Unz评论•另类媒体选择$
美国主流媒体大都排除了有趣,重要和有争议的观点
 博客浏览保罗·格特弗里德(Paul Gottfried)档案
PC Busybodies的《 Just Deserts》
通过电子邮件将此页面发送给其他人

 记住我的信息



=>

书签 全部切换总目录添加到图书馆从图书馆中删除 • B
显示评论下一个新评论下一个新回复了解更多
回复同意/不同意/等等 更多... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
同意不同意谢谢LOL轮唱
这些按钮可将您的公开协议,异议,感谢,LOL或巨魔与所选注释一起注册。 仅对最近使用“记住我的信息”复选框保存姓名和电子邮件的频繁评论者可用,并且在任何八个小时的时间内也只能使用三次。
忽略评论者 关注评论者
搜寻文字 区分大小写  确切的词  包括评论
列表 书签

An 文章耶鲁校友杂志 by Nicole Allan, a recent alumna and an associate editor of 大西洋, explains that sixteen Yale students and graduates are bringing a suit against their educational institution for sexual discrimination. According to Allan, this suit runs parallel to other suits being brought by other prestigious universities under Title IX of the expanded Civil Rights Act, passed in 1972. According to Title IX, it is illegal to practice discrimination on the basis of gender “for any educational program receiving financial assistance.” This addendum to the 1964 Civil Rights Act has been a gold mine for trial lawyers and for women’s groups looking for actionable evidence of discriminatory treatment.

By now, as Ms. Allan suggests, the law has been expanded to cover the failure of universities to provide female students with enough emotional support. Title IX has also been invoked to punish institutions that fail to move quickly enough to address harassing speech. Since both of our national parties support such practices, it is unlikely this problem will go away in the near future.

The Yale case is for me particularly interesting since it deals with my alma mater, which is becoming the very embodiment of PC. From Allan’s account, Yale offers non-stop service for every kind of female complaint, from committees to deal with insensitive speech to a SHARE Center, which responds to accusations of sexual assault. But one should never be overly confident when talking about the sensitivities of protected minorities. “In late May the Department of Education cited Yale for underreporting sex offenses in 2001 and 2002, after an investigation sparked by a 2004 article in this magazine.” It’s gratifying to know that a throw-away magazine that I receive for my annual donation is blowing the whistle on sexist administrators.

The present Yale case has the makings of a South Park episode. About two years ago a pseudonymic coed Alison went on a date and allowed the chap with whom “she danced and made out” to escort her back to her room. Although not much occurred while saying good-bye, Alison recalled afterwards that the beau had tried to kiss her and that she was “terrified by the violence he was willing to use.” On the basis of her “alcohol-muddled memory,” Alison decided that “sexual assault” had taken place. She finally brought her grievance to the appropriate agency, but felt isolated and confused when she did so.

立即订购

Allan insists it is incorrect “that Yale does not take sexual harassment seriously.” The university has created agencies to deal with this problem and its record is perhaps better than that of other, comparable institutions, for example, Princeton, Duke, and Harvard Law School, all of which are entangled in similar suits. Nonetheless, Allan is happy that Yale is being sued. It may generate a women-friendly environment, as opposed to one “in which victims don’t feel comfortable coming forward.” Furthermore, the suit “will be productive because if nothing else, it’s made girls feel that they’re not the only ones.”

My feelings about this case are rather mixed. The suit is downright outrageous. Why should universities have to create multiple social psychology agencies for minorities to avoid being sued? Why are they expected to deal with girls who don’t like their dates and who then decide to go ballistic because of their “alcohol-muddled memory” or because of some boy’s defective good-night kiss? And why are universities required to pump young women for this information in order not to be in violation of some intrusive government directive?

I am also profoundly skeptical when in the same issue, we learn that Yale has always refused to “suppress or punish speech.” The fear of engaging in harassing speech that might offend women, blacks, and gays has had the effect of suppressing intellectual discourse. Institutions become subject to government suits by permitting minority-“hostile environments” to develop on their premises. Although the offending individual may not be sued or investigated, the employing institution is more likely to suffer that fate.

Despite my distaste for the indulgence of young women who expect universities, upon pain of government punishment, to meet all their emotional needs, I do not feel the slightest sympathy for the intended targets. Our universities and law schools have been among the loudest advocates of government-enforced Political Correctness. They have introduced their own restraints on speech and thought when the government has not moved fast enough to do so. Having spent the last forty years observing these tiresome ideologues, I am now experiencing what the Germans call “Schadenfreude,” pleasure at watching busybodies hoist on their petard. I’m delighted that the troublemakers are coming under friendly fire.

(从重新发布 美国保守党 经作者或代表的许可)
 
• 类别: 思想 •标签: 学院 
隐藏2条评论发表评论
忽略评论者...跟随Endorsed Only
修剪评论?
    []
  1. Art R. 说:

    Ah for the good ol’ days before 1969 when Yale was strictly for the boys and the closest bored coeds were way over in Poughkeepsie. Boola Boola and a Bronx cheer to Brewster Kingman or was it Kingman Brewster?

  2. I must admit to a recent bout of Schadenfreude when the University of Windsor (Ontario) got embroiled in an affirmative action debacle almost a year ago. http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2010/09/29/windsor-law-schools-carasco-fiasco-a-case-study-in-the-need-to-rein-in-human-rights-commissions/
    A minority candidate for the position of Dean of the Law School complained of racism when her application was rejected, even though the hiring comittee had discovered clear evidence of plagiarism on her part. While I applaud the justice of the committee’s decision, it was amusing to me that academics who have supported Affirmative Action for decades were now being accused of racism. They should have seen this one coming. Academics who worship at the altar of egalitarian leveling (and thus squeeze out truly qualified candidates) get what they deserve when they end up being accused of bigotry.

当前评论者
说:

发表评论-对超过两周的文章发表评论,将在质量和语气上进行更严格的判断


 记得 我的信息为什么?
 电子邮件回复我的评论
$
提交的评论已被许可给 Unz评论 并可以由后者自行决定在其他地方重新发布
在翻译模式下禁用评论
通过RSS订阅此评论主题 通过RSS订阅所有Paul Gottfried的评论