Unz评论•另类媒体选择$
美国主流媒体大都排除了有趣,重要和有争议的观点
 博客浏览约瑟夫·索伯伦(Joseph Sobran)档案
编者按
通过电子邮件将此页面发送给其他人

 记住我的信息



=>

书签 全部切换总目录添加到图书馆从图书馆中删除 • B
显示评论下一个新评论下一个新回复了解更多
回复同意/不同意/等等 更多... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
同意不同意谢谢LOL轮唱
这些按钮可将您的公开协议,异议,感谢,LOL或巨魔与所选注释一起注册。 仅对最近使用“记住我的信息”复选框保存姓名和电子邮件的频繁评论者可用,并且在任何八个小时的时间内也只能使用三次。
忽略评论者 关注评论者
搜寻文字 区分大小写  确切的词  包括评论
列表 书签

In the January 1998 issue, of S OBRAN’S I announced what I believe is an extremely important discovery: a previously neglected work by the man who was Shakespeare. Moreover, it tends strongly to confirm that he was actually, as I tirelessly contend, Edward de Vere, Earl of Oxford.

I think the evidence, even in a short summary, speaks for itself. The 40 sonnets of 埃马里杜夫 bristle with Shakespearean phrases. Whoever wrote the Shakespeare plays wrote these sonnets. And it could hardly have been the man from Stratford.

The title page and dedication identify the author of the poems only as “E.C., Esquire,” and the very little that has been written about them says only that E.C. has never been identified. Well, he has now. Even the dedication has echoes of the dedications of 金星和阿多尼斯The Rape of Lucrece.

It all sounds implausible, I know; even after I had found seemingly definitive proof, I kept asking myself whether I’d made some huge mistake. Sometimes it seemed like a dream I might be about to awake from. And yet every time I checked again, there it was.

我发现 埃马里杜夫 nearly a year ago; until now I’ve kept it to myself to make sure I’d considered every angle. The same questions that must be occurring to you, dear reader, occurred to me.

Chiefly, of course, I wondered how all the scholars could have missed these poems, which have existed for more than four centuries and were published in 1595. I’ve learned not to put too much faith in the experts in any field, but I thought Elizabethan literature had been pretty thoroughly covered. Surely some doctoral candidate had pored over this work and noticed the abundance of Shakespearean touches and verbal parallels! Apparently not.

On reflection, it doesn’t seem so strange. Most scholars nowadays are like bureaucrats; they stay within the system, and they hardly notice anything outside it. The literary scholars believe that the name “William Shakespeare” means the son of Stratford, so it isn’t surprising that they should take “E.C., Esquire” at face value too. It’s really no more amazing than that lawyers, legal scholars, and Supreme Court justices have forgotten the plain meaning of the U.S. Constitution. You can overlook just about anything if you aren’t looking for it. (I regret to say I’ve also proved this myself, many times over. Several times just today, in fact.)

I’m still trying to piece the story together. Of Oxford we know that he had a towering literary reputation in his own day — Edmund Spenser was one of many who praised him lavishly — and also that he thought it was vulgar for a gentleman to publish his work under his own name. My guess is that 埃马里杜夫 was written many years before it saw print and had been privately circulated; it may have been among the poems Francis Meres had in mind in 1598 when he said that “Shakespeare” had passed his “sugared sonnets among his private friends.”

At some point in the future I’ll discuss other poems I have reason to believe Oxford wrote before he became “Shakespeare,” An incredible story is just beginning to unfold.

(从重新发布 索伯兰的 经作者或代表的许可)
 
当前评论者
说:

发表评论-对超过两周的文章发表评论,将在质量和语气上进行更严格的判断


 记得 我的信息为什么?
 电子邮件回复我的评论
$
提交的评论已被许可给 Unz评论 并可以由后者自行决定在其他地方重新发布
在翻译模式下禁用评论
通过RSS订阅此评论主题 通过RSS订阅所有约瑟夫·索伯伦评论