Unz评论•另类媒体选择$
美国主流媒体大都排除了有趣,重要和有争议的观点
 博客浏览山姆·弗朗西斯档案
共和党制止使用夏普顿反对民主党
通过电子邮件将此页面发送给其他人

 记住我的信息



=>

书签 全部切换总目录添加到图书馆从图书馆中删除 • B
显示评论下一个新评论下一个新回复了解更多
回复同意/不同意/等等 更多... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
同意不同意谢谢LOL轮唱
这些按钮可将您的公开协议,异议,感谢,LOL或巨魔与所选注释一起注册。 仅对最近使用“记住我的信息”复选框保存姓名和电子邮件的频繁评论者可用,并且在任何八个小时的时间内也只能使用三次。
忽略评论者 关注评论者
搜寻文字 区分大小写  确切的词  包括评论
列表 书签

You really have to feel sorry for the Stupid Party. Even when handed an opportunity to make their Democratic rivals shut up about Republican “insensitivity” and “tolerance for bigotry” and embarrass the Democrats for their own embrace of hatemongers, the Republicans still manage to blow it — mainly because they refuse to denounce anti-white hatred as the anti-white hatred it is.

All during the primary season, Democrats Al Gore and Bill Bradley thumped the leading Republican candidates because they wouldn’t repudiate the Confederate flag and because Republican George W. Bush expressed insufficient outrage about anti-Catholic sentiments associated with Bob Jones University when he spoke there.

As I suggested a few weeks ago, the way for the Republicans to counter these accusations was not to apologize for Bob Jones or their position on the Confederate flag but to go on the attack. Both Gore and Bradley were fresh from meetings with black racial demagogue Al Sharpton, and neither was in any position to trash anybody for tolerating bigotry.

Articles in the Wall Street Journal, National Review and the Weekly Standard also suggested the same tactic, and at last, these ideas seeped down to the brain cells floating inside Republican skulls. As reporter Jonathan Tilove reports in a recent article for Newhouse News Service, the Republicans are “waging a campaign to make the Rev. Al Sharpton … into a central figure in the 2000 elections.”

Republican National Committee Chairman Jim Nicholson has denounced Sharpton as an anti-Semite, and the cry has been echoed by Florida GOP Rep. Joe Scarborough, who has introduced a resolution in Congress denouncing Sharpton. “I guess on the left, if somebody makes anti-Semitic remarks in New York, they’re called a Democratic leader; if they make it in Louisiana, they’re called a Klan member,” says Scarborough, in an obvious swipe at ex-Klansman David Duke of Louisiana.

Well, the Republicans have a point. Gore and Bradley (not to mention New York Democratic senatorial candidate Hillary Clinton) remain unapologetic for their kissy-face meetings with the Rev. Al, despite his long record of vicious remarks about whites and Jews, his possible role in inciting a murderous arson attack against a white-owned Harlem clothing store and his defamations of white police officers for supposedly raping Tawana Brawley.

But the Republican tactic has backfired. What they denounce Sharpton for is almost exclusively anti-Semitism, and lo and behold, the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith, the self-appointed world’s greatest expert on who is and who is not an anti-Semite, has said that Sharpton isn’t one.

Tilove’s story quotes Myrna Shinbaum, a spokesman for the ADL, as saying, “We don’t consider Sharpton an anti-Semite.” She admits he has “some baggage,” but he “has moved away from extremism and is a major player in the Democratic Party in New York.” Yes, well, David Duke left the Ku Klux Klan, but guess what the ADL would say if Gov. Bush met with him.

In fact, Sharpton’s record of anti-Semitic utterances is well-documented, but since the ADL, itself a liberal organization, won’t support the Republican case against Sharpton, and since former New York Mayor Ed Koch, himself Jewish, actually set up the meeting between Bradley and Sharpton also says Sharpton’s “support is acceptable,” it may not be easy for the Republicans to make their charges stick. Indeed, Sharpton has announced a lawsuit against the RNC and Nicholson for smearing his reputation.

So the Republicans find themselves once again on the defensive. What did they do wrong? Well, mainly, they chose to go after Sharpton with the truncheon of anti-Semitism. They should have said he was simply “anti-white.”

By lobbing the anti-Semitism charge, Republicans wanted to sound liberal, since it’s mainly liberals who lob it. If you say Sharpton is anti-white, that sounds — well — racist. And that’s what Republicans don’t want to sound like more than anything else.

But the liberals, whom the Republicans do want to sound like, are far too smart to let them sound that way. Hence, no sooner had the Republicans invoked the anti-Semitism charge against Sharpton then a small legion of liberals marched out to defend the man who is, in fact, the country’s most vicious racial demagogue and charlatan.

The Republicans’ Sharpton tactic backfired because the Republicans wanted to sound like liberals and thereby sign on to the liberal monopoly of moral legitimacy rather than challenge it. They might still be able to use Sharpton against the Democrats, who have embraced him, but now they’ll have to do it by denouncing him as anti-white — even if saying so makes them sound less — or more — than liberal.

(从重新发布 市政厅 经作者或代表的许可)
 
• 类别: 种族/民族 •标签: Al Sharpton, 共和党 
当前评论者
说:

发表评论-对超过两周的文章发表评论,将在质量和语气上进行更严格的判断


 记得 我的信息为什么?
 电子邮件回复我的评论
$
提交的评论已被许可给 Unz评论 并可以由后者自行决定在其他地方重新发布
在翻译模式下禁用评论
通过RSS订阅此评论主题 通过RSS订阅所有Sam Francis评论