Unz评论•另类媒体选择
美国主流媒体大都排除了有趣,重要和有争议的观点
 博客浏览米歇尔·马尔金(Michelle Malkin)档案
Inside Air America:调查博客报告
通过电子邮件将此页面发送给其他人

 记住我的信息



=>

书签 全部切换变革理论添加到图书馆从图书馆中删除 • B显示评论下一个新评论下一个新回复了解更多
回复同意/不同意/等等 更多... 这个评论者 这个线程 隐藏线程 显示所有评论
同意不同意谢谢LOL轮唱
这些按钮可将您的公开协议,异议,感谢,LOL或巨魔与所选注释一起注册。 仅对最近使用“记住我的信息”复选框保存姓名和电子邮件的频繁评论者可用,并且在任何八个小时的时间内也只能使用三次。
忽略评论者 关注评论者
搜寻文字 区分大小写  确切的词  包括评论
列表 书签

第二部分无线电均衡器。

Brian Maloney and I take a close look at the financial plans of Sheldon and Anita Drobny, the deep-pocketed, far left Illinois Democrat couple who dreamed up Air America and have been involved in its many strange and dubious business reorganizations. The key questions that curious radio industry veterans, financial observers, skeptical investors, and business reporters should be asking Air America:

What is Nova M? And why now?

Drobnys.jpg

***

同时,本 纽约时报 attempts to explain its slowness on the story. Ombudsman Byrone Calame:

[I]t seems to me that this story is still unfolding, and The Times, for the sake of all its readers, needs to get to the bottom of any improper conduct and assess Air America’s future.

We’re not waiting.

***

More on Calame…

埃德·莫里西:

If the Times wants us to believe that it objectively reports the news, especially that which occurs in its own back yard, then we expect to see some in-depth coverage of the apparent fraud involving Piquant Media, Progress Media, Air America, and Gloria Wise, and not just a bloodless regurgitation of facts already well known to anyone with an Internet connection.

Medicarity:

Barney whipped out his Sherlock Holmes hat and magnifying glass, conducted a thorough investigation, and found that the Times is not a liberal newspaper! Yup, here are his exact words: “There’s another reason to get to the bottom of the scandal. It’s the perception problem — a perception of liberal bias for which I haven’t found any evidence after checking with editors at the paper.”

Reassuring, isn’t it? Liberal bias at the Times does not exist. It is a “perception” problem “inspired by conservative bloggers.” It is all in your imagination. The Great Oz has spoken! Besides, Calame has proof. He called the editors who ignored the Air America story, and they denied that liberal bias was the reason. So the Times is not liberal. Time to go back to the divan.

托马斯·利夫森在 美国思想家:

Mediacrity is justifiably stunned that he cannot uncover any evidence of bias. But I also find it stunning that he admits his search for bias consists of asking the editors. They will never admit their bias because they don’t see it. And neither does Calame.

***

莱昂 H. 猛男纳乔斯:

Yet more activity from the Drobnys that skates right on the borderline of legal and illegal, and wanders squarely into the territory of slimy.

I don’t want to belabor the point that Brian has already hammered home with great efficiency, but this Nova M maneuver is the most Enron-esque move we’ve seen from the Drobnys and their Air America partners, yet. Switch the name “Drobny” with “Fastow” and you’ve got something straight out of Conspiracy of Fools. Will Al Franken condemn this shell game maneuvering?

(经作者或代表的许可从MichelleMalkin.com重新发布)
 
• 类别: 思想 •标签: 航美, 铝弗兰肯