Last year, the Southern Poverty Law Center’s Lecia Brooks helped lead a group of heavily armed communist extremists through downtown Stone Mountain, Georgia.
据报道, Springfield News Sun, out of the crowd of 150 or so Brooks marched with and then officially addressed, “many of the protesters had handkerchiefs over their faces, and several were armed.”
Brooks then identified herself with and lauded the hammer-and-sickle waving, assault rifle wielding mob, who held signs calling for violence: “We turned them back at Stone Mountain, and we can turn them back at every turn. We just have to show up,” she proclaimed.
视频 of the rally leaves no room for plausible deniability about the nature of the militants. None of the groups at this rally were made up of MSNBC liberals or normal Democrats. The SPLC officials knowingly marched with people who want to impose communism and anarchism on America by the use of armed violence, and were proud to use them to terrorize their political opponents.
The display was so disturbing that the SPLC’s supporters in the mass media quickly memoryholed the supposed victory against Confederate heritage groups. The Huffington Post, which apparently sent journalists to cover the event, wrote one small article about it and did not mention the many Soviet flags or masked, armed men sporting red armbands.
In spite of her close ties with violent left-wing extremists, Brooks found herself 作证 in Congress on behalf of the SPLC today, taking credit for financial and social media deplatforming of “hate groups” and demanding more government action against “hate groups.”
None of the “lone wolves” involved in attacks Brooks spoke about received any kind of organized funding for their weapons or plans, nor did they act on behalf of any specific organization, yet in her testimony she disingenuously ties them to the myriad of advocacy groups and 501(c)(3)’s on the SPLC’s arbitrary “hate group” list.
Brooks then condemned attempts at applying the law to “antifa” and “Black Identity Extremists,” instead urging the government to use all of its resources against law-abiding nationalists to prevent them from having the resources to exercise their constitutional rights to free speech and assembly.
According to Brooks, the SPLC has played an important role in Amazon, Paypal, and Facebook’s censoring of books, charities, ideas and opinions. In a 2018 poll, 72% of Americans stated that social media censorship is politically motivated, not a national security question. 51% said that the government should step in to protect political speech. The agenda of Silicon Valley, who today give the SPLC and Anti-Defamation League the power to decide who can and cannot use the internet public square, is extremely unpopular.
That the House of Representatives defers to Brooks on these matters is yet another brazen failure in actually representing the public, or protecting it from the wanton political violence and harassment of private citizens anarchists and communists commit in America all the time and brag about. Their close ties to the SPLC play a role in why the justice and legal system is applied differently to members of “antifa.”
Brooks is not the only person with extremist ties at the SPLC. One of its “senior investigative reporters,” a former BDSM writer named Michael Edison Hayden, was 命名 by extremism researcher Dr Eoin Lenihan as a journalist with close ties with “antifa,” which is supported by threatening messages Hayden has sent in the past openly threatening to send his associates in “antifa” to their family’s home. Hayden has made a name for himself for stalking outside the homes of wives, children and elderly relatives of people targeted by the SPLC for their political views, in attempts to silence them.
Another SPLC employee, 汉娜·盖斯, who attended the Congressional hearing with Brooks, also has significant ties to violent anarchist and communist groups.
These people do not belong anywhere near decisions made by the state or law enforcement. If you feel your basic rights as an American are being eroded, as 92% of Americans do, this is a big piece of the puzzle.
这是 犹太人…it’s always the 犹太人...
Our present situation and the devolving into the morass of “multiculturalism” and “diversity” is no accident. The 犹太法典 and that jewish invention-communism has “rules” for the debasement and eventual destruction of (white) civil society.
以下陈述是个人经历的结果 - 您的里程可能会有所不同......
我是在第一次所谓的“民权”运动中长大的,亲眼目睹了卑鄙的交易,妖魔化,守法的白人的妖魔化以及总体上民间社会的恶化。
Almost all of the “civil-rights” workers and demonstration “handlers” were of one persuasion–New York based leftist communist jews. They cared not one wit about true “civil rights”, but were there to create hate and discontent among their “pets”, their black charges (who were too stupid or naive to see that they were being used to suborn and destroy legitimate government and society–a favorite communist tactic).
这些位于纽约的“ carpetbaggers”激起了他们的憎恨和不满,只是成为了未来的“民权”律师,种族骗子和讨厌美国的左派共产主义者……并且发明了ADL和$ PLC。
我们这些处于“民权”革命中期的白人有句俗话: “每个黑人的背后都有一个犹太人”。 没有说出更真实的话。
我们不要忘记他们对国家教育和娱乐系统的侵扰(一直持续到今天),在那里他们可以传播犹太至上主义毒药。
The so-called “non-violent civil-rights demonstrations” were anything but “non-violent”. Robberies, rapes, and other criminal acts were common, committed by the jewish “handlers” and their black charges but never reported, as even the “mainstream media” was “in on the game” and conveniently turned off their cameras during the acts of violence. You see, even then,”creating crises” was a part of the agenda.
美国的“末日开始”是对白人美国人使用联邦部队,这本身就是对“正当行为”的违反,即禁止将联邦部队用于国内“执法”目的。 由于大多数白人(现在)仍然遵守法律,他们(我们)被联邦军队用来镇压诚实的异议而“被压制”。 我们从未从那些违宪行动中恢复过来。 从那里到那里都是下坡路...
下一步可能是“内战”,其中美国白人将不得不用武力夺回我们的出生权。
祝你好运。旧时代的美国已经死了,消失了,被埋葬了。未来将看到一个由不成比例的犹太亿万富翁组成的内部党,其上层独占所有财富和权力,一个由自由派白人/(((白人)))和象征性的少数派士兵组成的外部党,执行教条并大量宣传,而底层90%的人生活在毒品、色情、垃圾食品和低俗娱乐的海洋中。
an·ar·chism /ˈanərˌkizəm/
noun: anarchism
Belief in the abolition of all “government” and the organization of society on a voluntary, cooperative basis without recourse to force or compulsion.
Do not fear anarchism.
Does anyone know why Striker is afraid of black rifles with pistol grips?
He doesn’t strike me as the kind of guy who would be afraid of guns. Is he a yankee or something?
“The next step may be “civil-war” in which us whites will have to take back our birthright by force.”
Greensboro, North Carolina, 40 years ago. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greensboro_massacre
Athens, Tennessee, 75 years ago. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Athens_(1946)
Know history.
A question that has not been asked is ‘Who appointed the SPLC as quasi governmental designator of Hate organizations?’
Usually in the regulatory realm they need some sort of Authorization passed by Congress(like say a law) and the Executive Agencies issue a rule and you get 90 days for public comment in the Federal Register on said rule(sounding pretty legal Huh?). Then they put it in the Code of Federal Regulations. I was not aware this process had occurred?
In this case it seems as if the Media has simply appointed the SPLC the Supreme All-powerful Designator of what is and what is not Hate? The Media likes this Hate group scam because it provides quick headlines and clickbait for scary stories about people the consumers of media see in strip malls through their car windows.
What are your thoughts about insurgency actions by indigenous cultures herein the Americas? For example, say the Cherokee or the Haudenosaunee or the Quechua act to take back their birthrights by force: will you embrace their right or liberty to do so?