Unz评论•另类媒体选择$
美国主流媒体大都排除了有趣,重要和有争议的观点
 博客浏览山姆·弗朗西斯档案
警察应该执行法律吗?

书签 全部切换总目录添加到图书馆从图书馆中删除 • B
显示评论下一个新评论下一个新回复了解更多
回复同意/不同意/等等 更多... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
同意不同意谢谢LOL轮唱
这些按钮可将您的公开协议,异议,感谢,LOL或巨魔与所选注释一起注册。 仅对最近使用“记住我的信息”复选框保存姓名和电子邮件的频繁评论者可用,并且在任何八个小时的时间内也只能使用三次。
忽略评论者 关注评论者
搜寻文字 区分大小写  确切的词  包括评论
列表 书签

The main split in the Bush administration this week seems not to be the widely publicized one between the faction around Colin Powell at the State Department and Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz at the Pentagon over whether to invade Iraq this week or next week, but rather between the White House and the Justice Department over a far more mundane question of law enforcement.

Quite simply, Justice thinks local cops should enforce the law; the White House doesn’t.

Less simply, the split is between Justice Department officials, apparently including Attorney General John Ashcroft, who want state and local law enforcement agencies to 帮忙 enforcing federal laws against illegal immigration, mainly for counter-terrorist reasons, and the Bush White House, which thinks the locals ought not to be involved in what is properly a federal law enforcement function. The Department has drawn up a document 声明 that state and local cops have authority to track down illegals; the White House is against acknowledging such authority.

Behind the disagreement is less than meets the eye: not so much different views of constitutional authority or anything quite as inflated, but simply issues of administration and politics. Justice simply doesn’t have enough people to track down, round up and adequately investigate the 数百万非法外星人 in this country who may or may not be connected to terrorist activities, so it would like the locals to help out a bit.

The locals, however, don’t always want to help out. As the “纽约时报” reports on the split among the Bushites, “Many police departments have voiced concern that the new Justice Department proposal would jeopardize their relations with immigrants, who would be less willing to report crimes.” “This is a democracy, based on freedom, and people have a right to basic human dignity,” whines John R. Robertson, [[电子邮件保护]] chief of police in Newark, Calif. “That means they’re not going to be questioned just because of their appearance.”

[纽约时报 2002 年 4 月 29 日 Administration Split on Local Role in Terror Fight ]

Of course, the cops can question suspected illegals on any basis they please, but it’s sheer pretense to claim that illegal aliens from Latin America don’t usually look like Latin Americans. If this is “种族貌相,” so what? As for jeopardizing relations with immigrants, how about jeopardizing the security of the country? That’s what local cops do when they refuse to enforce federal laws against immigrants who are here illegally. Police bureaucrats like Chief Robertson might learn a bit more about “democracy” if the communities they’re supposed to be protecting booted them out of their jobs.

The Bush administration, of course, is less concerned about all the babble about “racial profiling,” “alienating Mexico” and similar excuses for not supporting the Justice Department’s policy than it is with—you could never guess—the 西班牙裔投票。 作为 还报告,

“One senior administration official said that unless modified significantly, the proposal could lead to racial profiling and lawsuits resulting from police abuses, strain relations with Latin American nations and alienate Hispanic voters who Republicans are courting for the midterm elections in November.”

So much for the “war on terrorism.”

The administration is entirely willing to blast Afghan villagers to splinters and threaten war against whatever imaginary “axis of evil” its speech writers can concoct, but when it comes to taking elementary measures inside this country to secure our borders and apprehend illegal aliens, it 拒绝让步。

Put bluntly, the administration can’t take a pit stop without first pondering the political implications and how it might exploit the situation to pander even more.

There is every obvious reason for local and state police to arrest suspected illegals, even without the terrorist threat that continues to loom over the nation’s head. Just because violation of the immigration laws is a federal offense doesn’t mean locals can’t arrest people who commit it. Bank robbing and kidnapping are also federal offenses. Would the Bush White House seriously claim that local police shouldn’t stop bank robbers and kidnappers if they have the chance?

“If these people are in violation of the law,” Jim Pasco, executive director of the 警察兄弟会,告诉了 , “then state, local and federal police have an obligation to move against violators of immigration law.=

What the policy conflict inside the bowels of the Bush government tells us is that there is no “war on terrorism” at all if such a war threatens to curb the flow of illegals essential for 廉价劳动力 and cheap votes.

It’s just as well for the security of the country that 乌萨马·本·拉丹 and his brood don’t hail from 墨西哥 or some other neighboring country that supplies the labor and the votes the administration and its cronies crave.

If they did, the White House might be suggesting plausible reasons why we really didn’t need the 世界贸易中心 反正。

(从重新发布 威达 经作者或代表的许可)
 
• 类别: 种族/民族 •标签: 移民与签证, 恐怖主义 
当前评论者
说:

发表评论-对超过两周的文章发表评论,将在质量和语气上进行更严格的判断


 记得 我的信息为什么?
 电子邮件回复我的评论
$
提交的评论已被许可给 Unz评论 并可以由后者自行决定在其他地方重新发布
在翻译模式下禁用评论
通过RSS订阅此评论主题 通过RSS订阅所有Sam Francis评论