Unz评论•另类媒体选择$
美国主流媒体大都排除了有趣,重要和有争议的观点
 博客浏览约瑟夫·索伯伦(Joseph Sobran)档案
我见过的吉姆·韦伯
通过电子邮件将此页面发送给其他人

 记住我的信息



=>

书签 全部切换总目录添加到图书馆从图书馆中删除 • B
显示评论下一个新评论下一个新回复了解更多
回复同意/不同意/等等 更多... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
同意不同意谢谢LOL轮唱
这些按钮可将您的公开协议,异议,感谢,LOL或巨魔与所选注释一起注册。 仅对最近使用“记住我的信息”复选框保存姓名和电子邮件的频繁评论者可用,并且在任何八个小时的时间内也只能使用三次。
忽略评论者 关注评论者
搜寻文字 区分大小写  确切的词  包括评论
列表 书签

The columnist George Will, who would probably stand out for prissy pomposity at a nudist colony, with or without his bow tie, is not, shall we say, crippled by a sense of irony about himself. He has accused Virginia’s senator-elect, Jim Webb, of being “a pompous poseur and an abuser of the English language,” as well as “a boor.”

Will points out that Webb has used the word 从字面上 when he meant figuratively. True, and certainly deplorable; but Will’s own habitual confusion of the auxiliary verbs 五月可能 would have provoked Samuel Johnson to give him a good bitch-slap, if I know Dr. Johnson.

And, in one incoherent cheap shot worthy of a first-year philosophy student after a couple of Budweisers, Will recently charged Thomas Aquinas with “intellectual hijacking” for the crime of quoting Aristotle. He might as well have accused Aquinas of copyright violation or identity theft. I guess nobody had explained to Will that medieval Christian thinkers often turned to ancient pagan philosophers in their attempts to formulate the presuppositions of Christian doctrine, as St. Augustine and others had turned to Plato. It would be naive to sever theology from philosophy. Will also finds Webb guilty of “cavalier historical judgments,” but let that pass, along with Will’s subtle contempt for Christianity.

So how did Webb get under Will’s skin? Well, Webb is a “boor,” it seems, because he was slightly rude to President Bush at a recent White House reception. This moved Will, his sense of irony failing him yet again, to complain about people who are “insufferably full of themselves.” Well, Webb considers it boorish to invade countries without justification, an act for which Will has never faulted Bush’s manners, just as he has never singled out Bush, despite many opportunities, as an egregious “abuser of the English language.” In fact, methinks Will would like his readers to forget that he himself originally favored war on Iraq, back when he was hard to distinguish from the neoconservative hawks from whom he is now eager to distinguish himself.

Will has another good point, however, when he faults Webb for finding today’s America insufficiently egalitarian. A country where George W. Bush can graduate from an Ivy League university has surely taken equality plenty far enough. Even nudist colonies have lowered their admissions standards, I suspect, but this is a question I leave for another day. Right now it would take us too far afield.

Webb got elected because, whatever his offenses against the English language, he opposed Bush’s war and, unlike his opponent, avoided outraging the macaca community. I had lunch with him once, about 15 years ago, when we both opposed the senior Bush’s Iraq war, and I liked him enormously. I especially remember his candid remarks about “Colin” (Powell), perceptive, respectful, almost affectionate, but without illusion. Everything I’ve learned about Powell since has confirmed them. And, incidentally, confirmed my respect for Jim Webb.

Webb was a real conservative who didn’t follow any party line. Now that he is a Democrat, he may have made some regrettable compromises, but he remains a real maverick, a breed Washington is in no imminent danger of being overrun by.

In Washington, everyone covets the reputation of being a maverick, precisely because the genuine article is so rare. George Will thinks of himself as a maverick, though it is hard to imagine him taking any position that might jeopardize his hard-won status among our Olympian talking heads. Naturally, honest mavericks like Webb shame and annoy him by refusing to play it safe by playing ball with the powers that be. I only hope Webb will have the strength to remain a free spirit under all the capital’s pressures to conform.

Washington is not a city to which martyrs flock in large numbers, and even most of the pundits are politicians at heart. But there are honorable exceptions, such as Mark Shields. Though we aren’t chums, I have known Shields for many years and observed him closely; and though he is discreet about sensitive topics (a man must live, after all), I can’t imagine him saying anything pompous, hypocritical, or insincere.

Regardless of our differences, I would trust Shields or Webb to be honest if my life were at stake. What more can you ask of a man in this town?

(从重新发布 索伯兰的 经作者或代表的许可)
 
当前评论者
说:

发表评论-对超过两周的文章发表评论,将在质量和语气上进行更严格的判断


 记得 我的信息为什么?
 电子邮件回复我的评论
$
提交的评论已被许可给 Unz评论 并可以由后者自行决定在其他地方重新发布
在翻译模式下禁用评论
通过RSS订阅此评论主题 通过RSS订阅所有约瑟夫·索伯伦评论