Unz评论•另类媒体选择$
美国主流媒体大都排除了有趣,重要和有争议的观点
 博客浏览保罗·格特弗里德(Paul Gottfried)档案
Academe终于发现了保守主义公司的右翼批评家。MSM会成为下一个吗?
通过电子邮件将此页面发送给其他人

 记住我的信息



=>

书签 全部切换总目录添加到图书馆从图书馆中删除 • B
显示评论下一个新评论下一个新回复了解更多
回复同意/不同意/等等 更多... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
同意不同意谢谢LOL轮唱
这些按钮可将您的公开协议,异议,感谢,LOL或巨魔与所选注释一起注册。 仅对最近使用“记住我的信息”复选框保存姓名和电子邮件的频繁评论者可用,并且在任何八个小时的时间内也只能使用三次。
忽略评论者 关注评论者
搜寻文字 区分大小写  确切的词  包括评论
列表 书签

霍利批评家乔治·霍利博士, [给他发电子邮件] 阿拉巴马大学的助理教授,通过生产提供了急需的公共服务 美国保守主义右翼批评家. 霍利的 工作, 由杰出的媒体出版 在堪萨斯大学进行美国研究,应该给他带来当之无愧的重视。 当然,美国不得不等待这么长时间才能获得专门致力于什么的学术著作,这当然是荒谬的 VDARE.com 的读者会考虑真正的权利。 但事实是,就主流媒体而言, 建立共和党 以及 保守主义公司的走狗 是“极右翼”——直到他们相遇 唐纳德·特朗普。

在他的书中,霍利觉得有必要 信号 他不赞成他讨论的一些观点。 这可能只是出版的价格。 如果我还年轻 考虑任期 在美国大学的普通政治科学系,我也会用 PC 溴化物喷我的书,以防止左派疯子离开我。 在力量不平衡的情况下,我们应该感谢霍利敢于对我方稍加尊重。

我们是美国权利的一部分, 共和党建立新保守派记者 成功地“甩掉了公交车”,因为 乔纳·戈德堡 描述了这种拯救(对于 ) 过程。 [保守清洗的逻辑, 保罗·戈特弗里德(Paul Gottfried) 基数 9年2015月XNUMX日]

但霍利准确地指出,永无止境的清洗让美国的政治话语“僵化”了。 因此,他试图通过全面剖析他的主题所代表的各种思想来拯救这些“右翼批评家”。 我们遇到古保守主义者, 古自由主义者,市场无政府主义者, 新异教徒 欧洲新右派、白人民族主义者和种族现实主义者的追随者。 甚至还有客串 黑暗启蒙。

VDARE.com 的读者可能很难找到 David Duke 和 帕特·布坎南 在霍利的叙述中并列。 但霍利这样做是正确的。 从他们的新保守主义批评者的角度来看,杜克和布坎南同样应受谴责——远不那么右派但更令人讨厌的唐纳德·特朗普也是如此,他敢于违背仍然自称的东西的意愿竞选总统,无论多么具有欺骗性,“这 保守运动。” 注意持续的荒谬努力 将特朗普与大卫杜克联系起来.

将这些“右翼批评者”团结在一起的唯一原因是他们被同一个右翼完全边缘化,这个右翼如此渴望与激进的左派一起通过影子盒获利。 因此,霍利记录了保守主义公司对 ME 等持不同政见者发动的一些最可耻的迫害运动 布拉德福德,山姆 弗朗西斯, 约翰 德比郡, 杰森 烈酒,乔 索布兰 与其他人。

这种对异见权利的强烈仇恨从何而来? 进行大清洗的政委显然在他们的敌人身上看到了一些不仅令人反感而且邪恶的东西。 因此,我们得到了左派的诽谤“法西斯,” “反犹太人,“和”种族主义者”通过 可敬的权利。

霍利提出的一种可能性只是传统的主流(左派-新保守主义)解释:他写道:“在许多情况下,对边缘化意识形态的负面评价可能是正确的。” 事实上,霍利断断续续地告诉我们,有些主题可能是仇外心理,而男人喜欢 山姆·弗朗西斯Jared Taylor 没有秘密 他们的“种族主义”倾向。 霍利甚至斥责共和党的“移民限制主义”“驱使”少数族裔进入民主党。

But the only example of this tendency that Hawley cites is the passage of Proposition 187 in California in 1994, under (let’s stress) the generally liberal Republican governor 皮特·威尔逊. Omitted from consideration are Republican support for the Immigration Reform Act of 1965, the Amnesty legislation supported by 里根 and congressional Republicans in 1986, and finally the repeated strenuous efforts of George W. Bush, Marco Rubio, John McCain, Lindsey Graham, and other leading Republicans to Amnesty at least 11 million more illegals residing in the country.

Besides, as Hawley himself admits, these illegal residents wouldn’t vote Republican anyway, for economic reasons if nothing else.

More convincing than the ritualistic clichés in Hawley’s work are his assessments of the stale thinking and simplistic GOP talking points that haven’t changed since the 1980s. In contrast to the tiresome PR agents associated with the “movement,” (including the 品种 of real and bleached blondes on FoxNews), the paleoconservatives and paleolibertarians Hawley profiles ooze with original insight and vast learning. But even though many of the scholars and writers on the Dissident Right are far more well-read and erudite than the 小图标 of the official “movement,” Conservatism Inc. simply falls back on calling them stupid.

Hawley in contrast devotes respectful attention to his subjects’ scholarship, which leaves the impression that he is truly struck by the force of their ideas. He even explores my sometimes (alas) abstruse tracts on German political thought and devotes considerable space to Carl Schmitt, Martin Heidegger and other mentors of the European New Right and its American disciples. In short, he suggests the hatred directed towards the Dissident Right is motivated by fear of the intellectual threat we represent.

Hawley investigates in depth an in-house discussion about the paleoconservatism that had emerged in the 1980s and 1990s held between long-time 编年史 Editor Tom Fleming and myself. Fleming “argued that paleoconservatism is a continuation of the interwar old right, whereas Paul Gottfried viewed paleoconservatism as the true heir of the 1950s conservative movement 在此之前 hijacked by neoconservatism.”

My views have changed since then. I now think the paleos were largely a new movement of the Right born of a lost cause, trying to counter the rise of neoconservatives to a position of control over the Conservative Movement. But though the paleos gave it their best shot, they went nowhere as a counterforce after the defeat of Pat Buchanan’s briefly successful presidential runs in 1992, 1996, and 2000.

Hawley ascribes the view that “paleoconservatism is no longer a meaningful force in the United States’’ to me, and I won’t deny it. He says there are two reasons for paleoconservatism’s eclipse: first, the passing of the generation that identified with it and its defeat in trying to take back the movement; and second, the changing social and cultural face of America, which would be even less receptive to paleoconservatives than were the 1980s.

But that doesn’t mean the fight against Conservatism Inc. (and its neoconservative masters) is over. Both Hawley and I have discerned a new populist Right emerging, which focuses on the high costs of mass immigration and capitalizes on growing popular resentment against Leftist elites.

立即订购

VDARE.com is obviously a part of this emerging political force. 彼得Brimelow and VDARE.com are cited and Peter is singled out (not unfavorably) for his “scathing attacks on American immigration policy.” As a result, we are told, Peter “is no longer published in mainstream venues.”

Three other contributors to VDARE.com who have at least four pages lavished on them in Hawley’s study are: 史蒂夫·塞勒(Steve Sailer), 他的 daring commentaries on 社会生物学; John Derbyshire f or his examinations of IQ differences and their effect on human behavior and professional achievements; and, well, me, for my studies on E uropean political thought and for being a long-lived nuisance to the neocons. To his credit, Hawley reviews the purge of John Derbyshire by the shameful 国家评论 with sympathy.

Donald Trump in the United States and the National Front in France are two examples of the emerging populist political force—sometimes called “国家保守主义.” In the present historical circumstances, a coalition of the dispossessed, built on the white working class is probably the best the Right can hope for. Hawley is already at work on a sequel dealing with this alternative, populist Right. From having seen his prospectus, I expect it to be entirely on target.

Needless to say, I don’t expect the particular paleoconservatism with which Buchanan and I were associated to make a comeback even if the political climate changes. As one of my favorite thinkers (yes, 卡尔·施密特) famously observed: “an historical truth is true only once.” And this aphorism is particularly relevant for the history of failed political movements. After all, the overthrow of Soviet Communism eventually brought to power in Russia the conservative nationalist government of Vladimir Putin. But it hasn’t resulted in restoring the Romanoff dynasty in Russia.

至少,还没有。

保罗·格特弗里德 [ 给他发电子邮件] 是宾夕法尼亚州伊丽莎白敦学院的人文科学退休教授。 他是《 自由主义之后, 多元文化主义与罪恶政治 马克思主义的奇怪死亡 他最近的一本书是 利奥·施特劳斯(Leo Strauss)与美国的保守主义运动.

(从重新发布 威达 经作者或代表的许可)
 
• 类别: 思想 •标签: 保守运动 
隐藏65条评论发表评论
忽略评论者...跟随Endorsed Only
修剪评论?
    []
  1. iffen 说:

    Thus we get the Leftist slurs “fascist,” “anti-Semite,” and “racist” adopted by the Respectable Right.

    There are real fascists, anti-Semites and racists. If you do not separate yourself from them, then by default the slur will be applied to you. (birds of a feather) If you can’t separate yourself from politicos like David Duke, if there are no political movements or leaders to your right, you are stuck.

    You can frame it in terms of freedom of thought, freedom of association, and freedom of expression all day long. The fact remains that you will get a double dose of the Trump treatment. In other words, you will lose.

  2. In other words, you will lose.

    Is that a lament, or is it a threat?

    Prof. Gottfried, I have a question. Radio talker Mark Levin, no friend of Donald Trump, says that Trumpism is “Populist Nationalist,” implying that Levin-approved conservatism is non-nationalist.

    My question is, was there ever a variety of American conservatism that was not nationalistic?

    Levin has also labelled Trumpism “Populist Nationalist Agrarian,” which seems even loopier.

    • 回复: @iffen
  3. iffen 说:
    @David Davenport

    Is that a lament, or is it a threat?

    Mostly an opinion, certainly not a threat. I guess more of a lament in that the Professor’s caste system social and political order would have to be an improvement over what we have. At least they would let us eat cake on occasion.

  4. Kudzu Bob 说:
    @iffen

    In other words, you will lose.

    That would be a correct prediction if this were 1996, but this is 2016 and the psychological conditioning called PC has begun to lose its effectiveness. To Millennials, Hitler is just that funny character in those “Hitler Finds Out” videos on YouTube.

  5. Reg Cæsar 说:
    @iffen

    Yes, there are “real fascists, anti-Semites, and racists”. They’re to the left of us. Hell, most are to the left of John Kasich.

    • 回复: @Maj. Kong
  6. @iffen

    The most effective approach is to laugh at the accuser. No one really cares about David Duke, he’s a shibboleth. The whole point of cultural Marxist attacks is to force apology and abasement. The main thing is refusing to be cowed.

    Acting like you want perpetuates cultural Marxist mind control over conservatives (& liberals). People love Donald Trump because he (mostly) refuses to kow-tow. He made a big mistake backtracking on the ‘jail women who abort’ thing, though – far better to be unreasonable & stick to it, than moderate and apologetic.

    • 回复: @iffen
  7. iffen 说:
    @Simon in London

    I agree with your comment. Satire and ridicule are very effective weapons. You are correct that the “whole point” is to force one to put up the Greengrocer Sign. (I still despise the use of the bogeyman words, cultural Marxist.)

    No one really cares about David Duke, he’s a shibboleth.

    Then why does someone with a first rate mind like Professor Gottfried defend him?

    The “alternative” is going nowhere unless it can separate itself from the David Dukes.

    • 回复: @juster
    , @rod1963
    , @Ace
    , @Maj. Kong
  8. juster 说:
    @iffen

    I have been trying to argue this point with the alt-right. They see that a lot of young people on 4chan or twitter etc. don’t care about the anti-Semitism and more egregious racism and assume that somehow that reflects the general population, but it doesn’t. I think this, among several other unrelated factors, is going to cost Trump the election. People who insist on always talking about “the Jewish question” or “race-mixing” are seriously messing this burgeoning movement up. That isn’t to say that there is no substance in any of these critiques, but the public isn’t ready for that. Not even close.

    • 同意: iffen
    • 回复: @WorkingClass
  9. rod1963 说:
    @iffen

    No one among the Nationalist/populist movement really gives a rats ass when some smelly, dried out liberal puke calls them a racist or try to associate David Duke with them – which was tried and failed very badly.

    Thing is, economic and social pain inflicted by decades of globalism and immigration has made a lot of folks very pissed off. This is why all the authoritarian-thought stopping PC/MC labels of “racist”, “xenophobe”, “islamaphobe”, etc don’t work.

    Pain and fear tend to do that. Twenty years ago those tactics worked, but it was a different country back then. The damage from globalization, illegal immigration and trade were just beginning to be felt. Now it’s front and center for anyone whose not upper middle class and people are very worried and many are economically and socially hurt by the policies promoted by the political class, Neo-Cons and Wall Street.

    • 回复: @iffen
    , @Bill
  10. Ace 说:
    @iffen

    Socialist regimes caused immense damage, suffering and death in the past century and David Duke has caused none. Where is your call for the left to separate themselves from the absurd socialist Sanders?

    No, you want rightists to separate themselves from Duke like old ladies who tremble at the sight of a mouse and flee to the nearest chair. Someone out there engages in crimethink so there must be a Def Con IV plan for separation.

    And when exactly did this joinder with Duke take place?

    • 回复: @iffen
  11. Maj. Kong 说:
    @Reg Cæsar

    No matter the intention, I and probably some others read your comment as “the Democrats are the real racists” refrain of conservatism inc.

  12. Maj. Kong 说:
    @iffen

    For a brief moment David Duke was an extremely popular politician in Louisiana, that happened to make an ill timed decision to run for Senate, and then Governor, than to the House district that later sent Bobby Jindal and David Vitter to Congress. Subsequently, he’s been a demon trotted out by the left and conservatism inc.

    But it should be remembered that he was running at the same time as Pat Buchanan and Ross Perot. The latter two and their supporters were tarred with the same brush. That is the point Gottfried is making.

    David Duke tapped into a real dissent from the governing elite orthodoxy, and showed how desperate the establishment was willing to go. For that one brief moment in 1991 he had the left scared.

    Look at the left, do they disavow Farrakhan? Al Sharpton? Jesse Jackson? How about Luis Gutierrez? Fabian Nunez? Abe Foxman? Chuck Schumer?

    I don’t favor the worldview of David Duke, but I don’t believe in unilateral disarmament.

    • 回复: @iffen
  13. iffen 说:
    @rod1963

    No one among the Nationalist/populist movement really gives a rats ass

    This is not the target group.

    The target group is the moderate, apolitical “middle” which can be persuaded by such rhetoric. We don’t really know the size of this group. It could be 20-30-40 %. Trump would be well above 50% if people weren’t scared of the possible validity of the racist accusations that have been directed toward him.

  14. iffen 说:
    @Ace

    And when exactly did this joinder with Duke take place?

    Note the continuing ludicrous efforts to link Trump to David Duke.

    • 回复: @Ace
  15. iffen 说:
    @Maj. Kong

    Look at the left, do they disavow Farrakhan? Al Sharpton? Jesse Jackson? How about Luis Gutierrez? Fabian Nunez? Abe Foxman? Chuck Schumer?

    These people are the essence of their side.

    Is David Duke the essence of your side?

    If any on the left deviate from the orthodoxy then they will be burned at the stake.

    One of the many advantages of “the other side” is the efficiency with which they separate themselves from heretics.

    “Our side” has a disability in this area. We would rather protect free speech for Nazis than win a presidential election.

    • 回复: @Maj. Kong
  16. Bill 说:
    @iffen

    You’re just mindlessly repeating the standard neocon argument for purging. The “real fascists, anti-Semites, and racists” get to be identified by the left, and then the right is supposed, dutifully, to purge them. This is a recipe for defeat. And defeat is what it has brought: uninterrupted defeat for 50 years. Defeat so complete that there is now a right for bizarre perverts to hang out in the bathroom with your daughter.

    • 回复: @iffen
  17. Bill 说:
    @rod1963

    Indeed. If iffen was actually concerned with preventing the rise of “real fascists, anti-Semites, and racists,” then he would be hysterically condemning people who misuse those words. What the left is going to succeed in doing, eventually, is convincing whites that “real fascists, anti-Semites, and racists” are the only people who are looking out for them. This will not result in support for “real fascists, anti-Semites, and racists” in the long run.

  18. Bill 说:

    “including the assortment of real and bleached blondes on FoxNews”

    Which ones are real? I don’t see any blondes in that picture. Lotsa black roots. Lotsa dark eyebrows. Lotsa hyperactive eyebrow pluckers (to minimize the visual impact of the dark eyebrows).

    I could believe that there is a blonde on Fox. I’ve just never seen one.

    Shorter Bill: Megyn Kelly: blonde

  19. Rehmat 说:

    Dr. David Duke and Pat. Buchanan have nothing in common except the Whiteness of there skins.

    Pat. Buchanan is part of anti-Muslim Zionist Christian racist establishment while David Duke is champion of human rights regardless of religion and race – even though he was associated with anti-Black racist group KKK, funded by several Zionist Jews.

    In April 2015, former US Congressman, Dr. David Duke and Pat. Buchanan’s duplicate, professor Kevin MacDonald (California State University) stated that the nuclear deal between the so-called P5+1 and Iran is ‘onerous’, and is meant to keep the Zionist entity the only nuclear power in the Middle East.

    Both agreed that the deal reached with Iran whereby that country has agreed to long-term restrictions on its nuclear power program that no other country in the world is subject to. Dr. Duke indicated that this will put Iran into a position of vulnerability, although both men voiced understanding for why Iran would being willing to make such a major concession in order to avoid a massive war. They also assessed the motives of President Obama as well as the different voices in the organized Jewish community. They agreed that while there is a massive push for war with Iran from “crazy Zionists,” more cunning Zionists realize that war would not be in the best interests of Jews.

    Last year, Dr. Duke was interviewed by Argentinian investigative journalist and author Adrian Salbuchi. They discussed the evil nature of the Organized Jewry and Zionism at the Buenos Aires-based TLV1 TV Channel. Watch the interview below.

    https://rehmat1.com/2015/05/15/dr-duke-on-iran-israel-and-zionism/

  20. iffen 说:
    @Bill

    “real fascists, anti-Semites, and racists” get to be identified by the left, and then the right is supposed, dutifully, to purge them.

    Exactly wrong. The should identify the heretics and purge them. Then when the left tries to get someone purged that doesn’t deserve it you tell them to f* off.

  21. Agent76 说:

    Apr 8, 2016 The Death of Western Culture in 60 Seconds

    Stefan Molyneux explains a simple and undiscussed mechanism which has lead to the erosion of western culture and values. Hint: You’re being forced to pay for it!

  22. mtn cur 说:

    I have obligations more worthy of my labor than to differentiate between neo con “fear of intellectual threats,” fear of intellect as a whole and trifling intellectual laziness sheep dipped as anti intellectualism. Among the first lessons of poly sci 101 is that far left and far right are back to back in their thinking and now both lots have metastasized into shills for the supreme soviet, aka the corporation. As to which ones are knowing frauds and which too stupid to know that the merger of private and public sector is a brain shot for their alleged different dictums is a task for those with strong stomachs and the compassion of a saint . Thus, the various quarreling demographics are little better than crabs in a basket, trapped by the various rotten fish of credit card consumerism and propaganda proffered by the ad agencies created and paid by the vampire classes. The myth of the one percenters serves to conceal that they are coat tail riders under the magic money spell of the 100 odd necromancers in charge.( .0000000001 %? ) I repeat a prior remark that free market practices like NAFTA tore the peasantry off of the family farm or whatever other means of support and not only made them refugees in their own country , but illegal occupants of their own homes and lands. Unlike many citizens of the developed countries, this was most often not due to charging fast food, soda pop, new cars and swimming pools on their credit cards. Rather than using high tech weapons or seal 6 to assassinate troublesome peasants, we should arrange ax handle shampoos for our high misleadership.

    • 回复: @OutWest
    , @woodNfish
  23. Priss Factor [又名“多米尼克·弗兰肯学会”] 说: • 您的网站

    Thug discovers Ayn Rand. Sheeeeiiiiiit.

    • 回复: @Agent76
  24. Bill 说:
    @iffen

    Exactly wrong. The right should identify the heretics and purge them.

    But fascism, anti-Semitism, and racism are not heresies for the right. Socialism, multiculturalism, perversion, and feminism are heresies.

    • 回复: @iffen
  25. OutWest 说:
    @mtn cur

    Communism and fascism are both socialism but differ in that the former takes title to productive means while the latter leaves title thereto with the private sector but asserts full control over the productive means. Economically the United States is essentially fascist. This is confirmed by the distain the government has for private effort, i.e. individuals don’t deserve credit for accomplishments since these are merely artifacts of government policy. Of course individuals do accomplish worthwhile ends despite the government disapproval.

    • 回复: @mtn cur
  26. woodNfish 说:
    @iffen

    The right should identify the heretics and purge them.

    Why? Do you ever see the Left purge anyone? Criminals, rapists, racists? No. They embrace them, forgive them, call their crimes something else and go on. The only reason conservatives aver purge anyone is because of the pressure from the LSM.

  27. woodNfish 说:
    @mtn cur

    Guillotines. Lots and lots of guillotines. Just remember, to kill the hydra, you must cut off its heads.

  28. @iffen

    Like Jason Richwine, John Derbyshire, the late Joe Sobran?

    • 回复: @juster
    , @iffen
    , @iffen
  29. Agent76 说:

    Sep 7, 2014 Tom Woods – Representative Slavery

    Thomas Woods puts the notion of representative government under the microscope.

  30. iffen 说:
    @Bill

    But fascism, anti-Semitism, and racism are not heresies for the right.

    They should be. How much clearer can I state it?

    • 回复: @Maj. Kong
    , @Bill
  31. juster 说:
    @The Anti-Gnostic

    The race realists are completely different from something like The Right Stuff or Daily Stormer. Those names you cited are people who should never have been purged. But if we don’t disassociate from the DS and TRS, what we end up with is people like Richwine, Derbyshire etc. lumped in with the hardcore white nationalists and national socialists. We know they’re completely and totally different, but the average Joe won’t.

    I think iffen’s point is simply this: we aren’t going to win elections with a minority of the population, and the majority is just not going to like DS-type white nationalism. It’s a losing ticket. It destroys the possibility of electoral victory. We can’t win with it, not now, not in 20 years. But we can win with Trump and legitimate complaints about immigration, multiculturalism etc. as long as we can’t be brushed off as racists and anti-Semites.

  32. iffen 说:
    @The Anti-Gnostic

    Like Jason Richwine, John Derbyshire, the late Joe Sobran?

    Derbyshire, yes.

    The other two I will withhold judgment. Everything that I have read about Richwine leads me to say no.

    I know little about Sobran.

  33. Agent76 说:

    5年2012月XNUMX日与Jack Hunter的交易:告别保守主义

    Conservatives don’t “fix” big government. They end it!

    https://youtu.be/7TS4KCaoAGM

  34. @juster

    The Left has no enemies to its left, and they’ve permanently enacted the welfare state, captured all the institutions and won and continue to win the Culture War. Your respectability gains you nothing.

    • 回复: @iffen
  35. Priss Factor [又名“多米尼克·弗兰肯学会”] 说: • 您的网站
    @iffen

    “There are real fascists, anti-Semites and racists.”

    And they are the True Right.

    Purging them would be like purging pizza of cheese.

    I’m the only true fascist, race-ist, and counter-Jewite.

    Fascism could have been the greatest ideology of the 20th century, but Mussolini and Hitler messed it up. But many systems fail at first. Greek democracy and Roman Republic failed too. But they had some good ideas. So, what we need is neo-fascism that fixes the old problems of fascism and develops a better one.

    As for race-ism, it is truth. Races do exist, and racial differences do matter. True Right must be honest about race.
    Indeed, regardless of what people SAY, just look at the Race Reality or Raceality all around you? We see Racealism all over cuz racial differences matter.
    In sports, blacks dominate cuz they are stronger and tougher. Jews dominate finance cuz they got knack for numbers and verbal skills.
    It doesn’t matter what people say. It is what they show by their actions that really count. It’s like 99% of businessmen will say they are not greedy but they are.
    It’s like 99% of politicians will say they loathe lies but they are liars.
    Most of what people say is BS. What they show by their actions is what really counts.
    And Libs and Cons and blacks and Jews and etc are all Race-ists, Race Realists, or Racealists. Even those who consciously believe in racial equality don’t practice it in real life. Their actions show what they really feel.

    As for ‘antisemtism’, it really just means DON’T THINK ABOUT JEWISH POWER. But all honest critics of power must think about Jewish Power.
    Now, if most Jews were pro-white and pro-West, white folks should forge close alliance with Jews.
    But the fact is the majority of Jews have hostile feelings toward whites. Jewish elites look down on white gentiles as less intelligent and fear that white gentiles will challenge Jewish power. So, Jews seek to demoralize whites with ugly decadent culture and ‘white guilt’, demasculinize white males with homo agenda and interracialism that encourages white women to prize the Negro as the favored mating partner. Jewish control of media tells white folks, “You white boys need to be more fruity and pansy, and you white girls need to go with negroes since white boys are such pansy dorks.” Have white guys emulate Bruce ‘Caitlyn’ Jenner while white girls run off with negro studs.

    So, it is necessary for the True Right to be counter-Jewish. Now, not all Jews are part of this anti-white agenda, but many of them are, and their power and agenda have to be called out.

    The Jewish Agenda for whites is racial inferioritism. Jews won’t call it that, but that is what it is. Who decides which race is superior and inferior? Free individual women do. Their wombs decide which race is superior. Sexual preference of women determine the future generations. The race that survives and dominates in the politics of the testicles and wombs is the superior race. Rest is all just a matter of opinion.

    For most of human history, women had no choice in sexual mating. Most men didn’t either. Most marriages were arranged by parents or social superiors.
    So, white women had kids with white men.
    And then, white women and white men had choice. But since white nations were all white, white women could only choose white men. And since white men ruled the world, they had prestige and promoted their own image as the dominant male archetype. This unity of white man and white woman ensured the survival of the West.

    But now we live in a globalized world. US has lots of black guys, and EU is filling up with black guys and young Muslim men with explosive balls. And they want white women. Meanwhile, white males have been raised to be pansy, castrated, tootsy, and PC-addled with ‘white guilt’. White women grow up to rap music, interracial propaganda, and black domination of sports.

    In the past, white women didn’t choose their partners. Their partners were chosen by their fathers.
    Then, white women did choose but could only choose white men who held the power in white-dominated or white-homogeneous societies.

    Today, white men are accused of all the sins and problems of the world. White morality is all about cucking out to Jews, homos, and blacks.
    In this climate, white women with freedom and individuality get to choose their mates. And increasingly, white wombs prefer black seed and want to produce black babies for black dads… or even Muslim babies for Muslim men who still have manhood left unlike all these dorky tootsy white guys who’ve been PC-castrated.

    So, how should we determine racial superiority and inferiority? It is no longer a matter of opinion. It is really decided by the wombs. Politics of the Womb decides the superior race and inferior race.
    If more and more white women decided that their wombs should take black seed and produce black babies, it means blacks are the superior race due to the simple fact that the wombs, generators of future people, prefer black seed over white seed.

    Men cannot produce children on their own. They can only produce children through women. And if their own women reject the men of their race, it means that the women have decided that their own men are INFERIOR to the men of another race with whom they want to have kids.
    This is no longer a matter of opinion since it has profound consequences on life.
    Suppose there are 100 white women and all decide to reject white seed and take black seed and produce black babies. One would have to conclude black race is superior to the white race. Why? Because white women decided it to be so. Why else would they have rejected white men and taken the seed of black men, as Ann Dunham did? And why did so many white women vote for Obama?

    In the past, women didn’t decide. And even when they decided to choose their mates, white women only had access to white men in white nations.
    But now, globalism has broken down all barriers. Countless Negro men are coming to Europe. Also, Jews own the mass media and fill up white female minds with images of the superior Negro stud with more muscle and dong power.
    And increasing number of white women decide to have kids with black men, often out of wedlock(and we see this all over America now). That will decide which race is superior and inferior.

    We can argue forever about higher IQ and etc, but the future generation will be the product of sexual decisions of free women. Not only Who, Whom, but Woo, Womb.
    And the biggest threat to white race is the Negro because only the Negro man has more manly qualities than white men. And Jews know this, which is why they are promoting interracialism that is mostly about white women rejecting white men and going with black men and using their white wombs to create racially superior black babies.

    We can argue forever that blacks are NOT superior. Our opinions don’t matter. What matters is what the women decide because the pathway to survival and future life is through the wombs of women.
    Women’s wombs are like gardens. And men’s testes are like bags of seeds. If white women open their garden to white seeds, white children will grow in the garden.
    But if white women shut their gates to white seeds and only allow black seeds, then their white gardens will produce black children.
    And more and more white women are choosing to do this. And with population explosion in Africa and endless flow of black males into EU, you can see where this is all going. Every year, millions more black males in the EU. Every year, white girls bombarded with propaganda that promotes interracialism, especially white black males. Cuckish white couples or cuckples even worship the Negro dong. The emasculated white hubby watches his wife getting humped by a Negro. It is the
    Cruci-Dicksion of white man.

    In a free globalized world, racial superiority and inferiority are really decided by women. If white women decide to take black seed and keep producing mulatto black babies, it means black race is superior. You can disagree, I can disagree. But our views would just be a matter of opinion. But the white female decision to accept the black seed as superior(while rejecting white seed as inferior) isn’t just a matter of opinion. It is consequential action that produces new life and decides the future of humanity. When white wombs produce black babies, the life-generator of the white race(white female wombs) have decided blacks are superior to whites. Your minds and tongues can pontificate. But they produce no new life. Only wombs produce new life, and women with wombs, as pathways to the future, get to decide which race is superior in their choice of sexual mates.

    All is race-ist in this world.

    Now, white race-realists might argue that blacks are not superior. They may argue that Whites have higher IQ. That may be true, but if white women prefer black males over white males, it doesn’t matter if white males do have higher IQ. White wombs have decided they want black seed as superior. Black males may have lower IQ but female sexual desire isn’t just about brains. If so, Stephen Hawkings would have been the hottest stud in the world. Women are attracted to raw sexuality. Women are attracted to men for reasons others than geek-nerd ability.

    Indeed, some say that yellows are somewhat smarter than whites, thus ‘superior’ in IQ to whites. But so many yellow wombs prefer to take white seeds than yellow seeds. Thus, yellow wombs are acting on the basis that white race is superior to yellow race. Yellow wombs prefer to produce white babies for white men.

    In the end, racial superiority is determined by reproduction, not high IQ. A smart guy who can’t attract women is a zero. Without access to women, his DNA has met its dead end. It is thus inferior despite higher IQ.
    In our hyper-sexualized world, women increasingly choose mates on the basis of raw sexuality. So, racial superiority is really determined by what turns women on the most. And today, women have individual freedom to choose what her hormones deem as the superior mate whose seeds she will take.

    • 回复: @WorkingClass
  36. Conservatism is failing because it cannot deal with an overcrowded, over indebted, overgrown world and the world will not turn back from that state voluntarily.

    The Left will fail because their “solutions” are a hodge-podge of ad hoc, over complex, anti-nature, attempts at keeping the inevitable collapse from coming.

    大自然蝙蝠最后。

    I believe that the fear of a Trump victory is rational from the viewpoint that he threatens the complex web of international cooperation that is keeping the collapse at bay. Support of Trump is rational from the viewpoint that the cooperation must, and will, eventually break down, the collapse will come, and there is an advantage to dealing with the event in a real world manner.

    People who think that Trump can return us to an earlier day are not dealing with reality.

  37. @juster

    …we aren’t going to win elections with a minority of the population, and the majority is just not going to like DS-type white nationalism.

    The USA would never have existed if its creation depended on a majority. The founders regarded “democracy” as what they saw in France at the time (before Napoleon). What we have now they called the tyranny of the majority.

    That is not to say that there is anything to be done about it besides letting nature take its course.

  38. Priss Factor [又名“多米尼克·弗兰肯学会”] 说: • 您的网站
    @iffen

    David Duke sometimes goes too far, and he tends to overly blame Jews for too much, but he’s been one of the most courageous critics of Jewish power in a long time.

    And some of the things he warned are proving to be true.

    You gotta admit, How Zionists Divide and Conquer has a lot of truth in it.

  39. @iffen

    You’re either naive or jewish. Once the right purges its racists/nazis etc. the left will simply move the line.

  40. Mulegino1 说:

    In 21st Century America, “liberal” means Tweedle-Dem stepping on the gas and “conservative” means Tweedle-GOP occasionally stepping on the brake. The former believes that multicultural utopia is just beyond the horizon, and the latter believes that the new American Century is just up the road. Neither realizes that the car is headed towards the edge of the abyss.

  41. @iffen

    hmm does the left disown hitler stalin mao polpot che peron chavez castro etc etc etc etc -no they make tshirts broadway musicals and Warhol prints of them.you have no enemies to the left not black panthers or NAMBLA , in fact you like and encourage shills to move as far left as concievable get your minions to make art and media normalizing the violence and deviancy and then get the GOP to split the difference – rinse repeat.
    “Fascism “LOL the only remotely fascist leader that was a rightist was franco and he actually neutralized the fascists. Fascism is what happens too democracy as it collapses in a last ditch effort to save it. Trump is what happens way before that.
    “anti semite” whats that even mean well what you mean is those who question the patriotism of jews in the various countries that have adopted them. Its a legitimate topic and a big problem but your tactic is to pretend its all part and parcel of something much uglier.
    “Racist” is a stupid word that basically screams I dont believe in evolution except to beat up Christians who actually discovered the process [Darwin, Mendel,Crick et al] Odd how jews dont accused of creationism. Race is not only skin deep you keep that lie going for the stupid by thuggery because it undermines the entire foundation of progrivism and is a handy political cudgel but CRISPR is coming behold the DARK ENLIGHTENMENT -ALL MEN ARE NOT CREATED EQUAL -NOT EVEN TWO OF THEM

  42. utu 说:

    The term “Leftist-neoconservative” is close but zionist or Jewish “conservative” would be much more precise.

    Irving Kristol (1973)
    “Senator McGovern is very sincere when he says that he will try to cut the military budget by 30%. And this is to drive a knife in the heart of Israel… Jews don’t like big military budgets. But it is now in the interests of the Jews to have a large and powerful military establishment in the United States… American Jews who care about the survival of the state of Israel have to say, no, we don’t want to cut the military budget, it is important to keep that military budget big, so that we can defend Israel.”

    “Large nations, whose identity is ideological, like the Soviet Union of yesteryear and the United States of today, inevitably have ideological interests in addition to more material concerns…. That is why we feel it necessary to defend Israel today, when its survival is threatened. No complicated geopolitical calculations of national interest are necessary.”

    Norman Podhoretz (1979)
    “There was, to be sure, one thing that many of even the most passionately committed American Zionists were reluctant to do, and that was to face up to the fact that continued American support for Israel depended upon continued American involvement in international affairs – from which it followed that an American withdrawal into the kind of isolationist mood that prevailed most recently between the two world wars, and that now looked as though it might soon prevail again, represented a direct threat to the security of Israel.”

  43. iffen 说:
    @The Anti-Gnostic

    The Left has no enemies to its left, and they’ve permanently enacted the welfare state, captured all the institutions and won and continue to win the Culture War.

    Maybe it’s because they have no organized opposition. They might just be winning by default.

  44. @juster

    “People who insist on always talking about “the Jewish question” or “race-mixing” are seriously messing this burgeoning movement up.”

    The ruling class needs the rest of us at each others throats lest we turn our anger on them. Those who make it all about Jews, Negroes or Mexicans have taken the bait. I don’t know how much they are messing anything up. But I do wish they could understand that our common enemy is the .01%.

  45. Avery 说:

    GOTTFRIEDoğlu is another anti-Christian, anti-Armenian, Turkophile, Islamophile denialist Zionist.

    Another disgusting anti-Christian living in Christian America, while shilling for Islamist Turks.

    • 回复: @Priss Factor
    , @5371
  46. Priss Factor [又名“多米尼克·弗兰肯学会”] 说: • 您的网站
    @Avery

    You’re a turd shilling for the toilet.

  47. @Priss Factor

    With respect, race mixing only leads to all of us being the same color. We could all have a claim to having been diminished or enhanced. I live in Louisiana. I often see white men with colored women. Its not a one way street. These feminized white men you refer to must get that way at college. I don’t see them working the oil patch or the paper mills or among the fishermen, farmers and foresters.

  48. Maj. Kong 说:
    @iffen

    I disagree, the essence of the left is people like the Clintons, Larry Summers, Jerry Brown, Tony Blair and the Trudeaus. Making “reasonable” sense on economics, and posing as voices of social moderation and progress. The racial chauvinists and the more extreme socialists like Sanders are largely hangers on. They never really get what they are looking for, just like the social conservatives.

    For most of the left, the only thing you can’t be is to be pro-white. They are willing to tolerate supporters of Palestine BDS, anti-GMOs, gun rights and even those hostile to homosexuality. But the minute a New Dealer like George Wallace started down the racial path, he was out, even though his support was essential to Jimmy Carter’s victory in ’76. That’s the same reason that Barbara Jordan has been forgotten, despite being a lesbian black female. She favored an immigration restriction policy that was against the anti-white racism favored by her side.

    George Bush won twice, so did Ronald Reagan. But society didn’t become more traditionalist. The only thing the Republicans care about is corporate globalization and more wars.

    Until the main axis of the right is spinning around preserving our ethnoreligious civilization, we aren’t going anywhere.

  49. Maj. Kong 说:
    @juster

    Like it or not, the Jewish community carries a lot of moral weight in Western society since 1945. Their record with this moral authority is deeply troubling, as my opinion is that far too many of them want Western society to be blurred out as revenge for the Holocaust. To me, any moral debt owed by the West was paid in full during the Yom Kippur War. In return for having supported Israel against virulent Muslim opposition, I do feel it is worthwhile to ask the diaspora Jews to either agree to defend Western civilization or move to Israel.

    We can’t win anything by worrying about what the left is portraying us as. We should instead focus on portraying them as traitors, and even crypto-Muslims. I think that part of the way that our ideas will become increasingly mainstream is that part of the left could be convinced that the SJW-wing is going too far. This includes the nominally anti-white socon blacks, Asians worried about BLM crime, and liberal Jews concerned about BDS* and Le Grand Remplacement. Also Midwestern blue collar workers and (gasp) government employees.

    *One of the strangest things to me is that the alt-right wants nothing to do with the movement that Israeli Jews appear to fear the most. A viable right-leaning BDS movement would be a worthwhile negotiating gambit.

    • 回复: @Ace
  50. Maj. Kong 说:
    @iffen

    It can be reasonably argued that due to its populist and militaristic nature, that fascism is a heresy for the right. In that regard, I would not consider Franco a fascist.

    Anti-Semitism is as natural to Western civilization as anti-Christianity is to Jewish civilization, Islamic civilization and Japanese civilization. To put it briefly, since the destruction of the Second Temple, Jewish religion has changed from the authority of the Torah to the authority of the Talmud. The latter text is explicitly targeted against the claims of Christianity, just as the Koran is. While you could argue that most Jews aren’t rabbinical scholars, and that reform Judaism is friendlier to Jesus at least as a prophet, I consider that over two thousand years of resentment doesn’t go away easily.

    I’m not arguing that we should bring back Jewish quotas, confiscate their wealth, burn the Talmud or order mass deportations. What I am calling for is an understanding that we believe the claims of Christianity and seek to practice them, as well as continuing our ethnic line and geographic providence. In short, an anti-liberal society which will make those not identifying with it uncomfortable as a non-Mormon would be in Provo, Utah.

    Racism is a Marxist term, it’s a slur, nothing else. Whether we are calling it racial realism or Human biodiversity, it should be an essential component of the right. We are not Young Earth Liberals.

    • 回复: @iffen
    , @Bill
  51. 5371 说:
    @Avery

    What did this piece have to do with Armenians, Turks, Christianity, Islam or Zionism?

    • 回复: @Avery
  52. iffen 说:
    @Maj. Kong

    Very good comments by you. There are many items that I could comment upon but I guess most commenters like to move on. I suspect we are all victims of the just for the moment way of thinking.

    It is true that fascism is a separate case from racism and anti-Semitism.

    I can make a distinction between race realism and racism. If I was a better thinker and writer I should be able to lay it out for others. Maybe I will work on it in the future.

    In a technical, dictionary meaning, everyone (including me) can be considered to be racist, it is a part of being ethnocentric.

    However, just like one can be a patriot and a nationalist without being a fascist, one can be a race realist without being an blatant rabble rousing racist.

    • 同意: Maj. Kong
  53. iffen 说:
    @The Anti-Gnostic

    I read some online information on Richwine and it jogged my memory of the material that I read some time ago about his case. I don’t see anything that would justify his persecution or exclusion. The only sin that I noted was working for Heritage, but that is pardonable.

    I only read the Wiki on Sobran. I don’t see anything there that would make me conclude that he was anti-Semitic. (speculation coming up) I think that considering his profession and where he worked that he likely had frequent contact with Jewish Americans who were blind supporters of Israel and after a while that could skew one’s thinking.

  54. Bill 说:
    @iffen

    The problem isn’t your lack of clarity. It’s your lack of correctness.

    • 回复: @iffen
  55. Bill 说:
    @Maj. Kong

    Yes. Fascism, antisemitism, and racism (as those terms are used in contemporary discourse) are normal right wing positions. To purge people who hold them from the right is to liquidate the right. Which, of course, is the point of purging those people from the right.

  56. iffen 说:
    @Bill

    It’s your lack of correctness.

    Thanks for bringing this to my attention, Bill. I will give your opinion the appropriate consideration.

  57. Avery 说:
    @5371

    你为什么在乎?
    Are you a volunteer UNZ.com moderator?

    Or you have some warm feelings for Dr. GOTTFRIEDoğlu ?
    Or possibly you are buddy-buddies with that Dr of scatology Dominique Turd Society ?

  58. Svigor 说:

    No matter the intention, I and probably some others read your comment as “the Democrats are the real racists” refrain of conservatism inc.

    Reg’s comment aside, saying “we’re the real anti-racists, and the Democrats are the real racists” and “the Democrats are racists” are two very different things. You will never catch me saying the first, but I’ve been saying the second for years.

    Letting any of this stop you from pointing out that the left is racist is a huge mistake.

    • 回复: @Maj. Kong
  59. Svigor 说:

    The ruling class needs the rest of us at each others throats lest we turn our anger on them. Those who make it all about Jews, Negroes or Mexicans have taken the bait. I don’t know how much they are messing anything up. But I do wish they could understand that our common enemy is the .01%.

    How Jewish is that .01%? 50%? 40? 30? Somewhere in there, I’d guess. After you correct for political activism (never mind the solidarity effect), it’s probably more like 60%.

    • 同意: Malcolm X-Lax
  60. Svigor 说:

    We can argue forever about higher IQ and etc, but the future generation will be the product of sexual decisions of free women. Not only Who, Whom, but Woo, Womb.
    And the biggest threat to white race is the Negro because only the Negro man has more manly qualities than white men. And Jews know this, which is why they are promoting interracialism that is mostly about white women rejecting white men and going with black men and using their white wombs to create racially superior black babies.

    You’re wrong about this. Jews promote blacks as suitable mates for white women for a variety of reasons, but foremost among them is the extreme apparent distance involved. In other words, because blacks are as alien a group as the Jews can find. See, if white women are conditioned to think of a group as alien as blacks as eligible partners, then 当然 they’re going to think of Jews as eligible partners. They won’t even notice the small differences involved.

    Jews make blacks eligible partners for whites as a sort of proxy for making Jews eligible. It lets them work from the shadows, which is how they prefer it; Jews never even get mentioned, but they benefit. Same thing goes for a lot of pro-black political machinations from Jews.

  61. Maj. Kong 说:
    @Svigor

    To the uninitiated, it would be understandable for them to accept “The Democrats are racist against whites”. It is a bit hard for some when the Clintons are still at the top, and neither House or Senate leader is nonwhite.

    To a leftist steeped in cultural Marxism, only a white person can be racist, and to some all white people are racist, even Tim Wise. Their definition: power+prejudice. So even a “white ally” is eternally suspect.

  62. Ace 说:
    @iffen

    I see those ludicrous efforts, of course, but they all imply that there is a link, which there isn’t. Just their question When are you going to disavow Duke? is intended as Exh. A establishing the existence of a blood brotherhood.

    No question is posed to Hillary When are you going to disavow the support of Louis Farrakhan? There’s an actual link to Sharpton but no call to disavow him.

    This is grist for a case study on the political ambush.

  63. Ace 说:
    @Maj. Kong

    Very good. I don’t think there was any moral debt “the West” owed (or owes) Jews. Their beef is with the government of one country and, to a lesser extent, a few collaborators and governments elsewhere in Europe.

    As is well known, Jews played a disproportionate role in the Bolshevik revolution and Holodomir and a central role in communist takeover attempts in Hungary, Austria, and Germany after WWI. In the U.S. they were hugely overrepresented in the communist movement. If the West is to be blamed for the acts of the German government it seems a fair question to ask are Jews similarly to be blamed for the acts of some of them?

当前评论者
说:

发表评论-对超过两周的文章发表评论,将在质量和语气上进行更严格的判断


 记得 我的信息为什么?
 电子邮件回复我的评论
$
提交的评论已被许可给 Unz评论 并可以由后者自行决定在其他地方重新发布
在翻译模式下禁用评论
通过RSS订阅此评论主题 通过RSS订阅所有Paul Gottfried的评论