Unz评论•另类媒体选择$
美国主流媒体大都排除了有趣,重要和有争议的观点
 博客浏览帕特里克·科本(Patrick Cockburn)档案
我们正在为鲍里斯·约翰逊及其政府的错误付出代价
通过电子邮件将此页面发送给其他人

 记住我的信息



=>

书签 全部切换总目录添加到图书馆从图书馆中删除 • B
显示评论下一个新评论下一个新回复了解更多
回复同意/不同意/等等 更多... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
同意不同意谢谢LOL轮唱
这些按钮可将您的公开协议,异议,感谢,LOL或巨魔与所选注释一起注册。 仅对最近使用“记住我的信息”复选框保存姓名和电子邮件的频繁评论者可用,并且在任何八个小时的时间内也只能使用三次。
忽略评论者 关注评论者
搜寻文字 区分大小写  确切的词  包括评论
列表 书签

Fear is at a high point in Britain at the moment and with very good reason. There is much to be frightened of as it turns out that 新冠肺炎 has been quicker to learn from experience than bumbling 鲍里斯·约翰逊 and his third-eleven team during a calamitous year in which they have zig-zagged between panic and complacency.

A process of mutation akin to natural selection of the fittest has produced a more virulent variant of the virus better able to invade its human hosts. This swift improvement in its ability to be spread contrasts with the repeated stumbles of the Johnson government since it first underestimated the epidemic in February and March.

This ensured an economically devastating 11-week 锁定, which might have been partially excused by the unprecedented nature of the crisis, if the government had not made exactly the same mistake in September and October, with equally disastrous results. The only common features in its approach over the year were amateurism and inconsistency.

Fear is an inescapable part of any life-threatening epidemic. This has always been true of the great outbreaks of disease in the past from bubonic plague to cholera and polio. The danger of death and injury during an epidemic is more pervasive than in wartime.

The consequent sense of fear gets bad press for being only a step away from cowardice, but it is essential as the only way to mobilise whole populations for common action and to persuade individuals to make sacrifices for the general good.

Much of the sorry saga of the British government’s shambolic response to the pandemic is about its inept and counter-productive manipulation of public fears. At the start of the year, it tried to downplay them because it underestimated the threat and half-opted – it is a government that does everything by halves – for “herd immunity”. Johnson attended the England v Wales rugby match on 7 March and allowed the Cheltenham Festival attended by 250,000 people go ahead three days later.

Selling herd immunity requires downplaying public fears about the gravity of the illness. The message being sent by those mass gatherings in March was that there was nothing much to worry about. Fortunately, people did not believe it, as they watched governments locking down all over Europe. By the time the British government, panicked by forecasts of hundreds of thousands of deaths, did impose a lockdown on 23 March, people were generally before them in wanting to close down the country.

I believe that at this moment the government made a serious mistake about the public mood. The very high level of compliance with the first lockdown was because people were genuinely frightened. When I took a walk for exercise I would pass through entirely empty streets, though the parked cars showed that people were in their houses. The ghostly quiet reminded me of the atmosphere in Beirut and Baghdad in the hour or two after they had been shelled or bombed.

The unexpectedly high compliance with the restrictions gave Johnson and his ministers a false impression that they had greater control over people’s behaviour than was the case, for the real motivation driving the lockdown was not the government mandate. Ministers did not see it that way, playing up undoubted scenes of carnage in hospitals as the precursor for worse horrors to come and the imminent collapse of the health service.

Bad though the situation was, it was not quite the Crimean War-type breakdown that was being portrayed night after night. There was no need to further frighten people who were already thoroughly scared. Exaggerating the horrors also risked discrediting the fear factor that would be a necessity in a prolonged campaign to contain the virus. As it was, national solidarity was greatly damaged by the revelation at the end of May about Dominic Cummings’ notorious trip to Barnard Castle, a turning point made more emphatic by Johnson’s refusal to sack him.

But the grossest error was the cavalier abandon with which the government changed gear on 4 July, lifting restrictions willy-nilly and giving the impression that the coronavirus was permanently contained. People were allowed to travel abroad with little hindrance and were subsidised to ‘Eat Out to Help Out’. No wonder that fear of the virus ebbed while many people, particularly in deprived areas, calculated that the risk of losing their job and not getting another one outweighed the receding danger of infection. Fear was still there but no longer exclusively of the virus.

The government now wants to blame all that has gone so spectacularly – and for many people fatally – wrong on the unforeseeable rise of the mutant virus. But it was clearly losing control of the crisis from September onwards, after Johnson rejected the two-week “circuit breaker” lockdown, recommended by the chief scientific officers and the Sage advisory committee.

Government press conferences and media focus too much on government restrictions and pay too little attention to whether or not people comply with them. Yet the evidence is that compliance is now low with a survey by Imperial College London finding that, while 70 per cent of those asked say they intend to isolate when necessary, only 20 per cent really do so.

Given the government’s failure to develop an effective test, trace and isolate system, despite spending £22bn, suppressing the virus to a significant degree must rely on the blunt and economically self-destructive instrument of the lockdown. But the impact of this has been seriously undermined by past failures, U-turns and, for many people, a feeling of burn-out leading to fatalism and a sense that “what will be, will be”.

立即订购

Fear of a different type has a damaging consequence. The failures of the Johnson government have been investigated by well-known publications, government agencies, academic institutions and parliamentary committees. Their verdicts are damning on almost every aspect of government, such as 报告 that £8bn out of £16bn in PPE procurement contracts went to companies with connections to politicians in the Conservative Party. Yet these well-documented scandals seldom top the news and do surprisingly little harm to government credibility.

A partial explanation for this, aside from unrelenting government news management, is that nobody wants to discover, in the midst of one of the worst crisis to strike Britain since 1940, that those in charge of the country are incompetent nincompoops with their snouts buried deep in the trough. Nobody, however sceptical about the abilities of Johnson and his crew, had expected them to be quite as bad as they have turned out to be.

Traditional English deference towards the powers-that-be is wearing thin but, even so, many people resist facing up to the comic opera inadequacy of British leadership at a time of such extreme national peril – understandably so since it is a truly frightening sight.

(从重新发布 独立 经作者或代表的许可)
 
• 类别: 对外政策 •标签: 鲍里斯·约翰逊, 英国, 冠状病毒 
隐藏13条评论发表评论
忽略评论者...跟随Endorsed Only
修剪评论?
    []
  1. Anon[240]• 免责声明 说:

    Taiwan (7 deaths) got a dress rehearsal for Covid, when Sars hit. They figured-out what to for the next pandemic, and got it set up. Too bad the UK and the US didn’t ask Taiwan what to do, right at the beginning. There would be no shame in that. You tell Taiwan that different countries excel at different things, and we’re pretty good at some other things, but you are better at this than we are, so tell us what to do.

  2. utu 说:

    The government now wants to blame all that has gone so spectacularly – and for many people fatally – wrong on the unforeseeable rise of the mutant virus.

    Number of mutations will increase with number of infections. If in March the decision was made to go for the permanent suppression of the virus which would require effective contact tracing once the lockdowns brought down the number of infections to the manageable level the new mutation probably would not appear. Instead the concept of curve flattening was formulated that promised nothing but preventing the medical system being overwhelmed. There was no objective in reducing the number of deaths from covid in a long run. It was a fatalists strategy that people would die sooner or later while the opposing herd immunity strategy was promising people that they would de sooner than later.

    Lifting of restrictions in May w/o having and effective contact tracing system in place was a fundamental mistake. But the same mistake was done in many other countries like Czechia or Poland or Slovenia who slept through summer thinking that the epidemic was basically defeated by their timely lockdowns while w/o suppressing the virus they allowed the percolating infections to gain the speed because of lack of effective contact tracing.

    I think that an investigative journalist should research where the herd immunity concept came from and who was pushing it within the UK gov circles. The herd immunity concept once it was transformed into the meme that we can do nothing and be OK had the most pernicious effect on the integrity and coherence of the response by the state and society to the epidemic. If the do nothing meme came from a foreign power we could rightfully claim it was a part of psychological warfare that turned out to be very effective.

  3. Bill Jones 说:

    The UK is paying for the mistakes of the corrupt pederast Ted Heath.

  4. 谁说有人害怕Covid-19? 迫使人们感到担忧的是无用的乔布斯价值。

  5. You haven’t given us the basic statistic, how many Brutes died of the Crown Virus, who were otherwise healthy.

  6. animalogic 说:

    Article is correct — BJ & his Government are dreck & a joke…. yet were an election called tomorrow the average dopey UK voter would give Boris another 5 years to poison the wells further.

    • 回复: @Davidoff
  7. Davidoff 说:
    @animalogic

    Very true but it is/was/would be the ENGLISH voter… Here in Scotland the vast majority can’t stand Boris and the whole bunch of conservatives clowns.

  8. polistra 说:

    Boris isn’t making any mistakes. His assignment is to destroy Britain. He’s succeeding beautifully.

    • 同意: Thomasina
  9. What do you expect from a puppet of Zion? And what does Cockburn care when he’s a globalist who pushes for the erasure of white indigenous UK? He’s an eracist or erasist.

    • 同意: Thomasina
    • 回复: @Nuncle
  10. I noticed this ‘new more contagious strain’ has only been reported in ‘Five eyes’ countries. Coincidence I’m sure.

    No amount of marketing is going to turn “Vaccination hesitancy” into “Stick me please”.

    In fact it does the opposite, turning hesitancy into outright rejection.

  11. Biggest hoax in history

    ‘No evidence’ that asymptomatic Covid-19 cases were infectious, analysis of post-lockdown Wuhan concludes

    https://www.rt.com/news/507402-wuhan-asymptomatic-cases-coronavirus-study/

  12. Nuncle 说:

    They’re not mistakes if they’re deliberate.

  13. Nuncle 说:
    @Priss Factor

    Cockburn is pretty far left, if I recall. That’s why he only sees ‘mistakes,’ not malign intentions.

当前评论者
说:

发表评论-对超过两周的文章发表评论,将在质量和语气上进行更严格的判断


 记得 我的信息为什么?
 电子邮件回复我的评论
$
提交的评论已被许可给 Unz评论 并可以由后者自行决定在其他地方重新发布
在翻译模式下禁用评论
通过RSS订阅此评论主题 通过RSS订阅所有Patrick Cockburn的评论
Personal 古典文学
“他们甚至无法保护自己,那么他们能为我做什么?”
“所有地狱都与Muqtada决裂”军阀:Muqtada al-Sadr的崛起