可能已经解雇了蒂勒森,因为尽管蓬佩奥过去发表过声明,但他更擅长服从自己的命令。 另外,他似乎正在加紧准备,以应付荨麻和开枪的穆勒,首先要求他的司法部采取行动,如果他们不这样做,可能会动自己。 尽管蒂勒森外交部的反对,他在朝鲜问题上的行动违背了公认的智慧,并接受了导致可能摆脱僵局的南朝鲜谈判,这也是一根稻草。 我们最大的希望是,由于特朗普有很多孩子,尽管他明显无知,但他拥有德国人过去所说的农民聪明(bauernschlau:农民狡猾)他感觉到筹码实际上已经下降,后果可能是一切都结束了。 这将决定我们是否生存。 尽管失败的几率很严重,但如果Harpy上任,失败的几率将接近100%,并且到现在可能已经结束了。

  8. eD 说:

    19月XNUMX日是明天,所以我们将会看到。 当然,该文章指出这只是“最早的日期”。

    很难预测疯狂的人会做什么。

    • 回复: @SolontoCroesus
  9. Anonymous [AKA "Snowdown"] 说:

    Russia is reporting a large cyber-attack on their elections.

  10. Mikey 说:

    Any talk of the USA obilterating forces in Syria is the sign that people watch too many movies.

    对于对巴格达的震惊袭击,美国已经集结了更大的力量。 如果我没记错的话,有 3 个 CVN,再加上邻国基地的更多陆基空军。 加上巡航导弹弹幕。

    First, the US only has 1 CVN in the area, and I haven’t heard any tales like the pre-Iraq war of American air units being redeployed to the region. They have some airpower there of course, but what’s been attacking in Syria and Iraq is nothing like the scope of the shock n awe attack.

    A likely reason for this is that Syria has competent air defenses with additional Russia forces including good air superiority fighters in the area. The Americans are notoriously casualty adverse, and support at home for this war is shaky at best. The Americans can probably turn one downed pilot into a wag the dog hero, but not if they start taking much more losses than a single plane or so.

    Thus, like the attack in April after a different false-flag chem weapon attack, the Americans are likely to rely on cruise missiles. First, those of you who are American taxpayers out there, these are very expensive. A million dollars a missile, so when Trump orders a strike of 60 or so of these, he’s basically burning 60 million dollars that could otherwise give teachers a raise.

    But the main problem is, they don’t work. I don’t remember the exact numbers, but of the 60 or so missiles they launched last time only about 20 hit their targets. The Russians were very, very quiet about whether their advanced EW capabilities had anything to do with this. But the one thing that seems for sure is that 2 out of 3 missiles launched are unlikely to even reach their target. And that was without any active effort to shoot down the missiles. The Russians refrained from possibly escalating the situation in that manner the last time. This time their backs are pushed to the wall and they are openly warning that they’ll do so this time.

    So, while I wouldn’t want to be standing around when 20 or so 1000 lbs warheads land and explode, that is far, far, far short of ‘obilterating’ any forces. Especially because they are also vulnerable to another American weakness which is poor intelligence. The Americans like to blow up buildings, but only a fool would be sitting inside waiting for the strike. So, when they blow up an ‘intelligence HQ’, all they really do is kill a few janitors. After a long bombing campaign in Serbia where American TV showed lots of impressive film of targets being exploded, it was revealed after the war that the Americans had blown up a bunch of decoys and very few tanks and guns. Sadly, what the Americans are good at doing is blowing up passenger trains and embassies and tv stations.

    Either way, there won’t be any ‘obilterating’ going on. If the Americans get lucky, they might deliver a blow to a small handful of units and facilities. But that’s a long, long way from obliteration. Same as in Vietnam, the Syrians will emerge from their bunkers, pick up the pieces from the hits they do take, then keep on fighting.

    Except, that perhaps world war 3 just began.

  11. Anonymous [AKA "Kalin"] 说:

    五角大楼告诉特朗普,他一次只能进行一场战争,因此我以朝鲜会议为例。 因此,一旦确定叙利亚是下一个目标,特朗普就不得不让步并为朝鲜局势降温。

    Its the firing of Tillerson and his replacement with Pompei that scares me. I have no love for chairmen of Exxon, but Tillerson had to be intelligent and sane to rise to such a position. If nothing else, his background is that one has to make a deal. Thermonuclear war is not an option for a chair of Exxon who competes with BP on some issue. Its more a matter of which company can use its resources and make deals to its advantage.

    We’d seen Tillerson trying to come along behind Trump with a pooper-scooper trying to clean up the messes Trump leaves on the carpet.

    Politicians, especially nobody rural ones like Pompei are a different matter. They make their living by ranting and raving and making crazy claims and big, big threats. Everytime as CIA head assassin that Pompei spoke, he scared me with his rabid stupidity and threats.

    Tillerson was obviously fired on the spot by Trump for some offense. Likely a disagreement in a meeting. And it now appears that the meeting likely concerned giving the go-ahead for this drive to WW3 that we are seeing today.

  12. Anonymous [AKA "Sun Tsu"] 说:

    令我害怕的是,普京的 3/1 言论可能与预期产生了相反的效果。

    普京似乎打算用一种有力的方式说“听我们说”。

    Unfortunately, I think it had the effect of starting WW3.

    Putin announced a series of new weapons that make massive American investments in both strategic missile defense and aircraft carrier groups completely useless. However, these new weapons were only tested or at best entering production. Therefore, there is a gap of a few years before Russia gets these weapons built and fully deployed.

    Thus, the crazy neocons in Washington are likely to see this as ‘use them or lose them.’ Hundreds of billions of dollars have been wasted on weapons that will be worthless within a few years. But they still might have some usefulness today. Particularly the carrier groups. In a few years, the USN won’t be able to park a carrier in the Persian Gulf. But for now, they still can.

    Even worse, the Americans have no new significant weapons in the pipeline. They are producing new F-35s, but half of them can’t even fly. The units that already have them report at best about 50% are flying at any time. Quite possibly this is a giant mistake that will weaken America for a decade or longer. Meanwhile, the Navy’s giant 13 billion dollar carrier the Gerald Ford has a hard time getting out of port without tripping over its feet. It won’t be really operational until after the Russian carrier killers are active. The JFK and yet another carrier behind that aren’t even close to ready. The Army is just starting to think about a new tank, but that’s years if not decades away.

    我担心的是,在普京发表讲话后不久,华盛顿的疯狂白痴就决定发动第三次世界大战的最佳时机是现在。 每当他们等待让俄罗斯生产新武器时,他们的情况就会变得更糟。 在他们腐败的国防承包商管道中,没有任何东西值得推迟战争来获得。

    My guess is that Tillerson didn’t sign up with Trump to start WW3, and that was the decision being made when Trump fired him for trying to be a voice of reason.

  13. @eD

    如果博尔顿在图片中,那么莱丁也是,莱丁赋予了疯狂一个全新的含义。

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jilA-ZeBUI4

    • 回复: @Realist
    , @RobinG
  14. Giuseppe 说:

    Mike put himself out there with a prediction. I once read the Late Great Planet Earth, and I lived through Y2K, so I know predictions usually fall short. So let me make one, too.

    帝国已经在叙利亚遭到殴打,我不认为另一场假旗毒气袭击即将发生。 那种刺耳的声音只能奏效很多次。 而且为时已晚。 此外,在帝国衰落的同时,俄罗斯正在变得强大。 帝国需要的是附近的一个 90 磅的弱者来击败,在对付像俄罗斯这样的强大对手之前,获得一些帝国的魔力。 帝国需要的是委内瑞拉。

  15. Realist 说:
    @SolontoCroesus

    太多的美国人肤浅而愚蠢,从而允许控制这些温和的混蛋。

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  16. Corvinus 说:
    @Realist

    “太多的美国人既肤浅又愚蠢,从而让这些好战的混蛋得以控制。”

    实际上,它们比您想象的要聪明。 而且,如果是这样的话,那你就是在攻击大多数美国白人的性格,他们智商高,时间偏好高,至少这是精美海报在这里兜售的。 换句话说,您是种族叛徒。

    现在,假设“自古巴导弹危机以来,美国比任何时候都更接近与俄罗斯的战争”,那么我们真的无能为力,惠特尼包括在内。 这些预言他以前都做过,也没有什么结果。

    • 回复: @Realist
  17. Realist 说:
    @Corvinus

    事实上,他们比你想象的更聪明。 此外,如果是这样的话,那么您正在评估大多数智商高,喜欢时间长的白人美国人的性格,至少在这方面,精美的海报兜售了这些。 换句话说,你是一个种族叛徒。

    之前我们已经经历过这种胡言乱语,我看你仍然看不懂。
    The majority of White Americans do not have a high IQ. The average White IQ in America is 100. Only 11 percent of White Americans have an IQ above 120.

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  18. Corvinus 说:
    @Realist

    “We have been through this crap before and I see you still can’t read.”

    I am able to read clearly. You are a race traitor for noticing, Sailer-style.

    “大多数白人美国人的智商都不高。 美国的白人智商平均为100。只有11%的白人智商高于120。”

    大大高于非白人,对吗? 来自像强壮的英国人和强壮的苏格兰人这样强大的股票,你大大低估了白人做出合理政治和经济决策的智力。

    祈祷,为什么你不属于“浅薄的美国人”(假设你是美国人)? 你会形容自己“比普通熊更聪明”吗? 如何以及为什么?

  19. RobinG 说:
    @SolontoCroesus

    特朗普中央情报局提名人面临在德国的逮捕令

    欧洲宪法与人权中心国际犯罪与问责计划主任安德烈亚斯·舒勒(AndreasSchüller)谈到哈斯佩尔:“她应该受到审判,不应该被提拔。 ......“提名是美国前政府以及欧洲盟国未能将法律责任作为优先事项的结果。”

    http://www.accuracy.org/release/trump-cia-nominee-faces-possible-arrest-warrant-in-germany/

当前评论者
说:

发表评论 -


 记得 我的信息为什么?
 电子邮件回复我的评论
$
提交的评论已被许可给 Unz评论 并可以由后者自行决定在其他地方重新发布
在翻译模式下禁用评论
通过RSS订阅此评论主题 通过RSS订阅所有Mike Whitney评论