Unz评论•另类媒体选择
美国主流媒体大都排除了有趣,重要和有争议的观点
 玩笑iSteve博客
这需要多长时间?
通过电子邮件将此页面发送给其他人

 记住我的信息



=>

书签 全部切换变革理论添加到图书馆从图书馆中删除 • B显示评论下一个新评论下一个新回复了解更多
回复同意/不同意/等等 更多... 这个评论者 这个线程 隐藏线程 显示所有评论
同意不同意谢谢LOL轮唱
这些按钮可将您的公开协议,异议,感谢,LOL或巨魔与所选注释一起注册。 仅对最近使用“记住我的信息”复选框保存姓名和电子邮件的频繁评论者可用,并且在任何八个小时的时间内也只能使用三次。
忽略评论者 关注评论者
搜寻文字 区分大小写  确切的词  包括评论
列表 书签

There’s a consensus among all responsible opinion-molders that a leading solution to today’s unemployment, low wages, growing inequality, and the like is to Fix the Schools. For example, this headline appeared recently in World Net Daily: “Zuckerman: Improve Education to Create US Jobs.” I’m sure that Zuckerberg would say the same thing in public, as would Obama, Romney, Friedman, Gingrich, Duncan, Gates, and, for that matter, Jobs if he were revivified. 
In contrast, immigration restriction is derided, on the rare occasions when it is even considered as a policy response to high unemployment and low wages, as taking too long to deal with the current crisis.

But, how long would Improved Education take to Create US Jobs? Say the average worker is 40 years old.  Furthermore, as we hear from all responsible commenters on The Gap in school achievement, the problem is that The Gap exists from the first point it is measured — in kindergarten — so therefore Fixing the Schools must include taking children likely to suffer low achievement away from their mothers or grandmothers for most of their waking hours and put them in intensive (and presumably Fixed) preschools by age 3 or so. (Or perhaps age 2 or 1 or zero or in utero … the age when intervention is determined to be necessary seems to creep backwards over time.) 

So, if we could Fix the Schools tomorrow, we’d have Fixed 40 year old workers within about 37 years, or by 2048. Too bad about people who will be 41 in 2048, of course. They will remain doomed. So, Fixed Schools will take about 62 years in toto to work their magic on the entire labor force. So, you can see why all sensible thinkers agree that Fixing the Schools makes much more sense than Enforcing the Border. Of course, nobody yet quite knows how to Fix the Schools, but no doubt that breakthrough will come Real Soon Now.



(从重新发布 史蒂夫 经作者或代表的许可)
 
•标签: 教育 
隐藏25条评论发表评论
忽略评论者...跟随仅认可
修剪评论?
  1. 公立学校不需要“固定”,而是解散。 把钱还给纳税人; 并废除逃学法。 让父母用他们退回的税款来教育他们认为合适的孩子。 参见 John Taylor Gatto 的网站(Google it)。在可恶的 Horace Mann 于 1850 年代开始将普鲁士模式强加给我们之前,美国人更聪明、更独立。

  2. 美国 SWPL 人群甚至没有考虑到美国学生日益糟糕的学校表现与涌入边境的墨西哥人数量直接相关。我的美国 SWPL 朋友和联系人仍然继续指责学校,不知道他们实际收到了多少资金,也不知道白人/亚洲人相对于世界其他地区的考试成绩和学业表现。当我与很多左派和右派人士谈论智商时,我一直注意到的一件事是,他们甚至不知道不同种族群体之间基本的智商测试分数差距,更不用说这些差距甚至或可能意味着什么。我经常发现,试图让很多人相信美国黑人和白人之间 15 分的智商差距本身就是一项几乎不可能完成的任务。

    这就是为什么我们在没有桨的情况下在狗屎溪上。

  3. "Zuckerman: Improve Education to Create US Jobs."

    I can't remember the last time I heard such an original and inspiring thought. Oh wait, yes I can: it was 'Hope and Change'.

  4. 我只是希望他们能告诉我们“明天有免费啤酒”。

    这两种情况都不太可能发生,免费啤酒会更令人欣慰。

  5. Omitted from World Net Daily's gloss is Mort's second prescription, found in his original US News article 此处.

    "2. Visas. Approve many more H-1B visas to permit highly educated graduate students in the hard sciences to work in engineering and technology. Contrary to popular perception of immigrants, these are people who would create more jobs rather than cost jobs."

    Like a broken record these guys are!

  6. Sure, fix the schools. Then we can be like Tunisia where most everyone has a college degree and nobody has a job.

    The problems we have with the economy, which mostly relate to the size and scope of the government, will not be solved by fixing the schools. I'd rather have a prosperous country full of employed people who have a tenuous grasp of algebra than a country full of math whizzes who sell trinkets to foreign tourists.

  7. 埃里克 说

    >Tunisia where most everyone has a college degree and nobody has a job<

    固定:

    America 2014 where most everyone has a college degree and nobody has a job.

    In Mort's world, the community college, like McDonalds, will always be hiring professors of Media, Excel, Real Estate, Transgender Studies, and How To Make Jewelry. At about the same pay as a McDonalds job.

  8. 大卫:

    I think low-skill immigration and high-skill immigration really are somewhat different issues. At the extreme high end, we surely want to let in, say, world class scientists who want to come to America. We may also want to let in doctors and engineers, though there are downsides there–we may push most Americans out of those fields by pushing the return on an expensive and demanding education down too low.

    But those concerns seem fundamentally different from the ones surrounding large scale immigration of low-skill people whose kids and grandkids don't seem to do all that well in school. Importing Indian doctors and engineers may lead to some bad outcomes, but one of them probably wont be to import a big permanent underclass.

  9. The deliberate devaluing and destruction of vocational ed is the great unmentioned issue in education. I just spent the last school year watching a principal, a superintendent, a school board, and county commissioners lambast my school for being a vo-tech. Of all the awful shit that I've experienced in my years teaching-the gangs, the infantile parents, the pervs, the ridiculous SPED laws, the political correctness-this takes the cake.

  10. Steve, the point about "fix the schools" is really "spend money to employ people like us." Generally nice White ladies and such (yes including men).

    That's the whole point — employ more SWPL.

  11. “威士忌说...

    Steve, the point about "fix the schools" is really "spend money to employ people like us." Generally nice White ladies and such (yes including men)."

    Yes, Whiskey, Steve knows this. We all know this. We are not as stupid as we think you are.

  12. At the extreme high end, we surely want to let in, say, world class scientists who want to come to America. –NOTA

    It was just as easy for those to get in under the Harding and Coolidge laws as under the Johnson laws.

    Ever heard of Wernher von Braun? Albert Einstein? An Wang? Andy Grove?

  13. The argument about 'fixing the schools' is pure crap – and any intelligent person should quickly see right through it.
    The driver of all economic growth and therefore higher living standards and employment is technoligal innovation ie new inventions, industrila processes and ways of doing things.
    Now in today's hi-tech world, technological innovation is not the fruit of the lone 'practical man' genius anymore, but the fruit of engineering and science PhDs working in company research labs and doing esearch projects.Think of William Shockley, Xerox labs, IBM labs etc.
    As we all know only a small fraction of the general population has IQs high enough to do this work, and in general these people come from good middle class families, are recognised and do well is school as it is.
    Casting the net wider amongst the 'great unwashed' just won't work.Diminishing returns and all that – the crucial high IQ material just doesn't live there.
    a better way of nuturing crucial talent is to offer full scholarships to talented science and math students and to hothouse high IQ students from the earliest years.

  14. The entire "broken schools" meme is the combined effort of the teachers' unions and the cheap labor lobby.

    It benefits the teachers' unions because it results in an endless supply of new money to fix a problem that cannot be repaired.

    It benefits the cheap labor because it implies Americans are stupid and uneducated workers who need to be replaced with intelligent, well-educated (and of course, cheaper) foreigners.

    As with so many issues, on "broken schools", the so-called left and right split the truth right down the middle.

  15. US Business has been carping about how "bad" schools are for the past 30 years. Interestingly, that is about the same time US Business stopped training its workers and started treating them like disposable machine parts instead of valuable assets.

    I've been involved in education and workforce development fields since the early 80's. During that time, I have watched "free market capitalists" continually try to shift the burden of training their workers onto the government.

  16. 注意
    Replacing Americans with dumb people, on the one hand, and replacing Americans with non-dumb people, on the other, is still replacing Americans. You fellows are hell-bent on "electing a new people," as Brecht put it. I find your patriotism nonexistent.

    From a tactical point of view, welcoming easily outwitted invaders may be better than welcoming smart invaders. China, for example, should have to fire shots if it wants to invade us.

    (I won't mention the fact, because it's of less importance, that right-half-of-the-Bell-Curvers are inextricably bound up with larger numbers of left-halfers [relatives, friends of relatives, relatives of these friends, their relatives, etc.]. Not everyone whom the craftier immigrant would bring into the US is as bright as he.)

  17. One highly effective way to improve our educational system would be to stop Hispanics with low IQs from entering the United States.

  18. "Americans were smarter, and more independent, before the Prussian model was imposed on us beginning in the 1850s by the odious Horace Mann."

    Yes, but something else also started happening to the US right before the 1850s. (Hint it starts with "Ir" and ends with "ish")

    Unruly Irish kids (who in those days often didn't speak English) is one of the reasons Mann was able to get traction with his public school system in the first place. I'm not kidding:

    " Struck by the large number of Irish immigrant children living in squatters’ camps beside the railroad lines on which their fathers worked, [Mann} pushed for mandatory education laws that would require towns and districts to provide schooling for all children, whether permanent residents or not."

    http://www.ait.net/technos/tq_09/2eakin.php

    So the roots of our public school system have been entwined with mass immigration since the beginning. An unholy alliance that goes back more than 150 years.

  19. The people who talk this way about schools are like Chelsea Clinton in her TV debut. They aren't trying to solve problems or give you information. They are trying to ennoble themselves.

    "Stories from the Chelsea beat, meanwhile, are all meant to do a few things, very quickly: Highlight some bright spot of good news in otherwise bleak circumstances; indicate how viewers might help out the situation, if so inclined; and (this is never once said, but almost always palpable in the empathetic eyes of the reporter) ennoble the reporter herself, and thereby ennoble the network."

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/chelsea-clinton-makes-broadcast-debut-on-nbcs-rock-center/2011/12/12/gIQApql2qO_story.html?hpid=z5

  20. elvisd said,

    "The deliberate devaluing and destruction of vocational ed is the great unmentioned issue in education. I just spent the last school year watching a principal, a superintendent, a school board, and county commissioners lambast my school for being a vo-tech. Of all the awful shit that I've experienced in my years teaching-the gangs, the infantile parents, the pervs, the ridiculous SPED laws, the political correctness-this takes the cake."

    Ditto–happened where I taught too. They all think they have to have every kid take first year algebra, geometry, second year algebra when a lot of kids will NEVER have either the ability nor the interest in any of those.

    Carpentry? Metal shop? The boards don't want to spend money on those things.

  21. 大规模驱逐非法移民将对为公民创造更多就业机会产生立竿见影的效果,特别是在美国。黑色的。

  22. 保罗·门德斯: I've been involved in education and workforce development fields since the early 80's. During that time, I have watched "free market capitalists" continually try to shift the burden of training their workers onto the government.

    Concurrently with trying to shift the burden of actually paying them onto the "government" aka net taxpayers. (Food stamps, medical care, education, housing subsidies, etc., etc., etc.)

  23. "Carpentry? Metal shop? The boards don't want to spend money on those things."

    Ah, hell no, prole whites are good at that stuff and can earn a good living doing that. Therefore, the school system wastes their time during high school and makes them take out loans to get trained after high school.

  24. "As we all know only a small fraction of the general population has IQs high enough to do this work, and in general these people come from good middle class families, are recognised and do well is school as it is.
    "Casting the net wider amongst the 'great unwashed' just won't work.Diminishing returns and all that – the crucial high IQ material just doesn't live there.
    a better way of nuturing crucial talent is to offer full scholarships to talented science and math students and to hothouse high IQ students from the earliest years."

    See, Anon, what you don't realize is the elites KNOW all this.

    They are "casting the net wider" because they DON'T want brainiacs from the middle class getting full scholarships —

    because they don't WANT any actual competition to arise that would knock their own (reverted-to-the-mean) spawn out of the plum positions in society.

评论被关闭。

通过RSS订阅所有Steve Sailer评论