Unz评论•另类媒体选择$
美国主流媒体大都排除了有趣,重要和有争议的观点
 博客浏览保罗·克雷格·罗伯茨(Paul Craig Roberts)档案
美国十一月总统大选是否会终结世界?

书签 全部切换总目录添加到图书馆从图书馆中删除 • B
显示评论下一个新评论下一个新回复了解更多
回复同意/不同意/等等 更多... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
同意不同意谢谢LOL轮唱
这些按钮可将您的公开协议,异议,感谢,LOL或巨魔与所选注释一起注册。 仅对最近使用“记住我的信息”复选框保存姓名和电子邮件的频繁评论者可用,并且在任何八个小时的时间内也只能使用三次。
忽略评论者 关注评论者
搜寻文字 区分大小写  确切的词  包括评论
列表 书签

“近一个月来,我们一直在观察美国和北约军队在俄罗斯边境——陆上、海上和空中——的稳定集结。 自 1941 年德国入侵苏联以来,俄罗斯边境上从未有过这样的敌对军事力量的集结。”

美国著名的俄罗斯专家斯蒂芬·科恩教授(普林斯顿和纽约大学)总结道。 http://www.globalresearch.ca/russia-has-not-seen-such-amassing-of-hostile-military-forces-on-its-borders-since-1941/5526562

科恩教授问华盛顿是否在梦游并需要醒来,或者华盛顿是否已经疯了并打算开战。

佩佩·埃斯科巴 (Pepe Escobar) 建议华盛顿“小心你所希望的:俄罗斯已准备好开战。”http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article44725.htm

埃斯科巴报告说,最近兰德公司,“本质上是中央情报局的前哨基地”,得出结论说,“俄罗斯可以在短短 60 小时内占领北约,如果不是更短的话。” 在核武器和导弹系统的层面上,俄罗斯领先美国军事/安全综合体四代,后者主要以成本超支来增加利润。 美国的武器系统简直是被超越了。

尽管如此,俄罗斯最高统帅部对俄罗斯政府对华盛顿侵略的低调回应感到担忧。 将军们指责感染普京政府的“大西洋一体化主义者”。 据信该派系围绕总理德米特里·梅德韦杰夫组织,并认为俄罗斯应该向华盛顿做出让步,以便被接受为西方的一部分。 无能的俄罗斯中央银行和新自由主义经济学家是其目标是成为西方的一部分的派系的一部分,而不管其对俄罗斯从华盛顿帝国独立的影响。

斯蒂芬·科恩和前英国特工阿拉斯泰尔·克鲁克在西方几乎孤军奋战,他们注意到,俄罗斯军队和强调国家主权的政府主体正在向普京总统施压,要求消灭政府中愿意妥协的人。俄罗斯的独立以获得华盛顿的接受。http://www.huffingtonpost.com/alastair-crooke/putin-west-war_b_9991162.html

这是我自己的观点有一段时间了。 当不可靠的因素成为受威胁政府的一部分时,就不可能充分抵御外部威胁。

如果普京被迫将华盛顿的特工从他的政府中撤出,就像俄罗斯要在华盛顿的阴谋中幸存下来一样,他就不能让他们离开俄罗斯。 如果他们逃跑,他们最终将在华盛顿被用作华盛顿的俄罗斯流亡政府。 如果普京不想以叛国罪对他们进行审判,那么一种形式的全国软禁将是一个解决方案。

阿拉斯泰尔·克鲁克 (Alastair Crooke) 写道,华盛顿寻求单极霸权是错误的判断,因此,正在迫使普京加入民族主义者的阵营,他们更重视俄罗斯的主权而不是西方的接受。 华盛顿利用北约试图通过在俄罗斯陆地和海上边界上的军事集结来逼迫俄罗斯,这迫使俄罗斯对华盛顿侵略的反应做出妥协。

立即订购

不管埃斯科巴如何描述俄罗斯对西方的军事优势,俄罗斯的独立是在艰难险阻之间。 关键是美国新保守派决心称霸俄罗斯。 困难的地方是俄罗斯政府内部那些在他们的方向上比俄罗斯更西方的人。

如果特朗普成为美国总统,那么新保守派可能会停止主导美国的外交和军事政策。 如果情况确实如此,俄罗斯民族主义者可能会减轻他们对普京的压力,要求将大西洋一体化主义者从政府中除名。

如果希拉里成为美国总统,新保守主义对俄罗斯的威胁将会升级。 大西洋一体化主义者将从俄罗斯政府中除名,俄罗斯将进入全面战争状态。

记住一个毫无准备的俄罗斯对德国国防军做了什么,当时德国国防军是有史以来最强大的军队。 想象一下,一个有准备的俄罗斯会对疯狂的希拉里和无能的新保守主义者做些什么。

正如我之前所写,将俄罗斯推向战争意味着美国和欧洲的灭亡,考虑到核武器的破坏力,这很可能是地球上所有生命的灭亡。

造成这种危险的主要原因是美国新保守主义者的傲慢、狂妄和愚蠢,他们在权力和影响力的地位以及希拉里的总统竞选中。 次要原因是欧洲的附庸地位,这剥夺了欧洲明智的外交政策,并迫使欧洲支持华盛顿的侵略。

这意味着无论你怎么看特朗普,如果你投票给希拉里,你肯定是在投票给世界末日。

(从重新发布 保罗·克雷格·罗伯茨 经作者或代表的许可)
 
• 类别: 对外政策, 思想 •标签: 2016选举, 新保守主义者, 俄罗斯 
隐藏13条评论发表评论
忽略评论者...跟随Endorsed Only
修剪评论?
    []
  1. This is a serious issue. As has been reported elsewhere, the Clintons’ Kosovo effort is now known to have put a corrupt regime of organ snatchers into power while the Clintons are venerated as the founding enablers of this regime. Hillary, as the chief spearhead of the Libya overthrow, a war crime and crime against humanity, should be facing international justice, not being crowned as the new queen of a “Democratic” party which has sunk into a mire of militaristic corruption. Hillary’s role in Honduras is also odious. Meanwhile, advocating a no-fly zone to defend terrorists, is beyond lunacy. If Trump effectively brings out these issues, he should derail the Clinton machine, especially since, in the last 40 years or so, the democratic voters have tended to be the less militaristic element.

    • 回复: @woodNfish
  2. “Russia could overrun NATO in a mere 60 hours, if not less.”

    That is severely optimistic … the bad roads in the east would slow them down and the Stau and Baustellen on the German Autobahns would stop them dead.

    “Remember what an unprepared Russia did to the German Wehrmacht, at that time the most powerful army ever assembled. ”

    Just to be technically correct, the unprepared Soviet Army gave up lots of ground and troops while they fell back to regroup.

  3. “…if you vote for Hillary, you are definitely voting for the end of the world.”

    Please consider an alternative position on this issue. If there were a global thermonuclear war, enough cities, people, and materiel would be destroyed that global warming (which is a certain path to the end of the world) may be checked for a couple of generations. This may give time for the forests to grow back, some of the CO2 to be reabsorbed, the fossil fuels to be left in the ground where they can’t do any harm.

    The coral reefs (breeding grounds for many fish species) would be allowed to just hang on by their fingernails as ocean acidification halted.

    The only thing that can save this planet is the total destruction of industrial civilization. A nuclear war with Russia may in fact be the Hand of God manifesting itself in its mysterious way. This is a very outrageous view, is it not, Mr. Roberts?

    I welcome the outrageous objections of the League of Opinionated Non-scientists, so well represented on this website.

    • 回复: @Ed
    , @dc.sunsets
  4. Marcus 说:

    considering the destructive power of nuclear weapons, most likely of all life on earth.

    No, communist sympathizers Sagan et al grossly exaggerated the nuclear winter

  5. woodNfish 说:

    This is where I have a problem with Paul Roberts who seems to think every bit of Russian propaganda is true, but thinks just the opposite of ours. His two links in the post as sources are Russian propagandists, so nothing they write has any value. It is just posturing.

    Personally, I think Roberts just writes some of this crap as clickbait because he is getting paid by the click. It pretty much destroys his credibility as an objective observer too. Welcome to Paul Roberts independent LSM hack.

    You can join Unz in the liars penalty box, Roberts.

    • 回复: @anonymous
  6. woodNfish 说:
    @exiled off mainstreet

    … especially since, in the last 40 years or so, the democratic voters have tended to be the less militaristic element.

    废话。

  7. Ed 说:
    @Eustace Tilley (not)

    I thought of the argument not Eustace Tilley, but thought it better not to post it. Given a) how many global warming deniers hang out here, b) we really don’t know how bad the ecological crisis will get, c) there is always a danger of nuclear war but again no telling how close we really are (though this article and Giraldi’s are alarming) and d) though its perfectly logical, there is something monstrous about wanting or even noting that massive amounts of deaths will prevent even more massive amounts of deaths, I thought it better to not raise the point.

    However, there is a related issue that is worth considering. Elites in the West go to conferences discussing climate change all the time. And if you keep pace with the research, the gist really is that the damage may get to the point that humans won’t be able to exist in the transformed environment. Regardless of whether this is correct, if you really believe this, you will be willing to take more risks in something like starting World War III. What would it matter if there will be mass deaths anyway as the environment deteriorates?

  8. anonymous • 免责声明 说:
    @woodNfish

    There are few certainties in life, but one is that nobody cares what woodNfish thinks.

  9. woodNfish 说:

    Apparently you care enough to make a stupid reply.

  10. I don’t know who the decision makers are in the Anglo/Zio Empire but I doubt their number includes the President. The American President is an overseer. Given the record it is clear that said decision makers are psychopathic killers. So yes. If current anonymous psychos remain in control nuclear war seem quite possible. Could a person who is not owned (maybe Trump) be elected President and drive the lunatics from power? I doubt it. Wouldn’t they simply kill him?

  11. dc.sunsets 说:
    @Eustace Tilley (not)

    I’m glad Eustace knows the outcome of an unlimited nuclear war; it’s critical that those who are so scientifically knowledgeable about the entire planet, its atmosphere, oceans, responses to solar energy impacts like cloud formation and such are able to put my mind at ease.

    Thank heaven that prior such experts have such a reliable history such that we can all just kiss their feet and place our lives in their hands.

    Ending my sarcasm, I sincerely recognize that if not for the anonymity of these forums, such self-assured loudmouths would likely be beaten into a coma.

  12. dc.sunsets 说:

    WW 1 occurred because of stupid alliances coupled with cascades of stupid decisions leading to a conflagration no sane person intended.

    No doubt WW 3 will follow the same path, but result in billions of deaths.

    Anyone who speaks approvingly of such things is a misanthropic psychopath and thus suffers a serious shortage of Pb, to be administered with a rapidly moving “pill” about the size of a Vicodin.

评论被关闭。

通过RSS订阅所有Paul Craig Roberts的评论