Unz评论•另类媒体选择$
美国主流媒体大都排除了有趣,重要和有争议的观点
 博客浏览Saker档案
美国对委内瑞拉的侵略是一种诊断工具
通过电子邮件将此页面发送给其他人

 记住我的信息



=>
美味 相信那张脸吗?

书签 全部切换总目录添加到图书馆从图书馆中删除 • B
显示评论下一个新评论下一个新回复了解更多
回复同意/不同意/等等 更多... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
同意不同意谢谢LOL轮唱
这些按钮可将您的公开协议,异议,感谢,LOL或巨魔与所选注释一起注册。 仅对最近使用“记住我的信息”复选框保存姓名和电子邮件的频繁评论者可用,并且在任何八个小时的时间内也只能使用三次。
忽略评论者 关注评论者
搜寻文字 区分大小写  确切的词  包括评论
列表 书签

Neocons永不停息,令他们惊叹不已,他们与委内瑞拉的最新绝技属于这一奇异事件类别,这绝对是不可想象的,同时也是绝对可预测的。 这种明显的逻辑矛盾是世界观和思维定势的直接结果,我相信这是新保守主义者所独有的:帝国自大和无限傲慢的混合,完全缺乏礼仪,对整个人类的完全蔑视,无知的愚昧,自恋者/社会变态者无法有任何同情心,也无法想象另一个人的反应,最后,最后但也是最重要的是,是愚蠢的愚蠢。 关于美国对委内瑞拉的最新侵略,可以说太多了,因此可以(并且将要)写出整本书,但是我想从一些具体但仍然非常有症状的方面开始:

“面对你”是愚蠢的还是像训练营一样的蓄意羞辱?

还记得当博尔顿被任命为国家安全顾问时几乎所有的恐怖反应吗? 好吧,显然,新保守主义者完全错过了这一点,我对此表示怀疑,或者他们做了他们一直以来所做的事情,并决定从仓库中找回艾略特·艾布拉姆斯,并任命他为委内瑞拉美国特使,以加倍努力。 我的意思是,是的,当然,新保守派非常愚蠢和社交,根本不在乎别人,但是在这种情况下,我认为我们正在处理“骷髅策略”:做的事情如此荒谬,愚蠢和令人反感,以至于把所有东西都放在首位。在做出明确选择之前先做您的附庸:要么像您没有注意到的那样提交并假装,要么不敢对Shmuel叔叔(Neocon版本的Sam叔叔)的愤怒say之以鼻。 它以“团结”或其他形式的名义发挥了作用,尽管不言而喻的事实是,帝国主义最忠实的小伙子们立即落后于美国最近一次对主权国家的侵略,但事实证明,这种侵略违反了美国的每一封信。国际法最神圣的原则。 这与他们在基础培训期间用牙刷清洁马桶或在泥泞中俯卧撑时的策略完全相同:不仅要让您完全服从,而且要让您公开放弃任何有尊严的表象。

玛格? 真的吗?
玛格? 真的吗?

但是,这不仅是历史像闹剧一样重演。 很难夸大像Elliott Abrams这样的角色对于每个想起美国在尼加拉瓜的血腥惨案的拉丁美洲人的进攻性。 现在,美国的附庸国必须在自己的人民面前放弃任何类型的假装尊严,并表现出艾布拉姆斯是一个受人尊敬和理智的人。

我认为,这种“通过屈辱的服从条件”不仅是新保守派是白痴的情况,而且是一种故意的策略,这种策略当然会适得其反,最终伤害全世界的美国p(就像亲美的一样)。由于俄罗斯舆论与美国对俄罗斯的政策(特别是在乌克兰的政策)相关联,俄罗斯的“自由”反对派被剔除。

最后,这些任命还表明,由于在美国仍然有很多非常锋利的初级新民党人可供选择,因此高级新民党人感到恐惧和偏执,但他们认为有必要从保护中获取艾布拉姆斯并将其置于关键地位尽管从他身上散发出萘的强烈气味,但仍保持姿势。 这让我想起了在最停滞的年代苏联政治局的老总,他们不得不任命切尔年科之类的人担任最高职位。

MAGA先生的政府与已故的Brezhevian政治局的共同点是,它完全无能为力。 我的妻子将白宫(自杜比亚上台以来)中的人们称为“不能直射的帮派”而且她是对的(她一直都是!):他们真的再也做不了任何事情-他们半途而废的伪成功不可避免地伴随着令人尴尬的失败。

正如我在文章中写道:有关特朗普总统任期的好消息:愚蠢可能是件好事!这些人只会促成盎格鲁犹太复国帝国的崩溃,这是一件非常好的事情。 当然,不好的是,新保守派正在排除一切可能会逐渐,分阶段,崩溃的机会,而是在创造一种动态变化的机会。 突然的,灾难性的崩溃 变得更有可能。

现在,我们所有人都看到了博尔顿的最新滑稽动作:出现一个黄色垫子,上面写着“ 5,000哥伦比亚士兵”。 再说一次,这可能是博尔顿衰老或不该死的情况,但我对此表示怀疑。 我认为这只是以美国为首的入侵威胁委内瑞拉的另一种非常微妙的方式。 而且,真的,为什么不呢?

如果帝国认为自己有权决定委内瑞拉总统的身份,那么它就必须在逻辑上以威胁来支持这一立场,特别是因为没有美国的道德或其他权威。

这里最明显的问题是委内瑞拉将如何收到这种威胁,而这在很大程度上取决于该威胁的可信度。 现在,“ 5,000名士兵”可能意味着任何事情,从步兵旅战斗队到典型的美国混合部队,其中包括尽可能多的推定“特种”部队(使每项服务感到高兴,并使每个人都能获得期望的一部分(但从未实现) )“胜利派” –美国的许多职业都取决于这种东西。 在这一点上,我宁愿不去推测,也不了解如何构造这种力量。 让我们假设这将是一支整体可信且结构合理的部队,并尝试推测委内瑞拉人对此有何反应。

委内瑞拉军事国

在这里,我特别幸运,因为我有一位亲密且值得信赖的拉丁美洲朋友,他现在是一位退休的中校,他在委内瑞拉待了几个月,与委内瑞拉军方一起工作,我无法透露其身份,但准予他全部进入几年前,与我分享了他对委内瑞拉军队的印象。 这是他告诉我的:

军队,任何军队,始终是产生它的社会的产物,委内瑞拉也是如此。 承认委内瑞拉的经济是一团糟,而期望委内瑞拉的武装部队成为专业精神,诚实和爱国主义的光辉典范,这真是愚蠢的。 可悲的现实是非常不同的。

一方面,委内瑞拉的许多军队以及整个社会都无可救药地腐化了。 在一个经济崩溃的国家,这不足为奇。 此外,多年来查韦斯和马杜罗都进行了艰苦的战斗,从委内瑞拉军队中撤出了尽可能多的潜在叛徒和阶级敌人(按马克思主义的说法),并从“社会上亲密的”(布尔什维克的概念)要素中取代了他们。社会中较贫穷的部分。 说实话,这是部分成功的策略,这一事实可以看出,在最近的政变尝试中,委内瑞拉军队以压倒性多数支持了《委内瑞拉宪法》和马杜罗的合法性。 然而,这种忠诚通常是以专业精神为代价的,并且冒着腐败的风险,就象委内瑞拉驻美国的武官(显然是美国的特工)所看到的那样。 恐怕委内瑞拉目前的局势可能类似于盎格鲁犹太复国主义对该国战争初期的叙利亚局势,当时数十名叙利亚政府高级官员被证明是叛徒和/或美国特工。 在叙利亚,政府最终重新控制了局势,但只有在伊朗和俄罗斯的大力帮助下,并且在几乎被美国管理的塔克菲里(Takfiri)军队推翻之后,政府才重新控制了局势。

据我的朋友说,这里的好消息是委内瑞拉特种部队(陆军特种部队,丛林步兵,“ Caribe”反叛乱部队,空降部队等)的状况要好得多,而且它们可以构成核心力量抵抗入侵的力量,与共和党卫队最终在伊拉克所做的一样。 但是与伊拉克的最大区别是,在委内瑞拉,大多数人仍在支持马杜罗,任何入侵部队都应该期望遇到美国入侵该国后在伊拉克遇到的许多抵抗。 另外,雨果·查韦斯(Hugo Chavez)和各种左翼游击队之间存在着一种脆弱的停战协议,他们同意停止军事行动,但他们也保留所有武器以防万一。 这种“情况”现在已经发生,我们可以预期,美国的任何入侵都将立即引发左翼游击队的重新崛起,再加上民众的支持以及爱国委内瑞拉特种部队核心的关键作用,可以形成一支左翼游击队。 非常 危险的组合,尤其是在中长期内。

请记住,腐败的官员不喜欢战斗,尽管他们可能会协助美国入侵部队,但他们只会这样做,只要事情看起来很容易,但事情一旦向南移动(这就是总是这样)。发生在美国入侵部队上),他们将尽可能快地奔跑。 因此,尽管流行性腐败现在对于马杜罗政府来说是个问题,但一旦合法政府被推翻,对美国来说将成为一个问题。

比较必然是棘手和粗略的,但请牢记这一警告,在考虑美国入侵的可能结果时,不要以“叙利亚”为由,而以“伊拉克”为由。

委内瑞拉人民的州

这真的很关键。 雨果·查韦斯(Hugo Chavez)的改革疏远了许多委内瑞拉人,尤其是那些通过维护美国利益发家致富并成为您典型的拉丁美洲版委内瑞拉人的人。 买办 班级。 许多中产阶级也受到伤害并且很生气。 但是,这些相同的改革也使大量的穷困和贫穷的委内瑞拉人赋权,他们第一次感觉到政府代表他们的利益,并且记得在美国支持的制度下生活在赤贫之中的感觉。 这些人可能对这个政府的倒闭对他们来说意味着什么没有幻想,他们可能会为保持自己在查韦斯时代所获得的很少的权利和手段而努力奋斗,即使不一定是有能力的。 甚至有有时被称为“没有查韦斯的查维斯塔斯有人将其描述为潜在的背刺汉奸,而另一些人则将其视为查韦斯支持者的更为务实,意识形态较弱的派别,他们谴责查韦斯的失误,但不希望自己的国家成为哥伦比亚式的美国殖民地。 无论如何,雨果·查韦斯(Hugo Chavez)的亲民政策在该国留下了非常深刻的烙印,您可以预期,许多委内瑞拉人将拿起武器,抵抗美国/哥伦比亚的任何入侵。

你相信那张脸吗?
美味 相信那张脸吗?

在这里,我想我们都可以向MAGA先生表示衷心的感谢,他任命Elliott“ Iran-Contra” Abrams所做的工作比任何政府赞助的宣传都要清楚得多,直白地向委内瑞拉人民解释了对他们做些什么和为什么做的事情。

认真地说,罗恩·保罗(Ron Paul)或图尔西·加巴德(Tulsi Gabbard)谈到民主是一回事,但由帮派和精神病暴徒(例如庞培,博尔顿或艾布拉姆斯)掌管确实发出了一个信息,该信息是我们正在处理由两个人触发的平庸公路抢劫案非常粗略的考虑:

  • 首先,重新控制委内瑞拉的巨大自然资源。
  • 其次,向世界证明什米尔叔叔仍然可以, 报价捡起一个cr脚的小国家,把它扔在墙上,只是为了向世界展示我们的意思”,取消引用。
总统马克罗巴马?
总裁 宏巴马?

显而易见的问题是:1)没有人认真对待美国,因为2)自几十年来,美国就没有能力击败任何有抵抗能力的国家。 各种美国特种部队通常会率先进行入侵,每次停止冒充照相机并进行实际战斗时,都有惨烈的失败记录。 我向您保证,委内瑞拉军队中没有人会像在索马里,格林纳达,伊朗和其他地方认真研究美国FUBAR时那样在意“兰博”或“三角洲特种部队”等电影。 您也可以打赌,在安哥拉和其他地方与(非常称职的)南非特种部队打交道已有多年经验的古巴人将与委内瑞拉同事分享他们的经验。

最后但并非最不重要的一点是,委内瑞拉境内有大量武器在流通,如果任何入侵似乎成功的话,各个受欢迎的民兵和国民警卫队将很乐意将其进一步分发给当地居民。

国家 帝国及其木偶总统马克罗巴马

好吧,这里著名的“精神错乱一次又一次地重复着同一件事,期望得到不同的结果”是对美国行动的最好描述。 只需看一下以下顺序:

这一切看起来不是很无聊吗?

Neocons,老年主义者和deepstaters的这种怪异的混合真的是否真的真诚地相信,这次他们将“赢”(无论您如何定义)?

更相关的是,这种配方过去曾经奏效吗? 我要说的是,如果出于辩论的缘故,我们的目标是“恢复民主”,那么显然是“否”。 但是,如果目标是破坏一个国家,那么它确实奏效了很多次。

接下来,一些错位的希望

我收到很多电子邮件,暗示俄罗斯可能会在委内瑞拉做她在叙利亚所做的事情。 让我立即告诉您,这不会发生。 是的,委内瑞拉有很多俄罗斯人,但是“俄罗斯人不来了”。 一方面,我将永远不停地重复说俄罗斯对叙利亚的干预是很小的,即使这支小部队被证明是强大的,也确实在行动 主要作为力的乘数 为伊朗人,真主党和叙利亚政府军服务。 但是,即使部署这种很小的部队也需要俄罗斯进行大量的后勤努力,俄罗斯的军队(纯粹是防御性的)根本没有为远距离投射力量而设计。 叙利亚距离俄罗斯约1000公里。 委内瑞拉距离约10倍(!)。 是的,我知道,现在有几架Tu-160两次访问了该国,该国还有俄罗斯顾问,而委内瑞拉人则拥有一些相当不错的俄罗斯武器系统。 但这又是一场数字游戏。 数量有限的俄制战斗机(固定翼和旋翼机),防空导弹,甚至大量先进的MANPAD或突击步枪,都无法解决美国对哥伦比亚的坚定入侵。 最后,没有一个委内瑞拉人能与并愿意派出真正的战斗部队进行实际,持续的打击,以打击伊朗或真主党(外部盟友和朋友)。

接下来是地形。 是的,委内瑞拉的大部分地区都难以通行,但美军和哥伦比亚人都没有丛林经验丰富的部队。 此外,绝对没有必要入侵整个国家推翻合法政府。 为此,您只需要控制一些关键位置的一些关键设施即可。 例如,我看不到美国空军或美国海军在空战中与(很少)委内瑞拉Sukhois战斗时会浪费时间–他们只会在机库,跑道,空战管理雷达和指挥所中摧毁它们。 因此,地形不会阻止帝国压制委内瑞拉的防空,一旦这样做,您就可以预期炸弹和导弹打击的通常组合会造成混乱,破坏性的指挥和控制能力,并且基本上会破坏大部分军队。 最后,在委内瑞拉沿岸的哥伦比亚和美国海军舰艇上的美军将享有一个安全的港口,可以从该港口发起任意数量的打击。

接下来,希望俄罗斯和中国以某种方式复兴委内瑞拉经济的希望也没有根据。 首先,两个国家都没有兴趣将资金投入无底洞。 签订可能最终会产生投资回报的合同是一回事,而将钱倾倒在一个无底洞中又是另一回事(就像美国和欧洲在乌克兰发现的那样)。 其次,委内瑞拉的经济已深深地陷入美英运行的国际金融体系之内,以至于中国和俄罗斯都无能为力。 他们肯定的是,这并不是说美国的制裁,颠覆和破坏在委内瑞拉经济的崩溃中没有发挥重要作用,但是至少对查维斯塔的改革却是拙劣的(至少对俄罗斯专家而言是这样)。 ,其中很多都是太少为时太晚的案例,要使委内瑞拉经济恢复稳定将需要数年的时间。

最后,我们在这里将苹果与橙子进行比较:盎格鲁犹太裔主义者的任务是破坏委内瑞拉的经济,而中国和俄罗斯的任务至少在理论上是要拯救它。 销毁比构建容易得多,以至于整个比较在逻辑上都是有缺陷的,并且从根本上讲是不公平的。

我的意思是说,对雨果·查韦斯及其理想的支持者(我非常包括我在内)的支持者没有冒犯,但是任何去过委内瑞拉或在委内瑞拉附近的人都会告诉你,穷困的委内瑞拉人不仅在该国逃亡数量众多,但它们也有助于破坏邻国的稳定。 因此,对于委内瑞拉有关经济和社会崩溃的所有报道,我们不应有波利尼什式的观念,仅作为“美国宣传”。 令人遗憾的是,即使经常夸大,歪曲和错过查韦斯改革的所有真正成功,其中的许多事实都是真实的,因此尽管如此,马杜罗政府仍继续享受民众的持续支持。 尽管如此,总体情况仍然十分黯淡,委内瑞拉需要采取一致和正确的行动,才能从目前的困境中恢复过来。

那么还有希望吗? 是的,一点没错!

我最近向一位朋友回覆了以下内容,问我关于俄罗斯可能对委内瑞拉进行干预的消息“我自己的希望不是寄希望于委内瑞拉军队,也不寄希望于中国或俄罗斯的帮助,而是寄希望于美国人崛起的惊人能力。 归根结底,这是我们最大的盟友:美国的愚蠢,愚昧,自大和 怯懦“。

可以将目前在委内瑞拉作为美国的“政策”通过的政策视为 诊断工具.

不仅要诊断盎格鲁犹太复国主义帝国领导人的道德堕落和精神病态,而且还要诊断帝国本身的绝望和混乱的真实状态。 在奥巴马的领导下,美国尽管拥有自己的缺点和弱点,却成功地颠覆了重要的拉美国家(如巴西或阿根廷)的名单,但如今,在MAGA先生的领导下,美国甚至无法做到这一点。 我们从庞培,博尔顿和艾布拉姆斯黑帮那里看到的那种滑稽动作,其原始性令人惊讶,坦率地说,使一个所谓的“不可或缺的国家”看起来绝对荒谬。 尽管最大的引人注目的同样强烈的双曲线威胁,这些失败者已经不得不折腾好几次(这里要考虑朝鲜),但他们仍然认为,粗暴的欺凌方法可以取得成功。 他们不能。 巨大的火力无法替代大脑。

在短暂而充斥着血液的历史中,美国的行为几乎总是像一些由残酷黑帮运作的犯罪企业,但在过去,其中一些黑帮可能受过良好的教育和机智(想想詹姆斯·贝克(James Baker)在这里)。 时至今日,他们的枪支仍在徘徊(尽管处于各种失修状态),但它们却被愚昧无知的人挥舞着。 是的,无知的拿着枪的智障人员可能非常危险,但永远无法有效!

总结

目前,在其各个殖民地和附庸国的支持下,美国似乎已准备好对委内瑞拉施加死亡打击,而且,实话实说,他们也许能够做到这一点。 但是,无论付出什么代价,我的直觉都是即使面对抵抗轴心最弱的国家,它们也会再次失败。 这并不是说委内瑞拉没有遇到很多重大问题。 但是我相信,尽管处于危急状态,委内瑞拉仍将能够像叙利亚一样反弹。 毕竟,叙利亚的例子证明,有可能*抵抗*强大的入侵力量,同时成功地进行迫切需要的改革。 是的,今天的加拉加斯处于非常恶劣的状态,但阿勒颇市在其被解放之前的状况要差得多,现在准正常的生活又恢复了(与美国被解放的受灾城市拉卡相提并论,拉卡 仍然躺在废墟中)。 扬基人(使用通常的拉丁美洲表达)就像他们的以色列霸主一样:他们有毁灭性暴力的能力,但没有持久力:如果事情进展得并不快,真的很快,他们就会奔跑并将自己封锁在某个地方远离危险。 就我们而言,他们甚至可以做他们在伊拉克和阿富汗所做的事情:建立令人讨厌的巨大使馆,在他们周围建立一个特殊的区域,并在该国陷入一场血腥的内战时保持坐姿。 这样,他们可以为CNN&Co.提供“和平邻里”的画面,同时仍然声称“星条旗”仍在骄傲地飞越敌人的首都,并且“这些颜色不会散开”。 对于委内瑞拉国家来说,这将是灾难性的结果,这就是为什么我们所有人都必须在美国进一步摧毁另一个国家之前大声疾呼,以防止这种情况的发生。

希望对过去的记忆完全失败,屈辱和流血的入侵将使五角大楼的正确人员相信,将采取一切措施阻止美国代表新保守派发动另一场愚蠢和不道德的选择战争。

 
隐藏247条评论发表评论
忽略评论者...跟随Endorsed Only
修剪评论?
    []
  1. I am reminded of Pompeo’s Mideast rip recently where he “stood tall” with the bloody Sunni-Salafist dictators in Bahrain who viciously oppress the Shiite majority to the applause of the U.S. government (the US has a military base in the country). There’s no democracy in Bahrain, but like its master and sponsor, Saudi Arabia, the dictators in Bahrain have made a corrupt bargain with the Israelis which guarantees them carte blanche in continuing to tyrannize the Shiite majority. Compare US support for Bahrain with the lofty rhetoric about democracy in Venezuela. The cynicism is palpable and corrosive.

    If Maduro possessed nuclear weapons Trump’s regime change would be a non-starter, as it is in China and North Korea which have strict red lines relating to non-interference in their sovereignty. It’s why North Korea acquired nukes and why every little nation in the cross-hairs of the Neocons desires them.

    Maintaining the US garrison state in Afghanistan costs American taxpayers almost \$1 billion a week (\$45 billion a year). It wasn’t easy to obtain that statistic. The corporate media seldom report the costs of our world policing. The US government is broke and another ruinous adventure in Venezuela, in addition to instigating a horrendously destructive civil war, will raise our national debt to catastrophic proportions very pleasing to the usurers who own the paper on America.

    Trump chatters about “America First” and then is led by the nose, as the Saker observes, by odious Neocons like Abrams, Bolton and Pompeo. Trump’s intentions are good — the road to hell just happens to be paved with good intentions.

    The White House script as it is evolving in Venezuela is tailor-made to fit the worst stereotypes of “Yankee imperialism.” As in Vietnam and in Afghanistan, there is a revolutionary people’s cadre that can’t be defeated short of perpetrating genocide. Guerrilla warfare for generations will be the denouement, and to what end?

    America is broken: schools, hospitals brides and highways. Our national transit system is worthy of a banana republic. We move on high speed freight trains. Human beings generally must fly, take a bus or drive. The billionaire Koch brothers will not permit a high speed passenger train system. On we march with wars and more wars fueled by the Cryptocracy’s mouthpiece media. Next stop: Satan’s field of blood in Venezuela.

    • 回复: @Anonymous
    , @Svigor
    , @Harold Smith
  2. Ypresguy 说:

    先生
    The Gang that couldn’t shoot straight was the title of a book by Jimmy Breslin in 1970’s.
    Its about the mob in NYC. Its hilarious. Your wife will like it.

  3. Alfred 说:

    It is a great shame that people from a military background – like Chavez and Maduro – are totally ignorant as to how to run an economy. How small business becomes big and prospers. How smart people get a stake in the success of the country.

    All these cretins – like Nasser, Havez el Assad, Saddam Hussein and many others – get addicted to power and think that they can rob and steal as much as they like and that the middle classes can get stuffed. The result is obvious.

    IMHO, the right to vote in elections should only be given to those with an IQ above 100. Furthermore, there should be direct democracy without all these corrupt middlemen (i.e. politicians).

  4. yurivku 说:

    we all have to try to prevent this, by speaking out before the US further wrecks yet another country.

    Prevent this – yes, “Speaking out”/crying/screaming – no, it won’t help. It’s about time 去做 something. Or just “shut up and go out” (c) Williamson.

  5. @Alfred

    Meanwhile, the bulk of US taxes go to the MIC and the Fed so there’s no robbing and stealing going on there, right? Carry on…

    • 回复: @Johnny Rico
  6. Inevitably, perhaps someday soon, a victim of US aggression that is determined to resist by all means possible will exploit the US’s leaky borders and slip significant numbers of armed suicide “martyrs” into the US to kill people at subway stations, athletic events, music venues, etc. over and over bringing social unrest the US has never seen. There is really nothing the US can do to stop this if a determined victim/enemy decides to do it.

  7. @NoseytheDuke

    US Federal tax revenue is approximately \$3,400,000,000,000 (\$3.4 Trillion). This does not include state and local tax revenue.

    The military has been estimated on the high-side as costing around a trillion dollars.

    So please, explain your comment.

  8. The assessment of the U.S. situation has some accuracy. The situation in Argentina represents a society in severe turmoil with a significant opposition, an easy pushover despite and because of the former. The idea seems to be, “go bigger than Brazil.” That the support from allies is falling into line far faster than the failed ongoing wars outside the hemisphere means aims may be achieved if the hand is not overplayed. As observed, the Russian presence is too far away and there aren’t close territorial and ethnic issues like Ukraine to serve as impetus. The Russians don’t optic as good guys in this even discounting western Russian hyperphobia. Largely, Venezuela looks to be the author of its own disintegration and the current system unsustainable even internally. It’s becoming a problem for its neighbors.

    In general, U.S. leadership is inept and of increasingly poor judgement, a problem that didn’t begin with Trump. Yet Jingoism in the past did give a seeming boost to U.S. fortunes, so this is one might work out if the “Macro-Obama” can restore order and appeal to enough people and if lifting of sanctions provides a boost to the Venezuelan economy.

  9. @Johnny Rico

    “In US American public finance, discretionary spending is government spending implemented through an appropriations bill. This spending is an optional part of fiscal policy, in contrast to entitlement programs for which funding is mandatory and determined by the number of eligible recipients.”

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discretionary_spending

    “Discretionary spending is the part of the U.S. federal budget that Congress appropriates each year. For Fiscal Year 2019, President Trump requested \$1.305 trillion. ”

    https://www.thebalance.com/current-us-discretionary-federal-budget-and-spending-3306308

    Thus after military spending and 美联储eral entitlement programs, there is 300 billion left over for EVERYTHING else. This explains why the infrastructure is crumbling and the national debt is skyrocketing.

    The US is currently surviving fiscally only because of the dollar’s status as the world’s most used reserve currency. When that ends, the fiscal chickens will come home to roost with a vengance

    • 回复: @Johnny Rico
    , @eah
  10. Erebus 说:

    This is exactly the same tactic as when they make you clean toilets with a toothbrush or do push-ups in the mud during basic training: not only to condition you to total obedience, but to make you publicly give up any semblance of dignity.

    “2+2=5” served a similar purpose in Orwell’s 1984.

    Belief, feigned or real, in the official, patently absurd Holocaust/9/11/Skripal/Iraq’s WMDs/ ____ serves the same purpose. “Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.” Whether Voltaire really said that or not, he was right.

    I found it immediately odd that the Deep Neocons have returned like dogs to their vomit so openly, without even a half-hearted attempt to make it look like plausibly deniable. In fact, it looks like they wanted everyone to know this is an officially, in-your-face speciously contrived regime change operation. That makes my spidey sense tingle. It means they’re hiding something. What?

    One look at a map, and Venezuela’s attraction becomes obvious. Control of the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean Basin is an attractive consolation prize if you’re being shown the door in Central Asia (AF) the M.E. and the S.C.S. From there, S. America is yours for the taking, at which point “consolation prize” may understate your winnings. IOW, I’m beginning to think that Venezuela is the first step of America’s exit strategy.

    Did Erdogan’s, or Russia’s TU-160 visit, or the various non-commercial flights that have been noted between Moscow, Ankara, Havana and Caracas last month add a sense of urgency to the US’ program? I suspect they did. Russian, Turkish, or Cuban military personnel in Caracas complicates matters. The US has to accelerate the program lest Venezuela becomes another Syria, Iraq or Ukraine. The US can’t afford to lose this one and call itself an empire.

  11. @The Scalpel

    This seems like a strange response to my request.

    What exactly is “everything else” and why does it matter?

    The vagueness and metaphors aren’t doing it for me. Sorry.

    When that ends, the fiscal chickens will come home to roost with a vengance

    How is this breathless prophecy of doom worth anybody’s time?

    You might also notice that one of the links you provided shows the numbers I presented. That’s because it is where I got my numbers. Duh. You’re welcome.

    • 回复: @The Scalpel
  12. @Johnny Rico

    I’m pleased to be of help to you. Alfred stated that the leaders of Venezuela, Syria, Iraq and others were clueless about economics and also corrupt to the point that theft was rampant in those economies. His comment implied that the US was somehow different and better. My reply was to suggest that this is not the case and I offer you the following in support of that.

    “So when it comes to the trillions in unaccounted for military spending, it’s not like these are just accounting errors, there are many corresponding instances of outrageous fraud and corruption all over the place that corroborate and substantiate them. We have hundreds of examples that we will go through. It’s hard to know where to begin.”

    “The scale of the corruption is too large for the average person to comprehend.”

    “Our tax dollars have been disappearing by the Trillions, with a “t.” I mean, again, 1\$ Trillion is \$1000 billion, right, do you get that? Can you comprehend that?”

    “One thing that I’ve realized, beyond a shadow of doubt, when it comes to systemic corruption, both political parties, the Republicans and the Democrats are up to their eyes in systemic corruption, as I will point out throughout this series. When it comes to systemic corruption, it is a bi-partisan affair.”

    “The U.S. Constitution is being destroyed, it’s being torched, the checks and balances, the accountability mechanisms, the chain of accountability has been completely dismantled. And we know exactly how it is being done. We know the weak points. We know the loopholes well. We can describe the process in detail so people can understand it, and at this point, we don’t need any classified info to do it.”

    https://www.globalresearch.ca/overcoming-divide-and-conquer-propaganda-to-unite-the-american-people/5666724

    别客气。

    • 回复: @Johnny Rico
  13. Anonymous [AKA "Dialog"] 说:
    @Michael Hoffman

    迈克尔,

    Is not the formula simple ?

    If one desires worldly power one must submit to the prince of the world – satan.

    This always involves ritual humiliation, disgrace and blackmail-able behavior .

    can’t get there – power – from here, without proving 的课 可靠性。

    然后 你会 be “responsible”, “reliable”, “a safe pair of hands”

    The servile behavior of “our leaders” take no effort on their part – they 享受 the humiliation, the disgrace. They are shameless.

    一个怎么样 打败 the shameless ?

    Or should we let evil destroy itself ?

  14. Ned Ludlam 说:

    The US continues to get away with its aggression because they wield the initiative. The Russians and China are congenitally cowed and basically do little to respond. And the US sees how weak they are and it emboldens them. Russia and China can’t break out of their mind set which the Saker is victim of too. They can’t see how utterly fragile the US is, that it could sustain little in the way of shock or blows, that it is pre-fractured for collapse. If only some force would risk stepping up to the plate and giving them a really big whack.

    • 回复: @Bill
  15. I am constantly amazed at writers of these comments who talk about the economic “incompetence” of the leaders of e.g. Cuba, Syria, Venezuela and Iran, when the economies in question are being subjected to US economic “measures” which are openly intended to wreck their economies!
    在我看来, 太子港contraire that for the Cuban economy to have survived since 1959 without totally colapsing, indicates a really remarkable level of competence.

    • 同意: RobinG, byrresheim
    • 回复: @Authenticjazzman
  16. JVC 说:

    Odd isn’t it–millions of dollars being spent by a “special investigation” tasked with somehow finding evidence of Russian Interference in our “democracy” Yet our government (It has been essentially neocon lead for years) can just come out and say to Venezuela that your election did not count–the wrong person was elected, and this is the guy we decided should be in charge. Not the first time in recent decades the USG has done this very thing, but never before so open and blatant.

    Can it be anymore obvious that the USG no longer gives a damn as to what other people think of it. Have we finally just come out and told the world what we have been doing all along–disregarding any nations right of sovereignty anytime we feel like it? Or is there method to Donald’s madness, and is this action in effect a huge blow to the empire. One can only hope.

    • 回复: @Simply Simone
  17. peterAUS 说:

    The usual Saker so skim read through and, in “Conclusion”:

    ….Venezuela will be able to bounce back, just like Syria did…..

    超现实主义。

  18. @NoseytheDuke

    Nice dodge. It’s too bad you are unaware that you are spreading gibberish and misinformation. You really think you are doing something positive.

    And also, tax dollars aren’t “disappearing.” But then, you are one who believes the moon landing was faked, so…

    • 回复: @bluedog
  19. “… and yet they still think that crude bullying methods can yield success. They can’t. Immense firepower is not a substitute for brains.”

    Never underestimate the power of the giant foam fingers held aloft by a crowd chanting, “We’re number one! USA, USA!”

    Roman generals enjoying a Triumph nevertheless had someone behind them whispering, “Remember, thou art mortal.” There is no equivalent for either the neocon civilian leadership or their uniformed flag-officer poodles who, oddly enough, have learned to dress themselves much like the Latin American generals they are eager to face off.

    • 同意: Andrei Martyanov
    • 回复: @peterAUS
    , @Johann
  20. Bill 说:
    @Ned Ludlam

    I think China and Russia see that time is on their side, so they wait. I also think you forget how easy it was for US elites to convert the big whack on 9/11 into a period of jingoistic national unity.

    • 回复: @Ned Ludlam
    , @Erebus
    , @Rubicon 727
  21. bluedog 说:
    @Johnny Rico

    Of course tax dollars are disappearing when the pentagon can’t account for TRILLIONS OF TAXPAYER MONEY, or do you know where it went…

    • 回复: @Johnny Rico
    , @Carlton Meyer
    , @eah
  22. Ned Ludlam 说:
    @Bill

    With respect, those days are over. The US body politic is so bitterly divided they can’t be rallied along the Russiagate line. And the pain of debt bubbles looms. History only grants a few opportunities for the bold to assert themselves and this is one of those times. Ditch the US dollar and the edifice disintegrates. But Russia and China are paralyzed by their earlier experiences and are at risk of allowing the US elites further life to reassemble their position.

  23. peterAUS 说:
    @The Alarmist

    ..Roman generals enjoying a Triumph nevertheless had someone behind them whispering, “Remember, thou art mortal.” There is no equivalent for either the neocon civilian leadership or their uniformed flag-officer poodles …

    您可能会喜欢这里的东西。

  24. Erebus 说:
    @Bill

    I think China and Russia see that time is on their side, so they wait.

    I thought that too. The danger in that approach lies in the fact that as time advances and the US sees itself slipping further and further it will tend to become increasingly dangerous.

    In other words, time is on their side until it suddenly isn’t. The US is very likely to tip into an unacceptably dangerous stage at some point in its declining trajectory, and the Russians & Chinese will be forced to act. I doubt Venezuela is that point.

    Though I’m sure the Chinese and Russians know this, I have no idea what the Kremlin or Chinese Politburo are using to calculate the nature and timing of the US’ tipping point or of their reactions to it. That calculus is beyond my pay grade.

    Ned’s point that the US is fragile is, I believe correct, but my view is that so is the rest of the world. An “unmanaged” US collapse would lead to a period of chaotic, international re-alignment on just about every plane of international relationships, and on many domestic ones as well.

    It’s not obvious, perhaps, how deeply the US-led world order goes, but the US’ role in all of the world’s international institutions and, ipso facto, their domestic counterparts is foundational. Like a fish who doesn’t know he’s wet, nations and their peoples live in that institutional ecosystem without really noticing it. Fish don’t fair well in suddenly dry lakes.

    How much of that ecosystem collapses along with the US is also beyond my pay grade, but I suspect it’s dangerously large. Large enough, obviously, to stay the Kremlin’s and the Politburo’s hands until now.

  25. Svigor 说:

    It’s hard to suss out the actual list of grievances from your piece, what with all the heavy breathing, overwrought language, and general, womanly kvetching about how this reminds you of that irrelevant thing from the past, or that is like this totally unrelated thing, etc. So your writing doesn’t earn close reading, and I TL;DRed as usual when you started your typical fapping over irrelevant stuff like the Venezuelan military and your fantasy football take on geopolitics, but, AFAICT:

    They appointed some Jew you don’t like, and some other guy you don’t like wrote “5,000 troops to Colombia,” and they recognized the Venezuelan who started calling himself president.

    Is that about the extent of the “aggression”? Oh, wait, I’m guessing their going after CITGO got a mention too, and goes into the “aggression” column, with the assumption being that Venezuela has some Divine, God-given, inviolable right to access US markets. Right?

    FFS, why does anyone publish or read you?

    • 回复: @El Dato
    , @Uncommonground
    , @Lot
  26. Svigor 说:
    @Michael Hoffman

    我想起了

    You’re reminded of your perennial talking points, because Saker’s piece is boring and useless as fuck and isn’t worth talking about.

    Update: I scanned all the comments, and as far as I can tell, NO ONE is discussing US aggression against Venezuela. I’ve given it the most prominent mention so far.

    Fucking hilarious.

    C’mon folks, overcome your indifference to Venezuelan suffering and list the actual US aggressions, please?

  27. Svigor 说:

    Lol, I Jewgled “US aggression against Venezuela” and the top two hits were this piece. The hilarity never stops!

    P.S., I was wrong; my mention of CITGO was the first on this page. Lulz.

    • 回复: @Giuseppe
  28. Giuseppe 说:
    @Svigor

    LOL That’s because THAT search engine tracks your searches and can read your thoughts. Use duckduckgo, the search engine that won’t track you.

    • 回复: @Svigor
  29. Giuseppe 说:

    This is absolutely tip-top Saker, the military analyst telling us like it is in Venezuela. I liked it a lot because for some reason I have felt for some time that the empire’s next move as far as overt intervention would be against Venezuela and not Russia, China, Iran or North Korea. I went back through my comments and found these from last year which I think still apply.

    27月2018日, XNUMX年

    Netanyahu has been yakking (with the bomb cartoon) like that about Iran for 15 years, but Washington knows that an attack on Iran could ignite WWIII. The same goes for North Korea. It’s more likely Washington will end up picking a fight with Venezuela, a conflict thought not likely to ignite a wider war. Venezuela has no powerful friends and Venezuela is close.

    二零一七年三月:

    The empire is already beaten in Syria and I don’t think that another false flag gas attack there is in the offing. That shtick can only work so many times. And it’s just too late. Furthermore, Russia is getting stronger while the empire is weakening. What the empire needs is a 90 pound weakling in the neighborhood to beat up on, get some imperial mojo back before tackling a formidable adversary like Russia. What the empire needs is Venezuela.

  30. @JVC

    Your comment is much exactly like I think. The absurdity of the U.S. trying to overthrow the government of Venezuela while the Neocon pigs are trying to overthrow our government is right before our eyes! Can’t the public see the hypocrisy?
    Trump is being blackmailed into this action regarding Venezuela no doubt. The fact that he has a young son and grandchildren is the reason he is an easy target. His money saved him from being led by wanting riches for doing what the Neocons desired, but his family is what will keep him in check from refusing the big demands of the sinister element! An easy blackmail target is a threat to the health of his offspring and boom, he caves in like a bad souffle. Don’t doubt that those disgusting and conscienceless pigs do this all the time world wide. They kill and torture people so blackmail is the easy part.

  31. @bluedog

    I feel like the more you guys troll this stuff the the more vague you become. You more times you repeat a total absence of detail or evidence the less convincing you become.

    Didn’t you ever read any of those stories about the CIA and Petreaus’ emissaries giving suitcases of cash to various Iraqi and Afghani chieftains?

    Nobody trusts Washington or Congress or the Government. But what are you suggesting as a viable alternative?

    “Trillions”? Really? Wow. Thats sounds big.

    It is a VERY round number. Sounds like you either have no idea what you are talking about or are very aware that you are making everything you say up as you go or getting it from sources that are.

    • 回复: @bluedog
  32. Svigor 说:
    @Giuseppe

    Incorrect, DDG gives same two hits as first two results. Because keywords.

    大声笑。

  33. Svigor 说:

    I’ve actually provided the most comprehensive list of US aggression against Venezuela on this page.

    LULZ @ you flatheads. You’re so desperate for a hero, you flock to a zero.

    As for “US aggression against Venezuela,” it amounts to nothing, compared to Venezuelan aggression against Venezuela. Which is no surprise to anyone familiar with the term, 暴力事件.

    • 回复: @gepay
  34. Miggle 说:
    @Alfred

    The legislators are the decision-makers but need to make their decisions after taking the advice of the top economists, the top experts in all fields. That’s what a Public Service or Civil Service is for. Don’t expect the President to be the top economist.

    It’s a full-time job just taking that advice. And running the economy is only part of it.

    They need to start out knowing only that they know nothing.

  35. bluedog 说:
    @Johnny Rico

    A number of sources came out about the missing trillions in the Pentagon,and of course this is not the first time that money has gone down that rat hole,and of course if you can’t,refuse or if you are simply to lazy to look things up then I’m sure your hanging around the wrong place.

    • 回复: @Another Anon
  36. “一个号码”

    You are too lazy to even mention what the number is.

    • 回复: @NoseytheDuke
    , @bluedog
  37. anon[252]• 免责声明 说:

    The first UN rapporteur to visit Venezuela for 21 years has told The Independent the US sanctions on the country are illegal and could amount to “crimes against humanity” under international law.
    Former special rapporteur Alfred de Zayas, who finished his term at the UN in March, has criticized the US for engaging in “economic warfare” against Venezuela which he said is hurting the economy and killing Venezuelans.

    The comments come amid worsening tensions in the country after the US and UK have backed Juan Guaido, who appointed himself “interim president” of Venezuela as hundreds of thousands marched to support him. European leaders are calling for “free and fair” elections. Russia and Turkey remain Nicolas Maduro’s key supporters.
    联合国人权理事会 (HRC) 前秘书、国际法专家德扎亚斯先生在 XNUMX 月向人权理事会提交委内瑞拉报告后接受了《独立报》采访。 他说,自提交报告以来,联合国一直无视该报告,也没有引发他认为应得的公开辩论。
    “Sanctions kill,” he told The Independent, adding—-

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/venezuela-us-sanctions-united-nations-oil-pdvsa-a8748201.html

    When media fails to quote or deliberate on a person of authority ,knowledge and experiences in the field of enormous significance, media cease to be the 4 th pillar of democracy and the idea of freedom of expression doesn’t apply anymore to their activities. They are thugs and accomplice .

    Before 2015 there was no migration out of Venezuela .That was time when sanction started crippling the country .Sanction ‘s effects was compounded by crony nepotistsic hoarders of food and merchandises known as liberal capitalist and known to be in league with US machinery .

  38. gepay 说:
    @Svigor

    La violenca was Columbia reaction to when the US first used the “lone nut assassin” to take out the nationalistic politician Gaitan running for President.

  39. @Johnny Rico

    Johnny must be having a larf, nobody is really that stupid surely?

    The Pentagon itself has admitted that it doesn’t know the number, the treasury doesn’t know the number, nobody really knows the number, not even down to the nearest trillion. That’s the point, but by all means do keep yammering on about corruption and theft in Venezuela, Iraq and Syria. It’s not as if you have any credibility here to undermine if you do.

  40. 我的天,特朗普没有精英尊严。

    他应该任命希拉里克林顿为委内瑞拉总统。

    • 回复: @Taras77
  41. Anon[248]• 免责声明 说:

    This is pure Pence. He was the one who called Guaido and urged him to take the oath and pronounce himself “interim president”. The Pence administration is now officially running our foreign policy.

    Pence has been planning the soft coup on Trump since Day 1, but his man Mueller is taking too long, his patience is running out, he is no longer waiting for Trump to get out of the way, he’s directly calling all the shots now.

    Get ready for the most meddlesome presidency in history. The Ziocons are now fully in charged at the WH. They are wild and giddy with power, ready to set the whole world on fire.

    • 回复: @renfro
  42. Anon[248]• 免责声明 说:

    入侵世界,邀请世界。

    How many millions of Venezuelan refugees will we now have to take? Venezuela has 32 million people, with an average IQ of 84.

    • 回复: @Wally
  43. Taras77 说:
    @Backwoods Bob

    奥利诺斯不在,他正忙着监督 NRA 的枪支运行。

  44. Rumor has it this is really why America seeks to destroy Venezuela and Russia, they make awesome music and wouldn’t let Bolton join the band, said he was too crazy and scared all the groupies off, suck it Hollywood
    Maduro on the board, Putin vocals:

  45. Anon[424]• 免责声明 说:

    Quod Deus vult perdere dementat prius.

    • 回复: @Franklin Ryckaert
  46. @bluedog

    There are thousands of examples, but here is a recent one from my blog:

    Feb 2, 2019 – USAF to Reopen Unneeded Airbase

    A great example of waste and corruption in the US military is the plan to rebuild and reopen Tyndall Air Force base. The number of aircraft in the USAF has fallen nearly in half over the past 20 years, so it has far too many airbases that are expensive to operate. For example, after F-22 bases were selected only half as many F-22s were procured as planned, so all F-22 bases have ample room for more aircraft.

    Last year, Tyndall Air Force F-22 base in Florida was destroyed by a hurricane. Tyndall’s F-22s were quickly relocated to other bases. Some questioned why such expensive aircraft were based in an area with hurricanes since several F-22s undergoing maintenance were destroyed. Nevertheless, the Air Force just announced at least \$3 billion will be spent over five years to rebuild and reopen unneeded and poorly located Tyndall!

    Politics are important and the base is a mess, but the Air Force should have proposed spending a couple billion to clean up Tyndall and prepare it for industrial or other productive private sector uses. But our Congress and Pentagon are so selfish and corrupt they don’t give a damn about wasting money. Just bill the taxpayers and always blame poor readiness and accidents on a lack of funding!

    • 回复: @RobinG
  47. renfro 说:

    The US is Out of Control and I envision chaos and destruction in both Latin America and the ME.
    We are as much under occupation by the Zionist and Neocons as we were under Bush Jr in the run up to Iraq….even more so.
    There is No One in power that I can see that is trying to put the brakes on any of this.
    We underestimated the Zionist and Neocon’s ability to stovepipe fake intelligence and fool congress into war in 2003.
    Now congress doesn’t even need fooling to launch wars or invasions or ‘liberations’ or ‘install democracy’.
    Its almost pointless to waste energy commenting on it….except maybe for the historical record… since apparently there is no way short of a bloody revolution to end the corruption responsible for this insanity.

    • 同意: densa
    • 回复: @tac
  48. This is why US politicians can’t get anything done, including the main thing we elected Trump and a Republican Congress to do: https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-06-29/main-reason-congress-getting-so-little-done-they-will-have-218-days-2017

    That main thing was not a foreign policy venture. We elected them to stop illegal immigration and to reduce legal immigration to reasonable numbers.

  49. renfro 说:
    @Anon

    The Ziocons are now fully in charged at the WH. They are wild and giddy with power, ready to set the whole world on fire.

    Pence has no need to undermine Trump he can just wait. All the militant Zionist Trump brought into the WH have already done that…..and Trump let them.

    Who do you suppose Kushner has shared US secret intelligence with…Israel for sure, probably Saudi in exchange for their allying with Israel. We use to worry about spies and moles in government but now they are the government.

    Trump’s White House Has a Massive Security Problem
    Jared Kushner isn’t the only Trump official who got a special pass after security experts said he shouldn’t be allowed to access national-security secrets.

    by Tina Nguyen
    一月25,2019 11:44上午
    法新社
    The CIA took one look at Kushner’s SCI application and freaked out, calling over to the White House to find out how he even got the lower level clearance.

    [更多]

    In May, after months working under an interim clearance, Jared Kushner’s request for a permanent security clearance, which would allow him to see top-secret material, was finally granted. At the time, observers took this as an indication that Donald Trump’s son-in-law, who’d reportedly attracted Robert Mueller’s attention for his ties to various foreign entities, was in the clear.
    On Thursday, however, an NBC News report threw that conclusion into doubt. In fact, two sources familiar with the matter told the outlet, Kushner’s clearance was only approved because Trump’s handpicked director of security personnel overruled two career White House security specialists, who had recommended against Kushner receiving top-secret clearance after seeing the results of his F.B.I. background check.

    Kushner’s case represents a worrisome pattern for the White House. Per NBC, Trump’s director of security, Carl Kline, overruled security experts in at least 30 cases, recommending that Trump officials be granted clearances despite troubling information uncovered in their background checks. That number is indeed extraordinary. Prior to the Trump administration, White House security experts had only been overruled once in the past three years. (The White House told NBC, “We don’t comment on security clearances.” A C.I.A. spokesman said the same, and Kushner’s lawyer, Abbe Lowell, had “no comment.” Kline, a former Pentagon employee, could not be reached for comment.)

    Denying a security clearance to a White House official, noted Daniel Jacobson, a former lawyer in Barack Obama’s administration, is not something that’s done lightly. “It is not normal for the head of the Personal Security Office to ever overrule the career employees who adjudicate clearances,” he wrote on Twitter. “It takes some pretty bad stuff to be denied a clearance. The fact that there have been thirty denial recommendations of WH staff in the last 1.5 years is itself crazy, before you even get to the overruling part.”
    After he was cleared by the White House, Kushner’s file was reportedly submitted to the C.I.A. to be evaluated for an S.C.I., or “sensitive compartmented information” clearance—an even higher designation. It didn’t go well:
    After reviewing the file, C.I.A. officers who make clearance decisions balked, two of the people familiar with the matter said. One called over to the White House security division, wondering how Kushner got even a top-secret clearance, the sources said.
    Given his various entanglements, the C.I.A.’s alarm makes sense.

    • 回复: @renfro
    , @Carlton Meyer
  50. renfro 说:
    @renfro

    A pertinent question in the above would be who around Trump brought Kline into the WH security where he could hand out security clearances.

  51. sixten 说:

    I really don’t think they care about winning. They make huge profits even when USA loses.
    In fact, they might rather lose; that way they can start something someplace else.

  52. Wally 说:
    @Anon

    我的想法完全正确。

    Why build a wall when millions can claim and get special status & a free ride as war refugees.

    Oh those Jews First “neo-cons”.

    Jews & demand low IQ, 3rd world immigration into the US & Europe while they supports very strict Israeli immigration laws which allow JEWS ONLY.

  53. Sean 说:

    ‘The US Aggression Against Venezuela as a Diagnostic Tool’ When one has identified a country as a superpower one knows how in will act. The USA is a superpower and so is Russia. Unless one believes in American exceptionalism, from observing Russian Federation actions in Ukraine one would expect the United States of America to behave like any other superpower would when there was a hostile government in its back yard. It does not matter what kind of political or moral system a country is ostensibly guided by; what matters is whether it has power enough:-

    Athenians. When you speak of the favour of the gods, we may as fairly hope for that as yourselves; neither our pretensions nor our conduct being in any way contrary to what men believe of the gods, or practise among themselves. Of the gods we believe, and of men we know, that by a necessary law of their nature they rule wherever they can. And it is not as if we were the first to make this law, or to act upon it when made: we found it existing before us, and shall leave it to exist for ever after us; all we do is to make use of it, knowing that you and everybody else, having the same power as we have, would do the same as we do.

    https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/arts/classics/students/modules/introhist/usefuldocuments/thucydides_v.84-116.pdf

  54. renfro 说:

    But I believe that in spite of being in a critical condition, Venezuela will be able to bounce back, just like Syria did.

    No it wont bounce back without some intervention…..although I am against the US Bolton-Abrams method of intervention.
    Venezuela is dependent on its oil and production has declined to a dribble now ever since it was nationalized due to both incompetence and corruption.
    Sooooo…it has to be turned around somehow.
    The ideal solution would have been to convince them to bring in a large qualified oil production company to at least get production going and stabilize things a bit and avoid starvation and panic until elections could be held.
    I think Venezuela is desperate enough to have accepted that kind of plan and the citizens wouldn’t have objected to that.
    But instead Trump let rabid dogs Bolton and Abrams go after it.
    Both like to imagine themselves ‘masters of the universe’ so we can imagine how they will use their US power to vent their nasty spleens on Venezuela.

  55. eah 说:
    @The Scalpel

    entitlement programs for which funding is mandatory and determined by the number of eligible recipients

    Funding of ‘entitlements’ is “mandatory” only in the sense the funding is mandated by existing law - but Congress can change the law at any time (disregard the 政治 feasibility or consequences of doing so for the moment) — eg SS is just a tax: a person is not ‘entitled’ to a SS benefit payment of any particular amount, or any benefit payments whatsoever, no matter how much SS tax he has paid over his lifetime — the courts have ruled definitively on this several times — this is the ‘dirty little secret’ of all ‘entitlements’.

    • 回复: @Jeff Davis
  56. Miro23 说:

    可以将目前在委内瑞拉作为美国的“政策”通过的政策视为 诊断工具。

    The attack on Venezuela is also a diagnosis of which countries are client states of the Zio-Glob:

    IMPERIAL POSSESSIONS

    – The Anglo world (Britain, Canada, Australia)
    – The European Union (Germany, France etc.)
    – The South American comprador states (Brazil, Argentina, Chile, Colombia)

    独立

    –俄罗斯
    –中国
    –伊朗
    – South American states without comprador elites (Bolivia, Cuba, Mexico, Uruguay)

    Interestingly, the first three, are all currently being threatened by the United States.

  57. eah 说:
    @bluedog

    tax dollars are disappearing

    Since both the Fed and your local bank create money from nothing (when you take out a loan they just credit your account with the loan amount), I’m less worried about “disappearing” tax money than I am about misallocated spending and its consequences — eg the ‘black budget’ of the NSA and ‘deep state’ generally.

    • 回复: @cassandra
  58. The elephant in the room is that Putin is bogging himself down in yet another fight. Bogged down in Crimea, bogged down in the Donbas, bogged down in Syria, he’s now bogging himself down in Venezuela. Amusingly, one of the arguments that his American supporters used to justify his invasion of Ukraine was to say “what would the US do if Putin put missiles on America’s doorstep”. Now, he seems to be doing precisely that! Let’s see what the US does!

    • 回复: @Sir Launcelot Canning
    , @tac
  59. Anon[424]• 免责声明 说:

    https://russia-insider.com/en/coming-us-china-proxy-war-venezuela/ri26145

    lots of money in the air in Venezuela , things could get very nasty . I just hope that there will not be a civil war .

  60. @bluedog

    As much as I support the notion that the Pentagon is awash in corruption, the media reports about missing trillions are incorrect and the result of either deliberate misrepresentation or (more likely) the lack of competence on the part of those reporting to comprehend complicated material.

    The reports originated from the recent audit work done on the Pentagon. I’m not sure exactly how long a period this covered (and to be honest, can’t be bothered to look it up right now) but it was a 10-20 year period.
    Included in the preliminary reports was the unaccounted for adjustments totaling up to several trillions of dollars. Here’s the thing most people reporting on this fail to grasp, adjustments are not expenditures. There a bookkeeping gimmick to balance the books.
    The debit and credit side need to be balanced out. This is what adjustments do. They balance the books. But as they can appear on either the credit or the debit side and on both sides at the same time, they can be used to artificially inflate the books (to make a company look more valuable than it is) or to hide real expenses. More likely in the case of the Pentagon, due to systemic failures of accurately forecasting (real) expenditures, inability to stick to budgets and ignoring (at least some) of the financial paperwork needed to satisfy the accountant, they had to make numerous adjustments all over the place to balance their books.

    In addition, it is highly likely that these trillions include the same adjustment multiple times, not because ‘it’ (what ever it is) happened multiple times, but because it is included in the books of each level in the Pentagon hierarchy that reports its finances independently.
    For example, a specific ship in the Navy spends more on their operational cruise than it should have. This means adjustments on its financial report. The fleet it belongs to also has to adjust its books. The US Navy also has to include the adjustment and ultimately the overall Pentagon books will include it too. The same adjustment reported multiple times.
    It also works if the ship spends LESS than was budgeted for. A surplus also requires an adjustment in the books with the same result as above.

    Last (purely theoretical) example; let’s say you have 3 companies. You put \$ 1 million in company A.
    You transfer this in batches to company B. You put in the books (of company A) as ‘reservations’, ie money to be spend later. When this comes into company B, you put it in the books as ‘investments’ ie implying the money is to used by company B for expenditures. Again you transfer this in batches, this time to company C, again as ‘reservations’. You book them as ‘investments’ in company C and guess what, you then transfer these into company A as ‘reservations’.
    Company A now has an additional \$ 1M coming into it which you label ‘investments’. The value of company A now appears to be \$ 2M (\$ 1M investments from company C and \$ 1M in reservations) as it it not evident from the books of ONLY company A that it is the same \$ 1M. You need to see all of the books to make sense of what is happening, in this case to distinguish between what are real revenue and expenses and what is just pumping around of the same money.

    Now add numerous different ‘companies’ with their own books and stupendous amounts of transfers between them. That in a nutshell is not just the Pentagon but the whole US financial economy.

    Note for the accountants out there, I know, the last example is extremely simplified. It merely serves to illustrate the subject in an easily understood manner.

  61. Justsaying 说:

    The lies from our “leaders” are getting more shameless, blatant and evil. If Maduro’s election “rigging” is the pretext for targeting yet another country for destruction and wanton aggression, an election was indeed held and its results upheld until the US thugs decide otherwise. What of our nomadic allies, head choppers and absolute monarchs — Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, and the seven UAE fiefdoms or “emirs” as they are ostensibly known? Elections are not even allowed, let alone being held. And where some semblance of them does take place as in Bahrain, the Shias who constitute the majority are always sidelined and their leaders incarcerated. Egypt is of course a special case: Al Sisi, Egypt’s murderous thug and our close ally, garners a cool ‘97% of the electoral vote”, 1 million of which (spoiled) went to the popular Premier League footballer, Mohamed Salah. The votes cast for Salah were protest votes for an athlete who was not even a candidate. Many opposition candidates were barred from participating and some jailed. Not a word from our own “freedom” loving thugs leading this country and their servile, despicable “free” press. When, oh when, are we going to rise against the murderous thugs running our government and embezzling trillions of our tax dollars in the service of Anglo-Zionism and the MIC?

  62. “….In its short and blood-soaked history, the US has pretty much always acted like some criminal enterprise run by brutal gangsters,…”

    Well, that’s because that is exactly what it is, which makes it no different from any other government, past, present, or future, including the Venezuelan government.

    As I’ve said here and elsewhere:

    “由于它们最终都通过直接和间接盗窃(税收)和伪造(中央银行垄断)获得资金,因此,所有政府从本质上来说都是100%的腐败犯罪骗局,无法对其进行“改革”,“改善”。 ,也不是仅仅因为其固有的犯罪性质就“限制”了其范围。”

    Until people come to understand the true fundamental nature of all governments, humanity will be lost.

    Without an understanding of that true, fundamental nature, any/all solutions to the problems they see will ultimately fail, no matter who is in charge and no matter what grand new scheme to save us they propose to coerce everyone into going along with, because, ultimately, there are, and can be, NO government solutions outside of either a dramatic reduction in their size and power, or their complete elimination.

    此致onebornfree

    • 同意: Johnny Walker Read
  63. Z-man 说:

    The CIA should have assassinated Chavez when they had the chance. Now Venezuela is a basket case that the middle class of the rest of the Americas is going to have to pay for, for years to come.

    • 巨魔: Herald
  64. @Johnny Rico

    Quoting David Cole eh??? Of course, he was quoting the guy in The Wire, right?

    • 回复: @Johnny Rico
  65. Moi 说:

    The Saker: “The Neocons never cease to amaze me…”

    Wrong. You should have said, “The Americans never cease to amaze me…” because America’s penchant for violence is unmatched in modern times.

  66. Amon 说:
    @Johnny Rico

    I believe they are referring to the practice of diverting funds that would otherwise go to maintain vital infrastructure, health care services and sanitation to over purchase military equipment by the billions in order to maintain a high level of income for the armaments industry.

    It also smacks of distorted priorities when the US military can fund and construct a small town sized base with a private 18 hole golf course, a multi room cinema, a McDonalds and a Burger King in faraway Iraq while the US government can’t find enough funds to re pave a major road just outside of Washington DC.

    They could also be talking about the weird practice of US tax money getting flushed down the toilet by funding one army project after another that always, always goes over budget, under delivers on promises, breaks down too easy and can’t fight off decade old tech if they don’t cancel it after a billion or so is lost.

    As for me, when I look at the US, I shake my head when I notice that the military industrial complex and the Government have become one and the same thanks to the revolving door between private companies and US Gov offices.

    • 回复: @NoseytheDuke
  67. Johann 说:
    @The Alarmist

    The exact words spoken behind the conquering general’s ear was “ sic transit gloria mundi”. Latin for the glory of the world is a passing thing.

  68. This guy made a hilarious satirical video showing what media coverage of the US would look like if it was covered the absurdly biased way CNN covers Venezuela…

  69. An image which syas it all about why Venezuela is being attacked…..

    #Graphic of the day: The world’s largest #oil reserves by country. Still surprised why #Venezuela is so important?

    • 回复: @Fatima Manoubia
  70. Abby Martin asked yesterday:

    How many western news outlets showed the massive marches in Venezuela protesting the US-backed coup today? #HandsOffVenezuela

    • 回复: @RobinG
  71. @Michael Hoffman

    “Trump’s intentions are good…”

    Seriously? If I ever get caught red-handed robbing a bank, I want you on the jury.

    “…the road to hell just happens to be paved with good intentions.”

    The problem with that cliche is its failure to note that the crew doing the “paving” are liars.

  72. Anon[424]• 免责声明 说:

    Certainly I would not trust anyone with Abrams face , not with Maduro face , not with Bolton face ( is he ok ? is he organic , like Pelosi ? ) , not with Pompeo face and ass ( what an italianamerican fatso ) , In fact I don`t even completely trust myself ……

    By the way , I was told that the US marines are now so feminist that their wear rose underwear , and not only the women marines , anyone knows about it ?

  73. I’m with Florida Maquis on this one. An invasion of Venezuela will be no cake walk and will also be one of the greatest miscalculations America will ever make.

    • 回复: @Pindos
  74. @Fatima Manoubia

    See which of those countries have already fallen into US “sphere of influence” ( read crude vasallage, i .e, voluntary concession of main part of oil exploitation/revenues, or unvoluntary, through destruction of state and conversion into failed state…), and you will find the origins of so much, Venezuelaphobia, Russophobia, Iranophobia…..

    • 回复: @RobinG
  75. Desert Fox 说:

    What we have here is the Zionist controlled U.S. government at work again on behalf of the Zionist NWO in invading and destroying nations at the behest of the Zionist overlords which has been in place in the U.S. since the 1913 installation of the unconstitutional FED and IRS! First came the Zionist banking Kabal forcing America into WWI and then on down to the Mideast and now the latest Venezuela.

    With all the warmongering members of congress led by the Satanists Bolton and Abrams baying for another war to destroy yet another country for their masters in New York and Tel Aviv and London and again their lie of democracy for the victim , which we here have never had since 1913.

    This policy is nothing new , see War is a Racket by General Smedly Butler and The Secret Team by Colonel L. Fletcher Prouty and Clinton, Bush and the CIA by Terry Reed and see Reeds videos on you tube, the books can be had on Amazon.

    The zionist hounds from hell are driving America to destruction.

    • 同意: Johnny Walker Read
  76. @onebornfree

    Great video explaining the insanity of the Neocons and the fact that they own Trump.

  77. Pindos 说:
    @Alfred

    “All these cretins – like Nasser, Havez el Assad, Saddam Hussein”. All very smart men sitting atop volcanic populations while the CIA sought to destroy them.

  78. wayfarer 说:

    马克思主义理论中的社会主义是从推翻资本主义到实现共产主义之间的过渡性社会状态。

    来源: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communism

    Slow Collapse of Venezuela as Air Force General Defects

    • 回复: @AnonFromTN
    , @cassandra
  79. Pindos 说:
    @Johnny Walker Read

    “…the greatest miscalculations America will ever make.” Wow! How can this possibly top what’s gone on before.

  80. Every time it seems possible that The Saker has written something reliably informative one comes across the clues which counsel scepticism. Here we find a link to the word “cowardice” applied to Americans but it shows only the award of rather a lot of medals for nothing very belligerent. That seems dishonest but it is more likely carelessness that associates Bolton, Pompeo and Abrams with Trump’s dealings with North Korea.

  81. @renfro

    I don’t trust Kushner, but denying clearances is the main weapon used by the Deep State to retain control, and Trump was right to place his own man in charge. Note the media sources mentioned are Deep State media, who quote “the CIA” as though that is a person to be trusted. I’m sure people like Ron Unz and the Saker would be denied clearances if appointed to a position in Washington if Deep Staters were gatekeepers. The “CIA” prefer narcissistic retired military officers who lack a soul and wave the flag.

    • 回复: @Desert Fox
    , @renfro
  82. Mike P 说:

    I love the photographs of Abrams and Guaido – they both look like caricatures of themselves.

  83. Jeff Davis 说:
    @eah

    “…disregard the political feasibility or consequences of doing so for the moment…”

    And while you’re at it, disregard the fact that water runs down hill… Which is to say you are disconnected from reality.

    Yes, “…Congress can change the law at any time“. But any Congressperson who wants to can also buy a gun and blow his/her brains out. What are the chances of that, do you think? Any attempt by any group of Congresscritters to take away the retirement income from seniors would be political suicide. Water does not run uphill.

    • 回复: @Harold Smith
    , @eah
  84. “This apparent logical contradiction is the direct result of a worldview and mindset which is, I believe, unique to the Neocons: a mix of imperial hubris and infinite arrogance, a complete lack of decency, a total contempt for the rest of mankind, crass ignorance, a narcissist/sociopath’s inability to have any kind of empathy or imagine another guy’s reaction and, finally, last but most certainly not least, crass stupidity.”

    They do what they do because they’re “evil.” At first glance this statement seems trite if not completely meaningless; yet it’s actually the simplest and most profoundly informative explanation. Trying to understand these “people” without resort to, ultimately, Biblical concepts of “good” and “evil,” is like trying to understand the photoelectric effect without resort to quantum theory.

    In analyzing various physical phenomena, for example, classical physics only gets you so far. At some point – generally when dealing with physical extremes such as very small size or very high velocity – it breaks down.

    Almost everyone can “understand” a case where a druggie knocks off a convenient store to get some money to buy drugs, but analogous to the failure of classical physics in an extreme physical situation, worldly explanations generally fail to explain the extreme human behavior that these “people” demonstrate.

  85. AnonFromTN 说:
    @Alfred

    Maduro has no military background. He rose through the ranks in the trade unions. However, he is just as clueless about running the economy as most people with military background. Or, for that mater, most people without military background, like Clinton, both Bushes, Obama, or Trump, not to mention minor puppets like Merkel, Macron, May, Trudeau, etc.

  86. AnonFromTN 说:
    @Johnny Rico

    Wow! So, where does 600 billion and rising annual deficit come from?
    Not to mention that only a madman (or a MIC puppet) would spend one out of 3.4 trillion on military.

    • 回复: @Johnny Rico
  87. 好?
    My view is different.
    This appears as killing two birds with one stone.
    US gets control of Venezuelan oil, and Trump now can say to Netanyahu: We cannot attack Iran because we are too busy in Venezuela.
    But it could have a little snag there. It is a jungle there. Small military groups of resistance could move around indefinitely killing American interests. US does not have a shining reputation fighting in the jungle. Could be a tremendous boost for companies manufacturing agent Orange????

  88. Jeff Davis 说:

    Bolton, Pompeo, and Abrams aren’t Trump. Bolton can show his yellow pad — the 5,000 troops bluff — all he wants, but Trump will ***NEVER*** commit the US military to action against Venezuela. Bolton’s threat is a bluff, in itself a sign of weakness.

    This “Maduro must go” business is the same as “Assad must go”. Except that in the case of Syria, there were well-funded and armed Jihadis with which to attack Assad/Syria (which compelled the Russians to intervene). In Venezuela there are no such boots on the ground, so the Bolton, Pompeo, Abrams “axis” will be restricted to economic warfare. I predict that they will fail and be humiliated, at which point Trump will place the blame entirely on them and fire them, just before 2020.

    Meanwhile, Venezuela will suffer, but endure. Nicaragua and Cuba (and to a lesser extent Mexico under AMLO) will have no illusions about the Bolton et al “plan to remake Latin America”, and will stand by Venezuela. Guido and his party leaders, as with previous opposition elements who pursued the violent overthrow of the Chavez/Maduro movement, will be arrested. Russia, China, and the majority of the world community will call for mediation. Negotiations will commence, and drag on until Bolton, Pompeo, Abrams, and Trump are all gone from the scene. Guaido and his accomplices, having been neutered politically, will eventually be released.

    • 同意: Robjil
    • 回复: @Desert Fox
    , @Albionrevisited
  89. @Jeff Davis

    He’s not “disconnected from reality”; he’s merely trying to explain the underlying “legal reality” of a situation that many people don’t understand.

    In fact congress is already screwing lots of people over with the so-called “Windfall Elimination Provision,” which perfectly exemplifies his point.

  90. Elliot Abrams is straight out of a propaganda poster from Germany in the 30’s.

    • 回复: @Grace Poole
  91. eah 说:
    @Jeff Davis

    What are the chances of that, do you think?

    I can’t say; but more likely than you imagine, since going by current revenue/budget/’entitlement’ spending projections, re that there is a 100% chance of a crisis — this will only be exacerbated by the (another projection) fact a majority non-white America will be on the hook for the enormous cost of ‘entitlements’ due to an aging (and much better off, on average) majority white population — so yes, I do think there will be, at the least, means-tested benefit cuts — as well as massive money printing (QE), which will impact the status of the USD (how much is the question).

    • 回复: @nsa
  92. Desert Fox 说:
    @Jeff Davis

    Trump does what he is told by the Zionists who control the U.S. government and in the case of Venezuela Trump will do whatever the Zionists want , which another unending war.

    • 回复: @anon
  93. @The Scalpel

    I would read Goddard’s top 1980 thriller, “Balefire”, to understand what one very highly trained terrorist can do to a country like the United States.

    You don’t need suicidal personnel, just a single person who knows what he or she is doing…

  94. AnonFromTN 说:
    @wayfarer

    Remember all those Syrian generals who defected? Ever wondered where they are now, when Assad is winning the war?

    • 回复: @wayfarer
  95. nsa 说:
    @eah

    “massive money printing which will impact the status of the USD (how much is the question)”.
    No mystery at all. In the whole history of the human race, no paper currency (chits, really) has done anything other than become worthless…..i.e. maybe useful as toilet paper. The only question is how long it takes. For example, it would take \$1 now to buy what 3 cents fetched in 1913.

    • 同意: Desert Fox
    • 回复: @Mefobills
  96. @The Scalpel

    同意

    Color Revolution on full display in Venezuela.

    Coming soon to the USA.

    • 回复: @AnonFromTN
  97. anon[144]• 免责声明 说:
    @Desert Fox

    Jews are working their way up the South American continent.

    Israhell in Patagonia
    https://new.euro-med.dk/20180104-das-2-israel-in-patagonien-argentina-zufluchtsort-fur-israelische-elite-nach-gog-magog-angriff.php

    also: recall that George Bush delegated his daughter/s to buy up huge territory in Paraguay

    https://agorafinancial.com/2015/04/24/why-did-george-bush-buy-nearly-300000-acres-in-paraguay/

    • 同意: Desert Fox
    • 回复: @Mefobills
  98. El Dato 说:
    @Svigor

    Is that about the extent of the “aggression”? Oh, wait, I’m guessing their going after CITGO got a mention too, and goes into the “aggression” column, with the assumption being that Venezuela has some Divine, God-given, inviolable right to access US markets. Right?

    “Muh markets! They are being accessed!! Help me, Neocons, you are the only hope!!”

    No rule but US rule and let’s make it up as we go along like true robber barons. Let’s implement Droit du Seigneur, too while we are it.

    Dead skeletons of empires past give a small wink, then cackle disconcertingly.

  99. @Beefcake the Mighty

    US aggression against Venezuela is straight out of the Jewish – Zionist – Anglo propaganda campaign against Germany starting in WWI, Versailles, Weimar, WWII, and psychological warfare carried out against (primarily/initially) Germany by primarily Jewish elements acting in CIA and US occupation forces in Germany.

    Where did all those Jews go, after German brains were sufficiently jellied?

    美国
    美国
    美国

    Ritchie Boys — German Jews who started migrating to USA in ~1932, ‘enlisting’ in US spy and spy ops training at Fort Ritchie, MD in large numbers by 1936, deployed to Germany, France, Italy to subvert, steal documents, spy, and stayed on as prosecutors or their assistants at Nuremberg; stayed on with occupying forces to scrub “Nazism” from the German psyche.

    Where did they go after that Mission Acoomplished?

  100. Anglo Zionists have been working this scheme to take Venezuela for many years —

    The Chávez Plan to Steal Venezuela’s Presidential Election: What Obama Should Do
    September 19, 2012
    Ray Walser

    Former Senior Policy Analyst
    Ray is the former Senior Policy Analyst

    Abstract: On October 7, 2012, Venezuela’s Hugo Chávez will stand for re-election against opposition candidate Henrique Capriles. The Venezuelan presidential election matters to the U.S.: Venezuela is a major oil supplier to the U.S.; Chávez’s anti-American worldview has led to alliances with Iran, Syria, and Cuba; and Chávez offers safe havens to FARC and Hezbollah. Chávez also works to weaken democratic governance throughout the Americas. Under the Obama Administration, the U.S. has offered no comprehensive strategy or policy for dealing with the man who continuously demonstrates his ruthlessness in implementing an anti-American, socialist, Bolivarian Revolution across the Americas, but there is still time for the U.S. to support democratic freedoms before the election. [becuz zio-bolshies luvs them their “democratic freedoms,” and if that doesn’t work, bump off Chavez. Cancer. Poor guy. Prolly caught it from Arafat.]. https://www.heritage.org/americas/report/the-chavez-plan-steal-venezuelas-presidential-election-what-obama-should-do

    Start Up Nation, Meet Start Up Retaliation
    https://www.unz.com/external/11-killed-in-pittsburgh-massacre-suspect-charged-with-29-counts/#comment-2599670

  101. @foolisholdman

    ” Subjected to US economic measures”

    And precisely just what do these terrible “economic measures” consist of?

    Answer : They consist amongst other items, of the blockade of US consumer products being shipped to said contries, however the big question is : Just why should the supposedly superior communist system be dependent upon the import of dearly needed consumer products from the enemy.
    Why are the superior communists unable to supply their gleeful citizens with the things like shit-paper and canned-goods.

    Authenticjazzman “Mensa” qualified since 1973, airborne trained US Army vet, and püro jazz artist.

    • 回复: @AnonFromTN
  102. Agent76 说:

    Feb 2, 2019 The REAL Reason The U.S. Wants Regime Change in Venezuela

    The U.S. and its allies have decided to throw their weight behind yet another coup attempt in Venezuela. As usual, they claim that their objectives are democracy and freedom. Nothing could be farther from the truth.

    Feb 3, 2019 Venezuela’s Oil Enough for World’s 30 Year Energy Needs

    The long bankrupt fiat financial system is pushing the Deep State to target Venezuela for the latter’s natural resources that dwarfs that of its satellite province Saudi Arabia.

    https://geopolitics.co/2019/02/03/venezuelas-oil-enough-for-worlds-30-year-energy-needs/

  103. joe webb 说:

    Venezuela is only about one-third White, and the Whiter one is, the more resources one has with which to flee.

    Venezuela , like Injun and Black Latin America, will always be relatively hopeless. Its Whites could flock maybe to Brazil and build up the White Ethno State there in the south, and cut loose the north to return to Africa, etc.

    And many could come to the US if we had a racialist immigration policy. Good Luck.

    So yeah, send in the Marines, etc. How about an Israeli invasion force?

    乔·韦伯

  104. AnonFromTN 说:
    @Grace Poole

    让我想起一个笑话:
    – Why color revolutions do not happen in the US?
    ——因为那里没有美国大使馆。

  105. AnonFromTN 说:
    @Authenticjazzman

    Just imagine for a second that everything “Made in China” disappears from the US stores. Then ask: why is the superior indispensable democratic country cannot supply its citizens with all this crap? Why does it have to rely on communist dictatorship to produce so much, from nails, electric bulbs, and appliances to clothes?

    • 回复: @Mefobills
  106. Mefobills 说:
    @nsa

    Sorry, not true.

    The original bronze disks of Rome circulated as currency. The metal money of U.S. Confederacy circulated… that is until the Confederacy became no more.

    The point? Money’s true nature is law. When a country collapses, then its money collapses.

    Paper money that was good? Lincoln’s greenbacks circulated at par. Massachusetts Bills circulated as money and prevented Oligarchs from England and their attempted takeover. The colony used the money to make iron goods (like Cannons) and do commerce.

    The real statement is this: Money when it becomes unlawful, always collapses.

    Massive money printing can happen when too many loans are made, as in the case today as all private bank credit notes come into being with loan activity – a little more that 98%.

    Driving a currency down with shorts causes new money to be loaned into existence, which in turn is the underlying cause of hyperinflations. The new credit creation covers the short. This mechanism always goes along with exchange rate pressures, where your country has to pay a debt in a foreign currency.

    If you had an internal gold currency, which is recognized internationally, then your debts would be paid in gold, which would collapse your country into depression instead of inflation.

    Bottom line is that money’s true nature is law, and making claims about “paper” or “metal” obscures this fact.

    • 回复: @cassandra
  107. Mefobills 说:
    @anon

    Israhell in Patagonia

    When Herzyl created Zionism, several outlets for the International Jew were bandied about.

    Uganda was offered up, and Ugandans were willing to allow Jews to come to their country.

    Patagonia was called “the practical country.” This means that international zionist banksters recognized this area as good for the Jewish international diaspora. They still do. Always keep your jaundiced eye on Jewish activity in Argentina.

    The ideal country was Palestine of course. Our over-reaching friends went for Palestine and maneuvered behinds the scenes for it, including the march toward war.

    Personally, I would like to see a reverse Havarra plan, where a new Jewish homeland is created in Uganda, or some black African country (not south africa). Jewish reverse Havarra movement is funded, so they cannot Kvetch for 6 million years into the future.

    The natural parasitism of the Negro will then dissipate the natural parasitism of the Jew. In other words, being surrounded by the Negro should be the natural condition for the Jew. Nothing good can come for Zionist Jewry being located in the Middle East.

  108. abcd 说:

    I can write the same about Russia and China, hypocrite

  109. @NoseytheDuke

    Pure ad hominem. It is not my credibility that is in question. You provide no detail and no evidence. Just more hand-waving and no credible approach to any problems that exist. Grow up.

  110. cassandra 说:
    @eah

    Since both the Fed and your local bank create money from nothing …

    They also impose some obligations: repayment of principle and interest. Since we can’t create money from nothing, this payback has to come from money somehow created by the banks as well.

    I’m less worried about “disappearing” tax money than I am about misallocated spending and its consequences — eg the ‘black budget’ of the NSA and ‘deep state’ generally.

    Can’t we worry about 一切?

    Good point about the ‘black budget’. But the last time some sort of DOD audit was attempted the Pentagon accountants’ offices got hit by a missile, I mean airliner, on 911.

  111. Venezuela, unlike Iraq, is a legitimate threat to the US and it’s collapse could bring waves of refugees to our border. They have the worlds largest oil reserves and some of the worlds most beautiful women. This is a coup I could actually get behind.

    -Keep out of our hemisphere, slav.

    -Russia is just as controlled by “Zionist” interests as the US is.

    -The alternative to American hegemony would be global chaos.

    • 不同意: JamesinNM
    • 回复: @JamesinNM
    , @Harold Smith
  112. @Jeff Davis

    I don’t think it will fail at all. The middle class in Venezuela hates the government and many people in the underclass are near starvation. Would you rather receive medical treatment and food under American protection or starve under a neo-Soviet junta? Personally I would prefer the former.

    • 回复: @AnonFromTN
  113. JamesinNM 说:

    Should a sovereign nation be justified in using any weapon obtainable against a foreign invader?

  114. AnonFromTN 说:
    @Johnny Rico

    Take heart. I know people for whom 2×2 is unintelligible.

    • 哈哈: Vidi
  115. Mefobills 说:
    @AnonFromTN

    Just imagine for a second that everything “Made in China” disappears from the US stores. Then ask: why is the superior indispensable democratic country cannot supply its citizens with all this crap? Why does it have to rely on communist dictatorship to produce so much, from nails, electric bulbs, and appliances to clothes?

    I can answer this, and it wasn’t always that way. Listen to Linda Ronstadt’s lyrics.

    The superior indispensable country became a liberal democracy in 1912 with the advent of Wilson’s progressive era reforms. The 16’th amendment is used to back up the instability of banks – remember TARP? 17’th is used to make Senators into populists and hence break state power. Senators then become easy to bribe and maneuver as they cannot be recalled by their state Legislature, and no longer do the bidding of their voters. Federal Reserve Act, IRS, March to War, and so on. Women’s suffrage made easy to maneuver and emotionally driven women prey for the tribe.

    It takes awhile for some things to manifest. The U.S. export of Jobs and American Patrimony began under Clinton. The idea was for Wall Street to make some wage arbitrage. The Wall Street China/China gambit then began, and transplanted companies exported from China at just under the American price. The Patrimony of America was gifted to China, all of the knowledge from the past was monetized for today, so the future was screwed.

    This is yet another reason (how many do you need) for our hand rubbing friends to be disallowed from ever being near money or finance.

    Justinian of Byzantium prevented Jews from being in government, teaching in schools, or in counting houses – what goes for banking today.

    This still didn’t work for us, because their descendants from Pale of Settlement, immigrated to U.S. to become today’s Neo-Cons.

    • 回复: @AnonFromTN
  116. wayfarer 说:
    @AnonFromTN

    You tell me, then we’ll both know.

    只是在开玩笑。

    I have no idea, geopolitics is not my department.

    My only geopolitical mission, is to simply lay minefields sowed with anti-deceit mines.

    “Why We Fight: Deception, Theater and Lies.”

    ...

    • 回复: @AnonFromTN
  117. AnonFromTN 说:
    @Mefobills

    I know that it wasn’t always like that. Even 15 years ago when I searched in stores for something not made in China, I used to succeed most of the time, finding things made in the US, Japan, Germany, etc. Now I gave up: even if you find something not made in China, it is made in Vietnam or in the Philippines. I know the reason for that, too: blinding greed of our elites, the same reason they want to bring “democracy” to Iraq or Venezuela.

    • 回复: @Mefobills
  118. AnonFromTN 说:
    @Albionrevisited

    You mean, get food and treatment like Iraqis, Afghanis, and Ukrainians? If Venezuelans buy this fairy tale, they deserve everything that’s coming to them.

    • 回复: @Sergey Krieger
  119. @Svigor

    Let’s see. The threat of use of violence as done by Pence and Pompeo is illegal according to international law. The confiscation of Venezuelan money is illegal. For years the US has been crying very loud like a child about a very doubtful Russian interference in their elections. Now the US is interfering openly and heavily in Venezuela but demands that everybody accepts that. The US supports a violent opposition gang in Venezuela. You only have to read Blumenthsl and Cohen to be aware of that. Lastly, economic sanctions may be illegal according to international commerce rules. Is this violence enough for you?

  120. @AnonFromTN

    I do not think they know what Ukraine is and with what it is being eaten. Same goes for Iraq and Afghanistan. This makes me think what about Ukraine. Do they read new from around the world to step into such pile of crap again.

    • 回复: @AnonFromTN
  121. RobinG 说:
    @Carlton Meyer

    Even if you hate Samantha Bee, this takedown of the F-35 is right on target. Includes a swipe at “some state will get the contract anyway” Bernie Sanders.

    Military Spending | January 30, 2019 Act 2 | Full Frontal on TBS

  122. AndrewR 说:
    @The Scalpel

    Lol Venezuela isn’t going to be producing a lot of suicide bombers

  123. RobinG 说:
    @Fatima Manoubia

    Tweet from @kgosztola

    With announcement from John Bolton that US military will help deliver humanitarian aid to Guaido & Venezuela opposition, worth recalling this history: in 1980s, CIA arranged to deliver military equipment to Contra rebels in Nicaragua on planes designated for “humanitarian aid.”

  124. Good article in my opinion. I only wonder why sacker constantly tries to compare Soviet Brezhev period leadership to this criminal and utterly moronic cabal running show in the west. For all senility brezhnev was a good man and Soviet regime und et him was providing people with all of the most important things in life of which confidence in tomorrow would not be the least important. Anybody here is confident in what tomorrow is bringing now? Senility is not a sin. USSR under those people did a lot of good things for many people even outside USSR. Hence comparison is incorrect. Considering sacker himself was working for anglozionists, as he calls them , against USSR I wonder why he brings USSR in negative terms almost in every article while stating he is sort of supporter of what Chavez was doing in his pathetic way, while USSR represented the only successful case of socialist society which worked. I see no logic here at all.
    Otherwise, let USA unmask itself, bankrupt itself and die. Without destruction of the whole system nothing new and better cannot appear. What worry me is that I see no forces or people of Lenin stalin scale anywhere hence situation is not a pleasant one. Where is alternative?

  125. AndrewR 说:

    My hatred of leftism prevents me from getting too upset at whatever actions the US takes to remove Maduro and his cronies from power.

    • 回复: @AnonFromTN
    , @Lot
  126. AnonFromTN 说:
    @Sergey Krieger

    CNN journos placed Ukraine somewhere in Pakistan on live TV. That reflects geographical knowledge of a typical American, who sincerely believes that the world consists of three roughly equal parts: Main Street, out-of-town, and overseas. The less the population knows, the easier it is to lie to it.

    • 回复: @yurivku
  127. AnonFromTN 说:
    @wayfarer

    Well, that’s very much geopolitical. If you debunk all lies, that would be the end of American hegemony. If the word gets rid of American hegemony, the number of wars would decrease by ~90%.

  128. AnonFromTN 说:
    @AndrewR

    You are a living proof how powerful brainwashing is as a tool to control the populace. Big Brother is proud of you!

    • 同意: tac
    • 回复: @Authenticjazzman
  129. @Albionrevisited

    “Venezuela, unlike Iraq, is a legitimate threat to the US and it’s collapse could bring waves of refugees to our border.”

    What’s stopping you from buying a gun tomorrow and trying to shoot your neighbors with it? Apparently nothing; thus by your “reasoning” you are a legitimate threat to your neighbors and they would therefore be justified to shoot you on sight, right?

    • 回复: @Albionrevisited
  130. renfro 说:
    @Carlton Meyer

    is the main weapon used by the Deep State

    LOL…Deep State is a term used by the simple minded.
    There is no ‘deep state’…there is however a 影子政府 and it is made up of various groups all jockeying for their own interest.

    We have the ‘Establishment..i.e. the two parties who want to maintain their political power.
    We have the Corporate Elites and Globalist ‘ who want to control the world’s commerce and economies.
    We have Wall Street who doesnt want any restrictions on their financial crimes.
    We have Domestic Business Interest who want laws and policies favorable to them.
    We have Foreign Interest who want to use the US for their country.
    Sometimes they join forces when their interest coincide, sometimes they don’t.

    Outside of this shadow government we have Ideological Activist of various kinds that can be useful or not to the Establishment, the Globalist, Wall Street, Domestic Business Interest and Foreign Interest.

    All of the above are why we cant and don’t have coherent policies on anything foreign or domestic.

    People like you who want to ascribe everything to some giant conspiracy in the CIA help to dumb people down , its easier for the lazy to have one or two big scary entities to blame. You cant even explain what the CIA conspiracy is can you? Tell us how the CIA maintains their conspiracy against the US and what their goal is. How does the CIA maintain their secret agenda when the CIA is subject to new CIA directors with every change of presidents and parties?

    Come on tell us all how it is done.

  131. Anonymous [AKA "Jitters"] 说:

    I read an interesting hypothesis, years ago, that a population cannot form a Democracy nor Republic when the mean national IQ is below 95. A population with a mean IQ of < 95 provides a labor force capable of doing only simple repetitive work or manual labor — it will barely provide enough office workers and engineers to support a modern economy. Quite simply, the Central American population cannot take care of itself and will migrate to North America, because we provide those service, oddly for free, that they need. So, we can either accept hundreds of millions of poor uneducated workers, or colonize them. Colonization is a better option, because our economy cannot even support our present underclass.

  132. @JamesinNM

    I agree, you can have the Ukraine, but stay out of our hemisphere, drunk.

    • 回复: @WHAT
  133. Lot 说:
    @AndrewR

    就是那种精神!

    If we’re lucky the new government will stiff China and Russia on Maduro’s loans.

  134. Lot 说:
    @Svigor

    “FFS, why does anyone publish or read you?”

    Israel isn’t the only country with a hasbara budget.

    • 回复: @L.K
  135. RobinG 说:
    @Fatima Manoubia

    The Trump/Bolton/Abrams Axis of Evil wants to use “aid” delivery as a pretext for invasion and/or smuggling a Contra force into Venezula. The Red Cross politely tries to talk them out of it.

    Red Cross talks to US about risks of sending Venezuela aid
    https://apnews.com/55b00d320d744b49856614c432c0d686

  136. @Michael Kenny

    You think about Putin even more than he thinks about himself. Do you even dream about him every night?

  137. @Harold Smith

    This is true, in fact, I might stage a preemptive strike. My neighbors wife is hotter than mine and he has a better mower…To war and booty!

    You should check out some Venezuelan women, Harold. Did I mention the oil reserves?

    I actually hope the US doesn’t strike Venezuela, but I don’t like these Russians’ meddling in our affairs, just as I don’t think we should meddle in theirs.

  138. HiHo 说:

    Wonderful wishful dreaming article that so completely misses the point. Again a lack of history I think.
    You have to look at people like Churchill, revered by the termites for doing their duty and refusing more than a dozen attempts by Mister H to make peace. Mr C murdered one and a half million Indians in India through his incompetence and then washed his hands of his crime by claiming Indians breed too fast.
    The Empire won’t collapse any time soon. The profit comes from the chaos, the fear, the arrogance. While Venezeulans make up a significant proportion of the Spsnish Legion, quite simply because Latins make the best infantry, their civilian brothers will fight the Empire tooth and nail.
    Most Venezuelans aren’t going anywhere except back home and any US goon who thinks it will be a walk in the park is going to have a rude awakening.
    You see Churchill was an alcoholic gambler who helped his termite friends relieve Britian of its gold in exchange for fifty pieces of floating scrap. You see the Empire’s servants are pure dross. While others, like Churchill are scum.
    So dream on…the end is not nigh.

    • 回复: @Authenticjazzman
  139. bluedog 说:
    @Johnny Rico

    Lol as ignorant as you are it would be a waste of time,go troll some other place where you haven’t worn out your welcome….

    • 回复: @Another Anon
    , @Johnny Rico
  140. tac 说:
    @renfro

    伦弗洛:

    I keep pointing out to what is happening in front of the world’s eyes (eyes wide shut and fed distortions by TPTB, to be more realistic) in France with our own democratic cousins, although far from a real revolution and for many differing reasons, who, week-after-week, continue to mobilize and choose to make their voices heard. [I must admit, despite my attempts to awaken people, few seem to care or pay attention to what I post…at least that is what I believe]

    This is a real-life example of an organic uprising–grievances aside–of what could gain traction–in large numbers if people kept an eye on it, but will the average distracted person even dare to challenge his/her place in the rapidly changing world? Doubtful, to say the least, but it is a real-life avenue of what resistance really looks like–no matter their abuse by the security services!!!

    Most people are simply not sufficiently ‘moved’ to imagine their future subservience or utter destruction from the gene pool. The future prospects for people’s progeny is unfathomable to contemplate; it is likely more profound than anyone of can dare to imagine.

    So it comes to this: either you stand up and fight, no matter the outcome, or you are resigned to the will of the powers who scheme endlessly in opposition to your will, desires, and way of life–NO MATTER YOU LEANINGS! They control BOTH SIDES for a reason….and that reason is simple: their will, their desire, their ability to make a difference!

    Now, comes the difficult question: when will WE (as a whole, even if in the minority) dare to stand-up, not to be raped anymore, guided by principle, morality, self-confidence, and a greater-than-me willingness to finally challenge authority, what is spoken, what is happening to our own citizenry beyond the keyboard?

    One only has a single life; what one chooses to do with it is entirely up to each individual, but having done NOTHING (or the minimum) is but a recipe for what will be done when left for others, more powerful, economically and politically more advantaged to do as they wish.

    So, is it too late? Are we too distracted with our everyday lives to see what awaits us and our children….?

    What it boils down ultimately is this: WHO is to be sacrificed, you or your progeny? tic-toc, tic-toc, tick-toc….

    • 回复: @renfro
  141. renfro 说:
    @tac

    when will WE (as a whole, even if in the minority) dare to stand-up, not to be raped anymore, guided by principle, morality, self-confidence, and a greater-than-me willingness to finally challenge authority, what is spoken, what is happening to our own citizenry beyond the keyboard?

    I think there have been and are a few, very few, people who have and do stand up.
    But they need followers and although most people are followers, not leaders, they don’t even stand up until they reach the proverbial….. ‘Nothing left to lose

    By then of course the damage is already done.

    • 回复: @tac
  142. tac 说:
    @Michael Kenny

    If you truly fail to notice who and what is the real elephant in the room than you are either: (a) in on it and serve to further its goals and ambitions, or (b) an imbecile who deserves everything coming his/her way–including your offspring!!!

    Which is it: (a) or (b)?

  143. tac 说:
    @renfro

    Nothing left to lose–yes….that is the real issue at hand, sadly, regretfully and ashamedly, but in the end deservingly!

    BTW, aside from your perspective on the matter, do you follow my posts on the Gilets Jaunes?

    These are but ordinary people for whom the very existence of the ‘government’ is meant to serve–not that doing nothing should be rewarded, quite the opposite: gov’t, if it exists, should encourage work, creativity, and contribution–then, and only then, should it take the collective work and distribute it among its citizenry (to those who contribute along with a small minority who cannot for some reason) and those who contribute less-to-nothing get a lower hand-out (to discourage these behaviors, to the ability they are in control of their work-ethic or lack thereof), not just the leeches at the top–who lie, cheat, and live on the back of the innovators, thinkers and otherwise people who contribute to the ‘system’.

    We are, in the end, who we are defined by our contributions–aside from the leeches (poor or rich) who simply have found a convenient way to profit from such lazy scheming! These, especially ones that make a fortune from other’s work should NOT be rewarded from their theft, but they are, nonetheless, in our societies! Imagine if they–on their very own ingenuity–had to produce for a living: much like the bloviated gov’t!!!

    • 回复: @renfro
  144. Mefobills 说:
    @AnonFromTN

    I know the reason for that, too: blinding greed of our elites, the same reason they want to bring “democracy” to Iraq or Venezuela.

    The point I’m trying to make is that the “elites” are animated by an ideology. This ideology is Talmudic/Zionist Christian – as we can see their situational ethics.

    In terms of economy, it is one of rents and usury. Finance Capitalism is state sponsored usury, and throughout economic history our ((friends)) have always been bad actors. I can make the previous statement with studied authority.

    Even the fall of Venice can be traced to greedy Venetian’s who imported Jews, which then led to a downward cycle.

    This greed is in all men, and the line of good and evil runs right down the middle of us. However, if a group adheres to a doctrine, a narrative, and a religion that promotes deception, then the weak among them will find it easy to cross that line.

    Democracy of the type they promote is easy to maneuver with narrative, and paying off or bribing sycophants. Also getting compromat (compromising material) is a method of control. Winding up emotionally driven women and minorities is child’s play, to then keep society divided and not looking at the real enemies.

    • 回复: @AnonFromTN
  145. renfro 说:
    @tac

    BTW, aside from your perspective on the matter, do you follow my posts on the Gilets Jaunes?

    I cant recall right now…my multitasking is messing with my memory today…lol
    But from your comment I think we are in agreement about the working class and producers in society being given the short end of the stick by their governments…..squeezed by the government who takes care of the government itself, the very rich, the poor….but cares nothing for the people who actually keep it all going.

  146. AnonFromTN 说:
    @Mefobills

    Don’t you think that blaming Jews for everything is just another version of distracting tactics, like blaming Russians, or Chinese, or Muslims, of Latinos, or blacks, or women, or whoever else? That distracts from the real enemies: greedy fat cats that have no morals and no allegiance to anything except their money.

    • 回复: @Harold Smith
    , @NoseytheDuke
  147. L.K 说:
    @Lot

    lot ( of BS)

    Israel isn’t the only country with a hasbara budget

    Says the well known Hasbara operative ‘Lot’ to the Troll ‘Svigor’.

    There is an electronic record of ‘lot’s pro-Israel BS.

  148. L.K 说:

    A list of U.S. Interventions in Latin America from 1846 to 1996. Since then there has been a lot more.

    Included are military ops, covert or indirect operations(coups), etc

    https://www.zompist.com/latam.html

  149. And after that Hitler did order all radio stations to play Beethoven symphony Of Faith.
    And after that Trump will order to play: By by Miss American pie. Drove my Chevy to the Levi, Levi was dry, Good all boys were drinking Whisky and Rye……………….

  150. L.K 说:

    委内瑞拉危机:前联合国报告员说,美国的制裁正在杀死公民
    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/venezuela-us-sanctions-united-nations-oil-pdvsa-a8748201.html

    The first UN rapporteur to visit Venezuela for 21 years has told The Independent the US sanctions on the country are illegal and could amount to “crimes against humanity” under international law.

    Former special rapporteur Alfred de Zayas, who finished his term at the UN in March, has criticized the US for engaging in “economic warfare” against Venezuela which he said is hurting the economy and killing Venezuelans. …

    Mr De Zayas, a former secretary of the UN Human Rights Council (HRC) and an expert in international law, spoke to The Independent following the presentation of his Venezuela report to the HRC in September. He said that since its presentation the report has been ignored by the UN and has not sparked the public debate he believes it deserves.

    “Sanctions kill,” he told The Independent, adding that they fall most heavily on the poorest people in society, demonstrably cause death through food and medicine shortages, lead to violations of human rights and are aimed at coercing economic change in a “sister democracy”.

    ...
    德扎亚斯先生在报告中建议,除其他行动外,国际刑事法院应根据《罗马规约》第七条调查对委内瑞拉的经济制裁,将其视为可能的危害人类罪。

    The US sanctions are illegal under international law because they were not endorsed by the UN Security Council, Mr de Zayas, an expert on international law and a former senior lawyer with the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, said. …

    “When I come and I say the emigration is partly attributable to the economic war waged against Venezuela and is partly attributable to the sanctions, people don’t like to hear that. They just want the simple narrative that socialism failed and it failed the Venezuelan people,” Mr de Zayas told The Independent.

    Alfred de Zayas is the author of “A Terrible Revenge: The Ethnic Cleansing of the East European Germans, 1944 – 1950” und “The Wehrmacht War Crimes Bureau, 1939-1945”.

  151. L.K 说:

    Venezuela – Coup Attempt Part Of A Larger Project
    https://www.moonofalabama.org/2019/01/venezuela-coup-attempt-part-of-a-larger-project-military-intervention-likely-to-fail.html

    The Trump administration has launched a large political project to remake several states in Latin America. The Wall Street Journal headlines:

    “U.S. Push to Oust Venezuela’s Maduro Marks First Shot in Plan to Reshape Latin America
    The Trump administration’s broader aim is to gain leverage over Cuba and curb recent inroads in the region by Russia, Iran and China”

    The plan includes regime change in Venezuela, Nicaragua and eventually Cuba. The removal of any Russian or Chinese interest is another point. It is a multiyear project that has bipartisan support. It will likely require military force.

    The project seems to echo the “New Middle East” plan then Secretary of State Condeleeza Rice launched in 2006. …

    That the U.S. is going for such a wide ranging plan in the western hemisphere might explain why Trump is pressing to end the other military projects in the Middle East and Afghanistan.

  152. Art 说:

    Hope you have a good stomach — Gina Haspel, Mike Pompeo, Mike Pence, Elliott Abram, John Bolton, and Jarrad Kushner.

    Barf, vomit, puke, retch, hurl, and gag – that spew is America’s representatives to the world.

    Clearly Trump’s choices have America in a bad place.

    Hmm — what role have Jew bankers played in Venezuela’s money troubles.

    Hmm — Venezuela once sided with Saddam over Israel. Revenge maybe? No – not the Jews. Would they really starve a whole nation of millions in revenge?

    Hmm — is this one more Daddy Trump favor for JAVANKA?

  153. @AnonFromTN

    Don’t you think that blaming “fat cats” and “money” for everything is just another version of distracting tactics?

    I hate to be the bearer of bad news but the imperial madness leading the world to WW3 has nothing to do with “fat cats” and/or “money” per se.

    • 回复: @AnonFromTN
  154. @AnonFromTN

    So, if I understand your comment correctly, there no are no common threads or patterns to any of the seemingly similar or connected historical events involving lies, fraud and theft, often leading to wars, but just a series of random happenings largely initiated by individuals who share the similar traits of excessive greed. Is that about it?

    I wonder if you also know if coincidence theorists possess advanced mathematical sensitivities that enable them to determine likely probabilities within astronomical numerical possibilities? Thanks.

    • 回复: @AnonFromTN
  155. @Amon

    Very well put. Thank you. As far back as the Reagan years there were reports of \$5000 toilet seats and \$1200 hammers. The number of different scams must truly be phenomenal, from overpriced services and equipment to unneeded projects and the big one, unnecessary wars.

    One more instance is valuable aircraft sold off as scrap, to Israel of course, and I’m certain that I have barely touched on anywhere near the true scale of it.

    Even Donald Rumsfeld reported missing squillions on 9/10/2001.

  156. yurivku 说:
    @AnonFromTN

    *** typical American, who sincerely believes that the world consists of three roughly equal parts: Main Street, out-of-town, and overseas. ***

    Funny, but this is not preventing you to state that US citizens are not hostile and are good persons basically.
    Those “good people” with their level of intelligence could be persuaded in anything.
    And we know what are they being persuaded in.
    So they are just dangerous to the whole world.

    • 回复: @AnonFromTN
  157. @bluedog

    But you ignore my reply to you where I explain why those ‘missing Pentagon trillions’ are b*** ***. (post #65)
    So who’s the troll here?

  158. @L.K

    Most signified comment on this thread. (My tip of hat.)

  159. @bluedog

    You don’t even seem interested in whatever point you are trying to make. I’ve already forgotten what we were talking about. Did it have something to do with Venezuela?

    Venezuela as a topic itself is only in the news because Iran and North Korea aren’t. It’s just its turn. It will be gone soon.

  160. wraith67 说:

    5000 troops isn’t 5000 fighters, that would seem like an extremely light package to me*, so I’m inclined to believe that isn’t what anybody’s preparing for (and our side doctrinally prefers and overwhelming advantage, preferably 3 to 1 odds). On our side, there’s nobody mobilizing heavy equipment (pictures of vehicles on rail heads or convoys would already be circulating). SOF is already in country with agencies; you could RDF a light force into country fairly quickly (out of the 82nd, 101st, 10th mt., etc), but it wouldn’t be a long term occupation force (which goes back to the first couple lines above).

    As to how we’d do there, hard to say. If the military sheds their uniforms and dissolves into the population, insurgency style, that’s one thing (Middle Eastern counter-insurgency is a nut the Pentagon deliberately declined to crack, as it would have required addressing Islam). If the Venezuelan military decides to fight in uniform, nobody on our side has any compunctions about killing them and it would go badly for the host nation forces.

    My guess would be if there’s anything being done, it’s probably somebody instigating a coup as opposed to a direct military intervention.

    *caveat – you could have 5000 trigger pullers deploy, but you’re talking a maximum of 72 hours before they’re out of food, bullets, etc. 5000 trigger pullers requires at least another 10,000 people in a logistics and support tail… and those people aren’t as rapidly deployable.

  161. AnonFromTN 说:
    @yurivku

    You are making a pretty common mistake: confusing intelligence with education. These are two different things, and neither correlates with other aspects of character, including moral fiber. American school and college system is specifically designed to keep people uneducated beyond their narrow professional area. Maybe 2% of colleges teach students anything beyond their profession (they call it distribution requirements). That’s what the elites do, and it is more effective than censorship Soviet system used, after actually educating people.

    There were two Americans among my top three graduate students. Both were woefully undereducated in everything outside of their major. But both were smart, hardworking, and nice people to have in the lab. Both were receptive to info, too, except in their case myself (and with one of them – her husband) were the sources of info they’ve encountered for the first time in their lives.

    So, there is no contradiction between being naturally smart and grossly uneducated, or between being anywhere on the intelligence scale and being nice or nasty. To give you an example from Russia, colonel Kvachkov is likely not as smart and educated as Chubais, but he is a good person, whereas Chubais is scum.

  162. AnonFromTN 说:
    @NoseytheDuke

    There is a common thread/pattern: greedy fat cats. While each one of them would readily slash the throat of another for money, they have better class solidarity than deliberately confused “deplorables”. Besides, they know that monopoly give the best opportunity to rob “deplorables” blind, so they do not undermine each other’s monopoly. Another tool they use is the Empire. Unlike Ukrainian morons, they know that you need the protection of a strong state, otherwise competing thieves would gladly steal your loot. Collectively they control the government of the Empire, and through it, the governments of all its vassals.

    So, there are no coincidences: globalist mega-thief class is well organized, controls through direct ownership all MSM that spew the lies they are told to disseminate, and control through their venality the politicians, who via government agencies generate the lies for MSM to spread and conduct imperial [policies that benefit those fat cats.

    While some Russian and Chinese mega-thieves are compardores, others support their countries in the stand-off with the Empire. However, they do it out of their personal pecuniary interests, not because of the goodness of their hearts.

  163. AnonFromTN 说:
    @Harold Smith

    You are making the mistake of Lenin (Marx made the same one in his later years), considering ideology as something separate. Ideology, like religion, is a tool fat cats use to fool the “deplorables” and manipulate them. Their only sincere feeling is greed, and their true ideology boils down to “I have the right to steal this, not the other guy”.

    Imperial madness is not so mad, after all: greedy mega-thieves made the US overextend itself, spending way more than it has on military adventures benefiting those mega-thieves. Now they want to keep the value of the US dollar, which is not backed by anything the US government has or is likely to have, because their loot is mostly denominated in the US dollars. They know deep down that when this house of cards folds, competing mega-thieves supporting Chinese and Russian governments would have the upper hand.

    • 回复: @Harold Smith
  164. Agent76 说:

    Jan 31, 2019 Trump and the MAGA Crowd Embrace the Neocon Plan for Venezuela

    Is it fair to call MAGA neocon lite, or possibly MAGAcons?

    https://kurtnimmo.blog/2019/01/31/trump-and-the-maga-crowd-embrace-the-neocon-plan-for-venezuela/

  165. Anonymous [AKA "Craig Spence"] 说:

    Now then. Squirted out of Syria and Afghanistan like shit through a goose, CIA tries to look tough someplace else, someplace where they might not get their ass kicked this time – Venezuela! That’ll do the trick!

    …So how’s that workin’ out for ya?

    Despite sitting in Daddy’s chair at the OAS, talking big, Pompeo couldn’t pass his bullshit resolution to knock over Venezuela. Even at the OAS. Luis Almagro, Pompeo’s ventriloquist dummy at the OAS pep rallies, got himself kicked out of his party at home for blowing Pompeo too much.

    https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/OAS-Head-Almagro-Expelled-From-His-Party-Due-to-Interventionism-20181215-0014.html

    CIA stuffed DO with dumbshit jarheads, because nobody else was stupid enough to do universal-jurisdiction crimes for Lloyd Blankfein, and now the whole agency is mongoloid, totally inept. A laughingstock.

  166. @L.K

    The project for the “New American Way”

    was not cooked up or launched by Sec/NSA Rice. She’s intelligent and smart, fortuitous and intense, – loyal —

    But the project regarding US primacy is advancing capitalism and democracy by force of neccessary was developed and launched prior to the Bush Admin. The public got its first real taste after 9/11.

  167. @HiHo

    ” Quite simply because Latins make the best infantry”

    Okay so is this a natural, genetic law, sort of like blacks are the best dancers, Germans build the best cars, and British cooking is the worst on earth.

    You are uttering total bullshit and have no clue, period.

    AJM

    • 回复: @anon
  168. @AnonFromTN

    So what you are saying is that anyone who “hates” leftism (including myself) is in reality a brainwashed
    fool, and anyone who loves leftism such as yourself, is an enlightened guru.

    当然可以。

    AJM

    • 回复: @AnonFromTN
  169. AnonFromTN 说:
    @Authenticjazzman

    What I am saying is that anyone who either hates or loves leftism or rightism as such is a brainwashed moron. People capable of thinking do not succumb to knee-jerk reactions.

    Those who swallowed hook, line, and sinker previous lie of the Deep State that communism is bad, period, should be happy swallowing its current lie that homos and open borders are normal. Poetic justice, that.

    • 回复: @Authenticjazzman
    , @Herald
  170. @Ilyana_Rozumova

    ” US does not have a shining reputation fighting in the jungle”

    Pure nonsense, as those young American kids most certainly gave the Japanese a great lesson in courage and perservance, in the jungles of the pacific islands, and the same in Viet Nam : 55000 American casualities, and 2.5 NV losses.

    AJM

    • 回复: @Authenticjazzman
  171. @AnonFromTN

    “You are making the mistake of Lenin (Marx made the same one in his later years), considering ideology as something separate.”

    Huh? Please elaborate.

    “Ideology, like religion, is a tool fat cats use to fool the “deplorables” and manipulate them.”

    You’re heading in the right direction, but the trees seem to be blocking your view of the forest.

    “Their only sincere feeling is greed, and their true ideology boils down to ‘I have the right to steal this, not the other guy.’”

    You keep trying to explain “evil” in worldly terms and it falls flat every time; sorry but it won’t work. Think about what you’re saying for a minute. In essence you’re saying that people who are already wealthy beyond the wildest dreams of the average person (we’re talking about a coterie of mostly billionaires here) are willing to risk planetary extinction for a little more money.

    Take Trump for example. Trump is a billionaire, right? In a few months Trump is going to be 73 years old. Trump could probably literally spend hundreds of thousands of dollars per day for the rest of his life and still not deplete his resources. Yet you would have me believe that he’s willing to risk it all, i.e., his life, his family’s lives, his assets, his country, the planet he has to inhabit, etc., for another measly billion dollars or whatever?

    你能理解这个吗?

    “Imperial madness is not so mad, after all: greedy mega-thieves made the US overextend itself, spending way more than it has on military adventures benefiting those mega-thieves.”

    Once again, they do what they do because they’re “evil”; try as you might you cannot rationalize it. Period. The end.

    You studiously deny the concept of “evil.” Okay, please explain why five people decided to go up on an overpass over I-75 in Michigan and randomly injure and kill people by throwing rocks at the windshields of cars randomly passing by underneath. What is it that made these five people do this?

    https://www.clickondetroit.com/news/michigan/michigan-teens-charged-in-deadly-i-75-rock-throwing-case-have-probable-cause-hearing

    • 回复: @AnonFromTN
  172. @Authenticjazzman

    Correction : 55000 American casualities, and 2.5 million NV losses.

    AJM

    • 回复: @L.K
  173. @AnonFromTN

    So you are saying that the idea of Communism being bad is a “Lie”.

    I’m not sure that the hundred million humans who were liquidated during it’s failed implementation would agree with you.

    I had visitied several east-block countries before the wall came down, and I will never forget the morgue-like atmosphere of the cities and the dead eyes of the hopeless citizens.

    AJM

    • 回复: @AnonFromTN
  174. cassandra 说:
    @wayfarer

    Odd, that: if Venezuelans are truly starving, do the opposition protesters look so well-fed because the US is providing secret aid?

    Styx’ video has a very myopic view of the situation. He totally neglects the economic sabotage being practiced by internal and international financial parties. Opposition parties have been boycotting elections so they can declare them illegitimate, and generally sticking spokes in the wheels of the state by inaction within the government, violent protests in the streets, and a general refusal to engage in constructive dialog with Maduro. The US is applying sanctions of all sorts, both to Venezuela and international trading partners, an is diverting Cisco revenue to Guaido; the Bank of England tells Maduro he can’t have his gold. The endgame of the neoliberal elites behind the opposition, likely including Guaido’s prof at Georgetown, are working for social austerity and privatization of national resources. (As Bolton and Pompeo have proudly asserted.)

    The problems of the Chavista government are due to a hopelessly-tangled combination of elite international economic (and possibly covert military) warfare, Maduro’s mismanagement, and maybe even the structure of socialism itself as libertarian free-marketers will assert. However, socialist governments encounter so much economic hostility from international capitalism that it’s surprising that any exist at all.

    Try this video, for a more nuanced, and much better informed, view of the situation.

    In contrast to guessing the size of demonstrations from youtube videos as Styx does, Piva reports on street conditions from direct experience. By comparison, I’m afraid Styx’s report comes across as an uninformed rant. But it’s not surprising since that’s how our MSM is portraying the situation.

    Missing from all this are any reports of possible activities of China and Russia.

  175. AnonFromTN 说:
    @Harold Smith

    I think your folly is that you are trying to rationalize greed. Greed is irrational, we inherited it from our irrational aggressively territorial cousins, monkeys. Remember Soros: he looks like he died a couple of weeks ago (I wish he did), but still grabs for more loot and resents those who get in his way, including Trump. When greed is powerless, it is simply ridiculous. When greed has power, it becomes evil.

    That’s the downside of so-called market economy: the driving force is greed (apologists like to call it profit, bit semantics don’t change the matter). Unregulated greed, like unregulated power of wind (hurricanes) and water (floods), is destructive, whereas properly regulated it can produce some good.

    You also ignore the fact that all those MIC profiteers don’t really want WWIII. They want to keep stealing huge amounts of taxpayers’ money on military contracts. For that they scare the common folk with dangers that do not exist and regale them with “patriotic” BS they don’t believe in. Deep down they know that to enjoy their loot they must stay alive: unlike pathetic politicians, the gods do not take bribes.

    As to those people throwing rocks from the overpass of I-75, I think “Beavis and Butt-Head” answers your question. Hopeless stupidity of people totally lacking imagination, when it becomes active, is evil. But the people themselves are just unimaginative morons.

    So, my point is there is no such thing as evil per se, there is greed and stupidity (often the combination of the two) that leads to evil actions.

    • 回复: @Harold Smith
  176. @Bill

    Instead of looking at this issue using a microscope, reading history about how Empires fall lends wisdom and insight. Arrighi’s book, (I believe) is called “The Long Twentieth Century.” He details how empires and huge trading giants rise and fall.

    He details the rise of Italy’s banking system during the Middle Ages as well as Spain’s Empire, the Dutch trading hegemonies and most enlightening how the British Empire rose and fell.

    We are seeing tell-tale symptoms of a US that’s in trouble with a slow erosion of the US \$\$ hegemony. The financial growth of China has begun degrading the US market with hi-tech and other products. Thusly, you see Tim Cook of Apple apoplectic over China’s Huwaii (sp?) flooding the European market with less expensive computers, cellulars, notebooks, etc.

    We see the practical nature of Exxon Mobile that views the short geographic distance between the US (its military) to Venezuela’s oil and mineral-rich soil. An easy pick, rather than becoming further embroiled in the Middle East.

    Targeting Venezuela suggests a geopolitical shift away from the Middle East (and Israel) to countries that are less expensive to plunder yet with vast resources to be stolen.

    A telling sign in the slow deteriorating US Hegemony.

  177. AnonFromTN 说:
    @Authenticjazzman

    Here you go: “hundred million victims” is a lie, which you apparently bought. Just count the humans murdered in different ways for the glory of capitalism, starting with millions of Indians starved to death by the Brits, countless American Indians murdered by the settlers, or Africans murdered by the colonial powers, proceeding to Japanese fried alive in Hiroshima and Nagasaki and in fires in several other cities bombed by conventional munitions, to more than a million Indonesians murdered as “communists” by US-backed Suharto regime, or millions of Koreans murdered by the US army, and 2.5 million Vietnamese you like to boast about, etc. The sum total would stun you, and it would be much greater than imaginary 100 million killed by the communists (the true number is likely ~10 million, most of them killed by Mao regime in China).

    Now, tell your stories about dead eyes to someone who does not know the truth. They might believe it. I lived in the USSR for 33 years, and the eyes of the people there were certainly no deader than the eyes of Americans I see for the last 28 years.

    But you are welcome to cling to your beliefs: most people believe all sorts of untrue ridiculous things, and just live with it, many of them happily.

    • 回复: @James Forrestal
  178. cassandra 说:
    @Ilyana_Rozumova

    …Trump now can say to Netanyahu: We cannot attack Iran because we are too busy in Venezuela.

    Given Kuchner’s influence, I’d be much surprised if Trump were trying to evade rather than accomodate Israel’s wishes. Several decades past, Mossad agent Mike Harari’s name kept popping up in Central America, in connection with Iran-Contra and Noriega, and now there are vague reports that Israeli “advisors” have been sent to Brazil. So Mazeltov to the Venezuelan op!

    I myself haven’t given much thought to what stake Israel might have in Central America, but it might be time to take a closer look at the details.

    Small military groups of resistance could move around indefinitely killing American interests.

    Perhaps making common cause with the FARC in Columbia? Wouldn’t be a welcome development!

  179. cassandra 说:
    @Mefobills

    +++++

    I’d extend your comment a bit.

    Internally, a national currency has a value corresponding to demand placed by the government, such as money for the taxes the state requires of its people. The ups and downs of Lincoln’s Greenback fiat currency, especially its interaction with the value of gold, demonstrates how currency is tied to confidence in the government, as you suggest.

    Externally, a nation’s currency usually has value to the extent that a nation has something to offer others, which makes the currency useful for making a desired purchase. Today, the “desired purchase” is oil. The dollar is valued because you need dollars to buy oil, as formerly enforced by diplomatic pressure. Because of US sanctions, trade in oil is now beginning using rubles, yuan, and most unforgivably, Venezuelan currency! (Like Iraq, Libya and Syria). If this keeps up, countries will no longer need dollars for their oil, and \$ will have to compete internationally based on other considerations. That won’t be pretty. IMHO, US leaders have dangerously eroding the dollar’s pre-eminence by profligate use of sanctions.

    I need to remedy my own deficiencies in this area, but advocates of Modern Monetary Theory, like Michael Hudson, Steve Keene, and like-minded economists who often post at nakedcapitalism, make a strong case for a fiat money system, issued and controlled by banks, in contrast to the 私立 banks as now. But objecting to the fact that private bankers charge us interest, and act above the law and democratic accountability, is such a quaint complaint.

  180. anon[250]• 免责声明 说:

    174 wraith67 says:
    4月2019日, XNUMX年

    . If the military sheds their uniforms and dissolves into the population, insurgency style, that’s one thing (Middle Eastern counter-insurgency is a nut the Pentagon deliberately declined to crack, as it would have required addressing Islam). If the Venezuelan military decides to fight in uniform, nobody on our side has any compunctions about killing them and it would go badly for the host nation forces.”

    It has addressed Islam. You must be sleeping throughout the times . It has been addressed in most horrible blinkered tainted prism provided by the neocons and the evangelicals to the media ,pentagon,police,and the grass root organizations that mushroomed after 911. Islam just showed them the responses it deserved.

    And f the military sheds their uniforms and dissolves into the population, insurgency style, that’s one thing” – Fight the war the way enemies ask you not the way the book say or decorum or “manhood /civilty or the stupidest concept like illegal combatant ” insinuates or demands.

  181. anon[250]• 免责声明 说:

    193Johnny Rico says:
    4年2019月9日,格林尼治标准时间下午41:XNUMX
    https://www.metabunk.org/debunked-missing-21-trillion-6-5-trillion-2-3-trillion-journal-vouchers.t9718/

    That took 4 seconds on google.

    Yes It took me 2 sends after reading why the money diverted to do something illegal could easily be called “missing” then later retracted as an accounting error .

  182. Herald 说:

    Nobody will take any notice of Metabunk whether it’s right or wrong. You wasted 4 seconds.

    • 回复: @Johnny Rico
  183. @AnonFromTN

    “I think your folly is that you are trying to rationalize greed. Greed is irrational, we inherited it from our irrational aggressively territorial cousins, monkeys.”

    I think your folly is rooted in your complete rejection of the concept that people have a spiritual nature (and because of that spiritual nature, people are susceptible to the spiritual force of “good” and/or “evil”).

    That said, you claim that our rulers are driven by “greed,” but they’re also liars and mass murderers, right? Apparently they also take pleasure in causing other people to suffer and die. Thus it’s clear that what you call “greed”, is not actually greed at all but a case of “demon-possession”; an extreme form of inherent evil.

    All you can say about them is that they’re “evil” and they do what they do because they’re evil, not because they’re “greedy.”

    “As to those people throwing rocks from the overpass of I-75, I think “Beavis and Butt-Head” answers your question. Hopeless stupidity of people totally lacking imagination, when it becomes active, is evil. But the people themselves are just unimaginative morons.

    So, my point is there is no such thing as evil per se, there is greed and stupidity (often the combination of the two) that leads to evil actions.”

    LOL! That’s about what I thought you’d say. But lots of people in this world could be deemed “stupid” “unimaginative morons” yet they aren’t willing to go to jail and trash their lives just for the pleasure of hurting and/or killing a complete stranger, right? Stupidity does not imply self-destructive sadism.

    So what motivated the “Unabomber” (Ted Kaczynski); stupidity? he supposedly had an IQ of 167. What motivated Edmund Kemper and Jeffrey Dahmer? They had IQs of 145 and 144 respectively. And there are many more examples of fiendishly evil serial killers who were apparently neither stupid nor unimaginative; what they were instead was “evil.”

    And how do you explain the case of someone who risks everything (i.e. his or her own life) to save a stranger, for example? Such a person is acting equally irrationally but in this case the objective is to do “good” rather than evil. Is such a person also a “stupid unimaginative moron”?

    Both types of cases are examples of human behavior motivated by spiritual forces of good and evil. Accept it.

    • 回复: @AnonFromTN
  184. anon[100]• 免责声明 说:
    @Authenticjazzman

    may be true that bs is being spewed, but that does not mean British cooking is not the worst on earth.

    And Germans do make superb cars.

  185. Davidson20 说:

    “they do what they do because they’re evil”

    No, human beings are usually better than their gods or demons:
    the ideas in the head, the mixture of ignorance, symbols and fanaticism

    “is not actually greed at all but a case of “demon-possession””

    Yes, ideological possession, that blinds them,
    and inability to see the other and put yourself in the other’s shoes

  186. AnonFromTN 说:
    @Harold Smith

    Greedy elites are liars and mass murderers because they have no moral scruples: they would think nothing of lying or murdering people just to get more money. If they can enrich themselves by doing something good, they won’t pass up that opportunity, either.

    You can call them evil, if you wish, but that worldview is the dead end: if there are inherently good and inherently evil people, you simply cannot do anything about that. You can promise rewards or punishments in the afterlife, but that would not prevent any crimes or get murdered people back to life here on Earth.

    If you look for causes of evil behavior instead, you have a chance to minimize or eliminate those causes, thereby minimizing evil behavior. That does not negate the spiritual nature of humans, unless by “spiritual” you mean supernatural.

    So, from my perspective, the views you propound are essentially defeatist. Personally, I do not think anyone is inherently predisposed to good or evil, you have to look for motives. Then you have a chance to motivate good behavior and demotivate evil one.

    However, let me tell you what I tell my students: if you are conventionally religious, you don’t want to discuss religion with me.

  187. @Johnny Rico

    Thanks for that Johnny. I’m sure that you also know that Saddam Hussein has weapons of mass destruction, Gadaffi is killing his own people, there is a civil war underway in Syria, Russia has invaded Ukraine and Israel is the only democracy in the ME.

    Oh, and there are no potholes in the roads of America, it being the worlds number one economy.

    继续…

  188. @AnonFromTN

    Here you go: “hundred million victims” is a lie…
    imaginary 100 million killed by the communists (the true number is likely ~10 million, most of them killed by Mao regime in China).

    事实核查:

    FALSE

    This statement is even more random and incoherent than your usual meaningless blabbering — if that’s possible.

    教育自己。

    Let go of your mindless hatred, and learn to be more tolerant.

    For your own sake.

    • 回复: @AnonFromTN
  189. “Greedy elites are liars and mass murderers because they have no moral scruples: they would think nothing of lying or murdering people just to get more money.”

    If the elite have power to pull off 9/11 and prevent an investigation; if they have power to commit all manner of war crimes anywhere and everywhere and never be held accountable; if they have power to squander trillions and trillions of dollars on pointless, hopeless wars and flawed overpriced weapon systems anything and everything under the sun; then what will overthrowing the government of Venezuela possibly do for them financially? All the money in the treasury and all the money they can print is essentially already theirs for the taking. It makes no sense whatsoever that they would risk nuclear war with Russia and China for a few hundred billion more that they might get out of Venezuela. They’re probably spending more money on the hopeless, pointless war in Afghanistan than they could squeeze out of Venezuela.

    I’m sorry but your “greed” argument really doesn’t stand the slightest logical scrutiny.

    “If they can enrich themselves by doing something good, they won’t pass up that opportunity, either.”

    What have they done that’s “good”? Anyway, when a serial killer rapes and murders a woman, he also takes the \$75 cash that she had in her purse; so according to you, such a crime is really all about “money”?

    “You can call them evil, if you wish, but that worldview is the dead end: if there are inherently good and inherently evil people, you simply cannot do anything about that.”

    LOL! But you can do something about what you claim is their “[insatiable] greed”?

    “You can promise rewards or punishments in the afterlife, but that would not prevent any crimes or get murdered people back to life here on Earth.”

    You’re changing the subject. All I’m doing is a process of observation and reasoning which leads me to a logical conclusion regarding extreme human behavior. And you reject that conclusion simply because it doesn’t sit well with your biases/presuppositions.

    “If you look for causes of evil behavior instead, you have a chance to minimize or eliminate those causes, thereby minimizing evil behavior.”

    I thought you said there’s no such thing as evil? Now you’re saying there is?

    “That does not negate the spiritual nature of humans, unless by ‘spiritual’ you mean supernatural.”

    su·per·nat·u·ral
    /ˌso͞opərˈnaCH(ə)rəl/
    形容词
    1.
    (of a manifestation or event) attributed to some force beyond scientific understanding or the laws of nature:
    “a supernatural being”
    同义词:
    paranormal, psychic, magic, magical, occult, … moreantonyms:
    natural, normal

    名词
    1.
    manifestations or events considered to be of supernatural origin, such as ghosts.

    When someone decides to go up on an overpass over a busy highway and throw rocks at cars so as to randomly injure and kill people – at the risk of going to prison for a long time, what is it exactly that causes this behavior? Is it “instinctive” behavior? No, apparently not. Is it something “physiological”? No, apparently not. Is it a pathological “brain chemical imbalance”? No, apparently not.

    Since whatever it is that causes these people to do these horrific acts is “beyond scientific understanding,” it is not incorrect to say that their behavior was caused by a “supernatural” force; a force I call the “spiritual” force of evil.

    “So, from my perspective, the views you propound are essentially defeatist.”

    LOL! So do you curse Isaac Newton when you slip and fall on the ice in your driveway? No? Then don’t blame me either. I didn’t create this universe; all I’m doing is sharing a conclusion based on observation and reasoning, just like Isaac Newton did. I’m sorry that you don’t like my conclusion but it is what it is.

    BTW speaking of “defeatist”: Here we are, dying creatures on a doomed planet, hurling aimlessly through space, with nuclear armed madmen in positions of power in the corrupt “West” threatening to unleash a nuclear holocaust on the planet as I type this, and you call my views “defeatist” for merely pointing out that there is such a thing as “evil”?

    “Personally, I do not think anyone is inherently predisposed to good or evil, you have to look for motives. Then you have a chance to motivate good behavior and demotivate evil one.”

    Seriously? What do you suggest it was that motivated Jeffrey Dahmer or Ted Bundy or the Green River killer? No amount of hand-waving can change the fact that there’s no satisfactory “worldly” explanation for this kind of evil. Of course you’re entitled to your own opinion, but you’re not entitled to be taken seriously, and I’m sorry to say I can’t take you seriously, on this topic at least.

    “However, let me tell you what I tell my students: if you are conventionally religious, you don’t want to discuss religion with me.”

    I can see that you’re a “religious” person, as you put a lot of “faith” in your greed theory of the universe, for example.

    I believe my views are somewhat more flexible than yours as I’m open to other points of view, but it’ll take more than hand-waving; you’ll have to proffer some kind of cogent argument.

    • 回复: @AnonFromTN
  190. AnonFromTN 说:
    @James Forrestal

    FYI, there books saying anything you want, and a lot of things you don’t want. There are books on Amazon saying that the Earth is flat. Sorry to disappoint, their existence does not make it flat. Same with this: what does this piece of propaganda prove? Talk is cheap, as you should know. Printed talk is even cheaper. Amazon is heavily censored, so the truth that Deep State dislikes is not sold there, whereas the lies it approves of are. You can find books on Amazon saying that homos are normal, but biology has a different opinion.

    BTW, if you do not like my posts, don’t read them, unless you re a masochist. That would be logical, no?

    Also, is your moniker “James Forrestal” commemorating a famous fire on the aircraft carrier of that name in 1967, started by a well-known “patriot”? He was not blamed for anything: his father and grandfather weren’t admirals for nothing. So, the name “James Forrestal” stands for lies and cover-ups. Most appropriate for your comment.

    • 同意: Sergey Krieger
    • 回复: @Johnny Rico
  191. anon[250]• 免责声明 说:

    205 James Forrestal says:

    Since you have read the book ,could you please enlighten us with the Soviet documents on this claims .
    Soviet opened their voluminous archives after 1990.

    BTW when will US declassify the pre 1980 documents . Don’t we need to know what exactly Uncle Shumel was doing all these times ?

  192. AnonFromTN 说:
    @Harold Smith

    It’s becoming repetitious. Last try. I am not going to explain every nutcase, like Dahmer, even psychiatrists cannot do that. That does not mean that every whacko is proof positive that something supernatural exists.

    As to money being spent on worthless weapons and clueless wars, it is YOUR money. Fat cats get a big cut out of it. Halliburton got \$10 billion no-bid contract out of Iraq war, whereas you and I wasted more than a trillion. Would have been cheaper just to give them those \$10 billion, but that won’t be “patriotic”. Key point is, fat cats are not spending their money, they are making more. In contrast, if they get a chance to rob Venezuela, or Russia, or Iran, they are going to make more money for themselves, which they won’t share with you.

    As to nukes and WWIII, we are supposed to be on the brink of a nuclear war ever since early 1960s. Doesn’t the fact that it did not happen in all these years tell you something?

    I rest my case, your honor.

    • 回复: @Harold Smith
  193. L.K 说:
    @Authenticjazzman

    Correction : 55000 American casualities, and 2.5 million NV losses.

    Hey, numbnuts,

    You corrected a BS post with the exact same BS. That’s pretty pathetic, ya know, even for you!

    For someone who claims to have been in the US military & to be so damn smart, you don’t seem to be able to even get the basics right.

    Casualties( not casualities) refer to

    In military usage, a casualty is a person in service killed in action, killed by disease, disabled by injuries, disabled by psychological trauma, captured, deserted, or missing, but not someone who sustains injuries which do not prevent them from fighting.

    The US suffered 58,220 KIA + 153,303 WIA + 1,590 MIA. Those were the US casualties in the Vietnam war. To those must be added the US allies, particularly the South Vietnamese military, who were quite a bit more numerous than the Americans and who suffered, KIA alone, between 250,000 to 313,000.

    As for the North Vietnamese regulars plus VCs, you have hugely inflated their military deaths.
    There appears to be new official data coming out of Vietnam, unfortunately they cover a longer period of warfare than what is generally considered to be the Vietnam war.

    According to the Vietnamese government’s national survey and assessment of war casualties (2017), there were 849,018 PAVN/VC military personnel dead or missing, including combat death and non-combat death, from the period between 1955 and 1975.[65] Based on unit surveys, a rough estimate of 30–40% of dead and missing were non-combat deaths.[65]

    “The official US Department of Defense figure was 950,765 communist forces killed in Vietnam from 1965 to 1974.
    Defense Department officials believed that these body count figures need to be deflated by 30 percent. For this figure, Guenter Lewy assumes that one-third of the reported enemy killed may have been civilians, concluding that the actual number of deaths of the VC and PAVN military forces was probably closer to 444,000.[11]”
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vietnam_War_casualties

    So obviously the PAVN/VC forces did quite well, considering the overwhelming firepower superiority on the US side, which also enjoyed numerical superiority.

  194. L.K 说:

    Trump’s Sanctions Make Economic Recovery in Venezuela Nearly Impossible
    The new financial embargo will worsen shortages, inflict suffering, and restrict Venezuela’s policy options.

    By Mark Weisbrot
    https://www.thenation.com/article/trumps-sanctions-make-economic-recovery-in-venezuela-nearly-impossible/

    Good stuff from Petras as well:
    美国帝国主义在拉丁美洲的特殊性
    詹姆斯·佩特拉
    https://www.unz.com/jpetras/peculiarities-of-us-imperialism-in-latin-america/

    https://www.unz.com/jpetras/us-regime-changes-the-historical-record/

  195. The matter of Vietmnam hasn’t any relevance to regime and even less to Venezuela.

    很好。

  196. WHAT 说:
    @Albionrevisited

    >jewcraine

    Dream on, Russia is taking everything on the continent lol. You can have 的课 syphilitic progenitors in Airstrip one.

  197. @EliteComminc.

    Jungle my man Jungle. Open spaces of Levant are quite another thing. (easy)

  198. @EliteComminc.

    笑。

    well of course if I dwell in a landscape in which all of the topography is considered the same: the mountains are as deserts, the deserts are as lush grasslands, the lush grasslands are as swamps, the swamps are as oceans and the oceans are as lakes — it’s all just one big — sameness.

    But for people seeking to navigate in reality, the contours, elements, conditions, of even one landscape makes a world of difference in navigating it’s myriad differences and contradictions. It aids in decision making. For example, pick axe is unlikely to have any value in navigating a lake and a life vest won’t be much but a burden in the desert (even against the rare flood).

    But I certainly comprehend why making these trouble some distinctions might be annoying and therefore shunned.

    Japan is to China as China is to Cambodia is to Loas . . . a close makes the case that none are the same . . . and a Japanese dictionary won’t do me much good in China . . .

  199. Let me explain something to you. Most of the people here are people who know each other they are dueling or forming combat crews combating each other. These groups do not like to accept foreigners like you and me. So we have one thing common we are the lonely ones. But besides that we have nothing in common. I am straight shooter to the point crude and ruthless.
    You know of course who you are. I certainly do not mind any comment addressed to me even if somebody calls me a arsehole. But on some other websites used to call me a lesbian bitch.

    • 回复: @EliteCommInc.
  200. @AnonFromTN

    Amazing. You are actually completely unaware of who Robert Conquest was.

    This is all anybody needs to know about you when you are discussing Russia.

    • 回复: @AnonFromTN
  201. @Ilyana_Rozumova

    Excuse me for misplacing the response. I assume this is for me.

    I was hoping you would actually indicate whether I understood you, concerning your comment.

    As general rule, (and more I hope) I don’t make personal attacks. I may go after a position, (argument), some area of analysis, but your person is not part of the exchange. I do work hard at keeping things to the issues, regardless how disturbing or personal an exchange may become — even personal.

    If as it appears I have made a strictly personal attack, excuse me. If you note a specific example, I will address it.

    The point of my initial comment is just its relevance and nothing more.
    The point to my second is the reasons why said comparison is irrelevant.

    • 回复: @Ilyana_Rozumova
  202. AnonFromTN 说:
    @Johnny Rico

    I am well aware who Robert Conquest was, as well as who he pretended to be, and whose money paid for this pretense (as well as for brainwashing people like you or that other commenter). That’s all I need to know about you and others who think they know something, but in reality only spit back the BS fed them by the Deep State.

    • 回复: @Johnny Rico
  203. @EliteCommInc.

    You are such a nice person, so I must be nice to you. So here it goes. It was my comment (to the point of the article) that it started it all. #95, Casandra responded with relative approval. From there it developed into two branches. No disrespect intended but your comment did came relatively at the end showing certain annoyance.
    So maybe if you will go through all related comments you will understand,

    • 回复: @EliteCommInc.
  204. @NoseytheDuke

    I think that it became US law in 1990 that the Pentagon had to adopt normal accounting rules like any US firm can manage. It took 28 years for them to openly fail. Trillions that can’t be accounted for just means that they are incapable of bookkeeping; it doesn’t prove corruption. If there was no corruption, they would still be incapable of bookkeeping.

    Do not despair. The recently announced changes to US Government accounting rules specifically allow lying about what taxes were spent on and which Department spent them. That makes Congressional oversight impossible and that is any US politician’s dream. They can’t be blamed if there is no way for them to know so none of them are complaining. Actually how could any US citizen complain about federal expenditure when they would merely prove that they were as ignorant as a Member of Congress or a Senator including all committee members?
    [电子邮件保护]

    • 回复: @NoseytheDuke
  205. @Donald A Thomson

    Should one infer from your comment that there has been no fraud or corruption going on at the Pentagon? With the quite evident revolving doors between people working in the government, the Pentagon and the MIC along with the exponential growth in funding, the reports of vast sums of money missing and the very convenient revelations of many extremely dubious accounting practices, I would say that a person would have to be remarkably naive to draw such a conclusion.

    • 回复: @Donald A Thomson
  206. @Ilyana_Rozumova

    笑。

    You don’t need to be nice. But your admonition sounds fair enough.

  207. @Ilyana_Rozumova

    Ah, got it.

    Despite not quite accurate with the casualty numbers, it is a myth that the US service men were befuddled by dense foliage, such as jungle warfare. While they did lose several engagements, their overall ability and determination in those environments proved very effective. And they did so with considerable smaller numbers.

    The real problem unlike that in Vietnam is that there is virtually no lines of demarkation. Vietnam did have some boundary designations, despite Vietcong incursions. And while that might be an issue initially, at the end of the day, it’s the power centers that matter and they are not located in remote jungle regions.

    In my view, Venezuela is none of our business. Regardless of the combat environments.

    • 回复: @Ilyana_Rozumova
  208. despite the comments in the cited reference — I tend to lean on the record of events and conclude the US won that conflict, but these references make clear that while jungle training is tough as in fighting period — but that environment did not prevent the US from winning.

    https://www.quora.com/Are-American-soldiers-trained-in-jungle-warfare-to-so-avoid-catastrophes-like-Vietnam

    it never fails that someone must do the add on that the US lost a Vietnam (nonsense) but it’s just the politically correct thing to say – despite being completely wrong.

    • 回复: @AnonFromTN
  209. AnonFromTN 说:
    @EliteCommInc.

    Rooftop evacuation is a sure sign of victory. I guess Germany won WWII, but very few people know it.

    • 同意: bluedog
  210. @EliteCommInc.

    You are torturing me. Naturally you are correct. But concerning the business, it is influenced by long term projection of yields from fracking in US. As for now we do not know what will be political outcome in Venezuela. And of course we do not know if eventually armed resistance will erupt against political outcome. I do have no doubt that five thousand US soldiers can take over the oilfields.
    But what would follow, we simply cannot know what would happen after.

  211. @Ilyana_Rozumova

    I must lean on my standard position . . .

    Venezuelans and its polity is the business of Venezuelans. I am not a socialist. I do not support communist or socialist fancies, especially those espoused by academics and their student acolytes.

    But my opposition to socialism, marxism and an asundary of “isms” need not lead me to support the sovereignty of other countries, no threat to the US.

  212. @Ilyana_Rozumova

    correction: But my opposition to socialism, marxism and an asundary of “isms” need not lead me to support violating the sovereignty of other countries, no threat to the US.

  213. Vojkan 说:

    The whole mental setup and behaviour of the neocons can be summed up in just four words: bullies in the schoolyard. They are certainly far less inteligent but they also have far more physical power at their disposal than the rest of the bunch.
    Everything from the “we create new realities and leave you to study them afterwards” to the recent regime-change endeavour in Venezuela confirms that definition. I don’t know if they behave like they behave because they have themselves been bullied in their childhood but the fact is they are retards with a lot of destructive power. The paucity of their dissertations leaves any educated reader in incredulity, their intellectual and moral bankruptcy becomes evident at once, and yet, disaster after disaster, they remain comfortably seated and continue lecturing, and it is quite astounding.
    The only way to stop a bully is to give him a bloody nose. So far, not a single neocon has had to suffer even a scratch for the millions of victims his actions have caused. As long as they don’t feel the hurt, they won’t feel compelled to change their behaviour. That simple.

    • 同意: NoseytheDuke
    • 回复: @Parbes
    , @Grace Poole
  214. @AnonFromTN

    “I am not going to explain every nutcase, like Dahmer, even psychiatrists cannot do that. That does not mean that every whacko is proof positive that something supernatural exists.”

    You say you can’t explain Dahmer’s behavior, and you acknowledge that psychiatrists can’t explain Dahmer’s behavior (or the behavior of millions of other Dahmers that walk the earth), so you resort to the vague catch-all term “nutcase”; yet by definition Dahmer’s behavior is a manifestation of something “supernatural.”

    When people do something it is generally in response to some kind of motivating “force”, right? For example, you took a drink of water because you were thirsty; so in a sense the physiological force of “thirst” motivated you to take a drink of water. Or perhaps you heard a loud, unexpected noise, and you turned around to see what made the noise, so in a sense the force of “instinct” motivated you to look to see what made the noise. But what about the case where you decided to drug your neighbor, and while he was sedated, you decided to drill a hole in his head and pour hydrochloric acid into the hole, with the hope of turning him into a “zombie.” That’s quite an imaginative act; what could motivate you to do that? Well since I’m sure you wouldn’t like it if your neighbor did that to you, and I wouldn’t like it done to me, it seems reasonable to think of it as an act of “evil”. So by way of simple logical reasoning, I have to conclude that your actions in that case were motivated by the “supernatural” (spiritual) force of “evil”.

    And you’re basically saying the same thing; you impliedly claim that Dahmer was motivated by the supernatural force of “nutcase,” whereas I claim he was motivated by the supernatural force of evil. Small world; you agree with me in principle, you just don’t like my choice of words.

    “As to money being spent on worthless weapons and clueless wars, it is YOUR money. Fat cats get a big cut out of it. Halliburton got \$10 billion no-bid contract out of Iraq war, whereas you and I wasted more than a trillion.”

    First, of course it’s my money and yours; isn’t it always? So what? Second, Halliburton isn’t making policy; billionaires like “Trump” are making policy.

    “Would have been cheaper just to give them those \$10 billion, but that won’t be ‘patriotic’.”

    Sure it would; they make the rules, so why not? Why, nowadays, giving \$10 billion to Israel for example, is the most patriotic thing you could do.

    “Key point is, fat cats are not spending their money, they are making more. In contrast, if they get a chance to rob Venezuela, or Russia, or Iran, they are going to make more money for themselves, which they won’t share with you.”

    As I endeavored to point out (and as you seem to be ignoring), we are at the point where “government” i.e., the people who are making policy, can basically do whatever they want without fear of any meaningful political or legal opposition. They don’t need flimsy excuses. Why would people who are filthy rich beyond the dreams of the average person risk nuclear war with Russia and/or China, for a few hundred billion of play money that they may or may not be able to squeeze out of Venezuela? I’m sorry but it makes no sense whatsoever.

    “As to nukes and WWIII, we are supposed to be on the brink of a nuclear war ever since early 1960s. Doesn’t the fact that it did not happen in all these years tell you something?”

    It tells me two things: (1) There’s a first time for everything; and (2) You’re apparently not very attentive to details.

    • 回复: @AnonFromTN
  215. Parbes 说:
    @Vojkan

    Exactly right! SERIOUS, PERSONAL CONSEQUENCES must be suffered by these scumbags. So far, the only Americans who have paid any sort of price for their actions have been some of the idiot cannon fodder sent to fight and kill at their behest; plus of course the hapless voting sheeple masses whose treasure pays for their global bullying and crimes.

  216. @Vojkan

    The only way to stop a bully is to give him a bloody nose. So far, not a single neocon has had to suffer even a scratch for the millions of victims his actions have caused. As long as they don’t feel the hurt, they won’t feel compelled to change their behaviour. That simple.

    惊人。
    Rabbi David Bar-Hayim and Catholic Rabble Rouser E Michael Jones AGREE:
    Pittsburgh Massacre is an expression of anger directed toward Jewish policies that they cannot control

    Bar-Hayim: “They believe that their identity as people of European culture . . . is in peril. The reason they feel this way is a direct result of the mass and irresponsible immigration policies of many European countries . . . and Jews are playing a substantial role in these policies.”

    琼斯:
    “If it’s legitimate for Jews to have snipers kill 93 children for “invading their country,” then why is it NOT legitimate for Jews to be killed for promoting invasion?”

  217. AnonFromTN 说:
    @Harold Smith

    You are right that every action has a motive. Nutcases see and hear things that don’t exist, and those hallucinations and voices motivate them just like the real things motivate normal people. If you want to call insanity supernatural, that’s your choice. I am a biologist, so I won’t.

    Halliburton is making policy (Dick Cheney, anyone?), and so do all big corporations, by contributing to PACs and helping their puppets advance in politics. They are so successful that at the moment you can count honest people in Congress on the fingers of one hand.

    We are not at the point where the government can safely do what it wants without “explanations” (we are moving in the direction of “1984”, but we are not there yet). So, they invent “explanations”, push false narratives directly and via MSM, etc. The fact that they actually lie profusely (which you can hardly deny) shows that they need to. They can’t just steal your tax money openly, they have to launder their loot through “patriotic” “defense” spending, etc. So, they couldn’t just give money to Halliburton, Blackwater, and others of their ilk, they had to stage that whole charade with WMDs, “war on terror”, and other BS to fool the populace, bring out “patriotic” fervor in the stupidest, just to let that scum steal our money, while committing numerous war crimes (which they won’t admit, but just in case the US does not recognize the authority of the UN war crimes tribunal).

    For those thieves the oil riches of Iraq, Venezuela, or even Syria are coveted loot, but they maneuver to reduce the chances that the countries that can bloody the imperial nose (like Russia or China) will interfere. So, they invent false claims of WMDs, “bringing democracy”, “use of chemical weapons”, and other lies in the hopes that nobody interferes with their robbery and the morons at home “patriotically” support their actions. We are not all dead yet due to that maneuvering. But I agree that in their blinding greed they skate on thinner and thinner ice.

  218. “If you want to call insanity supernatural, that’s your choice. I am a biologist, so I won’t.”

    I want to call evil, evil, and you want to call it anything else but what it is. You’re being dishonest to the point of absurdity, and that’s your choice. And I choose to not waste any more time arguing absurdities with you.

    • 回复: @Erebus
  219. @NoseytheDuke

    There is more than enough to be suspicious as hell. A cynic like me thinks that when there is an opportunity for corruption, it will exist. I am even so cynical that I believe that when opportunities for corruption are created that is often on purpose. Just don’t accept my bias as proof. Sometimes things happen because of stupidity or laziness. [电子邮件保护]

  220. AnonFromTN 说:
    @Johnny Rico

    Very substantive answer. To be expected. Deep State did a thorough job.

  221. Erebus 说:
    @Harold Smith

    I want to call evil, evil, and you want to call it anything else but what it is.

    You won’t understand, but AnonfTN may get a chuckle out of an old linguistic philosophy saw proving that English is superior to all other languages…
    “Consider something as simple as water. The French call it . As usual, the French aren’t even close. The Romans got closer with 旱厕。 德国人 WASSER almost captures it, but only the English correctly call it . Just look at it, it’s obviously water!”

    • 回复: @Mike P
    , @Hibernian
  222. Miro23 说:

    Here’s the official UK take on Venezuela from William Hague, ex Leader of the Conservative Party, and ex UK First Secretary of State and Foreign Minister:

    It should be enough to know that Corbyn (Labour leader), were he to be prime minister, would be aligned with Putin rather than Merkel and Macron. But even more telling is the justification he uses for his position – hostility to “outside interference”. This is the language of authoritarian rulers the world over, the constant refrain of those who fear a compassionate and responsible world coming to the aid of people they have impoverished and oppressed.

    “每日电讯报”

    This is Britain’s “compassionate and responsible” elite speaking about supposedly defending the “impoverished and oppressed”.

    • 回复: @AnonFromTN
  223. AnonFromTN 说:
    @Miro23

    Classical 100% pure hypocrisy. What else is new?

  224. Mike P 说:
    @Erebus

    “The thing that’s wrong with the French is that they don’t have a word for entrepreneur!”

    • 哈哈: Erebus
  225. Hibernian 说:
    @Erebus

    Everyone here speaks, reads, and writes English. Your remark is pointless.

    • 回复: @Erebus
  226. Erebus 说:
    @Hibernian

    Indeed they do, and one hopes at least some will get both the irony and the point.

  227. Robjil 说:

    Watch for March 21 2019. It is Purim. 2003 Purim March 17, Iraq invaded. 2011 Purim March 20, Libya invaded. The timing is getting close. Will the US and friends attempt something in Iran or Venezuela around Purim time this year?

  228. Anonymous [AKA "BTTerry"] 说:

    Bolton’s unintentional intentional leak was his quantified estimate of the influence-capital he has with Trump in terms of killed U.S. soldiers in Venezuela, such estimate being mass communicated to other power-crazed, geostrategically-befuddled, and mentally-depleted Zionist criminals to gain control of Venezuelan oil without re-activating the Vietnam syndrome in equally sated-, geostrategically-befuddled, and mentally-depleted co-Zionists in Congress.

  229. journey80 说:

    “Does this bizarre mix of Neocons, gerontocrats and deepstaters really, sincerely, believe that this time around they will “win” (however you define that)?!

    “More relevantly – has this recipe ever worked in the past?”…

    Depends on how you define “winning,” and depends on who cares. Who benefits from endless wars, especially losing wars? You got it. The Neocons, gerontocrats, Republicrats, Demopublicans, deepstaters, and war industry whores who get their cut of the ballooning “defense” budgets. These endless losing wars are the neocon plan – along with the endless freak show that is designed to distract from them.

当前评论者
说:

发表评论-对超过两周的文章发表评论,将在质量和语气上进行更严格的判断


 记得 我的信息为什么?
 电子邮件回复我的评论
$
提交的评论已被许可给 Unz评论 并可以由后者自行决定在其他地方重新发布
在翻译模式下禁用评论
通过RSS订阅此评论主题 通过RSS订阅所有The Saker评论