Unz评论•另类媒体选择$
美国主流媒体大都排除了有趣,重要和有争议的观点
 博客浏览罗恩·保罗档案馆
华盛顿在对叙利亚的六年战争中取得了什么成就?
通过电子邮件将此页面发送给其他人

 记住我的信息



=>

书签 全部切换总目录添加到图书馆从图书馆中删除 • B
显示评论下一个新评论下一个新回复了解更多
回复同意/不同意/等等 更多... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
同意不同意谢谢LOL轮唱
这些按钮可将您的公开协议,异议,感谢,LOL或巨魔与所选注释一起注册。 仅对最近使用“记住我的信息”复选框保存姓名和电子邮件的频繁评论者可用,并且在任何八个小时的时间内也只能使用三次。
忽略评论者 关注评论者
搜寻文字 区分大小写  确切的词  包括评论
列表 书签

Now that the defeat of ISIS in Syria appears imminent, with the Syrian army clearing out some of the last ISIS strongholds in the east, Washington’s interventionists are searching for new excuses to maintain the illegal US military presence in the country. Their original rationale for intervention has long been exposed as another lie.

Remember that President Obama initially involved the US military in Iraq and Syria to “prevent genocide” of the Yazidis and promised the operation would not drift into US “boots on the ground.” That was three years ago and the US military became steadily more involved while Congress continued to dodge its Constitutional obligations. The US even built military bases in Syria despite having no permission to do so! Imagine if Syria started building military bases here in the US against our wishes.

After six years of war the Syrian government has nearly defeated ISIS and al-Qaeda and the US-backed “moderates” turned out to be either Islamist extremists or Kurdish soldiers for hire. According to a recent report, the US has shipped two billion dollars worth of weapons to fighters in Syria via eastern Europe. Much of these weapons ended up in the hands of ISIS directly, or indirectly through “moderates” taking their weapons with them while joining ISIS or al-Qaeda.

“Assad must go,” proclaimed President Obama back in 2011, as he claimed that the Syrian leader was committing genocide against his own people and that regime change was the only way to save Syrians. Then earlier this year, when eastern Aleppo was about to be liberated by the Syrian government, the neocons warned that Assad would move in and kill all the inhabitants. They warned that the population of eastern Aleppo would flee from the Syrian army. But something very different happened. According to the UN’s International Organization for Migration, 600,000 refugees returned to Syria by August. Half of the returnees went back to Aleppo, where we were told Assad was waiting to kill them.

What happened? The neocons and “humanitarian interventionists” lied. Just as they lied about Libya, Iraq, and so on.

While it was mostly ignored by the mainstream media, just this week a Christian was elected speaker of the Syrian parliament. The new speaker is a 58-year-old Orthodox Christian law graduate and member of President Assad’s Baath party.

How many Christians does our “ally” Saudi Arabia have in its parliament? Oh I forgot, Saudi Arabia has no elected parliament.

Why does it seem that US policy in the Middle East always hurts Christians the most? In Iraq, Christians suffered disproportionately from the 2003 US invasion. In fact there are hardly any Christians left. Why aren’t more US Christian groups demanding that the US get out of the Middle East?

The US is not about to leave on its own. With ISIS all but defeated in Syria, many in Washington are calling for the US military to continue its illegal occupation of parts of the country to protect against Iranian influence! Of course before the US military actions in Iraq and Syria there was far less Iranian influence in the region! So US foreign interventionism is producing new problems that can only be solved by more US interventionism? The military industrial complex could not have dreamed of a better scheme to rob the American people while enriching themselves!

What have we achieved in Syria? Nothing good.

(从重新发布 罗恩·保罗学院 经作者或代表的许可)
 
隐藏12条评论发表评论
忽略评论者...跟随Endorsed Only
修剪评论?
    []
  1. Mark Green 说:

    Thank you, Ron Paul, for another thoughtful article. It’s too bad that you tend to avoid acknowledging Israel’s pernicious role in Washington’s murderous policies towards Syria, Iraq, Libya and (soon) Iran. But thank you for your judicious reasonings all the same.

    Sadly, Zio-Washington is on a killing spree. This needs to be understood. You are a lonely but vital advocate of fairness and non-essential militarism. Hopefully, other political leaders will someday heed your call for non-aggression and put an end to Zio-America’s serial warfare.

  2. It achieved plenty.

    It made a total mess of Syria, nation hated by Israel.

    It bled Russia and Iran.

    It drew Saudis even closer to US and Israel, or USrael.

    US policy isn’t nation-building. It is nation-busting. And look at Syria and Libya.
    Busted real bad.

    US is like ISIS or USIS.

    • 回复: @Andrei Martyanov
    , @KA
  3. TG 说:

    What have we achieved in Syria?

    1. The right people have made a fortune from all those cost-plus defense contracts.

    2. The right people have made a fortune from all those cost-plus defense contracts. This may seem redundant with #1, but it’s such an important reason, that I decided to say it twice.

    3. The right people got to play ’47-dimensional chess’ with real lives and feel important and powerful and smart. If things went badly that just proves how hard statecraft is and how essential these establishment experts are.

    4. Even though the central Syrian government has survived – sort of – it has been greatly crippled and for the foreseeable future will only be barely trying to survive. As with Iraq and Libya etc., the ability of Syria to act strategically has been largely neutered. Call it an 80% win.

    Sounds good. Onwards to Egypt! Or wherever.

    • 同意: jacques sheete
    • 回复: @Cortes
  4. Cortes 说:
    @TG

    At #3, it’s tough for the Gods on Olympus, but somebody’s gotta do it…

  5. Why does it seem that US policy in the Middle East always hurts Christians the most? In Iraq, Christians suffered disproportionately from the 2003 US invasion. In fact there are hardly any Christians left. Why aren’t more US Christian groups demanding that the US get out of the Middle East?

    Great stuff, Dr. Paul. Besides the obvious stupidity you are pointing out, I am glad to see you show some favor toward the Christians over Moslems, as we’d really be better off with more of the former than the latter, at least in the Western world.

    I know Dr. Paul is a man with respect for the US Constitution and rule-of-law not men. As far as US citizens go, the law should be applied equally without regard to race, ethnicity, what-have-you, but we’re better off not having all the diversity we can’t handle in the first place.

  6. @Andrei Martyanov

    Russian economy is skating on thin ice.

    Even though Russia waged war on the cheap in Syria, it was still a drain to a vulnerable economy.

    • 哈哈: Andrei Martyanov
  7. Why does it seem that US policy in the Middle East always hurts Christians the most?

    Why does it seem that US policy in the World Wars hurt Christians the most?

    Why does it seem that things like this “just happened?”

    70 years ago (August 9, 1945) an all-基督教 bomber crew [with the prayers and blessings of the crew’s Lutheran and Catholic chaplains] dropped a plutonium bomb over Nagasaki City, Japan, instantly vaporizing, incinerating or otherwise annihilating tens of thousands of innocent civilians, a disproportionately large number of them Japanese 基督徒.

    具有讽刺意味的是,炸弹在上午11:02几乎直接在浦上大教堂爆炸之前, 长崎是日本最基督教的城市,巨大的大教堂是东方最大的基督教教堂。

    -Gary G. Kohls, The 70th Anniversary of the Bombing of Nagasaki, Unwelcome Truths for Church and State, Aug 2015.
    https://www.lewrockwell.com/2015/08/gary-g-kohls/the-70th-anniversary-of-the-bombing-of-nagasaki/

    • 同意: Druid
  8. eah 说:

    What does a swamp normally ‘achieve’?

  9. KA 说:
    @Priss Factor

    But Americans think that they would be a lot richer if US didn’t spend the dollars in rebuilding Afghanistan Iraq , Syria ,Libya ,and Yemen. It make them sad angry confused how those nations could be so ungrateful .

    Here lies the importance of the language . Enhanced interrogation can hide torture.Illegal Enemy Combantants can divert attention from similar roles played by America.

    Nation building can hide stealing from US tax payers and hide from the fact that those stolen dollars return to the well connected lobbyist contractors and corporate

当前评论者
说:

发表评论-对超过两周的文章发表评论,将在质量和语气上进行更严格的判断


 记得 我的信息为什么?
 电子邮件回复我的评论
$
提交的评论已被许可给 Unz评论 并可以由后者自行决定在其他地方重新发布
在翻译模式下禁用评论
通过RSS订阅此评论主题 通过RSS订阅所有Ron Paul评论