Unz评论•另类媒体选择
美国主流媒体大都排除了有趣,重要和有争议的观点
 博客浏览米歇尔·马尔金(Michelle Malkin)档案
嘿,美联社:你​​至少欠我 132,125 美元!
扭转局势。
通过电子邮件将此页面发送给其他人

 记住我的信息



=>

书签 全部切换变革理论添加到图书馆从图书馆中删除 • B显示评论下一个新评论下一个新回复了解更多
回复同意/不同意/等等 更多... 这个评论者 这个线程 隐藏线程 显示所有评论
同意不同意谢谢LOL轮唱
这些按钮可将您的公开协议,异议,感谢,LOL或巨魔与所选注释一起注册。 仅对最近使用“记住我的信息”复选框保存姓名和电子邮件的频繁评论者可用,并且在任何八个小时的时间内也只能使用三次。
忽略评论者 关注评论者
搜寻文字 区分大小写  确切的词  包括评论
列表 书签

1apcharge.jpg

(Photoshop 信用: 丑陋的美国人)

The Internet firestorm over the Associated Press’s heavy-handed attempt to bully bloggers over fair use article excerpts has been absolutely schadenfreude-licious. Now, it’s time to turn the tables. If your blog or blog commenters have ever been quoted by the AP, listen up: It’s time to prepare a bill and demand payment.

First, a quick recap: AP showered a left-wing site with 停止信, 提示 many political and tech sites to 抵制 AP content. The latest 骚动 涉及 AP’s pricing scheme charging bloggers $2.50/字 and then scaling for excerpt usage. Here’s a screenshot of the media giant’s web usage 协议:

apfee2.jpg

So they wanna play that game?

Ok, let’s play. Tongue planted firmly in cheek, of course. Unlike the AP, bloggers 欣赏 getting linked and excerpted. That is how we roll in the 21st century.

But let’s apply AP standards for the hell of it. I have found two recent examples of the AP quoting from this blog without linking to the quoted posts or obtaining my consent for a usage agreement. In 四月, AP quoted from the 评论主题 in this post about Absolut’s Aztlan vodka ad:

保守派专栏作家米歇尔·马尔金 (Michelle Malkin) 运营的网站 michellemalkin.com 上发布了十几条抵制绝对伏特加 (Absolut) 的呼吁。这些广告在其他六个网站和博客上引发了激烈的评论。

“在绝对伏特加的世界里,一家生产伏特加的公司解雇了整个营销部门,在一场灾难性的广告活动适得其反后,绝望地试图赢回愤怒的北美客户,”一位名为“SalsaNChips”的人士在马尔金的网站上写道。

That’s 42 words. Cha-ching-ching-ching.

In XNUMX年XNUMX月XNUMX日, AP again quoted from this blog, excerpting the column I posted online about the keffiyeh kerfuffle:

The kaffiyeh, Malkin wrote in a column posted online last Friday, “has come to symbolize murderous Palestinian jihad. Popularized by Yasser Arafat and a regular adornment of Muslim terrorists appearing in beheading and hostage-taking videos, the apparel has been mainstreamed by both ignorant (and not-so-ignorant) fashion designers, celebrities, and left-wing icons.”

That’s 44 words. Cha-ching-ching-ching.

据美联社报道, it has:

-1,700 U.S. daily, weekly, non-English and college newspapers;

-5,000 radio and television outlets taking AP services; and

– 850 AP Radio News audio affiliates.

Let’s assume, for the sake of argument, that half of all those clients published the AP dispatches quoting this blog’s content without prior usage agreement (which would be 3,775) and let’s apply the exact same fee structure AP wants to impose on the blogosphere ($17.50 for 26-50 words). I calculate that the AP owes me:

$66,062.50 x 2 = $132,125.

(A substantial portion of that sum would go to commenter SalsaNChips, of course. See? Commenting at MichelleMalkin.com pays! Well, theoretically.)

There may be other articles that quoted blog content from MichelleMalkin.com网站HotAir.com. I’m keeping a look out.

And there are a few other bloggers quoted recently by AP who should consider sending joke bills, too.

Take Patterico, whose enterprising work on the Judge Kozinski case I 提到 this morning. The AP quoted from one of his blog posts just 昨天。 样本:

A federal appeals court judge under scrutiny for sexually explicit videos and photos posted on a personal Web site is the victim of distortions and “outright lies” published by the Los Angeles Times, his wife charged Monday.

Marcy Jane Tiffany, wife of 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Chief Judge Alex Kozinski, described some of the material stored on the home computer as raunchy and juvenile. Only about a half-dozen files among hundreds had a “sexual aspect,” but they were not pornography, she said.

“Alex is not into porn — he is into funny — and sometimes funny has a sexual character,” Tiffany wrote in a nearly 2,000-word defense of her husband, posted on a Web site called patterico.com.

And it goes on. Writes 帕特里科 今晚:

In a news item about the e-mail from Judge Kozinski’s wife that I posted on this site, an AP article lifted numerous passages.

I counted 154 words quoted from my post. That’s almost twice the number of words contained in the most extensive quotation in the Drudge Retort.

So am I going to be an ass and threaten to charge them, or sue them, or demand that they remove the quotes? Of course not. They benefited from my content and I benefited from their link.

如果他 做了 decide to send a bill under the terms of my table-turning fee structure, that would be:

$50 per URL= 3,775 x $50=$188,750.

Dude. That’s a hefty windfall. Sure you don’t wanna reconsider?

More potential blogger debt collectors:

*The Stranger blog

*Actress/blogger Zhang Ziyi

*赫芬顿邮报

*Musician/blogger Pete Wentz

*A blogger at Glamocracy

*一个 American Idol fan blogger

If your blog content/comment threads have been quoted by the AP, let me know what your bill would be. If you’d like to design/photoshop a generic joke bill or AP usage agreement plan that we can fill in and send to AP, please feel free to send along!

MSM thuggery is the disease. Mockery is the best medicine.

***

The blogosphere lets it rip:

From Jim Lynch: “Going beyond what has already been reported, the AP has expanded their current position and announced that they now own the rights to all words, phrases and letters of the alphabet, and will be charging bloggers accordingly.” Triple-snort!

1apalacarte.jpg

黑桃王牌: “Here’s my counter-offer: I will limit the the words actually quoted from AP stories, limiting myself to paraphrase and direct quotes of relevant officials. (AP can’t copyright someone else’s words — at best, they can pitch an unfair trade practices beef, but that’s a harder case to make.) Furthermore, I will no longer provide any links to any AP stories anywhere, and in fact may not even bother to mention the story comes from AP. I will cite instead a “news organization.” If AP wants a link, it can begin paying me $25.00 per link. I charge for advertising. There’s my counter-offer. It’s not negotiable.”

DoublePlusUndead: Fun with ellipses!

Charles Johnson: “If they plan to enforce this mind-bogglingly stupid policy, it will be interesting to see what happens with sites like Digg.com — which are nothing but excerpts from news articles, with hundreds of AP stories being posted every day.”

Via Brian at 快照,谁一直 纠缠 在他自己的 blogger battle with AP:

1apcharge002.jpg

AP has managed to bring left and right bloggers together like never before. Check out 备忘录:

1apmeme.jpg

Macsmind’s tab:$ 6,300。

便笺 devises a handy quote-a-meter to help you calculate how much you’ll owe AP if you excerpt them. Still looking for someone to make one of these for AP to calculate how much they owe us.

鲍勃·欧文斯: Where’s my fact-checking fee? Har.

(经作者或代表的许可从MichelleMalkin.com重新发布)
 
• 类别: 思想 •标签: 博客圈, “纽约时报”