Unz评论•另类媒体选择$
美国主流媒体大都排除了有趣,重要和有争议的观点
 博客浏览汤姆·恩格哈特(Tom Engelhardt)档案
大卫布罗姆维奇:奥巴马想成为的领袖以及他的成就

书签 全部切换总目录添加到图书馆从图书馆中删除 • B
显示评论下一个新评论下一个新回复了解更多
回复同意/不同意/等等 更多... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
同意不同意谢谢LOL轮唱
这些按钮可将您的公开协议,异议,感谢,LOL或巨魔与所选注释一起注册。 仅对最近使用“记住我的信息”复选框保存姓名和电子邮件的频繁评论者可用,并且在任何八个小时的时间内也只能使用三次。
忽略评论者 关注评论者
搜寻文字 区分大小写  确切的词  包括评论
列表 书签

Doesn’t this just say it all? After Majority Leader Harry Reid went the ultimate mile for the president, loosing the “核选择” on the Senate to wipe out Republican filibusters of a bevy of log-jammed presidential nominations, and after the Republicans — the president’s proudly disloyal opposition — had fumed to their hearts’ content, Obama still 无法得到 his nominee to head the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division confirmed. The culprits in a Congress where, from the White House point of view, evil has been every shade of Republican turned out to be seven disloyal Democrats. Despite a “sustained closed-door effort” by Obama and his aides, they voted the nominee down. Think of it as a little parable for the Obama presidency.

Meanwhile, in foreign policy, the din has been thunderous when it comes to Vladimir Putin and events in Ukraine. Denunciations of the Russian president have rung from every quarter in Washington. Sanctions against individual Russians have been issued with broader sanctions threatened and Secretary of State 约翰·克里 has led the way. But so far it’s been a Charge of the Lite Brigade. Kerry actually had the chutzpah to say of the Russian troops sent into the Crimea, “You just don’t in the twenty-first century behave in nineteenth-century fashion by invading another country on [a] completely trumped up pretext.” And the former senator, who had for the invasion of Iraq (to deal with Saddam Hussein’s nonexistent weapons of mass destruction program), did it straight-faced. Had the situation not been so grim, it would have been pure stand-up.

The poor people of Ukraine are, of course, caught in the ring with global heavyweights and wannabes. And the action’s been hot and heavy. For one thing, the White House seems to have leaked German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s private suggestion to the president that, in a conversation they had, Putin had been “在另一个世界” — i.e. deranged. (It was assumedly a good way for the White House to depth charge her relationship with the Russian president.) As for Putin, if he’s crazy, by all accounts he’s crazy like a fox. He’s managed to go to “war” with what’s left of the Red Army and as the leader of a far more ramshackle state than the Soviet Union without a shot so far being fired. He’s been punching visibly above his weight.

Thematically true to the Obama era, Washington has no less visibly been punching below its weight. Its theme, widely announced, has been to “隔离” Russia, particularly economically. Even as Republican congressional representatives were clambering aboard the Good Ship Sanctions (while continuing to 谴责 the president), the Obama administration hasn’t been able to rally those who actually matter: its European allies.

立即订购

Yes, they’ve all said the right words in the rhetorical war that’s been underway, but in a fashion new in the trans-Atlantic relationship, even Great Britain has balked at Washington’s urgings to impose real sanctions on the Russians. And no wonder: unlike the U.S., the 德国 和其他人有 significant trade relationships with that country and rely on it for natural gas supplies, none of which are they eager to imperil. Here, too, for all the sound and fury signifying little, Obama seems to have been trumped by Putin.

The president’s inability to get much of significance done, no matter the topic, has become legendary. In this, he may be the perfect symbol of our age. His is a presidency in a time of decline. As TomDispatch定期 David Bromwich indicates today in a sweeping character portrait of the man we’ve never quite come to know, he’s had an uncanny knack for embodying the waning of American power. Whether at home or abroad, it seems as if that power is somehow mysteriously draining out of Washington. As Bromwich suggests, the president’s words can still soar, but the actions he proposes show a remarkably consistent inability to leave the ground.

  • 语音
    奥巴马如何成为总统的公关人员(而不是总统)
    David Bromwich • March 9, 2014 • 4,100 Words
(从重新发布 TomDispatch 经作者或代表的许可)
 
• 类别: 思想 •标签: 美国总统奥巴马 
隐藏2条评论发表评论
忽略评论者...跟随Endorsed Only
修剪评论?
    []
  1. Obama was groomed by the CIA and other hidden electors long before it was decided he would become president. It is written all over his dossier. He is NOT from Chicago in any way shape or manner. If commentators have not figured that much out at least, there’s not much for it in the way of serious discussion.

    Moreover, this type of grooming and vetting is standard procedure. There are NO surprise “presidents”.

    You don’t seriously think Carter came out of a peanut farm, do you?

    One sure thing–the next one, Republican or Democrat, will be worse than the last, which was worse than the last, which was worse than the last, und so weiter.

  2. Tom, have you been channeling McCain? This sounds remarkably like a complaint that America is weak because of Obama’s lack of aggressive enough world leadership.

    Rather, his embrace of status quo policies of overreaching expanded during the Cheney era (now there was someone who really led from behind) is responsible for the appearance of weakness. Unrealistic policies of “Full Spectrum Dominance” over everyone else in the world are inevitably doomed. The “weakness” is intrinsic to the policies themselves, which no imperium has ever managed to achieve. A final and complete one world order administered by and for one nation is beyond the “strength” of any to achieve.

    By the happy accident of a Hawaiian birth, the President can be the Exceptional American signing off on foreign Kill Lists instead of being among those on the drone receiving end. This just shows it doesn’t matter much the ethnicity of who gets to preside over the status quo power lunch of, if not “the smartest guys in the room,” at least the wealthiest dumb special interests in our country.

当前评论者
说:

发表评论-对超过两周的文章发表评论,将在质量和语气上进行更严格的判断


 记得 我的信息为什么?
 电子邮件回复我的评论
$
提交的评论已被许可给 Unz评论 并可以由后者自行决定在其他地方重新发布
在翻译模式下禁用评论
通过RSS订阅此评论主题 通过RSS订阅所有Tom Engelhardt评论
个人方面 古典文学
二十一世纪美国八项杰出的(愚蠢的)成就
安全国的保密狂热将如何创造您
单一超级大国时代的妄想思维