Unz评论•另类媒体选择
美国主流媒体大都排除了有趣,重要和有争议的观点
 博客浏览米歇尔·马尔金(Michelle Malkin)档案
航空安然:弗兰肯再次讲话
通过电子邮件将此页面发送给其他人

 记住我的信息



=>

书签 全部切换变革理论添加到图书馆从图书馆中删除 • B显示评论下一个新评论下一个新回复了解更多
回复同意/不同意/等等 更多... 这个评论者 这个线程 隐藏线程 显示所有评论
同意不同意谢谢LOL轮唱
这些按钮可将您的公开协议,异议,感谢,LOL或巨魔与所选注释一起注册。 仅对最近使用“记住我的信息”复选框保存姓名和电子邮件的频繁评论者可用,并且在任何八个小时的时间内也只能使用三次。
忽略评论者 关注评论者
搜寻文字 区分大小写  确切的词  包括评论
列表 书签

Cue the violins. Get out the Kleenex. The 纽约邮报 John Mainelli reports that Air America host Al Franken is playing the victim card:

Al Franken says 20,000 poor kids and old people weren’t the only victims of an exec who allegedly arranged a Bronx charity’s mega-buck “loan” to Air America.

“About three weeks into the life of Air America, I became an involuntary investor — I stopped being paid,” Franken told listeners yesterday on WLIB (1190 AM).

It was the first time the all-liberal network’s biggest star addressed at length a controversial $875,000 loan from the disgraced — and now de-funded — Gloria Wise Boys & Girls Club…

Haven’t listened to it yet, but yesterday’s show is available for downloading 此处 (MP3)。

更新: Brainster 的博客 has isolated the clip of Franken’s discussion of the scandal–with lots of inappropriate laughter and a reference to me as “the bottom of the barrel.”

“There’s more to talk about…But it’s boring.”

Uh-huh. Listen to the whole thing.

更新二: 莱昂 H. 猛男纳乔斯...

The Post has some other information in here, and it’s difficult to determine whether Franken re-iterated these things on the air yesterday, or whether they are recapitulations of old quotes [MM note: He said them on the air]:

“I think [Evan Cohen] was robbing Peter to pay Paul,” Franken said, adding that the network’s current owners, Piquant LLC, did some “forensic accounting” and learned about the defaulted loan.

Franken said Piquant didn’t legally have to pay back the loan, “but we morally do, so they started to make arrangements to pay it back.

As we have covered in detail before, both of these statements have now been called into serious question by the DOI – which leads us to ask why Franken keeps repeating them. Most especially, we remain curious as to why, if Piquant does not legally have to repay the loan, the DOI is involved in the repayment process. I would think that if someone took me to court over some money, and it was determined that I had no legal obligation to repay the money, but I decided to go ahead and do it anyway out of the goodness of my heart, the court would not get involved in how I repay the money I don’t legally owe. Of course, I’ve never been dragged into court for defrauding a charity of close to a million dollars, so I could be way off base, here.

In the meantime, we continue our countdown to the day that the New York Times will first notice this story, in any shape, form or fashion…

RightWingDuck spoofs at IMAO: Feed Air America Radio!

(经作者或代表的许可从MichelleMalkin.com重新发布)
 
• 类别: 思想 •标签: 航美, 铝弗兰肯