Unz评论•另类媒体选择$
美国主流媒体大都排除了有趣,重要和有争议的观点
 博客浏览米歇尔·马尔金(Michelle Malkin)档案
懦弱的美国公司
通过电子邮件将此页面发送给其他人

 记住我的信息



=>

书签 全部切换总目录添加到图书馆从图书馆中删除 • B
显示评论下一个新评论下一个新回复了解更多
回复同意/不同意/等等 更多... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
同意不同意谢谢LOL轮唱
这些按钮可将您的公开协议,异议,感谢,LOL或巨魔与所选注释一起注册。 仅对最近使用“记住我的信息”复选框保存姓名和电子邮件的频繁评论者可用,并且在任何八个小时的时间内也只能使用三次。
忽略评论者 关注评论者
搜寻文字 区分大小写  确切的词  包括评论
列表 书签

当新的企业觉醒爆发在我们硕果累累的平原上爆发时,我不再愤怒地冒泡。 这只是贪婪之地和奴隶之家悲惨生活的又一天。 也就是说:在最高法院推翻罗伊诉韦德案的裁决之后,本周美国公司大肆宣传“医疗保险”,为那些想要前往受计划生育的国家摧毁未出生婴儿的生命的员工。

你知道,我也知道,这些公司并没有出于同情或原则而向工人提供“健康”福利(翻译:胎儿谋杀补贴)。 它甚至不是简单的财务计算。 是的,当然,支付工人的快速旅行以消除不便的生活比为延长产假买单要便宜得多。 但底线是这样的:企业堕胎狂热是由极度恐惧和对文化威权主义的颤抖遵从驱动的。

美国资本主义觉醒的恶霸(LOL)根本不是真正的恶霸。 他们是中国制造商品和全球同质化服务的黄腹拉皮条,是政权的俘虏——而不是队长。 他们对抵制感到羞愧,对负面新闻感到恐惧(看看 XNUMX 月份百事可乐在 abortifa 将百事可乐捐赠给德克萨斯州共和党后发生了什么)。 因此,他们屈服于在线和地面上歇斯底里的少数可悲的哈里达人的暴力威胁愤怒。

迪克体育用品公司的首席执行官劳伦霍巴特在她的领英账户上宣布,该公司“已准备好确保我们所有的队友都能一致且安全地获得我们提供的福利,无论他们居住在哪个州。” 这意味着每名工人、配偶或受抚养人的堕胎费用超过 4,000 美元。 户外服装零售商 Patagonia 紧随其后,在新闻稿中充斥着关于“关心”员工“选择”的黏糊糊的言论。 再次:大声笑。

没有人会被大企业的领导者用“我的身体,我的选择”的言辞所愚弄。 (你好,阿拉斯加航空公司、谷歌、花旗集团、苹果、微软、摩根大通、哥伦比亚运动服、耐克、阿迪达斯、优步、Netflix、迪士尼等等等等)一切都是表演剧场。 永远不要忘记:那些无情地打击戴口罩的自闭症幼儿和老年人的公司——也就是那些威胁、惩罚和开除疫苗反对者的公司——现在正在大声吹嘘他们的“关怀文化”、“公平”和承诺神圣的医疗保健“权利”。 COVID-19 暴政的企业执法者现在是堕胎作为医疗保健极端主义的企业执法者,因为这是环城公路沼泽法令和 TikTok 暴徒所要求的。

已故的持不同政见的剧作家和捷克总统瓦茨拉夫·哈维尔在他的“蔬菜水果商”寓言中揭露了当今觉醒的旗帜挥动的动机,详细描述在他 1978 年的开创性文章“无权者的力量”中:

一位店主在他的杂货店橱窗里放了一个牌子,上面写着:“全世界的工人,联合起来!”

立即订购

“他为什么要这么做?” 哈维尔问道。 一个答案:避免冲突。 “如果他拒绝,可能会有麻烦。 他可能会因为他的窗户没有适当的装饰而受到责备。 甚至有人会指责他不忠。 他这样做是因为如果要在生活中相处,就必须做这些事情。” 这是投降和顺从的信号。

“我,蔬菜水果商 XY,住在这里,我知道我必须做什么。 我按照对我的期望行事。 我可以被依赖并且无可非议。 我很听话,因此我有权安静地离开,”哈维尔破译了标语牌的标语。 “当然,这条信息有一个收件人:它直接指向蔬菜水果商的上级,同时它是保护蔬菜水果商免受潜在告密者的保护”(或现代网上告密者和愤怒制造商)。

共产主义意识形态,就像今天的企业觉醒意识形态一样,“是人类可以隐藏自己堕落的存在、琐碎化和对现状的适应的面纱,”哈维尔宣称。 “这是每个人都可以使用的借口,从蔬菜水果商(他以所谓的对世界工人统一的利益为由掩饰对失业的恐惧)到最高层的官员,他们对保持权力的兴趣可以被掩盖用关于为工人阶级服务的短语。”

这些腐败的美国公司和他们上下的同志比他们或我们认为的要弱。 堕胎是谋杀,而不是医疗保健。 1+1 = 2。无知是深渊。 如果每个公民都认真地在自己的生活中做自己的事情,而不是恐惧,那么无权者的力量就无法压制。

米歇尔·马尔金(Michelle Malkin)的电子邮件地址是 [电子邮件保护]

 
• 类别: 思想 •标签: 流产, 政治上的正确, 罗伊 - 涉 
隐藏33条评论发表评论
忽略评论者...跟随Endorsed Only
修剪评论?
  1. 我的印象是,即使不是大多数,美国公民中的极少数(如果不是大多数)真的只是不想被这种乏味的生活所困扰。 左派是无情的,虽然绝不是统一的社会工程巨头。 如果左派退缩,不是承认他们的计划有误,也不是承认他们的前进方向有误,而是暂时让右派得到喘息的机会,这将被视为胜利的标志。 然后,当机智迟钝而人民安抚时,左派继续向他们所看到的任何光荣未来进军。 几十年来,这一直是左派的策略。 他们从不停止。
    右翼,尤其是反堕胎运动采用了左翼所使用的策略,并无情地推动了反堕胎议程。 推翻罗伊花了几十年的时间。 基于支持生命运动的成功,有可能激发足够多的人口来实现特定目标。 然而,正如现代美国人已经变得多样化、分裂和颓废,我不相信在理智层面上的另一场胜利是可能的,因为推翻罗伊是可能的。
    我只希望这不会变成一场代价高昂的胜利! 想象一下在蓝州激起的反应。

    • 回复: @Emslander
    @巴克斯特


    我的印象是,即使不是大多数,美国公民中的极少数(如果不是大多数)真的只是不想被这种乏味的生活所困扰。
     
    The endless self-delusion in the USA that it is somehow richer, stronger, more up to date and special will have to be punctured before we learn to live, as you say. Anglin pointed out that you can drop into nearly any country around the planet and find yourself in a cleaner, more advanced and more convenient surrounding than flying into any of our most famous cities. Just try flying anywhere. It is an experience very similar to tales of torture by brutal oriental regimes of the 1600's.

    我们不再知道生活是什么。 我的农民祖父在他位于中西部的农产品农场一年中每天工作数小时的生活比目前在债券销售或股票经纪中苦苦挣扎的任何人都要好得多。
    , @Veracity
    @巴克斯特

    反堕胎者并没有建立政治多数派来取得胜利(尽管第四修正案是这样说的)。 凭借运气和作伪证的证词,他们推翻了最高法院。

  2. 对极权主义左派的激烈谴责。 说得好! 同样重要的是要记住,大多数公司都遵循政治趋势。 对他们来说,这一切都与盈利能力有关。 而已。 毕竟,这些都是上市公司。 他们对股东负责。 股东价值是第一位的。

    因此,大多数企业实体都关心诸如提高盈利能力、促进产品创新、削减成本、改善客户关系和占领市场份额等日常事务。 而已。 只有少数主要企业(传统媒体、娱乐和社交媒体)深入参与政治问题、新闻分析、标题建设、新闻审查和传播宣传。 正是这些公众认知的顶级操纵者/策展人值得我们高度关注。 有时还蔑视。

    企业不同。 巨大的。 有很大的不同 在文化影响 例如,在通用汽车和 Facebook 或谷歌等公司之间。 这个事实必须考虑。

    • 回复: @Achmed E. Newman
    @马克绿色

    Though we agree on ideology in general, Mark, I don't agree with what you wrote about Big Biz (at least) companies being all about profitability anymore. After all, there have been Feral Government bail-outs of different industries in the past, so they can count on that if they kiss government ass which means following the woke narrative.

    It's not just the HR ladies* now. Corporate big-wigs are almost all craven cowards now. 他们只代表清醒的路线,以牺牲能力、利润和员工士气为代价。

    马尔金夫人提到了员工因不接受功夫流感疫苗而被解雇的事件。 由于那些被解雇的护士以及一些因vax而生病的护士,护士严重短缺。 他们正在推动更多地雇用来自菲律宾的移民。

    OTOH,某些大型航空公司已经放弃了对新员工的要求,因为他们现在非常需要飞行员。 几个月前,他们在要求已经在飞行的飞行员全部拍摄的战斗中失败了。 反击是有代价的。

    XNUMXD压花不锈钢板 峰值愚蠢 新闻 will have more on this later this week or next, plus something related, retail Big Biz's push for the elimination of cash. They'd love for things to be just as Orwellian as they are in China. We'll post an anecdote later today.

    .

    * 峰值愚蠢 on The HR ladies - scourge of the business world:
    部分1
    部分2
    图表 A:托比弗兰德森
    部分3

    回复:@Fidelios自动机

    , @Sir Launcelot Canning
    @马克绿色


    对他们来说,这一切都与盈利能力有关。 而已。
     
    I don't buy this at all. If it was really profits and "nothing more," then corporations would stay out of it. Why would they risk alienating part of their customer base, like Gillette, Coca-Cola, or Disney did? No, corporations are afraid of something or someone.

    回复:@mark green

    , @HallParvey
    @马克绿色


    毕竟,这些都是上市公司。 他们对股东负责。 股东价值是第一位的。
     
    公司是合法的虚构。 它们主要存在于特拉华州的政府记录中。 另一方面,它们的所有者通常被多层银行、股票经纪人和其他法律虚构所掩盖。

    And, surprise, surprise. Guess what demographic makes up the vast majority of the stock holding owners. The same people who own the Mighty Wurlitzer. Yep. Them. If a corporation doesn't obey their dictates, sorry, suggestions, people might get fired.

    Ever heard of "Jimmy the Greek"?
    , @Wilson Z.
    @马克绿色

    I fully agree about corporate profit motivated by greed. But a “totalitarian Left”? Really? Is this re-birth of Uncle Joe Stalin? Give me a break!

    回复:@Achmed E. Newman

  3. @mark green
    Fiery rebuke to the totalitarian Left. Well said! It's also important to remember that most corporations follow political trends. For them, it's all about profitability. Nothing more. These are publicly-traded companies, after all. They are accountable to their shareholders. And shareholder value comes first.

    Most corporate entities are therefore concerned with mundane matter such as increasing profitability, boosting product innovation, cutting costs, improving customer relations, and capturing market share. That's it. Only a handful of major businesses (legacy media, entertainment, and social media) are deeply involved in political issues, news analysis, headline construction, news censorship, and disseminating propaganda. It's these top level manipulators/curators of public perception which deserve our utmost attention. And sometimes contempt.

    Corporations differ. Hugely. There's an enormous difference 在文化影响 例如,在通用汽车和 Facebook 或谷歌等公司之间。 这个事实必须考虑。

    Replies: @Achmed E. Newman, @Sir Launcelot Canning, @HallParvey, @Wilson Z.

    尽管我们在意识形态上大体上是一致的,马克,但我不同意你所写的关于大企业(至少)公司不再关注盈利能力的说法。 毕竟,过去曾有过野蛮政府对不同行业的救助,所以如果他们亲吻政府的屁股,这意味着遵循清醒的叙述,他们可以指望这一点。

    现在不仅仅是 HR 女士*。 企业大人物现在几乎都是胆怯的懦夫。 他们只代表清醒的路线,以牺牲能力、利润和员工士气为代价。

    马尔金夫人提到了员工因不接受功夫流感疫苗而被解雇的事件。 由于那些被解雇的护士以及一些因vax而生病的护士,护士严重短缺。 他们正在推动更多地雇用来自菲律宾的移民。

    OTOH,某些大型航空公司已经放弃了对新员工的要求,因为他们现在非常需要飞行员。 几个月前,他们在要求已经在飞行的飞行员全部拍摄的战斗中失败了。 反击是有代价的。

    XNUMXD压花不锈钢板 峰值愚蠢 新闻 本周晚些时候或下周将有更多关于这方面的内容,以及一些相关的内容,零售大企业推动消除现金。 他们希望事情像在中国一样像奥威尔式一样。 我们将在今天晚些时候发布一个轶事。

    .

    * 峰值愚蠢 on 人力资源女士——商业世界的祸害:
    部分1
    部分2
    图表 A:托比弗兰德森
    部分3

    • 回复: @Fidelios Automata
    @艾希迈德·纽曼(Achmed E.Newman)

    All woke HR managers and employees should be fired. They're a scourge on our nation.

  4. 解决方案是尽可能在当地购物并支持小型企业。

    百思买可能支持堕胎/骄傲/BLM,您当地的无名电子商店可能不支持。 您当地的商店可能没有积分计划或同样巨大的销售额,但作为回报,您可以保留自己的灵魂。

  5. 左派赢了。 在我看来,所有最大的公司和可能大多数中型公司都已经融合了。 他们都有人力资源部门,都是左派。 当政府提出他们的左翼计划时,他们中的大多数人会立即采取行动。 我不记得有很多公司没有双脚跳上Covid火车。 有一些,但我记得那些都是较小的实体。

    选举没有任何意义。 假设我们能够克服选举中的舞弊,并设法让共和党人占据多数席位,那么他们自己只会继续左翼议程。 例如特朗普,据我所知,至少在三个月前,他仍然是一名 vax 啦啦队长。 特朗普:“疫苗从未伤害过任何人。” 我猜他不会读书。 所以我们对 2024 年最大的希望是他?

    好消息是,因为左派控制了一切,这意味着一切都注定了。 这些人无法经营柠檬援助摊位,所以他们会毁掉一切,包括他们自己。 让我们希望他们至少不使用核武器。

  6. 马尔金女士说对了一半。 对于公司而言,这与金钱有关,但与公众赞誉无关。 公司希望劳动力中的女性能够使劳动力数量翻倍并降低工资。 要求在工作场所平等对待女性的规则是企业的一大胜利,因为它们大幅降低了每个人的工资。 现在有很多女性的工作场所(通常是员工工作),公司不希望这些女性因意外怀孕而离开工作岗位。 因此,堕胎在企业医疗服务菜单上非常重要。 理想的公司员工是同性恋或女同性恋夫妇的成员,稳定,富裕,没有孩子。 下一级理想的企业员工是单身女性(比单身男性更稳定)。 该公司希望保留他们的单身女性单身和少生孩子。 最不受欢迎的公司员工是已婚家庭成员。 在已婚家庭类型中,最不受欢迎的是妈妈(或潜在妈妈),因为怀孕时间、产假以及幼儿对父母的不断要求。 如果有公司堕胎福利,您可以肯定会有使用福利而不是生育孩子的压力。 如果您查看大多数员工支付一部分费用的企业健康保险,员工需要“选择”家庭或儿童保险并支付大量费用(通常相当于典型活产的费用),甚至选择家庭健康保险。 必须在怀孕开始之前选择该福利才能获得怀孕保险。 对企业态度的真正“说明”将是堕胎保险将提供给所有人,“家庭”和怀孕保险将只提供给那些支付额外保费的人。 公司的信息很明确,当你为我们工作时没有孩子。

    • 回复: @anon
    @哈里亨廷顿

    你总结得很好。

    没有孩子的无人机坐在隔间里玩着他们幼稚的电子玩具。

  7. 真理永远在少数,少数永远比多数强大,因为少数一般是由真正有意见的人组成的,而多数的力量是虚幻的,由没有意见的团伙组成——和因此,谁在下一刻(显然少数人更强大)采取了自己的意见,然后变成了多数人的意见,也就是说,由于全体[群众]站在自己一边,而真理再次成为废话。恢复为新的少数派。

    关于真理,这个麻烦的怪物,大多数人,公众等等,就像我们所说的一个为了恢复健康而旅行的人一样:他总是落后一站。

    克尔凯郭尔

  8. 所以我们对 2024 年最大的希望是他?

    我希望没有太多爱国的美国人真的相信这一点,乔治。 不,这不对。

    我会给他这个:唐纳德特朗普可以举行一场伟大的集会。 他让人们参与进来。 我讨厌这样说,因为无论他是多么的胡说八道和不称职的经理,我都喜欢这个人,但是:我们最好的选择是特朗普/德桑蒂斯的票,特朗普代表普雷斯,因为他的自我赢了不要让他做任何其他事情,特朗普在第一周左右就踢了它。 我知道,这样说不好,但这对国家来说是最好的。

    哦,不,我认为选举也不能治愈这个国家的弊病。 财务上的愚蠢几乎达到了顶峰,它将使系统崩溃。 所有其他的愚蠢? 一旦 SHTF,它就停止了! (好吧,除非我们去共产主义,这根本不是不可能的。)

    无需感谢,读者。 我很高兴来到这里为每个人照亮一天!

  9. 我最近阅读了 Kara Dansky 的“废除性:跨性别议程如何伤害妇女和女孩”。 她是一名堕胎权利活动家,我觉得这个职位令人震惊。 然而,即使是像丹斯基这样的铁杆左翼分子也开始意识到,企业的觉醒并不是为了帮助任何人;而是为了帮助任何人。 这是关于贪婪和控制。

  10. @Achmed E. Newman
    @马克绿色

    Though we agree on ideology in general, Mark, I don't agree with what you wrote about Big Biz (at least) companies being all about profitability anymore. After all, there have been Feral Government bail-outs of different industries in the past, so they can count on that if they kiss government ass which means following the woke narrative.

    It's not just the HR ladies* now. Corporate big-wigs are almost all craven cowards now. 他们只代表清醒的路线,以牺牲能力、利润和员工士气为代价。

    马尔金夫人提到了员工因不接受功夫流感疫苗而被解雇的事件。 由于那些被解雇的护士以及一些因vax而生病的护士,护士严重短缺。 他们正在推动更多地雇用来自菲律宾的移民。

    OTOH,某些大型航空公司已经放弃了对新员工的要求,因为他们现在非常需要飞行员。 几个月前,他们在要求已经在飞行的飞行员全部拍摄的战斗中失败了。 反击是有代价的。

    XNUMXD压花不锈钢板 峰值愚蠢 新闻 will have more on this later this week or next, plus something related, retail Big Biz's push for the elimination of cash. They'd love for things to be just as Orwellian as they are in China. We'll post an anecdote later today.

    .

    * 峰值愚蠢 on The HR ladies - scourge of the business world:
    部分1
    部分2
    图表 A:托比弗兰德森
    部分3

    回复:@Fidelios自动机

    所有醒来的人力资源经理和员工都应该被解雇。 他们是我们国家的祸害。

    • 同意: Achmed E. Newman
  11. 不幸的是,堕胎是必要的。 47% 的黑人女性怀孕流产。 黑人非常混杂。 如果不进行堕胎,她们的出生率将从每名妇女 1.9 胎增加到每名妇女 3.8 胎。 按照这样的速度,他们将在 1 年内占美国人口的 2/50。 保守派是否想成为黑人人口中的极少数?

    在非洲,她们的生育率为每名妇女 4.4 个孩子。 他们的人口将在未来 28 年内翻一番,达到 2.5 亿。 到 2100 年,他们将拥有超过 4 亿人口。 谁来养活他们? 没有人,.. 所以他们将向北迁移到欧洲,被喂饱。

    • 同意: mark green, anarchyst
    • 回复: @Abelard Lindsey
    @ruralguy

    This is worth considering in another perspective. Most "right-leaning" people such as myself tend to be quasi-libertarian. We're into classical liberalism. The so-called alt-right or neo-reaction began emerging on the internet about 10 years ago in reaction to this, driven by the consideration of bio-diversity. However, the problem with the far-right is that they are driven to pursue anti-liberty agendas, of which the basis of, have strayed considerably away from issues of bio-diversity. A good example is immigration.

    , @Emslander
    @ruralguy

    I do really feel sorry for you. It's not just the racism. It's the absolute failure of anyone or anything in your life to have struck a single spark of love for your fellow human beings. It must be very dark in there.

    Replies: @ruralguy, @Achmed E. Newman

  12. @mark green
    Fiery rebuke to the totalitarian Left. Well said! It's also important to remember that most corporations follow political trends. For them, it's all about profitability. Nothing more. These are publicly-traded companies, after all. They are accountable to their shareholders. And shareholder value comes first.

    Most corporate entities are therefore concerned with mundane matter such as increasing profitability, boosting product innovation, cutting costs, improving customer relations, and capturing market share. That's it. Only a handful of major businesses (legacy media, entertainment, and social media) are deeply involved in political issues, news analysis, headline construction, news censorship, and disseminating propaganda. It's these top level manipulators/curators of public perception which deserve our utmost attention. And sometimes contempt.

    Corporations differ. Hugely. There's an enormous difference 在文化影响 例如,在通用汽车和 Facebook 或谷歌等公司之间。 这个事实必须考虑。

    Replies: @Achmed E. Newman, @Sir Launcelot Canning, @HallParvey, @Wilson Z.

    对他们来说,这一切都与盈利能力有关。 而已。

    我根本不买这个。 如果它真的是利润并且“仅此而已”,那么公司就会置身事外。 为什么他们会冒着疏远部分客户群的风险,就像吉列、可口可乐或迪士尼那样? 不,公司害怕某事或某人。

    • 回复: @mark green
    @朗塞洛特·坎宁爵士


    如果 [企业行为] 真的 [只是] 利润并且“仅此而已”,那么企业将 [远离 Woke 十字军东征]。
     
    Yes, you are correct. But it wasn't always this way. Before the 60s, the war against Whites in America was little more than a Black and Jewish fantasy. America was still mostly unashamed and proudly White Christian.

    In today's America, there are diversity and inclusion dictates, anti-discrimination laws, and countless NGO's which continuously pressure (and sometimes orchestrate boycotts) of companies that do not hire enough gays, Blacks, and women, or 尽自己的一份力量 to actively suppress speech deemed 'hateful' (by the usual suspects.) Blackness is celebrated like never before, and unattractive Black faces are now ubiquitous in US film and television. This is actually a relatively new phenomenon.

    I recall back in the 80s, as a small businessman in San Francisco, I had to prove that I was in no way directly--or even indirectly--involved with any dealings with the White South Africa government as well as any US-based companies still doing business in Apartheid South Africa--in order to conduct business with the City of SF. Incredible, but true.

    我必须向纽约市填写一份冗长的多页申请,才能摆脱这种(潜在的)罪恶。 从那以后,这些政治化的入侵只会变得更糟。

    美国的左翼激进主义已经成为一般个人自由,特别是白人利益的毒瘤。

    Ironically, today--另一个种族隔离国家--is not only protected from boycott and treated as sacred in Washington, but it is 无条件补贴 由我们的道德上司支配,他们支配着我们的民选政府、非民选的深层政府,并统治着我们的媒体。

    也许最糟糕的是,那些敢于抵制犹太复国主义实体(或与被认为对以色列怀有敌意的国家进行贸易)的少数公司或个人可能会根据美国法律面临刑事处罚。

  13. @mark green
    Fiery rebuke to the totalitarian Left. Well said! It's also important to remember that most corporations follow political trends. For them, it's all about profitability. Nothing more. These are publicly-traded companies, after all. They are accountable to their shareholders. And shareholder value comes first.

    Most corporate entities are therefore concerned with mundane matter such as increasing profitability, boosting product innovation, cutting costs, improving customer relations, and capturing market share. That's it. Only a handful of major businesses (legacy media, entertainment, and social media) are deeply involved in political issues, news analysis, headline construction, news censorship, and disseminating propaganda. It's these top level manipulators/curators of public perception which deserve our utmost attention. And sometimes contempt.

    Corporations differ. Hugely. There's an enormous difference 在文化影响 例如,在通用汽车和 Facebook 或谷歌等公司之间。 这个事实必须考虑。

    Replies: @Achmed E. Newman, @Sir Launcelot Canning, @HallParvey, @Wilson Z.

    毕竟,这些都是上市公司。 他们对股东负责。 股东价值是第一位的。

    公司是合法的虚构。 它们主要存在于特拉华州的政府记录中。 另一方面,它们的所有者通常被多层银行、股票经纪人和其他法律虚构所掩盖。

    而且,惊喜,惊喜。 猜猜哪些人口构成了绝大多数股票持有者。 拥有 Mighty Wurlitzer 的人。 是的。 他们。 如果一家公司不遵守他们的指令、抱歉、建议,人们可能会被解雇。

    听说过“希腊人吉米”吗?

  14. 我的看法有点不同。 这是一个左翼自夸与企业贪婪相吻合的案例。 对于公司来说,支付员工堕胎费用要比支付生育和抚养孩子的医疗福利以及因家庭责任造成的时间损失要便宜得多。 企业财务经理认为这是双赢的。

    covid-19 疫苗也是如此。 公司管理层接受了疫苗“安全有效”的说法。 既然所有的疫苗伤害(和死亡)都出现了,那么公司有必要对受伤的疫苗提起大规模诉讼,让公司知道这根本不是事实。

  15. @ruralguy
    Abortion, unfortunately, is necessary. 47% of all Black women's pregnancies are aborted. Black people are extremely promiscuous. Without abortion, their birthrate would double from 1.9 births per woman to 3.8 births per woman. At those rates, they would be 1/2 of the U.S. population within 50 years. Do conservatives want to be a tiny minority in a largely black population?

    在非洲,她们的生育率为每名妇女 4.4 个孩子。 他们的人口将在未来 28 年内翻一番,达到 2.5 亿。 到 2100 年,他们将拥有超过 4 亿人口。 谁来养活他们? 没有人,.. 所以他们将向北迁移到欧洲,被喂饱。

    Replies: @Abelard Lindsey, @Emslander

    这值得从另一个角度考虑。 大多数像我这样的“右倾”人往往是准自由主义者。 我们进入古典自由主义。 大约 10 年前,出于对生物多样性的考虑,互联网上开始出现所谓的 alt-right 或 neo-reaction。 然而,极右翼的问题在于,他们被驱使追求反自由议程,其基础已经大大偏离了生物多样性问题。 一个很好的例子是移民。

  16. @Baxter
    我的印象是,即使不是大多数,美国公民中的极少数(如果不是大多数)真的只是不想被这种乏味的生活所困扰。 左派是无情的,虽然绝不是统一的社会工程巨头。 如果左派退缩,不是承认他们的计划有误,也不是承认他们的前进方向有误,而是暂时让右派得到喘息的机会,这将被视为胜利的标志。 然后,当机智迟钝而人民安抚时,左派继续向他们所看到的任何光荣未来进军。 几十年来,这一直是左派的策略。 他们从不停止。
    右翼,尤其是反堕胎运动采用了左翼所使用的策略,并无情地推动了反堕胎议程。 推翻罗伊花了几十年的时间。 基于支持生命运动的成功,有可能激发足够多的人口来实现特定目标。 然而,正如现代美国人已经变得多样化、分裂和颓废,我不相信在理智层面上的另一场胜利是可能的,因为推翻罗伊是可能的。
    我只希望这不会变成一场代价高昂的胜利! 想象一下在蓝州激起的反应。

    Replies: @Emslander, @Veracity

    我的印象是,即使不是大多数,美国公民中的极少数(如果不是大多数)真的只是不想被这种乏味的生活所困扰。

    正如你所说,在我们学会生活之前,必须打破美国无休止的自我幻想,即它在某种程度上更富有、更强大、更先进和更特别。 安格林指出,与飞往我们任何最著名的城市相比,您几乎可以飞往地球上的任何国家,并发现自己处于一个更清洁、更先进、更方便的环境中。 尝试在任何地方飞行。 这种经历与 1600 年代残酷的东方政权的酷刑故事非常相似。

    我们不再知道生活是什么。 我的农民祖父在他位于中西部的农产品农场一年中每天工作数小时的生活比目前在债券销售或股票经纪中苦苦挣扎的任何人都要好得多。

  17. @ruralguy
    Abortion, unfortunately, is necessary. 47% of all Black women's pregnancies are aborted. Black people are extremely promiscuous. Without abortion, their birthrate would double from 1.9 births per woman to 3.8 births per woman. At those rates, they would be 1/2 of the U.S. population within 50 years. Do conservatives want to be a tiny minority in a largely black population?

    在非洲,她们的生育率为每名妇女 4.4 个孩子。 他们的人口将在未来 28 年内翻一番,达到 2.5 亿。 到 2100 年,他们将拥有超过 4 亿人口。 谁来养活他们? 没有人,.. 所以他们将向北迁移到欧洲,被喂饱。

    Replies: @Abelard Lindsey, @Emslander

    我真的为你感到难过。 这不仅仅是种族主义。 你生命中的任何人或任何事都绝对没有为你的同胞点燃爱的火花。 里面一定很黑。

    • 回复: @ruralguy
    @艾姆斯兰德

    I don't blame you for your overly effeminate feelings, Emslander. The schools long ago gave up on teaching grammar, leaving you unable to perceive the world with distinctions and unable to use critical thinking.

    To you, everyone is equal — there are no distinctions between civilized people and murderers, thieves, perverts, and terrorists. You see any type of behavior as acceptable. You can't see distinctions. Flood the country with scammers, drug dealers, and parasites from failed third world countries — we are all the same. We should all join hands, celebrate queers, rainbows, and the diversity of crayons. Never mind the ensuing chaos. It’s not real after all. Only emotions are real.

    What's especially interesting among you overly effeminate preachers is the lack of walking your talk. Seattle is perhaps the most left-wing city in the nation, but the moral goody-two shoes ultra-liberal moms and dads that infest this city, don't want to their own children integrated. 1/3 of all children in this ultra-left paradise are enrolled in private school, safe from the lower classes, while their ultra liberal parents preach endlessly about discrimination and racism. That 1/3 figure is low, also, because its the rich and sanctimonious liberal caste that rules the city are the only ones who can afford private school, so overrepresent the 1/3 figure.

    在过去的 100 年里,你们左撇子谋杀了 100 亿人,但在你们高度情绪化的女性化思想中,你们不会做错事。 现实可以忽略。 像你这样的左撇子,Emslander 只是天生的假胡说八道。 可惜你看不到。

    回复:@Emslander

    , @Achmed E. Newman
    @艾姆斯兰德

    I meant to write earlier, Emslander, but Mr. Rural Guy defended his point already. "The Truth shall set you free", says John 8:32. I have no inclination to check his stats, so I assume there was nothing untruthful in what Rural Guy wrote.

    I am also pretty against abortion, when it comes down to it. However, that doesn't mean that, yeah, the black dysfunction that has been a big part of the ruin of this country won't become even bigger due to the facts above.

    It sounds like going off the subject here, but Mr. Steve Sailer has often written about how NY City Mayor Guiliani's "Stop and Frisk" policies did a good job of keeping crime down in that city by taking guns off of black guys. Well, the Stop & Frisk policy is obviously unConstitutional under Amendment 4 as it involves unreasonable searches (not like that has been stopping the TSA for 20 years!). Do I agree with Mr. Sailer that the policy should be re-implemented? NO.

    In these matters of practicality vs. principles, I go with the principles. However, that doesn't mean that I don't give the other side that points out facts credit for that. What do you do? Find other solutions, that's what you do. Personally, I won't ever live in NY City, and there won't be any abortions with me involved (too old for that anyway). Federalism, however, at least gives us a chance to live where our principles are upheld, to some extent. The Dobbs ruling was a great example.

    Also, remember that there's nothing hateful about telling the truth. There is something hateful about liars.

    回复:@Emslander,@HallParvey

  18. @Harry Huntington
    Ms Malkin is half right. For corporations it is about the money, but it is not about public accolades. Corporations wanted women in the work force to double the labor pool and bid down wages. Rule requiring equal treatment for women in the workplace were a big corporate win because they dramatically bid down wages for everyone. Now that there are workplaces teeming with women (usually in staff jobs) corporations don't want those women leaving work with unplanned pregnancy. Hence, abortion is very much on the corporate medical services menu. The ideal corporate employee is a member of a homosexual or lesbian couple, stable, affluent, no children. The next level ideal corporate employee is the single woman (more stable than the single man). The corporation would like to keep their single female single and child less. The least desired corporate employee is a married family person. Of the married family types, the very least desirable is the mom (or potential mom) because of pregnancy time, maternity leave, and the constant demands placed on parents by young children. If there is a corporate abortion benefit, you can be sure there will be pressure to use the benefit instead of having children. If you look at most corporate health insurance where employees pay a portion of the cost, an employee needs to "elect" for family or child coverage and pay a substantial fee (usually equivalent to the cost of a typical live birth) even to elect family health coverage. That benefit has to be elected before a pregnancy begins for there to be pregnancy coverage. The real "tell" on corporate attitude will be that the abortion coverage will be available to all, the "family" and pregnancy coverage will be available only to those who pay the extra premium. The corporate message is clear, no children while you work for us.

    回复:@anon

    你总结得很好。

    没有孩子的无人机坐在隔间里玩着他们幼稚的电子玩具。

  19. @Emslander
    @ruralguy

    I do really feel sorry for you. It's not just the racism. It's the absolute failure of anyone or anything in your life to have struck a single spark of love for your fellow human beings. It must be very dark in there.

    Replies: @ruralguy, @Achmed E. Newman

    我不会因为你过于女性化的感觉而责备你,Emslander。 学校早就放弃了语法教学,让你无法区分世界,无法使用批判性思维。

    对你来说,每个人都是平等的——文明人和凶手、小偷、变态者和恐怖分子之间没有区别。 你认为任何类型的行为都是可以接受的。 你看不到区别。 来自失败的第三世界国家的骗子、毒贩和寄生虫充斥着这个国家——我们都是一样的。 我们都应该携手,庆祝酷儿、彩虹和蜡笔的多样性。 更不用说随之而来的混乱。 毕竟这不是真的。 只有情绪是真实的。

    在你们这些过于女性化的传教士中,特别有趣的是缺乏言行一致。 西雅图或许是全国最左翼的城市,但在这个城市肆虐的道德双鞋超自由主义的爸爸妈妈们,并不想把自己的孩子融入其中。 在这个极左的天堂里,有 1/3 的孩子就读于私立学校,远离下层阶级,而他们的极端自由主义父母则无休止地宣扬歧视和种族主义。 这 1/3 的数字也很低,因为统治这座城市的富有和道貌岸然的自由种姓是唯一能负担得起私立学校的人,所以 1/3 的比例过高。

    在过去的 100 年里,你们左撇子谋杀了 100 亿人,但在你们高度情绪化的女性化思想中,你们不会做错事。 现实可以忽略。 像你这样的左撇子,Emslander 只是天生的假胡说八道。 可惜你看不到。

    • 回复: @Emslander
    @ruralguy

    劳驾?

    I'm a 75-year-old white Germanic Hitler sympathizer with five grown children and 13 grandchildren. I doubt that this knowledge will change your song and dance very much because your ability to grasp social reality is obviously depraved, but there you go.

    回复:@但是谦虚的工匠

  20. @Sir Launcelot Canning
    @马克绿色


    对他们来说,这一切都与盈利能力有关。 而已。
     
    I don't buy this at all. If it was really profits and "nothing more," then corporations would stay out of it. Why would they risk alienating part of their customer base, like Gillette, Coca-Cola, or Disney did? No, corporations are afraid of something or someone.

    回复:@mark green

    如果 [企业行为] 真的 [只是] 利润并且“仅此而已”,那么企业将 [远离 Woke 十字军东征]。

    是的,你是对的。 但并不总是这样。 在 60 年代之前,美国与白人的战争只不过是黑人和犹太人的幻想。 美国仍然大多是无耻和自豪的白人基督徒。

    在当今的美国,存在多元化和包容性要求、反歧视法和无数非政府组织,它们不断向那些没有雇佣足够多的同性恋、黑人和女性的公司施压(有时还策划抵制),或者 尽自己的一份力量 积极压制被认为是“仇恨”的言论(通常的嫌疑人)。黑人以前所未有的方式庆祝,不吸引人的黑人面孔现在在美国电影和电视中无处不在。 这实际上是一个相对较新的现象。

    我记得在 80 年代,作为旧金山的一名小商人,我必须证明我没有直接或间接参与与南非白人政府以及任何美国公司的任何交易。在种族隔离的南非开展业务——以便与旧金山市开展业务。 难以置信,但真实。

    我必须向纽约市填写一份冗长的多页申请,才能摆脱这种(潜在的)罪恶。 从那以后,这些政治化的入侵只会变得更糟。

    美国的左翼激进主义已经成为一般个人自由,特别是白人利益的毒瘤。

    讽刺的是,今天——另一个种族隔离国家——不仅在华盛顿不受抵制和被视为神圣,而且 无条件补贴 由我们的道德上司支配,他们支配着我们的民选政府、非民选的深层政府,并统治着我们的媒体。

    也许最糟糕的是,那些敢于抵制犹太复国主义实体(或与被认为对以色列怀有敌意的国家进行贸易)的少数公司或个人可能会根据美国法律面临刑事处罚。

  21. @Emslander
    @ruralguy

    I do really feel sorry for you. It's not just the racism. It's the absolute failure of anyone or anything in your life to have struck a single spark of love for your fellow human beings. It must be very dark in there.

    Replies: @ruralguy, @Achmed E. Newman

    我本来打算早点写的,埃姆斯兰德,但农村人先生已经为他的观点辩护了。 约翰福音 8 章 32 节说:“真理必使你自由”。 我不想检查他的统计数据,所以我认为农村人写的没有什么不真实的。

    归根结底,我也非常反对堕胎。 然而,这并不意味着,是的,已经成为这个国家毁灭的重要组成部分的黑人功能障碍不会因为上述事实而变得更大。

    这听起来像是跑题了,但史蒂夫·塞勒先生经常写到纽约市市长吉利亚尼的“拦截和搜身”政策如何通过从黑人手中夺走枪支,很好地控制了该市的犯罪活动。 好吧,根据第 4 修正案,Stop & Frisk 政策显然是违宪的,因为它涉及不合理的搜查(不像那样已经停止了 TSA 20 年!)。 我是否同意 Sailer 先生关于应该重新实施该政策的观点? 不。

    在这些实用性与原则的问题上,我遵循原则。 然而,这并不意味着我不会给予指出事实的另一方的功劳。 你做什么工作? 寻找其他解决方案,这就是你要做的。 就个人而言,我永远不会住在纽约市,而且我不会参与任何堕胎(无论如何都太老了)。 然而,联邦制至少在某种程度上让我们有机会生活在我们的原则得到维护的地方。 多布斯的裁决就是一个很好的例子。

    另外,请记住,说真话并没有什么可恨的。 说谎者有一些可恨的地方。

    • 谢谢: ruralguy
    • 回复: @Emslander
    @艾希迈德·纽曼(Achmed E.Newman)

    The condition of many black people in this country isn't the result of considering them fellow human beings. It's the result of the immoral abortionist liberal mentality that treats poor people of all races as if they are inferior human beings.

    I'm a very conservative Roman Catholic who grew up living with black families, going to school with black children, serving with black soldiers and working with blacks of all abilities. Killing black people in the womb is probably the lowest of all the liberal race policies of the FDR era. It's you and rural guy who are sick.

    回复:@Achmed E. Newman

    , @HallParvey
    @艾希迈德·纽曼(Achmed E.Newman)


    约翰福音 8 章 32 节说:“真理必使你自由”。
     
    约翰撒谎了。

    回复:@Achmed E. Newman

  22. @ruralguy
    @艾姆斯兰德

    I don't blame you for your overly effeminate feelings, Emslander. The schools long ago gave up on teaching grammar, leaving you unable to perceive the world with distinctions and unable to use critical thinking.

    To you, everyone is equal — there are no distinctions between civilized people and murderers, thieves, perverts, and terrorists. You see any type of behavior as acceptable. You can't see distinctions. Flood the country with scammers, drug dealers, and parasites from failed third world countries — we are all the same. We should all join hands, celebrate queers, rainbows, and the diversity of crayons. Never mind the ensuing chaos. It’s not real after all. Only emotions are real.

    What's especially interesting among you overly effeminate preachers is the lack of walking your talk. Seattle is perhaps the most left-wing city in the nation, but the moral goody-two shoes ultra-liberal moms and dads that infest this city, don't want to their own children integrated. 1/3 of all children in this ultra-left paradise are enrolled in private school, safe from the lower classes, while their ultra liberal parents preach endlessly about discrimination and racism. That 1/3 figure is low, also, because its the rich and sanctimonious liberal caste that rules the city are the only ones who can afford private school, so overrepresent the 1/3 figure.

    在过去的 100 年里,你们左撇子谋杀了 100 亿人,但在你们高度情绪化的女性化思想中,你们不会做错事。 现实可以忽略。 像你这样的左撇子,Emslander 只是天生的假胡说八道。 可惜你看不到。

    回复:@Emslander

    劳驾?

    我是一个 75 岁的白人日耳曼希特勒同情者,有 13 个成年子女和 XNUMX 个孙子孙女。 我怀疑这些知识会极大地改变你的歌舞,因为你掌握社会现实的能力显然是堕落的,但你去吧。

    • 回复: @but an humble craftsman
    @艾姆斯兰德

    these people have lost their bearing at least 80 years ago.

    One would say nevermind but for the havoc they are wreaking.

  23. @Achmed E. Newman
    @艾姆斯兰德

    I meant to write earlier, Emslander, but Mr. Rural Guy defended his point already. "The Truth shall set you free", says John 8:32. I have no inclination to check his stats, so I assume there was nothing untruthful in what Rural Guy wrote.

    I am also pretty against abortion, when it comes down to it. However, that doesn't mean that, yeah, the black dysfunction that has been a big part of the ruin of this country won't become even bigger due to the facts above.

    It sounds like going off the subject here, but Mr. Steve Sailer has often written about how NY City Mayor Guiliani's "Stop and Frisk" policies did a good job of keeping crime down in that city by taking guns off of black guys. Well, the Stop & Frisk policy is obviously unConstitutional under Amendment 4 as it involves unreasonable searches (not like that has been stopping the TSA for 20 years!). Do I agree with Mr. Sailer that the policy should be re-implemented? NO.

    In these matters of practicality vs. principles, I go with the principles. However, that doesn't mean that I don't give the other side that points out facts credit for that. What do you do? Find other solutions, that's what you do. Personally, I won't ever live in NY City, and there won't be any abortions with me involved (too old for that anyway). Federalism, however, at least gives us a chance to live where our principles are upheld, to some extent. The Dobbs ruling was a great example.

    Also, remember that there's nothing hateful about telling the truth. There is something hateful about liars.

    回复:@Emslander,@HallParvey

    这个国家许多黑人的状况并不是将他们视为同胞的结果。 这是不道德的堕胎自由主义心态的结果,将所有种族的穷人视为低等人。

    我是一个非常保守的罗马天主教徒,在黑人家庭中长大,与黑人孩子一起上学,与黑人士兵一起服役,并与各种能力的黑人一起工作。 杀死腹中的黑人可能是罗斯福时代所有自由种族政策中最低的。 生病的是你和农村人。

    • 回复: @Achmed E. Newman
    @艾姆斯兰德

    OK, I guess the truth is sick to you. What if I told you that inflation has not been 1 - 1.5 % for the last 2 decades as the BLS has told us (got to keep those indexed increases low), when it's been more like 4-5% for about every product or service I've made long-term calculations on? Would you find that sick? OK, that doesn't get you emotionally bothered. However, RuralGuy was simply giving out stats. That's sick to you?

    Neither of us brought up the INTENTION of those who would support abortion simply to kill black or any other babies. I don't believe it was an FDR-era thing either. How could that be? Roe v. Wade was decided in 1973. FDR died (thankfully for us) in 1944. I will say that he, and then his FRD-on-steroids 2-decade later acolyte Lyndon Johnson, who caused the bulk of the black dysfunction that we're are burdened with today. The Welfare State has rewarded the irresponsible and punished the responsible among us for 55 years now. It's very dysgenic. Do you want that?

    I've worked with very responsible black people here and there for years. However, they are not the problem. It's the violence and destruction out of the many young black men in this Anarcho-Tyranny we live under that's the problem. You know that, but you don't want to be "a hater", so I get that.

  24. @Achmed E. Newman
    @艾姆斯兰德

    I meant to write earlier, Emslander, but Mr. Rural Guy defended his point already. "The Truth shall set you free", says John 8:32. I have no inclination to check his stats, so I assume there was nothing untruthful in what Rural Guy wrote.

    I am also pretty against abortion, when it comes down to it. However, that doesn't mean that, yeah, the black dysfunction that has been a big part of the ruin of this country won't become even bigger due to the facts above.

    It sounds like going off the subject here, but Mr. Steve Sailer has often written about how NY City Mayor Guiliani's "Stop and Frisk" policies did a good job of keeping crime down in that city by taking guns off of black guys. Well, the Stop & Frisk policy is obviously unConstitutional under Amendment 4 as it involves unreasonable searches (not like that has been stopping the TSA for 20 years!). Do I agree with Mr. Sailer that the policy should be re-implemented? NO.

    In these matters of practicality vs. principles, I go with the principles. However, that doesn't mean that I don't give the other side that points out facts credit for that. What do you do? Find other solutions, that's what you do. Personally, I won't ever live in NY City, and there won't be any abortions with me involved (too old for that anyway). Federalism, however, at least gives us a chance to live where our principles are upheld, to some extent. The Dobbs ruling was a great example.

    Also, remember that there's nothing hateful about telling the truth. There is something hateful about liars.

    回复:@Emslander,@HallParvey

    约翰福音 8 章 32 节说:“真理必使你自由”。

    约翰撒谎了。

    • 回复: @Achmed E. Newman
    @霍尔帕维

    He was talking about one's soul, not his status under American 无政府主义暴政,帕维先生。

  25. @Emslander
    @艾希迈德·纽曼(Achmed E.Newman)

    The condition of many black people in this country isn't the result of considering them fellow human beings. It's the result of the immoral abortionist liberal mentality that treats poor people of all races as if they are inferior human beings.

    I'm a very conservative Roman Catholic who grew up living with black families, going to school with black children, serving with black soldiers and working with blacks of all abilities. Killing black people in the womb is probably the lowest of all the liberal race policies of the FDR era. It's you and rural guy who are sick.

    回复:@Achmed E. Newman

    好吧,我想事实让你感到恶心。 如果我告诉你,在过去 1 年中,通货膨胀率并没有像美国劳工统计局告诉我们的那样(必须保持这些指数涨幅保持在低水平),而当时几乎所有产品或服务的通货膨胀率都接近 1.5-2%,那会怎样?我做了长期的计算? 你会觉得有病吗? 好吧,这不会让你在情绪上受到困扰。 然而,RuralGuy 只是给出了统计数据。 这对你有病吗?

    我们俩都没有提出那些支持堕胎只是为了杀死黑人或任何其他婴儿的意图。 我也不相信这是罗斯福时代的事情。 怎么可能? 罗伊诉韦德案于 1973 年判决。罗斯福于 1944 年去世(感谢我们)。我会说他,然后是 2 年之后他的 FRD-on-steroids 助手林登约翰逊,他造成了大部分黑人功能障碍我们今天的负担很重。 55年来,福利国家奖惩不负责任的人。 这是非常不合群的。 你想要那个吗?

    多年来,我一直在这里和那里与非常负责任的黑人一起工作。 但是,它们不是问题。 在我们生活的这个无政府暴政下,许多年轻黑人的暴力和破坏才是问题所在。 你知道,但你不想成为“仇恨者”,所以我明白了。

    • 哈哈: Emslander
  26. @HallParvey
    @艾希迈德·纽曼(Achmed E.Newman)


    约翰福音 8 章 32 节说:“真理必使你自由”。
     
    约翰撒谎了。

    回复:@Achmed E. Newman

    他在谈论一个人的灵魂,而不是他在美国的地位 无政府主义暴政,帕维先生。

  27. @Baxter
    我的印象是,即使不是大多数,美国公民中的极少数(如果不是大多数)真的只是不想被这种乏味的生活所困扰。 左派是无情的,虽然绝不是统一的社会工程巨头。 如果左派退缩,不是承认他们的计划有误,也不是承认他们的前进方向有误,而是暂时让右派得到喘息的机会,这将被视为胜利的标志。 然后,当机智迟钝而人民安抚时,左派继续向他们所看到的任何光荣未来进军。 几十年来,这一直是左派的策略。 他们从不停止。
    右翼,尤其是反堕胎运动采用了左翼所使用的策略,并无情地推动了反堕胎议程。 推翻罗伊花了几十年的时间。 基于支持生命运动的成功,有可能激发足够多的人口来实现特定目标。 然而,正如现代美国人已经变得多样化、分裂和颓废,我不相信在理智层面上的另一场胜利是可能的,因为推翻罗伊是可能的。
    我只希望这不会变成一场代价高昂的胜利! 想象一下在蓝州激起的反应。

    Replies: @Emslander, @Veracity

    反堕胎者并没有建立政治多数派来取得胜利(尽管第四修正案是这样说的)。 凭借运气和作伪证的证词,他们推翻了最高法院。

  28. – 对评论四的一点回应思考,尽管尽我们所能当然很重要,就重要性而言,剩下的小商店不多,几乎没有一家生产销售的产品,大多数产品都是通过“分销商”和垄断来源,孟山都/bayer、cargil、企业集团或来自其他地区的限制运输。 商店里“看起来”有很多食品公司,但这是虚假的形象。 有很多人参与了虚假的外表计划。 另一个因素是人口比我们被告知的要多,关键是当人们让群众进入时,抵制意味着更少,移民交出的免费资金继续帮助垄断目标。 因此,尽管选择较小的、重要的重点是共享信息,但要与人们让进来的移民保持联系。大多数人都坐着,所以每个人都应该让移民成为盟友,如果不是,无知有助于奴隶制计划。 例如分享信息,如果更多的人对vaxs说不可以有所作为,或者分享对限制食物危险的认识,鼓励在院子里种植食物等。

    否则,在公司的主题和金钱的焦点上,它实际上是关于控制,而不是金钱。 假设“钱”只是为了让利弊可以从无到有,组成政府,军事/武器,食物和水控制。 那么他们就不需要钱了。 现实生活和未来的决心意味着制造和加入部落,不要让任何人或团体获得比你拥有的更多的武器,以及水、食物、共享信息、扩大部落权力,按照这个顺序,而不是金钱。 在任何情况下,都可以做一些事情来努力,至关重要的是不要被无关紧要的事情的利弊分心,妨碍收回能力和未来。 建议记下清单,有助于重点优先。 大多数人都没有被教导优先考虑什么是重要的,或者现实生活是什么,或者应该是什么。

  29. @mark green
    Fiery rebuke to the totalitarian Left. Well said! It's also important to remember that most corporations follow political trends. For them, it's all about profitability. Nothing more. These are publicly-traded companies, after all. They are accountable to their shareholders. And shareholder value comes first.

    Most corporate entities are therefore concerned with mundane matter such as increasing profitability, boosting product innovation, cutting costs, improving customer relations, and capturing market share. That's it. Only a handful of major businesses (legacy media, entertainment, and social media) are deeply involved in political issues, news analysis, headline construction, news censorship, and disseminating propaganda. It's these top level manipulators/curators of public perception which deserve our utmost attention. And sometimes contempt.

    Corporations differ. Hugely. There's an enormous difference 在文化影响 例如,在通用汽车和 Facebook 或谷歌等公司之间。 这个事实必须考虑。

    Replies: @Achmed E. Newman, @Sir Launcelot Canning, @HallParvey, @Wilson Z.

    I fully agree about corporate profit motivated by greed. But a “totalitarian Left”? Really? Is this re-birth of Uncle Joe Stalin? Give me a break!

    • 回复: @Achmed E. Newman
    @Wilson Z.


    But a “totalitarian Left”? Really?
     
    Yes, really. That's all the left knows, Totalitarianism. There's no way their stupid ideas fly in a free society.

    "No break for you!"

  30. @Emslander
    @ruralguy

    劳驾?

    I'm a 75-year-old white Germanic Hitler sympathizer with five grown children and 13 grandchildren. I doubt that this knowledge will change your song and dance very much because your ability to grasp social reality is obviously depraved, but there you go.

    回复:@但是谦虚的工匠

    these people have lost their bearing at least 80 years ago.

    One would say nevermind but for the havoc they are wreaking.

  31. @Wilson Z.
    @马克绿色

    I fully agree about corporate profit motivated by greed. But a “totalitarian Left”? Really? Is this re-birth of Uncle Joe Stalin? Give me a break!

    回复:@Achmed E. Newman

    But a “totalitarian Left”? Really?

    Yes, really. That’s all the left knows, Totalitarianism. There’s no way their stupid ideas fly in a free society.

    “No break for you!”

  32. Great job, Michelle. And it is virtually ALL of corporate America engaging in this shameful behavior. Which is why it is probably not too effective to simply say “From now on I’m boycotting XYZ company because of their liberal BS and virtue-signaling.” At this point you would have to be boycotting almost every company/corporation in America and not buying goods or services from any of them. Probably not viable.

    The culture vultures have been winning for quite some time. All the important entities are aligned against us normies. Government, higher education, corporate America, and the mass media.
    America is dying, and I don’t feel so good myself.

  33. At this point you would have to be boycotting almost every company/corporation in America and not buying goods or services from any of them.

    That’s nearly true. It just leads us to think more about heading in that direction – “off the grid”, so to speak. Let’s support each other as much as possible, with little fanfare about it.

    Regarding your last sentence. I hope you will get better, Mr. Slim. The more you do, and the more we do, the better chances this country recovers from its terrible malady resembling its former self.

    Great comment though! Thank you.

    • 谢谢: Automatic Slim

评论被关闭。

通过RSS订阅所有Michelle Malkin的评论