正如伯恩斯坦是犹太人世界的音乐扬，洛伦佐·达庞特是他们的阴。

达庞特 Così Fan Tutte，ossia La Scuola Degli Amanti (All Women Do It, or The School for Lovers) 美丽动人地对比了比西方文化经典中的任何作品都强的文化马克思主义，尽管伯恩斯坦的 吉警官克鲁普克 贬低文化马克思主义也不错。

没有必要对伯恩斯坦的非百老汇生活和工作大发雷霆。 人们只需要听听伯恩斯坦的 质量 在喷气机亲吻克鲁普克警官时尽快解雇他 梦断. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j7TT4jnnWys

with (((Mahler))) – a one-trick pony who wrote only symphonies & a couple of symphonic song cycles – (((Bernstein))) had some strong material to work with. Mahler was a great symphonist…but not a great composer.

the 1st and 2nd symphonies are rock solid, and #’s 3, 5, and 7 have lots of good in them. Though in every case there are stronger performances than Bernstein’s: (((Leinsdorf))) for 1 & 3, (((Klemperer))) for #2, etc.

and I’ll give Bernstein some credit as a conductor. His and Robert Casadesus’ performance of the Saint-Saens 4th piano concerto – alas, now copyright lawyer’d off Utube – is powerful and lucid, just astonishingly perfect. He also championed some relatively un-played non-Jew composers – Carl Nielsen, for one – tho w/o the success he had with Mahler.

off the podium, Bernstein was – as so well documented by Sanderson – the archetypal

颠覆性的犹太人。事实上（像索罗斯一样）现代

马耳他犹太人

Often an ostentatious buttcrack at the podium, and particularly poor at conducting military music,

(https://www.amazon.com/Leonard-Bernstein-Conducts-Great-Marches/dp/B0090S4BZ8/ref=sr_1_2?s=music&ie=UTF8&qid=1545706694&sr=1-2&keywords=bernstein+marches

(I had the earlier release as a kid: stunk on ice) )

Bernstein was a great music educator.

Who can forget this?

I sent this to Ray Davies’ kid. She was gassed!

and…it’s back:

我有点喜欢古典音乐，但我在底特律电台上能找到的一点点东西对我来说通常很烦人。 这篇文章阐明了为什么我的本地收听选择如此有限。

I’ll have to go back and read this article slowly, but just skimming it brings much into focus. While I like Mahler’s first symphony it is nothing special (Wagner’s only symphony, hardly ever played, is infinitely superior) and most of his works I find forgettable at best. I recall hearing a pretentious piece while in a classical store in Ann Arbor, and based on what I knew, concluded that it was Mahler’s 8th, a piece I had never heard. I checked the CD and was right. I’ve never tried to listen to that one again. I’ve tried several times to “get into” Mahler’s 9th and was relieved when I learned that the great Sergiu Celibidache cared so little for Mahler that he never conducted a single piece by him.

Which is not to say the Mahler was not a great conductor. Almost certainly he was. But the same cannot be said for Tilson Thomas. I’ve never cared for anything I’ve heard by him. Joshua Bell’s recording of the Tchaikovsky concerto is ruined by Thomas’ inept conducting.

Hard to say if Bernstein championed Thomas because he was Jewish or because he was homosexual; I suspect the latter, not that those are mutually exclusive. Bernstein certainly championed some great gentile artists like Zimerman and Gould, although admittedly they were (or in Zimerman’s case, are) so gifted that they did not need Bernstein in their corner.

综上所述，伯恩斯坦极具娱乐性并吸引了大众（这并不重要，但门票销售确实重要）。 他有一些不错的录音（他的西贝柳斯不在其中）。 他的流行作品有一些好听的曲调。

Far harder to explain the success of Eugene Ormandy, a boring mediocrity (or perhaps imbecility) who spent four decades running Leopold Stokowski’s glorious Philadelphia Orchestra into the ground.

When it comes to great Jewish conductors, I like Barenboim and Levine, at least when the latter is not making Schubert sound like Berlioz’s Roman Carnival Overture. Particularly in the case of Levine, was his success at all attributable to his being Jewish or sexually / morally depraved? [Levine makes Bernstein look like a monk.] Sort of interesting that both Barenboim and Levine are excellent Wagnerians, perhaps spiritual heirs to Hermann Levi. I’m amazed at how deep resentment of Wagner is among Jews. They seem to think he founded National Socialism. I had an Israeli friend insist that she cannot listen to Wagner because he was played in concentration camps even though even mainstream historians say he was not (she’s my age and couldn’t possibly know first hand, but swears she’s heard from unimpeachable earwitnesses back in Israel). Perhaps Barenboim and Levine were so talented that they ascended the heights despite their love for Wagner.

with (((Mahler))) – a one-trick pony who wrote only symphonies & a couple of symphonic song cycles – (((Bernstein))) had some strong material to work with. Mahler was a great symphonist…but not a great composer.

Haxo, behave yourself. Sibelius was a great symphonist and composer, Mahler wasn’t. It was only in the 1960s, with the collapse in standards, that Mahler started to be played regularly. As radio station Classic FM puts it:
Many find the helter-skelter rides through Mahler’s music uniquely exhilarating. For others the effect is nauseating.

As regards composition, Bernstein was always a minor composer. As a conductor, he was always a tedious, over the top buffoon, who usually detracted from the music.
Bernstein may be World Famous in America.Fortunately, I don’t live in America, so I will miss nearly all this commemorative crap.

Which is not to say the Mahler was not a great conductor. Almost certainly he was.

You are certainly right on that point. Mahler conducted Rachmaninoff ( as pianist ) on his first North American tour and Rach had nothing but praise for Mahler’s care and diligence in conducting his ( Rach’s ) work.

Sibelius and Mahler once had a conversation on what a symphony “should be”:

Mahler: ” a symphony must encompass the world”

Sibelius: “no, a natural landscape is sufficient”

and I think each succeeded quite well on his own terms; Mahler 1,2,3,5,7 are well constructed and for the most part inspired musical psychodrama. Ditto Sibelius 1-5 as nordic landscapes; 6 is more a lightweight sinfonietta and #7 is one movement…because Sibelius had flat run out of inspiration, and shortly thereafter stopped composing altogether.

overall, I’d rate Sibelius the superior composer because he wrote terrific music in more than one form: in addition to the symphonies, numerous symphonic poems and orchestral suites, plus one of the 3 definitively great violin concertos, and much else.

“Bernstein…always a tedious, over-the-top buffoon”

evidently you didn’t listen to the Saint-Saens I linked to above. Bernstein’s versions of the Schuman symphonies are also excellent and, in general, he was reliable with German, French, American, and Nordic standard repertory pieces. With other music – Russian & Italian, for instance – messy and unsatisfactory.

well, you’re evidently online:

youtube has tens of thousands of live and from disc classical music videos, standard and non-standard works. Here’s your concert for today:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=OO1c2PAiWuu

I’m complimented that you quoted me and mortified over my typo! I need to grow thicker skin.
I did not know about the Rach / Mahler connection, thank you. Klemperer was gaga over Mahler as a conductor, but I wonder if part of K’s enthusiasm was to downplay the tremendous influence of Furtwangler, who totally overshadowed K in Europe. Last year, maybe 2, I saw (simulcast) Simon Rattle conduct Tristan at the Met. Rattle studied Mahler’s copy of the score and said that Mahler’s markings opened up the piece.

What is it about Sibelius and Masoni music?

不管他有什么缺点，伯恩斯坦都是一位伟大的指挥家，一位伟大的指挥家，没有两种方式。 他与维也纳爱乐乐团合作的贝多芬交响曲循环是最伟大的贝多芬循环之一，他对第九交响曲的诠释上升到了富特旺格勒第九交响曲的水平。 听听西蒙·拉特 (Simon Rattle) 等人今天推出的平庸票价，然后自己决定。 是的，他在领奖台上表现得非常耀眼，但他确实为古典音乐世界带来了兴奋和娱乐，从而帮助减缓了其吸引力的下降。

他的左派或社会主义属于旧的那种支持弱者、弱者和受压迫者的左派。 我不明白他怎么会被指责为文化马克思主义，尽管他不幸是同性恋。 他为自己的政治观点付出了代价； 他在某个阶段不得不妥协，不应该被用来贬低他的真诚和诚意。

看看今天的古典音乐景观，它变得多么贫瘠！ 没有一个像富特旺格勒、沃尔特、克伦佩勒、卡拉扬、姆拉文斯基这样的巨人。 伯恩斯坦是伟大指挥家中的最后一位，让我们记住（并尊重）他。

Reading about this repugnant, filthy, and monstrously bloated creature (Bernstein) sickened me. In so many ways, Jewish “cultural” influence on language, the arts, and in the media generally has been to bring “culture” down to the level of the gutter.

Agree. Even without knowing about his rampant homosexuality Bernstein struck me as a repugnant exhibitionist–and a mediocrity to boot.

YouTube is a great source for classical music. Start with French mystic and impressionist Claude Debussy. Finnish composer Jean Sibelius has been mentioned in these comments; his symphonies and tone poems are worth a listen.

I like some Bernstein’s recordings and dislike others. Classical listeners, myself definitely included, have an unfortunate tendency to lionize and demonize artists, judging them are all superb or awful. Even poor artists have some good recordings and great artists some turkeys.

The best way to judge a conductor is while listening on the radio because that is so often blinded. I was listening to a performance of Sibelius’ 5th that was so bad that I almost laughed. When it ended and I learned that it was Bernstein, I’m thinking, scratch him off the Sibelius list.

There is a rumor (per Karjan’s biographer the source is Edge Leslie), that after a performance of Sibelius Karajan told Bernstein that he had spent 10 years popularizing Sibelius and that Bernstein had undone all his work in one hour. The biographer doubts that this story is true, but it does show that dislike of Bernstein’s Sibelius is not rare.

But if you like Bernstein’s Sibelius, then fine. Enjoy it.

Glenn Gould had a famous relationship with Bernstein (that was not contentious as some believe) but Gould did say that he rated George Szell (whom Gould actually did dislike) to be the better conductor.

That there are no great conductors today may be true, but it may be an artefact of senescence. I am far too old to learn and admire new coductors like I could in my youth. I will say that anybody who lists great conductors and does not include Celibidache is fortunate, because they have a treasure chest waiting to be opened (given that Celibidache eschewed recordings, I only know about him because of an eccentric mentor). I liked Giuseppe Sinopoli, his early death was a blow to music. And I’ve heard some amazing Shostakovich from Semyon Bychkov. Incidentally, a successor as Music Director of the Grand Rapids Symphony Orchestra is David Lockingon, currently laureate. I’ve never heard Lockington conduct, but I have heard him perform some of his own chamber music compositions, and as a composer he is not easily dismissed.

本文中有很多信息材料，但犹太角度太过分了。

Yes, many Jews got a leg-up in the system due to connections and favoritism from fellow tribesmen. Leonard Bernstein is a perfect example of this. His Jewishness and homosexuality certainly didn’t hurt him in the business. His only lasting contribution to the Arts was score for WEST SIDE STORY, which is schmaltz but of a high kind.

As for Aaron Copland, there’s no denying that APPALACHIAN SPRINGS is a genuine American masterpiece and a deeply moving portrait of Protestant America. Also, even though communism was a disaster wherever it came to power, maybe it was not the worst thing in non-communist nations. It’s like we wouldn’t want to live in a Christian Theocracy but Christianity in secular nations have provided balance to materialism and temporalism.
由于智商较高且神经质，犹太人是天生的精英主义者和怪人。因此，如果没有犹太教或共产主义（或基督教作为犹太人的皈依宗教），犹太人往往会放弃所有的抑制并屈服于过度的自我专注和自我放纵。因此，共产主义（至少在非共产主义国家）对犹太人的利己主义具有抑制作用。信奉共产主义的犹太人感到一种内在的压力，要关心人民、群众、工人等等。人类兄弟情谊的事情。
But this was also true of Protestantism and its work ethic in American history. The natural propensity of American History has been Winners over Losers, the land of opportunity where anyone can go from rags to riches, a kind of Social Darwinism. Winners win, losers lose, and that’s that. Globalism is this kind of Americanism on a worldwide scale.
Protestantism, in contrast, suppressed overt egotism and reminded generations of Anglo-Americans to be concerned with spirituality and morality as well as with materialism and individualism. Then perhaps, Copland’s admiring portrait of Protestant early America had something to do with his communist ethos. One thing for sure, communism restrained homo tendencies that are naturally capitalist, elitist, and egotistical. Same was true of Pasolini, an Italian homo whose communism kept him REAL to some extent. But with the fading of communism, look how Jewish homos just became ridiculous overripe fruits. Commie homos believed there was something higher than homo narcissism: Justice for the Masses. In contrast, globo-capitalist homos believe in only one thing: Juice for the Asses.

As for Mahler, he was a true giant. Along with Sibelius and Shostakovich(and maybe Prokofiev), he embodied that most interesting borderline between Romanticism and Modernism, with fullness of passion and proclivity for adventurism. I appreciate Sanderson’s anti-PC dissection of Jewish influence and connection, but let’s not reduce all Jewish achievements to incestuous tribalism. Mahler was a great great artist.
While some Jewish figures clearly relied on Jewish networking for prominence and momentary success, there’s no denying the explosion of lotsa great Jewish talent in the 20th century.

此外，犹太批评家过去也为推广非犹太艺术家做了很多工作。约翰·福特和霍华德·霍克斯的巨大声誉归功于许多批评家和学者，其中许多人恰好是犹太人。犹太评论家对英格玛·伯格曼、卡尔·德雷叶、安德烈·塔可夫斯基高度评价（尽管他有着深厚的基督民族家庭保守主义）。直到最近，许多犹太评论家还对 DW Griffith 给予高度评价。宝琳·凯尔经常将《一个国家的诞生》称为一部伟大的作品。
甚至莱妮·里芬斯塔尔 (Leni Riefenstahl) 在 60 年代和 70 年代的艺术圈中也享受到了复兴，这正是苏珊·桑塔格 (Susan Sontag) 觉得有必要在结构主义文章《迷人的法西斯主义》中攻击她的原因，她在文章中认为，对强大的非洲黑人的新崇拜只是雅利安至上主义主题的重构。

Also, the reputations of certain Jewish artists came to rest more on test-of-time than Jewish cultural ‘nepotism’. Many of Kubrick’s works were roundly dismissed, often by Jewish critics. THE SHINING had many detractors, but it’s one of those works that grew larger over time. And we mustn’t fall for the fallacy that just because there was key Jewish support for a Jewish artist, the reputation owes mainly to such favorable attention. After all, things of little value fade from the scene, no matter how highly they were praised in their time. No matter how much Jews praise something, it will be forgotten if it sucks.

I sent this to Ray Davies’ kid. She was gassed!

Mixolydian or not, “You Really Got Me” is just noisy, fake-American trash. Davies was at his best when most English. “Dedicated Follower of Fashion” nails people like Bernstein. Being banned from the US for five years probably helped a lot.

Like most modern and postmodern “artists”, Bernstein was at 他的 best when he was being silly, and tedious when serious.

Did you know that Charles was Burl’s fifth cousin? And James Merritt Ives was their cousin, along with Frederick Law Olmstead.

阿巴拉契亚之春是美妙的，尤其是由 Ani 和 Ida Kavafian 充满活力的二人组（向因特洛兴艺术学院大喊！）的原创管弦乐录音。

然而，一个必要的限定词：科普兰没有写出任何让它如此讨人喜欢的曲调。

也许是时候更新瓦格纳的音乐中的犹太教了。

应该可以考虑，伟大的欧洲古典作曲家让他们的后代无处可去。 而是像伟大的希腊古典艺术家。 他们之后的作品只能是patische。 谁能超越贝多芬？ 然后通过历史的自然过程，古典作曲家回到了音乐的根源。 吉普赛人，黑人灵性，白人工人阶级摆弄。 犹太人在这方面是一流的。 《我的奋斗》实际上对犹太音乐进行了一些间接的致敬。 它把它描述为原始的和派生的。 确切地。 除了作为他们的货币生产者之外，犹太人在说唱中失去了它。

Spot on. A silly, guilty pleasure: Natalie Dessay singing Bernstein’s Glitter and Be Gay. At her peak nobody could do crazy / glamorous — or those high notes — better than Natalie.

I did say that Bernstein ” usually detracted from the music”. I should have added – except when he actually did a good job. Regardless, that didn’t stop him being a tedious, over the top buffoon.
As regards Mahler, there seems no doubt that he was a great conductor, one of the finest of his era. We have Rachmaninoff and other composers to testify to that.

In their famous exchange, Sibelius said: ” I admire the symphony’s style and severity of form, as well as the profound logic creating an inner connection among all of the motives,” wheras Mahler said: “The symphony is like the world; it must embrace everything.”

All artistic forms, like the Symphony, have their own framework and logic and Sibelius grasped them intuitively. Mahler didn’t. I often think of Mahler as a forerunner of post-Classical composers like Malcolm Arnold. They can produce some excellent movements and single pieces, but the whole work is disjointed and of disparate parts. Arnold’s Guitar Concerto is a case in point. The finale, the Rondo is one of the finest of its kind. The 1st and 2nd movements are a mish mash and most guitarists only play the Rondo.
You are right about the much greater variety of Sibelius’ music. As well as the forms you mentioned, Sibelius also produced a lot of top class incidental music for plays – Peleas and Melisande for example. His only rival amongst the great composers in this department is Purcell.
He also wrote a lot of piano music, championed by the likes of Ashkenazy, as well as songs and chamber pieces, the last now neglected.

我不熟悉阿诺德，但你对脱节整体的描述肯定适合马勒。

你对珀塞尔的评论让我想起了在巴赫之前创作的丰富音乐，他很可能是最伟大的。 把我们的时间花在过去的大师身上，不禁为真正伟大的音乐提供了急需的视角。

As for Bernstein the conductor, I was thinking — how much was even him? When he would come to Ann Arbor, Detroit’s big shot music critic (whom I am not about to name) would rave about his performances. But according to my savant-level friend who knew more about classical music than anybody I’ve ever met or even known of, Bernstein would just send in his assistant to rehearse the orchestra. Bernstein would only show up for the performance.

JS Bach 用一只手在地板上敲击尺子，用另一只手演奏大键琴来指挥他的室内乐。

Leonard Bernstein is the quintessential beneficiary of Jewry’s nepotism and ethnocentric narcissism. The conductor can be good, even great. But he can never turn a musical sow’s ear into a silk purse.

这就是勋伯格永远无法与瓦格纳或莫扎特相提并论的原因。 严肃的音乐——在其内在核心——是纯粹的形式，不能像流行的垃圾一样被操纵来欺骗大众，它依赖于节拍和名人崇拜。

有很多好的民间音乐是有机的。 犹太人没有什么审美品味，对良好的有机文化一无所知，只知道建立在名人驱动的扭曲和丑陋形式的细菌上。

‘…He arrived in the middle of a tense conflict between rival Jewish groups over how best to achieve the independent Jewish state mandated by the Balfour Declaration…’

It’s almost tedious how even those who would decry Jewish and Zionist influence wind up unconsciously imbibing and parroting the propaganda.

The Balfour declaration did not ‘mandate a Jewish state.’ It referred only to a ‘Jewish National Home’ — and everyone at the time, including the Zionists, agreed this in no way meant or implied an independent state. Chaim Weizman assured all and sundry of this at Versailles. All that was desired or intended was a Jewish community in Palestine, with its own schools, newspapers, economic cooperatives, etc. No independent state. No sirree.

Moreover and in any case, the Balfour Declaration didn’t ‘mandate’ anything. It referred to a territory that wasn’t even held by Britain yet, and merely observed that His Majesty’s government ‘looked with favor’ on the establishment of such a National Home.

I’ll readily agree I ‘look with favor’ on the concept of you suddenly coming into a million dollars. That by no means implies that I feel obliged to give it to you, or even do anything to help you get it. However, I’ll certainly look benignly on if you happen to acquire it.

‘…Jews of communist persuasion felt an inner pressure to care about the People, the masses, the workers, and etc. The Brotherhood of Man thing…’

Witness the loving attention they lavished on the kulaks, etc.

但据我的专家级朋友说，他对古典音乐的了解比我见过甚至认识的任何人都多，伯恩斯坦只会派他的助手来排练管弦乐队。 伯恩斯坦只会出现在表演中。

Thank you for that information – it’s not something you read in the biographies or laudatory reviews. It is consistent with Bernstein being bored with the mundane aspects of conducting. He was a Showman who only turned up for the Show. He was drinking heavily in his last decades and his personal life was a mess, so these were obviously contributory factors

Malcolm Arnold composed the scores for 100 films, including such classics as Bridge On the River Kwai.
His Guitar Concerto starts promisingly and then loses its way. Some critics see the influence of Django Reinhardt ?! in the second movement, the Lento, but I think that’s a bit far fetched. Anyway, the third movement, the Con Brio, is a Rondo in traditional Spanish style and is a classic of the guitar repertoire. You’ve probably heard it without knowing the title.
Overall, it’s like the composer has cannibalised 5 or 6 works and thrown them into one concerto.

Witness the loving attention they lavished on the kulaks, etc.

Kulaks were seen as the rich class.

Today, Jewish globalists carry out mass killings in service of America’s kulak class on Wall Street and Hollywood.

‘Kulaks were seen as the rich class.’

Kulaks were seen as what they were; the leaders of the peasantry.

To crush and enslave the peasantry, the kulaks had to be destroyed.

I believe that Anon’s comment was based upon the premise that in a democratic society, Communist movements appealed to class identities and to some of the squishier adherents of Christianity. But once in power the humanist mask would come off and the true misanthropic nature would reveal itself. Hence the treatment of the kulaks and other Wrongthinkers in the Soviet Union. Italian voters tended vote Communist in municipal elections (particularly in the industrial and academic north) due to the well-deserved reputation for corruption of the Christian Democrats. In national elections they tended to be wary of Communist-led governments, and thus voted CD, Socialist (PSI) or other parties.

A really great tour de force, this. The influence of Bernstein and the role of American Jews in classical music are woven together rather well. I had no idea that the commenters had such in-the-weeds knowledge of the field. Sadly–or wisely–I realize that, as much as I enjoy most sub-types of classical music, I have much to learn.

阿门，北卡罗来纳州

但据我的专家级朋友说，他对古典音乐的了解比我见过甚至认识的任何人都多，伯恩斯坦只会派他的助手来排练管弦乐队。 伯恩斯坦只会出现在表演中。

FWIW，我从为费城管弦乐团和其他古典乐团的成员修理某些乐器的人那里听到了类似的故事。

Bernstein, like honorary Jew Zubin Mehta, was a showman, a performer. Compare their “conducting” performances to this:

Shred-enza 于 6:45 开始。

I’m probably one of the few people alive who can remember where I was, what I was doing, and what I did next when it was announced that Papa Richter had died.

Bernstein would never get the accolades he gets if he were gentile and heterosexual.

The guy was an embarrassing clown who wrote absurdly derivative, utterly inconsequential music.

A la Einstein & so many others, another fake ‘genius Jew’.

“Leonard Bernstein and the Jewish Cultural Ascendency”

Any culturally ascendent Jews around these days? Or actually culturally ascendent anyone.

how best to achieve the independent Jewish state mandated by the Balfour Declaration.

Weird how even in this critical article it is assumed that the Balfour declaration said anything about a jewish state.
The words used were ‘national home’, what legally means nothing.
King Saud at the time interpreted it as a jewish province in Palestine.

As far as I know in the Mandate GB got over Palestina after WWI there also was nothing about a jewish state.
Mandate legally at the time was temporal rule until independence.
This of course was a fig leaf for colonialism, but nevertheless, legally temporal rule.

In the memoirs of first British High Commissioner Samuel one also finds nothing about a jewish state, on the contrary, Samuel blames Weizmann and other radical zionists for their intentions to make Palestine exclusively jewish.
Rt。 老公塞缪尔子爵。 PC，GCB，GBE，Hon。 DCL（牛津）。 老公牛津巴利奥尔学院院士，《回忆录》，伦敦，1945年

Pity few here read German, a book about Galician jews who went to Vienna at the end of the 19th century, railways made many jewish middlemen superfluous, describes jewish political (?) activities.
Hödl writes that any Galician jew in Vienna, the assimilated Viennese jews had seen with horror their brethren arrive, was member of two or three jewish organisations, with weekly meetings.
One might think that impoverished migrants had better things to do.
克劳斯·霍德尔（KlausHödl），“在利奥波德施塔特的阿尔·比特勒（Als Bettler in die Leopoldstadt）”，维也纳加里齐谢·尤登·德姆·韦格·纳赫
Bettler = beggar

A kulak just was a farmer, with a farm.

Chaim Weizman assured all and sundry of this at Versailles. All that was desired or intended was a Jewish community in Palestine

An excellent liar, Weizmann, see my comment

HAHAHA! The author is disillusion …. Bernstein was no genius–far from it: MEDIOCRITY personified!

Now, in the halls of Jewish composers Felix Mendelssohn can be argued to be the best of the Jewish musicians (although not a trend setter by any means, competent for sure)–a child prodigy:

Violin Concerto in E minor:

Ahhh JS Bach–one of the greatest composers that has ever blessed us with his Genius–unlike the author sponsored Bernstein. May I indulge in a few of Bach’s works for the readers here:

Brandenburg Concertos full:

Shred-enza 于 6:45 开始。

I suppose this is your cynical ploy of what one would term a ‘cadenza’. LOL….

Bernstein succeeded in making his influence and his politics felt in popular music. One of the great unacknowledged myths of pop music in the 1970’s was that of Janice Fink, a protege (of sorts) of Bernstein who was renamed Janice Ian. A whole generation of pop music fans took Janice’s song 在十七岁 to heart. They were led to believe that he lyrics, “love was made for beauty queens” and not for “ugly ducklings like me,” came from first hand experience. They were sure that she spent most of her high school years as a social reject, a lonely recluse in her room waiting desperately for phone calls. They presumed that the heartbreak and pain of that early experience created the thoughtful song that Janice wrote and sang. But it was affectation.

In reality, Janice spent her high school years – and earlier – appearing on the Ed Sullivan Show and working on a music career that was being nurtured by the most famous classical musician in the world – Leonard Bernstein. So she wasn’t exactly the wall flower that the song implied she was, and, as a result, not exactly what you would call unpopular, either. At age fourteen, she told her parents she was changing her strange and ugly last name to further her music career (don’t try Free Introduction at home, kids) and wrote and recorded her song 社会的孩子, which was about a white teenage girl who was impregnated by a black guy. Bernstein used his influence to force the song onto play lists on rock stations, largely because it reflected his politics and world view, and so it became a minor hit for Janice.

This was about ten years before 在十七岁 came out, so the public had mostly forgotten about the bold and prodigious 14 year old Janice Ian when the “quiet and reflective” Janice Ian regained the spotlight. I think 在十七岁 was the song of the year, or received a grammy or something.

The first movement of the 5th is the greatest moment of the Brandenburg concertos, one of the sunny summits of our civilization! Pure joy out of a culture from which the cultural toxicity of Jewry as an influence has been excised.

Really, if you are going to debunk a genius, try to choose someone who patently isn’t one, Jewish or not.

The first error that struck me in the passage you quote was the use of the word “mandated”. The Balfour Declaration was clearly drafted to avoid any mandate to anyone to do anything definite.

Your description of the Galician Jews in Vienna makes them sound rather like the young Hitler from his account in Mein Kampf of his years before 1914 in Vienna.

Who were the Jews, or what were the elements of Jewish culture, whose influence had been excised to allow pure joy from the culture of which Bach was a part?

Bernstein’s Sibelius was very hit & miss (like everything else he did). But at his best, he could be great. There’s a live VPO 7th where he keeps both himself and his orchestra under firm control and turns in a shattering performance:

The ebb & flow of tension leading up to each of the three times that Thor throws his hammer (6:37, 12:49, 20:38) is just tremendous.

…I’m making this sound too lurid or sexual? It is sort of sexual, but it’s with a hundred people.”

What’s with these cats and “sex”, anyway? Maybe the mohel shouldn’t have molested their foreskins.

Here, courtesy of our very own UR, is another pervert obviously obsessed with perverted”sex” with little girls; hundreds of them. It’s a must watch for those who believe gubbermint exists to protect us peons.

https://www.unz.com/video/democracynow_perversion-of-justice-the-shocking-story-of-a-serial-sex-abu/

Without government, who’d protect the pervs???

第一和第二交响曲坚如磐石……

马勒没有什么太有趣的东西可以提供。例如，No.2 非常需要一名编辑。如果把时间缩短到半个小时左右，它的重复性和夸张性就不会那么烦人了。如果它是“坚如磐石”，我想这只能意味着它会像石头在水中一样快速沉入音乐桶的底部。

…Ditto Sibelius 1-5 as nordic landscapes; 6 is more a lightweight sinfonietta and #7 is one movement…because Sibelius had flat run out of inspiration, and shortly thereafter stopped composing altogether…

No, no, no. Among other things, there’s nothing “lightweight” about the 6th. Ralph Vaughan Williams considered it Sibelius’ greatest, and I tend to agree. And the idea that the 7th is in one movement “because Sibelius had flat run out of inspiration” is flat out absurd.

“The Silence of Järvenpää” had nothing to do with a loss of inspiration. It had everything to do with…other things. It all makes for a very sad story.

As I aged, I grew to loathe Leonard Bernstein’s behavior as an individual, but I remain grateful for his Young People’s Concerts (I was one of the young then) and my introduction to the work of Charles Ives (2nd symphony) and Lukas Foss (Time Cycle) in my teens.

As for Theodore Adorno and the Frankfurt School in general, their nefarious influence on Western culture and civilization can never be overestimated.

…and a mediocrity to boot.

I think they know it too and for some of them it contributes to their common obsession with “being somebody.”

His personality was marked by “consuming ambition…

Many give over-the-top exhibitionists a bad name, and they seem to be in our faces 24/7/365. We goyim would do well to develop an acute sense of garbage detection and avoidance if not outright suppression.

American culture? Please don’t call it culture.

“毕竟，没有什么价值的东西会逐渐从舞台上消失，无论它们在当时受到多么高度的赞扬。不管犹太人多么赞扬某样东西，如果它很糟糕，就会被遗忘。”

确切地。我想到了索尔·贝娄和诺曼·梅勒的作品。

A kulak just was a farmer, with a farm.

Pardon another display of my ignorance, and correct me if I’m wrong again, but weren’t they generally the more 成功 farmers, such as those rich enough to hire help? Also, wasn’t the word used by the Bolshies, as an insult basically meaning “tightwad” or “cheapskate” which gave the Bolshies an excuse to exterminate another part of the potential competition?

I believe the point is significant.

伟大的文章。

The parallels between modern organised Jewry and ‘MAESTRO 1’ during his twilight years are unmistakable. If feels like we’re all getting groped and crotch-grabbed by a gaggle of eternally wounded, self-centered, undeserving degenerates. Who would have thought that failing upwards breeds hubris and decline.

犹太人的事情，它并不过分，尽管对于我们中许多没有种族意识（因为犹太人）而言，无论我们现在有多红，读起来都不舒服。
无论是 Ron Unz 还是 Kevin Macdonald 写的这类作品真正低估的是失去的机会。 发生的事情是有史以来最伟大的文明——欧洲，一个几千年来崛起成为全球霸权的文明，在过去的两个世纪里不断被犹太人篡夺。盗窃已经够糟糕了，忘恩负义太可怕了，但已经失去的是欧洲人在那个被占领的空间里本来会做的事情。这不是犹太人是否公平竞争的问题，这不是重点，像欧洲人一样伟大的民族应该是站不住脚的被另一个人统治，世界应该被剥夺我们的果实。 无论犹太人的才能让他在自己的土地上实践，而我们在我们自己的土地上实践。
what has happened is a people whos central genetic strategy is trust and openness has been targeted by a people whose central strategy is cohesion and parasitism. theres nothing inherently wrong i either strategy a species lives by any means it can both have the seeds of their destruction in them and one will be colonized if not carefeul the other will kill its host – ok both have happened but could still be undone, the jews must go, its too bad really it might have been ok if they were happy contributing and controlling a proportionate share or assimilated but they are incapable they must go. fortunately they have again gone to far and almost destroyed us and we are again waking up so what always happens will again happen and the jews will say poor us we are always picked on this time however i doubt we will let a single one stay in our lands and they and their arab cousins cna entertain each other from now on.

Americans call them hillbillies, rednecks, or white trash. I call them neighbors, friends, and family.

来源： https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._D._Vance

CCR-Susie Q

ADL to the Woodshed.

http://www.ancreport.com/report/adl-is-mafia-connected-and-defended-pedophile-rapist-and-murderer-leon-frank/

All I know is, this endless “Centennial Celebration” year has sounded like a hundred years of cats being strangled — both his own compositions and the endless interviews with his remaining family. Is it finally safe to turn the radio back on? I wonder in dread who else might be turning 100 in the next year or two to haunt the classical world.

I will give Lenny his due as a conductor — that Shosty’s Fifth is still the best.

[It’s very bad practice to regularly clutter up comment-threads with totally off-topic videos. Perhaps you would be much happier leaving for a different website.]

the 1st and 2nd symphonies are rock solid, and #’s 3, 5, and 7 have lots of good in them. Though in every case there are stronger performances than Bernstein’s: (((Leinsdorf))) for 1 & 3, (((Klemperer))) for #2, etc.

Leinsdorf in the 1st & 3rd? Seriously?

No – for 1 & 3, it’s Horenstein. For 2 I’ll go along with Klemperer. For 4 it’s Szell. For 5 & 6 it’s Barbirolli. For 7 it’s Klemperer (a truly wild & crazy performance of a truly wild & crazy symphony). For 9 it’s Walter, preferably in the miraculous restoration of his 1939 VPO performance by Andrew Rose at Pristine Classical – but, failing that, his early 60’s Columbia recording will do.

The 8th has never quite been done justice in any recording I know of. Horenstein ’59 and Bernstein ’66 probably come the closest to the necessary sense of occasion, but both fall short sound-wise.

Not that I ever got far into the aptly named *Bellow*, too convoluted, fake, and dull by far.

It is now time for me to move on. I am through, posting at UR.

In my understanding the word kulak was just a bolsjewist propaganda trick to expropriate any farmer with a farm and land.
Do suppose these farmers had employees.

It begins with Abraham…

Maybe she wrote “At Seventeen” for another Janis… Joplin!

The greatest talent of the Jew is to recognize that he hasn’t got any and to use the genuine article for his material benefit even it doesn’t belong to him…

Sibelius was Grand Master of the Lodge of Finland and Sweden. That may be the reason he composed Masonic music.

Christian civilization and culture had been healthily immunized against the Jewish collective for well over a thousand years. The Jews of that period were safely ensconced in their shtetls and their leaders were arguing over matters of moment such as whether it was permitted to kill a flea or a louse on the Sabbath.

Growth from Greek to Italy. From Italy to Germany, from Germany to Jews, down worth.

[…] the jews must go, […] i doubt we will let a single one stay in our lands and they and their arab cousins [can] entertain each other from now on.

That’s cruel. Not to the Jews but to the Palestinians.

而阿拉伯人是 不能 他们的堂兄弟。 他们是欧洲人，阿拉伯人是闪米特人。

犹太人不能去。 他们无处可去。 简单地禁止未经同意的生殖器切割。

有人刚刚在这里或附近（可能是 Mondoweiss）写道，今天美国犹太人的数量只是特拉维夫恐怖分子数量的一小部分，XNUMX 万对 XNUMX 万或类似的数字。 美国犹太人正在迅速消失。

所以，和他们交朋友吧。 爱他们。

For me only Verdi is worth listening to. Maybe Puccini, Berlioz, and Tchaikovsky is worth listening twice. All the rest is only Flight of the bumble bee. West side story was not worth listening even once. Strauss was at least innovative.

I knew thae he was bad. I didn’t realize how awful he was.

Well, his reading of Beethoven’s Fifth (and Ninth) are still Numero Uno IMHO.

The Jews must NOT go. They have nowhere to go.

When they got equal rights in the 19th century the idea was that they would disappear through assimilation.
Had they done that, they could have remained where they were
In theory the possibility still exists

Sorry, I got the numbers wrong.

There are roughly 6.5 million Jews in Israel. There are roughly 5.7 million Jews in America.

Second-hand quote by Philip Weiss on 5 Jan 2019, his article, ‘NYT’ runs article about US Jews abandoning Israel that calls two-state solution ‘a cruel joke’.

“In 1950, the head of the Republican National Committee warned that “the sexual perverts who have infiltrated our government in recent years” were “as dangerous as the actual communists.” Human Events, a newsletter read in power circles in Washington, D.C., declared in 1952: “By the very nature of their vice,” homosexuals “belong to a sinister, mysterious, and efficient international.” A 1951 article in H.L. Mencken’s American Mercury insisted publishing was under homosexual control, producing a literary culture that was “chic, artificial, and possibly effeminate,” thereby abetting a “gradual corruption of all aspects of American culture.”[A30]”

All of that was true then. And those supposedly were the good ole days.

And this is the time when everybody needs to understand how gay the world of elite Britain had become no later than the Victorian era. America’s WASP Elites became as queer friendly as their Brit peers starting in the Gay (18)90s. Like their gay friendly Brit WASP peers, the gay friendly Yank WASPs began calling for birth control with a focus on seeing the whites they most despised have smaller families. And like their pro0gay Brit WASP elite peers, the pro-gay Yank WASPs were decidedly pro-Semitic.

And then the Reformation changed all that, with each subsequent revolution (Anglo-Saxon Puritan, French, Bolshevik) making it worse.

The greatest talent of the Jews is to recognize what will make money and what will not.

迷人的文章。很多事情我从来不知道，但我确信下次我听到乐谱时我的想法会改变 梦断.

我和我的兄弟姐妹在成长过程中接触了各种各样的音乐。父母坚持让我们学习乐器，为我们打开了所谓古典音乐的世界。我们还听了大乐队爵士乐、乡村/西部音乐、流行音乐和摇滚乐、Tejano、conjunto、墨西哥流浪乐队以及吉尔伯特和沙利文的音乐。在我们参加的罗马天主教堂的男子和男孩合唱团中唱歌，让我接触到了格里高利圣歌和其他类型的优秀礼拜音乐。

每当哥伦比亚广播公司播出伦纳德·伯恩斯坦青年音乐会时，我母亲总是坚持让我们观看。我们四个人普遍觉得它们很无聊，并认为伯恩斯坦是个自大的混蛋，尽管我很确定我们没有以这种方式向父母表达这种情绪。

scratch a jew artist
发现
much ado ’bout nuthin’

碰！

Toscanini tops ’em all. Perhaps I say that because his recordings were those from which I learned about Beethoven, but I like to believe I’m objective and would place von Karajan second. Bernstein shone with the moderns, but Boulez shone more brightly. Not sorry to be missing the centennial.

i should apologize
jew entitled to greatness
as well as welfare

Interesting article. Although I don’t share the author’s obsessions (misojudaism, gay scare) & I am absolutely not qualified to give an informed opinion on the subject (my musical education is close to zero & I’m basically a barbarian re this field), I’ll address a few issues..

I think that Mahler was a great composer & I’ve enjoyed some of his works. The same can be said about other composers not many seem to enjoy (Bruckner, Hildegard of Bingen, Gesualdo da Venosa, Faure, ..). On the other hand, I don’t care about operas.

Bernstein- I didn’t know he composed anything. Alright, I’ve learned something… He looks like an important promoter & educator of music & I guess his legacy will remain there. His Jewish-gay angle is interesting, but I am not too fascinated by it.

What I am fascinated with is his energy. There are people who have boundless vitality (sometimes helped by drugs) & Bernstein is one of them. How he managed to do so much, spend so much time wasting his life on weird obsessions & live so long?

As R.L. Stevenson said: professor of energy, for such types.

Great explorer, adventurer, translator…. Richard Francis Burton was one of them (perhaps gay, too). How such people have these almost super-human reservoirs of energy is, at least to me, truly intriguing. There are true geniuses with endless amounts of energy (Caesar, Napoleon, Euler, Grothendieck,..), while others are comparatively lazy (Descartes, Einstein,..).

As for social setting, 60ies/70ies was a remake, just with more nihilism & perviness of roaring 20ies & jazz age. Bernstein’s politics was, from what I’ve read, typical irresponsible leftism- but, this is another question.

fortunately they have again gone to far and almost destroyed us and we are again waking up so what always happens will again happen and the jews will say poor us we are always picked on this time however i doubt we will let a single one stay in our lands

this time someone else will be writing the narrative, someone else will control the media

“We’ll go to the little boy’s room and find out who the real Jew is” — Bobby Fisher, when a reporter accused him of being a self-hating Jew. At least that’s the way I remember it; I can’t find his actual words anywhere.

But I was able to find his 1984 letter to the Encyclopedia Judaica, in which he wrote, “I am not today, nor have I ever been a Jew, and as a matter of fact, I am uncircumcised.”

As he did on the chess board, Fisher went right for the jugular. Jews can’t claim that circumcision is the most important covenant and then claim that a proudly uncircumcised person of Jewish ancestry is a Jew.

And please don’t argue that one can be a Jew and not be religious. Of course! Most Jews are not religious — but they still circumcise. It is not a covenant with God, but a covenant with other Jews, a covenant of Jewish tribal identity.

I agree with rabbis who argue that Judaism cannot exist without circumcision. I also wonder how much the covenant explains about Jews. What type of person would be filled with joy hearing their son scream while his genitals are being mutilated? https://parenting.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/05/31/i-enjoyed-my-sons-bris/
一些传统主义者甚至坚持认为这种仪式需要莫赫勒从阴茎中吸血。

我了解到犹太人诚实地相信他们是美国受迫害的少数群体，即使 . . . 在这里插入一百万个反例。 就在今天，我了解到新参议院的第一个法案将试图将在以色列撤资定为犯罪。
https://www.democracynow.org/2018/12/18/glenn_greenwald_congress_is_trying_to

I can’t help but believe that participating in the mutilation of their sons does not establish a remarkable ability for denial, for not seeing obvious truths, for not noticing blatant contradictions in thinking.

这与费利克斯·门德尔松有什么关系？

门德尔松不是犹太人。

In 1809 Christendom existed. Christians considered circumcision to be a bloody, barbaric practice. Jews who left Judaism left it for Christianity (unlike today where there exist only palimpsests of Christianity amidst a Judaized culture). Although Mendelssohn was from a most prominent Jewish family, his parents had left the tribe, and — like Bobby Fisher — he was almost certainly not circumcised.

Because he was brilliant (albeit, as you said, not a trendsetter — his style was to be overwhelmed by the colossal genius born four years later in Leipzig) Jews have claimed him as their own. In doing so they have ironically been aided by Adolf Hitler (whom Wilhelm Furtwangler supposedly referred to as “that goddamned Austrian”) who banned his works as decadent.

I was attracted to classical european music as a boy when I heard first Handel’s Messiah, then Beethoven’s sixth symphony.

I hated the Catholic church in which I grew and walked out as soon as I could..yet kept going back for Christmas eve mid-night mass, because the nearby cathedral had a solid choir and did justice to the Messiah

Later on I really got into Beethoven not from a technical angle but just listening and beefing up on general knowledge of him and his work. I have never lost interest in the Sixth symphony, the Pastoral’ which of course all you people know. Beethoven made natural sense to me, a celebration of ordinary social life, ordinary people

then Beethoven’s Ninth which is probably one of the most incredible musical achievements of all, probably never to be surpassed

I then ‘discovered Joseph Hayden and get into him when I have the time, usually around Christmas which matters only as a time of getting together with people I know, some of whom I see few and far between

but there I have determined to stay with European classical music. I heard Bernstein many years ago and it was a jumble to me. seemed to me he was celebrated because he was Jewish, could do something and whether it was good or not they made him into a hit. he was not good.

Handel, Hayden and Beethoven seemed by far the best to me and I could afford to leave the rest.. left them I have

Leonard Berstein has been a major influence on my life. His young people’s shows influence my love for classical music. His musical West Side Story encouraged us to form a street gang called the Jets and drive the PRs out of our neighborhood.

James Levine was soooo very feted as director at Metropolitan opera.
Something about him seemed creepy to me. I even complained when he was interviewed for 45 min. in the middle of an HD presentation. I was roundly hissed.

It wasn’t the wheelchair.
Nor his avoirdupois.
Something about the whole package. I initially ascribed the feeling to Jews being Jews and overdoing it.
Then — the pedophilia.
https://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/how-power-works-the-james-levine-case/
我明白。
Somehow, you can’t hide ugly.
And, he’s gone.

Don’t let the door hit you —

The new guy at Metropolitan Opera is also gay.
Seems to be a requirement for admission.

I don’t think Donald Palumbo the magnificent choral master at Met is gay —

Totally agree. Overrated, like Hollyweird!

They get famous because their Jewish brethren promote them over others. Nepotism? The tribe has to reign supreme always

There was a program about Mendelssohn on British television around the time of his 200th anniversary. Some stupid Jew gabbled learnedly to us that only a Jew like Mendelssohn could have written the oratorios 保卢斯 和 以利亚 because only Jews know the Old Testament.

Their ignorance is matched only by their arrogance -or should I simply call it chutzpah.

James Levine’s version of New World Symphony is the best by far. So, I give him that.

The greatest talent of the Jews is to recognize what will make money and what will not.

It’s not a talent; it’s lack of inhibition. 任何 for a shekel.

Life is short, listen to what brings you pleasure.
It’s only music. It took me over fifty years to learn that civilization is more important than culture.

…Gregorian chant…

很棒的东西。

Levine is a creep (he is worse than you think: https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2018/03/02/cleveland/cn2Sathz0EMJcdpYouoPjM/story.html ) but I would be lying if I did not say that I often find his Wagner to be riveting.

My all-time favorite performing artist is Sviatoslav Richter. I know practically nothing about his personal life and given what I know of his proclivities I’d like to keep it that way.

非常感谢。

I first heard these concerti live at Berkeley in around 1968; the ensemble was Harnoncourt’s at the very beginning of its career (at least in the USA). The harpsicordist was Herbert Tachezi and he was sensational, if a bit metronomical.

Richter is magnificent beyond words – both as a musician and as a man. So, too, is his ensemble.

What a contrast to the morally and physically hideous types who have usurped their places, in Germany also alas.

Thank you for confirming it for those of us who already suspected it; id est, that people who think Mahler was a great composer are people who don’t know anything about music.

(Stop frowning Vinteuil; I don’t mean you).

您讨厌哪个天主教堂：真正的或梵蒂冈二世之前的天主教堂，还是现在由反教皇方济各统治的伪造恐怖？

I would suppose it must have been the first, because the modern counterfeit is not worth anyone’s hate, but only derision and disdain.

伯恩斯坦对瓦格纳歌剧《特里斯坦与伊索尔德》中《利贝斯托德》的演绎是所有演绎中最美丽的。 1920 年代中期，恩斯特·汉夫斯坦格尔 (Ernst Hanfstaengl) 扮演希特勒《爱的人》(Hitler the Liebestod)，以让他放松。如果伯恩斯坦和希特勒知道就好了。

匿名写道：

Whats happened is the greatest civilization that has ever been by orders of magnitude- the european, a civilization thats risen numerous over millennia to be globally hegemonic has been usurped by jews continually over the past two centuries.The theft is bad enough the ingratitude awful, but what has been lost is what europeans would have otherwise done in that occupied space.Its not a matter of whether or not jews played fair which they didnt, thats beside the point, its simply untenable that a people as great as the european should be ruled by another and the world should be deprived of our fruits.

Sicut Judeis non
https://messianicjewishhistory.wordpress.com/2015/09/15/15-september-1199-papal-bull-sicut-judaeis-re-issued-by-innocent-iii-otdimjh/

. . .The most fundamental and well-known document in this matter is the Sicut Iudaeis bull (Constitutio pro Iudaeis). The bull was first promulgated in 1120 by Pope Calixtus II and later re-issued by several different popes.6 It reaffirms the theological principle of the doctrine of Jewish Witness as the basis for

extending protection to the Jews and for the prohibition against abusing them or their rights, despite their obstinacy and refusal to recognise the truth. They must not be forcibly converted, but anyone who has converted to Christianity may not renege and resume being a Jew. Naturally, all of the above is applicable only providing that they do not plot against Christians and Christianity.

我们开始理解的是，以被劫持的“文化”的形式强行进入我们家的堕落

我是我所在街区唯一的外邦人，我清楚地记得过度性化（（（他们）））如何让他们的孩子不到 10 岁。 这些孩子会谈论阴茎和阴道，就好像他们是 GI Joe 人物一样。 即使在我还是个孩子的时候，它也总是让我感到不安。

在一位父母的家里，餐桌上挂着一幅真人大小的裸体男人画——这个主题与作为纽约市教师和学校心理学家的父亲有着鲜明的相似之处。 他们的孩子总是邀请其他孩子在那幅画下的餐厅里玩耍——他们家的电视游戏机就在那个房间里，很方便。 即使在 7 岁的时候，我也知道这件事有些堕落，并且再也没有回到那所房子里。

性变态是犹太人的传统。 我的另一个“邻居”是一个温顺的圆顶小帽佩戴者，他有一个秘密爱好：盯着我们的窗户和他自己房客的窗户。 似乎这个善良的犹太人会偷偷溜进他房客的公寓，在他们睡觉的时候打开他们的东西并打开水龙头。 我们确信这个变态闯入了我们租户的公寓，并在 1980 年夏天和她一起爬上床。他会破坏我们的汽车，当我们在 1983 年冬天得到一只德国牧羊犬时，他会用弹弓打小狗。

德国牧羊犬制止了这个变态的爱好。 现在很明显，他在晚上看着我们的窗户，狗的吠声把他吓跑了。 我的母亲是一个非常美丽的女人，我们经常让她的两个侄女在他们的母亲去世后和我们住在一起。 这位善良的犹太人的嗜好不会让看门狗阻止他，所以他试图毒害他。

1983 年 XNUMX 月，我的母亲目睹了他在他的食物上洒了水。她在造成任何伤害之前将食物从狗身上取走，并与迅速跑进他家的好犹太人对峙。 我们报警了，但众所周知纽约警察，你必须给拉比打电话，否则他们不会出现。 一年的法庭听证会和一位善良的犹太调解人决定，外邦人将他们的狗关在里面，而善良的犹太人不会毒害他。

变态是犹太人不为人知的习俗。 当我的表兄弟和我们住在一起时，毒狗者对面的老犹太人一直想教他们打网球。 我母亲甚至不允许一个变态的犹太人对青春期前和青春期的女孩动手，她禁止告诉她的侄女这个男人是变态。

当我读到这篇关于伯恩斯坦的文章时，它非常符合我小时候与犹太人打交道的所有经历。 庸俗的自夸使人变态堕落。 想象一下，我们几代人一直在不知不觉中让这些狗屎进入我们的家。

我们文化的毒害如此彻底，以至于我们无法摆脱它。 想想这对我们生活的各个领域造成的所有伤害。 他们对我们的战争已经持续了很长时间，以至于我们现在发现自己被赶出了我们的家园，我们的机构，因为他们从他们为摧毁我们而建立的轴心的前沿教训我们。 一个由变态、共产主义者、犹太人和混合种族组成的轴心，都反对一切“白人”。

Bernstein must have hated to death the white Southern Tom Wolfe for so masterfully and mercilessly skewering him in Radical Chic and Mau-Mauing the Flak Catchers, a scathing satire that extends to the whole jewish ‘elite.’ Sadly for us and fortunately for TW’s legacy it is not dated at all; one can re-read it, perhaps even appreciate it more now than some (most?) of us were capable to absorb in 1970 when it was published.

PS Tom Wolfe died this past May but the MSM did not mourn his passing as they did that of , say, ethnic novelist Phillip Roth, who died the same month.

3o 年的沉默，1928-57？

不，西贝柳斯关闭了他的魔法书，因为他已经读到最后一页了。

并且对他这样做很好。

as compared to say, Dvorak who, post 9th Symphony/Cello Cencerto, keep right on for another 20 or so opus numbers…and all uninspired note-spinning.

与西贝柳斯和肖斯塔科维奇（也许还有普罗科菲耶夫）一起......

What is this new abomination of omitting the space before a parenthesis? I see it constantly in 乌兹网 comments and even in articles. It reminds me of the British hipster-ism of spelling “12 miles” or “twelve miles” in text as “12mi.”

来吧，人们！ 英语是一种威严的语言，而不是一个沙盒，因为你可以。 如果您必须使用它，请保存您的 pidgin English 以用于发短信。

I adore Karl Richter also, though that hardly demonstrates his conducting skill (as compared to, say, his sublime Christmas Oratorio). And as a performer, he leaves a greater legacy as an organist.

To Mulegin01: I’m fine with the statement that “The first movement of the 5th is the greatest moment of the Brandenburg concertos.” But it is hardly “peak Bach”, as some of the organ works are.

I cheer Zubin Mehta for his recordings of John Knowles Paine, whom I regard as AMERICA’S GREATEST COMPOSER.

True- but Luther’s revolution was an exception, and JS Bach was a devout Lutheran,

什么，没有乌木？

你是雷西斯。

您能向我们当中的非马里安人解释一下其中的区别吗？

打字错误时有发生。为什么要为这样的小事大惊小怪呢？那里没有威严。

One more effort in expanding people’s “Bach window”:

anon [393]•免责声明：
6 年 2019 月 1 日下午 59:XNUMX（格林威治标准时间） •

所发生的情况是，一个以信任和开放为中心战略的民族，却被一个以凝聚力和寄生为中心战略的民族所针对。

这句话说得非常简洁和到位。但我们如何才能在为时已晚之前唤醒人们呢？

What about Smetana?

Jaap van Zweden’ Dallas period was absolutely fabulous. As for the New York’s period — the time will show.

通过向他们通报情况并进行政治组织。

Sinopoli was really great.

Haven’t time for it all? Then cut to the slow movement. 19:11

省略括号前的空格这个新的令人厌恶的行为是什么？

谢谢，也经常在这里指出。

Perhaps there are only so many strokes allotted to a lifetime, and so….

A man I know who has been a classical music radio programmer for some decades has enjoyed these comments but wishes that the evaluations of the works and conductors were explained in some terms beyond just approval or disapproval. Surely the ability is here to do so.

Correct- “Peak Bach” would be the B Minor Mass and St. Matthew’s Passion, particularly the “Sanctus” in the former and “O Mensch Bewein Dein Sunder Gross” in the latter.

Oops. I duplicated. This was the intended second selection:

Have you given Bellini’s ‘Bel Canto’ style any hearings?:

Oh I know his Schumann #2! Agreed and thanks.

“Marianites?” If by that you mean that Catholics worship Our Lady, then you know even less about Catholicism than you think you do.

可以看出，梵蒂冈二世之前的教会在敬拜、教义和精神方面，与使徒时代的教会完全相同。

The Church then miserably “modernised” itself during the Second Vatican Council, which took place under Pope John XXIII from 1962 to 1965. This process was undertaken with some care, and the full implications of the changes in liturgy (abandonment of Latin first, then a complete remaking of the Mass in 1969, followed by changes in all of the sacraments), in doctrine (surrender to the Jews, to the democratic spirit, which was nevertheless coupled to an extreme enhancement of the powers of bishops over their own clergy, and the pope over the bishops), and to modernity in general.

The ethos of the Church in the past was always to teach the world and to aggressively preach the Faith to all peoples and nations. This was turned on its head with the ecumenical movement, with its emphasis upon “dialogue” rather than the cool but insistent presentation of Truth.

This self-immolation has now reached its apogee with the pontificate of the open heretic Francis, who is an utterly miserable creature, loathed (as they have learned to know him) every bit as much by his allies as by his opponents (otherwise knows as “Catholics”).

幸运的是，2019 年已经成为他可能终结的一年。 他深陷其中的文书滥用丑闻即将通过州和联邦司法部门的类似法律行动的 RICO 地震扫除美国富有而傲慢的主教的虚假面貌，而他，弗朗西斯，是不会跟着海啸逃走的。

历史悠久的天主教堂是一股不可忽视的力量。 它是连贯的，它是一种高尚文化的力量，它也是一个能够产生圣人的身体，并且经常这样做。

它被爱过，也被恨过。 今天没有什么可爱的，没有什么可恨的。 人们只需要坐下来，嘲笑它是什么，（如果有人喜欢它）为它的消失而悲伤，然后看着它继续自我毁灭。

只是提到。 你说的话似乎与我不得不说的有关..没有恶意

（更正：约瑟夫·海顿）

你的评论听起来很有趣。 现在，为了我们好奇但粗鲁的土块有很多事情要做，如果可能的话，你介意提供一两个链接吗？

在此先感谢。

打字错误时有发生。为什么要为这样的小事大惊小怪呢？那里没有威严。

高手回应！

What is this recurrent abomination of acting as proof reader? I see it constantly in 乌兹网 comments, and as off topic and smug as it sounds, I ask whether it’s anything more than attention seeking behavior.

Thanks for telling the truth about the Balfour letter.

” Jews of communist persuasion felt an inner pressure to care about the People, the masses, the workers, and etc. The Brotherhood of Man thing.”

The subjective motivations of individuals are outside of the reach of objective determination.
Generalized though it can be roughly perceived that some people are sympathetic to communism for humane reasons, they are often high achievers (not among so called oppressed classes), and i’d say often extremely naive as of the reality of communism.
On the other hand there are the low achievers and or the envious who like to cut off the head of everything which is above them by forming an utopia of equality where everyone has roughly the same, is the same, and thinks the same. Then there are the clever demagogues and power mongers who play on the envy of the low achieving masses, stirring the latent hatred of the latter in order to set them up against the high achievers.
Bernstein obviously was a high achiever and, as a personality, not very much into the kind of deadly equality and subjugation of the individual which is the communist utopia.., so that it is probably naivety combined with humane intentions which lead him to see communism as a solution for various problems.

但我们如何才能在为时已晚之前唤醒人们呢？

这是一个很好但又永恒的问题。

PS: It’s been too late for some time now.

Kulak didn’t imply successful. It just meant a small farmer, maybe a tenant, maybe owned the land before the revolution. The Kulak distinction the Bolsheviks created was owner ship of animals. There was also the implication that somehow the Kulaks cheated other small farmers somehow.

The Bolsheviks destroyed Russian agriculture with their badly run collective farms. A Kulak was also any farmer who didn’t want to give his machinery tools livestock seed and labor to the Bolshevik collective shave lsbor farms

That was the reason for the Bolshevik attacks deportations to the gulag and massacres. The farmers resisted being driven to the collective farms and being forced into slave lsbor by Jewish sissy city boys who didn’t know what they were doing

法国著名作家安德烈·纪德在 1914 年的日记中写道：“在我看来，这种不断强调犹太人、偏爱他和对他特别感兴趣的倾向，这种倾向于承认他的才能，甚至是天才的倾向，源于事实上，犹太人对犹太人的品质特别敏感”（André Gide, Œuvres complètes, Gallimard, 1933, tome VIII, p. 571）。

Philip Roth, the creepy pervy wanker who wrote about his repulsive self? That Philip Roth?

Loved Tom Wolfe, loathed Roth.
Our autobiographer Jeff Stryker reminds me of Philip Roth with his endless whining about his fall from AnnArbor to the slums of Detroit but remaining superior to the White trash thugs in the White trash slums of Detroit.

And then, redemption, his escape from White trash America to the New Jerusalem of Asia.

“…the Balfour Declaration didn’t ‘mandate’ anything. It referred to a territory that wasn’t even held by Britain yet, and merely observed that His Majesty’s government ‘looked with favor’ on the establishment of such a National Home.”
— Thank you for the reminder.

那时我不知道我现在对包括基督教在内的宗教做了什么。 我讨厌我认识的天主教堂，我在那里长大。
就像我周围的社会一样，它充满了种族主义和阶级意识。 如果你是棕色混合白皮肤……如果你是中国人、印度人和真正的白人，你在教堂内外都会被视为。
我说的不是北美……我不是在那里长大的。
所有的牧师都是白人和意大利人。 在第一次圣餐前一天，当我们去忏悔时，忏悔的牧师是一个非常年轻的高个爱尔兰人......但我想现在二十多岁
他没有接受我们的忏悔，而是让我们玩转接球，被抓住的人会被带到长老室给他打屁股。 我被抓住并拖到那里，但当他把我弯下腰时吓坏了。 我爬起来跑回家。
现在我知道这可能意味着什么了。 但还有很多。

那是在一个星期六的下午。 星期天我做了第一次圣餐，本来应该在星期二早上第二次圣餐。 那时我没有去参加圣餐，因为在此期间我犯了罪，不得不认罪但没有机会这样做。 但我看到了我的朋友，和我一起长大的其他男孩，他们也犯了罪，就像什么也没发生一样。 他们犯了罪，但对他们来说无关紧要。

我们当时 6 岁和 7 岁，看看我们现在的样子。 我惊呆了。 他们知道，他们不在乎。 这就是我对天主教会以及随后所有宗教的发现……它们所代表的深刻虚伪……实际上存在于

随后发生在我生命中的事情让我在我生命的早期变得无舵和没有权威。 我可以为所欲为，我只是在 12 点前停止去教堂......因为没有人可以让我去。 教会不喜欢被发现，有没有控制m..bot来救我。

你读过玛拉基马丁的书吗？ 如果有，你对他们有什么看法？

“……勋伯格永远无法与瓦格纳或莫扎特相提并论。”

——塔鲁斯金将十二声部音乐称为时空的崩塌，这并非毫无道理。 勋伯格采用了高贵的复调技巧，并将其带入了丑陋的死胡同。

根据 Forkel 的说法，伟大的巴赫会首先与他的学生讨论音乐的美，然后再进行解释美的声音引导技术。 十二声部音乐跳过了介绍，并以牺牲精神深度和真正掌握的代价来解决音色/音域变化。

“Lenni”是一位才华横溢的音乐家，但他在任何地方都不出色。 他的伟大之处在于自我推销。 他肮脏的自我放纵行为鼓励了其他变态（对孩子的法式亲吻 - 真的？）他的流口水和无耻，加上裙带关系，强化了一个有影响力的犹太人的刻板印象。 不是一个特别好的庆祝案例。

谢谢你。 巴赫，德国文明的荣耀！
卡尔·里希特 (Karl Richter) 录制的所有勃兰登堡协奏曲令人振奋。 他是一位强大而诚实的音乐家。

同意。 科普兰是一位才华横溢、技艺精湛的编译器。

那么括号和单词之间应该有一个空格吗？

引号的正确形式是什么？ 。” 或者 ”。

嗯，你肯定有你的理由。

MM，
犹太人的代理人；
天主教徒/基督徒的叛徒。
他的作品适合垃圾班轮；
他的坟墓好吐。

5ds

西贝柳斯在 1928-1957 年间的沉默不是创造力的危机，而是信心的危机。

主要有以下三个因素：

(1) 他的作品在英国和美国受到热烈欢迎，被最伟大的英美指挥家——比查姆、斯托科夫斯基、巴比罗利、库塞维茨基等所接受。至少在一项对美国音乐会观众的调查中，他甚至超过了贝多芬在人气中。 他的追随者们狂热地猜测他是否以及如何超越第七交响曲的崇高完美。 所以他在第 7 天工作时压力很大。

(2) 与此同时，在他从未真正突破过的欧洲大陆，维也纳第二学派和他们的游击队员，如（无限邪恶的）西奥多·阿多诺（愿他在地狱里永远腐烂和燃烧）正在崛起“Intelligentsia”——他们将西贝柳斯列为“世界上最糟糕的作曲家”——他们将西贝柳斯列为“世界上最糟糕的作曲家”——这场运动可耻地得到了美国最有影响力的音乐评论家、令人厌恶的变态维吉尔·汤姆森和美国最有才华的音乐家之一的协助。作曲家，典型的 commie-pinko-fag Aaron Copland。

(3) …所有这些都导致了 Sibelius 长期存在的酒精问题。

剩下的就是沉默。

我一直认为西区故事中的帮派是第三代意大利人与第一代 PR。 我最喜欢的歌曲是这位西班牙裔歌手演唱的美国歌曲。 我也喜欢克鲁普克警官。

总的来说，我不喜欢它。 这是一个带有俏皮 Bobby Darin 式情歌的俏皮爱情故事 即使在我十几岁的时候，我也认为这是对危险暴徒的自由粉饰。 我喜欢芭蕾，但是打芭蕾的暴徒？？？ 我当时认为这是一个非常女性化的节目，与许多文化中标准的罗密欧与朱丽叶故事完全相反。 大多数故事都是极端男子气概的，整个男子气概的事情是捍卫一个人的文化领土和女性反对另一个。

帮派中的男孩子看起来如此少女和无害。 想想看，杰罗姆罗宾斯电影中的所有男人都是娘娘腔和少女。 对比杰罗姆·罗宾斯和弗雷德·阿斯泰尔的男舞者。 他很瘦很矮，而且打扮得非常好。 但他是一个真正的成年男子，而不是一个娘娘腔的男孩子。

很多男性芭蕾舞演员都是同性恋。 但是，当他们扮演一个在芭蕾舞中很多的强大而可怕的人时，他们设法变得非常阳刚和强大。

我的兄弟和儿子在 5 岁时就比《西区故事》中那些娘娘腔的柔弱男舞者更有男子气概。 剧本的真正问题在于托尼的死没有真正的仇恨。 假定的危险流氓行为就像高中体育课被老师分成小组一样。

然后砰的一声，托尼被杀了。

我唯一记得伯恩斯坦在媒体上的美化是宣传声称费利西亚是某种南美贵族大小姐，而不是普通的美国人。

这些评论是我喜欢 Unz 的地方。 无论是什么学科，知识的广度和深度都是惊人的。 不仅仅是音乐知识，还有指挥家！！ 我对你的知识印象深刻。 你们真棒！

听起来很合理。 很多细节我真的不记得了。

路德的问题是他对圣经的重视，阅读思维的中介和痴迷导致了加尔文、诺克斯和其他疯子。 阅读圣经，每个村里的白痴都能弄清楚每个神话和寓言的含义，并创建自己的教派。

唷！

但是你的叙述告诉我，你在 NewChurch 实际上会很自在：它和你一样反白和反欧洲（包括所有这些暗示）。

你听起来像我认识的 75% 的一神论者（ 2空格 其他 25% 是前犹太人 2空格 ).

嗤之以鼻——
首先，我感受到你的痛苦，不仅仅是黑人或棕色人种，或者穷人，经历过你所做的事情。

但其次，许多最伟大的追随者耶稣坚如磐石的信息； 天主教机构通过公平手段或犯规创造和支持的美丽，例如专注于玛丽和女性提升的中世纪音乐，艺术，建筑和宫廷神话，也深深鄙视罗马天主教机构教会，即使他们将自己的巨大才能用于庆祝耶稣的潜在精神信息， 基督教灵性 有人说，它被委托给罗马天主教保存。

这一类包括但丁、马基雅维利和威尔第：他们都憎恶罗马天主教，但保留甚至创造了最高形式的天主教 基督教灵性.

在我看来，基督教的灵魂在于审美。 也许这就是为什么伦纳德·伯恩斯坦 (Leonard Bernstein) 是天主教/基督教世界观中一股破坏性力量的象征。

最后一件事——似乎无法从我的爱好马匹上下来：看看二战中被盟军摧毁的东西：天主教和基督教建筑美学表达的主要和古老中心——卡西诺山的本笃会修道院被夷为平地; 罗马成为统治罗斯福霸权野心的游乐场和中心； 在德国战后时代，以犹太人为主导的占领军消灭了表达德国精神的艺术和音乐，取而代之的是“现代主义”——即犹太人的偏好。

你可能会比其中两个更晚读一点历史，慈运理、加尔文、诺克斯、路德，另一个更晚。 如果知道一无所知的白痴会克制就好了。

然而，我们这些具有基本观察力的人，很容易就能看到惯用的谎言。

(((Copland)))，看看他那张呆板的脸，愚蠢，甚至亚白痴。

我对听的记忆很模糊，有时我被犹太合唱团'dis is dah great composer'所愚弄，听了，一切都沉闷且容易忘记。

斯坦利考夫曼称其为有史以来最好的音乐剧。 宝琳凯尔讨厌它。 她认为音乐剧应该是有趣和滑稽的，而不是被社会意义所压倒。

这部电影总体上没有过时，但有一些杀手歌曲：民谣“玛丽亚”、舞曲“我喜欢在美国”、摇滚乐“喷气之歌”和“今晚”。 而“克鲁普克警官”则是一部不错的流行讽刺剧。

https://wondersinthedark.wordpress.com/2014/09/03/24-west-side-story/

我知道卡尔文·诺克斯 (Calvin Knox) 和其他痴迷于种族灭绝暴力性行为和犹太圣经背信弃义的疯子。

(((Copland)))，看看他那张呆板的脸，愚蠢，甚至亚白痴。

他们说莫扎特也丑得要命。 事实上，科普兰确实创作了《阿巴拉契亚之春》，这是美国最真实、最伟大的杰作之一。

这对你来说很便宜。 以蒙特赌场为例，当然是一个，但不具有代表性，美军地面部队的破坏是没有必要的。

此外，他们也算不上英雄（有些是，但他们的对手，更是如此），他们是一群庸俗的傻瓜。

在亚洲也是如此。

当我 90 年代初住在纽约市时，我实际上对这个人相当了解。

他是个好伙伴，但人们永远不知道他讲述的内容有多少是真实的。 人们总是怀疑他的爱尔兰人的闲言碎语正在让他变得更好。

他的书也是如此，除了 最后的秘密会议，这是第一本具有重要意义的书，它向广大公众揭示了梵蒂冈二世教会发生的事情的真相。

不幸的是，科普兰是美国第二个最接近伟大作曲家的人。 除了阿巴拉契亚之春，还有比利小子、牛仔竞技表演、红小马电影配乐以及其他一些零碎的片段。

塞缪尔·巴伯 (Samuel Barber) 离伟大更近了一步。

也许令人困惑的是，英国人授予自己一个 要求 在第一次世界大战中从奥斯曼帝国手中夺取了该地区，尤其是通过阿拉伯的劳伦斯的背叛。

在这项任务的掩护下，英国向包括犹太复国主义者在内的几个不同的政党承诺了它并没有真正拥有的东西。

第一次世界大战结束前不久，拉比斯蒂芬·怀斯、路易斯·布兰代斯、菲利克斯·法兰克福特和其他犹太领袖组成了美国犹太人大会——>

“美国犹太人大会* [AJC] 成立于 1918 年，是由犹太人、犹太复国主义者和移民社区组织组成的美国犹太人社区的领导人，在费城历史悠久的独立厅召开了第一届美国犹太人大会 (AJCongress)。 拉比斯蒂芬·S·怀斯、费利克斯·法兰克福特、美国最高法院大法官路易斯·布兰代斯和其他人一起为一个由来自全国各地的犹太领导人组成的全国民主组织奠定了基础，该组织将扩大犹太人的领导能力和 1919 年在巴黎和会上提出统一的美国犹太人立场。” https://ajcongress.org/about

尽管“犹太人”在战争中没有国家，也没有实际的政党，但拥有十几名成员的 AJC 代表团对凡尔赛的诉讼程序产生了巨大的影响。 （除了 AJC 代表“犹太利益”之外，伯纳德·巴鲁克 (Bernard Baruch) ** 在伍德罗·威尔逊的巴黎代表团中，他无所不在​​。 还应该指出的是，英国队在凡尔赛宫的劳埃德·乔治一直是柴姆·魏茨曼及其所代表的犹太复国主义者的法律顾问。 )

In 转让协议，埃德温·布莱克写道：

“一个跨越委员会和国会界限的代表团终于在凡尔赛聚集。 但是，在委员会认为，提议的权利“太过分”时，委员会与其他美国犹太团体在谈判犹太人权利时分道扬镳。 具体而言，当凡尔赛的地图绘制者根据宗教、语言和其他种族相似性重新划分边界时，流行的犹太人情绪要求将其他少数群体纳入自决目标。 这意味着巴勒斯坦犹太人的犹太家园 - 犹太复国主义。

委员会领导人 [即德国犹太人 – ed.] 被犹太复国主义排斥。 在他们看来，在巴勒斯坦的避难所会促使犹太人被驱逐出犹太人居住和享有根基的国家。 反犹太主义政权可以指向巴勒斯坦并声称，“你属于 那里 在你自己的国家。” 然而，大多数犹太人的情绪在凡尔赛获胜，确保了巴勒斯坦的犹太人家园，并规定在其​​他国家保留犹太人的权利。

美国犹太国会领导人从凡尔赛宫凯旋归来。 他们帮助建立了一个犹太家园，并为欧洲的少数民族提供了安全的国际保障。 =

[如果不能解开上述段落和路易斯布兰代斯随后对德国犹太人的指示的影响，那么二战的历史就不会接近完整。 – ed]

* AJC 是一个新组织，补充了先前存在的美国犹太委员会，该委员会主要由富裕的德国犹太人组成，他们不太愿意接受犹太复国主义。 正如上面所提到的，广泛引用，认识到犹太复国主义在国际犹太人中是一个非常新的概念是至关重要的； 这是非常有争议的，甚至相当于各种犹太团体和派别之间的内战。 Brandeis-Frankfurter-Wise 派系得到了美国政府最高当局的关注，并取得了成功。 以及随后的世纪。

** 有趣的事实：

“ 1916年， 巴鲁克 离开华尔街，就国防和和平条款向伍德罗·威尔逊总统提出建议。 他曾在国防委员会的咨询委员会任职，并且， 1918年，成为新的军工委员会主席。 在他的领导下，这个机构在第一次世界大战期间成功地管理了美国的经济动员。 In 1919, Wilson asked Baruch to serve as a staff member at the Paris Peace Conference. Baruch did not approve of the reparations France and Britain demanded of Germany, and supported Wilson’s view that there needed to be new forms of cooperation, as well as the creation of the League of Nations. ”

和

“在 1920 和 30 年代，巴鲁克表达了他的担忧，即美国需要为另一场世界大战的可能性做好准备。 他想要一个更强大的战争工业委员会， 他认为这是确保民用业务和军事需求之间最大程度协调的唯一途径。 这次Baruch仍然是一个着名的政府顾问，并在他选举后支持富兰克林D.罗斯福的国内外政策举措。 ”

和

“当美国进入第二次世界大战时，罗斯福总统任命巴鲁克为战争动员办公室主任的特别顾问。 他支持所谓的“工作或斗争”法案。 巴鲁克主张建立一个类似于他以前的工业委员会的永久性超级机构。 他的理论增强了平民商人和工业家在确定需要什么以及由谁来生产方面的作用。 巴鲁克的想法在很大程度上被采纳了。 . 。” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernard_Baruch

同时，

“[Walther Rathenau] 在战争部原材料司担任高级职务，并在其父亲于 1915 年去世后成为 AEG 主席。拉特瑙在说服战争部成立战争原材料司 (KRA) 方面发挥了关键作用，他在其中发挥了关键作用。 1914 年 1915 月至 XNUMX 年 XNUMX 月期间负责，并制定了基本政策和程序。 他的高级职员是从工业界借来的。 KRA 专注于受到英国封锁威胁的原材料，以及来自被占领的比利时和法国的供应。 它设定价格并规范重要军工行业的分配。 它开始了发展 埃萨茨凯瑟特姆 原材料，开发供应链以在德国实现和平和政权更迭。 [7] 由于商业、工业和政府本身遇到的复杂性和自私性，KRA 遭受了许多低效率。 [8][需要澄清] 原文如此 = https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walther_Rathenau

惊人的巧合：巴鲁克在第一次世界大战和第二次世界大战中负责美国战争经济事务； 瓦尔特·拉特瑙 (Walther Rathenau) 在第一次世界大战中负责重要的德国战争经济事务。

接下来，循环回到埃德温布莱克的 转让协议 当他讨论德国人民内心和心理中的恐惧以及 犹太人对德国的经济战争宣言， 特别注意到布莱克对一战中 800,000 万德国人丧生的饥饿原因的无知评估
[轻推：布莱克含蓄地认为拉特瑙应对德国经济处理不当并造成饥饿负责]:

“曾经强大的德国经济的恶化真正始于第一次世界大战，当时德国军事和政治领导人根本没有计算长期战争的经济影响 [柴姆·魏茨曼在英国的活动是延长战争的主要因素。 看 贝尔福宣言， 伦纳德·斯坦（Leonard Stein）（魏茨曼的助手和同伴）– ed] 盟军的封锁切断了德国的港口和大部分陆地贸易路线。 贸易遭到破坏。 工业不能出口。 战争物资和民用必需品，包括食品，不能进口。
[玛德琳奥尔布赖特会同意的。 这种战术非常成功，以至于它被用来对付伊朗。 见尼玛设拉子， 伤害、上吊、窒息和饥饿：伊朗威胁言论的不人道 -编辑]
在封锁解除之前，800,000 名营养不良的德国平民丧生。 实际上，与战前 80% 的粮食自给自足的德国的粮食短缺相比，封锁造成的粮食短缺要少于将德国人赶出农场参加战斗而不补偿粮食减产的短视政策。 But the popular perception among Germans was that they had been starved into submission, defeated not on the battlefield but by political and economic warfare and connivance, by what became known as the “stab in the back.” ”

那些可怕的匈奴人哪里来的这种荒谬的想法？

拉特瑙在魏玛时期一直在德国事务中扮演重要角色，直到 1922 年他被暗杀。也许是因为拉特瑙认为自己“先是德国人，然后是犹太​​人”，偶尔会试图与自己的犹太人保持距离，所以他没有受到 国际犹太人 也没有犹太作家军团——他的名字没有出现在布莱克的书的索引中，传记也很少。 拉特瑙的暗杀没有上升到 宣战 1922 年，虽然，正如吉拉德·阿兹蒙 (Gilad Atzmon) 在 从埃丝特到 AIPAC，

“In 1969, Rabbi Prinz confessed that ever “since the assassination of Walther Rathenau in 1922, there was no doubt in our minds that the German development would be toward an anti-Semitic totalitarian regime. When Hitler began to arouse, and as he put it ‘awaken’ the German nation to racial consciousness and racial superiority, we had no doubt that this man would sooner or later become the leader of the German nation.”[13] ”

当希特勒确实成为德国的领导人时，拉比斯蒂芬·怀斯 (Stephen Wise) 使拉特瑙 (Rathenau) 的悲痛复活，并谴责希特勒在杀死拉特瑙 (Rathenau) 中丧生的刺客的坟墓上献花。

哎哟。

我被称为Che Guava 比Cheap 更糟糕的事情，但你将不得不提出比“不具有代表性”更多的支持。

盟军轰炸了整个意大利半岛，在意大利（如法国）造成的死亡和破坏比德国人多得多。 里克·阿特金森 (Rick Atkinson) 表示，意大利的竞选活动在很多方面都是不必要的和考虑不周的。 在意大利死亡的美国人比在其他欧洲剧院中死亡的人数还要多。

德国是故意破坏其遗留建筑的目标，德累斯顿是这项政策中最常被人记住的目标，尽管盟军燃烧弹使德国 131 个城市的尾端无法居住，其大部分祖先和神圣的建筑无法恢复。

但我特别想的是 Cora Sol Goldstein 的信息中包含的信息 夺取德国人的眼睛：在被占领的德国的美国视觉宣传
https://www.press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/C/bo6161622.html
戈德斯坦详细描述了美国占领军如何在战后大约五年内对德国人民进行心理战，其目的是重塑他们的内部景观——他们的心灵要清除“纳粹主义”甚至德国文化意识，除了“现代主义”，尤其是在艺术领域，以及对美国主义和消费文化的钦佩之外，在他们的位置上播下了强迫性内疚的杂草种子。 她的话，不是我的话。

在我看来，这符合莱姆金对文化种族灭绝的定义。

而且，最糟糕的是，它奏效了。

伯恩斯坦是一个天才，一个伟大的美国人，但他没有任何节制或分寸感，他不断地摧毁自己。 纽约时报星期日杂志上有一个长篇简介，他在那里完成了一项指挥工作，筋疲力尽。 他回到后台，立即开始吸氧气罐。 大约十分钟后，他恢复了精神，点燃了一支烟。

没有人想效仿我想的人。

至少他没有像理查德普赖尔那样自焚。

感谢您提供如此优秀的教育材料。

该部落的贪婪和卑鄙的不道德已经在宣布的要求中东国家（包括饱受战争蹂躏的利比亚、叙利亚和伊拉克）赔偿的计划中体现出来： https://www.rt.com/news/448252-israel-compensation-jews-arab-states/

负责协调这项工作的以色列社会平等部部长吉拉·加姆利尔 (Gila Gamliel) 表示，现在是时候“纠正七个阿拉伯国家和伊朗对犹太人的大屠杀的历史性不公正，并恢复数十万失去了财产的犹太人，这是他们理所当然的。” …

以色列将向突尼斯寻求35亿美元，向利比亚寻求15亿美元。 还将向摩洛哥、伊拉克、叙利亚、埃及、也门和伊朗寻求赔偿。

他的流口水和无耻，再加上裙带关系，强化了对有影响力的犹太人的刻板印象。 不是一个特别好的庆祝案例。

我读过的对“著名犹太人”的清晰描述。 荣誉！

我养海棠已经超过 12 年了。 最近，它在一个非常凉爽的地方已经一个多月没有浇水了。 茎叶无力地垂在盆壁上，似乎已经走到了不归路的地步。

但是 4 到 5 天的温和浇水和一点热量几乎使植物完全焕然一新； 一片叶子死了，仅此而已。 有理由预计它会在初夏开花。

祝愿并希望德国人民能够浇水取暖，恢复健康旺盛的成长。

De' corsi affanni compenso avrai,
la tua 敬礼 rifiorirà。

“德国是故意破坏其遗留建筑的目标，德累斯顿是这项政策中最常被人记住的目标，尽管盟军燃烧弹使德国 131 个城市的尾端无法居住，其大部分祖先和神圣的建筑无法恢复。”
——这类似于布尔什维克革命后对俄罗斯进行的文化种族灭绝。 https://fee.org/articles/the-staggering-toll-of-the-russian-revolution/

20 年 1918 月 1921 日列宁颁布法令，开始将教堂财产国有化：大教堂、教堂、教堂场地和教堂拥有的所有建筑物被洗劫一空，贵重物品（金、银、白金、绘画、圣像、历史文物）被洗劫一空。被共产主义无神论者偷走，或通过政府特工、共产主义同情者以及美国商业大亨阿曼德·哈默 (Armand Hammer) 等同路人出售给西方，他于 XNUMX 年与列宁会面。

你伤透了我的心，安娜玛丽亚。

很难想象任何人或团体怎么会如此邪恶。

感谢您为 UF 评论部分做出的所有贡献。

五十年代初，巴勒斯坦人被驱逐，以色列缺乏农民来耕种。
交易是与阿拉伯国家达成的：我们是犹太人，你们是他们的财产。
吉拉迪是讲述这个故事的人之一。
摩萨德在这些阿拉伯土地的犹太区放置了炸弹。

当然，在 97 年停火线内，以色列 1967% 的土地仍然是巴勒斯坦人的所有权，而在 100 年停火线之外，则是 XNUMX%，更不用说被摧毁的巴勒斯坦村庄和小镇。

为了防止向巴勒斯坦人支付赔偿金，决定对犹太人在阿拉伯国家失去的财产进行宣传。
塞法迪拉比大卫·沙沙（David Shasha）受雇于这次宣传。
当他发现人们对他的期望后，他退出了，并在互联网上开始了《西班牙系时事通讯》。
时事通讯是因为他找不到工作，被排斥。
一个诚实而聪明的人，莎莎，我读了一段时间的时事通讯，很高兴以色列宣传员如派普斯和刘易斯被揭穿。
据我所知，它不再存在，与其他美国非 asjkenazi 出版物合并。
对于那些不知道的人来说，新保守派等都是 asjkenazi 犹太人，来自欧洲东部，可能是非闪族，是大约公元 900 年从异教转向犹太教的可萨人的后裔。

以色列现在的所作所为让我感到困惑，以色列在世界上的地位从未像现在这样糟糕。
但以色列也在试图从波兰榨取资金，甚至阿姆斯特丹公共交通也宣布为大屠杀受害者或幸存者付款。
目前，我对犹太人问题的看法再次得到证实，对社会可接受的行为一无所知。

那些可怕的匈奴人哪里来的这种荒谬的想法？

这个长评论背后的可怕想法是什么，部分是真的，部分是谎言，部分是忽略重要事实？

什么部分是真的，什么部分是谎言，哪些重要的事实被忽略了，吉尔斯？

在正确 Mirandized 之前，我不会提供任何回应。

— 好吧，这个：“可怕的想法”是德国人“被人从背后捅了一刀”。

在我看来，德国确实被以前寻求过他们帮助的人出卖了，或者至少是被德国人​​向其提供安全保障甚至援助以在巴勒斯坦建立殖民地的同一组织的表面上的成员出卖了。

为了不那么抽象：首先承认犹太派别之间存在某种内战。 德国犹太人代表一个派别，是反犹太复国主义者。 愚人船 讲述了一个有趣的故事：德国犹太人在德国并没有不快乐； 直到（在我看来）犹太复国主义特工开始加热以吓唬他们离开之前，他们才感到受到威胁。

东欧犹太人是热情的犹太复国主义者，由柴姆魏茨曼（来自白俄罗斯）、拉比斯蒂芬怀斯（匈牙利犹太人，热情的犹太复国主义者，比特朗普的希瑟夫更能撒谎）为代表——而拉比正在努力恐吓德国犹太人放弃德国而去巴勒斯坦，他的女儿正在参观斯大林的俄罗斯，并与布尔什维克交往——这是在怀斯的书信中）； Louis Brandeis——一只好奇的猫——极端犹太复国主义者，但不那么热情，更像是一个吃豆人，无法阻止自己吞噬一个极好的商业机会； 费利克斯·法兰克福特。 一只更加好奇的猫：（不幸地）嫁给了一个长老会抑郁症患者，得到布兰迪斯的朋友和支持，因此渴望取悦LDB，在布兰迪斯的指导下成为一名大人物交易者，从而获得了他的相关性和目标感。

非德裔犹太人对背叛德裔犹太人对他们自己“祖国”的忠诚并没有感到内疚，德国领导人也并非没有意识到这些紧张局势：赫茨尔曾试图扮演奥斯曼帝国对抗德国人以支持犹太复国主义定居点，而柴姆·魏茨曼（Chaim Weizmann）工作在同一场比赛中，德国与英国的对决为犹太复国主义项目提供了最好的交易。 魏茨曼押注英国人并赢了。

也许 AfD 会提供您（和我）希望的温和浇水。

但是您肯定应该找到一些瓦格纳来为您的论文提供音乐伴奏吗？

这也许：

请举例说明“疯子”的疯狂。 加尔文和诺克斯是种族灭绝，还是你表达了对圣经和任何基于圣经的信仰体系的仇恨？

别担心，我对迷恋音乐的人没有很高的评价。 对我来说，他们中的许多人——不是大多数——似乎永远是青少年。 在这里，我要反对孔子、柏拉图和波普尔的音乐美学以及黑格尔和海德格尔。

无法解决的困境。

“但以色列也在试图从波兰榨取资金，甚至阿姆斯特丹的公共交通也宣布为大屠杀受害者或幸存者付款。
就目前而言，我对犹太人问题的看法再次得到证实，对社会可接受的行为一无所知。”

— 简而言之，犹太人作为一个部落遭受反社会人士的异常密集。 再加上对非犹太人的灌输不道德，这会扭曲一个人的性格。 也许这就是为什么这么多犹太人避免与其他犹太人一起生活的原因。 除了要求种族凝聚力的 Haredim 的宗教狂热（参见布鲁克林的某些地区）之外，犹太人很高兴过着非犹太人的生活并远离犹太国家。 此外，以色列和俄罗斯的犹太人更喜欢移民到德国而不是生活在犹太国家。

苏联犹太人涌入以色列是逃离苏联的愿望的结果。 在有选择的时候，移民们会强烈倾向于美国和加拿大。 他们过去和现在都是经济移民。
https://www.haaretz.com/1.5471218

在“最终解决方案”开始 XNUMX 年后，犹太人对生活在德国的感觉显然比在犹太国家要好。

https://www.haaretz.com/1.5177308
https://forward.com/news/4029/germany-is-moving-to-end-mass-immigration-of-jews/

德国当局向德国的两个国家犹太组织提出了对犹太人移民的新限制……正如所提出的那样，这些限制将有效地结束将近 200,000 名犹太人及其亲属从前苏联带到德国的移民浪潮……

你看错了！ 我没有教堂。

你的新教会读起来就像除了它自己之外还有一个巨大的官僚机构，有机会在整个地方制造bobol和腐败......为了得到白人的仇恨和反欧洲

对我来说，伙计，这是一个真正诚实善良的民主，它基于在其中工作的人对手段的普遍所有权，他们将决定他们和整个社会的各种民族主义

这样我就可以自由自在了。 当我必须工作时保存……自由人！

谋生，爱一个好女人..定义为我喜欢和想要的女人..一些孩子，最好是我自己准备的好食物..甚至让自己成长

我有一辈子的欧洲人，现在我必须用我的思想来恨你们……这还不错，不费时间，因为我可以把它保密并避开你们。

但也加入一个教会，把我的时间花在那里，积极地讨厌你们？

白人值这么多钱吗？
不！ 我不这么认为。 我什至不想和你们费心，花时间和你在一起，比如你……在你身边，在你身边

守住教会。 来吧，让我们进行一场革命和民主，然后我们就可以分道扬镳了。 非常真实

我希望这能解决它。 汉密尔顿注意到在 Unz 处（而不是其他地方）经常遗漏左括号和前一个单词之间的空格（像这样）。 你看到了吗？

就这样。 但是文本编辑器往往是一群挑剔的人。

没有人意识到，如果我另有建议，我深表歉意！ 是的，“海顿”很容易拼错。

真正。
我倾向于忽略所有 犹太伟人和天才 声称是因为犹太媒体和媒体从不让公众看到非犹太的伟人和天才。

对于作家来说也是如此……例如菲利普·罗斯？……完全扭曲的肚脐，不可赎回的垃圾。

来自 SolontoCroesus #158：

在我看来，基督教的灵魂在于审美。 也许这就是为什么伦纳德·伯恩斯坦 (Leonard Bernstein) 是天主教/基督教世界观中一股破坏性力量的象征。

从 leonardbernstein.com:

伯恩斯坦和施瓦茨设想的 MASS 不是一场音乐会，而是一场完全上演的戏剧盛会。 他们混合了神圣和世俗的文本，使用传统的拉丁礼仪序列作为基本结构，并在当代英语中插入了质疑和挑战规定服务的比喻，以及需要时间反思的冥想。 他们采取了三叉戟弥撒，这是一种高度仪式化的天主教仪式，旨在逐字背诵，并将其应用到一种非常犹太的与上帝辩论和争论的做法上。 结果是一件有力地传达了 1970 年代初期的混乱和文化萎靡不振、质疑权威和倡导和平的作品。

对这项工作的成功有什么想法，无论是论战还是艺术？

和雅克·席尔：

激进的别致和毛茂捕手
由汤姆·沃尔夫（Tom Wolfe）
出版商 Farrar, Straus & Giroux
出版日期 1970
介质类型 打印（精装和平装）
第 153 页
书号0-553-14444-8

附注。 我认为，自称为“粗鲁的土块”意味着您“有很多事情要做”并且无法自己查找资料。

来自 SolontoCroesus #158：

在我看来，基督教的灵魂在于审美。 也许这就是为什么伦纳德·伯恩斯坦 (Leonard Bernstein) 是天主教/基督教世界观中一股破坏性力量的象征。

从 leonardbernstein.com:

伯恩斯坦和施瓦茨设想的 MASS 不是一场音乐会，而是一场完全上演的戏剧盛会。 他们混合了神圣和世俗的文本，使用传统的拉丁礼仪序列作为基本结构，并在当代英语中插入了质疑和挑战规定服务的比喻，以及需要时间反思的冥想。 他们采取了三叉戟弥撒，这是一种高度仪式化的天主教仪式，旨在逐字背诵，并将其应用到一种非常犹太的与上帝辩论和争论的做法上。 结果是一件有力地传达了 1970 年代初期的混乱和文化萎靡不振、质疑权威和倡导和平的作品。

对伯恩斯坦的弥撒有什么想法，无论是论战还是美学上的成功？

关于MM的其他观点：

http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2012/10/the-final-nail-in-malachi-martins-coffin.html
和评论

http://ourladysresistance.org/malachi-martin.html

5ds

What is this recurrent abomination of acting as proof reader? I see it constantly in 乌兹网 comments, and as off topic and smug as it sounds, I ask whether it’s anything more than attention seeking behavior.

显然你和英语有严重的分歧。 现在我会在这里等你打字——因为你似乎不喜欢写作——“你是个精英主义者！ 呸呸呸！”

“在我看来，这种不断强调犹太人、偏爱他和对他特别感兴趣的倾向，这种倾向于承认他的才能甚至天才的倾向，源于这样一个事实，即犹太人对犹太人的品质特别敏感”

这不是他们对自己的关注的来源。
阅读赫茨尔在宣传犹太复国主义时所写的日记，你就会明白。
犹太人想要并希望赫茨尔所描述的处于……“以贵族般的仁慈接待我们的访客”的位置上……并且受到钦佩。
犹太人想成为“某个人”……让外邦人和世界将他们视为贵族和人类中的某种贵族。
正如我们现在看到的，相反的情况发生了……他们没有成为“仁慈的”或贵族，他们的犹太复国主义反而使他们被视为侏儒纳粹和寄生虫。

https://archive.org/stream/TheCompleteDiariesOfTheodorHerzl_201606/TheCompleteDiariesOfTheodorHerzlEngVolume1_OCR_djvu.txt

在这里 JS ……你可以在纽约杂志上阅读 Radical Chic 的全文

http://nymag.com/news/features/46170/

所以，和他们交朋友吧。 爱他们。

（叹气。）........不要让蝎子搭在你的背上......记住青蛙发生了什么。

你的批评很有价值，吉尔斯。

在我过长的评论中，您发现了什么“部分真实，部分谎言，部分省略”？

我不知道工作。
我会做一些研究，然后给你回复。

其他犹太艺术家和文化评论家对基于天主教文化偶像的艺术进行了评论和创作，并且普遍不尊重、蔑视或以某种方式误解了目标，以增强犹太人对犹太人优越感的看法——犹太人对威尔第作品的挪用/误解，尤其是纳布科，浮现在脑海中。 我已经观察过太多次了，所以我倾向于对伯恩斯坦的工作持怀疑态度。

IIRC（我确实记得它，帖子的历史会证实），我是第一个发帖否定伯恩斯坦的“激进时尚”，其他几个主题，同样的事情倒在其他人身上。

我不在乎其他人是否声称是第一个（除了我）注意到这些现象的人，但许多海报都很便宜。

我不期望得到特别的尊重，但我很生气，主要是这里的“匿名”评论者，大约三分之二的 Zio-trolls，其余的大部分，Mud-slime trolls。

都是拼图。 除非有人找出巴比伦国王为何认为有必要引进犹太人，否则无法解决。

伯恩斯坦，西区故事，里面充满了罗密欧与朱丽叶（早期电影）的陈词滥调和副本（在电影中）。

我猜想那头驴脸的科普兰在部分内容中加入了一点他的“纽约作为现代城市的声音”。 那是非常无聊的，混乱的和弦，每一行末尾的渐强。

否则，那里有什么？ 不多。

有趣的是，他们都是软糖堆积者。 以前不知道。

有趣的是，科普兰、伯恩斯坦以及那些在好莱坞电影配乐传统中追随他们的人，他们都使用了 19 世纪和 20 世纪初欧洲歌剧的主题。 瓦格纳！ 当然，他们在抨击瓦格纳，因为如果他们的观众熟悉瓦格纳，他们就会发现他们的英雄实际上是小偷。

说真的，这些“美国”作曲家对一个男人来说是模仿古老的歌剧主题。 大家 使用威尔第（尤其是好莱坞作曲家，直到今天）进行喧闹的集结和哭泣的戏剧。 受瓦格纳影响的爱情主题几乎出现在每部经典电影中。 科普兰自己也用瓦格纳式来描绘他的场景。 暴乱！ 直到日出和鸟鸣等。科普兰一定是一个非常扭曲的人物，私下知道。 我在他更亲密/小场景中看到了一些晚期的普契尼。 就像，几乎被吓坏了。 还有什么 CHUTZPAH，因为 Puccini 还活着直到 C​​opland 成年——Copland 想，嘿，我们运行这个场景。 我们会做到这一点，所以没有人知道谁先做了什么，只知道我们正在做 *现在*.

至于爵士乐对他们来说很重要，那只是营销——他们的声音中没有任何东西像爵士乐，更像是欧洲的oompa民谣/吉普赛，可以说是爵士乐的一种，但是当伯恩斯坦等人声称对他们的“美国”作品有直接影响。 他们正在寻找来自旧爵士乐标准的可识别片段，用于……页面浏览。 这些家伙是最初的点击诱饵贩子。 这是秃头。 它要么是爵士乐，要么是早餐麦片的广告。 没有爵士乐。

无论如何，真正的爵士音乐家/作曲家，比如 Jelly Roll Morton，会说他们从古典音乐/歌剧中获得了很多音乐灵感，来自现场表演——Jelly Roll 说他曾经经常听多尼采蒂，威尔第歌剧他可以——一个多世纪以来，新奥尔良一直是美国欧洲音乐文化的据点，纽约甚至还没有能力维持一个场景。 由于纽约只是美国音乐史上的一个新参与者，因此人们可以看到新奥尔良将如何成为真正继承内在音乐文化传统的地方。 在早期爵士乐中，绝对可以听到欧洲音乐传统的片段。 对不起莱尼！ 没有“纯粹”的音乐流派，无论这些秃鹫多么想宣传隶属关系。 “我们认同由黑人制作的爵士乐” 抱歉，即使爵士乐也有瓦格纳式的影响，boychik！

作为一个音乐知识很少但接触广泛的年轻人，我总是发自内心地避免像亚伦科普兰、伯恩斯坦这样的人的音乐——所有的百老汇音乐剧及其相应的“电影”。 我花了几年时间才意识到马勒并不是全部。 我以为我错过了什么。 我一直在努力。 那里仍然什么都没有。

Henry Parsch 怎么样（我不确定拼写）？ 他的工作非常有趣。

德索萨？ 当然，他只是在创作国歌，但做得非常好。

至于后来，在犹太人接管之后，没什么兴趣，我同意，没什么

获得莫扎特歌剧和任何巴赫。 一般的巴洛克音乐，例如 Monteverdi、John Blow。 拧这个typa 胡言乱语。

“我在这里没有社交生活，这对我来说是一件幸运的事情。 一世
我本来可以在晚宴上闪闪发光的。”

– 谦卑的 T 赫兹尔

在家试试这个：

词搜索，

西奥多·赫茨尔的完整日记:
https://archive.org/stream/TheCompleteDiariesOfTheodorHerzl_201606/TheCompleteDiariesOfTheodorHerzlEngVolume1_OCR_djvu.txt

“蓝眼睛” 2 匹配
“大师赛” 0 场比赛
“anti-Semiti_ 82 匹配
“讨厌_” 4 匹配

我的奋斗:
http://childrenofyhwh.com/multimedia/library/Hitler/mein-kampf.pdf

“蓝眼睛” 0 匹配
“大师赛” 0 场比赛
“antiSemiti_ 2 匹配
“仇恨_ 71 匹配

对于古典音乐，我会让其他人评判伯恩斯坦，但关于菲利普·罗斯，我同意你的看法。 粪便、手淫的赘生物是他的交易品。 他们甚至不愉快。 地狱，如果诺贝尔委员会要搞这样的事情，他们可能会有一个更有价值的竞争者托马斯品钦，除了他的性幻想之外，他实际上是一位伟大的作家。

奇怪的流动诶

这些年来，从 18 岁起，我就一直喜欢赫伯特·冯·卡拉扬 (Herbert Von Karajan) 指挥的柏林爱乐乐团和贝多芬的作品。 没有别的比较。

我想我喜欢由亨利·刘易斯 (Henry Lewis) 指挥的一个版本或第六个版本。 这对我很有吸引力，但我没有钱，只能买得起冯·卡拉扬。 我有一个带有小型内置扬声器的小型便携式电动播放器

现在我看到伯恩斯坦完全是同性恋，这是我几乎没有同情的人类性和弦，突然间我知道冯卡拉扬的性取向变得至关重要。 我喜欢男人的工作，但就这样离开了。 我知道他是纳粹分子，但我从未反对他。 我继续前进。 否则我对他的生活一无所知......认为没有必要。

但即使我在遥远的殖民区，我们也无法逃脱伯恩斯坦……卡利普索和雷鬼音乐在那里占据主导地位。 伯恩斯坦 (Bernstein) 的华丽消息传开了，以及我听过的他的音乐告密，但从未引起我的注意

但我并不是在寻找古典音乐。 我在周日晚上的节目中在广播中听到了它，贝多芬被困住了。 但不是在亨德尔之前！ 我得到了一份弥赛亚的副本……我不记得是谁的了。 然后我幸运地进入了第六个并永远被迷住了。 我把它穿在我的小播放器上。 甚至那些听到我不断演奏第六声的朋友，所有比我更尼安德特人的人，也看到了这一点。 在我的灵魂中，第六个比弥赛亚更长寿

但这次我想。 今天，看看冯·卡拉扬是不是同性恋……感谢基督教上帝他不是……他是一个狂热的异性恋。 我喜欢！

冯·卡拉扬 (Von Karajan) 在我的万神殿中仍然没有受到玷污……我持有白人的部分，他们曾经是人类，过着/过着人类的生活，并在他们的生活中做过/做过为普遍利益和人类进步做出贡献的工作。 它不是一个空的存档。

菲德尔卡斯特罗在那里，尽管他认为自己是黑人的一部分。 我不介意将卡斯特罗视为白人......并注意他在我的白色万神殿中最突出的位置

但在搜索冯·卡拉扬时，我还想查一下亨利·刘易斯……你知道什么……亨利·刘易斯是一个黑人，一个非裔美国人。

这些年来，我不知道这个事实。 知道后我非常高兴。 难怪我被他的第六感所吸引。 它的精神相连。 我现在就去找他的歌。 我在我的生活中赚了一些普通的钱，即我现在可以买得起唱片了。

没有人可以在我的灵魂中驱逐冯卡拉扬，但我可以添加一些同样好的，精神上的东西。

他们说冯卡拉扬是冷酷的完美，精确而无情。 我读了一些评论，比如伯恩斯坦和冯卡拉扬之间的一些评论，比如伯恩斯坦和冯卡拉扬之间的博客比较，9 对 XNUMX 赞成伯恩斯坦。 所以我得出结论，大多数评论者都是犹太人，在令人印象深刻的冯卡拉扬面前支持他们的孩子。

我和冯·卡拉扬之间从来没有感情上的困难。 我找到了他……在他身上找到精神、情感

请注意……你们必须知道我不是欧洲古典音乐的专家……只是在这里记录我从 18 岁起就知道并喜爱的部分的有限经验……事实上，从我很小的时候开始男孩，如果我们在教堂里考虑弥赛亚，当我不得不去教堂时……我真正享受的那段经历之一

我喜欢这个线程。 我不关心伯恩斯坦的任何形状或形式。 但这里有一些有意义的谈话，可以扩展我的知识。 我很高兴我来了

事实上，我在这里开始狂欢。 我将进入贝多芬，尤其是不同指挥家的第六部，看看他们都提供了什么。

我将再次从冯·卡拉扬开始，但亨利·刘易斯和塞尔吉乌·切利比达什也是如此

如果这是我在这个线程上发表的最后一篇文章……或者任何其他线程一段时间……你们都可以放心，音乐占据了我接下来在这里度过的时间

“我对迷恋音乐的人没有很高的评价。”

——你认为这与你自认对音乐的无知有关吗？ 也许你需要思考一下，为什么你与“孔子、柏拉图和波普尔重新音乐美学以及黑格尔和海德格尔”不同。 将尼采、兰格和斯克鲁顿的名字添加到列表中。

玛丽莲霍恩今天去世了……今天早上。 极好的！

我不是欧洲古典音乐的专家。

没有人会猜到。

我将于 13 月 16 日至 XNUMX 日在布达佩斯参加 Adam Fischer 的 Ring Cycle。

感兴趣吗？

我认为他只是一个非常有才华的指挥家。

找到最好的（或首选的）表演是一件有趣的事情，我同意 von Krajahan 为贝多芬演奏，可能更多。

如果在韩国首尔，就去国立民族音乐厅，一场学生表演。 部分将是宫廷音乐（仍然存在争议，因为我们的政府正在尽可能多地偷窃，但韩语版是真实的，比日语版更真实）。

部分将是融合的，韩国乐器与西方乐器混合，我去过两次
在演出中，他们（以及非常年轻的作曲家）做得非常好。

部分是 samul nori，打击乐，非常令人兴奋的模式。

有趣的是，这里和韩国的美国占领军现在基本上（但从未完全）隐形。 当然，在大多数情况下，Px 和所有无用的女制服让他们在基地里保持快乐。

他们应该走开！

......您列出的名字都与音乐没有任何直接联系，甚至没有有趣的文字。

奇怪。

你是韩国人？

我不知道。

卡拉扬？ 绝症？

在贝多芬中，他们都同样糟糕。

攻击软，发音不准。

Celibidache 将卡拉扬的贝多芬污名化为“巧克力贝多芬”——但他也同样糟糕。

Celi 确实指挥了 Kindertotenlieder。

这里有很多对马勒的不明智的滥用。 可能只是困扰这些页面的典型反犹太主义者，而不是对古典音乐有任何真正了解的人。

贝多芬的早期批评家认为他的 3rr 交响曲——《英雄》——是脱节的、嘈杂的、臃肿的、过长的。 早期的评论家往往不是最好的，即使是最伟大的作品也需要时间才能在曲目中找到自己的位置并被公众和评论家接受。

好的！ 那么你如何看待亨利刘易斯的第六个？

“你列出的名字中没有一个与音乐有任何直接联系，甚至没有有趣的文字。”

——《Che Guava》，你最喜欢的音乐作家是谁？

如果您从未听说过这些好书：

弗雷德雷西尼采， 音乐精神悲剧的诞生

苏珊·兰格 新钥匙中的哲学 ——一部伟大的音乐哲学著作

罗杰·斯克鲁顿 穆西美学c — 由哲学家和作曲家撰写的关于音乐美学的最佳作品

好的回复，女士。

谢谢，我不熟悉那个，但会研究一下。
我记得在收音机里听过几首我喜欢的马勒的歌曲。 正如我所说，我喜欢他的第一部交响曲，而他的第四部有一些优美的乐章。 但是他的大型交响曲对我不起作用，也许只是我的空白。

没错，但是。 . . .

在这条线上，可能很少有人听过马勒的第九交响曲，第一乐章，而不是我自己。 我从来没能在上面画一个珠子，这不是因为缺乏尝试。 此外，我能够在之前从未听过的情况下识别出他的《千人交响曲》，这表明我对他的音乐有很好的（业余聆听）知识。

请注意，这是我大学里的朋友（亚洲人，对于那些保持种族分数的人）告诉我马勒有多棒的时候，所以我试图融入其中。

我听说马勒和布鲁克纳很相似，但前者更有诗意，而后者则乏味。 好吧，我听了一次布鲁克纳的第三交响曲 [是的，第三交响曲] 就被迷住了（不是因为我可以让我的任何朋友同意）。

我也不确定您对贝多芬的《英雄》是否准确。 我记得读过的当代批评是关于它的“无调性”，对我们的耳朵（或任何人——比如贝多芬本人——知道巴赫所做的事情）来说非常有趣。 贝多芬在他自己的有生之年就成为了超级巨星，因此就其价值而言，大部分意见，一般性和批评性的，几乎肯定是支持的。 坦率地说，很容易找到对伟大音乐的糟糕评论。 歌剧壁橱里热闹的骷髅有一整章专门介绍它们。

我会听他的 Kindertotenlieder，我想我会喜欢的。 刚才在网上浏览，我想我在某个地方存放了这张 CD 并且我很喜欢它：

我会看看会发生什么。

正如我之前所说，这只是音乐。

卡拉扬是奥地利人。 他不是纳西人。 他的航母在二战之后很久

正如下一位评论者所说的那样（220 条），这是一个很好的回复，但我在这一点上并不傻。

我会假设柏拉图、亚里士多德、瓦格纳，以及我读过的其他人，包括一小部分值得一读的摇滚记者。

就个人而言，我更喜欢听音乐，下定决心，阅读有关声音以及声音和音乐的结构的书籍。 因此，Helmholtz，意大利未来主义者，在噪音艺术中的写作，还有 Russolo 对他更多的西方音乐背景作品的写作，以及马里内蒂关于他开始超前的无线电音乐作品的写作等等。 当然，也由后来的作家对毕达哥拉斯的声音和音乐的想法。

关于韩国​​宫廷音乐的结构，关于它起源于那里还是这里的争论（肯定来自朝鲜半岛，而不是日本）。

如果有机会，我想阅读您的第一条和第三条建议，但已经阅读了第一条的许多引文。

沙特阿拉伯对马来文化的影响想淘汰加麦兰玩家，但如果有耳闻，多参加几次，很容易发挥出它的天才，不需要论文就可以看到它。

等等

好点。 我倾向于同意“非音乐”的思维方式（康德、黑格尔、海德格尔）； 另外，我对其他思想场所持开放态度： http://gen.lib.rus.ec/book/index.php?md5=94381B24EA4A2CEC253E060AB538FD25

赫伯特·冯·卡拉扬 (Herbert Von Karajan) 出生于 1908 年……很多时候都是纳粹分子

是的，他是奥地利人，而且离纳粹很近

现在我自己不在那里看看发生了什么，所以我不直接知道。 但有报道似乎证实他实际上是一名纳粹分子

我根本不在乎他是不是纳粹伊利亚娜……至少不在乎。 这是 2018 年。我喜欢他是异性恋的事实，他创作了很棒的音乐......定义为我喜欢的音乐

有时我喜欢说话..所以谢谢你给我机会向你咆哮。

hahahahaha

这些天我旅行不多，但我一定会牢记这一点，同时，探索这位指挥家的作品。

谢谢！

哦，你真是个了不起的笨蛋。 如果你有两半的智慧来摩擦，你可能会很有趣，但如果缺乏这一点，那就很无聊了。

说真的——考虑一下。

希特勒也是奥地利人。 卡拉扬是 NSDAP 的成员，这就是为什么戈培尔提拔他而不是富特旺格勒，后者拒绝加入该党。 戈培尔为卡拉扬的职业生涯开了一个好头。

阅读罗杰·沃恩 (Roger Vaughan) 对卡拉扬的可读性很强的传记，我的印象是，卡拉扬除了自己的自我推销外，并没有政治上的意义。 他不会是第一个也不会是最后一个拥有超大自我的指挥家。

你大错特错。 阅读理查德·奥斯本 (Richard Osborne) 对卡拉扬 (Karajan) 进行彻底研究的传记——罗杰·沃恩 (Roger Vaughan) 是一位卡拉扬 (Roger Vaughan) 无法容忍的人，因为他对航海知识很了解，而这位大师很热衷于此。

事实上，卡拉扬确实加入了该党。 这是真的。 如果他想从事指挥事业，他别无选择，他从小就具有非凡的天赋。 没有证据表明卡拉扬有任何倾向纳粹意识形态。 他关心音乐，首先，最后，永远。

卡拉扬在战争的大部分时间里都默默无闻地生活在贫困中。 希特勒不喜欢他，也许是因为卡拉扬的第一任妻子是犹太人。 严格的去纳粹化委员会给了卡拉扬一份清白的健康证明，然后在欧洲古典音乐界，主要是在奥地利和英国，他一路走来。 说“戈培尔比富特旺格勒提拔他”是荒谬的。 在战争年代指挥柏林爱乐乐团的是富特旺格勒，而不是卡拉扬，只有在富特旺格勒于 1950 年代去世后，卡拉扬才接替了他的职位。

卡拉扬有野心吗？ 野心应该由更严厉的东西构成； 在他的黄金岁月里，他因为不是纳粹的宠儿而被推到场边。 你很容易在远离卡拉扬生存环境的空间和时间上扮演道德裸露者。尽管像罗杰沃恩这样的批评家严厉，卡拉扬确实在他那个时代的艺术万神殿中占据了他应有的位置，我，一方面，我很高兴。

我不明白你的谩骂和人身攻击。 虽然我的言论可能有误，但我认为我很文明。 我希望你也一样。 是我期待太多了吗？

大量的糖不足以制作出美味的蛋糕。 在一顿饭中混合所有四种基本口味并不能使它成为法国菜。 我们对感官刺激做出反应。 某些和声和某些乐句对我们的情绪有一定的影响。 将它们中的很多放在一个作品中并不能创作出出色的音乐作品。
虽然我受过一些音乐教育，但我绝对不会假装是专家。 我偏爱巴赫、贝多芬、勃拉姆斯和拉赫玛尼诺夫，但我喜欢许多其他古典作曲家的作品。 马勒不是其中之一，我从未感觉到与他的音乐的联系。 我拥有 Cluytens、Karajan、Mravinsky、Szell、Kondrashin 和许多其他人导演的音乐唱片。 有些作品我有多个录音。 有些表演我比其他人更喜欢。 有些表演者我比其他人更喜欢，小提琴的大卫奥伊斯特拉赫，钢琴的斯维亚托斯拉夫里希特，里希特的 Rach nr2 是我最喜欢的。 我也喜欢 Zimerman，但我更喜欢 Bösendorfer 的声音而不是 Steinway 的声音，这是一个品味问题。
虽然我可能在某处有伯恩斯坦的一些录音，比如马勒，但我从未真正感觉到与他的音乐或导演有任何联系。 在我看来，他具有三个基本才能，他是犹太人、同性恋者和自由主义者。 这绝对超过了任何音乐才能，无论他的职位多么强大，任何潜在的挑战者都可以拥有。

我受过割礼，生来就是天主教徒。 我从来没有想太多，但我的假设是所有天主教徒，至少是美国天主教徒，都接受过割礼。 有谁知道为什么？
我同意，这是野蛮的。 不过，我想知道这如何“使”成为犹太人（而不是天主教徒？），以及它对一个人的生活可能会或可能不会产生什么样的创伤影响。 它会让一个人成为精神病患者吗？

“我不禁相信，参与残害他们儿子的行为并不能培养出非凡的否认能力，因为他们看不到明显的真相，没有注意到思想中的明显矛盾。”

我只是读了这个，所以还没有真正考虑它，但这似乎很荒谬。

现在这对我非常有帮助。 我知道这个 CBTerry，但还不够深入，无法像你那样表达。 谢谢老兄..你让我对一个我认识并尊重了很长时间的人感觉更好

我第一次听到柏林爱乐乐团和卡拉扬演奏贝多芬的第六曲时，我被迷住了……线条和坠子。 直到今天仍然如此，我说的是 45 年前

我很享受卡拉扬指挥的一切。 我读到的关于他的所有文章都描述了一个非常普通的人。 我总是认为他是正常的、正常的等等。这就是为什么我在这里仔细检查以确保..他肯定不是同性恋

如果他，卡拉扬同性恋......确实会令人失望，事实上我将不得不花一些时间来适应

你喜欢卡拉扬的柴可夫斯基吗？

我一生中大部分时间都是演奏巴松管和管风琴的专业音乐家，我曾经对伯恩斯坦的录音有很多想法。 回想起来，我认为它们大多是对伟大作品的糟糕解释。 这些是伯恩斯坦的解释。 就好像 Lennie 要向你展示这一切应该是怎样的。

他的录音只是一个人的解释。 我认为他的想法是他的解释将是确定的，并且会以正确的方式点燃世界。

没有东西会离事实很远。

我很高兴阅读了这篇关于虚假人才和事业背叛者的文章。 他似乎伤害了那些爱他的人，只关心他的野心和欲望。 无论他的成就如何，充其量也只是平庸，他作为一个人似乎是个失败者。 就连他对黑豹的调情，似乎也是为了自己的夸大。 糟糕！

我可不可以这样说——这么多小傻瓜发这个贴，撒谎的人，还有心怀仇恨的人！

人性 …。

如果您是在此线程上说了邪恶和不真实事情的人之一，请尽您所能，并反思：向宽恕的上帝祈祷。 问自己为什么你不诚实和邪恶的原因可能太过分了：所以简单地请求原谅你的谎言，或者你所说的真实的话，不知道它们是否真实......在你有罪的傲慢中。

善的在美中显露出来，至于恶的……。
向深渊看不要太久，我可怜的朋友们，怕深渊回头看！
你有我的祈祷，我的守护天使的祈祷，还有许多其他人的祈祷，支持你从无知中走出来！

伯恩斯坦和马勒的所作所为都很糟糕。

https://www.londonmet.ac.uk/news/spotlight/the-mozart-effect-on-short-term-memory/

“对音乐对语言记忆影响的研究表明，听莫扎特可以提高回忆单词的能力，而听马勒则有相反的效果。”

其中一位研究作者说：“相比之下，马勒的音乐以一种非常类似于我们听到外语或婴儿听到他们尚不理解的语言的方式流动。 莫扎特作品中清晰描绘的乐句结构可能支持单词记忆痕迹，而马勒音乐的流动会模糊它。”

实际上，我今天在 The Daily Stormer 上看到了那篇文章，这篇文章说，由于犹太人的推广，“马勒的交响乐现在是西方世界继贝多芬的交响曲之后演奏最广泛的作品。”

有谁知道这是真的吗？ 我很难相信马勒的交响曲会比柴可夫斯基的交响曲得到更广泛的演奏。 我尝试查看一些主要交响乐团的音乐会时间表，但 COVID 几乎摧毁了它们。 Concertgebouw 的日程表仍然取消了列出的表演，我没有看到马勒，但后来注意到他们安排了整个马勒音乐节。

当人们被告知马勒的交响乐是有教养的听众喜欢的伟大音乐时，这或许可以解释为什么现在很少有人听古典音乐了。

......例如菲利普罗斯？......完全扭曲的肚脐，不可赎回的垃圾。

并且疯狂地、精神上地、强烈地反白人。

现代赞美马勒的人一定看过肯·罗素 (Ken Russell) 对他一生同样疯狂的电影（以及其他作曲家的电影，从 七面纱之舞 )，太多次，并把它当作福音，或者受到它的启发来发动他们的反白人宣传。