Unz评论•另类媒体选择$
美国主流媒体大都排除了有趣,重要和有争议的观点
 博客浏览菲利普·吉拉迪(Philip Giraldi)档案
以色列的国际阴谋
几乎每个西方国家都有一个以色列游说团
通过电子邮件将此页面发送给其他人

 记住我的信息



=>

书签 全部切换总目录添加到图书馆从图书馆中删除 • B
显示评论下一个新评论下一个新回复了解更多
回复同意/不同意/等等 更多... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
同意不同意谢谢LOL轮唱
这些按钮可将您的公开协议,异议,感谢,LOL或巨魔与所选注释一起注册。 仅对最近使用“记住我的信息”复选框保存姓名和电子邮件的频繁评论者可用,并且在任何八个小时的时间内也只能使用三次。
忽略评论者 关注评论者
搜寻文字 区分大小写  确切的词  包括评论
列表 书签

Swedish Foreign Minister Margot Wallstrom recently suggested an inquiry into a surge in Israel’s reported extra-judicial killing of Palestinian demonstrators after Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called for a harsh response and told his police and soldiers that those opposed to the continued occupation of the West Bank were “terrorists.” Almost immediately, the Israeli government denounced Wallstrom as engaging in “political stupidity,” banning her from travel to Israel, while one newspaper close to the government 建议 that she might be assassinated, as fellow Swede Count Folke Bernadotte was by Jewish militants in 1948, because anti-Semitism appears to be in the Swedish DNA.

All of that outrage and personal ridicule is pro forma for an Israeli government that reflexively smears and denigrates any and all critics, but the more interesting epilogue was the unanticipated discovery by the Swedish and international media that Wallstrom has not been paying the full rent on the subsidized government apartment that she occupies. The revelation follows a familiar pattern, where critics of Israel suddenly find themselves being discredited for something completely unrelated to the Middle East. President George H. W. Bush (the good Bush) suffered a similar come to Jesus moment in 1991 when he went on national television to denounce the pressure tactics of the Israel lobby. The Israeli government was demanding U.S. Treasury backed loans to construct illegal settlements. President Bush, who was running for reelection and far ahead in the opinion polls, suddenly was confronted by a well-funded and organized opposition raising doubts about him and his record. And President Bush was not reelected, presumably learning along the way that one does not trifle with the Israel Lobby, to be replaced by the enthusiastically Zionist Bill Clinton.

United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon is also wondering about Israel’s alleged commitment to peace. On Tuesday he said “it was human nature to react to occupation,” following up with a comment on Wednesday regarding Israel’s “stifling” occupation of Palestine. Netanyahu reacted with his usual over the top rhetoric, stating that Ban “was encouraging terror.” One might also anticipate, as in the case of Wallstrom, a well-orchestrated 媒体闪电战 questioning Ban’s motives or explaining how he has always been a closet anti-Semite. It is par for the course and fully expected when one criticizes Israel.

事实上,这是一个全球现象。 无论走到哪里——西欧、加拿大、澳大利亚、新西兰和美国——都有一个组织良好、资金充足的游说团体准备好、愿意并且能够开战以保护以色列。 大多数参与的组织至少从特拉维夫的官员那里得到一些指导。 他们中的许多人甚至与以色列政府、其半国营组织和法律中心 Shurat HaDin 等虚假非政府组织充分合作。 他们的目标是传播宣传并影响其各自居住国的公众,要么坚持从特拉维夫出来的路线,要么在讨论以色列的潜在罪行时混淆叙述并扼杀辩论。

以色列的侨民盟友得到了一个强大的政府组织机器的支持,每当批评者浮出水面时,该机器就会喷出虚假信息并搅浑水。 以色列外交部有一支受薪部队 “志愿者” who monitor websites worldwide and take remedial action and there is a similar group working out of the Prime Minister’s office. That is why any negative story appearing in the U.S. about Israel is immediately inundated with pro-Israel comments, many of which make exactly the same coordinated points while exhibiting the same somewhat less than perfect English. On sites like Yahoo they are actually able to suppress unwelcome comments by flooding the site with “Dislike” responses. If a comment receives a large number of dislikes, it is automatically blocked or removed.

新的 赛义南, local Jews in their countries of residence, are essential to this process, having been alerted by emails from the Israeli Foreign Ministry about what to do and say. The reality is that Israel has lost the war of public opinion based on its own actions, which are becoming more and more repressive and even inhumane and so are difficult to explain. That means that the narrative has to be shifted by Israel’s friends through subterfuge and the corruption of the information process in each country. In some places the key media and political players who are engaged in the process can simply be bought. In other places they can be intimidated or pressured into taking positions that are neither in their own countries’ interests nor morally acceptable. In large countries like the United States, Britain and France a combination of friendly suasion and coercive elements often come together.

在所有情况下,目标都是相同的:压制或歪曲对以色列的任何批评,并阻止可能会损害以色列经济或该国在世界上的地位的任何举措。 在一些国家,以色列的拥护者在公开场合开展工作,并在实施政策方面取得了巨大成功,这些政策往往在很大程度上是隐藏的,但只要人们知道要寻找什么,就可以看出这一点。

Recent Israel Lobby activity in the United States has included legislation at state levels to make illegal divestment from Israel or to promote boycott of Israeli products. A trade pact with Europe will reportedly include language requiring the United States to take retaliatory action if any European country tries to boycott Israel, to include the West Bank settlements, which the empowering legislation regards as part of Israel proper.

Israel is also working to create a mechanism for global censorship of the internet to ban “incitement,” which clearly is a euphemism for material that is critical of its policies. Recently Facebook has begun to delete from its site any “hate speech” and “terrorism” related material but what has not been widely noted is that the apparent restrictions also have involved sites 批评以色列 如: Christians United for Peace.

Many prominent critics of the American Israel Political Action Committee (AIPAC) are unaware that AIPAC exists in various forms in a number of other countries. 百康 , the Britain Israel Communications and Research Centre, is located in London. The French equivalent is the Conseil Representatif des Institutions Juives de France (CRIF). In Canada there is a Center for Israel and Jewish Affairs (CIJA) , in Australia a Zionist Federation of Australia and in New Zealand a Zionist Federation of New Zealand .

While AIPAC is specifically focused on the U.S.-Israel relationship, its counterparts in Europe often deal with a whole range of issues that they define as Jewish, but protecting Israel is always part of their agenda, particularly for those groups that label themselves as Zionist. The political power and financial muscle of the groups gives them access to government far beyond the actual numbers of their supporters. In France this has led to the legislation of hate crimes that 事实上的 存在 to protect Jews that have been also been interpreted as limitations on one’s ability to criticize Israel. In its most recent test, a French court 宣称 a peaceful protest promoting Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) directed against Israel was illegal.

Many believe that France now has less free speech than any other European country. Recently, the alleged humor magazine 查理周刊,跑了 a revolting cartoon showing the little Syrian boy Alan Kurdi who drowned in Turkey last summer as all grown up and sexually assaulting a woman in Germany. There was considerable outrage throughout the world but no sign that the French government will do anything to prosecute the magazines since it was Muslims who were being ridiculed. Charlie Hebdo frequently insults Muslims (and also Christians) but rarely lampoons Jews.

In Britain, Jewish organizations uniquely are 允许巡逻 heavily Jewish neighborhoods in police-like uniforms while driving police type vehicles and there have been reports of their threatening Muslims who enter the areas. Prime Minister David Cameron’s government, which is responsive to a Conservative Friends of Israel lobbying group, has also done its part to create official barriers to any spread of the BDS movement. It is proposing legislation that will enable it to overrule decisions by local government councils that seek to cut business or investment ties with Israel and, more particularly, Israeli settlements, under the pretext that such action interferes with the conduct of foreign affairs. The British government is also considering its own brand of hate speech legislation, banning from social media any commentary that is considered to be anti-Semitic, which will almost certainly extend to criticism of Israel.

Canada’s government has also threatened to use hate speech laws to block criticism of Israel and forbid BDS related activity. Australia meanwhile, has ceased referring to east Jerusalem as “occupied” and is apparently leaning towards similar “non-pejorative” language relating to the militarized occupation of the West Bank, preferring the neocon favored dodge “disputed.” New Zealand 已经提出 Israeli-Palestinian peace talks that specifically demands that participants “refrain from referring a situation…to the International Criminal Court,” which would effectively decriminalize war crimes committed by both sides during the two recent invasions of Gaza. As a United Nations investigation determined that Israel was disproportionately responsible for what did occur, the proposal eliminates accountability and is effectively a get out of jail free card for some Israeli government officials.

And so it goes. Criticize Israel and there will be a comeuppance by virtue of a highly developed international system that relies on government direction as well as volunteer supporters who are able to shape both the media message and the political response. Accepting that as a given, I suppose one should be proud of being called an anti-Semite every time the label is misapplied to stifle dissent, but it all sadly reflects a lowering of the discussion to a dirt level. This might just be because there is no justification for Israeli behavior. The fact is that in terms of systematic human rights violations Israel is something beyond an apartheid state, frequently engaging in open racism and, in the opinion of many observers, crimes against humanity. It is furthermore a persistent source of instability in the Middle East and even beyond.

Israel is a liability to the United States and to the European nations that it has successfully manipulated into acquiescence regarding its bad behavior. When AIPAC and its overseas clones act for Israel the host nations in which these organizations exist should recognize exactly what is taking place. If Israel is truly first in their hearts and minds that is perfectly acceptable but its advocates should perhaps consider moving there and letting the rest of us be. Would that be too much to ask?

 
• 类别: 对外政策 •标签: AIPAC, 百康, 佳佳, 到岸价, 以色列大堂 
隐藏294条评论发表评论
忽略评论者...跟随Endorsed Only
修剪评论?
    []
  1. marwan 说:

    and yet there are almost zero news articles about chinese occupation of tibet , turkish occupation of cyprus , indonesian occupation of papua , moroccan occupation of western sahara ……….

  2. Anonymous • 免责声明 说:

    Often when I read a piece of Phil’s, I get the vision of a brilliant architect dumping corbels, arches, window frames, doors, chimneys, cedar siding, brick walls on a large floor. These items are actually recent Zionist activities (polite term). I am familiar with many of these Zionist moves and international reactions to them, Phil’s building blocks. But every time, He surprises me. Every build, every article, is original. Same old Zionist trickery. Always new Giraldi interpretation.

  3. Maj. Kong 说:

    阿拉伯主义者的不切实际的旅程。

    http://www.gallup.com/poll/181652/seven-americans-continue-view-israel-favorably.aspx?g_source=COUNTRY_ISR&g_medium=topic&g_campaign=tiles

    伊斯兰主义者坐在以色列议会中,但任何对犹太复国主义的倡导都会导致伊朗入狱或更糟。

    承认自己是一个彻头彻尾的反犹太主义者,The Right Stuff 有很多朋友已经克服了心理冲击。

  4. alexander 说:

    尊敬的吉拉尔迪先生,

    I think,perhaps,what should NOT be too much to ask of Israel is..does it have a “Peace Plan” ?

    Shouldn’t any (and every) nation on this planet, in a state of belligerence, be required to present some form of resolution to its own conflict, that comports with international law ?

    If so…then where is Israels plan for peace ?

    What does it look like ?…what does it sound like ?

    它在哪里 ?

    Assume for a moment, Mr Giraldi, that you are at war with an enemy and that enemy has agreed to all the internationally mandated resolutions to the conflict…and you have not.

    How is it possible that your enemy (who has agreed to the worlds terms for peace), is the terrorist in the equation…and not you ?

    Israel has a done a tremendous job in selling to the world its “war on terror”, but absent a viable peace plan of its own (and a willingness to implement it)…..it may not be long before the label “terrorist” is, justifiably, turned on its own progenitor.

    • 回复: @joe webb
  5. LondonBob 说:

    I thought it would be hard for the Cameron government to be even more subservient to Israeli interests than the Blair government was, how wrong I was. At least the openly anti Israeli Corbyn was elected to leadership of the Labour party, perhaps astonishing in of itself. The barrage of negative media coverage and lack of money had no effect, although the undermining of Corbyn goes on so it is unlikely his leadership will be successful. The Lobby depends on its illusion of strength, once it loses that it is quickly diminished.

  6. Yes, it is a ‘conspiracy’. Yes, it is ‘international’. And yes, the perps are Jewish! Oy vey.

    Unfortunately, stating these near-obvious facts probably means you’re an ‘anti-Semite’, Mr. Giraldi. (And a virulent one at that!) Sorry, truth is no defense. Off to jail!

    Has the unhinged, delusional, war-happy American Empire gone all-kosher? It’s looking that way. Fortunately, you haven’t violated any ‘speech codes’ just yet (that we know of).

    唔。 最好小心点。

    In a just and rational world, insightful and verifiable observations of this kind you posit would be protected vigorously–if not lauded. But they’re not. Why? The censors are gaining ground. And their Zionist cheerleaders dominate the airwaves.

    But there is a covert, global movement afoot that’s designed to protect and empower the pan-Zionist project. It runs from Jerusalem to London to Paris to Frankfurt to Washington to NY to Chicago to LA to Ottawa to Sydney and beyond. It is vast, subversive and deviously effective. New values have emerged. Commandments. In the freedom-loving West, Thou Shalt Now Show ‘Contempt’ of Jewry’!–no matter what. And there’s more where that came from.

    But since everything you describe, Mr. Grialdi is basically spot on, all your detractors can do is 1) ignore you, 2) defame you, or 3) diminish you by labeling you an ‘extremist’ or ‘bigot’ or saying things like ‘[Giraldi] verges on crossing the line into anti-Semitism’–or some other such insult. It’s a familiar game plan. Death by a thousand cuts.

    Rumors/allegations of ‘anti-Semitism’, then, are a tactic of defamation that’s used to manage political discourse. The anti-Semitic boogeyman has enormous and enduring power. This is no accident. Rule-breakers will be punished. But the name-calling and politically-correct denunciations are a ruse. What the Zio-supremacists are trying to do is switch the subject away from Israel (and them) to the few critics who violate either unwritten rules or Hate Speech statutes. Off with their heads! (or simply see that they’re fired and ruined).

    Thus, the Chosen People have become a protected class. Question their status at your own peril. This unwritten rule is well-understood by our governing class. So when it comes to Israel, there shall be no ‘harsh criticism’ or anti-Zionist advocacy. Never. These taboos are managed and amplified by our dominant media.

    So the core problem remains. It is 1) Israel’s global footprint, 2) its (mostly) unrecognized power around the world, and 3) the rising array of restrictions around exploring this phenomena.

    这个故事的子文本是这样的:

    犹太教至上主义者仍在向政府施压,仍在贿赂候选人,仍在歪曲历史,仍在审查批评者,并仍在为自己的部落利益操纵舆论。 它们令人生畏的全球影响力破坏了每个东道国的主权和道德正直。

    这种模式非常真实,而且意义重大。

    然后是他们的战术问题。

    Denial, obfuscation, corruption, aggression, expulsion, denunciation, and sheer intimidation–by whatever means necessary. They can be ruthless.

    Fortunately, some of these Hebraic black arts are losing influence. This is due in part to the words and actions of good men who–like you, Mr. Giraldi–are leading the way.

    So thank you for exposing some of their dark machinations. Needless to say, it’s pretty much a thankless task. Ironically, it’s the AIPAC and the ADL that publicly hold lavish parties and awards ceremonies. Such crazy times these are.

    另一方面,我们这些只有一个国家的非犹太裔美国人被推到了边缘。

    你有说服力的分析表达了一种意识,这种意识正在许多人的脑海中慢慢升起。 犹太人至上主义是真实的。

    • 回复: @helena
    , @Corvinus
    , @Sasha
  7. Israel’s alleged commitment to peace?

    Israel wants a piece of Syria; a piece of Iraq; a piece of Saudi Arabia; a piece of Lebanon; a piece of Jordan; a piece of Turkey; a piece of Egypt and whatever pieces are left after they genocide Palestine out of existence.

    • 同意: Orville H. Larson
    • 回复: @annamaria
    , @Wizard of Oz
  8. Priss Factor [又名“多米尼克·弗兰肯学会”] 说: • 您的网站

    If Zionists can help it, Giraldi’s speech will be banned as ‘hate speech’.

    http://thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2013/02/27/1647321/canadian-supreme-court-upholds-hate-speech-laws-against-anti-gay-activist/

    I say fight fire with fire. We need to define ‘hate speech’ in our own way and call for banning it.

    Ban Zionist speech because it hates Palestinians.

    Ban feminist speech because it hates white males who did most to free women.

    Ban rap music because it savagely hates civilized virtues.

    Ban pro-illegal-immigration speech since it hates the rule of law.

    Ban homo speech since it hates normality and true marriage.

    Ban PC since it hates the truth.

    Ban communist speech since it hates private property and upper classes.

    Ban anti-fascist speech since it hates fascists.

    Ban interracist speech since it hates racial solidarity.

    等等

    • 回复: @Priss Factor
    , @Lawrence1978
  9. Excellent article. By the way, I found it through this blog: theshitlordhub.blogspot.com (Shitlord Hub) It aggregates RSS feeds from a plethora of Alt Right blogs and sites.

  10. Santoculto 说:

    Mentally disturbed people control the world. Tell me a news.

    Europeans were nurtured to be mind slaves, every side of political/ideological spectrum have a potential to become a “Jewish perspective”, even those that call themselves anti-juda-ism, as white nationalism.

    Christianism (basically, the cult to the certain biblical/jewish family supremacist story) contribute a lot to create a cultural “European” cycle: “capital-ism” or materialism as ideology of worker hope, ” the work make us free”, the “sanctity” of “hard working”, that owners simply love and christianism, the cult to the metaphysical hope, “never dies, never come”. Religious Europeans and diaspora pray to the Jewish god “who” help just the chosen ones.

    European pray waiting for a better future while Ashkenazi armenoid Jews manipulate this clear weakness to their own and their kids.

  11. Priss Factor [又名“多米尼克·弗兰肯学会”] 说: • 您的网站
    @Priss Factor

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Covenant_on_Civil_and_Political_Rights

    “Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.”

    In that case, all the Third World Liberation struggles were wrong since they incited hatred for the imperialists. Cubans incited hatred against imperialist America. Viet Cong incited hatred against imperialist America. Algerians incited hatred against the imperialist French. Russians incited hatred for the German invaders.

    It is good to hate the oppressors and invaders.

    Whites need to hate invaders and oppressors of whites.

  12. Anonymous • 免责声明 说:

    ”Canada’s government has also threatened to use hate speech laws to block criticism of Israel and forbid BDS related activity.” That’s not hate speech when you denounce Mr Trudeau and his friend, Irwin Cotler who gave the OK for the No Fly Zone in Libya, and who (and the state owned media CBC-Radio-Canada) are still denying the consequences of the ”humanitarian” intervention” of Canada (and allies) in Libya.

    So they now want to use Canada for humanitarian intervention in Syria, and for FTAs concluded with the European Union? While remaining totally silent on Libya?

    • 回复: @Rehmat
  13. It is incredible what such a small group of determined maniacs can accomplish with the cowardly and clueless mass of sheep. But one of their fatal flaws is that they never know when to quit. Their continued push for more power and control will be their undoing, once again.

  14. “President George H. W. Bush (the good Bush)”

    Pinochet overthrow, 1980 October Surprise, Iran-Contra and Doug Coe associate which is likely related to the suppressed Discovery Channel documentary “Conspiracy of Silence” where tours of the White House were given to minors prior to rapes by political figures with (obvious and clear) ties to power at the pinnacle.

    That’s likely the tip of the iceberg. It never ceases to amaze how perception of George H.W. Bush is rehabilitated for the fact of crimes by his ignorant spawn.

    • 回复: @Not That Steve
  15. of course it is too much to ask. we are the meat shield and the club. why would they stop using us?

    hillary even held a press conference out of no where just to point out the rise of anti semitism in the world just to get the permission and backing to run for president from her jewish overlords.

    that is how much control they have over our “suppose” elites who are suppose to be leading our govt and country.

  16. Every country has embassies, lobbies, business groups and partnerships and espionage going against the country of every other. Israel is nothing special in this department and the United States is the worst offender. Every country sucks like a leech off the United States and they pay a price in the attentions bestowed by our intelligence agencies and lobbies in Washington and abroad. Israel is good at buying our tech and weapons, but they hardly “need” us. And they pay cash. But by all means, let us focus on the pittance of 5 billion bestowed upon Israel.

    And let us also ignore the trillions the rest of the Middle East costs us. Ignore China’s hacking and tampering and theft of software and technologies and military challenges (fleas, but still) and ignore the South Koreans and what they cost and ignore all the rest that dwarfs Israel. That’s what you have to do to buy into the premise presented by this article. Jesus, what an anti Semitic hit piece, no offense intended.

    • 回复: @ISmellBagels
    , @dahoit
  17. Recently I read a column by Paul Krugman in which he stated that there were two propositions that underlie every model he and other economists use to predict economic trends and prescribe policy. They were: that each person acts as an individual to maximize his gain and that he does so rationally. These are, by the way, the same propositions that are used by Game Theorists such as von Neumann. Each player is presumed to act rationally to advance their own self interest.

    One of the comments Alan Greenspan made in the wake of the bank collapse in 2008 was that he was surprised that the banks weren’t intelligent enough to have perceived the risk inherent in say, 200 : 1 leveraging (Lehmann) and would have realized that such actions would threaten the integrity of the system and that they, the banks, therefore would have refrained from such ultimately self defeating behavior.

    So, these Jewish geniuses expect us to believe that persons acting selfishly will be capable of perceiving when their individual behavior may threaten the very existence of the system in which they operate and because it is ultimately “rational” to do so would therefore refrain from acting selfishly–all out of selfish motives? Am I the only one who finds this preposterously ludicrous? Not to mention illogical? Perhaps psychopathic?

    There is a name for a person who at all times acts rationally to advance their personal gain and that is: sociopath. Another Jew, Ayn Rand, espouses this hyper, asocial psychopathy as a nostrum for all that ails society.

    Speaking personally, I act, almost always, to preserve group harmony and cohesion (but then, I am a Scandinavian by heritage). I am always aware of the tension between what I want and how this would strain group relations. I am aware that were any of us to pursue their goals without any considerations for other people’s way of thinking and feelings they would find themselves out of a job, alone and friendless and whats more, the system would not stand the strain were we all to pursue our private gain with no consideration for cooperation, compatibility and reconciliation. And obviously, since emotions play a role in my choices, I most certainly don’t always act rationally. In all of this, I don’t think that I am that different from other Western Europeans (or Japanese, Chinese etc.).

    Now Greenspan tries to pull off what Sailer would describe as a “triple bank shot” by saying that “Yes, but in considering your individual self interest you would take into account group cohesion because you are thereby enhancing your individual self interest and so you will restrain yourself from acting in such a way as to undermine blah blah blah…”. Horse puckey.

    No person–and especially not a Jew–is capable of simultaneously holding in mind and processing every variable on all these different levels as they work through the infinitude of permutations likely to result from any specific action.

    As usual, the Jews credit themselves with too much wisdom which leads one to suspect that their convoluted theories may be an elaborate cover to obfuscate the simple fact that they act to enhance their own self interest period–consequences be damned. Too bad if the rest of you get screwed in the process.

    Krugman, von Neumann and Greenspan are elder spokesmen for the perspective of the Jewish People and they have spoken so let’s do them the courtesy of taking them at their word. In their own words, their motives (which they then project onto the rest of the human race) are coldly-rational and self-interested always and all the time. One can see how this would put Jews in conflict with any society in which they find or found themselves.

    So now, the Jews, with Netanyahu as their spokesman want to enact policies which place Jews above criticism for policies in which Jews pursue what they perceive to be their uniquely individual, rational self interest.

    In light of the colossal failures, moral failings and intellectual inconsistencies listed above, is anyone else skeptical of Jew’s ability to even see what is truly in their (larger) self interest, much less come up with a viable plan and acting on it?

  18. Macilrae 说:

    Any self-respecting international conspiracy will, of course, deny its existence. Conducting operations in the light of day shows a very wrong set of ideas in a conspirator!

    A lot of emphasis is placed on the fact that the pressures placed on politicians are financial whereas many instances of policy reversal are so profound that personal blackmail seems a very credible alternative explanation. Obama (and Hillary’s) stunning reversal over the Jerusalem settlements issue is one striking example – or take the total capitulation of Justice Richard Goldstone following the publication of the UN report on the Gaza invasion of 2009.

    It is reasonable to suppose that AIPAC and its various international affiliates employ a formidable army of zealots, diligently sifting through everybody’s dirty linen.

    • 回复: @anonymous
  19. Sherman 说:

    Wow, with this all powerful Jewish – er, excuse me, Zionist – conspiracy that rules the world and the media and the Internet I don’t understand how Giraldi has the freedom to continually bash Israel the way he does.

    • 回复: @Jeff Davis
  20. @Priss Factor

    Hi, I’ve just checked your website (Alt Right Doodle & Search Engine). It’s really useful. I’ve linked to it on my own blog which is an aggregator for RSS feeds of Alt Right sites and blogs (it’s in the /Uncategorized Miscellany/ at the very bottom, on the right. Shitlord 枢纽

  21. That is why any negative story appearing in the U.S. about Israel is immediately inundated with pro-Israel comments, many of which make exactly the same coordinated points while exhibiting the same somewhat less than perfect English.

    Judging from the 19 comments posted at this moment … Q.E.D.

  22. @Jim Christian

    Let’s not ignore the trillions spent on wars for Israel. I smell bagels. You are either an idiot Christian zionazi or a zionazi hasbara lizard earning a few shekels.

    • 回复: @Jim Christian
  23. Rehmat 说:
    @Maj. Kong

    What’s the name Muslim MK? Are you referring to Rabbi Baruch Efrati who claims that Jews are allowed to pray in a mosque but not in a church?

    https://rehmat1.com/2012/01/28/rabbi-jews-can-pray-in-mosques/

  24. “If Israel is truly first in their hearts and minds that is perfectly acceptable but its advocates should perhaps consider moving there and letting the rest of us be.”

    You would have to dynamite these ticks out of their respective host nations. Jews are simply doing what Jews do: creating an intricate intelligence network that can be used to leverage influence for Jews worldwide, and Israel in particular. And they pursue this goal with a vehemence that is nothing short of demonic. They know that if they were ever forced to live in their own nation state, they would lose power and influence everywhere, because their intelligence apparatus would collapse. And that is what they will fight to the death to prevent.

  25. anonymous • 免责声明 说:
    @Threecranes

    brilliant comment.

    especially this;

    Speaking personally, I act, almost always, to preserve group harmony and cohesion (but then, I am a Scandinavian by heritage). I am always aware of the tension between what I want and how this would strain group relations. I am aware that were any of us to pursue their goals without any considerations for other people’s way of thinking and feelings they would find themselves out of a job, alone and friendless and whats more, the system would not stand the strain were we all to pursue our private gain with no consideration for cooperation, compatibility and reconciliation. And obviously, since emotions play a role in my choices, I most certainly don’t always act rationally. In all of this, I don’t think that I am that different from other Western Europeans (or Japanese, Chinese etc.).

    read somewhere just a few days ago that USA can and does act recklessly because it is so rich and powerful, whereas Russia must carefully weigh every move because it has far less ability to recover from errors.
    Israel, with its talons deep in the US arteries and Treasury, has even more freedom of movement: not only does it have access to the greatest and wealthiest power center on the globe, it does so without accountability to those who supply that power and wealth.

    One of the secrets to Jewish ability to gain wealth is leverage — they play with other people’s money, future, institutions, lands, etc., and if the enterprise fails, Jews walk away and someone else pays the bills, suffers the consequences, cleans up after them while they go on to leverage another poor sucker.

  26. Rehmat 说:

    Mr. Giraldi, not only powerful Jewish lobby groups exist in majority of western nations and Australia and New Zealand they have succeeded in turning those countries as Israeli satellites – thanks to local corrupt Christian law-makers.

    The Jewish vengeance against Wallstrom can be found in Ingrid Carlqvist‘s January 24 article published by Israeli think tank, Gatestone Institute, entitled, Sweden: The Downfall of Wallstrom?. She is a Swedish journalist, author, and “distinguished senior fellow” at the think tank.

    22月1948日,以色列教育部前任负责人兹维·扎梅雷特(Zvi Zameret)提出了一种将沃尔斯特罗姆女士拒之门外的方法。 在美国赌场亿万富翁谢尔登(Sheldon)拥有的Makor Rishon报纸上的一篇专栏文章中,他建议作出反以色列言论的Margot Wallstrom最近需要联合国调解员瑞典伯爵Folke Bernadotte的命运,该命运被前以色列总理伊扎克·沙米尔(Yitzhak Shamir)杀害23年的Lehi恐怖组织(蒙多威斯,2016年XNUMX月XNUMX日)。

    Israeli Mossad has a history of eliminating Swedish politicians who dared to criticize Israeli policies…..

    https://rehmat1.com/2016/01/25/swedish-fm-wallstrom-on-mossad-hit-list/

  27. And of course, the Chinese keep themselves utterly free and unentangled by this nonsense, allowing the shabbosgoy Western leadership to alienate the rest of the world and especially the Muslim and Arab countries, while China just waits for the strategic fruit to ripen and fall right into its lap.

    Amazing that the US had such an innate advantage vis-a-vis the Muslims, given our lack of restive Muslim minorities in contrast to Russia, China and India, and yet we have simply tossed away this huge strategic advantage because of the unrelenting and insidious connivance of disloyal international Jewry.

    One can’t help but envy China. Imagine a nation-state possessing cultural anti-bodies that give it virtual immunity from the pestilence of Jewish/Zionist influence. Is there any way they could bottle it and sell it?

  28. helena 说:
    @Mark Green

    Has there ever before been an empire in which the emperors did not wish to proclaim themselves to the masses? Oz?

  29. @ISmellBagels

    Your comment, ” I smell bagels. You are either an idiot Christian zionazi or a zionazi hasbara lizard earning a few shekels”, identifies you as a Palestinian goat herder that gets a chubby from his lambs. I guess facts don’t make it through to the streets your herd your Muslim-raped goats through.

    Gee, we haven’t spent trillions on wars for Israel. Our wars are concentrated on violent Islamist terror, however pointless they may be. Nonetheless, you Muslims are so confused about living in the First World you simply can’t handle it.

  30. @Jim Christian

    ” identifies you as a Palestinian goat herder that gets a chubby from his lambs. I guess facts don’t make it through to the streets your herd your Muslim-raped goats through.”

    Straight from Chapter One, page one of the Zionazi Handbook for Internet Hasbara Comments. Such lack of imagination. Oy vey.

  31. @Jim Christian

    And I ain’t Muslim, Moishe. Claiming only the people you zionazis are stealing from and killing detest you is another zionazi tactic. But you know better don’t you…

    • 回复: @Drapetomaniac
  32. @marwan

    That’s because there is no internal political pressure to legitimize those occupations as there is with Israel’s.

    • 回复: @RobinG
  33. joe webb 说:
    @alexander

    the zio peace plan: take the ME piece by piece

    乔·韦伯

  34. O wad some Pow’r the giftie gie us
    To see oursels as ithers see us!

    “The Men Who Taste Jews in Their Sandwiches.”

    http://takimag.com/article/the_men_who_taste_jews_in_their_sandwiches_jim_goad/print#ixzz3zgu804Wa

    • 回复: @RobinG
  35. RobinG 说:
    @Beefcake the Mighty

    It’s also because the US isn’t being suckered into immoral wars, expending blood and treasure,, to defend China’s occupation of Tibet, etc.

    • 同意: Seamus Padraig
  36. joe webb 说:
    @Threecranes

    good piece. I would only state that “rational” is insufficient when discussing just about anything.

    A Darwinian view suggests that since individuals act, first as members of a social/racial group, that such actions need to be consistent with group survival in the long term.

    That means some measure of respect and cooperation with other groups’ Darwinian interests in survival and prosperity, especially when one’s group is very small.

    The only reason the jews are still here is religion, which is not rational except as a group solidarity kind of dynamic.

    Protestantism long ago adopted jews as mascots for Jesus , strangely enough. Thus until that delusion among Protestants, especially the more rabid End-Timers wears out, Jews will always be with us.

    That said, jews continue to insult Others, even Christians, and while their prestige is sagging dramatically, there is little sign that they will be rational enough to awaken to their relatively dangerous position.

    Webb Principle # 4: mistakes are made by all, especially the angry ones.

    乔·韦伯

  37. annamaria 说:
    @marwan

    The above article is about the Zionists’ occupation of all major western nations. The Zionists’ occupation includes the suppression of free speech (when the truth is inconvenient for Israel), parasitic use of national resources of the US/EU for the benefits of Israel, and violation of international law for making Israelis/Zionists feel good. Now you are free to compare Zionists influence on the world politics with the influence of any other ethnic group.

    • 同意: Orville H. Larson
  38. annamaria 说:
    @Greg Bacon

    You forgot mentioning that the US has become a host for the parasitic ziocons.

  39. RobinG 说:
    @another fred

    Are you aiming the point of Goad’s article at Phil….or at his accuser-trolls?
    (Given your prior support for Israel, I’ve already made my guess.)

    • 回复: @another fred
  40. “Against the insidious wiles of foreign influence (I conjure you to believe me, fellow-citizens) the jealousy of a free people ought to be constantly awake, since history and experience prove that foreign influence is one of the most baneful foes of republican government.”

    The above is from Washington’s Farewell Address. Anybody remember him?

    • 同意: SolontoCroesus
    • 回复: @Threecranes
  41. Phil Giraldi’s excellent article (thanks again, Unz Review) is not only courageous but, to me, eye-opening. The facts on the global reach of Zionist intellectual intimidation have to frighten honest people, whether Gentile or Jew. But the Israel-Firsters had better be careful. Their machinations are rapidly removing the stigma from the epithet, “anti-Semite.”

  42. Clyde 说:

    Swedish Foreign Minister Margot Wallstrom recently suggested an inquiry into a surge in Israel’s reported extra-judicial killing of Palestinian demonstrators after Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called for a harsh response and told his police and soldiers that those opposed to the continued occupation of the West Bank were “terrorists.”

    The feminized Euro-cowards who rule Sweden should worry more about the Muslim immigration invasion they are submitting to and less about how Israel wrangles its Muslims. They should worry more about the ongoing rapes of lovely blond Swedish women by the Muslim invaders.
    Sweden has too many feminists and feminazis in high office and too many metro-sexual and gay men in high office. Meanwhile The Israeli Jews who have their balls intact show the way to keep Muslims at bay. TRANSLATION: You mess with the bull and you will get the horns.
    Through the centuries Islam has been the world’s most ruthless and most successful imperialism so I have zero sympathy for the Muslims trying to destroy Israel. They don’t want peace and justice with the Israeli Jews, they want Jihad and destruction of Israel.

    • 回复: @annamaria
  43. @Threecranes

    Thanks for your collectivist drivel.

    Your post is correct in that a mechanism exists – government – that is the legalized use of force against others. That is what is attracts the sociopaths with their drive to manipulate, control, and use others as objects. Self-interest backed by guns and no angels anywhere to be found who can resist it.

    You and your ilk are the enablers, government is the drug, and the sociopaths are the addicts. You play your part without even an iota of awareness.

    Look into the mirror if you want to see the root cause.

    • 回复: @Threecranes
  44. I feel no affiliation to Israel. But nor do I feel they’re creepily sinister or demonic. They’re simply looking after their own interests – which aren’t always the same as our interests. We’d do better to imitate them than forcefully oppose them.

    There are many SJW-type leftists and militant Muslims in the UK who think Israel is literally “the most evil country on the planet” ™. And it really, really isn’t. It’s not even the most evil country in the Middle East. The average Arab living in Israel proper (不能 the Occupied Territories) is probably better off than the average Arab in most of the Middle East. It’s far easier to be an out-of-the-closet gay Arab, or out-of-the-closet atheist Arab, in Israel than in Egypt.

    France and Sweden are discovering that you can either have a strong Jewish community or a strong Muslim community, but you can’t have both. After Oona King lost Bethnal Green and Bow in 2005, the UK Labour party has avoided putting up Jewish candidates in constituencies with large numbers of Muslims.

  45. @RobinG

    你读过它吗?

    The author has many questions about what he terms “The Jewish Question” (not original terminology, I know), and ends with:

    And this is the main reason why The Men Who Taste Jews in Their Sandwiches are such a pain in my tuchis. They live up to the crude stereotype of rabid, delusional anti-Semites, and by so doing, they tend to allow all criticism of Jews to be painted with the same broad Jew Brush. They’re the ones who tend to give so-called “anti-Semites” a bad name. It almost makes me suspect that some of them may be Mossad agents.

    Making EVERYTHING about Jews gives Jews far too much credit. So ease up, fellas. There are no Jews in your sandwiches. There are no Jews in your soup. If you have a chest cold, you likely didn’t get it from shaking hands with a Jew…or maybe you did, but that’s what you get for being friendly to Jews.

    The obsession with Jews and Israel is just plain nuts. No more or less nuts than than the Jews who label every criticism of Israel as anti-semitism. Matter of fact, it’s probably the same kind of nuts, just in a different wrapper.

    There is a difference between rational thought and rationalization of feelings. I value rational thought.

    In the past what I have also criticized is the refusal of “anti-Zionists” (or whatever the correct name might be) for failing to deal rationally with the obvious contributions of Islam to the conflict.

    If you have read many of my posts you should realize that I do not think the problems are solvable. The world is headed for population-reducing wars regardless of what anyone does and the problems in the ME, though significant, are not the worst. There will be no winners, just survivors, and they will assign guilt as they wish.

    顺其自然。

    • 同意: Clyde
  46. nickels 说:

    “…I have sworn upon the altar of god eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.”

    Kibbutz mentality is not welcome in America.

  47. @ISmellBagels

    It is easy to identify the Zionazi Syndrome.

    A zionazi is a strident true believer, a sane Jew is able to question any or all of the Israeli government’s doings.

  48. @Connecticut Famer

    Does the following (from Wiki) constitute “foreign influence”?

    “Stanley “Stan” Fischer (Hebrew: סטנלי פישר‎; born October 15, 1943) is an economist and the vice chair of the U.S. Federal Reserve System……he holds dual citizenship in Israel and the United States.[1] He served as governor of the Bank of Israel from 2005 to 2013. He previously served as chief economist at the World Bank.[2] On January 10, 2014, United States President Barack Obama nominated Fischer to be Vice-Chairman of the US Federal Reserve Board of Governors”.

    This puts a new gloss on “You’re either for us or against us” and “We have met the enemy and he is us”.

    Who is us anyway? or as Porgie Tirebiter said, “Gee Dad, I don’t see how you can be the people’s prosecutor and my defense lawyer at the same time”.

    Dad, “Easy, son. This way I can persecute you to the fullest extent of the Law”

    Porgie Tirebiter, “That’s my Dad!”

  49. @Drapetomaniac

    Um, I’m the guy who, when driving my car and making a turn, uses his signal and moves with alacrity so as not to inconvenience you, the driver behind me.

    You, on the other hand, are a self-centered idiot, so none of us can tell what you would do or how you will do it.

    • 回复: @Anonymous
  50. Corvinus 说:
    @Mark Green

    “Zio-supremacists are still pressure governments, still bribing candidates, still distorting history, still censoring critics, and still manipulating public opinion for their own tribal benefit. Their intimidating, global reach undermines the sovereignty and moral rectitude of every host country.”

    Replace “Zio-supremacists” with “Zio-supremacists and Anti-Jew conspiracists” and you are spot on.

    “Jewish supremacism is real.”

    作为非犹太人,您是否无能为力来实际抵消他们所谓的全球影响力?

    我更喜欢人性而不是特定的身份。 亲种族是反人类的代号。

    • 回复: @Oscar Peterson
    , @bunga
  51. @georgesdelatour

    “who think Israel is literally “the most evil country on the planet” ™”

    Tough call. I think they are tied with several other countries but the rankings do change.

    “They’re simply looking after their own interests”

    Looking out for one’s own interest is okay.

    Looking out for one’s own interest at someone else’s expense without their approval is wrong.

    Which is how nature, red in tooth and claw, works. I prefer going the other way and trying to thicken the rather thin veneer of civilization.

    “France and Sweden are discovering that you can either have a strong Jewish community or a strong Muslim community”

    Beside the fact that they let the ME rabble in, which is worse, low-function Muslim sociopaths or high-function Jewish sociopaths?

  52. Corvinus 说:
    @Threecranes

    “As usual, the Jews credit themselves with too much wisdom which leads one to suspect that their convoluted theories may be an elaborate cover to obfuscate the simple fact that they act to enhance their own self interest period–consequences be damned. Too bad if the rest of you get screwed in the process.”

    Replace “the Jews” with “Jews and non-Jews alike” and you would be accurate. You are tribal, right? Are you not minimizing your own tribe’s colossal failures, moral failings, and intellectual inconsistencies?

    • 回复: @Threecranes
  53. Does India have an Israeli Lobby too? They are Israel’s largest arms client. Does China have an Israeli lobby, the subsaharan African countries? All of those countries have good relations with Israel for the Islamic ones and SA.

    Sorry Phil, can’t blame everything on “the Lobby”.

    • 回复: @Wally
    , @annamaria
  54. @another fred

    Islamic and Arabic societies have a lot of problems, no doubt, but they are essentially in the right in the conflict with Israel and the US. The fact that Muslims do some objectionable things does not imply they deserve the lions share of the blame, or even an equal share. Focusing on the Jewish role in the instability in the ME is neither irrational nor counterproductive.

    • 回复: @Clyde
    , @another fred
  55. Anonymous • 免责声明 说:
    @Threecranes

    Nice reply for a third grader.

    “You, on the other hand, are a self-centered idiot, so none of us can tell what you would do or how you will do it.”

    Treat political beliefs like religious beliefs and allow others to opt out of whatever you and the other government lovers believe in. You are not God, and 7+ billion of your kind are not God, so stop pretending that you are. You and those you elect can’t run jack shit except to destroy it. Why don’t you mull over all the death and destruction government has caused in its history – only a fool or the devil could want it.

    The world is government run, and like many many times in the past, it’s going to hell because of it.

    Way past time to try something different.

  56. all these years and Jews still can’t get over not having the same global reach and presence as the Vatican.

    A lot of people don’t like Catholics, but they don’t spend 3/4 of their lives whining that “everybody hates us.”
    They don’t start wars in other people’s countries.
    They don’t try to destroy other people’s economies.
    They don’t insinuate themselves into other people’s governments and institutions and demand special favors.
    True, Catholics defend their interests where they conflict with those of a particular government or institution.
    But they don’t do so by killing people (not recently, anyway) or blackmailing them or threatening their careers.
    They try to get along.
    Even with Israelis.
    Just a few days ago the Pope met with the leader of Iran. It has not been reported if either man had a lightening rod installed in his head.

    Maybe Jews could take a lesson from the way the Vatican and institutional Roman Catholicism has reformed and revised and rethought its ways of relating with its neighbors and the rest of the people in the world, to the extent that the Vatican now has friendly diplomatic relations — and respect — in all of these states and international institutions:

    [更多]

    Algiers (Apostolic Nunciature)
    安哥拉
    Luanda (Apostolic Nunciature)
    贝宁
    Cotonou (Apostolic Nunciature)
    布隆迪
    Bujumbura (Apostolic Nunciature)
    喀麦隆
    Yaoundé (Apostolic Nunciature)
    中非共和国
    Bangui (Apostolic Nunciature)
    查德
    N’Djamena (Apostolic Nunciature)
    刚果民主共和国
    Brazzaville (Apostolic Nunciature)
    刚果民主共和国
    Kinshasa (Apostolic Nunciature)
    科特迪瓦
    Abidjan (Apostolic Nunciature)
    埃及
    Cairo (Apostolic Nunciature)
    埃塞俄比亚
    Addis Ababa (Apostolic Nunciature)
    加蓬
    Libreville (Apostolic Nunciature)
    加纳
    Accra (Apostolic Nunciature)
    几内亚
    Conakry (Apostolic Nunciature)
    肯尼亚
    Nairobi (Apostolic Nunciature)
    马达加斯加
    Antananarivo (Apostolic Nunciature)
    摩洛哥
    Rabat (Apostolic Nunciature)
    莫桑比克
    Maputo (Apostolic Nunciature)
    尼日利亚
    Abuja (Apostolic Nunciature)
    卢旺达
    Kigali (Apostolic Nunciature)
    塞内加尔
    Dakar (Apostolic Nunciature)
    南非
    Pretoria (Apostolic Nunciature)
    南苏丹
    Juba (Apostolic Nunciature)[4]
    苏丹
    Khartoum (Apostolic Nunciature)
    坦桑尼亚
    Dar es Salaam (Apostolic Nunciature)
    乌干达
    Kampala (Apostolic Nunciature)
    赞比亚
    Lusaka (Apostolic Nunciature)
    津巴布韦
    Harare (Apostolic Nunciature)
    Americas[edit]
    安提瓜和巴布达
    St. John’s (Apostolic Nunciature)
    Argentina
    Buenos Aires (Apostolic Nunciature)
    玻利维亚
    La Paz (Apostolic Nunciature)
    Brasil
    Brasília (Apostolic Nunciature)
    加拿大
    Ottawa (Apostolic Nunciature)
    智利
    Santiago (Apostolic Nunciature)
    哥伦比亚
    Bogotá (Apostolic Nunciature)
    哥斯达黎加
    San José (Apostolic Nunciature)
    古巴
    Havana (Apostolic Nunciature)
    多明尼加共和国
    Santo Domingo (Apostolic Nunciature)
    厄瓜多尔
    Quito (Apostolic Nunciature)
    萨尔瓦多
    San Salvador (Apostolic Nunciature)
    危地马拉
    Guatemala City (Apostolic Nunciature)
    海地
    Port-au-Prince (Apostolic Nunciature)
    洪都拉斯
    Tegucigalpa (Apostolic Nunciature)
    墨西哥
    Mexico City (Apostolic Nunciature)
    尼加拉瓜
    Managua (Apostolic Nunciature)
    巴拿马
    Panama City (Apostolic Nunciature)
    巴拉圭
    Asunción (Apostolic Nunciature)
    秘鲁
    Lima (Apostolic Nunciature)
    特立尼达和多巴哥
    Port of Spain (Apostolic Nunciature)
    美国
    Washington, D.C. (Apostolic Nunciature)
    乌拉圭
    Montevideo (Apostolic Nunciature)
    委内瑞拉
    Caracas (Apostolic Nunciature)
    Asia[edit]
    孟加拉国
    Dhaka (Apostolic Nunciature)
    中华民国
    Taipei (Apostolic Nunciature)
    格鲁吉亚
    Tbilisi (Apostolic Nunciature)
    印度
    New Delhi (Apostolic Nunciature)
    印度尼西亚
    Jakarta (Apostolic Nunciature)
    伊朗
    Tehran (Apostolic Nunciature)
    伊拉克
    Baghdad (Apostolic Nunciature)
    以色列
    Tel Aviv (Apostolic Nunciature)
    Jerusalem (Apostolic Delegation)
    日本
    Tokyo (Apostolic Nunciature)
    约旦
    Amman (Apostolic Nunciature)
    哈萨克斯坦
    Astana (Apostolic Nunciature)
    吉尔吉斯斯坦
    Bishkek (Apostolic Nunciature)
    韩国
    Seoul (Apostolic Nunciature)
    科威特
    Kuwait City (Apostolic Nunciature)
    黎巴嫩
    Harissa (Apostolic Nunciature)
    马来西亚
    Kuala Lumpur (Apostolic Nunciature)
    巴基斯坦
    Islamabad (Apostolic Nunciature)
    菲律宾
    Manila (Apostolic Nunciature)
    新加坡
    Singapore (Apostolic Nunciature)
    斯里兰卡
    Colombo (Apostolic Nunciature)
    叙利亚
    Damascus (Apostolic Nunciature)
    泰国
    Bangkok (Apostolic Nunciature)
    土耳其
    Ankara (Apostolic Nunciature)
    土库曼斯坦
    Ashgabat (Apostolic Nunciature)
    乌兹别克斯坦
    Tashkent (Apostolic Nunciature)
    欧洲[编辑]
    阿尔巴尼亚
    Tirana (Apostolic Nunciature)
    奥地利
    Vienna (Apostolic Nunciature)
    白俄罗斯
    Minsk (Apostolic Nunciature)
    比利时
    Brussels (Apostolic Nunciature)
    波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那
    Sarajevo (Apostolic Nunciature)
    保加利亚
    Sofia (Apostolic Nunciature)
    克罗地亚
    Zagreb (Apostolic Nunciature)
    塞浦路斯
    Nicosia (Apostolic Nunciature)
    捷克共和国
    Prague (Apostolic Nunciature)
    法国
    Paris (Apostolic Nunciature)
    Strasbourg (Office)
    德国
    Berlin (Apostolic Nunciature)
    希腊
    Athens (Apostolic Nunciature)
    匈牙利
    Budapest (Apostolic Nunciature)
    爱尔兰
    Dublin (Apostolic Nunciature)
    意大利
    Rome (Apostolic Nunciature)
    立陶宛
    Vilnius (Apostolic Nunciature)
    马耳他
    Rabat (Apostolic Nunciature)
    Nederland
    The Hague (Apostolic Nunciature)
    波兰
    Warsaw (Apostolic Nunciature)
    葡萄牙
    Lisbon (Apostolic Nunciature)
    罗马尼亚
    Bucharest (Apostolic Nunciature)
    俄罗斯
    Moscow (Apostolic Nunciature)
    圣马力诺
    San Marino (Apostolic Nunciature)
    塞尔维亚
    Belgrade (Apostolic Nunciature)
    斯洛伐克
    Bratislava (Apostolic Nunciature)
    斯洛文尼亚
    Ljubljana (Apostolic Nunciature)
    西班牙
    Madrid (Apostolic Nunciature)
    瑞典
    Stockholm (Apostolic Nunciature)
    瑞士
    Bern (Apostolic Nunciature)
    乌克兰
    Kiev (Apostolic Nunciature)
    英国
    London (Apostolic Nunciature)
    Oceania[edit]
    澳大利亚
    Canberra (Apostolic Nunciature)
    新西兰
    Wellington (Apostolic Nunciature)
    巴布亚新几内亚
    Port Moresby (Apostolic Nunciature)
    Multilateral organisations[edit]
    Permanent Observer of the Holy See to the United Nations (at the headquarters of the U.N.) (New York)
    Permanent Observer of Holy See to the United Nations (at the European office of the U.N.) (Geneva)

    • 回复: @helena
  57. Wally 说: • 您的网站
    @Maj. Kong

    There’s nothing wrong with being an “antisemite”. It’s a normal, healthy, righteous reaction to Zionist racism, thievery, & violence.
    Not to mention the billions in US taxpayers money supremacist Jews extract from the controlled US Govt. each year.

    谁管理美联储?
    谁经营华尔街?
    谁拥有美国国会?
    谁拥有白宫?
    谁强迫接受虚拟的和不可能的“ 6M和毒气室”?
    谁负责媒体/娱乐?
    谁主宰“学术界”?
    为什么AIPAC是最强大,最占主导地位的游说团体,它定期编写国会法案和决议案文?
    谁想要通过“仇恨言论”鸭嘴来审查言论自由?
    是谁要求我们为美军的利益流血?
    谁是地球上最大的种族主义者?

    http://news.sky.com/story/678761/israeli-army-t-shirts-mock-gaza-killings
    “以色列军队 T 恤模拟加沙杀戮”
    Pregnant women and children being targeted by Jews.

    和:
    两名以色列少女在希伯来语中举着标语牌:“仇视阿拉伯人不是种族主义,而是价值观。”
    eemingly endless Zionist organizations engaged in propaganda

    http://electronicintifada.net/blogs/asa-winstanley/israel-tech-site-paying-interns-covertly-plant-stories-social-media
    以色列科技网站向“实习生”付费,在社交媒体中暗中种植故事

    http://electronicintifada.net/blogs/ali-abunimah/israeli-students-get-2000-spread-state-propaganda-facebook
    以色列学生获得 2,000 美元用于在 Facebook 上进行国家宣传

    http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=6175

    犹太互联网防御部队
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_Internet_Defense_Force

    犹太复国主义维基百科编辑课程 http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/139189

    • 回复: @Sherman
  58. AndrewR 说:

    It’s almost like the German NatSocs were onto something….

    • 回复: @Druid
  59. Wally 说: • 您的网站
    @Greasy WIlliam

    “Good relation\$” only for those who buy and sell arms.

    You’re desperately reaching, Greasy Hasbara

  60. annamaria 说:
    @Clyde

    Sounds like another approach to demonizing the honest Margot Wallstrom. So what was the rationale for murdering Folke Bernadotte, another good person from Sweden, by the Israeli terrorists? He was not a feminize. Moreover, during the WWII, Bernadotte “negotiated the release of about 31,000 prisoners from German concentration camps including 450 Danish Jews from the Theresienstadt camp.” Still not kosher enough?
    “They don’t want peace and justice…” Could you tell the Unz readers, honestly, that the ziocons wants “peace and justice?” No way. Or you believe that the facts have “anti-semitic” bias? The waves of the undesirable muslims to Europe are the direct result of the aggressive wars in the Middle East by the US/EU. These wars were designed and promoted by the leading ziocons. See the above article that explains the power of Lobbies in the major western nations.
    “Historically, Israel has always sought to dismember the countries surrounding her:” http://www.voltairenet.org/article186019.html

  61. annamaria 说:
    @Greasy WIlliam

    Have India and China led the wars of aggression in the Middle East against the formerly functioning states of Iraq, Libya, and Syria?

    • 回复: @tariq
  62. @Corvinus

    “Are you not minimizing your own tribe’s colossal failures…”

    My tribe’s colossal failures et al are not at issue here. We were discussing the fact that Netanyahu specifically and Zionist interest groups generally are using their clout to implement legislation in foreign nations that would inhibit free speech when that speech casts a negative light on Israeli aggression and hypocrisy.

    My feelings about Israel’s right to either defend itself or to expand its borders, peacefully or through war, have nothing whatsoever to do with my reaction to the restriction of my rights to free speech in my own country–especially when this infringement is undertaken by a foreign power.

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  63. DaveE 说:

    You all realize, of course, that Charlie Hebdo also spells “Heb liar code”…… well, really close anyway.

    A fine reminder by Mr. Giraldi that if we’re ever going to live in a peaceful, just and fair world, the Worlds Oldest Ethnic Mafia needs to be…… well……

    I’m not a Christian, but I’d recommend John Ch. 8 if you want to understand what we’re really dealing with here.

  64. Mike1 说:

    People always viscerally hate those smarter than themselves. Every group tries to advance its position. The best manage to do so. It is no secret that there is more brainpower in Israel than in most societies so they win more often.

    But look at who they are fighting against. People like the author and the people commenting here. People who take out big mortgages then think lending is a conspiracy against them. It must be hard not to win everything sometimes.

    • 回复: @tariq
    , @annamaria
  65. Art 说:
    @marwan

    and yet there are almost zero news articles about chinese occupation of tibet , turkish occupation of cyprus , indonesian occupation of papua , moroccan occupation of western sahara ……….

    This is Jew 101 – always point out that others are bad – thus Jews can be bad. The West condemns these states for what they do – thus Israel must be condemned.

    Of course the big lie is that Zionist Israel is a Wester state – it is not.

    Western states do not hide their nukes.

    Wester states are not apartheid states.

    Western states do not imprison a million people as in Gaza.

    Western states do not allow white sex slavery.

    Wester states do not have a state religion.

    Israel is a Jewish state – not a Western state.

    By all standards – Israel is an evil state.

  66. Art 说:

    Using the word “lobby” to describe Jew political activity is a lie. They are an army taught from birth to follow their tribal leaders.

    One wonders why Jews in the face of all the evil that Israel does – still support it?

    It is their culture from birth to do so. The truth is that a Jew is a Jew is a Jew – they can NEVER be one of us – when called upon, they will lie, intimidate, and even maim for their leaders. They have no scruples when it comes to tribal matters. The will conspire to advance Jew power – nothing is sacred, but tribe.

    With the creation of Israel, most every Jew is a fifth column in the country where they reside.

    The Jew are more then a lobby – they are a tribal army.

    • 回复: @DaveE
  67. Priss Factor [又名“多米尼克·弗兰肯学会”] 说: • 您的网站

    http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2016/02/08/jane-fonda-dangerous-trump-creating-young-terrorists-racism/

    What a joke. This is what happens in a nation where we cannot speak the truth. Yes, the truth about Jewish Power. If any people are to blame for Muslim terrorism, it is Jews. Jews ethnically cleansed Palestinians, which is why Palestinians turned to terror to resist Zionism(just like Algerians used terrorism against French Imperialism). Also, the Middle East was mostly stable before the Gulf War. Who led the US into that war? Neocon Jews in the first Bush administration.
    Yes, there were always terrorists, but most of the Middle East was ruled by strongmen who got tough with terrorists in their own nations. Hussein didn’t tolerate terrorists in Iraq. Iranian government didn’t tolerate terrorists in Iran. Assad didn’t tolerate terrorists in Syria. Military government in Algeria used all its might to suppress jihadis there. Gaddaffy didn’t tolerate terrorists in Libya. Of course, these governments sometimes sponsored terrorism against OTHER nations, but Israel and US were no different in this. Israel created Hamas to fight the PLO. Israel aided Christian terrorists against Muslim terrorists in Lebanon. US aided Mujahadeen terrorists in Afghanistan the Soviet-backed government.

    Even so, the Middle East and North Africa had been mostly stable for the simple reason that most nations had strongmen at the helm to clamp down on terrorism in their own nations. The most effective enemy of terrorism is the powerful state. State power can hunt down terrorists and prevent terror from spreading like a cancer.

    But US’s so-called “War on Terror” pursued policies that could only lead to the increase in terrorism. War on Terror toppled the strongman in Iraq. So, Iraq became a hotbed of free lance terrorists. US toppled Gaddafi in Libya, and North Africa became a free zone of terrorists. Without a strongman to keep things under lid, terrorist ran riot. This was a replay of what the US did with Afghanistan. If the Soviet-backed government in Kabul had been left alone, it would have consolidated power. But US subverted Afghanistan, thus leading to the eventual toppling of the Kabul government and the takeover of Afghanistan by all sorts of terrorist groups.

    US then ‘Afghanized’ Iraq and Libya. And then, US worked with its allies(Israel, Saudis, Turkey) to ‘Afghanize’ Syria, and Syria is now a battleground with terrorists running riot all around.

    Why did US policy take this turn? Because globalist-Zionists gained total power of US government, media, finance, and cuck politicians who do little else but sing hosannas to Israel and bend over to Jewish demands. The so-called War on Terror has become War FOR Terror.

    After all, there is no better way to increase terrorism than by destabilizing governments in places like Iraq, Libya, and Syria. Without strong central authority, every clan or tribe can pick up AK-47s & bombs, get funding from cynical Saudi Wahabis, and raise hell all over the place.

    I think this was intentional on the part of Jewish Power Elite. Jews claim to do one thing but do the very opposite. Jews want Israel to be the only great power in the region. And that mean weakening and destroying other nations in the region. And what better way to destroy them than by weakening their central governments and letting terrorists fill the vacuum.

    But since Jews own the media, we are supposed to believe that the likes of Clinton, Bush II, and Obama have been doing their utmost to wage war on terror. What a joke.

    • 回复: @rvg
  68. Corvinus 说:
    @Threecranes

    “My tribe’s colossal failures et al are not at issue here. We were discussing the fact that Netanyahu specifically and Zionist interest groups generally are using their clout to implement legislation in foreign nations that would inhibit free speech when that speech casts a negative light on Israeli aggression and hypocrisy.”

    And there is the fact that your tribe has also engaged in similar actions against real and perceived threats. Any group inside or outside America that fails to meet your standards must be expunged or expelled or liquidated.

    “My feelings about Israel’s right to either defend itself or to expand its borders, peacefully or through war, have nothing whatsoever to do with my reaction to the restriction of my rights to free speech in my own country–especially when this infringement is undertaken by a foreign power.”

    That is an observably false statement. You are able to speak your mind on a wide range of topics in the open square. Israel or Saudi Arabia or Luxembourg are not interfering with your liberty in this regard. Indeed, there are consequences for one’s opinions. Free speech has never been free.

    • 回复: @Threecranes
    , @Art
  69. Sherman 说:
    @Wally

    And I thought your parents taught you to respect Jews. 🙂

    I guess they taught you to respect Jews while they sang the Horst Wessel as a lullaby to you.

    • 回复: @Wally
  70. alexander 说:

    尊敬的吉拉尔迪先生,

    Thanks for an excellent article.

    We need a tough gutsy POTUS to win the next election.

    One that will not merely stand up to the lobby…..but put the vast majority of its wealthiest and most powerful proponents where they belong……Federal prison or Guantanamo Bay.

    The charges should be nearly self-evident by now.

    “Conspiracy to Defraud the United States of America” and “Conspiracy to Commit a Terrorist act”.

    This should include several dozen CEO’s and owners of all the major networks and newspapers who defrauded Americans out of trillions of dollars to initiate an illegal war of aggression in Iraq.

    This “clean sweep” initiative would yield close to one trillion dollars to the american taxpayer, right out of the gate, ( with perhaps more down the line)… and act as potent exorcising tonic to all our representatives in Government trapped under the lobby’s twin spells of extortion and bribery.

    It would alleviate the pressure on our “news personalities” to continue defrauding Americans by auctioning up the lobby owned media enterprises( in which they are employed ) to fresh bidders unconnected to the lobby’s international campaign of terrorism and perpetual war..

    Not only would this bold action by the POTUS, stabilize the economy, but it would dramatically arrest the free fall , 19 trillion dollar (and counting) national debt the Lobby’s pernicious overspending has generated.

    It would profoundly revitalize our country’s ability to debate the ways we can most rapidly HEAL our Nation after the decade and a half of brutal ,lobby induced, terroristic, top- down totalitarianism.

    It would permit the G.A.O. to go to work again…with some real bite…and help restore a modicum of efficiency to our Military spending.

    The next POTUS could be a true Robin Hood, who ends up hanging the lobby( quite deservedly) with the self same terrorist noose they created….and finally bring them down.

    A Post-Lobby World would be the greatest gift the next President could give to every future generation of Americans.

    A world Liberated from the Lobby’s terroristic fraud, ruthless malevolence, and bogus “above the law” Supremacism would be more than welcome to the vast majority of decent people on the planet, who have had to endure way too many of their heinous, cruel, and unending catastrophes .

    Enough is enough .

    • 回复: @Corvinus
    , @Carroll Price
  71. @Corvinus

    Let me amend Philip Giraldi’s statement,

    ” That is why any negative story [or comment, in this case] appearing in the U.S. about Israel is immediately inundated with pro-Israel comments, many of which make exactly the same coordinated points while exhibiting the same somewhat less than perfect English [or Logic, in your case].”

    Your responses are off target and incoherent.

  72. Art 说:
    @Corvinus

    That is an observably false statement. You are able to speak your mind on a wide range of topics in the open square. Israel or Saudi Arabia or Luxembourg are not interfering with your liberty in this regard.

    Say Corvinus, (Corporal Moshe’s Internet Marauders)

    Woo – what a lie – if I send a letter to the editor of any paper in America, complaining about Israeli nukes – it will not be publish – you know that! The editor would lose his job if he published it.

    See – you will get in people’s face and tell any lie for your tribe.

    Does the concept of karma have relevance to the Jew?

    艺术

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  73. Rehmat 说:
    @Anonymous

    Canada’s all four major parties had long been “Israelized”. The worse government had been Conservatives under Stephen Harper. The NDP and Parti Quebecois is also controlled by Zionist Jews through intermarriages or by election funding and media support. Canada’s 70% mainstream media is owned by Zionists.

    Same goes for current Liberal Party led by prime minister Justin Trudeau.

    Personally, I liked several of Trudeau’s election promises – but always doubted his foreign policy agenda, especially in Middle East. Based on his family background and his support for the Zionist entity as opposition leader, I never believed his policy would be much different than Stephen Harper’s Zionist-butts-licking policy. Justin’s father Pierre Elliott Trudeau was the first Canadian prime minister to appoint a Jew in his cabinet. He also dated Hollywood Jewish singer and actress Barbara Streisand for years in the 1970s….

    https://rehmat1.com/2016/01/05/canada-trudeau-vs-harper/

  74. Corvinus 说:

    I am always amazed by the SJW’s, or the pro-white, or the Jooish conspiracy theorists how they are somehow the smartest people in the room, with deep insight into how and why their ideological enemies operate, that anyone who opposes them are “off target and incoherent”, and that the majority of people are blind and stupid.

    Rather than impotently post on a blog about Joos ruling the world, why don’t you actually engage in a grass roots effort door to door, as in foot traffic, to convince those who are ignorant of this master plan by Joos. Publish your work. Conduct podcasts. Film yourself. Go to campaign rallies and spread the word.

    My comments are inaccurately characterized as being “pro-Jew”. I am pro-humanity, anti-race. There is a difference.

    Note that you chose not to distance yourself with my assertion that your tribe seeks to expunge or expel or liquidate anyone who fails to meet your standards.

    Again, it is obscenely clear the intentions of your own tribe, which, according to your logic, is no different than the Joos.

    • 回复: @Oscar Peterson
  75. Corvinus 说:
    @Art

    “if I send a letter to the editor of any paper in America, complaining about Israeli nukes – it will not be publish – you know that.”

    这并不完全正确。

    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/oct/5/letter-to-the-editor-for-israel-nuclear-weapons-a-/

    http://www.oregonlive.com/opinion/index.ssf/2015/09/when_iran_nukes_israel_blame_o.html

    http://www.nj.com/opinion/index.ssf/2015/09/if_israel_can_have_nukes_why_not_iran_hintons_view.html

    “See – you will get in people’s face and tell any lie for your tribe.”

    I’m white and not Jewish. 🙂

    • 回复: @Art
    , @Oscar Peterson
  76. tariq 说:
    @annamaria

    Hey , since wn’s and alt right types dont exist in real life and never get their pasty rear ends off of internet comment sections , i know you guys are here to answer this question. Q. How is it that jews are able to control all western governments , all western media , all western academia, all western armies , but they cant seem to control this website, which is owned by a jew lol ??

    • 回复: @annamaria
  77. Corvinus 说:
    @alexander

    “One that will not merely stand up to the lobby…..but put the vast majority of its wealthiest and most powerful proponents where they belong……Federal prison or Guantanamo Bay.”

    So, how do you propose to carry out your plan, considering that some Joos are American citizens and are protected by the Constitution against illegal search and seizure and arrest without evidence?

    Moreover, how would you address the millions of non-Jewish Americans who would be in harm’s way should they choose to defend the liberties of citizens from your tyranny?

    “It would alleviate the pressure on our “news personalities” to continue defrauding Americans by auctioning up the lobby owned media enterprises( in which they are employed ) to fresh bidders unconnected to the lobby’s international campaign of terrorism and perpetual war.”

    Would not the new POTUS then install his own “news personalities” to defraud Americans through his own lobby, compliments of his own tribe, in an effort to ensure that his agenda, one you sponsor, would be jackbooted onto citizens of America who may not agree with such agenda? How would you respond to this “betrayal” by John and Sarah Q. Public?

    • 回复: @alexander
  78. tariq 说:
    @Mike1

    These commenters don’t exist in real life . Have you ever in all your days heard people espouse these beliefs in real life ??
    These type of echo chambers solve a real purpose . Without them we would find more alt right wn types taking the dylan roof route. This way they take out their frustration and inadequacies in comment sections harmlessly . People forget these comments minutes after reading them . The commenters become obsessed with jews and spend all their time online reading and posting conspiracy nonsense , thusly getting soft and even more unhealthy in the process. The jew wins again. LoL . Decks stacked against you white man !!! Damned if you do , damned if you dont !!!

    • 回复: @Clyde
  79. Bill Jones 说:
    @georgesdelatour

    Any country that has as its primary foreign policy goal the continued subversion of the US government is a enemy to be not only opposed but destroyed.

  80. alexander 说:
    @Corvinus

    Why are you so addicted to fraud, Corvinus, that you assume, right out of the gate, that a “Robin Hood” POTUS would endorse fraud by anybody?

    Why is fraud an essential characteristic to you, Corvinus, and what you falsely believe is needed to rule over people ?

    What about rejecting ALL fraud, which is what should be happening anyway, and do away with any who purport to endorse it ?

    Whats wrong with that ?

    Shouldn’t defrauding the American people be a one way ticket for any who advocate it to federal prison or Guantanamo Bay?

    if it shouldn’t, Corvinus, why shouldn’t it be ?

    Who has taught you fraud is good Corvinus ?

    Who has taught you fraud is okay ?

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  81. Art 说:
    @Corvinus

    科维努斯,

    You win – I lose this one. Good post.

    You say your are not a Jew – why do you defend them – the tribe is destroying America, Europe, and the ME?

    Many Jews are decent people until tribe comes up – then they feel free to do wrong, like kill free speech. You are not going to deny that are you?

    艺术

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  82. @Oscar Peterson

    very simple really, the holocaust victim card doesn’t work in china. japan did the same or worst to them. at least the germans didn’t use the jews as guinea pigs for their experiments.

    china or any asian country really, doesn’t give a shit about jews or the holocaust. Hell I bet most of them have some bloody history of their own.

  83. Svigor 说:

    one newspaper close to the government suggested that she might be assassinated, as fellow Swede Count Folke Bernadotte was by Jewish militants in 1948, because anti-Semitism appears to be in the Swedish DNA.

    Sounds about par for the Jewish Supremacist course: “we’re racists, so if we murder a European pol we’ll say it’s because they’re racist.”

    All of this is just the flowering of the Jewish Culture, which is being brought into line with Jewish nature, in Israel. It’s sort of like how black culture “collapsed” after Civil Rights; blacks felt free to stop trying to live up to white norms, and started expressing and living out their true natures. Similarly, Jews in Israel run the show there, so they don’t have to worry about shandas for de goyim.

    Indeed, it is a global phenomenon. Wherever one goes – Western Europe, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and the United States – there is a well-organized and funded lobby ready, willing and able to go to war to protect Israel.

    That’s not global. It’s European. We’re doomed to form Jews’ preferred environments. Wealthy, technologically advanced, high trust, high tolerance. Perfect suckers.

    and yet there are almost zero news articles about chinese occupation of tibet , turkish occupation of cyprus , indonesian occupation of papua , moroccan occupation of western sahara ……….

    And yet Chinese, Turkish, Indonesian, and Moroccan lobbies aren’t really an obstacle to Europeans and European-Americans having for themselves what Jews having for themselves in Israel. The greatest obstacle is diaspora Jewry, which, while strongly supporting Jews having for themselves what Jews have in Israel, vehemently denies the same the same to Europeans and European-Americans. Jewry pursues and supports right-wing gov’t in Israel, then works to destroy right-wing movements elsewhere.

    Perhaps more importantly, if you condemn the Chinese, Turkish, Indonesian, or Moroccan occupations and lobbies (they have no Apartheid States to criticize, like Israel does), you aren’t swarmed by hasbarists telling you water’s wet and day is night.

    承认自己是一个彻头彻尾的反犹太主义者,The Right Stuff 有很多朋友已经克服了心理冲击。

    Agreed. “Anti-Semitism” is a moral imperative. Embrace it.

    Unfortunately, stating these near-obvious facts probably means you’re an ‘anti-Semite’, Mr. Giraldi. (And a virulent one at that!)

    And odious, don’t forget odious. Oh yes, and noxious as well.

    It is incredible what such a small group of determined maniacs can accomplish with the cowardly and clueless mass of sheep. But one of their fatal flaws is that they never know when to quit. Their continued push for more power and control will be their undoing, once again.

    Sort of. Yes, they always push, that’s what grifters do. Yes, eventually this will result in backlash #4891, it always does. But when it’s over, they’ll just fold the “unprovoked anti-Semitic attack” into their narrative of “mystical anti-Semitism,” which will feed back into their “keep whipping ourselves into a self-serving frenzy” model.

    Evicting them from a society and folding “anti-Semitism” into the national culture is the only defense. And it must be bolstered with a strong educational plan, so people don’t forget.

    But by all means, let us focus on the pittance of 5 billion bestowed upon Israel.

    No, let’s put a stop to it. After all, it’s a mere “pittance” and won’t be missed.

    And let us also ignore the trillions the rest of the Middle East costs us. Ignore China’s hacking and tampering and theft of software and technologies and military challenges (fleas, but still) and ignore the South Koreans and what they cost and ignore all the rest that dwarfs Israel.

    Yes, why do the Israelis ignore everything, and make such a big deal about Palestinians and ISIS? Jim Xtian knows the Israelis are ‘tards.

    I’m also grateful to Jim Xtian for pointing out that China, ISIS, Al-Qaeda, and Israel are in the same category.

    Wow, with this all powerful Jewish – er, excuse me, Zionist – conspiracy that rules the world and the media and the Internet I don’t understand how Giraldi has the freedom to continually bash Israel the way he does.

    Behold the Jewish genius for argumentation. E.g., the sun doesn’t provide warmth – it’s cold in Antarctica. Jesse Owens didn’t run fast – a horse runs faster. Please read his arguments to your nearest third-grader, I’m sure he’ll find them convincing.

    One can’t help but envy China. Imagine a nation-state possessing cultural anti-bodies that give it virtual immunity from the pestilence of Jewish/Zionist influence. Is there any way they could bottle it and sell it?

    Jews lack the biological profile to prey on east Asians; they don’t look anything like them.

    The feminized Euro-cowards who rule Sweden should worry more about the Muslim immigration invasion they are submitting to and less about how Israel wrangles its Muslims.

    Not according to the “right wing” gov’t of Israel, or the Jewish diaspora. According to them, Sweden should roll over and spread ’em for the Muslim invasion.

    Show me Bibi’s quotes supporting (or encouraging) the European right’s struggle against the Muslim invasion. Show me the Israeli right’s.

    Show me where Bibi or prominent Israeli rightists condemn the Euro feminazis for anything that doesn’t involve Israeli self-interest.

    I feel no affiliation to Israel. But nor do I feel they’re creepily sinister or demonic. They’re simply looking after their own interests – which aren’t always the same as our interests. We’d do better to imitate them than forcefully oppose them.

    Bibi doesn’t feel that way. He denounced Trump and distanced himself from his comments about immigration. You know, because he’s so “right wing.”

    It’s not even the most evil country in the Middle East.

    Great, here’s Israel’s gold medal in the moral special olympics.

    The average Arab living in Israel proper (not the Occupied Territories) is probably better off than the average Arab in most of the Middle East. It’s far easier to be an out-of-the-closet gay Arab, or out-of-the-closet atheist Arab, in Israel than in Egypt.

    Blacks in America are far better off than blacks in sub-Saharan Africa. Ask a diaspora Jew to take up that talking point. Hell, ask an 以色列 to take up that talking point. Hell, ask an Israeli “settler” to take it up.

    France and Sweden are discovering that you can either have a strong Jewish community or a strong Muslim community, but you can’t have both.

    I’d rather have a strong Muslim community. Just as devious, with half the ability to do harm.

    People always viscerally hate those smarter than themselves.

    No they don’t. I can believe that you do, and project that onto others, though.

    • 回复: @marwan
  84. @georgesdelatour

    “They’re simply looking after their own interests – which aren’t always the same as our interests.”

    First, it’s not a question of not “always” having the same interests. Being seen to support the establishment of a Jewish state in the Middle East was NEVER in the interest of the US. How could it be? We have fish to fry globally, and the imposition of a Jewish state on unwilling Arabs was bound to generate widespread and long-lasting enmity to the US. Don’t try to minimize this strategic disaster by suggesting that it is only sometimes that our interests diverge. The existence of Israel and our role as its primary golem is an unmitigated strategic disaster for us.

    The problem is that Israel and its fifth column/lobby in the US essentially demand that the US sacrifice its interests to those of Israel. There is no way around this basic problem.

    “The average Arab living in Israel proper (not the Occupied Territories) is probably better off than the average Arab in most of the Middle East.”

    不相关。

  85. @Corvinus

    Your post is utterly incoherent.

    Rather than engaging in vague and pointless whining, why don’t you identify specific posts that you oppose and argue against them?

    And if you thing employing the construct “Joo” is going to achieve something, you’d better think again.

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  86. annamaria 说:
    @Mike1

    Some of the most intelligent Jewish people have been critical of the zionist project in the Middle East. http://dissidentvoice.org/2010/04/jewish-critics-of-zionism-and-of-israels-treatment-of-the-palestinians/
    “People always viscerally hate those smarter than themselves.” Inadvertently, you have reminded the readers about the zionists’ visceral hatred towards the civilization of Iran. The ancient state of Iran, that existed for thousands of years, had made an enormous contribution to the western civilization, whereas the ancient Jewish state had been of some significance for a speckle of 200 years and as for the greatness of the noble moral tradition of Judaism it is of no interest for zionists. (The ancient Israel also survived by a borrowed monotheism and by some rather unpleasant stories, like the one told on Purim). The absolute majority of all Jewish achievements in the modern sciences and fine arts have been accomplished in the context of other nations’ cultural development. This obvious facts does not diminish in the least the achievements, but it hopefully could help you to get a different perspective on your idea of smartness. You have perhaps also noticed that while the world Jewry is very fond of the fairy of tale of a motherland-Israel in the Middle East, the majority of smartest Jewish people have no desire to live there. The newcomers to Israel have been predominantly economic migrants. For instance, the smartest Soviet Jews tried their best to avoid going to Israel and/or used Israel as a transit to other countries.

  87. annamaria 说:
    @tariq

    It has been very profitable for the zionists (and ziocons) to conflate Jews with Zionists. If you have not noticed yet, there is a difference between Einstein and Lansky, between Janus Korchak and Mossad provocateurs.

  88. Clyde 说:
    @Jim Christian

    Smelly bagels has really bested you this time around. He called you a hasbara agent twice! He showed you!!

  89. Clyde 说:
    @Beefcake the Mighty

    Islamic and Arabic societies have a lot of problems, no doubt, but they are essentially in the right in the conflict with Israel and the US. The fact that Muslims do some objectionable things does not imply they deserve the lions share of the blame, or even an equal share. Focusing on the Jewish role in the instability in the ME is neither irrational nor counterproductive.

    The biggest source of Greater Middle East insatiability is the ages old Sunni-Shiite conflict. Sometimes its on a very low simmer on the back burner but right now the pot is boiling away with hundred of thousands of Muslims killed by Muslims in the last few years. Also Christians killed by the thousands as collateral damage. Ages old Christian communities being driven out of Iraq and Syria by ISIS and similar type Sunni Jihadists.
    The Jews of the Middle East would be suffering the same fate as the Christians except for one fact. They have their own nation and plenty of firepower.

  90. Clyde 说:
    @tariq

    Humorous insight and true. Call it the soft white underbelly. And getting softer the more they post.

  91. nickels 说:
    @Jim Christian

    “identifies you as a Palestinian goat herder that gets a chubby from his lambs. I guess facts don’t make it through to the streets your herd your Muslim-raped goats through.”

    Hmmm. Well, either Hasbara or some kind of redneck that knows all the latest sand land jibes.

  92. rvg 说:
    @Priss Factor

    比如说,你要多关注涌入美国、加拿大和澳大利亚等国家的成群结队的中国人、印度人、黑人和穆斯林,而不是那里的少量犹太人。

    • 回复: @Priss Factor
  93. marwan 说:
    @Svigor

    “And yet Chinese, Turkish, Indonesian, and Moroccan lobbies aren’t really an obstacle to Europeans and European-Americans having for themselves what Jews having for themselves in Israel. ”

    哦,所以你嫉妒犹太人能够完成白人民族主义者无能完成的事情。 至少你承认你的嫉妒。 向你致敬。 开始生孩子,而不是经常在互联网上发表论文。 白人每对夫妇生 1.1 个孩子 LMFAO !!!!!!!!!

    “Perhaps more importantly, if you condemn the Chinese, Turkish, Indonesian, or Moroccan occupations and lobbies (they have no Apartheid States to criticize, like Israel does), you aren’t swarmed by hasbarists telling you water’s wet and day is night.”

    Every Islamic state is a true apartheid state . Israel is not , muslims voting and serving in knessest . Free worship of muslims , mosques etc. Converting from Islam to christianity is a death penalty in Islamic nations , converting from christianity to islam has no punishment. Don’t get more apartheid than that !!!!!!!! Homosexuality is punishable by death in islamic countries , but hetorosexuals have no punishment !!!!!! apartheid . Apostasy is punishable by death in islamic countries . ISlam _ = _ apartheid !!!!!!!

    • 回复: @Clyde
  94. Svigor 说:

    Sorry Phil, can’t blame everything on “the Lobby”.

    Jewish narcissism.

    Oh so you are jealous of jews being able to accomplish what white nationalists are too incompetent to accomplish . At least you admit to your jealousy . Kudos to you . Start having kids instead of constantly posting dissertations on the internet . Whites 1.1 kids per couple LMFAO !!!!!!!

    I’ve admitted I envy Jewry their ethnocentrism, more than once. I make no effort to deny it. Of course, Jews scream “anti-Semitism!!!” at this, because they’re the world’s biggest racists.

    The Jews of the Middle East would be suffering the same fate as the Christians except for one fact. They have their own nation and plenty of firepower.

    Try getting the Jews to say that. Israelis won’t lift a finger for right-wing movements anywhere but Israel. Because they’re Jewish Supremacists, not really right-wing.

    比如说,你要多关注涌入美国、加拿大和澳大利亚等国家的成群结队的中国人、印度人、黑人和穆斯林,而不是那里的少量犹太人。

    Say, how about you get a prominent Israeli to say that. Diaspora Jewry + Israeli Jewry = 100% in support of race-replacing European and European-American countries out of existence.

  95. @Beefcake the Mighty

    Islamic and Arabic societies have a lot of problems, no doubt, but they are essentially in the right in the conflict with Israel and the US.

    The right/wrong train left the station in the Middle East over a thousand years ago as far as I am concerned.

    显然, the concept of pure justice produces an infinite regression to absurdity. Centuries ago, wise men invented statutes of limitations to justify the rejection of such pure justice, in the interest of preventing continual disorder. The law zealously defends property rights, but only relatively recent property rights. Drawing a line after an arbitrary time has elapsed may be unjust, but the alternatives are worse.

    我们都是盗贼的后代, and the world’s resources are inequitably distributed. But we must begin the journey to tomorrow from the point where we are today. We cannot remake the past. – Garrett Hardin: Lifeboat Ethics

    • 回复: @Beefcake the Mighty
  96. marwan 说:

    如果满足以下条件,您可能是 WN 白人民族主义者:

    1 . 你认为黑人无法为他们的处境负责,但你把你所有的问题,实际上所有的世界问题都归咎于犹太人!

    2. 你想要一个白人家园,却嫉妒犹太人拥有一个犹太家园!!!

    3. You think the holocaust never happened , but simultaneously with hitler ” finished the job ” .

    4. You think jews control all the multibillion dollar media outlets , but think jews they can’t control 2 bit conspiracy websites !!!!!

    5. 您曾多次欣赏臭名昭著的芭芭拉幽灵 youtube 视频!!!

    6.你通常讨厌穆斯林,称他们为泥巴,称他们为暴力,鄙视他们的低智商,鄙视他们的K选择或任何你称之为字母选择的群体有更多的孩子并且因为白人太懒而惹恼你发生性关系和生育,但是如果他们在打架或杀害犹太人,那么你爱他们!!!!!!!

    7. You want to kick out all non whites from ” white countries ” . Still mad whites got kicked out of rhodesia !!!!!!!

    8. 你认为 1 名巴勒斯坦人被杀构成种族灭绝。 不考虑真正的种族灭绝,例如 2 万人被苏丹伊斯兰共和国杀害

    9. 你认为普京是白种人的救世主和以色列的潜在破坏者。 你无视普京的犹太血统,以及他几乎所有顾问都是犹太人的事实,自从他进入叙利亚冲突以来,以色列用精确导弹袭击刺杀了真主党和伊朗的顶级资产,如萨米尔昆塔尔,直接进入他卧室的窗户!!!!!! 并袭击大马士革机场附近的建筑物!!!!!! 雅认为他们可能会获得俄罗斯情报??????????

    • 回复: @Wally
    , @Svigor
  97. joe webb 说:
    @another fred

    If Israel did not exist, what would the Arab states be up to with regard to attacks on the West.

    乔·韦伯

  98. @Clyde

    ISIS is a CIA-Mossad mercenary army; it is no accident that all of those fake beheading videos come from a Mossad-connected site (Rita Katz). Like most of these Islamic terrorist groups that supposedly threaten the West and Israel, they primarily target Shiites and never strike Jewish targets.

    It is precisely those modern, Arabic regimes that Israel targets for dismemberment (the primary threat to Israel is demographic, not military; the Oded Yinon plan) where Christians and other religious minorities (as well as women) enjoy the greatest protection in the ME.

    I have to say I find amusing those who crow about Israel’s achievements; they exist parasitically off of the US and would not exist as a racialist state without active US support (quite contrary to US interests).

    • 回复: @Greasy WIlliam
    , @Clyde
  99. Anonymous • 免责声明 说:

    The worst is creating censorship of the internet. Pure scum, because this is what the founding father of the net, had already warned about years ago.

  100. DaveE 说:
    @Art

    They are an ethnic mafia, no offense to Sicilians or Italians intended. Nothing more, certainly nothing less. The oldest, most vicious, deranged and utterly diabolical ethnic mafia EVAH.

  101. Corvinus 说:
    @Oscar Peterson

    “Your post is utterly incoherent.”

    那是胡说八道。

    “Rather than engaging in vague and pointless whining, why don’t you identify specific posts that you oppose and argue against them?”

    There isn’t any “vague whining”. It’s simple–some people here have a Joo fixation. As in EVERY single political, economic, and social problem is attributed to that group without careful consideration of the machinations of their own group. The word is “projection”.

    • 回复: @Oscar Peterson
  102. Likud has managed to misrepresent its own extremist party policies as somehow identical to those of all persons either ethnically or religiously Jewish worldwide. In addition, it has conflated its own rump party domination of a narrow political coalition as identical to Israeli identity. This would be like an American political party’s elites claiming they are the only real Americans, as against the interests of everyone else.

  103. Corvinus 说:
    @alexander

    “Shouldn’t defrauding the American people be a one way ticket for any who advocate it to federal prison or Guantanamo Bay?”

    How do you define fraud? What are the means by which this make believe “Robin Hood” POTUS to put into motion your plan? How would this figure deal with groups of people who would label his actions as “fraudulent”?

    “Who has taught you fraud is okay?”

    YOU have, with your strawman, since I never directly or indirectly made that claim.

    • 回复: @alexander
  104. @Beefcake the Mighty

    It is precisely those modern, Arabic regimes that Israel targets for dismemberment

    Other than Syria, which ones do you mean?

    Iraq: has always sucked. Artificial country created by colonialism
    Egypt: sucked with Mubarak, who Israel supported, still sucks with Army that Israel supports
    Libya: sucked with Quadaffi, sucks without him

    The most modern Arab countries, Morocco and Tunisia, Israel has never done anything to harm.

    • 回复: @Beefcake the Mighty
  105. Wally 说: • 您的网站
    @Sherman

    Respect them for what? That’s the point.

    And don’t try the ‘Horst Wessel’ & the debunked 6,000,000 crap.

  106. Wally 说: • 您的网站
    @marwan

    Wow! Your strawman moment.

    You must be exhausted.

  107. helena 说:

    I just want to say to everyone who talks about ethnicity, and this is a point that may not be approved but is nevertheless true, the Jewish marriage system is capable of bringing in genes from outside via women and exporting genes outside via men – in England we are not allowed to talk about English ethnicity, even though it has been demonstrated to exist (POBI – Wellcome Trust). Many English people have a jewish ancestor, don’t identify as jewish but usually/always support immigration. I have Jewish-identifying relatives who are 75% genetically English. In other words, those English genes (including high IQ, calm and collected demeanor and north European features, are now lost to English ethnicity/gene pool).

    This is why it is so disappointing that HBD, which has done so much to explore cousin marriage and the church’s ban on cousin marriage, is silent about jewish marriage even though genetic surveys show that jewish genetics mostly sit between the host country and palestine.(Bihar et al, 2010 – see via Dienekes blog)

    • 回复: @This Is Our Home
  108. alexander 说:
    @Corvinus

    Are you actually asking me to define fraud for you …Corvinus ?

    Are you actually asking me to site “examples” of fraud, Corvinus ?..at this late date ?

    Do I really need to go through the litany of fraud that the lobby has used against the American people over the last fifteen years ?

    Do I need to do that ?

    Lets take one example…..how about the absolute uncontested certainty that it was Saddams anthrax which was sent to Senator Leahy’s and Tom Brokaws offices.

    Every owner of every major newspaper and media conglomerate who ran this story uncontested should be plopped in federal prison ASAP.
    Every member of the Office of Special Plans who generated this fraudulent story should be plopped there too,
    尽快。

    All their assets should be clawed back by the President to help pay down the national debt, ASAP.

    I don’t care about what you refer to as” Joos” …..I care about the fraud .

    I am so sick of people , like you Corvinus, who try to equivocate and relativize the massive… systemic…. heaving….. Lobby induced fraud that has been foisted on the american people on a daily basis over the last decade and a half….and that its cost us(in believing it) 13 trillion dollars of debt and the lives of countless innocent people.

    It is so disgusting that there has been zero accountability for any of it .

    I am amazed you are so truculent or ignorant to defend it.

    Truly amazed.

    Straw man ? please…what a joke.

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  109. Mr Giraldi, the reason that you are called an anti-semite is because it is pretty obvious that that is what you are. As we shall see:

    Charlie Hebdo frequently insults Muslims (and also Christians) but rarely lampoons Jews.

    There are 2 billion Christians and 2 billion Muslims and Giraldi just can not understand why Hebdo does not pay equal attention to 12 million Jews. Why can they not, Giraldi ‘reasons’, devote a hundred percent of their thought and opinion to Jews? Giraldi does. Giraldi is not obsessed. He knows that 12 million is more important than 2 billion.

    and I know what is coming…but Jews always talk about Jews are they not equally unbalanced?

    No. Jews talking about Jews are normal. Jains also talk a lot about Jains.

    Now it is true that we must recognise that Israel is no saint and we must also recognise that Jews often have ethnic pressure groups which pursue their ethnic self-interest. We must not forget however that these are normal things and dwarfed by the innumerable groups representing other foreign interests. (perhaps Giraldi is in one of these group’s pay?)

    So we can see that Hebdo’s coverage is proportionate. Giraldi’s is not. What gall then for him to criticise them by posing as the underdog who has found the moral high ground. It is Hebdo which truly speaks truth to power.

    Giraldi’s writings will never provoke masked men to storm his home and gun him down…

    I presume that Giraldi would happily give our countries away if only it would spite the Jews.

    • 回复: @utu
    , @Art
  110. @helena

    Helena seems authentic but is confused.

    the Jewish marriage system is capable of bringing in genes from outside via women and exporting genes outside via men

    Officially it should be the other way around. Jewish identity is supposed to be passed through the mother’s side. Nonetheless you make a good point. Nowadays Jews out-marry a lot.

    in England we are not allowed to talk about English ethnicity, even though it has been demonstrated to exist

    True, but I don’t see your point. This is not because of Jews, it is because we are idiots.

    I will make a point for you though. When a mostly English Jew grows into an identity the fact that we can’t speak about being English will discourage them from identifying as such. This is sad and shows a Saileresque ‘flight from white.’

    I also remember, as a child, many of my friends reflexively emphasising their mostly tenuous Welsh or Scots roots, probably for the same reasons.

    . In other words, those English genes (including high IQ, calm and collected demeanor and north European features, are now lost to English ethnicity/gene pool

    I understand what you are saying but I don’t think it is fair. Follow the next post.

    jewish marriage even though genetic surveys show that jewish genetics mostly sit between the host country and palestine

    Or rather, with all this outmarriage the English Jewish gene pool is being submerged into the actual English gene pool. At a ratio of 1 to something like 200, I think that this is basically irrelevant for the English although obviously quite relevant for English Jews.

    Furthermore, from an HBD perspective, this sprinkling of Ashkenazi genes is not without benefits. It is far too small to dilute the general identity and may add something small. I mean, were Jews to complete marrying in and the rest of the population to remain static then Ashkenazi genes would be 0.5 percent of the English gene pool. Is this really an issue?

    • 同意: Wizard of Oz
    • 回复: @Corvinus
    , @helena
  111. Anonymous • 免责声明 说:

    Israel did 9-11.

    American troops should be rolling into Tel Aviv & Herzliya, not Iraq and Afghanistan.

    But Israel wants its enemies to be America’s enemies.

    Israel wants Christian Americans to be killing its Muslim Neighbors.

  112. geokat62 说:

    这是一位以色列人写给他的以色列同胞的公开信。 它由居住在丹麦的以色列音乐家、指挥家和博主/作家乔纳森·奥菲尔 (Jonathan Ofir) 撰写。

    给我的以色列同胞的一封公开信:

    这可能是近十年来对我们历史的回顾性研究的高潮。 在某些时候,除了单一的故事、案例和论点之外,我觉得需要对我们的以色列“奇迹”、犹太复国主义“梦想”的体现进行一些明确且广泛的讨论。

    我不会用希伯来语写这篇文章,尽管这可能是最直接地传达你的思想的惯用工具。 我不会这样做,因为我已经受够了我们这些“自我理解”的以色列人回收的脏衣服。 虽然我写信给你,但遗憾的是,这些年来,我对来自我们以色列人的改变的希望已经下降——因此,如果不是更多的话,我也把赌注押在国际社会的参与上——我们需要他们的帮助糟糕——不是为了更多的现金、武器或道歉的“理解”,而是因为它干预了我们显然无法,而且大多不愿意解决的问题。 我因此在这里表现出的态度在以色列和犹太文化中是一种极不受欢迎的态度。 这是“moser”的血脉——那个向goyim“告密”反对“犹太民族”的人。

    好吧,克服它。 手头还有更严重的问题。

    我必须首先告诉你,我们对以色列历史的评估忽略了我们这边的太多暴行。 事实上,其中大部分内容仍然是机密——甚至可以追溯到 1948 年。是的,你可能听说过代尔亚辛大屠杀,它经常在教科书中讲授,但被描绘成一种失常,由“极端主义”、“流氓”派系实施在独立宣言之前(尽管那些极端派系的领导人成为了我们的总理)。 但是,我们在 1948 年,确实是以色列国防军所犯下的数十起其他屠杀呢? 你有没有读过 Al Dawayima,它显然比 Deir Yassin 更糟糕? Yair Auron 刚刚在 Haaretz 上写过它,我翻译并把它放在这里和我的 Facebook 页面上。 去读吧。 这是一封首次完整发布的信件,但它本身并不是什么秘密——它的摘录已经发布了几十年——还有许多其他证词和文件,供那些想要寻找和寻找的人使用。

    当你总结系统性的大规模处决时,许多轮奸案件(这些案件被发现的速度很慢,因为它们涉及两方面的耻辱),用棍棒压碎儿童的头骨,从母亲的胎儿身上扯下胎儿子宫——所有的,还有更多,由“我们”、“好人”、“文化精英”——通常在没有危险的情况下,只是出于纯粹的无端虐待和对“阿拉伯人”的仇恨——那么你可能开始意识到,以色列不是在一场生存战争,一场精英和先进文化在落后的阿拉伯亚文化的“坏邻居”中的战争。

    让我清楚直接地把它放在那里:

    我们一直表现得像动物一样,野蛮程度确实可以,应该,并且已经与我们喜欢憎恨的人——纳粹——相比,他们的残忍本应为我们开脱。 正如 Golda Meir 告诉 MK Shulamit Aloni 的那样:“大屠杀之后,犹太人可以做任何事情。” 不。 该死的不是。 从一开始,我们就用这个借口,用那些话或其他的话,并系统地掩盖我们自己的残忍行为。 并且因为我们在这方面基本上屈服于我们自己的宣传,我们没有看到历史痕迹,如果诚实地遵循,将告诉我们我们基本上和以前一样在同一个地方 - 仍然在征服,仍然在屠杀,仍然在折磨.

    这不是一连串事件强加给我们,作为试图“生存”的必然结果。 尽管如此,这是我们固有的国家宗教的可预测结果——这不是犹太教,正如许多人错误地认为的那样——而是犹太复国主义。

    我们被洗脑了,认为犹太复国主义是我们的救星。 当耶稣为基督徒死在十字架上时,我们的士兵也为我们的国家而死。 不——他们主要为犹太复国主义而死。 我们通常认为的“我们的国家”并不是真正的“我们的国家”。 这是许多其他人的国家,我们不仅以深不可测的残暴将他们驱逐,而且我们现在还把他们关在各种形式、形状和风格的笼子里,并在不同程度上处于可怕的种族隔离制度之下——为了保持我们神圣的“人口平衡”——同时我们继续,而且有增无减,在“应许之地”上扩张。

    我们的占领并非始于 1967 年,我们的残忍和罪行也并非始于 1982 年。 我们在别人的乱葬坑上建立了一个国家。 这不是强加给我们的。 正如贝京在 1967 年所说,关于 XNUMX 年的战争,“我们必须对自己诚实……我们决定进攻。” 因此,我们必须对自己诚实对待“自卫”的所有其他描述。 事实上,整个犹太复国主义的冒险本质上被描述为“为生存而斗争”,“为自卫而斗争”。

    如果我们没有把我们的罪行隐藏得如此之好、如此之深,并有如此多的宣传“威慑”言论,或许更容易相信我们的诚意。 另一方面,当这些罪行被揭露时,也无法为我们的道德正义辩护。 事实上,随着世界媒体变得更加透明,我们犯罪的现实变得无法隐藏——因此我们更加关注宣传——将其全部扭曲为“自卫”。 为了“自卫”,我们在加沙不分青红皂白地炮轰房屋和夷为平地。 我们折磨孩子,是为了“自卫”。

    让我们直截了当地说:我们折磨和恐吓巴勒斯坦人是为了威慑他们,让他们的生活变得如此悲惨,以便他们想要离开——或者报复,这将证明我们的下一次打击是合理的。

    我们创造了一个怪物。 如果这就是“生存”的样子,谁会想“生存”? 这种靠着“他人”的死亡和毁灭来维持自己的“生存”是多么卑鄙? 的确,那些“他人”是谁? 难道我们真的不是那些带着我们“更懂”文化来“让沙漠开花”的“其他人”吗? 随着这片沙漠随着另一个定居点、另一个虚构的“军事区”、另一个“扩张”而“绽放”——那里的人,“其他人”,逐渐被移除、包围或杀害。

    我们犹太人因此创造了一个持续几个世纪的暴力遗产,即使它现在停止。 如果现在揭露所有故事,解密所有档案(1948 年、1967 年和所有其他档案),可以肯定的是,这次犹太复国主义冒险将在世界历史的编年史中构成另一个令人震惊和实质性的野蛮和残酷篇章。

    但这还没有结束——更糟,但也更好。 我们现在有能力阻止它。 不,这并不意味着我们的毁灭,正如宣传犹太复国主义的歇斯底里主义者会条件反射地宣称的那样。 这是一个摆在我们面前的选择——放弃排他性的统治,将犹太人与国家分开,和平地生活,面对每个人和每个国家可能面临的所有挑战。
    但我们不是一个国家。 国家不是“人”。 国家是一种政权,是治理的范式。 一个国家可能属于它的公民——但“我们”和以色列都不是一个真正的国家。 因为以色列国是拥有犹太国籍的人的国家——这取代了他们的公民身份。 如果这意味着某种种族-宗教-民族混杂优势,我拒绝成为这个“我们”的一部分。 这是否一定意味着与犹太教离婚? 不,当然不是。 它只是意味着要与犹太复国主义在它自己和犹太教之间建立的表面上不可分割的联系分开,在垄断犹太教方面,对所有反对它的人使用黑手党式的胁迫,并(经常)应用终极修辞大规模杀伤性武器——“反...犹太主义”。

    这是一种需要打击的恐吓策略。 如果我们不超越这种意识形态使我们屈服的知识分子返祖现象,我们将继续以这种“宗教”的名义犯下严重的罪行并为之开脱。

    有未来。 尽管如此,犹太复国主义是一个死胡同。 我意识到今天说这些话与共识相去甚远,而且毫无疑问是社会排斥的秘诀。 我会接受的。 我已经下定决心了。 但这不是我所服从的预言性殉难。 这实际上是我看到的唯一正确的道路。 如果你希望与犹太复国主义有一个美好的未来,至少要做最少的事情来真正了解它对巴勒斯坦人意味着什么。 令人惊讶的是,这可能是更容易的部分。 更难的部分是直视恐惧,然后照照镜子,看看犹太复国主义对你做了什么。

    - 查看更多: http://mondoweiss.net/2016/02/to-my-fellow-israelis-we-can-stop-this/#sthash.rPxU6NE6.dpuf

  113. Anonymous • 免责声明 说:

    All you jew obsessed freaks here are fucking morons, how many nonwhites like chinese and indians have flooded into vancouver lately and all you fucking imbeciles talk about are jews.

    • 同意: Clyde
  114. @Corvinus

    You provide no empirical evidence to support your claims and imagine that by employing “Joo,” you have somehow fired a winning rhetorical shot. How ludicrous.

    In your original post you repeatedly used the word “your.” Were you referring to Giraldi?

    If so, what is it that he said specifically that you are complaining about?

    Do you disagree with the main points of Giraldi’s article?

    As I said, your piece is vague and incoherent whining. You don’t like what’s being said but can’t seem to marshal an argument against what you hear, so you resort to “Jooism” (i.e., the concoction of the epithet “Joo” in order to avoid having to advance a coherent and logical argument.)

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  115. @Corvinus

    “That’s not entirely accurate.”

    But mostly accurate. The media spends endless time on the alleged and fundamentally unproved nuclear weapons program of Iran but basically accepts Israel’s arsenal. Amusingly, Israel got its arsenal by the sort of connivance and theft that it and its lobby now accuse Iran of (without proof of course.)

    The media is happy to present the Israel lobby’s complaints about the Iranian ballistic missile program uncritically, but rarely if ever discusses Israel’s Jericho missile.

    Art’s point may not be ENTIRELY accurate, but it is fundamentally accurate.

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  116. @Greg Bacon

    Israel’s interest in the Golan Heights is obvious and it has a common border with Lebanon which could literally be moved to enlarge Israel. Otherwise your list of countries Israel wants a piece of doesn’t make sense and invites speculation about what you were smoking or whether perhaps your map is 2500 years old…

    • 回复: @Rehmat
  117. @Corvinus

    “I prefer humanity rather than a particular identity. Pro-race is code for anti-humanity.”

    Are YOU impotent to bring about your “pro-humanity” vision? And what do you do when different segments of humanity clash with one another?

    Do you favor the Eastern European Jewish conquest of Palestine and the gradual ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian people? How does your “pro-humanity” vision work in practice? What does it even mean?

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  118. utu 说:

    “Israel did 9-11” – too evil to expose!

  119. utu 说:
    @This Is Our Home

    Hebdo does not talk about Chinese either. It talks about Muslims because they are the enemy of Israel and they are made to be the enemy of the West which suppose to fight them for Israel. And Hebdo’s job is to vilify them so the fighting them will be easier.

  120. Corvinus 说:
    @alexander

    “how about the absolute uncontested certainty that it was Saddams anthrax which was sent to Senator Leahy’s and Tom Brokaws offices…Every owner of every major newspaper and media conglomerate who ran this story uncontested should be plopped in federal prison ASAP.
    Every member of the Office of Special Plans who generated this fraudulent story should be plopped there too, ASAP.”

    Now we are getting somewhere. In what specific ways was this story “fraudulent”? What facts are you able to present that these individuals should be hauled to jail for running this story? How are YOU able to make this sole determination that they are guilty compared to legal experts? What are your qualifications?

    You do realize that these outlets have constitutional protections, that those who ran the story cannot be merely put in jail, right? Do you even comprehend due process and the rule of law?

    “I am amazed you are so truculent or ignorant to defend it.”

    火车很好。

    • 回复: @geokat62
  121. Corvinus 说:
    @This Is Our Home

    “Or rather, with all this outmarriage the English Jewish gene pool is being submerged into the actual English gene pool.”

    Increasing numbers of people are not concerned with their “gene pool” is being “diluted”. Rather, they focus on marrying and procreating with someone they are compatible with. That’s called being a human being. Knock yourself out if you want to have your children remain “pure bred”.

    • 回复: @This Is Our Home
  122. Corvinus 说:
    @Art

    “You say your are not a Jew – why do you defend them – the tribe is destroying America, Europe, and the ME?”

    I could easily make the claim that non-Jews, specifically Caucasians…or Muslims…or Christians…hell, any group…are destroying American, Europe, and YOU.

    This fixation on Joos is truly fascinating to me. Now, what are YOU prepared to do about it? Are you that impotent not to hatch a plan, a course of action if you will, to thwart the dastardly deeds of Joos?

    • 回复: @Art
  123. Corvinus 说:
    @Oscar Peterson

    “Are YOU impotent to bring about your “pro-humanity” vision?”

    No, because I am virile in how I treat people on a case by case basis.

    “And what do you do when different segments of humanity clash with one another?”

    Try to bridge the gap between their differences. Alas, human beings are generally set in their ways and are prone to confirmation bias and projection.

    “Do you favor the Eastern European Jewish conquest of Palestine and the gradual ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian people?”

    Would you say the same thing if the Palestinian peoples were in charge and were removing Joos by force?

    The United Nations, under the auspices of Great Britain and the United States, was willing to partition Palestine through Jooish and Arab representation. The Arabs, understandably, boycotted these meetings. As a result, the state of Israel was born. In return, Joo leaders have in many instances bullied their way to create a situation where hostility runs deep between them and Arabs. Anti-humanity? Absolutely. How to solve this issue? Great question, considering this conflict is centuries old and embedded in religious and cultural traditions that neither side is willing to compromise.

    Do you favor pro-whites deeming those whites who choose to associate with non-whites as being race traitors?

    “How does your “pro-humanity” vision work in practice? What does it even mean?”

    The Golden Rule–treat each person with respect, and seek not to characterize the actions of one individual from a particular group based on every known stereotype. Alas, white, red, black, yellow, and Joo race baiters run rampant in today’s society.

    • 回复: @Oscar Peterson
  124. helena 说:
    @This Is Our Home

    Thanx for replying.

    “Helena … is confused.”

    Supposing a woman with a Jewish mother and Inuit father marries a man with a Navajo mother and a Sicilian father and decides to bring up her children as Jewish? What’s their ethnicity? It seems to depend on which ethnicity makes the greatest demand for membership? I don’t think they’d qualify for Navajo status if casino shares were involved. I could imagine the Sicilian relatives being quite accepting.

    “True, but I don’t see your point. ”

    The point was to depict a gene pool like a Venn diagram, to state the parameters of the biological point. It didn’t have to be English, it could have been Welsh and then it wouldn’t have needed qualifying since the Welsh, for now, still have their ethnicity in the public consciousness. MSM does not use English as an ethnic label so I felt I had to justify using it.

    “This is sad and shows a Saileresque ‘flight from white.’”

    I’m trying to say the opposite. If people who are genetically 75% English want to practice Judaism, by all means. But 75% English is not ‘Jewish’ in the sense that ‘Jewish’ is currently ‘defined’.

    “but I don’t think it is fair”

    It’s not about fairness but about what happens during sexual reproduction.

    “Or rather, with all this outmarriage the English Jewish gene pool is being submerged into the actual English gene pool. ”

    Jewish genes that end up outside the Jewish gene pool seem to create a cultural predilection for immigration. Not that I’m suggesting a direct deterministic link rather the awareness of having jewish ancestry.

    “Is this really an issue?”

    The only issue I’m raising is to be accurate about gene flow.

  125. Corvinus 说:
    @Oscar Peterson

    “The media spends endless time on the alleged and fundamentally unproved nuclear weapons program of Iran but basically accepts Israel’s arsenal.”

    What does “fundamentally unproven” even mean?

    “The media is happy to present the Israel lobby’s complaints about the Iranian ballistic missile program uncritically, but rarely if ever discusses Israel’s Jericho missile.”

    That’s not “fundamentally accurate”.

    http://investigations.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/02/28/10534518-fears-grow-of-israel-iran-missile-shootout

    http://www.businessinsider.com/israels-nuclear-arsenal-may-be-different-than-everyone-thinks-2014-11

    http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Middle-East/2010/0524/Did-Israel-offer-to-sell-South-Africa-nuclear-weapons

    “Amusingly, Israel got its arsenal by the sort of connivance and theft that it and its lobby now accuse Iran of (without proof of course.)”

    What evidence do you have that supports your assertion of this “connivance and theft”?

    • 回复: @Oscar Peterson
  126. @Corvinus

    Increasing numbers of people are not concerned with their “gene pool” is being “diluted”. Rather, they focus on marrying and procreating with someone they are compatible with. That’s called being a human being. Knock yourself out if you want to have your children remain “pure bred”.

    Wowzers! You missed my point. Go back and read what I wrote. ‘To a hammer everything is a nail…’

  127. Corvinus 说:
    @Oscar Peterson

    Yes, Joos have a lobby. Yes, Joos are tribal. Yes, Joos seek to look out for their interests. Just like any other group, like your lobby, your tribe, your interests. What, you don’t think your machinations are any different when it comes to destruction and mayhem and chaos?

    I also invoke Niwdog’s Law–As an online discussion continues with multiple posters, the likelihood of a person making assertions that the Jews are behind everything in the world that is “bad” exponentially grows.

    Criticize and lambaste Joos all you want. Knock yourself out.

    • 回复: @Oscar Peterson
  128. geokat62 说:
    @Corvinus

    Now we are getting somewhere. In what specific ways was this story “fraudulent”? What facts are you able to present that these individuals should be hauled to jail for running this story?

    Further to the two cases cited by alexander, another case in point is the NYT’s Judith Miller and her “stories” about Saddam’s possession of WMD? Had she published these stories in Canada, she’d be in jail:

    In 1985, Holocaust denier Ernst Zündel was charged with “spreading false news” by publishing a pamphlet entitled “Did Six Million Really Die?” in Canada, contrary to s. 181 of the Criminal Code.

    Section 181 states that “[e]very one who wilfully publishes a statement, tale or news that he knows is false and causes or is likely to cause injury or mischief to a public interest is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment”.

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  129. @Greasy WIlliam

    If you really are Hasbara, the Israelis should ask for their money back because you are doing a really poor job.

    • 回复: @RobinG
  130. dahoit 说:
    @Maj. Kong

    Zionist liars create antisemitism.Ding ding ding.Can I have my medal?

    • 回复: @Maj. Kong
  131. @alexander

    Unfortunately, no such candidate exist and probably won’t for awhile. Not Trump, and certainly not Sanders, who himself is a Kosher Jew. Being one of the few things I find objectionable about him.

  132. dahoit 说:
    @Jim Christian

    Only to wacko lunatic heretics is 5 billion chump change.
    Using the Lords name and religious precepts in vain is highly dubious,and a sign of a ziomonster,as they hate Him.

  133. Corvinus 说:
    @geokat62

    Zündel was found guilty, but exonerated in 1992 when the Supreme Court of Canada held that the law he was prosecuted under was a violation of the guarantee of freedom of expression under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

    “Further to the two cases cited by alexander…”

    [Sigh] In what specific ways were the stories “fraudulent”? What facts are you able to present that these individuals should be hauled to jail for running this story? How are YOU able to make this sole determination that they are guilty compared to legal experts? What are your qualifications?

    You do realize that American reporters have constitutional protections, that those who ran the story cannot be merely put in jail for their story, right? Do you even comprehend due process and the rule of law?

    • 回复: @geokat62
  134. geokat62 说:
    @Corvinus

    Do you even comprehend due process and the rule of law?

    Ok, Perry Mason. While there may not be laws on the books today to punish these people from deliberately propagating lies in major news publications that result in the deaths of untold innocent people and the loss of billions from the national treasury, what alexander and I are suggesting is that there should be – i.e., these people 应该 held accountable, even if they can’t be under present laws.

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  135. Max Payne 说:
    @marwan

    Those don’t even compare to the barbarity that Israel commits.

    真实的故事。

    • 回复: @marwan
  136. @Corvinus

    What does “fundamentally unproven” even mean?

    It means that no evidence to support the claim has been adduced. Do you want to provide some?

    Your selection of quotes refutes your own argument. Israel has had operational Jericho’s since the late 1980s. Yet what is required to generate the NBC article you cite from 2012 ? Iran, of course! See the double standard? The Business Insider article from 2014 is focused on minimizing the size of Israel’s nuclear program and arsenal. And the CSM article which you had to go all the way back to 2010 to find comes to no real conclusion on its subject.

    Now, compare that to the hundreds of articles, most of them accepting unproven or outright fallacious premises that have flooded the western media over the last decade on the subject of Iran’s alleged nuclear weapons program. The Israeli nuclear and missile programs have basically gotten a free ride in the western media. If you can’t see that, then you are not the “pro-humanity” neutral that you claim to be.

    What evidence do you have that supports your assertion of this “connivance and theft”?

    Do you really not know or are you just being deliberately obtuse?

    Why did Israel kidnap Mordecai Vanunu off the streets of Rome after he began to reveal aspects of the Israeli nuclear program?

    Here are a few basics from the Guardian, but the information is so widespread you can get it many places”:

    “The Israelis admitted to having a reactor but insisted it was for entirely peaceful purposes. The spent fuel was sent to France for reprocessing, they claimed, even providing film footage of it being supposedly being loaded onto French freighters. Throughout the 60s it flatly denied the existence of the underground reprocessing plant in Dimona that was churning out plutonium for bombs.

    Israel refused to countenance visits by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), so in the early 1960s President Kennedy demanded they accept American inspectors. US physicists were dispatched to Dimona but were given the run-around from the start. Visits were never twice-yearly as had been agreed with Kennedy and were subject to repeated postponements. The US physicists sent to Dimona were not allowed to bring their own equipment or collect samples. The lead American inspector, Floyd Culler, an expert on plutonium extraction, noted in his reports that there were newly plastered and painted walls in one of the buildings. It turned out that before each American visit, the Israelis had built false walls around the row of lifts that descended six levels to the subterranean reprocessing plant.”

    http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jan/15/truth-israels-secret-nuclear-arsenal

    Do you need more or can you find it yourself?

    • 同意: Orville H. Larson
    • 回复: @NoseytheDuke
  137. @Corvinus

    “Do you favor the Eastern European Jewish conquest of Palestine and the gradual ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian people?”

    You never actually answered this question of mine.

    “The Arabs, understandably, boycotted these meetings.”

    So if that boycott was “understandable,” then is their subsequent and current resistance “understandable” as well?

    “Do you favor pro-whites deeming those whites who choose to associate with non-whites as being race traitors?”

    No. Is that question meant to be relevant?

    OK, I got it. You’re going to hang out on Mount Olympus pontificating about the Golden Rule, and you have no real intellectual framework for dealing with the inevitable conflicts among human groups other than pallid homiletics.

    Do you think that the US relationship with Israel benefits the US strategically? Or do you not do strategy? It’s much easier to sermonize about “Joos” and the cruel baiting to which they are being mercilessly subjected, isn’t it?

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  138. @Corvinus

    “Yes, Joos have a lobby. Yes, Joos are tribal. Yes, Joos seek to look out for their interests. Just like any other group, like your lobby, your tribe, your interests.”

    So then, in the context of what you have just said, what does “Joo baiting,” a phrase you have employed several times, really mean? You concede that Jewry is pursuing collective goals, which necessarily must come at the expense of other, competing groups. So why would a critique of that pursuit by those who do not benefit from it be nothing more than “baiting?” Your basic approach to the issue makes little sense.

    It would be one thing if you had a specific argument to make against something that someone in this string has asserted. But you really don’t. It’s all just a generalized complaint about how unfair everyone is being. Quite nonsensical really. And then to resort to the ultimate straw man–“assertions that the Jews are behind everything in the world.” No one in this string has said that. Again, you should focus less on what you imagine that unspecified people are asserting and more on the specific arguments being made with which you disagree.

    That way, you might be able to relieve yourself of the psychological dependence you seem to have on “Joos.”

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  139. @geokat62

    With an eye-for-an-eye moral law, there can be no accountability, equivalency or judgement until six or twelve millions of gentiles first perish in recompense. There is a long way to go yet.

    • 回复: @geokat62
    , @annamaria
  140. RobinG 说:
    @Beefcake the Mighty

    Remarkable how the hasbara of every stripe have flocked here so quickly! Did Phil really hit such a nerve? Or do they fear he’s part of a turning tide? There’s just a whiff of desperation in the air.

    • 回复: @DaveE
  141. @anonymous

    One thing which no one ever says out loud, and perhaps the main reason why the Tribe has such pull in the US.

    Ever hear of The Texas School book Depository? How about Deeley Plaza,
    Grassy Knoll …anyone ?

    Just a casual look at history and the issues President Kennedy was dealing with at the time , vis a vis Israel. It’s at least plausible.

  142. Corvinus 说:
    @geokat62

    “punish these people from deliberately propagating lies…”

    For the love of God, in what specific ways were the stories “fraudulent”? What facts are you able to present that these individuals should be hauled to jail for running this story? How are YOU able to make this sole determination that they are guilty compared to legal experts? What are your qualifications?

    更好的是,人们如何制定一项法律,将记者或新闻机构,甚至普通公民的谎言定为刑事犯罪?

    Are you willing to live in a society where the distinct possibility exists that YOU could be thrown in jail for “deliberately propagating lies”?

    Stating your accusation over and over again does equate to “evidence”. Please answer the questions.

  143. annamaria 说:
    @geokat62

    Finally, the truth has been uttered with an utmost clarity: “…the State of Israel is the state of those who hold Jewish Nationality – which supersedes their citizenship.”
    Another great point to stick to the aggressively vigilant ADL and Jewish Defense League: “As Golda Meir told MK Shulamit Aloni: “After the Holocaust, Jews are allowed to do anything.” And boy, they did allow themselves to do anything.
    And here is the root of all evil: “… our inherent state-religion – which is not Judaism, as many mistakenly think – but rather Zionism.” The noble tradition of Judaism has been sacrificed for the obnoxious and murderous ethnocentrism (of the “chosen” variety).

  144. Corvinus 说:
    @Oscar Peterson

    “Here are a few basics from the Guardian, but the information is so widespread you can get it many places.”

    Israel was part and parcel to the American plans to thwart communism at every turn during the Cold War. It is not surprising that Israel received nuclear technical support and a free pass to use that technology against their sworn enemy, Islam. Whether or not America should or should not continue that relationship is predicated upon one’s tribe. I prefer to be human and not necessarily align myself to Joo or anti-Joo intentions. I will leave that up to the race baiters.

    “The Israeli nuclear and missile programs have basically gotten a free ride in the western media.”

    Everyone knows about Israel’s intentions. There is no secret there. It’s about teams. Israel, despite their petulance, is on the American side. Iran is on the other side, the “evil” side. Within this international drama, there are anti-humanity undertones throughout.

    “Why did Israel kidnap Mordecai Vanunu off the streets of Rome after he began to reveal aspects of the Israeli nuclear program?”

    That’s a complicated matter, an entire thread can be devoted to the circumstances surrounding this event.

    “Is that question meant to be relevant?”

    Yes, as there a number of posters on this fine blog that focus on “whites” who are in favor of Joos as being “anti-white”.

    “Do you favor the Eastern European Jewish conquest of Palestine and the gradual ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian people?”

    I responded to the question in the way I can only answer it—Yes, Joos have a lobby. Yes, Joos are tribal. Yes, Joos seek to look out for their interests. Just like any other group, like your lobby, your tribe, your interests. What, you don’t think your machinations are any different when it comes to destruction and mayhem and chaos?

    “Conquest”? “Ethnic cleansing”? I’m not sure about that.

    “So if that boycott was “understandable,” then is their subsequent and current resistance “understandable” as well?”

    当然。

    “you have no real intellectual framework for dealing with the inevitable conflicts among human groups other than pallid homiletics.”

    I have a framework—treat others the way you want to be treated. When talking about complicated matters that have layers of nuance and centuries of hatred behind it, that framework unfortunately becomes untenable. What is lost are the messages of humanity in the Torah and in the Koran.

    “Do you think that the US relationship with Israel benefits the US strategically?”

    In the end, nations have interests, not allies. The American relationship with Israel is strategic. Whether one person believes it is beneficial or detrimental squarely depends on how a person feels about one’s tribe.

    • 回复: @SolontoCroesus
  145. Corvinus 说:
    @Oscar Peterson

    “Quite nonsensical really. And then to resort to the ultimate straw man–”assertions that the Jews are behind everything in the world.” No one in this string has said that.”

    That’s not “fundamentally accurate”.

    “Those don’t even compare to the barbarity that Israel commits.”

    “The noble tradition of Judaism has been sacrificed for the obnoxious and murderous ethnocentrism (of the “chosen” variety).”

    “what does “Joo baiting,” a phrase you have employed several times, really mean?”

    Should Israel be criticized for their policies? Absolutely. Is it anti-semitism to engage in such criticism? No. Do some people mischaracterize at least and outright lie at worst about Joos? Yes. One need only look at the above references. Perhaps people ought to look inwardly at their own tribal issues rather than attribute their own issues squarely upon other tribes.

    “That way, you might be able to relieve yourself of the psychological dependence you seem to have on “Joos.”

    
I am not the one talking about “Zionist conspiracies” and how the federal government is in the “pocket of Israel”.

  146. annamaria 说:
    @Fran Macadam

    “…here can be no accountability, equivalency or judgement until six or twelve millions of gentiles first perish in recompense.”
    How many Jews are preferring to live outside Israel currently? And how many of these “outsiders” have their hearts and minds shaped by the culture they grew up in – instead of being nurtured by the visceral hatred for the gentiles?
    Take a story of the Bolshevik Revolution and first Soviet Government that can be justifiably called the Government of Terrorists. Look at the ethnic composition of this Government. Next look at the presence of Jews among the bosses and middle-range officers in the Soviet secret police. If you decide to take and effort to look at the data, you would find that the disproportionate number of bosses in the first Soviet government and secret police were Jews. This discovery (of a rather well-known fact) would help you to comprehend why a documentary book, “Two Hundred Years Together,” written by the Nobel Prize winner A. Solzhenitsyn, was refused to be published in English translation by 所有 American and UK publishing houses. The documentary, “Two Hundred Years Together,” presents the facts on the role of Jews in the bloody Russian revolution; these facts are intolerable for the Holocaust biz. Considering the number of Russian victims and the epic ruin suffered by Russian civilization as a result of the Bolshevik Revolution, how many Jews should be held for “accountability, equivalency or judgement” in relation to the genocidal crimes that had been committed not only against ethnic Russians but against Ukrainians, Belorussians, Asians, Caucasians, and other people that had been living in the Russian empire?
    Meanwhile, the growing antipathy towards Israel has its causes in he following: “…the State of Israel is the state of those who hold Jewish Nationality – which supersedes their citizenship.” In short, it is OK for Israel (and the dreaming zionists) to feast parasitically on the resources of western civilization.
    Yours was a grandiose pronouncement on “accountability, equivalency or judgement until…” and so forth, which, as you can see, cannot withstand the force of facts.

  147. Clyde 说:
    @Beefcake the Mighty

    Maybe you are Muslim maybe you are Christian. But Muslims like you are the reason Israel is armed to the hilt, nukes and all. Muslims jihadists have the same Zionist conspiracy hallucinations as you. Party on Muhammad, just remember, you mess with the bull (Israel) and you will get the horns. Can ya blame them? The Israelis know that in the Middle East only the paranoid survive.

    • 回复: @Carroll Price
  148. marwan 说:
    @Max Payne

    palestinians killed by israel 1967 to present . 25,000

    papuans killed by indonesia 1963 to present . 500,000

    tibetans killed by china 1940s to present .200,000

    • 回复: @geokat62
    , @Art
    , @annamaria
  149. In some places the key media and political players who are engaged in the process can simply be bought.

    It amuses and saddens me when I see someone write this, as it indicates that the writer thinks that ‘key media and political players’ are unblemished until someone nefarious turns up and suborns them.

    That’s so far from a sensible premise that it amounts to a Flat Earth view of politics. It assumes that Acton’s aphorism (‘power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely’) was not a masterful piece of misdirection (I say ‘misdirection’ because it gets the situation precisely backwards: power attracts the already corrupt).

    If I was the head of a foreign clandestine service (or any organisation that relied on the corruption of politicians or bureaucrats), the 最后 thing I would do is wait until people got to political office before suborning them. I would have my people scouring university campuses and trade union movements for political aspirants, and luring them into compromising themselves by setting up situations in which they would advance only so long as they crossed a moral line that can subsequently be used against them.

    Political aspirants are among the most easily-identifiable subgroups of any student body: Blair, Cameron, Rudd, Gillard, Hawke, Brown, Obama, Clinton… all were student-political-aspirants (and many of them were actual student politicians).

    Given that the desire for political power (and power more generally) derives from an already-degenerate psychotype, identifying those who are willing to cross any line – even as a university student-politician – would be straightforward, and once identified, only those who were suborned would subsequently be ‘favoured’ by the next layer of the onion (which is made up of the previous generations of suborned power-seekers).

    From there, it’s easy: the would-be politician knows from that day forward that if he (or she) strays from the line, the photos of the ‘surprise packet’ are released.

    As a former elite student (albeit one with absolutely zero political interest – I have been an anarchist since I was an undergraduate), I was aware of several approaches by individuals who clearly had an agenda. Other students of my acquaintance – some of whom were obvious political aspirants – experienced the same thing.

    It could be the old-fashioned honey-trap (or ‘honeypot, if you prefer): invite the individual to a series of parties that devolve to progressively deeper levels of depravity – and rely on the willingness of political aspirants to ‘go along to get along’… next thing you know, you’ve got footage of them having sex with a child or a trannie (impulse controls weakens significantly when the target is drunk and stoned).

    Philby, Burgess, McLean and Blunt were honeypotted by the KGB back when homosexuality was a career-ender (in fact it was illegal and they faced jail time).

    Hence my assertion that paedophilia rings are actually controlled by intelligence services: they exist first and foremost to compromise aspiring politicians and senior bureaucrats (who, while degenerate, are not actually paedophiles but are prepared to cross that line if it gets them into the next layer of the onion), the better to enable them to be fully dependent on the good graces of those who entrap them.

    And of course if the target refuses to be drawn into a compromising situation, their political career ends right there – without them even knowing that it’s dead in the water… because in politics (and the senior levels of the bureaucracy), unless you get preferment from an important clique within one or other political party, you have no future.

    • 回复: @geokat62
  150. Maj. Kong 说:
    @dahoit

    Sure, a large part of the root causes of Anti-Semitism is Jewish double standards. I’m not the Unz resident neocon, just look at the rest of my posting history.

  151. Druid 说:
    @marwan

    You’re one of the volunteers referred to above with your fake Arab name to counter with your Hasbara bs

    • 回复: @marwan
  152. @Corvinus

    Israel was part and parcel to the American plans to thwart communism at every turn during the Cold War.

    That’s what confuses me about communism.

    In 1918-1919 Woodrow Wilson deployed US soldiers beefed up by Japanese forces in a bid to “destroy Bolshevism.” It failed; backfired, in fact.

    In 1932-1933 Stalin and the Bolsheviks killed 7- or 8-million Ukrainians, Russian peasants, kulaks (according to Martin Amis and Susan Liebman Butler).

    One of the first things Franklin Delano Roosevelt did in 1933 was to secretly dispatch Henry Morgenthau Jr. to negotiate with Litvinenko to grant diplomatic recognition to Stalin’s Russia and to arrange for the recompense for American property lost in the 1917 revolutions. Bolshevism was no longer a scourge; it wasn’t a problem any more.

    That was just the beginning of Franklin Roosevelt’s courting of Stalin (according to Susan Butler). The president and his Sec’y of the Treasury, Morgenthau, went out of their way to generate and gather up US taxpayer money and send it to Stalin.

    This is all well before 1942, when the first evidence of the alleged holocaust was published by Rabbi Stephen Wise.

    FDR & Morgenthau began gearing up to support Stalin and destroy Germany even before 1938 and the Munich Agreement.

    And speaking of 1938 — it was in that year that Herbert Hoover met with Hitler and concluded that Hitler’s three idees修复 were to unify Germany from its fragmentation post Versailles; to expand German access to resources; and “to destroy the Russian Communist government.” (Freedom Betrayed, p. 60 )

    Just a few hours ago someone posted this comment on a rigorously moderated blog:

    How true about the early 1930s street battles between the communists and the Brown Shirts of the Nazi SA (Sturm Abteilung) under Ernst Rohm.

    And most people think of the East Front as strictly a battle between Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union. In reality Germany was leading a “Great European Anticommunist Crusade” against the Soviet Union. In addition to the Wehrmacht, in Russia in 1942 there were 2 Romanian armies, 1 Hungarian and 1 Italian army, the Finnish army, the Spanish “Blue” division at Leningrad, and several Slovak units. The SS fielded a plethora of such units: the French “Charlemagne” division, the Scandinavian “Nord” division, and the Flemish “Dirlewanger” brigade, among others. Many anticommunist Soviet peoples joined the crusade as the campaign progressed, most notably the Cossacks and some Caucasian moslems. Beside the “Vlasov Army” of former Russian soldiers, tens of thousands of such men served as individual volunteers in Wehrmacht divisions as “HiWis” (hilfswillige = ‘willing helpers’). http://turcopolier.typepad.com/sic_semper_tyrannis/2016/02/if-this-were-the-us-and-not-russia.html#comment-6a00d8341c72e153ef01b7c8139de0970b

    So what we have is
    the USA (W. Wilson);
    Adolf Hitler;
    Romanians,
    匈牙利人,
    意大利人,
    the Finns,
    Spanirds,
    Slovaks,
    the French,
    Scandinavians,
    and even other Russians
    all committed to destroying Communism, just like Corvinus asserts the US delegated Israel to do.

    Fancy that: Hitler and Israel, on the same side.

    But Franklin Delano Roosevelt made friends with Stalin.
    Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Henry Morgenthau funneled money and weapons– lots of both — to Stalin.
    Henry Morgenthau’s right-hand man, Harry Dexter White, was employed by Moscow to spy on USA.

    How do you explain that, Corvinus?

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  153. geokat62 说:
    @Corvinus

    For the love of God, in what specific ways were the stories “fraudulent”? What facts are you able to present that these individuals should be hauled to jail for running this story? How are YOU able to make this sole determination that they are guilty compared to legal experts? What are your qualifications?

    One need not be a legal expert to realize when one is being lied to. Are you truly suggesting Judy Miller wasn’t lying in her reporting? Here’s just one reference:

    Lies Judith Miller Told Us

    And no one squawked louder than the New York Times’ Miller. As a former CIA analyst told Salon’s James C. Moore: “The White House had a perfect deal with Miller. [U.S.-funded Iraqi dissident Ahmed] Chalabi is providing the Bush people with the information they need to support their political objectives with Iraq, and he is supplying the same material to Judy Miller. Chalabi tips her on something and then she goes to the White House, which has already heard the same thing from Chalabi, and she gets it corroborated by some insider she always describes as a ‘senior administration official.’ “

    For example, on September 8, 2002, Miller reported on the front page of the Times that intercepted aluminum tubes indicated that Saddam was developing a nuclear bomb. That day, Colin Powell, Condoleezza Rice and Dick Cheney all appeared on Sunday morning talk shows, citing Miller’s sensational exposé, which was debunked, with much less fanfare, five days later.

    On May 26, 2004, Times Executive Editor Bill Keller explained that an internal audit “found a number of instances of coverage that was not as rigorous as it should have been.” He cited six faulty stories about the threat posed by Iraq, all but one of which was written or co-written by Miller, who was not mentioned by name.

    Miller has not been hesitant to voice her belief that Saddam posed a threat. She told Moore, “I understood that these people … who hated us so much … that if they ever got their hands on WMD, they would use them. Do I have a belief that the WMD exist, and a fear? Yeah, I have a real fear for my country.”

    http://inthesetimes.com/article/2362

    Now, as we all know, everyone (even journalists) has their biases. Here’s a previous comment I posted that sheds a little light on some of Judy’s:

    有点过时了,但你的帖子让我想起了 Scooter Libby 和他给 Judy Miller 的情书,其中他使用代码语言来指代阿斯彭转弯处的杨树丛。

    当时我没有意识到,但 Libby 和 Miller 都是 Aspen Study Group 或 ASG 的成员。

    对于那些不知道的人,ASG 于 2003 年夏天在科罗拉多州的阿斯彭召开了一次研讨会,讨论美国在中东的大战略。

    我已经开始阅读该研讨会的会议记录,但我想我会将这份文件分享给任何想了解更多细节的人。 以下是引言中的几句话:

    现在,美国开始了重塑中东的雄心勃勃的使命。

    The United States has long maintained several core (though competing) interests in the Middle East, including the stability of world oil markets and uninterrupted flow of petroleum from the region, the manifest importance of Israeli security, and support for moderate Arab regimes.

    http://www.aspeninstitute.org/sites/default/files/content/docs/asg/ASPEN_GRANDSTRATEGY1.PDF

    I also have taken to heart Cynthia McKinney’s admonition to “know who’s who in the zoo.” To that end, here is a little info on Judy’s bio, which may help explain which country she was referring to when she said “Yeah, I have a real fear for my country”:

    Born in New York City to a Jewish father and an Irish Catholic mother, Judith Miller grew up in Miami and Los Angeles, where she graduated from Hollywood High School. Her father, Bill Miller, was the owner of a night club in New Jersey and later in Las Vegas…

    In 1971, while at Princeton, Miller traveled to Jerusalem to research a paper. She became fascinated with the Israeli-Palestinian dispute, and spent the rest of the summer traveling for the first time to Egypt, Jordan, and Lebanon. In 1993, she married Jason Epstein, an editor and publisher.
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judith_Miller

    And, finally, with regard to your comment:

    Are you willing to live in a society where the distinct possibility exists that YOU could be thrown in jail for “deliberately propagating lies”?

    I kind of look at it this way. Are there not laws currently on the books that throw people in jail if they scream “fire” in a crowded movie theatre? Well, Judy was screaming “WMD” and the consequences of her doing so were exponentially more devastating than someone screaming “fire.” So if we have a law to protect a few movie goers, shouldn’t we have a law that protects against the wholesale slaughter of hundreds of thousands, if not a million, people?

    • 回复: @utu
    , @Corvinus
  154. Art 说:
    @This Is Our Home

    No. Jews talking about Jews are normal. Jains also talk a lot about Jains.

    Yes, agree 100% – Jew conspiring with our Jews against their Gentile neighbors is normal,

    You are trying to put lipstick on a pig!

    You protest to loudly – the truth is self-evident.

    Israel is the face of the Jew – and it is nothing short of evil.

  155. Rehmat 说:
    @Wizard of Oz

    I don’t know what Greg Bacon was smoking but I’m sure you’re suffering from Tay-Sachs.

    Historically the Golan Heights belongs to Lebanon but that criminal Herzl knew the importance of water sources to let Europe’s unwanted Jews to “bloom the Desert” where 750,000 Palestinians were already living for centuries.

    Lebanon appeared on Zionist Jewish hit list in 1919, when the World Zionist Congress delegation at the Paris Peace Conference said the Lebanese Litani River, Golan Heights and Jordan Valley (West Bank), were “essential for the necessary economic foundation of the new state for Jews. It must have the control of Arab rivers and headwaters.”

    As result of its 1967 aggression, Israel gained control of waters of the West Bank and the Sea of Galilee – but not the Litani River. The West Bank’s mountain aquifer and Sea of Galilee provides 60% of Israel’s freshwater needs – over one billion cubic meters per year.

    After WWI, Syria (al-Sham) became French colony and Palestine, Trans-Jordan, and Iraq British colonies. French divided al-Sham on religion basis; Lebanon for Christians and Syria for Muslims. In 1940, British colonists traded the Golan Heights to the French in exchange for territory in present day Jordan (here). Both occupied Golan Heights and Shebaa Farms are great source of water supplies to the illegal Jewish settlers.

    https://rehmat1.com/2015/10/10/israels-biggest-prize-would-be-lebanon/

    • 回复: @Wizard of Oz
  156. marwan 说:
    @Druid

    is your real name druid ?
    bs ??
    i posted un statistics of casualties in various ongoing conflicts . sorry if you dont like facts or truth . feel free to carry on your taqqiyah and kitman attempts !!!

  157. geokat62 说:
    @marwan

    palestinians killed by israel 1967 to present . 25,000

    I had to go way back in my archive of comments, but I managed to dig this one up:

    在回答 Lilienthal 的问题以色列的代价是什么时,我对犹太复国主义国家(以及大多数其他国家)迄今为止为确保“丛林中的别墅”的安全所付出的代价进行了一些计算。

    我的出发点是 67 年 XNUMX 月的战争,在这场战争中,以色列占领了约旦河西岸(包括东耶路撒冷)和加沙地带等其他土地,并违反国际法,立即开始将“事实摆在眼前”。

    尽管以色列于 2005 年正式“脱离”加沙,但实际上占领巴勒斯坦领土已经持续了近半个世纪。 以色列没有奉行“土地换和平”政策,而是决定彻底决裂(1996 年由理查德·佩尔领导的一个研究小组提交给比比·内塔尼亚胡的政策文件,后来被 GWB 采纳为美国外交政策的基础)在 9/11 之后的 ME),而是一直奉行“以和平换和平”的政策(你还记得康迪赖斯在 2006 年以色列袭击黎巴嫩时臭名昭著地描述了这一政策......我”

    1. 1982年黎巴嫩战争(1982-1985)

    • 被杀害的以色列人:IDF 657,平民 10
    • 黎巴嫩、巴勒斯坦和叙利亚人丧生:17,285(压倒多数平民)

    2. 第一次起义(1987-1993)

    • 被杀害的以色列人:IDF 60,平民 100
    • 巴勒斯坦人被杀:2,162(压倒多数平民)

    3. 联合国对伊拉​​克的制裁(1990-2003)

    崔伯诺? 1991 年,Paul H. Lewis 在《纽约时报》上写道:
    “自从 6 月 XNUMX 日对科威特实施贸易禁运以来,美国一直反对任何过早的放松,因为他们认为通过让伊拉克人民的生活变得不舒服,最终会鼓励他们罢免萨达姆·侯赛因总统。来自权力。”
    还应该指出的是,萨达姆正在为巴勒斯坦自杀式炸弹袭击者的家人提供 25,000 美元的担保。 在 27-1990 年的第一次海湾战争期间,他还向以色列投下了 91 枚飞毛腿导弹。

    “我认为这是一个非常艰难的选择,但价格——我们认为这个价格是值得的。” 美国驻联合国大使玛德琳·奥尔布赖特(真名玛丽·贾娜·科贝尔)在回答莱斯利·斯塔尔的问题时说:“我们听说有 XNUMX 万儿童死亡。 我的意思是,这比在广岛死的孩子还多。 而且,你知道,这个价格值得吗?”

    • 500,000 名伊拉克儿童被杀

    4. 防御之盾行动 (2002)

    • 以色列人被杀:IDF 30
    • 巴勒斯坦人被杀:497(压倒多数平民)

    5.伊拉克战争(2003-2012)
    崔伯诺? 米尔斯海默和沃尔特在他们的著作《以色列游说团和美国外交政策》的第 8 章中提供了确凿的证据,证明游说团推动伊拉克战争以加强以色列的安全:

    以色列对战争的热情最终导致其在美国的一些盟友告诫以色列官员减轻鹰派言论,以免战争看起来像是为以色列而战。 例如,在2002年秋天,一群称为“以色列计划”的美国政治顾问向美国的主要以色列人和亲以色列领导人散发了六页的备忘录。 该备忘录的标题为“谈论伊拉克”,旨在作为有关战争的公开声明的指南。 “如果您的目标是改变政权,那么由于潜在的抵制,您必须更加谨慎地使用自己的语言。 您不希望美国人相信对伊拉克的战争是为了保护以色列而不是为了保护美国。” http://mailstar.net/iraq-war.html

    重要的是要记住,撤除萨达姆是以色列“割草”运动和入侵黎巴嫩的先决条件,该运动是在萨达姆被罢免后不久开始的。

    • 伊拉克人的死亡人数:500,000(压倒多数平民)
    • 美国士兵阵亡:4,500

    6. 第二次黎巴嫩战争 (2006)

    • 被杀害的以色列人:IDF 121,平民 43
    • 黎巴嫩公民:~1,200

    7. 夏雨行动 (2006)

    • 以色列人被杀:IDF 7
    • 巴勒斯坦人被杀:402(不到一半平民)

    8. 铸铅行动(2008-2009)

    • 被杀害的以色列人:IDF 10,平民 3
    • 巴勒斯坦人被杀:武装分子 ~700,平民 ~700

    9. 防御之柱行动 (2012)

    • 被杀害的以色列人:IDF 2,平民 4
    • 巴勒斯坦人被杀:武装分子 ~100,平民 ~100

    10. 保护边缘行动 (2014)

    • 被杀害的以色列人:IDF 65,平民 6
    • 巴勒斯坦人被杀:约 2,100(压倒多数平民)

    11. 利比亚内战 (2011)
    崔波诺?
    “引述以色列政府高级官员的话说,‘以色列没有理由为卡扎菲的死而感到遗憾’,因为穆阿迈尔·卡扎菲‘支持恐怖活动,并鼓吹对全世界的以色列人实施恐怖活动。’”
    “卡扎菲是“黑色九月运动”的主要资助者,该运动在 1972 年夏季奥运会上犯下了慕尼黑大屠杀,……”
    “卡扎菲也成为巴勒斯坦解放组织的坚定支持者,该组织最终在 1979 年埃及寻求与以色列达成和平协议时损害了利比亚与埃及的关系。”
    • 死亡人数:2,500-25,000(压倒多数平民)

    12. 叙利亚内战(2011-?)

    崔波诺?
    “《纽约时报》记者乔迪·鲁多伦报道说:‘更安静的是,以色列人越来越多地争辩说,叙利亚两年半内战的最好结果,至少在目前,是没有结果。 '而以色列前驻纽约总领事阿隆·平卡斯告诉鲁多伦:'让他们俩都流血,流血致死:这就是这里的战略思想。 只要这种情况持续存在,叙利亚就没有真正的威胁。'”
    • 死亡人数:191,000(压倒多数平民)

    迄今为止的统计:

    • 以色列人杀死 1,108 人
    • 阿拉伯人杀害了约 1,200,000 人

    这是超过 1,200 : 1 的比率!

    • 回复: @marwan
  158. utu 说:
    @geokat62

    Good that you brought back that Judith Miller form the memory hole.

  159. Art 说:
    @marwan

    palestinians killed by israel 1967 to present . 25,000

    papuans killed by indonesia 1963 to present . 500,000

    tibetans killed by china 1940s to present .200,000

    Again those countries are not Western countries.

    Israel is not a Western country either – it is a Jew country – ask them.

    One wrong NEVER justifies another wrong. A valid Western ideal.

  160. DaveE 说:
    @RobinG

    Absolutely! These diabolical creatures are panicking more than I’ve ever seen. Everywhere you look, too, not just here.

    Karma is coming due FAST and they know it and it terrifies them, as rightly it should. They can’t even imagine the Hell that awaits them.

    Soon “The Chosen Ones” will be nothing but a very, very bad memory and there will be peace in the (goyim) world.

  161. Corvinus 说:
    @SolontoCroesus

    “Bolshevism was no longer a scourge; it wasn’t a problem any more.”

    FDR was astute in his decision to secure diplomatic relations with the U.S.S.R. to settle debts owed by Russia to America and to secure the legal status of Americans living there. Official policy against communism was not null and void as a result of this foreign affairs decision.

    “This is all well before 1942, when the first evidence of the alleged holocaust was published by Rabbi Stephen Wise.”
    
Holocaust denier, huh. Oh, brother.

    “But Franklin Delano Roosevelt made friends with Stalin. Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Henry Morgenthau funneled money and weapons– lots of both — to Stalin. Henry Morgenthau’s right-hand man, Harry Dexter White, was employed by Moscow to spy on USA.”

    How do you explain that, Corvinus?”

    The same way that the Reagan courted members of the Iranian government after the hostage situation to sell weapons to Israel and use that cash to fund Nicaraguan freedom fighters, while simultaneously funding Saddam Hussein in his Jihad against his bitter rival; the same way that Chinese nationalists and communists worked sided by side during World War II to defeat the Japanese, then proceeded to slaughter one another in a bitter civil war, resulting in a communist victory. Nations have interests, not allies. If it suits their interests at a particular moment in time, regardless of ideological differences, a nation will assist overtly or covertly their sworn enemy.

    • 回复: @SolontoCroesus
  162. geokat62 说:
    @Kratoklastes

    And of course if the target refuses to be drawn into a compromising situation, their political career ends right there…

    Here’s a previous comment I posted:

    这就是游戏的玩法:通过大厅的力量,美国政府与犹太复国主义国家签订了谅解备忘录,以“分享”收集到的所有美国公民的信号情报。 为了降低敲诈的风险,谅解备忘录规定,如果以色列人发现美国政府高级官员的信息,他们将立即销毁它。 有没有想过为什么一些国会议员——林赛·格雷厄姆、约翰·麦凯恩、丹尼斯·哈斯特、扬·沙科夫斯基等——是犹太复国主义国家的热情捍卫者?......现在你知道了。

    http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/11/nsa-americans-personal-data-israel-documents

    我们只是发现了这个秘密的谅解备忘录,因为爱德华·斯诺登有足够的勇气公开它。 您会以为这样一个故事的重磅炸弹会在《纽约时报》的头版(所谓的记录报纸)上报道,对吗? 这是《纽约时报》的玛格丽特·沙利文在披露信息后不久写的:

    ……在本文的《泰晤士报》上没有提及之后,我在星期一早上询问了总编辑Dean Baquet。

    “我不认为这是一个重要或令人惊讶的故事,”他说。 “我认为,我们在追逐较小的方面投入的精力越多,我们打破自己的时间就越少。 更不用说报道叙利亚的动乱了。”

    因此,我通过电子邮件问他,这本质上是报告资源的问题吗? 毕竟,《泰晤士报》本来可以发表由路透社或美联社等电讯公司撰写的文章。

    “我会说资源和新闻判断,”他回答。

    在一个有许多新闻媒体的世界里,他说:“我们可以把所有的时间都花在匹配故事上,而不是真正报道新闻。 这个人很谦虚,感觉不值得把某人从更大的企业中带走。”

    http://publiceditor.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/09/16/guardian-story-on-israel-and-n-s-a-is-not-surprising-enough-to-cover/?_r=0

    • 回复: @Kratoklastes
  163. @Corvinus

    更好的是,人们如何制定一项法律,将记者或新闻机构,甚至普通公民的谎言定为刑事犯罪?

    You could ask European governments how they did it. Most have laws mandating prison time for anyone discussing or publishing anything not in full agreement with the official version of the holocau\$t. The 1st Amendment is the only reason the US doesn’t have and similar laws.

    • 回复: @Corvinus
    , @L.K
  164. Corvinus 说:
    @geokat62

    “One need not be a legal expert to realize when one is being lied to. Are you truly suggesting Judy Miller wasn’t lying in her reporting?”

    Judy Miller was telling her version of the truth, because you and others have evidence of her telling things other than the truth, she ought to be immediately put in jail. How is one able to legislate lying in light of freedom of speech/the press? How do you determine their intent from a legal point of view?

    George Hay, 1799—“There is truth in opinion, as well as in fact. Error in opinion may do as much harm, as falsity in fact; it may be as morally wrong, and it may [originate from motives which may be malicious in nature]…But the power of controlling opinions has never yet been claimed…and the difficulty of distinguishing fact and opinion is extremely great, and no criteria has been established under law to make such a determination.”

    In other words, opinions rooted in falsehoods cannot be legislated against.

    “Are there not laws currently on the books that throw people in jail if they scream “fire” in a crowded movie theatre?”

    This situation has been recognized by the Supreme Court as being a reasonable exception to the First Amendment because there is a clear and present danger.

    “Well, Judy was screaming “WMD” and the consequences of her doing so were exponentially more devastating than someone screaming “fire.””

    How do you prove “exponentially more devastating”? What legal standard are you able to currently employ under the freedom of the press? Would Congress even enact such legislation and would the Supreme Court be able to craft a decision justifying it?

    Exactly why your comparison holds no water.

    “So if we have a law to protect a few movie goers, shouldn’t we have a law that protects against the wholesale slaughter of hundreds of thousands, if not a million, people?”



    Perhaps you have Daddy Warbucks cash lying around and are able to exhume the body of Jim Garrison, reanimate him, and have him try the case.

    • 回复: @annamaria
    , @Art
  165. @Clyde

    你可能要注意一个事实,自 2006 年真主党公牛清理以色列的犁以来,以色列就没有惹过黎巴嫩。

    • 回复: @Clyde
  166. Anonymous • 免责声明 说:

    I have been watching the steady, depressing machinations of the apartheid settler colony and it’s international talons in attempting to stifle criticism with growing concern. It is very depressing, but there is hope.

    I remember in New Zealand, some years ago, that israel was receiving a bout of mild negative PR – it may have been after the Mossad were caught, red-handed, attempting to steal the identity of a dead paraplegic child-which was followed by a case of Jewish gravestones being defaced in Wellington. My parents’ (NZ Diplomats) immediate reaction to the latter incident was that it may well have been perpetrated by friends of israel themselves.

    There seem to be an ever increasing number of accounts of serious ruptures within the racist state.
    It is my hope and wish that these vile criminals will tear themselves apart. It will be fun to watch.

  167. annamaria 说:
    @marwan

    Do you see either Chinese or Papuans directing the US policies and extracting billions from the US taxpayers pockets? Moreover, neither Chinese nor Papuans have put their grievances in kind of “never-again” monuments around the US and Europe and neither of them demands a special treatment for their special sufferings, all while attacking the freedom of speech and academic freedoms. Time to step down from your wooden white horse of “moral superiority.”

    • 回复: @marwan
  168. Art 说:
    @Corvinus

    嗨,Corvinus,

    All three of those links you provided where pro-Israel links – NOT anti Israel nukes – you provided no evidence of the public denunciation of Israeli nukes —- please be honest.

    Looking at your comment history, one can see that you make one pro-Israel pro-Jew post after another – yet you claim, to NOT be a Jew – Hmm?????

    Jesus said “the truth will set you free” – that works for all humans – even Jews. Do you Jews want to be free of your sick obsession with your selves and your tribe?

    My plan is to post the truth about Jew tribalness, Jew nukes, and the evil that is Israel.

    Yours Art

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  169. annamaria 说:
    @Corvinus

    “Judy Miller was telling her version of the truth”
    This is the best apologia for Judy Miller.
    A characterization of Judy Miller by an honest person that knew Judy for many years: “Apparently, she felt that belonging to the right group – the neocons — implied the possession of every sort of virtue. It is my opinion that Judy was always alert to seize every advantage before it escaped her. Everything tempted her. She was always anxious for self-advancement by any means. One may blame her for her greed and ambition, her determination to turn things to her profit, but are common flaws.”
    http://turcopolier.typepad.com/sic_semper_tyrannis/2015/05/judy-miller-by-richard-sale.html
    Judy Miller was and is a bloody opportunist. There is no such thing as “the truth” for her contorted mind, because nobody gets money, status, and promotion for the truth. (Rich Sale: “The ideal of the journalists with whom I have worked and have respected, is the reverence for facts, especially inconvenient facts”). Judy Miller is a classic exhibit of a presstitute of psychopathic variety, since she is seemingly oblivious to the results of her “promotional” papers. The wars of aggression that she helped to initiate, have resulted in destruction of the millions of human lives, including deaths of multitude of children. She was and is a “good German” for the ziocons’ cause.

  170. Art 说:
    @Corvinus

    Judy Miller was telling her version of the truth

    Oh yes – the modern Esther – working for the Jew tribe.

    She told lies that started a war against an Israeli enemy.

    That Jew woman has a lot of blood on her hands.

  171. @Corvinus

    “This is all well before 1942, when the first evidence of the alleged holocaust was published by Rabbi Stephen Wise.”

    Holocaust denier, huh. Oh, brother

    .

    Holocaust derangement syndrome. Oh, brother.

    The point to absorb is that of chronology:
    In 1932-33 Stalin, for the purpose of advancing communism, killed ~8 million people.
    Even as this was taking place, Roosevelt allied with him and therefore with the Communist system, which, as you asserted, was so heinous that USA partnered with Israel to confront.

    What changed about Communism between 1933 when Roosevelt endorsed Communism and whenever it was that USA partnered with Israel to combat Communism?

    In 1933, there was no holocaust.
    In 1933, Stalin & Communists were killing Christians and others in Russia.

    Why did FDR and Morgenthau go behind the backs of US State Department (and also Congress) to send money and weapons to a communist regime that was perpetrating genocide?

    Repeat: In 1933, there was no holocaust (of Jews) being carried out in Germany.

    Tim Snyder is author of 血地。 Here’s how he explained how and why chronology matters if one is doing authentic history:

    [更多]

    In history you can’t really say something happened in 1933 because something was going to happen in 1945. You can only explain things that happened in 1933 by events up to and including 1933. It’s very tempting to apply later events . . . but we can only understand historical events in terms of the causes that bring them about. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qcXMV-4HfXs

    -

    The same way that the Reagan courted members of the Iranian government after the hostage situation to sell weapons to Israel and use that cash to fund Nicaraguan freedom fighters, while simultaneously funding Saddam Hussein in his Jihad against his bitter rival;

    I could be gallant and assume you merely reversed the sellers and buyers of weapons, but I choose not to.

    你理解错了。

    Israel was the broker/seller —

    “It was planned that Israel would ship weapons to Iran, and then the United States would resupply Israel and receive the Israeli payment.” – wikipedia
    (Heaven fore fend that Israel not end up a beneficiary somewhere in the scheme. Don’t be a 免费.)

    Iran was the buyer.
    Contras in Nicaragua were recipients of the loot.
    US taxpayers also saw their wallets lightened.

    This was not about Israel functioning to assist US in fighting Communism, except to the extent that IRAN under the Shah had been the US buttress against Communism in the Gulf region. (Iran was the first crisis the UN had to confront: Communist Russia refused to leave Iran post-WWII; only UN and threats of US force to back it up defused the threat of WWIII).
    When the Iranian people tired of being oppressed by a US puppet who tortured the Iranian people and squandered Iranian treasure on weaponry bought from USA (除其他外,) they rebelled against the Shah and replaced him with Ayatollah Khomeini.
    In the weakness of that early revolutionary period, at least these three things happened:

    1. Saddam took advantage of Iranian turmoil to wage war with Iran over access to a waterway. USA encouraged Saddam in that war, out of pique at Iran having decamped.

    2. Israel went ape-shit. They had lost their key pillar in their Periphery Doctrine; they lost access to Iranian treasury and internal secrets; (Ronen Bergman discussed this in The Secret War With Iran, ch. on 贝壳行动 iirc )

    3. USA lost its buttress to Communist threat to the Persian Gulf region.

    -
    Nevertheless, in the process of your misguided argument, you have demonstrated yet one more set of that humanity that you so love that was oppressed by Communism; namely, the Iranian AND Iraqi people — what’s that, about 120 million all told?

    Had Franklin Roosevelt followed Herbert Hoover’s informed and earnest advice and stayed out of the way and let Hitler and Stalin duke it out, “a century of peace would have ensued.” (see Freedom Betrayed, by Herbert Hoover).

    27 million Russians would not have died.
    12 million Germans would not have died.
    8 million Poles would not have died.
    ~5 million Iranians would not have died.
    ~4 million Iraqis would not have died
    ~ 1 million Palestinians would not have died
    500 000 American soldiers would not have died
    475,000 Italians would not have died
    ~195,000 Jews would not have died

    All because Franklin Roosevelt and Henry Morgenthau, Jr. allied with a genocidal Communist when much of the rest of the world though that regime should be destroyed, and spent the next 50 years trying to destroy it.

    Israel has never been an asset to USA, not in defense against Communism or anything else –hell, Jews were major originators of Communism, major participants in Communism. Israel has always been a net taker in the US-Israel special relationship.

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  172. Thirdeye 说:
    @Clyde

    Israel is fine with ISIS as long as they target the Shia. They see ISIS as something that can get those pesky Shia out of the way so they can follow through on the Yinon Plan, gaining control of their “promised” lands.

    • 同意: geokat62
  173. marwan 说:
    @annamaria

    Do you see either Chinese or Papuans directing the US policies and extracting billions from the US taxpayers pockets? Moreover, neither Chinese nor Papuans have put their grievances in kind of “never-again” monuments around the US and Europe and neither of them demands a special treatment for their special sufferings, all while attacking the freedom of speech and academic freedoms. Time to step down from your wooden white horse of “moral superiority.”

    Yes I do see Chinese directing US policies and extracting billions from taxpayers pockets . You don’t see this ?? Not surprised that an Alt right / White Nationalist is blind to facts . Yet you guys are the superior race , that can’t even manage basic human functions like sex and procreation . 1.1 kids per white couple !!!! The internet and its time wasting / sedentary lifestyle encouraging allure has been the last nail in your alt right / white nationalist coffin.

    As far as Papuans , they are denied a voice . Indonesia has made Occupied Papua a closed military zone . Indonesia has killed 20X as many Papuans than Israel has killed Palestinians . Indonesia has killed 500,000 Papuans without a whisper from world media . Meanwhile every Palestinian death makes headlines . Would you silently accept this from Israel ?? Do you think Occupied Papua gets enough media attention ??

    • 回复: @geokat62
    , @annamaria
  174. alexander 说:
    @Corvinus

    允许我,吉欧

    科瓦努斯先生。

    发动侵略战争被普遍认为是最高的国际罪行。

    Defrauding the American people into committing a supreme international crime should not only be considered a criminal act…… but a supreme TERRORIST act…and absolutely nothing less….Nothing ….less.

    Its not on the issue of “reporting” that these media acolytes should be judged,,,its on the issue of TERRORISM against the United States of America and its entire citizenry.

    可耻。

    Ask not for whom the bell tolls, Mr Corvanus, It tolls for thee and thy defrauders who are nothing more than Terrorists……. with a capital T.

    Corvanus…you are welcome to “fraudulate” and “obfuscate” to your hearts content.

    But the truth is …Guantanamo Bay is way to good for these fraudulent scum.

    Perhaps you should be remaindered there, too….to think about it for a couple dozen years.

    Then you might learn a proper lesson in the distinction between “defrauding ” and “reporting”.

    你和那些你急于捍卫、学习、永远不要再做的人怎么办?

    • 回复: @Corvinus
    , @RobinG
  175. marwan 说:
    @geokat62

    Thanks for the dissertation . Maybe you need to spend less time on the internet , as your reasoning skills are suffering . Most of what copy pasted is not anything to do with Israel . UN sanctions ?? wtf has nothing to do with Israel . and on and on .

    Anyway if you want to live out your alt right / white nationalist fantasies and have them come true , just stop obsessing over jews and try something novel like having sex and procreating a next white generation . Can you manage to get off the internet long enough ?? I know you are alt right /white nationalist and comment sections are your natural habitat but if you don’t have white children , then all the whining you do about jews online is moot because there won’t be a next white generation . And funny thing is that the few young whites out there these days find your alt right / white nationalist noises to be garbage and they reject it . Young whites like gays and diversity and multiculturalism and all the things you hate . I should say the famous ” WAKE UP WHITE MAN “!!!!!!!!!!!……..But alas its too late !!!!!!

    • 回复: @geokat62
  176. @Rehmat

    The major problem apart from your random pointless and unfocused rudeness is the irrelevance of what you right in so far as it purports to be a reply to what I wrote. You should try to avoid sounding stupid: Jews can be arrogant enough about Muslims’ IQs without your giving them helpful proof.

    • 回复: @marwan
    , @Clyde
  177. Svigor 说:

    我是同一个匿名评论者(或“巨魔”对小号部分的那些“真正的手柄”)

    作为一个匿名的胆小鬼似乎是在坚持你的乌鸦。 每次发表评论时,您都会谈论它。 或者,也许你没有。 也许你的其他帖子完全是矛盾的,一系列彻头彻尾的谎言。 这不像任何人都知道。

    There isn’t any “vague whining”. It’s simple–some people here have a Joo fixation. As in EVERY single political, economic, and social problem is attributed to that group without careful consideration of the machinations of their own group. The word is “projection”.

    You can’t back that up. Not even close. And it’s manifestly false; there’s literally 没有人 here who blames EVERY political, economic, and social problem on Jews. I doubt there’s even a commenter here who comments on EVERY political, economic, and social problem, let alone blames them all on the Jews.

    Up your game. You suck.

    Mr Giraldi, the reason that you are called an anti-semite is because it is pretty obvious that that is what you are. As we shall see:

    Don’t bother proving it. We already know he’s an “anti-Semite”; somebody Jews don’t like. It’s a badge of honor and a sign of moral courage.

    All you jew obsessed freaks here are fucking morons, how many nonwhites like chinese and indians have flooded into vancouver lately and all you fucking imbeciles talk about are jews.

    Organized Jewry is monolithically pro-open-borders.

    Yes, Joos have a lobby. Yes, Joos are tribal. Yes, Joos seek to look out for their interests. Just like any other group, like your lobby, your tribe, your interests.

    Yes, the White Lobby’s to be feared. The Anglo-Saxon Lobby is a real monster. Want to know their positions? Check out the Jewish Lobby’s web sites.

    Corvinus, are you Lenny Kravitz? It would explain a lot.

    科瓦努斯

    LOL

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  178. geokat62 说:
    @marwan

    Indonesia has killed 20X as many Papuans than Israel has killed Palestinians . Indonesia has killed 500,000 Papuans without a whisper from world media . Meanwhile every Palestinian death makes headlines . Would you silently accept this from Israel ?? Do you think Occupied Papua gets enough media attention ??

    介意告诉我们印度尼西亚游说团体的首字母缩写词是什么? 介意告诉我们他们领导人的名字和他在国会联席会议上发表讲话的次数以及他得到的起立鼓掌的次数吗?

    • 回复: @marwan
  179. Corvinus 说:
    @Carroll Price

    “You could ask European governments how they did it.”

    We could, but why?

    “The 1st Amendment is the only reason the US doesn’t have and similar laws.”

    告诉我一些我不知道的事情。

  180. @Oscar Peterson

    Corvinus knows full well what is meant by the term fundamentally unproven. By asking stupid questions he asks you to do research that is easily done by anyone except apparently Corvinus.

    This is also an oft repeated tactic by him where he attempts to appear to be smart whilst demonstrating actually being the opposite.

  181. ” When AIPAC and its overseas clones act for Israel the host nations in which these organizations exist should recognize exactly what is taking place. ”
    It is not that they are not recognizing what is taking place.Rather it is the fact that they are helpless in doing any thing about it.Israel is a millstone around the West’s neck.The West will sink by the weight of this millstone.

  182. geokat62 说:
    @marwan

    UN sanctions ?? wtf has nothing to do with Israel . and on and on .

    I hate repeating myself, but you leave me no other choice. Here’s an exchange I had a few years back:

    Other commenter: Oh, and you blame Israel for sanctions on Iraq? Why don’t you blame Israel for all of the world’s woes? You’re being ridiculous again.

    geokat62: Have you read this story reported by Mondoweiss?

    http://mondoweiss.net/2012/02/the-iraq-war-coverup-what-did-aipac-do-and-when-did-it-do-it

    早在 2000 年,AIPAC 就专门致力于加强对伊拉克的制裁,因为伊拉克拥有“大规模杀伤性武器”。 还记得他们吗? 2000 年 XNUMX 月,AIPAC 向国会发出行动警报,敦促其成员向国会施加压力,向克林顿政府施压。

    如果取消制裁,萨达姆可以将石油收入用于加速伊拉克的军事计划,而不是用于伊拉克公民的人道主义需求。

    您今天必须联系您的代表并敦促他们在给克林顿总统的信上签名。

    然后在 2003 年 XNUMX 月,据 JWeekly 报道,AIPAC 反对由加利福尼亚共和党人汤姆坎贝尔领导的国会努力,然后在参议院竞选中与黛安范斯坦竞争,以削弱这些制裁:

    来自伊拉克的军事威胁是美国以色列公共事务委员会的主要关切,该委员会赞成保留经济制裁。

    “解除制裁不会使伊拉克人民受益,”居住在旧金山的 AIPAC 全国副总裁艾米·弗里德金 (Amy Friedkin) 说。 相反,它将使萨达姆获得更多的石油资金,并用它来积累更多的武器。 她补充说,这将对中东其他地区和世界构成威胁……

    坎贝尔和他的盟友现在正在支持 HR 3825,这是众议员小约翰科尼尔斯(密歇根州民主党)的立法,该法案将允许美国公司在联合国石油换食品计划之外向伊拉克出口食品和药品。 Campbell 和众议员 Zoe Lofgren (D-San Jose) 是该法案的共同提案国之一。

    弗里德金说 AIPAC 反对该法案,尽管该组织承认发起人提出该法案的“非常富有同情心的理由”。

    AIPAC 太平洋西北地区主管埃利奥特·布兰特 (Elliot Brandt) 表示:“AIPAC 无意伤害伊拉克人民,但我们在伤害萨达姆·侯赛因制造大规模杀伤性武器的能力方面拥有既得利益。 与其将制裁伤害伊拉克人民归咎于制裁,我们应该将责任归咎于萨达姆侯赛因,他愤世嫉俗地残忍地利用他的人民作为政治名片来获得同情和支持。”

    现在,再次告诉我,谁在开玩笑?

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  183. delia ruhe 说:

    Yet another excellent and needed piece by Philip Geraldi, who is especially good on the topic of Israel and its many crimes.

    I see by the comments thread that the hasbarites have infested this website too. The repetition from website to website is mind-numbing. I guess the lobbies look for the stupidest people they can find so that they can keep up this parroting behaviour.

  184. marwan 说:
    @geokat62

    介意告诉我们印度尼西亚游说团体的首字母缩写词是什么? 介意告诉我们他们领导人的名字和他在国会联席会议上发表讲话的次数以及他得到的起立鼓掌的次数吗?

    哇,你是一个多么富有同情心和体贴的人啊!!!!
    他读到 500,000 巴布亚平民在印度尼西亚的占领和种族灭绝中丧生,他只关心演讲和起立鼓掌!!!!
    Why can’t the alt right / white nationalist movement get any good press ???

  185. marwan 说:
    @Wizard of Oz

    The major problem apart from your random pointless and unfocused rudeness is the irrelevance of what you right in so far as it purports to be a reply to what I wrote. You should try to avoid sounding stupid: Jews can be arrogant enough about Muslims’ IQs without your giving them helpful proof.

    I don’t think rehmat is even a muslim at all . I think he is a 聪明 Alt Right / White Nationalist pretending to be a muslim and killing 2 birds with one stone . Trolling jews and making muslims look even more low iq …………

  186. Corvinus 说:
    @Art

    ” you provided no evidence of the public denunciation of Israeli nukes.”

    我被要求提供有关以色列及其杰里科导弹计划讨论的证据。

    “yet you claim, to NOT be a Jew – Hmm?????”

    任何谈论 Joos 并且没有在充满反 Joos 的帖子上谴责他们的人,都必须是 Joo。 先生,这不合逻辑(Spock 眉头)。

    “My plan is to post the truth about Jew tribalness, Jew nukes, and the evil that is Israel.”

    你的真实版本,是的。 类似于我的版本,揭露你部落的虚伪,你的核武器,以及你部落的邪恶,无论你属于哪个群体。

    种族歧视是反人类的代码。

    • 回复: @Art
  187. Svigor 说:

    You know, I kid about Lenny Kravitz, but “Corvinus” could very well be mixed Jewish-black. A character like Corvinus from the 之星最 series, with its silly Half-Blood Prince sensibilities, would appeal to a Zionist-defending, black-defending mischling.

  188. Clyde 说:
    @Wizard of Oz

    @Rehmat
    The major problem apart from your random pointless and unfocused rudeness is the irrelevance of what you right in so far as it purports to be a reply to what I wrote. You should try to avoid sounding stupid: Jews can be arrogant enough about Muslims’ IQs without your giving them helpful proof.

    For sure Rehmat is on the Likud Zio-Hasbara payroll to make Muslims look like imbeciles.

  189. Corvinus 说:
    @SolontoCroesus

    “Why did FDR and Morgenthau go behind the backs of US State Department (and also Congress) to send money and weapons to a communist regime that was perpetrating genocide?”

    The lesser of two evils, a philosophy embraced by individuals, groups, and nations since the beginning of time.

    Nations have interests, not allies. If it suits their interests at a particular moment in time, regardless of ideological differences, a nation will assist overtly or covertly their sworn enemy.

    As far as I know, the Americans providing arms and material to the Soviets for their fight against Nazi Germany via lend-lease, which was under the purview of Congress. Unless you have information regarding cash and guns received by the Soviets prior to this official policy.

    “I could be gallant and assume you merely reversed the sellers and buyers of weapons, but I choose not to.”

    You’re right, you’re not gallant amid my mistake.

    “This was not about Israel functioning to assist US in fighting Communism…”

    Correct, Israel served as the go-between in a deal that enabled the U.S. to combat communism in Central America despite a Congressional ban. Israel was used as a means to an end.

    “you have demonstrated yet one more set of that humanity that you so love that was oppressed by Communism; namely, the Iranian AND Iraqi people”

    As has the millions murdered in the name of Christianity, in the name of the United States, in the name of European superiority, in the name of African tribal warfare, in the name of Chinese dominance, etc. Humanity has no bounds in its inhumanity.

    “Had Franklin Roosevelt followed Herbert Hoover’s informed and earnest advice and stayed out of the way and let Hitler and Stalin duke it out, “a century of peace would have ensued.”

    Given the complexity and nuances of geo-politics and human nature, COULD, not would.

    “All because Franklin Roosevelt and Henry Morgenthau, Jr. allied with a genocidal Communist when much of the rest of the world though that regime should be destroyed”

    The United States, and Great Britain, and France, and Canada, and Australia, and a host of other nations on the Allied Side, in the name of humanity. Except out of humanity arise inhumane courses of action.

  190. rvg 说:
    @marwan

    Frankly I think they are obssessed too much about Jews, Blacks, and Muslims.

  191. Corvinus 说:
    @Svigor

    “Yes, the White Lobby’s to be feared. The Anglo-Saxon Lobby is a real monster. Want to know their positions?”

    The same positions you hold about anyone who is opposed to your tribe.

    “And it’s manifestly false; there’s literally no one here who blames EVERY political, economic, and social problem on Jews.”

    Communism = Joo origination –> Political and economic
    Cultural Marxism = Joo origination –> Social
    Western governments puppets of Joos –> Political
    Jooish banksters –> Political, economic, social

    From these four foundational categories, Joos are to blame for everything, big and small, macro and micro.

    Praytell, what problems are Joos NOT associated with, Svigor?

  192. Corvinus 说:
    @geokat62

    你如何证明“指数级更具破坏性”?

    在新闻自由的情况下,您目前能够采用什么法律标准?

    国会甚至会颁布这样的立法吗,最高法院是否能够做出决定来证明它的合理性?

    How is one able to legislate lying in light of freedom of speech/the press? How do you determine their intent from a legal point of view?

  193. Clyde 说:
    @Carroll Price

    你可能要注意一个事实,自 2006 年真主党公牛清理以色列的犁以来,以色列就没有惹过黎巴嫩。

    Israel played by too civilized rules of engagement. You know they could have wasted your Muslim idols otherwise. But also notice the Hezbollah chickenshits haven’t really messed with the Izzies since 2006 when they got hurt. I read they have busy lately, engaged in the ages old Muslim Sunni vs Shiite ritual human sacrifices to allah. This time in Syria

    近期标题:
    “Hezbollah captives in Syria condemn the organization’s involvement in Syria’s civil war”

    My handy dandy Muslim flow chart shows Hezbollah happen to be psychopathic Shiite wackos. So I’m gonna take a wild guess they are fighting on Assad’s side. Ya think?

    • 回复: @Carroll Price
  194. Corvinus 说:
    @alexander

    “Initiating a war of aggression is universally recognized as the SUPREME international crime.”

    不是如果一个国家是赢家。

    “Defrauding the American people into committing a supreme international crime should not only be considered a criminal act.”

    找律师起诉。

    “Perhaps you should be remaindered there, too….to think about it for a couple dozen years.”

    And now, ladies, we have reached critical mass. Enter fascism, which is fundamentally anti-humanity. I merely question how and why an opinion can be instantly declared “a lie” to the point that the person uttering that opinion is immediately incarcerated.

    “its on the issue of TERRORISM against the United States of America and its entire citizenry.”

    So, besides responding to a blog post, what are doing about it? As in, are you openly part of a grass roots movement, with signage in tow, ready to make the five o’clock news through your tribe’s own public protest?

    • 回复: @Threecranes
  195. annamaria 说:
    @marwan

    Just to reiterate: “…neither Chinese nor Papuans have put their grievances in kind of “never-again” monuments around the US and Europe and neither of them demands a special treatment for their special sufferings, all while attacking the freedom of speech and academic freedoms. Time to step down from your wooden white horse of “moral superiority.”

    • 回复: @This Is Our Home
  196. @marwan

    Doubtless if Israel was an ordinary, self-sufficient country, people wouldn’t care much about how it treats its Arab subjects. But that of course is the point: it’s NOT an ordinary country and its actions, which stand in startling contrast to how US propaganda and media organs portray Israel, are rather intolerable. The US is responsible for Israeli mistreatment of Arabs (including various wars of aggression) in a way that it’s not responsible for Indonesian atrocities. Nice try at changing the subject, though.

    • 同意: Carroll Price
  197. denk 说:

    真的吗?
    多么可怕的国际阴谋!
    罗夫茂!
    好吧,你还没有看到孩子们,
    EVERY 世界上有中央情报局安全屋的国家,
    又名穆尔坎大使馆!
    呵呵呵呵

  198. geokat62 说:
    @marwan

    哇,你是一个多么富有同情心和体贴的人啊!!!!

    大声笑,这是来自一个 ziotroll 的财富,他对犹太复国主义者/以色列先民决定对伊斯兰教发动战争所造成的所有死亡和破坏没有任何内疚。 即使是笨蛋也意识到 GWOT 的真正目标是通过改变那些被认为敌视犹太复国主义项目的政权来重塑 ME,所有这些都是为了加强丛林中别墅的安全。 如果超过一百万阿拉伯人——在黎巴嫩、伊拉克、利比亚和叙利亚——不得不在这个过程中被屠杀,那就这样吧。

    因此,请不要让我们为超过 500,000 名巴布亚平民流泪。 你似乎忘记了当时驻联合国大使玛德琳·奥尔布赖特(出生于玛丽·贾娜·科尔贝洛娃)在哥伦比亚广播公司记者莱斯利·斯塔尔问她时是如何回答的:“我们听说有 XNUMX 万儿童死亡。 我的意思是,这比死在广岛的孩子还多。 而且,你知道,这个价格值得吗?” 奥尔布赖特回答说:“我们认为这个价格是值得的。” 真正的犹太复国主义同情和关怀如何?

    • 回复: @marwan
  199. L.K 说:
    @Carroll Price

    是的,卡罗尔·普莱斯,在许多“自由”的欧洲国家,那些怀疑官方全息谎言的人往往会受到罚款和监禁。
    欧洲的言论自由和“民主”太多了……
    但是你的第一修正案在很大程度上也是一种幻觉。
    在美国,又名 ZUSA inc.,使用软实力来哄人的权力创造了奇迹。
    谈论 zamerica 的全息骗局,第二天你就会失业……更不用说角色暗杀了。 如果您对此有疑问,请询问 Fred Leuchter。

    ps:还有很多其他主题——除了 zamerica 中的大牛(最神圣的母牛),尽管是第一个,但它会使“自由”的 zamerican 公民落入热水中。 只是说。

  200. marwan 说:
    @geokat62

    你仍然没有回答为什么你不关心被伊斯兰印度尼西亚政府杀害的 500,000 巴布亚平民,这是一个致力于种族灭绝的政府。

    • 回复: @annamaria
    , @bunga
  201. @Corvinus

    “找律师起诉。”

    啊哈! 你是犹太人!

  202. Seraphim 说:

    @以色列外交部有一支有偿“志愿者”队伍,负责监控全球网站并采取补救措施,还有一个类似的小组在总理办公室工作

    这被称为哈斯巴拉。 这篇文章的大量“评论”显示了 hasbaratchicks 的活跃程度。 没有什么比“以色列的国际阴谋”(也许只有“犹太人的阴谋”)的“谣言”更能激怒他们了!

  203. @geokat62

    哈斯特和格雷厄姆太有趣了……格雷厄姆特别让我想起了“美国爸爸”中的“迪尔·谢泼德”角色(并不是说这有什么问题 – 说真的,如果世界上所有出柜的男同性恋者都接受他们的同性恋,那么世界上就会少一些假装大男子主义的新保守主义者)。

    还有 Hastert 是“wrasslin 教练”——就好像一个成年男子喜欢在汗流浃背的十几岁男人身边闲逛一样,这一切都有些悬疑……(这是在看着你,拉姆斯菲尔德……)

    除了封闭的同性恋者之外,还有一种模式。 这些人(以及像 Jim Bakker、Swaggart、Haggard 和其他人 - [ahem]Boehner???[ahem])都有可以用来对付他们的东西,如果他们 暗示 他们正在考虑取消预订。

    可怜他们中的至少两个,他们没有因为威胁要离开保留地而被打倒:他们的垮台要平凡得多……他们说“地狱没有被蔑视的女人的愤怒”,但一个被蔑视的同性恋情人肯定会来关闭。

  204. geokat62 说:

    是我还是其他人注意到 MFA 为他们的 ziotrolls 提供了更新的谈话要点,希望他们能够更成功地与对手交战? 我相信新方法是基于通过一遍又一遍地问同样的问题来让你的对手追赶他们的尾巴的原则。 我建议我们一次性回答他们的问题,而忽略他们不可避免的后续问题。

    正如我之前所说,无论他们多久更新一次谈话要点,他们仍然会失败,因为他们肩负着捍卫站不住脚的艰巨任务……根本无法回避这个问题。 因此,就像 Wile E Coyote 一样,他们应该向 Acme Inc. 申请退款。

    • 回复: @Carroll Price
    , @Corvinus
  205. @annamaria

    马万让你看起来很傻。 好吧,实际上是你的愚蠢让我们移民限制主义者看起来很愚蠢。 请停下。 可能有太多大屠杀纪念馆,但事实仍然是 1 名巴勒斯坦人以 50 名巴布亚人的速度悲痛,这只是我们对杀害他们的人的种族的奇怪痴迷的结果。

    我们目前是地球上最可悲的民族。 我们在迷恋犹太人的同时放弃了我们的国家。 我们已经完全自我保护了。 甚至将受害者身份置于我们对外国人民的怀抱中。

  206. Anonymous • 免责声明 说:
    @marwan

    你在保卫以色列和 AIPAC 时提到“一帆风顺”占领军,这有点讽刺。 你很方便地忽略了这样一个事实,即土耳其人、中国人以及你提到的其他“占领”势力都没有对东道国公民进行恶魔般的恶行,这与以色列不同。 然而,AIPAC 和它在其他西方国家的同行可能会惊恐地看到你接受以色列作为占领军。 也许你现在会受到同样的恶毒和完全恶意的人身攻击,以同样的方式诋毁你,就像文章中提到的这种欺负男孩策略的其他受害者一样。

  207. @Clyde

    以色列的交战规则过于文明

    当然他们做到了。 在战败后用白磷炮轰黎巴嫩,并在黎巴嫩南部播下由希拉里·克林顿紧急发送的数百万枚集束炸弹(均属于国际公认的战争罪行)。

    这是维基百科的链接,然后是文章的摘录。 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_Lebanon_War,以及一篇关于真主党如何击败以色列的 Counterpunch 文章的链接。

    “据人权观察称,在战争的最后 72 小时内,以色列军队用集束炸弹淹没了该地区。[253] 人权观察“发现以色列国防军使用集束弹药既不分青红皂白,而且不成比例,违反了国际人道法,在某些地方可能构成战争罪”,因为“绝大多数 [被丢弃] 在以色列知道定居点迫在眉睫。”[253] 停火后,由于以色列未爆炸的集束炸弹,黎巴嫩南部的部分地区仍然无法居住。[258] 以色列国防军还使用磷弹攻击黎巴嫩的平民区。 [259] 炮弹最初设计用于在战场情况下产生烟幕,但白色磷光体对人体也特别有害,因为它会在肉体内部继续燃烧。 炮击被调查为违反国际法。[260]”

    http://www.counterpunch.org/2006/10/13/how-hezbollah-defeated-israel-2/

    • 回复: @Clyde
  208. @geokat62

    正如我之前所说,无论他们多久更新一次谈话要点,他们仍然会失败,因为他们肩负着捍卫站不住脚的艰巨任务……

    Agreed. In the long run, truth always emerges as the victor over self-serving propaganda and out-right lies. Which, among many others, explains why the Jewish version of 9/11 and the holocau\$t are now recognized by the entire world as financial swindles of gigantic proportions. With Zionist Jews being directly responsible for both.

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  209. @This Is Our Home

    有人在国家利益问题上说不清楚。 其实我怀疑你很清楚,因此尝试改变主题。

    • 回复: @This Is Our Home
  210. Corvinus 说:
    @geokat62

    是只有我还是其他人注意到,反Joo 的一切人群都将他们的鸭子与他们的重复评论排成一排,不幸的结果是无可救药地旋转他们的车轮?

    “我建议我们一次性回答他们的问题,而忽略他们不可避免的后续问题。”

    是的,确实回答问题。

    一个人如何能够根据言论/新闻自由来立法撒谎?

    您如何从法律角度确定他们的意图?

    你如何证明“指数级更具破坏性”?

    在新闻自由的情况下,您目前能够采用什么法律标准?

    国会甚至会颁布这样的立法吗,最高法院是否能够做出决定来证明它的合理性?

  211. Corvinus 说:
    @Carroll Price

    “Which, among many others, explains why the Jewish version of 9/11 and the holocau\$t are now recognized by the entire world as financial swindles of gigantic proportions.”

    因此,与被奇特的 Joos 欺骗的数亿人不同,相比之下,您和您的部落如何无可否认地理解真相?

    你和你同类中的其他人在你的观点上是独一无二的,拥有超乎寻常的高智商和触手可及的力量吗?

    除了在博客上写作以向公众揭露 Joos 的退化性质,您和您的部落还积极做什么?

    • 回复: @DaveE
  212. @Beefcake the Mighty

    奥尔班成功,普京成功,特朗普成功,玛丽娜勒庞成功。 倒霉的互联网犹太人痴迷者完全不成功。

  213. Clyde 说:
    @Carroll Price

    我只会在你关于白磷使用的谎言上浪费时间

    以色列首次承认它在第二次黎巴嫩战争期间用磷弹袭击了真主党目标。 白磷会对被它击中的人造成非常痛苦且通常是致命的化学灼伤,直到最近以色列坚持认为它只使用这种炸弹来标记目标或领土。

    以色列国防军在黎巴嫩战争中使用磷弹的声明是由负责政府与议会关系的部长雅各布·埃德里(Jacob Edery)宣布的。 MK Zahava Gal-On(Meretz-Yahad)曾就此事向他提问。

    “以色列国防军拥有不同形式的磷弹药,”埃德里说。 “以色列国防军在与真主党的战争中使用磷弹攻击空地上的军事目标。”

    埃德里还指出,国际法并没有禁止使用磷,“以色列国防军根据国际法规则使用了这种类型的弹药。”
    阅读更多: http://www.haaretz.com/israel-admits-using-phosphorus-bombs-during-war-in-lebanon-1.203078

    你是个病夫。 您在 Unz 发布的内容中有 85% 是反犹太材料。 犹太复国主义者和哈斯巴拉特工在你的大脑中免费生活。

    • 回复: @Art
  214. @helena

    谢谢海伦娜。

    美丽的圣地。

    • 回复: @RobinG
  215. annamaria 说:
    @marwan

    这是本次讨论所涉及的一篇文章(上)的名称:“以色列的国际阴谋”。 对于文章的主题,即以色列的国际阴谋对西方世界的影响很差,对中东的影响很悲惨,您有什么要补充的吗?

    • 回复: @marwan
  216. DaveE 说:
    @Corvinus

    没有什么是你和你的恶棍需要知道的。

  217. annamaria 说:
    @This Is Our Home

    你相信通过侮辱别人和绕道而行,你就可以展示你的优越感吗? 同样奇怪的是,您的手柄听起来与“Beiteinu”非常相似。

  218. marwan 说:
    @annamaria

    在与 的初始交流结束很久之后,您一直在评论和重复相同的事情。 看你没有理由反驳我的事实。 其他海报,甚至是alt right海报都已经告诉你,你完全归我所有。 放弃吧 。 每一个帖子都让你更加尴尬。

    • 回复: @annamaria
  219. Anonymous • 免责声明 说:

    归咎于(在法国)一个案件因为涉案人是穆斯林而没有得到同样的待遇是很好的,但问题是,在当今世界,这不会得到许多人的同情。
    这也许是反以色列阵线的主要问题。 他们被迫以一种或另一种方式将其与穆斯林的防御运动相结合,而在这一点上,大多数人关闭了他们的思想。

  220. Svigor 说:
    @marwan

    如果您符合以下条件,您可能是犹太人:

    1 你像黑人一样投票(犹太人占 75-85% 民主党;黑人占 85-95% 民主党)

    2 你像黑人一样抱怨和指责白人goyim

    3 你认为你的同类应该进入所有白人领土,而你的同类在以色列与黑人在利比里亚一样安全和完全远离白人

    4 像黑人一样,你认为犹太人在以色列拥有家园很棒,黑人在利比里亚拥有家园很棒,但白人甚至想在任何地方拥有家园都是反犹太主义!!! 和RRR种族主义!!!

    5 你把一切都归咎于白人,这是“历史的癌症”,就像黑人一样

    6 你倾向于疯狂地夸大你的团队为世界做出的贡献,同时淡化或忽视白人为你的团队所做的事情,就像黑人所做的那样

    7 你喜欢黑人/犹太人制作的堕落媒体

    8 你总是抱怨你的大屠杀,就像黑人总是抱怨他们的奴隶制一样; 你用你的“大借口”来证明一切

    9 你总是在争取更多的大屠杀赔偿,就像黑人总是在争取更多的奴隶制赔偿一样

    10 你总是在寻找通过诉讼赚钱的方法

    11 你和犹太人一样头脑冷静、顽固、缺乏民族自省

    12 哟人丁杜芬

    13 你总是在寻找有犹太血统的名人,就像黑人总是在寻找有黑人血统的名人一样

    14 你喜欢向黑人出售标价很高的凯迪拉克和立体声设备,就像黑人喜欢购买它们一样

    15 你和黑人一样喜欢蹩脚的中国外卖

  221. Svigor 说:

    差点忘了:

    16 你的文化身份以泪流满面的历史解读为中心(大屠杀、计划、永恒的反犹太主义、dindunuffins、bla bla bla)黑人身份的方式(奴隶制、中间通道、种族主义、吉姆克劳、dindunuffins、bla bla bla)

    17 永远不够,就像黑人一样

    18 你把自己的历史粉饰到荒谬的、具有启示性的程度(犹太奴隶?嗯?)就像黑人(黑人奴隶?嗯?)

    19 你认为指责别人的罪行(以色列是无辜的,因为苏丹!)让你摆脱困境,就像黑人一样(黑人犯罪不是黑人犯罪,因为贫穷/种族主义/厨房下沉!)

    20 你认为你的幽默比实际更有趣,就像黑人一样。

    ***

    PS,“谁修剪你的鼻毛?”

  222. Svigor 说:

    11 你和犹太人一样头脑冷静、顽固、缺乏民族自省

    我的错误,显然应该是:

    11 你和黑人一样顽固、顽固、缺乏民族自省

    21 你的团队永远不会停止祝贺自己,就像黑人一样

    22 你的团队会因为其他人像对待黑人一样对待你的团队而发疯

    23 肩上的大筹码,像黑人一样

  223. Svigor 说:

    我总是忘记这一点:

    24 你需要白人比白人更需要你,就像黑人一样

    • 同意: Beefcake the Mighty
  224. Art 说:
    @Corvinus

    种族歧视是反人类的代码。

    Corvinus——你是个笑话——以色列是地球上最亲种族的反人类国家——PERIOD。

    人们永远不应该相信一个会说犹太人的部落的话——艺术

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  225. Art 说:
    @Clyde

    你是个病夫。 您在 Unz 发布的内容中有 85% 是反犹太材料。 犹太复国主义者和哈斯巴拉特工在你的大脑中免费生活。

    嘿克莱德,-习惯了。

    当百分之一的犹太人接受全球范围的胁迫时会发生什么 - 然后是百分之十 - 然后是大多数 - 想想看。

    噶宝贝!

    艺术

  226. annamaria 说:
    @marwan

    你的意思是我没有对你的同胞和哈斯巴拉姐姐给予应有的关注? 来吧。 这是 Unz 评论; 您可能会发自内心地讨厌它(以及讨厌在这里发布的据称是反犹太主义的评论者),但是这个网站是为有思想的成年人准备的,无论这会让您感到多么不安。 再说一遍:本评论网站正在讨论的上述文章的名称是“以色列的国际阴谋”。 你对文章的主题有什么实质性的补充吗?

  227. Svigor 说:

    种族歧视是反人类的代码。

    Corvinus——你是个笑话——以色列是地球上最亲种族的反人类国家——PERIOD。

    妓女的肛门似乎非常喜欢他愚蠢的“支持种族=反人类”的噱头。 当然,这是对事实的 100% 颠倒。 人是有机体。 所有生物都在进化。 它们通过物种形成来实现,这是“种族”的另一种说法。 所有人都有一个种族(或混合种族),所有人都在某种程度上倾向于种族中心主义。 妓女的肛门和其他左派疯子认为尽他们所能努力工作 人性是制胜策略。

    因为他们对人性无动于衷。 他们是人道主义者的对立面。 人道主义者着眼于人性的现实,并设计出与现实相协调的组织原则和战略, 人性。 像妓女的肛门这样的反人道主义者着眼于人性,并看到了一个需要粉碎和扭曲的障碍,以追求他们的 真实 的目标。

    人类 is 分为种族。 这对 Whore's Anus & co 来说还不够好。 他们想摧毁多样性,迫使我们所有人都变成一大片、褐色、无聊的灰色。

    这就像父母和孩子。 爱孩子的父母会努力帮助他们追求美好的生活 合适的 根据他们的气质和能力。 比自己的议程更不关心孩子的父母会试图强迫他们的孩子满足父母的愿望。

    这一切都非常明显。

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  228. Svigor 说:

    爱孩子的父母:

    “亲爱的,我们已经为你寻找了最好的学校。 这是信息。 有一所军事学校,一所宗教学校,一所世俗学校……他们都是班上最好的。 并随时在网上查找其他学校。 我们希望您将我们的建议牢记在心,因为我们年纪大了,也更聪明了,想要为您做最好的事情,但最终您的人生道路是自己的,所以选择最吸引您的那条路。”

    有议程的父母:

    “你要去商学院学习,你将接管家族企业。 有更多的选择不利于你的利益。”

    人道主义者:

    “我认为提供替代方案,如民族国家(除其他外)以及其他类型的国家,如多样化的昆巴亚自由民主国家,是要走的路。 选择越多越好。”

    反人道主义者:

    “如果你是白人,你会接受不同的 kumbayah 自由民主国家并喜欢它。 选择越少越好。”

    人道主义者:

    “如果白人、黑人、棕色人种、黄色人种、犹太人、混血儿、不同的 kumbaya 想要混血儿,或其他任何人,想要他们自己的社区、社区、企业、客户群、机构或国家,那很好。 让他们。”

    反人道主义者:

    “犹太人得到了一个民族国家,非白人得到了事实上的民族国家,而白人得到了不同的 kumbayah 想要混合的国家。 期间,讨论结束。”

    哪个组更好听? 哪个似乎对人类幸福更真正感兴趣?

    • 回复: @Corvinus
    , @another fred
  229. Corvinus 说:
    @Art

    “以色列是地球上最亲种族的反人类国家——PERIOD。”

    单纯的意见。

    再说一次,您准备如何应对他们的统治地位? 与他们所谓的才华相比,你是不是在智力和身体上都那么贫瘠,而不是一遍又一遍地抱怨 Joos 应该为一切负责?

    • 回复: @marwan
    , @Art
  230. Corvinus 说:
    @Svigor

    “犹太人得到了一个民族国家,非白人得到了事实上的民族国家,而白人得到了不同的 kumbayah 想要混合的国家。 期间,讨论结束。”

    由于南方人无法遵守普莱西的原则——隔离但平等的设施),美国公民根据社会契约和公共福利,作为多数人制定了立法,以确保政治和社会自由得到保障。 尽管有这些法律,今天的白人仍然能够搬进白人社区并专门与白人生活在一起。 此外,欧洲各族群在抵达美国后混杂通婚,这种行为在旧国家被视为禁忌。 结果,出现了一个新的族群——美国人,他们长期选择“混合”人们。 同样,那些选择在特定人群中生活和工作的人有自己的选择。

  231. marwan 说:
    @Corvinus

    再说一次,您准备如何应对他们的统治地位? 与他们所谓的才华相比,你是不是在智力和身体上都那么贫瘠,而不是一遍又一遍地抱怨 Joos 应该为一切负责?

    他准备在评论部分发布有关它的信息,仅此而已。 评论区是大自然的栖息地 另类右派/白人民族主义者。 .

    Alt 右/白人民族主义者 甚至懒得与对方发生性关系和生育,更不用说在现实生活中领导一场运动了。它们只存在于网上。 这就是为什么你在现实生活中从未听过这样的谈话。

    新的 另类右派/白人民族主义者 运动将拥有两个犹太儿童的犹太复国主义者唐纳德特朗普加冕为他们种族的救星。 说够了 。

  232. Corvinus 说:
    @Svigor

    “它们通过物种形成来实现,这是“种族”的另一种说法。

    不。 只有一个种族,即人类,由于该物种的某些成员适应其特定环境而具有不同的种族。

    物种形成是由于地理隔离而产生新物种的过程,如泛大陆分离,隔离后来成为不同物种(喇嘛和骆驼)的各种物种,或生殖隔离,当生殖过程的差异将两个后来变得不同的群体分开时物种。 也就是说,如果人类是地球上孤立的种群,很可能会发生异域物种形成。

    然而,由于我们占据了整个地球,这是极不可能的。 此外,种族并没有分化成不同的物种。 所有人都有完全相同的 DNA 链,尽管它们的序列可能会发生变化,通常非常轻微。

    “所有人都在某种程度上倾向于种族中心主义。”

    你说过,在某种程度上。

    “人道主义者着眼于人性的现实,并设计出与现实相协调的组织原则和战略,与人性相协调”。

    你通过假设某些种族最适合或不适合特定的气质和能力来根据你自己的人性构成来判断你的立场。

    “所有生物都在进化。”

    事实上,美国人通常已经演变成一群喜欢混在一起的人。 对于那些希望保持“纯洁”的美国人,他们可以自由地在自己的种族或族群内结婚和生育后代。

  233. Art 说:
    @Corvinus

    再说一次,您准备如何应对他们的统治地位? 与他们所谓的才华相比,你是不是在智力和身体上都那么贫瘠,而不是一遍又一遍地抱怨 Joos 应该为一切负责?

    所以科维努斯,

    你是想让我说我想对犹太人造成身体伤害吗?

    我不——我是一个理想主义的基督徒——我相信生命是神圣的——甚至是犹太人的生命。

    耶稣再次说“真理会让你自由”。 犹太人世界胁迫的真相将打败可恶的犹太复国主义。

    艺术

    ps 你们犹太人的问题是,并非世界上所有的人都是像我这样的理想主义基督徒。

    • 回复: @marwan
  234. marwan 说:
    @Art

    你是想让我说我想对犹太人造成身体伤害吗?

    山羊,不是山羊。 Goad 的意思是挑起某人做某事。 对于山羊的定义,请照照镜子!!!!!

    马太福音 15:24 !!!!!!

    • 回复: @Art
  235. @Svigor

    您忽略了:

    “孩子们,人类不是靠自己的奇思妙想或信仰来统治这个世界的。 上帝/自然(可与某些人互换,而不能与其他人互换)确实如此,而人类则反对他/它并骑马摔倒。 没有人知道这一切将如何动摇,但我会告诉你一些事情:

    1.你在这个世界上找到敌人的机会很高,你需要知道他们来的时候是谁,但没有必要努力创造比生活给你的更多。

    2. 你需要朋友,但“朋友”可能很危险。 无论你打什么战斗,你都会发现一些你真正希望/认为是/在另一方的战斗。

    狗屎即将击中风扇,不会有赢家,只有幸存者。 睁大眼睛,低头,闭上嘴,保持双手清洁。”

  236. Svigor 说:

    “犹太人得到了一个民族国家,非白人得到了事实上的民族国家,而白人得到了不同的 kumbayah 想要混合的国家。 期间,讨论结束。”

    由于南方人无法遵守普莱西的原则——隔离但平等的设施),美国公民根据社会契约和公共福利,作为多数人制定了立法,以确保政治和社会自由得到保障。

    通常的反人道主义,国家主义的鱿鱼墨水,多么原始:

    “政府强制的隔离不起作用,所以政府强制的‘整合’是唯一的选择。 哦,顺便说一句,这种反自由,这种政府压迫,应该被视为‘政治和社会自由。’”

    尽管有这些法律,今天的白人仍然能够搬进白人社区并专门与白人生活在一起。

    谎言。

    此外,欧洲各族群在抵达美国后相互混杂和通婚,这种行为在旧国家被视为禁忌。

    哈哈。 非白人讨厌欧洲多元化这一事实,而且长期以来一直如此,因此他们忽略了这一点。

    结果,出现了一个新的族群——美国人,他们长期选择“混合”人们。 同样,那些选择在特定人群中生活和工作的人有自己的选择。

    你说话像雨人。 我说一些相关的,你说无关紧要的废话。

    物种形成是由于地理隔离而产生新物种的过程,如泛大陆分离,隔离后来成为不同物种(喇嘛和骆驼)的各种物种,或生殖隔离,当生殖过程的差异将两个后来变得不同的群体分开时物种。 也就是说,如果人类是地球上孤立的种群,很可能会发生异域物种形成。

    太笨了,不知道在物种形成过程中亚种=种族=组。 太愚蠢了,无法理解所有物种都是从亚种开始的,也就是种族。

    你说过,在某种程度上。

    你默许了:你要工作 人性,因此是反人道主义的。

    你甚至懒得否认。

    你通过假设某些种族最适合或不适合特定的气质和能力来根据你自己的人性构成来判断你的立场。

    你假设他们没有,并否认人类有我提供给他们的一整套选择。 因为你是反人道主义的。

    你不否认。

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  237. Svigor 说:

    我:“自由。”

    妓女的肛门:“压迫。”

    非常简单

    • 回复: @marwan
  238. marwan 说:
    @Svigor

    看来好人今天已经成功地进入了你的皮肤,Alt 先生/白人民族主义者 !!!!!! 你已经完全精神错乱了。 也许去 Stormfront 或 VNN 会有助于降低你的血压!!!!

    • 回复: @nickels
  239. Junior [又名“ Jr.”] 说:
    @geokat62

    哇! 这是一封令人难以置信的写得好,有力的信。 我想和 Ofir 先生握手,让他写下它。

    感谢分享,geo。

  240. RobinG 说:
    @SolontoCroesus

    感谢您发布(在另一个线程上)您的建议。 我又看了一次 Wawro 的演讲——(两年前看过)——他真的挤了很多。你读过他的书吗,
    流沙:美国在中东的权力追求 ?
    “....Wawro 解决了编写美国参与中东的全面历史的艰巨挑战。 在许多方面试图解释美国目前所处困境的历史起源,作者的主要叙事线索是美国与以色列和沙特阿拉伯的复杂且经常发生冲突的关系。 他表示,其他所有事情,包括伊拉克和阿富汗战争以及与伊朗的长期紧张局势,在某种程度上都是这些以色列和沙特效忠的附带后果。 。” ——布伦丹·德里斯科尔

    又是这个链接 重新评估美以“特殊关系”的全国峰会 -

    Geoffrey Wawro-《流沙》一书中的主要发现

    • 回复: @annamaria
    , @SolontoCroesus
  241. Anonymous • 免责声明 说:
    @Maj. Kong

    不在乎有人是否反犹太。 抹黑破坏讨论和调查的日子已经一去不复返了。
    为什么讨厌“goyim 牛”的犹太复国主义敢死队没有名字,正如他们所说的那样? 或者是他们喜欢的侮辱“阿马雷克”或“魔像”? 长期受迫害的人有很多“他人”的仇恨标签; 但上帝会帮助那些称他们为任何东西的人——合法与否。
    Sayanim 的最新冒险并不太爱国,事实上,它在任何自由社会中都是危险和犯罪的,应该在法律允许的最大范围内通过大规模的集体诉讼起诉其罪犯——
    OPERATION CANARY MISSION,其中犹太复国主义部落团伙通过诽谤和诽谤他们的老板/同事来跟踪他们的目标,使他们被列入就业黑名单,或者如果他们被录取,联系他们的教授将他们从课堂上删除,或联系他们的社交圈诽谤他们,诽谤他们批评以色列。 有点像第二代 Campus Watch 写得很大。
    他们在他们的 Canary 网站上吹嘘自己在暗中操作以实施他们的以色列 SAYANIM 支持的黑名单。
    现在需要采取措施,起诉这个隐形黑手党,否则伤亡人员甚至不知道他们做了什么。

  242. Jay Igaboo 说:

    关于扼杀犹太游说团体(几乎所有犹太人都支持或默许)西方外交和国内政策的一篇很好的、证据确凿的文章。
    很可能不喜欢和谴责犹太人*的行为(就像我自己一样)并且对个别犹太人没有仇恨,但如果你以自己的名义这样做,在欧洲大部分地区就不可能避免被判入狱。
    我只遇到过一小部分人,他们并不过分物质主义,在大多数情况下都是贪得无厌的,他们乐于以对他们有利的蚂蚁方式搞砸goyim。
    二战是最令人震惊的例子,但进一步的细节可能会引发欧洲逮捕令的问题。
    犹太人在法律上和社会上都可以自由传播“仇恨”言论和种族主义指控,因为西方自由主义者对世界上最具种族主义色彩的任何批评的反应都是巴甫洛夫式的。

    *

  243. @RobinG

    感谢您发布 Wawro 视频。 他是一个勇敢的人,尤其是在他年轻的时候。 我认为像瓦罗这样的演讲者是从美国的角度来看待以色列游说团的问题,正如吉拉尔迪所暗示的那样,而不是巴勒斯坦人等。

    有趣的事实:Wawro 说 “在 1948 年的选举中,汤姆杜威坚定了支持以色列的立场,杜鲁门觉得他不能少。”
    Benzion Netanyahu 负责那块木板:犹太人一直是可靠的民主党人,但民主党人。 候选人不够柔韧。 Benzion 认为民主党人认为犹太人的投票是理所当然的,并开始向他们施加一点压力。
    自从 Benzion Netanyahu 在 1948 年的策略之后,双方都有了亲以色列的立场。

    当然,现在线条已经完全模糊了。 共和党犹太联盟几乎与犹太游说团体在民主党中拥有的任何工具一样强大。

  244. Clyde 说:
    @marwan

    你的帖子很有趣,而且很正确。 你正在通过简单的逻辑让那些讨厌 j-hate 的白痴难堪。 我也这样做,但不一样。 这里的大多数希特勒小我都太糟糕了,脑子太糊涂了,对以色列/犹太人的仇恨如此无能,以至于他们必须在 likudnik-hasabra 的工资单上。 传说中的 Hasbarist 名为 Tel-Aviv Steve,他在 Stormfront 拥有多个 ID,并让他们的摇头娃娃旋转。 也许他厌倦了那些笨手笨脚的工作 [电子邮件保护]

    • 回复: @Art
  245. Anonymous • 免责声明 说:

    在被占领土上建造定居点时大谈安全问题就像把你的孩子放在马路中间玩耍。 荒谬。 还应该记住,Trans Jordan 的创建,即巴勒斯坦 80% 的土地,从一开始就让犹太复国主义者感到被抢劫。 我们今天看到的以色列政策是他们发誓要扭转最初的背叛的结果。 他们只是想要更多的土地,圣经预言给他们的土地。 其他一切都是诡计

    • 回复: @SILVERSTREAK
  246. 考虑到犹太人在色情行业的众所周知的主导地位,马尔旺对性相关言论的痴迷是显而易见的。

  247. Corvinus 说:
    @Svigor

    我更喜欢辩证的路线,但既然你坚持修辞……

    “通常的反人道主义、国家主义的鱿鱼墨水,多么原始。”

    原创和事实。 看,美国人民集体决定确保所有公民的政治平等。 这就是代议制民主的设计方式。

    我——“尽管有这些法律,但今天的白人能够搬进白人社区,并且只与白人住在一起。”

    你撒谎。” 您是否否认明显正确的事情,即美国有些地区完全是白人?

    “我说些相关的话,你说些无关紧要的废话。”

    你将不得不通过解释我的陈述完全无关的内容来加强你的游戏。

    “太愚蠢了,不知道在物种形成过程中亚种=种族=群体。”

    很大程度上取决于你问的是谁。 一些遗传学家说是,另一些说不。 选择任何一种立场,你都会找到文献来捍卫它/

    亚种是由表型差异(外观/生物学差异)定义的,而不是 DNA(基因型)的百分比差异量 - 因此,如果使用方式与使用方式相同,亚种/种族的经典定义将适用于人类在其他物种上。

    “你想违背人性,因此是一个反人道主义者。”



    假设你对人性的哲学思考。

  248. nickels 说:
    @marwan

    嘲弄。

    有些人在二年级就通过了它。

    对于其他人来说,我猜这是遗传因素。 一种刻板印象。

    如果我记得那与罗马人将寺庙粉碎成遗忘有关。

  249. Svigor 说:

    妓女的肛门不能用柔道翻转我说:

    “我比你更支持自由和人类幸福,因为我支持为人类提供更广泛的追求幸福和自决的选择。 我的方式更好,因为它不仅为 Kumbayah Race-Mixers 提供了前进的道路,也为民族中心主义者和地狱以及其他所有人提供了前进的道路。 自由和自决不是很好的想法吗?”

    因为他不相信这些。 对他来说,这是他的方式或高速公路。

    • 回复: @Corvinus
  250. Art 说:
    @Clyde

    你让那些讨厌 j-hate 的白痴难堪...... yada ... yada ... yada

    是的,克莱德——这是真的——受害者是犹太人的第一个、最后一个也是唯一的避难所。

    大犹太人偷窃——当该付钱给吹笛者的时候,小犹太人成为受害者——艺术

    • 回复: @Clyde
  251. Art 说:
    @marwan

    是的 - 应该是刺激 - 不是山羊 - 谢谢你的更正。

    ps我喜欢山羊——他们总是试图达到最高点。

  252. blu 说:

    这是第二次美国革命,这就是它的运作方式……

    犹太教坚持犹太复国主义,
    就像以色列坚持种族隔离,
    就像希拉里坚持萨班/AIPAC
    像卢比奥/克鲁兹/布什一样坚持阿德尔森

    检查伙伴:“以色列人实行的犹太复国主义”、种族隔离国家本身、AIPAC、希拉里、卢比奥/克鲁兹/布什等

    就像登山者都用绳索一起穿过裂缝一样,他们都一起往下走…… 邮编邮编邮编邮编邮编!

    这是怎么发生的?

    美国支持以色列种族隔离的以色列游说团/犹太游说团不被允许从种族隔离/比比政府的推翻中分离(并且不能分离),他们被卡住并紧紧抓住种族隔离

    以色列定居者国家被以色列游说的大钱(阿德尔森,甚至希拉里的萨班等)困住了,这是美国侨民内部的一场内战,因为那些知道种族隔离正在崩溃的人试图拼命将其切断,而大锡安钱迫使它的傀儡(希拉里、克鲁兹、卢比奥等)试图阻止海啸

    还有以色列内战,定居者国家(定居者以色列国防军和山顶以色列国防军)反对独联体以色列安全指挥官和少数以色列“左翼”平民。 这只是在表面之下,也正在爆发 - 独联体迫使最后一次选举,尽管现在即使赫尔佐格也试图向右跳,因为即将到来的联合国安理会针对以色列的决议落下美国支持的长矛(弃权)

    以色列自己认为已经发生或正在成功发生的三个存在事件:

    1- 伊朗核协议 14 年 2016 月 XNUMX 日
    2- 迫在眉睫的联合国安理会针对以色列的决议落空了美国的支持(弃权)
    3- 成功推进针对以色列的国际刑事法院案件(通过保护边缘行动等)——被以色列顶级法律团队 Col Liron Libman 称为“维基解密大使馆电报”,称其“站不住脚”和“存在主义”

    我们正在与正在崩溃的以色列种族隔离制度相同的袋子里拆除美国的以色列游说团/犹太游说团。

    以色列游说团/犹太游说团在美国不再站得住脚——

    首先,我们将 AIPAC 注册为外国政府的代理人,然后将其作为第一名众议员 Jane Harman 已完成的犯罪行为定为非法*,见下文,国会与 Bibi 的针对美国的政变(均由 NSA 记录)的勾结更加显眼。

    众议员 Jane Harman 因与 NSA/FBI 勾结窃听 Haim Saban/Jane Harman 的电话而“完成犯罪”(FBI 记录在案),在电话中她同意“蹒跚”以破坏 AIPAC 对 Pres Steve Rosen 的间谍审判和副总裁 Kenneth Weissman – Jane 尚未因此被起诉,因为 FBI 记录在案,称 Jane 的“犯罪已完成”。 主流媒体报道 Jeff Stein/Congressional Quarterly 等

    然后美国通过了禁止 AIPAC 的第 28 条修正案

    这是一个大包,我们把它们放在一起——以色列游说团、AIPAC、以色列种族隔离和美国国会参与了比比去年秋天夏天就伊朗协议对美国进行的政变(可以克服即将到来的联合国安理会反对以色列)——包括希拉里

    这是第二次美国革命——没有以色列游说的美国

    吻——
    1- 上述针对 AIPAC 的行动与尚未被起诉的 Jane Harman、Steve Rosen、Kenneth Weissman
    2- 28 th 修正案废除以色列和所有其他外国政府在 AIPAC 中的参与,如政治腐败/“游说”——由于参与罗森/魏斯曼/哈曼间谍活动和联邦审判脱轨而废除了 AIPAC
    3- 羞辱 - 羞辱 - 美国侨民/以色列大厅中的任何人仍然支持种族隔离以色列或 AIPAC 针对美国政府的行动

    • 回复: @marwan
    , @Clyde
  253. marwan 说:
    @blu

    恭喜!!!!
    你赢得了年度最混乱和最复杂的职位,对抗激烈的竞争同样如此。 戴上你的铝箔帽子,用光明会和大灰人的故事来娱乐我们!!!!!

    • 回复: @geokat62
  254. Priss Factor [又名“多米尼克·弗兰肯学会”] 说: • 您的网站
    @rvg

    犹太人正在打开大门,并告诉白人闭嘴。

  255. Clyde 说:
    @Art

    你让世界各地的犹太人憎恨者感到尴尬。 希特勒会把你放逐到东线。

  256. Clyde 说:
    @blu

    检查伙伴:“以色列人实行的犹太复国主义”、种族隔离国家本身、AIPAC、希拉里、卢比奥/克鲁兹/布什等

    傻孩子! 你必须得到报酬。 哪个穆斯林国家不是种族隔离国家? 只有 Hasbara 操作有足够的时间来输入这种不连贯的愚蠢。 只有 Rehamat 打败了你。

  257. geokat62 说:
    @marwan

    我同意应该祝贺蓝光。 但它是为了提醒我们所有人前国会女议员简·哈曼的叛国行为。

    CQ 的杰夫·斯坦 (Jeff Stein) 报道说,哈曼被窃听发现,同意“涉足”对 AIPAC 官员的刑事起诉,但 AG Alberto Gonzales 保护了她。 祝你好运找到原始文章。 如果我没记错的话,就像美国签署谅解备忘录的重磅炸弹故事一样,国家安全局与以色列分享原始情报(包括美国人的数据),这个故事也被认为没有足够的新闻价值,无法在主要 MSM 媒体的头版上发表网点,例如 NYT 或 WaPo。

    这是艾莉森·威尔为 Counterpunch 写的文章:

    [更多]

    简·哈曼和以色列间谍

    令人震惊的是,在大卫·彼得雷乌斯将军倒台后,为数不多的成为中央情报局局长的候选人之一据报道与 2005 年的以色列间谍丑闻有牵连。

    CNN、Politico 和其他公司都将前国会女议员 Jane Harman 列为潜在的新中央情报局局长。 然而,奇怪的是,没有人提到 2006 年和 2009 年的报道称,2005 年美国国家安全局的一次窃听窃听了哈曼,哈曼向一名疑似以色列特工承诺,她将代表以色列帮助被指控从事间谍活动的人。

    据报道,哈曼据称告诉以色列特工,她将游说司法部,以减少对强大的以色列游说组织美国以色列公共事务委员会(AIPAC)的两名高级官员的间谍相关指控。

    作为回报,据报道,这名疑似以色列特工(可能是双重国籍的美国人)承诺帮助游说哈曼成为众议院情报委员会主席。 哈曼已经是委员会中排名靠前的民主党人。

    据报道,在谈话结束时,哈曼说:“这段谈话不存在。”

    两名 AIPAC 官员因非法获取有关伊朗的机密文件并将其传递给以色列而被起诉。 他们还将它们交给了著名的华盛顿邮报记者格伦凯斯勒,他的演讲者简历列出了三个主题:“全球事务、犹太人利益、中东问题”。

    其中一名被起诉的 AIPAC 官员为自己辩护,称他的行为是 AIPAC 的例行公事——AIPAC 工作人员定期获取美国机密信息并将其交给以色列和其他国家。

    AIPAC 担心起诉书会引起公众曝光,因此解雇了这两名男子。 随后关于他们被解雇的诉讼提供了大量信息,从关于 AIPAC 高级官员的肮脏细节到数十名 AIPAC 捐助者向这两人提供资金援助的事实,尽管有证据表明他们已将美国机密文件泄露给外国。

    这些捐助者包括 Slim-Fast 亿万富翁 Daniel Abraham、慈善家 Lynn Schusterman 和以色列裔美国人 Haim Saban,他是民主党候选人的主要捐助者之一。 与哈曼关系密切的萨班说,他“最关心的是保护以色列”。 (他的妻子最近被提名为美国驻联合国大使。)

    哈曼经常在 AIPAC 活动中发言,她以强烈倡导以色列和代表以色列发动中东战争而广为人知。

    她支持对伊拉克的袭击,现在同样坚持认为伊朗对美国人构成威胁,尽管伊拉克很快变成了一场悲惨的、不必要的、代价高昂的灾难; 伊拉克没有声称拥有的任何大规模杀伤性武器; 并且目前对伊朗的索赔同样微不足道。

    犹太前锋称她为“亲以色列的坚定支持者”,而犹太电报社 (JTA) 报道称,“哈曼深受亲以色列游说团体的喜爱,并且肯定会出现在美国以色列公共事务委员会的年度政策会议上。”

    根据公开的秘密,哈曼是亲以色列竞选捐款的最大接受者之一。

    JTA 报道说,她于 20011 年离开国会,“让她从 AIPAC 主任霍华德科尔那里获得了异常热情的遗憾声明。”

    与 AIPAC 一样,哈曼目前推动所谓的需求,通常由有缺陷的媒体报道推动,要求美国解决她声称的伊朗发展核武器的问题,尽管美国情报机构继续发现伊朗实际上并没有发展核武器。 (她也没有提到以色列拥有核武器储备并且拒绝签署核不扩散条约)。

    在国会九个任期内,哈曼专注于军事和安全事务,并在所有主要安全委员会任职:六年的武装部队、八年的情报部门和四年的国土安全部。

    哈曼与亿万富翁、新闻周刊的所有者西德尼哈曼结婚,直到他去年去世,被列为国会第二富有的成员。

    哈曼于 20011 年从国会辞职,领导华盛顿特区伍德罗威尔逊中心,这是史密森学会的一部分。 威尔逊中心被列为全球第 16 大最具影响力的智库。

    与哈曼一样,威尔逊中心的长期主席约瑟夫·吉尔登霍恩 (Joseph B. Gildenhorn) 与以色列极为亲近。 他资助了马里兰大学以色列研究所,曾一度可能是 AIPAC 的董事会成员。 威尔逊联合主席 Sander R. Gerber 多年来一直是 AIPAC 董事会成员。

    在解释她离开国会以领导威尔逊中心的决定时,哈曼说:“担任其掌舵人提供了独特的机会,让众议院和参议院、顶级专家和世界领导人参与关于最紧迫的外国和国内问题的‘大辩论’”。政策很重要。”

    虽然国会季刊的点名投票包含一篇哈曼否认与间谍活动有关的报道的文章,但该出版物似乎已经删除了哈曼正在回应的报告以及许多其他文章的链接:“来源:窃听记录的众议员哈曼承诺干预为 AIPAC”,Jeff Stein,《国会季刊》,19 年 2009 月 XNUMX 日。(尚不清楚 Stein 的文章被删除是否与故事爆发三个月后国会季刊被经济学人集团收购的事实有关。)

    在报告中,调查记者杰夫·斯坦 (Jeff Stein) 提供了有关该事件的更多细节,并解释说,无论哈曼是否兑现了她的承诺(她没有获得她想要的主席职位),从法律上讲,做出承诺都足以构成“完成了犯罪。”

    尽管引起了强烈抗议并要求司法部进行调查,但哈曼躲过了起诉,对这位强大的南加州民主党人预期的全面调查从未发生,而且哈曼据称的颠覆行动似乎已经消失了。

    虽然前彼得雷乌斯副手(现任代理导演)迈克尔 J.莫雷尔似乎是现任中央情报局局长的领跑者,但据报道,哈曼和其他人仍在竞选中。 此外,莫雷尔可能会被证明是一个临时选择,以防止在选择长期董事时领导层失效。

    如果哈曼真的成为中央情报局局长,她的任命无疑会受到以色列政府的欢呼。 无论哈曼是否向以色列特工做出叛国承诺,毫无疑问,她都是以色列政权的忠实拥护者。

    另一方面,美国人可能没有那么高兴的理由。

    http://www.counterpunch.org/2012/11/14/jane-harmon-and-israeli-spying/

    • 回复: @anonymous
  258. anonymous • 免责声明 说:
    @geokat62

    进一步支持本文中心的想法——

    哈曼现在是美国纳税人资助的伍德罗威尔逊中心的主任,在那里她控制着美国人学习的威尔逊的历史,并在讨论以色列有多好,虽然邪恶的人压迫犹太人,以及有多邪恶的小组讨论后,用纳税人的钱在会议后举行研讨会各种其他民族,尤其是巴勒斯坦人、真主党、哈马斯和伊朗。
    ^^^^^
    美国人民资助了另一位犹太人杰弗里·罗森(Jeffrey Rosen),他是费城纳税人资助的国家宪法中心的主任。
    ^^^^^
    美国犹太历史国家博物馆位于宾夕法尼亚州费城的自由钟对面。

    没有哪个州可以有太多的犹太人博物馆。 除了美国的 145 个全息博物馆外,全世界大约有 50 个全息博物馆。

  259. geokat62 说:

    夜花最新阴谋:

    奥巴马签署 AIPAC 推动的贸易法案,使以色列占领合法化并打击 BDS

    昨天,参议院以 2015 票对 75 票否决权通过了《20 年贸易便利化和贸易执法法案》。 大型贸易政策法案包括由 AIPAC 推动的反 BDS 贸易立法,并通过将所有“以色列控制的领土”纳入以色列的一部分来引入新的美国政策语言。

    http://mondoweiss.net/2016/02/obama-to-sign-aipac-promoted-trade-bill-that-legitimizes-israeli-occupation-and-fights-bds/

  260. delia ruhe 说:
    @marwan

    嘿,Marwan,那是因为你没有在看。 谷歌它,fercrissake!

  261. Svigor 说:

    啊原来是这样 民主 那个妓女的肛门崇拜。

    什么时候 民主 决定奴隶制是好的,然后妓女的肛门同意,这很好。
    什么时候 民主 决定隔离是好的,然后妓女的肛门同意,这很好。
    什么时候 民主 决定取代 Amerinds 是好的,然后妓女的肛门同意,这很好。

    而且,如果 民主 决定将妓女的肛门运到古拉格,然后妓女的肛门会同意,这很好。

    或者也许妓女的肛门不在乎 民主,或者,他只是在他喜欢的现状中使用力量来纠正。

    就像我一直在说的那样。

    有趣的是,左派是如何热爱民主的,这是一个有着无数年历史的机构,51% 的人强迫其他 49% 的人继续……只要左派分子碰巧在 51% 中,无论如何。

    民主是农业经济时代的过时遗物,通信需要数月或数年才能跨越全球,但左派坚持民主——虽然他们有优势,但在寡头资金的帮助下——因为它允许他们强迫不情愿的人一起去。 我们现在可以做得更好;通过现代通信和信息分类,我们可以沿着自我分类、自我决定和点菜管理的路线做更多的事情,但这对左翼的卢德分子来说都是希腊式的。

    • 回复: @Corvinus
    , @OLD JEW
  262. Svigor 说:

    比如说,你要多关注涌入美国、加拿大和澳大利亚等国家的成群结队的中国人、印度人、黑人和穆斯林,而不是那里的少量犹太人。

    这就是犹太人首先撬开边界的目标:所以他们总是可以说“看,一只松鼠”,这样没有人会注意到他们的渎职行为。 顺便说一句,这根本不是种族主义(针对他们进口/指责的更明显的少数族裔),因为犹太人总是dindunuffins。

  263. Svigor 说:

    我有一个框架——以你希望被对待的方式对待他人。

    我知道了。 所以,如果大多数人反对你,当它开始压迫时你不会抱怨 的课 喜欢的权利。 明白了。

  264. Corvinus 说:
    @Svigor

    “因为他不相信这些。 对他来说,这是他的方式或高速公路”

    现在你只是在投射。

  265. Corvinus 说:
    @Svigor

    “当民主决定奴隶制是好的时,妓女的肛门也同意,这很好。”

    奴隶制与民主无关。

    “当民主决定隔离是好的时,妓女的肛门同意,这很好。”

    种族隔离从来都不是民主。

    “当民主决定取代美洲印第安人是好的,然后妓女的肛门同意,这很好。”

    民主并没有取代美洲原住民,而是欧洲人。 这并不奇怪,因为在整个人类历史上,群体相互取代。

    “如果民主决定妓女的肛门应该被运往古拉格”

    那将是法西斯主义,而不是民主。

    “一个有着无数年历史的机构,51% 的人强迫其他 49% 的人继续……只要左派碰巧在 51% 中,无论如何。”

    它被称为通过社会契约的代表制的多数规则。 在民主制度中,没有人是真正自由的,也没有人是完全快乐的,因为公民对某事的偏好永远不会得到明确的实现。

    “我们现在可以做得更好;借助现代通信和信息分类,我们可以在自我分类和自决以及点菜治理方面做得更多。”

    这个“我们”是谁?

    • 回复: @Beefcake the Mighty
  266. OLD JEW 说:
    @Svigor

    威格

    你不在我身边。

    尽管如此,您还是一位高效而敏锐的战斗员。

    我很佩服你。

    而且你可以学习。

    Mathias Corvinus 或 Matei Corvin(我们罗马尼亚人称他为)是一位著名的匈牙利国王。

    AnaMarina 显然拼错了化名。 你跳上诱饵,叫你的对手:Carv-Anus。

    它贬低你。

  267. @Corvinus

    那么,可能使正义只是人类历史的一部分,但我们要谴责法西斯主义吗? 就像我说的,以色列人需要要求退还他们的钱。

  268. KA 说:

    这个人 Yalom 再次出现在那里,试图让人类忘记他是一个多么卑鄙的人以及他的同伙

    “亚阿隆拒绝了沙特王子的言论,称巴以冲突与中东其他地区当前的问题之间没有联系。 “与巴勒斯坦人发生冲突——但这与伊朗革命之间有什么联系? ISIS [伊斯兰国组织] 与冲突有关? 叙利亚内战还是突尼斯起义? 也门或伊拉克局势? 没有联系。”

    http://www.haaretz.com/misc/article-print-page/.premium-1.703206

    污秽不知道相互关联的事件是什么意思,续集是什么意思,说因果是什么意思。
    但他的拉比教他如何将“占领运动”的抗议归咎于 18 世纪的反犹太主义

  269. RobinG 说:
    @alexander

    全国游行支持巴勒斯坦和抗议 AIPAC
    20 月 12 日,星期日,美国东部时间下午 00:5 – 下午 00:XNUMX –

    菲尔受邀在本次活动中发言。 你会加入我们吗?

    Al-Awda、巴勒斯坦回归权利联盟和 ANSWER 联盟正在共同发起支持巴勒斯坦和抗议 AIPAC 的全国游行。 我们期待数百个组织和个人领导人认可这项活动并共同努力!

    中午 12 点:在白宫集合
    下午 1 点至 5 点:三月前往华盛顿特区会议中心
    .

  270. Gabriel 说:

    这一切都在圣经的启示录(圣约翰启示录)中。 这些人统称为野兽,他们的老板是龙撒旦。 最后,他们被扔进火湖里,永永远远日夜受折磨(19-20章)。

    PS:美国是妓女,妓女巴比伦,野兽的婊子,当她不再对他有用时就会被摧毁(第17章15、18章)。

    宽慰的是,正义最终会得到伸张。

  271. KA 说:

    “正如我们所指出的,法国犹太社区 CRIF 伞式组织的首席律师 Pascal Markowicz 发布了这一庆祝法令(强调原文):“BDS 在法国是非法的。” 他补充说,主张抵制或制裁的声明“是完全非法的。 如果 [BDS 活动家] 说他们的言论自由受到侵犯,现在法国最高司法机关会作出相反的裁决。” 去年在加拿大,官员威胁要对任何支持抵制以色列的人提起刑事诉讼。

    在美国,很多人都不知道,对这种激进主义有类似的立法禁令,而一项未决的法案将加强对 BDS 的取缔。 正如华盛顿邮报去年 XNUMX 月报道的那样,“一波反 BDS 立法正在席卷美国” 国会中的许多法案鼓励或要求国家采取行动打击 BDS。

    Eyal Press 上个月在《纽约时报》的一篇必读专栏文章中警告说,根据国会两院通过并前往白宫的关税法案,“美国官员未来将有义务将这些定居点视为以色列的一部分。贸易谈判”,这是一项专门设计的条款,旨在“打击抵制、撤资和制裁运动,这是一场草根运动”。 但正如 Press 指出的那样,根据几乎从未讨论过的现行法律,“华盛顿已经禁止美国公司与国家主导的以色列抵制活动合作。”

    https://theintercept.com/2016/02/16/greatest-threat-to-free-speech-in-the-west-criminalizing-activism-against-israeli-occupation/

  272. Sasha 说:
    @Mark Green

    哇,很棒的评论。 几乎是整篇文章! 完全同意你说的一切,而且结构非常好。 干杯!

  273. bunga 说:
    @marwan

    伊斯兰主义的印度尼西亚政府没有杀死 500,000 万苏哈托政权策划的反共大屠杀,杀死了中国人,而是相当数量的受过教育的穆斯林和大量穆斯林农民。 在中央情报局的全力帮助下,他这样做了,就像刚果对帕特里克·卢蒙巴所做的那样
    他推翻了苏科尔诺
    谁从政权更迭中受益?

    美国公司和中国企业类。 以色列曾与凶残的反伊斯兰政权建立外交关系。
    中国基督徒反对荷兰殖民的独立运动。 在荷兰,可以看到一些印尼侨民,他们都是基督徒。
    在苏哈托被废黜后,伊斯兰教宣称收回了这个国家。

  274. bunga 说:
    @Corvinus

    “作为一个非犹太人,你真的无能为力去抵制他们所谓的全球影响力吗?
    要求媒体报道谢尔顿购买共和党候选人并举行预选会议的兴趣是什么?
    你会看到很多无能为力的走路和演讲。

  275. [评论中的大写是喊叫。 别喊了,否则你以后的所有评论都将被废弃。]

    为什么瑞典人要花这么长时间才能了解常见的男人和女人很久以前就学过的东西。

    这位特别的作家应该查找 NATHANIEL KEPNER 弟兄的网站,他的网站是真正的犹太人新闻,或者查看 JEW 手表,当您有公开的笔和对 EXPS 的修订平台时,他或她可以在游戏之前移动特别是就是这样,越多的人意识到这个巨大的欺骗,其余的人类就能越快地将这个不法和不虔诚的部落带到脚后跟

  276. @Anonymous

    Dumpster McAine,你要明白这些自称犹太人的渣滓不是“圣经希伯来人”。

    罗马人一旦决定摧毁以色列,就永远不会带走这些人渣袋子,因为耶稣基督告诉他们这将发生,

    摩萨德是希伯来人反对罗马人的最后一个立场,罗马人将他们全部杀死。 唯一逃脱的是那些已经接受基督与他的追随者分享救恩信息的希伯来人,上帝在公元 50 年将他们赶出去或以色列。 在公元 20 年发生的破坏之前的 70 年。

    但是那些逃脱的希伯来人从来没有称自己为犹太人,从那时起他们就被称为基督徒,因为他们和基督一起见过他们,因为信徒开始称他们为基督徒,但即使是基督也没有告诉我们我们应该被称为“克里斯特里夫”基督的信息” 男人是那些用头衔来表明自己是基督徒或浸信会等的人。 那些只是标签,是为了把我们放在一个盒子里而由男人制作的。 但我们不属于一个盒子里,我们被赋予“像风一样自由”的上帝精神。 人类已经使用标签将我们奴役在一个建筑物中,他们可以成为 TYS 的寄生虫,并告诉信徒,如果他们离开指定的教会,那么他们就会叛逆上帝的精神,而我们需要得到他们的认可,基督不是告诉我们我们都是他的仆人吗?

    一旦犹太人渗透到他们创建的许多教派中,通过使所谓的犹太人成为“蒙拣选的人”,如果他们愿意的话,就可以将信徒灌输成为上帝王国的二等公民并使新约的信徒成为上帝所拣选的人,使信徒成为根据新约和旧约被上帝自己修改​​的选民。

    这就是关于这些罪犯崇拜撒旦的整个欺骗的全部内容,他们的塔木德是他们仇恨宗教的证据,就像撒旦对耶稣基督的仇恨一样

    • 回复: @RobinG
  277. RobinG 说:
    @SILVERSTREAK

    解锁你的大写字母,伙计! 我们不会在这里读到疯狂的尖叫者。

  278. Anonymous • 免责声明 说: • 您的网站

    Tedcar.wordpress.com...

    犹太人把西方扼在喉咙里,这并不夸张。

    西方情报机构的所有首席执行官都是犹太人。军情五处的帕克只是一个例子。
    军情五处渗透并扰乱犹太人尚未控制的任何政党。
    卡梅伦是犹太人……科尔宾也是犹太人,伦敦市长鲍里斯约翰逊也是。

    卡梅伦的“有限聚会”是他有一半的犹太人血统,并且与犹太人有模糊的联系……当然完全是胡说八道。(见 15 世纪西班牙/马拉诺/新基督教徒/加密犹太人。)

  279. Anonymous • 免责声明 说:
    @marwan

    中国人、土耳其人和印度尼西亚人无法控制英国政府,你这个犹太人混蛋©。

  280. Anonymous • 免责声明 说:

    我认为,也许,对以色列的要求不高……它有“和平计划”吗?

    这个星球上的任何(和所有)国家,处于战争状态,难道我们不应该要求提出一种符合国际法的解决自身冲突的形式吗?

    如果是这样……那么以色列的和平计划在哪里?

    它看起来像什么? .. .它看起来像什么?

    吉拉尔迪先生,假设您正在与敌人交战,而敌人已经接受了所有国际授权的冲突决议……而您没有接受。

    http://www.newsbbc.net/2016/03/clinton-on-defensive-in-flint.html

    你的敌人(接受世界和平条款的人)怎么可能是等式中的恐怖组织……而不是你?以色列在向世界推销其“反恐战争”方面做了大量工作,但缺席一个可行的和平计划(以及实施的意愿)……在“恐怖分子”的标签之前,正确地,也许是他自己的父亲。

  281. @Maj. Kong

    哇哇哇哇!

    另一种偏离主题的努力——这是以色列的罪行,以及对许多西方国家大众媒体的控制。

    犹太人在几个国家的人口不到 3%,但拥有/管理的远不止于此。

    它开始看起来是故意的、有计划的和阴险的。

  282. Anonymous [AKA "Ross Taylor"] 说:

    我认为,也许,对以色列的要求不高……它有“和平计划”吗?

    这个星球上的任何(和所有)国家,处于战争状态,难道我们不应该要求提出一种符合国际法的解决自身冲突的形式吗?

    如果是这样……那么以色列的和平计划在哪里?

    它看起来像什么? .. .它看起来像什么?

    吉拉尔迪先生,假设您正在与敌人交战,而敌人已经接受了所有国际授权的冲突决议……而您没有接受。

    http://conspiracynews.in/mike-pence-accuses-china-not-russia-of-trying-to-interfere-in-us-elections/

    你的敌人(接受世界和平条款的人)怎么可能是等式中的恐怖组织……而不是你?以色列在向世界推销其“反恐战争”方面做了大量工作,但缺席一个可行的和平计划(以及实施的意愿)……在“恐怖分子”的标签之前,正确地,也许是他自己的父亲。

当前评论者
说:

发表评论 -


 记得 我的信息为什么?
 电子邮件回复我的评论
$
提交的评论已被许可给 Unz评论 并可以由后者自行决定在其他地方重新发布
在翻译模式下禁用评论
通过RSS订阅此评论主题 通过RSS订阅所有Philip Giraldi的评论
Personal 古典文学
他们在与中东打交道时不应该退缩吗?
华盛顿启用的现代格尔尼卡
在提名候选人之前给候选人施加压力
但是它甚至是朋友吗?
今天的中央情报局是为承包商和官僚服务的,而不是为国家服务的。