Unz评论•另类媒体选择$
美国主流媒体大都排除了有趣,重要和有争议的观点
 博客浏览罗恩·保罗档案馆
特朗普关于叙利亚撤军的触发器。 再次。
通过电子邮件将此页面发送给其他人

 记住我的信息



=>

书签 全部切换总目录添加到图书馆从图书馆中删除 • B
显示评论下一个新评论下一个新回复了解更多
回复同意/不同意/等等 更多... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
同意不同意谢谢LOL轮唱
这些按钮可将您的公开协议,异议,感谢,LOL或巨魔与所选注释一起注册。 仅对最近使用“记住我的信息”复选框保存姓名和电子邮件的频繁评论者可用,并且在任何八个小时的时间内也只能使用三次。
忽略评论者 关注评论者
搜寻文字 区分大小写  确切的词  包括评论
列表 书签

President Trump is reversing his foreign policy decisions so quickly these days that it almost seems like he overturns himself before making the decision in the first place. Last week he was very clear that the US was pulling its troops out of Syria. “Bringing soldiers home,” he said. “Let someone else fight over this long-bloodstained sand.”

But then he overturned himself later in the same speech. He said: “We’ve secured the oil and therefore a small number of US troops will remain in the area where they have the oil. And we’re going to be protecting it and we’ll be deciding what we’re going to do with it in the future.”

Where does President Trump think he gets the legal or moral authority to send US troops to illegally occupy foreign territory and determine what that foreign country can or cannot do with its resources? After eight years of Obama’s disastrous “Assad must go” policy, during which the US provided weapons and training to radicals and terrorists with a half million people killed as a result, President Trump had the opportunity to finally close that dark chapter of US foreign policy so the Syrian people could rebuild their country.

Instead he sat down on Thursday with Senator Lindsey Graham, who has been wrong in every foreign policy position he’s ever taken, and decided to follow Graham’s advice to take Syria’s oil. Even though Trump himself has said many times that ISIS is 100 percent defeated, he claims we must take Syria’s oil to keep it from ISIS.

The real reason the neocons want the US military to occupy Syria’s oil fields is they are still convinced they can overthrow Assad by carving out eastern Syria for the Kurds. They don’t want to keep the oil from ISIS, they want to keep it from the Syrian government. They don’t want the oil revenue to be used to help rebuild the country because they still want to make life more unbearable for the population through sanctions so they will overthrow Assad. They don’t care how many innocent civilians die.

So instead of bringing the troops home like he promised, President Trump has allowed himself to be convinced to actually expand the US presence in eastern Syria! Instead of ending a foolish mission, he’s giving them an even more foolish mission – and sending in more troops and weapons. Instead of removing the approximately 200 troops in that region as promised, Trump is going to add more troops to equal about a thousand. He’s also sending in tanks and other armored vehicles, according to the Pentagon.

If President Trump believes following neocon advice on Syria is going to produce results different than the past eight years of following neocon advice on Syria, he’s naïve or worse. This new mission is going to cost tens of millions of dollars per month and will only serve to inspire the next generation of radicals. Trump is right that the people of the region, including Russia, Iran, Syria, and Turkey have all the incentive to keep ISIS at bay. So why does he fold like a cheap suit every time the neocons strong-arm him into another dumb foreign policy position?

(从重新发布 罗恩·保罗学院 经作者或代表的许可)
 
隐藏10条评论发表评论
忽略评论者...跟随Endorsed Only
修剪评论?
    []
  1. kikz 说:

    could this not have been a ‘Sun Tzu’?

    • 回复: @Twodees Partain
  2. Trump is owned by Yinon-ists.

    In the Current Year, media tell us men are women and Alqaeda terrorists are ‘moderate rebels’.

  3. HEREDOT 说:

    Trump failed to withdraw from Syria again. Usa is stealing Syrian oil. Russia and the countries of the region will not tolerate this shenanigans forever

    • 回复: @Realist
  4. Dao Gen 说:

    The reason Trump gave in to Graham is because Graham is the chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee. If Trump is impeached, Graham would chair the Senate trial of Trump.

    • 回复: @Realist
  5. Realist 说:
    @HEREDOT

    Russia and the countries of the region will not tolerate this shenanigans forever

    They have so far. Russia, sadly, appears to be all show…no go.

  6. Realist 说:
    @Dao Gen

    The reason Trump gave in to Graham is because Graham is the chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee. If Trump is impeached, Graham would chair the Senate trial of Trump.

    Yes, the US is the most corrupt country on the planet.

  7. Hail 说: • 您的网站

    they are still convinced they can overthrow Assad

    Why? Are they sure things would be better after Assad?

    None of these Forever War people seems to think clearly; they are obsessively playing a game of chess (a metaphor associated with deep stater Zbigniew Brzezinski, who would have been for the Forever War in Syria to fight the Russians, I’m sure).

  8. Lindsey Graham is Israel’s doggie. The Mossad probably has dirty sex tapes of him. Trump also has a leash. He gives the appearance of constantly straining at it & then being pulled back, but I think that is just a show to demonstrate to his base- that portion of it that’s anti-war- that he means well, but the deep state is just too powerful for him. All the PTB connivers are after the oil and additionally want to cripple Syria even further by occupying it’s “breadbasket”.

  9. @kikz

    I don’t see how it could be. Tell me how that would look if it turned out to be true.

  10. Iris 说:

    The real reason the neocons want the US military to occupy Syria’s oil fields is they are still convinced they can overthrow Assad by carving out eastern Syria for the Kurds. They don’t want to keep the oil from ISIS, they want to keep it from the Syrian government

    Dr Paul is always spot on, a beacon of intelligence and integrity.

    The alleged elimination of Al Baghdadi in the Northern Idlib area was accompanied with the US deploying multiple launch rocket system (MLRS) to the southern Syrian area of Al-Tanf, on the borders with Jordan and Iraq, where almost no units of the Islamic State remain.

    Having exceeded its useful lifetime, the NeoCons “Islamic State” proxy is likely to be replaced by another “Islamic” proxy based in the South of Syria, whose role will be to prevent the constitution of a Shia Crescent with neighbouring countries.

    https://tass.com/politics/951739

当前评论者
说:

发表评论-对超过两周的文章发表评论,将在质量和语气上进行更严格的判断


 记得 我的信息为什么?
 电子邮件回复我的评论
$
提交的评论已被许可给 Unz评论 并可以由后者自行决定在其他地方重新发布
在翻译模式下禁用评论
通过RSS订阅此评论主题 通过RSS订阅所有Ron Paul评论