Unz评论•另类媒体选择$
美国主流媒体大都排除了有趣,重要和有争议的观点
 博客浏览保罗·克雷格·罗伯茨(Paul Craig Roberts)档案
公众被私有化和放松管制抢劫
通过电子邮件将此页面发送给其他人

 记住我的信息



=>

书签 全部切换总目录添加到图书馆从图书馆中删除 • B
显示评论下一个新评论下一个新回复了解更多
回复同意/不同意/等等 更多... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
同意不同意谢谢LOL轮唱
这些按钮可将您的公开协议,异议,感谢,LOL或巨魔与所选注释一起注册。 仅对最近使用“记住我的信息”复选框保存姓名和电子邮件的频繁评论者可用,并且在任何八个小时的时间内也只能使用三次。
忽略评论者 关注评论者
搜寻文字 区分大小写  确切的词  包括评论
列表 书签

The privatization movement and the deregulation movement have turned out to be failures.

Privatization in Britain under the Thatcher government had its origin in the belief that the absence of incentivized managers and shareholders with a stake in the bottom line resulted in nationalized companies operating inefficiently, with their losses covered by government like the big private banks’ losses today. Thatcher’s government believed that privatizing socialized firms would reduce the UK budget deficit and take pressure off the British pound.

Today privatization is a way that governments can reward cronies by giving them valuable public resources for a low price. When the UK government privatized the postal system, there were news reports that one postal property in London alone was worth the purchase price of the entire postal service.

Privatization is also a way that conservatives, who object to social pensions and national health, can stop “taxpayer support of welfare.” In the US conservatives want to privatize Social Security and Medicare. In the UK conservatives want to privatize the National Health System.

It looks like the UK Conservative government is taking a step in the direction of privatizing the national health system, one of the great social reforms in British history.https://www.rt.com/uk/333270-nhs-professionals-privatized-deloitte/

In the US there are advocates of privatizing the national forests. In some ways the forests are already privatized as private timber companies are allowed to “harvest” the trees at favorable prices, and often the government even builds the roads for them.

In the US deregulation has resulted in high prices and poor service. When airlines were regulated, they competed on service. They had spare equipment so that mechanical problems did not mean cancelled flights. Stopovers did not involve additional costs.

When AT&T had a regulated communication monopoly, the service was excellent and the price was low. Today we have a large number of unregulated local monopolies, and the prices are high. The bottom line and managerial bonuses are more important than service. Customers experience constant service interruptions. Maintenance and broadband improvements are sacrificed to executive salaries.

In the US and UK public university tuition has risen so high that the universities have in effect been privatized. When I went to college there was no such thing as student loans. In-state tuition was nominal, and colleges provided inexpensive housing and meals. Most students in state universities were residents of the state.

Many aspects of the US military have been privatized. Services that the military formerly provided in-house are now contracted out to private companies at high costs.

The case for privatization and deregulation needs to be reexamined in light of the evidence and the real reasons they are being pursued.

(从重新发布 保罗·克雷格·罗伯茨 经作者或代表的许可)
 
• 类别: 经济学 •标签: 新自由主义, 私有化 
隐藏3条评论发表评论
忽略评论者...跟随Endorsed Only
修剪评论?
    []
  1. Anonymous • 免责声明 说:

    Seriously PCR? Why stop with ending privatization? Why shouldn’t every piece of economic activity be controlled by the hyper-efficient, public-minded benevolent bureaucrats?

    Please explain why this isn’t the case based on this screed?

    Apparently, free markets and freedom in general are an anathema to sound public choices.

    If you wish real world experiences with your brand of socialism, please hop the next flight to the stellar example of your worldview in action . . . Venezuela. But I caution you to bring your own toilet paper. Seems they have a bit of a shortage.

  2. Public financing for public needs. Private financing for private needs. This is a mixed economy. The only kind that makes any sense. Idiot communists who believe in the workers paradise want everything publicly owned. Idiot capitalists who believe in the free market utopia and worship the invisible hand want to privatize everything. Beware of ideologues. They are everywhere and they are extremely stupid.

  3. tsotha 说:

    When AT&T had a regulated communication monopoly, the service was excellent and the price was low.

    When AT&T ran the show I used to pay a dollar a minute for an in-state long distance call. The service was excellent, but the price was definitely not low. We are far better served by the deregulated market. The only thing I wish we’d kept from that time is Bell Labs.

评论被关闭。

通过RSS订阅所有Paul Craig Roberts的评论